How severe of a crime is aiding and abetting?
454383
As guilty as the person you aided. Usually you get a plea bargain in which you fully corporate with the prosecution and you will receive substantially less jail/prison time.
1139267
There are three major classifications of 'breaking the law' the most severe is a felony (punishable by more then a year of incarceration generally served in a prison, IE homicide, robbery), the second one is a misdemeanor (punishable by incarceration up to a year generally served in a jail, IE criminal trespass, harassment), the third and least serious is a violation (punishable by fines and up to 15 days in jail, IE running a stop sign, speeding) (varies state to state). Now to answer your question felonies and misdemeanors are crimes, violations are not crimes.
1181289
hmmm.. i dont think so.. unless it is a really really bad crime
1052275
Does seem a bit out of whack...now the one committing the crime is considered the victim of an uncaring society.\n\nMy favorite is that folks will be sent to jail for longer sentance for tax evasion than for a robbery & assualt or even rape.
95893
motive, intent and execution of crime.
495944
ABSOLUTELY you are.\n\nThat is aiding and abetting.\n\nNot to mention you are an AMERICAN or at least you LIVE IN AMERICA and you should be following AMERICAN laws.
368475
It depends on the intent when the crime was committed. Ex. Murder one is premeditated with malicious intent.
909805
It depends on what they did.\nIf they provided the means, or assisted the person, they are criminally responsible.
693678
It would depend on the individual case. If the police and/or prosecution had planted evidence or hid evidence that would have proved someones innocence, then deliberately and knowingly prosecuted an innocent man, then yes, under those circumstances I feel both criminal and civil charges should be brought against the "People". But unfortunately our law system is not perfect and even when everything is done by the book, sometimes an innocent person is found guilty of a crime that they did not commit. In those cases you cannot blame the prosecution or law enforcement, and it would be unfair to penalize them.
603471
Any person, male or female, who knowingly helps hide crime done by  religious clergy (regardless of gender here also and regardless of which religion it is) should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.  By law they are aiding and abetting a criminal.  It is morally and ethically wrong no matter the religious background involved.\n\nBy hiding wrongdoings, these people foster a culture in which ethics have no place.  They thereby encourage the behavior because they do not show their own how wrong the behavior is.  Hiding wrongdoings makes occurrences more frequent and more has to be hidden creating a vicious cycle.\n\nThe people who knowingly hide these acts are just as responsible as the ones committing them and deserve the same retributions for their acts.
780718
Depends on lots of things. \nThe crime\nWhether the Criminal is seen as an immediate danger to the public.\nThe amount of evidence collected and still to collect.
1186355
usually, white collar crimes receive a lesser penalty than violent crimes. My personal feelings on how that differentiation is really messed up, a lawyer is absolutely the best person to consult on this matter.
1059691
Its a crime against the State-to go against the State is a crime against the country-Treason.\nIt includes many civil-trespassing-disorderly-       fraud  and a hundred others.
485680
Attempted Murder is not a Capital Offense. For it to be a Capital Offense their must Aggrevating Circumstances. Like killing someone while comitting a armed robbery. Or, doing the killing in a particularly gruesome manner. Like torture.
1167077
innocent to be locked up.  if someone has a propensity for criminal behavior, there is a chance they will meet justice eventually.
677690
Depends on the type of crime.
821867
It depends on how often the offense has happened and the severity of it.