How to undo git reset --hard
How can I undo git reset --hard HEAD~1?
I have 2-3 different column names that I want to look up in the entire DB and list out all tables which have those columns. Any easy script? Why are there no byte or short literals in Java? I can create a literal long by appending an L to the value; why can't I create a literal short or byte in some similar way? Why do I need to use an int literal with a cast?  And if the answer is "Because there was no short literal in C", then why are there no short literals in C?  This doesn't actually affect my life in any meaningful way; it's easy enough to write (short) 0 instead of 0S or something. But the inconsistency makes me curious; it's one of those things that bother you when you're up late at night. Someone at some point made a design decision to make it possible to enter literals for some of the primitive types, but not for all of them. Why? I have a complicated integral to solve. I tried to split ($101 x$) and proceed but I am getting a pretty nasty answer while evaluating using parts. are there any simpler methods to evaluate this integral?  $$ \int\!\sin (101x)\cdot\sin^{99}(x)\, dx $$ Do Mandalorians truly never remove their helmets? In episode 3 of The Mandalorian, it is said that Mandalorians never remove their helmets for any reason. Really? Not even to sleep or bathe? Is there any canonical source for this idea? I’m going to assume that the “never” implies “Never removes their helmets in public…” right?  But in flashback scenes to the Mandalorian’s childhood, nobody is really pictured wearing Mandalorian armor let alone helmets. They simply seemed like basic humans who might just be unified by wearing maroon wardrobes all the time.  So what is the deal with this claim? What is the canonical context of the claim?      Looking for in-universe, canonical explanations; not armchair speculation and theories. If none (currently) exist, legends explanation would suffice. Regardless, please provide references and context. Attribute editing in QGIS on geoJson file We have vector files in the format of geoJson files. We need to keep it in geoJson format as it is picked up by mobile devices via Restful services.  The problem is we want to change the attributes of the features in QGIS but it seems like this is not possible. We don't have to add or remove columns. We simply need to edit the existing data.  Is there a work around for this?  Are there any plugins that I can download that will allow me to do this in QGIS? How can I use colours to separate texture node treatment? I'd like to do three things:  Make the Red area glossy Make the Green area roughly diffuse Make the Green area appear higher than/on top of the red area (bump height).  Basically I'm looking for a procedural/node technique I can use to treat areas separated by color (or alpha). In the pictured set-up I'm using red and green (as I thought splitting colors to RGB could be a solution), but I'd like the solution to be used with any colors required. Any clues would be gratefully appreciated :) I am trying to find the correct opposite of a delegate in the context of a person being a representative of someone else that have allowed or chosen them to be their delegate. What would you call that "someone else?" The only word I could find is a delegator (which isn't a real word in English) or assigner, but they are technical words rather than descriptive.    Any other word I could use?    Think of it in a sentence like this:       Here is a list of all the delegates in the company.   But that is the list of their _ _ _ _ _ (what can go here?).   I am trying to avoid fillers such as:  bosses, agents, managers, etc. Should I upgrade to the "mainline" kernels? Alright so I've seen some postings about loop cuts and done some research. I am very new to blender and modeling overall. I am trying to loop cut this concrete barrier. Now I'm following a tutorial and kind of did my own thing in some areas. I cleaned it up following some instructions in another answer here on stack exchange.  I can't for the life of me figure out why I can loop cut around the whole bottom:   ...but not the whole middle:   I see this marked as answered by another question. That question refers to ngons and inside faces. Now once again I'm totally new to this. I looked on the inside. I don't believe I have inside faces or any ngons by the terms I've read online in my research.  Here is a wireframe picture and the inside view:     Maybe I'm missing something the answers on other posts are saying. If so and you know what it is I'd be very appreciative of what it is. Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer) Find the volume common to two circular cylinders, each with radius r, if the axes of the cylinders intersect at right angles. (using disk/washer)  I saw no example of this problem anywhere.. I saw an example how to solve it without calculus but I'm afraid that'll be deductions on my test.. I have the volume of a cylinder and the method of area between two curves but this is out of my reach.... I don't know what I can try... The event horizon of a black hole is where gravity is such that not even light can escape. This is also the point I understand that according to Einstein time dilation will be infinite for a far-away-observer.  If this is the case how can anything ever fall into a black hole.  In my thought experiment I am in a spaceship with a powerful telescope that can detect light at a wide range of wavelengths.  I have it focused on the black hole and watch as a large rock approaches the event horizon.  Am I correct in saying that from my far-away-position the rock would freeze outside the event horizon and would never pass it? If this is the case how can a black hole ever consume any material, let alone grow to millions of solar masses.  If I was able to train the telescope onto the black hole for millions of years would I still see the rock at the edge of the event horizon?  I am getting ready for the response of the object would slowly fade.  Why would it slowly fade and if it would how long would this fading take?  If it is going to red shift at some point would the red shifting not slow down to a standstill? This question has been bugging me for years!  OK - just an edit based on responses so far.  Again, please keep thinking from an observers point of view.  If observers see objects slowly fade and slowly disappear as they approach the event horizon would that mean that over time the event horizon would be "lumpy" with objects invisible, but not passed through?  We should be able to detect the "lumpiness" should we not through? What is the word that is used to describe the oversimplification or non-academic discussion of a complex issue?   Typically, I'm looking for a word like pedantic, or puerile, except that the word covers the fact that the discussion is particularly non-academic. I know that such a word exists since I have used it before, but it has skipped my mind. Show "Insufficient Privileges" directly when clicking 'Edit' (override), not on 'Save' If a user clicks 'Edit' on an opportunity which he isn't allowed to edit, the "Insufficient Privileges" page directly appears. This is good. If a user clicks 'Edit' on a custom object (which has an edit override that points to a visualforce page), he first sees the form without problems, and the "Insufficient Privileges" page only appears when he tries to save it. This behaviour is misleading for the users, because they think they can manipulate the data and put effort into it, and only afterwards they realize that this wasn't possible after all.  An idea was to check at page load if the user has edit permissions and otherwise redirect him to the "Insufficient Privileges" page.  Might there be another way? Thanks! Part of a fingernail known as the  is informally known as the "quick".  It is referenced in the saying "cut to the quick".  What is the etymology of the word quick as in reference to the fingernail? I think the title says it. Did expansion of the universe steal the energy somehow? Is short-circuiting logical operators mandated? And evaluation order? Does the ANSI standard mandate the logical operators to be short-circuited, in either C or C++?  I'm confused for I recall the K&amp;R book saying your code shouldn't depend on these operations being short circuited, for they may not. Could someone please point out where in the standard it's said logic ops are always short-circuited? I'm mostly interested on C++, an answer also for C would be great.  I also remember reading (can't remember where) that evaluation order isn't strictly defined, so your code shouldn't depend or assume functions within an expression would be executed in a specific order: by the end of a statement all referenced functions will have been called, but the compiler has freedom in selecting the most efficient order.  Does the standard indicate the evaluation order of this expression?  if( functionA() &amp;&amp; functionB() &amp;&amp; functionC() ) cout&lt;&lt;"Hello world"; I know I use them, and my peers use them, but how much does the average user actually use tooltips to figure out functionality? Modern movie where rich people can buy a personal assistant that sit in a small egg This is a modern movie and rich people can buy this egg with a personal assistant. It's an actual person in it (or a person's mind). I believe it can even operate a toaster.  I believe later in the movie, a person (or their mind) can be transferred to such an egg. As a punishment, they increase the speed of time inside that egg to make the person inside the egg bored to death, so to speak. I'm very confused about tenses.  I have examples in two different situations here. Situation 1: I went to New York two months ago and was talking to someone about it.  A. This is the first time I've been to New York. B. That was the first time I'd been to New York.  Which is correct in a daily conversation?  Situation 2: I'm going to New York next month and talking to someone.  A. This will be the first time I've been to New York. B. This is the first time I've been to New York. C. This will be the first time I go to New York.  Which sentence is appropriate?  According to a grammar article I've read before, I think it says that I can use this sentence in both cases:  This is the first time I've been to New York.  But I'm not sure if this is really so. So I'd like to know which tense I should use in each case. Could you explain it? Why is the sum of two random variables a convolution?