who should be englands captain Steven Gerrard or John Terry?
537893
Gerrard undoubtedly.He is the most versatile and complete player and has led Liverpool to glory for years now.
1176115
I wish there was a way to accommodate both of them, but their roles are quite similar and they both can be effective...maybe if England play a 4-5-1 formation, and Carrick comes in as the holding midfielder. both gerrard and lampard can then have attacking roles.
625992
both are very exciting. Gerrard is a bit special.
1184804
John Terry (England), Karles Puyol (Spain), William Gallas (France)
369101
Gerrard or Terry, they're born leaders and it shows. Although Beckham has actually done pretty well as captain he gets picked half the time for just being Beckham no matter how badly he plays!\n\nWhoever said Owen? What are you on about?!! A striker doesn't make a great captain anyway, let alone a quiet timid one like Owen!
1077607
I couldn't agree more Terry was awesome! It was a great save. I also think Crouch played well, he put that header in that got us going. Go England!!! :)
502135
For sure it is JOHN TERRY.He is defender,goal scorer,leader.All in all he is the best player of CHELSEA.
325277
I think they would fit nicely in the England midfield.Steven Gerrard is more defensive and a good ball winner.If you observe him playing in the league,he's damn good with long passes and crosses.As for Frank Lampard,he is more on the attcking.He's vision is good and he got an eye for goals.I think both of them will make the England squad stronger
460326
Any of these only? OK.\nPetr Cech (Czech republic)\nJonh Terry (England), Asier Del Horno (Spain), Karles Puyol (Spain), William Gallas (France)\nFrank Lampard (England), Steven Gerrard (England), Ronaldinho (Brazil), Arjen Robben (Netherlands)\nAndrei Shevchenko (Ukraine), Ronaldo (Brazil)
623314
Easy, one of my all-time favourite players, the mercurial Franco Baresi. \n\nA great captain for club and country. Pity he missed out on the World Cup. I know he felt bad about his penalty miss in the Final.\n\nIf you think Terry or Nesta is good. Just imagine someone better. He moved with the ball like a swan in the lake. So graceful, never panicking even with the world's most feared strikers breathing down his neck.
140603
I would go with Henry.\nTeryy Henry has all the skills needed, he is a good shooter, passer, crosser and dribbiler, he also has leader spirit, he is also playing in the hardest league in the world and is always doing good, so i would go with Terry Henry, he has been good for a very long time, Ronaldinho got the skills but he doesnt have the strong personality to lead a team like Henry does, he also dribbles the ball too much when he can pass it and get more chances, plus Henry is stronger and is mor fit and is in great physical condition and has lots of endurance, Ronaldinho isn't physically good, he would probably die if he goes to the English Premier League
389335
yes..joe cole, lampard, gerrard, beckham, defoe, crouch, john terry, owen...need i say more?? and also gerrard and lamps have never played together in a major tournament, we dont know how great those two are going to be together...
894022
Steven Gerrard from Liverpool.
348904
Steven Gerrard and Peter Crouch
1057140
John Terry of England\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if England is the team which lets in the least amount of goals till the semi-finals (after that it is anybody's guess)
1091051
After his performances in the Champion's League and FA Cup Finals, I'd pick Gerrard because he has heart and the ability to turn the game around.
634760
Most agree their is no English striker who can replace Wayne Rooney. In this case, why not bring in Carrick, who has had an excellent season, as a holding midfielder. This would allow both Gerrard and Lampard to undertake attacking roles (supporting Owen) in which they have played this season. They have both scored more than Rooney this season for clubs, but tend to underperform for England due to defensive duties, which would be filled by Carrick.