How can I make a grid of plots with no spacing, and have the plots line up perfectly?
Do I have to code each case of this Grid full of plots separately?
Root partition size remains same after partition resize with gparted I had resized my root partition from 30gb to 70gb using gparted. But Ubuntu still shows that I have the same old disk size while gparted shows that I acually have 70gb and that the other 40gb is somehow used. How can I fix this?  Output of 'df -h':  Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda5        30G   16G   13G  55% / none            4.0K     0  4.0K   0% /sys/fs/cgroup udev            1.9G  8.0K  1.9G   1% /dev tmpfs           391M  884K  390M   1% /run none            5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock none            2.0G  284K  2.0G   1% /run/shm none            100M   48K  100M   1% /run/user /dev/sda6       341G  115G  227G  34% /media/Data /dev/sdb1       932G  459G  474G  50% /media/sidharth/passport   Output of mount:  /dev/sda5 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (rw) none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) none on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880) none on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) none on /run/user type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=104857600,mode=0755) /dev/sda6 on /media/Data type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,default_permissions,blksize=4096) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) gvfsd-fuse on /run/user/sidharth/gvfs type fuse.gvfsd-fuse (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=sidharth) /dev/sdb1 on /media/sidharth/passport type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,blksize=4096) Possible Duplicate:          I have been downvoted for few answers of mine and the person who downvoted me did not leave any comments or reasons to say why I was downvoted. In such cases, how can I find out who has downvoted me and the reason for downvoting? "...programs that each perform..." vs "...programs that each performs...": which is correct? When writing a book and referring to a female and male aged 18–25, what term would be most appropriate? Boy and girl seem too young, whereas man and woman seem too old.  Example sentence:     A boy/man emerged from the shadows.   Edit: I think the word I am looking for is similar to 'guy' but less American and colloquial. Any thoughts? Anime about a boy and a girl who ride ostrich-like creatures through a valley I can not remember much but I have had this film in my head for years I searched everything I can remember on every website I can think of.  I don't remember the exact story but I'll list everything about it can   Apocalyptic future possibly Two main characters: a boy and a girl riding ostrich-like creatures through a valley An old blind lady that senses things Crashed spaceship looking like a submarine Giant creatures looks like yaks with blue eyes, whose eyes turn red when something is about to happen The old lady says "Some say they went to the stars" while looking at the spaceship The two main characters do something and their eyes turn blue in the distance and the village cheers   This film is at least ten years old and I would appreciate it so much if you knew anything about it, or could help me find the title. I am logging in to my Ubuntu Server using my username. Once I am logged in I am typing passwd command. Entering a new password but a second after getting following error messages:  passwd: Authentication token manipulation error passwd: password unchanged   What is wrong here? How can I change my password otherwise if I don't have access to that server physically, i.e. I am connecting remotely with ssh using terminal. Elements of $\mathbb{F}_p$ having cube roots in $\mathbb{F}_p$ Let $p$ be a prime number, and let $\mathbb{F}_p$ be the field with $p$ elements. How many elements of $\mathbb{F}_p$ have cube roots in $\mathbb{F}_p$?   I had this question on an exam and after reviewing I am still not sure. Any help would be appreciated. After Doomsday was defeated, a spec-ops team sent to the Kryptionian ship in Metropolis found Luthor submerged in water, in front of a... thing, which "held" three metal cubes. The thing looked up, roars, and dissipates into thin air.    What the hell was that all about? I am really confused. What was that creature and what was Luthor doing with it? Why is this clause unsatisfiable? Is it possible to run commands from spotlight? I run commands in terminal a lot and i'm wondering if it is possible to run the commands from spotlight. For example in spotlight  would like to run the command(because i have a lot of network issues):   ping google.com   And then spotlight to load terminal and execute the command instead of having to load terminal because it takes so long to load. So is this possible? "put X down to" vs. "put down X to": subjects of verbs with two particles I expect I would have to put down many coats to do the job. ()   One factor to distinguish phrasal verbs from prepositional verbs is particle movement. Phrasal verbs can place the particle before or after direct object, whereas the preposition in prepositional verbs must precede the noun. (Biber et al. 1999)    So, I'm confused when analyzing the fragment "put down many coats to" because I'm not able to distinguish whether "put ... " is a phrasal verb or a prepositional verb. The confusion arises when I read in the Oxford Dictionary of English, under 'put' &rarr; 'phrasal verb', the form "put something down to" is correct.  So, the above sentence would be rewritten as follows :     I expect I would have to put many coats down to do the job.   Am I right? If not, how do I correctly distinguish phrasal verbs from prepositional verbs in the cases, like this one, where there are two particles (in this case 'down' and 'to')? Display header and footer in all PDF pages using VF My vf page     &lt;apex:page renderAs="pdf" Controller="testpdf1"&gt;     &lt;head&gt;         &lt;style type="text/css" media="print"&gt;             @page              {                 size: 8.5in 11in;/* width height */             }              @page              {                 @top-center                  {                     content: element(header);                 }                  @bottom-left                  {                     content: element(footer);                 }             }              div.header              {                 padding: 10px;                 position: running(header);             }              div.footer              {                 display: block;                 padding: 5px;                 position: running(footer);             }              .pagenumber:before              {                 content: counter(page);             }              .pagecount:before              {                 content: counter(pages);             }         &lt;/style&gt;     &lt;/head&gt;      &lt;div class="header"&gt;             &lt;div align="right"&gt;Header&lt;/div&gt;     &lt;/div&gt;      &lt;div class="footer"&gt;         &lt;div&gt;Page &lt;span class="pagenumber"/&gt; of &lt;span class="pagecount"/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;     &lt;/div&gt;      &lt;div class="content"&gt;         &lt;p&gt;             &lt;apex:repeat value="{!opp}" var="item"&gt;                 &lt;tr&gt;                     &lt;td class="tableContent"&gt;{!item.Name}&lt;/td&gt;                 &lt;/tr&gt;             &lt;/apex:repeat&gt;         &lt;/p&gt;     &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/apex:page&gt;   Controller  public class testpdf1 {     public list&lt;Account&gt; opp{get;set;}      public testpdf1()     {         opp=[SELECT Name  from Account limit 50];     } }   I am getting all records in pdf format but able to get header in first page only and i am not getting header from second pages how can i display header to all pages. The number of different ways to choose $k$ out of $n$ unique items:   Without repetition and without order-significance: $\binom{n}{k}=\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$ Without repetition and with order-significance: $\binom{n}{k}\times k!=\frac{n!}{(n-k)!}$ With repetition and with order-significance: $n^k$ With repetition and without order-significance: $?$   Thank you! $(a,b) \mathbin\# (c,d)=(a+c,b+d)$ and $(a,b) \mathbin\&(c,d)=(ac-bd(r^2+s^2), ad+bc+2rbd)$. Multiplicative inverse? Let $r\in \mathbb{R}$ and let $0\neq s \in \mathbb{R}$. Define operations $\#$ and $\&amp;$ on $\mathbb{R}$ x $\mathbb{R}$ by $(a,b) \mathbin\#(c,d)=(a+c,b+d)$ and $(a,b) \mathbin\&amp;(c,d)=(ac-bd(r^2+s^2), ad+bc+2rbd)$ as addition and multiplication, respectively. Do these operations form a field?  I have shown that every axiom of the field is satisfied except for the "existence of multiplicative inverses" axiom. This is where I need help. We either need to show that this axiom fails and so we don't have a field or that the axiom $aa^{-1}=1$ is satisfied for every $a\neq 0 \in \mathbb{R}$  The multiplicative identity in this problem is $(1,0)$.  Any solutions or hints are greatly appreciated. How would you represent "religion" in an icon, neutrally? How to install Ubuntu on portable external Hard Drive? OS: Windows 7. I want install Linux Ubuntu on portable external Hard Drive USB 2.0. I read a variety of methods, but I'm confused by contradictory advices and methods. Actually, installing Ubuntu on anything other than clean PC looks much more complicated than installing Windows. I need to have Ubuntu package + Python 2.7 + C compiler installed. My external hard drive is partially filled, I need to keep all files.   Will Ubuntu run entirely on external hardrive, without writing anythinhg to Windows system folders and to registry?  Can anyone post detailed guide how install Ubuntu on external hard drive? stab(S) is isomorphic to $ S_k \times S_{n-k} $ Show that the group $S_n$ (right) acts on the set of subsets of $\{1,2,\ldots n\}$ by $\rho(S,\sigma)=S\sigma$. Show that there are $n+1$ orbits, one for each possible value of $|S|$. Show that if $|S|=k$ then $\mathrm{Stab}(S)\cong S_k\times S_{n-k}$.  I have shown that there are n+1 orbits but now I am stuck with the last bit. my initial thought is that if I let $S =\{1,2,3,...,k\}$ then $\mathrm{Stab}(S)$ would involve $(1)(2)(3)...(k)$ i.e. mapping to itself and then $k+1$ to $n$ mapped in any ways ($S_{n-k}$) I feel like $\mathrm{Stab}$ is isomorphic to $S_{n-k}$ what am I misunderstanding here? How would I prove the last part? Thanks a lot How to use THAT and WHO Meta duplicates don't require an answer. Don't suggest there is one when that's not true This request was sparked . The vote to close as a duplicate on meta, in contrast to the main site, does not require for the duplicate to have an answer. Yet, the closure message still says:     This question has been asked before and already has an answer.    ...even when this is not the case. Perhaps we should either only show this particular sentence if there is indeed an answer, or remove this altogether for meta.   Note: I fear this might be a duplicate request, but I was unable to find one. (Not even one without an answer :) ) Does the stock market create any sort of value? Sorry if the below seems like a conspiracy theory. It probably is, but I probably don't understand something. (This has bugged me to no end as long as I can remember.)  Okay, so here is what I understand about the stock market?   The main way money enters the stock market is through investors investing and taking money out. The only other cash flow is in through dividends and out when businesses go public.   In a Ponzi scheme, there is usually some small source of income to hide the fact that it's a Ponzi scheme. Dividends are pretty insignificant. For the purposes of this question, we will only consider non-dividend stocks.  When you buy stock, it is claimed that you own a small portion of the company. This statement has no backing, as you cannot exchange your stock for the company's assets.   For example, if I bought $10 of Apple Stock early on, but it later went up to $399, I can't go to Apple and say "I own $399 of you, here you go it back, give me an iPhone." The only way to redeem this is to sell the stock to another investor (like a Ponzi Scheme.)  The stock market goes up only when more people invest in it. Although the stock market keeps tabs on Businesses, the profits of Businesses do not actually flow into the Stock Market.   In particular, if no one puts money in the stock market, it doesn't matter how good the businesses do.    Based on the above, it seems like the Stock Market has little to do with investing businesses to create growth, and primarily grows in a similar way to a Ponzi Scheme. (Some differences include that it is Stochastic (so when it collapses, it can be blamed on luck or the economy) and it has no top operator (similar to a Pyramid Scheme)).  Am I missing something? Does the stock market create value for investors?