I have installed Ubuntu 16.04 with Windows 10. No matter what I do, it always boots up Windows first. I have tried four ways:   Changed boot order using sudo efibootmgr -o command on Ubuntu. Used bcdedit /set {bootmgr} path \EFI\ubuntu\grubx64.efi to change the windows boot file. Used  on windows to change the File Path of the windows boot manager to both \EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi and \EFI\ubuntu\grubx64.efi. Again used  to change the order of different boot profiles.   Disappointingly, every boot process starts directly booting the windows. On checking the boot order and its settings I find that there are two windows boot profiles. One of these two always stay at the top, and is uneditable by every means that I tried.
Trying to install ubuntu on a laptop. The "bios/uefi" has no uefi boot options &amp; the windows boot manager just kicks in. The only "option" is "boot from hard disk". So we tried to use efibootmgr to put grub to boot first.  When we run an efibootmgr -o xxxx,xxxx,xxxx command it seems like the order gets fixed but on reboot the windows boot manager still has control, then when we re-opened the live usb &amp; checked the boot order it remains unaffected.  What are other ways to change the efi boot order? Maybe by mounting the efi partition (in mnt) and doing what?
Satisfying explanation of Aristotle's Wheel Paradox. The paradox:    We have a circle and there is another circle with smaller radius. They are co-centeric.  If circle make full turn without sliding, both smaller and bigger circle make full turn too. If we assume that the passed road is equal to the circumference of circles. We have got smaller circle's radius is equal to bigger one's.  Unsatisfying Solutions I found:    "Do not assume that smaller circle's circumference is equal to passed road since the surface that contacts to the ground is bigger one. " // Okey but it does not explain the paradox, it explains just what is the wrong assumption (even does not explain why it is a wrong assumption.) It is undeniable that every point on both smaller and bigger circle will contact exactly one and only one point on their path. Therefore we can think that this is a bijective maps and smaller circle is isomorphic to bigger one. (Okey but ....)   Question: What is the true answer? What is wrong with the definition of circumference of a circle and relationship with its taken path. What is object serialization? Difference between 2 numbers I need the perfect algorithm or C# function to calculate the difference (distance) between 2 decimal numbers.  For example the difference between: 100 and 25 is 75 100 and -25 is 125 -100 and -115 is 15 -500 and 100 is 600  Is there a C# function or a very elegant algorithm to calculate this or I have to go and handle every case separately with ifs.  If there is such a function or algorithm, which one is it? Open Safari / Google Chrome developer tools programmatically from JavaScript Reference to the Table of Contents page I thought that someone must have asked this, but my searches didn't find it.  I am looking to refer back to the table of contents from places in my document. How can I do this? What is a good way to draw images using pygame? Can we have a way to edit bounty custom message? Booking travel tickets for visa without paying? Integration by partial fractions; how and why does it work? Virtualbox Kernel driver not installed Why didn’t anyone dial Abydos before Daniel solved the mystery of the seventh symbol? From what I recall from the movie, Daniel only finds the seventh symbol... however when he explain they give way to show him the star gate and they put their sequence in the dialing computer. This proves the dialing computer was prepared to dial 7 chevrons.  It’s also stated they’ve also tested the 6 previous symbols in the order they appear on before, one has to assume only to fail when they insert the 7th, making them aware of the fact you can, at least dial 7th chevrons.  With 39 chevrons on the gate and 6 already locked in, that leaves 33 to try to get a lock. Those are not that many not to go and simply try one by one so... how come nobody brute forced the thing? Font characters displayed as squares in Ubuntu 18.04 Recently, on my Ubuntu 18.04 I have noticed that at least on gnome-calculator and chromium browser the fonts are displayed as squares. I have followed instructions  and , the calculator is fixed, but the problem on chromium still exists when I open a dialog to search for a file.  Not sure if this happens on other applications as well, I haven't checked all my apps, but File managers nemo and nautilus are working fine.  Also, before few months ago, I have included some windows fonts for my libre office shown . I used the copy (cp) method, not the link (ln -s). But, was working fine until yesterday. Haven't done any major change or update, at least on my Linux partition (dual boot). But, I don't think that this has anything to do with that.  Any idea how can I fix this issue?  . A program I am using spits out LaTeX tables in LaTeX files (outreg2 command from Stata), which I run using texify to make pdfs of the tables.  I crop these tables (using pdfcrop) and embed them elsewhere.  However, the pdfs include page numbers, which prevent pdfcrop from cropping directly around the table.  I need an automatic way to remove the page numbers before cropping.  I want to insert the command \pagenumbers{gobble} into the LaTeX code to automatically remove the page numbers.    I believe   texify --pdf --texinfo="\pagenumbering{gobble}" filename.tex   should work.  It does not. No exception pops up, but the page number remains. I cannot find documentation anywhere showing examples of using the --texinfo option to splice LaTeX code into the file before running the LaTeX file to create a pdf.   How should I properly use the texify command?  Or is there another way to splice in  \pagenumbering{gobble} before running texify? Changing order of features in shapefile I just can't find a decent (and free) one. What can I use? find and print file path, without filename How do I verify a PGP signature? What GUI (no command line) software or websites can I use to verify a PGP signature?  If I have a message like this  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  Because anyone can claim to be me. There's no validation of the user name or email address when someone posts a comment. While I do try to remove imposters, some may slip through. By signing my comments using this technique, anyone can independently verify that I was the author of the message by validating the signature. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)  iD8DBQFFxqRFCMEe9B/8oqERAqA2AJ91Tx4RziVzY4eR4Ms4MFsKAMqOoQCgg7y6 e5AJIRuLUIUikjNWQIW63QE= =aAhr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----   How can I verify the message against the public key to get the same signature back?  This  does not allow me to do that. Why does camera this tracking fail completely even when the solution value is very low? How to take the gradient of the quadratic form? It's stated that the gradient of:  $$\frac{1}{2}x^TAx - b^Tx +c$$  is   $$\frac{1}{2}A^Tx + \frac{1}{2}Ax - b$$  How do you grind out this equation? Or specifically, how do you get from $x^TAx$ to $A^Tx + Ax$? Can we get an alternative to the "That solved my problem!" button that doesn't make the presumption that it solved my problem? I.e. "Yes, that's the problem I have."  In some cases, SE (et. al.) answer something, but the answer really doesn't solve it, it was a "cop-out" -- a "we know there's a problem, but there's currently no fix or workaround". Can we get a button that indicates that "Yes, I acknowledge I have that same problem, and I may have even tried those solutions, but it's not solved by any means." button or something?  I get the purpose of it - make it more friendly and easier to remove duplicates, but I refuse to say "That solved my problem!" if I still have a problem (mostly on principle). I'd rather have a "Ah yes, that's my issue! But, it seems like there's no actual solution there."  As an example: