Math help please. I need answers right now, no joke.?
86546
(3y+1)(-2)+y\n-6y-3+y\n-5y-3\n\n12s+(7-s)2\n12s+14-2s\n10s+14\n\n7x-3x(x+1)\n7x-3x^2-3x\n-3x^2+4x\n\n3t(t-5)+6t^2\n3t^2-15t+6t^2\n9t^2-15t\n\n4w^2-w(2w-3)\n4w^2-2w^2+3w\n2w^2+3w
691620
(sigh)... Req = R1 + R2 + ...\n\nReq = 5 + 3 = 8.\n\nYay, I win.
883460
Please see the answer above and find out the missing factor in your calculation. You are in the right track. All the best!
339198
2x0 = 0\nIt'll be the same as today... :P
843943
4, 0, -2, -2, 0\n\nFigure it out! Don't be lazy!
1070468
Mutiply $28 by 0.30, then subrtact 28 again, and that should tell you how much it is. ($19.60. It will come up as -19.60 though, just ignore the negative)
22859
Subract the two terms on the left giving:\n-2t < 16\n\nAdd 2t to both sides giving\n0 < 16 + 2t\n\nSubtract 16 from both sides\n\n-16 < 2t\n\nDivide both sides by 2\n\n-8 < t
307282
that math formula that proves it is SO WRONG! i just talked about this with someone, if you look at the formula it gets messed up like halfway through.\n\ndo we need to break this down?\none fish + one fish = 2 fish
781088
Plug in 2 for x to determine this:\n\n3(2) + 5 = 6+5 = 11 ≠ 17\n\nTherefore 2 is not a solution.\n\n~ ♥ ~
268888
I think I can do this one...I'll get right back to you when I figure it out... *grabs a pen and paper...and also tries to figure out why people are answering, saying simply that they can't or won't answer your question*\n\nEDIT...k, here's what I got...not sure if I understood what your question was asking, so I may be mistaken...\n\nm=h(x)-2x\nk=(2-3h(x))/6x
959479
all you need to do is go to www.webmath.com, it'll help u there!\n\nI always do my math problems to that site if ever i get stuck on something! It's helpful!
103215
With this given data, it is not possible\n\nalthough the area is totalling to be 70 for both cases (7*10 and two pieces of 8*8 + 1*6) but with one division only, this is not possible\n\nPLEASE DO LET ME KNOW IF THERE IS SOME SOLUTION (i found it very interesting)
1005028
if \na=(v-u)/t\nthen\na*t=v-u\nthen\nt=(v-u)/a\nor\nt=(15-0)/0.75 \n\nSo as the previous poster says the answer really is 20
858552
Have you tried these?  Surely you've been told that division by 0 isn't possible, so there's your answer for 7.  I'm not doing any others on Yahoo answers (too many at once), but if you really need help and are willing to do as much as possible for yourself I'll help you if you email h_chalker@yahoo.com.au, but nasty Maths teachers like me won't just hand you 7 answers on a plate!
1135408
OH NOES THIS IS LIKE A MATH PROBLEM!!!! i can't handle any more variables :( sry.\n\n\nhahahaha.
618077
go to www.curnaturecalculus.com  They have all the answers.\n\nSplooch!
67957
First you multiply 10x264. Then multiply the answer by 9.658. This is a math problem, not a number.