How to save an animation as a video I am quite new to blender and am trying to save this small animation I made, I know you can view the rendered animation by pressing CTRL+F12 but how do I save this as a video? Furthermore, when I tried to do it last time and found 400+ images in a blender folder. I have used a gif program to convert these 400+ images into a gif and turned that gif into a video, but is there a directer and more effective way?
How to render an animation as video in Blender? Yesterday I was working on a simple animation, an animated logo.   Here is an image of the progress:    I already have the animation working and everything is okay with the project, but I can't figure out how I can render the animation and turn it into an AVI format video.  How do I render an animation in Blender?
Another question I am struggling with:  Let $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be defined in a neighborhood of $a$ (except maybe $a$ itself) and suppose that, $\lim_{x \rightarrow a}\left(f(x)+\dfrac{1}{\left|f(x)\right|}\right)=0$. Find $\lim_{x \rightarrow a}f(x)$, and prove by definition, that this is indeed the limit.    Thank you all for your answers!!  But.. How can I prove by definition that this is indeed the limit? take $\epsilon&gt;0$, I have to show that there exists a $\delta&gt;0$ such that, $|x-a| \leq \delta$ implies $|f(x)+1| \leq \epsilon$. now, I do know that there exists an $\delta_1&gt;0$, such that $|f(x)+\frac{1}{|f(x)|}|&lt; \epsilon$.Or, $\frac{\epsilon}{k}$ for some constant $k$ But, how can I continue from there? Is there anything in the physics that enforces the wave function to be $C^2$? Are weak solutions to the Schroedinger equation physical? I am reading the beginning chapters of Griffiths and he doesn't mention anything. Finding Stack Overflow/Exchange users based on geographic area? Find hypotenuse given acute angle bisectors In a right triangle $ABC$ (right-angled at $B$), $D$ and $E$ are points of $\overline{AB}$ and $\overline{BC}$ respectively such that $\overline{CD}$ and $\overline{AE}$ are the angle bisectors of the acute angles of the triangle. Given that $AE=9$ and $CD=8\sqrt{2}$, find the length of the hypotenuse $\overline{AC}$. According to some source or other (I forget which now) it is theoretically impossible for bumblebees to fly by virtue of their size/bulk/aerodynamic properties. Is this old adage apocraphyal or true? And if its true, how come they do fly? Prove that the point of intersection of the diagonals of the trapezium lies on the line passing through the mid-points of the parallel sides Prove,by vector method,that the point of intersection of the diagonals of the trapezium lies on the line passing through the mid-points of the parallel sides.    My Attempt: Let the trapezium be $OABC$ and that the O is a origin and the position vectors of $A,B,C$ be $\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}$.Then the equation of $OB$ diagonal is $\vec{r}=\vec{0}+\lambda \vec{b}................(1)$ And equation of $AC$ diagonal is $\vec{r}=\vec{a}+\mu(\vec{c}-\vec{a}).......(2)$ And the equation of the line joining the mid points of $OA$ i.e.$\frac{\vec{a}}{2}$ and $BC$ i.e. $\frac{\vec{b}+\vec{c}}{2}$ is $\vec{r}=\frac{\vec{a}}{2}+t(\frac{\vec{b}+\vec{c}}{2}-\frac{\vec{a}}{2}).........(3)$. Here $\lambda,\mu,t$ are scalars. I do not know how to solve $(1)$ and $(2)$ and put into $(3)$ to prove the desired result. Please help me.Thanks. How to show that this group presentation is isomorphic to dihedral group? The group with the presentation $\langle a, b \mid a^2, b^2, (ab)^4\rangle$ seems like a dihedral group of order 8. But I fail to explain why. Could anyone show me how to prove it? How to install Telegram Let $D$ be an integral domain and let $a^m=b^m$ and $a^n=b^n$ where $m$ and $n$ are relatively prime integers, $a,b \in D$.   How do I show $a=b$? Does $\lim_{n\to \infty} \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} f_n(x) dx\, = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} f(x)\,dx\,$? If $\displaystyle\{f_n(x)\}$ is sequence of continuous function on $\mathbb{R}$ converging uniformly to $f(x)$, then does $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to \infty} \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} f_n(x) dx\, = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} f(x) dx\,$ hold? I know  it holds if we integrate over an interval of the form $[a,b]$ but not sure about improper integral! Given a polynomial over a field, what are the methods to see it is irreducible? Only two comes to my mind now. First is Eisenstein criterion. Another is that if a polynomial is irreducible mod p then it is irreducible. Are there any others? The "Spell Storing" ability of the Shield Guardian says:     To do so, the wearer must cast the spell on the guardian.  The spell has no effect but is stored within the guardian.   This seems to indicate you cannot cast, for instance, Fire Shield on the Guardian, because that has a range of Self.  This seems different than what is intended, as the wording for a ring of spell storing is:     This ring stores spells cast into it, holding them until the attuned   wearer uses them....Any creature can cast a spell of 1st through 5th   level into the ring by touching the ring as the spell is cast.  The spell has no effect, other than to be stored in the   ring.   The use of the word "into," which does not seem to indicate any range, versus the use of the word "on," which seems to mean the guardian is a target of the spell.    Which is the correct interpretation, grammatically, versus what is the RAI? Steps to solve this system of equations: $\sqrt{x}+y=7$, $\sqrt{y}+x=11$ I want to solve this system of equations, I have been out of Maths for a long!!  $$\sqrt{x}+y=7$$  $$\sqrt{y}+x=11$$  Just wondering easiest step to find values for $x$ and $y$ from the above equations? Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL): what can't I do with the Ubuntu application for Microsoft Windows? Deleting comments and review actions cause layout to be broken, AJAX response contains full page It seems that there are many ways to prove the Sylow theorems. I'd like to see a collection of them. Please write down or share links to any you know. In Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Dumbledore teaches DADA. But from the books we always heard about him as of a Transfiguration teacher (say, in Tom Riddle's days). It is stated in the movie that Dumbledore was prohibited to teach DADA by the Ministry, though the limitations seemed to be canceled at the end of the movie together with the removal of his handcuffs (not completely clear about the teaching though). The strange thing is, however, that Dumbledore was a Transfiguration teacher and even the Head of Transfiguration Department in Hogwarts before Newt's days, as we learn from Pottermore:  Under the guidance of her [McGonagall] inspirational Transfiguration teacher, Albus Dumbledore, she had managed to become an Animagus She [McGonagall] sent an owl to Hogwarts, asking whether she might be considered for a teaching post. The owl returned within hours, offering her a job in the Transfiguration department, under Head of Department, Albus Dumbledore.  That is of course if we accept that Minerva McGonagall in the movie is the same Minerva we know. So it seems that he taught Transfiguration, then for some reason switched to DADA and then to Transfiguration again. While it is possible in general, is there any explanation for the reasons? Find the first occurrence/starting index of the sub-array in C# Proving that the Intersection of any Collection of Compact Sets is Compact I was trying to do this problem this way:  Let $\mathcal{B}=\{B_i\}$ be a collection of compact sets. By Heine-Borel, each of the $B_i$'s are closed and bounded. We already know that the intersection of a collection of closed sets is once again closed, so $\cap \mathcal{B}$ is closed.  If I can prove $\cap\mathcal{B}$ is bounded as well, I can use Heine-Borel to say it is compact. So I was not sure how to show it was bounded, but a friend showed me his way of doing it. He did it the following way:  Let $b,a\in\mathbb{R}$ be an upper and lower bound for $B_1$, respectively. Since $\cap\mathcal{B}\subset B_1, a$ is a lower bound for $\cap \mathcal{B}$ and $b$ is an upper bound for $\cap\mathcal{B}$. Therefore, $\cap\mathcal{B}$ is bounded and then by Heine-Borel, it is compact.  My question is on the paragraph right above. I don't understand why what he did means that $a$ and $b$ are lower and upper bounds for $\cap\mathcal{B}.$ Can anyone explain why this is? Thanks. How do I merge two dictionaries in a single expression (taking union of dictionaries)?