Unknown hardware device in driver updates
Abnormal behavior with iwlwifi driver: the device is shown as not working
How do I upload a file to an SFTP server in C# (.NET)? Does a free .NET library exist with which I can upload a file to a SFTP (SSH FTP) server, which throws exceptions on problems with the upload and allows the monitoring of its progress? Why can't light escape from a classical black hole? Is fractional scaling ( ) available in 18.04 LTS yet? I am waiting until this is available before I install. Is it possible to navigate to a Visualforce page from an LWC with parameters and community compatible The LWC framework includes the NavigationMixin.Navigate functionality that can be used to obtain URLs or perform navigation to generated URLs. This supports a number of different page types, as covered in the . What I can't find is how to create a URL to a specific Visualforce page, with parameters and compatible with communities. Using the &quot;web page&quot; navigation type seems wrong to me, since the URL for a Visualforce page varies based on whether access is direct or within a community. Do you know what the correct approach is for navigating from a flexipage via an LWC component to a Visualforce page in the same org, passing the page some parameters? How do I start Chrome using a specified "user profile"? Does copying a spell from a scroll into your spellbook consume the scroll? The text on page 32 of the Basic Rules that talks about copying spells does not explicitly state that the process consumes the scroll. Does it? Is there a secular, non vulgar alternative to "for heaven's sake"? I know for heaven's sake, for Pete's sake, for God's sake and for Christ's sake. All of those, however are religious references. The only non-religious equivalent phrases I know are for fuck's sake and its variations. Are there any non-vulgar, non-religious alternatives? I am very used to the general construct of for X's sake and am looking for something along the same lines that I could use in cases like  C'mon, it's just a scratch for X's sake! That's not even true for X's sake!  It does not need to also be applicable as a general exclamation of frustration (Oh, for chrissake!) but that would be nice. Basically, I'm looking for a synonym for the &quot;Oh come on!&quot; sense of for fuck's sake rather than the Oh shit! one.  EDIT: Since this has gotten quite a bit of attention, I would like to urge those who answer to read the entire question, not just the title. I am not just looking for polite swearwords but for something that can be used in the example phrases above. How can I obfuscate (protect) JavaScript? I want to make a JavaScript application that's not open source, and thus I wish to learn how to can obfuscate my JS code? Is this possible? Where to declare environment variables? What are correct places for:   Global environment variables meant to affect all users? User-specific environment variables? Dual boot windows 8 and Ubuntu with Windows 8 Boot manager Can you help me with my capacity planning? This is a  about  Related:      I have a question regarding capacity planning. Can the Server Fault community please help with the following:   What kind of server do I need to handle some number of users? How many users can a server with some specifications handle? Will some server configuration be fast enough for my use case? I'm building a social networking site: what kind of hardware do I need? How much bandwidth do I need for some project? How much bandwidth will some number of users use in some application? Can markdown mini replace an en dash with a normal hyphen in URLs? Android Respond To URL in Intent I want my intent to be launched when the user goes to a certain url: for example, the android market does this with  urls. so does youtube. I want mine to do that too. Parser for C# Which parsers are available for parsing C# code?  I'm looking for a C# parser that can be used in C# and give me access to line and file informations about each artefact of the analysed code. How to create a generic array in Java? Due to the implementation of Java generics, you can't have code like this:   public class GenSet&lt;E&gt; {     private E a[];      public GenSet() {         a = new E[INITIAL_ARRAY_LENGTH]; // error: generic array creation     } }   How can I implement this while maintaining type safety?  I saw a solution on the Java forums that goes like this:  import java.lang.reflect.Array;  class Stack&lt;T&gt; {     public Stack(Class&lt;T&gt; clazz, int capacity) {         array = (T[])Array.newInstance(clazz, capacity);     }      private final T[] array; }   But I really don't get what's going on. Why are date-based hats awarded too early? I just got the  hat which states "post or vote on December 21".  Does SE have a time machine now? Can a character use the Misty Step spell to escape from the Iron Bands of Bilarro? Can a character escape the  (DMG p. 177, listed in the SRD as the ) with the  spell? To clarify, I am not asking if the bands prevent teleportation. I am asking whether the bands are teleported with the character as he teleports using misty step. Local SEO Strategies What are your strategies for local SEO? For example, if you had a web design company in Lincoln, Nebraska, what would you do for your website from an SEO perspective? The man page for GNU find states:    -exec command ;     [...] The  string `{}'  is  replaced  by the current      file name being processed everywhere it occurs in the      arguments to the command, not just in arguments where      it is alone, as in some  versions  of  find.     Both  of  these  constructions might need to be escaped      (with a `\') or quoted to protect them from expansion      by the shell.     That's from the man to find (GNU findutils) 4.4.2.   Now I tested this with bash and dash, and both don't need to have the {} being masked. Here is a simple test:  find /etc -name "hosts" -exec md5sum {} \;    Is there a shell, for which I really need to mask the braces? Note, that it doesn't depend upon whether the file found contains a blank (invoked from bash):   find ~ -maxdepth 1 -type d -name "U*" -exec ls -d {} \;  /home/stefan/Ubuntu One   This changes if the found file is passed to a subshell:  find ~ -maxdepth 3 -type d -name "U*" -exec bash -c 'ls -d {}' \;  ls: cannot access /home/stefan/Ubuntu: No such file or directory ls: cannot access One: No such file or directory   which can be solved by:  find ~ -maxdepth 3 -type d -name "U*" -exec bash -c 'ls -d "$0"' {} \;   in contrast to:   find ~ -maxdepth 3 -type d -name "U*" -exec bash -c 'ls -d "{}"' \;  /home/stefan/Ubuntu One   but that's not what the man page is talking about, is it? So which shell treats {} in a different way? How to import a .max model into Blender?