asking a question about software licences on Stack Overflow
Where can I ask about Software Licenses/Licensing?
Why isn't Captain America worthy of Mjolnir? I haven't see the movie yet, but in the , we can see Cap trying to lift Mjolnir in the humorous scene where every Avenger gives it a try.  Mjolnir even moves just a tiny bit and at this very moment we see Thor's smile disappearing. This, of course, is intended as a humorous and lighthearted scene.  But it got me thinking: why isn't Captain America worthy of Mjolnir? He seems to be the most "perfect" human being anyone can be: brave, not selfish, legitimate leader, prompt to sacrifice (as seen in the first movie, when he jumps on a fake grenade).  I ask this question in light of this very specific scene, but I'm interested in the Marvel Universe (and Marvel Cinematic Universe) as a whole. Maybe Captain America did wield Mjolnir once? Maybe he has some individual flaw I am not aware of that makes him unworthy? What's the bad magic number error? What's the "Bad magic number" ImportError in python, and how do I fix it?  The only thing I can find online suggests this is caused by compiling a .py -> .pyc file and then trying to use it with the wrong version of python. In my case, however, the file seems to import fine some times but not others, and I'm not sure why.  The information python's providing in the traceback isn't particularly helpful (which is why I was asking here...), but here it is in case it helps:  Traceback (most recent call last):   File "run.py", line 7, in &lt;module&gt;     from Normalization import Normalizer Show that $(L^{p},\|\|_{p})$ is a Banach space. Show that $(L^{p},\|\|_{p})$ is a Banach space.  My approach: I prove the statement for $(L^{1},\|\|_{1})$, of the following way, first all, is easy show that $\|\|_{1}$ is a norm. So,  $(L^{1},\|\|_{1})$ is vector space. To show that is a Banach space, note that  Prop. 1: Let $(f_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\subset\mathcal{L}^{1}$ (where $\mathcal{L}^{1}=\mathcal{L}^{1}(X,\tau,\mu)$ is the space of all integrals function), such that $\sum_{i}{\|f_{n}\|}_{1}&lt;\infty$, then the sequences $\left(\sum_{n=1}^{N}{f_{n}}\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ converges almost everywhere to the integral function, that we called $\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}{f_{n}}$. Furthermore $$\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}{\int{f_{n}d\mu}}=\int{\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}{f_{n}d\mu}}\quad\lim_{N\to\infty}{\|\sum_{n=1}^{N}{f_{n}}-\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}{f_{n}}\|_{1}}=0$$ Prop. 2: Let $(E,\|\|)$ a normed vector space. Then $E$  is a Banach space if and only if for all $(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\subset E$ such that $\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}{\|e_{k}\|}&lt;\infty$, $\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n}{e_{k}}\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ converges in $E$  We take the proposition 2. Let $(f_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\subset L^{1}$ such that $\sum_{n}{\|\hat{f}_{n}\|_{1}}&lt;\infty$. Let $f_{n}\in\hat{f}_{n}$, then $\|f_{n}\|_{1}=\|\hat{f}_{n}\|_{1}$ and then $\sum_{n}{\|f_{n}\|_{1}}&lt;\infty$, by prop. 1, there exist $F\in\mathcal{L}^{1}$ such that $\|\sum_{n=1}^{N}{f_{n}-F\|_{1}}\to 0$, and then $\|\sum_{n=1}^{N}{\hat{f}_{n}-F\|_{1}}\to 0$. Finally note that $\hat{F}\in L^{1}$ is a Banach space. This was my answer for  $L^{1}$ space, but how I prove the general statement for $L^{p}$ (I want to do a similar response). Edit: I'm stuck in the problem, any idea or hint is appreciated.Thanks!! In the Peter Jackson movie, once the One Ring is thrown into the volcano in Mount Doom, why does the mountain and tower collapse, and the ground disappears everywhere where the orcs are standing but not where the humans are? Where are all the orcs running to, what do they do next? Elements order in a "for (… in …)" loop Warning: mysql_fetch_* expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given error I wonder if this is a bug, or if I missed something... When a light hits tangentially convex surfaces with "smooth shading", the shadow on this surface seems to "partially ignore" the smoothness of the surface. Here is an example with a simple cylinder :    On the left, a cylinder with "flat shading". Everything's ok. On the right, the same with "smooth". We can see an edge, bad shadowed.  With or without the "Edge split" modifier, no matters, the edge is still there. The shader is a simple white diffuse shader with no texture nor displace.  I have to add a subsurf modifier with at least 2 levels, which will insanely increase the vertex count... And I can't do that for my project.  I hope someone already saw it, and have a little tip to share. Or if someone already know it's a bug, or a limit of the current Cycles renderer ? How to compare two columns and find differences in Excel? I have two columns in Excel that I want to compare and find the differences between them.  Suppose:   Col A has 50 numbers, i.e. 0511234567 Col B has 100 numbers in the same format Using sObject.get() to fetch a field value from a related parent object I have a contact in a generic sObject in apex and while I'm able to easily get detail field values using   sObject.get('MyContactField__c')  I'm not able to get fields off the related parent object, and I'm sure the related field is in memory, based on the debug logs. This returns a runtime error:  sObject.get('Account.MyAccountField__c')  with the error     Invalid field Account.MyAccountField__c' for Contact   How do I get a field value off of a parent on a generic sObject? Finding an expression for $\tan (a+ b + y)$ which involves only $\tan a, \tan b,$ and $\tan y$. How to find this ?   I'm stuck at $1$ and how to $1$ to change the tangent associated with a,b or c.  I meant this ,everybody.  $\frac{tan(a)+tan(b)+tan(y)−tan(a)tan(b)tan(y)}{1−tan(a)tan(b)−tan(a)tan(y)−tan(b)tan(y)}$ Html form in email Proof verification: Set of partial limits of a sequence is closed I have Ubuntu 17.10 with GNOME 3.  What happens: I have (for example) LibreOffice Calc open, with some data columns in it.  I highlight the columns I want to chart, then I select INSERT > CHART.  The chart child window dialog pops up on top of my data, so I want to move it to the side.  When I grab the top bar and move it, the parent (spreadsheet) window minimizes (I think it actually disappears).  Continuing the above example, if I click FINISH on the chart window, I can then see the minimized spreadsheet application, which is the window title bar plus the menu bar just below it.  This seems like really odd behaviour and certainly falls under the category of "not being useful to the user", since the whole idea of moving the child window in the first place was just to be able to better see the spreadsheet!  In other applications, for example the PDF viewer, a slightly different problem occurs.  When I try to move the child window (for example the print dialog) the parent does not minimize but instead follows the child window around.  This is less surprising than having the parent disappear entirely but equally useless in terms of allowing the user to see the information present in the parent window.  Update 2017/11/06  Pomsky's answer below fixes the problem, but leaves me wondering why the window manager is making the decision that all child windows have modal behaviour (or don't), and not the applications themselves; and further, why modal behaviour prevents moving the child screen around when it obscures useful info on the parent screen.  Neither of these seem like good design to me... Enlarged partition, filesystem still reports old size I resized the root partition with GParted, from 20 GB to 40 GB, but the filesystem still reports a size of 20 GB.  How can I use all 40 GB?    Update  The resized partition was an LVM Physical Volume (/dev/sda2), and the boot partition is ext4 (/dev/sda1). What caused the oathbreakers in the Paths of the Dead to turn into shades? In Return of the King, we are told that the shades who populate the Paths of the Dead are the spirits of oathbreakers who refused to aid Isildur in the first fight against Sauron.  First, we are told of the oath (Book 5, Chapter 2):     But the oath that they broke was to fight against Sauron... For at Erech there stands a stands yet a stone that was brought, it is said, from Númenor by Isildur... and upon it the King of the Mountains swore allegiance to him in the beginning of the realm of Gondor.   Then, when they fail to honor the oath, we are told about Isildur's curse on them:     "...this curse I lay upon thee and thy folk: to rest never until your oath is fulfilled."   And as we see in the following chapters, the Sleepless Dead are indeed subject to this curse exactly as Isildur descibed it. What seems less clear, however, is how Isildur's curse manages to alter the fundamental nature of the oathbreakers' mortality, so that they became undead shades instead of simply dying in disgrace.   Do we have any other examples of Isildur performing similar acts of magic? Based on what we are told in LotR, Isildur appears to have been a great warrior, but not a regular practitioner of magic. Is the stone at Erech somehow magically involved? (If so, do we know anything more about it or how it works? Does its origin in Númenor have any significance?) It is mentioned that the oathbreakers had worshiped Sauron; could this be a clue? How does the human eye knows how far the object from which the photon was reflected? A photon is emitted from a source and reflected off an object (or objects) until it hits the human eye. The color of the object we see depends on the photon wavelength. If photon travels with constant speed how does the human eye know how far the object from which the photon was reflected? apt install "*" method in Ubuntu 20.04 does not work How to pass the output of one command as the command-line argument to another? So I have a script that, when I give it two addresses, will search two HTML links:  echo "http://maps.google.be/maps?saddr\=$1\&amp;daddr\=$2" | sed 's/ /%/g'   I want to send this to wget and then save the output in a file called temp.html. I tried this, but it doesn't work. Can someone explain why and/or give me a solution please?  #!/bin/bash url = echo "http://maps.google.be/maps?saddr\=$1\&amp;daddr\=$2" |  sed 's/ /%/g' wget $url Apparent Violation of Newton's $3^{\text{rd}}$ Law and the Conservation of Momentum (and Angular Momentum) For a Pair of Charged Particles Consider a system of the two identical positive point charges situated in free space (isolated from the influence of any other external fields) as shown in the attached diagram. Particle $1$ is at $(a,a,0)$ and particle $2$ is at $(0,a,0)$. Their velocities, at the considered instant of time, are as shown in the diagram ($\mathbf{v}_1$ along the $+x$ axis, $\mathbf{v}_2$ along the $+z$ axis).    Now, by applying the Biot-Savart law, we find that the magnetic field due to particle $2$ at the position of particle $1$ is along $+y$ axis, which means that the force acting on particle $1$ is along $+z$ axis according to Fleming’s left-hand rule. A similar analysis shows that there is no magnetic force on particle $2$ as the magnetic field of particle $1$ should vanish at positions (relative to particle $1$) located along its velocity vector.  Now, if we observe the net torque on the system of two particles about the $y$ axis then it is non-zero and is directed along the $-y$ axis. Here, there are no external forces or torques acting on the isolated two-particle system, and yet the net torque, as well as the net force on the particles, are nonzero. Why? Also, Newton's third law of motion seems to be broken in this scenario. Why?    Edit $1$  I have come to know from the responses that the electromagnetic field itself takes away some momentum and angular momentum about the considered axis. However, I think that if I consider only two charged particles as my system then the Abraham-Lorentz force can be assumed to be acting upon the system, and that is sufficient to make sure that we have considered the momentum being carried away by the electromagnetic field itself.   Even after considering the action of the Abraham-Lorentz force for the two-particle system, the scenario breaks both Newton's third law and the conservation of linear and angular momentum. This is because the Abraham Lorentz forces do not exactly counterbalance the force and the torques, on the two-particle system under consideration, due to the magnetic field.    Edit $2$  The previous edit was a result of confusion and misunderstanding on my part. The force associated with the momentum carried away by the electromagnetic field as a result of the electromagnetic interaction described in the question is the Lorentz force itself which simply doesn't obey the third law of motion. The Abraham-Lorentz force is a different story. It is associated with the momentum carried away by the radiation emitted by the accelerated charged particles. This is an additional force apart from the Lorentz force and corresponds to an additional carriage of momentum by the electromagnetic field. The momentum carried away by the electromagnetic field in correspondence with the Lorentz force doesn't correspond to radiation. Why don't virtual particles violate conservation of mass/energy?