Noob - Aligning text left and right of image
Vertically align text next to an image?
Given a string of JSON data, how can I safely turn that string into a JavaScript object?  Obviously I can do this unsafely with something like:  var obj = eval("(" + json + ')');   but that leaves me vulnerable to the JSON string containing other code, which it seems very dangerous to simply eval. Well, may be this is not really useful, but I've thought if it was possible to put all the document in one long page. I mean, if your document is going to be read in a computer, mix all the pages in a continuous page. If your document has 90 pages (A4), where each one is 21cm by 29.7cm the continuous document should be (more or less) one page which is 21cm by 90 · 29.7 = 2673cm. Is this possible? EDIT: Some things I would like to achieve:  The \newpage, \chapter{}, \part{}, etc. shouldn't go to a new page, they should only add more vertical space. The package pdfpages should add the pages continuously with almost no space between them. The titlepage, in this case, has a different color, so it could go alone in a basic A4 page (just to make things easier).  Question Is this possible? JavaScript object: access variable property by name as string How do I split a string by a multi-character delimiter in C#? OneDrive for Windows 10 - Remove logged out account Did the verb “fire a weapon” exist before the actual introduction of firearms on battlefields?  More specifically, does it make sense for a creative work to have archers (or whatever ranged weaponry) be told to “fire!”, when the world they live in has not yet seen firearms?  It seems some kind of an anachronism to me, since before firearms, “fire” would never propel any projectile...  I've seen several movies do it; I can't remember them all, but for instance I verified it in The Lord of the Rings trilogy (left), Kingdom of Heaven (top right), and more recently Frozen (bottom right):    The first two do it several times (with Kingdom of Heaven also using it on ballistae, and The Return of the King even having Aragorn ask Legolas to ), whereas firearms never appear on the battlefields they feature (Kingdom of Heaven is set in the 12th century; as for The Lord of the Rings, apart from one occurrence of a witchcraft-ish bomb, it's archery and medieval siege engines all the way).  Frozen may be debatable, happening probably somewhere in the 18th or 19th century, but since we only see swords, spears and the like, it made me flinch to hear crossbowmen use “fire!”.  I've also noticed other movies avoiding this, using “loose!” instead, such as Troy (left) and Gladiator (right):    This makes me think it would be the right thing to say instead... although I'm still wondering why not use “shoot”, which seems simpler to me. How to "shuffle" an array? Making tags visible when using a Tumblr theme that doesn't show them I'm going on a vacation from Europe to the US and was planning of bringing along some Xbox360 or PS3 games, but now I'm curious if they will be compatible with my European Xbox.  In that past there would be a clear difference between NTSC and PAL games, but is this still the case with the current gen of consoles? Are functions of independent variables also independent? Why do we use residuals to test the assumptions on errors in regression? Suppose that we have a model $Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1X_{i1} + \beta_2X_{i2} + \dots + \beta_kX_{ik} + \epsilon_i$.  Regression has a number of assumptions, such as that the errors $\epsilon_i$ should be normally distributed with mean zero and constant variance. I have been taught to check these assumptions using a normal QQ plot to test for normality of the residuals $e_i = Y_i - \hat{Y}_i$ and a residuals vs. fitted plot to check that the residuals vary around zero with constant variance.  However, these tests are all on the residuals, not the errors.  From what I understand, the errors are defined as the deviation of each observation from their 'true' mean value. So, we can write $\epsilon_i = Y_i - \mathbb{E}[Y_i]$. These errors cannot be observed by us. *  My question is this: how good of a job do the residuals do in mimicking the errors?   If the assumptions appear to be satisfied on the residuals, does this mean they are satisfied on the errors too? Are there other (better) ways to test the assumptions, like fitting the model to a testing dataset and getting the residuals from there?    * Furthermore, does this not require that the model is specified correctly? That is, that the response really does have a relationship with the predictors $X_1, X_2,$ etc. in the way specified by the model.  If we are missing some predictors (say, $X_{k+1}\ \text{to}\ X_p$), then the expectation $\mathbb{E}[Y_i] = \beta_0 + \beta_1X_{i1} + \beta_2X_{i2} + \dots + \beta_kX_{ik}$ would not even be the true mean, and further analysis on an incorrect model seems pointless.  How do we check whether the model is a correct one? What is "Go" in cribbage? I've played a fair bit of cribbage, but I've never heard of scoring one point for "Go" (as mentioned in this other question: ).  What is it, and what impact does it have on the game? Forgot which email I used, can't login I forgot what email I used for my other ploxtic id: how do you find out what my email was?   The account is user:2078229. Showing that $\displaystyle\lim_{s \to{1+}}{(s-1)\zeta(s)}=1$ I need prove the following: ($\zeta(s)$ is the Riemann zeta function)  $\displaystyle\lim_{s \to{1+}}{(s-1)\zeta(s)}=1$  I really don't know, I have tried hard, but have obtained nothing for now. Site specific magic comment links This one seems to be a common question in most forums and all over the web, it is asked here in many formats that typically sound like this:  In SQL Server -  What are some reasons the transaction log grows so large? Why is my log file so big? What are some ways to prevent this problem from occurring? What do I do when I get myself on track with the underlying cause and want to put my transaction log file to a healthy size? $x^y+y^x>1$ for all $(x, y)\in \mathbb{R_+^2}$ Prove that $x^y+y^x&gt;1$ for all $(x, y)\in \mathbb{R_+^2}$. I am lost in normalizing, could anyone guide me please.  I have a minimum and maximum values, say -23.89 and 7.54990767, respectively.  If I get a value of 5.6878 how can I scale this value on a scale of 0 to 1. I've been doing some practice questions in the textbook for an upcoming predicate calculus lecture and I think I've managed to get A and B (possibly C) correct but I am clueless on how I can manage D and E.   For A I got: ∃x(R(x)∧¬B)  For B I got: ∀x(¬R(x)∧B)  For C I got: ∃x(R(x)∧(x=y))   - Not sure if this is even remotely correct    R(X) : ”X is rich”  X = Y : ”X equals Y”  B : ”Bill Gates”  a) Someone besides Bill Gates is rich.  b) Bill Gates alone is rich.  c) At least two people are rich.  d) Exactly one person is rich.  e) Exactly two persons are rich.  The universe of discourse is the set of all people. How to turn hundreds of text URLs in Excel into clickable hyperlinks?