Did the dingo really eat the baby?
84929
Absolutely, the baby deserved it too.
332339
No.  There was a Quaaga-like horsie that was reconstructed by selectively breeding Plains Zebra to create an animal that looked just like the Quagga, and given birth to by a surrogate Zebra mommie, but other than that it has remained extinct.\n\nThe last one died in the Amsterdam zoo in 1883.
1009636
A dingo is a wild dog (Canis lupus dingo).It is commonly described as an Australian wild dog, but it did not originally come from there nor is it restricted to Australia. Modern dingos are found throughout Southeast Asia, in remainingl forest, and in mainland Australia, particularly in the north. They have features in common with both wolves and modern dogs, and are regarded as descendants of an early ancestor of modern dogs. The name dingo comes from the language of the Eora Aboriginal tribe, who were the original inhabitants of the Sydney area. The earliest dingo fossil was found in Vietnam. They can breed with normal dogs and produce offspring. They are believed to have come to Australia 5,000 years ago.\n\nI have never heard of a screaming dingo or exploding dingo.
878682
i have a few theories on the whole polar bear thing. \n1. the cages that kate + sawyer are in are animal cages, and jack is in an aquarium, so that probably means that they're in an old zoo. the animals must have been let loose or they escaped. but then, if the animals were set free, wouldnt they see more then just one polar bear? and how would it survive in the heat?\n2. its an scientific experiment. the people who were first in the "hatch" were running tests on animals or something, and it escaped, or they set it out to attack the survivors. they could have made the animal more vicious or something, and to test it out, they let it loose and waited to see what would happen. \n im not really sure. but i guess we'll find out later on. im also a little confused about that black smoke. but again, im sure we'll find out later.
331350
The story does not stand up to scrutiny and Fundamentalist Christians are easily embarrassed by it.\n\n(a) Were all 8 species of tiger on there? (some have now become extinct but there were eight), If so, how come they didn't attack, kill, eat and thereby drive into extinction, their traditional prey?\n\n(b) Same question as regards lions. The presence of lions would terrify other occupants of the boat. Even lion faeces has this effect.\n\n(c) With the flood waters rising rapidly, how did Noah, lacking any engine room (not even an outboard motor), manage to nip over to Australia to save the koala and kangaroo, or Latin America to save the llama, or China to save the panda?\n\n(d) There must be hundreds of breeds of dogs recognised by the Kennel Club? Were they all aboard? And if it was just a pair of breeding golden labradors, how come we have Great Danes and chihuahas?\n\nChristians are a bit stuck to explain these things.\n\nThey can't say God created them after the Flood, because, allegedly, there was just one Creation, and no afterthoughts,\n\nNor can they claim "they developed later" because they would be conceding there was such a thing as evolution, which the fundamentalists deny.\n\nAnd the most obvious flaw in the story is the size of the Ark. Was it 30 cubitts x 60 (as I recall)? A couple of camels, a pair of elephants and a brace of buffalo and you'd be fairly full already. The giraffes would have to be on deck, you couldn't stow them in the hold. So how come they all packed into one boat? Realistically Noah would have needed a Dunkirk flotilla of little boats, each with its own crew and skipper, to achieve the conservation of every species on earth.\n\nPS as pandas only eat bamboo, and the whole world was purportedly flooded, not just the lowlying coastal areas, how come there were bamboo supplies ready and available for them, when the flood receded? If there wasn't any bamboo, they would now be extinct, woukdn't they?
501578
1. The barber shaves himself. Because you have written "He shaves ALL and...". All includes himself as well.\n\n2. No, it dosen't support the logic. Ravens could be "Non-black", but still be Ravens.\n\n3. He will hand the baby back. If he was so intent of eating the baby, he would probably have not proposed the question to Melissa in the first place.\n\n4. Lets take two cases...\n\nCase 1...Suppose A is dog.\n\nThen, according to the conditions given,\nB is dog, C is wolf, D is dog, E is wolf, and A is wolf...which contradicts our assumption.\n\nCase 2...Suppose A is wolf.\n\nThen, according to the conditions given,\nB is wolf, C is dog, D is wolf, E is dog, and A is dog...which contradicts our assumption again.\n\nThus, there are no fixed species of animails here, or the data given is insufficient.
564366
The baby dragon in a jar turned out to be a double hoax.\n\nThe original story, reported in several papers a few years ago, was that the dragon was uncovered in a British garage.  The story was that it had been discovered by German scientists in the 1890s and sent to the British Natural History Museum for examination.  The Museum, suspecting a hoax, ordered the specimen destroyed, but the janitor who was supposed to dispose of the specimen intervened and took it home instead.\n\nThe dragon is incredibly detailed, and realistic looking.  It even has the threads of an umbilical cord (which reptiles don't have).\n\nThe reason it's so detailed is that it was actually created quite recently, by Crawley Creatures, the model makers behind BBC's Walking with Dinosaurs television series.  It was commisioned by author Allistair Mitchell (who writes under the pen name P.R. Moredun) as an elaborate means of creating interest in his novel (which at the time had been repeatedly rejected by publishers).\n\nHis book, 'Unearthly History' is a 'thriller for adults and children', and surprisingly enough, features a dragon.\n\nSo it was all a big publicity stunt.  And a fairly successful one too, since it is now being published by Waterstone.
1130359
Predators will eat just about anything, but it's unlikely that a coyote or anything else would just eat the genitalia and then walk away from a feast like that.  If not aliens, the most likely candidate would be people. Either pranksters toying with her, or the woman herself, possibly to continue her hoax.  I've heard crazier things.  So the latter isn't too unlikely.\n\nujjwal, what are you, like ten?  Does your mother know what you're doing?
968273
go to king's outdoor world for pictures\nalso read the blogs on it.\nturned out to be a hoax.\nit was said to be killed in utah but turned out to be a high fence bull taked in canada\nthey even have a picture of it feeding out of a bowl
341080
i believe that people have been mauled by a panda, however they do not actively hunt, kill, and eat humans.\n\neveryone telling you they're a strict herbivore is also false. pandas have been known to eat smaller rodents, like squirrels, from time to time. in fact, a panda bear is made to be a carnivore: sharp canines, smaller incisors, and they even have the digestive tract of a carnivore! this is why pandas must eat so much to simply stay alive.
281651
They are native to Australia and they are marsupials (carry their young in a pouch). They eat eucalyptus leaves which contain enough water so that they don't have to drink. They are sometimes called koala bears, but they aren't actually part of the bear family.
73198
I believe it's originally from the movie "A Cry In the Dark" with Meryl Streep, when the dingos in Australia attacked the baby.  This was a very tearful movie.  But I must say, that in the Seinfield episode when "Elaine" said "The dingos ate your baby" to the obnoxious woman, with her Aussy accent...it was hilarious!
810007
My aunt said she saw one down in mexico. she was checking on her animals in their pens when she something trying to steal one of her goats. dont kno if she was for real tho
1028538
A dog can maul a possum so badly that you'll swear the critter is deader than a door nail.  But you walk away only to find it gone when you come back a few minutes later.  It got up and meandered away while you weren't looking.  Possums really do play dead.  Their metabolism almost comes to a stop, naturally.  It's a self protective device that is so effective it fools almost every single animal that attacks it, and they seldom get eaten after an attack.  They can play dead for hours if they need to.  I once carried one home from a hunt when I was a boy.  I walked, carrying it alternately by its tail and its hind feet until I got home.  The hike was probably about forty-five minutes.  Not once during the entire hike did I see or detect any sign of life in the animal.  I got home and laid it on the porch while I went inside to get a knife with which to butcher and skin it.  I was going to cook it for supper that evening or the next.  The possum was gone when I returned to the porch.\n\nSo, the answer is that they really do play dead.  And very well too.
562972
The story I heard was some Englishman asked a native what this critter was called.  Answer was Kangaroo, which means I don't know
195757
It may have been baby Hughy.
745584
http://www.snopes.com/movies/films/ozsuicide.asp\n\nCheck this out.  Apparently it is not true UNLESS it's some kind of munchkin conspiracy.  I heard they are trying to take over the world from the knees down.