16.04 Can't enable bluetooth
Bluetooth Broadcom 43142 isn't working
Canonical Post #2: What is the perfect, and how should I use it? Why is English written and read from left-to-right as opposed to right-to-left, top-to-bottom, or (not even sure any language does this) bottom-to-top? My users are sending me point data that were digitized using Google Earth. How can I convert their KML to a shapefile and vice versa? My supervisor asked me to find out which distribution represents a particular situation.  I have a VoIP generator that generates calls "uniformly" distributed between callers. This means that the volume per caller distribution is "almost" uniformly distributed between a minimum and maximum. So by running a test with 10000 users and a min value equal to 30 calls per week and a max value equal to 90 calls/week i obtain that not all the users respect this limits: we have some users that generate &lt;30 calls and some other users that generate >90 calls. It is clear that the obtained distribution is not uniform.  The situation is this:    He said that i have to perform a sort of numerical process in order to find some formulas that could define this distribution. Initially, as wrote before,we wanted to obtain a uniform (min,max) distribution (the green area in the figure) but this is not the case as proved with chi-square test.  Moreover the curve in figure is not symmetric, the probability of call generation below 30 call/week and greater that 90 call/week are not identical (it is high for 90calls/week). The variability of the number of generated call increases with the increasing call generation rates.   "Actually implementation of this distribution is nothing but assigning different call rates in a range for users in domain which indicates implementation of several delta functions. As the call rates increases the variability of the generated calls also increases with the average call rate and this leads to the asymmetric behavior of the curve." [cit. from the Voipgenerator documentation]  Someone can help me?I think that now i cannot use Q-Q plot because i don't know which theoretical distribution i have to use in order to compare it with my empirical data.  Sorry if I have stressed with a similar problem a few weeks ago, but initially we thought we could change the implementation, but now we cannot. Hence i have to discover the type of the distribution i obtained and i don't know how can i do this. Is there a rule of integration that corresponds to the quotient rule? Can I visit the UK with an EU permanent residence card? I am non EU national, living in a Schengen country for past 5 years. I hold Indian passport and EU permanent residence card valid for 5 years.   Can i go to UK for few days to visit friends without a visa?  I am aware that UK is not in Schengen, and Schengen visas and residence permits issued by Schengen country is not valid for United Kingdom? But what about the PR card issued by a Schengen country?  I am also aware that EU citizens carrying EU passport have no restrictions to visit UK. Migrated question's answers can be upvoted twice by the same user I'm trying to use the \citep command in Latex and my document class is elsarticle. The problem is that it displays numbers not authoryear citations in the text which is what I'm looking for. Here are related parts of my code:      \documentclass[preprint,11pt]{elsarticle}      \usepackage{natbib}   ...      \bibliographystyle{plainnat}      \bibliography{ML}   And I'm obviously using the \citep command like this:      I once read \citep{edelman1993magnetic}   And my .bib file looks like this:  @article{wolf2009regional, title={Regional brain activation changes and abnormal functional connectivity of the         ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during working memory processing in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder}, author={Wolf, Robert C and Plichta, Michael M and Sambataro, Fabio and Fallgatter,     Andreas J and Jacob, Christian and Lesch, Klaus-Peter and Herrmann, Martin J and     Sch{\"o}nfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos and Connemann, Bernhard J and Gr{\"o}n, Georg and others}, journal={Human brain mapping}, volume={30}, number={7}, pages={2252--2266}, year={2009}, publisher={Wiley Online Library} }   The result looks like:  I once read[1]   I'm looking for a result like this:  I once read(wolf., 2009)   Elsevier is actually looking for:  Text: All citations in the text should refer to:    Single author: the author's name (without initials, unless there is ambiguity) and the year of publication;  Two authors: both authors' names and the year of publication;  Three or more authors: first author's name followed by 'et al.' and the year of publication.    Thanks in advance How long does the new dwellers queue last? When clicking the radio room icon that attracts a new dweller to your vault, how long will they stay queued out in front of the vault for before giving up?  Or will they?  I'm at max population and would rather not kill existing dwellers to accommodate them in my vault. Docker ppa package for Ubuntu 19.10 Does someone knows if it exists some ppa packages source for the newest Ubuntu version 19.10 i had problem with that when i upgraded from Ubuntu 19.04 to 19.10 i didn't work? Exclude TeX.SE question titles from MathJax parsing in Hot Network Questions Recently, the TeX.SE question  got onto the Hot Network Questions list.  Like many questions on TeX.SE, it contains some TeX markup in its title.  Unfortunately, on , this markup gets parsed and rendered as math:    I propose that either:   the entire Hot Network Questions sidebar should be excluded from MathJax parsing by styling it with the tex2jax_ignore class, or at least, any hot questions from TeX.SE should be so excluded from MathJax parsing.   Or I suppose we could always implement , which asks for all questions with TeX in the title to be excluded from Hot Network Questions entirely.  That might be throwing out the baby with the bathwater, though.    Ps. This issue is partially masked by , which causes MathJax not to be rendered in many elements that are hidden by default and revealed using jQuery .show(), such as all but the first five questions in the Hot Network Questions sidebar.  The  user script contains a generic fix for that bug, so users who have it installed will see this issue more frequently, but it occurs even without SOUP whenever a question with TeX markup in the title happens to show up among the top five hot questions that are always visible by default. Determine whether $712! + 1$ is a prime number or not Let $n = 712! + 1$ If $n$ was a prime number then, by Wilson's theorem:  $ (712!)! \equiv -1 \pmod{712}$  The double factorial makes it seriously more difficult...  But We can require:  $$712!! + 1 \equiv 0 \pmod{712}$$  $$712 = 2\cdot 356$$   Hence: $712!! = 2^{356} 356!$  Lets compute: $356! \pmod{712}$. Obviously:  $$356! = (356 \cdot 2) \cdot (355!/2)  = 712 \cdot 355!/2$$  Then: $356! \pmod{712} \equiv 0$.   Now, $2^{356} \pmod{712}$  $2^{356} = 2^{6 + 350}$  Nevermind, what should I do? I'm trying to solve this problem from Hatcher 3.3.24.  Let $M$ be a closed connected 3-manifold, and write $H_1(M, \mathbb{Z})$ as $\mathbb{Z^r} \oplus T$ where $T$ is torsion. Show that $H_2(M, \mathbb{Z})$ is $\mathbb{Z^r}$ if $M$ is orientable or $\mathbb{Z^{r-1}} \oplus \mathbb{Z_2}$ if $M$ is not orientable. In particular $r \geq 1$ if $M$ is not orientable. Using exercise 6 construct examples showing there are no other restrictions on the homology groups of closed 3-manifolds. (In the nonorientable case consider the manifold $N$ obtained from $S^2 \times I$ by identifying $S^2 \times \{0\}$ with $S^2 \times \{1\}$ via a reflection of $S^2$.)  I think I've solved the first part, here's my proof:   First note the following theorem: If $M$ is a closed connected and orientable n-manifold then $H_n(M, \mathbb{Z}) = \mathbb{Z}$ and $Tors(H_{n-1}(M, \mathbb{Z})) = 0$. If nonorientable, then $H_n(M, \mathbb{Z}) = 0$, $Tors(H_{n-1}(M, \mathbb{Z})) = \mathbb{Z_2}$.  Now note by Poincare duality and UCT we have that $H_2(M) \cong H^1(M) \cong \mathbb{Z^r} \oplus T_0 \cong \mathbb{Z^r}$.   In the nonorientable case consider the exact sequence:  $0 \longrightarrow H_2(M) \longrightarrow H_1(M) \longrightarrow H_0(M) \longrightarrow 0$  But we know $H_1(M) = \mathbb{Z^r} \oplus Z_2$ from the earlier theorem and $H_0(M) = \mathbb{Z}$.   Therefore $H_2(M) \cong ker(\mathbb{Z^r} \oplus Z_2 \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Z^{r-1}} \oplus \mathbb{Z_2}$.   For the rest of the question I'm quite lost. What processing is done on RAW files in the camera? Recently I came across a debate about whether it's fair to call RAW 'unprocessed' or 'unaltered' sensor data of a DSLR. As far as I know, the analog sensor data is processed into a digital RAW file using the ISO setting, a process during which the Bayer-sensor data is demosaiced as well. However, those are just the necessary steps for saving a digital file while maintaining maximum quality.  Are those assumptions correct? If so, are there any additional steps that need to be performed between the sensor receiving light and the saving of the RAW file? And can those be reasonably be described as an 'alteration' of the sensor data, or is it fair to say that a RAW file holds the unaltered sensor data? asp.net mvc put controllers into a separate project How many attacks can a fighter with two-weapon fighting make at 5th level? What is the easiest/best/most correct way to iterate through the characters of a string in Java? StringTokenizer? Convert the String to a char[] and iterate over that? Something else? Align cell height of the tabularx rows The following latex code prints rows one at a time. However all the cells of the rows don't come out aligned. How can I fix it.   \documentclass{beamer}     \usepackage{tabularx}    \begin{document}  \begin{frame}{}  \begin{tabularx}{3.50in}{lXX}           \hline           &amp; Observation &amp; Conclusion \\           \hline             \uncover&lt;2-&gt;{1.} &amp; \uncover&lt;2-&gt;{Observation 1 } &amp; \uncover&lt;2-&gt;{Conclusion 1} \\   \uncover&lt;3-&gt;{2.} &amp; \uncover&lt;3-&gt;{Observation 2} &amp; \uncover&lt;3-&gt;{Conclusion 2} \\           \end{tabularx}      \end{frame}   \end{document}   The output looks as follows :    As we can see cells in first column do not align with the rest of the rows. Will appreciate any input as to how to fix this. How to access object attribute given string corresponding to name of that attribute If nonnegative $f: [0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ has a continuous $f''$, then $\int_0^1 \Big| \frac{f''(x)}{f(x)} \Big| \,dx >4$