I have read the book The Al Qaeda Connection.  How much of the book is actually proven?
548008
al qaeda are all wankers and id love to tell them to their fuckin faces
517394
The second edition is very good.  So, I read all of the above and I have way too much in my head to try and type it all here.  All I will say is I have no "conspiracy theory."  I have questions...many, many questions.  "Loose Change" does just the same thing, asks questions.  I'm going to a conference put on by Alex Jones next month in Los Angeles and the young guys that made "Loose Change" will be there, as well.  It should be interesting.\nThe Popular Mechanics article is bunk.  http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?qid=1006051612475&pa=FZB6NXXtFWMW0cLWwu4T8Vz6aiAvUt4M43cHcOeaifCbrDhBhhA- (My rebuttle.)
497365
The book 'L'Effroyable Imposture' by Thierry Meyssan (French language)\n\nDeals with many topics including:\n\nThe crash into the Pentagon and why the undercarriage had not come down first if the airplane had struck that low.  It also asks why the carcass of the airplane and fuselage was not recovered.  It mentions refusal to show immediate replay of film footage that had captured the event.\n\nIt deal with issues of rivalry between and among intelligence groups such as the CIA, the FBI and Mossad (Israeli Intelligence).  Israel allegedly had warned American Intelligence a few days in advance of September 11, 2001 of an impending attack.  It seems they do not always like to share information and work together because they want to solve cases by themselves and take the credit.\n\nIt deals with the collapse of the New York Trade Centre and mentions how many insiders felt it was crumbling from the bottom rather than from the top down and seemed to be falling apart contrary to the laws of physics.  The event was, however, unprecedented. \n\nSome of the theories put forth in the book allegedly have been challenged and/or discredited.  It has, however, some good ideas.
714979
Untrue theory.\n-Why would the government attack it's biggest military installation? Americans supported War on Terror right after Twin Towers were hit. The Pentagon being hit would not have influenced anyone's anger even more.\n-Why can't theorists put together how everything connects in those theories?\n-Why would the Israelis have to do with it? Their only big support is from us, and if Americans turned on them, they would be in trouble.\n-Why were surveilance videos relaesed, showing the hi-jackers at the airports on 9/11?\n-Why were ticket desk attendents be able to go on TV and describe what happened that day, without falting and trying to think of descriptions?\n-If Bin Laden was working for the government, why would we almost kill him twice in raids?\n-Why would the government want to start wars? It just costs them money.\n-Why would childhood friends of bin Laden be able to aduquately describe how he got influenced to become the violent person he is today if he does not actually exist?\n-If bin Laden is fake, why does he have a ton of family members with the same last name living today?\n-The websites of these theories flip flop. Some say there were people on the plane, and others say there was no one on the plane that day. If there was no one, why are there people who can prove they lost a family member that day, and why do these sites glip flop?\n-We hated terrorists before, as they blew up part of the USS Cole  years back, and that angered many people as it was.\n-We have hated radical Islam actually since 1979, when American hostages were hed in Iran, and many Americans would have supported a war then on terror.\n-Why would we need an excuse to invade Iraq, when we helped Iraq in their campaign against Iran in the 80's? Many people say that Bush Sr. Started the Gulf War over oil, but if he wanted oil, Saddam would have happily given it to him, because of our previous dealings with him, and our support of him.\n\n\nSee whatI'm saying? I once believed those theories, but they always flipped flopped, and none of them explained how every terrrorist event in part of this so called "conspiracy" connected. You are not a fool for believing these theories. You are just suspicious of the government, as many of us are.
355827
Is there really an Osama bin Laden ?\n\nIs there really a fool out there who believes that a bearded man, spending time in the caves of Afghanistan by doing Namaz five times a day with comrades who don't speak a word of any language other than Arabic or Poshtu, sitting in a country which in 2002 didn't have ISD or internet could realy coordinate a suicide attack from three places of USA to two different targets, all synchronized to split-second accuracy, evading the FBI and so many other intelligences, and nobody found a trace of this all-time-great military management network which surpassed even the Japanese during the world war II ?\n\nSure it was not the work of some US-inhouse fanatics, whom the Government can not catch and so should have a myth to cover up the failure ?\n\nAnd now this man is giving a monthly update of his tirade using the federal spokesperson as his own ?
1054946
There is an entire book talking about the stories and in the end it came to the conclusions that there isn't  a direct link to any.  For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge was debunked and so many others.  It is work picking up.  It is called The F Word.
1177382
Actually, the "terrorist Oliver North feared most" was a complete lie.  He never said that nor ever mentioned Osama bin Laden in anything he talked about.  Urban legend, check out facts before you report it.\n\nhttp://www.snopes.com/rumors/north.asp\n\nIn fact, you will find no references to Al Qaeda before 1993 in any government document, book, or press release.  Reason, Al Qaeda is NOT the proper name of any terrorist group.  It means "the database" originally, and was the name of the Israeli Sin Bet database used to track mujahadeen fighters and the CIA trainers in Afghanistan by the Israelis (they liked to keep track of when and how we trained Islamic radicals for some odd reason).\n\nIn joint operations with the Israelis between our FBI, CIA, and NSA with Mossad and Sin Bet, somehow it was understood by someone at the top as "Osama and his crew were part of Al Qaeda", this misnomer stuck, and the over-simplified propoganda campaign after 9/11 saw Bush using this projected name all the time.  In intelligence circles Al Qaeda is now used as a blanket term for any kind of organized terror.  Individual groups are properly identified, such as the PLO, PKK, mujahadeen,  etc.  These groups often recieve funding from the same sources (CIA, Saudi royalty, sympathetic Arab businessmen), but in reality are no more related than say if an American businessman would make a campaign donation to both our main political parties.\n\n"Al Qaeda in Iraq" is probably the biggest psy-op going on right now, and with the parading out of photos of the dead Zarqawi our own military intell machine declared it a success.  Small minded Iraqis and Americans alike bought the story hook, line, and sinker.  I even heard on CNN this morning that Zarqawi was meeting with other terror leaders in 2002, when in reality he was locked up for petty theft in a Jordanian prison cell from 2000 to 2003.  His role in beheadings is also suspect, as the victim most seen in videos was still in the orange jumpsuit from his American captivity (his father was told he would be sent directly back to the US when released) for 2 weeks before the beheading, and analysis of the video showed that when they actually cut off his head he had been dead for at least 2 to 4 hours.\n\nhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/09/AR2006040900890_pf.html\n\nhttp://www.craigslist.org/sfc/pol/170657656.html\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Qaeda#Is_al-Qaeda_a_global_network_or_a_small_organization.3F\nThe wiki entry keeps getting re-written...
97730
Seems to be a very interesting site - never heard of it before. Would take a long time to read the whole contents. Some of the things I read are certainly true... however, who is the author of this site? What is their message? Seems to me that it is rather a matter of believe than thinking whether it is true or not...\n\nHow would Mulder say: The truth is out there ;-)
1119151
Your question is very astute!\n\nIn Bill Sammon's book "Strategery", Al-Zarkawi is quoted from an intercepted letter.  It states that Al-Qaeda's only chance to win is to dupe the stupid and gullible American public into thinking the war is not winnable.\n\nWhat shocks me is that you could read the quote to certain far left Liberals, and they just don't seem to understand that we cannot lose militarily.  We can only lose public support for the war.\n\nThat is Al-Qaeda's goal.  They want us to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
679781
I suggest you read the following link. It examines a lot of the conspiracy theory arguments and shows why the arguments doesn't hold water.
1076712
Yes, but what is more important is who turned him in.  Sunni's,  this an extremely big deal.  Sunni support for terrorism within their own country is coming to an end.
1154170
9-11  Are you serious?  I watch it the conspiracy is the oldest wrong info around.  My father work in Homeland Security.  The facts are what we saw the stories people tell are just that.  We were attacked!!!!
1054438
I've searched for al-Qaeda on Google and I didn't find a website that could be theirs, so I don't think they really have a webpage.\nIf you want you can find out more things about al-Qaeda here:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda
962094
The Illuminati and The Protocols.\nhttp://jahtruth.co.uk/illumin.htm#main
506988
Yes, I have read it.  Actually, my mom knew the women in it before the Lafferty brothers killed here.  The deal with this book is that it is definetely written by an individual who is not a fan of Mormonism and his bias is obvious.\nThat being said the actual factual information about the Lafferty's and the FLDS group is really very good and the book does a good job of laying these problems out.  Krakeur is also correct in pointing out that these at least partially results from a larger problem in Mormonism.  Mormonism is like Islam in that can breed extremism if not careful.  Hopefully Mormons will be more successful in dealing with these issues than muslims.\nOverall, I thought the book was an excellent historical work on some touchy issues that are not discusses as much as they should but I wish it would have been a little more objective.
602004
Find out the truth for yourself.  Watch the video in the link below.  It also has stuff about the WTC and about the Pentagon.  Its really interesting and gives us all insight on what could be a possible truth to 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden.  Tell me what you think about it after you watch it!
368670
Of course it is real OVER 6 million people were killed by the Nazi's.  \n\nThere is tOo much evidence to proof otherwise. Did you see the TV film of the bodies, and the gas chambers.\nAnd is there no more Jews in Europe...\n\nI hope Ahmedjinhad does have that conference, and invite REAL scholars. Then he will learn the truth.\n\nIgnorance means history will be repeated. Holocust should never happen again