Icons broken in search results of Windows 10
Windows Metro apps have wrong icon in search UI
Consider the atomic spectrum (absorption) of hydrogen.     The Bohr's model postulates that there are only certain fixed orbits allowed in the atom. An atom will only be excited to a higher orbit, if it is supplied with light that precisely matches the difference in energies between the two orbits.   But how precise does 'precisely' mean. Of course, if we need energy $E$ to excite the electron to a higher energy level, and I supply a photon with just $E/2$ I would expect nothing to happen (since the electron cannot occupy an orbit between the allowed ones). But what if I supplied a photon with energy $0.99E$, or $1.0001E$ or some such number. What will happen then?  I think that the electron should still undergo excitation precisely because the lines we observe in the line spectrum have some thickness. Which means that for a given transition, the atom absorbs frequencies in a certain range.   Is my reasoning correct? If not, why? How does Bohr's model explain this? How about modern theory?   If I'm right, what is the range of values that an atom can 'accept' for a given transition? Some people (me) would prefer the straight GNOME experience as opposed to the Unity style desktop offered in Ubuntu 17.10.  How can I get the standard GNOME desktop and interface? ASP.NET "special" tags Why aren't we sterilizing N95 masks? Laravel - Populating Select List with Derived Values Approximation of real number to the power of irrational Say I have two numbers, $c\in\Bbb R^+\,,q\in\Bbb{R\setminus Q}$.  Is there a way to approximate the value of $c^q$?  This question bugging me because of how simple it sound in compare to how complicated it is. First I want to understand what a power of irrational number is, when talking about $\Bbb R^+$(I use this domain for sake of simplicity) we have very well defined actions for power a rational number, we can even use some theorems to get $c^{a/b}=\sqrt[b]{c^a}$, but when I am dealing with irrational number I can not do this.  I know that we have some definition for this because the solution of the equation $2^x=3$ is irrational.  So what exactly does it mean to take something to a irrational power and is there a way to approximate a numeric value for this? Do you have to want to hurt someone for the cruciatus curse to work? OK so the scene where Harry sees Voldemort making Draco tutur Rowel brings a few questions to my mind.      he felt the rage that did not belong to him posses his soul, saw a long room, only light by fire light, and the grate blond Death Eater on the floor,screaming and writhing, and a slighter figure standing over him, wand outstretched, while Harry spoke in a high, cold, merciless voice.   "More, Rowel, or shall we end it and feed you to Nagini? Lord Voldemort is not sure he will forgive you this time...You called me back for this, to tell me Harry Potter has escaped again? Draco, give Rowel another taste of our displeasure... do it, or feel, my wrath yourself!"   A log fell in the fire: flames reared, their light darting across a terrified, pointed white face-   I remember in the Order of the Phoenix Harry tries to do the cruciatus curse on Bellatrix, it doesn't work. She say this is because Harry doesn't mean it, he doesn't want to hurt he enough. If she's right about that (I'm sure she is) I don't see how Draco is managing to make to make Rowel writhe and scream, because it is clear he doesn't want to be doing it.   Also Harry was actually angry at Bellatrix and if his anger at her killing his godfather won't work... well you get my drift.   I know Draco is probably better at magic, but I feel Bellatrix is right, you really have to want them to hurt for it to work.  Next thing, Voldemort's having Draco do it why? Is he doing to upset Lucius, because that and lot of effort to go to, seeing as Voldemort is angry and he'd probably do a better job himself. Or is he trying to train himself a new soldier, I mean the other ones are getting old. I have created some search entries in Google Chrome using 'Edit search engines'.  How can I share some of these entries with my colleagues? Difference between if () { } and if () : endif; Are there any differences between...  if ($value) {  }   ...and...  if ($value):  endif;   ? Lightsaber blade "weight" in-universe Why does an electron shell further away from nucleus has higher energy level? Using electrical potential energy $V=\frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{Q_1 Q_2}{r}$ , a particle further away from nucleus has lower magnitude of energy.  Using Coulomb's law, a particle further away from nucleus experiences weaker attraction, hence less energy is needed to maintain orbit$^\star$ around that e-shell compared to a electron shell closer to nucleus, hence the one closer to nucleus supposedly should have higher energy.  $^\star$I know in reality $e^-$ does not orbit around a atom, but its position exists as a probability density or radial probability function. What is the difference between a predicate and function? I need to to understand the difference between predicates and functions in the context of Clasual Form Logic in order to define the Herbrand universe.  If I have p(x) :- q(f(x)) would I be right in saying that p and q are predicates while f is a function because it is "nested"?  By this thinking then if I have p(x) :- q(x) both p and q are predicates and I have no functions?  If this is incorrect then how can I tell the difference between a predicate and function? How old is too old for a PhD? Are there any age limits (formal, informal, or guidelines) that schools use when deciding to accept someone into a PhD program? I'm most curious about the upper age limits. For example, will most schools accept someone in their 40's? How about their 50's? Friendly_Id and Reserved Words -- How can i replace the reserved word? How to forward X over SSH to run graphics applications remotely? I have a machine running Ubuntu which I SSH to from my Fedora 14 machine. I want to forward X from the Ubuntu machine back to Fedora so I can run graphical programs remotely. Both machines are on a LAN.  I know that the -X option enables X11 forwarding in SSH, but I feel like I am missing some of the steps.  What are the required steps to forward X from a Ubuntu machine to Fedora over SSH? customize of autoref The question Is there any way to automatically scale and put an entire document on an A0 page? The thesis for which this is to be done is available as LaTeX code, as well as PDF output. Of course I know it is possible to do this manually, but I would prefer a LaTeX solution.  A small background Our university introduced a new page limit for master theses. This is not exactly appreciated by the teaching staff as well as students. To make a little joke, we decided to try to arrange an entire thesis (of approximately 200 pages) on a A0 poster, put it up in the hallway, and put a magnification glass next to it with a note saying: &quot;New page limit introduced: 1 page maximum for all upcoming theses!&quot;  The final result As some of you asked for this: below you can see a picture of the final result. (I &quot;professionally removed&quot; some of the sensitiv information.) We presented the poster during my final presentation and everyone liked it a lot! Now, it is on display next to my office and is still attracting some attention once in a while. What is the square root of complex number i? Sequential renaming of files I found an answer for  which works fine for renaming filenames as follows :  1.jpg &gt; 00001.jpg 2.jpg &gt; 00002.jpg . . . 9.jpg &gt; 00009.jpg   That uses the following command:  rename 's/\d+/sprintf("%05d", $&amp;)/e' *.jpg   But my filenames aren't numeric. They are an alphanumeric sequence, like: a.jpg, b.jpg, c.jpg...... m.jpg.  In a similar way to the original question, I want to rename these so they display in the correct sequence. How do I do this? In Robert Dixon's Mathographics, a regular pentagon is constructed with straightedge and compass only.  It is the pentagon $ABCDE$ pictured below.   I am having trouble seeing why the central angles are all $72^\circ$, though. Can anyone provide the proof?  Also, does anyone know who this construction is due to? I haven't seen it anywhere, other than in Dixon's book; is it Dixon's result?     The result appears much more impressive without all the labels (which are slightly misplaced, please excuse this); however, I provided those so that answering would be easier. Also, it makes it easy to describe the steps in the construction:  1) Draw a circle (the red one)  with center $h$.  2) Draw the perpendicular lines $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ through $h$. Locate the points of intersection $f$, $B$, and $g$ with the red circle.  3) Bisect the line segment $gh$. Denote the center by $a$.  4) Draw the green circle with center $a$ and radius $ah$.  5) Draw the other green circle (as in (3) and 4)).  6) Draw the line segment through $f$ and $a$.  7) Locate the points of intersection $b$ and $c$ of the line segment with the circle constructed in step 4).  8) Draw the blue arcs (both have center at $f$ and the radii are $fb$ and $fc$).  9) Locate the points of intersection $A$, $C$, $D$, and $E$.   I actually have the solution to the first question, and will post it unless a more elegant explanation is provided (which is probably likely).  However, I find this construction particularly   beautiful, and would like to know who it is attributed to (Dixon doesn't say, explicitly).