Broadcom BCM43142 802.11b/g/n [14e4:4365] (rev 01) Wireless Driver isn't working on Ubuntu 18.04
Installing Broadcom Wireless Drivers
Expressions - is there an easy and "visual" way to combine them into another expression? How do I use/change Animation Extrapolation? (Can't find F-Curves / Animation Modifiers in 2.8(1)) Splitting a semicolon-separated string to a dictionary, in Python Why do first order languages have at most countably many symbols? Every proof that I read seems to assume that $|L|\leq\aleph_0$. But then how do you model things like field over $\mathbb{R}$ without running out of variable symbols?  More importantly, how can I prove that $|L|\leq\aleph_0$? Passive aggressive people will sometimes veil insulting, critical, derogatory or generally aggressive comments with humor. The patina of humor makes the comment seem like a joke, not to be taken seriously, all in good fun, and it safeguards the aggressive person. If someone gets offended, they are being too serious, can't take a joke, and so they cannot voice their upset without seeming to be the one escalating the situation, when in fact it was the aggressor who did that.   This behavior seems to lie on a spectrum. On one side are comments which are simultaneously aggressive and genuinely funny (though of course both, especially the latter, are fairly subjective). On the other side would be lame attempts at the behavior, something like "you are fat!... just joking!" in which nothing in the tone or delivery signals a register of humor. In the middle of the spectrum, I imagine, are aggressive statements genuinely delivered as jokes. Their register signals that they are jokes, but they are aggressive rather than funny. They are aggressive comments masquerading as jokes.      A friend once called this "joking on the square", but I have never heard or seen this phrase. This type of comment is both pervasive and psychologically subtle and in my experience there is often an exact word describing such things. If not a word, is there an astute phrase which cuts to the heart of this? It's so annoying to drag it over and over again. How to change default position of a console? Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token with JSON.parse Current sensing nA to mA I need to sense the current of a target  through various periods of its on/sleep/off state and then need to send this data back to another interface MCU to read out the value. They will be both on the same board, powered by 5&nbsp;V USB.  However these are the requirements I have:   5&nbsp;V USB PSU Must be able to sense currents in the range of nA to mA with high    accuracy/precision. (I figure 1&nbsp;nA to 500&nbsp;mA) Only measure the current of the target MCU and not the interface. Must output maximum 3.3&nbsp;V interface MCU   I have looked at available options and current sense amplifiers by Texas Instruments can't sense nA due to higher bias currents. So therefore I feel I would need a precision amplifier.  However I am stuck on how to proceed with this because, I need to somehow have a automatic dynamic current range and I am fairly new to current sensing and am not really sure on all the specifics. How do I get back some deleted records? I mistakenly deleted around 2,000,000 records from a remote SQL Server 2008 table.  The server is not granting me access to the backup files on the server side.   Is there any way to get back these records? I have already had the same problem before. On that occasion, I found a program that could scan my entire hard drive for string pieces so I could recover it. Unfortunately I don't remember the name of the program. It had to access the hard drive data directly, normal searches won't get any data from the hard drive before formatting. What does it mean to "program to an interface"? is a typical example for , though it is said that long time no see has been accepted by the mainstream English speakers.  Recently, there is a  movement in the , and a few new Chinglish words have been invented to demonstrate the characteristics of the Mainland.  The most outstanding examples (in my opinion) are:   shitizen - a citizen without citizen rights freedamn - the freedom for shitizens (no freedom) democrazy - the democracy for shitizens (no democracy) smilence - the speeches under the freedamn of speech () z-turn - to make effort in vain ( (Pinyin))   Here are my questions. Has there ever been any neologism movement in the history of English? What are the criteria to adopt new words into English? Plotting several 2d functions in a 3d graph I am trying to reproduce a similar figure to the following one. My first guess was to use pgfplots but I didn't find any example that I could use as a starting point. At the moment I am unsure if pgfplots is actually the right package or I should rely on something else e.g. TikZ.   Since I don't really know where to start, I would appreciate any piece of code that points me in the right direction.    EDIT  Here is some dummy data for the plots.  plot1   plot2   plot3   plot4 0       0       0       0 3.466   2.058   0       0 4.262   2.976   0.001   0 3.822   3.168   0.006   0.008 2.953   2.936   0.019   0.063 2.065   2.492   0.046   0.265 1.332   1.977   0.092   0.734 0.797   1.478   0.164   1.508 0.443   1.045   0.268   2.44 0.228   0.698   0.412   3.219 0.107   0.438   0.598   3.524 0.046   0.256   0.831   3.219 0.017   0.138   1.109   2.44 0.006   0.067   1.429   1.508 0.002   0.029   1.78    0.734 0       0.01    2.141   0.265 0       0.003   2.479   0.063 0       0.001   2.736   0.008 0       0       2.808   0 0       0       2.465   0 0       0       0       0 Taylor's Remainder $x-\frac{x^2}{2}+\frac{x^3}{3(1+x)}<\log(1+x) <x-\frac{x^2}{2}+\frac{x^3}{3}$ Prove that   $\displaystyle x-\frac{x^2}{2}+\frac{x^3}{3(1+x)}&lt;\log(1+x) &lt;x-\frac{x^2}{2}+\frac{x^3}{3}$  My attempt: I can prove this by taking one side at a time and assuming $\displaystyle f(x) = \log (1+x)-x+\frac{x^2}{2}-\frac{x^3}{3}$   and then proving that it is a decreasing function and then the same for the other side.  But I am looking for a better solution using Lagrange's Mean Value Theorem or using Taylor's remainder. Sending the output from 'dd' to awk/sed/grep I'm trying to approximate the computer's write speed using dd:  dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null bs=1K count=10000   which gives the following output  10000+0 records in 10000+0 records out 10240000 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.746313 s, 13.7 MB/s   How can I get the '13.7 MB/s' into a bash variable? I've tried piping the output from dd to progs like awk, sed and grep to no avail.  Ultimately, I'm calling this via os.system(...) from within a python script. If anyone knows of a more direct way to get a similar result inside python I'd be interested in that also. I'm trying to predict how long a file copy will take, based on the file size.  Any help would be greatly appreciated. How would I connect to a proxy on Ubuntu Studio? So I am running Ubuntu Studio on my laptop and what do I do to connect to a proxy? I search for proxy and in network settings their is no PROXY tab. What are key words in the tabs to look for? I'm from the State of Kuwait and hold an Eritrean passport. I'm planning to visit UK in October but my visa will expire in November.    Is it OK to make a journey in the last month of my visa, provided that I make sure that I book my plane back before expiring date? Does an Evocation shield have a reactive utility to it? Is "bared fruit" grammatical? Am I the only one whos athletic career bared fruit?    Is this sentence correct grammatically? I've noticed the following happen a few times:   A user posts a question. The question is closed as a duplicate and the usual "Possible Duplicate" links are added at the top. The user promptly removes the duplicate links, even though the question is still closed as a duplicate. (excessive use of list items =P)   Now, I could understand this behavior if there was some dispute about whether or not the question was a duplicate, and the OP were to remove the links and post reasons why they disagree with the closing. However, I've noticed this happening without any attempt to defend the question (such as ).  In my opinion, no one should be allowed to remove the "Possible Duplicate" links as long as the question is still closed as a duplicate. The links should remain for the benefit of the community, so they can navigate to the duplicate questions and either post answers there or read them over and judge if the closing was actually fair. Once/if the question is reopened the links could be edited out if one so chooses.  I guess this is part discussion, part feature request:  Could the "Possible Duplicate" links remain un-editable for as long as the question is still closed?