3=2,    got no correct answer. ask ur mathemeticians. i better put this question in religion and spirituality.
541116
3=2 did get a correct answer...maybe you need to review your rules of square roots.
96099
Your anwser is incorrect.  f (a+1)=3(a+1)+3 First distribute; 3a+3+3 so the anwser is 3a+6!
1067
ummmm... i cant count that high. let me grab my calculator. i calculate 3 as the answer. ;) lol
905278
Cool.  Just recall what our place value number system means.\n\n0 is in the 1s col, so it's absent\n3 is in the 10s col, so c = 1\n1 is in 100s, so a =2\n4 is in 1000s, so d =3\n2 is in 10,000s so b=4
184988
One correction to Duane G's response. When you multiply the bottom by sqrt(3) you get sqrt(3) * sqrt(3) = 3, not 1. Therefore your final answer would be 2 * sqrt(6).
1135408
OH NOES THIS IS LIKE A MATH PROBLEM!!!! i can't handle any more variables :( sry.\n\n\nhahahaha.
684946
find whole (integer) number a,b, and c such that a^3+b^3=c^3.\nDon't remember the answer anymore,but it should be easy - all numbers were less that 10.
269936
4 to the 3rd is 4 multiplied by itself 3 times\n\n4 to the 3rd = 4 x 4 x 4\n\n2 to the 6th = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2
764728
First of all... NEVER tell yourself that you are bad at math.\n\nNow, imagine a pizza that has 3 slices - those are pretty big slices.  Each of the slices is one-third (1/3) of the pizza.\n\nHow many do you need to make two-thirds (2/3)?  That's right, two.\n\nTwo slices of pizza = one slice + another slice = 1/3 + ?... I think you know the answer now.
713177
See my answer to the exact same question asked in the mathematics forum. You have it wrong.
849743
This is the third time that this question has been asked!?!?!\n\nIt's a tough one, too.\n\nI'm taking it to work with me and asking my colleges to help me out on it.\n\nBut someone "did" crack this CHALLENGE Question.\n\nSo here's the answer. . .\n\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvnsMpyNhtwrHV1JVMvXrE4jzKIX?qid=20061130045858AAB57A7\n\nANSWER:  ABCDEFGHJ = 25,693,148\n\nA=2\nB=5 \nC=6\nD=9\nE=7\nF=3\nG=1\nH=4\nJ=8
849885
I understand your frustration in receiving no Answer yet to this question, but since I do not have any direct knowledge of how to perform the calculation(s) you need ... I hope the link below serves you well.  It appears to explain the mathematics behind all the concepts you mention.
840916
i know how it's done. in the theorm, every number is one higher than stated (ex. 1=2, 2=3, 3=4, etc) since it's 2+2, it's actually 3+3. and if 3+3 =6, and 6=7, then the resulting equation is 2+2=7
114500
the way u phrased that doesnt necessarily make sense. x= 2n+1 is 3   ....something along those lines. your wording confused me...my name is my messenegr msg me there and i can try and help
831921
for what,  by 2=3 by 3=2
104805
2+2=1 (mod 3)\n\nNothing is flawed.\nIn natural numbers we always have 2+2=4.\n\nPS.\nJust as a joke for mathematical analysis students:\n2+2=5 for sufficiently large values of 2
674498
1+1=2. That's it. The answer for everything else would be simply 42