Looks like Bush mishandled a number of things.?
90325
I believe that Bush has done and continues to do more damage to this country than any other president in the history of the United States.  He managed to turn unprecedented international support into unprecedented international disdain.  He has invaded a sovereign nation for no apparent reason, overextending the military and diverting resources form the legitimate military campaign (the one aimed at actually finding the people who attacked us).  He sent military forces into Iraq with no viable exit plan (which was obvious to many of us from the start and has since become obvious to most).  He has turned an record fiscal surplus into a record fiscal deficit.  He has trampled, and continues to trample, on the bill of rights.  He has forced congress to approve the appointments of radically conservative judges, who will continue to errode our civil rights for years to come.  He has spent billions of dollars on an unnecessary war while schools accross the country are discontinuing art, PE, music, even science and history classes due to lack of funding; entire schools are closing resulting in larger class sizes; special ed programs are being closing.\n\nOK guys, I don't think the asker meant he *literally* wanted to replace Bush with Nixon, but rather that Nixon did less damage as president than Bush is doing.  I expect he knows he's dead...  Although, I must agree that a dead Nixon would be better than Bush in that at least he couldn't actively harm or nation.  For that matter a grapefruit would make a better president than Bush.\n\n_____________\n>>>Do any of you liberals have an original thought in your head \n>>>that DIDN'T come from moveon.org or Micheal Moore?\n\nFrom what I can tell the ONLY thoughts in your head are "Bush good" and "liberals bad."  My political opinions are based on my personal morals, my own observations, and my interpretation of what I read in the news.  Yours appear to be based on a misguided believe that anyone who did not vote for Bush is a terrorist.  Perhaps there is a reason you feel the need to attack anyone who questions your idiomatic ideology?\n\n___________\n>>>There was a very good reason - Iraq lost a war in 1991 and \n>>>didn't submit to UN inspections for WMD. Even Clinton was \n>>>ready to invade in 1998, where was your outrage then?\n\nYou may note that Clinton did NOT invade in 1998.  If he had, I probably would have been outraged, although as he DIDN'T I can't comment on the exact circumstances that would have surrounded this decision.  You may also note that old Bush chose to withdraw from Iraq rather than overthrow Saddam.  Again, there's a reason.  Besides which, failing to submit to UN inspections may or may not be cause for UN action, but it is not a justification for unilateral US action.  Even Bush has stopped talking about UN inspections and WMDs.\n\nAlso note that this is only ONE of the many atrocious policy decisions for which Bush is responsible.  Apparently you can find no argument with the rest of them.\n\n____________\n>>>No you wouldn't have\n\nYou have no basis on which to determine what I would and would not do.  I would not and do not support the unprovoked invasion of a sovereign nation no matter who happens to be president.  And the fact remains that CLINTON DIDN'T DO IT.\n\n>>>AND SEVERAL OTHER NATIONS\n\nOh, sorry, I forgot Poland.  Seriously, though, we had the UK on our side, and a couple of tiny countries who are dependent upon our financial support, but that's about it.  It was unilateral primarily in that we did not consult with other nations in making the decision to invade, not in that there weren't a handful of other countries fighting along side us.\n\n>>>Don't give me the tired WMD crap either - you know DAMN \n>>>well he had them, just ask the Kurds, "Where are they now?"\n>>>would be
1164374
Well he's a bit careless with the truth.
171022
I don't believe anything that moron says. Best way to tell if Bush is lying is if his lips are moving.
874406
He's obviously not too bright if he couldn't forsee the disaster in his words before he spoke them. At the very least, he should have recognized their "double meaning". Although I think it is more than a stretch to imply his words were intended ONLY FOR THE PRESIDENT!?!?!\n\nAnyone in his position for as long as he has been in politics... There is no excuse for an error of this magnitude especially on the eve of elections. \n\nI can't help but think now and again that there is something else going on here, more to it. Regardless, I can't stand the man.
543441
i think that bush only understands about a third of what he says. he's a puppet of dick cheney and karl rove. i think that we've screwed up the middle east enough already. i'm really hoping we can delay things in iran until someone brighter joins his cabinet, or is newly elected.
550797
#1 This is as high as he deserves! I'ts not just him. It's the rest of his "buddie's" to. It took more than one man to get the U.S.A. in this shamful state. All of them let there mouth overload there butt's. The next presidental election is going to be "one for the book's". Make sure you VOTE,this time!!
855297
sounds like hogwash to me.  He got elected, didn't he?
731585
Maybe he was lying on purpose or trying to look stupid.  There may be some beyond the scenes bargaining going on or some hidden agenda...I find it strange they didn't rig it in their favor knowing they know how and that it is pretty easy..
893359
Isn't that pretty clear? George Bush and his lying cronies! Bush is the Commander in Chief! I guess he didn't learn much while he was AWOL from the National guard!
556403
Bush doesn't even know what the word IS means\n\nso there is no way that he is multiplicty in one
260598
Actually Im mixed on the issue. Im more conservative on things, but he didnt really say anything too out there. On the other hand, if he was completely unbiased, hed have said things in favor of the current administation and it appears hes only throwing out anti bush, anti american sentiment. Id have to hear more of his lectures to know.
323318
I think he is in deep, deep trouble over this one.  His answers on the News tonight left a lot to be desired......\n\n(I bet the Americans have not got a clue what we are on about.  Also, very nice to see correct spelling and grammar).
508644
Bush was elected because we have a corrupt goverment and also because his brother is the gov. of Flordia (the state where all the confusion took place and thus turned the tide in his direction)  Yes, I think in his spare time he wears a TARD helmet and drools.  He probably rides a short bus to his functions and frequently wets himself.  Pray this next 2 years go fast.  Also, next time remember to vote Democratic.  What is the current # of soldjers that have been killed????? I think it is over 3,000 lives ended now.  And not 1 WMD found.  What a RETARD!!!!!!!!!!!!
778853
Actually,  I think you're totally right.  Have you noticed how stressed out the man has looked lately?  He has really aged over the past 2 or 3 years.  He is stuck in an unwinnable war, and he doesn't know how to get out of it.  Now that his party doesn't control congress, he can blame all his troubles on that.  He can ask congress for all kinds of wacky nutjob laws, and when they refuse to pass them, he can say, "Look, everything would be better if congress had passed the Give a Range Rover to Every Iraqi bill, but they rejected it, so you can't blame me!"
792104
He was lying, he admitted as much himself, end of story. What, are they going to say he was lying about lying, so that at least he told the truth twice? (LOL) Now, let's hope his previous statement (about Rummy staying until the end of his presidency) proves to be prophetic, and we can get rid of Bush, as well.
286248
You bet, along with the rest of his incompetent cronies. Especially that dead eye Dick C.\n\nZapco600 wake up!\n\nSloppy joe, maybe it's your face thats sloppy from rocking bush.
649529
EVERYTHING BUSH DOES IS WRONG!!!!