Install Windows 10 on a partition with ubuntu 16 already installed
How can I install Windows after I've installed Ubuntu?
Pre-1980s Sci-fi movie about killer aliens Which command should I use for displayed equations? A number of related questions have already been asked about this issue:       and even    But I'm still confused by the conflicting suggestions that have been given so far. So I'm trying again.  Which should be the preferred command to produce a displayed equation in my LaTeX documents?  So far the suggestions indicate that one should use \[ ... \], maybe \begin{equation*} ... \end{equation*}, or maybe even the gather* or align* environments from amsmath.  And one should definitely avoid using either $$...$$ or the eqnarray environment.  Now I have to say that, from a language perspective, I have a strong preference for the equation* environment because it is less cryptic than the \[ ... \] notation and it is  the most accurate.  So, is it fine to use equation*? Maybe only after loading amsmath? Or should the equation/equation* environment be redefined to something else so that spacing, package support, or whatever is improved? SVD: How to find the columnvector of U corresponding to a singular value equal to zero Example: I type man ls, than I want to get man only.   By using !! I can get man ls but how do I get man? Why does the Euclidean algorithm work for polynomials? What is the proof? Suppose I know that I can find the $\gcd$ of two integers with the Euclidean algorithm. What is the 'extension' so I can use this method also for polynomials?  Edit: I found an easy answer with less rigor which is approachable without knowledge of matrices:    also the first 3 subchapters of Why more (and varying number of) logical reads with read ahead (prefetch)? After creating tpch database in my SQL Server, I tried below query:      set statistics io on     DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS;             select top 100 * from dbo.lineitem order by l_partkey;   The table lineitem has a non-clustered index on l_partkey. I issued the above queries for several times and found out that the logical reads vary each time:      Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1019, physical reads 4, read-ahead reads 1760, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.     Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1007, physical reads 4, read-ahead reads 1720, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.     Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1030, physical reads 4, read-ahead reads 1792, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.   From the post here: , I know it could be caused by read ahead behavior.  BUT exactly why read ahead could cause more logical reads? How does it change the SQL Server behavior? Like SQL Server may read more index page since it's in cache anyway?  Anyway, I disabled read ahead and issue the above query again. Now it reports the same amount of logical reads each time. BUT the logical reads is much smaller!!      Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 404, physical reads 160, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.   So my question is, why the read ahead feature could cause many more and various logical reads count?  Out of curiosity, I tried another query without the "order by":      select top 100 * from dbo.lineitem   Here's the result without read ahead:      Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 5, physical reads 3, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.   Here's the result with read ahead:      Table 'lineitem'. Scan count 1, logical reads 15, physical reads 2, read-ahead reads 3416, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.   The one with read ahead still has more logical reads. So, why? Creation of entangled electrons What algorithm for a tic-tac-toe game can I use to determine the "best move" for the AI? If $f(x)$ is differentiable at x, I need to prove that $\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x-h)}{2h}$ exist and is finite.  so if $f(x)$ is differentiable at a $x$, the difference quotient exist for this point, and also $f(x)$ must be continuous at x as well  so that mean that:  $\lim_{h\to0^+}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} =  \lim_{h\to0^-}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$  and that: $\lim_{x\to x_0^+}=\lim_{x\to x_0^-}=f(x_0)$  I know I should probably use arithmetic limit laws to prove this but I can't see how what I figured out could help me. any help with that?  Thanks! Once a post has been edited, you can go into the revision list, and click "View Source".  If a post has not been edited (and I don't have the edit privilege) is there any way to see the raw Markdown?  The reason I ask I because of  - it's impossible to see the source markdown, and how it's different from the rendered Markdown.  Not exactly a huge issue, just curious! How to calculate the division and remainder of a big number manually Let $x = 2017^{2017}$. How can I manually determine:   The remainder of the division of $x$ by $31$ The least significant digit of $x$ Supremum and Infimum Let $A$ be a nonempty set of real numbers which is bounded below. Let $-A$ be the set of all numbers $-x$, where $x \in A$. Prove that $\inf A = -\sup(-A)$.   We know that $-A$ is bounded above. Hence $\sup(-A)$ exists. So to proceed, one would show that $\inf A \leq -\sup(-A)$ and $\inf A \geq -\sup(-A)$? Or $-\inf A &gt; \sup(-A)$ and $-\inf A &lt; \sup(-A)$.  I get the sense that one can use the following fact as well: (i) Let $\alpha = \sup S$. If $\beta &lt; \alpha$ then $\beta$ is not an upper bound for $S$. I used source code to build one package such as below:  ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-package-name="Myplugin" --with-package-origin="http://www.ubuntu.org/" --enable-gtk-doc --disable-static make make install   But unfortunately, i discovered that its the latest version, and has lot of bugs, so i need to remove it/uninstall it. But how can i do so? I tried make clean; make uninstall but still i see it exist:  # pkg-config --list-all | grep Myplugin myplugin-.... $ ls /usr/lib/myplugin/libXYZ.so exist....   How do you remove this now? Attending graduate school at my undergraduate university I've been told by numerous people that (1) my undergraduate university will be disinclined to bring me on as a graduate student, and that (2) it's a bad idea to attend grad school where you completed your undergraduate degree, anyway.  Is that true? If so, why? I have a question that bothers me after reading a part of the big book of rules :).  It's about the rule 717, illegal actions.     717.1. If a player realizes that he or she can’t legally take an action after starting to do so, the entire action is reversed and any payments already made are canceled. No abilities trigger and no effects apply as a result of an undone action. If the action was casting a spell, the spell returns to the zone it came from. The player may also reverse any legal mana abilities activated while making the illegal play, unless mana from them or from any triggered mana abilities they triggered was spent on another mana ability that wasn’t reversed. Players may not reverse actions that moved cards to a library, moved cards from a library to any zone other than the stack, or caused a library to be shuffled.   For example, player A plays a .     As an additional cost to cast Goblin Grenade, sacrifice a Goblin.   Goblin Grenade deals 5 damage to target creature or player.   It goes on the stack. Player B gains priority and casts a  on the only goblin of Player A.     Destroy target nonartifact, nonblack creature. It can't be regenerated.   The terror goes on the stack. Then both players agree to resolve the stack. The terror kills the last goblin standing and then the Goblin Grenade can't be cast because of the additional cost which can't be paid. So in my opinion that leaves two possibilities:   The Goblin Grenade returns to the zone it was previously from (the hand of Player A) The Goblin Grenade becomes illegal and gets countered, so it goes to the graveyard   Based on rule 717 I think it goes back to the hand but I'm not quite sure. :) The polymorph spell states, in part:     The target’s game statistics, including mental ability scores, are   replaced by the statistics of the chosen beast. It retains its   alignment and personality.   Does retaining its personality suffice to let it remember who its allies are?  Even if transformed into something stupid like a T-rex?  What does it even mean for a beast with Int 2 to have someone's "personality"? Does potential energy in gravitationall field increase mass? Every finite commutative ring with no zero divisors contains a multiplicative identity? Get variable from PHP to JavaScript "Writ large", "Writ small", and others I have seen this used with other words besides "large" and "small".  What other words can be used? Can this structure be used more generally with other adjectives?