Asking other women, do you prefer circumcised or uncircumcised men?
552034
Well get ready for this.... i have a boyfriend that ive been with for about 2 years. He is not circumcised. One of the first times we had sex his fore skin broke and there was blood everywhere... i thought it was me at first, as if that would'nt have been bad enough! We always use plenty of lube now and usually we have to use a condom because of it, so as you can see i love him because im still with him but i would have prefered him to be circumcised.
514187
my vote is for uncircumcized. You are more sensitive, just practice good hygiene, circumcision will NOT change the size of your penis!!! Yes most american men are circumcized, but  we are the only country that makes this a 'normal' practice.Hope this helps. My husband is 'uncut' and I wouldn't change it for the world!!!
839546
i have found that men who aren't circumszed (dated 3 of them) are usually bigger than men who are not..but didn't know how to work it... i've been with a guy who had a smaller one than i was used to but knew how to work with it.... sooo size REALLY doesn't matter if you know what you are doing.... and the best sex overall is make-up sex;)
636148
There are lots of circumcised Christians but this is due to a historical ignorance of the foreskin rather than because of any religious beliefs.\n\nThese days there are NO hygenic reasons for circumcision if you bathe at least once a day. There will therefore be no smell. Accusations otherwise are just born out of ignorance. If you consider most of European men, for instance, are uncircumcised, don't you think they would have moved to circumcision en masse long ago if circumcision was the most hygenic and correct thing to do? Any poster who says that it will make your penis 'healthier' is in denial. It is simply untrue and has no medical evidence to back this up.\n\nAnd as for women advocating it, how would you like it if your clitoris was removed without your consent?\n\nAlmost all other reasons for circumcision are now medically treatable and therefore, circumcision is unneccessary.\n\nFor women, an intact penis is DESIGNED to work better that a circumcised one because the foreskin allows for greater movement during sexual intercourse and less lubrication is required.\n\nIt is also better for the man because his glans is soft and sensitive - the glans on circumcised penises gets thick and hard over the years and decreases sensitivity and can even lead to erection problems.\n\nI am writing this as someone who IS circumcised and I am appalled that a fully functional part of me was trimmed off for no real reason and which has, subsequently, given me a less satisfactory sex life than my uncut counterparts.
290236
With, or without as long as proper hygiene is practiced. I guess some women have a more definite preference. It is really more about your feelings for your sexual partner.
1140091
I suppose this is a personal preference.  I think it has came more into vogue as men and women tend to focus on personal hygiene and grooming more and more.  I would think that you should probably ask yourself what you prefer, since ultimately you will be the one living with your body. If you are in a relationship and are considering it to please your partner, it could be a nice surprise.  The good thing is, like any haircut, it can always grow back!
418590
When it's soft it has the skin all the way down - you can't see the "head".  When it's erect it looks the same as a circumcised one.  \nFYI - Un-circumcised feels WAY better, too!
418153
There's not that much point.  It's easier to keep clean - but that's not a good excuse to have it done.  I'm circumcised - seems to work fine for me.  If you're circumcised - great.  If not - fine.  Doesn't really matter.\n\nMost of the guys in the US and Canada are - other places no.  People always like to fit in - so it's probably better to go with whatever is the norm where you live.
230193
Yes, I'm sure, girls do prefer it & enjoy more than with \nun-cicumcised one, becuse the feel with participating inside muscle is always more, sensitive & exciting than its with the covered one. \nAnd for clean oralsex, I think, its the only choice.
134889
Shaved is good sometimes. I like to at least stay trimmed. More comfortable and good for oral.
1033771
hi....well circumcision if done in childhood , makes the glans almost least sensitive to superficial touch when we grow adult...But if done in adulthood then surely you will have hard time as the exposed area shall give you so much pain..\n\nAs far as orgasm is considered, I feel that it should not ideally make any difference if one is circumcised or not...However many people who are circumcisied claim to hold for longer than those who still have fore-skin attached...But I guess that its more of hyped and rumor only as there is no technical study to proove that......I hope that you shall agree with me that there is no meter to measure the orgasm....so its soooo  difficult to answer it exactly..\nBut its also true that I have come across many people who claim that after they got circumcised ,they can do better or longer...coz their tool get lesser sensitive.
971115
I believe it is normal for an uncircumsized man's penis, the head and exposed shaft to be extra sensitive. Most men find this a pleasant feeling.  It seems all he needs to do is pull his foreskin back over the head of his penis before he puts his underwear back on.
1066115
Completely shaved, for both male and female. It is cleaner and I don't know why but my husband loves it like that and after a while I loved having the feeling of being clean all the time. \nSO,\n               SHAVED!
334095
TRUE...Interesting way to put it. \n\n\nIf it wasn't with your peculiar fascination with the uncircumcised - I'd say your pretty insightful ;-)
190778
Both are as good.  Sex is 75% a mental thing and only 25% a physical thing.  \n\nAnd there is not much of a difference between the sensation and arousal one gets whether one is circumcised or not.\n\nSome recommend taping the foreskin back for a few days and treating your penis (including masturbation) as though one is circumcised to get a feel for how it would be to be cut.  Maybe you can try that out - but use common sense and don't do anything to hurt yourself.
576387
It's not strange. That's acutally normal. My man is not circumsized. It's all good. If you are ok with it your lover will be. Just keep it clean.
527892
These days there are NO hygenic reasons for circumcision if you bathe at least once a day. There will therefore be no smell. Accusations otherwise are just born out of ignorance. If you consider most of European men, for instance, are uncircumcised, don't you think they would have moved to circumcision en masse long ago if circumcision was the most hygenic and correct thing to do?\n\nAlmost all other reasons for circumcision are now medically treatable and therefore, circumcision is unneccessary.\n\nFor women, an intact penis is DESIGNED to work better that a circumcised one because the foreskin allows for greater movement during sexual intercourse and less lubrication is required.\n\nIt is also better for the man because his glans is soft and sensitive - the glans on circumcised penises gets thick and hard over the years and decreases sensitivity and can even lead to erection problems.\n\nI am writing this as someone who IS circumcised and I am appalled that a fully functional part of me was trimmed off for no real reason and which has, subsequently, given me a less satisfactory sex life than my uncut counterparts.