If electric field inside a conductor is zero then why is there an electric current in a resistor when an emf is applied across it for a long time?
I came across this statement while studying electric currents and I am confused:  "There is no electric field inside a conductor. Hence no current can flow through it".  Is there a fallacy in this statement?  Any help would be appreciated.  The conductor being discussed is ideal. What is the driving force for the current in this case?
I worked, I've worked, I have been working. I need some clarifications Could you help me with these sentences:   I lied to her. (I'm just making a statment)  I've lied to her because the truth would have hurted her.   Second example:   I have been working at Google for 10years. (Meaning I am still working there) I've worked at Google and it was nice.(I don't work anymore) I worked at Google. (Not sure about the difference with the previous one)   I'm learning the different tenses and it isn't so easy for me. Any help would be welcome.  Regards, Ubuntu 20.04 interface font too small after restart, even with high scaling factor When can an autonomous system be written using a Hamiltonian? Subscribers currently in a Journey What ways could you create a data extension that contains all the subscribers (SubscriberKeys) that are currently “in” a Journey (Journey Builder)?  The Journey I would like to do this for is a complex activity with multiple decision branches resulting in multiple possible journey durations. For example; if the customer didn’t open Email1 after 2 days, then send Email2; else Exit Journey. If the customer didn’t open Email2 after 2 days, then send Email3; else Exit Journey. Wait 2 more days, then End Journey. The minimum journey duration for the above example is 2 days, while the maximum is 6 days.  Note that I don’t want a list of subscribers that “entered” a Journey, but a list of the ones that are “currently in” a Journey and have not yet exited. Answer must account for non-standard Journey exits including Unsubscribes/Contact Deletes, etc. Continuity of absolute value of a function Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function. Prove that $\left|f(x)\right|$ is also continuous.  Is it correct to say that, by the reverse triangle inequality, $\left|f(x)-f(c)\right| \geq \left|f(x)\right|-\left|f(c)\right|$ in all cases, so we will always have that for all $\left|x-c\right|&lt;\delta$ implies $\left|f(x)-f(c)\right|\leq \epsilon$?  I am not sure if my solution adequately uses the functional form, since I just used the equation and not my actual function. Please help with the proper solution! Strategies to denest nested radicals $\sqrt{a+b\sqrt{c}}$ I have recently read some passage about nested radicals, I'm deeply impressed by them. Simple nested radicals $\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}$,$\sqrt{3-2\sqrt{2}}$ which the later can be denested into $1-\sqrt{2}$. This may be able to see through easily, but how can we denest such a complicated one $\sqrt{61-24\sqrt{5}}(=4-3\sqrt{5})$? And Is there any ways to judge if a radical in $\sqrt{a+b\sqrt{c}}$ form can be denested?  Mr. Srinivasa Ramanujan even suggested some CRAZY nested radicals such as: $$\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{2}-1},\sqrt{\sqrt[3]{28}-\sqrt[3]{27}},\sqrt{\sqrt[3]{5}-\sqrt[3]{4}}, \sqrt[3]{\cos{\frac{2\pi}{7}}}+\sqrt[3]{\cos{\frac{4\pi}{7}}}+\sqrt[3]{\cos{\frac{8\pi}{7}}},\sqrt[6]{7\sqrt[3]{20}-19},...$$ Amazing, these all can be denested. I believe there must be some strategies to denest them, but I don't know how.  I'm a just a beginner, can anyone give me some ideas? Thank you. In the  library, they are overloading the () operator.  Is this a convention in C++? For callbacks, etc.?  I have seen this in code of a co-worker (who happens to be a big Boost fan). Of all the Boost goodness out there, this has only led to confusion for me.  Any insight as to the reason for this overload? Can I submit an edit for approval after earning 2k reputation? I have now enough reputation points on Stack Overflow to edit every post directly. But sometimes (especially if this is about a field where I'm not savvy, or when I try to edit a question title without having understood the question itself) I might be not totally sure about whether my edit really is an improvement.  For now, I have these options:   Do the edit anyway, hope that someone else will catch it if it is wrong Don't do the edit, and hope that someone else will see this post and edit it in the right way Let a comment and hope that someone will see it (either after editing or instead of it). Flag the post for moderator attention (but will the moderators know it better?) Search the right chat room to find someone who knows more about the topic.   All these are not really optimal, I think.  I would like to have a check box     [_] Submit this edit for approval   which, when checked, would submit the edit into the usual edit approval queue. Then I would get at least one or two other pairs of eyes looking over my edit, and maybe even improving it.  (I don't really care about the +2 reputation for the edit - I think it should be without any reputation difference here.)  There's an  for nearly giving everyone the ability to suggest edits that the post owner can approve, but I'm simply interested in being able to insert them into the general edit queue where anyone can approve them.  Actually, I could do this right now by having a low-reputation sock puppet (or a totally anonymous edit), but I think this is not the intended use for sock puppets, is it? Also, I would like to be able to get feedback for my edit. Reciprocal of Holder's inequality Does anyone know how to do this exercise? I couldn't do it.  Let $(X,S,\mu)$ be a $\sigma$ -finite measure space and $g\in M(X,S)$ such that $gs\in\mathcal{L}_1$ for any simple function $s\in\mathcal{L}_p$, $p\in(1,\infty)$. Suppose there is $A\geq0$ such that $\left|\int gs\,d\mu\right|\leq A||s||_p$ for all $s$. Show that $g\in\mathcal{L}_p$ with $\frac1p+\frac1q=1$ and $||g||_q\leq A$. How do I install the latest stable version of LibreOffice? LibreOffice is seeing some dramatic improvements each version and subversion that goes out.   I would like to have always the latest version of LibreOffice on my machine(s). I know of the PPA that exists but is it recommended to use it with 12.04 for daily use? What are the pro and cons of using the PPA? Will it break my system/Libreoffice installation?  Does libreoffice get eventually also upgraded in the Ubuntu repositories or does this upgrade happen only with new releases? Who manages the upgrades of libreoffice in Ubuntu and in the PPA? What is the behavior of "delete" with stack objects? Why don't Muggle-born wizards use Muggle technology to fight Death Eaters? In bash, how can I convert a Unicode Codepoint [0-9A-F] into a printable character? I have a list of Unicode codepoints, but I don't know of a "simple" way to convert these hex values into the actual characters they represent...    I've heard that zsh has echo -e '\u0965', but I use bash 4.1.  Is there something as simple as the zsh method, for bash? Bash-like, non-rotating filename tab completion with PowerShell Under Windows, using PowerShell, is it possible to make the filename suggestion (using the Tab key) work like with bash under Linux?  Let's assume a directory contains 3 directories: example1, example and examination.  On Windows (by default), if you type cd ex and Tab, it will auto-suggest cd .\examination. Subsequent uses of Tab will rotate the suggestion between example1, example and examination.  Using bash (typically under Linux), if you type cd ex and Tab, it will auto-complete until the character where the filenames start to differ: cd exam. Another use of Tab then suggests which directories are available:  $ cd exam examination/ example1/    example2/   Then, if you type p and Tab, it will auto-complete to example, and so on (here, offering a choice between example1 and example2).  Is there a way to make the filename suggestion work in a tree-like search like this, instead of rotating through the names?  (I'm mainly interested in file names. Bash can also refine this selection based on the file type, for example only directories for cd, which would be good, but having the file name selection itself would be enough.) Please don't refer to 2019 as 'a great year' Bathroom vanity light with no junction box What is the probability of a biased coin coming up heads given that a liar is claiming that the coin came up heads? A biased coin is tossed.   Probability of Head - $\frac{1}{8}$  Probability of Tail - $\frac{7}{8}$  A liar watches the coin toss. Probability of his lying is $\frac{3}{4}$ and telling the truth is $\frac{1}{4}$. He says that that the outcome is Head. What is the probability that the coin has truly turned Head?  My Attempt:  I used the formula: $$P(A \mid B) = \frac{P(A\cap B)}{P(B)}$$  $\ \ \ \ \ \ $P(it is head GIVEN liar said it's head) = P(it's head AND liar said it's head) / P(liar said it's head)  or, P(it is head GIVEN liar said it's head) = $\frac{ \frac{1}{8} \frac{1}{4} }{ \frac{7}{8}\frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{8}\frac{1}{4} }$ [using a probability tree will be helpful here]  or, P(it is head GIVEN liar said it's head) = $\frac{1}{22}$  The Question: Is the method I used wrong in any way? Some others I have talked to are saying the answer will be $\frac{1}{4}$. Their reasoning is this: since the liar lies 3 times out of 4 and he said it is head, then the probability of it being head is 1/4. So who is right? What will be the answer? nginx open reverse proxy? Somehow, and I'm not sure how, we have configured an nginx reverse proxy that is acting as an open proxy.  The log files tells us the matching requests are going against the following conf file:  map $http_upgrade $connection_upgrade {         default upgrade;         ''      close; }  access_log      /var/log/nginx/access.p.log; error_log       /var/log/nginx/error.p.log;  proxy_next_upstream     error timeout invalid_header http_500 http_502 http_503 http_504; proxy_buffers           8 32k; proxy_buffer_size       64k; proxy_http_version      1.1; proxy_set_header        Host            $host; proxy_set_header        X-Real-IP       $remote_addr; proxy_set_header        X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_redirect          off; proxy_set_header        Upgrade         $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header        Connection      $connection_upgrade;  server {         listen          80;         server_name     ~first.*\.second\.com;          location / {                 resolver                172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2;                 proxy_pass              http://$host;                 proxy_read_timeout      7200s;         } }  server {         listen          443;         server_name     ~first.*\.second\.com;         ssl             on;          location / {                 resolver                172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2;                 proxy_pass              https://$host;                 proxy_read_timeout      7200s;         } }   The top-level conf file looks like this:  user nginx; worker_processes 8; pid /var/run/nginx.pid;  events {         worker_connections 4096;         # multi_accept on; }  http {      ##     # Basic Settings     ##      sendfile on;     tcp_nopush on;     tcp_nodelay on;     keepalive_timeout 65;     types_hash_max_size 2048;     # server_tokens off;      # server_names_hash_bucket_size 64;     # server_name_in_redirect off;      include /etc/nginx/mime.types;     default_type application/octet-stream;      ##     # Logging Settings     ##      access_log /var/log/nginx/access.log;     error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log;      ##     # Gzip Settings     ##      gzip on;     gzip_disable "msie6";      # gzip_vary on;     # gzip_proxied any;     # gzip_comp_level 6;     # gzip_buffers 16 8k;     # gzip_http_version 1.1;     # gzip_types text/plain text/css application/json application/x-javascript text/xml application/xml application/xml+rss text/javascript;      ##     # nginx-naxsi config     ##     # Uncomment it if you installed nginx-naxsi     ##      #include /etc/nginx/naxsi_core.rules;      ##     # nginx-passenger config     ##     # Uncomment it if you installed nginx-passenger     ##      #passenger_root /usr;     #passenger_ruby /usr/bin/ruby;      ##      include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf;     #include /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/*;   }  what here is causing this? Would NAT be eliminated transformed in ipv6? NAT is a wonderful concept used in ipv4. It is the major reason for the existence on internet, in my concerns. There are no networks in the world that doesn't work without employing NAT.  All I seek to know is that, would NAT be required if after ipv6 is implemented, would NAT be eliminated or be used in a different way(Transformed or Upgraded into a new version with some added abilities to tackle any situations or problems that the network specialists or researchers foresee). How can I produce the text Word_one_two in LaTeX?  I tried:  Samp\_Dist\_Corr   But, it doesn't quite look right. Also, I want it in the typewriter font, so actually, I'm doing:  \texttt{Samp\_Dist\_Corr}   I find it looks a bit like the underscore is merging in to the bottom of the "D", but maybe it's just because of the typewriter D?