Does a creature targeted by the Charm Person spell "know it was charmed" if it succeeded on the saving throw?
When does a target know it's under the effects of a charm/enchantment spell?
Update to Windows 10: What is going to happen to my data and apps? I have Windows 8.1 Update, if I update to Windows 10 when it becomes available what is going to happen to my data and apps?  Of course I have to do a backup, but I wonder if the data will be overwritten or not. Is it possible to view the scene in the viewport camera view at 1:1? A vessel is filled with liquid,3 parts of which are water and 5 parts syrup.How much of the mixture must be drawn off and replaced with water so that the mixture may be half water and half syrup?  What is the best possible way to solve this question? Terminology of the sequences of promoters in relation to DNA strands I'm studying molecular biology and I'm trying to understand an experiment which shows the importance of promoters in the relative transcription level (RT). The image below comes from Rolf Knippers' book "Molekulare Genetik" (8th edition).    The legend says (among other things):     Die erste Zeile gibt die normale "Wildtyp"-Sequenz der 5'-flankierenden Region wieder.   Which, in english, means something like:     The first line repeats the normal wild-type sequence of the 5' flanking region.   The column on the right gives the relative transcription (RT) level, 1.0 being the highest possible level of transcription. As we can see, the lines where some parts of the "5' region" have been deleted give quite low RT levels, since some regions of the promoter are missing.  My questions are the following:  1) According to  and , I understand that RNA polymerase reads and uses both coding and non-coding strands in order to synthesize RNA. Therefore, how did they manage to use the sequences strands regions had been deleted to make a polymerase "read them" and perform transcription?  2) If the polymerase reads the template strand in the 3' -> 5' sense, shouldn't we talk of "ATAT box" or "TAAC box" instead of "TATA" or "CAAT" boxes? Does it mean that the "promoter" regions they are using on the graphic above are actually on the coding strand?  Thanks a lot for your help. How do I update Ubuntu manually? I wanted to update Ubuntu manually, because I used CDMA USB modem and connected using wvdial, but it won't able to update Ubuntu via Update Manager, because my Ubuntu won't showing "Connected" message via network-manager.  Can I update Ubuntu manually? Am I should download separate files, or use terminal instead? What is the cardinality of the set of all topologies on $\mathbb{R}$? This was  on Quora. I thought about it a little bit but didn't make much progress beyond some obvious upper and lower bounds. The answer probably depends on AC and perhaps also GCH or other axioms. A quick search also failed to provide answers. This question is a possibly harder version of: .  Question.  Let $f,g :\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$, such that \begin{align} f(x-y)=f(x)\, g(y)-f(y)\, g(x), \tag{1}\\ g(x-y)=g(x)\, g(y)+f(x)\, f(y), \tag{2} \end{align} for all $x,y \in \mathbb{R} $. If $g$ is continuous at $x=0$ and not identically zero, then there exists an $\alpha\in\mathbb R$, such  $$ f(x)=\sin \alpha x\quad\text{and}\quad g(x)=\cos \alpha x. $$ Is there a pair of discontinuous $f$ and $g$ satisfying $(1)$ and $(2)$?  Update. If $\ell :\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ is a linear functional over $\mathbb Q$ (i.e., $\ell(qx+ry)=q\ell(x)+r\ell(y)$, for all $x,y\in\mathbb R$ and $q,r\in\mathbb Q$), then $$ \sin\big(\ell(x)\big), \quad \cos\big(\ell(x)\big), $$ satisfy $(1)$ and $(2)$. Discontinuous such functionals do exist, and they are obtainable using Zorn's Lemma (equivalently the Axiom of Choice.) This takes care of the second question. I've heard that Lubuntu consumes less resources than Ubuntu. Is it because of the fact that Lubuntu uses different desktop environment and window manager?  If so, would it be equivalent to install lubuntu-desktop on top of Ubuntu rather than doing a fresh install? I plan to attach my 2014 and 2015 annual leave letters to prove I was on leave, and a letter from my sales manager who was in charge of the business during my vacation.  I intend to explain all my sources of income in additional letter because the ECO calculations of my income were different from mine.   How else can I improve my new application? AC1200 Wireless adapter in Ubuntu 19.10 Harry Potter: Why 7? While rereading the entire Harry Potter series I noticed that the number 7 occurs quite often, for instance:    Seven books Seven Horcruxes planned by Tom Riddle Seven Weasley kids Seven years at Hogwarts Seven Harry Potters Seven people in a Quidditch team   Did J.K. Rowling ever mention why 7 was so important in Harry Potter? Why was Sirius ever convicted? scope of clause within complex sentence If I said, &quot;I will run, not if it is snowing, if I my shoes are comfortable.&quot; Does the &quot;if my shoes are comfortable&quot; modify the &quot;I will run&quot; clause? I agree the sentence would be clearer with the addition of &quot;and&quot; in place of the comma. However, without the &quot;and&quot; is it still clear that the &quot;if my shoes are comfortable&quot; clause modifies the &quot;I will run&quot; clause? What is the symbol on the supply voltage that looks like a shaded-in capacitor? I am looking at  (dual low-voltage power amplifier). On the fourth page, there is a sample circuit; right at the V+ input there is a symbol that looks like a capacitor. However, it looks like it is shaded in. What is that? Is it possible to raise stats? I found a lot of dialogue choices requiring high Perception and I started the game with just 10 plus 1 for being an elf. With a magical helm and tower rest bonus I can temporarily boost it to 13, but is it possible to raise it permanently? I'm trying to parse json response.. but keep getting this error      Invalid conversion from runtime type List ANY> to Map String,ANY>   Map&lt;String, Object&gt; MapLv3 = new Map&lt;String, Object&gt;();      Integer x2 = 0; for (Object oh : CallsList){     MapLv3.put(String.valueof(x2), oh);     x2++; } index = x2; System.debug('Map Lv 3 ==&gt;'+MapLv3);  Map&lt;String, Map &lt;String, Object&gt;&gt; Map3 = new Map&lt;String, Map &lt;String, Object&gt;&gt;(); for (Integer a2 = 0; a2 &lt; index; a2++){     Map3.put(String.valueof(a2),(Map&lt;String,Object&gt;) MapLv3.get(String.valueof(a2))); } System.debug('Segment ==&gt;'+Map3.get('0').get('segments')); In the Wikipedia article , it says     After Newtonian gravitation was found to be inconsistent with special relativity, . . .   I don't see how Newtonian gravitation itself is inconsistent with special relativity.  After all, Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation is completley analogous to Coulomb's Law, so it would seem that, if there were an analogous "gravitational magnetic field", one could formulate a theory of gravitation in exact analogy with Maxwell's Theory of Electromagnetism, and of course, this would automatically be consistent with Special Relativity.  What about this approach to gravitation does not work?  The only problem I could see with this is the lack of evidence for a "gravitational magnetic field".  That being said, gravity is "weak" as it is, and my guess is that it would be extremely difficult to set up an experiment in which a massive body were moving fast enough for this "magnetic field effect" to be obsevable.  EDIT:  As has been pointed out to me in the answers, Newton itself is inconsistent with SR.  Similarly, however, so is Coulomb's Law, yet, electromagnetism is still consistent with SR.  Thus, how do we know that it is not the case that Newton's Law is the special "static" case of a more general gravitomagnetic theory exactly analogous to Maxwell's Theory:  Let $\mathbf{G}$ be the gravitation field, let $\rho$ be the mass density, and $\mathbf{J}$ be the mass current density, let $\gamma _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{4\pi \gamma _0}=G$, the Universal Gravitation Constant, let $\nu _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{\gamma _0\nu _0}}=c$, and suppose there exists a field $\mathbf{M}$, the gravitomagnetic field, so that the following equations hold: $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\rho}{\gamma _0} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{M}=0 $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{M}=\nu _0\mathbf{J}+\gamma _0\nu _0\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t} $$ where theses fields would produce on a mass $m$ moving with velocity $\mathbf{v}$ in our inertial frame the Lorentz force $\mathbf{F}=m\left( \mathbf{G}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{M}\right)$.  This theory would automatically be consistent with SR and would reduce to Newton's Law of Gravitation for the case of gravitostatics:  $\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t}=\mathbf{J}=0$.  (To be clear, you can't just set the time derivatives equal to $\mathbf{0}$ as it seems I have done.  Upon doing so, you obtain the corresponding static theory, which is technically incorrect (as you can easily see because it won't be relativistically invariant), but is nevertheless often a useful approximation.)  My question can thus be phrased as:  without appealing directly to GR, what is wrong with this theory? How to access Winter 13's Push Major functionality We are ISV Partners and all of our packaging orgs have been upgraded to Winter 13. One of the features of Winter 13 was supposed to allow us to push major release versions to subscriber orgs. I would have expected it to be in the previously existing "Push Upgrade" section of our packaging orgs, but that still only allows pushing patch versions.  If it didn't make the final Winter 13 release, I would have expected Salesforce to take it off the release page. Is this something we have to ask to be enabled? Removing duplicate strings from an array? Wouldn't it be a good idea to be able to vote for questions to be moved to any Stack Exchange site? For example, I just voted  as off topic, but that was all I could do. I wish I could've voted it be moved to .  It's OK to have the predefined list of sites that is now when voting to move, but it would be nice to have a more link, where we could pick any Stack Exchange site.  Here's a quick mockup of how I see this implemented:    When the more link is clicked, a list of all the Stack Exchange sites should appear.