Could god create a video game console so expensive that he himself could not buy it?
547547
Yes, its called the PS3
905608
Yes God could have blinked everything instantly in existance.  He simply chose to do it the way He did for reasons I am sure my little brain can't understand.
308178
I would have to argue with you that Micky Mouse was the real god. I don't believe that a true god would proclaim to the world that he was the omniscient, omnipotent creater of the universe, and thus be guilty of the deadly sin of pride. I have never herd Micky Mouse proclaim that he is god therefore, because he is so humble, he must be the true god.
318907
It is possible. He talks certainly for some other world as He means His Father's world -i guess- which could be His base somewhere in Space. He is in same time God and Human and finaly he dies for the salvation of the Human been which is a creation of his Father which is the absolute God. Yes, this could be read like the Father is the Alien who creates the human -for a reason that only this Alien-Father knows- and as he sees His creation becomming a piece of shit He send His Son -from his planet- to save the perverted creation giving an horrible end in His life on earth. Then -after death- He goes back to his planet lettting people think about His sacrifice... It could be like this, i dont know, i wasnt there... i think only God and Jesus knows the truth....
1030866
You do not have an understanding of the basic belief in a monotheistic G-d.  If something is infinite then it has no needs.  If there are no needs there is no use for slaves or servants.
158827
This question should be banned.  I see it all to often, but here is my answer anyway.  I hope it helps.\n\nGod and Omnipotence\nThe paradox of the stone, as presented by Wade Savage:\n1. Either God can create a stone that God cannot lift, or God cannot create a stone that God cannot lift – there are no other possibilities. \n2. If God can create a stone that God cannot lift, then there is at least one thing that God cannot do (i.e., lift that stone). \n3. If God cannot create a stone that God cannot lift, then there is at least one thing that God cannot do (i.e., create that stone). \n4. From the combination of 1, 2 and 3, it follows that there is at least one thing that God cannot do. \n5. If God is omnipotent, then God can do anything. \n6. Therefore, God is not omnipotent. \n\nWhat this argument apparently shows is that omnipotence is impossible (or, that the notion of omnipotence is incoherent). Thus, God cannot be omnipotent (as nothing can be).\n\nSuggested solutions to the paradox St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274):\nAquinas defines as “absolutely impossible” any thing where the “predicate is altogether incompatible with the subject” (his example: “man is an ***” (in the non-metaphorical sense)). With this in mind:\nWhatever implies contradiction does not come within the scope of divine omnipotence, because it cannot have the aspect of possibility. Hence it is more appropriate to say that such things cannot be done, than that God cannot do them.\n\nThat is, to be omnipotent involves being able to do all things that are possible. For example, it is not considered a limit to my powers that I cannot draw a square circle. That’s impossible, so it’s no failing that I can’t do it – it cannot be done.\n\nBUT: surely I can make a thing that is too heavy for me to lift, so that task is not impossible, so if God can’t do it, that really is a limit to his power.\n\nGeorge Mavrodes (1926-):\nMavrodes responds that although “a stone too heavy for Simon Cushing to lift” is not a contradictory notion, “a stone too heavy for an omnipotent being to lift” is a contradictory notion.\nMavrodes’s argument in full:\n1. Either God is omnipotent or he is not. \n2. If God is not omnipotent, then the fact that he cannot do something (either make or lift the stone) is unsurprising. \n3. If God is omnipotent, then, by definition, there necessarily cannot be a stone that is too heavy for him to lift (otherwise he would not be omnipotent). \n4. If there necessarily cannot be such a stone, then it is an impossibility. \n5. By Aquinas’s reasoning, even an omnipotent being cannot perform impossibilities. \n6. Therefore, by definition, inability to create a stone too heavy for one to lift is no barrier to being omnipotent. (In fact, only non-omnipotent beings can create objects too heavy for themselves to lift.) \n\nBUT: both Aquinas and Mavrodes assume that God cannot do impossible things. Is this right? Descartes, for one, thought not. Descartes believed God could make 2+2=5. Why? Because otherwise you are suggesting that God is bound by the laws of logic. But if God created the laws of logic, why should he be bound by them? Couldn’t he have made them differently?\n\nHarry Frankfurt:\nHowever, if we assume that God can do impossible things, then God can create a stone too heavy for him to lift (which is supposedly impossible). Furthermore, if he can do that, then he can go one stage further and lift that stone (also impossible – but what’s the difference between doing one impossible thing and doing two?) \nBUT: doesn’t that mean that the stone he created was not a stone too heavy for him to lift, and that we’re back to the situation of him being unable to create such a stone? Not according to Frankfurt:\nIf an omnipotent being can do what is logically impossible, then he can not only create situations which he cannot handle but also, since he is not bound by the limits of consistency, he can handle situations
939192
God owns you..and all the patents anyways..so why would he need to be patent? He made everything..owns everything..and controls all in the future. Yes we have freewill to be  idiots..but he still loves US. :)
902713
no...if it were possible there wouldn't be these fun debates on yahoo answers..gotta love some of these answers though lol..stuff exists..that means gods exists..nice!..and the ever popular..can you prove he doesn't....burden of proof is on the believer
622606
Some would ask, how could a perfect God create a universe filled with so much that is evil. They have missed a greater conundrum: why would a perfect God create a universe at all? \n\nSister Miriam Godwinson \n"But for the Grace of God" \n\n--Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri.\n\nCause GOD'S NOT PERFECT!\nHe makes mistakes, just as we do, mut since he has more power, when he screws up, it SUCKS for us.
581672
A god product?  Guess that would have to be to pray
1071025
Man created God in his own image
422031
i dont like the man but there is no way he could possibly do that...that would be like trillions or zillions of dollars...not even our economy can handle that kind of spending :)
1130112
haha, imagine the price of Jesus poo on ebay. thats what i would do if ebay was around, sell it.
929913
An argument could be made -- a yin yang comparison.  Even from a more traditional Judaeo-Christian perspective, since god is omnipresent, couldn't he be both god and satan?  A method of introducing free will, perhaps.
67596
There is no god, so it's impossible to test, but here we go...\n\nThis kind of question, usually phrased as "Could god create a stone so heavy that he, himself, could not lift it?" is important because it calls into question the basic tenets of belief in an "all powerful" entity. \n\nIf he can create such a stone, he is not all powerful.\n\nIf he cannot create such a stone, he is not all powerful.\n\nIt asks us to question the validity of such a theory, as cleary, nothing can exist that is "all powerful."\n\nIs it a silly question? Yes. Does it put forth a valid point? Yes. Asking questions of this nature will lead to further questions, which will eventually reveal the truth.\n\nThe most important thing is to keep asking, keep thinking and keep making people think.\n\nWell done. \n\nLove the burrito answer, D'oh!
56894
If you buy into Judeo-Christian mythology, God is the author of free will.  Satan is not a creator, but a perverter, and thus could not give to Adam and Eve an inherent quality that they did not already possess.
282425
No. I think anything is possible with God.