Which equal correlations of three random variables are possible?
Bound for the correlation of three random variables
Subject-verb inversion / verb-subject-object -- is this correct? I recently read the following in a schoolbook:     Wrote the researchers, "[...]"   I wonder if this is correct English. I have seen it a couple of more times. Is this just a matter of preference? English doesn't really have a very liberal word order, unless you're writing poetry or the like.  Can anyone tell me what this is called? I found some information on subject-verb inversion, but it only seems to be when the object is in front, but in this case, the word order is verb-subject-object. Deep learning model (LSTM) with temporal and non temporal attributes I am trying to filter items with a stored procedure using like. The column is a varchar(15). The items I am trying to filter have square brackets in the name.  For example:  WC[R]S123456.  If I do a LIKE 'WC[R]S123456' it will not return anything.  I found some information on using the ESCAPE keyword with LIKE but I do not understand how to use it to treat the square brackets as a regular string. Prove that $\displaystyle \sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\cdot \large\frac{\binom{n}{r}}{\binom{r+3}{r}} = \frac{3!}{2(n+3)}$   $\bf{My\; Try::}$ We can write $$\frac{\binom{n}{r}}{\binom{r+3}{r}} = \frac{n!}{r!\times (n-r)!}\times \frac{r!\times 3!}{(r+3)!} = \frac{3!\times n!}{(n-r)!\times (r+3)!}$$  So our sum is $$ 3!\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\frac{n!}{(n-r)!\times (r+3)!} = \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\frac{(n+3)!}{(r+3)!\times (n-r)!}$$  So we get Sum $$ \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^r\binom{n+3}{r+3} = -\frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)}\sum^{n}_{r=0}(-1)^{r+3}\binom{n+3}{r+3}$$  $$  = -\frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\left[-\binom{n+3}{3}+\binom{n+3}{4}-\binom{n+3}{5}--.......+(-1)^{n+3}\binom{n+3}{n+3}\right]$$  $$=-\frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\left[\binom{n+3}{0}-\binom{n+3}{1}+\binom{n+3}{2}-\binom{n+3}{3}+\binom{n+3}{4}-\binom{n+3}{5}--.......+(-1)^{n+3}\binom{n+3}{n+3}\right]+\frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\left[\binom{n+3}{0}-\binom{n+3}{1}+\binom{n+3}{2}\right]$$  So we get $$ = \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\left[1-(n+3)+\frac{(n+3)(n+2)}{2}\right] = \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)}\times \frac{n^2+3n+2}{2} = \frac{3!}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\times \frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2} = \frac{3!}{2(n+3)}$$  Can we prove it Using Combinatorial way,bcz above method is very lengthy  If yes then plz explain here  Thanks What is the size of an enum in C? Every subsequence of $x_n$ has a further subsequence which converges to $x$. Then the sequence $x_n$ converges to $x$. Does Thanos's choice make any sense? So we know from Infinity War that Thanos was collecting all the Infinity Stones to basically solve the problems brought about by overpopulation on many planets.  But does it make any sense? He could've just easily increased the resources or changed the area or taken appropriate measure to handle that situation. As far as I know, collecting all the Infinity Stones gives the user limitless power and control over the universe in the MCU.  Is Thanos just a mass murderer or is there something I'm missing? Meta's tag pages inaccessible due to self-redirect loop How can you get the names of method parameters? If I have a method such as:  public void MyMethod(int arg1, string arg2)   How would I go about getting the actual names of the arguments? I can't seem to find anything in the MethodInfo which will actually give me the name of the parameter.  I would like to write a method which looks like this:  public static string GetParamName(MethodInfo method, int index)   So if I called this method with:  string name = GetParamName(MyMethod, 0)   it would return "arg1". Is this possible? How is consensus determined on Meta sites? On our main sites &quot;the best answer&quot; is  as the superposition of the highest voted answer and the accepted answer.  Truth be told, the system is rather insistent on allowing multiple &quot;right answers&quot; and that's one of its strengths: you can be the judge of who you believe. But that doesn't always translate well on the per-site metas, which serve as a sort of policy-creation body.  People who are active on meta help decide how policies are enforced on the main site.  Moderators who have ♦-powers tend to take mandates on meta very seriously.  , accepted answers to meta-questions are no different than any other answer.  Does that leave just votes to determine consensus? Closely related: Not everyone participates on meta-sites.  It can be hard to tell if enough people have looked and voted on questions for real consensus to be declared.  Size of the site determines how many people could be voting on questions.  What counts as a quorum? Finally, sometimes people change their minds about a meta-question, but, , it's not really possible to change one's mind without a pointless edit to someone else's answer.  When should meta-questions be revisited?  On graduated sites, ♦ moderators are elected, which makes them representatives of the active participants, but on beta sites, we are appointed.  It's doubly pressing for beta sites to determine &quot;the will of the people&quot; since part of the point of a beta is to get a working policy framework in place before electing permanent moderators. I'm interested in figuring out how sites already answer these questions and what might be done network-wide to make discovering consensus a little bit easier.  N.B.: Obviously this assumes that consensus matters.  It does to me when I'm making my decisions and I suspect it matters to others.  But that isn't to say that it always makes a difference.  I'm really not interested in answers that hope to use this question as a grindstone for all the axes stored up against certain people who have made unpopular decisions and have the power to make those decisions stick.  Feel free to ask your own question(s).  (Thank you.) I read (or do I say "have read"?) many rules for when to use the present perfect. I found them complex and hard to understand (or do I say "have found"?). I am finding it hard to apply these rules in real sentences.  Is there a simple and clear way to explain the difference between past simple and present perfect? If there is a simple explanation, please tell it! If there is no simple explanation, please tell why it is so complicated. Maybe if I knew why there is no simple explanation, that would help me understand what work I need to do in order to learn the difference. Is $\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}) = \mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})$? Is $\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}) = \mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})$ ?    $$\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})=\{a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6} \mid a,b,c,d\in\mathbf{Q}\}$$   $$\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}) = \lbrace a+b(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}) \mid a,b \in \mathbf{Q} \rbrace  $$  So if an element is in $\mathbf Q(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$, then it is in $\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})$, because $\sqrt{6} = \sqrt{2}\sqrt{3}$.  How to conclude from there? Is $\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n!}{n^n}$ convergent? Is $$d_1\mid n,d_2\mid n\iff [d_1,d_2]\mid n$$ true ? And if yes, how can I prove it ? I recall that $[d_1,d_2]$ is the least common multiple.  My tries  For the implication : Let $d_1\mid n$ and $d_2\mid n$. Then, $d_1d_2\mid n^2$. By the way, since $d_1,d_2\mid n$, we have that $(d_1,d_2)\mid n$ where $(d_1,d_2)=:\gcd(d_1,d_2)$  and thus $$[d_1,d_2](d_1,d_2)\mid n^2.$$  Question: How can I get $[d_1,d_2]\mid n$ from this?  For the converse, since $d_1,d_2\mid [d_1,d_2]\mid n$, the claim follow. Attributing contributions to academic work that occur in Stack Exchange Sometimes we may ask questions on stack exchange or online forums wherein the response is helpful or even essential to a piece of work that gets published in an academic journal. If this occurs, how should credit be given to those involved in the exchange? Should they all be included as authors? Should a link to the forum be included as a reference in the paper?  Once something is in a stack exchange or forum, it's "published". Perhaps in the future, the current peer review model will transform into people writing blogs and posting in forums and databases. But for now, how might this issue be dealt with while forums, blogs, etc coexist with journals? Do the parent directory's permissions matter when accessing a subdirectory? If I have a root folder with some restrictive permission, let's say 600, and if the child folders/files have 777 permission will everybody be able to read/write/execute the child file even though the root folder has 600? After pacman update, pacsearch is no longer installed Markov chains, cellular automata, and raster algebra I need to build a probabilistic cellular automaton for simulating land-use changes and am wondering how to implement this in a GIS. I understand that Markov chains are a way of doing this, and IDRISI has some sort of module for Markov chains, but I have no access to IDRISI.  that, with raster data, this can, in theory, be done with any GIS that can do raster algebra. Presumably this means that it can even be done in ArcGIS, and I think I've figured out how to build cellular automata in ModelBuilder (once I know with certainty how to make iteration work there).  Still, I can find next to no practical advice on this. Once I have two datasets, one showing the land use at a certain point in time (time A) and the other at a later time (time B), I imagine doing the following (correct me if I'm wrong):   If there are (for example) 3 types of land use, then there are 9 possible things that can happen to a cell from time A to time B; thus, reclassify each dataset such that each land use is represented by a different number (for example, 9, 11, and 14 at time A and 3, 4, and 5 at time B); Divide one raster by the other, obtaining a raster with 9 possible cell values. Determine the percentage of cells in the new raster that has each of the 9 values (I forgot, how does one do this in ArcGIS?); those will be the probabilities of each type of change (or lack thereof) in land use.   What I cannot figure out, though, is how to apply these probabilities during the next iteration. Finally, I wonder if there is a way of making an external factor (say, proximity to roads) influence the spatial distribution (not the overall likelihood) of change in my model.  Can anyone recommend where to find information on how to do this in ArcGIS? I want to use do-release-upgrade to upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04, but I can't do that do-release-upgrade Checking for a new Ubuntu release There is no development version of an LTS available.  It seems that  is used, and it still points to 18.04. Do you know when (or how?) can I upgrade to 20.04? Pumping Lemma for $L=\left\{0^i 1^{j} \mid \gcd(i,j) = 1\right\}$ Let $L=\left\{0^i 1^{j} \mid \gcd(i,j) = 1\right\}$ I want to prove that this is not a regular language, but I am having trouble finding a string I can pump resulting in the string not being in the language. Ideally, rather than a full solution, I'd like suggestions for a string that I could use in this proof. I've played with the idea of setting $j = 2$ and $i = 2n+1$, but I don't think that would work.