is there a library to print blank calendars?
LaTeX Classes or Styles for Schedules and/or Calendars?
Can I install Android on my non-Android device? Inverse Laplace transform of $\frac{1}{s\sinh{c\sqrt{s}}}$ I have some questions.  I have to take the inverse Laplace transform of the given function below by residue theorem:   $\frac{1}{s\sinh{c\sqrt{s}}}$   where s is Laplacian variable and c is a real constant. Actually it has a very crowded numerator which I do not need to define. So far I know that it has a simple pole at s = zero and infinitely many poles at c√s = nπi  Questions:  1- What is the order of the poles at nπi? Is it 1/2?  2- At zero, what is the order? (Because to residue at zero, s also contributes)  3- What is the way of solving this question at nπi by residue theorem (without defining sinh function as exponential function)?  Thanks for any help. Is it possible to install an earlier version of Skype on Windows 8? BBWC: in theory a good idea but has one ever saved your data? I'm familiar with what a BBWC (Battery-backed write cache) is intended to do - and previously used them in my servers even with good UPS. There are obvously failures it does not provide protection for. I'm curious to understand whether it actually offers any real benefit in practice.  (NB I'm specifically looking for responses from people who have BBWC and had crashes/failures and whether the BBWC helped recovery or not)  Update  After the feedback here, I'm increasingly skeptical as whether a BBWC adds any value.  To have any confidence about data integrity, the filesystem MUST know when data has been committed to non-volatile storage (not necessarily the disk - a point I'll come back to). It's worth noting that a lot of disks lie about when data has been committed to the disk (). While it seems reasonable to assume that disabling the on-disk cache might make the disks more honest, there's still no guarantee that this is the case either.  Due to the typcally large buffers in a BBWC, a barrier can require significantly more data to be commited to disk therefore causing delays on writes: the general advice is to disable barriers when using a non-volatile write back cache (and to disable on-disk caching). However this would appear to undermine the integrity of the write operation - just because more data is maintained in non-volatile storage does not mean that it will be more consistent. Indeed, arguably without demarcation between logical transactions there seems to be less opportunity to ensure consistency than otherwise.   If the BBWC were to acknowledge barriers at the point the data enters it's non-volatile storage (rather than being committed to disk) then it would appear to satisfy the data integrity requirement without a performance penalty - implying that barriers should still be enabled. However since these devices generally exhibit behaviour consistent with flushing the data to the physical device (significantly slower with barriers) and the widespread advice to disable barriers, they cannot therefore be behaving in this way. WHY NOT?  If the I/O in the OS is modelled as a series of streams then there is some scope to minimise the blocking effect of a write barrier when write caching is managed by the OS - since at this level only the logical transaction (a single stream) needs to be committed. On the other hand, a BBWC with no knowledge of which bits of data make up the transaction would have to commit its entire cache to disk. Whether the kernel/filesystems actually implement this in practice would require a lot more effort than I'm wiling to invest at the moment.  A combination of disks telling fibs about what has been committed and sudden loss of power undoubtedly leads to corruption - and with a Journalling or log structured filesystem which don't do a full fsck after an outage its unlikely that the corruption will be detected let alone an attempt made to repair it.   In terms of the modes of failure, in my experience most sudden power outages occur because of loss of mains power (easily mitigated with a UPS and managed shutdown). People pulling the wrong cable out of rack implies poor datacentre hygene (labelling and cable management). There are some types of sudden power loss event which are not prevented by a UPS - failure in the PSU or VRM a BBWC with barriers would provide data integrity in the event of a failure here, however how common are such events? Very rare judging by the lack of responses here.   Certainly moving the fault tolerance higher in the stack is significantly more expensive the a BBWC - however implementing a server as a cluster has lots of other benefits for performance and availability.  An alternative way to mitigate the impact of sudden power loss would be to implement a SAN - AoE makes this a practical proposition (I don't really see the point in iSCSI) but again there's a higher cost. I had this "almost bonus" question on the final in Group Theory recently: prove that there is no such group $G$ which would satisfy Aut$(G)\cong \mathbb{Z}_n$, where $n$ is an odd integer. I don't have much certainty if this proof is OK, and one's opinion would be appreciated.  Here's my attempt:     Suppose that there exists such a group $G$ that satisfies the above condition. Since $\mathbb{Z}_n$ is cyclic, Aut$(G)$ is also cyclic and $G$ is abelian, which implies that Inn$(G)\cong \{e\}$. Thus Aut$(G)=$Out$(G)$. (I don't think this fact is important here though). Now, since an automorphism sends a generator to a generator, and since each automorphism is completely determined by such mapping, |Aut($G$)| must be of factorial order. But an integer factorial is always even. However, $|\mathbb{Z}_n|$ is odd, which is a contradiction. Therefore, no such $G$ exists.   I'm afraid that my proof is not very nice, but at least a genuine attempt was made. Let $U,W$ be subspaces of a vector space $V$. Show that   $$\dim(U)+\dim(W)=\dim(U+W)+\dim(U\cap W)$$   Hint: Show that the map given by $L:U×W\to V$ given by $L(u,w)=u-w$ is linear.   I can show that $L:U×W\to V$ given by $L(u,w)=u-w$ is a linear map. I also know that the dimension of $U×W$ is $\dim(U)+\dim(W)$. What do I do next? Any hints? Git ignore file for Xcode projects Which files should I include in .gitignore when using Git in conjunction with Xcode? Is there any canon information in Harry Potter that proves one way or another whether a wizard always owns only one wand as a matter of routine?  What I am talking about is a wizard buying and owning one wand and also a second wand (for backup, or simultaneous use, or separate purpose, or ceremonial+work wand), akin to people buying more than one pair of boots, guns or hammers.  A proof would be either canon info showing someone owning 2 wands simultaneously; or a statement showing why that does not happen except in rare exceptions (see below).    NOTE: I am discounting special situations such as winning an extra wand in a duel ala Harry (e.g. the second wand's obtainment wasn't intended/planned), or someone winning a Death Stick from prior owner (in which case it was intended as a replacement wand and not an extra one); or taking another's wand for a time being, ala Voldemort and Lucius Malfoy (since it was more of a "temporary replacement because main wand was useless for the purpose due to paired cores" - far from a normal situation).  Also, I meant wands intended for use - e.g. if Malfoy would have a (imagined by me) collection of rare antique wands, that's as irrelevant as someone having flintlocks in a display case. In $ \triangle ABC$ show that $ 1 \lt \cos A + \cos B + \cos C \le \frac 32$ Finding $\frac {d(\tan \theta)}{d\theta}$ How can I prevent data theft from a company?  Are there any solutions to this problem?  Is there any software that encrypts important data (.doc, .xls, etc.) and prevents it from copying?  I need a solution where employees can read/write documents but can not copy then to a USB drive or e-mail them. It was suggested to me recently that Annihilator sacrifices (such as 's) are only chosen during resolution, rather than while they're going on the stack.  Do I choose those sacrifices during resolution? What part of the comprehensive rules backs that up?  I can't find any clarity on the internet, in the rules, on the MTG Salvation wiki for Annihilator, or in the ability's rulings. It seems reasonable, but I'd like to know what's behind it. Plus, if I can choose and then later  some stuff, all the better. How do I remove any Ubuntu brand and trademark from my Ubuntu install? If two vectors $a$ and $b$ make angle $\alpha$ and $\beta$ with the $x$-axis, prove, using vectors, that:   $$\cos(\beta - \alpha) = \cos \alpha \cos\beta + \sin\alpha \sin\beta$$   I tried taking components of each vector along the plane, but that didn't get me anywhere. I tried taking component of vector $b$ along vector $a$, but I also got stuck there. Can anyone point me in the right direction? How can I export object's field schema information to excel? How can I export the fields of an object from Salesforce into an Excel sheet? I'm only looking for the field schema information, not the objects records. Onomatopoeia for disgust I have a chain object. And i have a curve it follows. I got it to work for following curve, but chain object is not circles but both parts are more like stretched circles (ovals). Object i made with 2 toruses one rotated 90 degrees and then joined them together. I tried single torus too. But same issue. on a curve it just looks stretched oval. What can be the issue?   Thanks Migrate site from dev environment to production server - 404 errors We completed development on our dev environment and I copied the files over from the dev server to the production server through FTP.   Then through back up and migrade module, I made a back up of the SQL database. I created a new database through Plesk with the same name, username and password. I then imported the SQL database into the new server through phpmyadmin. I go to the URL and get the Site Maintenance message (which is correct, I placed the site in maintenance mode before copying the files over) but cannot navigate to any sub pages. Generally I can add /user or /admin to the end of the url and get the login screen. However all I get are 404 errors. Is there a way to Inset in the opposite direction (not Outset)? Is there an operation similar to inset that creates faces in the opposite direction? That is, instead of creating faces inwards, they create faces outwards? A normal inset operation:  What I would like: Should a student be penalized for using a theorem outside of the curriculum?