Can you give another name to Jesus?
81570
Yeshua HaNazarite BenYoseph HaMashiach\n\nIsaiah 9:6\nFor unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
1031855
Yes Jesus Pronounced HEyZEUs.  He was a spanish friend of mine.  i saw the whole thing!
258443
He would be himself JESUS
734360
No it is not possible.\n\nThomas doubted too.  Did Jesus rebuke Thomas when he called Him God?  Nosiree.\n\nJohn 20:27-29\n Then He said to Thomas, "Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing."   And Thomas answered and said to Him, "My Lord and my God!"  Jesus said to him, "Thomas,  because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."
675628
you might have the next messiah
788149
Yes I do wonder.. I wonder what you are trying to say.  I know the Watchtower uses Ps 83:18 to say we have to use the name Jehovah when talking about GOD as if GOD is too dumb to know who we are referring to.   In reality, they even admit that Jehovah was not GOD's name but since they had millions of things printed before realizing that, they had to stick with it.  Yahweh is far more accurant but in reality GOD has many names but the name HE is most accurately know by is I AM.  This is the same name JESUS used for Himself in John 8:24   \n\nMore important, GOD wants a relationship with us far more then a formal agreement.  My kids knew I was their dad long before they knew my NAME!
12850
Christ is not a last name--it is an honorary epithet meaning "the anointed one" in Greek (Christos). The New Testament was written in Greek, and the Gospel writers used this term to indicate that Jesus was the Messiah.
1060567
The gospel accounts sometimes use the disciples name, and sometimes use their surname (or appellation).\n\nBelow is a list of the 12 disciples, with their Name listed first, then their surname/appellate name:\n\n   1. Simon//Peter or cephas\n   2. James (the elder) // --none--\n   3. John (the beloved disciple) // --none-- (although BOTH James and John we also called "sons of thunder" or "Boanerges")\n   4. Andrew (brother of simon) // --none--\n   5. Philip // --none--\n   6. Nathanael // Bartholomew\n   7. Thomas // Didymous\n   8. Matthew // Levi\n   9. James (the younger, the less) // --none--\n  10. Jude // Thaddeus\n  11. Simon // The Zealot\n  12. Judas // Iscariot
554176
It's not exactly wrong to call the Almighty by the impersonal "God", just as it's not wrong to call one's offspring "Child". If we want a familiar and close relationship, however, it makes sense to use the personal name of someone we love. In English, God's name is “Jehovah”  and his Son's name is “Jesus”.\n\nThe Hebrew name “Yahweh” (or “Yehowah”) expresses the divine name perhaps more accurately with its original Hebrew pronunciation. But just as the Hebrew name “Yeshua” (or “Yehoshua”) is translated into “Jesus” in English, the Hebrew name “Yahweh” is translated into “Jehovah” in English. \n\nSome argumentative persons will argue that the Hebrew name “Yahweh” must only be translated into English as “I am what I am”. Yet such troublemakers fail to explain why they do not translate the Hebrew name “Yeshua” into English as “Jehovah is Salvation” or “I am what I am is Salvation”, which of course their small-minded literalism must surely require with regard to the name we know as “Jesus”.\n\nThe important thing is to use God’s personal name in whatever language you speak, rather than insisting upon the impersonal! Even the Hebrew name “Yahweh” is certainly preferable to the non-name “God”, and the name “Yeshua” is certainly preferable to the non-name “Son”\n\nPs 83:18 That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, You alone are the Most High over all the earth
525822
Nowhere at all.  In fact, even in the earliest Greek manuscripts of the NT, the word Jesus doesn't exist. In fact in the 1611 Authorized Version the word Jesus doesn't exist. Mostly because the letter J didn't exist yet.  It was the King Iames version back then (isn't Iames a dog food?)\n\nThe Hebrew manuscripts of Matthew indicate that his name was Yeshua.  This is also the name that appears on the Oshuary of James (actually "Yaakov"). The name Yeshua means "Salvation" in Hebrew and exists a number of places. For example, the song that Moses sang after crossing the Red Sea: "The LORD my God is my strength and my song, He also has become my Yeshua". Do some research on the many places that this word is used, you will find it quite interesting.
600542
The proper form of baptism is in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as Jesus designated in Matt. 28:19, "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit."  The clear command of Jesus is to baptize this way.  But, if that is so, then why do we see so many instances in the New Testament where people were baptized "in Jesus' name"? \n\nThe reason they were baptizing "in the name of Jesus" is not because it was a formula, but because the phrase, "in the name of" means "in the authority of.  We can see proof of this in Acts 4:7-10,\n\n"And when they had placed them in the center, they began to inquire, 'By what power, or in what name, have you done this?' 8 Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, 'Rulers and elders of the people, 9 if we are on trial today for a benefit done to a sick man, as to how this man has been made well, 10 let it be known to all of you, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead—by this name this man stands here before you in good health.'"\n\n     The Jews asked "by what power, or in what name, have you done this?"  Peter answers and says that it was in the name of Jesus, that they had healed.  In other words, "in the name of Jesus" means that it is by the power and authority found in Christ.\n\nThe only bible that disputes Matthew 28:19 is the New World Translation bible. That Bible was mis-translated and changed by the Jw cult. No bible scholar or language expert takes that bible serious.
86368
I'll take a stab at this one - \n\nI think it may be because of the incredible power and glory the name of Jesus has!\n\nThe Bible says that "...at the name of Jesus, every knee will bow, and every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." (Phillipians 2:9-11)\n\nBecause that day has not yet come, our Enemy is doing all he can to stain the name he fears, and influences people to misuse the name of Jesus at every opportunity.
658550
well, following the rules of grammar, you would say "Jesi".\nWhich I think is pretty cool but doesn't sound quite right.\n\nI'ma have to go with Jesuses.
605113
Yes, God has many names. I choose to call him by the one name that sets Him apart from all others...Jesus!
366019
Tradition.  The translation from the original Greek to Latin and then to English came up with "Jesus."  Even the newer translations which go back to the oldest preserved texts still seem to use the name, even when the translators know better.\nHow do expect this to change if you have to tell millions of worshipers that they have been mispronouncing the name for centuries?  They will always come up with some lame excuse to explain their own ignorance about the topic.
189830
No.  Names are just names.  If I name my kid adolph, does that mean he's a bad person?  No, although you might want to stay away from names like hitler.  Jesus is cool though.
461828
I think in the same way that you call your father "daddy" and not "my daddy", we need not be so specific as to say "The God".  However, if your father was John and you called him Michael, that will draw some eyebrows.  Therefore, the name is important yes but he has given us freedom to call him respectfully in the various names that he has given us to call him in the bible.  Jesus even thought us to pray "Our Father in heaven ..."