was the twin towers deliberately blown up?
438373
NO IT WAS A COMPLETE ACCIDENT. \nTHEY WERE HEADING TO YOUR HOUSE AND GOT LOST.\nA*****Le.
939118
It doesn't sound like he's referring specifically at 9/11 at all. K.S. Mohammed described how terror operatives are instructed to blow up a building to maximize casualties. What makes you think he's talking about -those- buildings and -those- operatives?\n\nI'm totally anti-Bush, but I'm not seeing anything incriminating or suspicious here.
966498
i hope so. i believe it was an inside job. just way to many coincidences.NORAD standing down on that particular day  for first time in 35 yrs. Marvin bush company in charge of WTC security,he forgot to start renegotiating a new contract,old contract happened to end  on 9-11. why did they have to 'pull' building 7 ?  how could they not find both black boxes that are designed to survive crashes yet find the hijackers unburned passport on the street ? etc.
1151741
It's questionable. It seems it was hit with some sort of missile. The story is supposedly that an airplane hit it, but the resulting hole is too small and there is no evidence of plane. The government says the explosion was so hot it burned the evidence, but how come the bodies and other things around weren't burned? It's one of the many questionable topics of 9/11 (like how the twin towers free-fell to the earth??) that are explored in the video below.
812736
It was Osame Bin Laden as I've heard.\n\nBut what I don't understand is... ten minutes before the plane crashes to the towers, all the security shuts down. Meaning security guards, police, everything in the building just stops. And on that day the Jews didn't go to work at all. Then, right whent the first tower gets hit, they don't evacuate the second building. They let nobody out and said for all the employees to go back to work. Now tell me, shouldn't the entire area of the wtc get evacuated? Why did these coincidences happen? I have no clue, but there can be a catch here. That's why there's rumors that the US let this happen, because of these situations. I personally am still trying the research and add things up. There has to be another logical reason. And I'm not lying when I said those things. There's probably plenty of more coincedences around too.
388006
Yes  I Know The Facts\nLarry Silverstein Purchased The WTC Within A Year Of The Attacks And 6 Months B4 The Attacks(9/11), He Insured The WTC Complex For A RECORD 7 BILLION $$(With A Clause In The Policy SPECIFICALLY Covering A TERRORIST ATTACK)\n\nWell.. Mr. Silverstein Recently Purchased The Sears Tower And A Short Time Ago, Insured It For ANOTHER RECORD(UnDisclosed)Amount....\n\nThe SECURITY For WTC Was Provided By (Get This) MARVIN BUSH\nA Brother To George W And Jeb(Which May Explain How The FOLLOWING May Have Occurred)\n\nIt Is Being Investigated That The Buildings Were RIGGED For CONTROLLED FALL( Which Would Have Taken MONTHS)\nIncluding Building #7 (Which Was NOT HIT BY A PLANE And Had Minimal Fire Damage)\nIt Has Been Stated By Structural Engineers(Independant Of The Hokey Investigation By The Bush Crime Family)That It WAS NOT POSSIBLE That WTC 1 and 2 COLLAPSED From The Impact Of The Planes That Hit Them\nThe REASON BLDG 7 Was Destroyed Was To Conceal The EVIDENCE That The Buildings Were Dropped From A Control Bunker In The Basement(Where The Technicians "Ignited The Fuses" So To Speak)\nIt Is VERY Difficult To PROVE As The EVIDENCE Of These Crimes ( THE DEBRIS FROM THE COLLAPSES)Were HURRIED AWAY TO CHINA For RECYCLING After The Disaster\nThe So Called TERRORISTS That Were SUPPOSEDLY Flying Those Planes (Mohammed Atta And His 19 Friends) Well..16 Of The 19 Are In Fact Proven ALIVE With The Other 3 UnAccounted For ,But Presumed ALIVE\nIt Has Been Speculated That The 2 Planes Tht Hit The Towers Were Remotely Operated By The Military With NOONE Aboard\nFlight 93 (The One That "CRASHED" In PA) Is In Fact STILL In Service\nAnd At This Time , There Is NO EVIDENCE That A Plane Crashed Into The Pentagon, Although Something(A US Tomahawk Missile???) Did Fly Into And Destroy A Portion Of It\n\nWhat Ive Told You Is In EVIDENCE In A Theory Behind The Trade Center Attack Being An INSIDE JOB ORCHESTRATED By The BUSH Crime Family , And BLAMED On TERRORISTS So That Bush Could ILLEGALLY Go To War(Without The Approval Of Congress)\n\nFor MORE On This See: Alex Jones At Ground Zero\n\nhttp://martiallaw911.info/video.htm...\n\nSee Also: Loose Change 2nd Edition (Google It)\n\nIMPEACH BUSH NOW\n\nhttp://www.world-action.co.uk/explosives.html\n\nhttp://www.commondreams.org/views03/0204-06.htm\n\nhttp://www.realestatejournal.com/propertyreport/newsandtrends/20040312-starkman.html\n\nhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/200306charliesheen.htm\n\nhttp://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/collapse%20update/index.htm\n\nhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2005/070805alternativemedia.htm\n\nhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm\n\nhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/160605governmentcomplicit.htm\n\nhttp://martiallaw911.info/video.htm
321685
I think the WTC was planned by him as an attempt to blame someone and therefore have an excuse to go to war just to take the oil.....it was never about weapons of mass destruction.  As far as the Illuminati....I thought good ol BUSH was reptillian....how do you kill a reptile?
224354
According to Wikipedia, they were not. \nTwo World Trade Center, the South Tower (tower 2) of the World Trade Center in New York City, was completed in 1973 at a height of 415 m (1362 feet). It was destroyed along with the North Tower in the September 11, 2001 attacks. At the top of this tower was a popular tourist observation deck and a disused helipad.\n\nThe North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City was completed in 1972 at a height of 417 m (1368 feet), distinguishable from the south tower (Two World Trade Center) by the huge antenna on the roof. Its address was "One World Trade Center". It was destroyed, together with the south tower, in the September 11, 2001 attacks.
950996
I truly appreciate this question. \n\nTo all those who give the token thumbs down to a question like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks. \n\nInterestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, crashed 4 planes without any chance of prevention. \n\nThe following is irrefutable: \n\nFact: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI website. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care about him. \n\nFact: There are hundreds of televised claims from that day that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers.  These include firefighters, police, newsreporters, and civilians. \n\nFact: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symetrically in free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collpase as demolitions. Fire does not have the energy to do this.  \n\nFact: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of forensics. \n\nFact: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence. \n\nFact: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Penn. NORAD's has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. They also changed their story several times. \n\nFact: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families. \n\nFact: No one has been fired for 9/11. \n\nFact: The spike in put options on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines were never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates someone knew. Why not check out this lead? \n\nFact: The August 6, 2001 Public Daily Briefing Memo was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and the airline workers  have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?\n\nThe bottom line - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. Th
334850
There are 2 sides:\n\n(1) Its base was weak and it fell when disturbed by the collapse of the other buildings.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center\n\n(2) Private and illegal government information was in the building.  And though, the building endured minimal damage, the government decided it would be better to demolish it.\nhttp://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html\n\nNeither has been proven.
358424
Honestly, those who know arent telling. There was no wreckage to indicate it was a 757, the damage of the building was inconsistant with that of a 757, and the manuvering required was well beyond the capabilities of a large commercial airliner flown by a novice pilot who prior had only flown small planes. Those who report it also report outragous claims like it flew right over them, no more than twenty-five feet, when in reality they would've been blown off the highway. Those who report seeing larger aircraft were likely influenced by reports on the attacks in New York.
403674
Neither destiny nor coincidence: it's a hoax.\nNone of the planes involved in the 9/11 attacks had the flight number "Q33 NY". The flight numbers of the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers were in fact "11" and "175". Find more details at the link below.
13988
Come on, anybody that really knows the facts know that the goverment had something to do with the towers! Maybe not bringing them down but maybe allowing them to be hit! DO YOU REALLY TRUST BUSH AND CREW AFTER ALL THEY ARE BEING CAUGHT DOING LATELY?
347447
Yes, the buildings were insured for an unheard off amount a month before the event and there were numerous other things that point towards this type of theory bin laden and the bush family have had business deals in the past as well as the other players within the New World Order and other secret societies, The rest of the world are just pawns in a game of a chosen few. If a leader of a country denies what is expected of them, they are ejected in one form or another.\nI try not to read too much into it because there is nothing I can do nor anyone else\n\nI also have to add that clinton is in on it as well, from the same group.\n\nDo you really think that it was a matter of fate that the buildings fell like that of a controlled implosion.\n\nI also found it interesting that chaney was hidden away while bush was talking through a blow horn at ground zero
220089
There is much lecture in internet about this issue. Here are two sites that show some conclusions.\n\n"Ineffective fireproofing and a shortage of staircases were the main reasons for the collapse of the World Trade Center, according to a report released Tuesday and led by Dr. Shyam Sunder, Acting Deputy Director of the Building and Fire Research Laboratory (BFRL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)."\nhttp://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=040805021055\n\nAccording to an analysis by a leading fire-safety expert, had the fire-proofing insulation on the towers' steel structures been thicker, the towers would have survived longer and might even have remained standing after they were hit by the hijacked planes.\nhttp://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3354
1161949
In a cascading gravity-driven collapse (the "pancake theory"), each floor of the building should have offered at least a modicum of resistance before giving way, with the inertia of the increasing debris forcing itself through less and less resistance as the towers fell.\n\nThe WTC buildings falling at free-fall speed can only be explained by a lack of resistance in any intervening floors all the way to the foundation, meaning complete simultaneous (or rapidly sequential) instant failure of most support and core columns.  Before and after 9/11, this has only been achieved in a controlled demolition environment.\n\nTesting of metal samples of the core columns with supporting evidence of molten metal found at the site 3 weeks AFTER 9/11 have shown large quantities of thermate by-products, an acid-like cutting agent where a very small amount can be used to cut cleanly through metal.  This analysis has been conducted using WTC steel samples provided for WTC memorials at 3 separate universities and is quite conclusive, moreso than DNA evidence.\n\nWith the scientific evidence clearly stacked on the side of "controlled demolition", the greatest obstacle to any 9/11 Truth movement is the psychological factor.  Most people just don't understand science and are quite afraid of it, easily able to dismiss it when any fast-talking pundit counters with a senseless 15-second sound bite.  Most Americans have been thoroughly conditioned to this "hard science is just another opinion" mentality that is making us a joke in the rest of the world, and thoroughly helping our business competitors in the world to import our jobs.
1027720
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you.  The burning fuel INSIDE the WTC generated enough oven-type temperature to weaken the steel of the building (not high enough to melt it, granted).  The rest was gravity and the inherent design of the buildings (which, BTW, were designed to pancake exactly as they did, albeit far in the future when their natural demolition time came).  The fact that temperatures over 1500 degrees were registering in the pile afterward is the same closed-oven concept- the pile kept the heat in much longer than if it was exposed to the air.