How to create default taxonomy term for a custom post type?
Inserting a term into a custom taxonomy
I have an object with two solidify modifiers added, but the modifiers are not visible in the view pane. How can I see the applied modifiers. This is in Blender 2.91 CodeIgniter: A Class/Library to help get meta tags from a web page? What points in the complex plane satisfy $|z|=arg(z)$. How To Reduce Noise In Cycles Render So this is my first try with cycles and I was wondering what can I do to make the image clearer? Hilbert space of harmonic oscillator: Countable vs uncountable? Hm, this just occurred to me while answering another question:   If I write the Hamiltonian for a harmonic oscillator as $$H = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2$$ then wouldn't one set of possible basis states be the set of $\delta$-functions  $\psi_x = \delta(x)$, and that indicates that the size of my Hilbert space is that of $\mathbb{R}$.  On the other hand, we all know that we can diagonalize $H$ by going to the occupation number states, so the Hilbert space would be $|n\rangle, n \in \mathbb{N}_0$, so now the size of my Hilbert space is that of $\mathbb{N}$ instead.  Clearly they can't both be right, so where is the flaw in my logic? Add high-resolution-graphics and / or .svg-icons Suppose one is trying to find the radius of convergence of  $$ \exp(x)=\sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^k}{k!} $$  This "proof" was given in the lecture: $$ \begin{align} r =&amp; \frac{1}{\limsup\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sqrt [n]{|a_n|}} \\ =&amp; \frac{1}{\limsup\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sqrt [n]{\frac{1}{n!}}} \\ =&amp;\lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sqrt [n]{n!}\\ r=&amp; \infty \end{align}$$  Other proofs involving the ratio test also seem to inspect the convergence of $\frac{1}{k!}$ instead of $\frac{x^k}{k!}$. Why is one allowed to substitute $\frac{1}{k!}$? What is a historical lock, and what is it used for? Historical locks are sometimes applied to questions.   What is a historical lock? What is the purpose of a historical lock? How are questions affected by historical locking? When is it appropriate to lock a question for historical reasons?  When is it not appropriate? How do I request a historical lock for a question? What should I do if I notice a serious problem with a historically-locked question or one of its answers? Is $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-7}]$ a UFD or not? Is $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-7}]$ a UFD or not? I feel like there should be some easy example showing that it is not, but I can not think of one. Good review audit has "possible spam" warning? I was looking through someone's edit history and I was looking at :    Why does it give this notice, while at the same time saying that it's a high-quality post? My proof is very different from my reference, hence I am wondering is I got this right?  Apparently, $F$ is continuous, and the identity matrix is closed. Now we want to show that the preimage of continuous function on closed set is closed.  Let $D$ be a closed set, Consider a sequence $x_n \to x_0$ in which $x_n \in f^{-1}(D)$, and we will show that $x_0 \in f^{-1}(D)$.  Since $f$ is continuous, we have a convergent sequence $$\lim_{n\to \infty} f(x_n) = f(x_0) = y.$$  But we know $y$ is in the range, hence, $x_0$ is in the domain. So the preimage is also closed since it contains all the limit points.  Thank you. Can we create a subsection of the References Cited section with different reference numbering? When do I have to use 'will' instead of 'going to'? Does going to only express an intention and will some kind of prediction that doesn't necessarily happen?  EDIT: Thanks for all your answers. I asked this question because I always fail to complete exercises like this from an ESL book:   We  will fly to Venice in June. (Correct: But, how can I be sure that I'm not sick in June?) Philipp will be 15 next Wednesday (Correct: Since his birthday is a fixed day, this will happen). They will get a new computer. (Wrong: Why?, If I need a new computer, I simply get a new one) In 2020 people are going to buy more hybrid cars.  (Wrong, Why? Who can tell for sure). bash prompt messed up on arrow up I have made some modification to my prompt with use of colors via tput.  It looks like now when I try to do an arrow up lookup after few moves up, the prompt is being cut into half, what I mean by this is:  From this:  PROD mysuer@server1.domain.com:~$ vim .bashrc   To this:  PROD mysuer@servegit rebase origin/add_pool   ctrl + c brings everything back to normal.  I have found some posts indicating that this may be due to the issue with missing escapes for [ however I don't see an issue here:  My code:  #red for prod, green for lab  COLOUR_RESET=$(tput sgr0) COLOUR_GREEN=$(tput setaf 2) COLOUR_BLUE=$(tput setaf 6) COLOUR_YELLOW=$(tput setaf 3) COLOUR_RED=$(tput setaf 1) BOLD=$(tput bold)  if [[ $HOSTNAME =~ .*\.domain.com$ ]]; then   COLOUR=$COLOUR_RED   PROMPT_TEXT="PROD" fi  if [[ $HOSTNAME =~ .*\.lab$ ]]; then   COLOUR=$COLOUR_BLUE   PROMPT_TEXT="LAB" fi   MYPROMPT="$COLOUR$BOLD$PROMPT_TEXT$COLOUR_RESET \[\u@$COLOUR$BOLD$(hostname -f)$COLOUR_RESET:\w\]\$ "  PS1=$MYPROMPT   UPDATE: @KamilMaciorowski has pointed out a similar question although it was not relating to a tput colors. Why do we say "try and" [verb] instead of "try to" [verb]? (E.g., "Try and call me tomorrow.") Protect .NET code from reverse engineering? We want to encrypt / encode URL parameters on our pages. I tried to encrypt a parameter using  with AES algorithm as explained in the   %%[SET @encData=EncryptSymmetric("test", "AES", @null, "1111", @null, "0000000000000000", @null, "00000000000000000000000000000000") ]%% AES: %%=v(@encData)=%%   The result of this function is      AT1r0irnzM+Ax1j8zN+zAw==   Then I tried to decrypt the value using an , but I always received an error message.  I suppose there is a difference between AES algorithm in Marketing Cloud and AES used in the online tool. Indeed if I encrypt the same word with an online tool (128-bit), I received this result      l4Yo3sFofFD1EMmtoh397w==   Do you have any deep information regarding this function? What could be the difference? I have a Virtual machine using centos 7 with 200GB disk.For some reason my layout is:  df -h Filesystem               Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1                100GB  95GB  5GB      Running fdisk -l:  Disk /dev/sda: 204.8 GB, 204803670016 bytes,400007168 sectors  Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes  Sector size(logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size(minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk label type: dos Disk identifier: 0x0006c283  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sda1            2048   199997439    99997696     Linux   I would like to increase my space on my partision /dev/sda1. I'm trying to prove that any group $G$ of infinite order has an infinite number of subgroups.  I think that if the group has an element of infinite order, then it's easy because I can take the groups generated by the powers of this element.  What if it doesn't? Every element generates a cyclic subgroup. Every element belongs to at least one cyclic subgroup (that generated by itself). So the group is the union of its cyclic subgroups. If all these are finite, we would have to have an infinite collection of subgroups anyway.  Is that correct? How to import sextante(processing) for QGIS 1.9 (2.0)