Issue with creating URL to invoke email functionality in Lightning
How to put a variable in anchor tag
I have a box that I have extruded to the shape I want. Then I placed a cylinder so that it intersects the box. After that I deleted the bottom faces of both the cylinder and box.  Now what I want to do is delete the portion of the cylinder that is inside the box and join the nodes so that it is one object. I have already joined the meshes so I can select points/edges/faces from either shape. It seems like the easiest way would be to just put nodes where the edges of the cylinder and box intersect and then delete the parts I don't care about. I can't find a good way to do that though.  What's the best way to accomplish what I'm trying to do? Assume you cast Barkskin in humanoid form:     You touch a willing creature. Until the spell ends, the target’s skin has a rough, bark-like appearance, and the target’s AC can’t be less than 16, regardless of what kind of arm or it is wearing.   It is clear that under the rules of Wild Shape "transforming doesn’t break your concentration on a spell you’ve already cast", but does the effect of the spell carry over to your new skin? Would Beetee's electrocution plan work and kill the tributes in the lake? In , the second episode of the Hunger Games trilogy, one of the characters (Beetee) proposes a plan to kill some of the remaining tributes. He proposes wrapping a special wire that he has designed to withstand the vast energy of lightning around a tall tree and running it down to a salt water lake. Then when lightening strikes the tree (which it does predictably every twelve hours) anyone in the lake will be killed. (N.B. This is not Beetee's real plan, but it is the one he wants his allies to believe.)  I don't think his plan would work at all. Assuming that his wire can carry the enormous current delivered by a lightening strike (this is fiction after all) surely the current would short to ground through the salt water rather than taking a path through anyone standing or swimming in the water. The analogy I have in mind is that of birds standing untroubled on live electricity wires. They are unharmed because they do not provide a path to earth. But another analogy might be dropping a mains electric heater into a bath when you are in it. I think that kills you (though I'm not sure why.) problem with surfaces on tkz-fct i am using this wonderful tool that tkz-fct is for creating nice documents but I have a weird result from recently. This is my document :  \documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{calc} \usepackage{color} \usepackage{pifont}                     %pour utiliser la police Ding \usepackage[left=1.5cm,right=1.5cm,top=2cm,bottom=2cm]{geometry} %marges du document \usepackage[french]{babel} \usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{xcolor} \usepackage[L]{thmbox} \usepackage{eurosym} \usepackage{enumitem}               %pour modifer itemize et enumerate \usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb} \usepackage{mathrsfs}               %pour utiliser mathscr \usepackage{array,multirow,makecell} \usepackage{fancyhdr}               %package pour modifier les en-têtes \usepackage{fancybox}               %pour boîtes spéciales \usepackage{tikz,tkz-tab,tkz-fct} \usepackage{tikz-dependency}        %permet de créer des schemas \usepackage{sectsty}                %permet de modifier les styles des sections (voir \sectionfont l.21) \usepackage{fourier-orns} \usepackage{shadethm}               %pour theoremes en gris \setcellgapes{1pt} \makegapedcells \newcolumntype{R}[1]{&gt;{\raggedleft\arraybackslash }b{#1}}   %pour redéfinir les colonnes dans tabular \newcolumntype{L}[1]{&gt;{\raggedright\arraybackslash }b{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{&gt;{\centering\arraybackslash }b{#1}} \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Roman{section}} %permet de changer la numérotation en chiffres romains des sections \newshadetheorem{defi}{Définition}  %crée un nouveau type de théorème \newshadetheorem{thm}{Théorème} \newshadetheorem{ppte}{Propriété} \sectionfont{\sectionrule{3ex}{3pt}{-1.5ex}{1pt}} %mettre un trait de séparation dans les sections (package sectsty) \pagestyle{fancy} %style en-têtes \lhead{} %en-tête gauche \chead{Lois à densité} %en-tête centrale \rhead{T\up{ale}} %en-tête droite \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}      \tkzInit[xmin=-4,xmax=4,ymax=1]      \tkzDrawX[label={},noticks]      %\tkzDrawY      \tkzFct[domain=-2:2]{exp(-x**2)}      \tkzDrawArea[color=blue, domain = -0.5:1]      \tkzText(-1,0.75){$\mathscr{C}_{f}$} \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   But from now, it doesn't produce the result I would like as the surface start from the point (-0.5,f(-0.5)) and not as an integral from -0.5 to 1. This is a picture of the result :   Which is obviously not what I would like and this extends now to all my "old" docs which were "normal" before. I don't think I have done anything special except updating my Tex distribution ... If someone has an idea ?? How do I get $\cos{\theta} \lt \frac{\sin{\theta}}{\theta} \lt 1$? How do I update Custom Label's value using apex? Which one would be a better option metadata api or tooling api? Please provide example Finding the uniquely determined region of a PDE (a) Solve the equation $yu_x+xu_y=0$  with the condition $u(0,y) = e^{-y^2}$. (b) In which region of the xy plane is the solution uniquely determined?     I did the first part but I don't understand how to do part b.  I read   But I don't understand how the argument is based. A more clear explanation is appreciated Design Review: 3.3V Logic to 12V Logic (Uni-directional and Bi-directional) I'm looking for feedback and improvements on my design below. Specific questions are at the end. I created this as an attempt to answer my own, . From my feedback there, it seems like I needed to be more clear in my requirements. These are screenshots from Eagle. If there's a better way to share, please let me know so I can correct it. Entire board  The overall purpose of this board is to translate between 12V logic, and 3.3V logic. The top portion of the board represents the 12V side. The LEDs are placeholders to indicate whether the 12V signal is HIGH or LOW. In practice, these would be replaced with more , requiring up to 3A. The switches are also placeholders, allowing one to manually turn the 12V signal on and off. They are only for test purposes, the &quot;real&quot; 12V signal would be coming as the output from other relays. The bottom half is the 3.3V side. This will be connected to a  (BBB). The board will connect to 2 output GPIO pins and 2 input GPIO pins of the BBB. Overall, I want to translate the 3.3V I/O from the BBB to the 12V signals on the other side (to control more relays and read their signals). I have designed 3 modules to control both directions individually, and together. 3V3_TO_12V Module  This module converts the 3.3V GPIO output from the BBB to a 12V signal on the other side. When the 3.3V signal is low, the 12V signal is low. When the 3.3V signal is high, the 12V signal is high. To do this, the 3.3V GPIO output is connect to a , which turns a  relay on and off. This switches the 12V power as output of the module to be used elsewhere. 12V_TO_3V3 Module  This module converts a 12V signal to 3.3V signal, to be read by a GPIO input from the BBB on the other side. When the 12V signal is low, the 3.3V signal is low. When the 12V signal is high, the 3.3V signal is high. To do this, the 12V signal simply turns a  relay on and off. This switches the 3.3V power to be read as input by the BBB. DUAL_12V↔3V3 Module  This module combines the previous two modules to create a bidirectional translation. If the 12V side is high, the 3.3V input to the BBB GPIO should be high. If the 3.3V output from the BBB GPIO is high, then the 12V side should be high too. It's similar to a logical OR, if either side is high, the corresponding signal on the other side should be high too. A single 12V signal has to be split into individual input and output signals on the 3.3V side for the BBB. Questions  Is the  and  relay combination overkill for having the BBB GPIO output control the 12V power line? I like the isolation and safety it provides, but it seems too much (in terms of cost and board space) Is there a better solution for the 12V to 3.3V conversion. I like the simplicity of the  relay switching a 3.3V signal, but it takes up lots of room. Does the DUAL_12V↔3V3 Module (which combines each translation direction) even make sense? This seems wasteful to use 2 relays and a high side driver, but I haven't found simpler solution that achieves the same result. Should I add pulldown resistors for the BBB GPIO inputs, or are the internal pulldown resistors good enough?  Any other feedback is welcome. I'm new to electronic design. How to pretty print XML from Java? I have a Java String that contains XML, with no line feeds or indentations. I would like to turn it into a String with nicely formatted XML. How do I do this?  String unformattedXml = "&lt;tag&gt;&lt;nested&gt;hello&lt;/nested&gt;&lt;/tag&gt;"; String formattedXml = new [UnknownClass]().format(unformattedXml);   Note: My input is a String. My output is a String.   (Basic) mock result:    &lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt; &lt;root&gt;   &lt;tag&gt;     &lt;nested&gt;hello&lt;/nested&gt;   &lt;/tag&gt; &lt;/root&gt; What constitutes an observation/measurement in QM? asp.net mvc put controllers into a separate project Loading multiple CSV files into QGIS 2.10 How can I load multiple CSV files into QGIS with Longitude/Latitude already included in it. I downloaded the &quot;Load Them All&quot; plug-in, however, the result loaded was converted as text files and cannot be visualize on the map canvass. Any help? Are there any available plug-ins that can load multiple CSV file that will work fine in QGIS? Endpoint of a line knowing slope, start and distance In a Cartesian system, I've got the slope, start point and distance of a line segment.  What's the formula to find the endpoint? Understanding of the theorem that all norms are equivalent in finite dimensional vector spaces The following is a well-known result in functional analysis:     If the vector space $X$ is finite dimensional, all norms are equivalent.     Here is the standard proof in one textbook. First, pick a norm for $X$, say  $$\|x\|_1=\sum_{i=1}^n|\alpha_i|$$ where $x=\sum_{i=1}^n\alpha_ix_i$, and $(x_i)_{i=1}^n$ is a basis for $X$. Then show that every norm for $X$ is equivalent to $\|\cdot\|_1$, i.e.,  $$c\|x\|\leq\|x\|_1\leq C\|x\|.$$ For the first inequality, one can easily get $c$ by triangle inequality for the norm. For the second inequality, instead of constructing $C$, the  is applied to construct a contradiction.   The strategies for proving these two inequalities are so different. Here is my question,      Can one prove this theorem without Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem?   UPDATE:     Is the converse of the theorem true? In other words, if all norms for a vector space $X$ are equivalent, then can one conclude that $X$ is of finite dimension? I've bought a  to use with my EOS 200D and while I love the wide aperture, it appears to be quite difficult to achieve sharp focus on people's faces when shooting at f/1.8. I've tried both using Dual Pixel focus in Live View and using the center focusing point in the viewfinder, but it doesn't get me perfect results.  Is this simply a characteristic of cheap wide-aperture lenses? Or is it impossible to get sharp focus with a fully open aperture?  When I'm at at home using a tripod and focusing on a still subject I do get good focus (so it's not a camera or lens issue). But it's hard to do with people who are slightly moving between shots. Keep processes alive after SSH logout Im trying to measure bandwidth, packet loss, latency and jitter between two computers on a wireless 802.11s mesh connection.   Im trying to make a (my first) bash script that can do the following:   SSH to another computer and start logging data from services (ptpd, tcpdump, iperf). Start the same processes on my own computer and start logging data. Once the iperf transmission on my own computer is finished, it should SSH into the remote computer and kill the the services.   The idea is for this these three steps run in a for-loop, that increases the package size transmitted by iperf for each iteration and logs the resulting data.  I know how to start a process on the remote pc by ssh host@adress process.  I am however clueless on how to start multiple processes through SSH and logout, since the processes are terminated once I logout. I have looked at the screen and nohup commands, but don't know how to use them in a script.  Thanks in advance!  EDIT:  Thanks for all the help so far.  I got nohup to work now, it was pretty simple as people pointed out.  So now I got: ssh host@adress nohup ./script.sh &gt; /dev/null 2&gt;&amp;1 &amp; in the script on my main pc. This starts a script on the remote pc just fine, and then logout of SSH. The next problem is how to execute the script on the remote pc as sudo, since this is needed by tcpdump.  Trying ssh host@adress **sudo** nohup ./script.sh &gt; /dev/null 2&gt;&amp;1 &amp; doesnt work.  Any ideas?  EDIT 2:  If anybody is stuck with the same problem, I found a guide how to solve this: How to remove the left part of a string? I have some simple python code that searches files for a string e.g. path=c:\path, where the c:\path part may vary. The current code is:  def find_path(i_file):     lines = open(i_file).readlines()     for line in lines:         if line.startswith("Path="):             return # what to do here in order to get line content after "Path=" ?   What is a simple way to get the text after Path=? Hi Blender coders and artists.  I am updating one of my add-ons for Blender 2.8 and have run into some  issues finding the appropriate way to hide a collection that is added to my scene.  I want to deselect the eyeball on the toolbar with a python command in a script but I don't want to disable the collection in the view-port entirely as it is used as a collection in a particle system.   I just want to deselect the eyeball circled in green below.  Anyone know the python API for this? Is there a way to avoid "+canned.response" in the email address using Gmail's canned response feature If I set up a filter and send it a canned response, Gmail appends +canned.response to my username in the reply.  For example, given the filter "from:foo@example.com to:me@example.com" set up to send a canned response, when foo@example.com sends me an email the canned response comes from me+canned.response@example.com instead of me@example.com, exposing that I'm using a canned response.  Is there a way to avoid this? What determines which frames are inertial frames? I understand that you can (in principle) measure whether "free particles" (no forces) experience accelerations in order to tell whether a frame is inertial. But fundamentally, what determines which frames are inertial (i.e. what principle selects in which frames free particles will not appear to accelerate)? I've been told that the cosmic microwaves determine the ultimate rest frame of the universe, but that doesn't make sense to me, since one can still ask why that frame is an inertial frame.  Also, I understand that there are no real inertial frames in general relativity, but it seems like there certainly exists approximate inertial frames and we can ask why those frames are approximately inertial and not others. For example, in the frame of a person riding a merry go round, free particles appear to greatly accelerate; while in the frame of someone standing next to the merry go round there are no such great accelerations. Why does the guy (or gal) on the merry go round see free particles accelerating while the other guy doesn't.   And if you're gonna tell me that it's "the rest of the stuff in the universe" that determines whether the person on the merry go round sees free particles accelerate, I'll ask how you know that all that stuff is not spinning.  I hope this question sort of makes sense, it's been bothering me for a while and my study of relativity (most of special relativity and just the outline of general relativity) hasn't really clarified it for me much.