what is the difference between the gmc 4x4 and a gmc z71?
89755
Z71 is a trim and option package fitted to a GMC 4x4 pickup. I believe it includes slightly heavier suspension and bigger tires. Check with your local GMC truck dealer for details.
135578
the v6(1.8) has 130hp and 115 torque\n\nthe v4(1.6)dohc has 105 hp and 100 torque\n\nthe v4(1.6)och had 88 hp and 98 torque
673422
good question. the one with air cuz it has more mass
778816
I believe it goes something like this:\n1998 XC600 Big Block(*non VES) Wedge Chassis VES=Variable Exhaust System (power valves)\n1998 XC700 Wedge Chassis(*non VES)\n1999 XC600 Big Block(*non VES) GenII Chassis\n1999-2000 XC700 GenII Chassis (*non VES)\n2000 XC600 Small block(w/ VES) GenII Chassis -VES=More Power\n2001-2005 XC600 Small Block(w/ VES) Edge Chassis\n2001 XC700 Edge Chassis(*non VES)\n2002-2005 XC700 Edge Chassis (w/ VES)
135699
im currently builing a 4.3L for my blazer...im putting in comp cams cam #56-460-8..with this cam i had to replace springs and have the heads cut to allow room for the new springs...i have not yet put this engine in yet but will be soon..i also matched it to a 700-e raptor junior transmission......anyway the engine will support bout any cam u put in as long as you machine for it...i cant give any ideas except i would bump up the compression with pistons, cam, roller lifters, roller rockers, intake, exhaust with headers, and a good high stall converter...
1164266
The M-16 and the M-4 are basically the same weapon, the M-4 being a carbine, having a shorter barrel and stock. This allows for better control and quickness in CQB (close quarters battle, room clearing, etc.), while the M-16 offers greater range and accuracy.\n\nThe recoil on the M-16 and the M-4 is almost nil, and allow you to come back on target fairly quick. The recoil spring in the M-16 is almost 18" long, and absorbs the bolt carrier very well. \n\nAs far as one being better than the other, that is determined solely by the mission. A regular infantry unit would carry M-16's, while a unit going into an urban combat situation would carry M-4's.
635346
That's like comparing a Jet fighter to a biplane, performance wise the ZO6 will own the BMW in every aspect, but the BMW will be better appointed and have good road manners.  Still, if you want the best performance car then the ZO6 gets my nod.
420933
MINE IS ONLY A 4X4 AND RECEIVE THEM FINE AND UNHARMED
151091
If you want accelleration you get a higher number gear ratio but it will cruise at a higher rpm on the highway. It will be quicker off the line, but not faster on the highway.\nIf you want a higher top speed you have to use a lower number like 2.19...
114257
The front hubs are sealed units. They do not require service or a repack like the old stlye hub and bearing assembles found on pre 1987 Chevy 4wd trucks.
473045
OHC is single overhead cam(shaft), and DOHC is dual overhead cam. Two cams are more efficient and provide more power than single cams, and this engine configuration typically has twice as many valves per cylinder.
865992
they are realy the same, buy the x1, it is more upgradeable, dont pay extra money for a bike almost the same, the x2 weighs a litle less, not even noticably less really.
81859
Do you mean a quad? That is the same as and ATV. There are also ones that are 4x4s.
217395
IT ALL DEPENDS ON HOW YOU USE YOUR VEHICLE.  IF ITS A BIG TRUCK AND IT'S FOR WORK GET THE C4. BUT IF IT'S A DAILY DRIVEN GET THE FMX OR THE C6.
37930
There is a big difference depending on what you do.  I just upgraded 100 systems at our work place to AMD 4 Ghz dual cores and we have not crashed one yet.\n\nDual cores are great if you are doing numerous things at the same time.  One department where I work edits video and sound.  Before they had trouble having both programs doing stuff at the same time, now one core will be working with the video and the other with the sound.  The dual cores are good at load balancing between the two cores, almost like having two processors in one system.
13460
It just depends on what your going to do with it. If your going to mud ride alot I would say get a 4x4 standard 400 Honda rancher they are tough but not the fastest. If you want fast get a like a yamaha 4x4 400 Kodiak they are fast, or faster than everything I have rode in its class. Every Polaris I have seen or rode either had a super bad resale value, or it broke. Suzuki's are ok but the fuel mixture is to rich going to the filter I have found in the 4x4 400 eigers. So its basically what ever you want to try.
191827
Tibruon, is not really that good if you get the I-4 engine, however if you get the V6 will be better.  it is not because it has more power, it just more stable on the engine and doesn't break down that fast compare with the I-4.