pdflatexmk doesn't run makeglossaries for glossaries package (TeXShop, OSX)
How to make Latexmk use makeglossaries?
Any option for mysqldump to ignore databases for backup? YA book about a young powerful female caster attending a school that trains in magical arts and duels I read a young adult novel around the turn of the century. This story features a young female protagonist that is very naturally gifted in magic. She is attending a  to learn mastery and control over her gifts.  A lot of her school revolves around magic dueling. The participants are taught to extend their inner aura like a second magical skin, possibly referred to as creating a shield, or . The user can increase the strength of the shield by focusing harder on it, but doing so means you have less ability to be offensive. The amount of energy needed to create a shield was half the energy a foe would need to focus at you to break it.  Ex: Mage A and B are equally matched. Mage A focuses half his power into a shield. Mage B would then need to focus 100% of his power to break A’s shield.  Another aspect I remember is that when dueling, a school master would extend a personal shield on to one of the combatants as a sort of secondary shield that goes underneath the combatants. When one mage broke the others mages personal shield, the school masters shield protects the losers life from harm, and the breaker of the shield is declared the winner.  I distinctly remember one match in which the protagonist is having a duel with another strong student. She creates a wind storm around herself that picks up the sand from the arena floor and makes her impossible to see and thus makes it hard for her opponent to focus on her shield to break it. She then lashes out at her opponent with incredibly powerful strikes with the final strike being so hard it shatters the opponents shield and then breaks the school masters shield as well and stops just shy of killing her dueling partner.  Any assistance on this one? I think my daughter would love to read it. npm commands not working on WSL with zsh How can we get rid of misspelled and unused (or "zombie") tags? During the re-tagging of questions, tags sometimes become orphaned from existing questions.  Are these zombie tags ever removed from the ?  What if a tag is misspelled and needs to be removed? How do we get rid of it? says:  Bash attempts to determine when it is being run with its standard input connected to a network connection, as when executed by the remote shell daemon, usually rshd, or the secure shell daemon sshd. If Bash determines it is being run in this fashion, it reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists and is readable.  This Bash sources ~/.bashrc: ssh user@host :  But this Bash sources ~/.bash_profile: ssh user@host  I don't see a difference in these two commands according to the spec. Isn't stdin connected to a network connection in both cases? Alternate Row Coloring in Django Template with More Than One Set of Rows Name for categorical product inside a monoid If a monoid is a category with a single object, is there a "monoid-theoretical" concept that the categorical product translates to? As an analogue, in a poset the product translates to the notion of meet (and the coproduct to its dual, the join).  Just by unwinding the definition one can see that this boils down to the existence of two monoid elements $p_1$ and $p_2$ such that for every $x$ and $y$ in the monoid there's a unique element $\langle x,y \rangle$ that factors as $x = p_1\langle x,y \rangle$ and $y = p_2\langle x,y \rangle$; the question is whether the concept is a known and/or useful one.  Incidentally, if the monoid in question is a group then the existence of a product makes the whole thing collapse into the trivial group; this might or not hint that the concept I'm looking for is "too boring" to have a name. In fact it suffices for one of the projections to be right cancellable, or for the pair $\langle x,x\rangle$ to be left cancellable for some $x$, to make the whole thing collapse. What are Multi-Zone/Matrix metering, Center-Weighted metering, and Spot metering? What about Partial?  Is there a good rule of thumb, or a few pointers, on when best to use each exposure metering mode? Let $G$ a group with normal subgroups $M,N$ such that $M\cap N=\{e\}$. Show that if $G$ is generated by $M\cup N$ then $G\cong M \times N$. When are attributive nouns plural? Sorry for the title, it is not very evident and intuitive but I really do not how to tell it better...  Well, you know, several times, or better, many times, we use this form:  If I want to say:      "development of special weapons was   the first point in Hitler's   program..."   I will say this (a better form):      "special weapon development was..."   OK...  is it      "special weapon development"   or      "special weapons development" (note   the plural...)   what's the grammar rule in order to understand how to use this very used form? Setting CSS pseudo-class rules from JavaScript Split Line at Points not splitting at every point in ArcGIS for Desktop? Why does  not split at every point encountered, even if run in an iterative fashion?  Following the suggestions of a thread here and several others, I made a set of points in order to split polylines at specified intervals. In order to do this, I used linear referencing to turn my lines into routes. Then, I exported the attribute table, divided each length by 5, and set points at multiples of 1/5 the length of the line. I used this as the event table to create a layer of events. So, each line has 4 equally spaced points along it, and I thus ultimately need the 5 segments separated by those points.  Curiously, though, when I try to do the second part "Split Line at Point," it seems that only one point is used on a given line at a time, and I'm not sure how it chooses the point (maybe order in its attribute table?) I could run the tool multiple times, but this doesn't seem to solve the problem either. For example, I could see how it would continue splitting segments as more segments are generated, but on e.g. the 4th run I see that some lines are still only split 3 times, even though there is a point within a line segment that was never split and existed before I ran the tool. I'm not sure how the splits are generated, but in any case, it doesn't seem to do what I want it to do, which is produce a split at "each" point.  What should I do to split lines at ALL points along the line? XGBoost Loss function Approximation With Taylor Expansion As an example, take the objective function of the XGBoost model on the $t$'th iteration:  $$\mathcal{L}^{(t)}=\sum_{i=1}^n\ell(y_i,\hat{y}_i^{(t-1)}+f_t(\mathbf{x}_i))+\Omega(f_t)$$  where $\ell$ is the loss function, $f_t$ is the $t$'th tree output and $\Omega$ is the regularization. One of the (many) key steps for fast calculation is the approximation:  $$\mathcal{L}^{(t)}\approx \sum_{i=1}^n\ell(y_i,\hat{y}_i^{(t-1)})+g_tf_t(\mathbf{x}_i)+\frac{1}{2}h_if_t^2(\mathbf{x}_i)+\Omega(f_t),$$  where $g_i$ and $h_i$ are the first and second derivatives of the loss function.   What I'm asking for is convincing arguments to demystify why the above approximation works:  1) How does XGBoost with the above approximation compare to XGBoost with the full objective function? What potentially interesting, higher-order behavior is lost in the approximation?  2) It's a bit hard to visualize (and depends on the loss function) but, if the loss function has a large cubic component, then the approximation will likely fail. How is it that this doesn't cause problems for XGBoost? Why does Skynet take prisoners? In the Terminator franchise, extermination camps are often mentioned. But from a machine-logic POV, wouldn't it make more sense to just kill all humans on sight, period? Or herd them into small areas and nuke them? (even today's military electronics are hardened against EMPs and Skynet wouldn't care about the environment.)   IIRC, the reasoning behind ghettoization / concentration camps / extermination camps / gas "showers" is to misdirect or mislead people both inside and outside the country as to what was really going on. But Skynet doesn't have to worry about bad publicity, and can manufacture all the free labor it needs. Is there any in-universe explanation for keeping large groups prisoners? Can PostGIS and QGIS provide dependable multi-user editing? After considering a few options, I'm trying to give my 15-20 QGIS 2.2 users the ability to concurrently view/edit one or two basic point PostGIS layers, largest one has just 16,000 records. I've installed PostgreSQL 9.1 / PostGIS 2.0 and basic testing seems to work ok but haven't unleashed it to the masses yet.  We'll typically only have 2-3 editors at a time, but possibly 15 viewers. Edits will all be in QGIS, viewers will be QGIS and ArcGIS (but we don't have SDE).  As I said, these are just basic point files, and  edits will just be adding/deleting points and some table edits. I am not worried about editing the same features at the same time.  Can the combination provide dependable multi-user editing for two basic point files? Show $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt[3]{2}]$ is a field by rationalizing What tool do you use to monitor your servers? I need to enter the command line alone with no GUI to install the official NVIDIA drivers. I'm trying to get my computer to work over HDMI and someone on Youtube shows how but you have to be in the Nvidia settings program. The classical book on commutative algebra Introduction to Commutative Algebra, by Atiyah and Macdonald, has the following as exercise I.11.       A ring is Boolean if $x^2=x$ for any $x$ of $A$. In a Boolean ring $A$, show that     i) $2x=0$ for all $x\in A$;    ii) Every prime ideal of $A$ is maximal, and its residue field consists of two elements;   iii) Every finitely generated ideal of $A$ is principal.     I can but solve the first two of them; for the last one, I cannot even perceive the situation here, for it will not, generally speaking, be a Dedekind domain, whereof my knowledge is somewhat more. I have hitherto tried to find one element for each ideal of two generators which can stand the stead of them, and then proceed by induction. But even the first step fails to produce any result. Thanks for any hints and inspirations in advance. I have an ex who has posted nude photos of me online in the past, linked to my online social media, and posted my full name and where I live. I am concerned he may do so again once he finds out I'm now in a PhD program (he's very jealous of any success I have), and may link to my school bio page, or worse.   Revenge porn is illegal in my state, and the case against him is currently pending. I have also gotten the photos taken down with a DMCA letter (I hold the copyright over the photos in question). At this point, I am concerned with how a future attempt could affect my career.  I can handle the embarrassment now that I've been through it once, so if that's the biggest concern, I can deal. I just don't want to lose a career over it, given how small academia really is and how a reputation might follow one around.  My question is, if I don't change my name (I've considered this, assuming I can keep him from finding out) and my photos are circulated and discovered by faculty or students, how likely am I to be thrown out of my PhD program or later lose a job as an untenured prof? Is a name change worth it?   (If it makes any difference, they are essentially just topless portraits; I'm not engaged in any sexual activity or anything weird, and were taken 10 years ago when I was very young and foolish.)