are a monkeys kids hairy?
436808
Monkeys don't have kids.  Goats do.
666688
Public hair causes inconvenience while masturbating and while having sex. And also this days boys like shaved public hair. They even shaved their own public hair.
1008402
I like purple monkeys. They only have one known preditor. That being the elgant yard gnome. Those gnomes can be mean!
1011413
U got a problem with monkeys?
715703
Everyone has about the same amount of hair as an ape, it's just that it's finer and lighter coloured.  as a consequence the thicker and darker the hair the more noticeable it becomes.  Hair grown as the result of eating disorder is called Lanugo and is a downy covering of most of the body.
278186
I don't know that I quite understand you're question, but whether or not humans are mammals, I believe that is correct.  All animals with hair are mammals of some sort so are animals who produce "milk".  So if we aren't mammals exactly what do you think we are?
583341
This question is miscategorized.\n\nSpecial Education refers to the education and parenting of children with special needs.\n\nThat being said...\n\nA monkey is a primate with a tail (easiest way to tell). There are also other differences like smaller brain capacity.\n\nA chimpanzee is one of the Great Apes (also includes gorillas, etc.). Great apes do not have tails, have a larger brain capacity, often use tools (e.g. a stick for getting at termites, etc.), and can learn to use complex language.
392240
they have a gene that causes them not to be hairy
81537
So other monkeys notice it.
596095
Monkey likes to look!
97013
If you are really interested in monkeys there are great primate centers at some colleges world wide. I know of one that is in Louisiana that has in the past given tours and allowed children to have responsible one on one interaction with all types of primates. Another option would be to look into places like Sea World or Busch Gardens as they often have rotating exhibitions of animals from all over the world that are used to educate and entertain the public. If just interested in general animals then please look into your public zoo. Most have a petting area specifically for children and some even can bring the animals to your school or day camp.
381231
Although many people link this behaviour to the theory that monkeys have lots of ticks and lice on their bodies and need constant grooming, the fact is that it is a misconception!\n\nYup, monkeys do have ticks and lice (just like other animals) and they do keep scratching "themselves" because of those tiny devils BUT, they scratch "others' heads" for a different reason.\n\nAs you know monkeys are very active and agile, and they keep jumping here and there all day. Due to this over-activity, they sweat a lot and the salt particles from their sweat get deposited on their bodies (mostly the head and the back).\n\nNow, monkeys find the salt particles of the sweat very delicious and crisp. That's why they pick the particles from the heads of other monkeys and put them in their mouths to taste them (as you might have observed).\n\nSo, you now know that the monkey is having a delectable snack when it is scratching other monky's head. Right?
864916
hey borat:\n\nhumans and monkeys shared a common ancestor, they are "cousins" not directly descended from each other.
160623
A southern expression for a small child. Slighly older children are called yard apes.
894101
A monkey (eg baboon, macaque, tamarin) has a tail. A chimpanzee, which is an ape, does not have a tail\n\nOther types of apes are: gorillas, orangutans and gibbons
836762
Technically, we don't differ from primates since Homo sapiens are primates.  Monkeys, lemurs, apes and hominids all belong to the order Primates.   \n\nI'm assuming your question is "How do we differ from other primates?"  So, I'll answer that instead.  \n\nWe are unlike the other primates physically in that we do not have opposable thumbs on our feet.  Our hipbones are structured differently to facilitate vertical walking.  Due to this, unlike other primates, humans are the only obligatory bipedal primates.  One misconception is that humans are hairless relatives of apes.  In fact, we have just the number of hair follicles per square centimeter of skin that one would expect on an animal of our size.  It's just thought our hair is unpigmented and finer and shorter than most other animals so it's not as visible at a glance.    \n\nApart from physical characteristics, our advanced brain size and capacity exceeds that of lesser primates.  This allows us to have abstract thought and use logic and other ideas that lesser primates are capable of.  Our use of tools and external objects to compensate our physical shortcomings is unrivaled not only among other primates, but among all other organisms.  \n\nWe do have some common characteristics with primates.  After all, we are supposed to have descended from a common ancestor.  Like other primates, we have opposable thumbs on our hands.  Also, all primates have five fingers (not counting my old shop teacher, Mr. Windslow).  All primates have fingernails instead of claws, or other keratinous apendages.  In general, primates are social creatures.  All primates also have forward facing eyes, useful for depth perception.  Humans are similar to most primates in that we are both omnivorous, meaning that we have the physiology to eat and digest both plant matter and meat.
310750
In contrast to most mammals, humans do not have an all-embracing intense hair on their body. Several theories have been advanced to explain the bareness of human body hair. One suggests that nature selected humans for shorter and thinner body hair as part of a set of adaptations including bipedal locomotion and an upright posture. There are several problems with this savanna theory, not least of which is that cursorial hunting is used by (other) animals that do not show any thinning of hair, and that hair similar to chimpanzees and gorillas also shades the skin from radiant heat and protects it from hot winds, and thus another mechanism for heat loss is not required. Another problem is that bipedal locomotion apparently now predates hominids moving from a forest environment to a savanna environment. A more recent theory for human hair loss has to do with a possible period of bipedal wading in a salt marsh in the Danakil region of Ethiopia, possibly occurring in the hominid lineage between 5 and 7 million years ago. As a wading animal, it was more efficient to develop short body hair and a layer of subcutaneous fat for streamlining and insulation in the aquatic environment; the eccrine sweat glands developed later after the hominids left the water; see Aquatic ape hypothesis. One problem with this theory is that both chimpanzees and gorillas have the same density and distribution of the eccrine glands, but that they have not been developed for sweat production.\n\nA third theory for the thin body hair on humans proposes that Fisherian runaway sexual selection played a role here (as well as in the selection of long head hair). Possibly this occurred in conjunction with neoteny, with the more juvenile appearing females being selected by males as more desirable; see types of hair and vellus hair. The human female body hair typically has more vellus hair (making the skin appear bare), while the male body typically has more terminal hair (especially on the chest, abdomen and back). Thus sexual selection can explain the sexual dimorphism in human body hair, with the results of selection being more evident (more extreme) in the female than in the male, a point which the other two theories cannot address without proposing substantially different behavior between males and females. Also, we see that artificially bare (shaved, etc.) legs, arms, etc. on women are seen as "sexy" even today, while body shaving is not nearly as common for men.