Is it true that Gambit from X-Men isn't going to be in the movie "X-Men3: The Last Stand"?
544283
Thats true. They got everyone else, not Gambit. He comes into the picture later.
563643
*****SPOILER****  SPOILER****Remember when Professor Charles Xavier was giving the lecture to the students about their poweres and abilities and he had them watch the guy in the hospital bed? He talked about ability transferring if they had the power to do that and what benefits it could have and the ethics of it, etc etc?\n\n\nWEll in the very end after the credits...it shows a female Dr enter a hospital room, she checks in on the patient then we hear Prof Xavier's voice say,"Moira" and she replies "Charles?" so, this is Dr. Moira MacTaggart and Prof Xavier has transferred is mental being into this man. Leaves it open to sequal of course...especially with the fact that Magneto could start moving the chess piece even if it was slight..showing only temporary cure that does not last.
560501
There won't be another X-Men movie as a whole...\nBut there's a very, very good chance Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) will be getting his own movie.  :]\n \nThat'll be f♥cking sweet.
718868
it really didnt show in the movie but ill go with when angel became archangel. the story and the plot would be the same as is in the pages of the comics. and best of all, apocalypse would be there. although magneto is really one of the best villian of the x-men, but apocalypse is one of the deadliest and surely the baddest. and the x-men and magneto can team up just to battle apocalypse and his horsemen. exciting isn't!
495511
Why choose? They all sound pretty good.  I'm a huge Spider-Man fan, so I'm definitely chomping at the bits to see the third installment of this series.  Also, I saw X-Men 3 at a Sunday matinee, & they had a preview for Ghost Rider.  It looks really good, & was a lot better casting of Nicolas Cage than his proposed role as Superman a few years ago.  As for the rest of the movies, I had heard they had all hit production snags & still weren't 100% certain if or when they would be developed & released.  Also, I heard Hulk 2 is supposed to go direct to video, with David Dukovney (may have misspelled that) as Banner?  I thought Eric Bana should have returned to the role, but hopefully the movie still does well, & goes to Sci-Fi Channel like Man-Thing (another really good Marvel movie).\n\nBy the way, please tell me the guy that said Tom Cruise is playing Tony Stark in Iron Man is wrong.  I absolutely sick to death of Tom Cruise!
254643
i would like to see omega red,deadpool,apocalypse,gambit and wolverine without the adamantium claws. \n\nAlso silver surfer, i knows hes not an x-man but hes been in the comic a few times
640876
I'm not sure what your question is... The last question you had about magneto is the reason why they want us to come back to watch X-men 4. And the scene after the credits was a guy waking up in a hospital bed with the nurse saying "Charles?" Replying to Charles Xavier... you know, Professor X. Well, recall in the beginning of the movie when Prof. X was showing a video of a man in an unconcious state with a nurse next to him. Prof. X says that it is possible for a mutant to use another persons body to store their powers and soul into, and if it was ethical... well the end of the movie shows exactly this. Prof. X wakes up, using the unconcious man's body, calls the nurse, and it shocks her. She knew right away it was Professor X because she calls him Charles... \n\nAnd of course the movie was focused on Jean Grey because the comic and cartoon contained many episodes focused on her and her alternate identity, Dark Pheonix. It was by far the right time for it, because if you have ever opened the COMICS (the cartoon was slightly off also) Dark Pheonix began to spin off into a separate comic, but it never caught on. Also in the comic, Wolverine never kills Pheonix, the issue was actually unresolved if I remember.\n\nFor the sake of film, some items where changed. This ALWAYS happens when you adjust movies for cinema... like the Da Vinci Code.... that's another story.\n\nThis should answer your question about Beast and Arch Angel, in future episodes they may play more important roles, like Iceman and Pyro did in this episode.\n\nWith all of the characters and info that the movie leaves out, they really could have upwards of 20 sequels if they wanted to include every detail. I bet you never knew that Colossus is actually Russian, and in love with the girl who can walk through walls. Iceman was actually not interested in her... just because. The comic never had him and Rogue as love interests, because the comic depicted Rogue as an older woman (old as Jean Grey) who was in love with Gambit. Rogue was also capable of flying. MANY MANY MANY other issues are being left out.... Mutant related to each other, those that switch sides, change identities...\n\nOne last example of whats being left out... In the comic version, Juggernaut is actually Professor X's younger half brother, Mystique is Nightcrawler's real mother, however a foster mother of Rogue... making Nightcrawler and Rogue step siblings..... it goes on and on....\n\nI used to love the comic, now that I am grown, I enjoy the movie.
299211
are you talking about the fox  The animated  series.  or  the Wb  version? cause  if it's the fox  one, sorry there was no one of that description there.   I know there was a version of her in the  WB (m Warner brothers X-men Evolution  TAS. \n\n\n but  if your talking about comics. the only that fit's what you just asked for is Dani moon star of the X-men / new mutants/ X -force comics.  \n\nThat has shown up in X-men Evolution the animated series. \n\n if you want more info on the  fox TAS  for what  you seek  go to this link.  http://members.aol.com/drg4/x.html?f=fs you'll see that  \n\nyou'll  see there's was no one  of that discrption there. but if you mean  issue as in  the book. or the WB TV show  then that's a different story All together. \n\njust go to my profile  and click on the web site that leads you  to Mutatis Mutandis . and you'll find her profile on our  web site with her bow and psionic arrows discription in her bio's. on ether the wb  TAS or the comic.  \n\nAnd just to prove it to you, click this link. \nhttp://mutanthigh.com/smf/index.php?topic=703.0\n\nthat's dani moon star with her bow and psionic arrows. (her power makes the arrows.)  \n\nI hope that helps you out.
541087
Greetings. I watched X3 on Saturday and loved it. I heard about the 3 endings on Radio 1 so I told my partner to stay behind to watch the 3rd ending and she was blown away by it. From what I heard from an interview with Patrick Stewart, there will be a 4th film. If you remember back to the scene in the Danger room...remember the robot they were facing? That's a Sentinel. In the comic, that's their next enemy. So it's all set up and I can't wait!! Bye for now.
37675
You could aways go to IMDB.com and search for upcoming titles.  If your too lazy to look, x-men 3 will be out this year.
622820
i think it will be good,they have beast.thtas cool and Jean Grey comes back as the Phoniex..Jubilee was in the 1st X-men movies but she had more of a pose than a line.they mention her name in the movie........and thats true Gambit is my favorite x-men guy and he's not in it....Apocolypse would have been awesome to see..but i guess they replaced him woth Jugerrnaught.....it may seem to face to have apocolypse....
1081861
See Superman Returns, I am a die-hard X-men fan, but to see Spacey play the best Lex you will ever see, and to see a villianous plot that ONLY Superman could stop is very worth it, see X-men this weekend, but don't deny yourself one of the best comic to film movies ever tonight.  If you liked the first 2 Superman movies, this is a sequel to them (forget 3 and 4, Bryan Singer did)!\n  Also, X-men 3, although an epic movie, I was a little disappointed in how Pheonix was...or wasn't handled.
908672
As of right now the answer is no.  As far as I've been able to find out a number of the "supernaturals" aren't going to be featured in the "Civil War".  He does however have his own ONGOING series.  It is a good read and worth picking up.
922298
If you want a scoop I read one last week. Gambit will be there for the number 4. I forgot who will be the actor.
1166794
They said that there wont be another 'x-men' movie, thats why the third one is called the LAST stand. However they said that there might be another spin-off movie, such as a Wolverine movie, or a Storm movie, etc.
222733
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking here - but if you check out the X-men on wikipedia, I'm sure you'd find some information about the comic book version of the X-men and the silver screen version of the X-men.  Not that there's much difference, anyway - Singer, the director of the first two, and the screenwriters have kept the characters and the stories true to the comic book.
615956
According to his website, it sounds like he was going to be in X-3.\n\nAfter Singer left to direct Superman (He said he would have done X-3 after Superman, but 20th Century Fox was in a hurry to get it done) two different directors took on the role of director, Matthew Vaughn and then Ratner.\n\nGambit was also supposed to have a part and be played by Josh Holloway, but the character was to be too similar to the one he plays on Lost.\n\nMaybe the reason that Nighcrawler and others were excluded from this film is conflict with the actors and director(s).\n\nOr Ratner just decided he didn't want them in his movie.  It will be interesting to see the DVD and see any cut scenes that may have had these Mutants in them.\n\n\np.s. to The GODFATHER...Wolverine didn't kill Jean...He killed The Phoenix...No matter how they worked Jean/Phoenix into this movie, in the comics, they are two separate people, not two personalities in one body...