who will win the french open.your favourite player is federer or nadal.all time favourite?
442505
I'd love to see Federer win but Nadal still seems the safest bet. That said, with all the hype surrounding the clay-court winning streak, it almost seems like he could be riding for a fall. It often happens that way in sports. When someone is seen as so much of an invincible favorite going into a championship, that's when an upset or an injury or some other kind of misfortune occurs. Look at the New York Yankees. In 2000 they won the World Series over the Mets (the famous "Subway Series"). The next year they go out as HEAVY favorites over the Diamondbacks and...LOSE! So yes, stranger things have happened.\nAs far as my favorite of the two. Federer, hands down. Such all-round dominance over the past 3 years, 7 Slams without losing in a final, the best game to watch by a long way. He mixes offense and defense, and can hit every coceivable shot.\nFavorite of all-time. I guess, Sampras. When you look at what he did for most of a decade against a particularly strong top ten. The amount of classic matches. He's a natural pick. \nFederer looks like he could reach that level, but he's still got a lot of winning to do first
1072173
tough to call.. agassi has the experience.. nadal is 16 years younger.. \n\nthey said agassi was limpin' around after his last match.. i'm gonna have to go with nadal simply because of the youth factor
982966
I'd like to hate Lleyton Hewitt because of what he did to James Blake and one umpire (who happened to be 'black') a few years ago. But I have seen him improve his on-court behavior so I try to forget what he did during his younger years.\n\nRafael Nadal is also a very intense player, to a point that he sometimes cheers for his opponents' errors, an act which does not comprise a perfect gentleman of the game.\n\nI assume many would say Nicolar Kiefer because of his bad antics during his battle with Sebastian Grosjean some couple of months ago. However, I find him forgiveable because he is one guy who would always try his best to win a game. \n\nIt would be much easier to answer who are my favorites. Simple. Federer and Blake. Nice role-models for tennis afficionados. Mild-mannered, gentleman and good ambassadors of the game.
457945
There are about five players with an excellent chance of winning the French. There are also about 20 other players that are capable of winning but are considered dark horse / longshots to win. Nadal being the favorite to WIN, Federer is between 2 and 4 on on players with the best chance.   Nadal, Nalbandian, Federer, Coria, Ferrer, Ferrero, Gasquet, Davydenko, Robredo etc. are all excellent contenders for the French Open
542973
nope and to be honest i dont really care as i cant stand the arrogance of him.\n\nnadal is going to win the french open by beating federer again :)
909651
la numéro 1 DU tennis : justine henin ardenne\net le numéro 1 DU tennis : roger federer
1186746
i totally agree.\nNadal is Hoooooooooooottttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt!\nHe may not be dominating the grass and hard courts but, he is definately the king of the clay. with a little more practice Nadal will be the King of all surfaces.\nNadal is the best!!!!!!!!!!!!!
556855
I hope Andy Roddick will win but in past years Federer has won against Roddick.\n\nC'mon Andy win just one for me!
680460
Roger Federer. I wasn't there in Wimbledon but I watched live on TV.
1084029
Justine Henin-Hardenne won the French Open on the women's side against Svetlana Kuznetsova by a score of 6-4, 6-4.\n\nI was actually surprised that Nadal won.  Federer is such a dominating player against everyone else, and it's surprising that he could get beaten 4 times in a row by Nadal.  I guess it shows Nadal's competence on clay and against Federer.  That's one thing Federer needs to work on.
596271
MEN:\nIt is most likely that Nadal will make it into the final, but if Federer makes it to the final too, Federer might beat Nadal. Federer has been adjusting to Nadal's play on clay, and i think Federer will put an end to Nadal's winning streak on clay, because what goes up must come down. But, if Federer does not make it to the Final (maybe gets beaten by Nalbandian if on the same side of the draw), then Nadal has the best chance. So my point is: Federer has the best chance then the rest at beating Nadal on clay.\n\nWOMEN:\nThis one is mostly a wild guess since dominance in women's tennis is very distributed. In fact, there has not been a women in tennis in the past 10(?) grand slams that has won at least 2 out of those 10(?) grand slams. But here are my predictions of who has a chance: WINNERS: Hardenne, Petrova, or Kuznetsova. RUNNER UPS: Hingis, Clijsters, or Mauresmo.
22690
I like Andre.  But Federer is the most complete player I've seen, and I've been watching tennis for 20 years.
1116599
Notre ami Suisse est en constant progrès sur terre battue. Roland Garros étant le seul tournois du grand chelem qui manque au palmarès de ce champion, je pense qu'il y arrivera à force de travail et en espérant qu'il ne se blesse pas au cours de l'année. Il a réussi a accrocher Nadal a 2 reprises cette année, peut être que l'an prochain ça sera la bonne.\nPour l'US open, L'open d'australie et Wimbledon, je lui fait confiance.\nAllez Roger.
1056008
Federer, he is amazing to watch almost one of the best players of all time except when he is matched against nadal
896237
i prefer nadal although without a doubt federer is a much more superior player at the moment but nadal is a few years his junior and i think he can catch up to him
1034312
Federer seems like a pretty good bet. He's won the last three and he looks like he's adjusting to grass well this year.\nOn the women's side there's not really a clear favorite but Sharapova's got a decent chance. Maybe Mauresmo too.
823495
Nadal's next match is Wednesday evening (or Wednesday morning in the US) against Robredo.\n\nhttp://www.masters-cup.com/1/results/oop.asp