What is the most famous Soviet Tank of WW-2?
82223
The T-34/76 Millimeter. It was the first to include sloped armour to deflect shells. Easily mass produced compared to the german tanks.\n\nLater the T-34/88. The same, but incorporated an 88 millimeter gun making it able to break through any armour of the day.
143182
The Allies won WW II because of the armies of the Soviet Union.  Operation Barbarrossa decided the fate of the Second World War.
395350
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanks\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_guns\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uboat\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airplanes
966037
Oh hold on, I have one right here, Next to my collection of WW2 Torpedo and Gun boats.  Can i interest you in a nice little MG42 for seeing off the odd sail boat or two?
101698
A CV-3/33 was a tankette built by Fiat and used most notably by the Spanish and the Italians in the Spanish Civil War.
735632
Tank, plus it doubles as a improvised explosive device
802759
I can not answer your question, but if you contact some distributors or manufacturers of tanks they may be able to help you.\n\nGood luck!
1077416
Panzerkampfwagen VIII Maus (tank) -the world largest tank. Maus is the name of the largest tank design ever built. Designed in 1942 by Ferdinand Porsche.\nBut their were other versions of it,which were bigger and had larger turrets and heavier Armour,but were not completed until the war end.\n\nBangladesh !! Bangladesh !! are you kidding me !!\nDamn! their are some stupid people out their.\n(Sorry just had to say that )
900911
lol at stealth,undetectable,sophisticated and invinceable...lol ty for the laugh.here i'll give you the link, remeber four of them were shot down over serbia by 1970's built russian made anti-aircraft missiles,what do you think the modern russian missles can do?
615757
go on yahoo.com and type in search ((PLANES USED IN WORLD WAR 2))
431430
It's called a Panzerschreck (Tank terror). It was a man-portable anti-tank shoulder fired rocket used by the Germans from 1944 to the end of the war. It was basically an improved version of the American M9 bazooka.\n\nThis should explain a little better.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzerschreck
138665
The K-Wagen, or Großkampfwagen, was a German super-heavy tank that never saw combat due to the end of World War I and the armistace agreement that required that all German tanks be scrapped.\n\nIt weighed 120 tons and had a crew of 27 consisting of a commander, two drivers, a signaler, an artillery officer, 12 cannoneers, eight machine gunners and two mechanics.  It was considered by the German Army to be waste of resources as it was too heavy and impratical to be of use on the battlefield.\n\nAs for how it pertains to the evolution of armoured vehicles, it was the heaviest tank ever made with the original design weighing 165 tons, later shaved down to 120.  It does not, however, hold the record for the largest operational tank as it was never fully completed.  That record is held by the French Char 2C at a mere 69 tons, although it never saw combat itself.
290464
Ok.....a full answer to this would take 200 pages minimum.  This is the stuff graduate thesis are made of....but to summarize.........\n\nYou have to change how you view what WW2 was.  It was essentially a late and last ditch effort for a newly resurgant Russian and German empire to expand territory.  Both countries have always had flexible borders (borders that often change) over their histories.  And Russia in particiular has always sought expansion for warm water ports.  If you look at the geography of it......Germany and Russia are natural rivals.  This is why Russia so distrusted any form of a unified Germany following ww2....Russia has always seen invasions from German territory...even before there was a Germany.  In the early-mid-late 30's both countries were already expanding.....but the Germans were bogged down with Yugoslavia and Poland, and the Russian expansion was bogged down in Finland.  Both leaders also distrusted their militaries....and had to consolidate domestic power at various times.  The alliance/non-agression pact was always meant to be a temporary measure.  Hitler rose to power screaming about communism and socialism.  He was always a direct rival of Stalin.  Stalin and the communist party in Russia saw Hitler as an enemy of the proletariat...and historically feared Germany.  In other words both Stalin and Hitler knew that they were going to be fighting at some point.  The non-agression pact was a mutual agreement to take care of other concerns before this happened.  Germany over came it's problems/obstacles before the Soviets did (they had a 70 year advantage on industrialization, and a more centralized/homogenous population) and broke the Warsaw Pact first.  Stalin's reaction was simple disbelief....and when he did find out the invasion was real he hid for days inside of a bunker and Russia was in chaos.  He finally emerged...and ww2 was fought on the the plains of Russia.  To say that ww2 was a land war between Germany and The Soviet Union would not be too far off the mark.  Both sides benefited from the non-agression pact....but Germany was quicker to take advantage.  As far as appeasement.....the initial German expansion was more bluff than anything else.  THe german war machine could quickly have been stopped in places like Czeck.  To understand appeasement you have to understand the Versailles treaty (the treaty/surrender that ended ww1).  The German State lost territory, had to make reparations, etc.  They had limited military production.  The French (who suffered the worst of ww1) were the primary driving force behind the humiliating (to German thinking) Treaty of Versailles.  The English always felt the sanctions on Germany were unfair and unenforcable.  Because of this....when the Germans entered areas like the Sudatland......the British saw it as fair.  The french lacked the strength or will to fight...especially without international support.  By the time that Germany entered Poland (a mutual invasion with Russia actually), their war machine and industry was far greater...and Hitler's domestic power was far more consolidated.  The Germans already had a huge buffer zone.  Appeasement lead to the inevitable and eventual war with a stronger Germany.
502174
The link below is a comprehensive list of WW2 machines and weapons.  It provides information on where they were used, photos, accounts of their use and is just really spot on for school use.
980068
The Swedish S tank - its so quirky, looks like it means business, but whoever thought of designing a tank with a gun that doesn't move?
217234
The Russians have a new breed of tank with anti aircraft missles that can be launched out the main barrel (mostly for destroying helicopters).\nhttp://www.army-technology.com/projects/t90/\n\n\nThe U.S. military doesn't really do tank battles (although a couple happened in the first gulf war).  Aircraft and artillery can make short work of tanks.  The U.S. feels that tanks are great if they are there, but they are extremely slow to ship around the world.  It takes like 3 to 6 months to move a shipment of tanks from the U.S. to Iraq.  That's why the U.S. has put more emphases on vehicals that can be shipped by air.\n\nhttp://www.army-technology.com/projects/gvp/\nhttp://www.army-technology.com/projects/shadow/\nhttp://www.army-technology.com/projects/stryker/
607762
European\nBattle for Stalingrad, Battle of Normandy, and Second Battle of El Alamein \n\nPacific \nBattle of Midway, Battle of Guadalcanal, and Battle of Okinawa