whats the best year 2000 car thats good to tune up and was under $15000 when the car came out?
81256
Honda civic hatchback
274477
Mazda Miata.  Its racing success in SCCA should solidify its position as your obvious choice.  It is an extremely underrated car and yet, it is the only one in your price range that is capable of autocross, track racing, and drifting while being a fairly newer car with less maintainence concerns.
305091
I have a 1994 Acura Integra and I replaced my engine with a JDM B18 VTEC\nthis is the most powerful engine I would put into it.  If you're crazy drop in an H22 (2.2L Accord engine)\n\nGood luck!
72624
well it all depends on what you like better. i have driven the new gti and its very quick, it is turbo charged, front mount intercooled and direct fuel injected so u can get more out of it by just chiping it i've herd of up to 280hp to the wheels. It handles really well it now comes with independent rear suspention the previous gti's did not. The new civic is basic the same they just arent turbo charged and come in a coupe style only now. The new civic is nice the new 2.0 frome the rsx-s will make the civic pick up too. But its still an n/a motor you will need more work to get the power up there. Dont get me wrong i own a older honda with a b-serise swap and it is quick. But i really think vw has put alot of love into building the new gti, its alot better then the the last gerneration. But to really decide you have to go drive them yourself. Go into your local dealers and take a test dirve. Good luck.
118162
I like the rsx but, i've heard the Evo is one fast *** car to go against.
1069971
Ford GT40 (550 Hp, 500 Lb/ft Torque, $150,000) Because its cheaper and I'm not made of money............lol
401704
If drag racing is what you mean skip the imports, you can dump thousands into them and not get out of the 13's 1/4 mile.  A late model Camaro or Mustang is the way to go for cheap speed, lots of parts on hand...400+ hp is easily attainable for very little dough.  If you must go import get a six-cylinder turbo car (300ZX, 3000GT, Supra) and upgrade the turbo, can be very quick but also very expensive.
64081
My first car was a 1975 Plymouth Duster.  I bought it from my parents for $2000.  They still make fun of me to this day, saying I got ripped off by some scam artists :-)\n\nI drive a 1992 Toyota Pickup today.  It's simple, yet functional and gets 30mpg.  Also, my dog can stick his whole head and neck out the window and it's easy to yank him back in if I need to do so in a hurry.
351486
1997 McLaren F1 Other then it is a beautiful vehicle, lets take a look.\n\nEngine: a Mid Longituinal 6064 cc / 370.0 cu in BMW S70/2 60 Degree V12 \nPower: 467.6 kw / 627.1 bhp @ 7400 rpm\nTorque: 649.4 nm / 479.0 ft lbs @ 5600 rpm\nTransmission: Transverse 6-Speed Manual w/AP Triple Plate Clutch\n0 - 60 mph 3.2 seconds\n0 - 100 mph 6.7 seconds\n0 - 1/4 mile 11.6 seconds\nTop speed: 240.1 MPH \n(Compare to the 2002 Ferrari Enzo @ 217.5 MPH the Lamborghini Murcielago @ 205 MPH or even the newer 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren @ 207.5 MPH. Few are faster [Most notably the 2006 Bugatti 16/4 Veyron @ 253 MPH {0-60 in 2.5} $1.2 Mil] But NONE are classier. )\n\nCan you say "whiplash"???\n\nThe price on this little darling, depending on IF you can find one, is around 970k. \n\nI will say that a close runner up is the 2004 Maserati MC12, It's not as fast, (205 MPH) or as expensive, 770k. (Not that I could afford either!) but it is a beautiful machine. The TVR Tuscan (the car from the film Swordfish) is pretty cool too. It's right up there. I mean, 0-30 mph in 1.73 (0-60 in 3.8 seconds) isn’t too shabby, huh? Okay, so it's fast and nice, but I still like the McLaren better...Most of the time. \n\nMy do I have to pick just one? Ugh!
255015
The SRT-4 has Fun factor written all over it! Fast from the factory and insanly fast when modded.Simple to mod,easy to maintain and fun to drive.\n\nThe Gt , big motor, V-8... nuff said.\nthrow a supercharger on that bad boy and call it a day!\n400HP!
848655
Oh are you going to get a whole lot of different opinions on this one, including people who have no idea what a muscle car is and will just tell you the Camaro or Mustang because it's all they can think of (or have heard other people say)! LOL\n\nHere are some of my favorites for your consideration:\n\n1966-1969 Chevelle\n1968-1969 Nova\n1969 Road Runner/Super Bee\n1966-1969 Charger
1156924
Buy...my fav sports car.....Lamborghini
1179041
"I recommend, a New 2006 sleak aerodynamic fuel efficient fighter Stealth Broom."\n\nBah.  Just wait a couple of months, and the new 2007 ones will be coming out. ;)
75508
A standard 22-250 is pretty fast as is.  I would just go with the fastest factory load you can find.
348815
very good question and impecible taste on cars... ebay. i have found b20b's for half price they'd regularly be.that or go to functions.com
501855
i would rather have a 1956 chevy belair 2 door post with  a 283 (best engine chevy ever made) never liked 57 and i had a 68 camaro rs/ss sharp little car but didn't like it, the 64,65,66 impalas were nice i had a 64 ss and also 65 ss but not with a 396. the 396 was one of the worst eng didn't like the rattle in them 348 was ok and i liked the 409. 327 was great and also the 350 was ok 1963 impala was also a very nice car 1967 chevelle i had was one of the best cars i ever owned my favorite car was 1973 pont venture
171115
Cant tell you about the civic (although I understand they handle quite well) but I own a Mazda 3s and the thing handles beautifully. Best car I ever owned, and Ive had lots. I cant say a bad thing about this car. Be sure to get the sports package with the 2.3 liter engine though...much quicker and much more fun to drive. Also cant go wrong with the Mazda dependibility wise either. They'll last forever. Ive also got a 16 yr. old 626 with 170k miles and it still runs awesome! Happy driving!