SEO: One domain for all languages or domain per language
How should I structure my URLs for both SEO and localization?
How do I set Windows to boot as the default in the boot loader? How do I set the bootloader so that in my dualboot with Windows 7/Ubuntu 11.04, Windows start up as standard instead of Ubuntu? What can a wizard take instead of a familiar at 1st level? The familiar is brilliant feature for a wizard, but not for a prestige multiclassing one. Such a wizard stops upgrading his familiar once getting off the main road. So if he still wants to utilize his familiar, he should take the obtain familiar feat, but this would made the basic familiar feature redundant.  So what options can a wizard take instead of gaining a familiar at 1st level? Best way to reward an exceptionally good answer Have you ever gotten an answer soooo good, you wished you could give a +20 instead of +1 ?  Bounty System  That's a good mechanism, but they're not always right for this situation:   Bounties are usually associated with giving incentive to answer or draw traffic. I would expect that most users offered bounties before getting an answer, not after. Bounties are usually offered by people with plenty of reputation. "New" users should be able to reward exceptional answers too.   Thanking in a comment  A warm comment on the answer is always nice, but I'm not sure comments are intended for saying thanks - but to clarify / improve the answer itself.  So what is the recommended way to reward this truly exceptional answer?  Other suggestions?  I know there is an answer of the week blog, is there a way to nominate an answer to be there? Sometimes exceptional answers are hidden in low-interest questions that receive less traffic - so those will never be upvoted enough to become noticed.  Or maybe instead of a single blog for the entirety of SO, there should be an entire section called "Answer of the week" with more than one answer (maybe on a per-tag basis). Answers should arrive there based on manual nominations and not on upvotes so unpopular questions will not be discriminated against.  Clarification:  It's not that I'm personally against bounties - I use them plenty of times. I'm mostly concerned about what other people tend to do. I suspect the bounty post-answer reward is not used as much as it should. I believe the majority of people don't consider bounties for this purpose. Gravitational waves as dark energy? In a moment of cheapness, I decided not to order a 5v to 3.3v level shifter from Sparkfun, but instead to put it together myself.  The  used a  MOSFET, but since I enjoy surface-mount soldering about as much as root canal treatment, I decided to use a  that is through-hole mounted and easily available from my preferred supplier.  The results of this were sub-optimal.  When pulling the 5v line to ground, all was fine - the 3.3v side went to 0.07v.  But when pulling the 3.3v to ground, the 5v line showed around 4.14v (it was otherwise a touch above 5.1v).  On a closer reading of the datasheets involved, as well as the original Philips application note on the subject, I began to come to the conclusion that the gate threshold voltage was the problem.  By altering the schematic and tying the MOSFET's gate to 5v instead of 3.3v, both sides seem to work fine.  Pulling either side low causes the other side to go low.  I'm not, however, at all confident that this is actually a sane thing to do.  My understanding of the original schematic isn't deep enough to form a sensible opinion.  Will this modified schematic work, or are the current good results I'm seeing mere fluke or a precursor to something releasing magic smoke? "shyer" or "shier" My Longman dictionary states that the comparative of 'shy' is 'shyer'. However, at least two online dictionaries also give the form 'shier' as being acceptable:  and . On an English language  I came across a reference to British (shyer) vs. American (shier) spelling. But an Ngram chart shows that even in American English 'shyer' is much more used.  My problem is that I've been told that it is definitely wrong, but if it's in dictionaries then... has there been a change to what is wrong?   P.S.: Is it possible to increase Output Field Name length beyond 10 characters? When creating a new Column, the default value for the length of the name is 10. Using the Field Calculator via the Model Builder, I want to include the names of regional areas into the columns which has more than 10 characters.  Can the length of the Output Field Name be increased? How can I put two figures side-by-side? Not two sub-figures, but two actual figures with separate "Fig.: bla bla" captions.  A figure is supposed to spread over the entire text width, but I have two figures which are narrow and long, and I need to save the space in order to withstand the pages limit. TSA broke a lock for which they have a master key. How can I claim compensation? Restate theorem in separate file I state a theorem in the main body of a document and prove it in the appendix. I use thmtools's restatable environment to restate the theorem there. However, I now need to have my appendix in a separate pdf file (hence a separate tex document). I'm using xr and xcite to get the cross-references and bibliographical references to play nicely.  But the commands created by restatable are not carried. Is there any way to to the restating of the theorem in the appendix in a separate document?  Here's a MWE:  main document: main.tex  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{thmtools} \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}  \begin{document}  \begin{restatable}{theorem}{thmcmd}\label{thmlabel} Here is the statement of the theorem. \end{restatable}  The above is Theorem~\ref{thmlabel}.  In this way I can restate it: \thmcmd*  \end{document}   appendix: appendix.tex  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{xr} \externaldocument{main} \usepackage{thmtools} \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}  \begin{document}  I can refer to Theorem~\ref{thmlabel}.  But I cannot restate it like this: % \thmcmd*  \end{document} Link button in post editor escapes square brackets in code This applies to all d20 systems, but with an example from the from the Pathfinder  (emphasis mine):  Stonecunning: Dwarves receive a +2 bonus on Perception checks to potentially notice unusual stonework, such as traps and hidden doors located in stone walls or floors. They receive a check to notice such features whenever they pass within 10 feet of them, whether or not they are actively looking.  In this case, does the GM roll the check in secret or ask the player roll the check? If the GM asks the player to roll for the check, what stops situations like:  GM: (interrupting) &quot;Gimli, Roll a perception check.&quot; Dwarf player: &quot;Oh, it's a natural one, I guess I don't see anything.&quot; Human player: &quot;Okay, I'll roll a perception check for anything unusual in this room. Nice! 19. How about 19, does 19 work for you?&quot; GM: &quot;Gimli, everything looks kosher to you. Aragon, you notice a rock coloured tarp on the ground here, covering what looks like a pit trap.&quot;  In this case, by telling the dwarf to roll his &quot;free&quot; perception check, he's telegraphed to the players that there is something to notice. How can this be fixed, without bluffing checks for nothing in particular to throw off the signal to noise ratio of similar checks? Showing this metric space is complete Let $X=(0,1]$ and $d(x,y)=\left|\frac{1}{x}-\frac{1}{y}\right|$. I've proven $(X,d)$ is a metric space but I don't know how to show its completeness. How can I do that? Finder sidebar flashing text and high CPU load since El Capitan After update to OS X 10.11 I started having these bugs:   Finder sidebar text flashing  Very high CPU load:      I have Macbook Pro Retina 13" Mid 2014  I reset NVRAM.  I deleted com.apple.finder.plist, it didn't help.  Also I did this: , no longer flashes. How to return only the Date from a SQL Server DateTime datatype How do I show that if $f : [0,1] \to [0,1]$ is continuous, then there is some $c$ such that $f(c) = c$? Theorem: Let $f:[0,1] \to [0,1]$. Assume $f$ is continuous. Then there exists   $c \in [0, 1]$ such that $f(c) = c$.         For any function $f$, let $g(x) = f(x) − x$. If the theorem is true, what does that say about $g(c)$?   Write a proof of the theorem. Do it by applying the Intermediate Value Theorem   in the appropriate way to the function $g(x) = f(x) − x$ with $a = 0$ and $b = 1$. Clearly state why the hypotheses of the IVT are satisfied here.        Well if the theorem is true, then there exists $c$ such that $f(c) = c$. Then $f(c) - c = 0$. Then $g(c) = 0$. Intermediate Value Theorem: Let $I$ be an interval and $f$ a function whose domain contains $I$. If $f$ is continuous, then for all $a, b \in I$ with $a &lt; b$ and all real numbers $k$, if $k$ is strictly between $f (a)$ and $f (b)$, then there exists $c$ such that $a &lt; c &lt; b$ and $f (c) = k$.   Proof Attempt: Take $a = 0$ and $b = 1$. Then $a,b \in[0,1]$ and $a &lt; b$. Since $f:[0,1] \to [0,1]$, it follows that for all real numbers $k$ such that $f(a) &lt; k &lt; f(b)$, then there exists $c$ such that $a &lt; c &lt; b$ so $0 &lt; c &lt; 1$ and $f(c) = k$. Then $f(c) - k = 0$. Thus, since $g(x)=f(x)-x$, it follows that $g(c) = 0$.   Looking to see if I did this correctly and/or if there is a more elegant way to prove problem 2. I am a little confused why the first theorem is true, but I went with it. What's the most efficient way of determine individual card values for my collection? What is code coverage and how do YOU measure it? What is code coverage and how do YOU measure it?  I was asked this question regarding our automating testing code coverage. It seems to be that, outside of automated tools, it is more art than science. Are there any real-world examples of how to use code coverage? How to flatten a non-planar face to a targeted plane? Let's take a non-planar quad here for a simple example, how to only move one vertex on it, to finally make it planar while keeping the other three vertices still? What are uses of the C++ construct "placement new"?