Load a custom .bst file into bibTeX
bst file not found
I have the following table:     \documentclass[a4paper,preprint,aps,                    unsortedaddress]{revtex4}     \usepackage[top=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm,                 left=3.5cm,right=2.5cm]{geometry}     \usepackage{longtable,array,booktabs}      \ifdefined\mc        \renewcommand{\mc}{\multicolumn}     \else        \newcommand{\mc}{\multicolumn}     \fi      \begin{document}           \setlength\LTleft{-3.0cm}         \setlength\LTright{-2.0cm}          \scriptsize      \begin{longtable}{ l r @{--} p{1.3cm} &gt;{\centering}p{2.6cm}                         *{4}{p{1.25cm}} p{2.1cm}}                    %% headers and footers      \caption{Table} \\      \hline\hline     \endfirsthead      \mc{9}{c}{\tablename\ \thetable\ -- \emph{Continued from previous page}} \\      \hline     aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa &amp; \mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} &amp; ddd &amp; eee &amp; fff &amp; ggg &amp; hhh &amp; iii \\     \hline     \endhead      \hline     \mc{9}{r}{\emph{Continued on next page}} \\     \endfoot      \hline\hline     \endlastfoot      %% body of table          aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa &amp; \mc{2}{c}{bbb--ccc} &amp; ddd &amp; eee &amp; fff &amp; ggg &amp; hhh &amp; iii \\     aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa &amp; bbb &amp; ccc &amp; ddd &amp; eee &amp; fff &amp; ggg &amp; hhh &amp; iii \\     aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa &amp; bbb &amp; ccc &amp; ddd &amp; eee &amp; fff &amp; ggg &amp; hhh &amp; iii \\     aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa &amp; bbb &amp; ccc &amp; ddd &amp; eee &amp; fff &amp; ggg &amp; hhh &amp; iii \\      \end{longtable}     \end{document}   which I would like to shift to the left by setting \setlength\LTleft{-3.0cm}  and \setlength\LTright{-2.0cm}. Furthermore, I have to apply \scriptsize for the table. However, none of these commands are working with revtex4. Could you please provide a solution to this problem? (This question is the same as in , but I cannot sign up with that username.)  If it is not possible, an alternative solution would also be useful for me. For this case, I attached the first page of my real table. Is linear algebra more “fully understood” than other maths disciplines? In , it was discussed how LA is a foundation to other branches of mathematics, be they pure or applied. One answer argued that linear problems are fully understood, and hence a natural target to reduce pretty much anything to.   Now, it's evident enough that such a linearisation, if possible, tends to make hard things easier. Find a Hilbert space hidden in your domain, obtain an orthonormal basis, and bam, any point/state can be described as a mere sequence of numbers, any mapping boils down to a matrix; we have some good theorems for existence of inverses / eigenvectors/exponential objects / etc..  So, LA sure is convenient.  OTOH, it seems unlikely that any nontrivial mathematical system could ever be said to be thoroughly understood. Can't we always find new questions within any such framework that haven't been answered yet? I'm not firm enough with G&ouml;del's incompleteness theorems to judge whether they are relevant here. The first incompleteness theorem says that discrete disciplines like number theory can't be both complete and consistent. Surely this is all the more true for e.g. topology.  Is LA for some reason exempt from such arguments, or does it for some other reason deserve to be called the best understood branch of mathematics? Please help me with a tabular problem What does "...from nonmagical attacks not made with silvered weapons" mean? I'm sure your first thought is, that's perfectly clear.  Unfortunately my group who aren't normally rules lawyers disagree.  Party encounters a  (MM p.211).  It has:     Damage Immunities: bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from nonmagical   attacks not made with silvered weapons.   My reading of that is if the weapon has to be magical and silvered to hurt it.  So a +1 silver dagger will hurt it, but a +1 regular dagger or a +0 silver dagger won't.  The group's interpretation was that all three of those weapons would hurt and only a +0 regular dagger would be ineffective.    I would also note my interpretation would mean something like blade barrier would also not harm it since you could argue they're magical blades but nothing indicates that they're silvered.    This also appears to be the same wording for some undead so I'm not looking for a lycanthrope specific interpretation but something general for every time that wording is used.    Thanks in advance. What does general relativity say about the relative velocities of objects that are far away from one another? What does general relativity say about the relative velocities of objects that are far away from one another? In particular:--  Can distant galaxies be moving away from us at speeds faster than $c$? Can cosmological redshifts be analyzed as Doppler shifts? Can I apply a Lorentz transformation in general relativity? What are the uses of Unicorns? What different uses does the unicorn have?  Other than the delicious taste of them coming off the grill.   At Wit's End #221 What do I call the ′ in mathematical formulae? As in x′ = x + t  "Ex (?) equals ex plus tee".  In Russian it is called "штрих" (shtrikch). Why is my Mac constantly trying to connect to another server? After logging on, I see this dialog box pop up. Whenever I dismiss it, it reappears 30 seconds later. (Stealing focus at the same time! Grrrr!)    "Slate" is my old iMac, which is sitting on the desk next to me, turned off. How can I stop my new Mac from constantly trying to connect to my old one? Both are running 10.7.1. Lately I've been seeing this cookie popup that blocks a lot of the screen.  When I try to do the &quot;manage cookies&quot; thing, all it shows me are several categories, with a green oval containing a black circle to the right of each.  Clicking on that oval makes it disappear.  Clicking on the same spot again makes it reappear.  But I see no indication as to which state is off or on. So how can I make this popup go away, never to bother me again?  Or failing that, could you at least provide some indication as to what those buttons do?  Like maybe simple text saying &quot;Off&quot; or &quot;On&quot;? Device not detected in Eclipse when connected with USB cable I have a project that needs a different voltage (or multiple voltages) than what I have available. Sometimes I need DC instead of AC, or I need a lower or higher voltage. How do I convert from one to another? Should I use resistors or a regulator or something else?  I've heard of converters, transformers, regulators, inverters, step-down, step-up, buck, boost, switching, linear, and other terms. Or acronyms (initialisms) like PMIC and LDO. Can someone shed some light on all this? My boot is horribly slow, and I don't know why.  $ systemd-analyze  Startup finished in 10.975s (kernel) + 49.732s (userspace) = 1min 708ms $ systemd-analyze blame           34.971s apt-daily.service          20.590s snapd.refresh.service          17.113s grub-common.service          16.033s apport.service          16.027s networking.service          15.894s ondemand.service          15.860s irqbalance.service          15.655s speech-dispatcher.service          11.695s ModemManager.service           9.772s accounts-daemon.service           8.626s NetworkManager-wait-online.service           8.058s systemd-logind.service           8.053s bluetooth.service           7.944s gpu-manager.service           7.896s alsa-restore.service           7.892s pppd-dns.service           7.882s rsyslog.service           7.860s avahi-daemon.service           7.844s dev-sda1.device           7.842s systemd-user-sessions.service           7.648s lightdm.service           7.610s teamviewerd.service           6.445s apparmor.service   Also, during boot-up, I see a message that says something like:  device descriptor read/all, error -62 ata1 softreset failed (device not ready) #most of the times error loading journal #(sometimes) Test WP failed, assume Write Enabled Asking for cache data failed     #most of the times Assuming drive cache: write through   apt-daily.service slows the boot the most. Any idea on how to tackle that?  I have Ubuntu MATE 16.04. Building a wormhole We regularly get questions about wormholes on this site. See for example  and . Various wormhole solutions are known, of which my favourite is  because it's closest to what every schoolboy (including myself many decades ago) thinks of as the archetypal wormhole.  The trouble is that Visser has pulled the same trick as  of starting with the required (local) geometry and working out what stress-energy tensor is required to create it. So Visser can tell us that if we arrange exotic string along the edges of a cube the spacetime geometry will locally look like a wormhole, but we know nothing about what two regions of spacetime are connected.  My question is this: suppose I construct a Visser wormhole by starting in Minkowksi spacetime with arbitrarily low densities of exotic matter and gradually assembling them into the edges of a cube, how would the spacetime curvature evolve as I did so?  I'm guessing that I would end up with something like Wheeler's bag of gold spacetime. So even though I would locally have something that looked like a wormhole it wouldn't lead anywhere interesting - just to the inside of the bag. I'm also guessing that my question has no answer because it's too hard to do any remotely rigorous calculation. Still, if anyone does know of such calculations or can point me to references I would be most interested. I am looking for a word that would describe someone who always goes out of their way to take their time and do a good job. Sort of the opposite of half-assing something.  I am looking for something that is more about a work ethic than a technically proper way of doing things. Something like canonical or protocol would not be a good fit. Title used for an autokrat in an Asimov story? Parsing DateTime on Localized Systems Formerly List of all badges with full descriptions.  What are badge name's requirements? Why didn't I get badge name ? Which badges can I earn multiple times?    Jump to:                    Note: Some badges are awarded based on score. The term score means the total number of upvotes minus the total number of downvotes.  Any badge with a *** next to it is one of 20 badges that count towards the  displayed on a moderator candidate in an election. The candidate score is a total of 40 points: the first 20 are awarded based on the user's rep divided by 1000 and rounded down; the second 20 represents the total number of unique badges earned of the 20 that count. Note that if the same badge is earned multiple times, it will only count once towards the candidate score.  Any badge with a &quot;(retired)&quot; next to it is no longer awarded, but is retained by users who previously earned them. See  for more info on what it means for a badge to be retired.       Visit the  of the  on any site to see a complete list of badges that you can filter by earned, unearned, or type. comma delineation of consecutive endnotes Consecutive footnotes can be separated by commas by invocation of the multiple option of the  package:    \documentclass{article} \usepackage[multiple]{footmisc} \begin{document} Comma delineation of consecutive footnotes fails upon conversion to endnotes% \footnote{First note.}% \footnote{Second note.}.% \end{document}   This comma delineation fails, however, if footnotes are converted to endnotes using the  package:    \documentclass{article} \usepackage{endnotes} \let\footnote=\endnote \usepackage[multiple]{footmisc} \begin{document} Comma delineation of consecutive footnotes fails upon conversion to endnotes% \footnote{First note.}% \footnote{Second note.}.% \theendnotes \end{document}   How can one preserve automated comma delineation of consecutive endnotes? Why is the derivative of a circle's area its perimeter (and similarly for spheres)? When differentiated with respect to $r$, the derivative of $\pi r^2$ is $2 \pi r$, which is the circumference of a circle.  Similarly, when the formula for a sphere's volume $\frac{4}{3} \pi r^3$ is differentiated with respect to $r$, we get $4 \pi r^2$.  Is this just a coincidence, or is there some deep explanation for why we should expect this? If you select "USB" and "Mac" on , it gives a series of command line instructions to make a USB key which the MacBook will boot into Ubuntu from.  I've followed them to the letter two or three times on different USB keys, and it doesn't work. There's a very great deal of technical discussion about EFI etc. but this set of instructions seems to suggest it should just work, but it doesn't.  Help? I'm increasingly unhappy with the more locked-down approach Apple is taking, and I'd quite like to start using Linux with a view to transitioning over to using it as my main operating system, but booting from the CD takes forever, runs slowly and I'm really hoping to get it moving off USB.  Can anybody help me?