Is this the Warm War?
445811
No, I think it's the Stupid War.
113042
Do you talk about Matwees or Samurl Huntington's "clash of civilizations"?\nAs it looks it is inevitable. Just hope it will go easy on the world, because Bush looks serious about taking up a war.
881672
That is not a civil war, it's a population control experiment by the people of Iraq. It helps reduce the overcrowding in schools.
726321
if you think this war is a good thing,\n\nthen,\n\nyou've got to go to therepy, seriously!
5450
yes.\n\nThis is actually not a very new thing.  'The West' has been fighting with Islam for over a thousand years.  The only time this ever stopped was when the west was fighting Communism and Facism for 70 years in the 20th century.\n\nThe people that believe that 'all war is bad' are the people that are causing the west to sleep at the wheel on this issue.  All war is NOT bad -- World War 2 was NOT bad, that was a good war.  The Napoleonic wars against France were NOT bad wars.  The US Civil War was EXTREMELY bloody, it was also innevitable and it was by and large a necessary war.
464051
You're startin' to rile the natives...\nBut to answer your question, If they keep it up, the whole damn world will be addicted, so there won't be time for wars. \n\nGOOD JOB Y!A Team!!!!
383242
No, it's just another war.
590653
No war is not Right. Even the Mahabharat war was wrong but it happend. Also it should be noted that Pakistan is the work of the British. But the sad thing is that the problem sees no soloution in the near future. It will take only a miracle to solve this problem.
640623
really another name for Neo-Jacobian.  cold war, war mongering, hateful way of thinking.  you should search the web and learn some things..........or a encyclopedia would be wonderful.  and then a nice thing to look up as well would be "P.N.A.C." which stands for: Project for the New American Century.  it outlines a plan the calls for two hundred years of international war.  rumsfeld and ashcroft were on the original board.  its all for war with anyone who does not gives the u.s. their natural resources.  good question, your an alright redneck in my book.  take care of yourself.
723092
No.  Can't think that self-actualization came into play in that war.  Perhaps safety needs were the main focus for those that were fighting.
755856
I say it's a civil war. In my view its a religious war that has been going since the birth of Cain and Abel. We cannot solve it and will never solve it until Christ returns. Blood will be shed and peace will not come in that place. May God be with us all.
663660
I think the warm part has something to do with it....
1123313
what i think is interesting is the war.  It's been awhile since I've read the book, but "we've always been at war with Eurasia"  then it suddenly turns to "we've always been at war with Indoasia(or whatever it was called, like I said it's been awhile).\n\nany-hoot, this reminds me of the war in Afghanistan....we were at war there, then all of a sudden we were in a war in Iraq.  it was like we were always at war in Iraq.  \n\n"Afghanistan?  no, we've always been in Iraq"
683527
Blah. I wonder this myself constantly.\n\nI personally believe no good will come out of this. I was discussing this with my American History professor, and she and I agree: this war is just another Vietnam. It started as a civil war Americans had no right involving themselves with, and now it has become extremely long and an absolute waste of our time.\n\nI absolutely hate people who say "It's for their own good; I know THEY don't think so, but it is." Who are we to decide what's best for others? Just because it works well for us (SUPPOSEDLY) it is the SUPREME form of government?! We are not those people's parents, their mother, their father, to determine what is best for them. We are a Super Power, yes, but we are not in control of other human's lives. There is nothing about Americans that makes us superior to Iranians, to Russians, to Australians, to anyone. \n\nIf our economy is rising, it is because we're producing machines for war. That's the concept plus Keynesian "priming the pump" that got us out of the Great Depression. And then, of course, the economy went into a slump afterward, so there you go. \n\nPeople believe this is a moral war. All it's doing is making forgein peoples hate us more for the common American attitude of superiority and "city on a hill"ishness from the Puritanical days. It's creating tension that doesn't need to be there that will hurt us and many people in the near future. We aren't "defending democracy." We aren't trying to "free" the Iranians. It's all a load of self-interest and a fake sense of superiority. \n\nI doubt Americans have any intention of paying for this war or any of their other debts. Most large powers don't. We learned before WWII not to demand repayment such as war reparations, because those played a large part of getting us into that particular war. \n\nAlso, I heard on NPR that Bush was thinking of changing the name from the "War on Terror" to the "Long War." \n\n"Blind patriotism." My thoughts exactly. Anyone who will follow something so blindly as to refuse to see the reality that the people Bush is making into our "enemy" are humans just like us is an idiot and should be ashamed of themselves. \n\nYes, at one point in time there WERE "weapons of mass destruction." Bush Senior gave them to them because they were afraid of being invaded by their neighbors. The U.S. had and has oil interests there and needed to preserve them, and so President Bush Senior gave them those weapons. U.S.-crafted. That is factual.\n\nBut whether or not they existed when our present President went in to look for them is VERY dubious. I and many intellectuals I know, some of them conservative while I am liberal, agree with me that it was a matter of oil interests. America hasn't been an independent oil-supply for a very long time now, and we are a highly mobile society. Hence there is a problem. \n\nFrance used to respect the U.S., during JFK’s presidency in the Cuban Missile Crisis, because it was its belief that we would never invade a country without solid proof. Do you see what has happened to America? In just forty short years, considering we are already such a young country, our foreign policy has turned from a very loved president’s, JFK’s, to George W. Bush’s aggressive, half-cocked launching of human beings blinded by patriotism for oil interests.
98657
No it is not.  For example:\n\nThe Greek Wars between city states.\nThe Punic Wars\nThe American Indian Wars (most of the tribes involved had some form of democratic government)\nThe Franco American War, circa 1795\nThe Spanish-American War\nThe Anglo-Bohr War in South Africa \nThe First World War\nThe First Indio-Pakisatani war\n\nDoes that help?
277597
You know... you ask some of the best questions...\nI do not believe it will be a war between the haves and the have-nots, at least not in the context of your question.  The current war on terror is a war of ideaologies, and the fundamentalist Muslims who the western world is fighting against are not necessarily the have-nots.  OBL is a multi-millionaire, and many of the terrorist organizations (Al Quada, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Hamaas, etc...) are also very well funded through the sales of middle eastern oil.  In a sense the west is paying the wages of their enemies through their buying of middle eastern oil.  Make no mistake, the common man doing the fighting is middle to lower class.  That is true for both sides of the conflict.  But the governments and entities waging the war(s) are well off.\nAs stated, the war on terror (or the war against the capitalist west depending upon whose side your viewing from) is a war of ideaologies, just as the cold war was and as long as both sides can continue to foster said ideaologies the war will continue to rage on.
757956
and by Muslims and by Christians!!  it seems like there's a war going on. Lol\n\na cyber holy war!!