which of the following is a compound sentence?
543144
The answer is B.  \n\nA compound sentence can be taken apart to form two complete sentences:\n\nSue gave Jim a new racket.  He left for the tennis courts.
712363
It is not a sentence...\n\nBeneath the noted universal concerns there lies a distinctive world view.\n\n Or better yet use a semi colon after the word preceeding but ..then replacing it with however and a comma...like this \n\n" ; however, beneath these universal concerns there lies a distinctive worldview."
54153
The first and third are correct. The first is in future tense. Still acceptable depending on context of the sentence.
820411
the sentence doesn't make sense...It has to be: My dog, Spot, lives for five years and then........-----or My dog, Spot, lived for 5 years..---the problem with the sentence is with it's tense...you can't live for 5 years in the current tense.
640980
Both sentences are grammatically correct when examined alone.\n\nThe first is talking about a situation in the present.  You would use this expression when you give a gift to someone.\n\nThe second is talking about a future situation.  You would use this expression when you were talking about a movie that the other person plans to see in the future.
730570
There are three errors in this sentence. What are they?\n\nThere are only two grammatical errors, so the false statement is the third error.
734271
I see one run on sentence that needs to be split. I also see two others that should be combined into one\n\nThat said, a good writer never pads the piece. The whole idea is to make it as clear & concise as possible. As a writer, the only legitimate way to extend this is to add information.\n\nI just did a search & on the first page I opened & found the answer to your problems - with an "s".. Your info or the web page info is incorrect, one or the other  There was enough other info to expand the reason for the tie.\n\nAfter a quick search, I found additional info & an error you may wish to correct.       This is a much better version than the 3 sentences I wrote earlier, correct? That is what I mean by clear & concise.\n \nYou've done all right so far. just a little more..
604097
actually there are more than 2 types....\n and I'm not kidding..\n but if you want 2....\n i would go with compound and simple...there are some how intersting to read about.
671020
B)a<b\n\n2 Thursdays before the 15th and 3 Thursdays after the 15th.
634079
C.  The predicate is the verb, only question C. has two action words, washed and ironed.  A and B have compound subjects, D has a compound object.
852459
3.) B\n\n6.) B?\n\n8.) B?\n\n9.) A
1177241
the first one was in past tense and the other one is in past progressive tense\nthe meaning is the same. the difference is how the sentence was constructed
1119511
I do not understand your sentence.\nIt should be written:\n"I do not understand why men so love soap operas."\nor as a question:\n"Why do men so love soap operas?"
513990
Question 1 used if three or more things to distinguish. Question 2 used if only 2 things to distinguish
580539
1.) Also I have...  or I also have...\n2.) In my house there is/are...
648431
The only way ı can find any logic in this sentence is if the comma before 'for example' is changed to a semi-colon. Then it's two different sentences and, even if I don't like it, I can parse it.\n\nSo, if that's the case, then it's 'situation', not 'patterns'. Patterns are an aspect of a leaf's form and physiology. You can reword this sentence like this: Leaves develop in different situations; according to these situations, the form and physiology vary.\n\nThis is logical when you look at the example, because 'different degrees of light' are different situations (as someone else said, 'environment' would be more suitable), and the example says that 'different degrees of light' affect how the leaf adapts (preumably altering its shape).\n\nHope this helps. Swat your teacher upside the head for giving you such an ill-formed question!
459291
C. Sandy washed and ironed her clothes\n\nwashed and ironed her clothes is the predicate and the "and" make it compound