where can I find the doctrine of manifest necessity?
436965
The "doctrine of manifest necessity" isn't a document. It's a judicial doctrine that's employed, as you note, for when a second trial is warranted. \n\nIn general, the Fifth Amendment prohibits someone who's been charged and tried from being charged and tried again for the same offense. That's known as "double jeopardy." An exception to this are cases where the reason the first trial did not sucessfully conclude, and the prosecutor can show that there's reason (manifest necessity) for the defendant to be retried. The prosecutor, in this case, has a high burden of proof to show that that trial is necessary. \n\nfrom the Annotated Constitution (footnote number removed):\nA mistrial may be the result of ``manifest necessity,'' such  as where, for example, the jury cannot reach a verdict or circumstances plainly prevent the continuation of the trial. Difficult has been the answer, however, when the doctrine of ``manifest necessity'' has been called upon to justify a second trial following a mistrial granted by the trial judge because of some event within the prosecutor's control or because of prosecutorial misconduct or because of error or abuse of discretion by the judge himself. There must ordinarily be a balancing of the defendant's right in having the trial completed against the public interest in fair trials designed to end in just judgments. Thus, when, after jeopardy attached, a mistrial was granted because of a defective indictment, the Court held that retrial was not barred; a trial judge ``properly exercises his discretion'' in cases in which an impartial verdict cannot be reached or in which a verdict on conviction would have to be reversed on appeal because of an obvious error. ``If an error could make reversal on appeal a certainty, it would not serve `the ends of public justice' to require that the Government proceed with its proof when, if it succeeded before the jury, it would automatically be stripped of that success by an appellate court.'' On the other hand, when, after jeopardy attached, a prosecutor successfully moved for a mistrial because a key witness had inadvertently not been served and could not be found, the Court held a retrial barred, because the prosecutor knew prior to the selection and swearing of the jury that the witness was unavailable. Although this case appeared to establish the principle that an error of the prosecutor or of the judge leading to a mistrial could not constitute a ``manifest necessity'' for terminating the trial, Somerville distinguished and limited Downum to situations in which the error lends itself to prosecutorial manipulation, in being the sort of instance which the prosecutor could use to abort a trial that was not proceeding successfully and to obtain a new trial in which his advantage would be increased."\n\n(source: http://www.eco.freedom.org/ac92/ac92pg1285.shtml and subsequent pages)
169962
Try the Encarta Encyclopedia online, it should be in there.
1143889
One place to look:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability
144776
I've listed two source for it below.\n\nGood Luck!
294310
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/\nLook for the icon labelled Oklahoma Statutes & Constitution
235686
Go to the following site and use the search button in the top right corner. \n\nhttp://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/index.html
10007
Try the source below.
103325
I FOUND IT!\n\nHere: http://www.eldritchpress.org/jwj/auto.htm
519089
Type the words "electronic dissertation" and "contingency theory" in your search engine. Also go libraries and bookstores and ask the clerks/librarians to help you.
325635
http://www.proecentral.com/portal/essentials/
814159
http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/ucc.table.html
1154296
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
106293
I think u can go to their website\n\nwww.prenhall.com\n\nThere you can find resources and in that you can look for the book
328897
this is my humble understanding,Ok, what I understand from the Relevancy; collateral matters. there must be an evidence such a relativity to the fact in issue as to persuade belief in its being or absence. Evidence on collateral matters shall not be permissible, except for when it tends to be any reasonable degree to establish the probability or improbability of the fact in issue.
570995
It would probably be better to research the answer for yourself. Check here as to what there doctrines are.
176963
Self Exaltation 101 (the covert kind)\n\nSEE LINK:
112081
Here is a great site: http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres61.html