Who is Dr. Ahmadi nejad?
88366
He is The reason of all dangerous disease in Iran.
98136
Dr. Mahathir Mohammad. I really want to have wits like him.
866863
bush won't talk to him because he knows that Ahmadinejad is much, much smarter than him.  I think a Battle Royal would be the way to go.  I would liek to see bush physically get his ass kicked, rather than mentally like we have seen for 6 years.
1181979
How can you compare.  Iran is not a Democracy - it is an Islamic Theocracy.\nUnder that form of Government - you have no say as to how many hours you work.
276505
Iajuddin Ahmed\n\nI hope this helps!
186517
Hossein Rezazadeh from Iran
740674
Without addressing the question of whether the assassination of Ahmadinejad would be practical or strategically desirable, if he is aggressively threatening the safety and stability of the free world, then it would be moral without question. To parallel my answer to your Hitler question, assassination of Ahmadinejad would, in that circumstance, be a defensive tactic, not an aggressive one. The question is whether Ahmadinejad can yet be considered the aggressor. \n\nAhmadinejad is seeking atomic weapons.  He has called for the elimination of Israel as a state.  He has openly stated that, while it would take several atomic weapons to destroy Iran, it would take only one to destroy Israel, based on its size.  He supports Hamas and Hezbollah, both of which aggressively attack Israel and threaten regional stability.  He seeks to use his proxies, Hezbollah and Syria, to choke off democracy in Lebanon.  He foments violence in Iraq in order to destabilize the democracy there and to frustrate US interests.  Are these actions bringing us inevitably toward war?  If so, then a preemptive assassination would be moral in light of the alternative.\n\nIf the choice is to kill one man now, or to kill hundreds of thousands later, then it is moral to kill one man now. I don't think we have enough information at this point to answer that question, nor do we have enough information to examine fully the practical pros and cons (but that is a separate question). \n\nOn another note, the fact that Ahmadinejad was democratically elected is of no consequence.  Hitler was democratically elected also.
172507
Minister Louis Farrakhan.\n\nLM
415168
Mohammad Khatami isn't the president of Iran anymore, Ahmadinejad is.
581620
I think Mr. Ahmadinejad is 100% correct in his assessment of Mr. Bush and his Presidency.  I read the entire letter and agreed with most of it.  I probably agree with him more than I agree with my own President.  I still think it is scary for Iran to have nuclear weapons and hope they will work within the international parameters for nuclear energy.
915514
"Put God in the centre:\nHis pure representatives guide the leaders..\nThe leaders lead the country in a divine way..."\n\nDo you have any idea how much that sounds like the Taliban ... or the current theocracy in Iran?\n\nDid you translate this from Arabic or Persian yourself?
144887
yes it's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad / Ahmadi Nejad
675009
It's not that secret, you can find a copy at\nhttp://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/ahmadinejad0509.pdf\n\nIt's a bit long-winded, but worth a read. He makes some interesting points, but they are wasted on dubya, who wants Iran do do whatever he says, but refuses to discuss anything with them or listen to anything they have to say.
2588
General Haj Ali Razmara was the Iranian Premier from June of 1950 until he was assassinated in March of 1951 by Navab Safavi, the leader of an Islamic terrorist. \n\nGeneral Haj Ali Razmara, Born in 1900, he rose through the Cossack Division to the rank of general through distinguished service in the suppression of revolts, his skills as an organizer, and the patronage of Shah Reza Khan. Appointed Prime Minister by the Shah in 1950, Razmara pursued policies intended to decentralize government, improve living conditions and create provincial assemblies. His tenure was brief because he alienated domestic political groups and the Western powers.
874335
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi Shaw of Iran 41-79. American puppet who loved the playboy lifestyle, easy to corrupt and control. In 51 Dr. Mohammad Mossadegh had the brilliant idea of nationalizing their oil industry, and it passed into law unanimously. The Communists were moving in and getting tight with the Iranians. President Eisenhower got together with the British and the walls came tumbling down. We just discovered a new huge deposit of oil. Welcome back Shaw. Which eventually led to Khomeini, and I'm sure you know the rest. When we will we ever learn? Greed. Too much isn't enough. Peace.
591247
Unlike the treasonous previous answer.The DE-facto leader of Iran is the closest thing to Adolph Hitler that I have seen in my lifetime.If he continues with his antisemitic and anti American tirades Israel or the United States are going to not only turn Iran into a parking lot,But this man may set off WW111 in our lifetime.He should be relegated to the dustbin of history like all the tyrants before him.He is under estimating the international communities resolve to keep his radical regime without nuclear technology that will threaten their neighbors and the entire region.He is just a puppet of the Mullahs that actually run that country. We should have dealt with these people 27yrs. ago when they took our citizens hostage.The chickens are coming home to roost and we should deal with this rag head and the rest of his fanatical followers now.Diplomacy be damned!Show these savages where Americas nuts really hang.
598890
Why don't you show it to Ali Khamenei or Ahmadinejad? \nThey will be very keen to meet the 'King of Iran' and pay their respects.