Obj roblox file turns grey
.fbx export why there are no materials or textures?
Ubuntu 20.04 graphics driver problem I have upgraded from Ubuntu 19.10 to 20.04, and now I have a problem with my graphics rendering (strange squares on background and font problems). I use the i915 driver. Graphics card: Skylake GT2 HD Graphics 520. I tried to reinstall GNOME shell and Xorg server. Nothing helped. Also Chrome browser breaks on most of pages. Text deselecting when using Logitech mouse scroll wheel in Sierra Why is compactness so important? I've read many times that 'compactness' is such an extremely important and useful concept, though it's still not very apparent why. The only theorems I've seen concerning it are the Heine-Borel theorem, and a proof continuous functions on R from closed subintervals of R are bounded. It seems like such a strange thing to define; why would the fact every open cover admits a finite refinement be so useful? Especially as stating "for every" open cover makes compactness a concept that must be very difficult thing to prove in general - what makes it worth the effort?  If it helps answering, I am about to enter my third year of my undergraduate degree, and came to wonder this upon preliminary reading of introductory topology, where I first found the definition of compactness. Finding the limit of $\left(\frac{n}{n+1}\right)^n$ Make specific author bold using biblatex In single-blind peer-review, can you reveal your identity without the editor's consent? In my field (chemistry), review is always done in a single blind process, i.e. the author does not know who the referees were, but the referees do know who the authors are. In ten years, I have never seen a referee breaching this anonymity, e.g. by signing their review, unless they got prior approval by the editor (in order to continue discuss things further with the authors, once the manuscript was accepted for publication).  So, it seemed logical to assume that in single blind peer-review, the reviewer should not disclose his identity without the editor's consent. Yet, some people have told me ( and ; also IRL a friend from human sciences) that they have seen people sign their reviews, or write emails to them after the review but before the paper is published.  So, in single-blind peer-review, can you reveal your identity without the editor's consent? Does it depends on the customs of each field, or is there a hard rule? (in which case, the few anecdotes I heard were outliers) What does "it" refer to in "it's raining"? I wanted to leave the question title as is so as not to take away from my amusement :).  Anyway,     It's raining.   What is raining? Is it the sky? The clouds? The weather? The rain? What is "it"? Any historical insights on the statement? What is the difference between a deep copy and a shallow copy? What is the difference between a deep copy and a shallow copy? An example to show that convergence of Cesaro sum to $0$ does not imply the original sequence converges to $0$. I'd like construct a non-negative sequence $\{a_{k}\}_{k=0}^{\infty}$ with $a_{0}=0$ such that the Cesaro sum $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_{k}\longrightarrow 0$ but $a_{n}$ does not converge to $0$.   I have a really bad attempt:  Define $a_{0}=a_{1}=0$, and $a_{k}:=\log(\log(k))$ for $k\geq 2$, then $a_{k}\longrightarrow\infty$. But $$\dfrac{1}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_{k}=\dfrac{\log\Big(\prod_{k=2}^{n-1}\log(k)\Big)}{n}$$ and Wolframalpha told me that this series converges to $0$ as $n\longrightarrow\infty$.  However, I have no idea about how to show this convergence to $0$. Also, I wish to have a sequence as simple as possible, since at some stage I need too how $f(k):=a_{k}$ is positive semi-definite.   Is there any simpler example?   Thank you! How to select html nodes by ID with jquery when the id contains a dot? If my html looked like this:  &lt;td class="controlCell"&gt;     &lt;input class="inputText" id="SearchBag.CompanyName" name="SearchBag.CompanyName" type="text" value="" /&gt; &lt;/td&gt;   How could I select #SearchBag.CompanyName with JQuery? I can't get it to work and I fear it's the dot that's breaking it all. The annoying thing is that renaming all my id's would be a lot of work, not to mention the loss in readability.  Note: Please let's not start talking about how tables are not made for lay-outing. I'm very aware of the  and try hard to use it as much as possible. 50 hertz sine wave in oscilloscope when I touch it I bought a new PicoScope USB oscilloscope and noticed that when I touch the tip of the probe with my hand I see a 50&nbsp;Hz signal of 2 volts on the screen. What is causing this? (Or rather, how is the mains 50 Hz sine wave getting through me to the scope?) What LaTeX markup would one have to write to produce a result similar to the image below?    Please excuse my Paint-and-mouse drawing skills. :-) "Duplicate of...[deleted post]" One of the options offered when you right click the desktop or within a Nautilus window is "wipe available diskspace." I'd think that means all unused diskspace but assumptions can be dangerous. I don't want to try it only to find out that available meant "all". I can't remember seeing this option before 12.04.  I was asked to provide an image but unfortunately when right clicking to get the drop down menu, the print screen function doesn't respond thereby making an image impossible.  It appears that no responder so far has actually used this nautilus option. Jorge suggested that the feature was actually nautilus-wipe and I verified that is the case by removing nautilus-wipe and seeing that the menu option is now gone. Documentation for nautilus-wipe is almost non-existent and what little I found was superficial and contradictory. This doesn't leave me with a warm and fuzzy feeling regarding my using an application or feature that purports to "wipe disk" without a clear definition of what is wiped. How many distinct functions can be defined from set A to B? A type of the body is JSON Blob in a form of:  {"key1":"val1";"key2":"val2"}  I wanted to convert it into a Map&lt;String, String&gt;. Do I have to manually deserialize it or there's a class which can handle that? Which stats / gear can get the best our of wasteland exploration? Trying to get the best out of wasteland exploration here! I get it that you'd obviously need a big gun for survival out there, but apart from that, I'm wondering which stats / gear can get the best out of exploration.    How would you choose who to send out exploring from your dwellers. Which stat is the most important to choose explorers? Strength or endurance maybe? Does it make much of a difference equipping combat outfits? If so, whats the most important stat to boost through outfits? What is the behaviour of \fontsize if baselineskip is below a certain value? during my optimization process I found something spurious I cannot explain to myself and which I would like to understand. So with \fontsize you set the fontsize and the baselineskip. However the behaviour of the second paramater is a bit unclear to me, because if you reduce it too much, at a certain point the baselineskip gets bigger again. Let me show you my example: \documentclass[landscape]{article} \usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry} \usepackage{lipsum,multicol}  \begin{document} \begin{multicols}{4}     \fontsize{10}{11}\selectfont     \lipsum[1]     \columnbreak          \fontsize{10}{10}\selectfont     \lipsum[1]     \columnbreak          \fontsize{10}{9}\selectfont     \lipsum[1]     \columnbreak          \fontsize{10}{8}\selectfont     \lipsum[1]     \columnbreak \end{multicols} \end{document}  If you compile this, your result will be looking like this:  Now from the first to the third column it seems logic, that the baselineskip is reduced and hence less space is needed vertically to typeset. But with the third column, even though the baselineskip is reduced even further, it needs more vertical space overall. It is strange however, that for example from line 11 to 12 (starting with tus and lum), the spacing seems to be narrower than in column 3, while in a lot of line the spacing is bigger. Changing the baselineskip to lower values down to 0 does not modify the vertical alignment further. What is the purpose of this behaviour and is it intended? I cannot see a benefit of this and I am a bit confused. Merge pdfs sequentially I would like to merge 4 pdfs, pdf1.pdf, pdf2.pdf, pdf3.pdf pdf4.pdf together so that the pdfs are spliced, i.e. the first page will be the first page of pdf1, the second the first of pdf2, the third the first of pdf3, etc.  The pdf files are with plain images, no table of contents.  How would I accomplish this? It would be nice to do it from Terminal as well. When I'm using rendered viewport it initially takes a while before rendering starts, but once it does, I can freely move around and rendering a new view happens almost instantaneously. When on the other hand I'm rendering a movie, for each frame Blender takes a significant amount of time before rendering even starts, usually doing the following:  Synchronizing object, Updating images, Updating meshes, Updating Scene BVH, Packing BVH,  Why does it do this? And is it possible to disable this to increase movie rendering speed?