names of non-disclosure states?
454168
Non-disclosure of what? Commissions? Property defects? Title defects? Zoning issues? Lead paint? Asbestos? Hazardous substances in the house or ground? Buried oil tanks? Legal fees? Marital state? Suicides or death in the house? Criminal activity in the area? Quality of the schools? Etc., etc., etc.
499951
You can get the list here:\nhttp://www.dc.state.fl.us/absconder/search.asp\n\nHope this helps!
357682
A government job will require her to provide a copy of her DD214, so non disclosure is not an option in that case.\n\nI am in HR with a government agency and when we receive an applicant that has this type of discharge we ask that applicant to submit a written explanation of the events that led to the discharge. Generally if the explanation appears to be honest and the person seems to have learned from the mistakes made, the application goes through. This also depends on the severity of the events of course. \n\nBeware of lying... the DD214 should have a chapter code on the bottom and most government employers know the meaning of each chapter. If the statement doesn't coincide with the chapter, you can forget it. \n\nIn my experience the only discharge that will absolutely prevent you from government employment is a Dishonorable.
650266
you can't\nthe state you live in won't issue one without the full information on it...
901616
Data Protection Act\nFreedom of Information Act\n\nSex Discrimination Act\nAge Discrimination Act\n\nEuropean Convention on Human Rights\nGeneva Convention
232378
Wow, tough question!!!!  \n\nPacifiCorp will probably not give that info to you and the reservation will most definately not give that info up.  My rez has a similar agreement with another hugh company,  you could try to contact each "company" but most have the "confidentially" clause not to release info on those types of settlements.
298796
Georgia http://www.dcor.state.ga.us/pdf/FacilitiesListing.pdf\n\nhttp://www.dcor.state.ga.us/COMMISSIONER/PublicRelations/PressReleases/040903.html
186177
United States\n \nConsumer protection laws often mandate the posting of notices, such as this one which appears in all automotive repair shops in CaliforniaIn the United States there are a variety of laws on the federal or state levels that deal with consumer affairs including the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Truth in Lending Act, Fair Billing Act, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and much more. Federal consumer protection laws are usually enforced by the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice.\n\nAt the state level, many states have a Department of Consumer Affairs devoted to regulating certain industries and protecting consumers who regularly use goods and services from those industries.\n\nFor example, in the U.S. state of California, the Department of Consumer Affairs [1] regulates about 2.3 million professionals in over 230 different professions through its 40 regulatory entities. In addition, California encourages its consumers to act as private attorneys general through the liberal provisions of its Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civil Code § 1750 et seq.\n\n\n\nThe Social Security Number (SSN) was created in 1936 as a nine-digit account number assigned by the Secretary of Health and Human Services for the purpose of administering the Social Security laws. SSNs were first intended for use exclusively by the federal government as a means of tracking earnings to determine the amount of Social Security taxes to credit to each worker's account. Over time, however, SSNs were permitted to be used for purposes unrelated to the administration of the Social Security system. For example, in 1961 Congress authorized the Internal Revenue Service to use SSNs as taxpayer identification numbers.\n\nIn response to growing concerns over the accumulation of massive amounts of personal information, Congress passed the Privacy Act of 1974. Among other things, this Act makes it unlawful for a governmental agency to deny a right, benefit, or privilege merely because the individual refuses to disclose his SSN. \n\nSection 7 of the Privacy Act further provides that any agency requesting an individual to disclose his SSN must "inform that individual whether that disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, by what statutory authority such number is solicited, and what uses will be made of it." At the time of its enactment, Congress recognized the dangers of widespread use of SSNs as universal identifiers. In its report supporting the adoption of this provision, the Senate Committee stated that the widespread use of SSNs as universal identifiers in the public and private sectors is "one of the most serious manifestations of privacy concerns in the Nation." Short of prohibiting the use of the SSN outright, the provision in the Privacy Act attempts to limit the use of the number to only those purposes where there is clear legal authority to collect the SSN. It was hoped that citizens, fully informed where the disclosure was not required by law and facing no loss of opportunity in failing to provide the SSN, would be unlikely to provide an SSN and institutions would not pursue the SSN as a form of identification.\n\nLarge amounts of personal information, including tax information, credit information, school records, and medical records, is keyed to your Social Security Number. Because this data is often sensitive, you should keep it private.\n\nMy Social Security Number: How Secure Is It?, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse Fact Sheet 10. \nYour Social Security Number and Card, SSA Publication No. 05-10002, July 2004. \nChris Hibbert, Frequently Asked Questions on SSNs and Privacy, CPSR, January 2004. \nEPIC Privacy Act of 1974 Page. \nDepartment of Health, Education, and Welfare, Records, Computers, and the Rights of Citizens 108-35 (MIT 1973) (Social Security Number as a Standard Universal Identifier and Recommendations Regarding Use of Social Security Number). \nThe
570410
Sometimes when famous people write their memoirs, they have to leave names out for legal reasons. I'm sure if this is the case that all parties involved are sworn to secrecy, so it may never be known.
571551
see http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/aboutus/foia/index.htm
1172918
There is something called the "plain view doctrine". If it's in plain view, then it's free for all. You cannot claim the right to privacy if you place the object in such a situation wherein it can be accessed by anyone.
187009
Might be 22 states.\nhttp://www.utazas.com/utazas/forum/forum.cgi/?action=cikkek&uticel=2&file=1106101335\n\n"States that don't have lawful presence requirements (22): \n\nAK, HI, IL, MA, MI, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NM, NY, NC, ND, OR, RI, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, and WI.\n\n..."
66142
I'd rather not put up too much personal information on a website where just anyone could see it.  Although my answers will reveal some information about me, I've taken care to not give any really personally identifying information.
446058
No such thing, cause its personal/private info, not suppose to be exposed, not to mention about the web.
107812
In most states, disclosure of a criminal record other than your own is a violation of FOIA (Freedom of Information Act). You may be able to contact an agency and have them obtain that information for you for a fee, but generally, that information is not open to the public unless they are on the sex offender registry.
449987
good luck.  names and addresses are private information.
246544
what state would you want the info in?