current largest horse in uninted states?
84280
The largest horse in the USA and the world is Goliath, a big black Percheron gelding.\n\nHe is on tour with Priefert, and he is HUGE!\n\nHe is 19.1 hands (his shoulder is 6 feet five inches, and he can raise his head up a LOT higher!
693210
Virginia, North Carolina, Kentucky and Tennessee are the biggest
329393
hilo hawaii with 120-180" depending upon the year. yes hawaii counts lol.\n\nRainiest uninhabited area in the nation is on Mount Waialeale on the Hawaiian island of Kauai, where 460 inches is recorded.
744835
Brewster County, Texas - the biggest county in the biggest state - as soon as the ice melts in Alaska.\n\nTechnically and politically, Alaska does not have counties. Their geographic subdivisions are called "boroughs."
948539
As far as I can tell from what I have read, technically it is not illegal anywhere in the US.  California, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Texas, and Virginia have laws that try to prevent the slaughter of horses, but the laws are not well enforced.  There are all kinds of loopholes and a great deal of horse meat from the US is exported.\n\nThese sites may help you with your debate.
1111686
It looks like the closest place is in Tipp City, called Padgett Stables.  Here is a list of nearby horseback riding places:
708194
a horse name is YET..or was his
838343
A current horse like the one you describe is Strong Contender.  His is a big strong horse.  He took a while to mature this year as a 3 year old.  He won the Super Derby over Lawyer Ron and Point Determined.  \n\nRumors had him pointed to the Breeders Cup Classic before his connections decided not to race him again this year.\n\nAnyway he's a big horse with a huge stride.\nHis Dosage and CDs are both very low.\n\nHe was bred by Haras Santa Maria de Araras, but I do not know if that is characteristic of their breeding in general.\n\nIn the video, you can see how much bigger he is than Lawyer Ron.  I would have loved to have seen him run in the Classic.
729077
Depends on the species, but the Eastern Diamondback is the biggest and the record is 96 in. (8 ft.) and 35 lbs.
807222
Might be neither if intended for racing. There's a Horse Industry Board . . .\n\nI did a search of cases. Without my going too deeply into the question it seems to me that horses can be any of the above: pets, livestock or racing stock.\n\nThere's one case that dances around the issue without addresing it exactly: F.A, Schottroffe Trust v. Trenary, 10 Va. Cir. 21, 1986 WL 401735 (Va.Cir.Ct. 1986). But even that one is not too helpful; and no Virginia statute addresses the issue. Look for yourself at: http://leg1.state.va.us/000/src.htm\n\n\n10 Va. Cir. 21, 1986 WL 401735 (Va. Cir. Ct.)\n\nCircuit Court of Virginia, Warren County.\n\nF. A. Schottroffe Trust v. William C. Trenary, et al\n\nAT LAW NO. 7594.February 14, 1986.\n\n*1 In this case the plaintiff claims damages arising out of the trespass by the defendant's cattle on the land of the plaintiff in a "no fence" county. The Court is required to pass upon the sufficiency of Ground No. 4 of the grounds of defense setting forth the affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and unavoidable accident. Both parties have submitted authorites on those issues but the Court notes that the defendant has filed no pleading testing the sufficiency of that ground of defense and makes this ruling upon the assumption that the appropriate pleading will be filed to raise that issue.\n\nHenry H. Whiting, Judge.\n\nWarren County has declared the boundary lines of each tract of land as a lawful fence to cattle in Article 1, Section 4-1 of its Code and the effect of this is to make the owner of the animals liable for their trespasses under the provisions of Virginia Code Section 55-330, which Poindexter v. May, 98 Va. 143 , 148 (1900), says restores the common law rule "which requires the owner of animals to keep them on his own land." Tate v. Ogg, 170 Va. 95, 101 (1938), described the Poindexter holding as "...that while at common law the owner of domestic animals was required, at his own peril, to keep them on his own land, or within enclosures, the rule has been changed in Virginia, as to certain animals, including horses and cattle, by legislative action, except in those counties where a .no fence' law had been adopted under the provisions of the Code." (Emphasis added.) Tate held that turkeys were animals outside of the statutory "fence" exception to the common law, making the owner absolutely liable for their trespasses, id., at 104, but refused to grant an injunction because the trespasses were only occasional, not willful and the damages at most were of trivial and inconsequential nature, id., at 107. Minor on Real Property (Ribble's Ed.), Section 122 at page 163, cites the common law rule, including Poindexter v. May as one of his authorities as:\n\n[I]ndependently of statute, or agreement to that effect, there exists no obligation upon the owner of land to fence it in, in order to keep out trespassing persons or cattle, there being at common law an absolute obligation upon other persons to remain on their own lands or in the highways and public places, to keep their cattle there, by means of fences or otherwise. In other words, in the case of cattle and domestic animals, the common law placed the duty upon the owner of the animals to keep them upon his own land by fences or other means, and imposed no duty upon the owner of the other land to keep them out.\n\nThe Restatement of Torts echoes this same rule in Section 504 in the following language:\n\n*2 A possessor of livestock which intrude upon the land of another is liable for their intrusion and for any harm done while upon the land to its possessor or a member of his household although the possessor of the livestock exercised the utmost care to prevent them from intruding. ...The liability imposed by the rule stated in this section is based primarily upon possession of the straying livestock and not upon the quality of the possessor's conduct. The fact that he has
907173
If you mean the Breeders' Cup Classic, then I think that INVASOR is the horse to beat.  BERNARDINI is going to be one of the shortest-priced favorites in the history of the race, and wouldn't be a surprise.  LAVA MAN can't hang with this bunch.  Either of the highly accomplished Europeans, DAVID JUNIOR or GEORGE WASHINGTON, might make an impact.
52282
West Texas A&M in Canyon (near Amarillo) offers the Equine Industry Program.  The Panhandle is a great place to be if you're interested in horses!  Check the link for more info.  :)
454121
At stud since 2005\n\nSee: \nhttp://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/isd/stallion.aspx?stallion_no=5902892
576072
The monument to Crazy Horse.\n\nhttp://www.crazyhorse.org/
551351
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/horse/triplecrown06/news/story?id=2452872\n\nThis is the latest as of 8:39 pm EST. May 21, 2006.
884432
Michigan.\n\nSure, lots of it is water, but it is largest in total area east of the Mississippi.\n\nhttp://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0108355.html
373134
You should keep an eye on "Showing Up," if he runs in the Derby. He and "Barbaro" are both undefeated horses from owners Gretchen and Roy Jackson. If they both compete, it will mark the first time an owner(s) has sent two undefeated horses to the Derby.