For the following bibtex entry  @Article{REF56, author = {E Shamonina and L Solymar}, title = {{Magneto-inductive waves supported by metamaterial elements: components for a one-dimensional waveguide}}, journal = {JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D: APPLIED PHYSICS}, year = {2004}, OPTkey = {•}, volume = {37}, number = {3}, pages = {362–367}, OPTmonth = {•}, OPTnote = {•}, OPTannote = {•} }   the output in the generated PDF file is as follows:  Shamonina, E. &amp; Solymar, L. (2004), ‘Magneto-inductive waves supported by metamaterial elements: components for a one-dimensional waveguide’, JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D: APPLIED PHYSICS 37(3), 362âAS367.   It is evident that the page numbers are garbled. Any idea why? I have other similar entries and none of the page numbers are garbled, as in the case of this one. For a MWE, I am using the following:  \documentclass[11pt]{report}  % all packages as necessary  \begin{document}  ......  \end{document}   P.S The style file I am using is utthesis.sty which can be found at the following link:
Here is my bibliography in latex. The types is "Inprooceedings".  I use WinEdt.    @INPROCEEDINGS{tem_1,   Author         = {Comelli, P, Ferragina, P, Granieri, M.N, and Stabile, F},   Title          = {Optical recognition of motor vehicle license plates},   Year           = {1995},   Volume         = {44},   Series         = {4),   Month          = {November},   Pages          = {790–799},   Publisher      = {Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions}    }   But i get this error.   How to solve it?
linear dependence proof using subsets Why is energy in a wave proportional to amplitude squared? I'm a mathematics student trying to grasp some basics about wave propagation. A sentence I find very often in introductive physics textbooks is the following:      In a wave, energy is proportional to amplitude squared.   This is something I would like to understand better in the case of mechanical (linear) waves.  The simplest model is the vibrating string of mass density $\mu$ and tension $T$: here an element of string of rest length $dx$ and vertical displacement $y(x, t)$ possesses a kinetic energy $\frac{1}{2}\mu dx \left( \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}\right)^2$ and a potential elastic energy $\frac{1}{2}T dx \left( \frac{\partial y}{\partial x}\right)^2$. So we have the total energy   $$dE=\frac{1}{2}\mu dx \left( \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}\right)^2+\frac{1}{2}T dx \left( \frac{\partial y}{\partial x}\right)^2,$$  which completely explains the sentence. Can we obtain a similar formula for higher-dimensional waves? How should I modify the above formula for a (simplified model of an) elastic membrane, for example? I would expect something like   $$dE=\text{some constant}\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial t}\right)^2+\text{some other constant}\left\lvert\nabla z\right\rvert^2,$$  where $z=z(x, y, t)$ is the vertical displacement. Am I right? I'm  trying to create a FPS game in blender game engine. When I do KeyBoard[Spacebar] sensor and hook it up to a simple motion of z +1 or something like that, the guys pops up really fast as if he didn't have any motion between being on the ground and being in the air. Is there a way to make a more realistic, more slow jump in BGE? Lenovo Y510P: Battery wont charge past 60% On my y510p, I set Lenovos battery software to "Optimize battery health" while I was in Windows 8.1. I forgot to change it before overwriting that partition with Ubuntu, and now my battery in Ubuntu never charges past 59~60%. I think this is due to something in the BIOS because it persists despite my Windows partition being gone.   I've searched the BIOS but there's no mention of battery anywhere!  I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. C# 3.0 auto-properties — useful or not? Note: This was posted when I was starting out C#. With 2014 knowledge, I can truly say that auto-properties are among the best things that ever happened to the C# language.  I am used to create my properties in C# using a private and a public field:  private string title; public string Title {     get { return title;  }     set { title = value;  } }   Now, with  3.0, we got auto-properties:  public string Title { get; set; }   I know this is more a philosophical/subjective questions, but is there any reason to use these auto-properties except from saving five lines of code for each field? My personal gripe is that those properties are hiding stuff from me, and I am not a big fan of black magic.  In fact, the hidden private field does not even show up in the debugger, which is OK given the fact that the get/set functions do nothing. But when I want to actually implement some getter/setter logic, I have to use the private/public pair anyway.  I see the benefit that I save a lot of code (one vs six lines) without losing the ability to change the getter/setter logic later, but then again I can already do that by simply declaring a public field "Public string Title" without the need of the { get; set; } block, thus even saving more code.  So, what am I missing here? Why would anyone actually want to use auto-properties? Possible pitfalls of using this (extension method based) shorthand Humans don't digest fibre, and nor do any animals, but some creatures have micro-organisms (bacteria, I'm guessing) in their gut which digest fibre for them.  My question is, could humans take some sort of pill and establish our own fibre-digesting colonies in our intestines?  Has this been tried?  Supposing it could be done, would you suppose it would have any negative effects on our health?  (i.e.. would those whose gut digested fibre for them be stuck on a low-fibre diet?).    Purpose of question: just wondering.  It would be cool to be able to eat bark. Shape of the universe? Let $f:[0,\infty)\rightarrow [0,\infty) $ be a continuous strictly increasing function and $g=f^{-1}$. Let $a,b&gt;0$ and $a\neq b$. Then how $\displaystyle\int_{0}^af(x)dx+\int_0^bg(y)dy\geq ab.$ Any hint will be appreciated. Adding HTML entities using CSS content Why does an atom remain uncharged after emission of an alpha particle? When an alpha particle is emitted, two protons and two neutrons leave the nucleus but the electrons remain the same in number. Why does the atom remain uncharged although it appears it should have a net charge of $-2e$? Existence of a Riemannian metric inducing a given distance. Let $M$ be a smooth, finite-dimensional manifold. Suppose $M$ is also a metric space, with a given distance function $d: M \times M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{+}$, which is compatible with the original (manifold) topology on $M$.  Question: is there a Riemannian metric $g$ on $M$ such that the distance $$d_g(p, q) = \inf_{\gamma \in \Omega(p, q)} L_g(\gamma)$$ coincides with $d$?  I believe that this setting is very standard, but for the sake of completeness: $L_g$ denotes the Riemannian length of the curve $\gamma$, and $\Omega(p, q)$ the set of all piecewise smooth curves $\gamma : [a, b] \rightarrow M$ s.t. $\gamma(a) = p$ and $\gamma(b) = q$. Thanks in advance. I have recently found an argument against disabling a root user login in Linux at   I assume that, if everybody uses a public key authentication, there's no risk at losing the root password.  Is it always better to disable the root login via ssh? Commutator subgroup and cyclic normal subgroup Can I get back my saved data? I want to justificate following equation:  $$\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n-k)!}\frac{1}{2k+1} = \frac{2^n}{(2n+1)!!}$$  I calculated the both sides for $n$ from 1 to 10 and it was true. How the mathematical induction can be applied to this equation? Or is there other way to justificate it? Is it required for panel data to use dummy variables? I am doing research considering seven countries and I have panel data. My question is: do I need to include dummy variables every time I use panel data in regression, or is enough to do it as a fixed effect in Stata, without dummy variables? How to create and animate the water reflection (Caustics) on an object? What is the best method to create this kind of reflection and how to animate it? primes whose difference is a multiple of $n$ Hello everyone this is my first question here so if there are any suggested edits  feel free to participate! Is it true that for every $n$ there two prime numbers $p$ and $q$ with $n\mid p-q$? I have verified this empirically but  am not sure if there is a proof for this Using the salesforce GUI it seams impossible to schedule a job every 15 minutes. Or more than once a day.