Would moving some of my blog posts from under an existing category to a new SUBcategory have a negative impact from an SEO POV?
Will moving blog posts from under an existing category to a new SUBcategory have a negative impact from an SEO POV?
Automatically rename files when they are placed in a specific directory Is it possible to automatically rename a file when it's placed in a specific directory?  For example I have a directory named "dir0".I move or copy a file named "file1" to "dir0".then "file1" should rename to "file1_{current timestamp}" It seems that I'm missing something about this.  First of all, the series is convergent: $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{2^{-n-1} (n+1)^2}{2^{-n} n^2}=\frac{1}{2}$ (ratio test)  What I tried to do is to find a limit of a partial sum $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}S_n$ as follows: $S_n=\frac{\frac{1}{6} n (n+1) (2 n+1)}{\frac{1-\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^n}{2 \left(1-\frac{1}{2}\right)}}$. Still, the limit is $\infty$ and I'm clearly doing something wrong. Class method differences in Python: bound, unbound and static What is the difference between the following class methods?  Is it that one is static and the other is not?  class Test(object):   def method_one(self):     print "Called method_one"    def method_two():     print "Called method_two"  a_test = Test() a_test.method_one() a_test.method_two() I was reading the following article by Mathew Might.  I saw the following the paragraph  What doesn't matter GPA? I don't care if it's 2.0 or 4.0. I won't even look at it. The school you went to? I'll judge you the same whether you went to Nowhere State U or a top-ten school. Transcripts? Never seen one. GREs? Irrelevant. Where you work/worked? Unless it's a research lab, it's not important. I don't think these items have much predictive capacity as to whether or not someone can complete a Ph.D.  Is Mathew Might telling the truth? For me it's very hard believe that GPA, GRE scores and undergraduate school don't matter. I used to think that they play an extremely important role in grad school admission. Editing Photoshop (PSD) files on Ubuntu? I was wondering that is it possible to edit PSD files on Ubuntu (like with Gimp). Actually, I need to edit layers. I haven't managed to do it. It would be nice if there is a chance! :) How do you prevent a user from posting data multiple times on a website Attempting official deploy process with single sandbox may reset/remove all existing work? I would like to add my bibliography to my presentation in IEEE format. What should I add to my preamble and code.  \documentclass{beamer} \setbeamertemplate{footline}[page number]  \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{booktabs} \begin{document} \section{Reference} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Reference}  \end{frame}   I'm using the same bibTex which I use to make the IEEE paper. GParted can't resize partition, but unallocated partition is available Pros and cons of rooting using apps ("Soft Root") compared to other methods ("Hard Root") There are quite a few app based rooting methods. A recent review , points to some of them and there may be more apps, paid or otherwise.  From what I understand,   Plus Points   Ease of rooting Don't need a laptop or computer   Minuses   Based on exploits, so may not work if exploits are denied by OS updates Difficulty in unrooting (as I see on some forums for my device Huawei Honor 6)   Questions:    What are the pros and cons apart from above?  If a device has both options - app based rooting and rooting by methods by developers, which one should I opt for?   Note: I am not seeking app suggestion or recommendation. I want to better understand why the construction something + [adjective] makes grammatical sense. Background: I was recently reading a Washington Post article and came across the following sentence.  So if you fall in that category, [the movie] feels more like magic than repetitive.  (Note: I've copied the relevant spoiler-free sentence above; following the link to the article will open you up to movie spoilers! ) The phrase more like magic than repetitive struck me as odd, presumably because it was non-parallel (more like [noun] than [adjective]). I would have expected &quot;...more like magic than something repetitive.&quot; (Actually, that needs to be rewritten to flow better, but the point is that at least it appears to be grammatical.) Thus, one would have the noun phrase &quot;something repetitive,&quot; of the form &quot;[noun] [adjective].&quot; This got me to thinking about the use of adjectives after nouns. There is a great Stack Exchange article  that involves the characteristics of the adjective that indicate it should come after the noun. But I haven't been able to find examples of how the word &quot;something&quot; requires a postponed adjective. Consider the following sentences:  I want to buy something red. I am looking for something sweet to eat.  You cannot say:  *I want to buy red something. *I am looking for sweet something to eat.  But you can say:  I want to buy something (that is) red. I am looking for something (that is) sweet to eat.  So, my question:  Do the above examples mean that the &quot;something [adjective]&quot; construction is an example of the ellipsis of &quot;that is&quot;?  Is there something special about the word &quot;something&quot; that requires the postponed adjective? Note that I am NOT looking for details about adjectives that are postponed; I'm interested in the word that precedes the adjective (either &quot;something&quot; or similar words).   By the way, I am not interested in the following constructions, which are different:  I want to paint the house red. I tried to build the brick house taller.  Thanks in advance! Proving ${n \choose p} \equiv \Bigl[\frac{n}{p}\Bigr] \ (\text{mod} \ p)$ How do I configure Apache 2 to run Perl CGI scripts? I would like to configure Apache 2 running on Kubuntu to execute Perl CGI scripts. I've tried some steps that I came across by googling, but nothing seems to work.  What is the right way of achieving this? Assume $f$ and $g$ are differentiable at $x$. Prove that $(fg)^{(n)} = \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}f^{(k)}(x)g^{(n-k)}(x)$   I am assuming here $fg = f(x) g(x)$. Then we can prove this via induction. If $n = 0$ we have $1 = 1$ which is true. Now assume it is true for some $m$ we need to show it is possible for $m+1$. We have $(fg)^m = \sum_{k=0}^m f^{(k)}(x)g^{m-k}(x)$. How do we show that? Can someone explain Cayley's Theorem step by step? This is from Fraleigh's First Course in Abstract Algebra (page 82, Theorem 8.16) and I keep having hard time understanding its proof. I understand only until they mention the map $\lambda_x (g) = xg$. Can someone explain this proof step by step? Thank you so much! Here is the proof:  Let $G$ be a group. We show that $G$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $S_G$. Define a one-to-one function $\phi: G \to S_G$ such that $\phi(xy)=\phi(x) \phi(y)$ for all $x,y \in G$. For $x \in G$, let $\lambda_x: G \to G$ be defined by $\lambda_x (g) = xg$ for all $g \in G$. The equation $\lambda_x (x^{-1} c) = x(x^{-1} c) = c$ for all $c \in G$ shows that $\lambda_x$ maps $G$ onto $G$. If $\lambda_x (a) = \lambda_x (b)$, then $xa=xb$ so $a=b$ by cancellation. Thus $\lambda_x$ is also one to one, and is a permutation of $G$. We now define $\phi: G \to S_G$ by defining $\phi(x) = \lambda_x$ for all $x \in G$. To show that $\phi$ is one to one, suppose that $\phi(x) = \phi(y)$. Then $\lambda_x = \lambda_y$ as functions mapping $G$ into $G$. In particular $\lambda_x (e) = \lambda_y (e)$, so $xe=ye$ and $x=y$. Thus $\phi$ is one to one. It only remains to show that $\phi(xy) = \phi(x) \phi(y)$, that is, that $\phi_{xy} = \lambda_x \lambda_y$. Now for any $g \in G$, we have $\lambda_{xy} (g) = (xy)g$. Permutation multiplication is function composition, so $(\lambda_x \lambda_y)(g) = \lambda_x (\lambda_y (g)) = \lambda_x (yg) = x(yg)$. Thus by associativity, $\lambda_{xy} = \lambda_x \lambda_y$. Prevent malicious bots from posting spam I remember  due to misuse and I wonder if bots have a part of it. If the bot is POSTing something to my site what are ways I can combat it? I was thinking of setting some cookies and having the cookies changed via JavaScript + timestamp and sign (so yesterday's cookies can't be used today and next week).  I'm sure most people/bots would just use another site instead of enabling JavaScript in their bot.  What else can I do? I'm thinking daily POST limit and a honeypot for generic bots who just randomly post spam. Does payment in goods count as "income" for tax purposes? Can someone help me elucidate the definition of "income" from a tax perspective? More specifically, if Joe is paid for his work in avocados instead of dollars, then would Joe be exempt from paying any income tax for the year? Or would the value of avocados earned for the year be translated into dollars which would then be considered Joe's annual income? If so, what guidelines would one use to make this translation? (Make the assumption that Joe does not sell the avocados (for dollars) at a later date and either eats them or trades them for other real property)  What if he was paid in gold instead of avocados? Is this correct? "One of the things that makes him great is..." One of the things that makes him great is he brings it every night.   I'm pretty sure it should be that make him in the plural, because one of the things is referring to a lot of things and a lot of things should take a plural verb. But I always hear native speakers in America say it in the singular, so with an s.  Another example:     This is one of the responsibilities that comes with greatness and he understands that.   Native speakers always use the verb in the singular (here, comes) even though [I believe] it is grammatically incorrect to use the singular form of the verb there. Should we improve time to first byte or Page Speed Insights score for SEO? Google posted last summer that "page speed" will impact the search result rankings also on mobile devices. But I think there is a little confusion about the term "page speed".  The test tool which Google offers is called "Page Speed Insights". Many people we are talking with, are thinking that the overall score of this tool for a particular site for example Desktop: 46/100 and Mobile: 45/100 is used for the ranking algorithm.  BUT I found a very interesting article in German language which states that only the TTFB (time to first byte) value is used and this should be optimized not all suggestions which "Page Speed Insights", further called PSI offers. Here is the link to the German article:   In short terms it says that a very large site in this case "The New York Times" has a low overall score of Mobile:41 and Desktop:45. As they are used to sell reader memberships they should  offer a great user experience. So, they should optimize their site. But when I call this site it is amazing fast. The overall PSI score does not reflect this behaviour. But when I believe this article the TTFB for this site is perfect. Also when I call it here from Austria it states 0.881sec.  I really like to know on which value we should focus our work for optimization not to fall in the ranking. Because as many of you already said it is not useful to implement all suggestions from the PSI site for one domain.  So, it would be real  if you could clarify things here or post links to official posts from Google. What I found about this, Google always is talking about "page speed" but what exactly is this? Installing particular versions when repo has newer versions? Let's have a metapackage which depends on the following packages  Depends: A (=2),  B (=2),  C (=2)   Note the '=' - I want to install these particular versions, not the most recent ones.  Additionally:  B depends on A(>=1)  C depends on B(>=1) and A(>=1)  If the most recent versions of A,B,C in the repository are 2 then this works.  Since I have put version 3 of A and version 3 of B in the repo sudo apt-get install my-meta-package refuses to finish with the following info:  The following packages have unmet dependencies:   my-meta-package: Depends: B (= 2) but 3 is to be installed                    Depends: A (= 2) but 3 is to be installed   If I manually install versions 2 of A and B then the metapackage installs correctly, which strongly suggests that there is no hidden dependency on A3 or B3. This is not a solution for the problem as the metapackage is installed automatically on many machines.  QUESTION: What to do to make sudo apt-get install my-meta-package install versions 2,2,2?  Additionally, is there a way I could get an extended info what actually creates the need for version 3 of A and version 3 of B?