here is a good one. is the guilty always the acuser?
447752
It's very possible. Sometimes the guilty will deflect the issue by trying to put it on someone else first.
930873
The guilty to the street. \nJails are full of innocent people.
1167077
innocent to be locked up.  if someone has a propensity for criminal behavior, there is a chance they will meet justice eventually.
831237
I have a saying that I live by.. "He who cries the loudest is usually the guilty!"\n\nI have found this to be true!  Anytime I was accused of cheating or something to that effect (btw..i have NEVER cheated) after the fact I found out they were guilty of it.  So I live by that saying!
655967
Both the criminals and those who encourage the crime.
490834
Yes.  The question doesn't ask about the Bush Family.  Some people want to say that he shouldn't be because someone else got off.  Does this really change the fact that Ted Kennedy killed a person while driving drunk?  Maybe lots of people should be in jail for things they did, but this has nothing to do with Ted.  Ted KILLED someone and should have been punished for it.  Just because other people got off doesn't mean that a he should too.  It doesn't make any sense trying to justify a guilty man going free because other guilty men have gone free.  Does It?
1140788
This does not surprise me.  It is very frustrating.  In this world today, it seems like the criminals and murderers get away with everything and the good people end up paying one way or the other.  I know this to be true, it has happened to me and mine by a government who boasts freedom, justice and the American Way.  To bad they can not live up to these ideals in these times.  It's all in who you are and who you know.
107515
no b/c they just may be INNOCENT--the court system isnt always right.
726698
I'm certain he is guilty. What kind of innocent person would lead the cops to chase after him for a long time after he lied and told them he would turn himself in? There were no other suspects that the police could find, and guilty people are let free a lot. The problem seems to be the amendment in the Consitution that says that a person can't be tried twice (double jeopardy), even if substatial evidence amounts against that person. I have heard a lot of rumors that a murder weapon was found, but that eveidence is now usless thanks to that amendment. Rich people like him can afford the best of lawyers, and his lawyer certainly was no amateur. He helped many other famous people walk free, and your lawyer runs most of the show at a trial. He knows all of the loopholes and how to bring his client out of a hole.
569296
Surly to "speak up" for one of the "guilty" would make you guilty anyway.\nLose on more sleep on this matter.
171227
If it was, then every time someone is found not guilty in court the accuser would then be prosecuted.\n\nWould cut down on prosecutions tho'.
578085
No, I wouldn't date someone like that.  If he's always the innocent one then he doesn't know what he did wrong and chances are he will keep doing it.
526130
depends if its a misdimenor or a felony.....but most of the time no.....
1036045
just a friendly reminder to those that answered negatively to this question.\n\nnot all hackers are evil. if there were no hackers there would be no computers or internet for that matter.\n\nhave you helped develop any software lately? that is hacking.\n\nso are you saying this person is guilty until proven innocent?\n\ni have said some of these things myself. but it's time for a wake up call for all of us.
814176
He is guilty-they had proof of what he did
975226
It depends on how much money you have. I have seen far too many innocent people punished because of poor representation.  Good Luck!
679559
Yes, [a case] of victim-hood.