What is the difference between a "master web application" & a "local  web application"?
542401
there is no difference
484154
The local administrator has access to system files and folders that the application changes during installation. You can change your access by going to Control Panel, User Accounts.
442804
what operating system are they both running? has it worked before? Were there any recent system changes? I'm thinking it might be a difference in the configuration and all...but I'm not really sure. I need more information to determine the problem.\n\nactually...if it's only certain webpages and all and you've already been there before...it might very well be that those pages are cached (temporarily stored on your hard drive), in that instance...instead of going online to the page, it simply loads from your hard drive instead.\n\ndo a virus scan. also check your firewall settings on that computer. hope that helps
303999
This means there are three possible systems that control the application. A front end (top tier) that displays the graphics to the user. A middle layer (middle tier) that is acting as a broker for user requests and tapping the back end resources like a database. A final back end (bottom tier) is providing data services most likely.\n\nAn example would be the following type of application:\nweb browser <-> An HTTP server <-> A database \nSource(s):\nExperience
13560
There really isn't any difference in describing what you need to a web developer or a software developer. They will both be looking for (if they are worth describing the problem to) in no particular order:\n1. context diagrams that define how the external interfaces interact with your system,\n2. what the requirements (functional, non-functional, constraints) of the system,\n3. a flow chart describing how the user interacts with your front-end,\n4. how you want the data to be stored,\n5. a set of well defined business rules have always helped me,\n6. describe what your vision of the application is, the goals and what you hope to accomplish in the future with it (this will help the developer make strong decisions may affect any future modifications and extensibility of the application).\n\nMy best recommendation to you is to just lay everything and anything you can think of down on the table. Obviously, do it after you've deemed them worthy of the job.
308962
Not necessary.\n\nBut for the ease of maintenance it is useful to keep them segregated into a folder and use a hierarchy to represent their depth.\n\nAlso, if a certain JSP needs to be protected for direct access from outside world, keep it under the WEB-INF folder.
980144
Hi \n\nWell , its the kind of software that lets you manage either another part of the software , remote system or local machine. In otherwords is the part were you make changes to the running sofwares or system that connect to the software
467872
I came to this Q&A late, so you probably have already\ndone the upgrade, but I'll make a couple of comments\nanyway.\n\nFirst, if you have multiple machines supporting an app\nserver, I presume that they're all running both the same\nrelease of the OS as well as the same patches (in order\nto get consistent results regardless of which machine\nprovides the service).  Given that assumption (ie. system\nshared objects are the same), I can't see any point to\nthe suggestion that you must use statically compiled\nbinaries.\n\nI think the other advice is really to the point, because\nit is those little details (like updating environments,\ndocumentation, the "pkgadd" database, or other small\npieces of state information) that could cause you\nheadaches later on. If the upgrade really is strictly\nlimited to modifying one directory, then sure, you can do\nit as you suggest.\n\nI'm curious, though, about your comment about\n"downtime".  If your machines supporting the app server\nare replicated, then it doesn't seem like there would be\n*any* downtime if you took them offline (one at a time)\nfor upgrades.  Isn't that part of the designed-in beauty of\nusing multiple machines?
349453
There isn't much difference. IIS 6 has better support for the ASP.NET framework and certain authentication schemas, such as impersonation and the like, but that's about the only difference I've noted.
280310
The code is usually divided into 2parts : client side and server side. If you use the view source option what you'll get to see is the client side scripts and some of that is also generated by the server side scripts. To get the server side scripts you'll have to ask the developers for it.\n\nHope this answers your question
574121
http://local.live.com/
220900
It's not in ASP, because it's running off FreeBSD with an unknown server:\n\nhttp://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=answers.yahoo.com\n\nMy guess would be this is run via a combination of compiled code, probably written in C++ or similar, with some AJAX components.
57959
Side-by-side programming in .NET is creating applications that use different versions of the .NET framework.\n\nBy default, all (desktop) applications compiled with Visual Studio 2002 use version 1.0 of the .NET Framework, those compiled with Visual Studio 2003 use version 1.1 of the .NET Framework and those compiled with Visual Studio 2005 use version 2.0 of the framework.\n\nASP.NET applications, as of version 1.0 and 1.1 of the framework, required different ASP.NET IIS filters to be used on the site, depending upon the version of the framework the Web application was compiled against.  With the .NET Framework 2.0, individual Web sites can be configured to use either version of the framework through the IIS configuration tool.\n\nSide-by-side execution allows for all versions of the framework to be installed on the computer and the respective applications will use the appropriate versions.  Executable applications which don't use "breaking changes" (or those that no longer work with the newer frameworks) can modify their application configuration file to use different versions of the .NET framework.
292424
download\n\nApache - its a free webserver, then you can run a webserver from the local machine\n\nhttp://apache.org/
502545
you get different kind. ie external and internal attributes.\n\nit depends on the software that u r trying to use.\n\nu can also view this web page.\n\nhttp://research.microsoft.com/~cszypers/events/WCOP2005/08%20-%20Happe%20Firus.pdf
1166413
You don't need it, but it's highly recommended that you install it, as PHP is used with Apache more than any other combination.  \n\nThere are at least a few all in one install packages out there for windows that will install apache, php and mysql together, although installing them seperately is not that difficult, and there are plenty of how-to's out there if you look for them.  I linked one of the all in one packages below.\n\nI run this combination on my laptop, and it works great.  I can write code, and test it whereever I might be.  You use the built-in networking capability known as the loopback device, or as it's usually known:  localhost.  The special localhost IP address is 127.0.0.1.\n\nSo once you get Apache running on your machine you can access your webpace using http://localhost/....
234729
I haven't used it, so I can't attest to its value or functionality, but this is the only thing I've found available to save a web page in Firefox as a single file: The MAF Project.\n================\n\n"The Maf project is an archive extension that allows complete web pages to be saved in a single archive file. MAF stands for Mozilla Archive Format and the extension uses RDF to save page meta-data such as the original URL of the page and the date/time the page was put in the archive."