whether .net compatible with Linux  or UNIX.?
437070
You can run .NET application on Linux but you cannot develop them in the LINUX or UNIX environment
515640
Not that i know of.  If you don't have a win2k cd, i'd suggest installing Apache! It's an awesome webserver.
1081725
Well these days, anything .NET -> VB.NET, C#, J#\nJava is still popular, rising is Python
296145
In .net u can use any language which is CLS compliant, that is A standard. It is specified by ECMA group. all languages following cls can be executed by CLR.
995762
java and the .net are one of the most popular softwares for developing systems. however the suitability issue depends on what type of software you are to develop. the .net framework works best for creating windows based application, java probably for business applications and for mobile applications. you could even use C++ if you are well geared with the language
917939
Yes. and it must be .NET framework 2.0
477687
GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection provides a completely free compiler on many platforms, including DOS.  Best of all, it is completely cross platform, so the code you write for DOS can also (theoretically) be cross compiled for Windows, Linux, etc.\n\nOh, and it is completely FREE
589940
yes it is possible to install oracle on XP. it requires some some net 8 configurations
443275
do you mean the programs are already coded and running??\n\ncan you explain a bit further?? what do the programs do? how do they need to be functioning together? in what environment are they running??\n\n----------------------------------------------------------\nWell, the integration can be accomplished with .net, java, or whatever technology really. The reason why they're asking for a .net programmer is probably because the programs they already have were developed in .net, so it's just logical to go with it. It's usually more expensive to mix or switch technologies...\nRegarding the benefits of .Net, you are entering a very interesting but never-ending debate that has been going on for quite some time now: basically the question is Microsoft or non-Microsoft?? Since there is not really an easy or ultimate answer, i can just suggest that you do some reading on this subject and make up your own mind.. \nJust bear in mind that anything is possible with any technology\nGood luck getting the job..
795434
That depends on what you are doing and what you need.\n\nMyself, I still use DOS for some things.  \nI also use NT3.51, 3.1, 98SE, and XP versions of windows.\nIn addition I use several versions of Linux and 1 Unix version.\n\nSince the listed programs are all Microsoft, they focus on making you think newer is better, in order to get you to spend more money.
225578
the direct x and the dot net framework,
686780
http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Network_and_Internet/Terminals_and_Telnet_Clients/Goodtech_Telnet_Server_for_Windows_95_98.html\n\n\ntry that.  is the windows 95 computer you have your  main computer?  if not, why not try linux?  go to www.linuxiso.org  mandrake is a good beginners linux.  but, red hat linux is the best for servers.  just go to google and search linux servers.
890898
Yes you can make SAN using Linux. Go to www.linuxhomenetworking.com and it has the how to's.
66662
.NET if you want to code faster and is for windows..and J2EE if you want to make something really platform independent
885562
I'm a computer science major at the university of louisiana at lafayette.  Our computer lab that we write our programming assignments all have linux enviornments.  Our introductory level course is taught in C++.\n\nThere are two main compilers that we use.  one is the GNU compiler (g++).  I'll reference the link for the website.\n\n;-)
368565
Microsoft dropped support for that a long long time ago. In fact with .net they abandoned Basic syntax pretty much copletely. What I suggest is switching to one of the new basics. \n\nPowerbasic is the closest thing to QB that still survives.  If you look in the Linux basic groups most of those also have Windoze ports. \n\nMost of these also have more power, features and stability than QB ever did.
514063
Check this out.  It is talking about VS .NET 2003 but should get you the needed information.\n\n\n\nhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/previous/2003/sysreqs/default.aspx