Orgone   I do not find definition in my older 5th edition of Webster?
86283
Orgone energy is an alleged type of "primordial cosmic energy" discovered by Dr. Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957) in the late 1930s. Reich was an Austrian immigrant to the U.S. who had been trained as a medical doctor, psychiatrist, and Freudian psychoanalyst.\n\nReich claimed that orgone energy is omnipresent and accounts for such things as the color of the sky, gravity, galaxies, the failure of most political revolutions, and a good orgasm. In living beings, orgone is called bio-energy or Life Energy.  Reich believed that orgone energy is "demonstrable visually, thermically, electroscopically and by means of Geiger-Mueller counters."* However, only true believers in orgone energy (i.e., orgonomists practicing the science of orgonomy)  have been able to find success with the demonstrations.
1186529
Try making up your own word or go to http://www3.merriam-webster.com/opendictionary/ or try http://www.merriam-webster.com/\n\nGood luck.
230203
You can have the a complete freeware when you have download the Oxford Dictionary into your computer. You can go to this link below....
171284
hmmmmmm........the dictionary maybe!?
254892
It sounds like you need a thesaurus. It's like a dictionary, but it lists synonyms and antonyms instead of definitions. A crossword puzzle dictionary can help, too.
25984
Actually it was used in the 'mother-tongue'.  Check the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) and you will see that use as early as 1348.  It is now rare in England but quite regular in America.\n\nThe OED can be consulted online if you have an account or use it from a library/school.  Otherwise. use the book in a library.\n\nThomas Talboy, PhD, Director\nUbiquity International, LLC\nExperience. Explore. Embrace the World.(TM)\nhttp://www.ubiquityinternational.com
774516
I looked everywhere for this answer. I looked in webster dictionary I went on every search engine and couldn't find it. Maybe you spelled it wrong.
801662
According to "The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology (Wilson, 1988): \n\n"~I~ pron. 1137 i; later I; developed from the unstressed form of Old English (about 725) ic singular pronoun of the first person (nominative case). Modern and Middle English I developed from earlier i in the stressed position. I came to be written with a capital letter thereby making it a distinct word and avoiding misreading handwritten manuscripts. In the northern and midland dialects of England the capitalized form I appeared about 1250."\nhttp://www.alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxwhyisi.html\n\nThe one-letter form "O" is treated the same way (unlike "oh"), probably for the same reason.
147424
This is a webster's desktop tool:\nhttp://www.download.com/Merriam-Webster-s-Concise-Dictionary/3000-2279-10247580.html\n\nThese are tools from the webster's site for browser tools:\nhttp://www.m-w.com/downloads.htm
1143246
Is this a word because It's not in my Dictionary Lookup on Microsoft Works.
535255
there is no such word in the dictionary...
747286
it is not a word and has no definition. Maybe you have spelled it wrong, in which case try looking it up in wikipedia.org and urbandictionary.com if you're having trouble.
613745
I have never heard of this particular dictionary. I assume it is a dictionary of American slang. I did google and dsog pile it, though and found no information.\n\nThat being said, though, there is an Oxford Dictionary of Slang. more than 10,000 words and phrases considered quirky and official are defined in the 2000 edition.
914180
I have seen it used, but cannot find it in any dictionary.  It seems to be used "as in a liberal sense" or using prudence in a poetic license context.
297974
If you're looking for a definition, just go to the website:\nwww.dictionary.com\nYou can look up the meaning of any word.
468526
There had been several dictionaries written in Latin, English, French and Italian prior to Johnson. Benjamin Martin's Lingua Britannica Reformata (1749) and Ainsworth's Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (1737) are both significant, in that they define entries in separate senses, or aspects of the word. In English (among others) John Cowell's Interpreter, a law dictionary, was published in 1607, Edward Phillips' The new world of English words came out in 1658 and a dictionary of 40,000 words had been prepared in 1721 by Nathan Bailey, though none was as comprehensive in breadth or style as Johnson's.
628082
Uh, I don't know if anyone mentioned this, but ...\n\n\n.... the dictionary?