Why doesn't run this loop over all my list?
List of lists changes reflected across sublists unexpectedly
What version of Ubuntu should I pick? I'm just a simple user frustrated with Windows 10 and I want to leave Windows altogether.  However, I don't want to spend three weeks learning how to install the new system and then get all my current programs to work.  I am not setting up a server, I am not a developer and I do not want all my stuff on a cloud. Show that $2730\mid n^{13}-n,\;\;\forall n\in\mathbb{N}$   I tried, $2730=13\cdot5\cdot7\cdot3\cdot2$  We have $13\mid n^{13}-n$, by Fermat's Little Theorem.  We have $2\mid n^{13}-n$, by if $n$ even then $n^{13}-n$ too is even; if $n$ is odd $n^{13}-n$ is odd.  And the numbers $5$ and $7$, how to proceed? Is there a way to disable file:/// protocol in google chrome?  Is there some option, or some switches that can disable this feature?  Please help Ambiguity in Negation: "John did not come because of the rain" $n$-th digit in the sequence of natural numbers What's the $n$-th digit in the sequence $S$ of numbers formed by the natural numbers, i.e.,  $n$-th digit in the sequence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12... ? For example 11th digit in the sequence is 0. Yesterday, my laptop caught a virus which caused massive damage. Since them, I have been trying to recover important files before reformatting my computer, a task the virus has not made easy.   Restoration points predating the attack have been deleted.  Most of my folders show empty.  My Start menu is essentially empty, with the exception of Trillian and Mirror's Edge. The same goes for my Desktop, which only has programs which were installed after the attack.  Searching for files through my computer is pretty much useless, as it only rarely brings up anything. I suspect most of my files have not been deleted. While my folders show empty, uTorrent still does display them and I can open them from here. Unfortunately, when I select Open Containing Folder, the folder still shows as completely empty even if I'm currently watching a video from that very folder. Further adding evidence to the not-deleted-just-missing theory, the data recovery software I'm using (Restoration) cannot find only find an handful of the missing files.   If they were deleted, I could do a forensic recovery to get them back but since they're probably still somewhere on my computer, just out out of my reach, I can't find them.   Under those circumstances, is there a way I can recover those files? Rolle's Theorem and the Mean Value Theorem Let $f\colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ have derivatives of all orders. Suppose that $a &lt; b$ and that $f(a)=f(b)=f'(a)=f'(b) =0$. Prove that $f'''(c) = 0$ for some $c$ in $(a,b)$. Attorney at law, is there any other kind? I have wondered from time to time about the phrase "attorney at law." Are there other kinds of attorneys? Attorneys at arms? If not, why do we specify? Modify obj after import using python I am trying to modify an object after importing it. This post is related to   import bpy full_path_to_file = "C:\\Users\\xyz\\Documents\\test.obj" bpy.ops.import_scene.obj(filepath=full_path_to_file) # create the material mat = bpy.data.materials.new('MaterialName') mat.diffuse_color = (1.0,0.0,1.0) mat.diffuse_shader = 'LAMBERT' mat.diffuse_intensity = 1.0  # get the object obj = bpy.data.objects['Cube']  # get the material mat = bpy.data.materials['MaterialName']  # assign material to object obj.data.materials.append(mat)   I wanted to add a material to the imported object but that is not happening. So I tried to scale it even that is not happening.  I realized that no operation is being performed on the imported objects. But the same operations are executing on the objects that are created (i.e. not imported).  Any help would be appreciated. Institute Name in @masterthesis Citations I need to cite master thesis and the lecture notes into a document. But the problem with @masterthesis and @unpublished citations is they don't print an institution name in the pdflatex output of bibliography.   `\documentclass{article}   \usepackage{filecontents}  \usepackage[ backend=biber, style=numeric, sortlocale=de_DE, natbib=true, url=true,  doi=true, eprint=false ]{biblatex} \addbibresource{bibliography.bib}  \begin{filecontents}{bibliography.bib} @masterthesis{bhgt, title={Bike Model}, author={Fris}, year={2016}, school={University A}, address={XXX} } @unpublished{Map, title = {Electrical Engineering Book}, author={Koch}, howpublished = {Lecture Notes}, Institution= {University B}, year = {2015} } } \end{filecontents}  \begin{document}  Citation Test:  \cite{bhgt} and \cite{Map} \printbibliography  \end{document}`   I get this bibliography output:         [1] Fris. Bike Model. XXX, 2016.   [2] Koch. “Electrical Engineering Book”. Lecture Notes. 2015.       Any suggestions, how we can also print an institute name? Rich Wizards, Poor Muggles Why, oh why, don't the Weasleys "conjure" up some diamonds/gold/etc, sell 'em to Muggles, and get rich? They could buy a mansion (like the Malfoys), and live there happily ever after.  I know there's  that prohibits one from conjuring food (which doesn't make much sense to me, either). Even if it applied to gold, what about all the other elements/compounds/materials? Could the law really be 'don't let a wizard conjure something if it'll make them richer'? That's totally nonsensical.  Why does Wizard society still have poor people, especially if they're talented? Who is allowed to invite people to a Minecraft Realm? Why some dragon claw doors do not open? Why on the first page Google says there are thousands of results but on the last page there are less than a hundred? Calculate the uncertainty in velocity of electron I got this question in one of my periodic test in coaching, I (seemingly) solved the question but later recognised what mess I did.  So, the question is :      Calculate the uncertainty in velocity of an electron. If the uncertainty in its position is ${10^ {-15}} \; \mathrm m$.   By simple calculations one can see that the answer would be ${5.79\times{10^{10}}} \; \mathrm{m/s}$. However, as one can see, the uncertainty in velocity is greater than the velocity of light then how is that possible or there is some other way to handle such problems.  P.S. I know the concept of dynamic mass but I am not very familiar with it. (I think that would work here, but don't know how?) I have a problem with this limit, I don't know what method to use. I have no idea how to compute it. Is it possible to compute this limit with the McLaurin expansion? Can you explain the method and the steps used? Thanks. (I prefer to avoid to use L'Hospital's rule.)  $$\lim _{x\to 0}\frac{x\bigl(\sqrt{3e^x+e^{3x^2}}-2\bigr)}{4-(\cos x+1)^2}$$ Lately, I've seen many search results in the form of https://stackoverflow.com/q/&lt;id&gt; and /a/&lt;id&gt; on Google. Why do I see these slug-less permalinks instead of the full URL?  For instance, a search for  gives  instead of :        For the record, it seems that Google has indexed  and . Emmy Noether's theorem in simpler terms I'd like to understand  and its contents as to what it implies in a bit simpler terms. I am familiar with mathematics unto Calculus 1,2,3 and some linear algebra and group theory. I am familiar with that for each symmetry there is a conservation law.    Now is there a one-one correspondence between these two always? What about laws like conservation of charge?  And conservation of energy?  And conservation of mass?  Considering our view of nature was changed as Special Relativity was introduced and thus, what earlier the theorem would have asserted as mass and energy to be originating from different symmetries then how did we reconcile these two as just one symmetry? Arrays in Unix Bourne Shell I am trying to use arrays in Bourne shell (/bin/sh). I found that the way to initialize array elements is:  arr=(1 2 3)   But it is encountering an error:  syntax error at line 8: `arr=' unexpected   Now the post where I found this syntax says it is for bash, but I could not find any separate syntax for Bourne shell. Does the syntax stand the same for /bin/sh as well? Quite often, the phrase "x for x's sake" is used in English, and so one could describe someone as being "argumentative for argument's sake" to describe someone who is arguing for the sake of arguing.  However, is there an adjective that means the same thing?  For example, it could be used in the context:     I don't want to be [X], but [argument...]   ... indicating that your argument is necessary and not intended to irritate.