how can muslem fight whith Denmark ?
91163
denmark nowadays is regreting the hell it did very much , the boyttok now made them lose more than 37.000.000.000 $ yet .... and now they really know what's the meaning of doing such things for muslims ... about a war , yes , maybe a new world war will evoke just because of that , our prophet worths really to die for and we are ready to ... and believe me .. the people around the world who are insulting muslim every now and then will pay the price , i mean american everywhere ... GOD be with us ,
107386
U agree with godswondi.... in fact there is interesting Arabic proverb which makes fun of ignorants way. it said "take them away with loud, you ll win"   meaning, if you shout shout shout, they will stop talking and you will win the arguement!!  \nit is the same way.  when Danish apologize and more europe concern, they said it is victory, I read this on several websites such as the comments of readers of Al-Arabia nad those alike.  \nSome said that without force the world will not act.  this is also cited by an egyptian famous writer (Najeeb Mahfooz), but maybe he has no choice only to say that, cuz he was victim of Islamists for his secular publications and criticsm to Islam.  once they attempted to murder him, they stabbed him, as far as I remember, around the neck.
478058
the great victory\nAl Mahdi P.B.U.H. will win and establish Muslim law and give all booty to Muslims
1131936
Go to Ogrish.com and have a look at Muslims cutting off westerners heads,, thats if you have the balls to watch.This answer is aimed at all you liberal lefties, not the guy who posted the question , with whom i agree
530854
first the base of islam for shites and sunnis is the same the difference is so much historical rather than religious sunnis think the leader of islam and muslims must be chosen by free voting shites think that the son`s of Ali ( prophet muhammed cousin and son in law ) are the only one to role , the fact that sunnis and shites are fighting is new as it just appeared in iraq as a game of political balance ( thanks for usa iraqi people survived sadam to enter civil war) that is not a rule not all shites fight sunnis ( there are some shites living in maroc a sunni country and they are peacefull)
158051
Getting back at them over the cartoons aren't we now...\nThe Danish people are peaceful and very intelligent. These cartoons ought to be water under the bridge...\nJust having a little joke there...
894089
No you can't, I agree with what you said 100%. \nIt's scary what's happening in europe, muslims are emigrating there in droves and they bring along with it all their hateful ideology, and if the time comes when they are asked to chose between their hateful clerics whims, or their country... They are gonna chose the hateful cleric.
567089
dear khurram, u r too emotional.\ntry to understand it was not the muslims who fight back, it was so called terrorist? but who knows it could be a well managed plan to win the election by terreorising the voters of america or as well as the other countries.\nwho told the danish cartoonist to make the nasty cartoon? nobody but who got the benifitt?\nislam loves peace not war untill others come to fight.\nwhen muslims will fight back there will be third world war.\nbut again somebody will get benefit.\nso have trust in muslims and keep faith in islam, no bosy got dare to attack muslims.
427897
Denmark. They control Greenland don't they.
85824
The problem is in Danish government which is don't has any politic man who can prevent this tension in relation between 1,000,000,000 muslim and Danish people .\nsecond point is who draw this carton has no enough knowledge in history because if you knew who is Mouhammed you will respect him . \nthird point the problem in freedom because everything in this world has limit no one in this world can talk in everything so you have to respect muslim as the muslim people respect you but the strange thing is how  is this come from Danish people because they are a nice  people . \nhow is the drawer do something like this drew carton about somebody who they didn't know ?Now this is my message to the West: \n\n\n\nThere exists a cultural vagueness in the West. This vagueness results from the presence of two different concepts. The first is a great Western concept that we respect, appraise, and need. That concept is freedom of speech. This is a great humane and civilized concept. On the other hand, there is the great Islamic concept of dignifying Allah’s Messenger (SAWS). The problem arises due to the lack of understanding of the Islamic Civilization and the Western Civilization regarding these two concepts. The non-Muslims cannot value the rank of dignifying the Prophet (SAWS). On the other hand, due to the below-average quality of practical application of freedom of speech, Muslims have a vague understanding of the concept of respecting freedom of speech. \n\n\n\nAccordingly, what is required now? We do not want to refuse the concept of freedom of speech, absolutely not. However, the West should alter the freedom of speech so that it does not collide with the very important Islamic value of dignifying the Prophet (SAWS). Here lies the vagueness and ambiguity. The West understands very well the freedom of speech (which we appreciate) but it does not understand Islamic values, such as dignifying the Prophet (SAWS) and other Islamic sanctities. This is where the Western cultural vagueness lies.\n\n\n\nI clearly say to the West, you have a problem. You cannot comprehend how much the Muslims love Prophet Muhammad (SAWS). You are still unable to understand this point. If you had really encompassed its significance, you would never have accepted what happened. The West, in general, governments and people, does not apprehend that Allah’s Messenger (SAWS) is dearer to us than our parents, dearer to me than my father and dearer than my mother. I am sure that any Muslim woman listening to me now, be her religious or not, will swear on that fact. Just ask, what does Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) mean to you? It is not even necessary to do that because it is so evident, but you may conduct surveys for yourselves, and you will realize how true what I am saying is. Ask any youth, be he heedless or pious; ask any Muslim anywhere, in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Yemen or in Egypt. Ask any Muslim in any village regardless of how religious he is, be he an obedient Muslim or not, a drug user or not, successful in his life or a failure, old or young, ask them, what does Allah’s Messenger (SAWS) mean to you?\n\n\n\nO West, I affirm that Allah’s Messenger (SAWS) is dearer to all Muslims than their own parents. O West, Allah’s Messenger (SAWS) is dearer to us, Muslims, than our children and grandchildren. O West, Allah’s Messenger (SAWS) is dearer to us than our money, dearer to us than our own selves. He is dearer to us than our own countries. O Egyptian, who is dearer to you, Egypt or Allah’s Prophet? O Saudi, who is dearer to you, Saudi Arabia or Allah’s Prophet? O Yemeni, O Moroccan, O Algerian, who is dearer to you, your country or Allah’s Messenger (SAWS)? O West, comprehend that meaning, Allah’s Messenger (SAWS) is dearer to Muslims than their children and their own selves.\n\n\n\nWe can never forget the hadith that I repeatedly mentioned during the episodes of “On the Path of the Beloved”. O West, listen to this hadith[11] as it form
1000309
well, since you're a mulla, you should pray to Allah and he'll do it for you. All this POP3 and reply-to settings are for infidels.
999679
Believe in Islam.\n\n\nwow.  Do I win?\n\n\nwoo hoooooooo\n\n\n.......Poof ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
416241
The Arabs have waged a nonstop campaign since Israel's establishment to destroy it. The existence of Israel is a big insult to Islam.\n\nThe British carved Palestine into Jordan with the remainder staying under British control. The UN voted to further divide the remaining British mandate into a Jewish state and a second Arab state. The Arabs would not tolerate any Jewish independence.
857712
The real battles in America are between the faithful and those who want to make religious expression illegal.  \n\nChristians and Muslims respect the unborn child.  \nLiberals want to make abortion an internationally recognized human right, forcing all nations (including Muslim nations) to legalize abortion for any reason at any time throughout a pregnancy.\n\nChristians and Muslims fight pornography.\nLiberals want "freedom" to indulge in all the pornography they want, even when our children end up seeing it all around them.\n\nLiberals want to outlaw crosses, yarmulkes and the hijab in schools, the workplace, and eventually in public (case in point: Holland).\n\nLiberals want schools to teach that two men can get married, or two women, and that no one should have the right to say there is anything wrong with that.  Christians and Muslims believe marriage is something holy, not homosexual.\n\nIf you are fighting against the Christians, I think you should look again at which side you're on.
180591
sure can\ncolor reproductions can be found here\nhttp://www.outsidethebeltway.com/danish_muslim_cartoons\nonly a couple were even funny
167971
1) Muslims are angry that while any criticism/joking about jews is often labeled anti-Semitic and quickly censored (it's illegal to question any aspect of the Holocaust in many European countries), the same countries are defending these cartoons as "freedom of speech".\n\n2) Many Muslims incorrectly believe that the Danish press, like theirs, is controlled by the state. Therefore, they see the cartoons as being sponsored and encouraged by the Danish government.\n\nPersonally, I disagree with them, and believe that \nAs for Christian outrage, look what NBC did with Will & Grace (Cruci-fixin), as well as how "The Book of Daniel" got axed.\n\nWe need to educate these people about the concepts of freedom, that people may say stuff you don't like, that's no reason to burn stuff.
84016
-From the source quoted below...\n\n"Controversy over the publication of images depicting Mohammed in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten has erupted into an international furor. While Muslims worldwide are calling for a boycott of Denmark and any other nation whose press reprints the cartoons, Europeans are trying to stand up for Western principles of freedom of speech and not cave in to self-censorship in the name of multiculturalism and fear."\n\n"While the debate rages, an important point has been overlooked: despite the Islamic prohibition against depicting Mohammed under any circumstances, hundreds of paintings, drawings and other images of Mohammed have been created over the centuries, with nary a word of complaint from the Muslim world. The recent cartoons in Jyllands-Posten are nothing new; it's just that no other images of Mohammed have ever been so widely publicized. "\n\n<snip>\n\nIt's also hypothsised that the situation was inflamed by the addition of 3 images that were NOT printed by the Danish newspaper.\n\n"Yet when a delegation of Danish imams went to the Middle East to discuss the issue of the cartoons with senior officials and prominent Islamic scholars, the imams openly distributed a booklet that showed 15 images -- not only the original 12 cartoons, but three fraudulent anti-Mohammed depictions that were much more offensive than the ones published in Denmark. It is now thought that these three bonus images are what ignited the outrage in the Muslim world. The newspaper Ekstra Bladet obtained a copy of the booklet and presented the three offensive images on its Web site (though not in an easy-to-find place). All look like low-quality photocopies."\n\nIt comes down to a clash of cultures and an intolerance of world views. Perhaps with a little provocation thrown in. I can't explain the level of violence though. Seems pretty extreme.