TO housewrkrm i use my brain so i ask my question because i didnt see any achievement in iraq ,can u see?
552544
No, I see no progress in Iraq. I see no evidence that you use your brain much either. You should be ashamed of your bad spelling and grammer.
1003802
Well I am not the brain dead yet, to where I can take on two subjects. Whats the matter your brain can only function on the war.
708137
I'd say a Pyyhric victory is still possible, but only if we can muster enough troops and descend on Iraq in sufficient force to close and control the borders,then clean it up from the inside out.  We need to acknowledge to our allies that we really messed up, and ask for help.  They may not give it, but we need to try.  Walking away and leaving such a monumental disaster of our making is utterly dishonorable.  Bush and his supporters made a terrible mistake, and it's much too late to do anything about that, but we should not simply throw up our hands and leave Iraq to its fate.
377386
I'm embarassed.\n\nFirst of all--we lied to start a war that was not provoked against us.  It was actually nice having one country in the world that didn't kiss our butts and tell us what we wanted to hear.  I am in favor of free speech.  I believe Saddam Hussein became a target because he spoke too boldly against us.\n\nSecond of all--the rape of Baghdad was extremely disgusting.  By rape, I mean the archeological treasures of several millenia went on sale on ebay overnight.  It's a loss for the entire world.\n\nThirdly--the dismissal of the Iraqi army *insured* civil war.  Having no army leaves the state--democratically reformed or not--incapable of defending itself.  Why did we want this?  What were we thinking?  What is the goal here?\n\nFourthly--our fates are shared.  There is a connection.  To the extent that Iraq will be entrenched in civil war, America will be there as well.  The conservatives can't seem to back away from this war--such is their leadership, and they love their leaders dearly.  The liberals want to take responsibility for the wrong we have done.  America will be in Iraq for quite a while.\n\nIt's pretty sad, actually.  I hope Iraq pulls through, but it will never, ever be the same.
143097
In one word nopes, definitely NOT. I agree with your views on most of what youve said. I just want to ask George Bush one thing, who made him the judge and the jury? Who gave him the license to 'liberate' countries of their autocratic rulers? If he's so concerned about the world being free and fair, then is he suffering from partial blindness that he cant see Cuba, Zaire, Mozambique and Pakistan? Or is it that these countries aren't rich enough? Plus, he didn't have enough knowledge or respect for the Iraqi sentiments or ethos, and what's happening right now at Iraq - the state of perpetual civil war - is thir own doing. But one thing that I can't figure out, about which I hope you'll enlighten me is that, is the average american stupid? If not, then how come the 'big brother' got re-elected?
588673
I may not be able to tell you a direct answer, but when over 50% of American 18-24 year olds can not find IRAQ on a WORLD MAP, there is a problem.  This is only coming from a concerned college level student, but also a geography major!
552747
I answered that in your repeated question... these are out-dated lies, after more people got involved in Iraq, no one found what your bush claimed.
684922
the same place u can find ur head in (your @ss). ignorance is a shame. I'm just mad that our tax money has gone to educating-or lack there of- ur dumb@ass and the U.S. education system has failed u miserably. i will pray for you and hope u r sterile.
253862
CHECK YOUR "HISTORY".  NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION.
930357
You are just learning that you have been deceived by propaganda. The US is, and never was, the land of the free.\n\nNow you need to get past the government propaganda about Iraq and you should be OK
194479
NO. I have friends and family who are in Iraq in the military and my father in law just got back from Iraq as a civilian bomb dog handler. Each of them has told me how saddened and sickened they are by the media portrayal of only negative things from the war. Each of them has told me about how they can see positive changes in Iraq and how much better the living conditions are over there now and how they have started schools and brought order back in many places. I don't think that is a waste of time. It is hard for us who have people we love over there and I am sure we would like to see them all come home safely and not have to be at war -- but the efforts made my our troops in Iraq are not a waste of time.
689846
That's good satire. \nOne need only look at Iraq and what the US has done there, to have a quiet chuckle reading this question. Never mind that the question doesn't warrant a serious reply.
888036
RRROOOOFFLLL\nNice lil pic there mind if i use it?\nAnd we're in Iraq for Bush's ego which has turned on himself.
897114
Well of course!!\nWhat did you think Iraq was about?\nThere isn't any oil in Srlianka!
931382
im sorry but i dont see the question?
901778
I served in Iraq and feel the same as I do now.  we are trying to do the right thing are are the only hope the Iraqi people have for a better future.\n\nSounds like you are another one of those clueless idiots who thinks that his political opinions means that he can tell me what I think.
50168
Following the formula of something yet to be discovered must be there defies physics. The analogy of losing something in your home and knowing it's there doesn't work because we didn't live in Iraq and physically lose, misplace or hide weapons of mass destruction. Iraq did not have plenty of time to hide weapons because resolution 1441 from the UN recalled previous resolutions that stated what would happen if there were weapons found and that sanctions should be applied unilaterly through the UN. It is doubtful that our sattilites and other technologies could not track these weapons, but could accuratly find them and define them with great detail before the war. Powell when addressing showed pictures of trucks "where" chemical weapons were made. But you can't track semis through the dessert?  There were wmd's in Iraq which came from various administrations in the 80's that were used to fight Iran. But most of that was used and the rest accounted for and destroyed by weapons inspectors. I find if very interesting that Saddam had these weapons at his disposal and decided to "hide" them instead of using them against the troops when we invaded. Not only were wmd's not in Iraq, but Iraq lacked the capabilities to launch these missles to isreal let alone the US as he had no missles with a range further than 90 miles and once a missle hit it's target there was no way to deploy the warhead (wmd) without vaporizing it. What is also interesting is that bush claimed Saddam had at his disposal airforce training planes that would spread these weapons. How is it a single engine prop could not be detected especially if we knew about them and not destroyed before refueling 40 times and days later if it were to attack the US? Yeah I agree Iraq is better off without Saddam, but one cannot change the motive after an action to justify the lack of a motive in the first place. He should be allowed to run his mouth as even he is entitled to free speech, but then again few could listen and find justification for what he did.