do singapore follow United State of America non-profit organization law?
546794
I'm sure they do not because "non-profit" is, at its root, simply a federal tax status which would have no relation to Singapore's tax code.  All other laws and regulations related to organizations that have this tax status are state and local. (They vary greatly and deal with things such as state and local tax exemptions, audit requirements, donor solicitation rules, etc. which would also have little relation to Singapore).  As for what Singapore's laws and regulations are, I'm sorry I can't help you there.
1057729
well,if I'm nt wrong,he have e final say in approving laws after consideration with various constituencies.\n\nhe also has to be a ambassador for singapore.attending foreign conferences and such.
787284
The benefit, as you see, is property ownership rights, apparently.  Singapore is a safe, corruption free country.  You could do worse.
165232
http://news.monstersandcritics.com/asiapacific/article_1032799.php/Most_Singapore_teens_dont_know_what_ASEAN_stands_for
807487
i knew a company in Taiwan that sold some goods to a USA company for about 40k USD. the USA company did not pay. they traveled to north carolina and took that company to court in the USA. the judge threw the case out because he said the Taiwan company did not have a USA office and they had no rights in the USA. but that was that case. yours maybe different.
91403
first off, does the organization have a lease for the facilities?  If so you can check the lease to see if there is any violation of the terms of the lease.\n\nRegarding separation of church and state, I believe as long as the mission of the organization is nonsectarian, that is, providing assistance or service to those of all religions, then it is not violating church/state restriction. \n\nYou could be a bit more specific about the activities and mission of the organization for a better answer.
951388
Think in terms of your chapter you just read. What did it tell you about this issue?\n\n\nI would think that you could outsource to Singapore the following issues.\n\nHiring\nBenefits\nSafety\n\nThe reason is that you want people that are local that understand the Singapore laws relating to those areas. Each country has different rules and regulations on these areas.
931508
Ask the US embassy in Manila.
184912
A non-profit and not-for-profit organization are the same.
528254
I believe that is an official and national organization so check for an official website. there may be info there.
1089320
It would not be correct to see Singapore's memberships in ASEAN/UN as successes or failures. It has its limitations as to the roles Singapore can play because of its small city nation status, population, economy, military. As such the country's contribution can't be one of leading the region nor be prominent on the world stage. Nevertheless Singapore have been a positive and pro-active nation particularly in ASEAN throwing its weight behind humanitarian efforts in the Indian-Andaman tsunami relief and other mercy missions; tackling terrorist activity within the state; and promoting intra-regional trade and investments. Despite being surrounded with predominantly muslim neighbour countries, Singapore has achieved remarkable stability, peace and prosperity because its founding fathers laid down a very progressive system for the current generation of leaders to build on. Asean / UN has little to do with the "integrity", "vision" and "ingenuity" of the Singaporean people - these are the real successes of Singapore.
501112
Singapore helped in lots of financial and humanitarian aid to our neighbours. In Indonesia we gave lots of rice, sugar and other necessities to inaccessible regions. When there are natural disasters like the tsusnami and earthquake, we were there with our medical teams to help out. When East Timor was independent, we sent troops to keep the peace. We still have our troops (small token) in Iraq.\n\nBesides military-based help, Singapore also financed a lot of foreign students to come to Singapore to study in our universities and polytechnics.
506093
Yes, by current law in America, anyone not the child of a diplomatic representative is an American citizen upon birth in America.
267022
Your State's Federal offices should be able to point you in the right direction. You may also want to consult an attorney before doing this as a non-profit is extremely complex to implement and maintain
281605
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore \nhttp://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2798.htm#history\ntry these links.. good luck.
714153
Good question.\n\nMost often international law does not in fact conflict with domestic law. After all, treaties (which incorporate or codify much -- but far from all -- international law) are ratified and (in some countries, like Britain, that are "dualist" countries and where this is necessary) specifically made the object of an implementing law.\n\n(The USA is a "monist" country where only ratification by the Senate is necessary. But for political reasons most major treaties are today legislated into effect.)\n\nSome examples of non-legislated, non-treaty rules universally accepted: \n\n(1) whether a person is a national (citizen) of a country is solely a matter for that other country to say. (There have been very few exceptions to this, chiefly involving the Nuremberg laws taking away German citizenship from Jews in the 1930s; and a couple of cases involving decolonization.)\n\n(2) national territory includes the sky above a country, but not outer space. And the sea, out to a limit of X miles (where X has historically varied; and economic and fisheries zones have been created in recent decades). \n\n(3) no state should meddle in the internal affairs of another (here, of course, the problem is defining "internal").\n\nOften states do ignore, or repudiate, international law as accepted by most other states. And many states are hypocritical about international law. One good example is the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling on US invasion of Nicaragua. The USA walked out of the court, in an act that has forever shamed it. Another US embarrassment (and conflict) is between the ICJ ruling on the rights of arrested persons and prisoners to contact a consular officer of their country. The ICJ ordered a stay of execution where the US violated this rule (actually a treaty right) and the US Supreme Court permitted such executions to take place.\n\nSometimes international law is observed only by reason of political and diplomatic convenience -- or embarrassment: http://www.uniset.ca/other/news/wp_ronaldanderson.html (US military deserter seized in Canada and forced back to the USA by US immigration officers; later released by order of Secretary of State Kissinger)\n\nAs international law changes over time -- human rights law is a good example, and it's not understood the same way everywhere, Muslim countries being an example: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/links/islam.html -- there is often disagreement as to what it is. International law requires consensus, and comes from long usage and acceptance, from treaties, UN and ICJ decisions, and even from consistent findings of domestic courts in many countries, and from regional courts such as the European Court of Human Rights.\n\nBe that as it may, few countries want to be seen as violating international law, at least consistently violating it, or being anarchic. That's why there are "show trials" in dictatorships, and elections too where the incumbent typically wins 99.9% of the vote. And why such countries holler so loudly about the sanctity and inviolability of their sovereignty, and about alleged "meddling" in their internal affairs. \n\nOn the latter point, the right and duty of other countries to intervene where there is genocide in process, and other severe violations of human rights, is new. And as we see in Darfur and saw in Rwanda and Bosnia, selective.
1079234
Prostitution is ILLEGAL in Singapore. I think they don't really care if it happens in the common Red light districts("a necessary evil").\nPlease read the Women's charter.(http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/non_version/cgi-bin/cgi_getdata.pl?actno=1997-REVED-353&doctitle=WOMEN%92S%20CHARTER%0A&date=latest&method=part&segid=888375053-002442#888375053-002442)