On the beta , I can "Recommend Deletion" of answers. It currently doesn't do much, just .   To me, deleting a post is pretty serious stuff, so if I "recommend" such an action, I'd like to be able to track the post. I've been doing this by raising "Not an answer" flags, and keeping track of the posts from my Flagging Summary page. Moderators usually handle those flags pretty fast. And seeing if my flags were helpful or not is valuable feedback to me for deciding how to act on future posts.  But, you cannot flag from the Low Quality review queue, and the posts you Recommend Deletion on simply vanish after you click the button and confirm. I understand the beta tool wants to keep things more simple and focused, and probably also reduce the load on moderators. That's great! But we should have a way to track the posts we Recommend Deletion on.  I was thinking it could be shown on activity &gt; reviews, together with the suggested edits:    The red answer link would indicate a deleted answer so we can easily spot them. If I Recommend Deletion, and it's still blue after a while, I go back there and flag it.  Do you think that could work? Or maybe we should just have a regular flag link on the Low Quality Posts task, like in ?    UPDATE  So now the activity tab on my profile is logging more review actions, such as "Close", "Edit" (improve), "Edit" (from low the quality posts task), and "Looks good". But no sign of "Recommend deletion". Will that be added too?
This post is an expansion of  For many graduated sites (eg Physics), moderators do not want to apply the unilateral close vote in all cases--it is better to let some community votes pile on first.  We only use the unilateral in obvious cases then. This renders the CV queue useless to us. If we &quot;skip&quot; something, we can't get back to it. If we say &quot;do not close&quot;, it's removed from the queue and our community can't see it. If we use &quot;close&quot;, we are using a unilateral mod vote--we don't want to do that. What I propose is a set of &quot;next/previous&quot; buttons, that let us navigate the queues, looking for closeable questions, and coming back to the others later. Thoughts? Update and bounty reason Due to the recent Great Flag Overhaul, mods no longer see close flags in the flag queue. Which means that the only way to get to them is via the review queue 1 Shog's solution is ideal in this case; let mods view the close queue as a list. (In fact, a list similar to the old flag queue -- which shows a list of mods who have seen the post and what mod actions have already been taken -- would be great) On Physics, the majority of the flags that we get are VTC flags. And the community isn't always able to close things on their own, so we have to step in. However, powering through the close queue isn't an option; because &quot;skip&quot;ing a post2 leads to it being dumped into the void (I can't get back to it unless I have a link). Extremely inconvenient. Could the workflow here be improved? 1. The /tools listing for posts with outstanding close votes doesn't work because it doesn't list posts which have been flagged but not VTCd 2. which I may want to take a closer look at later; gotta be careful with the binding votes.
So the vending machine tore my $5 in pieces. What now? The vending machine swallowed half of my $5 bill, and the other half remained in my hand. Can I get my $5 back, or is it all lost forever? What's the difference between mobile and desktop processors? I just read about the new Samsung Galaxy Note Edge having a 2.7&nbsp;GHz quad-core processor and 3GB of RAM.  The laptop I bought last year by HP is 4&nbsp;GB of RAM and 2.3&nbsp;GHz quad-core and my iMac is even older and is 2.5&nbsp;GHz i5.  Does this mean that the new Samsung gadget is more powerful than my desktop?  Is the 2.7&nbsp;GHz the same kind of GHz as non-mobile devices (is it scaled up, or compared, etc.)?  Why, in terms of power, do modern computers not have two of those Samsung quad-core processors running in parallel pushing out 5.4&nbsp;GHz processing power for the amount of electrical energy as two Galaxy Note batteries? If $\gcd(a,b)=1$, $\gcd(a,y)=1$ and $\gcd(b,x)=1$ then prove that $ax+by$ is prime to $ab$.  I tried assuming Diophantine Equations for all the relations and representing everything in terms of $a$, but that didn't lead me anywhere. There must be an intuitive and elegant approach right? Add asterisk after labels in enumerate I would like to add an asterisk after certain labels in the enumerate environment. So for example  \documentclass{article} \begin{document}  \begin{enumerate}     \item Kuttel     \item* Daddeldu \end{enumerate}  \end{document}   but without the space between 2. und *. What is the physical explanation for energy transport in simple electrical circuits? Keeping it simple, what is the physics approach to a current in a wire connected to a battery? How does the electric field behave?  I've read somewhere that, contrary to the common conception, electrons don't really flow as water in a hose so, what is really going on there? How is energy transported at the speed of light if electrons don't flow like very fast water? How to wait in bash for several subprocesses to finish and return exit code !=0 when any subprocess ends with code !=0? Why aren't the braces showing I am reading a paper and have questions about the details of the procedure described. I have read other papers by the same team but they don't explain too much about that procedure anyway. I think it might be common, but my supervisor doesn't know it too.  I am stuck and I want to get out of it. As a student working on my master thesis, can I email the contact author for the manuscript cold out, or should I ask someone to contact him for me? I would ask my supervisor but I don't want it to imply that I'm avoid taking initiatives when I could do it on my own. When to use Stateful session bean over Stateless session bean? Does the artificer's Enhanced Weapon stack on top of hexblade's Improved Pact Blade? A positive harmonic function on the punctured plane is constant Programmatically get own phone number in iOS Is there any way to get own phone number by standard APIs from iPhone SDK? Removing internal geometry So in the image below there are two circles, how can I remove the internal vertices between them without messing up the outside shape. I'm working on a gun and this is just a simple way to illustrate the issue I'm dealing with. If I where to go in and delete the internal faces it would leave holes on the outside of the object, is there a fast way to get around this? "To shoot out of cannon into sparrows" In Russian we have idiom/saying "To shoot out of cannon into sparrows" (literal translation) which is used to convey an idea of applying too drastic measures to small problems. I believe there should be some native-English equivalents to this saying. Can you share if there are any? I am getting this error:     SObject row was retrieved via SOQL without querying the requested   field: Contact.Account   Controller:  public class WrapperAccountCtrl {      public List&lt;Account&gt; acclist{get;set;}     public List&lt;Contact&gt; conlist{get;set;}      public List&lt;MyWrapper&gt; wap{get;set;}      public WrapperAccountCtrl()      {         acclist=[Select id,name from Account];          conlist=[Select id,name,AccountID  from contact where AccountID IN:acclist];          system.debug('Size----'+conlist.size());           wap=new List&lt;MyWrapper&gt;();           for(integer i=0;i&lt;acclist.size();i++)          {              wap.add(new MyWrapper(conlist,acclist[i]));          }     }      public class MyWrapper     {          public Account accn{get;set;}          public List&lt;Contact&gt;conrec{get;set;}          public MyWrapper(List&lt;Contact&gt; con,Account acc)         {             accn=acc;             conrec=con;             }     } }   VF Page:  &lt;apex:page controller="WrapperAccountCtrl" sidebar="false"&gt;       &lt;apex:form &gt;          &lt;apex:pageBlock &gt;              &lt;apex:pageBlockTable value="{!conlist}" var="c"&gt;                  &lt;apex:column value="{!c.account.Name}"/&gt;              &lt;/apex:pageBlockTable&gt;          &lt;/apex:pageBlock&gt;      &lt;/apex:form&gt;  &lt;/apex:page&gt; Let $R$ be a ring, where $a^{3} = a$ for all $a\in R$. Prove that $R$ must be a commutative ring. apt-get update only for a specific repository I'm very confused about tenses.  I have examples in two different situations here. Situation 1: I went to New York two months ago and was talking to someone about it.  A. This is the first time I've been to New York. B. That was the first time I'd been to New York.  Which is correct in a daily conversation?  Situation 2: I'm going to New York next month and talking to someone.  A. This will be the first time I've been to New York. B. This is the first time I've been to New York. C. This will be the first time I go to New York.  Which sentence is appropriate?  According to a grammar article I've read before, I think it says that I can use this sentence in both cases:  This is the first time I've been to New York.  But I'm not sure if this is really so. So I'd like to know which tense I should use in each case. Could you explain it? How to use fakeslant as slanted but not italic font with fontspec? Using fontspec with Luatex it is possible to create a fake slant and use that as italic should no italics be around:  \setmainfont[ AutoFakeSlant=0.15 ]             {FontName}   However, also if an italic version exist this faked slant will be used both for \itshape and \slshape. How can I keep using the shipped italic font defined by the ItalicFont= parameter to \setmainfont but use fake slant for \slshape? Intuition of the meaning of homology groups