Does dark forces are really exixt..?
83381
Do light forces exist? If they do then yes, dark forces exist as well. There has to be a balance. With the day must come the night, with life there must also be death, with good there must be bad, and with light there must be dark as well.
945770
The DarkAlotie..... they are the umbrella group for all the other secret societies on earth. They are of extraterrestrial origin and have been controlling mankind for 6234.5 years.
161557
Dark matter exists in two forms: neutrinos and neutralinos. Neutrinos are what is known as "hot dark matter" (HDM) and neutralinos are "cold dark matter" (CDM). Neutrinos are simply tiny particles with barely any mass that are created when a neutron decays to a proton (beta decay). We know they exist and have detected them. Neutralinos, on the other hand, have not yet been detected. The theory is that they are a form of supersymmetrical particle (or an "evil twin" of a normal particle) that is very heavy, very slow, and requires huge amounts of energy to create - which is why we haven't been able to detect them in particle accelerators yet. Some people say dark matter is just a fudge factor and propose "improved" calculations of gravity to compensate.\n\nDark energy is simply the result of quantum fluctuations. Quantum fluctuations are just waves of gravitational and electromagnetic fields that oscillate over time and cause virtual particle pairs (a particle and an antiparticle) to pop in and out of existence). These fluctuations cause empty space to push outward in all directions, keeping the universe flat and causing it to expand.\n\nIf your still not entirely sure what dark energy is, here's an excerpt from my research paper on dark energy that I am currently working on:\n\n"...the universe is presently in a state of accelerated expansion powered by dark energy, a force that threatens to stretch out everything in the universe until it either freezes or rips apart. Dark energy actually refers to the “vacuum energy” or “zero-point energy” generated by quantum fluctuations (Krauss and Turner, 2004). The fundamental concept of quantum theory is that it forbids intermediate states of energy between fixed quantum values (Barrow, 2001). Just as an electron is forced into a particular atomic orbital (see Figure X), a quantum fluctuation has to have a whole number of wavelengths (n quantum wavelengths, where n is a whole number) (Barrow, 2001). It cannot have half a wavelength or any other fraction and it has to start at zero amplitude and end at zero amplitude (Barrow, 2001). The pressure generated by these fluctuations has been observed in an experiment involving two metal plates positioned exactly parallel to each other in a vacuum (The process is illustrated in Figure XI). Within a region of space that contains the least amount of energy and matter possible, called the vacuum state, quantum fluctuations are present in all possible wavelengths, as seen on the outside of the two metal plates in the figure (Barrow, 2001). When two uncharged metal plates are put into the vacuum, only the quantum wavelengths can be present between the plates (Barrow, 2001). The closer the plates are together, the fewer quantum wavelengths are possible between them (Barrow, 2001). The result is a negative pressure inside the plates that pulls them together, given by the equation\n\nPCASIMIR = ((PI^2)hc/240d^4)A(2)\n\nwhere h is the Planck constant, c is the speed of light,  d is the distance between the plates, A is the area of the plates, and PCASIMIR is the pressure due to what is referred to as the Casimir Effect (Bordag et al., 2001).\n\nThus, dark energy is a simple concept that has a lot of complex problems to solve. As mentioned earlier, it must keep the universe flat and allow its expansion to go from deceleration to acceleration and have negligible interaction with matter (Bauer and Seidl, 2005).\n\nPreliminary attempts to quantify dark energy based on the equation for the fluctuation of quantum fields in the vacuum state, \nu = 2  [(hc |k|)dk]/[2(2PI)^3](3)\n show that such energy would tear apart all matter in the universe (Milton, 2004). Equation (3) indicates that the energy density, u, is proportional to the Planck constant multiplied by the speed of light integrated over a range of quantum fields (represented by the photon wavevector, k, in this example) (Milton, 2004). Eve
574398
Yes, we are all torn between good and evil all the time.\nBut we all have our free will which one to choose.\nTo visit the dark side is very tempting once in awhile but come to think of it, does it really worth it? Every wrong decisions we make is a start of disaster, what you sow is what you reap. If you think a small evil won't do you any harm, you are wrong. Have you seen a ripple in the water? Try to create one small ripple and see what will happen. If you want to be remembered good, then do the good things. Good works, good karma. It's as simple as that.
283958
Both are.. One is a fallen dark angel from dai... Another is a white-winged crusader.. i like dark's jokes... i've seen the manga, it's much better from the anime.. Anyway, if i hae to make a choice, then it will be Dark... haha..
1039389
Its dark in your world, isn't it?  :-)
910081
Greetings my sister. I am Daniker, warrior prince of the Shedi people. The dark forces of Amaya are regrouping for the final conflagration (as foretold in the Second Book of Shymon). Our task, which is of great immediacy, is to muster all our allies to defend the Sacred Light and Truth, and to defeat the evil Amaya once and for all. Be in contact with me soon, and alert all the righteous ones.
233240
To answer this, it's necessary to review something of the landscape. \n\nForces in the universe have been quite successfully treated as gauge forces, using gauge theories. \n\nSo each of the following forces is a gauge force, as shown by the very successful gauge theories that have been developed to describe them. \n\nstrong nuclear force\nweak nuclear force\nelectical charge force\n\nA 'force transmission particle' (or particles), has been found for each of these, and it is the exchange back and forrh of them which seems to "be" the underlying force between two particles. Some of these particles have mass, some have charge, some have spin, ... Finding these things, and understanding how they work, has earned many a Nobel Prize. \n\nFor gravity, the particle which transfers the force has been called the 'graviton'. But, none (and no sequela attributable only to them) has been observed to date. Gravity should have some wave properties, which might tell us something more about it, but gravity waves have not been observed either. Two large experiments are running now which might turn some up so stay tuned. \n\nEinstein's General Relativity treats gravity as an alteration of the character of spacetime itself, and the alteration is stronger closer to the mass. But, there is no limit on the distance of the alteration in the theory, nor in observational reality, as may be seen by gravitationally predictable behavior across galactic and more than galactic distances. Our Local Cluster of galaxies is an example, as they seem to be responding to each others' gravitational influence.  \n\nIf gravity is a gauge force, and the graviton exists, then gravity may have a transmission speed, and if so, there's some reason to believe it cannot be faster than light transmission. If it is not a gauge force in the manner of the others, we are dealing with something which may not have a top speed at all. If so the example of the Earth's orbit not noticing the disappearance of the Sun for about 10 minutes might not be very applicable. \n\nShort answer, we don't know how 'fast' gravity is as compared to light, and are still trying to understand fundamental things about gravity and its behavior. Merely being able to send exploring probes to Neptune and Jupiter's moons and Mars and such is not really evidence that we understand the fundamentals involved. \n\nAfter all, there has been quite recent work on the fundamental nature of friction which may turn out to be, finally, an actual understanding of how it works. We've been able to use it for a very long time, even if we didn't really understand quite what it is. Every basketball player understands friction well as a practical matter of not sliding into the crowd, and hockey players manipulate it very carefully to move quickly, or stop more or less quickly, but neither understands much about its fundamnetal nature. After all, we've only just in the last year or so understood how zinc compounds in oil reduce bearing friction (as in car engines) as they most certainly do. \n\nObviously, science has quite a long ways to go in explaining even some everyday phenomena. It's the nature of the beast.
955030
The dark matter hasn't gone anywhere.  The problem is we can't see it directly because it doesn't or reflect any light (hence the name!).  It is defninitely there, but we don't know what form it takes - is it normal matter that just happens to be really really dark (dark dust, very faint brown dwarfs, isolated black holes)?  Or is it some form of weird, exotic matter that we have yet to discover (I know that sounds far-fetched on the surface, but it actually isn't).\n\nWe suspect that dark matter exists for various reasons.  One is by observing how spiral galaxies rotate.  By watching any object orbit around another (like our Sun or other stars orbiting around the center of our galaxy) we can calculate the mass of the thing being orbitted.  But with all spiral galaxies (and others, too) the mass we calculate is far greater than the mass of all the stuff (stars, gas, dust) that we can see - therefore there must be stuff in our galaxy that we can't see, but that still has a significant gravitational effect.\n\nWe also see galaxies orbiting each other.  Here again, but watching them we can calculate how much mass there is, since mass determines gravity.  If we only had the mass of the visible stuff inside and outside the galaxies, those galaxy clusters should break apart - the gravitational force from all the visible stuff isn't strong enough to hold those clusters together.  But those clusters do stay together, so there must be more dark matter there between the galaxies.\n\nNow you may just be asking yourself "maybe gravity doesn't work the same on the galactic scale as it does here on Earth", which is a question scientists have asked, as well.  But recent evidence suggests that that is not the case - that we really do need dark matter to explain our observations.\n\nIt gets even weirder - we now think there's something called "dark energy" that is causing our Universe to epand at a faster rate, instead of being slowed down by gravity the way we used to expect.\n\nThere are quite a few good books about this stuff written for laymen - just puruse your local book store in the science section.  And if it all seems too confusing, don't worry - it's confusing to the scientists, too!  As I tell my students, if it all seems to make sense, you're not paying attention!
1070149
It can be about 40k some places, but yeah it's low, which is why most go to the dark side.\n\n=)
574940
There is not exactly an xman who sets things on fire just by touch. Gambit charges things with Kinetic energy so they explode by touching them. And there are plenty of Fire controllers and firestarters, but not specifically with just touch. So you're good.
1052554
Well, not speculating on whether dark matter is present or not, we know, from observation that there is something capable of altering the rotation curves of galaxies, causing gravitational lensing, affecting the flow of interstellar gases (including one case, VIRGOHI21, where a bunch of diffuse hydrogen in a region of no stars whatsoever is behaving as though it had a rather substantial mass despite the complete absence of any stars), and altering the large-scale structure of the universe, in precisely the same way that gravity does, and say, electromagnetic forces do not. We know that this mysterious gravity-like force is being exerted by objects that do not emit or absorb light, because we would be able to see it if it was. The simplest explanation for this phenomena is that it is in fact gravity, and that this gravity is being caused by the presence of large amounts of matter that we cannot see - i.e. dark matter. I suggest that you look at the wikipedia articles on this subject for more details.
447237
Dark matter provides the gravitational force that prevents galaxies being ripped apart by their angular momentum.  We have no way of detecting it, except from the bending of light around it.
565936
sure just make sure u do it in absolute darkeness
1153370
The Illuminati does exsist. They haven't be "secret" for a long time now.  And of course the Knights Templer exsist as well.\n\nI beg to differ with another answerer, Opus Dei DOES exsist.  That's why the catholic church is in a uproar over Brown's book.  They don't want it said that the Vatican sanctioned a group of killers to hunt down "supposed" descendents of Christ.  The Holy Grail also exsists, but it is NOT a human person.
303331
It's nearly true... As it was said by Viktor, it's Dark Vador with "o" instead of "e".\n\nAnd for R2-D2 it's true it is D2-R2.
771754
As others have said, it just doesn't want to come out and play.  Believe about 4% of the mass/energy in the universe is normal matter, and about 23% is dark matter.  Dark energy is the major player but is not related to dark matter.  They have completely different effects.\n\nEri is probably referring to the recent "photo" of two colliding galaxies.  I believe that analysis of gravitational lensing phenomena was incorporated in the image to illustrate the distribution of mass.  The image indicated most of the mass in each galaxy had jumped ahead of the visible mass, which was a new way of seeing dark matter.  However, lensing phenomena is still relying on gravity for detection.