How to display user information?
How to view the user's status?
Pie Chart without labels in beamer using pgf-pie EDIT The accepted answer completely solves my immediate problem, but for more detailed analysis of the underlying issue please refer to answer by cfr. Basically, pstricks and pdfTex don't mix well.  I have a beamer presentation with a lot of pie charts. I use pgf-pie package because it is easy and (mostly) does what I need. I have one particular pie-chart that should have no labels at all. I have tried adding  /tikz/nodes={text opacity=0,overlay}   to the code following advice found here.    \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{pgf-pie} \begin{document}  \begin{tikzpicture} \pie [explode=0.1, color={blue!70, green!80, red, yellow} ,/tikz /nodes={text opacity=0,overlay}]{10/, 20/, 30/, 40/} \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   Now, the strange thing is, the code works well in the example above (standalone class). However, it doesn't seem to do anything inside a beamer presentation, i.e. the labels still show. It seems that there is some sort of package conflict. How could I enable this to work in the beamer presentation? I know there are other ways to produce this but pgf-pie is quite handy otherwise.  \documentclass[12pt,compress]{beamer} \usetheme{Warsaw}  \setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}%remove navigation symbols \setbeamercolor{alerted text}{fg=magenta}  %\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{multicol} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{xcolor} %\usepackage{iwona} \usepackage{wrapfig} \input{FactorTree} \usepackage{pstricks} \usetikzlibrary{matrix} \usepackage{tkz-euclide} \usetkzobj[all] \usepackage{xlop} \usepackage{tcolorbox} \usepackage{pgfplots} \usepackage{pgf-pie} \usepackage[makeroom]{cancel} \input{longdiv} What is the correct way to create a single-instance WPF application? A few days ago I was recalling some facts about the $p$-adic numbers, for example the fact that the $p$-adic metric is an ultrametric implies very strongly that there is no order on $\mathbb{Q}_p$, as any number in the interior of an open ball is in fact its center.  I know that if you take the completion of the algebraic closure of the $p$-adic completion you get something which is isomorphic to $\mathbb{C}$ (this result was very surprising until I studied model theory, then it became obvious).  Furthermore, if the algebraic closure is of an extension of dimension $2$ then the field is orderable, or even real closed. Either way, it implies that the $p$-adic numbers don't have this property.  So I was thinking, is there a $p$-adic number whose square equals $2$? $3$? $2011$? For which prime numbers $p$? How far down the rabbit hole of algebraic numbers can you go inside the $p$-adic numbers? Are there general results connecting the choice (or rather properties) of $p$ to the "amount" of algebraic closure it gives? Allow converting comments to answers What is a rocket engine thrusting against in space? Why was a moved question deleted? Moderator to whom deletion is attributed claims they didn't do it A  appears to have been deleted, and deletion is attributed to a moderator,  deleted by Sathyajith Bhat♦ 12 hours ago , however,  (however, they did previously (unsuccessfully) tried migrating it to another site in the network where they're also a moderator, but migration was rejected by another moderator, it was then on hold on webapps, and then the hold was removed, which was supposed to have been the end of it).  Can someone explain what's going on here?  And restore the question that clearly wasn't meant to have been deleted, was a HNQ, and has 75 votes on the question, plus 74 votes on the top answer, and 56 on second answer; and 19 on third?  There's a lot of links to this question, too, and now they're all broken, making SE look like a community hostile to a popular question ontopic for the site it was on. How can I match a quote-delimited string with a regex? If I'm trying to match a quote-delimited string with a regex, which of the following is "better" (where "better" means both more efficient and less likely to do something unexpected):  /"[^"]+"/ # match quote, then everything that's not a quote, then a quote   or  /".+?"/   # match quote, then *anything* (non-greedy), then a quote   Assume for this question that empty strings (i.e. "") are not an issue. It seems to me (no regex newbie, but certainly no expert) that these will be equivalent.   Update: Upon reflection, I think changing the + characters to * will handle empty strings correctly anyway. I am currently in a clan with three members. When we tried to initiate a clan war it said we had insufficient clan requirements. Does anyone know what the full requirements are? Is there a minimum clan member requirement? Need to schedule a job every hour in jenkins I'm New to Jenkins. I have a job which i need to schedule every 1 hour.  I am using   * */1 * * *    but it is not working effectively.  Please provide any other solution. My sisters and I all have iPhones under the same account. I also have an iPad under the same account. I am trying to get the iMessage on my iPad compatible with my phone number, not email address.   The only phone number choice to choose from is my sister's iPhone number. How can I choose my phone number for iMessage on my iPad? What is $48\div2(9+3)$? Clipping Rasters with a mask layer error I've got a NDVI layer that I'm trying to clip with a vector file but when I try and use GDAL Tools clipper I get an error.  That shows up like this:  What am I doing wrong?  This is before I even pick the mask layer!  Traceback (most recent call last):   File "C:/PROGRA~1/QUANTU~1/apps/qgis/./python/plugins\GdalTools\tools\widgetPluginBase.py", line 28, in someValueChanged     self.emit(SIGNAL("valuesChanged(const QStringList &amp;)"), self.getArguments())   File "C:/PROGRA~1/QUANTU~1/apps/qgis/./python/plugins\GdalTools\tools\doClipper.py", line 105, in getArguments     return self.getArgsModeMask()   File "C:/PROGRA~1/QUANTU~1/apps/qgis/./python/plugins\GdalTools\tools\doClipper.py", line 143, in getArgsModeMask     if self.alphaBandCheck.isChecked(): TypeError: 'sip.methoddescriptor' object is not callable  Python version: 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 21 2008, 13:11:45) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)]  QGIS version: 1.7.3-Wroclaw Wroclaw, 00624b3  Python path: ['C:\Users\dean.walker\.qgis\python\plugins\GeoCoding', 'C:\Users\dean.walker\.qgis\python\plugins\GeoCoding', 'C:/PROGRA~1/QUANTU~1/apps/qgis/./python', 'C:/Users/dean.walker/.qgis/python', 'C:/Users/dean.walker/.qgis/python/plugins', 'C:/PROGRA~1/QUANTU~1/apps/qgis/./python/plugins', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\bin\python25.zip', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\DLLs', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\lib', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\lib\plat-win', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\lib\lib-tk', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\qgis\bin', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\lib\site-packages', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\lib\site-packages\win32', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\lib\site-packages\win32\lib', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\lib\site-packages\Pythonwin', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\Python25\lib\site-packages\wx-2.8-msw-unicode', '/usr/share/qgis/python', 'C:\PROGRA~1\QUANTU~1\apps\qgis\python\plugins\fTools\tools'] Copying prod multi-site installation to dev multi-site installation I am attempting to upgrade my Drupal 8.9.2 multi-site installation to D9. I was hoping to work this all out on a development installation, that is located in a subdirectory of my home directory on my NameCheap Shared Hosting plan. When I first installed this installation, I did so using the tarball method from years ago. I then followed the instructions given here (). I was able to get the current running prod version converted to use composer with out an issue. Before I go and start messing with the files, and attempting to upgrade to D9 through composer on a prod installation, I wanted to copy these files over to another installation where I can use it as a sandbox. To do this I:  copied the files on my server to a new directory made clone databases for the new installation truncated all the cache tables in the cloned DB changed all the database settings in the settings files to point to the cloned databases  I've done this before without any issues, and now I seem to be getting a WSOD error on all the sites running from the new installation. The error I'm getting is  PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught Error: Class 'Drupal\Core\Cache\DatabaseBackend' not found in ~/{new installation dir}/public_html/index.php:16.  If anyone has any thoughts what's going on I am all ears. Thank you in advance Let $f$ be a complex function with the property that $f^{(n)} = 0$.  Does this imply that $f$ is a polynomial?  If so, why?  Upon thinking about this problem myself, I can easily observe that every $n$ degree polynomial satisfies $f^{(n+1)} = 0$.  Still, this doesn't show that some non-polynomial function couldn't also have this property. A 398MB directory was only compressed to 393MB using 7Z and Normal ZIP compression. Is this normal? If so, why do people continue to use ZIP on Windows? Is Dishonored an open-world game? I was considering whether or not to buy Dishonored, and watching gameplay of it on Youtube, when a thought popped into my head: is Dishonored free-roam? Can you go anywhere you want, similarly to Fallout or The Elder Scrolls? With the listings package, I would like to color the integers out of strings and comments and out of keywords too. The question for coloring numbers     . Some answer handle the numbers occurring within comments, strings or barewords, but no solution given work when a keyword contain a number. Which is annoying because C and C++ have a lot of types with a number in them, like uint32_t.  Here is a small example.  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage{listings}  \definecolor{darkgreen}{rgb}{0.18,0.54,0.34} \definecolor{maroon}{rgb}{0.64,0.16,0.16} \definecolor{darkpink}{rgb}{0.75,0.25,0.5}  \lstdefinestyle{myc++}{     language=[ISO]C++,     keywordstyle=\color{darkgreen}\bfseries,     commentstyle=\color{blue}\textit,     stringstyle=\color{darkpink}\ttfamily, %     literate=*     {0}{{{\textcolor{red}0}}}1     {1}{{{\textcolor{red}1}}}1     {2}{{{\textcolor{red}2}}}1     {3}{{{\textcolor{red}3}}}1     {4}{{{\textcolor{red}4}}}1     {5}{{{\textcolor{red}5}}}1     {6}{{{\textcolor{red}6}}}1     {7}{{{\textcolor{red}7}}}1     {8}{{{\textcolor{red}8}}}1     {9}{{{\textcolor{red}9}}}1,     escapeinside={|}{|}, %     morekeywords={int32_t} }  \begin{document}  \begin{lstlisting}[style=myc++] // In comment: 42 int32_t in_keyword = 80085; char *in_identifier|2| = "And in string 1337\n"; \end{lstlisting}  \end{document}   And the result:    The star for literate avoid to coloring the digits inside comments or strings. The escapeinside avoid coloring the digits inside a bareword when specifically marked. But I have yet to find how to color int32_t as a keyword. "This edit would have to be a suggested edit" / edit button grayed out A couple of times recently when I attempted to edit a post while reviewing it from the "First Posts" queue, I received the following message when I tried to submit the form:  This edit would have to be a suggested edit. (x)   This is a rather cryptic message, considering that edits made from a review are suggested edits, subject to the same peer review process. There was no indication of how the edit would have to be submitted differently, much less why. I searched both help and meta for more information about this message, but came up empty.  The first time it happened, after I cancelled out I saw that someone else had just edited the post, so I thought maybe that's why I couldn't submit an edit from the review (and wondered why, if that's the case, the error message didn't just say that instead of telling me something that doesn't make any sense - that the edit I'm trying to suggest can't be submitted because it would have to be a suggested edit). However, the second time I received this message (last night, for this question: ), there was no other edit. So, I clicked the No action needed button and tried to edit the post outside the review process, only to discover that the edit link was grayed out.   I see several explanations of possible causes for graying out the edit link here: . However, there was no tooltip when I hovered over the disabled link, and the edit queue was in the single digits.  A few minutes later, I noticed that the edit link was no longer grayed out, so I edited the post and my edit was accepted.   My best hypothesis based on my experience with the error so far and the explanations I've read here at meta is that someone submitted a suggested edit while I was reviewing the post, which (a) caused me to get the cryptic error message and (b) caused the edit link to be grayed out when I accessed the post the normal way. Then a few minutes later, the suggested edit was rejected, opening up the question for new edit suggestions.  Rather than speculating about it and trying to determine the answer scientifically, it would be helpful if someone could give me the answer (as Seinfeld fans might put it, "Why don't you just tell me why I can't edit the post?"). It would be even more helpful if the error message itself provided the explanation, or if the message were defined somewhere in the help pages. But, at the very least, hopefully there will soon be an answer on meta to enlighten people who scratch their chins over this in the future. :) I heard myself saying something was "tickety-boo", meaning good, successful, or satisfactory. Does anyone know where this strange-sounding phrase originated? This is probably a silly question, but how can I run ANOVA using only the mean, standard deviation, and the sample size?  i.e.  Group  mean    sd    n  1:    200      5    5    2:    100     22    5  3:    150     14    5   I am using Statsoft Statistica software.  I know how to run it using the spreadsheet with all the data, but I have never done this using only the information listed above.  Any information would be greatly appreciated.