List and describe ten characteristics of a Machiavellian ruler.?
93188
This should help you out, lots of information, on this website.. http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince00.htm
1036683
March\n\nThe Fishes\nFebuary 20 to March 20 \nTraditional\nPisces Traits\n\nImaginative and sensitive\nCompassionate and kind\nSelfless and unworldly\nIntuitive and sympathetic\n\n\nOn the dark side....\n\nEscapist and idealistic\nSecretive and vague\nWeak-willed and easily led
542373
MONARCHY if i am the monarch.\nARISTOCRACY if i am an aristocrat.\nDEMOCRATIC if i am a common man.
578276
Republican\n\nGulliani\nMcCain\nRice\n\nDemocrat\n\nHillary\nGore\nKerry
134648
Loyalty\nDuty\nRespect\nSelfless Service\nHonor\nIntegrity\nPersonal Courage
768004
hmm... i could help you a little here...\n\nB1. a country like U.S.\nB2. kings, queens, presidents, bosses, generals, etc.\nB3. library\n\nC1. archived\nC2. monarch? monarchy\nC3. archeologist's library\nC4. architect? there's a missing word...\nC5. architecture\n\ndemosthenes or demos. if without the (s) demonstrate, demon, demolition...\n\nhow did i do? :)
60346
Autocratic, custodial, supportive, and collegial
475770
Patience is the key. Other qualities include things like: Friendly nature, the will to be the best, the capability to lead and focus on the topic in hand.
437036
Emperor Augustus.\n\nThe link below has plenty of interesting information on the Emperor.
127713
I had to write a paper on the Prince not to long ago, and here is a list of the major themes.  You can pick your favorite three.\n\nStatesmanship & Warcraft\n\nMachiavelli believes that good laws follow naturally from a good military. His famous statement that “the presence of sound military forces indicates the presence of sound laws” describes the relationship between developing states and war in The Prince. Machiavelli reverses the conventional understanding of war as a necessary, but not definitive, element of the development of states, and instead asserts that successful war is the very foundation upon which all states are built. Much of The Prince is devoted to describing exactly what it means to conduct a good war: how to effectively fortify a city, how to treat subjects in newly acquired territories, and how to prevent domestic insurrection that would distract from a successful war. But Machiavelli’s description of war encompasses more than just the direct use of military force—it comprises international diplomacy, domestic politics, tactical strategy, geographic mastery, and historical analysis. Within the context of Machiavelli’s Italy—when cities were constantly threatened by neighboring principalities and the area had suffered through power struggles for many years—his method of viewing almost all affairs of state through a military lens was a timely innovation in political thinking.\n\nGoodwill & Hatred\n\nTo remain in power, a prince must avoid the hatred of his people. It is not necessary for him to be loved; in fact, it is often better to for him to be feared. Being hated, however, can cause a prince’s downfall. This assertion might seem incompatible with Machiavelli’s statements on the utility of cruelty, but Machiavelli advocates the use of cruelty only insofar as it does not compromise the long-term goodwill of the people. The people’s goodwill is always the best defense against both domestic insurrection and foreign aggression. Machiavelli warns princes against doing things that might result in hatred, such as the confiscation of property or the dissolution of traditional institutions. Even installations that are normally valued for military use, such as fortresses, should be judged primarily on their potential to garner support for the prince. Indeed, only when he is absolutely sure that the people who hate him will never be able to rise against him can a prince cease to worry about incurring the hatred of any of his subjects. Ultimately, however, obtaining the goodwill of the people has little or nothing to do with a desire for the overall happiness of the populace. Rather, goodwill is a political instrument to ensure the stability of the prince’s reign.\n\nFree Will\n\nMachiavelli often uses the words “prowess” and “fortune” to describe two distinct ways in which a prince can come to power. “Prowess” refers to an individual’s talents, while “fortune” implies chance or luck. Part of Machiavelli’s aim in writing The Prince is to investigate how much of a prince’s success or failure is caused by his own free will and how much is determined by nature or the environment in which he lives. Machiavelli applies this question specifically to the failure of past Italian princes. In Chapter XXV, Machiavelli discusses the role of fortune in determining human affairs. He attempts to compromise between free will and determinism by arguing that fortune controls half of human actions and leaves the other half to free will. However, Machiavelli also argues that through foresight—a quality that he champions throughout the book—people can shield themselves against fortune’s vicissitudes. Thus, Machiavelli can be described as confident in the power of human beings to shape their destinies to a degree, but equally confident that human control over events is never absolute.\n\nVirtue\n\nMachiavelli defines virtues as qualities that are praised by others, such as generosity, co
45570
Here's a really great list... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_forms_of_government
834994
good looking\nunderstanding\ngood cook\nintelligent\nworking\ncreative\nloving nature\ncompromising\naccept things easily\nrespect his other relations like parents, siblings, Friends\nobeying\ndon't have habit of asking the reason\nalways yes & never no
176940
Machiavellian\nof, like, or befitting Machiavelli. \nbeing or acting in accordance with the principles of government analyzed in Machiavelli's The Prince, in which political expediency is placed above morality and the use of craft and deceit to maintain the authority and carry out the policies of a ruler is described. \ncharacterized by subtle or unscrupulous cunning, deception, expediency, or dishonesty: Example: He resorted to Machiavellian tactics in order to get ahead. \na follower of the principles analyzed or described in The Prince, esp. with reference to techniques of political manipulation. \n\nSource: The Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary Copyright © 1997 by Random House Inc. \n-----------------------------------------------------------\n\nMachiavellian\nof or relating to Machiavelli or Machiavellianism \nsuggesting the principles of conduct laid down by Machiavelli; specifically : marked by cunning, duplicity, or bad faith \n\nSource: Merriam-Webster's WWWebster Dictionary \n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMachiavellian\nPsychology. of or relating to behavior in which a person purposely manipulates or misleads others in order to achieve his or her own personal goals. \n\nSource: Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology \n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMachiavellian\nof or relating to Machiavelli or Machiavellianism \n\nsuggesting the principles of conduct laid down by Machiavelli; specifically : marked by cunning, duplicity, or bad faith \n\nSource: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language - © 2001 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated \n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMachiavellian\nusing clever but often dishonest methods which deceive people so that you get what you want, esp. power or control \n\nSource: Cambridge International Dictionary of English \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMachiavellian\npertaining to Niccolo Machiavelli, 15th-century Italian statesman; unscrupulously cunning. \n\nSource: From The Hutchinson Dictionary of Difficult Words © Copyright Helicon Publishing Ltd. 1998 \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMachiavellian \none who advocates or follows the doctrines of Machiavelli \n\nof, concerning, or befitting the doctrines expressed in Machiavelli's The Prince, in which moral considerations are subordinated to the holding and exercising of political power. \n\nSource: ©2000 The Wordsmyth English Dictionary \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMachiavellianism \nThe political doctrine of Machiavelli, which denies the relevance of morality in political affairs and holds that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power. \n\nSource: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.\n-----------------------------------------------------------\n\nMachiavellianism is the term some social and personality psychologists use to describe a person's tendency to deceive and manipulate others for personal gain. The concept is named after Renaissance diplomat and writer Niccolò Machiavelli, who wrote Il Principe (The Prince). In 1970 Richard Christie and Florence L. Geis developed a test for measuring a person's level of Machiavellianism. This eventually became the MACH-IV test, a twenty-statement personality survey that is now the standard self-assessment tool of Machiavellianism. People scoring above 60 out of 100 on the MACH-IV are considered high Machs; that is, they endorsed statements such as, "Never tell anyone the real reason you did something unless it is useful to do so," (No. 1) but not ones like, "Most people are basically good and kind" (No. 4). People scoring below 60 out of 100 on the MACH-IV are considered low Machs; they tend to believe, "There is no ex
828316
Are you a member of eBay? If so just type in Machiavelli and see what comes up in the clothing section. You can find anything on eBay :-)
981565
Okay... here goes:\n\nnegativity\nrudeness\nbeing obnoxious\nvulgar\nghetto-fabulous types\nwannabes\nnarrow-minded, also close minded\nstupidity\n\n... and the list goes on.
971049
Do your own homework...\n\nbut direct characterization is where the author comes out right and says characteristics.  So look for descriptions and introductions of characters in the book.
151448
charisma--to influence others to follow\nwisdom--to know the right thing to do\nintegrity--to do the right thing\n\ni think a good leader has a mix of all of these characteristics.  here's an answer i gave earlier today\nabout the six pillars of character, it's very detailed, maybe more what you wanted...\nhttp://www.josephsoninstitute.org/MED/MED-2sixpillars.htm