Agree or disagree (see details)?
549876
Proof that our "friend" is a hypocrite and a mental case, see above.\n\nI ask myself every time I read the Bible, what does this mean FOR me.
266593
I do agree with you, sometimes I answer with a short answer first though, to get a good spot close to the first...and then, as a ideas develop I come back and add them...like I am doing right now.\n\nPLUS, that gives me a chance to check basic spelling and grammatical issues (which I believe you should out of courtesy to your reader...but then again, I'm a writer) - as well as buying some time to do a little fact checking.\n\nALSO, the people who submit one word answers end up not being able to vote for their own answers when a question is put to a vote, because in a sea of "yes" answers, how do you know which one is yours (if you didn't get the first spot).\n\nSo, YES, I do agree with you.  But the other side of it, and there is always another side of it, is; some people are just playing a points collection game with this, which is a sort of fun element, but entices the people with "video game" mentality to rack up points.  Its not wrong, but like you said, it CAN be pretty irritating.\n\n:)
1059743
i feel that, if they are really your friend... then they should be able to accept your perception of reality and at least listen to what you have to say. if they are your friend... what you say could, or should be important enough to listen to; not nessesarily agree with.  it's okay to: agree to disagree! you might just be right, but it's not your business to impose your feelings on someone, but if you care for someone, then it should be okay to at least warn them! if they take it the wrong way... you don't own that. you said your piece. if they get mad; apologize and step back. you've done the best you could do! peace-out, Saint Gillian.
125272
I would have put this under Words and Wordplay, but here is fine.\n\nAs for the question, it really is a question of situation. Contract the two that you don't want emphasis on.
724043
The short answer is No. I agree with the above people.
501360
are you asking or stating an opinion?
1031057
All right, I must admit you have made your point very clear!\nLikewise your wording is quite sound.\nPerhaps we must give it a second thought and \nElaborate the other way around as well\nReally do you want to get it right?
557731
I agree with The Professor (real or not) but regarding the last example he used (See below)\n>>>Thus, the rule requires you to say We can come to an agreement only if everyone is willing to compromise. But you can say more naturally, with slightly different emphasis and with no risk of misunderstanding, We can only come to an agreement if everyone is willing to compromise.<<<\nI tend to disagree.  These two arrangements do convey different meanings.  The first one means "No compromise, no agreement (i.e. a compromise is the requirement for an agreement)."  The second sentence means "An agreement is the only thing and nothing else we arrive at upon a compromise. (i.e. when a compromise is reached, we have no choice but agree)."
1047565
taking an opposing viewpoint in an argument, not necessarily because you believe it, but to help the other individual work out their arguments in favour of their position
43631
The first part  is (c) either true or false.\nThe second part is also (c)
679255
Errr...:\n\nAgreed.\nAgreed.\n... and Agreed!\n\n:-)\n\nWell said.
859760
The "agree to disagree" concept requires maturity and respect for others that is uncommon today.\n   People get too attached to their opinions and need to be "right" all the time.
221464
yes and no..lol.\n\nI'm to stubborn, i usually pick a side that i agree with but i can also understand both. I confuse me! Dang..
651221
Keep your individuality.\nSometimes people have to agree to disagree.\nMost people think they are always right. lol\nI think looking at things from all angles is called.....\nUSING WISDOM.
579875
Yes*\n\n*Conditions Apply
977625
Different people, different opinions. Take all advices but implement what you feel is right. Go ahead and believe only in positive entities.
810011
Argue away!  You are right - it should be wiln't or willn't.  Not really sure how you go about arguing your point with them, though, but I'm sure they have a web site and a contact link.  Good luck!