Who thinks that what Dick Cheny did was on purpose?
88809
Somewhere I hear a maniacal laugh! Muah ha ha ha! \n\nWith that permanent sneer on the Dick's lips he seems like just the character to shoot a buddy while hunting Quayle! Ooops! I mean Quail. Not Dan Quayle?  \n\nFine, what kind of arrogant elite goes Quail Hunting with his 78 Year-old millionaire lawyer pal while he sends YOUR Husbands, Brothers and Sons halfway across the globe to Die in an illegal war? He speaks for the Multinational Corporate Bottom Lines; his Oil & Power Addiction. \n\nAnd what kind of Faulty Intelligence did the Vice President have when he pulled the trigger? What kind of Half-Baked Soldiers are at the top of the organization?
689808
Yes, I read it. Actually, I thought it was about Barry Bonds & track/field stars (especially Marion Jones) and their steroid use. Giambi & others were in there, but I got the impression they were there more to bolster the authors belief that Bonds & Marion Jones were juicing than to attack them personally. The authors seemed to have less animosity for those who admitted it to the grand jury. They seemed to be gunning for those who lied about it, rather than simply those that did it. I think Bonds would have been better off if he had done like Giambi & the others who admitted it to the grand jury; people are more angry that he is a liar than that he used the steroids.
947684
What was with that.... I mean just 5 days ago he was saying that he was keeping  Rummy and Cheney..\nI mean if he was going to can him shouldn't he have done it even 2 weeks ago...that would have let people know he was flexible....\nI am a Democrat, but that seems like a bad strategy and... How do Republicans Feel that got ousted due to inpart .. To the way Rumsfield was going about the prosecution of the war...Any way very good question regarding strategy
819117
Because someone else is guilty!
790963
You know I  have often answered this question in my mind and thought how can Americans see what was happening in the Iran-Contra affair and not just gasp at the implications that were easily drawn from it as it came out. Watergate was a silly, doeflly stupid blunder of cops and robbers played out by wannabees yet it toppled a government and put the first unelected American President (Gerald Ford) into office. On the other hand the Iran-Contra Affair was a well conceived, devious attempt to forstall the will of the American people whose representatives had voted to stop funding the Contra cause. They felt so sure that they were right, that the conspiritors skirted around the law and did what they wanted too. Apply that to any other situation and see where it goes too. The Clinton thing was a set up from the power of the Congress. Warren G harding who died in office in 1921 was caught in one of  the closets of the the White House by his wife "pounding" his secratary Nothing was ever said to the press and she was surely not prosecuted. I mean what is the basis for "High crimes and misdomeanors." in that personal, private, consenting act? Ken Star spent $74 million dollars of our money prosecuting that case and found virtually nothing. now look at the progess of the mischief of the republicans from bumbling thieves to cunning conspiritors. why because they Republicans realized they needed to get work smarter not harder. So they created Republican "think tanks" which made their little mischief so much more effective as the last 40 years has gone by. Ben Franklin, Washington and Jefferson warned us not to be afraid of the outside enemies but be very afraid of the enemies from within. Learn history or relive it.
1055237
Roberto De Vicenzo did it in the Masters (1962 or 1963...off the top of my head I can't remember the exact year), leading to the classic line "What a stupid I am".\n\nHe would have gotten into a playoff with Bob Goalby had he not done that.
140047
Really?? I thought it was Curt Gowdy.
161110
This isn't really an answer...\n\nbut I found it funny that Wittington, at his press conference when he left the hospital, apologized to the VP for what he had gone through.\n\nThe VP shoots someone in the face, and the guy apologizes to the VP.  Wow, that's something.
98070
Since you used the word "accidentally", then it IS an accident. I noticed you keep asking about various people being shot by the Vice President. It doesn't matter who they are...get over it!!!! It was an accident. I would rather go hunting with Chaney then riding with Kennedy...you may be too young to remember that a woman drowned to death while T. Kennedy was driving under the influence of alochol and HE didn't report it til days later.....look it up....Chappaquidick, Mass...
305290
Planksheer, my friend, you're allowing your compassion to show. While obviously not a bad thing, I believe it is misplaced in this instance. McClellan has been a loyal foot soldier of the evil (and seriously stupid) dubya for many years, going back to the Texas statehouse. He knew what he was doing every day he spun the vicious lies and misdeeds of his despicable puppet masters, and he was well compensated for his hateful work. I pity him not.\n\nTony Snowjob (nice one!) is better suited for this sort of dirty work because he's been serving in the same capacity at the FOX nuisance channel (and radio) for many years. He'll lose no sleep over the further destruction of a soul sold long, long ago. These vile people are so accustomed to lying that I don't think they are any longer able to separate out fact from fiction in their own devious minds. The far sadder fact is that a large portion of the American electorate are equally unable to discern between the two. That is the great American tragedy of the early 21st century and the primary reason I shall never call myself a "proud American."
577360
That's a deep thought - NOT\n\nhow totally absurd.   And it's HOLE not WHOLE... for pete's sake if you are trying to act like you have a brain at least proofread what you typed.
865394
I think it was wrong for them to drop the comment..  It was very articulately written, no foul language, I was impressed by it. I would say that a comment posted on a site like that is purely for the expression of opinion. Why it was removed is not really a question..  They dont want people to broaden their thinking to that of your friends' thinking.   What I didn't like about the show was that I had to rewind it (with the help of TIVO) to catch the part where he informs millions of people that the guy passed another independent lie detector test. I barely caught that, so I am quite positive a large number of people missed it as well..  I have my own opinions on the guys innocence..  But as far as the way the public was basically persuaded to believe the guilt, I dont think it was right..  By the way, your friend is amazing with words..
16607
Well, Renee Zellwegger did sight "fraud" as her reason for divorce.  Perhaps his sexual orientation was the fraudulent part of their marriage.
1077510
Of course he got away with it.  No matter what happened, GW would have pardon the creep anyway.  I beleive that Karl Rove and Cheney were directly involved and should be tried for treason.
986227
He is not claiming it.  He is simply deprograming him of all the BS Rummy, Rove and Chaney but in him.\n\nThat is why Baker and Gates are back in the picture.
609655
Is this the same trickster who changed the reasons he invaded Iraq?\n\nI expect him to say next that Clinton and Kerry made him cause the mis-step.
598032
I think for Dan Brown it was about money, but Satan really used it to put doubt in people's minds. Satan is the master of creating doubt.