What is the Devince Code?
90231
Hi there,\n\nThe Da Vinci Code is a book by Dan Brown.\nIt is quite fascinating to know that Da Vinci hid clues in his pictures. The book also discusses the story of Jesus and Mary Magdaline. And some fascinating inventions by Da Vinci. It also tells us about a brotherhood who protect these children of Jesus and Mary Magdaline, and also safe-guard the holy-grail. The book is quite interesting and I suggest you read it.\n\nrule wid style n luv@vinny
385775
The official translation of "novus ordo seclorum" is: \n\n"A new order of the ages" \n\nAnnuit Cceptis means Providence Favors Our Undertakings
994588
The true word of God is seen in the Da Vinci Code.  Those who believe are guarenteed eternity with Dan Brown our savior in heaven.\n\nThis your friend must believe, his salvation depends on it.\n\nThere is a code at the bottom of the pages that you can use to convince your friend.  Look at the first page. It has page 1.  Then go to the next page.\n\nApply this mathamatical code.\n\n1+1=2.  What is the number on the bottom of that page.\n\nIts 2 isn't it.\n\nTry again,  before you flip do the math.  2+1=3.  Then flip the page, and show your friend.  You see the math works.\n\nThis secret code that the believers know can be used to convince non believers. It can be applied throughout the whole book.  Always this math can be used to predict the next page.
209477
Here you go...\n\nhttp://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11764a.htm\n\nADDED:\n\nSelections from Peter Damian's Letter on Divine Omnipotence\n\nhttp://www.pvspade.com/Logic/docs/damian.pdf
1135223
The code can be broken to provide the following url:\n\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuTuy0eCOi48OvHcyhoPtBnsy6IX?qid=20060621014229AAYv68B
553912
I'll check out the book you mentioned in the other thread but sounds a little too fundie for me. And sorry that you didn't like all the "mights" in my previous answer :)\n\nMonotheistic God = all knowing + all powerful\nIn some monotheist traditions the one God is all knowing/all powerful but not all. So Monotheistic God = all knowning +all powerful isn't always true and would be the first "might" in your own logic chain, might be all powerful might not.\n\nall knowing = knowledge of what you will do\nThe very fact that your using the word "will" implies that this one God who might be all powerful/knowing exists inside time. Our own studies have shown that the farther you are from a center of gravity, like the earth for instance, the slower time passes relative to someone nearer the center. So would this monotheistic god know what we "will" do or merely what we did? That is the second "might" in your logic chain.\n\nknowing what you will do = 0 choices\nThat is one way of looking at it, IF god exists inside time and IF he is really all knowning which isn't a must outside of the Judeo-Christian tradition (and isn't true across all groups within the tradition). Another way of looking at it is that knowing what you will do equates to already knowing what you chose to do. \n\n0 choices = 0 power\nThe power to choose? I'm not even sure what you mean here, the truth of the statement would seem to hinge on your definition of "power". Since power is a relative term it might be true if alot of other mights are met earlier in the process your laying out.\n\nomniscience = impotence\nWhat? Omniscience = knowledge of all things, whether real or apparent knowledge. = absolute power, not impotence. Or do you mean we're impotent? Impotent being the lack of strength to do anything?\n\nAre you a programmer by chance?\nHave you ever thought about the universe being one big program that is being compiled? The code was entered and is now being put together into a set form that was determined by the code? It sounds like what your describing, in which case we are all part of the program. Which means we dont' really need free will, we're doing exactly what we were meant to do. The reason there is a stigma attached to that kind of philosophy is that it justifies horrendous acts which are anti-social. Hitler for instance was doing just what he was supposed to, and so were Churchill and Roosevelt when they put him down. \n\nThat was a fun one to work through, I hope you got a little out of my answer. I honestly tried to answer it as best I could in the time taken.\n\nTake it easy,\nArmus
529378
Been listening to a Seventh Day Advenstist?\n\nLet's consider that Latin, Greek, and Hebrew have numerical values assigned to various letters in their alphabets. In Latin the values are: I = 1, V = 5, X = 10; L = 50, C = 100, D = 500, M = 1,000. By extension W = 10 (because W = VV, or two Vs together), and U = V (because there was no\nletter U for the Romans; where you see the letter U in modern writing, use the letter V instead). \n\nYou claim, correctly, that Vicarius Filii Dei does add up to 666 in Latin: Vicarius = 112; Filii = 53; Dei = 501. (Ignore letters which are not assigned a numerical value.)\n\nThe problem is that Vicarius Filii Dei is not a title of the pope. One of his titles, in fact his chief title, is Vicarius Christi (Vicar of Christ), but, unfortunately for all those who insist on using this ploy, Vicarius\nChristi adds up to only a measly 214, not the infernal 666.\n \nSince the average person, Catholic, Protestant, or otherwise, hasn't the foggiest idea what the pope's titles are in Latin or English, anti-Catholics (some of whom know better) can get away with this subterfuge.\n\nBut what if one of the pope's titles did add up to 666?Would that coincidence prove the pope is the\nbeast? Hardly. It would prove nothing because lots of names and titles add up to 666.\n\nBy using a nifty little technique you can force a Seventh-Day Adventist to admit that the addition to 666 proves nothing, even when it's a papal title that's in questions. \n\n(I'm not picking on Seventh Day Adventists. It's just that the last time I encountered this argument, it came from one. And a nifty little coincidence helped me diprove this person's theory.)\n\nHere's how. Do the math and you will see that the woman who started Seventh-Day Adventism, Ellen Gould White, adds up to 666: Ellen = 100, Gould = 555, White =11.\n\nDoes that fact prove that the foundress of Seventh Day Adventism is the beast?\n\nOf course not, but that would also indicate that Vicarius Filei Dei adding up to 666 is every bit as meaningless as well.\n\nBut, if stubborness rules, and you still want to believe that Vicarius Filei Dei=666=the beast - then you are forced to admit that everyone who's name adds up to 666 is a spawn of Satan. That's just a little ridiculous.\n\nSee? Either way, the claim collapses into absurdity; where it belongs!\n\nHope this helps.
1115647
The secret message is...\n\nAge for it shall be within the four stage journey of the air jordan XXI that the code shall be revealed to those who seek the jordan code in your honor have we hidden this mess
152875
originally it is theorized but not proven that they intended to as noted by the Sub Prefecture of St Julien-en-Genevois. Article VII says that its members are expected, “to carry out good deeds, to help the Catholic Church, teach the truth, defend the weak and the oppressed”. \n\nthe founder, Plantard, originally hoped that the Priory of Sion would become an influential cryptopolitical lodge (similar to the P2 cabal) dedicated to the restoration of chivalry and monarchy, which would promote Plantard's own megalomaniacal claim to being a legitimate pretender to the abolished throne of France.\n\nOver time however associatin with the priory became perverted and steeped in mystisism.  No one probably has even discussed it till popularity of Dan Brown.  But please remember that Dan Brown writes fiction.
1057107
same answer as the divincy code,,,, ITS FICTION
742983
Yes, Yes, Yes, the code is absolutely true!!!!!    STOP, LOOK and LISTEN........ The Green Cross Code - that way you wont end up seeing god sooner then you have to!!!!
663087
The ten-code was developed in the late 1930's by the Association of Public Safety Communication Officials in order to standardize radio communications.  The ten-code has nothing to do with the Bible.
281034
building/construction code office
1000955
Source code (commonly just source or code) is any series of statements written in some human-readable computer programming language. In modern programming languages, the source code which constitutes a program is usually in several text files, but the same source code may be printed in a book or recorded on tape (usually without a filesystem). The term is typically used in the context of a particular piece of computer software. A computer program's source code is the collection of files that can be converted from human-readable form to an equivalent computer-executable form. The source code is either converted into an executable file by a compiler for a particular computer architecture, or executed on the fly from the human readable form with the aid of an interpreter.
182299
Is this what you are looking for?\n\nSt. Ambrose of Milan opined:\n Give, oh Lord, rest to Thy servant Theodosius, that rest Thou hast prepared for Thy saints....I love him, therefore will I follow him to the land of the living; I will not leave him till by my prayers and lamentations he shall be admitted unto the holy mount of the Lord, to which his deserts call him. \n\n(De Obit Theodosii [c. AD 395] or Migne PL 16:1397)\n\nOr is this what you are looking for?\nhttp://www.ostia-antica.org/~atexts/codex.htm\n\nThere is an English translation of the Code by C. Pharr: \nThe Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions (Princeton, 1952).
1003807
no.........do they make codes like that?
7461
It's a sequence of commands issued with one or more interfaces to the game (es. keyboard, joypad) that unlock special features in the game. Usually cheat codes gives you infinity lifes, invulnerability, endless ammo and so on.