Will you see this in the mainstream media day in and day out like the Barbaro story?
554384
We are way too easy on those who decise to abuse children. Here is my answer to these people who abuse our loved ones\nSex Offender Legislation “Wish List” \n1-GPS and lifetime supervision/treatment Law The failure of today's solutions regarding sexual offenders is because we are stuck in the strategy of “public notification” rather than “controlling offenders”. The current model puts the burden on parents rather than offenders, and makes the wrong people work to prevent abuse. Remotely (GPS) knowing where an offender is at all times throughout his lifetime can help to prevent that offender from creating new cases of sexual abuse.\n2-Include all known offenders in the management plan-for life. It is wrong to include just those under supervision since the Meagan’s Law was written. People do not ever age out of this behavior so why an old is charge less important than a new charge. Sexual offences are the most under reported crimes (according to the FBI). The fact that a molester has not been arrested recently does not necessarily means he has not offended.  In my opinion all offenders should be included in any plan, regardless of when their offense occurred. I believe some states have done this already. \n3-Put all offenders , levels I, II or III on the website . I believe Florida does this. The leveling tool is very poor and pedophiles often end up with only a level I because they did not use force, and they superficially complied  with treatment. The way the leveling system works pedophilic “groomers” who do not use force (and are the most busy of all offenders with hundreds of victims) are often not level III’s and therefore are able to have their offense relatively unknown. In New York for example offenders can lawyer up and reduce the “level” they get at their hearing. Molesters can assert they are “non violent”, “sober”, ect, and get the “points” reduced or get the judge to “override” the scale. Currently the public notification system is failing. All offenders of all levels should be on the website. \n4- “Victim Shield Law”.  As you know one of the few protections we offer rape victims is “Rape shield laws”, in order to at least try and prevent a rape victim’s sexual history from being put on trial rather than the rapist. In child sexual abuse cases there are no “Rape shield laws” to prevent the victim, or the victim’s family (often the mother) from being made the center of negative attention. In the past defense lawyers for rapists would portray rape victims as promiscuous, today child molester’s lawyers portray victims and victim’s mothers as manipulative, litigious, unreliable, angry, mentally ill, sociopathic, medicated, or undedicated. Because we as a society love to blame women, especially mothers, molesters have been able to harness the misogyny in our culture in order to escape responsibility for their offences. Like the old rape cases that would revolve around the victims sexual past, today molester cases revolve around a child or a mother’s real or fictional problems instead of the focus of attention being the sexual abuse committed by the offender. I do not know if there can ever be a “victim shield law” to prevent the victim/victim’s mother being put on trial rather than the molester, but I know it would help victims avoid being re-traumatized in the system and help society hold sexual offenders accountable. One of the things to always remember with offenders is they are control seekers, and will take any opportunity to attack rather than just defend. They feel entitled to their behavior and see being held accountable as an injustice they are being forced to suffer, and they have zero guilt in harming any number of people (even their children) in order to escape the consequences they deserve.\n5-Plea deals down to “Endangering the welfare of a minor”. Despite the underlying behavior being the sexual abuse of children offenders are oft
21767
Probably not. News groups like Capitol Hill Blue and The Drudge Report report information that has not been confirmed by major news sources like the AP and UPI. This means that sometimes they break the story sooner but usually are dead wrong.
1152261
Yes. Fox News.\nYou can "google" the subject relatively easily.\nCheck out this artlcle on Lew Rockwell: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/douglas2.html
9818
Yes. \n\nFor an incredibly in-depth analysis of pictures, facts and commentary please see the source link.
852963
If  I wanted to read the real story of Bush I would definitely not want to read the one put out by him and his family.  I would want to read the real story.  It is just like the news today.  Do I want to hear what the Bush news machine puts out, or do I want to really know what is going on.  Especially in his case, although probably true for most Presidents, I would not trust much of anything he says after being witness to so many of his tragic lies, like WMD, Mission Accomplished, etc.  If someone were able to even publish the Bush story, starting with Preston funding the Nazis up to the present day, it would be a wild read.  Give me the unofficial one every time.
885498
Thank you for posting them. Very informative.  Bush must do more of this.\n\nDon't expect the mainstream media to do any positive reporting.
989189
Nope,sorry.\nPity about the news...
1086667
I don't think so.  That kind of stuff lately is all over E news!
367859
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/8612919/detail.html?rss=atl&psp=news
447145
this is related to the above answer. \n\nof corse it aint in the news know if it were it would have to be in the news EVERY day because wether people like it or not poverty happens every day. and "they" have done alot "they" help people every day its just some people chose not to help or egnor people that try to tell them about it. sorry but i had to say it cos its true.
110062
This would be my chance  to give the  world a serialised  story  of the  true state of affairs in Africa , issues   on governonce , cultures  and  the people .\n\nReasons  being that in most cases  i  have  watched with  great disbelief  the amount of untruth printed  and  televised  in the mainstream media giving  the outside  world  a  very  dark picture of  actually is the true  status in  Africa.\n\nIf  only  i could get such a  chance .
575228
Ok, so this is true, but somehow no legitimate media outlet ever broke the story.  It took some web site no one ever heard of to bring this to our attention.\n\nIt's amazing how ridiculous some people can be.
535200
yes they seem to only report part of the story the sensational part and leave out the part which really shows the impact on people. They also assist marketing which destroys the social values and morals and makes people doubt their worthiness.\n\nGood Luck and God Bless!!
391807
They use words like "The U.S. once again has...." because the U.S. once again HAS...... The media seems to be more to the left because most journalism is liberal. It has to be or it would be judging everybody. O.K. seriously, most mainstream news doesnt report good things because good news isnt interesing. Do you remember when Clinton was in office they were just as rough on him. That is the job of the media, to investigate and report. Maybe it seems they are reporting a lot of bad because there is. If you are looking for righty news try a.m. talk radio stations, its what my husband does.
842357
No.\nI can't believe people still believe in this stories.
647973
It is quite possible, and happens every day.  Two of the biggest hatemongering bigots are in the media every day....jackson and sharpton promote racism constantly.
432811
I'd like to know who the Liberal Media are today.  Is it someone like Judith Miller with a direct line to the White House? Or maybe it's the Fox News Channel on cable. Or Tucker Carlson and Chris Matthews on MSNBC.\n\nThe Liberal Media is a myth these days.  If it weren't for the New York Times, who have employed for many years persons of all political bent, including notable Conservative William Safire, and the above mentioned mouthpiece for the sitting President, we wouldn't ever know anything that the Executive Branch didn't want us to know.\n\nAdmittedly, much of the media we experience with national exposure are no longer impartial reporters of the news, and a survey of them would almost certainly favor the Conservative viewpoint. \n\nYou see where that's gotten us.  Most of what we have belatedly learned about the run up to the war has been from leaks from persons with a lot to lose, not from investigative reporting.\n\nAttila the Hun could own the different forms of media as far as I'm concerned, so long as the reporters and their managers were not constrained by the owner. \n\nHowever, that does not appear to be the case with owner Rupert Murdock, a foreigner, whose media holding seem only to present a Conservative viewpoint, with an occasional Liberal lamb decoy. I am very uneasy with this.