List attributes of an object
Is there a built-in function to print all the current properties and values of an object?
Short brandable domain vs. long keyword domain I need a counsel about my websites' domain.  Let's say I have just bought two domains: xyz.com and xyzphotography.com.  As we can see, the first one is shorter but way less meaningful than the second one. The second one contains a photography keyword but it's longer.  I have only one website which is my photography portfolio. Can you advise me how to set those domains to make it all as SEO-friendly as possible? Which one should be the main one, does the rest should work on their own or have some kind of SEO-friendly redirect to the main domain? How do I get help for "echo" or other bash commands? man echo works. but out of curiosity, does echo have something similar to a --help flag/parameter? How do I write to NTFS drives in OS X? Application of Liouville's Theorem Let $f(z)$ be an entire function such that $$|f(z)|&lt;\frac{1}{|\text{Im}(z)|},\qquad z\in\Bbb C-\Bbb R.$$ The question asked me to prove that $f(z)=0$. At least looking at it, it really seems to have an application of Liouville's theorem lurking around somewhere, but I haven't found it.   My thoughts first led me to think about doing this by contradiction and using Picard's little theorem. So, I've considered a strip containing the real axis (say of width $2$ for simplicity). This will imply the complement maps into the unit disk, which implies that this strip has to map almost everywhere else on the complex plane. Now, on the imaginary axis, I know that $f(z)$ will vanish as $z\to\infty$, and this seems like it might be useful. I'm sort of under the impression $f(z)$ might have an essential singularity at $\infty$, which would mean $f(1/z)$ has an essential singularity at $0$. Either way, it of course can't have a pole at $\infty$ because of $f(z)$ vanishing on the imaginary axis, and if it is a removable singularity, it must be $0$, which still gives the solution. Therefore, I think it must have something to do with $f(z)$ having an essential singularity at $\infty$.   I was hoping to combine this with the above inequality and deduce a contradiction, but I haven't thought of one yet.   Any hints or suggestions? I'm studying for a prelim. exam, so this isn't homework.  Update: So, in the spirit of searching methods using the essential singularity at $z=0$, we have $$\left|f\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right|\leq\frac{1}{\left|\text{Im}\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right|}=\frac{|z|^2}{|y|}.$$ Thus, for $|y|&gt;1$, we have $$\left|f\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right|&lt;|y|\left|f\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right|&lt;|z|^2.$$ Thus, if I can show that $|f(1/z)|$ is a polynomial, we'll know it can't have an essential singularity at the origin, concluding my proof. I have heard that some issues in group theory prevent classifying all manifolds upto homotopy using the fundamental group invariant. Does anyone know what are those issues?  Thanks, K. If virtual particles sometimes add more mass/energy to a system then was inputed or comes out in the output, how do they not violate conservation of mass/energy. How do I add the kernel PPA? Can summons and eidolons be magically healed? This is a two part question.   Can summons benefit from ? Can  benefit from magical healing? This question treats normal and unchained summoners as equal unless there is a specific difference where it concerns healing.   I have looked at the  spell and it does not say that the monster summoned actually exists (for instance the eidolon specifically states that its an aspect of the creature and not the creature itself) or if its an aspect of a greater creature.  Reading cure light wounds it talks about what happens with living and undead, but nothing else is mentioned. found a 1994 uncashed profit sharing retirement plan check I found an old un-cashed check dated 1994 for $487 from my Xerox Retirement plan with no expiration date. Can I still cash it? How to tell which row number is clicked in a table? Please bring back the oldest sort order for answers, I think we can deal with four different types of sort order.  It's helpful if you don't want to have to tool-tip every post to see which got posted first, so that you can upvote the oldest answer when answers duplicate each other.  Edit:  Also, trying to read newest backwards doesn't work well for questions with multiple pages of answers. What is an observer in quantum mechanics? mysterious error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pdfstartlink I ran into the "mysterious"  \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pdfstartlink   error.  According to , "this happens when hyperref is used under pdftex and a citation splits across a page boundary".  The given solution is to manual fix the citation to not split across the page boundary.  However, this workaround isn't feasible for me, as the documents are automatically generated on a server with no user interaction.  Is there any solution to the problem known, perhaps an experimental hyperref action or a patch to pdftex?  (Probably, one could use luatex to solve the problem, but for other reasons, luatex is not an option in this project.)  MWE:  \documentclass[%draft               ]{article} \usepackage{hyperref} \setlength{\textwidth}{3cm} \setlength{\textheight}{3cm}  \begin{document} Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna \href{http://www.tug.org/errors}{aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua.} \end{document} Why are 15 reputation points required to upvote? I think more reputation points should be required to add a new answer than to upvote an existing answer.  I don't continually watch for new questions, so usually when I find a question it has already been answered.  It seems bit inappropriate to answer an already-answered question in order to contribute to the conversation, but until you earn reputation, you can't upvote or comment; you can only add new answers, which prevents me from contributing at the moment as much as I would like to.  This seems backwards to me. If someone incorrectly upvotes a bad answer, the damage is minimal, as other users can down vote it and upvote the correct answers. On the other hand, an incorrect answer wastes the time of everyone who reads it.  So, IMHO, it should require more reputation points to add an answer than to upvote or comment on an existing answer.  I wouldn't say say that users should be prevented from answering unanswered questions until they have x reputation points, as that might prevent users who have answers from providing them, but perhaps it should be required if the question is already answered, to discourage users from reiterating previously given answers.  What do you think? How can we prove that     $$\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{R}{k}\binom{M}{n-k}=\binom{R+M}{n}?$$   (Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 8, Ch 1, A First Course in Probability, 8th ed by Sheldon Ross. I'm writing my final report in LaTeX for my bachelor's degree. I'm aiming at having a document similar to the .doc template used normally.   I want to have my customs headers and footers applied on pages when I'm starting a new chapter.  I'm using documentclass report with fancyhdr and lastpage packages.  My headers are defined like this:  \lhead{\myTitle} \rhead{\today} \cfoot{\thepage\ of \pageref{LastPage}}   My chapters are created using standard \chapter{title} macro.  On pages with new chapters, the only headers/footers I see is the standard page number at the bottom.  What should I do?  EDIT: I've finally gone with Peter Breitfeld's solution. I'Ve gone a step further and created my own chapter command:  \newcommand{\myChapter}[1]{     \chapter{#1}     \thispagestyle{fancy} }   Thanks for the help! Is there a way to force the Nikon D40's rear LCD panel to stay off? Is there an off/disable control anywhere? I realize that the INFO button toggles it off, but it comes right back on as soon as you tap the shutter, and that it a problem in low light situations where the LCD keeps blasting me in the eye. The search parameter isanswered ignores acceptances The SE definition of "answered" question is: has an answer that is either accepted or has positive score. But the search parameter isanswered appears to ignore the "accepted" clause: when set to "no" it still returns questions with an accepted answer, as long as it has 0 score.    to reproduce the bug (unless meta effect kicks in and the answers get upvotes).     By the way, it seems that isanswered works only when is:question is present, but I'm not complaining about that... yet.   Also, this parameter is not listed on the , but I'm not complaining about that either... yet. How can one use multi threading in PHP applications Is there a realistic way of implementing a multi-threaded model in PHP whether truly, or just simulating it. Some time back it was suggested that you could force the operating system to load another instance of the PHP executable and handle other simultaneous processes.  The problem with this is that when the PHP code finished executing the PHP instance remains in memory because there is no way to kill it from within PHP.  So if you are simulating several threads you can imagine whats going to happen.  So I am still looking for a way multi-threading can be done or simulated effectively from within PHP. Any ideas? Is it possible to retrieve a previous un-evaluated, un-normalized input?