LightRoom 5 Export looks different to the Develop screen
Why is Lightroom not rendering what I see in every other JPG viewer?
I am pretty sure it shouldn't, but want to make sure that I am doing this correctly in a proposal that I am working on.  Should job titles like "Project Manager" ever be capitalized, and if so when?  In particular I am concerned about capitalization in sentences like this where the title refers to a specific person, not the role in general.     "The Project Manager will   evaluate the alternatives and offer a   solution."   I'm a lot more certain that it should NOT be capitalized in sentences like this.     "A project manager is the person who   manages the budget and deliverable for   a project." My intent is to show that a composition of bijections is also a bijection by showing the existence of an inverse.  But my approach requires the associativity of function composition.  Let $f:  X \rightarrow Y, g:  Y \rightarrow Z, h:  Z \rightarrow W$ be functions.  $((f \circ g) \circ h)(x) = h((f \circ g)(x)) = h(g(f(x)))$, and $(f \circ (g \circ h))(x) = (g \circ h)(f(x)) = h(g(f(x)))$.  However, I am having problems in justifying that the two compositions, $(f \circ g) \circ h$ and $f \circ (g \circ h)$, have the same domain and range.  When I consulted ProofWiki, whose link is at the bottom, I got even more confused.  Specifically, for $(f \circ g) \circ h = f \circ (g \circ h)$ to be defined, ProofWiki requires that dom$g =$ codom$f$ and dom$h =$ codom$g$.  First of all, I think that it should be dom$g =$ range$f$ ....  Moreover, as you can see in the example below, you actually have to adjust domains and ranges of $f, g, h$ for the requirement to hold true.  Let $f: \mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R$ be $f(x) = 2x$, $g: \mathbb R^+ \rightarrow \mathbb R$ be $g(y) = ln(y)$, $h: \mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R$ be $h(z) = z - 10$.   Then $((f \circ g) \circ h)(x) = ln(2x) - 10 = (f \circ (g \circ h))(x)$, with dom$((f \circ g) \circ h) = \mathbb R^+$ = dom$(f \circ (g \circ h))$.  As a result, we need to set dom$f = \mathbb R^+$, range$f = \mathbb R^+$; dom$g$, range$g$, dom$h$, and range$h$ remain the same.  Am I allowed to do that?  This adjustment implies that when we say dom$f = X$, $f$ must be defined for all elements in $X$, but $X$ may not be the entire set of elements for which $f$ is defined. I've been using mkvmerge to merge a video file and subtitles, I'm using the following command  mkvmerge -o output.mkv video.mp4 subtitles.srt   Which is working fine but as you can probably guess this is really slow operation   I've to open terminal in every one of those directories where movies are stored. Then I've to copy and paste the names of the files in the command Then I've to rename the output file Then delete the original files which I used   This is a lengthy process.     Ideal situation that I want.   I'll go into the folder which contains a movie file and a subtitle file with the same name. I select a movie file and and a subtitles file, right click and run a nautilus script on them. They get merged Original file gets deleted. Rename the merged file with the name of the orignal file with mkv extension      This doesn't need to be recursive, I don't want my HDD creating and deleting 100's of files at ones. Movie files and Subtitle files generally have the same name but some times have "_en" post fixed to subtitle files. If you have another approach of doing it I'm on board with that too. Is there a way to turn option strict off for just a single line of code?    I'm doing some maintenance work and I need to "cheat" in just one place and I don't want to lower the standard for the entire file. If $|a| = 12, |b| = 22$ and $\langle a \rangle\cap \langle b\rangle \ne e$, prove that $a^6 = b^{11}$ Positioning of decorations on parallel lines I'm displayed three lines on a pgfplot. I want to show a marker for the slope of each line and the difference in height between lines.     I'm showing the slopes by adding triangles under the lines  (at a manual position) and placing an annotation inside the triangle (at a manual position). I'm showing the difference between the height of the lines by adding a brace manually as well.   How can I place the braces on the plot and anchor them at a certain point on each line? The triangles can be added at the end of each line declaration, but doing it like this is ok. The braces are put in place manually, which is not sustainable as I create more plots.   I want to avoid using xshift, yshiftand manual adjustment to put the braces,traingles and annotations in the right place. How can I do this?      \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pgfplots}  \pgfplotsset{compat=1.9}  \begin{document}   \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.45,trim axis left, trim axis right]     \begin{axis}[ylabel={$\hat{S(4)}$},xlabel={$S{^*}_{breakeven}$},ylabel style={rotate=-90},domain=1:25, legend style={legend pos=north west,font=\scriptsize}, legend cell align=left]  \addplot+[samples=200,mark=none]                                    {6.26 + 0.28*x} coordinate[pos=0.5](x) coordinate[pos=0.9] (y) (x)-| (y) node [midway,xshift=-0.6cm,yshift=0.3cm] {\footnotesize $Slope X$};;  \addplot+[samples=200,mark=none, dotted, thick]             {2.66 + 0.28*x}  coordinate[pos=0.3](a) coordinate[pos=0.6] (b) (a)-| (b) node [midway,xshift=-0.5cm,yshift=0.2cm] {\footnotesize $Slope 1$};  \draw [decorate,decoration={brace,amplitude=5pt,raise=4pt},xshift=4pt]  (225,107) -- (225,73)  node [midway,xshift=0.6cm] {\footnotesize $\beta_1$};  \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} How to reset Kali linux root password I have a series of ranges with start dates and end dates. I want to check to see if a date is within that range.  Date.before() and Date.after() seem to be a little awkward to use. What I really need is something like this pseudocode:  boolean isWithinRange(Date testDate) {     return testDate &gt;= startDate &amp;&amp; testDate &lt;= endDate; }   Not sure if it's relevant, but the dates I'm pulling from the database have timestamps. How do I change NEI to cheat mode? When I heard that you could look up recipes and cheat items with Not Enough Items, I downloaded NEI. It worked, and then I got another mod and the all of a sudden NEI still worked, but it was locked in recipe mode only. I tried fixing it by putting it into cheat mode again, but it was still in recipe mode.  I knew the only reason this happened was probably because of a change in the mod. Then I was watching a YouTuber who had the same exact mod as me and NEI was working and not locked in recipe mode for him. I tried redownloading NEI and getting it again but I was still stuck in recipe mode.  How do I get NEI in cheat mode? Permissions of /Users keep changing back to drwxrwxrwx Optimal step size in gradient descent Ellipsis in array initialization in C kernel module Cannot pickup Gauldur amulet fragment in Geirmund's Hall I am having trouble retrieving the Gauldur amulet fragment from Geirmund's Hall after clearing it before I was aware of this quest. Now when I return the quest indicator points on the floor in boss' room, specifically on a patch of submerged dirt. The water is quite shallow and I am quite sure that there is nothing to pick up there.  To me it seems the quest has bugged as I killed the boss before embarking on this quest, or killed him while unaware of the quest and not picking the fragment up. How can I get around this? Is there a console command which can help me? My fish's native habitat is rice fields. My fish's native habitat are rice fields.   Which one is correct? I'm pretty sure it's the first, since 'is' modifies 'habitat,' but it still sounds weird... Using Apex Managed Sharing to share an opportunity Here's the use case. When a lead is converted to an Opportunity, I want to automatically share the opportunity with the previous owner of the lead. This is needed because upon conversion, the opportunity ownership is granted to someone else but the original lead owner needs ongoing access to the opportunity.  So:   A partner submits/creates a lead and is the lead owner Lead is converted to opportunity and internal sales person gains ownership Original partner needs to have view/edit access on this opportunity   I know you can use Apex Managed Sharing to share a custom object, but I'm hitting a wall trying to do this with an opportunity since the fields in OpportunityShare are not writable. The following won't even compile as a result:  List&lt;OpportunityShare&gt; oppShares = new List&lt;OpportunityShare&gt;(); for(Id i : oppIds) {    OpportunityShare os = new OpportunityShare(OpportunityId = i);    os.OpportunityId = i; // *** ERROR - not writable ***    os.OpportunityAccessLevel = 'Read/Write';    os.UserOrGroupId = oppIdToLead.get(i).OwnerId;    os.RowCause = 'Manual Sharing';    oppShares.add(os); }  Database.SaveResult[] result = Database.insert(oppShares, false); Hi everyone I'm attempting to install spotify, I've been running linux for less than 24 hours so please cut me some slack if this seems trivial. Here is a link to the webpage  and the example script.         Add this line to your list of repositories by editing your /etc/apt/sources.list    deb http://repository.spotify.com stable non-free    If you want to verify the downloaded packages, you will need to add our public key  sudo apt-key adv --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80 --recv-keys 94558F59    Run apt-get update  sudo apt-get update    Install spotify!      sudo apt-get install spotify-client      would someone be nice enough to walk me through this? I'm not even sure where to start. I need help finding the set of continuous functions $f : \Bbb R \to \Bbb R$ such that for all $x \in \Bbb R$, the following integral converges:  $$\int_0^1 \frac {f(x+t) - f(x)} {t^2} \ \mathrm dt$$  I think it might be the set of constant functions but i havent been able to prove it :(   I was thinking that you can use the stone weiestrass theorem considering the set of continuous functions on a closed  interval(non trivial) ,and a subset which contains the set of continuous functions whose integral above diverges in some point in that interval along with  with the set of constant functions. So in order to solve the problem i need only to prove that if two functions do not meet the condition of the problem then their product does not as well .  I hope you can provide some insight and thank you . Does the rank-nullity theorem hold for infinite dimensional $V$? I am new to blender. Pressing &#9096; Ctrl&#9095; AltQ opens the quad view. How to maximize any one of the four views of the quad view? Are there non-legal consequences for wizards that meddle with time?