Is Mission Impossible 3 going to live up to all it's hype or not?
536015
I hope not.\nTom cruise is a jacka$$
1179976
Yes. A lot of action, pretty intense. Better than 2 but not as good as 1.
555306
SORRY BUT PANDERING TO THE HYPE, WRONG WORD PERHAPS!! IN MY HUMBLE OPINION IT WAS A FILM MADE WITH AN EYE ON THE BOX OFFICE. WELL SHOT PRESENTED BUT PURELY HYPOTHETICAL, AND IT STILL LEFT ME WONDERING \n\nTOO MUCH EMPHAISE ON THE WHOLE SCENARIO OF THAT HORRIBLE DAY AND DARE I SAY IT PERHAPS THE FILM COMPANY WAS CASHING IN!!!!
1180069
Mike Myers wants to create another Austin Powers outing and suggests that the timing is getting near, especially considering there is going to be a new Bond...possibly...sometime...From Entertainment Weekly through Coming Soon:\n\n"There is hope!" says Myers about the popular comedy franchise. "We're all circling and talking to each other. I miss doing the characters." The first three films have earned a massive $675 million worldwide, so New Line Cinema is probably looking forward to another installment as well - and what better time than with a new James Bond movie on the way?
705953
Yeah i purchased it on DVD  the other day. as i never got a chance to catch it at the cinemas. And what i would say is that it's good however as the media had portrayed it of being the best out of the three. I didn't think it was that good to be able to say that. Some of the action scenes are good but could've been better. And it can never be compared to James Bond as 007 is a 45 year old franchise and still doing extremely well. Have you seen Casino Royale?........... you'll realise the difference if you've watched it. Ian Fleming the guy who created Bond was i would say a genious who created a character that has so many different shades and is loved by people all around the world. Tom Cruises Mission Impossible Franchise just can't come even close to James Bond. \n\nI don't know what Cruise thought that lets make an american spy movie francise but the answer is no.
1008186
No, I don't listen to critics at all.  They are never correct on how good or bad the movie is!  As for an X-Men 4... Read on.\n\nThere will be an X-Men 4.  It's already in the works.  But, it won't be called X-Men 4 since it is going to center around Wolverine and won't involve the X-Men.  In an interview with iF Magazine, X-Men scripter Simon Kinberg talked about the Wolverine solo film starring Hugh Jackman.\n\nRegarding whether there was any pressure on him knowing that there was a spin-off movie coming after X3: "Wolverine doesn't exactly come after X3 so what happens to him is not terribly relevant to his own movie," Kinberg said. \n\n"We did talk about a couple of characters that they wanted to save for the Wolverine movie spin-off. I can't tell you who they are, but there was really only one we wanted to use for X3, and they said they're not going to have a big enough part to risk losing them for Wolverine. Sabretooth will be in there, but I don't know in what form. I think his relationship with Wolverine is under explored. \n\n"I like X1 a great deal, I thought the tone was fantastic and thought the X-Men were great, but I was a little under whelmed by the Brotherhood in that movie," he told the magazine. "I thought the secret island lair and Magneto's plot were confusing to me, and Sabretooth and Toad were not as strong as Mystique. I like working with actors who have inhabited their characters for a while, and I welcome their input. Hugh has lived with Wolverine for five years and he knows this character better than anybody. He knows him better than Chris Claremont or better than Avi Arad, and certainly better than any of us working on this film. Hugh was also a producer on this movie, and we worked really closely with Hugh on Wolverine. The most conversations that I had with actors on this movie were with Hugh about Wolverine and Famke [Janssen] about Phoenix. They both are incredibly smart people who had a lot of intelligent informed questions about the characters. I would say the most input about Wolverine came from Hugh and not the studio."
667486
House of wax,x men 2 and Mission Impossible 3.
622466
That is Mission impossible 4.
1160968
JULY 28TH!!  The launch in major cities across America and thereafter.  From what i've researched, it will be scary.  However, I believe it will only be scary to those who can still think for themselves.  This is NOT about Democrats and Republicans, people.  This is about what we really know about America's history and for you to ask yourself 'What if....'.  Just 'what if the message from this movie happens to be true'?  What would you do?
546279
I just came back from the theater myself....I was kind of dissapointed, it lacks of the surprise factor of the book and the way the clues a presented in a way that the reader can become part of the solving of the riddle, on the contrary, on the film, the  \nriddles are solved in a very obvioud way it seems unreal..it is an average film but surely it will become a big blockbuster due alll the buzz it has generated.
808036
The previews do look good, but the movie will probably blow. The last great Rocky was part 2, and even that didn't come close to part 1.\n\nIt's just Stallone milking the last drop of money out of the Rocky franchise. Doesn't even have Adrian.Talia Shire probably refused to do it after watching Rocky 5. \n\nOne thing I like about this movie though, is how his age brings back the underdog aspect of Rocky. In part one he  was no hero, just some looser shylock. Now he gets to be some broke down old man, not a hero. Underdog is what Rocky is all about, not fighting some jerk azz Tommy Gun behind some bar.
714936
Oh definately.\nHostel was OK but it took a while to get going and there wasnt much excitement. Saw 3 kept me on the edge of my seat.
432144
I believe it will be a good movie, besides with the world cup knocking at the door  we all are eager to see everything about football.\nI have heard  that the movie has a good production a some good actors, them we have to wait until  may 12\n\nI THINK WILL WORTH IT¡¡¡
698996
I'm with you Buddie. Remake after remake. I guess it's ok for the younger generation who hadn't seen these movies before, but let's get serious here, What were they thinking when ANOTHER King Kong came out?? Ok, graphics have improved, but couldn;t they change the storyline a little?
494483
Sure I will. Tom Hanks is a great actor.  The story line is fiction.  Sure in the preface Dan Brown makes a fool of himself by making false claims, but he states the story line is fiction.  If as a Christian I'd go and see Mission Impossible Three, surely i'd view the Davinci Code.  In fact, I look forward to seeing it.\n\nAnd further more, even if the book is "hersey", you can't argue with the results.  Whether or not Dan Brown intended it, more people are seeking out the truth behind the book and finding Constantine and the real Gospel.  I think God works in some powerful ways...\n\nPlus, the movie itself opens up a whole new area of witness that can be used for ministry.  We are called to be able to provide an answer for our faith.  If a non-believer's question comes from something within the film, i'd like to be able to give him a clear answer.
624540
Haven't seen it yet...but it looks interesting.\n\nIMDB's users seemed to enjoy it greatly, rating it a 10, 426 times.\n\nhttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067072/ratings
564754
I am not quite sure what your are asking, but MI3 made about $48 million in it's opening weekend. I dont know the exact figures for MI1, but MI2 made $57.8 million.  They expected MI3 to make over $60 million but fell quite short.  I think it just has lost it's appeal.  Now a days the big box office draws are comic adaptations, animated family movies, or horror/suspense movies.  The action movie hasnt been as sucussful as it used to be.