Power-over-ethernet to non-PoE device
Can I connect a PC to a PoE switch?
I have studied some of Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, and I understand that it states that gravity isn't a force but rather the effects of objects curving space-time. If this is true, then why are we instructed in middle school that it is a force? Why isn't an upgrade to 20.04 from 18.04 available yet? Why square the difference instead of taking the absolute value in standard deviation? Given a number, how do I discover in what table and column it could be found within? I don't care if it's fast, it just needs to work. How to change ubuntu install from legacy to uefi Sorting list based on values from another list Power failure during upgrade During upgrade from 12.04 to 12.10 there was a power failure.  computer boots to desktop but without tools and menus to navigate.  files that can be open cannot be closed.  sidebar menu does not exist.  there is no function of the DVD drive, the USB drive nor the internet.  Possible to open GRUB but I am not familiar with it's function.  Please help. Do I need a visa for Paris, if my connecting flight stops for 24 hours in Paris? Do I need visa for Paris, if my connecting flight stops at Paris for 24hrs and I want to visit Paris during that 24hrs? I have US B1 visa. I'll be travelling from San Francisco to Bangalore (India) via Paris. I hold Indian passport. If yes, what is the procedure for that visa? I have to prove that $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+n^2\right)^{\frac1n}$$ converges and give its limit. What I did was the following: $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+n^2\right)^\frac{1}{n} = \lim_{n\to\infty}(n^2)^{\frac1n}\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac1{n^2} + 1\right)^\frac1n= \lim_{n\to\infty}(n^2)^{\frac1n}$$ Now that is where I am stuck - how to I continue with $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(n^2)^{\frac{1}{n}}$? I really don't have any ideas left... Thank you very much! FunkyPeanut First week of August in Scotland : What kind of clothes to pack? In a couple of weeks I will be going to Edinburgh, Scotland. I've been told that the weather is very unpredictable throughout the year. Can you suggest what I should pack as regards clothes? Suppose $A$ and $B$ are similar matrices. Show that $A$ and $B$ have the same eigenvalues with the same geometric multiplicities.      Similar matrices: Suppose $A$ and $B$ are $n\times n$ matrices over $\mathbb R$ or $\mathbb C$. We say $A$ and $B$ are similar, or that $A$ is similar to $B$, if there exists a matrix $P$ such that $B = P^{-1}AP$. I have read that controlling FDR is less stringent than controlling FWER, such as in :     FDR controlling procedures exert a less stringent control over false discovery compared to familywise error rate (FWER) procedures (such as the Bonferroni correction). This increases power at the cost of increasing the rate of type I errors, i.e., rejecting the null hypothesis of no effect when it should be accepted.   But I was wondering how it is shown to be true mathematically?  Is there some relation between FDR and FWER? bibtex and genitive / possessive 's: the proper way to obtain "Kuran's (1989) model" Is there an automatic way to attach a genitive apostrophe or " ' s " to an author's name?  Currently I use:  \citeauthor{kuran1989}'s \citeyear{kuran1989}   But since this comes up regularily I'd like to know whether there's a general solution. Intuition behind measurable random variables and $\sigma$-algebra I've been trying to understand $\sigma$-algebras and how it encodes information in context of filtration. While certain parts seem clear and logical, I can't say I get the whole picture.  I'll try to explain the counter-intuition I get with the classical example of : the probability space $\Omega = \{ HH, HT, TH, TT \}$ and a r.v. $X(\omega)$ equal to the number of heads.  At times $0$, $1$ and $2$ the available information is represented using $\sigma$-algebras $\mathcal{F}_0=\{\emptyset,\Omega\}$, $\mathcal{F}_1=\{\emptyset, \Omega, \{HH,HT\},\{TH,TT\}\}$ and $\mathcal{F}_2=\{\emptyset, \Omega,\{HH,HT\},\{TH,TT\},\{HH\},\{HT\},\{TH\},\{TT\}\}$.  One can notice that $X(\omega)$ is not measurable with respect to $\mathcal{F}_0$ and $\mathcal{F}_1$, because $X^{-1}((\frac{3}{2}; +\infty))=\{HH\}$. To me it is quite surprising: intuitively $X$ makes perfect sense at all times. In particular it has an expected value at time $0$, which I interpret as that the probability and value of all outcomes $\{\omega\}$ can be computed. How do you think of a non-measurable function?  Here's another way of expressing the same confusion. The most natural choice of $\sigma$-algebra in a finite discrete case is $\mathcal{F}=2^\Omega$, and it is implicitly used in all elementary probability problems. However, this choice of $\mathcal{F}$ does not reflect the fact that some information is known or unknown, conditional probability does. Does it mean that the statement "$\sigma$-algebra is known information" make sense only in conditioning? Why is it convenient then? I can't figure how to print the string "-n" with the over 30 years-old command echo.  I tried these:  Michaels:Scripts$ echo -n Michaels:Scripts$ echo "-n" Michaels:Scripts$ echo -e "-n" Michaels:Scripts$ echo -- -n -- -n Michaels:Script$ echo -- "-n" -- -n Michaels:Script$ echo "\-n" \-n   I use Mac OS X ML. I consider this behaviour very weird and unexpected. USB stick mysteriously become write protected So, somehow over the weekend, my 1GB USB flash drive has managed to become write-protected.  There is no switch on the stick, so I'm concluding that something has corrupted at some point.  Obviously I can't format it or remove.  The output from dmesg | tail is:  Buffer I/O error on device sdb1, logical block 328168 lost page write due to I/O error on sdb1 sd 73:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled sense code sd 73:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE sd 73:0:0:0: [sdb] Sense Key : Data Protect [current] Info fld=0x0 sd 73:0:0:0: [sdb] Add. Sense: Write protected sd 73:0:0:0: [sdb] CDB: Write(10): 2a 00 00 05 08 00 00 00 01 00 Buffer I/O error on device sdb1, logical block 328200 lost page write due to I/O error on sdb1   I think the second and final lines are a giveaway to corruption, but I don't know how to interpret this output.  Could someone help to see if this output gives any indication?  I usually eject the drive before removing it, but I may have been lax once or twice.  The data isn't critical, it's just bugging me.  Any suggestions on how to fix it (if the drive even can be) would be greatly appreciated. elementary row operation change the eigenvalue of a matrix I know that elementary row operations may change the eigenvalues of a matrix, but if these operations don't change the determinant, why should change the eigenvalues??  Thanks Prove $\alpha \in R[[x]]$ is a unit iff $a_0 \in R$ is a unit Prove $\alpha \in R[[x]]$ is a unit iff $a_0 \in R$ is a unit.   $"\Rightarrow"$ suppose $\alpha \in R[[x]]$ is a unit, where $\alpha = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_nx^n$  then there exists an inverse $\beta = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_nx^n$   stuck at this spot,  $(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_nx^n)(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_nx^n) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(\sum_{k=0}^{n}(a_kb_{n-k}))x^n$  A little mixed up on how this becomes $1 = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}e_nx^n$ where $e_0 =1, e_{n&gt;0} = 0$ and why that would make $a_0b_0 = 1$ which would make $a_0 \in R$ a unit. I haven't tried the other direction yet.  EDIT  Maybe I get it, because we assumed this sum is a unit then its inverse exists and so the $x^0=1$ and all $a_ib_i=1$ thus $a_0b_0=1$ which gives $a_0$ is a unit in $R$ Sobolev inequality If $f\in H^2(\mathbb R^2)$, I want to show that    $||f||_{L^\infty}\le c||f||_{H^2}$ $||f||_{L^\infty}\le c||f||_{H^1} [1+\ln(1+||f||_{H^2})]$   For 1, I use $||f||_{L^\infty}\le \sup_{x\in \mathbb R^2} |f|\le\int_{\mathbb R^2} |\hat f(\xi)|d\xi = \int(1+|\xi|^2)^{-1}(1+|\xi|^2)|\hat f(\xi)|d\xi \le (\int (1+|\xi|^2)^{-2}d\xi)^2(\text {which is integrable in this case})||f||_{H^2}\to \text{is this correct?}$   But for 2, I am stucked. How can I get the "ln"? and how can I make it into a product of $H^1$ and $H^2$ norm? I've read a new study which suggests that yawning may help you keep a cool head. Also, the findings might hold some hope for sufferers of insomnia, migraines, and even epilepsy.  Is there any conclusion about what the function of yawning is and why do we yawn?