What is the purpose of the political organization and economic organization?( How does it serve the nation?
81972
http://www.philipdru.com\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com\nhttp://thestressblog.com\nhttp://www.un.org/\nhttp://www.antiwar.com\nhttp://www.kaos959.com
883633
A Quasi Autonomous Non-Governing Organisation.\n\nIt's basically a committee with power!
350231
Socialism is an economic system whereby the wealth created by the whole of society is redistributed evenly amongst the populace, ensuring that all are equally rewarded for the work everyone does.\n\nCommunism is a political contruct by which socialism is the main economic form.  In a communist society, a single political party controls the government, there are no real elections, and the populace is kept complacent by a bloated government machine that provides for all of the people.  Socialism is the dominant economic form to ensure the people are deluded into theinking they are taken care of.  \n\nExamples of socialist societies - France, Sweden, England\n\nExamples of Communist societies - Former USSR, China, Cuba
259898
Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that these countries have to take joint decisions on many matters. So they have developed common policies in a very wide range of fields - from agriculture to culture, from consumer affairs to competition, from the environment and energy to transport and trade.It took some time for the Member States to remove all the barriers to trade between them and to turn their 'common market' into a genuine single market in which goods, services, people and capital could move around freely.(europa.eu.int) as u can see with that policy EU maintain the common market and free economy which is the basic source of European economy and havin initial importance. Also they aim to create a collctive movement to ensure the stability(also u can think it as domination) in world politics. and these aims can only be sustainable with bringing new member states...u can directly look at EU documents...
513950
Non-Political. No politics truly benefit the people.
383695
1. It slows things down and makes enacting laws innefficient.\n\n2. It tracks and records events related to laws being enacted.\n\n3. All bureaucracies grow. Never in history have they ever gotten smaller.\n\n4. They employ mostly low performing life-long staff that work at efficiency rates that are typically 2x - 10x less than private enterprise.
577938
An economic system or economy consists of a set of rules, goals, and incentives that govern economic relations among people in a society and provide a way to answer the basic economic questions.\nEconomic systems may rely heavily on:\nTradition\nBrute Force\nFirst come -- First Serve\nCentral Authorities\nMarkets\n\nTypes of Economies\nTraditional:\nold or primitive ways to respond to the economizing problem\nPlanned or command:\nThe Central Authorities decide what to produce.\nMarket system or capitalism:\nMarket prices guide production decisions.\nMixed System:\nCertain segments of the economy are dominated by the Government.\nPanama is like the majority of the world nations.it applies mixed economy.
143485
Because, often, the people need it. Is there a government called "centralization". No offense, but it is called a unitary gov't.
774313
Have the government provide goods and services that benefit the community that cannot be efficiently/effectively be provided for by the private sector.\n\nExamples:\nnational defense--who wants to have a private army?\nrule of law--enforce contracts, provide rules for orderly economic exchange\ninfrastructure--roads, bridges, dams\n\nand many more!\n\nThe important distinction in my mind is that the public policy implementation must be less expensive than an equivalent service provided for by the private sector.\n\nPeople disagree on how to evaluate public goods and the relative capabilities of government and the private sector.\n\nAnother problem is the statesman/politician distinction.  A statesman will try to influence public policy to do what he/she believes is best for the community.  A  politician merely seeks to gain and exercise power through partisanship and the trading of favors, which inevitably hurts the community.
453152
this url gives a synopsis of a political economy analysis - which should help you get an idea of what is required when writing a typical one\n\nhttp://www.cepr.org/pubs/new-dps/dplist.asp?dpno=1225
455199
Your question doesn't make any sense. Your words don't even go together in the sentence. Have someone help you rewrite it.\n\nI knew what you were asking,it was just poorly written.\nAnswer:\nThey only way to " balance" a national income is for a government to take the higher earned income from one group and give it to another. That will never work.\n\nMost people confuse a countries economics system with their system of government. That is like comparing apples to oranges.\n\nThere are basically three economic systems: Capitalism, Socialism and Communism.  \nMany of the European countries use a socialist type system and it works great but it relies on high taxes and less poor people. "More people pushing the bus then riding it" and you can be wealthy under that systems.\n\nMany countries claim that term but actually are communist/ capitalist economic society. There is no country that is a true communist system. It is more of a dream then a reality . It is based on a system of need.\nBut, also there is no true capitalist system either. The US is a quasi capitalist/socialist system. \nWe have in theory a capitalist free market, supply and demand system but in reality we don't. No country can with our mass immigration policy of unlimited labor pool. \nThe only thing this type of economic policy will do is guarantee that wages will never go up only down. The only ones that benefit from this policy are the wealth. Think about it.
1012866
Money.\nCorruption and how to get away with it.\nLobbyist and how to appease them\nCorporations interest in the country\nSelf-defense ( who are we kidding)
593058
Govt. deals with the economy by means of levying taxes, restrictions, quotas, duties etc.\nLike for restricting monopolies by increasing capital base in the organization, govt. has Monopolies Restricted Trade Pratices Act.\nFor barring imports and exports in bulk quantities, govt. has Quotas fixed.\nThen you have all kinda taxes like Income, Service, VAT etc.\nThen you have duties like Import, Excise etc.\nRegards\nt$k\nhttp://tsk911.hi5.com
916604
Communism, capitalism, and socialism are primarily economic systems.  There are a variety of political philosophies and systems that interface with any of these.  Added to that is the fact that many nations have economic and political systems that blend aspects of these various systems.\n\nKim Jong Il might use the mantle of communism, but North Korea is far from being a communist or socialist state.  Most of its population lives in poverty.  Famine is a constant threat for them.  There is no equal distribution of goods.  Kim Jong Il is a dictator, as was Stalin.  Their regimes were about centralized power and nothing about socialism or communism.
329585
To protect the people who are already here.Also to hopefully bring in positive additions to our society.I think the most Important thing is to create a balance,this is crucial to a healthy economy.
946787
Governments are formed by people in order to accomplish common goals which would be unattainable by individuals or businesses.  In our tiered system each tier is best suited to accomplish certain goals.  \n\nGovernments should only take it upon themselves to provide services that 1) the community wants/needs and 2) cannot be accomplished be individuals or businesses.  \n\nOnce a "common goal" meets the above criteria then it should be assigned to the appropriate tier (Federal, State, County or City) of government which is best suited to accomplish that goal.  Not every problem requires an act of Congress.  For example, some communities have passed ordinances against parking cars in the front lawn of a home; it is not necessary for congress to pass legislation forcing the entire country to abide by this.  In the inverse the Federal Government is obviously best suited to provide National Security; if it were left up to the states we would have to deal with the chaos of 50 separate armies.
800427
Welcome to the world of political philosophy vs political propoganda.  Okay a couple of things socialism means that the government has more control over business.  MAking sure there is money for healthcare, welfare, education, etc.  There are many socailistic countries in Europe that are democratic and doing fine.  Communism is further left.  Communism is an economic model and not a political one.  You could have a democratic communism.  What has happenned is a lot of solcialistic dictatorships.  There is yet to be a true communist country.  Unfortunately human greed always ruins communism as it will do with capitalism (according to marx) and there is examples of it starting to happen now (outsourcing jobs for penny wages).  Captilism will expand until it cannot expand any further and then collapse upon itself (basically once the rich have starved the poor whats left?).  It is a very confusing issue.   Anarchy is a political model and I would say is the opposite of socialism...which is no governemnt at all.  However I have been an anarchist for awhile, not because of punk, but because I have no faith in the politcal process today.  Too much business influence and lobbyists to really help most individuals.  But the pistols do rock.