occam's razor.  you ever heard of it?
448622
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.
49951
There is no such thing.\n\nYour uncle needs proof that it exists. I'm guessing he doesn't.
234988
I think it's a way of saying you don't believe it.
1037551
Well no, it isn't true. It's a webpage from a random nutcase. The internet is full of them. this one isn't even very entertaining.\n\nIf you are going to waste your time reading the webpages of psuedoscientific loonies (as I often do) you should at least look for the entertaining ones.\n\nI recommend the site below.
933924
No one knows where it really comes from.  Many people have hypotheses, but nothing definitive & irrefutable.  I have heard it myself & don't care to ever again.  It was creepy.
307282
that math formula that proves it is SO WRONG! i just talked about this with someone, if you look at the formula it gets messed up like halfway through.\n\ndo we need to break this down?\none fish + one fish = 2 fish
1127376
Good Question, which took me several minutes of valuable on-line time here at the Library to even consider a possible cause.\n\nPerhaps this overdramatized dualistic Labeling is PROOF of the lazy "lowest common denominator" of COMMON humans? This form of Aristotelian "thinking" harks back to the Ancient Greeks, so is not a new phenomenon, at all. Notice all the bloody WARS throughout recorded human history?\n\nAlfred Korzybsky, author of "SCIENCE & SANITY" and other General Semantics books, identifies this rigid, two-valued form of "Logic" as THE key factor in mental break-downs in thought; i.e. ( human misuse of Language leading TO actual INsanity!). He made his own observations  in psychiatric wards personally supervised in his work. \n\nDoctor Korzybsky (sp?) recommends re-training in General Semantics & MULTI-VALUED Logical analysis & description as a key help, if not a  REMEDY for such insanities! (Of course, those  NOT caused primarily by actual, Neurological Disease.)\n\nBinary or Boolean "Logic" is usefull in design of  NON-organic systems such as computer hardware, but dangerous if used to address REAL Life problems, or in Science and the Arts. The  simplest set of "Logical" values would be Trinary; i.e 3-valued!\n"Yes", "No", and "Maybe/Don'tknow4sure"!  \n\nThe simplistic use of "LIBERAL" versus "CONSERVATIVE" stereotyping you HEAR on the (AM) Talk Shows probably indicates frightened but LAZY Thinking of the commoner who  calls-into these programs. LIB/CON dualisms could also be a deliberate & manipulated RHETORICAL ploy of political pseudo-thinkers who wish to push their OWN (often stupid!) AGENDA! \n\nOoops! Sorry. Got carried away there.  Go READ Korzybsky!
340467
Very dubious.\nLook here:
898523
It's actually a "test" of the purety of your mind.  I really think it's a bunch of bunk - but if you really want to check it out, go to your web browswer and type in upholstrification.
647267
I think it's "Ad hominem". \n\nThis link will give you more info: http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html
1019266
It's fake \n\nThat is a program gives u an expected possibility
674533
No and neither do you are anyone else.\n\nWhen people try to prove it what they find is that as they tighten up the experiment the ESP disappears which is a common characteristic of things which don't exist.
773163
Interesting...but is there truly any way to know for sure?  It's like the Shroud of Turin, there's so much controversy that the true science in it is lost.  I think that it's the general consensus that will influence the possibilities of orgin and usage (scary, huh).
180432
I find it interesting that the individual producing the time cube theory claims that mathematics (and by implication, all science other than what he/she approves) is nonsense has declared that set of opinions on a medium that required the mathematical and scientific work that the individual curses...  The internet, and its support technology, has been built and supported by the stuff this fellow decries.\n\nFrom my standpoint, that's like someone cursing farmers and cooks while eating...\n\nJust my opinion, of course.  I'm the embodiment of all that he or she anathematizes: so is modern medicine.  I wonder what the person would do if he/she got pneumonia or a nasty case of malaria?\n\nTo move into new territory, of course, you have to find new thoughts to think--I think it's one of Fudd's Laws: to find what no one else has found, you have to look where no one else has looked.\n\nWith that said, I have to disagree with the content of the site, and wonder about what there is in the author's background that causes such an attitude.  Certainly, there is a strong element of lack of knowledge: math and science, as they exist at this point in time, certainly embrace both singularity and plurality, and a great deal of other things.  They're not nearly so limited as the individual in that site seems to feel they are.\n\nOh, well...  Time to move on, or I shall ramble.
605339
This came from the documentary called Soldiers in the Army of God, about the anti-abortion extremists.  The guy was talking about how he found God while serving time in San Quentin prison for manslaughter and that God told him to circumcise himself with a razor blade, which he did.  The word NUTJOB comes to mind when you hear this garbage.  But what is scary about this is people actually BELIEVE stuff people like they say and back them.  Sorry, my first thought when someone says something like that isn't that it is a true conversion nor that God touched him the words DELUSIONAL DISORDER come to mind.  Followed closely by we are in SERIOUS trouble if people believe these things.
294037
Yes, I've seen it.  In fact, it's on my hard drive.\n\nThough it has a few good merits, it's still is what it is.. \n\nA Conspiracy Theory.
486183
I find it to be quite fascinating.  Although mind-bending as well (11 dimensions - my brain hurts just thinking about it).  I don't know if it is correct or not (well, no one knows for sure), but it seems to have potential, particularly with resolving the Relativity/Quantum Physics battle.