Example of ideal which is not primary, but its radical is prime.
Is it true that an ideal is primary iff its radical is prime?
About multi-root search in Mathematica for transcendental equations Clipping raster with vector boundaries using QGIS In QGIS I would like to clip a raster precipitation layer using an admin boundary layer that is vector data. However the Geoprocessing tools seem to be usable only for vector data. How can I clip this precipitation layer? the converse of Pythagoras Theorem Is it possible to prove the converse of the Pythagoras theorem with out a geometric proof?.That is from $a^2+b^2=c^2$ to $\Theta=90^\circ$ Accessing the index in 'for' loops? Letter O with vertical line: operator null How to loop the particle simulation indefinitely? Hide page numbering but retain header/footer I would like to remove page numbering on a specific page. However, the header and footer should remain intact. If I try:  \thispagestyle{empty}   The header and footer disappear. What is the recommended way of removing just the page number? Overriding public virtual functions with private functions in C++ C# How do I click a button by hitting Enter whilst textbox has focus? I'm working with a WinForm app in C#, after I type something in a textbox I want to hit the Enter key but the textbox still has focus (flashing cursor is still in textbox), how can I achieve this? Do paths in Adobe Photoshop have to be closed? I am working to convert a png to a vector graphic.  I am outlining the image using the pen tool.  Photoshop insists that the pen tool produce closed loops in order for me to use the "Stroke path..." tool.  Why is this? Wikipedia claims this but only cites an offline proof:  $$\lim_{n\to\infty} 2^n \sqrt{2-\sqrt{2+\cdots+ \sqrt 2}} = \pi$$  for $n$ square roots and one minus sign. The formula is not the "usual" one, like Taylor series or something like that, so I can't easily prove it. I wrote a little script to calculate it and it's clearly visible, but that's not a proof. JavaScript property access: dot notation vs. brackets? Can't understand how to draw it. How do I hide posts matching my ignored tags? Where and how do I go about hiding the posts that match any of the tags on my ignored list? I read a short story (I think, but it might have been a novel), where most races discover a very easy way to travel faster than light at a certain point in their technological development.   What I remember:   The guys in wooden ships bounced around subjugating the people without FTL travel. Earth had never figured out the FTL, and so had poured its effort in a different path, achieving present day technology. The aliens were freaking out about handing the humans FTL travel. The story was told from the point of view of the aliens. I read it in the last 10 years, but there is no telling how old it actually was, although I do remember them mentioning F-18s or F-14s. $\aleph_1$ is the cardinality of the countable ordinals. It is the least cardinal number greater than $\aleph_0$, and assuming the continuum hypothesis it's equal to $\mathfrak{c}$, the cardinality of the the real numbers.    My question is, is it possible for all $\aleph_1$ subsets of $\Bbb{R}$ to have Lebesgue measure $0$?  This is, of course, impossible assuming the continuum hypothesis, because then all sets of real numbers would have measure $0$, which is absurd.  But is $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + $\lnot\mathsf{CH}$ + "all subset of $\Bbb{R}$ of cardinality $\aleph_1$ have Lebesgue measure $0$" consistent?  If not, what if we replaced Lebesgue measure with some other measure?  It may be worth noting that, although there may be subsets of $\Bbb{R}$ with cardinality $\aleph_1$, there are no subsets of $\Bbb{R}$ which have the order-type $\omega_1$ (the order-type of the countable ordinals) under the usual ordering on $\Bbb{R}$.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you in Advance. I showed up here to write a perfectly normal rant about misaligned pixels, and there's a big fat checkbox cluttering up the "Ask" page:    WHAT THE EEEEK IS THIS NEW ABOMINATION? example of not surjective isometry on a bounded not closed set. Which pronoun to refer to "person"? It? He or She? They? "When he found his seat on the plane, Sam recognized the person who was sitting in the seat next to his. It? She? was a woman he knew."  Which is more common/natural? Isn't 'it' more correct – grammatically speaking – than 'she', since 'a person' can be a 'he' or a 'she', and obviously you cannot use the singular 'they' here? I do love to listen to music while watching text YouTube videos, but I can't because YouTube can't be muted.  I use the respect audio focus in  Music Player.  I have tried App Volume Control but it did nothing!