Appending elements and replaceWith() - jQuery
Event binding on dynamically created elements?
Difference between sentences using 'was' and 'being'? What is the meaning of below sentences using was and being?     He committed suicide after he was severely beaten up by four teachers. He committed suicide after being severely beaten up by four teachers. Find longest repeating string based on input in perl (using subroutines) The future of meta.stackoverflow and meta.stackexchange Historically this site, , has been the place to ask questions about not just Stack Overflow, but the functioning of the entire Stack Exchange (2.0) network, including Area 51 and stackexchange.com and careers.  (Yes, there was a , but that dealt with the old legacy Stack Exchange 1.0 sites. It was deprecated a while ago, and currently redirects here.)  Now that we've gotten many, many months under our belt from the SE 1.0 days, I think it's time that we gave Stack Overflow its own, true per-site meta, and moved the higher level network meta discussions to meta.stackexchange.com.  Over time, it's begun to bug me more and more that requests for Stack Overflow, the site, kind of get buried here on meta.stackoverflow under the avalanche of network issues. Retag requests, synonym requests, things truly specific to Stack Overflow, the site, not the network. This is unfair to our vastly largest and flagship Q&amp;A site, and it's unfair to the Stack Overflow users to mix their requests in with network level concerns.  It's also odd that Stack Overflow is the only network site without a proper, dedicated per-site meta, where its meta has its own reputation system not tied to the parent site in any way.  This is mostly a quirk of history more than anything else, and I believe it is now an appropriate time to split into two sites:   , a proper per-site meta for Stack Overflow with integrated rep , a global network meta with its own reputation system   Yes, this will be painful. But I believe it is a good, necessary, and healthy step both for the future of the network and the future of Stack Overflow.  Some things to discuss:   which questions should be migrated from here to meta.so? Obviously site-specific things like the retag-requests, and perhaps questions with the  tag. Anything that is 100% wholly specific to Stack Overflow and not generalizable to the rest of the network should be moved over. This may be a pretty small, narrow list of questions, and that's OK. Should we do some meta spring cleaning in our transition? Which questions / tags should be blown away as no longer relevant, referring to ancient versions of Stack Overflow or issues that have long since ceased to exist and aren't instructive for any future visitors? Your meta reps will generally be unaffected, except insofar as we delete for spring cleaning, or move site-specific things to meta.so. We still plan to have a distinct reputation system for the new meta.se site, just like here.   I do not have a timeline for this change, that is up to Jarrod and David to decide. It may be months away. However, we feel pretty strongly that this is something that we need to do to clean things up and pave the way for the future -- so I expect it will happen in the next few months, giving us lots of time to decide how we want to do it, per the above.  Update  . How do I install Python 3.6 using apt-get? Chapter 5: Are there multiple Endings? I just finished Episode 5 and wondered, if there were alternative endings or game branches. I brought the whole group with me, and am wondering what would have changed if different people accompined me, and if the episode is possible to play out differenly.      On my playthrough, Lee killed the stranger, and on the run back to Christa and Omid, was to weak to continue. Clementine shot him. Kenny died along with Ben after he fell off the building. And Lee was cut off Christa and Omid after they went over the "bridge" first. Java: Prefix/postfix of increment/decrement operators? Replace non-numeric with empty string Lost space after removing bootcamp So I removed bootcamp and now there is a partition called "free space" that I can't remove.  Here is my output from diskutil list:    Here is the screenshot from disk utility showing the partitions:    And here is the error I get when I try to remove "free space":    Heres the output when I run   sudo diskutil apfs resizeContainer disk0s2 0 Why can mathematical equations describe this world? Since I want to understand the world, I learn physics from textbooks. But I feel there is a gap between the textbook and the world. I do not know     why the equations in the textbook can control the whole world? How can I bridge the gap? In research, how can one distinguish whether what we do is meaningful in reality or not?   Any help or suggestions or comments will be appreciated. Modify all bash commands through a program before executing them I am trying to create a program which require such feature. The flow will be like:   User enter a bash command User hit the enter My script will get command, current directory,.. as variables. Program can optionally modify the command. Modified command will get executed normally.   Is there any way to do this?  Note: I need this for my personal use, I am not going to distribute this program. In Euclidean geometry texts, it is always mentioned that point is undefined, it can only be described. Consider the following definition: "A point is a mathematical object with no shape and size." I do not understand what is the problem with this definition. Please give the detailed reasons. Thanks in advance! Is it safe to use the command apt-get autoremove in this particular scenario? How to use resistors? I have a power supply of 5 volts @ 1A. I want to reduce the current from 1A to 250mA. Which resistor should be use?   I tried this equation(Ohm's Law):  R = V / I  = 5/(0.75)  = 6.66 Ohms.  I tried the 6.66 Ohm resistor but it only reduce few mili Amps. Edited photos have reverted to originals on iphone queries with db_select don't respect integers Does a four-divergence extra term in a Lagrangian density matter to the field equations? Greiner in his book "Field Quantization" page 173, eq.(7.11) did this calculation:     ${\mathcal L}^\prime=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\nu A^\mu-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A^\mu\partial_\nu A^\nu $   $\space\space\space\space=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu[A_\nu(\partial^\nu A^\mu)-(\partial_\nu A^\nu) A^\mu]$        The last term is a four-divergence which has no influence on the field equations. Thus the dynamics of the electromagnetic field (in the Lorentz gauge) can be described by the simple Lagrangian        ${\mathcal L}^{\prime\prime}=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu$     Yes, if it is a four-divergence of a vector whose 0-component doesn't contain time derivatives of the field, indeed according to the variational principle this four-divergence will not influence the field equation.  And actually I calculated the time-derivative dependence of 0-component of $[A_\nu(\partial^\nu A^\mu)-(\partial_\nu A^\nu) A^\mu]$, in which only $[A_0(\partial^0 A^0)-(\partial_0 A^0) A^0]$ could possibly contain time-derivative, which vanishes fortunately, so whatever the general case it doesn't matter in this present case.  But how can he seem to claim that it holds for a general four-divergence term,The last term is a four-divergence which has no influence on the field equations?  EDIT: I only assumed the boundary condition to be $A^\mu=0$ at spatial infinity, not at time infinity. And the variation of the action $S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}L \, dt$ is due to the variation of fields which vanish at time, $\delta A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_1)=\delta A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_2)=0$, not having the knowledge of $\delta \dot A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_1)$ and $\delta \dot A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_2)$, which don't vanish generally, so the four-divergence term will in general contribute to the action, $$\delta S_j=\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\int d^3\mathbf x \partial_\mu j(A(x),\nabla A(x),\dot A(x))^\mu =\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\int d^3\mathbf x \dot j^0 =\int d^3\mathbf x [\delta j(\mathbf x, t_2)^0-\delta j(\mathbf x, t_1)^0]$$ which does not vanish in general! Why aren't search engines indexing my content? This is a general, community wiki  question and answer pair intended to address any questions   concerning the reasons a site or specific site contents do not appear   in search engine results.      If your question was closed as a duplicate of this question and you   feel that the information provided here does not provide a sufficient   answer, please open a discussion on .   My site (or specific pages on my site) is not appearing in search engine results.  Why isn't my content indexed and what can I do about it? Why am I not burned by a strong wind? How do I boot into recovery mode? Do Triggered effects stack?