is george bush legally insane?
439558
Yes but don't tell him that..he would use anything as an excuse!!
647
Nah.\n\nIsn't it normal to say you're a religious person while starting an unnecessary war that costs billions of dollars and over 2,000 American lives? And I think it's normal to favor the rich and give them nice tax breaks while cutting funding for educational programs in poor communities. And a person can't be considered insane just for letting a ban on automatic weapons run could he? Or how about pulling out an international agreement to decrease emissions? That isn't insane either.\n\nHe isn't insane... just plain wrong.
776399
Crazy...\n\n...though not in the actual insane sense.. More a random kind of craziness.
938992
No, he's an alien from outer space. He uses the alias of George W. Bush.
189090
I think Bush should be banned from any more public appearances.  He just keeps making himself look worse and worse.  For a leader of a country he sure is dorky.  He has got us into such a mess.  Lets file federal charges, and see if we can get him banned.  He should be held accountable for interrupting our lives whenever he wants. If we interrupted his, you can bet he would file charges on us.
891133
so Greenpeace has been jailed? and you claim Bush is a liar! if you are captured on the battlefield, you are an "enemy combatant", not a suspect in custody, there is a vast difference. you have the rights guaranteed (if you're in uniform) by the Geneva Convention, not Miranda, understand? if you are not in uniform, then by the laws of war, you can be summarily executed on the field of battle without trial. this is not some new thing Bush made up, either. Major Andre, the Brit who took the plans for the defense of West Point from Bendict Arnold was summarily executed when he was captured because he was out of uniform. you libs really need to learn the laws before going off half cocked accusing someone of breaking them
487654
Yeah I think there is someone crazy enough to attempt an assasination on Bush
824346
Well it sounds reasonable....but could it not be proven that the insanity influenced the defendants choice not to take meds or get help, whereas is his right mind he would have?
157133
you really are insane.
421237
I see the Bush supporters are out in full force today. George W. Bush is, and will always be an idiot. He has not done one thing since he's been in office that even hints at beng intelligent.\n\nHe's nothing more than an overpaid prostitute. He gets paid lots of money to screw the American people.\n\nI guess that makes me a john, so I want my money back !!!
716478
The Iranian equivalent to George W Bush.\n\nAn insane religious nut.
976645
Of course he isn’t!\n\nJust because you disagree with his policies does not mean that he’s “mentally unstable”. Frankly, the fact that you would suggest such a thing says a lot about the kind of person *you* are. “We have a difference of opinion, therefore I’m right, you’re wrong, and, oh by the way, you must be a right nutter for thinking differently to me!” Excuse me?\n\nThe following is an over-simplification, of course, but it illustrates my point of view. Iraq invaded Kuwait and an international coalition of forces kicked him out. Now instead of going all the way to Baghdad and removing Saddam, we left him in power and imposed sanctions so that he would never be able to build up his armed forces to a dangerous level again.\n\nThen, of course, we find that he exceeded the limits of those sanctions. So, what do we do? \n\nYou, I’m sure would simply have gone and had talks with Saddam and then return to us saying that you had guaranteed “Peace in our time”. Luckily, some of us have better memories than you (or are better educated) and we remember what happened the last time someone (Neville Chamberlain) said that. So, we decided not to follow the same course of action that last time lead to a world war that cost the lives of 50 million people, we decided that *this time* we’d learn from past mistakes and sort Saddam out *before* he became powerful enough to be a big problem.\n\nAgain, I’m quite sure that *you* would say “Oh, but it wouldn’t have happened *this* time!” Really? Well, personally, I’m not prepared to bet the lives of millions of people on the belief.\n\nRemember that Bush, and most sane people, want nothing more than the “Peace in our time” that you do. Unfortunately, there are evil people around who do not; the kind of people who fly aircraft into skyscrapers. Should we just sit around and do nothing about that?\n\nOh and Tom, can you explain exactly what your problem is with the video clip you posted a link to? It sounded like a perfectly good response to me. He said that it’s not an issue that had been raised before and therefore he would have to discuss it with his advisors before he could give a statement of national policy. That’s what happens in democracies. Or would you rather he behaved like a dictator? Would that make you happier?
653456
Check the liberals into a mental institution...
586420
Warrantless searches, phone trolling, torture, kidnapping, indefinite imprisonment without charges, denial of legal representation, you name it. It's all legal. Just ask Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. If the president says it's legal, it's legal. When we're at war, the Constitution, the Congress and civility are out the door. \n\nBush always plays the fear card, telling us he's "protecting" us from al-Qaeda as he takes us on our national plunge into fascism. He seizes power with impunity, and the Republicans in Congress are willing accomplices as they abrogate the fundamental responsibilities of their branch of the federal government to a power-crazed madman. \n\nAs America sleeps, basic rights, especially privacy, are under assault. The concentration of claimed authority in the Executive Branch -- removed from congressional authorization and outside the scope of judicial review -- is dangerous and frightening. \n\nThe Busheviks are not conservatives -- they are neo-fascists with an agenda aimed at protecting a privileged elite and using the unbridled power of an authoritarian government to enhance and protect their wealth. \n\nThey're not wearing black shirts, boot-stomping down Pennsylvania Avenue in the style of the more theatrical of their ilk. But their insidious threat is real and chilling.
691947
Again I have to ask you to seek for professional help! It is known and well established fact that fanatic Bush lovers end up in an asylum! Please seek for help! It is for your own good!!!
439123
Absolutely not.  Contrary to what Mr. Bush claims, I don't think that the Authorization for the Use of Force gave him the power to listen to conversations without evidence.  It's a constitutional right that we should be secure in our property and effects, and the government can NOT remove that right without due process (i.e. a warrant).  The day that we let him take that power, we can also say goodbye to free speech.
22937
George Bush is just one person. Alone he is not dangerous. It has potential danger status when the other branches no longer represent the ideas of the people. Yes he has executive privileges that are very dangerous if used improperly but to this point I don't think he has used any of them. He has dealt with many controversial issues that make some people happy and others upset. That just comes with the territory. As American citizens we elect or officials to best serve us and I think that he has done a good job. If you want to point fingers than you don't know how to solve the proble or how our goverment works. Just remember that we are all human and with that comes the ability to make mistakes. I think most people exaggerate his dangerousness in order to advance their personal agenda.