Trouble with template constructor of non-template class
Why can templates only be implemented in the header file?
Downloading all my questions with the answerer names I am writing several papers in which I use answers which I received in various StackExchange websites. Naturally I would like to acknowlege and thank the SE members that gave the useful answers. But there are many such answers, and each answer is relevant to a different paper.   So, I would like to download all the questions that I asked in the various SE websites, including the answerer names, to an Excel worksheet in which I can organize the questions by subject.  Is this possible? Install MySQLdb (for python) as non-compressed egg Windows installer for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS onwards Mid 2012 MBP shuts down claiming no power with charge at 30% or 40% or more Any way to have CPU temperature in the menu bar? I tried  and  but it does not update the temperature and I do not wish to change the fan speed. Wordpress speed slow after .5 million single image post via wp-cli How can I install Celestia on Ubuntu 18.04.1? INI file parsing in PowerShell What is a general rule for use of auxiliary verbs in sentence? Should we duplicate it or not? For instance,     It is available for every item and (is) used with . . . Durrett Example 1.9 - Pairwise independence does not imply mutual independence? Suppose there is a message that is encrypted with AES-128-CBC.  The message is as follows, new lines are used to delimit the 16 byte boundary for each block:  Wire funds from: Alice to Bob in   the amount of $ 1   Because this message is encrypted using CBC mode,  any modification of the first block of cipher text would propagate throughout the message.   However, the amount of the fund transfer falls in the last block.  I am under the assumption that an attacker can use the property of  to alter the last block and produce a valid amount that is greater than \$1 in far fewer than $2^{128}$ operations.   Is this a correct assumption?  Is there a name for this attack or do you know of a real world example?    My instinct is that if you just need one byte of the 16 byte block to be of a specific value then it would only require $2^8$ operations because the other 120 bits of the plain text could be any value. For example lets say we wanted the last block of cipher text to decrypt to 9\0 (where \0 denotes a single null byte, and the message would be interpreted as \$9), then it would take only $2^{16}$ operations to find this cipher text block.  Is there something I am missing? Is it true that the light from some galaxies will never reach us?   The explanation for that is that the Universe expanding faster than the speed of light. But, if the speed of light is constant in all reference frames, then in the reference frame of a galaxy, light must move at the speed of light and thus it must reach us (?).   Could you also explain  how is it possible that the Universe is expanding faster than the speed of light if an object can never be observed to move faster than light? (without Doppler effects). Norm of adjoint operator in Hilbert space Unable to cover get set in apex test class Auto comment "possible duplicate of ..." missing on voting to close as duplicate Please refer to the following question:    The  had posted an  a while back.  I posted a comment referring to the same and voted to close the question as a duplicate of the referenced question.  Surprisingly, an auto comment saying "possible duplicate of ..." was not generated.  I agree that the referenced question shows up in the linked questions list but an auto comment ought to be generated.  Seems like a bug.    EDIT: I understand that the above behavior is by-design.  However, I'd say that the behavior in the following case should also be the same:  It's interesting to see that the auto comment would be generated if you were to add a comment linking to an answer and then voting to close the question as duplicate.  For example, observe the following question: Loading a properties file from Java package Co-Buyer Automobile As a co-buyer on an automobile, can the other party take full possession? Both parties names are listed as the Purchaser's. Only one purchaser signed the retail order for the motor vehicle, and if so, how can one become a no co-buyer? Proving $(A\le B)\vee (B\le A)$ for sets $A$ and $B$ If $S_n$ has cyclic subgroups of these orders or not? This question was asked in my quiz and I am having difficulties in solving it .  Question : For a positive integer $n$ , let $S_n$ denote permutation group on $n$ symbols. Choose correct statements from below. (a) For a positive integer $n$ and for every $m$ with $1\leq m \leq n , S_n $ has a cyclic subgroup of order $m$; (b) For every positive integer $n$ and for every $m$ with $n&lt;m &lt;n!$, $S_n$ has a cyclic subgroup of order $m$; (c) There exists positive integers $n$ and $m$ with $n&lt;m&lt;n!$ such that $S_n$ has a cyclic subgroup of order $m$; (d) For every positive integer $n$ and for every group $G$ of order $n$, $G$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of order $S_n$ .  Attempt: (a) is true as I can choose an element of length $m$ which will generate cyclic subgroup of order $m$. (b) Choose $n=4$ and $m=19$ to contradict (b). (c) I dont know if there can be found any such case and if yes how to do so . (d) I dont know about it . kindly tell. Answer:   A,C,D are true Same gravatar is displayed for different users in stackexchange.com filters Same gravatar is displayed for different users in the stackexchange.com , under the Top Network Askers in the right side bar.   The red circled image's source (&lt;img src=) are from   https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/?s=18&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=PG&amp;s=30                                ^   Seems the gravatar id is missing here in the image source.  For an example from the list, the user  gravatar id should be    https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/66c66c4d97a7bc3859a85253f003e1fb?s=18&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=PG&amp;s=30   but it is mapped with   https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/?s=18&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=PG&amp;s=30   which caused the display issue.