PHP Mysql Prepared statement different result
I have an array of integers, how do I use each one in a mysql query (in php)?
Why did Sirius Black's family live among Muggles? Azure Same Storage on VM The LOTR wiki  Eru Ilúvatar intervened in the history of Arda:   creating Elves and Men removing Aman from the spherical Earth resurrecting Gandalf making Gollum trip      In a letter written by Tolkien, he stated that Eru again intervened, this time in the Third Age, causing Gollum to trip and fall into the fires of Mount Doom while still holding the One Ring, thus destroying it.   Is this correct? If so, what letter is this, and exactly what did Tolkien say? Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL): what can't I do with the Ubuntu application for Microsoft Windows? Change font of formula number in DisplayFormulaNumbered I know that there exists at least one solution, because $ax \equiv b \mod m \implies ax - b = qm$  Rearranging terms gives $ax - qm = b$, and since $d | a$ and $d | m$, so $d | b$ it can be said that $b \equiv 0 \mod d$.  I implemented Euclid's extended algorithm and have been able to experimentally verify that the claim holds, but I do not see a pattern or how I can begin to show there are exactly $d$ solutions.  def euclid_extended(x, y, i=0):   if y == 0:     print("iteration {0} returns ({1}, {2}, {3}) - base case hit with ({4}, {5})".format(i, x, 1, 0, x, y))     return (x, 1, 0)   else:     (d, a, b) = euclid_extended(y, x % y, i + 1)     print("iteration {0}. ({4}, {5}) =&gt; ({1}, {2}, {3})".format(i, d, b, a - b * (x//y), x, y))     return (d, b, a - b * (x//y)) After using the simple LM317 on breadboard variable power supply for a while, a need for a more rugged and reliable bench power supply has arose.    Short on money, i decided to build it as many other amateurs like me did. The thing is that, for my current needs i don't need a giant digitally controlled multi-channel 500 watt beast or something like that.  Instead what i really want is a low wattage positive and negative low voltage ouput -12v-0v-12v for example. However i really like that my power supply to be safe, reliable and fool-proof as far as possible. So after searching the web here and there, i found many designs that from my point of view fell in one of two divisions:-   Ones that use discrete op-amps and transistors. And ones that use integrated voltage regulators.   So -at least for me- i think that the ones with discrete op-amps and transistors are more prone to malfunctions and issues compared to the integrated ones with all of their internal over current and thermal protection circuits which would need to be discretely implemented in the bench power supplies that utilize discrete op-amps, however those designs have the advantage of ease of customization and more importantly that it is easier to have 0V output compared to 1.2V in integrated voltage regulator ones.    So i like advice to help me choose between circuits that utilize discrete op-amps like this circuit for example:-  Or ones that use integrated voltage regulators with their intrinsic robustness and low form factor.    Also as a side but related question i have seen many designs on the web that utilize negative voltage fed to the adjust or like pins to achieve 0V output from integrated voltage regulators like this single positive power supply:-     Or a positive and negative channels power supply that i really like its design because of simplicity (not because of laziness but to avoid the drawbacks that may come with complex designs especially when implemented by an amateur like me):- And the question is      Is it wrong or a system safety and reliability lowering act to feed negative voltage to adjust pin for LM317 for example?     I ask this question because the datasheet clearly states that the working output range is 1.2V-37V for LM317 for example, also no similar circuit is mentioned in the Typical Applications section except for the following one:- And even in that circuit, however the adjust pin is tied to the negative rail, it does't regulate during this interval instead it is shut until the next half wave at least that what i understand.    So at last to sum it up which alternative is best suited for my needs, its pros and cons and suggested circuits if possible. Let's say we have a Python script my_script.py that does some data processing with Blender. This script accepts some arguments (e.g. arg1 arg2). How can I forward arguments to the script when using it with the CLI?  blender --background --python my_script.py   The only trick I could find was :  echo "arg1 arg2" &gt; my_input.txt &amp;&amp; blender --background --python my_script.py   Is this really the only way to do that?  Update  I found a  on Stack Overflow. Let $F$ be a field and $f: \mathbb{Z} \to F$ be a ring epimorphism. How do I make a floor plan with specific dimensions? Minecraft crashes on launch with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION, Problematic frame: ig4dev32.dll or ig4dev64.dll or ig4icd32.dll or ig4icd64.dll I've found  many queries to check edit counts, and I get different results for each one. Which one is the most accurate and up-to-date query? Or is there any way to see the edit count in stats? If gravity is a pseudoforce in general relativity, then why is a graviton necessary? Labelled spanning trees of $K_n-e$ Let $e$ be an edge of $K_n$- the complete graph on $n$ vertices. Prove that the number of labelled spanning trees of $K_n-e$ is $(n-2)n^{n-3}$.  I think the answer lies in using some modified form of Prüfer's sequence but I can't quite nail it. .cache/upstart/Unity7.log growing to consume the entire free disk space. Python cypto suspected Print lines between (and excluding) two patterns I'm going to submit form using cURL, where some of the contents is come from other file, selected using sed  If param1 is line matching pattern from other file using sed, below command will works fine:  curl -d param1="$(sed -n '/matchpattern/p' file.txt)" -d param2=value2 http://example.com/submit   Now, go to the problem. I want show only text between 2 matching pattern excluding the matching pattern itself.  Lets say file.txt contains:  Bla bla bla firstmatch It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. secondmatch The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using 'Content here, content here', making it look like readable English.   Currently, lots of "beetween 2 matching pattern" sed command won't remove firstmatch and secondmatch.  I want the result to become:  It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. Set of branch points isn't discrete, but branch points are isolated? I refer to , which I understand says that the branch points of a nonconstant holomorphic map $F: X \to Y$ between Riemann surfaces $X$ and $Y$, both of which are not necessarily compact, form a discrete subset of range $Y$ of the map $F$. (Not sure if 'connected' is part of the definition of Riemann surfaces in other textbooks, but it is here.) Question 1: Do I understand correctly, and is this indeed true? What else I understand:  $A$ is a discrete subspace/subset (I just assume everything here is the usual subspace topology) of $B$ if and only if every singleton subset of $A$ is open in $A$ if and only if every point of $A$ is isolated.  This overflow question () seems to suggest this is not true but is true if $F$ is proper. However, I'm not sure the definitions of Riemann surface are the same (maybe some answers use definitions where Riemann surfaces are not necessarily connected or something).  2.1. I know $F$ is 'discrete' (meaning that its fibres are discrete; here, i refer to a ): see definition before Lemma 3.1, on p. 7), by Proposition II.3.12, and open, by open mapping theorem, which is Proposition II.3.8, but I'm not sure these help show $F$ is proper or are otherwise helpful. Ostensibly 'discrete' maps don't map discrete subsets to discrete subsets.   This stackexchange question () seems to suggest this is true.  I think this is true if $F$ is injective or at least something like locally injective. (Please don't make me type up all the stuff I did for this part.) However based on the question in (3) and based on the , which I think uses the term 'branch points' to mean the same thing as what Miranda means by 'ramification points' (and thus is different from Miranda's 'branch points'), it seems that no neighbourhood $U$ of a ramification point $p \in U \subseteq X$ of $F$ is such that the restriction $F|_U$ is injective.  Kinda related:    This page () says    Now, the ramification and branch points must form a discrete set  I don't think the page assumes anything like $F$ is proper.  The  text in (2.1) actually seems to assume proper based on the '3.7. Proper holomorphic maps' part, but said part refers to 'Lemma 3.17', so I think proper can be replaced with closed. Maybe $F$ is closed or something.  Kinda related (see Question 2 below):     says    If $F$ is proper then the image $\Delta = F(R)$ is discrete in $Y$.   This seems to have all the same assumptions as with Miranda. Ostensibly, either Miranda is wrong or there's some higher level machinery that allows us to omit $F$ proper.  Question 2: To possibly generalise this, what are the minimum requirements on $F, X$ and $Y$ to make $F$ map discrete subsets to discrete subsets? I mean, I'm not sure we really need 'holomorphic' here. I have a feeling this applies perhaps to maps that are just open/closed, continuous and discrete and spaces that are just Hausdorff and locally compact or something.  (again) Kinda related: The best stack-up possible with a four-layer PCB? I'm designing a 4 layer PCB and I know that the standard stack-up is  Signals GND VCC Singals  (GND and VCC can be switched depending on the layer with more signals) The problem is, I don't really want to connect all ground pins through vias, there are just too many of them ! maybe because I'm not used to 4 layer PCBs, anyway, I've read a  by Henry W. Ott about a different stack-up  GND Signals Signals GND  (Where the power is being routed with wide traces on the signal planes) According to him, this is the best stack-up possible with a four-layer PCB, for the following reasons: 1.Signal layers are adjacent to ground planes. 2.Signal layers are tightly coupled (close) to their adjacent planes. 3.The ground planes can act as shields for the inner signal layers. (I think this requires stitching ??) 4.Multiple ground planes lower the ground (reference plane) impedance of the board and reduce the common-mode radiation. (don't really understand this one) One problem is cross-talk, but I really don't have any signals in the third layer, so I don't think that corss-talk will be an issue with this stack-up,am I correct in my assumption ? Note: The highest frequency is 48MHz, there's a wifi module on the board too. How many Valyrian steel swords are there at the beginning of GoT, and who owns them? How to prove that if $a\equiv b \pmod{kn}$ then $a^k\equiv b^k \pmod{k^2n}$