Is it possible to frame a group of cells?
Framing a combination of cells in the notebook
My thinking:    acceleration corresponds to a force which is instantaneous, so the acceleration of a rigid body can be rather spiky (non-smooth) velocity (angular velocity) describes the ratio of change of the distance(angle), so it is smooth in the real world.   Conclusion, it makes sense to  (e.g., simple averaging) a velocity signal (temporal velocity), but it does not make so much sense to do smoothing on acceleration signal. Am I right? In Breaking Bad, Walter White chooses to go by Heisenberg. I know that there has to be some significance behind both why Walt chose the name and why the writers chose that name as opposed to any other physicist's. It would make sense for it to have something to do with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which postulates (in broad strokes) that any system is fundamentally unstable on a short enough time frame. The connection between that and Walt's specific character eludes me though. Edits on closed posts Should questions or answers on questions that are closed be edited, even if the question is closed and the edit does not change anything about the reason it's closed? Example:  was just edited, which I saw in the review queue. It certainly improves the answer, but since the answer doesn't really have to exist on SE at all (because the question is off-topic), should this edit be made? In my understanding, the only reason that the edit option for a closed question is not greyed out is so that it can be edited to make it comply with the SE rules. How do I contact other users? How can I contact another user, if that user has not specified any contact details in their profile? How can I uninstall software? Seeing there are various ways to install on Ubuntu. What are the various ways to uninstall items?  Which ways always work? How can I be sure something was uninstalled? Over time, I've noticed an increasing practice among moderators of the smaller sites (i.e. not in the Trilogy) to move extended comment chains to chat, just because they're too long. Is this a good idea? In the past, I've taken the position on many occasions that I believe that comments serve two purposes only: clarification, and asking for clarification.  I take this position because as a mod I want the freedom to purge a comment trail that is clearly running off the rails without having to argue with anyone about politeness definitions. But that's not the same thing as two pedantic C++ language lawyers debating the finer points of &quot;undefined behavior.&quot;  I give wide latitude to such discussions, as long as the participants don't start throwing spears, because I believe they are instructive. The SE software even has accommodations for this.  Long comment chains are automatically collapsed, so as not to disrupt the Q&amp;A format of the post.  And moving a comment chain to chat is not even a move, really; to do an actual move, you have to perform the conversion, and then delete all of the copied comments from the post. Here is a recent example:  and it's accompanying . What I find amusing is that the OP's detailed POV about the term, where he floats a theory about why everyone thinks that &quot;bugged&quot; is not a thing (that conversation took place in the comments, and is now safely sequestered in the chat room) gets to stay prominently featured in his question, at the very top of the post. Now you could argue that the chat room is a better environment to have these discussions anyway, and you'd be right.  I could argue that if we're going to do that, then why not just automatically convert long discussions to chat rooms? The problem is not so much where the comments reside.  I don't understand why mods are taking it on themselves to fix something that isn't hurting the site (at least in my opinion).  In addition, every time I see this happen, the participants in the conversation immediately lose interest in it.  The only comment that was posted in that room after all the comments were moved is most likely this one:  It wouldn't surprise me if the folks using &quot;bugged&quot; to refer to a certain software quality are the same folks who refer to their programs as &quot;codes&quot; and who believe textspeak is the pinnacle of modern English.  Which nobody will ever see. :) Some mods are really aggressive about this.  I discussed this with a mod on Physics, and he told me that they routinely move discussions when they think they might run off the rails. $ KC $ spaces imply $ US $ spaces , but vise versa is false. What are the maximum bag space and Pokemon storage? How many upgrades are needed to reach the limits? $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} f_{n}(x) = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}f_{n}(x) $ in case of uniform convergence of $f_{n}(x)$ to $f(x)$  I used this while I was given that $f_{n}(x)$ converges to $f(x)$ uniformly. Is this correct and I was also thinking to prove this! Why would I open a low-rate 9 month CD instead of a higher rate savings account? One specific (popular online) bank is offering a 9 month 1.25% CD, while it's savings account is 1.90%.  There's no way I see interest rates tumbling in the next nine months, so why should I -- why should anyone -- get a 1.25% CD when savings accounts are paying 52% more interest?  (This question is not specific to this particular bank at this particular time.  It's about the general practice of buying low-rate CDs when savings accounts have a higher rate.) Tracking down where disk space has gone on Linux? When administering Linux systems I often find myself struggling to track down the culprit after a partition goes full. I normally use du / | sort -nr but on a large filesystem this takes a long time before any results are returned.  Also, this is usually successful in highlighting the worst offender but I've often found myself resorting to du without the sort in more subtle cases and then had to trawl through the output.  I'd prefer a command line solution which relies on standard Linux commands since I have to administer quite a few systems and installing new software is a hassle (especially when out of disk space!) If $\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt\rightarrow \infty$ as $|x|\rightarrow \infty\;,$ Then every line $y=mx$ Intersect $ y^2+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2$ If $f$ is a continuous function with $\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt\rightarrow \infty$ as $|x|\rightarrow \infty\;,$ Then show that every line $y=mx$ Intersect the curve $\displaystyle y^2+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2$  $\bf{My\; Try::}$ Put $y=mx$ in $$\displaystyle y^2+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2\;,$$ We get $$\displaystyle m^2x^2+y^2+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2.$$ We can write it as $$\displaystyle 2\int_{0}^{x}2m^2tdt+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2$$ So $$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x}\left[2m^2t+f(t)\right]dt-2 =0$$ Now Let $$g(x) = \displaystyle \int_{0}^{x}\left[2m^2t+f(t)\right]dt-2.\;,$$ When $x\rightarrow \infty\;,$ Then $g(x)\rightarrow \infty.$ (Where $g(x)$ is an Continuous function.) Now I did not Understand How can i solve that, Help me Thanks I've just started to play with pgfplot. I'm trying to prepare a plot like to following   \begin{figure}[h] \centering \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[minor tick num=1,  axis x line=middle, axis y line=middle, xlabel=$k$, ylabel=$\omega$, ymin=0,xmin=-2,ymax=60] \addplot[blue,domain=0:5, line width=1.5pt] {x^2+25}; \addplot[orange,domain=0:5,line width=1pt]{3*x+22.75}; \addplot[cyan,domain=0:1.5, line width=1pt,dashed]{18.166*x}; \node[coordinate,pin=right:{$v_{\phi}=\frac{\omega}{k}$}]     at (axis cs:1,17) {}; \node[coordinate,pin=right:{$v_{g}=\frac{d\omega}{dk}$}]     at (axis cs:2.5,30) {}; \node[coordinate,pin=left:{dispersion relation}]     at (axis cs:4.5,47) {}; \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture} \caption{Wave dispersion relation with phase and group velocity} \label{fig:2} \end{figure}   What I would like to do is dropping the x-y tick labels so that we just maintaing the x-y title. How can I obtain it? Polygamma reflection formula lim sup inequality $\limsup ( a_n b_n ) \leq \limsup a_n \limsup b_n $ I´m not sure how to start with this proof, how can I do it? $$ \limsup ( a_n b_n ) \leqslant \limsup a_n \limsup b_n  $$ I also have to prove, if $ \lim a_n $ exists then: $$ \limsup ( a_n b_n  ) = \limsup a_n \limsup b_n  $$ Help please, it´s not a homework I want to learn. How to avoid modifications during pg_dumpall lognormal distribution, standard-deviation and (physical) units I have a distribution of microparticles that follows a lognormal distribution. The cumulative distribution function thus is given by:  $$ F_X(x;\mu,\sigma) = \frac12 \operatorname{erfc}\!\left(-\frac{\ln x - \mu}{\sigma\sqrt{2}}\right) $$ $$ \mu = ln(M) + \sigma^2 $$  Now, the plot of the distribution function should be exactly the same no matter if the particle diameter $x$ is given in micrometers or meters (as long as I adapt the x-axis accordingly of course). However, this only works if I only convert $x$ and $M$, while not touching the numerical value of $\sigma$, and I don't understand why. $F_X$ has to be unitless, so $x$, $\mu$ and $\sigma$ should all have the same unit, right? Please help me to stop auto login in Skype. There is an account that is always login again and again, although I chose to logout and sign in with another Skype name. I tried on Settings/applications/Skype to kill the account and to quit synchronise, but still whenever I open Skype again, I'm logging in automatically. I am trying to run gedit from an SSH terminal on Windows, connected to an Amazon EC2 instance running Ubuntu 12.04 Server and I am getting this error:  Cannot open display:   How do I fix it? I made a character, and its one of my first times texturing, and I saved my character into a new folder, and when I came back to the model ALL the textures were pink, I used to know what to do, but I stopped texturing, how do I bring my textures back?