LyX to Latex conversion problem
Why does latex stretch small sections across the whole page vertically?
How can I separate multiple quote blocks? I have a series of quotes which I want to display in two separate quote blocks.  &gt; Are questions about Microsoft Word Online on-topic here? I don't &gt; really see any posted here, but perhaps I am not searching correctly. &gt; - mweiss &gt;  &gt; Yes, they are. We even have a specific tag: [tag:word-online]. -ale &gt;  &gt; Thanks! I'm sorry I missed that tag. -mweiss   When I try to add these to my post, they display as a single combined quote.     Are questions about Microsoft Word Online on-topic here? I don't   really see any posted here, but perhaps I am not searching correctly.   - mweiss      Yes, they are. We even have a specific tag: . -ale      Thanks! I'm sorry I missed that tag. -mweiss   How can I separate quotes so that they aren't combined into a single quote block? Hello Physics StackExchange!  I will put the TL;DR in the beginning: I need a self contained, relatively hand-holding sequence of textbooks that covers up from the end of Griffith's Intro to QM to relativistic QM/particle physics to QFT.    This will be my first post. I'm a medical physics grad student who majored in biomedical engineering for my undergrad, with serious regrets about not doing math/physics double major in hindsight. Oh well. I've made it my goal to eventually understand QFT.  My background in relevant subjects is Calc 1 to 3 and Diff EQ, 2 part freshman physics, an E&amp;M course that used Griffiths Electrodynamics, a summer of self studying Griffith's QM (got most of the way through). I will also be officially taking a class in QM using Griffith's textbook this next spring. I am aware of the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian approaches to mechanics as well. In addition I have familiarity with special and basic general relativity using tensors and all this. What would be the best way for me to get from where I am now to a strong understanding of QFT autodidactically? I have no aversion to studying pure maths where I need to.  EDIT: My question is much different than simply asking for a handholding explanation of QFT. Generally these textbooks assume a certain amount of physics/math background, and I was asking for a sequence of textbooks leading up to QFT from the end of a specific textbook, Griffith's QM. Did you even read my question? Did you read the thing you linked me to? Spontaneous electroweak symmetry breaking (i.e. $SU(2)\times U(1)\to U(1)_{em}$ ) is at scale about 100 Gev. So, for , gauge bosons $Z$ &amp; $W$ have masses about 100 GeV. But before this spontaneous symmetry breaking ( i.e. Energy > 100 GeV) the symmetry $SU(2)\times U(1)$ is not broken, and therefore gauge bosons are massless.  The same thing happens when we go around energy about $10^{16}$ GeV, where we have the Grand Unification between electroweak and strong interactions, in some bigger group ($SU(5)$, $SO(10)$ or others). So theoretically we should find gauge bosons $X$ and $Y$ with masses about $10^{16}$ GeV after GUT symmetry breaks into the Standard Model gauge group $SU(3)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$, and we should find massless X and Y bosons at bigger energies (where GUT isn't broken).  So this is what happened in the early universe: when temperature decreased, spontaneous symmetry breaking happened and firstly $X$ &amp; $Y$ gauge bosons obtained mass and finally $Z$ &amp; $W$ bosons obtained mass.   Now, I ask: have I understood this correctly? In other words, if we make experiments at energy above the electroweak scale (100 GeV) we are where $SU(2)\times U(1)$ isn't broken and then we should (experimentally) find $SU(2)$ and $U(1)$ massless gauge bosons, i.e. $W^1$, $W^2$, $W^3$ and $B$ with zero mass? But this is strange, because if I remember well in LHC we have just make experiments at energy about 1 TeV, but we haven't discovered any massless gauge bosons. Support anchor names in posts I admit this feature request is probably somewhat limited in useful scope, but I'm throwing it out there anyway. Inspired by , and because I want to use it on , I'm requesting that name be supported on a tags in posts.  On very long answers, such as the closing/migration guidance answer, this would allow direct linking to the specific closure reason. This would then allow us, when someone , to link directly to the appropriate reason and description thereof.  I recognize the limited scope of this, however, I have seen other long answers that could stand to have that kind of "deep" linking ability as well.  (The original incarnation of this post had either name or id, but preferenced name. Per Koper's answer, which I agree with, I took out the idea of supporting id, because Koper's right -- too dangerous.) What is the preferred way to find focused control in WinForms app? How can I show that if the second fundamental form of a surface is identically equal to zero, then the surface is a plane? This is my question:  Let P be a plane considered as a surface in 3-space. Show that its second fundamental form is zero. Conversely, show that if the second fundamental form of a surface is identically zero then the surface is a plane.  So far I have that the general equation of the plane is $$ax+by+cz+d=0.$$ Then $$M(u,v)=(u,v,\alpha u + \beta v + \gamma),$$ where $a,b,c,d,\alpha,\beta, \gamma$ are all constants and $c\not=0$. Then $M_u=(1,0,\alpha)$ and $M_v=(0,1,\beta)$. I know that $\vec{n} =\frac{M_u \times M_v}{|M_u \times M_v|}$ which gives $$ \vec{n}=\frac{(-\alpha,-\beta, 1)}{\sqrt{\alpha^2+\beta^2+1}}.$$ Hence, the unit norm is a constant. $$ M_{uu}=M_{uv}=M_{vv}=0$$ Hence $l=m=n=0$, so the second fundamental form is $$ ldu^2+mdudv+ndv^2=0.$$  Now I need to show the converse, but I don't know how. Please help :) Why are the holodecks on Voyager in use if they have energy issues? I'm watching the first two seasons of Voyager and various episodes have commentary on having energy limitations -- but we constantly see crew using extremely complicated holodeck simulations. Why would they allow use of the holodeck if they need to conserve energy? Showing a number $n$ is prime if $(n-2)! \equiv 1 \pmod n$ How is the passage of time handled in Pokemon? I stopped following the Pokemon anime a while ago, but I know the series has had Ash go through many regions, including retreading at least one of them.  When Ash was about to get his eight badge, Misty mentioned that they'd been on the road for a year at that point.  I saw some recent episodes, and Ash looks nearly identical to when he first started as a trainer.  Normally I'd attribute that to cartoon sitcom logic, where the characters never age; but in a series with continuity and references to earlier seasons, this makes no sense.  What's the official word on a timeline for the Pokemon anime? Is it possible to do a multiline pattern match using sed, awk or grep? Take for example, I would like to get all the lines between { and }  So it should be able to match    1. {}  2. {.....}  3. {.....      .....}  Initially the question used &lt;p&gt; as an example. Edited the question to use { and}. Multiple outputs for beamer handouts I'm currently generating some presentations with beamer for students of my course. Some like to print the material, so I created a handout. Some students prefer to have 2,3,4,6 etc. pages per sheet of A4 paper. How can I go about to automatize the following code, so that it outputs 4 different files in 1x2,1x3,2x2,2x3 format?  I'd like to avoid having to compile it again everytime for the different formats.  \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{pdfpages}  \begin{document} \includepdf[pages=1-last,nup=1x2,landscape=false,frame=true,             noautoscale=false,scale=1,delta=0mm 5mm]{Pres7Chap13-Handout.pdf} \end{document} Find the limit if it exists of $S_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2}(S_n +\frac{A}{S_n})$ I seem to have screwed up something that allows you to inset evenly, I think I have tried every combination of settings in inset and pivot center and even is far from even.  I tried uninstalling and re installing blender 2.71 and get the same result.  The image attached is a simple default cube that I tried to inset evenly.  I have also attached the blend file link  help?? Proving Pascal's identity So I came across Pascal's identity: Prove that for any fixed $r\geq 1$, and all $n\geq r$, $$ \binom{n+1}{r}=\binom{n}{r}+\binom{n}{r-1}. $$  I know you can use basic algebra or even an inductive proof to prove this identity, but that seems really cumbersome. I was wondering if anyone had a "cleaner" or more elegant way of proving it. For example, I think the following would be a decent combinatorial proof.   Proof: Let $S$ be a set with $n+1$ elements, and consider some fixed $x\in S$. There are $\binom{n+1}{r}\;\; r$-subsets of $S$--count them according to whether or not they contain $x$: there are $\binom{n}{r}$ not containing $x$, (each formed by choosing $r$ of the remaining $n$ elements in $S\setminus\{x\}$), and there are $\binom{n}{r-1}\;\; r$-sets containing $x$, (each formed by selecting an additional $r-1$ elements in $S\setminus\{x\}$).   Is that right? Are there any other efficient ways of doing it? Bread and butter is/are my breakfast? Bread and butter (is or are) my breakfast?  And what's the difference between the above sentence and saying "My breakfast is bread and butter"?  Thanks. When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java? I've always been one to simply use:  List&lt;String&gt; names = new ArrayList&lt;&gt;();   I use the interface as the type name for portability, so that when I ask questions such as these I can rework my code.    When should  be used over  and vice-versa? HTTP and HTTPS impacts on SEO I have a website http://www.domain_1.com/ hosted in a shared webserver.  I have used SSL for another website https://www.domain_2.com/ on the same server.  Due to some technical limitations (single IP), if you try https://www.domain_1.com, browser will show the same domain_2 website. But this is not a concern for me.  Question: will this scnario impact SEO of domain_1 (non-HTTPS) site? Is it acceptable to vote to close a question without leaving a comment? Although  is obviously an exceptionally poor question, it still amazes me that 5 people can vote to close and yet not one of them leave a comment to help explain how the poster can improve their question.  I see loads of similar examples where questions from new users are closed and heavily voted down without anyone taking any effort to explain why - not a pleasant experience for new users.  Is there anything that can be done to encourage users to leave comments when voting to close? What is the correct way to create a single-instance WPF application? What do you call someone who solves puzzles? What is a term or name for someone who is very adept at solving puzzles or situations that require though processing and logic.   I ran across , however this only deals with crossword puzzles. I'm looking for something that could be applied on a broader sense.