Demonstration of $\int_{-a}^a \frac{f(x)}{1+e^x} \,dx= \int_0^a f(x) \,dx$
Showing that $\int\limits_{-a}^a \frac{f(x)}{1+e^{x}} \mathrm dx = \int\limits_0^a f(x) \mathrm dx$, when $f$ is even
how to create facebook event in an android app? When I take the pth root, the bottom of the p comes very close to the \sqrt symbol.  In the New Century Schoolbook font (which I am using), the p actually intersects the \sqrt symbol, which looks even more terrible.  Is there a clean way to fix this?  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{fouriernc} % use the New Century Schoolbook font \begin{document} When I write $a^{(1/p)}$ as $\sqrt[p]{a}$, the bottom of the $p$ touches the top of the root symbol, which looks ugly. Even when the root symbol is larger, such as with $\sqrt[p]{\frac{1}{n}}$, it still looks bad (since the tail of the p almost hits that line). \end{document} Direction of $d\mathbf{l}$ A solid sphere has charge $q$ and radius $R$. Find the potential at a point a distance $r$ from the center of the sphere where $r&gt;R$, using infinity as the reference point.  My attempt:  From Gauss' theorem we may deduce that $\displaystyle\mathbf{E}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r'^2}\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ where $r'$ is the distance of an arbitrary point from the center of the sphere provided $r'&gt;R$.  $V=-\int_\infty^\mathbf{r}\mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l}$  My question: What is $d\mathbf{l}$? Since we are traversing in the direction opposite to $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$, I think it should be $-dr'\hat{\mathbf{r}}$. But when I use it to find $V$, I get a sign error. Please help! I started thinking about the number of associative (binary) operations on a set with $n$ elements today.  Looking online I found  which indicates only $113$ of the possible $19,683$ operations on a three-element set satisfy association.  So, $50\%$ of binary operations on a two-element set satisfy association, and less than $0.6\%$ of all binary operations on a three element set satisfy association.  For an $n$-element set, where $n$ denotes a natural number, is the ratio $R_{n}=A_{n}/B_{n}$, of the number of associative binary operations $A_{n}$ to the number of all binary operations $B_{n}$, in general small?  I don't mean the following questions as equivalent, but since they seem more concretely answerable in principle, does   $$ \lim_{n \to +\infty} \frac{A_{n}}{B_{n}} = 0 ? $$       Also, is $F : n \to R_{n}$ a monotonically decreasing function?  Some Background of the Question: In his Linear Algebra Problem Book 1995 on p. 6 Paul Halmos writes "The commonly accepted attitudes toward the commutative law and the associative law are different.  Many real life operations fail to commute; the mathematical community has learned to live with that fact and even to enjoy it.  Violations of the associative law, on the other hand, are usually considered by specialists only."  For all I know, Halmos might only have written that to motivate the study of Linear Algebra and doesn't quite literally mean what he appears to say.  But, if he means what he appears to say, and if $F : n \to R_{n}$ is monotonically decreasing, or $R_{n}$ is generally small, I think there's something amiss with what Halmos says, since non-associative operations seem so common that one may as well enjoy them. How to list all nodes of nodetype A which has the current node referenced? So this is what I'm trying to do in Drupal 6:  Node type A is video, node type B is a person Nodetype A has a reference field where you can enter a reference to any Node from nodetype B  how can I create a block view which will be displayed on nodes from node type b, which will show all the nodes from node type A where the current node from node type B is referenced? How can one prove that numbers of the form $4x^2+1$ can only be divided by primes of the form $4y+1$ (e.g. there is no $x$ for which $7$ divides $4x^2+1$)?   On a quick lookup, the statement is given as the first comment in  and of course, manual testing concurs with this So, in my physics textbook it's written that the kinetic energy possessed by a body is equal to the amount of work done by an opposing force to stop the body, now that got me thinking that when a ball hits a wall, the wall which is the opposing force does no work  because there is no displacement, so to say isn't the kinetic energy possessed by the ball zero? How to show similar display of codes of different programming languages in LaTeX I am very new to LaTeX and I am writing my thesis. In a chapter, I want to show my codes, which are in Mathematica.   I use the listings package as follows:  \documentclass{article}   \usepackage{listings}   \begin{document}   \lstset{language=Mathematica}    \begin{lstlisting}   Do[i^j,{i,1,10},{j,1,10}]   \end{lstlisting}    \end{document}   However, the output is much different to what the code looks like in the Mathematica IDE (even if I use other languages in \lstset{language=&lt;name&gt;}):    I read some questions on the site but, in some of them, the font or color of the codes were not the same. Could you please help me to display something like the picture below in LaTeX?  If it is important, I am using the BiDi package. How does a wheelie work? So I've been trying to create a mathematical model for an electric motorcycle and began to wonder about the maximum possible torque that could be supplied to the rear driven wheel without having the bike begin to lift up on one wheel.  I found ways to calculate this value online; however, the basic concept as to how the bike actually lifts escapes me.    My problem started when I began to think about what axis the bike will rotate about when it is doing the wheelie.  My first intuition was that the frame and front wheel, together, rotate about the rear axle.  But when I drew a free body diagram of the frame/front wheel system just at liftoff (see below) I made note that the only forces acting about the rear axle, point O, is the force of weight.  This means that an increase in applied torque and subsequently, the applied force Fa, should not effect the rotation about the rear axle.  I know that the applied force on the back wheel is indeed correlated with the propensity for a bike to wheelie, so I considered that the axis of rotation I was choosing was wrong.  If we take the free body diagram above and sum the moments about the center of mass, we would find that an increased applied force would in fact cause the solid body to rotate.  The problem with this understanding is that during rotation, the center of mass of the drawn system should actually rises relative to the surface the bike is moving across.  If the bike were to be truly rotating about its center of mass, then the back wheel would begin to dip below the surface of the road like you might see in a glitchy video game.    So I suspect that the bike is in fact rotating about the back axle, but I don't understand why, please help!  edit: I added the external torque from the back wheel to the frame, which would allow the bike to rotate about the back axle  edit 2:  I suppose that the torque acting on the frame via the engine should not effect the rotation as the movement of a motorcycle can be perfectly replicated by applying a force at the back axle.  A third possible axis of rotation might be the lowest point of the back wheel. How well-known is the theology of Middle-earth, in Middle-earth? One thing that is notably absent in Middle-earth is any mention of temples, churches, priests or religious rites.  There are passing mentions of Men who would "worship" Sauron, but generally the world of Middle-earth seems much less religious than medieval Europe, or even classical antiquity.  One never hears about "the cult of Aule" or "the cult of Yavanna," although historically there were many "cults of Athena" or "cults of Poseidon."  Aragorn doesn't (to my memory) make an offering to Tulkas before battle, nor does he pray to Eru Ilúvatar for victory, and all the holidays and solemnities seem to commemorate historical figures, not religious ones.  This is especially strange in a world where there are still living witnesses, like Galadriel, to the actions of the Valar and other "divine" beings, and where there are still Maiar wandering around talking to people and putting on flashy firework shows.  Now, a lot of people talk about how Tolkien didn't want the Valar to be considered "gods," but at the same time he did use phrases like "the gods of old" numerous times.  Clearly, these beings would have qualified for worship in most cultures.  And even without the Valar being considered a true pantheon, there is still Eru, a closer analogue to the Christian God of Tolkien's beliefs, and we know the denizens of Middle-earth knew of him (Him?) because of the line "Eru, who in Arda is called Ilúvatar."  And yet, Ilúvatar seems not to be terribly important to anyone on a daily basis.  So my question is this: how familiar with the "theology" of Middle-earth were the citizens of Middle-earth?  Would the average merchant in Rohan know about the Valar and the Maiar and Iluvatar and the Music of the Ainur?  The average noble in Minas Tirith?  The younger Elves, like Legolas?  The Dwarf Lords?  Were the theological truths about the formation of the world, the Valar and the Maiar just so well known that they weren't worth commenting on, or had they been forgotten by most?  And if they had been forgotten, why wasn't the knowledge (whether through deliberate teachings or casual conversation) re-invigorated by witnesses like Gandalf or Galadriel? Why are there non-visible objects in my final render? Radiation– white vs black house, hot or cool? We need to prove that $$\dfrac{\sin\theta - \cos\theta + 1}{\sin\theta + \cos\theta - 1} = \frac 1{\sec\theta - \tan\theta}$$  I have tried and it gets confusing. Integrate : $\int \frac{x^2}{(x\cos x -\sin x)(x\sin x +\cos x)}dx$ $$\int \frac{x^2}{(x\cos x -\sin x)(x\sin x +\cos x)}\ dx$$   My approach :   Dividing the denominator by $\cos^2x$ we get $\dfrac{x^2\sec^2x }{(x -\tan x)(x\tan x +1)}$ then  $$\int \frac{x^2\sec^2x}{x^2\tan x -x\tan^2x+x-\tan x}\ dx=\int \frac{x^2(1+\tan^2x)}{x^2\tan x -x\tan^2x+x-\tan x}dx$$  But I am not getting any relation between numerator and denominator so that I will take any substitution and solve further please suggest whether it is correct and how to proceed in this. Thanks. In university last semester I was asked to prove that $\sin1$ (1 radian that is) is irrational,  and ended up simply using the Taylor Series Expansion. This method provides a very quick solution, but I am curious as to whether anyone has a method for proving this without making use of the Taylor Series Expansion. I feel as though doing so must be possible using some number theory, but am low on ideas as to an alternative approach to the question.  Note:  If anyone is interested in my solution using Taylor Series Expansion (although it is not the focus of my question), here it is :      From    $$ \sin x = x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} -  \dots$$   We see that    $$ \alpha = \sin 1 = 1 - \frac{1^3}{3!} + \frac{1^5}{5!} -  \dots $$   Given integers $a$ and $b$, if $\alpha = \frac{a}{b}$ then it follows that $b!\alpha \in \mathbb{Z}$, and $b!\alpha = C + D$ where $C \in \mathbb{Z}$ and we have :   $$ D = \begin{cases} \pm(\frac{1}{b+1} - \frac{1}{(b+1)(b+2)(b+3)} + \dots) \text{    if $b$ is even}\\ \pm(\frac{1}{(b+1)(b+2)} - \frac{1}{(b+1)\dots(b+4)} + \dots ) \text{ if $b$ is odd}\\ \end{cases} $$   In each case we can see that $0 &lt; D &lt; 1$, giving us a contradiction.    Thus, we have that $\sin 1 $ is irrational.    $$ \blacksquare $$ $C^1[a,b]$ is closed in $C[a,b]$ Jack probs with heaphones/earbuds So I already asked this question, but I couldn't respond to the answers. I can't hear out of the left ear of any headphones/earbuds because I have to push the jack towards the Earth to hear out of it. It seems you guys think the jack is the problem when I'm pretty sure it's the computer (my Acer laptop). I also forgot to mention the headphones (PX22 Turtle Beaches) work with both ears, but I have to plug in the usb extension cord in order for that to work (it's also the same cord that enables the mic on my headphones), plus I lost the cord. Thanks 4 hewps. Currently, once an edit by a user without full edit privilege is suggested, it can be either approved or rejected.  There is a known edge case that cause suggested edits to get auto rejected: (aka edit conflict)   User with full edit privilege click "edit" and start typing. Let's name this user Joe. Since the user from previous step did not yet send the edit, users without full edit privilege can still click the "edit" as well, oblivious to the fact someone else is editing the same post in those very seconds. Such user click "edit" too and start typing. Let's name this user Kenny. Kenny is faster than Joe: he send his edit first, creating new suggested edit. Joe is still typing. Joe finally done typing. He send his edit to its merry way oblivious to the consequences. As result of the full edit made by Joe, Kenny's suggested edit is kicked away and rejected. Boom.   This is all known and reported many times.  where the user got it hard with at least two auto rejections in short period of time. Some concrete examples: , , .  For edge case, it became pretty thick edge. This is not just minor hassle: enough rejections, and the user is banned from suggesting for a whole week: and remember we're talking here about good edits made by good users. The above used to count for the ban, but . Thanks Gilles for requesting such a change!   I know it was already suggested to lock edits and similar solutions, but I suggest whole different approach: instead of auto rejecting the suggested edit, dismiss it, i.e. cancel it like it never existed same way a bounty can be revoked by moderator.  In the edit suggestion page it will show "Dismissed" instead of Approved or Rejected maybe with a tooltip explaining what caused this. This will soften the blow from those edge cases, taking the edge out of them. :) Draw Lewis structures like a book I want to draw a Lewis structure as in the picture. I tried to do with chemfig but does not perform the separation of the points and a minus in the superscript. What is an example of "this" assignment in C#? Does anybody have useful example of this assignment inside a C# method? I have been asked for it once during job interview, and I am still interested in answer myself.