How do I skip the "known_host" question the first time I connect to a machine via SSH with public/private keys?
How can I avoid SSH's host verification for known hosts?
Regular Expression: Numeric range Path.Combine for URLs? is handy, but is there a similar function in the .NET framework for ?  I'm looking for syntax like this:  Url.Combine("http://MyUrl.com/", "/Images/Image.jpg")   which would return:  "http://MyUrl.com/Images/Image.jpg" How can I parse dates and convert time zones in Perl? $M= \{ A \in Mat_{2 \times 2}{\mathbb{R}}| \det(A)=1 \}$ is homeomorphic to $S^{1} \times \mathbb{R}^{2}$ Let $\alpha$ be an irrational real number and let $a_j$ be a sequence of rational numbers converging to $\alpha$. Suppose that each $a_j$ is a fraction expressed in lowest terms: $a_j = \alpha_j / \beta_j$. Prove that the $\beta_j$ tend to $\infty$  Attempt: AFSOC that $\beta_j$ does not tend to infinity, then it is bounded by some $M$. We can also find an interval $\alpha \in (k, k+1)$. Let $\epsilon &gt; 0$, $\exists N_0$ such that for all $N &gt; N_0$ we have $|a_N - \alpha|  &lt; \epsilon$. So $|\frac{p_N}{q_N} - \alpha| &lt; \epsilon$. We try to use the fact that $q$ is bounded but fail to derive a contradiction. I do not know how to use the fact that $\alpha$ is between two integers, although it might not be relevant at all.  Ideas? I have seen the options such as a4paper, a5paper, letterpaper, etc... to go in the square brackets after \documentclass, but what I want is 8.25 inches width by 10.75 inches height for one document and 6 inches width by 9 inches height for another one. How is this done? What is the next perfect square of the form 14444... in decimal notation? We know that $12^2 = 144$ and that $38^2 = 1444$. Are there any other perfect squares in the form of $\frac{13}{9} (10^n - 1) + 1$ (i.e. $1$ followed by $n$ $4$'s), and how would we prove it? Give a combinatorial proof: $ n(n+1)2^{n-2} = \sum_{k=1}^{n}k^2\binom{n}{k} $ Find a combinatorial argument for the following binomial identity:   $$n(n+1)2^{n-2} = \sum_{k=1}^{n}k^2\binom{n}{k} .$$   Algebraic proofs can be found at  , and a related identity at  . What is the difference between .pem, .csr, .key and .crt and other such file extensions? I'm new to SSL / TLS and I want to work with the OpenSSL toolkit.  I don't know what .pem and .csr stands for?  I do know that .key is the private key and .crt is the public key. Prove that if $A$ is regular then $\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}(A)) = (\det A)^{n-2} A$ K out of N encryption When electric dipole placed in non uniform electric field, what is the approach to calculate torque acting on it? Can it be zero? How to install folding at home (Folding@home FAHControl) on Ubuntu 19.10 Ubuntu 20.04 Font and UI elements too big on login I'm running Ubuntu 20.04 on an ASUS X99-E-10G WS w/ an NVIDIA 1080Ti and an LG 4k 32&quot; monitor which persistently gets recognized as 27&quot;. When I log in, the text of certain UI elements is ~2x the normal size. After I go to settings/universal access and turn large text on and then off again, everything is the normal size I expect. Screenshot after logging in  After turning &quot;large text&quot; on  After turning &quot;large text&quot; off  How do I get the conditions I have after cycling the &quot;large text&quot; feature to be present immediately after booting? I have the 440 version of NVIDIA's drivers installed. Why is it that many of the most important physical equations don't have ugly numbers (i.e., "arbitrary" irrational factors) to line up both sides?   Why can so many equations be expressed so neatly with small natural numbers while recycling a relatively small set of physical and mathematical constants?  For example, why is mass–energy equivalence describable by the equation $E = mc^2$ and not something like $E \approx 27.642 \times mc^2$?  Why is time dilation describable by something as neat as $t' = \sqrt{\frac{t}{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ and not something ugly like $t' \approx 672.097 \times 10^{-4} \times \sqrt{\frac{t}{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$.  ... and so forth.    I'm not well educated on matters of physics and so I feel a bit sheepish asking this.   Likewise I'm not sure if this is a more philosophical question or one that permits a concrete answer ... or perhaps even the premise of the question itself is flawed ... so I would gratefully consider anything that sheds light on the nature of the question itself as an answer.    EDIT: I just wished to give a little more context as to where I was coming from with this question based on some of the responses:  @Jerry Schirmer comments:      You do have an ugly factor of $2.997458 \times 10^8 m/s$ in front of everything. You just hide the ugliness by calling this number c.   These are not the types of "ugly constants" I'm talking about in that this number is the speed of light. It is not just some constant needed to balance two side of an equation.  @Carl Witthoft answers:      It's all in how you define the units ...   Of course this is true, we could in theory hide all sorts of ugly constants by using different units on the right and the left. But as in the case of $E=mc^2$, I am talking about equations where the units on the left are consistent with the units on the right, irrespective of the units used. As I mentioned on a comment there:     $E=mc^2$  could be defined using units like $m$ in imperial stones ($\textsf{S}$), $c$ in cubits/fortnight ($\textsf{CF}^{−1}$) and $E$ in ... umm ... $\textsf{SC}^2\textsf{F}^{−2}$ ... so long as the units are in the same system, we still don't need a fudge factor.   When the units are consistent in this manner, there's no room for hiding fudge constants. The probability that an initial quantum state $|\psi_i\rangle$ becomes the final quantum state $|\psi_f\rangle$ is given by  \begin{eqnarray} P(i \rightarrow f) &amp;=&amp; |\langle\psi_f|\psi_i\rangle|^2 \tag{1}\\ &amp;=&amp; \langle\psi_f|\psi_i\rangle^*\langle\psi_f|\psi_i\rangle \\ &amp;=&amp; \langle\psi_i|\psi_f\rangle\langle\psi_f|\psi_i\rangle. \end{eqnarray}  Equation (1) seems to show that the probability for the transition ($i\rightarrow f$) can be interpreted as the system both moving forward in time ($i\rightarrow f$) with amplitude $\langle\psi_f|\psi_i\rangle$ and backward in time ($f\rightarrow i$) with amplitude $\langle\psi_i|\psi_f\rangle$ simultaneously.  Does this reasoning help to explain the Born rule? (Is it like the Transactional Interpretation of QM?)  I guess we must experience the macroscopic direction of time ($i\rightarrow f$) in accord with increasing entropy in an expanding universe whereas microscopically QM works both forwards and backwards in time.  Addition  This is an improved version of the argument including time-evolution operators.  The probability that an initial quantum state $|\psi_i\rangle$ evolves to become the final quantum state $|\psi_f\rangle$ is given by  \begin{eqnarray} P_{i \rightarrow f} &amp;=&amp; |\langle\psi_f|U_{i \rightarrow f}|\psi_i\rangle|^2 \tag{2}\\ &amp;=&amp; \langle\psi_f|U_{i \rightarrow f}|\psi_i\rangle^*\langle\psi_f|U_{i \rightarrow f}|\psi_i\rangle \\ &amp;=&amp; \langle\psi_i|U^\dagger_{i \rightarrow f}|\psi_f\rangle\langle\psi_f|U_{i \rightarrow f}|\psi_i\rangle \\ &amp;=&amp; \langle\psi_i|U_{f \rightarrow i}|\psi_f\rangle\langle\psi_f|U_{i \rightarrow f}|\psi_i\rangle \end{eqnarray} where $U_{i \rightarrow f}$ is the forward-time evolution operator and $U_{f \rightarrow i}=U^\dagger_{i \rightarrow f}$ is the corresponding backward-time evolution operator.  Equation (2) seems to show that the probability $P_{i\rightarrow j}$ can be interpreted as the system first evolving forwards in time and then evolving backwards in time.  Perhaps this is an example of Murray Gell-Mann's  that "Everything not forbidden is compulsory"? At the quantum level, below observable probabilities, there is nothing to stop time flowing both forwards and backwards. I would like to have multiple bibliographies (reference lists) as described in   ().   However, I'd like to use with a single .tex file, which would contain the bibliography database embedded, as in  ...   Now, I want to use letter documentclass, for which the bibliography needs to be defined ()   So what I end up is with this example (code below, compiled with just pdflatex, no bibtex(which I'd like to avoid in this case)):     ... obviously, something works (multibib recognized primary and secondary cites, assigning them number "1" as start) -- however I don't get two, separate primary and secondary list of references; would that be possible in this context? (doesn't have to be with multibib, but I'd like to avoid a separate .bib file and a bibtex call)  EDIT: I'd also like separate cite keys (i.e. rendered as [a1] and [b1]; not yet sure if multibib can do that; edit: no it cant,  says "You can also edit the .bbl files created by BibTEX and add 'a', 'b',. . . to the labels, but your changes will be overwritten by subsequent BibTEX runs." and recommends \cite[a]{key}) - how possible would that be?  &nbsp;  The code is this:   \documentclass{letter}  % Environment thebibliography undefined when using letter: http://www.latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&amp;t=3359 \makeatletter \setlength \labelsep {.5em} \newcommand\newblock{\hskip   .11em\@plus.33em\@minus.07em} \let\@openbib@code\@empty \newcommand\refname{References} \newcommand\section{\@startsection   {section}{1}{\z@}%   {-3.5ex \@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%   {2.3ex \@plus.2ex}%   {\normalfont\Large\bfseries}} \newenvironment{thebibliography}[1] {\section*{\refname}%   \@mkboth{\MakeUppercase\refname}{\MakeUppercase\refname}%   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%   {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%     \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code     \usecounter{enumiv}%     \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%   \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty   \widowpenalty4000%   \sfcode`\.\@m} {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty       `thebibliography' environment}}%       \endlist} \makeatother  \usepackage{multibib} \newcites{pri}{Primary sources} \newcites{sec}{Secondary sources}  \begin{document}   \begin{letter}{Addressee} Blah, blah - content...  Primary cite: \citepri{lamport94} ...  Secondary cite: \citesec{lamport94} ...   \begin{thebibliography}{9}  \bibitem{lamport94}   Leslie Lamport,   \emph{\LaTeX: A Document Preparation System}.   Addison Wesley, Massachusetts,   2nd Edition,   1994.  \bibitem{lamport95}   Leslie Lamport,   \emph{\LaTeX: A Document Preparation System}.   Addison Wesley, Massachusetts,   2nd Edition,   1995.  \end{thebibliography}  \end{letter}   \end{document} linear dependence proof using subsets Real Numbers Raised to Imaginary Powers? What is a real number to the power of an imaginary or complex number? e.g. 3i. I have searched through sites about imaginary numbers, but none seem to say anything about imaginary indices. Examples and explanations would be appreciated. System Load Indicator only shows as a line unless hovered I installed the  GNOME extension on my Ubuntu 18.04, but for some reason, instead of showing a proper graph for CPU usage, it only shows a very thin line that seems to be a small portion of the actual graph. If I hover over it, the proper graph shows. How to make it show the whole graph all the time?