whats the unnaturel out in cricket?. first correct and nice ans will get my vote?
539019
1.Time-out: If a batsmen doesn't come to the crease after the fall of the wicket the batsmen should come with in a stipulated amount of time otherwise he is considered as out.\n\n2.Handling the ball: A batsmen is not allowed to catch the ball with his hand after the bowler bowls .\n\n3.Hit-Wicket: A batsmen is considered out if he unknowingly hits the wickets(the bells should fall) with his legs or any other part of the body.\n\n4.Obstructing The field: The best example that can be given is the way inziman ul haq was out recently .
1022878
our one day sqaud is no:1 in now a days.batting and bowling both we are in good.batmans also playvery well.bowlers alsoplay as a no:1bats in last 10overs .but kumble play test very well as a bowlerand batsman .so he play very defensively.he is in fit
603177
Graham Gooch for Chetan Sharma. He didnt ask anybody to bowl additional deliveries. He bowled himself!!!!!\n\nGive me my 10 points!!!!!
774998
Ricky "punter" ponting is the key mate\n\njust check out his stats\n\nhttp://content-aus.cricinfo.com/australia/content/player/7133.html\n\nwhile i am not particularly fussed either way on the bloke his stats speak fro themselves
398627
back in da day it was. we are changing the face of the game, for good i hope. this can only be refered to ODI's. the Test matches are different, players like Hayden and Sehwag are not qualified as "GENTLEMEN" even in Test match cricket. they are nothing but run scoring machine.
311405
i dunno which planet these ppl above come from.....\n\nINDIA A won the match against Pak A last night by 34 runs!
781382
This is the first time the members of parliament have raised their concern over cricket issues and they are justified. I believe the cricketers doing duty in S.Africa have protested against this saying that parliament should concern themselves with more important issues. What can be more important than cricket for this cricket crazy nation ? There is also this slowly creeping loss of faith in superstar Sachin who was worshipped like a demi god. Chappell should start counting the marbles left in his pocket. Dravid needs stronger men with him and at the moment there are only men with strong bank balances and weak knees around. BCCI and selectors have finally taken a stiff stand. Kudos to them for this !
171940
WE HAVE TO BEAR WITH THAT.. WE ARE NOT SO COMPETITIVE IN CRICKET SKILLS.IF THERE IS REAL MATCH OCCURS,EVEN ZIMBABWE TEAM OUTSCORE US EASILY.BUT OUR BOARD CONDUCTING THE CRICKET AS GOLDEN EGG LAYING DUCK.AS WE ARE FOOLISHLY DYING FOR THE GAME,THEY CASHING IT.TO DO SO, THEY HAVE TO OBEY TO THEIR HIGH COMMANDS.CHAPPEL MATTER IS ONE OF THAT..
865689
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/default.stm
815957
What makes you think his wicket is sticky?  It could be smooooooove and well greased.
628984
whats happened to everyone ??he's talking about cricket world cup 2007,in west indies.have u all got so addicted that u guys no more remember which year this is??its still 2006!!!!\nengland's  chances pretty good!!look at their line-up they've got all-rounders like flintoff,collingwood..geraint jones can be a handy bat..some fine batsmen...and....world class bowlers...haven't got a got a genuine spinner though...when vaughn returns from injury u have one very good side !!!forget their recent loss in India..conditions were so tough & injuries to key players can seriously affect your combination...their chances in WC '07 are much more solid than that of aussies..but there are some prety good teams around aswell!!!
40399
'turbun's working well in cricket.\ni know only that..
408470
If our Cricket board can get rid of these grave politics, there is no reason why a worldclass player like Sourav cannot represent his nation in Worldcup.\nHow can we forget that we proceeded to the finals of the last WorldCup under his Captaincy?\nWe should always choose the best team for reaching the ultimate goal, and I think Sourav will fit the slot by his own charisma.
988765
a website that is only for cricket, http://www.friendscyberclub.com/cricket/ check out the latest in cricket, also you can post your comments there, post what you like, also please visit the forum, http://www.friendscyberclub.com/cricket/cricketforum.html there you can vote for you favorite players, and there is plenty more, check it out, remember you people run this place, so, please tell others about it,
534810
Well it has it's Pros but it also has it's Cons.If LBW decisions are referred to the Third Umpire then Wrong Decsisions will be eliminated from the game.However precious time will be wasted in referring each decision to the Third Umpire as there are many LBW and Runout appeals made in the course of the game.Hence a ODI will last an hour longer than now.Also it will reduce the role of the on-field umpires to just referring decisions to the Third Umpire.So I feel if the Onfield umpires a doing a good job which I believe they are doing then we should just continue wuth the current system and not introduce too much technology in the game.
709239
Cricket of course, What else?
878048
Umphire needs to remain in icc, he never did wrong first. all by the player inzamam. why should he tampered him? its usual any one get angry if u distrub them. SO my view is the umphire must need to continue