What is the only "Absolute" in science?
443587
That there isn't any Absolute at all
483739
Absoultue zero in terms of Kelvin is impossible to obtain because there can never be nothing
20386
Yes it the basic and supreme law ever made in science. i holds to anything not only science. u cannot imagine a situation where u can disprove it.\nso naturally its a great law ever made.
764514
.    The concept of God the Absolute includes all . Time , space and beyond. All realities are found therein . Error , evil , sin , and iniquity are unreal and are lost in the totality of reality.
682438
Infinity.Any number divided by 0 is infinity.
40336
Absolutes dictate the universe, for truth abounds everywhere... as relativism being a dark force and absolutism being the light, the two can not exist in one area at the same time and place. Jesus Christ taught absolutes, he was not a person living in the grayness of life, but as creator knew all. He was in absolute control of all absolutes, and even obeyed the laws he created and was subject to himself, for he could not lie, etc. He went as far to say that no man could approach God his Father and go to heaven unless they come through him. If ever an absolute existed, this does and must be personally addressed in each and everyone of our lives, for one day we shall all stand before God and give account. The laws that we teach and are taught to obey in our everyday lives are not limited to the physical, but also must be accepted in the spiritual, for we all are spiritual being in subjection to the absolutes of God. If we disagree with absolutes, we fall into relativism, don't fall my friend.
144170
Space would have be the absolute reference. Since according to Relativity that reference does not exist than there is no way of determining any parameter.\nTo Answer that you ahave to go outside relativity theory where an absolute frame of reference is found.
869413
There is no proof that our universe is, was or will be the only universe.  The nature of reality is that we can only study and observe what is in our universe, so we will never know because there is no way to find out.
278842
Disregard butchtroll, he doesn't know anything and is obviously just guessing.\n\nA absolute zero, although practically impossible to reach, it is theoretically very easy to calculate. Just assume that all particles have a velocity of zero, and calculate the lowest potential structure according to the lennard-jones potential and possible electro-static potential. The result concludes a structure quite similar to crystals at living-room temperature.\n\nButch - practically as in cannot be obtained through anything but theoretical experiments. Although, temperatures can actually be achieved that is sufficiently low to allow, in some degree, to regard matter as having a temperature of absolute zero. Theoretically, if such matter should exist, it would affect the universe in any significant way. That the universe cease to exist if absolute zero was reached, would be a prerequisite, not a result. You can do that math yourself and see if it is possible - or borrow the particle similator program I've written.\n\nmore: I find it funny that you preach about humility, after calling me an idiot. Especially after mixing different types of energy together and calling the lot for temperature. Sure, if an atom contain absolutely no energy, it would collapse into a black hole. But temperature is NOT a measure of total energy.\n\nyet more: Still you call me an idiot, and still you attempt to call humiliary high ground. I'm not saying I know everything myself - but wheter temperature is all energy, or just momentum of "particles", is pretty far from'everything'. As a student in nanotechnology, I can honestly say that, you sir, are blinded by your own feeble knowledge of physics. Temperature of matter is usually described as the summation of vibrational, momentum, rotational energy and phonons. NOT electronic excitation or any kind of potential energy.\n\nYour question was inane, and I *did* answer it. Nothing would happen with the universe if a cloud of hydrogen would suddenly come into existence with a temperature of zero kelvin. If you don't understand what I'm writing, just say so, instead of stating that I didn't answer your question.\n\nWhat do you attempt to prove with your citation? You seem lost, sir?\n\nWhat do you need a value of? What the temperature of the solid hydrogen would be after 1 second? Sorry, but I don't care enough to calculate how much a certain amount of hydrogen crystal would increase in temperature from background radiation.
901353
It would have been helpful if you had cited where Einstein said this.\n\nBut here's the deal...all motion is relative (which is why the theory is called the theory of "relativity")...relative to something or somethings.  Even things that seem to be perfectly still, like the tree in your front yard, are moving relative to something...relative to the sun, for example.  In other words, there is no such thing as an absolute motion relative to absolute zero velocity.\n\nWith all these motions (velocities) we have accelerations (v = at; a = v/t) that are, like their velocities, not absolute.  They, too, are relative.  So, as F = ma or F = mv^2/r = (m(v/t)^2)/r, the associated forces are relative.\n\nAs a consequence, there are forces acting on everything, even when none is readily apparent.  That tree, for example, has weight, which is one force.  But it also has a kinetic force (centripetal) due to its spin around the Earth and its revolution around the sun while on the Earth.  Then there's the motion of the solar system around the center of the galaxy, the motion of the galaxy through the universe, and the expansion of the universe itself.\n\nSo a single measured force is really the vector sum of all those other forces created by all those other motions.  So the notion that there is but a single force at work is "fictitious."  The good news is that the single force usually works in our observable world because we can ignore the effects of all those other forces.  But, alas, that is not the case in the relativistic world of near light speeds.  That is probably why Einstein would indicate what you claim he did.
144168
Absolute zero is a fundamental lower bound on the temperature of any macroscopic system. It is approximately -273.15 degrees Celsius. It is unachievable in practice but it exists as a limit for real physical phenomena, and it was inferred by extrapolation from kinetic theory, and from other considerations in theoretical physics. One would like to define it as the temperature at which all motion ceases, but even at absolute zero some motion remains due to the requirements of quantum mechanics. Alternate definitions are that absolute zero is the temperature at which no further energy can be extracted from a physical body, or the temperature at which the entropies of perfect crystals vanish, or the temperature at which the entropy change of an adiabatic process vanishes.\n\nA state of absolute zero was first proposed by Guillaume Amontons in 1702 who was investigating the relationship between pressure and temperature in gases. He lacked accurate and precise thermometers so his results were only semi-quantitative, but he established that the pressure of a gas increases by roughly one-third between "cold" temperatures and the boiling point of water. His work led him to speculate that a sufficient reduction in temperature would lead to the disappearance of pressure. The problem is that all real gases liquefy during the approach to absolute zero.\n\nIn 1848, William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin proposed an absolute thermodynamic temperature scale in which equal reduction in measured temperature gave rise to equal reduction in the heat of a body. This freed the concept from the constraints of the gas laws and established absolute zero as the temperature at which no further heat could be removed from a body. Absolute zero has never been reached, and it appears it never will be. It may be asymptotically approached like the speed of light, but never attained.\n\nKinetic theory and motion\nAccording to kinetic theory, there should be no movement of individual molecules at absolute zero, so any material at this temperature would be solid. In a monatomic gas, most of the energy is in the form of translational motion, and the temperature can be measured in terms of the distribution of this motion, with slower speeds corresponding to lower temperatures, perhaps even down to absolute zero. But this is contrary to experimental evidence, and it is predicted that helium will never solidify, no matter how much it is cooled or compressed.\n\nBecause of quantum-mechanical effects, the speed at absolute zero is larger than zero and depends, along with the energy, on the volume within which a particle is confined. At absolute zero, the molecules and atoms in a system are all in their ground state, the state of lowest possible energy, and a system has the least amount of kinetic energy allowed by the laws of physics. But the lowest possible zero-point energy for a confined particle in a box is not zero. Rather than being fixed and non-moving, the equation for the energy levels shows that no matter how low the temperature gets, even when the quantum number takes its minimum value of one, a particle still has some translational kinetic energy and motion. This is a reflection of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which states that the position and the momentum of a particle cannot both be known precisely at any given time.\n\nSimilarly, using the harmonic approximation for the vibrations of a diatomic molecule, the quantum harmonic oscillator yields a positive zero-point energy even when the vibrational quantum number takes its minimum value of zero. For polyatomic molecules, and for bodies such as crystals, whose normal mode motions can not be assigned to individual atoms or chemical bonds, the lowest-energy state is that of the system as a whole.\n\nClassically, the absolute temperature T of a system of molecules at thermodynamic equilibrium assigns an average of 1/2 kT to each quadratic kinetic and/or potential energy term in each mechanica
940936
Milton is Da MAN!\n\nYes...physics is the top dog in science. It could be argued that Chemistry isn't even a science.
1032403
No because an atom is only a single element and thus such a "universe" would have no chemical composition except for the single atom it would have been made from
706630
some of these sound like biology questions and i'm a little rusty but i'll see what i can do..\n\n1. Define 'absolute you are zero' and explain why we can't get to it.\n\nabsolute zero is when everything is zero degrees. the reason we cannot reach absolute zero is because everything is touching another thing. which means heat is transferred to anything and everything, so it's impossible for everything to be zero degrees. if we were to reach absolute zero you would be able to walk through a wall because the atoms would all slide past eachother, because they wouldn't be moving because the moving makes heat. that's just an example because i'm not very good at explaining the concept, i just understand it.\n\n2. (+1)+(-78)= -77\n3. (-10)+(-5)= -15\n4. Define what homogeneous is and give me an example. \n\nhomogeneous means: homo-same. geneous-genes/traits. for example two people with brown eyes are homogeneous because they have the same trait for that eye color in their dna.\n\n5. Define what hertrogeneous is and give me an example. \n\nsame thing as above but hetero-different. like someone with brown eyes and another person with green.\n\n6. If there are 16 the winner!!! people at a party and 5 leave and it doubled for the amount of people, how much are there now? 22\n7. (-9)+(-7)= -16\n8. Who is the author of the Gaurdians of Ga'Hoole series. i don't know\n9. Who is the author of Deltora Quest. i don't know\n10. This one is a code. The code is hid in this post. ????
991800
The Laws of Thermodynamics does not preclude the possibility of reaching absolute ZERO, even though it is practically extremely difficult to reach.\n\nHowever, it is physically IMPOSSIBLE to reach absolute ZERO for another reason: Quantum Jitters.\n\nAt the subatomic level, no particle will stay absolutely motionless. At very short time and spatial scales, there are huge fluctuations consisting of particle-antiparticle pairs with arbitrary amounts of energy. Even space and time itself are fluctuating. This means you can NEVER achieve absolute zero.\n\nThis quantum jitter is due to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, but even beyond that there is what is called "vaccum energy", meaning that even in empty space devoid of any matter or energy, there is still a minimal level of energy contained in space itself.
858610
A pure substance would be 100% one type of atom/element, such as gold (Au).  A mixture, is a combination of two or more types of atoms/elements.
946519
I would have to say physics, especially for a theoreticist.. If you ask me, physics has a purity to it that is not present in anything called engineering...