How to screenshot website in JavaScript client-side / how Google did it? (no need to access HDD)
Using HTML5/Canvas/JavaScript to take in-browser screenshots
Why do birds sitting on electric wires not get shocked? Create violine plots I use pgfplots for most of my plots. Now I need to add a . Is this possible with pgfplots or any other package? Foolproof way to ensure Google news pulls the correct image for its thumbnails? Google news results have an acompanying thumbnail next to articles that show up in the results.    If Google's crawler can't find a thumbnail to pull from our site, it uses its next best guess from another site, therefore linking the image to another site but still uses our headline.  Example:  Headline from Reuters, Image from Livemint:   Our pages absolutely have images, they are not massive in file-size or dimensions, yet we are not having them pulled / crawled correctly.  We have read up on the suggestions from Google, and from others around the web and nothing is panning out.  Has anyone had any experience where they can ensure Google news will pull a thumbnail of our choosing? Confusing [...] List in Python: What is it? So I was writing up a simple binary tree in Python and came across [...]  I don't believe this to be related to the Ellipsis object, more it seems to have something to do with an infinity loop (due to Python's shallow copy?). The source of this infinity loop and why it doesn't get expanded while expanding when accessed is something I'm completely lost to, however   &gt;&gt;&gt; a [[[[[], [], 8, 3], [[], [], 3, 2], 6, 3], [], 1, 4], [[], [], -4, 2], 0, 0] &gt;&gt;&gt; Keys(a)#With a+b [0, 1, 6, 8, 3, -4] &gt;&gt;&gt; Keys(a)#With [a,b] [8, [...], [...], 3, [...], [...], 6, [...], [...], 1, [...], [...], -4, [...], [...], 0, [...], [...]] &gt;&gt;&gt; Keys(a)[1]#?? [8, [...], [...], 3, [...], [...], 6, [...], [...], 1, [...], [...], -4, [...], [...], 0, [...], [...], 8, [...], [...], 3, [...], [...], 6, [...], [...], 1, [...], [...], -4, [...], [...], 0, [...], [...]]     Version using a+b  def Keys(x,y=[]):     if len(x):y+=[x[2]]+Keys(x[0],y)+Keys(x[1],y)#Though it seems I was using y=y[:]+, this actually outputs an ugly mess     return y   version using [a,b]  def Keys(x,y=[]):     if len(x):y+=[x[2],Keys(x[0],y),Keys(x[1],y)]     return y   So what exactly is [...]? why does loop-cut-and-slide ignore some faces but not others? why does the loop-cut-and-slide operation ignore certain faces but happily cut others?the model is symmetrical so it is a bit strange to pick 3 faces that won't get cut. I tried applying it to see if it was just a graphics glitch causing the purple line to not display over everything, but it did end up cutting only what the line was selecting, instead of the whole mesh.    as requested,here's a paste of the blend: I have named him/he who shall not be named. Which of these is correct? I think it should be "him" because "him" is a direct object in this context. In this context, "him/he who shall not be named" is not a proper noun. Calculating CR of monsters that do not deal calculable damage How does one prove that if $n \mid (a^{n}-b^{n}) \ \Longrightarrow$ $ \displaystyle n \mid \frac{a^{n}-b^{n}}{a-b}$ where $a,b, n \in \mathbb{N}$.  What i thought of is to consider $$(a-b)^{n} \equiv a^{n} + (-1)^{n}b^{n} \ (\text{mod} \ n)$$ and if we suppose that $n$ is odd then we have, $$(a-b)^{n} \equiv a^{n} -b^{n} \ (\text{mod} \ n)$$ and since $n \mid (a^{n} - b^{n})$ we have $$(a-b)^{n} \equiv 0 \ (\text{mod} \ n) $$  I think i am far away from the conclusion of the problem, but this is what i could work on regarding the problem. Are the floor functions of $0.999\cdots$ and 1 equal?  It is true that $0.999\cdots=1$ but how does one justifies the integer part of $0.999\cdots$ being 1 , where it is not, or alternatively without using $0.999\cdots=1$ how can we show that  $\lfloor0.999\cdots\rfloor = \lfloor 1 \rfloor$ ? LaTeX Classes or Styles for Schedules and/or Calendars? Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions I am recently testing an assertion that I have concluded namely that atheism is a faith based position just like theism is a faith based position.  The reason I arrived at this conclusion is that theists have no proof that God actually exists. It's purely a matter of faith. Yes, there maybe strong implicit proof that God exists in their opinion (scriptures, history, etc) but there is no concrete proof of God's existence. In my view, atheists also suffer from the same problem of providing a proof of their position. Specifically that they cannot prove that God is non-existent.  The typical rebuttal I get is that the burden of proof is on the theists. But I view this as a cop out and they hide behind the wall of burden of proof which is just a bias in the debate.  Given the above, I claim that both atheism and theism are positions based on faith. Would it be incorrect to claim that? How to add an extra level of sections with headings below \subsubsection Cleaning Contaminated Disc Rotors I've had an eternal struggle with my current bike over brake contamination. The levers and calipers are shimano ultegra r8000, so the latest and (almost) greatest.  I first noticed it when I took it to a repair shop (i no longer use) for a bleed, it came back and the front brake would squeal like crazy and at low speeds had little to no braking force. You can stop from speed but then struggle to come to a halt without using your foot.  At around 2000 miles I tried to replace the brake pads, when I took them out they were black with grime on both sets (front &amp; back), not to mention worn down to the metal. I replaced them with the L04C sintered pads, gave the callipers a good cleaning with a towel (no chemicals) and fitted the new set.  Annoyingly all of my braking issues are back, now I probably should have cleaned the rotors, I simply used some muc off disc brake cleaner on them. I would like to know the best way to clean the rotors, I've inspected the pads and they are looking fairly black now, with plenty of tread left. I'm going to abandon these pads and fit a new set. For the rotors I plan to completely remove them from the wheels (they are center lock fitted) and try and treat them off the bike, what is the best way to fully clean them? They have plenty of wear left in them but you can see these black grooves in them, and plenty of muck on the back that I struggle to get off.  Below are images of the rotors after soaking them in disc brake cleaners, waiting and then wiping them down with a clean, microfiber towel.   Front Wheel Outside Rotor   Front Wheel Inside Rotor - note the increased dirt on this side  Looking at ways people clean their disc rotors, I've seen plenty of suggestions that I would need to burn the contaminants off the discs. Would the best approach be to remove them and use a blowtorch, should I soak them in some nasty chemicals overnight before I try to heat them? Do I try baking them in the oven?  And finally, what is the best way to prevent the brakes from becoming contaminated in the future? it's really off putting when they squeal and don't perform how I'd expect because it means I'm more reserved whilst out riding on the bike, leading to reduced time riding around outside. I commute on this bike (50 miles a week) and then ride about 50 on the weekends also, so it see's it's fair share of road use. I tend to wash it once after my big ride on saturdays and will rinse it off if it's been raining, any day that occurs (since I live in north east england, the acid rain..). I've owned disc brake bikes before and never had half the issues I've had with this, I had a cheap trek with tektro brakes and the brakes were sharper and never had any issues with contamination whatsoever (i did around 500 miles on that bike before a motorist happened).  Thanks for any and all advice :) Exclude TeX.SE question titles from MathJax parsing in Hot Network Questions Recently, the TeX.SE question  got onto the Hot Network Questions list.  Like many questions on TeX.SE, it contains some TeX markup in its title.  Unfortunately, on , this markup gets parsed and rendered as math:    I propose that either:   the entire Hot Network Questions sidebar should be excluded from MathJax parsing by styling it with the tex2jax_ignore class, or at least, any hot questions from TeX.SE should be so excluded from MathJax parsing.   Or I suppose we could always implement , which asks for all questions with TeX in the title to be excluded from Hot Network Questions entirely.  That might be throwing out the baby with the bathwater, though.    Ps. This issue is partially masked by , which causes MathJax not to be rendered in many elements that are hidden by default and revealed using jQuery .show(), such as all but the first five questions in the Hot Network Questions sidebar.  The  user script contains a generic fix for that bug, so users who have it installed will see this issue more frequently, but it occurs even without SOUP whenever a question with TeX markup in the title happens to show up among the top five hot questions that are always visible by default. How do I change the plymouth bootscreen? Construction of a Borel set with positive but not full measure in each interval I was wondering how one can construct a Borel set that doesn't have full measure on any interval of the real line but does have positive measure everywhere.   To be precise, if $\mu$ denotes Lebesgue measure, how would one construct a Borel set $A \subset \mathbb{R}$ such that $$0 &lt; \mu(A \cap I) &lt; \mu(I)$$ for every interval $I$ in $\mathbb{R}$?   Moreover, would such a set necessarily have to contain infinite measure? How can I explain how to play D&D to new players without them falling asleep from boredom? Some of my friends just started playing Dungeons &amp; Dragons [5e] for the first time and don't know anything about how to play. I have tried explaining to them the things that are completely necessary and teach them the rest while playing but I could not get them to understand. None of them have a players handbook and they can't afford one and they really want to play. I really want a simple way to explain the basics and since I have a habit of explaining things in ways that are much too complicated. I have already told them the basic rules so all I need to know is a simple way to explain how to play. Possible pitfalls of using this (extension method based) shorthand I was recently reading some Lord of the Rings/Stargate SG-1 crossover fanfiction. It is a guilty pleasure, I admit :) In this story, it was suggested by Col. O'Neill to destroy the Ring using a nuclear device. Truth be told I stopped reading at this point, as it was getting to be a little much even for me.  Obviously, this is not canonical in either universe, but it made me wonder: When Elrond said that "only in the fires of Mt. Doom may it be unmade," was he speaking literally? Or was this merely the only known active volcano in Middle Earth? In other words, was whatever magic that protected the One Ring from damage location-based or did it just make it very resistant to destructive force, and Mt. Doom just happened to be hot enough to do this? I know there is (understandably) little information about such technicalities of how magic works in Middle Earth, but I'll accept any reasonable conjecture/consensus as an answer. Where to ask Question that can be flagged too broad or opinion based