so I try to use a string variable in the if statement but it seems it doesn't work like int and double and other primitive data types, why? Pls help my code: import java.util.Scanner; public class Something{    static void Some(){       Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);       String answer;              System.out.println(&quot;Hello Sir, what can I do for you?&quot;);       answer = input.nextLine();              String i = &quot;2&quot;;              if(answer == i){          System.out.println(&quot;Sure Sir &quot;);       }              else{          System.out.println(&quot;Sir, anything?&quot;);       }    }      public static void main(String [] args){       Some();    } }  input:2 output: Sir, anything?
I've been using the == operator in my program to compare all my strings so far. However, I ran into a bug, changed one of them into .equals() instead, and it fixed the bug.  Is == bad? When should it and should it not be used? What's the difference?
Help, i tried installing kaltools and my Ubuntu is messed up! I tried installing Kali Linux tools.  I started installing some tools and there were several things I had to "agree" to and one message said add users... something in terminal, and when I came back I saw terminal reporting removing a bunch of core programs that I needed. I canceled the process but I don't know if I should reinstall Ubuntu or not.  How can I repair my system? Expansion of $(1+px+qx^2)^8\equiv 1+8x+52x^2+kx^3$... $(1+px+qx^2)^8 \equiv  1+8x+52x^2+kx^3...$  Given that expression, calculate the values of p, q, and k.  I'm guessing this is a trinomial that needs to be turned into a binomial, but how would you do it? I have no idea. Does $k+\aleph_0=\mathfrak{c}$ imply $k=\mathfrak{c}$ without the Axiom of Choice? Trouble with proving $A$ is an integrally closed domain $\Rightarrow$ $A[t]$ is integrally closed domain MacBook Pro locked with Find My Mac and won't let me boot Voldemort ordered Nagini to kill Snape in hopes of claiming the Elder Wand's ownership.  Let's suppose that Snape was indeed the owner.  In this scenario, would the Elder Wand's ownership truly pass to Voldemort?  I ask this because, after all, the one who overpowered Snape was Nagini, not Voldemort.   Voldemort ordered Nagini to kill Snape. However, this would be equivalent to ordering a Death Eater to kill Snape, in which case the Death Eater would gain the ownership - in a similar manner, Nagini is the murderer. Nagini isn't a "spell": remember how Draco summoned a snake to attack Harry back at CoS? If that snake kills Harry, I'd imagine that Draco gains the ownership (if Harry had the Elder Wand) because that snake was a "spell" casted by Draco - but this time is different, because Nagini isn't a "spell" casted by Voldemort, but rather an actual third-party creature.   The curious thing is that Voldemort did cast some sort of spell (he flicked his wand), which I think caused Nagini's barrier to break so Nagini could kill Snape. In some way, Voldemort did provoke Snape's death - however, it was mostly indirectly.  So, would the ownership pass to Nagini or to Voldemort? If it passes to Nagini, would the Elder Wand's "ownership cycle" end, or would it continue if Voldemort decides to kill Nagini?    The simplified version of this question is: if an animal kills the owner of the Elder Wand, what happens to its ownership? I've found  many queries to check edit counts, and I get different results for each one. Which one is the most accurate and up-to-date query? Or is there any way to see the edit count in stats? Book: Handful of children kept in a school as political mythological prisoners I am trying to write a bash script for testing that takes a parameter and sends it through curl to web site.  I need to url encode the value to make sure that special characters are processed properly.  What is the best way to do this?    Here is my basic script so far:  #!/bin/bash host=${1:?'bad host'} value=$2 shift shift curl -v -d "param=${value}" http://${host}/somepath $@ How many of Trelawney's prophecies have come true? I will go to France from 17/12/13 – 19/12/13, then I will come back to London. And again I will go back to Portugal and Spain from 26/12/13 to 03/01/14 which I will stay in Spain for the longest period. However, the Spanish consulate told me that I have to request for the visa from the French consulate.  The point is: Do I need to apply for a visa for a single trip two times (from French and Spanish consulate) or a single visa for multiple time (from French consulate). What equipment and settings do I use for panning shots of moving objects? How to draw circle tangents and removing the inner lines? I'm new to Adobe Illustrator and I wanted to accomplish this task. How do I remove the inner lines in my drawings? I tried with all the pathfinders effect but it keeps removing my tangent lines (the lines connecting both my circles).    It works like a charm as I followed the selected's answer guide:  Here it is. If I were to use the sentence "There are lots of John Smiths" in the world, would that be the correct use for saying that there are a lot of people named John Smith in the world?  I don't think there should be an apostrophe as that would imply ownership of something.  If my first example is correct, then what would you do if the name referenced already ended with an 's'? How can I get back to Blender's default theme? It is common to see things described as the &quot;gold standard&quot;. It means that something is the best and is the ideal against which other things are to be compared; it cannot be superseded. I often , where a certain diagnostic test (e.g., the nasopharyngeal swab PCR test for infection with the Coronavirus causing COVID-19) is considered the most accurate and then other tests (e.g., cheaper or faster tests) are then evaluated against this benchmark. The etymology is covered in . In short, it is derived from the . Thus gold was the thing against which the value of all other currencies was measured. I don't like this term and would like to avoid using it. First, the desired meaning is not predominant; if you  you will mostly get results for the monetary system, not the more general phrase. Second, the etymology is outdated; the original meaning of the term now has the opposite connotation. The monetary gold standard was abandoned in the 1970s. Economists consider the gold standard to be a bad monetary system. Thus, if you are interested in economics and history, the term &quot;gold standard&quot; actually is associated with being outdated and flawed -- which is close to the opposite of the intended meaning. (Of course, many people are unaware of the original meaning of the term. ) (A note in response to comments: Why I want to avoid this term is relevant, but not essential, to the question. If you don't see a problem with the term, the question can be answered regardless.) My question: Is there a better phrase to use in place of &quot;gold standard&quot;? For example, what term could be used in a medical study comparing a new diagnostic test against the gold standard test? I'm not aware of any good substitute that has essentially the same meaning. Here are two example sentences where I would like a replacement:   A nasal swab is the gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19.     The  served as the gold standard for all scales from 1889 until 2019.   The best substitute I can think of is &quot;official,&quot; as in &quot;a nasal swab is the official way to diagnose COVID-19&quot;. &quot;Official&quot; implies some form of uniqueness. But &quot;official&quot; implies the existence of some authority that gives it this designation (as opposed to scientific consensus). A  asks for a &quot;perhaps humorous&quot; alternative -- the suggestion there, &quot;mother of all&quot;, is not appropriate here. (There is also .)  In response to the answers and comments doubting the premise of this question: I personally have a negative association with the phrase &quot;gold standard&quot; because I know people who advocate for returning to the gold standard or its modern equivalent, , and have discussed the topic at length. Several  US  continue to advocate for a return to the gold standard. Thus asserting that no one will interpret the phrase in terms of monetary policy is simply not convincing. Excluding empty(Null) fields when using EntityFieldQuery query condition Prove $\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac {\sin(x)}{x} = 1$ with the epsilon-delta definition of limit. It is well known that   $$\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac {\sin(x)}{x} = 1$$  I know several proofs of this: the geometric proof shows that $\cos(\theta)\leq\frac {\sin(\theta)}{\theta}\leq1$ and using the Squeeze Theorem I conclude that $\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac {\sin(x)}{x} = 1$, other proof uses the Maclaurin series of $\sin(x)$. My question is: is there a demonstration of this limit using the epsilon-delta definition of limit? Bibliography per chapter with continuous numbering I would like to create a document with two chapters. After the first chapter there should be a bibliography. The next chapter should be able to reference items of the former chapter, but only show the new items in its bibliography, starting with the next number from the first bibliography.  Example:     Chapter 1 - The Fu   Fu has been done by Bar [1]. Early versions ...   Bibliography   [1] Bar et. al., Doning the Fu      Chapter 2 - Compining Fu with Herp   Doning Fu as described in [1]   neglects the advantages of Herp pointed out by Derp [2].   Consequently ....   Bibliography   [2] Derp et. al., The Advantages of Using Herp   Please not too much discussion about if that is a friendly-to-use idea, it is not my own demand :) How does the unit circle work for trigonometric ratios of obtuse angles? I know that the x coordinate is $cos (\theta )$ and the y coordinate is $sin (\theta )$. But I understand these in context of only acute angles? I don't understand why the unit circle definition works for other than acute angles? Somebody please provide me some good intuition.