Who is  better Clinton or Bush >>?
97474
Bush, most definately!!!!!!! This answer has nothing to do with the fact the I like Bush or that I am a diehard republican but the fact that......Clinton is a pig!!!!!!!
116504
Clinton was a far better president in a CEO sense, I have always said he was set up, or why would Monika blab to somebody that she knew didn't like him and why would she keep the dress. \n  To answer your question, yes republicans are loyal to Bush, regardless of his short comings they defend him like he was the flag. However if they were capable of looking at the facts and forming their own answer they would find Bush as incompetant as we do. He has cost to many American lives to be anything other then a criminal.
77600
Actually, Clinton's lies, being all sissyfied and diplomatic just didn't kill americans. The difference between the two is that Bush is accomplishing something instead of holding out as long as possible without actually taking action. Oh, and Clinton was a much better liar. That man was the best speech giver I have ever seen! Bush really sucks at public speaking and should slap his writers.
760504
Nixon and Clinton .......... and none of these two president committed a worst crime than bush\n\nsorry ...... i sincerely apologise and admitted my mistake as an honorable liberal do ..... SORRY! should have studied my history
944501
How many times do I have to explain this? Clinton is a Dem, & therefore not capable of ever being wrong. Bush is a Rep & therefore not capable of being right. \nSee how easy it is when you don't have to do your own thinking?
439210
Frankly, I think anybody would be better than Bush.  He seems insensitive to the needs of the people (or should I say poor people) and he's messing up a perfectly functioning Social Security system, he's determined to keep up the war in the Mid East when nobody clearly knows why we are there.  \n\nI think that you or I or anybody would make a beter president than Bush.
245185
hands down - clinton.\n\nI believe Clinton actually did his job in service of the American people (even with the whole cigar thing). The international community loved him on top of it!\n\nWhile Bush on the other hand is in the service of his investors. Who can really say that Bush (1&2) were actually serving the people.\n\nWhen Clinton lied, nobody died.
570800
Acting on "Bad Intellegence" bush has, with his war, killed countless thousands. Clinton had consentual sex with an of-age woman, then lied about it when he got caught. Obviously, Clinton is the anti-christ.
1144316
you know, that is a REALLY  good question. im serious. i mean, those are two of the most hated people on earth. but when i t comes down to Paris Hilton and her ability to fight with anyone and lose things, or G.W. Bush, who cant tell a war apart from a stuffed tiger tea party, there is a somewhat clear answer. since Bush can screw us all over, and already has, I'd have to go with him. although Paris came so close you'd need a magnifying glass to see the difference.\nI Miss You Clinton...no matter how ugly that other chick you screwd was.
178893
Hell if I know, but there's been worse presidents in history than Bush, as I'm sure we'll have more in the future that will make Bush look like an angel. \nI think people just like to focus on the hear and now rather than the bigger picture of things. \nPersonally, I'd perfer Bush over Clinton...but that's just me.
556441
While I had my problems with Clinton, trade issues, especially, he was intelligent, capable, eloquent and cared about people. Bush has none of those qualities.\n\nClinton also reversed 12 years of deficit spending and created a 7 trillion dollar surplus. Bush wasted it in the space of about 2 years.
992584
You're going to get so many different answers all based on all sorts of different political views...\nBut for me personally, I don't like everything that Bush has done domestically (and no, I'm not talking about the supposed spying program or any of that rabble) but he has been the best during this time of war.\nAs far as Clinton goes...he commited treason. He sold secrets, used presidental order unconstituionaly...but I have nothing actually against the man, just his policies and his actions that he did as president.\nI am a Conservative Federalist...I am for small federal government and for individual state rule. I believe that almost any issue can be handled by the state in accordance to what the people want. So as of right now, I'm frankly mad at all the toe stepping going on in the federal government. This country was founded as a represenative republic and as of right now, this country is moving to the ideology of a democracy. And don't get me started on the activist courts...lol. \nBut as to your question who is better? I would have to say Bush because of my personal feeling on politics and ideology...but others will say otherwise or the same, all for different reasons. I hope you get the reaction you were hoping for.
252930
Both of them are politicians.  Bush appears to be a little more ethical.  He spends like a liberal, but his toys are different.  Both say they have a plan - both light on specifics.  Bush has lousy PR skills.  If I was in the military I wouldn't want Carter, Clinton, or Kerry my boss - they'd get me killed.  Kerry has shown he will stab his fellow GI in the back.
38671
of course ahmadinejad is so better than bush \nanybody know this \nahmadinejad is honest and i think bush is a big lier\nbut never allow policy !!!!!!
693001
Clinton is a great speaker, George Bush always has an ear piece in just like in the Presidential debates. KKKarl Rove is doing all of the talking. Bush is just the mouth piece.
363231
clinton is idiot. bush is moron.
679300
Tony Blair hands down. Believe it or not, I'm not a Bush hater. I voted for the guy. His demeanor is more unsettling than his policy. \n\n(I'm going to ask a question about him)