what is the meaning of hear ye that the Marshal says when the justices enters?
92300
It calls the court to order, recognizes that judge is now hearing cases, and for everyone to sit down and be silent(or get thrown out by the Marshal)
969552
It is merely the name of that court,  areas of the nation or states are divided into "circuits" or areas where that court has jurisdiction.\n\nIt comes from the old days when a judge would ride a horse or wagon and travel a "circuit" of varoius court houses.\nSimular to preachers who did a ciruit of churches.\n\nIt merely means the area the court covers as divided by the government
417983
That trial was ultimately heard before the Supreme Court. Their opinion is at the site below. The ruling goes over the District ruling in detail.\n\nEdit:\nDon't pay for that crap in the site above. It's just a poorly written essay about the cases, not the opinion itself, which is available freely below.
84435
It's "voir dire". \nThe phrase "voir dire" derives from Middle French; in modern English it is interpreted to mean "speak the truth" and generally refers to the process by which prospective jurors are questioned about their backgrounds and potential biases before being invited to sit on a jury.\n\nSample Questions to be asked to prospective jurors:\n1. Do you have an opinion concerning the alleged facts in the case?\n2.Are you related to anyone involved with this case?\n3.Have media accounts of this case caused you to form an opinion about the defendant?\n4. Have you ever served on a jury before in a criminal case?\n5. Do you believe our system of justice is fair?\n6. Do you understand that the prosecution must show "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the defendant is guilty as charged?\n7. Will it be hard for you to disregard evidence the judge rules as inadmissible after you've heard it in open court?\n8. Do you believe that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty in this court?\n9. Is there any reason you can't sit as an impartial juror in this case?
434543
When someone states, "here, here" they are saying that they are in agreement with the speaker/group.  \n\nIf they said, "hear, hear," they would be asking others to listen or saying that they are hearing something but without offering condonement or agreement to/among the group.
1011018
I am assuming it is for the State of California.\n\nTry this:\n\n138.  (a) Every person who gives or offers or promises to give to\nany witness or person about to be called as a witness, any bribe upon\nany understanding or agreement that the person shall not attend upon\nany trial or other judicial proceeding, or every person who attempts\nby means of any offer of a bribe to dissuade any person from\nattending upon any trial or other judicial proceeding, is guilty of a\nfelony.\n   (b) Every person who is a witness, or is about to be called as\nsuch, who receives, or offers to receive, any bribe, upon any\nunderstanding that his or her testimony shall be influenced thereby,\nor that he or she will absent himself or herself from the trial or\nproceeding upon which his or her testimony is required, is guilty of\na felony.
2428
No one enters suit justly, no one goes to court honestly; they rely on empty pleas, they speak lies, they conceive mischief and bring forth iniquity. \n\nTherefore justice is far from us…Judgment is turned away backwards, and justice stands afar off; for truth has fallen in the public squares, and uprightness cannot enter. Truth is lacking, and he who departs from evil makes himself a prey.
199420
I think the expression is "up and at them". At least, that's what I've always heard. I can see where if you are just waking up it would sound a bit different.
1165319
I think it basically means that a judge will follow precedent (judgements in former cases) rather than interpreting the law as he &#92; she sees it. It was a big point during the recent Supreme court nomination process , specifically regarding Roe vs. Wade.
417513
What you are asking is what former president Clinton meant when he actually used that phrase. I wish I knew. I am fairly good at interpreting the doublespeak of lawyers and politicians, but I could never get this one either.
741490
See US Constitution:  Bill of Rights.\n\nAs written, not as perverted by activist justices.
273638
I want to be called, so I can go in there, look the judge in the eye, and say:\n\nI know that, as a juror, I will have the power to nullify any law I consider unjust, by finding the accused not guilty even though he broke the law. \n\nCommon Law rules, as adopted by the Founding Fathers, centers around this and other similar powers, which can prevent many kinds of corruption in the legislature and judiciary.\n\nUnfortunately, judges are too corrupt already, and will reject you if you simply KNOW ABOUT the law.\n\nThis means that I will be able to do my Civic Duty, by striking a blow for justice, the Constitution, and Common Law, and yet won't actually have to get paid four cents per day to sit for some trial.\n\nMore info at:
477147
It means that she's misquoted the phrase "I am woman, hear me roar," from the song "I Am Woman" by Helen Reddy.\n\nhttp://www.lyricsdownload.com/helen-reddy-i-am-woman-lyrics.html
318446
Ask the Clerk of the Court.
263996
MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court \n\nMR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, concurring. \n\nMR. JUSTICE CLARK, concurring in the result.
1108927
It means that you may file a new suit on the same cause of action.\n\nYou may file a motion to reconsider the ruling.  This usually requires that you have new information that you did not at the time of your last hearing.\n\nYou may appeal the ruling to a higher court.  In an appeal you need to show that the judge had faulty legal reasoning.   They do not re-evaluate findings of facts on appeal.  You will need an attorney to do an appeal properly.
773045
I think this is the phrase you intended: "Aut vincere aut mori." This translates: "Either conquer or die."