Who's better Andy Roddick or Roger Federer?
437680
I think Andy is better than Roger.
519331
Federer because he is skillful
1050815
Sex God Naval won. the match was awesome, and Federer was very very good, esp at the beginning.
193377
Roger Federer is from Switzerland.  He started his career like most players by attending a tennis academy.  He later went on to play as an international junior touring player.  he then played Futures events then challengers and finally played ATP events.
676002
The one and only Swiss tennis star ROGER FEDERER!!!!!!!!!!!
634891
The best player - Federer
542973
nope and to be honest i dont really care as i cant stand the arrogance of him.\n\nnadal is going to win the french open by beating federer again :)
604005
Of the 2, it's still Sampras. Federer has done some amazing things.- 24 straight wins in finals, longest hard-court winning streak, 7 Slam titles so far. He's also possibly the most gifted player in history. He can routinely hit shots that noone else ever tries. He can play offense and defense equally well. \nEven so, if you look at what Pete acheived (14 Slams, #1 for six straight years, the competition he faced), it's hard to argue that Federer is better. In a few years he may well be, but he'll need to win a few more Majors first.
380856
Andy Roddick defeated Juan Carlos Ferrero 6-3 7-6 6-3 to win his first Grand Slam. Since then he hasn't won a slam but has been in the final of two Wimbledons which he lost against Federer.
565296
Roddick defeated Taylor Dent the 26th seed in the third round and he beat Sjeng Schalken the 12th seed in the quarterfinals.  Those were the only two seeds he faced until he met up with Roger Federer in the final.  He lost in a close final 6-4, 5-7, 6-7, 4-6.  I think there was a rain delay during the 3rd set and Roger came back out with a better game plan and put Andy away.
46056
Federer would win against all of these players. His return and passing shots are sufficiently strong to break Sampras and McEnroe. Borg vs. Federer would be interesting, with Borg's speed and topspin shots. However, Federer's pace and angles give him an edge. \nFederer truly has it all--strong serve (though not overpowering), fabulous topspin groundstrokes, excellent slice, solid volleys, the best footwork I've ever seen, and the ability to change strategies to cope with any opponent. The ONLY things mildly lacking to date is his fitness level (capitalized on by Nadal) and his willingness to be ruthless in closing out a match. For example, when Baghdatis was cramping in the fourth set of the Australian, instead of keeping his intensity and rolling through the set, Federer eased up and coasted.\nAll of this must be qualified by the surface. Sampras, Becker, Borg, and McEnroe all might win on grass. On clay, Federer beats these but could be beaten on a given day by any number of clay court specialists. I'll make it easy, though--if Federer played any other player in history one match on each of the four surfaces, he clearly should win at least three of four.\nIf Federer is on his game I would pick him against anyone else.
774194
I don't think McEnroe or Borg would live with Federer or the other very top players - the game has changed.\nHowever you can only beat what you are up against on the day, so McEnroe, Connors, Borg, Laver, Rosewall etc were all great for their time as was Fred Perry - where's the next Great Brit coming from - Andy Murray?
607004
Pete Sampras is 10 times better!!!
764375
I too think that he would choose Nadal to play. Nadal is the only player who has a winning record against him. There is a little bit of talking about who really is the best player on the pro circuit. I think that Federer wants the chance to beat Nadal and regain his title as the Unanimous number 1 player in the eyes of the fans.
1056008
Federer, he is amazing to watch almost one of the best players of all time except when he is matched against nadal
671588
Quite possibly.\n\nRight now, i think Nadal is better than Federer on clay however. Nadal has a few years in hand over Federer to round out the rest of his game.\n\nOnly thing that stands in Nadal's way in my opinion is his emotions. Sometimes he lets them get the best of him at the most inopportune times.
883635
On Personal Preference:\n\n1 Federer - predictable but groundbreaking, and a nicer person than most #1s\n\n2 Nadal - partly for being able to pose a Big Problem for Federer, and partly for instinctively getting how and how not to act to be great for the sport\n\n3 Nalbandian - another Federer question, plus he tends to be a level or two better at bigger events\n\n4 Davydenko - for apparently being injury-proof; he may play more tournaments in a row than some others will all year\n\n5 Blake - great story, very nice person, just needs not to go walkabout in deciding sets\n\n6 Roddick - the swagger leaves me cold, though I can appreciate why others might like it.\n\n7 Robredo - has his moments; a bit of a dark horse\n\n8 Ljubicic - a little like the pre-major-winning Lendl; maybe a bit of a whiner?\n\n1 Dementieva - must have enormous internal fortitude to get such results with such a non-asset of a serve and gets huge points for her social sensitivity in her US Open finals appearance\n\n2 Mauresmo - probably the gentlest soul among all the top players, and has really paid her dues in many respects to deserve her success\n\n3 Henin-Hardenne - glorious game, incredible competitive fire; loses points for questionable sportsmanship and too-blatant selfishness\n\n4 Clijsters - the opposite side of the JHH coin; capable of a much better resume and refreshingly open about valuing friends over trophies, but a little too content with one major title\n\n5 Kuznetsova - for making Martina Navratilova look like a genius\n\n6 Sharapova - love the intensity, maybe too marketable, MAJOR mandatory deduction for the pornographic grunting\n\n7 Hingis - great thoughtfulness on court, but lost a lot of points for making derogatory remarks about Mauresmo years ago (as well as getting into verbal fights with Richard Williams) and doesn't seem to have grown much; dating her doesn't seem to have done much good for Magnus Norman or Sergio Garcia\n\n8 Petrova - probably capable of improving, but fell at the first big hurdle