iv heard this new thing that noel edmonds does about "asking the cosmos"can any 1 tell me anythin about it?
548648
Cosmic Ordering is a phenomenom made famous recently by British TV presenter Noel Edmonds. It has become famous due to its straightforward appeal and its claims to grant your heart's desire.\n\nIn order to Cosmic Order and have your wishes granted you must write what you want on a piece of paper and the cosmos does the rest. Alternative methods involve shouting your wishes from an open window to the cosmos; in effect letting the world know.\n\nCosmic Ordering is based on a best-selling (in Germany) by Barbel Mohr about the power of positive thinking. Mohr, 41, who lives near Munich with her twins (she wished for them), is a former journalist.\n\nShe first outlined her thinking in articles in her magazine, Sonnenwind (Solar Wind), and they have since been made into books. Her best-known tome - the one that Edmonds was given by his reflexologist - is called Cosmic Ordering Service - A Guide to Realising Your Dreams. It has sold a million copies in Germany alone.\n\nThe concept of Cosmic Ordering is very close to some of the ideas expressed in Neil Donald Walsch's controversial book Conversations with God (various editions from 1995, including 1997 Hodder & Stoughton edition). Specifically, the concept that every human has an "inner voice" is common to both works.\n\nWalsh's work puts forward the idea that, in order for one to achieve or acquire something, all one has to do is to be thankful to God. That is, the correct prayer is one of thanks and not of request or supplication.\n\nMohr's work says, however, that "orders" should be placed with the "Cosmic Ordering Service", analogous to a metaphysical mail-order store, and that these requests will be fulfilled.
1136275
Swamp gas refracting the light off Venus?  Oh, wait, wait, wait, I got it!  Iran's nuclear program starting off with a bang!  No, no, that can't be it either.  I know!  A weather balloon from Roswell, New Mexico!  No?  How about the subject of SOHO's intense interest?  Yeah! That's gotta be it!  Whatever it is, I'm afraid to look directly at it!  Do I get the points?  Please?
929324
Is that the one with an avatar of an aliens head and recently stated that he had 6 personalities?\n\nI dont know if he or she is a real alien, but some of the questions are strange. Funny too, I have to admit. \n\nNo problem with a bit of fun on YA - if he/she is happy and not harming anyone then I say good luck to him / her / it.\n\nOh - I had better answer the question or else get a violation - I was caught like that the other day - \n\nYes, he is.\nErr, ummm, eeeehhhhh. Oh no, he's not. I think\n\nWonder which planet he is from. Bet its a long way from here. If he was an alien, I mean. Which he's not. Is he?
246282
I don't know why there are so many Cosmic Ridlles like Aether and Curvature of Time and even worse Space; Who does really understand it. And how can they play the fiddle in Space That is my Riddle!
746687
i don't know anything about this book or author.  it is bogus so forget it.\n\nthere is one star (sun), eight planets (mercury, venus, earth, mars, jupiter, uranus, and neptune), hundreds of dwarf, ball-shaped bodies ("1 ceres", "134340 pluto", and "136199 eris" for example), and tens of thousands small irregularly-shaped bodies in the solar system, and there is no hint of another star or any more planets.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrasolar_planet\nhttp://exoplanet.eu/catalog.php\n\nin 2006,  astronomers found evidence for a planet orbiting a star 21,500 ± 3,300 away.  the star is cataloged as OGLE-2005-BGL-390L.  the planet, OGLE-2005-BGL-390Lb, is 5.5 earth masses, but astronomers have also found more than 200 others.
97730
Seems to be a very interesting site - never heard of it before. Would take a long time to read the whole contents. Some of the things I read are certainly true... however, who is the author of this site? What is their message? Seems to me that it is rather a matter of believe than thinking whether it is true or not...\n\nHow would Mulder say: The truth is out there ;-)
1013634
You know if you click on his name and go to his profile  you can email him your question. Why do you post something like this for others to answer? Are they sitting on his shoulder? Do they know how he gets his information?  You really should just ask him directly. Jim_Darwin does a lot of research on religion. He reads a lot of books. This is one of the driving forces in his life. To get at what is real. To find the truth that works for him. To pick apart all the things that don't make sense. Are you saying that what he posted isn't in the bible? Did he make it up? Why does it bother you so much if it is true? He didn't write the bible, he is just showing what he has found and why he doesn't follow that book. Talk to him personally and I bet you get a whole new opinion on him as a real person not just some Y!A Religion/Spirituality character.\nLove & Light\nSharon\nOne Planet = One People
1011467
Actually I remember hearing on Brian Greene's (physicists), book on tape titled "Fabric of the Cosmos" where he stated that science is just now starting to learn what Astrologers and Occultists have always known, that changes in matter cause changes in matter somewhere else.
923831
im not sure but it sounds interesting,\nnever heard of it.
964468
http://www.earthportals.com/Portal_Messenger/greer.html\n\nFrom this site I can gather that while Steven is not a complete idiot (he has a doctorate in something), he is not in any position to be making such claims (his medical doctorate is in trauma medicine... not astronomy, not general biology, not evolution not even environmental science).\n\nAs I go on to read the page's statement he sounds to me like a kind of interstellar James Lovelock, who pioneered the "scientific" Gaia Hypothesis.  This is where it gets sticky for me... I do somewhat believe in the Gaia Hypothesis (more in its interconnectedness than its ability to heal).  Carl Sagan opposed Lovelock and his hypothesis, and he is my hero so I've always been a little torn on the subject.\n\nI don't think there can be a universal Gaia Hypothesis which seems to be what Dr. Greer is hinting at because life is not connected between planets.  Obviously.  When we die on Earth microbes on Mars don't eat our bodies.  Billions of years later some of the atoms that were once in us might bombard an atom that used to be in a rock on Mars but we don't seem to have much effect on it.\n\nI read on... granted this is new to me, but the conscious oneness... is he saying that we are consciously connected? If this is even possible for humans, which is certainly debatable, I'd think we would notice strange influences from aliens.  But I'm not sure what he is talking about.  And then he states a lot of the obvious.\n\nNow... it might just be me, but in my years I have noticed that bullshitters tend to fallow a particular pattern.  Vague claims with almost nonsensical big words and no examples are fallowed or mixed in with precise and obvious claims that have very little to do with what they are talking about.  Such as "Collective mineral deposites are the very essence of our planet and souls or some similar entity is bound to manifest itself in such a hospitible and common location.   After all we've all seen rocks.  And we've all felt the presence of souls.  Allow me to introduce Occam's Razor..."\nHe is fallowing that format.\n\n\nDear sweet god, someone put this man in a Public Speaking class.\n\nShitloads of stating the obvious mixed in with obscure associations.\n\nReading the core principals I see that this has a critical flaw for the scientific community, it is seperating itself from science... he will never be able to prove this using science.\n\n"Even physical matter has an aspect of its nature which is non-local, transcendent and conscious"... rocks are conscious?\nLight is transcendent... in that it can instantaneously affect other light without transcending space.\n\nIn the second point this assumes that animals also have spirits... all living things, even plants and bacteria.  Fine, I'll go along with that.\n\nAh, here is his out.  The non-biological spiritual beings in point three... any discrepancies with the physical world can be blamed on those.  Sadly he says that they can affect the physical and that poses a problem since the physical world is described by science.\n\nBy his fourth point everything is everywhere?\n\nHis fifth point draws in faith again.  But most religions currently assert that only God is everywhere and in everything.\n\nWell in short, he isn't putting forth his arguments very clearly or giving support... red flag.\nHe is an MD in an unrelated feild.\nHis theories use too many different ideas from different areas needing different kinds of proof.  Most of this can either never be proven or is likely to be disproven.\n\nThe point of this seems to be to open our eyes to all sorts of life.  This is a good thing but he is going about it the wrong way I think.  Sure it is likely that life comes in many different forms that will look completely new to us but the ones we can have interactions with will be physical.  Ghosts and dreams and telepathic communications have some physical
854993
There definitely is something... what it is I am not exactly sure but, it is much more than anyone here can ever know. I have read a lot on this..and somethings have me think...maybe there is a better life after we die.... I am skeptical on quite a few things. I do however believe this physic Sylvia Browne.. You should watch and listen to things she says.. it is amazing.. She appears on Montel every Wednesday. Is there a "GOD"? That is not so believable from where I sit but, again, that is not been proven to me as of yet. LL.
829511
I have seen those same NASA pictures with those tall things you spoke of blurred out. You have to wonder just what it is they are hiding. It may not necessarily be anything alien, but some secret government project going on up there. However, I do believe there could be alien/ET activity going on also. I have seen some unbelievable footage over the last several months. Some of it is quite scary and makes you wonder just what is really going on in the world. I am convinced that there is major government cover-up when it comes to this stuff.
477542
Dear episodes1979,\n\nI am neither fanatical nor ignorant, and, in fact, have done quite a bit of research on what we humans like to call "supernatural" or "miraculous".\nBased on what I know, I can make the certain conclusion that the universe is not merely limited to the existence of human beings.  We are important, but we are such a minute part of the creative force or energy that seems to surround us at all times.  The greatest of scientists and philosophers will tell you that there are far greater things, worlds, ideas, and concepts at work in our world than we can ever imagine.  Certainly, if there was such enormous energy that this whole galaxy evolved, why should it be limited just to animals, plants, and humans?  The main conclusion one can come to is that, yes, there are those beings, spiritual or physical or both, that are among us in different ways and realities.  And yet there are some completely natural phenomena that early uneducated man propagated as something supernatural and now we wonder what it may be.  Ultimately, everything can be explained scientifically or mathematically, even "ghosts" or "aliens". (As a matter of fact, we have come to call them "aliens", but all that it is is just other diverse life forms, some look like us, who have evolved in other galaxies, universes, etc.)  \nIt is not a fact of whether we believe or don't believe, but rather a fact of how open minded and adventurous we remain.  When we are born, nature provides us with a great openness of heart and mind and a great adventurousness for us to develop even more of it.  How sad it is that some would rather stick to the boring, simple concepts of Life as illustrated by the fact that we reason away our natural desire to be open and inquisitive.  I hope that people who read this will get encouraged on their search for truth.  Or for those who prefer otherwise, it is your choice after all and nobody should judge you for it, I hope you will one day truly investigate at least one of those things that seem to be "taboo" in our society to support (other life forms, us as spiritual beings existing in physical bodies, other mystical creatures).  After all, no matter what the truth is, the ultimate truth about our universe will always be there, and you will only get smarter and wiser if you dare to ask the hard questions and heartfully search for answers.
318126
The originator who is the semi-famous science fiction author "L. Ron Hubbard" started it.  Remember the movie "Battlefield Earth"?  it was based on one of his books.   He has been known to say "If you can create your own religion then you would be rich..."  his Dianetics seems to be a mixture of psuedo freudian pop science. It is a cult.
861786
Call newschannel 3, I bet they would look into it.  Royal Norman may even already have an answer.  I have not seen them, though I live very close to you.  I'll have to keep my eye on the SE sky.  Do they occur at a certain time, or various times?  Are they low to the horizon?
962787
I've not heard it but they either copied it somewhere or it IS the same guy. Either way, they are lying!   Good luck!!!!!
249940
I had to look it up which is the one thing about Yahoo Answers that I adore, all of these questions about thing you never heard of before. It sounded interesting so this is what I found.\n\nThey may be all around us... in the sky, in the water, even in our homes. They have been captured only on film and videotape. No one knows what they are, where they come from, whether or not they are alive, and they have never been touched or seen at rest.\n\nThey are called "rods," "skyfish" and sometimes "solar entities." Although the video evidence is compelling that they are quite real and probably living creatures, they are completely unknown to science - a fascinating and baffling mystery.\n\nSkyfish were first documented by filmmaker José Escamilla, who discovered them by accident. In 1994, Escamilla had videotaped a "conventional" UFO near Midway, New Mexico. Fourteen days later, while seeking to photograph the UFO again, he instead captured a flying object that was not a vehicle of any kind. At first he thought it was just an insect or bird. When he examined the film frame by frame, however, it became clear that what he had captured on film was something unknown. Later, more distinct images were captured while Escamilla was filming cliff jumpers at a deep cave in Mexico. When he developed the film, small flying things could be seen zipping around the divers at a high rate of speed - so fast that they weren't seen with the naked eye. \n\nThe enhanced frames of film revealed that the flying thing appeared to be rod-shaped with two undulating wings or appendages along the length of the body and which gave it the appearance of swimming through the air. Escamilla dubbed them "rods" and has since filmed and videotaped them dozens of times. And after introducing them to the public through his website, roswellrods.com, he has received further reports and video and photographic evidence from other parts of the US and around the world. The strange flying enigmas have also turned up in documentary footage, TV news shots and even feature films.\n\nAre They Alive?\n\nWithout a specimen in hand to examine, it's impossible to determine whether or not skyfish are living organisms, but it's Escamilla's best guess that they are. The video evidence certainly makes them seem so. They move through the air like insects or birds, sometimes darting around objects with a kind of animal intelligence - but at a speed far greater than any known insect or bird. How fast? Analysis of film and video of skyfish from around the world indicate that they can be moving as fast as 150 to 1,000 miles per hour - faster than the speed of sound. \n\nHow big are they? The same analysis indicates that they might range in size from just a few inches to perhaps over a hundred feet in length! How could something that large be unknown? That's part of the skyfish mystery, yet there they are on video.\n\nAlthough most skyfish have been seen in the air outdoors, they have also been photographed and videotaped indoors and even underwater. A photograph displayed on Kitty's Kitchen website appears to show a skyfish in mid-flight ready to pass through a doorway in her home. And a TV news report on Escamilla from KCOP Channel 13 includes clear footage of a skyfish swimming in a stream, indicating that they are equally at home in the water