What does Dism.-furth. of justice mean?
450792
Dismisal for furtherince of justice.  Meaning the case has been dismissed.
1023555
Yes, that's exactly it.  \n\nJustice is an illusion of humanity.  \n\nGod does not need justice because God has no need to condemn us.  Judgment and condemnation are human qualities constructed by humans.  God needs nothing from us.  God is everything.
405133
I think it is antidisesentablishmentarianism.Haven't got a clue what it means. Look it up.
44115
Disestablishment is the act of seperating church and state.  So antidisestablishmentarianism is the belief system that Church and State should be one.\n\nA good use of the word would be:\n"Bush is foolish for thinking that antidisestablishmentarianism is constitutional"
1078785
Wow. I can only imagine the flack you're going to receive over that imflammatory statement, but I'm sitting here trying to see where you were going with this question. I think you might be saying that if we all go off in different directions, we can't accomplish anything. If so, I can certainly see your point, and agree with it to a degree. God is not about division - he adds and multiplies. Sometimes we, His people, can get caught up focusing on individual styles and differences, and forget that He wants us to love and accept each other as opposed to judging. Our own human fallacies bring the division -- we feel inadequate so we must find fault in the ways of others. As for justice, I for one stand with those who don't seek justice. Instead, give me mercy every time.\n\nBest wishes for harmony :)\n~Tia~
170714
Deep within his conscience man discovers a law which he has not laid upon himself but which he must obey. Its voice, ever calling him to love and to do what is good and to avoid evil, sounds in his heart at the right moment. . . . For man has in his heart a law inscribed by God. . . . His conscience is man's most secret core and his sanctuary. There he is alone with God whose voice echoes in his depths.\n\nMoral conscience, present at the heart of the person, enjoins him at the appropriate moment to do good and to avoid evil. It also judges particular choices, approving those that are good and denouncing those that are evil. It bears witness to the authority of truth in reference to the supreme Good to which the human person is drawn, and it welcomes the commandments. When he listens to his conscience, the prudent man can hear God speaking.\n\nConscience is a judgment of reason whereby the human person recognizes the moral quality of a concrete act that he is going to perform, is in the process of performing, or has already completed. In all he says and does, man is obliged to follow faithfully what he knows to be just and right. It is by the judgment of his conscience that man perceives and recognizes the prescriptions of the divine law.\n\nIt is important for every person to be sufficiently present to himself in order to hear and follow the voice of his conscience. This requirement of interiority is all the more necessary as life often distracts us from any reflection, self-examination or introspection.\n\nThe dignity of the human person implies and requires uprightness of moral conscience. Conscience includes the perception of the principles of morality (synderesis); their application in the given circumstances by practical discernment of reasons and goods; and finally judgment about concrete acts yet to be performed or already performed. The truth about the moral good, stated in the law of reason, is recognized practically and concretely by the prudent judgment of conscience. We call that man prudent who chooses in conformity with this judgment.\n\nConscience enables one to assume responsibility for the acts performed. If man commits evil, the just judgment of conscience can remain within him as the witness to the universal truth of the good, at the same time as the evil of his particular choice. The verdict of the judgment of conscience remains a pledge of hope and mercy. In attesting to the fault committed, it calls to mind the forgiveness that must be asked, the good that must still be practiced, and the virtue that must be constantly cultivated with the grace of God.\n\nConscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject authoritative teachings.\n\nThe education of the conscience is a lifelong task. From the earliest years, it awakens the child to the knowledge and practice of the interior law recognized by conscience. Prudent education teaches virtue; it prevents or cures fear, selfishness and pride, resentment arising from guilt, and feelings of complacency, born of human weakness and faults. The education of the conscience guarantees freedom and engenders peace of heart.\n\nIn the formation of conscience the Word of God is the light for our path, we must assimilate it in faith and prayer and put it into practice. We must also examine our conscience before the Lord's Cross. We are assisted by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, aided by the witness or advice of others and guided by the authoritative teaching of the Church.
418368
They essentially mean the same thing, and also are pretty clear if you have read much of the bible. Man, as originally created wasn't supposed to die (immortal, just as God), but, when Adam and Eve disobeyed the only single rule they were given, not to eat of the tree of Knowledge of good and evil, God took immortality from them.  The only way to redemption of your soul after that was the Mosaic law, basically the 10 commandments and all the other thousands of little inconsequential rules the preisthood (the Levites) felt needed to be added. This is EXACTLY the same as the mess the mullas and fanitical clerics have made of the pretty simple laws of Islam.  But thats another story...  Jesus, coming as a mortal man (by man came also the resurrection) freed mankind from the Levitical/Mosaic law by his sacrifice.\n\nAs for the second scripture, Same thing, because of Adams sin (disobedience) we all now are mortal, (For as in Adam, all die) but, "Even so in christ, all shall be made alive" which means through Jesus' sacrifice, we are freed from eternal death.
742699
Who told you God was the first to make laws for humans?  Who is this God you are referring to?  Sodom and gomorrah is passe, now it is called anarchism.
834509
Socrates takes the position that requiting injustice by retaliation or warding off evil by evil ("anti-dike") is always wrong, and is just as wrong as committing injustice ("a-dike") in the first place. Socrates tells Crito that this opinion, that it is wrong to resist evil, never has been, and never will be held by the vast majority of mankind. He thinks it is an important moral yardstick, adding that people who do not agree on this point have no common ground and must necessarily despise ("kata-phronein") each other. He says that this premise will be taken as true for the purpose of their discussion (49d).\n\nCrito says he agrees with Socrates, that "anti-dike" is as wrong as "a-dike", but in fact, neither seems to trouble him. Crito has no more qualms about bribing a friend's way out of prison than he had bribing his own way in for a morning visit. Neither man seems to notice that, according to Socrates, they should not even be friends because they are so far apart morally.\n\nSocrates' claim that "resisting evil by any means other than persuasion is evil" is an ancient statement of moral pacificism. Socrates rests its logical defense entirely upon a analogy. He says that a citizen stands in relation to the state as the child does to the parent, as the slave does to his master. He says that the state has brought him into the world (by regulating marriage), nurtured and educated him. Socrates says that he is the offspring ("ek-gonos") and slave ("doulos") of the state and has no right to "destroy" the state by failing to obey it (50e) after it has been so beneficient to him.\nJust about everyone believes that death is an evil for the person who dies.  Yet there are well-known difficulties for this view.  Perhaps the most important difficulty was raised by Epicurus in the following famous passage from his “Letter to Menoeceus”:\n\nNagel asserts that death, the most terrifying of ills, is nothing to us, since so long as we exist, death is not with us; but when death comes, then we do not exist.  It does not then concern either the living or the dead, since for the former it is not, and the latter are no more. \n\n  Anything that is bad for someone must be bad for that person at a particular time.  There is no time at which death is bad for the one who dies.  (Death is not bad for someone before she dies; it is not bad for her once she dies, because from that point on she no longer exists.)  Therefore, death is not bad for the one who dies.\n\nWhile some still find this argument attractive, most find its conclusion to be obviously false; thus much effort has been expended trying to refute its premises.
112829
The meaning is a little broader than simply revenge.  The term "eye for an eye" appears in Exodus 21:24-25.  It is about compensation for injuries and also criminal penalties (i.e. let the punishment fit the crime).
36725
Three Fwd Wishes: Grace => Mercy => Peace(Rest).\n\nPst - the D-evils "believe" there is one God, yet perhaps what they believe is their law is God.\n\nThe "grace" of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen. \n\nSource(s):\n\nHoly Bible is not Holy Holy in the end is already written.
733524
Grand Ayatollah Sistani, as we all know, no decree is infallible, as man is not infallible, which does make for the reasoning behind these decrees coming to being in the first place, which makes divine inspired laws, or even earthly laws (which some may feel to be the same thing), just a wish, command, or a good intention through this understanding.  If this were not so, the word infallible would not be in every dictionary on the globe.  Free will is what enables man to find himself in the right place, if he so chooses wisely, as to these decrees, in any religion.(or society)  Free will is what also enables man to find himself imprisoned, or worse, if he so chooses poorly, as to these decrees, in any religion (or society)  Most laws are dictated in America, and elsewhere, by the norms, and popular beliefs of values.  And these values have remained pretty much the same for thousands of years, and in almost all cases, civility and rights towards other humans has actually very much improved.  And oddly, throughout VAST time, what was taboo then, and hidden, for whatever reason, still is today, globally, Grand Ayatollah Sistani.  And although some things do not fit within my realm of norm, I do know that many freedoms of choice that do not hurt others, when restrained, can hurt others.  As an example of changes in other ways, or out-dated in realm of the norm, I don't think marrying family is accepted at all in decrees any longer, like as it was acceptable in the Old Testament, but we know through science now that this tends to cause unnecessary mental-illness and deformity issues.  I feel that globally, most of the world treats each other in a civilized and rational manner.  But I also feel that some divine decrees made, and expected to be adhered to, are uncivilized, irrational and tyrannical as far as towards the treatment of other human beings.  It is like imprisonment on earth for some, so I have heard.  Which Church was it that broke away from the Catholic Church due to what they, the Catholics, decreed as not a norm, yet had adolescent boys for entertainment almost nightly?  This is why we have separation of Church and State in America, this is why most decrees have stayed the same for a VERY, VERY long time, unless of course for your rational, or common-sense, moving forward decrees that have changed due to big-picture, long-haul, or facing the facts problems solving solutions that we haven't been able to fix others ways before.  I wish you the best of luck on your endeavors in Iraq, but will tell you that I am highly disappointed that I have not received a letter back from you, from your web-site you had provided here for this purpose, here at YA, in regards to some questions I had for you regarding the Iraq that you wish to represent.  It was a very long, well-thought out and respectful letter, so I am sure you could not have over-looked this one.  I have worked in politics before, and I can tell you, If I were your constituent, you would have lost me.  There is a saying in America, Grand Ayatollah Sistani, easy come, easy go.  Good Luck.
391256
"I will respect the right of any individual to chose not to believe in any form of divinity, without calling that person immoral, idiotic, illogical, or threaten them with any kind of eternal punishment."\n\n"I will respect the right of any individual to believe in any kind of divinity or deity they so wish, whether or not I doubt any such divinity or deity exists, and I will do so without calling that person illogical, idiotic or blind."\n\n"Furthermore, while I will stand up for my own right to believe or not believe in anything I so choose, I will not interfere with another's right to believe or not believe in anything they so choose, as along as they are not harming me or interfering with my rights." \n\n\n\nthe power of cut and paste i love it
873386
I agree with what MLKing said BUT what I have realized as I get older, is that justice is not immediate.\n\nWhat I mean is that say you see an act of evil, a lightning bolt does not come down out of the sky and punish the evil doer immediately. Justice takes time and is a lot slower than the false gains of an evil act.\n\nI guess justice is a double test... one that test our faith and one that test our patience. Remember the old saying, 'What goes around comes around." That is true but you have to wait on it to come back around. lol
816462
hi \n\nas far as my knowledge the meaning is as follows:\n\nhis honour being sheared(removed) and clothed(robed) in disgrace lies that child of destiny balendra kumar condemned \n\nwhich means : balendra kumar exclaimed on the altar that\n"the child's honour was tarnished and he was thought to be the disgrace"
567161
Long ago silver shred and the other barkmaskers had to deal with this. The legend has long since faded from the public consciousness so it is understandable that no one is alarmed at your cry. Forthwiththerefore some may task monkey this to be a falsicitude permutation of forlorn inquisitional parlayance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Oftenstance such thereothers are formed albeying but only when ditheryon and smittenherzens will it be proved. Only time will tell whether such absternasting is to become furthongin or not.
923905
"Truth and fairness" is the best translation, I think. \nIf the author had meant "justice" he would have used "iustitia".