Java Reflections API throwing NoSuchMethodError when getting all classes in package
How do I fix a NoSuchMethodError?
Work is not done by the magnetic field? Importing users that will be installed by programs This is question 2.9 #9 from Topics in Algebra by Herstein:     If $o(G)$ is $pq$ where $p$ and $q$ are distinct prime numbers and if $G$ has a normal subgroup of order $p$ and a normal subgroup of order $q$, prove that $G$ is cyclic.   Let $N$ denote the normal subgroup of order $p$ and $M$ denote the normal subgroup of order $q$. Here are a couple things I noted while exploring the problem:   $N$ and $M$ are cyclic, since they have prime order. $G = NM$ [1].   Any hints where to look next?    [1] Since $N,M$ are normal, $NM \le G$. Then $o(NM) \mid o(G)$, so $o(NM)$ is either $1$, $p$, $q$, or $pq$. The first three don't work because they force one of $N$ or $M$ to be $(e)$, so we have $o(NM) = pq$. Therefore, $NM = G$. How can I bind the meta key (a.k.a.  / Windows key) to a left click? Hitting the meta key should trigger a left click, and pressing down on it should allow me to drag and drop (just like it would do when holding down left click).  I tried using System Preferences -> Shortcuts and Gestures:    but I cannot set "meta" alone as being a shortcut.  I use Kubuntu 14.10 Plasma 4 and Kubuntu 14.04 LTS x64.   (On Windows 7 SP1 x64 Ultimate I can achieve that using the program .) Style Guide: Bold, Italic, or Quotes When I Want to Emphasize Something Let’s say I have many lists of this kind on a page:   Click on the Foo button. Tick the Bar box. Click on the Save button.   How should I emphasize Foo, Bar, and Save?   Bold?   Click on the Foo button. Tick the Bar box. Click on the Save button.  Italic?   Click on the Foo button. Tick the Bar box. Click on the Save button.  Quotes?   Click on the “Foo” button. Tick the “Bar” box. Click on the “Save” button.    NOTE: I want the lists to be read as easy as possible. $$ A $$  Light is travelling away from the absolute center of the Schwarzchild black hole (i.e. none of that spinning/stretching field) at $\ C $, and so shouldn't $\ \Delta C$ need to be greater than $\ C $ in order for the light to collapse into the black hole, therefore violating the relativistic limit of $\ C $?    It seems like light would just 'hover' right in the center of a black hole then. Because if it goes away from it, the event horizon pulls it back, and if it goes into it, the velocity change must be greater than $\ C $ which violates general relativity; so technically there's no way for the light to move away, and so it would just be still.  The thing is that the light must move at the speed of light or general relativity doesn't work. It's massless... But in the center of a black hole, if the above is true (it can't move or escape), then it is not travelling at the speed of light. So it cannot be still.  It cannot be spinning in a constant orbit either, because that would require velocity in an outward angle. And it cannot move in an outwardly fashion, only in an inwardly one.  Is it spinning in an infinitely decaying spiral towards the center?  If so what happens to it if and when it reaches the direct and complete center, i.e. The case of it being 'shot' from the center.    $$ B $$  If you shot light at an angle towards a black hole, but not directly to the center of it  then that light from the outside will eventually become the same as the light that I said was shot from the center to the outside; because in both cases, they end up in an infinitely decaying spiral.    If so it would end up exactly like the light in the above paragraph, so then we need to figure out what happens to that light to figure this one out, or vice versa.    $$ C $$  If you shot light directly towards the center of a black hole it would have no spiral to decay into, so therefore it must stop at some point in the center of a black hole. If it stops though, it loses it's momentum and violates general relativity again because it's energy "disappears".    If so then it violates conservation laws. So I'm assuming this simply is not true.    Is the light travelling into a black hole somehow still travelling at the speed of light, in every direction possible where that direction keeps it facing towards the center?  If so, why is there not a point at which the only thing left for the light to do is stay still, since all other paths would increase the distance between it and the black hole's center, and therefore become Case A. And if there isn't, what would happen if there was?  Also, if it's a time and observation answer where it supposedly takes and infinite amount of time for C to hit the center, wouldn't it be the case that the black hole is 'eating' all of the available light in the universe and keeping it in stasis?  Also, what happens in a Kerr black hole then? Does it just rip the field of time/gravity at an angle such that the light would never get closer than the center? Area 51 is miscounting my proposal followers I know of one person who is following my proposal who doesn't show up on the proposal webpage.    My proposal is for quantitative finance: .  It shows 19 people following the proposal (on the side of the page), and the total listed at the top of the page is 19 followers.  Yet one user is not listed: .  This makes me wonder if other followers are also not being counted? Is vocative comma rule vanishing? What is batch size in neural network? I'm using Python Keras package for neural network. This is the . Is batch_size equals to number of test samples? From Wikipedia we have  information:     However, in other cases, evaluating the sum-gradient may require   expensive evaluations of the gradients from all summand functions.   When the training set is enormous and no simple formulas exist,   evaluating the sums of gradients becomes very expensive, because   evaluating the gradient requires evaluating all the summand functions'   gradients. To economize on the computational cost at every iteration,   stochastic gradient descent samples a subset of summand functions at   every step. This is very effective in the case of large-scale machine   learning problems.   Above information is describing test data? Is this same as batch_size in keras (Number of samples per gradient update)? Could Tom Bombadil have defeated Sauron? I'm using LyX on Linux Mint 14 ...  Using BibTeX with the apalike style and some modifications in the preamble, I've managed to get the bibliography as it should be except for one thing. When I cite a work with multiple authors it gets printed with the separator "and" which isn't correct for my language (Danish). Curiously it's displayed correctly in the user interface of Lyx - for example "(Wittgenstein og Waismann 2003 - which led me to believe everything was ok but in the pdf the separator "and" is used both in the reference and in the bibliography.  Is there any way to fix this using BibTeX, or can it only be done with biber 1.5, as suggested in the last comment here:   I really hope their is because getting biber to work using the following guide has thus far proven to be impossible:   Help much appreciated ... I really hope I won't have to relapse into setting my master thesis up in LibreOffice. I am struggling with this question from Halmos's text, please ignore the imperative language.  "Suppose that $L, M$  and $N$ are subspaces of a vector space. Show that the equation    $$L \cap (M + N) = (L \cap M) + (L \cap N)$$   is not necessarily true.  Since each of these subspaces has origin in them, clearly there intersections could not be empty. I wasn't able to formulate an example where this result did n't hold. Any help would be highly appreciated. When using the \cite command in figure captions and the ieeetr bibliography style, then  BibTeX numbers the citations as appearing earlier than they do in reality (i.e. the first citation in the document ends up being [42]).  Is there any way to get BibTeX to ignore the \listoffigures section when numbering? how to auto start or enable service on next boot up or start up? in ubuntu 16.04 lts how to start or enable service on the next boot up or start up? in ubuntu 16.04 lts  without doing it manually enable or start services again everytime i start up or boot up the ubuntu 16.04 lts  thank you How to find the number of automorphisms on $\mathbb Z_2\times \mathbb Z_4$ Well, I was trying find out the number of group homomorphisms from $U(20)$ onto $U(15)$ which I reduce to the problem of finding the number of automorphisms for $\mathbb Z_2\times \mathbb Z_4$. But don't know how shall I proceed.   Any help will be appreciated. Does anyone know what song plays at about ? Show that the polynomial $X^5 + X^3 + \bar{1}$ in $(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}[X])$ is irreducible How many squares on a 5-foot grid does a 5-foot radius spell affect? We had a situation come up regarding this term and how it affected spells.  In the spell Moonbeam, for example, it says a 5-foot radius cylinder appears. Does this mean that from the center of square it extends 2.5 feet into the next square hypothetically hitting up three squares or does this mean from the edge of one the target square to the five feet and five feet the other direction effectively covering only two squares for a total of 10 feet between total range of both squares?  I understand that radius means half the distance of a circle from the center point. The spell is not the issue but the understanding of radius as it pertains to the spell, as there are other spells that are worded similarly such as Fireball, etc.  Essentially we are asking, does the spell in the example effect one square or three? This would be saying the edge of the initial square is the point of origin and not the center of the square for the total distance of ten feet.  I had been working under the understanding that the radius is half of the distance and therefore dragging a ruler from the center of where I want the spell to take effect would get me the area of effect.  It's much easier to do this with Fireball, due to the larger area to effect, but this one has such a small area and therefore sparked the debate. We are using a grid system to mark the distance, etc. We play within the digital realm of roll20.com. Why has my database connection failed? Recently I have developed software using SQL Server 2012. Now when I try to connect, I get this error message:     Cannot connect to AAFI\SQLEXPRESSA network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 – Error Locating Server/Instance Specified) I’m having trouble finding an official clarification of this, so I’m wondering if anyone has found a ruling:  Solarians gain powers known as stellar revelations. These are either “photon” or “graviton” revelations. It is specifically mentioned they can be used out of combat, though most include improved effects or separate powers that can only be used “while attuned” - a state a Solarian enters during combat. They may be photon or graviton attuned, at the player’s choice, and are able to increase their level of attunement each round until they become fully attuned to one or the other. However, apart from the very powerful “zenith revelations”, nowhere in the rules mentions whether photon revelations may only be used while photon attuned, or graviton revelations only while graviton attuned. The revelations themselves usually say “while attuned or fully attuned” for the more powerful effects, without mentioning the mode, and there’s no general rule in the class feature that answers this question.  Is there an official ruling on whether the “only while attuned” power of a photon revelation can be used when the character is graviton attuned, or vice versa? I suspect the answer is yes but it’s hard to tell based on the core rules.