How to display partial TOC (only one section at a time)?
Use the beamer TOC style elsewhere
Pass parameters to program started with Runas I am trying to start Performance monitor as different user. I found runas.exe but syntax for program arguments makes me go crazy. The following syntax works: C:\Windows\System32\runas.exe /user:domain\username perfmon.exe  But since perfmon.exe has the argument */res* the following line doesn't work: C:\Windows\System32\runas.exe /user:domain\username perfmon.exe /res  I tried to escape */res* but without any success. I tried: &quot;/res&quot; \&quot;/res\&quot;&quot; \&quot;\/res\&quot;&quot;  Any ideas? "going to" vs "will" How to create complex conditional clauses / queries? I've been reading the documentatoin on  and also studied the api description for  and  but I fail to create a $query with 3 -&gt;conditions:   select all between 0 and 100 but exclude 23, 48 and 97 select also 107, 123, 126 and 128   That's what I have tried so far:  $query-&gt;db_or()   -&gt;condition('my_field', array(107, 123, 126, 128), 'IN')   -&gt;condition(db_and()-&gt;condition('my_field', array(0, 100), 'BETWEEN')                       -&gt;condition('my_field', array(23, 48, 97), 'NOT IN'));   But I get the following error:  PHP Fatal error:  Call to undefined method SelectQuery::db_or() in [... first line]   I've tried to play around with the syntax like that:  $query-&gt;condition(-&gt;db_or()   -&gt;condition('my_field', array(107, 123, 126, 128), 'IN')   -&gt;condition(db_and()-&gt;condition('my_field', array(0, 100), 'BETWEEN')                       -&gt;condition('my_field', array(23, 48, 97), 'NOT IN')));   But again getting errors like that:  PHP Parse error:  syntax error, unexpected T_OBJECT_OPERATOR, expecting ')' in [... first line]   I also tried working with variables:  $cond01 = array('my_field', array(107, 123, 126, 128), 'IN'); $cond02 = array('my_field', array(0, 100), 'BETWEEN'); $cond03 = array('my_field', array(23, 48, 97), 'NOT IN'); $db_and = db_and(); $db_and-&gt;condition($cond02); $db_and-&gt;condition($cond03); $db_or = db_or(); $db_or-&gt;condition($cond01); $db_or-&gt;condition($db_and); $query-&gt;condition($db_or);   But this again yields drupal errors like that:  SQLSTATE[42S22]: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'   How to create a complex conditional database query with both AND and OR statements? Launch iOS app from sites Can we add functionality to the mobile site to view the page in the SE iOS app? It could be through  or a link at the bottom where the download link is.        I really don't care which, but right now there's just no way to do it. Is it possible to construct a multi-colored double-bladed lightsaber? I was just watching  video of some SW dueling at the 2015 World Fencing Championship, and wondered if it's actually possible in the SW universe to construct a multi-colored double-bladed lightsaber?   Are there any accounts of such a thing? If not, would it at least be theoretically possible to make one, or, are there obvious limitations? Card example:   There are a lot of cards that use counter as a noun. I did some Googling but I'm just not clear on what I need to use for counters.  Are they physical things I can buy and if so, what is a good online resource?  Can I just make do with coins or something? I am looking for a convenient way to set the background of tabular cells. I'd like to do two things:  (1) Set the background shaded in a color (2) Set the background hatched  I learned that the TikZ package provides means to do this but I am unable to come up with a solution that does not use matrices (such as here: ) but instead uses the tabular package.  Here's what I'd like to do:  \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline   1 &amp; \setBGGray 2 &amp; 3 \\\hline   4 &amp; 5 &amp; 6 \\\hline   7 &amp; \setBGHatched 8 &amp; 9 \\\hline \end{tabular} \end{document}   The output should look like this:    Can someone please help me achieving this using tabular (or tabularx) and TikZ? Best way to migrate a huge SQL Server database with low downtime over network Problem definition  Our database server needs to be transferred to an other datacenter. It runs on Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Enterprise (64-bit) and contains two databases of about 2TB and 1TB.  Having little to no downtime for this would be ideal.  Workload  Those databases are used for a .NET website and are constantly getting updated.   Having it not available over the weekend would be acceptable though. The currently in use DB would remain the only one in use until the switch over to the new one.  That switch would ideally be made just by changing DNS entries to point to the new DB server while making sure the DB is not being updated.  Also, time taken by this operation does not really matter as long as the switch from one server to the other (downtime) is kept low.  Approaches considered   Backup and restore  This has been done in the past but involved a high downtime even though it was done through an internal network, so more efficiently than through Internet Log shipping  As far as I understand, this approach would minimize downtime by configuring a master/slave and transferring  an exact copy of the master DB to its slave being read only. As mentioned above, no access to the slave would be necessary and we just need a way to have a replica of the master DB without data corruption.   It also seems to be quite efficient in terms of resources utilization and wouldn't impact to much the master performance.   I might be wrong about this approach so feel free to correct me. Database mirroring  I'm not too aware of that approach but it seems like a valid option. No need to have real time sync and performance of the master is quite important so asynchronous would be the way to go if this approach were to be chosen. Other options?  That server runs directly on bare metal hardware so lower level solutions are unfortunately not an option. Maybe there is a better way to get this done?   Constraints  As described, those databases are quite big to the point they are hard to maintain but that's an other problem.  The versions of SQL Server will be the same (Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Enterprise 64-bit).  It will have to be transferred over network between two datacenters so most probably over Internet. Having disks sent from one site to the other for an initial sync is unfortunately not an option. Having some sort of security for the transfer would be ideal but we will do the best of this situation.  That should give a quite good overview of our needs for this task and hopefully some of you had to face that situation before. Can the Flash do things like build muscle faster than normal (do his muscles grow right after a work-out or meal)? Can he heal faster than normal? Does he have a faster immune system to stop all illness or at least make the flu last 2 minutes or something along those lines? Proving for all integer $n \ge 2$, $\sqrt n < \frac{1}{\sqrt 1} + \frac{1}{\sqrt 2}+\frac{1}{\sqrt 3}+\cdots+\frac{1}{\sqrt n}$ In the , the key $k = (a, b)$ should have the following property, i.e. GCD of $a$ and the modulus should be 1:     $\gcd (a, m) = 1$, where $m$ is the set of possible moduli   My question is, why it is required that $a$ should have the above property? What is the significance of this? And why is $b$ excluded from this condition? Migrated questions with a nonexistent author should still show the author's name in the questions list I just noticed . Its author doesn't have an account on this site, which makes it show up like this on the homepage:        It looks like a simple thing - but it gets in the way of the 'flow' of the page:        Couldn't we somehow get the author's name, so that migrated questions with authors that don't have an account here still show up, like this:        Much better. Please? Which Python memory profiler is recommended? I want to know the memory usage of my Python application and specifically want to know what code blocks/portions or objects are consuming most memory. Google search shows a commercial one is  (Windows only).  And open source ones are  and .  I haven't tried anyone, so I wanted to know which one is the best considering:   Gives most details. I have to do least or no changes to my code. Is there a way to use the formatter that comes with eclipse, outside of eclipse?  I would like to format some java files using my formatter.xml file that I have configured using eclipse.  Does anyone have any code examples that would allow me to do this?  I would also like to use this standalone, so the specific jars that are used would be nice. Multiple Linked Objects with unique Materials / Group Materials override Where were the Avengers during Iron Man 3? Expectation inequality for a set and its subset. Given that a function $g(x)$ is a monotone increasing function. Its domain is an interval [c,d]. There are two sets $a_j \in A, j= 1,...,J$ and $b_k \in B,k=1,...,K$  on this interval, which satisfy $c_z \in C = B$\A and $c_z \geq a_j$ for all $a_j \in A$. For example, the interval $[c,d]=[0,8]$,$A=\{0,1,2,3,4,5\}$ and $B=\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7\}$. In this case, does the following inequality hold? If yes, could you give me some hints to prove that?  $$\frac{1}{K} \sum_{k=1}^{K}g(b_k) \geq \frac{1}{J} \sum_{j=1}^{J}g(a_j)$$ Let's get rid of the 10K flag queue are pretty cool... You get a birds-eye view of activity on the site, a &quot;dashboard&quot; view of what's happening. Some of the individual tools haven't scaled particularly well with Stack Overflow's growth, but the concept behind them is still sound: we trust you to enough to be a bee watcher now.  ...and then there's . What a let-down! Once upon a time, this queue contained spam and offensive flags, which one might reasonably assume were important enough to put in front of the more trusted members of the site. Re-flagging them brought them that much closer to deletion, while editing them offered salvation to some hapless author. Nowadays, it's a bunch of Not an Answer flags and a smattering of assorted cruft. 10K users can't even vote to delete these; only 20K users have that privilege. Re-flagging them does nothing but increase their priority in the moderator flag queue, where they frequently outrank more pressing issues;  has . Also, it's , and the behavior has diverged far enough from that of the moderator flag queue on which it is based that it has become an active hindrance to further development of the tooling there. Worst of all, we have  that's available to anyone with the editing privilege. It even has logic built in to prioritize answers likely to be deleted for users with . It's like we gave you a car for your 10th birthday, and then replaced it with a rusty bicycle when you turned 16. It was a nice idea, but it has outlived its usefulness. Proposed changes The /tools/flagged route goes away. Period. No replacement. The rest of the 10K tools stick around as informational pages. Not an Answer flags go into /review/low-quality, . Then we beef up the Low Quality review process to make better use of more experienced reviewers and solve this whole &quot;declined / helpful / disputed&quot; flag debate once and for all:  Effective # of reviews required == ReviewsRequired + # of applicable flags (where ReviewsRequired is 2 on Stack Overflow, 1 everywhere else). So 1 VLQ or NAA flag means EffectiveReviewsRequired=3. LQ tasks are not dequeued until one of the following conditions is met:  Post is edited from within review. Outcome: flags are marked &quot;helpful&quot; (current behavior). Post accumulates 3 Delete votes (can only happen when post scores &lt;= 0 and reviewers have &gt;= 20K rep). Outcome: post is deleted, flags are marked &quot;helpful&quot;. Task accumulates EffectiveReviewsRequired &quot;Looks Good&quot; reviews. Outcome: if the number of (Recommend)Delete reviews is &gt;= the number of Looks Good reviews, mark flags &quot;disputed&quot; and raise DisputedLowQuality mod flag. Otherwise, mark flags &quot;declined&quot;. Task accumulates 6* RecommendDelete + Delete reviews. Outcome: mark flags &quot;helpful&quot;. If the post scores &gt; 0 then raise DisputedLowQuality mod flag, else just delete post (current behavior).   As under the current system, flags on posts that've already completed one full review cycle without being deleted should skip /review and go directly into the mod queue.  End result  Flags get handled faster, more accurately, and with less wasted effort from 10K reviewers. Moderators are free to focus on situations that can't be handled by the community - the ! Developers are free to make enhancements to the moderator tooling without having to work around 10K user restrictions.  Questions Am I forgetting anything here? I haven't really spent much time in the 10K flag queue since back when it was filled with spam flags and therefore useful - is there a use-case that you depend on that would be lost with its removal? Post 'em below. *: on Stack Overflow, only . What potions actually grant fame or glory, or put a stopper in death? Are there any? ‘You are here to learn the subtle science and exact art of potionmaking,’ [Snape] began. He spoke in barely more than a whisper, but they caught every word – like Professor McGonagall, Snape had the gift of keeping a class silent without effort. ‘As there is little foolish wand-waving here, many of you will hardly believe this is magic. I don’t expect you will really understand the beauty of the softly simmering cauldron with its shimmering fumes, the delicate power of liquids that creep through human veins, bewitching the mind, ensnaring the senses ... I can teach you how to bottle fame, brew glory, even stopper death – if you aren’t as big a bunch of dunderheads as I usually have to teach.’&#185;   Philosopher's Stone - page 102 - Bloomsbury - chapter 8, The Potions Master   Are there any canon potions that actually grant fame or glory, or stopper death? I'm looking for specific canon-based answers from sources such as the Harry Potter books, interviews with J.K. Rowling, or information from Pottermore. Maybe because it's early I'm overlooking the obvious, but offhand I can't think of any canon potions that fit this criteria exactly.   &#185;I edited in the entire paragraph that I can teach you how to bottle fame, brew glory, even stopper death comes from for clarity. Hopefully this will be helpful and provide a better context for the comment in question. A proof that $1=2$. May I know why it’s false?