the determinants of human capital accumulation based on job training?
83577
"Human" capital? Do you mean what determines one's income level?  Is it based on education and/or job training?
927850
education helps find a decent paying job
298118
If you are talking about production of an employee. I think computer skills and proper training and or skills to do the job they were hired to do. Companies assume you have computer skills but the company also forgets to properly train, provide the right tools or find out if the person has the proper skills to do the job.
584440
GED? High School Education? Bachelors? Masters? PhD? MD?\n\nReally depends. My stepson is 22, has a job paying $45K, plus a bonus of up to another $45K (and that is first year out of college). \n\nNo degree - no ducats.
628348
Yes there is a rule in the U.S.A., Germany England, Mexico\nAlthough the main difference is that there the proportion is medium and there is greater scope in the general class of people.There the jobs are assigned according to merit,where this is not the case in case of our country.
678057
each job has variable salaries based on where and in what capacity you are working. sorry, can't give you a number.
1052079
The market, unions, and associated demographics decide the worth of certain job classifications.  Jobs in demand pay more than those that aren't; it's as simple as that.\n\nNow, PANCHA, what is the REAL point to your asking of this question?...;-)
335365
"Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth" is a book chapter by Nicholas Kaldor in the book titled "The Theory of Capital" edited by F.A. Lutz and D.C. Hague.  You can purchase "The Theory of Capital" at http://www.amazon.com or http://www.alibris.com\n\nAlternatively, you could check out the book from your local public library.
337778
"The root of management education may be traced to the Training Within Institute (TWI) scheme introduced in the mid-forties, for the supervisory and foreman level employees in the industries as well as the in-company training programmes organised by many British firms."\n\nSmall extract from the first site below
36630
In some cases, because younger people are willing to work for less, and the pre-conceived idea that someone just out of school is a better candidate. But, and I speak from experience, if you show interest in keeping up with and learning new things, computer programs, etc... and if you have lots of energy, it's not that bad. Next time I will post my personal list of why an employer SHOULD hire an over 50 employee.
97251
Yes. The overall benefits are also positive.\n\nThe people who gain are the people who understand the new rules of competition and the master imperative of continuous learning. Continuous learning and the importance of knowledge have been written about since the early 90s by writers such as Peter Drucker. The people who will succeed under globalization or in the new global economy are the people who understand and master technologies and also perhaps more importantly, who understand the value of knowledge and intellectual capital in today’s rather cerebral economy. (Where knowledge accounts for more and more of the growing value in products and services).
1178484
Employer.  One of the lessons I learned in management training years ago was hire people who can replace you.  Being an employer gives you that opportunity.  It's great to be able to give people challenges and watch them succeed.
412985
It is almost impossible to say with so many variables to consider. For example, with no experience, you may get approximatly 8 to 12 dollars an hour depending on the skills that the company is looking for and if you have those skills, the minimum wage of the state that the job is located in is a factor, and even the company doing the hiring will be a variable, due to how they stand financially. There are other variables to consider as well. The best way to know, is do your homework and do as many interviews as you can before choosing the company that is right for you. If you need money now, take the best one that you can and work towards a higher goal later.
335705
This depends on the follwing factors:\n\n1) Number of years of service.\n2) Age at retirement\n3) Rank at retirement.\n4) If disabled on the job, this may also be factored into retirement pay.
1005264
To get better paying jobs.
889427
Advantage=  learn time & money management, how to plan ahead, how to follow directions, how to make practical, independent judgements affecting others, develop customer service skills, develop self discipline, pride in becoming self-sufficient, learn unexpected skills, meet new challenges, reach out for greater responsibility, train someone else, supervise someone else, be there to handle an unexpected urgency., discover working isn't as hard as it seemed when you were unemployed., learning to enjoy the early morning hours.\nDisadvantage= may be temporarily stuck with monster boss from he--, may have boring job, pay too low (move on!).
123248
I'm glad you included the term "effectively."  I think this is another area where academic training is less important than on-the-job training.  It may be the case that large corporations are looking for an academic degree to go into their human resources department, but certainly small companies cannot afford to be so picky.  You might try the management training programs in a retail company (a department store or a fast food outlet or something, which has a fast enough turn-over to need a very active human resources department), and see if you can't get a job just on the basis of your good record in high school, and perhaps a willingness to do some time in retail sales to learn what it's all about.\n\nIt's an important field that has a lot of pretty mediocre people cluttering it up.  Good luck!