Using \equiv causes my font to become italicized and doesn't allow spacing
Some text lines are italicized with no spaces between words
Simple regular expression for a decimal with a precision of 2 Why did Obi-Wan allow Leia to get adopted by such a high profile figure? What is the best way to parse html in C#? How can I get the size of a memory block allocated using malloc()? Unique (non-repeating) random numbers in O(1)? I'd like to generate unique random numbers between 0 and 1000 that never repeat (i.e. 6 doesn't show up twice), but that doesn't resort to something like an O(N) search of previous values to do it. Is this possible? How to scale dimensions proportionally to a specific size? I modeled a man and would like to scale him down to be exactly 6' tall (Z dimension), however I cannot find a way to do that. I know I can go to front ortho view and and use the normal scale S  key to scale it, however that requires some pretty specific fine tuning in order to get it to the right dimensions.  I'd like to be able to essentially type "6" into the Z dimension (don't worry I have it setup in imperial) and have it scale the X and Y dimensions proportionally. Is it possible to enforce unique values in a column, excluding nulls? has been, have been , had been Please anyone tell me when we have to use "has been, have been , had been" and something  started in past and still continuing is it possible to use has been ? Product of Consecutive Integers is Not a Power Set up a scheduled job? Contraction of quotient ideal is quotient of contractions? I want to overlay one image with another using CSS. An example of this is the first image (the background if you like) will be a thumbnail link of a product, with the link opening a lightbox / popup showing a larger version of the image.   On top of this linked image I would like an image of a magnifying glass, to show people that the image can be clicked to enlarge it (apparently this isn't obvious without the magnifying glass). Parse XML with Namespace using SimpleXML TP-LINK TL-WN823N Unable to connect to network Gravitational slingshot of light using a black hole/massive object Wikipedia has this page on  using planets. In some cases this effect was used to accelerate the spacecraft to a higher velocity. This diagram shows this in a very oversimplified manner.   That got me thinking that if light is affected by gravity, and if it slingshots around the black hole/massive object, can't it gain a higher speed than $c$? What limitations are stopping it from doing this?  Forgive me if the answer to this question is pretty straight-forward or staring-you-in-the-face kind. I haven't fully understood the mechanics of the gravitational slingshot fully yet, but I couldn't wait to ask this. Note: If it is possible (I highly doubt that!), could you provide an explanation using Newtonian mechanics, I'm not very familiar with general relativity because I'm in high school. Appearing on the second page (under the section Digression: Size worries) of the following paper about the Yoneda Lemma:     It says that $a$ $priori$ $[\mathcal C^{op},Set](H_A,X))$ is a class. I don't understand why this is the case.  My understanding is that $a$ $priori$ each member of $[\mathcal C^{op},Set](H_A,X))$ is a class.  So it seems to me that $[\mathcal C^{op},Set](H_A,X))$ could be a collection of proper classes.  I've looked at this , but it hasn't helped me much.  Any help is appreciated -Thanks Do spice containers need to be hermetic? Spice containers purchase  I'm planning on upgrading my spice storage. Reading some advice online (e.g. , and ) I came to the conclusion that spice containers should:   Not be exposed to direct sunlight and high temperatures Be airtight   Which means that either you store it inside of some closed cupboard/wardrobe/room or you have containers which do block light and are in a relatively shady place. And the containers need to be airtight.  Available solutions  I've been browsing for some containers available online in my country and the 2 most sensible options I've seen are these:       The problem  The first one is hermetic (it has some rubber around the lid) but it's clear glass. The other one does not have the rubber, just a regular twist-off lid, but it's amber glass.  It'll be hard for me to find any space inside of cupboards to store all of my spices (I need at least 30), so I'd rather buy amber glass container, which I believe will effectively block the sunlight, even when kept on the counter. But I can't find any hermetic amber-glass containers, only ones with regular lid.  The question  Is that regular twist-off lid enough to keep spices airtight and fresh? Or should I focus on buying a hermetic container (like the one in clear glass). I could then for example paint them black to block the sunlight. How to loop the particle simulation indefinitely? Natbib In-Text Citation displays (author?) I have taken a look through many other questions on this subject but cannot seem to fix my issue. Essentially while references display correctly I cannot get the author citation to appear in my text despite running pdflatex followed by bibtex followed by two more runs of pdflatex. Any help would be appreciated.  Sample tex file:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{natbib}  \begin{document}  Blahblahblah \citet*{Test12}.  \bibliographystyle{plain} \bibliography{refs}  \end{document}   refs.bib:  @article{Test12, author = "John Smith", title = "Test Article", year = "2012", journal = "The Test Journal" }   Output: Random Sample vs. As Large a Sample as Possible? I'm struggling to differentiate scenarios where you would use random sampling vs. getting as large a sample as possible. For instance, one thing I am trying to test is the notion that being in a "home" arena boosts player performance.  I have collected individual football game data for every game over the past 10 years. I have over 34000 observations of players performance during this time span. Would it have been more prudent for me to take a random sample of say, 1000 players over the past 10 years?  I just don't understand why, in the above scenario, I'd take a random sample of 1000 when I can just take all of the players performances from the past 10 years.