Why does a cyclist/motorcyclist bend when making a turn?
Does leaning (banking) help cause turning on a bicycle?
Proving $\sup B=\inf A$ Let $A$ be a nonempty and bounded below, and define $B= \{b\in \mathbb{R}: b$ is a lower bound for $A\}$. Show sup$B$ = inf$A$.   So far I have: Let $A$ be nonempty and bounded below. This implies $\exists l \in A, \forall a \in A, l\leq a$ and $l =$ inf$A$. Let $B = \{b\in \mathbb{R}: b$ is a lower bound for $A\}$ and let $M=$ sup$B$. This implies $\exists b\in B, \forall b \in B, b\leq M$. By definition of $B$, we know inf$A \in B$. Since $b\leq$ sup$B$, with sup$B$ the largest element in $B$, we have inf$A \leq M =$ sup$B$, so inf$A \leq$ sup$B$.  I realize I have to prove that sup$B \leq$ inf$A$ to get that sup$B$=inf$A$. I am having trouble doing so.   Part B: Use (a) to explain why there is no need to assert that greatest lower bounds exist as part of the Axiom of Completeness. How to set a command block with a command inside using the setblock command How can I `alias sudo !!`? I'm trying to set an alias for sudo !! in Bash. I tried alias sbb='sudo !!', but it interprets that as a literal  !! and prints   sudo: !!: command not found   If I use double quotes, it substitutes the double bang in the string itself, so that doesn't work.  Is there any way to make this work? Or an alternative alias? ` I have read a lot about the SB-800/SB-900 but I am on a low budget (around ~120$). Is there an external flash that I can have to start learning to use it? I do not need TTL compatibility so it can be an older model. I have a Nikon D5000. Calculate: $$\int_{0}^{2\pi}e^{R{ {\cos t}}}\cos(R\sin t+3t)\mathrm{d}t$$ My try: $\displaystyle\int_{0}^{2\pi}e^{R{ {\cos t}}}\cos(R\sin t+3t)dt\\ \displaystyle \int_{|z|=R}e^{\mathfrak{R\textrm{z}}}\cos(\mathfrak{I\textrm{z}}+3(-i\log z)dz\\ \displaystyle \int_{|z|=R}e^{\mathfrak{R\textrm{z}}}\mathfrak{R\textrm{e}}^{(\mathfrak{I\textrm{z}}+3(-i\log z))i}dz\\ \displaystyle \int_{|z|=R}e^{\mathfrak{R\textrm{z}}}\mathfrak{R\textrm{e}^{\mathfrak{I\textrm{z}}}}z^{3}dz\\ \displaystyle \int_{|z|=R}e^{\mathfrak{R\textrm{z}}}\mathfrak{R\textrm{e}^{\mathfrak{I\textrm{z}}}R}z^{3}dz$ and there is nothing here that is not holomorphic, therefore according to Cauchy theorem it must be exactly $0$. Explain Root Mean Square Error to non-technical audience Why is it considered a bad practice to omit curly braces? Why does everyone tell me writing code like this is a bad practice?  if (foo)     Bar();  //or  for(int i = 0 i &lt; count; i++)     Bar(i);   My biggest argument for omitting the curly braces is that it can sometimes be twice as many lines with them. For example, here is some code to paint a glow effect for a label in C#.  using (Brush br = new SolidBrush(Color.FromArgb(15, GlowColor))) {     for (int x = 0; x &lt;= GlowAmount; x++)     {         for (int y = 0; y &lt;= GlowAmount; y++)         {             g.DrawString(Text, this.Font, br, new Point(IconOffset + x, y));         }      }  }  //versus using (Brush br = new SolidBrush(Color.FromArgb(15, GlowColor)))     for (int x = 0; x &lt;= GlowAmount; x++)         for (int y = 0; y &lt;= GlowAmount; y++)             g.DrawString(Text, this.Font, br, new Point(IconOffset + x, y));   You can also get the added benefit of chaining usings together without having to indent a million times.  using (Graphics g = Graphics.FromImage(bmp)) {     using (Brush brush = new SolidBrush(backgroundColor))     {         using (Pen pen = new Pen(Color.FromArgb(penColor)))         {             //do lots of work         }     }  } //versus using (Graphics g = Graphics.FromImage(bmp)) using (Brush brush = new SolidBrush(backgroundColor)) using (Pen pen = new Pen(Color.FromArgb(penColor))) {     //do lots of work }     The most common argument for curly braces revolves around maintance programming, and the problems that would ensue by inserting code between the original if statement and its intended result:  if (foo)     Bar();     Biz();     Questions:   Is it wrong to want to use the more compact syntax which the language offers? The people that design these languages are smart, I can't imagine they would put a feature which is always bad to use. Should we or Shouldn't we write code so the lowest common denominator can understand and have no problems working with it?  Is there another argument that I'm missing? Including section titles in fancyhf headers What could cause exposure problems after my camera got wet? I had an unfortunate accident where my DSLR camera (and me) briefly ended up in a river. The camera wasn't fully submerged but it did get very wet. It still works, sort of, although the electrics are doing some random things. I'm hoping that's just a bit of dampness doing that, that will fix itself when it dries out fully.  More concerning is that the documents exposure metering seems to be all wrong when using the viewfinder. Pictures are extremely overexposed and nearly white. But if I use live view, then they are fine.  Why could cause this? I assume the light is routed a different way when using the viewfinder and maybe it is going through something with water/condensation on it? How are strings passed in .NET? Is it possible for some integer $n&gt;1$ that $2^n-1\mid 3^n-1$ ?   I have tried many things, but nothing worked. Adjectives or compound noun? I'm preparing a new template for our students' projects based on memoir. All this projects are supervised (directed) by one or more professors so I would like to declare a command like \author but called \director.   This way the student can declare \director{My professor} and the template will place and format the name.   I would like to be like \author and not just a simple \newcommand because it can include affiliation, several names, etc.  I don't know where is \author declared, where should I look? How to use a proxy on the command line? I can set my proxy username and password along with proxy settings in the proxy ui but these settings do not work on the command line. How can I use apps such as wget &amp; ping on the command line with a proxy?  Example Details:   username: 1234 pass: linux proxy: proxy port: 8080 Using Residue Theorem find $\displaystyle \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{1}{a^2\cos^2 t+b^2 \sin^2 t} dt \;; a,b&gt;0$.   My Try:  So, I am going to use the ellipse $\Gamma = \{a\cos t+i b \sin t: 0\leq t\leq 2\pi\}$.   On $\Gamma$, $z=a\cos t+i b \sin t$, so $|z|^2=z\bar{z}=a^2\cos^2 t+b^2 \sin^2 t$.   Now, $dz=-a\sin t+i b \cos t dt$.   Hence, the integral becomes $\displaystyle \int_\Gamma \frac{dz}{z(iab+(\sin t \cos t)(b^2-a^2))}$. I know that $\displaystyle \int_\Gamma \frac{dz}{z}=2\pi i$. Now, how do I get rid of $\sin t \cos t$ part? I am stuck here. Can somebody please explain how? I know that it does consider ' ' as NULL, but that doesn't do much to tell me why this is the case.  As I understand the SQL specifications, ' ' is not the same as NULL -- one is a valid datum, and the other is indicating the absence of that same information.  Feel free to speculate, but please indicate if that's the case.  If there's anyone from Oracle who can comment on it, that'd be fantastic! How do I rotate an object along it's own axis (windmill) I'm trying to rotate the blades of a windmill for an animation but the windmill is already at an angle. When I keyframe it on it's own axis (after pressing control + alt + space) and rotate it the blades spin inwards during the animation before coming back at the end. I've tried locking the other axis but that keeps the blades from rotating back to the right orientation. Also, whenever I rotate the object 360 degrees it turns the 360 into a really small number (0.0001) so it plays forward hallway then backwards (with a 180 degree keyframe halfway). Any help would be appreciated!. At the end of . the author states that  Suppose we have $n \times n$ matrix $A$ having only positive elements and satisfying the property $a_{ij}=1/a_{ji}$ (a matrix satisfying this property is called a reciprocal matrix).  If its largest eigenvalue $\lambda_{max}$ is equal to $n$, then the matrix $A$ satisfies the property (consistency property) $a_{ij} a_{jk} = a_{ik}$ where $i,j,k=1,2,...,n$.  I'm not convinced this theorem is true. Could anyone help? Realtek RTL8723BE Wi-Fi incredibly weak Why does this steam engine fail to run?