What finacial package can Charles Clarke expect now that he has been sacked as Home Secretary ?
547888
Should just be basic backbench MP's salary and expenses, which I think is something like £50,000?
875173
I am praying he never makes prime minister for that exact reason. Look at the damage he is done to the average punter as chancellor, think of what he could therefore do as PM.\n\nThe bottom line is that we pay enough taxes and his focus has got to be on increasing efficiency and cutting costs, not increasing revenues yet again and crippling the hard-working, honest individual any further.
1117859
nothing now that a dick and a bush is in the house. that means americans just got screwed.
396164
'bouncebackability' in a speech by British Conservative leader David Cameron.
714609
Tony blair would just change the law to benefit himself.\nThen there would be a new act of parliament preventing anyone from complaining.\nAs far as i know,the thatcher govt left johm major and subsequently the labour govt the wealthiest britain since the industrial revolution with a world beating economic template,all he had to do was follow the rules,...........\nNow brown has given us a 30 billion deficit and an economy built upon the lending of homebuyers.\nits doomed to failure, the world economic boom has helped bail brown out for the labour period of govt.all the time tony spends spends spends luring in the voters..\nwell it looks like its time for history to repeat itself...labour bankrupts the country, the conservatives seize power and dig us out , just when the hard works done,, labour gets in again...when will the left ever learn?
881523
I missed the "Farepak Christmas fiasco."  But why should the MPs be assumed to be sympathetic to that extent?  If they donate a day's pay to this and a day's pay to that, before long they are effectively depriving their own families who, you may be sure, are already over-budgeted for that salary.
769952
None. They'll just give us Hargreaves!
504856
The reshuffle was instigated way before Prescott's and Clarke's miseries. It wouldn't have helped just to sack Prescott (which Blair didn't anyway) - Blair NEED to do something on education and the NHS, and he MUST do something on foreign affairs and Europe - hence the major reshuffle!
930961
no not paranoid its a fact of life in this country now liberal wankers running the country.human rights my ass.the only solution is government change.i don't mean Tories remember the 80,s UK Independence a joke. only one way  and although might seem extreme is to vote for the only party that will restore law and order put a stop to the immigration shambles.and make are streets safe again.which party am i talking about well work it out.its up to you live as we do with terrorists running free,people born in Britain trying to kill us.pensioners who fought in the war who cant even afford too pay there heating bills.the rights of criminals and peodos put first.if you want these things changed you have to use your vote wisely or alternatively vote for one of the main stream parties and watch as the life's of your children get an  even worse deal than we get now.
1040782
in the Uk we just let them go then give them welfare and opportunities to scam the system, then we sack our home Secretary a few politicians have affairs and we forget all about them
1053883
I doubt that this is what your looking for but just in case  ....\n\nApril 19, 2006:Plans for a £290 million redevelopment of Hove seafront by architect Frank Gehry are in disarray today after a Government report found gaping holes in the scheme's finances.
535502
off books..hmmm. if he went bankrupt...hmmmm. the sitch does not look good...but, if i were you i would call the State and complain to the State Department of Human rights.
529203
Revolution? Hmmmmm, wishful thinking.\nI wish I knew the answer to this one. I think that our (UK) society has to take a giant evolutionary leap and realise that actually, the royals are not all that great and that their vast wealth could be redistributed to make better schools, hospitals, public transport.\nIs it going to happen? That's another question....
332603
He was a promising chancellor - but now he's upsetting people. He doesn't listen. He doesn't read his email. He doesn't reply to email. He has chickened out of doing something about those bloody Chelsea tractors - going to our schools twice daily. He wastes millions on a daft tax credit system - so ill thought out. He forgets the people who voted Labour. The people will forget him when the General election comes. Wake up Gordon - before it's too late. Sack politicians - not doctors and nurses. For more click the link below.....
16313
Check out:\nhttp://www.royal.gov.uk/\nfor more details. She is our Head of State and in theory has the power to disolve our Government. In effect this would be highly unlikley to happen! The UK is a constitutional monarchy so the Royal duties are mainly cermonial.
662616
I have to agree that the investment is poor.  As an ex-pat Aussie living in the UK it is clear that the English don't show the same level of government support as we do.  I guess maybe it's because there is only so much money to go around, and the populace insist on maintaining an expensive health service, NHS dentists, and other traditional tax absorbers; and that in light of this someone running for office won't win votes by saying "I'm going to eliminate non-private dentistry and build a National Institute of Sport"
837642
MAKE A LAW FOR MY CONTNUATION OF PRIME MINISTER FOR FUTURE ALSO