Union or Not and why?
538393
Union...so that every employee regardless of rank will be listened to. they will have a voice and they will be well represented.
1012053
honestly? no\n\nit is a civil partership!
257002
It's here to stay, weather we accept it or not.  Personally, I'm opposed to gay marriage but not a gay union.\nI believe gay people are entitled to the same benefits and perks as any other citizen, as long as they're paying their way they should get entitlement.\nThe one area I find confusing is when a gay man will sell himself as a heterosexual for the purpose of marriage with a heterosexual female.  I have had two female acquaintances who have fallen into this trap and found out after tying the knot that their husbands were gay.  In both cases, the marriages ended most ricky- tick.  This was a traumatic experience for both women, one they would never forget!\nSociety is more accepting of homosexuality, today.  There is no logical reason for a homosexual to do this to an un-suspecting person.  Women beware!!!!!
665224
I do not believe there is a wrestling union the promoters would not go for that. that would mean insurance and benefits which there are none.  Most wrestlers work under a contract which is not a lot more than a piece of paper and they have trouble even getting back pay if the promoter voids the contract. Its not stable employment.
217027
I support gay marriage all the way. Civil unions sound like a good way to keep the "sanctity of marriage" while still giving gays equal rights, but actually civil unions only give a portion of the rights that marriage gives and are more easily contested in court by family members. Gays and lesbians would still be denied equality that way. I also think the "sanctity of marriage" argument is bogus, as the definition of marriage not only differs with culture and religion, but has also changed within this country several times over the centuries. See the link for a short and amusing "history of marriage in America."
354494
If the union fails to represent you the best you can do is hire a lawyer for a possible suit against the union.  I'd be concerned though if they don't feel they can support you.  Unions will generally support any member unless there's clear evidence not to.  There's not much "regulation" truly on the part of the union in regards to it's members.  Most issues are contractual and not "legal" issues.  The best the could do is if there were serious problems decertify the union making you non-union workers.  It's sort of lopsided since the business has tons of laws regarding unions, but unions have few laws/restrictions on them. (I'm NOT saying they're bad, just that I feel it's a bit lop-sided)\n\nAlso remember just because you don't like they're decsion they're still representing you, it's more a matter of opinion.  \n\nFinally remember that a union is a BUSINESS and it's main goal is to make money by providing a service (dealing with workers issues).  Also remember that the union is looking out for the union, NOT indivdual persons.  While they'll fight for an employee, if it's better for the union as a whole not to fight they'll generally do that.
1144318
The problem is major major, let me say again MAJOR, propaganda against a union. I used to work for IBM as an engineer (not even affected by a union btw being salaried) and man even if someone was accused of using the 'U' word, they were somehow mysteriously fired.\n\nIf anyone even mentions a union the propaganda KINGS come out in full force. \n\nI wish there would be a massive union spread throughout this country. It would save the good parts of this declining capitalist society.
41758
Ultimately, it is a question of Civil Rights.  Marriage is a secular institution, not always a religious one.  Allowing some citizens to take part while forbiddding others is not different than legal discrimination based on gender or ethnicity.  A marriage union gives the individuals involved special legal, financial, and social rights, and these same rights must be extended to all people, regardless of their sexual orientation.  And, by the way, I am not gay, if that matters.
738856
If I had to choose one of those, I would say to form a more perfect union.  that seems to sort of include the others since it is sort of a vague statement.
408645
My friends, it is solidarity of labor we want. We do not want to find fault with each other, but to solidify our forces and say to each other: "We must be together; our masters are joined together and we must do the same thing."\n\nMother Jones
351493
Joining a union is a contract, which minors are not allowed to go into without parent approval. So if they will allow her to join with a parent cosigning I would recommend it. Even if she moves on to another job later there will be a good mark on her resume for future positions with union employeers.
1158134
How what works, the world? I doubt it although they may have united to become the EU there is no sense of common history or common cause. I don't see too much cooperation in the EU.
587756
The union believes that it can extort resources from a company.  It plays off of people's emotions but doesn't address true economics.  Below is link to their web site, encouraging teachers to instruct our children to become good socialists.\n\nIn spite of the automotive industry, the airline industry, the steel industry, the failed school system(teacher's union), people still believe that a union is the way to go.
45056
They are already united but not in the sense your are talking about. They are too far away from each other to make this possible.
423660
Get a copy of the union's bylaws.  It should be in there.
890323
As I live in England I would like to see this happen ,we English are being denied an identity because we have to call ourselves British.The Scots want to go it alone anyway so as most Scots seem to want to break the union and now more and more English do then I think it's a good idea.However I am talking from an English point of view ,wether the people in Wales and NI want the same I don't know ,But I will only vote for it if we are truly liberated from the other 3 nations and not left to look after N I or Wales .If they stay in the union then we all stay in the union .
617479
Ofcourse yes I will vote for it.\nBut do you know the meaning of marriage?that means union between man and women that they can join together and bear childs to fill the world.how then can guy marry one another?are they gone crazy?are they became beasts?\nits a foolish idea that has even no right to be discussed by human being.\n thank you for good question