Octal numbers in Computer Programming
In what situations is octal base used?
Label equations arbitrarily When I have equations, as in  \begin{equation} ... \end{equation}   Can I arbitrarily assign the numbers to the equations? Instead of the usual order (1), (2), (3), ..., I'd like something like (1), (2.1), (2.2), (2.3), (3.1), (3.2), (4), ... I no longer use the service that I originally used to register, and would like to change the service I use to log in, or at least add a second account.  Is this possible? How do I change my login provider or associate a backup method to log in?     For more information, see "" in the . How to pad zeroes to a string? Backup and restore settings in Texstudio Does someone know, how to save all the settings of Texstudio and restore them in a simple way?  Thank you in advance! How can text selection be disabled in Android 3.0 Honeycomb? Say, I have foo-1.2.3.deb which depends on perl and python, however, running command:  dpkg -i ./foo-1.2.3.deb   won't install these dependencies. So I must apt-get install perl python by hand.  How to make dpkg -i install these dependencies for me automatically? Proof a $(2n-1)$-compact manifold I have no idea how prove that $$\{(z_0,\ldots,z_n)\in\mathbb{C}^{n+1} \quad| \quad z_0^d+z_1^2\ldots+z_n^2=0, \quad |z_0|^2+|z_1|^2\ldots+|z_n|^2=2\}$$ is a $(2n-1)$-compact manifold.  How give the charts. For $n=1$ and $d=2$ not distinguish which 1- manifdold is? When is the present perfect tense used instead of the past tense? When is the present perfect tense used instead of the past tense?    I know that the present perfect tense is used when some adverbs (e.g., never, ever) are present in the sentence; the same is true for sentences like the following one.     When you returned, I have been at home since 3:00 PM.   In which other cases should I use the present perfect? Do the following sentences require it?     I have walked downtown everyday for a year.        I have been at home since 3:00 PM. What's the difference between using > and >> in shell? Why is this sequence of functions not uniformly convergent? For the following sequence of functions and its limit function, we can see that $f_n(x)$ is clearly pointwise convergent  $$f_n(x) = x^n\text{ }\forall x\in[0,1]\text{ and }\forall n\in\mathbb N^*\\ f(x) = \begin{cases}0&amp;\text{if } x\in[0,1)\\1&amp;\text{if } x=1\end{cases}$$  However, I was wondering why this is not uniformly convergent. The condition for uniform convergence is:  $$|f_n(x) - f(x)| &lt; \epsilon,\ \ \ \forall x \text{ when } n &gt; N$$  Now most sources present an argument along the lines of: assume that $f_n(x)$ is uniformly convergent and that $0 &lt; x &lt; 1$, this means that $x^n&lt;\epsilon$ whenever $n&gt;N$. Specifically, this would mean $x^{N+1}&lt;\epsilon$ for some fixed $N$. But if we now pick $x$ such that $1 &gt; x &gt; ε^{\frac{1}{N+1}}$, then this would lead to a contradiction, therefore $f_n(x)$ is not uniformly convergent.  However, I was wondering why couldn't we take $n$ to infinity. If $0 &lt; x &lt; 1$, then $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} |f_n(x) - f(x)| = 0$ (which is less than $\epsilon$). Now since $|f_n(x) - f(x)|$ will always be $0$ if $n &gt; \infty$, then wouldn't this be uniformly convergent? I have seen a "Universal Laptop Adapter" sold in a computer shop before. I am thinking of getting one for a laptop. Is it safe to use? What differences are there between one of these and a typical laptop adapter? Fundamental group of a torus with points removed Question 5.33 from "Topology and its Applications"  by Baesner is to compute the fundamental group of the torus ($T^2$) with $n$ points removed. I can "see" in my mind that if we remove one point we get a bouquet of two circles. Less clear is what happens when we remove two (or more) points. Any hints? Java Reflection Performance Does creating an object using reflection rather than calling the class constructor result in any significant performance differences? I am trying to balance underbraces in the equation below, how can I ensure that both underbraces at the same depth?  \begin{equation} y = \underbrace{ \left [ x^2 + r^2 (a^2+\frac{a^{0.3}}{b}) \right]}_\text{growth rate} \times  \underbrace{ C_0}_\text{initial} \end{equation} How can I take a photo using a slow shutter speed without it being overexposed? When I try to take a picture using a slow shutter speed in daylight it is overexposed. How can I change the settings so it isn't overexposed? At the moment I'm working with the . For this I read the following paper: .  But I have some mathematical problems with this formalism. I don't really see why this is a variation principle since it is opartor-valued.   The action principle is defined by: $\delta S  = G_1 -G_2$, where $S$ is the action operator $S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} dt ~L$ and $G$ the generator operators of the transformations.  What does it mean that the action principle is operator-valued? For the classical action where $S$ is real we search for a stationary point but for operators? I also have a problem that $\delta S \neq 0$. What interpretation has this additional term $G_1 - G_2$? How can I separate a separable function Is it possible to group several objects and then manipulate them (scale, rotate, translate) as one? C# 4.0 optional out/ref arguments Assume that $f: [0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ has a continuous $f''$ and $f$ is positive on the interval $(0,1)$ and $0$ at the endpoints.    I want to prove that $$\int_0^1 \Big| \frac{f''(x)}{f(x)} \Big| \,dx &gt;4. $$  I could not make any progress. Since the unit interval is compact, we know that the continuity of $f, f'$ and $f''$ are uniform and they attain their maximum and minimum values. Moreover, I tried to apply the Mean Value Theorem but I failed.