mouse is vegeterian or nonvegeterian ?
85762
both , eats cheese and eats vegetables, so he is a vegetarian , and eats other stuff too.
122693
Hope this helps\n\nhttp://www.ergo-items.com/cursorControl.htm?engine=adwords!2742&keyword=%28pen+mouse%29&match_type=
333012
The mouse is mightier!!!
659354
Dead plants and animals cannot be said to occupy a level in the food chain as being dead they are not able to eat and therefore occupy the lowest space on the trophic level  as food for fungus, microbes, insects, animals and other plant life.\n\nStrange question.
410797
500 years ago, Paracelsus, an early chemist, doctor and alchemist (which, at the time, was still a going concern) wrote (in German):\n\n"Alle Ding' sind Gift und nichts ohn' Gift; allein die Dosis macht, das ein Ding kein Gift ist."\n\nThis means:\n"All things are poison and nothing (is) without poison; only the dose makes that a thing is no poison." \n\nWhatever science may think of some of his stranger pursuits, the wisdom of this statement is undisputable.  Every substance will kill you if you ingest enough of it, even water.  (And, no, I'm not talking about drowning.)\n\nAny substance that can damage a DNA molecule can be a carcinogen.  This includes nearly every molecule, again, including water.  The only completely non-carcinogenic substances I can think of would be the noble gasses (helium, neon, etc.)  They are chemically inert and do not readily react with much of anything.  Even that's not completely safe because radon is a radioactive noble gas (so easily a carcinogen) and some of the others probably have radioactive isotopes.\n\nIt's worth noting that despite the earlier "answer", natural things are full of carcinogens.  Plants are filled with pesticides of their own creation.  Why not?  Plants don't like being eaten any more than you would.  Natural pesticides are simply the result of their evolution.  These pesticides are designed to, yes, KILL animals.  That includes you.  Of course, we don't eat the ones that have enough of those chemicals to kill us in the short term, and only a few of our foods (such as, I'm told, Okra, which supposedly has the highest levels of natural pesticides of any food regularly eaten by humans) have enough pesticides to be really worth avoiding.  Nonetheless, the chemicals aren't intended to be good for you and some of them do indeed contribute to cancer.\n\nFunny irony:  Plants grown "naturally" or "organically" have more natural pesticides than those grown by supposedly bad, unnatural modern techniques.  "Organically" grown plants are exposed to more insects, and the plants respond by pumping up excess carcinogens and other poisons into their tissues.  Plants protected by artificial, external pesticides have less trouble with pests, so don't produce as many poisons.  Guess what, you cannot wash off internal, natural pesticides like you can the artificial ones humans add.\n\nAgain, the dosage of these natural pesticides is still usually too small for concern.  Still, if you want my advice, avoid overpriced "organic" foods.\n\nRemember the Alar scare from quite a few years back?  Everyone worried about the Alar on apples being carcinogenic.  Everyone ignoring the plain fact that the supposedly dangerous aspect of Alar was that it broke down into unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH).  UDMH is found in much higher doses in supermarket mushrooms than found on treated apples.  The treated apples were banned, the mushrooms remain on the shelves to this day, protected by the strange and irrational sense of safety the phrase "all natural" gives to people.\n\nMind you, I'm not saying the mushrooms are dangerous.  They aren't.  Neither were the treated apples.  The dose makes the poison and neither has enough to worry about.  The news media likes scare stories, so it prints them without much regard for the facts of the issues.
1013286
No the mouse will look for the cheese with his eyeballs not his head he will keep his head still and move his eyes you could try, though.
783710
Mouse.... animal.... right.\n\nThat is to say the aspects which make them part of the Kingdom Animalia...\n\nSimple:\n#1. They're eukaryotic. That is to say for the most part they're multicellular, and have a cell structure including mitochondria, a complete genome and organelles.\n#2. They're heterotrophic. They derive energy from outside sources, rather than making their own as plants and fungi do.\n#3. No cell walls... just cell membrane holding the cell contents in. Obviously none of the required organelles used by autotrophic life either, since as previously mentioned they're heterotrophic.\n\n\nThats the basic answer for you.\nAny further characteristics of mice will not be shared by ALL members of Animalia.... in some cases merely most (such as differentiated tissues) and in some cases not many at all (whiskers, for instance).
454469
Mice, monkeys, plant eating insects.
420292
herbivore is the name given to plant eating animals
619355
The answer is fauna.\n\nFauna is the generic term for the animals in an area, flora is the term for the plants.
274141
Mushrooms are not autotrophs as they cannot manufacture their own food.
877839
sure...well not all the keys. you can eat the odd keys you dont use very much...or actually if you eat all of them then you wouldnt have to ask such insane questions. hmm???? um, as far as eating the mouse you should cook it first to kill germs and uh it. um...what else, the moose, you could give the moose the mouse to distract it so you can run away from it since you are eating your computer anyways you wont miss the mouse.
395
According to the bible, it was God.\nAccording to Darwin, it was natural evolution.\nMany others will convince you that it was Steve Jobs and Apple.\n\nThe answer, according to http://www.superkids.com/aweb/pages/features/mouse/mouse.html, is Doug Engelbart.\n\n(which I found via this Yahoo! Search http://myweb2.search.yahoo.com/search?p=who+invented+the+mouse.)
1172492
As a vegetarian I feel qualified to answer that. It's called Tofurkey. It is a dome shape with stuffing that is supposed to look like a turkey but really looks like a very smooth brain.\n\nhttp://airferg.com/i/tofurkey.jpg\n\nHorrifying, isn't it?
262343
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/mouse.htm
439195
A mouse, of course!  Since it is my nickname, it would only be appropriate to choose to be a mouse.
713831
yes, I once had a potato look like a mouse, pretty funny.