ok think back before he became goveror........would you have voted him to be president,if?
95465
The idiots will NEVER admit the mistake it was to put an uneducated person in office. Just like they would never admit to voting for a drug addict/alcoholic for president
532499
He sure has decided everything for the outcome of our economy. I am an Independent, and I voted for Bush. I know it was a horrible mistake now. I wont be voting for any Republicans any time soon. I am voting for balance of power in Congress to undue what George Bush has done to America. I have asked the maker to forgive me, and I am sorry, I made a mistake.
670100
There is some doubt in my mind if he was every fairly elected. The first election he was appointed and the second had several states that had discrepancy's. I just hope that in November that we can get a fair election. I can't believe that many people was so stupid that they ever voted for him in the first place, and the ones that still back him have no real reason as to why.
686065
FIRST OF ALL, I voted for George Bush, and would do it again, i think he has GREAT policies, BUT, I will not try to hide the fact that he is not the brightest crayon in the box, like I said I would vote for him in 2008, if he could run again, but he IS a little dumb. lol.
1060927
Yes, I would.  But NOT for President Bush.  I wasn't old enough to vote for him in 2000, but I wouldn't have voted for him, due to my views.\n\nIn 2004, I did NOT vote for him, because he was doing a shoddy job as President.  He won, but I'm sure that he would have NO chance of winning a third term.
1000949
He wasn't the greatest President ever, but at least the economy as growing steadily and people had jobs (including the Prez himself - LMAO). Oh yeah, and I do believe we had a balanced budget once again, didn't we? ; )\n\nI'm no fan of the Democrats nor the Republicans, so I vote third party all the time. But things seemed to get done on his watch.
831519
No I don't.  I think he had the misfortune of getting caught.  He did the right thing by stepping down.   He put the presidency first.  Clinton however put himself first.
1030174
He was voted into office by a LANDSLIDE!!! \n\nMajority of VOTERS wanted him into office!!!\n\nHe is the BEST person for the job!
285218
A lot of "ifs" but here's my two cents:\n\n1. First off, I agree that he would not be idolized in the way he is today. A dead President can do no wrong. No scandals can touch him, no one can judge him harshly on his record. If anything, by dying he secured his place in history and American culture.\n\n2. I do *not* believe that Vietnam would not have happened as some people have suggested. Military assistance to Vietnam (in the form of military "advisors") began under the Kennedy administration. Perhaps, though, it would not have gone that far and Kennedy would have gotten out earlier. You have to take the global situation into account though. By that stage, the US and USSR were "locked in" to the Cold War and every inch of soil mattered.\n\n3. Johnson wouldn't have become President, that's for sure. For what it's worth, I think Johnson got a bad rap and a lot of good policies he implemented were forever overshadowed by Vietnam. \n\n4. Kennedy would have almost certainly won a second term. Hence, no Nixon as President, so Watergate wouldn't have happened either and the Republicans would have stayed out of power for at least another four years.\n\n5. His brother would have probably run after him, but at that stage it would be doubtful if the Kennedys would have enough credibility to keep the Presidency. Some scandal, indiscretion etc would have caught up to them or the country would simply be fed up.\n\nAs others have pointed out, the possiblities are endless - everyone probably has his own pet theory (as with the Kennedy asassination). My gut feeling is that world might have been a slightly better place, not necessarily because I liked him, but mostly because of the low caliber of people who followed in the Presidency.
1057341
His dad....\n\nWho would have guessed this would be the case back then?
1089623
No.  If he could serve another term I would vote for him again.  And if the Democrats do something stupid like nominate Hillary Clinton for president, we are guaranteed to have another right wing president!
744171
doesn't matter what we'd do IF... there's a thousand what would you do if's that you could think about in your mind. the point is, we're NOT in charge, and we didn't make those decisions. and if Bush made the wrong one's, he has to take the blame for that, not have his decisions lessened in their weight by trying to wonder what we would have done. he was elected to do a job, he was trusted to do a job. when he fails, he has to take the wrap. it's not for me to wonder what i would have done because it wasn't be who botched the job. it was him.
665223
abso-fukkin-lutely not!!!  i am not a democrat, but did vote for Kerry because he was (as we already know) the far better choice. so if Kerry had been elected and had fukked up as many things as bush -- well, let's be fair, it is mostly cheney and rove and rumsfeld and others around bush, then i ABSOLUTELY WOULD HAVE TURNED ON HIM. I would be asking for his impeachment just as i am asking for the Team B impeachment now.
430878
Yeah,Good or bad your in the history books.Heck of a reason to be President though.Don't you think Mr.Bush?
1124493
I vote we dig him up and put him back in the office.  He would make a better leader than any we have had since or are likely to have anytime in the near future.\n\nBTW I didn't like his illegal alien amnesty program.
654885
thats a hard question... im not sure to be honest... did you know that he actually was an actor before he became pres?
458330
No, but I think he was a better president that his predecessor and his incumbent.  \n\nPushing that website, aren't you?