Carol Gilligan - What was her main theory. And how did it opposed Kohlburg?
439487
Carol Gilligan's main theory was that it was going to be just a three hour cruise.
492939
Boy did you open a can of worms!\n\nThe Kennedy assassination is one of the favorite of conspiracy theorist (notice I did not say nut cases).  The theories range from LBJ (totally assinine) to the Mafia (more belivable).  They also include Cubans (espcially with Oswalds connections), the CIA (no one ever asked why, they just say the CIA did it), to just some nutcase (it may be true, but can you prove it).\n\nThe real reason will probably never be discovered, but as long as people ask questions, that will be one that will be asked.
15533
This link here should help you\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_assassination_theories
753572
I didn't think about Colleens teacher being involved. You could be on to something there. I think they'll go through the process and trial trying to prove Dru is the one who did it but at the end they'll find something that proves it was someone else. I do think it was someone from her past though and not anyone that's been on the show for awhile. \nI do agree with you about Phyllis though. She is way to confident and too willing to make Dru look bad and apparently not considering all the horrible things she's done in the past. I normally like her but lately I've been hoping something happens to her to knock her off her high horse.
258203
In 1998, Melissa Müller, in her biography about Anne Frank, suggests a woman named Lena-Hartog van Bladeren as a possible suspect. Two years later, another writer, Carol Anne Lee, presents a new theory in her biography about Otto Frank. She believes the guilty party is Tony Ahlers, an acquaintance of Otto Frank
655212
Yes, that witch Kay Bailey Hutchinson, one of Bush's cronies, is up against Democrat Barbara Radnofsky in Texas.  Kay has voted along with Bush on EVERYTHING!!!! Every letter I have ever sent her comes back basically saying "oh, well"! I hope she loses!
738277
If Ana were the youngest, either the first two or none of the statements would be true.  If only one statement can be true, Ana is not the youngest.\n\nIf Ana was in the middle, either the last two or none of the statements would be true.  If only one statement can be true, Ana is not in the middle.\n\nBecause Ana is not the youngest or in the middle, deductive reasoning proves that Ana is oldest.\n\nKnowing Ana is oldest, we can also deduce that Carol is youngest.  If Carol was in the middle, statements 3 and 4 would both be true.  Since they both can not be true, they must both be false.  The one true statement is that Blair is one year older than Carol.
734043
Nancy is the worst thing for this Country, just as well as her communist liberal buddies.  \n\nSome of you are just in denial because your hatred for conservatives is fuming inside you and clouding your judgment.
1146392
Thats a good question. She doesn't speak at all with any authority, doesn't get the dry erase boards all nutty  and unintelligable, and really seems to be floundering.\nAll these years (I've channel surfed past Gene since the 70's),\ni wondered who was to be his replacement. She definately is going to run The Cathedral into the ground.\nSorry i dont know the answer, but I hope somebody does.\nThis will be an interesting piece of trivia.
854077
You know - I think it's interesting that he has her give her opinion and "expertise" on so many of his shows, yet I wonder what makes her qualified to be an "expert."  As far as I know she's always been a stay-at-home mom (not that there's anything wrong with that).  So what I would like to know is what her higher education is (other than living in the school of Dr. Phil) that makes it okay for her to publicize her opinion(s) on life, that will affect many people, let alone write a book!\n\nAs far as her looks, I say "whatever."  I generally choose not to speculate on people's personal appearance.  But I have noticed that she does look more "made up" the longer the show is on the air.  So that could be the result of the producers coaching her and/or telling her how she should appear.  Or, it could be a result of the millions of dollars Dr. Phil is raking in (as opposed to before he had his own show).  Either way, it doesn't really bother me because I don't have to live with  them, and the only person she really has to answer to in that regard is herself.
524253
E17. Who killed Laura Palmer?\n\nAs revealed in episode 16, Laura was killed by her father,\nLeland Palmer, under the influence of BOB. \n\nE19. Who/What is BOB?\n\nThis is perhaps the greatest mystery/question of Twin Peaks,\na source of endless debate, and an issue to which each\nviewer must attach their own interpretation and\nsignificance. \n\n[Note: BOB is spelled in all capital letters here, following\nthe convention used in "The Secret Diary of Laura Palmer"\n(see question P1).  This also helps distinguish between\nKiller BOB (as he is also referred) and Bobby Briggs.]\n\nThis much is given to us: BOB is a disembodied spirit\ncapable of taking over a human being.  After he takes over,\nhe manipulates his human host to commit acts of sex and\nviolence and 'feeds' upon the emotions this produces.  He is\nconnected in some manner with other spirits which appear in\neither or both of the Black Lodge and White Lodge.  An\nentrance to the Black Lodge (shown as the red room) is in\nGlastonbury Grove in the woods outside of Twin Peaks.  See\nquestions E39 and E40 for more on the Lodges. \n\nSome who reject supernatural explanations believe BOB may\nbe/have been a figment of Laura's or Leland's imagination (a\nmeans of psychologically dealing with the trauma of incest\nand adultery), or an alternate personality of Leland.  The\ncaustic FBI agent Albert Rosenfield suggests that BOB is\nsimply "the evil that men do".  The fact that so many TP\ncharacters experience these spirits make such\nrationalizations hard to logically support.  Events in the\nseries following Leland's death (the Windom Earle arc) and\nin FWWM also continue the supernatural themes. \n\nIn a question and answer session, Mark Frost indicated that\nthe idea for BOB originated in American Indian mythology and\nthat he was a local evil spirit whose presence in the Twin\nPeaks area dates back to ancient times.  See also "The List\nof 7", Mark Frost's novel (see question M5), which deals\nwith evil beings (both real and supernatural), the "dweller\non the threshold", and the teachings of Helena Blavatsky,\nthe founder of Theosophy and originator of the idea of the\n"white lodge". \n\nIt further appears that BOB is a 'servant' or agent\n(familiar) of other Lodge spirits.  The events in FWWM imply\nthat at times he is out of control and acting on his own\nrather than for the Lodge. \n\nMike [episode 13]: "Do you understand the parasite?  It\nattaches itself to a life form and feeds.  Eh.  BOB requires\na human host.  He feeds on fear ...  and the pleasures.\nThey are his children.  I am similar to BOB.  We once were\npartners."\n\nMike also says BOB was his 'familiar' (not vice/versa as has\nbeen erroneously reported):\n\n     Cooper: You spoke to me in my dream ... about BOB.\n     Mike: Mmm.  He ... was ... my familiar.\n\nIn witchcraft, a familiar is a slave spirit that the\nsorcerer uses to help him/her.  In some traditions the\nfamiliar is a demon that may appear in the form of an\nanimal.  In Malaya, owls and badgers are popular familiars\nwhile the cat is commonly associated with witches in popular\nUS culture.
690086
this question made me so curious i had to look it up...\n\nThe last episode of the show, "Gilligan The Goddess" (prod. no. 1098-670417), aired on April 17, 1967, ended with the castaways never succeeding in leaving the island. Under a wave of pressure to reverse the threatened cancellation of Gunsmoke, which aired late on Saturday nights, CBS cancelled Gilligan's Island to open up early air time on Monday evenings, despite the sitcom's solid ratings.
1037748
I love when Ann Coulter says things like this about the widows of the 9/11 attacks:\n\n“These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9-11 was an attack on our nation and acted like as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently, denouncing Bush was part of the closure process.”\n\nA good word to describe her starts with a C and rhymes with HUNT.\n\nI agree with Jim Darwin's statement as well.
846829
Carol Ann was played by French-born actress Sophie Binoche. She currently does not have a fan club but there may be one in the future. She has been in a couple of commercials so far but will soon be making the jump to television shows.
412896
Janet had an identical twin sister whom she was responsible for murdering. After this murder, Janet pretended to be her sister and was impregnated by her sister's husband. He couldn't tell them apart. Anyway, she had a daughter whom she named Amanda. She treated this daughter as though she was God's gift to the world. Janet was the "nut case" that was known as "Janet from another planet." We all loved to hate her. She was insane from what etiology I don't know. Then through a strange twist, Trevor, the sister's husband, fell in love with Janet. She married her sister's husband, Trevor aka Uncle Pork Chop, and all seemed well. Now, they have brought Janet back and she is still insane. This time she is a total wreck. The All My Children people have hired a new woman to play "Janet." That took the entire magic out of the MAD CHARACTER. The last time I saw her, she was taken from jail and being shuttled to the nearest asylum because she supposedly killed Trevor. I don't know who is writing these soaps nowadays, but this whole thing is outrageous. Hope this helps. God Bless.
1166011
Those who say she is right on the mark are just as cruel and heartless, perhaps even godless, as she is.\nA sample of her heartfelt, truthful book: (so very sarcastically said)\nIn "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," the uncompromisingly right-wing Coulter writes the Jersey Girls have no right to criticize President Bush or any of the failures that led to the terror attacks.\n"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis," Coulter writes. \n"And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy. . .\n"These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."\n\nThis is an outright attack. Pose for Playboy? C'mon! Even Bill O'Reily was surprised.
658371
Yes, I think she still pulled off a suckas$ interview and I think she is a joke like her Dad. She may be gay but she isn't gonna admit that the country is messed up because of the current administration . She might get spanked . She just came on to side track us for the whole gang of em ! I could see it in her dishonest eyes .That's my opinion whether anyone likes it or not , she is a hypocrite too. I think she was promoting her book cause even Dave was having a hard time asking questions cause all she would say is read the book. Just like em to want more money from us!