is the phrase "2-child policy" grammatically correct???
95807
Try two-child policy. There is nothing grammatically incorrect with a hyphenated compound. However, it is said that numbers ranging from zero to nine should be spelled out and numbers 10+ can be written.\n\nzero, one, two ... 10, 11, 12\n\nThe phone rang three times before she answered it.
424129
Do you prefer it grammatically correct to the last detail??? I can't edit it right now. My head's really aching but here's some criticism:\n\n1) lots of fragments... like \n\n\n"And in this way you create an environment that everybody can't easily spoil with their Farsi witticism."\n\n"Second, bring up various and brand new subjects."\n\n""While I was already a member."\n\n2) She (is she a girl or a boy?)used transistional devices such as FIRST, SECOND, but no FINALLY or LASTLY\n\n3) "By the way, I tried writing something in the club and it just wouldn't permit it."\n\nIN REFERRING TO THE CLUB AS AN ACTION DOER, SHE SHOULD HAVE USED "THEY"\n\n"By the way, I tried writing something in the club and they just wouldn't permit it."\n\n4) wrong use of clauses\n\n\ncan't think anymore.my head's killing me...need to take some pills..\n\n\n\ngenerally, I think when she was writing this letter, it took her a very long time before actually finishing it...hmmmm.....
526340
Yes, you are right.\nIt is also more 'politicaly' correct.
1079109
You certainly can't omit "to have" and you shouldn't eliminate "to be" in (b). I don't quite agree that "I think it true" sounds grammatical anyway. If you like eliminating "to be", use "consider" instead of "think".
1072926
The statement number 1 is grammatically correct.\n(Other answerers - To be grammatically correct, a sentence should not be meaningful -- Consider this: I saw some cars flying near the bottom of the Pacific Ocean when I was eating iron sheets)
647749
The first one is correct.\n\nThe second would be correct if you changed the is to has.\n\nHTH
956344
Yes by the simply natured that their is only one and not two parents to deal with the issues that child-rearing need.  However, that does not mean that a one-parent families cannot be a successful model to rear children in.  \n\nRespectfully!!!
413591
They are all grammatically and syntactically correct. The second is correct, but the expression "possessed of" is more unusual and might be considered incorrect by some (although it is correct).
679939
He is right.  You are wrong. Plain and simple.\n\nYOu are a parent teaching them to be responsible.\n\nNot their friend.\n\nYou are responsible for the dumbing down of America.
412875
It sort of depends on the context you're using it in.  If you're talking to say, a kid, you'd use the first one.  But if you're talking to a friend that's looking for a job, you'd use the 2nd one.  It depends on how you use the sentences.  The first one is more of future tense, while the 2nd one is more present tense.
219215
If it's a compount sentance...\n\nExample:\n\nI'll run for help, you get the fire hose!\n\nThe subjects are 'I' and 'you' with an implied 'and' conjunction (but not really).  The compound predicates are 'run' and 'get'...   So... there you go.\n\nThis isn't two sentences, it's a compound sentece.  (I guess the case could be made that it should be two sentences.)  Keep in mind that I was trying to make a compound sentence with two non-conjunctionated (like my made up word?) subjects.  Really you would say soemthing like "Go get help and I'll grab the hose" which WOULD have a conjunction.
147736
I think it's 2 words, "non threatening" or "non-threatening"
691650
No, they are not the same. The first one is grammatically incorrect & should not be used. The second is grammatically correct & is used in the context of the comparison e.g "Isn't there the same problem in the English government as in the American government, in regards to international trade?"
1038578
No it doesn't sound right does it.  Unfortunately, there are a lot of grammatical issues with advertising and slogans.  This one comes from AOL, if I'm not mistaken.  "You've Got Mail" is shorter and easier to program than "You have received some email."
1104088
It is not.. is grammatically correct for a formal affair..but, it isn't,  would be correct for a less stuffy formal setting.( it ain't, if you're from the south haha)
808585
Yes that is correct. The double " is used  to enclose a quote. A single ' is used to enclose a quote within the quote.
984227
Example: According to Tom Smith who said, "It is a great thing when children cry, 'I want my mommy!'"\n\nSingle quotation marks around the internal quotation. Double about the outer. You may have three together at the end as shown above. \n\nHope that helps.