prejudicial and subjective?
548340
truth is we dont need to educate ourselves to know if an opinion is biased or not because all opinions are subjective and prejudicial (that's why it's called an opinion. otherwise, it would have been called a fact)
666300
Subjective means that you're adding your personal feelings and experiances when looking at a topic.  When you look at something objectivily you're looking at just the facts and nothing else.  You will or should have delt with objective, and subjective writing in high school--or college.
150211
The right to exist, freedom of speech, and desire for happiness
827755
EXAMPLE:\n\n  " The husband alleged, that his wife put poison in his food"\n\n(meaning it could be false, usually one person's word)\n\n"The police alleged, that the defendant had a gun in his hand."
220341
Not Here *L*\n\nObjective information can only be gained by thoroughly researching the topic.\nAll points of views are biased, so you need a few to sort out fact from fiction.
208046
There is a clash of terms, as mentioned above. \n\nHowever, if you interchange the synonym 'factually' with 'objectively', you may then be able to fit the idea together a bit better.\n\nFor example, your persuasive topic, obviously, is your subjective stance. For sake of credibility, accuracy and strength, your argument should be supported with information that is as factual, or objective, as possible.
266425
You have to look at the entire pleading in context.  Unless the pleading is verified under penalty of perjury, none of the allegations can be grounds for perjury.  Furthermore, you need to look at the specific nature of the allegations and the qualifiers.  If the declaration alleges something based on "information and belief" as opposed to personal knowledge, that doesn't support a charge of perjury if determined to be false.  Finally, the phrase "believes and avers" might have a specific meaning under the laws of your state that might be unique.
475937
There is an excellent resource regarding both.  But I agree with the idea that since ID isn't scientific, (As ruled by Judges Jones in the Kilmitzer vs Dover trial 2004), then it should be a tad bit one sided.\n\nCheck out the sources listed below for in-depth info.
1050037
I saw a show on thirteen world about this topic, it is very interesting. \nIt should vary from case to case. If someone found evidence of prior  hate or bad thoughts and such for the victim of the crime, they should have a some jail time, but even if they commited murder, it is  not wise to put them to jail because they were unconcious. If you can prove that they were concious that in fact changes everything. Judges should handle this with thought. I Disagree with everyone else because subconsious movement may be a sickness.
17593
Presumption - an assumption that is taken for granted\n\nAssumption - a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn; "on the assumption that he has been injured we can infer that he will not to play"
760338
There is an intrinsic difference between the 2 statements. I am a mechanical engineer and know that a surface can seem to be smooth and feel like it is when in fact it isn`t. The word "is" is  positive and the word "seems" is subjective so both sentences are correct.
617491
Satisfying basic needs brings contentment, but 'good' is a very subjective term. One mans 'goodness' is another mans interference. Most people prefer to have what they need and then determine their own subsequent conduct and beliefs.
552415
it depends on individual opinions
1030583
if you can, go through 3rd party sources, i.e. the BBC or something like that. There aren't too many places in this country that are objective anymore, so there is likely to be a bias to most of what you find concerning them. Good luck, and don't believe anyone's spin, learn everything for yourself. Never trust a politition.
1144166
Kohlberg proposes that people pass through 3 stages of moral development.  Preconventional, where morality is determined by what the person has reinforced to them (i.e. if I take the cookie, mommy spanks me, therefore taking cookies is bad).  Conventional, where morality is determined by what the person learns about society and rules of behavior (i.e. if I take the cookie, that's stealing, and stealing is wrong).  And Postconventional, where a person develops their own morality through reasoning (i.e. If i take a cookie to give to my dying mother and the value of the cookie is $0.50, that's morally acceptable).  There are problems with Kohlberg's theory, mainly that there is evidence suggesting that people operate at all 3 levels, depending on situation.
276484
There is no general "classification". The view of a "good person" is as individual the individual himself. You have to make up your own mind as to what that is, as does everybody. There is really no point in just grasping the sociological standard of any opinion, including what can be classified as a good person.
707495
Do not be subjective--meaning do not use words like I, My Me, Us, etc. In simple terms, Instead of saying I like this book, say this book is good because. Do not personalize the subject, if you have a personal attachment to it, stay objective and do not let your own personal bias show in your work. Keep it professional.