The expression "nothingburger" to mean in essence "nothing to see here" has become extremely common in political discourse in the USA. From what I remember it really only became prominent in the last two or three years.  What is the origin of this rather odd word, and what provoked the very recent spike in its usage?  (BTW, please, no politically provocative comments in your answer.)
Breitbart today:   What is the source for the term nothing-burger?
Ubuntu 18.04 bond with netplan duplicate MAC address after cloning Change Linux Mint to Ubuntu Where did they go / do they went? Where did they go?   Where do they went?   Can you please advise which of above forms is correct?  I'm pretty sure that first one is fine but wondering about second one.   Can I use a second form as well or it's incorrect? Save entire process for continuation after reboot I developed an algorithm for a fairly hard problem in mathematics which is likely to need several months to finish. As I have limited resources only, I started this on my Ubuntu 12.04 (x86) laptop. Now I want to install some updates and actually restart the laptop (the "please reboot" message is just annoying).  Is there a way to save an entire process including its allocated memory for continuation beyond a reboot?  Here is some information about the process you might need. Please feel free to ask for further information if needed.   I called the process in a terminal with the command "./binary &gt; ./somefile &amp;" or "time ./binary > ./somefile &amp;", I cannot really remember. It's printing some debug information to std::cerr (not very often). It's currently using roughly 600.0 kiB and even though this will increase, it's unlikely to increase rapidly. the process runs with normal priority the kernel is 3.2.0-26-generic-pae, the cpu is an AMD, the operating system is Ubuntu 12.04 x86. it runs since 9 days and 14 hours (so too long to cancel it ;-) ) An acquaintance recently posted an image to FB from his recent trip to the JFK Historic Site asking for an explanation of a visible artifact he states was not visible to the naked eye but was visible through the EVF of his camera and in the final image.    The artifact is a series of bright, nearly-vertical bars and a longer, almost horizontal bar superimposed over the lower part of the door frame and the radiator.  I found a very similar artifact in another image of the same room from a blogger which isn't as compressed:    In both cases the artifact seems to be a vertically inverted image of the post and rail outside the saturated window.  From looking at other images of the room available online I know there is spherical glass ornament topping the table lamp whose shape is visible at the left of the photo.  One response to the OP's question is as follows:     RK: It is lens flare. So, even on an iPhone, the camera lens is made   up of multiple lenses. Each designed to focus the image and make sure   it isn't distorted. Remember a lens bends light.  Sometimes, based on   angle and intensity of the incoming light, some stray light bounces   back and forth while traveling through the various elements that make   up what we think of as a camera lens (some of mine have 16 elements   inside a single lens.) Even the best glass is capable of reflecting   some light instead of passing it through the lens elements to the   sensor.  This is what you are seeing. The railing is overexposed, and   some stray light is bouncing around a bit inside the lens.   My response:     DJ: I don't think it's lens flare or ghosting. Those usually form an   image of starbursts, rings, or circles in a row across the image or in   the shape of the aperture; or a veiling glare or haze. This is forming   an image of the light outside minus objects in its path. It is more   likely a direct reflection/projection off a mirror or the glass in a   picture frame elsewhere in the room onto the opposite wall and the   radiator. There are two other clues which seem to confirm this. First,   the image has a gradiated appearance, it is less distinct in the   relatively bright area on the door frame and brighter in the   relatively darker areas behind and on the radiator. You would expect   lens flare to be more evenly specular. Second, the image representing   the light from below the horizontal rail changes angle on the   different faces of the door frame. Unlike a projection, lens flare is   an image created within the lens, the physical shape of the objects it   superimposes do not change its shape.      OP: If that were the case, would I have been able to see said   reflection in the room without the camera? There was no image I could   see with the naked eye. I notice the image in my phone before I took   the pic and did a double, triple and quadruple take before I took it   so I'm sure.      DJ: It would have been visible at the moment the image was taken, but   it may not have appeared nearly as bright and distinct because your   eyes were accommodating for the bright light coming in the window. The   projection could have easily been obscured by you or anyone around you   changing position or moving through the path of the projected   reflection. Also, it's been caught by other people... (see Image 2)   Notice that, in the linked example, the projection is again distorted   by the surface it falls on.   Anyone else want to chime in with an explanation? Find the equation of the plane knowing that it passes through 3 points How should I phrase a question that must be answered with an ordinal number (e.g., the third prime)? I want to make a question having an answer as follows:     5 is the third prime number.   The bold part is the answer. How to phrase the question? Beamer continue block in next column javax.faces.application.ViewExpiredException: View could not be restored Number of bases of an n-dimensional vector space over q-element field. If I have an n-dimensional vector space over a field with q elements, how can I find the number of bases of this vector space? Multi-core vs Multi-CPU I am requesting a new server from our Server team. Which is better for SQL Server performance: 2 CPUs with 8 cores per CPU or 1 CPU with 16 cores? Integrating MySQL with Python in Windows Reference label with included file and relaxed clearpage I am running into a rather weird error that apparently originates from the combination of \include, \let\clearpage\relax and a referenced label after a page break.  In this particular example, the label mylabel defined in the listing cannot be referenced anymore when the reference and the label are close enough to a page break.  The MWE consists of two files, the main-file and an included file. I am using the \let\clearpage\relax command to . The error does not occur if the file is \input instead of \included.  \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{book} %  \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % Enoding \usepackage[english]{babel} % Language \usepackage{listings} \usepackage{forloop}  \begin{document} \begingroup \let\clearpage\relax  \include{includedfile} % changing include for input would work  \endgroup \end{document}   Included file:   \newcounter{ct} \forloop{ct}{1}{\value{ct} &lt; 40}% {%     .\\ }  Listing \ref{mylabel}.  \begin{lstlisting}[caption=somecaption, label=mylabel] some code; \end{lstlisting}   Running this example will have an output where the label cannot be referenced (even after multiple runs):    Now, one solution is to use \input as mentioned earlier but I am rather interested in why this happens. Does the \clearpage command fulfil an important function for references to work? And can the error be avoided without removing \let\clearpage\relax while using \include?  EDIT: I just found  with the same issue (though it does not have a definite answer). I want create my own IDE but I want a code editor that would syntax highlighting.  I want to embed it as a control into a WPF window.  Malcolm Determine the SQL Server version and edition from the available set up, before actually installing it? MacBook Pro: How to disable discrete GPU permanently from EFI? Find the eigenvector associated with the smallest eigenvalue, not smallest in magnitude sda1 -> Windows XP  sda2 -> Windows 7 sda3 -> Data Partition   I have created 4 primary partitions, I have 7xx GB left, how can I create one more partition? Can the Hubble constant be measured locally? The Hubble constant, which roughly gauges the extent to which space is being stretched, can be determined from astronomical measurements of galactic velocities (via redshifts) and positions (via standard candles) relative to us. Recently a value of 67.80 ± 0.77 (km/s)/Mpc was published. On the scale of 1 A.U. the value is small, but not infinitesimal by any means (I did the calculation a few months ago, and I think it came out to about 10 meters / year / A.U.). So, can you conceive of a measurement of the Hubble constant that does not rely on any extra-galactic observations?  I ask because, whatever the nature of the expansion described by the Hubble constant, it seems to be completely absent from sub-galactic scales. It is as though the energy of gravitational binding (planets), or for that matter electromagnetic binding (atoms) makes matter completely immune from the expansion of space. The basis for this claim is that if space were also pulling atoms apart, I would naively assume we should be able to measure this effect through modern spectroscopy. Given that we are told the majority of the universe is dark energy, responsible for accelerating the expansion, I wonder, how does this expansion manifest itself locally?   Any thoughts would be appreciated. why can't I edit /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate with vi I'm root, running Centos8 on bare mental and permissions on /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate are as follows  -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Oct  3 14:00 perf_event_max_sample_rate   I want to change the sample rate by opening this file with vi, making the change and then writing it with either w or w!. When I do so it comes back with  perf_event_max_sample_rate" E667: Fsync failed  When I try to quit, it tells me  E37: No write since last change (add ! to override)   So I can't change the value with vi.  However I can change the value with   echo 4000 &gt; /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate   Is this simply because /proc is not a real file system and that all changes to things in /proc would have to be made using echo with a redirect, or maybe sed?  Is this behavior documented somewhere?