who has the greater position the emperor or the king?
453970
An emperor is ruler of an empire whereas a king is the ruler of a kingdom. While their powers are almost the same within their land,the title of an emperor is more prestigious.
112013
nope.\n\nthey have an Emperor.
1046782
China. The Yellow Color was the Imperial Color. No other person was allowed to wear yellow because of its relation to Gold. In fact, Chinese emperors were called Hoang Thun, which meant Gold Ruler. Thats also why they have the Huang He, (The Yellow River).\n\nHope that helps!
357371
Vegeta.\n\nThe Prince of All Saiyans.\n\nSure, Goku may be more powerful but Vegeta is much cooler.
439478
I would say Obi-Wan Kenobi. Because he bested Anakin in a lightsaber battle. He was tempted by Count Dooku to join the dark side but he refused. Anakin however joined it. Who is better the " The Chosen One " or the one who beat him?
18729
The Return of the King
199347
Junichiro Koizumi is the current Prime Minister of Japan.\n\nNote: Like the Queen of England, the Emperor of Japan is not the head of the Japanese Government but merely a figurehead.
592764
there are different versions...\n\na lot of historians believe that the first monarch was the leader of the militia, and he had a military power, and he declared himself to be the king...\n\nsome people believe, that in addition to the military power, economic power (better governance of land etc.) also played role...\n\nIn roman empire - when there was democracy, then it became aristocracy with senate and different officials.  and when the northern tribes began attacking the borders the emperor (in ancient Rome it was the post of commander-in-chief) passed a statute through Senate that he will combine several posts (emperor, consul etc.) after several emperors, one decided, that the post should be inheritable, and after that, another one decided he needs no senate... and ROME became tyranny and after it was destroyed... :-)   classical example of birth and death of monarchy.\n\nhistory knows examples, that some monarchs were elected... like Romanov family in Russia was elected through convents of the Nobles... and after that the rules of succession worked.\n\nby the way, those rules of succession are different in different countries... it can be that the eldest child, or the eldest son, or the eldest male (like cousins, uncles etc - in case when there are no sons) etc.\n\nIn some countries (like United Arab Emirates) the monarch is elective (between so called Emirs).\n\nanyway - most of historians belive that the factor of force (especially military one) played a key role
927740
He's Jesus, not a Sith Lord.\n\n(Yoda vs. Jesus.   Hmmm....)
688609
The Queen is more respected, so it would be her.
362660
Depends, IN America, the head of state is President. He hold the final power of desicion making. He is the head of legislative and excutive.\nIN ENGLAND, the head of state is Prime Minister, he take all the meetings working, and give information to his King(Queen). Prime Minister make the desicion, but act under the signature of QUEEN. Prime Minister is head of excutive not the head of legislative.
566199
The position of Pope of the holy Roman empire.
764141
the Prince Consort\n\nor King if he is the ruler
670597
Derived from Latin "The one who Reigns", the Queen
257090
He was the second Mauryan emperor of India. He was son of Chandragupta Maurya and the father of Ashoka the Great.\n\nThe correct spelling is Bindusara. See the Wikipedia article.
458217
there were the:\nEmperor who ruled the entire empire which he conquered or inherited from his father.\nunder the emperor were the priests from his religion which were almost like his right hand perosn if they were in favor with the emperor.\nunder him were people called satrapps which ruled parts of his empire,\n then under him were people that controlled cities and little villages almost like mayors.
535361
King. Before the Magna Carta screwed it all up. :)