How to "protect" a folder from Windows Media Player (preventing it from messing up album covers)
Windows Media Player 12 shows wrong cover art when playing
How do I make my rim brakes stop squealing? My rear rim brakes are squeaking loudly. I don't know what the problem is, but I am sure it has nothing to do with rain because it happens all the time even if it is dry.  Anybody have an idea what could be problem and how to solve it? It makes the rear brakes kind of useless, because if I use them I will scare the people or drivers around me. What does "...from nonmagical attacks not made with silvered weapons" mean? How do I stop friends from getting notifications about what I do on Facebook? Friends and family (who are not in my Close Friends group) are getting notifications when I post or like something on Facebook. How do I stop this? How to convert image of map into vector format? What is the best way to flatten a linked list with lists as values? error: file '/grub/i386-pc/normal.mod' not found. grub rescue&gt;   What can I do? I just sit and stare at it.   I found my old netbook (Dell Inspiron 1010) which I have not used for about four years. I replaced Windows XP with Ubuntu 12.10. I used my bootable USB drive. I installed and rebooted. I got the message that normal.mod is not found.   What should I do? Type exit, reboot, or quit? Should I re-install? Capturing SOAP requests to an ASP.NET ASMX web service BBWC: in theory a good idea but has one ever saved your data? I'm familiar with what a BBWC (Battery-backed write cache) is intended to do - and previously used them in my servers even with good UPS. There are obvously failures it does not provide protection for. I'm curious to understand whether it actually offers any real benefit in practice.  (NB I'm specifically looking for responses from people who have BBWC and had crashes/failures and whether the BBWC helped recovery or not)  Update  After the feedback here, I'm increasingly skeptical as whether a BBWC adds any value.  To have any confidence about data integrity, the filesystem MUST know when data has been committed to non-volatile storage (not necessarily the disk - a point I'll come back to). It's worth noting that a lot of disks lie about when data has been committed to the disk (). While it seems reasonable to assume that disabling the on-disk cache might make the disks more honest, there's still no guarantee that this is the case either.  Due to the typcally large buffers in a BBWC, a barrier can require significantly more data to be commited to disk therefore causing delays on writes: the general advice is to disable barriers when using a non-volatile write back cache (and to disable on-disk caching). However this would appear to undermine the integrity of the write operation - just because more data is maintained in non-volatile storage does not mean that it will be more consistent. Indeed, arguably without demarcation between logical transactions there seems to be less opportunity to ensure consistency than otherwise.   If the BBWC were to acknowledge barriers at the point the data enters it's non-volatile storage (rather than being committed to disk) then it would appear to satisfy the data integrity requirement without a performance penalty - implying that barriers should still be enabled. However since these devices generally exhibit behaviour consistent with flushing the data to the physical device (significantly slower with barriers) and the widespread advice to disable barriers, they cannot therefore be behaving in this way. WHY NOT?  If the I/O in the OS is modelled as a series of streams then there is some scope to minimise the blocking effect of a write barrier when write caching is managed by the OS - since at this level only the logical transaction (a single stream) needs to be committed. On the other hand, a BBWC with no knowledge of which bits of data make up the transaction would have to commit its entire cache to disk. Whether the kernel/filesystems actually implement this in practice would require a lot more effort than I'm wiling to invest at the moment.  A combination of disks telling fibs about what has been committed and sudden loss of power undoubtedly leads to corruption - and with a Journalling or log structured filesystem which don't do a full fsck after an outage its unlikely that the corruption will be detected let alone an attempt made to repair it.   In terms of the modes of failure, in my experience most sudden power outages occur because of loss of mains power (easily mitigated with a UPS and managed shutdown). People pulling the wrong cable out of rack implies poor datacentre hygene (labelling and cable management). There are some types of sudden power loss event which are not prevented by a UPS - failure in the PSU or VRM a BBWC with barriers would provide data integrity in the event of a failure here, however how common are such events? Very rare judging by the lack of responses here.   Certainly moving the fault tolerance higher in the stack is significantly more expensive the a BBWC - however implementing a server as a cluster has lots of other benefits for performance and availability.  An alternative way to mitigate the impact of sudden power loss would be to implement a SAN - AoE makes this a practical proposition (I don't really see the point in iSCSI) but again there's a higher cost. Reading ODBC connection using QGIS? I have a co-worker who manages a large MS Access database that contains X &amp; Y fields for various locations he tracks.  We have previously exported the data to CSV and used the QGIS Delimited Text Plugin to plot the locations.  We would now like to be plot this data directly in QGIS by connecting to the MS Access db via an ODBC connection (as opposed to export to CSV).   Can QGIS consume the data from the ODBC connection to plot the X-Y locations? Can it be "live linked" to the ODBC connection so that when a project is re-opened, the layer "replots" all old and newly added locations dynamically (as opposed to exporting to shapefile, which would create a snapshot in time)? Can you create tabular ODBC connections that can be joined to spatial tables within QGIS?   You can do all of this in ArcGIS ("Add XY Data" tool), so it would be great if this capability existed in QGIS. I just cannot find anywhere that mentions its existence.  I am not planning to move to a spatial database.  As a GIS person myself, yes I know that it makes sense to move to a spatial database, and yes I have used PostGIS to manage this kind of data.  But these are not options right now.  The user is not a GIS person nor wants to be, and he manages his own database in MS Access and that will not change.  I am and am pulling him kicking and screaming into the GIS world and want to make it easy as possible.  He can live with exporting to CSV, I was just hoping there is a better solution USING ODBC FOR MS ACCESS and displaying the XY data in QGIS. How to print "$" in here-document How can I echo "$" in a here-doc in bash?  For example, I want to have a file with the content on remote server like $ABC=home_dir.  $ ssh hostname sudo -s &lt;&lt;EOF echo "$ABC=home_dir" &gt; file EOF   But it would be treated as a variable. How can I print a literal $? Verbatim environment that can break long lines? I want to generate a PDF of user-submitted text using LaTeX. To handle crazy user input, I first thought about using the verbatim package, but of course it doesn't break up too long lines. Is there some package that works similar to verbatim (i.e., accept any input) but formats the text nicely? Difference between == and === in JavaScript I have a small Problem that occurs from time to time.   Sometimes, when I copy things or when I put an object from the symbol library on my page, the whole file gets messed up. The screenshot shows it. I make the graphic on the right, Illustrator the ones on the left.   I have pixel snapping checked. Is there a way to tell Illustrator to align everything to pixels no matter what? Can I downgrade to Mavericks after installing Yosemite (beta/developer preview)? I have installed the developer preview for Yosemite.  Huge mistake. Everything in my workspace is broken.  I don't have any sort of backup image. I was wondering if I could re-download Mavericks and run the installer - would that effectively downgrade me back to Mavericks? Trying to locate a file, how can I search the entire hard drive for a file? Why the $(n+1)$th prime number cannot exceed the smallest prime divisor of $p_1\dotsc p_n + 1$ Let $p_n$ be the $n$th prime number in its natural order. We want to show that  $$p_{n+1} \leq p_1\dotsc p_n + 1 \tag{1}$$  I know $p_1\dotsc p_n + 1 &gt; 1$, so it has at least one prime divisor, but the text says that $p_{n+1}$ cannot exceed the smallest of these divisors, but I cannot understand why, especially when I imagine $p_{n+1}$ being very large. Although some examples confirm that this statement is true, I cannot make a connection as to why the $n+1$ prime number cannot exceed the smallest prime divisor. Once this has been shown to be true, $(1)$ immediately follows. Why is saltatory conduction in myelinated axons faster than continuous conduction in unmyelinated axons? Writing a string array to text file separated by new line character Asymptotes in a plot I'm using TikZ to plotting some functions for a document. For example, I want to plot 1/(x+1). So I did something like this:  \begin{tikzpicture}[&gt;=stealth,x=3mm,y=3mm] \draw (0,5) node[above]{\fimg $y=f(x+1)=\dfrac{1}{x+1}$}; \clip (-5,-5) rectangle (5,5); \ejes[1]{-4}{4}{-4}{4} \draw[samples=100] plot(\x,{1/(\x+1)}); \end{tikzpicture}   where \ejes[style]{xmin}{xmax}{ymin}{ymax} is command, that I have defined before to draw the axes (join with \fimg). My expected output for the code below was just the function, but I get this:    So, TikZ automagically put the vertical asymptote at x=-1. That isn't a bad thing, but now I want to have some control over it. For example I want dotted lines for vertical asymptotes. How can I do that? Does "minor revision" mean "accepted with minor revision"? I just received a decision letter from a journal editor (after three rounds of major revision). The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. Is this normal? Can I assume that this basically means "acceptance with minor revision"? Thanks for your insight and sharing.