what will happen if north korea made war with US?
536840
They will throw KIMCHEE at us and that's how they will win the war...
160171
Lookig at the present moment.I'am sure in my mind that North Korea will play a major role as an axis power in the far east.This will definately provoke the US,South Korea and Japan to mobalize.But we all know what the Japanese and Sotuh Koreans are going to do,their going need help from the US,which means the US is going to fight their war.\n\nThen in the Middle east,since Iran and North Korea have some ties,not the best but share the same intention to destroy the US,they might attack the US's main ally in the middle east.That will pull Isreal,Afghanistan and Pakistan to war.Pakistan being a lap dog of the US,will be forced to war(something good for India)\n\nBack again to the far east,China might get involved indirectly in matters of the North Koreans in orfer to persure its own motives,that is to take Tiwan.\n\nIn all of this,the European nation's will join to support the US,britain will deffinately fight in the far east.And other Euro nations might help the Isrealies.(French are a bit slow,Germans too)\n\nSo the mega war,will involve the European union,South Korea,North Korea,United States,Japan,Tiwan,China ,Iran,Syria,Afghanistan,Pakistan.\nIn the corse of war,India might find it difficult to take sides,so it might take up a postion of non allignment.(speaking as an Indian)\n\nRussia would be too bussy with chechnya.But if did have to commit its troops it would be in the east.As observers of the EU.They have histories with the present communist nations and iran therefore manking it diffult for them to commint fully.\nA final note:what ever happens the US is going to have its hands full,a result of poking around too much.
502324
We could, but we need to worry about Russia & China. Would Russia and China, both member of U.N. Security Concil, stand back and do nothing?  North Korea is like their little brother.
1057795
The "good news", if there is any, is that it's unlikely that North Korea (DPRK) has the resources to produce and maintain a stockpile of this class of weapon.\n\nThe bad news is that Bush's "war on terror" and his single minded determination to impose his personal vision on the middle east has, once again, taken our eye off the ball in North Korea. At the very same time, it's created unnecessary animosity towards the US in the rest of the world, including nations that could be helping contain North Korea.\n\nAll of that said, we in the west don't usually realize that grand statements of the Kim Jong-Il regime are usually directed at a domestic Korean (North & South) audience.\n\nFor DPRK citizens, Kim Jong-Il's pronouncements are designed to remind North Koreans how fortunate they are that Kim Jong-Il is working hard to defend them from imminent attack from the US. Remember that most North Koreans think the US started the Korean War.\n\nKim Jong-Il also seems to believe that these propaganda statements show South Koreans that the DPRK is very advanced and that they (South Korea) would be better off if they were under the care of the "Dear Leader" (Kim Jong-Il).\n\nJust my 2¢, but I'm not any more worried than I was last week (which is still plenty).
1160619
Iraq will need us for a long time still. When we are finished there, though, North Korea is in need of an overhaul in a big, big way. For insight on that, rent the documentary "State of Mind". If we don't go to North Korea first, I'm sure we'll go to Iran. YIKES!
783200
#4 sounds kinda dumb... you don't threaten a country with nukes, unless you want to go to war with them.\n#5 economically isolate them so there are no export/import to and from Cuba\nNote: North Korean CANNOT invade South Korea. An army with more men don't mean nothing. It's due to the fighting abilities/technological weapons. South Korean would own North Korea.\n#6 Have a United Nation concil meeting, explain the situation to the world, and other countries would help us gang bang Cuba and North Korea.
948724
No; we'd only get hit in return by China.  Instead, since China, Japan, Russia, and a couple of other nations have gotten involved in all this, I think it's best to let the powers in that part of the world have a turn at seeing if they can keep North Korea under control before we go storming in to do ANYTHING.
95861
It is a possibility but the consequence would probably be third world war. I hope that it never happens.
392288
North Korea probably represents one of the most significant nuclear threats facing the US. It is implacably hostile to the United States and unpredictable in its responses. For more than 60 years it has posed an invasion threat to South Korea, though the military balance has been increasingly tilting against its favor. North Korea now claims to have nuclear weapons, and Western analysts agree that it has had a capability to have produced them\n\nFor years North Korea’s overwhelming conventional superiority on the peninsula was partly countered by US nuclear capabilities. But as South Korean military capabilities grew, the balance shifted so significantly that by the early 1990's, the US had withdrawn all theater nuclear weapons from South Korea. \n\nThe core significance of N. Korean nuclear weapons is that they make a US use of nuclear weapons unattractive in any military confrontation. A N. Korean invasion would certainly require a strong US response. With so many US forces tied down in the Middle East, nuclear weapons might even be considered. The US might also be tempted to use nuclear weapons to preempt a N. Korean attack. Perhaps more disturbing is the N. Korean nuclear program. Not only has N. Korea withdrawn from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and claimed to have actually developed its own nuclear weapons, but it appears to have been a major player in a worldwide black market in nuclear materials, information, and potential delivery vehicles. It has also been very intransigent during on-going discussions regarding its nuclear programs, insisting on a right to have its own nuclear energy reactors\n\nUnlike Iran, No. Korea has had years of building underground structures at some 30 known locations as well as presumably additional unknown ones makes the targeting extremely difficult (esp. with regard to command and control centers).\n\nIt is also assumed that they now have the capability of reaching all targets within contental USA, something Iran doesn't have at the present time.
49789
No, I don't think we will. The 8th Army trains there, and besides, North Korea is a major trouble spot. War could break out at any minute, and the South Korean armed forces would have a difficult time dealing with the North Koreans, who have the world's fourth largest army. We have the third. \n\nHowever, i think the amount of troops will be reduced, and the troops have already been pulled back past the 38th parallel, because military strategy dictates that an attack would cost us much of the 8th army, and it would be 1950 all over again.
1173114
No, the US will not "attack" Korea, but your lame@ss bullshit comments only show you don't know sh*t from Shinola, sonny boy, so sit down, shut your f**king piehole and stuff your hands up your worthless @ss while I clue you in on the facts of life.\n\nWe, the US, will not attack NK, but if Kim Jong Il starts up a whole ruckus, then we'll by God lay a world of hurt on his fat butt.  And I'll tell you another thing, junior, old Kim is probably going to get the rudest surprise in his pathetic life when he finds out the Chinese aren't going to just sit on their hands while Kim does his best to get NK converted to a large cloud of radioactive dust to blow over on China. No sir. China will come down from the north while we drive up from the south, and we'll just do us a little piggie-in-the-middle with old Kim.  \n\nNow you are effing dismissed, maggot! God, shitheads like you really boil my piss!
138639
it's probable since both nations don't very much like each other and they do have a few skirmishes here and there but not enough to warrant a full scale war.  we should hope that these two nations keep the peace because they do have nuclear weapons pointed at each other.
24960
North Korea is a limited threat even with their nuclear capabilities.  They have limited funding and their people are starving.  They would not be able to sustain any military actions if they start one.\n\nThe bigger issue is Iran.  They have the resources, oil that can finance a lot more problems.  They have made threats to other countries and have the money to back it up.
1177559
None of them. US can't attack any of them. I know US have the best and newest type of weapon but N.Korea have nuke bomb and if Us attack them they will fire them and US with all of it's weapon can't stop them in the air. Also Iran is a very big country and it has a lot of loyal soldiers and it will be a long and hard war with many casualty for US. I know all of them so I'm sure US leaders know these so for certain US won't attack N.Korea or Iran. Iraq was different from Iran or N.Korea because Iraq's people were against Saddam and his dictates and also Iraq didn't defense against US but with all of this facts US have a lot of problems in Iraq so it's another reason. For attacking Iran or N.Korea US need other countries help because it doesn't have enough soldier and also US need other countries to reduce global pressure on US about beginning war in the world. Another reason: N.Korea and Iran if be attacked may do anything they can't and threat the world they may explode what they can. My evidence is Iran's leader's speech which was about this subject, he said we will ruin the world if we will be attacked by another country and he threated to stop producing and transporting oil in the world.
64288
If WWIII were to happen, my guess is that it would be in asia.  my bet would be china, pakistan, north korea, and maybe iran against india, US, south korea, japan, thailand, and maybe some european countries.  Also countries like nepal, afghanistan, iraq, which have civil wars or insurgencies going on would probably see an upsurge in violence as rebels in the country would probably recieve funding from opposed countries.\nChina is friendly with pakistan, and supports iran and north korea, while india is their main competitor in asia.  India has gotten the backing from the US so they can counter china.  India and pakistan of course are not friendly and have fought wars before, and india and china have also fought wars before and never really have great relations.  If a war like this was to break out and the US backed India, i'm sure china would let north korea go after south korea to divert US troops.  Thailand and Japan are both US allies and would not want to see China win something like this because it would really put their own interests at risk.  As for the european countries, i think it probably depends on the specifics of how the war started, great britain would definitely join with the US and india,  but the other countries likely would not if the US or India started the war.  Both Pakistan and China have been friendly with Iran, but who knows what is going to happen with iran now.  just my speculations on it.\nI don't know how it would start, maybe an india and pakistan conflict where india starts to gain the upper hand, then china intervenes so india will not become dominant, or a war between the US and iran which causes north korea to realize that this is their chance and they attack SK.  who knows?\ni'm not saying this will happen, but right now it is the most plausible scenario i can think of.
837532
Them and North Korea.
674059
The war in Korea. Today 50 years later Korea is still a country divided and the Communist North is the largest threat to nuclear war in the world today.\nThe war in Vietnam. Before the war only North Vietnam was Communist. Today 40 years later all of Vietnam is under Communist rule.\n(For those that say these were not wars but only police actions, tell that to the tens of thousands of troops that died there)\nAlthough you didn't ask the next war the USA will lose is the war in Iraq.