Checking from method for what method called it
How do I find the caller of a method using stacktrace or reflection?
Java method dispatch with null argument What's the best practice of inserting a collection of data into a SQL Server database Various \textcolor within lstlisting? Drift velocity of electron The Canon L lenses are much more expensive and presumably much better quality than non-L lenses. What makes an "L" lens? How much better are they over a similar length/speed "ordinary" canon lenses? How do I change skins in minecraft pe? How to see an embedded image's dpi (ppi) in a pdf in Acrobat Pro? The following situation baffled me slightly: after preparing a pdf in a different program I wanted to make sure that an embeded image in the pdf file had the right dpi, yet I found no way in adobe acrobat pro to inspect the file/image dpi.   Can that be, or am I missing where this feature is hidden? How do I boot into recovery mode? StringTokenizer? Convert the String to a char[] and iterate over that? Something else? Is there a general relation between $a/b$ and $(a+c)/(b+c)$ where $a,b&gt; 0$ and $c\geq 0$ ?   Is there a general proof for that relation ? How can I select part of a mesh and make it seperate? I want to make the teeth a separate child object from the mouth. I want to know the best way to do this.   I have tried going into edit mode with Tab and trying to select all the vertices but that doesn't move the teeth. Is there an easy way to select just that part and make it a separate child mesh to the rest of the mouth? Mavericks input source is set to US keyboard in login screen I'm from Belgium, and on my own user account, the input source is set to a Belgian (actually French) keyboard. The input sources menu is enabled in the menu bar, so I can switch it to the Belgian keyboard before entering my password, but how can I permanently change the input source used for login? I'm the system admin, and I know how to get root access if necessary.  It worked perfectly in Mountain Lion. What does a Terminator do after its mission is accomplished? A Terminator is essentially given a mission or an objective ("Go back in time and kill Sarah Connor" or something of the like).  What does a Terminator do once its mission is accomplished?  We see in Terminator 2: Judgment Day (the live-action movie) that the  (played by Arnold Terminator Schwarzenegger) completed its mission of protecting the Connors, and then sort-of just melted itself into nothingness (presumably to protect the world from discovering Terminators again).  But what would the  or the  (in Terminator 3) have done?   Are they given multiple directives ("Go kill Sarah Connor, then go kill Robert Baratheon, and then have a nice hot bath; you've earned it")?  This question is related, but not a dupe: overbrace/underbrace but with an arrow instead Is there a similar command to \overbrace{foo}^{bar} but instead of braces, an arrow pointing up/down?  EDIT: Here's a little demonstration of how I'd expect something like this to work:    And possible syntax would be \overarrow{a=b}^{\text{theorem X}} I'm currently working on the following question:  "At least one of Plato and Democritus believed in the theory of forms. Plato believed in the theory of forms only if he was not an atomist, and Democritus was an atomist only if he did not believe in the theory of forms. Democritus was an atomist. Prove, using Natural Deduction, that Plato was not an atomist"  I have been working for quite some time to take the information and turn it into a set of literals and statements I can work with.  So far, I have got $P \lor D$,  $P \Rightarrow \lnot a$,  $D \Rightarrow A$,  $D = A$  However, I cannot seem to make these prove the statement using natural deduction, any hints? Coupon Collector Problem with Batched Selections I am trying to solve a variation on the .  In this scenario, someone is selecting coupons at random with replacement from n different possible coupons. However, the person is not selecting coupons one at a time, but instead, in batches.  Here's an example problem formulation: There are 100 distinct coupons. A person makes selections in 10-coupon batches at random (each coupon with replacement). What is the expected number of batches necessary to have selected 80 unique coupons?  I have been able to determine the expected number of selections necessary to have selected k unique coupons when selecting one at a time (much like Henry's ), but I'm a bit stumped as to how to go about solving it with this particular wrinkle.  Any tips/guidance would be greatly appreciated. Should Indicate which Positions I've Already Applied For Conjugate subgroup strictly contained in the initial subgroup? Let $G$ be a group, $H\subseteq G$ a subgroup and $a\in G$ an element of the group. Is it possible that $aHa^{-1} \subset H$, but $aHa^{-1} \neq H$?   If $H$ has finite index or finite order, this is not possible. Show that $\tan{(\pi/7)} \tan{(2\pi/7)}\tan{(3\pi/7)}=\sqrt{7}$ Is the uncertainty principle a property of elementary particles or a result of our measurement tools? In many physics divulgation books I've read, this seems to be a commonly accepted point of view (I'm making this quote up, as I don't remember the exact words, but this should give you an idea):      is not a result of our lack of proper measurement tools. The fact that we can't precisely know both the position and momentum of an elementary particle is, indeed, a property of the particle itself. It is an intrinsic property of the Universe we live in.   Then this video came out:  (skip to , if you're already familiar with the uncertainty principle).  So, correct me if I'm wrong, what we may claim according to the video is:     the only way to measure an elementary particle is to make it interact with another elementary particle: it is therefore incorrect to say that an elementary particle doesn't have a well defined momentum/position before we make our measurement. We cannot access this data (momentum/position) without changing it, therefore it is correct to say that our ignorance about this data is not an intrinsic property of the Universe (but, rather, an important limit of how we can measure it).   Please tell me how can both of the highlighted paragraphs be true or how they should be corrected.