How do I disable desktop dragging on Windows 8.1?
How can I disable the drag handle on the desktop?
Why does QgsSpatialIndex.nearestNeighbor(point, 1) sometimes return 2 lines? How can I repair the Windows 8 EFI Bootloader? Let $f$ be a real, continuous function defined on $[0,\infty)$ such that $xf(x)$ is increasing for all sufficiently large values of $x$. Show that if   $$\int_0^x f(y)\,dy \sim Ax^\alpha \quad \left(\,x\to \infty\right)$$  for some positive constants $A$ and $\alpha$, then  $$f(x)\sim \alpha Ax^{\alpha -1} \quad \left(\,x\to \infty\right).$$  Clearly, I have to use differentiation somewhere, but I don't know how to manipulate $\lim_{x\to \infty}\frac{\int_0^x f(y)\,dy}{Ax^\alpha}=1$ to get the desired result.  From suggestions given, I know that by L'hospital's rule, it's enough to show that the limit $\lim \frac{f(x)}{\alpha Ax^{\alpha -1}}$ exists, and this limit equals $ \lim \frac{xf(x)}{\alpha Ax^{\alpha}}$. From here, I'll need to use the given assumption that $xf(x)$ is eventually increasing. But how can I show the existence of the limit based on these facts?  I would greatly appreciate any solutions, hints or suggestions. How are app sales/acquisitions taxed in the US? Hypothetical scenario: I identify a gap in a company's product offering. I, as an independent developer, write a desktop, web, or mobile application that bridges this gap, and I contact the company in question. They like the product, and agree to acquire it from me.  To be clear, this scenario again isn't suggesting I've written an app and have put it on the App Store for continuous sale, but that I've written an app, and it has been acquired for a lump sum of money.  How is this taxed in the US? (Specifically, California.) Some thoughts I have:   Self-employment tax rate (currently 15.3%, I believe) CA sales tax (currently 7.25%) (Other income tax?)   Would this be taxed as a sale? Self-employment income? Both? What if I'm not self-employed, but the sale is much higher than my gross income? Example: $100,000 salary at company ___ that has no stake in the app invention, $1,000,000 app acquisition. Relativity and Galaxy Rotation Speed If time travels slower nearer gravity wells, why can't the galaxy rotation speeds being faster on the outer edges than the inner areas be explained by relativity? What necessitates dark matter? In Lieb and Loss's Analysis, I saw that they mentioned  $L^1(\mathbb{R}^n) \cap L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ dense in $ L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ (dense wrt the $L^2$ norm, I think). But I didn't find its proof in the book. So I wonder why it is?    Does this conclusion hold for $L^1(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mu) \cap L^2(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mu)$ for any measure space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mu)$?  Are there similar statements if replace $L^1$ with $L^p$, and  $ L^2$ with $L^q$ for $p \leq q \in (0, \infty ]$ or $\in [1, \infty]$?  Thanks and regards! Help me understand the proof for Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem! Sum over all non-evil numbers So this is something I just found out about that I find odd:   Opportunity attacks—trigger off of movement that uses the creatures movement (action, move action, bonus action, reaction.)  Sentinel—Whenever a creature within 5 ft of you makes an attack at a creature other than you.   Booming blade—If the target willingly moves.   Mental Prison spell—if it moves, attacks through it, or reaches any part of body out of it.   So the “willingly” is different than other rulings for how effects related to movement works. However what exactly fits willing?   Cause fear—nope magic is having them move. Dissonant whispers—same thing. They have to immediately move.   So the creature has to want to move completely of its own accord.   Crown of Madness—Humanoid creature you choose must make a wisdom saving throw. On a fail it is charmed by you. (Next is flavor text so skipping.) While charmed in this way the target must make an attack on a creature other than itself that you mentally choose on each of its turns before moving.  It can act normally if you choose no creature or if none are within reach.   Crown of madness isn't making them move but doesnt specifically say willing.  And if the ruling for willing is movement not caused by magic what about magic causing situations where you take damage if you don't move. Would a creature shimmering with evocation energy be spared because he moved out of the magical blender that is cloud of daggers? If no, then what is the go-to rule for willing movement that I should be using?  In short, what movement counts as willing, and where can it be found? Is moving out of obvious danger caused by magic, willing? Is moving away from an ally so you don't hit them, willing?   If there isn't any actual ruling on willing, that's fine; I'll go back to running it with my interpretation, so that it has same wording as AOO. If there is an actual 5e term or explanation for willing (that isn't Sage Advice), please let me know. I just don't see why it was necessary to put a term in the spell that isn't used anywhere else. I understand it could have been overlooked since it was in a splatbook or has just been ignored since most people probably assume that there is "Forced " and "Willing" movement, with the willing being defined as: any movement from an action, move action, bonus action, or reaction. In same way AOO work. My disk already has 4 primary partitions, how can I install Ubuntu? Class teardown in junit 3? How to install brackets.io from the command line? For some reason the gnome installer that handles .deb packages on my system is not working. I'm not concerned.  How would one install the Brackets.io program from the terminal? I would like to convert a Mp4 file in HD into a Mp4 file of lower resolution. Is there any software that can be used for this? AppFabric / WF 4.0 instances stuck despite no bookmark and pending timer $_POST vs. $_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] == 'POST' Does a non-trivial solution exist for $f'(x)=f(f(x))$? How to cancel a credit card and verify it was closed What kind of questions can I expect to see on a qualifying exam? In mathematics, there are certain open questions which are the subject of current research (think of the newest papers in the top journals).  I have also heard that some graduate programs ask questions such as these on their qualifying exam.  How common is this practice?  What kinds of questions can I expect to see on a qualifying exam?  I know that a qualifying exam typically tests the knowledge gained in graduate school, but I'm not sure to what extent this knowledge is tested?  How "advanced" should I expect these questions to be? what are the meanings of &quot;treated observation&quot; and &quot;non-treated observation&quot; in this context ?  Further, propensity score matching is a more robust method of matching that quantitative accounting researchers frequently use (Rosenbaum &amp; Rubin, 1983). With this technique, the researcher first estimates a logit or probit regression with the treatment effect as the dependent variable (i.e., S&amp;P 500 membership, continuing with our earlier example) and independent variables that are known determinants of the treatment (possibly economic performance, firm size, age, industry, etc. in our example). From this first-stage regression, the researcher obtains propensity scores. 6 The researcher then matches each treated observation to a non-treated observation based on the distance between their propensity scores (i.e., those observations with the closest propensity scores are matched). 7 Hoi et al. (2013) utilize propensity score matching in their study that links irresponsible CSR activities with tax aggressiveness. They first generate predicted propensity scores for each firm-year using a model of the determinants of a firm engaging in a high level of negative, irresponsible CSR activity. Then, they match a treatment firm (one with a high level of negative CSR activities) to a non-treatment firm (one with a low level of, or no, negative CSR activities) by matching observations with the closest propensity scores. Hoi et al. (2013) then re- test the relation between negative CSR activities and tax aggressiveness using this matched sample. These matching techniques help mitigate the researcher’s potential failure to consider certain firm characteristics that differ between treatment and non-treatment firms (Dhaliwal et al., 2012). Eeeeek - what happened to my @ salutation?