is the davinci code movie any good?
553472
As long as you understand that it is pure fiction and not reality.
990039
It is a good movie.  i liked it.  It accomplishes what it intends to do which is slapstick.  The direction was a bit sloppy at points.  The director did not effectively use camera angles as well as they could have.\n\nThe actors developed the characters well considering this is a slapstick comedy which there is not a whole lot of room to develop then anyhow.
546279
I just came back from the theater myself....I was kind of dissapointed, it lacks of the surprise factor of the book and the way the clues a presented in a way that the reader can become part of the solving of the riddle, on the contrary, on the film, the  \nriddles are solved in a very obvioud way it seems unreal..it is an average film but surely it will become a big blockbuster due alll the buzz it has generated.
545936
The DaVinci Code enough said
1182281
It's a decent enough movie (which is in theatres, despite what some people are claiming).\n\nIt can be slow and plodding, but so was the first movie.  It is about character development, but it has its share of action.\n\nThe actor who played Superman did better than I expected.  Kevin Spacey is, of course, divine.  \n\nAnd once again, I have to ask why a supposed genius like Lex Luthor could make such pathetic mistakes.
559309
no I don't think it's a good movie, it is a great movie... it's a classic!\nThe guy who wrote it is dead and the guy who directed and filmed it is dead and it lives on.......vid you later!
608941
*** Good.\n\nIt was a bit too long, and it dragged on at the end. They also changed and left a bunch of stuff out of the movie that was in the book, which was a bit disappointing. But the suspense in the beginning and the thrills make it worthwhile.
595542
iv always love davinci book... its one of my faves now. but having a bad feeling towards the movie--- it was toned-down... has the church been conspiring with the screenwriter??? it did not put the book into real life... tom hanks and cocteau were lame.. THE DECENT ACTING.tsk...a realy BORING SUMMER MOVIE!\n\nI thought the book was hard to read but this\nmovie was even harder to sit through.\n it supposedly is the best film of the year.. \nDO U THINK THE DA VINCI CODE worth the\nLONG WAIT WE GAVE???\nbrrrrrrrrrrrr...\nANYWEI, ONE WUD JUST GO AND SEE the film\ndiscuss and debate.\nok, i enjoyed as bit...(,")
444227
Saw it twice and it rocked. In imax V was the bomb.\n\nGo see it in imax if you get the chance. See my review.
721813
All I know is that I will be going to see X3...Not The Da Vinci Code. But, I have a feeling that The Da Vinci Code will do better in theaters. A lot of people are curious about the movie whether they believe in what the novel claims or not. X3 Should do extremely well. Especially with some of the long awaited characters finally showing up. Beast, Juggernaut, Angel...etc.
11972
The film was abysmal.  Stylistically, there were some very good moments in the beginning, but that doesn't cut it.  This film is a good example of a film that substitutes style and visual aesthetics for substance.  Furthermore, Anthony Hopkins (usually a fine performer), Winona Ryder (here less than mediocre), and Keanu Reeves (who should never be cast in anything) were all miscast and the film suffered as a result.  Finally, the last act of the film is campy, boring, and poorly shot (we shouldn't be distracted during the film's climax by how much the scenerey looks like a soundstage).\n\nRegarding the book, however, it is clear that the film has used it only as a framework for its own machinery and spectacle.  This was not Bram Stoker's Dracula, but F.F. Coppola's re-reading of the book through the lens of a kaleidascope.
246964
It was a great movie. It kept you guessing about what would happen next. \n\nSPOILER: This is for Agent_Check who had questions about the end.\n\nHe had the diamond in his pocket because the robber put it there when he bumped into him at the end.
687985
saw it thursaday 5/18 in korea.\n\nit was a good film, a fiction film, no more no less.
248150
that a good movie.i  would pay to get the movie. i am when it\ncome out in stores.
356410
Yes, I've seen it and I thought the movies was good.
490818
I bought for me and 4 friends. They bought the popcorn and soda. I was the only one who read the book first. It was so good I had to see the movie. I wasn't disappointed. Everyone loved the movie. \n\nThe movie was very close to the book, but the reading the book first is a good idea, because it's a complicated mystery and requires you to think a bit. \n\nI'd say the professional movie critics didn't like it because it was a cerebral, intellectual movie as opposed to a slam-bang, shoot 'em up, fireworks and explosions, SFX kind of movie. It isn't a WOW! LOOK AT THAT! kind of movie, but it is definitely a WOW! \n\nThe dialogue definitely stabs the Catholic Church right between the eyes and this is another reason why many people have a problem with it.\n\nEnjoy the mystery, the chase, the plot and the shocking surprises, one right after another. I would definitely pay to see it again, but only for the purpose of entertaining a friend who hasn't seen it.
912409
Ok the most easy way to get around such a question would be :The book is better than the movie".It actually counts for 98% of the adaptations.But The DaVinci code fits in the 2% of the cases where the movie is actually better than the book.\n \n       First of all Ron Howard (a beautiful mind) is a great director.The book itself did not appear so great to me having a rather bad character development (leading to the dissapointing revelation of the finale) and having the scientist explain it everything so that anybody can grasp the action is too much artifialism for me.For example Langdon dont need to explain the history of Paris to a french woman who herself is an Academic.This appears to a point in the movie but since the action is preety more spectacular it covers it uo.\n\nAlso the book has no fluidity.The chaptres last 2 1&#92;2 half pages maximum and the action is cut much to often.This leads to a confusion because you get to a point where the change of background-people leaves you with a strange sence.The movie is far better.The director not willing to follow all the cuts and changes of the author produces a more solid scenaro leaving the audience understand the changes.For example Langdon and the girl in the book seem (not ARE )the same in the beginning and the end which does not happen to the movie.\n    The standard motto is "go with the book".But this time I will choose the film instead