I saw in  the following identity: $$\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{(-1)^k}{2k+1}{n\choose k}=\frac{4^n}{(2n+1){2n\choose n}}$$ I have a  on an integral quite closely related to this identity, but I still do not know how to derive/prove the identity. I'm really not that good at combinatorics or evaluating series, so I don't know how to start, which is why I don't have any attempts to show you. Please explain your steps thoroughly. Edit: I know there other posts on this series, but I did not get from them the proof I was satisfied by.
I want to justificate following equation:  $$\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n-k)!}\frac{1}{2k+1} = \frac{2^n}{(2n+1)!!}$$  I calculated the both sides for $n$ from 1 to 10 and it was true. How the mathematical induction can be applied to this equation? Or is there other way to justificate it?
different font while using url I'm having troubles while using the url command in my bibliography.  I mean:  1) \bibitem{[8]} {\url{http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/13246989/Web20Application20Security20Statistics\#Tableofcontent}}  2) \bibitem{[5]} Justin~Clarke ``SQL Injection Attacks and Defense'', Syngress Publishing, Inc.2009   Unfortunately font 1) is different from 2).  What should I do in oder to get the same font for both items?   I'd like the font used in 1)  to be identical to the one displayed in 2) Is it possible to view the scene in the viewport camera view at 1:1? $f(x)f(1/x)=f(x)+f(1/x)$ Find a function $f(x)$ such that:  $$f(x)f(1/x)=f(x)+f(1/x)$$  with $f(4)=65$.  I have tried to let $f(x)$ be a general polynomial: $$a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+\ldots a_nx^n$$  which leaves $f(1/x)$ as:  $$a_0+a_1{1\over x}+a_2{1\over x^2}+\ldots + a_n{1\over x^n}$$  On comparing the coefficients of both sides, we see that:  $$2a_0=(a_0)^2+(a_1)^2+(a_2)^2+\ldots+(a_n)^2$$  And  $$a_1=(a_0a_1)+(a_1a_2)+ \ldots +(a_{n-1}a_n)$$  I don't know how to proceed further. I know I need to compare coefficients and come to a conclusion based on their values, but I don't see what to do next. Real Analysis: Continuity of a Composition Function Suppose $f$ and $g$ are functions such that $g$ is continuous at $a$, and $f$ is continuous at $g(a)$. Show the composition $f(g(x))$ is continuous at $a$.  My idea: Can I go straight from definition and take $\delta=\min\{\delta_1,\delta_2\}$, where $\delta_1$ is used for the continuity of $g$ at $a$ and $\delta_2$ is used for f being continuous at $g(a)$. In my proof I just treat $g(a)$ as a point when referring to the composition. So it goes like this:  Proof: Given $\epsilon&gt;0$, take $\delta=\min\{\delta_1,\delta_2\}$. Then $0&lt;|x-g(a)|&lt;\delta$ which implies $|f(g(x))-f(g(a))|&lt;\epsilon$. Questions like looking for css templates, blog templates, icons ... In general, resources (let's leave the licensing terms aside for now) which you might need when building a project of your own. Where should those questions go?  They're definitely not on-topic on Stack', SuperUser maybe although I doubt it. Webapps? Hmm, probably not.  Is there a place where they would be on-topic on the SE network? Restore deleted photos Just ran the latest batch of updates on 20.04 (Xubuntu), and now I'm getting a GRUB error: symbol 'grub_calloc' not found  I'm dropped into the 'grub rescue' shell, but have no idea what to do there that might be useful. To me, 'symbol not found' implies some sort of build error with the grub package, but I don't really know how grub works. I noticed that this update also included 'firmware', not sure if that could be related. Is my best bet just to boot from a live CD and see if I can roll back the update to grub somehow? Edited to add: OK, thanks to lots of people ! Here's what I think I now understand.  On 'non-UEFI' systems, grub is installed in two separate parts. The first, most basic, part is the part that is started on bootup. But for most of it's functionality, it needs the second part. These parts must be aligned - neither part must require any functionality from the other part which is not actually there. The visible, run-time problem occurs when these parts are not aligned, and the function grub_calloc is not supplied. It's not 100% clear to me if grub_calloc belongs in the second, larger part or the first. I would have expected the second, but the grub build system is a work of considerable art, so I don't know :).  The root cause of the problem is that the grub update has not ensured that both parts have been updated. Ideally, failure to do this should cause grub installation to fail, and the system should be reverted to a safe state. This does not happen. This is actually still a bit of a mystery to me. All that the update needs to do by default is put each part where the current parts are, because obviously that worked. If the install locations/drives are configuration - driven, and one of these locations can't be reached, then somehow a mismatch has arisen between that configuration data and reality. This might not show up as a problem as long as no new dependency was introduced between the parts.   All flavours of solution involve reinstalling grub to ensure that the two parts are aligned. It's not actually necessary to go back to the previous version ( although that will work ), because it's not the grub runtime per se that is broken. There are numerous ways to achieve this, depending on your environment, but running the Boot-repair live disk worked for me. It may be useful, for the purpose of avoiding such a misalignment in future, to ensure that the grub installer on your system is configured to install to the correct devices. This update resolves some important bugs (). If you have reverted grub to resolve this problem, be aware that you are exposed to these issues. Combinatorial proof for Stirling number of 1st kind's generating function So I see this identity a lot but I can't find a detailed combinatorial proof for it.  $$n(n+1)...(n+k-1)=\sum_{j=0}^k \begin{bmatrix}k \\j \end{bmatrix}n^j$$ Can someone please help? biblatex and autonum don't work together biblatex and autonum don't seem to work together in the newest version. Consider the following MWE:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex} \usepackage{autonum}  \begin{document}  \end{document}   I get the following error messages:  0 File ended while scanning use of \ettl@for@do1 0 pdflatex: \pdfmatch: repetition-operator operand invalid pdfTeX warning: pdflatex: \pdfmatch: repetition-operator operand invalid)Runaway argument?{{\blx@bibdata@i {\blx@tempb }}\blx@bibfiles \eappto \blx@tempa {\blx@xml@comme   After commenting out either biblatex or autonum, the errors disappear. Is there a benchmark tool for Ubuntu? Is there a benchmark tool to measure computer performance for Ubuntu like SuperPI, 3DMark, or PCMark? Word for "willing to try new and unfamiliar things" Example:  A: Hey, do you like to do bungee jumping? B: Um, OK. Haven't done it before, but let's try it.  I'm not looking for adventurous or something similar. That word should also fit in less action-packed activities:  A: I have a new board game. Do you like to play? B: I don't know this game and, actually, I don't like these varieties of games but I'll play. Maybe it's fun.  First I thought about open-minded but I think this means more willing to listen to people, think about their ideas, arguments, ... and accept them (not necessarily agree). What word describes person who is willing to try activities he doesn't know or hasn't experienced before? Singular or plural verb form where subject includes a "parenthetical" element My question arises from , where OP asks whether he should use the singular or plural verb form after "the title, as well as the tone,"  As luck would have it, when I searched Google Books for , I found...        ...and...        At the risk of having this question closed as just peeving, I feel that the first one should have been plural "err", because without the commas it seems to me both "the title" and "the tone" have more or less equal status as "joint" subjects of the verb, making it plural.  On the other hand, I feel the commas in the second example effectively demote "the tone" to "parenthetical" status (the clause is almost incidental). Since this encourages us think of "the title" as the primary subject, it should have been singular "derives".  I'm no great fan of "grammatical rules", but it seems weird to me that the only two relevant examples for this specific wording should both (in opposite ways!) contradict my inclinations.  What's going on? Leave newlines intact in bounty messages How can I fix a 404 Error when using a PPA or updating my package lists? Can we implement temporary automatic comment ban on 'x' number of validated rude comment flags? There's been problems with abusive comments since the site started.   We still haven't managed to conquer the issue.   Users can be issued chat bans and post bans. The API automatically bans IP addresses with validated spam flags. (Would it be difficult to implement comment bans? Would mods have the power to impose comment restrictions?).   Although comments have been classically referred to as second class citizens, rude comments on the site are the one place that is driving people away.   Can we implement temporary automatic comment ban on 'x' number of validated rude comment flags? It would probably be better if the exact heuristics were not disclosed publicly, much like the serial voting scripts  This question  was asked 7 years ago. Can we revisit it?  This question is related, but is asking for a more complex approach: I want to create a text file which will add each command I am going to run on the terminal as a new line entry in the text file. i.e., I need to keep a record of what are the things I'm doing in the terminal. Further if I can keep a record of outputs I'm getting in the terminal, along with the inputs in the terminal, as a text file, it will be much better.   Each time I forget a command I have to search again in the Internet for the command.  Can I can make a file like above? how can I open a extra console and run a program in it with one command? So I know if I type gnome-terminal or xterm, a new window will be popped out. Then I checked the man page for these two, nothing relevant found.  Then I noticed under Mac you can do it with the program open. But it seems under Linux it's not that trivial.  Does anyone have experience? What is $A^-$ in topology? Hartshorne Algebraic Geometry Proposition 1.5 (page5) In a notherian topological space $X$, every nomempty closed subset $Y$ can be expressed as a finite union $Y=Y_1 \cup \cdots \cup Y_r$ of irreducible closed subsets $Y_i$. If we require that $Y_i \nsupseteq Y_j$ for $i \neq j$, then the $Y_i$ are uniquely determined. They are called the irreducible components of $Y$.    I understood the existence of such a representation. But I can't understand a sentence in  the uniqueness part, which I highlighted: Let $Y=Y_1 \cup \cdots \cup Y_r$ and $Y=Y&#39;_1 \cup \cdots \cup Y&#39;_s$ be two such representation. Then we can deduce that $Y_1=Y&#39;_1$ (the details are in the textbook). Now let $Z=(Y-Y_1)^-$, then $Z=Y_2 \cup \cdots \cup Y_r$ and also $Z=Y&#39;_2 \cup \cdots \cup Y&#39;_s$.  What is the operator $^-$? I understood it as a closure, is it right? But then how can I deduce that $Z$ is represented as $Z=Y_2 \cup \cdots \cup Y_r=Y&#39;_2 \cup \cdots \cup Y&#39;_s$? How can I switch between starting a coroutine vs running the routine all at once? Does anyone know how to make the character picker appear more quickly?   I use it enough now in my German language studies that it has become second nature for the critical marks and much faster than using the alt+keypress shortcuts.   Only problem is that it's so second nature that sometimes it doesn't pop up quickly enough so I end up typing the character and the number shortcut sometimes (IE u2 instead of ü). Anyone know how to make it appear with less delay? Ideally, I'd love if I could just hold the character and press the number but it appears that OSX insists on waiting for the menu to pop up.