Flagging inaccurate answers, another possible solution
Requesting review of technically inaccurate answers
How to implement Enums in Ruby? Plot showing discontinuity where it shouldn't My daughter bought a ticket for a flight with a layover in Emirates (from Dallas, Texas to India). She had a stop of 48 hours in Dubai. When she was checking in in Dubai for Delhi, she was informed that her visa for India has expired in 2012. Did Emirates not have an obligation to check the visa for India before selling a ticket? I am looking for a good source on group theory aimed at physicists. I'd prefer one with a good general introduction to group theory, not just focusing on Lie groups or crystal groups but one that covers "all" the basics, and then, in addition, talks about the specific subjects of group theory relevant to physicists, i.e. also some stuff on representations etc.  Is Wigner's text a good way to start? I guess it's a "classic", but I fear that its notation might be a bit outdated? I recently moved to Linux, and I am in love with the experience. Opinions apart, I am having problems when running sudo dpkg --configure -a  My computer stops processing the command here:  You may know Adobe Flash Player is no longer supported, and I believe that could be why the command is unable to load pepperflashplugin-nonfree. I have tried fixing the problem by checking older posts here, but none of them was able to fix this problem. How do you create grass? While reading a question here whose answer was Stephen Baxter's &quot;Light of Other Days&quot; book, it reminded me of a short story I read with a similar idea. Probably read at least 30-40 years ago, in English. The fact that the Government has invented a device that can view the past is made public (by a whistleblower, I believe). Historians go nuts besieging the government to look at their favorite time periods to reveal the truth about various historical &quot;facts&quot; and or &quot;mysteries&quot; (Who shot JFK? Who was Jack the Ripper? Was Helen of Troy really that beautiful? Did Jesus exist? etc, etc.) And the government is stonewalls most of them and claims it's expensive to operate, hard to control to get exact time/location, etc. So someone (maybe the whistleblower?), knowing it's possible, does math/construction and builds his own version, and realizes it's easy to make, cheap to operate, and easy to use. So he makes plans to stick it to the government by releasing the info. Maybe he tries to force the government to release the info, or they realize he has made it, so they grab him and try to convince him to stop. But he is not convinced until they tell him, it can't see back very far (maybe just a few days/weeks, because it needs exponentially more power the further you look back.) Finally the agents tell him: &quot;Don't you see, you can use it to see what's happening just a few minutes ago, or even now. Your company can't make widgets? Zoom in on your competitors and see how they make them. Think your wife is fooling around on you? Zoom in on her and track her to see if she is. Your pretty neighbor is taking a bath now? Zoom in and watch her... These devices mean no one will have any privacy now.&quot; At which point he tells them it's already too late. They kept him there so long that the letters he mailed will already be delivered to various newspapers, scientists, historians, etc. why does loop-cut-and-slide ignore some faces but not others? why does the loop-cut-and-slide operation ignore certain faces but happily cut others?the model is symmetrical so it is a bit strange to pick 3 faces that won't get cut. I tried applying it to see if it was just a graphics glitch causing the purple line to not display over everything, but it did end up cutting only what the line was selecting, instead of the whole mesh.    as requested,here's a paste of the blend: This came up in  , but I can't see good documentation or examples that explain how the feature works. Shadows along edges of mesh in 3D View Is an empty set equal to another empty set? Elementary properties of closure Hi everyone I'd like to know if the following is correct. I really appreciate any suggestion. (Honestly the only one that matters me is the second property the others are easy, I think) Thanks.  Definition: Let $X\subset \mathbb{R}$ and let $x'\in \mathbb{R}$, we say that $x'$ is an adherent point of $X$ iff $\,\forall\varepsilon&gt;0\,\exists x\in X \text{ s.t.} \; d(x',x)\le \varepsilon$. We say that $\overline{X}$ is the closure of $X$ iff contain all the adherent points of $X$.  Lemma (Elementary properties of Closures): Let $X$ and $Y$ be arbitrary subset of $\mathbb{R}$. Then $X\subset \overline{X}, \; \overline{X\cup Y}=\overline{X}\cup\overline{Y},\; \overline{X\cap Y}\subset\overline{X}\cap\overline{Y}$. If $X\subset Y$ then $\overline{X}\subset \overline{Y}$.  Proof:  Clearly if $x\in X$,  $x$ is $\varepsilon$-adherent to $x$ (indeed is $0$-close to itself) for every $\varepsilon$, hence $x\in \overline X$.   Let $z'$ be an adherent point of $X\cup Y$, then there exists some $z\in X\cup Y$ such that $d(z',z)$ for a given $\varepsilon&gt;0$. Suppose  $z\in X$, hence $z'$ is an adherent point of $X$, i.e., $z'\in \overline{X}\subset \overline{X}\cup \overline{Y}$. Similarly when  $z\in Y$, $z'\in \overline{Y}\subset \overline{X}\cup \overline{Y}$. Thus $ \overline{X\cup Y}\subset\overline{X}\cup \overline{Y}$. We  know that $X\cup Y \subset\overline{X\cup Y}\subset\overline{X}\cup \overline{Y}$. Then $\overline{\overline{X\cup Y}}=\overline{X}\cup \overline{Y}$. Since $\overline{\overline{X\cup Y}} = \overline{X\cup Y}$ we're done.  Let $z'\in \overline{X\cap Y}$, i.e., $z'$ is an adherent point of $X\cap Y$. So, there is some $z\in X\cap Y \subset X$ such that $d(z',z)\le \varepsilon$ for any given $\varepsilon&gt;0$. It follows that $z'$ is an adherent point of $X$, i.e., $z'\in \overline{X}$. Similarly since $z\in X\cap Y \subset Y$ we have $z'\in \overline{Y}$. Hence $z'\in \overline{X}\cap\overline{Y}$.   Let $x'\in \overline{X}$ we'd like to show that $x'\in \overline{Y}$. Let $\varepsilon&gt;0$ be arbitrary then $\exists x\in X\subset Y$ such that $d(x',x)\le \varepsilon$, so $x'$ is an adherent point of $Y$, i.e., $x'\in \overline{Y}$ as desired. $\Box$     Claim 1: If $X\subset Y \subset \overline{X}$. Then $\overline{Y}=\overline{X}$.    Proof claim: Let $y'$ be an adherent point of $Y$, i.e., $y'\in \overline{Y}$ and let $\varepsilon&gt;0$ be given. Thus, $\exists y \in Y\subset \overline{X}$ s.t. $d(y,y')\le \varepsilon$. So, $y$ is an adherent point of $X$. Thus $\exists x\in X$ s.t. $d(x,y)\le \varepsilon$ and therefore  we must have $d(x,y')\le 2\varepsilon$ which shows that $y'$ is an adherent point of $X$, i.e., $\overline{Y}\subset \overline{X}$. Conversely if $x'$ is an adherent point of $X$. Then $\exists x\in X\subset Y$ s.t. $d(x,x')\le \varepsilon$, and so is adherent to $Y$. $\Box$     Claim 2: $\overline{\overline{X}} = \overline{X}$    Proof: It will suffice to show that if $x''\in \overline{\overline{X}}$, then $x''$ is an adherent point of $X$. Let $\varepsilon &gt;0$ be arbitrary and let $x''$ be an adherent point of $\overline{X}$. Then there is some $x' \in \overline{X}$ such that $d(x'',x')\le \varepsilon$. Since $x' \in \overline{X}$ by definition is an adherent point of $X$, so there is some $x\in X$ for which $d(x,x')\le \varepsilon$. Thus $d(x,x'')\le d(x,x')+d(x',x'')\le 2\varepsilon$ it follows that $x''$ is an adherent point of $X$ as desired. $\Box$ Keeping tables/figures close to where they are mentioned Is there any package or a method to force LaTeX to keep floating environments like table and figure closer to where they are declared? Wrong ordering in generated table in jpa What is the difference between a symbolic link and a hard link? Recently I was asked this during a job interview. I was honest and said I knew how a symbolic link behaves and how to create one, but do not understand the use of a hard link and how it differs from a symbolic one. Is $f(a)\!=\!0\!=\!f(b)\Rightarrow (x\!-\!a)(x\!-\!b)\mid f(x)\,$ true if $\,a=b?\ $ [Double Factor Theorem] How to address a professor in person at US universities? At US universities, how should one address a professor while talking to him or her? In my home country, we usually address the professors as either "sir" or "madam" while talking about our queries in person.   What's the norm at US universities? How to diagnose a search engine ranking drop? In  it says that flagged comments can be handled automatically if flagged repeatedly (3 + (score / 3) flags = deletion). Which is great; mods are busy people.  In , the venerable Bill the Lizard says that if all comments on a post are obsolete, you can flag the post (or one of the comments) with a custom flag saying that they're all obsolete, and the mod can remove them with one fell swoop. Problem is, that requires a mod.  What should I do when some of the obsolete comments are mine? I can't flag my own comments, and I don't like raising custom flags if I can avoid it.  You're wondering why I don't just delete them. There are two scenarios where I don't, at least not immediately:   Someone has commented with incorrect information. In that situation, I reply to the comment telling them how they've got it wrong. (Sometimes, of course, they quite correctly reply telling me how I got it wrong, which is neither here nor there&nbsp;&mdash; we still end up with obsolete comments. :-) ) Frequently, they reply saying "you're right" but (near universally) leave the comment lying around. I can (and do) then comment again saying "Let's clean these up" and flag their comments as obsolete. But I can't flag mine. Nor do I want to remove mine while the incorrect comment is still there; it leaves a confusing situation for anyone coming to the post later. Someone has commented with correct information. In that situation, if appropriate (e.g., the post author isn't busily editing at the same time and I know enough to do it properly), I'll edit the comment into the post and reply with "You're right, edited that in." and flag their comment as obsolete. These are rarely removed by the commenter. And again I can't flag mine.   The first scenario is the more problematic, since I can go back 10-20 minutes later and remove my "edited that in" comment and there's no harm if their comment is still there.  I currently bookmark and check back periodically, but that's labor-intensive and I'd like a better way.  Ideally, I'd want to tie my comment to one I've flagged so that it's deleted automatically if the other one is (by flagging, or by the commenter). That's a fair bit of development, though, I'm guessing.  What should I do? Go with a custom flag saying "The conversation between X and me is now obsolete," even though that means dumping it on a mod? Interaction term positive while components are negative? I am confused about the interpretation of my interaction term , I have been through similar questions but I am still not sure about the interpretation that I should give to my output .  So this is my model , Y  stands for earnings management , X1 = CSR , X2=CEO duality , as you can see both of the coefficients are negative CSR reduces earnings management manipulation and Duality in my sample reduces em as well  which is in line with the literature and confirm my hypothesis , but to my surprise my interaction term is positive and significant does that mean that CSR combined with duality increase EM ? Or that CEO duality moderates the effect of CSR on EM knowing that in papers that I've read, they only use&quot; moderate &quot;when the interaction term and the components are all negative . Could you please help me ? I am supposed to comment my results but I don&quot;t understand this . Thank you