how to make wi fi to work in ubuntu 14.04 and in dell n5010
Installing Broadcom Wireless Drivers
Vim-latex adds extra brackets when typing empty brackets Is “of ” necessary in “all of ”? Listen to all your fans   Name all the states   vs      Listen to all of  your fans   Name all of  the states   What part of language is of  in these examples? Is it necessary or optional, correct or incorrect? Pokemon GO isn't working at all for me right now. I'm in one of the following circumstances and can't do anything:   My game is displaying a "Try Again" message I'm stuck on the Loading Screen When I sign in I get a message that the servers are experiencing problems. I see the map but nothing is loaded, and my team color is wrong The "loading" Pokeball just ends up spinning and I can't catch or interact with things When I try to catch a Pokemon, the Pokeball just sits on my screen doing nothing Gym opponents will drop to 1 HP and won't take any more damage or attack When I open a pokestop, the pokestop image and the name of the pokestop does not load.   What's causing this? Is there a way to fix it? How can an uneducated but rational person differentiate between science and religion? I recently found myself unable to respond to the statement "But the big bang theory is just another creation myth!" during a science vs. religion argument. I found it very difficult to explain the difference between the big bang theory and creation myths without going through a crash course in Newtonian and then Relativistic mechanics.   This had me thinking of the following scenario: Consider a person who for various reasons never got a formal education beyond basic reading and writing. He/She doesn't know any science or math, and was never exposed to any scientific reasoning and experiments. She/He is however an open minded, level headed, and rational person (I've met more than one such person myself).   How would such a person differentiate science from religion? As far as he/she is concerned science has the exact same structure as religion:    A hard to understand scripture: Science treatises and journal papers.  An ordained clergy with a high entry barrier: Doctors, professors, scientists, etc... Seemingly arbitrary injunctions against certain behaviors: "Don't smoke", "Don't pollute",.... Various metaphysical (from his/her perspective) claims about the world around us: The big bang, other galaxies, blackholes, quarks,... Organizations which control and oversee doctrine: The FDA, The NIH, The NFS,...   From his/her perspective, all of these characteristics are no different than the way organized religion presents itself as being the source of truths about the world.   In particular if such a person were to heed the advice of the :         Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing (anussava),   nor upon tradition (paramparā),   nor upon rumor (itikirā),   nor upon what is in a scripture (piṭaka-sampadāna)   nor upon surmise (takka-hetu),   nor upon an axiom (naya-hetu),   nor upon specious reasoning (ākāra-parivitakka),   nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over (diṭṭhi-nijjhān-akkh-antiyā),   nor upon another's seeming ability (bhabba-rūpatāya),   nor upon the consideration, The monk is our teacher (samaṇo no garū) Kalamas, when you yourselves know: "These things are good; these   things are not blamable; these things are praised by the wise;   undertaken and observed, these things lead to benefit and happiness,"   enter on and abide in them.'      Following the Buddha's advice (ironically himself a religious figure), such a rational but uneducated person would have just as much reason to doubt the various results of scientists as to doubt the dogmas of organized religion.    How would it be possible for such a person to distinguish scientific facts from religious dogma?  How can we convince such a person of the validity of ideas like those of modern cosmology or evolutionary biology, without first having to teach them enough biology and physics to understand those concepts? I would like to filter the markers on my (geojson) layer according to two features: year and type of event, ideally using both filters (year and eventType) as check-boxes without using layerGroup at all. I would like to be able to click on a checkbox and update dynamically the markers by filtering them according to feature.properties.eventType too, in addition to the year displayed, something like    &lt;input type="checkbox" id="all" name="all" value="all"&gt;   &lt;label for="all"&gt;All&lt;/label&gt;   &lt;input type="checkbox" id="funfair" name="funfair" value="newsletter"&gt;   &lt;label for="funfair"&gt;Funfair&lt;/label&gt;   &lt;input type="checkbox" id="trade" name="trade" value="trade"&gt;   &lt;label for="trade"&gt;Trade&lt;/label&gt;   &lt;input type="checkbox" id="exhibition" name="exhibition" value="exhibition"&gt;   &lt;label for="exhibition"&gt;Paid exhibition&lt;/label&gt;   etc... which would trigger a  filter: function(feature, layer) {   return feature.properties.eventType == value-of-checkbox; }   I have five types of eventType. So, for instance, if 1890 is checked, the map is showing all 1890 events, no matter what kind of event it is (because by default it would show all events). If the user checks the 'funfair' and the 'trade' checkbox, though, I want the map to show only the 1890 events of the funfair and trade kind, and not other kind of events.  This is my complete script, which so far is working fine with filtering by year.  var oldmap = L.tileLayer('address', {   maxZoom: 12 }),  var modernmap = L.tileLayer('https://api.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/{id}/{z}/{x}/{y}.png?access_token={accessToken}', {   maxZoom: 12,   id: 'mapbox.streets',   accessToken: 'mytoken' });  var map = L.map('map', {   center: [40.1857864,-4.5536861],   zoom: 7,   layers: [oldmap, modernmap] });  var baseMaps = {   "Old map": oldmap,   "Modern map": modernmap };  var jsontest = {"type": "FeatureCollection",   "features": [     {       "type": "Feature",       "geometry": {         "type": "Point",         "coordinates":  [ -16.5471268,28.4136726 ]       },       "properties": {         "Name":"Point1",         "year":'1892',         "eventType":"funfair",         "notes":""       }     },     {       "type": "Feature",       "geometry": {         "type": "Point",         "coordinates":  [ 2.1753895,41.3767925 ]       },       "properties": {         "Name":"Point2",         "year":'1890',         "eventType":"trade demonstration",         "notes":""       }     }   ]};  var mapLayerGroupsYear = [];  function onEachFeature(feature, layer) {   var year = mapLayerGroupsYear[feature.properties.year];   if (year === undefined) {     year = new L.layerGroup();      //add the layer to the map     year.addTo(map);      //store layer     mapLayerGroupsYear[feature.properties.year] = year;   }    //add the feature to the layer   year.addLayer(layer);    }   var myLayer = L.geoJSON(jsontest, {   onEachFeature: onEachFeature })  L.control.layers(baseMaps, mapLayerGroupsYear).addTo(map);   I am a beginner with leaflet so please forgive the dumb question, in case it is. The choice between the gerund and the infinitive in a certain construction I am pretty much sure that for native speakers the issue I am going to bring up might look as an uncalled question as they can easily figure out which form of a verbal part of speech should be used, be it a gerund, an infinitive, or a bare infinitive. However, it can be pretty much misleading for a foreigner because the same construction works differently with different words and I don’t see a logical explanation. For example:  The purpose of this article is to analyze the issue…  My hobby is reading. One may assume, and many foreigners really come to this conclusion, that it’s OK to switch the “gerund” and “infinitive” as the meaning will stay the same, that is:  The purpose of this article is analyzing the issue… (same as 1 above)  My hobby is to read. (same as 2 above)   However, as I was told, this assumption is erroneous. Another example: His task was watching after them. (not good) His task was to watch after them. Is there any principle which governs the choice of the right form in such cases? I initially thought that dark energy must in some way violate conservation of mass and energy since the component of the energy density of space that comes from dark energy is constant, and space is expanding. Therefore, as space expands the energy in the universe that comes from dark energy would increase. I presumed the source of this energy was not coming from the conversion of other types of energy to dark energy, so it must violate conservation.  I decided to Google this and came upon this article:    It says that dark energy does NOT violate conservation and quotes Carroll, Press, and Turner (1992):  "…the patch does negative work on its surroundings, because it has negative pressure. Assuming the patch expands adiabatically [i.e. without loss or gain of heat], one may equate this negative work to the increase of mass/energy of the patch. One thereby recovers the correct equation of state for dark energy: P = – ρ c2. So the mathematics is consistent."  Is there a way to explain this in layman's terms? (The blog attempted to do this, but it was very unclear to me.) More specifically, can you explain where my initial train of thought described above fails when I erroneously concluded that dark energy violates conservation?  Thank you. I aim to show that $$(n+1)^n&lt;n^{(n+1)}$$ for all $n \geq 3$. I tried induction, but it didn't work. What should I do? I want to keep Ubuntu but remove Windows. Are there any good tools besides SeleniumRC that can fetch webpages including content post-painted by JavaScript? One major shortcoming of curl is that more and more wepages are having their main piece of content painted by a JavaScript AJAX response that occurs after the initial HTTP response. curl never picks up on this post-painted content.   So to fetch these types of webpages from the command line, I've been reduced to writing scripts in Ruby that drive the SeleniumRC to fire up a Firefox instance and then return the source HTML after these AJAX calls have completed.  It would be much better to have a leaner command line solution for this type of problem.  Does anyone know of any? Updating polygon areas in QGIS? I'm using QGIS 2.6 and regularly update a shapefile layer to indicate felling progress. However, if I edit the nodes of a polygon, save the layer out then look at the Attributes table the area shown doesn't change. How to prevent LaTeX from hyphenating the entire document? I can't find where I can remove any kind of hyphenation and just have LaTeX just do a line break.  edit: Honestly speaking I just don't like to read hyphenation anywhere and that's the only reason why I wanted to remove it. It is a matter of style, probably unexpected in LaTeX.  The document has only a summary in a different language and I used the language packages to hyphenate properly. "Unable to install GRUB in /dev/sda" when installing GRUB I recently bought a shiny new Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro and I want to dual boot it with Ubuntu for studying purposes. Its built-in OS is Windows 8.1 and it has a 256GB SSD.  I've made a separate 90GB partition just for Ubuntu and a live USB to install it.  The first time everything seemed to work great, I solved the wifi issued by blacklisting ideapad_laptop, the installation went flawlessly and Ubuntu worked fine.  When I got up the next morning and turned on my laptop it booted into Windows right away without ever showing the GRUB menu. So I tried to reset, and checked my partitions with the Disk Manager and everything looked fine. Since I couldn't find a solution online I went ahead and formatted the partition to try and install again. This time and every time since, the installation was aborted and I got a fatal error saying:  Unable to install GRUB in /dev/sda Executing `grub-install /dev/sda` failed. This is a fatal error.   Can anyone please suggest a solution to this problem? If any further information is needed I would be happy to provide it. Thanks.  When installing I get the following in details:  ubuntu kernel: [ 1946.372741] FAT-fs (sda2): error, fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0). ubuntu grub-installer: error: Running 'grub-install --force failed. Let K={(1),(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)} show that K is a normal subgroup of the alternating group of degree A4 and find all the members of A4/K and write down the group table for A4/K.   i know that K is the Klein four group and i have already proven it is a normal subgroup but i need a start on approaching the A4/K part of this question no direct answers are necessary,just ideas thank you! :) How do I remove directories that begin with a dot after my server was infected? My server had been infected and the attacker spread a bunch of .5randomletters folders around my file system, with malicious code inside of them. I want to search for all the folders that begin with a dot, review them and then remove them.  How can I do that? How can I distinguish between words which have the -ing in a sentence that are nouns, verbs, or adjectives?    For example sometimes -ing come with word to give us a noun, and sometimes a verb or an adjective.       That interesting snake.   That crawling snake.   That barking dog keeps everyone awake.     Is there any rule to determine whether a word with -ing is a noun, verb, or adjective? How do I watch a file for changes? Using "of" or apostrophe, which is more common? Interpretation of LASSO regression coefficients I'm currently working on building a predictive model for a binary outcome on a dataset with ~300 variables and 800 observations. I've read much on this site about the problems associated with stepwise regression and why not to use it.  I've been reading into LASSO regression and its ability for feature selection and have been successful in implementing it with the use of the "caret" package and "glmnet".   I am able to extract the coefficient of the model with the optimal lambda and alpha from "caret"; however, I'm unfamiliar with how to interpret the coefficients.    Are the LASSO coefficients interpreted in the same method as logistic regression? Would it be appropriate to use the features selected from LASSO in logistic regression?   EDIT  Interpretation of the coefficients, as in the exponentiated coefficients from the LASSO regression as the log odds for a 1 unit change in the coefficient while holding all other coefficients constant. Can regular expressions be used to match nested patterns? Is it possible to write a regular expression that matches a nested pattern that occurs an unknown number of times? For example, can a regular expression match an opening and closing brace when there are an unknown number of open/close braces nested within the outer braces?  For example:  public MyMethod() {   if (test)   {     // More { }   }    // More { } } // End   Should match:  {   if (test)   {     // More { }   }    // More { } }