Mysql crashing/restarting, InnoDB: Unable to lock ./ibdata1. Can't kill via 'stop';
Mysql crashed, dumped DB's in recovery mode. What now?
What will Sony do if someone uses my account as primary on another ps4 without my knowledge? What will Sony do if someone uses my account as primary on another ps4 without my knowledge? Will the account be banned? Or will the other guy that has my account as primary be banned? After how long? I have no credit card on my account so I don't care too much but I want to know.   He uses my account on his ps4 as a primary account. I think to use my digital games as free (Sharing, but without my knowledge). Can you use your off-handed weapon for your main attack action? My friend is 2 weapon fighting a flesh golem. He has one sword that does lightning damage, and one sword that does fire damage. His right hand holds the lightning sword, and his left hand holds the fire sword.  My friend wants to attack with his left hand because lightning heals the golem. However, the DM says that because his left hand is his left hand, he can't use it as his "main" hand, and only attack with it. Is this rules as written/intended? What expression would be the opposite of "Deal Breaker"? I understand that "Deal breaker" is an expression used for a feature/characteristic that would make one not go for a deal (or terminate a contract), even if the deal's other features are great.  What expression would be the opposite of "Deal Breaker"? I'm looking for an existing expression that would describe a feature that would make one go for the deal, even if there are other not so great characteristics.  The expression could fill the sentence below:     I know this phone carrier has higher rates and everything, but if   they are offering free iPhone to us if we switch, that would be a &lt;expression   here&gt;! We would totally go for it. How do I install a .tar.gz (or .tar.bz2) file? Unable to send mail to hotmail from rackspace cloud Greiner in his book "Field Quantization" page 173, eq.(7.11) did this calculation:     ${\mathcal L}^\prime=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\nu A^\mu-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A^\mu\partial_\nu A^\nu $   $\space\space\space\space=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu+\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu[A_\nu(\partial^\nu A^\mu)-(\partial_\nu A^\nu) A^\mu]$        The last term is a four-divergence which has no influence on the field equations. Thus the dynamics of the electromagnetic field (in the Lorentz gauge) can be described by the simple Lagrangian        ${\mathcal L}^{\prime\prime}=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu A_\nu\partial^\mu A^\nu$     Yes, if it is a four-divergence of a vector whose 0-component doesn't contain time derivatives of the field, indeed according to the variational principle this four-divergence will not influence the field equation.  And actually I calculated the time-derivative dependence of 0-component of $[A_\nu(\partial^\nu A^\mu)-(\partial_\nu A^\nu) A^\mu]$, in which only $[A_0(\partial^0 A^0)-(\partial_0 A^0) A^0]$ could possibly contain time-derivative, which vanishes fortunately, so whatever the general case it doesn't matter in this present case.  But how can he seem to claim that it holds for a general four-divergence term,The last term is a four-divergence which has no influence on the field equations?  EDIT: I only assumed the boundary condition to be $A^\mu=0$ at spatial infinity, not at time infinity. And the variation of the action $S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}L \, dt$ is due to the variation of fields which vanish at time, $\delta A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_1)=\delta A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_2)=0$, not having the knowledge of $\delta \dot A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_1)$ and $\delta \dot A^\mu(\mathbf x,t_2)$, which don't vanish generally, so the four-divergence term will in general contribute to the action, $$\delta S_j=\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\int d^3\mathbf x \partial_\mu j(A(x),\nabla A(x),\dot A(x))^\mu =\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2}dt\int d^3\mathbf x \dot j^0 =\int d^3\mathbf x [\delta j(\mathbf x, t_2)^0-\delta j(\mathbf x, t_1)^0]$$ which does not vanish in general! If I have a PATH variable that (when exploded onto multiple lines) contains something like this (with a few notes added by me):  /Users/brandon/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p353/bin /Users/brandon/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p353@global/bin /Users/brandon/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p353/bin /opt/local/bin /opt/local/sbin /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/bin   # &lt;&lt;--- notice this path appears again later /usr/bin         # &lt;&lt;--- notice this comes AFTER /usr/local/bin /bin /usr/sbin /sbin /usr/local/bin   # &lt;&lt;--- here it is again! /usr/local/git/bin /Users/brandon/bin /Users/brandon/.homebrew/bin /usr/local/mysql/bin /usr/local/share/npm/bin /Applications/Postgres93.app/Contents/MacOS/bin /Users/brandon/.rvm/bin   is it possible for the presence of the second /usr/local/bin/ to cause the /usr/bin to take precedence over /usr/local/bin?  This seems crazy (to me: I've never heard of such a thing) but that's exactly the behavior I'm seeing.  I've just installed PHP with Homebrew, and yet the system PHP (from /usr/bin) is taking precedence:  $ which php /usr/bin/php   BUT, after manually altering the PATH (rather than digging through all the files sourced by my .zshrc to try to figure out why &amp; where the duplication is coming from) to remove the second instance of /usr/local/bin, I find that /usr/local/bin is taking precedence over /usr/bin as I would have expected it to in the first place:  $ which php /usr/local/bin/php   What would cause this?  Is this normal? Ubuntu won't boot because of lvmetad I've followed this tutorial to install Ubuntu 15.10:    After restarting my computer I got to the grub menu and chose Ubuntu. Shortly after that I got this error:  /run/lvm/lvmetad.socket: connect failed: No such file or directory WARNING: Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to internal scanning.   These messages keep adding up on a black screen every second. After a while,  I get access to the initramfs ash console.  what am I doing wrong? How to create a Facebook page without a personal account In the past, Facebook used to let business create pages or apps without a personal account. This account created in the page/app creation process had limited capacities and could be switch to a full personal account after—if needed (irreversible).  But today, if I want to create a page for a new brand, without having a Facebook account, it seems I can’t anymore. And I can’t find any communication from Facebook regarding this change.   Anybody has any info? Is it still possible (in a new way maybe)? Alt-C not working in Blender 2.8 I want to convert my text object to mesh. In 2.79 it was Alt-C, are the keys changed for 2.80?    I browsed it externally and I got some thing like this image as answer..   but any shortcut-keys will be easy to work! If you know one, you can comment below. I opened a can of sliced black olives for my pizza and only used half. I put the leftovers into a sealed container with the liquid and put it in the fridge. Under those conditions how long will the olives last? Is there a better way to store leftover olives? Creating a virtual microphone I read the following dev email  and when i read this part:  Note that this does not completely remove the ability for extensions (e.g. Dropbox) to add emblems programmatically by using the libnautilus-extension library, just the user-added emblems from the properties dialog/emblems sidebar.   There is ability to bring emblems programmatically. So, How can i use libnautilus-extension library to add some emblems like Dropbox does? Or is there any tweak tool for this? Does metric signature affect the stress energy tensor? If one were to derive the stress-energy tensor for a metric with $(+,-,-,-)$ signature would it be different from the stress-energy tensor derived from the same metric but with $(-,+,+,+)$ signature? How do I set a background image while I am editing? How do I put a backdrop behind the model that I am creating so that I can compare the picture to the model while editing? Series about being that could change sex and age - "The Morph*" I'm trying to remember information about a series of three books I read in the early 1980's (first book could have been published in the 1970's). The book featured a character who was a scientific creation of some sort. It was (initially, I believe) an assassin, and had the ultimate getaway scheme; with effort, it could change its body, becoming about 10 years younger and switching sex. It changed 4 or 5 times in the first book, coming down from a senior citizen to someone in their teens or twenties; in the second and third books, it changed once per book (by the last book, it was a child or a young teenager).  The first book was title something like "The Morph..." where whatever the word was that started with "Morph" was this creature. No recollection of the author's name, or the titles of the other two books.  I think the cover of the first book was predominantly yellow, with black silhouettes representing the character at the four ages seen in the book, and a black title. And/or, the book might have been published by DAW (all their books at the time had yellow spines with black letters). Let $R$ be a commutative ring with identity. Show that $R$ is a field if and only if the only ideals of $R$ are $R$ itself and the zero ideal $(0)$.  I can't figure out where to start other that I need to prove some biconditional statement. Any help? What techniques have been used to repeat geometry or other detail to the infinite horizon? When I composed my     I would have liked to have the camera pitch up enough to show the horizon, except I didn't have enough geometry to extend the cobblestone street and the sidewalk all the way to infinity (mostly because that would require infinite stuff).  Even in that shot it is clear that I need to widen the "sidewalk" to cover up the "sky"box.    Contrast with     where the ray tracer can use the procedurally replicated geometry.   is a failed attempt at faking out the horizon, even with low detail.  It fails because lighting's interaction with the geometry gives it away.  Some techniques that prevent you from having to deal with infinity include   put the scene in a box (usually a room) put the scene in a canyon (which is just a box without a top so you can see the relatively featureless sky) route the road into a tunnel, or around a corner and hide the horizon with other geometry (which is really just a variant on the canyon). have no detail on the ground at all (flat color or gradient)   Those are all dodging the question of interest to me:  What techniques have people used in blender to fake various kinds of detail repeating into the distance (instead of just obstructing the view of infinity)? How can I add motion to a rigid body? I'm trying to create a bowling animation and I want the ball to hit the pins. I already added the Rigid Body physics to the objects but can't get the ball to move.  Obviously I could just add keyframes but   that seems to interfere with the Rigid Body physics it doesn't look too realistic.   Is there a way to add some kind of motion to the ball? In C# check that filename is *possibly* valid (not that it exists) Is there a method in the System.IO namespace that checks the validity of a filename?  For example, C:\foo\bar would validate and :"~-* would not  Or a little trickier, X:\foo\bar would validate is there is an X: drive on the system, but wouldn't otherwise.  I suppose I could write such a method myself, but I'm more interested in a built-in one.