Add custom dictionary for spell check to Android Studio
Add spanish spell check android studio
How do I alter a language item link? I am looking to modify the default output of Drupal 8 of links in a certain situation, the language switcher. Ideally I want to be able to do that in a twig template and not have to produce a  that overwwrites that whole link generation system and add a BIG if for the cases I need to overwrite.  I think the output layout should be controllable in the twig template similar to  (this answer outputs the same url for every languages)  I am using bootstrap as a base theme so i'd like to use the bootstrap markup for my links (btn btn-primary, dropdown)  Here is my code I am trying to make links--language-block.html.twig  {%- if links|length == 2 -%}     {# show only alternate language button #}     {%- for key, item in links -%}         {%- if not item.attributes['#options']['set_active_class'] -%} {# &lt;--- this is always true!? #}             &lt;a href="{{ item.link['#url'] }}" class="btn btn-primary"&gt;{{ item.link['#title'] }}&lt;/a&gt; {# #url is always the same what ever the language it is pointing to! #}         {%- endif -%}     {%- endfor -%} {%- elseif links|length &gt; 2  -%}     {# show selected language in button and other languages in drop down #}     &lt;button class="btn btn-primary dropdown-toggle" type="button" data-toggle="dropdown"&gt;{{ selectedLanguage }}&lt;span class="caret"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/button&gt;     &lt;ul class="dropdown-menu"&gt;         {% for key, item in links %}             {%- if not item.attributes['#options']['set_active_class'] -%} {# &lt;--- this is always true!? #}             &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="{{ item.link['#url'] }}"&gt;{{ item.link['#title'] }}&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;             {% endif %}         {% endfor %}     &lt;/ul&gt; {%- endif -%}   Anyone has an idea on how to do this? Born rule and unitary evolution Is the  a fundamental , or can it be inferred from unitary evolution? Make the search box return results from all StackOverflowian sites? Why is it called John Dies at the End? The 2012 adaptation of David Wong's "John Dies at the End" ends without John dying at the end at all. While the core of the film espouses the belief that time is not linear, the word "end" suggests there is a beginning and an end to things.  Why is the movie called John Dies at the End? Apparently I inadvertently irked a moderator by creating a tag.  The moderator told me that my tag was "meta" and therefore not appropriate.  Having been a SO user for a long time (and a lurker on MetaSO), it was not clear to me what makes my tag "meta" and why meta tags would be inappropriate.  Many of the questions I see on SO aren't really about the topics in the title or the existing tag list.  For example, , isn't really about C++ or SetWindowText (or the Windows API as tagged).  It's simply somebody who had a bug, couldn't find it, and tried to outsource the debugging.  This seems to be a common category of question on SO.  So I started tagged questions like this with the label "findmybug".  Lots of frequent SO contributors regularly answer questions in this category rather than voting to close them as "Too Localized".  I took that as a cue that I should also try to answer rather than voting to close.  But leaving these questions open and tagged with "c++" and "winapi" even though the question isn't really about C++ or the Windows API seemed misleading.  Someone searching for answers on using SetWindowText from C++ probably isn't making exactly the same mistake and won't find that entry useful.  (In the end, the sample question was closed as "Too Localized", but this doesn't seem common for these types of questions.)  The Tags page says:     A tag is a keyword or label that categorizes your question with other, similar questions. Using the right tags makes it easier for others to find and answer your question.   It seems to me that the "findmybug" tag does group these similar questions together.  So from that perspective, it seems to fit.  Lots of users seem to enjoy answering these types of questions, so it makes sense they'd want a way to find them.  If you want to suggest that all the questions I would tag as "findmybug" should be closed as "Too Localized", that's fine.  But I'm trying to ask the more general question:  What makes a tag meta, and are meta tags inappropriate? Google Analytics: How can I track between http:// and https:// profiles for a domain? Desktop shows a white or black background instead of wallpapers How To Use DateTimePicker In WPF? I have no idea how to use the DateTimePicker control in WPF. It is not available in the Toolbox. Expanding GCDs Reasoning: $\gcd(a,c) \cdot \gcd(b,c) = \gcd(ab,bc,ac,cc)$ I'm just wondering the reason behind being able to do this:  $$\gcd(a,c) \cdot \gcd(b,c) = \gcd(ab,bc,ac,cc)$$  Is there an elementary proof to the reasoning behind this? Between you and ("me" or "I")? Is it correct to say "between you and me" or "between you and I"?  I am not a native English speaker, so please bear with me. For example, if I have a lens that is 16mm-50mm, which focal length would be the closest to the human eye's view? (I don't have a camera yet, so I'm just curious.)   Would 50mm be more zoomed in than "normal"?  I imagine 16mm would be wider than the normal human point of view? How do I restrict scaling to a specific axis? Im new to Blender but have some experience with 3dsmax. In blender, when i select some polys and try to scale them, i have no control on the amount and especially relative axis on which the scale would happen, where as with 3ds max i could scale restricted to x, y, z or any combination of using the handy widget. Is there a way to replicate this, or to get any control over the scale ?  thanks, Cardinality of equivalence relations in $\mathbb{N}$ I came across this long proof on this site:    But I would like to know whether my direction can work.  Say we want to find the cardinality of all equivalence relations in $\mathbb{N}$. Since it is a subset of all relations in $\mathbb{N}$, I conclude it has a cardinality smaller or equal to $\aleph$. Now, define an injective function from $P(\mathbb{N})$ to the set of equivalence relations by matching each subset of $\mathbb{N}$ with the identity relation (which is an equivalence relation in $\mathbb{N}$.  Therefore the cardinality of all equivalence relations in $\mathbb{N}$ is greater or equal to $\aleph$ and using CSB we get the desired result.  Seems legit? How to compute $\lim _{x\to 0}\frac{x\bigl(\sqrt{3e^x+e^{3x^2}}-2\bigr)}{4-(\cos x+1)^2}$? I have a problem with this limit, I don't know what method to use. I have no idea how to compute it. Is it possible to compute this limit with the McLaurin expansion? Can you explain the method and the steps used? Thanks. (I prefer to avoid to use L'Hospital's rule.)  $$\lim _{x\to 0}\frac{x\bigl(\sqrt{3e^x+e^{3x^2}}-2\bigr)}{4-(\cos x+1)^2}$$ How to merge columns in a table? I have this table, but wanted to format the first row. I like to match the two columns of first row, and last two columns of the same first row. Any suggestion on how to do that?  \begin{table}[!h]  \caption{Comparison of percentages.} \begin{tabular}{lclclclclc} \hline \hline  Mode &amp;  Var  &amp;  Cum\\ \hline {}       &amp; EF   &amp; CHF    &amp; EF2   &amp; CHF2\\ 1   &amp;  17.5 &amp; 19.1   &amp; 17.5  &amp; 19.1\\ 2   &amp;  11.8 &amp; 12.7   &amp; 29.3  &amp;  31.9\\ 3   &amp;  6.6  &amp;  5.6         &amp; 35.9    &amp;  37.4\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table} I am trying to solve this integral $$ \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{1}{2007^x+1}\cdot \frac{\sin^{2008}x}{\sin^{2008}x+\cos^{2008}x}dx $$ A closed form does exist despite the looks of the integrand.  This problem is from some old high school IMO training courses.  I am not sure how to solve it. The only information that may be of help is $$ \sin x=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}, \quad \cos x=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{ x^{2n}}{(2n)!} \quad \forall \ x $$ Thanks, I am looking for a complete solution, not a description as of what to do. New Beamer Version: Transparent Title Page Boxes If $R$ is an infinite ring, then $R$ has either infinitely many zero divisors, or no zero divisors Please help me to prove that if $R$ is an infinite ring, then $R$ has either an infinite number of zero divisors, or it has no zero divisors. I stumbled upon a  with the following paragraph:     MBIE has launched an investigation into claims Chinese galvanised   steel coil imports have been dumped on the local market, causing   "material injury" to New Zealand industry, and the case will end up on   the table of newly appointed Commerce Minister Jacqui Dean.   I thought that sentence was grammatically wrong because the author should put the word "that" (as a conjunction) right after the word "claim". I don't see why the author could drop the conjunction. Is this a prevailing phenomenon in American or Australian English? Why directory with large amounts of entries does not shrink in size after entries are removed? Close vote notice: While the linked duplicate asks same question, the comments and the only answer do not provide an answer which draws from authoritative source. The , does in fact provide the answer I've been seeking. Thus the proposed duplicate isn't helpful, however Thomas's answer here is proper.  According to the  and personal account , directories that have large amount of entries get to a size over 4096 bytes (which can be seen with ls -l output), but once the entries are removed - the number never goes down.   The question is "why" ? Is it due to how ext4 filesystem configured to retain directory metadata ? Obviously removing the directory and recreating it isn't a solution, since it deletes original inode and creates a new one. What can be done to decrease the number manually ?