Criminal Procedure Quiz: Is there something wrong with this series of procedure?
544119
Yes, the several things are in the wrong order.A few steps left out (initial appearance, bond forfeiture hearing, initial pre-trial conference, etc).  If this is your lawyer's flow chart you are in big trouble.
795194
I did and won.  The guy prosecuting made the whole thing up about cationing me and it was all lies - my age, phone number, tv details the whole lot.  I pleaded not guilty and got a new court date and TV licensing dropped the case 1 day before due in court.  You can go not guilty if you dont have a tv or if they've lied like above. Good luck - try it what have you got to lose ????
777255
OK, here's the deal on the polygraph. They do NOT just ask you questions out of the blue. They will have 10 to 15 questions that they will discuss with you before the exam. Answer them truthfully. Once the examiner decides that everything has been discussed. The test will begin. They will ask what they call base line questions. Your name age whatever. They will tell you to respond to all questions asked for the baseline to be yes or no, depending on the examiner. The examiner will probably show you the response to your false answers. This is to show you that the test does in fact work. Kinda like messing with your head.\n In the case of drug use, the question will be something along the lines " other than the incidents that were discussed, have you ever used....." They will not ask the discussed questions in the same order as when they are discussed to keep you a bit off balance.\n\nThe polygraph is NEVER like what you see on TV\n\nGood Luck!
621108
This question is vague and ambiguous, overly broad and unduly burdensome. The question contains a false, misleading or question begging presuposition, the question assumes facts not in evidence, the question seeks information that is not relevant and is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, the question is incomprehensible. \n\nThere are many others that couls apply, generally any objection that could be used in trial if the same question is asked.
772383
Sounds like you are planning a crime.\n\nNo help with that here.\n\n///
510483
the warrant was issued in good faith, so there is nothing wrong with it.  the accuser made a mistake when the guessed the height ant weight.  that happens a lot.  my weight is missed guessed all the time as lower then it is.  As long as the warrant was issued in good faith there is nothing wrong, the defense can challenge it but it will not go to far.
752630
That there is something wrong with him is not new information.\nHe is just looking for a way to make money, get attention and say ha ha-since he can't be accused of a murder that he was already acquited of. Stupid stupid stupid jury-they are the ones that there is/was really something wrong with, don't ya think!
936160
You have notw ritten well in the exam. And that is the cause of your worry. Probably you know the answer as well. But damage is already done. So just relax and wait for the verdict.
404772
Indeed. Yes and no questions can be VERY deceiving. They can mean anything, which is why the prosecution or defense would strictly ask yes or no... It's a way to trick the jury. All questions can't simply be answered with a yes or no.
307210
As a person who is no stranger to our "justice system". I had about 5 cases at one time when they got in front of a judge he dismissed them because the police dont do (or lack of )investigation . They are real quick to throw you in jail and slap a case on you. Most of the police are under trained (except in the firearm training)shoot first, ask questions later.
797410
Too many issues to open that can of worms. However, there are some loopholes in the current system, for example it may be possible to bring different charges for the same crime like manslaughter instead of murder, depends on your luck with the judge since much of law today is judicial discretion & bench precedent. It a person gets off and then confesses (on tape, provable), if that person testified at the trial and said they were innocent, s/he could be charged with perjury among other things. It would be very foolish to confess though, because even if the person gets off legally, there are still civil lawsuits and consequences that are not so easily dismissed.
837268
1.  C  Correct   \n  2.  B  Correct   \n  3.  A  Correct   \n  4.  D  Correct   \n  5.  C  Correct   \n  6.  B  A  PAGE 17-23  \n  7.  C  Correct   \n  8.  A  Correct   \n  9.  B  Correct   \n  10.  C  Correct   \n  11.  D  Correct   \n  12.  A  Correct   \n  13.  D  Correct   \n  14.  A  Correct   \n  15.  C  Correct   \n  16.  D  Correct   \n  17.  B  C  PAGE 1-23  \n  18.  A  B  PAGE 17-23  \n  19.  B  Correct   \n  20.  A  Correct   \n  21.  C  Correct   \n  22.  C  Correct   \n  23.  B  Correct   \n  24.  C  Correct   \n  25.  B  Correct
498773
I'm pretty sure that your conviction is 'spent' in that it was more than 2 years ago but I would double check this and also it's not related to anything regarding paedophilia which would totally bar you. Try talking to a tutor on your course, they will guide you. Good luck!
535742
On applications I've seen, it usually asks about the previous 5, 7, or maybe 10 years.  If it asks if you have "ever" been convicted of a crime then you should answer honestly--or maybe just consider applying only at jobs that don't look back that far.\n\nAt the bottom of the application near the signature portion, it usually mentions that lying is perjury...another felony.\n\nIf the issue does come up at an interview, then be frank, be remorseful (hopefully that's authentic), and try to move past the question quickly.  The longer you dwell on the answer to try to soften it up, the more opportunity there is to slip up and give a worse impression about it.
123877
The previous answer was good except "how" was forgotten. Also, the officers actions relating to the investigation and the disposition of the case.
278873
What made you think that way? May be you have some personal experiences. But a corruption is not a one way process its a two way process, so we are also to an extent responsible if such is the case. as far as incompetency is concerned, if a person is in police department then he must have cleared the rigorous tests before entering in here which is similar to every one so it would be wrong to say that they are incompetent.
110946
of course it would affect your case..it can give you a good chance not to be convicted, right? unles it's a typographical error ;), kidding aside...such concern is critical and having a wrong last name on paperwork is a big matter to consider!