How to capture command line parameters for new processes? I'm trying to capture the video conversion parameters passed onto the codecs in  to learn how codecs pass streams onto other codecs. Is there a program that captures the command-line parameters/arguments of newly created processes, either system-wide or processes spawned under one process?
How do I find out command line arguments of a running program? I'm looking for a tool or method to find out what command line parameters have been passed to a program, for example when it was run by another program (launcher-application scenario).
Properties of $x_k=\frac{a_{k+1}-a_{k}}{a_{k+1}}$ where $\{a_n\}$ is unbounded, strictly increasing sequence of positive reals How did the Tesseract come to Earth from Asgard? Why do my lamps require an insane "strength" value of 1 million? recently, I was using mesh planes to emit some light, and they had a strength of 8.0.. this worked well now, I want to swap these out for area lamps (to improve performance) i've positioned these area lamps in the place of my emitter polygons i've scaled them such they have 1.0 transform scale, and in the lamp settings, I set the size to 1m across (to size-match the previous emitters) the problem is, the lamps require a crazy "strength" of at least 1 000 000 (one million!) to produce any reasonable amount of light... this seems bonkers! point lamps, area lamps, and the others, are all effected my scene is scaled using the Centimeters preset.. the foreground is only a meter a way, and the more distant background is more like 5 meters back i've paid special attention to the sizing and scaling of this scene, I can't figure out why the mesh emitters are working with a sane Strength of 8, and the lamps require something out of this world? something must not be right...     Edit: Remastered scene corrects scales, problem persists       i've remastered the scene so that all of the objects have a proper scale factor of 1.0 this should correct any sizing discrepancy/confusion my scene must be in centimeters preset, all my other work is in centimeters the area lamp size is now definitely 1m, as highlighted in the above screenshot (and it is not affected by the 1.0 transform scaling factor, also highlighted (I also verified the delta scale is also 1.0)) despite correcting the scaling of my scene, strength 1 000 000 is still required is blender simply not accounting for my scene's Unit Scale setting? The site description in the hero header is wrong for Meta sites The hero header contains the same description for the Main and Meta sites. Here's the one for MSO:           Meta Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. Join them; it only takes a minute:    This can easily confuse people who are new to the network, so I feel this should be changed to something Meta specific. Perhaps re-use the text from the sidebar, that has a good description:     This site is intended for bugs, features, and discussion of Stack Overflow and the software that powers it. You must have an account on Stack Overflow to participate. Accidentally hit "toggle full screen", How do I exit? I am not very familiar with databases and the theories behind how they work.  Is it any slower from a performance standpoint (inserting/updating/querying) to use Strings for Primary Keys than integers? Matrices - Conditions for $AB+BA=0$ The Problem Let $A$ be the matrix $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}a&amp;b\\c&amp;d\end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$, where no one of $a,b,c,d$ is $0$. Let $B$ be a $2\times 2$ matrix such that $AB+BA=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 0&amp;0\\ 0&amp;0 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$. Show that either   $a+d=0$, in which case the general solution for $B$ depends on 2 parameters, or $ad-bc=0$, in which case the general solution for $B$ depends on one parameter.   (this is question 22 of the last matrix exercise of Further Pure Mathematics by Bostock et al.)  Comments Writing $B=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} e&amp;f\\ g&amp;h \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ and multiplying out I get that    $(a+d)(f+g)+(b+c)(e+h)=0$ $ae+bg+cf+dh=0$   but I am unable to get the required restrictions on $a,b,c,d$. Is there a quick way of doing the problem that doesn't require manual computation? I thought of considering invertible and non-invertible cases but couldn't get anywhere. Help would be much appreciated. Unable to log in to Stack Exchange How do I read an entire file into a std::string in C++? Prove: $\gcd(a,b) = \gcd(a, b + at)$. Browsing the internet from the command line sudo apt upgrade error 18.04 (Broken Packages) How do I change "Show Applications" button on GNOME 3 dash? I'm using Ubuntu with GNOME desktop.   I was wondering how to change the "Show Applications" button icon on the dash? How can I use GDAL to batch define a projection? recursion-consecutive numbers what is the number of subsets of the set {k∈N|1≤k≤n} with no two consecutive numbers? The answer says: $$a_n=a_{n-1}+a_{n-2}$$ with the starting conditions: $$a_0=1, a_1=2$$1. why does $a_1=2$? $$$$ 2. How does this recursion was created, I understand that if $a_n$ mean all the places with no consecutive numbers so, $a_{n-1}$ come from the fact that after the first place all those places satisfy this condition, but why there is need to "look" at what happen after the two places? How can you describe someone who gives up too easily? A friend of mine said that he was a cynic. I had told him that he was giving up too easily. In this situation, the worst case outcome was rejection, which logically speaking, was equivalent to not trying in the first place.  I want to say, "No, you aren't cynical, you are X," or "No, you aren't a cynic, you are a(n) X."  The closest I can come up with is unmotivated or intimidated.  What word describes a person who gives up too easily? Blender 2.78 with Windows 10 lags when interacting with the UI Inequality involving the sup of a function and its first and second derivatives Between vs. Among - "Difference [between | among] one thing and other things." Consider the following two versions of a question:1   Version 1: What is the difference in meaning between "[to be] not invited" and similar negation forms?  Version 2: What is the difference in meaning among "[to be] not invited" and similar negated forms?    Personally, I think Version 1 might subtly suggest a Star Topology (see below) with the target sentence "[to be] not invited"at the center.  And Version 2 might subtly suggest a more free-form comparison like the Mesh or Fully Connected, with the target sentence simply "one among many":   Between approx equal "Star" and among approx equal "Fully Connected"?  Don't get me wrong: I do think this is quite subtle, not always applicable, and I don't think anyone would intuit such a "network topology" meaning without further explanation.   So the main question is, are both grammatically correct?  If yes, is there a semantic difference to choose one over another, perhaps as I suggested?  Or does the plurality aspect of between and among trump other semantic and stylistic issues?    1. In my question , another user provided a very helpful edit. However, the change of the word between to among prompted this question. Evaluate the sum $\sum_{k=1}^n {n \choose k-1} {n \choose k}$ Evaluate the summation of: $$ \sum_{k=1}^n {n \choose k-1} {n \choose k} $$ I have been trying to solve this problem by translating C(n, k-1) into C(n, k), because I know that: $$ \sum_{k=1}^n {n \choose k}^2={2n \choose n} $$ However, I haven't been having any luck. Am I on the right track? What am I doing wrong?