How can I obtain items that exceed their maximum enchantment level?
How do I use an NBT editor to modify item properties?
In English, words with a 'g' followed by a front vowel (e, i, y) can be pronounced with a soft g or a hard g:   Words with Germanic roots are usually pronounced with a hard g: gear, get, gift, give Words with Latin and Greek roots are usually pronounced with a soft g: gem, general, giraffe, giant   But how should a purely English word (if such thing even exists) with a 'g' followed by a front vowel be pronounced? In other words, if an English speaker saw a new word of unknown origin (eg: a neologism) that starts with gi- or ge-, how would they pronounce it? I have recently purchased a hybrid bike with suspension (not sure if that is relevant to this question). It came with two pieces of plastic. Any ideas what they may be for? Is it possible to raise stats? The problem Comments are terrible; no one agrees on what they're for, or how long they should be kept. Comment flags are equally terrible, because if no one's on the same page as far as what should be posted in the first place then no one can agree on what should be removed either. On top of that, we have this confusing set of flags where two mean &quot;noise&quot;, one means &quot;vile&quot;, one means &quot;moderator, help!&quot; and one means nothing at all - the end result is that it's all but impossible to even analyze comment flagging. The solution (or, part of it) Two years ago, in a fit of rage, I . Nothing got done. As always, everyone has a different idea of how things are supposed to work, and I'd bitten off more than I could chew. So, here we are, two years later, and comment flags still suck. So let's start by just cutting the fat: if we can trim down the list of flags to a set of clearly distinct problems, we might have something we can build on. Here's what I'm proposing, based on the past two years of discussion:   Re-word the &quot;rude or offensive&quot; flag to read,  rude or abusive: this comment violates .   Remove the &quot;not constructive&quot;, &quot;obsolete&quot; and &quot;too chatty&quot; flags.  Add a new comment flag:  no longer needed: this comment is obsolete, chatty or otherwise unnecessary   Re-word the &quot;other...&quot; flag:  in need of moderator attention: these comments require action by a moderator. Be specific and detailed!    That's it; that's all I'm proposing to start out - simplify things so that we have something to build on. See also: I have taken three fields from case object called AccountName, IntegrationTo__c and SfType__c (checkbox).  I have created one case record with a specific combination of three fields.  For the second time I create a record with that combination, then  display error message only if SfType__c is true in first record otherwise allow  for record creation.  trigger AvoidDuplicate on Case(before insert)  {          set&lt;string&gt; newNameSet = new set&lt;string&gt;();     newNameSet = new set&lt;string&gt;();      set&lt;string&gt; newEmailSet = new set&lt;string&gt;();      set&lt;string&gt; dbNameSet = new set&lt;string&gt;();      set&lt;string&gt; dbEmailSet = new set&lt;string&gt;();      for(Case newLead : trigger.new){          newNameSet.add(newLead.Account.Name);          newEmailSet.add(newLead.IntegrationTo__c);      }      for(Case dbLead : [select id, Case.Account.Name, IntegrationTo__c from Case where IntegrationTo__c IN: newEmailSet OR Case.Account.Name IN: newNameSet]){          dbNameSet.add(dbLead.Account.Name);          dbEmailSet.add(dbLead.IntegrationTo__c);      }      for(Case newLead : trigger.new){          if(dbNameSet.contains(newLead.Account.Name) &amp;&amp; dbEmailSet.Contains(newLead.IntegrationTo__c))              newLead.addError('You are inserting Duplicate Case');      }  }   i wrote this this not checking the account field name and integration__c values only with combination of account and integration__c shows error How can I make NON-fluffy pancakes? Every recipe I can find is for "fluffy" pancakes.  I prefer thinner, slightly crispy, (very) slightly chewy, non-fluffy pancakes.  Basically, the less "cake-like" the better.  Apparently I'm the only one, and these are all non-desirable qualities in a pancake, so it is hard to find recipes.  How can I make non-fluffy pancakes?  I will be using a cast-iron pan. number length limit in SOQL Where condition When I execute SOQL in Developer Console:  Select Id, Amount From Opportunity Where Amount &gt; 10000000000   An parsing error occurs:  Unknown error parsing query   Is there length limit of number on SOQL Where condition? Word order: "10 minutes more" or "10 more minutes"? Since  from other SE sites and is not thought to point out a lack of quality or helpfulness, but only to express agreement or disagreement, I'm wondering why downvoted answers here on meta are shown semi-transparent.  Shouldn't they be non-transparent then (like upvoted answers)?  Or am I missing something? How do I properly access Windows software RAID 0? I am a new Ubuntu user with a fresh installation, and am eager to get started with it. However, all of my important data is on Windows software RAID 0 array, and I need it to stay there as I'm also dual booting Windows. I need access to this data on Ubuntu, and can't really get anything real done until I have access.  I have already researched this subject as best as I could, and I managed to find a very helpful post:      The post describes how to get Ubuntu to see a Windows RAID 0 array that is made up of two drives. The main command used is sudo mdadm --build /dev/md0 --chunk=64 --level=0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdd2 /dev/sdc2. According to that user, and the other posters in the thread, it actually does work. That's great.  I have not tried following these instructions yet. Why? The post includes a warning about how you must not write to it if you enter the wrong chunk size; it's understandable how that could cause problems. My concern is that my setup is different to their example, and I am not sure that the commands should be entered exactly the same for my setup. I am afraid to break it by doing it wrong, and therefore wish to get the advice of somebody more experienced.  This is how my setup differs from their example:   I have three 1 TB drives, not two drives (of whatever size they used). I have two RAID 0 partitions spread across those three drives: one 500 GB and 2.3 TB. This means that I need to NOT use the full disks when creating the RAID array, but instead use just part of them. I used a non-default block size for at least one of my RAID 0 partitions when I set them up years ago. I have no idea if this block size is the same as the chunk size that they mention. My 500 GB partition has a block size of 4 kb (4096 bytes per cluster), and my 2.3 TB partition has a block size of 64 kb (65536 bytes per cluster).   The relevant output from sudo lsblk -o NAME,FSTYPE,SIZE,MOUNTPOINT,LABEL (for just those three RAID0 drives) is:  NAME   FSTYPE   SIZE MOUNTPOINT            LABEL sdb           931.5G             ├─sdb1            1M             ├─sdb2          127M             └─sdb3        931.4G             sdc           931.5G             ├─sdc1            1M             ├─sdc2          127M             └─sdc3        931.4G             sdd           931.5G             ├─sdd1        166.7G             └─sdd2        764.7G    The relevant output from cat /proc/partitions (for just those three RAID0 drives) is:  8       16  976762584 sdb 8       17       1024 sdb1 8       18     130048 sdb2 8       19  976631478 sdb3 8       32  976762584 sdc 8       33       1024 sdc1 8       34     130048 sdc2 8       35  976631478 sdc3 8       48  976762584 sdd 8       49  174763008 sdd1 8       50  801865728 sdd2   The "Disks" program in Ubuntu displays the following partitions for my drives:  /dev/sdb:   GUID Partition Table . /dev/sdb1:  1.0 MB, Microsoft LDM metadata. /dev/sdb2:  133 MB, Microsoft Reserved. /dev/sdb3:  1.0 TB, Microsoft LDM data. /dev/sdc:   GUID Partition Table partitioning. /dev/sdc1:  1.0 MB, Microsoft LDM metadata. /dev/sdc2:  133 MB, Microsoft Reserved. /dev/sdc3:  1.0 TB, Microsoft LDM data. /dev/sdd:   Master Boot Record partitioning. /dev/sdd1:  179 GB, Unknown. /dev/sdd2:  821 GB, Unknown. /dev/sdd:   136 MB, Unallocated space.   I hope I've provided enough information here. So now, my question is this: what is the proper command for me to enter with my setup, so that I can access both of my Windows RAID 0 partitions from Ubuntu?  Thank you very much in advance. Retagging questions in terms of possible answer technologies When entering the title of this query I was pointed to , which has tentatively endorsed this concept, especially once an answer has been accepted.  Can I get a confirmation that it is actually good practice before an answer has been accepted? (IMHO it is not.)  Two examples:   : I didn't need a WCF answer, which I would have assumed if I had seen the question tagged with WCF even if I didn't mention it in the question or title.   : It looks probable that the answer (if there is one) is related to AOP, but the questioner does not require it. What is the maximum or minimum tire width I can fit on my bicycle In a very small static universe with only a particle, does it make sense to talk about time? I am sorry if this question is silly; it′s just one of those things I wished I asked before leaving university.  If there were a static universe only as big as the size of two particles, say electrons, and there were one electron in it going back and forth from point A to point B: would time also go back and forth in the future (point B) and in the past (point A), or would it be considered to  go forward as it does for us? would it be possible to know how long that electron stayed at point A or point B, would it even make sense to ask? I guess what I am asking is: does time move forward only because there are so many particles moving in this enormous space that it is almost impossible they would all be back in the same position they held at least once before relative to each other? does time exist only as a consequence of a lot of particles and their position relative to each other, and the space for them, just like heat? What issues should be considered when overriding equals and hashCode in Java? I think I've got it down to the most basic case:  int main(int argc, char ** argv) {   int * arr;    foo(arr);   printf("car[3]=%d\n",arr[3]);   free (arr);   return 1; }  void foo(int * arr) {   arr = (int*) malloc( sizeof(int)*25 );   arr[3] = 69; }   The output is this:  &gt; ./a.out   car[3]=-1869558540  a.out(4100) malloc: *** error for object 0x8fe01037: Non-aligned pointer                          being freed  *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug &gt;   If anyone can shed light on where my understanding is failing, it'd be greatly appreciated. Bevel specific edges Show: $ f(a) = a,\ f(b) = b \implies \int_a^b \left[ f(x) + f^{-1}(x) \right] \, \mathrm{d}x = b^2 - a^2 $ Interpretation of interaction term I have a model: $$ \ln({\rm earnings}) = a+b_1{\rm female}+b_2{\rm white}+b_3{\rm female}\times{\rm white} $$ ${\rm female}$ and ${\rm white}$ are dummy variables.  I have interpreted $b_1$ and $b_2$:    $b_1$ = change in female earnings comparing to male given you are non white $b_2$ = change in white earnings comparing to non white given you are male   But I am unable to interpret the coefficient of the interaction term ($b_3$). Please help me with this.  Let me make it more clear what I need out of this regression $$ \ln({\rm earnings}) = 2.618656-.0899657{\rm female}+.382019{\rm white}-.2754126 {\rm female}\times{\rm white} $$ Now i know there is gender pay difference with b1, i also know there is race pay difference with b2. Now with b3 i need to know is their a gender pay gap for whites only. How can i figure that out with regression above and without test. Title of novel with girl who can read minds by observing body language, later communicates with a hive mind on an alien planet's surface As a kid I was greatly influenced by a book where a girl (I believe her name was Marlena) lived in a ship orbiting an alien planet.  The ship was intended to colonize the planet but the humans had encountered difficulty.  People on the surface early on had gone incurably mad.  The planet was covered with single cell organism, but no other life.  Other than the "bacteria" it was sterile.    The girl, along with most of the colonists, was still living on the orbiting ship for the foreseeable future.  The girl had an uncanny knack of reading people's minds by noting minute changes in behavior and body language, kind of like Sherlock Holmes' famous observations.  Eventually she got a chance to go to the surface, and found the planet trying to communicate with her.  In one memorable scene the swirls in the water of a stream formed a face and started trying to call her name, "Eeeena, Aaleeena, Aarleena, Marlena!"  It turns out that the single celled organisms on the planet comprised a hive mind which had tried to communicate telepathically with previous humans by altering their brains slightly, causing the madness.  The girls's brain was different, however, constantly modifying and changing itself so that it was not damaged by the hive mind's attempts to communicate with it. How can you prove that the normal equations: $(X^TX)\beta = X^TY$ have one or more solutions without the assumption that X is invertible?  My only guess is that it has something to do with generalized inverse, but I am totally lost.