The TOS and footer refer to different CC BY-SA license versions
What licence is subscriber content provided under 4.0, 3.0 or them all?
This question was recently split into different questions for each workaround. See   meta posts for more information.   Can you use NBT tags in commands? I’ve tried commands that normally work in Java Edition like: give @s minecraft:planks 30 1 {display:{Lore:[&quot;Wooden planks&quot;]}} give @s stone_pickaxe{Unbreakable:1b} give @s item_frame{EntityTag:{Invisible:1b}} summon villager ~ ~ ~ {Offers:{Recipes:[{buy:{id:&quot;emerald&quot;,Count:5b},sell:{id:&quot;diamond_sword&quot;}}]}} summon tnt ~ ~ ~ {Fuse:20s} Is it possible to view the scene in the viewport camera view at 1:1? Headers of \chapters* take the headers of their previous \chapter When using book.cls and using \chapter* after a \chapter, the header used in \chapter* is wrong. An example is pasted below.   Is there any known workaround for that? I have tried quite some tricks without success.   \documentclass[]{book}  \begin{document}  \chapter{First Chapter} aslkjdf  \chapter*{Unnumbered Chapter} The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.  The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.  When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.  To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.  For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.  Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.  For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.  Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.  Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.  The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.  \end{document} Class not found loading JDBC org.postgresql.Driver Difference between “with”, “at” and “for” with a business title and a company name The prepositions “with”, “at” and “for” are also used to associate a business title with a company's name. It seems that they are interchangeable, with no (significant) difference in meaning. The following examples taken from The New York Times website seem to confirm that:      Until now, said Justin Nielson, a senior analyst for the media   research firm SNL Kagan, “there really hasn't been any direct   competitor . . .      “The consumer is still deleveraging,” said Jason Goldberg, a senior   analyst with Barclays. “It's not a lack of supply; it's a lack of   demand.”      “There’s the party of fear and the party of despair,” Nikos Xydakis, a   political analyst and an editor at Kathimerini daily, said.   Are they really the same as for meaning? If it isn't so, what is the difference between them? I would like to manipulate the HTML inside an iframe using jQuery.  I thought I'd be able to do this by setting the context of the jQuery function to be the document of the iframe, something like:  $(function(){ //document ready     $('some selector', frames['nameOfMyIframe'].document).doStuff() });   However this doesn't seem to work. A bit of inspection shows me that the variables in frames['nameOfMyIframe'] are undefined unless I wait a while for the iframe to load. However, when the iframe loads the variables are not accessible (I get permission denied-type errors).  Does anyone know of a work-around to this? The Pauli group for $n$-qubits is defined as $G_n=\{I,X,Y,Z \}^{\otimes n}$, that is as the group containing all the possible tensor products between $n$ Pauli matrices. It is clear that the Pauli matrices form a basis for the $2\times 2$ complex matrix vector spaces, that is $\mathbb{C}^{2\times 2}$. Apart from it, from the definition of the tensor product, it is known that the $n$-qubit Pauli group will form a basis for the tensor product space $(\mathbb{C}^{2\times 2})^{\otimes n}$.  I am wondering if the Pauli group in $n$-qubits forms a basis for the complex vector space where the elements of this tensor product space act, that is $\mathbb{C}^{2^n\times 2^n}$. Summarizing, the question would be, is $(\mathbb{C}^{2\times 2})^{\otimes n}=\mathbb{C}^{2^n\times 2^n}$ true?  I have been trying to prove it using arguments about the dimensions of both spaces, but I have not been able to get anything yet. Let $A$ be a diagonalizable matrix and $\lambda$ be an eigenvalue of A. Prove that rank($\lambda I - A$) = rank(($\lambda I - A)^2$). The infinite product of the sines of all positive integers is zero I tried to prove that $\prod\limits_{k = 1}^\infty  {\sin k = 0}$  Define $$P(m)=\prod\limits_{k = 1}^m  {\left|\sin k\right|}$$  then I take the logarithm of both sides $$\log P(m)=\log \prod\limits_{k = 1}^m  {\left|\sin k\right|}$$  which can be written as $$a_m=\log P(m)=\sum\limits_{k = 1}^m  {\log\,\left|\sin k\right|}$$ for any $k\in\mathbb{N}$ we have $0&lt;\left|\sin k\right|&lt;1$, so all terms of the sum above is strictly negative.  I say that the sequence diverges: $\left\{a_m\right\}_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\to\,-\infty$  This is a delicate point on which I have some doubts.  I know that  $$\int\limits_0^\pi  {\log \left|\sin x\right|{\text{ d}}x}  =  - \pi \log 2$$ and that the function $\log \left|\sin x\right|$ is periodic with period $\pi$,  so the integral from 1 to $\infty$ diverges to $- \infty$. Then the series diverges as well for the integral test for convergence.  As $\log P(m)\to\, -\infty$ we can say that $P(m)\to\,0$ as $m\to\,\infty$  Therefore $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{m \to \infty } \prod\limits_{k = 1}^m {\left| {\sin k} \right| = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{m \to \infty } \prod\limits_{k = 1}^m {\sin k = \prod\limits_{k = 1}^\infty  {\sin k = } 0} }.\quad \blacksquare$$ Call to getLayoutInflater() in places not in activity When should a verb be followed by a gerund instead of an infinitive? Some verbs are followed by ing, e.g. I enjoy swimming. We can't say I enjoy to swim. Likewise, some verbs are followed by to, e.g. I decided to make a plan.   Which particular verbs are followed by ing and to? Can you please provide a list for that?  Moreover, which verbs can be followed by both without having the meaning changed? Having the derivative be an operator Different methods to compute $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k^2}$ (Basel problem) As I have heard people did not trust Euler when he first discovered the formula (solution of the ) $$\zeta(2)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{6}.$$ However, Euler was Euler and he gave other proofs.   I believe many of you know some nice proofs of this, can you please share it with us? Etymology of "dong" and "dongle" Dong as in ding-dong is clearly onomatopoetic as confirmed by :     ding dong        imitative of the sound of a bell, c.1560.   and similarly for :     ding (v.)       1819, "to sound as metal when struck," possibly abstracted from ding-dong, of imitative origin. The meaning "to deal heavy blows" is c.1300, probably from Old Norse dengja "to hammer," perhaps also imitative. Meaning "dent" is 1960s. Related: Dinged; dinging.   What, then, is the origin of dong to mean penis? Etymonline.com is  here:     dong (n.)        "penis," 1891, of unknown origin.   We also have a much more recent word, dongle, which has no entry at etymonline.com but  claims it is:     Apparently from dangle.   This leads me to the theory that the anatomical and onomatopoetic dongs  are not related and that the former usage, like dongle, derives from dangle. So, my questions are:   Is that so? Does dong (penis) derive from dangle? Sounds reasonable enough but I have found no definitive sources for it. Does dongle derive from dangle? It makes perfect descriptive sense for dong but the USB devices called dongles do not dangle but instead protrude quite rigidly, so I feel that dongle being derived from the cruder meaning of dong makes more sense. How can I run an external program from C and parse its output? I've got a utility that outputs a list of files required by a game.  How can I run that utility within a C program and grab its output so I can act on it within the same program? UPDATE: Good call on the lack of information.  The utility spits out a series of strings, and this is supposed to be portable across Mac/Windows/Linux.  Please note, I'm looking for a programmatic way to execute the utility and retain its output (which goes to stdout). Supremum and Infimum Let $A$ be a nonempty set of real numbers which is bounded below. Let $-A$ be the set of all numbers $-x$, where $x \in A$. Prove that $\inf A = -\sup(-A)$.   We know that $-A$ is bounded above. Hence $\sup(-A)$ exists. So to proceed, one would show that $\inf A \leq -\sup(-A)$ and $\inf A \geq -\sup(-A)$? Or $-\inf A &gt; \sup(-A)$ and $-\inf A &lt; \sup(-A)$.  I get the sense that one can use the following fact as well: (i) Let $\alpha = \sup S$. If $\beta &lt; \alpha$ then $\beta$ is not an upper bound for $S$. What are some good books for learning the concepts of Kinematics, Newton laws, 2D Motion of Object etc.? What are the tools to help import my data into Salesforce I am switching from old CRM and looking for easy to use tools to import my data With java.sql.ResultSet is there a way to get a column's name as a String by using the column's index? I had a look through the API doc but I can't find anything. I am trying to create the following trigger:      CREATE TRIGGER update_customers AFTER INSERT ON wp_usermeta     FOR EACH ROW      BEGIN             if new.wp_metakey = first_name then insert into test_customer(first_name) values (new.wp_meta_value);     END   I keep getting a 1064 error that says, "You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresopons to your MySQL server version for the right syntaxt to use near " at line 5"  What am I doing wrong?