If Sudam Hussein exiled to Cuba, and Fidel Castro went into Kuwait, would Iran Nuke Iraq?  Are we having fun?
547640
First of all, Bush started this because he had to finish Big Daddy's mess up. Sudam would have to go back to Iraq as he is the only one who could repair Bushlers screw up. Fidel is too chicken to go to Kuwait , see that is why he was always sending all the criminals over here . If Iran nukes Iraq it will have to be when they are able to figure out that the reason they are so hostile is because of the oil mongers of the world. They just want us to stay the hell outta their land. Yea, I am having fun , reading all the people call each other infantile and cruel names.
210408
YES; Iraq/Iran have caused more trouble for the Middle-East than anyone in the Muslem World. And the Iranians are'nt Arab, they're Asiatic Islam's.
790525
No, absolutely not.  This would send the entire middle east into war.  Iran would invade along with Syria.  We must stay until the Iraqi's can defend themselves.  A gradual reduction of troops over a three year period should do the trick.  I am a White, Catholic, Male, Italian.
844729
We tried that before with Iran under the Clinton administration. It didn't work. We need to let the world handle this. If the dictators of N.K. and Iran won't comply, it will be up to the world to take them out.
471153
I think Iran is far harder nut to crack than Iraq and it would be biggest Bush's stupidity if he try to attack the country at least now. Besides, Iran can't for now threaten anybody with its uranium-enriching level.
1119302
Consider this. NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION WAS FOUND.\n\nWhy  woud a leader of his country tell his neighborhing enemies that he has NO WEAPONS AT ALL!!!!\n\nOf course your going to lie!!! to PROTECT YOUR PEOPLE!!!!\n\nAnd if Sadams crimes were so vulgar why dont the Iranians release him to the USA? They wont cause THEY DONT EVEN LIKE THE USA GOVERNMETN INVOLVED TOO MUCH\n\nIf you want the Iraqies to suffer like we americans do, give them Celion Dion and Britney spears!!!!\n\nThey'll think twice about being americanized
309545
WE won't attack Iran,we might bomb your enrichment facilities.Iran is maneuvering its self into a position that most of the world will not allow.Yes you have oil,But larger more powerful countries who could take it have instead either not bought from you or have bought from you.\nBut the world is hungry for that oil,can Iran really afford to go around slapping faces of larger nations?
344352
Lol.. Attack Israel like they did with Iraq and doing with Iran and increase their oil business.
619813
What's the relevance of all that ranting?  It's not an argument that the world would be safer if Iran had nukes.  I've no idea if the president of Iran is a "real Muslim" or not; he simply talks like a maniac.  The question of the USA's 100 year war record isn't directly relevant to the question of whether it would be good for the world if Iran had nukes, but as it happens, the USA tends to respond to attacks upon it, or upon other countries.
949016
I sympathize with your country's situation. But you have to understand that you have been taken control under a theocracy that is ruled by an anti-semitic radical muslim. We can't trust Iran's word to say that they will only use it for nuclear power giving the history of disagreement with Israel. Ahmanidejad has said he will blow up Israel and he doens't believe the Holocaust ever happened. The Iran-Iraq war was horrible and innocent lives were lost. The U.S. at that time did help Saddam because we viewed Iran as a bigger threat. I apologize on my country's behalf. But we were nervous of a potential Middle East crisis and we tried to salvage it. It's because of this history that we can't trust Ahmanidejad because we can't run the risk of him blowing up Israel or take over a weak Iraq. If this occurs, it will expand the war in the Middle East and possibly create a WWIII which will hurt everybody. This is why we don't support nuclear development in Iran. If you can guarantee us that Iran won't blow up Israel then who knows? Until then, try to see this from our point of view.
927376
Back, when Jimmy Carter was President, Irananians, who overthrew the Shah,  took our embassy staff hostage.  That is because the Shah was a cruel dictator and the U. S. had kept him propped up for a long time.\n\nSome time later, Sadam decided to go to war with Iran.  Now Iraq was our friend.  The U. S. government supplied Sadam with all manner of potions with which to torment the Iranians, because we didn't like the Iranians because they overthrew our Shah, and held our embassy staff prisoner for a long time.\n\nNow, when Sadam stopped behaving, we knew what we had given him and had every reason to expect to find it there, maybe even new and improved.  After all, a lot of his scientists were educated in major universities right here in the U. S.  Besides which, we had a devil of a time trying to fight the war in Afghanistan.  We needed space for some bases in the middle east, and then, there was that oil....so, what excuse could we come up with???   Oh! Oh! I got it...remember that anthrax we gave him?\n\nUnfortunately, by the time we got there, the cupboard was bare and noone knows what happened to it.  Most folks say Syria.  I wouldn't doubt it.
104159
No. The UN would not authorise such an action, not that Iran is facing any action fron the UN at the moment anyway. Also, the fallout would affect neighbouring countries. And it may help unite Arab countries against the West.\n\nGiven that Iran is a country surrounded by enemies, they may have some justification for their actions. Somewhat the same justification as Israel.
169098
partly, yes. Cuba, as you know is a commie country who hates America (or at least Fidel Castro does). I think bush is too paranoid...
906493
Unfortunately, Iraq will be united with Iran. Shiites are the majority in Iraq. If there is a democratic government elected by the majority, it will be Shiite. Shiites run Iran. Iran is a shiite nation. No bashing, but Bush has created an impossible situation. Bush is right about Iran being the axis of evil. So what the hell do we do now? Please. We must not ask Iran for help in Iraq. Oh, by the way, in Democracy, you do not kill the people who disagree with you. The so called Iraq government is a puppet regime.
611866
It is doubtful with the lunatic they have as a president. I think before the diplomatic procedures can be played out, he is going to either strike Israel, or give cause to have the Israeli's take a preemptive strike due to his continued threats towards Israel. If Iran manages to get nukes, the entire world, but primarily the US and Israel will be in real danger. Any move toward diplomacy is a smoke screen, and is just meant to buy more time. They learned from the UN/Iraq debacle, and he probably has no intention of keeping these nukes in Iran. He will ship them abroad in an attempt to get them over here to America and Israel.
324082
Yes. Bush Sr asked that troops be sent over there to remove the Iraqi occupation from Kuwait, not to remove the Iraqi leader. Once the Iraqi Army was removed and Kuwait was returned to normal, our job was complete. He did what he asked the troops for and got out.
106571
Good god NO. If we attack Iran Syria will invade Iraq and our troops there will be flanked from the east and the west, not to mention what other Arab countries would jump in. Our troops in Iraq would get slaughtered.