How to find and move files between certain dates?
How to find files between two dates using "find"?
What is glue stretching? I had a question about dynamic vspaces () and there was a hint I should use a stretchable glue. Searching with Google didn't give me a helpful answer.  I would be glad, if someone can explain it and give me a simple example to understand how it works. Definition of electric charge and proper explanation How can I restore configuration files? Is there a way to set initial state with rigid bodies? Let's say I set up a Rigid Body simulation in Blender (not in GE), and then run the simulation for a number of frames. Is there a way to tell Blender to use the current state and position as the initial state? So that when I go back to frame 1, the rigid bodies stay in the same place they did in frame X.  For instance, if I want a pile of bricks, I first place the bricks in the air and then let them drop down on the ground, coming to rest. When they have come to rest, I want to use that position as the starting position. I can ask any of:     Do you know a breakfast place nearby?   Do you know a nearby breakfast place?   Do you know a good breakfast place?   but I really can't ask:     Do you know a breakfast place good?   Is there a general rule for determining whether an adjective must come before the noun or may come, Spanish-style, after it? SD card not showing files when connected to pc In "Settings" > "SD card &amp; phone storage settings" under "Internal Phone Storage" it lists "Available Space" as 13.78MB.  I'm trying to install an app that is 2.38MB.  Why do I get the "Insufficient storage available" error message?  I clearly have enough space.  If it's relevant, my phone is an LG Optimus V. How to change the background color only for the current page? It turns out that removing a virtual package with apt-get only remove the package itself,  leaving behind the real packages that were installed by it  So how do you remove a virtual package, along with all the real packages that it installs? Just beginning to learn quantum mechanics and my textbook says that all pure eigenstates of the Schrodinger equation ( with a specified potential function) have a zero standard deviation for the expectation values of energy.So every measurement of the energy yields a fixed value. I've also read that pure eigenstates are physically realisable solutions in some situations ( like the infinite potential well). But wouldn't that violate the uncertainty principle? the standard deviation in expectation of energy is zero and hence $$ΔE~Δt=0.$$ Where am I going wrong? Also could someone also give me an insight as to what uncertainty in time even means? I haven't been able to grasp that concept clearly yet. Who should I be damage buffing as Mercy I just started playing Overwatch (played a few games during open beta, but wasn't able to play much). I'm enjoying Mercy, but who (in a group situation) should be getting the damage buff? Additionally, when my team splits up, who should I follow to support? Disable cache for some images Are there any holidays in Middle Earth, except Yule, Lithe, New Year in Gondor and Durin's Day? Energy conservation in General Relativity Algorithms for computing multiplicative order modulo $n$ If I take the $k \in \mathbb{N}$ power of 10 and mod it by a large prime, I notice that the remainders repeat at some point.  For instance $10^k mod~7$ seems to repeat every $8$th value of $k$.  Given $k$ (the power of ten), and a large prime number $p$, how can I compute the size of the cycle?  I tried writing a python script that computes the first instance of a repeat. However, I don't know if this works since a single instance of a repeat may not necessarily mean a full cycle. Are there instances where citing Wikipedia is allowed? For example, suppose you're writing an article about triangles, and you want to include a short proof of Pythagoras' theorem, but you can't quite remember how to derive it, so you pop over to:  and check the proof there. It works mathematically, makes sense and is as far as you can tell, correct, so you include it. Now the proof on Wikipedia doesn't have a citation because probably someone has been taught it and copied it over to Wikipedia, but it's still correct. The only thing you could cite for the proof would be Wikipedia, would a citation be ok or should it just be copied down without a citation?  Edit: Ok, there have been many responses. Most with a firm "no", but some giving the reason: "Just get the proof from a book" since it's so common, but suppose then it wasn't a common proof of something. Maybe it's not very well known or something but suppose there is a small Wikipedia page with the correct mathematical proof. How much effort are people going to go to to find a proof in a book when there's a (correct (which we know, becuase it's maths and we can check it)) proof on Wikipedia? Why is it so bad to say: "I found this proof on Wikipedia, and the maths checks out so it doesn't matter who wrote it, it is correct, but that's where I found it." Or if you do find it somewhere else why not say: "Proof taken from Wikipedia and verified by the proof shown in "Triangles and their properties, Nature, 2014, p113 etc..." I tried to use this for the last part of my table, but I can't get a vertical line at the end. Does anyone know?   \begin{tabular}{|CC|C|C|C|C|C|C|C|C|C|C|}\hline \Tab{Method Based on \\\hline       Radiography\\Magnetic Particle (A.C.)\\ \\Eddy Current\\Dye Penetrants\\ Ultrasonics} &amp; \Tab{ \\\hline \\ Wet \\ Dry \\ \\ \\ \\} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Minute Surface Cracks }~}  \\\hline       N\\ G\\F\\F\\F\\P}  &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Deeper Surface Cracks      }~}  \\\hline            F\\G\\G\\G\\G\\G} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Internal Cracks      }~}  \\\hline            F\\N\\N\\N\\N\\G} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Fatigue Cracks      }~}  \\\hline            P\\G\\G\\N\\G\\G} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Internal Voids      }~}  \\\hline            G\\N\\N\\N\\N\\G}           &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Porosity and Slag in Welds      }~}  \\\hline            G\\N\\N\\P\\N\\F}           &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Thickness      }~}  \\\hline            F\\N\\N\\P\\N\\G} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Stress Corrosion      }~}  \\\hline            F\\G\\F\\N\\G\\F} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Blistering      }~}  \\\hline            P\\N\\N\\N\\N\\F} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Corrosion Pits      }~}  \\\hline            G\\N\\P\\N\\F\\P} \\\hline &amp; \multicolumn{11}{l}{G=Good;F=Fair;P=Poor;N=Not suitable.} \\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{tab:NDETechniques} \end{table}   It comes out like this: I'm currently using an entry-level DSLR with 18-55mm lens and having great trouble trying to creating a blurred background effect in my photos. Now matter what aperture or shutter speed I choose, I'm not able to get it.  There's a general question about , but what specific things can I do to get this effect with an entry-level lens? Did spacetime start with the Big Bang?  I mean, was there any presence of this spacetime we are experiencing now before big bang? And could there be a presence/existence of any other space-time before the big bang? Is this noun used as an adjective? I read this recently in :     At the end of the summit, the French and European officials had   claimed a points victory over the Germans by getting them to agree   more firmly to a target date of January 1st next year to entrust the   European Central Bank (ECB) with the ultimate authority to supervise   the euro zone’s 6,000-odd banks.   "Points" is a plural, and I suppose it doesn't function as a noun in this sentence since it's following the article "a", so is it an adjective adorning "victory"?