Who would win in a fight, Matt Hughes or Bruce Lee?
538762
These people are out of their mind.  Lee was a movie star, but not a champion fighter.  Don't get me wrong.  He was a great fighter and lightning fast, but he didn't train in the way moder MMA fighters do to prepare for a ground fight.  He'd be taken down and either submitted or pounded into mat.
972376
The other guy(George St. Pierre) would Matt Hughes. You better know his name next time cause he's going to rule MMA for a long time.
514937
I am assuming that you are talking about being hit by both fighters while they were in their prime. In this case, I would rather get hit by Bruce Lee. I have seen some pretty nasty knockouts by Mike Tyson whereas I don't think anybody has seen Bruce knock out anyone unless there is some underground footage of real fights I haven't seen. There's no comparison really. One is a professional boxer and the other was an actor, although it has been said that Bruce was definitely a street fighter outside of the big screen. On a funny note, I wouldn't want to get hit by Tyson because if he couldn't knock me out, I would probably lose an ear.
619447
hughes will dominate..he has jeremy horn helping him..and horn is one of the best at utilizing his jui-jitsu..and there is a reason why matt hughes is the best welterweight ever..and plus..graice has never fought somebodylike hughes..i dont even think he has fought a full fleged mixed martial artist
201336
i really don't know a name of the greatest fighter of all time but i know that the chinese didn't even think Bruce Lee was that good.  Anyway Muay Thai is the most advanced form of fighting in the world so whoever is considered the greatest in that form of fighting would get my vote.
226444
Bruce Lee.\n\nActually Ali, since Bruce is dead.
1157053
Bruce Lee. Anyone who can kill Chuck Norris will win any fight.
878275
George St. Pierre dominated Matt Hughes in 2 round knockout to get the title. Silvia defended against Monson in a 5 round boring @$$ decision...
575277
Hughes Batters Gracie\nhttp://15rounds.com/boxing/News/2006/05/ufc-052706.php\n\n"Hughes scores a dominating victory over the legendary Gracie; official time of stoppage 4:39 of the first round."
670124
I think that Royce Gracie is going 2 win But it should be an AMAZING fight. Matt Hughes is a really great fighter but I think that Royce will win because it's all about pride, he would not only shame himself by losing but his whole family.
103848
Bruce Lee!! Was, still and always be the man!!
577317
Gracie...i believe he can tie up Hughes and get him in a submission.  If you have ever seen some of Gracies fights, he managed to prevent big time ground and pounders (Ken Shamrock) from hitting him.
241420
There is no competition there. Bruce Lee would demolish Steven seagal. We are talking about Bruce Lee...the guy who founded his own variety of martial arts compared to Steven?\nOn the upside I think that even Steven would be smart enough to walk away from that fight before it began.
553110
Ali because he's too big, too fast and too classy.  Bruce Lee may be able to kick him but at 6'3" and over 200 lbs if Mohammad Ali hit you, you will get hurt.  Ali would beat him to the punch, hurt him, then finish him off.
910228
I think Matt Hughes is going to win. Remember, he is in GSP's head, and combine that with the BJ Penn fight, Hughes has to realize that the competition is closing in on him. I think with his "farm-boy" working attitude, he is going to train even harder for this fight. He is highly motivated because of the fact that GSP dissed him after he beat Penn. Very exciting fight, but in the end, Hughes will have his arm raised in victory once again.
719838
To be perfectly honest I really wouldn't know how to call this fight. I think that they are both good fighters with more less similar physical strenght and power. I think Evan would have some advantage in striking and he'd probably do better standing up in this fight. Matt's wrestling skills on the other hand are some way ahead of Evan's (I think that he was an Olympic silver medalist in greco roman). But then again Tanner is probably a bit more experienced so I really don't know.\nIf I had to pick I'd go with Tanner but that's basically just taking a guess.\n\nAnd to answer the other part of your question I'm from Croatia and I do watch and like Pride more mostly  because of the great competitors and fights that they have in heavyweight and light heavyweight division, and because of Mirko of course. Middleweight division is about even in both organizations, with Rich Franklin and Dan Henderson being completely dominant. Welterweight division Pride doesn't have but their lightweight fighters and fights are better then UFC's in my opinion.\nBut to be honest what I mind the most are all these people who turn up here, know nothing about MMA of course, but still run their mouth about UFC like it's some kind of God given organization, Chuck and Andrei are the best in the world, Pride fighters are minor league and things like that. UFC in my opinion is most overrated MMA organization in the world and that's why I dislike it so much.
1158695
The thing about MMA is that one lucky punch or kick can knock anyone out. A well trained MMA fighter will win 90% of the time (if not more often) but can be caught with a lucky shot that will end the fight. Matt Hughes has the most weapons, offensively and defensively, in the UFC today to be considered the closest thing to an ultimate fighter.