Sigmund Freud and hus Freudian Slip?
448119
As far as Freud is concerned, cocaine has nothing to do with him being stable or not (used it for a brief period of time). At his time cocaine was perscribed widely as a euphoric (they even used it in toothpaste and it is a well known fact that Coke was named after the drug as it was actually an ingredient at the time). Freud was fascinated by this 'new' drug and was studying its use in medicine(published in his papers 'on cocaine'). An acquaintance of his, Koller (an opthalmologist) conducted research after hearing Freud talk about cocaine's effects and presented the 'discovery' of the substance's use as a local anaesthetic as his own, thus gaining reputation.However, eventually the side effects and addictive nature of cocaine were discovered and Koller's reputation destroyed. \nAs for Freudian slips, i do believe the theory behind it. What you said has happened to me quite a bit. Even if the meaning behind the slip is not apparent (yes when you intended to say no but actually mean yes ect) and it's something seemingly irrelevant, it should correspond to something in your preconscious or unconscious. The actual word that you utter in a slip is not always the one directly related to the unconscious. Instead it has been 'filtered' by means of distortions due to the heavy affective load of the original word (which is what made it unconscious in the first place). An example would be a slip that is associated to a word or feeling that you find unacceptable. \nHowever, when something is said consciously, not 'accidentally', it is not considered a slip. So if you say something, even if the next second you regret saying it and take it back, it is not a slip of the tongue. If you say to someone "I hate you" it probably means you do even if you say that you didn't mean it, but this does not exclude the possibility that you love them as well. We always have opposing feelings for people if you think about it. It's just that one or the othe predominates.
460869
"Social Psychology, as the writer conceives it, studies the psychic planes and currents that come into existence among men in consequence of their association." That is, it must confine itself to the "uniformities in feeling, belief, or volition -- and hence in action -- which are due to the interaction of human beings." Here we find a certain field of human experience cut off from the rest, because men and women influence each other within that field. There result certain uniformities from this interaction and this makes the subject matter of the science of social psychology. In the same manner one might investigate the psychology of mountain tribes because they are subject to the influence of high altitudes and rugged landscape. Sociality is for Professor Ross no fundamental feature of human consciousness, no determining form of its structure.\n\nCitation: George Herbert Mead. "Social Psychology as Counterpart to Physiological Psychology", Psychological Bulletin 6 (1909): 401- 408.\n\n\nPERSONALITY TRAITS: THEIR CLASSIFICATION AND MEASUREMENT [1]\nBy Floyd H. Allport & Gordon W. Allport (1921)\nFirst Published in Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 16, 6-40. \n\n\nA QUARTER CENTURY OF PSYCHOLOGY IN AMERICA: 1878-1903.\nBy Edward Franklin Buchner\nUniversity of Alabama.\n\nFirst published in American Journal of Psychology, 14, 666-680.[*]
1098077
First Student A stays out all night partying (first step), Student A then goes to class the next morning and gets a mind cramp due to pop quiz (compaction factor).  Student A then, totally fried and unable to pull anything out of his cramped brain, slumps down in his seat (slump factor) which causes him to nod off. \n \nResults of the sieve analysis show that  Step 1 (partying all night) leads to mind cramping (thus, losing all facts relevant to test leak out of mind like water through a sieve) resulting in total slump in posture and responsiveness of Student A.
148153
The confrontation of the West with Communism, Strauss wrote in The City and Man, has demonstrated that "no bloody or unbloody change of society can eradicate the evil in man: as long as there will be men, there will be malice, envy and hatred, and hence there cannot be a society which does not have to employ coercive restraint." Strauss implies, among other things, that the extravagant hope for permanent progress in human affairs believed in by Woodrow Wilson and his contemporary admirers is a delusion. In particular, Strauss wrote, the ideal of "a universal state, unitary or federative" (Strauss appears to be speaking of the United Nations) is also a delusion. "If that federation is taken too seriously," said Strauss, "as a milestone on man's onward march toward the perfect and hence universal society, one is bound to take great risks supported by nothing but an inherited and perhaps antiquated hope, and thus to endanger the very progress one endeavors to bring about."\n\nTo begin with, then, according to Strauss each nation should conduct its own foreign policy, and it should not turn its policy over to international organizations. In current parlance, Strauss was a unilateralist, not a multilateralist.\n\nread more at the link below
497658
I think Freud was really on something alright... just kidding.\n\nI really love my genitals.  I have an awesome vulva and kick a$$ breasts.  I'm super hot :-)
358279
Still with the whole Sohcahtoa deal, but one, despite my old schools wishes, worked best.\n\nwords to remember || [function] *** over ***\n\nSome old hippie || [sin] opposite hypotenuse\nCaught another hippie || [cos] adjacent hypotenuse\nTripping on acid || [tan] opposite adjacent\n\nEach time I see a right triangle, "Some old hippie, caught another hippie, tripping on acid" rings in my head.
1176790
http://www.psychology.soton.ac.uk/psyweb/staff/myprofile/mypublications/publications/jsteven/sonugabarke%20psychol%20med.pdf
147104
according to psychoanalytic theory, our refulated uncounscious desires and drives(usually sexual and aggressive ones)penetrate through dreams, a reason why part of the psychanalytic therapy relies on dream interpretation, trying to link the latent content to the manifest one.\nas far as my knowledge reaches, i think nowadays, knowing the fact that during the rem sleep our cerebral activity is similar to the one in the waking state, dreams are more likely to be images and situations which have troubled us during the day (or the past days) and which are somehow reintegrated into an entirely free "imaginary space" which lacks the boundaries of a syntax, as language does.
611888
The link below is a pretty good analyzes of the two with out favoring one or the other.  It was written in a method that even I can understand so you should be fine ;-)
298357
What did Freud have to say about homosexuality? \n\nFor those who don't know, Freud among other professional dignitaries signed a statement, in 1930, which called for the repeal of the law penalizing homosexual relations between "consenting adult males." \n\nIn 1930 Freud again spoke in the Vienna public press on the subject of homosexuality. This time he appeared as a co-signatory to a statement addressed to a joint Austro-German legal commission which was considering the revision of the penal code. Among the other signatories were Artur Schintzler, Franz Werfel, and Moritz Schlick. The statement noted that the commission was reported as deadlocked over a proposal to repeal Paragraph 175, the law penalizing hosexual relations between "consenting adult males." But the deadlock should be broken. "Humanity, justice and reason" all required the repeal, and it should be agreed to immediately. "Homosexuality," the statement continued, had "been present throughout history and among all peoples." The laws which penalized it represented an "extreme violation of human rights" \n\nSigmund Freud's basic theory of human sexuality was different from that of Ellis. He felt that all human beings were innately bisexual, and that they become heterosexual or homosexual as a result of their experiences with parents and others (Freud, 1905). Nevertheless, Freud agreed with Ellis that a homosexual orientation should not be viewed as a form of pathology. In a now-famous letter to an American mother in 1935, Freud wrote: \n"Homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but it is nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation, it cannot be classified as an illness; we consider it to be a variation of the sexual function produced by a certain arrest of sexual development. Many highly respectable individuals of ancient and modern times have been homosexuals, several of the greatest men among them (Plato, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, etc.). It is a great injustice to persecute homosexuality as a crime, and cruelty too.... \n\n"If [your son] is unhappy, neurotic, torn by conflicts, inhibited in his social life, analysis may bring him harmony, peace of mind, full efficiency whether he remains a homosexual or gets changed...." (reprinted in Jones, 1957, pp. 208-209, from the American Journal of Psychiatry, 1951, 107, 786). \n\n1905:  Freud Invents Sexuality\n\nIn his 1905 Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality Sigmund Freud invented the idea of sexuality is a process independent of an individual's sex.  Thinkers before Freud from Ulrichs to Westphal to Krafft-Ebing believed that most men are born "normal" (i.e. heterosexual) but that male inverts inherit some female mental characteristic that makes them sexually attracted to members of their own sex.  Freud rejected the idea and argued that the direction the sexual drive takes has no necessary relationship to inherited sexual characteristics. \nInstead, Freud theorized, all children are born polymorphously perverse - their sexual desires can be drawn toward any object - and it is their childhood experiences that cause their sex drive to be directed to members of the opposite or the same sex.  Freud did not condemn homosexuals or other "perverts" and he was skeptical that homosexuality could be cured, but Three Essays continued the psychiatric tradition of labeling non-heterosexual sexuality "perversions" and "aberrations".  One section of the book even gives child-rearing tips to help parents lead their children to "normal" heterosexual adjustment.\n\nSince Freud rejected hereditarian theories of the causes of homosexuality, he also rejected the notion that homosexuals or inverts are necessarily feminine.  According to Freud, whether a boy grows up to have a masculine or feminine personality has nothing to do with the direction of his sexual desire.  Thus, depending on
48938
Nah. While they were decent theories a hundred years ago, most of his ideas have been shown to be pretty much junk science. For example, dreams are now thought of more as random stuff in your brain, rather than reflecting the inner subconscious of your hidden desires.\n\nAnother thing I disagree with is his extreme sexualization of behavior. For example, Freud believed that from the beginning of human life, we are sexual creatures, and actually labeled our stages of development as oral/anal/phallic/latent. Wow. He was also rather derogatory toward women, but that kinda fits with the attitude of that age.\n\nYet another problem is Freud studied mental patients, and then expected that their patterns of behavior would be similar to the general public. He did very little actual experimentation.\n\nOn the flip side, he really was the first to suggest a subconscious that we're not fully aware of, a very important idea even now. And he did practially establish the field, so we have to give him some credit :)
1174667
I found the idea of this story quite intriguing and I have tried hard to find it but I can't think of any other way to search for it.  What is the "7407 course"?  Do  you have any way of contacting someone who has done it or who teaches it?  I think that's what I would try.\n\nI've included a few sites that you have probably already seen about misinterpreting gestures, but maybe they will be of some help.
30140
I'm not sure there's any scientific basis for it, but simply from what I've seen on TV lately, the answer is yes.  Very yes.  I used to be a big TV junkie, but I've spent the last few weeks reading Moby Dick and Shakespeare plays.  It's not easy, but I feel much more cultured because of it.\n\n\nOh, this is nice.  One of greatest works of the 19th century and I can't say it because it's a synonym for penis.  I'm losing my faith in the internet as well.
876318
Someone's been reading Ursula K. Le Guin.   Interesting stuff...have a look at Left Hand of Darkness if you haven't already read it.\n\nDo you mean gender, a sociological construct, or sex, a physical one?  If you mean gender, well, get a big pitcher and some pizza and several good friends, because it's a long discussion in the making.
890632
Well, Freud did confirm that all humans are inherently bisexual.  All that means is that we have the capability to have sexual contact with either sex.  I think this is more of a factor during childhood when personal exploration and puberty are in full swing.  My opinion:  If someone's got "gay tendencies" and is in a heterosexual and monogamous relationship, they need to either be honest with themselves or remain faithful to their main choice.  \n\nAs far as the lesbian factor behind a porno...I personally would rather see male/female action so I can envision myself in the guy's place.  But I don't necessarily think that's an indication of me wanting to DO the guy.
575181
It's Freudian, possibily a repressed Id (That's Id) \nNOT I, D,entification, Go get laid, Honestly, It's a deep Rooted desire to be taken.
1018581
I'm also writing a thesis,but in Theories of New Media, and I'm very much involved in Theories of Perception. Anyway, I use a number of books about psychoanalytical theory. In my opinion, Lacan and Deleuze opened some very interesting problems, how modern society pushes a persons' mind into schizophrenia/schizophrenic thinking and acting. The another interesting problem is, how computer-era influences person's mind. \nHope I helped :) Good luck!