Spring Security: Why .authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/api/v1/web/**").permitAll() is not working?
What is a NullPointerException, and how do I fix it?
Why is "cupboard" pronounced with a silent "p"? According to Google at least, the word "cupboard" originated in late Middle English as denoting a board that held cups. Since then, the word has evolved to mean a kind of cabinet.  My question is, given its origin and spelling, why do we pronounce "cupboard" with a silent "p"? Has the pronunciation simply evolved because "cup-board" is too awkward to say, or is there a deeper pronunciation rule that I'm not aware of? Let $ G $ be an abelian group of order 6.  Then $ G $ has one element of order 6.  And so, $ G $ is cyclic and isomorphic to $ \mathbb Z _6 $.  In general, It is not true that an abelian group of order $n$ has an element of order $n$.  However in the case of $n=6$, it is true. I'm wondering there is any rule of the case (for example, a rule of $n$ that makes an abelian group cyclic). Singular or Plural setting to a variable. PHP I find I always have trouble scaling the amount of time the eggs should be boiled, cooled, etc. for different-sized batches of hard-boiled eggs.  I've heard a variety of "folk lore"-type rules for how it should be done, but what's really the right way? Prove $f(x) = \sqrt x$ is uniformly continuous on $[0,\infty)$ I have seen a proof in   Below shows an alternative proof. Please correct me if im wrong.  Proof:  For any given $\varepsilon &gt;0$,  Let $\delta_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2}$, $\forall x,y \in [1,\infty)$ with $|x-y|&lt;\delta_1$  Since $|\sqrt x + \sqrt y|\geq2$  $$|\sqrt x - \sqrt y|  = \frac{|x-y|}{|\sqrt x+\sqrt y|} &lt; |x-y| &lt; \delta_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2}$$  Hence, $\sqrt x$ is uniformly continuous on $[1,\infty)$.  $\sqrt x$ is continuous on [0,1] , so $\sqrt x$ is uniformly continuous on [0,1].  So, there exist $\delta_2 &gt; 0$ such that $\forall x,y \in [0,1], |x-y|&lt;\delta_2$, $|\sqrt x -\sqrt y| &lt;\frac{\varepsilon}{2}$  Let $\delta = \min{(\delta_1,\delta_2)}$  $\forall x,y \in [0,\infty)$ with $|x-y|&lt;\delta$,  Case 1: $x,y \in [0,1]$ Proven above as $|x-y| &lt; \frac{\varepsilon}{2} &lt; \varepsilon$  Case 2: $x,y \in [1,\infty)$ Proven above as $|x-y| &lt; \frac{\varepsilon}{2} &lt; \varepsilon$  Case 3: $x \in [0,1] , y \in [1,\infty]$  $$|\sqrt x-\sqrt y| = |\sqrt x -1+1-\sqrt y| \leq |\sqrt x-1| + |\sqrt y -1| &lt; \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2}= \varepsilon$$  by applying case 1 and case 2. In the annual rep league, why isn't the difference between rep earned this year and total rep always the same? In the  here on Meta Stack Exchange, it shows that I've earned 9,876 rep this year, and 10,359 rep overall. (It's updated every day at 0:00 UTC, and I so far have earned 1 rep today, since an answer I downvoted a while ago was deleted.)  The difference between my total rep and the rep I earned this year is 483, which means 483 of the rep I've earned is rep I earned in 2017 or earlier. This amount normally never changes, though I can see some reasons why it might change, such as if rep is recalculated and something affects a rep event occurring in a previous year (e.g. a vote from last year was invalidated due to user deletion, a post I made at that time was deleted or undeleted, etc.)  This amount, 483, was a recent change; it used to be 461. Ordinarily, I'd chalk this up to a rep event from last year being recalculated, but I've gone through my full rep history and I can see nothing of the sort happening. On the other hand, on the same day that this number changed from 461 to 483,  was undeleted, recalculating my rep and giving me back 22 (which happens to equal 483-461). It therefore makes sense if that post was from a previous year. However, the post is from this year, so it doesn't make very much sense.  Is there a bug in the way yearly rep in the rep league is calculated, in that rep regained from an undeleted post made the same year is not re-added to the rep earned this year (while it is subtracted properly upon deletion)? Or is there some other event that occurred in the three weeks before 2018 that I had my account that caused this difference to change, that I'm not seeing, and the change being equal to that is just a coincidence? Error sending edittext in java server. See code Which site deals with career development questions for programmers? Is there any site in the network where career development questions about the programming profession can be asked ? I thought Programmer's was the site for it, but that doesn't appear to be the case. Cross tabulation of two categorical variables: recommended techniques Number of factors of a big number How to find the number of factors of $884466000$ without using a calculator? How to rank a million images with a crowdsourced sort `testl` eax against eax? I am trying to understand some assembly.  The assembly as follows, I am interested in the testl line:  000319df  8b4508        movl   0x08(%ebp), %eax   000319e2  8b4004        movl   0x04(%eax), %eax   000319e5  85c0          testl  %eax, %eax   000319e7  7407          je     0x000319f0     I am trying to understand that point of testl between %eax and %eax? I think the specifics of what this code isn't important, I am just trying to understand the test with itself - wouldn't the value always be true? We have a situation: someone saw the boy break the window. Can I make this passive sentence?     The boy was seen to break the window.   I use Murphy's Grammar and this structure is never discussed. "Much more easy" versus "much easier" How to do string formatting with placeholders in Java (like in Python)? As the question title suggests, how do I see that every left ideal of a square matrix ring over a field is principal? What is the variance of the weighted mixture of two gaussians? Inductive proof that ${2n\choose n}=\sum{n\choose i}^2.$ I would like to prove inductively that $${2n\choose n}=\sum_{i=0}^n{n\choose i}^2.$$  I know a couple of non-inductive proofs, but I can't do it this way. The inductive step eludes me. I tried naively things like $${2n+2\choose n+1}={2n+2\over n+1}{2n+1\choose n}=2\cdot {2n+1\over n+1}{2n\choose n},$$  But I don't think it can lead me anywhere. I would like the proof to be as simple as possible. I am trying to perform stepwise regression for variable selection in R.  In matlab, the stepwisefit function is able to work in n &lt; p problems. Trying to use step() for such problems i get the error message AIC is -infinity for this model, so 'step' cannot proceed. Is there a way to modify parameters so i can use step function? Rotate a long bar in space and get close to (or even beyond) the speed of light $c$