Do you agree with: Ray McGovern or Donald Rumsfeld?
541661
Not a shred of proof?  Where the h&ll have you been the last 3 years??!  Wathcing Fox News and nothing else??  \n\nNeither Bushie nor Rummy would know the truth if it bit them in the @ss.\n\nNo sense showing the Mona Lisa to a blind man, I guess...\n\nBTW, life-long Repubican here, until about 4 years ago...  No party affilliation now...
262580
i think its bill gates or osama bin laden. hes doing a good job of hiding against the mighty USA
747074
I think Rumsfeld took one for the team. He is a true patriot. Sometimes politics get in the way of being a human being, but he has stayed true to those that were around him. He might look like a lot of things to a lot of people, but he takes a lot of criticism because he knows in the end he is right. He is a good man. He reminds me a little of Reagan, old school.
610408
Defense is Donald Rumsfeld\nJustice is Alberto Gonzales\nLabor is Elaine Chao
97474
Bush, most definately!!!!!!! This answer has nothing to do with the fact the I like Bush or that I am a diehard republican but the fact that......Clinton is a pig!!!!!!!
1036081
Colin Powell or Condi Rice.
348757
got to go with hannity....but i like them all really.\n\nthank god for them. do you remember 20 years ago when the libs had a monopoly on the media???
698896
I think McCain and Powell compliment each other nicely. Their messages were very similar, while Powell served the State Dept., and they were both combat veterans. Very thoughtful, and sensitive men, with the will to make unpopular decisions, so long as they believe it's the right thing to do. This would be the Republican ticket I would vote for.
516176
David Palmer (Ex President from the TV show 24) or Jack Bauer (From the TV show 24)  I'd vote for either.  Anyone beats the recent clowns that have held office.  Even BOZO.
391468
I hope it's Edwards - McCain...\neither way it's about 8+ trillion times better that what we have now...\nBut I like Edwards... health care is a mess and us folks in middle America would like to be able to afford to go to the doctor if we need to...
61207
This is kind of a lopp sided question as it is always easier to complain about whatever we currently have.  However in this case the answer would be George W. Bush.  I have read some of the answers that you have gotten and some are based on complete misconceptions.  Yes our economy was better under the Clinton Administration, however that was due to the fact that the things that Reagan did for the economy were finally bearing fruit.  By the end of the Clinton years we were back into recession that plagued the early Bush Administration.  Clinton campaigned in 1992 promising National Health Insurance, however in his 8 years as President was not even able to get it to the floor of Congress.  Clinton had Congress's approval for the same reasons as Bush did in 1998 to go to war with Iraq, yet he never followed through with it.  If we blame Bush for making mistakes in his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress and the President made the same mistake in 1998.  What seems to be a common thing for both the American Public as well as our Politicians is a short attention span and a short memory.  In retrospect most Americans now think of Nixon as being a good President as well as a great statesman, yet in 1974 he was the most hated man in history moving Hitler to number 2 for the first time in over thirty years.
828142
It's between Lincoln and FDR because they led the country through its greatest crises and never backed down. A great president is measured through how he leads in tough times because tough times don't last, tough people do. Being a knowledgeable, strong commander in chief, and knowing how to manage spending by the government are also included. There are many debates about who is the greatest and most times your just choosing the lesser of two evils. These two are the obvious choices when you look at history. I would love to put JFK in here but the fact is he was taken from the people before he could fulfill his dream. You could argue the failures of Lincoln and Roosevelt as well but no one goes through this lifetime w/o failing. For the great ones, failure is why they succeed.
770535
Rummy should have been replaced at least two years ago.  I don't hate Rumsfeld.  I think he'd be a great grandfather, but he wasn't a good secretary of defense.
76894
Definitely Clinton.  During the Clinton years our economy was great (imagine operating with a budget surplus rather than deficit!) and he isn't a warmonger.
983248
Funny how the political hacks on the Republican side never mention the influential Republicans who have criticized this mess. There are a lot of Republicans who are furious at how Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush have run the war. Senator Chuck Hagel, a decorated vet and the much respected Senator Warner of Virginia come to mind. These guys know what they're talking about.
355112
Rumsfeld. Too much smoke for there to be no flames.
857394
Sorry, but Rumsfeld resigned Wednesday, after the elections. I seriously doubt his replacement, Robert Gates, is any better. After all, he was appointed by Bush too.\nFoley (FL) resigned from his post a couple weeks before elections. \nMakes you wonder, who's next. Cheney? Bush? \nMore to come in the next few months, if the Democrats have a backbone and push for invesigations.