Democrats...Hillary Clinton or Al Gore?
537628
I don't like Al Gore all that much....and I am not too sure I like Hilary's cautious speeches...\n\nI don't think either are willing to truly put themeselves "out there" to back up their rhetoric.
976916
I'd go with Jeb over Hillary. Hillary has already played her hand in what she would like to do (such as national health care and the like) and I simply do not agree with her social programs and approaches. Jeb, however, seems to have been able to deal with a multitude of issues and problems rather successfully in Florida, not to mention Florida knows how to keep taxes low. I would hope he'd bring those philosophies with him.
464897
Hillary Clinton is popular and seems electable. She gets under those male dominated neocons skin. She is not the best candidate, though. She isn't even a real liberal, she is more of a moderate.\n I hope the Democrats nominate someone who will take a strong stance on Iraq.\n Flag burning, immigration, and gay marriage are buzz issues that appear around election time. Lets get some progressive candidates that have a definite agenda for heath care, education, economic justice for working people, and a healthy environment.  Also demos should push their own agenda and not let the GOP define them with their negative campaigns.
730848
John Edwards is a great choice. Hillary will not run. Edwards could play the outsider wanting to make change. He also has no bad House or Senate record to use against him. I wonder if Democrats are that smart?
1525
It's entirely a matter of preference and opinion. \n\nWith that said: Bill Clinton. :)
594210
Gore, what a laugh.\nClinton a great president, he was one of the worst.\nShe Clinton, the lying, say-whatever-you-need-to-get-votes carpetbagger.  God help us.\nMcCain, maybe.\nEdwards...yawn.\n\nRice would be good.
391912
I think Al Gore should have been elected instead of Bush. We might as well have elected a crack addicted monkey. Oh, we did! My bad!
259037
Ann Coulter, the clinton thing would try to socialize medicine, transportation and anything else. If a pig was running against that clinton thing, I'd vote for the pig.
589733
I think he'd go with Bob Barker. Gore needs someone beside him who makes him look alive.\n\nBesides, if you take into consideration the fact that the libs are living in a Category F5 moral vacuum, this sh*thead will be the one looking for his running mate in 2008. He'd almost make Teddy look good, you think?
436329
Definitely Hillary!\nMy only concern about her possibly running is that it is true that women are their own worst enemies and, subsequently, will not vote for a woman.  This would keep them from voting for a Dem. and we'd end up in the same boat we're already in!  I don't, personally, think I could stand another four years of this!\nI used to think John McCain was a good guy.  The more I see of him and hear from him these days, the less I like of him.  He has swayed much too far to the "right", as they like to think themselves, and I do believe that ALL republicans are smarmy liars... because they can and do get away with it!
665245
Probably Clinton or Gore.  The way things are going, by 2008, the country will be begging the democrats to please please take over and make things right, no matter who they nominate.
1141656
It would be nice to have Clinton back in office, or even his wife...for a change. But definitley a democrat, and definatley NOT Bush, or anyone connected to him!!!!
93680
Well you look like a happy individual so I would have to say Bush.  If you had a scowl or whining face, I would say Gore.
897108
LOL Ingerk.\n\nIf the question was about fart jokes then definitely W.  Otherwise Clinton.
628478
Why is everybody hammering the poor guy, are you seriously saying Al Gore would have been a better president, I seriously doubt it. Now don't get me wrong I despise the guy most of the time...we just don't agree, but hammering him about something he hasn't even done yet...is stupid. Our country got weak, especially when Clinton was in office, and we got bombed. We had to do something, and I think no matter who was our president at this moment, most people would still hate him, but he didn't bomb us, and he didn't sit on his @$$ and do nothing when our people were killed. I don't agree with him, but once again I think he's doing the best he can for one man. Let's see you do it...don't judge a man until you walk a mile in his shoes.
523979
obama...no contest...and the other two i dunno its tough because i would pick hillary but she has too much up against her not even including the oppostion...but i guss ill pick her anyway
883151
I agree with it whole heartedly.\n\nAl Gore is strong, perhaps strong enough to win his party's nomination for President, but he doesn't have the strength, the inclination nor the support of the American voters.\n\nObama is a huge threat to Clinton- but both would make excellent progressive Presidents. Obama, if he waits, will have to defend himself to the American public over claims that he misled the voters by signalling his intentions to represent them as a Senator and not the President.\n\nThe Republican party will have a really tough time with the '08 elections, and God willing they won't be returned to office. You only need look at the good fmr President Clinton and VP Al Gore did to see how great America could be. Only no one remembers the good because of the scandals and the Right wing Republicans determined to undermine him at any opportunity.\n\nIf the Republicans want to win the 08 elections they need to start grooming strong candidates now!\n\nHillary, in conclusion- will win the Democratic nomination for President of the United States. And will be incredibly tough to beat.\n\nHer husband is a very clever politician and still mega popular. Just look at the rallies they did for Hillary recently.\n\nShe's be the first female President in US history, popular with Mums, women, family groups, minoritys etc... \n\nAnd thats what the world needs- a woman!\n\nThe Iceman.