Give details of the court structure in Sierra Leone?
90823
there is none that is competent, basically if you offend someone you are at risk for on the spot 9 millimeter justice.
120069
Executive, Legislative, Judicial
640466
go to www.africa.upenn.edu/org_Institutes/African_12088.html
1005799
From 1991 to 2000, the country suffered greatly under a devastating civil war. To end the civil war, UN and British forces disarmed 17,000 militia and rebels, in the largest UN peacekeeping act of the decade. The average life span of a Sierra Leonean is 38 years for men and 42 years for women.Sierra Leone is an extremely poor nation with tremendous inequality in income distribution.But beyond these purely economic factors, Sierra Leone also suffers from endemic official corruption. Government officials in successive governments have shown themselves more interested in lining their own pockets than improving the lives of average Sierra Leoneans. This is Sierra Leone's principal barrier to development.
467471
South African courts\n\nTry this first\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_South_Africa\n\nFound two descriptions of the court system:\n\nJudicial--Constitutional Court interprets and decides constitutional issues; Supreme Court of Appeal is the highest court for interpreting and deciding nonconstitutional matters.\n\nAdministrative subdivisions: Nine provinces: Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga, North-West, Northern Cape, Limpopo, Western Cape. \n \nhttp://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2898.htm \n\nThe Cape Supreme Court was established in Cape Town in 1828. When circuits round the Cape Colony became too arduous, divisions of the Court were established in the Eastern Cape and in the Northern Cape (then known as Griqualand West). The Natal Supreme Court was established in 1857. The first High Court of Justice was set up in the Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek in 1877, while the Orange Free State instituted a High Court in 1854. \n\nFollowing the Union of South Africa in 1910, a new Supreme Court of South Africa was formed, with provincial and local divisions in all four provinces. A new Appellate Division in Bloemfontein heard appeals from the other divisions of the Supreme Court and set precedent which was binding country-wide. The 'independent states' created during the apartheid era established superior courts in their territories. In terms of the new Constitution, the existing provincial and local divisions of the erstwhile 'Supreme Court' (including the courts in the TBVC states) were renamed High Courts, and the Appellate Division was re-established as the Supreme Court of Appeal. \n\nA new superior court, the Constitutional Court, was established to decide matters based on Constitutional provisions. The website of the Court consists of a full text database of all Constitutional Court cases handed down since the first hearing in 1995. Documents available for viewing, printing or downloading include full judgments, summaries of judgments highlighting the main questions of law decided in each case as well as heads of argument, pleadings and documents.\n\nOther superior courts, created in terms of separate legislation, include the Land Claims Court and the Labour Appeal Court.  In addition to these superior courts, district and regional magistrate courts hear minor civil and criminal matters. Decisions of lower courts are not reported. The Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration tribunals attempt to settle employment disputes. Until 1950, the English Privy Council was the highest court of appeal in the South African judicial system. South Africa no longer has a jury system. Juries were finally abolished for all courts in 1969.\n\nhttp://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/South_Africa.htm#_JUDICIARY
345458
GO to the court house and check on what your looking for\nthank you
139123
The lower court in Scotland is the Sheriff Court. Each Sheriffdom (of which there are six) has a Sheriff Principal. There are 49 Sheriff Courts within the Sheriffdoms, with a judge, known as a Sheriff.\n\nThere are 3 legal areas within a Sheriff Court: Civil, Criminal and Commissary. The civil jurisdiction, though inferior, is extensive and the majority of civil cases raised in Scotland are taken in the Sheriff Court. There is an appeal from Sheriff to Sheriff Principal and to the Inner House of the Court of Session. An appeal may be taken to the Inner House directly. From the Inner House further appeal may be taken to the House of Lords. In criminal matters the Sheriff also has a wide jurisdiction in relation to most crimes; only those of greatest gravity lie outwith the Sheriff's jurisdiction. There is no appeal from Sheriff to Sheriff Principal in criminal cases, the appeal lies to the court of criminal appeal.\n\nThe superior court in Scotland is the Court of Session formed by the Inner House (comprising the first and second divisions) and the Outer House (where only single judges or Lords of Session also styled Senators of the College of Justice sit). The principal judge is the Lord President, who leads the first division, whereas the Lord Justice Clerk leads the second division. The court sits only at Parliament House in Edinburgh.\n\nThe highest civil appellate court is the House of Lords which sits in Westminster. The judges who sit in the House are the Lord Chancellor, the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, and those peers who hold or have held high judicial office. The House of Lords has an appellate jurisdiction from Scottish courts in civil matters only; it has no Scottish criminal jurisdiction.
423523
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/lowcost/flfcountysandiego.htm\n\nhttp://www.abanet.org/legalservices/probono/directory/california.html
225747
The legal system in The Bahamas is modeled on the British pattern and independent of the political process in the country.\n\nFurther, the judicial system is multi-tiered, including the Magistrates Court, The Supreme Court and The Court of Appeal, which sits as the highest court. The final appellate court of The Bahamas is Her Majesty’s Privy Council in London, providing for due process and final review where necessary. \n\nThe independence of the judiciary and Bahamian sovereignty provide The Bahamas with a unique environment for the conduct of international services.
121434
Legislative, Executive, and Judicial
523760
The web address is:  http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/Courts/\n\nYou can find information under the tabs at the top of the homepage for Civil or Criminal law.
822464
go to news today it will give u all the details.  good luck
261137
Maputo / Mozambique - see link below.\n\nhttp://allafrica.com/stories/200603120005.html
423571
try this: \n\nhttp://courts.michigan.gov/
882267
11.0 GENERAL PROVISION \n\n(a) Assignment of Judges.\n\n(1) Appellate Division. Four judges are assigned to the Appellate Division by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. The Appellate Division is in Room 607 in the Central District. \n\n(2) Department 70. Each judge assigned to the Appellate Division is also assigned to Department 70 of the Central District, Room 607. The Judges in Department 70 are assigned on a rotating basis and to be heard by one judge, petitions for writ of habeas corpus that are filed in conjunction with an appeal pending in the Appellate Division. The assigned judge's decision is dispositive of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. \n\n(Rule 11.0(a) amended and effective 7/1/2001.) \n\n(b) Appellate Jurisdiction. \n\n(1) The Appellate Division of the Superior Court has jurisdiction over all appeals arising from all misdemeanor, infraction and limited civil cases in Los Angeles County (except small claims appeals) and over all motions and petitions for stay orders in connection with such appeals. (Code Civ. Proc., § 77(e).) \n\n(Rule 11.0(b)(1) amended and effective 7/1/2001.) \n\n(2) Decisions. A panel of three judges participate in each matter before the court. The concurrence of at least two judges is required for a decision in any case. (Code Civ. Proc., § 77(a),(b) and (d).) \n\n(c) Writ Jurisdiction. \n\n(1) The Appellate Division has jurisdiction over all petitions for writs of mandate, prohibition and review (certiorari) in any misdemeanor, infraction or limited civil case. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1068(b), 1085(b) and 1103(b).) \n\n(2) Decision. A panel of three judges participate in each petition for writs of mandate, prohibition and review (certiorari) in any misdemeanor, infraction or limited civil case. The concurrence of at least two judges is required for a decision in any petition for a writ. (Code Civ. Proc. § 77(a),(b) and(d).) \n\n(Rule 11.0(c)(1)&(2) amended and effective 7/1/2001.) \n\n(Rule 11.0 [1/1/95] amended and effective 7/1/2001.)
674571
go to the local council of that area\nthe municipal\nit's known as majlis perbandaran in Malay
315141
Try this link, it will get you the info you need...\n\nhttp://dw.courts.wa.gov/index.cfm