Adding button zoom to map using OpenLayers 3?
Zoom in/out on click in OpenLayers 3?
$\epsilon$ undefined using Minion Pro with pdftex I'm using MiKTeX 2.9 and have recently installed the Minion Pro fonts for use with pdftex. I followed the instructions available on  to install them.  Everything works as expected, but in place of the Greek letter epsilon I get a box with a cross (see below), and the following warning:    I found the issue was reported , but I still can't fix it. xelatex works fine, but I'd like to to stick to pdftex so I can use microtype.  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{MinionPro}  \begin{document}  Text here. $\epsilon$  \end{document}       UPDATE: a set of instructions for the installation of the up-to-date FontPro scripts with MiKTeX can be found . Hamiltonian Cycle Problem At the moment I'm trying to prove the statement:     $K_n$ is an edge disjoint union of Hamiltonian cycles when $n$ is odd.   ($K_n$ is the complete graph with $n$ vertices)  So far, I think I've come up with a proof. We know the total number of edges in $K_n$ is $n(n-1)/2$ (or $n \choose 2$) and we can split our graph into individual Hamiltonian cycles of degree 2.   We also know that for n vertices all having degree 2, there must consequently be $n$ edges. Thus we write $n(n-1)/2 = n + n + ... n$ (here I'm just splitting $K_n$'s edges into some number of distinct Hamiltonian paths) and the deduction that $n$ must be odd follows easily.  However, the assumption I made - that we can always split $K_n$ into Hamiltonian paths of degree 2 if $K_n$ can be written as a disjoint union described above - I'm having trouble proving. I've only relied on trying different values for $n$ trials and it hasn't faltered yet. So, I'm asking:     If it is true, how do you prove that if $K_n$ can be split into distinct Hamiltonian cycles, it can be split in such a way that each Hamiltonian cycle is of degree 2? Windows 10 has an extensive collection of lock screen photos, many of which have  here on Travel.SE.  Is there a website which lists the location of all of these photos? I imagine Microsoft has purchased an official license, so they should have a record about the photographer and the place where the photo was taken. How much should a "button of Cure Light Wounds" cost (should it be available at all?) What can I do when getting "We are no longer accepting questions/answers from this account"? If you are reading this, you may have been affected by one of our post quality bans. If so, it is important that you  to understand what has happened and how to regain the permissions that you lost. While trying to ask a question, one could see:  We are no longer accepting questions from this account. See  to learn more.  Likewise, for answers:  We are no longer accepting answers from this account. See  to learn more.   Why am I getting this message? Are deleted posts taken into account too? Is a question/answer ban the same as a suspension? How do I avoid getting a question ban? How long do I have to wait before I can post again? What can I do to release the ban? How can I reactivate my account? Can I simply create a new account? I'll just ask somewhere else on the SE network, and they'll migrate my question to the correct site! Will a ban on one Stack Exchange site affect my standing on other sites in the network? Does this apply to meta sites too? My account is in good standing. Why am I still blocked? Login SSH with .ppk file on Ubuntu Terminal I have a production server. To login to the server I must use a .ppk file.  How to login with Ubuntu Terminal and .ppk file?  I tried this :  ssh -i location/file.ppk username@server-ip   but it is showing an error message. Groups of order $pq$ without using Sylow theorems If $|G| = pq$,  $p,q$ primes, $p \gt q, q \nmid p-1 $, then how do I prove $G$ is cyclic without using Sylow's theorems? Is it wasteful to use a heating element, instead of doing useful work? Consider a computer CPU consuming electrical energy to perform calculations and consequently emitting heat.  Assumption: That a CPU consuming x Watts of power, emits the same amount of heat as an incandescent heating element which consumes the same amount of power.  The rest of the question assumes that this is true: the energy has to go somewhere, and I can't see that the outcome of the calculations counts as "somewhere".  I've long repeated the claim that "wasteful" appliances such as incandescent lightbulbs, over-full kettles, computers left running, etc. are not wasting power if we make the assumptions:   the appliance is in a room which we aim to maintain at above a certain temperature, warmer than the external temperature (cf a home in winter) the room leaks heat to the outside faster than the "wasteful" appliances emit heat. the room contains an electric heater the electric heater is regulated by a thermostat   In these circumstances, I think (?), if a light bulb produces excess heat, its only effect is to cause the thermostat to switch off sooner, so what energy you've "wasted" in the light bulb, is "saved" at the heater.  I don't think that's controversial.  But my question is:   If a CPU does useful work, and emits all the input energy as heat as a side effect But a heating element emits the same heat, without doing useful work Is it therefore wasteful to use heating elements? Is it more efficient to (for example) run  on a CPU, to get "free" computation as a side-effect of heating?   One reason to heat a room with a heating element, rather than with CPUs, is that the heating element is much cheaper to produce. But ignoring the initial cost of the hardware, would a "heater" made out of 20 CPUs, each running at full capacity and consuming 50W each, output less thermal heat than a 1KW element that does nothing else useful?  To be useful, of course, the CPUs would need to output the result of their computations, which would account for a tiny amount of energy. Let's assume that's negligible.  I'm sure there's a flaw in there somewhere; probably that the assumption above is false. What have I missed? Show that   $$\displaystyle1 - \frac{x^2}2\leq\cos x\quad\forall x \in \mathbb{R}$$   Let $f(x) = \cos x - 1 + \frac{x^2}2$; then we need to show that $f(x) \geq 0\quad\forall x \in \mathbb{R}$.  Since $$\lim_{x \to \pm\infty} f(x) = +\infty$$ and $$\operatorname{im}f'' = [0, 2]$$ (as $f''(x) = 1 -\cos x$), it remains to show that $x = 0$ is a minimum for $f(x)$, but I cannot do that because I would need to solve $f'(x) = x -\sin x = 0$, which I cannot. I think it would suffice to show that plugging in $x = 0$ we have that $f'(x) = 0$, and combining it with the fact that the function $f$ is convex, we would be done.    Is it enough? What's a better proof?  EDIT: It just occurred to me that there is a way to solve $f'(x) = 0$. Just observe that $f'(x)$ is an odd function and that $f''(x) \geq 0$ implies that $f'(x)$ is monotonically increasing. Since an odd function, if defined at $x = 0$, must be $0$ there, $x = 0$ is a solution to the equation and it's the only one. Please add TeX rendering in titles on the iOS app How can I reverse (flip horizontal) a table? Remember all opened files with split windows and their positions in Emacs check the availability of the WCF Web Service I want to check the availability of the WCF web service i.c service is up or down through  the C# code. How to achieve that? What is syntax highlighting and how does it work? How do we know photons have spin 1? Why do different humans look different? Although farmers appear to be able to tell their cows apart, cows look very much alike to me. And this similarity in appearance seems to be a general trait across the animal kingdom: one individual of one animal species looks much like another.  Why do human facial and body shapes vary so much?  I understand that human beings live in many different environments (e.g. hot and cold) and have adapted to these (e.g. through lighter or darker skin color), but there seems to be much variation that has no apparent evolutionary purpose. So does the difference have a purpose in itself? That is, did we evlove to vary in appearance, and what is the purpose of this variation? I have a very long equation that must be separated into two lines, and it has several pairs of nesting \left \right delimiters. Unfortunately, it seems that they need to be on the same line in order for them to work.  Also I'm using the align environment because I need the aligning functionality. Is there a way to have the size of delimiters automatically adjusted over multiple lines? How do I contact other users? How can I contact another user, if that user has not specified any contact details in their profile? What do ellipsis [...] mean in a list? Increasing the size of tyres on a hybrid We are planning on doing some mountain biking in a few weeks time and we'd like to get some wider tyres for my wife's hybrid. I know there are similar questions and answers out there on this topic, but I need some specific help to make sure I buy the right tyres.  The bike is a Ladies Scott Sportster 50 2015, the best website I could find with a fairly accurate spec is     It's currently got Kenda K-180 700 x 38c / 30TPI tyres on it, which are fairly good all rounders and capable of running on clean forest paths but I don't think they would handle anything heavier.  It's got disk brakes so there isn't a clearance issue there, but I have noticed the frame is generally narrower than true MTBs, here are some photos i took of it.    Has anyone put larger, knobblier tyres on this kind of hybrid? whats the largest I can get away with? - I'm also slightly confused by all the tyre sizing, I'm sure someone told me this is a 27.5" tyre, but 700 seems to mean 29" on a lot of websites.  Any advice is very much appreciated, Thanks.