What is the difference between a child prodigy and a child star?
78902
Prodigies are either Musical or Mathematical...
206368
Once you have the basics learned, you have learned how to learn.  The young person is now a teacher, and his best student will always be himself.  He can learn everyday of his life.  He is at his best and brightest with each passing moment.
846569
talent (ability) is something you are born with\nskill is what happens when you practice you craft repeatedly, until you have honed it\nart, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder\n\nthere are virtuouso guitarists, and there are men who play songs based on a melody alone\ni.e. Jimi Hendrix vs Bob Dylan\nboth were wildly successful\nboth arrived there by different methods\nfind your niche, and don't worry what critics say\nyour fans will like you for your uniqueness\n\npeace
893369
yes it sure can and it does\nno one knows how to play tennis or any other game when they are born\nno one is born talented\nits only when they learn the  techniques that they succeed\nppl may have a body structure suited for something and that is a persons luck,not talent\nso,for me,technique definitely surpasses talent.
260720
A hero is someone who puts themselves at risk to help another person. If you used your body to shield a child that someone was shooting at to protect the child you are a hero.\n\nA celebrity is someone famous in pop culture for making a movie, tv show, or being in a band.
887987
As Starlight said, "It's concentration" I bet you did the same as a child, but don't remember doing it. The same goes for a child they don't realise that they are doing this.
766360
The star begins as a cool cloud of gas. Under its own gravity, the cloud begins to collapse. As it collapses, it releases its gravitational energy as radiation. So a young star is cool but bright. We usually don't see these proto-stars, however, because they are generally shrouded in dust and only give off light. \n\nThe proto-star continues to collapse, and as it does, it gets hotter and hotter. "Stars" less than a percent of the Sun's mass eventually halt their collapse due to gas pressure. These stars are "brown dwarfs" or "giant planets," like Jupiter. They never ignite their hydrogen, and gradually dim away. \n\nStars larger than about 0.05 to 0.07 solar masses contract, getting hotter and hotter, until their cores are hot enough to begin burning hydrogen. When a star "turns on" its hydrogen-burning phase, we say that it has reached the main sequence, and is a true star, not a protostar, brown dwarf, or planet. The main sequence is a line of stars plotted on the HR-diagram, which represent stars which are burning hydrogen, fusing it into helium. The fusion process in the core releases heat and light, supporting the star against further gravitational collapse, and making it shine. Stars spend most of their life in one spot on the main sequence. Very massive stars live at the top of the main sequence, shining very blue and very bright, while low-mass stars are dim and red. The sun is between these two extremes. \n\nEventually, the hydrogen in the core whose fusion supports the star begins to run out. The core becomes mostly helium (the product of hydrogen fusion), and hydrogen burning moves out away from the core, forming a burning shell around the core. When this happens, the core begins to collapse again, but the outer regions of the star are pushed outwards. The star becomes brighter and cooler. This is the Red Giant stage. When the sun reaches the Red Giant stage, 5 billion years from now, it will likely grow to engulf Mercury, Venus, and the Earth. \n\nIf the star has little mass, it may end its life here, throwing off its outer layers, creating a planetary nebula out of its atmosphere, and a hot, dense "white dwarf" out of its core. The white dwarf shines only by residual left-over heat, and will eventually fade into a mere cinder. Cores of stars at least half as massive as the sun, however, will eventually collapse and heat enough to start burning helium in their cores. Once helium-burining starts, the star decends the giant branch again, reverses its swelling a bit, and lives happily fusing helium in its core, and hydrogen in a shell around the core. \n\nThen the giant dance begins again. The core helium runs out, and the star once again becomes a red giant. Stars like the sun get off the bus here, and become planetary nebulae and white dwarfs. Heavier stars begin burning carbon. This happens over and over again with heavier and heavier elements. The star ascends and descends the giant branch many times. Lighter stars that don't get hot enough in their cores to burn the next element become planetary nebulae and white dwarfs. Stars that are heavy enough eventually heat their cores enough to begin the next stage of burning and descend the giant branch for a while. For each element, the process is quicker and quicker. A star might burn Hydrogen on the main sequence for billions of years, but once this process gets to, say, silicon, the star might burn silicon for only a few days. \n\nA very massive star, more than 5-10 times solar mass, will ascend and descend the giant branch many times, until the star is ready to burn iron. But iron fusion doesn't release energy; it sucks it up. So what happens is that the star is ascending the giant branch, its iron core is collapsing and heating, until iron is ready to fuse. As soon as it does, though, it absorbs all of the heat around it, chilling the core. All fusion abrubtly stops, and the star implodes. The rebou
1068527
sorry to burst your bubble, but the "people" who have given you this information are mistaken. Children develop at different rates when it comes to walking/talking/communication/development. It has nothing to do with "genius" status or not. \n\nDon't be so quick to want your child to be a "genius"...most who are actually are only masterful in one area, and it is due to developmental problems...not superiority. \n\nLet your baby be a baby....
473650
Technically, it's not miscategorized. A savant is an autistic child who has an extreme ablility to perform in at least one area. A biblical savant in an autistic child who has an extreme ability to memorize biblical scripture. Anything to do with autism involves special ed.
961489
There have always been performers who don't write their own songs the only difference now is we get to see the selection process (all be it done in a more showbiz way). The only effect it might be having is the same as any reality tv show in as much as some young people today want instant fame without any of the hard work and see these shows as their chance to go to the Ivy and live the lifestyle that really doesn't exsist. It very rarely works out for these people.\n\nI think there will always be room for real talent and it will always be recognised (whether you write your own stuff or just perform other people's songs). These programmes are just a flash in the pan in terms of how the music business operates. They're this generation's must see telly, that's all. Real talent will always survive.
315016
When a child is talented in an area but the parents don't support the child's talent... then the child performs onstage and the parents come late to watch their child, they realize that their child is talented and after the show, support their child. (Sister Act 2, School of Rock, Ice Princess)
316513
Both take advantage of children.
139219
Artists are only skilled in one area whereas average people have enough common sense to do all unspecialized things. Artists won't make the best choices because their minds are elsewhere. Artists don't have the common sense most average people have.
1018346
I think that it is ignorance, some people don't realize how smart young children are. They hear and understand everything, so it is very important not to let anyone label them as smart or not smart, pretty or not pretty, etc. I would  reply " they are both, unbelievably, brilliant and beautiful!!"Say that everytime one does something brilliant, the other does something that is equally brilliant. Because, basically, all children will amaze you if given the opportunity to shine in their personal way. Never underestimate the ability of any child as all are special in their own way. Never let anyone destroy that in any child or that child will become what is expected of them, good or bad.
1089044
I don't know, they both look alike to me, so I wouldn't be able to tell ya. Besides, they're too young for me to be thinking they're hot anyway. Ewe! but they are two cute kids. They're probably teens, but they're still minors, and have to go by parental rules, so they're kids to me.
595616
STUDENT>LOCAL PLAYER>U19 PLAYER>JHARKHAND WK BATSMAN>INDIAN STAR.\nSOON WORLD STAR.
471954
Greetings,\n\nI would imagine they both could be depending on the size, age, and life cycle of the particular star.\n\n-matt