According to the "list verse" time gets to a pause when someone or something travels at the speed of light. But a question still lies in my mind, if time always travels forward and does not stop at any point then how come it gets to a pause with respect to a body travelling at speed of light?
I read with interest about Einstein's Theory of Relativity and his proposition about the speed of light being the universal speed limit.    So, if I were to travel in a spacecraft at (practically) the speed of light, would I freeze and stop moving?  Would the universe around me freeze and stop moving?  Who would the time stop for?
If random variables are drawn from an identical distribution, why doesn't this guarantee they are independent? I have too many sections in my presentation such that the left-hand-side navigation bar is full and only shows the first sections in Fig. 2, initial situation in Fig. 1.  Pseudocode    clean the left-hand-hand side navigation bar when exceed the threshold and start a new one there when on sufficient page  this feature occurs with Beamer Berkeley appendix so it is possible also with the main document   Code which problem shown in Fig. 2   \documentclass{beamer} \usetheme{Berkeley}  \logo{\includegraphics{logo.png}} \usepackage{hyperref} % https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/346486/13173 \newenvironment{slide}[1] {\begin{frame}[environment=slide,allowframebreaks] \frametitle{\insertsection-#1} } {\end{frame}} % fragile only if code % allowframebreaks not by default   \begin{document}  \title{Sensory system. Primary sensory modalities. Cortical modalities. Kinds of sensory disturbances. Spinal cord disorders. Spinal cord transverse and partial lesion. Cauda equina damage.} \author{Leo}  \section{Cortical modalities} \begin{slide}{basics}      More refined aspects of sensation ... \end{slide}  \section{Cortical modalities} \begin{slide}{basics}      More refined aspects of sensation ... \end{slide}  \section{Cortical modalities 2} \begin{slide}{basics}      More refined aspects of sensation ... \end{slide}  \section{Cortical modalities 3} \begin{slide}{basics}      More refined aspects of sensation ... \end{slide}  \section{Cortical modalities 4} \begin{slide}{basics}      More refined aspects of sensation ... \end{slide}  \end{document}   Fig. 1 Situation at the first page,  Fig. 2 Situation at Section 6 wheere the navbar has not changed,  Fig. 3 Samcarter's answer output + one slide addition but without \part{} - fails on sufficient page count       Output: the left-hand-side navigation bar is not refreshed when the amount of sections exceed its capacity on suffcient enough page     Testing Samcarter's proposal  I include one slide before Samcarter's body so I get the wrong output in Fig. 3.  Solution: Eventually correct output by just adding \part{} in the place where the new navbar is wanted.   TeXLive: 2016 OS: Debian 8.7 Dirichlet's problem in the unit disk is to construct the harmonic function from the given continuous function on the boundary circle. It is solved by the convolution with the Poisson kernel, and we know that the constructed function has uniform limit which is the given continuous function as $r\to 1$, and we can complexify the solution by taking the Schwarz integral formula. Now (in this very particular case) does the imaginary part has a uniform limit? If it does, why don't we prove the uniqueness of the solution by a simple application of the Cauchy integral formula? Here is the proof that I reckon to be reasonable(which is what I expose here to be criticised)  We construct the Schwarz integral, or $\frac{1}{2\pi}\int _{0}^{2\pi}\frac{\exp(it)+z}{\exp{(it)}-z}u(\exp{(it)})\mathrm{d}t$. This function is an analytic function in the interior unit disk, and is continuous in the closed unit disk(its closure). Let this analytic function denoted by $f$, and another analytic function that has the same uniform limit function on the circle be $v$. Then $u-v$ is an complex analytic function in the interior of the unit disk, continuous on the closure, with boundary value identically zero. An application of Cauchy's integral formula gives rise to the conclusion that $u-v$ in identically zero on the entire disk.   Another question being if the boundary function has finite jump discontinuities, what is the behaviour of the convolution with the Poisson kernel near the discontinuous points? I have a contact in a generic sObject in apex and while I'm able to easily get detail field values using   sObject.get('MyContactField__c')  I'm not able to get fields off the related parent object, and I'm sure the related field is in memory, based on the debug logs. This returns a runtime error:  sObject.get('Account.MyAccountField__c')  with the error     Invalid field Account.MyAccountField__c' for Contact   How do I get a field value off of a parent on a generic sObject? Pivot rows into multiple columns How to compare the differences between two PDF files on Windows? Speed of light travel I have just started special theory of relativity. The limiting speed known as speed of light fascinated me most. I asked my teacher:      Consider two massless objects moving in the same direction at the speed of light. What would be their relative velocity w.r.t each other?   My teacher tells me that their relative velocity would be zero. But then the speed of light is universal constant regardless of the motion of its frame of reference, so shouldn't their relative velocity be $c$? What is their relative velocity and how? Do objects moving at the speed of light obey law of addition of velocities? Can the expression $\sqrt{n} + \sqrt{m}$ be rational if neither $n,m \in \mathbb{N}$ are perfect squares? It doesn't seem likely, the only way that could happen is if for example $\sqrt{m} = a-\sqrt{n}, \ \ a \in \mathbb{Q}$, which I don't think is possible, but how to show it? Does an electrolytic capacitor degrade each time it receives reverse voltage? How to display alt text for an image in chrome Leg bisectors in a trapezoid and angle equality Let $PQRS$ be a trapezoid. The bisectors of legs $PS$ and $QR$ intersect the opposite legs at $M$ and $N$ so that triangles $PMS$ and $QNR$ are formed.  Prove that $\measuredangle PMS= \measuredangle QNR$.  The question may seem easy but I fail to move on, playing with angles didn't help. I'd appreciate some hint from somebody with an eye for geometry and triangles. $E$ is a measurable set of finite measure and $1 \le p_{1} &lt; p_{2} &lt; \infty$. Consider the linear space $L^{p_{2}}(E)$ normed by $||.||_{p_{1}}$. Is this space Banach? Step to reproduce  Answer a question; Answer gets accepted or upvoted; Receive notification in the app; Change the title of the question; Notification is duplicated with updated title.  Expected behavior When going into notifcations you should see only one entry for that reputation event. Actual behavior You get two notification entries. In the screen notice the two entries for the same question, the one related to EF. After answering I have changed the name to make it more searchable for future questions and i've noticed it.      App Version: 1.6.1.2 Device: iPhone 6s OS Version: Version 10.1.1 (Build 14B100) How many connected components does $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb R)$ have? I've noticed that $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb R)$ is not a connected space, because if it were $\det(\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb R))$ (where $\det$ is the function ascribing to each $n\times n$ matrix its determinant) would be a connected space too, since $\det$ is a continuous function. But $\det(\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb R))=\mathbb R\setminus\{0\},$ so not connected.  I started thinking if I could prove that $\det^{-1}((-\infty,0))$ and $\det^{-1}((0,\infty))$ are connected. But I don't know how to prove that. I'm reading my notes from the topology course I took last year and I see nothing about proving connectedness... After the recent "Look and Feel" Apple vs Samsung lawsuits, I've been wondering to what extent this might affect websites/webapps that offer functionality similar to other existing sites.  So what exactly would one have to be wary of to make sure they don't step on the toes of a big corporation?  I could see carbon copying a companies website/app (especially if it's a very distinctive product) being a bad practice that could get you some backlash, especially blatantly ripping off iconic terminology, but how similar is too similar?  Does the ten-foot rule apply to the web?     “If a reasonable person could not, at ten feet, tell the difference between two competitive products, then there was cause to believe an infringement was occurring.”   Or is there a separate legal precedent associated with the web?  And then where does feel, which is essentially the common term for UX, come in.  Can you patent the way a website "feels", as in the flow, organization and functionality associated.  I understand that you can't patent basic elements like radio buttons, but what about the layout and look of a large number of those elements used in combination to complete a certain action/s?    I know that is still a bit of a Sword of Damocles for online retailers.  Where is the line drawn for website/webapp copyright infringement?  Or is there even a line drawn yet? have already been created through .  have already completed their beta stage and are waiting for launch.  are in public beta stage.  are in commitment phase in   proposals are listed in   Now it is really confusing to find a suitable site to ask a question. As an example - I host a blog using . Now I have a question about this hosting. I want to post it in a . Where will I post? I have 2 options available now.     Are developers trying anything to solve this confusing matter? Consider a rocket in deep space with no external forces. Using the formula for linear kinetic energy $$\text{KE} = mv^2/2$$ we find that adding $100\ \text{m/s}$ while initially travelling at $1000\ \text{m/s}$ will add a great deal more energy to the ship than adding $100 \ \text{m/s}$ while initially at rest: $$(1100^2 - 1000^2) \frac{m}{2} \gg (100^2) \frac{m}{2}.$$ In both cases, the $\Delta v$ is the same, and is dependent on the mass of fuel used, hence the same mass and number of molecules is used in the combustion process to obtain this $\Delta v$. So I'd wager the same quantity of chemical energy is converted to kinetic energy, yet I'm left with this seemingly unexplained $200,000\ \text{J/kg}$ more energy, and I'm clueless as to where it could have come from. I have Ubuntu 18.04 LTS installed. I inserted USB-flash to my laptop. It was automounted to /media/username/DISKLABEL and opened in Nautilus. I can read and write objects to it. How can I access it from the application, which is installed as Snap? I tried snaps of the following applications such as gedit, arduino-mhall119, organize-my-files. All them show me errors if I navigate to /media folder:    Could not read the contents of Media Error opening the directory of '/media': permission denied  Output of active Snap  is below: $ snap interfaces  | grep -v &quot;.*-$&quot; Slot                             Plug :browser-support                 organize-my-files :core-support                    core:core-support-plug :cups-control                    gedit :desktop                         gedit,organize-my-files :desktop-legacy                  gedit,organize-my-files :gsettings                       gedit,organize-my-files :home                            arduino-mhall119,gedit,organize-my-files :network                         arduino-mhall119,gedit,organize-my-files,pulsemixer :opengl                          organize-my-files :pulseaudio                      organize-my-files,pulsemixer :unity7                          arduino-mhall119,gedit,organize-my-files :wayland                         gedit :x11                             arduino-mhall119,organize-my-files,pulsemixer gnome-3-26-1604:gnome-3-26-1604  gedit gtk-common-themes:gtk3-themes    gedit gtk-common-themes:icon-themes    gedit gtk-common-themes:sound-themes   gedit -                                arduino-mhall119:serial-port -                                gedit:avahi-observe -                                gedit:mount-observe  Updates:  connecting mount-observe to Gedit with snap connect gedit:mount-observe does not help. it seems that we need special Snap with support of  interface. How to exceed left margin with longtable I'm trying to make a longtable that is wider than the textwidth at a certain moment. I've tried different things always ending up with a different problem:  First possibility: If I use the adjustwidth environment the longtabu does not align correctly. The left margin stays fixed and the right margin gets out of the page. This in contrast, if I do the exact same thing to make a tabu (instead of longtabu), it works perfectly. I think using the adjustwidth is the best way to go, but I can't manage to get it working.  Second possibility: I've found a solution using the fullwidth package. That package does the trick on small longtables, but freezes when I'm trying to do it on my big longtable. The command \setlength\LTleft{-2cm} didn't work as well.  The final option I tried was to use geometry. But that changes the margin of the whole page thus making a page break which I'm not interested in. The code I used for this was  \newgeometry{left=1.2cm} \begin{longtable} long table stuff \end{longtable} \restoregeometry   Here's an example of what I want contra what I get  \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage{chngpage} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{tabu}  \begin{document} \section{This is the original textwidth.} \lipsum[1]  \section{This is the width I need for my longtabu} \begin{adjustwidth}{-1in}{-1in} \begin{tabu} to \linewidth {*{13}{|X[l]} |} 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ \end{tabu} \end{adjustwidth}  \section{This is what happens} \begin{adjustwidth}{-1in}{-1in} \begin{longtabu} to \linewidth {*{13}{|X[l]} |} 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ 01 &amp; 02 &amp; 03 &amp; 04 &amp; 05 &amp; 06 &amp; 07 &amp; 08 &amp; 09 &amp; 10 &amp; 11 &amp; 12 &amp; 13 \\ \end{longtabu} \end{adjustwidth}  \end{document} Can I see a list of gyms I left a pokemon at?