how many interrogatories are allowed in AZ?
541500
I have never heard of a limit on the number of questions you can be asked in legal forms. As far as I know, unless your attorney can declare the questions as irrelevant, they can ask as many as they want. Good luck.
501224
The most well known is the Miranda VS Arizona. Miranda was read his rights and requested a Lawyer to be present when questioned. Since he was considered to be in "Custodial Interrogation" the police got a confession from him after he requested a lawyer and the court of appeals suppressed his confession. (Laws of Self Incrimination 5th Amendment)\nJohn \nCriminal Justice Student
148877
He's asking about California.  \n\nThe question is nonsense, however.  Section 1538.5 of the Penal Code is the statutory mechanism that allows unlawfully obtained evidence to be suppressed (kept out of court).  A 1538.5 hearing is held at the request of the defendant to determine if the government followed "the rules" when it obtained evidence to be used against a defendant in a criminal case.\n\nFor example, if a defendant is charged with possession of drugs based on a search of his person, the defense may file a 1538.5 motion to challenge the search.  The defendant may take the position that the search was unlawful and ask the Court to exclude the evidence obtained as a result of the unlawful search.  \n\nIn Danny's case, a 1538.5 motion might be filed to contest the legality of the checkpoint, the observations of his sobriety made by the officer who initially detained him, the observations made by the officer who evaluated him and ultimately arrested him, and/or the function of the breath machine or other chemical testing procedure.  There might even be more issues, but those are the significant ones.\n\nSo while the question really doesn't make sense, it at least shows the poster has an idea of what's going on.  A 1538.5 hearing is used to determine if the government did the things it's allowed to do by law and didn't violate anyone's constitutional rights.\n\nDanny - see my other answer to your first question.  I applaud your interest in safeguarding your rights.  However, if you acknowledge (even if only to yourself) that you were driving in violation of the laws in California concerning DUI (driving a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level of .08% or higher) then I'm left feeling like you need to accept that you potentially could have killed someone (or yourself) that night, and take your lumps.  If you think you can get off on a technicality, go for it if you want.  But really...you know if you were guilty or not, no matter what the legal beagles end up saying, and if you should be punished for making a bad decision, then take it and move on.  I know it's expensive and I know it has a *profound* impact on your life...but the impact you might have had on other lives that night makes your concerns look childish.\n\nEDIT 2/12/06: James F...I know, but that does not stop defendants from filing supppression motions against them.
187009
Might be 22 states.\nhttp://www.utazas.com/utazas/forum/forum.cgi/?action=cikkek&uticel=2&file=1106101335\n\n"States that don't have lawful presence requirements (22): \n\nAK, HI, IL, MA, MI, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NM, NY, NC, ND, OR, RI, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, and WI.\n\n..."
202681
Here's the basics:\n\nMiranda v. AZ holds that when a suspect is questioned in custody by the police, his confession will be admissible against him only if he has received the "Miranda" Warnings.\n\nBefore Miranda will be found to apply, three requirements must be satisfied:\n1. Miranda warnings are necessary only where the suspect is taken into custody.\n2. Miranda only applies where the confession comes as a result of questioning.\n3. Finally, Miranda applies only where both the questions and the custody are by the police or other law enforcement authorities.
1147807
as I said before-Warrants are not public information in AZ. There probably are not in your area. If the person is over 18-you have no right to the information concerning another person  anyway.
753476
The rules vary in every state, so it is hard to give you a definite answer but if you visit the appropriate state forum at http://www.prisontalk.com someone will be able to tell you exactly what the rules are and how to get this done.\nGood luck
438980
Previous answerer should have read further.\nhttp://supreme.state.az.us/selfserv/PO_Forms/GeneralPet.pdf
1030694
Arizona Statutes of limitations\n\nAny capital offense: No Limit. \nContracts:\n 6 years. \n\n4 years if contract was executed outside of state.\n \nCounterfeiting(felony)\n no limit\n \nDrug trafficking no limit \nFiduciary duty breach 2 years \nForgery (felony) no limit \nFraud (common law): 3 years \nFraud in purchase or sale: 2 years from time of discovery.\n \nInjury to personal property: 2 years \nIntentional Torts: 2 years \nLibel / Slander / Defamation:\n 1 years \nMedical Malpractice Actions:\n 2 years within discovery.\n \nNegligent Misrepresentation: 2 years after discovery,  or reasonably should have been discoverd. \nOral Contract breach: 3 years \nPersonal Injury Actions: 2 years from the date of injury. \nProducts Liability Actions: 2 years within discovery.\n \nRape: No limit. \nRules for Minors: Limitation period begins to run on the minors 18th birthday, except in cases of wrongful death.\n \nSexual abuse of a minor No limit \nWrongful Death: 2 years
786935
18% of Arizona prison inmates enter for DUI.  County jail will presumably be higher.
619248
1 count of assualt with intent per offender. first degree misemaender
777501
This is a question I would ask the attorney general' office.  They will open an investigation
319387
www.adc.state.az.us/ISearch.htm\n\ngood luck!!
1518
Arizona or New Mexico
703383
Any three. It is not a secret, and with the second conviction the judge gives a long lecture about what a third will mean.\n\nAnybody in that position who commits  (or rather gets caught) a third time is probably too stupid to be walking around loose.
684190
pre sentence investigation
235160
It doesn't seem to have a specific website, but the phoenix law department is http://www.ci.phoenix.az.us/LAW/index.html and the jail listing is http://www.mcso.org/submenu.asp?file=jailfacilities