conventional bomb blast effect?
539598
Concussions, loss of hearing, shrapnel, bruises and broken bones, burns obviously, caterized wounds, dizzy vision, loss of balance...
700411
Fireworks are not true explosives.  They deflagrate rather than detonate.  The stars just burn.\n\nSome examples:\nFlash Powder\nBlackpowder of varying formulas and grain sizes.\nKP\nWhistle Mix
413598
blackpowder or gunpowder exploding makes the cracle sound. they just put it in smaller sections so it wont be as loud
102608
They range in power. About 100 megaton of TNT. The radiation from the bomb also kills.
511763
IMPACT EXPLOSIVES\n\n     Impact explosives are often used as primers.  Of the ones discussed here, only mercury fulminate and nitroglycerine are real explosives; Ammonium triiodide crystals decompose upon impact, but they release little heat and no light.  Impact explosives are always treated with the greatest care, and even the stupidest anarchist never stores them near any high or low explosives.\nCARBIDE BOMB\n\nThis is EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. Exercise extreme caution.... Obtain some calcium\ncarbide. This is the stuff that is used in carbide lamps and can be found at\nnearly any hardware store.\n    Take a few pieces of this stuff (it looks like gravel) and put it in a\nglass jar with some water. Put a lid on tightly. The carbide will react with\nthe water to produce acetylene carbonate which is similar to the gas used in\ncutting torches.\n    Eventually the glass with explode from internal pressure. If you leave a\nburning rag nearby, you will get a nice fireball!\nSMOKE BOMBS\n\n     One type of pyrotechnic device that might be employed by a terrorist in\nmany way would be a smoke bomb.  Such a device could conceal the getaway\nroute, or cause a diversion, or simply provide cover.  Such a device, were it\nto produce enough smoke that smelled bad enough, could force the evacuation of\na building, for example.  Smoke bombs are not difficult to make.  Although the\nmilitary smoke bombs employ powdered white phosphorus or titanium compounds,\nsuch materials are usually unavailable to even the most well-equipped\nterrorist. Instead, he/she would have to make the smoke bomb for themselves.\n\n     Most homemade smoke bombs usually employ some type of base powder, such as\nblack powder or pyrodex, to support combustion.  The base material will burn\nwell, and provide heat to cause the other materials in the device to burn, but\nnot completely or cleanly.  Table sugar, mixed with sulfur and a base material,\nproduces large amounts of smoke.  Sawdust, especially if it has a small amount\nof oil in it, and a base powder works well also.  Other excellent smoke\ningredients are small pieces of rubber, finely ground plastics, and many\nchemical mixtures.  The material in road flares can be mixed with sugar and\nsulfur and a base powder produces much smoke.  Most of the fuel-oxodizer\nmixtures, if the ratio is not correct, produce much smoke when added to a base\npowder.  The list of possibilities goes on and on.  The trick to a successful\nsmoke bomb also lies in the container used.  A plastic cylinder works well, and\ncontributes to the smoke produced.  The hole in the smoke bomb where the fuse\nenters must be large enough to allow the material to burn without causing an\nexplosion.  This is another plus for plastic containers, since they will melt\nand burn when the smoke material ignites, producing an opening large enough to\nprevent an explosion.\n\nSIMPLE SMOKE/STINK BOMB \n\n       Simple smoke/stink bomb- you can purchaase sulphur at a drugstore under\nthe name flowers of sulphur.  now when sulphur burns it will give off a very\nstrong odor and plenty of smoke.  now all you need is a fuse from a\nfirecracker, a tin can, and the sulphur.  fill the can with sulphur(pack very\nlightly), put aluninum foil over the top of the can, poke a small hole into\nthe foil, insert the wick, and light it and get out of the room if you value\nyour lungs.  you can find many uses for this (or at least i hope so).\n\n\nSIMPLE SMOKE BOMB\n\nNeeded :\n\n Sugar\n\n Epson Salts\n\n 1.)  Mix the ingredients, 3 parts sugar, 6 parts epson salts.\n\n 2.)  Put the mixture in a tin container and heat it with a lighter.\n\n 3.)  When it has turned into a gel, put a fuse in it (a match will do).\n\n 4.)  Let the gel harden.\n\n\n5.13        SMOKE SMOKE SMOKE...\n\n  The following reaction should produce a fair amount of smoke.  Since this\n reaction is not all that dangerous you can use larger amounts if necessary\n\n 6 pt. ZINC POWDER\n 1 pt. SULFUR POWDER\n
248470
probably explode or though im not sure,it would be fun if it hit someone ,just kidding,he,he
1026592
EMP is a side-effect to nuclear explosions.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse\nHere is how you can build your own nuclear device.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_bomb\n\nGood luck. Just hope you are not living near me.
408350
Ummm I am not sure what you are asking. Are you asking if TNT produces radiation? if so then, No there is no radioactive fallout from TNT.\n\nBut if you are asking if TNT can cause the same destructive damage as a nuclear bomb (without the radiation damage) then yes. that is why they measure it against TNT so we have an idea of how destructive it is.
902022
I've seen planes explode when a bullet goes through a window in movies too.  That doesn't make it true.
292582
In a 2-megaton explosion over a fairly large city, buildings would be vaporized, people reduced to atoms and shadows, outlying structures blown down like matchsticks and raging fires ignited. And if the bomb were exploded on the ground, an enormous crater, like those that can be seen through a telescope on the surface of the Moon, would be all that remained where midtown once had been. \n\nThere are now more than 50,000 nuclear weapons, more than 13,000 megatons of yield, deployed in the arsenals of the United States and the Soviet Union -- enough to obliterate a million Hiroshimas. \n\nBut there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Thus, there are vastly more nuclear weapons than are needed for any plausible deterrence of a potential adversary.
1145071
Khrushchev warned in a filmed speech to the Communist parliament of the existence of a 100 Mt bomb. \nThe Bomb called the Tsar was dropped from a TU 95 at a height of 10.500 metres using a parachute drop.The fireball touched the ground, reached nearly as high as the altitude of the release plane10,500 metres, and was seen 1,000 km away. The heat could have caused third degree burns at a distance of 100 km. The subsequent mushroom cloud was about 60 km high and 30–40 km wide. The explosion could be seen and felt in Finland, even breaking windows there.[citation needed] Atmospheric focusing caused blast damage up to 1,000 km away. The seismic shock created by the detonation was measurable even on its third passage around the earth.
72587
There are several different ways the bomb damages surroundings, depending on the distance from ground zero:\n\n1. Nearest the bomb explosion, severe heat vaporizes everything.\n2. Nuclear radiation moves out from the epicenter.\n3. Pressure shock-waves also move out from the epicenter, knocking down structures.\n4. Fallout comes down from the skies, coating everything.
274829
Mythbusters did an experiment on this...\n\nFrom their website....\nEpisode 23: Exploding House\nJust how hard is it to find a needle in a haystack? Egos fly as the MythBusters get competitive creating the supreme needle-finding machine. Then, returning to their familiar territory of blowing stuff up in the name of science, Jamie and Adam arm themselves with roach foggers and an abandoned apartment building to find out if toxic fumes and bug bombs really are an explosive combination. Finally, the MythBuilders hit the roof to prove whether or not whispering sweet nothings to your plants is the secret to gardening success.\npremiere: Nov. 16, 2004\n\nThey actually found that playing hard rock was better than classical. (something to do with bass?) And all forms of music and talking are better than no noise at all. Based on what they learned and what I saw on the show I don't think it's the emotions persay but the sound itself....
329259
depends on the type and country. thrown explosives or incendiary devices
85380
bomb is an explosive device which, although not containing more energy than ordinary fuel (except in the case of a nuclear weapon), generates and releases its energy very rapidly, as a violent, destructive shock wave. It is usually some kind of container filled with explosive material, designed to cause random destruction when set off. The word comes from the Greek βόμβος (bombos), an onomatopoetic term with approximately the same meaning as "boom" in English.\n\nThese are first and foremost weapons; the term "bomb" is not usually applied to explosive devices used for civilian purposes (such as construction or mining), although the people using the devices may or may not sometimes refer to them as bombs. Note that many military explosive devices are not called "bombs". The military mostly calls airdropped, unpowered explosive weapons "bombs," and such bombs are normally used by air forces and naval aviation. Other military explosive devices are called grenades (such as hand grenades), shells, depth charges, warheads (in missiles), or land mines.\n\nThey have been used for centuries in warfare and are a central part of the terrorist's arsenal. They fall into three distinct categories: conventional (filled with chemical explosives), dispersive (filled with submunitions, chemicals or other disruptive agents which are spread on or shortly before impact) or nuclear (relying on nuclear fission or nuclear fusion for their effect).\n\n \nDevice originally thought to be a pipe bomb, found to be a time bomb. From a U.S. government publication.A distinction is commonly drawn between terrorist and military bombs. The latter are almost always mass-produced weapons, developed and constructed to a standard design out of standard components and intended to be deployed in a standard way each time. By contrast, terrorist bombs are usually custom-made, developed to any number of designs, use a wide range of explosives of varying levels of power and chemical stability, and are used in many different ways. For this reason, they are generally referred to as improvised explosive devices or IEDs.\n\nThe most powerful bomb in existence is the hydrogen bomb, a nuclear weapon. The most powerful bombs ever used in combat were the two nuclear bombs dropped by the United States to attack Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The most powerful non-nuclear bomb is the United States Air Force's MOAB (Massive Ordnance Air Blast).\n\nThe most powerful bomb ever was Tsar Bomba: ca. 50 Mt; it had a mass of 27 tons; it was dropped from a bomber for a test, but was for various reasons not very suitable for combat.\n\nThe first hydrogen bomb Ivy Mike (10.4 Mt) was even heavier in mass, 82 tons. It was too heavy to be deliverable by a plane or rocket, and therefore not very suitable for an attack.
694161
Whoa, let's sort out this question, you're actually talking about several different things.  First of all, yes, the entire electromagnetic spectrum involves the electromotive force.  But electrons themselves are not examples of the electromagnetic spectrum, even though in quantum theory they are represented by waves.  Certain particles, such as neutrinos, which are now suspected to have mass, do in fact pass through our bodies "harmlessly", because 1) they are uncharged, and 2) their mode of interaction with matter through the electroweak force makes it extremely rare that they would actually "collide" with anything.  Now, exploding bombs that produce shock waves that damages our bodies, again, are not examples of the electromotive force in action, but ordinary air being compressed and moving along like sound waves.  The speed, in fact, is the speed of sound.  What makes an explosion destructive is the degree of overpressure, or pressure differential, across the shock wave.  And destruction to bodies by this overpressure occurs so rapidly, it's not really a matter of friction, but more by net mechanical force.  Now, it's possible to damage or kill people using electromagnetic waves, which is the theory behind high energy focused microwaves, or even lasers, but this time it's a matter of absorption of energy, rather than a mechanical interaction as with shock waves from ordinary explosions.
812216
bombardment does mean a collision\nblast means explosion\na bombardment may lead to blast