I want to study Einsteins General Theory of Relativity, but before i start reading about it can anyone of you recommend some good books about Curved Geometry? since i will need it to understand the first part.
What are some good books for learning general relativity?
Prove $4(x + y + z)^3 > 27(x^2y + y^2z + z^2x)$ Prove that, for all positive real numbers $x$, $y$ and $z$, $$4(x + y + z)^3 &gt; 27(x^2y + y^2z + z^2x)$$  I've tried expressing it as a sum of squares, but haven't got anywhere.   Hints are also welcome. How can I draw a graph like the diagram below? I'm trying, but something is wrong with my code in LaTeX: \begin{asy} pair dynkinMark(real x, real y, string s = &quot;&quot;, pen p = defaultpen, pair B = dir(45)) { if (s != &quot;&quot;) { dot(&quot;$&quot;+s+&quot;$&quot;, (x,y), B, p); }     else { dot((x,y), p); }     return (x,y); }  dynkinMark(0,1, &quot;1&quot;, dir(135)); dynkinMark(0,2, &quot;2&quot;, dir(135)); dynkinMark(0,3, &quot;3&quot;, dir(135)); dynkinMark(0,4, &quot;4&quot;, dir(135)); dynkinMark(7,1, &quot;1'&quot;); dynkinMark(7,2, &quot;2'&quot;); dynkinMark(7,3, &quot;3'&quot;); dynkinMark(7,4, &quot;4'&quot;); path p1 = (0,1)..(2,2.0)..(5,3.5)..(7,4); path p2 = (0,2)..(2,1.2)..(5,2.5)..(7,3); path p3 = (0,3)..(2,2.8)..(5,1.5)..(7,1); path p4 = (0,4)..(2,3.8)..(5,3.5)..(7,2); draw(p1, blue); draw(p2, heavycyan); draw(p3, mediumcyan); draw(p4, lightblue); dot(&quot;$12$&quot;, IP(p1, p2), dir(90), heavygreen); dot(&quot;$13$&quot;, IP(p1, p3), dir(90), heavygreen); dot(&quot;$23$&quot;, IP(p2, p3), dir(90), heavygreen); dot(&quot;$14$&quot;, IP(p1, p4), dir(90), heavygreen); dot(&quot;$24$&quot;, IP(p2, p4), dir(90), heavygreen); real y = 0.8; label(&quot;$s_1$&quot;, (IP(p1,p2).x, y), heavygreen); label(&quot;$s_2$&quot;, (IP(p1,p3).x, y), heavygreen); label(&quot;$s_1$&quot;, (IP(p2,p3).x, y), heavygreen); label(&quot;$s_3$&quot;, (IP(p1,p4).x, y), heavygreen); label(&quot;$s_2$&quot;, (IP(p2,p4).x, y), heavygreen); \end{asy} I would like to enable the root account on my Ubuntu installation.  I realize the security implications of this. Given the Python function:  def a_method(arg1, arg2):     pass   How can I extract the number and names of the arguments. I.e., given that I have a reference to func, I want the func.[something] to return ("arg1", "arg2").  The usage scenario for this is that I have a decorator, and I wish to use the method arguments in the same order that they appear for the actual function as a key. I.e., how would the decorator look that printed "a,b" when I call a_method("a", "b")? How to remove the Unity Amazon package in 16.04? I was able to go to the ubuntu software center before and remove it and now it doesn't show up since the switch to the gnome software store. Trying the terminal method of removing the shopping lens doesn't work in this release. Using local OpenStreetMap (*.OSM) map with Openlayers 3? What do I need to load a .OSM map in a client side javascript app? (Imagine an offline webapp). Saving Working Files as PSD or TIFF? I was reading a few articles about how people saved their working files and it got me thinking about my own method. I used to save everything as a PSD, but recently I have started saving my working files as TIFF's. I use Windows, so I don't know if it's different for Apple users but with a PSD, all I can see is that "PSD" icon. But a TIFF file shows up as a normal image (that I can edit), so I found it really great when I have a lot of working files for one project and could just quickly preview it without opening the program.  That being said, I am no expert in which method is better. And I know a lot of people here are pretty seasoned users in all things Adobe, so I was wondering what your two cent on the whole topic is?   Is there really any difference to saving it as a PSD or TIFF? Is there something I should specifically know about saving my files as a TIFF rather than a PSD? Question  I calculated the classical heat capacity of a diatomic gas as $C_V = (9/2)Nk_B$, however the accepted value is $C_V = (7/2)Nk_B$.  I assumed the classical Hamiltonian of two identical atoms bound together as $$ H = \dfrac{1}{2m}( |\bar{p}_2|^2 + |\bar{p}_2|^2)+ \dfrac{\alpha}{2} |\bar{q}_1-\bar{q}_2|^2. $$ I calculated the partition function of $N$ particles as $$ Z = \left( \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty} \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty} \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty} \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta H} ~d^3q_1~d^3p_1~d^3q_2~d^3p_2 \right)^N \propto V^N T^{(9/2)N}. $$ I calcuated the heat capacity as $$ C_V = \dfrac{\partial }{\partial T} \left( k_B T^2 \dfrac{\partial \ln(Z)}{\partial T} \right) = \dfrac{9}{2}k_BN. $$  Why does the classical argument fail?  Classical Derivation  The partition function is \begin{align} Z &amp;=&amp; \left( \frac{1}{h^6} \int \mathrm{e}^{- \beta H(\bar{q}_1,\bar{q}_2,\bar{p}_1,\bar{p}_2)} ~d^{3}q_1 ~d^{3}q_2 ~d^{3}p_1   ~d^{3}p_2 \right)^N \\&amp;=&amp; \left( \frac{1}{h^6} \int \mathrm{e}^{- \beta ((|\bar{p}_1|^2+|\bar{p}_2|^2)/(2m)+\alpha |\bar{q}_1-\bar{q}_2|^2/2)} ~d^{3}q_1 ~d^{3}q_2 ~d^{3}p_1   ~d^{3}p_2 \right)^N \end{align} A useful gaussian integral \begin{align} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\gamma (x-x_0)^2}dx = \sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{\gamma}} \end{align} The partition function can be evaluated using separated integrals \begin{align} \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{e}^{- \beta |\bar{p}_1|^2} ~d^{3}p_1 = \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{e}^{- \beta |\bar{p}_2|^2} ~d^{3}p_2 = \left(\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{\beta}}\right)^3 \end{align} and \begin{align} \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty} \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{e}^{- \beta \alpha |\bar{q}_1-\bar{q}_2|^2/2 } ~d^{3}q_1 ~d^{3}q_2 = \left( \sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{\beta \alpha/2}} \right)^3 \iiint_{-\infty}^{\infty}  ~d^{3}q_1 = \left( \sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{\beta \alpha/2}} \right)^3 V \end{align} The last set of integrals are improper integrals. One has to take the limit as the space approaches infinite containment. In that limit, integrating one set of variables $d^3q_2$ approaches the limit of a finite Gaussian term, while the other $d^3q_1$ approaches the diverging value of the total volume of the gas.  The partition function is \begin{align} Z &amp;=&amp; \left( h^{-6} \left(\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{\beta}}\right)^3 \left(\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{\beta}}\right)^3 \left( \sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{\beta \alpha/2}} \right)^3 V \right)^N \\&amp;=&amp; \left( h^{-6} \left(k_B T \pi\right)^{9/2} \left( \dfrac{2}{\alpha} \right)^{3/2} V \right)^N \\&amp;=&amp; \left( h^{-6} \left(k_B \pi\right)^{9/2} \left( \dfrac{2}{\alpha} \right)^{3/2} \right)^N V^N T^{9N/2} \end{align} DOS of Van Hove singularity in 2D square lattice tight binding model For the simplest example, 2D square lattice tight binding model gives the energy band as $$\varepsilon_k=-2t(\cos k_x+\cos k_y) \, .$$ We know that $\mathbf{k}=(0,\pi)$ and related momentum points are saddle points which give $|\nabla_k \varepsilon_k|=0$ and thus some kind of singularity in density of state (DOS) since $$\rho(\varepsilon)\propto \int_{\varepsilon=\text{const}} \frac{d S}{|\nabla_k \varepsilon_k|} \, .$$ How can I get the $\ln$ divergence for DOS near $\varepsilon=0$? Should I only care about those singularity points and omit the integral from normal parts and do Taylor expansion near those saddle points?   Moreover, why are points like $(\pi/2,-\pi/2)$ or $(2\pi/3,-\pi/3)$ not called Van Hove points when those points are also lie in the $\varepsilon=0$ line and give $|\nabla_k \varepsilon_k|=0$? Prove  that the function $\displaystyle f(x)=\frac{x}{x^2+1}$ is continuous at $x=-1$. You should give a proof that is directly based on the  definition of continuity.   I saw many similar questions on this website, but none of them gave me a satisfactory answer. I more or less understand how epsilon-delta proofs work but my problem lies more in the algebraic manipulations probably. So here's my "attempt".  Definition of continuity; for $f:A \to \mathbb{R}$     $$\forall \varepsilon &gt;0 \ \exists\delta&gt;0\ \forall x \forall x_0 \in A:|x-x_0|&lt;\delta \Rightarrow |f(x)-f(x_0)|&lt;\varepsilon$$   So from what I understand, the procedure for epsilon-delta proofs are as follows: 1. Plug the point of interest $x_0$ into $|f(x)-f(x_0)|&lt;\varepsilon$ 2. Write $x$ in terms of $\varepsilon$ 3. Then plug $x$ into $|x-x_0|&lt;\delta$ 4. Find $\delta$ in terms of $\varepsilon$. Done    At step 1, we have $\left|\dfrac{x}{x^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{2}\right|&lt;\varepsilon$. Step 2 is where I'm stuck because of the 2nd degree polynomial in the denominator. First, I did this: $\left|\dfrac{x}{x^2+1}\right|&lt;\left|\dfrac{x}{x^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{2}\right|&lt;\varepsilon$. Then, I wasn't too sure about what to do, I thought about getting rid of the "$1$", but that would screw up my inequality. I thought about factoring $x^2+1$, but it doesn't have any real roots. I tried inverting the fraction, but that led me to nowhere. And I've already exhausted the tools I have. How do I proceed?  Apparently, epsilon-delta proofs are the most basic building blocks of analysis. And I'm already failing, this is both embarrassing and depressing... Dual monitor setup, why does NVidia 340 Prime only detect one monitor? Supremum and infimum of sets I've recently started to study supremum and infimum, and I'm having trouble determining the supremum and infimum of the following sets:  $ A = \left\{ {mn\over 1+ m+n} \mid m, n \in \mathbb N \right\} $ $ B = \left\{ {mn\over 4m^2+m+n^2} \mid m, n \in \mathbb N \right\} $ $ C = \left\{ {m\over \vert m\vert +n} \mid m \in \mathbb Z, n \in \mathbb N \right\} $ $ D = \left\{ {n\over 3} - \left[{n\over 3}\right] \mid m, n \in \mathbb N \right\} $   In $D$, the $[\; ]$ denotes the integral part of ${n\over 3}$.   $E = \{x \mid x \text{ is decimal fraction between } 0 \text{ and } 1 \text{ that has the digits } 0 \text{ and } 1\}$.  In my progress so far I was able to verify that sup $\{x \in A\} = +∞$  Setting $m = (n-1)$ to get  $$ \frac{mn}{1+m+n}= \frac{n(n-1)}{1 + n + n-1} = \frac{n(n-1)}{2n} = \frac{n-1}{2} $$  That way $\frac{n-1}{2}\in A$ for every $n\geq 2$. Thus, the supremum of $A$ is bigger than $\frac{n-1}{2}$ for every integer $n$.  I don't know how to go past this. x_x  Any help would be greatly appreciated! How to rank a million images with a crowdsourced sort Hint proving this $\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{2n}{k}k=n2^{2n-1}$ I need hint proving this $$\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{2n}{k}k=n2^{2n-1}$$ I tried to open Software Center using the command line   software-center   and it did work. I mean, Software Center opened and works fine, BUT, at the same time, in the Terminal window I see a lot of strange errors. How can that be? I'm puzzled.   Is there any explanation for this (and a fix for it)? I repeat, the app does open and it works fine, is only the lines in the background that show that something is not all right.  Here are the screen-shots with all the lines. How to print all printable ASCII chars in CLI? How should I structure my URLs for both SEO and localization? When I set up a site in multiple languages, how should I set up my URLs for search engines and usability?  Let's say my site is www.example.com, and I'm translating into French and Spanish. What is best for usability and SEO?  Directory option:  http://www.example.com/sample.html http://www.example.com/fr/sample.html http://www.example.com/es/sample.html   Subdomain option:  http://www.example.com/sample.html http://fr.example.com/sample.html http://es.example.com/sample.html   Filename option:  http://www.example.com/sample.html http://www.example.com/sample.fr.html http://www.example.com/sample.es.html   Accept-Language header:  Or should I simply parse the  header and generate content server-side to suit that header?  Is there another way to do this? If the different language versions don't have different urls, what do I do about the search engines?    UPDATE 2011-12-06  Google has new recommendations for meta tags for explicitly pointing to other language content: .  UPDATE 2012-05-25  Related but not precisely:   UPDATE 2013-06-12  includes discussion of several URL schemes directly relevant to the question. How can I (in order of preference, descending):   Disable file-server access to a specific share for a user or group based on the time of day. Disable file-server access entirely for a user or group based on the time of day Disable file-server access entirely (server-scope) based on the time of day. This is not at all related to Remote Desktop/RDP access.   For example, Bob is in the group WorkHours. The share "Documents" grants access to users in the group WorkHours. How do I deny access to all files in the share "Documents" from 7PM to midnight, every day, automatically? Short Question:  Why can we manipulate a read-only file in Vim using : + w + q + ! even without being an administrator?  Long Question:  I have a text file (myFile.txt) which is read-only for everyone:  navid@navid-ThinkPad-T530:~/ubuntuTest$ ls -l myFile.txt  -r--r--r-- 1 navid navid 26 Aug 22 21:21 myFile.txt   I can open it with Vim without having admin privileges:  navid@navid-ThinkPad-T530:~/ubuntuTest$ vi myFile.txt    I modify it and press: Esc + : + w + q + Enter and I see this error message:  E45: 'readonly' option is set (add ! to override)   So far, everything makes sense.  But when I press: Esc + : + w + q + ! + Enter, Vim saves the changes.  I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 and VIM 7.4. For a polynomial $p(z)$, prove there exist $R>0$, such that if $|z|=R$, then $|p(z)|\geq |a_n|R^n/2$ For a polynomial $p(z)=a_0+\ldots+a_nz^n$, prove there exist $R&gt;0$, such that if $|z|=R$, then $|p(z)|\geq |a_n|R^n/2$.  I get $|p(z)|\geq |a_n|R^n$, which makes that factor of $1/2$ useless. So I must have done something wrong.  $$|\frac{\partial^n{f}}{\partial z^n}(P)|\leq \frac{\sup_{z\in \overline{D}(P,r)} |f(z)|k!}{r^k}$$. This is the Cauchy estimate.   $$|\frac{\partial^n{p}}{\partial z^n}(z)| = |a_n n!|$$ $$|\frac{\partial^n{p}}{\partial z^n}(0)|\leq \sup_{\zeta\in \overline{D}(0,|z|)} |p(\zeta)|n!/R^n$$ $$|a_n n!|\leq \sup_{\zeta\in \overline{D}(0,|z|)} |p(\zeta)|n!/R^n$$ $$R^n |a_n|\leq \sup_{\zeta\in \overline{D}(0,|z|)} |p(\zeta)|$$  There exist a $z_0$, such that $|z_0|&gt;0$ and $$\sup_{\zeta\in \overline{D}(0,|z_0|)} |p(\zeta)| = |p(z_0)|$$.  This is saying there exist a disk centered at the origin, such that $|p|$ is maximum on some point on the boundary.   Let $R=|z_0|$, we have $R^n |a_n|\leq |p(z_0)|$  Edit: I know what I got wrong. $z_0$ is just one point on the circle $|z| = R$. One can chose another point $z_1$ on the circle, such that $p(z_1)&lt;p(z_0)$.