How about Feinstein and Boxer in 2008?
81967
I wont vote for either one.  I dont vote for Liberal Abortionists.
506775
you would most likely have non boxing people in positions to make important decisions for the sport and this is most likely a bad thing. Although fresh perspectives are often nice, there may be a bit of a decrease in the voice of those who are actually in the know so to speak. Also there is the threat that we might regress to the mean in terms of the good state commissions. While many states are likely to have better commission work through a federal commission there are states that probably will have the quality of their work watered down as a result of what would most likely be an increasing bueracracy. Also theres a likelyhood that things will fall through the cracks. The prospect of dealing with a nationwide commission is going to make small time fight cards very difficult to run properly by all the codes because of the sheer volume of fight cards that will need to be dealt with.
746602
Very interesting point.  The only reason dems got control was because of the blue-dog conservative democrats who were elected this time around.  America hasn't gone less conservative...only less republican.  Now, the dem leadership isn't taking the hint.  Instead, they're reeling to the left once again.  Should be interesting.  I personally think it will open the door for a sweeping Repub victory in '08 - if they get back to their conservative roots.  Great point.
774623
Green Donkey ~\n                           This is the worst decade ever for boxing! There are some bright spots, some fighters that can make a splash, Taylor, Wright, Barrera, Cotto and Duddy but there's so many overrated, over-hyped fighters out there that are handpicking opponents just to collect belts or to stay a "Champion" just a little longer like Mayweather, he turned down 6 million dollars more to fight a young and hungry Antonio Margarito and Valuev, he and Don King are feeding him lots of small Heavyweights that couldn't break a egg so he can remain undefeated.\n   The worst is, you have the "Fans" that don't know anything about the sport call people "Great" You seem to have figured it out, you came to this forum and asked a question because you kinow that things aren't right.
471318
Barbara Boxer\nand\nDianne Feinstein
28833
I've been following Chavez Jr's career for the past couple of years, and have been impressed by his maturity in the ring. However, he hasn't seemed to have learned very much, and I sometimes wonder just how much further he can advance as a professional boxer. \n\nJulito's fight last December against Carlos Molina ended in a draw, and his rematch with him next month (February 18th) will tell us definitely what we can expect from him in the future. My guess is that he will go remain undefeated for the rest of this year against slightly better opponents, but will inevitably get his first loss when he faces much tougher opposition sometime in 2007.
120918
The answer is yes, as above, starting in 2008.
598078
For Senator Boxer:\nhttp://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm?CFID=148315&CFTOKEN=10868173\n\nFor Senator Feinstein:\nhttp://feinstein.senate.gov/email.html
748826
Remember the Barrera v. Morrales fight?  Smokin!!!!  But you know what?  Those wars, guys leave something in the ring everytime they have one.  And Barrera, as amazing as some of his fights have been, has left a lot in the ring.  So how much does Barrera have left?  He is not an old boxer if you want to count candles on the birthday cake.  But he is old if you count years in the ring, number of fights, and number of wars.  The PS2 nut below is right in that Barrera has slowed down.  I hate to say this, but if I was a betting man, my dollar would not be on Barrera... (sorry Tony)
437956
Do you mean the next president (who will be elected in November 2008)?  Out of the likely candidates, my favorite is Russ Feingold (Senator from Wisconsin).  He is against the Patriot Act, against the Iraq war, co-wrote campaign finance reform, and seems to be the only Senator with the courage and conviction to stand up against Bush.
1160684
Probably 2008. But it better not be Hilary.
870193
Several years ago. Around 2000.
869290
Buffman for President in 08!!
52547
Well, I'm sure he would have still been born. Stone wasn't his father or anything. I think he would still have been a pretty good boxer, but as for ever getting a title shot, I'm not sure. A lot of what goes into getting those rankings and title shots has to do with politics.
242401
Naseem Hamed announced last November that he would be making a comeback, but he's said that before also. He commented on his prospected comeback: "I've really missed boxing because I've been doing it for a hell of a long time, and I consider myself not bad at it. But then again I think boxing has missed me and it's time to get back and do some stuff. My confidence has never really gone. I'm raring to go after a good three-year lay-off. I believe I can be even better."\n\nHe's also scheduled for a March 31st court date regarding a car accident he was in last year.
762802
Yes, the partisan rantings will subside...but only briefly. Once the candidates for 2008 start to chime in, then it will start all over again!
176974
Dennis Kucinich so far. Haven't seen a serious contender list yet though.