is BUSH a terrorist??
446298
Yes, with a large amount of assistance.
1007427
He hit Islam?, Believe he did not hit sh*t, or you mean "hate"?. Believe me, Bush may hit/hate groups/organizations, but not a religion, THAT IS A RISK.
455889
Bush is a uniformed terrorist.\n\nBin Laden is trying to fight against the unjust laws of US, The double standards, racism and discrimination.\n\nPeople think Bin Laden is a terrorist which he is not.\nPeople think Bush is not a terrorist which he is.
519418
what is terrorism ?\nand who is the terrorist ?\nand who is can judge that if this man or the other one is  a terrorist or not ?\n\nanyway ... Iraq war is the beginning of the End Of USA !!\n\ni wish that the west media show some real videos and news from Iraq\n\nlike the yesterday video that show the mujaheddin bomb a base for the US troops and kill 40 solider :)\n\n" VIVA LA RESISTANCE "
189479
i think not.he just wants to support bush either because of their alliance or because he's scared of him....
173262
does anyone like bush??
1174410
Theyre both terrorists..Bin Laden planned and executed his paln to bomb us and it was a horrible thing...Bush is having troops injure innocent people and families that have nothing to do wiht somewhat of his personal war..both are TERRORISTS
696713
Dude i'm totally with you. Can you believe the complete moron above me saying that hes gonna stock up on ammo to fight terrorists here? Haha! LOOK AT WHOS FAULT IT WILL BE! If Bush never went to Iraq, the number of terrorists in the world would be a FRACTION of what it is now! If anyone is to blame for any future terrorist attacks, it's Bush's flawed methods of "democracy" because if anything, because of him we now have an exponentially larger amount of enemies. thank god its his last term
1141977
We are not winning the "war against terror" all because we made so many enemies that it is hard to figure out who is the terrorist and who is not.  Bush on the other hand; don't even know who is the terrorist because if he did; we wouldn't be in Iraq at the present moment.  The truth is we are our own terrorist and the reason I said this is because how many times do we hear someone American is blowing up something or trying to blow up something?  How many times do we hear about American killing American which goes on everyday of our lives?  I mean who is the real terrorist to us?  We can't control our own people in the USA so how do we figure that we can control someone else in another country?  No one is really winning the "war against terror or terrorist".
841110
Amen! Bush not only is a mass murder, but also a hypocrite!!\n\nPeaCe*
21797
Bush is not spying on people he's spying on suspected terrorists.  Truely no one in their right mind would want our security forces to ignore a call from Osama directly into the USA?  \n\nDemocrats need to suspend their hate of all things republican and pretent for the moment that the president is Clinton.  If you would be ok with clinton securing your borders by investigating terrorists then pls drop the sky is falling attitude.
119597
Bush wants to wiretap Americans on a wild goose chase for terrorists - yet he allows 6 ports to be placed under the operational control of a company from UAE, home to 2 of the 9/11 hijackers.\n\nGee, yeah, Bush is doing "a heck of a job".
283312
YES HE IS. BUSH IS LIVING LA VIDA LOCA at the expense of the american people.  He is a shiit for brains mediocre piece of president.  He is not even a full man.  He was raped as many members of the Skull and Bones society are, and that's why we call him now Baby Bush or Bushy for cute. \n\nDo you know what's his favorite entertainment now? Playing with Cheney to see who farts louder and longer in the oval room when the CIA recorders are rolling.  Sometimes they soil themselves and call the White House aid to clean saying it was the dog.  Yeah, right. And they didn't even consider James Brown or Eddie Murphy for president.  They would have done better.
869330
excuse me, but havent we all learned that what President Bush says, and what is actual reality are not always in AGREEMENT. Just because he INSINUATES that the terrorists are happy (like a typical sore loser) does not mean it's true. The terrorists have been killing Americans regardless of who is in office. It doesn't matter.\n\nYOU TELL BUSH TO STAY AWAY FROM MY CHEESE PUFFS. How dare he...
453378
George Bush\n\n      Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. - US Federal Bureau of Investigation\n\nRead the sentence carefully. You didn’t hear it on any corporate media newscast since 9/11. It’s the official US FBI definition of terrorism.  In its official definition, the FBI does not limit terrorism to stateless individuals or groups. In its official definition, the FBI does not suggest that terrorism cannot be perpetrated by the leader of a nation state. But even more amazing is that the official FBI definition of terrorism describes exactly what George Bush did in the aftermath of the attacks of 9/11!\n\nAPPLYING THE DEFINITION\n\n    *\n      George W. Bush, in his unprovoked attack against the sovereign nation of Iraq, openly violated the UN Charter, to which the US is a signatory.  The Charter's core principles contained in Article 2(4) and Article 51 prohibit one nation from attacking another except in self-defense or with the authority of the U.N. In effect, George Bush launched an unlawful use of force against persons and property.\n    *\n      The invasion launched by George W. Bush was heralded by the most frightening and powerful use of force and military violence in recent history. His Shock and Awe bombardment of Baghdad was designed to intimidate and coerce the government as well as the civilian population of that nation to change its existing leadership. That, in itself, was a political objective.\n    *\n      The purpose of the invasion and ensuing occupation of Iraq was to replace the existing dictatorship with an American-backed form of democracy that would not permit the emergence of a government headed by the majority Shia religious leadership.  These motives were unquestionably political and social.\n\nSo, what part of the FBI definition of “terrorism” do the voters of the United States not understand?  And what acts of terrorism as defined by the FBI do the voters of the United States not recognize?  Is there any doubt at all that the Bush administration committed acts of terrorism when it unlawfully used force and violence against the nation of Iraq to intimidate and coerce its government and the civilian population, in furtherance of the Bush/PNAC political and social objectives.\n\nTherefore, by any definition, if George W. Bush is guilty of terrorism, he can accurately be identified as a TERRORIST. And if he is truly a terrorist, it is only fitting that George W. Bush be scrutinized in terms of his success in that capacity.  What is his standing among the other murderous terrorist activity in the world today?  Is it possible that George W. Bush actually has claim to being the very BEST at something during his reign in office?
576774
Maybe he had an inkling about some terrorist activity, but I doubt he knew of the specifics, details, timings and such stuff.\n\nNo sane person would permit such a thing to happen, especially a president of a country, at least that's what common sense  reasoning tells me.\n\nUnfortunately, Bush is a man of about average or less than average intelligence,  and even if he did get some clues, he'd probably add em wrong like he did about Iraq's nukes. \n\nMaybe you Americans among the answerers' know more than I do about this.\n\nst
1049509
Do you have a particular reason for asking this?  Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist and Bush is a President.  It is a difficult question as disliking one does not include liking the other.  I dislike Osama for many reasons much more serious that the ones I have for disliking President Bush. Likewise, I have some sense of patriotism that nudges me to help support our president from a national point-of-view when I think it appropriate.  While, at the same time, I have nothing but ill-will towards Al Quaida and other groups that take the beautiful religion of Islam and slander it to create hate around the world.