What is the 2005 chevy astro's gross vehicle weight?
89299
Gross vehicle weight is 5900 lbs, look at the link for much more information....
18563
Same reason I have 350 cu inch small-block chevy engine with corvette tires in a class Impala.  The power and the envy are something you can only feel, not describe.
657243
Too many factors involved to answer this question accurately.  Gearing, exhaust, fuel mixture, all of these play a part in your question.  If you are talking about a little go-cart though, maybe 30mhp.  That would be without any modifications.
72845
use nasa's calculator:\nhttp://www.exploratorium.edu/ronh/weight/
195932
82X5.6X100/Body weight in gm.\nThanks.
41407
Anywhere from 105.00 to 190.00 depending on speed and space
443124
Go to this url, scroll down to the Table for Vehicle Codes and the corresponding GVW range for each code:\n\nhttp://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=GVW+Car+Shipping+Rates+Table&y=Search+the+Web&ei=UTF-8&fr=ks&x=wrt&u=www.arb.ca.gov/msei/on-road/downloads/tsd/Vehicle_Population.doc&w=gvw+car+shipping+rates+table&d=RALxbhbfMf3v&icp=1&.intl=us\n\nNow, that was general information.  If you want specific information, I believe you can obtain this kind of detail from NADA at the following number 1-800-544-6232.  You will have to tell them what you want.  They will tell you how much it will cost (if they have it).  In the unlikely event that they do not have it, they might refer you to a likely source depending on how helpful they are.\n\nIf you could limit your request to some range of years and some few codes (vehicle codes you saw at first url) that would help.  Otherwise, you are actually asking for something akin to an encyclopedia volume.  \n\nWhat are you trying to do?  Put it into lucid and concise English and people will be more inclined to help.
15056
My dad had one.  It was called a "Studebaker". Studebaker Lark, actually. It sat there in our back yard for many years. I don't think it had an ounce of gas in it. Yet, it spun around the Sun all those years, sitting in our back yard.  That has to be a LOT of miles!  OK--sorry.  I just HAD to.  I actually did drive that thing for at least a year when I 17 years old.  You could see how fast you were going by looking through the rusted out floorboards.
487670
None. It takes no power to maintain that speed (on level ground, no friction). The object has kinetic energy (0.5 * m * v^2). Power was required to put it in motion and power can be recovered by decelerating it. If you do the math, the energy is 3551.86 ft-lb, equivalent to 1 horsepower for 6.458 seconds. Answer 1 neglected the fact that weight must be converted to mass by dividing by g, and energy is proportional to v^2.
778402
Mass is a property of matter, it is related to its bulk; how much stuff there is. Weight is the result of a mass subjected to an acceleration, usually the gravity of a planet.  How much gravity a planet gives is a function of its mass, so smaller planet or moons will make you feel lighter (less weight) despite your constant mas.  Also, if you are in orbit, in what is called micro-gravity or free fall, you can even stop feeling any acceleration at all, hence you are weightless, but not massless. In space, you could move very large objects as they have no weight, but you could only move them slowly as your force is limited, and the mass of the object is still there.\nWeight is in direct proportion of the mass of the object attracting you, an in inverse square proportion of how far away one is from the object.\n\nThink of it as pushing a car on neutral on a flat road.  How come it takes so much strength?  Because the car has mass.  In this case, its weight is irrelevant as it it entirely supported by the wheels. But the bulk remains.  Here, the weight manifest itself by hom much compressed the tire and suspension components are squeezed.\nYou can also envision a large ship.  Again, its weight is balanced by the buoyancy of the water -- the weight determines how deep the ship sits in the water.  But try to put it in motion (you have a rope attached to it, and you are on land pulling), and that will take a lot of force.  Sure the ship will move, but that would be very slowly, because the mass of the ship is so great.
133894
Chevy Monte Carlo\nRacing Specifications \nExterior Wheelbase 110 inches \n Length 200.7 inches \n Width 72.5 inches \n Height 51 inches \n Tread-Front 60.5 inches \n Tread-Rear 60.5 inches \n Curb-Weight 3,400 pounds
977370
dumbest thing, easy one, i bought a 2005 chevy cavalier for a commuter car for 10 g's i was so busy with my new job and just having a baby that i did not put it on insurance well u have 30 days to put it on insurance well i totaled it 45 days after i bought it. my insurance covered the liability part which i'm totally greatful for but they did not cover my car! so 10 g's down the drain. i ended up selling it as is for 1400. BIGGEST REGRET OF MY LIFE!!!!
243359
Average weight\nColor\nTaste
151072
Can't carry much in the back of a '95 Camaro.\n\nIt just depends what use you have for the vehicle.
622028
Probably the dodge hemi..I think the truck doubles the top fuels weight. The dragster would probably just smoke the tires. If it was a diesel than for sure the dodge.
248282
Weight. Remove anything that is non essential for performance or safety. Buy a lighter hood. Remove the other seats. Get a racing cat. converter if you havent yet, tweaking the computer with a chip or mod would be your best bet for the cost (about 1000 or less).
679131
5.518 kg/lt. approx...