9/11? I bet none of you have ever seen this!!?
541270
I've seen all the videos like this. If you honestly believe that, you have some major issues you need to work out in your life. As bad as you think our President is, you must be able to comprehend he wouldn't do that, nor would he be able to get away with it. Don't believe everything you see on the Internet. Believe it or not, some of it's not true. There's an article written by Popular Mechanics called "Debunking the 9/11 myths". This was done by people that actually know what they are talking about-not some idiot in Mommy's basement-and published by a well-respected magazine. You can decide which you're going to believe but I think I'll go with the ones who do that stuff for a living.
1166933
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came
1007281
People are going to believe what they want to believe.  I saw a plane crash into a building.  Was it real or was it created by Hollywood.  The only people that really know are the one's that were there.  Al Qaida has taken resposibility for the 911 attacks. So? Who do you think did it?
435897
wow havent seen this one before...except the previous 100 times!
489244
I haven't seen it and don't really know if I have an interest in it.\n\nI think it is basically a telling of the "popular" version of what happened and I have seen Loose Change.\n\nWhen you start asking questions about "what is the most currenty information we have about the attack?", you really have to define who WE are. I think not everyone who really knows what happened is dead.\n\nIt's good to ask questions, even if it's dangerous. History takes a long time to let the truth slip.
368173
Did you forget that some of the people on Flight 93 were talking on phones to their families, who told them about the WTC? Those aboard who attacked the hijackers told family members of their plans. \n\nI haven't, but maybe you should see the movie, which has been approved by the families of those who died. \n\nAnd why would anyone rebuke the U.S. for shooting down a dangerous weapon?  Obviously those aboard didn't agree with you.
87593
No, I dont know anyone in the 9/11 tragedy...but when I heard aobut it, I was freaked out, but I was still a naive kid, but I wasnt screaming 'Mommy! Mommy!' I was in school when it happened (I think) and I had no idea until I got home when my mom told me. I wasnt too concerned...until now after I watched Farenheit 9/11 (really cool movie) and saw Bush's reaction to it, which got me against him. I mean, he's our leader and when some dude next to him says 'The nation's under attack', he does nothing except read to the little 1st graders. My point being: I HATE BUSH! and that I was freaked out about 9/11 :P
727542
Yes, I did watch it in its entirety, and I must say it made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. We all know that terrorists are already here in the US. The question is, what are they planning next. The radical islamists can plan and wait for 10 years before they do anything, the are so radical that they want their mission to be accomplished. What really bothered me about the progam was the teaching of the innocent children. These kids know nothing about what a suicide bomber is, or why they do what they do, They have no comprehension of who is a jew, and what the jewish religion is. Sitting here watching them chant death to America at age 3 was frightening. This is how they breed radical islam, by teaching these kids to hate at birth so they grow up not knowing any different. I believe this report to be true, and wish that a major network would  reair the piece because it is definetly something EVERY AMERICAN should watch.
329127
Unfortunately the American population are stupid. This entire 9/11 tragedy even turned my father (one of those conspiracy - down with the government people) into someone who drives around with a giant flag bumper sticker on his van and preaches military action! Instead of asking what we did to deserve such an attack. If we're seeing these things our government is doing now, what aren't we being shown?
1133783
This is a little long, but very insightful and thorough.  If you have some time you NEED to watch this.\n\nhttp://www.planetquo.com/Loony-9-11-Conspiracy-Theories\n\nI think that there is something bigger going on here.
866016
Looks like total crap to me.  And there's no way it's from 1993 if they make a reference to 9/11.  The website provides exciting, ground-breaking possibilities, but lacks any kind of scholarly or legitimately scientific reference.
996456
Melissa, \nJust for your Information, those are VERY Bogus anti-American films from someone out of England.\n\nThey assume that the USA put a missile through the Pentagon?  How stupid is that?\n\nNext they take words from politicians out of context.  Fairly common for Liberals anyways.\n\nIf the president FAKED 9/11, then there are 3000 fake dead people?\n\nThere are so many people who HATE the president SOO Much they would destroy this country to make sure that a democrat gets in charge?\n\nPay attention people.   Even Osama Bin Laden said he did it.\n\nStop giving aid and comfort to the enemy!
560700
Anyone that has ever been interested, this is the same old boring video that has been out forever on the net.  It is NOT one of the two high-speed or high-resolution videos confiscated from both a nearby gas station and the roof of a nearby hotel by the FBI.\n\nThough Fox News is saying that this now "explains everything, go back to bed folks", it answers absolutely zero real questions about 9/11.\n\nThe families of the victims of 9/11 gave a list of 263 pertinent questions to the 9/11 Commission.  They received clear answers to just 17.  They need to know what happened to their loved ones, and we as Americans deserve the truth.
68173
Yes..I have seen the vid...makes ya go hmmm...certainly an out of ordinary video..it was seen and recorded in Mexico...there have been numerous reports...and until last year no video..It is truly hard to say what it is...but it is very strange...almost like a jet pack...but..who really knows for now..I prefer to keep an open mind on things and not assume until more proof is shown..but as I said..the vid is interesting to say the least.
950996
I truly appreciate this question. \n\nTo all those who give the token thumbs down to a question like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks. \n\nInterestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, crashed 4 planes without any chance of prevention. \n\nThe following is irrefutable: \n\nFact: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI website. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care about him. \n\nFact: There are hundreds of televised claims from that day that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers.  These include firefighters, police, newsreporters, and civilians. \n\nFact: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symetrically in free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collpase as demolitions. Fire does not have the energy to do this.  \n\nFact: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of forensics. \n\nFact: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence. \n\nFact: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Penn. NORAD's has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. They also changed their story several times. \n\nFact: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families. \n\nFact: No one has been fired for 9/11. \n\nFact: The spike in put options on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines were never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates someone knew. Why not check out this lead? \n\nFact: The August 6, 2001 Public Daily Briefing Memo was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and the airline workers  have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?\n\nThe bottom line - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. Th
627907
I'm very weary of the conspiracy theories. As one of the people who watched the plane go into the Pentagon (literally watched it hit), it makes me very annoyed to see how many people think so many other people could be wrong, imaging things, or a part of a conspiracy. Maybe the theory would be credible if no one was around to watch.  But between NYC and DC/Arlington, both in the tail end of rush hour commuter traffic, you'd have to get about 50,000 people to agree to this conspiracy. I find it insulting and I am immediately annoyed by anyone who actually thinks these web sites are reporting the truth.
1030478
I watched it and now feel the arab terrorists didnt do it, but our own government..but before w ehave a chance to do anything the next catostraphe will have happned...why do tuhink everyday on CNN all they talk about now is global warming and impending disaster and how we are "not prepared"...another brainwashing so they can blow a chunk of the country up and say it was a meteor..then give us all RFID chips................... which are all already made...................look that up............ even two of the cell phone callers work for companies that make them.