Can you freeze an explosion?
444222
an explosion is an uncontrollable reaction.  So freezing it would make it controllable.  therefore...NO
921568
Yes, every thing can and will freeze...
127517
When liquids freeze it expands...if the bottle is full with the lid closed, the drink will expand beyound the boundries of the bottle.....and explode.
1153788
I highly recommend "NOT" doing this. A loud noise suggests some "sharp" release of energy; and believe me, from past experience, there is nothing "non-dangerous" when playing with pyrotechnics of any kind. They all can remove fingers, toes, and appendages depending on size (either blowing them off, or burning them severely). Do not mess with explosives! \n  A "stink bomb" (non-explosive) can be made from a little soft cardboard (like found in some egg cartons- the grey ones) and a little sulfur. A dab of the sulfur in an indentation in a small piece of the cardboard and pinch it closed over the top. When lighting this, if a flame occurs "blow it out".  It should only smolder, and the smoke created will be like rotten eggs.  Just don't use too much, since a lot of Sulfur dioxide can be harmful.\n\nIf you simply MUST have a loud noise, blow some air into a plastic bag and pop it quickly.
1085627
Probably not until the problem of cellular damage by crystalline ice is solved. Ice crystals form inside cells and burst the cells, causing damage. While live cells like sperm can be frozen in glycerol (a thick liquid that prevents crystals from forming) it is another matter to freeze a whole body. Today, no one has frozen a whole animal and revived it from being frozen.\n\nNot only that, freezing causes massive systemic shutdowns of body systems (ie, you freeze to death) so any suspended animation method would require the ability to reanimate or to avoid death in the first place.\n\nMy guess is that suspended animation will not be by freezing but some other method.
637849
I do not think so. Fire can be described as a plasma, that is to say a mixture of high energy radicals neutral and ionic specicies. Freezing fire will require minimizing the kinetic energy of these species. Reduction in their kinetic energy will result in the destruction of the plasma or fire itself.\n\nHope this helps\n\n Note: To "freeze" something would require that it change its physical state to a "frozen" one, namely a solid. Frozen plasma gas, thus defies the definition of a plasma:\n\nPlasma (physical def.): a collection of charged particles (as in the atmospheres of stars or in a metal) containing about equal numbers of positive ions and electrons and exhibiting some properties of a gas but differing from a gas in being a good conductor of electricity and in being affected by a magnetic field
53225
in my real experience, the glass shattered everywhere during the explosions. maybe you've seen it on films? they keep the explosions in the house.
670061
Things that freeze at temps lower than about 75K.\nOxygen\nMethane\nhydogen\nhelium\netc
280004
very very dangerous, the explosion could be very very bad  also acetelyne would explode with just the tinyest spark
106530
Open it up and smash it with a hammer. If you destroy anything vital, it will stop working.\n\nThe difficult part with atomic bombs is to make them explode. Everything MUST work perfectly with perfect timing. If anything is off, it's a dud. The chances of them exploding accidentally is almost zero.\n\nAccidental launch is a different matter.
819769
Read Angels and Demons. Although the antimatter making technique is totally impractical, it just might be possible to store the stuff in a hand-grenade sized container. Magnetic suspension has already been done, although it would make a large hand grenade with current technology.\nhttp://www.levitron.com/\n\nA truly perfect vacuum really is impossible, but a near-perfect vacuum could be done. Just as long as you eliminate all the gas molecules floating around, you should be safe enough. http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae290.cfm
1115957
Not with current freezing techniques. Too much cell damage. In the future I think that a process will be possible. Will it be ethical or moral in a rapidly overpopulating world will be the ultimate question.
40400
No. However, it will make the battery last a tad longer than if you left it out at room temperature. \n\nBasically, your battery is storage for electrons. If you just leave a battery out, those electrons will try to ground themselves (leave) from the battery. The more you lose, the less enegy there is in the battery. Most smaller batteries are dry cells. The free elctrons are formed from chemical reactions within the battery itself. \n\nPutting batteries in the freezer will not re charge it, but it will slow down the chemical reactions so that not s many electrons are wasted. \n\nSUMMARY: Freezing your batteries won't recharge it, it will help them retain its charge if left un-used.
106178
Any closed container of liquid will explode if left in the freezer too long. The liqued will expand, increasing pressure on the container until it rips open spreading liqid over everything
356172
It will definitely explode, but not to this extent as you have mentioned. \n\nIf you want a more massive explosion try out a beer can or champagne bottle. Then the blast will be enough to hurt humans, but again not to your desired extent.
379374
I'm not sure however think freezing it help it not spoil so soon? If you have yahoo try typing in this information\nin your search engine.\nHave a Blessed Life
950756
I'm afraid I can't do that. It'll burn up and disintegrate before it even gets half-way down to you. :-P