How much time would or could someone, under 18 spend in prison for aggravated assault wihtout a deadly weapon?
441544
That woud depend on the statutory law of the state where the assault took place.  Many state woould still try the pesron as an adult depending on the law and the person's age.
768708
If he has a seziure and kills someone, I'd think that would be criminally negligent homicide, something like 20 years in jail.
890428
You do not have any thing to worry about. Unless you are talking to known terrorist.\n\nBy law if they hear any thing other than terrorist they can do nothing. even if they hear a murder plot they must let it happen. If they do any thing the person that told will go to jail for 15 years.
507985
Just you asking that could nail you but good.\n\nAttempted assault in most places is good for 60 days to a year in prison.\n\nAttempted murder will get you 5-10 years in the State pen.\n\nI suggest you find some self control and an education before you get a permanent hotel room with bars and a new boyfriend.
116367
CARELESS, RECKLESS, OR NEGLIGENT USE OF FIREARMS (EXCERPT) \nAct 45 of 1952 \n\n\n752.861 Careless, reckless or negligent use of firearms; penalty. \n\nSec. 1.\n\nAny person who, because of carelessness, recklessness or negligence, but not wilfully or wantonly, shall cause or allow any firearm under his immediate control, to be discharged so as to kill or injure another person, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison, Maximum Sentence: 5 years 0 months,  and or a fine of not more than $2,000.00,  in the discretion of the court.\n\n\nHistory: 1952, Act 45, Eff. Sept. 18, 1952
362822
THERE WOULD JUST BE A FINE IMPOSED, 10 DAYS-JAIL TIME & 60 HOURS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE DEPENDING ON STATE YOU RESIDE IN, POSSIBLY; MAYBE THE FAMILY MEMBER COULD/WOULD DROP THE CHARGES & JUST A FINE; AGGRAVATED ASSAULT IS PRETTY SERIOUS THOUGH..HOPE THINGS CAN BE WORKED OUT, MAYBE THE ASSAULTER NEEDS SOME COUNSELLING.
399643
Aggravated Robbery is a Felony of the First Degree in Texas, and thus carries a punishment range of not less than five years, or more than 99 years, or life in the pen.
194710
Not as many years as you should be sentenced to for being guilty of slaughtering and assaulting the English language. Oh my gosh! "Found guilty," "manslaughter," "assault."\n\nBut I'm not winning any friends that way. Here's an answer to your question:\n\nIt depends upon the jurisdiction, whether the judge has to use mandatory minimum sentencing, whether the guilty person had a prior record, whether s/he is a juvenile. It depends upon whether the person was found guilty in a trial and the sentence was recommended by a jury, or decided strictly by the judge; or, whether the defendant took a plea bargain from the district attorney and allocuted to the crime in front of a judge; and, whether the judge followed the sentencing recommendations laid out in the plea bargain. \n\nIn some jurisdictions the charges that you have mentioned are simple and straightforward; in others, there may be degrees of seriousness of each. In New York, there is manslaughter in the "first degree" and in the "second degree." They mean different things and have different punishments associated with them.\n\nIf this person is awaiting or in the middle of the trial, the jury will possibly have some say over whether lesser-included charges can dictate the sentence. There are two ways: one is by "jury nullification," where they come up with their own charge (very rare); another is that in some jurisdictions the jury can be instructed to find a person guilty of the most serious crime that the person has committed if they believe that the prosecutor has proven guilt, but not all of the facts of the highest charge. For instance: if someone were charged with manslaughter, and was obviously guilty of involvement in the murder but had not intended to kill the victim, the jury might be able to come back with a verdict of negligent homicide.\n\nOther factors: how much time did the person spend in jail before and after the indictment? Will that be deducted from the final sentence as time-served? Is the DA trying the person for both manslaughter and aggravated assault, or is the second somehow a lesser-included charge? Will the judge run the sentences consecutively or concurrently? (The defendant might get 7 years for manslaughter and 2 for aggravated assault. If concurrent, the max is 7 years; if consecutive, the person is being sentenced to 9 years.)\n\nYour question, though, is about how many years the person would serve. Besides the variables in sentencing, there would be considerations for good behavior and decisions by the parole board. So there's no way, with the information that you've given, that anyone could tell you exactly how long the defendant you describe would have to stay in jail.
189950
No one can answer this question with certainty because of the plea bargaining process.  His sentence (if he is convicted) could range from probation to prison time.  It just depends on what plea arrangement he works out, or what a judge/jury sentences him to.
175047
It depends on the offense.  If the defendant only violated the protective order, then the days sound like it is in the range for sentencing.  If the defendant committed another offense and he/she would be subject to the penalties of the new offense.  The sentence is based on the underlying charge.\n\nThe conviction will limit the defendant in many ways including losing the right to own firearms and other weapons.
848526
My daughter was murdered in February.\n\nThe killer is in jail and there is still no date set for trial. I can't imagine that he will be found "not guilty" so haven't concerned myself much with that.\n\nI would imagine that prison is probably the safest place for him. Murdering a high school student doesn't make you a very popular person.\n\nHave you spoken with the Prosecutor about your concerns? Do you have Victim's Assistance available to you for free counseling?\n\nYou will probably find it helpful to do both of the above. They've helped me. The Prosecutor has been able to educate me about the process sufficiently so that I have a high degree of confidence that he will be found guilty and likely be sentenced to life in prison\n\nTherapy has been helpful to deal with not only the profound grief but also the incredible amount of anger.\n\nI sincerely hope that everything works out for you. Feel free to contact me if you'd like more info or just have somebody to listen.\n\nDrew Crecente, Director\nJennifer Ann's Group\nhttp://www.JenniferAnn.org
48337
I think it depends on the crime.  If it was premeditated and gruesome, then by all means yes; however, if it was accidental, and unplanned, i.e. like that boy who accidently killed that little girl by performing a wrestleing move on her, then no, but they would need some form of hospitalization.
258798
Yes and no. If he continues to waive time or he and his lawyer ask for more time to resolve pre-trial issues, it will take as long as it takes. There have been people who have been in county jail for as long as 7 years. That person was found guilty of a felony and senteced to time served. (Back story was he had a contract out on his life and knew that he would be killed in prison. So, he delayed and delayed until he had been there 7 years. Smart criminal.)\n\n\nCharles Ng, a serial murderer in CA, used his knowledge of the law to delay his murder trail 13 years!!! Pretty gruesome, but read about him and his trail here:\n\nhttp://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/ng/call_1.html
431887
In general, an aggravated version of a crime is more serious. That can be for several different reasons, and they would depend on the state.
723455
Assault\nBattery\nAssaulting an Officer of the Law\nResisting Arrest\nObstruction of Justice\nAttempted Murder (maybe)\n\nHe would spend a LONG time in jail.
901508
Really depends.  It depends upon whether he's tried as an adult or a juvenile, and it depends upon whether he pleads guilty or has a trial, and it depends upon what actually happened, and depends upon the law of your state.  \n\nAggravated arson is certainly a felony. That means prison. "Aggravated" usually means heightened penalty.\nYou have to look at the law of your state to see how the legislature has defined the penalties (it could be a "determinate" scheme, where the court sentences to a particular amount of time, or "indeterminate" scheme, where the court sentences to something like "5-15 years" with a parole board deciding when teh criminal gets out.\n\nExpulsion? I think the school could hold a hearing and expel for aggravated felony occuring on school grounds.
1118942
It really does depend on the crime and the particular youth involved.   Infancy, the legal term referring to minors under the age of 18 in most states, is considered a legal disability.   A blanket rule calling for adult treatment of all 17 year old criminals would be dangerous.  It's important to consider whether the minor offender was mature enough to have formed the intent required to commit a crime, whether he or she understood the nature and consequences of his or her act, and the nature and circumstances of the crime (was it heinous, premeditated, etc).  With nothing more, it would be impossible to say that 17 year olds in general should be held accountable as adults.