who thinks Conan O'Brien should die?
552172
I agree with Twinkie...this "do not kill" talk is indeed rubbish.  \nYou may have noticed by now the vast amount of replies you have recieved defending the sacred and dear life of comedic genious Mr. Conan Christopher O'Brien.\nThere is no denying that a revolution has started!  Conan fans everywhere will rise up and bring you down! I advise you to go out and enjoy what is left of your life NOW...before it is too late.    \n\n\n\n(I've said too much)
1012782
I agree. We have to organize, mobilize, raise hell, and vote the fascists out of office. The three stooges reign is coming to an end and their day of reckoning will soon be here. They should be put on trial for their crimes against humanity.
846818
Definitely Taz.  My kids would be so entertained and would love him to death.  Plus I wouldn't trust Sylvester!!  I just don't like him.
530012
Are you implying that Conan O'Brien isn't God?
853192
No, I think he should be put in prison for the rest of his life.  Maximum security would be the worst punishment for him - worst than the death penalty.
1144197
nope. i believe that all murderers should die. i dont wanna spend my tax dollars on their jail cell for longer than i have to. plus, what the criminals did was barbaric. shouldn't they get a barbaric punishment for what they did?
1034171
He should execute.\nBut before that I prefer to listening/watching his advocacy about a lot of other subjects including, Iran-Iraq war, His supporters during the war, Chemical weapons that used during the war against Iranian and Iraqis, Slaughter innocent people during his regime, etc.\nThis court is wasting time just for one of his slaughters and I'm worrying about other crimes. It seems they don't want to plead them in the court.
149559
I would like to see him brought back here to the US where we can put him on trial. A trial with brief breaks for chevy and pepsi commercials. Then I would like to stay up late one night to hear that at one minute after midnight a deadly cocktail was injected into his veins and he was pronounced dead shortly after. Then I think we should bury him in a shallow grave below a christian cross somewhere in a walmart parking lot where people are encouraged to come and spit upon his nasty ass soul.
1020895
Arnold is in over his head.\n\nHe obviously thought he could get his agenda through by popularity, and there was hope that his wife would influence him.\n\nBut in the end he just played the role of the Conservative, cutting things the majority of Californians want.\n\nRemember that he got less than half the votes for govener in the pluraty of the recall election......and boy do they regret it.\n\n\nHe should make Conan Three and then retire....
1069867
Everyone needs a vacation. If your people killed my kid, I would let you die. \nOh, yah this $&!% is made up. He is a hoax.
829266
i think he should have just been kept alive n let 2 rot in jail so his conscious would prick him (if he ever had one)\n\nbut i think its necessary to kill bush right away the longer he lives the longer we all suffer
1012060
Answerman's gotta point. Sure, we all know that even Jessica Simpson would make a better president, but he's not evil, he's just very, very stupid. To kill him would be to say that ignorance is a rightful reason to die.\n\n...but if it did happen, my first guess is a member of the Common Sense party(lol).
1183212
He is everyone here that has read the book say he is dead. I believe them. Don't you?
841330
I think a hanging is enough. I wonder what he's thinking too. Do you think he's scared of death after all the deaths he order for all those people? Do you think a man who sentence hundreds of thousands of people to die by poisonous gas in their own towns deserves an easy death such as hanging? victims of the gallows die instantly 99% of the time. The peopel he killed died after hours of vomitting up their insides, foaming at the mouth, and finally violent convulsions and intense pain.\n\nI guess it's a tad bit ironic that a man who cause so much death and probably killed a few himself would be afraid to die. Maybe he thinks he is better in some way than all those people who died. Maybe he feels he deserves life more than those people do. What causes that?
931445
Yes, he should.\nBut it would have been better if he had pulled a Hitler and killed himself so no one would have to execute him.\n\nAs for Michael K's remarks, they predicted the same thing before Hussein was found guilty, and they were wrong.
425791
hell no and he better go to hell!and if he doesn't then i will make sure he does by killing him myself for wut he did.Go To HELL Osama Bin Laden!
64009
I have an answer of a scholar that thinks that O'Brien is wrong (Oct 1996):\n\nCounter Points:\nJefferson scholar Douglas L. Wilson responds to Conor Cruise O'Brien\n\n\n\nConor Cruise O'Brien, in "Thomas Jefferson: Radical and Racist" (October, 1996, Atlantic), apparently believes that Jefferson deserves to be demonized and disavowed by the American people because of "two major factors": "challenges to the authority of the federal government and the race issue."\n\nSee "Thomas Jefferson and the Character Issue" by Douglas L. Wilson, from the November, 1992, Atlantic.\nMr. O'Brien seems to believe that Jefferson is the inspiration for, and therefore somehow ultimately responsible for, contemporary acts of lawlessness and terrorism, a perception that was apparently confirmed for him when the news media reported last winter that a suspect in the Oklahoma City bombing wore, at the time of his arrest, a T-shirt emblazoned with a Jefferson quotation: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." But it also seems clear that Mr. O'Brien's grievance against Jefferson is much deeper and of longer standing.\n\nJefferson's besetting sin, by Mr. O'Brien's lights, is that he was not a "Burkean." Mr. O'Brien is said to have been deeply affected by the life and example of the eighteenth-century statesman Edmund Burke, whose biography he regards as his crowning achievement. He quotes admiringly Burke's cautionary words on the early phase of the French Revolution: "the wild gas, the fixed air is plainly broke loose: but we ought to suspend our judgement until the first effervescence is a little subsided, till the liquor is cleared, and until we see something deeper than the agitation of a troubled and frothy surface." In other words, the proof will be in the pudding, and unless the Revolution produces order and good government, it will not be a blessing. Mr. O'Brien assures us that George Washington, John Adams, and Alexander Hamilton, the other great American founders, "were all spiritually Burkeans; so was Madison, while he worked with Hamilton on the Federalist papers and before he fell under the Jeffersonian spell." Jefferson, he says, is different, because "the liberty that Jefferson adored is not a liberty 'combined' with all those tedious Burkean things, as in the Constitution, but a wild liberty, absolute, untrammeled, universal. . . ." "The other Founders saw the Declaration as embodying generalities that would at a later stage need to be combined with and confined by practical considerations. But Jefferson saw the principles of the Declaration as transcendent truths of which he himself, as author of the Declaration, was also the destined and authoritative interpreter." He was, in Mr. O'Brien's view, intoxicated with the wild gas of liberty.\n\nBut what is the evidence for this view of Jefferson? Mr. O'Brien would have us conclude that because Jefferson defended a band of farmers in western Massachusetts -- who, a few years after the Revolution, armed themselves and defied the state government -- he therefore sanctioned armed rebellion against the federal government. But of course he did not. In the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 he secretly tried to promote the idea of defeating unconstitutional laws, such as the Alien and Sedition acts, by having the individual states nullify and refuse to enforce them. If he believed that the answer to unconstitutional laws and other betrayals of the Constitution was armed rebellion, he missed a perfect occasion for saying so.\n\n\nThe "Tree of Liberty" Letter\n\nThe key text for Mr. O'Brien's case is the provocative "tree of liberty" letter, but he offers no analysis or extensive look at it -- for good reason. Mr. O'Brien knows that, particularly wher