why is intel better than amd?
88239
Overall, both companies produce processors within striking distance of one another on nearly every front — price, power, and performance. Intel chips tend to offer better performance per core, but AMD compensates with more cores at a given price and better onboard graphics.
899095
Because its single-threaded performance is stronger, its multi-threaded performance is also stronger, and it performs quite well against the Core i3, if typically not quite as well as a Core i5. Gaming: HH's results show Ryzen 3 losing against the Core i5, but suggest better performance against the Core i3.
179554
The FX 8350 is the best AMD processor out there. Although it beats sandy, Ivy is better than it. However it can easily be overclocked to an i7's performance level. It has beaten many Ivy bridge processors too in multi threaded applications, but the i7-3770k is still above it and has a higher price.
22878
Short Answer. The AMD Ryzen and the Intel Core CPUs offer similar performance, the former being better at multi-tasking while the latter are faster when it comes to single-core tasks. However, Ryzen CPUs tend to offer better value for your money.
496170
Yes, it can and most of the user use AMD CPU's with Nvidia GPU because AMD CPU's are very cheaper and also provides the better CPU power and performance than intel. ... YES YOU CAN USE A NVIDIA GPU WITH AMD CPU.
474877
In Intel's simple terms, the Core i9 is faster than the Core i7, which in turn is faster than the Core i5. But "faster" isn't always "better" for you. A lot of people don't need that extra horsepower, which also affects battery life in laptops.
555645
AMD's third-generation Ryzen CPUs are some of the best processors ever made, offering fantastic single-threaded performance and even more impressive multithreading capabilities. This makes them perfect for productivity tasks like video editing and transcoding, but also excellent at gaming.
193281
As for performance, Ryzen 5 6-core CPUs are easily beating even the i7 4-core CPUs in heavily multi-threaded applications like video rendering, animation, etc. ... So, bottom line: yes, AMD Ryzen 5 is performing good. Ryzen is a platform that took almost 6 years to make, and it was worth the wait.
783743
UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i5-7400. 4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.0GHz, Kaby Lake. ... Slightly faster octa-core speed.
1027493
A CPU's per core peformance is better in games, but in multi-threaded applications such as rendering then more cores will suit you better.
254807
Currently, Intel positions present-day Pentium processors near the middle of their product line, generally better than Atom or Celeron processors (found in every low-end PCs), and generally not as good as the i3, i5, i7, etc. processors (found in most mainstream PCs).
979311
Demanding games require both a smart CPU and a powerful GPU. ... Many tasks, however, are better for the GPU to perform. Some games run better with more cores because they actually use them. Others may not because they are programmed to only use one core and the game runs better with a faster CPU.
1384273
Threadripper's competitive advantage is that AMD offers more cores for the money than Intel. Most games are lightly threaded and care more about how fast each core is and Intel has a significant lead there. Actually, aslong as they are not the WX, they are as good for gaming as other high end processors.
120133
The extra processor cores offered by Ryzen compared to Intel's Kaby and Coffee Lake CPUs means that certain tasks will run MUCH faster. ... The extra cores can also help with video game streaming on services like Twitch. With Computex on the horizon, AMD are sure to be readying the next wave of Ryzen hardware.
318866
a6's integrated gpu is better than i3 and i5's integrated gpu. a6's cpu side is less powerful than core i3/i5 processors. if you're doing processor intensive tasks (like heavy software like android studio) i3/i5 will perform better than the a6. ... a6 is decent for low resolution casual gaming.
595298
Back to processors for music production: What is better: Intel or AMD? The safe bet is Intel, because it simply works, but might be more power hungry and less powerful. The less safe bet is AMD, because the compatibility rumors keep hunting AMD's image.
120760
It's mainly because Intel Atoms are designed for ultra low power solutions, not really for performance. They have been getting better over the years, but a Celeron from the same time can usually outperform an Atom.