Can I still use my visa?
Is it okay to use my US visa after a name change?
Headphone jack not working? Usage of "shall we?" What does it mean and where would I use it? Forcing an 'added' alias to every command Is it possible to forcibly add a timing alias (for lack of a better way to phrase it) to every command in bash? For example, I would like to have a specific user who, whenever a command is run, it is always wrapped either with date before and after, or time. Is this possible, and, if so, how? I was looking at  and I didn't realize that Minecraft had some Easter eggs in it. Besides the Christmas chest Easter egg, and the sheep Easter egg, what else is there? Pressure and weight? (hydrostatic paradox) Consider two different shaped containers having same area: one is cylinder, the other is like an inverted pyramid (roughly). Both have the same level of water, the weight of the inverted pyramidal container will therefore be greater than that of the cylinder. But I know from Pascal's law that the pressure should be same in both containers. If the base areas are the same then the force (weight as measured by a scale) should also be the same. Why are the weights different? Evaluating $\int_{I^n} \left( \min_{1\le i \le n}x_i \right)^{\alpha}\,\, dx$ Let $\alpha \in \mathbb R$ and let's call $I:=[0,1]$. Evaluate   $$  \int_{I^n} \left( \min_{1\le i \le n}x_i \right)^{\alpha}\,\, dx.  $$   Well, the case $n=1$ is easy and the integral equals $\frac{1}{\alpha+1}$, for every $\mathbb R \ni \alpha \ne - 1$.  I've done also the case $n=2$ and, if I'm not wrong, it's $\displaystyle \frac{2}{(\alpha+1)(\alpha+2)}$.  My big problem is that I cannot understand how to deal with the general case. Any ideas?   Thanks in advance. How to get more info out of the uninformative Windows 8 BSOD? I've been reading a Wikipedia article that describes the symptoms of rabies in various species, and I want to add a clarification note about which species (or species) a specific paragraph refers to. How can I make it clear that I'm referring either to the singular or plural of the word "species" when the singular of this word is the same as its plural? "Species or species" is the only grammatically correct way that I can think of, but it seems redundant and confusing. Is there any better way to contrast the singular of "species" from the plural of "species"? Give an example of a relation R on $A^2$ which is reflexive, symmetric, and not transitive I am just looking for some clarification on this exercise:  Let $A = \{a,b,c,d\}$. Give an example of a relation $R$ on $A^2$ which is reflexive, symmetric, and not transitive.  I understand that if I was only dealing with $A$ and and not $A^2$ I could give an answer similar to:  $R = \{(a,a),(a,b),(a,d),(b,a),(b,b),(c,c),(d,a),(d,d)\}$  Here $R$ is reflexive, symmetric, and not transitive.  What is confusing me is the fact that we have $A^2$. I am not sure what I am missing here. I am looking through my book to see if I can figure this out, but if someone could help shed some light on this it would be appreciated.  Thanks,  Tony Help, I cannot get my test code coverage higher than 75%! Code below power outage/frozen meat We were on vacation for a week. The neighbor said we were out of power the whole time.  We have a chest freezer full of beef. It thawed but remained in the freezer unopened the whole time. Is the meat bad if it is thawed but still cold? Can we refreeze it and eat it? Add a UIButton as a subview to a UITabBar $$\sqrt{x + \sqrt{x + \sqrt{x + \cdots}}}= 5$$ "spent a lot of time to shop" vs. "spent a lot of time shopping" She spends a lot of time to shop. She spends a lot of time shopping.   Are both of these sentences grammatically correct and do they have the same meaning? Why do we need to discard one dummy variable? What is the probability that $x_1+x_2+...+x_n \le n$? Non-interleaved vertex buffers DirectX11 Calculate limit with L'Hospital's rule I want to calculate the limit $\displaystyle{\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{x^2\cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )}{\sin x}}$.   I have done the following:    It holds that $\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{x^2\cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )}{\sin x}=\frac{0}{0}$.   So, we can use L'Hospital's rule:  \begin{align*}\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{x^2\cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )}{\sin x}&amp;=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{x^2\cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )}{\sin x} \\ &amp;=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\left (x^2\cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\right )'}{\left (\sin x\right )'} =\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{2x\cdot \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )+x^2\cdot \left (-\sin \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\right )\cdot \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )'}{\cos x} \\ &amp;=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{2x\cdot \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )-x^2\cdot \sin \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\cdot \left (-\frac{1}{x^2}\right )}{\cos x} \\ &amp; =\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{2x\cdot \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )+\sin \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )}{\cos x}=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\left (2x\cdot \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )+\sin \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\right ) \\ &amp; =\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\left (2x\cdot \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\right )+\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\left (\sin \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\right )\end{align*}   We calculate the two limits separately   $\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\left (2x\cdot \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\right )$ :    \begin{equation*}\left |\cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\right |\leq 1 \Rightarrow -1\leq \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\leq 1  \Rightarrow -2x\leq 2x\cdot \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\leq  2x\end{equation*} we consider the limit $x\rightarrow 0$ and we get \begin{equation*}\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \left (2x\cdot \cos \left (\frac{1}{x}\right ) \right )=0\end{equation*}    How can we calculate the limit $\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\left (\sin \left (\frac{1}{x}\right )\right )$ ? The Tree of Life in Evangelion I've noticed references to the Kabbalah in a couple of anime I've watched.  One of them is Neon Genesis Evangelion.  Neon Genesis Evangelion has it in the sky in both the opening credits and in the series itself:     I also remember it was on the ceiling at NERV, but the best screencap I could find of that was too tiny to be visible.  So, my question is, Is there any deeper meaning to the use of the Kabbalistic tree of life, or is it just used because it looks cool? This question is a result of having too much free time years ago during military service. One of the many pastimes was playing tic-tac-toe in varying grid sizes and dimensions, and it lead me to a conjecture. Now, after several years of mathematical training at a university, I am still unable to settle the conjecture, so I present it to you.  The classical tic-tac-toe game is played on a $3\times3$ grid and two players take turns to put their mark somewhere in the grid. The first one to get three collinear marks wins. Collinear includes horizontal, vertical and diagonal lines. Experience shows that the game always ends in a draw if both players play wisely.  Let us write the grid size $3\times3$ as $3^2$. We can change the edge length by playing on any $a^2$ grid (where each player tries to get $a$ marks in a row on the $a\times a$ grid). We can also change dimension by playing on any $a^d$ grid, for example $3^3=3\times3\times3$. I want to understand something about this game for general $a$ and $d$. Let me repeat: The goal is to make $a$ collinear marks.  I assume both players play in an optimal way. It is quite easy to see that the first player wins on a $2^d$ grid for any $d\geq2$ but the game is a tie on $2^1$. The game is a tie also on $3^1$ and $3^2$, but my experience suggests that the first player wins on $3^3$ but the game ties on $4^d$ for $d\leq3$. It seems quite credible that if there is a winning strategy on $a^d$, there is one also on $a^{d'}$ for any $d'\geq d$, since more dimensions to move in gives more room for winning rows.  to a related question tells that for any $a$ there is $d$ so that there is a winning strategy on $a^d$.  This brings me to the conjecture:     There is a winning strategy for tic-tac-toe on an $a^d$ grid if and only if $d\geq a$. (Refuted by TonyK's answer below.)   Is there a characterization of the cases where a winning strategy exists? It turns out not to be as simple as I thought.  To fix notation, let $$ \delta(a)=\min\{d;\text{first player wins on }a^d\} $$ and $$ \alpha(d)=\max\{a;\text{first player wins on }a^d\}. $$ The main question is:     Is there an explicit expression for either of these functions?   Or decent bounds?   Partial answers are also welcome.   Note that the second player never wins, as was discussed in .    A remark for the algebraically-minded: We can also allow the lines of marks to continue at the opposite face when they exit the grid; this amounts to giving the grid a torus-like structure. Now there are no special points, unlike in the usual case with boundaries. Collinear points on a toric grid of size $a^d$ corresponds to a line (maximal collinear set) in the module $(\mathbb Z/a\mathbb Z)^d$. (If $a$ is odd, then $a$ collinear points in the mentioned module add up to zero, but the converse does not always hold: the nine points in $(\mathbb Z/9\mathbb Z)^3$ with multiples of three as all coordinates add up to zero but are not collinear.) This approach might be more useful when $a$ is a prime and the module becomes a vector space. Anyway, if this version of the game seems more manageable, I'm happy with answers about it as well (although the conjecture as stated is not true in this setting; the first player wins on $3^2$).