I need to know more about laplaces rule or bio savart rule?
435632
and the formula is:\n\ndB = k I dl sin theta / r^2\n\nwhere k = mu0/4pi
492355
Check out Stewart's Calculus(refer to the first link). If you are looking for something  more rigorous refer to Apostol's Calculus(refer to second link).
291300
Try this:\nhttp://flash.lakeheadu.ca/~yzhang/myText/dspGuide/CH32.PDF#search='laplace%20transform'
973916
look here:\n\nhttp://www.biologie.uni-hamburg.de/b-online/e18/18c.htm
23620
If a mathematician is talking about life, he/she might be talking about the game of life. The game of life is played on a infinite grid, and there are some cells to start with. There is a simple rule to decide how a cell is born and dies. It generates pretty patterns. \nThis game seems to be pointless, but it is closely tied to chaos theory and cellular automata, which helps to solve very difficult calculus problems.
1165418
The DeMoivre Laplace theorem is a particular case of the Central Limit Theorem.... it easier to prove the CLT with advanced probability than to prove DMLT. \n\nBoth of the proofs and in Durret:   "Probability Theory and its applications", and also in Protter and Jacod: "Probability Essentials"
731450
Faraday's law of Electromagnetic induction: refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_induction\n\nThermodynamic processes: refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics
99672
honestly....good luck\n\ntry www.mathworld.com\n\ndo a search for differential equations, i think that would be your best bet...but that can get confusing...good luck
372921
http://faculty.clintoncc.suny.edu/faculty/Michael.Gregory/files/Bio%20101/Bio%20101%20Lectures/DNA/dna.htm
91154
If there are charges on the sphere, then the moving charges will produce a magnetic field. This is called the Biot-Savart law.
961641
http://hamilton.bell.ac.uk/hncexam/Samplepaper.doc ;-)
708599
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c120/dotstruc.html
444813
A quotation by Harvey J Gold, Author of Mathematical Modelling of Biological Systems,  may go towards assisting your analysis of the situation:\n\n" The result of a mathematical development should be continuously checked against one's own intuition about what constitutes reasonable biological behaviour. Whenever such a check reveals disagreement, the following possibilities must be considered:\n\na : A mistake has been made in the formal mathematical development\n\nb: The starting assumptions are incorrect and/or constitute a too drastic oversimplification\n\nc: One's own intuition about the biological field is inadequately developed.\n\nd: A penetrating new principle has been discovered. "\n\nDo let me know whether you found meaning in the above, and if you did analyse your model based on the checks recommended by him, what among a,b,c,d was the reason of the discrepancy. Of course this is assuming that you have already established the discrepancy beyond doubt.
241834
I beleive this is the one:\n\nhttp://www.phy.ohiou.edu/~braslavs/Biophysics/Articles/Wei%20Zhang/Rosensweig2002.pdf
832550
Bernoulli's principle can be tried.\nLaws of forces can be demonstrated.\nThermodynamics-transfer of heat.....etc
194029
Hi!\nI change my field of study from physics to biophysics but still its a great pleasure to solve a problem in physics if you dont mind.\nWish to see your project.\nBye
622022
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/