Did anyone see the footage about the astronauts in the moon pointing at extraterrestrial beings looking back ?
84818
As a matter of fact, I did. I recall seeing a blurb about this in Chariots of the Gods. It was stated but not often reported that non-terrestrial ships were noted by astronauts. In fact, there is a number of sightings by NASA personnel re: extra-terrestrial encounters or 'experiences.' Project Blue Book was originally set out by the USAF in 1951 to address these concerns. The initial goal was to collect the stories and then to set about disclaiming or disproving them in public. The project backfired and ended up collecting far too much data for easy dismissal. What it did do however was highlight what was known, what material was collected and by whom. American citizens were fooled into thinking that their government wanted to know...when in fact it really wanted to cover the materail up PRIOR to information going to the press. To this day, much of the most interesting evidence re" extraterrestrial evidence has been prevented from being released and/or "lost."
66745
I believe they are real. Though I nor anybody else has any solid proof of this. If they are real they are not making their prescense to us. I think they think of us as primitive beings. So they are just going to pass us by until we can get a positive handle on mankind. Think about it. Would you give us technology to fly a ufo or go back or forward in time to us if we were them? We as mankind are blowing each other away with guns and nuclear missles. Its like teaching a bunch of ants on an anthill how to use a shotgun. Long story short. If there are aliens out there, they wont make their prescence known until mankind here can get along peacefully.
646534
because they never went.\n\nthey have satellite images of mars rovers (tracks in the sand an all!), but not of the lunar landing artifacts.\n\nactualy i'd like to challenge any astronomers out there with the biggest telescopes to zoom in on the landing site during an eclipse or whenever there is no sunlight shinning on it. let's see what comes up.
1172922
Yes it's very interesting. I've heard different versions of this. What's actually a good read and goes into some detail about this stuff is "the bible code II".\n\nif you place yourself back in biblical times and saw a ufo how would you describe it? "it came from the heavens"\n\nif the occupants came out how would you describe them? "gods"\n\nif they showed you something as simple as a cigarete lighter what would you say? "they can perform miracles, creating fire from their hands"\n\nthere are many references in the bible that describe things that can be interpreted as aliens.\n\nso i wouldn't say there is no evidence like a poster mentioned here. check out the link i am providing that seems to show that we have been visited throughout recorded history...
724011
Of course there is!  I've already answered a few questions like yours.  I have come across an alien-- actually a few.  The ones I met were extremely bright and intelligent.  They have a different way of revealing themselves, than what we might imagine.  We always think of movies and expect to see this "thing" in front of us, but the friends I met were very kind and very subtle in their approach.  I wasn't afraid of them at all.  We tend to heavily rely on what science calls the "five senses".  They, however, use different energy patterns to travel and communicate.  Sometimes, however, they show us their brilliance by revealing their beautiful lights at night--kinda like fireflies showing off in the night.  Other times they are invisible and you just kind of "sense" them around.  There is so much hype about them even after they've been here for eons.  Seems the ancient folks were drawing their crafts in the caves millions of years ago.  What I learned from them was that we have many good helpers watching us and protecting us.  I felt enormous compassion from them.  I really missed them when I no longer felt connected closely to them.  I've been answering questions like yours just because I like folks to know that we have a lot of help here.  There is so much fear about the planet's doom.  The message I received from my "alien" friends was one of hope and joy.  There's still work that needs to be done here, but we really and truly are being joined by a lot of planetary helpers.  I have no doubt about what I experienced as being true.  I was under no influence of drugs or hallucinogens.  I was just asking God for a better way to live.  I was also asking for some hope for my own life and purpose.  I was given an incredible answer by some incredible beings.  I always like to share my experience whether people believe me or not.  So, thanks for your question.  Perhaps some day you too will meet an "alien." \n\nAlso, I am told that at one point there were some very destructive forces that came here to cause chaos.  Those influences are currently exiting this plane.  Yeah!
610062
I don't know if your question is serious or not, but if it is...from reading literature about UFOs and alien abductions, it seems like they were abducted by aliens. Only hypnosis will help them remember what happend during the two and half hours they don't remember.
795625
Yes, there is quite a bit of equipment on the moon that was left behind during the six moon landings.  This inclues the "moon car", the descent stages of the Lunar Modules, and numerous experiments.\n\n And, there are several crash sites where the Saturn IV-B boosters were crashed intentionally onto the moon in order to produce seismic vibrations for the seismometers left on the moon by the astronauts.\n\nThe problem is that none of the equipment is large enough to be seen by telescopes.  At that distance, even the Hubble Space Telescope cannot resolve objects less that three or four meters in size.  Nothing we've left behind is large enough.\n\nP.S.  I think "spacejohn77" was referring to the article linked below.
814259
No. I saw the film. \n\nIt is possible that I just imagined seeing this film, but this is just a conspiracy by those who believe that the moon is made of cheese.
1017971
I know it's a hoax because they filmed it in my backyard.  My parents had a place that had craters and a lot of white cheese and NASA asked us if they could use it for the astronaut's training...we agreed and then we found out that the astronauts were falling in the craters and putting flags in them and eating the cheese and saying they were on the moon.  We had to move away due to the embarrasment to our family and we were in hiding for many years.  It's only now I can tell you this because it's been over 30 yrs but if you don't hear from me anymore, it will be because NASA came back.  To verify my story, just ask Al Gore..he made global warming with a big window fan and now he is trying to blow it everywhere.
552042
No, it's the stuff of the lunatic (no pun intended) fringe.\n\nHowever, if you want to see some evidence, go to www.badastronomy.com\n\nAll the supposed "evidence" is flawed.\n\nI think subsequent, unmanned trips have inadvertently photographed the space junk left behind on the lunar surface.  It couldn't be there if we hadn't left it.\n\nThe only piece of proof you'd need is for an unmanned probe to photograph the flag we left.
302436
Actually I believe they did... evidence exists and all the proof people give to say otherwise can easily be explained... space missions still go one today and people do still land on the moon. It's not impossible! We should be glad that people are making the effort to study the things around us - though perhaps my only qualm is that the money spent could be better used for something else... like helping the poor
249940
I had to look it up which is the one thing about Yahoo Answers that I adore, all of these questions about thing you never heard of before. It sounded interesting so this is what I found.\n\nThey may be all around us... in the sky, in the water, even in our homes. They have been captured only on film and videotape. No one knows what they are, where they come from, whether or not they are alive, and they have never been touched or seen at rest.\n\nThey are called "rods," "skyfish" and sometimes "solar entities." Although the video evidence is compelling that they are quite real and probably living creatures, they are completely unknown to science - a fascinating and baffling mystery.\n\nSkyfish were first documented by filmmaker José Escamilla, who discovered them by accident. In 1994, Escamilla had videotaped a "conventional" UFO near Midway, New Mexico. Fourteen days later, while seeking to photograph the UFO again, he instead captured a flying object that was not a vehicle of any kind. At first he thought it was just an insect or bird. When he examined the film frame by frame, however, it became clear that what he had captured on film was something unknown. Later, more distinct images were captured while Escamilla was filming cliff jumpers at a deep cave in Mexico. When he developed the film, small flying things could be seen zipping around the divers at a high rate of speed - so fast that they weren't seen with the naked eye. \n\nThe enhanced frames of film revealed that the flying thing appeared to be rod-shaped with two undulating wings or appendages along the length of the body and which gave it the appearance of swimming through the air. Escamilla dubbed them "rods" and has since filmed and videotaped them dozens of times. And after introducing them to the public through his website, roswellrods.com, he has received further reports and video and photographic evidence from other parts of the US and around the world. The strange flying enigmas have also turned up in documentary footage, TV news shots and even feature films.\n\nAre They Alive?\n\nWithout a specimen in hand to examine, it's impossible to determine whether or not skyfish are living organisms, but it's Escamilla's best guess that they are. The video evidence certainly makes them seem so. They move through the air like insects or birds, sometimes darting around objects with a kind of animal intelligence - but at a speed far greater than any known insect or bird. How fast? Analysis of film and video of skyfish from around the world indicate that they can be moving as fast as 150 to 1,000 miles per hour - faster than the speed of sound. \n\nHow big are they? The same analysis indicates that they might range in size from just a few inches to perhaps over a hundred feet in length! How could something that large be unknown? That's part of the skyfish mystery, yet there they are on video.\n\nAlthough most skyfish have been seen in the air outdoors, they have also been photographed and videotaped indoors and even underwater. A photograph displayed on Kitty's Kitchen website appears to show a skyfish in mid-flight ready to pass through a doorway in her home. And a TV news report on Escamilla from KCOP Channel 13 includes clear footage of a skyfish swimming in a stream, indicating that they are equally at home in the water
531032
Why do morons insist on making something out of absolutely nothing?!  OF COURSE WE LANDED ON THE MOON!  Do you think all those incredible images from space were a hoax as well?!  Ask Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and all the men who have been on the moon to show you their private photos and to share their recollections!  Must we continue to perpetuate these ignorant and unfounded stories of hoaxes??!!  Take a deep breath, switch to decaf, and join the REAL world!!  ANY of our satellites can pinpoint EXACTLY where each of the remnants of our Apollo landing equipment is, and all the flags and instruments that were left behind!!  For God's sake, people: remove the poles that have long been residing in your rear ends, as well as the remnants of retardation that were left behind in your brains!!!
1099240
I admit I have been wondering the same thing myself--espicially after seeing a documentary posing doubts we landed on the moon.  The photographic evidence posed on the show did give me some thought, being I do have experience in professional photography.\n\nThe LEM photos: That thing purportedly landed on the moon, firing retro rockets with enough blast power to burn the moon surface under it to shiny black glass.....yet the area looks undistrubed!  All that violent firepower had to have raised moon dust all over the place.....yet look how shiny and dirt free the LEM landing pads looked.  Espically take note of NO moon dust collected inside the landing foot pods themselves.\n\nThe Apollo mission cameras were state of the art of their time, with perfectly etched "crosses" on the lenses to assist with picture composition.  I still see the astronaut photo where one of those crosses IS BLOCKED OUT by the guy's shoulder--where it should've been OVERLAPPED to appear onto his arm/shoulder!!\n\nThe sun light / angle theory gets complicated.....but it clearly made sense to me....and gave rise to suspicions.  \n\nThe video of a golf ball getting shot out into space was good PR, but take note how the fine moon dust stirred up by the lunar rover merely falls back to the surface....when it should fly off into the air.\n\nThen there's the Van Allen belt explanation: stuff we learned back in fifth grade: a deadly belt of radiation, stretching hundreds of miles between us and the Moon.  You'd have to travel in a ship with walls of at least five feet thick of lead to safely shoot through it....the Apollo space vehicle walls were....what....maybe two inches (if that) thick???  And our guys never cooked like chicken in a microwave???? The Van Allen belt emits enough deadly radiation to singe fry the Apollo capsule electronics in about 2 minutes and cook the astronauts in about another minute past that.  So how did our guys do it?\n\nThe Space Shuttle: purportedly capable of travel to the Moon and back....yet it's NEVER been done.  Why? The thing can carry enough fuel, food / supplies and other life support for such safe travel.  In fact, it was one of the Shuttle program objectives...that got put on the back burner....and not likely due to "budget" or "safety" concerns.\n\nHowever, all this "evidence" is of conjecture; you have to be your own judge on if we faked the Moon landings, until we get a deathbed confession by one of the surviving astronauts to confirm we DID fake the landings.  Until then, it makes for great coffee-cafe debate amongst good friends.
557887
They have actually landed on the moon. Discovery Channel proved it, and the cost for shooting this all in studio was very high as compared to actually going on the moon. !!!!
78332
There's always been heavy debate as to whether or not we've actually been to the moon, etc. and there is actual evidence that we haven't. maybe what you're seeing is a farce, maybe it's just some scientific anomaly. Who outside of the space program can say for sure?
1042536
I can't even see it on Google Earth without having to zoom in. I can't believe astronauts have such great vision they can zoom in and see something 20-30 feet wide from a quarter million miles away. Anyone that belives that will believe anything.