are judge rinder's rulings binding?
528504
Are Judge Rinder cases legally binding? Yes, Judge Rinder's awarding of sums up to £5,000 are lawfully enforced. However, these bills are actually paid by the show itself, rather than the defendant who does not receive a fee to appear on the show.
1192625
For criminal matters, a magisterial district court judge handles summary offenses, preliminary hearings, and, in some counties, arraignments. ... The court of common pleas is not bound by the magisterial district court's decision and will review the case de novo (as new).
1285793
' It is now well-established that circulars issued by the CBEC or the CBDT do not bind assessees. Thus, the assessee has the right to challenge the correctness of a circular before a quasi-judicial authority constituted under the relevant statute.
222369
He appoints the Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. He can remove a Judge if he receives an address to that effect from both Houses of the Parliament. He can also transfer High Court Judges. The President has the power to pardon, reprieve, and respite, remit, suspend and commute sentences of convicted persons.
1106292
You might think of the word justice in order to remember the meaning of the word just, which means "fairness or righteousness." An unjust judge does not play by the rules; he might send a person to jail even though there isn't enough evidence that a crime was committed.
374431
Common Law System Judicial decisions are binding – decisions of the highest court can generally only be overturned by that same court or through legislation; Extensive freedom of contract - few provisions are implied into the contract by law (although provisions seeking to protect private consumers may be implied);
378384
It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional, though what counts as obviously unconstitutional is itself a matter of some debate. Judicial restraint is sometimes regarded as the opposite of judicial activism.
647441
Because the courts are not bound by procedural and political constraints of any legislative process, they can, therefore, achieve law reform faster. Courts and judges are not controlled or dominated by ideology or party politics compared to their counterparts in the legislative.
1073023
Some states do not allow a default judgment to be entered against some defendants while other defendants are actively litigating the same case; this is an application of the "one final judgment" rule. ... Otherwise, a default judgment must be issued by a judge, who may require the plaintiff to present proof of his claims.
1277240
If an agreement, policy, or rule is set in stone, it is completely decided and cannot be changed. The exact terms of the scheme have yet to be set in stone. These are just preliminary ideas and nothing is set in stone.
1448225
['Critical-reasoning skills. Judges must apply rules of law. ... ', 'Decision-making skills. Judges must be able to weigh the facts, apply the law or rules and make quick decisions.', 'Listening skills. ... ', 'Reading comprehension. ... ', 'Writing skills.']
1474758
Judges are only required to render decisions based on existing facts and laws. ... Security of tenure – Once appointed, a judge is entitled to serve on the Bench until the age of retirement, unless there is good reason for them to be removed from office.
772441
What is the judge's opinion of Huck's father? He is thoroughly bad and cannot be reformed. He is prone to displaying unpredictable behavior. He should be trusted by Huck because he is his father.
1408188
The High Court found that a trial judge is able to direct a jury to return a verdict of not guilty where a verdict of guilty would be 'unsafe or unsatisfactory. ... So, all in all, courts can intervene to either direct the outcome of a case – or overturn a verdict of guilty – but these situations are rare.
862727
A parenting plan is not automatically legally binding. However, there is the option of formalising the agreement through a Consent Order.
211833
Similarly, state courts must sometimes decide issues of federal law, but they are not bound by federal courts except the U.S. Supreme Court. A decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, a federal court, is binding on state courts when it decides an issue of federal law, such as Constitutional interpretation.
1284356
Marriages conducted by Ikoyi registry not legally binding, court rules. ... He said the decision of the court is supreme and is legally binding on all and that all marriages conducted and registered in any of the 20 local governments and 37 local council development areas are valid and in accordance with the marriage act.