Jquery Validation for dynamically added rows that has multiple element with same name
Why jquery validation is not working on appended elements?
iPhone with broken home button is stuck on black screen after jailbreaking Random point uniform on a sphere If $X=(x,y,z)$ is a random point uniform on the unit sphere in $\mathbb{R}^3$,  Are the  coordinates $x$, $y$, $z$ uniform in interval $(-1,1)$? How can I force my browser to search Google in English? I'm too bored of seeing sites like Google and such show up in my native language, I would rather like them to be in English. Yet, I have to explicitly change the URL to .com and en and that kind of parameters in order for them to show up in English. Can I somehow force this?  So, how is Google configured?  However, it is set to English on the site itself so it has to be my browser:    Then, how does my browser land up on non-english pages, like Google?  It usually shows up in non-English when I'm performing a search, which uses:  {google:baseURL}search?{google:RLZ}{google:acceptedSuggestion}{google:originalQueryForSuggestion}{google:searchFieldtrialParameter}{google:instantFieldTrialGroupParameter}sourceid=chrome&amp;ie={inputEncoding}&amp;q=%s   When performing a search, it fills these variables in with non-english values.  How can I tell my browser to fill these in with the English values?  My Google Chrome options give preference to English: Finitely generated group which is not finitely presented Is there any easy group theoretical way of showing that the wreath product $G$ of two infinite cyclic groups is not finitely presented?  I was looking for a finitely presented group with a central subgroup isomorphic to the free group of countable rank and whose factor group is isomorphic to $G$; in this way assuming that $G$ is finitely presented we get a contradiction.   Any ideas? How do JavaScript closures work? "Reality" of EM waves vs. wavefunction of individual photons - why not treat the wave function as equally "Real"? In thinking how to ask this question (somewhat) succinctly, I keep coming back to a Microwave Oven.  A Microwave Oven has a grid of holes over the window specifically designed to be smaller in diameter than the wavelength of the microwaves it produces, yet larger than the wavelengths of the visible light spectrum - this is so you can watch your food being heated without getting an eye full of microwaves.  The "realness" of electromagnetic waves seems indisputable - both from the microwave example above, and also because if I want to broadcast a radio wave with a certain wavelength, then I need to make sure I have an antenna of corresponding length to produce the wave I'm looking for.  Furthermore, we discuss and treat these waves as real, measurable "objects" that exist and can be manipulated.     Now, if I want to describe the behavior of my Microwave Oven in the framework of QM (let's pretend my oven is going to only produce 1 photon of energy corresponding to a wavelength of the microwave spectrum for simplicity) then I'll describe the behavior of that photon as a wavefunction that evolves over time and gives a probability distribution within my microwave that similarly does not allow the photon to pass through the safety grid and exit the oven cavity giving me a retinal burn.  The difference is, the wavefunction is never treated as something "real" in this description.  When the safety grid is described as working to protect you because it has holes smaller than the wavelength of the classical waves it's blocking, this is a useful description that seems to describe "real" objects/be-ables.  While it is possible to describe why an individual photon has low probability of passing through the same grid but extended physical properties such as wavelength (in space) are treated as non-real because we're dealing with a point particle and with behavior described by something we also treat as non-real (the wavefunction); it seems unclear to me why we insist this wave function which predicts behavior of physical measurements so well is somehow "non-real."    Put another way, if we have no problem treating EM waves as "Real," then why do we insist on treating the wavefunction that describes the same behavior as "unreal?"  I understand there is recent research (Eric Cavalcanti and his group for one) trying to argue this point, but as every respectable physics professor, I've ever encountered, has treated the wavefunction as an indisputably non-real mathematical tool, I needed to ask this community for an answer. In 5e's version of the flesh to stone spell, if the spell is maintained for the full minute duration, the effect (petrification) lasts until "removed".  How can this petrification be removed? How to design a command inquiring internally required packages? How do I set up shared folders in a Windows Virtualbox guest? I have installed VirtualBox OSE on Ubuntu 11.04 and Windows XP pro as the virtual machine. Now I want to have a shared folder which can be accessed on both, my host Ubuntu machine, and my WinXP guest virtual machine.  How can I do that? Catenatives followed by infinitives and gerunds Where can I find historical data on flights, specifically Delta international flights?  I need to find out about cancellations, diversions and any other flight data pertaining on particular route at a given time.  This source has to be official and stand up to legal scrutiny. What are the assumptions for applying a quantile regression model? The question has been asked (one time) on CV before, but the answer is really imprecise and does not really answer the question in my opinion.  So: What are the assumptions for estimating a linear regression model via quantile regression?  To my understanding (and as several CV users have mentioned), quantile regression does not assume any specific distribution of the error terms - does that mean that, in a time series model, autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity do not have to be accounted for?  What about the other Gauss-Markov assumptions? I would assume that the assumption of no perfect multicollinearity has to be met when applying quantile regression, but do the parameters have to be linear? The linearity assumption only has to hold for the specific quantile I would assume.  Anyways - I do not find any backup for any of my thoughts in the scientific literature and I would appreciate a comprehensive answer. Thank you! How can I make a hexagonal grill? How would I be able to create a grill of sorts found on the front of some computer cases such as this one Did spacetime start with the Big bang? Prove that $\operatorname{rank}(A) + \operatorname{rank}(B) \ge \operatorname{rank}(A + B)$ Let $A,B$ be matrices $m\times n$ $(A, B \in M_{m\times n}(R))$. How can we prove that $$\operatorname{rank}(A+ B) \le \operatorname{rank}(A) + \operatorname{rank}(B)\ ?$$ Charge controller for Li-ion or Li-Polymer battery I am trying to work out the good charger for Mobile phones, which can serve as good performer for various smart phones out there in market these days &amp; mostly using Li-ion battery. Charging has 4 stages -- "the initial trickle-charging, then constant current charging, then constant voltage charging &amp; finaly Top-up charge" -- all this is controlled &amp; monitored by a control circuit/IC of charger. So, my concern is if such circuit/module/IC is already there in Mobile phones &amp; taking care of all protections to battery/phone including overheating during charge OR The charger designer have to incorporate these circuits in Charger itself? If former case, that means we just need to make a charging source giving ample current &amp; 4.75V-5.25V voltage, like a high-powered USB output port would gives. My feeling is such stages-wise charging &amp; control/monitor circuitry is already within the phone set, i just want to reconfirm. How does the British-Irish Visa Scheme (BIVS) work? Why isn't there a centre of charge? When determining the gravitational attraction between 2 solid bodies, we can simplify computations by taking their masses to be concentrated at their respective centres of mass. However, had they been electrically charged bodies and we needed to compute electrostatic attraction, there is no "centre of charge" notion available to us. ( We would evaluate a 2-dimensional integral, or equivalently, apply Gauss's law. )  Is there any simple reason for the absence of such a centre of charge? Frequently, I've got the answer: "charge just doesn't work that way". Equation for a smooth staircase function I am looking for a smooth staircase equation $f(h,w,x)$ that is a function of the step height $h$, step width $w$ in the range $x$.   I cannot use the unit step or other similar functions since they are just one step. I have been experimenting with various sigmoid curves and while I can get a single smooth step I cannot get to realize the staircase shape. The closest staircase function I have found is given in  in equation (18) and depicted in Fig. 4 and it is a close example of what I want (i.e generate a staircase in the range $x$ for arbitrary step heights and widths) but it is not smooth at all.  Regarding smooth steps, a likely starting point I found is  but it gives a smooth function of just a single step. I have been unable to modify the equation to make it into a staircase. I would like to specify arbitrary step heights and widths and generate a smooth staircase in the range $x$ specified.    Edit (Extra info): The smooth function I mention above has the problem that the upper, horizontal line is not equal in length to the lower, horizontal line which is why I have been unable to adapt it into a staircase function   Edit 2 Including some pictures     Edit 2 Plot of $s$ with a steep slope showing a different width on the first horizontal line How to encrypt folders (not in Home)? Is there a way to encrypt a folder, which is not in Home (/home/user/) but even in a different partition, so only my user can access/read contained files?  Alternatively, I would like to understand if it is possible to turn a complete ext4 partition into an encrypted volume, which would be mounted at user login.  If possible, I would like to make the change without reinstalling Ubuntu.  My PC has (mount output):  /dev/sda1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro) /dev/sda3 on /home type ext4 (rw) /dev/sda4 on /home/igor/Personale type ext4 (rw)   sda4 is the partition containing folders I would like to protect.