Is better the super bowl in more than 1 game?
446037
its better money wise\n\nevery body watches that game because its the last game and it makes it get more $$$$ but it gives teams only 1 chance and if ther havin' a bad game their screwed
545869
It actually was added in 2002 I believe they have had one every year since or almost every year since. Orginally the Superbowl was played the last week of January. On that schedule sometimes you would have 5 Sundays in Jan. so if you had 5 then there would be a bye week. In 2002 there wasn't going to be one. The problem was the canceled week. So they had to push it up a week with the rest of the schedule. Well the stadium was already booked for that week. So they had to delay it a week.
1139270
no it shouldn't be because unlike tennis and american football, football is 90 minutes nearly non-stop.  if they were to introduce instant replay, they would have to stop the game and make the game at least half an hour longer than it is now.  things aren't perfect, and if you lose because of a ref's mistake, take it.  chances are it's happened to the team you just played before too
908145
yes but it's only chiefs vs. broncos
879188
Not everywhere else shows 2 NFL games on Sundays. \n\nIt really depends on a number of factors. One could be the team which is closest to your market. For example, I live in Middle Tennessee, so I always get to watch the Tennessee Titans games. Usually, that means I'll have a doubleheader on CBS and a single game on Fox or vice versa.\n\nOr, it could be you have a crappy network that doesn't realize that the more games they show, the better ratings will be.
594085
Well, if its two on one, then I think that the team of two would win. You get more ground coverage and conserve more energy.
51516
Read this\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl
927801
After a week of NFL games where nothing was predictable....NYJ beating New Eng, Favre wins in the dome, Indy sneaks by Buff, ATL losses to Cle, etc....I am looking for tonight's game to be more predictable.  Carolina is the superior team, they have also had the last two weeks plus to get ready for this game.  CAROLINA 27-13
805436
Well, actually like some of the other answers, I find myself enjoying the games more because there's more on the line than just NFL standings.  I'm a huge GB Packers fan, so I usually only cared about their games and whether or not the Bears and Vikings lost.  Now, however, I find myself interested in almost every game that is being played.  Yes, like you mentioned, it is kinda frustrating when my WR watches a 60 yard td catch slip through his fingers or an RB fumbling on the one yard line before he scores a td....but makes NFL games that much more interesting because so much more is riding on the games than just rooting for my home team.
1002316
I don't think the Superbowl winner makes a big deal out of being 'world' champs.  \n\nEach NFL team is from a US city, so the game is not "the USA versus the USA" - it's more a case of San Francisco versus New York.  See the difference?\n\nWould be cool someday to see a Superbowl where New York played Paris or Tokyo...
771608
Yep!!!!  Another way to exclude 75% of the country from great football games every week.  I say, put it on CBS, NBC, or FOX, so those of us with out NFL Network, or even cable, can enjoy a nice thursday night game.
798328
Money Money Money is your answer\n\nThe first time the Super Bowl was played in February was 2002, following the 2001 season.  There was a week that was cancelled after 9/11, which pushed the Regular season back a week, therefore pushing the playoffs back as well.  \n\nMore recently, the NFL has shyed away from having their opening weekend be the same weekend as Labor Day.  That way, the NCAA can have their own big opening weekend bash, then the NFL can follow suit a week later.  Both of which allow for more money to be made by each organization.  That pushes the start of the NFL season more towards mid September, throw in the 17 week schedule, and your regular season takes you right up to, if not into the new year.  They tinkered with cutting out the week between the conference championships and the Super Bowl, but again, that didnt leave them enough time to get things together for the teams or fans, not to mention that it allows the NFL to make more money off the event.  \n\nHope this helps!
496759
I went to SuperBowl 28 when it was here in Atlanta, the Dallas Cowboys defeated the Buffalo Bills 30-13. I remember it was the loudest I had ever heard the GA dome, and it was great to see so many different people cheering for the Cowboys in Atlanta. I also went to SuperBowl 34, which was also here in Atlanta, the Rams and the Titans played. I thought the Titans got cheated in that one, from the stands, it looked like their last throw was a touchdown, but i remember every Titans fan being upset that night. The half time shows are awesome, even though we didnt get any Janet Jackson action.
998106
Only one.\n\nI think it's called football.
174606
Interesting, different info than I figured.  Depends on how you look at it--for one event, the Super Bowl, followed by soccer and F1 racing.  Link has a lot more info:
47225
Hey, I thought the Browns played some really competitive games this year! But yes the steelers are much better!
666738
1.that damn Steelers and Colts game was the superbowl if you ask me\n2.Redskins and Dallas the blood feud...the redskins showing you just how blown up the weak cowboys really are (blown out)...poor punter\n3. that chiefs game that was won in the last seconds when they choose to go for it.. instead of the tie(QB greens dad had died the day before)\n\n4. i hate to bring this up but the rose bowl!!!!! run!!! vince!! run!!!\n\n5. but the most satisfying game was the dynasty ender bowl with the pats and the Broncos...it hushed the pats fans up till the off season started