Word for a person who is very much interested in having her photographs clicked?
A word used to describe someone who loves to be photographed
I heard the following comment of Mr. Marco Rubio about Mr. Donald Trump on CBS’s “Face the Nation” in a clip in February 29th AP Radio News:  “There is never gonna be a time where the Republican Party rallies around and says you have to get out or anyone has to get out for purposes of rallying around Donald Trump. Donald Trump is not Republican Conservative. Donald Trump is trying to pull off the biggest scam in American political history.”  I thought I misheard “There is never gonna be a time where –“ for “There is never gonna be a time when –“ at first, because I was in understanding that time should be trailed by “when” as a relative noun or adverb. An English Japanese dictionary at hand (Readers English Japanese Dictionary published by Kenkyusha) provides “where” singly as a relative to refer the ‘place.’ However, my lookup of the following two sources endorsed that I heard it right:  Here is what is never going to happen in this race. There's never going to be a time where the Republican Party rallies around and says you have to get out or anyone has to get out for purposes of rallying around Donald..  “Here is what is never going to happen,” Rubio continued. “There's never going to be a time where the Republican Party rallies around and says you have to get out or anyone has to ...   Is it common, at least not uncommon to use “where” after “time” as a relative? I made a simple FM transmitter following  and it worked! Now I need some help to understand how.  My coil is made of 1 mm copper wire has 6 turns and 8 mm wire diameter. According to this online calculator:  this means that: L = 3.9e-7 H  I did not have any 5 pF trim capacitor so I used a 3 pF capacitor instead.  Am I correct in assuming that the frequency this will transmit on can be found by looking at the L1 C2 as a LC oscillator and using the frequency formulae:  fR = 1/(2*pi*sqrt(LC))  ?  If so I should get fR = 147 MHz. Which is strange since I received the signal on 91.5 MHz on my radio.  In a LC circuit I understand that the signal decays exponentially over time. That is hopefully not happening here. Why? Because of C4 maybe?  Also what is the purpose of C1?  If I want to increase the range of this FM transmitter somewhat can I do this by simply replacing R2 with a 470 Ohm resistor?  Are there free simulator programs that let me see the resulting spectrum at the antenna? The separation between the two plates of a capacitor is increased I had the following question on a quiz recently:     A capacitor consisting of two parallel plates, separated by a distance $d$, is connected to a battery of EMF ε. What happens if the separation is doubled while the battery remains connected?    The correct answer was "The electric charge on the plates is halved." However, we were previously given a question in which a circuit consists of a capacitor of 6 μF and a resistor of 300,000 Ω connected to a battery, and the separation between the plates of the capacitor is quadrupled. However, in this circumstance, the charge on the capacitor immediately after the plates are separated remains the same, and the potential difference across the capacitor increases.   I am confused as to why these questions have different answers to them, despite having an extremely similar setup. My best guess is that the circuit in the second question also has a resistor, but I am not sure, and help would be greatly appreciated. In my ~/.bashrc file reside two definitions:   commandA, which is an alias to a longer path commandB, which is an alias to a Bash script   I want to process the same file with these two commands, so I wrote the following Bash script:    #!/bin/bash  for file in "$@"     do     commandA $file     commandB $file done   Even after logging out of my session and logging back in, Bash prompts me with command not found errors for both commands when I run this script.  What am I doing wrong? What's the best way to check if a String represents an integer in Java? I normally use the following idiom to check if a String can be converted to an integer.  public boolean isInteger( String input ) {     try {         Integer.parseInt( input );         return true;     }     catch( Exception e ) {         return false;     } }   Is it just me, or does this seem a bit hackish?  What's a better way?    See my answer (with benchmarks, based on the  by ) to see why I've reversed my position and accepted  to this problem.  I think this original code will be used by most people because it's quicker to implement, and more maintainable, but it's orders of magnitude slower when non-integer data is provided. Being characteristic is transitive Here, I wanted to verify that:     The property of being characteristic is a transitive relation among subgroups of a group $G$.   For subgroups $N,H\leq G$, we have $N$ char $G$ and $H$ char $N$. So $N$ char $G$ implies: $$\forall\psi\in Aut(G); \psi(N)=N$$ $H$ char $N$, so for all elements in $Aut(N)$, $H$ is remained never changing. Especially, when I take $\psi'=\psi|_{N}$ then $\psi':N\to Aut(N)$ would be in $Aut(N)$ and $\psi'(H)=H$. Since the last equality is true for $H$ and the maps, caused by restriction on $N$, then I have $H$ char $G$.  Honestly, I am inly not satisfied form the conclusion here and think I am losing something. Thanks for your hints. Where do electrons in electricity come from? Where do the electrons come from when an electric generator is making electricity?  Is from the air?  Would a generator work in a vacuum?  Electrons have mass so where would they be pulled from if there is nothing? How to show $\alpha\int_a^cf(x)dx+\beta \int_c^b f(x)dx =0$ means $f(x)=0$ everywhere $?$ Question :  Let $$f\ :\ [a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb R$$   be  continuous . And  there  exist  constants  $\alpha$  $\beta$  such  that  $\forall c\in [a,b]$  $$\alpha \int_a^c f(x)dx +\beta \int_c^b f(x)dx =0 $$   Prove  that  $f=0$  allover  $[a,b]$.  Attempt :(not much useful )   Since  the  equation  holds  for  all  $c\in [a,b]$   , if  take  $c=a$  then  we  have $$\beta \int_a^b f(x)dx =0 $$  And  taking  $c=b$  we  get $$\alpha \int_a^b f(x)dx=0 $$  See  if  both  $\alpha=0$  and  $\beta=0$  hold  then  there  is  nothing  to  do . If  only  one  of  them  is  $0$   and  the  other  is  non-zero  then  from  the  last  two  equations  we  get $$\int_a^b f(x)dx =0 $$ and  this  does   not  ensure   $f$'s  being  identically  $0$  on  $[a,b]$ (for  example : $f(x)=sin x$  and $a=0$,$b=2\pi $ ) .   So  our  only  possibility  is  that  both $\alpha \neq 0$  and $\beta \neq 0$  must  hold .  Now  I  cannot  proceed  any  further  from  this  point . Please  give  me  some   hints  as  to  what  to  do  next .  Thaanks. In my profile I saw this:     Accounts (48) - 1 hidden account   as seen in this image:        So, what is this "hidden account"? And how do I see it? Undefined reference error for template method Which should I use on my DB? - Clustered Index or Non Clustered Index or Both I just need advice on how I am going to optimize my database.  Date ---- Time ---- Area ---- Block ---- Data1 ---- Data2 ---- Data3 ---- DataN   I have that format of tables on my database. Each tables has 30-days of records with hundred thousands of records each data. Uploading of data to database is every morning. The data of yesterday will be uploaded.  The most common queries to run is grouped by Date or Date and Area or Date and Area and Block. Now, in order to make queries faster, I found out using indexes. I used indexes before. But that was when I am using a primary key. In this table, I didn't use primary key because it is totally unnecessary.   Now, I am really confused on how I am going to optimize this. Based on  on Column Considerations part, clustered index is not a good choice on Columns that undergo frequent changes. I am really confused.  Please help me if I need to use clustered index here or just non clustered or both. I would love to identify a sci-fi novel I read in the late 60s or 70s.  It followed a group of young space cadets through their training in the Space Academy.  The training culminated in small groups of cadets being sent through a gateway in the space station, into different worlds where they had to survive whatever conditions they met beyond the gateway, as part of their training.  One such trip went wrong and the group ended up stranded in a hostile world for days, hoping to be rescued by their trainers.  I can't remember much about the story or protagonists so this may be too vague, but I remember descriptions of a vast space station hall and these young cadets bringing whatever kit they hoped they might need - some brought breathing apparatus and full survival gear, but others came with very little as they believed they would not be sent into conditions where they could die without the right equipment.  They hadn't bargained for the power surge or whatever it was that misdirected them as they passed through the gateway!  I also remember rivalry between the cadets - I think the hero was male and quietly heading for top cadet of the year award... and I think at least one of the group died in the unknown planet before they were rescued.  Does this ring a bell with anyone?  I remember the mood and tension more than the details but it was a long time ago!  I have a 10-year old son who I think would love this kind of story.  If anyone can help you have my thanks! Make window always on top? Multivariable Delta Epsilon Proof $\lim_{(x,y)\to(0,0)}\frac{x^3y^2}{x^4+y^4}$ --- looking for a hint I have the limit $$\lim_{(x,y)\to(0,0)}\frac{x^3y^2}{x^4+y^4},$$ and would like to show with an $\epsilon-\delta$ proof that it is zero. I know with a situation like $$\left|\frac{x^4y}{x^4+y^4}\right|\leq y$$  or something similar, but I can't find a way to do the same thing here, as no single term in the numerator is of sufficient degree, although I think I could get this with a small hint. Is it possible to resize an image in an answer? For example,  has  that should have the image in the answer, but it's too big.  Is there a way to handle resizing? How to remove a filter that is an anonymous object? Getting error message when trying to start a virtual machine I have been using VMWare on Windows for a long time. But after a long wait, I moved to VirtualBox on Ubuntu 11.10. I installed Ubuntu, 32 Bit, installed all available updates and installed Virtual Box. When I try to create a new Windows installation inside VirtualBox, I got the following error messages.  VirtualBox - Error  Failed to open a session for the virtual machine Windows XP. The virtual machine '**Windows XP**' has terminated unexpectedly during startup with exit code 1. Details  Result Code: NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005) Component: Machine Interface: IMachine {5eaa9319-62fc-4b0a-843c-0cb1940f8a91}   2nd error dialogue  Virtualbox - Error in suplibOsinit Kernal driver not installed (rc--1908) Please install the virtualbox-dkmbs package and execute 'modprobe vboxdrv' as root.    I have already tried reinstalling VirtualBox. Google result seem to indicate the the problem happens due to Kernel updates.   Is there anyway I can get this working? I need this for malware analysis and if VirtualBox is going to crash on me all the time, then I won't be able to use Ubuntu for work.  Output to dpkg -l | grep virtual   server rc  virtualbox                             4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1                     x86 virtualization solution - base binaries rc  virtualbox-qt                          4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1                     x86 virtualization solution - Qt based user interface  cute 'modprobe vboxdrv' as root.&lt;p&gt; How can I make a time delay in Python? Suppose $X$ is binomial $B(n,p)$. How can I find the probability that $X$ is even ?  I know $$P(X = k ) = \frac{ n!}{(n-k)!k!} p^k(1-p)^{n-k} $$  where $X=1,....,n$. Are they just asking to find $P(X = 2m )$ for some $m &gt; 0$ ? Suppose we are in $\mathbb R^n$. What can we say about the sign of $\Delta u(\vec x)$ if u($\vec x$) has a local max/min at $\vec x$? I've tried looking at the reverse of the second partial derivative test and it seems to suggest that $\Delta u(\vec x) \leq 0$ if $\vec x$ is a min and $\Delta u(\vec x) \geq 0$ if $\vec x$ is a max. However, I'm not convinced of this result. Can somebody point me towards a statement (theorem, etc.) involving the above. I appreciate the help.