Can someone help me on my report - The battle of midway?
447730
www.google.com and www.altavista.com will give you all the information you need.  Go look it up...
1122910
Sorry about your grandfather.  Yes, the Princeton was a famous light aircraft carrier that took part in WWII in the Pacific campaign.  You should Google this; there'll be a lot of stuff there.
178592
There was an article about the Admiral Nelson in US News and World Report a few months ago.  He really did lose an arm and won several naval victories.  Great leader.
277828
There is an article at the link below that provides a lot of information surrounding the bombing.\n\nhttp://www.doug-long.com/hiroshim.htm\n\nFrom what I know, based on the outrageous outcomes of the battles in the Pacific, primarily Iwo Gima, military analysts determined that the human cost of invading mainland Japan would have been extreme. Analysts figured American losses to be between 500,000 and 750,000, and Japanese losses at 2.5 - 3.2 million. The two A-Bomb attacks only cost 200,000 Japanese losses and forced them into a surrender. Americans were weary of the war after 4 years of intense fighting and wanted it to end. The bombings brought that end; saving America from another estimated 2 years of fighting and both countries millions of lives combined.
1066775
go to chinanews.com/war
1020889
The young Marine is CORRECT!!  Guadacanal was our first major confrontation with the Empire of Japan.  After we took the island it gave us a piece of real estate to set up operations for Gen. McArthurs and Admiril Nimitz Island Hopping Campaign.  The airfield at the canal was a key element for our bombers to launch missions on other islands.  We owe our freedom to men like your grandfather.  If he is still with you, do me a favor and give him a big hug from me!  Hell from all of us I'd say!  God Bless Him!\n\nVery Respectfully,\n\nRJ
947675
Type these words into the search engine of your choice.\n\nWorld War Two.\n\nIf you can ask that question on here you can do your own homework. Stop being so lazy.
209247
Here's an idea.....Read the book!.  If you don't have time to read the whole thing, try Cliff's notes.  You can also search online for reviews of the book.  Even if you don't have time to read the book for the report, don't rob yourself of a good literary experience--it is never a bad idea to learn more.  DON'T CHEAT!!!!!
876692
WEB LINKS\n\nPRIMARY SOURCE DOCUMENTS.\n\nFantastic Resources.\n\nhttp://www.historyteacher.net/APEuroCourse/WebLinks/WebLinks-WorldWar2.htm\n\nWorld War II\n\nWorld War II Timeline\n\nhttp://ehistory.osu.edu/wwii/timeline.cfm\n\nThis World War II 42eXplore project encompasses numerous websites.\n\nhttp://www.42explore2.com/worldwar2.htm\n\nWORLD WAR II LINKS\n\nhttp://gi.grolier.com/wwii/ww2link.html\n\nThe events leading to World War II, its military operations, diplomacy, statistical data, and results, are discussed under the following headings:\n\nhttp://gi.grolier.com/wwii/wwii_i.html\n\nPrincipal Battles of World War II\n\nhttp://ehistory.osu.edu/wwii/battles.cfm\n\nhttp://www.euronet.nl/users/wilfried/ww2/ww2.htm\n\nhttp://members.aol.com/TeacherNet/WWII.html\n\nhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/special_report/1998/10/98/world_war_i/197437.stm\n\nhttp://www.archives.gov/research/ww2/photos/\n\nWorld War II (1939-1945)\n\nhttp://www.uwm.edu/~jnelsen/ushist/contents.html\n\nHistoryList - Greatest Loss of Military Forces by Country in World War II\n\nhttp://ehistory.osu.edu/wwii/ListPreviewOnly.cfm?LID=20&PreviewOnly=yes&public=yes&EID=6\n\nWEB SITES FOR TEACHERS ON WORLD WAR II\n\nhttp://www.cumbavac.org/Websites_on_World_War_II.htm\n\nGood luck\nKevin, Liverpool, England.
223802
try this page.. it has so much information about Pearl Harbor and Roosevelt getting into it.. hope it helps.. :o)\nwww.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/pearl.html\nand also\nwww.history.navy.mil/photos/events/wwii-pac/pearlhbr/pearlhbr.htm
797717
You can get a copy of his service record from the National Personnel Records Center.  Just fill out the request and mail it to them.\n\nhttp://www.archives.gov/st-louis/military-personnel/\n\nHere's some info on USS San Francisco.  It looks like they caught hell at Guadalcanal early in the war ....\n\nThe second SAN FRANCISCO, was launched on 9 May 1933 and commissioned the following February at the Mare Island Navy Yard, in Vallejo, California. Prior to World War II, SAN FRANCISCO served on the neutrality patrol. The ship was undergoing overhaul at the Pearl Harbor Navy Yard on the day of the surprise attack. SAN FRANCISCO escaped damage on that day and went on to play a vital role in the Battles of Midway and Cape Esperance. At Guadalcanal, SAN FRANCISCO fought heroically, but suffered extensive damage and personnel losses. Some 77 of her crew were lost, including Rear Admiral Callahan and Captain Young and 105 other crewmembers were wounded. The ship received the Presidential Unit Citation for her actions at Guadalcanal. SAN FRANCISCO later participated in a final show of force in the Gulf of Pohai, which led to the surrender of the Japanese naval forces in Korea. The CA-38 was decommissioned on 10 February 1946 after earning 17 battle stars. \n\n\nhttp://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-s/ca38.htm
622801
www.wikipedia.com!! helped me on a lot of history assignments... just type Gulf war... ull get the info in like 2 seconds(depends on ur net speed lol)
591650
Compare news stories circa 1940, 1917 & 1861 and todays news articles on American wars from at least 3 separate newspapers. You will need to go to achives for most of these years.\n\nFind out the public support percentage\nGovernment expenditure on the war\nThe entertainment of the day\nPresidential speeches on the war\nAny austerity measures the public was part of\n& Foreign allies\n\nOne suggestion for you. Keep the topic current.
651635
Some info is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War#Relationship_between_the_two_sides_since_1950
154178
Words of wisdom from an old college professor of mine ...\nwrite your paper as if the reader knows nothing about the subject.\n\nConflicts is plural.  It would be helpful if you identify several conflicts, then zero in on one conflict that seems to best summarize all conflicts in the region. \n\nMake sure to answer the following questions in your report:\n\nWho - who are the parties to the conflicts?\n\nWhat - is the nature of the conflict?  There should be at least two opposing perspectives.\n\nWhen - When did the conflict begin?\n\nWhere - Where did the conflict begin, and how expansive is the conflict now?  In other words, did it start in one village and now consumes the entire country, region or continent?\n\nHow - How did the conflict begin?  Did one warlard begin the oppression to fill a power vacuum?\n\nWhy - Why did the conflict begin?  What were the circumstances that were present that allowed the conflict to start and grow?  In other words, did a powerful leader or group of leaders cease to rule thereby allowing the warlords to initiate their own plan for rule?\n\nRemember, written history is always about perspective.  One journalist may have one perspective and write about a situation, while another journalist may have a completely different perspective.  For example, a Muslim journalist may see the warlord power grab in Sierra Leone in a very different light than a western journalist.  So, you will ultimately produce a better paper if you read different perspectives, then draw your own conclusions.  Your conclusions should not be based on your emotions, but rather cause and effect.  To be more specific, avoid emotive statements like:  What's happening in Darfur is wrong because it is unjust.  Rather, explain how it is unjust.  Search out any statistics on quality of life in Sierra Leone before the conflict, then compare to quality of life now.  In other words, be objective!\n\nThen, after you have your research and your perspective, create an outline.  Like this ...\n\n1. Who\n    A.  Party #1\n    B.  Party #2\n2. What is the nature of the conflict\n    A.  Explain the most obvious part of the conflict\n    B.  Explain a secondary part of the conflict\nEtc...\n\nWhen you're ready to begin writing the paper, create your openning paragraph in such a way as to introduce your reader to the subject matter in the most general way.  Then follow your outline to provide more specifics.\n\nDo make sure to bibliograph your paper.  Meaning, if you  learn that, for example that, 100,000 people have been displaced from their homes, insert a # behind your point in the body of your text.  Then at the very end of your paper tally the numbers and next to each cite the reference. This will be your "Bibliography Page". For example, the following sentence might be in the body of your report:  \n\n"100,00 people were displaced from their homes."1\n\nThen your bibliograpy page should correspond.\n\n#1 - Article from Newsweek, Vol. 1, page 42, written by John Doe.\n\nMake sure to be concise, no run-on sentences, use complete sentences, check your spelling, try to make it interesting by using adjectives, then write the paper like the person reading it has never heard of the subject matter before. \n\nIf this assignment is for grade or high school, I would attach a neatly typed copy of the outline to the back of your paper, behind the bibliography page.  By doing so, you'll show your teacher how you organized your content, and might get extra points for its inclusion.\n\nRemember, the point of the assignment is for you and your reader to learn about the subject.  Oh, and have fun doing it.  That grey matter between your ears is longing to be exercised!
532182
http://www.angelfire.com/mb2/battle_hastings_1066/1066.html\n\nTry this link
87316
well, u need to start looking. Its only one of the biggest battles in world history!! Do u have encarta? Its on there. what do u need to know? I am a history grad. and may be able to help. email me if need be, dmpusa1@yahoo.com.\nHere is a site that may help. http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/dday/