Remove Backup and Factory reset option from Settings app
Is there a way to disable access to certain Settings components?
How to submit a form when the return key is pressed? Can someone please tell me how to submit an HTML form when the return key is pressed and if there are no buttons in the form? The submit button is not there. I am using a custom div instead of that. Fantasy/scifi combo - band of travelers who must get from "sphere" or domain to domain - each geographic area is ruled by a magician - it turns out later these are people who are unwittingly tapping into the computer grid they all live on to alter their own reality? How to estimate $P(x\le0)$ from $n$ samples of $x$? Suppose, we have $n$ samples $x_i$ of a random variable: $$x \sim \mathcal N(\mu,\sigma^2) $$ Based on the samples, we want to estimate the probability that $x$ is negative: $$P(x\le0)$$ Intuitively, I would first estimate: $$\hat \mu=\frac 1 n \sum x_i$$ $$\hat \sigma^2={\frac 1 {n-1} \sum (x_i-\hat \mu)^2}$$ and then calculate: $$P(x\le0)=\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi\hat\sigma^2}} \int_{-\infty}^0 e^\frac{x-\hat\mu}{\hat \sigma} dx$$ However $\hat \mu$ and $\hat \sigma$ have variance! If I use this method, I suspect I am ignoring that variance and making an incorrect estimation. Is this reasoning right? If so, how can I estimate $P(x\le0)$ more correctly, taking $\text {VAR}[\hat \mu]$ and $\text {VAR}[\hat \sigma]$ into account? If $U_1$, $U_2,\ldots,U_n$ are proper subspaces of a vector space $V$ over a field $F$, and $|F|\gt n-1$, why is $V$ not equal to the union of the subspaces $U_1$, $U_2,\ldots,U_n$? Virtualbox Server/Client topology "Was going to" versus "would be" as the past tense of "will" Do you think that "was going to be" or "would be" could be used as past tense of will?     I thought this book was going to be your choice.        I thought this book would be your choice.   Do these two sentences basically mean the same thing or are they slightly different? Automatically detect edit abuse and exclude from badges/flag for mod review has 5 pages of 1 character edits (including an edit to one of my posts), apparently in a massive attempt to earn the Copy Editor badge.  Should Copy Editor, etc., ignore 1 character whitespace-only edits?    If we still want to count minor edits (which may be useful), could we at least detect edit abuse via some secret algorithm? ~20+ one character whitespace-only edits in the course of an hour should at least raise a flag of some sort.    If whitespace character are too hard to count, can we at least assume that 20 non-tag edits in 20 minutes (less than a minute per edit) is a good signal of abuse? The specific algorithm should be secret, obviously, but I think these sorts of edit abuses shouldn't be too difficult to detect. Why does TeX Live "require" yearly updates? Every year TeX Live provides a new version. My recollection is that soon after a new version is released, the old version's tlmgr stops fetching updates to packages. They provide  with the disclaimer     This procedure is not bullet-proof, or especially recommended   There is no upgrade path for Windows. Looking at the , it is not clear to me what is actually changing between releases such that a full new install is required/recommended. I always thought of TeX Live as providing useful binaries (e.g., pdflatex, biber, and makeindex) and a convenient way of updating  packages. What am I missing? Why does TeX Live need a new install every year? "There IS/ARE rice, meat and tomatoes on my plate" How can I get free or trial ExactTarget instance How can I get free or trial ExactTarget instance. I need to do ExactTarget SAML2.0 Single Sign-On connector development, integration and testing. Is there any step by step documentation available so that I can work on ExactTarget SAML2.0 Single Sign-On ? Why didn't the Hobbits get frostbite? This is a question that's been bothering me for the last couple of days:  How is it that the hobbits of the Fellowship were able to survive such cold temperatures throughout their travels without having any foot protection?   I know it's said that they have thick "leather like" soles, with ample amounts of hair for warmth but still, I don't understand how that could provide much more warmth than for instance a regular leather shoe. On top of this I know that multiple days (or even weeks) of their journey was spent crossing mountain ranges, which, near a summit would have a temperature far below freezing. This combined with the assumption that they only have the warmth of shoes on there feet would have presumably resulted in some level of frostbite. But to my knowledge there is no such mention of these problems in the novels or movies aside from the odd "It's cold".  Anyways, I'm just wondering if anyone has some form of explanation to this phenomenon or do hobbits just have really durable feet? How can I animate an object fading out? I have a firewall with these simple rules:  iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 127.0.0.1/32 --dport 6000 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 192.168.16.20/32 --dport 6000 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 6000 -j REJECT   Now, suppose I am using TCPDUMP like this:  tcpdump port 6000   And I have host 192.168.16.21 trying to connect to port 6000.  Will/should tcpdump output some packets coming from 192.168.16.21? Undefined Symbol ___gxx_personality_v0 on link I've been getting this undefined symbol building with this command line:  $ gcc test.cpp Undefined symbols:   "___gxx_personality_v0", referenced from:   etc...   test.cpp is simple and should build fine.  What is the deal? Prove that $\displaystyle \sum_{x=1}^{n} \frac{1}{x (x+1)(x+2)} = \frac{1}{4} - \frac{1}{2 (n+1) (n+2)}$.   I tried using the partial fraction decomposition $a_j = \frac{1}{2j} - \frac{1}{j+1} + \frac{1}{2(j+2)}$, but I don't see how that helps. Prove: $\displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^n k k!=(n+1)!-1$ (preferably combinatorially)   It's pretty easy to think of a story for the RHS: arrange $n+1$ people in a row and remove the the option of everyone arranged to height from shortest to highest, but it doesn't hold up for the LHS.   Alternatively, trying to visualize the LHS, I noticed that it's like a right angle tetrahedra:  1  2!+2!  3!+3!+3!  ...  But it doesn't help to see a connection to the RHS.  Note: no integrals or gamma function nor use of other identities without proving them nor generating functions. Gmail App in my Android device shows correctly all the labels that I created using Gmail through web interface.  Can I create new labels in Gmail on Android device using Gmail App?   Also, ideally, once I create these new labels in Gmail App, I obviously should be seeing the same in Web Interface of Gmail too (Sync!!).  Any ideas? A question about the higher-order Weyl variation for the geodesic distance I have a question in deriving Eqs. (3.6.15b) and (3.6.15c) in Polchinski's string theory vol I p. 105.   Given      $$\Delta (\sigma,\sigma') = \frac{ \alpha'}{2} \ln d^2 (\sigma, \sigma') \tag{3.6.6}$$   where $d(\sigma,\sigma')$ is the geodesic distance between points $\sigma$ and $\sigma'$.   It is said for the Weyl variation $\delta_W$,     $$\partial_a \delta_W \Delta(\sigma,\sigma')|_{\sigma'=\sigma}= \frac{ 1}{2} \alpha' \partial_a \delta \omega(\sigma) \tag{3.6.15a} $$   $$ \partial_a \partial_b' \delta_W \Delta(\sigma,\sigma')|_{\sigma'=\sigma}= \frac{ 1+ \gamma}{2} \alpha' \nabla_a \partial_b \delta \omega(\sigma) \tag{3.6.15b} $$   $$ \nabla_a \partial_b \delta_W \Delta(\sigma,\sigma')|_{\sigma'=\sigma}= - \frac{  \gamma}{2} \alpha' \nabla_a \partial_b \delta \omega(\sigma) \tag{3.6.15c} $$   Here $\gamma=-\frac{2}{3}$.   I know the reason for the factor of $1/2$ in the RHS of Eq. (3.6.15a) and I can derive it. But, putting $\nabla$ on LHS and RHS of Eq. (3.6.15a) will not lead to (3.6.15c). I guess it is because there is some higher-order terms in the geodesic distance where the treatment of (3.6.9)-(3.6.11) omitted. But I don't know how to get it. I tried $ds^2= g_{ab} dx^a dx^b= (\eta_{ab} + h_{ab})dx^a dx^b $ to separate the deviation of Minkowski metric, but I cannot get the factor $\gamma$   My question is, how to derive Eqs. (3.6.15b) and (3.6.15c) (especially there is a prime, $'$, namely $\partial'_b$ in the LHS of (3.6.15b) but not in the RHS) What GUI applications are there to assist in generating graphics for TeX? Why does factoring eliminate a hole in the limit? $$\lim _{x\rightarrow 5}\frac{x^2-25}{x-5}  = \lim_{x\rightarrow 5} (x+5)$$  I understand that to evaluate a limit that has a zero ("hole") in the denominator we have to factor and cancel terms, and that the original limit is equal to the new and simplified limit. I understand how to do this procedurally, but I'd like to know why this works. I've only been told the methodology of expanding the $x^2-25$ into $(x-5)(x+5)$, but I don't just want to understand the methodology which my teacher tells me to "just memorize", I really want to know what's going on. I've read about factoring in abstract algebra, and about irreducible polynomials (just an example...), and I'd like to get a bigger picture of the abstract algebra in order to see why we factor the limit and why the simplified is equal to the original if it's missing the $(x-5)$, which has been cancelled. I don't want to just memorize things, I would really like to understand, but I've been told that this is "just how we do it" and that I should "practice to just memorize the procedure." I really want to understand this in abstract algebra terms, please elaborate. Thank you very much.