break out of the while loop?
How do I compare strings in Java?
What does active mean? How to Combine two Normal Maps? I made a high poly model and then baked its textures onto a low poly model. Now I want to give another normal map's details to the model. How can this be done? Testing random variate generation algorithms Which methods are used for testing random variate generation algorithms? Basic desktop actions are not available on Ubuntu 20.04 Probability of 3 people in a room of 30 having the same birthday I have been looking at the birthday problem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem) and I am trying to figure out what the probability of 3 people sharing a birthday in a room of 30 people is. (Instead of 2).  I thought I understood the problem but I guess not since I have no idea how to do it with 3. From the user's perspective when switching on the phone, I see two boot animations in my  running CM10. The first animation is from LG and the second animation is from CM10. Then it settles in with a locked screen ready for my input. What happens behind the scene (screen) during a boot process when an Android device is switched on? It will be helpful if the answers can help a non geek to understand various process and jargon (like, fastboot, bootloader, recovery, if applicable, etc.) regarding boot sequence. I was wondering what might be making my questions less attractive to users?  I get very low views most of the time. What should be done to increase a question's popularity? Calculating $\lim_{x\to0} \left\lfloor\frac{x^2}{\sin x \tan x}\right\rfloor$ I was working on a userscript today, which had a goal of displaying chat pings immediately at the main site. This would allow me to respond more quicker-like to chat pings.  However, I was met by this fearsome warrior:     Can we please set some decent header things? I want to be able to do this really bad. Undefined reference to static class member Can anyone explain why following code won't compile? At least on g++ 4.2.4.  And more interesting, why it will compile when I cast MEMBER to int?  #include &lt;vector&gt;  class Foo {   public:       static const int MEMBER = 1;   };  int main(){       vector&lt;int&gt; v;       v.push_back( Foo::MEMBER );       // undefined reference to `Foo::MEMBER'     v.push_back( (int) Foo::MEMBER ); // OK       return 0; } I often have to write up reports based on the analysis of some data. I use R to analyse the data and export tables, figures, and text. This is then included into a LaTeX document either using input or Sweave ().  However, when I collaborate with others, I sometimes need to provide a document in Open Office / MS Word format.  Question:  Thus, assume the simplest scenario   I have a LaTeX document with text, tables, and figures I need to export this reliably into Open Office or MS Word format: this includes mathematical formulas, table formatting, and quality figures) I don't need to go back from MS Word to LaTeX   What is a reliable, efficient, and preferably free process?  Initial Thoughts:   Export to HTML,  LaTeX - LyX - ODF Use odfWeave  that deals with some specific issues associated with LaTeX to Open Office conversion    I was hoping that there is an expert out there who has worked out a good system already. How to Understand the Definition of Cardinal Exponentiation I'm having trouble understanding the definition of cardinal exponentiation.  Let's start with the definitions / claims I've been given:  For any finite sets $A,B$, such that if $|A|=a$ and $|B|=b\neq 0$ then the number of functions from $A$ to $B$ is $b^a$. ( I'm guessing this is only used when both sets are finite ).  For any sets $A,B$, $B^A$ is the set of functions from $A$ to $B$.  For every set $A$, $|P(A)|=|\left \{ 0,1 \right \}^A|$  Now for the definition and why I don't understand it:  Let $a,b$ be cardinal numbers.  Let $A,B$ be sets such that $|A|=a, |B|=b$.  Then $|B^A|=b^a$.  How analagous to normal exponentiation is this and where does in differ when we introduce cardinals like $\aleph_0$ or $C$?  Is $2^2=4$ and is $\frak c^2=c\cdot c=c\times c$? Ubuntu 19.10 change desktop environment I've installed another desktop environment which I would like to try. I am not sure how to switch to it.  Is there still a button on the log in screen that will switch desktop environments? This same question for previous versions of ubuntu yields screenshots of this button. But I cannot find any button on the log in screen that does this.  So, in ubuntu 19.10, does there exist a button to switch desktop environments? If so, where is it? If not, what is an alternative method to switch desktop environments after I've already installed one?  ██████@████-linux:~$ ls /usr/share/xsessions gnome-flashback-compiz.desktop    ubuntu.desktop gnome-flashback-metacity.desktop   The gear icon does not show up for me, as the answers indicate it should.    Solved. I was not logged out properly. I locked the screen thinking that was logging out. Logging out properly fixed the issue. I read news on the BBC (on its website) this morning. When I was reading the news I noticed the definite article the was missing in a sentence. As per my opinion, the reporter missed the article the. But I also thought that the reporter also had some point as he did not use the article there. So I just wanted to confirm so landed here to get some help on it.     On the website:      It also proclaimed the group's leader, XYZ  (name), as caliph and   "leader for Muslims everywhere".      As per my opinion it should have been:      It also proclaimed the group's leader, XYZ  (name), as the caliph and   "leader for Muslims everywhere".   Source link: Should I get the +2 bonus twice for suggesting a tag wiki? Newton's cradle Internet through wireless hotspot, intranet through wired network - can I use both at the same time? About 'start' and 'begin' Are 'begin' and 'start' interchangeable? Both &quot;This is a new start&quot; and &quot;This is a new beginning&quot; work, right? Then during games, they say &quot;Let's start&quot;, but I never heard &quot;Let's begin&quot;. So is there supposed to be a difference? And then one guy said this &quot;They could not begin to start a conversation&quot;. What is this supposed to mean? Is it correct? Is the graviton hypothetical? Wikipedia lists the  as a hypothetical particle. I wonder whether graviton is indeed hypothetical or does its existence directly follow from modern physics? Does observation of gravitational waves amount to the discovery of graviton or could there be gravitational waves not composed of gravitons? Comprehensive Rules for Game of Thrones Lines of Succession I'm three quarters through the third book, "Storm of Swords" right now (so please, no spoilers from too late in the book or any subsequent books).  I just read a part where Tyrion is discussing with Prince Oberyn and they mention the difference between Dornish law and Westerosi law in Line of Succession (ie women can rule under Dornish law).  I'm a little confused trying to puzzle out what the exact LOS rules are.  At first I though it was: at the moment a king/lord dies, to find who holds the title next, you do a depth-first search down the family tree starting with the oldest sibling (ignoring anyone who isn't true-born or has given up their claim ie as Night's Watch or Kingsguard etc.).  Then, for Dornish law you take the first living person and for Westerosi law the first living male person found in this way (so succession can pass through a woman in both cases, but only Dornish law actually allows them to claim the title). If there are no valid living heirs, then you work backwards along the paternal line until you find an ancestor who has living heirs and start from them.  But there were various references to if Sansa's brothers were all dead, then her child would claim Winterfell.  It seems to me that that's only true if somebody else doesn't get it first.  In other words, if Sansa's brothers are killed before she has a child (even if she's already married), doesn't that mean Winterfell would pass to the nearest cousin along her father's line (whomever that may be)?  And then because that cousin has already held Winterfell, when they die the next in the line of succession starts from them so Sansa's children's family would not have claim to Winterfell again unless that cousin has no valid heirs.  What am I missing here? Is there some exception?  Are there no valid cousins?