Unable to delete class due to scheduled job pending, but no scheduled jobs listed
Ghost Schedulable Classes Blocking Deployment
Distributivity of quantifiers over logical connectives Is my Ubuntu vulnerable to SambaCry? I read these two threads:         And I got a little bit worried, is my Ubuntu machine safe? Or am I vulnerable to this vulnerability?  The second article mentioned that:     The flaw actually resided in the way Samba handled shared libraries.   The other thing that they say is all versions from versions 3.5.0 onwards since 2010 are vulnerable.     At that time, nearly 485,000 Samba-enabled computers were found to be exposed on the Internet, and researchers predicted that the SambaCry-based attacks also have potential to spread just like WannaCry ransomware widely.   .   I don't have a samba server however I've got samba-libs package installed.  What, if anything, should I do?  I'm running Ubuntu 16.04. What would be the best approach to get the recordtype id I know of two approaches to get the recordtype id of a particular record type   Use SOQL   RecordType RecType = [Select Id From RecordType  Where SobjectType = 'Account' and DeveloperName = 'Business'];    Benifit here is if the admin changes the name of the record type, the code still works as we can use developer name   Using Describe  Map&lt;String,Schema.RecordTypeInfo&gt; rtMapByName = d.getRecordTypeInfosByName(); Schema.RecordTypeInfo rtByName =  rtMapByName.get('Business');    Saves on SOQL limits but uses a describe call.  What would be your choice and why   EDIT : Usage is for setting up recordtype while inserting records in apex or trigger Are continuous self-bijections of connected spaces homeomorphisms? I hope this doesn't turn out to be a silly question.  There are lots of nice examples of continuous bijections $X\to Y$ between topological spaces that are not homeomorphisms.  But in the examples I know, either $X$ and $Y$ are not homeomorphic to one another, or they are (homeomorphic) disconnected spaces.    My Question: Is there a connected topological space $X$ and a continuous bijection $X\to X$ that is not a homeomorphism?    For the record, my example of a continuous bijection $X\to X$ that is not a homeomorphism is the following.  Roughly, the idea is to find an ordered family of topologies $\tau_i$ ( $i\in \mathbb Z$) on a set $S$ and use the shift map to create a continuous bijection from $\coprod_{i\in \mathbb Z} (S, \tau_i)$ to itself.  Let $S = \mathbb{Z} \coprod \mathbb Z$.  The topology $\tau_i$ is as follows: if $i&lt;0$, then the left-hand copy of $\mathbb Z$ is topologized as the disjoint union of the discrete topology on $[-n, n]$ and the indiscrete topology on its complement, while the right-hand copy of $\mathbb Z$ is indiscrete.  The space $(S, \tau_0)$ is then indiscrete.  For $i&gt;0$, the left-hand copy of $\mathbb Z$ is indiscrete, while the right-hand copy is the disjoint union of the indiscrete topology on $[-n, n]$ with the discrete topology on its complement.  Now the map $\coprod_{i\in \mathbb Z} (S, \tau_i)\to \coprod_{i\in \mathbb Z} (S, \tau_i)$ sending $(S, \tau_i) \to (S, \tau_{i+1})$ by the identity map of $S$ is a continuous bijection, but not a homeomorphism. Zorn's lemma and maximal ideals Let's consider two statements: Zorn's lemma and theorem about existence of maximal ideals in commutative ring with $1$.  It's easy to prove that Zorn's lemma implies existence of maximal ideals.  I wonder if the converse proposition is true, i. e., does existence of maximal ideals implies Zorn's lemma? My approach was to construct a ring structure on an ordered set which satisfies Zorn's lemma condition such that existence of maximal ideal implies existence of maximal element in the set, but I didn't succeed. Why is quantum entanglement considered to be an active link between particles? From everything I've read about quantum mechanics and quantum entanglement phenomena, it's not obvious to me why quantum entanglement is considered to be an active link. That is, it's stated every time that measurement of one particle affects the other.  In my head, there is a less magic explanation: the entangling measurement affects both particles in a way which makes their states identical, though unknown. In this case measuring one particle will reveal information about state of the other, but without a magical instant modification of remote entangled particle.  Obviously, I'm not the only one who had this idea. What are the problems associated with this view, and why is the magic view preferred? If virtual particles sometimes add more mass/energy to a system then was inputed or comes out in the output, how do they not violate conservation of mass/energy. Average distance between two random points in a square I've been trying to play with a rigid body simulations.  I prepared a project of a building made of domino tails. I've placed all objects very tight, but as soon as I start animation it looks like there was some tiny gap between objects, so they all fall down a little bit. For a high building it leads to a construction disaster as the whole building colapses.  Here is an example:  (I'd suggest to use 0.25x speed).  How can I fix it? How does Edo Tensei Madara get back his Rinnegan? Madara gave his Rinnegan to Nagato. But after Kabuto brings him back using Edo Tensei, he still has the Rinnegan. How is this possible? What does the size of the font translate to exactly? I have a 40 pixel font that I'm trying to translate into custom images. I'm trying to match the size of the image exactly, but I'm having some problems getting exactly the right size. Basically, what it comes down to is this. When a font says it is X pixels, what does this physically mean? Age and Graduate school I am 33. I live in the US. I am a neither a US citizen, nor a green card holder. I have worked in various jobs as a research assistant (physics, biology, economics) usually involving programming, mathematics or statistics.  As a newly minted undergraduate, I didn't really have much confidence in myself and I completely ruled out graduate school as pointless.  I didn't think of myself as smart enough.  I drifted into working in labs, because those are some of the easiest ones for which one can get a work permit in the US as a non-American.  Having worked in academia for a while now, I've had a chance to leap into various fields and help build solutions to complex problems.  I think I have literally gone as far as I can go researching in academia with no higher degree.  I work at one of the top universities in the world.  (If you looked at US News rankings or the Academic Ranking of World Universities, it's in the top 5.)  Lately, I've been thinking about applying for graduate school.  I do have a few papers in various fields.  I'm thinking of a PhD in either pure mathematics, applied mathematics, statistics or computer science.   I see two big minuses to applying to graduate school:   Most people applying are more than a decade younger than I am.  (Alas, more than a few gray hairs have made an appearance in recent years.) Perhaps my achievements would look good for someone younger, but partially my achievements are the result of a long career rather than any special brilliance. So, I wonder how my record will be perceived.  I did take GRE and I scored 800 quantitative, 800 verbal and a 5 on the essay.  (I would most likely have to do a GRE subject test depending on what field I ultimately decided.)   Please advise on how accomplished, but older candidates, are viewed in the graduate school application process. Defaulting to the sign-up form? Recently I've noticed more and more sign-in / sign-up workflows defaulting to the sign-up option first and providing a minimal "Sign-In / Login" action somewhere else on the page. What's the reason behind this practice?  Examples where I've seen this recently: How can I eliminate condensation on my toilet tank? My toilet is getting a great deal of condensation on the tank and dripping onto the floor. What can be done to address condensation on the exterior of a toilet tank? Error creating GeoPackage raster store in GeoServer What is the limit of $n \sin (2 \pi \cdot e \cdot n!)$ as $n$ goes to infinity? Do flight attendants prefer I press the button or walk to the back? (Long-haul flights) Non superscript citations for figures Is it possible to reference figures like so   taken from \emph{ref. \cite{reference}}   with non superscript numbers, while leaving the rest of the references in the bulk of the document untouched? This is using BibTeX and the . What experiment would disprove string theory? Nesting HTML- anchor tags