Why did America had to take support of so many countries to attack one small contry were they scared to loose?
547412
Just don't mind. You are welcome. It is the same with me I guess I am through this forum for 10 days or something less than that.  Some transnational companies are there to delete my questions. But I am continuously changing my name to hide it from them, not from you. Until they find me, thousands of people will have learned that America is no more controlled by national companies. Transnational companies are a great threat both for America and the world. A transnational company is one that feels no loyalty to any nation. They don’t pay any taxes to any government and they are so strong enough to overthrow governments all over the world. For the time being they are using Americans. They threat America by the fact that if they draw their capital and investments from America 25 % of its population will be jobless. \n\nThe fight and the tension between the members of the Senate is in fact a fight between the American and non-American capital owners. Right after the 9/11 the American capital owners became a little bit stronger and passed a decree from the senate to the effect that the central government and the states are to buy their weapons from national war industries... But at present non-American capital owners have become stronger enough to sip petroleum out of Iraq by using American ARMY. \n\nSorry for the terrible English. See you again. Never mind to have the yahoo cops delete my questions. Wish you prosperity and happiness. I am a mere warrior to enlighten people about facts.… Yes, they are my facts. But believe me they aren’t groundless.
591078
Because at the time the US was the only nation with atomic bombs.  \n\nAtomic bombs were so new and powerful that no one knew anything about them. Fear of the unknown is powerful. \n\nAlso it showed Japan that the US would stop at nothing to end the war and that they wanted the war over now not later and would keep fighting until it was over.
118395
I don't really understand your question, but I think you are talking about our war on terror, am I right? Well, we recieved a serious attack which killed thousands of people, more would have died if the other two planes had hit their targets. If a country, or organization, does not want the world's most powerful nation to come breaking down their door, they shouldn't make such a blatant declaration of war. (If they didn't want war, why would they hijack several planes and try to crash them into very important buildings filled with thousands of people?) Did we start fighting this war before or after their act of aggression? After. How many countries are we allied with? How many times have we entered into a war not our own to protect those allies? How many billions of dollars are we sending overseas to many different countries to give food, clothing, and medical supplies to? How much money have we spent on fighting the AIDS epidemic in Africa? And even in Iraq, we are not just fighting, we are giving them clean, running water, more electricity than they have had in many years. And yet, despite how much we help other countries, when we retalite to a despicable attack, we are labled as cruel warmongers? That is hardly fair. I am an American. I am proud to be an American. I support George Bush. To my fellow Americans, remember 9/11? Remember how sad and angry you were? Remember how you called for justice? But now that there is criticism, now that we are in an all out war, even though you are safe over here thanks to that very war, suddenly you turn cowards and traitors? Shameful! I love America, and if someone attacks her, you can bet there will be hell to pay for it.
250697
Cause France and Britain were fighting at the time and Britain was blockading our trade with France and kidnapping Our sailors and forcing them into the British Navy to Fight. USA declared war on British and the British Burned down DC, and teh President had to abandon the Capital, the only time in Hirstory that happened, Then in Baltimore they heard what happened in DC and the British were heading their to destroy the port of Baltimore, but Baltimorons were not afraid to fight and repelled the British afetr setting up defensive positions
86557
The United States "liberates" a country and then sets up a permamnent base there. We have bases all over the world idk of another government that does this.
352834
Often the goal of the united states was to be isolationist whenever possible as for much of the time we were still growing in strength as well. However, what you find in a lot of occasions, is that in the south america, or in the pacific, the united states gets involved to protect their interest. They intervne in order to gain territory, protect their ally, or whatever they case may be. They do it in Cuba, Panama, the Philippines among other places.
660930
For 2 reasons-in my opinion:  One, the number of deaths in one attack... more than Pearl Harbor.  And two, no disrespect to your possible view, but I think the US is the only country whose leaders actually DO SOMETHING when they are attacked.  Other countries complain about the US until they need help fighting someone... ironic?  SO, to answer your question, my thoughts are, my country actually doesn't sit back and wait to see what another country thinks if it is attacked.  All of Europe would be "Germany" today if this was not the case.
220254
Because they say the future of what would be needed in world community.  The US, except for President Wilson, was still in the isolated mode.  Without the US support the League of Nations did not last.
948863
When ever there are conflicts or just one with another country we all suffer and having the U.S. attack another country with or with out the same power would be a disaster to all.
956033
the US has a history of trying to be the healer of the world.\nbut there is a line between helping and supporting.\nthere is a bigger line between supporting and suppling weapons to people
42925
The United States is one country that supports peace. That's why we're trying so hard to end a war that someone started against us.
140767
one of their allies had the atomic bomb and were prepared to use it. also, Germany was the main foe, being so close to taking over Europe, they had to worry about them first. military strategy throughout history warns about fighting a battle on 2 fronts. depletes your resourses and manpower. Germany was the main concern then take on Japan.
470985
There wasn't much of a coherent argument. People were scared because of the Panic of 1893 that the US was running out of natural resources and capital, and businesses feared that they would need to have new land to be able to be competitive in the industrial world. The actual expansion that took place was justified by accusations that Spain was abusing its colonies, and so we had a moral obligation to come to their aid, but that's clearly not why we went to war with Spain.
769682
He knew (or at least supsected) that ship carried munitions to equip France and England aginst his forces. He may also have been lulled by the U.S stance of " isolatioism"which stated that the U.S was not interested in fighting a war in Europe at the time.
668573
Some countries were gearing up for war and others weren't.
539868
Don't know about the U.S., was on the opposite side during the cold war. For us, the opposite side, the effects were unpleasant: because the economy was so militarized, we had deficits of consumer goods. Could have lived better but for the competition with America. Maybe indirectly it caused the disintegration of the whole country and the collapse of the whole economy. In addition, everyone was afraid of any bang - what if that was the American bomb exploding? I know that the same was happening in the West - everyone was afraid of the Soviet bombs that could have started falling any moment.
525368
Because in the 1009s the American people - through their elected representatives gutted the military budget while increasing its overseas missions.\n\nOne of the things you decided that you were no longer going to pay for was to have adequate fighter defense of the contenental US.\n\nAs a result there were only 14 fighter aircraft 'on alert' on 9/11.  \n\nYou get what you pay for.