Why are certain people calling for the removal of Donald Rumsfeld?
439392
Because he has ignored the recommendations of the generals, despite the fact that he has little military command experience aside from being Secretary of Defense. The person leading the military knows next to nothing about military campaigns, and despite that, he does not rely on his generals to make his decisions, but rather what is best for the administration.
741291
That is a very good question. Bush put him there so that's way up in the air. Time will tell. \nIt seems very odd, that the day after elections, Rumsfeld steps down. Makes me wonder why he's cutting and running. I think Maliki's call for us to keep troops on the ground in Iraq, Saddam's death sentence, and Rumsfeld's resignation are closely tied. I have a feeling there will be more fallout to come in the next few months. Rice? Cheney? Or with any luck, Bush? I suppose that would be asking too much.
942154
They do seem to have a desire to bring our country down. There just isn't any logic to their madness------yes they will still continue to lay a mile of snot for any illogical cause.
764826
Come again?\n\nDo you mean Rumsfeld's replacement?
983248
Funny how the political hacks on the Republican side never mention the influential Republicans who have criticized this mess. There are a lot of Republicans who are furious at how Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush have run the war. Senator Chuck Hagel, a decorated vet and the much respected Senator Warner of Virginia come to mind. These guys know what they're talking about.
1011107
They are only looking out for their OWN interests,and that of the businesses that funded their campaigns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\n They are NOT upholding the constitution of the United States,and MOST of them should be removed from office!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
376949
I believe that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld needs to resign. While in office, his vision for the military simply does not jibe with reality. His concept of "transformation" means cutting down troop levels, purchasing a ton of gold plated fly boy toys, and letting the military-industrial complex (and private military companies) get hold of the taxpayers' hard earned money.\n\nThe perception of Rumsfeld is that with superior technology, America can defeat any opponent, unconventional and conventional. This is evident in the emphasis on technology as opposed to doctrine and training. However, as Col. Boyd (who developed the concept of OODA) once said, "People, ideas, hardware, in that order!" One must remember that in Vietnam, we had superior technology, but we could not entirely eliminate the NVA and VC after how many years of combat (though the VC was decimated after the Tet Offensive). In Korea, the Chinese were able to surprise the UN & US and drive them back, after managing to conceal their entire divisions from the UN/US air patrols. Americans must realize that technology may be a force multiplier, but cannot be relied on too much to fight wars. History has proven time and time again that excellent strategy, training, and quality warriors will always turn the tide of the war while technology helps (and hinders as well). One must also look at Iraq and see what is the major killer of our warriors. IEDs. These IEDs are relatively inexpensive, and are able to defeat our hundred thousand dollar uparmored HUMVEEs and even our million dollar M1A2 Abrams tank. RPGs can take down our helicopters. Why is it that the enemy can find a low cost and effective solution and we cannot? And about the Army's planned brigade combat teams... it guts maneuvering elements (and counts the reconnaisance battalion as a maneuvering element) while enlarging headquarters. Being flexible is important, but this BCT concept on the surface seems to make it more flexible, but in reality makes it less flexible. With less maneuvering elements and a bloated headquarters, it becomes more slower and inefficient.\n\nNot to mention, his performance for the invasion of Iraq was unacceptable. Despite the warnings and objections from the professional generals (about troop levels, post-war planning, etc), he decided to go ahead anyways. Now we are stuck fighting an insurgency in an effort to stabilize Iraq.
648816
Rumsfeld is an absolute CRIMINAL. He should be relieved of duty, along with that W guy. The rich guy from Wyoming needs to go, too...
854612
no one wants hatred between anyone but if its the truth then it ought to come out.  it probably happens a lot more than we know it just doesn't make it to the front page like this one did. putin certainly had his reasons for wanting to shut the guy up and putin is ex-spy himself...did he do it probably will he pay for it, probably not.
1129659
Good question.  If so many people don't think he's doing a good job as president, doesn't our constitution allow us to get rid of him?  I don't think as many people disapprove of him as it may seem.  The media sure makes it seem that way though.  I think people just say they disapprove of him because it's the social norm.  I might not agree with everything Bush does, but I trust that he always does what he thinks is best for our country.  And who can blame him for that?
790925
it's a sign he's insane, the repubs would love to get rid of both of them, they could groom a new V.P. for 08 & blame the quagmire in iraqistan on the departed rummy but neither will go quietly, they know where the bodies are buried.
843632
I heard all the talk, they try to make you feel that you are a rat jumping from a sinking ship. At least the Democrats want to set a timetable to get out of Iraq. I feel this is a good idea. One it would force the new leader in Iraq to get his police force in line.
604120
I've had a long day, so I'm just going with: Because they're f*cking morons with no grounds for impeaching Bush. And yes, they think their constituents are stupid. After all, they were the ones who put them in office. Switched parties? Hell, no. We don't want them.
619107
He is still in his position because President Bush wants him there. \n\nTo fire Rumsfeld is to admit that things in Iraq have been bungled and that mistakes were made. Its also a sign that Bush second guessed himself and his decisions. \n\nBush never admits or owns up to a mistake. This is one of many reasons he's a weak leader. Leaders can admit when they make mistakes, and they quickly take action to correct them. Bush just can't admit he made a huge mistake with Iraq. \n\nIn his administration, loyalty is more important than competence. \n\n(And yes, Rumsfeld is an a$$.)
962582
There is alot of hatred and most stems from the Gore/Bush campaign.They made a premature call of the election and tried to discredit our military votes by taking it to court to have them thrown out of the count because they were a few days late coming in from overseas.Instead of debating an issue its easier for them to name call.Ie,they called our president Hitler,called conservatives Nazi's and call our troops terrorists..,thank you howard dean,yet they wonder why President Bush doesnt want to work with them?It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
930543
Rove, Bush and Cheney motivated me. The trashing of Veteran Heroes over the years got to be too much. It just shows the lengths they will go to, to get elected. Like these guys were war heroes or something.Then they have the balls to talk about patriotism. I'm getting pissed again.\nCan't stomach the hypocrisy.
384467
Absolutely, Rumsfeld is old and has no clue whats going on, a new fresh of eyes and opinions, and someone with Keen military strategy. someone who knows how to work within the branches and work them togetther for a tactical approach. we need to reestablish what the goals are and who is being targeted. rummy has got to go....