VS2010 form size and screen resolution issue
Is the size of a Form in Visual Studio designer limited to screen resolution?
Helvetica font has jagged edges I use 'Helvetica' as my font and build my document using Texmaker. But the PDF generated has jagged edges while using this font and when I use a different font (say Times or even Helvetica sans-serif) it builds just fine.     Please suggest if there is anyway I can get over this. The problem with these jagged edges is that it appears very dull and unreadable at 100% resolution.  OK guys, now here is the MWE  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %% HEADER %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \documentclass[a4paper,twoside,12pt]{book}  %% Language %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} %\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{graphicx,color,subfigure}  %% Line Spacing %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \usepackage{setspace} %\singlespacing        %% 1-spacing (default) %\onehalfspacing       %% 1,5-spacing \doublespacing        %% 2-spacing  %% Other Packages %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=1in, bottom=1in, includefoot, headheight=13.6pt]{geometry} \usepackage[pagebackref=true,breaklinks=true,letterpaper=true,colorlinks,bookmarks=false]{hyperref} \usepackage{helvet} \usepackage[square,numbers]{natbib} \usepackage{hyphenat} \usepackage{fancyhdr}   \begin{document}  \pagestyle{empty} %No headings for the first pages.  \cleardoublepage %The first chapter should start on an odd page.  \pagestyle{plain} %Now display headings: headings / fancy / ...  \pagebreak  %------------------------------------------------------------------------ \chapter{Divorce}   A major change that has occurred in the Western family is an increased incidence in divorce. Whereas in the past, divorce was a relatively rare occurrence, in recent times it has become quite commonplace. This change is borne out clearly in census figures. For example thirty years ago in Australia, only one marriage in ten ended in divorce; nowadays the figure is more than one in three (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996: p.45). A consequence of this change has been a substantial increase in the number of single parent families and the attendant problems that this brings (Kilmartin, 1997).   \end{document} Variation of the Kempner series – convergence of series $\sum\frac{1}{n}$ where $9$ is not a digit of $1/n$. It is easy to argue that the  converges:  $$  \sum\limits_{\substack{n \text{ s.t. 9 is}\\\text{ not a digit} \\\text{ of } n}}  \frac{1}{n} &lt; \infty$$  Let $E \subset \Bbb N_{&gt;0}$  the subset of the positive integers  such that $9$ is not a digit of the decimal expansion of $1/n$ (the decimal expansion is not allowed to have a trailing infinite sequence of "$9$"s. For instance $0.24999...$ is not allowed).  Here are the  that don't belong to $E$ : $11,13,17,19,21,23,29,31,34,38,41,…$ (not known by the OEIS, by the way).  My question is:     Does the series    $$ \sum\limits_{n \in E} \frac{1}{n} \tag 1$$ converge?   My attempt is :   Let $1/n = 0,a_1 a_2 \dots a_k \overline{b_1 b_2 \dots b_m}$ with $n \in E$. Since $1/n$ has no digit "9", we have at most $9^{k+m}$ possibilities for the $a_i$'s and $b_j$'s. Moreover, $1/n ≥ 0,00...0\overline{00...01}≥1/10^{k+m}$. But then I can only bound my series $(1)$ from below, by some real number. So, this is not a clue for the divergence of the series. Apparently, the numbers of the form $n=10k+1$ don't belong to $E$. Maybe we can find sufficiently many numbers that have $9$ in the decimal representation of their reciprocals, so that $(1)$ could converge...   Any comment will be appreciated ! made me think about the movie versions of the 7th book.  In Deathly Hallows Part II      Voldemort has Nagini attack Snape because Voldy thinks that Snape has the Elder Wand's allegiance. We know that Snape didn't actually have the allegiance, Draco did (and by then Harry did) and his plan had failed.   But if Voldy's plan had succeeded with Snape, would he have gotten allegiance?      Since voldemort didn't kill Snape, Nagini did... Find images by size: find / file / awk I've been trying to find png image files a certain height (over 500px).  I know that file will return image dimensions.  Example:    $ file TestImg1a.png  TestImg1a.png: PNG image data, 764 x 200, 4-bit colormap, non-interlaced      But I need to use this to find all files in a directory with a height over 500px.  I know how to print out all files regardless of height:  find . -name '*.png' | xargs file | awk '{print $7 " " $1}'   But how do I limit the $7 to those results greater than 500? Notify more frequently than once a day? Is there a way to subscribe to a question and be notified more frequently than once a day?  I'd like to be notified immediately on any posts to a question. So I have an SQL dump file that needs to be loaded using mysql_query(). Unfortunately, it's not possible to execute multiple queries with it.  -> It cannot be assumed that the mysql command-line client (mysql --help) is installed -- for loading the SQL file directly  -> It cannot be assumed that the mysqli extension is installed  /* contents of dump.sql, including comments */ DELETE FROM t3 WHERE body = 'some text; with semicolons; scattered; throughout'; DELETE FROM t2 WHERE name = 'hello'; DELETE FROM t1 WHERE id = 1;   The explode() below won't work because some of the dump content's values contain semicolons.  $sql = explode(';', file_get_contents('dump.sql')); foreach ($sql as $key =&gt; $val) {     mysql_query($val); }   What's the best way to load the SQL without modifying the dump file? I have a requirement for a custom app I am building to open an attachment on the parent record in a new window on create of a child record.  I have parent object Quality_Assessment__c with child object Chart_Review__c. Quality_Assessment__c has a PDF attached to it in the Notes &amp; Attachments section. When a user clicks to create a new Chart_Review__c record I need to have the PDF attachment on the Quality_Assessment__c record open in a new tab as well as the record create page for the Chart_Review__c record. Looking for help in generating the needed javascript for a custom button to accomplish this.  The 'Quality_Assessment__c' record will have a PDF file attached to it prior to the user clicking the 'New Chart Review' button.  My use case is to have users open the 'Quality_Assessment__c' record and perform what we call a Chart Review. To perform the Chart Review the user would click on a custom button called 'New Chart Review' which would do two things.   create a new 'Chart_Review__c' record displaying the new record edit page  open the PDF attachment from the related 'Quality_Assessment__c' record.    Preferably on click of the button the new record page would open in existing tab and a new tab with the PDF would open simultaneously. Add the ability to lock a question against edits Sorry if I keep asking for proof checks. I'll try to keep it to a minimum after this. I know this has a well-known proof. I understand that proof as well but I thought I'd do a proof that made sense to me and seemed, in some ways, simpler. Trouble is I'm not sure if it's totally correct. It's quite short though. I was just hoping someone could look it over and see if it is a valid proof. Thank you!  Lemma: Every Cauchy sequence is bounded.  Proof: Let $(a_{n})$ be Cauchy. We choose $ 0&lt;\epsilon_{0}$. So $ \forall \; n&gt;m\geq N_{0}$ we have that $\vert a_{n}-a_{m} \vert &lt; \epsilon_{0}$. Therefore $(a_{n})$ is bounded for all $ m \geq N_{0} $ by $ \epsilon_{0} $. Since $ \mathbb{N}_{N_{0}}$ is finite, it is bounded. So, for all $ m&lt;N_{0} $, $ (a_{n})$ is bounded. Therefore $(a_{n})$ is bounded.  I realize I haven't said what the bounds are but I think that's sort of irrelevant. So long as we know it's bounded. Any help is much appreciated! I've been looking at  $$\int\limits_0^\infty  {\frac{{{x^n}}}{{1 + {x^m}}}dx }$$  It seems that it always evaluates in terms of $\sin X$ and $\pi$, where $X$ is to be determined. For example:  $$\displaystyle \int\limits_0^\infty  {\frac{{{x^1}}}{{1 + {x^3}}}dx = } \frac{\pi }{3}\frac{1}{{\sin \frac{\pi }{3}}} = \frac{{2\pi }}{{3\sqrt 3 }}$$  $$\int\limits_0^\infty  {\frac{{{x^1}}}{{1 + {x^4}}}dx = } \frac{\pi }{4}$$  $$\int\limits_0^\infty  {\frac{{{x^2}}}{{1 + {x^5}}}dx = } \frac{\pi }{5}\frac{1}{{\sin \frac{{2\pi }}{5}}}$$  So I guess there must be a closed form - the use of $\Gamma(x)\Gamma(1-x)$ first comess to my mind because of the $\dfrac{{\pi x}}{{\sin \pi x}}$ appearing. Note that the arguments are always the ratio of the exponents, like $\dfrac{1}{4}$, $\dfrac{1}{3}$ and $\dfrac{2}{5}$. Is there any way of finding it? I'll work on it and update with any ideas.    UPDATE:  The integral reduces to finding   $$\int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty  {\frac{{{e^{a t}}}}{{{e^t} + 1}}dt} $$  With $a =\dfrac{n+1}{m}$ which converges only if   $$0 &lt; a &lt; 1$$  Using series I find the solution is     $$\sum\limits_{k =  - \infty }^\infty  {\frac{{{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^k}}}{{a + k}}} $$ $|e^a-e^b| \leq |a-b|$ for complex numbers with non-positive real parts How unique is the php session id How unique is the php session id? I got the impression from various things that I've read that I should not rely on two users never getting the same sessionid. Isn't it a GUID? How should I phrase a question that must be answered with an ordinal number (e.g., the third prime)? I am creating a type of adventure map. Once you enter the map, you step on some pressure plates that are supposed to seamlessly close the wall behind you. For some reason this command does not work when in a command block or just in text. Here is the command:  /fill -17 4 -109 -18 5 109 minecraft:light_gray_concrete   The output it gives me is "That position is not loaded". I am on a singleplayer superflat world in 1.14.3. Any help would be very appreciated! How do I fix a NoSuchMethodError? I'm getting a NoSuchMethodError error when running my Java program.  What's wrong and how do I fix it? Why $\lim\limits_{n\to \infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n$ doesn't evaluate to 1? I am trying to identify what the flaw is exactly when reasoning about a limit such as the definition of $\mathbf e$:  $$ \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n={e} $$  Now, I know there are ways of proving this limit, such as by considering the binomial expansion of $(1+\frac{1}{n})^n$ and comparing that to the Maclaurin series of $e$. So to make this clear, I am not looking for a proof of the limit definition of $e$.  I tried searching for "limit laws/rules" but none of the rules I found described the above case. Hence, I am looking for a specific rule (or perhaps a certain perspective) that will help me realize why the above does not in fact evaluate to 1.  My train of thought is as follows: at a first glance, if I wasn't already familiar with what the limit evaluates to, I probably would evaluate the expression inside the brackets first, and then apply the limit to the power. So, $$\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}=0\quad\text{and then}$$  $$\displaystyle\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left(1+0\right)^n=\lim_{n\to\infty}1^n=1$$  Why is my reasoning flawed? jquery disable form submit on enter Can a spellcaster use spell slots above their normal limit if their ability scores allow bonus spells of that level? This question is inspired by discussion , about how Heighten Spell works with Reserve Feats.  The question that I am asking here deals with whether or not players can cast spells using spell slots for spell levels that they don't have access to yet.    I feel like an example would explain this concept best.  Take Xylitol, the first-level wizard with an intelligence of 18.  He has 5 0th-level spells per day and 3 1st level spells per day from his class.  He also has 1 bonus 1st level spell per day from his high intelligence.  The  table says that he also has 1 bonus spell of each 2nd, 3rd, and 4th levels.  The question is this:  Can Xylitol cast 1st level spells using the bonus slots for his 2nd, 3rd, and 4th level spells?  He clearly can't cast spells that are inherently higher level than 1st, since he can't learn them, but can he cast 1st level spells using bonus 2nd, 3rd, and 4th level slots?  This has come up on these boards before, .  What I'm looking for here is a clear rules citation that clarifies this one way or the other.  The wording in the section on ability scores makes it quite clear that characters cannot cast spells that are actually higher level than their class allows them to cast, but it is not clear that these higher level slots are barred until the appropriate spell level is unlocked.  If a character has access to a spell level that they can't use because their ability score isn't high enough, they can freely use those slots for lower level spells, so why can't they use their bonus spell slots for lower level spells?  As KRyan's answer says, the Basics section covers this.  Based on questions and comments both here and elsewhere, that section seems to be worded ambiguously enough that it's caused confusion.  I'd like to find another, more clear wording to this rule if at all possible.  Answers from either D&amp;D 3.5 or Pathfinder are acceptable, but please note which one your answer applies to.  N.B. I'd like to note that I personally don't feel that players should have access to higher level slots like this.  There are a large number of locations where it's heavily implied that this is not the case, but I feel that finding a clear rules citation here would be helpful.  I can't find one that is clear for either interpretation here. Is my processor 64 or 32 bit? Fixing a code to highlight formulas and text on several lines In  I've found the following amazing code to highlight text on several lines.  The problem is that code dosen't work well with formulas : for example, fraction using the mode display are partially out of the highlighting frame.   Here is the code with one content showing the problem.  \documentclass{article}     \usepackage{soul}     \usepackage{tikz}     \usetikzlibrary{calc}     \usepackage{amsmath}     \usepackage{xcolor}      \makeatletter         \newcommand{\defhighlighter}[3][]{%             \tikzset{every highlighter/.style={color=#2, fill opacity=#3, #1}}%         }          \defhighlighter{yellow}{.5}          \newcommand{\highlight@DoHighlight}{             \fill[                 outer sep = -15pt, inner sep = 0pt,                  every highlighter, this highlighter              ](                 $(begin highlight)+(0,8pt)$) rectangle ($(end highlight)+(0,-3pt)$             );         }          \newcommand{\highlight@BeginHighlight}{             \coordinate (begin highlight) at (0,0) ;         }          \newcommand{\highlight@EndHighlight}{             \coordinate (end highlight) at (0,0) ;         }          \newdimen\highlight@previous         \newdimen\highlight@current          \DeclareRobustCommand*\highlight[1][]{%             \tikzset{this highlighter/.style={#1}}%             \SOUL@setup             %             \def\SOUL@preamble{%                 \begin{tikzpicture}[overlay, remember picture]                     \highlight@BeginHighlight                     \highlight@EndHighlight                 \end{tikzpicture}%             }%             %             \def\SOUL@postamble{%                 \begin{tikzpicture}[overlay, remember picture]                     \highlight@EndHighlight                     \highlight@DoHighlight                 \end{tikzpicture}%             }%             %             \def\SOUL@everyhyphen{%                 \discretionary{%                     \SOUL@setkern\SOUL@hyphkern                     \SOUL@sethyphenchar                     \tikz[overlay, remember picture] \highlight@EndHighlight ;%                 }{}{%                     \SOUL@setkern\SOUL@charkern                 }%             }%             %             \def\SOUL@everyexhyphen##1{%                 \SOUL@setkern\SOUL@hyphkern                 \hbox{##1}%                 \discretionary{%                     \tikz[overlay, remember picture] \highlight@EndHighlight ;%                 }{}{%                     \SOUL@setkern\SOUL@charkern                 }%             }%             %             \def\SOUL@everysyllable{%                 \begin{tikzpicture}[overlay, remember picture]                     \path let \p0 = (begin highlight), \p1 = (0,0) in \pgfextra                     \global\highlight@previous=\y0                     \global\highlight@current =\y1                     \endpgfextra (0,0) ;                     \ifdim\highlight@current &lt; \highlight@previous                         \highlight@DoHighlight                         \highlight@BeginHighlight                     \fi                 \end{tikzpicture}%                 \the\SOUL@syllable                 \tikz[overlay, remember picture] \highlight@EndHighlight ;%             }%             \SOUL@         }     \makeatother   \begin{document}  Lorem ipsum \highlight{dolor sit amet, consectetur adipis-icing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor} incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation \highlight[red]{ullamco $laboris$ nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit} in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.  Excepteur sint occaecat \highlight[green, draw=blue]{cupidatat non proident  $\dfrac{789}{7889}$ % The frame is not good for that formula ! suntinculpaquiofficiadeseruntmollitanimidestlaborum. Loremipsumdolorsitametconsecteturadipisicingelitseddoeiusmodtemporincididuntutlabore-etdoloremagnaaliqua.} I suppose I could write some more text here.  \end{document}     Is someone could help me to fix it?