does orbitrek really work?
439146
any type of cardio would be helpful, so the orbitrek could be helpful. it's easy on the knees, so that's good. the important thing is whether you would use it on a regular basis.
947175
I have seen people recommend it,. but just the name gives me the creeps.  It sounds like one of those fake programs that actually cruds up your system.  But I haven't tried it.\n\nI stick to the tried-and true favorites, Ad-Aware and Spybot.
319538
Generally, no.\n\nBonus and/or reward point programs are marketing efforts to retain customer loyalty.\n\nThe only laws regulating consumer marketing generally fall into the full and open disclosure area of law.  Most major companies such as airlines (Frequent Flyer programs) or financial firms(Discover's Cash Back rebate or American Express Rewards) are pretty good about disclosure on how their programs work.  This isn't to say, though, that they make it easy.  Usually notifications that the program has changed is delivered with your billing statement in legal disclaimer language in a font that would require the Hubble Space Telescope to read. :-)\n\nIf you feel you have been defrauded through one of these programs, contact your state's attorney general office.  They can best advise you how to make a claim.
870918
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/buran.htlm\nhttp://www.astronautix.com/lvs/energia.htlm\nhttp://www.hightechscience.org/buran_space\nhttp://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle\nhope it will help.\nThe only working, flight-ready,and worthy space shuttle is NASA's space shuttle fleet.
189154
absolutely.  In the dead of space a vehicle such as the space shuttle could use maneuvering thrusters to completely stop it's self and remain stationary.  Taking that a bit further you can conclude that if the data is mapped properly gravitation forces from heavenly bodies could be automatically counter with the same thrusters.
1041240
they say warp drive is possible but first we must discover negative energy then form a bubble around a ship with it as space behind us expands then space in front contracts then it propels us foward through contracted space making a trip to mars significantly shorter. phasers are possible by igniting electrons which causes a chain reaction which wil burn a target with large amounts of heat maybe enough to incinerate it. want a communicator go to verizon and buy a flip phone. if you want an entertainment system like data and want songs on demand go buy an ipod. well thats about it to see more stuff like this tune into the history channel now and again
957129
Yes it does and yes it will.  In fact it took me two installs and didn't work right in between.\n\nWait until they get the bugs worked out, it's not worth it yet.  I had the beta version and it worked better than the actual.  See if you can find that.
445790
there is a design for a "starship" that IS theoretically feasible.\n\nit is known as the "Bussard RamJet" and you might look it up in the wikipedia.com ( it is also mentioned in Carl Sagan's "Cosmos".)\n\nthis ship can theoretically travel at 10 % the speed of light ( i.e 18,600 mi/sec .)  it is technically possible to build it NOW if the motivation ( and funds) existed.  \n\nif you traveled on this ship, "relativistic effects" would slow your aging in comparison with the earth.  In other words, when you return, hundreds of years may have elapsed in relation to only a few of your own.  because of this, any trip must be considered "one way" in the social sense.  \n\nto answer your question,  the technology is here but no one is trying becuase the time paradox is too real.  besides, we wouldnt know where to go anyway.  ( it would be hit or miss ).  the landing part is quite simple.... the hard part is getting there !
1141160
My answer is possibly...\n\nIt appears that someone I found on the link for the message board I attached below says it has worked for them, but there are many people talking about the real loops and hoops you have to jump through to make this really happen.  So I hope this site helps you answer your question...if not it will confuse you more...haha.  Good Luck!\n\n:-)
870426
nope, i have heard and read a few articles on this and there are no matching missle systems in the world,nothing can get past it as far as i know.
843132
trackers do work.  www.freewebs.com/spacetracker you can try it for yourself on the website there is a link.  you just login and click the link on the page and your profile will be tracked.  you can either sign up for the forum to get the instructions on where to look to see the actual tracker or just go to the page and your display name will be posted on the same forum but you dont have to sign up to see your display name posted.   only certain ones work.  you wont know if they have a tracker on their profile either.
181123
Here's an article on warp drive\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warp_drive
456856
Please have a look!\nIt works to me.
78721
NO it doesn't - if you're referring only to space - at zero gravity that is! \n\nThe initial launching rocket boosters are abandoned once you enter space, and the fuel is filled only to the suffice the requirement of the rocket launch - enough to push it into space for the rocket to thereon move autonomously.
304939
Going back to a capsule type system definately seems like a strange step.  \n\nBut as far as getting an effective system flying in a low budget enivronment, it is probably a good choice.\n\nI think seperating the cargo and crew flights is a good idea.\n\nI would like to see more alternative methods of getting man & material into space such as the high altitude drop then rocket burn of the Spaceship1, or the space elevator.
217272
Mine works.\n\nUsed it on Win  Ubuntu and Slack.\n\nI did however notice alot of crashes in 1.5, it just shutting down, so i just went back to ol Mozilla 1.7.12
727229
Check http://ask.jongo.com/qa/detail.jng?id=110 to know real situation.