what caused english colonist in north america to trade goods in new places?
89588
It is human nature to want to expand our resources.
82308
these sites may help:\nhttp://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_1741502192_2/Colonial_America.html\n\nhttp://www.gutenberg.org/etext/8659
321978
A dramatic change in the ways people earned money and made goods that began in England around the mid-1800s. People went from making goods in their own homes with simple tools to making them in large-scale factories with complicated machinery. As a result, many rural regions became more urban as cities grew rapidly around the new industrial activity.
656685
The colonists named places after some of their home land cities/regions. New York, New England etc. Not the other way around
375300
Asian peoples who later formed the native american tribes were the first.  hundreds of years later the vikings (anglo saxons) also arrived to explore the Americas.  Hundreds of years after that in 1492, A spanish Explorer Christopher Columbus, was paid by the Queen of Portugal to find a new route to India.  He choose to sail west rather than east and landed in what is now South America.  He then went on to India.  After Columbus returned to Portugal, he reported what he found to the Queen.  After the news of his adventures spread Spain and Portugal both began sending expiditions to the Americas and formed a few colonies in South and Central America.  \n\nIn the late 16th Century, France and Britain were exploring North America and Britain formed the James town settlement.  The first British Colony in the Americas.  France was also sending convicts to work the land in eastern Canada.  \n\nDuring the 17th century, many British and a few Dutch groups came to the New World for religious freedom.  By the early 18th century young British men were braving the new world in hopes of making their fortunes and some adventurous intellectuals also made the journey.  \n\nIt was not until the 19th century that significant numbers of non-Brits (Eastern Europeans, Italians, Germans, etc.) came to the United States.
692121
Its a new form of colonisation i suppose. The more countries u get under the USA's influence, the more trade oppurtunities it brings to the US.\n\nEven when it comes to wars sponsored by the US, the weapons and equipment brings in money, not only to the economy but to the poilticiens as well.
268427
Very different English colonies on opposite sides of the world produce similar economic systems.
81476
technically Amerigo vespucci (more than likely spelled wrong) was here before columbus. if one wants to be exact...native americans were already here. = )
313535
The war was a result of two major causes: a dispute over repeated violations of American sovereignty by Great Britain, and American expansionism, a desire by some Americans to expand their territory and population by conquering Great Britain's colonies.\n\nThe British colonies were lightly populated and poorly defended compared to the crowded American states to their south, and many of the settlers were Americans by birth and believed to remain sympathetic to the United States. Some Americans argued that the majority of the population in the British colonies would rise up and greet an American invading army as liberators, and that, as Thomas Jefferson suggested in 1812, "the acquisition of Canada this year, as far as the neighborhood of Quebec, will be a mere matter of marching, and will give us the experience for the attack on Halifax, the next and final expulsion of England from the American continent." The belief that the United States was destined to control all of the North American continent would later gain the name Manifest Destiny, but that term was not yet in use at the time of the war. However, the British did have certain advantages, such as having twice as many people and better infrastructure on the north bank of the upper St Lawrence River than the Americans had along the southern bank. Indeed for those living in upstate New York, it was easier for people and goods to travel to Kingston and Montreal, rather than New York City and other points south.\n\nMeanwhile, the United States had grievances against Great Britain for sovereignty violations in three areas:\n\nBritain's refusal to surrender western forts promised to the United States in the 1783 Treaty of Paris, which ended the American War of Independence, together with allegations that Britain was arming North American Indians fighting against them on the western frontier; \nThe stopping of American ships by the Royal Navy on the high seas to search for deserters, and the impressment of seamen who had been born as British subjects but later naturalized as American citizens; and \nThe trade embargos by France and Britain during the Napoleonic Wars, which resulted in the seizing of hundreds of American merchant ships. \nIn 1795, the Jay Treaty with Britain and the Treaty of Greenville with the North American Indians temporarily resolved the conflict on the Northwestern frontier; however, the Monroe-Pinkney Treaty of 1806 dealt only with trade, not impressment, and was not ratified by the United States Congress. Continuing embargoes and the Chesapeake-Leopard Affair of 1807 (which resulted in the deaths of three American seamen under attack by a British ship) further aggravated tensions between the two countries.\n\nIn 1811, in the United States House of Representatives, a loose political faction called the War Hawks, under the leadership of speaker Henry Clay, began agitating for a declaration of war against Britain, both as a response to real grievances and as an opportunity to acquire the British colonies. After a speech by President James Madison to Congress, on June 18, 1812, Congress voted to declare war. By that time, Great Britain had already revoked the restrictions on American commerce, but the news of this arrived only after war was declared.\n\nSome historians, such as Robin Reilly, have argued that the declaration of war on Great Britain by the United States was a victory for French diplomacy, forcing Britain to divert its attention and some resources from continental matters.
357540
had good trading routes
938876
the south was colonized by the french and spanish.  the english colonized new england.  Penslvanya was colonzed by the dutch and germans.
899746
They were looking for a cheap commercial sea route north and west around North America, in order to facilitate trade between Europe and India, China and Southeast Asia.
171792
As trade between Native Americans and European settlers grew and as the Indians received European goods, traditional hunting and trading practices disappeared. Tribes began to compete with each other over trade with the Europeans.  \n\nFirst, as skilled hunters and suppliers of pelts, the Indians were sought after as trading partners and were exposed to white culture. \n\nIn exchange for their goods, the Indians received European products, both practical, such as iron tools and utensils, and decorative, such as bright-colored cloth and beads. \n\nThe Indians also received firearms and liquor, both of which had an enormous impact on Indian lifeways. \n\nA second and devastating effect from trade with whites was the outbreak of European diseases among the Indian population. \n\nA third effect was the long-term ecological disruption of the food chain by the depletion of fur-bearing mammals. \n\nAnd finally, the fur trade had another long-term impact in the Indians by bringing whites onto their lands. \n\nAfter the white traders, trappers, and hunters came the trading and military posts, and after the posts came the settlers.  Resulting in the loss of Native American lands.\n\nMost of what I could find was on the "fur trade", but you can also check the site below it contains more indepth information.  Hope this helps.  Good luck.
678075
It was the Elizabethan Age, the reign of Elizabeth I.  The explorations by the English began then, and the difficulties with Spain and the defeat of its Armada occured then.  There was a good deal of artistic fourishing, and also an increase in commerce and trade, and the usual political/religious bickering.  That was as far as England goes, but all of Europe was similarly in more or less the same phase of opening up to new worlds and new combinations of power and politics and economic growth.
944366
why dont you do your homework? lolz :P\n\nill give you some answers though... just vote me answer the best one lolz :P\n\ncanada needed the colony of BC to secure the land there, so that Americans wouldn't try and claim it. And the lumber industry there was huge.
942242
The Souther Colonies consisted primariy of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.\n\nColonists wanted gold, land, and resources. The biggest reason however was plantations. Many wanted to reap huge profits from growing a variety of crops including tobacco and cotton. Georgia was a colony where English debtors were sent. Though it always acted as a "buffer" between the English and Spanish (Florida).
137658
Northern England.  Other countries found ways to exploit their natural resources.