Why is it important for defense attorneys to provide a vigorous defense for their clients?
536815
It used to be called "Zealous Advocacy" in the ethical codes.\n\nThe basic idea is that the legal system is adversarial, and that truth is best found when opposing learned individuals vigorously advocate their respective sides of the argument.\n\nThe 6th Amendment also guarantees assistance of counsel, which has been interpreted as effective assistance. Since the prosecutor is likely to be vigorous in seeking conviction (given the nature of the adversarial system), the defense must be equally vigorous.
1117744
they do that because they want to show the judge that there good lawyers. and can point out the person who is lieing and they can win cases.also so they can make you crack and find if you are lieing. also that's their job they base their findings on their cleints memories of incident that took place and that is based on their memories and findings or research.  that's a lawyers job. plus their paid to do that. they also must have good memories cause if they win a case they get more money then they would if they didn't win a lawsuit.PLEASE CHOOSE ME FOR BEST ANWSER!
574763
There is no "most"  every area is different.\n\nfor example in alot of small town rual areas there is no defence attorneys on staff.  Various lawyers in that area are required to take on cases for "free" as part of thier bar members in that area.\n\nIn other places both the DA and the defense attorneys start at somewhere around 30,000 to 40000 a year.\nAnd in general for alot of attorneys, such as bankrutpcy and some other civil attorneys, alot make less than 100,000 a year.\n\nBut the real issue with a public defender there is no funds for expert witness, to have evidence reviewed, to hire speical labs and the such.
928323
There's an old adage that the first client of the criminal defense attorney is the US Constitution.  \n\nMost criminal defense lawyers don't care whether their clients are guilty or not.  They just want to ensure that the police and the prosecutors have done their jobs properly and ensure the criminal justice system is working.  If they lose at trial, but are satisfied the the police and prosecutors did everything by the book, they generally don't take it too hard. If the defense thinks a conviction is imminent, they will generally try a plea bargain to receive a lesser sentence for their client.  Before anyone makes any judgment's about the criminal defense attorney "trying to get his client off with a slap on the wrist", they should also realize that the prosecutor has to agree to the deal, and the judge has to approve it.  So if anyone is ever upset with a plea bargain, they need to realize that if the judge and prosecutor went along with it, its probably in the state's best interest as well.  \n\nBut to answer your question, see below.\n\nABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal\n(a) A lawyer shall not knowingly: \n\n(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer; \n\n(2) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or \n\n(3) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter, that the lawyer reasonably believes is false. \n\n(b) A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. \n\n(c) The duties stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) continue to the conclusion of the proceeding, and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6. \n...\n\nSo if a client confesses guilt to his lawyer, the above rule prohibits the lawyer from putting the client on the stand (refered to as "subornation of perjury").  If the lawyer knows the client is guilty, and the client doesn't plead guilty, the case goes to trial.  At trial, the lawyer can't put the client on the stand, because the lawyer knows the client will lie about his or her innocence once they are on the stand. This is why defense lawyers don't care whether their clients are guilty or not, and why they specifically tell their clients not to tell them if they are guilty or not.  They don't want to know, so they can put them on the stand. \n\nBelieve it or not, this rule is almost never violated.  No lawyer would ever risk losing his license because his or her client is a liar.\n\nAnd remember, OJ didn't take the stand.  Draw your own conclusion....
188565
Prosecutors present incriminating evidence tending to show that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  He can call witnesses, present physical evidence, and cross-examine defense’s witnesses.  Presenting opening and closing arguments, and selecting jurors are also their important functions.
1165281
You shouldn't expect to get a realistic answer from anyone here because no one here (except you, perhaps), knows all the details of your case.  It would take an attorney no small amount of time to prepare a defense for you, and nobody here is going to be able to offer you real help without knowing all the details.  This is one of those situations where Y!A really isn't going to be especially beneficial for you.
409544
Lawyers are motivated by a combination of money and power. Without legal disputes, such as in civil matters, there would be a dramatic decline in the need for those lawyers. So, yes lawyers are trying to make you money but, the bottom line is their pocket-book, not yours!!! So, this is really a catch 22 where both sides can win big but, the lawyers assume lots of risk in civil matters--which in some cases they make NO money, if they lose your dispute. So, before lawyers touch many civil cases they will pose some really important questions, i.e, is this a winnable case and is this worth my time--considering how much I (lawyer) could potentially earn?\n\nCivil law is still a popular area of law but, there is a huge need now for immigration lawyers. So, if law is your interest then consider that area.
859653
Actually that's pretty simple. It is to help the defendant! It helps to keep people from being charged fraudulently or carelessly. It is a deterrence method, basically.
867599
What an inticing offer for any attorney- since they usually have lots of free time.
1104402
They might not be as competent...this is true.  But all attorneys take an oath to represent their clients to the best of their ability.  Their competency will depend on their experience...and their passion.  Your brother would be smart to be very proactive...participate as much as he can..give as much information, ask as many questions as he can..help in his defense.
869932
A phrase commonly applied to counsel employed to assist in the preparation or management of the case, or its presentation on appeal, but who is not the principal attorney for the party.\n\nI work for a corporate law firm and our of counsel attorneys assist with cases like associates do, however, they have many more years of experience, meaning their rates are higher, and they also can be the attorney in charge of clients like partners of the firm.\n\nTo me, they are between the associate and partner positions, in so many words.  They assist with cases, but they also bring in clients as their own.
771752
Sure,happens all the time. Thats why good defense attorneys make the big bucks, he knows how to manipulate the system to circumvent any guilt and cause doubt in the jurys minds. Look at OJ Simpson and others. Basically it comes down to the more money you have the less guilty you are. Client-attorney privledge prevents any true fact between them from being known to anyone else. Another one of the fine perks of our legal system.
280775
Defense attorneys present exculpating evidence showing their client is innocent, or to create reasonable doubts in the jurors’ minds.  They can present witnesses and physical evidence, as well as cross-examine prosecution’s witnesses.  They would also provide an opening and closing argument, as well as select jurors that they think would be sympathetic to their clients.
575863
This is a legal question and should be referred to an attorney who specializes in these types of matters.
657493
To keep attorneys employeed.\n\nBut seriously, criminal law is based on the presumption that your are innocent until proven guilty.  It is also to help protect the rights of the victim as well as the defendant.  \n\nYes, it's imperfect, but it's the best system going.  Like people and society, it is a constantly changing system.  The concept of being judged by ones peers is one of the strong points.  Fate should not be decided on one person's opinion.
1144713
There is no yes/no answer to your question.\n\nOnly your friend's attorney is in a position to give you specific advice.\n\nAnything that causes the prosecution to produce evidence would seemingly help the defendant. But, only if the evidence exonerates him.
815854
Of course I approve. If we didn't have lawyers then you could be arrested and tried for anything without a defense. Everyone is entitled to a defense. What if you were innocent? Your lawyer would be your best friend and only friend in some cases.