what basic intervention modes are available to government to influence the way in which land is used?
535666
(a) The government should survey the businesses and/or area  homeowners, then build structures based upon that need.   (b) To know or have a friend in high-places, or become "BUDDY-BUDDIES" with several select members of the City's Zoning Commission, (who would also know our President, just in case a special CONSTRUCTION favor was needed).\n\n*Zoning: "...This commission, separates or divides municipalities into districts for the purpose of regulating, controlling or in some way limiting the use of the property, and the construction and/or structural nature of buildings, erected within the zones established...."(1) \n\nTo Intervene or Not to Intervene?  You would think our government already knows the answer here;  as our land has already been overdeveloped and our inhabitants voices have gone unheard.  What purpose(s) will the land be used for?  What about a 4-story development building recently erected, that currently blocks a homeowners view.  Did the homeowner have a voice to approve or disapprove the construction?   Was the land/structure used for or against it's inhabitants, would be my question, to you?
316314
A few rules to rule a country.&#92;\nWho has the biggest guns.\nWho has the most money.\nWho can geographically own the most land.\nHow one uses his or her leadership.
876766
by participating in the government\nvoting to make changes
3622
First, you must acquire territory.  Since all territory on the Earth is currently affiliated with a country, you would need to either buy it or take it by force.  \n\nAlternately, you could attempt to form an artificial island in international waters (no one owns the sea out about 10 miles from land.)  This has actually been done- google "Sealand."\n\nThen you must be able to defend it.  This can be done by either forming and maintaining your own military (this is the ususal way) or by getting other countries to protect you.  Monaco and Luxembourg are both tiny countries with no real military power, but if anyone invades them NATO allies will probably stop that (because, really- why beat up on Monaco?)  Sealand, for instance, was attacked several times.\n\nYou will also need some citizens and a form of government (republicanism, communism, democracy etc.) \n\nFinally, you need a sustainable economy- your people have to do something to support themselves and your government.
186613
through:  prescription (adversely, according to state law), necessity, for consideration, etc.\n\nonce and easement exists it will run with the land.  \n\nIf you're curious about a specific situation you should give details.
1006880
You don't have to ask me twice----yes !!!!!!\n\nI would like to see land for wildlife and parks. I would like to know we can support the people here with food if we had too.  And there  would be enough grazing land for lifestock . And Medical for all.   And a place for all to rest.\n\nThis country is a mess of its own problems-and closing that door for a few years would help.\n\nSorry for my crude English.
71903
Contact the local media and elected officials, they may have some influence.
128840
Annexation of territory or making sure you have access to strategic fuel deposits. Establishing forward airbases and a military prescence so you can strike your enemies easily or influence policy in a region.
5560
Eminent Domain (not iminent)is when the government can control the use of land directly by acquiring the property itself and exercising the prerogatives towards it. If the current ownr of the land is unwilling to sell, the government, unlike private individuals, can judically compel its transfer through an eminent domain or condemnation action. \n\nThe government must prove that there is a "public use" involved. In other words, the use of the land as to what best serves the public.\n\nThe government is required to pay just compensation for the land taken. This amount is set by a jury after an evidentary hearing.
344477
Different countries have claims on settlements there but no one actually owns/governs it.\nLooks like Australia, Chile, Argentina, UK, France and New Zealand claim to own sections of it.
448179
Imperialism is the belief that it i desirable to  extend country's influence though any means such as trade, diplomacy, and military conquest.   If you did not, other countries would and chock off your resources. You could not expand and maintain your economy,\n\nThis was the time of the JP Morgan and other Industrialist.
51140
start with your own government, brown nose all the officials.  though it's tough, no action leave to, well, no....action.
985049
You might learn a lot from this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization\nI think the borders were more a part of the monarchy's decision to allow for different parties to control different areas as they gradually made their way on to the continent
167685
try the goverment,the have all sorts of programmes.
474831
This site has useful information.\nhttp://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/atlas/atlas_html/foreword/internationalAgreements.html
911656
no,  there is no negotiation w/ the govt.,you have to fight tooth and nail. and it helps if your neighbors help you too.  there is a story of eminent domain in the reader's digest, look it up maybe it can help you
287801
To develop we need to streamline so we need Business Process Re Engineering. Of course your land has to free and ready for it all. If it's a country where war rages then you would social process re engeering, if that exists. I think in a country like India - go for it