How to get Subtype name in Field using field calculator
Transfer subtype Descriptions form long integer value into a string at new diffrent field
Proving this identity $\sum_k\frac{1}{k}\binom{2k-2}{k-1}\binom{2n-2k+1}{n-k}=\binom{2n}{n-1}$ using lattice paths Java: how to parse double from regex How to pass variable number of arguments to printf/sprintf How do I disable the guest session? How do I disable the guest session in Ubuntu 11.10 or higher? I don't want people to be able to use my computer without using a password to log in! For symmetric stable distributions, why is $\alpha \le 2$? I am young, just started my career, and looking to begin investing so I can make my money work for me. I'm still living like I did in college (occasional purchase on myself, but most of it goes into savings) and I would like to take the extra money and invest it.   What would you suggest are the best options for me to begin? I was considering getting a personal investor [a financial advisor] for perhaps a year or so, but I've heard that they really are not worth the money. I wanted to get the input of the great minds here. Understanding Dirac's notation Why is a nonstop flight sometimes more expensive than multiple connections? Adding execute permission in opt folder I am trying to install oracle database in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I had unzipped the oracle database file in opt folder,but now when I am trying to give execute right to the sqldeveloper file using chmod +x sqldeveloper.sh, it's throwing this error:  chmod: changing permissions of 'sqldeveloper.sh': Operation not permitted Why does my pilot light keep going out? My furnace pilot light keeps going out so I changed the thermocouple. Now the furnace will come on and heat up to the degree set on my thermostat, then the pilot light will go out and the furnace will not come back on.    Could the thermostat be bad and cause the pilot light to go out? How to set Google+ photos to be Public-Unlisted (as you could do with PicasaWeb)? Previously, if I uploaded photos from Picasa to PicasaWeb, I could specify them as Public but Unlisted. So you had to have the link to view them but no login was required.  I don't see that option now that Picasa uploads to Google+.  Any ideas? Transit Visa in Hong Kong for 15 hour layover between India and USA? How to overlay images A word to describe someone or something that is not last? I'm looking for a word that describes the state of not being last. A word that would apply to everything in an ordered list that is not the last thing in that list.  From     I wasn't the last person to finish the race.   to (the phrasing is off, but it seems to illustrate my point)     I was .. person to finish the race.   One word that comes to mind is "intermediate", but I don't think that includes the first item in a list. Was The Empire in Star Wars inspired by Nazi Germany? I have been reading Geoff Cumming's 2008 paper  [~200 citations in Google Scholar] -- and  am confused by one of its central claims. This is one in the series of papers where Cumming argues against $p$-values and in favour of confidence intervals; my question, however, is not about this debate and only concerns one specific claim about $p$-values.   Let me quote from the abstract:     This article shows that, if an initial   experiment results in two-tailed $p= .05$, there is an $80\%$   chance the one-tailed $p$-value from a replication will fall in   the interval $(.00008, .44)$, a $10\%$ chance that $p &lt; .00008$,   and fully a $10\%$ chance that $p &gt; .44$. Remarkably, the   interval—termed a $p$ interval—is this wide however large   the sample size.   Cumming claims that this "$p$ interval", and in fact the whole distribution of $p$-values that one would obtain when replicating the original experiment (with the same fixed sample size), depend only on the original $p$-value $p_\mathrm{obt}$ and do not depend on the true effect size, power, sample size, or anything else:     [...] the probability distribution of $p$ can be derived without   knowing or assuming a value for $\delta$ (or power). [...] We do not assume any prior knowledge   about $\delta$, and we use only the information $M_\mathrm{diff}$ [observed between-group difference] gives about $\delta$ as   the basis for the calculation for a given $p_\mathrm{obt}$ of the distribution of   $p$ and of $p$ intervals.      $\quad\quad\quad$    I am confused by this because to me it seems that the distribution of $p$-values strongly depends on power, whereas the original $p_\mathrm{obt}$ on its own does not give any information about it. It might be that the true effect size is $\delta=0$ and then the distribution is uniform; or maybe the true effect size is huge and then we should expect mostly very small $p$-values. Of course one can start with assuming some prior over possible effect sizes and integrate over it, but Cumming seems to claim that this is not what he is doing.  Question: What exactly is going on here?    Note that this topic is related to this question:  with an excellent answer by @whuber. Cumming has a paper on this topic to:  -- but that one is clear and unproblematic.  I also note that Cumming's claim is repeated several times in the 2015 Nature Methods paper  that some of you might have come across (it already has ~100 citations in Google Scholar):     [...] there will be substantial variation in the $P$ value of repeated experiments. In reality, experiments are rarely repeated; we do not know how different the next $P$ might be. But it is likely that it could be very different. For example, regardless of the statistical power of an experiment, if a single replicate returns a $P$ value of $0.05$, there is an $80\%$ chance that a repeat experiment would return a $P$ value between $0$ and $0.44$ (and a $20\%$ change [sic] that $P$ would be even larger).   (Note, by the way, how, irrespective of whether Cumming's statement is correct or not, Nature Methods paper quotes it inaccurately: according to Cumming, it's only $10\%$ probability above $0.44$. And yes, the paper does say "20% change". Pfff.) "python" not recognized as a command ViewPager as a circular queue / wrapping How to add numbering to reference list but still use authoryear in natbib Is there an easy way to add numbers to the reference list generated by \usepackage[authoryear]{natbib} with whatever style file (using plainnat for ease)? Specifically, I use \cite and \citenum from natbib in order to have some references show up in the text as author-year and others just appear as numbers. Switching authoryear out for numbers in the natbib options generates a reference list with numbered references, but also causes the references in the text to all appear as numbers, which I don't want.  \documentclass[12pt]{article} % use larger type; default would be 10pt \usepackage[authoryear]{natbib} \begin{document}  \cite{A} said this, but other research \citenum{B,C} says otherwise.  \bibliographystyle{plainnat} \bibliography{MalariaBib,MST} \end{document} How can we get "Developer" bugs logged with Technical Support? I recently found a bug, which I mentioned on , as well as submitting a case, and after a few days fumbling around with the case, they closed it by saying that they only provide this type of support for Premier Support customers.  Is there a better channel for reporting bugs than by submitting a case, or is there something "special" we have to do? I realize this question is similar to , except that I've already gone the route of , as suggested by the answer there (i.e. submitting a case), to no avail.  How can I make sure that a bug like this can find its way to someone capable of at least confirming that the behavior was expected? This behavior isn't documented anywhere, and so I assume that it's a bug that needs to be addressed.