do creatures created after a "all creatures get -1/-1 until end of turn" instant get -1/-1 as well?
Does a card that affects 'each' creature affect creatures that enter the battlefield after it resolves?
What is the meaning of the beta-coefficient for an interaction term in a crossover study? I have asked a similar question here:  I am puzzled by the interpretation for an interaction term. In my data my Y is an interval variable with the health outcome of an experiment. I have used an interaction term in which I have interacted the condition with the predisposition of the subject considering health status at base level. They are both categorical variables (factor variables in R).  Now it gets complicated because the Condition was two treatments: in treatment A subjects got the placebo first and then the real medicine whereas in treatment B they go the real medicine first and the placebo second. All it changes is the order.   Health outcome = a + Condition * Health.Base   I have the worst state of health at the base level as my reference category I find that interaction with the Condition is statistically significant but I am not sure how to interpret this.  I use the lm() function of R (although my design looks more like an ANOVA) and in the output I get the b coefficient in an output that looks like this:  ConditionB:Health.Base.So.and.So         (Beta and p-value) ConditionB:Health.Base.Excellent         (Beta and p-value)   A statistically significant interaction term for those in Excellent health at baseline would mean that they are affected by the Condition B more than Condition A compared to the reference category people (Poor health at baseline). Is this right? What does the beta-coefficient represent?   If I would like to examine for each Health category at the base line separately without comparing to a reference category I would have to code each category as a dummy variable. However, in this case I would compare whether membership to a specific health status at the base line significantly changes between conditions compared to those who belong to the other health statuses at the base line. Is this right? Again, what does the beta-coefficient represent?  Would it be right to assume that the choice of the interaction between the Condition and the dummy variables is easier to interpret?  --- EDIT --- R output:  Call: lm(formula = HealthOutcome ~ Condition * HealthStatus,      data = datA)  Residuals:     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max  -1.5957 -0.5942 -0.2640  0.4423  2.4423   Coefficients:                                        Estimate Std. Error t value     Pr(&gt;|t|)     (Intercept)                            2.595652   0.053044  48.934  &lt; 2e-16 *** ConditionCondB                        -0.001449   0.077071  -0.019    0.985     HealthStatusSo.and.So                 -0.331693   0.078094  -4.247  2.35e-05 *** HealthStatusExcellent                 -0.836724   0.092692  -9.027  &lt; 2e-16 *** ConditionCondB:HealthStatusSo.and.So   0.137490   0.110612   1.243    0.214     ConditionCondB:HealthStatusExcellent  -0.199787   0.133943  -1.492    0.136     --- Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1  Residual standard error: 0.8045 on 1059 degrees of freedom   (68 observations deleted due to missingness) Multiple R-squared:   0.16, Adjusted R-squared:  0.156  F-statistic: 40.33 on 5 and 1059 DF,  p-value: &lt; 2.2e-16 Get polynomial interpolation formula Is there a rule in British English about how to pronounce "either"? Complex towers: $i^{i^{i^{...}}}$ If $w = z^{z^{z^{...}}}$ converges, we can determine its value by solving $w = z^{w}$, which leads to $w = -W(-\log z))/\log z$.  To be specific here, let's use $u^v = \exp(v \log u)$ for complex $u$ and $v$.  Two questions:   How do we determine analytically if the tower converges?  (I have seen the interval of convergence for real towers.) Both the logarithm and Lambert W functions are multivalued.  How do we know which branch to use?   In particular $i^{i^{i^{...}}}$ numerically seems to converge to one value of $i2W(-i\pi/2)/\pi$.  How do we establish this convergence analytically?  (Yes, I have searched the 'net, including the tetration forum.  I haven't been able to locate the answer to this readily.) Given:  DateTime.UtcNow   How do I get a string which represents the same value in an -compliant format?  Note that ISO 8601 defines a number of similar formats. The specific format I am looking for is:  yyyy-MM-ddTHH:mm:ssZ I have a NetGear WGR614 wireless router.  There is a 'region' setting in the wireless options.  I'm wondering what technical purpose of this setting is?  The admin help states:     It may not be legal to operate the router in a region other than the region shown here.    Which makes me wonder if it could be adjusting it's max power output based on regional radio laws? What is reflection, and why is it useful?  I'm particularly interested in Java, but I assume the principles are the same in any language. I understand there has been so much on this topic but I am still confused. I get that if the person is the subject it is who and anything else is whom. However, I'm really struggling to work out this rule for the following sentence:     The scope of which his account of morality applies to is therefore restricted to those whom/who the ‘notion of justification to a being of that kind makes sense.’   Should it be who or whom? I can't work out the subject and object. Generics and inheritance: need a complex Map instance Natural Sort Order in C# Book about a boy who travels to a parallel universe to get a book Adding Favorites to the Stack Exchange global inbox We're considering adding favorite notifications to the global inbox, and are looking for feedback on the idea (as we're not completely sold on it).  But first, some history.  Favorites are kind of like bookmarks, in that they're kept in a handy centralized place.  They also follow you across browsers.  Ok, ok... "bookmarks, on the internet" is not the most compelling feature, but Favorites also opted you into notices for those questions as if you were the owner (edits and new answers, at least).  This was probably the most confusing part (though a  feature) of the old envelope behavior judging by erroneous bug reports, so a way to opt out of this .  Now, favorite updates go nowhere.  But we could* put them into the inbox.  Here's how we envision this feature working:   Every current user has their "notify me on favorite changes" preference cleared (new users start with it cleared). The first time someone favorites a question, they're prompted to opt-in to favorite notices. Whenever a question is commented on or answered (or, possibly, edited) a new notice is pushed into the inbox of users who have favorited it, and have opted in.   Opt-in would be per-site, and it would remain possible to opt-out from your profile page.   This is not a final design, but the basic idea is correct  As I mentioned above, we're not 100% sold on this idea.  We've had a policy to date that nothing goes into the inbox that isn't specifically targeted at a user; this would be tweaking that policy.  *We could also put changes into their tab on the user page, but that reduces their visibility. I regularly find sites that copy content from elsewhere (mailing lists, etc) while not providing any added value. Quite to the contrary, they are pretty heaped with ads.  I'd like to remove those sites as permanently as possible from my Google search results. Any ideas? I'm kind of curious what kinds of criteria other people go through when selecting the correct answer to their questions.  Here's what I consider when selecting the answer to my question:   Is the answer objective?  It's easy to pick out biased answers.  Usually they involve a statement along the lines of "x sucks, you should ALWAYS use y." Do other members seem to support the answer?  Has it gotten a significant number of +1 posts or has it been voted up a number of times? Is the answer the most thorough?  Does it have an example?   With that said, there are a couple of BAD reasons to choose an answer in my opinion:   The answer is what you want to hear.  My biggest pet peeve is when somebody asks what ostensibly appears to be a valid question, but is really just a thinly veiled attempt to get someone to agree with them.  Thus, the question usually ends up showing a certain bias.  And guess which answer gets selected?  The one that confirms that bias. Nobody posted a better answer.  If you don't see a good enough answer, don't select one.   I'm sure there are a few things I'm leaving out, plus some of what I've said may be arguable.  What is everyone else's take on this? I was going through fluid dynamics and I came upon this section on the shape of a liquid surface in a rotating cylindrical vessel. The working in the book is something like this:   It considers a mass $m$ of water on the surface of the rotating liquid at a distance $x$ from its axis of rotation .It takes into account a pseudo force ($m \cdot x \cdot \omega^2$) radially outwards and its weight force ($mg$).It then proceeds to calculate the net force and the angle it makes with the vertical.From there through basic integration it gets the equation of the surface of liquid  i.e. $y= \dfrac{(x^2 \cdot \omega^2)}{2g}$ .  I get this working.  But if I were to view the same rotation through an inertial frame,how would I proceed? I mean, there wouldn't be any pseudo force, rather a centripetal acceleration of same magnitude radially inwards.This is where I am facing certain doubts.  The forces on the liquid would be  the centripetal force inwards and the weight force downwards.The net force would therefore be in a different direction,and consequently the slope of the surface at that point would be in a different direction.How is it possible for the same surface to have two different shapes in two different frames?   I would be obliged if someone could help me out by pointing out the flaw in my understanding. I bought a used iPhone 4.  The previous owner re-set the phone, but did not remove the device from their iCloud.  It is asking me for their iCloud information when I try to set-up the phone.  I don't have contact with the previous owner anymore.  Is there a way to remove the device from their iCloud so I can use a new one? Limit $\lim\limits_{x\to0}{\frac{\ln{(e+x)}-e^x}{\cos^2{x} -e^x}}$ Add 1Password extensions support to the SE iOS app Please implement the URL scheme to call 1Password for password lookups on the iOS app.   a URL scheme for switching to 1Password to search item titles for a custom term, usually a service name like “twitter” or “evernote”. This speeds up the process for the user so they can copy something like their password and get back to your app  That will ease sign up speed using long, complicated or unmemorable passwords for many users of both apps. In the two years since the above blog was published there are now updated instructions for implementation and code on github: I am often logged in several SSH sessions at once. To logout from several sessions, I press CTRL+d, until I am back on my local machine. However, I occasionally press it once too many, and my terminal exits. Is there a way to make CTRL+d unable to close my terminal ? I am using terminator as my terminal emulator. There are many documentaries, forums, blogs and more dedicated to . I have been frantically searching for an answer to my question however none of my sources have clarity to the matter of hand. I would really love a clear explanation to: What exactly is Dark Matter? Please help me to have a clear understanding.