Can a batsman get out stumped off a no-ball? Can he be run-out off a no ball?
452205
AFTER GANGULY THROWN OUT..\nYOU BENGALIS ARE LITTLE CONFUSED I THINK.\nNO-BALL..CANT BE STUMPED.
48792
you can only do 'mankad' to a batsman bfor landing ur backfoot in the popping crease, earlier u can complete ur bowling action ,and stil can do a batsman 'mankad'. no warning is required to do mankad to batsman, courteney walsh once warned shane warne not be out of the crease in a tight macth situation, bcoz of aus has won that match. if walsh would had done 'mankad'shane windies might had won that match.
141084
Previously, in ODI's, there were no fielding restrictions. The fielding captain could keep his players anywhere he wanted. Then, around the World Cup in 1996, ICC introduced the 15 over field restriction rule. Only 2 fielders were allowed outside the 30 yard circle from the batsmen for the first 15 overs on an innings. And from the 16th over, 5 fielders were allowed to move out. One more important aspect of that rule was that two fielders had to be in catching positions - 15 yards from the batsmen, till the field restrictions applied.
429529
Wow, so many answers and none of them correct, no one has answered how to win a match by zero wickets.  \n\nIn the example given a couple previous answers are correct, the run would count, the wicket would not count, the batting team would win by 1 wicket.  Lords holds the laws of cricket.  \n\nLaw 24 (no balls) states:\n12. Penalty for a No ball\n"A penalty of one run shall be awarded instantly on the call of No ball. Unless the call is revoked, this penalty shall stand even if a batsman is dismissed. It shall be in addition to any other runs scored, any boundary allowance and any other penalties awarded."\n\nAnd under law 25 (wide ball)\n"5. Penalty for a Wide\nA penalty of one run shall be awarded instantly on the call of Wide ball. Unless the call is revoked (see 3 above), this penalty shall stand even if a batsman is dismissed, and shall be in addition to any other runs scored, any boundary allowance and any other penalties awarded."\n\nNow as to whether the wicket would count.  Law 21 (The Result) states:\n"6. Winning hit or extras\n(a) As soon as a result is reached, as defined in 1, 2, 3 or 4 above, the match is at an end. Nothing that happens thereafter, except as in Law 42.17(b) (Penalty runs), shall be regarded as part of it. Note also 9 below."\n\nTherefore the wide or no-ball would count but the wicket would not as it came after the result.  Similarly if a batsman is on 98 and the scores are tied they need a boundary to get to 100, they cannot run 2 as the result is reached after the first run.\n\nThe only way a team can win with zero wickets is also covered by law 21:\n"7. Statement of result\nIf the side batting last wins the match without losing all its wickets, the result shall be stated as a win by the number of wickets still then to fall.\nIf the side batting last has lost all its wickets but, as the result of an award of 5 penalty runs at the end of the match, has scored a total of runs in excess of the total scored by the opposing side, the result shall be stated as a win to that side by Penalty runs."\n\nPenalty runs are awarded due to unfair play.  There are only three instances where a fielding side can give away 5 penalty runs during an over: 1)  deliberate distraction or obstruction of the batsman second infringement.  However the wicket will not count so they will in fact win by 1 wicket.  2)  Fielder does damage to the pitch.  Afridi was guilty of this recently.  3)  Match ball condition is changed, plenty of instances of this happening.  \n\nAt the end of a match if a team has lost by less then 5 runs and they find TV footage of the fielding team damaging the pitch or changing the condition of the ball they could apply for a 5 run penalty to win the match.  This would have to be done before the umpires meet with the scorers at the conclusion of the match.  Once the umpires and scorers agree on the correctness of the scores the result cannot be changed.
645323
Yes it is possible.  The first batsmen hits the ball and they run either 1 or 3.  The fielder throws an overthrow (where the fields accidently miss the ball) so further runs or potentially a four are additionally scored.  \n\nSay in this instance, the batters run 1 and there is an overthrow of 4.  That gives the first batsmen his century and puts the other batsmen on strike with 1 run remaining.  The second batsmen hits a 4 or a 6 to win the game and also get his century.
523226
NO. HE IS NOT OUT IF HAPPEN AS YOU DESCRIBE.\n\nLEG STUMP LINE IS LEAST FACTOR TO CONSIDER THE L.B.W.\n\nOUTSIDE LEG STUMP? NO WAY.
706527
while facing a delivery if the ball happen to pitch in line with any three stumps and hit the batsman's pad without touching the bat again in line with the stumpsthen he is considered OUT\nin case of a spinner if the ball doesnt pitch in line of the stumps but appears to be hitting the stumps then still the batsman is given OUT\nif the batsman doesnt appear to be hitting a shot and if the ball doesnt pitch in line of the stumps and appears to be hitting the stumps then without any doubt he is given OUT
985110
The penalty is 5 runs. It happened to Australia when playing against South Africa. It's so rare that it can be hardly seen.
1014075
SEE DON, \nEVERY BOWLER CHUCKING IN SOME OCCASIONS.\nESP. WHILE THEY ARE FRUSTRATING WITH THE PITCH AND BATSMAN.\nBUT, \nMURALI IS AFFECTED IN THIS ISSUE, FOR HIGH LIGHT ANOTHER BOWLER.\nDO I NEED TO SAY HIS NAME?
131907
The following are the ways a batsman can be given out.\n1. Bowled\n2. Caught\n3. Caught & Bowled (Caught by Bowler)\n4. Stumped\n5. L.B.W.(Leg Before Wicket)\n6. Run Out\n7. Hit Wicket\n8. Handling the Ball\n9. Obstructing the field\n10. Time out (This happens if a batsman fails to come to crease within a fixed time, i do not know the exact time)
966467
One solution is here:\n\nBatsman 1 hits the ball and runs 3, and fielder throws the ball which goes to the boundary as overthrows. In between, the umpire calls ONE (RUN) SHORT. So Total Runs = 3 (ran by batsmen) - 1 (One Short) + 4 (Overthrows).\n\nSo, Batsman 1 gets 6 runs and completes his Century. Also, as the batsmen ran 3 runs, the other batsman (Batsman2) will be on strike for the next ball. He hits a SIX and completes his Century, there by winning the match.\n\nI'll have a look if there are other solutions.\n\nUpdate: More solutions: \n1st Ball: 1 run scored + 5 penalty runs (Ball tampering, ball hitting helmet, fieldingwith cap, fielder obstructing batsman, time-wasting by fielders, tampering of pitch)\n2nd Ball: 6 runs.
1185887
NONE.\n\nALL BATSMEN SCORED ATLEAST A "ZERO" IN ANY LEVEL OF THE GAME.\n\nNOBODY CAN AVOID THAT.
523492
Duck!\n\nGolden Duck if the batsman is out first ball.
755634
Yes there are rules like you can't kick the ball and have it go out of the playing area on the full, if a ball crosses the line and the umpire deems it was done on pourpose you give away a free, No tackle below the waist or above the shoulders, to pay a mark the bal has to travel at least 15m, when a person marks the ball unneccesary contact on them gives them 50m penalty (take the kick 50m further up the field, if inside your forward 50 the kick from the top of the goal square) you can also only run 15m before the ball must make contact the ground (ussually bounced)\n\nThat is all I can be bothered saying ther are any hundreds of rules and regulations. look for umpiring sites to find the rest
487800
Yes. It's possible in more than one ways!\nMy answer is this:\nThe second last ball: Batsman-1 hits hard and they run 3 runs. When the third run was being taken an enthusiastic fielder throws the ball to one end, misses the stumps and the ball crosses the boundry for 4, resulting in total 7 runs. The team has won the match! BUT WAIT... The umpire is signalling one short-run (incomplete run), because during the process of running 3, one of the batsmen didn't once plant his bat properly inside the crease. So, effectively, they have scored just 6. Thus, although batsman-1 has completed his century, but the team still needs 1 run to win. However, because of all this, now batsman-2 in on strike (as they had ran 3). \nThe last ball: Instead of scoring that single, batsman-2 hits a six, to complete his 100. \nFinally, the team has won, and both have scored 100's. \n\nThere could be another possibilities also, but while deciding the best answer, please think practically and consider the tense situation also.\n\nThis same question was asked TWICE before by some \nÂ¦Â¥Â¦Â¤Â°ÂºÃ?Ã?Ã?Ã?ÂºÂ°... about 5 days ago. My answer was the same as I have written here (and some users have actually copied my answer here, without giving any citation!). \nBut, there that asker selected the following answers:\n1. By ThE FLamEe\nBatsman A faces the second last delivery. He hits the ball for a six, which is saved by the fielder in the deep. The fielder is just to lazy to stop the ball by his hand, and stops by his hat. Batsman A has already ran a run, and is on the opposite side. The batsman gets 6 runs, 1 he ran, 5 for penalty! Batsman A completes century. Now Batsman B hits a six on the last ball, thereby making his century and winning the match.\n2. By t_rex_boi\nEasy....the batsman 1 hits the first of the 2 balls and runs a single......the throw to run out at the keepers end misses the stump and hits the cap/helmet ( not worn) of one of the fielders/wicketkeeper. thats 5 runs so total scored on the ball is 6(1+5) and the strike changed as they took a single. the last ball is hit for a six when 1 run was needed.\n\nNow, my question is:\nDo you think in a tense situation like this a fielder would stop the ball with his hat? So, in my opinion, the answer 1 (By ThE FLamEe) is just a possibility, nothing more. The answer 2 (By t_rex_boi) is quite acceptable.\n\nSo, before deciding anything, think practically (although this example is a rarest of the rarest situation indeed). In a tense situation you can expect short-runs, over-throws... etc. Not that a fielder stopping the ball with his hat!!!
373048
Yes he should be out. Let me tell you, it's not about 6-7 matches. He has scored just 3 fifties in last 35 innings. I can't imagine any player resting on past laurels for that long. Even Ganguly's recent record is better than him. The selectors need to be consistent. Sehwag is by far the most overrated cricketer ever.
731148
I'm not sure what your question is asking.  But you can't move any ball during the course of any game unless there is a scratch in which case you can have "ball on hand" with the white ball.