Understanding raster size after clip?
Creating compressed GeoTIFF with QGIS Clipper tool?
Is password confirmation necessary on a Change Password dialog? On one hand there is no need to ask for password confirmation because it is annoying. If I made a mistake when confirming my password I'll need retype my very complex password again. There is also a button that can show/hide the password so I don't need retype it in order to confirm it.   However, some users don't use the password show/hide button and the 'forgotten password' option will be pain for them.  Twitter removed the password confirmation from registration but left the dual confirmation in place for changing password. Is this right approach? (This question is only as reference, I will add the answer myself)  Suddenly the search in the expl3 documentation interface3.pdf no longer works. As an example searching for "divis" gives this as the first hit:    In sumatra there is no problem, other files (e.g. source3.pdf) works fine. What could be the reason?) How does the 2009 Star Trek film mesh with Enterprise canon? All of the events in the 2009 Star Trek movie would have taken place after the adventures of Captain Johnathan Archer and company.  So, unless J.J. Abrams and friends decide to completely hand-wave that bit of history as well, all of the events in Enterprise should (in theory) still be able to line up with this new timeline.  Are there any points of conflict in this?  How about any time-travel episodes in the Enterprise series which may have happened differently after the interventions of Nero?  Are there possible good explanations for such conflicts, or are there some which are irreconcilable?  NOTE:  I'm not arguing here whether or not ST2k9 is a part of Star Trek canon.  In fact, this question is specifically granting that it is.  I just want to know if there's any conflicts between the new movie and the existing Star Trek history that remains applicable to it. Should it be obvious that independent quantum states are composed by taking the tensor product? Prove that the $\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)}h(x,y)$ Does not Exist using Polar Coordinates Let $h(x,y)=\frac{x^5y}{2x^{10}+y^2}$. How would I prove that the $\lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)}h(x,y)$ Does Not Exist?  I think that we might use polar coordinates, but I am not sure. I am trying to animate in 2d. I do it with planes that have textures on them. I recently came up with the idea of having a plane with an image sequence of mouths because animating actual lip syncing by hand takes too long and isn't really necessary for what I'm trying to acomplish. However, when playing back the animation in textured viewport shading the animated texture stays at the last frame until the animation stops. I can use the arrow keys and it works fine as well as scrubbing through the timeline, just not when playing back the animation with alt+a. Can anyone help me with this problem? Get steam to realize I have games already installed I uninstalled and re-installed steam. I didn't uninstall my games, and they still exist on my hard drive (I checked).  I have an SSD and a HDD, and to save space I install programs (including steam) to C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam drive (SSD) and games to D:\Games\SteamApps (HDD). How to I let steam know the programs are installed there? I'm looking for a bijection from the closed interval [0,1] to the real line. I have already thought of $\tan(x-\frac{\pi}{2})$ and $-\cot\pi x$, but these functions aren't defined on 0 and 1.   Does anyone know how to find such a function and/or if it even exists?   Thanks in advance! How to get old Mapping and Voronoi nodes into Blender 2.82? I noticed that some nodes changed significantly with Blender 2.81 and 2.82. Now I can't follow older tutorials, because some have different options than me.   Voronoi Node is totally different Mapping Node is missing it's maximum / minimum clipping controls   Q: How to get these older nodes back into Blender 2.82? Calculate the area on a sphere of the intersection of two spherical caps Given a sphere of radius $r$ with two spherical caps on it defined by the radii ($a_1$ and $a_2$) of the bases of the spherical caps, given a separation of the two spherical caps by angle $\theta$, how do you calculate the surface area of that intersection?   To clarify, the area is that of the curved surface on the sphere defined by the intersection. At the extreme where both $a_1,a_2 = r$, we would be describing a spherical lune.   Alternatively define the spherical caps by the angles  $\Phi_1 = \arcsin(a_1/r)$ and $\Phi_2 = \arcsin(a_2/r)$. Foobar2000-like music player? Find weak form of linear transport equation I am stuck on the following problem that says:       a) Find a weak formulation for the partial differential equation $${\partial u\over\partial t\ }+ c{\partial u \over \partial x\ }=0$$    b) Show that $u=f(x-ct)$ is a generalized solution of $${\partial u\over\partial t\ }+ c{\partial u \over \partial x\ }=0$$ for any distribution $f$    My Attempt:   I know that in order to find a weak form of a pde, we need to multiply it by a test function, then integrate it. Also, to find a generalized solution, we need to find a weak solution and just multiply it by the Heaviside function.  Let's take any test function $\phi $, then we have (integrating by parts second part of the integral) $$\int_{\Omega } ( {\partial u\over\partial t\ }+ c{\partial u \over \partial x\ })*\phi(x) dx= \int_{\Omega } {\partial u\over \partial t}\phi(x) dx - c\int_{\Omega } u(x,t)\phi'(x)dx$$ where $\phi $ vanishes at boundaries. So, is it the final form or can we proceed further? And how am I supposed to find a generalized solution?  Can someone help me out? Thanks in advance for your time. Reinstall Windows 8 on a Windows 8 based system with embedded key I'm a computer technician and we started selling few Windows 8 machine. We saw the new COA label does not show the key and after reading a little bit online, realized those systems came with the key emmebeded in the eUFI BIOS.   My question is : How do I reinstall Windows 8 if the hard drive is crashed? I kind of get that you can install it with a media and the media should activate the licence embedded. What is the media required? Is a retail DVD is able to do the work or do I need a system builder kit? I understand the manufacturer is reponsible to provide media  or replace the failed drive under the warranty but what will happen when warranty expire? I'll have to sell a full windows 8 licence with a key?  Thanks How can I get apt to use a mirror close to me, or choose a faster mirror? Downloading from the main Ubuntu archive is slow even when it's not release day, how can I get apt-get to automatically use a mirror that is close to me? inequality on the unit disk $n$ points $z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_n$ in the unit open disk are given. Prove or disprove that there exists $z$ in the unit circle such that $\prod_{i=1}^n |z-z_i|^i \ge 1$.  I think it can be solved by elementary analytic methods but no idea. Are there any good tools besides SeleniumRC that can fetch webpages including content post-painted by JavaScript? How to make equally sized windows in corners of the screen? Curve Bevel function, scale? Baby Rudin claim: $1+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{7}-\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{9}+\frac{1}{11}-\frac{1}{6}...$ converges This sequence is a rearrangement of the series $1-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{5}...$. Note that at this point in the text we do not have any theorem about the convergence of rearrangements.  Let $\{s_n\}$ be the sequence of partials sums of the series then for $n \ge 0$  $s_{3(n+1)} = \sum ^n _ {k=0} \frac{1}{4k+1} + \frac{1}{4k+3} - \frac{2}{4k+4}$  We can view it as the sequence(on $n$) of partials sums of  $\sum_0 a_n = \sum_0 \frac{1}{4n+1} + \frac{1}{4n+3} - \frac{2}{4n+4}$  Where $|a_n| = a_n = \frac{1}{4n+4}\{\frac{3}{4n+1}+\frac{1}{4n+3}\} \le \frac{1}{4n^2}$.  By the comparison test $s_{3(n+1)}$ converges to some real $\alpha$.  But $s_{3(n+1)+1} = s_{3(n+1)}+ \frac{1}{4n+5}$ and $s_{3(n+1)+2} = s_{3(n+1)}+ \frac{1}{4n+5}+\frac{1}{4n+7} $hence we have a partition of $\{s_n\}$ into subsequences which tend to $\alpha$ and this implies $s_n \rightarrow \alpha$.  Is my proof correct? Any alternative solutions are appreciated. Converse of Schur's Lemma in finite dimensional vector spaces I am trying to prove (or disprove) the converse of Schur's Lemma in finite dimensional vector spaces. I am not sure if it holds in this case, but I have tried to apply the idea that proves it in representation theory (see for example Theorem 4.3  that uses Maschke's theorem or in questions  and ).  The converse of Schur's Lemma in finite dimensional vector spaces is:     Let $V$ be a finite dimensional vector space over the complex numbers. Let $S$ be a set of endomorphisms of $V$ and assume that every endomorphism $A$ of $V$ such that $$AB=BA\text{ for all }B\in S$$ is of the form $\lambda I, \ \lambda\in\mathbb{C}$. Then $V$ is a simple $S$-space.   (*an endomorphism of $V$ is a linear operator from $V$ to $V$  *$V$ is a simple $S$-space if the only $S$-invariant subspaces of $V$ are $V$ itself and the zero subspace)  What I've tried so far:  Assume to the contrary that $V$ is not a simple $S-$space. Then, there exists a subspace $W$ of $V$ such that $W\not =\{0\}$, $W\not= V$ and $W$ is $S$-invariant. Let $W'=V\setminus W$. Then, since $V$ is finite, we can easily prove that $V=W\oplus W'$ (this is my attempt to translate Maschke's theorem in vector spaces). Consequently, for every $v\in V$, there exists unique $w\in W$ and $w'\in W'$, such that $v=w+w'$. Define the projection $P:V\rightarrow V$ by $Pv=w$ for every $v\in V$.   What is left to prove is that $PB=BP$ for all $B\in S$. Then $P$ is clearly not a scalar and thus we have the contradiction we are looking for.  There is a difficulty in showing that $PB=BP$ for all $B\in S$, because $W'$ might be $S$-invariant or not. More precisely:   Let $v\in V=W\oplus W'$ and $v\not =0_V$.  If $v\in W$ then $Bv\in W$ because $W$ is $S$-invariant, therefore: $PBv=Bv$ and $BPv=Bv$.  If $v\in W'$ then $Pv=0$, hence $BPv=B\cdot 0=0$, and  (i) if $Bv\in W'$ then $PBv=0$.  (ii) if $Bv\in W$ then $PBv=Bv$ and this is where the problem occurs.  Any hints, ideas or counterexamples would be very helpful.