Grammar: Do you capitalize 'is' in a title?
536254
Actually, you do.\n\n"Is", since it is a verb, requires capitalization.\n\nRule Number 8 at grammarbook.com:\n"Capitalize short verb forms such as Is, Are, and Be."
1163890
No, that would show possessive use.  The s after the name is just fine, and actually grammatically correct.
715293
yeah. the only thing i don't know is capitalize. that's mainly because i'm lazy also!!
89989
i am \nyou are\nwe are\nthey are\nhe is\nyou (plural) are
70318
If the subject that "is/are" is referencing is plural, than no!  Don't give up your "pet peeve."  Now, if you're correcting people on the street or at work for using it incorrectly, then maybe that isn't the place.  People can speak how they like to speak, as long as they don't need to impress someone at the time, but I don't think there's any reason why you shouldn't be upset when you see a mistake like that in respectable print.  There's no reason to lower standards of formal grammar rules unless respected editors are widely acepting something new.  In other words, there's a balance.  We aren't in France, and there is no language acadamy here, but subject/verb agreement is a basic fact of English usage that is not going away any time soon.  Keep using respectable grammar if that's what you like to do.  There are people out there who appreciate it.  ;)
513969
Capitalization doesn't matter
843451
Since it is THE king or THE queen (not just a king in general but King Henry or Queen Elizabeth) you should still capitalize King and/or Queen. Think about it -- if you write about President Bush, you would still say the President if you were still referring to him later on without spelling out the entire name. So, unless you are just referring to a king in general, yes - you would still capitalize it as long as you are still referring specifically to King Henry.\n\n\n"Certain very high ranking government officials' titles are capitalized even when not followed by a name or used in a direct address when a specific individual is being referred to."
1170552
Which is dumber, asking that question or not being able to spell dumber, use capitalization or grammar?
669867
It would be usual to say "equipment is".\n\nTheoretically we could say "equipments are" \nand the plural form is accepted in the Scrabble world.
189173
It should only be capitalized if it is a title.  So you would write, "We were late to our Criminal Justice class."  But, you would write, "We were late to our class in criminal justice."
327180
There's not really one right answer to this. Some style guides insist on capitalizing Internet (and Web, when it's used as a noun), but others prefer to keep them lowercased. Most dictionaries still seem to prefer the capitalized version, but that may not last for long.
900623
Yes, it's capitalized, because it's a proper noun.\n\nThe other isn't one word it's two words, thanks giving.
208000
making it plural by adding "s" or "es"
1181872
First, the word, "what" should be capitalized. Then it's "jobs... PAY," not "jobs...pays." And, finally, the correct word is "pay WELL," not "pay good."\n\nI doubt you'll find any that pay well. ;-)
1119916
Black would only be capitalized if it were the first word in a sentence....like this one :-)  Or if it is someone's name...usually Black is a surname. I don't know anyone who has it for a first name.
85024
Use correct grammar and pronunciation and we might even have a snowball's chance in hell of  figuring out what you are talking about.\n\nHow : Capital H.\nbiologists: plural, not singular.\nWhose: Not whos\n\nSentence has a pronoun as a subject. Totally indecipherable.  What is "it"?\n\nAs the sentence is presented the correct answer could well be "Because of the label".
538733
Don't capitalize the names of seasons when they are used generally (capitalize seasons when they are used with another noun and thus function as proper nouns):\n\n Eg\n\n"I will be studying punctuation next spring."\n\nor...\n\n"During the Spring semester, I will be studying punctuation."