Side-by-side markdown title not so side-by-side
There's something funky about some titles in revision histories here on Meta Stack Exchange
I have two sites that were originally migrated from SPS2003.  It worked well in SharePoint 2007 and even on SharePoint 2010,  however when we migrated it to SharePoint 2013,  the home page throws following errors on the ULS Log.     5/24/2013 09:57:46.62  w3wp.exe (0x0D50)   0x1D24  SharePoint Foundation   Files   ak8dj   High   UserAgent not available, file operations may not be optimized.    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.CreateCobaltStreamContainer(SPFileStreamStore spfs, ILockBytes ilb, Boolean copyOnFirstWrite, Boolean disposeIlb)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.SetInputLockBytes(SPFileInfo&amp; fileInfo, SqlSession session, PrefetchResult prefetchResult)        05/24/2013 09:57:46.62 w3wp.exe (0x0D50)   0x1D24  SharePoint Foundation   Cobalt  ajoii   Medium   Mapping Store error to Cobalt error. [Store Error: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.     at Microsoft.SharePoint.CoordinatedStreamBuffer.SPCoordinatedStreamBufferFactory.CreateFromDocParams(SqlSession session, Guid guidSiteId, Int32 cbContent, Nullable1 parentId, Guid docId, Nullable1 level, SPChunkedArray`1 rgbContent, Byte[] rgbRbsId, Int64 bsn, Byte partition, Int32 pageSize, Boolean bStartFilling)        05/24/2013 09:57:46.62 w3wp.exe (0x0D50)   0x1D24  SharePoint Foundation   Cobalt  aintx   High    Failed in CobaltStream.LockBytes: ErrorException --- Error: Unknown (Win32=0x80004003) --- Error message: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.     at Microsoft.SharePoint.CoordinatedStreamBuffer.SPCoordinatedStreamBufferFactory.CreateFromDocParams(SqlSession session, Guid guidSiteId, Int32 cbContent, Nullable1 parentId, Guid docId, Nullable1 level, SPChunkedArray`1 rgbContent, Byte[] rgbRbsId, Int64 bsn, Byte partition, Int32 pageSize, Boolean bStartFilling)     at         05/24/2013 09:57:46.64 w3wp.exe (0x0D50)   0x1D24  SharePoint Foundation   Files   ak8dj   High    UserAgent not available, file operations may not be optimized.    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.CreateCobaltStreamContainer(SPFileStreamStore spfs, ILockBytes ilb, Boolean copyOnFirstWrite, Boolean disposeIlb)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.SetInputLockBytes(SPFileInfo&amp; fileInfo, SqlSession session, PrefetchResult prefetchResult)     at         05/24/2013 09:57:46.64 w3wp.exe (0x0D50)   0x1D24  SharePoint Foundation   Database    ab1a9   High    Failed to get document content data. System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.     at Microsoft.SharePoint.CoordinatedStreamBuffer.SPCoordinatedStreamBufferFactory.CreateFromDocParams(SqlSession session, Guid guidSiteId, Int32 cbContent, Nullable1 parentId, Guid docId, Nullable1 level, SPChunkedArray`1 rgbContent, Byte[] rgbRbsId, Int64 bsn, Byte partition, Int32 pageSize, Boolean bStartFilling)     at   I could not find any materials related to this on the internet,  I am not even sure if it has to do something with SPS2003 compatibility.  Any help pointers? How do I add this extra partition to my installed Ubuntu system? I started installing Ubuntu by watching a video tutorial about doing a disk partition installation, for that, inside Windows' 7 own disk partitioning tool. After a defrag I cut 100GB that I pretended to use on my Ubuntu installation for a little try out, now, while installing, I never really chose where I wanted Ubuntu to be installed, so I guess it just made a partition by itself of the minimum that the installation tells you it needs.  How can I now give the other 92 GB I had left apart only for that task?  Here's what my partitions look like now.     Here's a df:    And here's the GParted tool un ubuntu: I used following command for port scanning of my machine  nc -zv 192.168.1.1 1-100  but I want to filter only succeeded message from  following output.Hence i used the following command   nc -zv 192.168.1.1 1-100|grep succeeded   But no use, still it shows full output   nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 1 (tcp) failed: Connection refused nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 2 (tcp) failed: Connection refused nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 3 (tcp) failed: Connection refused nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 4 (tcp) failed: Connection refused nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 5 (tcp) failed: Connection refused nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 6 (tcp) failed: Connection refused nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 7 (tcp) failed: Connection refused nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 8 (tcp) failed: Connection refused nc: connect to 192.168.1.1 port 9 (tcp) failed: Connection refused Why are these black dots / spots appearing in my pictures? How could we improve our planned post notice improvements? Megan has written a .  I've seen a bunch of discussion about it on chat - but it feels like having it purely on the blog is a little clunky.  So specifically - what does the MSE community feel about the proposed post notices for closed questions? What's missing, or what should be added? What are some of the lessons we've learnt that could be helpful here? Do we know Snoke predates the Empire? How many times can American Tourist re-enter UK in same 6 month period? How do I create an Excel (.XLS and .XLSX) file in C# without installing Microsoft Office? How can I create an Excel spreadsheet with C# without requiring Excel to be installed on the machine that's running the code? How to evaluate the series $1+\frac34+\frac{3\cdot5}{4\cdot8}+\frac{3\cdot5\cdot7}{4\cdot8\cdot12}+\cdots$ How can I make sure that a certain OLEDB driver is installed when I start my application? I use ADO from Delphi and would like to display a descriptive error message if the driver is missing. The error that's returned from ADO isn't always that user-friendly.  There are probably a nice little function that returns all installed drivers but I haven't found it. I have the following problem:  Let $a, b \in\mathbb{Z}$. Show that $\,\{ ax + by\ :\ x, y \in \mathbb{Z}\} = \{ n \gcd(a,b)\ :\ n\in \mathbb{Z} \}$   I understand that the Bezout's lemma says that $gcd(a,b) = ax +by$, so Im not really how you would go about proving the above, it doesn't really make sense to me. Any help is appreciated1 Parse and Extract Attributes from JSON This post is an expansion of  For many graduated sites (eg Physics), moderators do not want to apply the unilateral close vote in all cases--it is better to let some community votes pile on first.  We only use the unilateral in obvious cases then. This renders the CV queue useless to us. If we &quot;skip&quot; something, we can't get back to it. If we say &quot;do not close&quot;, it's removed from the queue and our community can't see it. If we use &quot;close&quot;, we are using a unilateral mod vote--we don't want to do that. What I propose is a set of &quot;next/previous&quot; buttons, that let us navigate the queues, looking for closeable questions, and coming back to the others later. Thoughts? Update and bounty reason Due to the recent Great Flag Overhaul, mods no longer see close flags in the flag queue. Which means that the only way to get to them is via the review queue 1 Shog's solution is ideal in this case; let mods view the close queue as a list. (In fact, a list similar to the old flag queue -- which shows a list of mods who have seen the post and what mod actions have already been taken -- would be great) On Physics, the majority of the flags that we get are VTC flags. And the community isn't always able to close things on their own, so we have to step in. However, powering through the close queue isn't an option; because &quot;skip&quot;ing a post2 leads to it being dumped into the void (I can't get back to it unless I have a link). Extremely inconvenient. Could the workflow here be improved? 1. The /tools listing for posts with outstanding close votes doesn't work because it doesn't list posts which have been flagged but not VTCd 2. which I may want to take a closer look at later; gotta be careful with the binding votes. How do I install minecraft 1.9 on mac? How to draw Venn diagrams (especially: complements) in LaTeX What I am up to is to write some exercises dealing with logical formulas for my students, like:     And the students should draw these formulas on . At the end of the lesson, I really would like to print the correct answer for them. I found a great resource on a forum thread at , which helped me a lot to make up some Venn diagrams with tikz, but have some problems with visualizing complements, like ~A.  A simple, modified version of the TeX file found on the forum linked above, can be seen below, which produces the following expression:    \documentclass{letter}   \usepackage{tikz}   \def\firstcircle{(90:1.75cm) circle (2.5cm)}   \def\secondcircle{(210:1.75cm) circle (2.5cm)}   \def\thirdcircle{(330:1.75cm) circle (2.5cm)}   \begin{document}     \begin{tikzpicture}       \begin{scope}     \clip \secondcircle;     \fill[cyan] \thirdcircle;       \end{scope}       \begin{scope}     \clip \firstcircle;     \fill[cyan] \thirdcircle;       \end{scope}       \draw \firstcircle node[text=black,above] {$A$};       \draw \secondcircle node [text=black,below left] {$B$};       \draw \thirdcircle node [text=black,below right] {$C$};     \end{tikzpicture}   \end{document}   Which looks like:    Could anyone please help me out plotting/defining some expressions dealing with complements? A nice example could be:    That should look like: (image from )    I do not insist on the red color :)  I would like to use the simplest possible solution, as I would like to mass generate the exercises with the help of . So any suggestion dealing with gnuplot, R or any other opensource packages is welcome. Thank you!    UPDATE (25/01/2011): added details based on answers.  Thank you @Leo Liu, you helped me a lot! I modified a bit the code you suggested to be able to color the area outside of the two circles also (in the H universe), but have no idea how to set a background to that polygon also. The code:  \begin{tikzpicture}[fill=gray] % left hand \scope \clip (-2,-2) rectangle (2,2)       (1,0) circle (1); \fill (0,0) circle (1); \endscope % right hand \scope \clip (-2,-2) rectangle (2,2)       (0,0) circle (1); \fill (1,0) circle (1); \endscope % outline \draw (0,0) circle (1) (0,1)  node [text=black,above] {$A$}       (1,0) circle (1) (1,1)  node [text=black,above] {$B$}       (-2,-2) rectangle (3,2) node [text=black,above] {$H$}; \end{tikzpicture}   And the image generated:    I will also look for even odd rule in the near future which does not make sense for me at the moment but looks really simple and promising! What does `:-` mean in a shell script I saw this in the end of an awesome shell script but I can't understand the login here because I think it's being short-handed for a longer command.  spark ${@:-`cat`}   This apears at the end of . Any ideas?  + Marks for some one who extends it into a full segment of code, even if its slower (Better for explanation) Show the post's comments on the "Suggested Edits" review interface Having recently reviewed a few suggested edits, I've found that not being able to see the comments on the post is hindering my understanding of the context of some edits.  In particular, there have been a few posts where someone has made a substantial edit to a question or answer which significantly alters its meaning. Typically I'd reject that as "too radical", since it can't be known that the new meaning of the post was what the original author intended.  However, in some cases it is clear from the comments that the original author is aware of the intended change, and as such the editor is not in fact misrepresenting the author's intentions. In these cases, it would have been useful to see the comments when making the review decision.  As an example, a common cause of this is when an inexperienced user is asked to clarify their question, and ends up writing a comment that would be better off as an edit to the question (due to length, excess code content, etc), presumably due to lack of awareness that the question can be edited. Often, other users will helpfully edit the question to include the information the OP put in the comment (see ,  and  for examples). In this situation, it is clear that the edit reflects the OP's intentions, but this information is only present in the comments which are not visible in the review interface.  Following is the suggested edit screen showing the suggested edit. It seems indentation is increased and one line is moved a few lines upwards and some empty lines added to increase readability. But it look like an invalid edit since changing the related line may cause alteration on the runtime. So not looks lie a valid edit. Better open the answer and examine it        Checking the Q&amp;A itself reveals that a talk had taken place between the OP and the answerer and revision done by the OP with the permission of the answerer. So it was indeed a valid edit.        In short: is there any particular reason comments are not displayed in the suggested edit review interface? I think it would add useful contextual information when making review decisions, and presumably this would be trivial to implement.  Note: this is not a dupe of , as it does not concern comments posted after the suggested edit. I have an empty file (only zeroes are in it) of size 9,0KB and I need to write another file (with size 1,1KB) to it, but the first file must not lose its size or the rest of its contents. So if the whole file is 00000000000000... now, I need to write second file in it and leave the zeroes as they are. I have tried to use dd, but I haven't succeed - file resizes.  dd if=out/one.img of=out/go.img   Does anybody know how can I do it? Number of triangles formed by $m$ lines If $X$ takes on a Gamma Distribution, how can I find $X^2$, $X^3$, etc?