what is judo economics & why is it so called?
91629
http://www.manageris.com/all_en/uk/goulp/0c/101a_cadre.html
303113
ECONOMICS is primarily about the efficient use of scarce resources.\n\nCant get any simpler than this
956974
Koshi Guruma (Pulling), O Soto Gari (Pushing) Ogoshi is nice, but  Koshi Guruma is more effective.\n\nYOu can find all the techniques onthis website:\n\nwww.judoinfo.com
913359
You can watch videos and learn the techniques and language but you can never actually. Learn how to do it unless you have a partner. \nAnd having someone lay there while you try holds on them is not training. find a friend who wants to learn as well and train with them. But keep in mind a lot of the submisions Chokes and arm/leg locks are very dangerous and can be life threatening so I would advise against it.\n\n13+ years of Judo training. Judo is actualy derived from Jujitsu so most of the submissions are the same
982204
Trust me, you have not "out grown" anything. It is not possible to be such an expert you can no longer continue to progress and learn. If you don't hold at least a 6th degree and have been studying Kung Fu for a few decades you can not really claim to be an expert.\n\nAs to learning Judo, I encourage everyone to get experience outside their normal style. I can't reccommend one form over another, they're all great, and I think Judo would complement Kung Fu well. However, you may wish to consider Aikido instead, or in addition to, Judo, asyou may find it easier to adapt to the movements.
696091
Wing Chun kung-fu: Like most of the stylized kung-fu systems out there they get caught up in the who's instead of the why's and how's. The fixed positions and the inability to expand out of their systems fighting position leaves it vunerable to take downs, angled attacks, multiple person situations, and takes too long to implement the ideas to practical use.\n\nTaekwondo: You're represented by the biggest morons out there WTF and ATA. These orginizations are out for your money, boosting their prestige, and brain washing you into believing that there is a purpose to what they are doing. All the while, WTF specifically, handing you this crock of shit on how long taekwondo has been in existance. Because of their predjudice outlook toward the karate/Japanese culture in which it originated from they've developed a sport based on a game played over 1000 years ago and make people think they're actually learning how to defend themselves. They refuse to look toward proper training for fighting effectively taking them out of the true realm of martial arts. Now there are some fairly solid TKD orginizations out there but they're not represented by the vast majority thus undermining any attempt at validating their system.\n\nKempo: Like saying car, there is no true identity for this system of martial arts. Are we Japanese, American or Chinese. Who give a rats ass. Most systems have tried their damndest (is that really a word?) to validate a fairly effective group of fighting techniques while others get bogged down in the muck of trying to lay claim to some wierd Chinese Shaolin authenticity. Kenpo/Kempo has been represented over many years as some of the hardest hitting, most ferocious fighters in existance. There was a reason they became popular but because of greeed they watered it down to a state where you'd be lucky to find an instructor that wouldn't get you killed in your first encounter on the street. Now a majority of kempo guys are fat, out of shape bastards who are more interested in getting your check book then getting in shape. They have gone the way of TKD but fortunately most schools are changing for the better and maybe in the next decade or so they can rise to the prestige they deserve.\n\nShaolin Kung-fu/Wu Shu: Doesn't exist people it's fucking myth, as a martial arts you are learning to be a fucking gymnast/ballet dancer. Fucking stage performers are all they are. If you like that shit fine but stop licking the balls of these so called Chi masters as if most their stuff wasn't parlor tricks and simple athletic acrobatic techniques. Simple and to the point.\n\nOther systems of Kung-fu: if you aren't training in modern ways then you're not training in Kung-fu. Systems were not to be mired down to tradition they were supposed to change with the time, passing on techniques that worked and adding new ones on to make their respective kwoons "bad ass". Unfortunately you've all seen too many Jet Li and Jackie Chan circle jerk movies and believe half that shit is real. It's the fucking movies people get over it.\n\nJudo: Fucking turning into a bunch of pansies I swear, they outlaw so many moves we're soon going to be left with nothing but a pussified sumo match where only pushing is allowed.\n\nJujitsu: The problem here is identity. Like so many arts Jujitsu wears many masks and covers many different areas of grappling. Some Jujitsu systems look like modern MMA events while others are so bogged down in theoretical shit that they have no comprehension on what works and what doesn't work. Bottom line is if you haven't done it against a fully resisting opponent you'll have no idea if it'lll really work. Most of these practitioners get tied down to tradition and never question for a second their "masters" teaching because they've seen him/her throw some cooperative bitch around. Find Jujitsu that works people.\n\nBrazillian Juj
783744
Well, there just so happens to be something called self betterment. Self betterment, can be attained through many ways, mainly, winning, but not necessarily winning against another opponent, you could be winning against yourself. Also, what do you define as winning? Does a soccer player win any less than you when he scores a point because he doesn't beat anybody up? Nah, he won against himself and he won against the other team trying to stop him, that is his sport, his realm, his personal domain where he fits. My niche is judo, i love fighting, but not for the simple fact of hurting people, which is why i love judo, i am fighting yet i can fight as hard as i want, and the better i do actually the less people get hurt. I love the competition, so does the soccer player, and maybe when you get right down to it, so do you, but your definition of winning might be a little harsher than the champion ping pong player's. I know people that do karate, and most of them know that karate is the next best thing to trying to defend yourself with a wet sponge, but in many pure forms of karate out of japan, there is amazing technique and skill involved in everything they do. Much like dancing, a karate kid is trying to make his kata be perfect, same as a ballarena is trying to get that pirouet timing flawless, it's just that ballarenas train harder. I'm sure that if a karate kid wanted to learn how to hurt someone, he could very easily go and learn, it's stupidly simple to hurt or kill someone, which is why i like it where i can fight and everybody can go home and still be in one piece and there be no hate towards me because i removed someones jaw. So yeah, we are all training to win, it is just the definition of winning that you are having trouble comprehending.
407177
This object is not the cause - it's merely an attempt at justification.\nDifferent foreign wars have different real causes, but economics is usually present.  These days it's the over-powerful lobbies of Israel, the CIA and the US Military.
335405
I don't think it should necessarily be taught as a political science, because "economics" is a very broad term. Granted, macroeconomics such as trade, the federal budget, the stock market, are very closely related to public policy. However, economics also covers much smaller scale issues such as a how to operate your own business. In this regard, it is not necessarily all that political.
863148
I have been training in Judo for over 13 years. I competed in wrestling in highschool and usually won easily. Because of my Judo it made it very easy to naturaly to move around the matt and leverage my opponants. The wrestling also held my competitioin Judo giving me new ways to take guys down. \nBoth can compiment each other well. Just remember though in Wrestling you can't do most of the Judo throws or submissions so becarefull not to get disqualified.
792762
I'm not sure exactly what you mean.  Economics is a technical discipline by nature.  In its original form economics began as vague explanations of how markets reacted to change.  These theories were more poetic than current economic philosophy.\n\nSome good examples of art in economics could be the management of a theatre.  The example of phantom of the opera is an interesting example.  Build on that premise.  Watch the movie and you will see the change in demand based on the events that unfold.  That one is fairly artzy fartzy and your teacher would probably love it.\n\nhttp://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:E8FJvWdBNOAJ:johnaugust.com/archives/2005/phantom-of-the-opera+phantom+of+the+opera+economics&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6\n\nhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3260/is_200101/ai_n7959819\n\nhttp://www.thenation.com/doc/20020121/hawkes\n\nhttp://ideas.repec.org/p/tcd/tcduee/20007.html
476262
Macroeconomics is the economics sub-field of study that considers aggregate behavior, and the study of the sum of individual economic decisions. This is in contrast to microeconomics which is the study of the economic behaviour of individual consumers, firms, and industries.\n\nMacroeconomics can be used to analyze how best to influence government policy goals such as economic growth, price stability, full employment and the attainment of a sustainable balance of payments.\n\nMicroeconomics (literally, very small economics) is a social science which involves study of the economic distribution of production and income among individual consumers, firms, and industries. (Contrast macroeconomics.) It considers individuals both as suppliers of labour and capital and as the ultimate consumers of the final product. It analyzes firms both as suppliers of products and as consumers of labour and capital. It is the study of the behavior of individuals and firms that are using scarce resources. Scarcity refers to the fact that none of us as individuals or companies, can "have it all"—unlimited land, capital, labour, etc.\n\nOne of the goals of the field of microeconomics is to analyze mechanisms and market forces that establish relative prices amongst goods and services and allocate society's resources amongst their many alternative uses.
740364
Whoa.  I have NEVER heard of that, and I've been training karate for  several years.  I guess it's a way to prove one's "manliness" on some level!
1092033
The above person is very, very wrong.\n\nTae Kwan Do originated in Korea.  It HAS since spread to thailand and other more southern countries, but it's Korean.\n\nKarate and Judo are both Japanese arts.  They were originally part of the samurai lifestyle "bushido," although karate originated mainly on the southern island of okinawa, where no one was allowed to bear arms so they learned to defend themselves without weapons, or with farming tools.\n\nTKD(tae kwan do), is largely a kicking art.  It does have some punching and other striking but that is mainly the realm of Hapkido, which is sort of a hybrid of korean and japanese self defense techniques and is often taught along with TKD.\n\nKarate is a more even balance of punches and kicks, with other kinds of hand techniques thrown in such as backfists, elbow strikes, shutos, nukites, and other assorted striking forms.\n\nJudo is largely a non-striking sport, and is typically done with heavier gis(uniforms) than those worn in karate.  It is an art focused around throws and grappling, with some emphasis on joint locks, arm bars, and chokes as well.\n\nFor practical self defense, you should look into learning both karate and judo.  Since they come from the same, central art they hybridize very well, and you'll have the skills to be a distance fighter as well as a close-in grappler/thrower.\n\nTae kwan do's flashy kick techniques are more suited to tournaments rather than actual street situations.  If you're looking to win competitions and whatnot, I'd say TKD is on equal level with the japanese arts, but in terms of raw self defense potential, karate and judo come out ahead(assuming you're learning traditional arts and not some funky hybrid).\n\nYou may also want to look into Kung Fu, which originates in china.  It is a slightly different art from karate and TKD.  It's more practical self-defense wise than TKD, but not quite as much as karate(at least in most cases).  It's a very interesting art to learn though.\n\nHappy travels!
205346
Check the Journal of Economic Education
237773
sounds like someone has an economics exam coming up. \nProbably has something to do with employment rates and consumerism.   the ability of the population to keep the economy rolling, by having positive cash flow.
865482
in what terms???? \nwhat good does it bring to sociaty??  economy???  the game????