Why printing a int static value gives object notation value, instead of actual value
What's the simplest way to print a Java array?
How can I use an array of function pointers? How should I use array of function pointers in C?  How can I initialize them? Replacing ArcPy with ArcGIS API for Python? Today I found out about the . I was wondering if you could use this to (eventually) replace ArcPy?  Recently I have been doing analyses that require cloud based solutions. When using AWS, Docker and Jupyter it is very convenient to stick with a Unix based OS such as Ubuntu. However, the Unix alternatives for ArcGIS have their own limitations as well such as the always hard to install python bindings for the  GDAL library. ArcGIS for Python operates cross platform.  Perhaps there are the things I should and should not expect from the ArcGIS API for Python.  Perhaps Arcpy is going to disappear altogether. Ubuntu 20.04 on DualBoot fail 90% of tries - Initramfs unpacking failed: Decoding failed Returning multiple values from a C++ function Is there a preferred way to return multiple values from a C++ function?  For example, imagine a function that divides two integers and returns both the quotient and the remainder.  One way I commonly see is to use reference parameters:  void divide(int dividend, int divisor, int&amp; quotient, int&amp; remainder);   A variation is to return one value and pass the other through a reference parameter:  int divide(int dividend, int divisor, int&amp; remainder);   Another way would be to declare a struct to contain all of the results and return that:  struct divide_result {     int quotient;     int remainder; };  divide_result divide(int dividend, int divisor);   Is one of these ways generally preferred, or are there other suggestions?  Edit: In the real-world code, there may be more than two results.  They may also be of different types. TikZ rectangular node with different rounded corners We always say that tree levels are classical but loop diagrams are quantum.  Let's talk about a concrete example： $$\mathcal{L}=\partial_a \phi\partial^a \phi-\frac{g}{4}\phi^4+\phi J$$ where $J$ is source.   The equation of motion is $$\Box \phi=-g \phi^3+J$$  Let's do perturbation, $\phi=\sum \phi_{n}$ and $\phi_n \sim \mathcal{O}(g^n) $. And define Green function $G(x)$ as $$\Box G(x) =\delta^4(x)$$  Then   Zero order:  $\Box \phi_0 = J$   $\phi_0(x)=\int d^4y G(x-y) J(y) $  This solution corresponds to the following diagram:  First order:  $\Box \phi_1 = -g \phi_0^3   $  $\phi_1(x)=-g \int d^4x_1 d^4x_2 d^4x_3 d^4x_4 G(x-x_1)G(x_1-x_2)G(x_1-x_3)G(x_1-x_4)J(x_2)J(x_3)J(x_4) $  This solution corresponds to the following diagram:  Second order:  $\Box \phi_2 = -3g \phi_0^2\phi_1  $  $\phi_2(x)= 3g^2 \int d^4x_1 d^4x_2 d^4x_3 d^4x_4 d^4x_5 d^4yd^4z  G(x-y)G(y-x_1)G(y-x_2)G(y-z)G(z-x_3)G(z-x_4)G(z-x_5) J(x_1)J(x_2)J(x_3)J(x_4)J(x_5) $ This solution corresponds to the following diagram:  Therefore, we've proved in brute force that up to 2nd order, only tree level diagram make contribution.  However in principle the first order can have the loop diagram, such as  but it really does not occur in above classical calculation.  My question is:   What's the crucial point in classical calculation, which forbids the loop diagram to occur? Because the classical calculation seems similiar with quantum calculation. How to prove the general claim rigorously that loop diagram will not occur in above classical perturbative calculation. Finding limit of a sequence in product form \begin{equation} \prod_{n=2}^{\infty} \left (1-\frac{2}{n(n+1)}  \right )^2 \end{equation}  I need to find limit for the following product..answer is $\frac{1}{9}$.  I have tried cancelling out but can't figure out.  Its a monotonically decreasing sequence so will converge to its infimum.. how to find the infimum? I'm using BibLaTeX to handle my bibliography and I want a reference to be placed in a footnote on every page where I cite the same work and have the same number. Also I want to be able to cite the same work on one page several times. The latter could be done by using  from the Joseph Wright's blog. However, it puts a reference in a footnote only once. Suppose you do bad in undergraduate school in say computer science. But you do very well in a masters program in computer science. If you want to apply to a PhD program in computer science, will the masters degree grades offset the undergraduate degree grades? How to count entities with commands/check if there are only one or a certain number of entities or players left? I want to run a command when there are only 10 entities left. I know you can use /execute unless entity to detect when all matching mobs have died, but it doesn't work if you want to run a command when there are for example 10 entities left.  A command like /execute if entity @e[limit=10] does not work, it also triggers if there is only one entity.  Such a counting system could also be used to determine once there is only one player left in an arena, meaning they have won a battle or similar. Changing colors of lightning-button How can I change the colors of lightning-button?  I tried doing this in my css:  .my-button {     background-color: #14a6bc;     color: #ffffff; }   and applying that class to my &lt;lightning-button&gt; and removing the variant but I still get the base colors? I am trying to use these examples: Sequence of positive integers such that their reciprocals are in arithmetic progression Changing order of features in shapefile I have a shapefile and I want to change the order of the features. Is that possible? I want to sort the features in the shapefile because I'm embedding this shapefile in a mobile app. The app will display a list of features, and although I could do the sorting at load time, I'd prefer to have them sorted. Metrizable topological space $X$ with every admissible metric complete then $X$ is compact How to prove:      If $X$ is a metrizable topological space and every admissible metric on $X$ is complete then $X$ is compact.    I was trying with an idea of contradiction and thereby to construct an incomplete metric on $X$. But not able to construct. error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before 'type' Restore the state of std::cout after manipulating it In Terraria I often try to defeat spazmatism first, but when he transformed, his flamethrower killed me. What is easiest way to kill The Twins? Thomson et al. provide a proof that $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \sqrt[n]{n}=1$ in . It has to do with using an inequality that relies on the binomial theorem:  I have an alternative proof that I know (from elsewhere) as follows.  Proof. \begin{align} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{ \log n}{n} = 0 \end{align} Then using this, I can instead prove: \begin{align} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \sqrt[n]{n} &amp;= \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \exp{\frac{ \log n}{n}} \newline &amp; = \exp{0} \newline &amp; = 1 \end{align}  On the one hand, it seems like a valid proof to me. On the other hand, I know I should be careful with infinite sequences. The step I'm most unsure of is: \begin{align} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \sqrt[n]{n} = \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \exp{\frac{ \log n}{n}} \end{align} I know such an identity would hold for bounded $n$ but I'm not sure I can use this identity when $n\rightarrow \infty$. Question: If I am correct, then would there be any cases where I would be wrong? Specifically, given any sequence $x_n$, can I always assume: \begin{align} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} x_n = \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \exp(\log x_n) \end{align} Or are there sequences that invalidate that identity?  (Edited to expand the last question) given any sequence $x_n$, can I always assume: \begin{align} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} x_n &amp;=  \exp(\log \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} x_n) \newline &amp;=  \exp(\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \log x_n) \newline &amp;=  \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \exp( \log x_n) \end{align} Or are there sequences that invalidate any of the above identities? (Edited to repurpose this question). Please also feel free to add different proofs of $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \sqrt[n]{n}=1$. Why did the Nazgûl not attack a second time at Weathertop? How does "curved space" explain gravitational attraction? They say that gravity is technically not a real force and that it's caused by objects traveling a straight path through curved space, and that space becomes curved by mass, giving the illusion of a force of gravity.  That makes perfect sense for planetary orbits, but a lot less sense for the expression of gravity that we are the most familiar with in our day-to-day lives: "what goes up must come down."  Imagine that I hold a ball in my hand, several feet off the ground, with my fingers curled around it, and my hand is above the ball.  Then I open my fingers, releasing my grip on it, being very careful to not impart any momentum to the ball from my hand as I do so.  An object at rest remains at rest unless acted upon by an outside force.  If the ball is not moving (relative to my inertial reference frame), it has no path to travel that's any different from the Earth's path through space.  It should remain at rest, hanging there in the air.  And yet it falls, demonstrating that an outside force (gravity) did indeed act upon it.  How does curved space explain this?