why do   we   care aboout who killed kennedy?
438886
You may wish to learn who President John F. Kennedy was before deciding to be so smug about the question of "Why do we care?"\n\nShort Answer, we care because the three most egregious breakdowns in security on U.S. Soil (in order they happened), Pearl Harbor, The assasination of President Kennedy and September 11th.
1001373
According to the Warren Commission, Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated John F. Kennedy.  Unless there is proof someone else committed the crime, Oswald is the most likely suspect to have assassinated Kennedy.
831918
We may never know but I received these unsoliticited links today in my email, interestingly, the day after I saw the movie "Bobby" \n\n http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/112306A.shtml\n\nhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2006/11/who_shot_bobby_kennedy_1.html
722932
It doesn't matter! He's a Kennedy. He could get away with murder if he tried.
6228
Lee Harvey Oswald has been accused for assination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Instead of me writing about the conspiracy theory revolving around his assination, here a link to a well documented article, written by Carl Oglesby :\nhttp://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/Who_Killed_JFK.html\n\nHope your query has been solved
247172
The mother of all coverups: i think the Cubans were behind JFK's assassination.  Castro was getting back at JFK for his involvement in trying to get the American Mafia to assassinate him. The Russian connectin, helped give the Cubans the patsy they needed (in the form of Oswald) to carry out the job. A week before the assassination, Oswald met with a Cuban agent in Mexico City.  The FBI was following up on this lead during the Warren Commission investigation, but the FBI agents were recalled on orders from their HQ office in DC.  Ruby had all sorts of connections with the Mafia, including Marcello of New Orleans and Giancana from Chicago.  But why did the US Govt keep the Russian, Cuban and Mafia connection out of the limelight, what is the truth???
649855
The Kennedys consider themselves royalty, and above the rest of the country. Everytime one of them gets into trouble, they just blame it on someone or something else. They wouldn't even know how to accept responsibility for their own actions. We should stop electing them and show them they are just like the rest of us.
121734
The assassination of President John F Kennedy.
45163
Actually nobody knows who did it.\n\nThe Conspiracy...\n\nThe Conspiracy\n\nDealey Plaza\n\nWhat about those witnesses? Didn't everyone hear shots from the Grassy Knoll? What about the Tague wounding? Who was the "Umbrella Man?" Was the rifle recovered really a Mauser? Does "acoustic evidence" show a shot from the Grassy Knoll? Were the Three Tramps suspicious? How could Kennedy's head go "back and to the left?" \n\nThe Single Bullet Theory\n\nYou've seen Kevin Costner give the conspiracy version of the Single Bullet theory. You know: Connally seated directly in front of Kennedy, at the same height, and facing straight ahead. Was that really what happened? \n\nLee Harvey Oswald\n\nWhat sort of person was he? Did he really have "Top Secret" security clearance? Did he shoot at General Walker? Were there two Oswalds? If Oswald shot Kennedy, what was his motive? Was the man exhumed in 1981 really somebody besides Oswald? \n\nJim Garrison and New Orleans\n\nDid Oswald really share an office with Guy Banister? Did Clay Shaw really use the alias "Clay Bertrand?" Why did Oliver Stone make a movie about the Shaw trial and not even mention Perry Raymond Russo? Did David Ferrie die a "mysterious death?" What about Jim Garrison and the Mafia? \n\nMedical Evidence\n\nDid the bullet that hit Kennedy in the back penetrate only an inch and fall out? Was Kennedy hit in the head by a bullet from in front? Are the autopsy photos and x-rays faked? Did all the doctors at Parkland Hospital believe that Kennedy was hit in the front of the neck, and if so, are their opinions decisive evidence that that is what happened? Was the back of Kennedy's head blown out? Are the autopsy photos faked? \n\nBogus Evidence\n\nDid you know that all the evidence in this case proven to be forged has been on the conspiracy side? One key piece originated with the KGB! Did you know that the "mysterious deaths" are virtually all not so "mysterious" when you look at them closely? Do you trust authors like Mark Lane to tell you the truth about what witnesses said? \n\nJack Ruby\n\nThe "lone nut" theory of the assassination is really the "two lone nuts" theory. What sort of person was Jack Ruby? A mobster? An intelligence agent? A small-time hustler? The sort of volatile character who might really have shot Oswald out of righteous anger? \n\nOliver Stone's Movie "JFK"\n\nWe expect Hollywood movies to take some liberties with the historical record. But what do we think when Hollywood turns history on its head? Oliver Stone wants to overturn the verdict in the Clay Shaw trial. The jury found that District Attorney Jim Garrison had no case — so Stone invents a case on celluloid. Just how honest was Oliver Stone, Shaw's Hollywood prosecutor? \n\nJohn Kennedy: Liberal Martyr?\n\nFor some in the conspiracy crowd, John Kennedy was a liberal saint, who was going to implement policies that would bring America into a new Utopia. So, of course, a threatened Power Elite had to kill him. Was Kennedy the kind of left liberal who threatened established interests? Was he a hero of Civil Rights? Had he decided to pull out of Vietnam? Historian Eric Paddon dissects these claims in a series of essays based on his posts on the Internet. \n\nAssassination Logic\n\nSome notions about logic, probability and statistics necessarily underlie all discussion of "conspiracy" or "lone assassin." Does the lone assassination theory involve too many implausible "coincidences?" Are there a suspicious number of "connections" between various figures in the case? Is the Single Bullet Theory highly "improbable?" \nAssassination Witnesses\nIt writings about the assassination, as in real-world criminal justice, witness testimony looms large. But just how reliable are the witnesses? How many witnesses are just flat out telling tall
751264
Kennedy's personal lives are just that personal. Bush has made this war all of our business, whether we chose it to be or not. I'd say Kennedy.
98526
I doubt that anyone knows how many people were involved in JFK's murder.  I am sure Oswald was NOT the only one involved.  From what I have read, he didn't even qualify on the rifle range when he was in the USMC, and that was with a semi-automatic rifle.  The Carcano he is accused of using would not be the weapon of choice for such a job.  That particular model tended to jam and you would want a more tried and true weapon for such a task, such as a Mauser 98.
400529
I believe Oswald acted alone.\n\nIn 1962, Kennedy tried to secretly sent out assassins to kill Castro. Some believe word slipped to one of Castro's men. Maybe the tables turned.\nBut, I believe Oswald acted alone, but out of hatred that Kennedy tried to kill Castro. Oswald looked up to Castro and his beliefs for Communism. When Oswald was in the service, he had pretty good shot with a gun.\n\nThat morning on November 22nd, Oswald was driving a friend to work. His friend looked in his backseat and asked what the long thing was lying there, covered by a green sheet. \n"Some rods." He responded. There was no other talking after that.\nThat comment always made me wonder...\n~Nikki
609438
Like father like son.  Fortunately, Ted Kennedy's son got stopped before he killed somebody.  Too bad the same can't be said for his father.  To answer your question, they will keep getting DUI's, maybe kill another girl, and keep getting reelected by democrats.
989647
why the hell do you care?
640611
we Brits all believe that she was murdered - on purpose - with heavy cover-up\n\nrather like the America's JFK\n\nreasons unknown but she did blow the whistle on how the royal family operated and then she was dating a Muslim chappie too - both no nos in the aristocracy
333067
Yes, it's true it was reported there first.\n\nThe real killers (plural) were the right wing conservatives at that time. Kennedy was making this country too liberal for them, he didn't like the war and was trying to stop it, they liked it, it meant big money for the defense industry.\n\nHe also cared more about people than big business. so they murdered him and blamed it on some poor sap.\n\nJohnson, who replaced him as president and escalated the war was a political conservative. He and Senator Arlen Spector invented the "single bullet theory" to mislead the public into thinking it was just a lone assasin. People are so gullible.
676940
Oswald could not have been the only one that shot Kennedy. Police recovered a 1940's model Manlicher Carcano bolt action rifle from the sixth floor of the TSBD building. In theory, this was the rifle Oswald was purported to have used. In reality, the weapon was barely capable of accuracy at 5o yards, let alone having 3 accurate shots fired from it in less than six seconds. The head shot Kennedy received caused his head to move backwards and to his left. The whole back of his skull was blown out. Close study of the Zapruder film shows this in graphic detail. As for 9/11...........well, Hitler burned the Reichstag in order to implement his plan. Nothing is impossible for desperate leaders