How to apply self in method parameter in Python
Initialize parameter of method with default value
Why are SO participants so unfriendly? Changing order of features in shapefile Get full path of the files in PowerShell How to search based on part of file name in Google Drive I'd like to be able to find all files in my Google drive that contain the string "_INSTRUCTION_" in the file name. Is there a way to do this?  EDIT 1: When I search for "RMA2013", I should get a dropdown with several options. As you can see, there are several Word and .pdf files with the phrase "RMA2013". Still I get no dropdown help:   And even if I click the search button, I get nothing: We've just been learning about complex numbers in class, and I don't really see why they're called numbers.  Originally, a number used to be a means of counting (natural numbers).  Then we extend these numbers to instances of owing other people money for instance (integers).  After that, we consider fractions when we need to split things like 2 pizzas between three people.  We then (skipping the algebraic numbers for the purposes of practicality), we use the real numbers to describe any length; e.g. the length of a diagonal of a unit square.  But this is when our original definition of a number fails to make sense- when we consider complex numbers, which brings me to my main question: what is a rigorous definition of 'number'?  Wikipedia claims that "A number is a mathematical object used to count, label, and measure", but this definition fails to make sense after we extend $\mathbb{R}$.     Does anyone know of any definition of number that can be generalised to complex numbers as well (and even higher order number systems like the quaternions)? Isometry from Manhattan plane to Euclidean plane? Does there exist an isometry from a Manhattan plane $A$ to a Euclidean plane $B$? I.e. a function $\varphi:A \to B$ that suffices $\|\varphi(a)\|_B = \|a\|_A$ for all $a \in A$, where  $\| \cdot \|_A$ is the Manhattan norm and $\| \cdot \|_B$ the Euclidean norm. Pointer to class data member "::*" I came across this strange code snippet which compiles fine:  class Car {     public:     int speed; };  int main() {     int Car::*pSpeed = &amp;Car::speed;     return 0; }   Why does C++ have this pointer to a non-static data member of a class? What is the use of this strange pointer in real code? Visiting Russia as an Arab. Am I going to be hassled? Windows 10 lets you 'schedule' a reboot for later. I want to disable it.  Evidently Windows scheduled itself for a reboot last night when I wasn't looking and just closed everything I had been working on the night before.  I reboot on the regular; I don't need Windows to do that for me.  Can I disable it completely? I don't mind if it downloads everything, and then says "hey, you should reboot," but it should never reboot itself, ever.  I'm using the "Pro" edition of Windows 10. The Definitive C++ Book Guide and List This question attempts to collect the few pearls among the dozens of bad C++ books that are published every year. Unlike many other programming languages, which are often picked up on the go from tutorials found on the Internet, few are able to quickly pick up C++ without studying a well-written C++ book. It is way too big and complex for doing this. In fact, it is so big and complex, that there are very many very bad C++ books out there. And we are not talking about bad style, but things like sporting glaringly obvious factual errors and promoting abysmally bad programming styles. Please edit the accepted answer to provide quality books and an approximate skill level — preferably after discussing your addition in . (The regulars might mercilessly undo your work if they disagree with a recommendation.) Add a short blurb/description about each book that you have personally read/benefited from. Feel free to debate quality, headings, etc. Books that meet the criteria will be added to the list.  Books that have reviews by the Association of C and C++ Users (ACCU) have links to the review. *Note: FAQs and other resources can be found in the  and under . Does the PHB+1 character-building limit in Adventurers League include spells? I’m thinking of trying out a Hexblade Warlock in Adventurers League, which limits players to PHB+1 for character-building.  The problem I have with this is that the Hexblade is from Xanathar's Guide to Everything, but I really want the booming blade cantrip as well from the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide. Is this legal in Adventurers League play? Fancy vertical timeline I'd like to have a timeline as similar as possible to this with the addition of being able to add a logo at the left of each textbullet, but I've got no clue at all:    Thanks very much in advance for any help :)  p.s. I've stumbled upon this answer () but I don't how to modify it to get what I want! not able to execute multiple commands on multiple linux machines? Converting PostGIS point to text causing loss of data? I have a road network and want to test connectivity between the features.  I am having trouble with two specific features, the rest of the dataset is functioning just fine.  When I get those 2 links' start &amp; end locations using ST_StartPoint and ST_EndPoint, the result is that they are slightly different.  However, when I convert the result to text by wrapping it like so:  ST_AsText(ST_StartPoint(geom)) and ST_AsText(ST_EndPoint(geom))  then the results are exactly the same.  Is it possible they are actually off by a tiny amount like .000000001 and the ST_AsText loses a decimal point? I have a dataset with a large number of Yes/No responses. Can I use principal components (PCA) or any other data reduction analyses (such as factor analysis) for this type of data? Please advise how I go about doing this using SPSS. I want to prove that: $\ln(x+1)&lt; x$.  My idea is to define:  $f(x) = \ln(x+1) - x$, so:  $f'(x) = \dfrac1{1+x} - 1  = \dfrac{-x}{1+x} &lt; 0, \text{ for }x &gt;0$.  Which leads to $f(x)&lt;f(0)$, so $\ln (x+1)-x&lt;0$.  Is that a valid proof? Any other ideas?  Thanks. Why do we use the object instead of the subject pronoun in constructions like "stupid me"? I'm trying to find out how come we say lucky me and stupid us rather than lucky I and stupid we. My understanding is that this is not a recent invention, but a relic from the distant past where it was a dative construction. However, I don't see the reason for using any case other than the nominative in this construction to begin with.        He went surfing. → Lucky him went surfing.   I got pulled over. → Stupid me got pulled over.   They bought a house. → Thoughtless them bought a house.      This is rather intriguing. After thinking about it for a while, I couldn't come up with any other language, Germanic or otherwise, where simply introducing an adjective would dictate a change of grammatical case. This appears to be an English peculiarity. How far can it be traced back? Can anyone comment on its background? highest power of prime $p$ dividing $\binom{m+n}{n}$ Installing "firmware-b43-installer" offline How can I install firmware-b43-installer driver if I can't connect to internet by wire? Confused About Trigonometric Substitution