What is the relationship between Lucifer and Seth?
538763
Lucifer (light bringer) is almost a direct ripoff of the Titan Prometheus from Greco-Roman mythology. Prometheus created humans in an idle moment, and really pissed off the gods by giving them fire (knowledge) and got "cast down" (chained to a rock with an eagle nibbling his liver) for his naughtiness. Only major difference is they removed the creation myth tie in.\n\nRemind you of any stories involving a garden and an apple?\n\nWake up folks, even their book states that knowledge is the worst enemy christans ever had. Right in the beginning no less...
661266
No "Lucifer" is NOT even a name for Satan!\n\nIn fact, The word "Lucifer" in Isaiah 14:12 presents a minor problem to mainstream Christendom. It becomes a much larger problem to Bible literalists.\n\n"Lucifer makes his appearance in the fourteenth chapter of the Old Testament book of Isaiah, at the twelfth verse, and nowhere else: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!" \n\nThe first problem is that Lucifer is a Latin name. So how did it find its way into a Hebrew manuscript, written before there was a Roman language? Was Satan given in this chapter of Isaiah, which describes the angel who fell to become the ruler of hell? \n\nConsidering the original Hebrew text, the fourteenth chapter of Isaiah is not about a fallen angel, but about a fallen Babylonian king, who during his lifetime had persecuted the children of Israel. It contains no mention of Satan, either by name or reference. The Hebrew scholar could only speculate that some early "Christian" (Christendom) scribes, writing in the Latin tongue used by the Church, had decided for themselves that they wanted the story to be about a fallen angel, a creature not even mentioned in the original Hebrew text, and to whom they gave the name "Lucifer." \n\nWhy Lucifer? In Roman astronomy, Lucifer was the name given to the morning star (the star we now know by another Roman name, Venus). The morning star appears in the heavens just before dawn, heralding the rising sun. The name derives from the Latin term lucem ferre, bringer, or bearer, of light." In the Hebrew text the expression used to describe the Babylonian king before his death is Helal, son of Shahar, which can best be translated as "Day star, son of the Dawn." The name evokes the golden glitter of a proud king's dress and court (much as his personal splendor earned for King Louis XIV of France the appellation, "The Sun King"). \n\nThe scholars authorized by ... King James I to translate the Bible into current English did not use the original Hebrew texts, but used versions translated ... largely by St. Jerome in the fourth century. Jerome had mistranslated the Hebraic metaphor, "Day star, son of the Dawn," as "Lucifer," and over the centuries a metamorphosis took place. Lucifer the morning star became a disobedient angel, cast out of heaven to rule eternally in hell. Theologians, writers, and poets interwove the myth with the doctrine of the Fall, and in Christian tradition Lucifer is now the same as Satan, the Devil, and --- ironically --- the Prince of Darkness. \n\nSo "Lucifer" is nothing more than an ancient Latin name for the morning star, the bringer of light. That can be confusing for many in Christendom who identify Christ himself as the morning star, a term used as a central theme in many of Christendom's sermons. Jesus refers to himself as the morning star in Revelation 22:16: "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." \n\nHenry Neufeld (a Christian who comments on Biblical sticky issues) went on to say, \n"this passage is often related to Satan, and a similar thought is expressed in Luke 10:18 by Jesus, that was not its first meaning. It's primary meaning is given in Isaiah 14:4 which says that when Israel is restored they will "take up this taunt against the king of Babylon . . ." Verse 12 is a part of this taunt song. This passage refers first to the fall of that earthly king... \n\nHow does the confusion in translating this verse arise? The Hebrew of this passage reads: "heleyl, ben shachar" which can be literally translated "shining one, son of dawn." This phrase means, again literally, the planet Venus when it appears as a morning star. I
920362
There are Seraphim and Cherubiem. Lucifer (Satan) was one of the Cherubim. The guardian angels are probably cherubim also.
902673
My mom told me that Lucifer was the only arch angel that God shared his wisdom with. And the result of it caused Lucifer to believe he was better and more wise than God, So God challenged him and sent him to the underworld. \nThat is why we were not allowed to eat the apple from the tree of knowlesdge, also why Lucifer tempted us with it. \nSometimes we think that we know more than God, and that is a result of the apple and the tree of knowledge.
717103
I could never figure out how Cain found his wife.  When I read it he was the only one left after he killed Abel, not counting Adam and Eve.   Seth was born later, so then there would have been Adam and Eve, Cain and little brother Seth, and, of course, dead Abel. So where in hell did Cain find his wife...??\n\nI've been stressing out on this for years.
414692
Lucifer did not cause Eve to eat the fruit.  She chose to eat the fruit herself.  Satan lied to Eve and misquoted what God had told Adam and Eve about eating the fruit.  She just blamed it on the serpent (Satan).  Then Adam blamed Eve (the woman Thou gavest me Lord).  Not one took credit for the action that they had just done.  Many scholars believe that Adam loved Eve so much he ate of the fruit so that he wouldn't be without her.  \n\nIf you read the passages in context, you will see that Satan misquoted what God had told Adam and Eve about the fruit.
1082243
I don't believe in this stuff, but here's some thoughts:\n\nGenerally, God should forgive Satan if he is a loving God.  \n\nSince God is omniscent, when he created Lucifer, he knew that Lucifer would rebel and fall (basically, he was created to do so).  Did God create Lucifer for this purpose?  Is it possible for Lucifer to repent, or did God "design" Lucifer to not be able to ask for forgiveness?  Do the same rules apply to angels as humans (who can ask for forgiveness)?  Has Lucifer repented?
468962
*Lucifer* will give His power and His throne- to the one who pleases Him the most  \n\nHe will give the Anointed one great authority-
515500
No, they were brothers, but not twins. And if memory serves, there was another brother... Seth?
239150
Does it matter? Only the descendants of Seth survived the flood.\nBut to answer your question - He married one of his many unnamed sisters. - The Bible says that he had children in Nod - the Bible does NOT say that he met his wife there.\nThe Bible clearly states that Eve (Cain's mother) is the mother of ALL living, and that Adam and Eve had many children (unnamed sons and daughters) over a period of 800 years (Adam lived for 930 years).
617215
Lucifer was the Anointed Cherub. Anointed means to be set apart for Gods Divine purpose. It also means "bestowal of Gods divine favor", and "appointment to a special place or function."\n\nGod had given Satan a certain amount of power and authority. But he perverted that power. Lucifer wanted to exalt himself above God... rather than "just" being the Angel of God.
42654
Starting to have?  Please!  When have they ever?  I've been in the tv industry and believe me, there is a plan to steal your hearts and minds.  The plan is this.  To make you think good things are bad and bad things are good.  See, Lucifer wants to make us self-destruct.  It is the only way He can strike back at God.  And we fall for it.  We accept things now that would have appalled our parents and grandparents.  We are dead emotionally and spiritually.  There is only one hope.
701704
Yes.  Heavenly Father, God, is the Father of all of our Spirits.  Christ is our Eldest Brother in that regard.  Lucifer was also one of God's early spirits, that is why he is called the Son of the Morning.  When God presented His plan for His children, to send us to earth to gain mortal bodies and to learn by our experience to choose the good from the evil, He asked for someone to be the designated Savior in His Plan of Salvation.  Jesus responded that He would go and do as the Father had planned.  Lucifer said that he would go and be sure that all of God's children returned, that not one of us would be lost.  This would remove our agency from the equation and Lucifer was rejected.  He being a proud spirit, did not accept God's rejection and rebelled against God, taking 1/3 of God's children with him.  They became Satan and his evil spirits to provide the opposition here on earth that we are learning to choose against. \nSo the short answer is yes, Satan, Lucifer, is not only Christ's brother, but he is our brother as well, as is Christ.
654725
He was not,but he was under the Lucifers influence ..i believe.
459420
No amount of me telling you what is and what not ain't gonna convince you,The fact that u r asking this question is because deep down you know u r wrong,The christian God as u put it, and satan r not equal and whomever came up with the idea you being taught against the bible with the bible is really cunning must be the devil himself,Let me tell you what my God give me that no demon in hell can give you peace.God treated lucifer unjust r u kidding me? God could have killed him he should have, but look around you all the wickedness thats happening the Devil is very well in charge.Do you know your lucifer talk to God see in Job when God said to him have u considered my son Job he said To God do u think job serve u for nothing meaning the omly reason y job serve God is because he was rich God said to him take all he has Job stayed true to God anyways your devil is gonna burn in hell along with anyone who serve him, you can prove God for yourself just talk to him.Say if u r really up there do something to let me know u r real
918332
Of course, but Satan is not necessarily a bodily being, rather can incarnate if he were to so choose.  Satan is a concept more than a corporeal being, and basically means the Accuser or the Deceiver.  It is my understanding, from theological studies, that Satan is subordinate to Lucifer, or at most reflections of Lucifer.  Others believe that Satan and Lucifer are the same.\n\nI'll skip the part about the Babylonian Captivity and the Demiurge of Yezidism.  Although that is quite fascinating, it took me months of study to understand the role of the Demiurge, Shai'tan.\n\nIt is believed that the purpose of Satan is to test humanity, and to create spiritual entropy within an individual or group.\n\nimacatholic2 could best explain the Roman Catholic Church's position.
957553
Hello,\n\nI will tell what is really going on there.\n\nOkay, and this is for real, Aliens, as many Americans know them to be called (but they are really Sons of God, Fallen Angels or Nephilim) have been coming to Earth since the beginning of time. Well, when Lucifer rejected God and Lucifer and 1/3 of his angles fell to Earth.\n\nHave you noticed how there is more and more "Alien" activity lately? This is of no coincidence. Lucifer knows his time on Earth is short and he and his fallen angels have a limited time to deceive and destroy God's people.\n\nHave you ever read anything on Fallen Angels or the Nephilim? Here are some websites on who and what they are.\n\nSo, to answer your question, our government has been in cahoots, yes cahoots, with the Fallen Angels since the 1940's and maybe before that time.\n\nHere is a website that shows all the American Presidents who have known about UFOs.\n\nHope this information helps you...............................  :-)