When expressing opinions : to me vs for me
Expressing an opinion: to me or for me?
I would like to read in a number of files and pipe their output to subsequent programs while still maintaining them as individual pipelines of data.  program1 *.txt | program2 | program3 folder   I know what the above syntax can accomplish for single streams of data, but I am looking at keeping the files separate throughout the entire operation. The above would translate to the following:   program1 reads text files and pipes to program2 program2 processes data individually and pipes to program3 program3 writes data to files in folder with the same file names as the original   This kind of operation is currently the domain for build tools like Gulp, but I am trying to see if a shell can fully replace them. Since programs are written to handle only one stdin, it doesn't seem feasible.  The reading and writing of multiple files isn't an issue as I will just handle that within the programs themselves.  I have looked into the following, but they don't seem like the correct solution:   the tee command file descriptors substitutions   One possible way is to create a process for each individual file, and maintain a list of file names somewhere, but I am hoping for something more elegant. I have seen this construction quite often:      Online ads have been around since the dawn of the Web, but only in   recent years have they become the rapturous life dream of Silicon   Valley.   What is the rule there?. When your sentence doesn't start with pronoun + verb, invert them as verb + pronoun?. I know it sounds awkward but is it possible (grammatically correct) to use something similar to:      Online ads have been around since the dawn of the Web, but only in   recent years they have become...   And in any case, does this only work with have (or has)? Maybe it works fine with 'had' but I can't think of an example right now. Lebesgue measurable set that is not a Borel measurable set Is there a difference between installing an application via Ubuntu Software Center or a terminal? Evaluate the limit $\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{1+n^2} +\frac{2}{2+n^2}+ \ldots +\frac{n}{n+n^2}$ Evaluate the limit   $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{1}{1+n^2} +\dfrac{2}{2+n^2}+ \ldots+\dfrac{n}{n+n^2}$$   My approach :   If I divide numerator and denominator by $n^2$ I get :   $$\lim_{ n \to \infty} \dfrac{\frac{1}{n^2}}{\frac{1}{n^2} +1} +\dfrac{\frac{2}{n^2}}{\frac{2}{n^2} +1} + \ldots+ \dfrac{\frac{1}{n}}{\frac{1}{n} + 1}=0$$   but the answer is $\dfrac{1}{2}$ please suggest how to solve this.. thanks. "The Struts dispatcher cannot be found" error while deploying application on WebLogic 12.1.3 Are there any massless (zero invariant mass) particles carrying electric charge?  If not, why not? Do we expect to see any or are they a theoretical impossibility? The problem statement is: for $a,b$ coprime, prove that there exists positive integers $x,y$ such that $ax-by=1$.  The question is form Arthur Egnels' problem solving text, and from the chapter on the pigeonhole principle.    My question: His proof begins by generating a list $a,\ldots,a(b-1)$, where he then points out that each element in this list(which proceeds sequentially) doesn't have remainder $0\pmod{b}$.  He then shows that we arrive at a contradiction if we assume that we also don't get remainder $1$ in this list $\bmod b$.  To show the contradiction in this last statement, he first states that we would have positive integers $p,q $ where $ 0&lt;p&lt;q&lt;b$ so that $pa\equiv qa \pmod{b}$.  He then goes on to point out that since we $a$ and $b$ are coprime, we then have that $b| q-p$.  I understand the last part here, but don't see why we get $pa\equiv qa \pmod{b}$.  Thanks in advance I think it would make sense to split up the flag "This is not an answer" into three flag choices:   This should be a comment This should be an edit This should be a new question   If we had that, it would make it easier (and therefore more efficient) for mods to figure out what to do with answers flagged thusly. Is there a standard naming convention for XML elements? Is there any standard, de facto or otherwise, for XML documents? For example which is the "best" way to write a tag?  &lt;MyTag /&gt; &lt;myTag /&gt; &lt;mytag /&gt; &lt;my-tag /&gt; &lt;my_tag /&gt;   Likewise if I have an enumerated value for an attribute which is better  &lt;myTag attribute="value one"/&gt; &lt;myTag attribute="ValueOne"/&gt; &lt;myTag attribute="value-one"/&gt; Why don't Minidumps give good call stacks? How to print only last column? echo -e 'one two three\nfour five six\nseven eight nine' one two three four five six seven eight nine   how can I do some "MAGIC" do get this output?:  three six nine   UPDATE: I don't need it in this specific way, I need a general solution so that no matter how many columns are in a row, e.g.: awk always displays the last column. PHP mail function doesn't complete sending of e-mail How do we know that certain quantum effects are random? Discord suddenly very slow How do I remove all attributes which are undefined or null in a JavaScript object?  (Question is similar to  for Arrays) Finding the maximum value of $\int_0^1 f^3(x)dx$ Find the maximum value of $\int_0^1 f^3(x)dx$ given that $-1 \le f(x) \le 1$ and $\int_0^1 f(x)dx = 0$   I could not find a way to solve this problem. I tried to use the cauchy-schwarz inequality but could not proceed further  $$\int_0^1 f(x) \cdot f^2(x) dx \le \sqrt{\left(\int_0^1f^4(x)dx\right) \left( \int_0^1 f^2(x) dx\right)}$$  Any hints/solutions are appreciated. With arrays, why is it the case that a[5] == 5[a]? As Joel points out in , in  (aka: K &amp; R), there is mention of this property of arrays in C: a[5] == 5[a]  Joel says that it's because of pointer arithmetic but I still don't understand. Why does a[5] == 5[a]? Why do the less than symbol () appear wrong as upside down exclamation (¡) or question mark (¿)? What is the best indicator in finding out whether a database is utilized or accessed?  I tried index statistics and  based on I/O utilization but none seem to be a good indicator.   Problem: I have a lot of databases on a development environment and due to space issues we are trying to decommission those that are not used without actually messing with the ones that are really needed.