Any way possible to make live usb come with usable default settings and programs
How to use Cubic to create a custom Ubuntu live CD image?
In the double-slit experiment of electrons (observed by photons), is it correct to say the collapse is caused by the momentum of the photons? I'm working off the article, . I think it's well-written, but I'm not convinced about this part:     So what is causing the change in the particle’s behaviour?      In the example given above, when electrons are fired at a fluorescent screen, when we bombard the electrons with photons the interaction changes the state of the system catastrophically as, despite lacking mass, photons do carry momentum.   Here the author strongly implicates the momentum of photons as being responsible for the collapse. But is that correct to say?  I have read that the  verified that obscuring which-way information restores wave-like behavior. So it feels to me it's more about some "outer" state (perhaps well-characterized as "information") that we don't yet understand that collapses the system, not per se the photon-electron interaction.  Or am I wrong, and in fact for example, the process of obscuring in the quantum eraser experiments somehow "undoes" the photon-electron interaction or restores the quantum state through another interaction? How to kill The Twins In Terraria In Terraria I often try to defeat spazmatism first, but when he transformed, his flamethrower killed me. What is easiest way to kill The Twins? It seems that Mac OS X 10.6.1 Snow Leopard has a tendency to leave some windows off-screen at times, especially when I disconnect an external monitor from my MacBook. How can I move the window back on-screen when it's not possible to grab the title bar and drag it back onto the screen?   recommends adjusting your screen resolution downward to have off-screen windows "snap back into view" and then adjust your screen resolution back to its original setting. In OS X 10.4 Tiger, I had a script that brought all off-screen windows back on-screen, but in my upgrades to Leopard and now Snow Leopard, I don't seem to have that script.  Any better solutions out there? A regular challenge that I face is balancing two (or more) logos. Whether they need to be equal or one needs to be given priority. Some logos however might be squares, others rectangles, circles, etc...   As a quick sample I snagged a nice high resolution photo from  and pretend its going to be an advertisement that needs to show some footwear brand logos on it. In this case I used Adidas and Saucony.  This is certainly not balanced even though they're height is the same:    Likewise this is not balanced even though they're width is the same:    So then the question becomes when are they in balance, is this balance:    Maybe a little more adjustment, is this balance:    And in these examples I'm only working with two Black Logos. Factor in color and it can get even more difficult to balance. Another issue being when there's tiny text as part of the logo.  So the question is, other than estimating / eye-balling it, what tips, methods or even tools are there to balance different sized logos? Will adding more RAM speed up my computer? Apparently, you can speed up your computer by adding more RAM. Is the amount of ram to be added is directly or indirectly related to the amount of hard-disk  space, processor speed, Motherboard etc... Can the memory of a RAM be compared with Virtual Memory and Cache Memory?  Note: About my PC Configuration: Intel core i5 processor, Motherboard DP55WB 4GB RAM, 700 GB Hard-disk space. derivative of a determinant of matrix Let $A,B\in M_{n\times n}(\mathbb{R})$, prove that $$(\frac{d}{dt}\det(A+tB))_{t=0} = Tr(cof(A)^{T}\cdot B), $$ where $cof(A)$ is the cofactor matrix of $A$. I tried expanding it using row expansion, but it gets messed up. Any help? Let's say we have this code for a LWC:  &lt;!-- helloExpressions.html --&gt; &lt;template&gt;     &lt;div class="slds-m-around_medium"&gt;         &lt;lightning-input name='firstName' label="First Name" onchange={handleChange}&gt;&lt;/lightning-input&gt;         &lt;lightning-input name='lastName' label="Last Name" onchange={handleChange}&gt;&lt;/lightning-input&gt;         &lt;p class="slds-m-top_medium"&gt;Uppercased Full Name: {uppercasedFullName}&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/template&gt;   and this is the JS file:  // helloExpressions.js import { LightningElement, track } from 'lwc';  export default class HelloExpressions extends LightningElement {     @track firstName = '';     @track lastName = '';      handleChange(event) {         const field = event.target.name;         if (field === 'firstName') {             this.firstName = event.target.value;         } else if (field === 'lastName') {             this.lastName = event.target.value;         }     }      get uppercasedFullName() {         return `${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`.toUpperCase();     } }   firstName and lastName have been decorated with @track. Now as per the documentation, decorating a property with @track makes it private and reactive, while to mark a property public and reactive, use @api.  So if I just change the decorator to @api for both these variables, it should work. I am referring these from the same component only. But it's not working.  UPDATE: 27th Feb -------------------- Somehow it's working today. I just changed the decorator of the variables to api.  import { LightningElement, api } from 'lwc';  export default class HelloExpressions extends LightningElement {     @api firstName = '';     @api lastName = '';      handleChange(event) {         const field = event.target.name;         if (field === 'firstName') {             this.firstName = event.target.value;         } else if (field === 'lastName') {             this.lastName = event.target.value;         }     }      get uppercasedFullName() {         return `${this.firstName} ${this.lastName}`.toUpperCase();     } }   So it's working. Which facility upgrade unlocks maneuver nodes in KSP ResultSet: Retrieving column values by index versus retrieving by label When using JDBC, I often come across constructs like    ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery(); while (rs.next()) {     int id = rs.getInt(1);     // Some other actions }   I asked myself (and authors of code too) why not to use labels for retrieving column values:    int id = rs.getInt("CUSTOMER_ID");   The best explanation I've heard is something concerning performance. But actually, does it make processing extremely fast? I don't believe so, though I have never performed measurements. Even if retrieving by label would be a bit slower, nevertheless, it provide better readability and flexibility, in my opinion. So could someone give me good explanation of avoiding to retrieve column values by column index instead of column label? What are pros and cons of both approaches (maybe, concerning certain DBMS)? Are comments discouraged in a BibTeX file? biber complains about "junk" in what should be seen rather as commented-out lines in a BibTeX file.  I was wondering if comments are discouraged in BibTeX at all.  \documentclass {article}  \usepackage {filecontents}  \begin {filecontents} {ref.bib}  @book {book1,  author={author 1},  title={title 1}}   book {book2,  author={author 2},  title={title 2}}   @book {book3,  author={author 3},  title={title 3}} \end{filecontents}  \usepackage [backend=biber] {biblatex} \addbibresource {ref.bib}  \begin {document}   \nocite{*}  \printbibliography \end {document}   Here is biber's output:  INFO - This is Biber 2.1 INFO - Logfile is 'mwe.blg' INFO - Reading 'mwe.bcf' INFO - Using all citekeys in bib section 0 INFO - Processing section 0 INFO - Looking for bibtex format file 'ref.bib' for section 0 INFO - Decoding LaTeX character macros into UTF-8 INFO - Found BibTeX data source 'ref.bib' WARN - BibTeX subsystem: /tmp/No7MbpTruX/ref.bib_31209.utf8, line 13, warning: 43 characters of junk seen at toplevel INFO - Overriding locale 'en-US' defaults 'variable = shifted' with 'variable = non-ignorable' INFO - Overriding locale 'en-US' defaults 'normalization = NFD' with 'normalization = prenormalized' INFO - Sorting list 'nty' of type 'entry' with scheme 'nty' and locale 'en-US' INFO - No sort tailoring available for locale 'en-US' INFO - Writing 'mwe.bbl' with encoding 'ascii' INFO - Output to mwe.bbl INFO - WARNINGS: 1 Why are NginX and Lighttpd not affected by Slowloris? I am investigating the vulnerability to  and I think I understand how and why this sort of attack works.  What I don't understand is why Lighttpd and NginX are not affected (according to the same article as linked above). What do they make so different? Hyperref - Token not allowed Possible Duplicate:          The following code:  \subsection{The classes $\mathcal{L}(\gamma)$}   generates the errors:  Package hyperref Warning: Token not allowed in a PDF string (PDFDocEncoding): (hyperref)                removing `math shift' on input line 1938.   Package hyperref Warning: Token not allowed in a PDF string (PDFDocEncoding): (hyperref)                removing `\gamma' on input line 1938.   Package hyperref Warning: Token not allowed in a PDF string (PDFDocEncoding): (hyperref)                removing `math shift' on input line 1938.   What do I have to do to keep \gamma in the subsection, so that it is also listed in the table of contents? Show that $a^{61} \equiv a\pmod{1001}$ for every $a \in \mathbb{N}$ Formal basis for variable substitution in limits So we do a lot of variable substitution in limits at school. Stuff like $\lim\limits_{x\to5}\ (x+1)^2\ =\ \lim\limits_{y\to6}\ y^2$, where we define the substitution $y = x + 1$.  But I've never been clear on what exactly the theoretical basis for this is. What is the formula that you're actually applying when you do variable substitution? What are the formal conditions under which it is possible?  My conjecture would be the following:  For all continuous $f$, and all real $a$: $\lim\limits_{x\to a}\ (f\circ g)(x)\ =\lim\limits_{x\to g(a)}\ f(x)$, where $g$ is a continuous function  So to take my first example, $f$ would be $x^2$, $g$ would be $x + 1$, and $a$ would be $5$.  Am I in the right area? If this is correct, can it be proven using $\epsilon$-$\delta$? I had a half-hearted shot at it the other night and didn't get anywhere. For one of the clients, I have spin up a modern communication site collection and on the landing page of the same, I am seeing 'Get the mobile app' showing up, I was able to hide the 'feedback' button using css but no luck with Get the mobile app button.  Can someone please share css to hide 'get mobile app' button, appreciate the help. This is a homework question. But I am completely stuck.  My only intuition was to go about it inductively from a "greedy algorithm" maybe know as the deletion-contraction algorithm. And to somehow use the information about the jth cycle to solve the j+1th. But I'm not sure how I'd do it. Thank you very much for looking this over. Does "minor revision" mean "accepted with minor revision"? I just received a decision letter from a journal editor (after three rounds of major revision). The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. Is this normal? Can I assume that this basically means "acceptance with minor revision"? Thanks for your insight and sharing. How do I embed a gather environment within a custom environment? I've tried defining the following custom environment, but I get errors:     \begin{gather} ended by \end{solution}   etc...   Here's a MWE showing my problem:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[fleqn]{mathtools}  \newenvironment{solution}{%  &lt;-Solution   \par\addvspace{1em}   \itshape{Solution:}\par\begin{gather}}   {\end{gather}\par\normalfont\hfill\qed\par\addvspace{\medskipamount}}%  \begin{document}   \begin{gather}     testing   \end{gather}    %% This does not work:   \begin{solution}     testing   \end{solution} \end{document} `find` with multiple `-name` and `-exec` executes only the last matches of `-name` I noticed that my American friends tend to use the past perfect form when they use the verb mention in its past form, almost despite of the context of the sentence. I hear them say  "you had mentioned" a lot more often even in situations where the use of simple past would have been perfectly fine. Have you noticed it too and is it one of those unwritten rules, or is there a more formal explanation to it?  It seems like there was more verbs like that, but I am having a hard time remembering it now. If I do, I will edit the post and likely change the title to accommodate other verbs.