What was going on in Romania in 1977?
540560
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania#History\n\nwhatever u want to know is here.\ngood luck!
203287
traian băsescu (born november 4, 1951) is a romanian politician. he is the current president of romania, inaugurated on december 20, 2004. he won the office in the 2004 presidential election.\n\nprior to becoming president, he was the mayor of bucharest from june 2000 until december 2004.
218282
in 1977 it was 30,173.
5698
Oh yes! It's a country in Eastern Europe, capital Bucharest.
117144
Probably no one has answered this aquestion because the state of the lives of many of the children or Romania is quite desperate.  \n\nI realize your class is a preschool class, but the reality of many children in Romania is that they don't get to do much for fun .. they do stuff to survive.\nCheck out these websites.
543643
Mihail Traistaru from Romania
765989
I suspect you are referring to Nicolae Ceausescu, in Romania.  He was executed following the overthrow of his despotic regime.  Here are a few sites specifically related to orphanages in Romania and their legacy of despair:\n\nhttp://www.catholicexchange.com/vm/index.asp?art_id=11699\n\nhttp://web.psych.ualberta.ca/~ecornell/p423/Notes2/RomanianOrphans.html\n\nhttp://www.noroc.org/romania.html
644956
On November 9, 1989 the Berlin Wall fell\n\nOctober 3, 1990 the country was reunited
326433
it is a city in romania, click on the link given below......
1008160
Of course!  But I don't speak Romanian.  I had a wonderful holiday there years ago - saw Bran Castle, toured through the mountains and forests where, I hear, there are still bears; stayed the night in Tirgu Mures, Brasov and some other places.  It was very beautiful then - I hope it hasn't been spoiled by commercialism now?
229441
In the early 90's after the former Soviet union collapsed
1080792
It happened to the Soviet Union.  Don't be complacent...anything can happen.
992220
Romania (Romanian: România /ro.mɨ'ni.a/) is a country in Southeastern Europe. It is bordered by Hungary and Serbia in the west and Bulgaria to the south along the Danube River, Ukraine and Moldova in the northeast. Romania has also a stretch of sea coast on the Black Sea and the eastern and southern Carpathian mountains run through its centre. Historic Bucharest (Romanian: Bucureşti /bu.ku'reʃtʲ/), a major tourist attraction, is its capital and largest city. Romania has been an active member of NATO since 2004, and is also an acceding country to the European Union. The EU Accession Treaty was signed in early 2005, and Romania is due to join the European Union on January 1, 2007. Starting from January 1, 2007, Romania will be the seventh largest EU nation.
1062189
he was the president of Romania until 1989.He was the er of the communist in Romania.He's not a very lovable character
471379
da ma normal ca sunt si romani, din ce am vazut eu sunt mai multi.. scuze da nu m.am mai obosit sa scriu in engleza.. a chiar dinamo-steaua 2-0 asa un pronostic pt deseara.. dak esti stelist(a) asta e soarta :)
456299
Romania and Bulgaria are Axis satellites; Greece and Yugoslavia are members of the United Nations; Albania is occupied territory; and Turkey has been a fairly consistent nonbelligerent. Bulgaria was happy with German permission to occupy Yugoslavian and Greek Macedonia and Thrace. Obedient to its master’s voice, Romania did not complain out loud when Hitler ordered the cession of northern Transylvania to Hungary in 1940. But Romania has not forgotten this enforced loss of territory, and underneath the surface of common membership in the Axis, Romania, Hungary, and Bulgaria are seething with territorial jealousies and ambitions. Greece and Yugoslavia are also insistent that their seized provinces shall be restored to them.\n\nSuch trouble spots as Transylvania, Thrace, Macedonia, Northern Epirus, Kossovo, and the Banat may be just words to other people. But to the people of the Balkans they have been fighting words. Much had been done before the war, however, to make boundary disputes less dangerous to peace. Only one of the six Balkan states, Bulgaria, was still unreconciled, and even Bulgaria had undertaken not to try to modify its frontiers by force of arms.\n\nAdded to these disputes between the nations are the internal divisions between various groups within (or exiled from) each country. That between the Chetniks and the Partisans is only the most spectacular and most publicized conflict. In Greece and Albania as well, struggles are in progress between the popular, forces of resistance and liberation on the one hand, and the elements of reaction and collaboration on the other, although the latter are almost negligible. The real fight is rather between bands with conflicting ideas of patriotism. Some people think there are pro-Allied movements in Bulgaria and Romania too, awaiting the opportunity to throw out pro-Axis governments. In all the Balkan countries, as in the rest of Europe, there are seeds of civil strife.\n\nIn this pamphlet, much of the blame for past Balkan troubles has been freely placed on the great powers. But of course they are not solely responsible.\n\nUncritical nationalism is particularly strong in the Balkans. And it is just in the Balkans, a small area crowded with many different peoples, that unbridled nationalist rivalry is perhaps most dangerous. The great powers have been as much motivated by nationalism as the small ones—and perhaps will continue to be. But if it is questionable whether they can afford to prolong a system in which aggressive nationalism is curbed only by the force of opposing nationalism, it is certain that the Balkan countries cannot afford it.\n\nTo put it the other way around, if the great powers have had to “recognize the necessity of establishing ... a general international organization ... for the maintenance of ... peace and security,” in the words of the Moscow Declaration, the Balkan nations are still more obliged to seek for peaceful ways of settling conflicts through cooperation or else destroy themselves.\n\nIn the settlements after World War I it was clearly not possible to draw national boundaries in the Balkans according to the wishes of all the people. Unavoidably a great many people in the mixed populations had to be left on the “wrong” side of the line wherever it was drawn. To resolve this difficulty, population exchanges were suggested and tried as the easiest and most durable solution.\n\nIn one instance—between Greece and Turkey after 1923—that method proved, in its outcome, highly successful. It removed the cause of incessant quarreling between Turkey and Greece who have since become good friends instead of bitter enemies. In a second instance—between Greece and Bulgaria—it was also beginning to show good results.\n\nPopulation exchange might work as well in other instances and again in some it could not be applied. To uproot the half-million or so Albanians who live in the Kossovo region of Yugoslavia and dump them into an already pov
9513
i'm in europe, and i know where romania is. good luck with joining the EU