conflict between person vs person in the novel of Death Watch?
541750
srry hardeep\ni don't know otherwise i would help you
12595
There is no specific person.... it is simply a neutral narrator. Keep in mind Orwell wrote this in the form of an allegory, so there isn't a particular character telling us the story at all.
396093
Check out this site: http://dehai.org/conflict/
219144
Thats a pretty philosophical question... I would say the individual has the right to do whatever he or she wishes so long as it does not harm another person in the group.  When there is a conflict, there needs to be an impartial mediator who can determine who is being harmed or benefited more by a certain action.  Definately there is a huge grey zone where one person benefits from the hardships of another, and I think the degree of gain/ suffer must be assessed on a per case basis.
310352
Spoiler warning!\n\nSolution is given in the source links below.
107472
Well, we had an assignment that is like this one about the Scarlet Letter, there are a couple of themes in the story, Individual vs. Society, Nature vs. Society, and I think the other is individual vs. Self. According to my notes the Scarlet letter's themes are sin, knowledge, and the human condition. But anyways in the individual vs. society section there are three examples one is Society against Hester. (they dont like hester for sinning) the other is Society agains Pearl (people think that since Pearl is a sin born daughter she will also be a sinner) and lastly is Dimmsdale(Society thinks that he is a saint). Oh yeah another one could be society against Chillingworth (people think that he is bad and resembles the devil). FOr the nature vs. Society section you can say that there is a BIG difference between both since Dimmsdale acts one way with Pearl and Hester in the forest but another in the village.
803293
I find that they have a few similarities. You have to look beyond the book to see a few things. For example: The monster is called a daemon, reeking havoc everywhere. Killing people here and there. Yes he is a daemon, but have you ever thought of Victor being the daemon? He plays God by creating a "human being" of his own. Which brings to the whole theme of the novel 'Playing God". He defies God. Isn't that daemonic on it's own? \n\nAnother example is hatred. Victor may not show this personality much, but you can see it when he has created his "perfect creation". His overjoyed personality in this instance came to a stop when he has seen how terrible and monstrous his creation became. Due to his hatred, he left his creation hanging. The monster, on the other hand, shows hatred towards his 'God'(Victor). This is all because of his 'God" did not take care of him like how our God takes care of us. His hatred spread to revenge. Here is where the killing began.\n\n"That's all i can help with. My exam for Literature just passed. And I did Frankenstein. But kind of forgotten everything. It will help if you do footnotes on the two characters. Do a contrast and comparison. The themes could help you too."
177494
I would say that betrayal and revenge are consistent in Poe's work.  I'm thinking of The Masque Of The Red Death, The Cask Of Amontillado, and The Tell-Tale Heart.\nDeath would be the issue.  Revenge being the cause.  In the Red Death, the revenge is quite ironic, as it is lower and middle class society exacting its revenge on the upper-class.  At least that's how I see it.
1101063
"Dead people's words and some books. . . ."\n\nI think you answered your own question.
672200
got this off sparknotes, maybe it will help\n\n\nPerception\nTen of The Chosen’s eighteen chapters conclude with references to eyes, seeing, watching, looking, or listening. Perception and vision is the novel’s dominant motif, bridging the entire text from Reuven’s eye injury at the beginning to the final passage, in which Reuven watches Danny walk away after perceiving an “almost blinding” “light” in Danny’s eyes. Vision in the novel symbolizes the ability to see the world, to see oneself, and to see beneath the surface and into the heart of a matter. As Danny and Reuven mature over the course of the novel, they develop clearer pictures of themselves and of the world around them.\nAfter Reuven’s eye accident, he remarks that “everything looks different.” His experience in the hospital gives him a newfound appreciation of his own health. Later, his friendship with Danny teaches him to look beyond superficial appearances. Their friendship broadens and deepens Reuven’s perception of the world and allows him to relate to and empathize with others’ suffering.\nAs the novel progresses, Potok focuses on other senses besides vision. In Chapter 7, Reb Saunders scolds Danny for hearing but not listening. When Danny reads in the library, he covers his ears to block out sound. As Danny’s friendship with Reuven develops, he learns to be a better listener. As a result of Danny’s experience with silence—which parallels Reuven’s experience with blindness—Danny learns to appreciate words. Furthermore, Reuven’s development is apparent in his descriptive language, which becomes more specific throughout the novel. As he becomes more aware of the world around him, his descriptions become more detailed, displaying Reuven’s improved command of his senses. The novel’s final passage mentions four of the five senses, showing the development both Reuven and Danny have experienced over the course of the novel.
591696
The English Patient....when he finds his love has died in a cave, he takes her up in his plane and crashes it.....\n\nBraveheart.......when his bride Marren had her throat slit and he goes for revenge...the deadness in his eyes, he didn't care whether he lived or died\n....and of course his death scene where they  quartered him and he sees his wife's ghost in the crowd smiling at him.\n\nI'm just such a schmuck for stuff like this....
339579
Well I have a split personality, so I can be both!\n*whispers to the night watchman*(is that politcally correct enough to keep from getting a violation?)
895702
You bet - My life, or the person? I choose my life over the person doing me harm. I choose the life of a loved one over the person trying to do them harm. \n\nI own two guns and if someone comes into my home,  I'll see it as a direct threat.
271894
He was both to different people. There is no accurate answer to it.
720945
In the novel as well as in the drama, it is human nature and human action that we see. The difference between these sorts of fiction lies not merely in their outward form; not merely in the circumstance that the personages of the one are made to speak, while those of the other have commonly their history narrated. Unfortunately many dramas are but novels, which proceed by dialogue; and it would not be impossible to write a drama in the shape of letters\nhttp://www.bartleby.com/314/507.html
380343
Killing a king may start a war, depends on the king i suppose.  If he's the war monger, then the war would probably end.
528180
Pretty much the quote states that even the more powerful people in the world make mistakes and aren't always correct in their ways of solving problems.  And that a truly good person would be able to see that they're way isn't the right way and will allow other solutions to the problem, as long as the problem gets resolved peacefully.  And that the worst thing a person can do is be too proud to take someone else's advice.  In Antigone, her father I believe (it's been a while since I read this) is so set in his ways and believing he's right, that he won't see things from Antigone's point of view.  Due to his pride, it results in his daughter's death (I'm pretty sure she dies in this), which is not an affective solution to the problem.  I'm sorry I can't remember quotes and things of that sort.  But I hope I put you on the right track!  Good luck!