how to create an image without declaring it in xml file android
ImageView without xml definition
What are the different ways that a message can be displayed to a bash shell after a user logs in? How to avoid the wrinkle at the poles of the UV sphere? When I create a UV sphere and add the subdivision surface modifier, the following wrinkle appears.    How can I avoid it?  I've read the article  but there seems to be no clear solution.  UPDATE 1  I've used the word 'apply' in the first sentence of the initial version of this question. It's misleading since I want to preserve the modifier without 'applying' it. Rather, what I meant is 'adding' the modifier.  UPDATE 2  I followed josh sanfelici's solution, but still there is an artifact at the pole.  Here is the screen: (A rendered view with a sun lamp)    Maybe it's the limitation of the general-purpose subdivision modifier.  BTW, when the cast modifier is added after the subdivision modifier, the sphere becomes perfect (even for my original wrinkled sphere).  But since I want to edit the resulting sphere (for example, scaling X, Y, etc) while modifier is added but not applied, it's not usable. "Nikki's and Alice's X" vs. "Nikki and Alice's X" Could authors overturn recent community review decisions? When new users edit a post, the review is posted to a review queue and other reputable users can review the edit and choose to approve or reject it. However, I feel that a lot of people do it pretty quickly.    to . He was fixing broken links in the answer, and as soon as I saw it I knew it would have been a good edit. However, only one reviewer found so, and three others rejected it. I ended up manually doing the edit, and poor Onato didn't get any credit for it (in fact, he got an undeserved 'rejected' for it).  The point I want to bring is that, first and foremost, the person who wrote the answer probably knows best if an edit is acceptable or not. Could there be a time frame where the author of the answer (or question) can overturn a review decision?    EDIT: one more  was rejected by overeager reviewers as well. I absolutely disagree with the notion that the community knows better. The community repeatedly proves that it only wants Internet points.    EDIT: I told a commenter to fix something himself in one of my posts, but . I went back and applied the changes myself. It's not credited to him and his stats got a rejected edit now (which really should be an approved edit). The reason ("This edit is incorrect or an attempt to reply to or comment on the existing post") is blatantly wrong and shows once more that the community has much less insight into edit quality than the people who wrote the answers in the first place. It's true that the UI didn't make it easy for them, but those guys clearly didn't read the comment thread; I did, because as the author, I was notified.    EDIT: This time around, a user fixed a blatant (though small) mistake in one of my accepted answers. One hour later, another, unrelated 10k user , even though it had been approved by the community. I went back to undo his undo.  This goes on again to show that an active user is the best judge for the quality of an edit, and that since I can have the last word on edits on my own posts, I should be allowed to retroactively overturn a community edit vote and accordingly credit the person who proposed the change.    EDIT I wrote a  years ago. Some guy found it and tried to fix it but the community thought that it wasn't worth it. I think that the changes are great and once more I'll integrate them by myself into my post. Unfortunately for this user, he won't be credited for it. I still don't understand why I can't have a binding vote on edits on my posts. Zsh says "no matches found" when trying to download video with youtube-dl I downloaded youtube-dl using pip on CrunchBang (a Debian Wheezy distro). When I run   youtube-dl {video URL}   I get  zsh: no matches found: {video URL}   I guess it has something to do with zsh, because I found some users on Arch forums complaining about it. When I switched to bash it worked. Is there any way to specify a suggested filename when using data: URI? Gosper's unusual formula connecting $e$ and $\pi$ "How big of a problem" vs. "how big a problem" Quite a few phrases in English are constructed like so:     How [adjective] a [noun]...?   This is the question form of the construction, which is often answered with the negative:     Not that [adjective] a [noun].   or the positive:     Quite [adjective] a [noun].   However, from time to time I'll hear the word 'of' inserted before the 'a', e.g.:     Not that [adjective] of a [noun].   This usually sounds wrong to me, with the exception of the case where the adjective 'much' is used.  So, this sounds fine to my ear:     Not that much of a problem.   whereas this doesn't:     Not that loud of a noise.   Why is it that 'much' should be used with 'of', and other adjectives not?  Is it because 'much' is seen as measuring a quantity (of something), whereas other adjectives that may be used in this construction are seen as measuring the quality of a whole thing? I was trying to suggest a retag of  on Seasoned Advice, but the system won't let me; I get the familiar message     Edits must be at least 6 characters; is there something else to improve in this post?   In general, that's not true for retagging; if you don't change the question body at all, it should work. I suspect the logic checking the edit is thrown off guard because of the title warning:     The question you're asking appears subjective and is likely to be closed       I found , but I cannot find any evidence (in SEDE) for invisible characters being present in the question's source. Also, that's supposed to be . I want to have more than one user logged on at the same time, on the same computer. Each user should have a full X session. It is easy enough to log in to multiple concurrent non-X Linux terminals, but I want the X factor. Maybe I've missed something, but I only see a Main Menu option to Log out of the current user, and nothing for Switch User. Is there a simple way to do this? Let $f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ be a continuous function such that $f(f(f(x)))=x,\forall x \in \mathbb R$ , then is it true that $f(x)=x , \forall x \in \mathbb R$ ? I can see that $f$ is bijective , hence strictly monotone . But I cannot progress further . Please help. Thanks in advance If a Continuous function $f(x)$ satisfies $f(x) = f(2x)$, for all real $x$, then does $f(x)$ necessarily have to be constant function? If so, how do you prove it? If not any counter examples? I am trying to install Wordpress on Lubuntu. I followed the instructions . Including PHP Apache and MySQL setups. Apache and MySQL appear to be running fine.  However, when I go to http://localhost/blog/, I get the following error:     Neither /etc/wordpress/config-localhost.php nor /etc/wordpress/config-localhost.php could be found.   Ensure one of them exists, is readable by the webserver and contains the right password/username. So I found this on the Wolfram website today:     So I was wondering about how one might be able to (if possible) solve those four problems by hand. Here are the problems, $\LaTeX$ed:    $ \lim_{x \to +\infty} \dfrac {\sqrt{x^3-x^2+3x}}{\sqrt{x^3}-\sqrt{x^2}+\sqrt{3x}} $ $ \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \dfrac {(-1)^{k+1} k^2}{k^3+1} $  $ \dfrac {\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}u} \left[ \dfrac {u^{n+1}}{(n+1)^2} \cdot \left[ (n+1) \ln u - 1 \right] \right] $  $ \displaystyle\int_0^{2\pi}\displaystyle\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}}\displaystyle\int_0^4 \left( \rho \cos \phi \right) \rho^2 \sin \phi \, \mathrm{d}\rho \mathrm{d}\phi \mathrm{d}\theta$     Ideas   The degree of the numerator is $\frac{3}{2}$. The degree of the denominator is $\frac{3}{2}$. The expression is of an indeterminate form, namely $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$, so we use l'Hoptial's Rule.  No ideas, really.  Derivatives are always pretty easy, although this one is a bit bashy. Basically bash Product and Chain Rules, etc.  Integration by Parts bash? The $\mathrm{d}\theta$ part is very trivial. I mean for the $\rho$ and $\phi$. I am currently working on a model which takes two parameters and produces a measurement statistic. Think of it as Z = f(X,Y).   Z is a matrix of my statistics and I am creating a surface plot of it in matlab. Basically, I am looking for a mathematical/analytical way of determining if the surface is smooth, or if it is jagged. Do large values tend to be clustered together or are they dispersed throughout the matrix? - that is my question. Basically, how mixed up are the values of my matrix?  I need to run the model over different parameter sets and I want to be able to analytically determine which one of my surfaces is the smoothest, has the greatest clustering of large values, and ideally, has no negative values.   Any help will be greatly appreciated and please let me know if you need any further information.   Cheers The following is exercise 8.2 in 3rd edition (and exercise 8.19 in 2nd edition) of Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.   Adding the total time derivative of a function of $q_i$ and t to the Lagrangian will not change the the Euler-Lagrangian equation. So if we make the following change to Lagrangian,   $$L'(q,\dot{q},t) = L(q,\dot{q},t) + \frac{dF(q_1,q_2,...,q_n,t)}{dt}$$ we can get  $$ \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial{L'}}{\partial{\dot{q_i}}} - \frac{\partial{L'}}{\partial{q_i}} = 0 $$ from  $$ \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot{q_i}}} - \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{q_i}} = 0 $$  How can we get the corresponding Hamiltonian equation part? This is to prove  $$ \dot{p'_i} = \frac{\partial{H'}}{\partial q_i} $$ $$ -\dot{q_i} = \frac{\partial{H'}}{\partial p'_i}  $$  from   $$ \dot{p_i} = \frac{\partial{H}}{\partial q_i} $$ $$ -\dot{q_i} = \frac{\partial{H}}{\partial p_i}  $$ where $p'_i = \frac{\partial L'}{\partial \dot q_i}$.  Edit  The corresponding $H'$ is $$ H' = \sum_k{p'_k \dot{q_k}} - L' $$ where $p'_k = \frac{\partial L'}{\partial \dot q_k}$. The Software Center in Ubuntu 16.04 (Gnome Software) shows only part of the packages available. While e.g. apt list qtcreator correctly lists the corresponding package a search in Software Center finds nothing.  Is there something misconfigured? I upgraded from 15.10. Until now I have used the old Ubuntu Software Center which worked fine. The Start menu no longer shows up when I press the Start button So a buddy and I were playing a game of Magic that turned out to be a really quick game because he got  out on the battlefield early. He was tapping it without attacking because of its obviously awesome ability but I don't know if you can tap a creature for its Inspired (untap-triggered) ability without attacking for it to then be tapped. Are you allowed to tap a creature whenever you want? Can prematurely powering down a computer cause bad sectors in a hard drive?