What is your opnion about IRAN? do you think it's time to to change (N) instead of (Q) : IRA(Q)>>IRA(N) ?
534730
IRAN and IRAQ will be the Grave of U.S.A. militarism. No need for changes N to Q or vice-versa
757317
Hello,,\nI'm no expert on Irish politics or economics,,,which are typically 2 primary considerations in  foreign investment.\n\nI Do know a few Irish stocks which trade on American exchanges.\n\nThey have generally done well,,both as Companies and in terms of maintaining American Investors' confidence.\n\nThat's not real research,,but it's a Positive Indication towards both InvestorSentiment and Ireland's economic/business climate\n\nAnd I don't know of anything about Ireland which would make Investing  there particularly or unusually risky.\n\n\nAIB IRE CRH ELN ICLR IONA RYAAY SKIL TRIB\n\nThere's a few US Traded "pink sheets" also,\n\nAGIBY CCGGY GLAPY GNCGY KRYAY GCMXY\n\nAll those represent only a small sampling of "Business in Ireland",but as you can see the stocks have done pretty well\n\nhttp://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AIB,IRE,CRH,ELN,ICLR,IONA,RYAAY,SKIL,TRIB\n\nYou may have to check the PinkSheet Symbols on BigCharts.com,etc to see their charts in order to observe their historical performances.\n\nhttp://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=agiby&sid=0&o_symb=agiby&freq=2&time=13\n\n\nActual research can be done online according each specific company.\n\n\nIreland seems OK to me\n\nHope that helps
77404
Is your Simple IRA for your own business, or did you work for a small company that sponsored it? If you can still contribute to your Simple, there is no reason to contribute to a Traditional IRA; the contribution limits on your Simple are higher than a Traditional IRA and why go through the extra expense of setting up a traditional IRA?\n\nIf your Simple is sponsored by a company you no longer work for, then setting up a traditional and/or Roth IRA is a good idea. I recommend that my clients have both taxable and tax free pools to draw upon in retirement if at all possible.
958913
Normally I vote as a Moderate. I like our leaders to be as center as possible. I was attracted to Bush's thought of compassionate Conservatism as it was an idea of moderation. I cannot stand the far left and do not think the far right are any better. Though with the choices at hand and the state of the world today I have to ask myself one question," What sort of world do I want my grandchildren to live in?" Currently, my oldest is 13 years old so I'm talking 20 years down the road. I am voting Republican across the board. The Muslim extremist make it very clear. Their only objective is to convert the world to Islam at the cost of innocent life. The war is really with Iran and the battleground just happens to be in Iraq. They must be defeated or eventually a nuclear bomb will no doubt end up in the hands of terrorists somewhere here in America. The Iranian president says publicly that it his reason for being to facilitate the "true Jihad" and calls for the destruction of Israel and the great Satan of America. It is a time for Conservative leadership at the moment. A day will come when I will vote towards the left. The left attempts to make us think this is their time . I believe otherwise. The stakes are too high. Mistakes have been made, Yes. Yet this is time for a "leader", not a time for someone who really only cares what the polls are saying. Thank You.
226396
Iran has announced that they are going to open an oil market that opperates on the Euro.  That's bad for America because the US dollar is currently the primary currency for international oil trade.  So the United States has announced that Iran plans to have nuclear weapons.  How convenient.\n\ntaz: That's exactly what the US government wants you to think.  It's called propaganda.  Keep in mind that eveything that government agencies say they say for a reason.  They rarely just tell the straight out truth, and the current administration has a particularly notable history of lying.  You should always think about why they're saying what they're saying.
689599
Yes, it appears to me that several events are starting to line up quickly. Hamas and the cut off of their funds is a ticking time bomb. The Iranian president is trying to provoke a conflict with the west in a attempt to usher in the Muslim messiah. If the U.S. or Israel attacks Iran their will be a response that could be the one foretold in Ez ch 38. That in turn could be the conflict that results in a peace treaty with Israel which is the start of the tribulation.
962908
If you are an immigrant and are planning to go back, then you may want to take it out, coz becoming debt free should be your primary goal. But if you are a citizen, a greencard holder or planning to continue to stay here. Please leave it there. Its very great that you have started with your IRA fund. I would not take it out.
420045
I don't think Iran will back down and we will probably strike Iran with possible the help of Israel. I think that probably won't happen for several months until all else fells. This could be the start of the tribulation.
414471
I have several Iranian friends. I find them all to be genuine, helpful, friendly, honest and lovely people. And all of them are happy not to be living under the present Iranian administration.\n\nIran has always historically been an important power and, next to China, it has arguably the oldest continuous classical culture in the world. One day they will be able to take their due place in the international arena as a great nation with much to contribute.\n\nOf course, they'll have to change their government before that can happen.
378616
The Iranian government should be restructured; I'm not sure that an invasion is the best way to do it. But, with their stated goals of wiping out Israel, etc., and their pursuit of nuclear weapons (not nuclear power; they have plenty of oil) they are scary, scary.
3215
I would consider an alternative.  Should the Iraqi experiment (this being another attempt to stimulate it into a democracy) succeed in terms of stability, what other economies, and thus their currencies, will benefit?  I would select a proxy currency that is more liquid, such as that of Lebanon or Egypt or Israel, all of which would substantially benefit from greater peace in the region.
312824
Yah.. I agree with Kamran! If you want to go to Tehran, don't learn Arabic because it is not the native language there! \n\nWhy do you want to make a girflriend in Iran anyway?
387312
Why would the Bush Administration risk widening Gulf War II to include Iran when it still has the chance to limit its losses to Iraq? The most popular explanation is that the US wants to pre-empt the Iranian decision to set up a Tehran oil bourse to facilitate the selling and buying of oil in euros instead of US dollars.\n\nThe idea is that this would cause a chain reaction in which more and more oil producers and their customers would trade in euros and eventually force the US to pay for its oil in euros too. This would mean the US would have to do what every other country in the world has to do, namely earn foreign exchange through exports in order to pay for its oil imports.Last year the US trade deficit for petroleum products was about $300 billion. While the $US remains the international reserve currency and oil continues to be traded in dollars, the US can pay for its oil simply by printing more IOUs in the form of US treasury bills.\n\nIf the US had to find euros (or yuan) to pay for its oil, it would have to increase taxes, cut consumption and increase exports. In short, according to this scenario, the US could no longer afford to be a military superpower and would have to cut back its global adventures.\n\nIn the process, the $US would collapse, wiping out the accumulated financial assets of America's major creditors and probably causing a depression of 1930s dimensions. More generally, such a development opens up the question of whether the reserve status of the $US is supporting US superpower status, or whether US military power is propping up the reserve currency status of the $US.So can we conclude that an Iranian oil bourse trading oil in euros is the real reason for the current crisis? Perhaps this is prematurely jumping to conclusions. The claim that the Iranian bourse will definitely trade in euros appears to me to be based primarily on speculation at this stage. I have yet to see a clear statement on this from the Iranian government. There are certainly good reasons for suspecting that it might be in euros, since Iranian government sources have previously spoken favourably about trading for oil in euros (9,10) and according to a statement attributed to the Vice-Governor of the Iranian central bank, Iran began selling oil in euros to Europe in 2003.Pentagon sources confirm the Bush administration could undertake a desperate military strategy to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions while simultaneously attempting to prevent the Iranian oil Bourse from initiating a euro-based system for oil trades. The later would require forced "regime change" and the U.S. occupation of Iran. Obviously this would require a military draft. Objectively speaking, the post-war debacle in Iraq has clearly shown that such Imperial policies will be a catastrophic failure. Alternatively, perhaps a more enlightened U.S. administration could undertake multilateral negotiations with the EU and OPEC regarding a dual oil-currency system, in conjunction with global monetary reform. Either way, U.S. policy makers will soon face two difficult choices: monetary compromise or continued petrodollar warfare.
31102
hi, i am iranian, and at the firs, i must say, this is false if we say iran hate US or israel,\nthis hate's only from they politics and evryone know in 1357(shamsi) about1970 ,when iran king back to us and kingdoms has been cleared, us got milyard dollars from iran's center bank and say :i got it for king(shah) and other iranians, bud nver give it back, and israel's and us's plan surely isn't to be friend with iran and so iran hate them,\nat all, the friend ship of iran & US is suitable for this countries and it is possible if they change their politics. and you know! us now doesn't let many countryes to busines with iran and us doesn't sale aircraft's &&&&&&&&& to iran, and iran shuld trade with china and russia and has not any way else!
404471
Oh yeah, Iraq is working out so well.  Iran, with a laregr populice that actually supports its government, would work out even better.\n\n(Incidentally, I think the idea of trying to convince Iran that it doesn't need nuclear weapons by threatening to drop nuclear weapons on it, as the Bush administration floated over the weekend, is brilliant psychology.)
310143
we have a whole bunch of opinion about iran. listen to this. \nhttp://scotthortonshow.com/\nhttp://thestressblog.com\nhttp://www.kaos959.com\nhttp://www.antiwar.com\nmoney, http://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\neducation, http://www.philipdru.com/taylor_stream.html\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/gatto_stream.html\nww1 wilson,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=88\nww2 http://www.philipdru.com/stinnett_stream.html\nnam http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=108\ngovernment explained simply,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=98\nbush & clinton http://www.philipdru.com/triplett_stream.html\nisrael http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/webb_stream.html\niran http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=131
949016
I sympathize with your country's situation. But you have to understand that you have been taken control under a theocracy that is ruled by an anti-semitic radical muslim. We can't trust Iran's word to say that they will only use it for nuclear power giving the history of disagreement with Israel. Ahmanidejad has said he will blow up Israel and he doens't believe the Holocaust ever happened. The Iran-Iraq war was horrible and innocent lives were lost. The U.S. at that time did help Saddam because we viewed Iran as a bigger threat. I apologize on my country's behalf. But we were nervous of a potential Middle East crisis and we tried to salvage it. It's because of this history that we can't trust Ahmanidejad because we can't run the risk of him blowing up Israel or take over a weak Iraq. If this occurs, it will expand the war in the Middle East and possibly create a WWIII which will hurt everybody. This is why we don't support nuclear development in Iran. If you can guarantee us that Iran won't blow up Israel then who knows? Until then, try to see this from our point of view.