Travelling to the UK on an accompanied visa, unaccompanied
Travel alone on accompanied visa
How to clone/copy all file/directory attributes onto different file/directory? I want to copy the attributes (ownership, group, ACL, extended attributes, etc.) of one directory to another but not the directory contents itself.  This does not work:  cp -v --attributes-only A B cp: omitting directory `A'              Note: It does not have to be cp. OSX Server: should I use Open Directory? How do I definitively show that there are only two propagating degrees of freedom in the Lorenz Gauge $\partial_\mu A^\mu=0$ in classical electrodynamics.  I need an clear argument that   involves the equations of motion for just the potentials $A^0$ and $\mathbf{A}$, and not the electric and magnetic fields.   includes sources $\rho$ and $\mathbf{J}$ in the equations of motion.  This is to justify the assertion that there are degrees of freedom that decouple from the rest of system. does not critically rely on quantum field theoretic arguments (although any supplementary remarks are welcome).     To illustrate the level of clarity I expect, I provide an argument in the Coulomb gauge $\nabla\cdot \mathbf{A} = 0$:  Of the four field degrees of freedom, the gauge condition $\nabla\cdot \mathbf{A} = 0$ removes one degree of freedom (the longitudinally polarized EM waves).  To show that among the remaining three degrees of freedom only two are propagating, consider the field equations of motion in the Coulomb gauge:  \begin{align} \nabla^2 A^0 &amp;= -\rho/\epsilon_0,\\ \big[\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}-\nabla^2\big]\mathbf{A}&amp;= \mu_0 \mathbf{J}-\nabla \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}A^0. \end{align}  The first equation is NOT a wave equation for $A^0$, and thus does not propagate.  The final equation IS a wave equation, and describes the propagation of two degrees of freedom (Gauss' law in first eq. can be solved, and then inserted into the second equation to show that $\mathbf{A}$ only couples to the Solenoidal part of the current). Exclamation(!) turned in to question mark(?) in title field I just submitted a question () with an exclamation (!) at the end of the title (with one space between the word and the exclamation) but it turned in to question mark (?).   I removed the space between the word and the exclamation, then it shows normal.   Is this an intended feature? Powering NiChrome wire from battery I'm looking to power nichrome wire from battery. The problem I ran into is that desired length/width of the wire has very small resistance ~ 8 Ohm.  Several kinds of batteries I've tested have internal resistance much higher then that, which leads to wire staying cold and battery getting hot.  Is there any way to increase current drawn from the battery? Some kind of amplifier maybe?  Edit:    1.2V(rechargable) and 1.5V one, while not getting hot itself did not provide enough power to heat the wire. 3V did not provide enough power, even stacking 3 of them in series, only provided about 1V of voltage on the wire, and not enough amperage to heat the wire. 9V battery did provide enough amperage to heat the wire, but at the same time got very hot very quickly itself.   PS. I was wondering if  might work for this purpose? Where will my bus be at the Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York? I am trying to figure out how to add a Lightning Web Component to a Lightning tab.  I have it on the Home Page, but I would like it to be on its own tab.  I feel like there should be an option to expose it to the Lightning tabs.  When I am in the Tabs section, I don't see my LWC listed. How can I remove the site URL from enqueued scripts and styles? I'm dealing with an SSL issue and I would like to strip the domain from all scripts and styles being output via wp_enqueue_scripts. This would result in all scripts and styles being displayed with a relative path from the domain root.  I imagine there is a hook that I can use to fileter this, however, I am not sure which one, nor how to go about it. An electron has no known internal structure, does that imply it has an unknown one? I'm currently reading Alonso and Finn's Electromagnetism book.  It explains that the spin contributes to the magnetic moment and is somewhat comparable to a rotation of the particle around its own axis. It says that the spin of a particle is caused by a certain internal structure, which makes sense in the aforementioned analogy.  Right underneath the paragraph with the explanation of spin, it says "The electron has no known internal structure", but since it does have a spin, does that mean that we know the electron has an internal structure but we just don't know what it is? I've been playing Agar for some time now, and lately I've noticed there was a new XP system in Agar. Since then I've been wondering what variables chance the XP gained. I've tried googling it, but with no luck.  I'm looking for how the XP system works in these game modes:   FFA Teams Experimental What is the name of a squircle with three, five, six or more corners? I know that the second shape is a squircle, but what are the other shapes called? Is there an actual name for them?    The shapes do not simply have rounded corners, but the sides have a "circularity". Here is a triangle with rounded corners next to the shape that I do not know the name of:    "Trircle", "Triarcle", and "Pentircle" do not seem to be used for them, at least Google's image search does not provide any results. How To Set Default Wallpaper As Login Screen Wallpaper [Automatically]? How to get a toddler to start chewing and eating solids? My son is 18 months old and still doesn't want to chew and eat solid foods. We have to blend soups and other food into purée for him to accept it. If there is even a slight solid, he will automatically push it out of his mouth with his tongue.  I have had a breakthrough with breakfast where I don't blend as much and leave it a little chunky. He ate it but still pushed chunks of soft banana that were bigger out.  Some of my friends have kids that are 4-5 months younger, who are eating chicken cutlets.  Any ideas or proven methods for getting a child to start eating solids? Fresh Windows-10 Install A Windows-7 laptop was upgraded to Windows-10 during the Microsoft free upgrade period when they were nudging users to migrate away from 7 to 10.  The system is sluggish and crash prone: I would like create a fresh install with a new SSD from a Windows 10 install .iso burned to a USB drive.  Is it possible (and how can) the the license-key from the old drive be recovered and migrated to a fresh install?   If this is not the right question to ask, I would appreciate edits to the questions: thank you. When, where and **how often** do you find polynomials of higher degrees than two in mathematical, pure/applied, research? A formula for solving a polynomial of degree three, see  link; $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$, is  $$\begin{align} x\quad&amp;=\quad       \sqrt[3]{           \left(               \frac{-b^3}{27a^3} + \frac{bc}{6a^2} - \frac{d}{2a}           \right)            +                 \sqrt{               \left(                   \frac{-b^3}{27a^3} + \frac{bc}{6a^2} - \frac{d}{2a}               \right) ^2                 +                \left(                   \frac{c}{3a} - \frac{b^2}{9a^2}               \right) ^3            }       }\\       &amp;+\quad       \sqrt[3]{           \left(               \frac{-b^3}{27a^3} + \frac{bc}{6a^2} - \frac{d}{2a}           \right)            -                 \sqrt{               \left(                   \frac{-b^3}{27a^3} + \frac{bc}{6a^2} - \frac{d}{2a}               \right) ^2                 +                \left(                   \frac{c}{3a} - \frac{b^2}{9a^2}               \right) ^3            }       }       \;-\;\frac{b}{3a} \end{align}$$     Unlike quadratic, cubic, and quartic polynomials, the general quintic   cannot be solved algebraically in terms of a finite number of   additions, subtractions, multiplications, divisions, and root   extractions, as rigorously demonstrated by Abel (Abel's impossibility   theorem) and Galois. However, certain classes of quintic equations can   be solved [...] Source:    At levels of $5^{\text{th}}$ degree polynomials, things are starting to look really serious in my eyes. My question is:     If it is possible to not answer subjectively: When, where and how often do you find polynomials of higher degrees than two in mathematical, pure/applied, research? Custom setting Setting type not visible What is the probability that when you place 8 towers on a chess-board, none of them can beat the other. What is the probability that when you place 8 towers on a chess-board, none of them can beat the other.  Attempt: ${64 \choose 8}^{-1} \approx1$ in $4\ 400\ 000\ 000$  Correct answer: ${64 \choose 8}^{-1} \cdot 8! \approx 1$ in $9\ 000\ 000$.  I disagree with the $8!$. If there's combinations (binomial coefficient) in the denominator, why would there be permutations i.e. the order counts, in the numerator? In chapter 2 section 7 (pg 151) of Hartshorne's algebraic geometry there is an example given that talks about automorphisms of $\mathbb{P}_k^n$. In that example Hartshorne states that $\mathcal{O}(-1)$ has no global sections. However, we know that $\mathcal{O}(1)$ is generated by global sections. This is stated at the first of the section that if $\mathbb{P}_k^n = Proj k[x_0,...,x_n]$ then the $x_0,...,x_n$ give rise to global sections $x_0,...,x_n\in\Gamma(\mathbb{P}_k^n,\mathcal{O}(1))$.  I guess I don't understand this twisted structure sheaf very well, or to be honest I don't think I understand structure sheaves in general as well as I would like. The twisting part seems simple at first- you shift the grading of Proj over and then take the structure sheaf.  Admittedly I don't feel comfortable using the structure sheaf other than using the basic facts about it that Hartshorne gives when it is introduced. If anyone could give some insight as to what's going on here or how I might be able to understand this better it would be much appreciated. Thanks. Why does the amount of energy transferred depend on distance rather than time? The change in energy of an object can be determined by the work equation, where work is the change in energy:  $$ W = F \cdot d $$  I conceptualize the transfer of energy as simply a series of small "packets" of energy being transferred at every Planck length. These small "packets" of energy add up to the total energy transferred (i.e. work). I'm not sure if this conceptualization is correct, so correct me if I am wrong.  However, it makes me wonder why the amount of energy transferred is dependent on distance and not time.  $$ m_1 = 10~kg \\ m_2 = 20~kg \\ W_1 = (10~N)\cdot(5~m) = 50~J \\ W_2 = (10~N)\cdot(5~m) = 50~J \\ W_1 = W_2 \\ t_1 \neq t_2 $$  If I apply a constant force on an object, why isn't the energy transferred at a constant rate with respect to time? The energy transfer rate varies dependent on how long it takes to cover the set distance.  In other words: why is the energy transferred consistent per unit of distance, and not per unit of time? How can we print line numbers to the log in java