Run beta versions of sites SEO safely
SEO safe way to run beta of new site on seperate domain
What is a Windows Handle? What's the correct usage of "hopefully"? K-means - comparing solutions with SSwithin elbow-method: minimum "too early", or non-monotonic curve Files greater than 1 GB and older than 6 months I want to find files which are greater than 1 GB and older than 6 months in entire server. How to write a command for this? What off-camera flash solution should I use with an entry-level Nikon? Interpretation of simple predictions to odds ratios in logistic regression I'm somewhat new to using logistic regression, and a bit confused by a discrepancy between  my interpretations of the following values which I thought would be the same:    exponentiated beta values  predicted probability of the outcome using beta values.    Here is a simplified version of the model I am using, where undernutrition and insurance are both binary, and wealth is continuous:  Under.Nutrition ~ insurance + wealth   My (actual) model returns an exponentiated beta value of .8 for insurance, which I would interpret as:     "The probability of being undernourished for an insured individual is .8 times the probability of being undernourished for an uninsured individual."   However, when I calculate the difference in probabilities for individuals by putting in values of 0 and 1 into the insurance variable and the mean value for wealth, the difference in undernutrition is only .04. That is calculated as follows:   Probability Undernourished = exp(β0 + β1*Insurance + β2*Wealth) /                              (1+exp(β0 + β1*Insurance + β2*wealth))   I would really appreciate it if someone could explain why these values are different, and what a better interpretation (particularly for the second value) might be.     Further Clarification Edits As I understand it, the probability of being under-nourished for an uninsured person (where B1 corresponds to insurance) is:  Prob(Unins) = exp(β0 + β1*0 + β2*Wealth) /               (1+exp(β0 + β1*0+ β2*wealth))   While the Probability of being under-nourished for an insured person is:  Prob(Ins)= exp(β0 + β1*1 + β2*Wealth) /            (1+exp(β0 + β1*1+ β2*wealth))   The odds of being undernourished for an uninsured person compared to an insured person is:  exp(B1)   Is there a way to translate between these values (mathematically)? I'm still a bit confused by this equation (where I should probably be a different value on the RHS):  Prob(Ins) - Prob(Unins) != exp(B)   In layman's terms, the question is why doesn't insuring an individual change their probability of being under-nourished as much as the odds ratio indicates it does?  In my data, Prob(Ins) - Prob(Unins) = .04, where the exponentiated beta value is .8 (so why is the difference not .2?) How many distinct ways to climb stairs in 1 or 2 steps at a time? (Fibonacci puzzle) There is a very interesting puzzle for Fibonacci sequence:     You are climbing a stair case. It takes n steps to reach to the top. Each time you can either climb $1$ or $2$ steps. In how many distinct ways can you climb to the top?   The answer is Fibonacci sequence: $F(n) = F(n - 1) + F(n - 2)$. The explanation is that you could reach the $n$th step either from the $(n - 1)$th step or $(n - 2)$th step.  What I fail to understand is why isn't the answer $F(n) = (F(n - 1) + 1) + (F(n - 2) + 2)$. Since, after reaching $(n - 1)$th step I have to take $1$ step to reach the $n$th step and after reaching $(n - 2)$th step I have to take another $2$ steps to reach the $n$th step.  I know I might be ignoring some very stupid detail but it's better to ask and be called a fool once than to remain a fool forever. Best Place to put Feature Requests? What does echelon mean? When you solve a system of linear equations, you write down the augmented matrix and reduce this to reduced row echelon form. What is the meaning of the word echelon? Disable the "You've gone full screen" notification in Chrome User's suspension period has expired, but they're still suspended? I came across a user with a notification that states:     This account is temporarily suspended network-wide. The suspension period ends on Dec 2 '18 at 2:35.   Screencap for posterity:    Unless this user is  (in which case the full year should be shown, or at least a tooltip), it seems like they should have been unbanned 4 months ago. Double Sideband Suppressed Carrier modulator List I am using ring modulator for DSB-SC  am modulation in a transmitter circuit. Can anyone please tell me about more DSB SC modulator for am modulation? I want to know which one to use where? Why "would" instead of "will" in this sentence? The goal for these negotiations is to reach a mutually-agreed long-term comprehensive solution that would ensure Iranˈs nuclear program will be exclusively peaceful.    what does would imply here? If it implies future, why will has not been used?  A good link teaching would thoroughly would be really appreciated. Specially, distinguishing between the senses of would is not always easy. I posted a question which was closed as off-topic and it seems like it could fit on another site in the network. How can I go about moving it there?   What is migration? When can a question be migrated, and who can migrate it? When should I consider migration, and when is it inappropriate? What causes a migration to be blocked and what happens after? What causes a migration to be rejected and what happens after? Anything else I should know about migration? Pre-1980s Sci-fi movie about killer aliens Getting "'file' is different from the same file on the system" when I attempt to update through synaptic Can't find wifi drivers for 0bda:f179 Realtek Semiconductor Corp I'm trying to install wifi drivers for a particular mini wifi card i bought. The output of lsusb is:  0bda:f179 Realtek Semiconductor Corp   I've searched everywhere for drivers, but could not find anything. Any help?  Thanks New passport and entrance Schengen I am from Brazil and travel a lot in Schengen countries. Under the rules of Schengen visa (3 months stay in a 6 months period). In my passport are the entrance and exit stamps, also to chec the days I stay in Schengen.  I need a new passport and will get this in Brazil. So in this new passport are NOT the stamps. Does this mean I start new with the Schengen visa rule? I seems like. The new passport is empty. Or do I miss something? It would be great because I am almost on my 90 days stay in the period of 180 days. Suppose the default shell for my account is zsh but I opened the terminal and fired up bash and executed a script named prac002.sh, which shell interpreter would be used to execute the script, zsh or bash? Consider the following example:  papagolf@Sierra ~/My Files/My Programs/Learning/Shell % sudo cat /etc/passwd | grep papagolf [sudo] password for papagolf:  papagolf:x:1000:1001:Rex,,,:/home/papagolf:/usr/bin/zsh # papagolf's default shell is zsh  papagolf@Sierra ~/My Files/My Programs/Learning/Shell % bash # I fired up bash. (See that '%' prompt in zsh changes to '$' prompt, indicating bash.)  papagolf@Sierra:~/My Files/My Programs/Learning/Shell$ ./prac002.sh  Enter username : Rex Rex # Which interpreter did it just use?   **EDIT : ** Here's the content of the script  papagolf@Sierra ~/My Files/My Programs/Learning/Shell % cat ./prac002.sh  read -p "Enter username : " uname echo $uname Restricing domains for universal and existential quantifiers I am currently using Rosen's "Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications" (7th ed.) for my discrete mathematics course. We recently talked about quantifiers, more specifically the universal and existential quantifier. What confuses me is when we started talking about restricting the domain (i.e. instead of all real numbers, only all real positive numbers), where does the conditional statement come from when restricting the domain of a universal quantifier and where does the conjunction come from when restricting the domain of a existential quantifier?  This link did help:   However, the part that confuses here is how are the domains restricted in the answer given in the link above?