what grammar rule makes "I heard him sing the song" correct, but "I heard him sang the song" wrong?
452853
There are not really "grammar rules" about this, because native speakers don't do it the other way.\n\nHowever, as a linguist, here's how I would analyze this sentence:\n\nI heard [him sing a song].\n\nThe bracketed part of this sentence is kind of like a nonfinite clause.  The subject of this clause is "him", and the verb of this clause is "sing".  Because it's a nonfinite clause, the verb does not need to be conjugated, so it appears in its basic form, "sing".\n\n(By the way, the reason it's "I heard him sing a song" and not "I heard he sing a song" is called Exceptional Case Marking.  Depending on how into linguistics you are, you might want to take a syntax class if you really like stuff like this!)
946251
"I will be going to reach the school at 8 p.m." is cumbersome.  It should be written "I will reach the school at 8 p.m.". Anything that you write "I will be going to VERB" can simply be replaced by the verb itself prefaced with the future "will".  It requires no verb conjugation changes.\n\n"I will be going to sing" should just be "I will sing"\n"I will be going to swim" should be "I will swim"\n\n"I will be VERBing" doesn't work that way; you can't take something out of the sentence without substantially restructuring it.\n\n"I will be singing." is a complete sentence that you can't take a clause out of.  You could say "I will sing", but that's active and not passive voice (the linking verb "be" makes the sentence future passive).  Further, the word "singing" has to have the suffix -ing removed for it to make sense (you can't say "I will singing").\n\n*****************************************************\n":I WILL BE GOINGTO SCHOOL. ex.2:I WILL BE GOING TO REACH THE SCHOOL AT 8 A.M"\nIn reference to these examples, the first says you will be en route (on the way) to school at a particular time.  The second says you will arrive at the school at a particular time.  You'd still be better off saying "I will reach the school at 8 am" though if you intend the second.
833391
Are you discussing a class in school?  Or are you discussing the grammatical "simple subject"?\n\nIf it is a class, that totally depends on your interests.\nIf it is part of grammar, that would be You, "I", "He", "She", or "It". An example would be "I ran."   I is the simple subject, ran is the verb.
867419
No, it isn't correct.  Correct usage would be, "Has he got the money?" or "Did he receive the money?" or "Has he received the money?"
186794
An easy way of establishing it is to see what the sentence would sound like without one or two words in it.  So if you would say 'I went to the game', then 'Doug and I went to the game' would be the correct thing to say.\n\nIf you would say - 'The score at the game affected me deeply as my team lost', it would then be OK to say 'The score at the game affected Doug and me deeply, as our team lost!'\n\nSo if you leave the 'Doug and' bit out of the sentence, then the context will tell you which one you should use.  That also goes if you are using either Doug and I or Doug and me as the answer to a question.  'Who broke the window?' 'Doug and I [did]' - the word 'did' being implied.  However, it's very hard to find a context in which 'Doug and me' would be used.  'Who would like to go to the game?' is usually answered by shouts of 'Me! Me!' when really it should be 'I! I!' as 'I would' is implied, and you wouldn't say 'me would'!  So on a stand alone basis 99.9999999999999999% (recurring) of the time, 'Doug and I' is probably the right answer.
187313
Grammar is like the wind, the rules change with time. One English teacher will say incorrect, another would say correct. That how come is, I don't know.
915244
Sang is the past tense of To sing.  Therefore,  the action in your sentence must be complete and in the past, without any impact on the present or the future. \n\nYou also need a subject to your verb so, either a name or a personal pronoun. e.g.: Erik sang a song. He sang a song.
393334
This and Reichman should be capitalized.  There should be a period following Reichman.  You should have said "I asked a music question".  There should be a period following thing.\n\nI hope this is what you wanted because I don't really see a question here.
553324
just get rid of the John and if the sentence makes sense use it\nfor example\nJohn and me went to the store.\nnot right\nbecause me went to the store makes no sense.\nJohn and I went to the store is correct.\n\nbut you would say me if it was the direct object of a verb. for example, the car hit john and i is incorrect,\nbecause the car hit i is gibberish.  the car hit me is correct. so the car hit john and me is correct.
248003
Yes, that is correct... however it's spelled 'grammar'.. not 'grammer' :)
175733
What a shame. So many incorrect answers.\n\nJim and I versus Jim and Me\nFor some writers and speakers, the case of a pronoun becomes especially troublesome when that pronoun is compounded with something or someone else. When the pronoun is being used as a subject, there is usually no problem:\n\nJim and I are playing tennis this afternoon.\nJim and she are playing tennis this afternoon.\nWe learn this lesson so well — getting cuffed on the ears and being forced to stand in the corner when we say "Jim and me are playing tennis. . . " — that when the object form of the pronoun is truly called for, we're apt to come up with the subject form instead, as in "Grandma left Jim and I her rocking chair," which is bad form, indeed. \n\nThere is a simple rule here that seems to work very well, at least in writing. Ask yourself what pronoun form you would use without adding the other person — "Grandma left me her rocking chair" (coming up with the correct form for the indirect object) — and then, when you add the other person, don't change the form of the pronoun: "Grandma left Jim and me her rocking chair." \n\nThis rule works whether the pronoun is being used as an indirect object, as above, as a direct object — "The policeman stopped Jim and me" — or as the object of a preposition — "Grandma gave her rocking chair to Jim and me." Some writers and speakers will mistakenly say "This is just between Jim and I," not realizing that the preposition "between" calls for the object form of both pronouns, including "me."\n\nThe rule also pertains to sentences in which a pronoun is compounded with yet another pronoun: "Grandma gave her rocking chair to him and me, but that's just between you and me."\n\nNotice that when "I" is compounded with another subject, the "other person" or people get first billing: "Jim and I are playing," not "I and Jim." This is one of the very few polite forms in English.
896262
Grammatically, they're both correct.\n\nIf you're using this sentence in some kind of composition, your biggest problem is that the sentence has an inconsistent tone. The middle of the sentence has the sophisticated "atypical dialects," while the beginning and end are much more conversational and less descriptive.\n\nBut if you're asking me to pick, I would say the second.
935037
It is correct according to MS Word spelling and grammar check.  Use it...  Tools >Spelling and Grammar from the standard MS Word tool bar.  \n\nThey both will pass the test grammatically, but the first makes most sense.
869749
nothing!...it's non-sense...something like "Oh look at him! He's an attractive frog-man" (!?!?!?)...but that's after doing a bit of interpreting since the grammar is all scr*wed up!
153791
Here's my sentence: "Me" is an objective case pronoun.\n\nAlso, you spelled "grammar" incorrectly.
1050853
When have you gone just sounds awkward, but I'm not sure if it's grammatically correct.
1156874
Ask the experts on this field and that would be teachers/instructors who had been teaching the English Grammar for so so so long.  Better still hear them first when they talk and ask them personally of the correct usage.