Will Moore's Law be no longer effective once quantum computers are created? Moore's law states that computer power doubles in every 18 months (more formally: "the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles about every two years."). Statistics suggest that this observation should be correct, but aren't quantum computers much more powerful than just double-powered classical computers? More interesting question is, is there even a way to improve the power of quantum computers?
Does Moore's law apply to quantum computing? Plain and simple. Does  apply to quantum computing, or is it similar but with the numbers adjusted (ex. triples every 2 years). Also, if Moore's law doesn't apply, why do qubits change it?
AngularJS Directives: Change $scope not reflected in UI How to achieve echo cancellation with Pulse Audio? I want to use echo cancellation for my Skype calls and Empathy on Ubuntu 12.10 (pulseaudio 2.1).   Does anyone know how to do that? Consider a partial function $f$ that is defined only for a few values of its domain (my exact use case is $\delta$ transition functions in automata). One can 'complete' it by saying $$g(x)=0\iff f(x) \text{ is not defined.}$$  Is there a symbol to mean "undefined"? Would it be correct, or accurate, to write $\nexists f(x)$? Inequality involving sides of a triangle How can one show that for triangles of sides $a,b,c$ that   $$\frac{a}{b+c}+\frac{b}{c+a}+\frac{c}{a+b} &lt; 2$$  My proof is long winded, which is why I am posting the problem here.   Step 1: let $a=x+y$, $b=y+z$, $c=x+z$, and let $x+y+z=1$ to get   $\frac{1-x}{1+x}+\frac{1-y}{1+y}+\frac{1-z}{1+z}&lt;2$  Step 2: consider the function $f(x)=\frac{1-x}{1+x}$, and note that it is convex on the interval (0,1), so the minimum of   $\frac{1-x}{1+x}+\frac{1-y}{1+y}+\frac{1-z}{1+z}$  is reached when the function takes the extreme points. i.e. $x=y=0, z=1$.    But going back to the fact that this is a triangle, we note that $x=y=0 \implies a=0$ which is not possible, so the inequality is strict. Suppose we have a situation like      A ball of some mass $m$ with some velocity collides with rod hinged at point $A$. Is momentum conserved in this situation? I know that hinge will give impulsive force on rod but that is internal force when we take ball and rod together as a system so that shouldn't stop us using conservation of momentum equation ARMA/GARCH estimation in sequence I have a time series that shows a nonstationary seasonal autoregressive component as well as known heteroshedasticity. In order to model the series, I have fit a seasonal ARIMA model for the mean with the auto.arima model in the forecast package in R and a GARCH model on the residuals of the ARIMA model.   Is the procedure of sequentially estimating ARIMA and GARCH model correct or would it have been better to jointly model the mean and the variance of the series? If this were correct, is there a (possibly R) function to do it? Folland, "Real Analysis", Chapter 5.3, Exercise 36:     Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a separable Banach space and let $\mu$ be   counting measure on $\mathbf{N}$.  Suppose that   $\left\{x_n\right\}_1^\infty$ is a countable dense subset of the unit   ball of $\mathcal{X}$, and define $T \colon L^1(\mu) \to \mathcal{X}$   by $Tf = \sum_1^\infty f(n) x_n$.  (a)  $T$ is bounded.  (b)  $T$ is   surjective.   I have proved (a).  I would like help on (b).  Here are my ideas so far.    Say we want to show $y \in \mathcal{X}$ is in the image of $T$.  Reduce to the case $||y|| = 1$ and let $x_{n_m} \to y$.  My thought is to produce for each $N$ a function $f_N \in L^1(\mu)$ such that $||y - \sum_n^\infty f(n)x_n|| &lt; 1/N$ and also such that the $f_N$ converge in $L^1(\mu)$ to some $f \in L^1(\mu)$.  Then use the continuity of $T$ to conclude $T(f) = y$.    The way I have been setting up my inequalities is as follows. Pick $M_N$ such that for all $m &gt; M_N$, $||y - x_{n_m}|| &lt; 1/N$.  Then I want to define $f_N$ so that $$\sum_n^\infty f_N(n) = \sum_{m &gt; M_N}^\infty f_N(m) = 1, $$ hence $$||y - T(f_N)|| = ||\sum_{m &gt; M_N}^\infty f_N(m) y + \sum_n^\infty f_N(n)x_n|| \leq \sum_{m &gt; M_N}^\infty f_N(m) || y - x_{n_m} || &lt; \frac{1}{N}. $$  Presumably, if the $f_N$ are appropriately chosen, then I can find a dominating function and apply the Dominated Convergence Theorem to finish up.    However, getting all these hypotheses to hold simultaneously has been difficult.  In essence, the difficulty seems to be in requiring that the $f_N$ be "normalized" as well as possess a dominating function.  If this method is feasible, at least it seems to require a bit of analysis to show the desired series all converge.  Perhaps I am missing something cleaner.  If so, a simpler solution would be much appreciated.    -Thanks. The overly simplified explanation I'm giving myself right now is  causes the opposite of what gravity does, that's why the universe is expanding. Now where gravity is a force, why dark energy is "energy"? Why it's not called "Dark Force" instead? I think I must be missing something here. Where do I find the power cells to restore the bunker door in “Ancient armory”? I am trying to find the power cells to access the amor. Yet the placement is unmarked and I thought I would eventually stumble over them clearing the cauldrons.  Yet after clearing three cauldrons (RHO, XI, and Sigma) I still only have the one from the very beginning.  Where do I find all the power cells? Can it hurt to put my GRE score on my resume? Maximum Champion Growth size I was reading about Lulu (new champion) and saw this:     Wild Growth (Ultimate) - Lulu enlarges an ally, knocking enemies away   from them and granting them a large amount of bonus health. For the   next few seconds, that ally gains an aura that slows nearby enemies.   Then I start wondering: what is the max size that a champion reach ? Is there a Maximum size ?  Example: Cho'Gath's Feast +  +  + Wild Growth + Something that make champions grow in size. Cho'Gath will grow every time ? or it will stop at some point ? How to get only time from date-time C# I have this gigantic ugly string: J0000000: Transaction A0001401 started on 8/22/2008 9:49:29 AM J0000010: Project name: E:\foo.pf J0000011: Job name: MBiek Direct Mail Test J0000020: Document 1 - Completed successfully  I'm trying to extract pieces from it using regex. In this case, I want to grab everything after Project Name up to the part where it says J0000011: (the 11 is going to be a different number every time). Here's the regex I've been playing with: Project name:\s+(.*)\s+J[0-9]{7}:  The problem is that it doesn't stop until it hits the J0000020: at the end. How do I make the regex stop at the first occurrence of J[0-9]{7}? A commutative ring is a field iff the only ideals are $(0)$ and $(1)$ if $a,b$ are nilpotent elements of a commutative ring $R$, show that $a+b$ is also nilpotent 14.04 LTS No Dash / Launcher after update through Software Updater The temperature and pressure everywhere inside the Sun reach the critical point to start nuclear reactions - there is no reason for it to take such a long time to complete the reaction process.  Just like a nuclear bomb will complete all the reaction within $10^{-6}$seconds.  Why does most of the hydrogen of the Sun still not react even though it reaches the critical point, and why take stars billions of years to run out of fuel? I recently bought a Minolta film camera and it had some film with it. The film is dated 1991 - 1994. Can I use the film? When Cantor's Intersection theorem won't work with closed sets Give an example to show that Cantor's Intersection Theorem would not be true if compact sets were replaced by closed sets.    Compact set is closed and bounded, so what I'm going to find is something that is closed but not bounded.  By the Cantor theorem, which says that a decreasing sequence of non-empty compact subset will have a non-empty intersection.  What I was trying to approach is how two sets just "touched" and as if they have not bounded, two sets "touched" nothing. But I cant give an example for that MySQL convert date string to Unix timestamp