Output is not in human readable format when writing content of an Excel sheet to console in C#
Reading Excel files from C#
Smeared creamy look effect i came across a photo where the gradient looks like it s smeared from cream. It is hard to explained by saying so here is the  Let say i create 2 similar shapes with the gradient pattern then adjust the opacity but the edges will still remain. But in the example the edges are appeared to be soft and hard randomly. Thanks in advance ! Overriding public virtual functions with private functions in C++ What are the differences between "su", "sudo -s", "sudo -i", "sudo su"? At some point, the filesystem on my digital audio player has become read-only. I cannot copy files into it or remove files on it.  Are there some possible reasons for the player's file system to change permissions in this way?  I tried using chmod:  $ sudo chmod a+rw SGTL\ MSCN/  chmod: changing permissions of `SGTL MSCN/': Read-only file system   SGTL MSCN is the mount point of the digital audio player.  What else can I try to make it writeable? Seeking QGIS tutorials and web resources? How to make a HTML Page in A4 paper size page(s)? Show that the function $g(x) = x^2 \sin(\frac{1}{x}) ,(g(0) = 0)$ is everywhere differentiable and that $g′(0) = 0$ Show that the function $g(x) = x^2 \sin\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) ,(g(0) = 0)$ is everywhere differentiable and that $g′(0) = 0$. I just discovered Matlab's factor()-function, and I randomly typed in 20081294819, and to my surprise it only had two factors (5099 and 3938281)! I had expected many more factors for such a big number and wondered how normal this was. The following is what I've done in my investigation so far.  In the first figure below, I have plotted the probability that some number below $10^k$ has $m$ indistinct prime factors.  The second figure shows the evolution of the probability of finding a number with $m$ indistinct prime factors as the numbers one is looking at grows, i.e. it is just another way to visualize the same data. I have left out all points of zero probability.  If one looks at the first part of the figure, it seems that the peak of the curve for some $k$ shifts toward higher $m$ as $k$ grows.   My first question is this: Does this behavior (i.e. the peak shifting toward higher $m$ as $k$ grows) continue indefinitely, or will the peak stabilize at some point? The latter seems unlikely but I can't be sure.  My second question is this: Approximately how fast does the peak-value $m_{peak}$ move as $k$ grows?  I briefly looked at the , but this involves distinct primes and I don't really know much number theory, so any help would be greatly appreciated! BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file What are our policies regarding self-harm and suicide? What should I do as a Moderator when I encounter situations regarding self-harm and suicide? When is it correct to use "yourself" and "myself" (versus "you" and "me")? $$\lim _{x \rightarrow 0} \left(\frac{ \sin x}{x}\right)^{1/x}$$  I have spent an hour on the above limit and have no work to show. I tried using L'Hopital's Rule, but just kept going around in circles. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. Is there a difference between Bayesian and Classical sufficiency? The title pretty much says it all. I wonder whether there is any difference in the way Bayesians understand sufficiency vs. the way orthodox statistics understands sufficiency, or are they equivalent?  If there is a difference, what is it? Remove all content using pure JS Solving $\cos x=x$ I would like to know how can we solve the equation $\cos x = x$, without graphing. I know that  there would only be one solution, that is obvious, that too in between $0$  and $\frac{\pi}{2}$. Is there any real expression in finite terms [perhaps we call that closed form, I am not sure] that could give $x$ or $\cos x$. Although I have not studied Taylor series, I know that it only gives an infinite series, which is not what I want. I suspect that it could not be done, but can anyone explain me why?  Just for completeness, Wolfram Alpha, gives the approximate answer $x = 0.7390851332151606416553120876738734040134$, but fails to give a exact solution. Prove that there exists at least one $x_0\in\mathbb{R}$, such that $f(x_0)+f''(x_0)=0$ Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a function, two times   differentiable with $\left|f(x)\right|\leq1,\forall x\in\mathbb{R}$   and $f^2(0)+\left(f'(0)\right)^2=4$. Prove that there exists at least   one $x_0\in\mathbb{R}$, such that $f(x_0)+f''(x_0)=0$.   I have tried the usual Rolle method by $e^x$, but didn't go far... Any help available? How to choose a lens for my first DSLR? I am considering buying my first DSLR.  How do I know whether I need a 18-200 lens, 17-85, or 18-55? Or something else? Maven check for updated dependencies in repository Is it possible to batch import Wavefront .obj to blender? I'm working on 2.69. If I select multiple .obj files, only one gets imported. Also if I hit A on file selection window to select all files (.obj and .mtl) I get an error, nothing gets imported. I have to import several hundreds of .obj into the blender file, is this possible? How do I get attention for one of my own questions without a good answer?