does a parisite have brain?
551406
Which parasite?\nBacterial, viral, protozoa etc = no\nLeech, insect, helminth etc = sort of \nCuckoo, vampire bat etc = yes\n\nI think there are parasites in every phyla.
17157
The short answer is 'yes' unless you are referring to sight.\n\nThe right and left hemispheres of the human brain are connected by a huge nerve bundle called the corpus callosum. In the male fetus when male hormones are generated the corpus callosum shrinks reducing cross-communication. Because the left hemisphere deals with logic and the right hemisphere deals with emotion, women connect all logic better with emotion than men do. Although a man can chose, he is always either logical or emotional but rarely both at the same time. A man either flies off the handle or thinks the problem through. A woman can weep or laugh when she discovers something that makes sense. This explains why women are better at nurturing (cranky) children and men are better at hunting for bears (or a six pack).  Of course men can care for their children and women can hunt bare; I mean bear.
807539
c'est la mentalité lyonnaise.\nrien de surprenant quand on met les pieds dans cette ville.
824785
My pick is Beyonce!! She is more talented in her little finger than what Paris Hilton is. Paris may have more $$, but I would rather be associated with someone who seems down to earth rather than a snob! (my opinion)
414790
Just because you got a big brain...Lady
707171
Yea someone with an intellect that is not in an atheletic supporter.
580886
I agree with death_cab.  By acknowledging that you are a ditz you did in fact prove that you weren't a ditz.  Like he said a true ditz wouldn't be intelligent enough to realize her ditziness.  :)\n\nSince you don't meet the intelligence requirements for ditzhood I'm giving you the title of "bubbly" or "fun" depending on the situation.  If anyone has a problem with this classification just tell them the internet told you so.
185790
French?\n\nI know that she speaks French, and that she knows it (obviously, or she wouldn't speak it).\n\nHmm...\n\nI think that she is FRENCH!!! Am I right???
750339
Well, depending on what kind of "mentally challenged" you mean, the answer could be yes or no.\n\nThere are several kinds of neurological disorders that result in a brain that is simply differently wired, with IQs in the normal range or higher. Because the brain is extremely adaptable, it will often compensate for deficits in one area by making other areas work more efficiently. That's why a blind person often has very good hearing: He doesn't have any visual input to process; so his brain specializes on the next most informative sense: Hearing.\n\nSome disorders are like that. ADHD is associated with originality; autism with very good visual-spatial skills; bipolar disorder with creative talent, especially in the arts. So people with these disorders are also more likely to have talents that people without them don't have. People with these disorders look at them as mixed blessings, or even as gifts.\n\nI don't know what it's like to be anyone but myself; so I don't know which disorders other than my own (Asperger Syndrome, a mild form of autism) fit into the category I just described. And I do consider AS to be a gift, in some ways. I'm socially clumsy, and I can't tolerate some sensory input; but I also have very good logical reasoning skills, I approach problems in original ways, and I have quite a lot of talents in my areas of special interest.\n\nBut all in all, people with psychological, neurological, or biological isorders that affect their mental functioning have one big problem: They are square pegs trying to fit into round holes. They are not the majority; so the world is not designed for them. It could be prejudice or the need for accomodations or some aspect of the disorder itself; but being ill-suited for the world you live in can be a difficult thing. Even your talents may not be the sort of thing the world is looking for.\n\nRegarding people with low IQs and severe disorders with no positive aspects. Individual personalities may indeed make them feel superior to others, just as neurologically average people may feel superior to people in general, whether their IQs are higher or lower than their own; but that seems to be a personality trait unconnected to any disorder.\n\nFrom what I can tell, all but the most profoundly affected are aware that they are different; but in a loving family, with good support and the accomodations they need to live in the world, they need not feel inferior or unwanted. These folks have the same goal that any of us have--the pursuit of happiness, in whatever form that takes for them; and why should a happy life ever be called an inferior one?
464735
Maybe she can if she is smarter than them.
685527
a brain the ability to communicate and make decisions. One who can ask and tell her opinions.\n\nGood luck and God Bless!!
116906
Yes, women can, as long as they have a brain.
1152236
la france question idiote
570339
try\nwww.parisethelord.com
320677
beauty with brains!!!!<<<<----thats me!!! ask my fianceee...hehe
108327
It has never been proven whether language is a learned behavior or a natural tendency in human beings.  Regardless, no genes are tied to language - some do influence the capability to vocally speak though.  Interestingly enough, the Greeks believed that if you couldn't speak, you couldn't think.  In some ways, it is hard to imagine if it is possible to think without some kind of language element involved since it seems that all of our concepts are tied to a linguistic understanding - whether this language is vocal, sign, etc.\n\nEdit: To Agassi:  Agassi, you are completely misunderstanding what I'm saying, but I'll hold the fault of that to the limitations of the English language.  A PARTICULAR language may be learned culturally (i.e. "conditioning"), while language, in the GENERAL sense, may be a natural instinct (i.e. it is a natural, human yearning to communicate regardless of particular languages).  Hence the reason I used the term "language" as opposed to "a language."  In the French, it is the distinction between "langue" and "parole."  To simplify the question of language to "conditioning" cannot explain linguistic origins.  This is why some theorists say that we cannot ask the question of linguistic origins - because it throws their theories completely off and they cannot make sense of it.  Furthermore, with regards to the "part of the brain" comment - it has never been proven whether we affect the brain or the brain affects us.  It seems slightly more probable that we affect the brain, which would explain the increase in gray areas corresponding to the increase in learned languages.  This is why there are only theories pertaining to the acquisition of language.  To discredit what I say because you misinterpret is rather unfair.
1178956
Yes, they have brains.