What does "val = yield xxx" mean in Python
What does the "yield" keyword do?
How to show subsubsections and paragraphs in TOC? So we have something like:  \documentclass{article} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \setcounter{tocdepth}{2} \usepackage{amsmath}  \begin{document}  \tableofcontents  \section{Brushless Motor Fundamentals} \subsection{Brushless Motor Operation} \subsubsection{DC Motor Operation} Torque is generated in DC motors from the magnetic force, also known as the Lorentz force, which is produced when an electric current is passed through a coil in a magnetic field. This force is given by $F=q[E+(v\times B)]$, where $F$ is the force perpendicular to the coil, $E$ is the electric field in the coil, $B$ is the magnetic field, and $v$ is the velocity of the charged particles in the coil. From mechanics, torque is $\tau=F\times r$.  \section{Brushless Motor Fundamentals 2} \subsection{Brushless Motor Operation} \subsubsection{DC Motor Operation 2} If the electrical force is ignored and the remaining magnetic force is used, with the assumption that $v$ is perpendicular to $B$, we find that $\tau=qvBrsin\theta$.  \end{document}   How to show subsubsections and paragraphs in TOC? Both the Romulans and the Federation have regularly violated the Treaty when it suits them. Starfleet has obviously developed and manufactured cloaking/stealth technology and the Romulans make regular excursions across the Neutral Zone. They obviously aren't declaring all-out war, so what penalties or sanctions have been imposed for violations?  -edit added for clarity-  Has either side ever 'punished' their own people for any violations of the Treaty? Precedence between implication and bi-implication I came across this question:  Let p, q, and r be the propositions  p : Grizzly bears have been seen in the area. q : Hiking is safe on the trail. r : Berries are ripe along the trail. Write these propositions using p, q, and r and logical connectives (including negations).     If berries are ripe along the trail, hiking is safe if and   only if grizzly bears have not been seen in the area.   I see an If r,q iff ~p where If r,q is the part "If berries are ripe along the trail, hiking is safe" and ~p is "grizzly bears have not been seen in the area"  and I came up with (r -&gt; q) &lt;-&gt; ~p  But the answer given is: r -&gt; (q &lt;-&gt; ~p)  Can someone please explain the difference in precedence? What does "calculus" mean? "calculus" and "formal system"  From      a calculus is a formal system that consists of          a set of syntactic expressions (well-formed formulæ or wffs),    a distinguished subset of these expressions (axioms), plus    a set of formal rules that define a specific binary relation on the space of expressions.      From      Formal systems in mathematics consist of the following elements:         A finite set of symbols (i.e. the alphabet), that can be used for constructing formulas (i.e. finite strings of symbols).   A grammar, which tells how well-formed formulas (abbreviated wff) are constructed out of the symbols in the alphabet. It is   usually   required that there be a decision procedure for deciding whether a   formula is well formed or not.   A set of axioms or axiom schemata: each axiom must be a wff.   A set of inference rules.      what is the difference between a formal system, and a calculus, then? I think they are the same? "calculus" and "logic system"  "Calculus" appears in "propositional calculus" and "first-order predicate calculus", which are also called "propositional logic" and "first-order logic" respectively. So I thought "calculus" and "logic" mean the same, and "a logic" is, according to ,      A logical system or, for short, logic, is a formal system together with a form of semantics, usually in the form of model-theoretic   interpretation, which assigns truth values to sentences of the   formal language, that is, formulae that contain no free variables.    But then I saw "calculus" also appears in "lambda calculus", which is also a formal system. I think a lambda calculus isn't a logic system, right? What does "calculus" mean in "lambda calculus"? Furthermore  "calculus" can also mean computational real analysis for first-year college students.   Thanks. Register On-Click Event with jQuery - Not Firing If $\mathbf A$ and $\mathbf B$ are Hermitian, when does $\det(\mathbf A-\lambda\mathbf B)=0$ have only real roots? Let $\mathbf A, \mathbf B$ be Hermitian matrices of the same size. What is the characterization of $\mathbf A, \mathbf B$ such that $p(\lambda)=\det(\mathbf A-\lambda\mathbf B)=0$ has only real roots?   If $\mathbf B$ is positive definite (I corrected this), it is easy to see $p(\lambda)$ has only real roots. Elegant way of obtaining the envelope of oscillating function I have a final exam tomorrow for fluid mechanics and I was just looking over the practice exam questions. They do not provide solutions. But pretty much I have to define pressure at a point and also say why pressure is scalar instead of a vector.  I am thinking pressure at a point is $P=\lim_{\delta A \to 0} \frac{\delta F}{\delta A}$. Please let me know if I am wrong.   But I do not know at all why pressure is a scalar instead of a vector. I know it has something to do with $d \mathbf{F}=-Pd \mathbf{A}$ Iterating through list of list in Python Let $U_1, \cdots, U_n$ be $n$ i.i.d continuous uniform random variables on $(0,1)$ and their order statistics be $U_{(1)}, \cdots, U_{(n)}$.  Define $D_i=U_{(i)}−U_{(i−1)}$ for $i=1, \cdots, n$ with $U_0=0$.  I am trying to figure out the distribution $\lim_{n\to\infty} \#\{i = 1, \cdots, n \mid nD_i \geq z\}/n$. This must be very well known, but I cannot find a reference. What is the difference between call and apply? Biasing circuit - Voltage follower circuit This occurs in the  released recently to the public. When someone posts a code block in their question or answer, the code block is cut off on the right hand side, and I can't scroll to the right to view the rest of it. How can I view these code blocks? When I measure a 9V DC wall adapter power supply with a multimeter it shows 11.8V. When connected to my board this voltage lowers to 10V. Is this normal? Should I be afraid of toasting my  supplied board when using this adapter?  Edit: This regulator accepts up to 12V inputs. So that will be no problem. A second "9V" adapter yields 15V to the multimeter. Will this one burn my circuit? Interval preserving transformations are linear in special relativity In almost all proofs I've seen of the Lorentz transformations one starts on the assumption that the required transformations are linear. I'm wondering if there is a way to prove the linearity:  Prove that any spacetime transformation $\left(y^0,y^1,y^2,y^3\right)\leftrightarrow \left(x^0,x^1,x^2,x^3\right)$ that preserves intervals, that is, such that  $$\left(dy^0\right)^2-\left(dy^1\right)^2-\left(dy^2\right)^2-\left(dy^3\right)^2=\left(dx^0\right)^2-\left(dx^1\right)^2-\left(dx^2\right)^2-\left(dx^3\right)^2$$  is linear (assuming that the origins of both coordinates coincide). That is, show that $\frac{\partial y^i}{\partial x^j}=L_j^i$ is constant throughout spacetime (that is, show that $\frac{\partial L_j^i}{\partial x^k}=0$).  Thus far all I've been able to prove is that $g_{ij}L_p^iL_q^j=g_{pq}$ (where $g_{ij}$ is the metric tensor of special relativity) and that $\frac{\partial L_j^i}{\partial x^k}=\frac{\partial L_k^i}{\partial x^j}$. Any further ideas? Creating account didn't log me in / didn't create an account I am a Bangladeshi citizen. Back in 2013, I went to India with a tourist visa and overstayed for four days. It was due to a gout attack in my feet but I don't have my medical papers to prove that.  I applied again in 2015 for a visa, at Dhaka, and they refused my visa and blacklisted my passport, writing some numbers and date on it. Now I am not able to get an Indian visa.  How I can remove my passport from the blacklist and get a new Indian visa? Do I need a Indian immigration lawyer to do this? Why exactly does diffraction occur? Why do waves that were traveling in a straight direction change direction when passing through an opening?  I thought that the waves (red arrow) when colliding with the wall bounce in the opposite direction (green arrow).  And the waves that pass through the aperture follow its path normally as shown in the image on the right.   The waves that go in a straight direction should follow traveling straight line like a car that goes under a bridge the car is straight on the road. But this is not so.  Why does the direction of the waves change?  How is the direction of the waves calculated? How to change radius/weight of curve bezier? try scaling, change radius, but its dont work Why does Beamer not change the itemize symbol when using \setbeamertemplate? This code:  \documentclass[10pt]{beamer} \setbeamertemplate{itemize item}[circle] \setbeamertemplate{itemize subitem}[triangle] \setbeamertemplate{itemize subsubitem}[square]   \begin{document} \begin{frame} \begin{itemize} \item first level     \begin{itemize}     \item second level         \begin{itemize}         \item third level         \end{itemize}     \end{itemize} \end{itemize} \end{frame} \end{document}    produces this output:    I expected the symbol of the first level item to be a circle, not a square. Is there an error in my code? The log file was too long to include in the question, so I .