what are salary and benefit of an nfl owner?
92883
The owner doesn't draw a salary -- the owner (of any business) profits from his business (if it is run well).  So, if income exceeds expenses then they get that difference as their income.  If expenses exceed income they make no money.
1064087
If you can talk the other owners in your league to put up some cash, you don't need a site.  I am in a league where twelve owners pay $130.00 each and we pay out once for draft fines(~$50), three times during the regular season for different tasks(~$100 each), and $700,$200,$100 for the top 3 in the playoffs.
68464
My guess is Michael Vick, who last season signed a 10-year $130 million dollar contract with the Falcons. (Compare that to 1986 when Dan Marino became the highest paid NFLer - at the time - with a 6-year $9 million contract!) Highest $$ per year though may be different.
537954
NBA players make a lot more than NFL players.  Plus the money is guaranteed while no one in the NFL has guaranteed contracts.
888733
not sure try to google it the best would be nfl.com but you gota pay
630050
You would have to talk to the current owners and see if they would be willing to sell.  The Lakers are worth 529M, so you might be able to buy it for 800M-1B because the owner might not want to sell the team at all.
121500
Publicly-traded companies such as Walt Disney (Research), Comcast (Research) and Time Warner (Research) (parent of CNN/Money), have all bought and sold teams in other sports. But they are prevented by NFL rules from owning a football team. \n\nTwo recent teams did have their own publicly traded stock -- the Boston Celtics and the Cleveland Indians. But both teams sold only a minority stake to the public with no opportunity for voting control. And the shareholders didn't benefit as much as the majority owners when those teams were eventually sold. \n\nCheck source for complete info:
447594
I'm a pro player. 29 years old and been in the league for 9 years. When you turn 30, it is a belief that they player loses some coordination and becomes expendable. Also, the contracts that we sign are back loaded. When they get to the end of the deal, their salary cap number becomes so high, they have to sever ties and rely on a younger player with less experience to fill the void. It is a rough business to make a living in. It is especially tough on families. I've moved twice and it is nerve racking. Then, on the flipside, some NFL teams love the older players and they find a home for another 3 to 6 years. Its a growing trend but that is the NFL.
199021
I think the salary cap creates parity in the league.  It makes it more interesting to the fans because different teams have a chance each year.  This strenghtens the NFL as a whole.
1006658
well considering most of them are retired from football before there 35yrs, i think its alright. they earn it because you have to give up so much to consentrate on football when your younger to make it, so those that do make it, deserve it!
897280
They maybe greedy but not overpaid. If you view it as a business like the owner, if you pay player x this amount, player y sez why can't i be payed the same? Domino effect. The owners then pass it on to the fans who pay to see their teams. Capatilism, supply and demand. If no fans show, then no money etc. How much does the best tiddle wink player make? If you heard that your friend was making more money than you doing the same job would you want the same pay? Its what the market can bare. Granted the pro make money most of us would like to make so it seems alot but i'd rather be the guy who pays them, would'nt you? Does anyone complain that Gates and Buffet make the money they do? They have more, they just don't flaunt it like the pros do.\n\nThe pro athelete only looks ridiculous when they ask for pension plans etc when us dolts obtain our own pension or 401. Dumbest request by pros is when they ask for part of the gate receipts....where do they think the owners are getting their money in the first place to pay them? If they want the gate receipts then let them have it but they must also pay for maintenance and the employees who work there and pay the loan to the local government.
863418
much higher revenue for the city.\n\nThe group that bought the Texans and Browns paid roughly $700 million each for the teams.  NFL revenue sharing is over $100 million per team per year.  Ticket sales, memorabilia, concessions, etc. all generate money that is poured back into a community.\n\nThe city of St. Louis spent hundreds of millions of $ to build a stadium before the Rams even left L.A.  Obviously they would not have spent the money if they were not convinced that it would have a huge positive impact on the city.
766664
Beyond the team and all players, coaches, owner(s), it is now up to the owner(s). The league will pay for up to 150 rings, and for up to 125 pieces of jewelry for the losing team. http://www.scbb.org/fun/superbowl.pdf
223132
The Players union and the NFL owners must reach an extension to the collective bargaining agreement before the start of free agency of the final year on the current agreement.  If an agreement is not reached by the start of free agency, then after this year (the last year on the current agreement), the next season which is the 2007 season would begin free agency without a salary cap.  Therefore teams could spend as much as they like on players and small market clubs would be at a competitive disadvantage.  The salary cap always is changing as more revenue is being generated through bigger TV deals, advertising, merchandise etc. The reason the current agreement hasn't been extended is because the players union wants 61% of the total revenue and owners only want to offer 57%.  There are more details about owners receiving revenue from other sources outside the collective bargaining agreement and that has been a source of debate with players and owners.  I could give you even more details but I believe you have now been brought up to speed and have more insight and understanding than most fans of the NFL.
782766
If it is a team fine, then it goes to the Company or owner of the team to be used as management of that company (team) in repairs, uniforms, or just to help the team. If it is a league fine, then I believe that they say it goes to the NFL or whatever league for the betterment of the league.  Prob still goes into the commish's pocket, but for their sake, I am sure they would say that it is donated or used for advertising or some crap like that.
894894
Commissioner Roger Goodell (2006-present) is the owner of the NFL and replaced Paul John Tagliabue as of this year.
358166
Yeah, these questions are always hard to answer, and I don't think it is possible to give a correct answer.\n\nCertainly, the Bears merit consideration, but what about the 1972 Dolphins?  What about the recent Patriot teams?  \n\nBest by wins and losses?  By which season's league rules?  \n\nSo many other questions.  What about the effects of performance enhancing drugs?  \n\nMy thought is that I would take today's athlete over any from previous decades, merely because of the advances in training technology and knowledge of the sport, such that a star of old is inherently disadvantaged when compared to the players of today.\n\nIt is very hard to make these comparisions.  So, I think the benchmark should be a relative comparison of how much better were they than the other teams in the league.  \n\nSo, I give the Patriots more credit in the fact that they had such a dominant team for 3 of 4 years, yet did so in a league in which parity dominates.  The salary cap and revenue sharing of today's NFL ensures that teams are on roughly an even footing.  Contrast this to baseball where the Royals $40 million payroll is expected to compete against the Yankees $200 million.  Is it any wonder why the Royals lost 106 games last season?\n\nSo, in my estimation, the Bears certainly could be considered one of the best teams ever, but it is all subjective.  It is much easier to say that they are probably one of the 5 best teams ever.