Do you know why bush wants to make wars?
542230
he does it because the aliens from outer space told him to do
503708
No. All wars have a root cause of economics and then you go from there. Money and emotions run the world.
1066712
When you dont let the UN do its search and you want to go to War based on 10 year old inteligence... That could be the problem.  Bush rushed to war knowing that if he didnt do it quickly there might be a lot more opposition to his claims.  If he could start the war he knew they wouldnt be able to just walk away when the shit hit the fan.  This is Bush's personal agenda.\n\nBy the way when did Republicans become Nation builders??  Before Bush was elected they gave the Democrats hell over trying to change leadership and build new government in foriegn countries. Even Bush as Texas Governer said nations should be left alone and not told how to run their country.
624106
With Bush in office...probably. He seems to use any excuse to go to war with anyone.
2522
bush make sence?? ben laden hides at afganistan, Bush attacks Iraq?!!! \nplease.. don't be that stubid.\ni guess since you never had war at your land you'll never understand what war is..\n\nliving in war my friend mean no fredom at all, you can't do anything other than living in constant fear if whta you or your loved ones might die in such terrible way and for no good reason.\n\nwar can serves the inrests of big rich people such as BUsh and his bodys (sharon and ect.)\n\ndon't tell me war is good or make sence.\n\nanimals of the same spices don't call war agains each other!! (unless ofcourese they were trained too by people)\n\nat last, i hate war, it easly destroy everything a soicity billt in too much years.
229331
Theoretically yes but ...\n\nThere are many interests at work.\n1. Arm dealers: US is high tech and needs to keep ahead in research. New weapons are developed in an industry that manages huge amounts of money, so huge that they could actually finance wars so they can make weapons (allegations not proven, but I use the sentence to illustrate how much cash is involved and what power comes with that). Old weapons just need maintanance and cost but they are easilly transformed into a source of revenue by selling them to other countries. US junk is sold by weapon dealers to many countries, mainly african, etc, wherever there's a war zone. War is business and US is best at it (no 1 weapons exporter in any market: white,grey,black). Diplomacy doesn't pay, but must be kept as a facade in order to allow diplomats to be re-elected so they can continue war business. Companies like TI thrive on war, they got more contracts and sub-contracts from the govt in the last 3 years than in the previous 10 put together.\n2. Secret Services: Secret services have thrived too in war, they got more rights, more money, more finance for offshore operations.\n3. Politics: you've seen Bush talk, he can barely connect two sentences on his own and even when reading pre-written speaches he takes pauses, etc. He isn't a diplomat, he can't stand his own ground in diplomacy. He hasn't done a good job at keeping the country together. He doesn't have a valid economic plan to increase wealth and economic power, he scares the population with terrorist threats to justify military spendings, fears which keep getting him re-elected. He doesn't know to convince, only to threaten and needs to back his threats with something: a bigger army.\nWhere is this going to? Hard to tell. But with all these interests at work for making a profitable war-machine is hard to think that there will ever be a good US diplomacy. Look at Cheney, look at Bush, look at Rice ... they all keep saying the same thing: do it our way or be crushed. No attempt for empathy, no knowledge of history, no diplomatic skill (not even some subterfuge for God's sake, do your schemes and follow your interests but do it covertly dammit, Clinton wasn't much better but at least he tried and had some charm).\nDo you wonder why they prefer a warmachine to diplomacy ?
67937
Don't tell bush! He might just have us go to war with them just for thinking about it!
219319
Bush should be on the front line fighting his war.
300518
he probably figures that he can make allies, b/c china & other nations r so powerful that if we can get some allies then we may survive against the next world war (yes there will be another world war and most likely it will b in the next 50 years, and if bush keeps going like he has been, it'll be sooner than that)
113042
Do you talk about Matwees or Samurl Huntington's "clash of civilizations"?\nAs it looks it is inevitable. Just hope it will go easy on the world, because Bush looks serious about taking up a war.
758552
Its typical Bush he likes to send soldiers to war on false premises and ill defined goals.  He is trying to deflect attention for his utter failure
601748
It's stocks and big business, weapons manufacturers, Oil Companies, forced inflation. You see it's a lot easier to make more money by raising the prices up then hiring more people to increase your production. You have done nothing but raise the price and collect the money. That is what the Republicans are about. War is is they don't serve in the military, and fight the wars, they just profit from the outcomes of the wars like George Bush, and Cheney have. People mean nothing to them and their people will never be in harms way. George Bush wont even go to Iraq, He sent Tony Blair last week, He is a sissy.
734324
Arrogant tyrants like George W. Bush see war as a means to increase their wealth and power.\n\nThe UN, a talk shop, has undoubtedly prevented wars. But it cannot prevent the actions of tyrants who consider themselves to be above the law and/or directed by God.
964603
because bush wants their oil
400999
BUSH wanted to finish off the guy who threatened his Daddy and to cover for the fact that he let Osama bin Laden get away at Tora Bora. He also wanted a perpetual war so that he could trade on being a "War President" for the remainder of his term of office (Afghanistan collapsed too quickly).\n\nBut to be fair, Bush was not the only one who wanted to go to war.\n\nRUMSFELD and WOLFOWITZ wanted a testing ground for their spectacularly unsuccessful and misguided "army of the future" strategy.\n\nCHENEY wanted to give no-bid, cost-plus contracts to Halliburton to improve the value of his stock options.
138081
Bush is just a fag who likes to bomb other countries and take over them. He likes to accuse people of having weapons of mass descruction, and only helped Florida in their time of need because his brother runs the state... :P\n\nAnd plus, the cost of the war in Iraq is running us about 244 billion dollars, and is increasing about 1,000 dollars every SECOND! Do you think you would be able to afford to help some people in tragedy if you were wasting all your money shooting people?!\n\nI dunno. Maybe Bush isn't doing anything because he got mad at the traffic during Marti Gras. Hey, you never know...
779785
I think the most possible reason is that it sends a message to the Democrats that Mr. Bush is willing to deal with them. Further it signals the country that their message has been heard. I must say though that I believe this was planned in advance of the election with a definite possibility that if the Republicans had won it would not have happened. If you examine Mr. Bush' record in Texas he did have a history of bi-partisan cooperative efforts. I don't believe he is incapable of working with congressional democrats now, so long as both sides are open to that cooperation. Either way I believe the war effort will benefit with some fresh attitudes and ideas possible with a new SecDef.