MTG Curse of misfortune Recently I made a deck to have fun with when I play with family/friends. So I played  on target player, and he simply didn't understand the card, saying "Why did you cast this on me? when I don't have any curses in my deck? You're supposed to cast it on yourself so that you can use it." So I told him why would I want to curse myself? and add more curses to myself? So he then asks "I don't understand this card. Henceforth I won't be getting any curses from this card unless you can prove it" I tried to explain it by telling him that I get to pull curses from my deck and give it to him. And that there is a difference between this curse and other curses, because the other curses say Enchanted player gets this and that. While Curse of misfortune doesn't say any of that so it means that I get the ability of that card to place curses on him. So he simply said the same thing and didn't understand it. So I questioned myself too, therefore me asking this to you guys.  Another question, If I play curses on players, are those enchanted cards still considered mine? Ex. I play a curse on target players, and I have  out, and a player attacks me. Do they have to tap as many mana to as many curses I've given?
Ordeal of Heliod and changing creature control Here is the situation that came up:  Player 1 controls a creature enchanted with  and two +1/+1 counters. On Player 2's turn, they cast  to take control of the creature, and then attack with it. The attack triggers the Ordeal, putting another +1/+1 counter on it. Now that it has three counters, it is sacrificed and a player gains 10 life.  Which player sacrifices the enchantment and gains 10 life? The controller of the creature (Player 2) or the player who cast the enchantment (Player 1)?
How can I solve "Be aware that removing the lock file is not a solution and may break your system"? I did: sudo apt-get update  I got this: Reading package lists... Done E: Could not get lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock. It is held by process 1131 (packagekitd)  N: Be aware that removing the lock file is not a solution and may break your system.  E: Unable to lock directory /var/lib/apt/lists/  I used to just remove the lock file, but I've never seen that note before (did it break my system?)?? What do I do? Where should the period be put when an entire sentence is quoted at the end of a sentence? As in the following:     A common proverb is: “A rolling stone gathers no moss.”        A common proverb is: “A rolling stone gathers no moss”.        A common proverb is: “A rolling stone gathers no moss.”.   If the proverb weren't a full sentence, I would immediately put a single period after the quote, at the very end.  But if it is a sentence, which period should be removed so that there is only one period? Two periods look absolutely dorky. Put   $$ l^{\infty} = \{ (x_n) \subseteq \mathbb{C} : \forall j \; \;\ \;|x_j| \leq C(x)\} $$  I want to show that $c_0$, the space of all sequences of scalars that converges to $0$ is closed subspace of $l^{\infty}$.  MY atttemt: Take arbitrary sequence $(x_n) \in c_0$. We know $x_n \to 0$. but $0 \in c_0$. Therefore, every sequence in $c_0$ converges to an element in $c_0$. Hence, $c_0$ must be closed  Is this correct? thanks Is it true that $0.999999999\ldots=1$? I'm told by smart people that $$0.999999999\ldots=1$$ and I believe them, but is there a proof that explains why this is? Having the derivative be an operator Short circuit or disconnect to bypass a compressor I have an Altec Lansing ATP3 2.1 audio system PCB which I reverse-engineered, and I would like to bypass the JFET compressor that's on it. Its active components are a JFET and four op-amps. I will connect the input to the output so it gets forwarded to the next stage.  My question is: should I disconnect the input and output from the compressor (in that case should I remove power supply as well, which would be very annoying), or can I leave it connected but short-circuited?  The block I want to short-circuit is the pink one on the left.    I realize the image is very small. The sound comes in on the right, in the green box. In the middle yellow box there's some trebble/volume/bass control. The small green box on its left merges the left and right channels to forward it to the subwoofer section, which is the complete left half of this diagram (except the red box on the left, which is just power). Signal then goes through a low-pass, a small equalizer and a compressor (the big purple box). It finally gets amplified in the brown power amp. If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? When the big bang happened where did it occur?  When the big bang happened how did it occur?  Where did the energy come from? Energy can not be created or destroyed does that mean, energy has existed before the universe was here? Has anyone ever booked a flight with ?  I am just wondering where they get their prices and data from, and if I might find a cheaper flight by using something like Expedia or Travelocity. Preventing hyphenation of specific short, repeated, hyphenated words Evaluating $\int \frac{1}{{x^4+1}} dx$ Tracking disk I/O by application in Windows? Is there a utility for Windows that operates similarly to iotop for Linux?  I'm looking for simple tool that can tell me what applications are writing to disk and how much they're actually writing. Creating a query that uses criteria from two tables? Can't start ubuntu-desktop after upgrade to 18.04 After the restart step of upgrading Ubuntu to 18.04, tty is opening instead ubuntu-desktop. And when I enter my login name and password, I am still in the tty. This is happening again in every restart. How can I start the graphical desktop as normal? SQL Join Differences What's difference between inner join and outer join (left join,right join), and which has the best performance of them?  Thanks! Condition on a,b and c satisfying an equation(TIFR GS 2017) Let $a,b,c$ be positive real numbers satisfying $$(1+a+b+c)\left(1+\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\right)=16,$$ then $a+b+c=3$.  I thought about the application of the AM-GM-HM inequality, but in vain. I also thought about splitting 16 into factors and comparing but went nowhere. Any ideas. Thanks beforehand. Why couldn't Harry see Thestrals at the end of Goblet of Fire after the senseless and shocking death of Cedric Diggory?   At the end of Goblet of Fire, the carriages still appeared horseless to Harry:     Hermione turned away, smiling at the horseless carriages which were now trundling towards them up the drive, as Krum, looking surprised, but gratified, signed a fragment of   parchment for Ron.   Goblet of Fire - Page 629 - British Hardcover - Adult Edition   At the beginning of Order of the Phoenix, Harry sees the Thestrals for the first time:     Here stood the hundred or so horseless stagecoaches that always took the students above first year up to the castle. Harry glanced quickly at them, turned away to keep a lookout for Ron and Hermione, then did a double-take.   The coaches were no longer horseless. There were creatures standing between the carriage shafts.   Order of the Phoenix - Page 178 - British Hardcover - Adult Edition   We know that only those who have seen death can see Thestrals:     ‘Don’ worry, it won’ hurt yeh,’ said Hagrid patiently. ‘Righ’, now, who can tell me why some o’ yeh can see ’em an’ some can’t?’   Hermione raised her hand.   ‘Go on then,’ said Hagrid, beaming at her.   ‘The only people who can see Thestrals,’ she said, ‘are people who have seen death.’   ‘Tha’s exactly right,’ said Hagrid solemnly [...]   Order of the Phoenix - Page 394 - British Hardcover - Adult Edition   A month went by between Cedric's death and the end of the spring term -- is this enough time for Harry to have truly internalized Cedric's death? Goblet of Fire indicates that Harry was in shock following Cedric's murder, but was able to relate the story of Cedric's death to Mr. and Mrs. Diggory.     When he looked back, even a month later, Harry found he had few memories of the following days. It was as though he had been through too much to take in any more. The recollections he did have were very painful. The worst, perhaps, was the meeting with the Diggorys that took place the following morning.   [...]   ‘He suffered very little, then,’ she said, when Harry had told her how Cedric had died.'   Goblet of Fire - Page 621 - British Hardcover - Adult Edition   So, then, why couldn't Harry see Thestrals at the end of Goblet of Fire? Question  The test scores of three groups of people are saved as separate vectors in R.  set.seed(1) group1 &lt;- rnorm(100, mean = 75, sd = 10) group2 &lt;- rnorm(100, mean = 85, sd = 10) group3 &lt;- rnorm(100, mean = 95, sd = 10)   I want to know if there is a significant difference in the medians between these groups. I know that I could test group 1 versus group 2 using the Wilcoxon test, like so.  wilcox.test(group1, group2)   However, this compares only two groups at a time, and I would like to compare all three simultaneously. I would like a statistical test that yields a p value at the 0.05 significance level. Could someone please help?  Edit #1 - Mood's median test  Following user Hibernating's suggested answer, I tried Mood's median test.  median.test &lt;- function(x, y){     z &lt;- c(x, y)     g &lt;- rep(1:2, c(length(x), length(y)))     m &lt;- median(z)     fisher.test(z &lt; m, g)$p.value }  median.test(group1, group2)   However, this approach allows me to test for a significant difference between the medians of only two groups at a time. I am not sure of how to use it to compare the medians of all three simultaneously.  Edit #2 - Kruskal-Wallis test  User dmartin's suggested answer appears to be more or less what I need, and allows me to test all three groups simultaneously.  kruskal.test(list(group1, group2, group3))   Edit #3  User Greg Snow helpfully notes in his answer that the Kruskal-Wallis test is appropriate as long as it makes strict assumptions that make it also a test of means. MySQL Query GROUP BY day / month / year Can I enter the UK with a Schengen visa? The Monty Hall Problem - where does our intuition fail us?