what are the benefits of an absolute monarchy?
93568
no checks and balances. if the king wants to get something done he just orders it. Does not have to worry about Congress passing laws or the Court saying certain things are unconstituional. What the king says goes.
921241
advantage: it is wonderful country, having nice and cultrual history\n. u will get full fredom, parantes love their child "only happan in india"\ndisadv. : it is politicaly ill.
548765
The previous answer is correct. For more information, visit www.royal.gov.uk. This is the official website of the British Monarchy and has a wealth of information.
601043
Go to http://www.cherokeenation.org\nRegister in the upper left hand corner.\nThen you can search the benefits available to you.
905760
In Britain Government and the parliament have the power Monarchy is just in name only to sign as per the advise of Government and Parliament.
107189
economic benefits (subsidies paid by existing EU member states to new entrants), free trade within the the EU and ease of travel for its citizens throughout EU and world
1056968
Yes , monarchy should go the way of slavery, outside toilets and smallpox. Let's make monarchy history.
770406
In a book a few years ago I read how the Sovereign, early in the Reign, "voluntarily" turns over to Parliament a huge sum of income per year and, in return receives a stipulated "Civil List" payments for Sovereign and a few other members of the Royal Family (most of whom accept many engagements etc. -- visits, openings, etc., etc.).   I don't remember specific numbers but do seem to remember that actually the Family relinquishes more than they receive.\n=====================\nWhen The Queen acceded to the throne in 1952, she agreed, as every monarch before her from the time of George III, that all revenues from the Crown Estate would be handed over to the Government in return for an annual payment from Parliament to meet the official costs of the monarchy. \n\nYou have already documented the profit made by the Crown Estate. For the same period, Head of State expenditure was £35.3 million. This figure represents the official cost to Government of running the monarchy. It includes the Civil List, (which meets the costs of The Queen's official Household), Grants-in-Aid (which cover property upkeep, communications and travel) and expenditure met directly from Governmental Departments (such as the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office), but excludes security (a matter for the Home Office and the Police).\n\nIt is not a form of payment for The Queen. It is used to meet the official costs of her household, working for The Queen as Head of State. Parliamentary Annuities are paid to other members of the Royal Family in recognition of their official duties. Since 1993, however, The Queen has repaid all of these parliamentary annuities to the Treasury, except the annuity paid to The Duke of Edinburgh. The Queen therefore meets all the official costs of all other members of the Royal Family (The Duke of York, The Earl and Countess of Wessex, The Princess Royal, The Dukes and Duchesses of Kent and Gloucester and Princess Alexandra) who carry out official duties. The Prince of Wales derives his income from the Duchy of Cornwall.\n\nIt is not true to say that there is an official line from the Palace which states that the Monarchy gives more to the government than it receives. The official costs of the British monarchy are very open and publicly documented. Annual reports for the Civil List and the Grants-in-aid are laid before Parliament, and they can be viewed in great detail on the Royal web site. Details of profits made by the Crown Estate can be viewed on the Crown Estate web site.
1095667
The native Australians think the same thing. The monarchy is a tradition, and a very expensive one at that. I would like to know why that tradition is upheld because they have no power. they are basically useless.
486732
Absolute monarchies:\n\nBhutan \nBrunei Darussalam \nOman \nQatar \nSaudi Arabia \nSwaziland \nTonga \nUnited Arab Emirates \n\nSome other exist, which are also influenced strongly by monarchs: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy\n\n\nLed by Communist parties:\n\nPeople's Republic of China  \nCuba  \nVietnam\n\nBut not only Communist countries are one-party countries...
390407
Constitutional Monarchy
1181339
Also known as IT has many advantages. Most mentioned by the two previous answers. Good Luck on your recitation.
176853
.....form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty.....
635061
"Deference" is a visible show of respect for someone or something.  "Difference" is the quality of something being different from some other thing.  In a tyranny, someone, or small group of someones, make decisions for the whole.  In a monarchy, the royal person is the "owner" of the place and gets to make the decisions--unless it's a "Constitutional Monarchy", where the monarch is limited by law in certain areas.  In a democratic republic, like the U. S. A., the country belongs to the ordinary citizens.  The governing bodies are simply the "hired hands" of the owners--put in place to do necessary work while the owners go about their own lives.  Those governing bodies should make laws which protect the people they work for, as well as make honest business easy to conduct.  "Freedom" means a person has the capacity to choose how he/she wants to live, what work he/she wants to do, whose lead to follow in various facets of life, etc.  Democracy is a system which lets people choose--who should be in their governing bodies, what theory of government seems best--"democracy" (in the ideal) supports "freedom".
93188
This should help you out, lots of information, on this website.. http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince00.htm
585023
1. free education from kindergarden to university\n2. free high quality health care
1136428
Monarchs exist to represent their country without the burden of having to court public opinion in order to get themselves re-elected. They embody inherent cultural values: not a responsibility that most of us would be able to live up to. All societies are based upon hierarchies. Money and democracy seem to be implicitly justified as premises for power. Modern monarchs do not attempt to justify their status. This is why they are not hypocrites like politicians. (Yes I do support my Queen.)