What is the appropriate command when one is thirsty?
"Eat" is to "feed" as "drink" is to what?
I'm unable to get Atom text editor from the Software Center. When I try I get this error:  Package does not exist. Check the spelling of the package name, and that the appropriate repository is enabled. Surface of genus $g$ does not retract to circle (Hatcher exercise) Can a multiclass sorcerer make spell slots for their other class using sorcery points?  For example: can a multiclassed sorcerer 3 / warlock 1 use Flexible Casting to create a warlock spell slot? Good 1st PDE book for self study What is a good PDE book suitable for self study?   I'm looking for a book that doesn't require much prerequisite knowledge beyond undergraduate-level analysis.  My goal is to understand basic solutions techniques as well as some basic theory. What's the typical microclimate in the aircraft passenger cabin? When preparing for a commercial jet flight it'd be nice to know how warm my clothes should be so that I don't freeze after sitting for several hours in say +16 degrees Celsius (61 degrees Fahrenheit).  What's the typical temperature in the passenger cabin? Are there air drafts? How cold and how warm can it reasonably get? How are Clash of Clans multiplayer battles determined Are battles determined by level or trophies? Just curious. Gauss's Law with Moving Charges I'm trying to run down a memory leak in a windows forms application.  I'm looking now at a form which contains several embedded forms.  What worries me is that the child forms, in their constructor, take a reference to the parent form, and keep it in a private member field.  So it seems to me that come garbage-collection time:  Parent has a reference to the child form, via the controls collection (child form is embedded there).  Child form is not GC'd.  Child form has a reference to the parent form, via the private member field.  Parent form is not GC'd.   Is this an accurate understanding of how the garbage collector will evaluate the situation?  Any way to 'prove' it for testing purposes? Is Cursed Child canon to the original story? From what I am hearing the stage-play called The Cursed Child is based on the characters from the Harry Potter series. It is set 19 years from the end of Deathly Hallows (i.e. When Harry's children are starting their time at Hogwarts).   I have also seen the J.K. Rowling has had at least some involvement and been on the set and a part of rehearsals, etc.   My question is has there been a statement given relating to the canon of the stage play to original series? If so, would any conflicting information be considered a retcon?  Related:  - but not dupe because this asking about in-universe information. ref to subsection number only is there a way to reference the subsection part only? Example:  \documentclass{article} \begin{document}  \section{This is my section} For further information see subsection \ref{subsecthree} within this section. \subsection{One} \subsection{Two} \subsection{Three}\label{subsecthree}  \end{document}   Usually gives (without the stars):  1 This is my section For further information see subsection **1.3** within this section.   But I want:  1 This is my section For further information see subsection **3** within this section.   Is that possible?  [Edit] To make it more clear: I am looking for a command that works like \ref, but prints (the arabic number of) the value of the subsection counter at the position of the \label.  ======================= == Solution in LaTeX ==  There is another solution below. This is a different solution I came up with  (I cannot post an answer to my own question, so I put it here):  \documentclass{article}  \newcommand{\labelsubseccounter}[1]{     \renewcommand\thesubsection{\arabic{subsection}}     \addtocounter{subsection}{-1}     \refstepcounter{subsection}     \label{#1}     \renewcommand\thesubsection{\thesection.\arabic{subsection}} }  \begin{document}  \section{This is my section} For further information see subsection \ref{subsecthree} within this section,  which is called \ref{onepointthree}, not \ref{onepointfour}. \subsection{One} \subsection{Two} \subsection{Three}\label{onepointthree}\labelsubseccounter{subsecthree} \subsection{Four}\label{onepointfour}  \end{document}   (I would like to insert the compiled code, but don't know how, sorry) Difference between standard beta and unstandard beta distributions? In superluminal phase velocities, what is it that is traveling faster than light? I understand that information cannot be transmitted at a velocity greater than speed of light. I think of this in terms of the radio broadcast: the station sends out carrier frequencies $\omega_c$ but the actual content is carried in the modulated wave, the sidebands $\omega_c\pm\omega_m$. The modulation envelop has its group velocity and this is the speed at which information is being transmitted. We also know, for example, that x-rays in glass have a phase velocity which is greater than the speed of light in vacuum.   My question is, what exactly is it that is travelling faster than the speed of light?    EDIT: I know it couldn't be anything physical as its superluminal. My problem is, what is it that has absolutely no information content yet we associate a velocity with it. How can I reliably get the operating system's name? Solutions to $a+b+c=12$, $a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}_0$ Let $a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}_0$. If $a+b+c=12$, how many solutions $(a,b,c)$ satisfy the equation?   Is the answer:      $729$ Is there a point of beating Vault of Glass raid on Hard after finishing on Normal? Given a Java InputStream, how can I determine the current offset in the stream? Nvidia graphics card no longer works in Windows 10 (error: Code 43) but works in Ubuntu What are the criteria for questions to be selected for Hot Network Questions? Converting string into datetime Interpretation of simple predictions to odds ratios in logistic regression I'm somewhat new to using logistic regression, and a bit confused by a discrepancy between  my interpretations of the following values which I thought would be the same:    exponentiated beta values  predicted probability of the outcome using beta values.    Here is a simplified version of the model I am using, where undernutrition and insurance are both binary, and wealth is continuous:  Under.Nutrition ~ insurance + wealth   My (actual) model returns an exponentiated beta value of .8 for insurance, which I would interpret as:     "The probability of being undernourished for an insured individual is .8 times the probability of being undernourished for an uninsured individual."   However, when I calculate the difference in probabilities for individuals by putting in values of 0 and 1 into the insurance variable and the mean value for wealth, the difference in undernutrition is only .04. That is calculated as follows:   Probability Undernourished = exp(β0 + β1*Insurance + β2*Wealth) /                              (1+exp(β0 + β1*Insurance + β2*wealth))   I would really appreciate it if someone could explain why these values are different, and what a better interpretation (particularly for the second value) might be.     Further Clarification Edits As I understand it, the probability of being under-nourished for an uninsured person (where B1 corresponds to insurance) is:  Prob(Unins) = exp(β0 + β1*0 + β2*Wealth) /               (1+exp(β0 + β1*0+ β2*wealth))   While the Probability of being under-nourished for an insured person is:  Prob(Ins)= exp(β0 + β1*1 + β2*Wealth) /            (1+exp(β0 + β1*1+ β2*wealth))   The odds of being undernourished for an uninsured person compared to an insured person is:  exp(B1)   Is there a way to translate between these values (mathematically)? I'm still a bit confused by this equation (where I should probably be a different value on the RHS):  Prob(Ins) - Prob(Unins) != exp(B)   In layman's terms, the question is why doesn't insuring an individual change their probability of being under-nourished as much as the odds ratio indicates it does?  In my data, Prob(Ins) - Prob(Unins) = .04, where the exponentiated beta value is .8 (so why is the difference not .2?)