How to reboot Windows 10 [UEFI] after installation of Linux (Fedora) in Legacy mode?
How to get back Windows 10 [UEFI] after Legacy installation of Fedora 24?
For a finite set $S$ there are $\vert S\vert!$ orderings of its elements.  What is the cardinality of all orderings of $\mathbb{N}$?  What would $$\vert \mathbb{N}\vert!$$ mean?  Is it $\prod_{n\in\mathbb{N}} \aleph_0=\aleph_0^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_1$?   says the "equivalence classes of well-orderings of the natural numbers" has cardinality $\aleph_1$.  But I can't put together in my mind the connection between well-orderings of $\mathbb{N}$ and all orderings of $\mathbb{N}$.  (Are there non well-ordered orderings of $\mathbb{N}$?)  This leads to wondering what the cardinality of all orderings of $\mathbb{R}$ is.  (Actually my thought process went in the other direction, from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{N}$.)  I think knowing the answer to the above question will teach how to determine what $$\vert \mathbb{R}\vert !$$ means, if anything.  I will be happy if you assume the continuum hypothesis to be true for the purposes of this question, but any level of completeness is welcome. How can I determine accuracy of past probability calculations? I do not study statistics but engineering, but this is a statistics question, and I hope you can lead me to what I need to learn to solve this problem.    I have this situation where I calculate probabilities of 1000's of things happening in like 30 days.  If in 30 days I see what actually happened, how can I test to see how accurately I predicted?  These calculations result in probabilities and in actual values (ft).  What is the method for doing this? Thanks, CP A switch that is only ON if the reference voltage is matched -+ 0.1 volts Im a beginnerish will electronic and im looking for a switch that is only ON if the reference voltage is matched -+ 0.25 volts. So if i have a reference of 2.7v to match and i feed the switch a 2.75v the switch would be ON. But if i feed it  2.5v or 2.85v the switch would is OFF.   This might be a simple google search, but i am lacking the correct terminology. What's the deal with a leading underscore in PHP class methods? While looking over various PHP libraries I've noticed that a lot of people choose to prefix some class methods with a single underscore, such as  public function _foo()   ...instead of...  public function foo()   I realize that ultimately this comes down to personal preference, but I was wondering if anyone had some insight into where this habit comes from.  My thought is that it's probably being carried over from PHP 4, before class methods could be marked as protected or private, as a way of implying "do not call this method from outside the class".  However, it also occurred to me that maybe it originates somewhere (a language) I'm not familiar with or that there may be good reasoning behind it that I would benefit from knowing.  Any thoughts, insights and/or opinions would be appreciated. So Black Holes Actually Merge! In 1/5th of a Second - How? I've read a lot of conflicting answers in these forums. However, today saw the awesome announcement of gravitational waves. Two black holes merged:   Not only that, they merged FAST. In 1/5th of a second revolving around each other 250 times a second. The entire event was quicker than a heartbeat. Moreover, we observed this happening as distant outsiders. So now we can say for sure:   Objects approaching the event horizon DO NOT appear to slow down Black holes CAN merge in a finite (and quick) amount of time And all this is wrt a frame of reference far, far away   To quote the NYTimes article:  One of them was 36 times as massive as the sun, the other 29. As they approached the end, at half the speed of light, they were circling each other 250 times a second.  And then the ringing stopped as the two holes coalesced into a single black hole, a trapdoor in space with the equivalent mass of 62 suns. All in a fifth of a second, Earth time.  However, everything I've read so far has let me to believe that an outside observer should never be able to measure the collision happening in a finite time. So what exactly is happening here? I must have read at lest 5 different versions of this so far everywhere in these forums over the past several years. It is being surprisingly hard to achieve. I've tried so far:   Download file manager apps from Google Play. Unfortunately, "share" shares the files, not the file names. None of them had a option like copy file names Download backup apps. Unfortunately, none of them backup the file names of a folder.   Any idea to copy to the clipboard or share the file names of all the files of a folder? Give a sequence such that root test works while ratio test fails Find the minimum of $\sqrt{(x+1)^2+(y-1)^2}+\sqrt{(x+2)^2+(y+2)^2}+\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y+1)^2}$ For real $x,y$ Find the minimum of $\sqrt{(x+1)^2+(y-1)^2}+\sqrt{(x+2)^2+(y+2)^2}+\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y+1)^2}$ For real $x,y$. It is the distance of a point in a triangle from its vertexes which gives the minimum when $(x,y)$ is on the Fermat's point.  But now I am stuck in finding the location of Fermat's point.  $(1) \quad 4$ $(2) \quad 5$ $(3) \quad \sqrt{3}+2\sqrt{5}$ $(4) \quad 4\sqrt{2}$ Installing drivers for windows? These questions are really bothering me. Any help would be much appreciated.  Let $p$ be prime  a) If $(G, \oplus)$ has order $2p$, prove that every proper subgroup of $(G, \oplus)$ is cyclic  b) If $(G, \oplus)$ has order $p^2$, prove that $(G, \oplus)$ has a subgroup of order $p$ Expressing an opinion: to me or for me? Is 20 watts of electricity dangerous? I have a few circumstances which invlove someone being shocked with 20 watts of electricity and whether it would be deadly. So here they are:   Would 1000 volts at 20 miliamperes of AC (2MHz frequency) be dangerous or deadly? Would 1000 volts at 20 miliamperes of DC be dangerous or deadly? Would 10 Kilo volts at 2 miliamperes of AC (2MHz frequency) be dangerous or deadly? and Would 10 Kilo volts at 2 miliamperes of DC be dangerous or deadly?   Thanks for everyones help. Punctuation of direct speech, edge cases I recently learned that I have developed a consistent, but entirely wrong approach to punctuating direct speech in fiction. I am in the unenviable position of trying to relearn.  Previously I wrote such things as:     "I'm done." She said.   when the quoted speech was definitely, absolutely the end of a sentence. So now I know I need.     "I'm done," she said.   This follows the rule that a period is only allowed when the end of the spoken sentence is also the end of the sentence in the narrative. For example:     "I'm done." She slammed the door on the way out.   So, it now looks odd to me when there are multiple sentences in the speech:     "I can't take her. I'm done," she said.   Can you reassure me that is correct, or give the correct form? Please don't suggest rewriting the sentence to put 'she said' in the middle - I'm aware of that: I'm specifically asking about the punctuation rules.  The other odd case is speech ending with an ellipsis. Do sentence terminating ellipses (four periods normally) become:     "I can't take her. You know, ...," she said, nodding towards Jane.   If so, are non-terminating ellipses dealt with the same way?     "I can't take ...," she nodded towards Jane, "any more!"   or can non-terminating ellipses be used unadorned?     "I can't take ..." she nodded towards Jane, "any more!"   I'd be very grateful if you could point me at references as well as answers. For the record I am a British writer writing for both British and US publication, so any variation is also interesting to me! I am trying to prove that if I have $f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying $\forall x,y\in\mathbb{R},f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y)$. Which is assumed continuous at $0$, that $f$ is continuous on $\mathbb{R}$  I am fairly sure it is, for that property seems to be a property of polynomials, and we know polynomials are continuous where defined(all reals)  Any ideas for rigor?  $|x-a| \lt \delta \implies |f(x+a)-f(x)-f(a)| \lt \epsilon$  No idea where to go from here, this is my first time doing $\epsilon-\delta$ stuff. Is Morocco currently safe to visit despite the Ebola outbreak? I'm travelling to Morocco over the Easter period, and while I am aware that the current Ebola outbreak is mainly in Guinea, Liberia and Mali, and would have to cross the Sahara to get to Morocco, is it wise for me to go to Morocco at this time?  What are some basic precautions I can take in the case that the Ebola virus travels to Morocco? On freedom in Sartre's existentialism I am reading "Existenstialism is a humanism", the text of the famous conference by Sartre in which he explains his own version of existentialism. I think is full of logical inconsistencies, but maybe it's just because I don't understand it or I don't know enough about existentialism. Anyway, my question is about a specific passage. After having "demonstrated" that there is no way one can derive an ethics outside of Man (God does not exist and reason is insufficient), he asks himself according to what principle a person should behave and he says:     "For I declare that freedom, in respect of concrete circumstances, can   have no other end and aim but itself; and when once a man has seen   that values depend upon himself, in that state of forsakenness he can   will only one thing, and that is freedom as the foundation of all   values. That does not mean that he wills it in the abstract: it simply   means that the actions of men of good faith have, as their ultimate   significance, the quest of freedom itself as such."   So it seems Sartre says that when deciding a course of action, people will always choose "freedom," (and also, elsewhere, that "freedom" is always a good thing). That is for him the only principle, the only moral that governs or should (because we can do wrong judgments about what is freedom) govern our action.  My questions are:  1) do I understand correctly Sartre's thinking?  2) He says: a) freedom is absolute; b) the values that man chooses are also absolute because no God or reason can tell him what to do, c) therefore man will choose freedom. Is there any logic in this statement? If I replace freedom with X where X is "pleasure" or "justice" or "pain" or "zero temperature", wouldn't I "demonstrate" by this logic that man will choose X?  3) assuming what I said makes any sense, how can existentialism ever find a rule of moral conduct? and if it does, what is it and how can be demonstrated? and if it cannot, why is or has been important at all as a philosophy?  Thanks! What would be the Slater's determinant representation for an excited state? Setup  Introducing this spinorbital notation:  \begin{align} \Psi_1=\chi_{(r1)}\alpha_{(\omega1)}  = 1 \\ \Psi_1=\chi_{(r1)}\beta_{(\omega1)}  = \bar{1} \end{align}  and the Slater's determinant, for a system of two electrons, is:  \begin{align} |\Psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \Big|  \begin{array}{cc} 1 &amp; \bar{1}  \\ 2 &amp; \bar{2}  \\ \end{array}  \Big| = \frac{|1\bar{2}\rangle-|\bar{1}2\rangle}{\sqrt2} \end{align}  Question  Based on the example, what would be the Slater's determinant representation for an excited state like $\Psi_a^r$ (i.e. with parallel spins like: $|\bar{1}\bar{2}\rangle$) and $\Psi_{ab}^{rs}$ (feel free to use any number) ? In Inno Setup is it possible to add conditional statements to what in the [Run] section gets executed? Alternatively is it possible to manually update the built in progress bar? Basically I have 2 MSIs included and using Inno Setup as a bootstrapper, and depending on user input one or both of the MSIs are to be installed.  I have something working using Exec statements in CurStepChanged but it doesn't update the progress bar as the files are extracted and it looks like the installer is stalled.  I guess the end result is I want some progress bar updates while the files are extracted to the temp folder.  The following is my current code:  procedure CurStepChanged(CurStep: TSetupStep); var     ResultCode: Integer; begin     if(CurStep = ssInstall) then begin         if(InstallServer) then begin             ExtractTemporaryFile('ServerSetup.msi');             Exec('msiexec',ExpandConstant('/i "{tmp}\ServerSetup.msi" /qb INSTALLDIR="{code:GetInstallPath}\Server\" ALLUSERS=2'),'', SW_SHOW, ewWaitUntilTerminated, ResultCode);         end;         if(InstallClient) then begin             ExtractTemporaryFile('ClientSetup.msi');             Exec('msiexec',ExpandConstant('/i "{tmp}\ClientSetup.msi" /qb INSTALLDIR="{code:GetInstallPath}\Client\" ALLUSERS=2'),'', SW_SHOW, ewWaitUntilTerminated, ResultCode);         end;     end; end; Second order partial of $f(x,y)=\frac{xy(x^2-y^2)}{x^2+y^2}$ Consider the function $f(x,y)=\dfrac{xy(x^2-y^2)}{x^2+y^2}$ for $(x,y) \neq (0,0)$, $f=0$ otherwise.  I have to compute $\dfrac{d^2f}{dydx}(0,0)$.  I know that I have to calculate $\frac{df}{dx}$ first. But that is ,  $\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\frac{dy}{dx}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$. When I put it in wolframalpha, it gives me this calculation, and also just $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ as an alternative form.   Why do I just ignore the y'? I don't know what y(x) is, as a function of x.  y and x are independent functions, no? Is the op-amp inverting or non-inverting? I am studying the function and characteristic of an op-amp to build a line-following robot with the schematics below. However, in many tutorials, the way to differentiate an inverting and non-inverting op-amp is by looking at the connection to ground via the inverting or non-inverting terminal.  However, in the schematics, the op-amp is considered to have connections to ground, thus in this case, how do I differentiate it then?  I may have understood the whole concept wrongly. Pls help!    EDIT: Please ignore the switch as it may have been drawn wrongly by the supplier.