"I shall" vs. "I will" in an e-mail to a superior
When should I use "shall" versus "will"?
What is an example of Gâteaux differentiable but not Fréchet differentiable at a point in a finite-dimensional space? Let $V,W$ be nonzero normed spaces over $\mathbb{K}$ such that $V$ is finite-dimensional.  Let $E$ open in $\mathbb{K}$ and $p\in E$.  Let $f:E\rightarrow W$ be Gâteaux-differentiable at $p$.  Is $f$ necessarily Fréchet-differentiable at $p$ in this case?  I think this is not true in general, but cannot find a counterexample. What would be a counterexample? Multiplicative inverses for $Z_n$ How should a user's death be handled? I'm wondering how to approach duct work, piping, and wiring? In the past, I have used the spin tool to make corners, but I find it very cumbersome. How do you do duct work and piping? I have seen people use curves, but I find it's hard to get straight 90 degree angles or just uniform angling across the whole model. It's also hard connecting piping together if they started from different locations. Here's some reference: Can I transfer or sync purchased as well as non-purchased songs from my iPhone to my computer? Is it: My apples and orange are/is wrong? Simple question:     My apples and orange are wrong   or     My apples and orange is wrong   I am not a native English speaker, and I am having some trouble choosing between plural are or singular is for that kind of example. The  claims that likelihood and probability are distinct concepts.     In non-technical parlance, "likelihood" is usually a synonym for "probability," but in statistical usage there is a clear distinction in perspective: the number that is the probability of some observed outcomes given a set of parameter values is regarded as the likelihood of the set of parameter values given the observed outcomes.    Can someone give a more down-to-earth description of what this means?  In addition, some examples of how "probability" and "likelihood" disagree would be nice. If $\sigma_n=\frac{s_1+s_2+\cdots+s_n}{n}$ then $\operatorname{{lim sup}}\sigma_n \leq \operatorname{lim sup} s_n$ This is a question from the book Methods of Real Analysis by R. R. Goldberg.     If $(s_n)$ is a sequence of real numbers and if $$\sigma_n=\frac{s_1+s_2+\cdots+s_n}{n}$$ then prove that: $\operatorname{{lim sup}}\sigma_n \leq \operatorname{lim sup} s_n$.   I don't have any idea how to start working on this problem. Please help. Thanks. Refreshing open attribute table in ArcMap using ArcPy rather than ArcObjects? I am running the Calculate Field GP tool from the arcpy in ArcMap. When a row value is updated, it does not show up untill I use the Reload Cache tool (Table Options > Reload Cache). How do I refresh the attribute table automatically without using ArcObjects?  I have tried updating the definition query as @blah238 suggested , but this doesn't help. Resetting the data source is not an option because the feature class might be in the editing session and I don't want to lose the connection to the source data. PC won't boot (Asus P5K pro mainboard) No beeps, no screen output How do I add the kernel PPA? Spam gets fairly heavily punished - 100 reputation penalty, if I recall correctly, and the content itself gets hidden in the revision history.  Now if we just have some rubbish:     dfajiojaifojadiofjadhigaowkokaomdiovnuiyhioqejgioqejgio   I'm not talking about someone posting a question or comment as an answer (i.e. possibly just not knowing the rules or being frustrated with not having the required privileges), or someone making some really horrible attempt at answering the question, I'm talking about an answer that clearly shows absolutely no observation of any content on the page.  This, in my opinion, causes a similar amount of harm to the site - I'm inclined to say the fact that someone posts spam isn't as important as the fact that they're posting something that needs to be deleted, since we're likely going to delete it pretty quickly, and they're (likely) behaving maliciously, or am I wrong?  Why don't we treat this equally harshly, or why do we treat spam as harshly as we do?    Side notes:  I'm sure I've seen a few times where users get punished for posting spam when their link is likely actually relevant to the question and useful (should I flag these? They are still link-only answers, so they shouldn't really come back, and often I'm just not sure enough). While false positives are bad, it seems worse that we're treating worse behaviour better.  I'm assuming that's not what "abusive" in this reason is referring to: (I'm also not sure, off the top of my head, how this one gets treated)     It is offensive, abusive, or hate speech Received an email intended for another person How can I remove duplicate icons for "launched" java programs in the launcher? When launching java programs (like IntelliJ IDEA and Crashplan) in Natty's Unity launcher, duplicate icons are shown (see image).  For IntelliJ I created the .desktop file, for Crashplan the .desktop file is supplied with the application.  Is there something that can be changed in the .desktop files (or somewhere else) that can prevent this from occurring?  I couldn't find a bug report for unity itself but programs like Gnome-Do/Docky have   and had to make internal changes to their applications to prevent this.   In this image the 1st icon is the one created from the .desktop file and the second icon is after launching it.  Second icon disappears when closing the application.  Custom IntelliJ .desktop file  #!/usr/bin/env xdg-open [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Type=Application Terminal=false Icon[en_US]=/opt/idea/bin/idea128.png Name[en_US]=IntelliJ IDEA Exec=/opt/idea/bin/idea.sh Name=IntelliJ IDEA Icon=/opt/idea/bin/idea128.png StartupNotify=true   Crashplan provide .desktop file  [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Encoding=UTF-8 Name=CrashPlan Categories=; Comment=CrashPlan Desktop UI Comment[en_CA]=CrashPlan Desktop UI Exec=/usr/local/crashplan/bin/CrashPlanDesktop Icon=/usr/local/crashplan/skin/icon_app_64x64.png Hidden=false Terminal=false Type=Application GenericName[en_CA]= All html canvas shapes are given the color of the last object added Agreeing on a single shortened nomenclature? I've noticed across various stack exchange sites that when they refer to their own stack exchange on their site, they'll shorten the name to something similar to either:  EE.SE (Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange) OR Tex.Sx (LaTeX Stack Exchange)  Essentially they'll do XX.SE or XX.SX which has the possibility to generate some confusion for new users.    Have I not visited enough sites and just noticed an outlier or would it be beneficial for Stack Exchange sites to agree on a shortened name nomenclature? I can never figure out whether I should use who and whom. Most people use who for both colloquially, but some people say this is not correct.  What’s the rule for using who and whom correctly? From Windows Vista to 7, can I get rid of folder Windows.old? I've just changed my laptop OS from Windows Vista to Windows 7.  I didn't choose to have both OS together, I just want to have Windows 7.   I was specting Windows 7 instalation program to format/clean my HD and leave me most of its capacity for a fresh start. But I've found, once the OS has been isntalled, that all files and programs from the Vista era are still in my HD, in a folder called Windows.old   I don't need these programs and files, I want to have as much HD space as possible and Windows 7 as clean as possible, what should I do?  Can I just delete Windows.old folder? Would that affect the how Windows 7 works?  Maybe is because I ended up angry with Vista, but I don't like the fact that there wasn't any cleaning/formatting ..   Thanks a lot I don't know if this is a famous problem but my professor assigned this for a research project and I am hitting a dead end( I don't know what to do next).   Note: In $\phi(n)$ ; $n=rows=columns$ and this function throws out total combination of matrices that satisfies the following rule:  Rule for this square binary matrix:  Every Row and Column has two 1's.  So,    $$\phi(2)=1$$ \begin{bmatrix}    1 1 \\    1 1 \\ \end{bmatrix} $$\phi(3)=6$$  I can't write out all the possible matrices for $n=3$ but this is one of them (btw i did this by hand): \begin{bmatrix}    0 1 1 \\    1 0 1 \\ 1 1 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}   According to a program made by my friend, he told me:   $$\phi(4)=90$$ $$\phi(5)=2040$$ "To mentor someone during a project" vs. "to mentor someone on a project" ..., whom I mentored during his final semester's project.   ..., whom I mentored on his final semester's project.      Which of these two is grammatically correct? Since I am not talking about the final semester but the final semester's project, I am not very sure about during. Can someone help me with this?