Downloading from kickass
How can I make Firefox open magnet-links in Transmission?
How do you read CSS rule values with JavaScript? How does "this" keyword work within a function? I just came across an interesting situation in JavaScript.  I have a class with a method that defines several objects using object-literal notation.  Inside those objects, the this pointer is being used.  From the behavior of the program, I have deduced that the this pointer is referring to the class on which the method was invoked, and not the object being created by the literal.    This seems arbitrary, though it is the way I would expect it to work.  Is this defined behavior?  Is it cross-browser safe?  Is there any reasoning underlying why it is the way it is beyond "the spec says so" (for instance, is it a consequence of some broader design decision/philosophy)?  Pared-down code example:  // inside class definition, itself an object literal, we have this function: onRender: function() {      this.menuItems = this.menuItems.concat([         {             text: 'Group by Module',             rptletdiv: this         },         {             text: 'Group by Status',             rptletdiv: this         }]);     // etc } system of ode with non-constant coefficient matrix Do you get to use the additional attack from the Extra Attack feature as well when you Ready an Attack action?  One of my players, a monk, decided to Ready an action as an earth elemental was about to attack. The trigger was the elemental moving within five feet of him. When this occurred, he took his Attack action, and then proceeded to take the extra attack as well.  I was unsure at the time whether or not the extra attack would also happen, and I haven't had much luck figuring it out. I am having a lot of trouble with these series questions. Up until this point, I had relatively little trouble with all the questions in the book. These seem to require knowledge about approximations of functions and other external experience-based knowledge, which I just don't have yet.  Determine convergence or divergence of the given series. In the case of convergence, determine whether the series converges absolutely or conditionally.  $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^n\left[e-\left(1+\frac 1 n \right)^n\right]$$  It's easy to see that  $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\left[e-\left(1+\frac 1 n\right)^n\right]=0$$  however, in order to apply Leibniz's Rule and show conditional convergence I need to show that the sequence is monotonically decreasing. This doesn't seem doable with straight inequalities, so I tried taking the derivative, which just resulted in an uninterpretable mess. This doesn't even begin to address the question of absolute convergence/divergence.  There are 54 of these questions... I must be missing something really fundamental if they all take this long. Need to prove that $(S,\cdot)$ defined by the binary operation $a\cdot b = a+b+ab$ is an abelian group on $S = \Bbb R \setminus \{-1\}$. So basically this proof centers around proving that (S,*) is a group, as it's quite easy to see that it's abelian as both addition and multiplication are commutative. My issue is finding an identity element, other than 0. Because if 0 is the identity element, then this group won't have inverses.  The set explicitly excludes -1, which I found to be its identity element, which makes going about proving that this is a group mighty difficult. Does an unpublished document you upload to ResearchGate count as prior publication when submitting to a journal? On ResearchGate, if you upload something like a thesis, and then it says publish resources, does this mean the thesis becomes properly published in the sense of the usual requirements of journals that there be no prior publication of the submitted work?   I ask because I’m drafting thesis chapters into journal articles and did not choose to publish the thesis as a whole work in order to do so, so I want to make sure that by clicking publish resources I am not actually publishing the copy I’ve uploaded, I’m just making it publicly available? Does this mean it becomes published despite it not technically being a published work? (If so, I’ll just remove the copy I uploaded). Why is every Noetherian zero-dimensional scheme finite discrete? OEM license activation for Windows 10 Home VirtualBox guest, on Ubuntu host Context Three years ago my company got me a Lenovo T550 with Windows 10 Home installed on it (my understanding is that this is called &quot;OEM&quot;). I immediately erased everything to install Ubuntu on it. Unfortunately from now on I will need to use Windows 10 a few times a week for legacy reasons, but my main work is still on Ubuntu, so I am thinking of running Windows 10 within VirtualBox within Ubuntu. Lenovo recommendation Lenovo told me that my Windows Home license is somehow linked to my hardware (firmware?) and that Windows will automatically find this out. They pointed me to :  The installation of Microsoft Windows Server 2008,2008 R2 SP1, 2012, and 2012 R2 from Lenovo OEM media to such a virtual machine will fail until the virtual BIOS has been updated to include this information. setVMBIOS.exe performs this function for servers using Microsoft Hyper-V technology. Consult your hypervisor vendor for information on how to perform this function on other hypervisors. [...] The fix resolves this issue by adding Lenovo information to the virtual BIOS.  Note: That page does not mention Windows 10 Home, but I guess the same applies? VirtualBox How to apply Lenovo's recommendation to VirtualBox? (5.2.18) Right now I have out-of-the-box VirtualBox and the VM I created yesterday with standard settings does not activate:   Windows is not activated. Windows reported that no product key was found on your device. Error code: 0xC004F213 Intuitive explanation of the bias-variance tradeoff? I am looking for an intuitive explanation of the bias-variance tradeoff, both in general and specifically in the context of linear regression. Setting DIV width and height in JavaScript When is the sum of divisors a perfect square? I have added a custom/secondary query to a template file/custom page template; how can I make WordPress use my custom query for pagination, instead of using the main query loop's pagination?  Addendum  I have modified the main loop query via . Why isn't pagination working, and how do I fix it? Imagine a black hole that is fast-approaching its final exponential throws of Hawking evaporation. Presumably, at all points in this end process there will remain a region that identifiably remains &quot;the black hole&quot; until the the very end, as opposed to huge swarm of fundamental particles that is being radiated out from it. As the mass of the black hole descends to that of individual particles, it would seem entirely feasible that the very last fermionic Hawking radiation event available to the almost-deceased black hole could leave it with an unbalanced charge, e.g. -1, and an unbalanced spin, say 1/2. It would also have some kind of mass of course, but that aspect of the final residue could be fine-tuned to any specific value by photon emissions of arbitrary frequencies. After photon emission mass trimming, the resulting black hole residuum would reach a point where it is no longer be able to evaporate into any known particle, because there is no longer any lower-mass option available to it for removing the -1 charge and 1/2 spin. The black hole residuum will at that point be stuck, so to speak, stuck with exact charge, spin, and mass features of an electron. And so my question: Is it an electron? And if so, by equivalence, is every electrons in the universe really just a particular type of black hole that cannot evaporate any further due to the constraints of charge and spin conservation? And if so, why are charge and spin so uniquely combined in such black hole remnants, so that e.g. a remnant of -1 charge and zero spin is not permitted, at least not commonly, and the mass is forced to a very specific associated level? Is there anything in the current understanding of general relativity that would explain such a curious set of restrictions on evaporation? The full generalization of this idea would of course be that all forms of black hole evaporation are ultimately constrained in ways that correspond exactly to the Standard Model, with free fundamental particles like electrons being the only stable end states of the evaporation process. The proton would be a fascinating example of an evaporation that remains incomplete in a more profound way, with the three quarks remaining incapable of isolated existence within spacetime. The strong force, from that perspective, would in some odd sense have to be a curious unbalanced remnant of those same deeper constraints on the overall gravitational evaporation process. This may all be tautological, too! That is, since Hawking radiation is guided by the particles possible, the constraints I just mentioned may be built-in and thus entirely trivial in nature. However, something deeper in the way they work together would seem... plausible, at least? If an electron is an unbalanced black hole, then the particles given off would also be black holes, and the overall process would be not one of just particle emission, but of how black holes split at low masses. Splitting with constraints imposed by the structure of spacetime itself would be a rather different way of looking at black hole evaporation, I suspect. (final note: This is just a passing thought that I've mulled over now and then through the years. Asking it was inspired by  by Ben Crowell. I should add that I doubt very seriously that that my wild speculations above have anything to do with Wheeler's concept of geons, though.) How do you use a variable in a regular expression? Do I need to enable the publishing features to change a Team Site's master page? When building a SharePoint 2010 site, we have a root Publishing site that has been branded up using a custom Master Page.  We'd now like to add some Team Sites below the publishing site, and have our branding and other look and feel changes applied there too, and for that we need to change the "System Master" setting of the Team Site.  The "Master page" options in the site settings are only available if I've enabled the Publishing features in the team site, but I'd rather not do this if I can avoid it.  Ideally, this should be enabled as soon as a new team site is created, without the site owner having to change the site settings. What to do to switch to biblatex? Because of the great answers posted around in the site, I'm finally considering to do the switch and move to biblatex. So, the question is what do I have to do?  To give the question some focus, assume that I already have a somewhat largish .bib file and a bunch of documents using natbib for my references. What do I have to change in my existing .bib and .tex files?  And what about coauthors? Would it be reasonably simple to instruct them how to work with the new documents using biblatex? Do they have to install new software/packages as well? Problem: Evaluate $$ L=\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=1}^{n} \left(  \left\lfloor \frac{2n}{k} \right\rfloor -2\left\lfloor \frac{n}{k}\right \rfloor \right).$$  Please help me with this one.  I tried using the sandwich theorem by first constructing the following  $$ 2 \geq \left\lfloor \frac{2n}{k} \right\rfloor -2\left\lfloor \frac{n}{k} \right\rfloor \geq -1 $$ and then summing over. But the limit of the two bounds are different so sandwich theorem doesn't help!. Is it possible to construct sharper bounds?  Also I observed that if we ignore question of continuity, etc. then we can write,  $L= \displaystyle \int ^{1}_{0}\left\lfloor \frac{2}{x} \right\rfloor -2\left\lfloor \frac{1}{x} \right\rfloor dx$  Now I am able to compute the above integral. But is the above process correct? If then how can make it rigorous? Or if any other approach is possible, please tell. My machine can't play encrypted DVDs on a fresh install.  How do I add this capability?  Another useful bit of information would be what programs are best for playing DVDs, once I'm able to do so.  See the .  Will I be able to play DVD movies from ? I came across a user with a notification that states:     This account is temporarily suspended network-wide. The suspension period ends on Dec 2 '18 at 2:35.   Screencap for posterity:    Unless this user is  (in which case the full year should be shown, or at least a tooltip), it seems like they should have been unbanned 4 months ago.