Can a Tibet Native living in China kill up to one person without prosecution?
88967
I am not so sure about this: the chinese are very lax on minorities. Some minorities can carry knives in public as it is part of their traditional costume. \n\nAbout 90% of the people in China are of the Han race, but there are also a lot of minorities. I have heard of cases whereby minorities have stabbed people and got away with murder. Strange?
93836
This is the result of a long process of sinicization of the world. China has always been regarded as aggressive, therefore, 2/5 of its territory is occupied after the communist regime, break-away taiwan is another proof of the communist regimes stance. Tibet, Xinjiang (East Turkistan) Inner Mongolia are a few among those who are not of yellow races, accordingly, not Han Chinese (ghuo). they are Tibetan buddhists, Turkic Uyghurs or Mongols. Huis are another one represented as a star on the chinese flag. I am afraid political leaders and officials are not well-aware of this policy. They only care for money, capital investments, but not capital punishment, gross human rights abuses committed by the communist regime.
275216
hope this might help:\nhttp://www.buddhanet.net/budwork.htm\n\nby the way, previously in mainland (communist) china, it was a rough place to live in. anything can happen, in order to keep surviving.
392548
I asked a similar question a few weeks ago and really got very little feedback. Chech out my Q&A.\nbut as far as I know it is a peaceful practice, based on meditation and universal peace...which makes the whole question all the more bizarre!!!!\ngoogle for more info.\nThe Chinese government is communist therefor information is tightly restricted!!\nWithin China the Fulon Gong support has grown to outnumber the support offered the Communist party., Thus threatening the strength of the party.\nApparantly the attacks on Fulon Gong members are horrific.\nThere was a report in a recent news paper about Labor?/rehabilitation camps in China, where Fulon Gong and other "Prisoners of Conscience" were being held for short periods of time and then used for the harvesting of organs, for commercial use. The apparant profit of which goes in part to the government.. the called it in the article "factory of spare parts"!!!!! I will try to find the article and send you on details if you areinterested.\nI was sick to my stomach when i read this!\nTrying to find information over the web is very difficult!! the only thing i can suggest is to find local organisations in your area! You will be amazed by what you discover through them.\nThe Boston Information number is (978) 994 4234\nAlso you could join Amnesty international...and even though there is not much info available there either...by posing questions you can show your support for publicising and addressing the situation in China more thoroughly.\nP.s. I am also just an everyday person who having read a very disturbing article tried to follow up on the onfo and see what i could find out.
318080
I do believe violence is not the answer and that it should be a last resort. But the non-violent approach can be as bad as the violence way. Like lawyers they twist and manipulate words and facts, the media and the countries all do the same. In this case, it is screwing everyone over. Like that evidence is not admissible crap. We have a tape showing him murder this person, but we didn't legally obtain it, so not admissible. Total crap, its evidence one way or another. So non-violence can be as bad as violence in that nothing is ever totally fair for humanity. So is killing the person for killing someone else or letting the killer off because of some technicality worse, violence vs. non-violence?
396307
YES..i am tibetan and i grew up believeing that we are still a free nation..China took advantage of Tibet's nonviolence and massacred my people. Tibet would have evolved in its own time. What would have been tibet had China not intervened is unknown, but Tibet should be A FREE COUNTRY. \n\nFree Tibet
83981
yes and kill him even \n\nyou can do so much damage with physical violence and a little fight could land you in jail for life...just don't do it
1055210
No one can force you to kill another human.\nAt this point, those that live by the sword will die by the sword.
547537
If the person actually died, the person could be charged with some level of murder or manslaughter. Otherwise, attempted murder would certainly be possible, especially if there was a lot of evidence that the person wanted the other person dead, or some sort of assault charge or wilfull poisoning. The exact charges would depend on the state, and for any of them to be succesfully prosecuted, the state would have to prove that the person knew that his/her friend was allergic to peanuts, which may not be easy to do.
417769
There is NO way that Tibet will be returned from Chinese Communist control. As long as the Chinese are strong as they are now, Tibete will always remain under their control. The Chinese have also done sometehing else to ensure that Tibet remains Chinese. They have thousands of soldiers in that area and have allowed inter-marriage with the Tibetians. This has happened so much that Tibet is actually Chinese. As a side note. China did the same thing to Sikkim, a little kingdom to the North of India. It is now Chinese. They are trying hard and have been for the past few years to take over NEPAL. Eventually, they will have that under their control also.(Side note: I have been to Nepal twice and it is such a beautiful country high in the Mountains where Mt. Everest is). Also another country to the north of India.. Brutan.. is fast becoming Chinese territory.
890428
You do not have any thing to worry about. Unless you are talking to known terrorist.\n\nBy law if they hear any thing other than terrorist they can do nothing. even if they hear a murder plot they must let it happen. If they do any thing the person that told will go to jail for 15 years.
78682
The principle here is not that they are able to kill people but for what reason. The execution of a known felon who has him/herself murdered countless lives has forfeited his/her right to live under the eyes of the law. If he/she were to be set free and thus cause more deaths on the population it is justified to take his life for the general good. They are against violence, random and senseless violence that is. Sanctioned killings whereby a person has commited crimes deemed irreconcievable in the eyes of the community is not a crime nor hyprocracy but justified and necessary. As for war it depends on the reason, to the defence of life and country it is a noble cause, for an outster of a regime not friendly to a country that is selfcentered hyprocracy for a nation that cherishes life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
820996
`It all depends on who he was trained to kill and who he killed.\n\nMost military personnel are trained kill.  However, it doesn't give him/her the right to kill any one not considered an enemy by their government.
138358
Assuming that the guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined, traditional teaching does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.\n\nIf, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people's safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person. \n\nToday, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm - without definitely taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself - the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity are very rare, if not practically non-existent.
1127822
murdering people is illegal but that dosen't stop people from doing it
881658
yes if he is a bad criminal person.. but no if he is living without doing any harm to people
697305
There is no law or procedure in Singapore that requires the police to handcuff the corpse of an offender. The story you and your friend have heard is an urban legend that has been making its way around Singapore for many years.