I'm making a table in which I have to copy few lines from pdf to a table. I'm using LibreOffice calc for table making purpose. Problem is that even though I am copying simple text from the pdf, when I paste it to LibreOffice, Import Option keeps on poping up(randomly-sometimes it pop up sometime it does't). And due to this pasted text's font size also very small. Desired result is that when I paste the text in the cell, it just got pasted in the cell, without any time wasting popup which also disturbs the font size. Same question is asked here but no solution.
I tried Libreoffice, but its Import option while pasting in the cell is very  annoying.I also tried Gnumeric but I am not able to paste using middle button.Parcellite to make copy paste faster and middle button pasting is not working with Gnumeric. Is there any simple table maker app available that can accept only simple unformatted text? All these software are very complicated for this simple work.
I know several questions were asked about the difference between "going to" and "will". Based on several answers (see, for instance, ,  and ), I understood that "will" is more spontaneous and "going to" is used with more planned actions.  So, it seems that everything is pretty fine. However, in , Kosmonaut has an answer in which he states: "Let's say that tomorrow you will walk your dog from 7 - 8 AM".  On the one hand, you probably planned to walk your dog long before and thus I should use "Let's say that tomorrow you're going to walk your dog from 7 - 8 am".   On the other hand, since I'm saying "let's say...", I'm deciding right now (thus, unplanned) that you will walk your dog. So, even though in this hypothetical situation you made a plan, I'm in a more spontaneous mood deciding right now that that's what you will do tomorrow, and, thus, I should use "will".  Which one (if any) of the above explanations is right? I have a couple of questions about light here, and sorry of they are silly..  So since anything that goes beyond the event horizon can't go out, so what if a light beam was pointed somewhere behind the event horizon to the outside, would light have a slower speed then get sucked back? and what if the light particles were somehow exactly on the event horizon, would the light stand still?  And why can't light stand still? why does it always move at that really high speed? I usually compress my tex PDFs with ghostscript:  pdflatex -shell-escape file.tex  gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite        \    -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4   \    -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress      \    -dNOPAUSE -dQUIET -dBATCH      \    -sOutputFile=file_compressed.pdf \     file.pdf   Normally that works well, but if I have relative links to local files, the links don't work afterwards.  Minimal example:  \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage{hyperref}  \begin{document}     \begin{frame}         \href{run:./audio.mp3}{test}     \end{frame} \end{document}   The link works in file.pdf but not in file_compressed.pdf. Is there any pdflatex or ghostscript setting that retains the link in the compressed version?  I use Acrobate Reader 10.1.14 for viewing, Ghostscript 9.10 and pdfTeX 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.15 (TeX Live 2014) on OS X 10.9.5.    Update: The breakage of hyperlinks had nothing to do with compressing the PDFs. The breakage happened for all re-processing of PDFs containing hyperlinks in its input PDF. After seeking clarification about linear model coefficients  I have a follow up question concerning non-signficant (high p value) for coefficients of factor levels.  Example: If my linear model includes a factor with 10 levels, and only 3 of those levels have significant p values associated with them, when using the model to predict Y can I choose to not include the coefficient term if the subject falls in one of the non-signficant level?  More drastically, would it be wrong to lump the 7 non-significant levels into one level and re-analyze? Find the maximum value of $ f(x) = \int^{x}_{0} \sqrt{(x^2-x)^2+y^4}~dy$ Wireless antenna does not appear despite its driver being installed 1st example:  \starttypescript [\s!serif] [paratype]   \definefontsynonym [ParatypeSerif-Regular] [\s!name:PTSerif-Regular] [\s!features=\s!default]   \definefontsynonym [ParatypeSerif-Italic] [\s!name:PTSerif-Italic] [\s!features=\s!default]   \definefontsynonym [ParatypeSerif-Bold] [\s!name:PTSerif-Bold] [\s!features=\s!default]   \definefontsynonym [ParatypeSerif-BoldItalic] [\s!name:PTSerif-BoldItalic] [\s!features=\s!default] \stoptypescript   2nd example:  \definefont[SerifS][\s!file:GenBkBasR at \smallfontsize]   Is \s! only related to fonts? Should I use it in my typescript files? Essentially as the title suggests - in some commutative ring $K$ (with 0,1), if we have 2 distinct proper prime ideals $\mathfrak{p}_1 \neq \mathfrak{p}_2$, is it necessarily the case (or if not, when is it the case?) that $\mathfrak{p}_1 + \mathfrak{p}_2 = K$ ?  I ask because I'm working through some lecture notes which frequently take some $K$ complete with respect to a discrete valuation, a prime ideal in a valuation ring  $\mathfrak{p} \subset \mathcal{O}_K$, a finite extension $L/K$, and then use the fact $\mathfrak{p}\mathcal{O}_L$ factors uniquely as some $\mathcal{P}_1^{a_1} \ldots \mathcal{P}_r^{a_r}$ (where $\mathcal{O}_L$ is the integral closure of $\mathcal{O}_K$ in $L$). Then we say $\mathcal{P}_i + \mathcal{P}_j = \mathcal{O}_L$ $(\forall$ $ i \neq j)$.   However it isn't clear to me, because we've made so many different assumptions along the way, what the reason is that $\mathcal{P}_i + \mathcal{P}_j = \mathcal{O}_L$. Is it because these primes occur in the factorisation of $\mathfrak{p}$, is it because of some property of Dedekind domains or fields, or is it not really possible to say out of context? Many thanks, and if anything needs clarification please ask. Shower at Heathrow during layover in Terminal 5 Reading the  questions here, I am not too hopeful, but this is the perfect site to find the answer if it does exist:  Facts:   I arrive at T5 (British Airways) at 08:30, depart at 11:40 from T5 (British Airways) to another country. No time once I reach final destination to shower, Leave straight from work to catch the first leg. US citizen + passport, only final destination visa (currently)   Desire:  I want to shower - 10 mins is plenty.  Assume money is no object (pay for lounge access, cabs etc), but I'd rather not buy full ticket if I can avoid it.  P.S. It's a wedding, so I REALLY want to shower before haha.  EDIT: My plan so far (which doesn't work because it's after Security):   Travel from  Use    UPDATE:  I followed G &amp; Doc's advice and walked over to the Sofitel Hotel (Immigration + walk ~20-25 min total) showered there for £25 and walked back through Security with plenty of time to spare.  Thank you all for your help! Partial sum of rows of Pascal's triangle I'm interested in finding   $$\sum_{k=0}^m \binom{n}{k}, \quad  m&lt;n$$  which form rows of Pascal's triangle. Surely $\sum\limits_{k=0}^n \binom{k}{m}$ using addition formula, but the one above involves hypergeometric functions and I don't know how to approach it.  EDIT: if possible, please don't solve it, just a few hints will do. $A \in M_3(\mathbb Z)$ be such that $\det(A)=1$ ; then what is the maximum possible number of entries of $A$ that are even ? Let $A \in M_3(\mathbb Z)$ be such that $\det(A)=1$ ; then what is the maximum possible number of entries of $A$ that are even ? PHP & MySQL: mysqli_num_rows() expects parameter 1 to be mysqli_result, boolean given Why aren't my turtles breeding? I know there's some JAVA_OPTS to set to remotely debug a Java program.  What are they and what do they mean ? Is it acceptable to use "is become" instead of "has become"? In the King James version of the Bible there is a verse like this:     The Lord is my strength, and my fortress, and my song. And He is become my salvation.   Is it still feasible to use "is become" instead of "has become" and what is the semantic difference? Better way of saying "those who are curious"? I am writing a note in which I want to ask (curious) readers to refer another paper. The phrase curious minded comes to mind, but it seems somewhat awkward.  Is there a better way to convey similar import? SciFi movie (or miniseries) of the afterlife I am trying to find the name of a direct to TV movie, possibly a 2-3 part miniseries which I believe aired on the SciFi channel in the 90s. I don't remember who starred in it, but the movie opened with an astronaut attempting reentry whose shuttle ends up exploding. He awakes in a large bubble of air in a river and after reaching the surface and swimming to shore, meets several other people, from seemingly many different times throughout history (including one alien, who died on Earth).  Over the course of the movie, we learn the world is the afterlife, where everyone goes when they die. The major plot involves launching a steamboat (built by Mark Twain, no less) to travel up a river to the mountains, where the beings responsible for bringing everyone to this world are.  Does anyone know what the title of this movie/miniseries is? Methods to work around the problem of missing data in machine learning Virtually any database we want to make predictions using machine learning algorithms will find missing values ​​for some of the characteristics.  There are several approaches to address this problem, to exclude lines that have missing values ​​until they fill with the mean values ​​of the characteristics.  I would like to use for a somewhat more robust approach, which would basically run a regression (or another method) where the dependent variable (Y) would be each of the columns that have missing values ​​but only with the rows of the table that contain all the data , and predict the missing values ​​with this method, complete the table by the table and move to the next 'column' with missing values ​​and repeat the method until everything is filled.  But that gives me some doubts.  Why any column start? I believe that the one with the smallest missing values ​​until the one with the most  Is there any threshold of missing values ​​that is not worth trying to complete it? (for example, if this characteristic only has 10% of the values ​​filled would not it be more interesting to exclude it)  Is there any kind of implementation in traditional packages or other methods that are robust to missings? Is there a way to offset an edge? (extrude edge loop perpendicular to each edge) I recently figured out how to do it with faces, but with edges, I can't seem to get it to work. I have a complex flat plane and i need to extend an edge loop. I tried setting to individual origins in combination with all possibilities for x,y,z axes in global and local, but it is still not extruding along the normals.   actual problem   simplified I noticed the other day when serving the public that when asking for something, people were saying "Can I get an xyz, please". The previous time I had such a job it was "Could I have an xyz", or "May I have..." if they were being very polite.  Does anyone know when this trend started and what caused it?