Which 2000 cantidate ordered a recount of votes?
446386
Sorry, 'Speed Goddess', but Bush NEVER asked for any recounts.  Why would he?   Through the six week struggle after election day, Bush never once fell behind Al Gore in the count.   There was one statewide recount that took place \nIMMEDIATELY, because Florida state law requires it when elections are that close.  But thereafter, EVERY attempt to gain new recounts was initiated by the Gore campaing  --in areas selected NOT for evidence of fraud or significant error, but because they were heaveily DEMOCRATIC areas, under the control of local Democratic election officials, the best place to somehow 'come up with' additional votes.  (Gore needed more votes, of course -- though he ALSO made efforts to TOSS OUT votes that might go heavily for Bush, esp. military absentee ballots, and an area in the state where there had been a minor complaint about how APPLICATIONS for ballots [NOT the ballots!] had been processed.)\n\n(Also, Jeb Bush had nothing to do with these battles -- right after the election, in order to avoid even the appearance of undue influence, he stepped back from it all.     Yes, some have accused him of doing "something" to affect the count, but they can't say what!  and have never provided any evidence to back up their charges.)
802699
There really wasn't a pattern before 2000. Sometimes red would be democrat, sometimes republican. Sometimes the colors would mean different things on different networks in the same election.\n\nWhat happened is this: in 2000, all networks used the same color scheme. Now, the "red/blue" thing wouldn't have entered the public consciousness like it did if it wasn't for the recount madness.\n\nSee, usually an electoral map is up for, at most, a day. The maps are useless before election day, and by the day after, everyone knows who won.\n\nBut because it took weeks to resolve the election, those maps were on the front page of the newspaper, on the TV newscast, on websites every single day. That created a connection in the public's mind -- red=republican, blue=democrat.
36548
the 2000 election was stolen in Florida.  that's the short answer.\n\nthe long answer is because our electoral system is out dated, the campaign finance laws are easily broken, and the polticial system is largly corrupt.  Just like Bushie.
882996
You should have received a sample ballot by now which informs you where your polling place and other misc. information.  Unfortunately, your copy may have been lost or misdirected, you may wish to call 1-800-345-VOTE for assistance.
67260
245,000 votes went unaccounted for in 2000 when he won. All votes from southern florida *a heavy democratic area** Al Gore lost by 879 votes. You do the math. THE GUY CHEATED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! now he's taking us all down with him... gwb blows
997182
6-/7/2000\nFlorida won 6-2
377222
Let's assume you are talking about Richland County Common Pleas Court.  If so, if you know one of the parties' names, you can search with the tool below.  Remember, if you like this answer, vote for it!
979432
Oh please don't go there!!! If you research this 2000 election BUSH NEVER WON!!!!!  GORE WON AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT IT WAS PROVEN!!! LOOK IT UP!! That was a sad day in our history we looked like morons to the other countries. That was such a screw up and there should have been a recall and a re-election because the Republicans tampered with everything. Makes me sick to even think about that election!!
968801
He conceded!  \n\nDidn't have a small enough margin to call for a recount. And Allen is due to concede, as well, so it's officially a Democratic majority in the Senate!
814200
There is one thing for  sure. There should always be a paper vote. There is no way to verify results without one.  Do not use a ballot with chads, just a plain piece of paper. with a hole punched in it. That eliminates the BS we all suffered during the 2000 election. Next, the ballots should be counted right there,  With representatives from both parties present. Not allowed by law to be moved. And finally, All voters must present a voter I.D. That would resolve most voter fraud.
843803
"google it" is a worthless answer.\n\n1988 is back in the days before Voter News Service.  That was even before Voter Research and Surveys were conducting the exit polls.  1988 was when everyone would do their own thing.  So you've got many exit polls.  But enough about the history lesson.  The answer is http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elect_2004/past_national.html
922293
Do you know something we don't?  Last I heard the Democrats were winning both.  And recounts are mandated by law in close elections.
550522
No one.\nThe organization was essentially defunct on a statewide basis by 2000.[1]
133073
Legally Clinton.  He lost his law licence because of purgery charges
344920
The Senate vote was:\nFriday - February 12, 1999\nThe United States Senate voted to acquit President Clinton on both Articles of Impeachment as follows:\n\nArticle I - Perjury\n55 Not Guilty - 45 Guilty\n\nArticle II - Obstruction of Justice\n50 Guilty - 50 Not Guilty\n\nThe House vote was:\n\nArticle I - Passed\nCharge: Perjury before a Federal Grand Jury\nYeas: 228 - 223 Republicans, 5 Democrats\nNays: 206 - 5 Republicans, 200 Democrats, 1 Independent*\nNot Voting: 1 - 1 Democrat \n\nArticle II - Failed \nCharge: Perjury in depositions before a Federal judge\nYeas: 205 - 200 Republicans, 5 Democrats\nNays: 229 - 28 Republicans, 200 Democrats, 1 Independent*\nNot Voting: 1 - 1 Democrat
920260
2000 i think thats when it was published anyway
751074
This is exactly why Floridians demanded the recount be out in the open for public scrutiny.  Perhaps that should be the norm for all elections.