Where does currently fit in?
Adverb sentence query
So from what I remember it was on cable TV. The main hero was a TV actor zapped to a alien planet. It had a evil overlord with a virgin priestesses. She wants to get laid but he refuses because the next priestesses is only three. Regardless it's a parody things include a man who was maimed by the evil overlord wants revenge the hero eventually screws the virgin priestesses it cuts to scenes of a train going into a tunnel and a volcano erupting. Link2SD not working completely What are suitable TV sizes and viewing distances for couch surfing on a 1080p LCD HDTV? When I visit  I see this:     The "Congratulations! You've earned (badge)" section has dropped down completely beneath the tabs under it. The "You've earned a new privilege!" section has a gap at the bottom:     Shog9 says in comments how to reproduce this:     Gotta have earned a badge, not dismissed the notification, and be looking at your own profile. In Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (the one from 1982, not the recent remake), Khan yells "This is Ceti Alpha V!" and they're all like this is a big surprise, we didn't know.  If they had previously charted the planet, wouldn't the computer have told them the planets weren't quite where they should be based on earlier visits? I mean, we can predict the next hundred transits of Venus, shouldn't 23rd century explorers be able to predict where the Ceti planets are less than twenty years after their first visit? How can I install more recent versions of software than what Debian provides? So, according to Einstein's theory of general relativity, gravity is not a force instead it is a consequence of objects with mass deforming spacetime, right? And so, according to him, there is no difference between standing on a platform accelerating upwards at 9.81 m/s^2 and standing on Earth, right? But, there is a difference. At least, I think it's a valid difference. If you drop two apples from a high altitude on Earth, not only will they accelerate downwards at 9.81m/s^2 but they will also slightly move towards each other because the Earth is a sphere and gravity acts radially inwards pulling the two apples closer to each other. But if you drop the apples from the same height above the accelerating platform, the apples will only appear to accelerate downwards at 9.81 m/s^2 but will not move towards each other like they would on Earth. Why is this true? Is this even a valid difference? If it isn't, why isn't it? Browse for Servers does not display local instance I just installed SQL Server and SQL Server Management Studio but it doesn't show anything in servers list and I don't know how to connect to it.  This shows that I have installed SQL Server:        But in this image you can see that my Browse for Servers dialog is empty:        Network servers is empty too. Which manga chapters correspond to the 2nd season (or "Season 3" on Netflix) of the anime, "Revival of the Commandments"? The 2nd season (labeled as "Season 3" on Netflix) of the anime, Nanatsu no Taizai: Imashime no Fukkatsu (or The Seven Deadly Sins: Revival of The Commandments), has ended.  Which manga chapters correspond to each of the anime episodes? Sugar daddy wants my online banking login info to make deposits — is it a scam? Find the derived subgroup of $A_4$.   Since it is $A_4$, for a permutation $\sigma$ to be in $A_4$, $\sigma$ must have a cycle structure of $2$ cycles. Therefore, $\sigma=(ab)(cd)$.  The commutator of such elements, would be obviously another permutation of $2$-cycle (of length $2$).  Does it mean that $A'_4=A_4$? sqlite database default time value 'now' Prove Lipschitz function $f$ with constant $K$ is integrable on $[0, 1].$ We suppose that $f : [0, 1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is a Lipschitz function with constant $K$. We want to show that $f$ is integrable on $[0, 1].$  I've been trying to use the Darboux criterion of integrability by trying to show that, for $\epsilon &gt; 0$, $$S^*(f,P) - S_*(f, P) &lt; \epsilon,$$ where $S^*(f, P)$ and $S_*(f, P)$ are the Upper and Lower Riemann Sums, respectively.  This is what I have so far: $$\sum_{i=1}^n M_i (x_i - x_{i-1})- \sum_{i=1}^n m_i (x_i - x_{i-1}) = \sum_{i=1}^n (M_i - m_i) (x_i - x_{i-1})$$ $$\le \sum_{i=1}^n K (x_i - x_{i-1}).$$ because $|f(x) - f(u)| \le K|x-u| \le K |1|$, since $x\in [0, 1]$. Then, $$\sum_{i=1}^n K (x_i - x_{i-1}) = K.$$ However, this is only a single upper bound, not an arbitrary $\epsilon.$ Can I get some pointers about how to proceed? Thanks! How do I change my Minecraft username? Strange error defining a macro with arguments for math mode Here's a question that I share:  Show that if $D$ is a countable subset of $\mathbb R^2$ (provided with its usual topology) then $X=\mathbb R^2 \backslash D $ is arcwise connected. ICANN charges 18¢ per domain name registered regardless of its extension, but I pay $10 for a domain name per year with my registrar.   What do domain name registrars do for its customers to justify this extra $9.82?  Is there something that they do for our domain names other than registering it with ICANN?   I just read about the 7 people who hold the ICANN database key and got a little bit curious to know what the domain name servers do for us to justify this extra amount (12 times the actual fee)? Why should I put a ~ before \ref or \cite? My question is in the title of this post, but extends to other referencing commands like \eqref, \citep, \citet (and the like) as well. What is the scope of variables in javascript? Do they have the same scope inside as opposed to outside a function? Or does it even matter? Also, where are the variables stored if they are defined globally? How do you keep parents of floated elements from collapsing?