what is meant by "time space relationship"?
553064
Simply the relationship between the 3 spatial directions (length, width, heighth) and time as it passes.  It is usually used in conjunction with Einstein's Theories of Relativity.  Essentially we are trying to model the universe mathematically and hoping to observe it by looking through  telescopes and using other sensors. Think of a simple example as of you in a room and you simply dance around for 30 minutes.  The relationship is then tracking your movements over the 30 min of time, then seeing if we can predict anything about your behavior(as the object).  There's tons of very theoretical math available, but it very difficult to follow w/o the background to start with.  For those of us who have studied the subjects of theortical mathematics, physics and astrophysics, and cosmology (studying the cosmos and its history) it can be extremely interesting.
432971
The idea that time is another dimension is not currently in favor, so if you were to take a contemporary view, time isnt a dimension at all.  Thus, a 2 dimensional object moving through time would be just that- a changable 2D object.  Time is a degree of freedom for motion, physical and chemical reactions, etc, but not (again, currently thought) to be a dimension equivalent to the three we exist in (or the 13 or so that are sub-microscopic).
10953
well yeah... \nwell we dont have any definitive start or end point, so it's only relative to itself meaning that you can only measure a change in time, not how much of it you actually have. \nyour actual question is a little ambiguous, if this isnt what you meant, you can add some to the question,  are you looking for an explanation of how high velocities distort time or something, because I can explain that if you would like, just add it onto the question or make a new one or something.
600049
The three dimensions they are most likely talking about are the x,y, and z planes in space. Time is the fourth dimension, and there could be more after that. read stephen hawkings book A Brief History of Time. He explains how to conceptualize dimensions in your head very well.
462967
yes, space and time are forever linked into spacetime. please read the pages to which the following link leads. i hope they answer your question.
737506
Hi. The first three are physical, the fourth is temporal, the rest are mathematical. We think of the fourth as time, but it really is not. Time, when you get down to it, is an infinite series of 'moments', not to be confused with seconds, years, picoseconds, etc. Humans tend to measure the passing of time in rather coarse terms. If you could see time then objects would be stretched out. A human, for instance, would look like a very long worm tapering from very small (an egg) to adult size to bones, which would last the longest.
569838
Time is a forth dimension.
918805
Time And Relative Dimension In Space
601936
I believe that true time is simply another dimension we just haven't figured out how to move in any but one direction. Time as in seconds, minutes, etc are nothing but a random measurement we have placed on that axis; more random than how we chose inches, feet, or meters for the other axis'.
20367
Well, its pretty much as crimsonmoonvc said.\n\nUnlike the spatial dimensions of perception, time is not directly accessable by any sensory organ. We precieve time by the unfolding of the events around us.
26586
Science currently views the nature of space-time has a 3-D surface which is difficult for us to comprehend since we are accustomed to 2-D surfaces only.  Like all surfaces they have no spatial boundary.  Imagine the surface of a balloon.  If you were confined to move on its surface and travel all over you would not find an edge.  Of course there is a "above and below" but in the context of the universe these are not spatial dimensions but temporal ones.
267029
Yes, time is a relative and would be preceived differently if it could be perceived from all the various perspectives.  Time and space fold in upon each other and we see a result but not the only result.
128617
length, width, depth. Time and space
1071518
Time And Relative Dimension (or Dimensions) In Space
471213
It all dependend where you are filling time. In an insane intitution there are people who experience 4 ,5 of more dimentions . so far I have heard of 26 dimensions being filled including many dimentions of time.\nSpace and time have the same thing in common they can be filled both at the same instance!
1186741
Time is called a dimension because in Einstein's theory of relativity it makes mathematical sense to do so. Events happen in spacetime, 3 spatial and 1 time dimension. But their orientation in space and time relative to each other, depends on the observer and the relative speeds of the events.\n\nIn Einstein's formulas these dimensions are mixed by transformations depending on the velocities. This works only if we add time as a dimension.    \n\nTo give the *position* of an event in four dimensional space-time you need to give a reference observer first, another event, relative to which you measure.  And the answer will depend on your speed and the speed of the observer. And that is just what relativity means: the resulting coordinates or not the same for everybody but depend on the relative speeds.
128525
I don't think that is correct.   I assume you mean fourth spatial dimension, rather than the Minkowski 3 space, 1 time geometry of relativity.  For that, time is actually a dimension, and the question pretty much answers itself.\n\nThe best insight into a spatial fourth dimension is to read the delightful classic little book, "Flatland". Almost any library or bookstore should have it. It works on the analogy of an individual who lives in a two dimensional world - his name is "A. Square" - who learns about three dimensions.\n\nAnother way to insight would be to look up "tesseract" on a search engine. Aside from hits on Madalyn L'engel's misuse of the term in her children's boooks (avoid her description), you should find many discussions on how to represent simple four dimensional objects in three dimensions, just as we represent three dimensional objects on a flat piece of paper with perspective.\n\nFour dimensions would have two directions that are perpendicular to our three dimensional world. They have been given the names "ana" for four dimensional "up" and "kata" for four dimensional "down" with respect to our space. Of course these are just the Greek words for up and down. \n\nSo borrowing a description from Flatland, if a four dimensional sphere were to start anawards of our world and move through it in the kata direction, what we would see, as it intersected our world woild be first a tiny three dimensional sphere (cross section of the four dimensional sphere near its kata pole) which grows in size to a maximum (the "equator" passing through), and then decreases gradually again to its mini size before vanishing, having passed commpletely through our world and out the other side.