Which preposition is appropriate? On, with or to?    Stay updated with/on our Facebook page Stay connected to/on/with our Facebook page Stay updated on the go on/with our Facebook page Stay connected on the go to/on/with our Facebook page.
I have seen both usages.    Stay tuned on our Facebook page to know more  Stay tuned to our Facebook page to know more    But don’t know which one is more appropriate. Please help me figure it out. Thanks
Multiple "order by" in LINQ I've been having a lot of problems trying to figure out how to use scanf().  It seems to work fine with integers, being fairly straight forward scanf("%d", &amp;i).  Where I am running into issues is using scanf() in loops trying to read input.  For example:  do {   printf("counter: %d: ", counter);   scanf("%c %c%d", &amp;command, &amp;prefix, &amp;input); } while (command != 'q');    When I enter in a validly structured input like c P101, it seems to loop again before prompting me.  This seems to happen even with a single:  scanf("%c", &amp;c)    in a while loop.  It'll do the loop twice before prompting me again.  What is making it loop twice, and how do I stop it? When I enter in less amount of input that programmatically wouldn't have another character or number such as q, pressing enter seems to prompt me to enter more.  How do I get scanf() to process both single and double character entries? I see this a lot, someone in a category of people attempts to shut down anyone with an opinion that is not from the same category. For example, people without children weighing in on parenting; the parent may say something like "well, since you don't have kids and I do, my position is of more validity than yours."  Another example: a drug user (of some kind) telling someone who has never done drugs and does not care to, "until you tried it, you have no right to judge me."  People frequently try to limit the consideration on opinions to those in their same group, while it is perfectly reasonable that the non-drug user, especially if they are a chemist or well read on the subject, may have an equally valid opinion, or even more valid. In fact some might even say that someone NOT in the category has a better chance of being objective and seeing the forest for the trees.  So what is the fallacy of trying to shut down opinions when the source of the opinion is not someone who has personally had the experience under discussion? Find duplicate files Is it possible to find duplicate files on my disk which are bit to bit identical but have different file-names? How do I uninstall Pandoc in Ubuntu 19.10 (and install most recent version) I have an old version of Pandoc installed, but I'd like to install the latest version of Pandoc.   To begin I've run the following to get rid of the old version:  sudo apt-get autoremove --purge pandoc  But when I check that everything is uninstalled by running: pandoc --version Then pandoc 2.2.3.2 pops up.  I can't seem to get rid of this old version of pandoc so that I can install a new one.  Could you advise me on how I can get rid of the old version and install the new one please. What evidence is there that 'to' belongs to any particular part of speech? Reopen note:  There is a quite finite and modest amount of evidence in the literature about this issue, which members can record here as they see fit. Less than there is for example about what a noun is or what a verb is, or how to tell what the Subject of a sentence is. It's a simple question, that people need to be able to get answered on a site such as this. It is of continuing interest as more recent questions such as  attest to. The fact that people disagree about the outcome of the evidence does not mean that there is too much evidence to be documented. Quite the reverse. They disagree because there is relatively little evidence altogether. However, it is seriously interesting evidence.   The question   What part of speech is to as in:   I need to know. To err is human, to forgive divine. What am I to do?   This question is not really about the difference in meaning between the examples. It is a question about what grammatical or syntactic reasons we have to classify this item as a particular part of speech. If arguing that it is 'its own part of speech', I'd like to know what grammatical - but not historical - reasons you have for your claim.   Just to clarify, I'm not asking about what assignment any particular authority or publication gives it. I'm interested to know the reasons why. Your own personal insights are also very welcome.  If you're a grammar anorak - like me - then you may want a list of the contenders out there from other grammarians. In no particular order:   preposition subordinator non-finite auxiliary verb modal verb inflectional element   Can you help? explicit formula for recurrence relation $a_{n+1}=2a_n+\frac{1}{a_n}$ For $n\in\mathbb N$, $$a_{n+1}=2a_n+\frac{1}{a_n},\quad a_1=1. $$ Can any one give an explicit formula for all $a_n$? If such an explicit general formula doesn't exist, please explain it. I've tried to figure out the $n$-iterated function $f^{(n)}$ where $f(x)=2x+1/x$ or even $f(\tan(t))$. But in either cases, I failed.Since the recurrence isn't linear nor homogeneous,the generating function method doesn't apply here. What's recommended for the number of users to use in qualitative and quantitative testing? Prevent execution of parent event handler I want to learn more about hopf algebras but I am having trouble finding a down to earth introduction to the subject with lots of motivation and examples. My algebra knowledge ranges from Dummit and Foote, Atiyah-Macdonald commutative algebra, and Hartshorne level algebraic geometry.  What are good places to look at for a hopf algebra beginner? My main motivation is for studying groupoid schemes from an algebraic point of view. Proof of an equality involving cosine $\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 + \cdots + \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}}}\ =\ 2\cos (\pi/2^{n+1})$ so I stumbled upon this equation/formula, and I have no idea how to prove it. I don't know how should I approach it: $$ \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 + \cdots + \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{\vphantom{\large A}2\,}\,}\,}\,}\ =\ 2\cos\left(\vphantom{\Large A}\pi \over 2^{n + 1}\right) $$  where $n\in\mathbb N$ and the square root sign appears $n$-times.  I thought about using sequences and limits, to express the LHS as a recurrence relation but I didn't get anywhere.  edit: Solved, thanks for your answers and comments. I know there's some JAVA_OPTS to set to remotely debug a Java program.  What are they and what do they mean ? Links in [link text][number] format don't work properly if they follow a tag using the new [tag:tagName] format. Here's the result of [tag:python] [gold badge page][1]:      [gold badge page]   Putting the tag inside the link is worse. Here's the result of [[meta-tag:bug] some text][2], where [2] is google.com:        The part of the link outside the tag just disappears silently.  EDIT: To be more precise, the entire link to [2] disappears. The markup that is produced contains (invalid) nested anchor tags, as shown here from Firefox's "View Source":  &lt;a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="/questions/tagged/bug" class="post-tag required-tag" title="show questions tagged 'bug'" rel="tag"&gt;bug&lt;/a&gt; some text&lt;/a&gt;   So the tag is still a link, but it is a link to the tag page, which is the behavior it would have if the link to [2] didn't exist at all. The user's desired behavior in this case is... ambiguous, to be charitable.  EDIT 2: I briefly included markup from Firebug here, but it turned out to be irrelevant. It has now been removed to improve readability. See  if you're interested. Placing however at the start of a sentence vs placing it in the middle of a sentence? Basically, what's the difference between this:     However, it didn't mean that I didn't have the potential to become a   rock star.   and this?     It didn't mean, however, that I didn't have the potential to become a   rock star.   Or does it mean exactly the same thing? How can I pass a Parameter via Query String to populate a lookup field on a New Item Form/DVWP? When abstract logic circuits get translated to the electrical equivilant, how are conversions from 0 to 1 handled? I've searched around and there's lots of good information out there, but I'm a bit of a n00b when it comes to the precise meanings of words like current, voltage, amplify, resistor, diode etc. So what at first presents itself as a simple explanation quickly turns into a wikipedia tabfest of ever increasing complexity. With that in mind please forgive my probably inaccurate use of these terms in this post.  The basic problem for me is that gates on a logic circuit appear to be creating power from nothing, which is impossible. For example imagine two NOT gates connected in sequence: To my uninitiated mind what seems to be happening is that the first NOT gate cuts the power to the second NOT gate, which responds by magically conjuring new power out of thin air and sending it on it's way. The only explanation I can come up with feels a bit redundant and absurd (That every single gate on the diagram is implied to be directly connected to a power source)  The closest I've come to an answer is something to do with changing the "signal" from "high" to "low" but again, I'm not familiar enough with the language. It still suffers from the same problem, if you've got a low signal how is it that a NOT gate can turn it into a high one without directly drawing on a power source?  To wrap up and present the question in all it's rookie glory: How do logic gates physically convert 0 to 1 without violating the law of conservation of energy? Singular or plural "set"? Read-only file system Examples:        Data can be imported to and exported from the application.    Data can be imported and exported from the application.   Data can be imported to the application and exported from it.                  The manager defined the products that should be added to and removed from the store.   The manager defined the products that should be added and removed from the store.   The manager defined the products that should be added to the store and removed from it.      I assume that the third sentence is correct in my examples. My question is whether the two other sentences are correct. Infinitely many primes of the type 5 mod 6. Problem: Prove that there are infinitely many primes of the type 5 mod 6.  My professor did the problem and the proof was horribly long. Can someone show me a shorter version of the proof of this problem.