What is the total rate of inflation over the past 100 years?
438433
The standard for this type of information is from the Ibbotson Associates book, which gets updated every year.  It costs a bit of money, but you might be able to find a copy at your local library.  There are random sites once in a while that summarize the information for display purposes, such as this one: http://www.fundadvice.com/fehtml/psychhurdles/0502.html
503501
Assuming that the matter concerned remains the same (e.g. a coke), inflation essentially means that its price has increased over time (e.g. from $1 to $1.25). It can be caused by deflation of currency (e.g. Brazil), economy growth (price driven up when demand > supply) etc.\n\nThe impact of inflation to economy is immense and is hard to be explained in this forum. Suffice to say is that it is an indicator closely monitored by most governments.
112892
118,756.52 USD (Today)
854399
That is a difficult question, I have never seen such information on line. I would guess that the rate vary considerably, as you probably have.\nI wonder if a call to the BBC would yield a lead?\nAlso, those professors at various unis, economists, political science, entertainment departments may offer ideas. \nThe above is the best I can do. Please keep us all posted what you find.
201308
I have seen estimates ranging from 100 billion to 1 trillion.
329647
First Class Stamp Rates ... 2000-2006 (and date they went into effect).\n\n2000 - .33    (Jan. 10, 1999)\n2001 - .34    (Jan. 07, 2001)\n2002 - .37    (Jun. 30, 2002)\n2003 - .37 \n2004 - .37 \n2005 - .37 \n2006 - .39    (Jan. 08, 2006)
1133658
Look at the charts\n\nAbout ten years ago!\n\nChris
451611
between now and 1962 inflation has rose at approximately 2.8% a year. Thus to calculate the Present Value (PV) of $25 over the last 44 years (1962-2006), we can set up the following formula:\n\nPV($25)= $25 * 1.028^44.\n\n=25 * 3.371\n\n=84.26\n\n----------\n\nThus, $25 in 1962 is equivalent to $84.26 now.
73773
100 Rs become Rs 200 in 8 years if we add 12.5 Rs every year. So rate of interest should be 12.5 %
586046
it depends of the situations. But the general answer is 100 years.
296113
Here is a table I prepared for you:\n\nyear | inflation\n  \n1955  |    -0.4\n1956  |    1.5\n1957  |    3.3\n1958  |    2.8\n1959  |    0.7\n1960  |    1.7\n1961  |    1\n1962  |    1\n1963  |    1.3\n1964  |    1.3\n1965  |    1.6\n1966  |    2.9\n1967  |    3.1\n1968  |    4.2\n1969  |    5.5\n1970  |    5.7\n1971  |    4.4\n1972  |    3.2\n1973  |    6.2\n1974  |    11\n1975  |    9.1\n1976  |    5.8\n1977  |    6.5\n1978  |    7.6\n1979  |    11.3\n1980  |    13.5\n1981  |    10.3\n1982  |    6.2\n1983  |    3.2\n1984  |    4.3\n1985  |    3.6\n1986  |    1.9\n1987  |    3.6\n1988  |    4.1\n1989  |    4.8\n1990  |    5.4\n1991  |    4.2\n1992  |    3\n1993  |    3\n1994  |    2.6\n1995  |    2.8\n1996  |    2.9\n1997  |    2.3\n1998  |    1.6\n1999  |    2.2\n2000  |    3.4\n2001  |    2.8\n2002  |    1.6\n2003  |    2.3\n2004  |    2.7\n2005  |    3.4
467749
Yes. A dollar is equal to 100 cents.
61273
He makes very little moeny actually, especially when considering the fact that he's basically on the job 24/7, even when he's on vacation. In fact, accounting for inflation, the President has not made as little since 1873. When the President's salary was raised in 1909, the inflation adjusted rate was $1,419,792.55 in 2001 dollars, compared to his last raise to $400,000, less than a third as much.
346225
The exchange rate is roughly twice as much, so it's around $100,000 to $110,000.
158495
Basically adjust for inflation or deflation in the money to compare the increases in waves earned from one year to another
253383
Recent employment data suggests that we are nearing full employment. This last occured in 2001, just before the air was let out of the economy. Before that, we were teased with near-full employment in 1996. \n\nWhere our economy goes depends on how interest rates are played. If they are allowed to continue rising, as they should (offset inflation), we'd still be below historical levels and economic growth would slowly decline. If they are held static or are somehow reduced, further economic activity would occur, which would overheat our economy. Either way, I see us nearing an apex. \n\nThe question is whether that apex is relatively small or large in scale to the economic growth we experienced since 1996. \n\nWho's to say. \n\nBut if all you're asking is whether we're in a trough or peak right now, my guesstimate is peak.
393664
Per year? Or since 1776?