Vault of Glass loot chests
Is there a point of beating Vault of Glass raid on Hard after finishing on Normal?
Why do I give my pets "food" but my livestock "feed"? When I feed my cat or my dog, the package tends to say "Dog Food" or "Cat Food."  In contrast, I give my chickens "chicken feed" or "poultry feed."  Likewise, a cow's silage is her "feed."  Why does this distinction exist?  Is there an historical or grammatical explanation, or is it merely idiom? Clarification for non-answers One of my flags for "non-answer" was declined and I was wondering if I misunderstood what "non-answer" means. I saw someone post an answer that was just a block of code, with nothing in it that was even the slightest related to the question, it was just a random block of code with no explanation. Should I have not used the "not an answer" tag even though the description explicitly says that it should be used when answers "do not attempt to answer the question"? Image viewer without large window borders I am looking for an image viewer software without very large window borders. I don't need any type of toolbar, just a simple image viewer.   It would also be fine if there is no top bar to close, minimize or maximize window. How to tell how many CPUs (cores) you have on Windows 7 What part of speech are non-human "interjections" like "oink" and "bang"? As a spin-off from :  If a human exclaims something like "ouch!", I believe it's considered an interjection.  But if a pig exclaims "oink!", what is the part of speech?  And if a bell goes "bong!", what is the part of speech?  You could speak of "an oink" and "a bong" as nouns, but I mean in a context like      The man went "ouch!", the pig went "oink!" and the bell went "bong!"   Are interjections only for humans? How can I search for one label but not another? What search query will return conversations that have the label Reading but not the label Ignore?  I've tried using label:reading -label:ignore but Gmail still returns conversations that have the label Ignore:    The query label:(reading -ignore) gives me the same results. Equation left margin I have equations inside an environment which has a larger left-margin than the main text (analogous to an enumerate/itemize environment, implemented with the changepage package's adjustwidth environment). Just as equations in enumerate/itemize behave, the equations are centered with respect to the entire text, rather than just the width of the container environment. I want the latter behavior.  I'm trying to accomplish this by wrapping all display-math in minipages. Namely, I'm modifying the mathdisplay environment in amsmath.sty as follows:  \makeatletter \let\oldmd\mathdisplay \def\mathdisplay#1{%   \newline   \begin{minipage}{\textwidth-\@totalleftmargin}%     \oldmd{#1}% } \let\oldendmd\endmathdisplay \def\endmathdisplay#1{%   \oldendmd{#1}%   \end{minipage} } \makeatother   This is almost working, but there are some issues with spacing which I don't understand how to fix. Here's how the the normal \[ ... \] and numbered \begin{equation} ... \end{equation} look with the above modification:      My main confusion is why the numbered version is behaving so differently from the unnumbered. But all in all I want to fix this so that the spacing above and below is even as it usually is. Any help is appreciated, thanks.  Edit: Here's a compilable example:  \documentclass{amsart}  \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{calc} \usepackage{changepage}  \makeatletter \let\oldmd\mathdisplay \def\mathdisplay#1{%   \newline   \begin{minipage}{\textwidth-\@totalleftmargin}%     \oldmd{#1}% } \let\oldendmd\endmathdisplay \def\endmathdisplay#1{%   \oldendmd{#1}%   \end{minipage} } \makeatother  \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}  \begin{document}  \lipsum[1]  \begin{adjustwidth}{20pt}{} \lipsum[2] \[ x \mapsto \hom(-,x) \]  \lipsum[3] \begin{equation}   y \mapsto \hom(y,-) \end{equation} \lipsum[4] \end{adjustwidth}  \lipsum[5]  \end{document} I have a long running BASH script that I am running under CYGWIN on Windows.  I would like to limit the script to run for 30 seconds, and automatically terminate if it exceeds this limit. Ideally, I'd like to be able to do this to any command.  For example:  sh-3.2$ limittime -t 30 'myscript.sh'   or   sh-3.2$ limittime -t 30 'grep func *.c'   Under cygwin the ulimit command doesn't seem to work.   I am open to any ideas. When I go to localhost/phpmyadmin I get the apache "Not Found" error (404). However, I can load html pages, and run php pages (such as &lt;?php phpinfo(); ?&gt;). And phpmyadmin is installed.  balter@homedevbox:~$ aptitude search phpmyadmin i   phpmyadmin                                               - MySQL web administration tool   I also installed the standard ubuntu LAMP stack and set passwords for mysql and all that.  What could be the problem?  EDIT: Here is where my phpmyadmin files are.  balter@homedevbox:/var$ cd / balter@homedevbox:/$ sudo find . -type d -name phpmyadmin ./var/lib/mysql/phpmyadmin ./var/lib/phpmyadmin ./etc/phpmyadmin ./usr/share/phpmyadmin ./usr/share/dbconfig-common/scripts/phpmyadmin ./usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/phpmyadmin ./usr/share/doc/phpmyadmin How to prove sum of powers property of roots of unity? Estimating the most important features in a k-means cluster partition Bold brackets in equations I want to write an equation with bold extended brackets.  For instance in:   \left[ \frac{1}{2} \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{v} \right]   I want \left[ and \right] to be bold. I already tried  nothing is doing the trick. dist$(x,A)=0$ if and only if $x\in \overline{A}$ (closure of $A$) Let $(X,d)$ be  a metric space and non-empty $A\subset X$. The distance from $x$ to $A$ is defined as $$\mbox{dist}(x,A)=\inf\{d(x,a):a\in A\}$$  I want to show that dist$(x,A)=0$ if and only if $x$ is in the closure of $A$.     (=>): dist$(x,A)=0$ implies $\inf \{d(x,a):a\in A\}=0$. Suppose $x\not\in \overline{A}$, then $x\in X\setminus \overline{A}$, which is an open set. Thus $\exists\epsilon &gt;0$ such that punctured open ball $B(x;\epsilon)\setminus\{x\}= \{y\in X:0&lt;d(x,y)&lt;\epsilon\} \subset X\setminus\overline{A}$. But then dist$(x,A)=\inf\{d(x,a):a\in A\}\ge \inf\{d(x,y):y\in B(x,\epsilon)\setminus\{x\}\}&gt;0$. This is a contradiction! Hence, $x\in \overline{A}$.      (&lt;=): Suppose $x\in \overline{A}$. If $x\in A^\circ$ (the interior of $A$) then $\inf\{d(x,a):a\in A\}=d(x,x)=0$.   If $x\not\in A^\circ$ then $\exists $ a sequence $(a_k)_k\subset A$ such that $a_k$ converges to $x$. Then, $\forall \epsilon &gt; 0, \exists N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $k\ge N\implies d(a_k,x)&lt;\epsilon$.      So that dist$(x,A)=\inf\{d(x,a_k)\}=\lim\limits_{k\to\infty} d(x,a_n) = 0$.   Please let me know if my proof is rigorous / correct. I'm not completely sure, think it's better to check. Extrude and bevel an imported svg curve Moving a very large (40 TB) DB from a 2008 server to a 2016 server Explanation of terminal objects using limits I understand terminal objects, but I falter when trying to achieve them using the approach of diagrams, the category of constant diagrams $\mathcal{C}^{\mathcal{J}}$ and limits.  I have the empty category 0, now I have a diagram $D: \mathcal{J} \to \mathcal{C}$. However this diagrams image should be empty, because there are no objects or morphisms to map. At this point, I'm confused, because I can't get to the universal property $\forall c \in \mathcal{C}. \exists! f: c \to T$ anymore, because I'm missing T. (EDIT: I get that this is how it is supposed to be)  But continuing with the category of constant diagrams, even if I have a constant diagram mapping everything to one object / morphism, there is nothing to map, so the functors image is still empty. So now I'm missing both $T$, and any kind of $c$.  EDIT: It seems to me, have I chosen 1, instead of 0, I would have come up with that is considered the definition of the terminal category. What am I missing? Using getline(cin, s) after cin Work done in adiabatic process "If" and "Whether" - Is interrogative IF always replacable by WHETHER? I am asking here specifically about if and whether  when they introduce embedded questions (or to be more technically accurate, subordinate interrogative clauses):  I don't know if Bob's here. I don't know whether Bob's here.  In the sentence above we can freely replace if with whether. There are some situations in which the reverse does not apply. We cannot always replace whether with if. For example in standard English, we cannot normally use if after a preposition:  The question of whether he is actually eligible didn't arise. *The question of if he is actually eligible didn't arise.  We cannot usually use interrogative-if directly followed by or not:  It's unclear whether or not he's a real elephant. *It's unclear if or not he's a real elephant.  There are several more examples. However, what I want to know is:  Are there any examples where we can use interrogative-if but we can't use whether?   Edit note: There is an if that we find in conditionals that can't be replaced by whether. However, this is conditional, not interrogative, if. System of congruences with variable