what doez   "i.e."    mean?
439469
internet explorer maybe?
793737
You're alive. Do something. The directive in life, the moral imperative was so uncomplicated. It could be expressed ... \nBikhari hui zulfon ko girahgeer bana lo. Rakhna hai mujhe qaid to zajeer ... to the hiphil imperative of the verbal root '-I-h () meaning "bring thou up by. ...\nhttp://my.opera.com/squibc4/blog
12706
"When you mean 'for example,' use e.g. It is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase exempli gratia. When you mean 'that is,' use 'i.e.' It is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase id est. Either can be used to clarify a preceding statement, the first by example, the second by restating the idea more clearly or expanding upon it. Because these uses are so similar, the two abbreviations are easily confused. If you just stick with good old English 'for example' and 'that is' you won’t give anyone a chance to sneer at you. If you insist on using the abbreviation, perhaps 'example given' will remind you to use 'e.g.,' while 'in effect' suggests 'I.E.'\n\n"Since e.g. indicates a partial list, it is redundant to add 'etc.' at the end of a list introduced by this abbreviation."\n- Paul Brians\n\nThis is also in Paul Brians' book "Common Errors in English Usage," which I highly recommend.
276552
Rule\nWrite I before E\nExcept after C\nOr when it sounds like an A\nAs in "neighbor" and "weigh" \n \ni before e: relief, believe, niece, chief, sieve, frieze, field, yield\n\ne before i: receive, deceive, ceiling, conceit, vein, sleigh, freight, eight\n\nExceptions\nseize, either, weird, height, foreign, leisure, conscience, counterfeit, forfeit, leisure, neither, science, species, sufficient
179385
A missing 'e' and an extra 'in'
463721
notice is a regular English verb.\nAnd like any other regular verb, it ends in -ed. In other word 'noticED'
256566
I can't even understand "B i?"..
429649
I = WAS \nYou/they =were \nshe/he/it = was
101376
sorry. not english to me. my computer keeps telling me it needs imediate attention. im stuck.
373092
http://www.eteamz.com/llb/finder/
714034
a e i o u and sometimes y
409337
When u said etc, it means 'and others'. So it means that my answer is already from etc. But anyway, I would think more about how many goals he has scored for a team in a VERY GOOD LEAGUE or TIGHT COMPETITIONS or how many saves does he do when he played for a VERY WEAK team against a VERY STRONG TEAM in a VERY GOOD LEAGUE or TIGHT COMPETITIONS(that's for the goallies). The aim of a soccer team is to WIN with wonderful goals.
632160
One trick in writing is to eliminate 'I' from the sentence.  Try to substitute it for something else.  The world is not just about ourselves.  Some examples: 1. It is my intention to..........  2.  If allowed my idea is to.........  3. My goals are to..................  4.  Personally, it is guaranteed that .............  Get the idea?  Hopefully, this helps you (instead of "I hope this helps.")
1083714
E N _ _ _ N _\n\ns q w u
773030
There are numerous exceptions to the "i before e except after c" rule - \n\nweigh, rottweiler, deity, science, neighbor, piece, vacancies, frequencies, beige, cleidoic, codeine, conscience, deify, deity, deign, dreidel, eider, eight, either, feign, feint, feisty,\nforeign, forfeit, freight, gleization, gneiss, greige,\ngreisen, heifer, heigh-ho, height, heinous, heir, heist,\nleitmotiv, neigh, neighbor, neither, peignoir, prescient,\nrein, science, seiche, seidel, seine, seismic, seize, sheik,\nsociety, sovereign, surfeit, teiid, veil, vein, weight,\nweir, weird, caffeine, casein, codeine, deil (Scots, devil), either, geisha, inveigle, keister (slang, buttocks), keister, leisure, monteith, neither, obeisance, phenolphthalein, phthalein, protein, seize, seizin, sheik, sheila (Australian slang for "girl", not capitalized), specie, species, teiid.\n\nThen consider this poem:\n\nWhen the English tongue we speak\nWhy is break not rhymed with freak?\nWill you tell me why it’s true\nWe say sew, but likewise few?\nAnd the maker of a verse,\nCannot rhyme his horse with worse?\nBeard is not the same as heard,\nCord is different from word,\nCow is cow, but low is low,\nShoe is never rhymed with foe.\nThink of hose and dose and lose,\nAnd think of goose and yet of choose,\nThink of comb and tomb and bomb,\nDoll and roll and home and some.\nAnd since pay is rhymed with say,\nWhy not paid with said I pray?\nThink of blood and food and good;\nMould is not pronounced like could.\nWherefore done, but gone and lone -\nIs there any reason known?\nTo sum up all, it seems to me\nSounds and letters don’t agree. \n\nEnglish is a tough language.  One thing we can be sure of is that there will be many exceptions to most rules.
978671
[i]  = I\n[d]s = does (without the s it would be do)\n[t]  = to or the\n[o] = of\n\nAnyway I think all the [ ] are suppose to be abbreviations and these are the most likely.◘
40728
The "I before E" rule has its exceptions, but science is not one of them.  "I before E" is only applicable when the two vowels combine to make a single sound, a diphthong.  Since we pronounce both the "I" and the "E" in "science", it doesn't apply here.\n\nSometimes it doesn't work even for words it's otherwise supposed to, like "weird" for example.