How to print number in only sql statement
SQL to generate a list of numbers from 1 to 100
Sometimes (old) comments break the parser, so it would be nice to view their code to check what was (actually) supposed to be there. Is there any way to view a comment's source just like the source link in a post's revision?  edit Another application for this would be the ability to better quote comments in an answer without having to re-markdown them. Auto comment "possible duplicate of ..." missing on voting to close as duplicate Are there areas of mathematics (current or future) that cannot be formalized in set theory? I often read that ZFC can formalize "most" of everyday mathematics, but I could never find an example which it cannot. The closest I got is differential geometry (DF), where some article mentions that the translation from concepts of DF into set theory would render it almost "meaningless", in the sense that any intuitions one could have would be lost in the translation. So, if I didn't misunderstand, at least in theory, the translation could be done, so that a future AI machine could prove theorems of differential geometry using set theory. On the other hand, the Stanford Encyclopedia of  Philosophy states that "all of mathematics can be reduced to a formal system of set theory"().   So, the questions are:    Is there any current area of mathematics that could be not formalized within set theory? If so, which ones? and  Is there any reason to think that every math of the future will be always formalizable in set theory? any references to read on the subject are welcomed!   Clarification: by set theory I am not restricting to ZFC, but to any flavor of it, including all additional axioms you want (about large cardinals or any kind) How do I switch to first person? Is the double dash still the posix standard for long switches? Making layer or group private/hidden/invisible in Layers Panel of QGIS I have a number of layers in the Layers Panel inside a group but I don't want them shown (there's quite a lot so it looks untidy). These layers are also joined to several others. Is it possible to make these layers invisible to the user (i.e. not shown in the Layers Panel, it is not about setting the visibility of the layer) but can still be joined to other layers, or perhaps to make the group invisible? Closest I found was this post but hoping there's a more direct approach: paragraph numbering I am using the paragraph section head, i.e.,   \paragraph{This is a cool paragraph}    I would like it to compile with numbering. If I change the secnumdepth (i.e., \setcounter{secnumdepth}{4}) this will work, but produce the "wrong" type of numbering, i.e.,      1.1.1.1 This is a cool paragraph      1.1.1.2 This is another cool paragraph etc.   What I would like is      1 This is a cool paragraph      2 This is another cool paragraph   or, if not,      1.1 This is a cool paragraph      1.2 This is another cool paragraph   where the first 1 indicates the section number and suppresses the subsection and subsubsection numbers. Can this be done? Does "Root A" follow the fact about Takatsuki and the One-Eyed Owl? In Root A, Takatsuki does seem to be fascinated by Kaneki's name, but,      I didn't at all expect her to be the One-Eyed Owl.   I just looked her up on the  and it says that       she is the One Eyed-Owl as well as the horror novelist.   Is this true only in the manga or is it also true in Root A? Combine and Minify Multiple CSS / JS Files Is "do something by date X" inclusive? Possible Duplicate:          For example, if John says:      Return it to me by March 24th.    Does it mean that I need to return it to him before 23:59 p.m. March 24th, or before 23:59&nbsp;p.m. March&nbsp;23rd? System Load Indicator only shows as a line unless hovered I installed the  GNOME extension on my Ubuntu 18.04, but for some reason, instead of showing a proper graph for CPU usage, it only shows a very thin line that seems to be a small portion of the actual graph. If I hover over it, the proper graph shows. How to make it show the whole graph all the time? Let $f(n) = \sum_{(k,n)=1} e^\frac{2\pi ik}{n}$. Show that $f(n) = \sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\sum_{d\mid (k,n)} \mu(d)e^{\frac{2\pi ik}{n}} \right) $ 2.5 GB usable out of 4 GB of ram I was working on a problem that resulted in the calculation: $20 \equiv 10x \pmod{11}$.  I got the answer $x \equiv 2 \pmod{11}$ with the thought process: Since $10$ is a factor of $20$ I can rewrite $20 \pmod{11}$ as $10x \pmod{11}$ with $x=2$. But isn't this basically the same as using division, which we aren't supposed to do in modular spaces?  If I solve by multiplying $20$ by the multiplicative inverse of $10 \pmod{11}$ which is $10$, I get $200 \pmod{11}$ which simplifies to $2 \pmod{11}$ anyway. Did these numbers just happen to be the same or is my original method valid? How can I split a beamer bibliography across two slides? $x^{x^{x^{\dots}}}=2$, what is the value of $x$? I came up with this little simple exercise, stating:  $x^{x^{x^{\dots}}}$ infinite times is equal to $2$, find $x$.   As we're dealing with infinity, we can just separate the first $x$ and get $x^2=2 \implies x=\sqrt2$  But then I thought what if we change $2$ to $4$? Now we get $x^4=4 \implies x=\sqrt[4]4=\sqrt2$  Something went wrong, can someone explain? What is the opposite of "preaching to the choir"? There is a classic problem:  Suppose that $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ form an i.i.d. sample from a uniform distribution on the interval $(0,\theta)$, where $\theta&gt;0$ is unknown. I would like to find the MLE of $\theta$.  The pdf of each observation will have the form: $$ f(x\mid\theta) =  \begin{cases} 1/\theta\quad&amp;\text{for }\, 0\leq x\leq \theta\\ 0 &amp;\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} $$ The likelihood function therefore has the form: $$ L(\theta) = \begin{cases} 1/\theta^n \quad&amp;\text{for }\; 0\leq x_i \leq \theta\;\; \text{for all }i,\\ 0 &amp;\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} $$ The general solution is usually that the MLE of theta must be a value of $\theta$ for which $\theta \geq x_i$ and which maximizes $1/\theta^n$ among all such values.   The reasoning is that since $1/\theta^n$ is a decreasing function of $\theta$, the estimate will be the smallest possible value of $\theta$ such that $\theta\geq x_i$.  Therefore, the mle of $\theta$, $\hat{\theta}$, is $\max(X_1,\ldots,X_n)$.  Here, I do not understand why we cannot just differentiate the likelihood function with respect to theta and then set it equal to $0$?  Thanks! Intuitive proof of $\sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{n}{k} k^{k-1} (n-k)^{n-k} = n^n$ Is there an intuitive way, though I am not sure how to find a conceptual proof either, to establish the following identity: $$\sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{n}{k} k^{k-1} (n-k)^{n-k} = n^n$$ for all natural numbers.  I am thinking about binomial formula $$\sum_{k=0}^n\binom nk x^{n-k}y^k=(x+y)^n$$ but I'm not sure how to use it.  I find this problem tantalizing because it looks as if there should be some sort of intuitive way so that is why I share it here. I am looking for an answer like  if possible. Can you find one? Can I pickle a python dictionary into a sqlite3 text field? Any gotchas I should be aware of?  Can I store it in a text field, or do I need to use a blob? (I'm not overly familiar with either pickle or sqlite, so I wanted to make sure I'm barking up the right tree with some of my high-level design ideas.)