I am a writing a paper agaisnt diplomat immunity. I need facts to support my arguement.?
552054
check out these sites:\n\nhttp://www.state.gov/m/ds/immunities/c9127.htm\n\nhttp://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/1985\n\nhttp://www.fedstats.gov/
545726
http://www.aip.com.au/industry/fact_refine.htm\n\nOthers with a web search
287847
Before you write your paper, make sure that you have the facts.\n\nThe press sells papers by exaggerating the issues. Guantanamo was an excellent example.  While the inmates were humiliated, they weren't tortured.  The accusations still spring up, however, and the UN is using the accusation to bash the US.\n\nAdditionally, the UN has determined that force feeding prisoners that go on a hunger strike is torture.  So, if you feed them, it's torture.  If you don't and they starve, it's torture.\n\nFinally, prisoners will lie about treatment because it's a form of political power they can use while incarcerated.
131432
No hope. You have very little chance to win the case.\nInstead, try the media; newspaper, tv, mags, etc. Give them the infos you have, evidences, anything they can use to tell the internationals what wrong doings gov has done.\nPS: Just local media won't do any good. I suggest international or foreign media.
802957
Here's a great article that should give you all the facts you need to know.  Good luck on your report.
194093
Hire an attorney if u r not enter just go to the embassy and clear them all write a note to INS and fight your case i think u can win  do it
197571
Speak to them in private. A person in charge doesn't appreciate being undermined in front of the people they're in charge of (unless, of course, you want to undermine them!:). Be very polite, but firm, and back your reasons. The traditional argument paper form could help here:\n\n1. State problem/solution\n2. Reasoning for solution/Reasoning for it being a problem\n3. Counter any responses you may expect/Interpret why the current solution is being used, but say why that's wrong\n4. Sum up\n\nOf course, a conversation is different than a paper. . .
522278
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/hague01.htm
167385
From the source link:\n\n============================================================\nArgumentative Thesis Statements\nIn an argumentative paper, you are making a claim about a topic and justifying this claim with reasons and evidence. This claim could be an opinion, a policy proposal, an evaluation, a cause-and-effect statement, or an interpretation. However, this claim must be a statement that people could possibly disagree with, because the goal of your paper is to convince your audience that your claim is true based on your presentation of your reasons and evidence. An argumentative thesis statement will tell your audience:\n\nyour claim or assertion \nthe reasons/evidence that support this claim \nthe order in which you will be presenting your reasons and evidence \nExample: Barn owls' nests should not be eliminated from barns because barn owls help farmers by eliminating insect and rodent pests. \n\nA reader who encountered this thesis would expect to be presented with an argument and evidence that farmers should not get rid of barn owls when they find them nesting in their barns. \n\nQuestions to ask yourself when writing an argumentative thesis statement:\n\nWhat is my claim or assertion? \nWhat are the reasons I have to support my claim or assertion? \nIn what order should I present my reasons? \n============================================================\n\nIn short, take a stand on an issue, then support your stance.
810011
Argue away!  You are right - it should be wiln't or willn't.  Not really sure how you go about arguing your point with them, though, but I'm sure they have a web site and a contact link.  Good luck!
582831
Write State Department.
402445
I am not sure of the lie.. but if you have proof you didn't say it let people know.  And depending on the lie.. you have a right to say whatever you want.  Constitution says so.
1173439
The same facts can have different weight depending on what the point of your argument is.  for example:\n-For those who believe the invasion of Iraq was wrong the recent discovery of old chemical rounds is insignificant and more like a "lucky accident" for the administration than proof that they were telling the truth about WMD's.\n-To people such as myself who believed that saddam was evil and needed to go, any evidence that satisfies the requisite justification (in this case that he had WMD's) was good enough.\n\nI'm not stating my reasons for taking the above position here as that was not the question asked.
705954
WE CAN DEBATE IT ON YAHOO ANSWER.  YOU WRITE 5 QUESTION AND GET ALL ANSWER AND REST WILL DO THE SAME AND ANSWERED BY ALL YAHOO MEMBERS
784186
Option 1: take a controversial topic and defend one side. (like abortion, immigration, national security, homosexuality, etc.)\n\nOption 2: take a ridiculous topic and defend one side (like "the sky is purple" "people should eat elephants" "convicts should eat each other" "Canada should annex Zimbabwe" etc"\n\nOption 3: take a mediocre topic and talk about it (like "people are good" "I should have an A on this presentation" etc.)
859238
refer \nhttp://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/5610
328897
this is my humble understanding,Ok, what I understand from the Relevancy; collateral matters. there must be an evidence such a relativity to the fact in issue as to persuade belief in its being or absence. Evidence on collateral matters shall not be permissible, except for when it tends to be any reasonable degree to establish the probability or improbability of the fact in issue.