I got a B- in Math. How bad is that for Econ?
How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?
Using a non-centralized structure for tex files - similar to \graphicspath do { ... } while (0) — what is it good for? Possible Duplicate:          I've been seeing that expression for over 10 years now. I've been trying to think what it's good for. Since I see it mostly in #defines, I assume it's good for inner scope variable declaration and for using breaks (instead of gotos.)  Is it good for anything else? Do you use it? Can I write the output the of time difference command to a file? Site hosted on EC2 / Amazon held hostage with private key I have a new client whose previous developer has left her high &amp; dry with her site on Amazon/EC2. He holds the private key to the instance, and though she has full access to the Amazon control panel (she's paying $300/mo for a site that has like 3 visitors per week) she doesn't have any way to get her content off and move to a new host.  I'm not familiar with AWS and am not sure how to help her. The site's group/file permissions are screwed up on the server so exporting the content/database via her WordPress control panel isn't working.  Any ideas on how to help her? Thanks! How to download image using requests Windows 10 upgrade led to grub rescue Let $X \sim Bin(n,p)$ show that $X/n \nsim Bin()$ Let $X \sim Bin(n,p)$   Part A.  Show that the argument      "Then $X/n \sim Bin()$ with $E[X/n]=p$and $Var[X/n]=pq/n$"    is false.   My book says we can prove this result using a moment generating function. But to me it makes no intuitive sense: We have Bin-distributed RV $X$ and if we rescale it with $1/n$ of course it will be Bin-distributed.  And we know from standard formulas that $E[aX]=aE[X]$ and $Var[aX] = a^2Var[X]$ so I think the argument is correct.   (For full disclosure, the argument we should falsify according to the book is "Let X be a binomial random variable with mean np and variance np(1−p). Show that the ratio X/n also has a binomial distribution with mean p and variance p(1−p)/n." But I think the argument is correct. )    Ok, now I get part A. Here is Part B. Prove it using the moment generating function of $X/n$.   Attempt: I get $$m_X(t)=E[\exp(tX/n)]=(m_X(t))^{1/n}$$ new finding by Minev et al. seems to suggest that transitions between atomic states are not instantaneous, but continuous processes wherein a superposition smoothly adjusts from favoring one state to another (if I understand it correctly). The authors also claim to be able to catch a system "mid-jump" and reverse it. Popular articles are  and .  I am curious if this finding rules out any interpretations of QM. It seems to generally go against the Copenhagen attitude, which describes measurements as collapsing physical systems into a definite classical state. The popular articles indeed claim that the founders of QM would have been surprised by the new finding.  The link with the asterisk mentions that something called "quantum trajectories theory" predicts what was observed. Is this an interpretation, or a theory? And are they implying that other interpretations/theories don't work? How to set the fully qualified hostname on CentOS 7.0? How do I set the fully qualified hostname on CentOS 7.0?  I have seen a few posts online for example using:  $ sudo hostnamectl set-hostname nodename.domainname   However, running domainname returns nothing:  $ domainname (none)   Also:  $ hostname nodename.domainname   However,  $ hostname -f hostname: Name or service not known $ hostname -d hostname: Name or service not known   Some debug output:  $ cat /etc/hostname nodename.domainname  $ grep ^hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf hosts:      files dns Who invented "dooblidoo"? The word  is used by several different youtube channels as a different word for the youtube description bar. I've seen it used by the  and by .  Who was first to use and invent the term? Undergraduate research field different from PhD field I am a Physics undergrad who is interested in pursuing a PhD in pure maths in the future (algebraic geometry/topology) but I am a bit unsure. My question is quite general, and I don't wish to provide more background for fear of bias in the answers.  My question: Is it is advisable/possible/unfavorable/favorable to apply for a PhD in a field, different from that in which you have done most of your undergraduate research?  My research (includes just reading and understanding papers, writing summaries until now, I havent published anything) mostly includes Quantum field theory, and gauge theory. Would the selection committee turn down an application to a pure maths field, if I have no research experience whatsoever?  I would also like to ask the question other way round. What if I concentrate my undergraduate research SOLELY on topics in pure maths such as algebraic geometry/topology and take other physics courses, would I be able to apply to a string theory PhD with a high chance of success?  Should I consider spending time on both of these (which is almost an impossible task), to improve my chances in both the areas or would research in one area, and grad level courses in the other suffice?  In brief: Should the PhD field you are applying to be the same as your undergraduate research area? I want to be able to lock my translation/scale operations to two axes at a time, say xy, xz or yz. It currently takes two operations (one for each axis).  Example, say for a cylinder, I would like to reduce the radius. I currently have to scale on the x axis first, then on the y axis, or I have to manually input the scale values in the object properties panel.  This option is easily accessible in 3dsmax via the axis constraints command bar. Or I can click the intersecting area between the 3d manipulator of the axes in question and move in that plane. Pre-image of a measurable set A is always measurable? Let $f$ be a continuous function on a set $E$.  Is it always true that $f^{-1}(A)$ is always measurable if $A$ is measurable?  I say no.  We know that $\bar{\psi(x)}:=\frac{\phi(x)+x}{2}$ where $\phi$ is the Cantor (or Cantor-Lebesgue) function and $\bar{\psi}:[0,1] \rightarrow [0,1]$.  We know this function maps a measurable subset of $C$ (the Cantor set) into a non-measurable set $W$.  A few observations about $\bar{\psi(x)}$.  It is strictly increasing and continuous, so it has a continuous inverse $\bar{\psi(x)}^{-1}$.  Thus $\bar{\psi(x)}^{-1}(W)=c \subset C$; that is, $\bar{\psi(x)}^{-1}(W)$ is non-measurable, but c is.  Is this correct? How to determine if a string is a valid variable name? Image of concave mirror when object is farther than the focal point I have a set of concave/convex mirrors/lenses, and I have drawn out all of the ray tracing diagrams for each possible combination and type of image each optical element can produce. When I look at the ray tracing diagrams then reproduce the situation in the real world with myself as the &quot;object&quot;, all the scenarios make sense to me except one: when I as the object stand beyond the focal point of a concave mirror.  The image ends up as &quot;real&quot; and appears to be in front of the mirror. Now I understand that in the situation above, I as the object would stand at 6m and this would result in the image appearing at 12m. So if I placed a wall or screen at the 12m mark, the image would form on that surface (just like a movie theater screen).... at least I think I interpreted that correctly. But I still see myself when I look in the mirror?! If the image is supposed to form and come into focus behind me, what in the world am I seeing when looking at the surface of the mirror? I still see myself, just inverted. The surface of the concave mirror still has a reflection on it. It doesn't look quite like a normal flat mirror, in that the image doesn't really look like it's &quot;inside&quot; the mirror, more like it's right on the surface of it. It's really frustrating because every other possible arrangement of optical elements makes total sense to me, except this one. Any suggestions on how to think about it? Thank you for your time! No Badge Progress color for Golden Badges? Two Bibliographies: one for main text and one for appendix I have a manuscript in which has the following structure:  Main Text Bibliography Appendix   However, there are citations which are only cited in the appendix, and they show up in the main bibliography. I would like to split my Bibliography into two different sections, so that the structure of the paper would look like this:  Main Text Bibliography for Main Text Appendix Bibliography for Appendix   I'm currently using bibtex and a single .bib file, and creating the bibliography with  \bibliographystyle {someBibStyleFile} \bibliography {bibFileName}   I'm interested in a method to split my single bibliography into main bibliography and appendix bibliography with minimal changes to the rest of the document.  I'm aware that biblatex is more powerful than bibtex, but I'm not prepared to make the switch before the deadline of this project. There are many related bibliography-with-multiple-sections type of questions, but I didn't see one that covers this case. Counting buffer overlap in QGIS For my thesis I'm modeling the identification of recreation areas.  Therefore, there has been a survey where people were asked to specify where they recreate. They had to indicate this place on a map and give a radius. Now I have to analyse which areas were most visited, and afterwards use the data to give a weighted rating with the travel distance.  So, I use QGIS to Buffer the data points by using the given radius. Now, I want to calculate for every point in the country how many times it was visited.  Any thoughts how to do this in QGIS? So to help prevent brute force attacks against my phpmyadmin install I've configured nginx to require HTTP Basic Auth (extra username and password) and then the requests need to come from a whitelisted IP Address. However the IP Address whitelist works fine if I run  however without adding the extra .php block I could load  without my IP being whitelisted. This issue doesn't affect the HTTP Basic Auth. Is there a reason this happens? Anyway to get around having to add extra .php blocks? A copy of the config area for phpmyadmin is below.  # Setup and secure phpMyAdmin location /phpmyadmin/ {   allow 1.2.3.4;   deny all;   auth_basic "phpMyAdmin - HTTP Basic Login";       auth_basic_user_file /etc/nginx/pma_pass;     location ~ \.php$ {     include snippets/fastcgi-php.conf;             fastcgi_pass unix:/run/php/php7.0-fpm.sock;     allow 1.2.3.4;     deny all;     } } I try to unzip a zip file, but got an error:  $ unzip COCR2_100.zip  Archive:  COCR2_100.zip   End-of-central-directory signature not found.  Either this file is not   a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive.  In the   latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on   the last disk(s) of this archive. note:  COCR2_100.zip may be a plain executable, not an archive unzip:  cannot find zipfile directory in one of COCR2_100.zip or         COCR2_100.zip.zip, and cannot find COCR2_100.zip.ZIP, period.   I googled but didn't find a solution. I was wondering why it is and how I should fix it? Thanks!  The zip file can be downloaded from . It is an application, and here is its website .  My OS is 10.10.