Is there some sort of Yahoo rule that someone has to ask the Adam & Eve/bellybutton question?
545476
at least once daily, but to get full effect it should happen at each meal ya know.....or at least every 8 hours
176945
Similar thing happened to me because some people's sensibilities just wont stand for that kind of a question.  I'm as open minded as the next guy and would never report anything like that.  But when someone does, for whatever reason, I suppose Yahoo are obliged to do something about it.  If you haven't been banned or your account deleted then don't worry too much about it.
20474
Searching the Community Guidlines, I can find no specific prohibition of these topics.  There is a mention in the Usage catagory about prohibiting anything that angers or incites users.  Perhaps they feel those topics are just too polarizing to the public.\n\nIt's also possible (but probably unlikely) that the questioners themselves deleted the questions.  I've included a link to the Community Guidelines for you to review.
922966
Isn't there supposed to be a question buried in here somewhere?
1050842
Wow, great question but it sounds like Adult Content to me and I don't want any of those weasel Puritans flagging me again... Wish I could help, but Yahoo is going full bore with this censorship thing. And here I thought it was just the poor Chi-Coms that got censored by them...  Contact me and I'd be more than happy to discuss it away from prying Puritan eyes...
662360
good response!!! i keep racking them up myself. none of my questions violated community guidelines. some uptight anal mother fucker going around hitting report abuse on month old questions! Y!A doesn't care!
990197
Barring total global annihilation, there's always going to be some Yahoo that wants to know something.\n\nAnd while it is probable that every question, in time, will have an answer, there are times when Yahoos are just going to ignore you.\n\nWell done, Grasshopper.
831641
Hello evilushun... :)\n\nIt had to do with someone hitting the abuse button..some here just do not like others answers, so they freely hit the button.. :(\n\nI had made a statement concerning a completely different question on here, someone reported me for abuse..even though there were 3 others, with the same exact answer.. :(\n\nWhen I got the violation I had been reported saying it was not a question, nor an answer..\n\nI am so sorry that your answer was deleted.. :(\n\nIn Jesus Most Precious Name..\nWith Love..In Christ.. :)
104166
No, but it is frequently asked for. At the moment the only changes we users can make is to the Watched Questions section of the page. Keep watching, though!\n\nYou can track the discussion and progress on the forum - http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=AjVaVcxHKABgqv0w5PlnqXkazKIX/SIG=12855u6b8/**http%3a//messages.next.yahoo.com/next/forumview%3fbn=SEA-YahooAnswers\n\nAnnouncements of future changes often hit here first.
1051293
"No - Adam didn't. Neither did Eve."\n\nWhy? Because your belly-button (navel), or tummy-button as it's sometimes called, is a sign that you were once attached to your mother. You depended on that life-line - the umbilical cord - for your nourishment from her body as you developed inside her.\n\nBut our first parents, Adam and Eve, didn't develop that way. I believe that God would not have planted on them a false indication that they had developed in a mother's womb.\n\nWhen God created Adam and Eve in mature form, the day they were created they might have appeared to be, say, 30 years old. But God wouldn't want or need to create the appearance of a false history, any more than the mature trees created by God would have had growth rings initially. Those are things which would develop in their offspring as a result of processes later on.
950428
Two funny things about this...\n\n#1. In order for someone to click on the question they had to be interested in what it is about. So obviously they aren't sick of stupid questions like this because they clicked on it.\n\n#2. I clicked on it. haha. So what the heck does that say?? *smiles* In my deffense I'm bored. And I agree with you. The question I hate the most is, Am I pregnant? Sorry I cant see into the future. \n\nWell that was entertaining.. and have a great night! Best Wishes.
515007
thank you!  my thoughts exactly.  i think yahoo answers is becoming full of immature brats who like to post questions for their shock value or to ask dumb questions about sex (ie "if i swallow will it make me pregnant?") that they are too chicken sh*t to ask their parents.
654872
I don't know.  I've noticed the same problem with some of my questions.  Maybe it's like someone said--if your questions aren't about sex, or hating someone or being pregnant, then people aren't interested.  :o)
883957
This is an inappropriate question and should be removed by Yahoo.
87306
A cute question deserves a cute answer.\n\nYes, Adam had a belly button.   However, he wasn't created with it. It was where God pulled out the rib to make Eve. At least that's how my 5 year old daughter explained it to me.
1033809
I really suspect it depends on the question being asked.  If someone is asking a question about tuning up an engine, I suspect most people on Yahoo would perhaps respond with a quote from a Chilton's manuel or something similar.\n\nLikewise, in the religious section, if the person asks a question like "Did Noah...?" or "Did Moses....?" then it seems appropriate that a person providing an answer might quote from the Bible as a response.  On the other hand, if the question is "Did Vishnu...?" then a quote from the Bhagavad Gita is much more likely to be given in response.  And in both cases Atheists are likely to rudely butt in and say "It is all a myth!" (Actually most Atheists are only rude in regards to the Bible and seldom stick their noses into Wiccan, Hindu and Shaminism questions.)\n\nNevertheless, the the religious questions section most people are asking questions based on the Bible, so most answers to those questions are have some sort of reference to the Bible.  Deal with it.
439887
Answer to the question: someone's stuck on the subject.\n\nCaution, topher. Naming someone in Y!Answers can be considered a violation of Terms of Service and could draw an abuse email for chatting, harrassing, or some other category.\n\nI will say that I was able to look up the questions I think you are referring to. I read the headers only, but since all 27 have the word "Mormon" in them there appears to be an obsession.\n\nI don't know the content, not being that interested, but if you feel that there is something that violates community guidelines you can use the abuse process yourself. Just click on "abuse" in one of the questions.\n\nYou will have to choose a category of abuse and it will help if you put in the URLs or headers of all the questions and your reasons for believing they are abusive.\n\nIt's not automatic. A member of the Y!Answers staff will use your report to look the questions over and they may agree or disagree with your reasoning. There is currently a backlog of five days.\n\nHe may be looking for a reaction. That can be dialog or it can be trolling -- seeking to start a flame war. Don't bite. If you have a complaint make a report and move on. Avoid his bait. You're better than that and don't need to form an obsession yourself.\n\nA word to the wise.....