Can the threat Advisory System ever go to green Green(Low)?
83501
still no answers? not an advert, just trying to share info.\ngovernment explained simply,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=98\nmoney,\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\neducation,\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/taylor_stream.html\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/gatto_stream.html\nww1 wilson,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=88\n\nhttp://www.philipdru.com\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com\nhttp://thestressblog.com\nhttp://www.antiwar.com\nhttp://www.kaos959.com
1008607
he ignores any warning, bush is fucking it up for everyone, politically, environmentally- would it radicalize you if a foreign power dropped bombs on your family? we're running out of time with greenhouse gasses, that means you and your children wherever we live
475645
No.  Gestapo is an acronym for Geheime Staaspolezi, or Secret State Police.  The "green police" are officers or officials in a government charged with ensuring environmental standards are upheld, such as no toxic waste being dumped in the river at night.
664558
Yes. There is a realistic chance of a Green being elected.\n\nThe Green Party concentrated on a small number of seats at the last election, for instance one in Brighton, where they got a substantial number of votes, and where it is quite conceivable further improvement would take them into the lead.\n\nThe Greens were handicapped by lack of money. The other parties in  2005 raised resources by means which are now coming under legal scrutiny. It is likely that new means of funding will have to be found in future if democracy is to function efectively, and if these reflect numbers of party members and/or general supporters this could help the Greens. Of course, arrangements fostered by established parties could have the opposite effect, particularly because the Greens could get caught in the cross-fire if the establishment acts to make the system unfavourable for an extremist party. If State funding were given at least partly in relation to votes received, this would change voting preferences as there would be a reason to support a minor party for funding reasons rather than voting. To a minor extent this already happens. For example, a Green/Labour floating voter in a seat like Canterbury, where before 2005 Labour was roughly 2000 votes behind the Tories and the Greens had 3.0% of the vote, had to think whether to vote Labour tactically or whether Labour was going to lose anyway on an obviously adverse swing and it was better to vote Green in the hope of getting their vote to 5.0% and saving their deposit.    \n\nA generation ago, very few candidates outside the Labour and Conservative Parties got elected - the Liberals only had 6 MPS in the 1950s, and even this was because the Tories did not stand against them in seats such as Huddersfield West and Bolton West. Now there are more MPs both from parties Like the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists and from minor parties like George Galloway from Respect. If they can get in, why not the Greens? To emphasise this point, the Scottish Nationalists and Plaid Cymru were founded before the Second World War, but with one very brief exception in 1945 did not get MPs elected until the 1960s, after which they have won seats at every election. The Greens are further back in a process that can take decades to generate success.\n\nI hope it doesn't happen, but if there were a major and obvious environmental distaster (as opposed to the insidious disaster of global warming), particuarly if it were shortly before or during an election, it might have a major effect on voting for the Greens. Imagine if a UK nuclear power station exploded like Chernobyl a week before a General Election.\n\nTens of Green councillors have been elected under First Past The Post in the United Kingdom. The Green Party has a role to support these Councillors and its MEPs. Also, even parties that do not get elected can exert political pressure. So the Party has no reason to disband because of lack of MPs.\n\nI have tried to answer on the basis of past history and personal experience of politics. Whether you want a Green Party candidate to be elected to Westminster is another matter.
388397
Most would be content to get rid of cars until it comes to their own. Not realizing that horses polluted the ozone far more than cars we have today. No sense in complaining because in some cases an environmental check is good for us as long as it does not brake the bank and this won't. It may be possible that because of them(greenies) there will be alternative modes of extraction. Now there is only a few modes of extraction wherein only 20% efficiency is obtained. The realm of perpendicular drilling has not been explored yet. Mark my words you will see those things explored very shortly.
1153452
they are too green to burn
1087203
reduce greenhouse gases.
825661
Be afraid be very afraid. They are an advisory group. Brent Scowcroft has served under numerous Presidents and on numerous military commission. Seriously whatever they are doing is not good that is pretty much a guarantee.
262700
Global warming,green house effects,thinning layer of the ozone
277396
It's an out of the frying pan into the fire situation. Governmental ecological powers do indeed create havoc over there while common GIs hardly plan to harm anybody deliberately.
1046194
haha, it's not easy being green, is it?
1102108
It depends who the Republicans choose and who the Democrats choose. And if it's close enough, it could depend on whether or not the Democrats harass Green Party volunteers like they did in 2004 to keep Nader off the ballots.
1089027
yes.In the past three decades there has been a global awakening regarding environmental issues. Considerable progress is being made in addressing a variety of complex and technical problems associated with a historical disregard of these issues. But environmental issues continue to be some of the most important and perplexing problems facing all governments today.\n\nPart of the difficulty facing politicians and the public is the technical complexity of the subject. A full understanding of the risks that we face is often limited to scientists who specialize in a particular field of knowledge. On some issues there is serious disagreement among scientists which puts lay policy makers in a very difficult dilemma. 2\n\nThe resolution of environmental problems also involves a careful balancing of competing interests and values. Although business interests frequently resist attempts at environmental regulation, this resistance usually reflects a public demand for products and development. Some environmental activists oppose many aspects of further human economic development because of threats to the remainder of the ecosystem. Others are chiefly concerned about current and future threats to the health of the human population. 3\n\nEnvironmental issues present special difficulties for developing countries. These countries pose a big potential threat of exacerbating threats to the environment. But absent massive infusions of assistance from richer countries, they cannot afford to match environmental controls being adopted by developed countries.\n\nIn August 2002, a global environmental summit sponsored by the United Nations convened in Johannesburg, South Africa. Despite some agreements, the meeting is an overall disappointment for many environmental activists. The positive spirit which had been generated from a similar meeting in Rio de Janiero ten years earlier was absent. Much of the criticism was directed at the United States. President Bush was one of the few major heads of state who chose not to attend
1118612
That's the traffic light on the information superhighway... when it's red, all the information has to stop, it can only go on green.  \n\nThis method is commonly used to prevent data packet collisions and thus minimize loss of data and resent packets.  Nothing clogs up a system more than having to resend a bunch of packets... it can be a real mess.  \n\nEvery once in a while, you will get some rouge program (probably from CANADA) that does not adhere to the red / green convention, and just runs amok.  If this is the case, you have to call the information superhighway patrol (ISHP) and get them to write that guy a ticket.  \n\nCheers!
1125764
The best way to attack is not by threatening!\nMost likely, if you can manage to be your friends so that you supply them, then they will depend on you and eventually they will turn to your clients => friends!\nStates are difficult to be extinguished, especially when they are supported by the world leaders.
435789
Use your greenness-meter.
959652
Only if we stay on them...keep their feet to the fire!\n\nIt takes determination, diligence, and tenacity on our part...without any room for fatigue.  We must endure until we secure!