Italic correction fails when putting \textit into a custom command
Space after LaTeX commands
For what values $s$ does $\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x^s}dx$ converge? For what values $s$ does $\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x^s}dx$ converge?  Solution says $0&lt;s&lt;2$.  Any ideas? DML Statement in ‘after trigger’ and not in ‘before trigger’? Bluetooth Broadcom 43142 isn't working Bluetooth is on but can't find or be found by any other devices.  Output of sudo service bluetooth status:  ● bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service    Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)    Active: active (running) since ხუთ 2015-06-04 22:33:18 GET; 13min ago  Main PID: 26678 (bluetoothd)    CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service            └─26678 /usr/sbin/bluetoothd -n  ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/HFPAG ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/HFPHS ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/A2DPSource ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/A2DPSink ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/HFPAG ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/HFPHS ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/A2DPSource ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/A2DPSink ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Adapter /org/bluez/26678/hci0 has been enabled ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Adapter /org/bluez/26678/hci0 has been enabled   Output of lsusb:  Bus 003 Device 005: ID 0a5c:21d7 Broadcom Corp. BCM43142 Bluetooth 4.0   How can I fix it? Enclosing Page Numbers using the `Backref=Pages` Extension of `Hyperref` I have a Canon 550D with 70-200 f4 and 50mm prime lenses. Although the camera has built-in 9 focal points, I sometimes face a strange problem. Here's a sample photo:    In reference to the above pic, you can see that both of the faces are NOT in focus. I used 70-200 f4 for this shot at max aperture. Still, I couldn't get both of them in focus. Why? I also try decreasing the aperture to attain a greater DoF but still, I couldn't get both of them into focus.  Another thing: Although the cam has 9 focal points, why can't I use all of them to focus, say, 9 points in a portrait shot? In manual mode, it has the option to select one of the 9 focal points. And in auto mode, it sometimes select more than one focal points.  This is just an example image. I've faced this problem zillions of times. I've come across quite a few answers that request the asker to, for example: "send the user an email", after which the answerer will provide them with the code or other resources they're looking for.  A few examples:          Should we take action against these questions?  I feel like these answers aren't appropriate (see my answer below).  Update:  Perhaps there are some cases where this is acceptable. I've seen a few questions regarding a particular piece of commercial software where the author/developer of the software answers, telling the asker to contact either them or their organization's in-house support.  I'm on the fence about this case. If I came across a question here describing a similar problem I was having, it would be useful to me to have the support information and know that I could contact it for assistance.  I'm interested in others' opinions on this situation in particular. What differentiates the scientific method from other methods From the controversy in , I would like to know what differentiates "the scientific method" from other method.  I'm asking for differentiation, rather than a definition, because definitions call for an all encompassing answer, which is often hard to find.  If someone asks "what is an alternative to the scientific method," I would like to be able to start by being able to reliably say whether a particular method is the scientific method or not.  Of course, being a linguistic issue, the definitions of words themselves are flexible.  For instance, it is not uncommon to hear one in science talk of "truth" in a sense which is incompatable with the mathematical meaning of "truth."  Accordingly, I would like to stick to the following ideals in wording whenever possible:   Prefer mathematically accurate terminology.  Ideally the word "proof" should be used in the form found in proof theory, and "true" and "false" should be used in the form of Boolean algebra.   No method should claim a hypothesis which predicts the state of the future is "true" unless they claim soothsaying abilities (most scientific theories include a random variable to avoid needing to claim soothsaying abilities... this is legitimate)  Words which imply direction should be clarified carefully.  "Good" and "bad" are notoriously difficult, but phrases such as "advancing society" can also be very tricky as well. The physical world and the world of information theory should be treated differently.  In particular, the concept of "testing a hypothesis" will likely need to be broken down into testing and observing the physical world, taking measurements (which should have errors associated with them), and only then is the hypothesis compared against the results of the measurements. Mathematically extending arguments into infinity (such as claiming some specific cellular level learning process qualifies as the scientific method) are valid, but may rapidly make it harder to distinguish non-scientific methods from scientific ones.  Such claims should be made carefully, but they are not inherently invalid.   If these ideals are too strict, you may bend them, but you should qualify such choices with an explanation of why my recommended wording choices are too strict.  Their goal is to put different methodologies on the levelest playing fields that I can manage in this medium.  Being stack exchange, bonus points for references to existing theories, though you may need to paraphrase their results to fit with the ideals I'm recommending for these answers.  Answers may be tested two ways:   Positive: If we think something is the scientific method, does it meet the requirements set forth? Negative: If we think something is not the scientific method, does the answer explain why it is not? Low-RAM Linux Distro Specifically for serving static sites I'm looking for a near-zero-configuration linux distro that is designed specifically for serving static web sites and nothing else on a low-RAM machine (I'm planning on 128MB, but the option of less would be nice).  Any ideas of a linux distro specifically tuned for serving static sites in a small footprint? How do I use variables in a sed command? I tried the following code to replace QQ with ZZ, but it doesn't do what I want:  var1=QQ sed -i 's/$var1/ZZ/g' $file   However, this code does what I want:  sed -i 's/QQ/ZZ/g' $file   How do I use variables in sed? Which one is correct to say: "It's me" or "It's I"? I was taught at school that the following expression is not grammatically correct:  Who is there? It's me.  The correct one is:  Who is there? It's I.  Can you let me know which one is accurate? How to use a special character as a normal one in Unix shells? Many questions like 'How to type the double-quote char (")?' are being asked, and we don't want to clutter our community with the same answer (Type it as \" if not enclosed in 's, " if enclosed in 's.) So, the question is here.   You can't type special chars into a terminal like normal ones, e.g. this command will fail:  echo Updates (11)   So, how to type in these chars in the terminal as if they were normal ones?  !#$^&amp;*?[](){}&lt;&gt;~;'"\|&lt;space&gt;&lt;tab&gt;&lt;newline&gt; I'm using pdflatex, and use \includegraphics to include content of figures from PDF. PDF are exported from InkScape.  \begin{figure} [!h]     \centering     \includegraphics[height=3cm]{fig/SUSAN.pdf} \end{figure}   Included PDF or source SVG has same colors. Green has always RGB value (0, 255, 0). Problem occurs when I include this files from LaTeX. In output PDF on some pages colorspace is darker. Even same image on other page has different colourity.  My PDF  . As you can see on page 7 (11 in PDF) USAN areas are bright green, but then on page 5 (9 in PDF) are green points on corners more darker. Idiom for a speech with redundant information How do I monitor the computer's CPU, memory, and disk usage in Java? Why Doesn't the Adamantium Bone Covering Kill Wolverine? I've seen the  here before, as well as on many sites on the web.  I've also seen different info on what was covered.  I'm not a huge X-Men fan, but I do enjoy the characters and stories, so I know I'm probably missing out on a lot, and may have missed the obvious along the way because I didn't read a particular series or something like that.  I had a relative die from leukemia a few years ago and that reminded me of basic junior high science: that red and white blood cells are produced in the bone marrow and must be able to reach from the marrow into the blood vessels.  The leukemia my relative had was the kind where the "bad" cells would surround the marrow and prevent the new "good" blood cells from getting out to the rest of the body.  So just how much of Wolverine's skeleton is covered with Adamantium?  If it's the whole thing, there'd have to be openings for new red blood cells to get out if he is to remain alive.  I've never seen a reference to this issue, is it ever addressed?  That also raises another issue along the same line: Are hard to reach areas, such as ball and socket joints covered?  If not, then stress on other covered areas could be transferred to the weaker uncovered areas, which would lead to breakage there.  And if joints like that are covered, is there anything to say how it was done?  Are there openings or gaps in the Adamantium covering on his body?  Are there any references to any of these issues that deal with them? How do I rip audio from a DVD? If I run a randomForest model, I can then make predictions based on the model.  Is there a way to get a prediction interval of each of the predictions such that I know how "sure" the model is of its answer.  If this is possible is it simply based on the variability of the dependent variable for the whole model or will it have wider and narrower intervals depending on the particular decision tree that was followed for a particular prediction? Find $\min(\operatorname{trace}(AA^T))$ for invertible $A_{n\times n}$ For invertible $A_{n\times n}$ find $\min(\operatorname{trace}(AA^T))$  (a) $0$ (b) $1$ (c) $n$ (d) $n^2$  Clearly for $A=I$, it is $n$, and I am unable to get any lower values, but how do I prove it. Comma use with nonessential appositives Sorry, I do not know the language terminology. Is this a case of nonessential appositive?  Which of the following sentence has a correct comma use? Comma before &quot;should&quot;  Importantly, two frail subgroups of stroke population, long-term residential care and cognitive impairment patients, should not be excluded from the rehabilitation.  No comma before &quot;should&quot;  Importantly, two frail subgroups of stroke population, long-term residential care and cognitive impairment patients should not be excluded from the rehabilitation. What is the benefit of breaking up a continuous predictor variable? I'm wondering what the value is in taking a continuous predictor variable and breaking it up (e.g., into quintiles), before using it in a model.   It seems to me that by binning the variable we lose information.   Is this just so we can model non-linear effects?  If we kept the variable continuous and it wasn't really a straight linear relationship would we need to come up with some kind of curve to best fit the data?