is it true that "JESUS"  and "MARY MAGDALENE" had an affair?
455133
Not Necessarily. People tend to synthesize that conclusion because of the closeness of Jesus to Mary of Magdala. They were close mainly because it was Jesus that saved her from death by stoning, and that she was the only privileged female to be with Jesus and the disciples during the former's  public ministry. According to the Council of Nicea, Jesus had a dual nature: both Human and Divine. The followers of Macedonius, called the Macedonians, opposed this and said that Jesus was purely of Human nature.The Council treated the Macedonians as heretics because of this and defended the doctrine of the Dual Nature. Some may say that because there is this Human Nature present in Jesus, there may be a possibility that He succumbed to  this nature and had an affair with Mary of Magdala, but honestly, only God Knows.
744941
No.. there are two marys.. mary the mother of Jesus.. and Mary Magdalen.. the prostitute Jesus saved from getting killed by a mod..
741038
The Da Vinci Code is as explained by Leigh Teabing to Sophie Neveu, the figure at the right hand of Jesus is supposedly not the apostle John, but Mary Magdalene. According to the book Mary Magdalene was the wife of Jesus Christ and was in fact pregnant with his child when Jesus was crucified. The absence of a chalice in the painting supposedly indicates that Leonardo knew that Mary Magdalene was actually the Holy Grail (the bearer of Jesus' blood). This is said to be reinforced by the letter "V" that is created with the bodily positions of Jesus and Mary, as "V" is the symbol for the sacred feminine. The apparent absence of the "Apostle John", under this interpretation, is explained by identifying John as "the Disciple Jesus loved", allegedly code for Mary Magdalene (see also Second Apocalypse of James). The book also notes that the color scheme of their garments are exactly inverted: Jesus wears a red blouse with royal blue cape; John/Mary wears a royal blue blouse with red cape  — perhaps symbolizing two bonded halves of marriage.\n\nAccording to the novel, the secrets of the Holy Grail, as kept by the Priory of Sion, are as follows:\n\nThe Holy Grail is not a physical chalice, but a woman, namely Mary Magdalene, who carried the bloodline of Christ. \n\nThe Old French expression for the Holy Grail, San gréal, actually is a play on Sang réal, which literally means "royal blood" in Old French. \n\nThe Grail relics consist of the documents that testify to the bloodline, as well as the actual bones of Mary Magdalene. \n\nThe Grail relics of Mary Magdalene were hidden by the Priory of Sion in a secret crypt, perhaps beneath Rosslyn Chapel. \n\nThe Church has suppressed the truth about Mary Magdalene and the Jesus bloodline for 2000 years. This is principally because they fear the power of the sacred feminine. \n\nMary Magdalene was of royal descent (through the Jewish House of Benjamin) and was the wife of Jesus, of the House of David. That she was a prostitute was slander invented by the Church to obscure their true relationship. At the time of the Crucifixion, she was pregnant. After the Crucifixion, she fled to Gaul, where she was sheltered by the Jews of Marseille. She gave birth to a daughter, named Sarah. The bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene became the Merovingian dynasty of France. \nThe existence of the bloodline was the secret that was contained in the documents discovered by the Crusaders after they conquered Jerusalem in 1099 (see Kingdom of Jerusalem). The Priory of Sion and the Knights Templar were organized to keep the secret. \n\nThe secrets of the Grail are connected, according to the fictional novel, to Leonardo Da Vinci's work as follows:\n\nLeonardo was a member of the Priory of Sion and knew the secret of the Grail. The secret is in fact revealed in The Last Supper, in which no actual chalice is present at the table. The figure seated next to Christ is not a man, but a woman, his wife Mary Magdalene. Most reproductions of the work are from a later alteration that obscured her obvious female characteristics. \nThe androgyny of the Mona Lisa reflects the sacred union of male and female which is implied in the holy union of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Such parity between the cosmic forces of masculine and feminine has long been a deep threat to the established power of the Church. The name Mona Lisa is actually an anagram for "Amon L'Isa", referring to the father and mother gods of Ancient Egypt (namely Amun and Isis). \n\nA number of different authors also speculate about the possibility of Jesus becoming a father. There are at least three children attributed to him, a daughter Tamar, born before the Crucifixion, and two sons Jesus (the Jesus Justus from the New Testament) and Josephes, both born after the Resurrection. Their names are now part of the common culture of conspiracy writers, however only two decades ago, when Holy Blood,
585535
Well, we know two things that support the idea that Christ and Mary might have married and had children.  Firstly, at the time that Christ lived, Hebrew tradition strongly encouraged men to father children, as this would add strength to the Hebrew community and help to ensure that Abraham's bloodline last throughout the ages.  Secondly, according to Phillip's gospel, Christ and Mary had a romantic relationship.  Phillip makes several references to this, most notably: "Christ loved Mary more than all the disciples and used to kiss her often on the mouth."  So, yes, it is quite likely that they were married.  However, there are no historical records that clearly indicate children, though given Hebrew tradition, this posibility also remains.  There is also no hard evidence that Christ did not die on the cross.  All of the arguments related to a potential 'crucifixtion hoax' are circumstantial, at best.\n\nSide note:  The Da Vinci Code is a fiction novel, NOT a historical reference.  The book is a combination of historical facts and complete fabrications.  So, I fear that most people will have difficulty separating one from the other.
654116
Basically saying that Jesus was married and had a child with Mary Magdalene...that's the big "secret."  In the end, it would mean that there are living descendents of Jesus Christ alive today.  That's the secret that they were trying to protect.  And they say that the Holy Grail is not a cup...but rather it is the tomb of Mary Magdalene herself.
643616
There are Gnostic Gospels that talk about him kissing Mary on the mouth.  There are also clues in the New Testament that may point to him being married.  For instance, the annointing would have ended in stoning for both him and the woman if they were not married.\n\nIn addition it would have been totally abnormal for a Jewish Rabbi not to be married at that time period.\n\nThere are also legends and many tales in Southern France of Mary Magdalene coming there with a child.
487880
Jesus had a half brother named James.  He wrote one of the books in the bible.  There is no proof Jesus was married, that was a made up fact to promote a book and a movie.
629928
It still is a pack of lies about Jesus Christ. He was never married and had no children. If he had done either, these would have been special events in his life that would have been recorded in the Gospels of the bible. Just like when he attended the wedding at Cana where he turned water into wine.
452557
No, the Bible, nor any other manuscript says that they were married. The Da Vinci Code is a lie, and attempts to undermine the Christian faith. Jesus came for one reason, to save mankind!
1179184
john chapetr 12:1-3? it just says mary. some take that to mean mary magdalene.\nyou must not assume mary magdalene was a whore. the bible doesn't say that.
29702
i am quite positive that he did. and i think it would be to mary magdalene, who by the way was NOT a prostitute. the prostitute who was stoned to death was not named. mary magdalene's name just came subsequently after the story of the prostitute so many people immediately assumed that she was the prostitute.\n\nmary magdalene may also have been a discipple of christ, and she supposedly has a book that was omitted from the bible (it's a man's world). there are even references in scripture that mary magdalene was the one who jesus would often kiss. \n\ni dont see why so many people are so offended by the idea that jesus christ was married. whether or not he was god, he came to earth to live as MAN. i mean to be so offended at the thought of a married jesus seems as though people think marraige is wrong. i mean marriage is supposed to be sacred to christians, why shouldn't jesus have done it?
245284
It's an interesting book of fiction, but it is factually absurd. There is plenty of real evidence of the biblical account of Jesus' life. I suggest also reading the book, "Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel. It is very enlightening!
569742
briefly it says that \n-Jesus is a prophet\n-Christian practise are adopted by paganism\n-Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene\n-The Church corrupted her image as well as the image of all women in power, even midwives\n-The Church is corrupted and has been hiding the truth for political gain\n-Jesus had a child, a girl named Sarah that decsendents still live today\n\nAll the above was kept by the Priory of Sion lead once by Leo Davinci and he kept these secrets in codes on his paintings.\n\nMuslims belief all except that he was married and had a child. Christians think it a load of crap.
683191
Let's see... bible says Jesus walked on water, turned water into wine, rose dead people (disciples also rose dead people), who knows what else; DVC (((((a novel)))) says Jesus was a married man with kids. Which is likely closer to the truth?\n\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\n\n...Please excuse me, but the laughter of Jesus in the gospel of Judas is contagious.
1029480
It wasn't an affair. They were married. And even if he did, why is everyone always picking on Jesus? Seriously, everyone's always trying to prove that he was bad or worng or didn't exist or something. If people want to believe that Jesus is the saviour, then let them. Why are people that choose not to believe so concerned about Jesus?
1142561
Why don't you Pray and meditate on that question and see if the Lord will reveal the truth to you.  The Book was written and categorized as Fiction.  The first line in the book says, "This is a book of Fiction"\n\nI am overjoyed for the fact that this book/movie has sparked such a great interest in my savior.  Can you imagine how many have picked up a Bible to read more about the Christ, that would have never touched it otherwise? Until this Movie came out, only about 10% of the population knew who Mary Magdalene was? I saw a blip on CNN News the other day that People are taking Bibles right and left out of hotel rooms since the release of the Movie.  I truly think that the Authors intention when writing this book was to promote Christianity.
614798
Most of the book is a fabrication.  The National Geographic channel and 60 min. recently had specials on this topic, exposing the completely fraudulent claims made in the book. \n\nThe thing I find the most humorous is that numerous non-Christians have exposed many of the false claims.  Any knowledgeable historian who has looked into the matter will tell you the same thing.\n\nA plethora of books have been published exposing the bogus claims of the book, including the "FACT PAGE".  \n\nThe title itself is repugnant to art historians.  da Vinci means "from Vinci", it is not a last name. Any art buff will tell you they refer to him as "Leonardo". Furthermore, Leonardo experts will tell you that he did not put hidden meanings into his paintings.  In his painting of the Last Supper, there is a picture of John to Jesus' left. The book claims that this is actually Mary Magdalene. John has a somewhat feminine appearance, but John was young. Leonardo and others painted what we know was John many other times with feminine looking features, we still have these paintings.\n\nThe book claims that there was a secret organization called the Priory of Scion created to protect documents that proved Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married. THERE IS NO FACTUAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THIS CLAIM.) On a logical level, if this secert were so terrible, then why wouldn't they just destroy the documents? It doesn't make sense. \n\netc.etc.etc.