Ubuntu Download for Intel System
Is the 64-Bit version of Ubuntu only compatible with AMD CPUs?
I am looking for a single word for a person who is able to explain himself very clearly and using the best possible words, etc. I am not looking for "perspicuous", etc. The focus is more on the language part: someone who uses the right language and words to describe himself. I know the word exists but its just skipping my head at the moment!!! Please help. How to enable MySQL client auto re-connect with MySQLdb? I came across PHP way of doing the trick:  my_bool reconnect = 1; mysql_options(&amp;mysql, MYSQL_OPT_RECONNECT, &amp;reconnect);   but no luck with MySQLdb (python-mysql).  Can anybody please give a clue? Thanks. Redirect output from all commands to file, not just last What's the difference between align and align*? After some brief searching I can't find the difference between align and align*. Google summarily ignoring the * is making it harder I think.  Can you tell me the difference between these two?  Moreover, can you tell me where you generally go for this type of information? As a relatively new user I'm still building up my resources. When to use IMG vs. CSS background-image? In what situations is it more appropriate to use an HTML IMG tag to display an image, as opposed to a CSS background-image, and vice-versa?  Factors may include accessibility, browser support, dynamic content, or any kind of technical limits or usability principles. Importing a material from blender to unity For example, this regex  (.*)&lt;FooBar&gt;   will match:  abcde&lt;FooBar&gt;   But how do I get it to match across multiple lines?  abcde fghij&lt;FooBar&gt; I haven't seen this behavior out in the wild much, but it happened again recently and I was wondering if a flag could be automatically raised when this happens:   User posts answer Answer is down voted User deletes answer User posts exact same text as a new answer User effectively ditched down votes   Got down voted again? Wash, rinse and repeat. Profit (perhaps after modifying the post, which is what you should have done to begin with)    I feel that this should raise a duplicate content flag, with slightly stronger wording. Would this be possible to implement? Or, perhaps, don't let users post new answers if they have a deleted answer to a question. Rather, force them to edit and restore the deleted answer instead, unless locked by a moderator.  I do have a link, but I don't want a lot of people to descend on it and create an even bigger disruption. It happened exactly as I described. Changing url of exposed filter When I used an exposed filter the filter selection is passed as name/value pair in the url, for example:  members?field_a=valuea&amp;field_b=valueb   How can I set it up to use more of a "pathauto" style url:  members/valuea/valueb Find $\lim_{n\to \infty}({1\over \sqrt{n^2+1}}+{1\over \sqrt{n^2+2}}+\cdots+{1\over \sqrt{n^2+n}})$ strong textFind $\lim_\limits{n\to \infty}\left({1\over \sqrt{n^2+1}}+{1\over \sqrt{n^2+2}}+\cdots+{1\over \sqrt{n^2+n}}\right)$. I do know it is bounded by $1$. I tried using the sandwich rule with no success. How can I solve it? How to disable Ctrl+Shift+U? How to show $(mn)!$ is divisible by $(m!)^n$? How to show $(mn)!$ divides $(m!)^n$, $m$ and $n$ is integers? My SoulSeek client Nicotine+ checks my open ports during initial configuration and promts that the one port number it needs is closed, cutting me off frmo about 50% of the users. Is there anyway I can open that particular port for the application to use?  RUnning ubuntu desktop 13.04. I have not manually installed any firewalls, but not sure if its included in the default installation. Context to distinguish "we" inclusive versus exclusive New three-tiered badge idea: Explainer →Refiner → Illuminator The difference between a poor or meh question and a stellar question can often simply be someone understanding it and providing it a great answer. I can't begin to count the number of times I've justified re-opening a question as a moderator by saying:     Look at the answer it got, though. This isn't something we want deleted, this is something we want fixed, because it's obviously valuable. Someone with domain knowledge can easily edit that question based on the answer it received.   This doesn't only apply to borderline-poor or poor questions – sometimes a good edit means the difference between 100 and 10,000 people finding something through typing things into Google. Good titles are hard.   We think we've come up with a way to provide incentive for good, opportunistic edits to happen more often, ideally without questions needing to go through closure or collecting a centimeter of dust before they do. What if we simply rewarded folks that answered and edited questions with a special, relatively difficult to earn badge?  Let's say that you answer something, and:   You edit the question 12 hours before or after answering it. This allows you to edit now, answer later &mdash; or answer now and edit later, when you have the time. Your edit isn't rolled back, or outright rejected if it was a suggested edit The question is not closed for any reason, even simply being a duplicate Your answer has a score of 1 or higher   &hellip; then you've done something that we probably want to recognize. You understood something, you provided the knowledge that you have, and then you provided an edit to make sure that more people in need of this knowledge can find it, while raising the overall quality of the site.  Here's the proposed tiers for the badge (within the above stated criteria):   Explainer (Bronze): Answered &amp; edited 10  questions Refiner (Silver): Answered &amp; edited 50 questions Illuminator (Gold): Answered &amp; edited 500 questions   We think this is going to be pretty hard to game. You can't go leaving streaks of terse snark all over the place on questions you know are going to be closed anyway, and junk edits aren't going to fly.  We're talking about rewarding folks that take a tiny bit more time out of their day just to write a more descriptive title so that folks can find the awesome answer that they wrote. Just doing that alone can make a big difference. Sure, it's a tad hard to get at the gold level, but it's supposed to be. If you routinely edit questions that you answer and have done so for some time, you'd probably get it the day we roll it out.  While this is technically something that we came up with on the quality initiative ( | ) &mdash; this badge could be earned on all of our sites.  What do you think? What did we miss? What could be better about the idea? We have a few Win32 applications (coded in Delphi 2006) where sometimes the user gets an error message saying "System Error. Code: 8. Not enough storage is available to process this command.".  From the stacktrace it looks like it is always during CreateWnd call  Main ($1edc): 004146cc +070 app.exe SysUtils               RaiseLastOSError 00414655 +005 app.exe SysUtils               RaiseLastOSError 004ce44c +130 app.exe Controls               TWinControl.CreateWnd 00535a72 +022 app.exe cxControls             TcxControl.CreateWnd 004ce82a +016 app.exe Controls               TWinControl.CreateHandle 00553d21 +005 app.exe cxContainer            TcxContainer.CreateHandle 00586ef1 +005 app.exe cxEdit                 TcxCustomEdit.CreateHandle 005c331d +005 app.exe cxDropDownEdit         TcxCustomDropDownEdit.CreateHandle 004ceaf0 +074 app.exe Controls               TWinControl.UpdateShowing 004ceb1e +0a2 app.exe Controls               TWinControl.UpdateShowing 004cebdc +03c app.exe Controls               TWinControl.UpdateControlState 004d118a +026 app.exe Controls               TWinControl.CMVisibleChanged 004cb713 +2bb app.exe Controls               TControl.WndProc 004cf569 +499 app.exe Controls               TWinControl.WndProc 004b727d +4c1 app.exe Forms                  TCustomForm.WndProc 004cb3a0 +024 app.exe Controls               TControl.Perform 004c9f6a +026 app.exe Controls               TControl.SetVisible 004b6c46 +03a app.exe Forms                  TCustomForm.SetVisible 004baf1b +007 app.exe Forms                  TCustomForm.Show 004bb151 +14d app.exe Forms                  TCustomForm.ShowModal 007869c7 +0d3 app.exe UfrmPrice      770 +19 TfrmPrice.EditPrice 0078655d +009 app.exe UfrmPrice      628  +0 TfrmPrice.actNewBidExecute 00431ce7 +00f app.exe Classes                TBasicAction.Execute 004c2cb5 +031 app.exe ActnList               TContainedAction.Execute 004c397c +050 app.exe ActnList               TCustomAction.Execute 00431bb3 +013 app.exe Classes                TBasicActionLink.Execute 004af384 +090 app.exe Menus                  TMenuItem.Click 004b059f +013 app.exe Menus                  TMenu.DispatchCommand 004b16fe +082 app.exe Menus                  TPopupList.WndProc 004b164d +01d app.exe Menus                  TPopupList.MainWndProc 004329a8 +014 app.exe Classes                StdWndProc 7e4196b2 +00a USER32.dll                     DispatchMessageA 004bea60 +0fc app.exe Forms                  TApplication.ProcessMessage 004bea9a +00a app.exe Forms                  TApplication.HandleMessage 004becba +096 app.exe Forms                  TApplication.Run 008482c5 +215 app.exe AppName        129 +42 initialization   I've never been able to get to the bottom of what causes this and as it happens fairly seldom I haven't been to concerned, but I would like to find out what causes it and hopefully rectify it...  EDIT: Full Stacktrace  EDIT 2: More info... The client who experienced this today has had my app installed for about 4 months and it is running on his PC 8 hours a day. The problem only appeared today and kept reappearing even though he killed my app and restarted it. None of the other apps on his system behaved strangely. After a reboot the problem goes away completely. Does this point towards the heap shortage that Steve mentions?  EDIT 3: Interesting msdn blog post  and  on the topic of the desktop heap. Though I'm not sure whether this is the cause of the problem it certainly looks likely. Opening a file with std::string Dynamic Object Intellisense How to add a guest account without a password? This question is a bit more subjective, but I'm hoping to get some new perspective.  I'm so used to designing for certain screen size (typically 1024x768) that I find that size to not be a problem.  Expanding the size to 1280x1024 doesn't buy you enough screen real estate to make an appreciable difference, but will give me a little more breathing room.  Basically, I just expand my "grid size" and the same basic design for the slightly smaller screen still works.  However, in the last couple of projects, my clients were all using 1080p (1920x1080) screens and they wanted solutions to use as much of that real estate as possible.  1920 pixels across provides just under twice the width I am used to, and the widescreen makes some of my old go to design approaches not to work as well.  The problem I'm running into is that when presented with so much space, I'm confronted with some major problems.   How many columns should I use?  The wide-format lends itself to a 3 column split with a 2:1:1 split (i.e. the content column bigger than the other two).  However, if I go with three columns what do I do with that extra column? How do I make efficient use of the screen real estate?  There's a temptation to put everything on the screen at once, but too much information actually makes the application harder to use.  White space is important to help make sense of complex information, but too much makes related concepts look too separate. I'm usually working with web applications that have complex data, and visualization and presentation is key to making sense of the raw data.  When your user also has a large screen (at least 24"), some information is out of eyesight and you need to move the pointer a long distance. How do you make sure everything that's needed stays within the visual hot points? Simple sites like blogs actually do better when the width is constrained, which results in a lot of wasted real estate.  I kind of wonder if having the text box and the text preview side by side would be a big benefit for the admin side of that type of screen? (1:1 two-column split).   For your answers, I know almost everything in the design is "it depends".  What I'm looking for is:   General principles you use How your approach to design has changed   I'm finding that I have to retrain myself how to work with this different format.  Every bump in the resolution I've worked through to date has been about 25%: 640 to 800 (25% increase), 800 to 1024 (28% increase), and 1024 to 1280 (25% increase).  However, the jump from 1280 to 1920 is a good 50% increase in space--the equivalent from jumping from 640 straight to 1024.  There was no commonly used middle size to help learn lessons more gradually.    To help focus the question a little bit, I had a project that was somewhat similar to Atlassian JIRA, an issue management system.  There were about six different types of records the client wanted to keep, all of them could potentially be related to each other.  Gathering data wasn't the core problem, although it did play a part.  The more important side of the problem was creating a system which would suggest potential relationships between the records and helped the analysts recognize patterns in the reported incidents.  There were different types of analysts that focused on the different problem domains, and due to the nature of their exploratory type of work, they didn't know what they wanted.  They just knew they had to make sense of a lot of data, draw correlations, and characterize classes of issues.    (Originally asked here: , but told that this might be more appropriate)    For the bounty: Stretch your minds a bit.  The pat answer "Make everything bigger" has a limit to how useful the answer is.  We are talking about users who have to make sense of a lot of data and find relationships between records.  If I simply bump up the size on everything they are going to be very limited in what they can see on the screen--particularly because the vertical is so constrained.