why india want natural gas from iran when india always voting against iran in un?
550693
Because when it comes to energy, you get it from where ever you can as cheaply as you can.  This is why Bush invaded Iraq after all.  So he can have cheap oil for his Families Oil Companies, so they can sell the oil products to Americans at high prices and become even richer and more powerful than they already are!
359647
That's a misconception.  As much as I dislike the current US government, I must say that they do not resist nuclear power in Iran.  They, along with most other democratic governments, do not approve of the type of reactors that Iran is building.  \n\nIran is developing "breeder" reactors and  making enriched uranium, whose only "reasonable" application is weaponry.  If Iran were truly interested in nuclear reactors for domestic power there are a number of different designs that are cheaper and more efficient, and don't create weapons.
678163
well fo sure ........nobody knows. but the most likely reason can be to gain international respect vis-a-vis united states as it happened in the case of india . also to have a dominating position in the midle east given its complex geopolitical situation and also have an upper hand with respect to israel. dont forget israel also has nuclear weapons but nobody is concerned about that.........
1034779
We have already done it and it works.\nIran didn't / doesn't sell oil and gas to US companies directly (Perhaps they buy our oil and gas of other brokers) also we don't buy anything of them for more than 27 years.\nUsually, US threats other independent countries to boycotting them and I can tell you, we don't have any problem.\nActually, these situations are became us more independent.\nRecently, Iran is going to sell its oil and gas with other currencies, such as Euro, etc. This act can involve US aggressive policy with some new troubles ;)\n\nIran didn't / doesn't accredit Israel. We don't accredit any other country in that region except of Palestine. So Iran didn't / doesn't have any business with Israelis.\nIran ignored them for ever.\n\nAlso, US invaded and occupied Iraq just for oil and control over "Persian Gulf" as a strategic place where some oil and gas producers are there.\nObviously they want to have enough control over oil producers and oil consumers, including China, India, Japan, Korea, Western European countries, etc.
280617
I agree. for 10 pints.\nevery country can have this energy in good way.\ni think that iran wants that for producing electricity and other kind of energy.
602686
you don't understand the situation. US believes Iran will use it's nuclear technology to build nuclear weapons. Iran is using it for energy and Iran is allowing UN to inspect it's nuclear facilities. Only why there is a controversy is because US believes Iran will attack Israel with nuclear weapons and US is putting on the pressure to make sure Iran does not have any nuclear weapons.
253985
If iran is heading for Nuclear power,then the reason is basically to start thinking of ways to produce alternate energy.They know it very well that Oil is not gonna stay there forever and now is the time,though already late but not too late,to start initiating a different source.And,its also to notice that<u just cant use the nuclear energy instantly,u have go through all the tests that goes on for years finally b4 you are actually using the product commercially.US has its own reserve of oil which is biiiig as well,but they prefer to finish off the reserve of the rest of the world first with its monopoly themes and will start rigging full fledged then.Imposing a threat alarm on Iran is nothing but gathering the world opinion to go for a war and start selling stock pile of new weapons and buying oil from Iran with lower price when UN imposes sanction after the first stage of battle finishes.US has created the environment just like the british did when they were the masters of the universe.
432793
Essentially he wants as few countries to have nuclear weapons as possible, which he has in common with many other people on the planet. The more countries there are with Nukes, the more chance there is of one nation using them against another nation and therefore the more chance there is of global nuclear war, which no-one wants.\n\nHe's being very loud about Iran (and North Korea) because they are "Unfriendly" states, i.e. They don't like America, nor in fact any of the Western Countries. But it's not as if it's just him, many European nations are lobbying very hard to stop those 2 nations getting nuclear weapons as well. Essentially the main worry is that Iran's connections to extremist Muslim paramilitary groups (or Terrorists if you prefer) will cause them to start supplying nuclear weapons to them, which they'll use against targets in the West. There's also the whole Israel problem, the president of Iran has been very clear in his opinions of Israel (he despises them and wants to destroy them), if he gets his hands on Nukes and uses them on Israel, then the whole world could go down the toilet.\n\nThe reason he's not going on about India (or Pakistan) is because they already HAVE nuclear weapons, so there's not much point trying to take them away now.
135723
Military - India has a larger military but Iran probably has more weapons from the black market. India as a nuclear weapon while Iran is trying to develop nuclear capabitlities. Iran is probably more prepared for war than India and will have more domestic support for war given its most recent history. \n\nEconomy - India has a larger economy with a strong base due to the population and much brighter potential to be a top 3 in 20 years riding on the back of IT. Iran has 15% of the wold's oil but no domestic industry. \n\nGlobal Influence - Iran has more global influence than India. Given its current course in nuclear development, it is more likely to sway power in the region than India. Having said that, India is the leading outsource provider in the world and any dent in its capability would have a significant impact on the global economy.
409401
Iran has every right to enrich uranium for energy purposes because it is a member of the N-NPT (Nuclear non-perliferation Treaty). This treaty guarantees this right. \n\nIronically, Bush told India, who has refused to sign the N-NPT, they could enrich uranium. This creates a very complicated dilema.\n\nAdditionally, if you examine Iran's history, Iran has no history of aggression but rather of defense. Iran has also held to all regulations of the NPT to include full access to all uranium enrichment sites to all U.N. inspectors. \n\nThere is no evidence to support restricting Iran's right to enrich uranium in order to obtain nuclear energy. Also, keep in mind, Israel has nuclear weapons.
530820
debatable topic- lucrative business deal or subjugation at the hands of U.S.? i would say it is a mixture of both. this deal will help strengthen the relationship between the two countries. us is using India as a shield against china basically to keep a check on the growing power of china in Asia. from India's point of view the deal is good in some aspects. India is rich in thorium and the research for that technology is still underway. so it needs nuclear supply for the time being. however us has a history of back tracking from deals. and another point to be noted is that India has voted against Iran which might strain the relationship bw the two countries. and the question is whether India is loosing its independence to take international decisions and whether it is growing under us shadow.??
508780
because Israel is our ally and Iran is not.  it's all about hypocrisy.
700284
Yes, permanent membership is preferred. Without that\nno vote. India is a Major power in the world now .\n\n\nCheck out the US stand on this at the link.\n\nPermanent seat for India, yes.
99234
US has bought India's loyalty long ago when it allowed the country to build its nuclear arsenal.\n\nSo, India's going to betray a long-term economic and political ally (Iran). \n\nFrom this point of view various people can debate, loyalty vs opportunism. \nOn the other hand, India's position suggests lack of intelligence since it has taken such a position without having received any evidence that Iran is conducting a military nuclear programme (not to mention that even if it's the case, then Iran's nukes would support India).
364166
Pakistan and India are not run by Islamic Extremist that are bent on harming others outside their countries.  These two nations fear each other, but do not threaten Israel, the United States, Russia or Western Europe.  Iran does!
303576
I assume you are meaning.... should India get a permanent place in Security Council..... India already has a place in UN as long as it wants...\n\nYes India deserves a place in the Security council... the reason is obvious.... its shown the most matured performance in democracy in spite of being a very diverse nation in terms of religion... language.... geography... and so on.\n\nIndia has demonstrated a neat role as a Non aligned Nation. India showed that it could have a proper balance of Capitalism and Socialism... As a Nuclear nation India has behaved very very responsibly..\n\nThe biggest pool of trained manpower..... performing sustained democracy.... religious tolerance... emergent economy... original indigenous economic models... commitment to peace in spite of a diverse political lines... and above all a proven commitment on use of Military capabilities always for peaceful purposes.... PROOF ENOUGH TO SHOW THAT INDIA DESERVES A PLACE IN THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL
478733
Yep. If one nation posseses nuclear weapons, what gives it the right to forbid nuclear weapons to other nations? Dont get me wrong, I dont approve of any nuclear weapons at all, but if the Iranians want them, then its their right.\n\n\npeace