What is the best solution for current war environmet created by Bush.?
89825
well, the environment of this wasn't created by Bush, he mearly reacted to the situation, the only way he could. He of course was first provoked into it by 9/11.  Then the bad intellegence he got, didn't help matters any.  Everything that Saddam said he wouldn't do, he continued throughout the Clinton era, because he knew there would be a blind eye turned his way.
694976
Get the help of the UN. The UN has had many ideas for Iraq but our US government wanted to go it alone and we did. Now we are not only stuck with the mess we have paid out BILLIONS for the war.\nWhen does it stop?\nMaybe we should secure their borders to keep the terrorists out so they can rebuild their governement and cites and infastructure. We can commit to one year and then they are on their own. If they know we will not continue to throw money at their cause and that we expect them to work out their own problems and rebuilding effort they will work much faster. As it is now they dont really care the US will pay pay pay (with military and money).\n\nPut it back on their shoulders to get the job done.
424538
IT IS NOT GOVERNMENT! IT IS THE PEOPLE IN OFFICE, BUSH AND HIS BAND OF IDIOTS!!!  We have a President that does not care to much for the enviorment and his record proves that!          Instead of fighting pollution, the Bush Administration has undermined critical environmental protections by:\n\n    * Weakening clean air and clean water standards;\n    * Slowing the clean up of toxic waste dumps;\n    * Ignoring global warming;\n    * Breaking its promise to repair and maintain our national parks; and\n    * Undermining protection for public lands. The only people who will benefit from the war on Iraq are the elite wealthy oil men who finance Bush's election campaigns, and people like Bush who have huge personal investments in the oil industry. Oil company profits have already increased by fifty percent this year because of the war, and the invasion hasn't even started yet!   His family made there wealth with oil and continues to stay in bed with them!
783487
Bush likes to emulate John Wayne.  Just walk into the bar and challenge anyone to a fight.  Though the Duke never followed the Bush doctrine of "shoot first and ask questions later."  It would be nice if Bush were forced into having more chairs at the table, but his agenda does not call for the kind of help you describe.  Mayor Daly once said in Chicago, "our police are not here to prevent disorder but to preserve it."  I think Bush's plan for the middle east has all along been to destabilize the region,not to make it right.  The other countries you mention could all prove helpful, but that might disturb the no bid Halliburton contracts Cheney obtained for his company.  We can only hope.
134443
Ask G.W. Bush. Thanks to his vendetta, it doesn't look like we're gonna get out of there anytime soon.
1087149
keeping the republicans is way to expensive and as far as it seems pretty dangerous too , not wonder all countries around the world do not like America . \n\nbush and his people have done nothing but to impose their one way policies and have made sure to get as much money as possible in their way out we just have to see at the bicepresident to see what I'm talking about .\n\nglobal warning is also a huge problem which has been addressed by all countries and ignored by bush and and his team . we as Americans must make sure to elect a new good president and not another nature killer .\n\nthere is also the enormous problem which this administration has created whit their searching for nonexistent WMDs problem which not only has stuck America in an endless war but it has killed thousands of innocent people and has bring more hate and anger towards America .\n\nso i really hope the next  president and the new leaders are responsible people who will not take personal issues and make them into huge problems .
967772
Don't be fooled by these responses. One above even claims that Australia is the only one complying, well Australia is not even a member of the treaty. Bush has many constituents and among one of them is carbon-based fuel industry that is the biggest polluter sending tons of pollution to the environment. Perhaps, instead of focusing on why he doesn't participate, we should focus on why he withdrew from the previous commitment made by the Clinton administration, it is clear they saw the threat of global warming. It's failure to understand that many of our problems today will have to be solved by our children tomorrow what keeps people from focusing on the real problems. Most just worry about their "today" taking tomorrow for granted; it is an egocentric and very selfish point of view. I'd rather sacrifice a little bit of the economy for a world in which my children don't have to wear gas masks or pay 100 dollars for a glass of drinking water. They (Bush and his cronies) just think we can clean up the earth when it all becomes a mess, and in a matter of seconds reverse the damage of what has taken millions of years to become an equilibrium. It is intelligent design what has created those "unintelligent minds" that oppose world conservation.
27420
GLOBAL WARMING!!! this is a big issue. you could research a lot on that. or you could do the war in Iraq.
958215
I was mad when the liberals wanted to block drilling for oil in Alaska during the beginning of George W. Bush's presidency, and now look at our dilemna!  I am very environmentally conscious and bike and walk when I can but I believe extremes will get us nowhere.  We have to look after our pocketbooks AND the environment.  There is a middle ground.  Show me a preservationist who doesn't drive and I will listen to him!
494155
good point.....   relay this to Mr. Bush
873340
I definitely agree with you.  I also disagree with Kaboom.  The Bush administration preemptively invaded a nation and then did their crimes against humanity but dropping the equivalent of 1/4 million Nagasaki bombs of depleted uranium (DU)in their secret nuclear war.  Despite gulf war syndromes coming from all four places we have used DU, despite 13,000 gulf war vets dying, despite 67% of them having kids with serious birth defects, Bush used it again harming our troops while using them to gain support for himself.\n\nDespite birth deformities in Irauis infant so horrific I have never seen anything like them from our first use of DU under his dad, Bush administration use it again so now birth deformities are up 1000% and will be even worse since we upped the amount used several times.  Cancer is also up 1000% so more deaths.\n\nThen consider that all food and water is contaiminated in the region for 4 1/2 billion years and people who won't even know us will die and suffer extreme sickensses and birth deformities of the same horrific nature (google the words severe birth deformities (and crimes against huminity) and look if you dare (scroll down the page). \n\nThen think how we also exposed our allies to it and their countries as it has spread to 15 countires including Europe as it has been found even here from testing over 400 miles from the test site and p[lants.  Since we have connected air and water ways, soon all human DNa could be damafged as well as that of other species. (For instance, birds were found melted to tree branches.\n\nThese deaths are in addition to higher number of abortions, 45 million without health care (and all the deaths and suffering that causes), suicides (and rise in domestic violence and child abuse) that results from outsourcing of jobs, inability to find a job of a living wage, and from loss of 50 billion in cuts from various social programs..when vets hospitals are used, food programs diminished, housing cut and resulting homelessness, deaths and suffering are a result. There are death from the environmetal damage and substandard food we eat due to lobbying etc and then there is death and suffering for future generations by the ignoring of global warming.\n\nI think history will judge him and what was done on his watch as the greates act of terrorism and crimes against humanity ever seen of this planet.  Plus when you drop napalm, du etc on Iraqis, they are angry and easy to recruit to terrorism as wheh you see most of the dead (100,000 to 600,000) are under the age of 15 or woman, you generally want revenge so attacks may take place in retaliation for our use of DU. Midwives are scared to deliver the babies as the moms go hysterical, etc when their Frankenstein like baby..so long awaited..is born.  You cant do that kind of things to others and not have it eventually come back on you.
486012
We'd be so much better off! He isn't perfect by any means but Iraq never would have happened and I believe neither would 9-11. \nThe environment certainly would have been better off!\nHow many people would be alive today if Bush hadn't been in?\nThousands-many thousands!
1039731
Please note the first five entries were made PRIOR to President Bush becoming our president.... and then, we have Hiliary's entry!\n\n\n"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." \nPresident Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998. \n\n"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." \nPresident Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998. \n\n"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." \nMadeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998. \n\n"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." \nSandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 \n\n"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." \nLetter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998. \n\n"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." \nSen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 \n\nNOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!! \n\nAnd now.....Reported on FoxNews 6/21/2004\n\nWASHINGTON — The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday. \n\n"We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.\n\nReading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."\nHe added that the report warns about the hazards that the chemical weapons could still pose to coalition troops in Iraq.\n\n"The purity of the agents inside the munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives and environmental storage conditions. While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal," Santorum read from the document.\n\n"This says weapons have been discovered, more weapons exist and they state that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from the materials that are or may still be in Iraq," said Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.\n\nThe weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it show
1020491
Yes, y not?  Bush is trying to rid a country of murderous assholes.  Hes doing the right thing.  and all the people that say the war is bad and all that, just talk to someone in the military that has been over there.  they will all tell you how proud they were to be over there, to see the faces of the people they have helped and to have so many people coming up to them and thanking them, so just shut up about the war.
808157
Hey hey LBJ,  how many kids did you kill today?  It sounds like the same people running this one ran Vietnam.  Bush is not there to prevent disorder,but to  preserve it.  All so the plunder can continue while our military are security police for Halliburton and whatever other agents are there carrying out the plunder.  And don't forget we threw Afghanistan in as well.  Tell it like it is.  It does not exceed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but it is right up there on the scaremeter.  Well done!
885731
getting rid of bush for starters
200210
Stand firm on getting Iraq self sufficient.  Don't back down just because people are bellyaching.  Finish what was started and just take the critisism.  Future generations will appreciate GWB for his tenacity even though our generation is blinded by the trees and can't see the forest.