What is the right way to spell, Judgement or Judgment?  Which is more commonly used?
535824
Judgment is the traditional spelling of the word.  However, now dictionary.com says that both are correct.  I would guess that 'judgment' is the more commonly used since that was the ONLY correct spelling until recently.
306852
The word "judge" in both scriptures have several meanings and its meaning is based on their context in the statement. Just as the Christian is suppose to "judge" another Christian's fruit and actions, yet not "judge" in condemning them to hell. Let's look at your two scriptures carefully.\n\nJohn 9:39 \nJudge = Greek: krima - a matter to be judicially decided, a lawsuit, a case in court\n\nContext: Dividing of two factions, believers and unbelievers (blind to sight and seeing to blindness)-Judgment based on fruit\n\nSo John 9:39 Jesus is actually saying, "For the dividing (judgment) between the believer and unbeliever I am come into this world, so that the believer would become a stronger believer, and that the unbeliever will become fixed and convinced in his unbelief."\n\nCompare the above with the same judgment in Matthew 25:32,\n"And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats."\n______________________________________________________________\n\nJohn 12:47\nJudge = Greek: krino - condemn\n\nContext: To condemn to hell.-Judgment of eternal destiny\n\nIn John 12:47 Jesus is actually saying, "Anyone who turns his back on the warnings I give, I will not condemn (judge) him to hell, he will have condemned himself via his own free will. For I have not come to send anyone to hell, but to provide a way out of it."\n\nCompare the above with John 3:17-19\n\n"For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God."
893045
Please use the spelling check!\nTomorrow.
373837
Complaint, Answer, Discovery, Motions, Trial, Judgment, Appeal
1003627
Ten til tomorrow, but to me, both have too many syllables. how bout 6 til midnight? or ten til never? Make sure you spell it right whatever you choose
30707
Actually, both of them are wrong. The correct grammarical way is "Tony and me." You always put yourself last, and then to find whether it's me or I, take away the Tony part. IT would be "He picked me up." Therefore "He picked Tony and me up," is the correct grammarical way to say/type it.
900107
We have the right to think whatever we want to think.  So therefore we have the right to pass judgement in our minds on anyone.  But I do NOT believe we have the right to outwardly judge any human being under any circumstances - I believe that is the sole right of our creator whoever or whatever that may be.  By speaking our judgement we use the power of our words and that action is wrong, in my opinion.  I am not going to say that I live up to that ideal 100% of the time but it's what I believe and I do try very hard to in my life.  Words are powerful and should be used with that in mind.
425082
Are you asking which term is grammatically proper? If so, both can be depending on the usage. But generally, we use the term head OR tail as we are usually referring to a choice of one side OR the other such as the simple gambling act of flipping a coin. But the way you have framed the question ("What are the two sides of a coin?") you are speaking of both sides at once so proper grammatical syntax would be head AND tail.\nConfused? Me too...
723431
english please, and check spelling
876120
LMAO How about "spouce" instead of spouse, or "devorce" instead of divorce... I could go on. I agree with you about the spell check, but it seems that people who really NEED to use it can never figure out how to do so - it goes beyond their mental capabilities or something.
582083
First of all, I'm French, so that should ensure that the answer is the right one: it's "danser pour vivre et vivre pour danser" . One of the previous answer almost had it right, except for the spelling of danser.
711411
Its everything ok but i would say Chamarra instead of chaqueta its more common than chaqueta.\n\n"Hay ciento noventa y siete chamarras. Cada una cuesta cincuenta y ocho dólares"
282160
From Dictionary.com when you look up "light".\n"Usage Note: Lighted and lit are equally acceptable as past tense and past participle of light. Both forms are also well established as adjectives: a lighted (or lit) candle."\n\nSo you can go for either one!  I like "lit" more... and I think that is the more common one.  If "lit" is more common, "lighted" might be phased out one day... pretty cool to think about.
814961
the last judgement refers to the rapture, when basically god ends the world, and judges everybody living, sending them to either hell or heaven.  meaning that when the trumpets of judgment are blowing, the world is ending and it's the end of everything.\n\nbasically, it's saying that if you think something, and you dont express it, it'll come back to you at the end, when it's too late to do anything about it.
367613
I agree. Too bad "much less spell, even with spell checking," isn't a complete sentence. The run-on sentence after that should be separated with a semi-colon. "English" should always be capitalized. There are a few other errors on your post as well. \n\nPerhaps, instead of teachers, the fault lays on adults who can not lead by example and type a correct sentence.
193092
youre allright?\nallright?\ncheers\nhello\n\ncheers is even used instead of thank you (not always but often)
187415
spell correctly, maybe use "check spelling"