what is the political message of 'the destrcutive male' by elizabeth cady stanton?
453166
Be strong and believe in yourself keeping in mind the values of your country.
771863
wow, that was hard to find, well at least i think this is what you were looking for......there is more about it on this website just roll down a bit and you'll see. hope this works for you\nps: dont forget to choose me as best answer...:D\n---------------------------------------------------------------\nhere it goes\n\nDabrowski (1979/1994) ---He felt that, because of their sensitivity and integrity, these individuals are capable of bringing humanity to a higher set of values, but that they are at great risk of being destroyed by society because of their inherent differences
65147
The movie Napoleon Dynamite.  I've attached the official site for you.  It's about referring to the character that's running for student body president...
240289
Thomas Jefferson is my political hero so it's not surprising that I agree wholeheartedly. Interestingly, one of Jefferson's contemporaries in Great Britain made a similar quotation which happens to be a personal favourite of mine. His name was Edmund Burke and this is what he said:\n\n"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."\n\nSee the similarity? Basically, the message is the same and it's particularly relevant today. If good men and women of conscience are unwilling to stand up and be counted, to speak out or to take action when necessary, then the villains win. Of course it's easier and safer to remain silent like sheep in the fold, but is the easy and safe way always best? I hardly think so. Sometimes you have to make a stand, take up a cause or vote with your feet. And some causes are quite literally worth fighting and dying for. If others who came before us hadn't thought so and demonstrated that belief at the cost of their own lives, where would we be now?
25144
I read the book myself about 5 years ago at school. Its all metaphors and political commentary. The link below will provide all the information you could need.\n\nAs to the above answer "do a google", you will find the 95% of the questions on here coud be solved quicker are more effectivly with a google search by the user.
910866
Actually it's about the mass murder of native Americans by early settlers. \n\nTurkey anyone?
863443
It is a political statement meaning Equality for homosexuals.
275520
Charlie is the narrator and the main character of the novel, and his miraculous transformation from mental disability to genius sets the stage for Keyes to address a number of broad themes and issues. Charlie’s lack of intelligence has made him a trusting and friendly man, as he assumes that the people in his life—most notably, his coworkers at Donner’s Bakery—are as well intentioned as he is. As his intelligence grows, however, Charlie gains perspective on his past and present. He realizes that people have often taken advantage of him and have been cruel to him for sport, knowing that he would not understand. Likewise, he realizes that when people have been kind to him, it usually has been out of condescension or out of an awareness that he is inferior. These realizations cause Charlie to grow suspicious of nearly everyone around him. Interestingly, the experimental operation elevates Charlie’s intelligence to such an extent that his new genius distances him from people as much as his disability does. Charlie eventually convinces himself that he has lost feeling even for Alice Kinnian, the one person whom he feels has never betrayed him and the only one for whom he has maintained a deep affection throughout his life.\nFeeling isolated from humanity, Charlie pursues a course of self-education and struggles to untangle his emotional life. He comes to feel that his mind contains two people: the new, genius Charlie, who wants to reach emotional maturity, and the older, disabled Charlie, whose actions are largely informed by the fear and shame his mother, Rose, instilled in him. To reach his goal, the new Charlie must come to grips with the traumas the old Charlie experienced.\nAlthough Charlie resents the mistreatment he endured while disabled, he harbors hostility toward his old self and, ironically, feels the same lack of respect for his intellectual inferiors that many others used to feel for him. It is only in the final weeks of Charlie’s heightened intelligence, before he reverts to his previous mental retardation, that he learns to forgive his family and give and receive love. Charlie’s brief moment of emotional grace comes in the form of the fulfilling but fleeting romantic affair he has with Alice. Finally, though Charlie lapses back to his original state at the end of the novel, a newfound sense of self-worth remains within him, despite the fact that he has lost his short-lived intelligence.
217641
The themes are honesty, bravery, courage, and standing up for what you believe is right.\n\nAtticus Finch knows that he is going to lose his trial for Tom Robinson. However, he doesn't let that stop him from fighting for what he knows is right. This shows his courage, because he faces physical danger and social danger as well from the citizens of Maycomb, AL. \n\nThere aren't many symbols in this book, but Mr. Ewell represents the poor South- an uneducated, bigoted mass of people. Men like Underwood and Heck Tate represent the South's prospects of a better future. They help Atticus and are willing to change.
439024
One source that I find incredible is Douglas Hofstadter’s “A Person Paper on Purity in Language.” Hofstadter challenges those against sexist language reform by taking the problematic words out of the realm of gender and placing them in the realm of race.  Many people do not have a problem using the word chairman to refer to both men and women.  Hofstadter makes this inequality clear by asking if anyone would have a problem if this dynamic were based on race.  Could we say “chairwhite” and assume that African Americans were included?  Definitely not.  His point is clear- equality and clarity in language are of the utmost importance.\n\nYou can also try reading some work by Deborah Tannen.  Perhaps check out “You just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation” or “Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men at Work.  Tannen is a socialinguist and her work with the gendered language barrier is interesting.\n\nIn addition, to being excellent resources, these works can be found online.
412992
Essentially it's saying (at least to me)...\n"My kind are conservative, we have basic family values, and we're a little bit ignorant (but we don't really care)... and we're upset because our kind isn't looked at favorably by Hollywood and corporate media... and not even by Dubya and his corporate butt-kissers.  But we're going to keep doing what we do and thinking what we think, regardless."\n\nMy take on it, at least...
165793
Hey,\n  The summary and anaylsis of the book can be found at the following two websites:\n   http://www.angelfire.com/ny/gaybooks/lefthandofdarkness.html \nhttp://www.users.muohio.edu/erlichrd/courseinsf/Lhd.html
1013710
AN OBNOXIOUS TRANSVESTITE.\n\nLIKE THE GOVERNATOR SAID A "GIRLY MAN".
67199
There's a line from an old Marcello Mastroianni movie:\n\n"The tragedy of today's woman is that she's lost the joy of being dominated by a man"\n\nHey, he said it, not me.
712350
From what I've seen, it's the name of an article by Connie Schultz.  It came from what a woman said once she was interviewing.\n\nHere's where I got the information...\n\nhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/connie-schultz/fearless-politics-speak-_b_28706.html
137965
Antidisestablishmentarianism is a political philosophy that is opposed to the separation of church and state. The term originated in the context of the nineteenth century Church of England, where "antidisestablishmentarians" were opposed to proposals to remove its status as the state church of England.
1130559
Anna Eleanor Roosevelt (October 11, 1884 – November 7, 1962) was an American political leader who used her stature as First Lady of the United States, from 1933 to 1945 to promote the New Deal of her husband Franklin D. Roosevelt, as well as Civil Rights. After his death she built a career, as author and speaker, as a proponent of the New Deal Coalition and spokesperson for human rights. She was a First-wave feminist (although she opposed the Equal Rights Amendment) and created a new role model for First Lady.