Reset iPhone and can’t get it to unlock
How can I bypass Activation Lock?
Override a method at instance level I'm running Apache2 in a docker container, and want to write nothing to the disk, writing logs to stdout and stderr. I've seen a few different ways to do this (,  ) but these seem like hacks. Is there no way to do this by default?   To be clear, I do not want to tail the log, since that will result in things being written to the disk in the container. When light waves enter a medium of higher refractive index than the previous, why is it that:  Its wavelength decreases? The frequency of it has to stay the same? Git is automatically merging changes from a different branch to master If a run the watch command containing an alias, it will not expand the alias. I have tried both with single quote and double quotes, in fact given the following alias:  # alias ll alias ll='ls -l --color=tty'   The following command will fail  # watch ll sh: ll: command not found   Shouldn't command line expansion work in this case? Can we use an Android phone as a Wi-Fi repeater? Can we use an Android phone as a Wi-Fi repeater?  Imagine situation when you can access a weak Wi-Fi signal from a free hotspot (coffee shop) signal near window, but want to work in the middle of the room. Then we can put the phone on the window sill to spread the signal over the entire home.  Is it feasible? I am asked to solve this ODE: $$yy''-y'y^2-(y')^2=0.$$ Can I get some guidelines on how I can solve it? I am not sure how to approach without initial conditions. My wife wants a 4th baby, but I don't.  We have been talking about it for the last few days (talking strongly).   I have raised points such as:   We will get less time to spend with our current kids. The age gap between the first and the last will be too wide. It will cost more money. She will be out of work longer. We will need a bigger house. And we don't even have our own house yet (we are still renting). We will have to start again. Sleepless nights, nappies, feeding, new cot, car seat, etc etc.   She says:   She feels like she is missing something. She has always wanted a large family. Things will be the same regardless of having 3, or 4 kids. She agrees that money will be tighter, but wants to push through it.   Our current kids are 9 months, 2 years, and 4 years. We are young married couple (25), and I have a fairly decent job.  What would be the pros and cons of having another child?   How can we rationally talk to the other about having/or not having another child?  And what should we do if we cannot agree? I am downloading macOS Sierra from Mac App Store. But I have electricity problem here. Due to which my iMac will lose power after 2 hours. Now I want to pause the downloading so that I can resume the download later on. How can I do that?  Here is a screenshot. I have made a script that will sort files according to their extension and place them in the proper folder. For example, place abc.jpg in the directory jpg.  #!/bin/bash #this script sorts files according to their extensions oldIFS=$IFS IFS=$'\n' (find . -type f) &gt; /tmp/temp for var in `cat /tmp/temp` do name=`basename "$var"` ext=`echo $name | cut -d'.' -f2- | cut -d'.' -f2- | cut -d'.' -f2- | cut -d'.' -f2- | cut -d'.' -f2- | cut -d'.' -f2- | cut -d'.' -f2-` mkdir -p $ext mv "$var" $ext/ 2&gt; /dev/null done IFS=$oldIFS   problem with this script:    it involves use of IFS, it is said to avoid use of IFS, as much as possible it does not sorts file without file extensions  it will sort files like abc.tar.bz in folder named bz, but however such a file should go in tar.bz folder see line 9 of my script; if any file contain more no. of dots(in its name) than no. of cut -d'.' -f2- in the script than if will result in file name taken in extension part. for example, a file named i.am.live.in.india.and.i.study.computer.science.txt will be placed in folder named study.computer.science.txt   you may also suggest any tweaks to make this script more smaller and neat. lim sup inequality $\limsup ( a_n b_n ) \leq \limsup a_n \limsup b_n $ I´m not sure how to start with this proof, how can I do it? $$ \limsup ( a_n b_n ) \leqslant \limsup a_n \limsup b_n  $$ I also have to prove, if $ \lim a_n $ exists then: $$ \limsup ( a_n b_n  ) = \limsup a_n \limsup b_n  $$ Help please, it´s not a homework I want to learn. Sphere inside a conical vessel touches the lid I'm trying to write a basic program in C using gedit or sublime text (which I prefer), but no matter what I do when I try to compile or run, or even while writing, I have no option to use 'stdio.h' or any similar package. Even when I start typing #include &lt;st the only word completion sublime suggests is 'struct'.  I've read dozens of threads, but all managed to fix this by installing gcc, which I've tried to reinstall multiple times, with no luck.  This is the output from gcc -v:  Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/lto-wrapper OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1 Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 7.2.0-8ubuntu3' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-7/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-7 --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-libmpx --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --with-target-system-zlib --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 7.2.0 (Ubuntu 7.2.0-8ubuntu3) `   This is the code:   #include &lt;stdio.h&gt;  int main(void) { printf("hello, world\n"); }   When I compile using gcc, I get nothing, no error at least. but when I try to run using just ./hello.c this is what I get. How to check who owns the Slack's workspace? I'd like to check who owns (or at least some kind of public profile page) some workspace based on its subdomain (e.g. xyz.slack.com).  Is it possible? Proof of relation between divided difference and interpolation polynomial coefficient Given data points $\{(x_i,f(x_i)\}_{i=0}^{m}$, if we define divided difference recursively as: $$f[x_0,\cdots,x_{k+1}] = \frac{f[x_1,\cdots,x_{k+1}]-f[x_0,\cdots,x_k]}{x_{k+1}-x_0} \text{ with the definition that} f[x_0] = f(x_0)$$ then it is true that the unique interpolating polynomial $L_m(x)$ of degree $m$ such that $L_m(x_i) = f(x_i)$ for all $i = 0\cdots m$ is given by: $$ L_m(x) = \sum_{k=0}^mf[x_0,\cdots,x_k]\omega_k(x), \text{ where } \omega_k(x) = \prod_{i=0}^{k-1}(x-x_i). $$ The question asks to show this. That is, show the coefficients of the interpolating polynomial of degree $m$ in the basis $\{\omega_k\}_{k=0}^{m}$ is exactly $a_k = f[x_0,\cdots,x_k]$, the divided differences. To tackle this problem, I've attempted to use induction. The base step is trivial as $a_0 = f(x_0)$, but I am stuck on the inductive step. I supposed the degree $m$ interpolating polynomial of some data $\{(x_i,f(x_i)\}_{i=0}^{m}$ is indeed given by: $$ L_m(x) = \sum_{k=0}^mf[x_0,\cdots,x_k]\omega_k(x) $$ and I want to argue that $L_{m+1}(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{m+1}f[x_0,\cdots,x_k]\omega_k(x)$ is the interpolating polynomial of degree $m+1$ interpolating $\{(x_i,f(x_i)\}_{i=0}^{m+1}$, with any additional point $(x_{m+1},f(x_{m+1}))$ added. Clearly, $L_{m+1}(x)$ interpolates $\{(x_i,f(x_i)\}_{i=0}^{m}$ by definition of the $\omega_k$'s, but I am stuck at showing $L_{m+1}(x_{m+1}) = f(x_{m+1})$. Hints will be extremely appreciated! Control Android with broken screen from PC I accidentally discovered () that a closing square bracket within an optional argument delimited by [ ] can cause problems.  Here is example code illustrating the issue:  \documentclass{article}   \begin{document}  \tableofcontents  \section[Square brackets ([ and ])]{Square brackets: [ and ]} % bad: the TOC now has "Square brackets ([ and", and the actual title is a mere ")".  Some text.  \section[{Square brackets ([ and ])}]{Square brackets: [ and ]} % good (works as originally intended)  Some text.  \end{document}   The text to be used as the optional (as well as the non-optional) argument contains a ], and this character is not supposed to function as the optional argument terminator but as a matching square bracket/parenthesis. Perhaps this is as it should be, but the question is how to best circumvent any potential problems. Enclosing this in a group works, but I don't know whether doing this has other side effects (perhaps not here in the case of \section but hopefully someone else has a better example of where grouping could lead to a problem). There is no (obvious) way other than writing [{ }] because [ and ] are not normally escaped. That [ and ] are normal characters and bear syntactic function (as optional argument delimiters) creates this potentially problematic situation.  Is simply enclosing the entire optional argument in a group ({ }) a good solution? Are there other/better ways? How are percentiles calculated in Careers 2.0? I noticed that a percentile is placed at the top of my resume in Careers 2.0.    How are these percentiles calculated? Is there a certain threshold you need to be over in order for it to be displayed? How do I fix gaps around my lean-to greenhouse? How does gravity escape a black hole? My understanding is that light can not escape from within a black hole (within the event horizon).  I've also heard that information cannot propagate faster than the speed of light.  It would seem to me that the gravitational attraction caused by a black hole carries information about the amount of mass within the black hole.  So, how does this information escape?  Looking at it from a particle point of view: do the gravitons (should they exist) travel faster than the photons?