Test class coverage for QuoteLineModel and QuoteLineGroupModel apex class
Code coverage for wrapper class is 0%
Probability distribution in the coupon collector's problem Why don't the Google Docs CTRL + ALT shortcuts work? I'm currently using Google Docs, but when I try to use the keyboard shortcuts like Ctrl+Alt+M it gives µ instead.    Is Chrome (9) overruling Google Docs in some way?  How can I get these shortcuts working?  I'm using Chrome dev 9 on a Dutch Windows 7 with a US-layout keyboard I read this quite a while back, part of my parents library (they're in their 50s now) I think the book was probably published in the 70s or 80s, my copy was paperback. I don't recall the cover art, but I have vague recollections of a satellite on the cover and maybe blue with grid-lines below it?  I've made concerted efforts to find it again but to no avail. My parents don't remember it either, but mum's an avowed book-aholic and buys a lot of books, reads them once and forgets about them, so that's not so surprising.  The key parts I remember:   Both the Soviets and Americans were working on psychic techniques and technologies, with real and tangible results including Remote Viewing. MK-ULTRA was explicitly namedropped in relation to the American psychic program. The Soviets and Americans both had orbiting superweapons, One was a microwave laser (or something very similar) and the other used slivers of the brains of psychics to blow people's brains up in a wide area. A super-psychic (male) took offence to the state of the cold-war and took control over the orbital weapons by manipulating the onboard computers psychically. There's a gruesome description of a psychic weapon being tested on monkeys in a lab, the POV character throws up afterwards in horror. I think there might have been more than one POV character. There's an extended description of the psychic orbital weapon as experienced by people in its area of effect. Similar to the monkeys, it builds up, starting with alzheimer-esque hand-shaking and building up to seizures and screaming before their brain liquifies fully and either comes out the nose and ears or outright blows the skull open. (this is one of the more vivid recollections I have of the book) I remember that the super-psychic was working wholly alone and did most of his psychic stuff from motels halfway around the world from events. I believe the super-psychic also killed other psychics explicitly. The weapon satellites had code-names Both weapons were used on cities in the course of the story I vaguely recall an office building getting targeted specifically at one point. I haven't seen this behavior out in the wild much, but it happened again recently and I was wondering if a flag could be automatically raised when this happens:   User posts answer Answer is down voted User deletes answer User posts exact same text as a new answer User effectively ditched down votes   Got down voted again? Wash, rinse and repeat. Profit (perhaps after modifying the post, which is what you should have done to begin with)    I feel that this should raise a duplicate content flag, with slightly stronger wording. Would this be possible to implement? Or, perhaps, don't let users post new answers if they have a deleted answer to a question. Rather, force them to edit and restore the deleted answer instead, unless locked by a moderator.  I do have a link, but I don't want a lot of people to descend on it and create an even bigger disruption. It happened exactly as I described. Where does TREE(n) sit on the Fast Growing Hierarchy? Generalizing the case $p=2$ we would like to know if the statement below is true.  Let $p$ the smallest prime dividing the order of $G$. If $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ with index $p$ then $H$ is normal. Why is $\frac{1}{\frac{1}{0}}$ undefined? During the latest gaming session our level 3 Rogue was Two-Weapon fighting with a Rapier in the main-hand and a scimitar in the off-hand.  At the completion of our gaming session I contested the application of the Two-Weapon fighting rules as it seemed unbalanced.  Once I got home I reviewed the PHB and various RPGStack and Reddit but couldn't find a concrete answer.  My interpretation of the PHB Reference rules below is that although any class/character can technically wield a weapon in their off-hand, only those who have been granted a Bonus Action for which no explicit bonus action have been defined would be allowed to actually attack.  So in the case of a Rogue the Bonus Actions granted under Cunning Action allow for specific actions (none of which are attack).  The alternate interpretation would be the rules under Two-Weapon Fighting, perhaps it should be written      you receive a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you’re holding in the other hand.   This would, in my opinion, explicitly grant the Bonus Action to any character/class who is Two-Weapon Fighting.  After thorough review does it boil down to application of the rules-as-written and determining a house-rule to apply in our campaign?    References  Page 189 of PHB : Bonus Actions  Various class features, spells, and other abilities let you take an additional action on your turn called a bonus action. The Cunning Action feature, for example, allows a rogue to take a bonus action.      You can take a bonus action only when a special ability, spell, or other feature of the game states that you can do something as a bonus   action. You otherwise don’t have a bonus action to take.   You can take only one bonus action on your turn, so you must choose which bonus action to use when you have more than one available. You choose when to take a bonus action during your turn, unless the bonus action’s timing is specified, and anything that deprives you of your ability to take actions also prevents you from taking a bonus action.  Page 96 of PHB  A Rogue receives cunning action at level 2, You can take a bonus action on each of your turns in combat.      This action can be used only to take the Dash, Disengage, or Hide action.   Page 195 of PHB  Two-Weapon Fighting (Combat Rules)  When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you’re holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you’re holding in the other hand. You don’t add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative. If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon, instead of making a melee attack with it.  Page 165 of PHB  Dual Wielder  (Feat)  You master fighting with two weapons, gaining the following benefits:   You gain a +1 bonus to AC while you are wielding a separate melee weapon in each hand. You can use two-weapon fighting even when the one-handed melee weapons you are wielding aren't light. You can draw or stow two one-handed weapons when you would normally be able to draw or stow only one. "PuTTY key format too new" when using ppk file for PuTTY SSH key authentication I wanted to connect to my Unix server using SSH keys. For that I had converted my id_rsa file from ./ssh directory to a ppk file using PuTTYgen, but after loading my .ppk key I get this warning:  PuTTY key format too new   If I use my default id_rsa file, then I get error:  OpenSSH SSH-2 private key (old PEM format)  Either way I am getting stuck. Can anyone please help me? as of 4/2015 OS X Kindle App: Where are the books located? After I updated my Kindle for Mac app 2 mos. ago I can no longer find the azw book files on my Mac to convert them so I can read them on my KOBO ereader. I use to find them in a My Kindle Content file but that has disappeared. I have Ult. DRM &amp; Calibre but they won't work without the azw files, and I can't find them on my mac anymore. Can anyone help me? The answers on this site about this are years old &amp; do not apply to my problem. Setting knots in natural cubic splines in R I have data with many correlated features, and I want to start by reducing the features with a smooth basis function, before running an LDA. I'm trying to use natural cubic splines in the splines package with the ns function.  How do I go about assigning the knots?  Here's the basic R code:  library(splines) lda.pred &lt;- lda(y ~ ns(x, knots=5))   But I have no idea about how to chose the knots in ns. Submodule of free module over a p.i.d. is free even when the module is not finitely generated? On Ubuntu 18.04, I have connected my laptop to an external display and I am able to set the external display as primary and external display only mode. But when I turn on my laptop or log out from my session the display login screen is displayed only on my(internal) laptop screen. But once I login the display switches to external only and my laptop screen turns off as expected. Is there a way I can make the login screen appear only on the external screen on bootup or on logout as in 16.04? Also the login screen does not follow my cursor as in 16.04. Coincidence, purposeful definition, or something else in formulas for energy In the small amount of physics that I have learned thus far, there seems to be a (possibly superficial pattern) that I have been wondering about.  The formula for the kinetic energy of a moving particle is $\frac{1}{2}mv^2$.  The formula for kinetic rotational energy is $\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2$.  The formula for energy stored in a capacitor is $\frac{1}{2}C \Delta V^2$.  The formula for energy delivered to an inductor is $\frac{1}{2}LI^2$.  Finally, everyone is aware of Einstein's famous formula $e=mc^2$.  I realize there are other energy formulas (gravitational potential energy, for example) that do not take this form, but is there some underlying reason why the formulas above take a similar form? Is it a coincidence? Or is there a motivation for physicists and textbook authors to present these formulas the way they do? Show that any prime ideal from such a ring is maximal. Let R be a commutative ring with an identity such that for all $r\in$ R, there exists some $n&gt;1$ such that $r^n = r$. Show that any prime ideal is  maximal. (Atiyah and MacDonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Chapter 1, Exercise 7.)    Any hints? For example, here are top five accounts in each site (this picture was taken when I was in Biology SE).    As you can see, all the badges are DNA, while Academia's badges should be hats, so on.  What do you think? How to install networkx python in QGIS? How to install and how to compile networkx python on QGIS?  I always get an error that no module named networkx in the console of QGIS I copied the file networkx in C:\Program Files\Quantum GIS Lisboa\apps\Python27\Lib\site-packages and there are not change. Inductive proof of the closed formula for the Fibonacci sequence Fibonacci numbers $f(n)$ are defined recursively:  $f(n) = f(n-1) +f(n-2)$ for $n &gt; 2$ and $f(1) = 1$, $f(2) = 1$. They also admit a simple closed form: $$\sqrt 5 f( n ) = \left(\dfrac{1+ \sqrt 5}{2}\right)^n- \left(\dfrac{1 - \sqrt 5}{2}\right)^n \tag1$$  How to prove (1) using induction?  Remarks One could get (1) by the general method of solving recurrences: look for solutions of the form $f(n)=r^n$, then fit them to the initial values. But there should be a more concrete proof for this specific sequence, using the principle of mathematical induction. Difference between >>> and >> Simple UV Mesh Unwrapping Scale issue I'm having problems using the UV mapping in blender 2.67. Specifically, I am trying to unwrap a really simple mesh, but the UV map is still giving me a net where some of the boxes are completely out of proportion to the others, which causes the texture to stretch horribly. Here is a picture to illustrate:    The mesh only has those three faces you can see in the picture, and the single seam on the front corner. It's a trivially simple mesh, so I really don't understand why the two side faces are being stretched in the UV map to be the same size as the top face. I've tried clicking the average islands scale button as suggested by some of the answers to other questions but that has no effect. It's frustrating because it seems so simple.  Hopefully someone can show me the presumably simple mistake I am making!  Edit: Just to make this clearer, I have already added a seam as the first answer suggests i do. Hopefully this picture will make that clearer, the yellow arrow is pointing to the edge i seamed. The mesh is only three faces so should only need this single seam. The image shows the mesh from infront and behind/underneath so it should make more sense.    Double Edit: One more picture for clarity on the seam issue. The mesh is unfolding correctly, it is just the scale of the unfolded map that is incorrect (in relation to one another)