do you think september 11 is lie of the history.?
439203
According to Republic Broadcasting Network radio, 911 was an inside government job to enable Bush to start his war on terror and take more of our freedom away.  It was another step towards a one world government.
1049378
The Destruction of the World Trade Center:\nWhy the Official Account Cannot Be True\nDavid Ray Griffin\nAuthorized Version (with references & notes)\n\n \n\n \n\nIn The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (2004), I summarized dozens of facts and reports that cast doubt on the official story about 9/11. Then in The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005a), I discussed the way these various facts and reports were treated by the 9/11 Commission, namely, by distorting or simply omitting them. I have also taken this big-picture approach, with its cumulative argument, in my previous essays and lectures on 9/11 (Griffin, 2005b and 2005d).[1] This approach, which shows every aspect of the official story to be problematic, provides the most effective challenge to the official story.\n\n     But this way of presenting the evidence has one great limitation, especially when used in lectures and essays: It means that the treatment of every particular issue must be quite brief, hence superficial. People can thereby be led to suspect that a more thorough treatment of any particular issue might show the official story to be plausible after all.\n\n     In the present essay, I focus on one question: why the Twin Towers and building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. One advantage of this focus, besides the fact that it allows us to go into considerable detail, is that the destruction of the World Trade Center provides one of the best windows into the truth about 9/11. Another advantage of this focus is that it will allow us to look at revelations contained in the 9/11 oral histories, which were recorded by the New York Fire Department shortly after 9/11 but released to the public only in August of 2005.\n\nI will begin with the question of why the Twin Towers collapsed, then raise the same question about building 7.\n\n \n\n \n\n1. The Collapse of the Twin Towers\n\n \n\nShortly after 9/11, President Bush advised people not to tolerate “outrageous conspiracy theories about the attacks of 11 September” (Bush, 2001).[2] Philip Zelikow, who directed the work of the 9/11 Commission, has likewise warned against “outrageous conspiracy theories” (Hansen, 2005). What do these men mean by this expression? They cannot mean that we should reject all conspiracy theories about 9/11, because the government’s own account is a conspiracy theory, with the conspirators all being members of al-Qaeda. They mean only that we should reject outrageous theories.\n\nBut what distinguishes an outrageous theory from a non-outrageous one? This is one of the central questions in the philosophy of science. When confronted by rival theories---let’s say Neo-Darwinian Evolution and Intelligent Design---scientists and philosophers of science ask which theory is better and why. The mark of a good theory is that it can explain, in a coherent way, all or at least most of the relevant facts and is not contradicted by any of them. A bad theory is one that is contradicted by some of the relevant facts. An outrageous theory would be one that is contradicted by virtually all the relevant facts.\n\n     With this definition in mind, let us look at the official theory about the Twin Towers, which says that they collapsed because of the combined effect of the impact of the airplanes and the resulting fires. The report put out by FEMA said: “The structural damage sustained by each tower from the impact, combined with the ensuing fires, resulted in the total collapse of each building” (FEMA, 2002).[3] This theory clearly belongs in the category of outrageous theories, because is it is contradicted by virtually all the relevant facts. Although this statement may seem extreme, I will explain why it is not.\n\n \n\nNo Prior Collapse Induced by Fire\n\nThe official theory is rendered implausible by two major problems. The first is the simple fact that fire has never---prior to or after 9/11---caused steel-frame high
1006681
Honey, I hate to tell you, but this "evidence" that 9/11 was an "inside job" was already disproven.  Don't you think that the news media would love to release it if it was so?  After all, they already had to admit that there was no actual "wire-tapping" and that the "leak" was actually the disclosure of declassified information.  It's like every time an allegation comes up, it's disproved, so they have to come up with something else.  They'd love to jump on the conspiracy theory bandwagon.  911truth.org is LIES.  So is Loose Change.  So is letsroll911.org.  The .org at the end of their names means nothing.\nMy proof?  A 100 year old magazine, with no political affiliation.  Go to www.popularmechanics.com, and search for the story about debunking the 9/11 myths.  They have actual testimony from witnesses, firemen, police officers, and scientists who studied exactly how and why those buildings came down.  \nPlease, please, please research this more thoroughly.  I've seen all those sites, I've seen the "evidence", I've watched their "documentaries".  I found them to be about as true as Fahrenheit 9/11, which Michael Moore himself admitted was mostly lies.  The rest was a distorted brand of truth and misquotes, and things taken out of context.
1026742
Because most americans are too lazy/busy to do the minimal amount of research needed to open their eyes to the numerous lies about 9/11. Just recently scientist examined a preserved portion of a WTC support column and found thermite on the neatly cut metal support beam. Thermite is a cutting agent used in controlled demolitions.\nNumerous accredited people from German Defense Ministers to CIA agents who gave daily briefings to Reagan and Bush Sr. have come forward saying 9/11 is a big lie, but the main stream controlled media won't tell America this thus most Americans assume its not true. \n\nBasically we have a nation of brainwashed couch slugs to lazy to think for themselves. And if the TV news won't tell them the truth, then the truth of 9/11 is just a kookie tin foil hat pipe dream.\n\nI am so glad I no longer am one of those pathetic sheeple.
1022372
I think about this all the time. It seems a lot of people on here and in general don't seem to know anything about history, or even what happened as short as 10 years ago. People seem to get all their information from the news and not any non biased historical sources.
352459
It might be withholding some information on the grounds of national security of for legal reasons but in the main the events of that day are so well documented that it would be difficult to withold any of the salient facts.\n\nThere are conspiracy theories that 9/11 was orchestrated by the FBI and other US agencies but as with all conspiracy theories, they don't stand up to even the most basic of examinations and are based on ignorance not fact.
186187
That is definitely true! One of the many cover-ups of 9/11!\n\nBefore the dust had settled from the collapse of the World Trade Towers, Israel's foreign ministry had expressed concern for the well being of 4000 Israelis known to have worked in or near the World Trade Towers. But almost immediately, stories of such concern vanished from the media amid reports in the foreign press which claimed that Israelis who worked in or near the World Trade Towers were specifically given advanced warnings not to go to work on 9/11. One Israeli owned company, Odigo, had received a two hour advance warning of the attacks. \n\nIsraeli supporters were soon flooding the US media with denials of the story.Even when the US media's spiking of the Israeli spy ring/phone tap story proved a clear pro-Israel propaganda bias, the claim that Israelis working in the area of the WTC were preferentially absent on 9/11 was still dismissed as an internet legend. \n\nNow, however, as the final tally of 9/11 victims is being generated, CNN's own website, which lists 9/11 victims by nationality, shows that only one Israeli, Alona Avraham, died in the 9/11 attacks and that Mr. Avraham was not in or near the WTC, but a passenger on one of the hijacked aircraft. \n\nBecause of Odigo, it is beyond question warnings were sent to Israeli owned or linked companies in the area of the WTC. Because of the almost complete absence of Israelis among the victims, it is now apparent how widespread that warning had to have been. \nFor furthur verfification,visit this website :\nhttp://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/memorial/lists/by-country/page9.html\n\nWhat do you call that?! coincidence?!\nI don't think so!\nYou do the math and think logically!
879278
Wow! I wasn't aware that everyone knew about the terrorist attack prior to it happening.\n\nDemocrats & the Liberals would have you believe that it was only the government that knew.\n\nCan you guys get your stories straight please. Its no wonder you are all so messed up with your thinking, you can't even coordinate consistancy with your lies.
347297
I watch it and I was shock to see many of the findings. Especially that they have way to mimic peoples voices and just lie and place the blame where it doesn't belong. This day I am sad to for both the victims of WTC and the citizens of both Iraq and Afghanistan and we all need to wake up our freedom is at stake here. Please be careful Andaria. People are gonna try to make all sorts of excuses but the fact remains where is the proof??
799117
Please calrify your question.\nAre you trying to JUSTIFY 9/11??????
388006
Yes  I Know The Facts\nLarry Silverstein Purchased The WTC Within A Year Of The Attacks And 6 Months B4 The Attacks(9/11), He Insured The WTC Complex For A RECORD 7 BILLION $$(With A Clause In The Policy SPECIFICALLY Covering A TERRORIST ATTACK)\n\nWell.. Mr. Silverstein Recently Purchased The Sears Tower And A Short Time Ago, Insured It For ANOTHER RECORD(UnDisclosed)Amount....\n\nThe SECURITY For WTC Was Provided By (Get This) MARVIN BUSH\nA Brother To George W And Jeb(Which May Explain How The FOLLOWING May Have Occurred)\n\nIt Is Being Investigated That The Buildings Were RIGGED For CONTROLLED FALL( Which Would Have Taken MONTHS)\nIncluding Building #7 (Which Was NOT HIT BY A PLANE And Had Minimal Fire Damage)\nIt Has Been Stated By Structural Engineers(Independant Of The Hokey Investigation By The Bush Crime Family)That It WAS NOT POSSIBLE That WTC 1 and 2 COLLAPSED From The Impact Of The Planes That Hit Them\nThe REASON BLDG 7 Was Destroyed Was To Conceal The EVIDENCE That The Buildings Were Dropped From A Control Bunker In The Basement(Where The Technicians "Ignited The Fuses" So To Speak)\nIt Is VERY Difficult To PROVE As The EVIDENCE Of These Crimes ( THE DEBRIS FROM THE COLLAPSES)Were HURRIED AWAY TO CHINA For RECYCLING After The Disaster\nThe So Called TERRORISTS That Were SUPPOSEDLY Flying Those Planes (Mohammed Atta And His 19 Friends) Well..16 Of The 19 Are In Fact Proven ALIVE With The Other 3 UnAccounted For ,But Presumed ALIVE\nIt Has Been Speculated That The 2 Planes Tht Hit The Towers Were Remotely Operated By The Military With NOONE Aboard\nFlight 93 (The One That "CRASHED" In PA) Is In Fact STILL In Service\nAnd At This Time , There Is NO EVIDENCE That A Plane Crashed Into The Pentagon, Although Something(A US Tomahawk Missile???) Did Fly Into And Destroy A Portion Of It\n\nWhat Ive Told You Is In EVIDENCE In A Theory Behind The Trade Center Attack Being An INSIDE JOB ORCHESTRATED By The BUSH Crime Family , And BLAMED On TERRORISTS So That Bush Could ILLEGALLY Go To War(Without The Approval Of Congress)\n\nFor MORE On This See: Alex Jones At Ground Zero\n\nhttp://martiallaw911.info/video.htm...\n\nSee Also: Loose Change 2nd Edition (Google It)\n\nIMPEACH BUSH NOW\n\nhttp://www.world-action.co.uk/explosives.html\n\nhttp://www.commondreams.org/views03/0204-06.htm\n\nhttp://www.realestatejournal.com/propertyreport/newsandtrends/20040312-starkman.html\n\nhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/200306charliesheen.htm\n\nhttp://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/collapse%20update/index.htm\n\nhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2005/070805alternativemedia.htm\n\nhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm\n\nhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/160605governmentcomplicit.htm\n\nhttp://martiallaw911.info/video.htm
1112224
There is NO DOUBT in my mind that the US government was behind it! Who benefited MOST from it. Bush got his war, the "Military Industrial Complex" is making hundreds of BILLIONS, Osama got away with it and is a martar to his followers. \n\nSome people will never believe no matter what the facts show. The same kinds of tactics have been used for hundreds of years. The German people didn't believe it in the 1930s & 40s either, and many still don't. But it happened.\n\nCalling people "conspiracy nuts" for entertaining the idea of OUR government being corrupt, doesn't change the fact that it ALWAYS has been. Some folks just refuse to consider such things. \n\nDoubters explain this: \n\nHow is it that burning jet fuel does NOT burn hot enough to melt steel, yet that is the "Official" explaination for the collapses of all 3 WTC buildings?\n\nWhy did the towers fall STRAIGHT DOWN? Physics would dictate that if the top was too heavy for the damaged area, it would have fallen to one side. \n\nWhy were police and firemen quoted as saying they witnessed multiple explosions in several locations (including in the basement) many far from the impact area. One so large it was measured on a reichter scale nearly 100 miles away.\n\nWhy did WTC building 7 go down? It was not hit and sustained very little damage from a fire in a small area of one floor.\n\nWhy did the owner of the buildings tell the FDNY to "pull" the building? It takes weeks to prep a building for demolition, yet they had it wired with explosives and leveled by 8 pm on september 11th.\n\nThese are the ONLY modern high rise building IN HISTORY to be brought down by fire!\n\nSo before discounting it offhand, at least try to answer the questions being raised.
839013
Anyone who risks their life to help others is a hero.  Anyone who does that and then turns down riches (possibly risking their life again) to stand up for what they believe is a special and unusual individual - we need more of them in the world.\n\nCareful, Frank J.  Surely the best way to honour the dead is to find the truth and bring the guilty to justice.  The truth can always withstand questions.  Who are you believing and why?  I've got copies of news footage broadcast on September 11, by networks desperate to fill airtime, but never repeated.  These include:\n1) NYFD personnel in their station house, fresh out of the WTC, clearly saying "it was like there was bombs going off.. like as if they planned to bring down a building.. there was floors poppin' out.."\n2) A Fox News journalist phoning in saying that he saw the second plane fly overhead and that it was "..clearly not a passenger plane.. I didn't see any windows.  There was no logo on the tail.. there was a blue circular logo.."\n3) Larry Silverstein (owner, since June 2001, of the WTC compound) saying of building seven "we decided to pull it".\n4) The section of Pentagon collapsing while people walk close by as though nothing is happening.  Most people don't realise that some of the networks got cameras there in time to see the collapse (even though uniformed secret service were closing down approach roads), proving a) it didn't happen when it was hit, b) whatever hit the Pentagon did not have a 125ft wingspan or a 45ft tail like a 757 (there were no corresponding marks around the initial 14-16ft hole, and even after the section collapsed it was still only about 75ft wide with no evidence of an impact from a large passenger aircraft such as fuselage, engines, wings, tail, seats or luggage).\n\nThen there's the 75 page report presented to a symposium @ Idaho State University by physics Professor Stephen Jones detailing how tests on samples from the collapsed WTC towers prove the involvement of thermite.\n\nThis is not theorising.  The evidence is all over the place.  Think about who stood to gain most from the events of September 11 and who's come up with the official story - it's the same people.
1027224
It's not that it's convincing by itself. It's just that it ties in with what we heard on 9/11 in terms of news (much of which may have been unconfirmed). People make that connection between what they remember seeing in the news that day and what the government is telling us now and assume that because two sources are confirming the story, it must be true.
799563
Another conspiracy nut, Get a life, the 9/11 attacks were conducted by terrorists, but why do i tell you idiots this every time.  I should just ignore you, yet im still typing.
930397
You know, I wonder how many people actually pay attention to history.  It's been this way since the beginning of time.  Humans are just horrible.  Nobody made the Muslims the threat, they made themselves the threat.  Sorry, but we didn't just make a movie about 9/11.  It really happened.  People really died.  Do you watch the news?  Very few countries in the world aren't fighting some kind of war.  We don't have to make up any kind of controversy.
300531
Yes, the world trade center was brought down by explosives.\nThis was visible to anybody with a serious knowledge of demolitions from the images taken by the victims at ground level. The building fell too easilly, too smoothly, didn't\ntumble, didn't veer to one side. You can see the explosives taking out every few floors in slow motion.\n\nIn all probability the world trade center was demolished by the bush administration.\n\nAs an aside, the idea that the fuel of those planes could have caused the collapse is total nonsensical fiction. The physics say theres not enough energy. And one of the planes\nblew up 95 percent of its fuel against the side of the building. Also interesting are the buildings demolished by explosives hundreds of feet away from the towers.\n\nThere is an entire movement on the internet called the 911\ntruth movement that has been bringing attention to this for years. Eventually history will show that 911 was the Bush administrations "riestagg fire". The excuse they needed to justify the wars they wanted to have.