Why didn't the Dead Men of Dunharrow continue to attack the Eye of Sauron?
Why didn't Aragorn keep going with the army of the dead?
I am looking for instructions on how to install cedarview graphics drivers on Ubuntu 13.04 32bit.  My graphics hardware is a GMA3600 aka Power VR SGX545.  EDIT: It seems that they are not in Raring yet, but only Precise:   EDIT2: they seem to be closed source. Confirming that my own question is a duplicate by voting to close should have immediate effect Someone voted to close my question as a duplicate. I agreed, so I cast my close vote (I have enough reputation to vote to close).  . So I expected this to happen.  But it didn't. This confused me — is this not a question I asked after all? No, it is. Maybe I need to reload the page? Nope, the question still isn't closed. Is the asker confirmation feature broken? Well, there's the “This question may already have an answer here” banner at the top. What if I click “That solved my problem!”? Ah, that does close the question.  It turns out that only clicking “That solved my problem!” instantly closes the question. Casting a close vote has a different effect, it's just an ordinary close vote.  Please make casting a close vote equivalent to clicking “That solved my problem!”. JAVA Bad variable reference? Receiving strange output - possibly memory address? freezing header in a table in html Including a relative path to a class file Create JSON using apex I know someone or the other has asked about disabling ⌘Q, but I like the shortcut, and I use it often. However, I use an email client called Airmail that unfortunately does not keep a service (for notifications) running in the background when it is quitted. However, if I press the close button a service runs in the background, allowing me to receive notifications.  But since I have a habit of pressing ⌘Q all the time to close apps, I was looking into a way I could disable it for only Airmail.  Anyone know of a what to do this? It's become clear that last night's (Tues Jan 8th 2019) patches to Windows 7 broke SMB2 networking in Lanman Server.  One or both of KB 4480970 and KB 4480960 results in any OS that uses SMB2 (such as Windows XP, some Windows 7, and same generation server OS' and Mac OS X machines (certainly 10.10, 10.11 not sure about others yet)) being unable to connect to Windows 7 Pro shares.  Client machines repeatedly prompt for login despite credentials being correct. Which Mac is suitable for Blender 2.8? I am considering purchasing a Mac for my godson who will be using it to run Blender 2.8.  I know very little about this program.  All I can find are requirements for a Mac that will run earlier versions of Blender.  Would someone please recommend a list of requirements for a Mac (or a link to a list of requirements) that I could use to find a model that can run 2.8?  Thank you in advance for all your help! Sincerely, M. Lap What is the difference between a "proof by contradiction" and "proving the contrapositive"? Intuitive, it feels like doing the exact same thing. And when I compare an exercise, one person proves by contradiction, and the other proves the contrapositive, the proofs look almost exactly the same.  For example, say I want to prove: $P \implies Q$ When I want to prove by contradiction, I would say assume this is not true. Assume $Q$ is not true, and $P$ is true. Blabla, but this implies $P$ is not true, which is a contradiction.  When I want to prove the contrapositive, I say. Assume $Q$ is not true. Blabla, this implies $P$ is not true.  The only difference in the proof is that I assume $P$ is true in the beginning, when I want to prove by contradiction. But this feels almost redundant, as in the end I always get that this is not true. The only other way that I could get a contradiction is by proving that $Q$ is true. But this would be the exact same things as a direct proof.   Can somebody enlighten me a little bit here ? For example: Are there proofs that can be proven by contradiction but not proven by proving the contrapositve? This appears to be related to the behavior originally suggested in .  It appears to be the same issue raised in , but this post has specific steps to reproduce the issue.  Here's what happened on one site in the network earlier today:   A question was posted much earlier Someone came along, and as an unregistered, new user with no other activity, posted a spam answer to that question at 04:36:54 UTC That same user posted a comment on their own answer with the same spam link at 04:37:31 UTC The answer was deleted as spam via community votes at 07:32:07 UTC A high-rep user saw the comment and raised a custom flag on it as being spammy at 07:32:54 UTC The unregistered user account was destroyed by a moderator at 08:13:10 UTC The comment now shows as "deleted by Anonymous" with a deletion time of 08:13:10 UTC The flag on the comment remains, but the only options are "Edit" and "Decline"; there is no "Delete" action   That there is no "Delete" action possible on the flag is reasonable, since the comment is now deleted. However, the flag is/was legitimate, so to decline the flag would be wrong. There's also nothing to leave while editing out the spammy part of the comment, as the comment consists solely of the same spam URL.  There is also no undelete option on the comment, so it's not possible to undelete the comment and then mark the flag as helpful by re-deleting the comment.  Effectively, this means that while the comment itself is effectively gone, the flag on it is in limbo and there is no good choice for what to do with the flag.  When deleting comments normally, my understanding is that any flags associated with those comments are automatically marked as helpful. However, it appears that the deletion of comments when destroying the user who posted them does not do that.  Therefore, I suggest that whenever comments are deleted as part of the owning user being destroyed, any pending flags against those comments should be marked as helpful at the same time.  It would also be a nice touch if those comments showed as deleted by Community♦, instead of Anonymous, but that's less of a concern in my case. What is the difference between the Bash operators [[ vs [ vs ( vs ((? I am a little bit confused on what do these operators do differently when used in bash (brackets, double brackets, parenthesis and double parenthesis).  [[ , [ , ( , ((   I have seen people use them on if statements like this :  if [[condition]]  if [condition]  if ((condition))  if (condition) Show discontinuity of $\frac{xy}{x^2+y^2}$ Is the EmDrive, or "Relativity Drive" possible? In 2006, New Scientist magazine published an article titled 1 [] about the  [] which stirred up a fair degree of controversy and  that New Scientist was engaging in pseudo-science.   Since the original article the inventor claims that a "Technology Transfer contract with a major US aerospace company was successfully completed", and that papers have been published by Professor Yang Juan of The North Western Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China. 2   Furthermore, it was  that the Chinese were going to attempt to build the device.  Assuming that the inventor is operating in good faith and that the device actually works, is there another explanation of the claimed resulting propulsion?  Notes:  1. Direct links to the article may not work as it seems to have been archived. 2. The abstracts provided on the  website claim that they are Chinese language journals which makes them very difficult to chase down and verify. I seem to have screwed up something that allows you to inset evenly, I think I have tried every combination of settings in inset and pivot center and even is far from even.  I tried uninstalling and re installing blender 2.71 and get the same result.  The image attached is a simple default cube that I tried to inset evenly.  I have also attached the blend file link  help?? GParted can't resize partition, but unallocated partition is available If $$\tan(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{\theta}{2})=\tan^3(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{\alpha}{2})$$, then prove that $$\sin \theta=\frac{3 \sin \alpha+\sin^3 \alpha}{1+3\sin^2 \alpha}$$  I tried using the fact that  $\frac{\cos A}{1-\sin A}=\tan(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{A}{2})$ but now not able to eliminate $\cos \alpha$ and $\cos \theta$. How should I proceed? I have a 8 GB pendrive. I used to write raw data into the pendrive (without creating filesystem) using the dd command.    Today, when I inserted the pen drive, the I am unable to write anything on to it.  When I open gparted it is showing the total space on the pen drive as 500 MB. I am unable to create a new partition table or a partition on the pen drive now.   Here is the fdisk -l output.   Disk /dev/sdb: 0 MB, 512000 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 0 cylinders, total 1000 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00095df6   What's wrong with the pen drive? How can I recover the lost space?   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System   When I open gnome-disks, it shows the total space as 8 GB but when I try to create a new partition using it, it shows the following error:  Error creating partition on /dev/sdb: Command-line parted --align optimal --script "/dev/sdb" "mkpart primary ext2 1MiB 7969177599b"' exited with non-zero exit status 1: Error: The location 7969177599b is outside of the device /dev/sdb.  (udisks-error-quark, 0) Show the number of up-votes and down-votes on the mobile site theme Autosegmental Representation in tikz-qtree This is what I want to achieve    and this:    But all I've been able to make with tikz-qtree is the following:  \documentclass[12pt,a4]{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{tipa,tikz,tikz-qtree} \begin{document}  \begin{tikzpicture} [baseline] \tikzset{frontier/.style={distance from root=90pt}} \Tree [.$\sigma$ [.O [ p ] ] [.R [.$\mu$ a ] [.$\mu$ : ] ] ] \end{tikzpicture} \begin{tikzpicture} [baseline] \tikzset{frontier/.style={distance from root=90pt}} \Tree [.$\sigma$ [.O [ p ] ] [.R [.$\mu$ a ]  ] ] \end{tikzpicture}   And this:  \begin{tikzpicture}[baseline] \tikzset{frontier/.style={distance from root=90pt}} \Tree [.$\sigma$ [.O [ l ] ] [.R [.$\mu$ a ] [.$\mu$ l ] ] ] \end{tikzpicture} \begin{tikzpicture} [baseline] \tikzset{frontier/.style={distance from root=90pt}} \Tree [.$\sigma$ [.O [ : ] ] [.R [.$\mu$ a ] [ l ] ] ] \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   Which renders:    and    The important part here is the linking from the leaves to more than one parent (it would be nice if I had the option of making the line dashed too). Now, pst-asr doesn't quite achieve what I want it to. It's important that I have the moras ('mu's). (Also it's a pstricks package, which means I must typeset it in DVIPSPDF.) I have tried a bit of the forest-package (especially forest-GP1), but I can't make that work as I want either. Lastly, some have recommended xyling, but I find that package very difficult to use.  Any recommendations?  Thanks.