Why do LIBERALS give AID AND COMFORT TO OUR ENEMIES?
539288
If you call them on the lies they are using to try to get their power back, they crawfish a little, or jump behind the First Amendment and complain about being called "Unpatriotic". Appeasement didn't work on Hitler in 1938, and it won't work on today's Islamofascists. If the Liberals get their way, this country could very well go under. Then we'd see them scream and piss themselves when they are having their heads removed with a dull knife.
252462
conservatives like to talk, liberals take action...\n\nTHANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU!
507480
Sorry proff, but is all about enriching ones self, you seen the one above me. Liberals are the scum of the earth because they care about people, it is wrong to care about anybody but yourself. I personally have seen both sides and I can't be so callus, maybe that is why I am a democrat. I think if you have a pile of boxes and you want to move them it is better to lift from the bottom that way you move all three boxes but if you lift from the top as the repuglicans do then all you lift is the top.
1021718
You're half right, Hon.  We give aide to countries that hate us because we are civil.  The war is not about oil.  It's about women's rights, the chance to give a fascist society controlled by dictators a chance at democracy in hopes that they will become peaceful and not want to kill us.  Terrorism is not a joke, and it's very real.  If we pull out now our national security is at stake.  \n\nThis war gives the people in Iraq and Afghanistan the opportunity to provide a future and a life for their grandchildren.  If we can give them that, then why would they want to harm us.  In the history of the world, no two democratic nations have been in a war.  \n\nRevenue in the stock market and the economy is up.  Unemployment is down.  There is a plan in effect (budgeted by GW Bush) that will erase the national deficit in less than 3 years.  \n\nAs far as sending foreign aide overseas while our children starve... thank the libs for that.  They're so concerned with social programs like welfare and affirmative action, that they've lost sight of what is right and true.
791863
They aren't understood; they are manipulated for political purposes. Currently, the Reps do it more...labeling liberalism as something so bad.
1012676
It's all about greed, power and self righteousness.\nMedia blasts us with biased information (if we listen to Liberal radio, TV and websites we get an anti Con message and visa verse).  This disinformation actually "uneducates" us spreading hate and intolerance just as uneducated people tend to be racists and bigots. \n\nLiberals will say that conservatives are greedy because they want to keep the money they have worked so hard to get and distribute it the way they see fit ie the government should control your bank account.Basically "what's mine is mine whats yours is mine." \nMost conservatives support many charities but they are charities that they choose. "What's mine is mine."\n\nConservatives think liberals "hate this country" simply because they voice their disdain of the current president and GOP congress. And fear that the Liberals will take the money they worked so hard for just to give to someone else.\n\nThe fundamental of each party have skewn together GOP used to want a smaller government but support "moral laws" while Liberals want bigger government yet taught personal liberties.  \n\nIt will not end, political differences have been around since the dawn of man and woman.
1019210
Evil liberals would be my enemy, as would evil conservatives. I consider myself a good liberal. Evil invades all segments of our society, liberal or conservative. If you are a conservative, then most liberals would be nothing more than an opposing viewpoint. Are you angry that not everyone agrees with you? Saying that ALL liberals are evil is akin to saying ALL conservatives are religious radicals (think Taliban and bin Laden).
738361
It seems to me so, they seek defeat rather than look for victory.  You can see it in their speeches and their post.  They would rather have a loss no matter what the damage to our intenational immage might be.  It is plain and simple when the going gets tough, their motto is to quit.  And unfortunatly that is what our enemies are counting on and it seems the libs are bound and determined to deliver.
1140046
As liberals have told you time and again, they are better than you. You can't tell them that the Emperor has no clothes they will attack you as they always do. They put forth their human shields to avoid ridicule and won't get dirty in the Arena of ideas because Liberals are selective in which venue they operate. Hilary won't go on Fox for example.Teddy won't either. Heretics like us are sons of satan to them. When you argue, let them cuss first, that is an indication that you bested them. LOL
1128695
Some people try to empower themselves by using derogatory expletives and "name calling". They do it from a fear of being suppressed or from knowing they have no rational answers for those who oppose them. It would be better if non-liberals could debate the liberal  "ideas", but since most liberals are sheep and follow the flock, their ideas become generic without purpose and meaning. Liberal "extremists", like most extremists", make a habit of being argumentive by nature. Most people who debate them, are usually self thinkers with good self-esteem who can communicate powerfully  without the name calling. I call these people conservatives and moderates, not extremists
64563
Not in the event of war ,i.e. (War on terrorism).. The liberals are really trying to get this one to stick, but I'm tellin' ya right now.. This dog ain't gonna hunt.. The lefties need to go find another pseudo-crisis to whine about..
993100
That is a very good question! I have wondered that my self. Be careful now, you know their gonna get mad. I feel I must walk on eggshells around those Libs. But I don't.
930390
The Liberals probably support YA! lol
1177176
Deep down inside liberals know that they are not loyal to their country, respectful of its institutions, and that Ann Coulter is right in her criticisms of liberals.  They listen to her to find out the truth, then run around in a tizzy telling each other we can't be as bad as she says we are.
496056
I think the reason is that liberals believe that man is capable of being perfect without anybody's help. They think that all it takes is education. This is the reason behind much of their supposedly self-righteous anger at anybody who seems to diagree with them:\n\n"I've just explained my position to this person, and he disagrees! Since I can't possibly be mistaken, he might simply be too stupid to understand. I'll be patient and give him a second chance."\n\n(After explaining a second time,)\n\n"I've just explained my position to this person who was pretending to be honestly curious and he STILL disagrees! Since I can't possibly be mistaken, and he doesn't seem to stupid to understanmd, he must be DELIBERATELY pretending to be dumb in order to waste my time! That makes him a CAD as well as a HERETIC! What's more, he knows EXACTLY how much what he says and does irritates me, AND HE'S DOING IT ON PURPOSE!"\n\nThe above assumptions cover most if not quite all of the liberal position. People are not born liberal. What kind of person does it require to take an innocent child and turn them into a liberal...? I will tell you what kind of person you need. It takes a villain.\n\nYou correctly point out that liberals are dissatisfied with Christ, this is because they largely do not have a personal sense of sin. They see no need or a Savior, they do not recognize the moral response of guilt (" 'laws' are for the governed, not for the governor") and they have lost all sense of shame.\n\nLiberals appear to recognize guilt only as a means of manipulating people; they will not admit to a real sense of moral guilt because that would be to recognize a standard be behavior above themselves. They respond to attempts to put them on the same footing with the rest of the world as attempts to shame them, and their pride will not allow them to admit that they might be mistaken. So they castigate those who would criticise them, at the same time hurling terrible and vicious attacks against their opponents, in an attempt to shame their opponents. \n\nBecause they do not realize that there must be a basis to moral accusations, their attacks are largely built on emotional appeal, and are factually invalid.\n\nThis unyeilding effort to block all sense of personal responsiblity has its parallel in an individual psychological response, called malignant narcissism.\n\nMalignant narcissism was first described by a psychologist and author Dr. M. Scott Peck in his books The Road Less Traveled, and others. He describes the resistance of some hideously selfish people to recognize their own selfishness. This was his attempt to describe the moral condition traditionally called 'evil', in psychological terms. When faced with the 'good', evil must destroy it or be forced to face its own selfishness.\n\nIn American liberalism to day, I believe that we see malignant narcissism raised to the institutional level.\n\nThe group behavior of people may be either better or worse than their individual behavior. Among Christians we recognize that we ought to continue to assemble together on a regular basis becuse we will stimulate each other to love and good works more than if we do not meet regularly.\n\nAnd, we have (unfortunately almost daily in the news) seen reports of troublemakers who, egged on by their peers, commit even more heinous acts of violence and selfishness than they would have stooped to without such provocation. What makes organized crime and gang activity so bad and so dangerous to the community is the fact that it is organized. Organization is a 'good', which was made and intended to serve other goods. It is terrible that it has been coopted and enslaved to serve evil.\n\nSo it is with liberalism in America today. (By the way, I  hope nobody has misunderstood-- this is political liberalism I am talking about. Liberal Christians are a different matter, in terms
710106
The libs hope we lose the war on terror, because that will weaken the USA and usher in what they really want  worldwide socialism led by the UN. In the liberal mind, the USA is evil, and has to be weakened so that the UN and Hillary Clinton can rule the world in socialist utopia, led by John F. Kerry diplomacy and cowardice. What they fail to realize is, the enemy jihadist won't stop at a peace accord.
1108918
Don't you dare. I don't want to support you, I have enough trouble supporting myself and all the other lazy people on it. Don't get me wrong, I AM liberal, however, it should be MY CHOICE who I want to give help to, I shouldn't have to pay into it by force.