If all the rights are reserved, what about the lefts?
447028
The lefts can go to hell
469955
i know very little people that would agree with a white supremacy group.  but no one can disagree that if you were to hinder their freedom of speech, no matter how disturbing it may be, it would take a step backwards in what this country was founded to do: ultimate freedom to beleive, demonstrate, and speak what they what they will.  if that's taken away, what do we have left?
247680
you need to set other people to have more rights
1000694
Just to expand on what has already been written, in a Democracy, the majority rules. If the majority decides that all left handed people should be enslaved, then they will be. This is what James Madison called a Mobocracy. Our country was founded as a Republic. Another aspect of a republic not mentioned in previous answers is the idea that the minority is spared from the tyranny of the majority. Just because the majority of people may want something doesn't necessarily make it right. Take slavery in the US for example. Or denying women the right to vote. I suppose Democracy can be too dangerous to those who do not fit in the standard social/economic profile of the time.
927159
The way you have defined it, I don't think there are any "hardcore leftist- Liberals" anymore.\n\nIt sounds more like what you're trying to do is to strawman anyone who is not like you into supporting all those bizarre positions.
752021
No, the radical left will insist on wastng time with investigations, and try to impeach Bush even though there is no cause for it.  The bush haters in the dem party of so crazed, they need thearpy.
1050796
No, the left doesn't have any definable core. No, they can't cut loose the fringe because the "fringe" is the only part of the left that still supports the looney agenda of liberals.
680828
left or right?  left, definitely.  right, i may have to ponder that for a while.  unless you're talking toes, then either one can go.
661787
First to the "RIGHT":  To stabilize the mighty power \nof potentates - with potency, force and violence.\n\nThen to the "LEFT":  Human dignity and reciprocalness \nin economic concerns is their first postulate.\n\nNote: Marx was NO "LEFT" at all, Marx and his followers \nare the most extreme "RIGHT". He desired the most \nextensive capitalism of all, the capitalism of the \nauthoritarian state.
353914
We have all the rights we refuse to abandon.  "Rights" must be preserved, honored and exercised in order to maintain them.  Eternal vigilance.  \n\nNOBODY can take away your right to freedom of speech unless you give up that right.  You may face conflict, but isn't that what Jesus told us would happen?  "Blessed are those who are hated for my name's sake."\n\n\nStand strong, put on the armor of God, and never give up your rights.
190154
No God Said That , He Said Dont Let The Right Know what the left is doing ! its a figure of speach and you must have a left, and a right, hand to do this
921570
Nice!  Of course we all deserve the same rights.  I like your question.  Brain bender.
798513
they have a lot more rights than they should
1097494
Stereotyping again!  \n\nYou are refering to the extremes of the extremists.  Don't treat all Christains like the nut jobs on the far right & I won't treat all Athiests like the nut jobs on the far left!\n\nThe nut jobs on the far left are also trying to impose restrictions on individual liberties.  Just different liberties.  Socialistic philosophy poses a real threat to our right to private property (money I worked hard for IS property!)  Many seem to want to outlaw any public mention of anything Christian.  And what about the constitutional right to bear arms.  The extremeist want ALL guns abolished! (As if the criminals would comply)\n\nI wouldn't try to label ALL liberals as if they are this extreme.
1144687
The left are considered liberals. Broadly speaking, liberalism seeks a society characterized by freedom of thought for individuals, limitations on power, especially of government and religion, the rule of law, the free exchange of ideas, a market economy that supports relatively free private enterprise, and a transparent system of government in which the rights of minorities are protected.\n\nThe right are considered conservative. To a conservative, the goal of change is less important than the insistence that change be effected with a respect for the rule of law and traditions of society.
990389
No I think both extremes are pretty wacked.  The left really has no agenda - just hatred of everything moderate and to the right.  At least I don't get or understand the far lefts agenda.  The radical right agenda would border on racist and is full of hate as well - I guess "hate" is the similarity of the two.
1173813
Hey, I got a better idea, why not burn them at the stake with all the other idiot Liberals? They can't speak their mind, what do they think this is, a Democracy? Just like with the Dixie Chicks, the 1st amendment applies only to the Cancervative Party. BTW, do you think, after we anhilate Iraq, we should build C-Camps there, you know, for the ragheads and homos in the US?