What are the UK tourist visa requirements for an Algerian citizen on an Irish work visa?
Do I need visa for UK visit if I have a work permit for Ireland?
Would it be possible for some to bend two elements? After reading this question  While it seems that it would break one of the rules of the show, that only the avatar can master all four elements. There would also be good reasons as to why someone couldn't learn all four, there is always the opposing element that is hardest for the Avatar to learn. I don't see any reason why someone couldn't learn to bend two elements (not master, but just bend since Thadeus's Answer  to the previous question is apparently the Definitive Answer on the subject.)    Many benders do learn to bend beyond their element such as Toph becoming a metal bender and Katarra bending blood. Now metal is considered part of the Earth but so is sand and it seems that sand is moved more like water. Iroh was able to adapt a water bender technique to fire bending which means it is possible to learn and use different bending styles. Also Iroh spent time connecting to the spirit world and that seems to be the main reason the Avatar is able to bend all 4 elements. So if someone was connected to the spirit world or even their past life that would fulfill that requirement.   Would it be possible to bend two elements?  There do seem to be times where it has been done in the series such as bending mud which is both Earth and Water. And there would definitely be limits such as a Earth bender couldn't bend Air and a Water bender couldn't bend Fire. But why couldn't a Fire Bender learn to bend Air. They both use breath control as a main focus of their bending. It also states on the Energybending wiki entry that all bending used to be done as an inner bending but that it became element bending.   So with new bending techniques being formed all the time, already stated used of combined elements being used, an assumed spiritual connection to a past life or a spiritual journey been taken, energybending rediscovered is it possible that two elements could be bent by one bender who is not the Avatar? C# Regular Expressions with \Uxxxxxxxx characters in the pattern While studying rotational mechanics, I came across a section where it mentioned that angular momentum may not necessarily be parallel to angular velocity. My thoughts were as follows:  Angular momentum ($L$) has the relation $L=I\omega$ where $\omega$ is angular velocity and $I$ is the moment of inertia, so following this relation, it seems they should be in the same direction. Why are they not? What is the name of an 80s TV movie where a man acquires endurance powers and quick self-healing ability after a crash with a vehicle containing radioactive material? Some movies feature child characters put in violent situations. This can range from crude language to extreme horror (e.g. torture, gore, etc.). As an example,  and its sequel has plenty of those scenes. It looks like a paradox that children can be actors in movies that are definitely not for children.  Do the directors usually try and avoid exposing the very young actors to the violence of such scenes, e.g. by clever dubbing and editing? Are there laws that require them to do so, just like there are ratings that prevent children from seeing some movies? What does it do exactly if I click in the window of cmd? Suppose I run cmd.exe and ping localhost. After that I ping localhost again but I click into the window and the ping stops until I press enter.  What happens exactly when I click into the window? Does it suspend the process or something else? I attached a screenshot to clarify this issue.  Note: I do not actually click but drag using the mouse which creates a white box in the window as you can see on the screenshot.  Edit: further clarification: What I really wish to know is whether dragging the window halts the cmd process or not?  Edit: even more clarification: I know that I'm using Quick Edit and pressing enter copies the contents I selected. What I do not know is what happens in the background. 16.04 Cannot install anything from Ubuntu Software center Whenever I double click a deb file, it'd be opened in software center. However, when I click "install" button, it'd change to "installing" for a second but then turn back to "install" and nothing happens. It also says "This software comes from a 3rd party and may contain non-free components" at the bottom. I have enabled all the options in Software &amp; Updates and also tried reinstalling software center but nothing helped. Future Simple and Future Perfect I've read  about Future Simple and Future Perfect, but I still can't understand the exact usage of these two tenses. Is there any diffrence between the following?     I will do my homework by 6 p.m.   I will have done my homework by 6 p.m.       I will do my homework after school   I will have done my homework after school   Also, I've checked the word 'by' in  and there're some confusing examples:       By the time (that) this letter reaches you I will have left the country.   Can I use 'By the time (that) this letter reaches you I will leave the country' instead? Why does the QGIS Server WMS layer not load in QGIS Desktop? How to include PDF pages without a newpage before the first page? How do I parse a string to a float or int? How does the wording "for each" work? Some cards in magic has something happen for each {something}. For instance:  makes you gain 2 life for each creature you control. Tapping  adds one green mana to your mana pool, and you gain 1 life for each non-land card revealed.  How is this life gained: all at once or "one bit" at a time? Say I tap Selvala and 1 land, and 2 non-lands are revealed: do I gain 2 life, or do I gain 1 life two times? Would  have one or two +1/+1 counters placed on it if I had it in play at that point? I just flagged a comment as "obsolete" in . To my surprise, it was deleted immediately, just after pressing "Flag Comment".  Now I see it in my flag summary as helpful:        Does this mean that obsolete flags are somehow handled automatically? I went through  but could not find any description on this. Take the following two lines of code:  for (int i = 0; i &lt; some_vector.size(); i++) {     //do stuff }   And this:  for (some_iterator = some_vector.begin(); some_iterator != some_vector.end();     some_iterator++) {     //do stuff }   I'm told that the second way is preferred. Why exactly is this? What is the purpose of the Assemblies node in Web.Config? When creating a new ASP.NET AJAX Web Application in Visual Studio 2005, the default web.config contains the following section (inside the compilation node):  &lt;assemblies&gt;     &lt;add assembly="System.Web.Extensions, Version=1.0.61025.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35"/&gt; &lt;/assemblies&gt;   Whether or not the assemblies node exists doesn't seem to affect the AJAX functionality.  Update panels, etc work fine regardless of whether or not the reference to System.Web.Extensions is included in Web.Config.  What's the purpose of this section, and can it be safely removed? Does the sum of reciprocals of primes converge? Is the null set a subset of every set? Ever since day one of of my Mathematical Logic course, this fact has really bothered me. I cannot wrap my head around how an empty set is a subset of every possible set. Could someone kindly explain how this is true? Any help is appreciated! Could cancer be in itself a evolutionary process? Could cancer be in itself a evolutionary process? Maybe in some way could it be a process of variation? Or would this idea be completely without support, if so, why?   I don't mean that each case would lead to evolution, but that within an entire group of organisms, it could lead to case of of individuals developing ways to resist what caused the cancer, maybe in cases of individuals beating the cancer or in cases of successive generations of off spring from individuals with cancer?   Could it be possible that in rare cases it could lead to the development of new organs or specialized cells? I have a program which produces useful information on stdout but also reads from stdin. I want to redirect its standard output to a file without providing anything on standard input. So far, so good: I can do:  program &gt; output   and don't do anything in the tty.  However, the problem is I want to do this in the background. If I do:  program &gt; output &amp;   the program will get suspended ("suspended (tty input)").  If I do:  program &lt; /dev/null &gt; output &amp;   the program terminates immediately because it reaches EOF.  It seems that what I need is to pipe into program something which does not do anything for an indefinite amount of time and does not read stdin. The following approaches work:  while true; do sleep 100; done | program &gt; output &amp; mkfifo fifo &amp;&amp; cat fifo | program &gt; output &amp; tail -f /dev/null | program &gt; output &amp;   However, this is all very ugly. There has to be an elegant way, using standard Unix utilities, to "do nothing, indefinitely" (to paraphrase man true). How could I achieve this? (My main criteria for elegance here: no temporary files; no busy-waiting or periodic wakeups; no exotic utilities; as short as possible.) Why do investors pay trillions for minority stakes in companies, when their only potential payback is modest uncertain dividends? I'm struggling to understand the core reason to invest in stocks as a minority shareholder. Majority shareholding makes more sense as you effectively control the company, so you can pay yourself dividends or even sell the entire company at will. You can guarantee your own payback.  However, as a minority shareholder, you don't get to make any of these decisions. You're basically just hoping to eventually, some day get paid, if the majority holders decide so.  Why do so many investors agree to pay now huge sums of money (trillions in total) for something that may eventually pay dividends, and even in the best case, these dividends are only a fraction of the price you paid to acquire these stocks?  The average annual dividend rate for the US stock market is 2%. That means if you bought 100 million worth of shares, you'd have to wait 50 years to recover your investment.  Of course, the most probable way you'd eventually get liquidity for these shares is by selling them to some other starry-eyed investor - which makes the whole thing seem like a giant Ponzi scheme.  Given all that, it's unclear to me why the public is willing to spend so much money to acquire minority shares in companies.