Where was Jesus' ministry in the Synoptic gospels?
543177
In the book of Matthew, mark and luke.
1164326
According to Christianity, Jesus was sent to us to set humankind on a different path than they were to begin with.  Perhaps humanity was already ont eh path to destruction, and this was God's way of intervening, saying "hey. listen up..."\n\nJesus' teachings were in the form of parables, or metaphor. He deliberately taught that way to make people think and to come to the answer on their own.  They have the choice to think or not, to accept what they find or not. \n\nPerhaps God was lonely...  that is another theory.
509513
Synagog is a Jewish church
334184
After his resurrection, Jesus Christ gave flashes of light regarding an obligation resting on all his followers. Most likely it was to the 500 disciples assembled in Galilee that he said: “Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit, teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you. \n\nThereafter, all followers of Christ were to be preachers, and their preaching commission was not to be limited to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 10:6) Nor were they to perform John’s baptism in symbol of repentance for forgiveness of sins. Instead, they were to baptize people “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit.”\n\nJesus commanded his followers to baptize new disciples “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit.” (Matthew 28:19) What did Jesus mean? Baptism “in the name of the Father” indicates that the person being baptized wholeheartedly accepts Jehovah God as the Creator and the rightful Sovereign of the universe. (Psalm 36:9; 83:18) Being baptized ‘in the name of the Son’ means that the individual acknowledges Jesus Christ—and particularly His ransom sacrifice—as the only means of salvation provided by God. (Acts 4:12) Baptism ‘in the name of the holy spirit’ signifies that the baptismal candidate recognizes Jehovah’s holy spirit, or active force, as God’s instrument for carrying out His purposes.\n\nJesus commanded, it is to be carried out “in all the nations.”  To Jesus’ Jewish followers, that must have been a startling commission. He was telling his Jewish disciples that they would now have to go out to the “unclean” Gentiles of all the nations and teach them. It took some readjusting for them to absorb the impact of and act on that assignment. (Acts 10:9-35) But there was no getting around it; Jesus had told them in a parable that “the field is the world.” \n\nWhen we examine texts offered by Trinitarians as evidence that the Bible “implies” a Trinity, what do we find? An honest appraisal reveals that the scriptures offered do not speak of Christendom’s Trinity.   \nAn example of such texts is found at Matthew 28:19, 20. There the Father, the Son, and the holy spirit are mentioned together. Some claim that this implies a Trinity. But read the verses yourself. Is there anything in those texts that says that the three are one God equal in eternity, power, position, and wisdom? No, there is not. It is the same with other texts that mention the three together.
282461
There were lots of writings around, and none of them were called "gospels" at the time--they were just writings from different people.  The word "gospel" just meant "good news."  For example, if you look in your New Testament, you'll see that the Apostle Paul's writings are called "epistles" (another word for a letter or written message).\n\nThe first three gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) were written in the early days after the death of Jesus.  (The book of Luke and the book of Acts were originally one book.)  These three are called the "Synoptic Gospels" ("Seeing Together Gospels") because they have a lot in common, including some of the same source material--scholars  believe that the writers of all three of these gospels had read a document called the "Q Source" or"Sayings Source", which was a collection of things Jesus had said.\n\nThe fourth gospel, that of John, was written much later than the first three--no earlier than 90 C.E.--and is very different from them.  It contains a lot of visionary poetic imagery, and seems to reflect Gnostic teachings.\n\nA lot of other people wrote accounts of the life and teachings of Jesus.  If the Bible had included them all, it would fill a bookcase.  Many of these other accounts have been lost, though some (such as the Gospel of Thomas) have been rediscovered.\n\nIn the beginnings of Christianity, there was no unified organization;  there were just a lot of different individuals and congregations who had heard about Jesus from different people.  So there was no real agreement about what books were sacred and/or authoritative. \n\nOn several different occasions, Christian leaders organized councils to discuss these questions.  A key council was the Council of Nicea.  There were a lot of arguments and politics there, and some doctrines were adopted and other conflicting ideas were declared heresies.  The Nicene Creed originated there.\n\nThis is how both the official doctrines and the official canons (declarations of what books and writings were holy) were formed.  Some Christian groups never affiliated with the Catholic Church (for example some of the Ethiopian and Coptic groups, etc.)  Some of these groups had other ideas about which writings were important.\n\nMuch later, when Martin Luther established Protestantism, the Protestants threw out some of the Bible materials they did not believe was authentic.\n\nI suggest you do a web search on the phrases "Council of Nicea", "Nicene Creed", "Bishop Arrius", "Bishop Athanasius", "Emperor Constantine", and "Early Christian heresies" and do some reading.  The links suggested by some of the people who have already answered this question are good, too.\n\nI'm not listing any links because I am writing from memory;  I studied religion in college, back when dinosaurs ruled the earth.  ;-)
195434
Each Gospel was writen by a diferent person into a diferent reality, they are no chronological and don't tell the same things to people. Each one show a diferent angle of this person called Jesus to other people. They were writen also in diferent times (The gospel of John is the latest, writen about 100 years after Jesus' death). So, Mark and Luke, didn't considered important tell that part to the people they have writen for
1097291
Rev.17:1-6, 1014[This is the world that Satan is in From Eden, most especially after the flood. # 1 to # 5 had fallen when Jesus was crucified and ascended in Rome #6, John was on Patmos to write the book of Revelations in Rome #6, the world would get the Word of truth for the last days and it would have to be over 300 years old, KJV 1611 + 303 = 1914 and this Word is an excepted translation to the second coming of christ to end the 8th for Satan as he is cast out of heaven after #7, he has a short time in the 8th Rev.12:7-12]; Matt.24:3,7,14,15,22,36[Jesus tells us about the end of this world and only God knows the day and the hour];\nThe bible gives 6,130 yers after Eden and Satan faces Rev.20:1-6; The 1000 year reign of Jesus. Eph.3:21; the world of Jesus never ends.\n\nRev.18:1-6; Make sure not to be a part of Babylon.\n\nHeb.2:9,14,16; John 17:3; 1 John 2:22; With these scripture, one will be no part of any antichrist.\n\nMatt.22:37-40; The great commandment as Jesus gives. Rom.13:8-10; 14:9-12;\n\nAvoid 2 Tim.3:1-7; for next Gal.5:19-22[the fruits of the spirit]; Take up your cross and follow Jesus and Identify those that do not as Matt.10:34-38; They will let you know.\n\nYou may think you are in Babylon. That is a mass of confused persons.\n\nTHESE TWO WEMON ARE OF OLDEST PROPHECY Gen3:15;\n\nRev.17:1-6[Satan's woman Babylon]; Rev.21:1-5,9,10[The lamb has a Bride]; Gal.4:26[new Jerusalem is the mother of us all]; Rev.3:12[Heb.12:22-24[new Jerusalem];
632754
It shows that ALL gospels, including the ones found in the Christian's New Testament, were written as a result of their own theology, rather than historical events that they witnessed. Each author had an agenda, and so he wrote stories about Jesus that 'proved' his agenda. The author of the Gospel of Judas believed that Jesus gave permission to Judas to betray him, thus absolving Judas of any wrong, so he wrote a story to 'prove' it. The others gospels did the same thing.
1055045
If Jesus was talking about the future, he would have said the future. He was talking about His death. As He was lifted up, all of mankind was lifted up with Him.\n\nThe day of the cross was the end of the world. World in Hebrew is translated as 'age' or 'era'.  The old world of law and sin ended and new world of grace and peace began.\n\nThis is the gospel, this is the good news !! The end has occured. I wish more Christians would realize this. That there fear and following laws is of no avail. Jesus saved the world. Anything we think we can do to add to or change that is self righteous.\n\nThe law was taught so harshly to show people that they could not live up to it no matter how hard they tried.\n\nSpread the good word!!
562616
http://www.athanasius.com/camission/mission_main.htm\nThis gives a list of all of the missions in California.  I hope that it helps you with what you are seeking.
94503
Paul wrote the most of the letters  in the New Testiment.  I do not believe he had anything to do with any of the Gospels!
586031
The 3rd Century Judas gospel presents a different interpretation of the live of Jesus and how Judas follow his destiny. It is a work created to support other ideas. But who wrote it?\n\nNot Judas, he committed suicide after Jesus was risen from the death. Yes, Judas was there just before Jesus ascended. But Judas did not belief and he commitment suicide. (You can find that in the Gospels from the first century.) A very different picture that Judas Gospel presents.\n\nSo we have partial information the Judas Gospel that does not fit in the new testament. Why? It is a hundred years after the new testament was codified.\n\nWe have another document from the third century near where other documents (Gnostic) were found. Gnostic may be a different interpretation of the new testament, but do not follow main Christian thought. Gnostic means "by knowing".
991618
Yes, this was when Mary informed Jesus that they had run out of wine.  Your question is a bad translation.  It should read "What of Me to Thee?"  This is Jesus reminding his mother that once this started, it can't be undone.  The relationship between Jesus and Mary will change from Mother and Son to Redeemer and Redeemed.  They both knew that his ministry will end on Calvary.  And Mary has given another Fiat, Let it be done according to Thy will.
651673
The answer by Spider is not correct. Jesus was resurrected and we, his followers will be resurrected when he returns at the end of time.\nMaranatha!
557360
Three of the disciples Peter, James & John, were given a closer place than the other disciples (they went with him to the mount of transfiguration & the garden of Gethsemane).\n\nFrom the following passages we can eliminate Peter.\nJohn 21:7 "Then the disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, "It is the Lord!" As soon as Simon Peter heard him say, "It is the Lord," he wrapped his outer garment around him (for he had taken it off) and jumped into the water" \n\nJohn 21:20-21 "Peter turned and saw that the disciple whom Jesus loved was following them. (This was the one who had leaned back against Jesus at the supper and had said, Lord, who is going to betray you?) When Peter saw him, he asked, Lord, what about him?"\n\nThe incident he referred to is in John 13.\nJohn 13:21-26 "After he had said this, Jesus was troubled in spirit and testified, I tell you the truth, one of you is going to betray me. His disciples stared at one another, at a loss to know which of them he meant. One of them, the disciple whom Jesus loved, was reclining next to him. Simon Peter motioned to this disciple and said, Ask him which one he means. Leaning back against Jesus, he asked him, Lord, who is it? Jesus answered, It is the one to whom I will give this piece of bread when I have dipped it in the dish. Then, dipping the piece of bread, he gave it to Judas Iscariot, son of Simon." He uses the same expression so this doesn't help much.\n\nWhen He was dying, he asked this disciple to adopt His mother.\nJohn 19:25-27 Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Dear woman, here is your son," and to the disciple, "Here is your mother." From that time on, this disciple took her into his home.\n\nMost commentators agree that the disciple in question was John, and he used this phrase, as a polite way of referring to himself. This phrase is only used in the gospel by John.
343940
Paul did meet Jesus,on the road to Damascus,and was indeed a Disciple.Next time do a little more research.
1086899
Matt 8:1-4 with Mark 1:40-44 and Luke 5:12-14\n\nMatt 8:5-13 with Luke 7:1-10\n\nMatt 8:14-16 with Mark 1:29-34 and Luke 4:38-41\n\nMatt 8:23-27 with Mark 4:36-41 and Luke 8:22-25\n\nMatt 8:28-34 with Mark 5:1-17 and Luke 8:26-37\n\nMatt 9:2-8 with Mark 2:3-12 and Luke 5:18-26\n\nAnd so forth.  I could give you more if you'd like, but that's a good start.  I would highly recommend the following book if you want to read a good harmony of the four gospels:  http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/080105642X/sr=8-1/qid=1151672321/ref=sr_1_1/002-7382174-0458408?ie=UTF8\n\nHope that helps!\n\nPS-I was assuming you were wanting examples of parallel accounts of the miracles of Jesus in the synoptic gospels.  You can read what others wrote if you want to know what the synoptic gospels are and why they are similar.