WHat is a Hypothesized Relationship?
443660
Somebody made a hypothesis that says there is a relationship between thing A and thing B. A relationship does not say that A caused B or that B caused A, just that knowing about the state of A tells you something about the state of B. \n\nFor example, I could hypothesize that there is a relationship between people's stress levels and their body temperatures, but not be able to say that running a fever is the result of or the cause of stress.
204518
1. The branch of science that is concerned with the relationships between organisms and their environments.\n2. The relationship between organisms and their environments.\n3. The study of the detrimental effects of modern civilization on the environment, with a view toward their prevention or reversal through conservation.
501375
Theory is a set of facts, propositions, or principles analyzed in their relation to one another and used, especially in science, to explain phenomena. While hypothesis a tentative explanation for a phenomenon, used as a basis for further investigation.\n\nTherefore, theory is something that is a fact and that has been proven to be correct, while hypthesis is still on the process of observation and experimentation.
444813
A quotation by Harvey J Gold, Author of Mathematical Modelling of Biological Systems,  may go towards assisting your analysis of the situation:\n\n" The result of a mathematical development should be continuously checked against one's own intuition about what constitutes reasonable biological behaviour. Whenever such a check reveals disagreement, the following possibilities must be considered:\n\na : A mistake has been made in the formal mathematical development\n\nb: The starting assumptions are incorrect and/or constitute a too drastic oversimplification\n\nc: One's own intuition about the biological field is inadequately developed.\n\nd: A penetrating new principle has been discovered. "\n\nDo let me know whether you found meaning in the above, and if you did analyse your model based on the checks recommended by him, what among a,b,c,d was the reason of the discrepancy. Of course this is assuming that you have already established the discrepancy beyond doubt.
293216
A Harvard study measured chemicals in the brain during the first periods of a relationship and found them to be similar to people diagnosed with mental conditions.  Mine is still going strong (maybe it helps that I'm crazy anyway).
45101
Intertextuality is a relationship between two or more texts that quote from one another. Read more in wikipedia...
930330
As a BBA in general business....I would say no direct correlation exists.  This is if you are referring to general literature.\n\nAn indirect relationship exists in that literature will, over time, gradually change societies standards of what is right and wrong and business will sloooooowwwllllyyy follow suit.  (ie.  opinions on child labor...pensions and so forth).  Usually the course it takes is people start to think something is wrong...a few write their congressmen, and then there are a few news stories and then someone campaigns on a platform for child labor reform (for example) and the idea catches on and finally, after several years, a bill is passed and made into law that limits what hours and conditions children can work.
84949
I don't see the relation?
260821
labeling approach\nsymbolic interactionism\nrational choice\nrole theory
960714
relatedness, embeddedness, coordinating principle, correspondence, scientific parsimony, complementarity, and continuity.
456633
Hypothesis is your best guess as a prediction of the outcome of an experiment.  For example, I have 18 plants, all the same type of plant.  I separate into two groups.  They will get the same water, same sunlight, same air and temperatures for 3 weeks.  The groups will be separated by a sound-proof barrier. \n\nGroup A will have classical music playing, and Group B will have heavy metal playing, both at the same volume.  \n\nNow for the HYPOTHESIS: Group A will grow more and Group B will wither and suffer.  That is my best guess as to the effects of different types of music on plants.\n\nNow we carry out the experiment and see if your RESULTS match your HYPOTHESIS.  That is really the cornerstone of the scientific method.  Conclusions are drawn based on the results and how they correlated with the hypothesis.
332667
for semantics sake, thesis statements are used in research papers, whereas hypothesis is generally either in a science experiment or is after the conceptualization of your topic. But getting that mess aside... a good research question is "Are couples who meet through internet dating experiencing more satisfaction in their relationships/or are internet dating relationships more likely to survive the first 5 years of marriage. It may be difficult to research the 2nd as online dating is pretty recent, and the first may be limited by your ability to get responses from testimonials (self reporting is often flawed). But if either of these topics interest you, a working thesis statement would probably suggest that you find a higher/lower (depending on your findings) sustainability of commited relationships through internet dating than through more traditional dating methods.
1143661
the type of relationship\n das d
986369
In hypothesese you would usually try to keep it as far from using personal pronouns as possible so saying,\n'It is predicted that...' is usually a good way to start.\nAlso you can either do a one or two tailed hypothesis.\nExample of 1 tailed, 'It is predicted that people tend to have their first child between ages 23-28'\nExample of 2 tailed, 'It is predicted that people tend to have their first child either at age 24 or age 27'\n\nThe first example is probably better for your work here.\nTo be honest whenever I did coursework like this I did the research first and asked the questions then whatever I found out, I edited my hypothesis to back up my findings.\nJust try to make it fit what you find out and you cant go wrong :)\n\nGood luck on the coursework! x
713543
The scientific method involves the following basic facets:\n\n    * Observation. A constant feature of scientific inquiry.\n\n    * Description. Information must be reliable, i.e., replicable (repeatable) as well as valid (relevant to the inquiry).\n\n    * Prediction. Information must be valid for observations past, present, and future of given phenomena, i.e., purported "one shot" phenomena do not give rise to the capability to predict, nor to the ability to repeat an experiment.\n\n    * Control. Actively and fairly sampling the range of possible occurrences, whenever possible and proper, as opposed to the passive acceptance of opportunistic data, is the best way to control or counterbalance the risk of empirical bias.\n\n    * Falsifiability, or the elimination of plausible alternatives. This is a gradual process that requires repeated experiments by multiple researchers who must be able to replicate results in order to corroborate them. This requirement, one of the most frequently contended, leads to the following: All hypotheses and theories are in principle subject to disproof. Thus, there is a point at which there might be a consensus about a particular hypothesis or theory, yet it must in principle remain tentative. As a body of knowledge grows and a particular hypothesis or theory repeatedly brings predictable results, confidence in the hypothesis or theory increases.\n\n    * Causal explanation. Many scientists and theorists on scientific method argue that concepts of causality are not obligatory to science, but are in fact well-defined only under particular, admittedly widespread conditions. Under these conditions the following requirements are generally regarded as important to scientific understanding:\n\n        * Identification of causes. Identification of the causes of a particular phenomenon to the best achievable extent.\n        * Covariation of events. The hypothesized causes must correlate with observed effects.\n        * Time-order relationship. The hypothesized causes must precede the observed effects in time.
924570
an exception.some thing not consistent with an assumed  theory/relationship-in maths, a point of failure of the equation
131463
An interpersonal relationship is social relationship or connection between two or more people. \n\nExample:\nKinship relationships, including family relationships, being related to someone else by blood (consanguinity), e.g. fatherhood, motherhood; or through marriage (affinity), e.g. father-in-law, mother-in-law, uncle by marriage, aunt by marriage.