Can a question "go hot" multiple times within three seconds?
Very hot network questions found
amsalpha-like bibtex style with manual labels How to make a char string from a C macro's value? For example, how to avoid writing the 'func_name' twice?  #ifndef TEST_FUN #  define TEST_FUN func_name #  define TEST_FUN_NAME "func_name" #endif   I'd like to follow the  rule.  Version of C preprocessor:  $ cpp --version cpp (GCC) 4.1.2 20070626 (Red Hat 4.1.2-14) If $A|B$ and $B|A$ then prove $A=\pm B$ If $A|B$ and $B|A$ then prove $A=\pm B$   So far I have $A|B \iff AX=B$ and $B|A \iff BY=A$ with $X,Y \in \mathbb{Z}$  Not sure how to finish, any help. I have heard from people who have switched either way and who swear by the one or the other.  Being a huge Eclipse fan but having not had the time to try out IntelliJ, I am interested in hearing from IntelliJ users who are "ex-Eclipsians" some specific things that you can do with IntelliJ that you can not do with Eclipse.  Note: This is not a subjective question nor at all meant to turn into an IDE holy war. Please downvote any flamebait answers. Problems after upgrading to 14.04 (only background and pointer after login) Direct product of abelian groups Let $G_1,\dots,G_n$ be groups. Prove that the direct product $G_1\times\cdots\times G_n$ is abelian if, and only if, each of $G_1,\dots,G_n$ is abelian. To prove that the direct product is abelian is straightforward but what I don't understand is the converse. Can we have a perfect field of characteristic $p$ with a non-archimedean valuation? When —the bartender at the Cantina at Mos Eisley spaceport in the first Star Wars—says:     “We don’t serve their kind here.”   In reference to C-3PO and R2-D2 entering the bar, it’s certainly a bit prejudicial, but are these commonly held views in this universe? We don’t see it happen anywhere else in the films but is it implied elsewhere? Is it possible to run Snow Leopard on a LATE 2011 MacBook Pro? Can I get US sales taxes refunded for electronics purchased while on vacation? I want to show that for $\gcd(a,b) = 1$ $a,b \in Z$   $\gcd(a+b, a-b) = 1$ or $\gcd(a+b, a-b) = 2$ holds.      I think the first step should look something like this:      $d = \gcd(a+b, a-b) = \gcd(2a, a-b)$   From here I tried to proceed with two cases. 1: $a-b$ is even, which leads to $\gcd(a+b, a-b) = 2$ 2: $a-b$ is odd, which leads to $\gcd(a+b, a-b) = 1$  My main problem I think is, that I do not know how I should include $\gcd(a,b) = 1$ in the proof.  Any help is appreciated. Thx in advance. Cherio Woltan How do I setup keyboard macros? In my daily life I'm always typing &lt;kbd&gt;Keyboard Character&lt;/kbd&gt; and I'd like to set up a macro in Ubuntu to automatically enter &lt;kbd&gt; &lt;/kbd&gt;.  I'd like to assign it to say Shift+Control+K or whatever keyboard control character combination isn't assigned and already used by Ubuntu.  Back in the day of TSR (Terminate and Stay Resident) MS-DOS programs this was possible. Certainly it must be in Ubuntu too?  Do I have to write a daemon to accomplish this?    I found other questions with no answers: ,   I found a similar question with an answer: . However that question stipulated the answer could not be AutoKey. What is the origin of "man on the spot"? What is the origin of "man on the spot" ?   defines on the spot and uses as an example man on the spot.     on the spot -  at the place in question; there; "they were on the spot when it happened"; "it had to be decided by the man on the   spot" (Emphasis added)   Some evidence suggests that the origin of the phrase refers to decisions made by officials of the past British empire and actions taken by them. The title of  of  is, "Is it posible [sic]?"  This doesn't provide any information at all. It should be mandatory for everyone asking questions on the Internet to read , which says:     Help your community learn from the question. When you field a good question, ask yourself "How would the relevant documentation or FAQ have to change so that nobody has to answer this again?" To my (British) ear, it never sounds correct to say you have a doubt about something.  I expect that doubt to be pluralised, even if there's only one specific thing that I'm doubtful of, in one specific way, so I would always say "I have doubts about something".  Answers to  say that using doubt as a synonym for question is "Indian English". That seems to be the case in  which starts with "I have a doubt on my construction", because the OP really is saying "I have a question" (which he goes on to actually ask). Okay, it should have been a question/doubt about something, not on, but I'm not concerned with that detail here.  But in  the OP says "...there is a doubt that can I use [some construction]". In that case it's not easy to see how the word doubt can be replaced with question.  I don't have a problem with, for example, , because there I interpret it as doubt=uncertainty (a state of mind, syntactically equivalent to words like happiness, agitation, sorrow, etc.). But you certainly can't "have a happiness about something". So my question is...     Is it acceptable today to use singular noun doubt in any contexts where it means something other than state of mental uncertainty? If so, what are those contexts? When I'm editing a stack snippet, I often want to copy code from the original question into the snippet. But while the snippet editor is on display, there's no way to access the question, other than opening another tab/window. What I often do instead is copy all the code in the question to the clipboard, open the snippet editor, then paste it all in and revise it to what I want. But when the original code is poorly designed, that ends up being more work than just copying the bits and pieces that I want.  There could be a "View Question" button that pops up the question over the snippet editor and allows copying. Or maybe the Snippet Editor could be draggable and resizable, so you can reveal the question and copy from it; but this would require that it not be purely modal. Is there a command to show the directory/file name when cat files?  For example: assume two files f1.txt and f2.txt are under ./tmp  ./tmp/f1.txt ./tmp/f2.txt    Then when I do cat ./tmp/*.txt, only the content of files will be shown. But how to firstly show the file name, then the content?, e.g.:   (The needed command):  ./tmp/f1.txt:    This is from f1.txt  and so on  ./tmp/f1.txt:  This is from f2.txt ...   Is there a command to do it? (There seems to be no option for 'cat' to show the file names) Disk brakes severely reduced in power after replacing bearings Using a question mark mid-sentence How can I use adb to send a longpress key event?