Is U.S.A attack on Iran or not if not then define reason?
453817
Our military stretched out way to far, and nuclear war means no win situation. i do not believe UK and Russia would like it very much the USA bombing Iran with nuclear weapons. In all Israel will wind up bombing them.
982113
It's a threat. They're enriching themselves in uranium and soon will blow up Israel and ignite a world war.  I don't know why the UN is such a pussy on Iran or why Bush hasn't taken a strong action against Iran. If the Bush administration or Israel invades Iran they will have my full support. I don't hate Iranians or muslims but radical islamics are a threat to society. I hope you don't think I'm a bigot.
675970
I hope not.. it would be a big mistake if they attacked Iran
722818
I ask who support terrorists?Iran or USA.The country which help to Israel or the country that want peaceful in the world?USA government support news channels in west and they cant say in oppose of USA.So we cant say Iran wants to make bombs.The history say us that USA isn't reliable.
1078633
I'm unaware that Bush has ever attacked a country without a reason. The only countries America has ever fought with during the Bush administration were Iraq and Afhganistan, in which we had many reasons to be there. What are you talking about? Are you stoned?
90192
If US attack Iran, it will be the beginning of a collapse for all.  Neither Iran nor US will win the war. We all will face with the ugly consequences of a war and we all directly or indirectly will be affected. But for sure the war opportunists and beneficiaries will won something in $. \n\nWinning a war is not simply to take control of a land, have other components also. Bush and his crew should have some considerable amount of reasons($) to push their country and the world to a very dangerous edge. They do not concentrate internal problems but prefer to play the guard of the world with poor justifications.
193918
It has begun and will eventually expand and yes America is the reason. \n\nNot the ordinary people, but the acts of those treasonous fucks in power with their 200G salaries and we don't give a fuck attitudes.\n\nI believe an attack on Iran will be the catalyst for the expansion of conflict.
483958
To build a reason for attacking Iraq
133364
Please clarify.  I really don't think you mean Iran is going to invade Iran.
400358
The only thing worst then a military attack on Iran by the United States right now is a nuclear armed Iran. It can not be allowed too happen. I'm reminded of one of my favorite quotes: \n\n"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."\n-John Stuart Mills, 19th Century Philosopher and Economist
381913
no. sorry. everyone is stupid & easy to fool into believing lies. all theyve done is post some news stories that iran is bad & the peple are crazy. everyone in usa believes it & are dumb enough to follow allong like cattle. theres a saying, 'those who can be made to believe absurdities can be made to commit atrocoties'. im sorry.\nhttp://scotthortonshow.com/\nhttp://thestressblog.com\nhttp://www.kaos959.com\nhttp://www.antiwar.com\nmoney, http://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\neducation, \nhttp://www.philipdru.com/taylor_stream.html\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/gatto_stream.html\nww1 wilson,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=88\nww2 http://www.philipdru.com/stinnett_stream.html\nnam http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=108\nbush & clinton http://www.philipdru.com/triplett_stream.html\nisrael \nhttp://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/webb_stream.html\niran http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=131\ngovernment explained simply,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=98
877466
i just wanna say if the USA started a war with Iran.Iran well win.......and Iran well be the new strongest country in the world instead of the USA\nhope so
640825
That's funny...\nI'm an American, although I've never called Iran a terrorist country.
1116487
Iran is being threatened by the US after we attack Iraq.  In order to protect itself, it is seeking for defense in nuclear weapon.  If it does not get nuclear help, US will find other reason to attack Iran.  Maybe another Weapon of Mass Destruction, and after we conquer Iran, we will make a public speech stating that we got the wrong information from UK again.
449588
Bush will attack Iran very soon. He is looking for the next thing to direct the American people's attention away from the disgusting criminal activities of his administration and for the most part the whole Republican party. You Christians better get ready to kiss your asses goodbye if you truly believe whats written in the bible.\n\nThe only logical response to a first strike from the USA is for Iran to nuke Israel. And maybe European countries. They don't have the long range missiles to hit the USA but they will do as much damage to the government of Israel because the U.S. government funnels so much money into the country. And of course their hatred of Jews. When you see Iran push the button and before the nukes hit the ground Israel will have launched missiles at every Muslim nation in the Middle East area. The government of Israel feels that if it's going to be wiped out it will take every Muslim nation with it.
413984
no, there is no reasonable explanation why Iran should be allowed to enrich Uranium. I am not saying this because I am an American, I am saying this because I live on this planet, and no offense to anyone, but some of those Iranian extremists scare the crap out of me, because they would not think twice about completely obliterating our world with a nuclear or atomic weapon. Once again, no offense to Iranians who are not crazy extremists.
37791
The answer to that question is both yes and no. Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, understands that the world is still suffering oil shock from the recent natural disasters, in addition to the fact that the majority of the US Army and Marines are stabilizing Iraq. This entire plot to stare down the world is merely a tactic of “shock and awe”. \nThe bottom line is no other Middle Eastern country other than Syria has shown support for their actions. Also, no European or North American countries are supportive of their actions. \nIf embargos were enacted and Iran began withholding its oil, the world would not come to an end. Sure prices would rise, but often the will of the people is stronger than any economy or dictator. \nIf all trade was ceased between the majority of the world and Iran, the economic repercussions for Iran would be disastrous. As it is, the government is terribly unstable, faces daily democracy marches, and only gains support through Islamic extremism and terror. \nFinally, if war were to break out, Iran is positioned right between two US allies, Afghanistan and Iraq. This would provide ample staging areas for any type of offensive. Also, as demonstrated during the first gulf war and to some extent during the second, the American and European militaries are designed for short term hit and run tactics which allows modern technology to be used most efficiently. If Iran was to stop selling its oil, it would hurt many countries that might have had a neutral stance at the beginning. With this being true, any military action could easily see the most global coalition that modern warfare has ever seen.\nacansco@yahoo.com