reference the acticle: Some thoughts on Language Bigotry by Harlan Lane, what is he getting at ?ss?
65235
Do your own homework.
948743
Were you generalizing about one side or the other? Sometimes people pose questions that are phrased like this: "all liberals" or "all neo-cons", etc. If the question had an inflammatory tone or appeared to mock the other "side" then Yahoo probably deemed that it was offensive.
338785
How did the last person who answered this  . . . get arythmia???!!!  Ha, . . .ha ha ha .?! Huh, .. What? ;) \n\nI'm not chastising .  BUT HEY!  AMERICA!  LET'S GET FOREIGN LANGUAGE BACK IN OUR SCHOOL CURRICULA . .  OKAY?  DAMN. \n\nThat's scarey.  Couldn't that person tell it was a foreign language?\n\nSo yeah deliciously  it is Stop! you person (polite only?) or persons!  COMMAND FORM or IMPERATIF (imperative)  AAhh THE FRENCH LANGUAGE  like a outer galactic feast.\n\nThe images that come to my mind when I speak French.  It's heaven on earth.  \n\nI see fields of subtitles, cute French professors, bewildered language deficient but cute male fellow students that only see me as even more attractive because I now haold even more allure because of my ability with language, I see Language learning labs, A+ papers, gleaming transcripts, european field/abroad trips (woouldn't call it study trips because it was more just a 'trip', and I say to \nmyself . . . this is heaven on earth . . .Let me just say that my Wernicke's area IS the pleasure center of my brain!\n\nThank You GOD.
300036
Wow - \n\nYou must be mistaken.  I am totally shocked that a liberal, open minded, free thinking member would have anything to do with squelching your individual rights of free speech that were manifested in a forum specifically established to inquire about such matters.  \n\nParticularly because it was such a seemingly relevant question considering the happenings in the world today.\n\nI suppose I shall have to reconsider my opinion.  I wonder if I'm allowed to do that?
476450
In the age of IM's and SMS texts, the youth of America seems to have adopted a "but you know what I mean" attitude on the topic, which I find disturbing, as well.\n\nFor those folks who throw their hands up in the air, and announce that they are "just bad spallars (sic)", please do the rest of us a favor and click the Check Spelling button pre-submission.\n\nI agree with you so very much.\n\nDo any of you remember Ray Bradbury's FARENHEIT 451 ?  It asserts that since we do all of our logical thinking in words, that limiting the vocabulary of the masses could, in turn limit their thinking.  It's interesting to see that the most unclear thinking seems to be posted in the most dubious syntax most of the time.
490335
Ford says: "Seems to me that you guys, insist to air your views. I do not care what you guys do, or not do, just stop talking about it, day in and day out"\n\n\nTell ya what, Ford.  As soon as Christians STFU about "airing their views" and their hate, we'll follow.\n\nYOU FIRST!\n\n\nAnd, for BettyBoop.  Walk in my shoes, sweetie.  It's ONE EXAMPLE of many.  Many on this board alone.  He took ONE example.  With only a thousand characters allowed in a question, ya can't list them all.  If you don't see a LOT of christian hate on here toward gays, then you are F'ing blind.  It's present in almost every question string in this category.  Just don't stick in in your face??  This means, again, that YOU are free to publicly display your affections, but gays can't??  They must keep it hidden, out of YOUR sight???  F--- YOU and your HATE!!!  You love everyone???  NOT!!!
1003630
I'd just like everyone to know that I have battered down nicolasraage very easily. He is yapping about how liberals can't tink for themselves. \n\nI got fed up with his schoolyard tactics, in a message pointing out that he was, like a kindergartener, making up stories about others so they wouldn't tease him about what he is doing (Lying!!). \n\nHe replied asking me what I hate about Ann Coulter. \n\nI replied saying how well he changed the subject but humored him with a few solid reasons Ann is a *****. \n\nHe replied, and said that if he didn't answer the question, then my question was worded poorly. I had at no point asked a question. \n\nI told him this in an email and he responded yelling "what the he** are you talking about", which was absolutely inapplicable in the situation.\n\nIf you are looking for a good laugh, I recommend trying this. It is great fun.
724881
antidisestablishmentarianism.
773639
for every ones information that doesn't think that this question doesn't fit this category, well sorry it does because this world is turning into another Sodom and Gomorrah look at all of these homosexual people coming out of the closet ( now i don't have anything against gay people i love everyone in there own way i just don't like their ways hey i have ways about myself i don like) but anyway to answer your question i think that he might have gave them another chance but i personally think that they would have screwed up again look at the people in the world now and how we are screwing up our lives.\n\n\nadded text:\n\ni was not trying to offend people it is justthat everyone is upset he asked this question in this section maybe he didn't  know that he asked this question inthis section but look at it like this it could be a sign to why it ended up in this section so peeps chill out dont get all serious with it
744537
"However, when did this country decide that hate crime language is O.K. to spew at a PAYING audience? Why shouldn't the group of people offended sue his *ss off?"\n\nUhh... when the First Amendment was ratified way back in 1776... It isn't "illegal", so the lawsuit would have no merit and be tossed on Constitutional grounds... By the way, I find your "hate crime language" comment highly offensive- expect to hear from my attorney!
350613
S.N.A.G's \n\nSeriously though, men who walk around knowing what fabric softner to use to wash his balls with is a fucking gaymo.\n\nSensitive New Age Guys.\nThat's how the catchphrase goes.\n\nMen are suppost to eat steak, grab their woman's tits at any moment of where they wear no bra and slap their semi-erect penis's against them at any given chance.\n\nNOT bend over, drop their pants and hand them over to the fangita with legs.\n\nSensitive new age bla bla bullshit. Real men only have one thing in mind.\nBeer.\nI was thinking, isn't it sex?\nNo. Beer leads to all things holy, sex, football, happiness.\nFor the majority of us, we wouldn't get laid if the females weren't fitshased.\n\nOkay back to the topic. Men who like to wear pink shirts, wear their collars puffed up and dye a blonde strip in the middle of their head.\n\nYOUR ALL FUCKING HOMO!\n\nI had a logical biased debate but I got too shitfaced.
698619
You're Up! Besides us...Who wants peace?\nAnd now define what peace means and to whom!\nYours is inane rhetoric with no point...Say what you mean!\nFollowing you logic to its logical conclusion makes you a xenophobic isolationists...\nWith conditions I can see some merit in that line of thought.\n  Hey! Mocking your dribble is fun!
1102016
So Meececat, In a discussion about racism, your point is to show that you are an anti-Semitic bigot?? Interesting line of thought.
971828
What a sad little bigot you are, and so young.\n\nAnd a spammer.
1099648
Firstly, I really like the phrasing of your question, Neddie. Beyond the fact I've always been a big fan of alliteration, there is some very clever wordplay in there. Nice!\n\nNeedless to say, I'll have nothing to do with this evil gang of criminals. The ANP is an atrocity and the bush administration IS the fourth reich writ large (in red, white and blue, alas). I truly loathe these people and everything they stand for.\n\nI'll try to read Suskind's book, as I never tire of seeing the truth about these murderous gangsters promulgated for all to see. Mind you, it's hard not to feel nauseous when contemplating that the deranged ann coulter's evil book of fallacies about Liberals is at or near the top of most best-seller lists. What is WRONG with this country?\n\nI'm not sure if the US government has forked over the reward money for al zarqawi's demise but I imagine the Iraqis who provided information on that evil bastard's hideout are entitled to it, blood money or nay. The relevant question, however, is what does it matter? His replacement has already begun carrying out atrocities on the same scale. I guess we'll offer the same reward for his "capture" and then do the same for his replacement, and so on, and so on, and so on... Good grief, when does this nightmare end?
72558
lol! Sorry Libby, I guess excessive typing leads to a lack of self censorship.\n\nHave you checked your other answers recently?
1038635
Would that be like "shooting ourselves in the foot?"  We are really trying to find the "logic" in this one.  Nah, it wouldn't be coveted Yahoo points?  \n\nWhat do you hope to accomplish by acting out the very actions you passionately criticize?  What "incite," oops "insight."  --  a case of "Two wrongs DO make a right?" \n\nCount us out!  It will cost the school money!\n\nEdit:  Bad idea.  We will check with Yahoo to see if an account user can change the rules of this forum.  That is pretty strong language you are using there.  And, no, no one here will march;  we participate in constructive efforts regarding current events.\n\nCorrection:  We did not say we didn't like your posts; we said we do not like the APPROACH of your posts.  This approach creates yet another problem, simple.  Your motivation (to show how much MORE impact YOUR leadership can make than the illegals),  appears cavalier and  misguided.  \n\nWe will, however,  pursue TEGID's  constructive post, instead.  He can count us in.