What story did the notary public tell to prove the point that justice triumphs in the end?
442843
"Once in an ancient city, whose name I no longer remember,\nRaised aloft on a column, a brazen statute of Justice\nStood in the public square, upholding the scales in its left hand,\nAnd in its right a sword, as an emblem that justice presided\nOver the laws of the land, and the hearts and homes of the people.      310\nEven the birds had built their nests in the scales of the balance,\nHaving no fear of the sword that flashed in the sunshine above them.\nBut in the course of time the laws of the land were corrupted;\nMight took the place of right, and the weak were oppressed, and the mighty\nRuled with an iron rod. Then it chanced in a nobleman's palace          315\nThat a necklace of pearls was lost, and ere long a suspicion\nFell on an orphan girl who lived as maid in the household.\nShe, after form of trial condemned to die on the scaffold,\nPatiently met her doom at the foot of the statue of Justice.\nAs to her Father in heaven her innocent spirit ascended,                320\nLo! o'er the city a tempest rose; and the bolts of the thunder\nSmote the statue of bronze, and hurled in wrath from its left hand\nDown on the pavement below the clattering scales of the balance,\nAnd in the hollow thereof was found the nest of a magpie,\nInto whose clay-built walls the necklace of pearls was inwoven."
694651
Justice is a public good in the interests of the whole of society, the costs should be borne by society as a whole until wrong-doing is proved, at which point the costs should be put to the account of the wrong-doer.  The onus must always be on the prosecution to prove wrong-doing, not on the accused to prove innocence.
100901
The term "duly executed" means that all formalities that the law requires for such a document have been done to the best of the parties' abilities and that all parties intend that the document shall represent their final agreement on a matter and have signified such by signing the document (usually before witnesses and/or a notary public).
530325
Might makes right and history is written by the winner.
966697
The notary would usually not have a financial interest in the transaction. He would just be witness to the transaction.
1102310
I chose the truth above all else and when it doesn't come from the government I bless newspapers for having the guts to tell the truth.\n\nNewspapers like the Times and the Washington Post should receive the Medal Of Freedom for trying to keep our government in check.\n\nI admire anyone who can't be bought.
483490
can u prove it was signed under duress?
526713
It is the same as tendering and passing forged documents.\n\nFrom Smith v. State 13 Ga.App. 663, 79 S.E. 764\n(1913):\nBut it is manifest that this objection is without merit because the words "pass or tender" are synonymous with the words "utter and publish." If the accused uttered the forged instrument, he published it. If he passed it, he uttered and published it; and, if he uttered and published and passed it, he necessarily tendered it.
205096
The phrase "nolo contendere" is latin for "no contest".  Basically, if someone pleads no contest they are not accepting or denying the charges, but accepts the punishment.
81295
The proper term for a notarized statement is "affidavit" and, yes, your witness can file one, assuming that the jail will cooperate and allow you to have access both to him and to a Notary Public simultaneously.  Depending on his reason for being in jail, this may or may not be possible.  Also there in mind that, again depending upon his reason for being in jail and his criminal history generally, his "bad character" could conceivably be brought into your small claims trial by your adversary.  As you might imagine, this could certainly negatively affect your witness's credibility before the trier of fact (the Judge).  You must ask yourself whether you are better off being your own witness.
1026888
Hearsay could be used as preliminary 'information' but by the time the attorneys finish with the one who 'heard', they've usually killed any credibility of the 'witness'.  And the police use LOTS of things not quite legal whenever they can.
215734
He wanted to know how the story ended?
676527
What does the evidence say?
1039367
the generous will prosper:  it means people who give generously\n                                            will be rewarded generously.\n\nglad heart means happy face:  what's inside one's heart shows\n                                                  on his face.\n\ntelling the truth furthers justice:  truth paves the way to justice.
780852
It could be this one:\n\n"For only the truth which edifies is truth for you."
601893
In my humble opinion...YES, and YES, and if I really think about it Yes.  Histories are written by winners. We in this country truly have no idea of just how bad it could get...So yes again, given the option I would rather we won than someone else....My country right or wrong, i believe in her and in this will trust that she will do the right thing, after winning that is...Morality justice a sense of fairness, all are victim or war and the very first causality a very wise man once said was TRUTH.  Win the war the dispense justice...
456455
A law that punsishes someone for an act that was not a crime at the time is an ex post facto law. \nhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/lexicon/ex_post_facto.htm\n\nThe court order to tell someone why he is being held or release him/her is a writ of habeas corpus, aka, the "great writ." \nhttp://www.lectlaw.com/def/h001.htm