what is an drug intake officer?
95729
http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/try.txt
1138446
I dont know. What substance are you talking about? This has a table that will tell you.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_testing
267822
Drug: a substance that is used as a medicine or narcotic.
632964
well to be a counselor for drug addicts and those\naffected by abuse of any sort.\n\nwhy? because i have been there and done that.\ni have over twenty years of drug abuse issues -\nnow i am clean. also i was abused as a young boy\nand still working on it. so i can relate to their\nissues.and be a help.
408725
They specialize in substance abuse.
716829
Drug Court Technology Resource Center. The Resource Center is an online forum offering tools and information for drug court practitioners who are creating computer applications for their courts. The Resource Center sponsors two related web sites:\n\n:>peace
941788
Control of substances hazzardous to health\nIt's an information sheet for each chemical product for use, safety etc and is required by law
324345
takes drugs off the street
486269
Control of substances hazardous to health
475645
No.  Gestapo is an acronym for Geheime Staaspolezi, or Secret State Police.  The "green police" are officers or officials in a government charged with ensuring environmental standards are upheld, such as no toxic waste being dumped in the river at night.
906509
BOOF\nWhole BOOF\nNothin But The BOOF\n\nSelf-Appointed Y-Police\n\nSashie Knows Too\n\nWell,,,,,,\n\nWe ALL Know\n\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylt=ApzqkqXFu743_6jhEq27wDoezKIX?show=0e72d78f83683aeea4cac80a2fedf525aa
846113
Police Commissioner \nRaymond W. Kelly
43269
it is level 2 controlled substance
202435
Ask around at the police station.
727483
Hi,  I think your question is rhetorical, but here's my attempt at a serious answer:\n\nIn Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Association (1989), the US Supreme Court held that public employees may be subjected to drug tests when the intrusion is small, and the government interest is great.\n\nSo, a urine analysis would probably be considered a small intrusion, while a blood test would be a larger intrusion.  \n\nFurther, a train-driver, bus-driver, or policeman would be positions where the government interest is considered great (they all could easily harm a large number of people), while an administrator, or paper-pusher's sobriety would be of lesser public interest.\n\nThe court also found that the employees chose a profession where they knew drug testing was likely, the test was reasonable, and it was performed by a professional in a clinic.\n\nBottom line:  It's a case-by-case analysis, and generally the court will consider the degree of intrusion, the degree of public interest, and the reasonableness of the test.
984893
What an area you live in.  I live here, too and this area is heavily monitored by the VA state police, DEA and FBI for these doctors who over prescribe.  They watch EVERY prescription for narcotics.  Every single one.  Who gets it, how many, from how many doctors and how many patients the doctor are writing them for.
909866
Try the UNDOC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) website.  You can also try the Global Drug Prevention Network site.