What is the role of the judiciary with regard to vis-a-vis statutes?
79021
Your question is unclear, however, with the separation of powers the Judiciary has nothing directly to do with statutes as legislated by the Congress.  It is the Congresses job to ensure that they are Constitutional.\n\nOnce enacted and applied, an individual who feels harm from that statute has standing to take it before the court.  Through judicial review that single court case can, through judicial review, make it to the United States Supreme Court.  That court can indirectly then make a decision as to the “rightness” of that statute as adjudicated in that single case.
125652
The purpose of the trial judge is to see that the law is fllowed by the parties to the case, and to move the proceedings forward to a verdict.\n\nThe jury, in a jury trial, is responsible for determining guilt or innocence, by judging the facts of the case.
971724
Congress has the mandate in law to impeach officials.\nJustices of the Supreme Court serves until 65 years old.\nCongress has the power to amend and repel national laws.\nThere are at least 15 Supreme Court Justices in most countries.\nThe Legislature can veto the act of the President by 2/3 votes.\nThe Supreme Court has the power to review all laws & treaties.\nThe Judicial Bar Council approves the appointment of judges.\nThe President approves all treaties with other countries.
937829
Delegated legislation (sometimes referred to as secondary legislation or subordinate legislation) is law made by ministers under powers given to them by parliamentary acts (primary legislation) in order to implement and administer the requirements of the acts. \n\nIt has equal effect in the judiciary although ministers can be challenged in the courts on the grounds that specific pieces of delegated legislation are not properly based on powers given by acts. \n\nWith respects to the necessity of delegated legislation, it would be impossible for all law to be passed as primary legislation. The process is long and exhaustive.
28192
Amendment VI\n\nIn all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. \n\nIn my opinion, this prevents people from being held for months or years without a trial or hearing.  It also provides them an avenue to put on a defense with witnesses, and provides a lawyer for those who can't afford one.  It prevents some people from being wrongfully accused without an opportunity to defend themselves.
353900
Because the judiciary measures law against written standards, called the Constitution and Legal Precendent.\n\nExecutive and Legislative do not measure law. They propose it, and create it. The standard they do this against is political opinion, popular vote, social moods/trends and reactionary decisioning (sometimes).\n\nTherefore, the Judiciary is in place to balance the results of lawmaking against law-validating, to protect everyone from the unintended negative consequences of bad lawmaking.
221348
http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0774837.html\nthat's a really good website it gives you all the info you need on the Judicial, executive, and Legislative braches of the governement it has a great over view of all three of the branches\nyou should ace this assigment with this article!\nBest of Luck!\n~Allie!
820324
Affidevit in a court.
1133206
There are several sources of law, statutes being one source of law.  Given the limitations of the english language, courts are sometimes called upon to interpret various statutes.  There are rules of statutory construction which  courts utilize in doing so.  The general theory is that courts should construe statutes to be constitutional, if possible. Second, the courts try to determine the intent of the legislature in interpreting the statute.  Courts will look to other court decisions interpreting the same or similar statutes, legislative intent, amendments to a statute, and even dictionaries and other sources.
323933
Victim Impact Statements (hereinafter referred to as “VISs”) are statements read by, or on behalf of, crime victims at the sentencing phase of criminal trials. VISs have been occasionally constitutionally challenged in American courts. The challenges have typically been that VISs conflict with the Eighth Amendment’s “Proportionality Doctrine”, which holds that punishment must be proportional to the crime. The United States Supreme Court has considered three times in recent years whether the reading of a VIS at the sentencing phase of criminal proceedings is constitutional1. The present constitutional status of VISs is that the proportionality doctrine “does not erect a per se bar” to the admissibility of VISs at sentencing proceedings, but the Fourteenth Amendment may provide a door to relief2. This note examines the Eighth Amendment treatment of VISs by the Court, and the possibility of future Fourteenth Amendment due process challenges to the consideration of VISs during the penalty phase of criminal proceedings.
536815
It used to be called "Zealous Advocacy" in the ethical codes.\n\nThe basic idea is that the legal system is adversarial, and that truth is best found when opposing learned individuals vigorously advocate their respective sides of the argument.\n\nThe 6th Amendment also guarantees assistance of counsel, which has been interpreted as effective assistance. Since the prosecutor is likely to be vigorous in seeking conviction (given the nature of the adversarial system), the defense must be equally vigorous.
223876
Legislative branch passes the laws.  The executive branch enforces the laws.  Judiciary tries the cases and interprets the meaning of the laws.
1171797
All authority or power is with the people in a Sovereign State.The people exercise this power through the Legislature which make the laws, the Executive which implement the laws and the Judiciary i.e. the courts which ensure that the Executive or the Legislature do not get derailed from their tracks. Simple: isn't it?
208008
http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/SENSEN_104_XML.pdf\n\nor for a summary\n\nhttp://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdf/immbillsection.pdf
244415
The statutes are somewhat extensive, so it would be best for you to just read it for yourself. The relevant section is Article 7 at the site below.
267210
The Supreme Court reviews all acts,laws,and statutes,and case opinions both with the federal and state in the American legal system.If the Court feels that the situation is unconstitutional it has the power to void it out.The Courts decision is final and stands supreme.Read the Bill of Rights (the Constitution). There are only a few to read.If you don't have access to a book do a search on the internet.Good luck and happy hunting.You can download e-books to help you with other similar projects in this field.I use to hate learning about government but, now that I am older it is more interesting to learn.Especially now that I know that I can have a positive say in this world as to how it is run since ,government effects everybody sooner or later.We have to think about our future and making it better.I too am studying government except mine is with criminal justice and wanting to help teens.
270575
Judges typically are there to ensure that all rules of the court are followed – most importantly, the Rules of Evidence.  Judges can rule on whether certain evidences are admissible (to be presented to the jury), as well as ruling on any motions either side would make.  Judges would also answer any questions from the jurors when they are deliberating.  If a defendant chooses to have a “bench” trial, the judge also serves as the jury (fact finder) as well.  The judge would also give sentences to convicted defendants according to the rules.