Hyperref boxes around links ARE MISSING in TeXShop
no border around hyperlinks with hyperref
This plant was found growing in Germany. I have never seen it before, reverse Google image search did not help either. Can you help me identify what type of plant this is?      Thanks, looks like it is something like this:    Related question: Java multiline string What does the 'cosmological constant' represent? Newtons theory of gravity involves a gravitational constant $G$, however one does not refer to it directly, we speak instead of gravity or the force of gravity.   Now Einsteins introduced a  in his equation for GR, and ever since it's been referred to as such; however, this usage seems strange to me, given the above parallel; it seems to me we ought to be referring to something physical, which can then be quantified and whose quantification involves the cosmological constant.   Does the cosmological constant then refer to a cosmological force? A force that is, contra gravity, repulsive? And which is even weaker than gravity, kicking in on the scale of galaxies rather than solar systems? How does java do modulus calculations with negative numbers? Examples:        Why, I'd love to.   Why, of course!      I get the concept of starting a sentence with a word not completely related to the overall response, but this one seems to be a particularly odd choice&nbsp;— is there any semantic meaning I'm missing? I'm not a native English speaker. I am having difficulty with some words. Could anyone please tell me if there's any difference between the above mentioned short sentences, as I'm a little confused. What we've gelost — why doesn't English use the prefix "ge-"? The Germanic languages that I'm familiar with all use a prefix similar to ge- on past participles:  German: Ich habe mir den Fuß gebrochen. Dutch: Ik heb mijn voet gebroken.  But English doesn't do this at all:  English: I've broken my foot.  Where did this prefix come from? Did English ever have the ge- past participle prefix? If so, why was it lost? The question says to solve this equation: $(z+1)^5 = z^5$  I did. Just want to find out if I did it properly and if my run-around logic makes sense.  First I begin my writing the equations as:  $$ (z+1)^5 = z^5$$ $$ \mathbf{e}^{5 \mathbf{Log}(z+1)} = \mathbf{e}^{5 \mathbf{Log}(z)} $$ So $$  \mathbf{Log}(z+1) = \ln|z+1| + \mathbf{Arg}(z+1)i $$   $$  \mathbf{Log}(z) = \ln|z| + \mathbf{Arg}(z)i $$   Now, because the natural logarithm is one-to-one, I write:  $$ \ln |z| = \ln |z+1| \Rightarrow |z| = |z+1|$$   So assign $ z = a +bi$   So that $|z| = \sqrt{a^2 +b^2} = |z+1| = \sqrt{(a+1)^2 +b^2} \Rightarrow a^2 +b^2 = (a+1)^2 +b^2 \Rightarrow a^2 = (a+1)^2 \Rightarrow a = -\frac12 $  So, $z = -\frac12 + bi$ and $z+1 = \frac12 + bi$ for some $b \in \mathbb R$  Now to find $b$  $$ \mathbf{Arg}(z+1) = \mathbf{Arg}(z)$$ $$ \tan^{-1} \frac{b}{\frac12} = \pi - \tan^{-1}\frac{b}{-\frac12}$$  I have a feeling this last part isn't quite right, so I just want to find out if I'm approaching this question properly?  Ultimately, I get $ z = -\frac12$ which upon inspection...is wrong... Travel in schengen countries without carrying passport for non EU citizen Symbols instead of numbers as footnote markers How can I make LaTeX use symbols (*, †, ‡, and so on) instead of numbers to mark footnotes?  (The numbers are confusing because I use superscripted numbers for citations.) Did the Big Bang happen at a point? How do I use Linq to obtain a unique list of properties from a list of objects? I'm trying to use Linq to return a list of ids given a list of objects where the id is a property. I'd like to be able to do this without looping through each object and pulling out the unique ids that I find.  I have a list of objects of type MyClass and one of the properties of this class is an ID.  public class MyClass {   public int ID { get; set; } }   What I want to do is write a Linq query to return me a list of those Ids  How do I do that given an IList&lt;MyClass&gt; such that it returns an IEnumerable&lt;int&gt; of the ids?  I'm sure it must be possible to do it in one or two lines using Linq rather than looping through each item in the MyClass list and adding the unique values into a list.  Any help in creating an elegant solution would be much appreciated! Inequality about infinite cardinals The following is a question I'm interested in solving:    The idea is to solve it without using AC. As @Asaf Karagila pointed out in the comment section:  "Even if $\kappa$ is an infinite cardinal, you can't assume that $\kappa \geq \omega$ without using AC".  I am still trying to think this through: My reasoning being, that as $\kappa &gt; n \forall n \in \omega$, then $\kappa \geq \sup\{n:n\in \omega\}=\omega$ as $\omega$ is a limit ordinal.  Where does my reasoning fail? And also, a detailed solution would be very appreciated. Mid 2012 MBP shuts down claiming no power with charge at 30% or 40% or more How do you use a variable in a regular expression? plist or sqlite How do I log into my Linux laptop if I have forgotten both the username and password? How to divide the money based on the below conditions? How to limit zoom level in OpenLayers 2.x I would like to have only 3 levels of zoom available (from level 6 to level 8).  demolayer2 = new OpenLayers.Layer.WMS( "abc...","http://localhost:8080/geoserver/gwc/service/wms", {layers: 'def...', transparent:"true", format: 'image/png', numZoomLevels: 3, minZoomLevel: 6 },{isBaseLayer:false},  { tileSize: new OpenLayers.Size(256,256)});  map.addLayer(demolayer2);   map.addControl(new OpenLayers.Control.LayerSwitcher({'div':OpenLayers.Util.getElement('layerswitcher')}));  map.zoomToExtent(new OpenLayers.Bounds(-4.601615515076983,39.8769407866263,-3.0527184873294764,41.16710732525929)); It would be nice to allow users to mark a change in an answer (or question) as minor (e.g. for a simple spelling or grammar correction). A change marked as minor wouldn't push the question on top of the list of questions on the home page or in the feeds. It wouldn't trigger any notification. This could be implemented with a "Minor change" checkbox when editing an entry (a la Confluence). What do you think?