who here thinks that BUsh shouldnt be president state your reason?
445347
2008, end of an error.
1078079
Anyone who ever voted for Bush shares the responsibility for his crimes and for WW-III, which he started all by himself.\n\nAnd anyone who would even now consider another vote for him (which happily is not possible) must be either braindead or one of his criminal cronies.
1129659
Good question.  If so many people don't think he's doing a good job as president, doesn't our constitution allow us to get rid of him?  I don't think as many people disapprove of him as it may seem.  The media sure makes it seem that way though.  I think people just say they disapprove of him because it's the social norm.  I might not agree with everything Bush does, but I trust that he always does what he thinks is best for our country.  And who can blame him for that?
69121
I really didn't want another Bush in office because of Sr George Bush was about when he was in office. Unfortunately his son is in office and then 9/11 happened. Now we have our troops over seas fighting against an enemy that they have no real experience in fighting (guriella war-fare). Troops are dying everyday and we really haven't found any weapons   of mass destruction or Osoma Bin-Laden as of yet. The real reason why we are over in Iraq is to get our bid in on their black gold. Is Bush the right person for presidency? NO. But he has to finish what he started.
524754
Because they simply dont know who else to blame! Seeing that he is the President of the United States, they think EVERYTHING must be his fault!
1069452
I disagree and I am an Independent that likes Bush. I would vote for Zeb or Joe Lieberman. Even though Joe is not a Christian which does bother me he, is a great Patriot and honest man.
1152819
Sure.  We need someone to blame for the incompetence of the Bush administration.
372899
At least twice each week I read the rant of another angry American who declares that Bush is an idiot, but if they're just figuring that out now, they're throwing stones from a glass house. \nOf course he's an idiot. They needed an idiot. If the man displayed any signs of intelligence, evil actions couldn't be passed off as "failures" or "bungling." If the president were intelligent and scholarly, people would question why he's completely incompetent, but because he's an obvious buffoon, many people accept that as the reason everything's going horribly wrong. It's also a lot less distressing to believe that your government is incompetent rather than know that they're evil, and most people will cling to that comfort. \n\nThe real problem is that if people blame Bush's idiocy for our troubles, they probably also think that the solution would be to get him out of office, but if they think we'll be saved by "Hillary in '08," or any other politician, they're even slower than Bush. \n\nRegardless of who's occupying the White House, there has never been an idiot running this country. There's too much power and money at stake for an idiot to gain control of it. If the president is an idiot, he's only in the White House because someone else has firm control over him. Someone somewhere has a lot more control over the fate of this nation than our "president" does. \n\nOf course this reasoning begs the question "if this country isn't being run by an idiot, why is everything going so horribly wrong?" The answer is that it's going wrong by design. \n\nThe questioner makes the assumption that this country is being run by people who are acting in the interest of Americans, but nothing can be further from the truth. Instead of accusing Bush of doing a lousy job, or being a lousy president, please try to think in terms of Bush's "boss" being someone other than the American people, and his "job" as being to grab as much cash as he can for himself and his friends before driving this country into the ground. If you look at his presidency in that light, you can instantly see that he's doing a marvelous job, and he's the best "president" an enemy nation could ever hope to see in the White House.The fact of the matter is that America as we know it (or knew it) is being systematically destroyed, and the politicians from both political parties are making this possible. \n\nWanna Read MORE On THIS???\nSee My BLOG
842824
I think that Bush cost us (republicans) the election. I think that people were voting against bush rather than for a canidate. THAT worries me. I am one of those people that, even though I am a republican at heart, I feel regardless of party affiliation, it should be whoever's best for the job. And I don't necessarily know if those voted WERE best. I just hope those elected PROVE to the country that the voters didn't make a mistake.
282711
I think that the president should do what Bush is doing.  Be confident and make a decision, even if it is wrong, I think it is better than waffleing & watching poll #'s.
306577
I DON'T BLAME GEORGE BUSH FOR THE PROBLEMS OF THE WAR OR OUR ECONOMY.   HE HAS PROVEN OVER AND OVER HE IS NOT SMART ENOUGH TO BE THE MAN IN CHARGE.  I ALMOST FEEL SORRY FOR HIM, HE IS PATHETIC WHEN HE SPEAKS,  NO MAN THAT IGNORANT COULD BE DOING THIS.  OUR GOVERNMENT USES HIM AS A PUPPET.
299392
I personally am a Republican. Bush had (I my opinion) a good idea of sending troops into Iraq because if we didnt get in there and restore at least a little bit of order they could plot even a more disastorist event than 9/11. Although he also has his faults to. If we could elect two presidents at the same time we would be democrat/republican country. Each time having two president from two different parties. Sort of like what the Romans did and they were pretty successful. But I am just a twelve year boy explaining my opinion.
772536
Coulda, shoulda, woulda. What IS your point???\n \nI have been disgusted with many people in our country lately. It deeply saddens me how our country has so divided itself by way of rumors, party bickering, and accusations of all sorts about world affairs. It is just best to listen to President Bush very carefully and listen so well that you are not judging him as he talks. He is a strong leader with an immense global crisis, but not because of his own doing. If we had never invaded Iraq, do you really think that America would be free of hostile global politics. Do you think if we had a different, maybe Democratic president the past 4 years, that terrorists would just be hanging out in the Middle East playing cowboy and Indian in their little harmless terrorist training camps?
611111
I think anyone with reason and a little humility could do a better job.\n\nIf he was my employee he wouldn't last very long. He puts theories into action that have never been proven that cost the taxpayers trillions of dollars. We spend more on our defense budget now than all the other counties in the world combined.\n\nTo anyone that has been paying attention, that isn't an unadulterated, closed minded Bush lover, this country is heading down the wrong path. We cut education and all sorts of other budgets to fund a war that was based on lies.\n\nNow is that a reasonable thing to do?
610859
I could not vote when Bush was elected and re-elected, but if i had my way, he would have never been in office...anybody thinking what I'm thinking...?\n\nIMPEACHMENT!!!
347289
Bush is a sad case, he is so out of control that he doesn't realize it, but in his defense the lack of control is not necessarily his fault.  He has a cabinet of slimy corrupt money/power hungry friends that are influencing his decisions in a very detrimental way.
732460
Not when the choice was Bush or Kerry. I mean, come on, Kerry as president. That gives me the willies.