I have an 10 year old camera (Canon 400D) and primarily use a fixed Canon 1.8 50mm lens. This weekend I was using it and noticed most of my photos with that lens looking blurry and unfocused. Over this weekend I also used other lenses (Canon 10-18mm) and the photos shot with them look sharp.   I've had a growing suspicion something is wrong with the 50mm AF as lately, the focus have felt "thrown off" despite me taking care to focus at the right object (I almost always use the centre point). It hasn't been as disastrous as this weekend though. I've had this lens for 5+ years, and I've taken great, sharp photos in the past so I don't think it's all in my head.   However, some photos from this weekend are still sharp.   Can someone help me out - although I'm enthusiastic about photography, I'm not an expert of how the lens and camera work "under the hood". Is it common that a lens will lose its AF capabilities over time?   (I'd rather not post the photos I took, as they have people in them and I value their privacy)
Probably a novice question, but how do I correctly diagnose from a photo for what reason that camera wasn't able to focus properly?  It can be any 1 of the following   Unsteady hand Lens issue Metering Re-Calibration required in camera or ...   Is there a set of unsaid protocols that needs to be followed by a photographer?  Goal is to get a sharp and crisp image prior to editing.  [PS: I own a Nikon D5200.]
I'm trying to downgrade my iPhone from the current iOS to an older one, as per .  But every time I try, I always receive this error:     The iPhone could not be restored. This device isn't eligible for the requested build.     I have tried many times with and without DFU mode. Any ideas regarding this? Previous posts                  As of today, the Moderator Flag Dashboard is officially graduated and the old version sent to the smelter's yard.  Based on stats from the past month, virtually all moderators were already on the new UI (thank you) so you hopefully won't notice any change.  That said, I would like to highlight the handful of improvements we made over the last month and a half based on your feedback:   A more responsive navigation bar at the top of moderator pages, improving the mobile experience. Similarly, , increasing room on the screen for the first question. . .  Not only do the headers look better, they now function better.  Now you scroll to and highlight the post/comment each time you click the link, not just the first time. .  Posts by the same user are grouped together and ordered newest first. .  We eliminated the VLQ (auto) side effect so now "Resolve all flags (auto)" doesn't do anything surprising.  If you still want to leave a comment or decline, you can do so with the buttons next to the individual flags.   Bugs and Feature Requests  Since this project is officially launched, all bugs and feature requests should be done in the form of questions tagged  on MSE, not answers on this post.  Feel free to post an answer here if you have specific concerns about the release process. Prove that for any infinite poset there is an infinite subset which is either linearly ordered or antichain. Is there anyway to remove denied permissions from a group for a folder if I dont have access? Initializing C# auto-properties I'm used to writing classes like this:  public class foo {   private string mBar = "bar";   public string Bar {     get { return mBar; }     set { mBar = value; }   }   //... other methods, no constructor ... }   Converting Bar to an auto-property seems convenient and concise, but how can I retain the initialization without adding a constructor and putting the initialization in there?  public class foo2theRevengeOfFoo {   //private string mBar = "bar";   public string Bar { get; set; }   //... other methods, no constructor ...   //behavior has changed. }   You could see that adding a constructor isn't inline with the effort savings I'm supposed to be getting from auto-properties.  Something like this would make more sense to me:  public string Bar { get; set; } = "bar"; Alternative ways to say "if and only if"? There are some scenarios about which I would like to get some confirmation:   when defining a concept A,      We call A, if ... [definition of   concept A]   Does "if" here mean equivalence instead of just sufficiency? Is it incorrect to replace "if" with "if and only if"?    For precisely what condition is    B satisfied?   Does "precisely" mean asking for necessary and sufficient condition for B? Some other ways to say "if and only if" / "necessary and sufficient"?   Some references that summarize some standard terminologies in Mathematics  such as this one?  Thanks and regards! Natural Sounding Text to Speech? I am looking for some easy to install text to speech software for Ubuntu that sounds natural. I've installed Festival, Gespeaker, etc., but nothing sounds very natural. All very synthetic and hard to understand.  Any recommendations out there? Yesterday, one of our computers dropped to grub shell or honestly, I am unsure what shell it was when we turned on the machine.  It showed that it can't mount the root filesystem or something in this sense, because of inconsistencies.  I ran, I believe:  fsck -fy /dev/sda2   Rebooted and the problem was gone.  Here comes the question part:  I already have in her root's crontab:   @reboot /home/ruzena/Development/bash/fs-check.sh    while the script contains:  #!/bin/bash touch /forcefsck   Thinking about it, I don't know, why I created script file for such a short command, but anyways...  Further, in the file:  /etc/default/rcS   I have defined:   FSCKFIX=yes    So I don't get it. How could the situation even arise?    What should I do to force the root filesystem check (and optionally a fix) at boot?  Or are these two things the maximum, that I can do?  OS: Linux Mint 18.x Cinnamon 64-bit.  fstab:  cat /etc/fstab | grep ext4   shows:   UUID=a121371e-eb12-43a0-a5ae-11af58ad09f4    /    ext4    errors=remount-ro    0    1    grub:   fsck.mode=force    was already added to the grub configuration. Delete Duplicate Rows? I have a column in an Excel spreadsheet with several hundred entries, and some of these entries are duplicated.  I would like to remove all duplicate entries from the column so that each entry remaining is unique.   Is there a way to accomplish this automatically? I'm having problems with an exercise from Apostol's Introduction to Analytic Number Theory.     Given $x$ and $y$, let $m=ax+by$, $n=cx+dy$, where $ad-bc= \pm 1$. Prove that $(m,n)=(x,y)$.   I've tried to give a proof, but I suspect it's wrong (or at least not very good). I would be very thankful for any hints/help/advice!  My proof:     We observe that since $ad-bc= \pm 1$, $ad=bc \pm 1$, and $(ad,bc)=1$.   Now, $(a,b) \mid m$ and $(c,d) \mid n$ but      $$(a,b) = ((d,1)a,(c,1)b)=(ad,a,bc,b)=(ad,bc,a,b)=((ad,bc),a,b)=(1,a,b)=1.$$      Similarly, we determine $(c,d)=1$. So, $1=(a,b) \mid m$ and $1=(c,d) &gt; \mid n$. But $(x,y)$ also divide $m$ and $n$. Since $(x,y) \geq (a,b)=(c,d)=1$, this implies that $(x,y)=m,n$. Hence   $(m,n)=((x,y),(x,y))=(x,y)$. How can I ensure testNG test method does not abort if any assert fails I know there is a difference between assert and verify in Junit; the assert results in a runtime exception, causing test method execution to abort. To overcome this problem, we can have verify which will make test case fail, but allowing test execution to proceed rather than getting aborted.  I doubt there is any such built in approach in testNG. I do understand that best practices say, there should not be multiple asserts in same test case.  But, in practical world, we do come across scenarios where we need to have multiple checkpoints in one test case and we don't want our test method to abort because of one check point failure (test execution should proceed despite failure).  How can we use a soft assert mechanism, similar to verify, which will not abort test method when there is a checkpoint failure.  Example:  @Test(dataProvider = "getMailUrl") public void testMail(email,subject); Assert.assertFalse(subject.isEmpty);//1st checkpoint Assert.assertNotNull(email); //2nd checkpoint Assert.assertEquals(email, "feedback@yoursite.com"); //3rd checkpoint   Now, I want test execution to proceed, even if the 1st checkpoint (validation of subject being not empty) fails. Definitely we will be not be using assert (hard assert). We will need concept of soft assert similar to verify (facilitated by Junit).   I understand, we have to build a customListener implementing TestNG interfaces or extending existing listeners such as TestListenerAdapter. I am still struggling - how can we do this? The following are two methods of building a link that has the sole purpose of running JavaScript code. Which is better, in terms of functionality, page load speed, validation purposes, etc.?    function myJsFunc() {     alert("myJsFunc"); } &lt;a href="#" onclick="myJsFunc();"&gt;Run JavaScript Code&lt;/a&gt;     or    function myJsFunc() {     alert("myJsFunc"); }  &lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="myJsFunc();"&gt;Run JavaScript Code&lt;/a&gt; How can I capture the movement of a bullet? Just beginning with photography.    Consider this image:     (This photo was taken by Harold "Doc" Edgerton in 1964 using his Rapatronic camera.)  I am looking for a  camera that can capture such an image. I am not looking for more fps. less fps is fine, but it must be able to capture such an instance.   What features should I look in such a camera?  How fast should be the shutter speed? What other things I should look for? Can we clarify to the OP that their question is not yet closed and the duplicates are only suggestions? I keep seeing custom flags in the queue from question askers who are incredibly irritated because there is a big, prominent box at the top of their question. It's just a list of other questions which may have the answer they desire, and is only even displayed to them because the question is not closed yet.  This question may already have an answer here: [list]  But to an ordinary user, it is not at all clear that the box is only shown to them, or that it will go away on its own if their question never actually gets closed. Could the text for this notice be altered to make it more clear that:  They are just suggestions for the person to view. Potentially if they agree with one, they should vote to close their own question as a duplicate of it.  Their question is not closed yet. If they disagree with the duplicates suggested, they should clarify their question and explain why it's not a duplicate.   I was thinking of an altered wording such as:  You might be able to find an answer to your question here: [list] If those answers do not fully address your question, please [edit your question] to clarify your exact problem.  I went with a more direct wording for the bolded title. Since the notice is only displayed to the asker, it makes more sense to talk directly to them in the message rather than making it feel like it's supposed to be addressing the entire audience of the site. Emphasize that only that person is seeing it by talking to them. It would also be helpful to append a &quot;More info&quot; link at the end of the message that links them to some further documentation about duplicates, and explains how the notice works - particularly that it will go away eventually or change to a proper duplicate notice if the question does get closed. What does the following for loop syntax mean in C? Is it possible to redirect connections to a specific IP/port to an external IP/port?  Example:   Server A has the external IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Server B has the external IP yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy User sends a request to server A on port 2106, I want to redirect it to server B at port 2106. How do I check the status of the CMOS battery? What is the remainder of $\,3^{3^{3^{\:\!\phantom{}^{.^{.^.}}}}}\!\!\!$ divided by $46$?  The level of powers is $2020$.  First there is no parenthesis so it means 3 power of 3 which is also power 3 and so on 2020 times  Second I think that we can use Fermat's Little Theorem but I don't know how, and maybe there is a better way. Finder search doesn't work properly after Yosemite update Ever since I upgraded to Yosemite, search no longer works properly in Finder. Spotlight works fine but Finder search just gives me a blank window with a spinning ball.  I've tried reindexing and I've also tried deleting Spotlight's .plist file. I restart my MacBook Pro after doing either. Finder search will work for one or two queries and stop again. I don't know what else I can do. Someone asked a very similar question in regards to window recovery for windows xp:   I'm using windows 8 (or 8.1 now). I run Dual Monitors. On Monitor 2 I sometimes have the input switched to something else other than the windows display (Mac or PS3). If there was a program that was displaying on Window #2 that does not have 'move' where I could potentially alt-space-m arrow keys. Is there another way to get that program to display on Window #1?  I tried right click on the program and doesn't seem to be anything there. I tried Windows Key and Arrows. I Tried right click toolbar and cascade.  I'm hoping this is a DUP or Softball question because this annoys the crap out of me.  Thanks!!