Examples of disconnected metric spaces that cannot be isometrically embedded into a connected metric space
Is every metric space a subspace of some connected metric space?
C++ single template specialisation with multiple template parameters What is the difference between shell, console, and terminal? What the pointer size in 64 bits computer in C++? Mark questions to receive notifications and updates? Why is.vector on a data-frame doesn't return TRUE? Suppose $f$ is a continuous, strictly increasing function defined on a closed interval $[a,b]$ such that $f^{-1}$ is the inverse function of $f$. Prove that,   $$\int_{a}^bf(x)dx+\int_{f(a)}^{f(b)}f^{-1}(x)dx=bf(b)-af(a)$$   A high school student or a Calculus first year student will simply, possibly, apply change of variable technique, then integration by parts and he/she will arrive at the answer without giving much thought into the process. A smarter student would probably compare the integrals with areas and conclude that the equality is immediate.  However, I am an undergrad student of Analysis and I would want to solve the problem "carefully". That is, I wouldn't want to forget my definitions, and the conditions of each technique. For example, while applying change of variables technique, I cannot apply it blindly; I must be prudent enough to realize that the criterion to apply it includes continuous differentiability of a function. Simply with $f$ continuous, I cannot apply change of variables technique.  Is there any method to solve this problem rigorously? One may apply the techniques of integration (by parts, change of variables, etc.) only after proper justification.  The reason I am not adding any work of mine is simply that I could not proceed even one line since I am not given $f$ is differentiable. However, this seems to hold for non-differentiable functions also.  I would really want some help. Pictorial proofs and/or area arguments are invalid. How can I calculate this limit: $\lim\limits_{x\to 0} x\left\lfloor\frac{1}{x}\right\rfloor$? Calculate the following limit. $$ \lim_{x\to 0} x\left\lfloor\frac{1}{x}\right\rfloor $$ Where $\left\lfloor x \right\rfloor$ represents greatest integer function or floor function, i.e greatest integer less than or equal to $x$.  Thanks. My non-native English speaking friend just asked me: "Data is..." or "Data are..."?  I said both but that's because I've been desensitized from reading/writing both (especially from writing code and adding quick comments).  My question: Is it acceptable to utilize either for a university paper? Or is one safer than the other (when confronted with stickler professors)?    Related questions: Graduate school admission with a degree in a different field Can I be admitted to graduate school in a different field from my degree?  Specific cases include:   If I've taken plenty of advanced courses in field X in the process of completing a degree in another field, can I apply to graduate school in X? What if I haven't taken many courses in X, but I have acquired a good grasp of X through self-study or working in a related field? What if I've never studied X, but I have done very well in an unrelated field?  Could I be admitted to graduate school in X on the basis of general intellectual promise, and then make up the missing background after enrollment?   Note that this question is an attempt to provide a comprehensive answer, to avoid the need for a profusion of field-specific questions on this topic (see the associated ). Please feel free to edit the question or answer to improve them. If a derivative of a continuous function has a limit, must it agree with that limit? Suppose we have a continuous function $f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$. Suppose also that for a certain point $c$, $\lim_{x \to c} f'(x)$ exists. Must $f'(c)$ exist as well, and be equal to this limit?  This isn't quite the same as asking if derivatives are always continuous. The well-known function $f(x) = x^2 \sin (1/x)$ is continuous and differentiable everywhere, but its derivative has no limit at $x = 0$. I'm wondering if the derivative of a continuous function can have a discontinuity where its limit does exist. If $R$ is a local ring and $M$ and $N$ are finitely generated $R$-modules such that $M\otimes N=0$ then how does it follow from Nakayama's lemma that either $M=0$ or $N=0$?    This is an exercise in Atiyah and Macdonald. The part I could not show in the hints is $({M{\otimes}_R N)}_{k}=0$ implies $M_{k}{\otimes }_{k} N_{k}=0$, where $k=R/\mathfrak m$ and $\mathfrak m$ is the maximal ideal of $R$. Joel Spolsky asked what rhymes with orange. The official answer is, "Nothing," although a creative poet can get close by using half words, just the -nge part or resorting to place names and foreign words.  Does orange somehow violate the basic phonotactics of English? (And hence we wouldn't expect other English words to rhyme with it?) How to show that the nth power of a $n \times n$ nilpotent matrix equals to zero $A^n=0$ Why does observation collapse the wave function? In one of the first lectures on QM we are always taught about Young's experiment and how particles behave either as waves or as particles depending on whether or not they are being observed. I want to know what about observation causes this change? What is the terminal's graphic API? How can certain programs set background and font colors, write characters to the same location on screen (e.g. to the third row, fifth column) more than once?  Some examples are the progress bar displayed by curl google.com &gt; a, some installation screens and nearly any text editor. Significance of assumption in competition inequality questions Refer to the problem below (IMO 2009 Shortlist)     Let $a, b, c$ be positive real numbers such that $$\frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{c} = a + b+ c$$   Prove that    $$\frac{1}{(2a+b+c)^2} + \frac{1}{(2a+b+c)^2} + \frac{1}{(2a+b+c)^2} \leqslant \frac{3}{16} $$    In the solution given by the  (Pg 16), it states that      Without loss of generality, we choose $$a +b+c = 1$$.    Thus, the problem becomes    $$ \frac{1}{(1 + a)^2} + \frac{1}{(1 + b)^2} +\frac{1}{(1 + b)^2} \leqslant \frac{3}{16}(\frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{c})$$    Applying Jensen’s inequality to the function $$f(x) = \frac{x}{ (1+ x)^2}$$   ,which is concave for $0 ≤ x ≤ 2$   and increasing for $0 ≤ x ≤ 1$, we obtain   $$α \frac{a}{(1 + a)^2} + β \frac{b}{(1 + b)^2} + γ \frac{c}{(1 + c)^2} \leqslant (α + β + γ) \frac{A}{(1 + A)^2}$$   , where $A =\frac{αa + βb + γc}{α + β + γ}.$   Choosing $α = \frac{1}{a} , β =\frac{1}{b},$ and  $γ = \frac{1}{c}$   , we can apply the harmonic-arithmetic-mean inequality   $$A =\frac{3}{\frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{c}} ≤ \frac{a + b + c }{3} = \frac{1}{3} &lt; 1$$   Finally we prove:   $$ \frac{1}{(1 + a)^2} + \frac{1}{(1 + b)^2} +\frac{1}{(1 + b)^2} \leqslant ( \frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{c}) \frac{A}{(1 + A)^2} \leqslant ( \frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{c})\frac{A}{(1 + \frac{1}{3})^2} = \frac{3}{16}(\frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{c}) $$   However,  (Pg 4) differs by having $a +b+c=3$ and setting $f(x) = \frac{1}{16x} - \frac{1}{(x+3)^2}$ and allowing Jensen to resolve the rest.   The questions are as follows;   How do you choose before hand which $a + b+ c =$ to choose?  Why particularly does the assumption differ between the 2 solutions? How does one know before hand the choosing of $α = \frac{1}{a} , β =\frac{1}{b},$ and  $γ = \frac{1}{c}$?  Where and how did $A =\frac{αa + βb + γc}{α + β + γ}$ come from?   Any help would be much appreciated. From what I understand, the frequency of light coming from the source moving towards an observer increases. From $ E=hv $ , this implies increase in energy of photon.  What really is confusing, is where does that extra energy come from? And also where is the energy is lost during opposite Doppler effect (red shift)? Why doesn't this violate the conservation of energy? Movie with "Where do the tubes go?" I'm trying to find a movie with an underground facility with people wearing white suits. The people have been affected such that they show no curiosity. There is one person that does and asks one of his co-workers where a tube leads to.      At the end there is an uprising where everyone gets to see the surface and sunlight.   What is the name of this movie? Solution check: Let $f_n$ be fibonacci numbers. Prove: $\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \binom{n+k}{2k+1} = f_{2n-1}$ and $\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n+k}{2k} = f_{2n}$ Freeman and Tukey interval If $Y$ is Poisson$(\lambda)$ distributed, how do we obtain this confidence interval for $\lambda$:  $$ \left (\frac{(\sqrt Y+\sqrt{Y + 1}-z_{(α⁄2)} )^2 - 1}{4},\  \frac{(\sqrt Y+\sqrt{Y  +1}+z_{(α⁄2)} )^2 - 1}{4} \right ) $$