Deleted questions remain in the "Questions" listing
Deleted question showing up in 'newest questions' tab
A closed form of $\int_0^1\frac{\ln\ln\left({1}/{x}\right)}{x^2-x+1}\mathrm dx$ This integral has been bugging me since yesterday:     $$\int_0^1\frac{\ln\ln\left({1}/{x}\right)}{x^2-x+1}\mathrm dx$$   I've tried substitution $y={1}/{x}$ and $e^y={1}/{x}$, but those didn't help much. Wolfram Alpha gives me result: $-0.67172$. Could anyone here please help me to obtain the closed form of the integral preferably (if possible) with elementary ways (high school methods)? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Inexact measurement and wavefunction collapse There is a classic problem:  Suppose that $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ form an i.i.d. sample from a uniform distribution on the interval $(0,\theta)$, where $\theta&gt;0$ is unknown. I would like to find the MLE of $\theta$.  The pdf of each observation will have the form: $$ f(x\mid\theta) =  \begin{cases} 1/\theta\quad&amp;\text{for }\, 0\leq x\leq \theta\\ 0 &amp;\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} $$ The likelihood function therefore has the form: $$ L(\theta) = \begin{cases} 1/\theta^n \quad&amp;\text{for }\; 0\leq x_i \leq \theta\;\; \text{for all }i,\\ 0 &amp;\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} $$ The general solution is usually that the MLE of theta must be a value of $\theta$ for which $\theta \geq x_i$ and which maximizes $1/\theta^n$ among all such values.   The reasoning is that since $1/\theta^n$ is a decreasing function of $\theta$, the estimate will be the smallest possible value of $\theta$ such that $\theta\geq x_i$.  Therefore, the mle of $\theta$, $\hat{\theta}$, is $\max(X_1,\ldots,X_n)$.  Here, I do not understand why we cannot just differentiate the likelihood function with respect to theta and then set it equal to $0$?  Thanks! constraint in oracle Did Voldemort die or stay in limbo after the final battle? In Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, while Harry is in Kings Cross he sees something like a small child, which is the fragment of Voldemort's soul that was attached to him.     He recoiled. He had spotted the thing that was making the noise. It had   the form of a small, naked child, curled on the ground, its skin raw and rough, flayed-looking, and it lay shuddering under a seat where it had been left, unwanted, stuffed out of sight, struggling for breath.      He was afraid of it. Small and fragile and wounded though it was, he did not want to approach it. Nevertheless he drew slowly nearer, ready to jump back at any moment. Soon he stood near enough to touch it, yet he could not bring himself to do it. He felt like a coward. He ought to comfort it, but it repulsed him.      Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows   Once Harry returns to the world of the living, that part of Voldemort's soul stays in limbo. Is this what happens to all fragments of someone's soul if he has divided his soul by creating a Horcrux? Does that mean that Voldemort's soul however crippled will stay in limbo or when all parts of his soul die, so does he? A text says:     The surface tension of a liquid results from an imbalance of intermolecular attractive forces, the cohesive forces between molecules:   A molecule in the bulk liquid experiences cohesive forces with other molecules in all directions.   A molecule at the surface of a liquid experiences only net inward cohesive forces   If this is the case: Why is surface tension considered or experienced as a force parallel to the interface while it is so obvious that it must be perpendicular to it? Prove that any complex matrix can be expressed in term of Hermitian and anti-Hermitian matrices How can we prove that any complex matrix can be expressed in term of hermitian and anti-hermitian matrices of the following form $A = H_1 + iH_2$ Where, $H_1$ is hermitian and $H_2$ is an anti-hermitian matrix On , I have my favorite tags filter. I setup email notifications for it and now I'm thinking I overdid it on the frequency. Trying to change the settings, I clicked on the edit link in the email notifications box to the right, except nothing happens. There are no JavaScript errors and the HTML for the link is simply &lt;a class=&quot;edit&quot;&gt;edit&lt;/a&gt;. This seems like unfinished planned feature. Update: Using Chrome Version 29.0.1547.66 m Same on Firefox 23.0.1  Both edit links are not working. Further Update Events capture:  Update 2014-02-03: Here's what the subscription tab in the network profile looks like. Although the merits of stepwise model selection has been discussed previously, it is becoming unclear to me what exactly is "stepwise model selection" or "stepwise regression". I thought I understood it, but not so sure anymore.  My understanding is that these two terms are synonymous (at least in a regression context), and that they refer to the selection of the best set of predictor variables in an "optimal" or "best" model, given the data. (You can find the Wikipedia page , and another potentially useful overview .)    Based on several previous threads (for example here: ), it appears that stepwise model selection is considered a cardinal sin. And yet, it seems to be used all the time, including by what seem to be well respected statisticians. Or am I mixing up the terminology?  My main questions are:   By "stepwise model selection" or "stepwise regression", do we mean: A) doing sequential hypothesis testing such as likelihood ratio tests or looking at p-values? (There is a related post here: ) Is this what is meant by it and why it is bad? Or B) do we also consider selection based on AIC (or similar information criterion) to be equally bad? From the answer at , it appears that this too is criticized. On the other hand, Whittingham et al. (2006; )1 seems to suggest that variable selection based on information-theoretic (IT) approach is different from stepwise selection (and seems to be a valid approach)...?  And this is the source of all my confusion.  To follow up, if AIC based selection does fall under "stepwise" and is considered inappropriate, then here are additional questions: If this approach is wrong, why is it taught in textbooks, university courses, etc.? Is all that plain wrong? What are good alternatives for selecting which variables should remain in the model? I have come across recommendations to use cross-validation and training-test datasets, and LASSO.   I think everyone can agree that indiscriminately throwing all possible variables into a model and then doing stepwise selection is problematic. Of course, some sane judgement should guide what goes in initially. But what if we already start with a limited number of possible predictor variables based on some (say biological) knowledge, and all these predictors may well be explaining our response? Would this approach of model selection still be flawed? I also acknowledge that selection of the "best" model might not be appropriate if AIC values among different models are very similar (and multi-model inference may be applied in such cases). But is the underlying issue of using AIC-based stepwise selection still problematic?  If we are looking to see which variables seem to explain the response and in what way, why is  this approach wrong, since we know "all models are wrong, but some are useful"?   1. Whittingham, M.J., Stephens, P.A., Bradbury, R.B., &amp; Freckleton, R.P. (2006). Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, pp. 1182–1189. I am starting to learn some Regex, therefore I use this command repeatedly:  grep pattern /usr/share/dict/american-english    Only the part with pattern changes, so I have to write the long expression "/usr/share/dict/american-english" again and again.   Someone made the remark that it is possible to expand an argument of a command from the command history by typing cryptic character combinations instead of the full expression.  Could you tell me those cryptic character combinations ? Maximum sum sublist? Is liquid cooling necessary for high CPU performance over extended periods? I'm planning on building a system for high CPU and memory performance.  Graphics performance is not a major concern, as I do not plan to use it for gaming.  I noticed that liquid cooling seems to have become common since my last build, and I am wondering if it is needed in my case.  I do not plan to overclock any of the components.  The intended use for the system is primarily development and occasional compute-intensive tasks that will run on all cores continuously for several days to a week.  The system will not normally be in continuous usage like this, but it needs to be capable of occasional extended periods of continuous use at full capacity.  I have included the main components below.  CPU: i7-5960X  Memory: 64GB DDR4  Graphics card: Nvidia GeForce GT 730 2GB  Drive 1: 1TB SSD  Drive 2: 4TB 7200RPM HDD  Power supply: 700W  Is liquid cooling needed for the above build?  If not, is there any advantage in using it?  I have read reviews that mentioned liquid cooling unit failures that resulted in leaks, so I would rather not use it if it is not necessary.  Thanks! In the decimal system: $...-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3...$ In the binary system: $...-11, -10, -1, 0, 1, 10, 11...$ In the unary system: $-111, -11, -1, \text{ ??? }, 1, 11, 111...$   I was only able to find a related question but none with an answer so far: What posts should be escalated to staff using [status-review], and how do I escalate them? How do I convince someone that $1+1=2$ may not necessarily be true? Me and my friend were arguing over this &quot;fact&quot; that we all know and hold dear. However, I do know that $1+1=2$ is an axiom. That is why I beg to differ. Neither of us have the required mathematical knowledge to convince each other. And that is why, we decided to turn to Math Stackexchange for help. What would be stack's opinion? Why didn't Dumbledore just hunt Voldemort down? How to get over "device or resource busy"? I tried to rm -rf a folder, and got "device or resource busy".  In Windows, I would have used LockHunter to resolve this. What's the linux equivalent? (Please give as answer a simple "unlock this" method, and not complete articles like . Although they're useful, I'm currently interested in just ASimpleMethodThatWorks™) How would one write object-oriented code in C? Can we have a black hole without a singularity? Assuming we have a sufficiently small and massive object such that it's escape velocity is greater than the speed of light, isn't this a black hole? It has an event horizon that light cannot escape, time freezes at this event horizon, etc. However this object is not a singularity.  If a large star's mass were compressed to the size of, say, a proton, it would certainly have these properties but it would still not be a singularity as a proton does have volume.  The reason "physics breaks down" at singularities is because we cannot divide by zero, but as long as the proton-sized object has volume, physics won't "break down", yet we still have an event horizon and an object that is invisible (but not undetectable) from the outside.  I have read the answers to  related question. I'm not sure if they don't address my specific question or if I don't understand the answers. Find the representing matrix with the respect to the standard basis Let $\Bbb R^2$ be a finite-dimensional vector space and $T:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}^2$ a linear operator. Let $[T]_B =  \begin {bmatrix}0 &amp; 0 \\-1 &amp; 1 \end{bmatrix} $ be a matrix representation of $T$ in the basis $B= (1,1),(-1,0)$.   How can I find the matrix $[T]_E$ where $E$ is the standard basis $(1,0),(0,1)$ if the transformation isn't given in the question?  Thanks,  Alan