If women wear a pair of pants, a pair of glasses, and a pair of earrings, why don't they wear a pair of bras?
542594
for the same reason we park in a driveway and drive on a parkway. and why is it called a tv set when you only get one
205460
Well, it depends. Wearing a bra in American society is a lot more than just wearing underwear. For teenage girls, it is a sign of becoming a woman, and a lot of girls eagerly anticipate when they will be able to wear one (even if they don't need one). So, I guess the answer is two-fold. 1) For girls who develop early/at a normal time, they should wear a bra when a simple undershirt isn't enough for support/control. 2) For later developers, a training bra is appropriate if many of the girl's friends are already wearing bras. Also, a bra is probably appropriate when the girl starts taking gym classes in which she needs to dress out (change at school in the locker room) - less embarrassing to change in front of everyone if you're wearing a bra.
134564
I'm going to go with no.  Most DO wear underwear.  I'm sure there a good amount that don't, then there are the ones that are just being naughty.  But on the average most women do wear underwear.
52936
women in glasses always look sexy. Just my opinion though.
273816
male genitalia is something good to look at. admit it girls. so we might not need underwears anyway. as for ladies, their thing looks weird. it doesn't look good. only good to taste though.
324828
underwear and bra.\nas a fashion statement, of course.
379086
It does not say pants, but it does say that a woman should not wear anything that pertains to a man...and it also says that a woman should wear MODEST CLOTHING...\n\nDEUTERONOMY 22:5\n The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.\n \nI TIMOTHY 2:9\n In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;\n\n Ask yourself if women's pants make her "mince as she walks...\n\nISAIAH 3:16\n Moreover the LORD saith, Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes, walking and mincing as they go, and making a tinkling with their feet:\n\n Does that not describe the modern woman of today...proud look, eyes caked in make-up, shaking their hips, in heels and tight pants, and wearing jewelry on their ankles & feet?\n What makes them "wince" is the way they walk and the way their bodies are formed. A woman is built different than a man (Only sissified, homosexuals copy it).\n Watch a woman wearing pants, then compare to a woman wearing a modest, loose fitting dress or skirt. If you cannot see the difference then you are blind.\n Besides, women of a hundred years ago had a sense of morality that has since been lost...thanks to Hollywood and Women's Lib.\n Back then the only pants they wore was their 'bloomers', which was worn UNDER their dress. Then a petticoat was worn over that, then the dress was worn over that. So back then the pants was the under, under garment.\n If a woman dressed backed then, as they do today, she'd be locked away in a mental institute.\n Women of today have lost their sense of decency, morality, common sense and femininity.\n I do not believe as the Muslims, that a dress code should be forced upon women, because it must come from the heart. The Holy Ghost will tell them what is wrong and what is right.\n Remember also...Jesus said if a man look at a woman to lust after her, he committs adultery in his heart. So what about the woman that dresses in a manner that makes the men look & lust? Is she also not guilty? I say she is.\n The only women that dressed and acted in such a way, in the Bible days, was prostitutes, witches and worldly women...like Jezebel.\n We have their contemporaris today...in women like Jan Crouch and Tammy Faye Baker.\n Could you imagine Mary, the mother of Jesus, dressing like them?\n What a disgrace the church has become!\n\n God bless all that Love Him.\n\nTo know more, click here...\nhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/bibletruths_forbelievers/
106213
Chicks dig shoes. No reason, they just do. Probably a hormonal thing.
685356
A few reasons.  Some like it, and others think others (ie. boys) like it.  Mostly, women dress the way they do based on feedback from other women about what guys like.  This is fed into by a clothing industry that has decided that sex sells, which is why you have a hard time finding clothing for women that is somewhere between revealing and baggy.  This is part of the ongoing problem women have in finding clothes that show that they are, in fact, female, without showing EVERYTHING.  If more manufacturers made female clothing that was not revealing, yet feminine, then fewer women would be showing off their "goods" on a regular basis.  Manufacturers claim that women, themselves, want these kinds of clothes, and that is probably true, so until we as a culture return to encouraging modesty (what you DON'T see is sexier than what you DO see), women will make the decision to flash their cleavage (and usually more than just cleavage) and manufacturers will turn out a LOT of shirts that show it off.
674385
They are called breasts.
47879
If you could provide a satisfactory reason why you feel the need to wear them, most wouldn't mind.\n\nProblem is, there is no satisfactory reason - none at all.
248121
Yes they do. You can request to not have them put on if you would like. For my mother-in-laws funeral we told them that we did not bring a bra ( they told us to bring one) Because she never wore one in her life. You can request anything. Although who will look underneath her clothing to see if they put them on???
884747
you told it wrong, the question is "why don't women wear watches?"
375634
No...most women NEED jewelry, give us that and we'll let you spank us.  :)
509560
to wear under differenrt clothes, and multiple purposes, like there are dports bras, when you workout, there are baby feeding bras for women who breast feed.
1136025
To me it would be uncomfortable for both parties. I know when I am at home I like to be in nothing but my panties and bra, but if I had company coming, I would have the respect for them to put on some clothes. It would not hurt anything.
126947
Well, i had never thougth of it like that, but yes, it is.\n\nBut you have to be aware that those codes are changing everyday and this rules existed because in the past Men didn't use earings. \n\nBefore existed the code that woman were not allowed to use pants! remember!\n\nIt will eventually change and there will come the times when a man can use earings, long hair and even a purse! \n\nIn fact, i should ask! isn't all of it already allowed?