Preposition with 'line' when quoting from a text (prose or poetry) with numbered lines?
Which preposition in front of "line" — "on", "in", "at"?
My machine has a SSD (fairly small) and a Hard disk (large). I want to have windows and a couple of programs on the SSD but I want to have the documents folders (such as my documents and my downloads) on the HD. I also want the default install directory pointing at the larger HD. Can anyone advise or point me to a relevent guide? Thanks. Calculate total sum of all numbers in c:forEach loop How to show ascii art at the top of the terminal when it's opened? How do we control web page caching, across all browsers? How can I install packages without starting their associated services? As you're probably aware, by default when you install a package on a Debian or Ubuntu based system, if the package contains a service, that service will generally be enabled and started automatically when you install the package.  This is a problem for me.  I've found myself needing to manage templates for building LXC containers. There are several containers, each corresponding to a Debian or Ubuntu release. (There are also Red Hat-based containers, but they aren't relevant here.)  /var/lib/libvirt/filesystems/debian6_template /var/lib/libvirt/filesystems/debian7_template /var/lib/libvirt/filesystems/ubuntu1004_template /var/lib/libvirt/filesystems/ubuntu1204_template   Occasionally I will find that the templates have a missing package or need some other change, so I will chroot into them to install the package. Unfortunately when I do that, I wind up with several copies of the package's service running!  By way of example, I found the templates didn't have a syslog daemon, so I installed one:  for template in /var/lib/libvirt/filesystems/{debian,ubuntu}*_template; do     chroot $template apt-get install rsyslog done   And promptly wound up with four copies of rsyslog running. Not to mention two copies of exim4. Oops!    I read somewhere (though I can't find it again now) that it's not supposed to start services when running in a chroot, but that clearly isn't happening here.  One potentially viable  calls for temporarily replacing the various commands which actually start services, such as start-stop-daemon and initctl, though this is a lot more work than I really wanted to do. If I have no other choice, though...  The ideal solution here would be for Debian-based systems to stop doing this crap, but failing that, perhaps an obscure or undocumented command line option for apt-get?  In case it wasn't clear, I really want to keep anything related to managing the templates outside the templates, if possible. How do Stack Overflow questions appear in Google search results in seconds? Possible Duplicate:          I have noticed that when I ask a question on Stack Overflow and I go into Google and search for the question, it comes up in Google in just a minute or so.  How do they do this? I want the secret!  I am a web developer and I know about most things that you can do for SEO, but I have no idea how these questions appear in Google this quickly!  I think it's amazing! Is there an easy way to limit user bandwidth usage? I am having an issue with wifi; it seems when I'm trying Ubuntu without installing, it only detects connection via the ethernet cable.  I can't connect and none of the available wifi networks are detected.  $ lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 5904 (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 5916 (rev 02) 00:04.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Skylake Processor Thermal Subsystem (rev 02) 00:08.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Sky Lake Gaussian Mixture Model 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP USB 3.0 xHCI Controller (rev 21) 00:14.2 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP Thermal subsystem (rev 21) 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP CSME HECI (rev 21) 00:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 21) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 9d10 (rev f1) 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port (rev f1) 00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port (rev f1) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Device 9d4e (rev 21) 00:1f.2 Memory controller: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PMC (rev 21) 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device 9d71 (rev 21) 00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP SMBus (rev 21) 01:00.0 Display controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Sun XT [Radeon HD 8670A/8670M/8690M / R5 M330] (rev 83) 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 15) 03:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device d723     $ lspci -knn | grep Net -A3 03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device [10ec:d723]     DeviceName: Hanksville Gbe Lan Connection     Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:8319] I have noticed that the smackpacks say on the package that the package is meant for a 5 gal. batch and that you should pour the pack directly into the wort.   On the otherhand - nearly everyone tells me to always make a starter.   Is this just because making a starter never hurts or does the package contain wrong instructions?   I would have guessed that the yeast producers would tell you on the package if you should need some extra steps to get a good product. Why every polynomial over the algebraic numbers $F$ splits over $F$? I read that if $F$ is the field of algebraic numbers over $\mathbb{Q}$, then every polynomial in $F[x]$ splits over $F$. That's awesome! Nevertheless, I don't fully understand why it is true. Can you throw some ideas about why this is true? proving logical equivalence $(P \leftrightarrow Q) \equiv (P \wedge Q) \vee (\neg P \wedge \neg Q)$ I am currently working through Velleman's book How To Prove It and was asked to prove the following  $(P \leftrightarrow Q) \equiv (P \wedge Q) \vee (\neg P \wedge \neg Q)$  This is my work thus far  $(P \to Q) \wedge (Q \to P)$  $(\neg P \vee Q) \wedge (\neg Q \vee P)$ (since $(P \to Q) \equiv (\neg P \vee Q)$)  $\neg[\neg(\neg P \vee Q) \vee \neg (\neg Q \vee P)]$ (Demorgan's Law)  $\neg [(P \wedge \neg Q) \vee (Q \wedge \neg P)]$ (Demorgan's Law)  At this point I am little unsure how to proceed.   Here are a few things I've tried or considered thus far:  I thought that I could perhaps switch some of the terms in step 3 using the law of associativity however the $\neg$ on the outside of the two terms prevents me from doing so (constructing a truth table for $\neg (\neg P \vee Q) \vee (\neg Q \vee P)$ and $\neg (\neg P \vee \neg Q) \vee \neg (P \vee Q)$ for sanity purposes)  I can't seem to apply the law of distribution since the corresponding terms are negated.  Applying demorgans law to one of the terms individually on step 2 or 3 doesnt seem to get me very far either.  Did I perhaps skip something? Am I even on the right track? Any help is appreciated What are SPF records, and how do I configure them? This is a  about setting up .     I have an office with many computers that share a single external ip (I'm unsure if the address is static or dynamic). Each computer connects to our mail server via IMAP using outlook. Email is sent and received by those computers, and some users send and receive email on their mobile phones as well.  I am using  to generate an SPF record and I'm unsure about some of the fields in the wizard, specifically:   Enter any other domains who may send or relay mail for this domain Enter any IP addresses in CIDR format for netblocks that originate or relay mail for this domain Enter any other hosts which can send or relay mail for this domain How stringent should SPF-aware MTA's treat this?   the first few questions i'm fairly certain about... hope i have given enough info. I am trying to prove that the set of irrational numbers $\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}$ is not an $F_{\sigma}$ set. Here's my attempt:  Assume that indeed $\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}$ is an $F_{\sigma}$ set. Then we may write it as a countable union of closed subsets $C_i$: $$ \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q} = \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}  \ C_i $$ But $\text{int} ( \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}) = \emptyset$, so in fact each $C_i$ has empty interior as well. But then each $C_i$ is nowhere dense, hence $ \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q} = \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}  \ C_i$ is thin. But we know $\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}$ is thick, a contradiction.  This seems a bit too simple. I looked this up online, and although I haven't found the solution anywhere, many times there is a hint: Use Baire's Theorem. Have I skipped an important step I should explain further or is Baire's Theorem used implicitly in my proof? Or is my proof wrong? Thanks.  EDIT: Thin and thick might not be the most standard terms so:  Thin = meager = 1st Baire category Currently, a user does not get any notification when a trivial edit (less than 6 characters, by a user who has the ) is made on one of his/her posts. As in .  Even though the user is trust-worthy (owing to the rep of the user), wouldn't it be nice for the OP to get a notification whenever an edit is made, even trivial? I am trying to find the name of a direct to TV movie, possibly a 2-3 part miniseries which I believe aired on the SciFi channel in the 90s. I don't remember who starred in it, but the movie opened with an astronaut attempting reentry whose shuttle ends up exploding. He awakes in a large bubble of air in a river and after reaching the surface and swimming to shore, meets several other people, from seemingly many different times throughout history (including one alien, who died on Earth).  Over the course of the movie, we learn the world is the afterlife, where everyone goes when they die. The major plot involves launching a steamboat (built by Mark Twain, no less) to travel up a river to the mountains, where the beings responsible for bringing everyone to this world are.  Does anyone know what the title of this movie/miniseries is? What exactly is weakly informative prior? Is there a precise definition of weakly informative prior?  How is it different from a subjective prior with broad support? Someone mentioned that "veiling glare" or "veiling flare" was to blame for reduced contrast in a photo. What does this mean exactly?  What causes veiling glare, and how can it be avoided? How does it relate to those floating polygonal lens flares one often sees in movies? 5v output to 3.3v? I have a microcontroller and a Raspberry Pi, both running off of the same 5v supply, in parallel. The microcontroller has 4 5v output pins and the other is a Raspberry Pi, that can only accept inputs of 3.3v and less.    Obviously I cannot directly connect the outputs to the inputs - that'll fry the Raspberry Pi.    How can I connect 5v outputs to the GPIO pins on the Raspberry Pi? Why is a T distribution used for hypothesis testing a linear regression coefficient? In practice, using a standard T-test to check the significance of a linear regression coefficient is common practice. The mechanics of the calculation make sense to me.  Why is it that the T-distribution can be used to model the standard test statistic used in linear regression hypothesis testing? Standard test statistic I am referring to here:   $$ T_{0} = \frac{\widehat{\beta} - \beta_{0}}{SE(\widehat{\beta})} $$ We have a webservice that our application uses and the developers require https connections to the webservice.  Since this is an internal webservice would you use a self signed cert?