Has anyone heard about a country called Pakistan?If yes,what do u think of it and why?
549290
Yes. I feel PK is making good progress toward modernization, and Have been helpful in our war on terror.I've known several bussiness owners who came here from Pakistan and they were all good people.
935353
It was a bad idea in 1947 and it is a bad idea 2day.Have u not read about the mass murders and rapes committed by the paki army in Bangladesh before the Indian army(responding to cry es of help from its neighbour) moved in and kicked there butt all the way back 2 pakistan.The bangladeshis and the pakistanis both suffer from a bad memory.
885855
Pakistan has a long way to go to upset history. Personally if that happened, they had a superpower like the US to help them pull that off.\n\nDon't see the US   doing that, period!\n\nPeople who can lie, cheat, and kill to try to move ahead don't do very well at the end of any matter.\n\njust an observation
1003768
i am pretty sure u wont like this answer and itsnt worth the effort, but still i will answer it.\n\nis india afraid of pakistan??\nthe answer is yes\n\nwhy should not we be?? the country has got a nuke. the country is ruled by its military.  next change may bring in religious fundamentalists to power,\nso why should not we be afraid.\n\nunlike pakistan we cant allow our citizens to be killed by another country(as the usa continuously raids targets inside pak and keeps on killing their citizens)\n\nwe are not foolish enough to send our soldiers to a war which is not necessary(which we can win in the end) and loose their precious lives.\n\nif u take the above factors into consideration yes we are afraid.\n\nu know i was always weak at history but seems u never even studied it!!\n\ncan u please enlighten me which war ended in equality\n\n1948:- when india gained control of kashmir\n\n1965- when pakistan had to run around in the world to find a negotiator\n\n1971- when 90000 of ur soldiers surrendered to our army and needless to mention u lost east pakistan\n\nnow we come to kargil\n\nfirst of all can u kindly tell me whether it was pakistani military in kargil or just mercenaries.\n\ni am not disagreeing with u when u say that it was pakistani army.\n\nits just that the govt of pakistan didnt have the guts to acknowledge those people as its soldiers.\n\npakistan is really a very strong country one which cant even claim back the bodies of its soldiers and give them decent burial.\n\nif pakistan is really so strong then why does it have to send its soldiers in disguise,\n\ni mean 1948:-tribals who somehow had mortars\n\n1999:-mercenaries who somehow had got hold of pakistani army identification.\n\ni am gonna skip the china part thats another story\n\ni am not hoping for a best answer but if u think it is worth it i will only be too glad   ;)
100572
All I know is India and Pakistan have a region between them called Jamo & Kashmir and they fight there like hell.\nSo what's the point?\nI hope they don't end up nuking each other. I really like India.
863408
I hate it when people call me paki because im not a pakistani im Bengali,they should really know where people are from before they call them paki,just because they're  brown doesn't mean they are all from pakistan,there are brown people all around the world.Thats why I find it offensive,if you know what i mean.
641952
Short answer: The worst kind\n\nComplicated but politically correct answer: Its a republic. The previous answer sums it up, although throughout much of pakistan's history they've had a military ruler often bordering a dictator-like manner of rule.`\n\nThere are several reasons for pakistan's democracy's failure to perform:\n1) The military has been an important influence in the country because of the 3 wars with India and American funding to support the Taliban militarily in the 80s.\n\n2) Corruption is rampant and many political leaders are uneducated. The educated have very little patience for politics and those that do join politics end up leading organizations like the MQM, an almost separatist movement.\n\n3) Pakistan has never had the opportunity to develop a good model of democracy. The country's founder, the man with the main vision died soon after independence and ever since pakistanis have been debating whether he intended Pakistan to be an Islamic nation with Islamic laws, or a nation of muslims with secular laws.\n\n4) Pakistan is a very diverse country in terms of religion (many sects of islam and other religious minorities), ethnicity, education, and income. Makes it harder to get to a common ground. While the same can be said about the US, keep in mind that the US has had constant waves of immigration form different parts of the world for over 200 years. Pakistan on the other hand practically had 500,000 people move there from india within the space of 1 to 2 years.
98213
Pakistan has been an active member in the ABSG <Against ‘Buttercup’ Society of Giraffes> the CENTO <Creepy Egocentric Narcissus Tope Organization> and the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO). Pakistan is also an important member of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) <other wise referred to as the Anti-South Park militia>. Pakistan has used the Anti-South Park militia as a forum for Enlightened Moderation [3], its plan to promote a take a rain check and elucidation in the Islamic world. Besides the Anti South Park militia, Pakistan is a member of the South Asian union of SAARC. The Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) <also known as whoa daddy got some deep pockets> is another major regional organization seeking to promote socio-economic development. Pakistan's status as the only Islamic nation to be a declared nuclear power plays a significant role in international affairs.\n\nForeign relations with the United States have seen as a roller coaster <which has killed many> throughout the history of Pakistan. In the early 1950s, Pakistan's leaders called the country the United States "most allied ally in Asia"[4]. During the Soviet-Afghan war in the 1980s and following the September 11 attacks, Pakistan remained a crucial ally. However, between crises relations have soured with sanctions being applied by the United States, once during the 1965 war with India and again following Pakistan's nuclear tests in 1998.\n\nPakistan has had difficult relations with neighboring arch-rival India with the two countries fighting three wars <after the large migration of Irish Workers impregnated their women and introduced Pakisanians to green beer> and coming to the verge of a nuclear war <like we need more halaback girls right???> on other occasions. The long-running border dispute over Kashmir resulted in war in 1947 and 1965. A third war <we now introduce the Russian’s with their Vodka> was fought alongside the Bangladeshi Liberation War in 1971. India's decision to conduct nuclear tests in 1998 immediately prompted Pakistan to test its own.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan#Foreign_relations
406272
Pakistan have forur provinces.Punjab,Sindh,Sarhad(NWFP) and Balochistan.\nState of Free Kashmir is a autonomuos.\nFata area is tribal land, adminstrated by fedral government.
1045247
Look at history!\nPakistan and India, as well as Bangladesh, are the same people, they were the same state for thousands of years, until British decided to step in. When the Hindu people throw them out, the British intelligence provoked a civil war and the three states were created! Thus, in the last 5 decades there are the problems between them, especially between Pakistan and India!\nI think that the problems continue because there is outside "help"! Without it, the two sister countries would have resolved all matters and would not need to fight for anything!
470665
pakistan ios best at the moment but we can,t say how long more. becase they always play for mony but if they play a good game they are bet less.
114474
well , the problem that the authority of Pakistan is too weak to contol the country, or we can say that pakistan is too big for its government to handle, besides, the lack of education esp in the remote areas of Pakistan makes its people to be convinced by any ideas if the ideas look worm enough..pressing on the culture of the skin (where no other clture is there than religion)...People there feel very vicimized by the poverty and the lack of education (again i press on the lack of education)..it is easy to pritsh them radical idea based on patience and waiting for the other life with lots of hope(as they are sufferring already in this life)  Solution: Education (by educated people ,real educated ones)..the education will lead to production  and freedom  , and that will lead to have financial stabilty.. which leads to enjoy and love life..any forcable solution in my opinion will lead to more extreme in ideas  ...
126165
No I think its the other way around....India has been for the most part good to the united states... Pakistan is just friends... we do alot of traiding with.
1003123
no but pakistan and india were one nation in the past and the british led to their division which was very depressing and awful as their were massacres all around as people of hindu and muslim religion were just running towards the indian and pakistani parts (now) respectively.
255578
universities? pakistan? \n\nit is oxymoron
617102
Pakistan = a normal country like others\nMuslims  = followers of the religion Islam (2nd most popular religion in the world)
623837
I'm not sure of the answer, but wikipedia might! go to http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki  and search for Pakistan or "fruit lassi" or both and see what they say.