Do you think that if Cheney were a Democrat they would not have waited 24 hrs to release info on the shooting?
88172
I disagree with my sis...I don't think they would have waited..
359491
She made a stupid move and should be punished appropriately.  BUT should this really by Fox News' only story of the day?  Um' no.  It's about as sensational and ultimately worthless as Cheney shooting a man in the face.  It's a little disturbing silly that Tom Delay near the brink of jail time for  money laundering and conspiracy is slinging mud at her.
309577
Cheney didn't shoot a senator.  He ACCIDENTALLY shot a lawyer friend of his.  I swear, some folks need to get their heads out of their rectal canal...\n\n\nYou edited your post, subcultural, but your head is STILL up your butt.
574923
Kerry would have been in office for over a year, so we probably wouldn't be waiting for the next attack. \n\nWe'd be talking about why it happened, and wondering if it would have happened if Bush had been reelected.
849234
For one day it would take the Military to decide he was too dangerous to continue.  Otherwise, it takes impeachment from Congress, which would take time.  Vets are organizing to do that.
340757
Of course they should be concerned about Cheney's hunting accident. \n\nThe fact that Harry Wittington stood up and apologized to the Vice President and his family - caked with makeup - was a real special moment for Cheney. Chaney said that the day of the accident was the Worst Day Of His Life.\n\nI guess the day he lied about the reasons for going to war in Iraq was the second worst day. \n\nThis Administration is a complete train wreck. No need to get into it all - as we all know what it's about anyway. \n\nO I L !!! \n\nCheney does need to find himself a new hunting guide - and quick!\n\nAs they say, "The Buck(shot) Stops Here!"
681321
yeah, i asked how come the pres hasn't been assasinated yet. they got to me!  they said it incited violence and hatred. i was simply asking why it hadn't happened yet, not advocating it. i failed to mention that if he DID happen to get shock-n-awed, i'd uncork 10 bottles of frikkin champagne, but you never heard me say that!
694534
because the president didnt listen to the people that are telling him that this is a losing battle yesterday on the abc, cbs, and nbc news, a story appeared about how bush was told, by his own hand picked generals, that the war is going badly, and he immeditaly went in to a prees conference and said the exact oppisit. bush is a perenial liar he should be shot. republicans have no one else to blame for this fiasco but themselves
698831
No, Dick Cheney got in serious trouble this year for leaking the name of a CIA agent. So basically the answer is; if the vice president can't get away with it than nobody else can.
132168
One way to look at it is to contrast something Bush did about 6 years ago. He was hunting with Karen Hughes (no he didn't pepper her with bird shot, unfortunately) and they killed some protected species od dear.\n\nThe first thing they did was go out and tell people, apologize and then thats the end of that.\n\nCheney didn't do that, nor would he talk to the Sheriff until the next day. They were drinking there, and Cheney is on various heart medications (although all the details are hidden too) which don't mix with alcohol.\n\nSo was he impared? Probably not, but we'll never know now.
1163808
I thought it was longer than a week but I did like that a$$hole video.That has got to be the best yet. Man there are a lot of them eh ! When will the Republicans wake up and come to Democrats is what I say to this question.
775816
Interesting thing about this is, I have been criticizing the media about this since Carter and the hostage crisis.\n\nThis is not a new problem.  \n\nI would rather be kept in the dark if it keeps our enemies in the dark.\n\nNot the same as wanting a plan from the democrats regarding their intentions.
1052607
their still waiting for john murtha and nancy pelosi to tell them what to say....\n\n\nbaaaaaaaaa........
1073198
Reporting on what has already happened is ok. That is news reporting. Problem is they like to broadcast in advance leaked planns for attack. "Sources in the pentagon say that the AirForce is planning an air strike between midnight and 6 am. They want to try and catch Osama by surprise" Is there any question why we can't find the son of a bitch when reports like this make it to the 6 o'clock news the day before the attack is supposed to happen. Do you think perhaps Osama might have someone with a satalite dish, Fox news channel, and a cell phone???
160659
I was going to say that Traitor may be too strong of a word for this however, after thinking about it Ive changed my mind.  As a former Vice President one would hope he would have had a little more respect for America, the administration and our armed services.  In times of war the last thing we need is a former VP giving the enemy ammo to use against us or fanning the fire.  This could lead to added hostility and attacks on US troops.  If that is the case we have Al Gore to blame.
567510
The truth is... nobody knows... because the wiretaps don't need any oversight... and that's the scariest idea in the world...\n\nthey could listen to every potential democratic congressman and nominee 24-hours a day and we would never know\n\nIf you want to trust Bush go ahead, but I wonder where the "WMD" are?
1059101
jmeege,\n\nIt is easy to ask and wait for an answer that no one here has.  It would be the same if we elected a Democratic president in '08 and asked you the same question.\n\nWant to know why?  It's called strategic.\nYou don't publish what your plan is step-by-step.  That would be like playing Chess and telling your opponent what your next 5 moves are going to be (after every move!).  A Democratic president wouldn't have much to say either, nor would the entire Democratic party.  It would be the same strategy - don't publish it.  \n\nNow they might set a deadline, and that would be unfortunate.  Could you imagine if during the Battle of the Buldge in WWII, we had reporters on the battlefield reporting the high number of casualties, causing immediate alarm here in the U.S. ?  What if, as a result, Congress ended the declaration of war and pulled our troops out?  You could not even begin to fathom the significance that mistake would have cost us.  It's possible the war might not have ever turned in the Allies' favor.\n\n\nThose that don't understand war strategy, are usually the ones with very little knowledge of history.  It is wrong to assume that a WAR should be over within a specific amount of time.  It is also wrong to take a premature position and say that this war is meaningless.  Even in our lifetime, it is likely that we will never truly know how significant the impact of winning this war will have.\n\n\nFurthermore, it is foolish to assume you are in a better position by asking a question you don't have a solution to.