what does "noblest" mean?what does"racial unconscious" mean?the term "hierarchy" refers to?
91539
1) noblest [1]\n \nPossessing hereditary rank in a political system or social class derived from a feudalistic stage of a country's development. \n\nor \n\nHaving or showing qualities of high moral character, such as courage, generosity, or honor: a noble spirit. \n\n2) Racial unconscious\n\nHaving no awareness of racial groups\n\n3) Hierarchy [2]\n\nA body of clergy organized into successive ranks or grades with each level subordinate to the one above
944857
Being civilized, in my opinion, means "respecting each other´s rights", something done in some countries, such as the U.S., Canada, England, etc. However, in numerous countries in the world (in Africa, in the Middle East, etc.) citizens´ rights simply do not exist. Therefore, an original topic for your project would be "citizenship", which is, no doubt, a mark of "civilization".
243743
I'm not entirely sure of the context of this qoute, but I would guess that it is telling a race of poeople who have been historically oppressed by others that they should work together and try to overthrow their oppressors/ achieve a certain goal because they can do anything when together and they are not inferior, even though they might have been told so by their oppressors.
659192
mag·nan·i·mous  (mg-nn-ms)\nadj.\n1. Courageously noble in mind and heart.\n2. Generous in forgiving; eschewing resentment or revenge; unselfish\n\n[From Latin magnanimus : magnus, great; see meg- in Indo-European roots + animus, soul, mind; see an- in Indo-European roots.]\n\nmag·nani·mous·ly adv.\nmag·nani·mous·ness n.
412747
honorific is a word or expression that conveys esteem or respect and is used in addressing or referring to a person. "Honorific" may refer broadly to the style of language or particular words used, or, as in this article, to specific words used to convey honor to one perceived as a social superior. Sometimes the term is used not quite correctly to refer to a title of honour (honorary title).\n\nHonorifics are usually placed immediately before or after the name of the subject. They may also be used to denote occupation, such as "Doctor", "Father" (for a priest), or "Professor". Some honorifics can act as complete replacements for a name, as in "sir" or "ma'am". Subordinates will often use honorifics as punctuation before asking a superior a question or after responding to an order, "Yes, sir".\n\n\nHonorifics in various languages and cultures\nEnglish honorifics are usually limited to formal situations.\n\nJapanese honorifics are similar to English titles like "Mister" and "Miss," but in Japanese, which has many honorifics, their use is mandatory in many formal and informal social situations.\n\nKorean honorifics vary according to social distinction. The Korean language also distinguishes social differences with special noun and verb endings.\n\nIn Ancient Rome honorifics like Augustus turned into titles over time, see also: Template:Roman government.\n\nIndian honorifics abound, covering formal and informal relationships for social, commercial, spiritual and generational links. Honorifics may be prefix, suffix or replacement types. There are many variations across India. In Gujarati, for an uncle who is your mother's brother the replacement honorific "maama" (long 'a' then short 'a') is used and a male friend will often earn the suffix honorific of "bhai".\n\n\nOpposition\nPeople who have a strong sense of egalitarianism, such as Quakers and certain socialists, eschew honorifics. When addressing or referring to someone, they will use the person's name, an informal pronoun, or some other style implying social equality, such as "brother", "friend", or "comrade".
321820
The guys on PTI always use it.  It's not a sports term.  It means: like or kind.  The guys always say other people aren't of their ilk, really saying no one compares to us.
110632
Homogeneous just means the same, or uniform throughout.  It doesn't necessarily apply to race.  You can certainly have a genetically homogeneous population, but that is a much higher level of sameness than a racially homogeneous population.  Within any racial group there is a huge amount of genetic variability.  \n\nOK, Kurdiatcha's response to my analysis is entirely correct. I will point out, though, that I never said it was anything other than speculation.  At any rate, I hadn't slept in about 3 days, and in that context my analysis made perfect sense to me.  Sorry!\n\nNew theory: I think the perseption that there is more physical diversity in Europe than Africa or Asia could be partially explained by the fact that Europe is geographically smaller.  So it's just that all the different groups are more crammed together and it ends up looking more diverse.\n_________\n\n>>>It was one of the better responses I’ve seen on Yahoo\n>>>answers. It just happened to be incorrect.\nSo I never use the expression "lol," but it seems rather appropriate here.  That was well said.  Thanks : )\n\nYou're probably right on my other theory too.  I should just stop speculating on this entirely.  I do want to point out, though, that the guy who posted the question and said Europeans look more different than Asians is Asian (at least he said so in another question), so I don't think you're entirely correct that people are always more tuned in to difference within their own racial group.  I wouldn't have bothered to speculate on the issue at all (after you shoot down my first theory, that is) except I thought it could possibly hold some tinsy bit of truth because of that.
709260
To me, that word does not describe a color, it's the kind of person one can be. Even somebody who is white can be considered a "N". To me, it means a low-life lazy a.s.s. who makes a living off of hard working people because they think the world owes them something because they didn't ask to be born. Hell, if we all thought that way, NOBODY would think they had to work for a living. NONE of us ASKED to be born!
910408
G'day Richard K,\n\nThank you for your question.\n\nDeep-seated is correct. It means deeply-rooted or deep beneath the surface.\n\nI have attached sources for your reference.\n\nRegards
11168
I am not sure how it became offensive. but one theory of its connotation and origin is that it stands for "fornication under consent of king" so basically back in the days of serious monarchs. the king would approve certain peoples sex. basically giving them blessing to do such an act. most cases both parties weren't exactly willing so the king was basically approving rape. but it was for some purpose that I can't remember.
628451
No\n I find it ironic that you should ask this question in the worst English possible.\nNo one person is inherently superior based on race, sex, creed, color, or country of origin. You are a prime example for your own question.
976744
You probably mean déclassé, pronounced a bit like day-class-ay.\n\nIt means lower-class, beneath the dignity of the speaker.
497720
This word was not even designed to be used in a racial context. Technically, the word means one who is ignorant. It can be applied to any race.
1134014
I think you misunderstood about the meaning of equality here.\nIt simply means nobody is to be discriminated because of his/her sex. It never said that everybody has to be equal in the sense of identical. \nIn other words, to make it more clear what is really meant:\nTreat EVERYBODY equally regardless of any aspect. \nBecause we all know that there are no humans that are 100% identical, not even identical twins...
220987
super conscious \n\nMemories of mental patterns that are shared by members of a single culture or, more broadly, by all human beings; originally proposed by the psychologist Carl Jung to explain psychological traits shared by all people. He theorized that the collective unconscious appears as archetypes: patterns and symbols that occur in dreams, mythology, and fairy tales.
481200
The word itself is a Latin derivative of "ignorance", (though most people believe that it refers to Niger - which unfortunately happens to be in Africa - however, they are called Nigerians).  To answer your questions...\n\n1) I am PROUDLY Multi-Ethnic and a "true" American.  My heritage spans 5 of the 7 continents - from Northern Africa, to most of Western Europe, to Asia, to both North and South Native America's.  (You should see our family gatherings!)  There's no Aborigine or Penguin yet - but I'm working on the latter - LOL!\n\n2) Never!  It's nasty and only proves your ignorance for using it - either colloquially or in hatred.\n\n3) It pisses me off!  Especially when used by African-American youth or other Black people in so-called "friendly" conversation.\n\n4) Most definitely!  See above.\n\n5) Even more so - I am not, have never been and never will be racist.  I judge people on their character - not the colour of their skin, their race, ethnicity, religeon, sex, level of intelligence or sexulaity.\n\n6) Only this.  I am not a religeous person, but I am very spiritual.  I just respect myself and above all, respect other people and nature the exact same way I want to be respected.  \n\nI was raised 1/2 Jewish and 1/2 Catholic, (I should have twice the guilt - LOL!), I believe that god - whatever he, she or it may be, created us to love each other respect each other and help each other in times of need.\n\n7) Besides - everyone's blood is red, (when it hits oxygen - in our bodies it is actually blue!), everyone's s**t stinks and finally - we will all die.\n\nThat's all - hope this helps.
739307
A man of high rank in a feudal society or in one that retains feudal forms and institutions, especially:\nA king.\nA territorial magnate.\nThe proprietor of a manor.\nLords The House of Lords.\n(Abbr. Ld.) Chiefly British. The general masculine title of nobility and other rank:\nUsed as a form of address for a marquis, an earl, or a viscount.\nUsed as the usual style for a baron.\nUsed as a courtesy title for a younger son of a duke or marquis.\nUsed as a title for certain high officials and dignitaries: Lord Chamberlain; the Lord Mayor of London.\nUsed as a title for a bishop.\n\nAs u can see, a "Lord' can b a politician, a cleric, a person of nobility  or simply a landowner..so they "do" different things.\n\nUr ques wasn't stupid, by the way.\n:-)