Reduce number of input files for group plot in pgfplots
How to plot the first n rows of a table using pgfplots?
Recently, my iPhone 5 was stolen, and while I have a new iPhone 6, I received a message from a number of someone claiming to be in possession of the device, with a new number.   All images, contacts, Outlook mail, you name it, are still on the device.  While I realize it's my fault for not having it connected to iCloud to wipe manually, is there anything I can do to have this sensitive information wiped from the device? I'm on a Toshiba Satellite C660_EL trying to install .   lspci -v Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8188CE 802.11b/g/n WiFi Adapter (rev 01)   However, I can't get the driver from there to compile (I've installed build-essentials already). Running make (with or without sudo makes no difference) I get  make -C /lib/modules/3.8.0-19-generic/build M=/root/rtl_driver modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.8.0-19-generic'   CC [M]  /root/rtl_driver/base.o In file included from /root/rtl_driver/base.c:39:0: /root/rtl_driver/pci.h:247:15: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘rtl_pci_probe’ make[2]: *** [/root/rtl_driver/base.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/root/rtl_driver] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.8.0-19-generic' make: *** [all] Error 2   There is a relevant PPA here:  but there's no 13.04 build.   Thanks in advance for any help! Showing that $|N \cap Z(G)| > 1$ for normal subgroups of p-groups From the  article on Wikipedia, the following with regard to the Coriolis Effect on a rotating sphere:     By setting vn = 0, it can be seen immediately that (for positive φ and ω) a movement due east results in an acceleration due south. Similarly, setting ve = 0, it is seen that a movement due north results in an acceleration due east. In general, observed horizontally, looking along the direction of the movement causing the acceleration, the acceleration always is turned 90° to the right and of the same size regardless of the horizontal orientation.   My intuitive (but possibly incorrect) understanding is that if there are two points, Point A and Point B, at different latitudes in the Northern hemisphere, the Eastward velocities of these points are different because they are at different distances from the Earth's axis of rotation, and this causes the Coriolis effect for a rotating sphere.  If a projectile is fired due North from Point A near the Equator towards Point B near the North Pole, the projectile will start off with the higher Eastward velocity of Point A, and will land to the East of Point B, which is moving East at a slower velocity than the projectile.  Firstly, is that correct?  If that IS correct, that brings me to the quote off Wikipedia. The quote implies that, if a projectile is fired due East, it will experience a Coriolis force to the South. My intuitive explanation based on differences in velocities between origin and destination does not account for a Southwards movement at all, since the Point A and Point B velocities are identical if the points are on the same latitude.  What am I missing? Would a projectile fired due East or due West experience any North or South drift caused by the Coriolis effect (or anything else for that matter)?  Why? Create an Application without a Window How would you program a C/C++ application that could run without opening a window or console? At the start of A New Hope, when the corvette is being attacked, C3PO says something to the effect of:     There'll be no escape for the princess this time.   But when Luke stumbles onto Leia's message in R2D2, C3PO seems to not know who the figure in the message is:     I'm afraid I'm not quite sure, sir. I think she was a passenger on our last voyage. A person of some importance, sir - I believe.   Is C3PO feigning ignorance to protect her, or does he really not recognize her? Statement: $[a, b] \cap \mathbb{Q}$ in $\mathbb{Q}$ is not compact. Thus the interior of all compact subsets of $\mathbb{Q}$ is $\emptyset$.   I am trying to understand the first sentence. I read that a closed subspace of a compact space is compact, so for example, consider the unit interval $[0, 1]$ which is a compact space. Take a closed subspace $[0, 1] \cap \mathbb{Q}$ of $[0, 1]$. This set is closed since it just consists of all the rational numbers in between $0$ and $1$, including $0$ and $1$. So it is a closed subspace of a compact space. But why isn't this compact? Sending a simple TCP message using Netcat I am trying to use netcat to send a simple message over TCP, e.g. I want to send the digit 1.  So I understood that I write the following in the terminal, after installing netcat  netcat [ip-address] [port]  But how do I specify the message to be sent? i.e. where to I write "1" ? Can I uninstall and reinstall Ubuntu Software Center? Using the salesforce GUI it seams impossible to schedule a job every 15 minutes. Or more than once a day. How do I uninstall Ubuntu Wubi? Detecting TCP Client Disconnect What, precisely, is a confidence interval? How do I display a decimal value to 2 decimal places? Why couldn't Harry see Thestrals at the end of Goblet of Fire after the senseless and shocking death of Cedric Diggory?   At the end of Goblet of Fire, the carriages still appeared horseless to Harry:     Hermione turned away, smiling at the horseless carriages which were now trundling towards them up the drive, as Krum, looking surprised, but gratified, signed a fragment of   parchment for Ron.   Goblet of Fire - Page 629 - British Hardcover - Adult Edition   At the beginning of Order of the Phoenix, Harry sees the Thestrals for the first time:     Here stood the hundred or so horseless stagecoaches that always took the students above first year up to the castle. Harry glanced quickly at them, turned away to keep a lookout for Ron and Hermione, then did a double-take.   The coaches were no longer horseless. There were creatures standing between the carriage shafts.   Order of the Phoenix - Page 178 - British Hardcover - Adult Edition   We know that only those who have seen death can see Thestrals:     ‘Don’ worry, it won’ hurt yeh,’ said Hagrid patiently. ‘Righ’, now, who can tell me why some o’ yeh can see ’em an’ some can’t?’   Hermione raised her hand.   ‘Go on then,’ said Hagrid, beaming at her.   ‘The only people who can see Thestrals,’ she said, ‘are people who have seen death.’   ‘Tha’s exactly right,’ said Hagrid solemnly [...]   Order of the Phoenix - Page 394 - British Hardcover - Adult Edition   A month went by between Cedric's death and the end of the spring term -- is this enough time for Harry to have truly internalized Cedric's death? Goblet of Fire indicates that Harry was in shock following Cedric's murder, but was able to relate the story of Cedric's death to Mr. and Mrs. Diggory.     When he looked back, even a month later, Harry found he had few memories of the following days. It was as though he had been through too much to take in any more. The recollections he did have were very painful. The worst, perhaps, was the meeting with the Diggorys that took place the following morning.   [...]   ‘He suffered very little, then,’ she said, when Harry had told her how Cedric had died.'   Goblet of Fire - Page 621 - British Hardcover - Adult Edition   So, then, why couldn't Harry see Thestrals at the end of Goblet of Fire? Cannot find Underground Jungle Temple Looking for the name of a card-battle cartoon show Looking for a show about a group of three kids/teens who, using cards to change into monsters, fight and recover relics. I believe there are two or three other groups of three also trying to get the relics.  In the main group there are two boys and a girl. The boys were both white, one is from a farm and I don't know where the other is from. The girl was dark skinned and either black or blue hair. The three travelled around the world using a red plane.  I think they only use one monster primarily. The girl uses a monster created from gas and at one point is green. One of the boys uses a metal robot most of the time and at one point is given another better version of that card to use. I believe the episode for this was called something like green with envy.  All I'm getting from the internet is that it may be Chaotic, but that isn't the right show.  I also believe the girl's name was Mai and one of the boys were Ky, but I may be wrong. I have a large table that is already partitioned by an identifier (CustomerId). I have created new customers, and want to add new partitions to the table, and want to confirm the correct way to do this. My predecessor set this up and is no longer available so I cannot confirm.  There are currently partitions for 60 distinct CustomerIds (let's say 1-60), and a filegroup and file for each. I have created new filegroups and files for the new customers (61-68) and need to partition the existing data already in this table. So, the data that's already in the table, with customerId 61-68 needs to be moved into separate partitions.   I tried to use the partition wizard, but couldn't find an option for what I wanted. As far as I can tell, I need to run something like:  ALTER PARTITION SCHEME PS_Details  NEXT USED Filegroup61 ALTER PARTITION FUNCTION PF_Details ()  SPLIT RANGE (61)   I'm looking for someone to point me in the right direction as to best practice for this sort of thing. Do I take the data out of the table, into a new table stored in the Filegroup61 then switch the partition in? Not really sure how to approach this. Please add Right To Left text support in Stack Exchange You know, some of us read right to left...  Certain sites like  and  have an obvious need for this, as Arabic and Hebrew are Right To Left (RTL) languages. Many answers on those sites cite the Torah and the Quran respectively. Directly quoting these sources properly requires RTL text. "He was neither seer nor prophet" How would you explain the absence of an article? Here's a fragment from Jack London's Star Rover:     Wordsworth knew. He was neither seer nor prophet, but just ordinary man like you or any man. What he knew you know, any man knows. But he most aptly stated it in his passage that begins "Not in utter nakedness, not in entire forgetfulness.   To the best of my — admittedly sketchy — knowledge of grammar, the second sentence should read neither a seer nor (a) prophet, but just an ordinary man. Even if we accept the seer and the prophet as "poetic entities" ("father and son," "robber and robbed," "man to man," or whatever), logic would still dictate that ordinary man should be preceded by an an.  It is a well-known fact that Jack London's usage wasn't always up to par; his grammar, on the other hand, was always top-notch.  Logically, the sentence is grammatically incorrect (correct me if I'm wrong: no pun intended).  Illogically, it reads smoothly: intuitively, a native speaker understands that there's nothing wrong here.  However, those to whom English is not the first language cannot be expected to be intuitive in this case and would want an explanation. Any suggestions?