I'm finding that when I use find's -or operator in combination with -exec, I don't get the result I expect. When searching for .cpp and .h files, the command works as expected if I don't use -exec:  find . -name '*.cpp' -or -name '*.h' ./file1.cpp ./file1.h ./file2.cpp ./file2.h   However, when I use -exec, only the .h files seem to be passed:  find . -name '*.cpp' -or -name '*.h' -exec echo '{}' \; ./file1.h ./file2.h   It works fine when I use the more generalized approach for returning the result:  echo $(find . -name '*.cpp' -or -name '*.h') ./file1.cpp ./file1.h ./file2.cpp ./file2.h   However, I'd like to know what I'm doing wrong with -exec, as it's often more convenient. I'm using Mac OSX 10.9, but the same issue occurs in a Cygwin terminal. What's going wrong here? How can I make -exec work the way I want?
When I'm using  find . -type f -name "*.htm*" -o -name "*.js*" -o -name "*.txt"  it finds all the types of file. But when I add -exec at the end:  find . -type f -name "*.htm*" -o -name "*.js*" -o -name "*.txt" -exec sh -c 'echo "$0"' {} \;  it seems it only prints .txt files. What am I doing wrong?  Note: using MINGW (Git Bash)
PWM complementary square output waveforms PWM channels in certain microcontrollers such as the SAM3X8E have two complementary square output waveforms, PWMH and PWML, per channel. What is the purpose of having two waves that are the inverses of each other? Stack Overflow, Stack Exchange, Area 51: What's the difference in a nutshell? Stack Overflow, Stack Exchange, Area 51: What's the difference in a nutshell? I've read the faq's and they all seem to be the same to me - Just Q &amp; A on a variety of topics.  What's the difference in a nutshell? If I have a software engineering question, which site is best for me to use? Infinite series $\sum _{n=2}^{\infty } \frac{1}{n \log (n)}$ How do I easily switch between windows rather than applications in GNOME Shell? Wrong place for hyperref link in scaled tikz picture I have a TikZ picture with a node containing a minipage with an itemize environment; each item is a hyperref to other sections of the document.   When scaling the image (for example with \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.7, transform shape] I've a strange behavior: links in itemize are not in the right place: they present a somewhat vertical offset, as if they don't scale as the rest of image.   Here the MWE:  \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage[pdftex]{hyperref} \begin{document}  Here something interesting\label{text:interesting-one} \newpage  Here something interesting, too\label{text:interesting-two} \newpage  and here there are very very interesting stuff\label{text:interesting-three} \newpage  \newpage Now the problem: links rectangles have some offset, making links unusable in case of long itemize  \begin{figure}[htb] \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.7, transform shape] \node at (0,0) (mynode) { \begin{minipage}{4cm} \begin{itemize} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-one]{First link} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-two]{Second link} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-three]{Third link} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-one]{First link again} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-two]{Second link again} \item \hyperref[text:interesting-three]{Third link again} \end{itemize} \end{minipage} }; \end{tikzpicture} \end{figure} \end{document}   And here a snapshot of the problem    Note: This is evident using the default settings of hyperref package, which draws the red rectangle around links, but it took me some time to found it when only the text is coloured, i.e. when using \usepackage[linkcolor=blue,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} How do I prevent and/or handle a StackOverflowException? I would like to either prevent or handle a StackOverflowException that I am getting from a call to the XslCompiledTransform.Transform method within an Xsl Editor I am writing. The problem seems to be that the user can write an Xsl script that is infinitely recursive, and it just blows up on the call to the Transform method.  (That is, the problem is not just the typical programmatic error, which is usually the cause of such an exception.)  Is there a way to detect and/or limit how many recursions are allowed?  Or any other ideas to keep this code from just blowing up on me? How to add a space between a string for every 5th letter? Noun for "person with intermediate skill" I'm looking for the noun form of "person with intermediate skill". For example, in the context of a particular activity, "person with no skill" might be designated a novice, and "person with much skill" might be designated an expert. However I know of no such word in between these two extremes.   My only thought is amateur, which has a distinct meaning from describing level of skill, although skill level can often be inferred. I'm looking for a better solution.  EDIT: due to the attention this question has received, I'll try to offer some clarification in order to reduce repeat questions.   "Journeyman" would certainly not work. I am a software developer by profession. However the word I'm looking for should hopefully be profession-agnostic. I am trying to designate the skill level of the person that some learning material might be appropriate for. The word that I'm looking for follows the preposition "for".   For Beginners  For [word for intermediate-skilled person] For Experts  Sorry, but even after all the great answers, I'm still learning towards "amateur" even though it is technically incorrect. Also, the word should not be so esoteric that only people with English degrees know what it means. Keep the ideas coming! The Windows Domain I manage has hundreds of computer names which I don't recognise and I'd like to remove old ones which aren't in use before trying to track down the misnamed ones.  Is there someway to see when the last time a machine logged onto the network? Either via dhcpd or a user login event or something else. I'm looking for the title of a Sci-Fi story (probably pre-1990) where a group is sent off into deep space and I believe unbeknownst to them it's a one-way journey.  In the course of the journey they all become very intelligent, they make psychoactive drugs from the plants on board, I recall that they discovered it's a one-way journey to test the affects of space travel, and they redesign/refit their engines and return to Earth.  Lame recall, sorry, that's all I got. Any help appreciated. Create a Collection inside another Collection with python How to create a Collection inside another existing Collection with Python? How to sanity check a date in Java I find it curious that the most obvious way to create Date objects in Java has been deprecated and appears to have been "substituted" with a not so obvious to use lenient calendar.  How do you check that a date, given as a combination of day, month, and year, is a valid date?  For instance, 2008-02-31 (as in yyyy-mm-dd) would be an invalid date. I have heard several times that some mathematician has given another and more rigorous for an established theorem, but I don't know what does it really mean and what differences makes it to be more 'rigorous'. My understanding of a proof is that a proof is some explanation to convincing others that a statement is true. If some proof is not rigorous, does it mean that while the proof is acceptable for many but it is not for everybody? If so, the proof is not correct since it going to be rejected by some people and it is not a proof at all. Or, does rigorous mean it uses more advanced tools? If so, why not any alternative (but simpler) proof is also acceptable as rigorous (which is more 'valuable' as well since it's simpler!)?   Saying those limited insight of mine, my questions are:   $1-$ What does rigorous proof mean, in general definition?  $2-$ In order to understand your answers, as an example I am re-writing three of the proofs for the compactness of the torus. Which of the following proofs are most rigorous, 'normal' and least rigorous; and why so?    Theorem: The torus $T^2$ is compact.  First proof: The torus is homeomorphic to the product space $S^1 \times S^1$. The circle $S^1$ is compact. Therefore the torus is the product of two compact spaces, and thus it is compact.   Second proof: The torus $T$ is the subspace of $\mathbb{R}^3$ obtained by rotating a circle about the $z$-axis. The torus is closed since given any point in its complement, there is an open ball of sufficiently small radius centered at that point and disjoint from the torus. Also, the torus is bounded since it is contained in the ball of radius $4$ centered at the origin. Since the torus is closed and bounded in $\mathbb{R}^3$, it is compact.   Third proof: The torus is homeomorphic to a space obtained as a quotient  space of the square by identifying opposite edges. The square is a closed and  bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^3$ and therefore is compact. Furthermore, a quotient map on the square is a continuous function, and the image of a compact space under a continuous function is compact. Therefore the torus is compact.   Thanks a lot for your guidance. Proof that a Combination is an integer How to show that $x^4+1$ is irreducible in $\mathbb Z[x]$ but it is reducible modulo every prime $p$?   For example I know that $x^4+1=(x+1)^4\bmod 2$. Also $\bmod 3$ we have that $0,1,2$ are not solutions of $x^4+1=0$ then if it is reducible the factors are of degree $2$. This gives that $x^4+1=(x^2+ax+b)(x^2+cx+d)$ and solving this system of equations $\bmod 3$  gives that $x^4+1=(x^2+x+2) (x^2+2x+2) \pmod 3$. But is there a simpler method to factor $x^4+1$ modulo a prime $p$? Why too many capacitors in parallel for Vdd supply net? Can't we just add all to replace with one big capacitor? Lens upgrade paths (sub $1000) for the EF-S 18-55mm IS kit lens for Canon APS-C cameras I'm trying to find an alternative to the standard tombstone qed symbol for more informal papers. I initially thought of an empty square with Pub written inside, but what would actually be better would be a small beer mug symbol. (much like the one found in this set of icons )  Unfortunately there doesn't seem to such a symbol in the comprehensive latex symbol list (although many funny symbols can be found there). Has anyone thought about this? Is there any quick-and-dirty solution? How to raise a complex number to the power of another complex number? How do I calculate the outcome of taking one complex number to the power of another, ie  $\displaystyle {(a + bi)}^{(c + di)}$? \overline outside of math mode If I want to draw an overline over some text, not an equation, how can I do it? \overline seems to only work in math mode, and when used outside of math mode, it automatically says "Missing $ inserted".