Has anyone seen MI 3?  Is it a must see movie?
548049
I agree that Tom Cruise is a little bit out there lately, but the man knows acting!!!!  I thought this movie was great!!!  The story was much more exciting than the last two, and the action was fabulous.  I think one of the best things about it were the locations they filmed in absolutely beautiful.  If you like hard core action, and a slightly unrealistic story this movie is definitely for you!!!
378331
I Give It A ****4 STARS out of 5\n\n"There is no coincidence, only the illusion of coincidence," gravely says the masked hero of "V for Vendetta" half way through the film. \n\nIt is certainly no coincidence that a film written and produced by Andy and Larry Wachowski of "The Matrix" would feature such dialogue, along with a few impressive action sequences, spectacular pyrotechnics and an always-adept Hugo Weaving. That much is par for the course. \n\nBut the film is notable for the questions it raises. Is it coincidence that the flag for a futuristic London bears a symbol reminiscent of the swastika? That the aforementioned hero – the concisely named V – is, in fact, a terrorist? Or that characters in the film draw noticeable parallels to Western politicians? \n\nUnlike other recent comic-book-based movies, "V for Vendetta" is a political thriller of science-fiction proportions. Set in 2020 in a totalitarian England, rooted in over-the-top commentary of Western government and riddled with visual metaphors, "Vendetta" is successfully both action-packed and politically confrontational. \n\nBased on the graphic novel created by Alan Moore and David Lloyd, the film begins and ends with the Nov. 5 fireworks celebration of Guy Fawkes Day. Fawkes, a Catholic conspirator who tried to blow up Parliament in 1605 and was eventually hanged, serves as an ongoing symbol throughout the film and an inspiration for V and his deeds. \n\nThe plot follows the masked murderer as he skillfully and systematically avenges what we learn is a painful personal history in a neofascist state of Big-Brother-like laws run by Chancellor Adam Sutler (John Hurt). And though V's vendetta against his society is innately personal, it becomes one of universal importance, first enthralling the strong-minded Evey (Natalie Portman) and eventually the entire city. \n\nEven as his face is hidden by the mask's disturbing smile, Weaving ("The Lord of the Rings," "The Matrix") plays V convincingly. His rich and charismatic voice conveys an interplay of sarcastic wit and gleeful malevolence. The actor's background in stage drama undoubtedly informs the theatrical movements of a man who views society as his own personal stage. \n\nThough Portman loses her flowing locks halfway through the film, her performance only gains intensity. Her English accent isn't faultless, but she continues her knack of emerging as the heart of her films. \n\nDespite these performances and a remarkably intelligent script, "Vendetta" is mostly devoid of human emotion. The story may be character-based, but London 2020 is conspicuously inhuman. Giant speakers line the streets announcing the nightly curfew. Television, more than human contact, is the most prominent method of communication. Any controversial, multifaceted remnants of human history have been banned – anyone who owns an African statue or a copy of the Koran is a sinner at best. \n\nThus, though it carefully investigates issues of morality, tyranny and individuality and sometimes delves into the personal and painful histories of its characters, the film does not elicit emotional reaction until its climax, when the anxiety building throughout the film is suddenly and finally relieved. \n\nUltimately, given a powerfully fitting musical score by Dario Marianelli ("Pride and Prejudice"), vibrant cinematography by the late Adrian Biddle ("Aliens" & "The Mummy") and a restrained downplay of special effects, "V for Vendetta" is downright strange – quietly discomforting, yet refreshingly provocative.
371299
It was a pretty good movie,\nwith similar twists and surprises as the first.\nI personally think it wasn't as good as the first,\nbut definitely a must see for the fans of the original!
686396
YES!\n\nits BLOODY BRILLIANT.\n\nAND its directed by a CHINESE MAN!\n\nGO ASIANS!\n\nand yes its really really superfantabulous. \n\nonly so many controversial movies make it.\n\nand this definitely  is one of them.\n\nits just brilliant.\n\neach character is played out so well.\n\nleave all your judgemental behind cuz this movie is just a MUST SEE
847018
I got to see the advance screening of this movie too, way in advance though it wasn't a star studded screening.\n\nAbout the movie, one thing must be said is that this movie is really interesting and mysterious though it cannot be compared to other movies like saw, mindhunters as this movie does not have gore at all.\n\nIt can be compared to the butterfly effect as it has that supernatural kind of story which is very well written and i will go on to say that to me this was better than the butterfly effect. Most importantly the acting is top of the line from all the actors specially Sarah's. The way this movie is directed is also very intriguing and i really have to admire Asif's direction.\n\nWell if you want to watch an amazing, interesting and kind of a thriller movie you must watch this as it is certainly worth a watch.
486082
I don't know what kind of movie you like. I watched Mission Impossible 3 last week and The Da Vinci Code last night. They both were great to watch.
365953
It was good.  I watched it at the drive in back this past summer/spring.  I plan to watch it again.  It wasn't the best romantic movie that I ever saw but it was one worth recommending.
1104562
I have. I enjoyed it very much. It was great to see many spiritual concepts being shown and discussed in a movie, a rare treat these days. I had to watch it twice to digest it all.
76467
Hero is absolutely amazing. \n\nKung Fu Hustle is hilarious.\n\nHaven't seen House of Flying Daggers yet.\n\nHit me back.\nkeptcompany@yahoo.com
959948
I AGREE with you  this is the best bond movie yet... I totally enjoyed the movie except the poker games which I do not understand poker were a bit too long but I guess they needed hence the film tital\nI am looking forward to the next one....
488921
Great actors \nGreat movie
256948
This Movie is amazing.\n\nI first watched it in 1996 in a D.C. theatre. \n\nI realy suggest everyone watch it, it's interesting that you liked it too. \n\nI've looked it up though and it's "not in stock".\n\nStrange.
906719
I enjoyed it far more than I was expecting to. Don't listen to anyone who tells you that a blond northern bloke can't play Bond. He does a fantastic job \n\nGo and see it, you won't regret it !
705953
Yeah i purchased it on DVD  the other day. as i never got a chance to catch it at the cinemas. And what i would say is that it's good however as the media had portrayed it of being the best out of the three. I didn't think it was that good to be able to say that. Some of the action scenes are good but could've been better. And it can never be compared to James Bond as 007 is a 45 year old franchise and still doing extremely well. Have you seen Casino Royale?........... you'll realise the difference if you've watched it. Ian Fleming the guy who created Bond was i would say a genious who created a character that has so many different shades and is loved by people all around the world. Tom Cruises Mission Impossible Franchise just can't come even close to James Bond. \n\nI don't know what Cruise thought that lets make an american spy movie francise but the answer is no.
448002
It's a good movie. But if it didn't capture you I really can't see the point in you rewatching.\n\nAnd redwing - don't be a plonker. Do you think he really put his willy up Jake Gyllenhaals bum? Good grief! Are you going to stop watching films where married actors and actresses have screen sex with people who aren't their real life partners? Or wathing court room thrillers because the actors have no legal experience? Or Hoffman (both of them) movies because neither or them really pretend to be women/are drag queens? I'm sure Robert Englund would REALLY have stalked teenagers and killed them in thier dreams. Most actors will at some point in their careers do something they wouldn't normally do! Get a grip woman! I've never heard anything so bloody stupid in my life ....
885565
Yes, I saw it... It was very good!! *smile*\n\nI cried after the movie, because it brought to remembrance how God loves His people so much and that He guides the paths of those that trust in Him....\n\nThe one who played Esther is so pretty. I will buy the DVD when they start selling them.
768738
Saw the new James Bond movie tonight. Other than being a bit long at about 2 1/2 hrs., I thought it was excellent.\n\nFantastic scenery, great (if somewhat exaggerated!) action sequences, good storyline, and Daniel Craig was really, really good.! Not sissyish or too suave. He is a great choice to play Bond.