All humans are entitled to certain "inalienable" rights...?
551981
Only US citizens protected under the US Constitution (since Liberals believe God has no role in government policy the world's population is not protected)....I thought but then again I'm an Independent\n\n\nAnd the Dems are in deep do do so they are tring to cater to as many voters as they can.
456548
So, why does there have to be "Women's Rights","Mens Rights" or any special consideration or privileges for anyone based on sex, religion or the color of one's skin?  Why not just make it all "Human Rights!"
181730
no they have less rights.  they are allowed to exist only by grant of the gov't.  They are required to follow rules that would be unconstitutional if applied to individuals.
952243
A clear distinction must be made between human rights and civil rights. \n\nHuman rights are inherent and inalienable, and are defined by universal documents (these rights, however, are often mainly given lip service, particularly by dictatorial regimes).\n\nCivil rights are those rights citizens of a nation have as a matter of constitutional guarantee. They cannot be violated by the authorities, and depending on the particular right, by other people. Civil rights can be abridged or even abrogated following conviction of a crime, however. \n\nNations beset with instability grant fewer civil rights to its citizens than stable, established democracies such as  in the US or UK.
127579
Animals have no rights.  However, we, as humans, have a responsibility not to mistreat them.\n\nWith rights comes responsiblities.  Non-human animals are not capable of doing that.
691105
Everyone was given free will. We all have the right. I don't belive it's healthy or productive, but we have the right!
606324
No.  That right is reserved for citizens and legal residents.\n\nThey do not have "civil rights."  They have "human rights."  This is an important distinction.  Also, to infer that the Constitution is bestowing rights on illegals is like assuming that illegals have the right to bear arms and vote.  "The people" in the Constitution very specifically means "the citizens" of the USA.\n\nWikipedia\nCivil Rights\nCivil rights are the protections and privileges of personal liberty given to all citizens by law. Civil rights are distinguished from "human rights" or "natural rights"—civil rights are rights that are bestowed by nations on those within their territorial boundaries, while natural or human rights are rights that many scholars claim ought to belong to all people.
450404
food for the poor?  maybe the poor should stop being lazy sons of bitches and stop taking my money.\n\nequal rights for all?  should be equal rights for peole who actually matter in society.
1058941
Of course, first amendment rights.\nI Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!
1122178
None in reality.!!\n\nWhy! Black Gold!!\n\n\n"We hold dear what our Declaration of Independence says, that all have got uninalienable rights, endowed by a Creator."\nSource: The New York Times, "Reporter's Notebook; Skipping Borders, Tripping Diction," David E. Sanger, May 28, 2002 \n\n\nI told you he never read it!
908335
I don't really understand the question.  As a citizen you have the rights of legal and political nature as guaranteed by the Constitution.
591851
Animals have rights while they are alive.\n\nRocks, once had rights.\n\nIn due time (billions of years probably), they may have rights again.
235037
The right to life, liberty and the persuit of happiness.
80977
They are people correct? Are we not all entitled to certian unalienable rights? The constitution protect everyones rights regardless of race creed or orentation.\n\nAs far as marrage goes why not,it is more of a sosciety issue not a right or legal issue, it is not really covered under the constitution.
994367
One could probably write a book on this topic, but briefly....rights may be human rights (those which we have simply by virtue of being human) and legal rights (those granted by courts of law, either in accordance with codes of conduct or at the behest of governing nations).  Practices which determine what is ethical (or not) based on what one is entitled to (rights) would be rights-based ethics.
698018
every one is human being
537589
Human rights refers to the concept of human beings as having universal rights, or status, regardless of legal jurisdiction or other localizing factors, such as ethnicity and nationality.