HTML Rendering speed for Combo Boxes (Select tag elements)?
448292
If you do not populate the list with DOM and have all elements be static (generated by a server side program, perhaps), the rendering time should be slowest.\n\nIE is not very good at rendering complex or big things.
708972
Depends what configuration you have... If you're running on a lower performance computer and you have a lot of apps installed, it will take a while untill the list is filled (it could last a few minutes)...(On my old Duron 700Mhz with 256ram  i had oracle 9i installed and working:D, .NET 2001 and other programming stuff and it took me 5 minutes as I remember until that list was "filled"...).
19090
You may use Javascript for it. But my advice is that you should noy change default cursor, people navigating on a website find it inconvinient
831697
lots of tools go the [b] route, because it's easier than actually dealing with "<"! it's no big deal, you just convert the "<" to "& lt;" and ">" to "&  gt;" and then convert it back when displayed.\n\nthe problem with most tags is:\nthe author of the content should not be the page designer who determines layout. (even if they are both you for now!!!)\n\na few simple tags are a good idea (bold, italic,...) but just allowing any tag will give you messy content!
1107055
Switch to Firefox! It's much better and safer than IE.
218995
I'm going to assume you want this information for good purposes.\n\nIf so, suffice it to say that if you make absolutely sure that you do not allow any HTML entities in your form-based inputs, you will not have to worry about HTML injection.\n\nThat's as simple as converting all < to ampersand-lt-semicolon and all > to ampersand-gt-semicolon
483252
If this code is rather static, you can write a utility procedure to dump the query output to a .php file. Then pages that need the query data can simply use the include statement to load the page.  You can run this utility every minute, day, week, whatever is proper for your situation.\n\nIf the data changes based on other data on the web page and you are just doing multiple round trips to the server to refresh your lists, then create the form as a page and load it using AJAX calls.  This way the whole page doesn't have to reload as the drop boxes are updating.\n\nFinally, as in the second situation where you have a form that requires the drop boxes to change based on the user input, you can dump all the data to page and manipulate it using javascript.  I have found creating a page with 500 rows of data takes the same time as one with 10 rows.  It wastes bandwidth, but making these decisions is why you get paid the big bucks.
868441
there is no set time, all major search engines are constantly combing the net for updated sites, it can take from hours to days.  Best practice is to use search tags that are unique to you (if possible) try not to put your tags within frames in the main page (search engines like plain html on the main page) and if you are desperate for listings consider paying fro them, for a business this could be worthwhile (but remember only certain key words can be listed).  Hope this helps :)
127497
Not with javascript alone, I think. ActiveX would play an important part in accessing these components.
1121194
try hand coding your html in notepad...it will benefit you more when you really want to get a good site going...but you can also try NVU (n-view) its open source so you will have full access to features and free. :)
432218
In general, anytime you are using active information in a website, the load time will be slower than if you are using plain text.\nPlain text is what was used in the very beginning on BBSs due to the fact that nothing loads faster than plain text except blank space
295264
Use a combination of things: AJAX, CSS stylesheets, DHTML, Javascript, and XHTML.\n\nUse "div" XHTML elements to contain the parts you want to be able to move around as a chunk of content.  I think you need to mark them as "float" too.\n\nMake sure they have drag event handlers on them too, so it is possible to see where they are moving.\n\nThese days, a lot of programmers/developers use Javascript libraries to handle the Javascript programming for them. Some very good ones are free.\n\nYou might need some software on another computer, to keep track of what is giong on and store the user's layout - not to mention provide the content for it. People are starting to use Ruby On Rails framework for this.  It is written in the Ruby programming language.\n\nIf you don't already know XHTML or HTML, stop by the W3 web site to get acquainted with it first.  Then you can look into the Javascript resources you will need for your front end.  Last of all, figure out how to manage the content and layouts.
491917
Help Editor? I'm guessing you need something that makes HTML easier to write. If so, I'd go with Dreamweaver. It color codes all the code which helps you distinguish code from content, and also helps you see if all your tags are closed. I pretty much use it as a fancy text editor, but if you want you can use the WYSIWYG aspect of it and have it write all your code for you.  Great thing about Dreamweaver - It doesn't add a bunch of junk to your code like Frontpage or other WYSIWYG editors.
988310
Use Casecading Style Sheets.\nDon't use big or lots of images or Flash for the sake of speed.
297508
Visit the javascript websites or google.\nsearch for "show/hide layers"\nhere is a sample\nof course there are many other\nhttp://developer.apple.com/internet/webcontent/dynamicforms.html
596162
Firefox is fast and tops. However some pages may not render ideally under FF. In these cases you will have to use Internet  Explorer at times. The IE plugin for FF is a bit buggy as well.. can't have everything in this world!\n\nHowever when Vista comes out next year, IE7 will take my cake as the best browser, the betas look great.
808754
go to "options" then turn off "animate cards" \n\nthis will save time b/c you're not going to have animation with the cards\n\nthanks\nShadowhawk--