jQuery - Can't get listview anchor to trigger alert
Event binding on dynamically created elements?
Best way to track onchange as-you-type in input type="text"? In my experience, input type="text" onchange event usually occurs only after you leave (blur) the control.  Is there a way to force browser to trigger onchange every time textfield content changes? If not, what is the most elegant way to track this “manually”?  Using onkey* events is not reliable, since you can right-click the field and choose Paste, and this will change the field without any keyboard input.  Is setTimeout the only way?.. Ugly :-) How to write ≙ in latex How to create id with AUTO_INCREMENT on Oracle? Is abstract algebra (mostly?) restricted to $2$-ary operators? This may be due to my own pure ignorance but it's my experience that all abstract algebra I've been introduced to, both in actual courses and in self-studies only exclusively deals with algebraic objects consisting of a set together with one or more binary operators defined on that set, perhaps over some other algebraic structure. Not counting categories here, just "low-level"-ish stuff.  I'm an undergraduate so my knowledge is of course very limited but I can't help to wonder why I never stumble upon algebraic structures with $n$-ary operators? Is there a good reason for this, something along the lines of $n$-ary operators behave "badly" when $n&gt;2$ or is it just my ignorance because I'm a beginner in the field? Why is the atmosphere transparent in the visible spectrum? One of the great 'coincidences' in physics is that the Sun happens to shine most brightly at exactly the wavelengths our eyes can see; it's an easy explanation that our eyes evolved to make the most out of what was available.  However, this spectral window is also , with Rayleigh scattering and the ozone layer protecting us from the UV and strong water vapour absorption in the IR until way into the radio range.  My question is: is this a coincidence? Were there geological factors that made it so? Or is it just lucky chance? (I also notice other planets in our neighbourhood weren't quite so lucky.) Or had atmospheric absorption been different our eyes would have tuned to whatever spectral window were brighter as a whole? How to search for upcoming conferences that will be held in a specific subject Properties of $x_k=\frac{a_{k+1}-a_{k}}{a_{k+1}}$ where $\{a_n\}$ is unbounded, strictly increasing sequence of positive reals Under what conditions will healers switch targets? I've been using healers lately, which I haven't really utilized much before. I've noticed that they will sometimes switch targets, even when their original target still lives.   What conditions are needed for healers to switch targets? How to convert a list of string to a list of int Can a java file have more than one class? How can I get free or trial ExactTarget instance How can I get free or trial ExactTarget instance. I need to do ExactTarget SAML2.0 Single Sign-On connector development, integration and testing. Is there any step by step documentation available so that I can work on ExactTarget SAML2.0 Single Sign-On ? I am using two books for my calculus refresher.   Thomas' Calculus  Higher Math for Beginners by Ya. B. Zeldovich   My question is : When applying Integral Calculus for calculation of volumes of solids, generated by curves revolved around an axis, we use slices of 'cylinders' to approximate the volume of the resulting solid and then integrate the sum of those infinitesimal cylinders. However, when we are using the same techniques to calculate the surface area of the surfaces generated by revolving curves around an axis, we consider the 'slope' of the differential length of curve 'dx', calculate the total length of the curve and derive the required surface area.  Are we not supposed to use the same 'slope' for calculating the volumes of the infinitesimal 'cylinders' for calculation of volumes? Shouldn't we use 'sliced portions of 'cones' as the infinitesimal volumes?? When it come to calculation of volumes of solids of revolution, why are we neglecting the slope of the curve for the differential length and simply assume that it is an infinitesimal cylinder??  Ex: Let us say we want to calculate the surface area and the volume of the solid generated when the parabola y = 10 . x^2 is revolved about the y-axis, with limits of x from 0 to 5.  In such cases, when calculating the volume of the solid, we consider infinitesimal 'cylinders', ignoring the 'slope' of the curve for the differential element 'dx', but when calculating the surface area, we consider the 'slope' of the differential element 'dx'. Vertex groups can not be named in blender 2.70 For some reason the name text field doesn't appear for vertex groups in blender 2.70. I tried in 2.69 and it's there and works fine. Was this feature removed in 2.70 or am I missing something? .NET - How can you split a "caps" delimited string into an array? How do I go from this string: "ThisIsMyCapsDelimitedString"  ...to this string: "This Is My Caps Delimited String"  Fewest lines of code in VB.net is preferred but C# is also welcome.  Cheers! Using media queries in Lightning component How to extract and install .deb without the command dpkg? I am running Debian jessie stable in order to understand how the .deb package interacts with the system. What is the correct way to extract and install a packge_name.deb without the command dpkg? Over time, I've noticed an increasing practice among moderators of the smaller sites (i.e. not in the Trilogy) to move extended comment chains to chat, just because they're too long. Is this a good idea? In the past, I've taken the position on many occasions that I believe that comments serve two purposes only: clarification, and asking for clarification.  I take this position because as a mod I want the freedom to purge a comment trail that is clearly running off the rails without having to argue with anyone about politeness definitions. But that's not the same thing as two pedantic C++ language lawyers debating the finer points of &quot;undefined behavior.&quot;  I give wide latitude to such discussions, as long as the participants don't start throwing spears, because I believe they are instructive. The SE software even has accommodations for this.  Long comment chains are automatically collapsed, so as not to disrupt the Q&amp;A format of the post.  And moving a comment chain to chat is not even a move, really; to do an actual move, you have to perform the conversion, and then delete all of the copied comments from the post. Here is a recent example:  and it's accompanying . What I find amusing is that the OP's detailed POV about the term, where he floats a theory about why everyone thinks that &quot;bugged&quot; is not a thing (that conversation took place in the comments, and is now safely sequestered in the chat room) gets to stay prominently featured in his question, at the very top of the post. Now you could argue that the chat room is a better environment to have these discussions anyway, and you'd be right.  I could argue that if we're going to do that, then why not just automatically convert long discussions to chat rooms? The problem is not so much where the comments reside.  I don't understand why mods are taking it on themselves to fix something that isn't hurting the site (at least in my opinion).  In addition, every time I see this happen, the participants in the conversation immediately lose interest in it.  The only comment that was posted in that room after all the comments were moved is most likely this one:  It wouldn't surprise me if the folks using &quot;bugged&quot; to refer to a certain software quality are the same folks who refer to their programs as &quot;codes&quot; and who believe textspeak is the pinnacle of modern English.  Which nobody will ever see. :) Some mods are really aggressive about this.  I discussed this with a mod on Physics, and he told me that they routinely move discussions when they think they might run off the rails. What is the explanation of the non-existence of magnetic monopoles? Number of subrings of a Field In , the votes clearly show that the os.path.splitext function is preferred over the simple .split('.')[-1] string manipulation. Does anyone have a moment to explain exactly why that is? Is it faster, or more accurate, or what? I'm willing to accept that there's something better about it, but I can't immediately see what it might be. Might importing a whole module to do this be overkill, at least in simple cases?  EDIT: The OS specificity is a big win that's not immediately obvious; but even I should've seen the "what if there isn't a dot" case! And thanks to everybody for the general comments on library usage.