Reading txt file in bash line by line, without knowing its name
How to iterate over arguments in a Bash script
Managing Metered Connections on OSX How to enable linking floating point library in TurboC? Can i use the /testfor command to check for certain words in chat? Should words be capitalized for being religious terms? While googling about whether "atheist" should be capitalized, and skimming past posts by people blogging about atheism rather than about English grammar, I came across    It says     [Capitalize] Religions and religious terms       Examples:      Catholicism, Hinduism, Buddha, the Bible, Christian, the Ten   Commandments, Baptist church, Mt. Zion Methodist Church      NOTE: Do not capitalize the following:       Examples:      church, communion, atheist, agnostic, spirituality   but I don't recall hearing of such a prescription before. Wouldn't most of the examples listed be capitalized because they're proper nouns? Are there good examples of words being capitalized solely because they're religious terms?  I'm mainly interested in modern English, rather than days of past where a lot more words were capitalized than they are nowadays.  Somewhat related:  - use "God" when referring to the name of the god of Judaism and Christianity (a proper noun), but "god" when referring to the general concept of a deity (common noun). Can I create script tag by jQuery? Error Message:      "A reboot is pending. Please restart before starting Visual Studio".    I installed Visual Studio (Visual Basic 2015 and SQL 2015) and after what looked like a successful install I then got the "Reboot" window.   Not expecting it I had a bunch of things open. So I closed a bunch a bunch of things, and did the reboot myself.   Now I cannot run Visual Basic because it ONLY gives me the above error message in the pop-up window. It won't even let me do a re-install.   All it does is keep giving me the above error message.   If you have any advice that's better than a complete uninstall/reinstall I'm sure everyone in my situation would benefit from it.  How can I resolve this issue? What's the subject of "There is my biscuit!" ? And how about "There is one biscuit left"? What's the subject, grammatically speaking, of these sentences?   There is my biscuit! My biscuit is there! There is one biscuit left.   I don't really know how to analyze these. The following observations seem to be relevant, though:   The verb to be doesn't take an object. In the first two sentences, there is a demonstrative pronoun. It is therefore potentially a subject, I think. I don't know what part of speech is taken by there in the third sentence. In favour of reading my biscuit and one biscuit as the subjects is that if there were more than one biscuit then, in each case, the verb would become plural (There are my biscuits! etc.) In favour of reading one biscuit as the subject of the third sentence is that if we recast it as (the slightly unidiomatic) There remains one biscuit, it seems that one biscuit would have to be the subject.   All of this leads me tentatively towards thinking that my biscuit and one biscuit are the subjects here, but I'm not totally confident about this.  One other possibility: since to be doesn't take an object, does that mean it can have two subjects? In I am he, presumably both I and he are subjects, if neither is an object? The following is a well-known result in functional analysis:     If the vector space $X$ is finite dimensional, all norms are equivalent.     Here is the standard proof in one textbook. First, pick a norm for $X$, say  $$\|x\|_1=\sum_{i=1}^n|\alpha_i|$$ where $x=\sum_{i=1}^n\alpha_ix_i$, and $(x_i)_{i=1}^n$ is a basis for $X$. Then show that every norm for $X$ is equivalent to $\|\cdot\|_1$, i.e.,  $$c\|x\|\leq\|x\|_1\leq C\|x\|.$$ For the first inequality, one can easily get $c$ by triangle inequality for the norm. For the second inequality, instead of constructing $C$, the  is applied to construct a contradiction.   The strategies for proving these two inequalities are so different. Here is my question,      Can one prove this theorem without Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem?   UPDATE:     Is the converse of the theorem true? In other words, if all norms for a vector space $X$ are equivalent, then can one conclude that $X$ is of finite dimension? I have a strange issue with Windows 10  When I open .nef files they load fine. However after a second or two the contrast changes noticeably. I tried Windows 10 Photos and Picasa Image Viewer.   What am I trying to accomplish? I just want to open files quickly to check for focus and composition before importing into Lightroom  Lightroom does not have this issue   Here is the example opening with Windows 10 Photos    And here is after a second when it 'fully' loads    Picasa Photo Viewer after it loads a bit. It initially opens fine but then it goes all purple Let $F,G,H$ be groups such that $F\trianglelefteq G \trianglelefteq H$.  I am asked whether we necessarily have $F\trianglelefteq H$. I think the answer is no but I cannot find any counterexample with usual groups. Is there a simple case where this property is not true? What is the best way to give a C# auto-property an initial value? I need your help with references. I have 1 main reference section, and I want to include a second list of references as an appendix. For the main reference I use:  \newpage  \bibliographystyle{plainnat}  \bibliography{library}   The problem is that I don't know how to include the second list using a different bib file, and then calling the function \nocite{*} to show every sources inside the file.   I have the appendix part workout. I need your help to design the function to call the second bibliography, and that does't interfere with the main reference:   \newpage  \appendix  \section{Other Sources} \label{app:ReferencesB}   In addition, I will prefer that the word References is not shown after Other Sources.  Thank you so much!! The full prophecy by Trelawney, the part my question is about in bold:     "The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord approaches ... born to those who  have thrice defied him, born as the seventh month dies ... and the Dark Lord will mark him as his equal, but he will have power the Dark Lord knows not ... and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live while the other survives ... the one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord will be born as the seventh month dies ..."    – Sybill Trelawney (to Dumbledore)    I am interpreting      for neither can live while the other survives   as: Harry can't live while Voldemort survives and vice versa. But why? It clearly worked until the end of book 7. One could argue with Dumbledore's thery of the self-fulfilling prophecy. But clearly Voldemort was smart enough to see that there was no mechanism that would kill him just because Harry stayed alive.    and either must die at the hand of the other    Again: Why? If somebody else destroyed all Horcruxes and then killed Harry, Voldemort would be just as vulnerable and could be killed by anyone. On the other hand, Harry could have been killed by anyone - his mum's protection transferred to Voldemort by Harry's blood was only helping against Voldemort.  I guess that I am interpreting this part of the prophecy in the wrong way or maybe there is an alternate, less obvious and more tricky one. So my question is: What exactly does the highlighted part of Trelawney's prophecy state? Indefinite Integral with "sin" and "cos": $\int\frac{3\sin(x) + 2\cos(x)}{2\sin(x) + 3\cos(x)} \; dx $ How can I get free or trial ExactTarget instance How can I get free or trial ExactTarget instance. I need to do ExactTarget SAML2.0 Single Sign-On connector development, integration and testing. Is there any step by step documentation available so that I can work on ExactTarget SAML2.0 Single Sign-On ? Can I kill an indestructible creature with -X/-X and sufficient damage marked on it? Can I hit a 4/4 indestructible creature with a  (3 damage) and give it -1/-1 with  to kill it? (Does it matter which way around I cast those?)  I read  here and it says, damage is removed in cleanup step, so it should be on the creature still after both spells.     702.12. Indestructible   702.12a Indestructible is a static ability.   702.12b A permanent with indestructible can’t be destroyed. Such permanents aren’t destroyed by lethal damage, and they ignore the state-based action that checks for lethal damage (see rule 704.5g).   702.12c Multiple instances of indestructible on the same permanent are redundant. How to delete pre-installed apps in Catalina? I want to delete the pre-installed apps, like Music, Books, Siri etc. from my iMac running Catalina. How do I do this?  (NOTE:  asks the same thing but was closed as a duplicate of . Annoyingly, the supposed duplicate doesn’t give an obvious answer to the question, and the original was locked can’t be answered, hence a new question. I can’t add an answer to  either) Hi I'm solving some exercise problems in my text : "A Course in Mathematical Statistics".  I'm in the chapter "Point estimation" now, and I want to find a UMVUE of $\theta$ where $X_1 ,...,X_n$ are i.i.d random variables with the p.d.f $f(x; \theta)=\theta e^{-\theta x}, x\gt0$.   I know that $E(X_i)=1/\theta,$ for each $i$, and also have that $\bar{X}$ (or equivalently $\sum_1^n X_i$) is a complete sufficient statistic for $\theta$. But I cannot go any further here. Somebody can help me? Nautilus doesn't launch on Ubuntu How to set environment variable in systemd service? I have an  and I've created my own service. The configuration service at /etc/systemd/system/myservice.service looks like this:  [Unit] Description=My Daemon  [Service] ExecStart=/bin/myforegroundcmd  [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target   Now I want to have an environment variable set for the /bin/myforegroundcmd. How do I do that?