Is Luke Perry related to Matthew Perry?
89452
No, as far as I know, they are not related.
7712
Lovie is his real name. Matt Smith (Lovie's son) and I went to high school together at Marquette High School in Chesterfield MO. Hes a nice guy.
459501
is he related to dirty Sanchez?
1109435
Daniel is Natasha's older brother. Daniel was born Dec. 3, 1979 and Natasha was born Nov. 26, 1981.  They also have  a younger sister named Nikola.
42817
Matty, Felipe and Jesus Alou
543177
In the book of Matthew, mark and luke.
272584
no they are no way related.\nthe only similarity between them is that they have a hole in the name ;-)
596946
NO! Tom Cruise is related to another actor from LOST, Thomas Mapother (I think that's his first name; Mapother is definitely his last name). Mapother played "Ethan", one of "The Others", on the series.\nThey are cousins.
120406
is there anyone else out there other then chris brown??? if people are sick of the subject of tom and katie or brad and angelina i'm sick of chris brown ??????'s
962465
Two explanations exist - both reasonings seem plausible to me - and both were discussed ad nauseum in my seminary classes on the Gospels...\n\na) St. Matthew's genealogy is that of St. Joseph; St. Luke's, that of the Blessed Virgin. This contention implies that St. Luke's genealogy only seemingly includes the name of Joseph. It is based on the received Greek text, on (os enomizeto ouios Ioseph) tou Heli, "being the son (as it was supposed, of Joseph, but really) of Heli". This parenthesis really eliminates the name of Joseph from St. Luke's genealogy, and makes Christ, by means of the Blessed Virgin, directly a son of Heli. This view is supported by a tradition which names the father of the Blessed Virgin "Joachim", a variant form of Eliacim or its abbreviation Eli, a variant of Heli, which latter is the form found in the Third Evangelist's genealogy. But these two consideration, viz. the received text and the traditional name of the father of Mary, which favour the view that St. Luke gives the genealogy of the Blessed Virgin, are offset by two similar considerations, which make St. Luke's list terminate with the name of Joseph. First, the Greek text preferred by the textual critics reads, on ouios, hos enomizeto, Ioseph tou Heli, "being the son, as it was supposed, of Joseph, son of Heli", so that the above parenthesis is rendered less probable. Secondly, according to Patrizi, the view that St. Luke gives the genealogy of Mary began to be advocated only towards the end of the fifteenth century by Annius of Viterbo, and acquired adherents in the sixteenth. St. Hilary mentions the opinion as adopted by many, but he himself rejects it (Mai, "Nov. Bibl, Patr.", t. I, 477). It may be safely said that patristic tradition does not regard St. Luke's list as representing the genealogy of the Blessed Virgin. \n\n(b) Both St. Matthew and St. Luke give the genealogy of St. Joseph, the one through the lineage of Solomon, the other through that of Nathan. But how can the lines converge in St. Joseph? St. Augustine suggested that Joseph, the son of Jacob and the descendant of David through Solomon, might have been adopted by Heli, thus becoming the adoptive descendant of David through Nathan. But Augustine was the first to abandon this theory after learning the explanation offered by Julius Africanus. According to the latter, Estha married Mathan, a descendant of David through Solomon, and became the mother of Jacob; after Mathan's death she took for her second husband Mathat, a descendent of David through Nathan, and by him became the mother of Heli. Jacob and Heli were, therefore, uterine brothers. Heli married, but died without offspring; his widow, therefore, became the levirate wife of Jacob, and gave birth to Joseph, who was the carnal son of Jacob, but the legal son of Heli, thus combining in his person two lineages of David's descendants.
129080
Good lord Brad and Angelina are the most profoundly annoying people on the planet! \n\nI heard Matthew Perry (Chandler from 'Friends') and Kristen David (Charlotte from 'Sex and the City') are a couple. That has to be cute.
638334
Yes in a way...they haven't STARRED in a movie together, but they've been in the SAME movie (though quite likely without ever having crossed paths on set)\n\nThey were both in Austin Powers:Goldmember in cameos...Tom Cruise ....  Tom Cruise as Austin Powers  and John Travolta ....  John Travolta as Goldmember in 'Austinpussy'
155805
Samuel Adams' father was also named Samuel Adams, though some people referred to him as "Ole Sam Adams."\n\nI can't find any record of his mother's name.
124551
The difference in nearly all the names in Luke's genealogy of Jesus as compared with Matthew's is quickly resolved in the fact that Luke traced the line through David's son Nathan, instead of Solomon as did Matthew. (Luke 3:31; Matthew 1:6,7) Luke evidently follows the ancestry of Mary showing Jesus' NATURAL descent from David, while Matthew shows Jesus' LEGAL right to the throne of David by descent from Solomon through Joseph, who was legally Jesus' father.  Both Matthew and Luke signify that Joseph was not Jesus' actual father, but only his adoptive father, giving him legal right.  Matthew departs from the style used throughout his genealogy when he comes to Jesus, saying: "Jacob became father to Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ." (Matthew 1:16) Notice that he does not say 'Joseph became father to Jesus but that he was "the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born." Luke is even more pointed when, after showing earlier that Jesus was actually the Son of God by Mary (Luke 1:32-35) he says" "Jesus...being the son, as the opinion was, of Joseph, son Of Heli." Luke 3:23.\n\nSince Jesus was not the natural son of Joseph, but was the Son of God, Luke's genealogy of Jesus would prove that he was, by human birth, a son of David through his natural mother Mary.  Regarding the genealogies of Jesus given by Matthew and by Luke, Frederic Louis Godet wrote: "This study of the text in detail leads us in this way to admit (1) That the genealogical register of Luke is that of Heli, the grandfather of Jesus; (2). That, this afffiliation of Jesus by Heli being expressly opposed to His affiliation by Joseph, be nothing else in his view than the genealogy of Jesus through Mary.  But why does not Luke name Mary, and why pass immediately from Jesus to his grandfather? Ancient sentiment did not comport with the mention of the mother as the genealogical link.  Among the Greeks a man was the son of his father, not of his mother, and among Jews the adage was: "Genus Matris non vocatur gfenus, translated "The descendant of the mother is not called (her) descendant"\n\nWe may conclude, therefore, that the two lists of Matthew and Luke fuse together the two truths, namely. (a) that Jesus was actually the Son of God and the natural heir to the Kingdom by miraculous birth through the virgin girl Mary, of David's line, and (b) that Jesus was also the Legal heir in the male line of descent from David and Solomon through his adoptive father Joseph. (Luke 1:32, 35; Romans 1:1-4) If there was any accusation made by hostile Jews that Jesus' birth was illegitimate, the fact that Joseph, aware of the circumstances, married Mary and gave her the protection of his good name and royal lineage refutes such slander.
385461
was Mark really Susy's brother?
647775
As the Jewish, Historical documentation is concerned, the line is always through the man, even if it is wifes linage.  If you notice, the linage in Matthew is different from the one in Luke 3.\n\nThe linage in Matthew is that of Mary, the one in Luke is that of Joseph.  And Luke states in verse 23\n\nNow Jesus Himself began His ministry at about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph\n\nDo some research on the different authors of the Gospels to see why they wrote from these different perspectives.
564632
Yes, he was a bull rider that died at a young age and in his prime. They also made a movie about him starring Luke Perry.