Is George Bush the only Chief of State in the world who Is not fluent in ANY language, "American" English incl
80168
How do you feel about President Clinton being the only Chief of State who doesn't know what the meaning of the word "is" is?
703779
No it is very easy to understand.  It is just too difficult for our moronic leaders to understand.
511058
The same reason George Bush can't say "Nuclear";\n\nIGNORANCE!
66751
Nope. Never has, although there have been attempts in the past to make English the official language.
543865
No\n\nFirst, he is a silly-girlie man\nSecond, he was not born here\nThird-he cannot pronounce his own states name.  It is not a vegtable, it is the name of a state
441041
It was in spanish and Bush can't speak spanish.
556403
Bush doesn't even know what the word IS means\n\nso there is no way that he is multiplicty in one
969927
Never in American history has the Commander in Chief had to be subjected to the will of the American people in terms of military planning and organization, and the same still applies here today.  This is based solely on the fact that the citizens do not know about the full situation over there, the secrets, the confidential war plans and discussions with the generals.  \n\nAnd yet the American people do have a voice, and it was expressed last week during the elections, which will place limits upon Bush's presidency.  This is the American voice, and it has been heard in Washington, I'm sure.
332109
Nope. English is way too difficult of a language for people that are up at 2am in the US to try to master.  Chances are if you're up right now you're drunk, on drugs, and insomniac, work shift work, or live in a different country that doesn't use English as their primary language.  Either way, the opportunity of someone like that having a good job where correct English is a priority is probably long gone.  Now that brings up the next question.  I'm  here at 2:30 am answering your question.  Which of the above is my problem?
1070600
Pres. Bush from the USA.
982055
Bush and the mexican governmento have a lot in common. Maybe explains why his spanish is better than his English. \n\nDarryl S.
519750
Don't believe anything neil hippy wrote, cuz he is 100% wrong.  Prime Ministers and Presidents are both "head of states", in most cases.   In china they have both, and I am not really sure what each is responsible for.   USA and UK have Pres and Prime Min, respectively.  Their duties are almost identical.   Both countries have a legislative branch that are simular to each other, ie   house of commons/house of reps, and house of lords/senate, etc.   \n\nHippy neil wrote american presidents think they are kings,  and that is completely false.   Bush cannot do a thing without some liberal butt muncher snacking on his arse.   A king or queen or dictator can do as he or she pleases without congressional/court approval.    So hippy neil,  nice try,  go back to civics class.   This time try and stay awake.\n\nSo the President and Prime Ministers have very simular duties/responsibilities.   Not all governments operate identically, but its close.    Keep in mind,  some countries have leaders that call themselves "president"  but they are really dictators.   Like Saddam, or Omar Kadaffi's fried chicken (KFC).
915812
you wasted some keystrokes there, Cracker. You could have simply asked "what do you think of Bliar?" <sic>\nthe answer is simple - it's the same as Bush's middle name, except they spell it "Walker" over there, not "Wanker".\nHas anyone ever bothered to point out that in the English-speaking world, "Bush" would translate into american as "beaver"?
330522
No.  Cheney is Palpatine.  Bush is more like Jar-Jar, but he speaks less English than Jar-Jar.
216948
Tacitly, no; the American Declaration of Independence has never been accepted by the United Kingdom.  However, as you will recall, there was a great war fought between the American colonists and the UK; the colonists won.  Afterwards, there was a Constitutional Convention and then the creation and execution of the US Constitution.  Today, the UK recognizes the independence of the US and are allies.  So, no, QE11 is not technically or otherwise the Queen of the US.  As to your question, would it be better if QE11 was leading our country rather than President Bush; well, I would just about think that any person could do a better job than President Bush.
655196
Texas residents claim that's how they all talk down there.  Rubbish.  When you are the leader of the free world, you should probably use proper english, not good-ole-boy english.
522407
No we don't have an offical language. I must state however, that our founding father came from one nation. Here is the list, and they are all English. The founding fathers spoke English and that is how we ended up this way.\n\nDelaware    • George Read • Caesar Rodney \n • Thomas McKean  \n  \nPennsylvania    • George Clymer • Benjamin Franklin \n • Robert Morris • John Morton \n • Benjamin Rush • George Ross \n • James Smith • James Wilson \n • George Taylor  \n  \nMassachusetts    • John Adams • Samuel Adams \n • John Hancock • Robert Treat Paine \n • Elbridge Gerry  \n  \nNew Hampshire    • Josiah Bartlett • William Whipple \n • Matthew Thornton  \n  \nRhode Island    • Stephen Hopkins • William Ellery \n  \nNew York    • Lewis Morris • Philip Livingston \n • Francis Lewis • William Floyd \n  \nGeorgia    • Button Gwinnett • Lyman Hall \n • George Walton  \n  \nVirginia    • Richard Henry Lee • Francis Lightfoot Lee \n • Carter Braxton • Benjamin Harrison \n • Thomas Jefferson • George Wythe \n • Thomas Nelson, Jr.  \n  \nNorth Carolina    • William Hooper • John Penn \n • Joseph Hewes  \n  \nSouth Carolina    • Edward Rutledge • Arthur Middleton \n • Thomas Lynch, Jr. • Thomas Heyward, Jr. \n  \nNew Jersey    • Abraham Clark • John Hart \n • Francis Hopkinson • Richard Stockton \n • John Witherspoon  \n  \nConnecticut    • Samuel Huntington • Roger Sherman \n • William Williams • Oliver Wolcott \n  \nMaryland    • Charles Carroll • Samuel Chase \n • Thomas Stone • William Paca