orange county register article on unfair judges?
455021
Go to their website: http://www.ocregister.com and do a search for your article.  The link below is the search results I was able to find.
846053
I saw that, too, and thought it was amusing.  How would you like to have been the election judge working THAT precinct??  LOL!!\n\nHopefully he had time to go home and get his card and then come back to vote!
298504
I'm not quite sure what Thylawyer is trying to say.  One minute he's bashing Republicans for preventing the FTC from doing their job, then he posts the link to a news article which headlines..."FTC Wins $10 Million Judgment Against Fraudulent Debt Collectors".\n\nDemocracts...sheesh!\n\nOk, lets all open up our books...The Fair Credit Reporting Act (do a search..)\n\nOpen to section 813.  It says you can sue a collector in court for the cost of actual damage, plus any punititive damage awarded by the judge up to $1000 for each instance, plus court cost and legal fees.\n\nNow turn to page 814...It gives "Administrative" juristiction to the FTC so that they can actually shut down or give huge fines to collection agencies.  (please note the aforementioned news article).\n\nThis is a war people!  Get armed!  Knowledge of the law is your only weapon!\n\nBy the way....in my opinion the Better Business Bureau is a completely worthless group to complain to about anyone.  They have absolutely no power to do anything.  There are groups that are currently educating people on how to bring suits up in small claims court.  It will completely depend on where you live, and their court rules, if you will be able to do it also.\n\nAnd while each state also has their own rules governing collections, the Attorney General's office usually will not get involved unless a whole lot of people are affected.  They will send you a politely worded letter informing you to hire a lawyer and pursue it yourself.  Been there...done that....many times.\n\nPS....he's a Democrat too!  ;)
891669
There's a link to the blog at the 'home' page of Yahoo! Answers on the subject of violations, etc....Yahoo is getting some pretty good feedback.  Just thought you might like a head's up in case you wanted to go read & add your thoughts too.
108197
a county judge deals with minor - or viewed as such - matters. Local fraud, abuse, children...etc.\nMurders go to a higher judge. The Supreme Court usually.
504864
One judge I know found a woman in contempt for failure to show up when she was in labor.
1143263
A lot of people agree that it was Emanuel Augustus' fight with Courtney Burton. Aside of the referees calls, the decision by two of the judges for the hometown favorite was way off those of most boxing fans. The judges had it 99-90 and 97-92 for Burton and 98-94 for Augustus (most agreed with that one). The Michigan Commission was disgraced by the results and had an investigation to change things around.
174614
Can't disagree with chslaw (don't think I ever have, actually), but I have an alternate reason:\n\nThere's a damn lot of people living in this state.  At one time or another, someone here has done something stupid that someone else felt required some regulation or law to prevent from happening again, or to make sure it did happen again.\n\nA lot of bad criminal case law comes from Southern California, and I have always felt it was for the same reason.  There's a lot of cops down there, and a lot of stupid people (well, even some of the cops are), so they pull something goffy just about every day down there and it ends up turning into some kind of law or rule as a result.
194783
Honorable Judge then judge's name
479080
There is a lot of information on the internet about this topic.  I just typed "racial bias in capital punishment" and 196,000 results popped up.  If you enter each type of bias you will get plenty of source material.
280543
I'm sorry to say I can't answer the question its one of the stupidest things I have heard of. Not you question, but how they can bend you over the table like that.\n\nauntb93 really there is no such nonsense in CA?  \n\nThe state where someone can sue you for cutting themselves while breaking into your house, and win.\n\nAn elderly couple in CA filed a lawsuit against their neighbor over her 5:00 a.m. baths.  She was taking a bath before work and the noise from here pipes was waking them up.  She tried the problem fixed and they still were not satisfied.\n\nA man joined a group to learn, among other things, to fly through self-levitation. Unsatisfied with the results, he claimed psychological and physical damages...and sued the group for $9 million. \n\nA woman went to her friend's house and asked for a haircut. Unhappy with her new look, she claimed her friend had willfully, intentionally, and maliciously cut her hair without her consent...and sued him for $75,000.\n\nA man was invited to his parents' house to celebrate the Fourth of July. He became intoxicated. And when one of the fireworks he brought with him to the party did not ignite, he went over to inspect it, and it exploded in his face. He sued his parents, the co-worker who sold him the fireworks and his employer. \n\nA teacher in CA got fired for having her students send letters to troops stationed in Iraq, while many teachers in CA had their students send letter to Governor Schwarzenegger on behalf of Tookie Williams without so much as a letter of reprimand.\n\nI grew up in CA and my dad made me read the whole paper before he would allow me to read the sports page.  I thought it was unfair then but today I'm glad he made me keep myself informed.  No nonsense in CA?  Don't make me laugh!
173665
I heard something regarding Family Dollar and unfair labor practice if that's what you are referring to.\nhttp://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff41294.htm
270971
http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/editorial/1140744342284740.xml&coll=7
647535
I'm not sure if you can find this information easily (maybe if you call your local Republican or Democratic party headquarters or your local courthouse?).\n\nRegardless, hopefully the Judge hands down his ruling independently based on the evidence and precedent, not his political leanings.
899475
Judges shouldn't be rewarded seats via their political contributions!\n\nJudgeships should rewarded by their merit, qualifications, and their competence.
794617
It isn't, despite the attempts of the idiot-child and his controllers.\n\nThe most recent election clearly yanked the chains of those in power. We're still stuck with some horrible judges, though, who apparently are perfectly willing to have you locked up because you think "wrong." But, they are somewhat marginalized.\n\nGood luck to you
1050327
I actually had the show on today, but failed to get any details....or have since forgotten.  Try judgejoebrowndotcom  or fox.com (or whatever network it was on) and look for links like About This Show, or Ask our Staff, or similar.\n\nGood luck!