Can Bill Clinton be vice president if Hillery were to nominate him as her running mate?
541636
He could not, unless he claims to be a resident of a different state than Hillary.
527529
DEFINITELY YES!!!  Because Bill would be in the White House again.  You know how fun there is whenever Bill is in the Oval office.  Just ask Monica!
366243
No, he cannot.  A President, as far as anyone knows, CAN be Vice President after he serves two terms as President.  However, if the President would step down or die in office, the Vice President could NOT serve as President, since he has reached his Constitutional limit.
370252
I think she would stand more than a 50-50 chance, because people still like Bill, and he would be part of that team again.  That two-for-one deal with the Clintons.\n\nAlso, a lot of people are ready to have a woman for president, and Hillary has a lot of political experience.\nI don't know if I would vote for her, it would depend on who she was running against.
604132
She may be a person of great abilities and political potential, but the simple answer is NO. The problem with Hillary is that like Kerry, her position on the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights (B. of R.) makes her just too unacceptable to a large segment of the American people. The last Presidential election forced many to choose between defending the 1st or the 2nd acts of the B.of R., and most do not want that again. Abortion is really about Religious beliefs, and most here do not agree with the Pres'. position. But many also feel that the Right to Bare Arms is essential to guaranty our freedoms FROM OUR OWN GOVERNMENT. Least we would have had KING RICHARD NIXON! And that is no joke.
938436
I AM PRETTY SURE HE COULD RUN FOR V.P. BUT NOT WITH HILLARY AS THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BECAUSE THE RUNNING MATES HAVE TO BE FROM DIFFERENT STATES.
634671
I would love to have H. Clinton as our next President, because I am a big fan of Fox News.  Whenever H. CLinton screw up Fox could invite her here for a blow job.\n\nI heard that Mr. Murdoch is hiring her as the next hooker for Fox.\n\n(CBS) NEW YORK To call them a political odd couple would be a rash understatement.\n\nConservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch will host a fundraiser for liberal New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, the Financial Times reports.\n\nThe mating ritual of the unlikely allies has been under way for months. Clinton set political tongues to wagging last month by attending a Washington party celebrating the 10th anniversary of Fox News, the cable news channel owned by Murdoch.\n\nThe Times quoted one unnamed source as describing the Clinton-Murdoch connection in this way: "They have a respectful and cordial relationship. He has respect for the work she has done on behalf of New York. I wouldn't say it was illustrative of a close ongoing relationship. It is not like they are dining out together."\n\nThe fundraiser will take place in July, the newspaper said. Clinton is the frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, though she has not indicated whether or not she will run.\n\nClinton has worked hard to take the edge off her reputation as a card-carrying liberal. She has has collaborated with congressional conservatives on some peices of elgislation, called for a "common ground" on abortion and cut a political figure some on the left see as decidedly un-liberal.
715754
I think this question is bogus, because the assumption that Hillary is the front-runner for the 2008 Democratic nomination is, frankly, ridiculous.\n\nRepublicans would love to see her get nominated because they know she doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning.\n\nSomeday we will have a woman president. It's just not going to be Hillary. If the Democrats want to win back the presidency, they won't even let her be the V.P. nominee.\n\nSo to answer your bogus, ridiculous question -- in the matchup of your dreams, McCain/Guiliani would destroy Hillary/Obama.\n\nBut for the sake of this country, let's hope the Democrats aren't that stupid.\n\nP.S. I think both sides would be wise to avoid nominating a U.S. Senator for president. A former U.S. Senator hasn't won a presidential election since Richard Nixon. The disadvantage for Senators is that their record on national issues is too easy for opponents to pick apart. Governors have a far easier time, IMO.
587971
No...\nClinton served two terms.\nHe could run as VP but in the event that the president died Clinton as VP still would be unable to take the office. (22ND Amendment)
188919
It wouldn't be Cheney unless George W. Bush is killed or becomes seriously ill. \n\nA Rasmussen poll in 2005 showed three possible Republican contenders with more than 20% of the vote Rudolph Giuliani, Condoleeza Rice and John McCain. \n\nIn contrast, Hillary Clinton is the clear frontrunner for the Democrat nomination with Al Gore on 14%, John Edwards on 13% and John Kerry on 10%\n\nWhile there is still a long way to go, Clinton is a clear frontrunner for the Democrats while the Republican race looks a lot closer.
720404
i would vote for a woman if i felt she was qualified. gender may however play a role in foreign affairs as some countries still have some strong beliefs about a woman's place.  I would consider Mrs. Clinton but would need to hear where she stands on certain issues
782268
First of all, Hillary will never happen.... she isnt taken seriously enough, and besides, no one wants another Clinton in office, she put in her 2 cents while hubby was busy with Monica....\n\nAnyways, President Bush is still the President & has the power to Veto if he so chooses, and believe me he will, with use of discretion of course, he wont be pushed around..
168231
That's a good question! I don't think we know her name yet. It won't happen for a few more elections, and will probably be someone that is not in politics yet, or just getting started. Hilary will run, but I don't think she will get past the primaries. We will have a female VP soon though. Might be this next election or the one after or the one after that, but I feel that it will happen soon.
1013568
Bill Clinton engaging in sexual acts with Hillary Clinton may just be a homosexual act. It certainly isn't heterosexual. All depends on if you believe that Hillary is actually a woman.
757633
Representative Charles Rangel, Democrat from New York.  Probably a good buddy of Hillary Clinton.
863768
I think the Democrats would be pretty foolish to put Hillary on the ticket.  Like Bob Dole in 1996, she appeals ONLY to her solid base, and nobody outside of that set would vote for her.  She doesn't have the assets of her husband.  Bill is a creative thinker, she is a rote thinker.  Beyond the charm, Bill can actually talk policy details and policy theory.  Hillary can only speak in platitudes (e.g. - "Our children are our future...").  Despite his ambition, Bill comes across as a likeable guy, she comes across as a power-grubbing witch.  Bill seems real, she seems contrived (for instance, the "right" turns she has taken in the Senate).  Her "concern" and "caring" seem false.  For example, several years ago when asked how small businesses would be able to afford "Hillary-Care," she snapped, "I can't be responsible for every under-capitalized business in this country!"  Many snipes such as this will come back to haunt her.  Up to this point, she has never been a national candidate and hasn't had any obligation to explain her role in any scandals.  I'm sure she will have to be forthcoming about how she managed to defy laws of economics, mathematics and the Securities Exchange Commission by trading in cattle futures (and that's just for starters).  Assuming Republican results were tainted by scandal this season, Democrats would be wise to put someone else in the general election.
473312
Yes, I would like to play "house boy" to Hillary Clinton.