where can i find the case Marsh et al. v. American Locker Co., Inc.?
440826
In a law library. The cite is 7 N.J.Super. 81. A reference librarian should be able to help you find a reporter that includes the case.
296890
a good source is the "find law" website http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html
506152
www.legalzoom.com\nor for references \nwww.handelonthelaw.com
750174
Look up the Tom Capano case in Delaware!\n\nhttp://www.delawareonline.com/newsjournal/capano/trial/
892993
could try here http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/
54770
Yes. District Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals\n\nWEEKS v. U S , 245 U.S. 618 (1918)\n\nThis was a prosecution under the Act of June 30, 1906, c. 3915, 34 Stat. 768, upon a charge of shipping an article of food in interstate commerce in circumstances making the shipment a violation of the act. The information contained two counts, both charging that the article was misbranded-one because it bore a false and misleading label, and the other because it was offered for sale as lemon oil when in truth it was an imitation thereof containing alcohol and citral derived from lemon grass. In the District Court there was a conviction upon both counts, and the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the conviction as [245 U.S. 618, 620] to the first count and affirmed it as to the second. 224 Fed. 64, 139 C. C. A. 626. The judgment upon the latter is all that is brought here for review.\n\nIn the Circuit Court of Appeals the view was expressed [245 U.S. 618, 623] that intent was not an element of the offense charged in the second count and therefore that it was immaterial whether the representations of the salesman had the sanction of the defendant. Complaint is now made of this. But the question is not in the case, the view expressed by the Circuit Court of Appeals not being essential to an affirmance of the judgment. The District Court had expressly instructed the jury that to hold the defendant responsible criminally by reason of such representations it must appear, and appear beyond a reasonable doubt, that they were made by his authority. The record before us does not show that the defendant objected to the submission of this question to the jury in this way; neither does it purport to contain all the evidence. The verdict therefore must be taken as conclusively determining that the representations were made with the defendant's sanction.\n\nJudgment affirmed
285031
http://www.justia.us/index.html\n\nSearch for 'telegraph'
468871
There is 2 places you can look......\n\nhttp://www.odcr.com/\n\nhttp://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/casesearch.asp
932372
Try the Quizlaw website.  \nGoogle "Celebrity lawsuit" and/or "Borat"
1179351
You might find your answer here http://www.caseassist.com/Links/CriminalJustice1.htm look for State of Pennsylvania Ofender Tracking and Information System.\n\nGood Luck!
402101
just type findlaw.com
1084081
www.nolo.com or www.findlaw.com.
898075
I can't find the text of the decision online, but if you have access to LexisNexis or Westlaw, the citation for the case is 595 F. Supp. 1521. You could also go to a law library and look it up in the Federal Reporter. The ruling was made by a Connecticut Federal District Court in 1984.
810927
Are you talking about DeRolph vs. State of Ohio? Try the link below, which gives a chronology of the case. Or try searching on "DeRolph vs. State of Ohio" for other links that may give you the information you need. Good luck!
918335
Try nolopress.com or legalzoom.com.  Either one may help.
712789
Go online and find the state or federal website with the courts.   Click on "view case history" or "minute entries"....or words similar to these.  Each State is different.  Good Luck
811091
http://www.icle.org/Michlaw/oview.cfm?caseid=11818111