In which state is tea grown on a very large scale and what is the reason for it?
550061
tea is grown more in india is assam.the reason is tea plants need 13dgree C - 35 degree C of temperature.150 cm - 250 cm of rainfall.and frost is harmfull.so all these facts r thr in assam and well drained soil is needed with iron content.so assam hving 50% of tea cultivation in india.and india is the largest produce of tea in world.so assam is the ans for ur Q.second is west bengal and third is tamil nadu.
697816
The big in Asia are, presently, Japan and China.  Indonesia has a great potential  and an honesty of purpose.. but no 'greatness' yet in Economy. Growing well.  Best wishes.
282764
Italy is about the size of Arizona.  Lots of US states are larger than this including California & Texas.
657912
i tink yellowstone national. its like part of 3 states. very large.
52609
Southern states usually have more than northern states.
790165
If you will settle for an RN I will give it a shot. China has had chronic problems with the purity of their water. They have dealt with this very nicely by boiling water and then drinking it hot. The same is true in many tea drinking cultures. They tend to have a much smaller rate of water born illness.
730641
I wouldn't answer this question for all the tea in China.\n\nA lot.\n\nVery, very big.
430798
check this site out ... go to the bottom and chk the other places heading ... this is what is given\n\nThe Big Thicket National Preserve is a dense forest with a wide variety of plant and animal life. The Alabama-Coushata Indian reservation is nearby.
573985
The cost of tea in China?
1156184
Connecticut is reputedly called the nutmeg state because it used to be full of peddlers selling nutmegs.\n\nNot quite as interesting as you had hoped, I'd wager.
505537
Gotta be Texas.  A VERY large portion of it is flat, and most of it is near sea level.
1089289
China and India have large populations because of five  main factors:\n\n1) They are big. It might seem obvious, but we shouldn't overlook it. China and India have huge land surfaces. More land means you can have more people. You can appreciate the importance of that point when you realise that China and India aren't the most DENSELY populated nations on Earth. Taiwan, Monaco, Bangladesh and many other nations are cram far more people into every square mile. But those two nations are physically big so even a moderate population density translates into a massive population.\n\n2) They are primarily tropical and subtropical. This often surprises many people, who don’t think of China as a tropical nation, but around 30% of its landmass lies in the tropics. Tropical regions are inherently more productive because they receive more sunlight and are warm enough for plants to grow all year round. That means that tropical nations can produce around 5 times more food than equivalent temperate regions and subtropical regions around 3 times as much. More food allows a nation to feed more people, and thus sustain larger populations.\n\n3) They contain a lot of productive land. Both nations have an abundance of fertile land, an abundance of rainfall and an abundance of rivers for irrigation. Compare this to Australia, which is also a massive tropical nation yet has a tiny population. Most of Australia is desert that can’t support agriculture, and most of what isn’t desert is only suitable for grazing cattle and sheep. The tiny amount of land that has sufficient water for growing crops is infertile.  In contrast most of India and China can sustain agriculture, and most of the agricultural land can support crops.  They have high rainfall and plenty of rivers, and thanks to the Himalayas and Mongolian plateau there is plenty of erodable material to provide fertile river valleys. Lots of productive land means lots of food which allows more people to be supported.\n\n4) They are ancient cultures that have never been destroyed. Both nations have been civilized for the last 8, 000 years at least. That means that the people have already largely perfected agriculture and their culture has attuned itself to that lifestyle,  the eland has already been cleared and the infrastructure established to maintain the nation. Compare that to nations like Brazil or Mexico that, while they are also large and potentially productive tropical nations but where civilization recently for most of the country and where the indigenous culture was demolished. Those countries are starting from scratch and need to clear land, build roads and canals and even develop an appropriate culture for their environment. That limits the productivity of the land and thus the population. However Brazil is expected to surpass Chin in population size within the next 5 generations.\n\n\n5) They have low standards of living. That means limited access to education, limited health care, limited career prospects. Under those circumstances people will always have more children because so many children die, and because there is no advantage to having just a few children. That means that the population growth is always near maximum. Compare that to a developed nations like the US where it is rare for a child to die and where a child has better prospects of getting a good education and a good job if they have fewer siblings. As standards of living rise so people have fewer children. At this stage the SOL for most of India and China are so low that people are still having as many children as possible. \n\n\nWhenever you get a big, tropical underdeveloped nation with a lot of agricultural you are going to get huge populations just because the people can.  Brazil is well on its way to becoming the next China or India because it has precisely the same factors applying to it. The only reason it isn’t already huge is because the population and culture were decimated just a few centuries
797467
Tea Act\n\n(1773) British legislation giving a tea monopoly in the American colonies to the British East India Co. It adjusted the duty regulations to allow the failing company to sell its large tea surplus below the prices charged by colonial competitors. The act was opposed by colonists as another example of taxation without representation. Resistance to the act resulted in the\nIncident on Dec. 16, 1773, in which American patriots dressed as Indians threw 342 chests of tea from three British ships into Boston Harbour. Their leader was Samuel Adams. The action was taken to prevent the payment of a British-imposed tax on tea and to protest the British monopoly of the colonial tea trade authorized by the Tea Act. In retaliation, Parliament passed the punitive Intolerable Acts, which further united the colonies in their opposition to the British.
770091
We English do love our cup of tea but I think the correct answer is probably China as there are so many more tea drinkers there.
834830
All three, growth is slowing in North America, health conscience, aging, population ect.\n\nNew Markets; Asia - China.\nThey love kentucky, Macdonalds and starbucks is in Beijin.
933681
"The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (pronounced [pɛnsl̩ˈveɪnjə] or [pɛnsl̩ˈveɪniə]) is a state in the northeastern part of the United States.\n\n"Pennsylvania has been known as the Quaker State since 1776; prior to that, it was known as the Quaker Province,[2] in recognition of Quaker[3] William Penn's First Frame of Government[4] constitution for Pennsylvania that guaranteed liberty of conscience. Penn knew of the hostility[5] Quakers faced when they opposed rituals, oaths, violence, and ostentatious frippery.[6]\n\n"Pennsylvania has also been known as the Keystone State since 1802,[7] based in part upon its central location among the original Thirteen Colonies forming the United States.[7] Pennsylvania, however is not only geographically the keystone state, but economically as well, having both the industry common to the North, making such wares as Conestoga wagons[8] and rifles,[9] and the agriculture common to the South, producing feed, fiber, food, and tobacco.[10]"
225675
Visit the Mayfield Dairy farm or processing plant. There is one here in Georgia.