Why use pure functions?
Functions vs. patterns
I have two lightning component placed on one page lightning app. First Component have refresh icon and I set onclick action to refresh Component $A.get('e.force:refreshView').fire(); but this event refresh the whole page instead of First component.  how can refresh only one component on page not all the page ? I read this book series in middle school. I believe that it would be classified as young adult fiction/fantasy. A girl has magical powers, and with her growing powers comes runes/tattoos in her arms. This is shown on every book cover. I know that one cover is blue. This one shows the girl in a black tank top and black pants. One is a yellow cover, with her in a dress (I think).  The girl has a friend/mentor, who she develops feelings for. The girl is the key to stopping a war between multiple factions/people. Each side is trying to use her to their advantage. I think the series was written in the early 2000s. I was playing modern with the owner of a shop.  He played a  which he used to bring in 7 lands: 5 basic mountains and 2  cards.  He then claimed that each  triggered 5 times (killing me).  I am doubting this now.    Here is my reason: The two  cards entered at the same time as the other 5 basic lands.  That means when they were on the battlefield and their ability was in effect, the other 5 basic lands were already there too.  That seems too late to trigger a "Enters the Battlefield" effect.  So here is my question.  Am I right or wrong?  If I am wrong, please show me how the enter the battlefield effect can trigger for something that enters the battlefield at the same time as itself.  If I am right, please show me the rules that prove it.  I now have two shop owners that are convinced that this is a legal play.  If it is not legal, I am going to need clear rules citations to convince them.    Side note:  If I am wrong and it is a legal play, then I have a follow up scenario.  Say I have 2  cards and 5 other human cards in my graveyard.  If I play a spell that lets me return all of them to the battlefield at the same time (say ), would the  cards get 6 +1/+1 counters on them?    To me, if the trick that was played on me with  is legal then my  cards should also get the +1/+1 counters. I  to the question "" which was specific to the question asked.  Another user engaged positively with my answer, as there was a small conversation thread.  That person then  and made what I would say are minor modifications (the comments I left in my original code that pertained to the specific case are still in the places where he made edits to be more specific).  The answer does acknowledge that it is a general case of my specific code.  Ignoring the fact that I'm involved in it, what should one do when seeing this situation?  The only thing I can think of, and I'm not sure that it's necessarily the right solution, is to flag the answer for moderator attention.  Other possible actions, which I believe are wrong, are:   Editing the answer; that would change its intent Voting the answer down; it's a technically correct answer   One could leave a comment, but that can lead to confrontation and escalation (depending on the parties involved) which would be counterproductive.  The only thing I've done, which is not really related, is edit the answer to hyperlink the already existing attribution (but I do this as a regular edit for any answer which explicitly references another).  What's the best approach here, if any? Solve the equation $x^2+\frac{9x^2}{(x+3)^2}=27$ Does $G\oplus G \cong H\oplus H$ imply $G\cong H$ in general? I'm about to fly from Istanbul to Seoul and I have a useful amount of Turkish Lira (TRY) left but I don't have any South Korean Won (KRW) to pay for the metro to my hostel when I get there.  Several times in the past I've ended up being stuck with currencies that are very difficult to exchange in the country I've arrived in.  Can I buy KRW at the airport in Istanbul?  (I've also asked , since Stack Exchange questions are meant more for the long tail than just for the original asker.) Suppose $X,Y$ and $Z$ are multivariate normal with means and full covariance matrix. The conditional expectation $E(X | Y)$ is well know. What is the conditional expectation of $E(X | Y,Z)$ if $Y$ and $Z$ (and $X$) are correlated? Standard textbooks only seem to cover the case when $Y$ and $Z$ are uncorrelated. How would one write object-oriented code in C? Difference of Gamma random variables An inequality from Littlewood's Miscellany I have been wondering what a gold piece is worth, due to the fact there are many things that cost the same, but in reality, are probably worth radically different prices, such as a Goat and a Whip, which both cost 1 gp.  What is a gold piece really supposed to be worth? Like, how would things be priced if they were in familiar modern monetary units instead of "gp"? That would give me something to base my adjustments to abnormal prices on, such as items not listed in the PHB. Fantasy book with shape shifting dragon warriors Set in a fantasy world with shape shifting Dragon kings and their warriors. They terrorize the humans, and kill those with magic.   The protagonist is the great-grandson of a powerful warlock. He finds out that he has magic, and fights with it to save his new friends, the Griffin, Blackhorse (I think that's his name), some creepy necromancer who is immortal, and Gwen (fellow sorceress), along with the kingdom that the Griffin rules in.   They fight the protagonist's father, the leader of the Dragon kings, the king's Duke, and the creepy sorcerer, who has a curse (when he dies, he changes side from good to bad, or bad to good). I have no clue what this is called, but I want to find out, since I'm out of things to read. Prove that if $a+b+c$ divides $abc$, then $a+b+c$ must be composite. I have seen another post for this same question but it never got an answer. Since I am fairly new, I can't comment on other's posts, therefore I am creating a new one. The question states:  If a, b, and c are positive integers, prove that if $(a + b + c) | (a*b*c)$, then $a+b+c$ is composite.  I do not really know how to approach this.  The link to the post with the same question is: Why is this true?  $(\exists x)(P(x) \Rightarrow (\forall y) P(y))$ Post hoc test after ANOVA with repeated measures using R Implement MicroController Power Switch and re-use the button for other features This is similar to other questions, but I feel it is different because of the reuse of the "power" button.   I want a "latching" Momentary Power button.  Behavior:   User Pushes momentary button, holds down as long as necessary and the device powers up. Between Power On and Off the same button will be re-used for other functions  When it is held down for 5 +/- seconds the MicroController will turn itself off.    Design Constraints:   Battery provides between 3.7V to 2.9V during it's usable life The Voltage regulator requires Vin +/- 0.3V on the Enable Pin, 3.1V output. MicroController operates at 3.1V MicroController Output Pin High state is 2.7V Max   Debouncing: In this case I'm not concerned about debouncing the switch, if the user doesn't hold it down long enough for the MicroController to set it's Digital Output pin  High the device doesn't power on.  I've worked up the following schematic, which kind of works.    It assumes 3.7V from the battery. Uses an Analog Input for the Power button, which then uses the variation in voltage to determine if the button has been pressed. In the current design the difference is 0.12 V (from 3.4 to 3.52), but the MicroController has a 12 bit ADC so that shouldn't be a problem, in addition I can adjust the sensitivity range of the ADC.   Questions:  What is the difference between reality and the simulator?  Is there a better way?  How can I get a greater voltage difference on the button input? I've tried many different combinations but they increase the voltage range above the 3.6V Input High Maximum specified in the datasheet.  I'm not excited about the "Leakage current" when the uC Controlled Power Pin is Low, any suggestions?   Thank you for any ideas/suggestions/answers. input to pic with 12V and resistors I have 12V, Use these 12V to power a device (that has a 12V output signal) and to power a 7805. After the 7805 there is a pic microcontroller where I would have to connect the output from my device. I was thinking of having 2 resistors in a 3/1 ratio in order to have about 4V at the pin of the pic. Can this be done, given that the ground is common, or will it give some sort of problem with the lm7805? Double booked - User bookmarking question recorded twice In this  one user is shown as having bookmarked  twice:  This doesn't appear to be the same question as:  or  though it's certainly possible that the cause is the same. I just uninstalled TeX Live 2016 and installed TeX Live 2017 and I noticed that the vertical alignment of author and title in any beamer presentation with Warsaw theme has been disrupted. In this example the author is JESTIN and the title is Beamer Intro. How can I vertical center them?  Moreover, I just found the same bug in the beamer guide obtained writing texdoc beamer in the command prompt, in the part of a warsaw presentation.    Here is my code:  \documentclass{beamer}  \usetheme{warsaw}  \title[Beamer Intro]{Beamer - Introduction to \LaTeX{} presentation making} \author[JESTIN]{Jestin Joy}  \begin{document}  \begin{frame}   \titlepage \end{frame}  \end{document}