The video released by Government regarding pentagon plane crash,Do u think it porves anything clearly?
553816
wasn't supposed to.  There is no doubt that a plane flew into the pentagon and two into the World Trade Center.\n\n\n\n\nPS.  It proves it takes to long to enforce the the freedom of information act.
302149
I actually believe the fourth plane (United 93) was in fact shot down.  I don't believe the passengers brought the plane down. I don't think anyone is going to know for sure for a long, long time and I think the story about the passengers bringing the plane down was circulated because America desparately needed a hero to believe in then. \n\nThat said, the SOP's have been changed, because the SOP's back then were not adequate. If you drive down VA Rte 110 which goes very close to the Pentagon, you may catch a glimpse of anti-aircraft weaponry placed around the facility.  And the response time for a fighter jet to get in the air is a lot lower. We had never had a situation like that before and we got caught unprepared.
412944
Yea it's Conspiracy, If U have lime wire then Search about 9-11 Conspiracy on Movie. U'll find a Program over there Show U that there was No plain Hit the Pentagon & They Just Say So, & The Plain which Hit the two Building had A Missle on Them ... There Is No Boing Have Missle & There is No Missile even in Cargo plain. & How G.W.Bush told the PPL that He open the TV & watched they show the First Plain hit the Building & They Didn't Capture that one by News Cam & they got it from someone who was capture a fire beside that Building ... Alot U going to Discover on that Movie. To be sure it's the Movie ... Just write on Lime Wire Video search " 911 Conspiracy " & Then find the Movie which have size 498 MB. Then Download it & U'll discover that The Government of USA did Allllllllllllllllll.
627907
I'm very weary of the conspiracy theories. As one of the people who watched the plane go into the Pentagon (literally watched it hit), it makes me very annoyed to see how many people think so many other people could be wrong, imaging things, or a part of a conspiracy. Maybe the theory would be credible if no one was around to watch.  But between NYC and DC/Arlington, both in the tail end of rush hour commuter traffic, you'd have to get about 50,000 people to agree to this conspiracy. I find it insulting and I am immediately annoyed by anyone who actually thinks these web sites are reporting the truth.
994903
They should release all 84 confiscated videos as well as rescind all 2500 or so gag orders that have been placed on witnesses, either through direct threat or as part of their victim compensation packages.\n\nWhy can't some witnesses talk about what they saw and others can?  Why can't they just show one of the 84 videos where an actual plane hits the Pentagon to shut up the conspiracy folks?
427073
I was less than a quarter mile away from the Pentagon and I was looking right at that plane--- normal commercial airliner--- when it went in. I'm usually all about the conspiracy theories but this one is bunk.  I smelled the jet fuel burning and saw the bits of plane fall from the sky along with people's clothes from their exploded luggage.
1018999
No official report corroborates your claims.  You're really embarrassing yourself.  The use of profanity only shows you lack understanding, intelligence, and logic skills.  That is why you let a novice fiction filmmaker spoon-feed you information contradicting everything you saw on that day.  I am sorry for you.\n\nThe terrorists on flight 77 did not need to take off nor land the plane.  The take-off part had been done for them.  They never planned to land.  So what does it matter if they had trouble with landings?\n\nImpossible turns?  Could it be that the terrorists didn't know what they were doing?  I doubt they planned to make those insane maneuvers.  The first attempt at the pentagon was botched, so they had no choice.  They were planning to die anyway, why wouldn't they attempt an "impossible" maneuver?\n\nLight poles at the pentagon were knocked from their break-away bases (new safety design), unlike the poles the filmmaker references in another accident.  Oh, and ripped out of the ground is not damaged???  The poles did exactly what they were designed to do.\n\nhttp://911myths.com/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\n\nNow please shut up.
581955
notice you don't have as many people telling you your an idiot with this question.  Its because the media hasn't told them what to think yet.....\n\nThe Pentagon didn't even have a wall knocked down!  Not even a wall! Come on people if a plane hits a wall going 500mph its going to knock the wall over.
317807
If you mean was the government story about what happened a hoax? Absolutely. But the event itself was all too real ... 3000 people and several buildings are gone.\n\nFor a fantastic documentary exploring many of the questions about what happened 9-11, watch Loose Change.\nGoogle video has it here for free:\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848
671533
there is no plane, i don't know what ure talking about. \n\nthere is something looks like a missile there, that's it. \n\nthe explosion looks like a missile too.\n\nif we had been left to ourselves, we all would have concluded it was a missile from those videos. \n\nso why isn't it still a missile?\n\nfor me it is.\n\ni've also asked questions about this, eg http://answers.yahoo.com/question/;_ylt=Aj88bu8qapSC7kpafAnQHnAjzKIX?qid=1006051828435
273576
my answer to your other question:  i am happy that you are trying to get the word out about loose change, but this is the wrong way. i have seen it and have casually brought it up with friends and family, and i have gotten a lot of odd looks. the other two who really listened to me was my dad and mom, and kinda my little brother. as for friends, i told these two guys that i was talking to about it, and he retaliated with that he saw the back of the plate sticking out of the pentagon. i cracked up on that. and he said that the explosions in the towers were from copiers explaining. ha ha looser. i got pissed with that one tho, he wouldn't even listen to my point of views.\n\na lot of people are like, pssh consitiany theory.. stupid.. but have they even watched it?  they can not call it that unless they have actually watched it.  it is an hour + half hour long, but really worth it.
1178700
Check out Google Videos for this presentation-I don't have all the answers; yet it seems compelling that something "other" than a plane explosion took place- you decide..
1163400
considering that one of the first things i saw on the page said, "Proof Blue Screen Technology Faked 2nd Plane "  i know its crap.\ni'm tired of writing about the 911 conspiracy stuff and these conspiracy ideas floating around right now are just getting more and more outrageous.  are there some questions that need to be answered about 911? yes probably are a few....but these questions have NOTHING to do with: now blue screened planes, planes swapped secretly for missiles and drones, faked plane crashes, secret voice sampled passengers to fake phone calls home, secret landing fields, breakaway light poles, hundreds to thousands of planted "witnesses" and fake work crews planting explosives.\nthis stuff is either some strange disinformation campaign, or someone trying to make a buck off people who don't trust the government and can't think.
837704
There was no plane hit the Pentagon.\nAccording to the official BTS statistics, flight AA77 did not fly that day.\n\nManufactured terrorism\nhttp://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html
173438
Watch this.\nhttp://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php#main
1075311
yes. he lied about seeing the 1st plane hit on cnn but the footage didnt air for another 14 hours. the fbi, cia, nas & dod all had info in the hijackers. their locations, pasts, their financing, their intentions & the training they were getting. its all been documented.  http://scotthortonshow.com/
506645
OF COURSE THE SEPTEMBER 11 INCIDENTS WHERE ACTUALLY FAKE JUST LIKE THE MOON LANDING . AMERICA AGAIN FOOLED THE WORLD.\n\nTHERE IS EVEN A VIDEO ABOUT THIS .\n\nTHE MAIN REASONS THAT THEY SAY ARE AS FOLLOWS\n\n1.THE AIRCRAFTS THAT STRIKED THE WTC TOWERS WERE NOT HAVING ANY WINDOWS WHICH CLEARLY SHOWED THAT THEY ARE NOT PASSENGER AIRCRAFTS . PROBABLY MILITARY CARGOS .\n\n2. WHEN THE VIDEO IS ZOOMED IN WE CAN CLEARLY SEE SOME THING THAT IS ATTACHED TO THE BELLY OF THE AIRCRAFT .NO PASSENGER AIRCRAFT WILL HAVE SOME THING THIS ATTACHED TO ITS FUSELAGE .WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS THAT IT IS NOT A PASSENGER AIRCRAFT .\n\n3. THERE IS AN SMALL EXPLOSION ON BOTH THE AIRCRAFTS JUST BEFORE STRIKING INSIDE THE WTC TOWER . THIS CAN BE CLEARY SEEN IF THE VIDEOS ARE ZOOMED . \n\n4.IN THE VIDEO THAT SHOWS THE PENTAGON ATTACK THERE IS NO AIRCRAFT AT ALL SHOWN IN THE VIDEO .ONLY A SUDDEN EXPLOSION IS SHOWN .ALSO THERE IS NOT EVEN A SINGLE PIECE OF AIRCRAFT WRECKAGE ON THE SITE EVEN IN THE VIDEOS THAT WERE TAKEN IMMEDIATLY AFTER THE INCIDENT .\n\n5.ALSO A STUDY HAS CONFIRMED THAT IF A BOEING 757 WITH THE SAID AMOUNT OF FUEL CRASHED INTO THE PENTAGON THE DAMAGE WOULD BE VERY MUCH MORE THAN THIS . ANALYSISTS HAVE CALCULATED THE IMPACT STRENGTH AND THE CAPABILITY OF THE MATERIALS WITH WHICH PENTAGON IS CONSTRUCTED .\n\nAMAERICA JUST WANTED A REASON TO ATTACK TALIBAN .\n\nOTHERWISE JUST IMAGINE , IF THE TALIBAN HAD BEEN ACTUALLY BEHIND THIS THEN THEY WOULD HAVE SURELY CLAIMED THE RESPONSIBILITY .\n\nGEORGE.W.BUSH IS A TRAITOR . HE EVEN FOOLED THE AMERICANS ALSO . JUST LIKE NASA FOOLED THE AMERICANS AND REST OF THE WORLD BY SAYING THAT THEY LANDED ON THE MOON AND SHOWED MANY FAKE VIDEOS .\n\nAMERICANS WILL HAVE REMEMBER ONE THING -- WHATEVER YOU DO -- SOME IS WATCHING IT FROM ABOVE -- GOD .YOU WILL BE PUNISHED .