Exisiting Tree Library in Java?
How to implement a tree data-structure in Java?
How can I embed a view inside a content of a node in Drupal 8?   I found something similar, for example in the question about "" or the  module, but it is all for Drupal 7.  I tried with an Entity reference field pointing to a View but it display only a label and from the Manage Display tab I can choose only from Label and Entity ID. I need something like the "Rendered entity" option that is present on Entity reference fields pointing to other nodes. I'm examining a part of my dataset containing 46840 double values ranging from 1 to 1690 grouped in two groups. In order to analyze the differences between these groups I started by examining the distribution of the values in order to pick the right test.  Following a guide on testing for normality, I did a qqplot, histogram &amp; boxplot.       This doesn't seem to be a normal distribution. Since the guide states somewhat correctly that a purely graphical examination isn't sufficient I also want to test the distribution for normality.   Considering the size of the dataset and the limitation of the shapiro-wilks test in R , how should the given distribution be tested for normality and considering the size of the dataset, is this even reliable? ()  Edit:  The limitation of the Shapiro-Wilk test I'm referring to is that the dataset to be tested is limited to 5000 points.  To cite  concerning this topic:     An additional issue with the Shapiro-Wilk's test is that when you feed   it more data, the chances of the null hypothesis being rejected   becomes larger. So what happens is that for large amounts of data even   very small deviations from normality can be detected, leading to   rejection of the null hypothesis event hough for practical purposes   the data is more than normal enough.      [...] Luckily shapiro.test protects the user from the above described   effect by limiting the data size to 5000.   As to why I am testing for normal distribution in the first place:  Some hypothesis tests assume normal distribution of the data. I want to know whether or not I can use these tests. "Die from cancer" vs. "die of cancer" Is there a difference between those expressions: "Die from cancer" or "Die of cancer"? Are they both correct? In the Wikipedia article , it says     After Newtonian gravitation was found to be inconsistent with special relativity, . . .   I don't see how Newtonian gravitation itself is inconsistent with special relativity.  After all, Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation is completley analogous to Coulomb's Law, so it would seem that, if there were an analogous "gravitational magnetic field", one could formulate a theory of gravitation in exact analogy with Maxwell's Theory of Electromagnetism, and of course, this would automatically be consistent with Special Relativity.  What about this approach to gravitation does not work?  The only problem I could see with this is the lack of evidence for a "gravitational magnetic field".  That being said, gravity is "weak" as it is, and my guess is that it would be extremely difficult to set up an experiment in which a massive body were moving fast enough for this "magnetic field effect" to be obsevable.  EDIT:  As has been pointed out to me in the answers, Newton itself is inconsistent with SR.  Similarly, however, so is Coulomb's Law, yet, electromagnetism is still consistent with SR.  Thus, how do we know that it is not the case that Newton's Law is the special "static" case of a more general gravitomagnetic theory exactly analogous to Maxwell's Theory:  Let $\mathbf{G}$ be the gravitation field, let $\rho$ be the mass density, and $\mathbf{J}$ be the mass current density, let $\gamma _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{4\pi \gamma _0}=G$, the Universal Gravitation Constant, let $\nu _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{\gamma _0\nu _0}}=c$, and suppose there exists a field $\mathbf{M}$, the gravitomagnetic field, so that the following equations hold: $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\rho}{\gamma _0} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{M}=0 $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{M}=\nu _0\mathbf{J}+\gamma _0\nu _0\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t} $$ where theses fields would produce on a mass $m$ moving with velocity $\mathbf{v}$ in our inertial frame the Lorentz force $\mathbf{F}=m\left( \mathbf{G}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{M}\right)$.  This theory would automatically be consistent with SR and would reduce to Newton's Law of Gravitation for the case of gravitostatics:  $\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t}=\mathbf{J}=0$.  (To be clear, you can't just set the time derivatives equal to $\mathbf{0}$ as it seems I have done.  Upon doing so, you obtain the corresponding static theory, which is technically incorrect (as you can easily see because it won't be relativistically invariant), but is nevertheless often a useful approximation.)  My question can thus be phrased as:  without appealing directly to GR, what is wrong with this theory? How can I stop certain apps from appearing in the Dash? Get in vs. get on Possible Duplicate:          I'm an EFL (English as a foreign language) teacher and I haven't been able to come up with a good principle for which preposition to use after get when referring to transportation.  Some examples:   Get in:   a car/taxi/van/truck, etc.  Get on:   a bus/plane/bike/truck, etc.    How can one choose whether to use in or on? Note that in some cases, such as the example with truck, either preposition is possible but the choice affects the meaning.  I've been telling my students that there is no rule, so they just have to memorize which preposition to use, but I'm really hoping I'm wrong.  This question would be better suited for the upcoming  Stack Exchange, but it hasn't entered beta yet. More . How to set system-wide environment variables on OS X Mavericks SELECT permission on view querying table from another database Permissions problems with /var/www/html and my own home directory for a website document root I'm trying to not give 777 permission in my /var/www/html folder, but I want to edit my files without sudo. So I though in create a symlink of a folder in my home directory within /var/www/html. I created it using sudo ln -sT /home/andre/www/moodle/ moodle , and the ls -la output is this:  andre@andre-270E5G:/var/www/html$ ls -la total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mai  4 10:20 . drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Abr 29 14:29 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   23 Mai  4 10:20 moodle -&gt; /home/andre/www/moodle/   So, my moodle folder has read, write and execute permissions for everyone, and thats not what I want. I used the command sudo chmod -R 775 moodle/ trying to change it, but it stayed with read, write and execute permissions to all. I tried the same with the moodle folder in /home/andre/www/moodle, but it stayed the same. The output of ls -la in /home/andre/www/ is:  andre@andre-270E5G:~/www$ ls -la total 28 drwxrwxr-x  3 andre andre  4096 Mai  4 10:02 . drwx------ 49 andre andre 20480 Mai  4 10:01 .. drwxrwxr-x 41 andre andre  4096 Mai  4 10:02 moodle   So the folder moodle in /home/andre/www/ has the permissions I want.  As an additional problem, when I access localhost/moodle I get 403 Forbidden error.  What am I doing wrong here? Fitting linear model / ANOVA by group Profile page "activity" tab is broken At some point in time (about a week ago) something happened to my Motorola Moto Z2 Play / Android 8.0 that caused my base apps to not have access to my media files (i.e. audio, photos etc.). Examples:  all my custom ringtones (i.e. based on my own media files) were reset to default sound:  Contact apps reset custom ringtones for contacts to default one, Alarms &amp; Clock app reset custom alarm tone to default one, SMS (Messages) app reset custom message notification tone to default one, system-wide default notification tone (set by me to custom) was reset as well, system-wide default ringtone (set by me to custom one) was reset,    because my contacts app keeps saying: &quot;No pictures are available on the device&quot;.  While first situation is resolved. I see my custom ringtone files in the list and I can go through my contacts and assign them again. But second situation is not resolved. I see this error all the time and I cannot change any contact's photo. This is verified as not a bug (tested three different contacts-like applications and all of them shows exactly the same message, when trying to change contact's photo). But still, it seems that problem is limited to contacts-related apps only. Other apps still has read and write access to my custom files. For example: :  (read) I can pick any photo or other custom file and attach it to an e-mail, send it as MMS or share it in any other way or (read) upload it to OneDrive or Google Drive etc. or (write) my Camera app is still able to make new photos and store them in &quot;DCIM&quot; or (write) my sound recorder is able to record sound and write audio files.  The only thing that has changed on my phone recently and that I suspect as the cause of above metioned situation was Android 7.1.2 --&gt; Android 8.0.0 update. Is there anything I can do (since replacing contacts app didn't resolve the situation) or check in this case? Or resetting the phone to factory defaults is the only option that I am left with? EDIT: I have cleared cache and data of media app, as suggested in comment. It didn't help. When an account is deleted, don't auto delete its negatively scored posts on the meta site Meta is different. Negatively scored questions are not always bad questions, and sometimes they have merit and draw good answers, especially discussions.  When an account (in the main site) is deleted, either by self deletion or by a moderator, all questions with score of -1 or less are being deleted regardless of their answers, both in the main and meta site.  Can you please change this behavior so that the questions on the per-site meta will survive and won't be auto-deleted? I have been trying to install ubuntu (I tried 12.04LTS, 12.10, 12.10-secure-remix) using the wubi installer on Windows 8 and all the three times ran into the same problem showing some cannot find /ubuntu/winboot/wubildr when I tried to start ubuntu.  I tried to change the boot settings from UEFI to Legacy and then my laptop restarted and showed that "No operating System Found".  I then tried to install Ubuntu using a cd and after a lot of effort and using boot repair,etc. I landed into a new trouble. When I select UEFI on, the laptop loads Windows and windows too does not detect ubuntu. When I select Legacy mode, it starts ubuntu, shows me an option to start windows 8 but gives an error showing windows failed to load.  So in legacy mode, i am able to use only ubuntu and in UEFI mode, I am able to use only Win8. Please explain any process of starting windows in legacy mode (which I tried without any success) or starting ubuntu in UEFI mode. Algorithm to match one input file with given numbers of file What finite groups always have a square root for each element? I'm really interested in quantum theory and would like to learn all that I can about it. I've followed a few tutorials and read a few books but none satisfied me completely. I'm looking for introductions for beginners which do not depend heavily on linear algebra or calculus, or which provide a soft introduction for the requisite mathematics as they go along.  What are good introductory guides to QM along these lines? It's using Euclidian inverse. Can you show it step by step?   $$N=7, q=11, a = 3+2X^2 -3X^4 +X^6$$  the inverse of $a \pmod {11}$ is  $$A=-2+4X+2X^2 +4X^3 -4X^4 +2X^5 -2X^6$$  How do we compute $A$? I am interested in the situation where you have a very interesting result. For instance, you have solved a very important open problem. However, you are not known in the field and do not have any remarkable publications. Your supervisor thinks the work is good and you submit the work to a high profile journal, but you get rejected.  The thing is that the contribution is very strong. It breaks what most people believe or what they have already proven: e.g., you solve the P vs. NP problem or any other well known open problem.   The reviewers strongly reject your work with no justification and they do not state why the result is wrong. Examples of reviewer comments include:   "The proof must be wrong."  "You cannot achieve such a result."  "You do not understand well the notion of ..."   My question is what to do in this situation? Where to go? If your advisor accepts the work, but the reviewers from the top journal reject the work without even explaining the mistakes,  what should you do? Compound literals in MSVC