Do everyone thinks that afghanistan is country of terrorists.?
548497
No.the taliban were told, give up bin laden or else.they chose or else The united nations sangtioned the invasion.Nothing has changed and the women still wear the burka
1187331
No they aren't. Actually most of them think we are terrorist!
1020959
I am convinced that it would make everyone's life easier. The only terrorist I know of, judging by history and fact is the US, influenced by Israel. Notice the bogus "war on terror"... What a joke!  The US and Israel orchestrated 9/11... So who are the terrorist?  The Arabs are not the ones bombing us!  And what about Harper, Canadian PM who made me ashamed for first time in my life to be Canadian!  8 billion for 8 war planes and 2 billion for 3 warships...  We went from peacekeepers to warmongers, a faint copy of the US.... I won't wear a Canadian flag on my luggage anymore.  Soon we will be as hated than the US!
418436
Of course it is... where've you been? Greed and personal vendetta. That's all it is.\n\nMeanwhile, the real culprit, Osama Bin-Ladin is out there running around the lovely mountains of Pakistan dragging his dialysis machine and home video set-up around still making pronouncements about how he's going to **** America up.\n\nNice going Bush. Dickweed.
42788
It looks like you have two words going on, terrorist and tourist. But, if you are talking about terrorist, all Iranians are not terrorists, maybe some of them are, but they are all definetly not. That is unfair to say that they are all terrorist, that is like saying that all black people are in gangs, or all white people are dumb. But if you are saying if they are tourist, yes they are if they are just visiting and  sight seeing.
77968
Terrorists are a very hard to define group of people. It depends on the nation or person lobbying the accusation to define who is or is not a terrorists. Take for example, Israelis and the US have often blamed the Hamaz of Palestine as terrorists for targetting civilians but their own country men calls them freedom fighters for their effort in liberating their country. The same can be applied that the rebels in America during the war of independece were terrorists in that they target British loyal subjects. But to answer your questions not all terrorists are Muslims and not all Muslims are terrorists. Terrorists can be applied to any national as the US found out during the Oklahoma bombing or when the IRA in Ireland decided to take arms against the British. We could say that the Germans in WW2 were terrorists for conducting civilian bombing in London and even the US Air force for their bombing and destruction during the Vietnam war not for getting the Mai Lai massacre of unarmed civilians. Generally we label terrorists are those inclined to use violence to solve problems or to make demands for their cause and lead to the use of terror and the threat of violence to further their aims. It is hard to define whether their cause is a just one or another fanatical response to get what the wish for. The label of Muslims as terrorists is an inaccurate picture and generalizes and racial profiling due to fear of the unknown after the Sept 11 bombing as well as escalation of war in the Middle East.
438966
I agree with you - it is two faced! Why is it ok for America to bomb Afghanistan when the legitimate government, the Taliban, who were America's allies against Soviet invaders, were unable to hand over Osama bin Laden? (The new government even with aid from American Navy Seals, Britisn SAS and Ausie SAS troops have not been able to accomplish this task). With that logic Britain should have bombed the USA for not handing over Irish-Americans in NY and Boston - the biggest sponsors of terrorism against the UK, the Irish Republican Army.\n\nIn the same way why did USA not bomb Pakistan for harbouring Osama and Al Queda, running Madrassas where hatred and violence against all other religions is taught. Yet Musharaf was given bribes by Bush and allowed to be a nuclear power. Why is Pk allowed to threaten India with nuclear war and sponsor terrorists to kill MPs in the democratic India Parliament building but Bush told India not to retaliate? Why is Iran not allowed to develop a nuclear deterrent like North Korea's, when US performed blitzkrieg, invasion & occupation on Iran's neighbours who were former US allies: Iraq & Afghanistan!   \n\nWhy is Bush trying Saddam for killing revolutionary seperatist Kurds using the same method Winston Churchill did to the Kurds - poison gas, but sold to him by Donald Rumsfeld (who even embraced Saddam and declared that Saddam was his best friend in the world!!!); but kissing China's communist leader's a.s.s. when China has threatenned Bush with nuclear war over Taiwan & killed their own citizens - students protesting that they want democracy!
1041857
Understand that the American government decides what a terrorist is....the rest of us are no allowed to have such opinions...I am pretty sure under the definitions established by the current administration our forefathers were all terrorist.
203808
I think the government is corrupt and supports terrorist but I don't blame the people in general. The exact same thing can be said of america. I'm no more responsible for nor do I support my countries actions any more than most of the saudi citizens. So in other words come on over brother.
195797
Terrorism is only terrorism, which ever side you remain. Killings  innocents in World Trade Center, At London Railway stations or in Delhi crowded Markets are always terrorism which ever side you are. F-16  are bombing remote villages because terrorist are hiding there.
1104283
Yeah, I also thought that, but it just goes to show that the terrorists are a bunch of thick shits........lol
543724
The answer should be a firm 'No'.\n\nJust because a country doesn't agree with you doesn't make them an enemy let alone responsible for spreading terror.\n\nBesides, if you were to follow that logic, the whole of the European Union (which includes Britain, Germany, Belgium, france, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy) would now be classified as terrorists as the European Court has ruled it is illegal to transfer passenger data to the US.
377073
they arent, havent you hears? they are savages & all they do is ride camels. terrorism is their only export. they all wear towels & robes. their god is our god's bltch. they are hearding our oil. they war all the time because they talk funny. and the old standby,'they are bad people, bad to their people, they wont see things our way, they dont like us & they have illegal weapons'. so ya see, if we take away their humanity they are no longer humans & its ok to kill them at will as long as we get some kind of excuse no matter how lame it is. besides look how much better off they are since weve invaded.
279796
This assumption is not necessarily correct. "all" people dont think Muslims are terrorists. I have many muslim friends who are very good human beings. Innocent, helping and humble
694992
It's more than terrorism. It's genocide, plan and simple and if we weren't tied down in Iraq and Afghanistan, I"d say yes. However, I kinda remember a movie called "Black Hawk Down" and pretty sure we would just get caught in the middle, be somehow blamed for the whole mess and be attacked by both sides before it was all over.  Maybe it's time America looked out for America and get back to taking care of Americans, instead of throwing away money and lives trying to help others that, in return label us as occupiers and turn on us.
716934
I think the last time I heard we have 13,000 troops in Afghanistan... not nearly enough to deal with the actual area that the terroists are located... \n\nmeanwhile we have like 150,000 last time I heard in Iraq... which is not near any terrorist hq... \n\nmaybe we shouldn't have cut and run from Afghanistan... where the majority of the terrorists are... maybe we just created a hot bed for terrorists while we're off trying to solve secrarian violence in Iraq?
56138
You speak in generalities which can never lead to a true answer.\nI don't think Iranians are terrorists. I think that in this world, there are bad people doing bad things and they are of all nationalities, colors, creed, race and religions.\n\nAny one who is an extremist is dangerous to others. This is the only generality I could ever agree with.