Ubuntu download ISO for my computer?
Is the 64-Bit version of Ubuntu only compatible with AMD CPUs?
Hilbert, Gödel, and "God equations" - a 19th century lesson for 21st century physicists? It seems there are a lot of respected physicists appearing on pop-sci programs (discovery channel, science channel, etc.) these days spreading the gospel of   Three examples, quickly: 1) Many programs feature Michio Kaku saying that he is on a quest to find an equation, "perhaps just one inch long," which will "describe the whole universe."  2) Max Tegmark has come out with  in which he expresses the gut feeling that "nothing is off-limits" to science.  The subtitle of this book is My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality.  3) In the series  there is talk about a search for the "God equation."  (A good counter-example would be Feynman, but his self-described "non-axiomatic" or "Babylonian" approach does not seem popular with physicists today.)  Is there any sense among physicists that it might be impossible to articulate the "ultimate nature of reality" in equations and formal logic?  It seems to me that physicists are following in the footsteps of the 19th century mathematicians (led by Hilbert) who were on a similar quest which was put to rest by Gödel's incompleteness theorems in 1931.  Is there any appreciation for how the Incompleteness Theorems might apply to physics?  Has any progress been made on  for the 20th century?  Shouldn't this be addressed before getting all worked up about a "God equation?" I think the term "back and forth" gets thrown around a lot without much thought.  From Dictionary.com:         [fawrth, fohrth]      adverb    1.  onward or outward in place or space; forward: to come forth; go forth.   Wouldn't the term be more meaningful if "forth" was used first since you have to have a starting place before you can go "back"?  Examples:        I've been going back and forth from Houston to New York.   I've been going forth and back from Houston to New York.      Which is more correct? Git command to show which specific files are ignored by .gitignore I am getting my feet wet with Git and have the following issue:  My project source tree:  / | +--src/ +----refs/ +----... | +--vendor/ +----...   I have code (currently MEF) in my vendor branch that I will compile there and then move the references into /src/refs which is where the project picks them up from.  My issue is that I have my .gitignore set to ignore *.dll and *.pdb.  I can do a git add -f bar.dll to force the addition of the ignored file which is ok, the problem is I can not figure out to list what files exist that are ignored.  I want to list the ignored files to make sure that I don't forget to add them.  I have read the man page on git ls-files and can not make it work. It seems to me that git ls-files --exclude-standard -i should do what I want.  What am I missing? The keyboard on my laptop seems to be typing by itself:   It sometimes types characters like 134, whether by itself or when I hit certain keys. Repeating characters may appear unexpectedly. The system volume may change by itself, or windows like the Print dialog or Web browser may appear.   This can happen without any input or as I type, and may occur more often when certain keys are pressed. Sometimes, the keyboard fails to respond altogether. This is happening regardless of the software involved.  Is there a ghost in my keyboard—is my keyboard broken?  A sample of text from the keyboard might look like this (normal QWERTY...ASDF...ZXC... sequence is expected):   QWERTYUIOPASDF)(G@*HKLZXCVBN QWERTYIOPASDFGL!#ZXCVB13 QWERTYUIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVB!#N qwertyu41iopasdf19g13h28j113k4113zxcvb4n qwerty4u1iopasdf0g7h1jklzxcvb13m qwert13uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiopasdf87091134ghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh13jk13zxcvb14      This question comes up often and the answers are usually the same. This post is meant to provide a definitive, canonical answer for this problem. Feel free to edit the answer to add additional details. Why do we use GLM? What can a soldier requisition and for how long? In the military rank feature it says the soldier can "requisition simple equipment or a horse for temporary use". What qualifies as simple equipment, any simple weapon or something less complex than a catapult?  Additionally, which part of the sentence is the "for temporary use referring to, the simple equipment and the horse or just the simple equipment? I'm looking for a class in java that has key-value association, but without using hashes.  Here is what I'm currently doing:   Add values to a Hashtable. Get an iterator for the Hashtable.entrySet(). Iterate through all values and:   Get a Map.Entry for the iterator. Create an object of type Module (a custom class) based on the value. Add the class to a JPanel.  Show the panel.   The problem with this is that I do not have control over the order that I get the values back, so I cannot display the values in the a given order (without hard-coding the order).  I would use an ArrayList or Vector for this, but later in the code I need to grab the Module object for a given Key, which I can't do with an ArrayList or Vector.  Does anyone know of a free/open-source Java class that will do this, or a way to get values out of a Hashtable based on when they were added?  Thanks! on the premise that it "wasn't getting any attention" and now it has gotten a bunch of helpful answers which all help me in some ways making it impossible for me to decide which one to award the bounty to.  Shouldn't there be an option to award the bounty equally among selected answerers, especially in this case where was getting no answers whatsoever before the bounty, or am I overthinking it and should award it to the first answer? Do I need a transit visa for a layover in the United Arab Emirates? Do I need a transit visa for a layover via airports in the UAE, such as Dubai International Airport or Abu Dhabi International Airport? If so, what are the requirements for such a visa? Can I get the transit visa on arrival? I had a problem with disappearing marker as the data sum up to more than 100 while xmax was set to 100. See .  As written in the answer to the cited question I tried to avoid the problem by normalizing the value to 100. But this lead to (much smaller) rounding errors in previously correct rows and now the marker disappear there. See the following example. Before the normalisation the column F ist affected, after the column B.   How can I in a reliable way avoid this rounding problem? Or at least get a clear error message. I have quite a number of this plots and I don't want to have to check them all the time for missing markers.    \documentclass{scrreprt} \usepackage{pgfplots} \pgfplotsset{compat=1.13} \usepackage{pgfplotstable} \pgfplotsset{  my stackbar plot/.style={              xbar stacked,              xmin=0,xmax=100,              symbolic y coords={A,B,C,D,E,F,G},              ytick=data,              nodes near coords={xxx},}}  \begin{document}  \pgfplotstableread[col sep=space]{  text   --  -    +       ++  A      0.0 1.7 13.8    84.5  B      0.0 0.6 20.1    79.3  C      0.0 1.9 13.2    84.9  D      0.0 1.6 27.9    70.5  E      1.3 3.9 19.5    75.3  F      0.0 1.4 15.0    83.7  G      0.3 1.7 24.8    73.2  }\data   \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/expr={\thisrow{--}+\thisrow{-}+\thisrow{+}+\thisrow{++}}]{sum}\data %  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/copy=--]{--o}\data  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/copy=-]{-o}\data  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/copy=+]{+o}\data  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/copy=++]{++o}\data  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/expr={100/\thisrow{sum}*\thisrow{--o}}]{--}\data  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/expr={100/\thisrow{sum}*\thisrow{-o}}]{-}\data  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/expr={100/\thisrow{sum}*\thisrow{+o}}]{+}\data  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/expr={100/\thisrow{sum}*\thisrow{++o}}]{++}\data  \pgfplotstablecreatecol[create col/expr={\thisrow{--}+\thisrow{-}+\thisrow{+}+\thisrow{++}}]{sumnew}\data  \pgfplotstabletypeset[columns={text,sum}   ,precision=10,columns/text/.style={string type}]\data \quad \pgfplotstabletypeset[columns={text,sumnew},precision=10,columns/text/.style={string type}]\data   %\pgfplotstablesave{\data}{pgfplotstempout.dat} \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[my stackbar plot]  \addplot table [x expr = \thisrow{--o},y=text] {\data};  \addplot table [x expr = \thisrow{-o}, y=text] {\data};  \addplot table [x expr = \thisrow{+o}, y=text] {\data};  \addplot table [x expr = \thisrow{++o}, y=text] {\data}; \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture} \quad \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[my stackbar plot]  \addplot table [x expr = \thisrow{--},y=text] {\data};  \addplot table [x expr = \thisrow{-}, y=text] {\data};  \addplot table [x expr = \thisrow{+}, y=text] {\data};  \addplot table [x expr = \thisrow{++}, y=text] {\data}; \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document} The number of labelled graphs with all vertices of even degree I have a graph exam tomorrow, and there is a problem that said number of graph with labeled vertices and all of them of even degree is $ 2^{n-1 \choose 2} $.  According to that topic, it means the number of cut spaces is $ 2^{n-1} $. Well, I don't understand what is cut space yet, and why its count is $ 2^{n-1} $ And don't  know why we should divide the total number of graphs by this! The table cards were A,K,K,8,3. All four suits were on the board. Player one had A,8. Player two had A,3.   Is this a split pot? When should I use "a" vs "an"? In the following example, is it appropriate to use a or an as the indefinite article, and why?     He ate __ green apple.   I know that in the case of just "apple", it would be "an apple," but I've heard conflicting answers for "green apple," where the noun is separated from the article by an adjective.  Also, which is more appropriate in this case:     He ate  __ enormous Pop-Tart. Can I make any injective function bijective by patching the codomain? Is there a robust command line tool for processing csv files? I work with CSV files and sometimes need to quickly check the contents of a row or column from the command line.  In many cases cut, head, tail, and friends will do the job; however, cut cannot easily deal with situations such as  "this, is the first entry", this is the second, 34.5   Here, the first comma is part of the first field, but cut -d, -f1 disagrees. Before I write a solution myself, I was wondering if anyone knew of a good tool that already exists for this job.  It would have to, at the very least, be able to handle the example above and return a column from a CSV formatted file.  Other desirable features include the ability to select columns based on the column names given in the first row, support for other quoting styles and support for tab-separated files.  If you don't know of such a tool but have suggestions regarding implementing such a program in Bash, Perl, or Python, or other common scripting languages, I wouldn't mind such suggestions. Where can I get a Thunderbolt hub or splitter? Apple has just announced the new MacBook Airs, Mac mini, and Thunderbolt display. One of the features of the Thunderbolt display that caught my eye was its ability to daisy-chain two displays together from one Thunderbolt port (on a MacBook Pro).  I already have two 24" monitors and I don't feel like paying for two £900 displays. I worked out that all I need is a Thunderbolt hub/splitter so that I can plug the two cables that emerge into mini DisplayPort-to-DVI adapters.  Does anyone know of any Thunderbolt hubs or splitters? Or does anyone know of an alternative method? How do I bypass "this connection is not private" warnings in safari? A finite summation of double binomial coefficients I find the following identity and have checked on Mathematica, while I have no idea how to prove it:  $$\sum_{j=0}^n(-1)^{n-j}\binom{p+j}{j}\binom{n+\beta}{n-j}=\binom{p-\beta}{n}, \quad \beta&gt;-1, \quad p&gt;\beta-1.$$  It seems that proof by induction does not work and because of the gamma function, the transform technique does not work either. How to execute file I'm editing in Vi(m) For example:     Ever wish you could share information broadly   Could it be rewritten to:     Ever wish you could broadly share information   Are there any rules for the position of the adverbs.