I just bought a new laptop, it's ASUS TUF FX505DT, here's the specs:  AMD® Ryzen™ 5 3550H Processor DDR4 2400MHz SDRAM NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1650 , with 4GB GDDR5 VRAM 256GB PCIe® Gen3 SSD  I was wondering if this would work well if I'd switch my OS to Linux, Ubuntu to be specific. I'm running Ubuntu on my old laptop (it's HP Pavilion), and Linux is working well on it. I figured out to ask others who have the same laptop as mine if Linux does work well in this laptop before I switch Windows to Linux. I also heard that NVIDIA doesn't work well with Linux.
I have a device on which I would like to install Ubuntu. How do I find out if Ubuntu will work on it?
Where is Ubuntu terminal located? I am trying to add terminal as external tool to compile javascript with node.js. I am following this  which is based on windows , and i am stuck at figuring out location of terminal application.  Where is the terminal located in Ubuntu? Analogue of closed graph theorem This is the analogue of closed graph theorem for compact space          Suppose that $X$ and $K$ are metric spaces, that $K$ is compact, and that the graph of $f: X \rightarrow K$ is a closed subset of $X \times K$. Prove that $f$ is continuous.      Because metric space is first countable, all we need is to prove that if $x = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{n}$, then $f(x) = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} f(x_{n})$. Suppose $x = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} x_{n}$, then because $K$ is compact, sequence $\{f(x_{n})\}$ has a subsequence $\{f(x_{n_{i}})\}$ converge. Because the graph of $f$ is closed, we must have $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\{f(x_{n_{i}})\} = f(x)$. All we need to prove now is $\{f(x_{n})\}$ converge to $f(x)$, but I can't prove that. Can any one help me. I really appreciate. Thanks Can't restart nginx, bind() failed (98: Address already in use) What temperature can you attain with a solar furnace? Show $x^p-t$ has no root in the field $\mathbb{F}_p(t)$ I don't think I fully understand.  Let's say there is a root $x_0 \in K=\mathbb{F}_p(t)$, where $p$ is a prime number.  Then $x_0 = \frac{P(t)}{Q(t)}$ for some polynomials $P,Q \in \mathbb{F}_p[t]$. We can assume $\gcd(P,Q)=1$  and $x_0^p-t= \frac{(P(t))^p}{(Q(t))^p}-t= \frac{P(t)^p-tQ(t)^p}{Q(t)^p} =0$, so coefficients of $P(t)^p, tQ(t)^p$ must be identical, which contradicts $\gcd(P,Q)=1$,   hence such $x_0$ does not exist and the polynomial has no root in $K$.   am I about right?    anyway, I would appreciate an explanation about $\mathbb{F}_p(t)$, what is $t$? what is the meaning of a variable which does not belong to any specific "world"? I cannot use $t$ as if it was a member of $\mathbb{F}_p$ and hence cannot assume $t^{p-1} = 1 \pmod p$... Bullied boy given immense powers by an alien race who destroys the human race Looking to identify a short story I read in a sci-fi anthology as a child, about an angry, bullied somewhat misanthropic boy who is given immense near-omnipotent powers by an alien intelligence. I read this in English, sometime in the late 1990s/early 2000s. He goes on to use this power to destroy the human race, which causes him to age terribly in a very short amount of time. At the end of the story he is a lonely old man stripped of the powers he held briefly, and is alone on an isolated Earth. The aliens then proceed to invade Earth. How to use if-else option in JSTL I'm new to Ubuntu. I tried installing it with Windows 8.1, but failed I lost all my files.  I have successfully formatted my PC and installed Ubuntu, but how do I install codecs to play audio and videos files ? I have a quick question about buttons that toggle between two states. (Think Play/Pause, or Shuffle/Regular Play.) As the title says, should the toggle show it's current state or the state to which it will transition?  I think people are used to the Play/Pause convention. But the Shuffle/Regular play might be more confusing if you show the transition state instead of current. For example, the built-in music player on the Xbox 360 does it this way: when it's in shuffle mode, it shows the icon for direct play and vice versa and it always confuses me (am I in shuffle mode or straight play).  I see it this way: Play/Pause is more like action as in begin playing or pause playing. Yes behind the scenes it is a state transition but to the user, there is an action. Whereas Shuffle/Straight Play is an option and it's best to show the current state (and possibly have only one icon and change button to show that the option is enabled/disabled). Thoughts? The new profile shouldn't mistakenly imply that you can earn the Informed badge on a meta site I just joined Sports, and I decided to take a look on Sports Meta. I clicked on my profile there. This is part of what I saw:     Yet the profile shouldn't indicate that it is, in theory. . .  This seems to be a bug. How to set a different input method for each app window How can I have a different input method for each app window on windows 8. When I change input language to ENG all app window also uses this method and I don't want that. Like windows 7 that has a different input method for this purpose. thanks How to install software or upgrade from an old unsupported release? Recently I have installed an older version of Ubuntu on my old machine. Whenever I try to install any software, I get an error saying it couldn't be found:  $ sudo apt-get install vlc Reading package lists... Done                Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done     E: Couldn't find package vlc How to make sure that Thinkpad discharges external slice battery first? The thing is that when an external slice battery pack is connected, the laptop first discharges the internal one. This is a problem because then it is impossible to switch between multiple external battery packs without powering off the laptop. It is also not possible to just disconnect the external battery pack when you e.g. need to insert it into a docking station.  Thus, my question: how to change the discharge order under Linux?  For my use cases following order would make much more sense: when an external slice battery is connected, first discharge it completely before using power from the internal battery.  Background: For some Thinkpad models (e.g. X220) there are slice battery packs () available that you can connect to the bottom of the laptop (similar to a docking station).  They seem to be supported well on Linux - e.g. the Gnome Shell battery applet includes both batteries (internal and external) when connected - including displaying the current capacity for each. How to prove this binomial identity $\sum_{r=0}^n {r {n \choose r}} = n2^{n-1}$? How do I install the Firefox Developer Edition? It's been some weeks now, whenever I try to used my Youtube app, it tells me it's impossible to connect to Youtube. Since it's an iPad 1, I have had trouble finding information online.  Did Google or Apple stop supporting the app? Is it finally obsolete? Is there another app I could use that works on iOS 5?  Just to be clear, I did not tinker with my device. I did not change its parameters, I did not jailbreak it, it connects to the Internet just fine and I've tried the app on different Internet connections. Also, this is not a login problem, the app just refuses to let me browse videos, whether I'm logged in or not.  Thanks for your help. Asymptotic complexity of .NET collection classes I am just curious, I use handlebar mounted lights, and since I have multiple bikes to switch, it's a lot of trouble changing the light from one to another. So, I am thinking of switching to helmet mounted lights.  Give me your point of view. Why or why not? Which is better suitable for which riding type? Using "of" or apostrophe, which is more common? We know that wizards in the Harry Potter universe are subject to regular physical harm (e.g. witness injuries from being hit by Bludgers or just colliding with things when playing Quidditch).  Therefore, it's almost a certainty that an average wizard would be vulnerable to, say, a bunch of bullets.   There may likely be spell(s) to protect from projectiles - witness Dumbledore's  deployed when Voldemort sent a bunch of glass at him during the  at the end of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (according to , possibly an unusually powerful Protego or the Silver shield).   But:   those spells obviously take effort/energy/time to cast (not everyone's Dumbledore) AND more likely than not most Death Eaters wouldn't recognize a Muggle gun for a threat (or realize what kind of threat) till too late.   So, the guns should at best allow an over-matched OotP member (e.g. Harry or Hermione) to greatly equalize the power between any regular Death Eaters and themselves, and even perhaps help against Voldemort (who can't be killed with a bullet, but, at best, would need to expend magical energy and time into conjuring a shield, and, at worst, be stopped/interrupted/driven off).  So I'm looking for an explanation - ideally in-universe, but possibly just some statement by JKR - of why the Muggle-born OotP - who are likely very much at ease AND familiar with Muggle technology and live in the late 20th century - do not use guns. Or, for that matter, ANY Muggle technology of the late 20th century? Cue Arthur C. Clarke's "indistinguishable from magic" meme.  Even if they are on some kind of idiotic moral crusade to never kill their opponents (even the Jedi aren't this dumb), given the time-frame, non-lethal weapons would have already existed, such as rubber bullets and tasers.  NOTE: Please don't offer the "if they do it, Death Eaters would start using guns as well" theory. First, Death Eaters would have used the guns if they knew how to, anyway. Second, the guns, like any "secret weapon", could be reserved for strategic battles, say the defense of Hogwarts in Deathly Hallows.    The origin of the question stems from two things.  First, Harry's fascination with all things that are different in the magical world (e.g. moving photographs), based on his knowledge of the Muggle material world, as well as the somewhat amusing cluelessness of the "Muggle artifacts" expert, Mr. Weasley, regarding Muggle items and how they work.   Basically, from the books, it's clear that the Wizarding world wouldn't know details about guns or what they are for or how they work.  The second thing is it's clear, at least initially, that wizards are afraid of Muggles finding out about them. Hence all the efforts to cloak their society (basically, do you REALLY want every Muggle gunning for you, even with Magic)? The idea of how control over the Muggle world seems to be more indirect, by Death Eaters asserting mind-control over the government. This means there's an implicit understanding by Death Eaters that they don't stand a chance against armed Muggles even given the magical disparity.  Considering Harry and Hermione's overall adaptability and inventiveness (and brains in the latter case), it's mind-boggling that the idea of fighting Death Eaters with modern technology completely slipped their mind. I mean, it's a basic part of human myth (see Steel vs. Magic themes in Conan books, or Beowulf, or heck, A Yankee in King Arthur's Court). So it's not like the idea of using technology against magic would be impossible to come up with. The question begs itself - why not? Considering the fact that Rowling generally tried to be logical and consistent in building the HP universe, I feel like there must be some in-universe explanation for this that I just didn't notice.   (in-universe answers only unless there are some authoritative out-of-universe statements that are part of canon).