Problem while saving a pdf file from a browser using Ubuntu 18.04
How do I move child windows without moving or minimizing parent in GNOME 3?
Good books on "advanced" probabilities I am trying get an unused server up and running, it booted fine but i was greeted with the login window and none of the known passwords seem to work. The server I am trying to get to work is not a Domain Controller and has not been used in a long time.  OS: Windows 2003 Server R2 Enterprise Edition  I tried Ophcrack XP (there is no WinServer version of Ophcrack) - it couldn't locate the partitions with hashes. I tried mounting the partitions myself (#mount /dev/hda*x* /mnt/ntfs), but it gave me an error saying /dev/hda*x* didn't exist.  Next I tried booting into a Ubuntu 10.04.3 LiveCD so that I could install and use chntpw - no go, Ubuntu Live wouldn't boot.  Based on what I've read up the following tools may be of help:   Windows Password recovery Petter Nordahl-Hagen's Offline NT Password &amp; Registry Editor Openwall's John the Ripper EBCD – Emergency Boot CD - Bootable CD (R)ecovery (I)s (P)ossible Linux rescue system   I am hoping that someone here has prior experience with Win2k3 Administrator password resets so that I don't end up having to try all of the above to find out which one works. Padding a number in a filename to a fixed length I have a directory of files such as:  file.1.png file.2.png … file.10.png … file.1000.png file.1001.png …   How can I pad the number to 4 digits? It should end up like this:  file.0001.png file.0002.png … file.0010.png … file.1000.png file.1001.png … A 256GB SSD has Windows-10 and 16.04 installed.  BIOS not UEFI.  A charity I work with requires me to use Quickbooks Desktop on Windows.  The plan is to ghost the existing system to a 512GB or larger SSD and create a third bootable Windows 7  partition for performing charity activities.   Is this possible to have a third partition? Is there a good example you have used as a guide? Is triple booting with two Windows partitions different from 2 Linux partitions?   If you have done this before ( with GRUB) please indicate this in your response: lessons-learned are appreciated.  Thank you Why are there so many places to put a binary in Linux? There are at least these five:   /bin/ /sbin/ /usr/bin/ /usr/local/bin/ /usr/local/sbin/   And on my office box, I do not have write permissions to some of these.  What type of binary goes into which of these bins? Best Algebraic Topology book/Alternative to Allen Hatcher free book? Allen Hatcher seems impossible and this is set as the course text?  So was wondering is there a better book than this? It's pretty cheap book compared to other books on amazon and is free online.   Any good intro to Algebraic topology books?  I can find a big lists of Algebraic geometry books on here. On a very old thread on Maths overflow someone recommended that a person should read James Munkres Topology first, then you should read Allen Hatcher book.   It just seems like Rudin's book but crammed with ten times more material. SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xa3' in file when function returns '£' 155 GB in c drive used up. 50 GB used in minutes. Windows 7 My laptop has Windows 7 home premium. OS is installed on C drive. The C drive has some 155 GB but currently only 1.17 GB is free. I deleted contents of my download folder and moved the contents from my desktop and my documents. this freed some 50 GB. but within minutes it was full again. ran disk cleanup and gained some 2 GB. i checked size of all the folders ignored large sized windows and program files and program files (x86). Was baffled when users folder said 110 GB. went to my user folder and selected all files n checked properties it showed under 5 GB. So if i check my user folders properties it says 110 GB but if i check properties of its content its under 5 GB. BTW I am not using any anti virus program. Do you guys have any idea whats going on. Is my laptop possessed or something? :P Please help me out. Show that: $\lim\limits_{r\to\infty}\int\limits_{0}^{\pi/2}e^{-r\sin \theta}\text d\theta=0$ I would like to show $\lim\limits_{r\to\infty}\int_{0}^{\pi/2}e^{-r\sin \theta}\text d\theta=0$.  Now, of course, the integrand does not converge uniformly to $0$ on $\theta\in [0, \pi/2]$, since it has value $1$ at $\theta =0$ for all $r\in \mathbb{R}$.   If $F(r) = \int_{0}^{\pi/2}e^{-r\sin \theta}\text d\theta$, we can find the $j$th derivative $F^{(j)}(r) = (-1)^j\int_{0}^{\pi/2}\sin^{j}(\theta)e^{-r\sin\theta}\text d\theta$, but I don't see how this is helping.  The function is strictly decreasing on $[0,\pi/2]$, since $\partial_{\theta}(e^{-r\sin\theta})=-r\cos\theta e^{-r\sin \theta}$, which is strictly negative on $(0,\pi/2)$.  Any ideas? Can not unlock my Android device as have no internet connection? Why is "the set of all sets" a paradox, in Layman's terms? I've heard of some other paradoxes involving sets (i.e., &quot;the set of all sets that do not contain themselves&quot;) and I understand how paradoxes arise from them.  But this one I do not understand. Why is &quot;the set of all sets&quot; a paradox?  It seems like it would be fine, to me.  There is nothing paradoxical about a set containing itself. Is it something that arises from the &quot;rules of sets&quot; that are involved in more rigorous set theory? What do I need in order to create an application for ubantu? python get only class attribute no superclasses How to prevent SIGPIPEs (or handle them properly) Why is the mean function in Gaussian Process uninteresting? $\sum x_n^2$ and $\sum y_n^2$ converge, what does $\sum (x_n + y_n)^2$ do? So I know that $\sum x_n^2$ converges, and $\sum y_n^2$ converges. ${x_n}$ and ${y_n}$ are both sequences of real numbers. How can I prove that $$\sum(x_n+y_n)^2$$ converges? So far I have $$\sum(x_n+y_n)^2=\sum(x_n)^2 +\sum (y_n)^2 +\sum(2x_ny_n)$$ so I need to prove that $\sum 2x_ny_n$ converges. Is this the right way to approach it? If it is, I am completely lost as to the next step.  I also need to prove that $$\sqrt{\sum(x_n+y_n)^2}\leq \sqrt{\sum(x_n)^2}+\sqrt{\sum(y_n)^2}$$  I assume this will follow pretty easily from a result in the first proof, but I'm stuck on that now, and perhaps it is easier to start with the second one. I have a lot of work I've done on the first problem, but none of it seemed to go anywhere. Any hints?  Thanks! I have used Windows since childhood, and when I hear the phrase "Windows filesystem" I think of directories (folders) within directories, a folder called SYSTEM, a folder called PROGRAM FILES etc. Is this what the system is? Just the layout of the folders?  And then I recently started using Linux, and my reference book says in the linux filesystem everything starts at root and branches off from there. How is that really different from Windows? I mean, it seems the linux system and the windows system are just two ways of setting up a directory tree.  Is this what file system means? Why do we get the same differential equations from both principles? Surely there is a fundamental connection between them? When written out, the two seem to have nothing in common.   $$\sum _i ( \mathbf F _i - \dot{\mathbf p}_i) \cdot \delta \mathbf r _i = 0$$  $$S[q(t)] = \int ^{t_2} _{t_1} \mathcal L (q,\dot{q},t)dt$$  After playing with d'Alembert's principle  we find that we can rewrite the whole thing as $$\sum _i \left[ \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot{q}_i} \right) - \frac{\partial T}{\partial q_i}-Q_i\right] \delta q_i$$  This can further be rewritten under certain conditions so we get the exact form of the E-L equation.   It seems to me that both ways of arriving at the result are fundamentally different.   A function must obey the E-L equations in order to minimize the action over a path, but when we look at the virtual work, it appears that they come from the fact that (quoting Goldstein) "particles in the system will be in equilibrium under a force equal to the actual force plus a 'reversed effective force'."  I think I understand the principle of stationary action, I can see how it leads to the E-L equations, but d'Alembert's Principle seems so arbitrary, I can't see any motivation for it. What is the connection between special and general relativity? What is the connection between  and ? As I understand general relativity does not need the assumption on speed of light constant. It is about the relation between mass and spacetime and gravity. Can general relativity be valid without special relativity? C# datetime parse issue