What do you think of CNBC's "Conversations with Michael Eisner"?
548351
I'd rather watch a rerun of my family.
779559
it was pretty interesting. good acting, interesting plot, somehow it didnt nail it though.\n\ni didnt figure out the plot at all. i was still stumped why hoffman would keep talking to ferrell. i figure'd he write him off as a nutjob.
1182539
I saw that story on CBS a week and a half ago. I applaud him for taking a step in the right (or left, as the case may be) direction. It is, however, not the largest, but the 2nd largest, behind the Great Barrier Reef. It is the largest in America.\n\nOf course, the "big story" that everyone is covering, Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's wedding, is infinitely more important <dripping with sarcasm>.\n\nKnitmama said it better than I did...
805664
urgh I hate it\nI saw one today \nit was the typical \n4 times a billion over 9 times the square of the atoms in a cherry or something\nits obvious it's a scam\nI've never ever seen anybody win and even If they did, I wouldn't be surprised if the b******s hung up on them before they could claim the cash.\n\nand the presenters- get some personalities!
755777
I thought it was a total let down.\n\nFirst...the commentary was poor. Bryant Gumble should have stuck with the reporting the news. He is average at best.  \n\nSecond...we have the NFL network, but it is not broadcasted in HD. After watching all the games this season in High Definition, watching this game without it was a total let down. \n\nFinally, I have heard from quite a few friends around the US that complained that they could not even get the game. I think the idea of having a network dedicated to the NFL is a good idea, but I think that the network is just not ready to support live games at this point.
1166542
I think it is compelling but can be nothing more than hype.\n\nA lot of the information they present is provocative but can be easily explained.\n\nThere is some issues though that make you go Hmmm....\n\nThe biggest is the fact that there was one little whole in the pentagon when there should have been a great big gaping section missing.
489244
I haven't seen it and don't really know if I have an interest in it.\n\nI think it is basically a telling of the "popular" version of what happened and I have seen Loose Change.\n\nWhen you start asking questions about "what is the most currenty information we have about the attack?", you really have to define who WE are. I think not everyone who really knows what happened is dead.\n\nIt's good to ask questions, even if it's dangerous. History takes a long time to let the truth slip.
1101147
I love his show on CBS!  I've watched him since he was on Oprah on Tuesdays & when he announced his own show on NBC 3 years ago, I was ecstatic.  Some shows don't interest me so I change the channel.  For the most part, he knows his stuff & is a great source of information on a lot of different topics.
1029300
Haven't seen it, yet. Ebert & Roeper gave it thumbs up last \nweek. They also said that in comparison with the limited of \nnumber of theaters it opened in, it did better than what ever \nwas number one.\n\nGlobal warming - I've seen pics of the ice caps 10 yrs. ago, & \ntoday - they are obviously melting. The disturbing thing are the\nphotos of the thinning polar bears. Less ice, means less prey\nfor them to eat. It also means less cubs.
1145186
A journalist asked this to Noel during an interview and Noel said 'No'.  However he did say that the Banker was a funny man and that when there are nice woman in the hotseat the Banker makes remarks that Noel can't repeat, so watch out for Noel laugh when he is on the phone to the banker and there is a woman in the hotseat!!
802087
Cool.\n\nIt didn't sell.....\n\n>snerk<
365740
Commander in Chief is coming back on this Thursday. 10:pm my\ntime,check your listings. Supposedto be pretty good,The Chief's hubby is accused of drinkin too much and something about some pictures. HMM,sounds good to me.
1069284
It was an excellent show, although I enjoyed the documentary The Queen at 80 that was shown on the 18th more. It was an interesting look behind the scenes, although they could have put more history behind royal portraits. I do have to admire Rolf's enthusiasm, and seeing the process behind the portrait. \n\nThere's a special on the 27th of June with Scott Thompson called Pop Up Royals (or something like that) and I'm looking forward to seeing that too.
494483
Sure I will. Tom Hanks is a great actor.  The story line is fiction.  Sure in the preface Dan Brown makes a fool of himself by making false claims, but he states the story line is fiction.  If as a Christian I'd go and see Mission Impossible Three, surely i'd view the Davinci Code.  In fact, I look forward to seeing it.\n\nAnd further more, even if the book is "hersey", you can't argue with the results.  Whether or not Dan Brown intended it, more people are seeking out the truth behind the book and finding Constantine and the real Gospel.  I think God works in some powerful ways...\n\nPlus, the movie itself opens up a whole new area of witness that can be used for ministry.  We are called to be able to provide an answer for our faith.  If a non-believer's question comes from something within the film, i'd like to be able to give him a clear answer.
623259
There is an old addage that says something about truth and humor. Whaaattt???? Not my exclusive source but I like his interpretations and observations.\n\nHe is far from radical and has a very realistic view. I've seen CNN and even Fox news air clips from his show. Stuff they won't directly say. Thier getting thier news and commentary from him. Sometimes.
410353
This is just my personel opinion, but I don't think its a good company, I think its a horrible company.  \n\nLooking at the fundamentals, its revenue has grown about 270% in the past year, of course this is a phenomenally good growth rate, but in $ terms it went up about 175 million (from 67 million to 242 million).  During the past year their net loss was 862 million and its increasing too (albeit not as fast as revenue) and stands at almost 4 times revenue for the past quarter.  It could be 10 years (or never) before these guys make a profit, and they will have to dilute their shares (ie issue more shares to raise cash) before then.\n\nTo make matters even worse, their stock price peaked (at almost 8$ per share in early December) and has been trending sharply down since then, so even from a technical point of view they look terrible.\n\nSo, we have a fantastic growth rate but utterly terrible fundamentals and technicals, whats to like.\n\nAgain, just one opinion.
455203
If you have cable TV on your computer than you can, if not you have to check out CNBC on the days it comes on.  Also, you may be able to download previous episodes off limewire or the internet.  Goodluck!