Cant install anything in termux using ubuntus root access terminal too install pkg from github that require root
Package dbus is not configured yet
Suppose that $f$ is holomorphic on $\mathbb C$ and that $\Re(f(z))\ge 0$ for all $z$. Show that $f$ is constant. [Hint: consider $e^{−f(z)}$.]   My thoughts: If $\Re(f(z))\ge 0 $ holds, then $e^{−f(z)}$ is a bounded holomorphic function (do I need to prove this or is it obvious?) So then by Liouville's Theorem $e^{−f(z)}$ is constant.   But then I'm not sure how to rigorously go from this $\exp(−f(z))$ back to $f(z)$.   Could anyone help me piece this together please?  Thanks Is it possible to wipe an entire iCloud Photo Library? I've been using the beta iCloud Photo Library for a week and a bunch of photos got duplicated and I'd like to wipe all the photos out and start over.  I have backups of all the photos and have turned off iPhoto Cloud Library on all iOS devices. When I log into the web app - it still shows dozens of albums and I can delete all the photos, then go to deleted items and then purge them, but the ghost albums are still there messing things up.  I've turned off the library entirely and you can see there is a 30 day waiting period.     If I click on albums, there are pages of them and no delete button anywhere. If I turn on the library on an iOS device, data starts flooding back as if I wanted to recover the photos.  I don't want to recover anything, I want a clean wipe and clean slate.  Currently, there are 7807 photos in the deleted album and no way to mass delete them. I have 31 albums that show up in iCloud and no way to delete them.  Is there some way to accelerate this or must people wait a month for a corrupt library to eventually be purged to start over?  (I have tickets open with AppleCare after  and it's escalated to engineering, but I was informed that it might be a week or two before it gets seen :-( Perhaps someone has a better idea to clear things out or noticed something I've missed.) Why couldn't the Jedi detect Senator Palpatine as having powers? In Return of the Jedi, when trying to sneak into the base on a shuttle, Luke said he senses Darth Vader's presence and said he shouldn't have come lest he jeopardize the mission. Darth Vader also sensed Luke, but let him in anyways. Also, Yoda and Obi-Wan could detect the Force in young Anakin.  So if Jedi and Sith can detect each other, why couldn't they detect Senator Palpatine to begin with? It seems like a giant plot hole. Picture rotation Is there a way to quickly rotate a picture in the SE editor without saving it on disk and rotating it in some image tool and reuploading it?  E.g. consider the picture below, assume I would like to quickly rotate it 90 degrees and wanted to do it expressly in the editor without the drudgery of saving it on disk, is there a shortcut in the stack exchange &quot;markup language&quot;?  If this feature is not available, I would like to nominate it for implementation. Finding the limit of $\frac{Q(n)}{P(n)}$ where $Q,P$ are polynomials Suppose that $$Q(x)=a_{n}x^{n}+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_{1}x+a_{0} $$and $$P(x)=b_{m}x^{m}+b_{m-1}x^{m-1}+\cdots+b_{1}x+b_{0}.$$ How do I find $$\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{Q(x)}{P(x)}$$ and what does the sequence $$\frac{Q(k)}{P(k)}$$ converge to?  For example, how would I find what the sequence $$\frac{8k^2+2k-100}{3k^2+2k+1}$$ converges to?  Or what is $$\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{3x+5}{-2x+9}?$$   This is being asked in an effort to cut down on duplicates, see here: Coping with  duplicate questions.  and here: . How to sandbox applications? I want to run small untrusted programs, but restrict them from accessing any files outside of their folder, network access, and everything else that they don't really need. What is the simplest way to achieve this? Why does the Moon not revolve around the Sun directly? The sun pulls on the moon with a force that is more than twice the magnitude of the force with which the earth attracts the moon. Why, then, doesn’t the sun take the moon away from the earth? ToolStrip sometimes not responding to a mouse click I recently tried to use QGIS and I wondered if you can convert a draft ArcGIS map (*.mxd file) into a QGIS project (*.qgs file).   This would avoid thematize the entire project. I read that it makes a difference whether you calculate $\frac{dE(\lambda) }{d \lambda}=0$ or $\frac{dE(\omega)}{d \omega}=0$ in the sense that the maximum energy density with respect to the wavelength does not coincide with the frequency maximum that one would assume to be at $\omega_{max} = \frac{c}{\lambda_{max}}$. Actually, I do not understand why this is so ( Now, I am only interested in a pure physical explanation, mathematically this is clear and due to the chain rule). Does anybody know how to explain this odd thing?  Somehow I feel that the core of the question has not been completely answered. Although I can easily look up wikipedia, where the need for the chain rule is explained, I am rather interested in understanding where the following argument breaks down, which seems to be why this question has caused some confusion in the past(as you can see by googling this question):  So we have $E(\omega)$ the energy radiated at a given frequency. Now this function has a maximum somewhere, so there is a frequency where a maximal amount of energy is emitted. In other words: If you add the sum of the photon's energies at each frequency that are emitted, you will notice that the maximum is reached at this frquency. Now $E(\lambda)$ tells you basically the same for the wavelength, but again: We know where at which frequency the maximal amount of energy is radiated, so we know the corresponding wavelength.   I think there is a need to explain this.   If anything is unclear, please let me know. Proving that the Intersection of any Collection of Compact Sets is Compact I was trying to do this problem this way:  Let $\mathcal{B}=\{B_i\}$ be a collection of compact sets. By Heine-Borel, each of the $B_i$'s are closed and bounded. We already know that the intersection of a collection of closed sets is once again closed, so $\cap \mathcal{B}$ is closed.  If I can prove $\cap\mathcal{B}$ is bounded as well, I can use Heine-Borel to say it is compact. So I was not sure how to show it was bounded, but a friend showed me his way of doing it. He did it the following way:  Let $b,a\in\mathbb{R}$ be an upper and lower bound for $B_1$, respectively. Since $\cap\mathcal{B}\subset B_1, a$ is a lower bound for $\cap \mathcal{B}$ and $b$ is an upper bound for $\cap\mathcal{B}$. Therefore, $\cap\mathcal{B}$ is bounded and then by Heine-Borel, it is compact.  My question is on the paragraph right above. I don't understand why what he did means that $a$ and $b$ are lower and upper bounds for $\cap\mathcal{B}.$ Can anyone explain why this is? Thanks. UK Visitor Visa: Required Time or Interval Between Visits? I am a US citizen and have recently visted the UK  with simply a passport which allowed me to vist for 6months I have heard rumors that I am obligated to stay in the US for a Equal amount of time that I have visited the UK before I am able to return, but I am struggling tour no any proof of this obligation .. Am I missing somthing or is it simply not true I'm kind of curious what kinds of criteria other people go through when selecting the correct answer to their questions.  Here's what I consider when selecting the answer to my question:   Is the answer objective?  It's easy to pick out biased answers.  Usually they involve a statement along the lines of "x sucks, you should ALWAYS use y." Do other members seem to support the answer?  Has it gotten a significant number of +1 posts or has it been voted up a number of times? Is the answer the most thorough?  Does it have an example?   With that said, there are a couple of BAD reasons to choose an answer in my opinion:   The answer is what you want to hear.  My biggest pet peeve is when somebody asks what ostensibly appears to be a valid question, but is really just a thinly veiled attempt to get someone to agree with them.  Thus, the question usually ends up showing a certain bias.  And guess which answer gets selected?  The one that confirms that bias. Nobody posted a better answer.  If you don't see a good enough answer, don't select one.   I'm sure there are a few things I'm leaving out, plus some of what I've said may be arguable.  What is everyone else's take on this? Is there a particle called a "tachyon" that can travel faster than light?  If so, would Einstein's relativity be wrong?  According to Einstein no particle can travel faster than light. How to get exact camera view? List has No Rows for Assignment to SObject: Error How can I repair the Windows 8 EFI Bootloader? I installed Windows 7 and Windows 8 in EFI mode on a hard disk some days ago. Today, the bootloader got missing/corrupted.  I currently have the Windows 8 installer on a flash drive and tried using the Automatic Repair option to repair the bootloader but it didn't do anything. The Startup Repair option is also missing in the Windows 8 installer.  How I can repair/recreate the EFI bootloader from the Command Prompt?  BCDEDIT returns the following message:  The requested system device cannot be found. Find expected value of $\frac{1}{1+\xi}$ Find expected value of $\frac{1}{1+\xi}$ if $\xi$ has Poisson distribution.  My try:  $$E\left[ \frac{1}{1+\xi}\right]=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}{x}_{k}{p}_{k}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k+1}\frac{\lambda^ke^{-\lambda}}{k!}$$  Is it right? What is the benefit of Krivine's notation? I saw some people uses Krivine's notation for function application when presenting the syntax for the $\lambda$-calculus.  For example, the $\lambda$-term $\lambda f . \lambda x . \lambda y . f\ x\ y$ (with the normal convention that function application associates to the left, so it actually means $\lambda f . \lambda x . \lambda y . ((f\ x)\ y)$) is written $\lambda f . \lambda x . \lambda y . (f)\ x\ y$ (with a similar convention that it actually means $\lambda f . \lambda x . \lambda y . ((f)\ x)\ y$).  I do not see the point of having another pair of parentheses around the innermost $f$.  Why do people use Krivine's notation instead of the usual one? Can we divide two vector quantities? For eg., Pressure( a scalar) equals force (a vector) divided by area (a vector).