Unable to access CSV file using linked server using any login other than 'sa'
SQL Server Linked Server to Microsoft Access
How to get a DOM Element from a jQuery selector? In a family with two children, what are the chances, if one of the children is a girl, that both children are girls? In a family with two children, what are the chances, if one of the children is a girl, that both children are girls?  I just dipped into a book, The Drunkard's Walk - How Randomness Rules Our Lives, by Leonard Mlodinow, Vintage Books, 2008. On p.107 Mlodinow says the chances are 1 in 3.   It seems obvious to me that the chances are 1 in 2. Am I correct? Is this not exactly analogous to having a bowl with an infinite number of marbles, half black and half red? Without looking I draw out a black marble. The probability of the second marble I draw being black is 1/2. I am a Physics undergrad, and just started studying Topology. How do you define neighborhood and open set in Topology.Wikipedia gives a circular definition.   An  is defined as follows.      In topology, a set  is called an open set if it is a neighborhood of every point    While a  is defined as follows:     If $X$ is a topological space and $p$ is a point in $X$, a neighbourhood of $p$ is a subset $V$ of $X$, which includes an open set $U$ containing $p$   which itself contains the term open set.  How do you define it exactly? Which is correct, "neither is" or "neither are"? I know that there is a precise solution of the equations:  \begin{align}     x + a &amp; = 0 \\     x^2 + a\cdot x + b &amp; = 0 \\     x^3 + a\cdot x^2 + b\cdot x + c &amp; = 0 \\     x^4 + a\cdot x^3 + b\cdot x^2 + c\cdot x + d &amp; = 0 \end{align}  Why there is no solutions for equation of degree $\ge 5$? Why does stdafx.h work the way it does? As usual, when my brain's messing with something I can't figure out myself, I come to you guys for help :)  This time I've been wondering why stdafx.h works the way it does? To my understanding it does 2 things:   Includes standard headers which we might (?) use and which are rarely changed Work as a compiler-bookmark for when code is no longer precompiled.   Now, these 2 things seems like two very different tasks to me, and I wonder why they didn't do two seperate steps to take care of them? To me it seems reasonable to have a #pragma-command do the bookmarking stuff and to optionally have a header-file a long the lines of windows.h to do the including of often-used headers... Which brings me to my next point: Why are we forced to include often-used headers through stdafx.h? Personally, I'm not aware of any often used headers I use that I'm not already doing my own includes for - but maybe these headers are necessary for .dll generation?  Thx in advance Motivating the ansatz for the infinitesimal translation operator SEO preference: does a site with WWW rank better than without WWW? After having read various articles on this site about WWW or Non-WWW website setup, ,  and , and after having setup a correct redirection rule in .Htaccess to at least eliminate duplicate contents (currently the non-www solution (e.g. http://example.com) I have a feeling that my site rank less since I changed this.   My confusion was strengthened by these two opponents:     &amp;     Could the change of www.example.com >> http://example.com have a factual impact on ranking?  say either is better or worse. Are they holding information back?  I am confused fellow folks...  As much as I would like to separate facts from fiction, I am aware that not all the good valid information is written. Not on google webmaster site and perhaps not elsewhere. If so it seems out of date!  Does or does not a WWW domain impact SEO/rank better than its NON-WWW version? (Given that you have setup a proper redirect to avoid duplicates and go with one) Firefox fails to update due to corrupted download (deb)  Preparing to unpack .../firefox_32.0+build1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1_i386.deb ... Unpacking firefox (32.0+build1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1) over (31.0+build1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1) ... dpkg-deb (subprocess): decompressing archive member: lzma error:  compressed data is corrupt dpkg-deb: error: subprocess &lt;decompress&gt; returned error exit status 2 dpkg: error processing archive  /var/cache/apt/archives/firefox_32.0+build1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1_i386.deb (--unpack):  cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so' to '/usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so.dpkg-new':   unexpected end of file or stream Please restart all running instances of firefox, or you will experience problems. First, my understanding is that the long-term capital gains tax rate is 0% for those whose marginal rate on ordinary income is 10% or 15%, and (ignoring the highest 39.6% bracket) the rate is 15% for everyone else. (See  and .)  My interest is in what happens at the crucial break between the 15% and 25% bracket, which is $73,800 for married/joint returns in 2013 (and presumably will be higher in 2014, though I haven't been able to find out what that is or if it has even been set yet). Let's say a household has $64,000 in wage income, and sells stock for a $10,000 profit.   Does their income for the purposes of establishing their tax bracket go to $74,000? If so, is the entire $10,000 profit subject to the 15% long-term capital gains rate? Is any part of the wage income subject to the higher marginal tax rate?   Since the amount of income subject to the higher marginal rate is, well, marginal, part 3 seems somewhat less important than part 2. The real issue is whether the capital gains rate hits the entire profit, since, in that case, it seems the household should only sell enough stock to generate a $9000 profit, and sell the remainder in a future year. This is the command I entered in the command block: testfor @p {Inventory:[{id:minecraft:diamond,Count:10}]}  But it doesn't seem to work. What am I doing wrong? Why does an overridden function in the derived class hide other overloads of the base class? Challenges with Key with Gaps? Cleaning wax and pesticide from apple skin I love apples. I like to eat them with skin as it has plenty of fiber in the skin. But apples are famous for wax and pesticides on the skin which I don’t want to ingest. I have read many articles on the web and suggestions for removing the wax from the surface.   These suggestions include soaking in vinegar or hot water and other methods. They suggest that soaking apples in vinegar removes the wax that can be seen in the vinegar. I have done that, but never seen any residue of wax in the vinegar.   So I have set aside a new kitchen sink Scotch-Brite scrubber for this purpose and been scrubbing the apple skin under running water before eating. I think this method should remove most of the wax and pesticides. I would like to hear your input. Cannot get specific WMS to display in Leaflet or OpenLayers 3 How to check if a row exists in MySQL? (i.e. check if an email exists in MySQL) Sort an array without rewriting a key How can I filter items with a certain enchantement? I am trying to build a custom Adventure Island. At this moment I am trying to limit the allowed items on this island. I'm trying to do this by filtering on a certain enchantment which is not item-specific.  For example.   When you want to filter an wooden sword with a custom name, you use this command:  /testfor @p[r=5] {Inventory:[{tag:{display:{Name:"Custom Sword"}}}]} &lt;   When you want to filter a wooden sword with a custom name and specific enchantement, you can use:  /testfor @p[r=5] {Inventory:[{tag:{display:{Name:"Custom Sword"},ench:[{id:16,lvl:1}]}}]} &lt;   But how can I filter on items with a specific enchantment on ANY item? I tried:  /testfor @p[r=5] {Inventory:[{tag:{ench:[{id:16,lvl:1}]}}]} &lt;   But this ain't work. Does anyone know how to solve this issue? I was presented with the following problem:      Prove that there exist solutions to $x^2+y^2=z^n$ for all $n$, with $x,y,z, n \in \mathbb{N}$   I showed that by taking any Pythagorean triple $x^2+y^2=z^2$ and multiplying by $z^{2(n-1)}$ we get $(z^{n-1}x)^2+(z^{n-1}y)^2=(z^2)^n$, which allows me to generate solutions easily for any value of $n$. I managed to find several similar questions on this site, such as  concerning the specific case $n=3$. I notice that all of these questions take a similar approach and start with a Pythagorean triple and use it to generate general solutions.  Is there a way to prove the statement (or better yet provide solutions to the equation) without first relying on Pythagoras? We know the escape velocity from the Earth is 11.2km/s. Isn't it the velocity required to escape from earth if we go normal to the surface of earth? i.e while we derive the formula for the escape velocity from earth we never consider the slanted motion of the object. So when we launch a rocket we need to use very less value of velocity compare to escape velocity to escape from earth because rocket follows a slanted path so curvature of earth has an effect?  If what I said above is right, then how we can say escape velocity is 11.2 km/s?