Who caused Parliament to pass the Factory Act of 1833?
438406
Jeremy Bentham was one of the leading social reformers of the period, and would have been influential in helping pass the Factory Act.\n\nFor more on Bentham and Utilitarianism:\nhttp://www.gober.net/victorian/reports/utilitar.html
485003
Laws from where? The US Congress, your state Congress? Britain? Australia? There are lots of places that pass lots of laws. We need more information.
107564
Consider this- the North had the factories and the ability to ship goods produced by those factories for export, the South had plantations with a lot fewer ways of shipping the goods (cotton, etc.) to the factories where the cotton, etc. was made into other things(virtually no way to export goods).
542257
In 1647, the English parliament under Oliver Cromwell made Christmas celebration illegal (considering feasting and celebration on a holy day to be immoral).   That law was repealed.\n\nThe Holy Days and Fasting Days Act of 1551, which among other things forbade the use of any kind of transportation on Christmas, has never been repealed.
303679
main imports were, cotton and tobacco may be this will help.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_England\nGood luck
965028
I will only help if I can be cited in the essay.  \n\nThere was a triangle of trade.  Manufactured goods would be sent to Africa.  From Africa, slaves were sent to the Caribbean or North America.  Then from the Caribbean or North America goods such as Rice, Sugar, Tobacco, Rum, and Cotton were shipped back to England.\nThat is what I learned in history but for a detailed explanation check out the site below:
372159
The origins of the Conservative Party can be traced to the 'Tory' faction which emerged in the later seventeenth century. This 'Tory Party' established a secure hold on government between 1783 and 1830, first under the Younger Pitt and then Lord Liverpool. However, after Liverpool's retirement in 1827 the unity of the party was destroyed when the Duke of Wellington and Robert Peel, were forced, largely as a result of events in Ireland, to concede full political emancipation to Roman Catholics. The Tory collapse opened the way for a return of the Whigs in the 1830s, and a series of measures including the Great Reform Act of 1832 changed the political scene; in the general election which followed the Act the Tories were reduced to only 180 MPs. \nIt was in the wake of these upheavals that the name 'Conservative' first began to be used, as Peel sought to rally the opponents of further reform in the mid-1830s. He was successful in drawing support back to the party and became Prime Minister after winning the election of 1841. However, his decision in 1846 to reverse course and repeal the protectionist Corn Laws outraged many of his followers, and the party split from top to bottom.
1127239
An Act to define and amend the law relating to the sale of goods\n\nWHEREAS it is expedient to define and amend the law relating to the sale of goods;\n\n\n\nIn this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject of context,-\n\n    (1) "buyer" means a person who buys or agrees to buy goods;\n\n    (2) "delivery" means voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another;\n\n    (3) goods are said to be in a "delivered state" when they are in such state that the buyer would under the contract be bound to take delivery of them;\n\n    (4) "document of title to goods" includes bill of lading dock-warrant, warehouse keeper's certificate, wharfingers' certificate, railway receipt, 4[multimodal transport document,] warrant or order for the delivery of goods and any other document used in the ordinary course of business as proof of the possession or control of goods or authorising or purporting to authorise, either by endorsement or by delivery, the possessor of the document to transfer or receive goods thereby represented;\n\n    (5) "fault" means wrongful act or default;\n\n    (6) "future goods" means goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after making of the contract of sale;\n\n    (7) "goods" means every kind of moveable property other than actionable claims and money; and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale;\n\n    (8) A person is said to be "insolvent" who has ceased to pay his debts in the ordinary course of business, or cannot pay his debts as they become due, whether he has committed an act of insolvency or not;\n\n    (9) "mercantile agent" means a mercantile agent having in the customary course of business as such agent authority either to sell goods, or to consign goods for the purposes of sale, or to buy goods, or to raise money on the security of goods;\n\n    (10) "price" means the money consideration for a sale of goods;\n\n    (11) "property" means the general property in goods, and not merely a special property;\n\n    (12) "quality of goods" includes their state or condition;\n\n    (13) "seller" means a person who sells or agrees to sell goods;\n\n    (14) "specific goods" means goods identified and agreed upon at the time a contract of sale is made; and\n\n    (15) expressions used but not defined in this Act and defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872, have the meaning assigned to them in that act.\n\n#### LINKS : -\n\nhttp://www.laws4india.com/acts/sga/sga_idx.asp\n\nhttp://www.helplinelaw.com/bareact/index.php?dsp=saleofgoods\n\nhttp://www.indialawinfo.com/bareacts/soga.html
520589
No, lots of large british buisinesses are having to make redundancies and are losing a lot of money.\n\nA lot of british car factories are making thousands of redundancies.
278589
Religiously, Puritans were prohibited from "enjoying" the fruits of their labors.  So if a Puritan business made a profit, he had to either reinvest or give to charity.  The reinvestment reinforced the "Puritan work ethic" and businesses began a 200-year trend of dependable growth.  This fed the industrial revolution and built the backbone of American Industry and Commerce.
169687
Too early for the Rennaisance. Look at the effects of the Bubonic Plague (1348-1352) on the production of food per person, specifically in Britain. This increase in "income" allowed resources to be allocated to the production of capital goods and the development of new technologies.
713307
the industrial revolution was a series of major industrial breakthroughs that began in textile industry in England in the late 1800s, then spread to europe and america. Factorys first formed, and British manufacturing increased greatly. The main good thing that came out of the industrial revolution was all of the products. the steam engine was invented, trains were first used and many other things that we take for granted today came out of the industrial revolution.
329307
Who is they? Are you referring to the Frist bill that was introduced?
562710
July 1884\n\nI hope this helps ... the link below explains more and is very informative as well.\n\n- Alan
235536
England. I'm basing this off Joseph Lee's book where he says "Developments towards a welfare state after the war owe more to English example than to indigenous impulse". So, in effect, he says we copied the system from Britain.
139888
It greatly increased cotton production in the South and cotton manufacturing in the North. The cotton gin increased slave work production, almost by fifty fold! The North was and still is the manufacturing megaplex, so the mills and textile factories were tremendously affected. Last but simply not least was slavery, as the Whites didn't expect the Blacks to sit on their rears and watch them. This had an adverse effect on most states, clearly showing in the end not all inventions are perfect.
968248
Read up. \nhttp://www.answers.com/topic/reform-act-1832\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Act_1832\nhttp://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/PR1832.htm\n\nBasically, the Tories, who served in the House of Lords, were being threatened by members of the House of Commons, which is similar to the House of Representatives in that they are elected to represent the people, because the people were no longer willing to put up with them. The Tories were politicians favoured by royal authority and the established church, and who sought to preserve the traditional political structure. So basically, the Tories were only interested in surving the wealthy.  The House of Lords is a politcal house in which wealthy, noblemen are pretty much born into. \n\nThere is much more information so read up! GOOD LUCK!