Whether the shroud or turin genuine or not?
85703
If it is genuine, I think it will be impossible to demonstrate it.  \nIf it is not genuine it will possible to demonstrate it.\n\nSo we will only be sure after they say that is not genuine.
15143
I'm not sure. I believe it is real though. Wish I had some solid proof to back it up. Perhaps we wont know for sure untill civilians are able to land freely on the moon and see for themselves. Until that happens fully, we just have to rely on faith.
542792
There is only one Christ Jesus.  \n\nWhen He comes again, and if you are still alive, you will recognise it.  You will know and you don't even need to doubt.  Because it is going to be so awesome.\n\nHis awesome return is the difference between the real and the fake.  A phenomenon men never experienced.\n@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
409654
Regardless of what has been found. You are always going to find someone trying to portray Christianity as fake or not real. Or in that fact people claiming that Christ is not the Savior for man kind. The only way to find out is see for your self. Open up the bible and read scripture. Or find someone to help you study the bible. The truth is there it is just up to you to search it out.\n\nGod Bless
609499
Simple Answer:\n\nActually a study was done on this and as it turns out the first portrait of Jesus was considered to have come from the shroud of Turin (The famout burial shroud of Christ supposedly bearing His image). Immediately all portraits and paintings mimicked the likeness on the shroud. Later on European Catholics dominated in power and portraits began resembling them because they believed that they were the "true" Christians so surely Jesus looked more like them than anyone else.\n\nJesus most likely looked like an Israeli Jew, but because most Christians are not Jewish Jesus' image began to descend farther and farther away from the Jewish likeness and more towards the predominant denomination, European Christians.\n\nHope thish helps.
818087
I believe that there is a lot of compelling evidence for the theory behind the Da Vinci (everyone should notice that that's what you asked about, not the novel itself)\n\nThe Priory of Sion part is highly questionable, but the evidence for the bloodline of Christ is very plausible and at least as "provable" is the orthodox Christian account.
283366
I'm not sure which I find more hliarious, that Patzy calls your article, "bullshit facts" yet there isn't a damn thing to prove God exists that isn't strung together inconsitencies and things that are unexplainable, or the fact that MommaToldMeNotToCome has no ability to read the article and see when the article you posted in fact written.  Fact is, no one should be calling anyone elses beliefs bullshit.  \n\nAs for your question, it could be.  There is no way to tell.  Lots of people were crucified at that time and what happened to Jesus wasn't special.  He was one of many.  \n\nAnd Susenjungle, the Shroud of Turin wasn't used by mary Magdelen to wipe Jesus face, it was what was laid over his body after the crucifiction and due to the oils the body secretes during the ordeal made an stain of his face and body on it.  I have some good books on the subject if you are interested, let me know!  I love sharing books!
799382
Legitimacy of what?  Your question is incomplete.\n\nSue
28157
No. The whole thing is a myth. Not even an original one. they just copied off of earlier civilizations myths.
464576
No, we have historical proof that God and Jesus DO exist, we also have historical proof that Santa, Toothy and E Buny exist.
53763
not necessarily true...i have a real one and a fake one and they are identical...if you start seeing glue coming from the seams, its fake. if it starts falling apart soon, its fake.
197174
it hasnt been proven, but there are pictures out there, tho most of them are fake\n\ni personally believe that there probably once was one, but there really isnt much chance that it is still alive\n\nit was probably a decendent of some dinosaur thing\n\nso yea, id say it is, well, WAS real
912578
None of them.  They are as much true relics as the hundreds of thousands of pieces of the cross that were sold across Europe during the Middle Ages.\nIn any case I am not interested in relics. I prefer to have to do with the living Christ Himself.
89991
well, there is the Bible, some text in the Islam ,the  Qunram..History I would say. Even if you are an atheist deny the existence of Jesus is just too far :/
1064394
I would have to look at the source ,material myself to make this determination.\n\nTo me it seems plausible. I read the book, and I haven't seen the movie. It sure looks like a woman next to Jesus in the Last Supper painting.\n\nOpuis Dei is real. You can look them up.\n\nThere was a Nicean counsel, and at the counsel they wrote the Nicean creed which is still recited in Catholic Churches to this day. This is the counsel that the book says "elected" Jesus the savior.\n\nLike I said, I'd have to research the Nicean counsel and go deeper than what you can find on the Internet.
316769
:}\nG-d is real the exodus was not Abraham's but Israel with Moses
214624
Both are true. No proof required.\n\nNot many details as far as your question goes, sorry I couldn't be more specific.