what was the old science of politics?
80828
After the Enlightenment movement in Europe, Politics became more scientific because it required thinking and included theory
867681
Set up displays of old science methods as compared to modern ways, showing how some are true to this day, and others are not so true or best methods.  example of wind tunnel experiments and developments in aviation, pulley and rope systems, auto transmissions, or just everyday things, like kitchen and cooking methods and improvements.
1074333
50 years ago the people in the Republican party would nowadays be Democrats....and vice versa.\n\nThey all switch sides and flip flop.  All politicans are scumbags.
134356
Because the Constitution is obsolete, it was written over 200 years ago. Other anachronisms include the Electoral College, etc. \n\nWith politics as they are, it will NEVER be corrected.
181740
political????\n oil,relgeion, bush
831517
In the later 1700's, there were two separate ideologies and the 2 separate groups formed political parties. As Parties, it was easier to identify where candidates stood on issues. And of course, as a group, they coud band together for strength.Those parties have changed lots over the years-the Federalists don't exist anymore the idea that the executive branch's power shopuld be checked by the legislative branch continues in the Democratic party. Lots to learn about here-try doing some internet searches and read more about it. The search terms "political party" and "history" work nicely. \n\nBartering I believe is coming back. You see that category on Craigs List and I know people that trade services. And if you search online, you'll see a number of sites come up...
223837
Well, I'm not going to do your homework for you, but here are a few observations.\n\nFirst, much of the communication to the government is artificial, "canned" by special interest groups or political parties.  Nowadays I'm sure it's mostly electronic, but when I was involved in politics in the 60s and 70s, the pre-printed post card was the method of choice.  If a particular issue was selected as worth "writing to your representatives," the group involved would print up post cards with the basic message they wished to convey, and all an individual would have to do is sign it.  Usually they were already addressed to the senator or congressman involved, or to the president.  Some people do, of course, write personal letters or post cards or, nowadays, email messages.  These are collected by the staff of the lawmaker involved, and tabulated for "for" and "against" on certain bills pending before the congress.  Little if any of the detail gets through; just thumbs up or down, so to speak.\n\nThen there are letters to the editors of newspapers, and there are demonstrations and rallys.  All are more-or-less artificial, with the possible exception of certain letters to the editors.  And those, of course, are sorted by whether or not they are printed by the newspaper.  The larger demonstrations may have some effect, but they are not about how important the issue is, but how experienced the organizers are.\n\nThe one thing that seems to move lawmakers most is donations to their campaign funds.
335405
I don't think it should necessarily be taught as a political science, because "economics" is a very broad term. Granted, macroeconomics such as trade, the federal budget, the stock market, are very closely related to public policy. However, economics also covers much smaller scale issues such as a how to operate your own business. In this regard, it is not necessarily all that political.
605929
How can you hate politics?  Politics today are the same as they have always been, that is, politics is a system of societal intercourse which we use to find solutions to challenges so that we simply don’t shoot each other.  Politics are not evil in and of themselves.  \n\nCertainly some people use the political system for personal gain without regard to compromise and solutions to societal problems.  However, the fault is not with such people, but the fault is with those who do not become active within the system.  Opting out, as some do, is the sign of a beast that is dead, non-effective.  Proactive participants interact with the system, and thereby with other people in the system to make needed changes.  Those who do not become proactive may as well not exist.  It is like a person who has become sterilized, they will never have an impact on the genetic growth of the species.
782546
It's just you.  Politics has always been really intense. In fact, there were many, many times in our history when it was much more intense (e.g., Segregation, Vietnam, Women's Lib, Isolationism between WWI and WWII, Reactions to Cold War, Gas Crisis in the 70s, fights between Reagen and Congress in the 80s...) Welcome to being a citizen!
417265
TO ORGANIZE THE POLITICS AND ITS ORGANS IN SCIENTIFIC WAY \nAND MAKE IT ACCORDING TO NEW AND IMPROVE WORLD.
313946
doctors and anceint methods used back then
847046
American politics is often described as a pendulum.  It swings this way, and then that way, and back again.
25144
I read the book myself about 5 years ago at school. Its all metaphors and political commentary. The link below will provide all the information you could need.\n\nAs to the above answer "do a google", you will find the 95% of the questions on here coud be solved quicker are more effectivly with a google search by the user.
815553
Go into the Chemistry section in Yahoo Answers. You are in the Political section.
493008
My favourite when I did political science: http://www.currenthistory.com/
572126
The New Deal, drawing heavily on the experiences of its leaders, reflected the ideas, and was influenced by the programs, that FDR and most of his original associates had absorbed in their political youths early in the progressive era; had absorbed while serving in the Woodrow Wilson administration; and had absorbed holding other offices in the 1920s.\n\nIn the United States of America, the Progressive Era was a period of reform which lasted from the 1890s through the 1920s, although some experts use the narrower time frame of 1900 to 1917. The reformers advocated the Efficiency Movement. Progressives assumed that anything old was encrusted with inefficient and useless practices. A scientific study of the problem would enable experts to discover the "one best solution." Progressives strongly opposed waste and corruption, and tended to assume that opponents were motivated by ignorance or corruption.