How many lives were lost in Germany during World War 1?
451463
there were 5 million military, 3 million civilian, a total of 8 million to the allies side. and 4 million military, 3 million civilian, a total of 7 million dead to the central powers of europe.
499230
Killed/Died: 8,538,315\nWounded: 21,219,452\nPrisoners/Missing: 7,750,919\nTotal Casualites: 37,508,686\nTotal Mobilized: 65,038,810
286988
there were a lot of contributions to the defeat of germany in WWI. a lot was more internal, like the German Revolution. the website talks about this and other events.
149201
Counts vary, as do references to US veterans only or world wide.\n\nAccording to Wikipedia, which I have no reason to believe is authoritative on this matter, there are 82.\n"World Totals - 82 veterans\n    * Allies (including Italy): 64\n    * Central Powers: 18"\n\nFAQ Farm has multiple contributions (from different people, such as here on Yahoo) and one contribution claims none, but give no background as to whether worldwide or country specific. (2)\n\nWhatever the number, whether 82 or anything greater than 0, it is steadily diminishing. Assuming that it was possible to lie to get into the military at 14 years old and that WW I, "The Great War," ended in 1918, then the youngest veteran would have to be 102 years old. The probability is that any living survivors are older than that and that death is immanent.
665519
French soldiers killed 1.4 million\nEnglish soldiers killed 1.2 million\nAmerican soldiers killed 180,000\n\nFrance suffered the worst loss of soldiers and the most damage to its country. 15th Century castles were destroyed along with churches, houses, and so forth. The France and English tied the hands of the Germans too tight, especially the French, and that ended up costing World War II.
771205
World War I/Great Depression
433985
I don´tt know if i can give you six for each, and it depends where you live to determine it. It played a role in trying to prevent Germany from further invasions, acts of war... but mainly to redistribute territories to european allies and to see who was going to pay for reconstruction. Most the Allies would say:\n\nStrengths:\nGave peace to a long war.\nDemilitarization of parts of Germany\nGeographical Redistribution of Germany\n\nWeaknesses:\nThey treated Germans so bad, that they felt cheated. The established Weimar Republic failed misserably (no work, hyperinflation) and that led to the rise of Hitler to power. Germans found a lost national pride with Hitler speech.
327953
over 45 million. world war 2 was because Hitler was being a jack ass.
575967
By far, the Russians. In total, including Stalin's wrath against some of the Russian people, 25 million Russians died in WWII. Two major battles, the Battle of Stalingrad, and the Battle of Berlin, over 2 million Russian soldiers died just in those two battles.
47443
World War I, also known as the First World War and (before 1939) the Great War, the War of the Nations, War to End All Wars was a world conflict lasting from August 1914 to the final Armistice (cessation of hostilities) on November 11, 1918. The label World War I or First World War did not come into general use until after the outbreak of World War II in 1939, and until then it was commonly known as the Great War or the World War. The war was fought by the Allied Powers on one side, and the Central Powers on the other, resulting in eventual victory for the Allies. No previous conflict had mobilized so many soldiers or involved so many in the field of battle. By its end, the war had become the bloodiest war in recorded history, though this record was soon to be superseded by World War II.\n\nAmongst Western countries, World War I became infamous for trench warfare along the Western Front, involving a system of opposing trenches (separated by a "No Man's Land") running from the North Sea to the border of Switzerland. More than 9 million soldiers died on the various battlefields, and nearly that many more in the participating countries' home fronts on account of food shortages and genocide committed under the cover of various civil wars and internal conflicts. In World War I, only some 5% of the casualties (directly caused by the war) were civilian - in World War II, this figure approached 50%.\n\nUltimately, World War I created a decisive break with the old world order that had emerged after the Napoleonic Wars, as modified by the mid-19th century national revolutions, the processes of European national unification and European colonialism. Three European land empires were shattered and subsequently dismembered to varying degrees: the German, the Austro-Hungarian and the Russian. In the Balkans and the Middle East, the Ottoman Empire experienced the same fate. Three European imperial dynasties, represented by the Hohenzollern, the Hapsburg and the Romanov families in Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia respectively, also fell during the war.\n\nWorld War I witnessed the first advent of Communism as a means of government in Russia. The following decades would see the transformation of the old Russian Empire into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, a global superpower. In the east, the demise of the Ottoman Empire paved the way for a modern democratic successor state, Turkey, in the core region of Anatolia, in addition to a number of successor states and territories throughout the Middle East. In Central Europe, the new states of Czechoslovakia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Yugoslavia were born and Austria, Hungary and Poland were re-created. Shortly after the war, in 1923, Fascists came to power in Italy; in 1933, 15 years after the war, Nazism took over Germany. Problems unresolved or created by the war would be highly important factors in the outbreak, within 20 years, of World War II.\n\n\n\nCauses:\n\nOn June 28, 1914, Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria and heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, was assassinated in Sarajevo by Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb student. The Archduke was there to assert imperial authority over a disputed province. Princip was supported by pan-Serbian nationalists, with links to the Serbian military. Though this assassination is usually considered the immediate trigger for the war, its origins can be traced back to the complex web of alliances and counterbalances that developed between the various European powers after 1871.\n\n\nReasons and responsibilities\nThe reasons for the outbreak of World War I are a complicated issue; there are many factors which intertwine. Some examples are:\n\nFervent and uncompromising nationalism \nUnresolved previous disputes \nThe intricate system of alliances \nConvoluted and fragmented governance \nDelays and misunderstandings in diplomatic communications \nThe arms races of the previous decades. \nRigidity in military planning
408090
First of all it was not only Soviet Russia, but all the nations that lived at that moment in USSR. because all of them fought in that war.\nYou can simply compare how many people died in that war from each country. USSR never gave a trues estimation, the last number I hear was 26 million, though I might be wrong, but for sure not even today Russia is interested in giving the true figures. Why because too many people died during that war and they did not want to demoralize the population.\nIf it weren't for the Russian winters, and several great victories like at Stalingrad..., Germany would have one, the war.Russia was the only country on the European Continent that had still a lot of reserves, and was partially occupied by Germany and it could defeat Germany. The rest of the countries whether either completely occupied or where too far away from the continent.
340668
This is a tough question because the period of fighting goes back many years. Although I'm sure actual numbers are kept on such things, it would be a safe bet to say that thousands of people die on each side each year. The real concern, however, is the number of wounded, on both sides, which is a figure that definitely exceeds the number of deaths many times over. \n\nBesides this, there are deaths that result collaterally, i.e., deaths that occur as a result of this long drawn out problem. These, too, simply increase the total number of deaths substantially.
783563
Yes.\nI keep seeing people refer to the number of men lost in WW2and I'd ask you what has that got to do with anything.\nThere was a reason for that war Roosevelt was not off on some personal vendetta against Hitler unlike the current fiasco.  Bush's yes men/woman have redefined the term cluster f...
734545
The 600,000+ is complete BS.  The 42,000+ is supposedly the number of deaths from combat or combat related incidents.  The 150,000 is the total number of deaths during the time of the war from military, insurgents, and civilian.  Keeping in mind that not all of these deaths are caused by the conflict, some are actually natural causes.  The hospitals and morgues put together a rough estimate of overall deaths.
308228
The First World War, or (before 1939) the Great War, was a world conflict lasting from August 1914 to the final Armistice on November 11, 1918. The Allied Powers (led by the United Kingdom, France and until 1917 Russia , and, after 1917, the United States) defeated the Central Powers (led by the German Empire, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire). \n\nThe Allies won.
438888
you didn't mention where,whether in WTC,or in some other places .\n\nyour second answers is there is no exact clue about how many people died over there,only you will get a approx figure.
1127808
yes. far more innocent lives have been lost than those of soldiers, and even a lot of soldiers. I heard a story that a guy ran into battle in WWII and one of the german enemy soldiers, who knew he was about to die, just looked at him and cried. So even the men fighting under the name of Hitler were as human as anyone else. War is pointless. The best way to settle desputes is to get the leaders of the nations to fight each other rather than have other people do the fighting for them, while they remain perfectly safe, miles away from the battle, with security guards everywhere. sad world, isn't it. :(