How to open huge PNG image
What software works well for viewing massive TIFF images on Windows 7?
How quickly does the Ultimate Meter fill up? Classify orbits of conjugating action on $GL_2(\mathbb{C})$ I've got a domain that I apparently forgot to set a preferred domain for, so I just tried to do it. Webmaster Tools instead popped up a little box:     Part of the process of setting a preferred domain is to verify that you own http://www.example.com/. Please verify http://www.example.com/.   I'm running into some problems following these instructions:   As far as I can tell I already did verify sometime in the past. There's a TXT DNS record with the gibberish Google tells you to set for it that I couldn't have come up with myself. …and nothing is telling me this information is bad. So let's assume the site is somehow not actually verified. All  instructions start with "click the Manage Site button next to the site you want, and then click Verify this site." That button doesn't even exist on my screens. (It presumably goes away when you successfully verify?) Those instructions were all updated pretty recently, and the DNS one in particular just a couple weeks ago so it seems a bit unlikely they're inaccurate.   I am not using Apps, and won't be, so can't try out the verification .   Note that I also have another domain that I have not done any verification for which is showing the same behavior(no such button, being told to verify when it seems impossible etc.) so something appears to just be broken.  I already have a no-www process in place server-side, so we can skip that. I'm just trying to get the box checked off in GWT.  If I don't get any resolution, I'll eventually scrap the TXT record and see if the site gets un-verified(or whatever since it thinks it isn't), and see if I can just restart the process.  It's not urgent so I'm just trying to figure out if I've gone blind to something or what. Did the button move? How to get/suppress french spacing before punctuation in `\href` Attention I have already a possible answer and will add it soon. I thought it would be useful to have a solution about it on the site. (Other answers are naturally welcome too).  Question How to activate or suppress the french spacing before some punctuations like a colon in the text argument of \href locally (for one specific \href) and globally? Switching the language is not an answer!  Minimal examples for tests (the argument of \href should normally be a valid url, so it is a bit unfair to add an example without a colon in the link):  pdflatex  With pdflatex it depends on the link how the argument of \href is printed:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[french]{babel}  \usepackage{hyperref}  \begin{document} With pdflatex no french spacing in links with colons:   \href{link}{a:b}  \href{link:colon}{a:b}  \end{document}     lualatex  With lualatex the spaces are always there:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[french]{babel}  \usepackage{hyperref}  \begin{document} With lualatex always spaces:  \href{link}{a:b}  \href{link:colon}{a:b}  \end{document} Why can't I seem to grasp interfaces? Could someone please demystify interfaces for me or point me to some good examples? I keep seeing interfaces popup here and there, but I haven't ever really been exposed to good explanations of interfaces or when to use them.  I am talking about interfaces in a context of interfaces vs. abstract classes. Unexpected results when mounting two drives on a single mount point I was running out of /tmp space on one of my servers today so I attached a new 100GB disk to the system and did the following without unmounting /usr/tmpDSK from /tmp:  mkfs.ext4 /dev/xvde mount /dev/xvde /tmp   and now df -h outputs as:  Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /usr/tmpDSK      98G  4.5G   89G   5% /tmp /dev/xvde        98G  4.5G   89G   5% /tmp    The size of /usr/tmpDSK shows :  [root@server2 usr]# ll -h /usr/tmpDSK -rw------- 1 root root 2.3G Jan 27 17:32 /usr/tmpDSK    Different forums suggested using mhddfs to mount multiple drives on a single mount point, but I just did it directly and it seems to have worked -- or am I missing something?  I am hoping to better understand what actually happened. What can I do if a repository/PPA does not have a Release file? Taken from :  Show that it cannot be the case that $U=X+Y$ where $U$ is uniformly distributed on [0,1] and $X$ and $Y$ are independent and identically distributed. You should not assume that X and Y are continuous variables.  A simple proof by contradiction suffices for the case where $X$, $Y$ are assumed discrete by arguing that it always possible to find a $u$ and $u'$ such that $P(U\leq u+u') \geq P(U\leq u)$ while $P(X+Y \leq u) = P(X+Y \leq u+u')$.  However this proof does not extend to $X,Y$ being absolutely continuous or singular continuous. Hints/Comments/Critique? How do you properly use namespaces in C++? Changing parameter values according to other parameter choice in Processing script using QGIS 3? How to simplify the summation kk! without using induction? $$\sum_{k=1}^nk(k!)$$  I know the answer is (n+1)!-1..I can solve this question using principle of mathematical induction...but I would like to know if there is any other alternative approach What are all the member-functions created by compiler for a class? Does that happen all the time? Let $m$ and $n$ be two integers. Prove that if $m^2 + n^2$ is divisible by $4$, then both $m$ and $n$ are even numbers.   I think I have to use the contrapositive to solve this. So I assume $\neg P\implies Q$ and I have to derive $\neg Q$? I know its easier to show odd numbers rather than even... but im still unsure how to do this practice problem. How do you write (and run) a correct micro-benchmark in Java?  I'm looking for some code samples and comments illustrating various things to think about.  Example: Should the benchmark measure time/iteration or iterations/time, and why?  Related: Examples of bijective map from $\mathbb{R}^3\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ Clip for each feature I want to clip a polyline feature class by a polygon feature class (buffers created from points). Several polygons overlap, so I want to get each polygon feature clipped with each polyline feature.  Using the Clip_analysis tool, I get the orange lines:   whereas I want the following red lines:    In a python script, I tried the following code to clip every polyline with each polygon:          temp = arcpy.ValidateTableName("clip_temp")     bufferCursor = arcpy.SearchCursor(buffer)     n = 0     for pRow in bufferCursor:         arcpy.AddMessage(n)         feat = pRow.Shape         arcpy.Clip_analysis(inputPolylineLayer, feat, temp, "#")         if n == 0:             arcpy.Copy_management(temp, clip)         else:             arcpy.Append_management(temp, clip)         n=n+1   But the execution is very very slow and it crashes before finishing.  I also tried the Intersect_analysis tool but I didn't get the right geometries:   Do you have any idea of a better methods to do it? $\Bbb RP^2$ as the union of a Möbius band and a disc I spent some time trying to understand that the projective plane, $\Bbb RP^2$, can be viewed as the union of a Möbius band and a disc. I consider this using Homogeneous coordinates. But I still hope to really 'see' this fact in some way. Is it possible to run my scripts located in ~/scripts from anywhere?  Say i want to run ./scriptname regardless of my current working directory. Prove that the following inequality holds   $$a^a b^b c^c\ge (abc)^{\frac{a+b+c}{3}}$$   if $a,b,c$ are positive.   I'm not sure how to handle these kinds of powers. Are there any "famous" but not so advanced inequalities that involve this kinds of expressions?  I was trying to do something like ordering them without lost of generality because it's symmetric, but I get nowhere and I just make the thing even more complicated.  I'm asking for solution rather than hints since this is my first time encountering these kinds of problems. Minor "you have already raised this type of flag" bug? I flagged something as spam, then was only 90% sure I'd done so, so I clicked the flag link again to check. It showed me this:    I had, of course, only raised the spam flag, not the offensive/abusive/hate flag, so the latter probably shouldn't be saying I did.    Ah, this may be a duplicate, I didn't search enough:        And if so, it's been around a while.