Do you think journals on all experiments be published? Why? What if it gets in the wrong hands?
91718
yes I do think they should all be published. \nwhen a scientist comes up with a hypothesis and tests his hypothesis, the only way to see how "correct" it is, is for other people to copy his experiment. this is how today's theories came about--it is how all future theories will come about. if no one publishes their work, who would test it?\n\nif everyone is worried about anything getting into the hands of terrorists, no one would publish anything. you couldn't even email anyone or talk on Yahoo answers even....everyone else has access to these things. terrorists could be using the answers you give to other people. why worry????  just something to think about!
294032
I'm a little concerned that anyone who types like that has made it to an Advanced Communication Skills course...\n\nIn addition, I'm sure you realize that most professors want you to use actual studies where the information has been confirmed in your papers.  You can't confirm that information gathered from an online post-board holds any real validity.  Try using JSTOR for journal articles about prostitution.
894650
Sometimes through your school's library you can have free access to journals that usually require a subscription.  If you go to your school's library's website they might have some information if they offer this service.  Also some public have this service also if you search and print off the articles at the library itself.
52537
Huh? please rephrase: do you want to write a journal about disabled children or do u want one written by disabled children or about them to read or horror of horrors a book on how to disable children(sorry NO HELP THERE THAT IS SICK AND WRONG AND IF THAT IS A YES SOMEONE WILL PROBLEBLY REPORT YOU)
207826
Go to the library.  Open a peer-reviewed journal.  Use that one.
1021930
Not a professor myself, but I know a few instances where it happens.\n\nSometimes getting a high-ranking co-author can be very beneficial to a young scientist - it gets the paper into better journals, more fame, etc. \n\nBesides, scientific community is not that large, and people like to talk about each other's work, so if somebody merely stamped their name on the paper, it will become evident pretty soon.
475545
They are really quality answers. Very well written, to the point and informative. However, just some things you might want to keep in mind... answers like the hypothesis one or red pony were i think answered in a way best suited to Yahoo Answers. But for example you included one of your papers along with the professor's name, course number, etc. etc.... i would not want to include an entire paper of mine in which i had put in so much time and effort, on a site like this. other's might plagiarize even without meaning to do so, and it is best to give them pointers or general comments rather than sharing your entire work. But that's just my opinion, you may feel comfortable sharing it. If I were you, i would keep some of my really good ideas to myself rather than divulging everything... because in the world of academics, original ideas count.
504390
Usually the publication record is used.  In general the more articles a scientist has (provided they don't develop a reputation for doing things badly) the easier it is for them to get jobs.\n\nSomeone who comes up with a lot of really good results will be considered to be worth a lot and IMHO someone who follows the scientific method and does things properly is also of great value.
942097
Good Adi! keep it up.\nYou have definitely bright future. At graduation level people struggle to get the publishable results. If your result is really novel, then you can always send it any chemistry journals (like J. Am. Chem. Soc., Asian J of chemistry, Chem. Eur. Journal., J. Electrochem. Soc., Chem Commun, J. Solid State Electrochemistry). It all together depends on novelty of your results. There are so many other specific journals also, \n\nJournal of Applied Electrochemistry \nElectrochemica Acta\nRussian journal of electrochemistry\nand you also see some standard journals in the following publishers websites\nACS, Science direct, springer, marcel dekker , etc,.\nAll the best.
771556
I don't think so. I think you actually have to do the research, submit it in a background information format, and run the experiment.
84366
It's everyone's business if you're posting it on the world wide web for everyone to read.  If you don't think it's their business, flock your journal.
1037916
In a lot of places they do. I'm going to research it and find a source and then come back and edit this with my source. I remember hearing about places that do that though. Okey doke... I added my source.
50409
Research is funded mostly by private funding.  If it weren't competetive, the scientists wouldn't be pressured to produce.  The publish or perish serves as an important incentive to produce.  Unfortunately for the Korean scientist, it bit him where it counts.  His team tried to lie about their findings, probably to retain their funding.  Deadlines cause drastic actions sometimes.  Unfortunate, but necessary.
96556
you are right to some extent but it is important to publish as all the science work is dedicated to humanity....to serve it....it is man who is responsible how to handle it...like revolver can be used to prtect yourself and some use to kill other....i guess u agree!
215108
Good question but I have to say that messing with the universe is rather impulsive and risky. Perhaps we should look to simpler projects like over population or world peace?\n\n*wink*
1122636
Not too many mathematicians use the term "law." Their work is considered a contribution to a particular theory. Mathematical research is published in peer reviewed journals. These are bound and available in university libraries, a few are available online (if you're a subscriber). If you're looking for a particular area of research, citation indices, bibliographical searches, etc. can narrow your search. Online searches are available for a fee. \n\nEach journal has its own procedure, strict format and page charge for publication (it’s not free). You have to be meticulous about your submission or it won’t get to the review process. You’ll also need to do an extensive literature review and discuss who has published similar ideas. Ordinarily, a mathematician has to publish several papers in a topic to establish themselves before reviewers take them seriously – there’s a lot of crack pots out there and they don’t want to waste their time. The reviewers are experienced and well-established and can be very blunt about what they think of your ideas. If they don’t think you have anything to offer, your manuscript is refused.\n\nYou may be able to send in a short “letter to the editor” type of report that avoids most of this process but the journal editors will still pass judgment on your ideas before they include it.\n\nIf you’re unpublished and not attached to a research organization, your best bet would be to find a university mathematician who is experienced in what you have to say and get their opinion. \n\nhttp://www.ams.org/mathweb/mi-journals.html
965098
I believe this methodological approach compares data from observation of natural phenomena, rather than controlled experiments, to make a credible claim. It may not be feasible, legal, or ethical to do certain experiments, so you basically have to look at what's happening in nature to infer conclusions. Maybe try looking up 'natural experiment' or 'comparative method?'