Who is responsible for the bill?
438949
the school because it occured on their time and property. Hope your kids get ok.
162149
A Bill is introduced in one House or another, if it passes it goes on to the other House, where they either pass the same version or more likely their own version of the Bill.  As both houses have to pass the same version of the same legislation it goes into committee of members of both house's who try to work out a compromise bill.  This is usually where all sorts of things get added to the bill that may have nothing to do with the bill in order to get both sides to agree on the bill.  At this point it goes before both houses again to be passed, if both houses pass the same version of the same bill it goes on to the President, however if any changes have been made between the two houses it goes to committee again.  This is how many pet project's or as it is called Pork Barrel Spending is created.  It is the same thing as the President spoke of as Earmarking in his State of the Union Address.  Currently both house's of Congress are controlled by the Republican Party and all legislation must pass through both house's before it goes to the President for his approval.
581832
Both have had a Bill in them
69608
Are you asking about whose more guilty, the person who breaks into the house or the person who pays for the burgler's kit?  In modern American jurisprudential thought, both are EQUALLY liable for any damages, assuming theire is reason to believe the person 'paying' was 'reasonably aware' that the funds were going to be used illegally.
332077
Give it time.\n\nIt's all hot air and will fail to find approval. If you feel that you must get involved (and trust me, it will die on it's own anyway), just write your local senator and tell them how much you disapporve of the bill.
663108
Every state has a time limit to be responsible for bills. NC is 3 years, check on website of Attorney General.
832060
i think it is legislature but im not sure \nhope it helps
139394
this is under the law of bailment. when you are borrowing something from someone you generally owe duty of reasonable care as to that which you are borrowing.
94699
Bills such as electic, phone, credit cards, etc. need only be kept until you recieve the next bill, legally they cannot make you responsible for errors (yours or theirs) not caught within the current billing cycle. Tax records not included.
53541
well, here is the text of the bill.  good luck with that:\nhttp://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2006/PDF/SB/SB0245.1.pdf\n\nas for "in laymans terms", you have to be very wary of who is translating it into layman's terms.  different people will put entirely different spins on "what the effect will be" and i tend to not trust others' interpretations because you are at the mercy of their ethics in presenting an unbiased interpretation.\n\nhowever, having read the summary statement at the beginning of the bill, i suspect that the bone of contention is the line where it mentions "Specifies that "basic telecommunications service" does not include functionally equivalent service provided by a person that transmits communication through Internet Protocol enabled services."\n\npresumably this is an issue because cable companies are moving towards digital services and integrating cable and video distribution with internet traffic.  they will have to do this to keep up with the trends in TV viewership and the market - but i think that before this bill, since they were cable providers, they were immune from competition.\n\nstate utility monopolies are there because it would be a waste to have eight sets power lines, phone lines and water pipes running to each house for every different power, phone or water company that might exist.  however internet traffic works differently - because digital information is switched and routed by computers, it can come from anywhere and be transmitted down the same pipe - there's no need for a regulated monopoly when it comes to digital content.\n\ncable companies have been on the sweet end of this lollipop for a long time, because their technology required a monopoly for the same reason that water companies' technology did.  however, when they move to a digital/internet type of distribution system, that monopoly is no longer reasonable (to me) and the door to competition should be thrown open.\n\nso, it sounds like this bill is essentially declassifying digital cable as a "basic telecom service" which means that you'll be able to choose from multiple providers.\n\nsounds good to me!  of course, this is all based on a cursory reading of this bill.  i am by no means a specialist on indiana's telecom regulatory structure, or even a lawyer, so take my interpretation with a grain of salt.
937557
I'm assuming those facts are correct however, I would believe if I saw the whole bill (appropriation). How do you know pork-belly wasn't attached? How do you know there wasn't an attached appropriations or spending bills that give millions to disenfranchised homeless artisans that do murals of anti-christ?\n\nSure, that may sound stupid or funny but, How do you know? A single line data entry does not a story tell.
505673
The owner is responsible but their is negligence on both parts.
85189
This is the duck and run senerio.\nWHO is responsible?\nthe Govenor?\nThe mayor?\nThe State?\nThe Fed?\nTo many things happened and the RIGHT solutions DIDNT happen.\nThe FED cant come in, until the STATE asks.\nthe state didnt know or care.\nThe city GOV, didnt know who to call.\n\nThe FED is responsible for the roads, and gov facilities.\nThe state is responsible for the STATE facilities,\nThe HOMES, are not covered.  Except under insurance, and the LAND OWNER.\nThe BUSINESS's are NOT covered.  Except as they paid their INSURRANCE.\n\nIf they DUMP all of it on the FED, YOU WILL PAY FOR IT.
956993
And the question about utility bill statements is.....?
437419
In the state of Maine it is the landlords responsibility.  I would assume it is there.  Call code enforcement and document that you have called by letting your landlord know by mail or letter (make sure it is written).
102769
It is impossible to know when or even if it will be voted on, since it has not been placed on the calendar. The last thing that happened with the bill is the Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings on it.
120501
As far as I know, the FEDERAL ( not state ) government passed an energy bill in the late 1970's that REQUIRES any local co-op to purchase available surplus electric power from their customers who have generation capability.\n\nIf your local co-op is NOT doing this, they are NOT in compliance with Federal regulations...Contact your Senator...He can QUICKLY resolve the situation...And will be GLAD to do so for the publicity...