Doing a tag only edit on a previous revision doesn't do the expected roll-back
Editing older revision (not most recent) no longer includes older title and tags, and automatic rollback note
Lens upgrade paths (sub $1000) for the EF-S 18-55mm IS kit lens for Canon APS-C cameras (mód 1) is not copied correctly Please consider the following MWE:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[spanish]{babel} \selectlanguage{spanish} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}  \begin{document} Works: áéà  Does not work: \(\pmod1\) \end{document}   The áéà text is copied correctly, but if I try to copy (mód 1) it says: (m´od 1).  Does anyone know why this happens? How is it solved?  Thanks! What's the difference between Google Chrome and/or Chromium? What are the advantages/disadvantages to each? I used Google Chrome in Windows, and am now using Chromium in Ubuntu.  Is there any difference to the two programs?  What are the advantages and disadvantages to each program?  Which one seems better? Should we write “allow” or ”allows” in “require that the class allow[s]”? Can you explain to me whether I should or should not use ‑s at the end of the  verb allow in this sentence?     This function requires that the container class allow[s] random access   The sentence in the book I read wrote allow without ‑s. However, the container class is a third-person singular, so the ‑s must be required. Is that right? What are the most accepted ways to visualize the results of an independent two sample t-test? Is a numeric table more often used or some sort of plot? The goal is for a casual observer to look at the figure and immediately see that they are probably from two different populations. I initially thought that dark energy must in some way violate conservation of mass and energy since the component of the energy density of space that comes from dark energy is constant, and space is expanding. Therefore, as space expands the energy in the universe that comes from dark energy would increase. I presumed the source of this energy was not coming from the conversion of other types of energy to dark energy, so it must violate conservation.  I decided to Google this and came upon this article:    It says that dark energy does NOT violate conservation and quotes Carroll, Press, and Turner (1992):  "…the patch does negative work on its surroundings, because it has negative pressure. Assuming the patch expands adiabatically [i.e. without loss or gain of heat], one may equate this negative work to the increase of mass/energy of the patch. One thereby recovers the correct equation of state for dark energy: P = – ρ c2. So the mathematics is consistent."  Is there a way to explain this in layman's terms? (The blog attempted to do this, but it was very unclear to me.) More specifically, can you explain where my initial train of thought described above fails when I erroneously concluded that dark energy violates conservation?  Thank you. Handling circular entity references with Migrate I am using  on a Drupal 6 to Drupal 7 migration right now.  I have three types: type1, type2, type3.  Each of the three types has a entityreference field on it, which is configured to be able to point to all three types.  This means that there can be circular references, and when a particular node is being migrated, the destination node may not exist yet and could potentially be any of the three types.  My migration class looks like this:  class MyNodeMigration extends DrupalNode6Migration {   public function __construct(array $arguments) {     parent::__construct($arguments);      $this-&gt;addFieldMapping('field_legacy_nid', 'nid');      $this-&gt;addFieldMapping('field_the_reference', 'field_the_reference')       -&gt;sourceMigration(array('type1', 'type2', 'type3');   } }  $node_arguments = array(   array(     'class_name' =&gt; 'MyNodeMigration',     'description' =&gt; 'type1',     'machine_name' =&gt; 'type1',     'source_type' =&gt; 'type1',     'destination_type' =&gt; 'type1',     'dependencies' =&gt; array('roles', 'users'),   ),    array(     'class_name' =&gt; 'MyNodeMigration',     'description' =&gt; 'type2',     'machine_name' =&gt; 'type2',     'source_type' =&gt; 'type2',     'destination_type' =&gt; 'type2',     'dependencies' =&gt; array('roles', 'users'),   ),    array(     'class_name' =&gt; 'MyNodeMigration',     'description' =&gt; 'type3',     'machine_name' =&gt; 'type3',     'source_type' =&gt; 'type3',     'destination_type' =&gt; 'type3',     'dependencies' =&gt; array('roles', 'users'),   ), );  $common_node_arguments = $common_arguments + array(   'user_migration' =&gt; 'users', );  foreach ($node_arguments as $arguments) {   $arguments = array_merge_recursive($arguments, $common_node_arguments);    Migration::registerMigration($arguments['class_name'], $arguments['machine_name'], $arguments); }   When I run the migrations, most nodes are fine, but I get a decent amount of Stubs (*) created.  Some of the destination nodes have the entityreference pointing to these Stub nodes.  The source nodes are fine.  What I have uncovered is that the bundle on the destination nodes that are being made as stubs are incorrect, and look like they are all type1.  A node of the proper type does end up being created, but it never gets set as the entityreference target.  Another way to explain this is that I end up with   node: nid=123, type=type1 node: nid=234, type=type1, field_the_reference=123 node: nid=345, type=type2   where it should be   node: nid=234, type=type1, field_the_reference=345 node: nid=345, type=type2   How do I handle this situation?  (*): a "Stub" in the context of this question here refers to a node which is created for the purpose of being a reference target, but does not get its data initially. The term is used throughout the Migrate documentation and source code. What does the @ symbol before a variable name mean in C#? Possible Duplicate:          I understand that the @ symbol can be used before a string literal to change how the compiler parses the string.  But what does it mean when a variable name is prefixed with the @ symbol? Pivot in sql server Which preposition in front of "line" — "on", "in", "at"? Copy files excluding x,y,z causing error in shell script I'm not well versed in shell scripting but I imagine this to be a painfully easy fix but its eluding me.  I need to copy the contents of a directory excluding a number of files. I have a command that works when I enter it into the terminal, but when its run in a shell script it fails with a syntax error or just doesn't work.   The command in question is:  cp -r path/to/!(dir1|dir2|dir3) destination   Any help would be greatly appreciated! Could someone advise me on how to determine all entire functions $f$ such that $|f'(z)| \leq |f(z)|, \forall z\ ?$  Hints will suffice, thank you. What TV movie had lost space cadets who piloted yellow tripod robots, and a squid bad guy? I'm trying to find a movie I watched on TV, probably in the 90s. I think it was a made-for-TV movie.  It was about a ship with an AI. The ship was crewed by young adults. I think they were cadets?   There was an accident (like a warp drive malfunction) and they end up in another part of space where they meet a female alien whose ship had been shot down.  I remember they had manned robots they would pilot and they took them to a planet to get upgraded and they are attacked by more manned robots. They had three legs and they were yellow, I think.  I also remember the baddie had a holo-projector or something like that which allowed him to change his appearance. He commanded a massive fleet and he worked for someone he spoke to in a video chat that looked like a squid. Galactic Rotation Speeds - Ehrenfest Paradox, Gravitational time dilation, Dark Matter - all of the above? WPF Binding to Grid Column Width I'm attempting to bind a DependancyProperty in one of my usercontrols to the Width property of a Column in a Grid.   I have code similar to this:  &lt;Grid x:Name="MyGridName"&gt;     &lt;Grid.ColumnDefinitions&gt;         &lt;ColumnDefinition x:Name="TitleSection" Width="100" /&gt;         &lt;ColumnDefinition Width="*" /&gt;     &lt;/Grid.ColumnDefinitions&gt;      &lt;Grid.RowDefinitions&gt;...&lt;/Grid.RowDefinitions&gt;      &lt;GridSplitter x:Name="MyGridSplitter" Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="0" ... /&gt; &lt;/Grid&gt;   In a separate Usercontrol I have the followingDependancyProperty defined.  public static readonly DependencyProperty TitleWidthProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("TitleWidth", typeof(int), typeof(MyUserControl));  public int TitleWidth {     get { return (int)base.GetValue(TitleWidthProperty); }     set { base.SetValue(TitleWidthProperty, value); } }   I am creating instances of the Usercontrol in code, hence I have a binding statement similar to this :  MyUserControl Cntrl = new MyUserControl(/* Construction Params */); BindingOperations.SetBinding(Cntrl , MyUserControl.AnotherProperty, new Binding { ElementName = "objZoomSlider", Path = new PropertyPath("Value"), Mode = BindingMode.OneWay }); BindingOperations.SetBinding(Cntrl , MyUserControl.TitleWidthProperty, new Binding { ElementName = "TitleSection", Path = new PropertyPath("ActualWidth"), Mode = BindingMode.OneWay }); /* Other operations on Cntrl */   The first binding defined works fantastically, although that is binding to an actual UIElement (in this case a Slider), but the Binding to "TitleSection" (which is the ColumnDefinition defined in the Grid) fails. Putting a breakpoint in the code and doing a watch on "TitleSection" returns the expected object.   I am beginning to suspect that a x:Name'd ColumnDefinition can't be bound to. Can anyone suggest how I might be able to bind to the changing width of the first column in my grid?  EDIT #1 - To answer comments  The databinding 'fails' in the sense that with a breakpoint set on the setter for the TitleWidth property, and using the GridSplitter control to resize the first column, the breakpoint is never hit. Additionally, code I would expect to be fired when the DependancyProperty TitleWidth changes does not get executed.  The usercontrol is being created and added to a Stackpanel within the Grid in the Window_Loaded function. I would expect that the Grid has been rendered by the time the Usercontrols are being constructed. Certainly the x:Name'd Element TitleSection is watchable and has a value of 100 when they are being constructed / before the binding is happening.  EDIT #2 - Possibly something to do with this?  I've been having a sniff round the MSDN pages for the Grid ColumnDefinition documentation and have come across  but I can't get my head around how I can use this in a binding expression. I cannot use the associated GridLengthConverter as a converter in the binding code as it does not derive from IValueConverter.   I am leaning towards somehow binding to the ActualWidth property of one of the cells in the Grid object. It doesn't seem as clean as binding to the column definition, but at the moment I cannot get that to work. Can we start cleaning up [table] tag and burninate it ASAP Related questions:     (This led to founding of )   The tag  has become cluttered with all kinds of questions ranging from sql tables (for all DBM systems, HTML tag &lt;table&gt;, outputting content in any language (PHP, C#, LaTeX to name a few) as a table and several plugins of various languages and/or IDEs (like jTable, tablesorters and the kind).  The current count stands at 18,315 questions having this ambiguous tag. A few of possible suggestions for cleaning process:    +  to  |   +  to  |   +  to  |   +  to  |   + other-specific-DBM systems to whatever_DBM_it_is-table  +  to  |    Since I've no idea about other languages and their specific features regarding table, I'd ask the community for their input on this (such as , ,  and ). The other questions are either tagged with arrays or sql and similar tags, and in my opinion, just removing  from such questions would be enough! Why don't wizards always use multiple wands? Deploy Community Builder audience page assignments with ant migration tool? $ KC $ spaces imply $ US $ spaces , but vise versa is false. When did our universe and the Star Trek universe diverge? Note that my question assumes as a given that Star Trek is in an alternate universe which diverged from ours at some point in history.  That seems really, really obvious and undeniable to me.  So the question then becomes: at what point in time did the two universes diverge and have different histories?