Find process started with arguments
How to read command line arguments of another process in C#?
I am trying to create the following trigger:      CREATE TRIGGER update_customers AFTER INSERT ON wp_usermeta     FOR EACH ROW      BEGIN             if new.wp_metakey = first_name then insert into test_customer(first_name) values (new.wp_meta_value);     END   I keep getting a 1064 error that says, "You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresopons to your MySQL server version for the right syntaxt to use near " at line 5"  What am I doing wrong? How can std::make_heap be implemented while making at most 3N comparisons? Suppose that $S_0$ and A are positive numbers, let $$S_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2}\left(S_n +\frac{A}{S_n}\right)$$ with $n \geq 0 $.      (a)Show that $S_{n+1} \geq \sqrt{A} $ if $n \geq 0$       (b)Show that $S_{n+1} \leq S_n $ , if $n \geq 1$      (c) Show that $s= \lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} S_n$ exists      (d) find s   (a) Show that $S_{n+1} \geq \sqrt{A} $ if $n \geq 0$  Given $$P_n:  S_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2}\left(S_n +\frac{A}{S_n}\right) \geq \sqrt{A}$$  $$P_0: S_{1} = \frac{1}{2}\left(S_0 +\frac{A}{S_0}\right) \geq \sqrt{A}  $$  We assume that $P_n$ is true  $$P_{n+1}: S_{n+2}= \frac{1}{2}\left(S_{n+1} +\frac{A}{S_{n+1}}\right)$$ by assumption $$S_{n+2}= \frac{1}{2}\left(S_{n+1}\left(1 +\frac{A}{(S_{n+1})^2}\right)\right) \geq \frac{1}{2}\left(\sqrt{A}\left(1 +\frac{A}{(\sqrt{A})^2}\right)\right)$$ $$ S_{n+2}= \frac{1}{2}\left(S_{n+1} +\frac{A}{S_{n+1}}\right) \geq \sqrt{A}  $$  It follows that $S_{n+1} \geq \sqrt{A} $    (b) Show that $S_{n+1} \leq S_n $ , if $n \geq 1$  $$S_{n+1} \leq S_n$$ $$\frac{1}{2}\left(S_n +\frac{A}{S_n}\right) \leq S_n $$ Dividing by $S_n$ $$\frac{1}{2}\left(1 +\frac{A}{S_n^2}\right) \leq 1 $$ $$\frac{A}{2S_n^2} \leq \frac{1}{2}$$ $$A \leq S_n^2$$ $$S_n \geq \sqrt{A}$$ As  $S_{n+1} \leq S_n$ yields a true statement, it follows $S_{n+1} \leq S_n$ is true.    (c) Show that $s= \lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} S_n$ exists  Since $S_{n+1} \leq S_n$, the sequence is non-increasing,   using the non-increasing theorem stating that      if $\{S_n\}$ is non-increasing then $$\lim\limits_{n \rightarrow &gt; \infty} S_n = \inf\{S_n\} $$     (d) find s    Is the argumentation in (a) and (b) appropriate? Also, I have to admit I m getting less confident in my argumentation (c) and (d). How to proceed in (c) and (d)?  Much appreciated for your input or help. Why would spacetime curvature cause gravity? It is fine to say that for an object flying past a massive object, the spacetime is curved by the massive object, and so the object flying past follows the curved path of the geodesic, so it "appears" to be experiencing gravitational acceleration. Do we also say along with it, that the object flying past in reality exeriences NO attraction force towards the massive object? Is it just following the spacetime geodesic curve while experiencing NO attractive force?  Now come to the other issue: Supposing two objects are at rest relative to each other, ie they are not following any spacetime geodesic. Then why will they experience gravitational attraction towards each other? E.g. why will an apple fall to earth? Why won't it sit there in its original position high above the earth? How does the curvature of spacetime cause it to experience an attraction force towards the earth, and why would we need to exert a force in reverse direction to prevent it from falling? How does the curvature of spacetime cause this?  When the apple was detatched from the branch of the tree, it was stationary, so it did not have to follow any geodesic curve. So we cannot just say that it fell to earth because its geodesic curve passed through the earth. Why did the spacetime curvature cause it to start moving in the first place? Compute: $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sqrt{n}(A_{n+1} − A_n)$ where $A_n = \frac{1}{n}(a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n)$ Let $\{a_n\}, {n\geq 1}$, be a sequence of real numbers satisfying $|a_n|\leq 1$ for all $n$. Define  $$A_n = \frac{1}{n}(a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n),$$ for $n\geq 1$. Then find $\displaystyle\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sqrt{n}(A_{n+1} − A_n)$ .    I proceed in this way  $$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sqrt{n}(A_{n+1} − A_n)=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sqrt{n}\left[\frac{1}{n+1}(a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n+a_{n+1})-\frac{1}{n}(a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_{n})\right]=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left[{(na_{n+1}-a_1 - a_2 - \cdots - a_n})\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}(n+1)}\right]$$  Please help me to complete from here How do I know whether my bike can use disk brakes? How do I print my Java object without getting "SomeType@2f92e0f4"? Why don't the White Walkers take the sea route to Westeros How can I determine the list of files in a directory from inside my C or C++ code?  I'm not allowed to execute the ls command and parse the results from within my program. Rep line graph: Say "only 200+ accounts displayed" at all times As discovered/discussed , the cross-site reputation graph doesn't show accounts that have less than 200 reputation. The problem is that, unless you have zero accounts over that bar, it doesn't tell you that. I think the "Accounts must have a minimum of 200 reputation to appear in this graph" notice should appear either (A) at all times or (B) if you have any accounts below 200. Extra "lines" are being added when creating/editing questions/answers in Edge Lately, I've noticed that extra lines are being added when I create questions/answers. For example, if I write:   Your problem is X, Y, Z. Fix it by doing:      Code  Then maybe also do some other thing.  Oh, and some other thing as well.   When I post it, then go back into the editor, it's been changed to:   Your problem is X, Y, Z. Fix it by doing:       Code   Then maybe also do some other thing.   Oh, and some other thing as well.   Which is mildly annoying since that causes less to be displayed in the box at once, but whatever.  The weird thing is though, the added line isn't properly treated as a newline, even though it does appear to be caused by a newline. A lot of lines that look like they should be empty don't even get rendered. If I delete the original lines that I entered leaving only the "new" newlines, I get weird behavior:    I tried selecting the characters involved and inspecting them in Python, and they just appear to be newlines, so I have no idea what the problem is.    The only browser I've been able to reproduce it in is Edge (version 44.18362.329.0). It does not happen in Chrome. This has been happening for ~3 days now.    There is also a problem with link embedding and code formatting. If while editing I highlight some text and either try to embed a link (interlinked circle button) or format it as code ({} button), it often puts the wrong text between the […]s when embedding, or formats code that I didn't highlight (and doesn't format the code that I did highlight). Are smaller p-values more convincing? Uncountable ordinals without power set axiom Assume $M$ is a set, in which all axioms of $ZF - P + (V=L)$ hold. Does then $M$ believe that there exists an uncountable ordinal? I mean, why should the class of all countable ordinal numbers be a set? Program counter goes to the end of code and 8051 Restarts I have an 8051 MCU which I use keil to program it with C. My problem is that the micro-controller restarts at the end of some functions while they should return.  Using a debugger I tried to check it line by line. And I figured out the the MCU is not restated right after the end of the function. The PC(progam counter) goes to somewhere else (sometime somewhere that there is not any code to execute) and then it increases one by one until the end of code. It is very strange for me because I write my code in C and never seen the type of error previously.    I think this problem might be related to the compiler settings and thus I post the settings here:   Assembler settings: XR GEN DB EP NOMOD51  Compiler settings:  DB OE BR LARGE OPTIMIZE(11, SIZE) DEFINE(SILABS_PLATFORM_WMB912) DEFINE(SILABS_WMCU_SI106x)  Linker settings: CODE REMOVEUNUSED CLASSES(BIT(0x20.0-0x2F.7), DATA(D:0-D:0x7F), IDATA(I:0-I:0xFF), XDATA(X:0-X:0xFFF), CODE(C:0-C:0xFBFF), CONST(C:0-C:0xFBFF))  I tried both large and small settings but the problem remains. Kindly help me if you know the reason. I am getting the following error in a Drupal 8 site.     The following module is missing from the file system   It looks as if a custom module was installed and deleted without uninstalling it.   How can I fix this error? How to set the monitor to its native resolution which is not listed in the resolutions list? After installing Ubuntu 10.04 with my Samsung SyncMaster B2030, native resolution (1600X900) is not found in the list of resolutions. Example of a function such that $\varphi\left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)\leq \frac{\varphi(x)+\varphi(y)}{2}$ but $\varphi$ is not convex I am just a high school student, and I haven't seen much in mathematics (calculus and abstract algebra).  Mathematics is a system of axioms which you choose yourself for a set of undefined entities, such that those entities satisfy certain basic rules you laid down in the first place on your own.  Now using these laid-down rules and a set of other rules for a subject called logic which was established similarly, you define certain quantities and name them using the undefined entities and then go on to prove certain statements called theorems.  Now what is a proof exactly? Suppose in an exam, I am asked to prove Pythagoras' theorem. Then I prove it using only one certain system of axioms and logic. It isn't proved in all the axiom-systems in which it could possibly hold true, and what stops me from making another set of axioms that have Pythagoras' theorem as an axiom, and then just state in my system/exam "this is an axiom, hence can't be proven".  EDIT : How is the term "wrong" defined in mathematics then ? You can say that proving fermat's last theorem using the number-theory axioms was a difficult task but then it can be taken as an axiom in another set of axioms .  Is mathematics as rigorous and as thought-through as it is believed and expected to be ? It seems to me that there many loopholes in problems as well as the subject in-itself, but there is a false backbone of rigour that seems true until you start questioning the very fundamentals . Solvability of $a \equiv x^2 \mod b$ How to run xrandr commands at startup in Ubuntu How can I run the following xrandrcommand on startup?  xrandr   cvt 1368 768  xrandr --newmode "1368x768_60.00"   85.25  1368 1440 1576 1784  768 771 781 798 -hsync +vsync xrandr --addmode VGA1 1368x768_60.00 xrandr --output VGA1 --mode 1368x768_60.00