Traveler who aims to travel faster to reach better places
Story about building up speed leading to increased quality of life
What is the difference between a neural network and a deep neural network, and why do the deep ones work better? I haven't seen the question stated precisely in these terms, and this is why I make a new question.  What I am interested in knowing is not the definition of a neural network, but understanding the actual difference with a deep neural network.  For more context: I know what a neural network is and how backpropagation works. I know that a DNN must have multiple hidden layers. However, 10 years ago in class I learned that having several layers or one layer (not counting the input and output layers) was equivalent in terms of the functions a neural network is able to represent (see Cybenko's ), and that having more layers made it more complex to analyse without gain in performance. Obviously, that is not the case anymore.  I suppose, maybe wrongly, that the differences are in terms of training algorithm and properties rather than structure, and therefore I would really appreciate if the answer could underline the reasons that made the move to DNN possible (e.g. mathematical proof or randomly playing with networks?) and desirable (e.g. speed of convergence?) Parameter evaluation order before a function calling in C Can it be assumed a evaluation order of the function parameters when calling it in C ? According to the following program, it seems that there is not a particular order when I executed it.   #include &lt;stdio.h&gt;  int main() {    int a[] = {1, 2, 3};    int * pa;      pa = &amp;a[0];    printf("a[0] = %d\ta[1] = %d\ta[2] = %d\n",*(pa), *(pa++),*(++pa));    /* Result: a[0] = 3  a[1] = 2    a[2] = 2 */     pa = &amp;a[0];    printf("a[0] = %d\ta[1] = %d\ta[2] = %d\n",*(pa++),*(pa),*(++pa));    /* Result: a[0] = 2  a[1] = 2     a[2] = 2 */     pa = &amp;a[0];    printf("a[0] = %d\ta[1] = %d\ta[2] = %d\n",*(pa++),*(++pa), *(pa));    /* a[0] = 2  a[1] = 2 a[2] = 1 */  } In Newtonian mechanics, if we throw an object in against direction of gravity with speed $v$ and it achieve max height of $h$. Now if we allow object to fall from that height $h$, it will eventually attain speed $v$ when it reach position where we launch it.   Now applying same idea to a black hole in general relativity. Speed require to escape black hole gravity is greater than $c$, so if we throw something into black hole with almost the speed of light, the object speed will exceed speed of light $c$ before hitting black hole surface! How relativity explain this? Can space-time curvature reduce speed of this freely falling object from attaining speed of light? while working with webservice quotes are not inserting may i know what i have to do. my code is     for(integer l=0;l&lt;reqquotes;l++){          qu = new Quote();          qu.Name = qName;          //opp.CloseDate =system.today();           qList.add(qu);             insert oppList;          insert qList;     } I've looked at the resumes of the type of candidates that get into computer science PhD programs at the top few universities (e.g. Stanford, MIT etc.) and a lot of them seem to have multiple publications (2-4) done during their undergraduate years. Is this representative of the entire pool? Or is this just a self-selected group that puts their resumes online.  I currently have one first-author workshop paper (5 pages), and I wonder how this might affect my chances at entry into these top universities. Does Overhand Chop override the damage bonus from wielding a two handed weapon? I was showing a GM friend of mine a build I was making that uses the Two-Handed Fighter Archetype and we are both unsure of how it interacts with the damage bonus you get from two-handed weapons (which is 1-1/2 times your STR.) It reads:     Overhand Chop (Ex): At 3rd level, when a two-handed fighter makes a single attack (with the attack action or a charge) with a two-handed weapon, he adds double his Strength bonus on damage rolls. This ability replaces armor training 1.   So, does Overhand Chop turn the 1-1/2 times multiplier from two-handed weapons into a 2 times multiplier, or do the two add up? Or, do they interact in some other way?   This assumes a Medium sized character with 20 STR and a greatsword with 3 levels. How can I replace Windows with Ubuntu? Frobenius Inequality Rank I was looking for an answer for this problem in terms of matrices, but I really don't know how to prove this result. The proposition says that:  Let $A\in M_{m\times k}(\mathbb{C})$, $B\in M_{k\times p}(\mathbb{C})$ and $C\in M_{p\times n}(\mathbb{C})$, then $\textrm{rank}(AB)+\textrm{rank}(BC)\leq \textrm{rank}(B)+\textrm{rank}(ABC)$ What's the best way of checking if an object property in JavaScript is undefined? Implementing a sort of "tightened frenchspacing" By default, (La)TeX adds extra space between sentences. The exact rules are in the TeXbook, a summary by TH. can be found . What follows is is my "executive summary":   After any period (or quotation/exclamation mark) that doesn't follow a capital letter, TeX adds a font's "extra space" to the "normal (interword) space". For Computer Modern 10pt, the normal space is 3.33pt and the extra space 1.11pt, resulting in an intersentence space of 4.44pt (+33% compared to the nomal space, assuming no stretch and shrink). A sentence end after a capital letter is indicated by the \@ command: Ann is learning the ABC\@. To denote that a period after a lowercase letter doesn't end a sentence, one may use \@ as well as an explicit space: Prof.\@ Higgins or Prof.\ Higgins.   Intersentence spacing may be brought in line with normal spacing by issuing the \frenchspacing command. (This is the standard setting for certain languages, e.g. the  (n)german option of the babel package.) With \frenchspacing enabled, there's no need to use the \@ command. One may revert to (La)TeX's default behavour by issuing \nonfrenchspacing.  So, there's the choice between extra intersentence spacing and uniform spacing. What is missing in my opinion is a third option I'll call "tightened frenchspacing": normal (interword) spacing between sentences and decreased spacing after non-sentence ending periods. To be somewhat more precise (while still ignoring stretch and shrink), I envision the following:   Adhering to a font's ratio between "normal space" and "normal space plus extra space" (3:4 for Computer Modern), the intersentence space is set to the normal space. The space after non-sentence ending periods equals the normal space multiplied by the above ratio (resulting in a space of 2.5pt for Computer Modern). As with \nonfrenchspacing in effect, the \@ command is used to denote cases of special punctuation.   How should such a "tightened frenchspacing" option be implemented?  EDIT: Thanks to Mico for providing what may well be a stepping stone to a solution. Here's another attempt at clarification:   Simply reducing the spacing after any period is not what I had in mind. There should be a (tangible) difference between end-of sentence spaces and spaces after non-sentence-ending periods (only that the latter should be reduced instead the former augmented). If adhering to a font's normal space/extra space ratio is not possible, a solution that adds a fixed (reduced) space (say, a thin space) after non-sentence-ending periods will be accepted. For compatibility reasons, I'd prefer a solution that works with the traditional use of \@ (i.e allows "tightened frenchspacing" for existing documents without the need to change the document body). Should it turn out that a different set of "special punctuation" macros is needed, I'll accept this as a solution. E2099 Overflow in conversion or arithmetic operation Prove: If $a\mid m$ and $b\mid m$ and $\gcd(a,b)=1$ then $ab\mid m$ Prove: If $a\mid m$ and $b\mid m$ and $\gcd(a,b)=1$ then $ab\mid m$  I thought that $m=ab$ but I was given a counterexample in a comment below.  So all I really know is $m=ax$ and $m=by$ for some $x,y \in \mathbb Z$. Also, $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime since $\gcd(a,b)=1$.   One of the comments suggests to use , i.e., $aq+br=1$ for some $q,r\in\mathbb{Z}$. Any more hints?  New to this divisibility/gcd stuff. Thanks in advance! Soft Thresholding CUDA implementation Why is the "user was removed" message so vague? YA dystopia novel of battle school with unusual military control scheme Some sort of battle school (no, not Ender's Game), where teens are being trained as military commanders.   The control system for their army hinges around some sort of system that requires extremely fine motor control -- being able to "push" around digital representations of military units using a special interface that interprets minute finger movements.  The boy protagonist eventually meets a girl in the battle school, and is astonished to learn that most people do not live as well as he does -- for instance, he gets a fresh jumpsuit outfit every day and disposes of the old one; this is a luxury.  One scene I recall is them kissing for a moment in some sort of underground passageway; the boy protagonist notes the exact length of the kiss, as he has been trained to have heightened time perception.  I don't recall much about other commander characters; I think they have different special abilities, and one other major character might have physical deformities, possibly because of postwar-radiation-related birth defects.  They have been training for an upcoming, prearranged final battle between all the existing national governments; the military units are very possibly robotic or entirely digital in nature, so as to avoid wasting materiel / human life.    They ultimately win the battle, just barely; I think the girl protagonist gives them an edge in the competition by hacking the timing / control system in favor of their team, causing a discrepancy which only the boy protagonist notices due to his heightened perceptions.  It was agreed that the winning government gets dominion over one of the few islands of land left that was not irradiated in some previous war; the protagonists get to live there as a reward for their victory.  I believe the boy protagonist later realizes he's gradually losing his ability to exactly quantify the passage of time.  Published no later than 2004, likely somewhere between 1980-2000, probably sometime in the '90s. Proving that $\frac{\phi^{400}+1}{\phi^{200}}$ is an integer. How do we prove that $\dfrac{\phi^{400}+1}{\phi^{200}}$ is an integer, where $\phi$ is the golden ratio?  This appeared in an answer to a  I asked previously, but I do not see how to prove this.. How to prove $D^n/S^{n-1}\cong S^n$? In my textbook it is said that the quotient space $D^n/S^{n-1}$ is homeomorphic to $S^n$. I can imagine it for $n=2$, but fail to make a mathematical proof for any dimension.  Can anyone provide a rigorous proof? Explanation of the binomial theorem and the associated Big O notation Driver locked memory on a non-virtual machine What component to use for audio signal switching? I'm looking to build a guitar pedal switcher based on a Raspberry Pi or Arduino (have not yet decided, but I have an unused Raspberry around and I lean towards that). Anyway, digital logic.  Now, I need to switch audio signal obviously and I need to do it quietly (both physical silence and electrical silence). Please note that the signal is line level throughout most of the build, except for the input which is much lower. I will probably have 2 or 3 loops before the preamp so those may not encounter line level signal.  From what I read and know, so far, mechanical relays are not really an option due to the clicking noise they make. I also read something about FETs, but that's a bit out of my league and I would appreciate any info on these.  PS: I will probably use different power rails for the digital and analog paths.  PS2: The whole thing will be mounted in a 1U rack enclosure, so please tell me if I should take into consideration any thermal issues.