How can I upgrade to Windows 10 and still dual boot?
Install Windows 10 alongside Ubuntu 14.04
How do I log into my Linux laptop if I have forgotten both the username and password? another balls and bins question I've seen many variations of this problem but I can't find a good, thorough explanation on how to solve it. I'm not just looking for a solution, but a step-by-step explanation on how to derive the solution.  So the problem at hand is:   You have m balls and n bins. Consider throwing each ball into a bin uniformly and at random.    What is the expected number of bins that are empty, in terms of m and n? What is the expected number of bins that contain exactly 1 ball, in terms of m and n?   How would I approach solving this problem?  Thanks! Mouse gestures for Unity desktop Change this behavior to allow for spelling corrections and the like: "Edits must be at least 6 characters" "Easy" vs. "simple" Are those two words equivalent or is there a difference? When would I say something is easy rather than simple, or vice versa? I am using Ubuntu 11.10 and my screensaver keeps coming on while I'm watching a movie.  I don't remember this happening in 11.04 and can't remember how to stop it? When I import text file into R, I get a special character appended to the first value of the first column Downloading multiple files with youtube-dl I use youtube-dl to download files from YouTube. I have tried downloading multiple files, but it is not working out for me. I have to open multiple terminals and start afresh every time I want to download a video.   Can you help me to download multiple files with a single terminal window by just mentioning all the URLs at once? I use Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit. XML attribute vs XML element I don’t actually need to run the command below, and I am aware of ssh keys if I did want to log in without typing a password. I would just like to know how ssh seems to circumvent my file redirection.  Running the following command, ssh prompts me for a password:  ssh nobody@192.168.1.151 &gt; /dev/null 2&gt; /dev/null &lt; /dev/null   How does this work? stdin, stdout, and stderr are all redirected, but ssh still manages to print a prompt on my screen and read what I type. I tried adding the ssh arguments -t -t and -T (not both at once), to enable or disable pseudo-tty allocation, but it made no difference.  I also tried closing all input and output this way, although I don’t know if I typed it correctly. Still, ssh prompts for a password:  (exec 0&lt;&amp;- 1&lt;&amp;- 2&lt;&amp;- 0&gt;&amp;- 1&gt;&amp;- 2&gt;&amp;-; ssh nobody@192.168.1.151) I see the  on the user page.  It seems to edit posts sometimes.  What is it? And why has it downvoted over 1800 times? See also: What is the best indicator in finding out whether a database is utilized or accessed?  I tried index statistics and  based on I/O utilization but none seem to be a good indicator.   Problem: I have a lot of databases on a development environment and due to space issues we are trying to decommission those that are not used without actually messing with the ones that are really needed. If you're interested in grammar, as I am, I am sure you have delved into a thought process about infinitive to, and like me, you have probably questioned what it is, or what it could be defined as. My mind always wants to place it in the Eight Parts of Speech, and I know this is foolish of me to some regard, so I stray from it, but I still wish to designate it under something that can be explain it. So, this is the motivation for this post, this question: What is the infinitive to, and why?  Here are my thoughts: There are three real possibilities, going back through the times. First, we can say that it is part of the verb that comes after it (to go, to run, etc.). This could be supported by the claim that you are not supposed to "split" infinitives ("To boldly go"), but only that.   Secondly, we could consider it a subordinator. I came across this designation most recently in my studies of modern and transformational grammar. As of right now, it is still the one I accept, especially as a result of the trend of designating more phrases as clauses. It works, except it's weird. Do we call this a unique subordinator as a result of how it operates? For example, to-infinitive clauses call for non-finite verb forms, which typically have an implied subject as a part of their clause. For example, "I want to go to the store." In the infinitive clause, "I" is the implied subject, as a understand. So, again, this works. However, things get a little weird when other subordinators come into play. For example, "I'm excited for you to win the competition." Now, if I'm right, those of you will say that "for" is a preposition here, as a result of the new-grammar stuff, but I'm going to count it as a subordinator, as defined by my own beliefs and that of a lot of other grammars. So, how do the clauses work in such a sentence? According to transformational grammar, "for you to win the competition" is defined as an ordinary clause. So, does that mean that it also contains a secondary clause within itself (the infinitive clause part)? If so, how do those two clauses work in conjunction to each other when one is so integrated? "For you to win the competition" looks to just be one clause, but if that's the case, doesn't "to" have to represent something else?  This moves us on to the third way to look at things, which is to consider "to" as auxiliary verb, a defective one at that. There are a lot of things to support this, and it even allows for the split infinitive. Furthermore, it calls for a non-finite verb form to follow, like an auxiliary. But, as I said before, it's defective in the way that is all it can function as.  As I said, I still accept to as a subordinator, but I want to be proven wrong or right. Wrong by showing evidence of it being something else, or right by showing how clauses operate when it seems to be layered up. Short story about a man stranded on a red planet with a sentient hand as his friend I remember reading a short story 10 to 15 years ago about a man stranded alone on a red planet, where nothing would be green, and so he would miss that color. There was a sentient hand to keep him company, and it talked to him. I don't remember if the hand was a native life form or his own hallucination.  The story was not very old at that time, so it may have been written in the late 90s or 00s. Celebrating the same new year several times over? Increase partition size on which Ubuntu is installed? I have Ubuntu installed on a drive. The problem is it is running low on disk space. This is installed on vmware. I expanded the virtual drive and booted into ubuntu. But when I opened gparted(sudo gparted), the move/resize option is unavailable. This is the partition Ubuntu is installed on, but I need to resize it. Any ideas? I am comfortable using command line Strictly Upper Triangular $n\times n$ Matrices form a Nilpotent Lie Algebra over $\mathbb{C}$ for $n\geq 2$ I have been attempting this problem for a while, it is an assignment problem so I don't want somebody to just post the answer, I'm just looking for hints.  Let $\mathfrak{u}(n,\mathbb{C})$ be the Lie algebra of strictly upper triangular $n\times n$ matrices over $\mathbb{C}$.  I am trying to show that $\mathfrak{u}(n,\mathbb{C})$ is a nilpotent Lie algebra for $n\geq 2$.  This is what I have looked at so far.  I have done some explicit calculations (I shall omit the bulk of them and just summarise below) for $n=2,3,4$ and have come up with some ideas.  Let $L=\mathfrak{u}(n, \mathbb{C})$.  If $n=2$,  $L^1 = [L, L] = &lt;0&gt;_{\mathbb{C}}$  So $L$ is nilpotent.  If $n=3$,  $L^1 = [L, L] = &lt;e_{13}&gt;_{\mathbb{C}}$  $L^2 = [L, L^1] = &lt;0&gt;_{\mathbb{C}} = \left\{ 0 \right\}$  So, $L$ is nilpotent.  If $n=3$  $L^1 = [L,L] = &lt;e_{13},e_{14},e_{24}&gt;_\mathbb{C}$  $L^2 = [L,L^1] = &lt;e_{14}&gt;_{\mathbb{C}}$  $L^3 = [L, L^2] = &lt;0&gt;_{\mathbb{C}} = \left\{ 0 \right\}$  So, $L$ is nilpotent.  So my hypothesis so far is that for an arbitrary $m\in\mathbb{N}$, $L^{m-1}=\{0\}$  My instinct is to do this by induction. My base case, $n=2$ has already been shown. Now I assume that $\mathfrak{u}(n,\mathbb{C})$ is nilpotent for $n=k$ ($k\in\mathbb{N}$) and consider the case for n=k+1.  However, I have no idea how to link these two cases together. I have read in Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory - J.E. Humphreys that $L^k$ should be spanned by basis vectors $e_{ij}$ where $j-i=k+1$ - however in my calculations for $L^1$, I obtain an $e_{14}$ which does not satisfy 4-1=2.  Am I missing something completely obvious? Or have I made a mistake somewhere? (I have checked my calculations numerous times, but cannot find any errors!)  Thanks,  Andy. 1.  Why is the wave function complex? I've collected some layman explanations but they are incomplete and unsatisfactory. However in the book by Merzbacher in the initial few pages he provides an explanation that I need some help with: that the de Broglie wavelength and the wavelength of an elastic wave do not show similar properties under a Galilean transformation. He basically says that both are equivalent under a gauge transform and also, separately by Lorentz transforms. This, accompanied with the observation that $\psi$ is not observable, so there is no "reason for it being real". Can someone give me an intuitive prelude by what is a gauge transform and why does it give the same result as a Lorentz tranformation in a non-relativistic setting? And eventually how in this "grand scheme" the complex nature of the wave function becomes evident.. in a way that a dummy like me can understand.  2.   A wavefunction can be thought of as a scalar field (has a scalar value in every point ($r,t$) given by $\psi:\mathbb{R^3}\times \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ and also as a ray in Hilbert space (a vector). How are these two perspectives the same (this is possibly something elementary that I am missing out, or getting confused by definitions and terminology, if that is the case I am desperate for help ;)   3.   One way I have thought about the above question is that the wave function can be equivalently written in $\psi:\mathbb{R^3}\times \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2 $ i.e, Since a wave function is complex, the Schroedinger equation could in principle be written equivalently as coupled differential equations in two real functions which staisfy the Cauchy-Riemann conditions. ie, if $$\psi(x,t) = u(x,t) + i v(x,t)$$ and $u_x=v_t$ ; $u_t = -v_x$ and we get $$\hbar \partial_t u  = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \partial_x^2v + V v$$ $$\hbar \partial_t v  = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \partial_x^2u - V u$$ (..in 1-D) If this is correct what are the interpretations of the $u,v$.. and why isn't it useful. (I am assuming that physical problems always have an analytic $\psi(r,t)$). My background and gameobjects are 2d sprites not UI images ,I want to know how to make my background scale with screen size and positions of 2d sprits on it don't change after building game (webGl) like scale canvas with screen size and anchor points in UI elements .  Before building the game   After building Welcome back message suggests to upvote questions and answers even when questions are locked I just opened a URL to a question on programmers.SE and got the message:     But the question was locked, so I couldn't do what it asked me to do.  I consider this to be a very minor edge case bug and it's likely not worth investing developer time into it. But since this  I guess it's worth reporting even if it's just for making you aware of it.