The assignment or use of an alternative, substitute,or sub-COTR is prohibited by Treasury policy?
308204
sorry, i couldn't find anything on google about it.\nhttp://scotthortonshow.com/\nmoney, http://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\nbush & clinton http://www.philipdru.com/triplett_stream.html\nisrael http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/webb_stream.html\niran http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=131
884689
http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc557.html\n\nCheck out that link. Basically, it states that if you set it up as "made as part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments over your life or life expectancy, " you can avoid the 10% tax penalty.\n\nI would speak with your financial advisor/tax accountant to discuss ways to set it up this way.
200141
False.  The law provides that a partial liquidation distribution may be pro rata, but is not required to be.
450721
No. See attached link.
117040
i dont think that is legal though. Is it? Ha! it is not. Did you ever read the Agreemebt Made by the software... it clearly says that!!!!
770678
Try to substitute something in its place.
437986
Yes. There are several clauses state that this is a possibility. Refer http://www.irs.gov
532717
They don't force you to use their preferred lender, they just intice you to use them with all the incentives.\n\nYou can use any lender, but you may lose the added bonuses.\n\nI have fought this for years, but it is impossible to get around it.
685169
Acutually, YES there are... but they do not apply to the typical situation.\n\nThe most common restrictions on resale price are typically deed restrictions found in govt subsidized housing communitites.  Typically, these communities or lots are built with some kind of beneficial financing/tax advantages and in return certain deed restrictions can limit resale value.\n\nA common example would be developer subsidized housing for low, middle and govt workers.  Often teachers, fire fighters, city employees & other low/mid wage employees can't afford the housing in the communities they work.  \n\nDeed restrictive programs create incentives for developers to build non-luxury housing to fit the needs of those who do the day-to-day jobs in a community.  Typically, there are requirements for then purchasing the housing as well.\n\nAnother way that communities encourage development of deed restrictive housing is to give bonuses to developers.  This is usually like: we'll allow you to build A with a bonus of # units if 20% are for low/mid income housing.\n\nDepending on the restrictions, I've seen them last anywhere from 10 years to 99 years.
547993
There are certain programs that allow this, sadly I cannot refer you to one as I do not know of one currently.
487640
Awww, without a GST?\n\n(tgt alt)-(unit alt) = VI\n(VI/RNG)x1.0186 = angle SI\nabsolute value of angle SI x CSF = CAS\nangle SI + CAS = SI
937789
Yes you can. Go to options.
1069868
Yes I believe you can.  But it's not good business.  If you default on one you could loose both.
864817
Our firm requires it.  I guess they are allowed.  I don't mind the direct deposit, but it seems wrong to force it.
802032
I assume your refering to a surety bond(there is no reference to an 'obligation' bond) which is a low/no risk fixed income investment.
351061
http://www.k12tlc.org/standard/tx/ss08taks.htm
345335
it is against their rules, but they don't really detect violators (unless things have changed lately)... my hunch is that gross violators will be stopped, but the occasional, small-time "shill bidder" they don't worry about