Is sense two day ago is that right or is it a different word?
549840
I think you're looking for "since".\n\nFor example:  I can't stop thinking about that movie since I watched it last weekend.
544280
may 27 th is the likely date ... give or take 2 days
314155
Today.  It's a lot less stressful when you do things in advance because then you don't have to worry about it later.  \n"Work hard, play hard."  :)
1147043
i wached it 2 days ago!
1120763
would it be before last tuesday
62035
Mr. Werecow is correct as far as the mostly used word is concerned about.\nBut, what you have asked for is the most likely word. That, I understood as the word spelt by many people when they are asked for "Tell a word in English?". In this case upto 70% of the people will say the word "word". So, it should be the most likely one.\n"word"
251060
What day is it today, again?
566319
either is acceptable..\n\nthough, if you would be using the sentence in theme papers.. or any formal writing..\n\nyou should use the second..\n\nthis is for the reason that when a number is present in a sentence..\n\nit is only appropriate that you affix the word "for"..\n\nexample...\n\nwe were trekking for four days (it wouldn't seem formal if you use "we were trekking four days")
1142614
When Will Then Be Now?\n\nSoon.
495077
after me!!\n\nAMBERday!!!! after friday...
815658
I think in a couple of days\n\n:> peace\n.
511257
I would say 2 and 4 but those are still gramatically incorrect.  It would be better to say "I got out of school/work early today."
667732
In the kind of situations that you have highlighted, the sentence, which would sound much more appropriate than others, would be "Future Indefinite" as the time factor can't be determined definitely and the process is neither continuous nor perfect. According to the rules of the tense, the correct option in the given example would be "What time will your plane leave?".
968926
I know you're going to hate me for pointing this out, but either one is grammatically correct. There is no right or wrong here. It's simply a question of degree. To what degree has your optimism impacted you? What are you really trying to say? Your intent will determine which word you choose. Say each one out loud and go with the one that feels right for your intended message.\n\nAnd by the way -- it's "moments like these WHEN" (not where).
23129
Dude its gotta be tomorrow!!!! cuz i mean, tomorrow is always coming, but like tomorrow is never here! its always... tomorrow! I mean you say like tomorrow i'm going to the movies, then tomorrow comes but right when it gets here, its today. So today is never tomorrow cuz that'd just be silly. TSo the answer is tomorrow!!!
379428
We have 4 different past tenses in Spanish, and "sabia" (the verb is saber=to know") is conjugated in "preterito imperfecto", with this verb you are saying that "you did already know something, before it happened". However, using "supe" that is conjugated in "preterito perfecto" she is saying that she realized that "it is better" in the past, and she still knows so far that "it is better", but she can forget that fact tomorrow.
186597
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.