Why no mathematician younger than 30 y.o. has ever won a Nobel Prize in Mathematics?
79457
There is no Nobel Prize in mathematics. The closest thing is the Fields medal.
652164
This theorem has an amazing number of proofs but this theorem(like many other mathematical concepts) as you said was known way before pythogorean times but only to INDIANS who didnt share it on the global scale!!
391856
To quote from Wikipedia:\n\n"The Fields Medal is a prize awarded to up to four mathematicians not over forty years of age at each International Congress of the International Mathematical Union (therefore once every four years). Founded at the behest of Canadian mathematician John Charles Fields, the medal was first awarded in 1936 and has been regularly awarded since 1950. Its purpose is to give recognition and support to young mathematical researchers who have made important contributions."
22351
Many have tried, yet none have found a formula. As noted on MathWorld,\n\n"Euler commented "Mathematicians have tried in vain to this day to discover some order in the sequence of prime numbers, and we have reason to believe that it is a mystery into which the mind will never penetrate" (Havil 2003, p. 163). In a 1975 lecture, D. Zagier commented "There are two facts about the distribution of prime numbers of which I hope to convince you so overwhelmingly that they will be permanently engraved in your hearts. The first is that, despite their simple definition and role as the building blocks of the natural numbers, the prime numbers grow like weeds among the natural numbers, seeming to obey no other law than that of chance, and nobody can predict where the next one will sprout. The second fact is even more astonishing, for it states just the opposite: that the prime numbers exhibit stunning regularity, that there are laws governing their behavior, and that they obey these laws with almost military precision" (Havil 2003, p. 171)."
1186148
There used to be a lot of them, but with computers these days they are being solved by brute force. Examples include Fermat's Last Theorem and the Four Color problem in topology. You can look those up to see what they are, and you will probably find sites listing other unsolved mathematical puzzles.
1141330
He should be a teenager.... more interested in peers than authority (but still having been brought up well enough to listen to and respect authority), able to reason at an adult level but without the life experience to make good decisions (which is why he's still not given adult responsibility or privileges), and learn advanced abstract skills and knowledge (such as algebra, economics, etc.).\n\nWhy?
527452
SIR elbert einsten because he is the great scietist of history. his theory of relativity is very exellent . when this world lost after some lack year then then this theory help us because in the future scientist go on new world in the space.these all thing posible when einstien theory says\nthat  for example a man  (age=18)who live on earth and one who(age=18) which goes in the universe with the speed of light after 50 years the age of man which who live on earth his age 65 year. and one which goes in the universe with speed of light his age is 35 years. tell me which scientist is genius.
592484
Wow...I am sending this to the Nobel Commitee.....your genius has not been fully explored....Send that guy a grant!!
168738
geniuses always have something unusual about them. einstein couldn't tie his shoes or read or write. it is what makes them imperfect, like all of us are.
9742
Linus Pauling got the Nobel Prize in 1954 for his studies of the nature of chemical bonds in general, and for his application of this new-found understanding to be able to understand the structures of many complex chemicals, including proteins and enzymes.\n\nThe Nobel Committe's short biography of Prof. Pauling is here:\nhttp://nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/1954/pauling-bio.html\n\n(The other answer about Northrop was mistaken; he shared half the 1946 prize with Wendell Stanley for simply preparing enzymes and virus proteins in a pure form- the chemical nature of these enzyme proteins wasn't yet understood.  The other half of that years prize went to James Sumner for discovering that enzymes could be crystallized.  Many years later when X-ray crystallography became availble (also thanks in part to Pauling) this would help further describe enzyme structure, but not back then.)
839244
<<The only positive results have come from adult stem cell research!>>\n\nAre you a Scientist? And why should I believe you and ignore numerous Nobel Laureates?\n\nThink twice, speak once.
261043
hey, a lot of people are really smart...\n\nArthur Conan Doyle wrote "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes" etc... and he was one of the greatest detective before.\n\nAlbert Einstein discovered a lot of theories without using any experiment tools and stuff, so wouldn't anyone think it's neat?\n\nThe Couple Pierre and Marie Curie contributed a lot in the periodic table, so they could be big time geniuses themselves...\n\nBill Gates never graduated, but indeed he made what we're using right now, correct?\n\nwho knows? maybe someone might keep on dominating that role, and hopefully, he/she would be of much use to the whole world...
969538
Disagree.  It solves some problems in evolutionary theory where selective pressures are subtle.  The mathematics are highly refined and led to new insights, but it's application in the real world is limited.
1141362
Probably not\nThey have physics, literature, economics, peace, physiology and medicine and chemistry. Quotation from Wikipedia: There are several possible reasons why Nobel created no Prize for mathematics. Nobel's will speaks of prizes for those inventions or discoveries of greatest practical benefit to mankind, possibly having in mind practical rather than theoretical works.[6] Mathematics was not considered a practical science from which humanity could benefit (a key purpose for the Nobel Foundation).[citation needed]
755289
30-40  never before 25
355573
Fermat claimed he had a proof 300 years ago but he\nnever demonstrated it. Andrew Wiles proved it in 1996\nbut had to use 20th century mathematics. There's an interesting book called Fermat's Enigma dedicated to\nDr. Wiles 7 year quest to prove it. There's also a \ndocumentary which has been aired on PBS which I've\nseen twice and wouldn't miss it if it came out again.
174633
It isn't necessarily the daily use of mathematics which pediatricians require, it is the demanding intellectual challenges and problem solving skills which Medical School and the process of becoming a medical doctor and the act of practicing medicine itself which requires the mental aptitude developed in part by the study of mathematics. \n\nRemember, doctors are scientists first. It is impossible to become a doctor without a strong backgroud in mathematics.