senator's votes on Judge Alito?
78644
They should vote yes.He has the experience and got the top rating from the ABA.Many democrats who have worked with him has said he has integrity and is qualified.The only reason why the far left doesnt want him is because they are afraid they are going to lose their "right" to kill babies in the womb.Yes its a baby I have 2 ultrasound pictures to prove it.Maybe we should stock them up with bi-focals.
769700
43% voted no\nhttp://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/ballot.measures/
598078
For Senator Boxer:\nhttp://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm?CFID=148315&CFTOKEN=10868173\n\nFor Senator Feinstein:\nhttp://feinstein.senate.gov/email.html
710496
Just vote against anyone who is currently a judge.
569347
John Roberts (Chief Justice) and Samuel Alito
1053869
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/a_three_sections_with_teasers/votes.htm
392523
Russ Feingold, as far as I know, is squeeky clean.  He stands up for what he believes in, which is our rights and our freedom, and he doesn't back down even if his stance is initially unpopular.  He co-wrote campaign finance reform, which cuts back against special interest spending.  He also votes against every congressional pay raise, and he has never accepted one.\n\nAs far as I know, also Wesley Clark, Mark Warner, and Bill Richardson.\n\nSomeone mentioned Joe Lieberman.  He's the worst of all of them.  He has no ethics or character, he only looks out for himself.  Lieberman votes against bad legislation that he knows will pass, but before that he votes in favor of ending debate and putting it up for vote.  So is helping it pass but pretending to be against it.  He did that for the Bankrupcy Bill and the Alito Nomination.  Also don't forget that when he ran for vice president, he also ran for reelection to his Senate seat in the same election.
147109
Although I am fairly conservative and a death penalty supporter, I can't say that definitively that his decision was wrong.  The CNN only touches on the allegation of cruel and unusual punishment.  The decision only delays the execution to give the Court more time to decide if it is going to accept and decide whether the intended method of execute constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.\n\nAlito's vote isn't a ruling on the merits of the case.  If memory services correctly, I believe Alito will be the one to recommend to the other justices on whether or not to take the case.  If the Court ultimately decides not to take the case, the stay of execution will be lifted.
790768
In Missouri, I voted for the lesser of two Evils, The Senate race was horrible! Mud slinging and dirty politics. If their was a third party Candidate I would have voted for him. Unfortunately when you vote for the lesser of two evils you still get evil!!
959137
Tim Pawlenty, Republican is being declared the winner by a margin of less than 14,000 votes. I hope that Mike Hatch contests the result. Mike is a good man and the best answer but something went wrong...
66211
It is a regular political process.  True, the parties are bickering as usual, but there has always been controversy surrounding new Supreme Court justices.  If everyone's political party was swiched (Bush would become a Democrat, for example), the exact same ranker would be going on.  Justices are the top echelon of the legal system, so they are very important.  Also, they are appointed for life, so you had better make sure you're picking the right guy.  Unfortunately, Mr. Alito is being confirmed during a particularly nasty period of political polarization, so many of the questions and issues aren't real questions, they're sensationalist propaganda from both sides of the isle.  In case you missed the memo, abortion is NOT the only legal question of the day, yet that seems to be what most of the fuss is about.  Lastly, since they are appointed for life, this man has the potential power to influence American jurisprudential thought for perhaps the next 30 or 40 years.  Needless to say, he'll be making rulings long after Bush is gone, and the next guy, and the next guy. He'll also survive Republicans losing their majority in Congress, then gaining it, then losing it, etc.  So essentially, theres a big fuss because they are getting ready to install someone who is going to effecting law (and by extention politics) for many years to come.  I personally think the Court will be fine with Alito because, unlike the talking heads on CNN and FoxNews who seem fixated on abortion and other trivial matters, I've been watching the hearings live and reading the transcripts (I'm a law student), and he actually seems less polarizingly conservative and more qualified than even Republicans are admitting to.
1037307
It is true that President Bush has strayed from the conservative movement, but the question is, what is the alternative?  To vote for Gore or Kerry?\nEven the things that he has done that are more moderate than most conservatives feel comfortable with are better than what a diehard lib like Kerry would have done.  His contribution to the conservative movement will end up being Alito.\nBut if you think about it, no president is going to do everything exactly the same as you would like him to, because there is too much politics involved.  Sometimes it's just a matter of doing what is possible instead of what is preferred.\nHe has appointed a lot of conservative judges in the appeals courts, but i think that the patriot act was his worst mistake.
731870
I voted first thing this morning!  The lines were pitifully short, and I really hope it picks up.  \n\nThe link below has info on polling places, hours, and sample ballots for every district in the entire country.\n\nVOTE!!!
778001
83:  Yes, although I STILL feel a little torn voting yes, because there are some forseeable problems with this prop, especially the fact that it affects ALL "sex offenders" including people who are caught peeing on the side of the road...those type of mild instances where people have "technically" committed a sex crime makes this prop unfair, but I think the good it will do outweighs the negatives.  I hate molesters, rapists, abusers, etc. so I will vote yes.\n\n84:  YES...clean water???  Hell yes!\n\n85:  NO NO NO!  I am most passionate about this prop.  I'm disappointed to see people voting yes.  By voting yes on this you endanger the small majority of girls who cannot tell their parents because of an abusive home life.  Physical and sexual abuse do occur in homes, and if a girl gets pregnant and doesn't want to tell her parents about the abortion she has GOOD reason for it, usually to protect herself.  Studies show over 60% of girls already tell one or both parents.  If you have good communication and a loving relationship with your child you shouldn't have to vote yes on this to ensure they tell you.  Also, this prop is just a small step that the pro-life side is taking towards getting abortion outlawed alltogether.  It is a slippery slope!  Please vote no.  :(\n\n86:  Yes, I think the money used from the cigarette tax will go to really good things.\n\n87:  Yes.  Save our planet!\n\n88:  No, many schools don't even qualify for the money they claim will be designated to them.  Its a never-ending property tax...yikes.\n\n89:  Yes.\n\n90:  No, it sounds good in theory, but there's a lot of problems with this particular prop.\n\nHappy voting!
1109802
Wonderful!  I agree 100%!!!!  It's scary to think that a moderate Republican wont be elected in the red states and a liberal democrat will...well, just not be elected...  But, I think John McCain is a great Senator, and I think that Governor Pataki of NY is a great moderate Republican, who like us, is fiscally conservative and socially more moderate than most!!  Rudy G. is good too, but I don't really know what his aspirations are or the reason for them.
848838
He is the second longest serving Senator currently in the Senate (behind Byrd of West Virgina)\n\n1. I didn't vote for him as I am in California. Only those from Mass. could have voted for him\n\n2. You don't need ads if you are so far ahead of your opponent that it does not matter\n\n3. Buy votes?  In your opinion.  Do you have evidence to back up your statement?  If so, forward it to the FBI.\n\nRich people, poor people - you only have one vote.  As a rich person you can donate large sums of money to a candidates election fund which gives you more access.
32742
This might be slightly diffrent than that you're thinking of, but you could do a report like "Justice Alito & Women's Rights".  There have been some more radical people who claim that the new Justice is bad for women's rights.  You could present an unbiased report on his record in this area, and maybe bring in some opposing view points from around your city for a roundtable.