Typedef using templated nested class within a templated class
Where and why do I have to put the "template" and "typename" keywords?
CUDA Driver API vs. CUDA runtime When writing CUDA applications, you can either work at the driver level or at the runtime level as illustrated on this image (The libraries are CUFFT and CUBLAS for advanced math):   (source: )    I assume the tradeoff between the two are increased performance for the low-evel API but at the cost of increased complexity of code. What are the concrete differences and are there any significant things which you cannot do with the high-level API?  I am using CUDA.net for interop with C# and it is built as a copy of the driver API. This encourages writing a lot of rather complex code in C# while the C++ equivalent would be more simple using the runtime API. Is there anything to win by doing it this way? The one benefit I can see is that it is easier to integrate intelligent error handling with the rest of the C# code. Why is everything in minecraft opaque red and blue? Why is an untranslated string not showing up? In my module I have some custom strings. I use these in the t() function. When I go to admin/config/regional/translate/translate and filter the untranslated strings my custom strings do not show here.  What could be going wrong? Assume the continuum hypothesis is false, and add that as an axiom to ZF set theory. How many cardinalities are between the rationals and the reals in this case? Only one? Infinitely many? Countably many? Uncountably many? What are the possibilities to the quantity of counterexamples? Easy way to switch default sound output device Is there a way I can share the 3.42 GB download of Windows 8.1 from Windows Store? Show that any bounded linear functional on a normed linear space is continuous.   Can we say that it is uniformly continuous ?   Also, is it true, if we reverse the statement    any continuous  linear functional on a normed linear space is bounded ?? Let $T(n,x)$ be the nth Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind and let $U(n-1,x)$ the $(n-1)$th Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind. Would any one kindly help show that   1) $n$ is prime iff $T(n,x)$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$.  2) $n$ is prime iff $U(n-1,x)$, expressed in powers of $(x^2-1)$, is irreducible in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$.   Many Thanks!!    No "ordering" is implied here. The wording of the question was done in similar fashion  as any question in any math/research question. I do not see how a person who is asking for help would be ordering people to help.   Any way back to the topic,  For the first part of the question, I noticed that if n is prime, then T(n,x) satisfies  Eisenstein's Irreducibility Criterion. But I am not sure how to show if T(n,x) is irreducible then n is prime. Why are Bitmap-Fonts used automatically? How can I control HDD spin down time? I have 2 HDDs in my PC. Ubuntu is turning off the secondary HDD very quickly after about 15 minutes, which is short for me. I need to control this time. How can I do it?  I tried GNOME power management but did not find it useful. In general, when can I omit that from a sentence?   Can I omit that (emphasized) in sentence (2) below?        We say that such algorithms handle concept drift and can learn from time-changing data streams.   When the statistical properties of the target variable change, we say that concept drift has occurred.   She told me that some of her classmates failed.      To me, sentences (1) and (3) sound better without that. If I omit that from (2), it just doesn't sound right when I read it out loud. (I should point out I'm not a native speaker.)  How do you decide when to omit it? Is it just a matter of taste? (I know that is sometimes mandatory.)  Can you think of sentences that "sound better" with that? Can you think of sentences that "sound better" without that? Can you think of a few sentences where it is wrong to omit that? Getting Error while starting Google Map v2 SEO preference: does a site with WWW rank better than without WWW? After having read various articles on this site about WWW or Non-WWW website setup, ,  and , and after having setup a correct redirection rule in .Htaccess to at least eliminate duplicate contents (currently the non-www solution (e.g. http://example.com) I have a feeling that my site rank less since I changed this.   My confusion was strengthened by these two opponents:     &amp;     Could the change of www.example.com >> http://example.com have a factual impact on ranking?  say either is better or worse. Are they holding information back?  I am confused fellow folks...  As much as I would like to separate facts from fiction, I am aware that not all the good valid information is written. Not on google webmaster site and perhaps not elsewhere. If so it seems out of date!  Does or does not a WWW domain impact SEO/rank better than its NON-WWW version? (Given that you have setup a proper redirect to avoid duplicates and go with one) Derivative of function solved from NDSolve can't be plotted A number of questions "has been" or "have been" asked? Formally, is it correct to write:     A number of questions has been asked here.   or:     A number of questions have been asked here.   As a non-native speaker of English, I would prefer the former: the subject seems to be "number", therefore the verb ought to be singular, I'd say. However, the latter seems more common, and therefore I believe that my gut feeling is just plain wrong — but I would really like to have a definite answer.  Moreover, is it the same for "a myriad of", "a plethora of", and so on? So I have this word problem and I’m a bit confused about it. I have the answer and explanation but I still don’t understand: The half-life of carbon-14 is approximately 5730 years, while the half-life of carbon-12 is essentially infinite. If the ratio of carbon-14 to carbon-12 in a certain sample is 25% less than the normal ratio in nature, how old is the sample?     A. Less than 5730 years      B. Approximately 5730 years      C. Significantly greater than 5730 years, but less than 11460 years      D. Approximately 11460 years  Correct Answer: A Explanation: Because the half-life of carbon-12 is essentially infinite, a 25 percent decrease in the ratio of carbon-14 to carbon-12 means the same as a 25 percent decrease in the amount of carbon-14. If less than half of the carbon-14 has deteriorated, then less than one half-life has elapsed. Therefore, the sample is less than 5730 years old. Be careful with the wording here—the question states that the ratio is 25% less than the ratio in nature, not 25% of the ratio in nature, which would correspond to choice (D). How is the ratio of the carbon isotopes relevant to half-lives? What is the purpose of saying the half-life of an isotope is infinite? What is meant by “the normal ratio in nature”? Just based on the answer, it seems like the question said “25% of a carbon sample decayed, how old is this sample?” Obviously it’s younger than 5,730 years (the time for its first half life) because if only 25% decayed that means half a half-life has passed. I don’t see how isotopes and ratios would change this problem at all. Edit: Every answer here was very informative and helpful. It was tough to pick a best answer. I picked Cosma’s because it clicked with me. If you’re reading this and want to understand radiocarbon dating, look at every answer because there is some useful information in every answer When should I use the "strictfp" keyword in java? I've looked up what this does, but does anyone actually have an example of when you would use the strictfp keyword in Java? Has anyone actually found a use for this?  Would there be any side-effects of just putting it on all my floating point operations? Windows 10 upgrade led to grub rescue Mounting filesystem with special user id set Proof of Archimedes Principle Say I have an arbitrary body $\Omega$ and surface $\partial \Omega$ submerged in a hydrostatic fluid of density $\rho$ under the influence of gravity. How does one show ? i.e.  $$\int_{\partial \Omega}(P_0 + \rho g h)d\vec{S}=\text{vol}(\Omega)\rho g\vec{e_2}.$$