Why can't woman play Nfl if there manly enough?
441907
Are you FREAKING serious? Women cannot compete with men on an equal physical level - PERIOD. It's time to stop with all of that equality BS. Sure, women have the RIGHT to compete, but CAN they compete on an equal level? Absolutely not. Men are stronger, faster, etc. Do you actually believe the best WNBA team could beat the worst NBA team? Hell no, it would be a slaughter. They couldn't beat a COLLEGE men's team. Even among sports like sprinting or swimming or what have you, women's records are separate because they cannot beat men's times. I mean, let's get real. And the short answer to your question, if a woman COULD play to an NFL level, she would already be in the league.
82588
Ann Wolfe? Laila Ali? Sure, they could probably knock out plenty of men. However, if you put one of them against Jermaine Taylor or another male boxer at the top level, I doubt it. Women's boxing doesn't have enough competition for the fighters to be prepared for the people at the top of the men's division.
442014
You can try but I doubt you'll make it.  There are 250 lbs. men out there who have one thing on their minds, and thats knocking the nearest opposing player on his/her ass.  The sport is way too physical for a woman.
296028
Rugby, American football is for girls: all that padding and stuff! ;-)\n\nReal men play Rugby
216708
It's good to see a lady interested in football.  Most guys  love it when a woman enjoys and can talk football.\n\nThe team with the ball (Offense) gets 4 tries to move the ball at least 10 yards.  If they do, they get all their downs back again and will continue to try to move the ball to the endzone and score.  If they don't, then the other team gets the ball and it's their turn to try to advance the ball.\nIf the team hasn't moved the ball 10 yards by their 4th down, they will usually (almost always anyway) drop-kick (Punt) the ball to the other team.  They do this because most punts will go 40 to 50 yards and so that makes it that much farther the opposing team has to go to score.\n\n\nSome reasons why the the direction changes: (Just to simplify, let's call the team you like "The Browns" and the team you don't like "The Steelers".)\n\n1) Touchdown or Field Goal.\nExample: The Browns just scored a Touchdown.  \nAfter a score the Browns will kick off to the Steelers.  The Steelers run back the kick as far as they can.  It's now the Steelers turn on Offense and it's first down.\n\n2) Interception.  \nExample: Steelers on Offense and Browns on Defense.  \nThe Steelers attempt a pass and the Browns catch it instead, it is now the Browns ball and they switch to offense.  Brown's ball and 1st down.\n\n3) Fumble. \nExample:  Steelers on Offense and Browns on Defense.\nIf the Steelers player drops the ball while running with it and the Browns are able to get it, it is now the Browns ball and they switch to offense.  Browns ball and 1st down.\n\nWell these are some basics.  Hope it was helpful.
56516
for me womens play football is better than play Karate ot gong foo
308703
I have to agree with you.  If women were as good as men, would there be a need for them to have their own crappy leagues like the WNBA, LPGA (with closer tees), WTA, etc?  If women are just as good as men, shouldnt they be held to the same standards and compete in the same leagues, against men?  Im sure there is a very small number of women that could compete at that level, and they should be allowed to and welcomed.  But the opportunity to play professionally would disappear for a huge number of women if that was to come to pass.\nBy the way- there was a dude recently trying to play in the LPGA.  He said if women were going to play in the PGA and take up a man's spot in the tournament, the same thing should be allowed in the women's tour.  Women love it when another women tries to take on the men, they dont seem to like it nearly as much when the table gets turned on them.
853445
Women Physically in a sport on the average are not even close in performance to men. (Beyond Puberty)\nIt a simple fact of testosterone and muscle mass.\nTo say they are equal is silly.\nTo play them against each other is a very boring day for the bookies and the players, and potentially injurious to females.\nThere has to be a handicap or segregation or it simply isn't fun or fair to women.\nI'm not a misogynist. You just have to face reality.\nWomen are better and worse at some things because nature gives then different hormones and physic.
960279
Women would be able to wear the present uniform of footn&#92;ball but would have to add protective padding for the chest area. As far as attititude  there'd have to be a general turnaround in thinking of women as being  meek,breakable to them also being strong and aggressive since those are the qualities dominant in football. Women shouldn't have to do anything except play good football in order to be respected and taken serious in the sport.  What I wouldn't want to see is women football players copying the mannerisms, like grabbing behinds for example, of the male football players.When women enter a up until then a male dominated sport or career choice they should still  be women and not women attempting to play football  by acting like men
1062098
I am not sexist in any way, so dont think I am. The caliber of mens play compared to women is much higher. In some sports women do step up and get a chance to play in mens leagues, but usually end up giving up on that. In the sports that women played against men, such as hockey, with the tampa bay goaltender, she made the NHL, played one game and got smoked, she never tried to go back. Men have a more competitive nature and the body to back it up. Women are usually not built to be a big football or hockey player.  But some of them do what they can to get to the level they can play with the men. I dont know if they are trying to prove something or what. But the reason men sports are more popular is because more men watch sports than women. And a lot more men play sports then women, men are dominant in sports. Women do not get into sports as much. And there are also a lot of sexist guys out there that feel women should not play sports, which i think is ridiculous.
397576
Simply put, female athletes would not be able to compete with bigger, stronger males. Not to discredit the athletic ability of women. The sexes are built differently and men are favored in the athletic arenas requiring speed, power, and strength (though not necessarily in all sports- ultramarathons).
1096813
Because guys are obsessed w/ sports????\n\nAs a girl, there's nothing stopping you from playing.  In fact, you have an advantage.  Everyone's expectations of a girl's fantasy managerial skills might be pretty low.  If you do badly, no harm done & you regroup to try again next year.  If you kick some tail, you turned some heads & get some well deserved respect.  Nothing to lose.... not being chauvinistic, just giving a highly generalized opinion.
1113785
This question is asked almost every 24 hours. But it's never been by a man.... I wonder why.... Yeah. This idea is good enough. Should be done. But.... How many people would try out for Quarterback? How many for o-line? There in lies the problem. In balancement.
1171411
I dont want to say you cant.. cause we can do all things...\nBut a leader cant lead you to where they have never been...\nWith men this is especially true... especially in a sport like football\nyou can do it in basketball and volleyball easily\nbut to get a boy to hit... you have to be able to hit\nto getg a boy to run a pattern you better know how to do it\nwhat you want from those who follow you \nYou have to be able to do it to\nYou cant tell a person to take  a hit if you have never been hit by a 300lb lineman or a saftey barreling down at you full speed...\nIf you havent been down in the trenches dont bother tellin a man to dig that hole... cause u need to know how to dig it yourself...\n\nI didnt want to sound sexist or anything but thats how life even with other women you will meet the same challenge... Lead when you have been led...
37464
Baltimore: Last Stand of the Cheer-Hunk \n(pic. not available here)  \nTitans cheer-hunk Lonnie will have to be shirtless somewhere else.    \nThe Tennessee Titans, one of the two NFL teams to offer cheer-hunks as well as cheer-babes -- Baltimore is the other -- have just decided to eliminate male cheerleaders. Supposedly this is owing to "liability concerns," because the men were tossing the women into the air during stunt routines. But don't the male cheerleaders toss the female cheerleaders into the air at every college game in the country, without litigation? How come every college in the country can handle this maneuver but the Tennessee Titans can't? \n\nTuesday Morning Quarterback has mixed reactions to the news from Nashville. Being a traditionalist, I think it's incredibly important to uphold the tradition of gawking at buff, half-naked cheer-babes. So as long as the women's squads are not threatened, the cheer institution is safe. But consider the NFL's ever-growing contingent of female fans: surely they have an equal right to gawk at ripped cheer-hunks. And what about nontraditional male fans? You might counter that women and nontraditional men have the players themselves to gawk at. But the players are, distressingly, fully clothed. \n\nHere is the Titans' 2003 cheerleading unit. Kiss the guys goodbye. \n\nAnd to think this could happen when the president of the United States, George W. Bush, is a former college male cheerleader.
1100630
I think it depends on the sport.  I personally don't like a female calling my football games.  However, for softball or baseball it makes good sense & I like it.
518182
man have a problem competing with women and losing.they feel their particular sport is their own escape and have a hard time accepting women in their sport.