If one has no God why does one argue the point?
545069
Yup agree with u those people just know that deep down inside here must be something more! They jsut dont want to admit it so they end up fighting it
17209
Because without God, life has no meaning but to improve the world for those who will live in it afterward.  But the lives of those people have no reason to live but to further improve the world.  But why would the world exist if only for its betterment?  Well, that is the logical deduction, however, if you want my real answer you will have to ask me in private.
1001683
D and E. A bit of a contradiction, true. Cognito ergo sum. I think therefore I exist. Man thinks of God, therefore he exists. Which points to the fact that if the God is a product of man, then the supposed God of (A) does not exist. Therefore I motion that a god, or gods, do not exist at all. How can a god exist and de-exist, through the thought of man? Logic101. My weak point in college, but a great tool in regards to faith, religion, and gods.
209474
Means...\nIt's someone who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God. He/she doesn't say there IS no god. But that you can't prove it here. Faithless.
1066666
god exists, if you doubt it, then you are human, if you don't, you're still human, there is no reason to question your beliefs or faith, nor to question the beliefs or faith of others, in the end we all will die, reguardless of what we believe, then all of our questions will be answered, be a good person either way, if there is no afterlife at least you'll have had a good life
1112668
False.  It is not a reasonable argument.  Proof by contradiction.\n\nAssume that the universe is so complicated that it could only exist if God exists.\n\nThe universe exists.  Therefore, God exists.\nSo we would have proof that God exists.  \n\nReligion is founded on faith.  Without faith, there would be no Religion.\n\nProof that God exists, negates faith in God.  People wouldn't worship a God that is proved to exist.  People wouldn't found various religions.  People wouldn't go forth and spread the word of God.  All these things would be unnecessary, since God's existence would be a fact of life, like Gravity, Death, and Taxes.\n\nReligion would not exist.\nBut Religion does exist.  \n\nThis contradiction proves that our original assumption is false.\n\nTherefore, the universe is NOT so complicated that it could only exist if God exists.  Q.E.D.
539489
Maybe. And maybe not. The point of religion is that it is based on faith, not knowledge: so proving God exists would actually destroy all possibility of religion, because it would render faith impossible. You can only believe in something that may not exist. Believing in a God whose existence is rationally proved would be like believing in the postman, and THAT would be goofy nonsense.
818366
I don't believe I would try to prove God exists. \nSometimes, even with proof, people disbelieve what stands before them. Rather, it seems you may be asking for a reason to have faith. Faith comes without proof... otherwise, it's not faith.\n<warm hugs>
487069
For the same reason you appear to be so concerned with "what if there is no god at all?" To each his own. OF course, it would be nice if each were to keep his own to himself..but it ain't gonna happen.
652498
What truth do you have?  My money's on... just about nothing.\n\nAtheism doesn't answer a damn thing.  Whether you have a god or not, it is almost never in question whether or not God exists - you simply decide.  Therefore, not even the question of whether or not God exists is "answered" by atheism.  Guess you're stuck with a false-premised sense of security and well-being.  Maybe you should try actually asking a question.  Then you'll see how far "the universe possesses no god" goes in answering it. \n\nJesus Christ.  Read a little Aristotle or something.\n\nBet ya think I'm a fundamentalist christ pimp for saying your non-religion is empty.  There's that limp old atheism doing absolutely no work for ya.  I'm guessing you're one of those guys who would have been a DEVOUT Catholic when it meant beating someone's *ss for not being a Catholic.  \n\nNot mine.\n\nGood \nLuck
257471
There is no one god, no argument with that. Does it prove that every single other claim by any religious system is false? Not necessarily. All the flaws you pointed out refer only to the axiom of single omnipotent entity. How about the collective of entitites who created the universe together, without actually creating the man, at least not intentionally? Just a suggestion, no brainwashing intended here.\nSome people have taken the modern science as a god of its own, and refer to it just as religiously as Muslims to their\ngod. I suppose this god has to be more benign, but that is not the point. How was Stonehenge built? The Pyramids?\nWhat happened a single second before the big bang? To my mind, science doesn't give satisfactory answers to those questions because it is intent on the materialistic view, rejecting the interactions of several kinds of energies.\nScientific assumptions are not invalid, they are just, in my opinion, part of the greater whole, of the science that encompasses everything that has been discovered, and more.\nIn the same way, I can see a seed of wisdom in certain religions, without accepting them as the whole truth.\nTo me, any inflexible outlook on the world, being totally monetheistic, or totally scientific, is inaccurate. Binary thinking, black versus white, is a the kids thinking mode. Adults ought to realize the world is more complex than that. And yes, there can be a Democrate who is a Republican. I would probably vote for such, because he would share some of the Republican opinions that I welcome, and some of the Democratic ones, that I would approve of.\n(Our problem is that there is no such person currently, we always choose one extreme or the other). T.S. Elliot said it's a property of the brilliant mind to contain two contradictory notions at the same time. At the same time, this is my own addition, inability to do so, is the trait of the younger mind. Not a worse one, just a younger one.\nThe fundamentalistic view of the Muslims is based on their inability to operate with complex notions. It is all about\nus versus the enemy, even if "us" happen to abuse us. Good versus bad, "we" being the good of course. And so on. Brainwashing is easier accomplished when the mind decids it wants simple explanations to anything, and is too rigid to accept any other. In main stream religions, Muslims are guilty of it more than most, no matter what the politically correct approach says. But they are not the only ones. Communists, Atheists, Democrates and other monotheistic religions are just as guilty of it, and there are many other kinds of thinking categorically.\nThe point is, don't dismiss everything, just because one crucial point of their creed fails. Or else, you're being just as inflexible in your mode of thinking as they're in theirs. Would you reject all mysteries of the world just because God doesn't exist? Would you believe in science as blindy as they believe in their god? What is then the difference between you? Are scientists not real people? Don't they write their dissertations to prove what they intend to prove? How many of them can be completely, inhamanly, objective when one of their baby projects is challenged? Some of them have simply different techniques of brainwashing. If they decide the string theory is looking good, how many scientific publications would be allowed that claim differently?  How different are some of them from the preaching pastors? Just food for thought, no attempt to convert, I don't really have anything to convert you to. LOL.
569637
There is no reason to have a right and wrong definition without a God.\n\nEven the athiest cries out to God on his death bed.
960442
These are not rules, just statements. As statements I do agree. God is, I am not He.\n\nAs for other replies, it is written: "Only a fool says there is no God." There has been a lot of fulfillment to that statement.
1040282
a·the·ist     \nOne who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods.\n\nDo you not understand, what this means.
751458
"There is no God because I have never seen him" is the greatest unsound argument.
972296
Whether there is or isn't a god, the fact is you ARE allowed to search for the truth, and so those who object on religious grounds would not be speaking for whatever god may actually exist.\n\nWhich is precisely why some people prefer to be called agnostics, because their objections are to the religious depictions of a god, and the rules that supposedly come from that source, rather than to the existence of some supreme force or being per se.\n\nMost important, in my view, is to object to depictions of a creator god, as again this implies rules exist in nature that are inconsistent with science as we know it.  Mythology is one thing, but a belief that regards that mythology as true because one wants it to be true is not consistent with the type of search for the truth that you are advocating by this question.
982488
No, there is no god.\nThe only thing there is to believe in, is yourself.