What is the difference in double rank and single rank ecc memory?
549655
the single rank means that the memory card is full in one side of the card, double means it full in both sides of the card. there is even 4-Rank memory in development today.\n\nthe ECC Short for Error-Correcting Code. its the memory way to keep sending the correct data without losing precious time.
734126
The first one is faster than the second one.  533Mhz > 400Mhz.  I would trust crucial.com.  Although both will work for your system.\n\nAlso, buying from a major brand is always better than buying generic.  The memory will perform much better.\n\nAlso again, if I were you, I would look into getting a 512mb stick of RAM instead of the 256mb.  That would give you a grand total of 1024mb or 1gb of ram, which is what I would recommend to take full advantage of that system.\n\nGive this a try . . . http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820231038\n\nAnd to the answer above, yes SODIMM has a 200 pin version.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodimm
482756
Well, they both take a lot of time! And, I must see the algorithm of (....;)! When both take a lot of time, We should check the one which takes the less time! If both takes the same time, we should choose the one which takes less space (Memory space I mean) But generally, Prefer the 2nd one! I think we should try to use a general code or function in the second choice! If there isn't a general rule, then, I prefer using the 1st one, cause it takes less memory and the lines of codes will be less I suppose...
70116
It will make a slight difference:\nhttp://www.toshiba.com/taec/components/Generic/WP_memory.shtml
294090
http://www.tec.army.mil/Hypercube/
117518
you only need pairs if it is dual channel memory
424415
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRAM
584781
The Ring of polynoms over the Field lets say G2 (just for denoting) is the right algebraic model to use if we want to study CRCs. \n\nA sequence of bit like 10011101 is modeled by 1x7 + 0x6 + 0x5 + 1x4 + 1x3 + 1x2 + 0x1 + 1x0 which we can write shorter as x7 + x4 + x3 + x2 + 1.\n\nI hope I helped...
831001
Great question. Your memory is being managed by your Microsoft Windows XP or whatever you're currently using. By allowing other programs to take part in that memory, you'll be causing a bad conflict that will eventually cause the machine to start reporting false and inaccurate CRC information and free disk space. Windows offers you "Task Manager" which is, of course, the very best that's offered. Microsoft products for Microsoft Applications. Larry Radio Shack 01-9590
909878
dont use ur old stuff unless its ddr2 ... if its older than 6 months it isnt ... dont mix the types or you'll slow everything down , just add another 512 if you have a SINGLE stick, and check out the site the guy above mentioned to get the same speed memory ... if you have two sticks of mem now they are 256 each and most likely in dual channel configuration ... in that case i would get the same speed memory but buy (2) 512s' or (2)1gig sticks ... if you break up a pair of sticks in dual channel or add a third you will slow things down also ...
45573
ECC RAM is only made for use when a single error would be destructive.  It should not be used in desktop PCs.  It is significantly more expensive, and it takes time to do the checking which means that it will significantly slow down your memory access times.\n\nIn other words, you are paying more, for something that is slower, which provides a benefit which you as an average home user will never see.
756292
4-4-8 is I believe a faster timing for more performance. 3-3-8 I think is alittle more stable but its still fast. You must be talking about DDR2 memory.
1173094
guessing. Maybe a program ATI (video related) multimedia console (mmc) has caused an error in memory block 0x8002000B. \n\nNo results came up in a google search, so this is just a guess.
127597
I think there's a program called "MemTest" or "RamTest" or something along those lines.  Basically, look for some freeware that tests it - usually can be found on any of the "tech" sites.\n\nEdit: Yes, it is "MemTest" - I just "googled" it.  You may want to do the same.
948856
Current opinion floats around the 10 terabyte mark.  That's 10,000 gigabytes - 10-30,0000 times more than the amount of memory in your average desktop PC.  (Or a little bit more than you can fit in a ZX81's 16K RAM pack.)\n\nAnd a byte per neuron doesn't quite work.  A neuron by itself is useless - it requires a network of neurons to establish an associative memory.  So maybe 1 bit per neuron is closer to the mark, though that's still grossly oversimplifying it.\n\nWith respect Deep Blue's 11.38 gigaflops...  A gigaflop isn't a measure of memory capacity, rather a measure of how many billions of floating-point mathematical calculations can be achieved per second.  These days we tend to look at floating-point processing capacity in teraflops (trillions of operations per second).\n\nSuffice it to say, computers - even a ZX81 - are significantly faster at math than humans.
662885
No difference ,they are all used for dynamic allocation.only syntax difference i guess.
972567
Sounds like an all to common memory issue.\nTry Memtest86: http://www.memtest86.com/