Is there anything to contradict this theory?
445211
Non-existence can never be proven.  Until evidence is presented for a things existence it's simply irrational to believe in it.
557287
If a theory can be proven, then it becomes a proven fact.  I suspect you'll find a lot of denial, even if someone could prove theories like this.
1156908
yes.  don't know why. there is no logical explanation.  theories abound. but all can be discounted.  its just how it is. it will not change. adjust perhaps. but not change. sigh.
605414
According to one theory there are particles, which are exchanged and travel between the objects, giving impression that objects attract or repel each other. Nothing is proved yet and it is just a theory, as far as my knowledge is concerned.
999383
Yes. Absolutely. Everything in the Bible is absolutely and inescapably the Reality of the Universe. If something contradicts what is written in the Bible, it must be false, because the Bible is infallible. If something in the Bible contradicts something else in the Bible, you must have misunderstood it, because the Bible is infallible.
649175
are you trying to suggest that time travel in the reverse direction,ie, travelling to the past, is possible..\n\nif thats the case then anything can have an opposite of it, like mass etc. which are conventionally taken to be positive
551099
I'm not sure I understand your question.  I certainly think that the meaning of counterfactuals can be unraveled in a systematic way.
79989
Still more theory than fact.\nIt is responsible for the force of gravity.
198845
Um ... yes?\n\nHow the heck can we figure this out without links to the relevant information?  Or is reading your mind part of the question requirements?
1183957
I think the question is Prove no-one can..., etc. This idea was proposed millenia ago by the Greek thinker Zeno, and is called "Zeno's paradox". The idea was that the runner reaches 1/2 way, then 3/4, 7/8, 15/16, etc. and must therefore never reach the end. It wasn't "proven" beyond the idea of being an interesting apparent paradox which is easily dispelled when one considers that, yes, the runner does reach all those points, but that fact needn't imply a limit on his motion. There is more complexity to the thinking than my summary indicates, however, and you may be interested to read the discussion in the reference.
203980
No, that is not true.\nTry these sights for more information.
1053858
So far, the laws of nature have been constant wherever we look. This includes astronomical observations of events long ago and far away. Therefore, the assumption that the laws do not change is a reasonable one and is generally accepted. If you want to argue otherwise, you need to specify what laws you think were different, in what way, and how could we tell. Otherwise, your argument is no better than "science doesn't know everything; therefore, pigs can fly".
111164
That is an assumption which cannot be proven. No one yet disproved it by showing 2 of the same.\n\nIf you consider the molecular scale, there's pretty much never 2 of the same of anything.  So I (as most people seem to) am referring to 2 of the exact same pattern.  There are infinitely many of possibilities, but there have been an awful lot of snowflakes to assume none have been the same.
987673
no it is not true\n\nis this a question?
354764
If you can prove I am wrong, then I would clearly have to reconsider my position on the matter!\n\nBut, that is impossible to do at the current moment in time - the best you can hope for is that advancements in human understanding allow you to be successful in the future (which, clearly, I very much doubt will occur)
918061
Yes,\nbecause you cannot have two things contradicting each other yet both of them are correct. for example, a>= b and a<b , they cannot be both correct.\n\nWhich one is correct then? well that's for you to find out.\n\nRegards
908460
Theoretically, no, not according to our current understanding.  In fact, that would violate causality, because an effect would then predate it's cause