Earlier in outliner 3 options were available for each object one of which was disable render. Now only one option is available for each object. Basically how to disable render for single object inside of collection
The selection toggle arrows in the Outliner disappeared. Is there some preference in the settings that has to be turned on?
Line numbering paragraph oriented? I'm using the lineno package with the pagewise option but I need a way to get the numbering restart every paragraph break. I need a general solution to pass to the latex command, e.g.:  latex "\AtBeginDocument{\RequirePackage[pagewise]{lineno}\linenumbers}\input{mydocument.tex}"   I read the lineno manual but the package does not provide this feature. Is there any trick to do that? Subsurf on a crown. How can I smooth some edges and keep others sharp? How can I smooth all crown but don't smooth the top of the crown? I did a subdivision surface, but this didn't work. All crown became smooth and changed form. I was loading an image resource with the following code and it works fine from my dev environment (netbeans) but threw an exception as soon as it ran from the desktop.  new ImageIcon(Images.class.getResource("images/highlighter24.gif"));   I traced it down to my file having different case than in the code.  Fine, my bad, but why the inconsistent behavior?  Gremlins?  Note: I'm running on windows before you ask. What counter balances gravity here? Lets consider a stone tied to one end of a massless and unstretchable string... Now if i'll start rotating, it will form a conical pendulum &amp; then the equilibrium is achived when the pendulum attains horizontal circular motion.... Now to maintain that state we give a constant force to string.... Here, which force counterbalances gravity? Is it the torque due to applied force cancels out the torque due to gravity?  The angle θ changes from 0 to 90° Equal simple field extensions? I have a question about simple field extensions.  For a field $F$, if $[F(a):F]$ is odd, then why is $F(a)=F(a^2)$? Why is the Descriptor not getting called when defined as instance attribute? What happens to water level when ice XII melts? There exists this famous idea that if all floating icebergs melt, water level will stay the same (because the water replaced by ice is the volume of the melted ice). Now,   Is this always so, if you allow more exotic forms of ice (take e.g. ice XII with density 1.29) ? Is this always so on/in earth ?   EDIT:  I was looking a possibility that you would have water as a liquid that contains pieces of water as a solid. No land is assumed to exist here. "Ice" is always floating or sunken(if possible).  To reformulate, can Ice be sunken in water in any circumstance (pressure, temperature)?  EDIT 2:  Wikipedia: "Ice VII has a density of about 1.65 g cm-3 (at 2.5 GPa and 25°C)".   And water as an incompressible liquid has a density of 1 g cm-3. This means that ice VII is at the bottom of the "lake" and will expand when it melts. Is this true? And are there environments in earth where this (or similar) can happen? I am a grad student developing an interest for statistics. I like the material over-all, but I sometimes have a hard time thinking about applications to real life. Specifically, my question is about commonly used statistical distributions (normal - beta- gamma etc.). I guess for some cases I get the particular properties that make the distribution quite nice - memoryless property of exponential for example. But for many other cases, I don't have an intuition about both the importance and application areas of the common distributions that we see in textbooks.   There are probably a lot of good sources addressing my concerns, I would be glad if you could share those. I would be a lot more motivated into the material if I could associate it with real-life examples. Why isn't reflexivity redundant in the definition of equivalence relation? An equivalence relation is defined by three properties: reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity.  Doesn't symmetry and transitivity implies reflexivity? Consider the following argument.  For any $a$ and $b$, $a R b$ implies $b R a$ by symmetry. Using transitivity, we have $a R a$.  Source: Exercise 8.46, P195 of Mathematical Proofs, 2nd (not 3rd) ed. by Chartrand et al Number theory lemma - $x^2 \equiv 1 \pmod p$ implies $x\equiv\pm 1\pmod p$ In the United States, we say that someone lives on a street, whereas I've noticed that British people say in. For instance:     Bubba lives on Washington Street.   Colin lives in Cavendish Avenue.   I believe we both would use at when a number is given. For instance:     Bubba lives at 16 Washington Street.   Colin lives at 7 Cavendish Avenue.   I don't think it matters if it's a road, avenue, street, circle, or lane — as far as I know, in America, we always live on a street. Does it vary in British English, or is it always in? If it varies, what are the rules? proving that $f(x) = x^s$ is holder continuous with holder exponent s Weird line in my mirrored mesh I have a PDF with 100 pages. How can I make a new PDF that displays 4 pages on one?  I know that I can do it with Chrome by printing the PDF to new PDF and change this in the options. But I want to make it for a lot of files and put it as a script. Please make the multiple comment timer less annoying (non-resetting etc.) As a little feature to prevent comment spam, you can only enter one comment every 15 seconds. That's a very reasonable limitation, since you very rarely have a good reason to write comments that quickly. I've only seen it twice at all, I think, but both times it was extremely annoying.     Only 1 comment allowed per 15 seconds; timer reset.   The reason is that every time you hit the limit, the 15 seconds begin anew. You have no indicator that tells you when you are allowed to comment again, and if you hit enter after just 14 seconds, you're back to zero. Yesterday, I went through four cycles of not quite 15 seconds, counting in my head, before I got a myself a coffee and tried again afterwards.  I suggest that you do one or more of the following (in decreasing order):   Make the counter non-restarting Add a visible countdown Make it clearly visible that you can't comment right now You can actually increase the waiting time, if it is clearly visible and there is no unnerving invisible countdown. Actually, just remove all comment fields after one comment, and tell the user to reload the page. Just please don't have UI elements that look like they would work, but feel like they are trolling you. (Last Jedi spoilers ahead, if you haven't seen the movie, please don't read on.)  So, fridge logic moment for me:      If Vice Admiral Holdo had told Poe Dameron about the plan to just hold on long enough to make a covert run to Krait, then Poe wouldn't have felt the need to send Finn and Rose on their little side-trip, and the code-breaker wouldn't have overheard anything nor sold them out, and the First Order would've had no reason to notice the cloaked ships.   I do understand that there's a lesson in there about following orders, even if said orders come from a pretty face in a pretty dress, but that's kind of an out-of-universe reason. What was Holdo's reasoning? Surely she knew enough about Poe to realize that treating him like a mushroom1 would not result in anything good.  1 "kept in the dark and fed shit" Hypothetical party:  1st level human wizard (PC) 3x guard NPC 1x acolyte NPC    This is the player's first time, and it's a solo campaign. The first mini-adventure involves recovering the cargo of a supply caravan that didn't make it to her magic academy due to bandit hijacking (as a sort of graduate-test). The guards and healer are on contract from the school to assist her. The acolyte is essentially just to hang back and tend to wounds and probably won't engage in combat unless someone goes down or the PC is seriously wounded.  So, with that "party" makeup, how do I determine the XP budget for a "medium" or "hard" encounter since there's no clear CR->level mapping in 5e for those NPCs (who will certainly factor into any combat as meatshields and melee damage)? I was thinking about reverse-engineering them as crumby lvl2 fighters (given the 2 HD worth of HP they have), but they certainly aren't on par with a lvl2 fighter, given the lack of action surge, second wind, etc., so the encounters would end up being too hard compared to PCs or DMPCs.   Could they be lvl1-equivalents, essentially trading any abilities a PC would have for extra HP? How would this work at later levels with higher CR NPCs (veteran, priest, mage, etc.)? I'd rather not have to build a bunch of DMPCs as hirelings, because I want the NPCs to be a bit vanilla compared to the versatility of my player. I'm already introducing 1-2 DMPCs to the game for her to take control over as she gets a feel for the flow of the game (for now, she'll handle them out of combat, and I'll effectively show her how to utilize them until she's ready).     Just to be clear, I'm comfortable with the monster-generation rules for crafting NPCs as enemies to determine their CR, but I'm confused on how to use them in the adventuring party when budgeting encounter difficulty XP. "pros and cons", "black and white", "ups and downs". Always in a fixed sequence, is there a word or phrase for these? Is there a word or phrase for two nouns or adjectives joined by a conjunction (usually "and") in a fixed sequence?        alive and well           fast and furious   hat and gloves   pen and pencil   law and order   wit and wisdom   salt and pepper   bacon and eggs   horse and carriage   Adam and Eve   ladies and gentlemen   loud and clear   heads or tails   yes or no   dead or alive What's the deepest reason why QCD bound states have integer charge? What's the deepest reason why QCD bound states have integer electric charge, i.e. equal to an integer times the electron charge?  Given that the quarks have the fractional electric charges they do, this is a consequence of color confinement. The charges of the quarks are constrained in the context of the standard model by anomaly cancellation, and can be explained by grand unification. The GUT explanation for the charges doesn't care about the bound state spectrum of the QCD sector, so it just seems to be a coincidence that hadrons (which are composite) have integer charge, and that leptons (which are elementary) also have integer charge.   Now maybe there's some anthropic argument for why such a coincidence is useful (in the case of proton and electron, it gives us atoms as we know them). Or maybe you can argue that GUTs naturally produce fractionally charged particles and strongly coupled sectors, and it's just not much of a coincidence.   But I remain curious as to whether Seiberg duality, anyons, some UV/IR relationship... could really produce something like the lepton-hadron charge coincidence, for deeper reasons. I suppose one is looking for a theory in which properties of bound states in one sector have a direct and nontrivial relationship to properties of elementary states in another sector. Is there anything like this out there?   (This question was prompted by muster-mark's many recent questions about fractional charge, and by a  that the hadron-lepton charge coincidence is a "semi-coincidence", which assured me that I wasn't overlooking some obvious explanation.) Interesting property of finite integer sequence with sum 1