Can we upgrade DAO 3.5 to DAO 3.6 ? what are the pros and cons of both the approaches?  Any Performance issues
92683
- There is no difference between Data Access Object 3.5 and Data Access Object 3.6.\n- Only a few patches added which cannot be identificed since its internal handling large database.\n- all the best.\n-------------
14804
HI There, pretty much like it was on version5 - create the connection first, and create your tables and join them..i suggest going on a course couple be an idea because it is actually a bit complex . Check on www.forumtopics.com/bobj\ncheers\ntake care
880069
Use Poweriso\n\nJust convert the .DAA into an ISO then burn. \n\nhttp://www.poweriso.com/
302372
go here and get the version 6.0 >> http://www.oldversion.com/
191691
Well I just checked the forums. It didnt talk about any problems with installing VB 2005 over VB 6. But ideally I would advice you to uninstall VB 6 and then install VB 2005. Because the Express is the new version of VB 6. You dont want the DLLs to clash post installation. \n\nYet will check and revert with exact details.
1003291
* User Interface\n    * Architecture\n    * Programming\n\nBeyond these three major areas, there are many other changes in Analysis Services 2005 (AS 2005) that are outside the scope of this article. I've listed (but not discussed) these at the end of this article. Also not covered but worth noting are enhancements to Transact-SQL in SQL Server 2005 itself which help facilitate BI analysis. For more information, you can find details on all the changes in this Microsoft whitepaper.\n\nKeep in mind that the SQL 2005 version discussed in this article is still in beta; therefore nothing should be regarded as finalized.
801736
you need to upgrade to 6.1 or better
779954
DAO= Disc at once\nTAO=track at once\nSAO=Session At Once\n\nI guess it wants you to use SAO....\n\nIt says SAO is the same as DAO
30829
You may need Java.  Download a Java update.
913661
check here: http://support.packardbell.com/uk/item/index.php?i=instr_memory_upgrade&pi=platform_symphonyspirit
980234
I received a message regarding a java update about 10mins ago.\nMy version is now updated.\nI don't know if this will affect you but do a software update for java anyway.\nIt must cure some current issues.\n\nhttp://www.java.com/en/\n\n.
474722
Try updating to Dapper Drake 6.06 Beta 2.  If you already have Breezy Badger 5.10 installed (not Warty or Hoary!  If you're running one of those, you must follow the following path:  Warty --> Hoary --> Breezy --> Dapper), open up a terminal window and type:\n\nsudo nano /etc/apt/sources.list\n\nChange all instances of breezy to dapper.  Press CTRL+O and press enter to save.  Then press CTRL+X to exit nano.  Back at the terminal prompt, type:\n\nsudo apt-get update\n\nfollowed by:\n\nsudo apt-get dist-upgrade\n\nPress Y to accept the changes.  When you're done, you'll be using the latest beta version of Ubuntu!\n\nIf you do not have Ubuntu currently installed, get the ISO from http://releases.ubuntu.com/6.06/.\n\nBEWARE:  While I have found Dapper to be very stable ever since Flight 5, it is still pre-release software!  Use at your own risk!\n\nEDIT (in response to answers below):\n\n@drlzrdmn: I believe the versioning scheme for the kernel has changed.  The kernel included with Dapper is a stable kernel (both in theory and in reality :-D).\n\n@krishQ As I said originally, Dapper is a BETA version of Ubuntu.  You won't be able to get it with ShipIt (the free CDs amiled to you) until at least June 1, when Dapper is officially released.  However, since he is talking about a hardware issue, he'll probably want to update to Dapper now instead of later.\n\nP.S. - don't ask to be picked for best answer.  That's childish.  The point of Yahoo! Answers is to help others out with your knowledge, not to rack up points.
155175
It depends on the game.\n\nSome allow this, so you can update it or modify the players.\n\nOthers do not allow this.  That is because it makes it more likely that you will buy the newer version the next year.
571873
How many times are you going to ask the same question?? You cant upgrade unless you have the previous version of access.\n\nAddition: Return the upgrade you purchased and exchange it for a full version of access. Your problem will be solved.
959605
hello,\ntally 5.4 duplicate or original, but dont need of dat older version, u hav recent versions of 7 n above, if not even d version of 6.2 will suffice..but duplicates can never give u full functionality. as on considering the tally 6.2 version even duplicates or downloaded from any site, like for free, its supportive featuring for educational purpose. or may extend to somewat more...not much..if dis gonna be ur personal use, not for any shop or major functional activities, its enuf...
467872
I came to this Q&A late, so you probably have already\ndone the upgrade, but I'll make a couple of comments\nanyway.\n\nFirst, if you have multiple machines supporting an app\nserver, I presume that they're all running both the same\nrelease of the OS as well as the same patches (in order\nto get consistent results regardless of which machine\nprovides the service).  Given that assumption (ie. system\nshared objects are the same), I can't see any point to\nthe suggestion that you must use statically compiled\nbinaries.\n\nI think the other advice is really to the point, because\nit is those little details (like updating environments,\ndocumentation, the "pkgadd" database, or other small\npieces of state information) that could cause you\nheadaches later on. If the upgrade really is strictly\nlimited to modifying one directory, then sure, you can do\nit as you suggest.\n\nI'm curious, though, about your comment about\n"downtime".  If your machines supporting the app server\nare replicated, then it doesn't seem like there would be\n*any* downtime if you took them offline (one at a time)\nfor upgrades.  Isn't that part of the designed-in beauty of\nusing multiple machines?
775699
Yes, though it is not going to be as efficient.  It should not have any problems.  Server 2003 is pretty much the same as W2K except is has more features.  Hard to find out exactly what you are looking for, but feel free to follow up.