(law) what is required in a SWORN VERIFICATION...when used in the answering of interrogatories?????
547953
A sworn verification is a legal form that states that you are the Plaintiff/Defendant, that you have read the answers to Interrogatories and that they are true and correct. You sign that and it is notarized and then attached to your answers to interrogatories. They do that so that if and when your case goes to trial, and you change your answer on the witness stand, they can try to prove that you are lying.
1073961
An affidavit is simply a statement sworn as true in front of a 'commisioner of oaths', they will also sign the document. This is quite unusual; may I enquire what it is for/is it really necessary, in english law the only common use I have come across in relation to these is for a damaged will (an affidavit of plight must be obtained). You will need to see a lawyer anyway as they are likely to be able to sort this out for you, maybe even able to act as commisioner themself. Ask their advice while you are there.\n\nSorry I can not be of more help the Irish legal system is a bit different to the english.
1183929
Yeah, they'll want to verify your ID and legality prior to hire. Why are you so concerned about it?
498364
You can get your sworn statement of identity notarized if you bring with you two people who will swear to your identity and have state or federal issued photo ID. Bring them along with a statement of your identity to any notary public.
891105
You can find it at this site: https://www4.sss.gov/regver/verification_nc.asp
632903
I'm awake, but I can't find any list of states that require criminal registration.  Sorry, I'll keep trying!\n\nADDED INFORMATION: Sorry, I found nothing and I'm too lazy to go form state to state.
630598
Not only can they, in most cases they are required to. I'm not saying they do it.  Here is CA's law on it.\n\n834b.  (a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully\ncooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization\nService regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is\nsuspected of being present in the United States in violation of\nfederal immigration laws.\n   (b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected\nof being present in the United States in violation of federal\nimmigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the\nfollowing:\n   (1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen\nof the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent\nresident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time\nor as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of\nimmigration laws.  The verification process may include, but shall\nnot be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date\nand place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding\ndocumentation to indicate his or her legal status.\n   (2) Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien\nwho is present in the United States in violation of federal\nimmigration laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal\njustice proceedings, he or she must either obtain legal status or\nleave the United States.\n   (3) Notify the Attorney General of California and the United\nStates Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal\nstatus and provide any additional information that may be requested\nby any other public entity.
741791
The defendant cannot be compelled to testify against themself, which includes any statement (other than basic information when arrested such as name and address). Non-testimony (blood samples, hair, fingerprints, etc.) can be compelled.\n\nA defense lawyer cannot lie to the court. But the defense lawyer is not required to provide any information to the court that is confidential or that would hurt their client.\n\nThe court may determine that some information is not privileged, such as when the client says something to the attorney in front of other random people. That is a non-confidential communication, and the court can order the lawyer to disclose it. But that's rare.\n\nThe entire set of rules fills dozens of pages, and hundreds if not thousands of court cases. But that's the broad overview.
48354
Eligibility for what?  More information is needed in order to answer this.
395360
The other state need only show that there is a fair probability that you have committed a crime in another jurisdiction and you will be extradited.\n\nThis is a very low burden of proof, so unless you can show that you are the subject of a mistaken identification, you will eventually be extradited.
32973
The basic gist of it is that, in most cases the original document has to be entered into evidence. The whole text is in the site below.
975199
Get at least 3 people to verify who you are to sign a statement along with your signature at a Notary public. That should give them another form of proof that you are who you say you are.
12164
For the State of Washington:\n"DOL's collection of SSN information is mandatory under several state and federal laws." \n\n"Effective May 20, 2004, the Department of Licensing will begin verifying identity information (such as the Social Security number, SSN) that customers provide to ensure it matches data on record at the Social Security Administration."\n\nsee on-site references:
708670
a) A person commits an \noffense if, with intent that a capital felony or felony of the first \ndegree be committed, he requests, commands, or attempts to induce \nanother to engage in specific conduct that, under the circumstances \nsurrounding his conduct as the actor believes them to be, would \nconstitute the felony or make the other a party to its commission.\n(b)  A person may not be convicted under this section on the \nuncorroborated testimony of the person allegedly solicited and \nunless the solicitation is made under circumstances strongly \ncorroborative of both the solicitation itself and the actor's \nintent that the other person act on the solicitation.\n(c)  It is no defense to prosecution under this section that:                  \n(1)  the person solicited is not criminally responsible \nfor the felony solicited;\n(2)  the person solicited has been acquitted, has not \nbeen prosecuted or convicted, has been convicted of a different \noffense or of a different type or class of offense, or is immune \nfrom prosecution;\n(3)  the actor belongs to a class of persons that by \ndefinition of the felony solicited is legally incapable of \ncommitting the offense in an individual capacity;  or\n(4)  the felony solicited was actually committed.                             \n(d)  An offense under this section is:                                         \n(1)  a felony of the first degree if the offense \nsolicited is a capital offense;  or\n(2)  a felony of the second degree if the offense \nsolicited is a felony of the first degree.
311749
What did this person do before they met you? Were they in trouble? They had to do something for the department of corrections to have a record on them. Records are not made up.
1175007
More info needed. B/w perpetuate testimony and what?
473071
No, she has to do it.  The notary will verify her identity by picture ID