Stop updating old kernel
Same update keeps showing up everyday
What is the meaning of 'though'? Okay, of course I've used different popular online dictionaries and the translation makes sense in the most cases.    Sometimes I find usages of 'though' where I don't get the meaning of the word.   An example I've found on twitter     That face, though. [Image of a dog looking weird]   The tweet came without any context or conversation.  When I translate this example to my native language - german - this makes absolutely no sense. At least for me.  So is the above usage some kind of slang? What is the meaning of though in this case?  For the completeness an example that makes absolutely sense for me     Though he tried very hard, he failed the course. How do you find the value of $\sum_{r=0}^{44} \tan^2(2r+1)$? Problem:   Find the value of $$\sum_{r=0}^{44} \tan^2(2r+1)$$  Note: The angles here are in degrees.    I don't know how to solve this question because trigonometric simplifications didn't get me anywhere. I think there was a method to solve this question using complex numbers which I no longer remember. Any hint/help will be appreciated. How to order the Ubuntu Phone? Yes, of course, I want that Ubuntu Phone.   Where is the order now button? How does conservation work in wormholes? My questions might seem naive as I haven't plunged into the mathematical descriptions, but wormholes are interesting even if I don't actually know them :)  First of all, is wormhole making two possible paths betwwen points (like the tunnel in most visualisations) or is it just making two points beside each other like in the game Portal? Of course, second case can be bent into a tunnel, but there would be nothing special about tunnel part and no preferred way to divide into "normal" and "tunnel" part of spacetime.  My main questions are these:   Is momentum conserved? Is kinetic energy conserved? How does potential energy work?   To elaborate... In the game Portal you can fall into floor and fly out of the wall or floor elsewhere with the same speed, but another direction (normal to the portal). So momentum is not conserved, but kinetic energy is. Is that how it would actually work? Where does the momentum go then?  And does it really allow you to increase your potential energy while retaining kinetic? It would seem fair to take away some kinetic energy if you are put in a region where you have more potential energy.  Either way is the change in energy non-continuous like in the game and discussion that's linked below? Or are there just more than one way to move through but the change in potential energy is smooth in any of those? That would mean more potential equilibrium points though...  Similar questions has been discussed , is it correct about how the falling guys gets a lot of energy (in form of a potential one) by draining it from the mouths? What is the most efficient way to convert a MySQL query to CSV in PHP please?  It would be best to avoid temp files as this reduces portability (dir paths and setting file-system permissions required).  The CSV should also include one top line of field names. There is an alignment issue in the stackexchange.com search page .  The bottom bar is missing in the search input box.  Sample URL:   Screen shot for reference:    Firefox version: 54.0b8 (32-bit) OS Version: Windows 10 Pro  Also happens with Chrome latest version. Digging in deeper to Javascript Remoting and I'm a bit confused.  The  starts off by showing how to set up everything and uses code like the following:  function getRemoteAccount() {     var accountName = document.getElementById('acctSearch').value;      // This remoting call will use the page's timeout value     Visualforce.remoting.Manager.invokeAction(         '{!$RemoteAction.AccountRemoter.getAccount}',         accountName,          handleResult     ); }   However, I've also seen examples where Visualforce.remoting.Manager.invokeAction is never called.  They end up looking something like the following:  function getText() {   var text = "";   JSRemotingBasicsController.doGetText(     function(result, event) {       // do something here     }   ); }   I'm wondering what is the point to using Visualforce.remoting.Manager.invokeAction when you can just reference the RemoteAction directly like the second example?  Is there something I'm missing?  Is there a time where the second example doesn't work? Count occurrences of each element in a List[List[T]] in Scala is a one-by-one-matrix just a number (scalar)? I was wondering. Clearly, we cannot multiply a (1x1)-matrix with a (4x3)-matrix; However, we can multiply a scalar with a matrix. This suggests a difference.  On the other hand, I was, for example, in an econometrics lecture today, where we had for a (Tx1)-vector $\underline{û}=\left( \begin{array}{c} û_1\\ \vdots\\ û_T\end{array}\right)$:     $S_{ûû}:= \sum_{i=1}^T û_i^2$ shall be minimized. We see see that   $S_{ûû}=\underline{û}^T\underline{û}$.   Well, formally, shouldn't it be $(S_{ûû})=\underline{û}^T\underline{û}$ or $S_{ûû}=\det(\underline{û}^T\underline{û})$, to ensure that we stay in the space of matrices and not suddenly go to the space of scalars? So here, the professor (physicist) not only treats $\underline{û}^T\underline{û}$ like a scalar, but also calls it a scalar. Is this formally legit or a wrong simplification (though it does not seem to have any impact, and surely makes life easier)? Short story; war where speed of time changes with distance from front line How to fix error W: Target Packages (main/binary-amd64/Packages) is configured multiple times in my sources.list file? setting up apache2 webserver -- differences between behaviour within my intranet and outside Possible Duplicate:          I have seen  in SQL. I wonder how would you approach the opposite problem: splitting coma delimited string into rows of data:  Lets say I have tables:  userTypedTags(userID,commaSeparatedTags) 'one entry per user tags(tagID,name)   And want to insert data into table  userTag(userID,tagID) 'multiple entries per user   Inspired by  question  EDIT  Thanks for the answers, actually more then one deserves to be accepted but I can only pick one, and the  with recursions seems pretty clean to me. It works on SQL Server 2005 and above.   For earlier version of SQL Server the solution  can be used.  For working with text data type  will be helpful. Thanks again. Parallel execution of bash script I have a table URL_Experiment in my database (mySQL database). I have 2 million URL links in this table.  For each URL, I am checking if some particular text is present in the URL and updating the information back in my URL_Experiment table.    Now, I need to make the script run fast. The easy solution that comes to my mind is:  split the URL_Experiment into 10 tables (each with 200,000 rows) and run the script 10 times simultaneously. This way, I can ensure that the updates happen properly. But for this, I need to save 10 scripts, each accessing the correct table (I need to rename the tables from 1 to 10).   Though the above seems a pretty neat solution, I am looking for a more sophisticated solution. Something which will execute the same script simultaneously (in parallel) as 10 processes. My concern is the execution time. I do not want the resources to be wasted when they can be utilized. Scoring when two triple word squares are covered in one play The word QUAGMIRE is on the board vertically, with the Q on the top row, second column. The next player creates SQUEEZED horizontally, landing the S on the triple word square in the top row, first column, and remaining UEEZED landing to the right of the existing Q, ending with the D on the triple word square in the eighth column. Since two triple word squares are covered in this one placement, how would it be scored?  Letters:   S: 1 Q: 10 U: 1 E: 1 x 2 (double letter) E: 1 Z: 10 E: 1 D: 1   27 Total for letters. Do you then multiply by 3 for the first triple word square, and then multiply that result by 3?  27 X 3 = 81, 81 X 3 = 243  Bonus for all 7 tiles placed:  243 + 50 = 293 Formula Specific to Running User? I have a requirement where a certain field can be edited without the validations firing for a particular user. Now I tried to write rule like LastModifiedId != '005000000000000AAA' but the validation was still firing. Then I realized that until the record saves, the LastModifiedId does not change and the validations still fire, as the LastModifiedId would not be updated to the exempted User.   Is there any workaround or a way to check the Id of the User who is currently editing the record? The Python docs say:     re.MULTILINE: When specified, the pattern character '^' matches at the beginning of the string and at the beginning of each line (immediately following each newline)... By default, '^' matches only at the beginning of the string...   So what's going on when I get the following unexpected result?  &gt;&gt;&gt; import re &gt;&gt;&gt; s = """// The quick brown fox. ... // Jumped over the lazy dog.""" &gt;&gt;&gt; re.sub('^//', '', s, re.MULTILINE) ' The quick brown fox.\n// Jumped over the lazy dog.' To consume REST services there is a lot of boilerplate code needed:   Build Apex Objects to model the responses Code to deserialize REST responses to those classes Handling of HTTP requests, responses and errors ...   Did anyone come up with patterns or best practices codified into an open source library or framework that one could just reuse in a similar project without reinventing the callout-wheel over an over again?  Like the zillions of trigger-frameworks that exist as repos on Github... was closed as "Not constructive" a little while ago by CasperOne. I'm not here to argue about the closure; in fact, I'm forced to agree that, as it stands, the question is explicitly a polling question and eligible to be closed for that reason.  I'd like to see it preserved, however; it's got a fair bit of useful in-depth information for ObjC/Cocoa developers on the "singleton" topic.* It's also (possibly more importantly) a great duplicate target -- have a look at the list of linked questions. I want to try to stave off deletion, and hopefully get it reopened.** (I did vote for reopening, but it expired.)  My thought is to edit the question itself into a "constructive" form, but after spending some time pondering how to do so, I'm not crazy about any of the ideas that I've come up with. Essentially they all involve reworking the question to fit the answers:   Rewrite the question so that the accepted answer fits exactly. "I've got this singleton implementation, but I really want the creation to happen earlier in my app's execution. How can I make that happen?" This is artificial and (in my opinion) doesn't make a particularly good question. Make the question still general, but more concrete and focused on the implementation give in the body. "What are the pitfalls associated with this singleton creation procedure? Are there other features that my singleton should have?" This is still skirting the border of discussion->NC, and none of the answers really respond to this exactly. Remove the implementation from the question and just ask for the "best" implementation. This obviously requires coming up with stringent criteria for "best", and, while it would preserve the relationship between the Q and A's best, might not even move it out of NC territory.   I'm looking for suggestions of ways to re-write this so that it can stick around. Alternatively, if you think I should just be advocating for a historical lock, say so.   If you think my basic premise is faulty and don't think the question should be preserved at all, I respectfully request that you just downvote me instead of answering -- I'd prefer not to turn this into an argument about the merits of the question, and I definitely don't want it to become a(nother) "deletionist"/"inclusionist" skirmish (and I am not infrequently ).    *Quite a bit of it unfortunately in comments.  **Historical locking would also be an acceptable solution to me, but it doesn't seem to fit the "controversial" criterion. CSS Selector that applies to elements with two classes