give 2 differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes?
92432
The prokaryote cell does not contain a nucleus. Prokaryote cells are only one celled organisms.\nEukaryote cells can be of one celled organisms, or multi-celled (like you and me). Eukaryote cells contain mitocondria, I don't beleave prokaryotes do.
34029
The most significant difference is that Yeasts are Eukaryotic cells and Bacteria are Prokaryotic cells. \n\nWhat this basically means is that Yeasts have their DNA contained within a nucleus. Bacteria lack a nucleus and their DNA is more or less "loose" within their cytoplasm (although they do possess some measures to compact it so that it takes up less space.)
427095
prokaryotes have 70S ribosomes, each consisting of a (small) 30S and a (large) 50S subunit, whereas eukaryotes have 80S ribosomes, each consisting of a (small) 40S and a bound (large) 60S subunit. However, the ribosomes found in chloroplasts and mitochondria of eukaryotes are 70S, this being but one of the observations supporting the endosymbiotic theory.\nwhat do you mean by inclusive? Subspecies ?
80564
Procaryotes and eucaryotes are types of microorganisms which are classified based on their membranes.  The main difference between procaryotic and eucaryotic microorganism is that the latter has nucleus and membrane-bound organelles while the former does not.  Furthermore, procaryotes are mostly unicellular while eucaryotes are multicellular.
159999
I'm not certain if this is what you mean, but prokaryotic  organisms (i.e. bacteria) have plasmids more often than do eukaryotic organisms. Not all bacterial chromosomes are plasmids, and not all plasmids are bacterial chromosomes.
496545
your question is a little woolen, if you are speaking of  the initiation of protein synthesis, then there different initiation factors. However if you are talking about different proteins being translated, then no the inititation factors are the same for different proteins, its just a mechanism.\n\nAlso there are different inititation factors in prokaryotes and eukaryotes..\n\nBe a little more specific and i will be more than happy to look it up for you.
935984
For eukaryotes, in the neucleus. For prokaryotes, the cytoplasm because they don't have a nucleus.
901079
Both Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic cells might contain Ribosomes.\n\nThe organelles that Eukaryotic cells have that Prokaryotic cells do not have include a true nucleus (bound by a double membrane) and usually mitochondria.  Also in some plants, chloroplasts.
1012471
(A) protozoa\n(B) protozoa are eukaryotes (have membrane bound organelles), bacteria are prokaryotes (no nucleus, organelles, etc)\n(C) there are thousands of protozoans in Kingdom Protista (maybe even millions)\n(D) Protozoans are animal like because they are motile (some have flagella and/or cillia), SOME of them cannot produce their own food (via photosynthesis), so they have to get food from their environment, and some are sexually reproducing organisms.\n(E) via sexual reproduction\n\n(F) next time pay attention in class :)
285214
In the nucleus, except in preparation for cell division.  Eukaryotes are defined by the presence of a nucleus, with "eukaryote" being greek for "True Nut."  A prokaryotic cell lacks a nucleus.\n\nDNA remains in the nucleus, and RNAs act as messenger molecules to transfer information out for protein synthesis.
486941
The origin of the eukaryotic cell was a milestone in the evolution of life, since they include all complex cells and multi-cellular organisms. The timing of this series of events is hard to determine; Knoll (1992) suggests they developed approximately 1.6 - 2.1 billion years ago. Fossils that are clearly related to modern groups start appearing around 800 million years ago.\n\nrRNA trees constructed during the 1980s and 1990s left most eukaryotes in an unresolved "crown" group (not technically a true crown), which was usually divided by the form of the mitochondrial cristae. The few groups that lack mitochondria branched separately and so the absence was believed to be primitive, but this is now considered an artifact of long branch attraction and they are known to have lost them secondarily.\n\nTrees based on actin and other genes have painted a different and more complete picture. Most eukaryotes are now included in several supergroups:\n\nOpisthokonts Animals, fungi, choanoflagellates, etc. \nAmoebozoa Most lobose amoebae and slime moulds \nRhizaria Various amoeboid protozoa \nExcavates Various flagellate protozoa \nArchaeplastida Land plants, green and red algae \nHeterokonts Brown algae, diatoms, water molds, etc. \nAlveolates Ciliates, Apicomplexa, dinoflagellates, etc. \n\nThe heterokonts and alveolates may be part of a larger group that is ancestrally photosynthetic, called the chromalveolates, but this remains contentious. Otherwise the relationships between the different supergroups are mostly uncertain, and in particular there is dispute about where the root of the evolutionary tree belongs, and as a result what the earliest eukaryotes were like. A few small protist groups have not been related to any of the major supergroups, notably the centrohelids, apusozoans, and ebriids.\n\nEukaryotes are closely related to archaea, at least in terms of nuclear DNA and genetic machinery. In other respects, such as membrane composition, they are similar to eubacteria. Three main explanations for this have been proposed:\n\nEukaryotes resulted from the complete fusion of two or more cells, the cytoplasm forming from a eubacterium and the nucleus from an archaeon (alternatively a virus). \nEukaryotes developed from Archaea, and acquired their eubacterial characteristics from the proto-mitochondrion. \nEukaryotes and Archaea developed separately from a modified eubacterium. \nThe origin of the endomembrane system and mitochondria are also disputed. The phagotrophic hypothesis states the membranes originated with the development of endocytosis and later specialized; mitochondria were acquired by ingestion, like plastids. The syntrophic hypothesis states that the proto-eukaryote relied on the proto-mitochondrion for food, and so ultimately grew to surround it; the membranes originate later, in part thanks to mitochondrial genes (the hydrogen hypothesis is one particular version).
514473
Theory? I mean, I can think of the endosymbiotic theory, but that's eukaryotes. Perhaps you mean the organelle that carries out photosynthesis in prokaryotes?
841584
Just to add to Acraz's answer, Plants and fungi are also made up of eukaryotic cells. \nOnly bacteria are prokaryotic.
821161
Nuclear?  Nuclear envelope?  Nuclear membrane? \n\nThe word 'eukaryote' means 'true nuclei'.  They are talking about the membrane which surrounds the nucleus of the cell.  This is not present in Prokaryotes.
137015
eukarotic bacteria are unicellular; fungi can be multicellular whereas bacteria can not. Bacteria move themselves by means of a flagella unlike fungi which don't. Bacteria lack a nucleous and mitochondria unlike fungi. Many bacteria have differing cell walls from fungi. I believe the term used is peptidoglcoans, which describes the cell wall.
131498
Eukaryotes contain membrane-bound nuclei and other organelles, while prokaryotes lack this membrane-bound nucleus. Prokaryotes are classified in two kingdoms separate from the eukaryotes. Eukaryotes are the type of cells that make up plants and one celled organisms, but not animals.\n\nBut there is a longer discription on:\nhttp://ks.essortment.com/prokaryoteseuka_rgbo.htm
100440
By structure or by type. Do you mean Blood cell types? If so then they are classified by type. Such as: Erythrocytes, \nPlatelets, Leukocytes...  There are two types of cells, eukaryotic and prokaryotic. Eukaryotic cells are usally found in multi-cellular organisms, while prokaryotic cells are usually on their own. Or do you mean classifying specific cells such as cancer cell types? Or did you mean prison cell types? The question is to broad. The basic cell types are the two stated above. Hope that helps.