Big brackets multiple lines in LYX
How to make \left, \right pairs of delimiter work over multiple lines?
Book: Handful of children kept in a school as political mythological prisoners If $id:(X,d_1)\to (X,d_2)$ is continuous then what will be $X$? How run a .jar file with a double-click? Stopping to eat is tedious, is there any way to automate the process? While I've managed to optimize and automate almost everything, constantly having to stop and eat is annoying (I run around a lot, so I get hungry quickly). Is there any device or tool that will keep me well fed at all times without having to stop and feed? How can I determine file type without an extension on Windows? Start Mathematica without the menu bar? Should the eigenkets be weighted in $|P\rangle = \sum\limits_{r}|\xi^r\rangle$? Page 37 of Dirac's book The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, states  The condition for the eigenstates of $\xi$ to form a complete set must thus be formulated, that any ket $|P\rangle$ can be expressed as an integral plus a sum of eigenkets of $\xi$, i.e. $$|P\rangle = \int |\xi'c\rangle\; d\xi' + \sum\limits_{r}|\xi^rd\rangle$$ where the $|\xi'c\rangle$, $|\xi^rd\rangle$ are all eigenkets of $\xi$, the labels c and d being inserted to distinguish them when the eigenvalues $\xi'$ and $\xi^r$ are equal, and where the integral is taken over the whole range of eigenvalues and the sum is taken over any selection of them.  I find it inconsistent that the eigenkets under the integral are weighted by what appears to be a differential eigenvalue $d\xi'$, yet all the eigenkets under the summation are weighted by the value 1. Is this correct? Is there a drupal.org API for retrieving the list of available modules? Appendix in LaTeX Non-trivial cyclic group with unique generator Let $G$ be a non-trivial cyclic group with an unique generator. Show that $G$ has exactly two elements.   Let $g$ be a generator of $G$. My first idea to approach the problem was to show that if $|G|=n &gt; 2$ then there is an integer $k$ between 1 and $n$ such that $\langle g^k \rangle = G$ or, equivalently, $g \in \langle g^k \rangle$. My second idea was to analyse the problem in 2 separate cases. For the first one, if $n$ is prime, let $k$ be a positive integer then, by Lagrange's Theorem, $|g^k| \mid n$ and, therefore, $\langle g^k \rangle = n$. Hence, we must conclude that, if $n &gt; 2$ the generator cannot be unique. For the second case, where $n$ is composite, I was hoping to get to a contradiction, but could not advance any further. Is there a way to develop either of these ideas or is it necessary a new approach? I'd like to download automatically tons of papers listed on .bib file so I'm trying to find a way to facilitate the process by, e.g. I import or input to a tool a certain .bib file which contains a list of literature, the output is the literature's .pdf file. Any idea to do so? What is the difference between an abstract method and a virtual method? What is the difference between an abstract method and a virtual method? In which cases is it recommended to use abstract or virtual methods? Which one is the best approach? Fixed points under action of conjugate group elements Lecture notes:  If $g$ and $h$ are conjugate then $fix(g)=fix(h)$. To see this, say $g=k^{-1}hk$  If $g.s=s \iff k^{-1}hk.s=s \iff h.(k.s)=(k.s)$  Me: I understand the last line- I just fail to see how it implies $fix(g)=fix(h)$  EDIT: As Ben S says I think there was a typo in the notes and they forgot modulus signs so- New Aim: show $|fix(g)|=|fix(h)|$ Is Linux a Unix? So, there are lots of different versions of Unix out there: HP-UX, AIX, BSD, etc. Linux is considered a Unix clone rather than an implementation of Unix. Are all the "real" Unices actual descendants of the original? If not, what separates Linux from Unix? Finding the limit of $\left(\frac{n}{n+1}\right)^n$ Which hydroxyl from either the phosphate or the glycerol is taken during synthesis of a phospholipid head? Some things I know:  omega_1 is the first uncountable ordinal, made up of all of the countable ordinals f is not necessarily continuous    For this proof, I currently have x as a condensation point in my range, and I know that (x - (1/n) , x + (1/n) ) is uncountable and everything to the left and right of this interval is countable. I understand that I want to shrink this interval small enough just to x (which will be my constant), making everything around x eventually countable. I also understand that this will eventually make all of the elements in omega_1 go to x but I am having a hard time seeing where my contradiction comes in. I also am struggling with writing this proof in a presentable fashion.   Thank you! How to deal with perfect separation in logistic regression? If you have a variable which perfectly separates zeroes and ones in target variable, R will yield the following "perfect or quasi perfect separation" warning message:  Warning message: glm.fit: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred    We still get the model but the coefficient estimates are inflated.   How do you deal with this in practice? How should I structure my URLs for both SEO and localization? Line of Bones to Travel and Conform to Curve (Train or snake following path)