I'm working on an intelligence test, and this is the only one I can't get. 9 P in S A?
83821
Wait - you're asking for an answer on an intelligence test?\n\nBrilliant!
193919
I've taken a couple of online IQ tests (I don't remember if I've done the iqtest.com) and my scores seemed to be off from my 'real' scores (as of 2nd grade) by about 10 points in either direction.  Ten points is actually less than the standard deviation on an official IQ test (between 15 and 25 points, depending on the test), but may be the difference between the 25th and 50th or 50th and 75th percentile.\n\nEven 'real' IQ tests are not really very acurated measures of intelligent.  They test vocabulary (which is very much a reflection of education, and very much not a reflection of ability), and not creativity (which is probably the most important aspect of intellectual ability - accuracy is worthless without originality!).\n\nBTW, I generally score between about 125 and close to 140 on those things.
1157976
0000, 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006, 0007, 0008, 0009, 0010, 0011... etc, etc  untill u get to 9998, 9999\n\ntry it out, might take a long time but one combination will work :))
423306
None.\n\n1,186\n2,93\n3,62\n6,31\n\nPost the original problem. Maybe you've done something wrong.
529075
Hey seriously I dont't understand "t0.05(9)=2.26"\n\nHowever I did some of the calculation based on what I remember.\nMean of the sample = 2.2\nVariance if the sample = 9.56\n\nTo find the t-value, using the t formula,\n\nt = (2.2 - 0) / [9.56/ sq root(10)]\n= 0.7277\n\nWhy 0? Because you want to test whether the sample mean is 0. O meaning there is no effect on the B.P.\n\nSince sample size is 10, degrees of freedom is 9.\nLooking at the t-table, at 5% sig, the t-value is 2.262\nat 10% sig, t- value is 1.833.\n\nNote that we are actually looking at the t-value where the p-values are 2.5% and 5% respectively. Here we divide the level of sig by 2 because the null hypothesis is an equal sign.\nNull Hypo: sample mean = 0.\nSince it is 'equal' sign, we will divide level of significace by 2. Remember this.\n\nSo you can see that actually our t-value is smaller than the 2 t-values and we do not rej the null hypo. \n\nConclusion: We do not have enough evidence to say that the stimulus have a significant effect on the B.P. Not being able to rej null hypo doesn't mean that we accept null hypo. So we cannot claim that the stimulus doesn't have an effect on the B.P. This point is impt. \n\nHope you understand my workings. Any mistakes pls point out to me. :) I did this based on what I remember. :)
478142
Hi there,\n\nIs it possiple you left out a P?\nThen the answer is PROGRAMME.\n\nHave fun puzzling! ;)
526341
You see: \n9\n19\n29\n39\n49\n59\n69\n79\n89\n90\n91\n92\n93\n94\n95\n96\n97\n98\n99\n\n\n\nThat counts 20 9s.\n\nI did not see other answers. When I saw your question, I smiled because I know that you did mislead us as 9, 19... for avoiding the nervous nintees.\n\n\n\nThank you for this nice Question.\n\n\n--- LeeeN
1134607
I know what you mean.\n\nThe letter 'A' is not in the spelling of the numbers 1 - 100. \n\n\n\n--- LeeeN
600543
Hmmmmmmmm!   Sounds like you are trying to get us to take your IQ test.  I hope everybody gives you the wrong answer.  Then you will take your own test for your own score.......
1090524
it would be 22 choose 4 =22!/(4!18!) minus the ways in which Mr and Mrs Math can be together = 20 choose 2 = 20!/(2!18!)\n=(22.21.20.19)/(4.3.2)-...\n...(20.19)/(2)\n=((20.19)/2).((22.21/4.3)-1)\n=190.75/2\n=7125\nSorry had to two line one bit due to Yahoos dodgy cutting off of things
719950
You are placing the letters MMMIINU into seven boxes, one per box.\n\nThe Ms can go in C(7,3) = 7!/(3!4!) = 35 ways.\n\nThere are four boxes left, and there are C(4,2)=6 ways to put choose two locations for the Is.\n\nThen there are two boxes left, and exactly 2 ways to choose where the N and U go.\n\nSo the total is 35*6*2=420.
518621
It's better to find out what the average score was for the particular IQ test you took, as all IQ tests are different.  They try to be as close to a standard as possible, but not all tests are created equal.  I scored something over 140 on one, but it may have been easier than the test you took.  I know that 120 was considered above average for the test I took.
71269
I missed only one question and that was because some colors look exactly the same to me and received a 166. My fiance missed more including math and received a 161. My take is do not worry about it. It is an inaccurate scale of intellect.
677062
those Internet IQ tests are skewed\nso don't go thinking that you are a genius
764765
My guess is that you are trying to use this method to find out if  a character is a letter or a digit. The name of the method is wrong. and the wya you are using it might be wrong too. It is Character.isLetter(...) or Character.isDigit(...) Hope that helps\n\n\nChiney
773196
Mean: 113\nMedian: 108-116\nMode: 108-116\n\nThe mean was the hard one, I actually took the middle score from each range (eg 90-98=94) and multipled it by the number of times it occured (eg 94x6=564) and added all 5 (564+2266+4816+3388+1170= 12204). Then divided it by the frequency (6+22+43+28+9=108). Total (12204/108= 113). It's impossible to find a mean of a set of ranges, you need exact figures.\n\nThe mode is the most commonly occuring range, the median is the central range. These figures can't be accurate without the full actual IQ scores. But based on the figures provided, the mean, median and mode are as I stated above. If you provide the exact figures I'll work out the exact mean, mode and median.
303069
Do a confidence interval calculation and see if the confidence level for the data you've collected is above that required for 98%.\n\nI can show you how but given your other questions, it's clear you haven't really done any work on this yet and you're just looking to get someone to do your homework for you.\n\nLet me know if you still can't do it after you've tried a while, and I might help you out.