Can a replicator de-replicate?
What do they do with all the plates and cups in Star Trek?
How can we improve the inconsistent tagging of the questions relating to the recent uproar and associated issues? Question description  There are many questions (~250 in the last five weeks) relating to      sometimes they are about licensing, legal issues, , , , etc.  These questions relate to the same growing polarization between community and Stack&nbsp;Exchange staff. But, it is not easy to search or filter them because the tags are not uniform for those questions, they do not have the same tags.  Could we group all these posts together by some common tag (new or not)? (in addition, maybe we should create less of these questions, they tend to become noise now, water down the core message, and it is ).    Relevance  Overview of current tags (aside from the discussion tag) for the first ten  (           ) questions relating to  (ordered by relevance)                              1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10     moderators              x           x   x   x     community               x           x   x     etiquette                   x     users                       x     company                     x     moderation                      x     code-of-conduct                     x       x       x     deleted-questions                               x     legal                                                   x   These tags are obviously not the same while it is arguably the same topic (it is even for the same, specific, search term) .  Instead of using multiple searches one might wish to control tracking these question by adding some single relevant tag to watched tags or ignore tags. But, this is difficult when they do not use the same tag. And in the case of ignoring one might ignore too much when the tag is not specific.  Another indicator that these posts need consistent tagging is the fact that there exist highly upvoted answers that function as an archive for these questions (see  and ). But it is only a hack/workaround for the absence of a common tag; they are not an optimal solution.    Why now?  In an older question () it was suggested to create a specific tag. That was rejected at that point. But, now we are several weeks, and many many questions, further. The situation is more escalated than what might have foreseen at that point. The overview becomes a mess and something needs to be done.  See the bump in the image below which indicates that something is 'going on' and it entails a large fraction of the current post. (obtained from ) I often cook fries in a skillet. I put about 1/4 cup vegetable oil into a large skillet and heat on high, then I toss in some frozen fries.   As soon as I toss them in there is an explosion of grease that makes a huge mess. After it simmers down though, I can cook the fries without spilling anymore grease.  Is there anyway to avoid the initial uproar? can we have a parallel earth made of dark matter? Why bosons have integer spin and fermions have half-integer ones? Due the fact that the fermions are the "block particles" and the bosons are the "carriers" I just came out with the question that, why the "block particle" have half-integer spin and the "carriers" have an integer spin? When it comes to , I often read recommendations like "Use adb logcat to find some more details". Looking for a good way to backup all my apps including their data,  refers to adb backup and adb restore. In several places one can find ways to remotely do on an Android device with the use of , such as transferring files using adb push or adb pull, accessing the  via adb shell, and more. So ADB seems to be a good thing to have for an Android user.  But how to get this "ADB thingy" on my computer? Not being a developer, installing the entire  seems a bit overkill. Is there a more minimalistic approach available? My 3-month-old son has started sleeping through the night, with a vengeance. He sleeps for hours. And when he finally wakes up and I expect him to be starving, he's often still ready to happily play for a bit - say 1/2 hour to 45 min. Now, I know this isn't such normal behavior for a 3-month-old, and I'm definitely appreciating having my nights back, but I'm also a bit concerned - how long is the longest I should let him go without eating?  Edit (more details):  I used to try to stretch him and make his last feeding right before I went to sleep, so that I could take full advantage of his sleep-time. So we used to put him to bed about 12:30-1:00, and then head to sleep ourselves. He started off going about 6-7 hours... But a couple of weeks ago he started sleeping longer, and longer, and longer... Now he goes nearly 12 hours. He'll go to sleep at 12:30 AM and wake up at 12 PM or later. And he'll then happily play for another half hour, making about 12 hours of no-eating. I generally trust that I can rely on him to tell me when he's hungry, but I was wondering if there's a limit to how long I can let him go without eating... Is it a good practice to show a sign-up or registration form as seperate parts rather than in one go? I am designing a registration form for a site with multiple sets of information required from the user. I have categorized the data fields into relevant groups. Now should I present the form sections in one go or follow a wizard-like approach? What things should I keep in mind while deciding on this? Children’s books, one in space setting, the other in a jungle When I was little I remember getting these two books from the library.  Both books were paperback and flimsy.  The pages were wide.  Each book had full page illustrations with puzzles and mazes in them, but it was like you were immersed in this setting completely.  They were also like choose-your-own adventure books, but only in the way that you go through the book in a different order based on your results in the puzzles/games.    For example, there is a bridge to cross, or you can take this path.  If you choose to cross the bridge you go to page x.  On page x you have to pretend to cross the bridge but some planks are broken.  You can't skip more than a certain number of planks, but you also cannot "step" on a broken plank.  One book was in a jungle setting with rope bridges, alligators, quick sand, etc. The other was in space, with all kinds of aliens and weird stuff.  I have faint memories of these books but I REALLY want to track them down because I remember loving them. I'm looking for the fastest way to determine if a long value is a perfect square (i.e. its square root is another integer):    I've done it the easy way, by using the built-in  function, but I'm wondering if there is a way to do it faster by restricting yourself to integer-only domain. Maintaining a lookup table is impractical (since there are about 231.5 integers whose square is less than 263).   Here is the very simple and straightforward way I'm doing it now:  public final static boolean isPerfectSquare(long n) {   if (n &lt; 0)     return false;    long tst = (long)(Math.sqrt(n) + 0.5);   return tst*tst == n; }   Note: I'm using this function in many  problems.  So no one else will ever have to maintain this code.  And this kind of micro-optimization could actually make a difference, since part of the challenge is to do every algorithm in less than a minute, and this function will need to be called millions of times in some problems.    I've tried the different solutions to the problem:   After exhaustive testing, I found that adding 0.5 to the result of Math.sqrt() is not necessary, at least not on my machine. The  was faster, but it gave incorrect results for n >= 410881.  However, as suggested by , we can use the FISR hack for n &lt; 410881. Newton's method was a good bit slower than Math.sqrt().  This is probably because Math.sqrt() uses something similar to Newton's Method, but implemented in the hardware so it's much faster than in Java.  Also, Newton's Method still required use of doubles. A modified Newton's method, which used a few tricks so that only integer math was involved, required some hacks to avoid overflow (I want this function to work with all positive 64-bit signed integers), and it was still slower than Math.sqrt(). Binary chop was even slower.  This makes sense because the binary chop will on average require 16 passes to find the square root of a 64-bit number. According to John's tests, using or statements is faster in C++ than using a switch, but in Java and C# there appears to be no difference between or and switch. I also tried making a lookup table (as a private static array of 64 boolean values).  Then instead of either switch or or statement, I would just say if(lookup[(int)(n&amp;0x3F)]) { test } else return false;.  To my surprise, this was (just slightly) slower. This is because . How do I center a container in my HTML/CSS? Normalising Constant for exponentiated function What would the normalising  constant be of the following, or atleast an approximation? I would like to avoid sampling.  $$f(\theta)=\exp(-k_1e^{-k_2\theta^2}-\theta^2)\qquad\theta\in(-\infty,\infty), \quad k_1,k_2&gt;0$$  In the event that its not possible, what would be a valid polynomial lower bound on $\log(f(\theta))$, that would take into account $k_1$  For anyone, who is interested, I end up with this expresssion because I place a Gaussian prior over (a squared exponential) kernel parameters, and trying to use variational bayes (hence, a lower bound). Can there be a notification for those people that participated in the question in the past (either who asked or answered it) once a bounty is started on it? What is the meaning of this "let there be light" joke? How can I control HDD spin down time? I have 2 HDDs in my PC. Ubuntu is turning off the secondary HDD very quickly after about 15 minutes, which is short for me. I need to control this time. How can I do it?  I tried GNOME power management but did not find it useful. For $q, p$ odd primes such that $p \neq q$, there is not primitive root modulo $pq$. Electric circuits in TeX, LaTeX, and Friends What are some ways to draw electric circuits in TeX systems?  I'm making this community wiki since I haven't found a question related to this.  I was thinking along the lines of . What do you think of that? Other examples are more than welcome, of course. What Is Energy? Where did it come from? The simplistic undergrad explanation aside, I've never really understood what energy really is. I've been told that it's something when converted from one kind of something to another kind, or does some "work", as defined by us, but what is that something?  Moreover, if the total amount of energy in the universe is finite and we cannot create energy. Then, where did it come from? I've learned from thermodynamics where it goes, but where does it come from?  I know this sounds like something trivially simple, but there is so much going on in the physical universe and I just can't grasp what it is. Maybe it is because I lack the mathematical understanding that I can't grasp the subtle things the universe is doing. Still, I want to understand what it is doing.  How do I get to the point of understanding what it's doing?  (Note: What prompted me to ask this was . I'm afraid that it just puzzled me further and I sat there staring at the screen for a good 10 minutes.) Does Airplane Mode allow GPS location to pass through? This is what I saw when my plane was taxing to the runway at CDG:     Airplane mode was on and all other transmissions (except Location), including WiFi, mobile data, NFC and Bluetooth were off.  Location was not manually turned on by me, after I enabled Airplane Mode. It remained turned on.  What am I missing? Is GPS now so widely accepted on-board planes that Android changed its configuration to let this kind of signal/communication to pass through Airplane mode "block"?  I believe that  isn't a duplicate, because at that time (2016) Location was generally "included" in Airplane mode and was turned off by enabling it. It would be nice if backticked code in question titles were rendered the same way they are in question bodies. Since there are so many questions with code in them I feel it would be a big plus. .  This would look a lot nicer in listings and on the page itself if the code strings were rendered as such.  Similar ideas discussed . What is the iPod touch's screen sensitive to?