In missouri joint child custody cases can one parent impose religious beleifs on child while in other parents?
98236
Your answer is here. Children have rights and how this works is posted on this site.
62765
just because they're in prison, doesn't affect their rights to dispute the facts. If they do not agree, it won't be cheap ( and it likely won't be free no matter what) If its uncontested, and there is no disagreement about separation of assets, child custody & support etc. then you can go to http://www.legalzoom.com/divorce/divorce.asp?sState=Missouri for more information and to obtain an uncontested divorce for $249
1014883
I live in Columbus, OH.  I would think if the father can prove that the mother is not doing a good job, the courts will grant full custody to the father.  The burden of proof rests with the father, though.  Good Luck!
640684
I need to know what area of child custody law you are seeking in both states.
915123
Religion or no religion regardless if someone is demonstrating odd behavior like that around my children they need to be escorted away. I dont give a damn if you fee that you are religiously justified. Your not justifed by my foot that would quickly be in somones ass for not making sure my children was protected. I agree with you, and i wish you well
401029
Yes.  Speak to a family law attorney.
1032411
I'm new to TX and did not know it recognizes "common law" marriage. If your father and step-mom filed their taxes jointly as a married couple then he probably does have a case for bigamy. It's like a contract admitting their commitment. But if she always filed single, I really don't see how he can prove bigamy.\n\n\n\nYou know, your Father is acting irrational. He did NOT make the marriage commitment to this woman, and now expects the same protections under the law. He sounds very possesive, and selfish.
225706
I am not a lawyer nor a judge. I would think that it would depend on the custody agreement between the two parties. However, I think that this should allow the father the ability to reopen the case and change the agreement in court.
537225
Well first of all I am a muslim, and we are allowed to marry christians provided they are good christians, ya know what I mean. And yeah its kinda hard when we start thinking how it will workout but from the religions point of view its totally legal. As far as the girl and the boy are fine, both the parties cud prolly try to adjust themselves making sure their kids are happy. The children would be somefin to think about, that will worry both the parties. Either the dads religion or the moms religion. So we'll have to sort that out before they are even born. \nLast but not the least, one of you have to switch so the children could not suffer any religion problems later on. Their heads would be alot straighter not at all confused ya know wat i mean...\nI just told you wat i knew, my info maybe a little, so I'd suggest that you may go to a religious scholar to help you on this.
905261
dont quote me on it but I believe the coiurts want the child to at least 13 years of age. The judge has to ask the child and he or she must tell him on record but will be taken to a private area away from both parents as to not feel pressured into the decision
246530
shared parenting is ok in theory.the problem arises in who gets physical custody.for all practical purposes the parent who has physical custody has a much greater influnce on the raising of the child(ren) simply because of proximity.if the parents disagree on an issue the non-custodial parent has to go back into court.the custodial parent can keep the other in court until he/she gives up or runs out of money.\nthe bill you ask about does seem to be an advance in your divorce law.here in kansas most are awarded joint custody with physical custody going to the mother ,all other things being equal.
162105
Religions are beliefs of a higher power. How can a child of different religious based parents, or anyone for that matter, have a belief they don't believe in? The child would need to research each religion to see which one they agree with more than the other. The parents should not be an influencal factor in the decision making of such a powerful choice.
806676
I think it depends on the pastor marrying them, the church, and the denomination sometimes. There isn't a set of rules like that that goes for every church. They should maybe look at some other ones?
614124
I agree with Unknown. In the majority of cases, children adopt their parent's religion.\n\nHowever, Jehovah's Witnesses must study the Bible, and make a conscientious choice to dedicate our lives to Jehovah. This includes children whose parents are Jehovah's Witnesses.
631327
I have found that some sects in Christianity have no problem with this type of ceremony.  I know that as my husband and I got married (he's catholic and I was raised jewish) that the Catholic Church would have no problem with us getting married and would request a neutral location and that clergy from both religions be allowed to preside. I think the 2 faiths are used to crossing over in some cases.
1102830
The court can decide anything they want  when it comes to the best interest of the child.  It could be that they feel she can handle one child but is too stressed and overwhelmed to handle three.
757659
Yes.  Asking children to profess allegiance to a deity they may not believe in is overstepping the bounds of separation of church and state.\n \nNo.  Not on government property.  Privately owned property is completely acceptable.  A private homeowner can litter the front lawn with 1,000 crosses if they'd like.\n\nThey can pray privately to themselves and no one can stop them from doing so, but the state cannot mandate, endorse, promote or even allow any kind of organized or teacher-led prayer.\n\nNot SOLELY on religious belief, no.  As Justice O'Connor once said (to paraphrase) "we are not in the business of legislating based on morality alone."\n\nI'm an atheist, I don't think it would be an issue.\n\nComplete separation.  No organized prayer, no government endorsed prayer of any kind (this of course cannot stop individuals from praying to themselves).