How install driver for Wireless?
Wireless disabled by hardware switch on an Asus X550V
I haven't played Magic: the Gathering since the days of Onslaught and Mirrodin, and I would like to try to catch back up. Since all my cards are quite dated now, I may be more interested in formats other than the most up-to-date one.  Rather than ask what is currently legal in various formats (since that is likely too localized), I would rather pose the question of how can I tell which sets/cards are legal in each format. Convert file contents to lower case I have temp file with some lower-case and upper-case contents.  Input  Contents of my temp file:  hi Jigar GANDHI jiga   I want to convert all upper to lower.  Command  I tried the following command:  sed -e "s/[A-Z]/[a-z]/g" temp   but got wrong output.  Output  I want it as:  hi jigar gandhi jiga   What needs to be in the substitute part of argument for sed? Is there a fast way (without looping over all edges/faces/verts) using ops.mesh or bmesh to get the lists of indices associated with mesh islands as shown below? These islands are part of one mesh but are disjoint from each other.    I know how to select the boundaries by running the operator Select boundary Loop or calling bpy.ops.mesh.region_to_loop() but can't find any API calls to return the vert/edge/face indices associated with the individual islands. Where can I send feature requests? Ping is a a program owned by root with the user id bit set.  $ ls -l `which ping` -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 35752 Nov  4  2011 /bin/ping   As I understand it, if a user runs the ping process, then the effective user id will change from the real user id (i.e. the user id of the person who launched the process) to the user id root. However when I try this and look at the output of ps to see if the ping process is running as the root user, I still get the real user id showing.  ps -e -o user,ruser,euser,cmd,args | grep ping sashan   sashan   sashan   ping -i 10 -c 1000 www.goog ping -i 10 -c 1000 www.google.com $C([0, 1])$ is not complete with respect to the norm $\lVert f\rVert _1 = \int_0^1 \lvert f (x) \rvert \,dx$ Post Problem Analysis - Rod in a cylindrical time varying magnetic field? A metal rod of length $l$ is placed (as shown in figure) in a cylindrical time varying magnetic field. Find the potential difference across it.   My answer:  As electric fields as forming circles around the centre with magnitude $$\frac12r\frac{dB}{dt}$$ whose magnitude is same along any chord at a fix distance from centre: $$\Delta V=E.l=\frac12r\frac32at^{\frac12}.l$$ $$\Delta V=\frac34arlt^{\frac12}$$  My question: Is $\Delta V =V_M-V_N$ or $\Delta V=V_N-V_M$ $\bf OR$ equivalently which side is at high potential?  Possible    $(i)$ As Field lines are circular from $M$ to $N$, $M$ must be high potential. $(ii)$ As this field line apply a force on electrons- in the rod- towards left, then $M$ must have excess $e^-$ and $N$ must have deficiency; so $N$ would be high potential as $M$ is $(+)$ and $N$ is $(-)$. Is there a password manager for Ubuntu What is the most popular open source password manager which I can use on a Ubuntu machine or preferably across Ubuntu/Windows machines with some form of data compatibility. If there is a free web based version, that would be even more preferable. Why is my Wi-Fi connection speed much slower than a wired connection? When I plug my laptop via LAN cable and check speed on speedtest.net I have over 32 Mb/sec. When I unplug the cable and connect to the same router I have less than 15 Mb/sec. I tried to change channels already but this didn't help. I'm sitting just near the router.   What can it be? The router is a Dlink 400. An incorrect answer for an integral As the authors pointed out in  (p. 2), the following evaluation which was in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (sixth edition) is incorrect (and has been removed). $$ ''\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\left(1+x^{2}\right)^{3/2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+  \frac{4 x^{2}}{3\left(1+x^{2}\right)^{2}}+\sqrt{1+  \frac{4 x^{2}}{3\left(1+x^{2}\right)^{2}}}}} \mathrm{d}x = \frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{6}}'' \qquad (*) $$ A numerical evaluation gives $0.6663771 \cdots$ on the left hand side and $0.64127491 \cdots $ on the right hand side.  I have not succeeded to correct $(*)$.  Do you have any idea on how to evaluate the above integral? Address is invalid on local machine [on windows 8 only] Remove "Set as desktop background" from Windows context menu Why can't we see the selected reasons when there are pending close votes for a question? When users vote to close a question, the original poster can't see the selected reason why until after the question is already closed.  If they could see this information, they might be able to edit the question to make it more acceptable and averting the need to close it.  For example, the owner of this  cannot see the reason why his question is being voted to close: Why can we distinguish different pitches in a chord but not different hues of light? In music, when two or more pitches are played together at the same time, they form a chord. If each pitch has a corresponding wave frequency (a pure, or fundamental, tone), the pitches played together make a , which is obtained by simple addition. This wave is no longer a pure sinusoidal wave.  For example, when you play a low note and a high note on a piano, the resulting sound has a wave that is the mathematical sum of the waves of each note. The same is true for light: when you shine a 500nm wavelength (green light) and a 700nm wavelength (red light) at the same spot on a white surface, the reflection will be a superposition waveform that is the sum of green and red.  My question is about our perception of these combinations. When we hear a chord on a piano, we’re able to discern the pitches that comprise that chord. We’re able to “pick out” that there are two (or three, etc) notes in the chord, and some of us who are musically inclined are even able to sing back each note, and even name it. It could be said that we’re able to decompose a Fourier Series of sound.  But it seems we cannot do this with light. When you shine green and red light together, the reflection appears to be yellow, a “pure hue” of 600nm, rather than an overlay of red and green. We can’t “pick out” the individual colors that were combined. Why is this?  Why can’t we see two hues of light in the same way we’re able to hear two pitches of sound? Is this a characteristic of human psychology? Animal physiology? Or is this due to a fundamental characteristic of electromagnetism? Move the Add Favorite / Ignored Tags boxes to the top It seems that most people who use the ignored tags feature end up with a fairly long list of those tags.  Although , it is sometimes necessary to add new ignored tags manually (typically when adding some-tag*).  It would be a lot easier if the add box was above the long list of ignored tags rather than below. I suppose the same would apply to the favorites tags for consistency's sake. Hey I want to connect the bottom loop with the top loop so that it forms a solid.  I have tried selecting multiple vertices and pressing F but that just creates a large face which I do not want. I have tried using grid fill bu that doesn't work either. The solution that seems to work is by selecting four vertices and pressing F and then selecting the next 4 and pressing F and on and on. That just takes too long. Fibonacci combinatorial identity: $F_{2n} = {n \choose 0} F_0 + {n\choose 1} F_1 + ... {n\choose n} F_n$ Can someone explain how to prove the following identity involving Fibonacci sequence  $F_n$  $F_{2n} = {n \choose 0} F_0 + {n\choose 1} F_1 + ... {n\choose n} F_n$ ? Identical creatures entering the battlefield If I have two cards called  in hand and I play my first, Sin Collector (A). I use its triggered ability.   "When Sin Collector enters the battlefield, target opponent reveals his or her hand. You choose an instant or sorcery card from it and exile that card."  Now, I play Sin Collector (B), I use B's triggered ability.  But now my question. Does Sin Collector (A)'s ability trigger again as well? 'Sin Collector' entered the battlefield again, right? I'm writing a Python application that takes as a command as an argument, for example:  $ python myapp.py command1   I want the application to be extensible, that is, to be able to add new modules that implement new commands without having to change the main application source. The tree looks something like:  myapp/     __init__.py     commands/         __init__.py         command1.py         command2.py     foo.py     bar.py   So I want the application to find the available command modules at runtime and execute the appropriate one.  Python defines an __import__ function, which takes a string for a module name:     __import__(name, globals=None, locals=None, fromlist=(), level=0)      The function imports the module name, potentially using the given globals and locals to determine how to interpret the name in a package context. The fromlist gives the names of objects or submodules that should be imported from the module given by name.       Source:    So currently I have something like:  command = sys.argv[1] try:     command_module = __import__("myapp.commands.%s" % command, fromlist=["myapp.commands"]) except ImportError:     # Display error message  command_module.run()   This works just fine, I'm just wondering if there is possibly a more idiomatic way to accomplish what we are doing with this code.  Note that I specifically don't want to get in to using eggs or extension points. This is not an open-source project and I don't expect there to be "plugins". The point is to simplify the main application code and remove the need to modify it each time a new command module is added. Motivation  I want to include a list of related equations, say, for a proof, in my LaTeX document. As far as I know, I have two good options, eqnarray and align.   Question  What is the difference between eqnarray and align, and how do I know which I should be using? Or does it matter at all?