what was the county of sacramento, et al. lewis 1968 rulings?
91469
It was actually a 1998 case U.S. Supreme Court case.  The case involved a wrongful death lawsuit arising from a high speed police chase.  The issue in this case is whether a police officer violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of substantive due process by causing death through deliberate or reckless indifference to life in a high-speed automobile chase aimed at apprehending a suspected offender. The Supreme Court said no and ruled in favor of the officers.
231676
What state?  What ruling?
165722
Too bad the law student didn't give the correct answer.  The only way the case information is going to be online is if the case was appealed and the Court of Appeal published its decision.  To review records of the trial court proceedings, you will need to actually go to the court house and manually review the file.\n\nIf you are referring to Dupage County in Illinois, I found that court's website and the link below tells you how to access public record of court files.
1166254
try looking on the california web site.
1045450
William H. Warner a topographical engineer laid out  the city plan for what was to become Sacramento in the year 1848. He was hired by John F. Sutter Jr. The city got a charter the next year, 1848. The Sutter father & son did not get along and the son set up the city. Sutter Sr. later became bankrupt. Sutter senior was the owner of Sutter's mill the first strike in the California gold rush.\nWilliam H. Warner was a 2'nd. lieutenant in the U.s Corps. of Topographical Engineers. He was killed July 1, 1850.\nWm T. Sherman was and lived in Ca. several times, (as early as 1847), but was not involved in the laying out of the streets of Sacramento.\nDan the Answers-Man\nAppreciate extra points & never refuse them.
576248
try going to www.lasuperiorcourt.org and click on traffic or traffic tickets.  you can also try typing the traffic code violations number in any search engine.  i'm sure they'll come up.  that's what I did.
598069
http://www.peoples-law.org/housing/ltenant/legal%20info/Bal%20county%20special%20rules%202.html\n\nthat link has alot of Information maybe what you want is there. I hope I helped.
225262
Court records are a matter of public record, but in order to look at most court filings, you may need to visit the court clerk's office. You could try looking at the court's website for information about court filings. Clark County District Court has info available on Blackstone, http://courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us/, but I didn't see the party name you are looking for there. Washoe also has a similar website, though I am much less familiar with that end of the state, www.ccwashoe.com. The Nevada Supreme Court posts advance opinions online for ninety days at http://www.leg.state.nv.us/scd/OpinionListPage.cfm, but I didn't see that party name there either. It would help to know which court or at least the city or county, any dates, first name, any other known info.
934410
Here's a website.  You could print it out.\n\nhttp://ccr.oal.ca.gov/linkedslice/default.asp?SP=CCR-1000&Action=Welcome
181182
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the lower court's ruling:\n\n"In 1973, petitioners in No. 85-1626 (hereinafter petitioners), including individual employees of Lukens Steel Co. (Lukens), brought suit in Federal District Court against Lukens and the employees' collective-bargaining agents (Unions), asserting racial discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981. The court held that Pennsylvania's 6-year statute of limitations governing contract claims applied to 1981 claims, that Lukens had discriminated in certain respects, and that the Unions were also guilty of discriminatory practices in failing to challenge Lukens' discriminatory discharges of probationary employees, in failing and refusing to assert instances of racial discrimination as grievances, and in tolerating and tacitly encouraging racial harassment. The court entered injunctive orders against Lukens and the Unions, reserving damages issues for further proceedings. The Court of Appeals held that Pennsylvania's 2-year statute of limitations governing personal injury actions, rather than the 6-year statute, controlled the 1981 claims, but affirmed the liability judgment against the Unions."
48484
It used to be Marin County.
810927
Are you talking about DeRolph vs. State of Ohio? Try the link below, which gives a chronology of the case. Or try searching on "DeRolph vs. State of Ohio" for other links that may give you the information you need. Good luck!
158446
No. (and yes)   Common law marriage was abolished in California sometime around 1927.\n\n However, if people get married outside of California according to the laws where they are, and those laws include "common law" marriage, then that marriage (including a "common law" one), will be recognized in California should they move there.\n  \nAdditionally, when justice will be done, California courts will grant "putative spouse" status to a person, who in good faith, thought he or she was married, but the formalities were not done.  In a case I represented the "wife", she was a new immigrant from Vietnam (where marriages are not a governmental affair) and went through a Buddist wedding ceremony with her husband. Husband did not have them obtain a wedding license and somehow had the priest conducting the ceremony overlook that no license had been presented to him to sign.  Husband was killed in an auto accident and to prosecute the wrongful death case, I had to prove that she was a "putative spouse" who, under California law, can sue for the death of her husband.\n\nAlso, recently, California has institued "domestic partnerships" for persons unable to marry each other, which give the parties many of the rights spouses have, including rights to custody/visitation of children, child and partner support, and equal division of assets (and debts) acquired during the partnership.\n\nIf you really need them, I could look up the exact statutes.
77750
Not very many newspapers, the Sacto Bee included, have converted their old articles to searchable databases. I believe you can still go down to the Bee's offices (assuming you are in Sacramento, or nearby) and search their microfilm records. The Sacramento Public Library might also be a good source.
195382
lexisnexis or westlaw should work, but its $$$. the other option to research is your local law school library. The librarians are generally pretty good.\n\nAs far as I can tell there are no california state cases published by that name. (only cases that go to the state supreme court, and some at the intermediate appeals level are published) There may be federal cases, but I didn't want to take the time.\n\ngood luck
181146
The decision was based on the 14th amendment.  The case was Afroyim vs. Rusk and details can be found at:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afroyim_v._Rusk
894823
This can't be answered without more information. What kind of judgment, what state, when and under what circumstances was the judgment issued.