When people will protect nature from pollution?
547050
Right after you learn basic grammar.
978057
saving the enviornment.
415534
Cleanliness of the environment.
690177
First concern:  water pollution.  We need water to live.  Our bodies have very limited ability to tolerate unclean water.  It is very hard and costly to clean up water supplies.\nSecond concern:  air pollution.  We need air to live.  Humans can tolerate some pollution, and it is easier to stop pollutants and allow air to clean itself.
1038295
The natural environment is full of wide sparkly rivers and waterfalls and lushes green plants with a plentifly amount of animals.So behind all that there is hurt. Animal populations are low. Plants are be torn down.And the water is getting trashed.
527173
''Conservation of land pollution''?\nYou must mean conservation of land, free of pollution.\nObviously is not as simple as the first answer... avoid fertilizers and you'll avoid food.\nBesides there are lot of organic fertilizers if that's your concern... not cheap or practical though.\nMain thing to do is to use non residual herbicides, or at least the less residual ones.\nSame with insecticides, avoid the ones that contain mainly Cl.\nDo not burn straw, kills all the bacterias and worms.\nPlant forestall curtains, etc
286026
Your question seems to be: "Is the environment in danger because of you?"  Is this what you mean to ask?  (It's not really clear.)\n\nIf this is your meaning, then on a personal level, I don't feel any more responsible than should the collective human race - and I would add that YES, the human race is a detriment to the environment, very obviously.\n\nThe issue is not whether people are threatening the environment - the issue is how much industrial and economic activity is too much for the environment to accomodate?  We aren't retreating to caves and hunting and gathering, so the question concerns what public policies need we pursue to ensure a sufficiently (not necessarily perfectly) healthy environment for people and wildlife?
906697
Humans have made huge impacts on the physical environment by logging, farming, building, and really just existing. The problem is the rate of change is accelerating as the population grows exponentially and people become industrialised and require more and more. The earth really cannot sustain this growth in all aspects of people greed and need. There is no easy way to slow it let alone stop it.\n\nAs a planet we are doomed! not tomorrow but before this century is out.
97564
There was a time when environment was treated as a bottomless phenomenon. The quantity of consumers was simply trifling before the sheer magnitude of natural resources to be consumed. Management of natural resources such as forests or minerals was done by locals who made use of them. There was no profit motive behind exploiting environmental resources. There were no market forces driving the engines of mass production. Environment was local. It was managed by locals based on local indigenous knowledge. Time as well as modern science has proved that traditional local management of environment and natural resources is the best. Whether it be Indians of Brazil or Africans or Asians, they are the best caretakers of their resources because their knowledge of their environment is time tested. Market forces, profit motive, mass production and modern technology have damaged our natural environment to an alarming extent. Since our attention has been drawn to this damage, we must use modern techniques, modern communication and capital to preserve and improve our natural environment. \n\n\nIndia is equipped with a solid brigade of legal provisions and policy documents designed to protect and improve the natural environment. Article 48(a) directs the State to take strong measures not only for its protection but also work actively for its improvement. Article 51(a) incurs a corresponding duty on the citizen to do the same. We have an Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act and a similar Water Act. We have an Environmental Protection Act of 1986 amended from time to time to control hazardous pollutants. Each one of our nine five year plans contains a chapter on safeguarding the environment. We have Forest Acts stretching from 1861 to 1988. We have State and Central boards for the prevention of pollution. Our Judiciary has been exceptionally active in allowing public interest litigations that have resulted in the State being directed to take measures for its improvement or to refrain from taking measures that would degenerate our ecology. However, the core issues effecting or rather controlling India’s natural environment have remained the same. \nWho should control India’s forest wealth? Should the traditional local tribal manage forest resources with his age-old knowledge reducing the government to a mere assistant? On the other hand, should forests be managed by the Central government? Before the British came to India, forests were the property of locals who survived on them as well as took loving care of them. As British gained control of India, they simply threw the tribal out of this management. Their concern was entirely different. They gave contracts for felling forests and such felling was immense all across Indian sub-continent. They wanted to increase revenue by selling timber and converting forestland into agricultural land. Timber was required for the expansion of railways, construction of bridges and buildings. Right from the forest Act of 1861 till 1927, the British dissociated the local traditional dweller from its management. All these Acts contain a provision of arrest without warrant for anyone who encroached upon forestland without permission from the British officer. Whether it be a cattle grazer or a woman collecting dry wood for fuel. The same practice has continued after independence. Forest wealth has been centralized and the local dweller is as angry with the administration as ever. Since he gets no incentive by protecting his forest, he does not bother about it anymore. Until this issue of local versus government control is resolved, forest resources will continue to be exploited and mismanaged in India. \nWeakness of laws and administrative rules is the second main problem. Laws are not weak by chance. They are left weak deliberately. For example, the boards entrusted with preventing water and air pollution have proved ineffective. Not by chance but because they have not been empowered sufficiently. They
1150328
Education! People have to learn more about pollution and what effects their actions (dumping, buying goods with a lot of packaging etc.) have on the environment. Only then people can act responsibly, reduce waste and recycle and reuse as much as possible.
1136299
u can write that government should ban hunting and many maore things...the future of the upcoming generations is in thier hand ....because NO WILD ANIMALS MEANS MORE HERNBIVORES AND MORE HERBIVORES MEAN LESS PLANTS..LES PLANTS MEAN LESS AIR AND WATER....AND IN THE END NO HUMAN......THIS IS TRUE....PLS ACCEPT MY ANSWER BEST$$$
560087
Protect and respect their habitats.  Help wildlife by building a bird feeder, composting, eliminating the use of pesticides and herbicides, etc.  In your garden use plants native to your area - do not introduce plants that are not native - they may disrupt the natural balance. \n\nPossibly one of the best things we can do is stop demanding so much of the world's resources, which, in one way or another, destroys wildlife habitat - increases global warming, destroys the rain forest, etc.  Use cloth reusable shopping bags to carry home groceries.  Buy at bulk food stores using much less packaging materials.  Recycle as much of what we use as possible - glass, soda cans, food cans, plastic containers, newsprint, etc.  Recycle toys, books, games, clothes, etc. by donating them to goodwill or Salvation Army, and shop for things you need at those stores.  Live a simpler, gentler life style.  \n\nHere are a few sites you may like to view.
440361
beautiful sunny days not too hot and breezy and clean fresh air.  also would depend on the people, species, and other things in the environment.  should be less pollution too.  So there's lots to have a beautiful and wonderful environment and weather in nature.
1041773
to balance the ecosystem
560334
Because people hunt them , and pollute the forest and enviorment.
791714
Here are some sites that may help you:\nhttp://dir.yahoo.com/Society_and_Culture/Environment_and_Nature/Pollution/\nhttp://www.webdirectory.com/Pollution/\nhttp://www.answers.com/topic/pollution\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollution
1014128
We need to learn how to conserve our natural resources in order to have them for the future world poplutaion.  Without these resources, such as water, humans cannot survive.