who is the presedent of Iraq?
451834
America. They're occupied by us. Making us in charge.
920675
USA face the reality when called the exestance of USA army in Iraq  by OCUPATION not( librate army take authnefication from  the  national security cauncel  or united nation  and the Iraq goverment doll ) at this moment situation will be better
302789
The US President, George HW Bush.\n\nPretty much self-explanatory.
957367
Many resons, the UN security council stated they had WMD. Iraq is a stratigic point in controlling the middle east. It keeps the fight off American soil to keep the civiilian causalities down.
746942
I don't care about his past as long as he can execute the winning strategy in Iraq. Iraq is the major American interest for now.
883273
Here's a question to the President:\n\nWho says that Iraq NEEDS to be a Democracy in the first place?\n\nLook at Saudi Arabia.  While they're certainly NOT the immaculate image of what a great country should be, the we're not locked in any sort of standoff with them.  Saudi Arabia is ruled by a Royal Family.  Jordan also is ruled by royalty, which the U.S. has pretty good relations with.  Yet Iran & Iraq, which both has/had oppressive presidents, we have problems with.\n\nMake Iraq a kingdom.  We won't have any problems with them then.  Of give them another type of government (there are dozens to choose from.)  I think trying to make them like the U.S. (which worked for us, but may not for them, since they DIDN'T revolt their leadership by themselves) could actually hurt them.  The last thing they want right now (I can only assume) is to have the exact same type of government they did under Saddam.\n\nNow, it's a given they won't be nearly as oppressed under the new leadership, but still, if I were an Iraqi, the last thing I would want is to see the word "president" on T.V.\n\nThis might be kind of far out there, but I actually don't think making them in our image is a good idea.
322685
Bush, of course. 30,000 Iraqis, 3000 allied troops.
945746
Rumsfeld\n\nBy the way.  The way the previous answer was presented is very obnoxious.
1024061
The truth is it is the United States of America who is the real terrorist in Iraq.  We will end up like Vietnam. On the losing end.
824675
To have a constitutional government elected by the people. But the USA led force do not enjoy the trust of the people. Hence, anything done at the behest of the combined force will be lacking legitimacy. It is under UN supervision that an interim government be constituted to hold election for constituent body to frame the future constitution for Iraq. Then only normalcy will come back.
709084
There is oil in Iraq and the US wanted it.
707571
Bush knows the answer to that one...\n\nImplications- Iraq, for example.
906493
Unfortunately, Iraq will be united with Iran. Shiites are the majority in Iraq. If there is a democratic government elected by the majority, it will be Shiite. Shiites run Iran. Iran is a shiite nation. No bashing, but Bush has created an impossible situation. Bush is right about Iran being the axis of evil. So what the hell do we do now? Please. We must not ask Iran for help in Iraq. Oh, by the way, in Democracy, you do not kill the people who disagree with you. The so called Iraq government is a puppet regime.
969286
I agree that this is obvious.  Iraq was probably the hegemon in the Middle East before the US invasion, though Iran had already been clamoring for increased power and influence in the region.  Now that Iraq has fallen into great turmoil, Iran now has an opportunity to increase its influence and establish itself as the leading Muslim nation, much as the US is considered the leading democratic nation.  Iran has much to gain from a destabilized Iraq, and is thus contributing to the violence through weapons sales.
60250
President of Iraq: Jalal Talabani\n\nJalal Talabani (in Kurdish:ﻰﻧ ﺎﺑﻪﻟﺎﺗ ﻝﻻﻪﺟ /Celal Talebanî )(in Arabic: جلال طالباني: jalâl tâlabânî) (born 1933), Iraqi politician, was named President of Iraq on April 6, 2005 by the Iraqi National Assembly. Talabani is founder and secretary general of one of the main Iraqi Kurdish political parties, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). He was a prominent member of the Interim Iraq Governing Council, which was established following the overthrow of the Saddam Hussein regime by the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.
534742
THE IDEA IS TO KEEP THEM OUT OF THE HANDS OF COUNTRIES THAT ARE UNSTABLE.SOME COUNTRIES CHANGE LEADERSHIP FOUR X IN A TWO YEAR PERIOD.IF IRAQ HAS THEM WHO CONTROLS THEM ? SUNNIS KURDS. IT HAS TO STOP OR WE'LL BE IN W.W.III IN A HEARTBEAT.
288689
Iraq is like Yuoslavia.  Yuoslavia was an artificial country forced together by a strong dictator.  When the dictator was removed, the country fell apart. Iraq is one of the last remnants of the British-French colonial era.  It was cobbled together by the British as part of an effort to maintain a land route to India.  Iraq is not a homogenous group of people with a common heritage or religion. It consists of Kurds, Sunnis, and Shites.  The best thing for Iraq would be to split it up along the lines of these three groups, just as Yugoslavia disintegrated into several smaller entities.  Short of that, the only way to keep Iraq together as a cohesive unit will be for another strong dictator to appear and bring these diverse groups together by force. The concept of democracy as backed by the United States will never work in Iraq. After the Americans leave the country will either break apart in bloody war or be held together by a ruthless strongman.  Democracy is not and has never been a viable option.