Why does the following generate an error?  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{enumitem} \begin{document}  \begin{description}[label=\emph{\alph*})]  \item [aaa] bbbb  \item [eee] əəəə   \end{description} \end{document}
How can a list be created, whose items are both    enumerated (a,b,c,d,...)  and allow for setting a description via \item[texthere] ?   Im am using MikTex on Windows.
I stupidly ran sudo chown -R carlos:carlos / and carlos is my user. This changed all files to be Carlos and I could not boot up again (because the root files were now owned by #1000) and I cant get sudo acess in live cd (because the owner of /usr was changed to my user). Can anyone help me? FYI I have mounted my hard drive. How does body fat leave your body? So I know that it’s not from tears or sweat because they are composed of mainly water and sodium, it’s not from going poo or pee as poo and pee are made of the parts of food that supply your body with no nutrients and your body also doesn’t “burn body fat” because there is a theory that no matter is ever destroyed so it’s none of those but another thing is it’s not your hair, ear wax, finger nails or anything of that sort because people can lose over 17 pounds in 3 months but you can’t build up that amount of hair , ear wax or whatever else in three months so how does body fat leave your body What is polarisation, spin, helicity, chirality and parity? Polarisation, spin, helicity, chirality and parity keep confusing me. They seem to be related, but exactly how they are related is unclear to me. Can someone maybe give a short overview about what these quantities mean and how they are related? What are the values for e.g. basic particles like electron or photon? I'm trying to go through and provide answers to every unanswered question (search &quot;closed:0 answers:0&quot;), somewhat following the spirit that was blogged about at  .  However, I'm finding this much more difficult than it needs to be, as many of the questions have already been answered without the use of an &quot;answer&quot; - but instead, in the form of a comment by either the OP or another poster. I wouldn't mind reading through and skipping these, as long as there was some appropriate action I could take to at least assist with preventing these questions from being seen again from the same query - either by myself or another SO member.  Is there such an appropriate action?  Should we vote to close?  If so, using what reason? Even if I vote to close, what are the chances that 4 other users will also view the question and also vote to close?  (i.e., will my individual vote even do any good?  Is there any report to show recent close votes, so that others may also review and contribute supporting close votes?) Should we post some sort of an answer - even just something to the effect of &quot;this was already answered by the OP's own comment to his answer (above)&quot;? Would something like this be appropriate to flag for moderator attention, and let the moderators deal with it?  (Or would this be considered too trivial?) Should we rename the question title to something standard that can be used in a search exclusion?  (Maybe &quot;SOLVED:&quot;?)  Basically, how can I help to denote questions as &quot;This question is no longer in active search of an answer - though better answers may still be appreciated.&quot;? I've already reviewed , which was closed as a duplicate of  - but this requires effort on part of a user who may very likely no longer be active. Otherwise, is there something I should be doing to improve my search to filter out these types of questions? I've run across this many times, so I don't consider it to be a rare issue.  However, the last question like this I just ran across, prompting this question, was .  In this case, the question was self-answered by the OP in the form of a comment, this question is the OP's only question, the OP has no other visible activity on SO, and the OP hasn't been seen on SO since he registered and posted the question 5 months ago. Another one I just ran across is .  However, here the &quot;answer&quot; comment was posted by a reputable and recently active SO member.  Should I leave a comment directed at him, asking him to re-post his comment as an answer, or should I post my own answer echoing his comment?  (Or something else?) Yet another is .  Interestingly, the OP actually self-edited the question to include the &quot;SOLVED:&quot; prefix on to the question, instead of posting his resolving comment as an answer (and ideally accepting it) as he was asked to do by another comment.  This brings up another good idea - is there a &quot;standard&quot; we should use to rename the titles on these &quot;resolved but unanswered&quot; posts that could be used as a search exclusion?  (Also added to the above list.) How to convince stakeholders to invest in proper UX? I'm working on a web app with a team of 5, including me. One database administrator, one project manager, two programmers and me the front-end designer. This project is an internal reporting system.  Anyways, I've struggling a little bit with my team, the DBA and two programmers seem to control our meetings with what Data we are going to pull and the best way to work it into an object model.  And then look to me to design some pretty interface.  Truth is, we've never measured the objectives of this application and what strategy will best meet them from a front-end design/UX standpoint. We've done no wire frames, no planning of content, no planning of pages, no conversations on specific interface components, nothing like that. It seems my team is content with designing and building the entire UX/UI based on a couple of ideas we've spit-balled in meetings.  Forgive me if this sounds too much like a gripe, but I'm at a loss. How do I get my team to understand, we can't just throw the front-end together based on back-end data and the interface HAS to be well planned out and organized? S. Weinberg, “The Quantum theory of fields: Foundations” (1995), Eq. (9.2.15) In Weinberg's book The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume 1 on p.388 (Chapter 9), the following identity is used (with $f$ being any "reasonable" function):  $$f(+\infty) + f(-\infty) = \lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0^+} \epsilon \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\tau f(\tau) e^{-\epsilon |\tau|}.\tag{9.2.15} $$  I don't understand the identity in a qualitative / heuristic way. Removing Ubuntu from UEFI Bios Menu RESTful Authentication What does RESTful Authentication mean and how does it work?  I can't find a good overview on Google.  My only understanding is that you pass the session key (remeberal) in the URL, but this could be horribly wrong. Should it be obvious that independent quantum states are composed by taking the tensor product? Knots in Smoothing Splines In , there's this line under the section describing Smoothing Spline's tuning parameter $\lambda$:       In fitting a smoothing spline, we do not need to select the number or   location of knots - there will be a knot at each training observation,   $x_1,...,x_n$.   But, in my opinion wouldn't that be overfitting?     Reason for such a claim: If there are more points which act as knots in the Spline fit, then the range for each slot for fitting is very small. Thus each change in the data, is recognized and imititated in the fit. Thus fitting the changes, which are random, and do not mean anything. Thus overfitting.    Possibilities: We know that cubic splines and Smoothing splines are different. The basic differences are:     Smoothing splines try to minimize the function $$\sum_{i=1}^n(y_i-g(x_i))^2+\lambda\int g''(t)^2dt$$ Smoothing splines shrink the parameters.   Moreover, Smoothing Splines are basically natural cubic splines, and thus they're smooth too.  So, how can these differences( and properties) save the Smoothing Spline from overfitting? Is there anything else that I'm missing here? Archimedes' principle for two liquid layers Problem: I have a cylindrical vessel of height $H$ and radius $R$. There are two liquid layers in the vessel. The first has density $D_1$ and height $h_1$, the second has density $D_2$ and height $h_2$. The second liquid is floating on the first liquid (thus $D_2 &lt; D_1$) and they are both entirely within the vessel ($h_1+h_2 \le H$). Now I have a cube of density $D$ and edge length $n$. The cube fits into the vessel ($n \le \sqrt2R$) but it might not be completely inside it ($n&gt;H$ is possible). I place it into the vessel such that one side is horizontal (the cube is not lopsided). Some liquid might overflow as a result. How do I use Archimedes' principle to calculate the topmost liquid level after placing the cube? I can ignore damping and other physical effects. EDIT: Note that the only values I know are $H, R, D_1, h_1, D_2, h_2, n$ and their abovementioned constraints.  My workings: I tried using the formula directly, where $\text{weight of cube}=\text{weight of displaced liquid}$. I first get $Dn^3=D_2n^2s_2$ where $s_2$ is the height submerged in the second liquid. If $s_2 \le h_2$ then the cube is only submerged in the second liquid. So the answer is $\min(H, h_1+h_2+{n^2s_2\over\pi R^2})$, accounting for overflows. This case is simple. But if $s_2&gt;h_2$ then the cube can be submerged in the first liquid too. I thought of subtracting the weight of the second liquid displaced to obtain the height submerged in first liquid, but realize that I don't know that. The weight displaced depends on the final liquid height, which can be affected by overflows, whether the cube fits totally within the two liquids, etc. In fact, it can be the case that after the liquid level rises, the cube now displaces more of the second liquid, causing it to not be submerged in the first (is that even possible?) It seems very messy and I have no idea how to start. :( Does anyone have a nice solution to this problem? Exit from both root and user with one command I know about "not using sudo su -" etc. But let's be honest, almost all of us do it.   So, here is the issue. We can't have root logins enabled, so we have to ssh in as our user then su to root.  Here is the process tree:       1  7897  7826  7826 ?           -1 S     1000   0:00 sshd: josh@pts/0  7897  7898  7898  7898 pts/0     8182 Ss    1000   0:00  \_ -bash  7898  7990  7990  7898 pts/0     8182 S        0   0:00      \_ sudo su -  7990  7991  7990  7898 pts/0     8182 S        0   0:00          \_ su -  7991  7992  7992  7898 pts/0     8182 S        0   0:00              \_  -su  7992  8182  8182  7898 pts/0     8182 R+       0   0:00                  \_ ps axjf   I would like to exit from root, then from my user with one command. Is there a way to do this?  BTW exit &amp;&amp; exit does not work because it exits the shell and doesnt process the rest of the command  josh@ubuntu:~$ sudo su - root@ubuntu:~# exit &amp;&amp; exit logout josh@ubuntu:~$ conjunction of disjunctions and disjunction of conjunctions $(p∨q) ∧ (p∨r) ∧ (q∨r) \iff (p∧q) ∨ (p∧r) ∨ (q∧r)$  Without using set theory, how can I prove this using logical equivalences? I've tried to approach this problem with De Morgan and I've also tried the property of distributivity but I keep reaching a dead end.   How should I approach this problem?  Thank  you. The story is basically told from an alien's point of view. Essentially they observed us from far off, deemed us as violent and a danger to the universe, and set course (asteroid or something) to kill us. They kept observing and saw all the art and beauty we created and realized we were actually not so bad, but by then they couldn't stop it. So it was sort of also an apology letter to Earth in the end.  First read it like a year ago online and I can't find any trace of it anymore, nor can I recall the site it was on. Anyone know what short story this is? Filtering questions by multiple tags I know you can select a tag and then click on unanswered to view the unanswered questions for that tag.  But is there a way to view questions only for a certain set of tags > 1 tag?  Mainly I'd like the union of tag1 with tag2 with tag3 with tag4. But also the intersection of tags would be nice as well. I have a Toshiba satellite A-200 laptop with a Vista OS on it with 4 NTFS partitions  (C:) Vista  (D:) Entertainment  (E:) Work  (F:) Sources   and I wanted to start using Ubuntu instead. So I tried it first from the live CD and everything was OK and all the partitions were shown and working and so I decided to install Ubuntu to replace Vista on the (C:) drive. After I did that I can no longer find my folders and files on the (D:), (E:), (F:) partitions and the only file system that is shown is one 198 GB although my HDD is 320 GB.  I can't access the lost data on the remaining 120 GB which I hope is still there and not totally lost  I am now working from the live CD but I am unable to install testdisk. Can I recover the Vista partitions by the product recovery CD to get my laptop back to the factory settings? Can I recover the NTFS partitions using a recovery program for Windows or will that make the problem worse?   I need these data badly as I don't have a backup for them. I have a Java String that contains XML, with no line feeds or indentations. I would like to turn it into a String with nicely formatted XML. How do I do this?  String unformattedXml = "&lt;tag&gt;&lt;nested&gt;hello&lt;/nested&gt;&lt;/tag&gt;"; String formattedXml = new [UnknownClass]().format(unformattedXml);   Note: My input is a String. My output is a String.   (Basic) mock result:    &lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt; &lt;root&gt;   &lt;tag&gt;     &lt;nested&gt;hello&lt;/nested&gt;   &lt;/tag&gt; &lt;/root&gt; I would like to open all chapters of my PDF ebooks in the same window but neither evince nor okular seems to be capable of doing that (at least not out-of-the-box).  Is there a way to work this out? Live USB for installation does not boot, black error screen followed by visual artifacts on a purple screen I'm trying to install Ubuntu 18.04 desktop with Rufus on a computer with the following specs:  CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 MOBO: ASUS Prime B450M-A/CSM RAM: G-Skill Ripjaws DDR4 F4-2400C15D-16GVB GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX750 PSU: Apexgaming AG-650M SSHD: Seagate Firecuda Compute mATX: Rosewill SCM-01  Basically it boots from the USB (FAT32) and brings up a black error screen with words and numbers. Then it transitions to the purple splash screen with &quot;ubuntu&quot; and 5 dots, however the screen shows various visual glitches depending on which USB port I plug into. When trying to boot the computer, it boots to a black screen with the following error message: ACPI Error: Needed [Integer/String/Buffer], found [Region]    that shows what I mean. What is the probability that a person is the second person to roll a 6 for the first time? Suppose $A$, $B$, and $C$ roll a die in turns. What is the probability that $A$ is the second person to roll a $6$ for the first time?