what you people think that what are the basic reason's with u.s.a to attack Iran only nuclear issue? or many ?
542731
#1 OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL- Shall I go on.\n\n#2 The fear by the BIG 5 Oil Companies that the Iranians would close the Strait of Hormuz and slow the PROFITS to them and the rest of the White House GOP BushPig sucking Cuntservatives. \n\n#3 To protect the Jews and Israel that the White House loves to throw taxpayer money at because it bounces back, right into their pockets. \n\n#4 Nukes are far from the whole reason but they are a part. Iran would have to know that their country would become a waste land if they attempted to fire on the U.S. first. Iran would fire a missile with ONE warhead and the U.S. would shoot back one missile with 10 warheads apiece for combined destruction of about 10,000 sq. miles of destruction or the whole country and contaminate the whole of the Middle East and Europe.
640884
Hopefully never. Even though Iran's push for enriched uranium is totally wrong, for the US to go and attack another arabic nation would open up a whole new bag of worms. I think Bush and his mates should get over themselves. Violence solves nothing...just causes more pain for more people.
480674
Iran is an odd case.  Up to about three years ago relations between the US and Iran were thawing.  Although both nations were making loud public statements denouncing the other there were several agreements reached (for example when Iran promised to allow any US military aricraft in distress the right to land at an iranian airfield).\n\nIf Iran were not stupidly getting the entire world upset at them with their nuclear projects - I would expect that the US and Iran would be discussing re-opening diplomatic relations.\n\nThe problem Iran has is that the people running the country are not popular and need something to distract the Iranian people's attention away from thier internal policy failures and poor economic performance.  \n\nIMO what we need to do is just wait them out.
309545
WE won't attack Iran,we might bomb your enrichment facilities.Iran is maneuvering its self into a position that most of the world will not allow.Yes you have oil,But larger more powerful countries who could take it have instead either not bought from you or have bought from you.\nBut the world is hungry for that oil,can Iran really afford to go around slapping faces of larger nations?
68592
I think that this question is totally irrelevant. If Iran( or any muslim nation against USA)  builds nuclear facilities (civilian or military) americans will destroy that country (only becoz they c them as a threat).\n\nI think that america's common sense has been permanantly crippled by bin laden. Post 911 America views the whole world suspiciously (except their slaves in UK and friends in Israel). America has ever since been contradicting themselves. Remember the war in iraq, it was fought bcoz bush claimed to have evidence of non existent weapons and the threat of a dictator.My question to the world is "If iraq , y not pakistan?". Mushy's a dictator and one who openly admits to having nuclear weapons.\n\nI predict that soon the patience of the international community will run out. A grand alliance (Russia, China , France , India and the Arab world) could be formed so that america and americans will exist only in history textbooks.
432893
An air strike against Iranian nuclear facilities is unlikely to be surgical. There are about 50 sites associated with nuclear development in Iran and they are mainly sited in towns where civilian populations would be at risk. An attack would be certain to inflame the Islamic world against the US, almost certainly lead to a full-scale civil war in Iraq with the support of the predominantly Shiite Iranian people, and the US fleet in the shallow and narrow Persian Gulf would have to withdraw or be vulnerable to Iranian missile attack.The cynical explanation for the Bush Administration's threats against Iran is that, like the build-up to the invasion of Iraq, the real objective is "regime change", which has been re-enforced by the slump in President Bush's approval rating to 34 per cent.The ramifications of such an attack could be disastrous. At a minimum, it would likely “rally the Iranian public around an otherwise unpopular regime, inflame anti-American anger around the Muslim world, and jeopardize the already fragile U.S. position in Iraq.” But most importantly, a military strike would “almost certainly speed…up” Iran’s nuclear weapons development by sparking a “crash nuclear program that could produce a bomb in a few years.”
91713
This is merely opinion.\n\nI don't think the majority of the American people have a problem with the majority of the Iranian people.  However, there is a small minority of people in Iran that seem to be intent on the destruction of the United States.  Some of those people are now in power in Iran.\n\nYou ask why we think Iran is more dangerous?  Probably because those other countries' leaders have not openly called the United States "The Great Satan".  Probably because those countries aren't broadcasting constant anti-American propaganda.  \n\nWe have no problem with the people of Iran.  But we do have a problem with fanatic people in ANY nation who would illogically choose to use nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction because we choose not to follow Islam.  \n\nAnd, why is there so much fervor over a silly cartoon?  Yes, I agree that the cartoon profanes your prophet - peace be upon him, and I think it was in poor taste for them to do that.  But I've had people profane my God every day on here, and in the media.  I don't like it, but I'm not about to demonstrate and/or demand that they die or anything like that.\n\nIf leaders of Islam would demonstrate some tolerance and love towards America, we might see Islam in the light that your Prophet - peace be upon him - wanted the world to see.
460003
Nuclear power is not the issue.  Nuclear bombs are the issue. The president of Iran has said he wants to wipe out Israel, which is fine with me, but I doubt if Israel is going to just sit there and let itself be wiped out.  You can bet that Israel has plans to launch a strike on Iran and you can bet the US has a plan drawn up to invade, which is fine also. But I think that if the US launches an attack it should not necessarily be the same way as in Iraq with the goal of regime change.  The US should simply blow up all Iran's nuclear facilities and leave them totally disintegrated with absolutely nothing left but a big hole in the ground; if this means using nuclear weapons then fine.  Just blow the place up and leave it at that, and let the Iranians deal with the mess.  If they try to rebuild it, blow it up again, and so on forever.  Muslims are a very dangerous threat to mankind and should not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, because they will come up with all this Allah jihad holy bullshit as justification to use it, which is all a crock of baloney anyway.
413984
no, there is no reasonable explanation why Iran should be allowed to enrich Uranium. I am not saying this because I am an American, I am saying this because I live on this planet, and no offense to anyone, but some of those Iranian extremists scare the crap out of me, because they would not think twice about completely obliterating our world with a nuclear or atomic weapon. Once again, no offense to Iranians who are not crazy extremists.
1037456
I am sorry I did not understand part of your question but I can tell you that America Is not against the Iranian people.  It has serious concerns about the extremists in the government with an anti American and anti Israeli attitude that are threatening the world by attempting to develop nuclear weapons.  Let us hope this can be resolved peacefully.
210852
of course peace should be the target for everybody in this world,but FAIR PEACE.\nif usa or israel or anybody else attacked IRAN or any other nation,its logic that they should defend themselve by attacking back.
621632
Iran is rebellious and cool. Yes the president is a bit "different", but so what? If Iran want to make nuclear and chemical weapons So What? The only people that are making a big deal about this are the americans. You don't see any body else moaning about it. 8 other countries are also creating nuclear and chemical weapons, and they could be just as much of a threat as Iran, but you don't see the americans picking on them do you? \n\nThe American government should leave Iran alone, they have done nothing wrong, no terrorist actions have been done by them, they haven't bombed anywhere so, what is the big deal. What are the americans so scared of? They have the biggest and most powerful weapons in the whole wide world. So what's with all the fuss. And also The americans wouldn't dare invade Iran! It would cause world war three, since russia and china are there alles (iran). so it would be too much of a big risk. Iran is an amazing country, yea sure it has it's problems, but what country in this world doesn't. The american government are giving there lovely and amazing country a bad name, making most people in europe and other places dislike them. \n\nAs an Iranian myself, I can say that Iran is a regular country, just like china, russia, india ...etc (they are also making chemical weapons). I wish people and governments in this world could live in peace and happiness, but i guess I'm asking for the impossible, considering most people's attitudes.
596669
Iran is only trying to get nuclear POWER, not a bomb, AND\nthey don't have the technology to deliver anything to the USA even if they did have a bomb, which they don't.
387913
that should be something that Iran should worry about. and i also agree with the first answer. it saves us a war.
459616
Personally I do not think that we need to go nuclear on anyone. Iran is a Middle Eastern country that we should not have involvement in. This country (US) is great on spreading democracy but other than oil what is our interest there? Why in the world do we need to be making everyone do our bidding? We need to focus in this country on how to improve our own job situations, education, over population, excessive oil use, and  focus on our country not theirs. That is my opinion.
626966
Zero, this thing is to create more fear and confusion for ignorant people to rant and rave about. Voting tactics from the GOP, but it's not working anymore because nobody is listening to any Republicans. Iran has never made any aggression to other nations, and it will be really hard to get any coalition support other then sanctions. The political agendas have nothing to do with the aggression of war, it's all politics.
17494
US will not dare attacking Iran. Iran isn't like Iraq and is the biggest military power in the middle east. Iran is one of the biggest suppliers of oil in the world, if this attack happens the prices of oil will rise to big amounts like 90 dollars, and maybe even more. US knows that it has several military bases in the range of Iranian missles and in the case of this war Iran can easily hit American bases specially in Iraq. United States knows that in the case of this attack Iran isn't the loser, because the people of Iran have always supported their country in the case of a war. Iran has some close allies in Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon each one of these allies can cause big damages to the American troops.\nAirforce is not an option. United States can't attack Iran with airforce because of the new anti aircraft and missle systems Iran has bought from Russia. Nuclear War is not going to happen.\nBut we have seen many idiotic acts from the American Govt. so anything is possible.