why mvvm is better than mvc?
231894
MVVM will be easier to test and provide even finer separation of concerns when compared to MVC, but it also tends to be much more complex and time consuming to develop.
878129
['1- Attribute Routing. The major difference in ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET web forms is the way incoming requests are handled. ... ', '2- Default MVC Template replaced by Bootstrap. ... ', '3- Improved Identity Management and third party Authentications.']
397244
4 Answers. Bottom line: yes, if you are implementing MVC or MVC-like architecture, then your views should be requesting information from the model layer. Also, you should note that this is NOT what so-called "mvc frameworks" are pushing for. In the Rails-like frameworks there is no view.
870477
The answer is that WPF offers a few major advantages: ... 2 WPF has an inbuilt storyboarding feature and animation models. 3 Data binding is very much better than with the WinForms application. 4 WPF allows you to handle large data sets because of it has a built-in 'user interface virtualisation' feature.
291997
1 WPF has the ability to separate UI from logic effectively. 2 WPF has an inbuilt storyboarding feature and animation models. 3 Data binding is very much better than with the WinForms application. ... 10 WPF enables programmers to develop much of the application in a completely declarative model, using XAML.
225350
IMO the main difference is that Textbox is not strongly typed. TextboxFor take a lambda as a parameter that tell the helper the with element of the model to use in a typed view. You can do the same things with both, but you should use typed views and TextboxFor when possible.
965835
And SVG is faster when rendering really large objects, but slower when rendering many objects. A game would probably be faster in Canvas. ... Canvas would be better for faster things and heavy bitmap manipulation (like animation), but will take more code if you want lots of interactivity.
107178
Although Management Studio is based-upon Visual Studio, the two are different products and have different target audiences. ... Visual Studio is primarily used to make development easier whereas Management Studio is orientated towards making the management of SQL Server easier (with some development components.)
1259300
WebAssembly can be faster than JavaScript because it's the result of ahead-of-time compilation of some high-level programming language, such as C++ or Rust. JavaScript, on the other hand, is parsed, compiled, and optimized at runtime. All these operations have overhead, which is avoided with WebAssembly.
1117566
I think Bitwig has superior tools for creating tones and manipulating sounds, but Ableton makes getting really good sounds very quick and simple. ... i enjoy bitwig more than ableton & think modulators are more useful than m4l, but neither one has a great midi roll.
814575
The MMD program is EASY… So for people who already know how to animate, the program is really easy to use and this is one of the reasons why it became so popular so quickly (and remains so). If you don't believe me, try animating a model in a program like Blender.
1223322
They are also similar in nature when it comes to writing code. Vue. js is more lightweight, while Angular is more enterprise ready for developing complex applications. However, many enterprise users testify that Vue has its place in enterprise application development.
1089926
Using Containers on Top of VMs a virtual machine, both have their own advantages. Containers are lightweight and have a very quick kickstart. They can be kickstarted as fast as a process. Another advantage is that they entail less compute overhead than a virtual machine.
589203
DJANGO MVC - MVT Pattern The Model-View-Template (MVT) is slightly different from MVC. In fact the main difference between the two patterns is that Django itself takes care of the Controller part (Software Code that controls the interactions between the Model and View), leaving us with the template.
1277733
React and Vue are both lightweight, have component-based architecture, and expose lifecycle methods. Their performance is fairly similar so those differences are too negligible to be discussed. Both technologies can easily be plugged into any existing web application, even if it's not a Single Page Application.
17158
While WPF is over a decade old and has been improved greatly over the years, there are still several areas that can suffer from poor performance. The reasons for this poor performance include things such as bad coding practices, broken bindings, complex layouts, the lack of UI virtualization, and much more.
755688
MVC is suitable for Windows Applications also. ... If you are going to develop the Desktop application in WPF, then the best pattern is always MVVM. If you are going to develop the normal windows applicationsm you can go ahead with MVC. There are many debates and disucssion on where and when to use which patterns.