Is the Roosevelt incident alien autopsy video truly a huge medical farce or something plausible?
83949
yeah..what buddy above said..I am not from New Mexico but having seen it...It was a very bad attempt to try to make a alien autopsy video. Fake written all over almost right from the start film/video.
413862
Ever heard of the Movie  " The Island of Dr.Monroe " ??\n\nIf NOT ... Ask somebody, because I'd bet Vegas odds that\nthat is Exactly;y what is happening ...
233648
There was a cover-up, but not full blown. NASA didn't have 100% reliability in the video and photographic end to show the World. When problems came up they substituted shots to make it look like a flawless mission, which it wasn't. True there is some glaring impossibilities in some shots, about 95% was shown unedited. But just because some areas were was faked doesn't mean the whole mission was faked.\nSo, Yes they were on the Moon, No, they didn't get the only photo that really mattered in a high enough quality to parade proudly before the whole world watching,(first step off the ladder),because of a bad camera angle and subject in almost complete shadow.Yes, you have a good question.\n\nAdditional thought:\nReleasing this video and stills event were probably "Production" oriented people running the "show".\nThey see information as not necessarily an absolute document of the events, but a presentation.\nThey rely on 2 "rolls".\nThe A Roll which has the primary information on it.\nThe B Roll which can be relied on to fill production errors.\nIdeally you would air only the A roll in a perfect documentary, but that didn't happen.\nB roll info was inserted to fill the gaps.\nSomeone had to make the decision as to whether it was more important to have a documentary or a production.\nIt would have looked very bad to have unusable video and stills for long or important events. "They can send a man to the moon but they can't take a picture?"\nSo we all saw a production.
1182229
I think they did it. A friend of mine directed me to lunaranomalies.com and they had some interesting theories, yet each of these amateur theories were disproved. Look at it this way. In 1969 the americans and the russians were locked in a desperate bid to get into orbit and ultimately the moon. "Journey beyond selene" by Jeffery Kluger brilliantly documented this. The russian premier publicly mocked the americans and their various failures at even hitting the moon with a basic rocket. Enter 1969 and the pictures of Aldrin and Armstrong on the moon. No comment from Russia. They didn't even televise it. If there was even a hint of evidence that it was faked, the russians would have been all over it like a rash. If it was faked they did a really good job. A secret like that could never be kept, and not one reputable scientist has challenged it. All we have are diehard and paranoid lay people looking for attention. If you look up Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin on the net you might find some hilarious footage of the day he left a conference to be accosted by one such person. He knocked him flat with one punch! Hilarious. Selene is the greek word for moon.
499867
I think most people would answer yes. It's kinda like driving past a car accident, we don't want to look, but we do.\nI would probably watch it, I wouldn't enjoy it, but curiosity would definately get the better of me.
879423
Try a tinfoil hat, it will help scramble the signal.\n\nAre you really serious or watching too many x-files reruns?\n\nAre you the one that posted about the bizarre reports and that police didn't believe you?\nWell if this is what you told them about and asked for an investigation no wonder they thought you were crazy.  Did you have the "transmitter" removed, and did you show it to the police?\nI have a distinct feeling you didn't.\nIf I got a call like this one (can't say I have yet!) I would tell the person to go to a dentist and have the "transmitter" removed and then bring it to me to look at.  If there was something there I would send it in for examination and go from there.  I guess the dentist (I'm assuming it was a dentist, unless you believe it was implanted by someone/something else) would be held liable by the college of dentistry for some kind of misconduct and may be liable for civil action by you.  As for criminal charges I can't think of any off hand.
934460
In the world of science, videos don't carry too much weight.  If so, scientists would be arguing about how to classify Jabba the Hut in the animal kingdom.  There are far too many people out there with the skills to fake a bigfoot video and a great number of those people would love to make one just for the fun of it.  A video of the creature by itself is not much proof.\n\nStories of sightings are not too good either.  Witnesses can be deceived by all sorts of things.  Weather, mental condition, physial condition, lighting, alcohol/drug consumption, and injuries are just a few factors that could cause a person to believe that they saw something that was not there or to misidentify something they actually saw.  There are also the witnesses that lie.  A lot of people out there like to tell made up stories and some do it with hopes of cashing in.  A story by itself is not much use to science.\n\nFootprints are not too good either.  Lots of ways for nature to make a normal track look like something else.  Rain, melting snow, or an animal walking abnormally can cause larger than normal tracks.  Once again, there are a lot of people out there faking these footprints for the fun of it or for profit.  Go online and see how many bigfoot casts are being sold.\n\nWhat is needed to prove bigfoot, yeti, sasquatch, or any other mythical creature is a specimen dead or alive.  Nothing else will do.  That is the only way to prove that one exists.  With all of the people out in the wilderness these days, one should have been found dead by now or at least enough bones for identification.  None have been found.  \n\nThink of all of the hunters out there who are drooling of bagging a bigfoot.  Not a single sasquatch head has been mounted over a fireplace.  If anyone would have found one by now, it would have been the hunters.  They are more in tune with the animals of the northwest than pretty much anyone else out there.  If a bigfoot was out there, they would have shot one by now.  Some hunters can kill at a range of up to 500 yards and that is with a bullet that can kill a moose.  Bigfoot would not be able to avoid hunters if they can kill from such a range.  Remember, a deer is an animal that is prey to a lot of different animals so it needs to be able to hide.  Nature gave it the skills to avoid detection.  Yet they are not so hard to find if you know how to look for them.  Wolverines are some of the most elusive animals in North America.  There are not too many of them and they are smart and stay well hidden.  Yet, people can find them even though they are smaller than a bigfoot.  If a wolverine cannot avoid human detection, I do not see how a sasquatch could do it.
8703
there have been several UFO crashes through out the world in the last 50 years..including the United States..and more recent Russia in the eighties with none human bodies recovered from the sites...but it is all the same..they are kept secret for their own gains and advantages..they are real...I have seen them several times in day and night in the sky...anyone who has that kind of government clearance ..to the ufos are under very close scrutiny..they are risking life if any information was to get out..that would be why...we never get any info about area 51..yes it is the greed factor...pity...we all could probaly be better off if those technologies from the downed crafts we given to the world to use..for the good of mankind ..and for our poor poor planet Earth
804082
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8918701386459002474
187085
No one withing the general public knows the answer to this question. There has been a lot of conspiracy around that incident. According to the locals who were directly involved in the "crash", they said yes. According to the military, they say no. \n\nRight now, it will have to be left up to your personal belief. Do you believe that there is undocumented life beyond our solar system? If so, do you belive it is intelligent life? If so, do you believe that life is capable of coming to Earth? \n\nSince the Government will not or cannot confirm either way, there is no real answer to this question.
82403
I think we should approach this with extreme cautio, after seeing that movie the Island, this possibility is allready to close in our reach. Maybe they are allready happening somewhere, who knows. I think this should be remaining illegal and ofcouse for medical use, but it is still to be with extreme caution, where do we draw the line.\nThe future awaits us the answer.
999438
I was willing to give this a reasonable chance until I read this:\n\nOne early morning in '99 Range was returing from Henderson when a low-flying craft dropped a trail right overhead along Boulder Highway. "It covered my car with a sticky web-like coating and I saved a specimen in a jar. Microscopic fiber-like filaments," Range reports\n\nWhat was the outcome of the analysis of this specimen?  If this happened in 1999 don't you think she would've taken it in for analysis by now?  \n\nAnd what does being over 25 have to do with anything?  Are all people over 25 blind or something?\n\nI live in NJ so I can't say that its completely untrue but, I find it hard to believe that so few people have come forward.  A lot of people live in Vegas, I would've expected more people to have said somethin by now and I would expect this to be national news if it were true.  People aren't as complacent as you think they are, when it has to do with their long term health and the health of their children, people are usually very vigilant.
566035
No, I don't beleive that it was a hoax, but I do beleive that there are things that our government has covered up. \n\nI beleive that planes hit the towers because I witnessed it and bodies were found, etc.\n\nI beleive that it was not a plane that hit the pentagon but one of our own missiles. Why...I'll never understand. There were no bodies of anyone on the plane and the damage to the pentagon does not coincide with any impact of a airliner of that size. \n\nI beleive that there was no crash in Pennsylvania either. There is too much evidence, or should I say lack of. There was never any wreckage found. No bodies! No anything but a few strategically placed pieces of fabric. \n\nWhat horrifies me is what happened to all of these people?\n\nI do not beleive in conspiracy theories at all, but after watching this. It has changed my life forever. I see you have a link to the 1st one. Here is the link to the 2nd edition. It's long but well worth it. Please watch!\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848\n\nI lost 2 very dear friends that day. I will never forget, it breaks my heart that things like this happened. \n\nI just wish the government would release the rest of the information and finally tell us the truth!
1166933
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came
100194
If you're Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or a neo-Nazi or something, it's a myth.  Here on planet Earth, however, it's a horrifying reality.  I've seen actual footage -to say it's horrific is something of an understatement, I think.
588373
are you a doctor? or a med student? did anyone see it? :D
583471
I've seen the trailer, and I'm fairly sure its a hoax.. The story just doesn't seem believable, and the trailer definitely features bits from other films.. I spotted "Catch Me if You Can" in there, and other bits seemed familiar. Sorry!