why, when someone is dismissed, are they given the sack?
447059
Because when you were fired in the ancient days you were given a sack of your wages due...hence you've been sacked.
992367
do you mean dispossessed? then somebody filed and won a lawsuit against you.  disposed probably means a sheriffs auction
733679
Oh dear.  If someone was fired from their job as they couldn't do something, but the employer denied access to the organisation that could have enabled the employee to do that job, that employer stands to lose a lot of money in court.\n\nGet thee to an employment tribunel immediately!
238998
It sounds like a "No Contact Order." Which can be issued against a convicted abuser. The Prosecution would need to fear for your safety.\n\nIf this isn't the case. . .
629996
If somthing (a legal case) is dismissed without predjudice it means that the case has been dismissed, but can be refilled at anytime. If it is without prejudice, that means that, they are promising not to sue on the same debt or matter again. It's kinda backwards then what you would think.
1138189
It really depends on the situation. If you were laid off due to downsizing and then your boss gets fired as well later, then I will feel sympathy for him. If there was no downsizing and he just fired you for no good reason and then he gets fired as well, then all I have to say is "HA HA".
731400
IT is a sackable offense only if they can prove that you have done it repeatedly and more importantly they have given you two  formal warnings about it in the past, and you have never improved...\n\nIf they have, you could be screwed, as it is a Health and Safety regulation...
1028439
In general, the first dismissal is without prejudice and the Plaintiff may bring a new action for exactly the same thing a second time.\n\nThe Professional, above, is startlingly wrong.  Even his translation of Latin is wrong.  Res Judicata and Double Jeaopardy are two different concepts.
107834
when the minister dismisses you
5504
Depends on the state you're in and the employer. In my opinion, the employment contract is initially breached by the employee no longer performing as expected/demanded. The employer has well within his rights to terminate that employee.
869822
He was sacked for being a bit poo, and too nervous for TV....you gotta be au naturale.\n\nmrben
189405
The person should contact an attorney or legal aid.  I don't quite understand the question, but if a person was terminated from a job for a reason they feel isn't fair, then they do have rights.
255593
This is commonly used when someone has been on probation and they have been violated.  The judge may decide to revoke probation and "impose the sentence".  \n\nIn otherwords, they were given a chance, blew it, and now they are resposible for the original sentence.
832706
They are set free, and if they're lucky, they may get an apology from a court.\nThis has happened before, so its not hypothetical. It's fact. The law.
974142
Not only grounds for dismissal but it's also a felony, and in some cases is a crime, obstruction of justice, and all parties involved should be prosecuted accordingly to the full extent of the law..☺
1118443
There are lawyers that specialise in this subject. This has happened before and players have won such law suits.\n\nAsk around for a specialised lawyer
346239
I am not sure if that is really the case, but I would think someone could come back later if they got a bad score and said it was because of the distraction of the throw-up or something. Just covering their behinds if in fact they do collect them.