Romans 10:13 compare New World Translation (JW) with any other Bble?
83371
Jehovah and Lord is the diference. Greek definition is Kurios. it means supreme in authority. thats Jesus in NT
1163507
Whichever one is right for you.  Prefferably the origional hebrew, but the King James version comes pretty close when you're looking for all the right words and correct meanings.  However, I find the King James version very stuffy, and difficult to read and to enjoy reading.  If you're young, you're going to want to read a childrens' Bible to begin with, since it will make it easy to understand.  If you just want to know the Bible stories for general information, you can't beat the 100-minute Bible, which says all the main stories and can be read in 100 minutes - it gives a brilliant overview of the Bible.  If you want to read the Bible for enjoyment not study, why not try to Good News Bible or the New International Version, which might not be so totally-correct as the King James Version, but which are, to a lot of people, easier to understand and read.  Certain branches of Christianity use their own translations, for example, the LDS church uses the King James Version alongside the Joseph Smith Translation, and Jehova's Witnesses use the New World Translation of the Holy Bible. \n\nReally, it depends on the person.  I don't understand people who say there is 'one correct' version of the Bible - it depends on who you are, why you're reading it and what you're trying to find out.
873808
Very different.\n\nPsalm 83:18 (King James Version)\nKing James Version (KJV)\nPublic Domain\n\n    18That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.
287819
The kjv is reguarded as the most accurate and most study resources like the strongs concordance and Mathew henry commentary is based off the kjv. I do most of my study from kjv but teach out of the new international version because it is easier for most people to understand. The most important thing is to read from a version you are comfortable with. The holy spirit is our teacher and will reveal things to you reguardless which version you read from.
241028
I asked a friend of mine that had studied Greek & Hebrew, what was the most accurate translation in his opinion, and he said the King James translation.  I use it.
531716
ASV\nKJV\nRSV\nRSV 71\nGood news\nNIv\n\ni cant remember all\n\nthere are tons of different bible. and all preaches different things. for example.. kjv preaches trinity only in 1 John 5:7 , and RSV , and others has thrown out this verse\n\n..Hope this answers,, but remember Quran has only one version i.e. in arabic
530827
Check this link and request a Bible in your language:\n\nhttp://www.watchtower.com/
640133
That's nonsense.  The NIV is a perfectly good version of the Bible.  I use it myself.  The King James Version is good, but it's difficult to understand, which is why there are other versions.  They aren't corrupted.  And the reason there are so many versions is because the entire Bible was put together in segments of Greek and Hebrew.  They were translated by different people.  However, you'll find that the basic meanings of the verses, what they were meant to say, are the same.  The NIV, NKJV are two that I use and there isn't much of a difference.
574120
There is a Book called the Bible....\n\n\nOne example, Romans 9:13
1107115
The King James Version of the Bible is one of the oldest translations in English...there are many newer versions that are easier to read....check out biblegateway.com and you can read the Bible in various different translations.  My favorite is the American Standard Version!  Good luck to you and keep reading God's word...you'll be amazed how it will help you in your daily life and through the rough valleys of your journey.
621927
Here is the New American Bible word list with links: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/_FA.HTM\n\nWith love in Christ.
892686
Notice, too, how other translations render this part of the verse: \n\n\n1808: "and the word was a god." The New Testament in an Improved Version, Upon the Basis of Archbishop Newcome's New Translation: With a Corrected Text. \n \n1864: "and a god was the word." The Emphatic Diaglott, interlinear reading, by Benjamin Wilson. \n \n1928: "and the Word was a divine being." La Bible du Centenaire, L'Evangile selon Jean, by Maurice Goguel. \n \n1935: "and the Word was divine." The Bible—An American Translation, by J. M. P. Smith and E. J. Goodspeed. \n \n1946: "and of a divine kind was the Word." Das Neue Testament, by Ludwig Thimme. \n \n1950: "and the Word was a god." New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures. \n \n1958: "and the Word was a God." The New Testament, by James L. Tomanek. \n \n1975: "and a god (or, of a divine kind) was the Word." Das Evangelium nach Johannes, by Siegfried Schulz. \n \n1978: "and godlike kind was the Logos." Das Evangelium nach Johannes, by Johannes Schneider.  \n\nThese versions make more sense than the King James because how can Jesus be with God and BE God at the same time? Also, if Jesus IS God, then that would contradict John 1:18 where it says: "No man has seen God at any time."
777393
The KJV is just that---a human's version of the original manuscripts. The translators of the KJV left out God's name in thousands of places. \nHow do you think Jehovah (PSALMS 83:18) feels about that? The NWT respectively put it where it belongs and we show honor to his name and sanctify it just as Jesus said to do in the model prayer he gave in the book of Matthew. There are many new translations that have been put into our modern English language. Do you have a problem with those too? \nWhich translation do you think Jehovah God approves of---one that treats his holy name as a substitute for a mere title, like God or LORD--or the NWT that shows love and respect for his most holy name.?\nJOEL 2:32--"And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of Jehovah shall be delivered."\nWe also use whatever translation a person prefers when we conduct free home Bible studies with them. We can teach the truth about Jehovah and his Kingdom using any version or translation.
1081496
The Bible - New International Version.., (NOT the TNIV).\nThe methodology used in translating and sniffing out suspect scriptures added after 13th and 14th centuries makes this translation the most reverent of most translations on the market today.\n\nEven so, I keep my King James, New King James and the King James Easy Reader versions on hand.
772286
There are over 130 million copies of the New World Translation in print. A printed copy can be requested at no charge using this online form or by writing to a local address:\nhttps://watch002.securesites.net/contact/submit.htm\nhttp://watchtower.org/how_to_contact_us.htm\n\nThe entire text of NWT is also available at the official website of Jehovah's Witnesses:\nhttp://watchtower.org/bible/\n\nLearn more:\nhttp://watchtower.org/library/pr/article_04.htm\nhttp://watchtower.org/e/na/\nhttp://watchtower.org/e/20020915/article_01.htm\nhttp://www.watchtower.org/e/20050715/article_02.htm
618759
http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/276/39/36303
472879
I stick to my good ol King James Version.  Here's a site that really lays out the differences in bibles......\nhttp://www.av1611.org/biblevs.html