whats up with the 6-6-6 thing??
547690
its quite possible paranoa, but come on mankinds always had its little paranoa. communism taking over the world, the end of the world, hiding under table protecting you from nuclear explosions, and more recently Y2K. but it is based on some truth the devil and his angels numbers are 666 to corspond with humans being 555 for imperfect and mortal and god being 777 for perfect and immortal
818846
maybe yahoo had a stat incorrect and changed it. 2.5 points probably wont be a big deal by the end of the season... i wouldnt lose sleep over it and piss off everyone else
1013241
no.\n\n36/6 = (6*6)/6 = 6/1\n\n6/0 is undefined
1112840
like the lottery? its a lottery - you gotta mark 6 crosses on a coupon with 36 numbers (or is it 42?) and on wednesday and saturday they will pick the 6 numbers that will win the pot - thats about it
427371
Well, the factors of 6 which are 1 2 3 and 6 do add up to 12, which is twice the original quantity.  Other numbers like this are 1 and 3.  Math is awsome.
404604
6-1-2-4-3-5 I dont know it's been awhile since highschool
195987
although there can be some patterns seen in the numbers it is not a repeating decimal and can be taken out to a lot more decimal places then humans can calculate.  Also if you put it into fraction (22/7) that is the most accurate way to actually utilize the number.
742231
I don't understand "readability" either, but I could point out that I would replace "to the power of " with the uppercase character on your 6 key, the "^". So 4.06 x 10^5 is the way I'd do it.
763343
Heartsense is right.  I'm chiming in to say if you mean the product of 5/6 * 6/7 * 7/8 * 8/9 * ..., then that product tends to 0 since the denominator of the nth term cancels out with the numerator of the (n+1)st term, so as n approaches infinity, you get 5 over infinity (not really "over infinity" but you know what I mean) = 0.
902604
it is 6. If you look at the profile it should telll you
474532
a couple of years ago i discovered my social security number has 6 six's inside of the numbers, it scares the daylights out of me, i wonder who the hell would have 666-666-6666??
16160
its 1, 2, sqrt (3). i dont know what u mean by 6,6 over 3,12
58688
I can show that the answer is 25927 without using computer.\n\n\nFirst, we can ignore 1000000 since its sum of digits is not 18. Also, let's add 0's in front of numbers to have 6 digits if the number has less than 6 digits. So our range is going to be from 000001 to 999999.\n\nNumber of partition of 18 into 6 whole number is\n(18+6-1)C(6-1)=(23)C(5). Assign these 6 numbers to the 6 digits.\n\nNow, we need to remove the cases where one digit is 10 or bigger. It is very good thing that two digits cannot be 10 or bigger, as the sum would go over 18.\n\nLet one digit has x, where x>=10. The sum of the other 5 digits is 18-x. Since 18-x is partitioned into 5 whole numbers, we have (18-x+4)C(4) possible ways. This should be multiplied by 6 since the big digit can be the first digit, second digit, ..., sixth digit. x is from 10 to 18. So we need to calculate 6((12)C(4) + (11)C(4) + .... + (4)C(4)).\n\nSince (n)C(m)+(n)C(m+1)=(n+1)C(m+1), we get\n(4)C(4) + (5)C(4) + (6)C(4) + (7)C(4) + .... + (12)C(4)\n=((5)C(5) + (5)C(4)) + (6)C(4) + (7)C(4) + .... + (12)C(4)\n=((6)C(5) + (6)C(4)) + (7)C(4) + .... + (12)C(4)\n...\n=(13)C(5). (This shows beauty of mathematics, doesn't it?)\n\nTherefore, the answer is (23)C(5)-6*(13)C(5)=25927.
614616
No, I don't.  Nothing happened on June 6, 1906.  Or June 6, 1806.  Furthermore, the number is not really "666."  It is 6-6-06.  If you are going to leave out the second to last numbers, and only give the very last number, then June 6, 1996 would have also been a candidate for something bad to happen.\n\nThis is just a silly scare as I see it.
1138398
6\ni don't know why, i was born on the 6th, and in the 6 o'clock hour (6:58), maybe that has something to do with it... i jave just always liked the number 6, and it's always worked for me
408919
Hmm, I hope the reason is not because 4 is IV and 6 is VI in roman numerals. If so, I can't finish the proof by explaining why someone would perceive IV and VI as the same number :)
1159067
he's right, some people's 6paks aren't symetrical. i think mens fitness magazine talks about that sometimes. i've seen it in shape, too.