if an airliner crushes exactly on the borderline between Canada and USA where will they bury the survivors?
445821
you can't bury survivors
806521
Canada's northest point would be Baffin Island. It's part of Nunavut, a territory in Canada.
993998
so old the surviver survided they dnt bury thm
930891
At least 3 - 4 years if underground in a coffin.  \n")
1158233
to the burial ground.
655454
Canada. Vancouver area. You'll fit right in.
722056
It was a plane!!! The passengers died and the plane is disintegrated. Look at flight 97...the one that crashed in the field...tell me...where is the plane and passengers...at that speed and height nothing is left for viewing...its all disintegrated. Or perhaps you can explain to the families that lost love ones that it was some secret missile.
563223
airport or maybe somewhere that they have radar  DUH !!!!
1063847
There is no proof. All the evidence disappeared to China or the bottom of the ocean. Why were they so quick to get rid of that steel? Do you really believe that jet fuel gets hot enough to collapse an I beam? Hell, I've picked out beer cans after a bonfire. Duh! And as far as I know, airliners aren't made for knocking down buildings. They are light so they can fly. Have ever seen a crash site? There usually isn't a whole lot of recognizable things left. A building that would collapse after getting hit like that wouldn't pass a NYC building code exam.
915580
You DONT bury survivors!!!!
1045134
I'm not absolutely certain, but I'm thinking Canada, Vancouver actually.\n\n-J.
369678
Prison, Canada, or Europe.
79715
Under the ocean floor all over the world, there are pockets of Methane. When this methane erupts and bubbles to the surface, it lowers the density of the water, causing a floating ship to sink instantly to the bottom of the column of gas and water and into the hole from where the gas emerged. When the sand settles, it settles into the hole, back over the ship, so no wreckage is found.\n\nAs for planes, the column of methane travels skyward, lowering the density of the air, and the same principle applies, complete with a quick trip to the bottom and a watery grave. No wreckage.\n\nThe Bermuda Triangle has twice the methane deposits of the rest of the world.\n\nJust a theory, but what do you think?\n\nkeptcompany@yahoo.com
321156
in retrospect, more should have gone to Canada.\nThey'd be alive now.
918837
In theory there is no upper bound except those imposed by real-world engineering constraints.\n\nThe Russians popped an underground event in Siberia that was a bit over 50 megatons.  It *moved* the entire  Siberian techtonic plate something like a centimeter and they decided that was probably as big as they needed to test ☺\n\nSay you detonated something in the 10 megaton range at an altitude of about 5 miles.  Pretty much everything within about a 3 mile radius of 'ground zero' is going to be, literally, vaporized.  In fact, the top 30 or 40 feet of ground zero is going to be vaporized, leaving a sort of round 'dish' shaped depression a mile or so across in the ground.  Inside this radius, the 'dish' will be coated with a 'slag' formed as melted soil and rock cools.  Depending on the minerals in the area, some of these slags are quite colerful and would make excellent souvenirs.  (Just avoid the ones that glow in the dark ☺)  Everything out to about 10 miles or so will be knocked flat and/or incinerated (total destruction on the surface) by the heat and shock wave.  The structural damage begins to fall off after that, but significant damage to structures would still occur at ranges of 20 or more miles.  People directly exposed to the event would be killed (instantly) by the radiation at distances of up to about 10 miles.  After that, survival probabilities would increase logarithmically out to about 30 to 35 miles.  Life expectency (which would be zero out to ranges up to about 10 miles)  would go up along a logarithmic curve out to a range of about 100 miles or so, at which point the mean expected lifetime (post event) would be about the same as it was before the event.  One exception would be optical effects.  Anyone looking in the general direction of the event would probably be blinded out to a range of 30 to 40 miles.\n\n\nDoug
728891
well as far as i know the biggest border in the world can be found between  USA and canadian  . there is several issues currently with that border :\n\nfirst the whole entire border has around 1000 immigration agents or a little bit more and from what i know both Canadians and Americans cross it as they like with out any restrictions . \n\nsecond there is curently many weapons being smugle into Canada from the US side which are making the lives of all canadians pretty hard , canada as far as i know has though laws regarding owning weapons but the constant contraband from the USA is making the situation pretty caotic for the autorities and all canadians .\n\nand third as we all know four terrorist already crossed from Canada into America and caused the most terrible thing America has ever live in its entire history . i think we should never forget that not matter how close America is to Canada , this should never be forgotten . i must add than this shoulld never be blamed on them but on us who did not pay enough attention and who did not care about bin laden as much as we shoulda care .
435911
riddsridds i feel the same way  they will take from canada, let them seperate who cares anyways.\ncanadianphatkid@hotmail.com