Can police officers have the authority to arrest a person with non visual evidence.?
96560
depends on the state, but  for the most part, yes, for example, a confession is non-visual, and that is more than enough to get arrested.
752549
This is extremely unlikely unless you are in the bootlegger's house when they are there to arrest him.  Copyright infringement is not high on the list of priorities for police services, despite those dire FBI warnings on movies and such.
705820
u would have to ask the cops
254943
If they can arrest a person on private property, why would they not be able to radar a person on private property? Granted, if on private property they are likely focused on the matter in the area, perhaps a domestic dispute, but why would there be an expectation of privacy when you pass private property, upon which a police officer, is via a car? \n\nNow, if you mean the whole area, including the road, is private property, then I would assume no, as the presence of the police must be based on cause, which could be as simple as a neighbor calling in about suspicious noises. However, once on the property, the police's powers, while possibly limited if they are present because of a search warrant, still exist in terms of monitoring and apprehension. If a person is speeding on the property, unless that speeding, or other type of driving, is lawful on the property, the police would have reason to use a radar gun, or just to detain the person and possibly arrest him. At the very least, the matter is best understood by knowing what kind of driving may be performed on what kind of property.   \n\nIn either case, my strong suspicion is that they can in some cases.
285667
Contact your local law authorities.  If information regarding arrest warrants are open to public knowledge, then they'd most likely be able to tell you.  Also, if this person is a FRIEND, it would seem you should be able to feel "free" (no pun intended, really) to just ask THEM.  Perhaps, if you already have, maybe you're doubting their answer.  Be careful.  Don't get yourself caught up in the middle of any foolishness.  Take care.
1091880
This would ordinarily be referred to material evidence.  When the police want something, and they discover it, then they seize it as evidence of a suspected crime.
129432
Call your local police dept. they will be able to tell you.
723957
If someone breaks the law they can be arrested.  If they haven't broke the law a fake charge can always be made up to arrest them.\n\nCoach
1042055
Any search or seizure of an automobile must be "reasonable" under the 4th Amendment.  Reasonableness is determined by the particular circumstances of the situation.  With automobiles, a court will consider the totality of the circumstances that gave rise to the officer's decision to search your car.  There will never be a simple answer to this question.  If you are just speeding, then it is extremely unlikely that any evidence acquired from a non-consentual search of your vehicle may be used against you in court.  However, if you are acting nervous, sweating, stuttering, smell like alcohol, etc., then the determination of whether the search was reasonable under the circumstances will be made by the judge.  Also, the search must be reasonable prior to the officer's decision to conduct the search.  So, if he opens the trunk without your permission and finds a weapon, he cannot legally expand his search to other areas of the car.  He may try, but any evidence acquired will not be admissable against you in court (including evidence found in the trunk).  So, if you are stopped and an officer asks to search your vehicle, you have the right to refuse the search.  However, a drug sniffing dog may be used to smell for drugs (or bombs, etc.).  Further, an officer may look into the vehicle from the outside for any items which suggest illegal activity.  If a visual inspection or a drug dog reveals the possibility of illegal activity, the officer may have a reasonable basis for conducting a search despite your refusal.\n\nUltimately, you do not have to consent to any search of an automobile.  However, a police officer may search your vehicle despite your refusal.  If the search was legitimately based on reasonable suspicions of illegal activity, then anything produced from the search may be admitted against you as evidence in court.
189191
There are alot of laws that give a police officer the power to arrest you. Those laws are mainly there for peolple that get out of control. It is up to the officer to decide if ones actions warrant arrest depending on the situation and that persons attitude. I was lighting fireworks with my kids the day after 4th of july because their cousins missed my fireworks show the night of the 4th. The police showed up, wanted to know why I was lighting fireworks and asked me to stop. Fireworks (at leat the ones I was shooting off) was illegal. I could have been arrested without them asking me for a explanation and certainly been arrested had I not complied.
467802
He or she can probably get into more trouble by withholding evidence.  The words that come to mind are: accessory after the fact.  I believe that could apply here.
1015583
That appears to violate the constitution since it requires a person who has done nothing to provide self-incriminating evidence to the police. It lacks "probable cause," and would therefore be unconstitutional.
874050
First of all did they have a search warrant and if so how specific or broad was the scope of the search?  If they had a warrant and followed all of the particulars of the warrant then in all likelihood what they did was legal.  At the execution of the warrant they are not required to arrest anyone though most times they do.  It is not safe to say you are OK until the statute of limitations is up.  Until then you can be arrested for any number of charges based on the evidence they took.  You are unlikely to get any of the things back that they took but if you get anything it will be the lamp and the computer.  I would consult with a lawyer to find out what your rights are and aren't in this situation and the possible outcomes if they use the evidence they retrieved to arrest you.
484865
You have to tell them that you are performing a citizens arrest citing the reason and which CRIMINAL law has been broken. Then you have to inform them of their rights (same as Police), then hand over to police when they turn up. You can't search them, neither can you touch them (classed as assault).
411646
No, the police can't legally stop you "just because"...there must be at least be something known as reasonable suspicion.\n\nHowever, I have almost no idea what your question is because of the way you wrote it.  Any chance you can turn it into something that makes a little more sense?
1096856
You may refuse the search. Once you give consent to search, you can repeal it at any time and the Police Officer must stop. The only time in which you have no choice is called search incident to arrest.\n\nIf they do not stop and find something it is not admissible in court. It's called "fruit of the poisonous tree" I hope this helps.  Cop in Maine
735799
Ask your local police department they should know.