When will the IEEE complete the 802.11n standard draft?
542693
How long is a ball of string. See the link below for some review dates.\nSee the second link about a commercial org view point.
1085280
The most recent issue of IEEE transactions (2006, v.14, issue 4) is devoted to VLSI. The major specialization areas it cites are: systems specifications, design and partitioning, high performance computing and communication systems, neural networks, wafer-scale integration and multichip module systems and their applications.\n\nBesides the articles in this journal, there are a number of websites detailing VLSI conferences, journals, and professiona organizations. I would look through these sources for "State of the Industry" reports. Wikipedia and IEEE maintain a list of up-to-date links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-large-scale_integration\nhttp://www.ieee.org/portal/pages/society/eds/technical_committees/vlsi/links.html
139999
Didn't you ask this same question yesterday?  If there were no standards, then parts wouldn't be interchangeable.  Also, for LAN standards, do a search on TCP/IP subnetting.
985584
Try this link\nhttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/prod_release_note09186a00802d398a.html#wp1266733\n\nand try the rest of that page, also
739993
It is already announced today i.e on 2nd December 2006 at 3 PM.\nAll the best.
831695
hey jessy it is in latestdumps.com u didnt see it haaa...\n\ncheck it out latest cbt for CCNA and also testout\n\nhttp://www.latestdumps.com/forum2/index.php/topic,250.0.html
872314
i'm in isce for 2007 ---even i cant understand the time table---they say its gonna be 14th of feb!
1164202
tomorrow (june 16 EDT)
311907
the draft is set to start at noon ET
846907
This is specific knowledge for electrical and computer engineering.  If you want to know about it you can sign-up for IEEE explore\nhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/10095/32328/01509649.pdf?arnumber=1509649
1148303
They will be announced on August 22, 2006. \n\nGood luck!
1081811
Comparing WiMax to WiFi is akin to comparing apples to oranges. Initially it’s easy to see why the comparison would exist, as most people think WiMax is merely a more robust version of WiFi. Indeed they are both wireless broadband technologies, but they differ in the technical execution and ultimately their business case is very different. In addition to the technical differences that exist, the marketplace difference is that equipment is more or less non-existent for WiMax and certainly not geared towards a residential environment with very high pricing to be expected. It will take at least 2 years to see equipment of mass market uptake pricing. \n\nWiMax will not be commercially available until the second half of 2005, and even then at a very controlled level. This is primarily due to standardization issues. In fact, it won’t be until 2006 that a robust production and implementation will happen due to the ramp-up period for manufacturers. This is certainly one challenge to the widespread adoption of WiMax. Additionally, WiMax will have issues of pricing, and will remain far more expensive than WiFi. WiMax will be primarily adopted by businesses to replace or displace DSL, and offices that want to cover a lot of territory without entering the world of endless repeaters that are necessary with the 802.11 technologies. It will take some time (2 years) for WiMax to significantly reduce its price-point for residential uptake.  WiMax will not displace WiFi in the home because WiFi is advancing in terms of speed and technology. Each year brings a new variant to the 802.11 area with various improvements. \n\nAdditionally, for commercial deployment, frequency allocation will be an issue. With the three dominant communications players controlling the best frequencies, it will be hard to get the type of traction needed with the remaining companies operating in the frequencies available. WiMax will become extremely robust and displace WiFi as the deployment of choice for commercial deployments, but that won’t even begin until the end of 2006. Based upon the number of public hotspots already deployed, WiMax will not be chosen to replace those as they are up and running adequately and personnel involved understand how to work with the technology. The business case does not exist at the hotspot level. Where it may exist is for wider free use deployments such as city deployments (free ones) and other government sponsored or carrier sponsored (with ultra inexpensive pricing for consumers) deployments. If this happens then its not only WiFi that will be displaced, but cable and DSL will also lose a percentage of their subscriber base. What will cause the displacement is the consumer’s proven desire for a bundled package.
340902
WiMAX is Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access.  There is a standard for fixed and nomadic locations called IEEE 802.16d-2004 and for mobile IEEE 802.16e-2005.  Mobile is define as moving up to 250 km per hour.\n\nSee the link below for the standard ...
352289
The official language standard was updated a few years ago\nby both ANSI and ISO, to what is referred to as the "C99" standard.\nTo even be close to current, you'll want to be aware of the\nchanges made there.  You should be able to buy an electronic\ncopy from http://webstore.ansi.org or a hardcopy book from\nthe normal places (like amazon.com).\n\nConsiderably more current, however, will be what you find at\nthe ISO working group home page:\n\n    http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/\n\nHere you'll find the text of the existing defect reports,\ntechnical corrigendums, proposals for changes, as well as\nthe text of the rationale (which explains *why* certain\nstandards decisions were made).\n\nOne other source for both proposals for future changes as well\nas explanation of historical issues is:\n\n    http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/
78853
It is IEEE standard 754. See the link below to see exactly the details of how to apply this standard.
608
Many organizations utilize wireless local area networks (WLAN) because of their convenience. The trade-off made is convenience for speed. Today’s most advanced wireless standard, IEEE 802.11g, operates at roughly half the speed of the most common 100 Mbit/s wired LAN. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) began to address this speed differential in the middle of 2003. Their vision was IEEE 802.11n, which would provide speeds equal to or greater than 100 Mbit/s LANs. Their work has yet to be completed. The lack of approval has led some to release so-called Pre-N equipment, which seeks to give the benefits of the 802.11n standard without an official standard. Because there is no official standard, implementing these products has future implications to customers.\n\n\nStandards\n\nStandards are made for very specific reasons. Foremost, they ensure that devices can operate with devices made by other manufacturers. Essentially, when a company releases a product before the ratification of the standard, they must infer what the IEEE is going to set. These inferences mean that the product may be incompatible with the final standard. If this does occur, an organization may be locked in to purchasing only identical hardware to that which they own. This would ensure compatibility.\n\n\nImplications\n\nAnother possibility if incompatibility exists is the release of an upgrade. The company would not be required to release updates, but if it did, there would be considerable work for the support groups. This may include individually upgrading each device, a very time consuming proposition. Despite the time commitment, an upgrade would be the most responsible course of action for the company because the customers would be able to choose any 802.11n solution for their purposes.\n\n\nImplementation\n\nIf an organization chooses to implement the Pre-N technology, the theory is the same as previous wireless network implementations. The setup would most likely begin with a router. This would be hard-wired to the Internet connection. There are also wired ports on the rear of the router. These allow any wired device to be included on the network. The router would then provide access to any device in its range with a compatible network interface card (NIC.) Currently, NICs exist for both desktop computers and notebook computers.\n\n\nAdvantages/Conclusions\n\nThe advantages to using this technology are clear. It will allow computers to connect easily to wireless networks, without sacrificing the speed possible with a wired connection. Another concern that comes up is that gigabit Ethernet is also available. If an organization were to implement this, 802.11n would again be just one-tenth of the speed. The implementation of any wireless network must be carefully considered. Regardless of which standard is followed, the security threats are common. Data is still being broadcast over radio frequencies. Before deciding whether to use Pre-N technology, one must first decide whether wireless is appropriate for their application. Only then should 802.11n be considered.
1182935
http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/C/C96/C96-2183.pdf