Is it valid a contract written in spanish language in Florida, usa?
95869
Contracts that are legally binding by law are valid regardless of what language they are written in. There are other requirements for a contract to be binding (i.e., both parties must have consented, and have the ability to consent under the law) yet language doesn't affect the binding nature of valid contracts legally entered into by both parties.  Yet for them to be submitted to a court that would require that the contract meet any guidelines established by the Courts in the jurisdiction. This may be that they be in English. If that's the case they would have to be translated, and most the translation will have to be notarized.
785740
Just type in Yahoo or Google search bar "Joint Tenancy Agreement"\nIf you mean a deed make sure to type the word "deed" in too. Then you'll need to check your state's statutory provision for any special language mandated by your state to be on the deed.\nBuena Suerte
256565
Many companies like people who can speak both Spanish and English. You could make fliers saying, "Hola! Mi nombre es..." and translate it into English.
578911
There are many language spoken in Florida:\n\nEnglish\nSpanish\nCreole\nFrench\n\nAnd I'm sure there are many more
584428
Spanish for work in the US\n\nJapanese for international work (this is the best language for business communication)\n\nSign Language if you want to be a rare asset in the workforce... interpreters and hearing signers are very highly paid and appreciated!
302350
In Latin America we have different ways to do it, but in Mexico we usually say "Bueno" (good) or "¿Diga?" (Talk?)... it also depends on your situation, if you are working then you'll answer "Gracias por llamar a xxxx" (Thanks for calling to xxxx)... it also changes from country to country, in some places they say "Aló" or "Hola"
1151030
Hi!\n\nIn general, contracts are 100% binding if the parties signing the contract are legally able to do so (ie: they're not impaired) and if the subject matter of the contract is not illegal.  (This is a VERY watered down overview.)\n\nThis means, however, if you have agreed to non-compete or non-solicitation language in your contract, courts are very reluctant to step into the agreement and try to figure out the intention of the parties.  As a result, language like this, while potentially harmful, is valid language.\n\nOn the non-compete side of things, though, there has also been a general reluctance to stop a person from doing the work that is their livelihood.  In otherwords, if you are a carpenter and you sign non-compete language, you will probably still be able to work as a carpenter even if this means breaking the agreement.  The test usually used is whether not performing whatever it is that you said you wouldn't perform will result in substantial harm to you.  In other words, the courts are willing to invalidate this specific language because you not working would actually potentially result in a burden on society... which outweighs the possible benefit the other party has in you not working.\n\nNon-solicitation language, on the other hand, is more flexible.  Language such as this is usually between two businesses and merely says that you will refrain from hiring employees away from the other party... and that they will refrain from hiring your employees away from you.  A good contracts person, however, will limit this language to say that this does not extend to an individual from Company A actively responding to open job postings from Company B... but will prevent Company B from directly asking that Company A employee to apply.\n\nSo, the quick answer is that non-competes are generally not favorably viewed, as they are damaging to the interests of the public, however, non-solicitation language is usually ok.\n\nGood luck!
186198
Here in Argentina, a TV hostess coined an expression (not just a word) out of perfectly Spanish words, in her show. So, in order to prevent this expression from being used in other shows, she copyrighted her expression.\n\nThere must be an office for that, but I guess that the proceedings must be very expensive.
820089
Only if you are going to use it and keep using it as long as you have a contract.\n\nOtherwise, enjoy.
61507
No.  There are no treaties that ask for annuities be paid to hispanics.
99113
In the US, this agreement is usually nothing more than a contract.  So, there should be no reason to have it notarized.
406523
In Texas we use oficial de probatoria, but the right translation is oficial de libertad condicional
18358
As usual with legal-related questions on Yahoo! answers, too little information has been provided to answer the question adequately.  If the verbal agreement was informal, made between friends or family members, or made in an otherwise unprofessional environment, it is likely uneforceable.  The state of residence, which was not provided, matters, as does the nature of the episode, and whether any consideration was offered in return.  Additionally, the statute of frauds may be implicated, which would REQUIRE a contract in writing before it can be enforceable, which is again unclear from the facts.  You should consult a lawyer with the specific facts from your case, or you should post a new question with explicit and careful detail.  I hope at least this much is helpful.
944817
Hi Melinda...according to Microsoft's Support info you can do this by installing International Proofing Tools from the ValuePack that is on the Offix X for Mac: http://www.microsoft.com/mac/resources/resources.aspx?pid=resourcekits&rk=officex&article=/mac/officex/ork/International_Features.xml\n\nIt wasn't specific if Spanish grammar was included.  See section International Proofing Tools.
449014
it probably varies from state to state, but in most places, a signed contract has it's own language reguarding cancelling and voiding; I'd read the contract, then call the dealer.
125661
Yes. \n\nAlthough some only in Spanish on espn desportes.
869869
No.\n\nUS law dictates that any sale of goods or services over $500 has to be in writing.  If I remember my real estate law class from university correctly, it's called the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code). Verbal contracts are non-binding in this case.  \n\nThe written contract takes precident.  And here, most real estate sales contracts are worded so that they can back out anytime they want to.  \n\nI learned this the hard way where the same thing happened to me, where a seller backed out on a verbal contract after promising to sell a house to us.  My wife and I quit our apartment in the Bay Area and were effectively homeless unless we could find a new house.  We ended up tracking them down, begging them to reconsider.  Contacted a lawyers, but as you already know - didn't have a leg to stand on. \n\nIt all worked out in the end.  I didn't go homeless. If you believe in Karma, then what comes around goes around.  Don't get pissed, just know that bad things eventually happen to people who don't live an honest life.