how many solders die in vietnam during the war?
89300
58202 U.S. deaths, see website for other nationalities.
441088
There were 765 POWs released and 36 escaped.  For a detailed breakdown, visit the Vietnam POW homepage below.  Go to the POW statistics section for the numbers.
161189
American Deaths:\n\n~10000 died in camp of starvation, exposure, or disease\n\n~8500 died in British Prisons\n\n~7200 died in Battle\n\n~8200 wounded\n\nBritish deaths:\n\n~10000 died through whole war\n\nHessian deaths:\n\n~7500 died through whole war
727126
Vietnam war was a resource war. We wanted to control the tin, rubber, manganese , the still undeveloped off-shore oil and the largest rice growing region (Mekong Delta) in the world. We poisoned the Delta before we left with Agent Orange and today there are so many deformed births that they are just quietly put down. Vietnam war was a whore just like Iraq.
494362
don't forget about the Vietnamese and Cambodian deaths? How much was it? 2 million? 3 million?
553881
It was the Vietnam War.  Millions of gallons were used.  A whole lot.  Look it up on Wikipedia or do a google search.
657748
Most Americans dont have common sense when it comes to comparing death.  There are many instances like that.  For Example, statistically Marine Corps BootCamp is the absolute safest place for a person to be, yet the media and the people BLOW UP when someone dies there.  STOP COMPARING IRAQ TO NAM! They are nothing alike. Vietnam involved real fighting! Iraq war deaths are mostly IEDs and cowardly tactics like that!
887210
51,983 — Americans died in the Pacific\nhttp://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/peaceinthepacific/numbers
681754
Im not sure if the term originated in WWII or  from the Vietnam war. \nBut I know it originated cause solders married local women and brought them to the US after the war.
739423
Chinese killed 145,000\nChinese wounded 260,000\nSoviets killed 315
13605
About 55,000, whose names are on the VietNam memorial wall in Washington, D.C., where many American VietNam veterans and family go to mourn their friends, fathers, etc. Many many more made it home, but have had serious physical, mental, and financial problems, partly due to Americans non-support for the war (which fortunately changed over the years, at least for the vets), as well as the unescapable fact that War is Hell on earth, regardless, and that was one of the worst.
508001
58,226 were killed in action or classified as missing in action
834786
Vietnam-a complicated war. As a matter of fact, it wasn't called a war for years-it was a "police action" or "conflict". Not a lot of clear answers there.\n\nU.S. military advisors first became involved in Vietnam as early as 1950, when they began to assist French colonial forces. In 1956, these advisors assumed full responsibility for training the Army of the Republic of Vietnam or ARVN. Large numbers of American combat troops began to arrive in 1965 and the last left the country in 1973.\n\nPresidents involved were:\nHarry Truman 1945-1953\nDwight Eisenhower 1953-1961\nJohn Kennedy 1961-1963\nLyndon Johnson 1963-1969\nRichard Nixon 1969-1974\n\n American forces rose from 16,000 during 1964 to more than 553,000 by 1969. (Johnson). The irony here is we couldn't win that guerrilla war with 553,000  troops but thought 100,000 in Iraq would be plenty. Robert McNamara(then Secretary of defense) has since said he believed JFK would have ended the war has he not been assassinated in 1963.  I believe Democrats were a bit fooled by Johnson in that he fought strongly for great civil rights laws(he did do a lot there) back then but on the other hand escalated the war. It was easy for Democrats to believe he was a good man fighting the good fight. \n\n \n\nNixon had continuously campaigned under the slogan that he "had a plan to end the Vietnam War." (Peace With Honor)Unfortunately, no such plan existed and the American commitment would continue for another five years. The goal of the American military effort was now to buy time, gradually build up the strength of the South Vietnamese armed forces, and to re-equip them with modern weapons so that they could defend their nation on their own. This policy became the cornerstone of the so-called "Nixon Doctrine"\n\nSo Nixon finally pulled troops out but dragged his feet for years.Since he was elected largely because he promised to get us out of Vietnam, people were unhappy it took so long. I believe he finally did withdraw to get re-elected. He was re-elected for a 2nd term but resigned because of Watergate. (Watergate was unraveling during the campaign but most people didn't believe he was involved-thought instead it was a left-wing conspiracy). His Vice-President became President and pardoned Nixon soon after. \n\nIt was a tumultous time indeed. Robert Kennedy was assassinated in 1968 during his Primary run for President.\nThere was a lot of talk that he would certainly be President but \nRichard Nixon was instead. \n\nThere was a lot more to all of this and I'd encourage you to research more-a fascinating time, although very sad. History, politics and life seems interchangeable.
608237
In humans, as of 19th April: 196 cases, 110 deaths\nOutbreaks in bird populations: well in the thousands-vietnam has at least 2000 known outbreaks.\n\ncheck out http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/world/2005/bird_flu/default.stm\n\nVery good website with accurate detail.
721563
Yes it played a major role into the failures of the Vietnam War.  Limited War provides a safe haven for the enemy, where they can regroup and launch additional attacks.
1072161
I see that you have posted another question you really don't want an answer to. Stop telling us what we already know. People die in wars. Here are some numbers for you:\n\nTop ten wars with the most US military fatalities: as of 2003\n\n10: Gulf War: 148\n9:   Spanish/American war of 1898: 385\n8:   Mexican war of 1846: 1733\n7:   War of 1812: 2,260\n6:   Revolutionary War: 4,435\n5:   Korean War:  33,651\n4:   World War l:  53,513\n3:   Vietnam:  58,193\n2:   Civil War:  140,414 (Union only: Confederates recorded at 74,000 est)\n\nNUMBER ONE:  World War ll:  292,131\n\nThe greatest civilian losses in all world history are from World War ll: Across the globe, a shocking tally of: 25,568,400.\n\n42,747 Civilian deaths are reported at http://iraqbodycount.net/ and that doesn't compare to the lowest civilian body count of WWll which was 300,000 suffered in Hungary.\n\nCurrent death toll of our service men totals in at 2500 estimate, with changes daily. That currently puts Iraq in at #7 on the top ten.\n\nI don't want to see this war climb to number 6 any more than any one else. Beyond that, what I am trying to say, is that what you are saying has been known for centuries (speaking of the fact that people die in wars) so you aren't presenting anything new and in fact you are just ranting. Yet, I will answer you question by saying this. ONE death from this war, was too many. That is the reality of war. It is hell and good people die. I wish it weren't happening, but there it is. Support our troops, and welcome them home when they come!
794987
It was just like the Vietnam war years ago, except there wasn't a rapid change to show the horrors of war as much.  The war coverage was always sort of propaganda filled in that it would show the death tolls and then immediately indicate that "progress" was being made.  Frankly, I feel like we have no connection to the wars that are being fought.  How much do you or I really know?