Color code sharepoint Online calendar view
color code in SharePoint calendar
How should an educational institute woo good faculty? What steps must an educational institution wanting to recruit good faculty take? There is a cycle in the academia:    Good doctorates from top universities invariably join other top universities as faculty members.  Good students aspire to study in top universities under excellent faculty members.   Suppose a new educational institution or department springs up and desires to set up a top-quality group, how does it break into this cycle? I suppose this could take some years, but is money-power the only thing that could be wielded by the institute to achieve its end? A Jamaican committed marriage fraud about 30 years ago by marrying a US citizen in a marriage where the groom was paid a certain amount of money to marry her. The groom got in legal trouble for an unrelated matter, and the marriage fraud was discovered and the family friend was deported back to Jamaica. She no longer has any paperwork involved with the deportation and she can’t remember any of the details. I do not know if she simply agreed to return to Jamica when the fraud was discovered, or if she made any attempts to mount any type of legal defense in the case. I do know that she was cooperative with the immigration authorities and that they did not have to come looking for her. She would like to come the USA for a two-week visit. The main purpose of the visit is for her to visit a friend (US citizen) who is terminally ill.  I have been looking at 8 U.S.C. 1182 and from my reading of it, it would seem that she would not be admissible to the US because of the previous immigration fraud. My understanding is based on the section that says:     In general.-Any alien who, by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United States or other benefit provided under this Act is inadmissible.   What’s not clear to me is if this means that she would be inadmissible permanently or if this would be subject to the 10 year limit.  Can anyone help provide some clarity on this?  If the ban is not permanent are there any tips to being able to increase her chances of being able to get a visa.  She intends to honestly answer all questions during her application process for a visa. Webform redirect I'd like to do something pretty straightforward: After user fills out a , I'd like a button that simply redirects them to a URL (in this case it's to a demo sandbox). Of course I'd want the user to fill in their info to capture for lead-generation purposes. My  is set up correctly in that it correctly captures all the user fields and submits them to me via email. However, upon completion "click" I'd like to have the user redirected to a determined internal URL www.mysite.com/foo  I can't figure out how this is done with the vanilla webform settings. Am I missing something obvious? Do there Exist Proper Classes that aren't "Too Big" Some proper classes are "too big" to be a set in the sense that they have a subclass that can be put in bijection with $\alpha$ for every cardinal $\alpha$. It is implied in  post that every proper class is "too big" to be a set in this sense, however I have been unable to prove it. It's true if every two proper classes are in bijection, but it's consistent with ZFC for there to be a pair of non-bijective classes.  So, is the following true in ZFC:     For all proper classes, $C$, and $\alpha\in\mathbf{Card}$, $\exists S\subset C$ such that $|S|=\alpha$?   If not, is there something reasonable similar that preserves the intuition about classes that are "too big to be sets"? \overbrace and \underbrace with square bracket Web sites can contain JPEG, GIF,PNG, SVG format graphics. Which ones should be used, and when? A thin-walled container of mass $m$ floats vertically at the separation surface of the two liquids of density $ρ_1$ and $ρ_2$  . The whole mass of the container is concentrated in the part of height $h$.  The question is to determine the immersion depth $h'$of the container in the lower liquid if the bottom of the container has a thickness $h$ and an area $S$ and if the container itself is filled with the liquid of density $ρ_1$.    I applied the fundamental principle of the statics on the container  $Balance$ $Sheet$:  The weight of the container ($-mg$)  The buoyancy force applied by the fluid with density $ρ_2$ ($ρ_2gSh$)  The weight of the fluid with density  $ρ_1$  (-$ρ_2gSh'$)  I summed up the forces and set them to zero and find my $h'$  but then  realised that the fluid with density  $ρ_1$  applied also a buoyoncy force on the top of the container , and the fluid with density  $ρ_2$  applied a buoyoncy force on the other fluid.  Where's the problem ? Calculating optimal number of bins in a histogram I'm interested in finding as optimal of a method as I can for determining how many bins I should use in a histogram. My data should range from 30 to 350 objects at most, and in particular I'm trying to apply thresholding (like Otsu's method) where "good" objects, which I should have fewer of and should be more spread out, are separated from "bad" objects, which should be more dense in value. A concrete value would have a score of 1-10 for each object. I'd had 5-10 objects with scores 6-10, and 20-25 objects with scores 1-4. I'd like to find a histogram binning pattern that generally allows something like Otsu's method to threshold off the low scoring objects. However, in the implementation of Otsu's I've seen, the bin size was 256, and often I have many fewer data points that 256, which to me suggests that 256 is not a good bin number. With so few data, what approaches should I take to calculating the number of bins to use? PhD in Europe without scholarship from non-European homeland I tried to find a topic here on this (possible problem) but I didn't.   I reported it at  but Tim Hoffmann pointed me that it is not a problem of editor. After tested with nano and pdflatex I'm posting here.  The minimal code produces errors. OK, we can solve it using \\{}.   But is this a problem with TeXlive 2014 or there are some good reasons to have that behavior.  \documentclass{report} \begin{document} test\\ [foo]  test\linebreak [foo]  test\newline [foo] \end{document}      ! Missing number, treated as zero.                        f l.3 test\ [foo] I have a TikZ picture with a node containing a minipage with an itemize environment; each item is a hyperref to other sections of the document.   When scaling the image (for example with \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.7, transform shape] I've a strange behavior: links in itemize are not in the right place: they present a somewhat vertical offset, as if they don't scale as the rest of image.   Here the MWE:  \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage[pdftex]{hyperref} \begin{document}  Here something interesting\label{text:interesting-one} \newpage  Here something interesting, too\label{text:interesting-two} \newpage  and here there are very very interesting stuff\label{text:interesting-three} \newpage  \newpage Now the problem: links rectangles have some offset, making links unusable in case of long itemize  \begin{figure}[htb] \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.7, transform shape] \node at (0,0) (mynode) { \begin{minipage}{4cm} \begin{itemize} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-one]{First link} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-two]{Second link} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-three]{Third link} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-one]{First link again} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-two]{Second link again} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-three]{Third link again} \end{itemize} \end{minipage} }; \end{tikzpicture} \end{figure} \end{document}   And here a snapshot of the problem    Note: This is evident using the default settings of hyperref package, which draws the red rectangle around links, but it took me some time to found it when only the text is coloured, i.e. when using \usepackage[linkcolor=blue,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} Why the statement "there exist at least one bound state for negative/attractive potential" doesn't hold for 3D case? Previously I thought this is a universal theorem, for one can prove it in the one dimensional case using variational principal.   However, today I'm doing a homework considering a potential like this:$$V(r)=-V_0\quad(r&lt;a)$$$$ V(r)=0\quad(r&gt;a)$$ and found that there is no bound state when $V_0a^2&lt;\pi^2\hbar^2/8m$.  So what's the condition that we have at least one bound state for 3D and 2D? I know that who is used when asking about a subject (Who is at the door?) and whom is used when asking about an object (By whom was the door opened?). How do you determine which one to use when the object becomes the subject of another clause?   For example, take the sentence:      I gave the prize to ____ deserved it most.   Would it be whomever because it's the object of "gave," or would it be whoever because it's the subject of "deserved"? Is their a hard-and-fast rule to rely on in situations like this? $(S^1 \times [0,1])/\sim$ homeomorphic to unit disk $ D^2$ Let $\sim$ be the equivalence relation on $S_1 \times I$ given by $(x,t)\sim(y,s)$ if and only if $xt=ys$ where $I=[0,1]$  How do I prove that $(S_1 \times I)/\sim$ is homeomorphic to the unit disk $D^2$ with the induced topology? How to calculate the difference between two dates using PHP? I have two dates of the form:  Start Date: 2007-03-24  End Date: 2009-06-26   Now I need to find the difference between these two in the following form:  2 years, 3 months and 2 days   How can I do this in PHP? Will higher temperatures damage a computer over time, even when not reaching max? Lubuntu Installer Giving Error after Partition creation "YOUR SYSTEM MAY OR MAY NOT BOOT " I was replacing my Ubuntu 18.04 with Lubuntu 20.04. I wanted to keep my /home partition same. After creating /root , swap and changing mount point for /home partition the installer gave a warning that /boot/efi partition is not created Lubuntu 20.04 needs /boot/efi partition to boot. Please create a FAT32 partition and mount it as /boot/efi and enable flag esp. Then I created the /boot/efi  partition but there was no esp flag(s). I had installed Ubuntu 18.04 alongside windows10. What should I do now? Let $M,N$ be $n \times n$ square matrices over an algebraically closed field with the properties that the trace of both matrices coincides along with all powers of the matrix. More specifically, suppose that $\mathrm{Tr}(M^k) = \mathrm{Tr}(N^k)$ for all $1\leq k \leq n$. The following questions about eigenvalues is then natural and I was thinking it would be an application of Cayley-Hamilton but I am having trouble writing out a proof.  How do we show that $M$ and $N$ have the same eigenvalues?  Added (because this question is now target of many duplicates, it should state its hypotheses properly). Assume that all the mentioned values of $k$ are nonzero in the field considered; in other words either the field is of characteristic $0$, or else its prime characteristic $p$ satisfies $p&gt;n$. Should a retrieval method return 'null' or throw an exception when it can't produce the return value? Detailed Bathymetric/Bathymetry contour data (0-200M)