Is George Bush a terrorist?
549915
according to his definition , he would be looked at as a terrorist
1061193
Because you question the Bush doctorine, that makes you a terrorist.\n\nprepare to be invaded.
1125954
IT IS LIKE CHOOSING BETWEEN EVIL AND EVIL..\n\nboth have excelled as criminals and are actually muderers responsible for the death of uncountable innocent people..\n\nbut yes george bush is better because he doesn't believe that other religions are religions of kafirs and that shariyat should be established..  \natleast his jehad has a motive (oil...oil...oil in iraq)\nosama's doesn't make sense..
130407
no. this whole spy thing is making me sick. the bush admon has everyone so scared of the ambiguously defined terrorists that they're willing to give rights away blindly. Honestly, wake up!
451177
Yes, I too believe that the biggest TERRORIST on the face of this earth if any is MR BUSH. I just can't understand why he is killing Millions innocents for one man. I think he should "STOP SUCKING BLOOD FOR OIL".
1049509
Do you have a particular reason for asking this?  Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist and Bush is a President.  It is a difficult question as disliking one does not include liking the other.  I dislike Osama for many reasons much more serious that the ones I have for disliking President Bush. Likewise, I have some sense of patriotism that nudges me to help support our president from a national point-of-view when I think it appropriate.  While, at the same time, I have nothing but ill-will towards Al Quaida and other groups that take the beautiful religion of Islam and slander it to create hate around the world.
721305
Yes he is, both are terrorist.
87720
Why is this action that is happening against terrorist's and terrorist activities always being attached to Bush as if he was doing this alone and not in the name of our country.  We may have gone into Iraq for the wrong reasons, but we are there and to leave now would be more of a disaster than us being there so far.  On September 11, 2001 the terrorist's made an attack that finally got our attention.  That is what Osama bin Laden did was get our attention.  Last week people were rioting over the "Danish Cartoon Scandal" and chanting bin Laden attack them again.  What are we supposed to think?  Muslim's call for death to all infidels, which is most of the American Population and then I am told by someone here on this Forum that I misunderstand it is the Jews that want to kill everyone but them off.  Come on now which is it you want us attacked again, but we are supposed to believe that it is being done by Jews?  Are you doing the Jews work for them or do I just misunderstand what I am seeing everyday?  After Bush you will have another American president to hate along with all of us that are left to support them.  Bush is not King, Bush is not dictator, he is just an elected president of the greatest country on earth and you do not understand freedom and so you fear us.
453378
George Bush\n\n      Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. - US Federal Bureau of Investigation\n\nRead the sentence carefully. You didn’t hear it on any corporate media newscast since 9/11. It’s the official US FBI definition of terrorism.  In its official definition, the FBI does not limit terrorism to stateless individuals or groups. In its official definition, the FBI does not suggest that terrorism cannot be perpetrated by the leader of a nation state. But even more amazing is that the official FBI definition of terrorism describes exactly what George Bush did in the aftermath of the attacks of 9/11!\n\nAPPLYING THE DEFINITION\n\n    *\n      George W. Bush, in his unprovoked attack against the sovereign nation of Iraq, openly violated the UN Charter, to which the US is a signatory.  The Charter's core principles contained in Article 2(4) and Article 51 prohibit one nation from attacking another except in self-defense or with the authority of the U.N. In effect, George Bush launched an unlawful use of force against persons and property.\n    *\n      The invasion launched by George W. Bush was heralded by the most frightening and powerful use of force and military violence in recent history. His Shock and Awe bombardment of Baghdad was designed to intimidate and coerce the government as well as the civilian population of that nation to change its existing leadership. That, in itself, was a political objective.\n    *\n      The purpose of the invasion and ensuing occupation of Iraq was to replace the existing dictatorship with an American-backed form of democracy that would not permit the emergence of a government headed by the majority Shia religious leadership.  These motives were unquestionably political and social.\n\nSo, what part of the FBI definition of “terrorism” do the voters of the United States not understand?  And what acts of terrorism as defined by the FBI do the voters of the United States not recognize?  Is there any doubt at all that the Bush administration committed acts of terrorism when it unlawfully used force and violence against the nation of Iraq to intimidate and coerce its government and the civilian population, in furtherance of the Bush/PNAC political and social objectives.\n\nTherefore, by any definition, if George W. Bush is guilty of terrorism, he can accurately be identified as a TERRORIST. And if he is truly a terrorist, it is only fitting that George W. Bush be scrutinized in terms of his success in that capacity.  What is his standing among the other murderous terrorist activity in the world today?  Is it possible that George W. Bush actually has claim to being the very BEST at something during his reign in office?
314787
Maybe your not seeing the light babe! Bush is a criminal, and so is most of his staff. His Secretary of Homeland Security was caught with his molesting hands on a 14 year old girl. These are the people that are in charge of the Patriot Act. Tom Delay is another, Jack Abramoff is another, Cheney shooting his lawyer is another. It's on, and on.
1090128
The world would be a safer place without Bush's antic's, without Bush much of the things that have happened wouldn't have happened. He is feeding the terrorist, which in turn feeds himself.
906610
I'm not sure if he is a terrorist or not.  At first i thought he was but now i'm thinking he is a good guy.  there's a lot of things about this show that leave you guessing, we'll just have to wait and see.
1121964
George W. Bush doesn't deserve sh!t.  First of all, he's the president.  His job is to say either "yes" or "no" to any action that the FBI, CIA, or the US military comes up with.  He doesn't really DO anything in that respect.  Second, by committing the United States in an illegal, unjust, and unnessecary  war in Iraq, he has done more harm than good in the so-called "War on Terror".  Third, you need to consult more than one source for the news.  Al Qaida is still around somewhere and there's no evidence to support the fact that Al Qaida is no longer a threat to anyone.
332268
The answer is YES\n\nIn the "Global War On Terror" where Terrorists are the enemy, YES Most Terrorists are Muslim. You left a quantitative loop hole "most" and therefore it must be recognized also that NOT ALL Terrorists are Muslim and conversely NOT ALL Muslims are Terrorists. But in the current world the largest portion of Terrorists that pose a threat the to the national security of most (if not all) free and sovereign nations are Muslim extremist.\n\nNow about the IRA... International Terrorists... same as Al Quida and Islamic Jihad etc... \n\nTimothy McVeigh - Domestic Terrorist - Only a threat to national security of his home nation (well... when he was alive that is) \nMAFIA, Organized Crime, etc... - No direct threat to national security - in fact - probably operate to some degree with respect for governmental authority as those criminal organizations that have been most successful have been able to "work the system" to their favor and take advantage of the laws of the land  - i.e. Al Capone would never have been able to build his empire (started by boot-legging Canadian Whiskey into The US) had the 18th Amendment never been created.
999545
Yes.\n\nAny government that launches OFFENSIVE military action is by definition terrorist.
1168040
Yes I do.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not in the habbit of defending Bush, but Bin Laden's family has more people in it than you could possibly imagine.  Just because he had dealings with Bin Laden's family doesn't mean he (or they) have any ties to Bin Laden.
91069
No way. It was Bush's way of diverting the american public's attention from more important issues, PLUS, it was a great way for him to make some extra money. \n\nTerrorism is a threat only if you let it be. Wake up, it's all make-believe.