what are the Safty Aspects of labelling Chemicals?
548327
You have to know what chemical it is and what to do in case of skin contact, ingestion,etc..Also there should be the manufactures info. and contact info. just in case of emergency.  Hello!!
450615
Any of the heavy metals, or benzene products would be excellent topics. If you attempt to present a case on a chemical that's too obscure you'll have a difficult time finding enough research/clinical trials to support your claim. Peruse the EPA website to get some other ideas.
630453
Corrosive liquids such as aldehydes, amides etc.
968993
Color, shape, hardness, melting point, boiling point, density
371080
Organometallics are very important in pharmaceuticals.\nThey can be used to make synthetic haemoglobin which is used to transport oxygen around in the blood stream.
889022
sterics help the water to attack the central carbonyl, as the other 2 are crowded by the phenyl ring. and with the electronics of the system the central carbonyl is the most electropositive making it a great target for nucleophilic addition
331784
Vaseline\nSolvents used in paint\nlubricating oils\nGrease\nAsphalt\nVariety of Plastics\n... and many more, can't think of them all.
552698
you have to be exact what you mean by names\n\nb-cuz a label is a name but than the names can be info in the chart, table or/and graph
896143
ALWAYS read the label and the MSDS of any chemical whenever you first use it or when you reuse it.  Everything has some toxicity.  BTW, if you haven't been trained on how to interpret an MSDS or chemical label, you have no place in a lab.\n\nIn the case of an alkane solvent such as pet ether, acute exposure can lead to intoxication (dizziness, fainting, blurred vision).  Chronic exposure can lead to nerve and brain lesions.  MSDS for pet ether is linked.\n\nIf you're job requires you to handle large amounts of this stuff outside a hood, there's a problem.  If you feel that you're in harm's way, talk to your supervisor about it.  If they don't satisfy you by measuring your exposure and determining it to be less than the TWA, go to the next level of management or the Safety Officer (if there is one).  If they fire you for being a trouble-maker, you're better off on the outside of company like that.  Then, do us all a favor and contact OSHA (link provided).  [I'm assuming you work in the USA and maybe that's not so.  You'll have to find equivalent resources if you don't.]\n\nYour health is worth a lot more than doing entry level work for an unsafe employer.\n\nGood luck.
125676
a fairly lengthy description can be found at\n\nhttp://apps3.fao.org/jecfa/additive_specs/docs/0/additive-0465.htm
738985
physical methods of separation; distillation, filtration, centrifugation, etc.\nChemical methods: sublimation, crystallization,  chromatography (actually, a combination of the chemical properties of the solubilty of the item in solution, and physical separation of stubstances via filter paper)
285473
Subject for the paper would be good. Chemistry would be different from business administration.
613653
Read the label.  It has to list all ingredients.
324957
I would need more information about the chemicals in the factory, but...\n\nThis would include a regular check of temp charts, against approved limits and stock rotation etc.
1005052
Typically you can do most regular organic chemistry reactions with radiolabelled substrates. So for instance\n\nacetaldehyde + NaT4 -> CH3CTHOH\n\nCH3CTHOH + Na(129)I -> CH3CTH(129)I would work
537610
there are an unlimited number of chemicals possible...\nthere is not currently a single list of every chemical known to man.
655270
Titrations are always cool.  The color changes offer a visual aspect.  Just make sure that you know what the titration is really measuring.\n\nThe key to a good science project is stating a good hypothesis and then explaining WHY you think the hypothesis is true.  Then design the experiment that will test the hypothesis.  Be sure to include a control so you know that you are measuring the right thing.  Then analyze the data and determine if they hypothesis was supported or not.  Besure to explain WHY or WHY NOT which ever the outcome is.