Logical comparison operators without control statements
How do I evaluate these fork() calls with the && and || operators in C?
iOS navigation bar item image size Let $X_1,X_2,\ldots,X_n$ and $A_1,A_2,\ldots,A_n$ be real numbers taken at random, and $\alpha\gt0$. Show that: $$\sum_{k=1}^n |X_kA_k| \le \frac{1}{\alpha}\sum_{i=1}^n X_k^2 + \frac{\alpha}{4}\sum_{k=1}^n A_k^2$$ Are counters (noun) physical things? Why on the first page Google says there are thousands of results but on the last page there are less than a hundred? com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure is it possible to skip immediately preceding time points? So that, if, for example, you are using model order 2, that is, two time points, but not the two immediately previous time points, but rather, say for example, skipping 2 points, and then using those two points.  So, e.g., it would be y=x(t-3) + x(t-4). Theorem  Let $\{a_n\}$ and $\{b_n\}$ be convergent real sequences. Assume that there exists a $N\in\mathbb{N}$ so  $a_n\le b_n$ (eq. 1)  for all $n\ge N$. Then  $\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n\le \lim_{n\to\infty}b_n$.  My attempt at proving  Let $a=\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n$ and $b=\lim_{n\to\infty}b_n$. $a$ and $b$ are real numbers because the limit of a sequence of real numbers is a real number (which is a corollary in my textbook). For proof by contradiction, assume  $b&lt;a$.  Let $\epsilon=\frac{a-b}{2}$. Then we can find $N_a,N_b\in\mathbb{N}$ so  $|a-a_n|\le\frac{\epsilon}{2}$ when $n\ge N_a$, (eq. 2)  $|b-b_n|\le\frac{\epsilon}{2}$ when $n\ge N_b$. (eq. 3)  In a textbook I found that I should do the following:  Choose a $n$ so $n\ge\max(N,N_a,N_b$), then eqs. (1-3) are satisfied. Then  $a-\epsilon\le a_n+\frac{\epsilon}{2}-\epsilon$  How do I get that last thing? Is it necessary to do a proof by contradiction or can one do a direct proof? Should the weight of question upvotes be reduced? After thinking about    which I declined for the reasons , and    I have a proposal.  How about if question upvotes were only worth +5 rep instead of +10? And this was applied retroactively? (answer upvotes would be unchanged from the current behavior, so this would be question specific.)  This seems to be a better solution to the particular  problem  without all the rather serious negative repercussions of increasing the punitive value and/or cost of downvotes across the board. Related questions with over 99 score display incorrectly How to make my own Dropbox / Ubuntu One server at home? Does anybody know of any resources that can show me how to make my own "Dropbox, Ubuntu One" server at home?  I really like the idea of these services, but I don't want to put my 'stuff' in the clouds. Ideally, it should have a client that runs on Linux and Windows.  I tried to setup iFolder on my Ubuntu 10.04, but without any success so far. What is the design pattern for processing command line arguments Change password on root user and user account Filezilla or WinSCP save password in plain text which is unsecured on public machines. Is there any FTP client can save and encrypt password so that people using it only can access to FTP but not able to see password? Thanks! What word describes random unfitting accusations I really dont know how to describe this. Im having a discussion with someone, I was sharing information that I found on a topic. Randomly im called out as being rude when nowhere was there evidence of rudeness exchanged. This person seems to have a history of claiming people have a problem or are being rude out of the random blue.   Is there a word to describe these random accusations that dont connect to anything? In thinking how to ask this question (somewhat) succinctly, I keep coming back to a Microwave Oven.  A Microwave Oven has a grid of holes over the window specifically designed to be smaller in diameter than the wavelength of the microwaves it produces, yet larger than the wavelengths of the visible light spectrum - this is so you can watch your food being heated without getting an eye full of microwaves.  The "realness" of electromagnetic waves seems indisputable - both from the microwave example above, and also because if I want to broadcast a radio wave with a certain wavelength, then I need to make sure I have an antenna of corresponding length to produce the wave I'm looking for.  Furthermore, we discuss and treat these waves as real, measurable "objects" that exist and can be manipulated.     Now, if I want to describe the behavior of my Microwave Oven in the framework of QM (let's pretend my oven is going to only produce 1 photon of energy corresponding to a wavelength of the microwave spectrum for simplicity) then I'll describe the behavior of that photon as a wavefunction that evolves over time and gives a probability distribution within my microwave that similarly does not allow the photon to pass through the safety grid and exit the oven cavity giving me a retinal burn.  The difference is, the wavefunction is never treated as something "real" in this description.  When the safety grid is described as working to protect you because it has holes smaller than the wavelength of the classical waves it's blocking, this is a useful description that seems to describe "real" objects/be-ables.  While it is possible to describe why an individual photon has low probability of passing through the same grid but extended physical properties such as wavelength (in space) are treated as non-real because we're dealing with a point particle and with behavior described by something we also treat as non-real (the wavefunction); it seems unclear to me why we insist this wave function which predicts behavior of physical measurements so well is somehow "non-real."    Put another way, if we have no problem treating EM waves as "Real," then why do we insist on treating the wavefunction that describes the same behavior as "unreal?"  I understand there is recent research (Eric Cavalcanti and his group for one) trying to argue this point, but as every respectable physics professor, I've ever encountered, has treated the wavefunction as an indisputably non-real mathematical tool, I needed to ask this community for an answer. Software Name: Oracle SQL Developer Version 17.2.0.188  I have three tables: orders, order_details, and products.  I wanted to run a query to update units_in_stock in the products table based on quantity in order_details, where the associated orders row has been marked as shipped, and has a shipping date.  Here's what I tried:  UPDATE Products SET (Products.Unit_In_Stock = Products.Unit_In_Stock - Order_Details.Quantity) INNER JOIN (     Orders INNER JOIN Order_Details ON Orders.Order_ID = Order_Details.Order_ID     ) ON Products.Product_ID = Order_Details.Product_ID WHERE (         ((Orders.Shipped_Date) IS NOT NULL)         AND ((Orders.This_Order_Was_Shipped) = "YES")         );   When I run this, I get:  Error at Command Line : 1 Column : 45   Line 1, Column 45 is the equal sign in the very first statement that said  Products.Unit_In_Stock = Products.Unit_In_Stock - Order_Details.Quantity   Can you help me get this working? How to make generated classes contain Javadoc from XML Schema documentation How can I split an equation over two (or more) lines how to add object to a keyframe range? lets assume we have an iron man pointing his hand to a target and shooting few frames later as shown in the picture below:    frame 0 to 10 he will point frame 11 to 15 he will shoot, which is just a long cube with one larger face to give idea or a laser projectile   how can I add the projectile cube only on frame 11? I don't what it to exist before that  thanks launch an exe/process with stdin stdout and stderr?