this guy Mousowii, who just got life in a CO priz,was he REALLY involved in the fall of the TWIN TOWERS,or not
539007
It appears that the guy was involved in Al Qaeda, but was either inept, a coward, or both.  He used his time on this earth to aspire to be the lowest scumbag you can imagine ... and he couldn't even succeed at that.  I am so glad he gets to think about that while he grows old and rots in a concrete cell, rather than get his last chance for martyrdom.\n\nAs for whether 911 was staged by our government, I don't believe it for a second.  Bush and crew are far too *incompetent* to pull that off.  They can't even leak a CIA operative's name without getting caught ... to pull off a secret operation like 911 would be impossible for them.\n\nThat said, I think the war in Iraq is a sham.  The American people were (rightly) ready to take heads after 911, and Bush directed us at the *wrong target* for the *wrong reasons*.  (1) There is no evidence of any Saddam involvement in 911; (2) was plenty of evidence showing that Saddam and Bin Laden *hated* each other; and (3) Saddam was was not an Islamic idealogue, he was a cowardly power-hungry secular dictator who cared about nothing but staying in his cozy palaces ... attacking the U.S. would have been the *last* thing he wanted to be involved in ... gained him nothing, lost him everything.  \n\nWhen we had Bin Laden on the run in Afghanistan, and then Bush stops and goes after Bin Laden's hated enemy Saddam Hussein ... Bin Laden must have wet his pants from laughing so hard at Bush.  And then to have us dismantle our precious freedoms with a USAPATRIOT act, and then to leave Iraq in a political shambles just ready for a fanatical Islamic theocracy like Iran ... Bin Laden right now must be smiling ear to ear with how well 911 worked out for him.  Thanks Mr. Bush!  "Bring it on."\n\nOh, and let me add, that I think any enlisted soldier serving in Iraq deserves nothing but respect and praise.  Nothing detracts from their heroism.  It is *for this reason* that I have no kind words for any President who would put our soldiers in harms way without a very *very* good reason!
142684
He was born in September 11, 1945.
108448
This is one of those nutty conspiracy theories.  The satellite photo was takeng the day after the attacks.  It doesn't show much of anything that you can distiguish in any detail.  For all we know, they could have hauled debris away that might have hampered rescue efforts.  Who knows how much of the debris might be in the building?\n\nThe second photo was taken 3 days after the attacks.  Again, debris could have been removed to safety reaons, etc. And it isn't a vgood picture.  Debris could be in areas not shown on the photo like the courtyard area.\n\nThen of course there is the security tape showing the crash.  There is nothing new here, this is just someone who has too much time on their hands.\n\nAdded:\n\nYour question was "try this out and comment".  You posted a link to inconclusive photos that could be interpreted any number of ways.  You try to point to some vague conspiracy and a cover up with no supporting evidence.  How do you think people are supposed to react?  You ask where the wreckage is and I provide a number of plausible explanations that you chose not to ignore and not to analyze.
347447
Yes, the buildings were insured for an unheard off amount a month before the event and there were numerous other things that point towards this type of theory bin laden and the bush family have had business deals in the past as well as the other players within the New World Order and other secret societies, The rest of the world are just pawns in a game of a chosen few. If a leader of a country denies what is expected of them, they are ejected in one form or another.\nI try not to read too much into it because there is nothing I can do nor anyone else\n\nI also have to add that clinton is in on it as well, from the same group.\n\nDo you really think that it was a matter of fate that the buildings fell like that of a controlled implosion.\n\nI also found it interesting that chaney was hidden away while bush was talking through a blow horn at ground zero
1000835
Yes do you think there was a better way of getting public support without an incident in this country? He was feeding of the country's rage and sadness to manipulate the situation to get back over there. There are roomers that there was a notice on his desk about that 2 days prior to the 9/11 incident yet nothing was done. Things that make you go hum-mm.
1050380
Your mixing apples with oranges.  Do you think that flying into the Twin Towers was an act of war? Now that was a true act of murder.  It was also a cowardice act, because no one gained anything out of it. That attack was also aimed at most of the countries in the world.  There were citizens of other countries which were murdered in that crash.  That is why the Twin Towers were called "The World Trade Center".
313525
Yes. He was the chief financer behind the terrorist attacks, and was responsible for introducing and training all of the major figures.
813176
I think he was more a bomber than a terrorist. But he could be considered both.
556301
What denial am I, as an American that was standing in front of the World Trade Center as the first jet crashed into the building in?  Please elaborate &  I'll tell you if my eyewitness account jibes with your story.
862928
islalamofascists were responsible for 9/11. You can find tons of doctored video. There is not doubt at all about who is responsible.
196938
(I have rearranged the paragraphs from theage.com's article cited below).\n\nPavel Hlava, an immigrant construction worker from the Czech Republic, shot footage of the first plane hitting the north tower as a 4WD vehicle he was riding in entered the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel en route to lower Manhattan. \n\nThe footage, obtained by The New York Times, was taken by a Czech immigrant construction worker whose son at one point came close to accidentally erasing the rare, chilling footage, the newspaper reported on its website today. \n\nThe only videotape known to have captured both planes slamming into the World Trade Centre, and only the second image of the first strike, has surfaced on the eve of the second anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attacks. \n\nFederal officials investigating the Trade Centre collapse are trying to obtain a copy of the hourlong tape, which could cast light on the cause of the north tower's collapse by helping to determine factors including the exact speed at which the first plane travelled, The Times said. \n\nThe only other known footage of the first plane's impact came from a French film crew making a documentary about a probationary firefighter. \n\nHlava, who made the tape looking at the camera's relatively low-resolution LCD display, told the Times he did not see the first plane as he focused on the towers. \n\nBut the tape shows a whitish object hitting the tower, followed by dust spurting from the tower's side and a silvery, expanding cloud. \n\nPassing through the tunnel, Hlava, his brother and his boss heard a radio report that a small private plane had hit the World Trade Centre, straight ahead outside the tunnel. \n\nThat hardly prepared them for what they saw when they emerged: the north tower, looming over them, bursting with flames. \n\nAs Hlava continued filming, the second jet shrieked behind him. He caught the plane as it crashed into the south tower, exploding into an orange fireball and sending papers flying in every direction. \n\nLater, after crossing the Brooklyn Bridge, he focused on the buildings again as the south tower tilted to one side and collapsed. \n\nHlava and his brother, Josef, unsuccessfully tried to sell the tape in New York and in the Czech Republic, the newspaper said. \n\nHlava said through a Czech-language translator that language difficulties hindered his ability to sell or release the tape to the media. \n\nHe also said that so much time had passed that he had doubted there was still interest in the tape. \n\n"All his friends, they told him, 'Hey, you made a mistake. You waited too long'," translator David Melichar told The Times. \n\nHlava's boss, who was driving, also had strong objections to selling the tape, Melichar said. \n\nHlava and Melichar's numbers are not listed and attempts by The Associated Press to reach them were unsuccessful. \n\nIn the weeks and months after the attack, the tape sat in Hlava's apartment in the Ridgewood section of Queens. \n\nOn one occasion, Hlava said he noticed that his son was playing with the video camera and erasing the tape. Hlava snatched the camera away before either of the plane impacts were erased. \n\nA friend of Hlava's wife obtained a copy of the tape and traded it to another Czech immigrant to pay off a bar tab. \n\nAnother woman learned of the existence of the copy and brought it to the attention of a freelance news photographer who took the tape to The Times.\n\nThe photographer, Walter Karling, who now describes himself as Hlava's agent, said it had not been sold to any television station. The Times said it had not paid for the tape. \n\nKarling's number was not published and he could not be reached for comment by The Associated Press. \n\n\n- AP
591151
osama's little al qaeda has helped american and british interests more than any othe party.so yeh ,this guy is no arab,he was born in arabia but was raised in the land we cal america.of course they know.
1149911
Absolutely absurd. How could the US have helped 9/11? Why would  they? How would no one have come up with any credible evidence after all these years? What reason is there to think that it was not a well-planned attack, run by a large group of Arab terrorists? I think that is the story that fits the evidence.\n\nThey're not addressed in any plausible way. Vast conspiracies don't actually happen or work. Someone always finds out, and yet there's no evidence of this conspiracy.\n\nEdit: Jets did not intercept the planes because they are stationed hundreds of miles from where they were and were not alerted until shortly before the planes crashed. The FAA notified NORAD at 8:40 and planes were scrambled 6 minutes later, 153 miles from the World Trade Center and the first plane crashed at about that time. http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_mckinneysucks_archive.html#77997492\n\nThe buildings fell quickly because they were crashed into by giant airliners. It seems like a building like that should be able to withstand more, but neither you, nor I, nor Ruppert, nor even the engineers who built the towers know what it is like for a plane to crash into a building. The commission report clearly states that the plane struck main support beams and started fires that raged at intense temperatures, further weakining the already weakened supports. Once that happens it doesn't take long for a building to collapse onto itself.\n\nAs for WTC7, the report is clear enough that fires were started on several floors by debris. People say it looks too controlled, but they failr to realize that buildings that tall are made to crumble down and not out. If a main beam buckles, there's no momentum to throw debris out - the force is all down.\n\nHow long it took to form a commission is a question I have myself, but that alone does not make a conspiracy.\n\nAs for explosions, see this: http://www.geocities.com/factsnotfantasy/ExplosivesDebunked.html
338420
the guy is very real why else are all these Muslims fallowing a guy and killing each other just to do terrorism he is their leader and pls watch more news there are serious stuffs happening in this world
847015
ooohooohh\n I read an article where he was at ground zero and you know what he said?\n He said the real killers can never be found cause they were in the towers the day they fell, what kind of shit is that\n\nhe moved to miami to do this so he wouldnt have to pay ron or nicoles family from the civil suit, assholes oj and his lawyers
48174
First of all It's Osama Bin Ladin. He is just like u and me but more desperate, he had seen more brutality than us, has more money and a god damn organisation. He just like us hated when our brothers and sisters are hurt and killed without proper reasons but he acted differently. He just took a step a little further. He is said to be involved in 9/11 attacks. If that's true he did something really wrong. But to him it's fine coz America did and doing the same thing to his muslim brothers and sisters. Whatever it is, he shouldn't have done that. Now, there's no difference between him and America.
133698
I think it may be possible. Do you know that Hitler put the government building in fire- in Germany- and spread out the idea that it was russians residing in Germany who did it?(Read the history on the subject). Who has got the most benefit through the 9/11 events? Destroying the enemies (Saddam and Taliban) with a great excuse.