I have a UTF8 workflow: xelatex, using biblatex and biber for the bibliography, and I think I have come across a funny behaviour from biber. It seems to be converting silently to a percent-coding string (no trace in any log) a URL that contains one single non-ASCII character.  See the MWE with output. The URL contains one simple ü, which is being converted to %C3%BC. I would expect and wish the URL to be kept as it is. Can you spot any mistake? As you can see I've tried the biblatex options that affect biber's, but nothing seems to work, I still get the bloody %C3%BC.  Just in case, I manage my .bib file with BibDesk and I've checked it is saved as UTF8 too.  %!TEX TS-program = xelatex %!TEX encoding = UTF-8 Unicode \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage[backend=biber,bibencoding=utf8,texencoding=utf8,safeinputenc=false]{biblatex}  \usepackage{filecontents}  \begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}  @online{verknupf_expo2016, Author = {{Warburg Institute}}, Title = {Exhibition: \emph{Verknüpfungszwang}}, Url = {http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/exhibition-verknüpfungszwang}, Urldate = {2016-12-12}}  \end{filecontents} \addbibresource{bib.bib} \nocite{*}  \begin{document}  Hello and bla bla bla bla bla bye  \printbibliography \end{document}     I've checked that the .bib file contains the unicode alright, but it has been converted in the .bbl
Is there any way to keep the URLs in the same form they are saved within the .bib files when using biblatex-chicago with Biber? For instance, the entry  @misc{RussianEmpire.1855,  author = {Russian Empire},  year = {1855},  title = {Treaty of Shimoda},  url = {https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Симодский_договор_с_Японией_(1855)}, }   results in the following output:    While there certain are benefits to converting the link itself, this sort of output in the footnote makes it both ugly and difficult to re-enter the link when reading a printed copy. How would one proceed about to receive the output along the lines of ""?  Minimal working example:  %!TEX program = xelatex \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage[russian,british]{babel} \newfontfamily\russianfont[Script=Cyrillic]{CMU Serif}  \usepackage[CJK, Cyrillics]{ucharclasses} \setTransitionsForCyrillics{\russianfont}{} \usepackage{csquotes} \usepackage[labeldate,backend=biber]{biblatex-chicago} \addbibresource{bibliography.bib} \usepackage[unicode,hidelinks]{hyperref}  \begin{filecontents}{bibliography.bib} @misc{RussianEmpire.1855,  author = {Russian Empire},  year = {1855},  title = {Treaty of Shimoda},  url = {https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Симодский_договор_с_Японией_(1855)}, } \end{filecontents}  \begin{document}  Cyrillics support test: Тест\\  \cite{RussianEmpire.1855}  \end{document}   Output:
Pause button started working for Chrome / Youtube, messing with audio player controls Ways to Install and uninstall programs in deb format Command to open a URL Is there a command I can use in Bash that will open a specific URL in the default browser? What plane type will I need to go transatlantic in Pocket Planes? I'm based in North America and have a bunch of major airports on the Eastern Seaboard.  I'm level 14 and just unlocked the Pearjet, but I still don't have a plane with enough range to make it across the Atlantic.  What's the first plane I'll get that will let me make that crossing?  Or more specifically, what's the range from New York (or Boston) to London (or Lisbon) - the smallest range that'll get me across? I am looking for a book about "advanced" classical mechanics. By advanced I mean a book considering directly Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation, and also providing a firm basis in the geometrical consideration related to these to formalism (like tangent bundle, cotangent bundle, 1-form, 2-form, etc.).  I have , but I would like to go into more details about the [symplectic] geometrical and mathematical foundations of classical mechanics.  Additional note: A chapter about relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics would be a good thing. What is the exact $SU(2)$ representation to which these Hermitian generators belong? \begin{equation} t_a=\{t_1,t_2,t_3\}=\left\{\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}  0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \end{pmatrix},\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}  0 &amp; -i &amp; 0 \\ i &amp; 0  &amp; -i \\ 0 &amp; i &amp; 0 \end{pmatrix},\,\begin{pmatrix}  1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -1  \end{pmatrix} \right\} \end{equation}  I'm a bit puzzled with this, these are not the generators of the triplet representation of $SU(2)$ (the triplet in $SU(2)$ is the adjoint rep which is real and constructed with the structure constants), nevertheless they are used as if they were in much literature. What are really these generators? They seem like the extension to 3 dimensions of the Pauli matrices. The 3 dimensional fundamental rep (this does not make sense to me)? some kind of non-irreducible representation? Got ransomware and Shadow explorer doesn't work Solving equation involving Euler's totient function Given $m\in\mathbb{N}$, is there a general way to solve the equation \begin{equation} \varphi(n)=m \end{equation} where $\varphi$ is the Euler's totient function? For example, I want to solve for all the $n$'s such that $\varphi(n)=4$. Is there any way to solve it that are also applicable to many (if not general) cases? How to calculate what this power series converges against? (double factorials) How to join a LAN / IPX game on Diablo 1? Recently some of my friends and I grew nostalgic about the original Diablo and realized we've never truly tried the multiplayer aspect of that game. So we set up a modern VPN LAN solution via tuungle (using the appropriate IPX Wrappers) but the problem is, while any of us can manage to create session in Diablo FULL, others cannot find a way to join my IPX/LAN game.  There are no "join" buttons in the game itself.  I've read somewhere that Spawn version is a trial version but can be used to join Multiplayer games. If they can, is it possible for them to play the entire game on LAN or is trial restricted from choosing some classes/accessing some areas?  Or are there some other ways to join? Of Half-elven and mortal life When half-elvens choose mortal life, how would their bodies behave?  Half-elven are always elves by nature. Ever since they're born, their physical body and behaviour would be elvish - they have keen senses, they don't get physically weary, no illness, and so on.  Half-elvens are then offered a choice - Immortal elvish lives or mortal fate of men. When they choose the latter, like Elros and Arwen did, what would happen to their elvish nature? Would they lose it? I don't think they would lose their pointy ears, but what about the other elvish features that I mentioned before?  Are there any canonical references? Why use a z test rather than a t test with proportional data? can you explain me the working of this circuit in detail? this circuit is a occupancy light circuit i want to know the working of the transistor regarding base,collector and emitter in the transitor Does a gluon have mass or not? I was under the impression that gluons had no mass. Then Wikipedia throws this curveball:  Mass: 0 (theoretical value) &lt; 0.0002 eV/c2 (experimental limit)  Which one should a poor soul go by? If the theoretical value just the one that people &quot;thought&quot; was right, until they found out the truth, or is the experimental limit(?) an impossibility that still has not been explained? Or something third? Why $9$ & $11$ are special in divisibility tests using decimal digit sums? (casting out nines & elevens) I've heard that special relativity makes the concept of magnetic fields irrelevant, replacing them with relativistic effects between charges moving in different velocity frames. Is this true? If so, how does this work? In my book, it proves that an infinite subset of a coutnable set is countable. But not all the details are filled in, and I've tried to fill in all the details below. Could someone tell me if what I wrote below is valid?  Let $S$ be an infinite subset of a countable set $T$. Since $T$ is countable, there exists a bijection $f: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow T$. And $S \subseteq T = \{ f(n) \ | \ n \in \mathbb{N} \}$. Let $n_{1}$ be the smallest positive integer such that $f(n_{1}) \in S$. And continue where $n_{k}$ is the smallest positive integer greater than $n_{k-1}$ such that $f(n_{k}) \in S$. And because $S$ is infinite, we continue forever. Now consider the function $\beta : \mathbb{N} \rightarrow S$ which sends $k \rightarrow f(n_{k})$.   So in order for $S$ to be countable, $\beta$ would have to be a bijection. $\beta$ is injective since if $f(n_{k}) = f(n_{j})$, then $n_{k} = n_{j}$ because $f$ is injective. We also can conclude $k = j$ because the various $n_{i}$ chosen were strictly increasing.   Edit: $\beta$ also needs to be surjective. So for every $r \in S$ there exists a $q \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\beta(q) = f(n_{q}) = r$. We know that $f^{-1}(r) \in \{n_{1}, n_{2}, ..., n_{k} ... \}$, so we can let $f^{-1}(r) = n_{d}$. Thus $\beta(d) = f(n_{d}) = r$. What level is a spell if you cast it without expending a spell slot? My understanding of the Stern–Gerlach experiment is that neutral (0 total charge) particles are sent through a non-homogeneous magnetic field, with the expectation that the field will push that particle's path higher or lower on a detector because of the collective spin of that particle. While the detector can detect particles in a two-dimensional surface, the results of the experiment are that particles appear in only two localized areas directly above the path of the particle stream, or directly below the path of the particle stream - spin up or spin down. The conclusions from these measurements are that the particle, when measured, will always have about the same magnitude.  Why does this not follow from classical mechanical theory related to magnetism? If you shot a magnet through a similar apparatus, I would expect the magnet to be rotated to align with the magnetic field in some way which, at high enough field strengths relative to the mass of the magnet, would cause us to measure basically the same magnitude as if the magnet entered the apparatus pre-aligned with the field.  How is my explanation incorrect? How do you reverse a string in place in C or C++? How do you reverse a string in C or C++ without requiring a separate buffer to hold the reversed string?