What is composition of bellasol S - 40 used in water treatment. Pl. give us patent for the same ifavailable?
80854
go to the link below and type in bellasol.  It is referenced in 8 patents.  Read thru them.
63545
use sodium hydrolic solution
753594
It is perfectly permissible to write the products as Br2 + Br2.  It is probably easier to work this way.  After you balance the equations, just add the Br2's together to give the final reaction
102955
Ethanol/SD Alcohol 40\nMonoethanolamine (MEA)\nSodium borate decahydrate (borax)\nSodium hydroxide
943865
-tapwater- sucrose, fructose, fibre, micronuromosees,\nacid, natural flavors, salt, other natural flavors, microcepholopodousoes, (usually)\n\n-sea water- sucrose, fructose, glucosefructose syrup,\nacid, natural flavors, salt, other natural flavors\n\n-purified water- salt, natural flavors, some trace ammounts of weevil borings.\n\nhope your report reflects all the hard work you put into it!!
746431
Sodium hydroxide (commonly called lye) is the main ingredient of classic solid Drano® Kitchen Crystal Clog Remover.  The product also contain aluminum shavings (metallic Al) to react and cause the liquid inside the drain to heat up (this also bubbles to "stir the liquid" and make it seem like something is going on).\n\nDrano® Build-Up Remover works over a longer time period and contains helpful microorganisms that release enzymes to break down residue.\n\nThe liquid and gel products contain various other chemicals (besides Sodium hydroxide) like Myristamine and Sodium hypochlorite (bleach).\n\nSee the references below:
47023
Sodium Hydroxide (aqueous). It's a solution in water of the compound NaOH.
194667
Soap is a surfactant cleaning compound used for personal or minor cleaning. It usually comes in solid moulded form, termed bars. In somewhat recent years, the use of thick liquid soap has become increasingly widespread, especially from dispensers in public washrooms. Soap is used in conjunction with water for washing and cleaning. The wet soap residue and the dirt or soil are rinsed off with clean water afterwards. In the developed world, synthetic detergents have superseded soap as a laundry aid.\n\nMany soaps are mixtures of sodium or potassium salts of fatty acids which can be derived from oils or fats by reacting them with an alkali (such as sodium or potassium hydroxide) at 80°–100 °C in a process known as saponification. The fats are hydrolyzed by the base, yielding glycerol and crude soap. Historically, the alkali used was potash made from the deliberate burning of vegetation such as bracken, or from wood ashes.\n\nSoap is derived from either oils or fats. Sodium Tallowate, a common ingredient in many soaps, is in fact derived from rendered animal fat. Soap that is made of vegetable oils, such as olive oil, are generally termed castile soap.
114804
No need to break it down to "molecular" other wise, try this: Sodium thiosulphate. Dont just use it coz they all vary in their Ph U know the basisity or acidity they concentrate.
373023
Ultrasonic cleaners might be the best solution.\n\nHere is an excerpt from the source listed below: \n\nAlthough a range of possible alternative products is available today, experience has shown that substitution of TRI is not easy and even not feasible for a number of specific cases, either for technical or economical reasons. For all cases, substitution of TRI needs a thorough evaluation of all process aspects. For this reason we intend to work with the authorities in order to prevent a blanket implementation of forced substitution, and allow sustainable and continued safe use of TRI. \n\nThe alternatives you will probably consider first are the chlorinated solvents perchloroethylene (PER) and methylene chloride (MC). They match closest the technical features of TRI, such as non-flammability, high solvency power, a wide range of material compatibility and excellent drying and recycling properties.\n\nBeside PER and MC, you have probably also heard about other alternatives such as aqueous (water-based) alkaline systems, flammable solvents (e.g. hydrocarbons or modified alcohol based formulations), supercritical CO2 or hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), etc.\n\nIt is impossible to say definitively which technology is best. That depends on your specific application, on what you are cleaning, which materials you want to remove, the cleanliness required, the variability of the parts cleaned, the throughput to be achieved, the cycle times, etc. \n\nFor example, for the cleaning of parts between two water-based manufacturing steps (e.g. galvanising), aqueous systems may be better, since parts are put into water phase again later and no energy-intensive drying step to remove the water is required. \n\nIf you need to have very clean and dry surfaces (for coating or surface hardening, for example) and if you have a variety of different metals or blind holes, narrow distances and very fine orifices or a lot of residual oil to clean, hydrocarbons or aqueous systems may not clean and dry well enough. In these cases, chlorinated solvents will offer most often the best solution as they are compatible with most materials, have a high cleaning power, are easy to dry, don't leave residual films and are easy to recycle with high quality by distillation. In addition, chlorinated solvents are today best suited to be used in modern closed systems with minimal losses. Their ecological performance has very much increased and, when used in well-operated metal cleaning systems, they outperform aqueous cleaning as long as drying is required. This has been shown by a Life Cycle Analysis carried out by Ecobilan. \n\nPER comes closest to TRI in technical performance and is often the first choice candidate as an alternative to TRI. However, it shows clear inherent technical differences, which need to be taken into consideration. On one side, PER offers a lower volatility and therefore is advantageous to minimise emissions in closed equipment. On the other side, PER has a lower solvency power and is therefore normally used at a higher cleaning temperature to achieve similar performance. This may raise concerns regarding the compatibility with specific metal working fluids and temperature-sensitive parts. \n\nMethylene chloride (MC) shows excellent cleaning properties already at low temperatures, favouring the cleaning of temperature sensitive parts. However, its high volatility makes emission control more difficult and requires special equipment.\n\nHydrofluorocarbons (HFC) and hydrofluorocarbon ethers (HFCE) are very expensive and show very limited solvency power. A thorough evaluation of the global warming potential is also required to choose the adequate product.
955072
anti-septic solutions use halogenated phenols \nhalogenated phenols are less reactive than general phenols
369798
POLYMERIC BIGUANIDE  TREATMENT\nOriginally developed as a pre surgery anti microbial scrub, PHMB was patented in 1977, and marketed for pools and spas under the trade name Baquacil. This technology has the distinction and the EPA approval as the only non halogen sanitizer available for pools and spas. Here's a page if you're looking here to find out how to convert back to chlorine or some other sanitizer.\nNow that the patent has expired, Bio Lab has also introduced a line of biguanide products under the name Soft Swim. A full system for complete halogen free water care, these products are a stand alone alternative to traditional sanitation methods. The Biguanide itself is combined with algaecides and hydrogen peroxide for periodic oxidation. The system tends to gum up filters, and of course a product is available to de-gum it. Biguanide are not recommended for spas or aerated pools. As long as you don't add any other chemicals but those recommended by the manufacturer, you'll do fine; but add a small amount of chlorine and your pool looks like orange sherbet! Biguanides are also incompatible with TSP, ozone, detergents, ionizers, and other common chemicals, but is not at odds with any water balancing chemicals you may add.\nBiguanides have been reported to be easier to use, with less chemical level testing, and less adding of chemicals. The water doesn't smell of chlorine of course, and the reduced surface tension gives it a smoother feel. It doesn't degrade with sunlight, temperature or changes in pH levels like chlorine. At recommended concentrations, biguanides won't irritate the skin or eyes and can't corrode pool equipment. \n \nhttp://www.poolcenter.com/biguan.htm\n------------------------------------------------------------
423322
It is prepared by sulphation of 1-dodecanol (lauryl alcohol, CH3(CH2)10CH2OH) followed by neutralisation with sodium carbonate.\n\nIt is an ionic surfactant that is used in household products such as toothpastes, shampoos, shaving foams and bubble baths for its thickening effect and its ability to create a lather.
794305
sodium lauryl sulfate
337907
Citric acid and products like Biocid have been used.\n\nhttp://www.ultra-chemical.com/index2.htm
541365
http://xrint.com/patents/us/4396390\n\nAlso contact www.cottoninc.com
947119
This is similar to "how long is a piece of string?". \n\nEthanol will not react with bromine water, but will mix perfectly with it.