Change font size mid document consistently
Switching to different font size(s) locally
How do I execute a program X times in the terminal?  I read that I have to do a bin/bash txt, but I don't know how to execute this X times. Limiting double to 3 decimal places Some Data Failed to Reconstruct, Motion Tracking I added tracks and stuff, but then when I tried to solve motion track, there was a error that said:     Some Data Failed to Reconstruct   and it also said to look into the console for details, which I did. This is what the console said:    By my understanding, my video is 372 frames long, and Blender is cutting the footage at 318 for some reason. Here is the image of the scene:    Why? Here are links to  and also . Also the next morning I did a camera solve, but then most of the frames went red. Make flash drive bootable with MULTIPLE Windows Installers Windows 7 sleeping during operations I've got Windows 7 set up on my media box.  It's set to sleep after 30 mins of inactivity, but it doesn't seem to work as advertised. In the last two weeks it's gone to sleep during a file copy operation and again while encoding an MP4 file.  Is there any way to get Windows to realise that it's actually busy? "Unable to locate package sudo" when i try to install sudo on new Debian Can a goalkeeper chip the ball to the head of a teammate from a goal kick to circumvent the backpass restriction? In shell scripts used for unit testing with dynamic libraries in a directory other than the typical @rpath, I have previously been able to set DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH to set the directory containing the libraries. Under 10.11.1, bash seems to ignore attempts to set this environment variable:  $ sh -x testscript.sh + DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/Users/something/testinglibs + export DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH + exec printenv   and DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH is not present in printenv's output.  Is this a security-related hack in 10.11's shell? I haven't been able to find this change documented in man pages or online. How do I install the ubuntu-restricted-extras package? Should covariates that are not statistically significant be 'kept in' when creating a model? I have several covariates in my calculation for a model, and not all of them are statistically significant.  Should I remove those that are not?  This question discusses the phenomenon, but does not answer my question:   There is nothing in the answer to that question that suggests that non-significant covariates be taken out, though, so right now I am inclined to believe that they should stay in.  Before even reading that answer, I was thinking the same since a covariate can still explain some of the variance (and thus help the model) without necessarily explaining an amount beyond some threshold (the significance threshold, which I see as not applicable to covariates).  There is another question somewhere on CV for which the answer seems to imply that covariates should be kept in regardless of significance, but it is not clear on that.  (I want to link to that question, but I was not able to track it down again just now.)  So...   Should covariates that do not show as statistically significant be kept in the calculation for the model?  (I have edited this question to clarify that covariates are never in the model output by the calculation anyway.)  To add complication, what if the covariates are statistically significant for some subsets of the data (subsets which have to be processed separately).  I would default to keeping such a covariate, otherwise either different models would have to be used or you would have a statistically significant covariate missing in one of the cases.  If you also have an answer for this split case, though, please mention it. What is the best class or classes in 3.5e to build a character that uses both a sword and either arcane magic or psionics which can be fluffed as arcane magic and focuses on fighting powerful individual creatures?    I have a foundness for those that can sling spell along with blade, like Dak'kon from Planescape: Torment.  So, given that, how do I make the best Gishy character I can?  Specifically, the group is looking for a character focused on delivering high damage or other debilitating effects to an individual target.  There is no need to balance sword and magic, though I would prefer to have the melee abilities remain at least relevant through at least mid-levels.  This question:  is related.  But I am specifically looking to optimize for high targeted damage output and have no need to balance between sword and spell if focusing on one is more effective.  I have considered the duskblade and that may be the best answer, but as I have limited experience with 3.5 I want to find out if I should use a pure duskblade, a duskblade which steps into other classes, or some other class I have not considered.  In this particular case, the characters will start at level 7, and equipment rules are liberal as long as the characters can afford it.  I'm not sure how long this will last so I am focused on the next few levels instead of trying to plan all the way out to 20.  It will be a party of 5.  Not all of the rest of the characters have been fully fleshed out, but we will have a cleric and a wizard.  The other two are more up in the air but they one is looking at various rogue classes and the other is looking at some sort of melee class, with this gishy rounding out the team.  The initial encounter is up in the air, but there is a definite fondness for gryphons.  We do know that we will be working up to dragon in relatively short order, which is a factor in wanting to focus on large damage output to individual creatures as opposed to being able to deal with numerous weaker creatures.  The setting is "modified Forgotten Realms".    I personally own absolutely no 3.5 books, but we have access to a fair bit and just about anything from WoTC is permitted.  I am new to 3.5, but I have a fair bit of roleplaying experience including AD&amp;D.    Thematically, I envision the character as a generally honorable, but working as a monster hunter and mercenary.  I definitely favor swords though specifically which sword is flexible.  Dak'kon from Planescape would be an excellent example of what I would like to build, as would The Witcher.  Based on Kryan's excellent answer, it seems to be leading up to using duskblade and a specialist wizard to lead into Abjurant Champion. Appending the same string to a list of strings in Python Find the image of (1,1,1) by T iOS Launching Settings -> Restrictions URL Scheme Servlet returns "HTTP Status 404 The requested resource (/servlet) is not available" List files in a specific folder in a document library I there anyway to output the files of a specific folder in a document library?  Listing them will be like   foreach $file in $folder.files {     write-host $file.name }    But how do I tell it to look a specific folder? In CSOM please Tried the below answer but it did not work Prove that every prime larger than $3$ gives a remainder of $1$ or $5$ if divided by $6$ Can we prove that every prime larger than $3$ gives a remainder of $1$ or $5$ if divided by $6$ and if so, which formulas can be used while proving? Find $ P(Z>X+Y)$ where $X,Y,Z \sim U(0,1)$ independently I'm trying to follow a line in a derivation for $P(Z&gt;X+Y)$ where $X,Y,Z$ are independent continuous random variables distributed uniformly on $(0,1)$.  I've already derived the pdf of $X+Y$ using the convolution theorem, but there's a line in the answer that says:  $P(Z&gt;X+Y) = \mathbb{E}[\ P(Z&gt;X+Y\ |\  X+Y )\  ]$ where $\mathbb{E}$ is the expectation.  I'm not familiar with this result. Could anyone give a pointer to a similar result if one exists?  Thanks. What is the difference between const_iterator and non-const iterator in the C++ STL? What is the difference between a const_iterator and an iterator and where would you use one over the other? I'm desperatly confused by notations and formulations so if someone could clarify the following things a little Í would be deeply grateful. The Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow}$ of the proper orthochronous Lorentz group $SO(1,3)_+^{\uparrow}$ is given by \begin{equation} [J_i,J_j]=i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k \end{equation} \begin{equation} [J_i,K_j]=i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k \end{equation} \begin{equation} [K_i,K_j]=- i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k \end{equation} We can now define new generators with the old ones $N^{\pm}_i= \frac{1}{2}(J_i \pm i K_i)$ which satisfy \begin{equation} [N^{+}_i,N^{+}_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} N^{+}_k ,\end{equation} \begin{equation} [N^{-}_i,N^{-}_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} N^{-}_k ,\end{equation} \begin{equation} [N^{+}_i,N^{-}_j] = 0. \end{equation} where we can see that $N^{+}_i$ and $N^{-}_i$ make up a copy of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ each. My problem is to get what is going one here mathematically precise. Are the following statements correct and if not why:  When we build the new operators from the old generators we complexified $\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow}$ \begin{equation}(\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C} = \mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow}\otimes \mathbb{C} \end{equation} We saw that $\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C}$ is isomorph to two copies of the complexified Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{su(2)}$: $(\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C} \simeq \mathfrak{su(2)}_{\mathbb{C}} \oplus \mathfrak{su(2)}_{\mathbb{C}} $. Where exactly did we need that $\mathfrak{su(2)}$ is complexified here? The Lie algebras defined by $N^{\pm}_i$ are exactly those of $\mathfrak{su(2)}$ and we never use complex linear combination of $N^{\pm}_i$ or am I wrong here? $\mathfrak{su(2)}_{\mathbb{C}}$ is isomorph to $(\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C}$: \begin{equation}\mathfrak{su(2)}_{\mathbb{C}} \simeq (\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C} \end{equation} Here $(\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C}$ denotes the complexified Lie algebra of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ Is $(\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C} \simeq (\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{R}$ correct?  Here $(\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{R}$ denotes the real Lie algebra of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ Is $(\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C} \simeq (\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C} \oplus (\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C}$ correct?  I looked this topic up in different books and each seemed to state something different. One book even used three differrent versions of $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}) $ namely: $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}) $, $(\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C}$ and $(\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{R}$.  states simply that $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}) $ is the complexification of $\mathfrak{su(2)}$ without making any reference to $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ which does not help me either. Any help would be great.