What is "politcization of crime"?
537630
Politicization of crime refers to politicians pandering to the emotions of voters rather than proposing effective solutions.\n\nDrug laws are the direct result of politicizing the issue.\n\n"Terrorist laws" are being implemented based on politics rather than effective solutions.\n\nThe common term is "tough on crime."
126399
One way would be to eliminate all laws. No laws, no breaking of laws. But that's probably not what you're looking for.\n\nYou need to examine what causes crime. Laziness, poverty, greed, passionate feelings, etc. Then you need to develop a theory on how to get rid of the causes.
55054
You sound like you are a libertarian. They believe in things like less government and relaxed drug laws. On their website there is even a quiz to tell you what you are politically. The quiz is on the top left of the page listed.
282998
There are several.  First, it is less of a theory (which requires explicitly testable hypotheses, etc.) and more of a perspective on deviance.  More than this, at a conceptual level, it dehumanizes the deviant, as it seems to imply that the fate of a person is determined by the label applied by another.  It also does not seem to distinguish between non-normative behavior such as homosexuality and more malevolent types such mass murder, etc.  In any case, it draws unreaslistic policy implications (drastic overhaul of the criminal justice system, etc.), and in that sense is quite radical...
786613
After giving this a lot of thought I have decided that political correctedness actually keeps every one talking about what to call a problem instead of talking about the problem. It appears to be a terminal condition in the USA. When I see rapists and murderers "get off" because of political correctedness or I see violence and hate crimes acted out because of political correctedness or innocent people killed in an abortion clinic bombing because of political correctedness - I need no further proof that it does not benefit the USA.\n\nGreat topic for discussion.
1115803
None of the above. It is a  mandatory and extended period of incarceration to persons who have been convicted of a serious criminal offense on three or more separate occasions. These statutes became very popular in the 1990s. It applies to those who are chronic criminals.
1096871
The American political landscape is much more diversified than being simply Republican, Democratic, liberal, or conservative.  I for one, subscribe to a more libertarian philosophy.  \n\nI believe that the government's sole purpose is to exist for the benefit of its citizens in as noninvasive a way as possible.  To accomplish this, the government's power should be very limited and law enforcement should cease to focus on what we might call "victimless" crimes that impede their ability to process and punish legitimate criminals.\n\nIn places where my views stray from the Libertarian platform, I generally side with conservatives (NOT post-Reagan neo-conservatives) who tend to agree with my commitment to free markets, a loosely regulated economy, and small government.
892491
It already has gone beyond molding into control, laws are passed daily which makes new criminals out of law abiding citizens, laws against personal or medical use of marijuana for example, in many states oral sex with your spouce is illegal, gee lock me up throw away the key for being a reapeat offender there! Laws are too numerious to mention, but yes the goverment has its idea of the dumb non questioning them ordiary citizen and is locking up non conformiss left and right, which is not demoracy
902417
Thank Billy Liar and his sponging parasite wife in conjunction with the woolly minded liberals in Brussels. Together they have taken the heart from our country, changed the meaning of "community" into ethnic no go areas and given power to the drunken lout underclass, some of whom will one day be MP's.\n\nA police "presence" in your town will only target you as a criminal because you stand up for decency and civic responsibility. I despair of this country, the lunatics really have take over the asylum.
869321
No. Around here a big deal crime is drunk driving or petty vandalism. Around the nearest big city it is drive-by gang shootings setting new highs in the murder rate.
165542
The answer is greed. Organize and strike. Hit the streets in protest's. There is no other effective means for change.\nOrganized crime is alive and well in America, Some call it State, Local and Federal Goverment.
984334
Everything seems to be going that way. With every new law passed great strides are being made in that direction. Exactly the same in US and UK.\nBut what else can you expect when the same evil organisation owns the Federal Reserve, controls all political parties, manages the medical systems, organises all education, controls oil, controls food, controls water, is in charge of the military and secret services,  manipulates the value of the dollar, runs the drug cartels - both legal and illegal, etc etc.\nIt is already a police state - but done so subtly that nobody realises it. Its just a little extra each day, so gentle that it is all accepted.\nNow the situation is that absolutely anybody can be decalered an enemy combatant, arrested under laws of terrorism, imprisoned without charge for the rest of their lives, with no recourse to law. Isn't that  a fair definition of a police state!
168139
Try to find something about corruption in politics, I think you`ll find some interesting news. :)) OR Government structure and agreement beetwen political parties - they`ve got troubles with understand eachother. Anyway, Could you specify what kind of revolution are you looking for? The biggest and known recent scandal is "Rywin Gate".
1117760
racism is an opinion that often precedes a crime.
775876
significa la definicion de actos relacionados con cualquier tipo de crimen ,robo,y todo acto clasificado por el sistema de justicia\ncomo crimen o delitos
977904
No it's probably time for a rational review of drug laws. But don't count on our politicians to propose changes. They can't be seen as "soft on crime". Better to build more jails and get reelected than to solve our society's problems.
158957
Who said Urbanization is wrong.\n\nSome cities decay because of crooked politicians.\n\nGood politicians will actually help their cities, for example New York City was infested with Crime, well there is still some crime there but when Rudy Guiliani was Mayor of NYC he cleaned out a lot of crime in NYC.\n\nEver since the Guiliani era in NYC it is safer to go to Central Park at night than it use to be.