finding law and authority on objections in court for relevance?
96750
Try www.findlaw.com.  It's a free website that MAY give you what you look for.  Good luck!
1133206
There are several sources of law, statutes being one source of law.  Given the limitations of the english language, courts are sometimes called upon to interpret various statutes.  There are rules of statutory construction which  courts utilize in doing so.  The general theory is that courts should construe statutes to be constitutional, if possible. Second, the courts try to determine the intent of the legislature in interpreting the statute.  Courts will look to other court decisions interpreting the same or similar statutes, legislative intent, amendments to a statute, and even dictionaries and other sources.
611765
Usually a motion to suppress evidence is one in which the evidence is highly relevant to the facts at issue (e.g.--gun, drugs, or a defendant's statement) but was obtained in violation of the defendant's constitutional right (e.g.--4th, 5th, 6th Amend.).
212982
Your question is too vague.  I'd suggest you look at a horn book on Contracts - or do a key word search on Westlaw.  Generally, if a judge errs, the remedy is to appeal the matter and see what remedy the appellate court can offer.
496025
It depends on the judge/justice of the peace/magistrate.  Legally, you are entitled to insist that you have a right to confront all witnesses against you and since the only witness who has any firsthand knowledge of what you allegedly did is not available, the case cannot proceed and must be dismissed.  But it is entirely possible that the judge/JOTP/magistrate either (1) doesn't care or (2) doesn't know what that means, and will let the hearing proceed as the judge, prosecutor, chief witness, and fact finder...to which you can object to, and his only response will be argue it on appeal.
85571
Court proceedings differ in each case that is brought before a judge...\nIt is basically the paperwork and story of each case to be presented and any evidence to use...
423250
Michigan Court Rules: \nUnless otherwise specified by these rules, a judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the circuit court or the Recorder's Court for the City of Detroit not subject to appellate review under subchapters 7.200 or 7.300 may be reviewed only in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter.\n\nThe subsection defines different motions that can be filed with the court, and also the right to counsel.\n\nAs for the adequacy of representation, I couldn't find a direct definition. I did find Michgan Court Rule 6.508(D). Rule 6.508(D)(3)(b) (below) talks about an irregularity that prejudices the outcome. That would mean that there is an error, other than a jurisdictional error since those are specficially excluded, that causes the court to make a ruling that it wouldn't make without the error. So, you'd have to show a mistake that changed the outcome of the procedure.\n\nAs the other poster said, these are questions best addressed by a lawyer. If you require help, I'd suggest contacting the Michigan bar or your local public defender or legal aid for assistance.\n\n"(D) Entitlement to Relief. The defendant has the burden of establishing entitlement to the relief requested. The court may not grant relief to the defendant if the motion\n\n(1) seeks relief from a judgment of conviction and sentence that still is subject to challenge on appeal pursuant to subchapter 7.200 or subchapter 7.300;\n\n(2) alleges grounds for relief which were decided against the defendant in a prior appeal or proceeding under this subchapter, unless the defendant establishes that a retroactive change in the law has undermined the prior decision;\n\n(3) alleges grounds for relief, other than jurisdictional defects, which could have been raised on appeal from the conviction and sentence or in a prior motion under this subchapter, unless the defendant demonstrates\n\n(a) good cause for failure to raise such grounds on appeal or in the prior motion, and\n\n(b) actual prejudice from the alleged irregularities that support the claim for relief. As used in this subrule, "actual prejudice" means that,\n\n(i) in a conviction following a trial, but for the alleged error, the defendant would have had a reasonably likely chance of acquittal;\n\n(ii) in a conviction entered on a plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill, or nolo contendere, the defect in the proceedings was such that it renders the plea an involuntary one to a degree that it would be manifestly unjust to allow the conviction to stand;\n\n(iii) in any case, the irregularity was so offensive to the maintenance of a sound judicial process that the conviction should not be allowed to stand \nregardless of its effect on the outcome of the case;\n\n(iv) in the case of a challenge to the sentence, the sentence is invalid."
235686
Go to the following site and use the search button in the top right corner. \n\nhttp://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/index.html
405479
separate case; standards for being awarded a prelim. injunction are different
870743
The following apply to the United States of America,\nFirst, one must remember that the accused is entitled to his/her day in court and to confront the witnesses against him/her. Confront here means question in court, not go toe to toe.\nSecond, there is a principle known as discovery where the accused's attorney gets to see evidence, including statements made against the accused, in order to be able to mount a defense. Now there's the rub, the attorney might be unethical enough to reveal names of witnesses to the accused prior to trial.\nI would suggest speaking with the prosecuting attorney about your concerns.
899469
Try http://www.law.upenn.edu/library/ulc/ulc.htm
143773
Try www.findlaw.com.  It offers online access to cases, codes and practice areas.  It even has subject FAQs that should help find the information that you want, or someone who can provide it on a professional level.
373837
Complaint, Answer, Discovery, Motions, Trial, Judgment, Appeal
138052
To ensure that proper legal procedures are followed and to decide on points of litigative procedure such as admission of evidence, statements, and deciding on the validity of attorneys' objections.
111670
Ask your attorney for copies.
318446
Ask the Clerk of the Court.
908574
New evidence and a good attorney and maybe a higher court.