Disable creating new taxonomy terms in term reference field
How to Disable new terms (free tagging) with Taxonomies?
I created a test MVC sharepoint app succesfully in a solution. Now I need to integrate this into a main solution project.   But when I added a SharePoint MVC App into the solution and hit F5, I am getting following error:  Error occurred in deployment step 'Install app for SharePoint':  Failed to install app for SharePoint. Please see the output window for details.   Detailed stack trace:  CorrelationId: 50583239-71cb-4b07-8bcb-4bbc51a22631      ErrorDetail: There was a problem with activating the app web definition.      ErrorType: App      ErrorTypeName: App Related      ExceptionMessage: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: Exception from HRESULT: 0x81070964 ---&gt; System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: Exception from HRESULT: 0x81070964 at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.EnableModuleFromXml(String bstrSetupDirectory, String bstrFeatureDirectory, String bstrUrl, String bstrXML, Boolean fForceUnghost, ISPEnableModuleCallback pModuleContext) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.EnableModuleFromXml(String bstrSetupDirectory, String bstrFeatureDirectory, String bstrUrl, String bstrXML, Boolean fForceUnghost, ISPEnableModuleCallback pModuleContext) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPElementDefinitionCollection.ProvisionModules(SPFeaturePropertyCollection props, SPSite site, SPWeb web, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean fForce) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPElementDefinitionCollection.ProvisionElements(SPFeaturePropertyCollection props, SPWebApplication webapp, SPSite site, SPWeb web, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean fForce) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeature.Activate(SPSite siteParent, SPWeb webParent, SPFeaturePropertyCollection props, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean fForce) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeatureCollection.AddInternal(SPFeatureDefinition featdef, Version version, SPFeaturePropertyCollection properties, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean force, Boolean fMarkOnly) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeatureCollection.AddInternalWithName(Guid featureId, Int32 compatibilityLevel, String featureName, Version version, SPFeaturePropertyCollection properties, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean force, Boolean fMarkOnly, SPFeatureDefinitionScope featdefScope) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeatureCollection.AddInternal(Guid featureId, Version version, SPFeaturePropertyCollection properties, Boolean force, Boolean fMarkOnly, SPFeatureDefinitionScope featdefScope) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeatureCollection.Add(Guid featureId, Boolean force, SPFeatureDefinitionScope featdefScope) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPUserSolutionCollection.EnsureWebFeaturesActivated(SPUserSolution solution) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Packaging.SPUserCodeSolutionDeploymentGroup.ActivateSolution(SPWeb web, SPUserSolution solution) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Packaging.SPUserCodeSolutionDeploymentGroup.Deploy() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAppTask.DeployOperation() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Lifecycle.MonitoredTaskExecution.DoTask()      Source: AppWeb      SourceName: App Web Deployment   Can somebody shed a light on this issue? :) Reading the target of a .lnk file in Python? I'm trying to read the target file/directory of a shortcut (.lnk) file from Python. Is there a headache-free way to do it? The  is way over my head. I don't mind using Windows-only APIs.  My ultimate goal is to find the "(My) Videos" folder on Windows XP and Vista. On XP, by default, it's at %HOMEPATH%\My Documents\My Videos, and on Vista it's %HOMEPATH%\Videos. However, the user can relocate this folder. In the case, the %HOMEPATH%\Videos folder ceases to exists and is replaced by %HOMEPATH%\Videos.lnk which points to the new "My Videos" folder. And I want its absolute location. The Frobenius Coin Problem I am asked to prove that:       For integers $n, x,y &gt; 0$, where $x,y$ are relatively prime,        every $n \ge (x-1) (y-1)$ can be expressed as $xa + yb$, with nonnegative integers $a,b \ge0$.   How should I approach this? I have very limited knowledge in number theory. There's no need to  the  that have led to a lack of trust between  of  and . Suffice it to say that astoundingly they continue to assert that  and, instead of apologizing and reinstating Monica have demanded that she go through a process with no transparency, due process, or involvement from the community.   Has the time has come for Stack Exchange, Inc to spin off the community and all the data needed to keep the sites running to a separate non-profit, who would then in turn license the software from the company?  What's in it for the community?   The community can practice self determination for issues from as basic as the number of moderators they have to as fundamental as the policies they enforce. If the company development continues to be unresponsive to the community's needs, the community would be able to develop its own open source software that would meet its needs. They can find their own funding model instead of having ads imposed on them.   What's in it for the company?   Community actions will no longer reflect on the company. Interaction with the community as a customer may come more naturally to current leadership than the present paradigm. They don't have to worry about paying for the community's operating expenses. They can focus on doing one thing well. I'm writing a LINQ to SQL statement, and I'm after the standard syntax for a normal inner join with an ON clause in C#.  How do you represent the following in LINQ to SQL:  select DealerContact.* from Dealer  inner join DealerContact on Dealer.DealerID = DealerContact.DealerID My friend is buying a digital point-and-shoot camera, which he wants to use to click family pictures including a lot of pictures of their newborn son.  What camera qualities should he be looking for while buying? Earlier today I posted  which yielded a .  I'd like to attract attention to this answer in the hope that the answer will get upvoted, as a kind of reward for the quality of the answer.  Is there anything that I can do to achieve this? I have a bathroom door that is quite loud when operated. And when someone goes to the bathroom at night, it innevatibly wakes someone up (and baby room is just across from the bathroom!) there are 3 components of noise, and I was wondering if there is an alternative to fixing them:   door bangs against the jamb (this is fixed with simple foam bumpers) latch mechanism makes a loud CLUNK when door is pushed closed (I was able to dampen it just a bit by putting foam inside strike plate, but it is still quite loud) lock button also makes a CLUNK when the knob is turned and it is released (this can be battled by replacing with a mechanism that needs to be manually opened [twist instead of push] but it is less convenient, and I would prefer something that automatically unlocks)   Any suggestions as to a knob that has a dampening of the latch and lock button? I have only found one youtube video of my ideal handle, but there is no information on how it works, where to buy it, or anything else: Evaluating $\int_0^\infty \sin x^2\, dx$ with real methods? Just noticed a minor css issue on this question:    The related questions on the right hand side have some overlapping text in Chrome:        (This only applies to this very site, Meta Stack Exchange) I use a Windows 10 machine remotely at work. Both the local and remote machine are in the same ISP network (not same local network, but same ISP). I've been using it like that for almost a year now and I had never experienced absolutely any issues.  Until recently. I don't know if anything specific triggered this behavior, but I feel that it started happening after I upgraded the remote to W10 1903. I later upgraded the local one as well and I feel that it only made the problem worse (but I don't really have any data).  From time to time, the session will freeze - the image stops updating. However, what I type and mouse clicks are still being sent. No error message is shown whatsoever, the image simply freezes. To make it work again, I have to close and re-open the session. Everything that I had typed and/or clicked while it was frozen is there.  Is there any way I can debug this? Induction problem: "if the group has at least one player who is better than Messi, then all the members of the group are better than Messi" Philosophy is the mother of all science Prologue Running google search:  at the time of this post yields about 114,000 results, and while this Quora post:  puts forth the question to determine the truth of the matter, it does not address the historical, etymological, and philosophical import of the matter. This PhilSE Post:  clearly addresses theory, but does not address the historical aspect. The related question in Researchgate post:  seems to not provide a substantial answer either. Inquiry What is the  context in which the statement 'Philosophy is the mother of all science' or related ones began to recognize as a  the  relationship between philosophy and the advent of modern science under thinkers like ? That is to say, what historical and social consequences were responsible for seeing  somehow superior as a theory to the ? Epilogue The question is intended to determine the metaphilosophical insights of philosophers. For example, if Karl Popper used the phrase or one similar, did he appeal to previous philosophers for insight on that same relationship? See Also Derivation of Maxwell's equations from field tensor lagrangian I've started reading Peskin and Schroeder on my own time, and I'm a bit confused about how to obtain Maxwell's equations from the (source-free) lagrangian density $L = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$ (where $F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial^\nu A^\mu$ is the field tensor).  Substituting in for the definition of the field tensor yields $L = -\frac{1}{2}[(\partial_\mu A_\nu)(\partial^\mu A^\nu) - (\partial_\mu A_\nu)(\partial^\nu A^\mu)]$.  I know I should be using $A^\mu$ as the dynamical variable in the Euler-Lagrange equations, which become $\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_\mu} - \partial_\mu\frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu A_\nu)} = - \partial_\mu\frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu A_\nu)}$, but I'm confused about how to proceed from here.  I know I should end up with $\partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} = 0$, but I don't quite see why.  Since $\mu$ and $\nu$ are dummy indices, I should be able to change them: how do the indices in the lagrangian relate to the indices in the derivatives in the Euler-Lagrange equations? Layers with same coordinates not lining up I have a project where I have a few layers (State of Texas, cities, roads, etc.). They are all resaved and projected to NAD83 / UTM zone 14N EPSG: 26914. The project CRS is also NAD83 / UTM zone 14N EPSG: 26914 and on the fly projection is enabled. I added a text delimited file and cannot get them to line up. I checked the attribute table of the delimited file and the coordinates are correct. I cross-checked this with a point close to where a few of the points from the delimited file are and they are very close so in theory they should be lining up. I tried to save the delimited file and save it with the same projection and add the shp file back in and that did not work. Anyone have any ideas? I can't think of anything else to try. Matlab Recursion Loop Border on borderless pie chart, Illustrator CC I'm an Illustrator beginner, and I have just made pie chart. I removed the borders but I still end up with a 1 pixel wide border between the pieces of the pie whenever I export to PDF or AI. Please see the attached image (zoomed to make it easier to spot it).    The question is: How do I get rid of it? Get client IP address via third party web service Stop execution of Javascript function (client side) or tweak it What is aperture, and how does it affect my photographs? How does aperture affect my photographs?  Why should I care about the aperture with which a photo was taken?