UK outline basemap
UK coastline shapefile?
Generating a list of numbers that are not multiples of 4 How to make `man` work for shell builtin commands and keywords? If an email message contains an email address in the body, Gmail automatically converts it into a mailto: link, which is helpful.  And many times each day I've enjoyed being able to right-click a mailto: link in an email (within Gmail) and then click "Copy email address" in the context menu.  Then I can paste that email address into a program (such as when I want to search a database).  However, within the past month or so, I've noticed that I can't right-click and click "Copy email address" without Gmail then popping open a "New Message" panel and changing my current URL to have ?compose=new at the end.  I wonder if it's related to .  How can I disable it?  I'm tried of having to click the "Discard draft" trash can button so many times throughout the day. Is there a rule of thumb for objective questions asked out of curiosity? Is there a particle called a "tachyon" that can travel faster than light?  If so, would Einstein's relativity be wrong?  According to Einstein no particle can travel faster than light. /testfor for item enchantment What I have now is:  /testfor @a {SelectedItemSlot:0,Inventory:[{Slot:0b,id:"diamond_pickaxe"}]}   How can I use the /testfor command to test a specific slot for a specific item that is enchanted? How can I figure out what's slowly eating my HD space? Every few days I get notices on my MacBook that it's running or run out of hard drive space. Curiously, restarting the computer will enable me to recover gigabytes of space (this past time, it was able to recover about 2.2GB). However, I can't identify anything in my personal activity that consumed that space.  It's possible that it's a rogue iTunes podcast or a huge software update that my Mac is automatically downloading - would either of these reclaim the space upon a restart?  One possibility that I can think of is that FileVault has some sort of disk leak, allocating but not freeing files. Does this make sense? Is there a tool that I can run to determine where this space is going? Assuming it is FileVault, should I try to disable it? What's the best way to turn of FileVault on a nearly full computer? "Authoring" versus "Writing" In my area of work the word author as a verb has become quite common. However, it seems to have a subtly different meaning than plain vanilla write. For example, one does not write software unit tests; one authors them.  Can anyone offer a clear distinction between the two words? Has author as a verb become a common usage outside of the field of computer software? Effect of switching response and explanatory variable in simple linear regression Let's say that there exists some "true" relationship between $y$ and $x$ such that $y = ax + b + \epsilon$, where $a$ and $b$ are constants and $\epsilon$ is i.i.d normal noise. When I randomly generate data from that R code: x &lt;- 1:100; y &lt;- ax + b + rnorm(length(x)) and then fit a model like y ~ x, I obviously get reasonably good estimates for $a$ and $b$.  If I switch the role of the variables as in (x ~ y), however, and then rewrite the result for $y$ to be a function of $x$, the resulting slope is always steeper (either more negative or more positive) than that estimated by the y ~ x regression. I'm trying to understand exactly why that is and would appreciate it if anyone could give me an intuition as to what's going on there. How to remove "phone style" Gnome swipe to unlock Prove that if $n \in \mathbb{N}$, then $$\sum_{d|n}{(d(n))^3}=(\sum_{d|n}{d(n)})^2$$ where $d(n)$ is the divisor function. I have know only information is $d(n)=\sum_{d|n}{1}$. Why multiplicative group $\mathbb{Z}_n^*$ is not cyclic for $n = 2^k$ and $k \ge 3$ C# Change A Button's Background Color Is it possible to use a MacBook Pro as a second monitor for my iMac? Both of them have a Thunderbolt port.  If not, is there any other way? Are black holes in a sense transparent? Meaning, they don't 'hide' any stars that happen to be 'behind' them?  A regular object obviously blocks a point source of light emanating from 'behind' it. Meaning it creates an area of space photons cannot get to us from. But a massive object curves space, and so via gravitational lensing we can sometimes see distant stars that are 'behind' other stars (by behind I mean that if the star in the middle would suddenly vanish, the trajectory of photons traveling from the distant star to Earth would have passed through the volume now occupied by the middle star).  My thinking, is that black holes curve space so much, that from ANY source of light outside it, light has a trajectory to reach us on Earth (assuming of course no other object blocks it on its way).  The reasoning for this is: Suppose we draw the straight line between us and the light source (as if the black hole wasn't there at all). Photons from our light source crossing the event horizon would obviously 'fall' inside. A photon in theory traveling exactly tangent to the event horizon would in a sense go 'into orbit' around the black hole (obviously there is no such thing, because the black hole isn't perfectly spherical, and there are quantum effects and so forth. But I'm focusing on the geometry), crossing our straight line exactly at the intersection of our line and the event horizon. Any photon passing near the event horizon, but a bit farther, would follow a curve that intersects our line a little farther from the event horizon. Continuing this, there would be at last be a photon that would exactly curve our way. Should academic papers necessarily carry a sober tone? I was reading  titled "Optimal Symmetric Rendezvous Search on Three Locations." While talking about the history of search problems, the author mentions the following anecdote in passing.     In 2007 a letter writer to the Guardian newspaper queried, “I lost my wife in the crowd at Glastonbury (a music festival). What is the best strategy for finding her?” A reader replied, “Start talking to an attractive woman. Your wife   will reappear almost immediately.”   While I found it quite amusing to read this, I do not often come across papers with such witticisms. Is there an unwritten rule about the tone of sobriety that is considered appropriate in academic papers? Are jokes or anecdotes fine as long as they do not appear forced? How to prove that $\mathbb{Q}$ ( the rationals) is a countable set I want to prove that $\mathbb{Q}$ is countable. So basically, I could find a bijection from $\mathbb{Q}$ to $\mathbb{N}$. But I have also recently proved that $\mathbb{Z}$ is countable, so is it equivalent to find a bijection from $\mathbb{Q}$ to $\mathbb{Z}$? Prove that the additive groups of $\Bbb Z$ and $\Bbb Q$ are not isomorphic.    It is hard to create a map that will show homomorphism. at least one element fixed by all the group $G$ is a p-group and $S$ is a set that $G$ acts on. p does not divide $|S|$. Why is there at least one element $a\in S$ such that $|O(a)|=1$, or in other words, $G_a=G$?  I tried to ask this question yesterday but did not word it right, so the one who helped me claim that this part is clearly true and I really do not understand why, and I couldn't get a straight answer for the past day.   Any of you are welcome to vote to delete this question (after some discussion with me about the problem I hope), but I just really want to know why it is "clearly true, because I still couldn't reason it right. I have a simular issue to the question asked in :  I have tried the solution provided by Jake. This makes that my picture fails to resize (scale) as i intend.  Whether i give Set scale=0.4 or Set scale=0.8 The size of the  picture remains the same  This is the code i use:  \begin{figure}[ht!] \centering \begin{tikzpicture}[Set scale=0.4, every node/.append style={transform shape},] % STYLES \tikzstyle{every node}=[rectangle,rounded corners, minimum width=100pt,     align=center,node distance=3cm,fill=black!10,inner sep=5pt,text width=3cm,minimum height=1.75cm,&gt;=stealth,text badly centered] % Draw forces \node [force, above of=rivalry] (top) {Firm strategy, structure and rivalry}; \node [force, left=1cm of rivalry] (left) {Factor conditions}; \node [force, right=1cm of rivalry] (right) {Demand Conditions}; \node [force, below of=rivalry] (bottom) {Related and Supporting industries}; %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % Draw the links between forces \path[&lt;-&gt;,thick]  (left) edge (right) (left) edge (top) (left) edge (bottom) (top) edge (right) (bottom) edge (right); \path[&lt;-&gt;,thick]  (bottom) edge (top); \end{tikzpicture} \caption{Porter's Diamond source:~\cite{Porter:1980}}% \label{fig:diamond}  \end{figure}