If the Great U.S.A. cant even find Osama Bin Laden how could they have a border with Mexico ?
552144
That was a stupid question. They are the neighbors that border the US.
96792
be a little more specific. Currently the Mexican side is checking vehicles prior to accessing the bridge to the US side. This is meant as a precaution and to boost Mexico's image.
721721
First, there have been documented border incursions, they are not a myth. Second, the border is not well marked in many areas so mistakes can happen. Third, the most likely reason for these incursion is illegal activity, mostly smuggling (drugs, guns, people). The Army and Cops in Mexico are crooks. Many are on the payrolls of the drug gangs. So why not provide some "protection" and make a buck?
1123726
For all of you who say that the U.S does not care where Osama Bin Laden is, think again.  The United States is asking $50 million for him.
749351
What the heck would we need with Mexico ?
781611
My best guess would be that Canada and Mexico at least will listen, rather than dictate. Wasn't a bad question until you added the last part, bigger fences don't make for better neighbours, the Canada/U.S. border has been an example for the rest of the world to strive for. The Mexico/U.S. border could be as well if current laws were enforced. 'Nuff said
750408
Yes, it is all those things.  And this is our government in collusion.  And most Americans are afraid of being uncaring if they say or think that we should secure the border so the terrorists stop walking across.   Think about it:  Most Americans cannot come to the point where they say we should secure our borders so that terrorists will stop walking in.  All they focus on is how mean it is to send poor people back to their country and how it is un-Christian to demand secure borders.  So, are we to understand that it is Christian-like to leave the border porous so terrorists can continue to flood in to put together dirty bombs to kill millions of Americans?  Is that what Christianity is all about?   You people - and you know who you are - cannot have it both ways even if you avoid the bad news.  It is still gonna happen and you people die as easily as the rest of us.  Stop being pathetic and think for yourself.\n\nNOTE TO ELPIBE:  READ THE QUESTION AGAIN.  MEXICO PROVIDES THE ENTRY POINT.  MEXICAN NATIONALS (TEENS AND YOUNG MEN) MAKE UP ALMOST ALL THE GANG HOMICIDES WHICH NUMBER IN THE HUNDREDS AND GROWING.
350449
The Southwest belongs to the United States. It has since the 1800s. Why all of a sudden, are people claiming it belongs to Mexico? If Mexico wants it, then Mexico can just try to fucking take it. I'll be waiting for them, along with millions of other service members and armed citizens.
60591
There is no easy answer to your question.  Bil Laden was trained by the CIA to fight off the Soviets when they invaded Afghanistan, so he is one tricky bastard.  Expect the unexpected.  Personally, I think its highly possible for him to his the US, the UK, a continental european city, and an asian city (think Tokyo) simultaneously, targeting financial centers (NYC, London, Paris, etc.)  \n\nPersonally, I think that he is wanting to come back to the USA, since he has not been able to touch us here since 9/11/01.  The only thing that will stop that is our security forces...if he is having logistical troubles hitting the US directly, he may well go after any nation that is participating on the war on terror.  If he chooses to go after a US Ally, think UK, as the English have been so supportive of the war on terror.\n\nOr, since he is a fanatic, he honestly could go anywhere that is not ruled by a strict Muslim government and call it a success, and keep the entire world a little paranoid....thats what a terrorist does.
728891
well as far as i know the biggest border in the world can be found between  USA and canadian  . there is several issues currently with that border :\n\nfirst the whole entire border has around 1000 immigration agents or a little bit more and from what i know both Canadians and Americans cross it as they like with out any restrictions . \n\nsecond there is curently many weapons being smugle into Canada from the US side which are making the lives of all canadians pretty hard , canada as far as i know has though laws regarding owning weapons but the constant contraband from the USA is making the situation pretty caotic for the autorities and all canadians .\n\nand third as we all know four terrorist already crossed from Canada into America and caused the most terrible thing America has ever live in its entire history . i think we should never forget that not matter how close America is to Canada , this should never be forgotten . i must add than this shoulld never be blamed on them but on us who did not pay enough attention and who did not care about bin laden as much as we shoulda care .
849587
The US could invade anyone it wants to, including Mexico or up here in Canada. the question is: why would they?
487681
No need to conquer them.  Just ask them if they'd like us to annex them.  Put it up for vote in a Mexican election (We should allow Mexicans here to vote in it too).  America is great.  They know it, we know it, why not expand?
666256
All we need are national guard on the boarder till more boarder agents are employed. However the only people that can put them there are the Govenors of each state or Bush. Call your Govenors and tell them what you think of this.\n\nI don't give a damn how poor Mexico is, It is not our problem. Mexico is getting bashes because they have been the most vocal and militant on the issue. And because they are swarming our boarders at over 8,000 per day. Most other countries are now using that boarder as well. 8 chinese were caught a week back. Our northern boarders are not as wide open. All illegal aliens need to go home.\n\n The definition of domestic terrorism from the US Code \nUS Code 802, Section 2331 Read sction 5 \nhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002331----000-.html \n\n\nTITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2331 Prev | Next \n\n§ 2331. Definitions \n\n\nRelease date: 2005-08-03 \n\nAs used in this chapter \n(1) the term international terrorism means activities that \n(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State; \n(B) appear to be intended \n(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; \n(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or \n(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and \n(C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum; \n(2) the term national of the United States has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act; \n(3) the term person means any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property; \n(4) the term act of war means any act occurring in the course of \n(A) declared war; \n(B) armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or \n(C) armed conflict between military forces of any origin; and \n\nTHIS SECTION \n\n(5) the term domestic terrorism means activities that \n(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; \n(B) appear to be intended \n(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; \n(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or \n(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and \n(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.\n \nhttp://www.alipac.us/
181004
just fly to mexico and cross the border ;)
909288
It is most likely that Osama Bin Laden is hiding in a village in Northern Pakistan. Since invading Pakistan with United States forces would be considered an act of war it is unlikely that we would go there to get him. He is being protected by the local Islamic War Lords and the area is very remote and very difficult to approach without alerting a listening post along the way. Pervez  Musharraf, the President of Pakistan rules a very fragile government and is unlikely to mount a major military operation to capture Osama Bin Laden since Pakistan in a Muslim State. Osama Bin Laden will probably die of old age while living in the Mountains of Northern Pakistan.
1045997
america is surely "looking" for bin laden, but even if we do get him, he probably will not die. the u.s. needs people like him to cause trouble so it gives us a reason to place troops in different areas. in a perfect world, the u.s. would keep their noses out of other nations' business. the majority of the terrorism that we suffer from basically started when we recognized israel as a country. it also doesn't help that we are predominately christian and they are muslims either.
315826
This is very simple. President Bush need some body like Osama to be alive and hiding to get a cause to attack any country.