Does a wave blue-shifted by the doppler effect increase in energy?
Conservation of energy and Doppler effect?
I created a test MVC sharepoint app succesfully in a solution. Now I need to integrate this into a main solution project.   But when I added a SharePoint MVC App into the solution and hit F5, I am getting following error:  Error occurred in deployment step 'Install app for SharePoint':  Failed to install app for SharePoint. Please see the output window for details.   Detailed stack trace:  CorrelationId: 50583239-71cb-4b07-8bcb-4bbc51a22631      ErrorDetail: There was a problem with activating the app web definition.      ErrorType: App      ErrorTypeName: App Related      ExceptionMessage: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: Exception from HRESULT: 0x81070964 ---&gt; System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: Exception from HRESULT: 0x81070964 at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.EnableModuleFromXml(String bstrSetupDirectory, String bstrFeatureDirectory, String bstrUrl, String bstrXML, Boolean fForceUnghost, ISPEnableModuleCallback pModuleContext) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.EnableModuleFromXml(String bstrSetupDirectory, String bstrFeatureDirectory, String bstrUrl, String bstrXML, Boolean fForceUnghost, ISPEnableModuleCallback pModuleContext) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPElementDefinitionCollection.ProvisionModules(SPFeaturePropertyCollection props, SPSite site, SPWeb web, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean fForce) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPElementDefinitionCollection.ProvisionElements(SPFeaturePropertyCollection props, SPWebApplication webapp, SPSite site, SPWeb web, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean fForce) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeature.Activate(SPSite siteParent, SPWeb webParent, SPFeaturePropertyCollection props, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean fForce) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeatureCollection.AddInternal(SPFeatureDefinition featdef, Version version, SPFeaturePropertyCollection properties, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean force, Boolean fMarkOnly) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeatureCollection.AddInternalWithName(Guid featureId, Int32 compatibilityLevel, String featureName, Version version, SPFeaturePropertyCollection properties, SPFeatureActivateFlags activateFlags, Boolean force, Boolean fMarkOnly, SPFeatureDefinitionScope featdefScope) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeatureCollection.AddInternal(Guid featureId, Version version, SPFeaturePropertyCollection properties, Boolean force, Boolean fMarkOnly, SPFeatureDefinitionScope featdefScope) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFeatureCollection.Add(Guid featureId, Boolean force, SPFeatureDefinitionScope featdefScope) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPUserSolutionCollection.EnsureWebFeaturesActivated(SPUserSolution solution) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Packaging.SPUserCodeSolutionDeploymentGroup.ActivateSolution(SPWeb web, SPUserSolution solution) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Packaging.SPUserCodeSolutionDeploymentGroup.Deploy() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAppTask.DeployOperation() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Lifecycle.MonitoredTaskExecution.DoTask()      Source: AppWeb      SourceName: App Web Deployment   Can somebody shed a light on this issue? :) Some forms may contain confidential information - even something basic like where a person lives.   What measures do Cognito Forms take to ensure that data stored within its site is secure? My foreign school book is not clearest at this point, what is really needed with this? What does it mean that "assign definite integral for $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{n+k}$"? I am not sure, whether I should assign it like this $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \int_{1}^{n} \frac{1}{n+x} dx$ and noticing that it is continuous then trying to find borders so that $F(a) - F(b)$?  (the book messes up all kind of Leibniz stuff at this point, a bit messy -- and just stating $\int f(x)\,dx= F(a)-F(b)$, but not even paying attention to different borders. As far as I know, it is important to specify whether borders depend on the integration factor) When you cast invisibility on your turn, and walk away from 2 enemies, do they get an attack of opportunity? When a PC is in melee with a creature, casts the basic invisibility spell, and leaves melee, does an NPC get an attack of opportunity? How can I verify a Google authentication API access token? How can I verify a Google authentication access token?  I need to somehow query Google and ask: Is [given access token] valid for the [example@example.com] Google account?  Short version: It's clear how an access token supplied through the  can be used to then request data from a range of Google services. It is not clear how to check if a given access token is valid for a given Google account. I'd like to know how.  Long version: I'm developing an API that uses token-based authentication. A token will be returned upon provision of a valid username+password or upon provision of a third-party token from any one of N verifiable services.  One of the third-party services will be Google, allowing a user to authenticate against my service using their Google account. This will later be extended to include Yahoo accounts, trusted OpenID providers and so on.  Schematic example of Google-based access:    The 'API' entity is under my full control. The 'public interface' entity is any web- or desktop-based app. Some public interfaces are under my control, others will not be and others still I may never even know about.  Therefore I cannot trust the token supplied to the API in step 3. This will be supplied along with the corresponding Google account email address.  I need to somehow query Google and ask: Is this access token valid for example@example.com?  In this case, example@example.com is the Google account unique identifier - the email address someone uses to log in to their Google account. This cannot be assumed to be a Gmail address - someone can have a Google account without having a Gmail account.  The Google documentation clearly states how, with an access token, data can be retrieved from a number of Google services. Nothing seems to state how you can check if a given access token is valid in the first place.  Update The token is valid for N Google services. I can't try a token against a Google service as means of verifying it as I won't know which subset of all Google's services a given user actually uses.  Furthermore, I'll never be using the Google authentication access token to access any Google services, merely as a means of verifying a supposed Google user actually is who they say they are. If there is another way of doing this I'm happy to try. I want to import graphics into my main input file using the macro \includegraphics. It does not work if the filename contains spaces.   also discusses this subject, but there is no solution there.  My compilation routine is latex->dvips->ps2pdf (because of PSTricks). Currently, for all my commands that require root access, I have to type them out on a command line.  I would like for the GUI to prompt me to key in my password, when sudo is required, instead of having to type out the commands from command line.  Is there any way to enable this? Previously one version of Ubuntu desktop had this feature out of the box.  This version of Ubuntu (that I am now running) I upgraded from a server installation.  I will add, my user account is already added to sudo group. Thus I can run commands such as sudo gedit or sudo apt-get but I'm not able to install software in the Ubuntu Software Center. Present Perfect with the word "ago"? First, I check that my native language is not English, and the problem described below met on one of the exams.   With this sentence:      "The most important news is that my parents [...] a new restaurant a few   weeks ago."   Is the correct tense to use the Present Perfect (have opened) or Past Simple (opened)?   I know that the word "ago" but rather that time Past Simple, but is it also possible to use the present perfect in some cases?  I would be grateful for clarification. Springer llncs TOC not working I have just booted my clean Ubuntu 18.04 LTS VM and tried to install some application with sudo apt install.  But got error message:     E: Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend - open (11: Resource temporarily unavailable)       E: Unable to acquire the dpkg frontend lock (/var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend), is another process using it?   What process created the /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend file in Ubuntu? How to gently stop it and take manual control on APT? Show that there is no solution to the congruence $x^2\equiv3\bmod5$.   I'm not sure if the fact that the only numbers divisible by $5$ are those ending in $0$ or $5$ will help&hellip; After doing a "sudo su -" on an Ubuntu 12.04 notebook I did a "crontab -e", added this:   * * * * * env DISPLAY=:0.0 /usr/bin/gnome-calculator   and waited for minutes. Nothing Happened. I don't have any external monitors and if I run this command "env DISPLAY=:0.0 /usr/bin/gnome-calculator" in the terminal, it just works. But not from cron. Why?   The syslog only contains this:   May 24 14:37:01 localhost cron[1227]: (root) RELOAD (crontabs/root) May 24 14:37:01 localhost CRON[16432]: (root) CMD (env DISPLAY=:0.0 /usr/bin/gnome-calculator )   And I already tried an "xhost +localhost".   [root@NOTEBOOK /var/log] xhost access control enabled, only authorized clients can connect INET:localhost.localdomain SI:localuser:USERNAME [root@NOTEBOOK /var/log]    So the solution for another question like this on askubunut didn't worked. Increasing real valued function whose image set is connected Let $S = [0,1) \cup [2,3]$ and $f\colon S \rightarrow \mathbb R$ be such that $f(S)$ is connected . Which of the following are true:  a) $f$ is discontinuous exactly at one point.  b) $f$ is discontinuous exactly at two points.  c) $f$ is discontinuous at infinite many points.  d) $f$ is continous.  I think $f$ is continuous . We need to show that $\lim_{x \to a^+}f(x) = f(a)$ for any $a \in S$. Since $f(x)$ is increasing, $\lim_{x \to a^+}f(x) \leq f(a)$. Suppose $\lim_{x \to a^+}f(x) &lt; f(a)$. Then there is $l$ such that $\lim_{x \to a^+}f(x) &lt; l &lt;f(a)$, which contradicts connectedness of $f(S)$. Similarly we can show that $\lim_{x \to a^-}f(x) = f(a)$.  I would be thankful if anyone would check my solution and correct me if there are any errors. Is convex open set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is regular? Convex set $A$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ iff for every $ x,y\in A,0\le\lambda\le1$, then $\lambda x+(1-\lambda)y\in A$.  $U$ is regular open set iff $A$ is open and $int(cl(A)) = A$.  Is convex open set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is regular? I see many posts on both this forum and elsewhere the discuss the use of a wide angle on a crop sensor.  For example, they discuss how at 14mm lens is 14mm on a 35mm film or full frame, but with a 1.6x crop sensor it is an effective 28mm.  My question is, is a 14mm on a crop sensor the same image as a 28mm on a full frame.  Or does "effective" include some other conotation.  I read that a 14mm can create distortion on a full frame and some vignette, so people seem to say using it on a crop takes out some of those edge problems. My confusion is how the lens is actually taking in the extra image.  Reading kenrockwells blog I learned that wide angle keeps lines straight, while fish eye actually skews the lines.    So with this as my understanding, I am still a bit confused how a lens that is curved in order to get a greater angle of view, will be the same as a cropped version of a less curved lens.  Or does "effective" only refer to the objects to the sides but not to the distortion of the image.  Or, if it is different, is it so small that for photography it does not matter?  A technically description would be welcome as long as a basic understanding of the situation.  Thanks!  Edit: To be more clear after the comments,  I am specifically talking about the end resulting 2d projection from 3d space.  I have read both those previous answers.  the first one is closer to what I am talking about.  However, it is still confusing for me.  I have experience with 3d modeling and projection matricies, which might be confusing me with this.  But for example, i dont understand the images having a 50 mm lens being drawn Starting from the sensor, so it shows a different fov for crop and full frame . If the lens is the same, it takes the same amount of information from the world, which makes a ray from a certain degree off the last lens projected into a smaller space, there is no projection from the sensor, so drawing the line from the sensor doesnt make sense to me.  The distance of the sensor to the rear of the lens must have some impact on the light projected but is not represented in the images.  Further, again from that first answer it says cropping is the same as zoom, but from what i understand from how perspective works, it is different, since a wide angle will project lines differently than a small fov to the same size, so cropping the center of a wide angle and zooming into something is very different.  This is easily recreated in an opengl application with varying fov projection matrix, i imagine in painting class people learn this as well.  A fisheye would be a good example, since if cropping was the same as zooming, a fish eye lens would keep the center exactly like a normal lens and then a gradient weighted towards the outside would rapidly create a warped perspective, but from what I see, it is even.  To me those images just look like its comparing cropped with full frame in regards to orthogonal projections. Series rearrangement and Riemann's theorem I think understand that when I have a conditionally convergent series, it consists of series of positive and negative values which are divergent and thus one can find such permutation of indices $\phi : \mathbb{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{N}$ so the rearranged series sums up to an arbitrary value, diverges or oscillates.   This is how I understand what Riemann's rearrangement theorem says, but how do I use it practically? For example, when I have the conditionally convergent series:  $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n}}$$  and I want to rearrange it to be divergent or to sum up to certain value M? How do I define such bijections $\phi$ ?  I appreciate all help. I have got the Client Cross Frame Scripting Attack alert in the recent CheckMarx scanner. However, it points to an auto generated ID.   I've seen the following links however, the I'm not sure about relavancy of the soluions given i.e.,          Regarding my visualforce component, I'm doing just one DML operation on a custom setting from a callout response. Also, I'm not passing any attribute to the component.   To give a background of the component, its just a list view of records from a different system retrieved through a callout on load via JavaScript.  Let me know if in case anything else is needed.   Thanks in Advance! Peace! The most efficient way to implement an integer based power function pow(int, int) What is the most efficient way given to raise an integer to the power of another integer in C?  // 2^3 pow(2,3) == 8  // 5^5 pow(5,5) == 3125 What's the difference between faking, mocking, and stubbing? I know how I use these terms, but I'm wondering if there are accepted definitions for faking, mocking, and stubbing for unit tests?  How do you define these for your tests?  Describe situations where you might use each.  Here is how I use them:  Fake: a class that implements an interface but contains fixed data and no logic.  Simply returns "good" or "bad" data depending on the implementation.  Mock: a class that implements an interface and allows the ability to dynamically set the values to return/exceptions to throw from particular methods and provides the ability to check if particular methods have been called/not called.  Stub: Like a mock class, except that it doesn't provide the ability to verify that methods have been called/not called.  Mocks and stubs can be hand generated or generated by a mocking framework.  Fake classes are generated by hand.  I use mocks primarily to verify interactions between my class and dependent classes.  I use stubs once I have verified the interactions and am testing alternate paths through my code.  I use fake classes primarily to abstract out data dependencies or when mocks/stubs are too tedious to set up each time. Pure significance of line integrals of vector fields I can understand how the line integral of a scalar function has pure-mathematical significance, representing an area beneath a curve. But is there a pure significance to the line integral of a vector field? The only understanding I have of this is the physical example of work done on a moving particle. Thanks for any insight.