Why the police don't have confident, It always need to go with a medical car???
550680
If you are asking, "Why do they always send ambulances on accident calls along with the police?", then the reason is that most police officers are not trained medical professionals. They may have rudimentary first aid, or even possibly first responder knowledge, but they want to have someone who is trained and certified to administer all types of medical assistance. Personally, I'd rather have an EMT or doctor working on me than a police officer with little to no background in medicine.
415078
let the police handle it
388615
Yes. My brother got a ride to work after he wrecked his car on icy pavement. And I got a ride on a holiday when no bus or taxi was passing by. And the person that wrecks your day is usually yourself. The police is just keeping you from doing even greater harm to the general public. In fairness I must say that none of the above facts happened in the USA. One episode was in Germany and the other in Brazil. You have tough laws in the USA for things that are not even noticed in other countries. Like peeing on the street or drinking in public or prostitution
793340
Police are trained very heavy in multi-tasking so yes the can talk on the phone and chase people at high speeds and talk on the radio while running after someone and send a description of the suspect via phone or radio. So give them a bit of a break. Tough job. Before you criticize try it first. Bet you will be all over them thanking them when YOU need them. \nBut yes you Can report them if they are relay doing something wrong. just get the car number. But as far as speeding for them...How do you know they are not on a mission....they do have to obey the laws but if they are on a call that needs a silent alarm..do you know...NO. And buy the way Fire trucks and Ambulances have to adhere to the rules too..even with the lights and sirens on!
286147
Cops don't lie. Don't be rediculous!\n\nRead the article below for more information.
998947
The government seems to think that they have to protect everyone from themselves. Personally, I disagree with that philosophy. But nevertheless it is a fact. There are times when I do not wear my seat belt, especially when I am looking for birds. And if the government does not like it then they can try to catch me. \n\nBut think about this.  If the government were really concerned about people's safety, they would ban semis from the nation's hiways.  They account for a much larger proportion of deaths and injuries than their numbers.  They also account for 90% of the destruction of the hiways but pay for only 10% of the cost of the hiways. \n\nNice to have a powerful lobby.  We have the best government money can buy.
1016333
That is just a motto to get departments more money.  If they really did protect and serve, they wouldn't give so many tickets for very minor offences, making angry drivers a real danger to traffic.
332607
Because if anyone was allowed to drive a car, there would be many injuries. We need a way of regulating who can use a car for the interest of public safety.
803361
I could understand why they would protect the witness, the police do not want the person put into danger. As far as giving out information they don't want to give out information that only the person that committed the crime would know. I think it is normal to with hold information from the press. I am sure they have a reason.
794495
It is important for ANYONE to report someone to the police or to the DMV who is a danger to themselves and/or others when on the road.\n\nMy father's eyesight, as he got older, got to be absolutely awful.  Once, when I was in the car with him, he almost "merged" into a red car.  I asked - no TOLD - him to pull over and hand me the keys.  My kids were in the car with us.  He got pretty mad at me.  I told him when we got home that I would NEVER get into the car with him driving again...and that he should never drive again.  Told my mother that, too.  He drove for a while longer after that until he had an accident in which he was completely at fault...and was pretty badly injured.  His license was taken from him.\n\nHad someone listened to me at the time, this wouldn't have happened.\n\nWhen my mother had a series of small strokes (TIAs), her doctor requested that she not drive for a period of time so that her doctor could evaluate her condition.  She continued to drive.  Her doctor and I talked about it and decided that she was a danger to others.  We decided that the DMV needed to be notified if she continued to drive.  I let her know that this would happen if she continued to do so - hardest thing I've ever done - boy, was she mad at me!  She stopped driving.  Stopped talking to me for a while, too.  In the long run, though, it was a good decision because she kept having the small strokes, which would have meant she would have continued to be a danger to herself and others on the road.\n\nSo, yes, I, personally, think that everyone has that responsibility.
802337
In the states (Nevada), a police vehicle is recognized as an emergency vehicle regardless if the lights & siren are on or not. The reason is that a police vehicle approaching a crime scene may need to approach without broadcasting his presence, yet may still speed. For fire & ambulance, the lights and sirens must be activated for the vehicle to have an emergency status.
837382
Police officers cannot work in a vacuum.  If they don't have the cooperation from citizens who give them information then it is very difficult to stop many criminals.  Why would you worry about getting arrested if you don't do anything against the law?  It is actually extremely easy to follow the law of the land.  I have lost track of the number of times that in my small town there were several people who knew exactly what was going on in the town in regards to who was doing B&Es but no one wants to get involved.  Police need information and there is no magic way of getting this.  \nAlso,  I spend a lot of time going to calls where people are complaining that their 6 year old is getting beat up by the neighbours 6 yr old or complaints that their neighbour is putting snow in their driveway.  Most police services are extremely understaffed, at least in my part of the world, and it takes many officers and lots of man hours to be effective against the crimes you mention.\nDo you know what the number one complaint I get from people when I meet them?  People speeding in their neighbourhoods.\n\nAs for arresting "good" people? I arrest people when I have reasonable and probable grounds to believe they have committed criminal offences.  Are some of them "good"? Yes I suppose some of them are.  But you can be a great citizen and neighbour and still hit your wife.
648321
hello, greeting from Great Britain.\nwell yeah we get something like that in some areas.\nsome sick people still doing this sorts of things and the reasons for this because the polices are not doing their job properly. NOT SO GOOD !!!!!!!!
975843
Well first off, they are going to run a drug dog outside of your car. If the dog alerts on any contraband, then they will search it regardless. HOWEVER: and this is a VERY big one: IF you do not let them search the trunk, they cannot search it UNLESS the dog alerts on that area of your vehicle. ALSO: if your glove box is locked, it is off-limits. They need to acquire a search warrant to search that area ONLY if it is locked. And unless you have a bloody knife dripping out of the cracks, chances are, they wont get one. Other answer: If you have nothing to hide, why not let the morons search? :)
303106
Police anywhere need probable cause to pull you over. But it can be over something simple. You car looks like one that has been stolen, your tail light is out, you're speeding.... MOST cops are actually just doing their jobs and not trying to be jerks about it. But you have a few who take the job to their head. There are also situations where they are looking for someone or something and they can pull cars over at random for searches. But I believe they have to tell you if thats the case.
906728
cause is better to know who is here, than not to know anything about them, if a person crash your car without a valid insurance nobody is going to pay you for your car repairs and injuries, and you would not know who did it, as they don't have driver licenses\njust an example\nthink about it. !!!!!\n\n:> peace\n.
909633
It's against the law to hold anything in your hands while driving - mobile phones, food, drink, etc. \nI think there are about three explainations for why nothing was done with the lady. 1. Police are human too - they made a mistake, didn't notice, didn't care enough, gave her a break. 2. The police were doing a specific job and punishing her for breaking this law would involve taking a large amount of time and paperwork that would take them away from what they were doing originally. 3. They did give her at least a verbal warning which you didn't notice.