WHY DOES GEORGE BUSH say  NUCULER INSTEAD OF NUCLEAR?
447402
General conversation taking place in the White House before the president's trip to India - \n\nGWB- Hey Condy, where's it we're going to y'all?\n\nDR.Rice - We're on our way to India, Mr President.\n\nGWB- Indiana? Shoulden we be there by now then?\n\nDr.Rice- No Mr President. The country of India. Indiana is a state in the US.\n\nGWB- India? \n\nDr.Rice- Yes. India.\n\nGWB- They got them there Indians in India? What's the name of their leader again, Big Chief Sitting Turkey? what was it?\n\nDr Rice- No sir. You're the turkey. The Indians in India are not red.\n\nGWB - Ohhh, I know the feeling. I can't read either. Still, it was nice of us to give them their own country, after all, we couldda just wiped them out. \n\nDr.Rice- i give up\n\nGWB - Hey, I bet you're glad I bought my cowboy-outfit now, aren't you. \n\n\nYou get the point .
5232
because george bush is president!
570654
I don't know. Does a fifth grader know how to pronounce the word NUCLEAR?
1115897
What do you mean Nuclear overhead? Most Canadians have roofs over there head!\n\nCanada has no nuclear weapons or nuclear weapons program.\n\nThank you for showing your ignorance!
279436
The United States has been reducing its nuclear arsenal since signing the Moscow Treaty of 2002.  This treaty was signed by Vladimir Putin (President of Russia), and the guy you don't seem to think is doing anything, George W. Bush.  Oh, and by the way, the treaty was written, in part, by the Bush administration, which I am guessing you won't like either.\n\nHere's the problem:  as long as other nationstates have nuclear weapons, how can we completely eliminate them?  If we don't have them, the rest of the world will stop looking to us as the global super-power we are.  We would also leave ourselves vulnerable to nuclear attack.\n\nThe US has been much maligned in it current efforts to help curtail terrorizism in Iraq, but where was all the dissention during WWII, or WWI or Korea?  That's right, everyone kept their mouths shut because they knew we were neccessary to help stop the spread of tyranny and murder.\n\nLet me ask you this:  if the US had engaged in WWII earlier, would lives have been saved?  You bet your butt they would have been.  This is what we are doing in the war on terrorism.  We are taking the fight to them before they can (again) take the fight to others.\n\nSlam the US and the President all you want but He and we are necessary, and if we don't do it, no one else will.  I guess this is the price you pay for trying to help.
178530
From the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, it sounds like they need alot of upgrading.  They don't have as many nukes targeted on the USA as i had thought, although one would be enough.
442339
Nukes are awesome.  I don't know why they aren't used more often.  Much more efficient.
539246
hey.. i love ur country :-) ur president just visited my country and i see he is very humble person wid intellectuality, wisdom and fearless personality. I agree ur country's decision to keep ur nuclear project, as long as not used to harm others.. Bush is just freaking out, that one day there will b muslim country who wont b silent when their btothrs and sisters in Palestina, Khasmir, bosnia, Irak are bombed w/out given change to question their fault. Ur president is right, when he said that scient is the right of all countries. and he is d'only president i know who says wid proud tht the great existence and 'barokah' of a country is always following ALLAH's mercy which equals to tht country's obedience to ALLAH's laws. U shud b proud of him if u r muslim, and shud support his thoughts if u r logical citizen. :-)
1145300
The use of depleted uranium is NOT the use of "low yield nuclear weapons!"  This comparison is simply invalid.\nDepleted uranium is used as is it is extremely dense, simple physics explains the use of a heavy item causes more damage than a light item as a projectile.\nNuclear weapons take advantage of the instability of certain isotopes and their ability to release great amounts of energy.\nNo valid comparison between the methods of use!
565715
President Bush is the Liberal with his illegal immigration and spending programs. Since the Amish are what a true Conservative is, there is no apparent connection to the present Republican party nowadays. So using the term Liberal really is talking about everybody that isn't Amish to a degree. I am not Amish, I like the toys and the boys. Most Republicans do too. That is just language coming from Rush Limbaugh who too is a Liberal with all of his millions, it doesn't mean anything to anybody.
789612
Ok and you can find articles on how to build nuclear weapons on the internet do that mean you have one or even have the capacity to make one in your basement? So what l am sure he was trying from the 90's to build one but that don't mean he had one and we had to rush to war to stop him from using it.
481775
I ran does not want nuclear energy,They want nuclear weapons.Listen to what their President is saying,listen to what the UN is saying.
393825
Because the nuclear powers got together decades ago and made a series of agreements prohibiting the spread of nuclear weapons to other nations, in an effort to prevent it from getting out of hand.  By preventing nukes from spreading willy-nilly around the world, and controlling the nuclear capable powers, it limited the number of nations that had to be convinced to destroy the nukes and remove the threat.\n\nOf course, the fallacy with that theory is that, "once the genie is out of the bottle, it is really tough to get it back in."  In other words, now that we know how to make nuclear weapons, we can't make that knowledge just vanish by destroying the nukes that currently exist, which is why there are still nuclear capable nations in the world.\n\nIran is one of many non-nuclear powers that are signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), stating for all to see that they would never, ever try to become nuclear capable, either by buying them from other countries or making them for themselves.\n\nNow they've been caught preparing to make fission weapons (there's no need to enrich uranium other than to make bombs -- don't let anyone fool you into believing that they need enriched uranium for power reactors -- that's just BS)) and are threatening to withdraw from the NPT so they can build bombs that they can use then on Israel and anyone who threatens them in any way.  Oh, and they can then sell them to Islamic extremists/terrorists to use on whomever they decide to hate that day (like the U.S.).\n\nDoesn't that just make your day?
481539
yes, i am sooooo ashamed. if we put aside political arguments for a moment, we are then left with a person that is unable to pronounce the word nuclear. i would think that might be an important word for a president to know.
218083
I assume you mean nuclear "bomb"...\n\nIn simplistic terms, and nothing you can't easily find elsewhere, a nuclear bomb is made up of material that fissions (meaning that its atoms can be split to release energy) - this is either Uranium-325 or Plutonium.  Uranium is found in nature but the vast majority is U-238 which doesn't fission - natural uranium must be enriched to create a fissionable amount of uranium - this is true for commercial power reactor fuel too.   Plutonium is made in nuclear reactors from bombarding other materials with neutrons.\n\nTo have a "nuclear yield" the fissionable material in a bomb must be forced into a 'critical mass' configuration which means that it is so dense (atoms close together) that once the material starts to fission and release energy and neutrons, other atoms will capture the released neutons and then they will fission releasing more energy and neutrons and so on and so on with the chain reaction making the boom.\n\nWith the early plutonium bombs (Fat Man), the material was in a sphere and was forced together with high explosives uniformly to create a ball (critical mass). In the first uranium bomb (Little Boy, which they didn't even test until it was dropped on Japan since they were confident it would work) 2 uranium blobs were forced together by essentially thrusting/throwing/shooting one to the other to create the critical mass.  The math behind all this physics is incredibly complex.\n\nTo add bang for the buck they started adding the gas Tritium, an isotope of hydrogen, hence the name Hydrogen bomb versus just the Atomic Bomb...  Tritium makes the yield much bigger.
418593
you forgot to mention that he is ignoring Isreal who has nuclear power too!!!\n\nby  the way there isn`t any Arab country who has nuclear power\nIran isn`t arab & Bush claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction just to invade it for the oil\n\nhe is just showing off with his power to hide his weakness which was uncovered when 9/11 happened
1139508
Because Bush thinks (?) in terms of politics, not religion.  He wants politicly reliable people running Iraq, because he will have better control over them.  Political sanctions dont work on someone deeply religious.