Biber gives "I found no \citation commands". Is there a solution ?
Biblatex/biber fails with a strange error about missing recode_data.xml file
How do I disable search-as-you-type text in Ubuntu 17.10 and later? I cannot find enable-interactive-search in    gsettings set org.gnome.nautilus.preferences enable-interactive-search true.     I searched using    gsettings list-recursively | grep search     and    gsettings list-recursively | grep interactive     but no such option.  Can you help me disable this in Ubuntu 17.10 and later? I've got a small piece of code that is parsing an index value to determine a cell input into Excel.  It's got me thinking...  What's the difference between   xlsSheet.Write("C" + rowIndex.ToString(), null, title);   and  xlsSheet.Write(string.Format("C{0}", rowIndex), null, title);   Is one "better" than the other? And why? in my earlier question you can find at:   i describe my error:     I'm using an Asus Zenbook UX562F with an integrated GTX 1050 Max-Q.   After the installation, I installed Nvidia-390 and updated the kernel   with ukuu to 4.20.17 to fix no sound issue.      After the reboot, everything went well and I did:      apt-get update apt-get upgrade + J      All was done well, so I restarted and on the next boot after selecting   Ubuntu in GRUB it gave me a long black screen (violet screen) where   nothing changes after so much time.      I tried to add nomodeset and noveau.modeset=0 single and together but   didn't help so I don't know what to do.   After investigating deeper by installing packages and try to boot i found out that the package which is causing the error is:  intel-microcode   when i purge and block this package with:  sudo apt-get purge intel-microcode sudo apt-mark hold intel-microcode   before upgrading wuth  sudo apt-get upgrade   my system is able to boot normal.  The problem i see is that as i understand it the package protects my intel cpu  Intel® Core™ i7 8565U 1.8 GHz   is vulnearable to meltdown attacks which get fixed by the package.  What can i do to fix the vulnearbility and also get my system to a bootable state?  Thanks for your help Vimu  Edit: I used the manual update technique mentioned at (in german):    and i used the files from the intel github repo:    with the following code mentioned in the tutorial to update the firmware microcode files  sudo cp intel-ucode/06-8e-09 /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/ echo 1 | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload   i overwrote the old microcode firmware with the newest available on the intel repo  it leada to a bootable system  will this be the best possible fix without upgrading the intel-microcode package provided by apt? loading a view in popup hi i'm trying to display a view in a popup but unable to get a solution. i tried   colorbox node module popup views integration module   Is there any better way to display a view as a popup ? What does Pokémon Appraisal actually tell you in Pokémon Go? Proof that $\frac {1} {2\pi i} \oint \frac {{\rm d}z} {P(z)} $ over a closed curve is zero. Prove that $$\frac {1} {2\pi i} \oint \frac {{\rm d}z} {P(z)} $$ over a closed  smooth simple curve that contains all of the roots of the polynomial $P(z)$ is either zero if $n \geq 2$ or equals $\frac{1} {a_0} $ if it's degree is $1$.   Proof: $n\geq 2$ $$\frac {1} {P(z)=(z-z_0)(z-z_1)\dots(z-z_n)}$$ So after partial decomposition of the fraction I'll have something like $$\frac {A} {z-z_0} +\frac{B} {z-z_1}+\cdots$$ where $A,B \in \mathbb{C}$ (Is this fact true that $A,B$ wont be polynomials and just coefficients I can see it why in an intuitive way but cannot write a full proof of it for the decomposition trying to get a linear system or something) then use Cauchy's theorem and integrate all of these on  different circles with their center at each root  and argue that  the integral is the same as the sum of those circle integrals. Now since $\frac {1}{z-z_n}$ will be analytic inside the circle when I'm integrating on circles that do not contain $z_n$  some  of those integrals  will be zero. and now since my curves are of the form $\gamma(t)=z_n+e^{it}$ , $t \in [0,2\pi]$ the rest of the integrals  will look like $$\int_0^{2\pi}  \frac{Aie^{ti}} {e^{it}}\,{\rm d}t $$  and all of them will be $A_i$.   Is my proof correct? Only part I cannot show is that I won't have any problem with decomposing the fraction. And I'm also using the assumption that after the decomposition I'll have as numerators simple complex numbers not not functions of any kind. Calling C/C++ from Python? What would be the quickest way to construct a Python binding to a C or C++ library?  (I am using Windows if this matters.) Alternatives to 'respectively' Aligning numbers by decimal points in table columns $\lfloor x\rfloor + \lfloor y\rfloor \leq \lfloor x+y\rfloor$ for every pair of numbers of $x$ and $y$ Give a convincing argument that $\lfloor x\rfloor + \lfloor y\rfloor \leq \lfloor x+y\rfloor$ for every pair of numbers $x$ and $y$. Could someone please explain how to prove this? I attempted to say that the largest values that could be added to $x$ and $y$ is $0.99$ and that doing so still made $\lfloor x\rfloor + \lfloor y\rfloor &lt; \lfloor x+y\rfloor$. However, my answer was not accepted. How to dismiss the Windows 8.1 Upgrade banner? Why should users never use normal sudo to start graphical applications? I have a client whose workforce is comprised entirely of remote employees using a mix of Apple and Windows 7 PCs/laptops.   The users don't authenticate against a domain at the moment, but the organization would like to move in that direction for several reasons. These are company-owned machines, and the firm seeks to have some control over account deactivation, group policy and some light data-loss prevention (disable remote media, USB, etc.) They are concerned that requiring VPN authentication in order to access AD would be cumbersome, especially at the intersection of a terminated employee and cached credentials on a remote machine.  Most services in the organization are Google-based (mail, file, chat, etc.) so the only domain services are DNS and the auth for their Cisco ASA VPN.  The customer would like to understand why it is not acceptable to expose their domain controllers to the public. In addition, what is a more acceptable domain structure for a distributed remote workforce?  Edit:   is in use for a handful of Mac clients. In my .bib file, I have two entries with exactly the same author names:  @article{Seshadrinathan2010A-Subjective-St,     Author = {K. Seshadrinathan and R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack}, ....  @article{Seshadrinathan2009Study-of-Subjec,     Author = {K. Seshadrinathan and R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik and L. K. Cormack}, ....   When cited after each other, and typeset with the IEEEtran bibliography style, the .bbl file reads:  \bibitem{Seshadrinathan2010A-Subjective-St} K.~Seshadrinathan, R.~Soundararajan, A.~C. Bovik, and L.~K. Cormack, ``A   subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms,''   \emph{SPIE Proceedings Human Vision and Electronic Imaging}, 2010.  \bibitem{Seshadrinathan2009Study-of-Subjec} ------, ``Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video,''   \emph{IEEE Transactions on Image Processing}, 2009.   As you can see, the author names have been replaced with ------. It looks like this in the final PDF:    Is this normal behavior? I don't want to use the Super for that, I want to use Alt+Space instead. My USB drive used to be originally 8GB when I bought it.  I'm trying to reformatted in Windows 7 by right clicking on the drive and selecting Format.... But the capacity only shows 250MB.  Is there something I can do to get the original size back? Maybe it got partitioned in a weird way?   The  flash drive is a SanDisk Cruzer Micro 8GB. I got it from Wal-Mart but this is the same drive. Compute $\frac{1}{e}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{n^{k}}{n!}$ for $k=0, 1, 2 ... $ Using some matlab (I know it's cheating) I found that: $$k=0 =&gt; Result=1$$ $$k=1 =&gt; Result=1$$ $$k=2 =&gt; Result=2$$ $$k=3 =&gt; Result=5$$ $$k=4 =&gt; Result=15$$ $$k=5 =&gt; Result=52$$ $$k=6 =&gt; Result=203$$  This sequence is puzzling... I have some edges that are not on the x, y or z axis. What is a simple way to straighten them? For example, I can scale and then use Shift+Z to straighten on the x and y axis.  Any shortcuts other than temporarily rotating the entire object to put the edges on an axis? How to undelete notes on iPhone "Notes" app? iPhone has a default "Notes" app which allows us to store notes. Stored notes can be deleted by hitting the "Delete Note" button:    How do we recover a note that is accidentally deleted?  Is there anyway to undo the delete? Java generics type erasure: when and what happens?