Install 14.04 LTS from 11.04
How do I install Ubuntu?
We are sponsoring a family to visit us in UK as friends from Madagascar for two weeks. They have a 6 year old and a 16 month old.   Do the kids need their own visas, and are they the standard visitor visa or a special child visa?   Also, when I try and apply on the website I can only apply for one person so how do I apply for all the individuals in the family?   I have looked on the Immigration website and can't find the answers I need. I've read a number of the helpful Q&amp;As on photons that mention the mass/mass-less issue. Do I understand correctly that the idea of mass-less (a rest mass of 0) may be just a convention to make the equations work?  From a layperson's view, it's difficult to understand how a particle of light (photon) can be mass-less. A physical object (everyday world-large or quantum-small) must have a mass. Yet, if my understanding is correct, the mass of a moving object/particle increases in proportion to its speed/velocity...so that at the speed of light, its mass would be infinite. A photon travels at the speed of light, but it obviously doesn't have infinite mass, right? Can someone formulate a practical explanation that can be understood by middle-school to high school kids? Much thanks for the help.    Wow--your answers to my original Q below clear up much of my confusion. I now have the daunting task of going over these nuggets and working up an equation-less (hopefully) explanation of the mass-less photon for non-physicist types.  Yes, from a layperson's view, it does seem remarkable that an existing piece of matter-- which has to be made of physical substance--could have zero mass at rest (though a photon is never at rest). It would be almost understandable if a piece of matter made of nothing had zero mass, but that  seems to be an oxymoron, and "nothing" would equate to nonexistent, right?  In case you might find it interesting: I'm working on a writing project that posits we inhabit a universe that consists of matter (physical stuff) only, and that the NON-physical (aka supernatural) does not (and cannot) exist. For instance, if a purported supernatural phenomenon is found to actually exist, then by definition, its existence is proof that it is mundane/natural. All it would take to disprove this premise is reliable proof that ONE supernatural event has occurred. Despite thousands of such claims, that's never yet happened.  Who else better than physicists to confirm my premise? However, I do wish the TV physicists would explain the terms they throw about, some of which mislead/confuse their lay viewers. Case in point: "The universe is made up of matter and energy" (without properly defining the term "energy" as a property of matter).  The result is that laypersons are left with the impression that energy must therefore be something apart from or independent of matter (ie, nonphysical). Their use of the term "pure energy" without specifying exactly what that means adds to the confusion. (Thanks to your replies on this forum, I now understand that "pure energy" refers to photon particles.) However, "psychics" and other charlatans take advantage of such confusion by hijacking terms like energy (as in "psychic energy"), frequencies, vibrations, etc to give perceived scientific legitimacy to their claims that a supernatural spirit world, etc., exists. As you may realize, the majority of people in the US (per 2009 Harris Poll) and around the world believe in the existence of nonphysical/supernatural stuff such as ghosts and spirits.  My purpose is to give laypersons the information they need to distinguish what's real from what's not.  Thanks so much for help...And, PLEASE, add any further comments you think might be helpful/insightful to better inform laypersons. Shannon confusion and diffusion concept I read the document(not the whole document) from Shannon where he speaks about the concepts of confusion and diffusion. I read in many places(not in the document but around the internet) that confusion is enforced using substitution. Diffusion is enforced using permutation/transposition. Ciphers must use both of them because either confusion or diffusion alone are not enough. I read that a substitution cipher can apply by itself confusion(only). Permutation/Transposition applies by itself diffusion(only). It's precisely the last case that bothers me: Can a permutation/transposition cipher by itself apply diffusion?  Shannon explains diffusion as a property that spreads statistic properties of text all over the text preventing statistic analysis. It's frequently translated to: an alteration to a plaintext symbol affects many cipher text symbols. Assuming permutation of bits or characters, how can diffusion be achieved by simple permutation? I mean, if you permute bits, there will be no other bits affected. But if you consider a symbol a character and you permute bits, a change in a character will affect many other characters. It's a question of what is a symbol.  I also read versions of this diffusion concept where the point was just changing bits order just to avoid pattern analysis of the text. But, where is the avalanche effect in simple permutation?  So, what is the correct definition and the implications of diffusion?  I hope you understand what is troubling me.  Thank you once more By accident, I recently removed some videos from my phone. I tried to restoring them with Recuva and TuneUp Utilities and the results were "undf" files.  I tried to open with VLC, Media Player Classic and other video players to no avail. Where/how do I find out the codec for these files?   I would really love to be able to watch these videos again. I’m running Ubuntu 14.04. When I run:   sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa   I get the following error:  sudo: add-apt-repository: command not found   I tried to run  sudo apt-get install software-properties-common   but it shows:  software-properties-common is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. I have just installed 12.04 LTS on my laptop and I'm kinda new in this. I am required to write some program in Fortran 77 and I need a Fortran 77 compiler. I have tried installing g77 as described in the Ubuntu website but was unable to do so. I have typed in the following in terminal:  sudo apt-get install g77   and get the following:  Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done Package g77 is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source  E: Package 'g77' has no installation candidate   May I know what is the problem? I have tried searching g77 in the software center but apparently it is not there. Does this mean it is not available for 12.04?  I'm currently using an Asus K43S laptop with Intel Core i5-2450M processor and my Ubuntu is installed alongside Windows. How can black hole increase its mass? What is the probability that $x_1+x_2+...+x_n \le n$? How to switch between tty and xorg session Sum of real numbers that multiply to 1 I've seen a question in my math book with this explanation above it: "If the product of n positive real numbers is 1, then the sum of these numbers must be more than n". I was wondering if this is correct, and if it is, could someone give an explanation or a proof for it? How to get a list of appendices? How to get a list of appendices like the list of figures and list of tables? How to set it on a separate page, like the list of figures and list of tables? Do quest items weigh anything? Someone said that quest items don't count against your carrying capacity in Skyrim, even if they have a weight listed. Is this false? What is the reasoning behind the design decision to allow users to create a display name which matches another existing users exactly?    This is opposed to the common practice of enforcing unique user names, and I'd really like to learn something. Equation System with 3 variables "Find all the possible solutions $(x,y,z) \in$  $\Bbb R$ that satisfies the following equation system".  My teacher gave me this problem and i got some clues in how to solve it. I evaluated $1$ and $-1$ and i got these solutions $(1,-1,1)$ and $(-1,-1,-1)$. I think these are the only ones but i can't prove it.  Am i wrong?, are there more solutions?.   Thanks  $$ \left\{  \begin{array}{c} x+y-z=-1 \\  x^2-y^2+z^2=1\\  -x^3+y^3+z^3=-1 \end{array} \right.  $$ Inequality involving the integral of vector valued function Suppose $f :[a,b]\to \mathbb{R}^n$ is given by $f(t)=\langle f_1(t), \ldots, f_n(t)\rangle$, where each of the $n$ component functions is integrable over $[a,b]$. I think the following inequality   $$\left|\int _a^b f(t) \, dt\right|\leq\int_a^b\left|f(t)\right| \, dt$$  still hold but I don't know how to prove it. Any idea?  Thanks SHA-256 "almost unique"? I have seen numerous references on the internet of people describing SHA-256 as generating an "almost unique" hash.  . there are more.  Is there some mathematical basis to the almost uniqueness? I would have thought that as SHA-256 is an evenly-distibuted (?) hash algorithm which can accept any message (infinitely many) as an input and produces a fixed length (finite) hash - then there will in fact be an infinite number of each possible output - which I would think hardly qualifies as "almost unique".  Is there a basis for this statement? Should I let potential employers know I have a job offer? I've interviewed for a few positions, one of which has made me an offer.  I'm very pleased with the offer, but I prefer some of the other positions.  I have the luxury of being able to take a lot of time to decide whether or not I accept this offer, so I'm certain I will hear back (either positively or negatively) from the other positions before a decision is required for the offer I've received.  I'm trying to decide between two courses of action, and I want to choose the one that will best help my candidacy with the positions I've yet to hear from.  Plan 1 is to do nothing and simply wait to hear back from the other positions for which I've already interviewed.  Plan 2 is to be in touch with the other positions to let them know I have an offer, and ask where I stand with them.  Would Plan 2 make me a more desirable candidate with the other positions, as they might see my offer as further validation of my credentials?  Or, might initiating with the interviewers in this way be detrimental to my candidacy, perhaps making me seem pushy or self-centered?  If so, I would rather just wait for them to run their course of action (Plan 1).  As I've said, I have plenty of time, so I don't want impatience to hurt me.  If there is a good chance that my meddling will be detrimental, then I'd rather be hands-off here.  However, if it's more likely that informing the other interviewers of my offer will give me a boost, then I'd want to do so.  Thanks for any clarity you can provide!  Edit: For a bit more information and context, the position I've been offered is a non-academic research position that my advisor has described as "prestigious."  The other positions for which I've interviewed (and which I prefer) are mostly academic teaching-centered positions (visiting assistant professors, tenure-track at smaller four year institutions). Is it possible to disable the 'Block Placed' message when using tellraw /setblock? I want to make a tellraw shop but to activate command blocks I want to use /setblock command when clicked on a text. Is it possible to disable "Block placed" text showing up? Why is my voice command missing from the ok glass menu in XE16? Why sometimes evidence is said to be too complex to compute and other times is negelected cause it is fixed?