How to fetch own mobile number in android
Programmatically obtain the phone number of the Android phone
I am trying to write code with rotates an object.  I implemented it as:  Rotation about X-axis is given by the amount of change in y coordinates of a mouse and  Rotation about Y-axis is given by the amount of change in x coordinates of a mouse.  This method is simple and work fine until on the the axis coincides with Z-axis, in short a gimble lock occurs.  How can I utilize the rotation arount Z-axis to avoid gimbal lock. Detecting absolute motion inside a box This is not a contradiction and I know it is impossible but still consider a thought experiment by me and point out if something is wrong. See the following picture and then the explanation follows.    Rest frames are easy to understand. They are just for clarification. Lets move on to the moving frames. The velocity of the box is $0.1\ c$. Now a photon is emitted (I am not taking a light ray to avoid complication in discussion). After emission the box also moves a certain distance ahead. So the photon takes more than one second to reach the wall. But even the source moves that much distance ahead. When the light is reflected back, the source and the wall again move forward as the box is moving. But after reflection the wall has no role to play. We are concerned about the source. The source moves a certain distance ahead and therefore light takes less than one second to reach back. But the difference of the first case and the second case is not the same. To explain, I will give some equations.  Moving frame 1:  Velocity of the box: $0.1\ c = 30,000km/s$  Time taken by light to reach the wall $=\frac{330,000\ \text{km}}{300,000\ \text{kms}^{-1}}= 1.1s$  Distance moved ahead by the box from original position: $30,000\ \text{km}$  Moving frame 2:  distance moved ahead by the box from original position  $&gt;30,000\ \text{km}$ as the box also moves ahead after reflection.  let $d$ be the distance moved ahead by the box after reflection.  Time taken by light to reach the source: $\frac{270,000\ \text{km}\ -\ d}{300,000\ \text{kms}^{-1}} &lt;0.9s$  Therefore we see that this could possibly determine the absolute motion.  So in total we see that the light will take lesser time to reach the source. Please correct me if I am wrong and give your opinion why is it so.  EDIT 2 for clarification  The box is the compartment in space in which you are moving and I am calculating the time the light takes to reach back the source. I am not even adding velocities. Please correct me and tell me where did I add velocities. For clarification just let me give a simple example. Suppose person A is standing still and B is running towards a light source. Obviously he will see the light before person A even though the speed would be the same. So, what I am doing over here is not increasing the speed of light, but instead decreasing the distance to be covered by it. Wavy stream of liquid While pouring a liquid into a glass from a bottle, some streams have a wavy shape, like the one in the following photo:    What causes the stream to be of such a shape? I'm trying to understand the /etc/rsyslog.conf file, but I'm missing something. For example, this is a part of the file:  auth,authpriv.*         /var/log/auth.log *.*;auth,authpriv.none      -/var/log/syslog cron.*              /var/log/cron.log daemon.*            -/var/log/daemon.log kern.*              -/var/log/kern.log lpr.*               -/var/log/lpr.log mail.*              -/var/log/mail.log user.*              -/var/log/user.log   According to  page:     The facility is one of the following keywords: auth, authpriv, cron,   daemon, kern, lpr, mail, mark, news, security (same as auth), syslog,   user, uucp and local0 through local7.      The priority is one of the following keywords, in ascending order:   debug,info, notice, warning, warn (same as warning), err, error (same   as err) crit, alert, emerg, panic (same as emerg). The keywords error,   warn and panic are deprecated and should not be used anymore. The   priority defines the severity of the message.      An asterisk ("*") stands for all facilities or all priorities,   depending on where it is used (before or after the period). The   keyword none stands for no priority of the given facility.      You can specify multiple facilities with the same priority pattern in   one statement using the comma (",") operator. You may specify as much   facilities as you want. Remember that only the facility part from such   a statement is taken, a priority part would be skipped.      Multiple selectors may be specified for a single action using the   semicolon (";") separator. Remember that each selector in the   selector field is capable to overwrite the preceding ones. Using this   behavior you can exclude some priorities from the pattern.   So, this is pretty understandable but what about the file path on the right. It can be just a path, or path with | or - before it (or maybe even something else). What is the difference between the three? How to reverse the pagination numbers of an archive? I have archive pages that each contain titles and excerpts from 10 blog entries. Both entries and archive pages are in reverse chronological order:   when a new blog entry is written its title and excerpt go to the top of the front page; when you are on one page and you click through to "Next page", you get the titles and excerpts for the 10 previous blog entries.   This is pretty standard for blogs.  But the archive pages are numbered by default in the same order. Thus Page 1 contains excerpts from the most recent 10 entries, Page 2 contains excerpts from the next 10 most recent, etc.  To be clear: at the moment, "Next page" refers to the page with the next higher number. Thus the front page, which contains excerpts from the most recent entry and the nine next most recent entries, is labelled Page 1, and the 10 entries posted before those 10 entries are on Page 2.  I need the page-numbering the other way round, namely in direct chronological order, so that for example if there are 97 entries then   entries 28-37 would be excerpted on Page 4, and the PREVIOUS page from there, containing excerpts from entries 18-27, would be called page 3.   How can I achieve this, whether by amending functions.php in the child theme (preferably), by writing a "Snippet" (next most preferred), or by amending archive.php in the Astra parent theme directly (least preferred, because of possible update problems)?  Edit  The following isn't a solution but it may be part of one. This re-numbers pages into direct chronological order, but unfortunately it also reverses the order in which they are shown (from reverse chronological to direct chronological). So it causes the front archive paget to contain excerpts from the earliest posts rather than the latest ones!  &lt;?php  add_filter('pre_get_posts', 'posts_by_forward_date');  function posts_by_forward_date($query) {   if(is_archive() || is_home()) {     $query-&gt;set('order', 'ASC');   } } ?&gt; What is the "rootless" feature in El Capitan, really? I have just learned about the "Rootless" feature in El Capitan, and I am hearing things like "There is no root user", "Nothing can modify /System" and "The world will end because we can't get root".  What is the "Rootless" feature of El Capitan at a technical level? What does it actually mean for the user experience and the developer experience? Will sudo -s still work, and, if so, how will the experience of using a shell as root change? How can I show notify-send messages triggered by crontab? Every $R$-module is a quotient of a free module I'm reading through my notes, and I have a theorem as the title says. As proof I have only a picture.    where $v:m\mapsto(0,...,0,1,0,...,0)$ and 1 is at $m$-th position. I know, that $\oplus_M R$ is a free module generated by set  $M$, but is this all? I do not see how the statement is proved. Background Nowadays, I see &quot;them&quot; used to mean &quot;those&quot; a lot. I don't know if it was as common in the past. For example, take &quot;one of &quot;. On researching about it, I found some people say it comes from a dialect of British English. Some others say it is a &quot;non-standard&quot; usage. I see this usage in Canadian English also, and it seems some people use it in a sarcastic way. Moreover, I have seen a song titled &quot;one of them days&quot;. I also read, in the book called &quot;A Broken Promise&quot;, &quot;&quot; Finally, Wikipedia says that it is a usage in  (a common name for the Southern Midland dialect of American English):  Pronouns and demonstratives &quot;Them&quot; is sometimes used in place of &quot;those&quot; as a demonstrative in both nominative and oblique constructions. Examples are &quot;Them are the pants I want&quot; and &quot;Give me some of them crackers.&quot;    Question(s): What would you say about the usage of this word? Is it correct? Could we use it in daily speech? Could this usage go beyond a specific dialect and be used in other dialects, regions, etc.? Does it really originate from Appalachian English? Why did this usage become popular among other English speakers? Note: I have already seen a similar question:  However, it only says, &quot;ungrammatical,&quot; there. This question is specific to this situation only, and there is more to it. I would like to remove my Raspberry Pi from my iPhone 8 (running iOS 11.2.1) as a connected bluetooth device.  Normally, I would go into my Settings -> Bluetooth and select the Info button (a small blue circled "i") to show the "Disconnect" and "Forget Device" dialogs:    Unfortunately, iOS does not give me this option for my device. The bluetooth device list does not contain an "i" for the item, and there is seemingly no other way to disconnect.    How do I unpair this device if there is no button to trigger to the unpair prompt?  Due to work restrictions I cannot completely reset the device. Why does the Sun's (or other stars') nuclear reaction not use up all its "fuel" immediately? The temperature and pressure everywhere inside the Sun reach the critical point to start nuclear reactions - there is no reason for it to take such a long time to complete the reaction process.  Just like a nuclear bomb will complete all the reaction within $10^{-6}$seconds.  Why does most of the hydrogen of the Sun still not react even though it reaches the critical point, and why take stars billions of years to run out of fuel? When does $\lim_{n\to\infty}f(x+\frac{1}{n})=f(x)$ a.e. fail Player looses boot after tackle Receiving Push Notifications while in background Data from multiple lists using single REST API call H2G2 — Teleportation Also Results in Time Travel? How do I redirect to another webpage? Scheduling a team based activity with 10 different teams and X different games. Every team must meet each other ONCE but never twice, derivative of a determinant of matrix Let $A,B\in M_{n\times n}(\mathbb{R})$, prove that $$(\frac{d}{dt}\det(A+tB))_{t=0} = Tr(cof(A)^{T}\cdot B), $$ where $cof(A)$ is the cofactor matrix of $A$. I tried expanding it using row expansion, but it gets messed up. Any help? Can black holes form in a finite amount of time? One thing I know about black holes is that an object gets closer to the event horizon, gravitation time dilation make it move more slower from an outside perspective, so that it looks like it take an infinite amount of time for the object to reach the event horizon. It seems like a similar process should slow the formation of the black hole itself: As the star collapses, its gravitational time dilation make itself collapse more slowly. This make me wonder, are what astronomers claim to be black holes really black holes, or are they stars that progressively make themselves more similar to one without actually reaching the stage of having an event horizon?  EDIT: Contemplating one answer, I realize the question is ambiguous. What does finite time mean in general relativity. Here is a less ambiguous question: Is there a connected solution of 3+1 dimensional general relativity with one space-like slice not have a singularity, and another space-like slice having one.