realtime use of virtual functions?
442464
more info will be usefull...
944245
If you've a variable outside of a function (and I'm guessing that could be any code block, like a for loop or similar) you can access the outside variable by using the global keyword:\n\nfunction my_func() {\nglobal $var;\n...do something with $var;\n}\n\n$var = 'blah';\nmy_func();\n\nAs an aside, you can use another type called 'static' which allows the variabe to retain it's value between function calls:\n\ncould be any code block, like a for loop or similar) you can access the outside variable by using the global keyword:\n\nfunction my_func() {\nstatic $var;\n++$var;\n}\n\n$var = 'blah';\nmy_func();\n\nIn that case $var is incremented, so the next time the function is called $var retains it's incremented value.\n\nAnd I added that to this answer because I'm fat-headed about my profundity.  Have a nice day.
209293
well for a custom program\n if u know mfc then try using it\n\nif not go to the qt lib and learn it
38184
skyhound.com/realtime
154421
Include the Threading namespace in your class.  Then, you can create a new thread, assign it an address of the function or sub you want to run and let it go do its thing.  For a quick-and-dirty way of doing it, you can also use the ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem and have it run through a sub for you on a seperate thread.  \n\nGenerally speaking, if you want to have your thread looping continually through the life of your application, I would declare a thread, and run it that way...you have more control.  However, if you just want to run something once and be done with it (say, for example, a database update), I'd use the threadpool.\n\nHowever, you should be aware that there's a whole new can of worms that open up to developers who use threading for the first time.  Because you have the posibility of two threads trying to access the same object at the same time, you have the potential for thread-locks.  So you have to use things like mutex and synclock to guard against your application locking up.  Also, you can't access GUI controls from a thread other than the one that created them.  Sure, you can probably get away with it most of the time...but your application will randomly hang and you'll bang your head for MONTHS trying to figure out why (trust me on this!).  To prevent this, look at creating delegates and accessing the GUI object ONLY from the delegates.\n\nYou can look up all of these topics on MSDN and find lots of information and samples on how to do all of this.  There's a LOT to doing a multi-threaded application, but hopefully this will get you started!\n\nGood luck,\nDan
449935
There is no such thing as an Abstract Interface.\n\nInterfaces are not supported with (ISO) C++. You should use an abstract class with only virtual methods.\n\nA .tlb file is (I'm guessing) a Type Library. These are used with COM/ActiveX controls. \n\nType of Visual Studio project: .... a C++ project I guess\n\nIf you are using managed C++, you can just add a reference to the COM object, which should add a RCW you can use (a wrapper around the object referenced). This will do most housekeeping for COM/ActiveX objects for you.
703938
use actionscripts\n\nCheers !!!!
623517
Visual Studio contains some tools to let you do this. I haven't personally done this (my engineers do, however). I've listed a couple links below that might help.
1034291
is this ASP.NET?\n\ntry creating a function wrapper that verifies that an object is active before firing the event, if the event is being fired before the page is loaded it doesn't have the DOM to locate the control
643183
You could try TNTSMS: http://www.tntsms.com/funstuff/
73050
Here is an example of how to do it in C++.\nAssume you want to use have a DLL named MyDll.dll, which contains a function, \n\nbool Function1(int)\n\n...\ntypedef bool Function1(int);\ntypedef Function1* pFunction1;\n\n...\n\nHMODULE DLLHandle;\nDLLHandle = LoadLibrary("MyDll.dll");\n\npFunction1 pF1 = (pFunction1)  GetProcAddress (DLLHandle,"Function1");\n...\nto call:\n   bool bSuccess = pF1(1);
696666
Store the last operation as a module level variable or a static variable within the procedure.\n\nBetter yet - build a property for the form called last operation and then every time you hit divide/add/subtract/multiply just store that operation. Then on the equals check for the property you created.\n\nHere is the property syntax :\n\nPrivate msLastOp as String * 1\n\nPublic Property Get LastOp() As String\n    LastOp = msLastOp\nEnd Property\n\nPublic Property Let LastOp(ByVal sNewValue As String)\n    msLastOp = sNewValue\nEnd Property\n\nI dunno, something like that. Just another route.
235716
Ofcourse. Just the way I do it is more like creating a windows customization program in C++ using the windows API and system API functions that you probably wont understand..... sry lol I can't help you much more on that..\n\n -Void
853215
Use DirectX!!! the only way to go! \nThere are a lot of examples on msdn\nhttp://www.vbcode.com/\nhttp://www.a1vbcode.com/\nand other sites like that
47455
So can u intergrate them without creating a new function
459468
Do you mean the framework, or the common runtime language?
492062
It can't be done directly, but porting it via RealBasic is an option (and at that point, you could build your app out to Mac, Windows or Linux).\n\nhttp://www.realbasic.com/support/whitepapers/portingvisualbasic/