The correct placement of "only"
Correct position of "only"
What would happen if you put your hand in front of the 7 TeV beam at LHC? Some speculation here:   Is there a possibility it would pass 'undetected' through your hand, or is it certain death?  Can you conclude it to be vital, or only loose your hand?  Would it simply make a small cylindrical hole through your hand, or is there some sort of explosion-effect?  Assume your hand has a cross section of 50cm², and a thickness of 2cm, how much of the beam's energy would be transferred to your hand? I want to set a folder such that anything created within it (directories, files) inherit default permissions and group.    Lets call the group "media".  And also, the folders/files created within the directory should have g+rw automatically. Caption on tabular environment I have got codes like the following (generated by Kile). How can I add a caption. I guess I should have used the table environment. Is there any solution now?  \newcommand{\mc}[3]{\multicolumn{#1}{#2}{#3}} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{rccll}      &amp;   &amp; \mc{3}{c}{Colin}\\      &amp;   &amp; a &amp; \mc{1}{c}{b} &amp; \mc{1}{c}{c}\\\cline{3-5} Rose &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{A} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(1,2)} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(2,5)} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(4,4)}\\\cline{3-5}      &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{B} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(7,4)} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(3,5)} &amp; \mc{1}{c|}{(0,6)}\\\cline{3-5} \end{tabular} \end{center} Sorting multiple keys with Unix sort Solve recurrence relation $a_n = 3 a_{n - 3} + a_{n-1} + 2 n$ I am not able to solve the above recurrence relation which involves $n$. The initial conditions $a_0 = 1, a_1 = 2, a_2 = 3$, for $n \geq 0$. Please try to give closed form in terms of arbitrary $a_i \geq 1 $ for $i \geq 0$ Do cards with abilities that target trigger heroic? I'm trying to split text in a JTextArea using a regex to split the String by \n However, this does not work and I also tried by \r\n|\r|n and many other combination of regexes. Code:  public void insertUpdate(DocumentEvent e) {     String split[], docStr = null;     Document textAreaDoc = (Document)e.getDocument();      try {         docStr = textAreaDoc.getText(textAreaDoc.getStartPosition().getOffset(), textAreaDoc.getEndPosition().getOffset());     } catch (BadLocationException e1) {         // TODO Auto-generated catch block         e1.printStackTrace();     }      split = docStr.split("\\n"); } Can't boot into Ubuntu in Windows 10 / Ubuntu dual boot I installed Ubuntu on a Dell XPS 13 laptop that had Windows 10 preinstalled on it. I installed it from a USB flash drive on a partition. When I boot my computer I can only boot into Windows 10 and Ubuntu is nowhere to be seen.  If I boot into my USB then I can see that Ubuntu is installed, but I can't get to it from the BIOS boot menu. This is a variation of the  questioned some time ago.  For a complex Hilbert space $H$ let $T: H \rightarrow H$ be a bounded operator. We call that $T$ is a trace-class operator if the following sum  $$\sum_{i}{\langle |T|e_{i}, e_{i} \rangle} &lt; \infty$$  converges, where $|T| = (T T^{*})^{\frac{1}{2}}$ is the absolute value of the operator.  Assume that  $$\sum_{i}{\langle Te_{i}, e_{i} \rangle}$$  converges for any basis in the space $H$. How to prove that if the aformentioned property holds then the operator is a trace class operator?  The progress on the problem is the following: Given an arbitrary bounded operator $T: H \rightarrow H$, one can use the following decomposition $$T = \big( \frac{T + T^{*}}{2} \big) ^{*} + i \big( \frac{T^{*} - T}{2i} \big) ^{*}$$  The latter line gives the decomposition $$T = A + i B$$ where $A, B$ are normal operators.  For the normal operators we can apply the spectral theorem that proposes that $T$ is unitary equivalent to  $$(UT U^{-1})(f(x)) = g(x) f(x)$$  where  $$U: H \rightarrow L^{2}(X, \mu)$$ $$g \in L^{\infty}(X, \mu)$$  Though this decomposition classify the operator in a broad sence, i see no direct way to conclude the statement. Are the any hints that may extend the previous argument? If not, are there any ways to conclude the statement? Why would Antimatter behave differently via Gravity? Is it possible to experimentally show that observable universe is much larger than ~93B ly? I'm having trouble understanding the simple "planetary" model of the atom that I'm being taught in my basic chemistry course.   In particular,    I can't see how a negatively charged electron can stay in "orbit" around a positively charged nucleus. Even if the electron actually orbits the nucleus, wouldn't that orbit eventually decay?  I can't reconcile the rapidly moving electrons required by the planetary model with the way atoms are described as forming bonds. If electrons are zooming around in orbits, how do they suddenly "stop" to form bonds.     I understand that certain aspects of quantum mechanics  to address these problems, and that there are  of atoms. My question here is whether the planetary model itself addresses these concerns in some way (that I'm missing) and whether I'm right to be uncomfortable with it. I'm trying to get apache to redirect from http to https, however I want them both on the same port (20100, but I doubt that will matter). Basically what's going on  except I'm not doing this for webmin. Currently I have it configured to serve HTTPS, and when I access with HTTP I get:  Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand. Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server port. Instead use the HTTPS scheme to access this URL, please.   There seem to be a lot of somewhat similar questions, however I am unable to find one that actually answers my question. I want the QED symbol to be 1 line lower at the end of proof How can I stop Nautilus from dereferencing symlinks? I use symbolic links to tidy my home folder. This works well in the terminal, since the links create the illusion of normal folders:    In Nautilus, however, the links behave more like , immediately teleporting me to their target:    This is particularly troubling when¹ I later want to navigate "up" to the parent folder, as it strands me somewhere outside of the tree I've carefully tidied.  How can I make Nautilus show symbolic links as normal folders, like the terminal does?  Details   Nautilus did not dereference symlinks in Ubuntu 12.10:   Maybe this new behavior is just a bug? I'm not sure how to tell. Here's what I know:   It's not on the . I've skimmed the  and didn't see anything related. The Nautilus mailing list archive . I received no response from about 120 idlers when posing the question on the GNOME IRC channel. A change was made in Nautilus 3.6 to .  ¹ This is an example. A workaround for this particular scenario does not constitute an answer to my question. Since people seem to be interested in discussing it, though:   Using the Back button is not a suitable workaround; it does not always take me to the parent folder. You can navigate up by pressing Alt+Up. The desired behavior in this example is for "up" to navigate to the parent folder of the symbolic link. The current behavior is to navigate to the parent folder of the target of the symbolic link. According to      there         adverb          in or at that place (opposed to here ):      She is there now.         pronoun          (used to introduce a sentence or clause in which the verb comes before its subject or has no complement):      There is no hope.   Then, what element is there in:     There is the man.   I'm confused because "There is the man" is an adverb inversion, in which there is an adverb and "the man is" is inverted. But according to the definition above, there suddenly becomes a pronoun. How do I tell if a regular file does not exist in Bash? When in a browser (Chrome or Safari), the following keyboard shortcut will always bring up a window that says "Welcome To Mail":  Command+Shift+I  I would like to use this shortcut for another purpose.  Is there any way to disable this shortcut? Is Argothian Elder a Druid? is listed on a lot of websites with the Druid creature type, but the card only lists "Elf".  Is Argothian Elder a Druid too? Finding a tricky limit I have a homework in real analysis and I'm very confused about it. I would be very thankful, if you could give me any ideas or solutions how to get this task done. The task is as follows:     Find the limit:   $$\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{1}{x} \int_{0}^{x} (1+ \sin(t))^{1/t} dt.$$   A hint that has been given is to use L'Hospital's Rule. Moreover, it must be substantiated why we can use L'Hospital' Rule in this situation. It is also important to mention that $(1 + \sin(t))$ has a removable point of discontinuity at $0$ and therefore the integral can be interpreted as a Riemann integral.