Any one can answer this one? It has a mathematical solution.......?
92715
I'll give it a shot. Let Maria = M and Tom = T\nif\nM = 21 + T\nand M = 5T\nThen\nM = 26.25 and T = 5.25. 6 years ago, T would have been - .75 years, or - 9 months. Maria's husband was in bed with her :)
164065
The trick with "proofs" like these are generally an obscured division by zero. One of the lines seems to work, though when you divide to cancel out some factors, the quantity you're dividing by could/does equal zero. It's a trick and doesn't say anything substantial about mathematics.
966925
There are 3 solutions for ABCDEFGHJ -\n\n2 6 7 8 3 5 1 4 9\n2 6 7 9 5 3 1 4 8\n6 7 8 4 1 3 2 5 9
1065017
I'm writing up a proof right now that this is not possible.\n\nCheck out the pdf at:\nhttp://www.geocities.com/euleratuo/
55379
I would say, \n\nonly in the case when n=0 or 1, then this equation stands good! If n is not equal to zero or one, then everytime the answer would definitely be above 1 (even when u use negative integers)
859279
This would be a special case of the Fermat-Catalan Conjecture.\n\nThis conjecture is that there are only a finite number of solutions of x^p + y^q = z^r for 1/p + 1/q + 1/r < 1.  Ten solutions are known, but all of them have the three exponents different (except for 1^p + 2^3 = 3^2) and one exponent equal to 2.\n\nYour conjecture would be the special case that there are no solutions with p > 2 and q = r.  It is already known that there are no solutions with p = q and r > 2 (Darmon and Merel, 1997).
979866
If I am reading this as you have submitted, then, the solution of x=2secx is transcendental, and needs to be solved graphically giving a set of values that satisfy it; you plug that set of values for x that satisfy it into y=3+2tanx, and that gives the solution set for y.
528695
x to the n + y to the n = z to the n where n is an integer? ... damn it's been so long I can't remember for sure. Some Brit solved the proof already.
465495
Zeno ignored the fact that the infinitely many smaller steps take infinitely less amounts of time to do.\n\nAs the earlier answerer pointed out, sum the power series and you get a finite value for the time taken...\n\nLike a lot of these logical tricks, there's something being forgotten or ignored to make it look impossible.
849885
I understand your frustration in receiving no Answer yet to this question, but since I do not have any direct knowledge of how to perform the calculation(s) you need ... I hope the link below serves you well.  It appears to explain the mathematics behind all the concepts you mention.
159422
Is this a trick question? For a given system of linear equations, there is one solution that will yield a particular answer. There are infinite possible systems that will yield that answer (x=-2). There are also multiple ways to arrive at the same  correct answer for a given system. I think we need more info to be of any real help...
478296
Fermat's Last Theorem has been solved ashas the Four Color Theorem. The Poincare conjecture has recently been solved. Trisecting a general angle with unmarked straightedge and compass has been shown to be unsolvable (although it is possible with marked straightedge and compass).\n\nHigh on the list of open problems:\n\nRiemann Hypothesis.\nP=NP?\nTwin prime conjecture.\nAre there any odd perfect numbers?\nProof of existence of solutions to Navier-Stokes equations.
800072
It has one real solution.  Irrational roots are always in groups of two, so there could have been one or three real solutions.\n\nThe real solution is -0.531447857.  Unfortunately, there is not any easy way to find this one other than guess and check.\n\nYou will also note that plotting the line x^3-4x^2+7x+5=y is always increasing.  (The first derivative is always positive).  This tells you that you are guaranteed to only have one real solution.\n\nAnd 2.26... doesn't work
107813
Is this really a math question???\nP.S. I don't know.
910564
umm none that im aware of, what kind of mathamatics leval are you looking at?
930851
... 1 + 1 + 1 equals 3.\n\nDo you make any sense AT ALL?
959197
I have factored it please refer to.\n\nFrom this solution can be found