Why Ubuntu appears in boot options after I uninstall it?
How do I remove "Ubuntu" in the bios boot menu? (UEFI)
how much money it takes for a day without including accommodation In Uk In my textbook, a relationship is plotted between the resistance of the material and the temperature, and the temperature coefficient is defined as the slope of that graph divided by an arbitrary resistance $R_1$ on the graph. Does that mean that the coefficient varies depending on the temperature I choose to divide the slope by?  If so, how does it stand as a valid reference to the material’s resistance growth rate with temperature?  If not, then where did I go wrong with this train of thought? Is it somehow possible that I can extend the link to something which I produce by using \ref with a label by the word standing before \ref? If I write something like that: For further information, have a look into chapter \ref{chap:abc} and figure \ref{fig:def}  then the only thing being &quot;clickable&quot; are the chapter number and the figure number. Is it somehow possible to make the words &quot;chapter&quot; and &quot;figure&quot; being linked to those objects as well? Sudo is also user login password - why? how to change? When installing Ubuntu I can create a user with an encrypted folder, what I always do. Now after the installation the login password for this user is also the sudo password. Is that how it should be? I actually would like to have a different user login and sudo password, does is make sense? Should I do that, how? Computing Galois Group of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}):\mathbb{Q}$ Galois Group of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}):\mathbb{Q}$ is cumbersome to computing. Is easy to find the all four possible candidates but is cumberstone to show that they are automorphisms:  For multiplication is too long showing that  $f((a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})(a'+b'\sqrt{2}+c'\sqrt{3}+d'\sqrt{6}))=f(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})f(a'+b'\sqrt{2}+c'\sqrt{3}+d'\sqrt{6})$  For some non trivial candidate since the left hand side expands in $16$ terms. What about $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3},\sqrt{5}):\mathbb{Q}$? there are $7$ non trivial candidates and multiplication expands in $64$ terms!   How to do it in a tricker form?  Edit(Let me be more precise in my question):   I know that if $f\in\Gamma(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}):\mathbb{Q})$, then $f(\sqrt{2})=\pm\sqrt{2}$, $f(\sqrt{3})=\pm\sqrt{3}$ so there are $4$ candidates for $\mathbb{Q}$-Automorphisms. Candidates are given by:  $f_1(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})=a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6}$  $f_2(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})=a-b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}-d\sqrt{6}$  $f_3(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})=a+b\sqrt{2}-c\sqrt{3}-d\sqrt{6}$  $f_4(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6})=a-b\sqrt{2}-c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6}$  But I need to check that they are $\mathbb{Q}$-Automorphisms in $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$. All candidates $f_i$ fixes $\mathbb{Q}$ and is obvious that all preserves sums, $f_1$ obviously preserves product also since is the identity, but is cumberstone to show that $f_i(xy)=f_i(x)_if(y)$ to conclude $f_i\in\Gamma(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}):\mathbb{Q})$. Reputation changes not visible in the achievement box (again) Just like , which was marked as . But today, it's not working again. I'm still notified of new badges:      Update: it looks like new events are now updated; reputation events from earlier this UTC afternoon are still missing: I am a mathematics student with a hobby interest in physics. This means that I've taken graduate courses in quantum dynamics and general relativity without the bulk of undergraduate physics courses and sheer volume of education into the physical tools and mindset that the other students who took the course had, like Noether's theorem, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, statistical methods, and so on.  The courses themselves went well enough. My mathematical experience more or less made up for a lacking physical understanding. However, I still haven't found an elementary explanation of gauge invariance (if there is such a thing). I am aware of some examples, like how the magnetic potential is unique only up to a (time-)constant gradient. I also came across it in linearised general relativity, where there are several different perturbations to the spacetime metric that give the same observable dynamics.  However, to really understand what's going on, I like to have simpler examples. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find any. I guess, since "gauge invariance" is such a frightening phrase, no one use that word when writing to a high school student.  So, my (very simple) question is: In many high school physics calculations, you measure or calculate time, distance, potential energy, temperature, and other quantities. These calculations very often depend only on the difference between two values, not the concrete values themselves. You are therefore free to choose a zero to your liking. Is this an example of gauge invariance in the same sense as the graduate examples above? Or are these two different concepts? Detach (move) subdirectory into separate Git repository I have a  repository which contains a number of subdirectories. Now I have found that one of the subdirectories is unrelated to the other and should be detached to a separate repository.  How can I do this while keeping the history of the files within the subdirectory?  I guess I could make a clone and remove the unwanted parts of each clone, but I suppose this would give me the complete tree when checking out an older revision etc. This might be acceptable, but I would prefer to be able to pretend that the two repositories doesn't have a shared history.  Just to make it clear, I have the following structure:  XYZ/     .git/     XY1/     ABC/     XY2/   But I would like this instead:  XYZ/     .git/     XY1/     XY2/ ABC/     .git/     ABC/ How to cite own unpublished work in text and reference? I would like to cite one of my own unpublished work (under review). Is it okay to cite as following?  In text According to author et al. (year of submission)................. In reference authors list, year of submission, title, name of the Journal (status)   How about the results?   How will the reviewer access those results cited here?   Is it okay to provide them as supplements?   If I provide couple of figures as supplements, whether it will violate the copyright of the under reviewed paper? What order should Asimov's Foundation series be read in? Getting key with maximum value in dictionary? Can the weak force create a bound state? The height of a string in a gravitational field in 2-dimensions is bounded by $h(x_0)=h(x_l)=0$ (nails in the wall)  and also $\int_0^l ds= l$. ($h(0)=h(l)=0$, if you take $h$ as a function of arc length) .  What shape does it take?  My try so far: minimise potential energy of the whole string,  $$J(x,h, \dot{h})=\int_0^l gh(x) \rho \frac{ds}{l}=\frac{g \rho }{l}\int_0^l h(x) \sqrt{1+\dot{h}^2} dx$$  With the constraint  $$\int_0^l \sqrt{1+\dot{h}^2} dx- l=0$$ If it helps, it's evident that $\dot{h}(\frac{l}{2})=0$.  Generally, this kind of equation is a case of a constrained variational problem, meaning that the integrand in  $$\int_0^l \frac{g \rho }{l}h(x) \sqrt{1+\dot{h}^2} +\lambda(\int_0^l \sqrt{1+\dot{h}^2} dx- l)dx$$  Must satisfy the Euler Lagrange equation. The constraint must also be satisfied.  But, in truth, by this point I am clueless. $\lambda$ is worked through $\nabla J  = \lambda \nabla(\int_0^l \sqrt{1+\dot{h}^2} dx- l)$. I have tried this , but get nonsensical answers.  Is this method the best? If so, in what ways am I going about it wrongly thusfar? Seasonal Loan Amortization Conjunction Puzzle: Is this clause dependent or independent? Third grade teacher here. I plan to teach students to distinguish between simple, compound and complex sentences — but only if I can demonstrate a clear and meaningful difference between the latter two!  Complex or Compound? Each sentence in the following pairs is similar to its partner.   All dogs are mammals, so huskies are mammals. All dogs are mammals, therefore huskies are mammals. I come bearing soup, for Kate is sick. I come bearing soup, because Kate is sick.   Are the sentences above complex or compound?   First, we need to decide whether each italicized clause is independent or dependent. To me, they all look dependent. If that is the case, there's not much need to teach about compound sentences. Is there a meaningful difference between the sentences in each pair that I am missing? (Are the FANBOYS as special as they'd like to think?) Identify a short story about post-apocalyptic household robots Media: Short story collection When I read it: 2011 but the story itself was much older (unsure how much) so this information only serves to clarify that it is by no means new. Plot summary: A futuristic home with household robots that help around the house (cooking, cleaning etc.), we learn about their routines and behaviour and later on it's revealed that nobody is home, in fact everyone is dead, and a description of the outside seems to imply post-nuclear apocalypse. Setting: I seem to remember snow or winter What it isn't: with Google I stumbled upon  by Ray Bradbury, and  is very similar, and the beginning made me think "Bingo!", but I do not remember there being a fire in the story I read, and I also remember a view from a briefly opened door, or window, of a snowy setting, so while it may be that I am confusing elements of another story, or my imagination, with There Will Come Soft Rains, I would still like to run this through here as a question, because I'm not convinced. Additional info: The short story collection had other short stories that I will include as I remember them, details will be fuzzy:   Meteor, by John Wyndham , by Charlotte Perkins Gilman A short story about a man who is driving a car and it is revealed in the end that he was dead the whole time , by Charles Dickens A real $2 \times 2 $ matrix $M$ such that $$M^2 =  \begin{pmatrix} -1&amp;0 \\ 0&amp;-1-\epsilon  \\   \end{pmatrix}$$ (a) exists for all $\epsilon &gt; 0$. (b) does not exist for any $\epsilon &gt; 0$. (c) exists for some $\epsilon &gt; 0$. (d) None of the above is true.  Attempt: I couldn't think of any theory base to prove / disprove the existence of such a matrix. Could someone please give me a hint on how to go about this problem? Thank you very much for your help in this regard. What happens when my aasimar Celestial warlock has overlapping class and racial features? If you are an Aasimar warlock whose otherworldly patron is The Celestial, you will know the light cantrip from both race and class. Additionally, once you reach 6th level in warlock you will have resistance to radiant damage from both race and class.  Is there any ruling on what happens when you have overlapping class and race features? Can you enter the Schengen area with a UK visa? I'm a UK passport holder; my wife isn't. We don't live in UK. If she gets a UK visit visa, does this entitle her to travel to the Schengen area or do I need to get her a separate Schengen visa? How does the new Tie-Breaker work? In Clash of Clans there was an update on 9/16 adding a Tie-breaker into the wars, can anybody explain in detail how this mechanism works?