Boot Camp Fails to Save Windows Support Files
How to download Bootcamp drivers without Bootcamp assistant?
text processing rows to columns for a block I have a file containing lists on Solaris:  List A hi hello hw r u  List B Hi Yes  List C Hello   I need to transpose the lists as shown below:  List A    List B    List C hi        Hi        Hello hello     Yes hw r u   How can I do this on Solaris? What to do after visiting unsafe site Proving that orthogonal vectors are linearly independent I am trying to prove that $a_1$, $a_2$, $a_3$ are linearly independent.  I am asked to use vector product and prove that if $c_{1}a_{1} + c_{2}a_{2} + c_{3}a_{3} = 0$ then $c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = 0$  I am completely stuck on where to go with this problem. I would think that linearly independent then the null space of the space can only be equal to $0$. Would this prove it? How do I handle partially correct edits in the Suggested Edits review queue? Contradicting Instructions While going through the suggested edits review queue, one sometimes stumbles upon partially useful edits like . Trying to follow the instructions listed in the descriptions doesn't lead to a conclusive answer. Considering our example:   Approve edits that clearly improve the post ↳ No, not *clearly* Improve Edit when you can make additional improvements to the post ↳ I most definitively can Reject and Edit to replace an ineffective edit with your own substantive changes ↳ It is ineffective in the sense that it made the post worse overall (imho) Reject edits that fail to improve the post or that make it worse ↳ Like the last option: yes Skip if you are not sure and want to go to the next suggested edit ↳ Well, yes. But that is really why I am here, asking this question   Reasoning about the remaining Choices This leaves us with three choices: Improve Edit, Reject and Edit and Reject (the last one slightly modified):  Improve Edit  + Acknowledges that some things in the edit where correct - Learning effect for author might vanish, as the improvement might get overlooked - Can't leave a custom message for edit author (except in comments, which pollutes the thread) - Doesn't trigger the system which &quot;punishes&quot; users who repeatedly have their edits rejected - Rewards the edit author with reputation for a poor edit   Reject and Edit  + Clearly shows the author that there were problems with the edit - Still can't leave a custom message explaining the problems of the original post. - One has to partially redo parts of the edit that have just been rejected, which might feel unjust to the original editor   Reject with a custom note and come back immediately to make a good Edit  + Clearly shows the author that there were problems with the edit + Possibility to leave an explanation as to what was wrong with the edit - One still has to redo parts of the edit that has just been rejected - Seems to be a weird workaround for Reject and Edit   Something else?   Each of the three options come with their distinct advantages/disadvantages making it non trivial to decide which one to pick.  Or does the answer simply depend on the quality of the edit? Like:  Improve Edit for subjectively slightly positive edits Reject and Edit (Or Reject and Edit) for subjectively slightly negative edits My furnace pilot light keeps going out so I changed the thermocouple. Now the furnace will come on and heat up to the degree set on my thermostat, then the pilot light will go out and the furnace will not come back on.    Could the thermostat be bad and cause the pilot light to go out? Why has a circle when the point light through my glass？ I found there is a circle when the point light through my glass material using the circle render.  How could I solve it? Is a photon "fixed in spacetime"? I have a  for my phone, powered via a micro-usb port. The markings on it indicate that it will accept the typical 5V that nearly every USB port provides, or it will accept 9V for "fast charge".  I was under the impression that USB standards allowed for no more than 5V. My research shows that  has several profiles (up to 20V), and Revision 2.0 Version 1.2 includes a 9V profile.  Now I'm wondering: How can voltages above the usual 5V be provided without worry of damaging an expensive phone when connecting them directly (no wireless pad)? If things are running at different voltages, wouldn't that cause an issue?  In this example, 9V is used for fast charging, but could that 9V be sent to my phone? Do phones have a safeguard for this? The USB standard allows for up to 20V. That's a lot when expecting only 5V. Some "dumb" devices are powered directly off of USB, like cheap LEDs and fans that have no IC. Surely they would blow upon 20V!  I'm guessing there is data exchanged between the power source and the peripheral, ultimately telling the power source whether or not it's okay to provide more than 5V. Some USB charging cables don't have data pins though, which can allow for faster charging. In this case, it seems that not having data pins would be a restriction. Maybe the power source would have to default to 5V?. Unfortunately I cannot find an explicit protocol/explanation of how the different potentials are managed. I'm trying to fill empty space in my mesh, and I looked at the knife tool page on the Blender Wiki, and I'm not sure if there's a way to make it so that a new edge is made using the knife tool. I took a screenshot, and hopefully it'll explain better than I can of what I'm trying to do. Oh and I'm using Blender version 2.71, by the way. I received $1000 and was asked to send it back. How was this scam meant to work? Possible Australianism - netbank = a website + app by which an Aussie can do their banking, including transferring money to other people.  A while ago, I ended up with $1000 transferred into my account, which in the description looked like a netbank transfer, not like a cheque, cash deposit etc, and which looked like it had already cleared and landed in my account. Usually when something is still working through the bank's system it displays as 'pending', but did not in this case.  I received a phone call from someone, saying that they had accidentally typed in the wrong account number, and wanting me to send them the same amount of money back via netbank.   Surely bank account numbers have a checksum, which make it relatively difficult for a typo to result in a payment going to the wrong person? What are likely sources of them being able to find my phone number to call me? Obviously, the bank either being hacked, or giving it out in response to a query from this person (but surely the bank is unlikely to tell me my own mobile number if I claim to have forgotten it?). Presumably either my phone, or the phone of someone I have sent money to/received money from could be compromised. Has anyone heard of any instances of this happening?  I then went to my bank, explained the situation and said that I did want to refund the money through the officially sanctioned methodology. After the laughter died down, the bank told me to ask the person to fill out a form, then they would get me to fill out a form that would authorize undoing that exact payment.  I rang up the person to tell them this, and over the course of about a week received an increasingly elaborate story about how that wasn't working, they needed the money immediately, there was a fee to fill out that form and they couldn't afford to pay it etc.  After that, I never heard back from them again. I check my netbank for several weeks after, expecting the money to magically disappear, but it did not. This was probably a year ago, and I'm pretty vague with money so may not have noticed if it disappeared more recently. How were they expecting to benefit?  Were they hoping to get the transfer from me, and undo the transfer to me, to leave them $1k up? If so, how can an internet banking transfer be 'undone' once it has already shown as 'received'. Or was this to do with money laundering? The account they requested me to send money to was the same as the one that the money appeared to come from. This was a scam, right? Strange nonexistent link in a specific user's Top Network Posts I discovered a strange, blank link in 's Top Network Posts:        The above link and screenshot are of the user's Unix &amp; Linux site profile, but this issue can be reproduced on any of the user's site profiles other than Meta Stack Exchange (as the blank post appears to be on this site, and posts from the same site are excluded).  The link seems to go to , which features a really negative question ID (close to the lowest value that can be represented by a 32-bit signed integer, specifically -(2^31) + 1005), and lacks the title in the URL that is present in all of the other links. It leads to a 404 error.  Going to the  seems to go to an actual answer on a question migrated to this site, which happens to have a score of 13 (as of the time this was asked).  Why is the question ID incorrect here? Based on the duplicates, it seems that this affects posts (both questions and answers) that were migrated from other sites: somehow, the question ID seems to be getting messed up.  Update: It looks like the above linked user has deleted their account on this site, so the issue cannot be reproduced on the profile I originally reported. It can, however, be reproduced on . The errant link in that profile is , and the errant question ID seems to also be close to the lowest possible 32-bit signed integer, -(2^31) + 3412. Best way to remove an event handler in jQuery? I have an input type="image". This acts like the cell notes in Microsoft Excel. If someone enters a number into the text box that this input-image is paired with, I setup an event handler for the input-image. Then when the user clicks the image, they get a little popup to add some notes to the data.  My problem is that when a user enters a zero into the text box, I need to disable the input-image's event handler. I have tried the following, but to no avail.  $('#myimage').click(function { return false; }); How do I show this $\cos^2(\arctan(x))=\frac{1}{1+x^2}$ How do I show this?  $$\cos^2(\arctan(x))=\frac{1}{1+x^2}$$  I have absolutely no idea. Thank you. I would like to show that   $$ \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x-1}{\ln(x)} \mathrm dx=\ln2 $$  What annoys me is that $ x-1 $ is the numerator so the geometric power series is useless.  Any idea? I need to do create a file with a filename such as :&gt;?, is this possible somehow? Windows stops it. Is "coachee" even a word? If I am Rita's coach, is Rita my *coachee? (yikes) Is that even a word? Would it be correct instead to say she is my ward? What about terms for people at the other end of a mentor, sponsor relationship? Express the complex numbers given in Problem in the form $a+ib$ 2 different bibliographies I'm writing my thesis and I would like to make 2 "bibliography" references: The first one would be for the publications I'm in and the second one for external references. I've made one *.bib file right now and it's working but I have no idea how I should work with 2 *.bib files.  Any suggestion will be appreciated. Suppose $k$ is a field that is finitely generated as a ${\mathbb Z}$-algebra.  (That is, $k$ is a quotient of ${\mathbb Z}[X_1,\dots,X_n]$ for some $n$). Does it follow that $k$ is finite? What is the principle of underdetermination? While studying I read about the principle of underdetermination of scientific theories. I made some researches online but I am more confused than before. I read about the Quine-Duhem holistic thesis, but I do not know if is the same as underdetermination.