Unable to assign style to dynamically created columns in table
Event binding on dynamically created elements?
This might be a stupid question, but why exactly is work a path function?  In school, my teacher said it’s because it depends on the path. She gave an example of walking up a mountain, and said the work you expend depends on the path you take (straight path up or circling up around the mountain). But isn’t the work expended just equal to $E= mgh?$ Armature keeps spinning around root bone in pose mode when I try to move anything I was following a tutorial on rigging (was pretty much done) and now my entire model keeps spinning around the main root bone if I try to move any bone at all. (first picture is where it originally was and still is while in Rest Position, second image is of how it changes when in Pose Position while in Pose Mode or Object mode, Edit Mode seems fine)    I tried clearing All Transforms or hitting the ALT+g, s, r while all were selected and that just caused it to spin in the same direction like everything else does as shown in this picture:   I was nearly finished with this video tutorial here,     and near the last part my issue began. 2:28:07 was the last time I was in edit mode and the pose was fine. Right after the little turrets he then went and parented 3 more bones and then he switches back to pose mode with no problem, I suspect somewhere in there is where the problem occurred on my end. I could have sworn I followed it correctly but maybe I went wrong somewhere I have no idea.   I couldn't find another issue like mine exactly so sorry if this question has been asked before, I'm still very new.  Edit: I checked in the video comments to see if it had happened to anyone else but I did not see any mention of it unfortunately.  Edit2: Picture for more detail on the yellow lines. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{algorithm}  \begin{document} \setcounter{section}{54} \section{A section with no label} \begin{algorithm} \label{myalg} \caption{An algorithm with the label `myalg'.} \end{algorithm} Reference to myalg: \ref{myalg}. \end{document}   With this code, the reference givens 55 (the section number); if I move the label after the caption command, I get the correct reference (1).  Why should this be the case? I find it confusing: when thinking about an algorithm as an environment, you expect to be able to label it right after you began it. At the very least I would expect some kind of error or "??" to appear, rather than the previous environment or reference-able entity being used. How does one create a custom application launcher for Wine installed apps? Magnitude of standardized coefficients (beta) in multiple linear regression Being aware of , I am curious about the question how big standardized coefficients can get. I had a discussion with my professor about that issue and she was arguing standardized coefficients (beta) in multiple linear regressions can not become greater than |1|. I have also heard that predictors with standardized coefficients greater than 1 should not be be included/appear in multiple linear regression. When I recently estimated a multiple linear regression in R using lm(), I estimated the standardized coefficients with lm.beta() function from the package 'lm.beta'. In the results I could observe a standardized coefficient greater than one. Right now I am just not sure about what is the truth.  Can standardized coefficients become greater than |1|? If yes, what does that mean and should they be excluded from the model? If yes, why?  I would be very thankful, if somebody could make this issue clear for me. I am using &lt;a&gt; tags for links on a web page. How do I disable the Tab key from selecting either of them? Does tourist visa (90 days) apply after a long-term visa ends in Schengen countries? Background I updated my TeX Live installation on my Mac a while ago and got the error LaTeX3 Error: Mismatched LaTeX support files detected. I found a solution at .  As far as I understand it (which isn't very far), there are system formats and local formats, and TeX Live is updating the wrong one.  The fix is to update the formats. Using fmtutil-user --all worked for me.  It spewed out a load of stuff, then output fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /Users/&lt;user&gt;/Library/texlive/2020/texmf-var/web2c/luatex/dvilualatex.log fmtutil [INFO]: /Users/&lt;user&gt;/Library/texlive/2020/texmf-var/web2c/luatex/dvilualatex.fmt installed.  I don't know what this tells me, but my TeX Live preferences has TeX programs set at /Library/TeX/texbin, which seems to be a link to /usr/local/texlive/2020/bin. Problem Every time I update TeX Live, I have to apply the solution again. Question Is there a way to make TeX Live use the correct formats permanently so that I don't have to keep running fmtutil-user --all after every TeX Live update?  Extra information  to  check if you have some local formats around which hide the system formats. (with eg kpsewhich --all --engine=pdftex pdflatex.fmt)  When I did that, it output /Users/&lt;user&gt;/Library/texlive/2020/texmf-var/web2c/pdftex/pdflatex.fmt /usr/local/texlive/2020/texmf-var/web2c/pdftex/pdflatex.fmt  but I don't know what that's telling me. Is errno thread-safe? Property of Entire Functions Suppose $f$ and $g$ are entire functions with $|f(z)|\leq|g(z)|$ for all $z$.  How can we show that $f=cg$ for some complex constant $c$?  Thanks for any help :) C# Lambda expressions: Why should I use them? In Oracle, I can re-create a view with a single statement, as shown here:  CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW MY_VIEW AS SELECT SOME_FIELD FROM SOME_TABLE WHERE SOME_CONDITIONS   As the syntax implies, this will drop the old view and re-create it with whatever definition I've given.  Is there an equivalent in MSSQL (SQL Server 2005 or later) that will do the same thing? How to properly typeset multiletter quantities, e.g. Re or Nu (Reynolds, Nusselt numbers) Is there a canonical way to typeset such quantities in equations and inline math?  \documentclass{article} \begin{document} $Re$, $Nu$ are clearly not an option. $\mathit{Re}$, $\mathit{Nu}$ appear ok to me. \end{document} What do Family Tree Maker users do, now that FTM has been discontinued? I was considering purchasing Family Tree Maker only to find it has been discontinued.    What do they plan for a replacement ? I found native people prefer to use passive voice in a sentence. For example:  Tonight's moon can be seen from anywhere worldwide. We have reason to believe that progress can be made.  Be honest, it's difficult for an English learner to understand. Why not phrase it this way:  We can see the moon from anywhere worldwide.  In which cases do people prefer to use passive voice rather than active voice? One-byte-off pointer still valid in C? polar decomposition of a square A when A is not full rank/invertible Non-normality in residuals My machine is currently running Windows 7. I have 2 partitions: OS (C:) and DATA (D:). I intend to do a native Ubuntu 14.04 install. Assuming I format my Windows OS partition, will I have full access to my D partition in Ubuntu ? Given that the sequence $(v,Av,A^2v,...,A^nv)$ is linearly dependent (1), $A_{n \times n}$, over $\mathbb{F^n}$ prove that scalars $c_0,c_1,..,c_n$ exist (such that not all of them are zeroes) such that the matrix $M=c_0I+c_1A+..+c_nA^n$ is singular.    First I'm not sure how (*) can be used here exactly. We can say that the sequence $(c_0I,c_1A,..,c_nA^n)$ resembles the sequence (1) where $v=I$. But here we have scalar $c_i$ so it's not exactly the same sequence.   Maybe I could say that the sequence $(c_0I,c_1A,..,c_nA^n)$ is linearly dependent because it has $n+1$ elements while over $dim\mathbb{F^n}=n$ $\quad$(2).  Intuitively I understand that suppose we sum all the matrices $c_iA^i$ and then in the last sum operation we get to some $c_jA^j$ and if it's a linear combination of other matrices then we can have such a $c_j$ that: $$ c_oI+\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} c_iA^i+c_jA^j=0 $$ But I don't think this is enough to prove.