Am I the only person who believes that George Bush lied to the world about WMD?
547263
what is WMD? he's still r president cuz...i honestly dont no...but i dont think any1 can really trust what he says
222318
Its not an accepted fact.  If you notice 90% of the Democrats who were screaming about "No WMDs in Iraq" have all but shut up.\nIts because evidence has come out that Iraq did indeed have working WMDs and that those working WMDs were sent to Syria, as well as other places.\nNow the only ones who cannot accept the fact that Iraq had WMDs are the liberal sheep who haven't heard any different from their leaders.\nBut as I stated above they are not talking, they don't want to show their ignorance, and stupidity, and if someone doesn't talk about something for a while, eventually everyone forgets about it...\nThe problem is that the liberal sheep are still screaming that there were no WMDs, and keeping that fire burning, which will eventually force the democratic leaders to fess up and say, "Ok there were WMDs.  They have been shipped to Syria.  But Bush is still to blame for every social and moral wrong that you can think of."
190171
I've been spreading it around to as many people as possible. I believe 95% of it to be the truth. The only thing that I think they push the limits on is Marvin Bush's connection the WTC security. I dont think that has anything to do with it. But, having read the writings of Osama Bin Laden and having been very confused when the conflicting messages from him were given out, I find Loose Changes explanation much better than the governments. I remember when Bin Laden released a statement declaring his innocence, and I remember wondering what was up with that so called "confession tape". Having read his writings, he did not strike me as a flip-flopper or a liar. I dont agree with him, but he stands for what he believes in, and one of the things he makes a point of stressing is honesty.\n\nFor my part I believe George Bush and his administration are behind the 9-11 attacks.\n\n\nPeace
684816
It is simple, you are absolutely right. The problem is that the people who continue to harp on this "Bush lied" garbage are too busy hating Bush to shut up and realize what is actually going on in the world. Their minds are like steel traps; closed against all reason.
1117858
yeah go toot that horn somewhere else. Do you not know all the lies that Bush told to send our young men to war? What I say is why don't they stay out of peoples bedrooms and take care of the boardroom. Who gives a shit if Clinton got a little on the side and lied. do you know a man who has cheated who admitted it from the start? Not! Maybe if Bush would get a little on the side his mind wouldn't be so full of shit he might be able to speak in complete intelligible sentences. I would much rather have a lie about sex than a lie about lives.
1129575
Did he ignore them or not believe they were correct?\n\nMaybe that is why he then believed the reports of WMD in Iraq.
343440
Well since you are my favorite Genie in a Bottle... Of course the Mother of all lies is The Weapons of Mass Destruction.  Somehow that got America off course of finding the most EVIL MAN around that we want "DEAD OR ALIVE" (2nd worse lie, because GW forgot about bin Laden)So Somehow we found Saddam in a "spider hole" underground by himself in a space no bigger than my toilet? But we can't find BinLaden, even though he leaves tapes for us all over the place and is with an entourage of about 120 people?  Yeah, I'm thinking that might be biggest lie #2.  Or actually when W had the nerve to come to San Diego 2 years ago and have a banner behind him saying "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"  What your mission of having 1000 American soldiers killed? That plan went good for you? Now we're at what 3000 of OUR citizens and how many innocent Iraqis Murdered? Oh and I really like the lie when they told Pat Tilman's familiy that he was murdered by Iraqis, only to be forced to tell the truth that oh c r a p, it was our guys that killed him, oops sorry, not sorry enough to tell the truth but just sorry, and we're going to um.. oh yeah, LIE about it so we don't look so bad.
1169632
no- liberals don't admit being wrong they say we misunderstood what they were saying. from reading some of the liberal answers though,I would like to point out--\n1-Saddam's intentions are clear (he lied Bush didn't)\n2-mustard gas has a shelf life of ten years in enviorments with low concentrations of H20\n(Iraq) \n3-Sarin gas was also found its shelf life can be decades long-one drop on skin can kill -so how old the containers are doesn't mean anything other than its more dangerous to mess with.\nSo all the "Where are the WMD" people need to research a little more and don't leave it up to  journalist(how many times has the NY Times been busted on lies??)And the "we're there for gas folks" Wheres the gas??? I'm tired of paying$3 a gal. Getting the idea Bush didn't lie??
1093558
He got screwed over by Bush. The poor guy!! The man's a  true patriot. They made him look like a fool in front of the whole world. Powell testified to the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, that the sources who provided much of the information in his February 2003 UN presentation were "wrong" and that it was "unlikely" that any stockpiles of WMDs would be found. Powell said this was a "blot" on his record, "it will always be a part of my record. It was painful. It's painful now.
544233
I'm glad you narrowed your question a little bit.  Of course Bush Lies about practically everything.  Iraq.  Social Security.  His tax cuts.  His National Guard Service.  For the love of GOD the man cannot speak the truth about anything.
579211
You start with a falsehood that carries on throughout. But that's the leftist way, isn't it? Lie, lie, lie, and lie some more - because there are plenty of useful idiots who will believe you.\n\nThere were numerous reasons for the invasion of Iraq - their failure to have proven they destroyed their caches of WMD was just one of many reasons.\n\nSo, are you just gullibly stupid or are you a weasel manipulative lying sack of manure? Why would you lie to your son?
1145500
i heard about this\n\na couple of days ago it was weird like 3 or 4 post came in just like this one "why won't liberals believe the truth about WMD's" and the like.\n\nApparently on fox Sen. R. Santorum went on and made these funny yet completely wrong claims that they found WMD's.\nWhat gets funnier is that Fox made a big deal about it, like a exclusive or special report.\n\nUnfortnatley, it was all not only misleading but desprate and sad.\n\nFor example the person posting this claims "500 WMD's" \nWTF right?   But they are not Nuclear or atomic or but canasters of musturd gas aquired before  1991. These are what would be and are considered convential weapons, note by the way they weren't used because they didn't work.\n\nWhat is also sad is the way the person phrased his statement "recently declassified"\nTo the average bumkin or tourist he could get away with lying like that.  but  March 2005 is more than a year ago.\n\nThe weapons we not usable. Deulfer had reported on these and still concluded in his final report that there were no WMD's\n\n\nThe dishonesty of the poster is pathetic because clearly these cansiter are not the reason our brave men and women in uniform have died.\n\nSecondly the presdient wasn't referring to cansiters of convenital weapons when making his case.\n\nThird the white house would have gloted had they found legitimate WMD.\n\nFourth Colin Powell is on record saying the UN speech was a sham.\n\nFifth, other than fox news, no legitmate news source will say this. \n\nhttp://mediamatters.org/items/200606230008\n\n Most uniformed, and gulible people,  "continue to ignore conclusive assertions of intelligence officials that the degraded chemical munitions found were not, in fact, in the category of "weapons of mass destruction" that the U.S. was looking for at the time of the invasion. They also ignore the Iraq Survey Group's (ISG) September 2004 final report (also known as the Duelfer report), which noted that degraded chemical munitions had already been found in Iraq, and that they were not proof of an existing chemical weapons stockpile or of a renewed Iraqi chemical weapons program. Indeed, former ISG head Charles Duelfer stated that the munitions hyped by Santorum and Hoekstra do not qualify as weapons of mass destruction, though they may still pose a local threat.\n\n\nMaybe next time right..\n\nPS Democrats were decieved into voting for the war, the white house present information contested by the CIA as fact...\ngo here truth seekers..\nhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/
1064941
Well perhaps the majority of you do, but there is that group that will lead that man blindly over the cliff. Having a point of view is one thing. Enforcing it on another is something entirely different.\n\nAnd whether you believe it or not, what the administration says is looked upon as knowledgeable and is suppose to be well thought out. Some people, like Bush, Nixon, LBJ and others, have fractured that trust by lying.\n\nBush lied up until they actually found those secret camps! How can you believe anything he says. He is a pathological liar and it has dogged him his whole life!!
1009713
ROFL! Yup, you're right - you won't see a liberal on this question because they can't admit the truth that everyone in the world thought he had them ... mainly because Saddam used them on his own population, and bragged to everyone that he had them.\n\nAnd he did - we've found the "makings" and the "recipes". What else do you need??
145368
I beleive strongly that Bush lost the war,,he turned out to be lying to the world just to acheive his eveil goals and capture Iraq,...and takes its oil with nothing,,,\nAs for Bin Laden,,i am not sure..though i hope he dies before such a  thing happenes,,,although i dont approve all his practices ,,,I beleive he is defending nhis own rights...
701978
The reason is is that people believe anything that confirms what they want to hear.As recently as a few months back failed  senate incumbent from Pennsylvania Rick Santorum stated wmd's had been found, he later backtracked on this. Yet many of the most gullible ideologues started claiming "See, see their are weapons in Iraq."
1067875
That doesn't include two addled lies Bush uttered while trying to extricate himself from Yellowcakegate—that the CIA didn't doubt the uranium story until after he gave the speech, and that the United States went to war because Saddam wouldn't let inspectors into Iraq. Why was the yellowcake lie treated like a major news event, when the earlier lies were not?\n\n\n\n\nthat Saddam Hussein had "recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." This information was based almost entirely on documents that the CIA and the White House knew were false.\n\n\n*Saddam Hussein blocked the work of United Nations weapons inspectors in 2003.\n\n\n"The Iraqi dictator must not be permitted to threaten America and the world with horrible poisons and diseases and gases and atomic weapons."\n-- George Bush, Oct. 7, 2002, in a speech in Cincinnati.\n\nWe've learned that Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases ... Alliance with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving any fingerprints." -- President Bush, Oct. 7.\n\n\n"We have also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas. We are concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using these UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] for missions targeting the United States." -- President Bush, Oct. 7. \n\nWe have seen intelligence over many months that they have chemical and biological weapons, and that they have dispersed them and that they're weaponized and that, in one case at least, the command and control arrangements have been established." -- President Bush, Feb. 8, 2003, in a national radio address.\n\n8: "Our conservative estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agent. That is enough to fill 16,000 battlefield rockets." -- Secretary of State Colin Powell, Feb. 5 2003, in remarks to the UN Security Council. \n\nWe know where [Iraq's WMD] are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south, and north somewhat." -- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003, in statements to the press.\n\n"Yes, we found a biological laboratory in Iraq which the UN prohibited." -- President Bush in remarks in Poland, published internationally June 1, 2003.