why cant I find the presidents speach on pandemic flu from nov 1 05 on fox news.com again?
450993
possibly because you have misspelled the word 'speech'
451577
Relax.  The media in the US is making people crazy about bird flu.  The rest of the world isn't concerned. Turn off the tv.
833044
You've been sick for the past two weeks, that's okay. You've been living under a rock for all your life, that's not okay. The Internet can bring you any information in seconds, why do you ask us to look for information for you?
761070
try these websites:\nwww.cdccorporation.net/newsroom/news/000488.shtml\nwww.expresscomputeronline.com/20030505/newsan2.shtml
741595
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:S0FozEIhtw0J:justfuckinggoogleit.com/\n\nHTH\n\n.
329889
There have been at least 10 influenza pandemics over the past three centuries (some just as deadly as 1918) and theoretical models have concluded that one will inevitably happen, sometime…eventually….in the future….at the some point.  There is absolutely no conclusive evidence as to when it will happen or if it will even happen in our lifetime.   \n\nRegardless if we are overdue for a major flu pandemic, this does not imply that the public should automatically “overreact” on media reports of the bird flu.  Those affected by the virus have all lived or worked in very close proximity to infected poultry. In almost all cases, domestic poultry were left to freely roam outdoors in close contact with wild aquatic birds and other wildlife.  But those in metropolitan cities are showing the greatest concern.  It is the continuous overreaction of the public which causes momentum effects in the pharmaceutical industry (and other industries for that matter).  The hype has been more about selling Tamiflu than anything else.  This is partly due to sensationalism in the media, but it's mostly due to a lack of education on effective prevention and treatment methodologies for specific diseases.  Tamiflu does absolutely nothing to cure the bird flu and never has.  It merely decreases symptoms and only under certain conditions.  Most credible scientists agree that a catastrophic pandemic such as those in the past are highly unlikely in developed countries.  This is 2006, and our methods of communication and science are light years from that time. The same technology that allows humans to travel so quickly around the globe also provides better medicine and better protection. So how in the world does anybody make the giant leap of faith that 103 deaths will translate to millions based on what we know about the H5N1 strain?    \n\nThe bird flu itself is a tragedy for the people of Asia and the livelihood of many bird handlers. Even more tragic is how an epidemic among birds has been used to orchestrate public panic and divert us from addressing other more pressing health issues. More than half a billion people suffer from malaria, nearly 10 million have tuberculosis, of which 2 million will die in the next year. Thirty million have died from HIV/AIDS and more than 40 million are infected. Yet bird flu seems to be the most pressing health concern we hear about on mainstream media.  It is a great irony that we spend more time worrying about what might be, rather than what is.  We do need to have a strong foundation for research, and there is no question that an elaborate worldwide infrastructure for epidemics must be in place before a pandemic.  I think understanding the evolutionary functions of mutating viruses is paramount in pandemic preparedness.  If the current hype helps in the building of these fundamental mechanisms, so be it.  What we DON’T need is a deceptive plot at the expense of public awareness to help inflate the stocks of a pharmaceutical company. If the current hype on Birdflu and Tamiflu is not a hoax, then I don’t know what is.
921494
not many places actually reporting cases of flu yet. Probably normal cold virus- treatment is the same at this stage anyway.
792811
I was almost afraid to look at your link (after the one yesterday).But this one is a good one. Never did the Liberal media let us Know how many of our presidents used this same ability. It was used as a propaganda tool against president Bush. Liberals were  fooled again.
215866
Try:       www.hotghettomess.com\nIt might still be there.
485727
Try here:\n\nhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1104644/posts
149611
Hi   Since NBC networking is broadcasting on tv maybe MSNBC is doing same on internet. Go to msn.com and check there . good luck
719082
There is no neutrality as with Fox and it's right wing news. It's only the work of propagandists. If you're aware that most likely your not really getting the news. Look for news with a neutral opinion such as PBS Jim Learer, that just reports the news. You make up your mind.
313171
Sorry, I can find blogs about it  but not the article itself. If you had used a quote from it it would have been able to look it up using the quoted part if it was somewhat unique.\nFor instance the following quote would be too many hits to look up "President Bush said".
226604
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=health&contentId=A45289-2000Apr9
285065
go to www.nbc.com\n\nWe tried to find this too but missed the website
368765
This administration is a day late and a dollar short on ideas. Americans have wised up now. FOX News blames everything on congress for their problems, or this week the FISA courts, and Democrats for a proposal to abolish FEMA. The GOP is engaging in the blame game big time, whoo, whoo, whoo, whine, and hiss an moan, oh woeies me, poor right wingers. They need Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh to ride in and save their mojo.
198597
Because the site was mentioned on Dateline last night and then on the news of every local NBC station afterwards.  The site has probably gotten too many hits and is down.  \n\nWait about a week until the hooplah around the show the site settles down.  Then go back and try the site again.\n\nGood luck!