Could a Schengen visa refusal be because of cancelled accommodation?
Schengen Visa Refusal: Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not reliable
Mounting Flashdrive - mounted to home directory I wanted to mount my flashdrive, and made the mistake of setting the mount path as /home/my_name. Now all of my documents, downloads, pictures, etc. are unavailable since my flashdrive has replaced my previous home folder.  When I go to terminal and type sudo umount /home/my_name I get the error message:   umount: /home/my_name: device is busy.         (In some cases useful info about processes that use          the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))   Is there a way to fix this, where I can restore my old /home/my_name folder and then mount the flashdrive to a proper location? GUI/Unity crashing in 16.04 LTS after updates 2018-01-04, compiz segfaults The latest updates (4/1/2018) make my laptop constantly crash the GUI/Unity:  (Intel Pentium su4100 processor)  syslog:  Jan  5 11:38:53 1810 kernel: [ 1850.327738] compiz[11911]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f6c7baf0c16 sp 00007ffd5ec71c60 error 4 in i965_dri.so[7f6c7b513000+82d000]   After login I end up with an empty desktop, just a wallpaper, GUI/Unity are in a crash loop:   No panel.  No dash.  Can't start a program. Launcher disappears. Sidebar disappears. System crash. Windows key not working. The key combination Alt+Tab not working.   Simply, the computer is not usable. Same for guest login. The only thing working: open up a terminal CTRL+ALT+T to examine log files.  I somehow forced  to let me log in and file the bug, but still lots of problems:   Dash not working Alt+Tab not working Sometimes windows all disappear for a few seconds     Any ideas for a solution or workaround?   UPDATE     If you have the same/ very similar problems, follow the link to my    report and mark there that you're affected too. Or file your own. Please leave a comment   if you wish, or upvote - this is a nasty problem - but an answer should   offer a fix or a workaround so users can use their computer again.    Without , Ubuntu can't fix issues. I am trying to use mathematical induction to prove  $$(2n)!\ge2^n(n!)^2\quad\text{for }n\in\mathbb{N}$$  I am stuck at the $n=k+1$ point. In general, in most places, it is said that using TeX defaults is the best. However, TeX does provide things like \, and \quad etc. When one should use them? Both in general and in math mode in particular. How do I clear Bash's cache of paths to executables? I'm not sure how to prove these basic theorems in propositional calculus. Instead of using the standard axioms, we're supposed to use:   Deduction Theorem (if $\Phi, \alpha \vdash \beta$ then $\Phi \vdash \alpha \to \beta$),  Reductio (if $\Phi, \alpha \vdash \, $, then $\Phi \vdash \lnot \alpha$), Cut Rule (if $\Phi \vdash \alpha$ and $\Psi, \alpha \vdash \beta$ then $\Phi \cup \Psi \vdash \beta$),  Inconsistency Effect (if $\Phi \vdash \, $, then $\Phi \vdash \beta$ for every formula $\beta$), and  the Principle of Indirect Proof (if $\Phi, \lnot \alpha \vdash \, $, then $\Phi \vdash \alpha$),    as all the axioms can be deduced using these theorems.  I don't really know how to start the proofs without using the axioms:  i) prove that $\lnot(\alpha \to \beta) ⊢ \alpha$  ii) prove that $\lnot\alpha \vdash \alpha \to \beta$  Any suggestions on how to start these proofs or any insight at all would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks! Can anyone come up with an explicit example of two functions $f$ and $g$ such that: $f\circ g$ is bijective, but neither $f$ nor $g$ is bijective?  I tried the following: $$f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R^{+}} $$ $$f(x)=x^{2}$$  and  $$g:\mathbb{R^{+}}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$$ $$g(x)=\sqrt{x}$$  $f$ is not injective, and $g$ is not surjective, but $f\circ g$ is bijective  Any other examples? Is there anything in the physics that enforces the wave function to be $C^2$? Are weak solutions to the Schroedinger equation physical? I am reading the beginning chapters of Griffiths and he doesn't mention anything. Showing that $\frac{z^n}{1+z^{2n}}$ is real for $|z|=1$. Why is find not accepting '-exec cp {} dir +'? I have a directory, dir1 which contains many files whose names end in either .jpg or .png. I want to copy all the .png files to dir2 which is empty.  This command works:  find dir1 -name '*.png' -exec cp {} dir2 \;   but this command doesn't:  find dir1 -name '*.png' -exec cp {} dir2 + find: missing argument to `-exec'   I also tried:  find dir1 -name '*.png' -exec cp {} -t dir2 + find: missing argument to `-exec'   and:  find dir1 -name '*.png' -exec cp {} dir2 \+ find: missing argument to `-exec'   After looking at , I even tried:  find dir1 -name '*.png' -exec cp {} dir2 {} + find: Only one instance of {} is supported with -exec ... +    says that:     -exec {} + was added in [version] 4.2.12 in 2005   My version of find is 4.4.2.  What am I doing wrong? Creating files in C++ Answer draft is lost if you click to sign up When writing an answer on a site where you don't have an account or are not logged in, below the answer entry textbox are options to create an account or continue as guest by providing a nickname and email. I had written an answer of several paragraphs on a network site, clicked &quot;Sign up with Google&quot; (resulting in association to my existing network-wide profile) but after doing so instead of showing my answer to be posted, only the first five or six words were retained.  I know that I had no account on this site previously because I just received the association bonus... I cannot tell whether the bug also affects totally new users or those with accounts but who are not logged in. This is a very unwelcoming user experience.  Please fix it. If the intended workflow is to click &quot;Post Answer&quot; first and associate the account afterwards, then the sign up options should not be shown until the answer is posted, and certainly not above the Post Answer button. This problem also occurs if you already have an account on the site, and click 'sign up with google' (which allows you to successfully log in). Why is the subject omitted in sentences like "Thought you'd never ask"? "Thought you'd never ask" is "I thought you'd never ask" with "I" omitted. "Hope this helps" is "I hope this helps" with "I" omitted.   In English grammar, normally every sentence should have a subject, right?   My first thought is that these two examples are so often used that they are like set phrases. But these are not really set phrases. You can alter the words after "thought" and "hope".  Another possible explanation is the tendency to drop the subject if it is the first person pronoun. It seems that in many languages, such as Spanish, Italian and Japanese, the first person subject is usually omitted. Maybe English is going the same way? (Not exactly the same, since in Italian, verb forms change according to the person, so the subject is not necessary to understand who one's referring to.)  And, apparently, such omission is more common in spoken English than in written English.  Are there more examples of such first person subject omission? How frequent is it? Need help disabling imessage? I recently changed from iphone to android and i have been having trouble recieving messages from my iphone friends since my iphones screen is broken i cant do anything on it. Any way to fix this problem through icloud or something? Outline around text on CMYK black background in Photoshop I'm trying to make a document with one color black  (c:0,m:0,y:0,k:100) background with red text on it. However in CMYK the text has this weird grey white-ish edge. In RGB it doesn't show but in CMYK it shows. I'm wondering will this show when printing or do I need to use different methods? ie. using rich black etc.  Here's the RGB and CMYK comparison How many integer solutions does $xy+9(x+y)=2006$ have? Here $x$ and $y$ are both integers.  My trying:        I have tried to solve this problem. But I have no idea to solve this. Please help I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this question. I realise that this maybe a borderline philosophical question at this point in time, therefore feel free to close this question if you think that this is a duplicate or inappropriate for this forum. Anyway, I'm an electrical engineer and I have some basic knowledge of quantum mechanics. I know that Schrödinger's equation is deterministic. However, quantum mechanics is much deeper than that and I would like to learn more. If this question is not clearly answerable at this point than can anyone point out some recognized sources that try to answer this question. I would appreciate it if the source is scientific and more specifically, is related to quantum theory. Centering figure captions in IEEEtran I am working on a paper using the IEEEtran template in LyX.  I have run into a problem: While the contents (in this case, a table) of the figure float are centered, the caption is aligned to the left (see screenshot below). How can I center the caption as well?    This is generated by the following LyX document:    What I've tried:   Center the table (the table is centered) Center all the contents in the float (only the table is centered) Select the caption and center it (no effect)   Technical details:   LyX 2.0.5.1 Mac OS X 10.7.5 (Lion) All centering was performed by Right Click>Paragraph Settings>Align: Center Heartbleed: What is it and what are options to mitigate it? Why we use $L_2$ Space In QM? I asked this question for many people/professors without getting a sufficient answer, why in QM Lebesgue spaces of second degree are assumed to be the one that corresponds to the Hilbert vector space of state functions, from where this arises? and why 2-order space that assumes the following inner product:  $\langle\phi|\psi\rangle =\int\phi^{*}\psi\,dx$  While there is many ways to define the inner product.  In Physics books, this always assumed as given, never explains it, also I tried to read some abstract math books on this things, and found some concepts like "Metric weight" that will be minimized in such spaces, even so I don't really understand what is behind that, so why $L_2$? what special about them? Who and how physicists understood that those are the one we need to use?