Why didn't´t Jesus the son of God write a book explaining his teaching?
543720
He did not. It's so sad. I wish he had then we would not have to listen to this "You will go to hell unbeliever" talk. Jesus Christ taught about love not about reminding people that they are going to hell if they don't convert to "Christianity". I like what Mahatma Gandhi said "I like your Christ but I do not like your christians. You christians are so unlike your christ."
657760
Its really very simple- in the Five Books of Moses- given by God, to Moses on Mount Sinai- there is a statement that the law given then is eternal- and that no matter how many miracles a prophet performs, he cannot change even a letter of the law.  So any wanna be messiahs/prophets have to work within that law.  jesus didn't- and din't fulfill any of the requirements, according to Jewish law, to be the messiah- and was thus rejected.  Mohammed at first tried to preach to the Jews- but he, too tried to vary the laws- and was thus rightly rejected by the Jews.  Hey- when the real messiah comes, we will have peace and all this will be a moot point!
124237
Niether Jesus nor Paul (Saul) teach the Trinity.  On the contrary, they both taught the Gospel of the Kingdom as the central message -- that those who obey God may become sons of God, as Jesus is.  The Bible is consistant throughout, both Old and New Testaments teach of God's plan to create man in his image and likeness, as Jesus is the very image of God's character (Colossians 1:15).\n\nTrinitarian teachings did not come from the Bible; they did not develope until centuries after the Bible was completed.
593604
Bible doesn't specify what the carpenter built, was it furniture or boats? Why mention it? Same thing, Jesus was human and it was normal to be married, so why write about something that is obvious? Even the gnostics, who wrote that he loved her, didn't mention any details at all. If the writer's intention was to only make Mary look like Jesus' wife, then she (gnostic writers were mainly females) would have added details. They didn't because it is irrlevent, it's the "love" that is important and that's all. However note that the gnostics married spiritually, the marriage ceremony was sexual intercourse. Note also the wedding mentioned in the Christian bible... it was "on the third day" (significance?), the groom always provided the wine (Jesus turned water into wine there [this is symbolical, not a miracle]). Then, who is "the disciple whom Jesus loved"? Why does the writer not simply say who it is? If bible is "word of God" then the reader has a right to know. Why the mystery? The reason is because the gnostics were all about "hidden knowledge", that is how they wrote. Gospel of John is the most "gnostic" of the synoptics. No time left, but yes there is more than enough evidence to support that the Magdalene was Jesus' consort.
946701
Outside of the Bible. Jesus can not be proven
513882
You don't have pictures of Jesus the Son of God, because when He returns, the Christians will ascend into Heaven. That is what the Bible says, not that he is going to have pictures made with people here first.
456542
EASY...\nBecause the Bible was written by men...\nPaul claimed he had a dream - maybe he did - but it was his and the other three's writings after all, and they wrote it in different places at different times and that's why the Bible is full of contradictions. \nPeople do their best to interpret the Bible and make it sound related but how come while 4 men wrote it!\nAlso, if you will notice, the New Testament doesn't contain any laws or rules, it's just the teachings about how Jesus was great so that's why the Christians didn't have a choice but to add the Old Testament to it, and now they want to focus on the New Testament.\nFor example, if you will tell a Christian that the Bible is full of violence he will tell you "No! It's just the Old Testament"... got what I mean?\n\nSo the bottom line... it's a book written by men who forgot most of what Jesus had said cause they started writing it about 10 years after the crucifiction, and now the new Priests are trying to make anything out of it as much as the old Priests tried. Some of them were violent, some of them were nice, many of them molested children... etc.\n\nDon't expect them to ever agree.
980110
Because the Christian god makes absolutely no logical sense, that's why.\n\nNeither does Jesus, but that's a story for another day.
1628
Christ's teachings came directly from him (Gospels)aswell as other people like Paul (Whom Jesus spoke to after he went to take his place at the right hand side of God. \n\nSo I would have to say no. But you also have to treat things not written in the Bible with a lot of sceptisism.
944209
Could it be because God never wrote any of it?\n\nRead the course in miracles. A real revelation, not a counterfeit one like the bible.\n\nLove and blessings Don
908735
The word itself couldnt have been used, because the language itself didnt even exist until after Jesus.\n\nGo, learn history...
82837
Jesus did not come to talk of Himself!!!--He came to announce the existence of GOD THE FATHER AND HIS KINGDOM AND HOW YOU CAN BE A PART OF IT!!! Jesus plainly stated He would be Head of this Royal Family--but that YOU could also be a son or daughter with GOD!Any other "gospel" is a false gospel that centers on the Messenger(Christ) and NOT on what He preached!!!-I hope you have your answer-good for you for trying to understand the truth!
602586
Interesting point:  The only things that the Bible points out about Jesus that are important to us are the very same things that Muslims don't believe or accept.\n\n1.  Jesus is the Son of God\n\n2.  Jesus died on the cross and was resurrected on the third day.\n\n  These 2 facts bring hope to all men and women and this is why the writings of the disciples became known as Gospels (which means good news).  Everything else the Bible mentions about Jesus is mainly for our knowledge and stems from these 2 facts.  \n\n  The Bible was written by tons of writers which is why it is called the Bible (it means little books).  The neat thing about the Bible is that it was put together book by book and the authors did not even know eachother but it seems like it can be read as one book because of its continuity.  Some of the authors were separated by more than a thousand years!  So, because of this it is clearly seen that the true author of the Bible is one, not many (i.e. God).  No other book compares to the Bible, none.\n\nNo man or prophet or angel is comparable to Jesus.  People usually ask, "Was Jesus God or Man?"  And the usual answer is, "both."  I like to answer that question by saying Jesus was and is God.  How many men do you know or have you heard of that have done the things Jesus has done such as, make MANY blind people see, walk on water, raise people from the dead, raised from the dead, heal MANY people from ALL manner of disease, feed thousands of people with a barely any food, and cause the weather to obey him immediately (just to name a few)?--which after he had done this, his followers said, "What manner of man is this that even the winds and seas obey him"? \n\n  I think the biggest confusion comes when people try to understand what or who God is, which is why some don't believe in the Son of God.  In God there is the Father and the Son.  According to the Bible, denying the Son of God is the biggest sign of the devil, satan, antichrist, etc.  It doesn't necessarily mean that everyone who does not currently acknowledge Jesus as the Son of God is going to hell.  But, wherever there is the denial of Jesus as the Son of God, that is a sign that the works of the antichrist/evil are present.  \n \n Some people are not able to believe Jesus is the Son of God because of the way they were brought up.  Unfortunately for them they are enslaved in their minds which is the worst type of enslavement.  But the good news is, where sin abounds, Grace more abounds.  There is more than enough Grace to save even the most lost, but not for those who INTENTIONALLY help people become lost.  If all people of every culture and religion knew the complete loving truth about Jesus, they would LOVE to consider him the Son of God.  There is so much more to understand about Him....
632754
It shows that ALL gospels, including the ones found in the Christian's New Testament, were written as a result of their own theology, rather than historical events that they witnessed. Each author had an agenda, and so he wrote stories about Jesus that 'proved' his agenda. The author of the Gospel of Judas believed that Jesus gave permission to Judas to betray him, thus absolving Judas of any wrong, so he wrote a story to 'prove' it. The others gospels did the same thing.
453816
Yes.  God is not a book, nor is He confined to a book.\n\nThink about this:\n\nIn the time of Isaiah the prophet, the "Bible" as we know it had not been written fully.  But the Torah did exist, that is, the Books of the Law of Moses.  God spoke to Isaiah things which were not contradictory to the Torah, but yet were not in there either exactly.  \n\nAlso, most of history, most people have actually been illiterate.  And yet, God communicates with all of us, if we listen.
274549
It is a good question actually. The reason God does not clarify things to end the confusion is because God doesn't do anything. It really is that simple. And Master Jesus made this perfectly clear but the Christians didn't listen because they were running around with "itchy ears" and "another gospel". It is safe to say that for all practical purposes there is no active god, and there never was.
430272
Well, easy.. because Jesus is not God neither the son of God... he's a prophet like the rest of them and a human like the rest of us.. he used to eat, drink, get hurt, laugh and suffer.\nThe word "son" in hebrew is also translated as "servant" which could be seen as Servant of God, or Slave of God. Also, the Bible has been changed many times to fit certain situations, so maybe at a certain point it seemed suitable to make Jesus become the "son" or a "god"! Or maybe some Rabbis in ancient times translated it this way in order to put Christians astray... you'll never know why it became like this!\n\nActually, you're asking if he's God or His son why did he die? Worse, how could Satan seduce him in the desert? How could Satan seduce his creator? Also, it is weird to think that God needs to become human in order to understand us!! It's funny!