i need some datas about Tsunami waves equation, maybe links or texts or,,,,?
545200
check this link . if you want more log on to google.com. \n\nhttp://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/tsunami/Peru01.html
484617
HERE YOU GO:\nhttp://www.rkdn.org/titanic%20lyrics.htm
303175
go to this site:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_wave
510692
Try: allaboutphysics.com I think that might help.
524873
..Hi ...You can find the information in the link;)\nKind regards...
2193
Mariana Trench http://www.marianatrench.com\n\nMore information can be obtained from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariana_Trench
195240
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Modern_Physics:Waves_in_one_Dimension:Problems
142274
I like this one  \nhttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/neic/
3434
A tsunami (pronounced soo-nah-mee or tsoo-nah-mee [ IPA /suˈnɑːmi/ or /tsuˈnɑːmi/]) is a series of waves generated when water in a lake or the sea is rapidly displaced on a massive scale. Earthquakes, landslides, volcanic eruptions and large meteorite impacts all have the potential to generate a tsunami. The effects of a tsunami can range from unnoticeable to devastating.\n\nThe term tsunami comes from the Japanese language meaning harbour ("tsu", 津) and wave ("nami", 波 or 浪). Although in Japanese tsunami is used for both the singular and plural, in English tsunamis is well-established as the plural. The term was created by fishermen who returned to port to find the area surrounding the harbour devastated, although they had not been aware of any wave in the open water. A tsunami is not a sub-surface event in the deep ocean; it simply has a much smaller amplitude (wave heights) offshore, and a very long wavelength (often hundreds of kilometres long), which is why they generally pass unnoticed at sea, forming only a passing "hump" in the ocean.\n\nTsunamis have been historically referred to as tidal waves because as they approach land they take on the characteristics of a violent onrushing tide rather than the sort of cresting waves that are formed by wind action upon the ocean (with which people are more familiar). However, since they are not actually related to tides the term is considered misleading and its usage is discouraged by oceanographers.\n\nFor more information on a tsunami, visit:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsunami
1038870
Here is a list: \n\nhttp://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/naturalhazards/majorearthquakes/earthquakes_stats_new.html
933800
I think you try this website :\nhttp://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=17787 \nhttp://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=121941 \nhttp://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=21239 \nhttp://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=273392&page=5 \nhttp://seismo.berkeley.edu/~rallen/eps20/extracredit/InTheNews.php \nhttp://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html
905461
G'day bb,\n\nThank you for your question.\n\nThere are tsunami warning systems in place consisting of sensors to detect a tsunami and communications to warn those in harms way. A warning system has been in place since 1967 in the Pacific.\n\nUnfortunately, a similar system wasn't put in place in the Indian Ocean until after the Boxing Day tsunami in 2004 with moves now being made to set up such a system. No system can help if the earthquake causing the tsunami occurs just offshore as in the Hokkaido tsunami of 1993 when the tsunami hit no more than five minutes after the earthquake\n\nI have attached sources for your reference.\n\nRegards
427934
see the flowing\n\nhttp://www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/seismic-waves.html
463678
Good Luck on your project :P\n\nA Tsunami (Japanese for 'harbour wave') is a wave generated by an undersea earthquake,landslip or volcanic eruption so if you want to demonstrate what causes a tsunami rarher than it effect that it may have then we have to think about simulating an undersea earthquake.\n\nI think that the easiest way is to construct a wave tank,as you considered.A good size would be about 70cm long x 40cm wide x 10cm deep.\n\nNext make a flap from perspex or wood about 5cm long x 40cm wide (a little smaller than the width of the tank) x a few mm thick ,with a hinge fastened along the 40cm side.Fasten the hinge to the base of the tank at one end with the hinge furthest away from the end wall.Now connect a piece of thick wire to the flap so that the wire projects out of the water.Pulling the wire sharply should rotate the flap about its hinge.\n\nNow with about a 5cm depth of water,when you pull the wire this should simulate a sea-floor disturbance which is what happens in a tsunami.\n\nIf you make the floor of the tank slope upwards so that,at the far end away from the hinge, the water level is only about 2cm you may be able to simulate the increase in wave height which occurs in real tsunami as the wave approaches the coastal shallows. Why not experiment with different size flaps and different water depths?
1099809
The tsunami question makes me think hard...I've thought about this many times before. \n\nA nuclear explosion starts as a radiative shock which degenerates into a supercritical shock, and so on, until all that remains is a volume of gas surrounded by an expanding train of sound waves.  In water, the question would come down to the equilibrium volume of water vapor produced at the depth of the explosion.  That would primarily depend on the water pressure at that depth and the total yield, I think.\n\nI simply don't have the expertise to calculate that figure, but I suspect the total displacement would be relatively small, even for the largest weapons ever fielded.\n\nI suspect little of the energy released would ultimately be partitioned into work (mechanical lifting)...thus any tsunami would probably be small and of a relatively short wavelength.\n\nVery interesting problem to consider.
1120243
The type of wave you are refering to is not a tsunami. These types of waves are more often called "freak waves" or "rogue waves" in oceanographic literature. Tsunamis are only evident in shallow water and even when passing over seamounts are not generally noticeable to a passing ship. \n\nRogue or freak waves are rare, and since we have been positioning oil rigs offshore we have been able to observe and measure more of them that we previously had reports about.  The "New Year Wave" was reported by an oil platform in the North Sea off of Norway and measured at 25.6 meters in height. This was considerably more than the platform designers anticipated. I don't have exact statistics but I have heard anecdotal stories of waves of this height passing oil rigs during Hurricane Katrina last year in the Gulf of Mexico. The problem with measuring these waves during a hurricane is that the oil rigs are normally evacuated in advance and instrumentation often fails to survive the wave.  A number of oil rigs were lost during the hurricane. \n\nHere is a good website discussing current research on rogue waves:\nhttp://www.math.uio.no/~karstent/waves/index_en.html\n\nThe BBC did an interesting documentary on Freak Waves that makes them sound very alarming as a hazard to ships and gives some examples of close calls by passenger liners:\nhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2002/freakwave.shtml
408399
Best damn site period.  I use it all the time.\n\n\nhttp://www.advancedphysics.org/