how much would i weigh on jupiter if i weighed 85 pounds on earth?
86906
Check this site out,\nhttp://www.onlineconversion.com/weight_on_other_planets.htm\nand/or this one,\nhttp://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/W/weight.html
608880
And I see that you are no exception, as you HAVE confused them!!\n\nIn the S.I. system, mass is kg, and weight is N (that is Newtons)\n\nIn the Imperial system, mass is slugs and weight is pounds.\n\n1 slug is equal to 14.6 kg.\n1 lb. is qual to 4.5 N\n\nPeople generally confuse them because the authorities decided  to equate 1 kg to 2.2 lb.  Not that it makes that much of a difference if these are used for commercial and not technical/scientific purposes, since gravity is basically the same at all habitable places on Earth.
57354
you have to divide 127 by 2.2. so 127 lbs would be 57.73 kilos
893739
For our height the weight would be anywhere between 115 and 135.  135 being the absolute max. It all depends on you bone structure. For me I have sort of a medium build so I have to stay between 125 and 130, or else I look VERY sick. If you are built is small stay within 115 and 125. Good luck. Oh here this website helps.  \n http://diet.ivillage.com/
1116820
No, because conservation of momentum means the earth is a closed system. Plus, the earth weighs 5.972 sextillion metric tons (5,972 followed by 18 zeros)\n\nThe total earth population is currently 6,522,008,632. So assuming the whole world's population stood on one side ot the world and they were all typical Americans and weighed an averaged140kg each, the total human weight would come to 913081208480kg or approx 913,081,208 metric tons or roughly a giga ton (I forgot to include some of the larger than average Americans in my averages anyway) so the earth weighs approximately 5.972*10^9 times as much. Basically, you got more chance of propelling yourself to Mars by squeezing a zit on your face (even if your a really spotty teenager) than us all jumping and knocking the earth off orbit. \n\nHowever, if you got all those yanks to throw down a days worth of Big Macs at once, you might actually do it.\n\nDoesn't this make you feel really puny and immaterial to the world? Just be grateful you don't live on a gas giant.
89108
32.675 AU for jupiter's circumference, and 2.406 AU for mercury.  Jupiter is the largest planet in our solar system.
271776
Earth's Weight (Mass): 5.972 sextillion (1,000 trillion) metric tons. That's 5,972,000,000,000,000,000,000 tons! Actually, scientists prefer to refer to this measurement as the Earth's mass instead of weight since weight is the result of Earth's gravitational pull on another object. And the Earth cannot pull on itself! As the Earth orbits the Sun, it is weightless. If the Earth were placed on the Sun, it would weigh more than if it were placed on Jupiter, the largest planet in the solar system but much smaller than the sun. Yet, Earth (or any other object for that matter) would have the same mass regardless of where it is located. \n\nNew measurements of the weight of planet Earth have taken physicists a step closer to their holy grail: a precise value for the Newtonian gravitational constant.\n\nJens Gundlach and Stephen Merkowitz from the University of Washington have found that the Earth\nweighs in at 5.972 sextillion (5,972,000,000,000,000,000,000) metric tons. While this is just a shade under the current textbook estimate of 5.98 sextillion metric tons, it could make all the difference to nailing down the gravitational constant, or Big G.\n\nThe researchers presented their findings this week at a meeting of the American Physical Society in Long Beach, California, and will publish after peer review.\n\nThe weight for Earth calculated by the Washington physicists is about 1 trillion metric tons for each person living on the planet, about the weight of the entire amount of plant and animal life living on the Earth's surface.\n\nDebate over the gravitational constant has been raging for 13 years. New attempts to measure the Big G in the 1990's brought results widely different from the previously accepted figure. Indeed, the National Institute of Standards committee that establishes the accepted value noted that there was 12 times more uncertainty about the figure in 1999 than in 1987.\n\n"Gravity is the most important large-scale interaction in the universe, there's no doubt about it," Gundlach said. "It is largely responsible for the fate of the universe. Yet it is relatively little understood."\n\nNewton's gravitational constant tells how much gravitational force there is between two masses -- the Earth and sun, for instance -- separated by a known distance.\n\nThe gravitational constant along with the speed of light and Planck's constant (a key value in quantum mechanics) are considered the three most fundamental and universal constants in nature.\n\n"That is a huge embarrassment for modern physics, where we think we know everything so well and other constants are defined to many, many digits," Gundlach said.\n\nIf accepted, the measurement by Gundlach and Merkowitz would reduce the uncertainty by nearly a factor of 100 from the currently accepted figure, making it far more precise than even the 1987 figure. Gundlach notes his numbers could change as additional data are analysed in preparation for submitting the work for peer review.\n\nTo make their measurements, the researchers are using a device called a torsion balance that records nearly imperceptible accelerations from the gravitational effects of four 8.14-kilogram stainless steel balls on a 3- by 1.5-inch gold-coated Pyrex plate just 1.5 millimeters thick.\n\nThe device, operating inside an old cyclotron hall in the UW nuclear physics laboratory, is similar in nature to one used 200 years ago to make the first Big G measurement. But it is computer controlled and contains numerous mechanical refinements that make the more precise measurement possible.\n\nGundlach acknowledged that the more precise calculation probably wouldn't mean much to the average person.\n\n"Just because we know the value of G won't make better cell phones," he said. "But it's something mankind should know because it's such a fundamental constant."
627250
All the solar system models you can buy are not to scale, which is OK if all you want to do is show the planets in the right order. But I much prefer a scale model. Only trouble is, it is WAY to big to make indoors. Jupiter is 10 times bigger than Earth and the Sun is 10 times bigger than Jupiter, so if Earth is a 1 inch ball, you need a 10 inch ball to be Jupiter (a basketball is 10 inches) and a 100 inch ball (8 feet 4 inch) for the Sun. Maybe a weather balloon would do. What I did instead was say that the basketball was the Sun, a one inch ball was Jupiter and a 1/10 inch pinhead was Earth. The other planet sizes can be calculated with the first link in the sources below. If the Sun is 10 inches, then Mercury is 34 feet away, Earth is 89 feet away and Pluto is about 2/3 of a mile away. What I did was take the class for a walk outside. We walked 2/3 of a mile from the school, setting up planets as we went. Or you could just set them in a row on the table and have the correct distances written on an information sheet. The whole point is that the planets are really small and really far apart. The models where the sun is only twice as big as Earth just are not convincing.
183061
1/6 of earths weight, 400/6 =66.67 lbs
926787
Mass is a constant.  \n\nWeight depends on gravity.\n\nSo, your mass is the same on earth and on the moon,\nbut you would weigh one-sixth as much on the moon\nas you do here on earth.
665122
mass of Earth = 5.9742 × 1024 kilograms
547339
i think this is a more practical way of appreciating it: compare gravitation on uranus and the earth using your body weight: go to the link below, type in your weight, then voila! - you get your weight on uranus!\n\nif you just want the numbers and plain facts (i.e., weight = mass x gravity, so you might want to check out mass and gravity, etc.), browse the facts and figures part of the site.
757322
all you have to do is multiply the kg by 10 ( or the 9.81 which is the gravity constant)\n\nso you would have about 855 N
52820
The gravitational pull on the moon is 1/6 that on Earth.  Note that on the Moon only your Weight (Pulling force of planet,etc) changes and not your Mass (Measure of amount of matter in an object).  So if your Mass is 100lb (approx 45kg) on Earth, it would still be 100lb on the Moon.  \nHowever your Weight changes from being 450N (450 newtons using the equation Weight = Mass x gravitational field strength on earth which is taken as 10N/kg) on Earth to 75.2N on the moon (1/6 that on Earth where g = 1.67N/kg)
999627
depends on your weight
748818
Your density will be similar to whatever material makes up the planet.  For instance, Mars is mostly rock, with some iron ore.  I'd guess the density is on the order of 2.5 g/cm3.  Jupiter is made up of mostly dense gases.  I'd guess given the temp, that the density is slightly higher than that of water, like 1.3 g/cm3.\n\nVolume on the other hand.......are you kidding?  You seriously want it in cm3????  You'll run out of room on your paper writing zeros.
1043150
Your body still has the same mass so your weight would not change.  However, there is a difference due to gravity.  The Ground Reaction Force (based on Newton's Third Law of Motion) would change due to the surface area to which gravity is applied.  This is the basic principle why astronaut's weigh less on the moon than on Earth because of the amount of gravity.  So yes, if you slouch you would weigh more because of gravity but it would be such a small amount of difference that it wouldn't be measurable on a standard scale.