Export/Import Screen Layouts
How would I import/export Blender's preferences?
Why are my textures pink? What's is the origin of Orbital Angular Momentum of electrons in atoms? Consider the Hydrogen 1s electron. We know that, in the quantum picture, the electron isn't orbiting or rotating at all, rather we simply state that the electron is spread over the entire space with the probability of finding it being maximum a radial distance $R$ (=Bohr radius) away from the nucleus. This helps explain why the electron does not radiate EM radiation while in the atom.  But, with this understanding, I do not understand the source of the orbital angular momentum. Is it intrinsic like the spin? better Curve/Text to Mesh generation? , to correct a misspelled library enum in an answer. Since the edit was only one character, I also had to add a superfluous sentence to get over the character limit required to edit a post.  I've hit this problem before in other edits, always in code snippets. Since the edit limit exists to prevent trivial edits, and since there are many cases where one character code edits are not trivial (= to == etc), would it make sense to have a lower edit minimum inside code snippets? Proving that $A_n$ is the only proper nontrivial normal subgroup of $S_n$, $n\geq 5$ There is a famous Theorem telling that:  For $n≥5$, $A_n$ is the only proper nontrivial normal subgroup of $S_n$.  For the proof, we firstly start with assuming a subgroup of $S_n$ which $1≠N⊲S_n$. We proceed until at the last part of proof's body, we assume $N∩A_n=\{1\}$. This assumption should be meet a contradiction with normality of $N$ in $S_n$. There; we get $N=\{1,\pi $} in which $\pi$ is an odd permutation of order $2$. Now for meeting desire inconsistency, I have two approaches:  (a) Since every normal subgroup, having two elements, lies in the center of $G$ so, our $N⊆ Z(S_n)=\{1\}$ for $n≥5$ and then $N=\{1\}$.  (b) Clearly, $1≠N$ acting on set $\Omega=\{1,2,...,n\}$ is intransitive wherein $|\Omega|≥5$ and according to the following Proposition $S_n$ would be imprimitive.  Proposition 7.1: If the transitive group $G$ contains an intransitive normal subgroup different from $1$, then $G$ is imprimitive (Finite Permutation Groups by H.Wielandt).  May I ask if the second approach is valid? I am fond of knowing new approach if exists. Thanks. i have created a schedulable class which has to trigger a batch job. The run method for the batch class will get list of data to process from a webservice callout. Now, i got the exception below. Any suggestions please.     System.CalloutException: Callout from scheduled Apex not supported.   global class scheduledDeltaBatchable implements Schedulable {    global void execute(SchedulableContext sc) {     ID batchprocessid = BatchUpsertSAPCustomerMasterBPSync.run(SAPServices.GetSAPCustomerMasterBPSync('Delta'));    } } In this case what is correct?        Keep Tom and I updated.      or         Keep Tom and me updated.      I understand that me is an object pronoun. And therefore I feel the second option is correct.  Especially, because I would say "Keep him updated" and also "Keep me updated". Instead of "Keep he updated" or "Keep I updated". But something about saying "Keep him and me updated" feels wrong.  However I am not sure, because several people have told me that in this case I is the correct option because it is being used in conjunction with a name (Tom) and not a pronoun. Is that correct? Difficulty in finding a counterexample Function with same name but different signature in derived class I have a function with the same name, but with different signature in a base and derived classes. When I am trying to use the base class's function in another class that inherits from the derived, I receive an error. See the following code:  class A {     public:     void foo(string s){}; };  class B : public A {     public:     int foo(int i){}; };  class C : public B {     public:     void bar()     {         string s;         foo(s);     } };   I receive the following error from the gcc compiler:  In member function `void C::bar()': no matching function for call to `C::foo(std::string&amp;)' candidates are: int B::foo(int)   If I remove int foo(int i){}; from class B, or if I rename it from foo1, everything works fine.   What's the problem with this? How do people who do not speak Indian English "prepone" things? showing that a group of order 45 is abelian If votes works differently on meta sites how does that of accepting answers work? In the faq of meta sites you can read something like the following:     Voting here works a bit differently   from other Stack Exchange sites. On   Meta Stack Overflow, voting is used to   express agreement or disagreement, not   to point out a lack of quality or   helpfulness. Please don't be concerned   if you receive downvotes – members of   the community may simply disagree with   your bug, feature request, support   issue, or the nature of the   discussion.   My question is: If votes works differently on meta sites how does that of accepting answers work?  Take for instance a question on a meta site that is meant for the community to discuss some issue. What does it mean if the question is accepted? Accepting an answer is up to the author of the question so it cannot be a sign of what answer the community concludes from the discussion. It could mean that the discussion is over but that should be up to the community and not the author of the question. Is it so that accepting an answer for a discussion question on a meta site does not have a particular function? Subject-Verb Agreement Making separate Python installation that can call ArcPy? I see a lot of Q&amp;As asking how you can create a separate Python installation (e.g. the Anaconda or Python XY distribution) that can use arcpy, while not 'breaking' the original ArcGIS python installation.  I had this same problem, and I think I have found a 'universal' solution. So far we have done this on about 8 computers at work and it all works fine.   How to install a separate Python distribution that can use ArcGIS? Getting "Authentication is required" when trying to access the Play Store Over the past week, whenever I try  to open the Play Store/Market app on my phone, the app thinks for a while and then displays this error message:     Authentication is required. You need to sign into your Google Account.   But I am indeed signed into my Google account, as seen in other Google applications running on the phone, and as seen if I open the menu in the Market app and click the "Accounts" button.  I suspect this might be related to the fact that over the past few months I've had two different Google accounts synced to this device, and I have recently removed one of them from the phone. No other Google application has had any problems with removing one account.  Does anyone know how I can solve this issue? I can still install applications by using the market website (now "Google Play"), but this is still a big inconvenience. I also think I stopped getting updates. Multiple permanents entering the battlefield simultaneously and “Enter the Battlefield” effects Proving that, $|f'(x)-f'(y)|\le k|x-y| \implies (f'(x))^2< 2 kf(x) $ "Access is denied" JavaScript error when trying to access the document object of a programmatically-created  (IE-only) Prove by induction that for all $n \geq 3$: $n^{n+1} > (n+1)^n$ I am currently helping a friend of mine with his preperations for his next exam. A big topic of the exam will be induction, thus I told him he should practice this a lot. As at the beginning he had no idea how induction worked, I showed him some typical examples.  Now he showed me an exercise he was having trouble with, which states that one should prove $$n^{n+1} &gt; (n+1)^n$$  for all $n \geq 3$. I have to admit that I too have trouble showing this inequality, as in all of my attempts, my lower bound is too low. Also, I have not yet figured out, how one gets the $(n+2)^{n+1}$, primarely the number $2$ is a problem. I think this might be solved using the binomial theorem, however, I don't think they have already seen the binomial theorem in school.  Is there an easy method to show this inequality by induction not using the binomial theorem? If no: How can one show it using the binomial theorem?  Thanks for answers in advance. A user has asked  which did not receive much attention, and thus the user deleted the post. After some time, the user asked the  (with just slight changes to the title and a tag change), so that it could receive a bit more attention. The strange thing is that the question was not downvoted or poorly written, and yet the user deleted the original post. Now, since the original question was deleted, I could not mark the new one as a duplicate (it threw an error). My question is, how do we handle such questions? Just let them be as such or let the user know about it or is there another way to handle such situations?