is there any who thinks that Iraq war is not a crime?
454000
Repugnicans think it's not, Democrats think it is.  I think it is.
43293
Not really, at least not towards its own citizens. I mean, genocide is mass-murder of people, and except for Iraq (where we've got insurgents attacking us the whole time), that's just not happening.\n\nTo niteboy : While our government is corrupt (on both political parties), we're not mass-murdering anyone (yet...)\nAnd just the fact we can post these things without getting in trouble shows we have some basic amount of freedom.
149688
sharon is war criminal but he did it for sake of his people. bush is war criminal but did it for sake of OIL MONEY POWER. \nnon of them is good.
611301
Fascinating. Thank you for bringing this up. It is a war crime. The whole of our involvement in Iraq then and now is full of war crimes. \n\nSeems there are no limits to the ugliness of our war. No wonder we are so despised.  \n\nThis is historic, our research with the A bomb was similar in nature; talk about opening Pandora's box...another result of fiddling with the atom. Some stuff should just be left alone.\n\nThe military has a history of testing horrible equipment and macabre medical treatments on soldiers as well as civilian populations. Just another day in the pentagon.
103347
I think it's kind of gone into a bad light. Although our punishment of bombing Afghanistan fit the crime (in my opinion), as time goes on people do forget what we were trying to accomplish there. And the war in Iraq (which I do not support nor condemn) is taking precedence over what our true cause was.
1172200
the "war on terror" is not a real war.\nit is like the "war on crime" you CAN'T BEAT THEM!\n\nas for bush, he should have been impeached after his first day in office. Al Gore won the 200 presidential election.\n\nBush is a war criminal. \n\nhis administration has openly totured people without giving them a fair trial, or even lawers. \n\nhe lead a pre-emptive war on false information, which he KNEW was flase before he made the announcement.\n\nhe has repeatively stepped over his heighth of power, over ruling other branches of the government.\n\nhe profits of the racist, bullsh*t war both politically and finacialy.
180248
Please notice that it is Iraq with Q not K.\nI am sure that this war will be finished as soon as things get setteled.\nThere's one more thing, personally I don't consider it as war against Iraq, it is war against terrorism, which is a part of the battle for freedom and democracy.
321587
I think it was totally right to go to war, mis-informed people argue otherwise. Do I think Iraq will be able to convert smoothly to a "democracy" state? No, it's not what their used to, they are used to a dictatorship of evil rule. If they like to be free, they will be, if they don't and prefer to live under a dictatorship then they will fight to do so. Promoting stability in Iraq is up to the people, not the war effort.
90617
no, letting people tell you it is, is the crime.
1143006
I am truly saddened by the number of people so willfully ignorant of the truth. The reasons for the Iraqi war, and the evidence about Iraq's WMD arsenals and programs is all over the web, out there for any minimally curious knowledge-seeker.\n\nYet, the web is still chock-full of fools who let others think for them and put words in their puppet mouths.\n\nHow sad. The world is turning into hysterical know-nothings.
742104
What amazes me is that most of the posts on here jumped on the ALLEGED rape, torture and murder case.  That's not what I read in the question at all.  I don't see anything about that case in this question.  It's funny how easy it was for everyone to jump all over a bad incident instead of finding the good.  That's much like our news.  We do good in Iraq everyday.  We never see that reported.  Let just one questionable thing happen and the news is all over it.  After that, you idiots are all over it like flies on sh*t.  Don't be so quick to judge and convict our military.\n\nFirst and foremost, EVERYONE is innocent until proven guilty.  There will be a trial for those accused of those crimes.  IF they are found guilty, they will be punished properly.  Since it's a military crime, they'll be punished more severely than any civilian ever is.  \n\nNow, in relation to the question, if someone from the military is on trial (being court martialed), there is doubt as to whether or not they did their job properly.  Yes, they are shot at and attacked on a regular basis.  However, there is proper procedure for how they're supposed to respond and handle the situation.  If there's doubts or questions to that, they'll be court martialed.  If they're innocent, they'll go back to their jobs and if guilty, they're punished by appropriate means to the crime.\n\nThe longer this war goes on, the more I have to agree, Americans are crazy.  They don't support their troops.  They believe every BAD piece of news reported.  They fall victim to all the propaganda out there.  You see it on Y! Answers all the time.  A question will be asked about Iraq and a soldier or famiy member will reply and other answerers will tell them they're lying or they just don't believe it.  Perfect example is when military says they are doing good in Iraq and it's not about oil and so on.  The general American public will argue tooth and nail, yet that miltary person is there and on the front line.  America is truly in a sad state right now.  \n\nI wonder, do they realize just how much their ignorance is tearing the country and military apart?!?!
76286
In no way is George Bush a crook. Just because you don't like him, doesn't make him less of a person.
924624
no they been doing it for years, its a war crime.
807001
You are right about most of the world (or at least normal people in it) realizing that wars don't solve problems in the world. But I don't think the assholes in the White House are able to think about diplomacy or beyond the concept of "using the American power" for the benefit of "the American people".
412719
The War was not "Legal", if any war could be justified in Law. Saddam was an Evil Dictator, but there are plenty of those in the World, some of the Allied to the USA (Hello Saudi Arabia!) There were no WMD's, but Loads of Oil, and no one seemed to have a clue what to do After we got rid of old Saddam. I think the Western powers did all they could to keep civilian casualties to a minimum, but I also believe that the USA and Britain went to war to secure a strategic resource, and for no other reason. 9/1 had nothing to do with Iraq, and that is a given. I think depending on the outcome History will judge the war as a naked show of aggression against a foreign power, with good or bad results. We will see.
1075770
I think its neither. Its a "War for oil" or War for wealth.
1176560
No, I am not surprised, it is pass the buck time, it should be George Bush that is arrested for conspiracy to commit murder for his illegal war in Iraq. But the foot solder will be the ones that pay the price. Bush will not as he has no morals.