What is "Reality" out there as per Quantum Physics concepts?
93066
reality in quantom physics is all probability.. there is a probability that a particle comes into existance... etc
1098317
The holographic model of the universe: The universe consists of information which is projected in it's manifestation.\n\nComputers are a good example of this. All of the information on your computer...or most of it, is stored as 0's and 1's in the form of magnetic clusters on magnetic plates.\n\nBut, YOU see this message and websites and pictures of Angelina and Brad's baby. You experience 3D games with music and walk your character through hallways where nothing really does exist on the other side of that wall because it is just a projection of information stored elsehwere...and maybe the information for something on the other side of that wall doesn't exist.
306187
Everything is Just Perfectly Real, Happening & Existing!\nJust Like the Reality T.V. program---
226579
Man there's all kinds of nonverbal communiation.\nBody language, etc.\nbut\nI feel you're wondering about cooler stuff like psychic powers and whatnot...\nPhysically, it all seems possible to me;  One can spends hours, days, weeks researching QM, and a mild conceptual understanding of the amazing subatomic world that makes up our physical reality can really leave one with lots of questions and interesting conclusions...\nWe're built of all those amazing little atoms too.\nThey say we can't really dabble in the world of the quantum mostly because we can't measure it without changing it.\nScience just can't make sensitive enough machines...\nIt took several million years, but we may each have grown an instrument powerful and sensitive enough to muck around in the quantum world.\nI'm talking about the brain, of course.\nPerfect instrument\nno eyepieces, screens, readouts,\nit's wired directly to our perception
85970
Well that's a good question.  I think so!  There are many things that are real, we don't have to always understand how it works for it to be real!
707791
Besides the classic standard model of quantum mechanics, there's the superspace version where all possibilities happen in alternate universes.  Then there's string theory and its higher dimensional cousin m-theory.  As far as I know, that last is most current.  Recent Nobel prize for it at Institute of Theoretical Physics at UC Santa Barbara.  But see link as well.
475801
A good book is called the new quantum universe.  You'll need to give yourself a bit of time to absorb all that information.  But it contains all the basic ideas, formulations and explanations to get started
215754
Very philosophical.  Everything is already in our head and is relative to the beholder.  The same can be said for life and all that applies.\n\nThere are three positions on what reality is:\n1.  Reality is Hidden\n2.  Reality is Attainable\n3.  No one agrees as to what reality is\n\nSee the source below for full details.
362081
Not much;  quantum mechanics is pretty much taken for granted (by physicists, NOT philosophers!) as the framework of almost all of modern physics (but gravity's another story...).  In that sense almost all physics research these days is "quantum" physics.  However, there is still some interesting work being done with phenomena that are distinctly quantum mechanical, such as Bose-Einstein condensation, quantum entanglement, and the like.\n\nI'd just like to point out that in the past 100 years since quantum mechanics was "born", no experiment has been performed whose results are not consistent with quantum mechanics.
484232
According to quantum mechanics, an object exists for you only when you are aware of its existence. Otherwise it is a probablitly.\nI will give an example: If you look away from your computer to say a TV, then the computer object has ceased to exist and TV has started existing. But the you who is looking at TV is different from the previous you who was looking at the computer, because when the computer ceased to exist, so did you and so did the universe frame containing you, computer and the elements like light that made looking at computer possible. Now you, TV and the process of looking at TV is happening in a different universe.\nNow if you again turn your head to look towards computer, you will cease to exist with the TV universe and enter a third universe identical to the first universe. But how do you see the same computer if you are entering the new universe, then this is one of the less known uses of our memory, that is being used by the universe to make fools of us.
322257
I agree. Every single emotion; every single scenario imaginable; both sides of the extreme and what lies in between will occur in this universe. In my opinion, anything is possible in this universe…ANYTHING! And I don’t think this universe has meaning without human ‘observation / awareness’ (consult ‘the observer effect’ in quantum physics + my question about the sound of tree falling in the forest).
246571
Quantum Physics The Science is us we they me I you and our perception and control over our reality here on earth.Using our minds the way it shoulb be hopefully we will be able to see all the connections.We will I am thinking about it right now.
730142
Possibly so. Possibly no. I'd say the Heisenberg uncertainty principle comes foremost into play here. Maybe also Schrödinger's cat. Is it dead or still alive? That would make a significant difference, you know. These questions can't just be taken so lightly. And how could you even consider Y!A as a forum to resolve such complex issues as this? More to the point, even assuming Planck scale dynamics can be fully understood with the mathematical tools we have at hand today, where exactly does that get us? We still don't know what topping to put on our pizza this weekend. Or whether a third eye would make a good chick magnet. Or even whether that darn cat is still alive or dead.... 'tis an enduring mystery. And we wouldn't want to take all the mysterious challenge out of life, now would we?....Meow.
846023
theorotical physics is a subject based on quantum physics.......... basically there are no practicals in this subject and it depends only on theory
990811
Quantum mechanics is a fundamental physical theory which extends and corrects Newtonian mechanics, especially at the atomic and subatomic levels. It is the underlying framework of many fields of physics and chemistry, including condensed matter physics, quantum chemistry, and particle physics. The term quantum (Latin, "how much") refers to the discrete units that the theory assigns to certain physical quantities, such as the energy of an atom at rest.
273051
The theory: reality as we know it is \nrestricted to time and distance. Comparing\nthis with a narrow path, branching off \ncould be countless realities.  This would\nexplain angels and ghosts, coming in and \nout of dimension.  Even UFOs which are \nsometimes seen, more often not could have\nthe same explanation.  In spite of our egos\nand scientists who have all the answers, we\nonly use a small part of our brain and the\npart we use is very limited when you consider\nthe greatness of God and his creation.
10601
This is one of those wierd questions in Quantum Mechanics where there is no way to visualize the answer. Our brains, understandably, have evolved to handle falling rocks, jumping tigers, and other macroscopic objects. We have numerous hardwired responses to these things which follow classical, Newtonian Physics.\n\nOn the atomic and subatomic scales where objects behave according to the laws of Quantum Mechanics things are different. An electron can behave like a wave in this experiment, but a particle in another experiments. According the classical physics (and our macroscopic-loving brain's "common sense) nothing can be *both* a particle and a wave. \n\nSo what is an electron? A wavicle? A partiave? \n\nNope. An electron is a, well, an electron. Sometime it will behave *exactly* like a wave, other times it will behave *exactly* like a particle. Never will it behave like some intermeditate or mixed state.\n\nThe problem - to the extent there is a problem - is that we cannot visiualize this. There is no way to form a picture in our heads the same way we can form a picture of a ball flying though the air. Our brains are meant to operate on macroscopic phenomena, and subatomic phenomena just behave differently.\n\nPresumably some other alien species could have some sort of mind, or mind-like thing, for which the whole wave-particle duality thing just makes perfect sense! But presumably this aliens would be confused by what are to us the simple motions of a ball flying through the air.\n\nSo, in the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, there is no sense in which the "other forms" of an object change after a wavefunction is collapsed. That this seems to be a problem is more a function of our brains and how they have evolved.\n\n\n(As an aside, it should be said that it is possible to understand the mathematics underlying Quantum Mechanics. And to be able to use this math to make extremely accurate predictions of how electrons, atoms, etc. will behave. These predictions can be tested experimentally and Quantum Mechanics holds up extremely well. \n\nSo while QM is very wierd, there is an enormous amount of evidence that it is correct.)