Adam and Eve, inbreeding to populate earth, vestigial organs...?
81931
Am I the only one bold enough to say this? ADAM AND EVE WERE NOT REAL. Study human evolution and you will better understand where we all came from and why we are hairless and other things as well. Adam and Eve were a construct designed to explain the unexpainable back before we had the means to figure out the truth. Thats what religion is. Sad but true. Not saying there is no God, but religion is mostly just stories put together over our history to explain things as we began to wonder but stilllacked the technology to answer ourselves. Now we do!
695410
Probably the "God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve" one.  This argument totally overlooks the fact that God created hermaphrodites.  And anyone who believes that God creates humans, will have to agree that God created hermaphrodites, because they were born that way.  So obviously the Adam and Eve story does not cover all the people that God created.
1032517
haha\n\nWell, I guess the next step is gay interracial couples wanting the ability to adopt non-Christian, multi-cultural, multi-ethnic children without the consent of the Church.
612803
A book exists which is called the bible. Do I believe?\nI have serious doubts. First of all, isn't it not scientifically proven that having children with a sibling will create retardation?\nWith this being a fact, how do Adam and Eve populate the earth with only 3 sons?
122743
Hello Sir, \nIt is nice to see people from all over the world asking questions, there is a greag book called The Seven Daughters of Eve by Bryan Sykes. It is a book that uses DNA dating to date almost all European humans back to Seven women. I believe evolution is a valid theory that has plenty of proof.
30988
For the children of Adam and Eve (if you believe in their existence), they do have that bacause they are born.\n\nAdam and Eve were not born but created.\nIf according to Science, they both were not likely to have bellybuttons.\n\nHowever, we as humans and as the greatest creations, we still lack of wide portions of knowledge and forever lacking. Unless we strife hard, hope strongly and pray in every instant, we will get to know and understand some purposes of God's creations.\n\nNonetheless, however much we discovered, the knowledge we have compared to the whole knowledge of God is still like drops of water from a dipped finger into the sea.\nOur knowledge is the droplets left on the finger and the remaining other knowledge is the sea. It still majors so much, way too much for us to handle.\n\nI could not answer the question perfect as perfection belongs to the Perfectionist.\nONLY He knows the most.
591207
I've also heard of studies similar to those you're referring to; I agree 100% w/ you that high population density is a pretty feasible reason for homosexuality and violence, these may well be nature's "control mechanisms" for avoiding LOCAL overpopulation. As far as the whole world being overpopulated, I don't agree w/ you.... food production nowadays, for example, could feed more than 100% of the world's population adequately if equally spread among all human beings; furthermore, global birth rates are rapidly declining, which could actually lead to global UNDERpopulation just a few centuries from now.
954737
All humans are related in one way or another, but not because of Adam, he never existed! it would take more then just 2 people to make the human race flourish and multiply! You would have to be a complete fool to actually believe that there were only 2 people in the beginning. Scientist will tell you that you need at least 15 - 20 of the same species for them to survive, otherwise they would die out.
1108529
ewww..... are you saying...... uh! thats too gross to think about! \nbesides, we evolved from apes!
236789
Steve is Eve after a sex change operation . . . lol\n\nThis is something religious nuts say . . . when talking about gay marriages . . . . "Adam and Eve and not Adam and Steve" . . .
971103
You've got a few misconceptions there.  I'm going to assume you are really asking a question and not just fishing for agreement, so I'll try and straighten them out.\n\nFirst of all, IF man evolved from other primates, it would be more proper to say that mankind arose from -A- primate.  To draw an analogy, if you build a house out of lumber from trees, it doesn't mean there are no trees left in the world... only the trees you used to make your house are gone.  So it is perfectly plausible for monkeys to still be around even though something else might have evolved from them.  Populations become isolated and develop different traits all the time - try comparing someone from China, Iceland, and Africa some time.\n\nSecondly, I don't suspect any evolutionist would say that man evolved from monkeys.  Instead they would suggest that they had a common ancestor, and both man AND monkeys are different from that ancestor, just in different ways.\n\nAnd last is the question of transition.  And transition implies you're going somewhere.  Since none of us know what life will be like a hundred million years from now, it may very well be appropriate to say that EVERYTHING now is in a state of transition from what it used to be from what it will be.  Looking for 'half-fins' and the like is a straw-man argument, though there is certainly no dearth of vestigal organs and DNA around in most species, if you only look for it.\n\nI respect your desire to dispute the validity of evolution.  Most true scientists WELCOME having their theories challenged - it can only make them stronger and get rid of bad ones.  But if you're going to tilt at a windmill, make sure your lance is pointed in the right direction!
972747
She build the hopes and dreams of her descendants. Imagine, if she did not give Adam that fruit. The genetic structure would of entirely changed, there would be a completely differant chain of descendants. Everyone alive today has eve to thank for their existance. If it was not for her. They would have never been born. The genetic makeup would of been completely differant. OOOORAH!!
332140
We would not have ever come into existence. If Eve and later Adam had not partaken of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, they would have never become mortal, they would have lived forever (alone) in the Garden of Eden, and mankind would have never come about.  The entire plan of our Heavenly Father to allow his children to come to earth and gain mortal bodies would have been frustrated.  Adam fell that men might be, and men are that they might have joy.
1112902
The anunaki supposedly engineered modern humans and we are The 7Th genetic experiment on earth. very interesting ideas i keep an open mind on all things until somethings proved  100%. fact .            good question
247602
yes but we screw it all up - evelutionary caches (ie the aboriginies of austrailia) if left alone would eventually differ enough to become a separte species - for better or worse. but with world travel this is very unlikely to happen.\n\neven moreso with modern medicine we are hampering the natural selection process and genetic inferiority and deformity are not lost (i know this sounds heartless but nature has its own plan) we keep the week and infirm alive and in many cases protected form certain natural demise.\n\ndo I believe evelution is at work... yes but in humans its sort of devolution :S\n(sorry went on a rant :P)
891014
As much as I want to believe my religion, I feel that the evolution theory is correct . If the bible was written incorrectly or abridged by the writer of genesis to not include dinosaurs, and the timeframe infered between Adam and Eve and the creation of the Earth were different, then it would be possible that both theories are correct.
1148705
Adam and Eve.  Read your Bible.