What is USMORS and is it really a DoD think tank?  Who is Charles Burgess who is connected with it?
452006
The mission of the United States Military Operations Research Society is to enhance and expand the quality, availability, and usefulness of military operations research in developing, analyzing, and validating new revolutionary warfighting concepts by probing potential warfare concepts for the 21st century. \nThrough a  innovative process we provide for rapid turnaround of ideas and fully developed operational  concepts in a  dynamic manner that contributes directly to major US Dept of Defense programs and operational commands.\n\nABOUT US\nUSMORS is an independent, all volunteer, think-tank. Originally setup within a few days after the tragic events of Sept 11, 2001. (The USMORS is neither owned nor operated by any agency of the US Government.)\nOur Mission.... To enhance and expand the quality, availability, and usefulness of military operations research in developing, analyzing, and validating new revolutionary warfighting concepts ...more>\n\nOur Profile... as an independent, all volunteer group   (of present and former members of the US Armed Forces), USMORS is the ideal clearinghouse for providing the most accurate analysis and solutions to the entire US Defense community...more>\n\nOur Focus... Changing world conditions and US force levels, structure, and capability demand improvement in the ability to react globally...more>
798198
an advisor in one of these governmental "think tanks" that just dream up stupid ideas.
667956
All I have to say is watch the video...\n\nSeems pretty convincing to me...but it leaves alot of open questions still...\n\nhttp://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main
451199
I've heard of him.  I also heard a guy who thought robot aliens were running the NBA and IRS.\n\nPeople put out some interesting ideas, it'd be hilarious if it were true, but could you imagine how many people would have to keep their mouths shut so that no one ever found out?  Too d*mn many.
612234
No.\n\nThey are a coalition of anti-military groups.  You should ignore them as their advice as their advice is not intended to actually help you.  (They are pushing a political agenda.)
430797
"djstud" 69 and "old cutlass" are idiots. \n\nHere is a link to some grant programs that you might want to look into.\n\nhttp://12.46.245.173/pls/portal30/SYSTEM.FIND_GRANT_PROGRAM_TXT.SHOW?p_arg_names=func_cat_cd&p_arg_values=BK
113032
The coalition consists of 200,000 troops from America. 15,00 from England, 5,000 from Australia now Spain and Mayasia and others have pulled out. This word only came up since the UN wanted to wait and GWBush didn't. It really is just the US's war. \nIt is controversial, but Michael Moore's Ferinte 911 is a documentary and makes good points. Much better than the TV news coverage. Try renting it.
867446
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/world_tzones.html\nhttp://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/tzone-post.sh\n\nhttp://www.ams.usda.gov/search/gmt.htm\n\nThe first two are related.\nGoodluck
42392
I don't know - you tell us.\n\nOn second thought, don't.  That belongs in the Too Much Information file.
727986
Look up Rumsfeld and Nutrasweet. He's part of that public health menace/scandal...\n\nhttp://www.mercola.com/blog/2004/dec/10/rumsfeld_nutrasweet_folleys_now_hurt_us_troops\n\nhttp://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/05/07/aspartame_gate_when_donald_rumsfeld_was_ceo_of_searle.htm
541236
Yes, I read about it.\n\nHere's the Navy's official version:\nhttp://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq21-1.htm
112426
Who was Henry Kissinger?  (see disclaimer below)\n\n\nAnswerer holds no responsibility to the accuracy, nor is liable in anyway shape or form to the conduct of the reader of the aforementioned answer, or suggests it be acted upon at any time no matter how true or sarcastic the answer may seem.
88628
They are among the archetects for our current debacle/fiasco in Iraq and well as the power grab being done by the executive branch - supposedly justified by this " forever " war on terra.  No, Torture, arrest with out due process, domestic spying .... No. I can NOT trust them.  They operate under WAY too much secrecy to be trusted.
1083780
Finally, Phyllis Schlafly gets her scholarly due. While historians have focused on the periphery of politics -- dwelling into ever narrow corners and cracks of the American Left -- Phyllis Schlafly has had no honest assessment. Plenty of dishonest, superficial assessment based on hand-me-down "that terrible woman" stories, but little more. (...). \n\nProfessor Critchlow is the dean of U.S. policy historians and he has taken a brave step tackling a figure so unpopular among academics. Then again, I am reminded of that member of the chattering classes who said, "I can't believe Nixon won , I don't know a single person who voted for him!" Critchlow batters that academic insularity to explain how and why Schlafly's message spawned "grassroots conservatism." Let's hope some who would rather not hear, do listen. \n\nThe alternative offered by Critchlow's study is, to take a quote from one of her best-selling titles, \n\n"A Choice, Not an Echo" of the silly things constantly said \nabout her and other movement conservatives. \n\nWake up historians (left or right), you have nothing to lose but your ignorance! \n\nSee the site below for much more info.
615216
Do you know i have often wondered that myself. \nWe must be on the same wave-length. \nFor i was going to ask the very same Question. \nThe Impression one gets, by looking over some of the peoples Questions, on this site would tend to make one believe that there was. \nAnd in this day and age. \nWhy not who is to know any different. \nI know for sure that there is an Anti-Military Propagandist on the Site.
662935
Was Maj Laird your government>  \n\nGet off it - \nGo to the VA and get help for PTSD (If you were really there)\n\nAnd stop wasting our time with stupid questions.  \n\nBTW - Can you tell me where the United States Military Training Facility is located for dog handlers ----- DIDNT THINK SO\n\nAirman Skippy
1130038
This is a totally loaded Q for me- so I'm gonna tell yoou some of what I know so that my opinion will be understood. * What I'm going to write could be a bit outdated, could be memory problems (mine) but most of it will be very accurate. I did quote the CG, the rest i have read about in books- papers... over many yrs.\n\nPerhaps I should do some fact checking re: the investors- but I’ll leave that up to you, the reader. And please check out the United Defense's agenda.  I think-not sure that the CG- still  has 50+% of the UD, ball-park they have sold- let’s say about  12 million shares. \n\nHere’s are just a few names you would know that work for the CG-\nGeorge Bush father of bu$h, and so does a huge bunch of retired generals and Cabinet secretaries, like- former Secretary of State James A. Baker III. former Defense Secretary Frank C. Carlucci, whose good friend happens to be  Donald Rumsfeld, \nOkay- when bu$h started this “war on terrorism” ,Carlyle  jumped on the chance for big bucks- they know exactly how. dirty bastards. \n\nThey made earned $200 plus million in a month- ONE month, sold shares in, the Army's fifth-largest contractor UDI. The sale got the big bucks on better congressional backing for HUGE defense spending. ONE of theses ???? -- United Defense's base weapon programs. YES WEAPON PROGRAMS. \n\nHere’s the deal- presently. When the bu$h’s admin’s planned the 2002 defense budget, the document was in Congress in June 2001, this included an 11% UP in defense spending, with complete funding for the Crusader. The Carlyle Group grabbed its first payment (dividends)  from United Defense in  mid Aug.: $280 PLUS million. Can you imagine the greed/ uplifted gross feeling they had by this news, you know, prospects for the company. ~~~~Almost exactly a month later- two airliners slammed into the World Trade Center towers, and another hit the Pentagon. ~~~~SO, bu$h demanded, tricked the world into this so called- war on terrorism, DI stocks were  hot as fire! So,  five weeks later, the CG took United Defense Industries public. \n \nCG Quote- "We have an obligation to try to achieve the best returns for our investors." \n￼They certainly did in a huge way. \n\nI’ve got allot to say about this but that’s enough. They knew- they all  freakin’ knew and  have cashed in mega, mega. They are not only war profiteers but the dates- look it up- all add up to they knew when and how this cash was going to roll in. They were prepared months before “ Sept. 11th”\nWhat do I think about them? They are greedy bastards that take advantage of horrible situations- the group has a cush, cush job- feet up on a desk and mange all that money. And NOT just the U.S.A.'s $- other countries as well. Steal, Cheat, pounce when it's "the right time" - \nMy Answer \nat this point, is: The CG- Invested in this "War" \nThey made/make huge profits from government and conflict how easy to sit back and manage government investments. I’d boycott any investor- Hell, i boycott the US government these days and man are the two partners in HUGE crime. They should be in Prison after being judged in another country, because it would never happen here. \n\nThere’s much more-about this corrupt group.