what is the law in dubai regarding pregant single woman?
92006
dont have an abortion.  it would probably be hard considering how conservative the country is compared to the west.  however there are not places to help with the child like there are in the us.  best bet is probably to just do your best or move to the states for a short time but im not aware of any law
860529
In my opinion it sounds like a good law. Its may be the womans body, but its the mans sperm. If the father wants to take care of his daughter/son then he should be able to. The woman and man created the baby, not just the woman.
666251
yes you can, some people even have peroids while they are pregant, which shouldnt happen but has.
954671
The answer is actually very simple.\n\nThere are four discrete parts/stages to the pregnancy and child raising process. Becoming pregnant, remaining pregnant (pre-viability), remaining pregnant (post viability) and providing for the child after it is born. These stages define, both medically and legally, the rights of those involved.\n\nYour philosophy teacher has apparently studied neither law nor medicine, for the answer to the question is obvious once you look at the medical and legal statuses involved. Some people might not like the medical terminology that this answer uses, but it is the clearest to make the point.\n\nThe 'becoming pregnant' stage requires a minimum of two participants, in three roles -- the sperm donor (aka father) and the egg donor (aka mother), and the person providing the womb to carry the embryo (aka host-mother or surrogate). The latter two roles (mother and host-mother) are often the same person, but medically they do not need to be.\n\nLook at it first medically. Before pregnancy, both (or all three) are involved. During pregnancy, only the host-mother is involved, with one more person (the child) becoming involved at the point of independent viability. After pregnancy, none of the original two/three is directly involved -- only the child is.\n\nLet’s break that down into more detail. Before and during concept, both the egg and sperm donor, and the host-mother must all consent to the process. At this stage, both donors have equal say in whether they contribute, and thus have equal rights as to their involvement (or not). And the host-mother certainly has a legal say over whether she becomes pregnant in the first place. In other words, any one of them refusing prevents the pregnancy from ever occurring. So, because they must all consent to become involved, as a matter of law, they all have equal rights to prevent the pregnancy from ever occurring.\n\nOK. But during pregnancy, neither the egg donor nor the sperm donor are involved medically. Neither is continuing to provide any support, medically, for the child -- unless the egg donor also happens to be the host-mother. But whether she is or not, the two legal roles are distinct for a very important reason.\n\nDuring the pregnancy, the host-mother is the only one medically involved. In fact, she is only involved in her capacity as the life-support system for the child, providing nourishment literally out of her own body. In the case where the egg donor is different than the surrogate, it is only the surrogate -- the person whose body is undergoing the life-sustaining process, the host-mother -- only she is directly physically involved. \n\nSince she is the only one medically involved in this stage of the process, she is the only one who can consent, or withhold her consent, to remain involved. As such, she is the only one who has legal rights at this stage whether to choose an abortion or not. Nobody else is physically involved, so nobody else has the physical ability to affect the process by withholding consent.\n\nAlso note that right to choose only applies during the pre-viability portion. Once the fetus can survive on its own, it has its own independent rights as a living being, and all the mother can do is have the child put on external life support. In other words, while she can still choose (consenting or withholding consent) as to whether she remains involved in the process, that choice cannot override the fetus’s rights, because the fetus can be put in an incubator even if the host-mother decides to opt-out. Notice the important fact that the host-mother granting or withholding consent only affects her personal medical involvement, not what happens to anyone else involved.\n\nAfter birth, none of the original two (father / mother) or three (sperm donor / egg donor / host-mother) is involved medically. None of them. So, none of them have the option of withholding consent to their continued biological involvement, because none of
491281
Consult a lawyer or the reference section of a library.\n\nDo your own search on the net for starters to find out the laws of the country where you are - we can't answer this as there is no info as to where you are!\n\nCheers
653993
Girl..im proud of you! and for the person down below about not a wearing a viel in afghanistan and women voting...all these aspects are becasue of the EXTREMIST GOVERNMENTS in these countries and not because of Islam...Why dont you look at UAE. UAE is a muslim country with Churches, Temples and muslims arent FORCED to wear a Viel either. There are women in government positions eg Sheikha Lubna. The things happening in Pakistan like honour killing are not justifiable by Islam and are Wrong!!! Islam does not encourage this kind of behaviour.
505191
I have been in almost the same situation. my bf got his ex gf pregnant while we were on a short break. I went back to him and now the child is almost 3. The ex is CRAZY, wont leave us alone. We have to pay 127 a WEEK in child support, which we cant afford and havent been able to pay the whole 127 a week so my now husband will be going to jail fairly soon. To make matters worse the ex had another son 6 months ago, 10 days before my daughter was born. and is now claiming it is my husbands. SO all I can say IS LEAVE HIM. It will never end. You will be alot more happier without him. ' YOU DONT WANT DRAMA WITH HIS BABIES MAMA'.
440110
I think whoever got her pregnant would be in more trouble, dependant on their age. If the guy is over 18, then that could be classed as statutory rape. As far as being expelled from school, i dont think they can do that under grounds of discrimination, however, it all depends on school policy. If she is already showing and hasnt been expelled yet, chances are that they are not going to.
1143354
She isn't pregnant. That is just speculation. They always assume if there is a little bump that someone is pregnant and half of the time that's not the case.
58578
She needs to wait. The Pregnancy Act of 1976 prohibits discrimination against pregnant women, but it's better to get the promotion/raise first. Then the boss can't do anything to her. It would be too obvious.
17017
well let me tell you, I have been through my share of crap concerning things similar and I also used to type up birth certificates in a maternity ward. If at the time of birth the mother was married to this guy she's married to now, the child would have to have his name even he was not the father, that's the law! and also you are not legally responsible for anything right now unless ordered by a judge. the person whose name is on the birth certificate is responsible and you all are gonna end in court over this, trust me....
686415
unmarried girl has equal property share in ancestral property. married woman inheits from her parents but can not ,make not make a claim in joint famili property in ancient Hindu law. Her share in property was given to her in form of dowry at the time of her marriage.\n\nHindu woman has full right to her property inherited from her maiden family. As well as the gifts and jewellery given to her at the time of her marriage are her Stri dhan. If her husband takes it or any part of it in need he is supposed to return the same with interest.\n\nBut off course it was money. Many people made dowry a symbol of status. The woman getting a large share was look with more respect or you can say was more independent and confident. often brides with no money were supposed as contributing nothing to family and had to work harder in joint families. It became a power struggle. \n\nAnother thing which made it worse was greed. Everybody like quick money and easiest way is to get a rich spouse. So there are too many cases where the system was totally abused ad women were forced to bring dowry. And many people paid more than the share of daughter so that her marriage life becomes smoother. \n\nIt was a good system to help newly weds to start a new life and empower the bride on her own a bit. It was her fall back money she had total rights over. But got much abused by greedy people. \n\nIt is agaist law today, and if reported every single person who attends the ceremony where dowry transaction is made can be arrested for supporting it. Instead now married women can claim inheritence in joint family property. Though I doubt if this system will make situation any better. greedy people always find a way. Dowry system is still not dead and bride is given many things as wedding gift. After getting a huge chunk if she or her husband or both still greedy now they can sue the parents for more. It has further made trhe situation worse.
710012
i am Muslim. and in Islam if anybody has a baby without being married is called 'adultery' and all his or her family will be angry with him and the other family will not let their daughters to get married from him so the solution is tell his family( i now they will be angry)and married her
392645
First, you kind of missed some parts of the verse:\nAnd secondly, I am not sure where you got your translations, but it is not giving out the full tranalation.\n\nYusufali 2:228] Divorced women shall wait concerning themselves for three monthly periods. Nor is it lawful for them to hide what Allah Hath created in their wombs, if they have faith in Allah and the Last Day. And their husbands have the better right to take them back in that period, if they wish for reconciliation. And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them, according to what is equitable; but men have a degree (of advantage) over them. And Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.\n\n\nWhen a woman gets a divorce, she has to wait for like 40 days before she can remarry.\nHowever, if the husband and the wife decide to reconcile, than they are allowed to do it.\n\nThere you go, if you read the right translation, you might understand.\nSO as you can see, how people have already thought that Islam downputs women through their wrong translation,...... but when you give them the right translation, than they dont have a word to say....... Read the verse......
454549
Might help to first find out if the Justice of the Peace is single!   No, really, all you should have to do is contact them, at the City hall, and ask them.  There will be a small fee.
944119
There is a whole surah named Women\n\n\nThe quran talks about women and breastfeeding for two years\n\nIt mentions the same amount of rewards and punishments for both men and women\n\nIt says that women get to keep what they earn\n\nWomen have a right to their own in heritance\n\nthe right to divorce\n\nIslam gives women the right to run for political office\n\nThe right to be supported by her husband\n\nThe right to get Dowery \n\nThe right to write her own marriage contract\n\nThe right to select her husband of choosing\n\nThe right ot to pray if she has her period or is sick\n\nThe right to keep whatever she earns from work, inheritance or otherwise\n\nThe right over her children\n\nThe right to vote for officers running for goverment\n\nThe  right to attain the same education as men\n\nthe right to be treated with dignity and kindness by her husband and all members of her family\n\nShould I go on sweethert?\n\nWe could be here all night....
1138963
Under the common law of England, an unmarried woman could own property, make a contract, or sue and be sued. But a married woman, defined as being one with her husband, gave up her name, and virtually all her property came under her husband's control.\n\nIs this what you're asking about?