Examine with factural reference the impact of Nigeria debt management strategy on the national debt stock/econ
326575
sorry, couldn't find anything on google about it.\nhttp://scotthortonshow.com/\nmoney, http://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\nbush & clinton http://www.philipdru.com/triplett_stream.html\nisrael http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/webb_stream.html\niran http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=131
248665
I have a fiend in Nigeria who would like to help you find an investor for a small fee.  He is a true fiend...\n(Please ignore the rude person below.)
273377
The biggest problem of private and public investment in Nigeria is the poor grammar used in the emails trying to scam very ignorant people on the Internet.\n\nFortunately for the Nigerian spammers, there's now a resource available to help you "write better emails, make more moneys."  See the link below.\n\nSee the link below.
479948
On the other hand, having a little bit of national debt can be a good thing, because it allows the treasury to sell bonds on the debt, which is an important tool for monetary policy and allows the government to mitigate inflation.\n\nLots of debt is definitely a problem, though.  My theory on why people don't understand things like this (or act like they do) comes down to a combination of laziness, stupidity, and selfishness -- the unholy trinity of human failure.
785998
False.  Inflation decreases your purchasing power.  And it also decreases the value of your debt.
914067
Reliable FREE Stock Tips - BSE and NSE\n\nNSEMUMBAIBULL welcomes all investors to our fold of quality trading in sound equities. Our motive is to give reliable timely informations to all our clients with respect to buying, selling or holding on to the portfolio. If you observer, the scrips we had suggested to buy/sell/hold from the beginning of the launch of this financial service since February 2005 is indeed remarkable with everyone benefiting in the highly emerging largest booming Indian economy. For clients who are thinking of the safety aspects, our advice on mutual funds is worth considering. We wish once again everybody the best of times in equity trading and assuring once again of the continued reliable guidance always.\n\nVisit our website www.nsemumbaibull.com for more details\n\nHappy Trading and Investing\n\nNSEMUMBAIBULL\nDALAL STREET,\nMUMBAI, INDIA\nWebsite http://www.nsemumbaibull.com\nOur Group http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/nsemumbaibull\n----------------------------------------------------------------------------
546023
Sorry dude but ur question aint clear. \n\nR u saying investment on housing in Nigeria. Well this particular sector is generally handled by international ngos and they don't do an efficient and honest job. the people themselves will have to come up with a brighter plan i suppose
822196
THE NATIONAL DEBT WAS 900 BILLION WHEN JIMMY CARTER LEFT OFFICE AND WAS OVER 4 TRILLION AFTER THE REAGAN/BUSH/QUAYLE ERA WAS OVER.\n\nIT NEARLY FLATLINED DURING THE CLINTON ERA THEN CONTINUED TO SKYROCKET AFTER LITTLE BUSH TOOK OVER
711958
About 11.8%.\n\nWACC = Wd [Kd x (1-t)] + We (Ke)\n\nWhere:\nWd = Weight of Market Value of Debt (as a % of market value of capital)\nKd = Pre-tax cost of debt\nt = effective tax rate\nWe = Weight of Market Value of Equity\nKe = Cost of Equity (post tax)\n\nMarket cap of Dell: US$61.56b\nMarket cap of Dell debt: assuming at par (US$0.50b)\n\n\nCAPM to determine Ke: (4.61% + (11%-4.6%)*1.13) = 11.8%\nBeta = 1.13\nRm = 11%\nRf = 4.6% based on 30 year treasury yield\n\nKd (n/a in preliminary 2Q statements due to no balance sheet and n/a in 1Q due to not enough breakdown for interest expense).\nDell last disclosed it interest expense line item in 2004, which had an effective rate of 2.8%.  This is too low, so it has to be adjusted upwards.  Using a top-down approach, you can assume about LIBOR + 2% or about 7.3% for a medium-grade credit-worthy company like DELL.  \n\nTax rate is 23.8% per Oct-06 results (tax of $211m/PBT of $888m).\n\nWACC = 0.8% x (7.3%) (1-23.8%) + 99.2% (11.8%) = 11.8%\n\nSensitivity is really going to depend upon your Rm (market risk) mostly.
1036386
The best way is to get to know the company first!. What they do how they do. You need to understand it from A to Z. Then look at financial ratios like liquidity, trend on net income on teh p&L through past 3 years. If debt is increasing, find out what are they doig with loans and how is the  ROA, ROE, current assets to current liabilities should never has a decreasing trend on more than 3 years.
521479
updated continuously:\n\nhttp://www.toptips.com/debtclock.html
134054
Check Yahoo Finance link below.
470109
observed phenomenon in economics where the economy experiences booms and slumps. Any force that influences national income would influence the business cycle.\n\nY = C + I + G + NX\n\nNational Income = Consumption + Investment + Government + Net Exports.
1178470
Memorandum on Economic and Financial Policies of the Federal\nGovernment of Nigeria for 1999\nI.  Introduction\n\n\n1.  Nigeria has enormous economic potential. It has a vibrant private sector, highly motivated entrepreneurs, vast and fertile agricultural land, and a large domestic market. It is the seventh-largest oil exporter in the world (2 million barrels per day) and is richly endowed with other natural resources as well.\n\n2.  Yet Nigeria's economic and social development remains far below even the minimum expectations of the population. Per capita income amounted to only US$240 in 1997, substantially below the level at the time of independence in real terms. Equally disturbing, the country's social indicators have slipped to well below the average for developing countries: half the population lives in absolute poverty, life expectancy is only 52 years, and the infant mortality rate is as high as 84 per 1,000 live births. Mismanagement of our resources, overregulation of our economy, and, until recently, price and exchange rate distortions, have been at the root of Nigeria's economic malaise.\n\n3.  In recent years, some progress was made in stabilizing the economy, introducing greater competition, and strengthening the financial system. Inflation was brought down from 77 per cent in 19941 to 10 percent in 1997 and the exchange rate has remained stable. Exchange controls on current international transactions have been almost fully eliminated, interest rates have been deregulated, and restrictions on competition and private sector participation have been removed in most sectors of the economy. A number of measures have also been taken to address financial sector distress, including raising the minimum paid-up capital requirement, liquidating insolvent banks, improving loan recovery, and imposing sanctions for financial malpractice.\n\n4.  However, the fiscal adjustment that helped achieve macroeconomic stability did not pay adequate attention to the quality of public spending. While very large sums were spent on priority projects of doubtful viability, basic infrastructure—roads, water supply, sewerage, and electricity—was allowed to deteriorate to its current state of severe disrepair. State and local governments, which are responsible for the bulk of social services, also bore a disproportionate burden of the adjustment in spending. Moreover, economic activity continued to be hampered by poor performance of the large public enterprise sector, which led, in particular, to severe shortages of power and fuel, as well as inadequate telecommunications services. In addition, poor governance and abuses in the management of public resources have been severe obstacles to realizing the potential of the private sector, which would allow Nigeria to reduce its present heavy dependence on petroleum for foreign exchange earnings, government revenues, and economic growth. \n\n5.  Moreover, our external debt remains large. Over the last several years, the government serviced only part of its external debt. Interest not paid and interest accruing on unpaid debt service became new debt. Thus, despite the imposition in 1994 of an embargo on contracting new debt—as well as the low level of disbursements from existing commitments and ongoing debt conversions and buybacks—the outstanding stock of external debt has failed to decline. At the end of 1998, the stock of debt disbursed and outstanding stood at an estimated US$28.8 billion, and of this, some US$17.7 billion represented arrears, almost entirely to Paris Club creditors. The latter included some US$1.3 billion overdue payments on loans contracted after October 1, 1985, the cutoff date to be eligible for rescheduling that was established in the first of Nigeria's three past Paris Club reschedulings.\n\n6.  The sharp decline in world oil prices in 1998—and the ensuing one-third fall in oil receipts (US$5 billion)—has aggravated Nigeria's already difficult
1124702
no not at all.  First of all national deficit is the sum of all deficits including your credit card and national spending.  Secondly national income is the income that comes in not only from tax, tariffs, savings, etc but also from buying and selling of goods abroad in the name of the US government.  \n\nI could go on and on but the key here is that national income is not easy to calculate.  There are hidden / undisclosed accountants that are not publicized and despite what people say, it is still a part of the national income.   When you add all that up, the income is actually a debt. LOL and you owe the government thousands of dollars.   \n\nSorry for the complicated and bad news. LOL
1064932
NIGERIA’s foreign debt profile now stands at $32 billion while it owes local contractors N1.3 trillion
228551
P/E, growth, leverage, price variance, income variance