what are strenghts and weaknesses of federalism in India?
299273
sorry, i couldnt find anything on google about it.\nhttp://scotthortonshow.com/\nhttp://thestressblog.com\nhttp://www.kaos959.com\nhttp://www.antiwar.com\nmoney, http://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\neducation, \nhttp://www.philipdru.com/taylor_stream.html\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/gatto_stream.html\nww1 wilson,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=88\nww2 http://www.philipdru.com/stinnett_stream.html\nnam http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=108\nbush & clinton http://www.philipdru.com/triplett_stream.html\nisrael \nhttp://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/webb_stream.html\niran http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=131\ngovernment explained simply,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=98
839702
Federalism is a system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units (like states or provinces), creating what is often called a federation. Proponents are often called federalists. In Canada, federalism means opposition to sovereigntist movements (usually that of Quebec). In Europe, "federalist" is often used to describe those who favor a stronger federal government (or European Union government) and weaker provincial governments. The same is historically true in the United States, with those who generally favor a confederation, or weaker federal government and stronger state governments, being called "anti-federalists". However, in recent years in America "federalism" has come to be associated with opposition to a stronger federal government.
449893
the state government has to give in their proposals for grants.depending on many factors, the fed govt forwards grants to those states.if the state govt really needs development more funds are allowed..or if the state is of national importantce like the capital, more funds are forwarded...
887645
This usually relates to a fundamental change in the way a country is governed to federalism- for example the Phillipines recently proposed Charter Change.\n\nAs far back as the colonization of Spain, the country has been governed from Manila, the nation's capital. In the current debate for Charter Change, proponents of federalism believe that it is the answer to the age-old problems of inequitable distribution of wealth, slow pace of development in the country side, and the peace and order situation in Mindanao.\n\nThe country has enacted legislation that would bring the government closer to the people through administrative deconcentration and political devolution, most importantly the Local Government Code (LGC) of 1991. Despite the success of local governments in the implementation of the LGC, much is still to be desired in the decentralization of governance in the country.
1112397
A dual system of government is also known as Federalism. \n\nFederalism is the separation of power between the federal and state governments.
735356
It may sound good but in practice it gives birth to numerous auxiliary problems. Systems are similar in all the states so it hardly matters whether it is small or big. Moreover in these days of ICT everything and anything is possible under the tip of the fingers if administration is alert and active. Finally even if this demand is met, the number of demands would be increased from other states. In that regard all 602 districts need to be taken care of separately. But the present system, under which the district administration is empowered fully to operate and develop, is the final and the lasting choice. One should feel Indian not by slogans alone but by mood and might along with meaning and manners without fear and fight.\nRegards
684477
Because merit is not recognised and people get admissions in university courses and jobs on basis of caste reservations. This way those who not deserve get to study in higher educational institutes and bag cushy jobs while the deserving meritorious students are denied all this. The Indian politicians have kept the country weak by following the same 'Divide and Rule' policy initiated by the British rulers. If India is freed of these selfish politicians who divide the society in to various castes to increase their vote banks India will become a great strong country
271576
The main weaknesses of the articles of confederation was:\n1. There was no executive, just the continental congress there was no one person at the helm.\n2. Every state had the right to establish foreighn policy.\n3. Every state had the right to produce and regulate currency.\n4. There was no body to solve disputes between states.
1103695
I can't say much about corruption in India but I can tell you how we are fighting it in Albania.\nAt first you need a rotation of power and than you should follow the law rather than making new ones.\nIt is not a problem of legislature but how you practice law.
792430
The Articles of Confederation didn't create a functioning nation, so the Constitution created a federal system with a unified currency, post, foreign policy etc., while letting the states decide less national matters.
644370
Because its predecessor, the Articles of Confederation, failed:\n\n"[The Articles of Confederation] had three great weaknesses:\n(1) It had no means of revenue independent of that received through its requisitions on the States, which were nothing more than requests, which the States could and did disregard; and it had no control over foreign or interstate commerce. \n(2)  Behind these lacks was its inability to compel the States to honor the national obligations. It could make treaties but had no means to compel obedience to them; or to provide for the payment of the foreign debt. It had responsibility but no power as a national government; no means of coercing the States to obedience even to the very inadequate grant given to the "League of Friendship" by the Articles of Confederation. \n(3)But its greatest weakness was that it had no direct origin in, or action on, the people themselves; but, unlike both the Declaration of Independence and the later Constitution, knew only the States and was known only to them, calling them sovereign." http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution_q_and_a.html\n\nAbout the Article of Confederation (1781): http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/charters_of_freedom_4.html\n\nHistory of the Constitution: http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution_history.html\n\nConstitution FAQs: http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution_q_and_a.html
136648
There were not enough Federalists in the congress to support the constitution
1062020
Federal has a greater jurisdiction or control area than the State has. Feds. also have much more power and control than the State does.
1041128
Politically unstable with a high level of illiteracy, mixed with religious fanaticism.\n\nForever causing brinkmanship with its neighbor India over the Kashmir region.
705463
1. Each state had their own money and some states didnt except other states money.\n\n2. The states had more power than the federal government and it was hard for the federal gov to get taxs.\n\n3. When the states voted on a national law they all had to agree or it wouldnt get passed, thus not very many things got passed.
140916
federalism is the notion of a strong, centralized government. anti federalism is about states rights. since we are a federalist republic, that means what washington says takes precedence over what a state capital says. for example, some states have a medical marijuana law. the fed govt says marijuana is illegal in all cases. so its off to jail you go if the atf comes to your house. there may be some semblance of these doctrines to the parties.
1015469
right now all the countries care about showing off their powers and not really thinking about what they definitely need to improve on. I'm originally from india and as u have probably heard that india's economy is improving dramatically. Well, if you ask me, it difinitely is improving army bases business but a majority of the poor is still in india.