How to get the Json format in android
What is a NullPointerException, and how do I fix it?
How to change from csh to bash as default shell I have csh as my default shell, as shown by echo $SHELL. I want to switch to bash as my default shell. I tried the following approaches to no avail:   With chsh I get:  chsh: can only change local entries; use ypchsh instead.  With ypchsh I get:  ypchsh: yppasswdd not running on NIS master host ("dcsun2").    I only have .chsrc in my home directory and I cannot find any .profile files in /etc. How can I change my default shell to bash? Prove the following $A \setminus (B\setminus C) = (A\setminus B)\cap (A \cup C)$ I want to prove the following so I decide to rewrite the RHS  $$A \setminus (B\setminus C) = (A\setminus B)\cap (A \cup C)$$ $$ A\setminus(B\setminus C) = A\setminus (B \cap C^c) = A\cap (B\cap C^c)^c = A\cap(B^c\cup C) = (A\cap B^c)\cup(A\cap C) $$ there is way that $(A\cap B^c)\cup(A\cap C)\rightarrow (A\setminus B)\cup(A\cap C) = (A\setminus B)\cap (A \cup C)$?  thanks. EDIT  LHS: $$x\in A \vee x\in A\cap C \rightarrow x\in A \wedge x\in C$$ RHS: $$x\in A \wedge x\in A\cup C \rightarrow x\in A \vee x\in C$$  how it can help me? How to remove Windows 10 from Windows Boot Manager after uninstalling it? I installed Windows 7 on one partition and formatted the other where I had Windows 10 installed leaving only that one Windows 7 OS on my drive, but I still have two OSs offered in Windows Boot Manager. What is even weirder is that their names are reversed, when I choose Windows 10, it's Windows 7 that gets loaded. How do I install Java? Integral representation $B_T^3$ I have to find a $F_t$ such that $B_T^3=E[B_T^3]+\int_0^T F_t dB_t$. I have shown by ito formula that $B_T^3=\int_0^T 3 B_s^2 dB_s+\int_0^T 3 B_s ds$. Could you please help me? Converting a list of tuples into a dict I have a list of tuples like this:  [ ('a', 1), ('a', 2), ('a', 3), ('b', 1), ('b', 2), ('c', 1), ]   I want to iterate through this keying by the first item, so, for example, I could print something like this:  a 1 2 3 b 1 2 c 1   How would I go about doing this without keeping an item to track whether the first item is the same as I loop around the tuples? This feels rather messy (plus I have to sort the list to start with)... I was wondering if there is a simpler way to find the last to digits of a power such as $3^{45}$. I reduced it modulo 100 to get the answer, which is 43. But I was curious if there was a simpler, or more eloquent way to get this result.  Here's my method:  Using the fact that $3^4=81\equiv -19 \pmod{100}$ and $19^5=2,476,099\equiv -1 \pmod{100}$  $$ 3^{45}\equiv 3(3^4)^{11}\equiv 3(-19)^{11}\equiv 3(-19)(19^5)^2\equiv 3(-19)(-1)^2 \equiv -57 \equiv 43 \pmod {100} $$  I just felt like this was sort of a messy way to find out that the last two digits are 43. I have an existing windows application, for which I have decided to create a Mac version. The problem is that the current UI involves a lot of buttons, tabbed panels, multiple windows etc.  This UI had been rated as intuitive and easy to use and straightforward  by many customers and editors. But a beginner (very less experience) may find in confusing a little, but it has been complemented with tutorial.      When creating the Macintosh variant, should I focus on creating a simplified and minimalistic UI (this does not mean the current UI is complex, but I think Mac user's prefer a simple UI right?) or should I try to copy the exact same thing?  By reducing the UI some of the features may be missing. But it can be added later if needed. Should I focus on a fresh approach (this is easier rather than copying the complex UI pattern) or should I go with the old recognized setup? I have unistalled and reinstalled the Ubuntu Software Center as per info I found in a similar thread and I got the same response about line 91 or something like that.  I just tried to upload a screen shot but since I'm new it won't allow me to.  I also can not figure out how to cut and paste anything so I have to hand type what the error screen says, both when I attempt to open the software center and nothing happens, when I try to enter commands into the terminal to uninstall, reinstall, whatever I get the same following:  COULD NOT INTITIALIZE THE PACKAGE INFORMATION An unresolvable problem occured while initializing the package information Please report t:his bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the following error message: 'E: Malformed line 91 in source list/etc/apt/sources.list (dist parse)  E: The list of sources could not be read.,  E: The package list of status file could not be parsed or opened.   How do I report bugs?  What can be done about this.  I have searched and everything everyone says to do leads me back to the same line error message.  So, I don't know how to get to line 91 in the source list; to tell you what it says. Sorry, I'm really new to this. That is what I need is to find out how to get there and fix what it says. I would really like to NOT have to re partition my hard drive and start from scratch, so I'm really looking forward to getting this problem solved. I need to be able to install new software. Mathematica not plotting whole logarithmic function Is it possible to add new predictions/autofill in Overleaf? For example, when I use the command (in Overleaf/ShareLaTex):  \begin{figure}[H]     \centering     \includegraphics{some_graphic}     \caption{some_caption}     \label{fig:some_label} \end{figure}   the \includegraphics{} comes without the [] parameter to change the size of the image, and \begin{figure} without the [H] option by default.   Is it possible to renew the command to make it default? By that I mean that when I type the \begin{figure} command it adds the [H] and [h] as well as [width=\textwidth] in the \includegraphics command, rather than making a global change in the preamble e.g. Ralink MT7601U (148f:7601) Wi-Fi adapter installation I am trying to install a Ralink wifi adapter in Ubuntu Desktop 14.04.  The system is not detecting the wifi.   lsusb lists the device as:  Bus 002 Device 004: ID 148f:7601 Ralink Technology, Corp.  I have the rt2800 USB driver listed in "/etc/modules"; Following some instructions on the web, I tried this command:  echo 148F 7601 | sudo tee /sys/bus/usb/drivers/rt2800usb/new_i  lsmod | grep rt2800 returns the following:  rt2800usb              26581  0  rt2x00usb              20041  1 rt2800usb rt2800lib              83150  1 rt2800usb rt2x00lib              48886  3 rt2x00usb,rt2800lib,rt2800usb mac80211              545990  3 rt2x00lib,rt2x00usb,rt2800lib crc_ccitt              12627  1 rt2800lib Uniform vs discrete Gaussian sampling in Ring learning with errors The Wikipedia article on  mentions two methods of sampling "small" polynomials namely uniform sampling and discrete Gaussian sampling. Uniform sampling is clearly the simplest, involving simply uniformly selecting the coefficients from the set of small coefficients, thereby guaranteeing they will be small. However, the articles mention that security proofs rely on discrete Gaussian sampling.  However, I have a bit of difficulty wrapping my head around    Why discrete Gaussian sampling would be better than uniform, security-wise?   I mean, usually uniform is preferable - it maximizes the entropy/information in each sample, making the outcome more unpredictable. I could understand it if the Gaussian sampling technique would somehow serve to avoid (at least with high probability) "weak" parts of the space of outcomes but I have found no information/justification that this is the case.  Another reason I can see why discrete Gaussian might be better is that there is, after all, a chance (albeit a small one) one would select a non-small coefficient, so the space of outcomes is actually larger. However, given that this probability of hitting this extra space is (by design) quite small but also that one would likely immediately reject such a sample (because the algorithm calls for a small polynomial), this seems to be irrelevant.  It is not because I am against discrete Gaussian sampling I just want to understand why it is more secure. Also, I want to understand if it really IS more secure or it is simply easier to prove security in that model. I would actually consider that very interesting if it is the case because it raises the question of why is it easier to prove the security under conditions that are intuitively worse (i.e. discrete Gaussian vs the intuitively better uniform case)? If it is so intuitively clear that uniform sampling is better, surely it must be possible to transform that intuition into a security proof of RWE also under uniform sampling. Otherwise, I would fear the intuition must with high likelihood be wrong or at least dubious. Is it possible to recover an email that has been clicked "delete forever" in the trash folder? How do they express the time, in American and British English? I don't know if this is a good question. But as far as I know, and as I do it, American English also say "after" other than "past" in expressing times.   For example, a quarter after six instead of, a quarter past six as in British English.  The other difference I know, so far, is that the British use dots to separate "hour" and "minute" in digital times like "08.35" while Americans use a colon e.g; "08:35".  So is what I know, so far, correct? Or are there any other differences that I don't know about? Deleting external/auxiliary files? Correcting projection of 360° content onto a sphere - distortion at the poles I'm using the Autopano Giga 4.4 and Autopano Video Pro 2.6 to stitch and create spherical content, but I've recently moved into wanting to create 360° tours via Unity. I know this is partly a developers question, but if anyone out there can help me with the right specs for exporting a spherical image or video from Giga to use to create the image for the inside of the sphere on Unity, I'd appreciate it!  Experimenting with Premiere and FCPX to edit highlight reels of spherical content, I've had seamless experiences created. For some reason in Unity, the images appear to be stretched around the sphere wrong and it's creates issues on the top and bottom of the image:    The image shown is the bottom of the sphere. I'm using the Android platform to hopefully turn these tours into apps when completed. Thank you for any help! How is momentum conserved in this example? Diminishing returns / non-linear reputation from “great” answers Over time I realized a very annoying property of the Stack Overflow reputation system: Easy answers to popular question are rewarded with a lot more reputation points than actually great answers. In case anybody actually needs examples for this, here are two examples from :   gained me 420 rep, I invested 2 minutes writing it, and it only was a wild guess.   took me about an hour for the research and the math and gained me 40 rep.  Now I know that you are bound to get more rep for answers that are useful to more people, and I'd say that's fine. But the current situation is quite extreme: 30% of my reputation is from 5 of my 330 answers, and they are definitely far from being my best ones.  A final example that is not from my profile, but more extreme: Do you really think  is worth 40000 reputation?  My proposition to improve that situation would be to make the reputation gain from a single answer non-linear, maybe even have it capped at a certain point. I'm not sure on how that non-linear function should look exactly, and would leave good proposals for that to users with more experience than me. "can't" versus "couldn't", what is the difference? That can't be Obama at the door, it's too early.  That couldn't be Obama at the door, it's too early.    What is the difference between them? Are they almost the same?