Adding video file to iphone simulator path, but not showing in simulator
How to add video to iphone simulator
Want to fill line with repeating string Similar to the \dotfill command, but with your own text, rather than dots.  If the string was: kitty!  The entire line would look like the following: kitty!kitty!kitty!kitty!kitty!kitty!kitty!kitty!kitty!  Is there any way to do this? Protect Google Spreadsheet formatting while allowing changes to data I would like to protect the formatting of a cell (or a range of cells) in a Google Spreadsheet, but still allow changing the data in that (or those) cell(s).  For example, I want to add a validation rule on a cell that says the cell has to contain a number between 1 and 10, and I would like others to be able to change the value in that cell, but not the validation rule itself.  How do I do that?  So far I was only able to completely protect the cell (content + formatting) or not at all (the user can change the content as well as the formatting).  To me this seems to be an important functionality when adding access rights to spreadsheets. Is it possible that it is completely missing from Google Spreadsheets? What is a word for a person with more expertise (in certain field) than an intermediate but less so than an expert? Open Finder window from current Terminal location? If I am in a specific path in a Terminal window, how can I open that same window in a new Finder window?   Note: This is the opposite of . Smooth rendering of bitmap fonts There's already a question like this  so that my question could be considered duplicate, but I'll try to make my point clear that this is a different question.   Is there a way to derive  from the Lorentz' Force law or just from Maxwell's Equations?   The point is that we usually define, based on experiments, that the force felt by a moving charge on the presence of a magnetic field is $\mathbf {F} = q\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$, but in that case the magnetic field is usually left to be defined later.   Now can that force law be used in some way to obtain Biot-Savart law like we obtain the equation for the electric field directly from Coulomb's Force law?  I wanted to know that because as pointed out in the question I've mentioned, although Maxwell's Equations can be considered more fundamental, those equations are obtained after we know Coulomb's and Biot-Savart's laws, so if we start with Maxwell's Equations to obtain Biot-Savart's having use it to find Maxwell's Equations then I think we'll fall into a circular argument.   In that case, without recoursing to Maxwell's Equations the only way to obtain Biot-Savart's law is through observations or can it be derived somehow? Graduate school admission with a degree in a different field Why can't variable names start with numbers? I have this problem where I can't built slide documents with beamer every time I include a math environment as simple as $\mu = A$. The log file posts this message at the end:  !pdfTeX error: miktex-pdftex.exe (file mathkerncmssi10): Font mathkerncmssi10 a t 657 not found  ==&gt; Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!   I understand that the file (mathkerncmssi10) that is apparently missing is part of the package sansmathaccent, but the package is already there and updated.  This is driving me crazy, I would appreciate any help.    Sure, I tried this with several examples. I can post this one  \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usetheme{Warsaw} \title[Make a LaTeX presentation using Beamer]{Introduction  to Beamer\\How to make a presentation with LaTeX?} \author{Nadir Soualem -- Astozzia} \institute{Math-linux.com} \date{Jule 13, 2007} \begin{document} \begin{frame} \titlepage \end{frame} \begin{frame}{Introduction} This is a short introduction to Beamer class. $\mu=A$ \end{frame} \end{document}    By the way, it turns out that I just tried this one in another PC and works fine. What is the difference between a "proof by contradiction" and "proving the contrapositive"? Intuitive, it feels like doing the exact same thing. And when I compare an exercise, one person proves by contradiction, and the other proves the contrapositive, the proofs look almost exactly the same.  For example, say I want to prove: $P \implies Q$ When I want to prove by contradiction, I would say assume this is not true. Assume $Q$ is not true, and $P$ is true. Blabla, but this implies $P$ is not true, which is a contradiction.  When I want to prove the contrapositive, I say. Assume $Q$ is not true. Blabla, this implies $P$ is not true.  The only difference in the proof is that I assume $P$ is true in the beginning, when I want to prove by contradiction. But this feels almost redundant, as in the end I always get that this is not true. The only other way that I could get a contradiction is by proving that $Q$ is true. But this would be the exact same things as a direct proof.   Can somebody enlighten me a little bit here ? For example: Are there proofs that can be proven by contradiction but not proven by proving the contrapositve? "Everything is a file" in the UNIX World.  Above sentence is famous. When I run echo "hello programmer" &gt;&gt; /dev/tty1 , I can watch the given string on TeleType 1  , ....  What and where is file per each socket? Suppose my friend connects to my PC, and its IP is h.h.h.h , how can I access the respective file? Is it possible? Does being granted a Schengen visa and not going have any consequences? I'm granted a one-entry Schengen visa and now I can't go. Will having an unused visa in my travel passport have any consequences like future visas refusal? Do I need to do anything special? "Actually" vs "really" Add an alert when answering a question that has at least a close vote as duplicate I have one feature-request with the objective of having duplicate questions with no answers:   To (try to) avoid people answering duplicate questions, add an alert that says the question has a probable duplicate if it has a close vote as Exact duplicate, asking the answerer to go to the original and answer there.   What do you think? My objective is letting the duplicate question exist for search purposes, but the answers centralized in the root question. Among any three consecutive positive integers one is a multiple of 3 How do I prove that $ \displaystyle\lim_{n \to{+}\infty}{\sqrt[n]{n!}}$ is infinite? How do I change a close vote to a duplicate? Voted to close a question based on "lack of minimal understanding".  Later realized the question was a duplicate.  How to I change vote to mark as duplicate instead? Suppose $n$ is an even positive integer and $H$ is a subgroup of $\mathbb Z/n \mathbb Z$. Prove that either every element of $H$ is... Suppose $n$ is an even positive integer and $H$ is a subgroup of $\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z$. Prove that either every element of $H$ is even or exactly half of its elements are even. (Gallian, Contemporary Abstract Algebra, Exercise 24, Chapter 3.) Chapter 5: Are there multiple Endings? I just finished Episode 5 and wondered, if there were alternative endings or game branches. I brought the whole group with me, and am wondering what would have changed if different people accompined me, and if the episode is possible to play out differenly.      On my playthrough, Lee killed the stranger, and on the run back to Christa and Omid, was to weak to continue. Clementine shot him. Kenny died along with Ben after he fell off the building. And Lee was cut off Christa and Omid after they went over the "bridge" first. How to prevent Round with hidden fractions