When do we speak of imbalanced data?
When is unbalanced data really a problem in Machine Learning?
Finding determinant for a matrix with one value on the diagonal and another everywhere else Let us look the the matrix  $\left(\begin{array}{ccccc} a &amp; b &amp; b &amp; b &amp; b\\ b &amp; a &amp; b &amp; b &amp; b\\ b &amp; b &amp; a &amp; b &amp; b\\ b &amp; b &amp; b &amp; a &amp; b\\ b &amp; b &amp; b &amp; b &amp; a \end{array}\right)$  It has one value, $a$, on the main diagonal, and another value, $b$ everywhere else. Let us assume that we are over a ring and that $a$ is invertible.  I wish to find the determinant of every $n\times n$ matrix of this form ($a$ on the diagonal, $b$ everywhere else). Using row and column operations I have managed to transform the matrix to upper-triangular form and found formula for specific cases. Generalizing it I got to the following formula:  $\det(A) = a\left(a-b\right)^{n-2}\left(a+\left(n-2\right)b-\frac{\left(n-1\right)b^{2}}{a}\right)$  I think I can prove it with row-operations in the general case with a little patience.  However, I'm wondering if there is a "smart" way of getting to this formula that I'm missing and if there is a nicer representation of it. Also, what can be said when $a$ is not invertible? (esp. the case where we are over a field and $a=0$). I know it existed as sort of a folder in Windows Explorer in at least Windows XP, but I just can't seem to find it in Windows 7...  How can I take a picture with my webcam in Windows 7 without using any 3rd party tools? Log and natural log If you have a line passing through the middle of a circle, does it create a right angle at the intersection of the line and curve? More generally, is it valid to define an angle created between a line and a curve? Is the tangent to the curve at the point of intersection a valid interpretation (I.e a semi circle has 2 right angles) I saw it in a debate thread and it got me curious now. What does the 'rc' in `.bashrc`, etc. mean? Well, this is embarrassing. I feel like I just realised I don't know a loyal colleague's name after working with them for 10 years. "Hey, er... *cough!*, thanks for that great job you did on setting my aliases this morning..."  What do the letters rc signify in .bashrc, .kshrc, etc.?  If you know, please cite sources.  Even if you don't know, I'd also welcome unfounded assumptions, suggestions or alternatives if they're marked as such. What is the correct way to write 1.5 hours? I'm a bit confused in describing 1.5hrs in words.   Is writing one and a half an hour correct or should it be one and half hour?  E.g:     I'll see you there in one and a half an hour.     OR       I'll see you there in one and half hour.   Or is there any other correct way of writing this? Convert all text from uppercase to lowercase and vice versa? I've been playing the game a while now and have ranked up considerably. I'm wondering if there is any way to change to a different Google account and still keep all of my Pokemon/items etc, as I stupidly used my university gmail account when I first downloaded the app (which will be automatically deleted in September).   Is there any way to transfer my trainer/Pokemon/items etc to a different Google account? Proof $1+2+3+4+\cdots+n = \frac{n\times(n+1)}2$ How to show $f=g$ almost everywhere  Let two real-valued measurable functions $f$ and $g$ be such that for any measurable set $E$ the integrals $\int_E f\,d\mu$  and  $\int_E g\,d\mu$ coincide.  Could you please help.  It seems obvious. we could define the integrals as charges. can we do sth from here. but I do not know how to approach. Learning development with Force platform. Any good books? I'm a bit familiar with Java and SQL, any good books to get on coding in Apex for salesforce? The selected task "{0}" no longer exists. To see the current tasks, click Refresh When I start my task scheduler on Windows 7 I get a dialog with the following error:     The selected task "{0}" no longer exists.  To see the current tasks,   click Refresh     Also there's a UUID, that is displayed as the name and when I try to delete it I cannot, it just hangs around.  Is there a fix for this? I've often heard that Einstein shattered the notion of absolute motion (i.e. all things move relative to one another) and that he established the speed of light as being absolute. That sounds paradoxical to me; I cannot understand how the two concepts can be reconciled.  Before going further, I'd like to say: 1) Over the years, I've seen many layman's explanations on these topics (including the nice YouTube video by Vsauce, ). I understand everything that's said (or, at least, I think I do). Just nothing I've found seems to address this apparent contradiction. 2) More recently, I've tried to find the answer on my own. That includes searching the posts on this site. Some come close (), but nothing I've been able to find seems address specifically what I'm asking.  Back to the question: Relativity shows us that there is no universal frame of reference by which to judge motion, so object A might be reckoned as moving at 10&nbsp;m/s relative to object B or as stationary relative to object C. This is fine for me. I can grasp that the universe has no intrinsic coordinate system, that we only think that way on Earth because we have the ground to move over.  Then there's the speed of light (in a vacuum). The speed of light is the ultimate "speed limit," it's often said. But if there is no universal frame of reference, how can there be any such speed? The very idea only make sense if there is a universal frame.   If one object is moving (uniformly) at 60%&nbsp;c and another object is also moving at 60%&nbsp;c, but in the exact opposite direct, then from the perspective of either one (if they could still see each other) the other would appear to violate that speed limit. All these spacetime bending consequences used to explain why nothing can move past this speed only seems to enshrine the concept that there is some ultimate speed standard. If there is only relative speed, then the concept of light having a specific speed in the vacuum should be a nonsensical one since it having speed (x m/s) would only make sense when measured against some other body.   Since I was very young, it has always sounded to me like motion is only mostly relative, that until you get close to the speed of light, the effects of an absolute frame of reference are negligible. Perhaps that there is an actual fabric of space which everything moves relative to, which is why there is something to expand between galaxies (faster than light can propagate) in the metric expansion of space. Growing up, I always thought this would just start makes sense with time. Now I'm up to a first year (college) level in physics, I even know basic calculus, yet I'm still hopelessly confused.  EDIT:  Thank you to whoever suggested this may be a duplicate of . It and others are very much related and at least partially answer my question. Unfortunately, explaining that distances become shorter and time becomes slower as a way to stop you from exceeding the speed of light does not explain how that speed is not an absolute.  By my reckoning, if all speed is relative, then no matter how fast you go light should always race away from you at the same apparent speed. I.e. there should be no speed limit. For there to be a speed which you cannot exceed or you would catch up (and make time irrelevant) requires the very concept of some external speed by which light can travel and nothing else can reach - thus my logical paradox continues unabated. An inequality for a sum of sine functions I want to show for $x\in\mathbb{R}$, the following inequality holds. $$ \left|\sin x\right|+\left|\sin (x+1)\right|+\left|\sin (x+2)\right|&gt;8/5. $$ This trigonometric inequality has been verified by Mathematica using the Plot commend. However, using the sum formula for the sine function seems doesn't work, and I cannot give a rigorous proof of it. Any suggestion, idea, or comment is welcome, thanks! I am taking my first dive into testing a mobile app.  It will be available to iOS and Android.  I've been searching for a way to test and automate iOS without having an actual iPhone or any other Mac device.  We run Windows here at the office.  I was looking to use iPhone emulators but it doesn't seem possible.  I saw Appium Studio/SeeTest but it seems even that requires iTunes and a real device.  I know you can set up a Mac vm on a Windows machine but are there any other ways to test iPhone without having to do this? I was watching the  tutorial by Andrew Price and I was able to follow along in Cycles until I hit the part where he mixes the day and night materials together so that the lights show up on the "dark side" of the earth.  How can I recreate this effect in cycles? I thought I could use the ray information to tell me if there was incoming light but I've found no such node to give me this information. Since many users are facing the NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object error in Unity, I thought that it would be a good idea to gather from multiple source some explanation and ways to fix this error.  Symptoms I am getting the error below appearing in my console, what does it mean and how do I fix it?  NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object Can markdown mini replace an en dash with a normal hyphen in URLs? Windows 8 disk usage is 100% How to write a Hello World application in Java?