Let the Kashmiris decide it for them!What do you say?
86748
LET THEY DECIDE UNLESS THEY ARE NOT UNDER PRESSURE
5657
India and Pakistan just need to let it go.  Threaten to give it to China, then the residents will make a decision real fast!
857801
No. I guess u got the wrong info. Let me give u some facts on India / Pak regarding Kashmir since 1947. Its long but i hope u read it. Read especially the part about partition, and the states having a choice whom to join.\n\n\nPakistan claims that Kashmir should be a part of Pakistan bcoz majority population is Muslim (mainly after terrorizing and driving out 600,000 Hindus). The Pak army just wants to use Kashmir as a base for a larger agenda of destroying and talibanizing India and converting it into a Islamic theocracy. And India's claim is based on the treaty signed by the then king of Kashmir (same treaty was signed by other princely states for accession to India) and secularism.\n\nUN Security Council resolutions 38-40, and particularly the resolution of August 13, 1948, said that Pakistan had attacked Kashmir, and ordered Pakistan to withdraw its forces and its tribals (those were disguised as tribals but they were pak army men). Pakistan has yet to obey UN Security Council and withdraw from lands (now called POK, Pak Occupied Kashmir) controlled illegally.\nRecently released documents reveal that in 1948, the then US Secretary of State Gen. George C. Marshall told the pro-Pak British that Kashmirs accession with India was legal and final as far as US was concerned.\nIn 1952, the Kashmir legislature, elected in elections recognized by observers as free and fair, with 100% of the legislators Muslim, voted to ratify Kashmirs accession with India. And the elections after that too were similar. Compare POK with Indian Kashmir.\n\nPakistan gave away a large part of the POK to China, which now claims those lands as its own.\n\nIn April 1993, then CIA director James Woosley at an open Senate hearing said, Pakistan, while not yet on the State Department's list of state sponsors of terrorism, but is Aon the brink. (in 1993, now its worse).\nIn December 1999, the Director of CIA George Tenet and State Department Coordinator for Counterterrorism Michael Sheen testified before a Senate subcommittee that US has evidence that Pakistan is a state-sponsor of terrorism against India.\nIn 2000, State Departments report on terrorism described Pakistans official involvement in terrorism against India, but fell short of adding Pakistan to list of countries sponsoring terrorism because that would have automatically triggered severe sanctions against an old cold-war ally.\nIn 2000, a bipartisan Congressional commission on terrorism recommended to the State Department that sanctions be imposed on Pakistan for its role in terrorism, but this report was ignored.\n\nThe British government in Spring 2001 put several Pakistan-supported organizations openly engaged in terrorism on the official list of terrorist organizations, to be followed later by the US.\nMajor political parties in Pakistan and Pak media have repeatedly asked Pak governments over the years to break bonds with terrorists and get out of the Kashmir issue, because supporting terrorists has resulted only in increasing Talibanization of Pakistan.\nBenazir Bhutto, ex-Pak Prime Minister, has said that ISI (Pakistani governments intelligence service) is a force onto itself, and she had no knowledge of what ISI was doing when she was PM.\nOn 11-21-01, the Hon. Mr. Robert D. Blackwell, US Ambassador to India, told the press that Pakistan-supported individuals involved in killings in Kashmir are terrorists and that They are not freedom fighters. No country will be permitted to provide sanctuaries to terrorists. He made similar comments again on 2-27-02\n\nPak Governments direct and obvious involvement in terrorism against India over decades has resulted in 50,000 HINDUS being amongst 70,000 innocent civilians KILLED and 500,000 TO 600,000 HINDUS FLED KASHMIR IN TERROR; world has been silent about this ethnic cleansing of Hindus from Kashmir.\n\nPakistan, which created, nurtured and protected Taliban, has claimed that Taliban is not terrorist.\nPakistan press reported in Dec. 2001 th
252118
Why not let Kashmir be indepentant ?
657859
Who? The people of India and Pakistan would have to tell their governments to quit it.
1018388
What country would they like to move to, and then ask them to move there!
630402
Well, you have to choose something!
67342
Pakistanis dont want to comprise on Kashmir. Thats the reason they dont embrace each other.
32581
It is better.  Less tension on the Kashmir front for both nations.  This is good since both have nuclear capabilities.
740894
Remember that YOU are in charge so the answer can be whatever you decide it will be.  \n\nP.S. I hope the answer that you choose is "yes".
14923
Jag I'll just say what you're thinking\n\nIndia, India and India
655600
1st of all the facts need to be put in front of people before answering the question with misguiding facts. In fact it was the Hindu Maharajah of Kashmir who was forcefully compelled to sign on document of merging the then state of Jummu and Kashmir with the union of India. This pact was against the wishes of india who stood against the Raja and started fighting against. If we look back into the history of those days we will come to find that the Britishers were also involved in the game. As per principles of the Indian division muslim majority areas were to form the Pakistan while the areas where other communities are in majority were to be included in remaining india. Based on this principle Gurdaspur and ferozpure and other muslim majority areas should have been included in Pakistan, but Mr. Red-Cliff the so called judge and head of boundary commission in order to provide a way to india to Kashmir throuhg Gurdaspur these muslim majority areas where included in india and biggest migration of the century took place in which almost two million people where mascared in east punjab. The story did not end here, the brutalities continuied in all parts of the so called secular state of the world. \n\nThen the world saw another face of so called greatest democracy of the world. The case was put in front of UN by the india itself, after being force by the libration of the people of the state. Although the Russian were backing the indian cause in UN by going far ahead the world was compelled to regard the rights of Kashmiris and it was unanimously decided the UN security council that the fate of the state will decided upon wishes of the people of the state. There will be an option voting for the people of the state whether they want join india or pakistan. It is worthwhile to mention here that there was no 3rd option in the both the UN resolutions on Kashmir. I respect a lot toi the great Jawar Lal Nehru as leader who guided india in its early days of independence, he also accpeted these UN resolutions publically. But later on he refused to accpet the genuine right of the people.\n\nIt is 1988 and now the people of the state started a military struggle for their freedom which was later dominated by the so called Jihadis. Now there are also vioces in the valley for the 3rd option (Kashmiris should neither join Pak nor India, they should have their own country). Although pakistan does not accept this option, but in my own view this should by an option for the people and if they wanna excercise they should be able to do so. \n\nAt last fighting has never been an option / solution for the problems both india and pakistan fought almost 5 wars on this contentious issue but ... we dont have a solution yet. Dialouge and negtiations are the only ways of solving all the issues but both the parties should have postive frame of mind for the resulotion of all the matters and there should be will for solving the problems of sufferng Kashmiris.
312801
Kashmir is a funny issue. It was an independent state with a Hindu ruler and a largely Muslim population. During the partition, the ruler decided to stay independent of both, India and Pakistan. When Pakistan illegally tried invading the State, the ruler signed the instrument with assession to India. He was legally empowered to do so and so legally, Kashmir is Indian territory. To be fair, if the subjects were given a choice, they just may have chosen Pakistan... but now that is hypothetical.\nEver since, much blood has been spilt needlessly over Kashmir. Since neither side will back down, the only solution now is to maintain status quo and convert the Line of Control (the de facto current border) as the official International Border.
925061
Pick Please, \nI took My Time and gave you all  "Best Answers"\n Of course everyone will vote for their own \nBut I Want You to Choose! \nYou Asked Em You should choose. \nPlus it's faster, Clear em out & be done with it!!
954679
I don't think we can do that. Why would you wanna talk to them? I would assume that the Indian governement is a highly bureaucratic one.
1106275
get them to give a lot of money to singapore or sum poor country lalala thats my answer
726339
It's up to the woman/women............... let her/them make up their own minds.\n\n:-)\n\nInteresting question?!!