I saved and closed my project, but after opening again there are only 52 actions in my Action Editor instead of the 72 I made? How is this possible?
I created a model and added some Actions in the DopeSheet editor (more or less 5).  I exported the model to my game engine, saved the .blend file (Ctrl-S) and closed it.  Then I opened it again, and all the actions were gone, it just had the one I was using last.  The same happens with some preferences (for example, I disabled mip-maps on User Preferences -> System, and I have to re-enable it every time I open the .blend file again.  Does somebody knows how to restore the Actions and save everything? Thanks.
Does time freeze at Absolute Zero? Time has many definitions per se, but the basic idea being it's "the measurement of change" so as we know, all matter looses it's ability of changing with the loss of kinetic energy. and the where it becomes zero is the absolute zero (−273.15°C). so my question would be, will time stop/freeze at Absolute zero? and does time get slow while reaching there? How do i make my ubuntu server public? I want to know how to make my ubuntu server ip public. I'm not asking for a domain, if people would be able to access my website by ip, it would be great! (just for now) Does someone have an idea how to do this? "implements Runnable" vs "extends Thread" in Java From what time I've spent with threads in Java, I've found these two ways to write threads:  With implements Runnable:  public class MyRunnable implements Runnable {     public void run() {         //Code     } } //Started with a "new Thread(new MyRunnable()).start()" call   Or, with extends Thread:  public class MyThread extends Thread {     public MyThread() {         super("MyThread");     }     public void run() {         //Code     } } //Started with a "new MyThread().start()" call   Is there any significant difference in these two blocks of code ? Remove all but numbers from NSString I really hope someone will take a quick look at the following, I would just love to better understand it...  This exercise is from Arnold's "Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics", p. 97 in the chapter on d'Alemberts principle:  A rod of weight P, tilted at an angle of 60° to the plane of a table, begins to fall with initial velocity zero. Find the constraint force of the table at the initial moment, considering the table as  (a) absolutely smooth  (b) absolutely rough  (In the first case, the holonomic constraint holds the end of the rod on the plane of the table, and in the second case, at a given point.)"      I must admit, I am pretty unsure on how to do calculations using this "fancy" mathematical kind of physics.  First off, I'm lost with (a). But I'll have a go at (b): As far as I understood, d'Alemberts principle states, that if $M$ is a constraining manifold, $x(q)$ is a curve in $M$ and $\xi$ is a vector perpendicular to $T_xM$, then $x$ satisfies Lagrange's equations  $\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} \qquad L = \frac{{\dot x}^2}{2} - U(x)$  iff for the following inner product, we have  $\left(m \ddot x + \frac{\partial U}{\partial x}, \xi \right) = 0$  I guess that's about right so far? The constraint would in this case essentially be $\mathbb S^1$, since the rod moves on a circe around the point in contact with the table. Can we assume that all the rod's mass is at the center of mass?  Would we then have $U(x) = -gx_2$ in this case (where $x_2$ is the vertical component of $x$)?  If yes, then $\partial U / \partial x = -ge_2$. Where $e_1, e_2$ are the horizontal and vertical unit vectors, respectively.  At the inital moment, we have $x = \cos(60°) e_1 + \sin(60°) e_2$, so by d'Alembert's principle we must have  $\left(m \ddot x + \frac{\partial U}{\partial x}, \cos(60°) e_1 + \sin(60°) e_2 \right) = 0$  or written differently  $m \ddot {x_1} \cos(60°) + m \ddot{x_2} \sin(60°) - \sin(60°)g = 0$    So: Is this correct so far? Or am I way off? Is (a) handled any differently up to this point?  Thanks for reading (and hopefully thanks for your helpful reply)!  If anyone could recommend a good problem book (with solutions), in which this kind of mathematical approach is used (I don't know if this is how physicists would actually compute stuff??), I would greatly appreciate it.  Kind regards,  Sam How does a fork bomb work? I'm designing a small module that breaks out a DIP SPI EEPROM to a 2x5 pin header socket(more info here: ). I want to mount the socket on the end of the board, with the pins lying parallel to the board.  I think two 5x1 surface-mount header footprints, on both sides of the board right near the end would do the job. Trouble is, KiCAD doesn't come with such a footprint(if it does, I haven't found it yet). Where might I find one? If one doesn't exist, that's OK; I'll have a shot at making my own. I have looked through several questions and answers on EL&amp;U, and often there is an indication that American English prefers "have" while British English prefers "have got". In addition, there are several references to "have got" being more informal than "have" (e.g.: , ). But where is it considered more informal? In American English alone or both American and British English?   This point may seem obvious to those who made the above mentioned references, but the fact is that even the most fluent users of English in my country will say without a doubt that 'have got' is the preferred usage in the UK and, therefore, it must also be more formal. Why? Because in an academic environment, the more informal structures are generally frowned upon, outside some specific spoken exercises. And if the teachers insist on using "have got", it follows it isn't informal.  So, is the teaching of (British) English in our schools transmitting the wrong idea?  EDIT: I'm adding some information in answer to the comments.  I'm mainly concerned with the idea of possession:      I have got a cat vs. I have a cat and She has got a dog vs. She has a dog   As mentioned in the comments, every (Portuguese) student will be told that "have" and "have got", when it comes to the idea of possession, are absolute synonyms, the only two differences being:    "have got" is preferred by British English, "have" is preferred by American English   the negative and interrogative structures differ    I have never heard of any distinction in formality. In fact, I was rather surprised when I went through the EL&amp;U archives and read about it.  So, would "I have got a cat" be as formal/informal as "I have a cat"?   And how do British and American English look at its formality/informality? Is it the same? How would I prove there is no smallest positive rational number? what is the best method to prove this statement? I'm trying to typeset a table that would have a header in the first row (I'm not looking for a different/better solution to adding a header, but for a fix to this solution. Thanks). I want to achieve this by having a multicolumn cell spanning all the columns of the first row. The problem is that if the text is too long, the column widths are uneven, with the last column accumulating excess width. I would expect all of the columns to be of approximately the same width (although I cannot find a decent source that would say they should), given the fact that all the text in the second row is of approximately the same width.  I find this behaviour quite puzzling and have no idea what the cause could be. I know I could perhaps remedy this by manually setting the column widths, but am curious as to how to fix this without doing that (I do not need or indeed want the columns to be of the same width, but roughly proportional to the length of their content), preferably but not necessarily by using the tabular environment only (some other conflict with the document class I am using).   What is it that I'm doing or assuming wrong? And why?  MWE:  \documentclass{article} \begin{document}  \begin{tabular}{ccccc} \multicolumn{5}{c}{This is a piece of text. The longer it is, the longer the last column.} \\  1 &amp; 2 &amp; 3 &amp; 4 &amp; 5 \\ \hline \end{tabular}  \end{document}   Resulting table. Notice how the last column of the second row accumulates excess width. Why didn't Spock die in The Search for Spock? Has the below question been answered here before?  Prove: For a given enclosed volume, a sphere has minimum surface area.  Please provide link or ways to solve it. I know it is a problem of Minima and involves finding derivative and second derivatives. However, how to to frame the leading equations which has to be differentiated?  I am looking for a way to solve only using High School level Calculus. I think there must be an answer. How to run a specific program as root without a password prompt? Is there any shortcut/easy way to switch this system proxy settings? dotted line with appropriate length for answering a question? Kindly have a look at this code   \documentclass{article} \usepackage{fontspec} \defaultfontfeatures{Ligatures=TeX} \usepackage[small,sf,bf]{titlesec}  \setromanfont{Georgia} \usepackage{amssymb}  \newcommand{\checkbox}{$\square$} \begin{document}  If appropriate \checkbox  . Why appropriate, specify? ........... If inappropriate \checkbox . Why inappropriate, specify? .............. If appropriate \checkbox . Why appropriate, specify? ...........\\ If inappropriate \checkbox . Why inappropriate, specify? ...........  \end{document}   How can I make a dotted like, of appropriate length so that it is depressed, fainter, has consistent length so that it occupies the remaining white space in the  line or has specified length. Say a security has been trading at under $20.10, and there are limit orders selling at $20.10 and $20.21. Then Simon issues a limit order to buy at $20.21. According to , Simon would end up buying shares at $20.10.  Why does the exchange favor the buyer here?  I.e., why does the transaction execute at the seller's limit of $20.10 instead of the buyer's limit of $20.21?  (I.e., why don't Inara/River get to sell at $20.21 / above their limit, but Simon gets to buy at $20.10 / below his limit?)  Is the example flawed?  If it makes a difference, I'm mainly curious about NASDAQ and NYSE.  I tried Googling for specs (e.g. ), but couldn't find anything.  Only found that some  implementation executes the average of the buy/ask.  Just curious how the system works. How much will a poor first semester affect my grad school chances? Do the Ents go to the Undying Lands? Specifying latest revision of a particular branch with bower Edit source differs from question view? Or are we each other's friends now?