Who would you consider to be the anti-christ?
545192
As for his name, that is not known. I personally believe the Antichrist is alive and well in the Middle East.\n\nI am convinced from Daniel 9:27 and various prophetic passages in the Bible that the Antichrist is most likely going to come from Islam. He will be their expected "Mahdi" and he will have a phony shill calling himself Jesus to serve as the false prophet. The false Jesus will try to convince Christian that the Muslim Mahdi is the true anointed one and not Jesus.\n\nPre-Tribulation Rapture believing Christians (most, not all) will fall for this lie and will mark a huge departure from Jesus Christ.\n\nApproximately 3 to seven years after that point, Jesus will return and be mistaken for the Antichrist because of the Mahdi's lies. Jesus will destroy all who have accepted the Mahdi (Antichrist) and cast the Mahdi and his false Jesus into the lake of fire, meeting judgment before the rest of the world does.\n\nWhen the Muslim Mahdi makes his appearance - THAT - WILL - BE - The Antichrist. I've told you ahead of time - be on guard.
78106
satan is the antichrist. the prefix 'anti' means 'instead of' christ. he will appear in the skies with all his angels in a grand fashion creating the illusion of all that is heavenly with all its grandure proclaiming himself to be Jesus. he will be very convincing and will perform all same tasks as Jesus. he will also preside over God's 'elect'. they [the elect] in turn, will stand before the antichrist in an effort to discredit him thereby proclaiming their allegiance to God.
593818
Other than Jesus of course, I would say the very opposite type of person.  Adolph Hitler did lots of damage.
152781
The one who doesn't believe in Christ Jesus.
246490
"HEY," he can't be the Anti-Christ when George W. Bush is! You can't have our Anti-Christ, we are getting ready to impeach him and his staff; because the owe America and the World alot of money.
1183886
I think all this is ridiculous. How do you know that the anti-Christ wasn't born on June 6th of 1906, or 1806, or so on? If you believe in that crap, I feel sorry for you.
287762
Well, I do not declare myself to be affiliated with one party or another.  I don't vote for people just because they are from a certain party.  I vote based on who I think would do the best job, and whose morals I agree with, not based on their party affiliation.  So if an Anti-Christ from ANY party were to run for President (and I knew that person was an Anti-Christ), I probably would not vote for them... unless the alternative were much worse.\n\nI'd rather vote for an honest Anti-Christ, then a dishonest person who claimed to be a Christian.  It would really depend on their morals.
656406
The followers of islam say that Jesus is not the Son of God.  The Bible says that anyone who denies that Jesus is the Son of God in anti-Christ.  According to the bible, the anti-christ is satanic.
1023004
to know how not to be the anti Christ by that we would automatically know who the anit christ is.
451041
none. He would be w/ common ppl. just like He was in the bible. He views all ppl as equals, besides, He wouldnt want to portay himself as that type. \n\n\nbtw, he is alive...
1022762
According to the book of Revelations as interpreted by modern christendom, the anti-christ will be a world leader who appears on the scene after the gathering (rapture.) This leader will unite the people of the world against the believers of Jesus Christ in the war of Armegeddon. The popular belief is that we won't know who he is until he makes himself self evident.
186451
The idea of a single and thoroughly evil world leader near the end of time called "the Antichrist" is a popular, though unbiblical, belief. I have often stressed that the Bible speaks of "antichrists" or "an antichrist" but not "the Antichrist." After making this remark in a sermon, I was surprised to be approached by a brother who denied this claim. He showed me the New King James Version rendering of I John 2:18: "Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour."\n\nBoth the King James and American Standard Versions have "antichrist" in the first part of the verse. The New International Version drops the capital and reads "the antichrist," while the Contemporary English Version reads "the enemy of Christ." The Living New Testament also has "the Antichrist." The New English Bible has "Antichrist," while the New Revised Standard Version has "antichrist." The major Greek texts also differ. The Textus Receptus has the definite article (ho antichristos), while the United Bible Societies and Nestle Greek texts have simply antichristos.\n\nIn the English language we have the definite article the and the indefinite article a or an. But biblical Greek, like other modern languages such as Russian, has no indefinite article. And what is strange to those unfamiliar with Greek is that sometimes even when the definite article is used with a noun in Greek, it is not to be translated with the English definite article the. For instance, the Greek definite article (ho, he, to) is sometimes used before proper nouns: ton Petron ("the" Peter – Acts 2:37), ho Ioannes ("the" John – Matt. 3:4), ho Iesous ("the" Jesus – John 3:22). Yet we simply translate these "Peter," "John," and "Jesus." The Greek definite article is also sometimes used before abstract nouns, as in Titus 2:2: te pistei ("the" faith), te agape ("the" love), te hupomone ("the" patience). Yet we rightly translate these "faith," "love," and "patience" in this passage. Conversely, the English definite article is rightly used in translating Greek nouns which do not have the definite article: arche ("beginning," yet we rightly translate "the beginning" even though the definite article te is not used before arche in John 1:1).\n\nThese examples could be multiplied many times. The context, not the mere presence or absence of the definite article, is the most important factor in determining the meaning and translation of the noun in question and any of its modifiers such as the definite article.\n\nWith this very brief clarification in mind, consider the Greek text of passages in First and Second John concerning antichrist \nand the translation of these passages in the New King James Version: \n\n                                                                                         Greek                          NKJV\n                                               I John 2:18a             ho antichristos            "the Antichrist"\n                                               I John 2:18b             antichristoi                  "antichrists"\n                                               I John 2:18b             antichristoi                  "antichrists"\n                                               I John 2:22               ho antichristos            "antichrist"\n                                               I John 4:3                 tou antichristou           "the Antichrist"\n                                               II John 7                   ho antichristos            "an antichrist"\n\nObviously, the New King James Version translators
1124616
Depends on your and their definition of the term Christian? Everyone who calls themselves a Christian is not  Christ’s disciple. But from a Biblical perspective, I would think that  Messiah would have been more likely to support one of the many Israeli insurgent rag tag armies, like the one that finally rose up against the emperor in 70 ad and resulted in the destruction of Jerusalem and the loss of their country, than that of the occupying Roman Army. As an interesting aside, some  scholars believe that Barabbus, the man who was released  by Pilate, instead of Messiah by the vote of the people, was  a leader of  such a group of anti- Roman insurrectionist, and not just a common criminal.  That the Messiah supported  neither worldly army or supported any earthy kingdom and preached against violence, would cause you to think these facts alone would give the modern right wing, patriotic, Bush supporting,  Jingoistic American Christians a clue, but they remain clueless and will till the Anti-Christ deceives them fully.
197728
Probably more than anything, those who claim to be 'TRUE CHRISTIANS' couldn't be farther from the truth of the Christ which they claim to follow.  Look at the Christians in America today, they hate anyone who is different from them, ie gay people, minorities, etc.  They will claim to be doing God's work when they kill someone who committed abortion, or anything of that sort.  They are in short, the farthest thing from what they say 'Christ' taught them.  Christ according to the bible would have been a liberal, liberals care about people, they have mercy, they look out for each other.  Conservatives (what most so called Christians are) care only about big business, money and JUSTICE!\n\nThey fight against you because they need a battle to fight, they need to feel like they are doing God's work by bringing you down.  Oh how little they know!
805343
The antichrist is not one person, but is anyone who denies Christ Jesus. 1 John 2:18 confirms this:--" Little children, it is the last hour: and as ye heard that antichrist cometh, even now have there arisen many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last hour." These antichrists are in every country.\nAtheists, deists or agnostics, are antichrists. Any political or religious organization who prefers human rulership rather than God's heavenly government and it's rulership is an antichrist. Since the destiny of all who comprise the antichrist is destruction at Armageddon, it follows that all who would escape that end must separate themselves from any antichrist.
105781
Simple... they are ANTI-CHRIST!!!
1154255
To be an anti-christ, you have to believe that he was the christ. Since Jews dont believe that Jesus was the christ, the messiah, it CANT be a Jew.