Do I need to apply separate visa if my destination is France and my flight transit via Germany?
Do I need a visa to transit (or layover) in the Schengen area?
I'd like to know if the following problem of elementary linear algebra is already solved / solvable.  For two (singular) $n\times n$ matrices $P$ and $Q$, if $\det(\lambda P+\mu Q)=0$ for any $\lambda,\mu\in\mathbb{R}$, what are conditions on $P$ and $Q$? How do I set the default program? How to inset a face? I am trying to set up a Minecraft rig mouth that will have more controls and will be rounded, but I am having issues trying to figure out what this guy did here. First, he did what looked like a loop cut and slide, but instead of drawing a line it selected all the edges it passed through. He then cut to a new clip where the mouth was already set up like this.    The video is in 3 times speed but if you download a youtube plugin you can slow it down to 0.25 speed of the video and then if you do the spacebar trick you can slow it down so it shows 1 frame at a time and it is really slow.  if you want or need to see the video.  All I am asking is how can I create those 8 basic segments. I currently have an ec2 &quot;t2.nano&quot; instance up and running. I would like to switch to a &quot;t2.micro&quot;. In order to do that, I need to stop the instance. But I would lose my IPv4 address in the process. And I do not want that (because I have several ssh tunnels up and running from rasps in the wild that are currently hard coded to connect to this IPv4 address). I decided to create an Elastic IP address. But I understand that by creating an Elastic IP address and assigning it to my current ec2 instance, I would lose my current IPv4 address too. Is it possible to create an Elastic IP address from the current IPv4 address of my ec2 instance? If so, how can I do this operation? Is it possible for more than two particles to be entangled in a quantum way? So I know that two particles can be entangled in a quantum way, but is it possible that more than two particles be entangled in a quantum way? Most descriptions provide with two-particles cases, so I wonder. (It's hard to think of three particles entangled in spin, or so.) C# How do I click a button by hitting Enter whilst textbox has focus? I'm working with a WinForm app in C#, after I type something in a textbox I want to hit the Enter key but the textbox still has focus (flashing cursor is still in textbox), how can I achieve this? How to reset evolution settings to defaults? I have not used Evolution for long time now and I would like to reset all the settings and start from scratch. How would I be able to do this? A linear operator commuting with all such operators is a scalar multiple of the identity. The question is from Axler's "Linear Algebra Done Right", which I'm using for self-study.  We are given a linear operator $T$ over a finite dimensional vector space $V$. We have to show that $T$ is a scalar multiple of the identity iff $\forall S \in {\cal L}(V), TS = ST$. Here, ${\cal L}(V)$ denotes the set of all linear operators over $V$.  One direction is easy to prove. If $T$ is a scalar multiple of the identity, then there exists a scalar $a$ such that $Tv = av$, $\forall v \in V$. Hence, given an arbitrary vector $w$, $$TS(w) = T(Sw) = a(Sw) = S(aw) = S(Tw) = ST(w)$$ where the third equality is possible because $S$ is a linear operator. Then, it follows that $TS = ST$, as required.  I am, however, at a loss as to how to tackle the other direction. I thought that a proof by contradiction,  ultimately constructing a linear operator $S$ for which $TS \neq ST$, might be the way to go, but haven't made much progress.   Thanks in advance! To my knowledge there are three types of acceleration when a body (e.g. a rod) is moving in a circle about an axis. These are:   Angular acceleration : this is the rate of change of angular velocity. Tangential acceleration : this is the linear acceleration of the system in a tangential direction to the circle and equals the radius times the angular acceleration. Radial/centripetal acceleration : this is the linear acceleration of the system that is directed inwards towards the center of the circle.   I also think there are two types of velocity:   Linear velocity: this is its velocity in the tangential direction and is constantly changing Angular velocity or angular frequency: this is the rate of change of angle.   Is the above correct? And have I missed anything? Serial protocol delimiting/synchronization techniques As asynchronous serial communication is widely spread among electronic devices even nowadays, I believe many of us have encountered such a question from time to time. Consider an electronic device D and a computer PC connected with serial line (RS-232 or similar) and required to exchange information continuously. I.e. PC is sending a command frame each X ms, and D is replying with status report/telemetry frame each Y ms (The report can be sent as response to requests or independently - doesn't really matter here). The communication frames can contain any arbitrary binary data. Assuming the communication frames are fixed-length packets. The problem: As the protocol is continuous, the receiving side might loose the synchronization or just &quot;join&quot; in the middle of an ongoing sent frame, so it just won't know where the start of frame (SOF) is. A the data has different meaning based on its position relatively to the SOF, the received data will become corrupted, potentially forever. The required solution Reliable delimiting/synchronization scheme to detect the SOF with short recovery time (i.e. it shouldn't take more than, say 1 frame to resynchronize). The existing techniques I am aware (and using some) of: 1) Header / checksum - SOF as predefined byte value. Checksum in the end of frame.  Pros: Simple. Cons: Not reliable. Unknown recovery time.  2) Byte stuffing:  Pros: Reliable, fast recovery, can be used with any hardware Cons: Not that suitable for fixed-size frame-based communication  3) 9th bit marking - prepend each byte with additional bit, while SOF marked with 1 and the data bytes are marked with 0:  Pros: Reliable, fast recovery Cons: Requires hardware support. Not directly supported by most of PC hardware and software.  4) 8th bit marking - kind of emulation of the above, while using the 8th bit instead of 9th, which is leaving only 7bits for each data word.  Pros: Reliable, fast recovery, can be used with any hardware. Cons: Requires an encoding/decoding scheme from/to the conventional 8-bit representation to/from 7-bit representation. Somewhat wasteful.  5) Timeout based - assume the SOF as the first byte coming after some defined idle time.  Pros: No data overhead, simple. Cons: Not that reliable. Won't work well with poor timing systems like, say, Windows PC. Potential throughput overhead.  Question: What are the other possible techniques/solutions exist to address the problem? Can you point to the cons in the above list which can be easily worked around, thus removing them? How do you (or would you) design your systems protocol? Dual-boot boot menu does not show up after installing Ubuntu 15.10 alongside Windows 10 How to auto close LWC quick action from JavaScript? Determining true mean from noisy observations I have a large set of data points of the form (mean, stdev). I wish to reduce this to a single (better) mean, and a (hopefully) smaller standard deviation.  Clearly I could simply compute $\frac{\sum data_{mean}}{N}$, however this does not take in to account the fact that some of the data points are significantly more accurate than others.  To put it simply, I wish to preform a weighted average of these data points, but do not know what the weighting function should be in terms of the standard deviation. Do lure modules and incense cause new pokemon to spawn near you, or existing pokemon to be drawn to you? I need to convert an arbitrary amount of milliseconds into Days, Hours, Minutes Second.  For example: 10 Days, 5 hours, 13 minutes, 1 second. Using Model to equally distribute points, spatially within known geometry using ArcGIS ModelBuilder? Is it possible to create a model in ArcGIS ModelBuilder where you simply state number of points and an area in the form of a polygon to get the model to try and equally space out the points based on the geometry of the polygon and number of points? What's the difference between postfix/smtp and postfix/smtpd A bit confused when reading through the logs of my smtp/mail server, I'm turning this questions to you guys.   In the maillog files I'm seeing entries for postfix/smtp as well as postfix/smtpd. I can also see that there are possible settings for smtp as well as smtpd in the file main.cf  Trying to find some reasonable explanation through google search seemed to be impossible, so here is my question to you guys.  My server was kind of compromised and the spam mails where going through postfix/smtp and not smtpd. Please help me to understand. Thanks in advance! Equifax credit score discrepancy in 1 month, why? I just went to Citi Bank's website (which gives free FICO scores from Equifax for users of some credit cards) and I realized that the score I saw there was a whopping ~50 points higher than the number I saw on Mint.com, despite the fact that they both claim to have received the number from Equifax. The only difference is the fact that Mint checked my score at the end of February 2015, whereas Citi checked it at the end of January 2015.  However, nothing unusual has happened to my credit history in between these two. I can confirm on Mint's credit report that nothing seems wrong, so I'm quite confused:   What can cause such a discrepancy? Whom should I contact to understand what is going on -- Mint, Citi, Equifax, or other? How should I contact them -- file a dispute, call them, or go somewhere in person?   Note that I don't feel I'm "disputing" anything, since I don't know if there is any cause for a dispute, and hence I'm not sure it makes sense to open a dispute with Equifax. I just want to know what is going on and why two third-party agencies claim to have received such wildly different numbers from the same agencies in the span of 1 month. Can a monk make a bonus unarmed attack after using shocking grasp? I'm playing a 5e Wizard/ Monk build. My DM and I are questioning the viability of the cantrip Shocking Grasp. As a monk I can do another unarmed strike as a bonus action after I attack with a melee attack. Being a touch spell, can I punch (touch) with Shocking Grasp and then do my monk's bonus action? Mapping ManyToMany with composite Primary key and Annotation: