Chaplin - Keyton - Lloyd or Someone else ?
448312
Of course Chaplin....hilarious man.
187643
Mark Twain...  anyone from the South would probably be able to answer that question.\n\nOh, and I don't really think anyone believes the points thing...  :)
995594
Garth Crooks (methinks but I'll stand corrected!)\n\nBoycott below is correct: http://www.le.ac.uk/so/css/resources/factsheets/fs4.html
518625
Jules Rimet \nnaturally
721104
The chaplin is bound by privilege.  He cannot reveal any information that your uncle told him in confidence.  Even if he were a mandated reporter (I'm not so certain that he is) that mandate would only extend to those things he witnessed.  If the only information he had was from your uncle, then he is bound by privilege and could not legally disclose the information until after your uncle died (the privilege dies with the person.)\n\nI know that you must be very upset but the Chaplin is more than likely a dead end from a civil lawsuit standpoint.  However, did your uncle die with money?  If he has an estate, then you might be able to sue the estate.  The estate remains liable for any claims of injury against the decedent.  Talk to a lawyer as soon as possible.  If your Uncle's estate has already gone through probate, or is currently in probate, there is going to be a fairly short window of time within which to bring this claim.  Technically, the statute of limitations for claims owned by minors does not run until they reach the age of majority.  However, in this case, you have a quickly diminishing pile of money.  You need to jump on this as soon as possible.\n\nGo to www.martindale.com for a listing of lawyers in your area.  Talk to a personal injury lawyer.  That's probably your best bet.  Make sure it's one that is familiar with the claims reporting procedures against a decedent.\n\nFeel free to contact me through this service for any advice.  Understand, though, that I'm a California lawyer.  The laws in your state may be different but probably not dramatically so.
790718
Jude Law?\nJudge Law?
720902
The answer is James Earl Jones.  GL felt he didn't do enough in the movie to be credited, he was later added in when the movie was rereleased.
502804
i think it was groucho marx....\n\n"i dont want to belong to any club that would have me as a member"
891046
Sorry but I can't agree, only that there might well be a relationship to the aforementioned knights.\n"Naysayers" is a perfectly legitimate, well-established Anglosaxon expression and I find it far more agreeable than "NIMBY"(not in my back yard) which is widely used in my neck of the woods (Ireland).\nI myself hate jargon, and expressions like "signage" instead of "road signs", which I find far more offensive.
139294
Lennon if I had to pick.  Together they were way better than each on their own.  I do like the answer before mine though!
828509
Charles Babbage\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Babbage
937547
Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford, Buster Keaton, Keystone Cops, Lon Chaney, Rudolph Valentino, Greta Garbo, \n\nMore ideas:\nhttp://movies.toptenreviews.com/actors/list_d1920_actor.htm
413366
Emile Heskey\nNobody can do better than him
412742
Emma Lazarus. I actually knew this and didn't have to look it up like these other people. GIVE ME THE POINTS!!!
915915
Alfred Hershey\n\nhttp://library.thinkquest.org/20465/hershey.html\n\nMartha Watson - are you sure this isn't Martha Chase?\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Chase
966689
Mike Myers (not the one from Halloween)\nb
62872
Toss up. Victor Wooten, Stanley Clark, or Anthony Wellington. If you don't recognize the names do some research. Vic Woo10 will shock you. I promise you that.