Determine if these lie on the same line?
85068
Well since you have to plot this on a graph this might be hard to explain only using english - but I'll try.\nQ would be 2 places to the right (from (0,0)) and 3 places up on your graph.  R is 1 place to the left and 1 place down.  S lies 4 places to the left and 2 places up.  Once these are graphed you can see that there is no way they can lay on a single line - so no they don't.\nSlope = rise/run.  R is 3 places below S and 3 places to the right so your rise/run = 3/3 and your slope = -1 (it's negative 1 because the line is sloping doen and not up).  If you were doing the slope from R to Q the slope would be positive.\nI hope this helps, good luck.  Hooray for math!
886083
You need to tell more about what these squares look like
941588
Identify the slope of each line and compare the values.\nIf the slopes are the same then they are parallel.\nIf the slopes give a value of -1 when multiplied together, then they are perpendicular.\nIf the slopes differ from that about, then they are neither.\n\nBring the y value to a unit value of one.\n(1) Slope 6∙4 and 6∙4, so it's parallel.\n(2) Slope ½ and ? , second equation is unclear.\nThe slopes are probably 3/2 and -3/2, if so, then they are perpendicular.\n(3) Slope -1/3 and 1/3, so the lines are perpendicular.
247429
there has been alot of work on showing that at least a certain percent of zeros must lie on the line. I think we're up to around 90%. It is unclear to me as to whether or not a proof can be found in this way. My guess is no
834079
y=-1/3x + 6 is your line\ny=-1/3x+1 is a parallel line
307198
It is linear on intervals, on (- infinite, 0) and on (0, +infinite) but not on the whole R. \n\nTry plotting it, you get a reversed V, not a straight line.
152263
A is on the x-axis (horizontally), while B is on y-axis (vertically).
463511
Use the double angle identities.
1020574
cmon its not that hard\n\nunion - you would add up both lists into a new list testing to make sure theres no dupes\n\nintersection youre looking for what exists in both lists
1039351
well u might hav seen enough picts/diagrams showing such field lines.\n\ntry this experiment.\nplace a barmagnet under a cardboard/examboard etc. then throw some iron fillings on the board. U will c that a pattern exactly like the one shown in diagrams is obtained.\n\ni guess this little 'experimental' proof satisfies u.
38016
Let No of square is N\nPerimeter = 2xN + 2 \n\nAssumptions:\nThey are arranged in a row.\nThey are of same size.\nThey are of UNIT size.
877991
try to find out which one is not correct
846910
No. They do not share the same dimensions.\n\nYou can multiply them though.
108416
none if they are false
386337
For example, you have a square and a circle and you are trying to classify them.  The first question would say "Are the sides all straight?"  If you are looking at the square, you would say yes.  You would look at the two possible answers, yes and no, and see where it says to go.  Since the difference between a square and circle are clear, there probably wouldn't be another question, but supposing there was, it might say "Are there any right angles?"  Yes again.  Go to the yes answer and go where it says to go.  Repeat this until you classify everything
354533
1. True. \n2. True.\n3. True.\n4. False. A parallelogram has no symmetry at all.\n5. True.
167128
There's an infinite number of answers.\n\nIf you do it all out, they both equal the same line...\nI multiplied the second equation by a -4 and got 0=0.\n\nIf you just multiply it by a 4 you'd see that it's the same exact line.