why is that sis chipset are not used in corporate offices?
539911
That's because most corps don't purchase motherboards, they purchase systems.  Therefore, which chipset that ends up getting used is entirely dependant on which one the OEM that they (the corps) are purchasing from use.  So most Dell's for instance will use the Intel chipsets, so any corp that uses Dell's will use Intel chipsets.  This isn't a conspiracy or a concious descision by corps, they really don't care (actually most don't even know).
531711
It is a custom chip that is not sold as a discrete component. As such the manufacturer does not need to release the pinouts, nor do they want to it seems.
65176
It's a very small number. In looking at their website of the 100,000+ installs they claim only 1050 were for public sector clients WORLDWIDE.
717116
Or just find a COTS solution, since such systems are already in use.\n\nIs there a question in here, such as what technology platforms might be appropriate?
984607
Speed and type of RAM used is dependent on the chipset used to make the mainboard. \n\nIn your case, the answer is "no way". DDR2 didn't exist back then except in a lab.
402270
because the manufacturing process is expensive, and wasn't too much of a demand for them. at first, they were somewhat promising because the system bus needed larger bandwidth for the new P4 processors. so Intel and Rambus teamed up, but the Caminogate case (i820's faulty memory translator - anyone remember ?) and the advent of DDR SDRAM (high density and relatively cheap) practically killed Rambus technology. (it had 16 bit data bus, but very high clock for that time)
907566
sad to say, but you have essentially shot yourself in the foot by buying a Mac if you are the only Mac user on your work's business network ... check with the system administrator, since he is providing the Mac support, he should know how to resolve your issue.  ... Buying a system that handicaps you at work is one quick way of making yourself expendable, not recommended and it wont endear you to anyone that has to share files with you or support your O/S when everyone else is using PC's
904106
I don't know . I am not working in ISRO . Is any one of you working in it ? Then you are the one to answer this question
115950
so we don't have to carry around big old a-team phones\ngo to apple .com and check out the Mac Mini\nyou don't have to be a fan to see that the board must be smaller.\nisnt the motherboard a bunch of ICs and if they are smaller...\nBetter yet what if you could cram the entire motherboard and connections on a single silicon wafer instead of having a cctboard\nWhat if You could have a voice dialed pen size cellphone?\n•also power requirements are lower for nanoscale\n•and as for engineering–because there is money in it\nNASA pays $10000.00/453g to put stuff in low-earth orbit\nand perhaps $100000.00/453g to put stuff out at Mars\nNanoscale might mean a lot here.
817710
SCSI is an older technology it was a way to connect devices to your computer with a faster transfer rate the what the ports on the computer had. Now with USB and firewire we don't need SCSI anymore
859203
most manufacturers make a variety of interfaces for the same card, which is why some sites have a pcie version of the 6200, others will have the agp version, some the pci version etc etc.  Assuming theres only ONE kind of interface for a card is very unrealistic.\n\nAs for pci vid cards not being manufactured anymore?  Come on, it will always be a necessity.  Just because they are not in demand nearly as much as they were in the past, all OEMs like HP, Dell, Gateway, Emachines etc are STILL making systems that dont have an agp or pciE slot and rely on onboard video, thus halting production of PCI cards altogether is not realistic, would lead to total loss of an entire sector of the PC market, and is just not true.  \n\nhttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814161050\n\nPCI x1300.  While not as powerful as an x1900 or nvidia 7900 (for obvious limitations on the pci bus that would not be able to handle the throughput of a higher clocked model like the x1900), its still a current PCI vid card.\n\nhttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814139010\n\nGee that looks like a PCI version of the 6200 to me...as well as anyone with eyes that has the ability to read.\n\nPlease don't be so quick to be so elitist and snuff your nose at older technology. Many of us prefer to build our own machines but you are forgeting that the large majority of consumers are still buying systems we would consider "chump" from HP, Dell etc. and though PCI may be dead when it comes to graphics for the computer elite/power users, its still a reality and necessity for many more.  Hell, I even still use dos when I walk into a lot of the restaurant/hoel clientelle I deal with.  A few are still even running win95 heh
465445
Pentium M is for Mobile gadgets, it's intended for laptops notebooks, etc. Never use it for a desktop computer. Or if you want to make a light traffic print server, Celeron would make a nicer deal, M is way too powerful and way too expensive for things like that.
763363
You want Systray, but I have never heard about others. None of them are running in my computer and its working alright.
906591
Neither Intel nor any manufacturer I am aware of still makes MB with more than 1 serial port, and many have none.\n\nOnly solution in "new" production is to add a serial port plug in card.
1079760
Please clarify your question.  An information system could be a single computer, or a large network of computers, organized to perform certain operations.  What is it that you wish to implement?\n\nModern processor chips contain many millions of transistors.  It is not practical to implement them with individual components.\n\nDiscrete implementation of the circuitry found on a modern motherboard, for example, would be much more expensive than the cost of a commercially available motherboard.\n\nIt may be feasible to obtain designs for certain historic systems and implement them with more modern components, but performance will not compare with current technology and the costs may be prohibitive.\n\nSee the link to "Vintage Computers", which has notes on 1960's era machines.
1122918
it s only possible in workgroup if The printer itself has inbuilt functions with the driver provided. Otherwise not possible in workgroup.
14669
it will never come out, coz Apple is now underway transiting from choosing PowerPC (G3, G4, G5) as cpus for the new macs to Intel. also, "G5 mobile" is a kinda "non-existent" coz IBM/Freescale has no intention from day 1 in releasing G5 mobile according to recent reports.\n\nthe first Intel based mac will be released by June 2006 according to Steve jobs in his earlier keynote speech, CEO of Apple.