does anyone hsve any info on titanic two resurface?
544635
There's not such movie to be relased. That's a joke.\n\nIf you go the link titled 'about the creator/editor', you can read:\n\n "Hello!" to everyone taking interest in who I am. My real name isn’t Derek Johnson—that is a pen name that I decided to use for this project. My real name is Robert Blankenheim. I am 25 years old, reside in Los Angeles, CA, and am a graduate of Chapman University. I came up with this Titanic parody trailer idea over five years ago, but at the time I wasn't technically able to create it. In the past five years I have learnt how to use programs such as Adobe After Effects and Lightwave and they have helped me to transform my trailer idea into a reality.\n\nThis trailer was entirely of my own making—including the editing and the visual effects. It took 23 films and months and months of work, but I finally released it on April 3rd. Since then it has been viewed over 1.5 million times—more than I could ever have imagined! On one hand I wish I could have released it 5 years ago to beat the whole “mashup trailer” boom, but then again, I wouldn’t have had as much DiCaprio footage to cut from. So in the end I guess it was better that I waited. '
247108
When I started this project, I had no idea how big it would get. I figured that I would just use a few of my reference books on naval ships so that people on the Netnews group rec.arts.startrek.misc would ask fewer uninformed questions about naval history. I used to post it regularly to that newsgroup, until Joe Creighton offered to put it on his "Star Trek Archive" web site. (April 1995) The hit rate astonished me! People were really reading this stuff! Anyhow, people started e-mailing me with additional information, suggestions for improvements, etc. It got to be a bit overwhelming. Now I'm finding that it's not just Star Trek fans who are interested. I'm now finding links to this site on real naval history sites! I suppose I should point out to any legitimate naval historians out there that this was originally designed for fans of the various Star Trek television series, and so references to future history (23rd & 24th centuries) and an obscure incedent aboard CVN-65 in 1986 involving one Pavel Chekov are of course, fiction. I was also a bit sloppier about references than I should have been. When I started this, I was doing it for a (then) small community of Star Trek fans on the Internet, and I wasn't really planning on it being an academic work with footnotes and references. Some things got lost in the shuffle, and probably a few errors have crept in during transcription. Nevertheless, I've tried to at least list my sources, and thank those who have contributed. Thanks for reading! \n\n\n1705 - 1707 6th Rate Vessel. (UK) \n\nLength: 110 feet \nBeam: 28 feet \nDraught: 15 feet \nCompliment: 115 \nArmament of 24 guns \nDisplacement: 320 tons. \nPreviously French vessel L'Enterprise before her capture in May of 1705. Served in the Mediterranean under command of J. Paul. May 19, 1707, her new captain takes command, W. Davenport, and she saw action off of Leghorn, (Livorno) Italy. She wrecked on October 12, 1707 off of Thornton. \n\nSource: \n\nHistory of the Vessel Enterprise \nBack to Top \n\n\n1709-1749 5th Rate Vessel. (UK) \n"HMS Enterprize" (sic) \nLength: 118 feet \nBeam: 32 feet \nCompliment: 190 \nArmament: 40 guns \nDisplacement: 531 tons \n4 April 1709, built at Lock, Plymouth, England. \n\n28 April 1709: Completed and launched on \n\n1709-1712: patrolled the Virginia under command of Nicholas Smith. \n\nJune 1711: expedition to St.Lawrence under Rear Admiral Sir Hovenden Walker. \n\n1712-1718: Patrolled home waters from 1712 to 1718. \n\n1718: undertook a major repair and refit. \n\n1719: destroyed depot formed at Donan Castle by the Spanish expedition to the coast of Scotland. \n\nOctober 1719: capture of Vigo by Vice Admiral Mighells. \n\n1721-1724: Patrolled off of Virginia again. \n\n20 February 1740: Renamed Liverpool, a hospital ship. \n\nSeptember 1745: decommissioned. \n\n3 April 1749: sold off for 280 pounds. \n\nSource: \n\nHistory of the Vessel Enterprise \nBack to Top \n\n\n1730-1764 sloop (UK) \nUsed in War of Austrian Succession and Seven Years War. Broken up in 1764. \n\nSource: \n\nHistory of the Vessel Enterprise \nBack to Top \n\n\n1738 - Enterprize, \nSmall wooden English Private passenger vessel. The following is a German translation of an immigrant registration for German and Swiss immigrants leaving for America via England, bound for the Philadelphia ports to live in Pennsylvania:" December 6, 1738, Palatines imported in the snow Enterprize, Lynell Wood Master, from London, 120 passengers." \n\nSource: \n\nHistory of the Vessel Enterprise \nBack to Top \n\n\n1743-1748 Eight Gunned Sloop. (UK) \n"HMS Enterprize" (sic) \n\nPatrolled the Mediterranean under the command of T. Henning. \n\n11 February 1744: took part in the Battle of Toulon. \n\n1748: Sold \n\nSource: \n\nHistory of the Vessel Enterprise \nBack to Top \n\n\n1759 - ? Frigate. (France) \n\n" L'Entreprise" (sic) \n\nSource: \n\nHistory of the Vessel Enterpri
75795
Titanic!\n\ndont u wanna c it once again.. everytime it comes on television??
317646
Although it sickens me to say, but it is from the worste movie in the world, Titanic.  it possitively makes me want to heave every time i see the front cover in my mum's collection
1178471
Yup, still there. There was a documentary last year about the Bermuda triangle. In it they showed what's down there...lots of  war planes and ships that disappeared during the WW II. Maybe they will show it again. They came up with an explanation on how the disappearances came to be. Apparently the substances (sulfur etc) spewed out  underwater from the earth's center,  cause the mechanics of the planes and ships to malfunction.
256181
This site lists people who survived the Titanic who might still be alive today: http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/trousers/57/survivors.html#\n\n\nAccording to the BBC around 705 people survived the Titanic. That could mean that thousands of people today are related to a Titanic survivor. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1927996.stm\n\nThis story shows how some relatives of someone lost in the Titanic found only recently found out where their relative was finally laid to rest: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4379580.stm\n\nBut surely the best general Titanic resource online is the Wikipedia entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Titanic
168948
The fashions in the movie reflect the fashions of the time of the Titanic. If you look up "Edwardian fashion" you should see similar clothing.  ("Titanic era Fashion" will work, too, as the movie has created a lot of interest in costumes of that period) Sounds like a fun project! Enjoy!
18307
Titanic was the second of three ships built by the White Star Line, the first being the Olympic and the third named Britanic (orginally Gigantic).  They were built side by side at Harland and Wolff in Belfast.  The Titanic's first and last launch left first from Southhampton, England.
509191
Well in the movie when he first meets rose he tells her about his life before his parents died. He said he used to live in Wisconsin. I KNOW it is, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin.\nI hope i helped you! any more questions about the movie or about the historical event i can help. I AM OBSESSED WITH TITANIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
790864
Titanic! King Kong was too Long (yawns)
392642
Here are a couple of links:\n\nhttp://www.nzmaritime.co.nz/amokura.htm\n\nhttp://www.simplyhifi.com.au/HMS_Sparrow_10_2.jpg
978808
Wow - I was wondering when someone would resurrect this... it's old news, I'm afraid. Here's one of many web sites, too...\n\nhttp://www.aip.org/isns/reports/2002/058.html
104388
Found this article from just two weeks ago, explaining that although a sequel is highly probable, they're in preliminary talks at the moment so nothing is official.\n\nI can bet money there will be one.
435386
At the current rate of rusting of the Titanic, in about 50 years there won't be much of the ship left. Right now the so called gold it has in it is in the lower holds. They cannot be gotten too. If they could, the french company that has been diving on and looting it, would have gotten it already. When the ship is all rusted away the gold should be sitting in the open, ready for the taking.\n\nGood luck.
399823
it is an interesting question and one where i would imagine you would be more likely to get answers dealing with the descendants of George Curzon as i imagine after the bolshivik revolution the diaries of Alexandra would have been burnt.if you read Boswells london journals i am sure you will find the preface very interesting because it tells of a similar story in recuperating the diary.keep in touch and good luck.
1071171
Not many people are alive today that were at Pearl Harbor and I believe that the last survivor of the Titanic died recently.  \n\nThe first movie about the Titanic didn't come out until 1943.\n\nI think the fact that 9/11 was a terrorist attack on our own homeland soil is the reason it is such a touchy subject.
980845
Sorry I don't know the first thing about icebergs, but hope these sites help you!\n\nhttp://www.wordplay.com/tourism/icebergs/\nhttp://www.spri.cam.ac.uk/library/pictures/gallery/ice.html\nhttp://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Rapids/4233/ijsbergen.htm\nhttp://www.natice.noaa.gov/products/iceberg/\n\nAnd for info on the Titanic see:\nhttp://www.titanic-titanic.com/icebergs.shtml