I just met this review audit:     Wow, that's difficult to miss. You can see the high score of the answer, as well as the author's rep which is higher than 100k.  However, I remember that the review audits in the Close Votes review queue will "anonymize" the vote count and the author so that it can catch robo-reviewers more easily. More specifically, the vote count is replaced with a 0 instead of the original high score, and the user's name and reputation count is replaced so it is more obscure.  Why isn't this the case for the Low Quality Posts review audits? Shouldn't this be applied as well?
Today I came across an OBVIOUSLY good answer in /review. It had 7 upvotes, contained lists, paragraphs of explanation, and well-applied sample code. It was also moderately long. How does a question like this get flagged for review? I don't really know how the algorithm works.   If this is low-quality then I feel bad about all of my answers.  Here's a  if you care to see it in context. It's not really a huge problem (as Bart's comment emphasizes), but this seems like an extreme outlier in every measurable aspect.
I've tried different ways to install iTunes, but to no avail. I tried with Wine, but it didn't work. Is it possible to have iTunes on Ubuntu? AutoHotkey Equivalent for OS X? Is there an equivalent product/method for AutoHotkey. For those that don't know, its a product that allows you to program your mouse movements and keyboard. This allows me to "macro" certain functions on programs instead of having to do it manually. In the old days they used to call them keyboard stuffers. But that is only half of the solution as I need a "mouse movement" stuffer as well.  Is there such a beast? Is “what’s” a correct short form of “what does”? E.g. “What’s he think?”  Usually ’s is short for “is” so I don’t know. What is object serialization? Why does the speed of light in vacuum have no uncertainty? I could understand that the definition of a second wouldn't have an uncertainty when related to the transition of the Cs atom, so it doesn't have an error because it's an absolute reference and we measure other stuff using the physical definition of a second, like atomic clocks do.  But why doesn't the speed of light have uncertainty? Isn't the speed of light something that's measured physically?  Check out that . Installing Autodesk Maya on Ubuntu is possible, but can be a bit challenging.  Assuming that one already has the required specs and a solid graphics card driver installed, how can it be done? I know the "textbook" estimate of the standard error of a proportion is $SE=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}$, but does this hold up when the data are weighted? The grammaticality of "that don't impress me much" I'd like to know how the sentence "That don't impress me much" sounds to a native English speaker.  The phrase is the title of a song by Shania Twain, and to my eyes it contains a clear error. It is obviously intended, and I want to know what was the effect that the author wanted to obtain.  Other examples that come to mind:   “She's got a ticket to ride, but she don't care” — The Beatles “My love don't cost a thing” — Jennifer Lopez “It don't matter” — Akon “She don't care about me” — heard in the Lost series “It Don't Mean a Thing” — a jazz album title “The Sun Don't Lie” — another album title How can I deduce/identify an app from a notification icon? I'm concerned about an app on my child's phone. I saw an app icon in the notification area that looked strange (Andy Android head, slightly tilted as its icon).  How can I find out what app it is from just having seen that icon in the notification bar? Variance of the distribution of difference scores Can I bake in a convection microwave? I have microwave oven, but I can't bake cakes and cookies in it. So I need an electric oven, but people are suggesting I buy a convection microwave to do both baking and normal microwaving. Will that work? Or do I really need to get an electric oven to bake? Open Windows Terminal as admin with WIN+R I just got this error message for the first time (I was getting this as the response to any request on the SE network for about the last five minutes, until now):     We're sorry...      There are an unusual number of requests coming from this IP address.   To protect our users, we can't process any more requests from this IP   address right now. We'll restore access as quickly as possible, so try   again soon. If you believe you have reached this page in error,   contact us.   As far as I know, I was not spamming SE or participating in DOS attack, and I find it unlikely that any of my office coworkers who share my IP address were doing so either.  Granted, I was pressing F5 a lot. But I've always pressed F5 a lot on SE, and have never gotten this message before. So my question is: Is it possible to get this error message simply by refreshing too much or too often? Or is that message reserved for a truly massive number of requests that are unlikely to be caused by one person refreshing a lot? (In the former case, I can't explain why I've never gotten it before; in the latter case, I can't explain why I just got it now). Why the names Type 1, 2 error? Note: The legacy Skype for Linux application (v4.*) is now discontinued and was removed from Canonical’s partner repositories, so this question and its answers are obsolete. Please refer to  of our .    I am receiving the following message while I am trying to install Skype:  nidhin@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get update nidhin@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install skype Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation:  The following packages have unmet dependencies:  skype : Depends: skype-bin but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages   How can I fix this? Control custom properties How can I add remove and create a callback/event for a custom property using bpy. I have a scene, called scene, and I want to add a custom property named x, defulat value 2 (as intereger), and a callback foo, to run when it is changed. I also need to be able to read the value from it, and delete it. How do I do this? Do you really want to create a new tag? Time Dilation inside a hollow shell Assuming I have a hollow shell with total mass $M$ and radius $r$. On the surface, the gravitational time dilation would be  $$\tau=t \cdot \sqrt{1-\frac{v_{esc}^2}{c^2}}$$  where  $$v_{esc} = \sqrt{\frac{2 \cdot G \cdot M}{r}}$$  but inside the shell there would be no gravitational field (Newton's shell theorem and Birkhoff's theorem).  But still, the escape velocity required to escape to infinity would be the same as on the surface, since inside the shell you could move without any accelerating or decelerating forces acting on you until you reach the surface, from where you would get pulled backwards.  So is the time dilation inside the hollow shell relative to a field free observer at infinity    zero (I assume it's not) or  the same as on the surface (my best guess), or something completely different?   I found some not really duplicate but related threads on the interior of black holes which did not really focus on the math, but I am more behind the calculations in terms of $M$ and $r$. I'm currently reading Marcus' "Number Fields," and I'm having difficulty proving the following result:  Corollary 2.2: Let $m$ be a squarefree integer. The set of algebraic integers in the quadratic field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{m})$ is $$ \left\{ a + b \sqrt{m} : a,b \in \mathbb{Z} \right\} $$ if $m \equiv 2,3 \pmod{4}$; and$$ \left\{ \frac{a+b\sqrt{m}}{2} : a,b \in \mathbb{Z} ~,~ a \equiv b \pmod{2} \right\}$$ when $m \equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. $\square$  It is easy enough to see that the claimed sets do, indeed, consist of algebraic integers. The other half of the proof proceeds something like this: suppose that $\alpha = r + s \sqrt{m}$ is an element of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{m})$. Then $\alpha$ is a root of the polynomial $$ x^2 - 2rx + r^2 - s^2m $$ In particular, this means that $\alpha$ is an algebraic integer if and only if both $2r$ and $r^2 - s^2 m$ are integers. At this point, the proof stops, and says that this implies the result. And therein lies the problem: I don't see how to make the connection. I do know, for example, that if one of $r,s$ is an integer, then the other one must be, too, i.e., either both are integers, or both are not. However, I cannot get any further than that. Can anyone give me a gentle nudge in the right direction? Thank you very much! What is the best way to explain how to choose between "its" and "it's"?