IE6 debug javascript
Debug JavaScript within IE6
Incompatibility between etextools and etoolbox command \dolistloop (\forlistloop)? Do the 3 Doctors remember that they saved Gallifrey after 'Day of the Doctor'? I've read several posts and I've seen one that says before it was Eleven's turn to take part in the events of 'Day of the Doctor', Gallifrey was most certainly destroyed, and when it came to his turn he re-wrote history and saved Gallifrey. But I've rewatched 'Day of the Doctor' recently and the War Doctor asks if he'll remember saving Gallifrey and the Doctor says no. So I'm a bit confused, I don't want to think that the War Doctor or the 10th Doctor have lost their memories after saving Gallifrey and their life of saying they destroyed Gallifrey was a lie. So did they really remember? Okay the scenario I'm thinking of is as follows:   I control a ,  and 3 untapped lands (2 swamps, 1 Island to be perdantic). In my opponents turn he casts a burn spell to kill my duskmantle.   I activate his first ability in response.   The way I am hoping the following interactions will go is:   Duskmantles ability will hit the stack at the top and resolve The burn spell resolves dealing its damage to Duskmantle The burn spell card hits the graveyard and triggers the infinite loop for duskmantle and mindcrank killing my opponent Duskmantle perishes   Is this the way that the stack would pan out? Do I win in this situation regardless of the stack being correct or not above? (I am not fully familiar with how the stack really works in magic) You can see the cards from my deck . SQL Server: Cannot insert an explicit value into a timestamp column Any way to have CPU temperature in the menu bar? I tried  and  but it does not update the temperature and I do not wish to change the fan speed. Does time stretch all the way back for infinity or was there a point when time appears to start in the universe?  I remember reading long ago somewhere that according to one theory time began shortly before the creation of the universe.  Does time have a starting point of note? Suppose that $f:\Bbb R\to \Bbb R$ is continuous and that $f(x)\to 0$ as $x\to \pm\infty$. Prove that $f$ is uniformly continuous.   Since $f(x)\to 0$ as $x\to \pm\infty$ we have $|f(x)|&lt;\epsilon $ whenever $x&lt;-K$ and $x&gt;K$ where $K&gt;0$.  Also $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[-K,K]$ as the domain is compact.  Hence $f$ is uniformly continuous in $(-\infty,-K)\cup [-K,K]\cup (K,\infty)$.  But how to conclude that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $\Bbb R$ from above as I may chose $x\in (-\infty,-K);y\in [-K,K]$ ,how to conclude that $|f(x)-f(y)|&lt;\epsilon $ from above for a given $\epsilon$?  Please suggest the edits required. Git ignore file for Xcode projects Which files should I include in .gitignore when using Git in conjunction with Xcode? How to prevent an email from accidentally being forwarded? Is it possible to prevent an email from being forwarded, or to have sensitive information automatically removed when reply-all/forward is pressed?  For example, a Google Calendar invitation includes a link to directly accept/reject the event. However, if someone clicks reply-all, and they keep the HTML formatting, the link will be shared with everyone else who received the invitation, and they can change the user's RSVP. (Specifically, the email is sent only to you, but has a "To:" header showing all invitees, so the problem remains.)  What can be done to ensure that the recipient does not accidentally share the sensitive link? Would it be possible with some MIME trickery or with a semi-standard header? Or is the best practice to refrain from including such "direct action" links when someone might be tempted to reply-all? I would like to remove selected commit log entries from a linear commit tree, so that the entries do not show in the commit log.  My commit tree looks something like:  R--A--B--C--D--E--HEAD   I would like to remove the B and C entries so that they do not show in the commit log, but changes from A to D should be preserved. Maybe by introducing a single commit, so that B and C become BC and the tree looks like.  R--A--BC--D--E--HEAD   Or, ideally, after A comes D directly. D' representing changes from A to B, B to C and C to D.  R--A--D'--E--HEAD   Is this possible? if yes, how?  This is a fairly new project so has no branches as of now, hence no merges as well. Why is the area under a curve the integral? I understand how derivatives work based on the definition, and the fact that my professor explained it step by step until the point where I can derive it myself.  However when it comes to the area under a curve for some reason when you break it up into an infinite amount of rectangles, magically it turns into the anti-derivative. Can someone explain why that is the definition of the integral and how Newton figured this out? Miraak is stealing all my dragon souls I tried to use this for the last part of my table, but I can't get a vertical line at the end. Does anyone know?   \begin{tabular}{|CC|C|C|C|C|C|C|C|C|C|C|}\hline \Tab{Method Based on \\\hline       Radiography\\Magnetic Particle (A.C.)\\ \\Eddy Current\\Dye Penetrants\\ Ultrasonics} &amp; \Tab{ \\\hline \\ Wet \\ Dry \\ \\ \\ \\} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Minute Surface Cracks }~}  \\\hline       N\\ G\\F\\F\\F\\P}  &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Deeper Surface Cracks      }~}  \\\hline            F\\G\\G\\G\\G\\G} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Internal Cracks      }~}  \\\hline            F\\N\\N\\N\\N\\G} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Fatigue Cracks      }~}  \\\hline            P\\G\\G\\N\\G\\G} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Internal Voids      }~}  \\\hline            G\\N\\N\\N\\N\\G}           &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Porosity and Slag in Welds      }~}  \\\hline            G\\N\\N\\P\\N\\F}           &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Thickness      }~}  \\\hline            F\\N\\N\\P\\N\\G} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Stress Corrosion      }~}  \\\hline            F\\G\\F\\N\\G\\F} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Blistering      }~}  \\\hline            P\\N\\N\\N\\N\\F} &amp; \Tab{\rotatebox{90}{~\parbox{5cm}{Corrosion Pits      }~}  \\\hline            G\\N\\P\\N\\F\\P} \\\hline &amp; \multicolumn{11}{l}{G=Good;F=Fair;P=Poor;N=Not suitable.} \\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{tab:NDETechniques} \end{table}   It comes out like this: How do I grep for all non-ASCII characters? Why would I want to use Interfaces? I understand that they force you to implement methods and such but what I cant understand is why you would want to use them. Can anybody give me a good example or explanation on why I would want to implement this. Is  free for business platforms?  Has Ubuntu changed its conditions about using the OS for profit purposes? Database synchronization between dev/staging and production I'm looking into the technique of 'hanging' meat, and whether there are 'home' applications that would be safe and have a beneficial effect.  Now, there are a lot of (possible) synonyms that muddle the waters (for me). There's hanging, dry-aging, faisandage (for game birds), and more. What I'm looking for is the 1-3 day (near) room-temperature storage of meat and the spoiling / enzyme process that will cause a flavor change. Feel free to help me along by clarifying the answer.  Basically:   Is there any (good) use for this technique / process for supermarket / butcher cuts of meat? What should be taken in consideration for safe execution? Given a ring $R$ (with unity), prove that if $a \in R$ is nilpotent, then $a+1,a-1$ are both invertible.   Suppose $a^n=0$. Then $1=1-a^n=(1-a)(1+a+\ldots+a^{n-1})$, so $1-a$ is invertible.  If $n$ is odd we can use $1+a^n=(1+a)(1-a+\ldots+a^{n-1})$.  But what if $n$ is even? How does one decide whether to use who or that? In the title example:   The correct pronoun is who. The correct pronoun is that. Either is correct. They're interchangeable. It depends on the context.