How to avoid Number Format Exception in java?
What is a NumberFormatException and how can I fix it?
How do you find all subclasses of a given class in Java? How does one go about and try to find all subclasses of a given class (or all implementors of a given interface) in Java? As of now, I have a method to do this, but I find it quite inefficient (to say the least). The method is:    Get a list of all class names that exist on the class path Load each class and test to see if it is a subclass or implementor of the desired class or interface   In Eclipse, there is a nice feature called the Type Hierarchy that manages to show this quite efficiently. How does one go about and do it programmatically? Empty drives show 2 GB used, Explorer shows nothing I have 4 drives in Windows: C:, D:, E: and F:. Except C:, all of them are empty.    Suddenly it shows up to 2 GB space used – even when there are no files.     [  When I format the drives, it's fine for a while until it shows used space again.  I use Windows 8.1 Pro 64 Bit. Catalina not allowing to change read/write permissions despite having SIP disabled Currently Running: macOS Catalina 10.15.1 Issue: Ever since I upgraded to Catalina, macOS is not allowing me to change read and write permissions on system protected files, hence, I am not able to tweak the system as per my likes and dislikes. Steps Tried To Solve The Issue: SIP, always remains . So, no question arises regarding any conflict with system integrity protection. I have also tried to force change the permissions on the system files I want to edit using certain brute force commands, which I can't recall the name of, right now. But, I have tried. As of now, I am still unable to change read and write permissions on system protected files and resources. After using gdalwarp to project and align-to-grid (via -tap) a number of rasters I noticed that the output rasters were significantly larger than the original rasters. A fairly thorough web search turned up :  Frank Warmerdam explained the reason: &quot;On careful review, the difference in the file in question is because gdal_translate uses the TIFFWriteScanline() interface to write the output file from within GTiffDataset::CreateCopy?(), and this only writes as much of the final 'strip' of the file as is required to complete image area. But gdalwarp goes through the blockio interface which writes the complete final strip, even the portion that falls off the end of the file.&quot;  This Trac issue is ~7 years old, however, and I know some changes to the GDAL utilities, including gdalwarp have been made since. I'd like to know if the above reasoning still holds and if the file size inflation I'm seeing is &quot;normal.&quot; The word &quot;normal&quot; here might be taken to mean unsurprising or expected but, more importantly: is there anything that can be done to mitigate the effects i.e. reduce the output raster file size? Below is a table of the file size inflation I'm experiencing. Input File Size (bytes)     Output File Size (bytes)    Inflation 1437380431                  1698334217                   18% 1428001178                  1698334433                   19%   41683165                   137036637                  228%  The input TIFF files were created in ArcGIS and thus have external Worldfiles, XML and DBF files but these do not make up the difference in file size. Here is a sample gdalwarp call as I've used it in all of these cases; the actual execution was handled by a Python subprocess (subprocess.Popen): $ gdalwarp -tap -tr 30 30 -t_srs &quot;+proj=aea +lat_1=20 +lat_2=60 +lat_0=40 +lon_0=-96 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +ellps=GRS80 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs&quot; -co &quot;COMPRESS=LZW&quot; input_file.tif output_file.tif  I understand that in rare cases compression makes a larger file, but the effect is the same without the LZW compression. The ratios in the table are with LZW compression. block certain dangerous commands? A bit of background, I am doing research in atmospheric physics and detection systems  Recently, I received a paper submission back with revisions suggested by a couple of reviewers.  For the most part, the revisions were definitely constructive, justified and most importantly, helpful.    That is, except on one particular crucial aspect of the paper where both reviewers made suggestions, that they labelled as critical for the paper's success.  However, the suggestions were directly opposite.  i.e. Both suggestions are mutually exclusive, but equally feasible.    What is an effective means to address this conflict?  I have spoken to my academic supervisor and he is not sure how to proceed either and we have double checked and both suggested paths are feasible. Neural Network: MLP for regression with 3 continuous features, 1 categorical I am starting to study Neural Network. I want to build a MLP where I will feed it:   3 features which are continuous one feature which is categorical (48 classes)   How can I do this?  Before adding the categorical feature, I was using 'relu' activation function and 'lbfgs' as a solver in MLPRegrssor in sklearn.  I was wondering: how can I integrate this variable into the network? Should I do one-hot encoding? Should I keep relu as activation function or should I try sigmoid, softmax or something like that? I found the following blog title without a question mark from :     How to ease Afghanistan’s progress in cricket   Is it grammatical, if we don't put question mark in questions of titles? I think this blog title should have been like this:     How to ease Afghanistan’s progress in cricket?   I also found the following blog title from  without a question mark:     Election rigging 101: How to steal a mandate   However, I found a question mark from other blog title of :     Elections 101: What is the ECP and what does it do on election day? According to ,  The collection of all algebraic objects of a given type will usually be a proper class. Examples include the class of all groups, the class of all vector spaces, and many others. In category theory, a category whose collection of objects forms a proper class (or whose collection of morphisms forms a proper class) is called a large category.  I am aware of Russell's Paradox, which explains why not everything is a set, but how can we show the collection of all groups is a proper class? Turn off autocomplete in PhpStorm What’s the real-world origin of the name Azor Ahai? Azor Ahai is some mythical hero, who may or may not coincide with other mythical heros that are supposed to be born and save us from the eternal night (which is dark and full of terrors, if we are to believe Melisandre).  But I'm interested in the origins of the name, here, in our world. More specifically because in Hebrew "Azor Ahai" means (albeit ungrammatically) "Help my brothers", or if you transliterate it differently you'd get "The Living Help".   Since writers often take meaningful names to be terms from other languages (and mangle them a bit), I can't help but wonder Did GRRM reveal the origin of the name "Azor Ahai" at some point? If all motion is relative, how does light have a finite speed? I've often heard that Einstein shattered the notion of absolute motion (i.e. all things move relative to one another) and that he established the speed of light as being absolute. That sounds paradoxical to me; I cannot understand how the two concepts can be reconciled.  Before going further, I'd like to say: 1) Over the years, I've seen many layman's explanations on these topics (including the nice YouTube video by Vsauce, ). I understand everything that's said (or, at least, I think I do). Just nothing I've found seems to address this apparent contradiction. 2) More recently, I've tried to find the answer on my own. That includes searching the posts on this site. Some come close (), but nothing I've been able to find seems address specifically what I'm asking.  Back to the question: Relativity shows us that there is no universal frame of reference by which to judge motion, so object A might be reckoned as moving at 10&nbsp;m/s relative to object B or as stationary relative to object C. This is fine for me. I can grasp that the universe has no intrinsic coordinate system, that we only think that way on Earth because we have the ground to move over.  Then there's the speed of light (in a vacuum). The speed of light is the ultimate "speed limit," it's often said. But if there is no universal frame of reference, how can there be any such speed? The very idea only make sense if there is a universal frame.   If one object is moving (uniformly) at 60%&nbsp;c and another object is also moving at 60%&nbsp;c, but in the exact opposite direct, then from the perspective of either one (if they could still see each other) the other would appear to violate that speed limit. All these spacetime bending consequences used to explain why nothing can move past this speed only seems to enshrine the concept that there is some ultimate speed standard. If there is only relative speed, then the concept of light having a specific speed in the vacuum should be a nonsensical one since it having speed (x m/s) would only make sense when measured against some other body.   Since I was very young, it has always sounded to me like motion is only mostly relative, that until you get close to the speed of light, the effects of an absolute frame of reference are negligible. Perhaps that there is an actual fabric of space which everything moves relative to, which is why there is something to expand between galaxies (faster than light can propagate) in the metric expansion of space. Growing up, I always thought this would just start makes sense with time. Now I'm up to a first year (college) level in physics, I even know basic calculus, yet I'm still hopelessly confused.  EDIT:  Thank you to whoever suggested this may be a duplicate of . It and others are very much related and at least partially answer my question. Unfortunately, explaining that distances become shorter and time becomes slower as a way to stop you from exceeding the speed of light does not explain how that speed is not an absolute.  By my reckoning, if all speed is relative, then no matter how fast you go light should always race away from you at the same apparent speed. I.e. there should be no speed limit. For there to be a speed which you cannot exceed or you would catch up (and make time irrelevant) requires the very concept of some external speed by which light can travel and nothing else can reach - thus my logical paradox continues unabated. In C++, what is the purpose of the scope resolution operator when used without a scope? For instance:  ::foo(); Rstudio is duplicating commands in the command line When editing really long code blocks (which should definitely be refactored anyway, but that's beyond the scope of this question), I often long for the ability to collapse statement blocks like one can collapse function blocks.  That is to say, it would be great if the minus icon appeared on the code outline for everything enclosed in braces.  It seems to appear for functions, classes, regions, namespaces, usings, but not for conditional or iterative blocks.  It would be fantastic if I could collapse things like ifs, switches, foreaches, that kind of thing!  Googling into that a bit, I discovered that apparently C++ outlining in VS allows this but C# outlining in VS does not.  I don't really get why.  Even notepad++ will so these collapses if I select the C# formatting, so I don't get why Visual Studio doesn't.  Does anyone know of a VS2008 add-in that will enable this behavior?  Or some sort of hidden setting for it?  Edited to add: inserting regions is of course an option and it did already occur to me, but quite frankly, I shouldn't have to wrap things in a region that are already wrapped in braces... if I was going to edit the existing code, I would just refactor it to have better separation of concern anyway. ("wrapping" with new methods instead of regions ;) Alternate moves, first one to roll a 6 wins: what's the probability of winning? I have seen lots of UI designer nowadays including this kind of illustration i want to know the name of this style so that i can also learn and try this in my designs. How to prevent SIGPIPEs (or handle them properly) Is there a difference between “?!” and “!?”? Got this problem from a friend and would like some pointers if anyone has any.  Fill an $n \times n$ matrix with the symbols $\{a,b,c,d\}$ subject to the following:     Only the symbol $a$ appears to the left or above an $a$    Only the symbol $b$ appears to the right or above a $b$    Only the symbol $c$ appears to the left or below a $c$    Only the symbol $d$ appears to the right or below a $d$     Here are some examples of a valid fillings: $$\left( \begin{matrix} a &amp; a &amp; b  &amp; b \\ a &amp; a &amp; b &amp; b \\ c &amp; c &amp; c &amp; d \\  c &amp; c &amp; c &amp; d  \end{matrix}\right) $$  $$\left( \begin{matrix} a &amp; a &amp; a  &amp; a &amp; a &amp; b  &amp; b \\ a &amp; a &amp; a  &amp; a &amp; a &amp; b  &amp; b \\ a &amp; a &amp; a &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d \\  a &amp; a &amp; a &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d\\a &amp; a &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d\\c &amp; c &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d\\  c &amp; c &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d &amp; d  \end{matrix} \right) $$  What I have done: We'll it is clear to me that the $a$'s (for example) make up a sort of Young Diagram just by the property above. But there is more to the problem than that. If your YT for $a$ is just a square, then you might have a reversed (right justified) YT available to place for the $b$'s. Details like this seem to make this a tricky problem for me. I am intrigued by this problem and I just thought I'd share it here in case there is some easy way to do this counting problem that I've never heard of.  Thanks,