In military terms, what is the unit of measure represented by a "click"?
91240
1 kilometer, 1,000 meters
762707
America's conversion to metric is the law:http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Metric/pub814.cfm#act\n\nIt's just voluntary.\n\nHowever, all the units you listed are metric.  The prefixes you're confused about are metric prefixes.
216090
Learn the common metric prefixes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix . This is no longer the nonsensical Imperial system; every conversion is just some power of 10 that is directly prescribed by the base unit's prefix.
470776
A unit of measurement for any animals in a feeding operation. Calculated in this report as follows: Dairy cattle - number animals x 1.4 Beef cattle - number animals x 1.0 Hogs - number animals x 0.4 Horses - number animals x 2.0 Sheep - number animals x 0.1 Poultry - number animals x 0.033 Mink - number animals x 0.001.
1065020
Its spelt 'klick' and it is a common military term meaning kilometre (or sometimes kilometres per hour). Its use became popular among soldiers in Vietnam during the 1960s, although veterans of the war recall its usage as early as the 1950s. Its origin is sometimes linked with the Australian Army in Korea.
72896
Newtons is the unit for measure of force
369484
its a measure (metric) of the complexity (or testability) of a program or function...\n\nat its basic its the number of possible execution paths through the code...\n\nyou can use it to compare pieces of code for as a pointer to their logical complexity. \n\nhth
61304
Thy this website out: http://www.convertit.com/Go/ConvertIt/Measurement/Converter.ASP
224476
It's like asking how many seconds in a gallon.\n\nMilliliters measures volume (think liters of soda).\nGrams measures mass.\n\nYou can't compare the two.
201806
Yes.\n\n"The metre or meter (symbol: m) is the SI base unit of length."\n\n"Metre" is just the European way of spelling "meter."
389111
depends what you talking about. It can be in either inches or mm  There are other means of Caliber (see below)
1070714
Foot-pound and pound-foot mean the same thing but I think it comes from usually we write torque as distance time force, so we put "foot" first (instead of force times distance, which is the same but anyway...).  \n\nHowever, the newton-meter (N-m) is preferred in metric, as a few pointed out.  A N-m is also exactly equal to one Joule (J), the metric unit for energy.  \n\nNow a ft-lb could be converted to a N-m ( I have no idea the conversion factor off the top of my head) in which case a ft-lb is equal to a certain amount of Joules, or energy.  \n\nIt seems odd that torque and energy have the same energy-based unit, but they do subtly refer to different things.  Another mechanics formula relate energy as force integrated over a distance.  If the force is constant, then the energy is force time distance = Joules.  Torque is force applied at a distance from a point of rotation, and therefore also coincidentally gives N-m or J as a unit, but is developed in a different way!
119697
It depends if it is acting as a Force or a Pressure (a distributed Force). If it is a force, it has units of N (Newtons, or kg m/s²) and if it is a pressure it has units of Pa (Pascals, or N/m² which is the same as kg/(m s²))
26236
A "click" is just a short way to say kilometer.
861425
The unit of acceleration is metres per square second\n(or) m/(s)^2\n\nThe formula for force is mass*acceleration\nThe unit is kgm/(s)^2 (or) Newton(N)\n1kgm/(s)^2 = 1 N
1065632
There are none.\n\nMetric units all use base ten. We have ten fingers, so the whole decimal system is based on base ten.\nThis in turn allows for easy conversions and calculations between smaller and larger scales as they are all done in multiples of 1000 when using engineering units.\n\nSome imperial units have a finer scale than the metric equivalent, which simply means that an integer in the imperial equates to a decimal place on the metric scale. But not using a decimal place does not make it any more accurate.
210276
March 14th at 23:35 Universal Standard Time.\n\nI'm including a link to the US Navy site, they seem to have pretty accurate info for such things :-)  Most webpages that try to auto-calculate it get it wrong, apparently the math is rather involved and it falls down to careful measurements.