Why is my eevee render turn gray?
Render result is completely blank
If I upgrade Ubuntu 12.04 to 14.04, will NS2 still be supported?  I am currently using NS2 on Ubuntu 12.04. Inherited values between polygons in QGIS In this project, I have three polygons, see the image below  'Polygons_From', includes input attributes, i.g. &quot;Value_1&quot;, &quot;Value_2&quot;, &quot;Value_3&quot;, and $area for each quadrate (on the image there are two types of them). 'Polygons_To' polygons for which new values &quot;Value_1_new&quot;, &quot;Value_2_new&quot;, &quot;Value_3_new&quot; need to be defined 'Border' defines an area where the calculation should be done.   My task is to transfer values from 'Polygons_From' into 'Polygons_To' based on a certain aspect/ratio. Of course, I can simply achieve it with the 'Union' function as was suggested in . It uses $area-factor, but perhaps there are better approaches that will lead me to a much more efficient output? So, I am asking for a recommendation regarding the technique/workflow that can be applied in QGIS 2.18. Shall I consider only $area or there are some other criteria? Moreover, I looking forward to finding some papers that may improve my general understanding of the methodology.  References: How do you run a 32-bit program on a 64-bit version of Ubuntu? I have a 64-bit version of Ubuntu 13.10.  I want to run a 32-bit version of a program.  However I see ia32-libs is not included in 13.10.  Is there a replacement package for this or what? My PC was working yesterday without any problem. I shut it down and tried to open this morning. It prints out these messages on the black screen:  systemd-udevd[713]: failed to execute '/bin/systemctl' '/bin/systemctl start --no-block nvidia-persistenced.service': No such file or directory  systemd-udevd[852]: failed to execute '/bin/systemctl' '/bin/systemctl stop--no-block nvidia-persistenced': No such file or directory   It then continued with the login screen. I entered my password and pressed enter. It waited for a while and the login screen reappeared again.  How can I fix the problem? How to sanity check a date in Java I watched this movie when I was a kid and never discovered it again.  It’s about a boy whose father left him after his divorce from the mother, the kid enters a world somehow where he has a big sword he needs to keep searching for precious stones to fill it with. it has certain holes that look like each stone shape! I also remember the kid going to eat with his mythical (dragon-like friend), and he gets stuck in the restaurant because the crazy restaurant lady won’t let him leave without finishing huge amounts of food!  The kid also gets bullied so I’m guessing the the swords journey is to teach the kid how to deal with all of this... We currently have around 20 apex classes and 5 triggers which are not used in our production org. We want to delete them in our production instance. We dont have ant scripts ready yet to be used for our deployments and so we cannot use destructivechanges file. Currently our production deployments are done by our support team and they need documentation from us to do these deletes. Changesets do not allow to delete apex classes and triggers. So what is the best way to delete these apex classes and triggers from production? I have a dual boot of Windows 10 and Ubuntu 16.04. Recently I upgraded it to 18.04. As soon as I did it, it started showing DISK IS LIKELY TO FAIL SOON (37° C / 99° F).    I checked the status of my disk via Windows and it shows it’s perfectly healthy. I assumed the error occurred because my partition size of Ubuntu was 64GB (which I now increased to 86GB). Please help me out with this.    Edit: The results of smartctl - attributes Animated textures don't work in Blender viewport playback I am trying to animate in 2d. I do it with planes that have textures on them. I recently came up with the idea of having a plane with an image sequence of mouths because animating actual lip syncing by hand takes too long and isn't really necessary for what I'm trying to acomplish. However, when playing back the animation in textured viewport shading the animated texture stays at the last frame until the animation stops. I can use the arrow keys and it works fine as well as scrubbing through the timeline, just not when playing back the animation with alt+a. Can anyone help me with this problem? Find the equation of the plane knowing that it passes through 3 points Exit strategies for "chameleon questions" Close/minimize/maximize button not appearing I was playing around with compizconfig. I don't remember what exactly I clicked. Since then, the close/minimize buttons and the sidebar vanished. I use 12.10 version. Please help me out. Analyzing limits problem Calculus (tell me where I'm wrong). I came accross: $$\lim_{x \to\ 0}\frac{x\cos x - \log (1 + x)}{x^{2}}$$  I tried the following please tell me where I 'm wrong:  $$\lim_{x \to\ 0}\frac{x\cos x - \log (1 + x)}{x^{2}} $$  $$\text{(Dividing by }x)$$   $$=\displaystyle\lim_{x \to\ 0}\dfrac{ \cos x - \dfrac{\log (1 + x)}{x}}{x} $$  $$=\lim_{x \to\ 0}\frac{\cos x - 1}{x} $$  $$=\lim_{x \to\ 0}\frac{-2\sin^{2} \dfrac{x}{2}}{x} $$  $$=\lim_{x \to\ 0}\frac{-2x\sin^{2}\dfrac{x}{2}}{(\dfrac{x}{2})^{2}\times 4} $$ $$\lim_{x \to\ 0}\dfrac{-x}{2}=0$$ But Answer given is $\dfrac{1}{2}$  Please Help. This has just dawned on me that if you're writing an operating system then what are you writing it on? I ask this as I am reading a microprocessor fundamentals book from 1980 and this question popped in to my head:   How was the first microprocessor chip programmed?  The answer may be obvious but its bugging me. I have learnt that the cardinality of the power set of the natural numbers is equal to the cardinality of the real numbers. What is the function that gives the one-to-one correspondence between these two sets?  I have also learnt that there exists no set whose cardinality is strictly between the natural numbers and the real numbers. Is there a proof of this or at least some intuitiveness behind it? What bike+equipment for a long daily urban commute? In the (distant) past I commuted 6 km (more than half an hour) each way, on a cheap bike with big knobbly tyres.  Soon I'll have a new commute: 18 km each way, daily. That's much further than I've done in the past, and I don't want it to take 2 hours each way; but  suggests that it's feasible:      Most people who reside 10 to 20 kilometres away will also find it quite easy to cycle to work, although the distance in the high end of this range will become a little more demanding.   If I can do it in 80 minutes or even less each way, that would be ideal. I'm 49 years old, 6 foot tall, and weigh 170lb, and I want to commute by bike because otherwise I'd be getting no exercise in my week at all.  I've never bought or ridden anything but a cheap bike.  What equipment should I buy then, to commute 11 miles each way through a city (Toronto) on  flat, paved roads, shared with cars:   Wheels? Tyres? Clipless pedals and shoes? Gears? Handlebars (e.g. flat or dropped)? Frame (size, shape, material)? Mud-guard/fender? Kronecker delta confusion I'm confused about the Kronecker delta. In the context of four-dimensional spacetime, multiplying the metric tensor by its inverse, I've seen (where the upstairs and downstairs indices are the same):  $$g^{\mu\nu}g_{\mu\nu}=\delta_{\nu}^{\nu}=\delta_{0}^{0}+\delta_{1}^{1}+\delta_{2}^{2}+\delta_{3}^{3}=1+1+1+1=4.$$  But I've also seen (where the upstairs and downstairs indices are different):  $$g^{\mu\nu}g_{\nu\lambda}=\delta_{\lambda}^{\mu}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\ 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array}\right).$$  How can there be two different answers to (what appears to me to be) the same operation, ie multiplying the metric tensor by its inverse? Apologies if I've got this completely wrong. Predicting the number of decimal digits needed to express a rational number The number $1/6$ can be expressed with only two digits (and a repeat sign denoted as $^\overline{}$), $$ \frac{1}{6} = \,.1\overline{6}$$  Meanwhile, it takes 49 digits to express the number $1/221$, since a string of 49 digits repeats: $$\frac{1}{221} = .\overline{004524886877828054298642533936651583710407239819}$$ Yet for $1/223$, 222 digits repeat, giving a total of 224 digits needed to express the number.  If $f:\mathbb{Q}\rightarrow\mathbb{N}$ is a function that gives the smallest number of digits needed to express a rational number in decimal notation, what can we say about $f$?  For example, if we do not consider the negative sign to be a digit, then $f$ is an odd function.  Other than that, is there any pattern to it at all? Where did the world go? I was playing on my main world when my laptop ran out of power.  I found a charger and woke it up, but Minecraft had crashed.  Now, it doesn't appear in the world selection screen!  I have verified that it still exists in the Minecraft folder, and the directory contents look to be in order.  Does Minecraft save an internal flag somewhere when it crashes hard?  If so, how do I reset it? I have been wondering why anyone ever thought that we could find an expansion for eigenstates of some perturbed Hamiltonian in terms fo those for the basis Hamiltonian. My lecturer insisted that this was because the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are complete', however from my (limited) understanding of the mathematical basis of QM:   When you are given a Hamiltonian, it comes with the Hilbert space of functions of which it acts (subject to some conditions we impose, such as the Lebesgue square-integrability of functions) When you are given another Hamiltonian, there is no guarantee that it will act on the same Hilbert space Therefore, that the zeroth order Hamiltonian has eigenstates forming a complete basis for the space on which ti acts does not guarantee that these same eignestates form a complete basis for the Hilbert space on which the purturbed Hamiltonian acts.   As a simple example. I can imagine adding a small perturbing magnetic field to a Hamiltonian in which there initially is none, such that we lose the degeneracy in the eigenstates accounting for different spins of a particle. One could say that we have the same Hilbert space before and after but we lose degeneracy; or I would have been tempted to say that our initial Hilbert space did not have these extra dimensions corresponding to the spin states. So rather than the eigenstates of the basis Hamiltonian also forming a complete basis for the purtubed Hamiltonian, but having eigenvalue degeneracy which is lifted on the purtubration, I would have said that our Hilbert space has changed. After all, if we take the former view (i.e. a basis accouting for spin but with degeneracy) then it seems like for any problem we would need to know and account for EVERY possible system property that can be discerned. This doesn't seem reasonable to me....  NOTE:  1) My question was asked here previously:   although there is only a discussion and no conclusive answer given. I see that the distinction is important in relativistic QM, and the case of adding a potential onto a free particle Hamiltonian seems to be a special one. Although I am still not sure what the answer is for general purturbations.  2) Similar question here:   but it seems to completely avoid answering the question.