I am having the hardest time finding something like this on Mouser. I have find things similar, without the screw for example, but never exactly this. Is there a generic name for this type of connector?  If you type something like PCB 2 Way Connector into Google then your search is through, but Mouser apparently has a different naming convention for these little connectors.   This is the closest thing I could find, but I either need a 4-way connector or a 2-way. Ideally I would like to find the same connectors as shown below.    Examples:
Here is a picture of two of them:    I searched for these connectors in  and  for an hour, but couldn't find anything similar. Can you please name these connectors for me and/or give a link to their subcategory in one of these part seller websites?
How to substantiate the claim that something is not known? I am writing a master's thesis (in Number Theory) and there are multiple places where I need to claim that something is not yet known. Since I am not an expert (and even if I were) I would like to reference some more authoritative source than myself or, say, Wikipedia.  For example, consider the following statement:     In 1980 Schmidt proved that [some property holds]. No other necessary or sufficient conditions are currently known, though.   For the first sentence I can cite Schmidt's original paper, but how can I substantiate the second claim? I have installed Linux Bash on Windows 10 (available from Microsoft), but I've forgotten my password.  I've searched for a solution but I only find suggestions that involve doing something before the system boots, like accessing recovery mode, but that will not work in this case as this Ubuntu is just an application within a Windows system and doesn't have its own boot process.  How can I reset my password? Please don't throw this one out as a duplicate of  I'm not asking about the plurality of the noun immediately following those two words - I'm interested in exactly why the example below is problematic (context: I have several children, one named John)...     1: One of my children's name is John.   I can't see any obvious reason why singular name there is completely unacceptable, but it certainly doesn't sit well with me. It seems to turn on whether one of my children can be treated collectively as the "subject" of the Saxon genitive 's, but I don't see a problem with...     2: It's actually one of my children's, but you can sleep in this bed.   I realise that in practice we'd normally pluralise names in the first example. But of course, this implies that one of attaches to my children's names, which isn't really the same construction.  So - is there some kind of "rule, principle" debarring #1 above? Or is it just "one of those things"?    (Apologies if my later switch from brothers to children invalidates any comments or answers.) Indecomposable limit ordinals A limit ordinal $\gamma&gt;0$ is said to be indecomposable iff $\nexists\alpha,\beta&lt;\gamma$ such that $\alpha+\beta=\gamma$.  In view of this definition, I’m trying to prove the equivalence of the following statements for limit ordinals $\gamma$:  (1) $\gamma$ is indecomposable.  (2) $\alpha+\gamma=\gamma$ $\forall\alpha&lt;\gamma$.  (3) $\gamma=\omega^\alpha$ for some $\alpha\in\mathrm{ON}$.  I’ve been able to get $(1)\implies(2)$ and $(3)\implies(1)$, but I have nothing more than scratch work for $(2)\implies(3)$.  Any suggestions would be appreciated. Are there any valid reasons to not rollover a former 401(k) when changing jobs?  I have several little ones that I never quite got around to rolling together - with an upcoming job change, should they all be combined into my new employer's retirement plan?  If not, what else might be considered? How assign shortcut to custom function? Analytic continuation of a power series 2 Another Qual question here,  For the function $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty z^{2^n}$$,  Prove the following:  i) $f$ converges to a function analytic in the open unit disk $D$,  ii) $f(z) =z+f(z^2)$ and  iii) $f(z)$ can not be analytically continued past any point on the unit circle.  I can even see (ii) very easily, but I can not see how can I prove rigorously (i) and  (iii). Help please. (In, On or At) GitHub? What's the difference between say:     "The project will be on GitHub",      "The project will be in GitHub" and      "The project will be at GitHub"? I'm building a quick csv from a mysql table with a query like:  select DATE(date),count(date) from table group by DATE(date) order by date asc;   and just dumping them to a file in perl over a:  while(my($date,$sum) = $sth-&gt;fetchrow) {     print CSV "$date,$sum\n" }   There are date gaps in the data, though:  | 2008-08-05 |           4 |  | 2008-08-07 |          23 |    I would like to pad the data to fill in the missing days with zero-count entries to end up with:  | 2008-08-05 |           4 |  | 2008-08-06 |           0 |  | 2008-08-07 |          23 |    I slapped together a really awkward (and almost certainly buggy) workaround with an array of days-per-month and some math, but there has to be something more straightforward either on the mysql or perl side.   Any genius ideas/slaps in the face for why me am being so dumb?    I ended up going with a stored procedure which generated a temp table for the date range in question for a couple of reasons:   I know the date range I'll be looking for every time The server in question unfortunately was not one that I can install perl modules on atm, and the state of it was decrepit enough that it didn't have anything remotely Date::-y installed   The perl Date/DateTime-iterating answers were also very good, I wish I could select multiple answers! Gosper's unusual formula connecting $e$ and $\pi$ How to check if a column exists in a SQL Server table? I need to add a specific column if it does not exist. I have something like the following, but it always returns false:  IF EXISTS(SELECT *           FROM   INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS           WHERE  TABLE_NAME = 'myTableName'                  AND COLUMN_NAME = 'myColumnName')    How can I check if a column exists in a table of the SQL Server database? Why did the quality of terminators increase from movies 1 to 3? I have seen only the first three movies, so I don't know whether the other movies/TV series deal with this question or not. My main point is that in the movies, the terminator that travels back furthest in time is of the worst quality, and the quality increases with the time travel (meaning they travelled from a later time). What is a good explanation for this?  Note: I am not interested in the obvious not-in-universe explanation that they wanted something better and bigger for each new movie. get_post_gallery with Gutenberg I have a site where I created a page that takes the gallery images from a post and puts them into a slider.   I used the following code:  // gets the gallery info $gallery = get_post_gallery( $post-&gt;ID, false ); // makes an array of image ids $ids = explode ( ",", $gallery['ids'] );   Then I inserted the images using wp_get_attachment_image().   Unfortunately, with WP 5.0 and Gutenberg, get_post_gallery no longer works with newly added content. It seems that get_post_gallery used a shortcode that no longer works with Gutenberg.   I am still getting up to speed on Gutenberg and the block system. Until I understand that all better, I was wondering if anyone has any advice on how to get the image ids from a gallery in Gutenberg? Create tar archive of a directory, except for hidden files? I'm wanting to create a tar archive of a specific directory (with its subdirectories of course). But when I do it, using the tar command, I get a list of files that were included, for example:     a calendar_final/._style.css      a calendar_final/style.css   As you can see, there are two versions of the same file. This goes for every file, and there are many. How do I exclude the temporary files, with the ._ prefix, from the tar archive? In a family with two children, what are the chances, if one of the children is a girl, that both children are girls? I have a question about MediaWiki formatting. Since this is similar to LaTeX questions, I figured it would have a nice, happy home on Stack Overflow. I'm not quite sure if it's programmer related enough though.  What does the community think? Specifying a no-indent for a list I have the following:  This is just normal text...  \begin{enumerate} \item First Item ?\\\\ This is the text of the first item \item Second Item ?\\\\ This is the text of the second item \end{enumerate}   Which renders the following:  This is just normal text...  1. First Item ?     This is the text of the first item  2. Second Item ?      This is the text of the second item   I want to specify that the text of the items has no indentation.  Basically, I want it to be rendered like such:  This is just normal text...  1. First Item ?  This is the text of the first item  2. Second Item ?   This is the text of the second item   How can I specify this form of no indentation? What is a "static" function in C? The question was about plain  functions, not  static methods, as clarified in comments.  I understand what a static variable is, but what is a static function?  And why is it that if I declare a function, let's say void print_matrix, in let's say a.c (WITHOUT a.h) and include "a.c" -  I get "print_matrix@@....) already defined in a.obj", BUT if I declare it as static void print_matrix then it compiles?  UPDATE Just to clear things up - I know that including .c is bad, as many of you pointed out. I just do it to temporarily clear space in main.c until I have a better idea of how to group all those functions into proper .h and .c files. Just a temporary, quick solution. Beamer: \nonumber equivalent for slides? Is there an equivalent command to \nonumber when one doesn't want to include certain slides in the numbering? I would like to leave outline and title slides out of my numbering, and instead just number slides with actual content. Other workarounds would be nice to know about as well.  Edit: Since a MWE example was requested, here is one. Suppose I have a title page and two other slides. The code below gives a slide counter that goes up to 3, and the title slide is slide 1. I would prefer to have the title slide not be numbered, the counter go up to 2, and the the numbering start at the slide after the title. Here is some code.  \documentclass{beamer}  \mode&lt;presentation&gt;  {    \usetheme{Dresden}  }   \setbeamertemplate  {footline}{\quad\hfill\insertframenumber/\inserttotalframenumber\strut\quad}    \begin{document}  \begin{frame}  \titlepage \end{frame}  \begin{frame} Some actual content here \end{frame}  \begin{frame} Some more actual content here \end{frame}  \end{document} Add the Same Modifier to Multiple Objects at Once?