Do YOU want people who burn down buildings over a cartoon to have access to nuclear weapons?
88918
What government is this character talking about?  What was ignorant or arrogant about your question?  Ignore him.  The answer of course is that no one in his right mind would want these lunatics to have access to nuclear weapons.
1100759
No one should have Neclear Weapons.  If one blew up anywhere in the world it would affect every country.  The world as we know it would be gone.  Dangerous, dangerous things.
919598
If they want to look like idiots attacking a cartoon, more power to them!  While they're at it they should go after that movie Babe about the pig from a few years back, that could hurt the pork industry right?  And remember all the gay kids shows like Teletubbies and SpongeBob.  Obviously the conservatives take their cartoons very seriously.\n\nHere's a thought - we should give them a Cartoon Version of the Constitution, maybe then they would get it!!!
364014
I think we need to act.  An air strike targeting uranium enrichment plants combined with covert operations to discover and destroy any hidden nuclear threats would probably work best.  That would minimize civilian casualties and set the nuclear program back for years.  We could then encourage the people to overthrow the current regimen.
663056
We need to but out of the worlds business and take care of ours. The world has a police force called the United Nations let them handle it if there is a problem. If things come our way then yes we need to take action.I would say that if things don't come together the next 10 generations aren't going to have much of a world because some country wants to try and blow it up. Radiation isn't a pretty thing to see and can you imagine what the children would look like from the fall out of such a weapon of mass destruction. I am a very firm believer in protecting the HOME FRONT if thing happen, but lets not be the one to start it.
104454
well it doesnt have anything to do with the cartoon.  the cartoon was published 5 months ago.  it probably has to do with the iranian nuclear ambitions.
1125582
Powerful nukes like those US used in Japan cities, never.\nBut US is going to make some small nukes to use them in battles.\nThey are going to declare some calamitous battles in future.
482808
Why not?!\n\nThen let them forbid photographing any government\nbuildings, then malls and offices, then public\ntransportation places. \n\nBetter yet, let's ban all photography and video\ntaping, since some make-belief terrorist can\nconceivably use to plan an attack.
1041755
maybe because they prefer to built nuclear weapons for display only
125304
I would support the restrictions on screaming fire, etc. in a crowded theater. Such language does not really communicate any idea, but is only meant to hurt. It is basically an assault with words. It has no place in my ideal government.\nAs far as offending religions i think we should have the right to do that. It may be hurtful, but not all speech is flattering. We should have the right to make offensive cartoons. How people react to such speech is what should be dealt with, but the speech itself is not the problem.\nAlthough questioning tragedies like the holocaust seems insane, its not something we should regulate. Who knows how far it could be taken. It could evolve into not questioning the politics of a particular president. We should always have the right to evaluate history even if we're not very good at it.\nPornographic images are not pleasing to all people, but it mostly boils down to a moral question that is highly subjective. People who enjoy pornography should have every right to enjoy it. We can't make judgment on what type of media is "good" and what is "bad." pornography would be welcome in my ideal government.\nFinally, hate speech. That's a tough one because like shouting out "fire", hate speech only strives to hurt and offend. Does it also mean to communicate? to spread ideas? i'm not sure. I don't really completely understand the intentions of those who make hate speech. I know i disagree with them, but that's not where i stop my analysis. This issue is more ambiguous to me than the others, but still my gut tells me that i would allow it in my own government. I think most of society doesn't really have an open ear to hate speech anyways. If people must make hateful comments they can go ahead and do it. Society will probably ostracize them anyways.
407540
why so you can nuke someones computer
975156
It's about time the government practice what they preach. If they tell others they are not allowed Nuclear weapons then they should do the same. The U.K should set an example to the rest of the Nuclear powers by being the first to completely dis-arm.
1049152
This is a very difficult question.  Yes, every country has the right to nukes, it is only fair.  However, that being said, every country having nukes is going to lead to an apocolyptic war, so it is in the interest of the entire world to limit the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
83884
NOOOOO my man, lack of education and intolerance is when you bomb buildings, kill civilians, and kidnap members of the press !!!!!!! Don't you think those cartoon were the press response to the kidnapings of their fellow jurnalists (from their own or other countries) ???????
109293
http://www.michellemalkin.com/archives/004413.htm\n\nFunny - these cartoons have been seen by thousands or millions more people than if the violent protests never happened
554501
i dont know. maybe you are worried about people bombing the white house. you must want WORLD PEACE!!! =)
665922
Use of nuclear weapons equate destruction of humanity. Why is this even up for debate?