whos better the british sas or the american delta force?
552997
The British SAS was founded in WWII..As the Long Range Desert Group..Their (very real) feats and acts of great bravery are unparalelled...there is no comparrison
1020003
true im with u....And even th iraqis say that britshers are good soldiers whereas americans just run their vehicle over people gathered for meeting rape womens and kill teenage kids see the videos all are americans
727355
I'm biased as well. Army!\n\n19 Delta Calvary Scout\nVeteran, Granada (yeah, old school!)\n\nWith that said, Marines are better suited for special applications like amphibious missions. Army Airborne is best for parachute drops. I perfer Air Assault, myself, coming in fast from low flying helicopters, dropping fast, and securing the area!\n\nAll have their missions and all have pride in them.
57060
Wrong, blackvipe. The Sherman was american, the Panther was german, and the t-34 was russian.
637150
right on Annoying American, you nailed it. damned batf & delta force. remember waco, texas? yes, go back to the constitution, please.
296820
The US is by far, number one in almost every way. Number two is where the real debate is. You could argue China because of shear numbers if nothing else. Russia still has a formidible defense, although their technology is way behind. Britain could make a good arguement for being number two, especially since their navy is top notch. Israel probably has the second best air force (and in some ways their air force may be the most technologically advanced).
613834
what do you expenct with american, its americans the home of the gun everyone has one they just love to shoot did you not see that film where they play heavy rock music to get them in the mood for killing. just glad they have stopped killing british soliders and joralists lol. some of my best friends were killed by american bullets. i dont know why they want to kill british soldiers but if i was in charge of the british forces i would fire back. \nwe are doing them a faviour by being there more british soldiers have died from american bullets than iraqi can u believe that.
338487
USA No 1!!! U.S.A, U.S.A!!! Yeeeaaahh!! Whooo!!\n\nWhat's an "italy" or a "portugal"? I know what an "england" is, that's something you tie on a lead and drag into warzones so that you're not in it on your own.\n\nBrad Friedel Brian Mcride for president of UK and Brian Mcride for UK first lady!!!!
793075
between bofo and bravo.
720643
No it is not true. fight against terrorrism for british& USA is very easy but they play with terrorrism in order to get the permission to stay longer in middle east and allover the world.this fight is somthing like entertainment for them because it refresh the economy and social exercise
469937
joint ops or delta force games.
380670
I would say the best snipers goes to the British...UK....since their military is longer history compare to USA.
1046933
We have state of the art equipment, We have far better training, i teamed up with SAS guys before, don't get me wrong, they are good people, but there Units lack our equipment, and besides we have Indeginous Forces on our back to help us with navigation and situation, so yes i would say we kick the SAS's butt.
521125
well if you look at economic power its the UK and with the USA bound to stand with the UK militarily its the UK again so i suppose were more powerful than Germany
1141572
Ghana, hands down. They were suppose to be the whipping boys in the Group of Death featuring the Italians, Czechs, and Americans. However, when the dust settled, the Black Stars actually advanced to the Round of 16.\n\nKudos to them.
554444
The people of Britain were staggered when America refused to help. Even more so because the Americans were seen to be siding with the pretty sordid dictatorship of General Galtieri. America sent the message loud and clear - stuff you Britain, we prefer the dictators on our doorstep. \n\nBritain went to the Falklands not just to defend its territory, but to defend its citizens there, who were now the prisoners of the Argentine forces. This was an honourable cause. \n\nThe Brits proved themselves still capable of amazing military logistics in delivering its Forces so fast and so massively into the South Atlantic way beyond the normal operating range of British air and sea power. That they did this without the help of their fairweather 'friends' the Americans, made the feat still more extraordinary. They even turned the ocean liners Canberra and QEII into fighting ships in a matter of days! They got short range Vulcan bombers (veterans of the 1950's) out of mothballs, patched them up and somehow got them in the air all the way, to accurately obliterate the runway in Port Stanley, denying the Argentine Air Force a landing strip and seriously compromising its capability - vital because the AAF was the only really effective element of the Argentine Armed Forces. \n\nAll this was done while the Americans sidled up to the despotic General and the French sold the Argentines the Exocet missiles that did such deadly damage to the Royal Navy.\n\nThis war is remembered with pride in the UK. The British Armed Forces proved once again they're the best. They proved it in the fighting and they proved it in the way they overcame the sheer enormity of the task of delivering a huge military force across the largest expanse of open sea without any friendly harbour or airport along the way - thanks to the Yanks.\n\nThe answer to your question is Yes - the Americans did abandon their greatest ally at a time when Britain truly needed them. Worse, they abandoned the Brits in favour of a a pretty gruesome Dictatorship .... and the British people, who are strong on loyalty and friendship, have harbourred the grievance ever since. America should bear that in mind.
633737
I'd have to say the U.K., although Israel is a good ally too. Unfortunately, the Iraq war hasn't made us too popular.