How do I solve the 'Verification Human CAPTCHA Secret sign' on Opera Mini?
Which browsers are officially supported, and what else do I need?
Deep learning model (LSTM) with temporal and non temporal attributes Selecting features by attributes using ogr2ogr? Jenkins + git: "tell me who you are" error, why does it need to tag? Size and density of neutron stars Most of the books which I looked at give approximately 10 km as the radius of a neutron star. Just yesterday I looked at a book by Dave Goldberg titled The Universe In the Rearview Mirror (2013) which says that they're "only about 5 km in radius" [p.225]. Is this true, [i.e., is there some recent evidence for this], or did he make a mistake here? Find The Last 3 digits of the number $2003^{2002^{2001}}$ Find The Last 3 digits of the number $2003^{2002^{2001}}$  BY number theory or otherwise,   Also i would like to ask is there a property observed in the numbers of the form $k^n$, where for some $k, n$ is varied then the digits of $k^n$ are periodic,  for example,  $2^n$,  its last digit is periodic with period 4, its second last digit is periodic $4\cdot 5 = 20$ its third last digit is periodic with periodic with period $20\cdot 5 =100$  I have observed this property with other numbers as well, though period might vary,for different values of $k$. How to determine if $n (n \geq 2)$ given numbers can be summed up to a certain number? I'm interested in knowing if there's a theorem for checking if combinations of $n$ given positive numbers can be summed up to a certain number.   For example, if I was given $n = 2$ numbers, which are $k_1$ and $k_2$, and I was asked if I could make a combination like $n_1 * k_1 + n_2 *k_2 = C$, all $\in \mathbb{N}^+$, I could check remainders to see if it is possible.   However, if $n = 3$ or higher, how could I check if combinations of $k_1, k_2, ..., k_n$ can be summed up to a $C$? Thank you for any inputs! I am fairly new to blender and I am trying to do something which I am assuming is fairly straight forward with no success. All I'm looking to do is emboss some text onto the curved part of a yogurt pot. Image attached below. What is the quickest and easiest way of doing this?  Thanks in advance Differences between strong and weak in Objective-C How can you explain that this double negation is not a double negation? Is there a rule in English about this kind of sentence?  PS / Do I have to mention Pink Floyd Copyright ? :-)  Edit : Since there are a lot of Pink Floyd related explanation, I'll bring a Freddy Mercury one : "I don't have time for no monkey business", which I also understand as "I don't have time for monkey business". Am I right ? Show f(x) is a Lipschitz function Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space and $ a \in X $ Show that $f(x) = d(x,a)$ is a Lipschitz function from X to $\Re$ Use this fact to show $S$ is an open subset of $X$: Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space and $a \in X, r &gt; 0.$ Let $S$={$x \in X : d(a,x) &gt; r$}  &gt;Lipschitz Defn:  Let $f$ be a function from $(X,d)$ to $(Y,\rho)$ $f$ is said to be Lipschitz if: $\exists$ K $\geq$ 0 s.t. $\rho( f(x_1) , f(x_2) ) \leq$ Kd($x_1$,$x_2$) $\forall$ $x_1 x_2 \in X$  &gt;Continuity Defn:  Let $(X,d)$ and $(Y,\rho)$ be metric spaces, and $f: X \to Y$ Then $f$ is continuous $iff$ f$^{-1}$($B$) = { $x \in X : f(x) \in B $} is an open subset of $X$, whenever $B$ is an open subset of $Y$  &gt;Triangle Inequality for a Metric:  $d(x,z) \leq d(x,y) + d(y,z)$   My first question is, am I thinking about this correctly? If $f(x)$ is a Lipschitz function, it is uniformly continuous If $f(x)$ is uniformly continuous, it is continuous at every point If $f(x)$ is continuous at every point $\Rightarrow$ the inverse images of open sets are open Hence $S$ is an open subset of $X$.  Secondly, how would you formally construct this? We know $f(x) = d(x,a)$ s.t. $f:X \to \Re$ By definition of Lipschitz we have $\exists  K \geq 0$  s.t. $\rho(f(x_1),f(x_2)) \leq Kd(x_1,x_2) \forall x_1,x_2 \in X$ &amp; since our codomain is $\Re$ $\rho(f(x_1),f(x_2)) = | d(x_1,a) - d(x_2,a) | \leq Kd(x_1,x_2)$ Taking $K=1$ $\ldots$ Help in finishing this off would be appreciated. Thanks. In my assignment I have to prove that the following function doesn't have a limit:  $$f(x)=\frac{x}{x-\lfloor{\sin x}\rfloor}$$ when $${x \to 0}$$  In other words, I have to prove that for every $\delta$ such that $0&lt;|x-{x_0}|&lt;\delta,$ $|f(x)-L|&gt;\epsilon$.  In fact, I don't even know how to start. Do I choose my $\delta$? I know that the sin function has certain values that's supposed to help me. How do I use it?  I have to prove this by definition, so I can't use limit arithmetic for example  Thanks. Quick question about curly braces not showing up Ii am writing a short code, so I doubt anything else in the code is causing the problem. This is the problematic line of code:  \[ M_R := \max {|f(z)|: |z - z_0| = R }\le M\]   It doesn't show the curly braces. I've tried using \left{ and \right} but to no avail.  What should I do?  Thank you Limit of function of hyperbolic Is AncestryDNA match of 1,655 cM a half sibling? Shared DNA: 1,655 cM across 46 segments.   Can someone that shows this as one of my matches on AncestryDNA be a half sibling? What is the Mediator in this Feynman Diagram $q\bar{q} \rightarrow gg$? Let's consider the t-channel version of the process $q\bar{q} \rightarrow gg$. What is the mediator in this case, a $q$ or a $\bar{q}$? Naively, I would have thought a $q$ (as to have one fermion line), but I am not $100 \%$ sure. Using Inclusion/Exclusion to solve $x_1+x_2+x_3=15$ with $x_1,x_2\leq 5$ and $x_3\leq 7$ for non negative integers $x_1,x_2,x_3$ I want to solve for:     Number of integers solutions to the equation $x_1+x_2+x_3=15$ with $x_1,x_2\leq 5$ and $x_3\leq 7$ for non negative integers $x_1,x_2,x_3$   How can this be done using the principle of inclusion/exclusion? Remove Gnome Notifications or set Permanent Do not Disturb Does a US citizen traveling by plane in Mexico (international flight), for example from Mexicali to Mexico City need to have a passport? Why is the Earth so fat? I made a naive calculation of the height of Earth's equatorial bulge and found that it should be about 10km.  The true height is about 20km.  My question is: why is there this discrepancy?  The calculation I did was to imagine placing a ball down on the spinning Earth.  Wherever I place it, it shouldn't move.  The gravitational potential per unit mass of the ball is $hg$, with $h$ the height above the pole-to-center distance of the Earth (call that $R$) and $g$ gravitational acceleration.  Gravity wants to pull the ball towards the poles, away from the bulge.  It is balanced by the centrifugal force, which has a potential $-\omega^2R^2\sin^2\theta/2$ per unit mass, with $\omega$ Earth's angular velocity and $\theta$ the angle from the north pole.  This comes taking what in an inertial frame would be the ball's kinetic energy and making it a potential in the accelerating frame.  If the ball doesn't move, this potential must be constant, so  $$U = hg - \frac{(\omega R \sin\theta)^2}{2} = \textrm{const}$$  we might as well let the constant be zero and write  $$h = \frac{(\omega R \sin\theta)^2}{2g}$$  For the Earth,   $$R = 6.4*10^6m$$  $$\omega = \frac{2\pi}{24\ \textrm{hours}}$$  $$g = 9.8\ m/s^2$$  This gives 10.8 km when $\theta = \pi/2$, so the equatorial bulge should be roughly that large.    , the Earth is 42.72 km wider in diameter at the equator than pole-to-pole, meaning the bulge is about twice as large as I expected.  (Wikipedia cites diameter; I estimated radius.)  Where is the extra bulge coming from?  My simple calculation uses $g$ and $R$ as constants, but neither varies more than a percent or so.  It's true the Earth does not have uniform density, but it's not clear to me how this should affect the calculation, so long as the density distribution is still spherically-symmetric (or nearly so).  (Wikipedia also includes , without derivation, that agrees with mine.) Make clear which profile data is visible to whom