df -h says / fs is taking 61G of space but its not
Disk space usage doesn't add up with df & du
Accessing bash command line args $@ vs $* I'm looking for a site, similar to StackOverflow, but with possibility to ask opinion based questions Since opinion based questions are not allowed neither here nor on stackoverflow, I would like to ask if any of you, know some other web page (outside Stack* ecosystem), where we can ask questions like:  "Which Java Web framework would you recommend to learn"   or any other, which by nature are opinion based.  EDIT1:  Allow me to explain a bit more - I know there are webgroups, forums and mailing lists BUT most of those are for single programming language or framework and I'm looking for something more generic. Stackoverflow is great because there are experts from all sort of programming languages and frameworks, so if it would be allowed to ask:   "Best web frameworks similar to ASP.NET MVC4"  I would get a lot of opinions, from different languages and frameworks, and that exactly what I'm looking for. How to add a script to Startup Applications from the command line? When to use virtual destructors? I have a solid understanding of most OOP theory but the one thing that confuses me a lot is virtual destructors. I thought that the destructor always gets called no matter what and for every object in the chain. When are you meant to make them virtual and why? I've always wondered this - why can't you declare variables after a case label in a switch statement?  In C++ you can declare variables pretty much anywhere (and declaring them close to first use is obviously a good thing) but the following still won't work:  switch (val)   {   case VAL:     // This won't work   int newVal = 42;     break; case ANOTHER_VAL:     ...   break; }     The above gives me the following error (MSC):     initialization of 'newVal' is skipped by 'case' label   This seems to be a limitation in other languages too.  Why is this such a problem? Maxing out gear with maxed out smithing, enchanting and alchemy I have level 100 smithing, enchanting and alchemy. I also have some nice enchanted gear, fortify smithing and alchemy.   How high should I be able to get my fortified equipment?  Currently I'm around 29% for alchemy and smithing.  How high can I get fortify smithing and fortify enchanting potions without using the console (cheating)? And how? Currently I get +147% and +32% respectively.  Is something like this possible without using the console(or photoshop)? Pointer vs. Reference What would be better practice when giving a function the original variable to work with:  unsigned long x = 4;  void func1(unsigned long&amp; val) {      val = 5;             } func1(x);   or:  void func2(unsigned long* val) {      *val = 5; } func2(&amp;x);   IOW: Is there any reason to pick one over another? If $\mathrm{Tr}(A)=0$ then $T=R^{-1}AR$ has all entries on its main diagonal equal to $0$ Standard Visitor visa refusal (Deception, V3.6(b)) and procedure for reapplying My mother acquired a criminal record in UK in 2010 when she was given a conditional discharge for 12 months and charged £85. This time while applying the on-line applications for her, I accidentally missed the criminal records column and replied "NO". The visa was refused with appeal and administrative review not allowed.  Can someone please suggest my next course of action for reapplying for a visa  It is an extremely urgent family matter, and I want the visa as early as possible. While researching I found in a blog some mention of a forwarding letter while reapplying.  Can someone please enlighten me on the entire issue? $A^m\hookrightarrow A^n$ implies $m\leq n$ for a ring $A\neq 0$ I'm trying to prove that if $A\neq 0$ is a commutative ring and there is an injective $A$-module homomorphism $A^m\hookrightarrow A^n$ then $m\leq n$ must necessarily hold.    This is exercise 2.11 from Atiyah and MacDonald's Introduction to Commutative Algebra, but unfortunately all the solutions available online are either very sparse with regard to this question or seem to use (to my surprise) a generalized version of Cramer's rule. Is there perhaps some other "cleaner" approach to solving this problem? Leading zero in umask 0022 Hubble's constant $a(t)$ appears to be changing over time. The fine stucture constant $\alpha$, like many others in QFT, is a running constant that varies, proportional to energy being used to measure it. Therefore, it could be agued that all running constants have 'evolved' over time as the Universe has expanded and cooled. Both the local and global curvature of the Universe changes over time implying that so too does the numerical value of $\pi$. All these things are however constants (well, let's say parameters since they are not really 'constant'.)   In  with astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle, Feynman said "what today, do we not consider to be part of physics, that may ultimately become part of physics?" He then goes on to say "..it's interesting that in many other sciences there's a historical question, like in geology - the question how did the Earth evolve into the present condition? In biology - how did the various species evolve to get to be the way they are? But the one field that hasn't admitted any evolutionary question - is physics."  So have the laws of physics remained form-invariant over the liftetime of the Universe? Does the recent understanding of the aforementioned not-so-constant constants somehow filter into the actual form of the equations being used? Has advances in astronomical observations, enabling us to peer back in time as far back as the CMB, given us any evidence to suggest that the laws of nature have evolved? If Feynman thinks that "It might turn out that they're not the same all the time and that there is a historical, evolutionary question." then this is surely a question worth asking.  NB/ To be clear: this is a question concerning purely physics, whether the equations therein change as the Universe ages, and whether there is any observational evidence for this. It is not intended as an oportunity for a philosophical discussion. I'm trying to do a number checker in imessage. We all know that there is no such api, so I'm trying to use the tools at hand. The main took with past issues on this site on this topic.  I made a loop that inserts a number into a string, and by the color of the number (blue - registered, red - missing), using the standard utility Digital Colors Meter determines the color of the number. Then, depending on the color, it either adds a variable with a number from the initial txt file to the new one, or starts the script from the beginning. At least it should be.  But something is going wrong in loop. It checks the color, inserts numbers, everything is fine, but apparently the wrong condition, apparently the wrong data types. It inserts different numbers into the scatter. Some will insert, some will not, regardless of the initial condition. What could be the reason? Where is the error?      tell application "Digital Color Meter" to activate     tell application "System Events"         tell process "Digital Color Meter"             click menu item 1 of menu 1 of menu bar item 4 of menu bar 1         end tell         do shell script "/usr/bin/python -c \"import objc;bndl = objc.loadBundle('CoreGraphics', globals(), '/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework');objc.loadBundleFunctions(bndl, globals(), [('CGWarpMouseCursorPosition', 'v{CGPoint=dd}')]);CGWarpMouseCursorPosition((" &amp; 1002 &amp; "," &amp; 222 &amp; "));\""         set rgbColors to words of (the clipboard)     end tell     if rgbColors is equal to {"77", "39", "38"} then         exit repeat     else         do shell script "echo " &amp; quoted form of n &amp; " &gt;&gt; /Users/oneone/Desktop/base2.txt"     end if   Only the color check condition for Digital Color Meter is presented here.  Through the do shell, the color is read at the mouse position and the variable is added to the new file. $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{\ln k}}.$$  I have some problems with this sum, I have tried most of the common methods, such as the ratio/root test, integral test, etc. I do believe it looks like a problem easily solvable by a direct comparison with some p-series, however, I do not know how to formulate the inequality.   I did try using the common fact that $\ln(x) \ll x^p$ for large $x$ but that of course only bounds it from below with a convergent series saying nothing about ours. Also I tried rewriting the 'summand' as $e^{\ln(k^{\ln k})}=e^{\ln k \cdot \ln k}$ but this did not really yield anything.   Any answer or hint would be greatly appreciated. Is there a way to force Google Chrome to remember passwords for sites that have autocomplete turned off? Clarification: I am a programmer, but ideally, I'd like a method that I could help regular users implement, too. Prove that $\binom{m+n}{m}=\sum\limits_{i=0}^m \binom{m}{i}\binom{n}{i}$ Firstly, how do I read it? Is below right? With braces   $$p \vdash (q \Rightarrow p)$$  The given proof is:    ${p}$, premise ${q}$, assumption  $p$ by (1) // what???  ${q} \Rightarrow p$ by implication introduction with 2 and 2.1 QED...    I can't really get the link between $p$ and $q$ in 2.1 ... What are the criteria for questions to be selected for Hot Network Questions? I really like the , where certain questions from the Stack Exchange Network are presented, along with a hotness rating that is described as &quot;arbitrary&quot; in its tooltip. Such questions also appear randomly on the sidebar on sites across the network, under the heading &quot;Hot Network Questions&quot;. How do these arbitrary hotness points work, and how are they used to select questions to appear in those lists? Lat Long to X Y Z position in JS .. not working Why does instanceof return false for some literals? &quot;foo&quot; instanceof String //=&gt; false &quot;foo&quot; instanceof Object //=&gt; false  true instanceof Boolean //=&gt; false true instanceof Object //=&gt; false false instanceof Boolean //=&gt; false false instanceof Object //=&gt; false  12.21 instanceof Number //=&gt; false /foo/ instanceof RegExp //=&gt; true  // the tests against Object really don't make sense  Array literals and Object literals match... [0,1] instanceof Array //=&gt; true {0:1} instanceof Object //=&gt; true  Why don't all of them? Or, why don't they all not? And, what are they an instance of, then? It's the same in FF3, IE7, Opera, and Chrome. So, at least it's consistent.