Where do you suppose Saddam Hussein hid those famous weapons of mass destruction?
554024
i don't know where those are hidden...but i got my own weapon of mass destruction right here....
1127055
First of all, the entire world believed there were WMD in Iraq, based on Iraq's own documents and history of use, and much evidence and material has been found to support the existence of active chemical and biological weapons programs, even a few chemical warheads.  The fact is that the chemical and biological agents can be produced quickly from raw materials when needed and only stockpiles of the raw materials are required.  Of course, these raw materials usually have other legitimate uses and thus can be reasoned away.  \n\nFurther, the invasion of Iraq was in response to the numerous violations of UN secuity council resolutions dealing with WMD, several of which authorized the use of force.  Saddam was known to, and bragged about, helping international terrorism, and even though he probably didn't have any direct connection to 9/11, his connection to terrorism in general is well established.\n\nSo, get your facts straight and stop spewing this liberal, why-can't-we-all-just-get-along garbage.  There is evil in this world and it must be rooted out and destroyed at every opportunity.
679993
Small amounts have been found in Iraq, though not at the levels we believed.  Personally, I still believe that they could've been removed, but that's a debate for another day.  \n\nThe current Iran situation is that Iran is seeking nuclear power, however, most of, if not all of the world sees right through their current nuclear work as purely for the attainment of a nuclear weapon.  The president has even gone so far as to publicly state that he wishes to wipe Isreal off the map.  All we'd really like to do is to go in and see for ourselves how advanced they are, and they're denying that as well.
1105870
go ask Saddam he knows
1145229
That would be because Saddam had them when we invaded in 2003.  I was in the military from 1993 until 2004.  I can tell you this:  they lobbed an artillery shell at us with chemicals in it.  However, it needed centrifugal force to mix the chemicals and make them lethal.  The enemy mearly catipulted it at us so it didn't explode.  The liberal media refuses to tell the truth.  They seem to have an agenda to undermine Bush, conservative Americans, and our War on Terror.  I was in the war.  I remember CNN giving our positions away over the radio which was being monitored by enemy forces.
706253
FFS!! Here it is, yet again...\n\nWho lied??\n\n"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998. \n\n"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."  President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998. \n\n"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." \nMadeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998. \n\n"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."  -  Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 \n\n"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." \n    Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998. \n\n"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."  \nRep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998. \n\n"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."  \nMadeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999. \n\n"There is no doubt that... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." \n    Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001. \n\n"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." \n    Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002. \n\n"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." \n    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. \n\n"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." \n    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. \n\n"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and developing weapons of mass destruction." \n    Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002. \n\n"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." \n    Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002. \n\n"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."\n    Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002. \n\n"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop n
634268
Have we so soon forgotten, 9/11?  Weapons of mass destruction were found by the way just not in the quanities that everyone thought he had. Along with documentation proving that his regieme supposrted AL Quedia  terrorist operations
1181008
nothing. so there were no WMDs. there was still an evil dictator who wanted them and he had kill 250,000 + people
315303
It is under the door mat of Saddam's Presidential palace, you know the one that was housing the WMDs.  Much like everything else that has come from this administration, its nothing more than a pipe dream
14208
Yes, Iraq does have weapons of mass destruction. They are called hatred, lies and greed. Strangely, we seem to have similar weapons in this country as well. Should we invade our own country and have a regime change?
1037581
Your funny....i will laugh...........wait for it..........NOW......HAHAHAHA.\n\n\nThere is no point in name calling, i just want you to stop spreading lies told to you, I want you to research better of course...you deserve better.\n\n\n'WASHINGTON - In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion."\n\nhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/...\n\n\nWASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. inspectors have ended their search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in recent weeks, a U.S. intelligence official told CNN.\n\nhttp://www.cnn.com/2005/us/01/12/wmd.sea...\n\n\nUNITED NATIONS — A report from U.N. weapons inspectors to be released today says they now believe there were no weapons of mass destruction of any significance in Iraq after 1994, according to two U.N. diplomats who have seen the document\n\nhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/...\n\nNo weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq by the group looking for them, according to a Bush administration source who has spoken to the BBC. \n\nhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/polit...\n\n\nFour months after Charles A. Duelfer, who led the weapons hunt in 2004, submitted an interim report to Congress that contradicted nearly every prewar assertion about Iraq made by top Bush administration officials, a senior intelligence official said the findings will stand as the ISG's final conclusions and will be published this spring. \n\nhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/art...\n\n\nAND AS A JOKE>>>>>>>\nWASHINGTON — The chief U.S. arms inspector in Iraq has found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction (search) production by Saddam Hussein's (search) regime after 1991. \n\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,1346...\n\nLook i support goal of a stable democracy in Iraq, I sure as hell want the troops safe, but this adminstration lied, and sacrificed or troops for that lie. It is time for competent leadership.
961876
Most likely they are in the hands of Iraqi police or soldiers.  All we know is that the Iraqi record keeping was poor.  This does not necessarily mean that the weapons are in the hands of terrorists.
787025
We didn't give them to Saddam.  Somebody sold them to Saddam, so he could use them against whomever he wished.  Then they were blown up so he could buy more.  And of course we had to buy more all the time as well.  Somebody is making a "killing" in all this alright.  And they don't want to change this formula that has worked for so long down through the ages.  I think they call it "business as usual."  It is time we all woke up to this game you are calling attention to, and put an end to it.\nYou bet they will be armed, even if they ask us to leave!  An arms dealer never met a client he didn't like doing business with.  And they may well be used against us yet again in the not to far distant future.  It is a most disgusting practice.
1050293
the previous answerer is giving you the liberal spin.  Everyone believed Saddam had WMDs.  They believed it because he was no longer allowing UN inspectors into Iraq to make sure they were all gone.  His not allowing UN inspectors was a violation of the peace agreement that ended the fighting from Gulf War I, giving the US every right to resume military action.  Saddam definitly had WMDs (weapons of Mass Destruction) at a previous time because satalite intel picked up their use against Iran in the Iran Iraq war in the 1980s and against Kurds in the North of Iraq.  What he did with the WMDs is unknown.  Did he run out, did he ship them out before the invasion (we gave him plenty of time), did he bury them?  We don't know.  It is on record that Bill Clinton bombed Bagdad stating that Saddam had weapons or was developing weapons of mass destruction.  Saddam, himself, is an insane meglomaniac, and was a brutal leader.  His goal in life was to be seen as a great Arab leader and his choice of fame was to destroy Israel.  I would not say he had any chance of accomplishing that, but any attempt would have created a conflict that dwarves what is happening now.  Saddam was a time bomb that needed defusing, WMDs or no.\n\nIf you don't believe this guy was crazy, know that he starred in a TV piece instructing Iraqis on how to vacuum their carpets.
1160098
Saddam had them shipped through Syria to be buried in the Bekaa Valley in the hope that his regime would survive the invasion...\n\nhttp://www.freespeech.com/archives/002668.html\n\nhttp://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38581\n\nhttp://www.aina.org/news/2006012695410.htm\n\nUpdate: WMD's were found in Iraq this week:\n\nhttp://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060622/wl_afp/uscongressiraqweaponschemical_060622103838
506379
we thought there was weapons of mass destruction there.. now we find out there isn't any. So we have to clean up our mess and bring stability to Iraq for our mistakes. But more importantly, to protect the oil fields.
768084
Most of them actually don't know. In fact, most of them think that Saddam was hiding WMDs and that we actually found some. You can thank Sean Hannity and the rest of the dolts at Fox News for these perversions of reality.