How to install wine in ubuntu 16.04?
Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages
What it says on the tin, a foreign friend of mine has asked and I can't tell him; apart from it sounding horrible.  For example:  "Why is it raining today?"   Instead of:  "Why it is raining today?" What does it mean for a QFT to not be well-defined? It is usually said that QED, for instance, is not a well-defined QFT. It has to be embedded or completed in order to make it consistent. Most of these arguments amount to using the renormalization group to extrapolate the coupling up to a huge scale, where it formally becomes infinite.  First of all, it seems bizarre to me to use the renormalization group to increase resolution (go to higher energies). The smearing in the RG procedure is irreversible, and the RG doesn't know about the non-universal parts of the theory which should be important at higher energies.   I have read in a note by Weinberg that Kallen was able to show that QED was sick using the spectral representation of the propagator. Essentially, he evaluated a small part of the spectral density and showed that it violated the inequalities for the field strength $Z$ that are imposed by unitarity + Lorentz invariance, but I do not have the reference.  So what I would like to know is :   What does it take to actually establish that a QFT is not well-defined?   In other words, if I write down some arbitrary Lagrangian, what test should I do to determine if the theory actually exists. Are asymptotically free theories the only well-defined ones?   My initial thought was: We would like to obtain QED (or some other ill-defined theory) using the RG on a deformation of some UV CFT. Perhaps there is no CFT with the correct operator content so that we obtain QED from the RG flow. However, I don't really know how to make that precise.   Any help is appreciated. Stripped out bottom bracket The bottom bracket of my bike was completely stripped to the point that when you push the left side crank arm, the right crank moves and you can see the bottom bracket lock move out the frame. The bike shop tried putting Teflon tape but it's temporary. It's a 26' xc hard tail. For all I know both sides of the bottom bracket(square tapered) are stripped clean hence the Teflon tape put by the previous owner. Can I fix the problem by changing into a hallow tech cranks because it works like a thread less bb, or should I just buy a thread less square tapered bb? Any suggestion on what to do? I came across following problem     Evaluate $$\int\frac{1}{1+x^6} \,dx$$   When I asked my teacher for hint he said first evaluate     $$\int\frac{1}{1+x^4} \,dx$$   I've tried to factorize $1+x^6$ as  $$1+x^6=(x^2 + 1)(x^4 - x^2 + 1)$$ and then writing  $$I=\int\frac{1}{1+x^6} \,dx=\int\frac{1}{(x^2 + 1)(x^4 - x^2 + 1)} \,dx=\int\frac{1+x^2-x^2}{(x^2 + 1)(x^4 - x^2 + 1)} \,dx$$ $$I=\int\frac{1}{x^4 - x^2 + 1} \,dx-\int\frac{x^2}{(x^2 + 1)(x^4 - x^2 + 1)} \,dx$$  However $$x^4-x^2+1=\left(x^2-\frac12\right)^2+\frac{3}{4}$$ But I can't see how it helps  I've also tried to reverse engineer the   And I need to have terms similar to $$\frac{x^2-1}{x^4-x^2+1} \quad , \quad \frac{1}{1+x^2} \quad , \quad \frac{1}{(x+c)^2+1}\quad , \quad \frac{1}{(x+c)^2+1}$$ in integrand, How can I transform my cute looking integrand into these huge terms?  Since in exams I will neither have access to WA nor time to reverse engineer the solution moreover it does not seem intuitive,is there any way to solve this problem with some nice tricks or maybe substitutions? This seems like a pretty softball question, but I always have a hard time looking up this function because there seem there are so many variations regarding the referencing of char and tchar. Prove that if $g^2=e$ for all $g$ in $G$ then $G$ is Abelian. What's the origin of the flattened X that appears when of a small (but powerfull enough) light is reflected in our non-powered TV screen? Is there a way to substring a string in Python, to get a new string from the third character to the end of the string?  Maybe like myString[2:end]?  If leaving the second part means 'till the end', and if you leave the first part, does it start from the start? Dual boot => Triple boot A 256GB SSD has Windows-10 and 16.04 installed.  BIOS not UEFI.  A charity I work with requires me to use Quickbooks Desktop on Windows.  The plan is to ghost the existing system to a 512GB or larger SSD and create a third bootable Windows 7  partition for performing charity activities.   Is this possible to have a third partition? Is there a good example you have used as a guide? Is triple booting with two Windows partitions different from 2 Linux partitions?   If you have done this before ( with GRUB) please indicate this in your response: lessons-learned are appreciated.  Thank you notify-send not working under ssh Maybe this is answered somewhere else, but I didn't see it.  I am running Ubuntu 14.04. When I SSH into my machine, for example:  ssh &lt;user&gt;@&lt;machineip&gt; notify-send "Hello"   I don't see anything on the monitor where I am logged into the machine. If I prefix notify-send with DISPLAY=:0.0 or DISPLAY=:0 nothing different happens. I just never see any notification on the current session.  Is there some trick/switch to getting this working?  In case this isn't clear, allow me to reiterate: From Computer A, I SSH into Computer B. Within the SSH session, I wish to execute notify-send to run on Computer B. I expect a growl-type notification to appear on the monitor of Computer B. In Days Of Future Past, Quicksilver spends a lot of time playing with electronics.  In his famous tour de force scene in the Pentagon, he specifically puts his headphones on before running around the kitchen.  But why?  Does the music on his Walkman speed up with him as he uses it, or is it still operating at "normal" speed? Or indeed, does any electronic device that he touches speed up? Why doesn't the mirror modifier work with object groups? Why doesn't the mirror modifier work with object groups? I have a group made of four objects to which I want to apply a mirror modifier. For me, it's not working. What are the steps to make apply a mirror modifier to a group of objects? Is there a word for four times as much, analogous to once, twice, and thrice? Is there a word for 'four times as much', analogous to once, twice, and thrice? Mac turns off randomly and has lines on screen For some reason my iMac keeps turning off around 5 to 10 minutes into boot.  Also just recently it turns on but has shaded lines going down the screen. I have not installed any weird programs and i have not used it in around 3 months.   Any ideas on what the issue is, i don't have any other information about the issue besides whats happening when i use it.  The image i'm showing you was found on google but this looks exactly like mine does.  The model of my imac is the late 2011 model. Technically, any odd number of backslashes, as described in .  &gt;&gt;&gt; r'\'   File "&lt;stdin&gt;", line 1     r'\'        ^ SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal &gt;&gt;&gt; r'\\' '\\\\' &gt;&gt;&gt; r'\\\'   File "&lt;stdin&gt;", line 1     r'\\\'          ^ SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal   It seems like the parser could just treat backslashes in raw strings as regular characters (isn't that what raw strings are all about?), but I'm probably missing something obvious. Segmentation Fault when attempting to print value in C Should I use 'or' or 'nor' after a negative statement? This document does not cover the SDK interfaces nor any other reference material.   I think the above is correct, but my grammatical checker in Microsoft Word underlines nor and suggests or. Why? Which of these are acceptable? Is one preferable over the other?   "Chemically-deposited tourmaline is never periwinkle." "Chemically deposited tourmaline is never periwinkle."   Also, is the title to the this question asking what I'm trying to ask?  (I realize that there are other questions about hyphenation in similar contexts; I'm asking specifically about -ly adverbs.) I understand that information cannot be transmitted at a velocity greater than speed of light. I think of this in terms of the radio broadcast: the station sends out carrier frequencies $\omega_c$ but the actual content is carried in the modulated wave, the sidebands $\omega_c\pm\omega_m$. The modulation envelop has its group velocity and this is the speed at which information is being transmitted. We also know, for example, that x-rays in glass have a phase velocity which is greater than the speed of light in vacuum.   My question is, what exactly is it that is travelling faster than the speed of light?    EDIT: I know it couldn't be anything physical as its superluminal. My problem is, what is it that has absolutely no information content yet we associate a velocity with it. Show address bar w. full path in Nautilus instead of breadcrumbs bar