what is the formula for callculating the duckworth lewis method in a one day cricket match?
89652
The formula involves complex maths calculations. Ask some maths professor.
1000938
Only One........\n\nLala Amarnath   118  v England at Mumbai in 1933/34    \nSurinder Amarnath  124  v New Zealand at Auckland in 1975/76
941757
Not being totally familiar with the system of scoring in cricket, I have just copied the info I found.  It said, " Match drawn.  North Zone 504 and 65/1  East Zone 295.  Hope it helps
63067
why'd you put this in cricket? i dont know how to help you.
334743
Easy....the batsman 1 hits the first of the 2 balls and runs a single......the throw to run out at the keepers end misses the stump and hits the cap/helmet ( not worn) of one of the fielders/wicketkeeper. thats 5 runs so total scored on the ball is 6(1+5) and the strike changed as they took a single. \nthe last ball is hit for a six when 1 run was needed.\n\nboth scored centuries.and i get 10 points
921122
The basic rules of cricket such as bat and ball, the wicket, pitch dimensions, overs, how out, etc. have existed since time immemorial. In 1727, we first hear of "Articles of Agreement" to determine the code of practice in a particular game and this became a common feature, especially around payment of stake money and distributing the winnings given the importance of gambling. In 1744, the Laws of Cricket were codified for the first time and then amended in 1774, when innovations such as lbw, middle stump and maximum bat width were added. These law stated that 'the principals shall choose from amongst the gentleman present two umpires who shall absolutely decide all disputes.' The codes were drawn up by the so-called "Star and Garter Club" whose members ultimately founded MCC at Lord's in 1787. MCC immediately became the custodian of the Laws and has made periodic revisions and recodifications subsequently.\n\n\nIn 1889 the immemorial four ball over was replaced by a five ball over and then this was changed to the current six balls an over in 1900. Subsequently, some countries experimented with eight balls an over. In 1922, the number of balls per over was changed from six to eight in Australia only. In 1924 the eight ball over was extended to New Zealand and in 1937 to South Africa. In England, the eight ball over was adopted experimentally for the 1939 season; the intention was to continue the experiment in 1940, but first-class cricket was suspended for the Second World War and when it resumed, English cricket reverted to the six ball over. The 1947 Laws of Cricket allowed six or eight balls depending on the conditions of play. Since the 1979/80 Australian and New Zealand seasons, the six ball over has been used worldwide and the most recent version of the Laws in 2000 only permits six ball overs.
950045
Correct formula should be as follows:\n\nE = 1/2*I*w^2
318827
You're refering to "Donald Duck in Mathmagic Land", and as for the equations, I dunno.  But if you imagine hitting a ball straight on (with no english...no spin), then the natural angle (after hitting a second ball) will carry the ball off the tangent at the point the two balls made contact, while the second ball will travel at a right angle from the tangent.  In other words, picture in your mind you just just shot the cue ball at the 9 ball.  Got it in your head?  Now slow it down to the point where the two balls make contact and pause.  Now, if you don't know anything about tangent lines, I've got some info below.  Basically, a tangent line touches a circle (like the balls) in ONLY one point.  When the two balls hit, the first ball will travel along the tangent, while the second ball will always travel at a right angle.  Again, this is WITHOUT any spin, which will either increase or decrease the angle of the path of the balls.  That's one way you can control the balls and use them to your advantage, but you can start with learning the natural angles.  Practice...you'll get it.  Hope this helps :-P
36832
Hat Tricks in Test Matches\n\nBased on all matches up to and including\nTest # 1783: Pakistan v India at Karachi, 2005-06\n\nFR Spofforth    Aus v Eng   Melbourne      1878-79\nVPFA Royle, FA Mackinnon, T.Emmett\nW Bates         Eng v Aus   Melbourne      1882-83\nPS McDonnell, G Giffen, GJ Bonnor\nJ Briggs        Eng v Aus   Sydney         1891-92\nWF Giffen, ST Callaway, JM Blackham\nGA Lohmann      Eng v RSA   Port Elizabeth 1895-96\nFJ Cook, J Middleton, JT Willoughby\nJT Hearne       Eng v Aus   Leeds          1899\nC Hill, SE Gregory, MA Noble\nH Trumble       Aus v Eng   Melbourne      1901-02\nAO Jones, JR Gunn, SF Barnes\nH Trumble       Aus v Eng   Melbourne      1903-04\nBJT Bosanquet, PF Warner, AFA Lilley\nTJ Matthews (2) Aus v RSA   Manchester     1912\n1st Inns: R Beaumont, SJ Pegler, TA Ward\n2nd Inns: HW Taylor, RO Schwartz, TA Ward\nMJC Allom       Eng v NZ    Christchurch   1929-30\nTC Lowry, KC James, FT Badcock\nTWJ Goddard     Eng v RSA   Johannesburg   1938-39\nAD Nourse, N Gordon, WW Wade\nPJ Loader       Eng v WI    Leeds          1957\nJDC Goddard, S Ramadhin, R Gilchrist\nLF Kline        Aus v RSA   Cape Town      1957-58\nERH Fuller, HJ Tayfield, NAT Adcock\nWW Hall         WI  v Pak   Lahore         1958-59\nMushtaq Mohammad, Fazal Mahmood, Nasim-ul-Ghani\nGM Griffin      RSA v Eng   Lord's         1960\nMJK Smith, PM Walker, FS Trueman\nLR Gibbs        WI v Aus    Adelaide       1960-61\nKD Mackay, ATW Grout, FM Misson\nPJ Petherick    NZ v Pak    Lahore         1976-77\nJaved Miandad, Wasim Raja, Intikhab Alam\nCA Walsh        WI  v Aus   Brisbane       1988-89\nAIC Dodemaide, MRJ Veletta, GM Wood\nMG Hughes       Aus v WI    Perth          1988-89\nCEL Ambrose, BP Patterson, CG Greenidge\nDW Fleming      Aus v Pak   Rawalpindi     1994-95\nAamer Malik, Inzamam-ul-Haq, Saleem Malik\nSK Warne        Aus v Eng   Melbourne      1994-95\nPAJ DeFreitas, D Gough, DE Malcolm \nDG Cork         Eng v WI    Old Trafford   1995\nRB Richardson, JR Murray, CL Hooper\nD Gough         Eng v Aus   Sydney         1998-99\nIA Healy, SCG MacGill, CR Miller\nWasim Akram     Pak v SL    Lahore         1998-99\nRS Kaluwitharana, MRCN Bandaratilleke, GP Wickramasinghe\nWasim Akram     Pak v SL    Dhaka          1998-99\nDA Gunawardene, WPUJC Vaas, DPMD Jayawardene\nDNT Zoysa       SL v Zim    Harare         1999-2000\nTR Gripper, MW Goodwin, NC Johnson \nAbdur Razzaq    Pak v SL    Galle          1999-2000\nRS Kaluwitharana, HMRKB Herath, KR Pushpakumara \nGD McGrath      Aus v WI    Perth          2000-01\nSL Campbell, BC Lara, JC Adams \nHarbhajan Singh Ind v Aus   Calcutta       2000-01\nRT Ponting, AC Gilchrist, SK Warne \nMohammad Sami   Pak v SL    Lahore         2001-02\nTCB Fernando, DNT Zoysa, M Muralitharan\nJJC Lawson      WI v Aus    Bridgetown     2002-03\nB Lee, SCG MacGill, JL Langer\nAlok Kapali     Ban v Pak   Peshawar       2003\nShabbir Ahmed, Danish Kaneria, Umar Gul\nAM Blignaut     Zim v Ban   Harare         2003-04 \nHannan Sarkar, Mohammad Ashraful, Mushfiqur Rahman\nMJ Hoggard      Eng v WI    Barbados       2003-04 \nRR Sarwan, S Chanderpaul, RO Hinds\nJEC Franklin    NZ v Ban    Dhaka          2004-05\nManjural Islam Rana, Mohammad Rafique, Tapash Baisya\nIK Pathan       Pak v Ind   Karachi        2005-06\nSalman Butt, Younis Khan, Mohammad Yousuf
1177761
376 against New Zeland\nSachin Tendulkar 186* \nRahul Dravid 153
123515
duckworth-lewis is not used in every case,it comes into consideration only if 25 overs hv been bowled in the 2nd inn'gs. of a ODI. while it has been strongly disapproved by many cricket experts the reason that its still used is no other theory with a btr explanation has ever been introduced in cricket matches that are been suspended due to weather conditions.\n            It basically includes deduction of the 'required run rate' by the team batting second and the position or the run rate of the team at the time when play stops..if it exceeds the 'overal. req rate' then d team battin' sec. wins or otherwise the team dat batted first.\n             the basic funda behind D-L method is to get result and it still is under lot of controversy.
884373
Well in such situations, the match shall be awarded to the side batting 2nd. Because, when the scores are crossed then there is nothing left. You might have noticed, that in this ICCCT (ICC Champions Trophy) in the match between Australia and England, Michael Hussey hit the ball for 4 on a "No-ball" to win the match. But, only the "No-ball" was counted in the scores, because once the scores are crossed, then there nothing left in it. And also, the last wicket of the stumping shall not be awarded. So, the side batting 2nd would win the match by 1 wicket.\n\nRawal.
751132
My dear friend, it´s Steve Waugh who holds this record. He has 25 hundreds out of his 32 in winning cause.\n\nAnd as it was expected, Gavaskar holds the record for maximum hundreds in drawn matches. He made 22 hundreds in Drawn matches out of his 34.\n\nRawal.
18290
This site has instructions.\nhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/sportacademy/hi/sa/special_events/boxing/newsid_3526000/3526378.stm\n\nJ.
1171482
tehre's a formula for it...\nit depends how much you run druing the game
724427
1024 matches. This should be on the mathematic section. Everyone know that an elimination match would always require <number of player> - 1 to finish. \n\nThe simple logic is actually: We're gonna create 1024 losers, how could we create 1024 losers with less than 1024 match? Can't have 1024 losers with only several matches.\n\nEach player would play the match 10 times (2^10 = 1024), and exactly one player would play 11 matches. (to complete up the 1025 players)
456713
In a game of cricket, there are 12 players per side. But only 11 players can bat and/or bowl. The 12th player, usually called "12th man" is just a substitute player. He can only field.\n\nScoring:\n6 runs : If the ball crosses the boundary rope directly without touching the ground it is a sixer\n4 runs : If the ball crosses the boundary rope after pitching in the ground it is a boundary\n1,2,3.. runs can be run before the fielder picks the ball and hits the stumps.\nIf the ball missed the stumps and rolls away, the batsmen can run again. This is called overthrow.\nThe other ways of runs\n1 run for a noball and wide\nlegbyes and byes\n5 runs if the ball hits the fielding side helmet, kept behind the keeper