I just cleaned my sensor with a cloth and when i test the dirt, I saw different dark spots on the image. What should i do? I've tried blowing with blower, but it didn't help.
I know there have been a lot of posts on this topic, but I haven't found exactly what I am looking for.   I noticed some dust spots on my sensor for my D750 after I took a picture with some sky in it and then was playing around with "dehaze" in Lightroom. Okay no problem, I have owned the camera for a year probably time to clean the sensor.   So I do a bit of research online and land on the fact that I can do this myself. I also want to learn how so I don't need to spend $50 or $75 each time I need this done. I decide to buy .  What I do is close my aperture down to F22, put my ISO on 100 and then set my shutter speed to 2 seconds or so and take a picture of a well lit white piece of paper.   I then go into Lightroom and jack the dehaze and look for dust spots. I see a ton. Okay, so now let's clean it. I wet the swab with a few drops to get it just saturated on the top of the swab, apply some pressure, wipe left to right, turn it over, wipe right to left and done.   Then I took the same picture and although the dust spots are different, they are still there! What the heck? Okay maybe it just needs a good blow out. I took my  and blow out everything I can inside of there, then I do the same cleaning method as the first time, except this time I start with a dry swab, throw it out, then get a new swab, wet it and clean it again.  I take the picture again... and they are STILL THERE. Okay let's get out the high power flashlight. I wouldn't say I scrubbed it, but I went back and forth with the swab on what seemed to be a stubborn spot (I know, sketchy). Then I clean it again with a normal swab and take another picture.   This went on and on and I have basically ran out of swabs. I still see spots. I used the same swab a few times (I know, also sketchy) because I just couldn't figure out why it wasn't getting clean. I even tried a can of air (although some don't recommend that because they have solvent in them, but I was desperate and some people on youtube did it). That actually seemed to help, but in the end I still have spots.  So obviously a lot of you will tell me to just "take it in! you're going to break your sensor", but I really want to learn how to do this. And now I am just stubborn.  The spots are at the top and bottom of the frame mostly.  Any ideas? I ordered  today, and I was going to try it out very carefully. I also ordered .       EDIT: I tried the gel stick. It did seem to help, but on the second try something else got on the sensor so I am going to wait until tomorrow to get the swabs and then try to do a swab cleaning + the gel stick again... we will see.  EDIT2: Well it looks . I think the gel sticky stick helped but it's still not spotless. I ran over it one more time. I also included a photo above to the people are nervous about cleaning their own sensor. Obviously I can't guarantee you won't screw up, but I ran a swab over this sensor at least 15 times and it still shots great.
What is Peter Quill's status after Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2? What is the easiest way to duplicate an activerecord record? I want to make a copy of an ActiveRecord object, changing a single field in the process (in addition to the id).  What is the simplest way to accomplish this? I realize I could create a new record, and then iterate over each of the fields copying the data field-by-field - but I figured there must be an easier way to do this. Perhaps something like this:  new_record = Record.copy(:id) Find & Delete duplicated files on multiple harddisks at once Indexing redundantly named vector in R "...would have trouble imagining...": Is this present participle or gerund? Is $x^x=y$ solvable for $x$? Help with completing the proof: Any unbounded sequence is either infinitely large or has a convergent subsequential limit Given $\{x_n\}$ is an unbounded sequence, prove:   $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = \infty\ \  \text{or}\ \ \lim_{n_k \to \infty} = A $$   In other words any unbounded sequence either infinitely large or has a convergent subsequence.     Everything before udpate section is wrong.  Part 1. Proving $|x_n| &gt; M \implies \lim_{n\to\infty} x_n = \infty$  $\Box$ Start with the definition of an unbounded sequence: $$ \forall M &gt; 0 \in \Bbb R \ \exists N \in \Bbb N: \forall n &gt; N\implies |x_n| &gt; M $$  Suppose that: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n \ne \infty $$ That means: $$ \forall n\in\Bbb N\ \exists C &gt;0 \in\Bbb R : |x_n| &lt; C $$  Now taking $M^\prime = \max\{M, C\}$ we have that: $$ \begin{cases} \begin{align} \exists N \in \Bbb N : &amp;\forall n&gt;N \implies &amp;|x_n| &gt; M^\prime \\ &amp;\forall n \in \Bbb N: &amp;|x_n| &lt; M^\prime \end{align} \end{cases} $$  So we have arrived to a contradiction which means the assumption is wrong and: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = \infty $$ $\Box$     Part 2. It's not clear to me how to prove that if unboundedness does not imply infinity limit then it must imply the existence of a convergent subsequence.   Two questions is my mind:   Is part 1 correct?  How do I proceed with the second part?     I'm using the following definition. $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = +\infty \stackrel{\text{def}}{\iff} \forall \epsilon &gt; 0 \exists N \in \Bbb N :\forall n &gt; N \implies x_n &gt; \epsilon \\ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = -\infty \stackrel{\text{def}}{\iff} \forall \epsilon &gt; 0 \exists N \in \Bbb N :\forall n &gt; N \implies x_n &lt; -\epsilon \\ $$ A sequence is considered infinitely large when: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = \infty\ \ \text{when}\ \ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = + \infty \ \ \text{or} \ \ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = - \infty $$    Update.   Looks like i've messed up a lot of things. I will try once again. As shown in comments and answers the statement holds only in case: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty} |x_n| = \infty \iff \forall \epsilon &gt; 0 \exists N \in \Bbb N: \forall n &gt; N \implies |x_n| &gt; \epsilon $$  Consider the following: $$ \lnot P = \lnot\left(\lim_{n\to\infty}|x_n| = \infty \right) \iff \exists \epsilon &gt; 0\ \forall N_1 \in \Bbb N : \exists n &gt; N_1 \land |x_n| &lt; \epsilon $$  But on the other hand it is given that $x_n$ is unbounded: $$ Q = \forall M &gt; 0\ \exists N_2 \in \Bbb N : |x_{N_2}| &gt; M $$  Construct a negative expression for boundedness: $$ \lnot P = \exists M &gt; 0\ \forall N_2 \in \Bbb N : |x_{N_2}| &lt; M $$  If $S = \lnot P \implies \lnot Q$ then $S = P \lor \lnot Q$  Let $\epsilon = M$, choose $N = \max\{N_1, N_2\}$ then both statements are true and: $$ \exists \epsilon &gt; 0\ \forall N = \max\{N_1, N_2\}: \exists n &gt; N \land |x_n| &lt; \epsilon $$  Now either $P$ is true, which would mean $\lim |x_n| = \infty$, or $\lnot Q$ is true which would mean the sequence is bounded and hence contains a convergent subsequence. How big is "too big" for an airline seat? At what point will you be required to buy two tickets? As I said in another question, I'm bringing my parents to visit me here in Sweden next year.  My mother is around 280-300 pounds and 5'6" (130-135kg, 1.67m). I am concerned that she might be asked at the airport to buy a second seat. If it's likely I would rather just buy the second seat in advance, because I don't want her to be embarassed/humiliated by some random employee. As well, I won't be there, they will be travelling alone and aren't used to dealing with airports and they won't know what their rights are.  In terms of how it will affect other passengers, it's not important, she will get a window seat and my dad will sit in the middle seat, so I don't see it affecting anybody.   She insists it's fine, "the last time I flew I fit easily!" but that was 20 years ago when she was half the size.   They will be flying BA or SAS, definitely not Ryanair.  So - where is the cutoff? Is a 300 pound 5'6" woman going to be too big to fit in a single airline seat? Or am I worrying about nothing? Which is easier, pushing or pulling? It is generally assumed, from a person's perspective, that pushing a cart is more easier than pulling one. But why? Is there any difference in terms of force required to achieve the same amount of displacement?  Or is it merely human perception?  Why is it that almost all automobiles transfer torque to the back axle. But then, why do trains have engines in the front? Use of comma separating two adjectives Some Windows 10 UWP icons not displaying on search, or in settings prove that : $\cos x \cdot \cos(x-60^{\circ}) \cdot \cos(x+60^{\circ})= \frac14 \cos3x$ I should prove this trigonometric identity. I think I should get to this point : $\cos(3x) = 4\cos^3 x - 3\cos x $ But I don't have any idea how to do it (I tried solving $\cos(x+60^{\circ})\cos(x-60^{\circ})$ but I got nothing) I have a website that sells music artists posters. Each artists has a page containing a small bio, and a list of posters we are selling representing the artist.  Currently our HTML looks like that  &lt;h1&gt;{Artist name}&lt;/h1&gt; bio &lt;h2&gt;Posters&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;ul&gt;   &lt;li class="poster"&gt;...&lt;/li&gt;   ... &lt;/ul&gt;   We are redesigning this page, and we have a new template that we really like. Problem is that in this new version the &lt;h2&gt;Posters&lt;/h2&gt; does not appear anywhere on the page.  As you might expect, a significant part of our traffic comes from people typing something like : "{Artist name} poster" on Google.  I fear that, by removing the word "poster" from the page, we will reduce our chances of getting these people to come to the site, since Google might down rank us.  I see several options here :   Give Google a slightly altered page that contains the H2 tags. But I think this falls into the "Black Hat SEO" category. And I don't want that. Put the heading. Hide it with CSS. Everyone wins, including accessibility tools which can determine the structure of the page using the "invisible" heading. But I do not know if this is considered a good practice. Forget about the heading, and find other ways to tell Google that we really are about posters. (via keywords, but do they really have the same "weight" as an H2?) Adapt the design to our SEO need, and find a way to put that heading nicely.   Are there webmasters out there that have been facing the same issue, how did you resolve it? Today I downloaded Ubuntu for my laptop. It runs great from a bootable USB, but when I tried to install it, I got the following error message: The installer encountered an error copying files to the hard disk:  [Errno 5] Input/output error  This is often due to a faulty CD/DVD disk or drive, or a faulty hard    disk. It may help to clean the CD/DVD, to burn the CD/DVD at a lower   speed, to clean the CD/DVD drive lens (cleaning kits are often    available from electronics suppliers), to check whether the hard disk   is old and in need of replacement, or to move the system to a cooler   environment.     I tried everything to install it on my laptop including redownloading the Ubuntu ISO image, but nothing worked. Steam Bollywood Achievement:     As Gandhi, win a cultural victory with   3 or fewer cities in your empire.   I wish to do this achievement on a Pangaea Standard map size or larger and on Prince difficulty or higher,  What tactics do people recommend to achieve this. Any tips on the use of, Social Policies, Wonders, Diplomacy, City States and Military. Ubuntu n00b here.  I have created several disasters of the first order already.  I am getting ready to try to install opera - it is a very long and arduous process.  I am afraid - no - I am absolutely certain that I will damage something important.  How do I create a system restore point?  Does such a thing exist? If an polynomial has a complex root, is it necessary that its conjugate is also a root? If an polynomial has a complex root, is it necessary that the conjugate of that root is also a root of the polynomial? I am not sure about this. Please comment on this. How to reinstall many removed packages at once? I used sudo apt-get remove python command and accidently removed a bunch of packages that were required. I logged in via command line and installed ubuntu-desktop again but there are other packages that are missing, and I'm looking for a way to easily reinstall those removed packages. Since there's the log at software-center I wanted to ask what the easiest way might be to roll back changes or extract the removed packages list from the software center...  note: I typed sudo apt-get install .... .... ... ... for about two dozen of those removed programs in that list, but when I pressed enter it didn't install any of them because some package names couldn't be found.  The programs were removed at the same date. Which answer do I accept if I have multiple correct answers? Feedback Request: New Timeline Question View There is an experimental timeline view for questions now available on meta ONLY! (Now working on SO, SF, and SU as well)  This is partially motivated by comments about how difficult it is to follow very active questions which have a lot of activity, and also the feedback on the API which was heavily dominated by "we need to know what happened in this time range" type responses.  It can only be accessed through URL hackery at the moment. To get to it, enter question URLs like so:  https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/{id}/timeline  This is a chronological timeline of everything that happened on a question, including   initial question ask answers  revisions comments closure, deletion, reopen, undelete, etc votes   all based on when they happened in chronological order.  We are thinking about making this a fourth tab on the question, like so:  Timeline | Oldest | Newest | Votes  Please try it out and provide feedback. It is still a little rough, so we are not looking for highly detailed bug reports, just more general feedback.  Timeline view for this question: