Why did "The Beatles" split up?
90584
A lot of internal difficulties.  John Lennon was preoccupied with Yoko Ono, George Harrison did not get along with Paul McCartney's overbearing nit-picking, and their musical interests were heading in different directions.  George was interested in eastern music, John wanted to address social issues, and Paul felt that people hadn't had enough of silly love songs.  Hence the split.
766276
The whole concept behind Sgt Pepper's was Paul's idea. Billy Shears is Ringo's alias in the album but he is not sgt Peppers. In fact none of the four beatles is Sgt Peppers. They are, as the title implies, merely his band.
437219
Pete best  was the original drummer in the Beatles group. They got rid of him before they became famous and got ringo starr in.
1063221
Rory Emerald had a good relationship with John Lennon, and he, along with Paul Simon often got together in New York City.  Emerald only met Paul McCartney recently, at a dinner party.  It is a little known fact that the song “the Long and Winding Road” was originally entitled the “long and Winding toad”, but the Beatle’s manager, George Martin insisted on the change, thinking it made no sense.    \n\nJohn Lennon was fascinated by Emerald’s song writing prowess.  In his autobiography “Imagine Lucy in the sky with Diamonds in strawberry field, forever” he reminisced about Rory Emerald:\n\n“That little bugger, he could write songs, couldn’t he?  One time we (Paul Simon and Rory Emerald) were sitting in the Astoria…this was around…oh…’66, and all of a sudden….the bugger he starts humming this song…and I go wow….it later turned out to be “Feeling Groovy”..bloody marvelous….Another time…I was just strumming my guitar, no words, just a small tune…and Em, he just goes….you say you want a revolution…wow, I couldn’t believe it…I hate to admit I used it….I just couldn’t believe his vision…his talent…Em…he helped me a lot of times when I was stuck….One time I had this song…Come together…I was bleedin’ stuck as to where to take it…I called up the bugger, in the middle of the night…and he came up with…one and one and one is three…got to be good lookin’ cause he’s so hard to see...It just fit beautifully in the song….and Paul Simon…heh, I knew those two were an item <laughs> but, who could blame Paul?  Em had this gift for song-writing and Simon…agh, he just didn’t ‘av it, did he?”\n\nRory Emerald, Paul Simon, John Lennon, and occasionally Elton John were often together, writing songs, discussing words and melodies, and of the four, Emerald probably was acknowledged as the best songwriter.  He had vision, and often suggested important arrangements and music to the other three lesser talents.  It was Emerald that envisioned “a day in the life”, and bridged McCartney and Lennon’s seemingly dissimilar lyrics into the 1967 masterpiece.  \n\nFurther from Lennon’s autobiography:\n\n“We were making Sgt. Pepper and were lost with the words on one bit.  I called up Em, he listened to the words, and created a lovely tune, then suggested a rising crescendo as a bridge between the words, like being stoned…freaking marvelous….You know…we wrote a song “Get Back” in honor of Em and his luv, Harv Lembeck.  He loved it when he heard it”  \n\nAfter Lennon left the Beatles, his relationship with Emerald became more strained, as Emerald started getting more into television and movies, drifting away from his song writing talents.
101752
I love the beatles they are the most influencial bands of the past hundred years.  Yes I  live in a yellow submarine in the land of submarines.
769303
They split a few months ago, but now they're all in other bands, Tom is in angels and airwaves, Mark and Travis are in +44. Travis is also in the transplants.\n\nThey're all kind of involved in the managing and producing of a few new and up coming bands.\n\nI hope that answers your question.
409919
Well in about 1983 there were a series of Beatles song medlies put together by a group called Stars on 45.  Check the Internet for more information.
641672
I doubt it. People who say the Beatles were over hyped...ect. Never lived through Beatlemania. I did. They were a product of the time. There had never been adoration of a music band on that scale before. Every where you went was the Beatles, in magazines, comics, newspapers, radio, TV, Movies. \nKids used to run around the school playground wearing Beatle wigs. Teachers would play the latest Beatles single or Album to the class. You couldn't get away from it (a bit like Jade Goodie I suppose). Girls would recite their Beatles poems to the school assembly (I kid you not). There are bands just as good, if not better nowadays. Don't forget the 'Pop' band was still in it's infancy back then. And as we know, their music STILL has an effect on the music of today.
635722
Definitely the Beatles. When they first came from England, they were nothing more than a boy band of their time. No difference between them and the Backstreet Boys. The Beatles get credit for helping build rock music in the US, when they really founded pop music.
1109842
They've split up now so I think the song is about them looking back on the time they spent together as a band before branching off into solo careers.
994806
Beatles werent that good of a band
897308
I am a huge Beatles fan and I love that song. Now granted it doesnt fit on that album. It belongs on the White Album. That Album has some whacked out songs.
701377
They broke up slowly over time, never really meeting to do their last album.  Just showing up to complete tracks started by someone else.\n\nAfter a while the money doesn't mean as much.  after you got a few million in the bank, you start thinking about enjoying your family and free time, at least for a while.\n\nThey lasted longer than most bands.
1035488
They split and got back together but...now they are split up again.
826532
In My Life...The Beatles.
435369
There a slight bit of differences between UK and US releases. In the 1960s, Beatles was handled by Capitol Records in the US and EMI in Europe. Some songs have been slightly removed or the tracklisting have been altered. Obviously throughout the years the rereleases have changed in both countries. The sound quality of the songs might have been also remastered differntly. A well known difference is the original US Harddaysnight and the British one. The latter I believe has more songs and has the instrumentals found in the film while the US one is just straightforward all the songs. Read around and decide. The Choice is yours..
674721
the stones copied the beatles