Do I have the right to sue the state for totaling my car when a large metal disc flipped up under my car?
537339
I was told when debris is on the roadway and damages your vehicle it is considered "an act of god" I'd contact a lawyer in your state
1066069
Ok. You have to be careful on how you play your game here because if he can prove that anything you say about him is untrue he may have grounds for his deformation suit.\n\nIf he has wronged you, there are a couple of things you can do:\n1. Sue him for the wrong he did to you. \n2. Contact the better business bureau in your area\n3. Report what he did to the government group that regulates car dealers in your area\n4. Contact the TV station in your area that does customer complaint reporting.
935209
If no one was cited for the crash then the insurance does not have to pay a penny even if the other person told you it was their fault and gave you all the insurance information.\n\nExample. I know a guy who cut someone off and side swiped them. He told them it was his fault and gave the insurance information. They agreed not to call the police but 3 hours later he got a phone call from a cop asking him what happend. The cop looked at his cars damage and could not determine who was at fault. Even so he told them his insurance would pay and he already filed a claim to have them fix the car, he was pissed that they called the cops and called the insurance and cancled the claim. The insurance said as long as he wasnt cited they wont have to pay unless he wants them to.\n\nYou probally pissed the person who rear ended you off when you called the police. You should of worked it out with them and had them agree to have their insurance pay for your car.\n\nIts probally to late.
856946
The owner of the car is responsible unless he gave you permission to drive the car. The witness who changed his story can repudiate it and tell the truth in court as a witness for you and tell why he had to change his story because of the officer.\n You may be able to pursue legal action against the actual driver and the girl who actually caused the accident in the first place.\n Consult a lawyer,if you can't afford one,the court has to get you one and time to prepare.\n I also agree with other posts,you were wrong to change seats and you need to get new friends.
339530
The only people you should speak to about your accident are the police, your insurance company, and your lawyer. Never give out any personal information over the phone. \n\nIf in fact the air bag did malfunction your insurance company should be able to guide you through what needs to be done. The government would have nothing to do with it.
567575
I'm a 3rd year law student and I am going to say "yep". Generally speaking, tou can pretty much always sue someone for negligence (or an intentional tort). Plaintiffs just need four things: (1) Duty [to the child], (2) Breach of that duty, (3)Causation- "but for" this, that wouldn't have happened and proximate causation (see a lawyer for explanation) and (4)damages.  The question and issue in this case is going to be "Are the parents at fault for the child being in the drive thru and getting hit?" If so, this could lead to contributory negligence which, in some states, will totally bar any recovery for the parents. In other states, known as comparative negligence states, it will reduce the amount of damages the parents can recover---it just depends on the state. I would consult a lawyer to tell you the law of the state and to apply the law to your specific facts.
920180
Call a lawyer, but I'll bet you're going to have a hard time winning.\n\nAirbags are designed to deploy only when certain things are present and if any one of those things aren't present then the airbags won't deploy. \n\nYou said you hit the concrete wall head on, how fast, head on at an angle? Did you modify the car in anyway? And remember airbags are only supplemental only not primary so you were wearing a seat belt right?\n\nAnd even if you get a lawyer and s/he agrees to take it on contingency you are responsible for all expenses.\n\nWell, be thankfull you're alive.
891411
Hello,\n\nNumber #1 - It depends on what state this incident occurred and what their bylaws are regarding the Dept. of Motor Vehicles(DMV).\nNumber #2 - Restrictions such as those you listed could mean that the driver could only drive during the day, or possibly with the physical condition a six meant they could only walk so far without assistance.  You might try to check and see if the other driver had handicap parking plates or a placard. \nNumber #3 - You listed that the driver had a history of seizures, now I don't know what state your in, however most states have serious restrictions if not complete forbiddance of the issuing of a license to someone who might blank out at anytime.  This could also be a factor of one of the restrictions, possibly he had to have someone with him at all times to be able to drive.\nNumber #4 - Don't believe all the answers that you will get on this about suing this other driver.  If the person was elderly, or on a pension suing will not get you very much except for a big headache which you probably don't need any more to worry about.  You also didn't mention if the other driver had insurance or not.  You can go after them for pain and suffering or loss of time off work.  These are often referred to as "punitive" damages.  Be weary of Lawyers wanting to represent you for "free" or "Pro Bono" which is the technical term.  They will offer to represent you and if you lose, no charge for there services.  What they don't tell you is you still have to pay the retainer fee, any office fees (i.e. copying, faxing, phone calls or questions)  The only people who come out ahead in this type of situation are the Lawyers.  Good luck to you.  I hope this helped.  \nI've seen enough of these types of cases, as you see I was a  Community Service Officer with the Police for four years.\n\nSincerely,\nFawkes
625459
Contact the DMV/BMV where it was located.\n\nIf it was yours, you can order a C.L.U.E. report.
1119247
Consult a local lawyer.  It shouldn't cost for a consultation.\n\nThere are lots of issues raised by your question, enough that even if an answerer actually knows Canadian law they would not be able to provide a full answer.  I for instance don't even know enough about Canadian law to know whether it is just Canadian law that matters, or if provincial law also matters.\n\nHere are some of the issues:  does title insurance cover it, under the law or under your specific policy?  If not, do you have a cause of action against for fraud, intentional or negligent misrepresentation, against the seller?  Or for negligence or nuisance against the parking lot operator?  Or against the inspector who inspected the house prior to purchase?  Is there another insurance policy that might cover the damage -- either your own, or the parking lot operators?  Is there a statute of limitation issue, given that this happens every Spring?\n\nYou will also have to have a damage assessment, including your foundation.
700327
You were 100% ripped off.  I would go to the Small Claims Court over this - it costs £50 for the case and you will probably win back your £160 from them so you gat a net recovery of £110 which is well worth it.
65707
Probably not.  Get your brother to give it back to you.  Has it been filed with the County Recorder?  See an attorney.
198702
Here in Pennsylvania, tow companies are given local contracts for vehicle removal from accident scenes and they can indeed charge you, or your insurance company, for the service. \n\nTechnically, unlike your lawn example, the service they provide to tow your car isn't to you - it's to the town/city/police by removing your car from the public's path, limiting their liability in case your disabled vehicle creates a danger to the public, and clearing the street.\n\nMost communities have statutes that allow for the forced removal of your property from roadways laned for traffic, most usually after accidents but occasionally for other reasons. (Abandoned cars, etc.)\n\nSo basically, if you leave your car or other property disabled for whatever reason on property owned by a state/county/city/town, they claim legal right to remove it and charge you for the pleasure.\n\n*** \nIf you're trying to find an actual statute to justify a bill, I'd start at the local level and work up. I don't think it would specifically be a traffic statute because this type of law/regulation usually covers the removal of ANY 'debris' from roadways, not just cars. Although, from my limited experience with their liability laws, I know Ontario is their own animal entirely! \n\nTry the municipality where the vehicle was towed, first; call up, explain what you're looking for, see where they can point you. Also, the tow company may have the statute on hand, especially if they run into people contesting bills. From the municipal level, work upward if you can't get a sufficient answer and KEEP NOTES! \n\nMy only concern is that unless you find a good basis to refuse payment for this sort of bill, the tow company in question could apply a mechanics lein against you which would add insult to injury and could result in legal action against you.  If you're contesting a bill, send the tow company something IN WRITING, requesting their legal basis for the right to bill you. If they have your car still, beware, they could be charging you daily storage just for having your vehicle on the property.\n\nBut I still think your best bet is to get on the phone. Good luck.
500747
*shakes head in disbelief*  Why do people answer questions when they have absolutely no idea what they are talking about?\n\nDon't bother consulting a lawyer on this one.  It would cost you too much.  This is exactly what small claims is designed for -- someone like you with a case small enough that lawyers should not be involved.\n\nSue.  On the complaint, spell out the facts of your case and then ask for alternative relief.  Meaning -- ask for the car to be put in your name.  Then put down that if the court denies you the car, that you are asking for all payments made on the car to be returned to you.  Assuming the facts as you have presented them are true, then the court will almost certainly grant you one fo these two remedies, possibly with interest.
848267
When settling your insurance claim with an insurance company you will be dealing with an adjuster. You need to remember that although this person deals with insurance negotiations on a weekly basis they are also a human being. They are doing their job but they also understand that you need to be paid for your vehicle’s damage and bodily injuries if there are any. \n\nOnce you get it in your head that the adjuster is just like you it will be easier to speak with them. The adjuster will want to tape your phone conversations and that is fine, just think before you speak. Do not say anything that might sound like you were at fault if you were not. Do not say you feel fine when in reality you are in pain from your injuries. \n\nThe best resource that you can have during negotiations is your detailed records. These records should include all the documents you have collected after the accident occurred. This includes the police report, medical records, and estimates on the car damage and so on. If you have any bodily injuries ask the doctor to note any aches or pains you report to them so that they will be detailed enough for the adjuster to understand your physical difficulties caused by the accident. \n\nThe best time to speak to the adjuster is when you have all of your documentation laid out in front of you. Use your common sense and knowledge of what has happened to you. If you feel the adjuster is offering a fair amount than take it. If you are not offered a reasonable amount by the adjuster tell them how you feel. Give them a number you would be satisfied with. \n\nAuto Quotes:  http://www.insureme.com/landing.aspx?Refby=614506&Type=auto\n\nRon @ InsureMe
267881
You need to find a good lawyer who will fight for you.  That person that was driving is supposed to be in control of his car at all times.  Did you cross the street when you weren't supposed to? The insurance companies can't tell you that you can't sue - you have that legal right.  Talk to another attorney until you find one that will help you.  Try this site:  http://www.prairielaw.com
1115582
How much were your belonging worth? Do you have any proof, e.g., receipts, etc.? Not any attorney, but doubt you could sue for more than actual damages and court costs. Have you contacted the owner or insurance company.