Colorize letters in the given string
Highlighting or coloring certain words / substrings appearing in a larger string
Cycle option when drawing between nodes in TikZ Cycle lets you close curves when drawing, and  \coordinate (a) at (0,0); \coordinate (b) at (1,0); \coordinate (c) at (0.5, -1); \draw (a) -- (b) -- (c) -- cycle;   works fine. Shouldn't also  \node (a) at (0,0) {}; \node (b) at (1,0) {}; \node (c) at (0.5, -1) {}; \draw (a) -- (b) -- (c) -- cycle;   give the same result?  The former gives a triangle, while the second doesn't close up. Is this a bug or am I missing something regarding the cycle option?  (Of course, as a workaround I could use the coordinates to draw the cycled path, and then draw the nodes at the same coordinates, but still...) With regards to  post about  and the part about retaining reputation earned from deleted posts that have a score of 3 or better and were visible on the site for 60 days, does this also apply to self-deleted posts and will it continue to do so? I culled a few of my own answers over the weekend that were less than stellar, and my reputation dropped 1.8k, but the rep is back today after the changes were announced. I thought it would be useful to clarify that this also applies to self-deleted stuff. Help with proof that $\mathbb Z[i]/\langle 1 - i \rangle$ is a field. I have been having a lot of trouble teaching myself rings, so much so that even "simple" proofs are really difficult for me. I think I am finally starting to get it, but just to be sure could some one please check this proof that $\mathbb Z[i]/\langle 1 - i \rangle$ is a field. Thank you.  Proof: Notice that $$\langle 1 - i \rangle\\  \Rightarrow 1 = i\\  \Rightarrow 2 = 0.$$ Thus all elements of the form $a+ bi + \langle 1 - i \rangle$ can be rewritten as $a+ b + \langle 1 - i \rangle$. But since $2=0$ this implies that the elements that are left can be written as $1 + \langle 1 - i \rangle$ or $0 + \langle 1 - i \rangle$. Thus  $$ \mathbb Z[i]/ \langle 1 - i \rangle = \{ 0+ \langle 1 - i \rangle , 1 + \langle 1 - i \rangle\}. $$  This is obviously a commutative ring with unity and no zero-divisors, thus it is a finite integral domain, and hence is a field. $\square$ Let's say you want to save a bunch of files somewhere, for instance in BLOBs. Let's say you want to dish these files out via a web page and have the client automatically open the correct application/viewer.  Assumption: The browser figures out which application/viewer to use by the mime-type (content-type?) header in the HTTP response.  Based on that assumption, in addition to the bytes of the file, you also want to save the MIME type.  How would you find the MIME type of a file? I'm currently on a Mac, but this should also work on Windows.   Does the browser add this information when posting the file to the web page?  Is there a neat python library for finding this information? A WebService or (even better) a downloadable database? How to be granted root rights while browsing files/directories with Nautilus I'd like to know if there a way to be granted root rights while using Nautilus 2.30 ?   For example I'd like to move some old folders of long unused users from the home directory - remains of previous distros (Debian).   Of course I can open a terminal, but I want to know if it is possible to do that with a mouse in Nautilus. I have been reading Geoff Cumming's 2008 paper  [~200 citations in Google Scholar] -- and  am confused by one of its central claims. This is one in the series of papers where Cumming argues against $p$-values and in favour of confidence intervals; my question, however, is not about this debate and only concerns one specific claim about $p$-values.   Let me quote from the abstract:     This article shows that, if an initial   experiment results in two-tailed $p= .05$, there is an $80\%$   chance the one-tailed $p$-value from a replication will fall in   the interval $(.00008, .44)$, a $10\%$ chance that $p &lt; .00008$,   and fully a $10\%$ chance that $p &gt; .44$. Remarkably, the   interval—termed a $p$ interval—is this wide however large   the sample size.   Cumming claims that this "$p$ interval", and in fact the whole distribution of $p$-values that one would obtain when replicating the original experiment (with the same fixed sample size), depend only on the original $p$-value $p_\mathrm{obt}$ and do not depend on the true effect size, power, sample size, or anything else:     [...] the probability distribution of $p$ can be derived without   knowing or assuming a value for $\delta$ (or power). [...] We do not assume any prior knowledge   about $\delta$, and we use only the information $M_\mathrm{diff}$ [observed between-group difference] gives about $\delta$ as   the basis for the calculation for a given $p_\mathrm{obt}$ of the distribution of   $p$ and of $p$ intervals.      $\quad\quad\quad$    I am confused by this because to me it seems that the distribution of $p$-values strongly depends on power, whereas the original $p_\mathrm{obt}$ on its own does not give any information about it. It might be that the true effect size is $\delta=0$ and then the distribution is uniform; or maybe the true effect size is huge and then we should expect mostly very small $p$-values. Of course one can start with assuming some prior over possible effect sizes and integrate over it, but Cumming seems to claim that this is not what he is doing.  Question: What exactly is going on here?    Note that this topic is related to this question:  with an excellent answer by @whuber. Cumming has a paper on this topic to:  -- but that one is clear and unproblematic.  I also note that Cumming's claim is repeated several times in the 2015 Nature Methods paper  that some of you might have come across (it already has ~100 citations in Google Scholar):     [...] there will be substantial variation in the $P$ value of repeated experiments. In reality, experiments are rarely repeated; we do not know how different the next $P$ might be. But it is likely that it could be very different. For example, regardless of the statistical power of an experiment, if a single replicate returns a $P$ value of $0.05$, there is an $80\%$ chance that a repeat experiment would return a $P$ value between $0$ and $0.44$ (and a $20\%$ change [sic] that $P$ would be even larger).   (Note, by the way, how, irrespective of whether Cumming's statement is correct or not, Nature Methods paper quotes it inaccurately: according to Cumming, it's only $10\%$ probability above $0.44$. And yes, the paper does say "20% change". Pfff.) What diagnostic plots (and perhaps formal tests) do you find most informative for regressions where the outcome is a count variable?  I'm especially interested in Poisson and negative binomial models, as well as zero-inflated and hurdle counterparts of each. Most of the sources I've found simply plot the residuals vs. fitted values without discussion of what these plots "should" look like.  Wisdom and references greatly appreciated. The back story on why I'm asking this, if it's relevant, is .  Related discussions: Attempting to compile kernel yields a certification error I'm currently attempting to follow  guide in order to install the 4.5.7 kernel with Grsecurity on my Kali Linux desktop.   I am following that list of instructions verbatim, except for the fact that I'm trying to use Grsecurity's test patch for the 4.5.7 kernel and I'm running Kali Linux instead of straight Debian.  Every time I attempt to compile the kernel, however, I get this error following the line "CC certs/system_keyring.o":    CC      certs/system_keyring.o make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'debian/certs/benh@debian.org.cert.pem', needed by 'certs/x509_certificate_list'.  Stop. Makefile:951: recipe for target 'certs' failed make[1]: *** [certs] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jc/Downloads/linux-4.5.7' debian/ruleset/targets/common.mk:295: recipe for target 'debian/stamp/build/kernel' failed make: *** [debian/stamp/build/kernel] Error 2   I get this error, as I found out, for any kernel even if I apply no patches or modifications, so it has something to do with the tools I'm using to compile the kernel (apparently a system keychain of some sort). Can someone out there tell me how to fix my OS and compile my kernel?   P.S. Here is the output of cat /proc/version:  Linux version 4.6.0-kali1-amd64 (devel@kali.org) (gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Debian 5.4.0-4) ) #1 SMP Debian 4.6.2-2kali2 (2016-06-28) "debconf: DbDriver "config": config.dat is locked by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable" while installing packages I'm trying to install the flashybrid but when I enter the apt-get install flashybrid command, I get this error:  root@user-desktop:/home/user# apt-get install flashybrid Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done flashybrid is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable Setting up flashybrid (0.15+nmu2) ... debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable dpkg: error processing flashybrid (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashybrid E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)   I also tried this one to find what is already using that file:  root@user-desktop:/home/user# lsof | grep /var/cache/debconf/config.dat lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/user/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. dpkg-prec 4672 root 4rW REG 8,6 39658 1697827 /var/cache/debconf/config.dat   But I don't know how to fix this. After taking a statistics course and then trying to help fellow students, I noticed one subject that inspires much head-desk banging is interpreting the results of statistical hypothesis tests.  It seems that students easily learn how to perform the calculations required by a given test but get hung up on interpreting the results.  Many computerized tools report test results in terms of "p values" or "t values".  How would you explain the following points to college students taking their first course in statistics:   What does a "p-value" mean in relation to the hypothesis being tested?  Are there cases when one should be looking for a high p-value or a low p-value? What is the relationship between a p-value and a t-value? Eclipse CDT - Copy static resource file to bin_dir Finding a tricky limit How do I space quads evenly? Is there a way in blender or an addon that allows me to select a bunch of faces (or verts) and evenly distributes (or relaxes) them into quads clean quads.  Without screwing up the vert ID/order.  Edit: I would like to have the shapes of my quads to turn into perfect squares while maintaining the volume of the object and the vertex order. can u suggest me any short trick of solving these kind of problems. How to find last four digits of any number raised to some power ? Both DHCP and static IP addresses simultaneously on one interface We can use multiple IP addresses for a single interface in Linux (eg. eth0:0, eth0:1). But can we use DHCP and static IP at the same time? eth0:1 should have a static IP address and eth0:0 should be configured using DHCP.  How can we accomplish both? Geocoding USA addresses that cannot be sent over internet? For a one-time project, I need to geocode a few thousand addresses.  In the past I've used various online resources for this kind of thing (e.g., Google Maps API), but the addresses I'm working with have to be kept confidential - which means no sending it over the Internet, unless there's some iron-clad guarantee of privacy.  What other options do I have? I have some music discs, but every time I put it in a jukebox I can't hear it. It says it's playing, my friend (on PS4) says he can hear it, but I don't. All other audio is fine, I can hear the game audio fine, even if I have a world that's only me: it still doesn't produce jukebox sounds. It visually shows that it's playing (the notes come out of the jukebox) but there is no music. I play on Pocket Edition. Can someone help me resolve this issue? How do I get list of all tables in a database using TSQL? What is the best way to get the names of all of the tables in a specific database on SQL Server? solaris ssh ctrl arrow keys do not work WUBI installed Ubuntu not showing up at boot menu after Windows reinstallation