Is it wise to install WAMP on Windows VPS in order to make use of already written PHP application?
Why not use a WAMP stack?
Punctuation in an indirect quotation Consider the brief passage:     "I love your work, but calling you 'the artist' {1} just doesn't seem to be   cutting it anymore. What shall I call you?"      "OK. Call me George." {2}   So my instincts tell me to put {1} in single quotes as opposed to no punctuation (or perhaps even italics) but to do the opposite for {2}. Is this right? Why?  Let me expand this one further iteration:     "Wow, that's a great name, especially with this crowd. Maybe for your next book    you should call yourself Ringo."{3} My multiple regression analysis model has a statistically significant F value however all beta values are statistically non-significant.   All the regression assumptions are met. No multicollinearity was found. Correlations among all predictors are all less than 0.60.   What else might be the cause of the insignificant predictors? I am travelling to Athens, Greece, shortly, and have seen . Should I be worried? Should I cancel my trip?  Update  It's fine, taxis are currently on strike, but Syntagma Sqaure is fine: Shells have a useful feature where pressing the keyboard UP arrow replaces the contents of the current command line with the previous command that was entered. (And if you do it again, the command before that, and so on.)  I would like a similar feature, where pressing (some other button) replaces the contents of the current command line with the last line of output from the previous command (and if you do it again, the previous line of output , and so on.)  Is there any shell that provides a feature like this?  The motivation is that you often want to run a command, and then run another command with part of the previous commands's output as input. (No, I don't want to do anything involving piping the output of one command into the next. I'm looking for an interactive experience, where you run the first command, see its output, and then get a line of that output into your next command, without having to reach for the mouse to do a clumsy copy-and-paste.) Question about repeating decimal? For simple fraction, we can easily convert it to repeating decimal by calculator. Ex. $\frac 1 3 = 0.33333\ldots$, $\frac 1 7=0.(142857),\ldots$ But some fraction fraction like $10/29, 1/97,...$ The repeating part of them are too long, so it can't fully show on the calculator. So is there any algorithm  to find the repeating part for that fraction? I want to be able to login to a remote via ssh without having to enter the password all the time.   How do I set it up? Is a different command required to execute a password-less session? How do I drop an object to the sand? In order to show $e^{x+y}=e^{x}e^{y}$ by using Exponential Series, I got the following:   $$e^{x}e^{y}=\Big(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{x^n \over n!}\Big)\cdot \Big(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{y^n \over n!}\Big)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{k=0}^n{x^ky^n \over {k!n!}}$$  But, where should I go next to get $e^{x+y}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{(x+y)^n \over n!}$.  Thanks in advance. Why is Buoyant Force $V\rho g$? For a submerged object, buoyant force ($F_b$) is defined as:  $$F_b = V_{\text{submerged}} \times \rho \text{ (density)} \times g \text{ (gravitational constant)}$$   Conceptually, the buoyant force equation says that buoyant force exerted is equal to the weight of the volume of water a given object displaced. Why? I went online to   and found the following explanation, but it seems like non-sequitur to me:      Explanation: When an object is removed, the volume that the object occupied will fill with fluid. This volume of fluid must be supported by the pressure of the surrounding liquid since a fluid can not support itself. When no object is present, the net upward force on this volume of fluid must equal to its weight, i.e. the weight of the fluid displaced. When the object is present, this same upward force will act on the object. Did regular Americans speak the way actors in the 30s and 1940s did? I watch a lot of old movies, and I've noticed that American actors of the 1930s and 1940s often spoke in a quasi-generic-posh-British accent.  Katherine Hepburn's accent would be the perfect example. It seems exaggerated, and I imagine it was not common off the stage and screen. What was that? Was it just an accent or was it a dialect? Did real people actually speak that way? Assigning CRS to shapefile when it doesn't have one, in R? I think that by using readOGR to import a shapefile renders worthless to put proj4string to the script since if any coords are available in the shapefile, it will be transported through the readOGR.   Therefore, proj4string is expedient only if we use another import function for example readShapeSpatial (for polygons, lines or points) or by using readOGR, but in the case that the shapefile does not contain the coordinates/projection:  When checking if the shapefile has projection information and if it has not, should I add proj4string although I have put readOGR? What EXACTLY cause Voldemort's soul piece to split off when he killed Lily and tried to kill Harry? how to use dom php parser How to maintain a file's 'last modified' date? Can I run a natural gas dryer from a portable propane tank? How to make a cycles light emisson object invisible to the camera? In my scene it is required to position the lights close to the main object like this:    How I can make the light source invisible to the camera? Could a ship warp into Borg cube and destroy it? During the Wolf-359 incident, 39 starships were destroyed, and 11,000 people were killed or assimilated.  Why didn’t one of the smaller ships warp into that one Borg cube? Doesn’t warping into it destroy anything?  Even if it just warps through without touching, one could program the navicom to self destruct while the ship is in the middle of Borg cube. (a) $S_k=\{A\subset\mathbb{N}: |A|=k\}$ for $k\in\mathbb{N}$  (b) $S = \bigcup_{k=1}^\infty S_k$   Work: For (a), I am not too sure about what approach I should use. I think finding a bijective function between the $S_k$ and $\mathbb{N}$ is hard to do . I also thought about using the Schroeder-Bernstein theorem and find injective functions $f:\mathbb{N}\rightarrow S_k$and $g:S_k\rightarrow\mathbb{N}$ in order to prove that $S_k$ and $\mathbb{N}$ are numerically equivalent. However, I have a hard time finding and proving these injective functions. I haven't really looked at (b) as I have yet to complete (a). The  doesn't give me much hope, but I'm hoping it's an undocumented (and/or GNU-specific) feature. Let us say I have added a PPA that has X package that I want but it also has Y package that I do not want to use or receive updates from. How can I, from the same PPA, receive updates for a specific package but deny updates from the same PPA for other packages.  A step by step example would be good since this has happened to me in several PPAs that have a particular package I want but also add a whole bunch of others that I do not yet want to update.