How are Dress Codes conected to the American Constitution?
82101
I guess you could make the argument that the way people dress is a form of expression (be it religious or otherwise) and thus requiring people to dress a certain way or discriminating against those who dont might be in violation of the first ammendment.
264555
I agree about our Constitution.  This nation was the first nation in the modern world where it was openly acknowledged that no one possesses perfect foresight, so our body of laws had to be flexible enough to accommodate future Americans and their future issues, but solid enough and based upon firm enough principles that they would not be changed on a whim.  The principles upon which our system was founded were (and are) so cutting edge that they have become a model for many countries where liberty and equality are at issue.  Under the ideals upon which this country was founded, it is easy to see why we are held up as the model against which other countries measure themselves.  However, the ideal and the reality sometimes are just far enough apart to reflect duplicity to those looking for c hinks in our collective armor.  Suffice it to say that ours is the most effective system operating for most intents and purposes, inconsistencies notwithstanding.
109752
read the constitution and ammendments
866153
Obey the laws and maintain alligance to the constitution.
1154296
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
819445
Our Constitution is what makes the USA great.  As stated by the people who wrote it, the rights guaranteed by our Constitution are the rights given to us by God, and it is the government's job to see that those rights are not taken away.The United States of America is not only the greatest Christian nation, it is the greatest of all nations on earth. If every country in the world would adopt the US constitution and actually live by it, they would all be much better off than they are under their inferior systems.
668901
The dress code encompasses the wearing of a similar uniform.It says nothing about the cleanliness of its components, not the fit of the said uniform.
906444
The simple answer is this: nothing trumps the Constitution.  If, however, the Constitution does not specifically detail something, it is up to the interpretation of the Supreme Court.\n\nIn your case, the Constitution protects the business's right to refuse service to anyone not wearing a shirt.  In the past, though, their right to refuse service to anyone has been checked by not allowing discrimination on the basis of race, gender, etc.\n\nIn short: you're out of luck unless you can convince the Supreme Court that shirtless people deserve the same protections as other protected groups.  Good luck with that.
345593
did you try doing a search on a country first like japan and traditional clothing and do each country one by one? or look up in wikipedia or do a yahoo search on tradional clothing you do know about like kilts in scotland or the robes a juge wears or uniforms , convict clothes,women covering face or everything except eyes,\nnonverbally our clothes can communicate our social status or authority, our religious beliefs or belonging to a group,professional attire communicates innocence,respectability,good,orange uniform or jailhouse jumpsuits communicate angerous guilty bad and a females attire is often misinterpreted to communicate her sexual experience or promiscuity level,
112009
black tie= cocktail attire\nbusiness suit= business attire
71936
Dress codes would be good for self esteem of some students.  It would remove the provocative dress styles inspired by MTV.
760169
America is a free country until the Democrats wrest full control.  So until then a person can wear what they wish.
913292
If this is for an essay and you have time for research then you use a treatise on constitutional law. There are also resources online.\n\nThe US Supreme Court rules on the federal constitution. State supreme courts (in NYS the Court of Appeals -- their supreme court is the lowest court of general jurisdiction, following English practice) rule on state constitutions. Here's an example where a state law on double jeopardy was stricter than the federal rule: http://www.uniset.ca/naty/maternity/192P2d449.htm (in federal practice, two different sovereigns can prosecute the same offense, California law (only) is different).\n\nCiting a US Supreme Court case is easy. You go to http://www.lexisone.com (free registration required) or to http://justia.us (uses Google searching rules which may be more familiar to you) and you look for what you want -- key words, etc. Supreme Court cases are cited in the pattern "Smith v. Jones, 123 U.S. 456 (19XX)".\n\nMost Supreme Court constitutional law cases are famous: Roe v. Wade (abortion), Loving v. Viriginia (miscegenation), Lawrence v. Texas (sodomy), Miranda v. Arizona (right to warnings upon arrest), Gideon v. Wainwright (right to counsel). And so on.
1012898
YES, the US Constitution is made up of the Articles (5 practical, 2 procedural) and the Amendments (27 total although there are only 26 active since prohibition (18) was overturned by the 21st.).  The first 10 Amendments are called the Bill of Rights.
246547
Uniform with what? Are you talking about the various state laws?\n\nState law makers were always free to make whatever laws that they wanted to govern their citizens. The ratification of the thirteenth amendment put a stop to making laws that infringe on our inalienable rights, so to speak. Ever since then the only restriction on the various states' laws have been a test of conflict with federal laws or if they unconstitutionally violate the rights of the citizens.\n\nNow, however, some states are working to make their laws more similar to other states' laws that serve a similar purpose by adopting model laws, which they are also free to amend if they want.\n\nThe bottom line is, if a person doesn't like the laws in one state, they can go to a different state that has different laws.
200614
Read the constitution it's explained
763421
It is not in the constitution,  actually no law is in the constitution.\n\nThe laws, and state codes are listed in the state codes.\nThis will be a many thousand page book, and made up of several books to include consumer, traffic, criminal and dozens of other areas.