What is meant by Terminal
What is a terminal and how do I open and use it?
primes whose difference is a multiple of $n$ In (non-relativistic) classical physics, if the temperature of an object is proportional to the average kinetic energy ${1 \over 2} m\overline {v^{2}}$of its particles (or molecules), then shouldn't that temperature depend on the frame of reference - since $\overline {v^{2}}$ will be different in different frames?  (I.e. In the lab frame  $K_l = {1 \over 2} m\overline {v^{2}} $, but in a frame moving with velocity $u$ relative to the lab frame, $K_u =  {1 \over 2} m \overline {(v+u)^{2}}$). General formula for evaluating integrals of the form $\displaystyle\int_0^\infty x^ae^{-bx}dx$ What is the difference between "is subject to" and "is subjected to"? I found the following sentence on the U.S. Customs and Border Protection website:     All persons, baggage, and other merchandise arriving in or leaving the   United States are subject to inspection and search by CBP officers.   I would like to know whether changing "subject" to "subjected" will change the meaning of the sentence. Lookup City and State by Zip Google Geocode Api Quantum mechanics and everyday nature Is there a phenomenon visible to the naked eye that requires quantum mechanics to be satisfactorily explained? I am looking for a sort of quantic Newtonian apple. I use a Full HD 24" external display besides my 15" MacBook Pro Retina, on which I use the option for most screen estate regarding the Retina display. In the display arrangement screen, the MacBook Pro is therefore a bigger rectangle than the external display. Is there a way to size these rectangles regarding their "real world size" instead of resolution? I'm annoyed by my cursor teleporting vertically whenever I move from one display to another. I'm desperatly confused by notations and formulations so if someone could clarify the following things a little Í would be deeply grateful. The Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow}$ of the proper orthochronous Lorentz group $SO(1,3)_+^{\uparrow}$ is given by \begin{equation} [J_i,J_j]=i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k \end{equation} \begin{equation} [J_i,K_j]=i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k \end{equation} \begin{equation} [K_i,K_j]=- i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k \end{equation} We can now define new generators with the old ones $N^{\pm}_i= \frac{1}{2}(J_i \pm i K_i)$ which satisfy \begin{equation} [N^{+}_i,N^{+}_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} N^{+}_k ,\end{equation} \begin{equation} [N^{-}_i,N^{-}_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} N^{-}_k ,\end{equation} \begin{equation} [N^{+}_i,N^{-}_j] = 0. \end{equation} where we can see that $N^{+}_i$ and $N^{-}_i$ make up a copy of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ each. My problem is to get what is going one here mathematically precise. Are the following statements correct and if not why:  When we build the new operators from the old generators we complexified $\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow}$ \begin{equation}(\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C} = \mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow}\otimes \mathbb{C} \end{equation} We saw that $\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C}$ is isomorph to two copies of the complexified Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{su(2)}$: $(\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C} \simeq \mathfrak{su(2)}_{\mathbb{C}} \oplus \mathfrak{su(2)}_{\mathbb{C}} $. Where exactly did we need that $\mathfrak{su(2)}$ is complexified here? The Lie algebras defined by $N^{\pm}_i$ are exactly those of $\mathfrak{su(2)}$ and we never use complex linear combination of $N^{\pm}_i$ or am I wrong here? $\mathfrak{su(2)}_{\mathbb{C}}$ is isomorph to $(\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C}$: \begin{equation}\mathfrak{su(2)}_{\mathbb{C}} \simeq (\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C} \end{equation} Here $(\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C}$ denotes the complexified Lie algebra of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ Is $(\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C} \simeq (\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{R}$ correct?  Here $(\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{R}$ denotes the real Lie algebra of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ Is $(\mathfrak{so}(1,3)_+^{\uparrow})_\mathbb{C} \simeq (\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C} \oplus (\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C}$ correct?  I looked this topic up in different books and each seemed to state something different. One book even used three differrent versions of $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}) $ namely: $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}) $, $(\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{C}$ and $(\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}))_\mathbb{R}$.  states simply that $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}) $ is the complexification of $\mathfrak{su(2)}$ without making any reference to $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ which does not help me either. Any help would be great. Functions of Independent Random Variables Well, one example is this file of the game The Sims 2 for PS2: quickdat.arc. The file contains this .arc extension, but it's no one an archive file and it contains some data of the game inside. How can I do this? Put so many files in one?  How to do something like this? All the game files inside one without using a file compressor? Which of the following polynomials are subspaces of $\mathbb{P}_n$ for an appropriate value of n? Definition. A subspace  of a vector space V is a subset H of V that has three properties  (a) The zero vector of V is in H.  (b) $\forall$ u, v $\in H$, we have  u + v $\in H$.   (c) $\forall$ u $\in H$, c scalar, we have c  u $\in H$.  For $n \geq$ 0, denote $\mathbb{P}_n$ to be the set of all polynomials of degree at most $n$.  Which of the following are subspaces of $\mathbb{P}_n$ for an appropriate value of $n$? Support your answer with reason.  (a) All polynomials of the form $p(t) = a + t^2$, where $a \in \mathbb{R}$.  (b) All polynomials of degree at most 3, with integers as coefficients.  Solution:  Both the statements (a) and (b) above are not subspaces of $\mathbb{P}_n$.  Reason:  For part (a), All polynomials of the form $p(t) = a + t^2$, where $a \in \mathbb{R}$, is not a subspace because it failed to meet the standards of the first property stated above, that is, the coefficient of the $t^2$ term is always a 1, therefore the zero vector is not in this subspace of polynomials.    For part (b), All polynomials of degree at most 3, with integers as coefficents is also not a subspace becuase it as well failed to meet the standards of the third property, that is, integer coefficents, when multiplied by a real scalar, will not necessarily be of integer type leading to integer coefficents. Thusly, the resulting polynomial will not be in the subset of polynomials $\mathbb{P}_n$. $\Box$  Can someone please look at this and see if I have the right idea and approach to this question. Thank You Outline around text on CMYK black background in Photoshop I'm trying to make a document with one color black  (c:0,m:0,y:0,k:100) background with red text on it. However in CMYK the text has this weird grey white-ish edge. In RGB it doesn't show but in CMYK it shows. I'm wondering will this show when printing or do I need to use different methods? ie. using rich black etc.  Here's the RGB and CMYK comparison in -> inner  out -> outer / (outter?)  What is the history or set of rules behind why 'inner' doubles the 'n' but 'outer' doesn't double the 't'? Probability question with interarrival times (Why did the chicken cross the road?) A chicken wants to cross a single-lane road where the cars arrive according to a Poisson process with rate $\lambda$. She needs at least $k$ minutes to cross the road safely, so she will have to wait until she sees a gap of at least $k$ between the oncoming cars. If the gap between the car that just arrived and the next one is at least $k$ then she starts crossing the road immediately. Let $T$ denote the random time she needs to wait by the road.  Find the expected time needed to cross the road. A proof of the fact that the Fourier transform is not surjective from $\mathcal{L}^1(\mathbb{R})$ to $C_0( \mathbb{R})$ Let $f_n = \mathbb 1_{[-n,n]}$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$   Compute explicitly $f_n \star f_1$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$.  Show that $f_n \star f_1$ is the Fourier transform of $g_n = \frac{  \sin{(2\pi x)} \sin{(2 \pi nx)}}{\pi ^2 x^2}$  Show that $\| g_n \|_1 \to \infty$  Deduce that the Fourier transform is not surjective from $\mathcal{L}^1(\mathbb{R})$ to $C_0( \mathbb{R})$    Here, $C_0(\mathbb{R})$ is the space of continuous functions $f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ that tends to $0$ at $-\infty$ and $+\infty$. I managed to compute 1) and proved 2). But I don't know how to prove 3). Moreover, I don't see how can 1), 2) and 3) prove 4). Can anyone help? How can I change (or remove / reset ) my name on a site in Stack Exchange network? I have a little problem with the placement of my picture. I want to insert it at the end of the introduction chapter but its place is not where I want.   I think the problem become from the:  \begin{figure} ... \end{figure}   Because when I insert the picture without using \begin{figure}... the picture is at the end of the chapter as I want.   Look the picture below. I have a set of 10 tables and each has an extra column that I don't want. Specifically, these tables are descriptions of database tables exported by phpMyAdmin, and they all have a "MIME" column that I would like to remove. Is there a way to do this other than using string manipulation / find and replace?   I have tried setting the column to p{0in}, but the column title still remains. The USB has various purposes for data transfer, movement of input and output signals for hardware like connecting an Android device to another Display screen (USB on the go), charging the device etc.(during a device charge the voltage drawn from the USB is same irrespective of the device or OEM then Why are two USB Cables different ?  A USB of one manufacturer may not be supporting another manufacturer. We get problems if we do connect them like      or Does there exist a bijective $f:\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ such that $\sum f(n)/n^2$ converges? We know that $\displaystyle\zeta(2)=\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}$ and it converges.        Does there exists a bijective map $f:\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ such that the sum $$\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{f(n)}{n^2}$$ converges.      If our $s=2$ was not fixed, then can we have a function such that $\displaystyle \zeta(s)=\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{f(n)}{n^s}$ converges