I can't get a villager to sell adventure mode items with names or 'CanPlaceOn' tags
How can I fix "unbalanced brackets" in my data tag?
Einstein's first postulate implies the second? Is it legal to run windows on a mac? I understand that it is Illegal to run OSx on a windows machine or PC for that matter, but is it illegal to do the reverse? Why or why not? How to connect Selenium to an existing browser that was opened manually in java or create semi automated tests? I want to achieve some use cases in which:  I want to perform some tasks that require manual intervention before kicking in automation execution. For instance, I need to manually launch the browser, navigate to the desired page, perform some manual tasks like entering captcha manually and then run the automation script to continue from there.  Debugging – Let's say we are working on a test script for a certain page (product checkout) in the application. But the script to reach that page (add to cart) is not ready yet. We can manually launch the browser and navigate to that page and then run the automation script.  Can someone help me to achieve this type of scenario? What is the fate of the Asgardians at the start of Avengers: Infinity War? Thor: Ragnarok ends with the remaining people of Asgard aboard a refugee ship that meets Thanos' ship. Avengers: Infinity War opens with      Thanos and his minions having commandeered the ship and several bodies can be seen on the floor.   This begs the question, what happened to these characters:   Korg Miek Asguardian extra #3 Valkyrie Combinatorics That Looks Similar to Vandermonde's Identity I thought the way to undo a \def was to define it to \relax, but that does not appear to work.  Also, am not sure why this produces no output if I try to use \def instead of \let in my attempt to do an undef.  \documentclass{article}  \begin{document}  \def\CaseA{}%  \ifdefined\CaseA%     \def\ProcessCaseA{}%     % Do stuff that uses \ProcessCaseA     %\def\ProcessCaseA\relax% no output if use this, and comment next line     \let\ProcessCaseA\relax% no output if comment this, and use above line \fi  % Now do stuff that requires \ProcessCaseA NOT be defined \ifdefined\ProcessCaseA     ERROR: \textbackslash ProcessCaseA is still defined \else     SUCCESS: \textbackslash ProcessCaseA is not defined \fi  \end{document} In which ways did scanning Nero's ship enhance/change Starfleet technology? I've heard the explanation that the Enterprise from 2009's Star Trek looked so much more advanced was because data gathered from the Kelvin initially scanning Nero's ship when it first appeared enabled them to upgrade their tech. I'm wondering if they've ever detailed exactly what technologies were advanced or enhanced or discovered. Prove that $\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\cdot \large\frac{\binom{n}{r}}{\binom{r+3}{r}} = \frac{3!}{2(n+3)}$ Prove that $\displaystyle \sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\cdot \large\frac{\binom{n}{r}}{\binom{r+3}{r}} = \frac{3!}{2(n+3)}$   $\bf{My\; Try::}$ We can write $$\frac{\binom{n}{r}}{\binom{r+3}{r}} = \frac{n!}{r!\times (n-r)!}\times \frac{r!\times 3!}{(r+3)!} = \frac{3!\times n!}{(n-r)!\times (r+3)!}$$  So our sum is $$ 3!\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\frac{n!}{(n-r)!\times (r+3)!} = \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\frac{(n+3)!}{(r+3)!\times (n-r)!}$$  So we get Sum $$ \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\binom{n+3}{r+3} = -\frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)}\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^{r+3}\binom{n+3}{r+3}$$  $$  = -\frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\left[-\binom{n+3}{3}+\binom{n+3}{4}-\binom{n+3}{5}--.......+(-1)^{n+3}\binom{n+3}{n+3}\right]$$  $$=-\frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\left[\binom{n+3}{0}-\binom{n+3}{1}+\binom{n+3}{2}-\binom{n+3}{3}+\binom{n+3}{4}-\binom{n+3}{5}--.......+(-1)^{n+3}\binom{n+3}{n+3}\right]+\frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\left[\binom{n+3}{0}-\binom{n+3}{1}+\binom{n+3}{2}\right]$$  So we get $$ = \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\left[1-(n+3)+\frac{(n+3)(n+2)}{2}\right] = \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)}\times \frac{n^2+3n+2}{2} = \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\times \frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2} = \frac{3!}{2(n+3)}$$  Can we prove it Using Combinatorial way,bcz above method is very lengthy  If yes then plz explain here  Thanks Windows Metro apps have wrong icon in search UI Invocable method Apex class is not visible in Process builder The difference between 'credit' and 'accredit'? Both verbs seem to mean the same thing -- to attribute 'X' to Mr. 'Y'. On looking it up, I found:  credit - publicly acknowledge a contributor's role in the production of (something published or broadcast).  accredit - give credit to (someone) for something.  Am I overthinking this, or is there really a difference I should know of? How can I get this symbol without using bbold? A solution I saw somewhere suggested to use   \usepackage{bbold} $\mathbb{1}$   which works well and I get what I want. However, now other symbols used to represent real numbers, natural numbers, etc look ugly.    I'd like them to look (without using bbold)    I'd like to only use that package to achieve that strange double one. Is there any way I can do that? How to show $n\sum_{i=1}^n {x_i^2} \ge (\sum_{i=1}^n{x_i})^2$ Characterization of short exact sequences The following is the first part of Proposition 2.9 in "Introduction to Commutative Algebra" by Atiyah &amp; Macdonald.     Let $A$ be a commutative ring with $1$. Let $$M' \overset{u}{\longrightarrow}M\overset{v}{\longrightarrow}M''\longrightarrow  0\tag{1} $$ be sequence of $A$-modules and homomorphisms. Then the sequence (1) is exact if and only if for all $A$-modules $N$, the   sequence  $$0\longrightarrow \operatorname{Hom}(M'', N)  \overset{\overline{v}}{\longrightarrow}\operatorname{Hom}(M,  N)\overset{\overline{u}}{\longrightarrow}\operatorname{Hom}(M', N)  \tag{2} $$ is exact.   Here, $\overline{v}$ is the map defined by $\overline{v}(f)=f\circ v$ for every $f\in\operatorname{Hom}(M'', N)$ and $\overline{u}$ is defined likewise.   The proof one of direction, namely $(2)\Rightarrow (1)$ is given in the book, which I am having some trouble understanding. So assuming (2) is exact sequence, the authors remark that "since $\overline{v}$ is injective for all $N$, it follows that $v$ is surjective". Could someone explain why this follows?  Given that $\overline{v}$ is injective, we know that whenever $f(v(x))=g(v(x))$ for all $x\in M$, we have $f=g$. I am not sure how we conclude from this surjectivity of $v$.  Thanks! i am finding nowhere a solution I am running UBUNTU 12.04 and using GNOME desktop, which I installed additionally. Logging into classic GNOME I see the following:     WHAT is this "earth globe" icon coming from?Seems to be named "starter". It is configured to open a website, from my bookmarks. WHY is it not showing the TIME?   Using dconf-editor I had no luck in answering the above questions.  Any idea? Show that $\frac{\sin x}{\cos 3x}+\frac{\sin 3x}{\cos 9x}+\frac{\sin 9x}{\cos 27x} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\tan 27x-\tan x\right)$ Small Caps and Bold Face I can't seem to have both the small caps and boldface styles on a line:  \huge\sc\bf Hello   This will generate bold text, and if the \sc is placed after, it will generate small caps text but not bolded. They seem to override each other, so is there any way to apply them both? Removing all fraction symbols like “¼” and “½” from a string Obtain the joint PDF of $\theta_{1} - \theta_{2}$ and $\theta_{1}$ where $\theta_{1}$ and $\theta_{2}$ are i.i.d $\text{Uniform}[0, 2\pi)$ I have 2 i.i.d Uniform random variables $\theta_{1}$ and $\theta_{2}$ on $[0, 2\pi)$. Here the problem pushes us to consider that all operations are made modulo $2\pi$. My question is how to obtain the joint PDF of $\theta_{1} - \theta_{2}$ and $\theta_{1}$ and then obtain the conditional PDF of $\theta_{1}$ given $\theta_{1} - \theta_{2}$??. For the second part It can be deduced from the first by writing it as the joint PDF divided by the PDF of $\theta_{1}$. But for the first part, A common idea that I saw is to derive the $\text{CDF}(x, y) = P(\theta_{1} - \theta_{2} \le x$, $\theta_{1} \le y$) and then perform derivations respect to $x$ and $y$. Is this a right approach? If yes, how to proceed with CDF especially with our uniform distribution restrictions? Are the leftovers from making stock good for anything? Having made stock and strained it, can the meat and vegetables boiled up in the stock be used for anything, or should they go in the bin?