when to say me and John vs John and I?
553324
just get rid of the John and if the sentence makes sense use it\nfor example\nJohn and me went to the store.\nnot right\nbecause me went to the store makes no sense.\nJohn and I went to the store is correct.\n\nbut you would say me if it was the direct object of a verb. for example, the car hit john and i is incorrect,\nbecause the car hit i is gibberish.  the car hit me is correct. so the car hit john and me is correct.
108124
Synonyms for "I" depend on the context, and most of them would sound very pretentious. In general, English doesn't have exact synonyms for pronouns.\n\nYou could: myself, the author, the writer
696031
I would use the comma.  In my opinion, it makes more sense to use it to separate God and I.  Also, when being read, the comma can serve as a cue to pause before finishing the sentence.
1132372
I was taught a simple way to know which is correct.  Say the sentence without the other person's name. As in: "Me & Kathy went to the store" becomes: "Me went to the store." Obviously "Me" is incorrect.  Another: "It was a secret known only by me & Kathy". Becomes: "It was a secret known only to me". In this case "me" is correct.\nThis works every time!
591805
Yes, "my dad and me" is correct. "Dad and me" is the object of the verb "brings." One way to check is to substitute either "we" or "us" and determine which one sounds right. In this case, it would be "us," and the correct pronoun would be "me" not "I."
719550
is the question "i am Indian"or "i am an Indian male"?
42108
Strange question.  However, the authors used their own linguistic skills in their writing.  Looks like John was the only one who used truly, truly.
524767
there's a special sentece structure. i don't know the exact format( i don't go memorizing it), but i know that each sentence begins with I am and it describes you by telling something about you. also, the first and last line are like this: I am (your name!).
419607
This answer depends upon the way the words are used.  If you are saying something along the lines of " The answer was clear to him and me." That would be correct since you want to use 'him' and 'me' separately in order to check the accuracy of use. ie. The answer was clear to HIM..  and The answer was clear to ME.  Each works so the original sentence is correct. \nAs for 'you and him', this would be used in a sentence such as "The punishment will apply to you and him". This is correct for the same reason.  Separate the two and see if each works properly.  \nYou will notice that each works with each of these sentences..  It is not always so, such as with 'he and I' or 'me and him'. If you think of each personal pronoun separately, it is not difficult to decide.
470192
There are two ways of saying this : your teachers request, and "john's behaviour".\nIn India, where I live, people often use this horrible way of sayng these things because its more 'proper'. If you want to talk in normal English, everyday American English, use "johns behaviour". Many times people 'forget' that we have apostrophe S, and create a funny type of Enlish by putting 'of'. In french though you have to say "comportement de Jean" which means "behaviour of john". Its best to follow your teacher's way when you are in front of her or are writing something that she will read, but other iwse, use john's behaviour. Or just tell her that you feel more comfortable with normal Apostrophe S.
315813
A.  No --  you and me.\n\nB.  No -- him and me\n\n\nC.  Yes!  I sat between him and her.  Which way is correct:  1)  I sat between they.  2)  I sat between them.\n\nObviously, it's number two.  "Them" is an object pronoun, so that is what is required in the sentence.  "Him" and "her" are object pronouns.\n\nD.  No -- her and me.  Again, substitute:\n\n1)  I hope she will keep this between we.\n\n2)  I hope she will keep this between us.\n\nIs that any clearer?
101701
I am sorry but the question is not clear me.\nIt is grammatically incorrect to say 'me sells'.
41639
"for me" sounds like u r trying to adapt to the school\n"to me" sounds like the school is trying to adapt to u\ni choose "for me"
1009528
Here's the easy way to tell.  Instead of "who" and "whom" try substituting "he" and "him" into the same sentence.  If "he" works better, than you want "who" if "him" works better, then you want "whom".\n\nFor example, let's say you're trying to figure out whether it's "To who am I speaking" or "To whom am I speaking".  Would you say (this is a little Yoda-like but that's okay) "To he am I speaking" or "To him am I speaking"?  The second sounds more correct, so it would be "To whom am I speaking?"
394956
C is correct. "between" is a preposition and begins a prepositional phrase which ends with a noun or pronoun called the object of the preposition. Therefore, the objective case (form) of the personal pronoun (me, him, her, us, them) and NOT the nominative case (form) of the personal pronoun (I, he, she, we, they)follows a prepositon.\n\nI hope this helps you.
105251
To choose correctly among the forms of who, re-phrase the sentence so you choose between he and him. If you want him, write whom; if you want he, write who. \n\nWho do you think is responsible? (Do you think he is responsible?) \nWhom shall we ask to the party? (Shall we ask him to the party?) \nGive the box to whomever you please. (Give the box to him.) \nGive the box to whoever seems to want it most. (He seems to want it most. [And then the clause "whoever seems to want it most" is the object of the preposition "to."]) \nWhoever shows up first will win the prize. (He shows up first.) \nThe only problem most writers have with whose is confusing it with who's, which looks like a possessive but is really the contraction for who is. In the same way that we should not confuse his with he's (the contraction for he is or he has), we should not confuse whose with who's. \n\nWho's that walking down the street?\nWhose coat is this?\nI don't care whose paper this is. It's brilliant!\nWhose can be used to refer to inanimate objects as well as to people (although there is a kind of folk belief that it should refer only to humans and other mammals): "I remember reading a book — whose title I can't recall right now — about a boy and a basenji."
451258
Depends on the sentence.\n\n"Peter and I" is a subject, so it is used in the appropriate case:  "Peter and I went to the store." (Peter &I=subject)\n\n"Peter and me" is an object, so it is used thus:  "Do you want to come to the store with Peter and me?" (you=subject; Peter&me=object)\n\nTry this as a useful rule of thumb:  pretend Peter isn't part of the equation (the proper noun portion of the phrase) and focus on what the correct grammar would be for the pronoun portion of the phrase (You wouldn't say "Me am going to the store," or "Do you want to come to the store with I"--that's your key).