I am having a strange issue where I could see well through camera in object mode, but when I am trying to render it, the result seems to be grainy color of the object but the actual object is not visible. The following is the view through camera:    after rendering the exact same frame.     Added the blender file. Yes, I have tried the camera settings and added additional lights into the scene, it is rendering on the final frames, but it is not rendering in the very first frame, the camera is set to follow a simple path.
I am having some issues when rendering an image, my rendering screen is turning into grey even when making a full render. What am I doing wrong?
I am running an analysis on the probability of loan default using logistic regression and random forests.    When I use logistic regression, the prediction is always all '1' (which means good loan).  I have never seen this before, and do not know where to start in terms of trying to sort out the issue.  There are 22 columns with 600K rows.  When I decrease the # of columns I get the same result with logistic regression.   Why could the logistic regression be so wrong?  **Actual from the data**  0 :   41932  1 :   573426  **Logistic regression output**   prediction for 1 when actually 0: 41932 prediction for 1 when actually 1:573426  A**s you can see, it always predicts a 1**   **Random forests does better:**  actual 0, pred 0 : 38800  actual 1, pred 0 : 27  actual 0, pred 1 : 3132 actual 1, pred 1 : 573399 Easier way to debug a Windows service What is the reasoning behind restricting the number of migration paths? On the religion and culture stackexchange sites, many, many users will initially ask a question in a place that's kind of off-topic there, but are fully on-board elsewhere.    Christianity.SE, for example, gets a lot of general philopsophical questions that would be better on Philosophy, historical questions that might be better on History.SE, and hermenutical questions that are better on BH.SE.  It is, however, unreasonable in my mind for a user with a question to be required to have domain expertise on which sub-site each has. Indeed, even amongst users with a high amount of knowledge, there can be disagreement.  Likewise, , but as just about every one of those is in beta, the user would have to be very saavy (or would have to find that post) in order to nail it every time.  That said, recommending that a question be moved is much harder than it needs to be.  I have seen business rule logic that says, for example,    migration paths only exist to graduated sites (ergo politics, money, history, and quantitative finance wouldn't qualify) migration paths seem to be limited to 5.   Anything not on a migration path requires a moderator (and not just a high rep user) to get involved.  So, what is the reasoning behind this?  Note, I'm not asking for a solution (although the obvious solution would be to allow migration paths to any established site, beta or not, i.e. a VTC as off topic b/c it belongs on another site should allow you to pick any other site) - I just want to understand the business purpose in restricting migration paths to a small, predefined number for everyone other than a mod. How to keep a constant baselineskip when using minipages (or \parboxes)? When a minipage is used to box a text paragraph, the first line of the minipaged text and the last line of the previous text paragraph are closer than two consecutive lines in a standard text paragraph; analogously, the last line of text inside the minipage and the first line of text after the minipage are also closer.  The following MWE illustrates this:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{lipsum}  \newcommand\Text{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut, placerat ac, adipiscing vitae, felis. Curabitur dictum gravida mauris. Nam arcu libero, nonummy eget, consectetuer id, vulputate a, magna.\textbullet}  \begin{document}  \Text  \noindent\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} \Text \end{minipage}  \Text  \end{document}   How can I guarantee a constant baseline-skip even if minipages (or \parboxes) are used? How to prevent click events on the document body (maybe a bug in Cordova?) Is it possible to create image data and save to a file from a script I'm currently trying to extract textures from a binary file, and ideally I'd like to save each texture to a file or embed in the .blend file. However, before saving an image, I need to be able to create an image in memory from an array of pixel data.  The PIL library contains the kinds of functions I need to use, but it is not included with Blender. Is there anything similar to PIL in Blender? bpy.ops.image seems to be close to what I need, but lacks necessary pixel set/manipulation functions. What book has criminals wear a ring? I remember reading one of my father's books when I was younger.  It was about a guy who ended up getting in trouble with the law and was required to wear a ring that could not be removed and would shock the wearer any time they committed a crime (No matter how minor.)    The book was probably published in the early to mid 80s.  I thought the name of the book was 'The Ring', but I am unable to locate anything.  The cover had a car with a single wheel driving on a metal I-beam. Notification that ‘someone might be watching what you browse’ I got a notification on my iPhone. The notification reads     Someone might be watching what you browse. Follow 3 steps to encrypt your web traffic and change your IP address.   What does this mean? Subtracting (erasing) polygons from polygon using ArcGIS for Desktop? I have two polygon layers, one is green that represents all non-public right-of-way land. I have another polygon that is just a circle with a specified radius.  I would like my output to be a polygon layer that represents all the white space (the gaps) in the private land polygon layer that is also within the black circle.    How does one do this (In ArcGIS 10.2)? English equivalent for the Persian proverb "The mountain just gave birth to a mouse" I'm looking for an idiom or expression to describe a well-known person/ organization/ politician/ government  whose achievements in a given situation are smaller than what they had claimed or promised to be.  We Iranians have a proverb that literally means      The (roaring) mountain just gave birth to a mouse!    Its  etymology is like this:  Once a volcanic mountain started roaring, hissing, and bursting bubbles. The people were waiting to see what would happen after all those huge roarings and loud booms. Finally, the volcano activity stopped and the people saw just a tiny mouse came out of there! (rather than a monster that was expected to come). So they said mockingly:     "Heh! After all those huge roarings, the (big) mountain just gave birth to a (tiny) mouse!"    Notes:   The (roaring) mountain -symbol for an apparently big(=important) and strong person-here is figured like a woman who is screaming and shouting while is delivering her baby. We use this proverb for mocking an important person/organization/ government, etc ironically when they have used broad advertisements or have spent much money or resources over doing something noticeable, but the result/ achievement is less noticeable than it was claimed or promised to be.   Is there any equivalent for this Persian proverb?  I just found ; would it convey the same connotation? Adverb-adjective compound premodifier with or without hyphen? Remarkably low condensation temperature  or  Remarkably-low condensation temperature?  The focus of remarkable is that it is such a low temperature. We are having an office disagreement and any help is much appreciated. Group cohomology is one thing I don't seem to get my head around.  I understand $H^0$ as being the "fixed points" but when it comes to anything higher I have no idea what the notions are meant to be capturing...if anything.  For example I can see that 1-cocycles are homomorphisms with a specific property but that property doesn't seem to mean anything to me...and I think it should!  Is there an intuition or example that explains the meaning or is it just something that "stuck" and seems to work in lots of places? Understanding the Basic Context of Trusted Hosts I got the trusted host settings error.      The trusted_host_patterns setting is not configured in settings.php. This can lead to security vulnerabilities. It is highly recommended that you configure this. See Protecting against HTTP HOST Header attacks for more information.    I read the  but I'm not understanding some of the basic context.   Are the "trusted hosts" me and other administrators who want to be able to administer the site remotely?  If so, would I add my PC's domain to the trusted host list? How do I change the `enumerate` list format to use letters instead of the default Arabic numerals? Bash File Unable to locate package when new line is added When building a bash file to execute I keep getting an error after adding a new line. I have tried moving some lines around or removing some of the packages but it will results in the same error. In the file if I was to remove 3 and 4 it there will no longer be an error.   E: Unable to locate package &lt;package&gt;   The bash file looks like this   #!/usr/bin/env bash sudo apt update &amp;&amp; sudo apt install -y python3-pip build-essential python3-dev python3-setuptools gcc sshpass sudo apt-get install apt-transport-https lsb-release software-properties-common dirmngr sudo apt-get update   The output with the error  Hit:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [88.7 kB]                                                   Hit:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease                                             Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates InRelease [88.7 kB]         Get:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-backports InRelease [74.6 kB]                                       Fetched 252 kB in 1s (189 kB/s)     Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done All packages are up to date. Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package sshpass Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package dirmngr Hit:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [88.7 kB]                                                   Hit:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease                                             Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates InRelease [88.7 kB]         Get:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-backports InRelease [74.6 kB]                                       Fetched 252 kB in 1s (209 kB/s)     Reading package lists... Done I haven't found a similar question on here, though I suspect the question may be rather well-covered.   I want to find a conformal map from the vertical strip $\{z:-1&lt;Re(z)&lt;1\}$ onto the unit disc.  Under the exponential map the region is taken to the annulus with radii $e$ and $e^{-1}$, but I'm not sure how useful this will be.  Can anyone advise on what the conformal map may be?  Thanks. The phrase for when: working in a group to divide responsibility and reduce malicious intent Variance of sample mean. Let $X_1, X_2, \ldots X_n$ be random variables with mean $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$. We define the sample mean $\bar{X} = \sum_{i = 1}^n X_i$.  I am having trouble understanding why the variance of $\bar{X}$ is $\sigma^2 / n$.  Here is what I worked out thus far:  $$\begin{gather} \sigma_\bar{X}^2 = E((\bar{X} - \mu)^2) = E(\bar{X}^2 - 2\bar{X}\mu + \mu^2) = E(\bar{X}^2) - 2\mu E(\bar{X}) + E(\mu^2) = E(\bar{X}^2) - \mu. \end{gather}$$  However, I'm not sure what to do with the $E(\bar{X}^2)$. Can I use a HDD on my PS3 if I have already used another on the same console? I'm thinking of changing the Hard Disk of my PS3 (Slim 120GB), but I am unsure of what will happen to the data on the one I previously had if I do this:   PS3 has some data in the HDD. I turn off PS3, change HDD, install OS on new HDD. I download some data on new HDD from PS Plus.   Let's imagine I forgot to back something up...   I turn PS3 off, change HDD back.   Can I still use the old hard drive without needing to format it again? This question was prompted by . Notoriously, if you calculate the Schwarzschild coordinate time for anything, matter or light, to reach the event horizon the result is infinite. This implies that the universe ages by an infinite time before someone falling into the black hole reaches the event horizon, so could that person see the universe age by an infinite time?  To be more precise, suppose the observer starts falling from rest at time $t = 0$ and some initial distance $r &gt; r_s$. If we wait for some time $T$ then shine a light ray at the falling observer. Will the light ray always reach the falling observer before they cross the event horizon? If not, what is the formula for the longest time $T$ that we can wait and still be sure the ray will catch the observer? If $T$ is not bounded it implies that observer could indeed see the end of the universe.  I can think of a qualitative argument for an upper limit on $T$, but I'm not sure how sound my argument is. The proper time for the observer to fall to the event horizon is finite - call this $\tau$. The proper time for the light ray to reach the horizon is zero, therefore the light ray will reach the observer before they cross the event horizon only if $T &lt; \tau$. Hence $T$ is bounded and the observer won't see the end of the universe.  I think a more rigorous approach would be to determine the equations of motion (in the Schwarzschild coordinates) for the falling observer and the light ray, and then find the condition for the light to reach the falling observer at some distance $\epsilon$ from the event horizon. Then take the limit as $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$. In principle this seems straightforward, but in practice the algebra rapidly defeated me. Even for a light ray the radial distance:time equation isn't closed form (Wolfram claims it needs the $W$ function) and for the falling observer the calculation is even harder.