Two instances of Haste with one ending?
What happens with lethargy when Haste is cast again on a creature before first cast runs out?
How can I listen to communication between a process and a serial port? On a Gentoo Linux machine, a process is communicating with another computer via serial port (/dev/ttyS1). I want to listen to this communication (i.e. what is being sent/received by the process) without further interfering.   How can I achieve this with just basic Linux tools? I even can change the serial port the process is communicating with, so maybe I can 'shortcut' two devices (/dev/ttyS1 and /dev/xxx) listen to all communication, when all output to /dev/ttyS1 is forwarded to /dev/xxx and vice versa. But how do I do it? Something with socat? How do I enable or disable Apport? I'm using the caption package.  In the List-Of-Figures I get only the numbers, but I also want to have the prefix. It currently looks like that:     List of Figures   1 Caption of Figure 1........1   2 Caption of Figure 2........9     And I want it to look like:     List of Figures   Figure 1: Caption of Figure 1...1   Figure 2: Caption of Figure 2...9     The same format is already used for the captions themselves. It is easy to find the minimum of $\|Ax-b\|_2$, when $A$ has full column rank. But how is the case when we add the constraint $\|x\|_2=1$? Or, to be explicit,  $$\min_{\|x\|_2=1}\|Ax-b\|_2=?$$  My idea is to construct the corresponding Lagrange function  $$L(x,\lambda) = (Ax-b)^T(Ax-b) + \lambda(x^T x - 1)$$  Differentiate the function with respect to $x,\lambda$, we have  $$A^T A x - A^T b + \lambda x = 0$$  $$x^T x=1$$  However, I find it hard to move forward to get the answer. Could anyone help me? Thanks a lot! I know people prefer using CorelDraw or Adobe Illustrator, but I want to know if there is a technique I can follow to use Adobe Photoshop to make vector Images. Let $V,W$ be two vector spaces over a field $F$ and let $f:V \to W$ be a linear mapping. I have going over some facts about vector spaces (not necessarily finite dimensional) and I have been trying to apply the rank nullity theorem to derive a simple lemma.  I have not been able to complete the proof and was wondering if I need to use something other then $\ker f + \mathrm{Im}\; f = \dim V$.  How do we show that for ever vector subspace $K \subset W$, $ \dim(f^{-1}(K)) = \dim(K \cap \mathrm{Im}\; f) + \dim( \mathrm{Ker}\; f)$? Find all entire functions $f(z)$ such that $|f(z)|=1$ for $|z|=1$ I'm building a Core  system which supports dual-channel memory (up to 16&nbsp;GB in four DIMMs), my target is 8&nbsp;GB. From the performance perspective, is it better to have two times 4&nbsp;GB or four times 2&nbsp;GB? Did svchost.exe behaviour change in Windows 10 Creators Update (Build 1703)? Intuitive/direct proof that a rectangle partitioned into rectangles each with at least one integer side must itself have an integer side A challenge problem asked to show that if rectangle $R$ with axis-parallel sides is partitioned into finitely many subrectangles $R_1,R_2,\ldots,R_n$ (also with axis-parallel sides), such that each $R_i$ has at least one integer side length, then $R$ must also have at least one integer side length. The only proof I've seen, although simple, is quite unintuitive. Namely you look at the integral  $$ \int_R e^{2 \pi i (x+y)} dx dy $$ and note that the integral is $0$ if and only if $R$ has an integer side length, and then note that by assumption the integral is $0$ over all the $R_i$, hence summing the integral over all $R_i$ gives that the integral is also $0$ over $R$. Can someone give a more direct/intuitive argument that doesn't use voodoo like a complex-valued integral? You have two identical eggs. Standing in front of a 100 floor building, you wonder what is the maximum number of floors from which the egg can be dropped without breaking it. What is the minimum number of tries needed to find out the solution? How to programmatically remove a field from a node? text-overflow: ellipsis in table-cell without width Where can I download Ubuntu 16.04? I am unable to find the link for downloading Ubuntu 16.04 onto my   desktop/laptop. I am able to see the link only for 18.04, but I need 16.04. Given (p ∧ q), use the Fitch system to prove (q ∨ r) I'm having trouble solving a Fitch Style Proof and I was hoping someone would be able to help me.  Premises: p ∧ q  Goal: q ∨ r  Would be an assumption (p ∧ q => q ∨ r) in first step a correct one?   Then, q ∨ r Implication Elimination: 2, 1  Why is it not correct?  Thank you very much for any help! How did Bill and Percy get 12 OWLs? In Prisoner of Azkaban, Hermione took 12 subjects, and needed a Time-Turner to do so. However, it is mentioned in the series that both Bill and Percy Weasley got 12 OWLs, so would have taken 12 subjects as well, so both would have needed Time-Turners for three years to do this. Doesn't this seem a little unusual, given how strict the Ministry is over the use of Time-Turners,  that they would give them to several Hogwarts students? I want to repeatedly execute a function in Python every 60 seconds forever (just like an  in Objective C). This code will run as a daemon and is effectively like calling the python script every minute using a cron, but without requiring that to be set up by the user.  In , the solution appears to effectively just  for x seconds. I don't need such advanced functionality so perhaps something like this would work  while True:     # Code executed here     time.sleep(60)   Are there any foreseeable problems with this code? Should “two weeks vacation” be written “two weeks’ vacation” with a possessive apostrophe? I’ve always understood that the phrase two weeks usually turns into two weeks’ when used as a modifier as in   I’m giving my two weeks’ notice.  I get two weeks’ vacation. (“two weeks’ holiday” for Brits)   with an apostrophe on the word weeks’, indicating that the vacation “belongs” to the weeks.   One way to explain this is the phrase “two weeks of vacation” being contracted to “two weeks’ vacation” – the vacation is “of” the weeks; that is, it is possessed by them.  But I’ve seen a lot of people omit the apostrophe in casual writing, and thinking about it, it seems plausible that the noun vacation would be plainly modified by the adjectival phrase two weeks.  But on the other hand, shouldn’t adjectival phrases be hypenated, namely two-weeks vacation?  Yet that seems wrong, too: the hyphenate should be singular, two-week vacation (like two-tone shoes) because .   touches on this (and references a good ) but doesn’t explain why the plural must be possessive in this case.   suggests that two weeks might be adverbial rather than adjectival, and thus resists being used attributively. But that still doesn’t quite explain this particular muddle of pluralization, possession, and attribution.  Given all this, why should “two weeks vacation” be written “two weeks’ vacation” with a possessive apostrophe? Prove that there exists irrational numbers $x$ and $y$ such that $x + y$ is rational, without using subtraction My homework has this problem:     Prove that there exist irrational numbers $x$ and $y$ such that $x +  y$ is rational.   There is an easy solution that I found on mathbitsnotebook.com:     \begin{align} \left(2+6\sqrt{7}\right) + \left(-6\sqrt{7}\right) = 2.\end{align}   Can we prove the same without using subtraction? After learning about the  datasets I've working with the following layers, from the USA data   Country boundaries State boundaries County boundaries City boundaries ZipCode/Postcode boundaries   What I am trying to find is the equivalent (where appropriate) of the same data for various countries.  Is there any free administrative boundaries available as shapefiles for other countries?