Search Engine with jQuery :contains() I'm working on a project that requires a simple search engine. The idea is not to use plugins like "autocomplete" and "jquery ui" but to exploit the ":contains()" jQuery method.  Now, this function does exactly what I'm talking about.  $('#search').on('keyup',function(){      var v = $(this).val();      $('.element').hide();     $(".element:contains('"+v+"')").show();   });   The problem is, if a term is called "Foo" and I searching for "foo", the search engine do not returns any results... rightly. So I ask you if there is a way to solve this problem... using only jQuery.
Is there a case insensitive jQuery :contains selector? Is there a case insensitive version of the  jQuery selector or should I do the work manually by looping over all elements and comparing their .text() to my string?
Syntax highlighting language hints Do you think it would be worthwhile to provide hints as to what language to use for the syntax highlighting?  Sometimes I find the highlighting on SQL or VB.NET answers is more distracting than helpful; for example:       to pick the two I've been looking at recently. Solve for $x$ in $6x^2-25x+12+\frac{25}{x}+\frac{6}{x^2}=0$ Assume that $A$ is an $n\times n$  real matrix, i.e. $$A^T=-A.$$  Since $\det(A-\lambda I)=\det(A^T-\lambda I)$, $A$ and $A^T$ have the same eigenvalues. On the other hand, $A^T$ and $-A$ also have the same eigenvalues. Thus if $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A$, so is $-\lambda$. If $n$ is odd, $\lambda = 0 $ is an eigenvalue.  A curious search in Google returns  the nonzero eigenvalues of $A$ are all pure imaginary and thus are of the form $iλ_1, −iλ_1, iλ_2, −iλ_2,$ … where each of the $λ_k$ are real.   Here is my question:     How can I prove the fact that "the nonzero eigenvalues of $A$ are all pure imaginary"? Let $X \sim Bin(n,p)$ show that $X/n \nsim Bin()$ Let $X \sim Bin(n,p)$   Part A.  Show that the argument      "Then $X/n \sim Bin()$ with $E[X/n]=p$and $Var[X/n]=pq/n$"    is false.   My book says we can prove this result using a moment generating function. But to me it makes no intuitive sense: We have Bin-distributed RV $X$ and if we rescale it with $1/n$ of course it will be Bin-distributed.  And we know from standard formulas that $E[aX]=aE[X]$ and $Var[aX] = a^2Var[X]$ so I think the argument is correct.   (For full disclosure, the argument we should falsify according to the book is "Let X be a binomial random variable with mean np and variance np(1−p). Show that the ratio X/n also has a binomial distribution with mean p and variance p(1−p)/n." But I think the argument is correct. )    Ok, now I get part A. Here is Part B. Prove it using the moment generating function of $X/n$.   Attempt: I get $$m_X(t)=E[\exp(tX/n)]=(m_X(t))^{1/n}$$ How did the Swooping Evil Venom infused rain affect the magical community? If $a, b, c >0$ prove that $ [(1+a)(1+b)(1+c)]^7 > 7^7a^4b^4c^4 $. I solved it using AM, GM inequalities and reached to $[(1+a)(1+b)(1+c)]^7 &gt; 2^{21}(abc)^\frac72 $ please help how to get $7^7(abc)^4$ in the inequality. Why is oil a better lubricant than water? How come mineral oil is a better lubricant than water, even though water has a lower viscosity?    When two surfaces slide over each other with a gap filled with a fluid, the different layers of the fluid are dragged at different speeds. The very top layer touching the top metal surface will have the same speed as the surface itself, while the bottommost layer is stationary. The speed in the layers between is distributed linearly and there exist friction forces between those layers that slow the movement. Those frictional forces should be reduces however, if a fluid with a lower viscosity is chosen.   How come this is not so?   Does it have to do with water's polarity, so that it sticks to surfaces in a different way than oil? This question came up after reading , in which it is re-iterated (as it has been many times on this site), that investing in the stock market, especially an index fund that tracks the top 100 / 500 companies in a country, basically always has great returns in the long run.  So my question is: Why isn't everybody rich?  If it is so easy (basically invest as heavily as you can in your youth to be rich into middle age and older), why doesn't everyone do this? There would be no need for pensions or any other savings or financial security that way, why even bother investing in assets like property that you have to manage when you can just have an index fund work for you?  I'm guessing that something is being missed here. How was Dumbledore able to defeat Grindelwald, since Grindelwald had the Elder Wand? Save fillable forms An entire function whose real part is bounded must be constant. How can I reset my Ability Points? I'm also curious about being able to reset my points, should I wish to change my ability configuration later.  So far (10h-ish) I've only seen one way, which is a potion sold by Kiera Metz for 1000g. However she's no longer available as a store, due to a story choice, so I'm not sure where else I could buy this potion.  Where might I buy this potion, and is it the only way to reset your ability points? Is there a word or phrase to define several words linked by hyphens, such as in "a sit-back-and-wait-for-it attitude" some more examples:   "And she gave me that aren't-I-just-gorgeous smile." "The I-did-it-my-way approach." "A from-this-day-forward-I-have-no-son scene." How do I eliminate reflection on glass? When I take a picture through a window, I often see a reflection on the glass. I have noticed that this occurs mostly when it is dark or overcast outside or it is especially bright on my side of the glass. How can I stop this? In my game, XP needed to reach the next level is Current Level × Level Threshold.  Given that, how can I get my current level from the total XP ever earned?    For example:  Level Threshold = 50 Current Level = 1   Starting at level 1, I would need (1 × 50) = 50 XP to get to level 2, and so on.  Level 1: 50 XP needed to reach level 2 Level 2: 100 more XP needed to reach level 3 Level 3: 150 more XP needed to reach level 4   In other words, the progression table is as follows:  Level 1: 0 XP to 49 XP Level 2: 50 XP to 149 XP  Level 3: 150 XP to 299 XP Level 4: 300 XP to 499 XP   If I have 300 XP, I'll just reached level 4. How can I calculate that generally? TimedRotatingFileHandler Changing File Name? Attaching event handlers in Visual Basic .NET Force "portrait" orientation mode To my (British) ear, it never sounds correct to say you have a doubt about something.  I expect that doubt to be pluralised, even if there's only one specific thing that I'm doubtful of, in one specific way, so I would always say "I have doubts about something".  Answers to  say that using doubt as a synonym for question is "Indian English". That seems to be the case in  which starts with "I have a doubt on my construction", because the OP really is saying "I have a question" (which he goes on to actually ask). Okay, it should have been a question/doubt about something, not on, but I'm not concerned with that detail here.  But in  the OP says "...there is a doubt that can I use [some construction]". In that case it's not easy to see how the word doubt can be replaced with question.  I don't have a problem with, for example, , because there I interpret it as doubt=uncertainty (a state of mind, syntactically equivalent to words like happiness, agitation, sorrow, etc.). But you certainly can't "have a happiness about something". So my question is...     Is it acceptable today to use singular noun doubt in any contexts where it means something other than state of mental uncertainty? If so, what are those contexts? When you add an image strip to the Video Sequence Editor, it stretches/shrinks your image to fit the full output frame.  How can I add an image at its original resolution?  For example, if I add a 60x60 pixel image, it should appear very small in the final 1080p render.