How to prevent Google from showing sub domain name as title in search result?
My website title shows up slightly different from what's in my title tag, only in Google search
Is there a way to force the Nikon D40's rear LCD panel to stay off? Is there an off/disable control anywhere? I realize that the INFO button toggles it off, but it comes right back on as soon as you tap the shutter, and that it a problem in low light situations where the LCD keeps blasting me in the eye. Is there a Raster Equivalent of the Split tool? Show $\lim_{n \to \infty} n^{-1} E \left( \frac{1}{X}1_{[X>n^{-1}]} \right) =0$ Suppose $X$ is a non-negative random variable satisfying  \begin{align*} P[0 \le X &lt; \infty ]=1. \end{align*} Show   a)  \begin{align*} \lim_{n \to \infty} n E \left( \frac{1}{X}1_{[X&gt;n]} \right) =0 \end{align*} b)  \begin{align*} \lim_{n \to \infty} n^{-1} E \left( \frac{1}{X}1_{[X&gt;n^{-1}]} \right) =0 \end{align*}  What I did  I showed part a) already here is the proof:  \begin{align*} n E \left( \frac{1}{X}1_{[X&gt;n]} \right) \le n E \left( \frac{1}{n}1_{[X&gt;n]} \right)=n\cdot\frac{1}{n}P[X&gt;n]=P[X&gt;n] \end{align*} So $\lim_{n \to \infty} n E \left( \frac{1}{X}1_{[X&gt;n]} \right) \le \lim_{n \to \infty} P[X&gt;n]=0$.  What about part b)? The same techniques no longer works.  I was thinking that  \begin{align*} \lim_{n \to \infty} n E \left( \frac{1}{X}1_{[X&gt;n]} \right) \le \lim_{n \to \infty} n E \left( \frac{1}{X} \right) \le 0 \end{align*} but I am not sure that $E \left( \frac{1}{X} \right) &lt; \infty$ Non in front of hyphenated adjective Why does chmod +w not give write permission to other(o) When I run chmod +w filename it doesn't give write permission to other, it just gives write permission to user and group.  After executing this command  chmod +w testfile.txt   running ls -l testfile.txt prints  -rw-rw-r-- 1 ravi ravi 20 Mar 10 18:09 testfile.txt   but in case of +r and +x it works properly.  I don't want to use chmod ugo+w filename. Can I live in the UK for a long time through repeat visits? I had recently entered the UK without a visa to be with my partner, from 21 July 2016 until 16 December 2016. I hope to return on the 9th of January. We don't meet the income requirement for a Spouse visa. I recently applied to university, and got in, and was intending to return to the UK on a student visa, but my university did not tell me about maintenance fees and my loan wasn't large enough to cover it all, so my visa would have been denied.  Now, I am hoping to attend university in the next semester, and therefore return to the US to apply for that visa. Do you think that if I try to return to the UK without a visa, I will be turned away?  I won't be working or studying during this time, however, I'm afraid that they'll consider it living in the UK illegally; I don't have a criminal record or anything like that. How to return only the Date from a SQL Server DateTime datatype SELECT GETDATE()   Returns: 2008-09-22 15:24:13.790  I want that date part without the time part: 2008-09-22 00:00:00.000  How can I get that? How do you prevent a user from posting data multiple times on a website OS X computer name not matching what shows on terminal My computer name in System Preferences &gt; Sharing is set to &quot;archos&quot;, but is showing as &quot;iphone&quot; on Terminal. It just started doing this after I loaded Xcode for doing iPhone development: Last login: Mon Nov  7 14:46:55 on ttys001 iphone:~ travis$   Any ideas what could be causing this? I have a simple question regarding "conditional probability" and "Likelihood". (I have already surveyed this question  but to no avail.)  It starts from the Wikipedia . They say this:     The likelihood of a set of parameter values, $\theta$, given   outcomes $x$, is equal to the probability of those observed outcomes   given those parameter values, that is      $$\mathcal{L}(\theta \mid x) = P(x \mid \theta)$$   Great! So in English, I read this as: "The likelihood of parameters equaling theta, given data X = x, (the left-hand-side), is equal to the probability of the data X being equal to x, given that the parameters are equal to theta". (Bold is mine for emphasis).  However, no less than 3 lines later on the same page, the Wikipedia entry then goes on to say:     Let $X$ be a random variable with a discrete probability distribution   $p$ depending on a parameter $\theta$. Then the function      $$\mathcal{L}(\theta \mid x) = p_\theta (x) = P_\theta (X=x), \, $$      considered as a function of $\theta$, is called the likelihood   function (of $\theta$, given the outcome $x$ of the random variable   $X$). Sometimes the probability of the value $x$ of $X$ for the   parameter value $\theta$ is written as $P(X=x\mid\theta)$; often   written as $P(X=x;\theta)$ to emphasize that this differs from   $\mathcal{L}(\theta \mid x) $ which is not a conditional probability,   because $\theta$ is a parameter and not a random variable.   (Bold is mine for emphasis). So, in the first quote, we are literally told about a conditional probability of $P(x\mid\theta)$, but immediately afterwards, we are told that this is actually NOT a conditional probability, and should be in fact written as $P(X = x; \theta)$?   So, which one is is? Does the likelihood actually connote a conditional probability ala the first quote? Or does it connote a simple probability ala the second quote?  EDIT:  Based on all the helpful and insightful answers I have received thus far, I have summarized my question - and my understanding thus far as so:    In English, we say that: "The likelihood is a function of parameters, GIVEN the observed data." In math, we write it as: $L(\mathbf{\Theta}= \theta \mid \mathbf{X}=x)$. The likelihood is not a probability.  The likelihood is not a probability distribution.  The likelihood is not a probability mass. The likelihood is however, in English: "A product of probability distributions, (continuous case), or a product of probability masses, (discrete case), at where $\mathbf{X} = x$, and parameterized by $\mathbf{\Theta}= \theta$." In math, we then write it as such: $L(\mathbf{\Theta}= \theta \mid \mathbf{X}=x) = f(\mathbf{X}=x ; \mathbf{\Theta}= \theta) $ (continuous case, where $f$ is a PDF), and as $L(\mathbf{\Theta}= \theta \mid \mathbf{X}=x) = P(\mathbf{X}=x ; \mathbf{\Theta}= \theta) $ (discrete case, where $P$ is a probability mass). The takeaway here is that at no point here whatsoever is a conditional probability coming into play at all.  In Bayes theorem, we have: $P(\mathbf{\Theta}= \theta \mid \mathbf{X}=x) = \frac{P(\mathbf{X}=x \mid \mathbf{\Theta}= \theta) \ P(\mathbf{\Theta}= \theta)}{P(\mathbf{X}=x)}$. Colloquially, we are told that "$P(\mathbf{X}=x \mid  \mathbf{\Theta}= \theta)$ is a likelihood", however, this is not true, since $\mathbf{\Theta}$ might be an actual random variable. Therefore, what we can correctly say however, is that this term $P(\mathbf{X}=x \mid \mathbf{\Theta}= \theta)$ is simply "similar" to a likelihood. (?) [On this I am not sure.]   EDIT II:  Based on @amoebas answer, I have drawn his last comment. I think it's quite elucidating, and I think it clears up the main contention I was having. (Comments on the image).    EDIT III:   I extended @amoebas comments to the Bayesian case just now as well: How to find the determinant of this $3 \times 3$ Hankel matrix? Today, at my linear algebra exam, there was this question that I couldn't solve.   Prove that $$\det \begin{bmatrix}  n^{2} &amp; (n+1)^{2} &amp;(n+2)^{2} \\  (n+1)^{2} &amp;(n+2)^{2}  &amp; (n+3)^{2}\\  (n+2)^{2} &amp; (n+3)^{2} &amp; (n+4)^{2} \end{bmatrix} = -8$$   Clearly, calculating the determinant, with the matrix as it is, wasn't the right way. The calculations went on and on. But I couldn't think of any other way to solve it. Is there any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant? Are there any versions of t-SNE for streaming data? "He was telling me that he is going..." vs. "He told me that he is going..." I can clearly see that $\dfrac{n!}{n^n}\to 0$ when $n\to\infty$. But how do I know if the sum $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n!}{n^n}$$ is convergent or not? I know this might be basic, but thank you if anyone can help me. Blacklight CFL Bulb Effect? I have been searching everywhere, and I can't find an answer so I'm coming here!  I'm trying to create a CFL Blacklight bulb. I've attached a couple images below of what I've tried to make. I'd love to have an effect like this:    Does anyone know how to recreate this? It seems like the color is affected by time as the bulb heats up, eventually being all white-ish. That would be fine, too, but I can't even seem to get the lighting effect of the pink glow around it and whatnot. I can post pictures of my node setup if you need it, though I think I made it necessarily complicated.  Thanks in advance!  UPDATE: This is what I have now:   I want to adjust the colors, but that isn't the issue now... The way I made this is a glass spiral that acts as the bulb. Inside of that bulb (that has a glass-like shader) is a purple material that I made that mimics the phosphor coating blacklight light bulbs have to filter light. Then, a separate mesh spiral is inside of that, and it has the emission stuff on it.   As Duarte suggested, I used the node setup he had for my emission, but used a transparent node instead of glossy. Why isn't the emission light from inside my glass causing the glass to be glossy? If I put a point light in the scene, it looks glossy.   Thanks in advance! Compute the moment generating function of $Y = X_1X_2 + X_1X_3 + X_2X_3$ What is the best way to copy text to the clipboard (multi-browser)? I have tried: function copyToClipboard(text) {     if (window.clipboardData) { // Internet Explorer         window.clipboardData.setData(&quot;Text&quot;, text);     } else {         unsafeWindow.netscape.security.PrivilegeManager.enablePrivilege(&quot;UniversalXPConnect&quot;);         const clipboardHelper = Components.classes[&quot;@mozilla.org/widget/clipboardhelper;1&quot;].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIClipboardHelper);         clipboardHelper.copyString(text);     } }  But in Internet Explorer it gives a syntax error. In Firefox, it says unsafeWindow is not defined. A nice trick without using : Why does English spelling use silent letters? While studying I read about the principle of underdetermination of scientific theories. I made some researches online but I am more confused than before. I read about the Quine-Duhem holistic thesis, but I do not know if is the same as underdetermination. I don't know what I've done, but all of a sudden I am unable to compile any document which uses the geometry package. Minimal (non)-working example:     \documentclass[11pt]{article}      \usepackage{geometry}  \begin{document} test \end{document}   doesn't produce any output, and this is what I see in my error summary screen in TeXnicCenter:    The red arrow points to what seems to be the problem: something about the bundle "oberdiek" and its package "ifvtex" is causing pdflatex.exe (which, while I don't really know what it does, sounds pretty important) to "not be initialized". I , and it's relevance here is a mystery to me.  I've confirmed that all of my files without the geometry package compile just fine; however, that doesn't mean that the problem is with the geometry package - what seems more likely is that there is some hidden cause of the error, and geometry happens to be one way to induce that. By the way, I've tried compiling a document which includes the ifpdf and ifvtex packages separately, and they do just fine; it's only when I include the geometry package (which for some reason requires these ifpdf and ifvtex packages) that the error occurs.  I've tried the only things I can think of:   going into MiKTeX Package Manager (by the way I am using 2.8), and removing + reinstalling both geometry and oberdiek refreshing the file name database ("FNDB") deleting all automatically generated files, as well as simply starting over in a new document   So I'm stuck now. I've considered attempting to just get rid of all traces of MiKTeX and TeXnicCenter from my computer and starting over, but that seems a bit excessive - after all, the geometry package was working for me . I honestly am not sure what I did to cause this; I've spent today trying to make a better template file for myself, and so I've been trying out new packages, but if I'm not loading these new packages there shouldn't be any conflicts, right?   Actually, I've just now thought of something that I think I did between the last time it worked and now, so is a possible candidate for the cause: I had to install some package manually, as it wasn't available on MiKTeX, and so I created a folder and pointed MiKTeX to it (i.e. the second option ). The package didn't do what I wanted, so I deleted the folder and removed it from the list of folders I told MiKTeX to check. Perhaps it's still trying to reach it for some reason?