How can I do this command on linux some (sort -u command)
Is there a tool to get the lines in one file that are not in another?
Factorial of 0 - a convenience? Non-principal ideal in $K[x,y]$? Ask to install program after "The program 'x' is currently not installed" If you try to execute a program that is not installed you will get a message  The program 'x' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing:  sudo apt-get install x   and instead of offering you to install the program for you, you have to type the actual command. How can this behavior be changed? Wrong Sentence:     Never before in the history of the world such a thing has happened, I don't think that will ever happen again.   Right sentence:     Never Before in the history of the world has such a thing happened, I don't think that will ever happen again.   Why “has such a thing happened” is the right form, and why can't I use such a thing has happened? I'm trying to change sign text color in Java Edition on Windows 10. According to , this is done using the § symbol:  To enter &quot;§&quot; on Windows with most US/UK English keyboards type ALT + NUMPAD_2 NUMPAD_1  This works for me inside Notepad or this browser. However, when I enter this sequence in the sign input dialog, nothing happens. What could be causing this? How does stuff glow in the dark? Is There a Natural Way to Extend Repeated Exponentiation Beyond Integers? This question has been in my mind since high school.  We can get multiplication of natural numbers by repeated addition; equivalently, if we define $f$ recursively by $f(1)=m$ and $f(n+1)=f(n)+m$, then $f(n) = m \times n$.  Likewise, we get exponentiation by repeated multiplication. If $g(1)=m$ and $g(n+1)=mg(n)$, then $g(n) = m^n$.  In my high school mind it was natural to imagine a new function defined by repeated exponentiation: $h(1)=m$ and $h(n+1)=m^{h(n)}$.  These definitions only make sense for $n$ a natural number, but of course there are standard very mathematically satisfying ways to define multiplication and exponentiation by any real number. My question is this:  Can the function $h$ defined above also be extended in a natural way to $\mathbb{R}^{&gt;0}$?  The question is in the spirit of seeking an extension of $f(n)=n!$ to $\mathbb{R}$ and arriving at $\Gamma(x)$.  Let me focus the question, and attempt to make precise what I mean by "in a natural way." Take $h(1)=2$ and $h(n+1)=2^{h(n)}$. $h$ is now defined on $\mathbb{N}$, and $h(2)=4$, $h(3)=16$, $h(4)=2^{16}=65,536$ etc. Is it possible to extend the domain of definition of $h$ to all positive reals in such a way that  a) The functional equation $h(x+1)=2^{h(x)}$ continues to be satisfied for all $x$ in the domain.  b) $h$ is $C^\infty$. (Analytic would be even better but this seems maybe too much to hope for?)  c) All $h$'s derivatives are monotone.  These requirements are my attempt to codify what would count as "natural." I am open to suggestions about what would be a better list of requirements.  If such a function exists, I would like to know how to construct it; if it doesn't, I would like to know why (i.e. outline of proof), and if relaxing some of the requirements (e.g. just the first derivative monotone) would make it possible.  (If the function exists, I am also interested in the questions, "is it unique?" "Could we add some natural requirements to make it unique?" But my main query is about existence.) Vim inoremap for specific filetypes Is it possible to recover original content from an edited image file? OK possibly a random question here, but one that is relevant to the site and regarding a hot topic nowadays: privacy.  If I load an image file (in my case a PNG photocopy of a document which contains some personal details) into Gimp, and I 'fill' with black (i.e. as if to redact) the areas of the image that contain sensitive information, and I then overwrite the original file, is there any way that the original untouched image can be recovered or gleamed? Such as low level bit analysis or...?  If so what tools and techniques are behind that, and how can I mitigate this? Is it a simple case of not overwriting the original but simply creating a new file with the changes? How can you quickly get the complete path to a file for use in terminal? Why is the electric field inside a conductor zero in equilibrium? My textbook says the field inside a conductor must be zero in order for the system to be equilibrium and therefore there must be no excess charge inside.  Their proof:  1) Place a gaussian surface inside the conductor. Since the system is at equilibrium, all points on the surface must have an electric field of zero.  2) Therefore the net flux is zero, implying the charge inside is zero.  3) If there is no charge inside, all excess charge must lie on the surface.  My problem:  "Since the system is at equilibrium, all points on the surface must have an electric field of zero."  Why?  Consider an conductor with no excess charge. To simplify things, say the conductor consists of a 100 free electrons and a 100 ions of charge 1$e^+$. The conductor is neutral and at equilibrium.  Now consider the field on one specific electron. There a total of 99 other electrons and 100  ions. So there would be a net field acting on that specific electron. So even though the system is at equilibrium, the net field on the individual particles is non-zero.  So a system can be at equilibrium, even if the net field inside is non-zero. What am I misunderstanding?  Another example: Consider a system consisting of one electron and one proton. If nothing is holding them back they will attract each other until they touch. After they touch, the force acting on them is still non-zero, yet they wouldn't accelerate. Is it possible to conditionally format a cell if the cell contains formula (to alert myself and other users when updating the cell)? Shows "unable to locate package unzip" error I have installed Ubuntu 12.04 server , shows    E:unable to locate the package unzip   the above error is also shown, if I try to install packages also. Can any one help me out to get out from this error. By 18 years of age, I want a brand new car that's $43,668 I'm from Arizona and I will be 18 in 4 months. I make about $1,200 a month from my job. I have $600 in my bank account and I don't plan to  spend any of it until I'm  18.     I'm looking to get a brand new Jeep Wrangler Rubicon that costs about  $43,000. The down payment is 10% (about $5,000) with an APR of  4.28%. The duration is 60 months with a monthly payment of  $800.  I don't have any credit. My friend suggested that I ask my parents to put my name on one of their credit cards so that I can build some credit. I'm not sure how that works. Can someone suggest a good way of going about this so I can get this car on or around my birthday?  My mom does finance work  for a big company and she told me that I should get a cheaper car. I really want this one and I'm willing to work for it. I'm getting a second job to get more money rolling in. My mom said that the only way that this would work is if I have a down payment of $15-20k. She also said that not everyone qualifies  for a car like this one. What can get me to qualify ASAP when I turn 18? I'm reading  and I'm trying to understand the proof under "Degeneracy in One Dimension".  Here's what it says:     Considering a one-dimensional quantum system in a potential $V(x)$ with degenerate states $|\psi_1\rangle$ and $|\psi_2\rangle$ corresponding to the same energy eigenvalue $E$, writing the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the system:       $$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{ \partial^2\psi_1}{ \partial x^2} + V\psi_1 =E\psi_1$$       $$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{ \partial^2\psi_2}{ \partial x^2} + V\psi_2 =E\psi_2$$   Multiplying the first equation by $\psi_2$ and the second by $\psi_1$ and subtracting one from the other, we get:       $$\psi_1\frac{d^2}{d x^2}\psi_2-\psi_2\frac{d^2}{d x^2}\psi_1=0$$   Integrating both sides       $$\psi_1\frac{\partial \psi_2}{\partial x}-\psi_2\frac{\partial \psi_1}{\partial x}=constant$$   In case of well-defined and normalizable wave functions, the above constant vanishes, provided both the wave functions vanish at at least one point, and we find: $\psi_1(x)=c\psi_2(x)$ where $c$ is, in general, a complex constant. So, the two degenerate wave functions are not linearly independent. For bound state eigenfunctions, the wave function approaches zero in the limit $x\to\infty$ or $x\to-\infty$, so that the above constant is zero and we have no degeneracy.   Here are the parts I don't understand:   How does integrating $\psi_1\frac{d^2}{d x^2}\psi_2-\psi_2\frac{d^2}{d x^2}\psi_1=0$ yield $\psi_1\frac{\partial \psi_2}{\partial x}-\psi_2\frac{\partial \psi_1}{\partial x}=constant$.  Without having explicit formulas for $\psi_1(x)$ and $\psi_2(x)$, how do we just apparently pull them both out of the integral? I don't understand how the constant in the last equation vanishes just because $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ vanish at infinity. Even if it does vanish, how does that imply $\psi_1=c\psi_2$? Why exactly did the Sorting Hat originally want to put Harry in Slytherin? How to exceed left margin with longtable I'm trying to make a longtable that is wider than the textwidth at a certain moment. I've tried different things always ending up with a different problem:  First possibility: If I use the adjustwidth environment the longtabu does not align correctly. The left margin stays fixed and the right margin gets out of the page. This in contrast, if I do the exact same thing to make a tabu (instead of longtabu), it works perfectly. I think using the adjustwidth is the best way to go, but I can't manage to get it working.  Second possibility: I've found a solution using the fullwidth package. That package does the trick on small longtables, but freezes when I'm trying to do it on my big longtable. The command \setlength\LTleft{-2cm} didn't work as well.  The final option I tried was to use geometry. But that changes the margin of the whole page thus making a page break which I'm not interested in. The code I used for this was  \newgeometry{left=1.2cm} \begin{longtable} long table stuff \end{longtable} \restoregeometry   Here's an example of what I want contra what I get  \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage{chngpage} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{tabu}  \begin{document} \section{This is the original textwidth.} \lipsum[1]  \section{This is the width I need for my longtabu} \begin{adjustwidth}{-1in}{-1in} \begin{tabu} to \linewidth {*{13}{|X[l]} |} 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ \end{tabu} \end{adjustwidth}  \section{This is what happens} \begin{adjustwidth}{-1in}{-1in} \begin{longtabu} to \linewidth {*{13}{|X[l]} |} 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ \end{longtabu} \end{adjustwidth}  \end{document} I'm trying to get past a Snorlax and I need a Poké Flute to wake him up—how do I get one? XeLaTeX update [20201004] and item ball in Beamer Beamer item balls go missing while compiling in XeLateX since yesterday's TeXlive update, however, the same code works with pdfLaTeX. Any solution, please. Here is my MWE: \documentclass{beamer}  \setbeamertemplate{itemize item}[ball] \setbeamertemplate{enumerate item}[ball]  \begin{document}  \begin{frame} \frametitle{A tested title} text \begin{enumerate}     \item this is an item \end{enumerate} text3 \begin{itemize}     \item this is an item \end{itemize} \end{frame} \end{document} I am looking for a book about "advanced" classical mechanics. By advanced I mean a book considering directly Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation, and also providing a firm basis in the geometrical consideration related to these to formalism (like tangent bundle, cotangent bundle, 1-form, 2-form, etc.).  I have , but I would like to go into more details about the [symplectic] geometrical and mathematical foundations of classical mechanics.  Additional note: A chapter about relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics would be a good thing.