Compound nouns vs possessive (of)
Attributive nouns vs. of-genitive
When I write C++ code for a class using templates and split the code between a source (CPP) file and a header (H) file, I get a whole lot of "unresolved external symbol" errors when it comes to linking the final executible, despite the object file being correctly built and included in the linking.  What's happening here, and how can I fix it? Last year I hired someone to do some work for our website but accidentally lost the PSD files since then. It's a fairly basic concept but I am fairly inexperienced with using masks.  How can I create the black circular gradient area as shown in this image below? I need to get as close as possible where it matches existing images on the site, why I am hoping its not too hard.  Thank you! Why does TeX Live "require" yearly updates? Every year TeX Live provides a new version. My recollection is that soon after a new version is released, the old version's tlmgr stops fetching updates to packages. They provide  with the disclaimer     This procedure is not bullet-proof, or especially recommended   There is no upgrade path for Windows. Looking at the , it is not clear to me what is actually changing between releases such that a full new install is required/recommended. I always thought of TeX Live as providing useful binaries (e.g., pdflatex, biber, and makeindex) and a convenient way of updating  packages. What am I missing? Why does TeX Live need a new install every year? How to avoid becoming stressed while playing endurance games? Although I am asking for Super Hexagon, I've noticed there is a multitude of games (rhythm games in particular) where the more stressed I am, the worse I play and/or are more likely to make a mistake. Often then the games are designed in such a way to induce stress, such as various ways of telling me how far I am, which also is telling me just how much it would suck if I were to fail right now.  This leads to a stress cycle, where I am noticing I am stressed, and I am aware of this being a bad thing, which makes me more stressed, over and around until I eventually fail.  This often means that I probably could've done &lt;some new level I just unlocked&gt; just fine, except I saw that it was new, got stressed about it and started the stress cycle.  So how can I:   Avoid getting stressed while playing Defuse the stress cycle once it has inevitably started   One thought I had for this is simply taking deep breaths, but particularly in Super Hexagon, there is no way to pause and taking deep breaths is distracting enough to make me fail. Propose Newbie-Overflow site or section Because the perl section is looking like that right now. I believe that Stack Overflow is going out of it's charter in becoming a newbie FAQ when as far as the original reasoning it was meant to be something along the lines of an expert site.   is a good example of what I mean in Perl. It probably could be closed because it's a duplicate, or some other reason.   I would also like to indicate that I don't hold back answering newbie questions. It's just when I think of an obscure "stack overflow" error that's beating you some 3 am close to deadline, that's not "Howcum Perl print ..." and follows with something that causes a vast majority of Perl programmers to say oops, because they know exactly what's going on.   So the proposal is   A new site. "Move to Newbieville" A new "section" A new status somewhat similar to Closed ("Newbied") but still can be updated all the same as an open question.   I'm not against giving some newbies an assist, but I feel a FAQ for rank newbieism is not something that SO started out to be, based on the original concept of a Expert Site.   Including comment to Gnoupi:   I said nothing about making newbies unwelcome. Like I said. I answer them--heck, I think I've even answer homework questions. I've answered on the vague impressions that I can glean from posts that have 4 close votes. It can even lead to avoiding downvoting or yelling at newbies by more established curmudgeons if there is a special action you can do to gently inform newbies that this is a real newbie question.  However, you have to know that to some people newbies are already unwelcome. There is a site ethic, but the individual is also going to decide how much they welcome newbies. And people do post RTFM answers already.   Anyway, I'm one vote away from a peer pressure badge it seems. (Nope, nailed it.)    EDIT  For somebody jumping to the conclusion that I'm hostile to newbies:  just earlier Browsing Questions shows the same questions on different pages I have just been looking through the questions to answer those that I can and as I go to the next page (using the Next button at the bottom) I am presented with the same questions.  I imagine this is not a flaw and in fact questions are coming in fast filling up a page pushing my current page to the next one.  An idea to solve would be to set a variable for starting id when I start paging and only clicking an update button will reset the starting id. How can I add the session name to my screen status display? This is my current .screenrc files which is mostly copied from the link in the code  #First iteration 2014-09-06, not quite sure of stuff to add # got a fancy hardstatus line noted below hardstatus on hardstatus alwayslastline # hardstatus string "%w"  # blagged this hardstatus like from https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=55618, not quite sure what it does hardstatus string '%{= kG}%{C}Screen: %{c}%{= kG}[%= %{= kw}%?%-Lw%?%{r}(%{W}%n*%f%t%?(%u)%?%{r})%{w}%?%+Lw%?%?%= %{g}][%{C} %d-%m %{W}%c %{g}]'   I now want the session name to appear in it as well, and the one I have settled on is from this answer -   The solution runs along these line:  hardstatus string '%H:%`' backtick 0 30 30 sh -c 'screen -ls | grep --color=no -o "$PPID[^[:space:]]*"'   It is an area I am not familiar with and I wonder how the backtick command fits in it, ie whether it is a screen command at all. Which is the right way to do something like 'description' list but with customizable and fixed-width labels? I.e. something like this:  Label:         Text text text text text text                text text text text. Longer label:  Text text text text text text                Text text text text.   The way I see it to use two-column table (first columt for labels and second column for descriptions), but this solution seems ugly. Is there any other way? Can this intuition give a proof that an isometry $f:X \to X$ is surjective for compact metric space $X$? A prelim problem asked to prove that if $X$ is a compact metric space, and $f:X \to X$ is an isometry (distance-preserving map) then $f$ is surjective. The official proof given used sequences/convergent subsequences and didn't appeal to my intuition. When I saw the problem, my immediate instinct was that an isometry should be "volume-preserving" as well, so the volume of $f(X)$ should be equal to the volume of $X$, which should mean surjectivity if $X$ is compact. The notion of "volume" I came up with was the minimum number of $\epsilon$-balls needed to cover $X$ for given $\epsilon &gt; 0$. If $f$ were not surjective, then because $f$ is continuous this means there must be a point $y \in X$ and $\delta &gt; 0$ so that the ball $B_\delta(y)$ is disjoint from $f(X)$. I wanted to choose $\epsilon$ in terms of $\delta$ and use the fact that an isometry carries $\epsilon$-balls to $\epsilon$-balls, and show that given a minimum-size cover of $X$ with $\epsilon$ balls, that a cover of $X$ with $\epsilon$-balls could be found with one fewer ball if $f(X) \cap B_\delta(y) = \emptyset$, giving a contradiction. Can someone see a way to make this intuition work? Unable to open any graphical app with "sudo" Tried to find some answer here: , but it didn't solve my problem.  $ sudo gedit Failed to connect to Mir: Failed to connect to server socket: No such file or directory. Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused.  (gedit:4574): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:   only gedit in terminal works fine. This is my local computer, not a remote system. Does the 2020 Apple M1 MacBook Pro support 2x daisy chained Thunderbolt Displays? The Apple Silicon based  supports Thunderbolt version 3 and I'm wondering if anyone has tried connection one to an ? Of course you'd need to use one of Apple's Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 converters. I also understand that this version is limited to supporting only a single 4K or 6K display, but since the original Apple Thunderbolt Display is only 2K I’d want to try and daisy chain these. Can I run more than one external display from the Apple Silicon M1 CPU/GPU based MacBook Pro (or Air)? I am trying to figure out this:  c = 1 def f(n):     print c + n  def g(n):     c = c + n  f(1) # =&gt; 2 g(1) # =&gt; UnboundLocalError: local variable 'c' referenced before assignment   Thanks! "Answerer" and "asker" I am wondering if there is an easy way to inset mesh that is generated from text/curves? When I convert text to mesh it generates a bunch of uneven triangles that don't inset properly. My only solution is slow and tedious and requires manually removing all but the outline edges and refilling with quads. More specifically I am trying to create an engraving of text into a mesh, and rather than a straight bool cut I need the engraved text to inset a bit. The result needs to mesh (not through a shader). Any ideas appreciated. Why are bash tests so picky about whitespace? As a primarily Java programmer, I find the bash if-then construct quite confusing, especially regarding whitespace. Can anyone explain why the first one works, but not the second or third?  #works if [ -n $1 ]; then echo "parameterized"; fi  #output: ./links: Zeile 1: [-n: Kommando nicht gefunden. if [-n $1 ]; then echo "parameterized"; fi  #output: ./links: Zeile 1: [: Fehlende `]' if [ -n $1]; then echo "parameterized"; fi Dell Latitude E7270 I can ask any of:     Do you know a breakfast place nearby?   Do you know a nearby breakfast place?   Do you know a good breakfast place?   but I really can't ask:     Do you know a breakfast place good?   Is there a general rule for determining whether an adjective must come before the noun or may come, Spanish-style, after it? As a native speaker of English, the gerund version of this sentence sounds better:  infinitive:     When used together in chains,   extension methods are an unprecedented   tool to produce extremely concise   code.   gerund:     When used together in chains,   extension methods are an unprecedented   tool for producing extremely concise   code.   But how can I explain to someone learning English how to decide in situations like these whether to use the infinitive or the gerund? Can I charge a computer through its USB port? I've read a number of the helpful Q&amp;As on photons that mention the mass/mass-less issue. Do I understand correctly that the idea of mass-less (a rest mass of 0) may be just a convention to make the equations work?  From a layperson's view, it's difficult to understand how a particle of light (photon) can be mass-less. A physical object (everyday world-large or quantum-small) must have a mass. Yet, if my understanding is correct, the mass of a moving object/particle increases in proportion to its speed/velocity...so that at the speed of light, its mass would be infinite. A photon travels at the speed of light, but it obviously doesn't have infinite mass, right? Can someone formulate a practical explanation that can be understood by middle-school to high school kids? Much thanks for the help.    Wow--your answers to my original Q below clear up much of my confusion. I now have the daunting task of going over these nuggets and working up an equation-less (hopefully) explanation of the mass-less photon for non-physicist types.  Yes, from a layperson's view, it does seem remarkable that an existing piece of matter-- which has to be made of physical substance--could have zero mass at rest (though a photon is never at rest). It would be almost understandable if a piece of matter made of nothing had zero mass, but that  seems to be an oxymoron, and "nothing" would equate to nonexistent, right?  In case you might find it interesting: I'm working on a writing project that posits we inhabit a universe that consists of matter (physical stuff) only, and that the NON-physical (aka supernatural) does not (and cannot) exist. For instance, if a purported supernatural phenomenon is found to actually exist, then by definition, its existence is proof that it is mundane/natural. All it would take to disprove this premise is reliable proof that ONE supernatural event has occurred. Despite thousands of such claims, that's never yet happened.  Who else better than physicists to confirm my premise? However, I do wish the TV physicists would explain the terms they throw about, some of which mislead/confuse their lay viewers. Case in point: "The universe is made up of matter and energy" (without properly defining the term "energy" as a property of matter).  The result is that laypersons are left with the impression that energy must therefore be something apart from or independent of matter (ie, nonphysical). Their use of the term "pure energy" without specifying exactly what that means adds to the confusion. (Thanks to your replies on this forum, I now understand that "pure energy" refers to photon particles.) However, "psychics" and other charlatans take advantage of such confusion by hijacking terms like energy (as in "psychic energy"), frequencies, vibrations, etc to give perceived scientific legitimacy to their claims that a supernatural spirit world, etc., exists. As you may realize, the majority of people in the US (per 2009 Harris Poll) and around the world believe in the existence of nonphysical/supernatural stuff such as ghosts and spirits.  My purpose is to give laypersons the information they need to distinguish what's real from what's not.  Thanks so much for help...And, PLEASE, add any further comments you think might be helpful/insightful to better inform laypersons.