Why india is not given a permanent place in UNO?
435539
Because of China's objections.
624189
S.A.\nI HARDLY COMPARED IT.\nYOUR OPTIONS ARE TOO BETTER THAN INDIA.
548523
obviously , the governoment should provide the OBC reservation  for the ppl who are participating in the sports also , if they \nprovide reservation for theOBC'S in the education  . \n\nBut it is difficult task to fight in this situation now ( as we are trying not to get any OBC'S reservation ).\n\nBut we can't see the fights for the quotas in the sports also \nbecoz  it consists of only 11 members(very few members) .
198533
They do not have the weapons.\nThey can if they want to....many options available to them.\nThey want to prove to the world that the UNO is manipulated by the USA and western powers and this nonsense has to stop someday.
74676
India qualified for the 1950 FIFA World Cup after a number of teams withdrew from the tournament. However, they declined to participate after FIFA prohibited playing barefoot. \n\nIndia's application for the 1954 tournament was not accepted and they did not compete in a qualifier until the preliminary stages of the 1986 tournament.
678163
well fo sure ........nobody knows. but the most likely reason can be to gain international respect vis-a-vis united states as it happened in the case of india . also to have a dominating position in the midle east given its complex geopolitical situation and also have an upper hand with respect to israel. dont forget israel also has nuclear weapons but nobody is concerned about that.........
1171574
Only once in 1950.  That too because Burma, Indonesia and Philippines refused to play the world cup, ultimately India got the chance to play the world cup.  But Indians as they practiced Foodball by bare foot wanted to play world cup only bare foot; which the FIFA refused and asked the Indian players to wear shoes.  Indian players refused and they did not play even a single match of the world cup.  \n\nOut of print - actual reason was, Indian federation did not have enough money to send the team to world cup.\n\nThereafter India did not even qualify for the big event.\n\nThis year also India finished third in the regional tournement and as Japan came first, they qualified.
948439
I have a political science BS and the UN as worthless as they are never sanctioned anyone to invade anywhere.  That would take huevos and authority, neither of which the UN possess.\nSeriously though the UN is only a small step above the League of Nations in that the US participate, kind of.  If we didn't it would financially collapse, have no home or military authority.  Where would they meet?  The Hague,  I don't even think there is a real airport there
56453
Yes, UN is outdated and could not survive without the U.S.A. The big fix is that the security council needs to be re-constituted with the following most populous and influential nations in the 21st Century:\n\nUSA\nChina\nRussia\nIndia\nEuropean Union\nIndonesia\nBrazil
1047357
Since we are Americentric the "World" consists of America and possibly Canada.  If India wanted to host the world series of say Polo we wouldn't make a fuss.  Also some of you are so dated, the Montreal expos are long gone
608260
THE FOLLOWING CAN BE SAID AS THE REASONS FOR THAT :-\n\n1. THE U.S NOW HAS ADOPTED AN INDIA CENTRIC POLICY BY SIGNING THE NUCLEAR DEAL WITH INDIA .IT WANTS INDIA TO STAND UP AGAINST CHINA WHICH IS ALSO A RIVAL OF INDIA .\n\n2. ALSO INDIA IS NOW FAST BECOMING A MAJOR ECONOMIC AND MILITARY POWER .SO IT NEEDS INDIA TO BE ITS ALLY IN THE FUTURE .\n\n3. INFACT IT IS NOW SILENTLY ALLOWING INDIA TO ACT OF ITS OWN AFTER INDIA VOTED AGAINST IRAN IN U.N COUNCIL.\n\n4. ALSO THE U.S IS SURE THAT THE PROPOSED GAS PIPE LINE IS NOT A EASY JOB - SINCE IT INVOLVES 3 COUNTRIES INCLUDING ARCH RIVALS INDIA AND PAKISTAN . ALSO INDIA VOTED AGAINST IRAN . SO ITS NOT EASY FOR A 3 NATION AGREEMENT .\n\n5. YESTERDAY IRAN HAS DECLARED THAT IT CANNOT SUPPLY THE GAS TO INDIA .
893698
I actually want a distance between India and the Muslim states.\nIn this respect I would prefer India to increase cordiality with states like Japan, the USA, Israel and the EU etc.\n\nAlthough, having stated this, our major long term threat is not Paki Land, it is China.  China has already begun to make inroads everywhere, and if India doesn't try and compete we will show ourselves to be the biggest political novices on the face of the earth.
917542
The UN is controlled by the security council where the permanent members have a veto.They are first and foremost responsible for any failure of the UN in anything.I admit it's more than annoying but it's also weird to blame the UN as a front to not have to blame the world community.\nThe UN can only be as strong or as weak as its members
598645
Countries don't "participate" in dual citizenships. Countries allows its citizens to hold two different passports. Say you are from country X, and you go to country Y. Country X allows dual citizenship while country Y doesn't. You, who is an country X citizen, will be able to hold both X and Y citizenship b/c your country of origin allows for dual citizenships, even if the new country doesn't allow duals, or recognise country X.\n\nGovernment of India decided to grant Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) which most people mistakenly refer as 'dual citizenship'.
758214
To me UNO looks like International Olympic Committee designed to be play ground of Rich Aristocrats who are appointed to this organization through their political connections at home countries and abroad.It gives them chance to live most of the time in New York and travel world wide literally for free.Their Motto is "LOOK BUSY DO NOTHING"\nDISSOLVE DISSOLVE DISSOLVE if you can.
718492
Kashmir is part of India.  This question is like asking why Florida is not a free country.  It is part of India.
655600
1st of all the facts need to be put in front of people before answering the question with misguiding facts. In fact it was the Hindu Maharajah of Kashmir who was forcefully compelled to sign on document of merging the then state of Jummu and Kashmir with the union of India. This pact was against the wishes of india who stood against the Raja and started fighting against. If we look back into the history of those days we will come to find that the Britishers were also involved in the game. As per principles of the Indian division muslim majority areas were to form the Pakistan while the areas where other communities are in majority were to be included in remaining india. Based on this principle Gurdaspur and ferozpure and other muslim majority areas should have been included in Pakistan, but Mr. Red-Cliff the so called judge and head of boundary commission in order to provide a way to india to Kashmir throuhg Gurdaspur these muslim majority areas where included in india and biggest migration of the century took place in which almost two million people where mascared in east punjab. The story did not end here, the brutalities continuied in all parts of the so called secular state of the world. \n\nThen the world saw another face of so called greatest democracy of the world. The case was put in front of UN by the india itself, after being force by the libration of the people of the state. Although the Russian were backing the indian cause in UN by going far ahead the world was compelled to regard the rights of Kashmiris and it was unanimously decided the UN security council that the fate of the state will decided upon wishes of the people of the state. There will be an option voting for the people of the state whether they want join india or pakistan. It is worthwhile to mention here that there was no 3rd option in the both the UN resolutions on Kashmir. I respect a lot toi the great Jawar Lal Nehru as leader who guided india in its early days of independence, he also accpeted these UN resolutions publically. But later on he refused to accpet the genuine right of the people.\n\nIt is 1988 and now the people of the state started a military struggle for their freedom which was later dominated by the so called Jihadis. Now there are also vioces in the valley for the 3rd option (Kashmiris should neither join Pak nor India, they should have their own country). Although pakistan does not accept this option, but in my own view this should by an option for the people and if they wanna excercise they should be able to do so. \n\nAt last fighting has never been an option / solution for the problems both india and pakistan fought almost 5 wars on this contentious issue but ... we dont have a solution yet. Dialouge and negtiations are the only ways of solving all the issues but both the parties should have postive frame of mind for the resulotion of all the matters and there should be will for solving the problems of sufferng Kashmiris.