I am an independent researcher with out a PhD and because of my curiosity in science in my free time I carries out some minor experiments. Using those experimental data I wrote a paper and I want to publish it as a research article.   My first question; Is there any journal available where an independent researcher can publish his/her work?  As I believe no such journals are available I thought of sending my articles to other peer reviewed journals?  But the problem is how will I address my author information   author information is given like this  Nora D. Volkow,1,2 Gene-Jack Wang,3 Joanna S. Fowler,3 and Dardo Tomasi2  1National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 2National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 3Medical Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973 Nora D. Volkow: vog.hin.adin@woklovn   As I am an independent researcher who is not working in the similar field of my research work, how should I give my author information?  Do I give my current employment details as author information  Eka, Supervisor, XYZ company   or my last school details  Eka, University of Earth
Recently my paper is reviewed (by a professor from independent third party) and accepted by a journal. But, my employer allows me to publish this paper only without its name there.  Publishing house is expecting affiliation for each author, i.e. I can not leave affiliation as blank.   What should I write as the affiliation?
Do any queries exist that require RIGHT JOIN, or can they always be re-written with LEFT JOIN?  And more specifically, how do you re-write this one without the right join (and I guess implicitly without any subqueries or other fanciness):   SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.k2 = t2.k2 RIGHT JOIN t3 ON t3.k3 = t2.k3 Why does ice make such peculiar sounds? I've come across a couple of videos where some interesting sounds are produced using ice.  (Click on the images to see the video.)      Here, they drop a block of ice into a deep crevice and as the block falls, you can hear some strange sounds. These sounds remind me of some sound effects in old cartoons and sci-fi movies. The pitch of the sounds start high and end up low. Is this some kind of doppler effect?      Here, there's a man performing 'nordic skating', making the same sounds as he skates on top of a thin ice sheet. Maybe they are caused by the cracking ice. But why does that sound like this?    There are some other videos too, where they skip stones on frozen lakes.    Here the ice makes some high-frequency sounds which correspond to the chirping of birds.  What are these sounds and why do they sound the way they sound? FIELD_INTEGRITY_EXCEPTION: field integrity exception: unknown (invalid user or group: 005XXXXXXXXXXXX) I've a object called myobject__c. This object is private in OWD Setting.  Now when admin create a new record of this object then I want to share this record with a user(community user). For this I've written a code in trigger to create a sharing record of this object (myobject__Share).  But I am getting a problem of :-      FIELD_INTEGRITY_EXCEPTION: field integrity exception: unknown (invalid   user or group: 005XXXXXXXXXXXXX).   how can I solve this problem and second doubt is can we create share record for community user or not. Are the LIGO observations proof of a black hole merger, and what happened to the black holes? Recent reports claim that the gravitational waves detected by LIGO match up with the signal expected from two black holes merging as predicted by general relativity.  Additionally, the masses of both black holes were estimated. Questions:  How certain are we that the detected of gravitational waves are necessarily from two black holes merging?  Since supermassive black holes are typically at the center of a host galaxy, what happened to the galaxies that contained the two merging black holes?  For example, did their host galaxies merge?    Edit After reading the answers, I understand that the signals detected by LIGO are proof of the validity of gravitational wave generational artifacts as predicted by general relativity.  When additionally gravitational waves, caused by the merger of the supermassive black holes (those which ARE indeed located in the centers of the merging galaxies) will be detected, since mergers of galaxies could be observed by the methods independent of gravitational waves such as registering the fact of the quasar appearance (). Additional questions:  Could someone offer me the historical ASTRONOMY precedent when the second degree of inference (from the mathematical model, being associated with the theory of Physics) was accepted as the discovery of the astronomical object?  Could someone give a reference to trustable scientific publication, with the subject of study being discussion of requirements satisfying claim of astronomical discovery of an astronomical object?  Have independent scientific sources (outside of members of the LIGO team) analyzed methodology and results of the LIGO signal detection, and published their conclusions with regards of what was actually discovered? Keyboard shortcut to autocomplete the user in comments Disable or prevent multitouch in Activity I know it has been discussed that it is not possible to start an application from an usb drive upon connection due to limitations of autorun (or autoplay??) in Win 7. But it is possible to create a scheduled task having an event type trigger. Surely there must be an event occurring when the drive -- or any USB device, for that matter -- is connected.    Does anybody have the slightest idea which Event ID should I use? Or at least what type of event? Where can I find the event in event viewer? Solve for $x$ in the $80^\circ$-$80^\circ$-$20^\circ$ triangle I've been solving this for days but I still I couldn't solve this. Can I know how to solve $x$ ? Restricing domains for universal and existential quantifiers I am currently using Rosen's "Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications" (7th ed.) for my discrete mathematics course. We recently talked about quantifiers, more specifically the universal and existential quantifier. What confuses me is when we started talking about restricting the domain (i.e. instead of all real numbers, only all real positive numbers), where does the conditional statement come from when restricting the domain of a universal quantifier and where does the conjunction come from when restricting the domain of a existential quantifier?  This link did help:   However, the part that confuses here is how are the domains restricted in the answer given in the link above? Is there a ZIP code I can enter when paying-at-the-pump in the USA with a foreign credit card? In the USA, many  fuel dispensers that accept credit cards require a  that corresponds to the billing address of the credit card.  In Canada, for instance, we have , so it's not obvious what you're supposed to type in since the gas dispensers have only numeric keypads.  Entering '00000' or '90210' seems to always result in failed authorization.  Is there a zip code that works for credit cards with foreign billing addresses? Automatic field should take the required entry Evaluation of $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{1}{2n}\cdot \ln \binom{2n}{n}$ The security guard problem Showing that a one-to-one linear transformation maps a linearly independent set onto a linearly independent set Problem 4.3.32 in Linear Algebra, Lay:  Let $V$ and $W$ be vector spaces, let $T:V\to W$ be a linear transformation, and let $\{\mathbf{v}_1, \dots , \mathbf{v}_p \}$ be a subset of $V$. Suppose that $T$ is a one-to-one transformation [...]. Show that if the set of images $\{T(\mathbf{v}_1), \dots ,T(\mathbf{v}_p)\}$ is linearly dependent, then $\{\mathbf{v}_1, \dots , \mathbf{v}_p \}$ is linearly dependent. This fact shows that a one-to-one linear transformation maps a linearly independent set onto a linearly independent set.  All I can think of doing: If $\{T(\mathbf{v}_1), \dots ,T(\mathbf{v}_p)\}$ is linearly dependent, then there exist weights $c_1, \dots, c_p$, not all zero, so that $$c_1 T(\mathbf{v}_1) + \cdots + c_p T(\mathbf{v}_p) = \mathbf{0}$$ Since $T$ is linear: $$c_1 T(\mathbf{v}_1) + \cdots + c_p T(\mathbf{v}_p) = T(c_1\mathbf{v}_1) + \cdots + T(c_p \mathbf{v}_p)=T(c_1 \mathbf{v}_1 +\cdots + c_p \mathbf{v}_p)=\mathbf{0}$$ So the set $\{\mathbf{v}_1, \dots , \mathbf{v}_p \}$ must be linearly dependent. Am I missing something? And why must $T$ be on-to-one for this to be true? An example showing that it is not true if $T$ is not one-to-one would be great! polar decomposition of a square A when A is not full rank/invertible The residue at $\infty$ Is there a way to find the number of accepted answers you have, other than manually counting each one? There is a bar of chocolate of size $N$ x $M$. Little square $(x, y)$ is poisoned. There are 2 players taking turns. In each move they can cut the bar along any of the horizontal or vertical lines, then the part which does not contain $(x, y)$ is being eaten. The player who is left only with square $(x, y)$ loses (beacause it is poisoned). Which player has the winning strategy? I guess that this game is equivalent to game of Nim due to Sprauge-Grundy theorem, but I don't know how. Creating symbol with size and color based on two variables in ArcMap? Absolute Value Symbols What is the "best LaTeX practices" for writing absolute value symbols?  Are there any packages which provide good methods?  Some options include |x| and \mid x \mid, but I'm not sure which is best...