Who were princess diana's siblings? Sarah, ___________________and please include their ages.?
89056
Diana had two older sisters, Sarah and Jane, and a younger brother, Charles.
523174
hello. im christina. i am 25 years old. if you wanna chat add me to yahoo. selenafan1981
392833
The sister does not age at an exponential rate.\n\nBasically, the sister is seventeen years older than her brother, right?  She won't be twice as old as him forever--just that one year! \n\nAnother, easier, example:  older sister is 4, younger sister is 2.  The older sister is twice as old as the younger sister.  The next year, the younger sister will be 3, and the older sister will be 5.  Is the older sister still twice as old?  Of course not! \n\nSo, when the boy is 23, the sister will still be 17 years older.  23+17=40.\n\nThe "twice as old" thing is just there to confuse you.  The question could have easily read:  A boy is 17 years old and his sister is 17 years older than he.  When the boy is 23 years old, what will be the age of his sister.
755386
H e was born July 16, 1948.  I can't find any mention of a sister anywhere on the internet.\n\nHere is a website article about him\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rub%C3%A9n_Blades
328413
What i think is funny is that a large portion of the people who claim Cherokee, claim that their great grandmother was a Cherokee princess. Okay, if your Cherokee and telling the truth, FINE, BUT there was no such thing as royalty in the indigenous nations back in the day...yes there were chiefs...but the false label of "_____ Princess" actually came from when the beautiful young indigenous females that were shipped to "the old world" and forced to slavery within royal family homes...BUT...anybody who did not hold a royal title was not allowed into these homes, so these poor frightened girls were given the titles of "princess" so they could legally enter these estates to slave away;they were usually discarded after age overcame their ability to slave...so only the stories were returned, never the "princesses"...little off the subject, but i wanted to share that fun fact ;)
798635
and their daughter, Sarah, too!
1030271
Katie P. you are one confused lady. First of all, it is miscenegation and it doesn't happen, secondly you are on the Royalty page, and I fail to see how this applies in any way shape or form to the royals.
632723
yes it is wrong!!!! They SHOULD truly love each other because they are siblings.WHEN will the Madness end!!!!????? Where are their parents.......probably just as sick.I would NEVER consider entering an intimate relationship with a family member,that's just INSANE!! But considering where the world is headed,I don't know why I am so shocked.There are NO limits to what people will do these days,and it is bone-chilling to think what will happen next.
664600
Michael is NOT her name. But this was a very interesting question. I found the answer on the Princess' official web site:\n\nTraditionally, all wives of male members of the British Royal Family, the aristocracy and members of the public take the style and title of their husbands. Diana, Princess of Wales was not "Princess Diana" as the media called her, because she was not born a British princess. Her correct title was The Princess of Wales and when she divorced she became Diana, Princess of Wales. When the present Duke of Gloucester was still Prince Richard prior to the death of his father, his wife was known as Princess Richard. It just so happens that Prince Michael is the only grandson of a king titled HRH who is a second son and so there are no other princesses with the name of their husbands. The other princesses in the British royal family were all born into the royal house.
271291
Go to http://www.princess-diana.com\nand you will find all infos, photos and current news\nand more links
799881
she had 2 go.\nshe was about 2 marry a Muslim.\nthe royal family would have never stood 4 it.\nthe future king of England having Muslim half-brothers and sisters!\nthat and she was only a baby incubator 4 Charles, wasn't she?\nhe had his shacking up with Camilla in the pipe-line 4 a long long time.  he always knew Diana would cramp his style.\nmore reasons 4 her 2 go than letting her stay.\nit'll never b fully investigated, not properly.\n2 many people will lose than gain.
561810
i dont t think that prince charles would have got diana killed.\n\nafter all he is not stupid enough that he wont know that he will be the first person on whom the finger of suspicion would be raised.\n\nmoreover it would have been a hell of risk for him to take with the gains nowhere close.\n\ni think that it is another of those conspiracy theories by people who dont have anything worthwhile to do.\n\ni think that his new wife is fabulous. she knows the way she is supposed to carry herself as a member of the royal family and doesnt get herself into controversies.  and both of them love each other very much, what else do you want.\n\nas for his son i think the younger one is a bit headstrong like his mother while the elder seems to be sensible enough.
360317
Princess Diana was born in...\n\nPark House,Sandringham,Norfolk England,UK
572574
The oldest is 18, I think. I would guess that the youngest is maybe 8?
94274
As an American, I have nothing to say about it but then again, the average British subject has nothing to say about it either.  Prince Charles has done very little to regain the popularity he lost following his split with Princess Diana.  His ongoing relationship with Parker-Bowles made him look out of touch with reality, yet the age spread between himself and Diana may have been the biggest problem between the two. They probably could not identify with each others generation. Prince William seems to be the odds on favorite for taking over the throne.  One has to wonder if Charles really wants the job anymore.  His mother could step down and let him have some of the glory, yet she chooses not to relinquish her authority.  I doubt that his marriage to Camille has helped his relationship with mum. So, he may be taking the path of the old Duke of Windsor, its not as though he needs the money.  William would be a fine choice as the next King of England.
947071
ha ha yeah too right!!!i keep putting questions on here about the x factor.....what on earth was nikitta and ray doing in the bottom 2?they are a different league to those brothers!!!!is this world mad? x
484688
does it ever say they only had 2 children ? im guessing they had 50 children