Do jackalopes exist, or ever existed?
551725
Jackalope is a fictional animal, the urban legends.  It's up to those gullible minded people to immerse in it.\n\nNo one's ever seen a living jackalope. Certainly there are no jackalopes in zoos or mounted in museums. (even there are displays, they are fake and concocted.) And there's never been any footage of the fabled hare with horns shown on wildlife shows or on reruns of "In Search Of."\n\nThat's because the jackalope doesn't exist. It's simply a hoax, a tall tale made up by cowboys in the 1800s to explain noises they heard at night while sitting around the campfire.
925665
Never heard of such a thing exist.
180452
OMIGOSH! I just SAW one! Its called johnfrog!\nJust joking...LOL\nNah, i dn't think so, but maybe one day..
589725
A cross between a jackal and a rat:  a jackrat.
902658
Yes, I have never seen any but I believe they can exist
707242
We have no proof that any of them existed, so is this a trick question?
1117486
don't the already exist?
811674
that is probably one of the most ridiculous things that i have ever read.\n\n(besides where would we be able to find them?)
1042971
What does it mean to exist? Do they have to breath air and run and poop and live and die to have existed? They exist in stories and legends and in all of our imaginations. Is that any less real? \n\nAs long as we can all still think and feel and dream, they will always be around.
947889
Oh they do exist. see  http://www.oregon.gov/BOLI/ATD/A_Itrade_Icarpenter.shtml\nSo they are "out there".....somewhere.....\nBut what is the question?
770654
I don't think any such monsters exist but yes maybe some ancient reptiles or other species(like coelacath which was thought to be extinct) maybe there.
801101
Well common sense, to me it sort of goes like this....\nALL mythology has some sort of real-world counterpart.  What this means is that essentially that all myths contain some sort of universal truth when you strip away the dross.  As far as mythological creatures are concerned, I do believe that some may have definantly existed.  To say things such as ancient mariners thought that manatees were mermaids is a bit presumptuous.  That's making a giant assumption, saying that we know what and how ancient mariners thought, which we obviously cannot know for a fact.  So called mythological creatures are being discovered all the time.  A few years back, a breed of deer was discovered in Asia that was thought to have been a mythological creature.  It was tiny and breathed through the sides of its snout instead of having a nose.  For centuries, science scoffed at its existence, until one day someone caught one...And science looked stupid, as it does so often by down-playing things that don't fit its paradigm.\nThe unicorn was a creature featured in the original painting of the creatures going into Noah's Ark, two by two...I believe that they were probably abundant somewhere in the wrld at one time, but got wiped out as so many species do.\nIN fact, we discover new species of creatures every single day...Fish we thought were extinct, thus becoming the realm of myth....Giant squid, Giant sharks (Aussie Coast), and a plethora of critters that by our own technical and scientific standards shouldn't even exist (all those little critters living along the Mariennes Trench in water that's well over the temperature  that's supposed to support life)....\nIn closing, my answer to you is a YES.  I do believe at one point the so called "mythological" creatures not only existed, but were common as well.  Hit some of the crypto zoology websites and you'll see what I mean about everything I've written....Sites that deal with forbidden history are also a great source of information.\nPEACE!
1024565
Complexity? Other than extinctions, most species still exist as they have. We have observe no mutations of single celled creatures, no transition phases in the fossil record, or anything else that would support evolutionary theory.\n  The evolutionary course of the horse for instance is still found in the tapir of South America. I could go on , and on.\n  Did you know the tooth they based Peking man on was actually from an extinct pig?!? However school books have not been revised. Evolutionist are still presenting this as "proof".
178668
I think they do exist somewhere but not on earth.\n\nAlso Nasa is wasting so much money to search for them.\n\nthere are only 2 options: the aliens are smarter, or the aliens are dumber.\n\nif they are smarter they will find us first, and if they are even more stupid then humans we dont need to find them.
938626
Few people think zombies actually exist. But many hold they are at least conceivable, and some that they are ‘logically’ or ‘metaphysically’ possible.\n\nhttp://consc.net/zombies.html\nhttp://zombies.monstrous.com/\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie\nhttp://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zombies/
947673
How many of these "alien" creatures do we find in reputable scientific research - NONE!  Nothing in any museum, no evidence, no bones, blood, fur or feathers, no stuffed animals, genuine photographs, or anything anywhere that science can touch. The Bigfoot is simply a continuation of the Native American legend, they also provided no evidence. Loch Ness monster - no evidence, Yeti -  no evidence, Chupacabra , sorry superstitious Puerto Ricans, but no proof ! We have out there a ZOO full of alien animals - that no person can prove !
771201
It is not possible that man knows everything so there is a strong possibility that these creatures do exist. I certainly hope so any way.