All articles that coruscate with resplendence are not truly auriferous, what is the simple saying?
88497
All that glitters is not gold.\n\nTo gotcandy below: Sorry, if it is any consolation I knew the birds of a feather riddle but was not fast enough.
830855
What is to be proved? It's not clear.
157797
An exact definition of a good scientific article is hard. It must be clear and novel without missing parts of the story. As well it must not give unnecessary details, but just the core.
353867
Firstly, for 1), you mis-spelled one of the words. The third word should be inculcate -- to impress on somebody's mind: to fix something firmly in somebody's mind through frequent, forceful repetition.\n\n1) Strengthen & Debilitate. (A) The two words are antonyms of each other, since they mean opposite things. (Debilitate means to weaken, which is obviously the opposite of strengthen!).\n\n2) Corrosive & Caustic. (S) The two words are synonmys of each other. In chemistry, the two words mean the same thing: "able to destroy something progressively by chemical action".\n\n3) Munificent & Parsimonious. (A). The two words mean opposite things. Munificent is very generous in giving a lot of money, while parsimonious means very frugal (spends very little or none at all) or ungenerous.\n\n4) Duplicitous & Forthright. (A). The two words mean opposite things. Duplicitous means the fact of being deceptive, dishonest, or misleading, while forthright means direct in speech or manner and very honest.\n\n& finally,\n\n5) The two words that most closely form a pair of synonyms or antonyms are Ouster & Emissary. But, technically speaking, given the definitions of the 4 words, none of the words qualifies as a synonym or antonym of any of the others. Make sure you have correctly copied down the group of words for this one.\n\nI hope this helps. Good luck to you in all your endeavours. Take very good care and have yourself a most joyous day, every day.\n\n\nLove And Light\nCogano
303840
Not "in vein" but "in vain".  In other words, don't call on the name of God in jest or pointlessly.
975550
Sweetheart, different sources use different abreviations. Can you type out specifically what they are? Then I might be able to help you.
812818
Its beautiful, its elegant and it  holds promise. Its true that its some what stagnant in last few years but that doesn't mean we should start disbelieving it. If you cannot test something  experimentally that does not mean that it is incorrect.  You can refute something straight away only when you have proved it to be wrong.  While  thinking about a theory of everything, we must always keep a open mind. We should also for similar reasons give heed to other attempts towards a theory of everything.
867238
You can find Truth in anything. \nI don't think it's any more reliable than anything else.
811482
possibly illogical statement\n\ntransparent means we can see through it
940184
aa easy    misunderstanding
463920
Please restate the question clearly?
640378
there isn't a particle of truth in what you just said
826335
This is just like that watch question right? Well there is a possibility that the perfectly polished rock got perfectly polished by random unintentional events. The divine polisher is therefore time. But then maybe the rock in reality is not actually beautifully polished but we perceive it that way, because of the limitations of the human mind. And maybe when we say that the universe is complex and that complex things need a craetor, maybe it is not complex, we just perceive it that way. There is no ultimately creator.
691522
"Re", Latin -- to return; "Ligion", Greek -- Light. "Religion", to return to the light -- Enlightment.\n\nAll religions are the faces of one single crystal. What is the most important fact is, the Light that passes through that crystal, NOT the rainbow of colours it produced through the crystal.\n\nThe Divine Grace is the Truth, the Truth is akin to the water of a river: the river can bend (religions and sects) as well as possessing waterfalls (religious zealots), but in the end -- the water always remained the same. \n\nThus, one can choose to be a tree next to the river absorbing its water (dogmatic religions), or to be a hard rock inside the river (atheists -- like rocks in the river, they eventually will be rounded, but not changed in essence), even better is to be a leaf that has fallen off a tree upon the river whose travel is to follow the river itself (a spiritual seeker of truth), and eventually the destiny of the river will be reached (Enlightment).\n\nEven if shall the water of the river be tainted by muddy soils (cults and ignorance), the water is always pure because, the soil can never actually be mixed into the water. The soil (lies and ignorances) can only produce a visual illusion of a dirty river but, the water in the river remained by itself as pure -- take a cup of the muddy water and, let it rest (a clear and unbiased mind): the water and the soil will be divided (water/truth is alway on top of the soil/lies/ignorances).
665466
none of the above.  Self-evident is the closest, but that isn't really a compound word, it's a hyphenated word.
772117
It means that just because something appears pretty or appealing it doesn't necessary have any worth.  \n\nThings that sparkle are not all diamonds, things that glitter are not all pure gold.
87628
Gold is not naturally white so I would assume it is false unless coming from a very reputable jeweler.