hello! hee..k:.....Which takes longer to run...............................................?
444644
From second to third, because there is a shortstop in the middle.
272702
Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise... Exercise...
495721
Q1) True\nQ2) True\nQ3) True\nQ4) True\nQ5) True (so many cases)\nQ6) Heart pomps more than 3500 L/hour. This means 10 times more than the amount u said - false
87594
Our new Macintosh computer will arrive soon.\nThe  12 inch computer monitor is too small.\nOur Christmas jewelry sale offers extraordinary values on gold heart pendants.\nMy two hour commute to work everyday takes too long.\nI completed most of my biology homework this semester.
854810
Since benabean took the absolute difference in the periods, the value of K IS relevant; in fact, crucial to the solution.  My solution:\nTake the ratio of the 2 periods: T2/T1 = √(g1/g2) = 1.00095426\nMultiply this by the seconds in a day (86400)→ 86482.4\n\nSo, a difference of 82.4 sec lost per day.
706200
Roman please! Don't confuse the poor girl any more than she already is.  Which is  it, 23 or 24?\n  \nTat, Roman was on the right track with this one.  He had the right concept, but the wrong constant in the end.  Guess that's why the Caesars no longer rule.\n\nIf Greg now runs 35 miles today, then six weeks ago he started running 35 - 2(6) or 23 miles per week.  Letting m be the mileage run per week, and n the number of weeks he runs, then we come up with this equation for the mileage Greg runs each week he is on the program.:\n\nm = 23 + 2n.\n\nWe defy the normal convention of putting the constant at the end of the equation this time, because that was the mileage Greg started with, and everything else is added to it.
1142487
I like to run sometimes, but I have never ran a race or anything, but I'm trying to increase my distance.  What works for me is increasing it one minute each day.  It seems to work.
491510
30 minutes is the recommended time. Longer is good. It is for fitness and improves health. It also is good in a lot of other ways. Read the links.
279482
lunch time\n:D\n:D\n:D\n:D\n:D\n:D\n:D
967442
And this has to do with running how?
75525
a) 72.072 cm/sec^2\n\nb) 82.63 cm/sec^2
1007901
You are close.  But not quite there.\n\nBy nearly any standard, 17:00 in a 5k is stellar running, but the colleagiate races are faster still.\n\nKeep training!  I think you are knocking on the door.
911062
B: they both are drived by a woman!
915011
It depends on how straight of a line the person can run.  If the person can run in a straight line, then the running might be the better strategy.  If not,  then stick to a slow technique.
368522
OK best way to go is walk for 5 mins a warm up then jog for about one min, walk for two, jog for two, walk for two, jog for three walk for one, continue until you have completed your run and then cool down by walking for another 5~remember that the cool down is just as important as the warm up.As you improve gradually increase your running/jogging time and decrease your walking time! Best of luck!=)
456264
What did the first Tomato said to the second tomato?\n\nAnswer: Hurry or you won't ket-chup (catch up)
133140
59 seconds... that is an easy one :)