Based on other similar questions, I've determined that a familiar can attune to magic items. But can a familiar cast spells from the Ring of Spell Storing? The description of Find Familiar states &quot;A familiar can't attack, but it can take other actions as normal.&quot; Does this mean if it could cast spells, it could only cast non-attacking spells?
Is it possible for a familiar to attune to and then wear or wield a magic item?
I would like to get a USB token to secure my keys. My use case is protection of 3 GnuPG keys that I will be using 10 times per day at least. I plan to create a new key ring from scratch. Because ECC seems more future-oriented than RSA, this is what I chose to use. I'm wondering which USB token to choose as well as which curve.  On  it is said that many people think curves recommended by the NIST or defined by Brainpool have a doubtful origin; therefore, they recommend the non-standardized Bernstein’s Curve 25519. On  one poster says that    He is not aware of any profound criticism of Brainpool curves, and Bernstein’s Curve 25519 is hard to protect against side-channel attacks when implemented in embedded devices.   As a result, I'm a bit lost as to which key/curve to choose. Is propagation of uncertainties linear? I'm in doubt with one thing: let's imagine that we have $n+1$ quantities, $n$ of them being directly measured, and the other one being related to the first $n$ by a function $f : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$. If the $x_i$ is one of the quantities being directly measured and if $\Delta x_i$ is it's uncertainty, then I've learned that the uncertainty of the quantity $y = f(x_1, \dots x_n)$ is given by:  $$\Delta y=\sum_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}\Delta x_i}$$  My problem in understanding this is: well, if $f$ is such a function, it's derivative is the linear transformation $df : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ given by:  $$df=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}dx_i$$  Where $dx_i : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ is given by $dx_i(a_1 \dots a_n) = a_i$. Hence, what we are saying, is that $\Delta y = df ( \Delta x_1, \dots \Delta x_n)$, in other words, we are saying that the uncertainty of $y$ is given by a linear function of the vector of uncertainties of the quantities $x_i$. Why should that be true? I mean, what's the reasoning behind this? I really didn't get the point, my teacher just gave the equation without justifying or anything like that.  Any help and reference is appreciated. Does a shortcode with a single attribute have to use an array? What is the difference between UNION and UNION ALL? What is the difference between UNION and UNION ALL? Cannot see my wifi [10ec:d723] when trying Ubuntu Splitting a PDF document in two without purchasing a PDF editing tool Acrobat Reader allow us to easily save a copy of the PDF document. How can I save only from page 5 to 10 without purchasing a PDF editing tool? How can I automatically log out the guest account after a period of inactivity? As part of a kiosk system, I have set up a Guest account on a Mac OS X Snow Leopard computer. This account is cleared every time someone logs off the computer. However, plenty of people don't. Is there any way that I can automatically log out this guest account after a period of inactivity?  I tried using the security preferences pane, but that just causes the confirm logout dialog to show up.  I have hacked around the /System/Library/User Templates/ folder, so I can set the screensaver, desktop background, &amp;c. If something like ScriptSaver can solve my problem, I will gladly use it. Stop Mathematica from giving imaginary solutions Please provide a mobile-optimized captcha page Mouse rotated 90 degrees Forcing a SimpleXML Object to a string, regardless of context Let's say I have some XML like this  &lt;channel&gt;   &lt;item&gt;     &lt;title&gt;This is title 1&lt;/title&gt;   &lt;/item&gt; &lt;/channel&gt;   The code below does what I want in that it outputs the title as a string  $xml = simplexml_load_string($xmlstring); echo $xml-&gt;channel-&gt;item-&gt;title;   Here's my problem.  The code below doesn't treat the title as a string in that context so I end up with a SimpleXML object in the array instead of a string.  $foo = array( $xml-&gt;channel-&gt;item-&gt;title );   I've been working around it like this  $foo = array( sprintf("%s",$xml-&gt;channel-&gt;item-&gt;title) );   but that seems ugly.  What's the best way to force a SimpleXML object to a string, regardless of context? What does % do to strings in Python? Where is .bashrc? 12 hours delay with ATmega16A I am trying to turn on a LED for 5sec every 12 hours. I tried:  #include &lt;mega16.h&gt; #include &lt;delay.h&gt;  void main(void) {     DDRC.0 = 1;     PORTC.0 = 0;      while(1)     {              unsigned long i;        unsigned long j;        PORTC.0=1;         for(i=1; i&lt;432; i++)        {              delay_ms(100);          }         PORTC.0 = 0;         for(j=1; j&lt;100; j++)        {            delay_ms(50);          }     } }   but the LED was on for about 2 hour every week. Should you pick a baby up everytime it cries? My husband and i have differing opinions on this. I don't believe in the term 'spoilt'. I would be very happy if my daughter was 'spoilt' in the sense that she expects to be treated with the highest possible respect and love and affection in all her relationships.   Also it would not bother me if she think she is special and unique (that's exactly what I want her to think). Mother's face is a mirror for the baby - through the mother's reactions and attention, the child learns that she is a lovable and valuable human being.   I spend all my time with my baby when she is awake. I play games with her, I smile, and laugh, and I never ever let her cry. I rush to pick her up immediately, even if it's the middle of the night, I force myself to get up, no matter how tired I am (I admit it's hard sometimes, and I do let her cry for 10-20 seconds sometimes, but never more). Introduction to proofs with a fair amount of hand-holding? I'm trying to boot Canonical's Azure 16.04 .vhd file in a VirtualBox VM and it hangs at "non blocking pool is initialized".  It works in Hyper-V, so it may only be a bug in virtual box (5.0.20). Is there a software in Ubuntu that can analyse the cross references (theorems, lemmas, equations, etc.) in a tex project? There are some software to analyse the cross references among codes (Java or C++). I used to use a software for code analysis under Windows many years before. But I can't remember the name. On linux, an example might be LXR Cross Referencer.   Is there a similar tool that can analyse the latex files to find out the cross references of theorems, lemmas, propositions and equations? Record Animation In BGE What is the main difference between StringBuffer and StringBuilder? Is there any performance issues when deciding on any one of these?