what is its proverb in English
Short expression to convey "but consider the source"
What are "Commited Memory", "Cached", "Paged", "Not-paged pool" & How They are Different with "In-Use Memory" I need to remove the annoying new "locking" screen that shows a giant clock: I can't remove it with just moving the mouse (as with any other desktop environment), the animation is slow, and it isn't asking me for a password!  I managed to disable it, just to discover that now I can't lock my screen on purpose, so I can't go away from the computer.  Just to clarify, I want to:   After some time the screen could go black, but if I move the mouse or press any key then I can use it directly (like a normal screensaver). If I press super-L then it is locked, and I must type the password to unlock (like a normal lock screen).   I found several "solutions", but none seems to work: Shape of the universe? need a regex to parse a csv file with double quotes in php If a function has a finite limit at infinity, does that imply its derivative goes to zero? I've been thinking about this problem: Let $f: (a, +\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ be a differentiable function such that $\lim\limits_{x \to +\infty} f(x) = L &lt; \infty$. Then must it be the case that $\lim\limits_{x\to +\infty}f'(x) = 0$?  It looks like it's true, but I haven't managed to work out a proof. I came up with this, but it's pretty sketchy:  $$ \begin{align} \lim_{x \to +\infty} f'(x) &amp;= \lim_{x \to +\infty} \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} \\ &amp;= \lim_{h \to 0} \lim_{x \to +\infty} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} \\ &amp;= \lim_{h \to 0} \frac1{h} \lim_{x \to +\infty}[f(x+h)-f(x)] \\ &amp;= \lim_{h \to 0} \frac1{h}(L-L) \\ &amp;= \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{0}{h} \\ &amp;= 0 \end{align} $$  In particular, I don't think I can swap the order of the limits just like that. Is this correct, and if it isn't, how can we prove the statement? I know there is  already, but I think this is different in two aspects. First, that question assumes that $\lim\limits_{x \to +\infty}f'(x)$ exists, which I don't. Second, I also wanted to know if interchanging limits is a valid operation in this case. Which is correct: "one or more is" or "one or more are"? Should the phrase be "one or more is...", or "one or more are..."? View revision history on mobile site It looks like it's currently not possible to view the revision history of a post from the mobile site. I think it would be a lot simpler than loading the desktop site on a phone just to get the revision history. I remember very little but enough... I know that there were 3 worlds, a real one, a mid-world kind of with a teleporter, and the world with all the creatures. The first episode was in the desert and there was a good monster that saved the main guys from a bad one. Before he saved them he said every end is a beginning and every beginning is an end.   Please help me; I've tried everything. I saw it on , I think it was not Japanese. I live in Croatia, so I saw it there. It was aimed at kids, but not younger kids. The main characters were human, around 15 years old. The teleporter was in the middle of a big structure. It was a 6 piece tp, so every circle was one, and it was shaped like a star. There were robots working there; they carried food and other things.  I remember that all the creatures thought that the humans are evil, all but the one, the "lord" of all of them. And yes, the main character got to the world by some sort of a device that he found and it belonged to another kid who lost it and they were able to transform in the creatures from the world by it. When they are in the "other world", their body stays in the real world and acts normally but their soul gets transported to the mid-world Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C++? We have the question   What's the answer for C++? Why is $\sqrt {12} = 2 \sqrt 3$? The left-nav is great - I like it, users who don't can disable it. Perfect world. Now it's stickied it's always there too, which is really useful.  When I'm navigating in areas not directly linked to in the left nav and have scrolled down, I often want to re-use the other navigation. This means scrolling up. Which is fine, of course it's how websites work.  However, if the left-nav had a "Top" link which took the user to the very top of the page it would be great for getting back to specific contextual menus and things that are not linked to in the left-nav.  For example, if I'm viewing questions on a specific tag and I've scrolled down, I sometimes want to get back up to the top to remove a tag, or change from "Latest" to "Featured" etc. Although clicking the "Questions" link in the left-nav takes me back to the top, it removes the tag(s) I was searching with.  There are other use cases where this would be useful, like long questions and answers (Etc). So I think a "Top" link in the left nav would be very useful.    I think this is different to the  as it doesn't mention the left-nav, and my question is suggesting this idea because we have a good place to put it and it'll be a useful addition to the left-nav. Requested value 'CheckBoxes' was not found There's a weird thing happening with my Windows application. I have created a Sharepoint utility to automate the creation of content-types and site-columns. At a point where I try to get my available fields, I get this error:     An unhandled exception of type 'Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.ServerException' occurred in Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.Runtime.dll   Additional information: Requested value 'CheckBoxes' was not found.   It is throwing an exception at:  ClientContext clientContxt = new ClientContext(clientContext.Url);         clientContext.Credentials = clientContext.Credentials;         Web web = clientContext.Web;          clientContext.Load(web, w =&gt; w.AvailableFields);         clientContext.ExecuteQuery(); //**exception thrown here**   Kindly please suggest what is wrong here? Present or Past tense to describe a past condition which is still present? Scenario: My friend John has a personality disorder, intensely paranoid for example.  Can I say:     There were three events last year that told me John had a problem.   or can I say:     There were threee events last year that told me John has a problem. If $[G' : G'']\leq p^2$, then $G'$ is abelian. Problem : Let $G$ be a p-group and $G'$ denote the commutator subgroup of $G$. If $[G' : G'']\leq p^2$, then $G'$ is abelian.  It is easy to prove it for the case of $[G' : G'']=1$ since G is solvable. But it is too hard to prove the other cases. Please give me any advice or solutions. Thanks in advance. Root of continuous function using Rolle's Theorem $$f(x)= 1 + e^x\cos(x)$$   $$g(x)= 1 + e^x\sin(x)$$      Show that there is at least one root of $g$ between two roots of $f$   How do I start to answer this question and do I need to use Intermediate Value Theorem? Is it possible to "upgrade" from a 32bit to a 64bit installation? As per title, I wish to know if I can, after a successful 32bit setup and consequent software installations, update to a 64bit version.  I know how to partition (actually one of the solutions is to set /, /etc, /home, /var/www, and /opt as separate partitions) and I know that a clean install is way better than a dirty one, yet I would like to know if/how it's possible to do that. How should I install HPLIP binary/proprietary plugin/driver for my HP printer or printer+scanner? Let's assume that one has some modern HP printer and/or scanner which is  supported by HPLIP package from official repository. Or supported by newer version of HPLIP package (see  about installation).  From official documentation () it is known that device needs proprietary/binary driver or plugin.  How should one install such plugin? How To Delete This Red Box on My Screen? I was editing my mesh and I wanted to only see a part of my mesh, so I pressed alt+B to only show a selected area. However, I did ctrl+B and created a red rectangle on my screen (I don't know what it does). Does anybody know how to get it off? Proof of lack of pure prime producing polynomials. I recently encountered this following proposition:  For every polynomial, there is some positive integer for which it is composite.  What is the most elementary proof of this? I am looking for an English translation of Markov's 1958 paper, On insolubility of the homeorphy problem, which I remember coming across on a website for a computational topology course (taught by Afra Zomorodian).