Here is my node, anything wrong? But my authors and addresses do not show. Thanks.   \documentclass[11pt,oneside,english]{amsart}  \usepackage{authblk}  \@ifundefined{showcaptionsetup}{}{%  \PassOptionsToPackage{caption=false}{subfig}} \usepackage{subfig} \makeatother  \usepackage{babel} %\usepackage{csquotes} %\usepackage[style=apa]{biblatex} %\DeclareLanguageMapping{american}{american-apa}  \title{Forming Competitively Balanced Teams}  \author[1]{ABC} \author[2]{DEF}  \affil[1]{School1 \\ Email: abc@school1.edu} \affil[2]{School2\\ Email: def@school2.edu \\ }  \begin{document} \begin{abstract} adfadf \end{abstract}  \section{aaa} \section{bbb}  \end{document}
I am new to the amsart document class. For some reasons \author (etc..) is not showing after I use \maketitle. This is my tex:  \documentclass[12pt,reqno,a4paper]{amsart}  \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{mathrsfs}  \usepackage{amsthm}  \usepackage{latexsym}  \usepackage{pictexwd} \usepackage{pdftricks} \usepackage{natbib} \usepackage{setspace} \usepackage{color} \usepackage[affil-it]{authblk}  \begin{document}  \title{Temptation, Asymmetric information and Committment}  \author{Mark}  \affil{University of Leicester}  \date{February 2014}  \maketitle  \begin{abstract} To be written \end{abstract}  \section{introduction}  ...  \end{document}   and this is the output:   can anybody help me out?
Move item to folder when added/edited (SP2013 or O365) How to move item to folder automatically when it has been added or edited in a library? The folder is in the same library. The correct folder will be defined by metadata. This should happen automatically when the item has been added or edited. The listitem Id should be preserved. No server-side code should be deployed.  Can this be done using workflows (SP2010/SP2013)? If not then what would be the other options? How to modify function argument? Integer solutions to combinations of floating point numbers Imagine two kids each sitting in the center of their own tilt-a whirl®, each holding steady a flashlight (or laser) whose beam is parallel to the deck.  Each machine rotates and precesses (we'll leave out nutation) at different, real, rates.  How do we determine the least number of rotations to alignment, for each kid. If you prefer another analogy: Saturn and Jupiter orbit with different (real) periods.  How many orbits for each until conjunction in precisely the same position in space?  Simplify by assuming circular, observer-centric, orbits. specifically solutions to: aC1 + bC2 = N where a, b, N are positive integers of your own choosing and C1, C2 are constant, unique, positive, non-integer(real) numbers where C1 &lt; C2. I am hoping to avoid rigorous computational methods involving modulus tests. Hope I clarified the ambiguities. Thanks, @DonThousand the Bezout identity looks interesting. Find a combinatorial argument for the following binomial identity:   $$n(n+1)2^{n-2} = \sum_{k=1}^{n}k^2\binom{n}{k} .$$   Algebraic proofs can be found at  , and a related identity at  . Complete Installation Guide for Android SDK / ADT Bundle on Ubuntu What all needs to be done to install Android SDK / ADT Bundle on Ubuntu?  Each of the steps in the answer was found on some different forum as I encountered obstacles getting started with my Android SDK and posted questions in appropriate forums thereafter. So I thought this would be useful in that it is a one stop solution available, in case one ever needs to re-install Ubuntu and install the Android SDK / ADT Bundle from scratch! How to correctly add a path to PATH? Hard disk file system is shown as Raw file system; how can I access it? How to prove this limit composition theorem? This may be a generic OOP question. I wanted to do a generic comparison between an interface and an abstract class on the basis of their usage.   When would one want to use an interface and when would one want to use an abstract class? The units of $\mathbb Z[\sqrt{2}]$ Please let me know how to change the size of the camera view. The red dotted line of the square is too small for me. to infinitive as direct object?! (as in : I promised to get there in time.) I'm a passionate Korean English-learner, and I would like to ask you a question about grammar.   It was 3 years ago when I first started to study the to-infinitive as studying grammar with Grammar In Use series and English Grammar series by Longman, having been exposed to English for 3 years. There wasn't any mention of the author saying that the usage of the to-infinitive is as an (direct) object. And for me also, the times I have encountered sentences in which the usage of the to-infinitive, so to speak, as direct objects were used, I've read them as some kind of obligatory adverbial that shows what the verbs are about, not as objects, which means they are noun phases! 100% of Korean textbooks say the usage is as a direct object, but I doubt it. I think it's some kind of obligatory adverbial that shows what the verbs are about.    I thought it was better for me to ask Americans themselves. Do you read this usage of to-infinitive as a noun phrase or an adverbial? Difference between float and decimal data type Using apt-get to remove packages and dependencies Consider the sequence defined by $a_1 = \sqrt{2}$, $a_2 = \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2}}$, so that in general, $a_n = \sqrt{2 + a_{n - 1}}$ for $n &gt; 1$. I know 2 is an upper bound of this sequence (I proved this by induction). Is there a way to show that this sequence converges to 2? What I think is that the key step is to prove 2 is the least upper bound of this sequence. But how? Is flair tab working correctly? Is the flair tab working correctly?  It is counting aproximately 3 times more points and over 2 times more bronze badges at the time I'm posting it. Is there a way to access wifi in Zurich airport without a phone service? I am traveling through Zurich and have a phone without any roaming there; I'm planning on picking up a SIM once I get to my final destination. Last time I was there, I couldn't access the airport wifi because it required a code sent via SMS.    In the event I need to contact someone or coordinate about flight delays, is there some alternate way to get wifi access? How do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering? Is there a way to make an Oracle query behave like it contains a MySQL limit clause? In MySQL, I can do this: select *  from sometable order by name limit 20,10  to get the 21st to the 30th rows (skip the first 20, give the next 10). The rows are selected after the order by, so it really starts on the 20th name alphabetically. In Oracle, the only thing people mention is the rownum pseudo-column, but it is evaluated before order by, which means this: select *  from sometable where rownum &lt;= 10 order by name  will return a random set of ten rows ordered by name, which is not usually what I want. It also doesn't allow for specifying an offset. Group cohomology intuition Group cohomology is one thing I don't seem to get my head around.  I understand $H^0$ as being the "fixed points" but when it comes to anything higher I have no idea what the notions are meant to be capturing...if anything.  For example I can see that 1-cocycles are homomorphisms with a specific property but that property doesn't seem to mean anything to me...and I think it should!  Is there an intuition or example that explains the meaning or is it just something that "stuck" and seems to work in lots of places? So...as what do we close too localized questions now? So we got  which works very well and is very nice and handy. But there is one question left, as what do we close ?  It actually helps , "too localized" was removed because it was misused most of the time:     5(A). "Too Localized" is no longer necessary since the specific   off-topic reasons now address its main use case. (new)      Too Localized was, by far, the most misused close reason in our   surveys, with both Community Managers and Moderators deeming over 50%   of randomly sampled TL closures to not have merited closure (including   on SO).      Today, TL is used helpfully on code dump questions on SO, but the new   OT reasons are where this is now correctly addressed. SO can use   "Large blocks of code with requests for debugging without meaningful   supporting info" as a specific OT reason.   But the new dialog leaves us with only four options:        Programming questions are off-topic on Meta Stack Overflow.   This question does not appear to seek input and discussion from the community. If you have encountered a problem on one of our sites, please describe it in detail.   Changes to the system or to the circumstances affecting the asker have rendered it obsolete. If you encounter a similar problem, please post a new question.   Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)      Only the "other" reason does very well fit on "too localized" questions now, doe we close it with that?