Two genitives in serie with 's Is it correct to say : "What is the John's car's color ?" ? As non native speaker, this sentence seems weird to me. Would I say : "What is the color of the John's car ?"
Two possessive nouns in a row Is this the proper way to use two possessive nouns in a row?     I am going over to Lauren's parents' house this evening.   or     The store's manager's niece was quite attractive.   What about three?*     The United States Army's general's wife's dog is on the lamb, somebody stop it.   *Three seems both unrealistic, and in the specific example I used you could make a case for adding a fourth United State's Army's but I think that seems even more unrealistic.  Additionally, I would never write this in any sort of setting other than the purpose of knowing what the rules are.  Thanks in advance, I apologize in advance if this is duplicate
I tried this way, I only need to know if this is correct or if there are better ways to solve this:  $2^{1000}$ does not have a factor of $5$ obviously therefore we can assume  $$ 10^{m} &lt; 2^{1000} &lt; 10^{m+1}$$ for some  $m$   Assume $ k = 2^{1000}$, then take log on both sides $\log k = 1000  \log 2 \approx 301.02999 &gt; 301$  Therefore $2^{1000}$ has $302$ digits. About $\lim \left(1+\frac {x}{n}\right)^n$ When I run LaTeX file its gives error as  "! Package minted Error: You must have pygmentize installed to use this package", you must have pygments installed. when I go through minted documentation minted itself required pygments, so Tex friend How do I install this pygment, I don't know the procedure to install. Please guid me or any link pygement.exe file A slick proof that a field which is finitely generated as a ring is finite It is a known fact that if $k$ is a field that is finitely generated as a ring, which is the same as having a surjective ring homomorphism $f:\mathbb{Z}[x_1,\dots,x_n]\to k$ for some $n\in \mathbb{N}$, then $k$ must be finite. Since finite generation as a ring implies finite generation over the prime field ($\mathbb Q$ or $\mathbb F_p$), by Noether normalization it follows that $k$ must be a finite extension of its prime field. In positive characteristic this finishes the job and in zero characteristic, should lead quickly to a contradiction, though I don't see immediately how. Is there an elementary/slick proof of this fact? Why doesn't \makeatletter work inside \newcommand? After hours of banging my brain against my skull, I narrowed down an issue I'm having to the fact that \makeatletter doesn't work inside \newcommand. Commands that I call after \makeatletter are registered as undefined, as if \makeatletter didn't do anything.  Why is this the case?  In the example below, I define two commands. Calling one of them from the document body causes the undefined error, while the other doesn't.  \documentclass[11pt]{book} \usepackage{kvsetkeys}  \newcommand{\commandThatFails}{     \makeatletter \comma@parse{}{} \makeatother }  \makeatletter     \newcommand{\commandThatWorks}{         \comma@parse{}{}     } \makeatother  \begin{document}  Hi there.  \commandThatFails \commandThatWorks  \end{document} When is a clause not essential? I am having trouble figuring out when to use commas to set off &quot;nonessential&quot; information.  Sometimes it's obvious:  Bob, who is thirty years old, is an alcoholic.  But other times I'm not sure:  The day he quits drinking * he will start a llama farm He has his heart set on owning El Duderino ranch * in New Mexico.  In the first case, my ear says that there should be a comma at *, even though information before it seems essential to me.  In the second case, the stuff after * is not essential, and yet it seems a little much to use a comma. Even that last sentence I wrote confuses me.  &quot;In the second case&quot; seems essential but I used a comma.  Is this correct? Does it depend on personal style and the length of the clause?  Or perhaps I'm misinterpreting the meaning of &quot;essential&quot; in this context? Add a transparent image on top of a material I'm designing this animal-type creature, and want to add a transparent .png image to its face with the face features (object has a subsurf). On the left is the image with the features, on the right is the part of the object where I want it to be.    I tried to import the image as a plane, but matching the shape of the plane with the face didn't work, and the lines of the face left shadows on the head, and could be seen as a different object from some angles (although it's the closest I've gotten yet). It looked like this:    So , I tried selecting the faces of the head that the features should go over, and create a new material for it. Unfortunately, since the .png is transparent, the result produced was this:    (where it's impossible to tell the transparency from a black background default color, and where I wouldn't know where to start to adjust size and position).  I also tried UV mapping, but then the whole object became black with the features repeated all over.   Is it something I have to go into Nodes for? I'm kind of stuck here. Creating a new material and applying it is simple, but applying a material that is an image is a bit more complex it seems... Ideally, I would reproduce the same technique for the adhesive bandage on its arm (seen on the right of image 1). Running programs in the background from terminal How do I run a program in the background of a shell, with the ability to close the shell while leaving the program running? Lets say my UI is having problems or for some reason, I need to boot up a program from the terminal window, say, nm-applet:  nm-applet   When it's started, it occupies the foreground of the terminal window.  Is there any simple way to run the program in the background without needing to leave the terminal open or have it occupy the whole terminal?  On that note, I did find a way to run programs from the terminal and have it allow for other inputs, by appending an ampersand (&amp;) to the command as such:  nm-applet &amp;   But this isn't much use as any processes started in the terminal are killed once the terminal is closed. BM01 2011/12 Question 6 Geometry Problem Let $ABC$ be an acute-angled triangle. The feet of the altitudes from $A,B$ and $C$ are $D, E$ and $F$ respectively. Prove that $DE +DF \le BC$ and determine the triangles for which equality holds. The altitude from A is the line through A which is perpendicular to BC. The foot of this altitude is the point D where it meets BC. The other altitudes are similarly defined.   Thanks in advance for any contributions. Accessing the index in 'for' loops? How do I access the index in a for loop like the following?  ints = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78] for i in ints:     print('item #{} = {}'.format(???, i))   I want to get this output:  item #1 = 8 item #2 = 23 item #3 = 45 item #4 = 12 item #5 = 78   When I loop through it using a for loop, how do I access the loop index, from 1 to 5 in this case? 'setenv' command not working on tcsh shell when called explicitly I can run setenv command just fine in my tcsh shell like this:  echo $0 /usr/bin/tcsh echo $SHELL /usr/bin/tcsh setenv START_TIME `date +%s` echo $START_TIME 1499355967   But, whenever I run it explicitly like shown below, it doesn't work. I need to do this because I have to specify shell when executing it via python subprocess call, otherwise it will call a sh shell as default.  /usr/bin/tcsh -i -f -c 'setenv START_TIME `date +%s`' echo $START_TIME START_TIME: Undefined variable.   What's the problem here? I searched for this issue online, but couldn't find any issue similar to this. This is extremely frustrating. If a lens focuses all incoming light to a point, how do we get 2D images? How do lenses produce 2-dimensional images, if a lens bends all incoming rays of light to intersect at the focal point? Shouldn't this produce a single dot of light on a screen placed at the focal length?  This is basically the standard diagram that always shows up in textbooks:    I know this doesn't happen in real life--I used to use telescopes pretty frequently for work. The most in-focus image would be the one with the smallest diameters for the stars, which, of course, we think of point sources at infinity. But--the light from all stars (despite being at infinity) is not all focused at a single point. Instead, each star's light is focused at its own $(x,y)$ point on a 2D image.  I can't reconcile the theory as I understand it with any of my real-life experience with optics. What am I missing? Why is the electric field zero inside a hollow conducting sphere? How should I structure my URLs for both SEO and localization? Is there ever a case where you would want to accept an answer, but not upvote it?  I can't think of a single situation where this would be the case.. So would it not make sense to have the "Accept" button upvote the answer too? Integral $ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{x^{2}}{\cosh\left(x\right)}\,{\rm d}x $ I need to compute the improper integral $$ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{x^{2}}{\cosh\left(x\right)}\,{\rm d}x $$ using contour integration and possibly principal values.  Trying to approach this as I would normally approach evaluating an improper integral using contour integration doesn't work here, and doesn't really give me any clues as to how I should do it. This normal approach is namely evaluating the contour integral $$ \oint_{C}{\frac{z^2}{\cosh\left(z\right)}\mathrm{d}z} $$ using a semicircle in the upper-half plane centered at the origin, but the semicircular part of this contour integral does not vanish since $\cosh\left(z\right)$ has period $2\pi\mathrm{i}$ and there are infinitely-many poles of the integrand along the imaginary axis given by $-\pi\mathrm{i}/2 + 2n\pi\mathrm{i}$ and $\pi\mathrm{i}/2 + 2n\pi\mathrm{i}$ for $n \in \mathbb{Z}$. The residues of the integrand at these simple poles are $-\frac{1}{4}\mathrm{i}\pi^{2}\left(1 - 4n\right)^{2}$ and $\frac{1}{4}\mathrm{i}\left(4\pi n + \pi\right)^{2}$, so that even when we add up all of the poles, we have the sum $4\pi^{2}\mathrm{i}\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\,n$, which clearly diverges.  Any hints would be greatly appreciated. Is there a difference between foo(void) and foo() in C++ or C? Consider these two function definitions:  void foo() { }  void foo(void) { }   Is there any difference between these two? If not, why is the void argument there? Aesthetic reasons? I want to supply constant voltage to my LED's but the supply varies from 3.7V to 4.2V (Li-ion battery). I cannot use 3.3V voltage regulator as it will need at least 4.3V voltage at the input but my battery can supply only 4.2V max. so is there any other way I can supply regulated 3.3V to my LED.   RGB LED = 3.3V, 60mA Battery = 3.7V - 4.2V, 3000mA Number of LEDs = 24 The LED's are connected in parallel Why did the Star Trek writers decide Warp 10 would be infinite? From  onward,  has a basically cubic scale from warps 1 - 9. But then, close to warp 10, it suddenly develops its own puzzling scale, as can be seen in .  In this scale, , occupying all points in the universe simultaneously and therefore effectively teleporting instantaneously.  My question is why have this confusing scale? Why not have a uniform cubic scale? Was there ever any "official" explanation for this?  Clarification: I'm looking for why the writers decided on this, not the "in-universe" explanation. Changing password? I would like to change my password.  I have followed the instructions in  but I cannot find the "my logins" hyperlink.