If there was a tiny hole in the space station, how would the vaccum of space effect droplets of water if there
443544
To start with, the air and water would leak out of the station. The vacuum would not leak in.\n\nOnce the water droplets had passed through the hole, they would boil almost instantly into a gaseous form.  This conversion from liquid to water vapor would absorb a lot of heat (latent heat of vaporization) thus causing the temperature around the reaction to drop. This would have the potential to freeze some of the water before it has a chance to vaporize.
66949
Astronauts will not "explode" if their space suit depressurized. If you've ever seen how things act in a "vacuum" bell jar, it explains what would happen: liquids boil at lower temperatures at lower pressures, thus the liquids in the astronaut's body would vaporize and thus the astronaut would be killed (no blood=no oxygen to the brain, for example). Their body would remain intact because skin and other body parts are essentially solids.
719839
in the shuttle? absorbed and filtered. Their is still humidity but under control.\n\nIn the outer space there isn't any  just on rocks(asteroid)
56936
OK... let's get graphic.\nFirst off..... you'd die! No way around that!\nWhat would kill you first is the question.\nSpace is incredibly cold, so instant exposure to space would freeze almost all liquid in your body solid.\nSpace is also a HUGE vaccum, so all the air would be sucked out of you either while you're freezing solid, of during your freezing process.... either way, you'd suffocate if you didn't freeze by some miracle.\nSpace has absolutely no compromising pressure like the inside of our atmospere. Our bodies are used to a certain atmosperic pressure. Without it (I.E in space) if you didn't freeze or suffocate, eventually the lack of pressure would collapse our fragile bodies.\nThe possibilities for death are indeed endless.
795284
I've never heard of any such thing, and neither "fluffy waterballs" nor "fluffy water balls" returns a single result on Google.  ("Waterballs" and "water balls" do, but the results are mostly about snow globes and such.)  The only "balls" of water commonly known to hit the ground are raindrops.\n\nThat being said, there's no reason to assume that water would exist on any particular planet.
1126325
It's similar to the Venturi Principle, where the jet creates a vacuum effect as it punches a "hole" through the air above the water. Since nature proverbially abhors a vacuum, the surrounding air and the water beneath the hole rush to fill it.\n\nYou can create a similar effect by directing the stream from a compressed air blower between two parallel pieces of streamer material. You would think that the pieces of crepe paper would split away from one another; actually, they tend to come together.
931473
I have this very object. My foolish neighbor calls it an air humidifier, like he knows anything, ( he thinks we landed on the moon, I know crazy)\n     You can borrow it, but you have to come at night. My house is the one covered in tin foil and cloaked in the star trek special edition invisibility shield, with extra force field protons.
345992
Yes. The gravitational force is not that weak.\nNote also that the pressure difference is not sudden at all, higher and higher into the atmosphere, the pressure becomes lower as the weight of the particles above becomes less. As the pressure gets lower, the effect of gravity is also lower.\nWe do still lose some air particles into space, but not a significant quantity.
981333
http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/scienceques2002/20030516.htm
238439
Yeah, it's not a jet where air is pushed out.  It is a chemical reaction where chemicals are burned and thrust out the back of the ship.  It's like if you were floating as still as possible in zero G and blew air out hard.  you would move in the opposite direction.  If you held a little bottle of any gas under pressure and opened it, you would move.  Same basic principle. It's not pushing against the surrounding air, it's just pushing away from you regardless of whether it's a vacuum or in air.\n\nIn fact, in air you would get less of a push than you would in a vacuum.
297450
You are open to the absolute vacuum of space. Now if you understand vacuums the tighter it is the higher potential pressure on anything containing matter. Therefore when exposed to a vacuum all the fluids of your body will rapidly escape with the thin layers of flesh not even slowing them down. Think of a water balloon that has been overfilled.
180187
Nope. You couldn't fill anything. The balloon would just be empty. But why would you use a "hand pump" in space?
637566
It looked like the hover boards worked with some sort of magnet on the bottom that probably conteracted with the earth's magnetic force. Since, water isn't magnetic, the hoverboard wouldn't work on water. Thats what I thought at least.
627291
Nothing.  A warhead would have no effect, since it would be fryed, melted, crushed, and sucked into the black hole.  It wouldnt even make it past 10 feet before all of that happenes to it from a black hole.
434984
years ago i read a article about NASA and long space trips.  the one problem was water.  the solution was bring it with you.  the if by the use of sound waves putting H20 in space in the odd type of ship and it was being moved with sound waves.  Kinda cool idea.  but back to your question I would imagine that it is possible to have a sphere of water but it would have to be heavy water low oxygen in the water hence no plants and no life (as we know it).  i see it as having to be man made with some kinda core to bounce heat back into the water to keep it from freezing.
187607
The density of water is about 100 times the density of any gas .\nSo the gas will be lifted. (Archimedes law).\nBasicly the gravity energy decreases.
590630
How about a bowl of water beneath it? Is that within the rules? Alternatively one of the other posters is planning to drill a hole through the centre of the planet, you could always use their hole, it wouldn't break then!