Ubuntu (16.04 LTS 64-bit) keeps disconnections from WiFi
Ubuntu 16.10 Wifi Trouble - RT2561/RT61
How to keep font preferences in TexWorks 4 The default font is too small on my screen at the resolution I have it, so I like to reset the font to size 12, but it appears I have to do this everytime I launch the program.  How do I make it remember my preferences? I asked a question  but, rather stupidly, added extra information after it had been answered.  My additional question is this: I have a table with varying lengths of words. I want to encircle different groups of cells, including diagonals. If possible, it would be great if the rectangles don't overlap each other where possible.  I looked at the answer , which, whilst tedious, worked except for the overlap.    This is where I've got to so far:  \documentclass[fleqn,12pt,a4paper,landscape]{article}  \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{tabularx}  \begin{document}  % Introduce a new counter for counting the nodes needed for circling \newcounter{nodecount} % Command for making a new node and naming it according to the nodecount     counter \newcommand\tabnode[1]{\addtocounter{nodecount}{1} \tikz \node     (\arabic{nodecount}) {#1};}  % Some options common to all the nodes and paths \tikzstyle{every picture}+=[remember picture,baseline] \tikzstyle{every node}+=[inner sep=0pt,anchor=base, minimum width=1.8cm,align=center,text depth=.25ex,outer sep=1.5pt] \tikzstyle{every path}+=[thick, rounded corners]  \begin{table}[ht]   \begin{minipage}[b]{1 \linewidth}\centering    \begin{tabular}{cccccc} % Turn the cells needed for defining the circling paths into nodes with our     custom command \tabnode{Long ago}&amp; \tabnode{A few days ago}&amp; \tabnode{Day before         yesterday}&amp; \tabnode{Yesterday} &amp;  &amp;  \\      &amp; &amp; &amp;  &amp; \tabnode{Today} &amp; \tabnode{Now}\\      \tabnode{Long time in the future}&amp; \tabnode{A few days on}&amp;     \tabnode{Day after tomorrow}&amp; \tabnode{Tomorrow} &amp;  &amp; \\      \end{tabular}    \end{minipage}   \begin{tikzpicture}[overlay] % Define the circle paths \draw [blue](1.north west) -- (1.north east) -| (7.north east) |- (7.south     west) |- (1.north west); \draw [red](8.south west) -| (2.north east) -| (2.south west) |- (8.south     west); \draw [yellow](9.south west) -| (3.north east) -| (3.south west) |- (9.south     west); \draw [green](8.south west) -| (3.north east) -| (2.south west) |- (8.south     west);   \end{tikzpicture}  \end{table} \end{document}  %%% Local Variables:  %%% mode: latex %%% TeX-master: t %%% End: I'm trying to find an alternative to the standard tombstone qed symbol for more informal papers. I initially thought of an empty square with Pub written inside, but what would actually be better would be a small beer mug symbol. (much like the one found in this set of icons )  Unfortunately there doesn't seem to such a symbol in the comprehensive latex symbol list (although many funny symbols can be found there). Has anyone thought about this? Is there any quick-and-dirty solution? Catching exceptions from a constructor's initializer list Why do video cables (DVI, VGA) still screw in? I guess I could imagine that there was a time when accidentally disconnecting the monitor would have been catastrophic, though I don't see that being the case today.  Is it just a legacy holdover that they are still secured with screws?  Also, why is it that the video connection is really the only one that is still secured this way?  It seems like the power cable would be a better candidate to be secured with screws.  That really could be catastrophic.  In the end, the reason this question occurred to me is that I've never had a video cable come out when not screwed in, so why the significant security? Why doesn't the definition of a category require an explicit notion of morphisms equality? I am learning basics of the category theory (CT).  I do understand that CT is a modern powerful framework to describe various branches of mathematics in a unified way.  I do admit that category's definition tells a lot about the whole thing and focuses on the most important properties, shadowing unnecessary details. However, the more I go forward, the more it feels like it should explicitly require a notion of morphisms equality (like it does with morphism composition). It feels so because equality or inequality of morphisms arises everywhere, since the very beginning: any commutative diagram eventually reduces to an equality of two different paths and many other things involve equality as well. Even composition is defined grounding upon an (implicit) equality!  I'll try to give an example of my concern. Consider $\mathbb{SET}$. Its objects are sets and morphisms are functions. Now, let's recall that functions are sets as well - to be more precise, a function $f : A \mapsto B$ is a subset of a $A \times B$ obeying certain properties, which I omit. Thus, one could argue that $f$ is both a morphism between objects $A, B \in Obj(\mathbb{SET})$ and an object defined as a set of pairs $\{ (a_1 \in A, b_1 \in B), ..., (a_n \in A, b_n \in B) \}$ and those are equal because both are essentially exactly the same thing.  I hope my concern is clear and I need some kind of "conceptual insight" from knowledgeable people to move forward. Please give me the right perspective. CPT Template Not Showing - Getting 404 I'm developing a Custom Post Type plugin, which works fine in dev. Now that I've moved it to production, I'm getting a 404 when I try to display the template for the CPT.   So, two questions:  1- Is there some mechanism to determine the path WP took to get through the hierarchy?  2- Why wouldn't it just give me the single or index page?  I've dumped $wp_query and a stacktrace at the end of the 404. Here's part of what I found:  [query] =&gt; Array     (         [page] =&gt;          [pagename] =&gt; refletters/proximity     )  [request] =&gt; SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND (wp_posts.ID = '0') AND wp_posts.post_type = 'page'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC  [posts] =&gt; Array     (     )  [queried_object] =&gt;  [queried_object_id] =&gt; 0   And the stack trace:  2013-04-27 22:16:41 - 24.52.197.40 - TRACE - index.php - 404.php[39] -      wordpress/wp-content/themes/notoriousconsultant/404.php[39] - aaLog-&gt;logtrace     wordpress/wp-includes/template-loader.php[50] - include     wordpress/wp-blog-header.php[16] - require_once     wordpress/index.php[17] - require   Thanks for your help. I have this table definition as part of a invoice  \begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}[ht]{lXrr}%   It worked fine for years until I have a very short word in the X column for the first time. Now my table is very small in width and centered horizontally on the page.  In my expectation the X column should fill up all space until the width of the table reaches the width of the page except the margins.  I have read about workarounds specifying something like 1.2\textwidth, but I don't like that, because the table is a template included via \include, so it would affect all my invoices.  I also tried \linewidth, \hsize and \columnwidth, but everything results in the same layout.  Is there a way to make the only X column expand so that it uses all available space?    Complete included table definition (Rechnungstabelle.tex):  \newcommand{\Rechnungstabelle}[4]{% vielen Dank für Ihren Auftrag. \noindent \begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}[ht]{lXrr}% \toprule% \bf{Anzahl} &amp; \bf{Bezeichnung} &amp; \bf{Einzelpreis} &amp; \bf{Gesamtpreis} \\% \midrule% #1% \bottomrule% &amp; \bf{Rechnungsbetrag}  &amp; &amp; \bf{\EUR{#2}} \\% \ifthenelse{\equal{#3}{}}{}{&amp; Enthaltene MwSt. 19\% &amp; &amp; \EUR{#3} \\}% \ifthenelse{\equal{#4}{}}{}{&amp; * Enthaltene MwSt. 7\% &amp; &amp; \EUR{#4} \\}% \end{tabularx}% }   Changing the table header row to  \bf{Anzahl} &amp; \bf{Bezeichnung} \hspace{\textwidth} &amp; \bf{Einzelpreis} &amp; \bf{Gesamtpreis} \\%   is a workaround, but I don't think that would be good TeX style.  Minimum example for reproducing:  \documentclass[ fontsize=12pt,                  paper=a4,                 foldmarks=TBMPL,                 fromalign=center,                 ngerman                 ]{scrlttr2} \usepackage{babel} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenx} \usepackage[right]{eurosym} \usepackage{tabularx} \usepackage{ltablex} \usepackage{booktabs} \usepackage{ifthen}  \input{Rechnungstabelle} \begin{document} \begin{letter}  \Rechnungstabelle{     1,0 h &amp; Do something &amp; \EUR{99,00} &amp; \EUR{99,00} \\      }     {99,00}     {}{} \end{letter} \end{document} Birthday Problem applied to collisions I'm trying to extend the birthday problem to detect collision probability in a hashing scheme. Here is my problem. I use the letters and numbers [A-Z][a-z][0-9] to make a set of keys by randomly choosing from that set 10 times and concatenating them all together. So A24cv30kf2 could be one key for example. This implies that the base set has $62^{10}$ possible keys. Next, I want to compute the probability that I would see a collision if I picked a key from that set and issued it to $n$ users. If $M$ represents the size of the set (= $62^{10}$) and $P(M,n)$ the probability then  $$P(M,n) = \frac{M!}{M^{n}(M-n)!}$$  This follows by replacing 365 in the well known birthday problem shown   What I want to understand is the following: I want to check and see if my choice of concatenating 10 is right, when I know that my $n$ is of the order of a few millions and my $1 - P(M,n)$ needs to be less than 0.0001 or some small number. The large values of M &amp; n make the above intractable to compute. Is there an easier way to compute this? Two columns with different background color and height of whole page I want to create page with two columns with different background color and height of whole page. What I was able to do is two columns with different background color but I can't set proper height and there is small gap between two columns and another gap between top of the page and top of the columns. I want to remove these gaps. Also I want to create vertical line between two columns. Right now I have minipages packed inside \colorbox which allows me to create all four borders but I only want one.   Final effect should look like this:    This is what I figured out for now:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{blindtext} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage{geometry} \geometry{margin=0in}  \begin{document} \noindent \fcolorbox{black}{red}{ \begin{minipage}{.3\textwidth}   test \end{minipage} } \fcolorbox{yellow}{yellow}{ \begin{minipage}{.7\textwidth}   test \end{minipage} } \end{document} Can Superman see through his eyelids? Installing Office 2010 on Ubuntu 15.04 using Wine I had installed Office 2010 32bit on Ubuntu 12.04 before using guides such as . However, due to package changes, I was not able to replicate the same on Ubuntu 15.04.  How does one install Office 10 using Wine? Are all multiplicative functions additive? Suppose $cf(x)=f(cx)$ and $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$. I believe it follows that $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$.   Proof: There is some $c$ such that $y=cx$. Then  $$f(x+y)=f\left((1+c)x\right)=(1+c)f(x)=f(x)+cf(x)=f(x)+f(cx)=f(x)+f(y)$$  QED.  I wonder if the same thing holds for when $f:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^n$? I can't use the same trick, because all vectors are not scalar multiples.  I tried thinking of it in terms of basis units, but didn't get anywhere. What is the difference between '/' and '//' when used for division? My distribution is normal; Kolmogorov-Smirnov test doesn't agree I have a problem with the normality of some data I have:  I've done a Kolmogorov test which says it isn't normal with p=.0000,  I don't understand: the skewness of my distribution =-.497, and the kurtosis =-0,024  Here is the plot of my distribution which looks very much normal ...  (I have three scores, and each one of this scores isn't normal with a significant p-value for the Kolmogorov test ... I really don't understand ) Should I really pay off my entire credit card balance each month or should I maintain some balance? I have a bunch of files as follows:  04602635_b0294.DAT20120807164534 04602637_b0297.DAT20120807164713 04602638_b0296.DAT20120807164637 04602639_b0299.DAT20120807164819 04602640_b0298.DAT20120807164748 04602641_b0300.DAT20120807164849 04602650_b0301.DAT20120807164921 04602652_b0302.DAT20120807164956   I need to rename them to exclude the prefix. It needs to look like this..  b0294.DAT20120807164534 b0297.DAT20120807164713 b0296.DAT20120807164637 b0299.DAT20120807164819 b0298.DAT20120807164748 b0300.DAT20120807164849 b0301.DAT20120807164921 b0302.DAT20120807164956   EDIT  I forgot to add that I am using Solaris. Why does an argument similiar to 0.999...=1 show 999...=-1? How should I type author names in a bib file? Can someone please explain in a clear and concise way how am I supposed to enter the names of authors in a BibTeX file? I have entries with something like   @article{someid,    author = {Juan A. Navarro P\'erez, Ra\'ul de la Garza and Andr\'es Espinoza},    ...   but somehow the output seems kind of wrong! How to make traces on an universal PCB? I hope this question won't be closed as too subjective. I'd like to know best practice - how to make traces on universal PCB's with individual holes without traces (like the following image). My idea is to bend the ends of discrete components and use them to make traces to other components. Is this approach acceptable, or nasty? Although this is called "prototype" PCB, I'd like to use it for my simple final circuits (low frequency, low current applications), because I hope it will save time.