I leave in the uk with my husband and I just had a baby.  I want my mum to come viait for 3 month. my question is; does my mother need to submit any document from her like bank statement.  she does not work she is just a petty trade just to keep busy.
The UK Visas and Immigration Directorate publishes  that provides helpful tips that can result in successful visa applications. Section 2 of this guidance opens is entitled &quot;other documents you may want to provide&quot; (emphasis mine).  Section 2: other documents you may want to provide – all visitors This section provides guidance on the types of documents that you may want to provide to help us consider your application against the Immigration Rules. Previous travel documents/passports, which show previous travel. Financial documents showing that you have sufficient funds available.  These must clearly show that you have access to the funds, such as:  bank statements building society book proof of earnings such as a letter from employer confirming employment details (start date of employment, salary, role, company contact details) where a third party (who is either in the UK or will be legally in the UK at the time of your visit) is providing financial support to you e.g. a business, a friend or a relative, documents to show that they have sufficient resources to support you in addition to themselves and any dependant family should be provided   The first item is &quot;bank statements&quot; and this ties in with the , which says...  evidence that you can support yourself during your trip, eg bank statements or payslips from the last 6 months  (Note 'eg' is a Latin abbreviation meaning &quot;for example&quot;; this appears to be optional rather than a fixed requirement.) Question: How should someone interpret this such that the chances of success are maximized? How many statements should I submit? What are they looking for and what do my bank statements tell about me?
How do I disable the guest session? How to install Android Studio on Ubuntu? Please tell me the full process of installing Android Studio and its necessary dependencies. Cardinalities of the intervals $(-1,1)$ and $[-1,1]$ using gb4e keeping interlinear glosses together on the same page I am using gb4e for several hundred interlinear glosses in my dissertation. Several of the examples span more than one page, that is, the vernacular and gloss will be on one page, while the free translation appears at the top of the next page.   How can I keep all three elements together on the same page? I often have subexamples (a, b, c) that don't need to stay together. That is, 1a can be on one page, and 1b on the next, as long as vernacular-gloss-free translation for each subpart stay together.  In the MWE below, the free translation is at the top of page 2, while the vernacular and gloss are at the bottom of page 1.  \documentclass[11pt,letterpaper]{article} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{gb4e} \noautomath \begin{document} \lipsum[1-4] \begin{exe}     \ex \gll wuz x̃ũch it-ak xohish-em\\              1\textsc{sg.prn} bread eat-\textsc{inf} want.\textsc{prs}-1\textsc{sg}\\         \glt `I want to eat bread.'  \end{exe} \end{document}   A solution was proposed to a similar question (), but it requires me to manually look for what could be dozens of orphans throughout my dissertation (and doesn't work when applied to my example, since it still strands the FT). I would prefer a more elegant solution that takes care of the problem automatically. Is it possible to prove $g^{|G|}=e$ in all finite groups without talking about cosets? Detect if program is running with full administrator rights Known proofs of Wirtinger's Inequality? "This site is all about getting answers. It's not a discussion forum. There's no chit-chat." The  has this text:     This site is all about getting answers. It's not a discussion forum. There's no chit-chat.   It's probably an oversight and copied from the regular site tours. Can it be reworded/removed?  Right above that text, there's this:      So each community has a meta to discuss site-specific issues, and Meta Stack Exchange is for conversations about problems and ideas that affect the whole network.   Don't they contradict eachother? Let $G$ be a graph of minimum degree $k&gt;1$. Show that $G$ has a cycle of length at least $k+1$.  How would I show this? I understand that a cycle is a sequence of non-repeated vertices and the degree of a graph is the number of neighbors the vertex has. User with low reputation shows as having modified thread How can this user , reputation 3, show in  as having "modified 7 hours ago", but on the modified thread, , not show at all?  This user also has two medals, which is somewhat puzzling. How to show that topological groups are automatically Hausdorff? On page 146, James Munkres' textbook Topology(2ed),  Show that $G$ (a topological group) is Hausdorff. In fact, show that if $x \neq y$, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $e$ such that $V \cdot x$ and $V \cdot y$ are disjoint.  Noticeably, the definition of topological group in Munkres's textbook differs from that in .  A topological group $G$ is a group that is also a topological space satisfying the $T_1$ axiom, such that the map of $G \times G$ into $G$ sending $x \times y$ into $x \cdot y$ and the map of $G$ into $G$ sending $x$ into $x^{-1}$, are continuous maps. In general, in most places, it is said that using TeX defaults is the best. However, TeX does provide things like \, and \quad etc. When one should use them? Both in general and in math mode in particular. Is there a command to show the directory/file name when cat files?  For example: assume two files f1.txt and f2.txt are under ./tmp  ./tmp/f1.txt ./tmp/f2.txt    Then when I do cat ./tmp/*.txt, only the content of files will be shown. But how to firstly show the file name, then the content?, e.g.:   (The needed command):  ./tmp/f1.txt:    This is from f1.txt  and so on  ./tmp/f1.txt:  This is from f2.txt ...   Is there a command to do it? (There seems to be no option for 'cat' to show the file names) Using custom tables in nft I have a Fedora 31 system on which I am using iptables-nft. I need this because there is still a bunch of software that expects the legacy iptables command line tools.  This means that my nftables configuration has the corresponding set of tables to match the legacy configuration:  table ip filter table ip nat table ip6 filter table ip mangle table ip6 nat table ip6 mangle   I use a containerized VPN service that, prior to nftables, would enable masquerading on my primary ethernet interface by running something like this when the vpn comes up:  iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.16.254.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE   Since upgrading to Fedora 31 and iptables-nft, this no longer works. The container (running alpine) does not have the iptables-nft compatability wrapper, but it does have the nft command itself.  I can't use the nft cli to add rules to the existing tables, because this will break iptables-nft. But I can create new tables. I was hoping I could just apply a configuration like this:  table ip vpn {     chain postrouting {         type nat hook postrouting priority filter; policy accept;         ip saddr 172.16.254.0/24 oifname "eth0" counter masquerade     }      chain forward {         type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept;         ip saddr 172.16.254.0/24 counter accept     } }   ...but this doesn't appear to have any impact. By setting the chains in this table to priority 0 I was hoping they would match before the legacy nat table, but that doesn't appear to be the case.  Is there a way to make this work? For a moderately complex query I am trying to optimize, I noticed that removing the TOP n clause changes the execution plan.  I would have guessed that when a query includes TOP n the database engine would run the query ignoring the the TOP clause, and then at the end just shrink that result set down to the n number of rows that was requested.  The graphical execution plan seems to indicate this is the case -- TOP is the "last" step.  But it appears there is more going on.  My question is, how (and why) does a TOP n clause impact the execution plan of a query?  Here is a simplified version of what is going on in my case:  The query is matching rows from two tables, A and B.    Without the TOP clause, the optimizer estimates there will be 19k rows from table A and 46k rows from table B.  The actual number of rows returned is 16k for A and 13k for B.  A hash match is used to join these two results sets for a total of 69 rows (then a sort is applied).  This query happens very quickly.  When I add TOP 1001 the optimizer does not use a hash match; instead it first sorts the results from table A (same estimate/actual of 19k/16k) and does a nested loop against table B.  The estimated number of rows for table B is now 1, and the strange thing is that the TOP n directly affects the estimated number of executions (index seek) against B -- it appears to always be 2n+1, or in my case 2003.  This estimate changes accordingly if I change TOP n.  Of course, since this is a nested join the actual number of executions is 16k (the number of rows from table A) and this slows down the query.  The actual scenario is a bit more complex but this captures the basic idea/behavior.  Both tables are searched using index seeks.  This is SQL Server 2008 R2 Enterprise edition. Prove that $\binom{m+n}{m}=\sum\limits_{i=0}^m \binom{m}{i}\binom{n}{i}$ I need to proof this following equality :  $$\binom{m+n}{m}=\sum_{i=0}^m \left(\binom{m}{i}\binom{n}{i}\right)$$  This is what I did combinatoric proof:  Left : subset with $m$ members from $m+n$  Right : $\binom{m}{i} \rightarrow$ The number of subsets in set $m$ could also be written as $2^m$ AND $\binom{n}{i} \rightarrow$ the number of subsets with $m$ members from set $n$  In case $ n \leq m \implies \binom{n}{i}=2^n$  So this is what I came up with I still can't see why those expression are equal.  Any ideas? Thanks. Reason for the current trend to use «she» as the gender-neutral pronoun? I've read before that, by the Principle of Explosion, if a theory is inconsistent, then absolutely any statement can be proven within it.  Obviously, there are statements which are independent of ZFC (Continuum Hypothesis, etc). It seems to me that this proves that ZFC is incomplete. Why does it not then follow that ZFC is consistent? It seems to me that we could say "Assume ZFC is inconsistent. Then the the Continuum Hypothesis is provable in ZFC. But the Continuum Hypothesis is neither provable nor disprovable in ZFC. Therefore ZFC is consistent."  What am I missing here? In this case what is correct?        Keep Tom and I updated.      or         Keep Tom and me updated.      I understand that me is an object pronoun. And therefore I feel the second option is correct.  Especially, because I would say "Keep him updated" and also "Keep me updated". Instead of "Keep he updated" or "Keep I updated". But something about saying "Keep him and me updated" feels wrong.  However I am not sure, because several people have told me that in this case I is the correct option because it is being used in conjunction with a name (Tom) and not a pronoun. Is that correct? How to calculate bounce angle? I played around with it for a while, but I simply can't figure it out.  I made a tank that fires missiles, and when the missiles hit the walls, I want them to bounce off, but I want them to bounce off to the right angle.  Right now I haven't got any obstacles, the missiles just bounce off when they get outside the viewportRectangle I made.  Is the solution I'm looking for quite advanced?  Is there a relativly simple way to do it?