Why we need to explicitly initialize the final variable of a class?
Why must a final variable be initialized before constructor completes?
Can I install the 64 bit version? Explain what is a transistor in plain English! Do neutrinos not couple to the Higgs field? I was reading the CernCourier, my favorite source of message on Higgs and friends. I was rather shocked, when I saw this:     "The mechanism by which neutrino mass is generated is not known."   What? Not known?  says: In Higgs-based theories, the property of 'mass' is a manifestation of potential energy transferred to particles when they interact ("couple") with the Higgs field, which had contained that mass in the form of energy.  Does this mean that neutrinos don't couple to the Higgs field? What is the best way to store user settings for a .NET application? I have a .NET 2.0 Windows Forms application. Where is the best place the store user settings (considering Windows guidelines)?  Some people pointed to Application.LocalUserAppDataPath. However, that creates a folder structure like:     C:\Documents and Settings\user_name\Local Settings\Application   Data\company_name\product_name\product_version\   If I release version 1 of my application and store an XML file there, then release version 2, that would change to a different folder, right? I'd prefer to have a single folder, per user, to store settings, regardless of the application version. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ What is the metal sheath surrounding a USB connector, and is it commonly connected? How does $e^{i x}$ produce rotation around the imaginary unit circle? I know that matrix multiplication in general is not commutative. So, in general:  $A, B \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}: A \cdot B \neq B \cdot A$  But for some matrices, this equations holds, e.g. A = Identity or A = Null-matrix $\forall B \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$.  I think I remember that a group of special matrices (was it $O(n)$, the ?) exist, for which matrix multiplication is commutative.  For which matrices $A, B \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ is $A\cdot B = B \cdot A$? $I_m - AB$ is invertible if and only if $I_n - BA$ is invertible. The problem is from  Algebra by Artin, Chapter 1, Miscellaneous Problems, Exercise 8. I have been trying for a long time now to solve it but I am unsuccessful.      Let $A,B$ be $m \times n$ and $n \times m$ matrices. Prove that $I_m - AB$ is invertible if and only if $I_n - BA$ is invertible.    Please provide with only a hint. I've found plenty of posts about changing the visibility of a block programatically.  My problem is the opposite. Given a block's ID/delta, how do I find out if it should be displayed at the current path?  I have a field collection that allows you to append a block using the Block Reference module (I preprocess the field collection and use my own template, so the logic has been taken away from the Block Reference module). It works, but I only want it to kick in if the "Show block on specific pages" rule says that block should be displayed. Could "them" mean "those"? Background Nowadays, I see &quot;them&quot; used to mean &quot;those&quot; a lot. I don't know if it was as common in the past. For example, take &quot;one of &quot;. On researching about it, I found some people say it comes from a dialect of British English. Some others say it is a &quot;non-standard&quot; usage. I see this usage in Canadian English also, and it seems some people use it in a sarcastic way. Moreover, I have seen a song titled &quot;one of them days&quot;. I also read, in the book called &quot;A Broken Promise&quot;, &quot;&quot; Finally, Wikipedia says that it is a usage in  (a common name for the Southern Midland dialect of American English):  Pronouns and demonstratives &quot;Them&quot; is sometimes used in place of &quot;those&quot; as a demonstrative in both nominative and oblique constructions. Examples are &quot;Them are the pants I want&quot; and &quot;Give me some of them crackers.&quot;    Question(s): What would you say about the usage of this word? Is it correct? Could we use it in daily speech? Could this usage go beyond a specific dialect and be used in other dialects, regions, etc.? Does it really originate from Appalachian English? Why did this usage become popular among other English speakers? Note: I have already seen a similar question:  However, it only says, &quot;ungrammatical,&quot; there. This question is specific to this situation only, and there is more to it. How to see python symbolic names of objects on cursor hover of menu items in Blender 2.8 in Blender 2.79 one could hover over a UI element and see the symbolic python name of said element. How would one accomplish the same with Blender >= 2.8? An excerpt from Introduction to Analytic Number Theory by Tom M. Apostol.      I have three main concerns regarding this proof:    What is the abscissa of convergence for $\frac{1}{F(s)}$ - why can we take the product of the two series. I only know this is true if the two series are absolutely convergent.  Why can we do term by term integration? I believe its suffices to show that the series converges locally uniformly - BUT is this true?  How does the proof show that $G(s)$ converges uniformly? Getting absolute path of a file Literature: 'Why' at the beginning of sentences I’m currently reading George Martin’s A Song Of Ice And Fire novels in English. As a non-native speaker (I’m German), I stumbled upon some grammatical constructs that I’ve never seen before, one of them being the Why at beginning of sentences.  Examples:   Tyrion gave the rotting head a second look. Why, it almost looks as if those lips are smiling. Did he use that word? Why, the boy has a singer's soul . . . though if you believe that song, you may well be dimmer than the first Reek.   These kind of sentences are obviously different from sentences like Why is the sky blue?  I’d like to know if that construct is archaic, or could be used in everyday language, and how one could rephrase that kind of sentences. Can it be rephrased at all? To me it seems like the Why is just used to give the sentence a kind of “cynical” taste. is uniform convergent sequence leads to bounded function? Suppose there is there is uniform convergent sequence $(f_n)$ on the set $A$, and each $f_n$ is bounded on $A$, i.e., there exist $M_n&gt;0$ such that $|f_n(x)|\le M_n$ for all $x\in A$ Is it true that there exist a function $f$ that is bounded on set A? Can I prove it this way:  Since $f_n \to f$ uniformly on A, $\exists n \ge N$ such that $$|f_N(x) - f(x)| \le 1$$ and $$|f_n(x)-f_N(x)| \le 1$$  Therefore, $|f(x)| \le |f_N(x)|+1 \le M_N + 1$ and $|f_n(x)| \le |f_N(x)| + 1 \le M_N + 1$, $x \in A , n \ge N$  Let $M = \max\{M_1, M_2,\dots,M_N\} + 1$ : $|f_n(x)| \le M$, $\forall x\in A$  Therefore, $f$ is a bounded function on A. Finding the 1st three derivatives of a function and plotting all four curves Is it possible to run some code when an assembly is loaded, without doing anything specific in the loading code? What I am looking for is like a static constructor on a type.  Eg:  Assembly A does not know about Assembly B, but B does know about A. Assembly A needs to know certain things about B if B is loaded. When Assembly B is loaded by the runtime (referenced, or explicit), I want a piece of code (static method or attribute) to be executed that calls a method in Assembly A.  The root cause of this problem is unknown types being encountered when serializing a type in A that contains types from B not known at compile time as interfaces are used. Simple question.   SO had turned me into a better developer by far, I like to browse questions that strike my interest and curiosity and just read through the answers. I never fail to learn something new everyday, whether it's something trivial or something much more complex.  When I receive reputation it means a lot to me, almost a self achievement of sorts. Something I can show to someone to prove my "worth". I think it works for me as a great confidence booster, also its something I can show my friends who don't understand what I do.   It almost feels like I can finally have something to back me up if need to be.  So the question is what does YOUR reputation mean to YOU? Is it simply a number, is it a score as if you're playing a game, or does it help you mentally achieve your goals and improve yourself like it does for me. How can I match a quote-delimited string with a regex? If I'm trying to match a quote-delimited string with a regex, which of the following is "better" (where "better" means both more efficient and less likely to do something unexpected):  /"[^"]+"/ # match quote, then everything that's not a quote, then a quote   or  /".+?"/   # match quote, then *anything* (non-greedy), then a quote   Assume for this question that empty strings (i.e. "") are not an issue. It seems to me (no regex newbie, but certainly no expert) that these will be equivalent.   Update: Upon reflection, I think changing the + characters to * will handle empty strings correctly anyway. How is the "charge on a capacitor" defined when two plates are unequally charged? In Concepts of Physics by Dr.. H.C.Verma, in the chapter on "Capacitors", in page 144, under the topic "Capacitor and Capacitance" the following statement is given:     A combination of two conductors placed close to each other is called a capacitor. One of the conductors is given a positive charge and the other is given an equal negative charge. The conductor with the positive charge is called the positive plate and the other is called the negative plate. The charge on the positive plate is called the charge on the capacitor …   Note that the term charge on a capacitor does not mean the total charge given to the capacitor.   (Emphasis mine)  According to the above statement, "the charge on the capacitor" is the charge on the positive plate when both positive and negative plates of a capacitor are equally charged? How to extend this definition when the two plates are unequally charged?   Suppose we supply charges $+Q_1$ and $-Q_2$ to the positive and the negative plates respectively. After electrostatic conditions are attained, I determined the charge distribution on the four surfaces - outer surfaces and inner surfaces of the two plates. The charge on the outer surfaces of the two plates are equal to $\frac{Q_1-Q_2}{2}$. The magnitude of charge on the inner surface of the two plates is $\frac{Q_1+Q_2}{2}$.   Now coming to my doubt, if the "charge on the capacitor" is the charge on the positive plate, which surface of the positive plate should I want to consider - the outer one or the inner one? And what is the reason for this choice? It seems to me that, a capacitor with unequal charges on its plates is not a capacitor in the first place (inferred from the statement above).