What prove/evidence are  there to substantiate that AlQaeda or Osama Bin Laden behind 911?
93493
There isn't any.  Only the tin-foil-hat crowd that looks for some kind of justification for attacking Iraq, ( outside of oil ) even care to try.  Note they offer no direct evidence, just misleading and unsupported claims and maybe a link to a conspiracy website or two.
945027
No, I can't give you any proof because it was terrorists that did it, not the government.
679002
Allegedly it was Lee Harvey Oswald.
1178997
Number one the FBI just released a statement this past week stating that they had no hard evidence to tie Bin Laden to the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. \nYou also need to check out some history facts. During the Afgan/Russian war George W. Bush's father who was head of the CIA gave appoval for the arming and training of Bin Laden and his jihide fighters. We called them freedom fighters in our national papers. We trained and supplied them with arms. \nIraq had no weapons of mass destruction. We knew this before the invasion. We destroyed their infastructure in 1991, and put such severe sanctions against them that there was no way for which they could rebuild their infastructure. You must have a vivable infastructure in order to be able to build weapons of mass destruction. To example how severe the sanctions were, we would not allow them blood bags because they contained a tiny amount of a chemical to preserve blood, that this chemical could therorically be used to manufacture weapons of mass destruction. The sanctions alone are responsible for the death of 500,000 Iraq's citizens under the age of 5.\nWe supplied Saddam Hussien with weapons of mass destruction during the Regan years, it was Donald Rumsfield who was over there shaking his hand and simling from ear to ear in all the photos.\nGeorge W. Bush's father had Saddam Hussien as a guest in the White House prior to going to war with him in 1991. He lead Saddam to believe that it was okay to invade Kuwait. He needed a diverision, him and his sons were facing a major Savings and Loan Scandal. Neal Bush was eventually fined $500,000. for his part in this. The taxpayers cost billions. He did not tell Saddam that he shouldn't invade Kuwait, nor did he tell him he could. \nBin Laden was trained by the C.I.A. of the united states of America, he was armed by the United States of America. His family and the Bush family have long ties. I would say that Bin Laden has been George W. Bush's biggest fan. George W. Bush has been a hugh recruting agent for Bin Laden. \nAfter all how difficult can it be to find someone who stands 6'4"-6'7" tall in a country that historically is filled with short people. Let alone finding a tall man in a short country dragging a dialysis machine.\nSuch treasonesses crimes have been committed by this adminstration that even I am begining to think that maybe Bin Laden did not have a thing to do with 911. Seems to me that the money trail leads directly to the white house. \nHalliburton benefited from 911, George W. Bush benefited from 911, the republican party benefited from 911. Bin Laden's relatives were allowed to leave this country without being questioned by the FBI, or NYPD. Someone even gave authorization for a saudi private jet to go to major cities in this country when our own commerical airlines were grounded to pick up his realitives. I think George W. Bush and Bin Laden may be partners instead of foes. Afterall it was Bin Laden's family who saved George W. Bush's ass with his oil company. If any thing they are partners in crime. I would like to see us capture Bin Laden and arrest George W. Bush for acts of treason. It would be intresting to see who would sing the loudest. I'd say it is pretty much even money that it would be George.
1149911
Absolutely absurd. How could the US have helped 9/11? Why would  they? How would no one have come up with any credible evidence after all these years? What reason is there to think that it was not a well-planned attack, run by a large group of Arab terrorists? I think that is the story that fits the evidence.\n\nThey're not addressed in any plausible way. Vast conspiracies don't actually happen or work. Someone always finds out, and yet there's no evidence of this conspiracy.\n\nEdit: Jets did not intercept the planes because they are stationed hundreds of miles from where they were and were not alerted until shortly before the planes crashed. The FAA notified NORAD at 8:40 and planes were scrambled 6 minutes later, 153 miles from the World Trade Center and the first plane crashed at about that time. http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_mckinneysucks_archive.html#77997492\n\nThe buildings fell quickly because they were crashed into by giant airliners. It seems like a building like that should be able to withstand more, but neither you, nor I, nor Ruppert, nor even the engineers who built the towers know what it is like for a plane to crash into a building. The commission report clearly states that the plane struck main support beams and started fires that raged at intense temperatures, further weakining the already weakened supports. Once that happens it doesn't take long for a building to collapse onto itself.\n\nAs for WTC7, the report is clear enough that fires were started on several floors by debris. People say it looks too controlled, but they failr to realize that buildings that tall are made to crumble down and not out. If a main beam buckles, there's no momentum to throw debris out - the force is all down.\n\nHow long it took to form a commission is a question I have myself, but that alone does not make a conspiracy.\n\nAs for explosions, see this: http://www.geocities.com/factsnotfantasy/ExplosivesDebunked.html
997510
Not only is he a terrorist, he has weapons of mass destruction which I may add he is aggressively using. He was not democratically elected, there is serious evidence of voter fraud in both elections. The governments official story of 911 is the biggest conspiracy theory out. The 911 commission is just another Warren report, more concerned with covering ass then the truth. Him and his entire cabinet should be indicted for acts of treason and removed from office.
406609
Well, if the first one was 9/11, then they're way overdue.  911 days after 9/11/2001 was 3/10/2004.  Nothing of note involving Al Queda happend on that date that I can find.\n\nThe next dates in that cycle are:\n\n9/7/2006\n3/6/2009\n9/3/2011\n\nJust have to wait and see...
171650
Osama Bin Laden\nAyatollah Khomeni (sp?)\nMalcom X\nSaddam Hussain\nThe guy who piloted one of the planes into the WTC\n\n/notice any trend here?/
1007819
Before US attacked Iraq i was sure it was a terrorist attack committed by AL-Quaeda.After they attacked Iraq i wasn't that sure.\nI saw too "loose changes" and i think u should better see "911 in plane site" it has stronger points.I don't know what to say about WTC but I'm convinced that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane and nothing will ever convinced me that it was.So yes I tend to believe that it was part a conspiracy.
831064
Radical islamic terrorists were responsible for 9/11. Not Bush.\n\nAnyone that says otherwise is a partisan a-hole.
931919
911 conspiracy theory lies too. Would you like examples?\n\nSome bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive, but BBC article they mention actually is about validity of hijacker's ID. They may have stolen someone else's ID. Criminals stealing IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.”\nRead the article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm\nYou’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’  \n\nBuilding 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm...  Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. \n\nPeople said things like 'pull people out of there,' but conspiracy theorists say 'pull' is technical term for demolition.\n\n911 conspiracy theory also claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. It is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce because they wanted to avoid more suicide hits during 911 confusion. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93).  This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can watch this here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/   Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary.  \n\nSome claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.\n\n\nIts times like 911 where people need to keep cool and keep their sanity which can be hard to do. Or you'll go to war with Iraq. One thing for people to get poor government response, but another thing for people to get scammed by some nut conspiracy theorists.
269064
The USA Govt. claims it was Osma Bin laden, but it's doubtful.
186187
That is definitely true! One of the many cover-ups of 9/11!\n\nBefore the dust had settled from the collapse of the World Trade Towers, Israel's foreign ministry had expressed concern for the well being of 4000 Israelis known to have worked in or near the World Trade Towers. But almost immediately, stories of such concern vanished from the media amid reports in the foreign press which claimed that Israelis who worked in or near the World Trade Towers were specifically given advanced warnings not to go to work on 9/11. One Israeli owned company, Odigo, had received a two hour advance warning of the attacks. \n\nIsraeli supporters were soon flooding the US media with denials of the story.Even when the US media's spiking of the Israeli spy ring/phone tap story proved a clear pro-Israel propaganda bias, the claim that Israelis working in the area of the WTC were preferentially absent on 9/11 was still dismissed as an internet legend. \n\nNow, however, as the final tally of 9/11 victims is being generated, CNN's own website, which lists 9/11 victims by nationality, shows that only one Israeli, Alona Avraham, died in the 9/11 attacks and that Mr. Avraham was not in or near the WTC, but a passenger on one of the hijacked aircraft. \n\nBecause of Odigo, it is beyond question warnings were sent to Israeli owned or linked companies in the area of the WTC. Because of the almost complete absence of Israelis among the victims, it is now apparent how widespread that warning had to have been. \nFor furthur verfification,visit this website :\nhttp://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/memorial/lists/by-country/page9.html\n\nWhat do you call that?! coincidence?!\nI don't think so!\nYou do the math and think logically!
989532
NO.  President Bush is just a talking head puppet if you will for forces that control all governments.  I don't think the terrorist identified were responsible or had the resources to pull off an attack like that.  Our government is definitely covering up what happened that day.  There is overwhelming evidence to support that it was an inside job.  I don't think Bush is directly responsible but probably knows what happened.  Any agency or government institution that aids in the cover up or conceals evidence indirectly implies guilt.  They needed a new Pearl Harbor to gain support for there agenda.  Who knows who these behind the scenes people are and exactly what there up to
1054089
Well my thoughts are very similar, but I believe that Mr.bin laden's kidneys gave out in Dubai and he croaked there. Since the US Government empowered and controlled the Taliban for their own personal profit as well as their main man, we were allowed buy his family to use his demise for our pleasure, and I feel that there is enough evidence out there for any concerned, American such as myself to find out the real story.
797101
Well, the 911 hijackings and terrorists attacks have been declared actions by B.Laden and his supporters.\n\nWith that said, there has since come to light a lot of evidence to support that it was an inside job by 'unknown' government officials. Most suspect Cheney and Rumsfeld.\n\nThere has also been quite a bit of evidence questioning whether or not actual planes hit the Pentagon... but rather it was a bomb.\n\nEither way, at this point, it is pure speculation and I highly doubt we will ever know the truth within our lifetimes.
355827
Is there really an Osama bin Laden ?\n\nIs there really a fool out there who believes that a bearded man, spending time in the caves of Afghanistan by doing Namaz five times a day with comrades who don't speak a word of any language other than Arabic or Poshtu, sitting in a country which in 2002 didn't have ISD or internet could realy coordinate a suicide attack from three places of USA to two different targets, all synchronized to split-second accuracy, evading the FBI and so many other intelligences, and nobody found a trace of this all-time-great military management network which surpassed even the Japanese during the world war II ?\n\nSure it was not the work of some US-inhouse fanatics, whom the Government can not catch and so should have a myth to cover up the failure ?\n\nAnd now this man is giving a monthly update of his tirade using the federal spokesperson as his own ?