I've seen questions about if fighting damage is combat damage, but I don't think this is the same thing. The other questions I saw were asking if fight damage will trigger combat abilities. They say they're separate from each other, and nothing in the official rules say anything about my dilemma.  My question involves a . When it's played, it will fight target creature, like . Because it's fighting, it triggers its second ability to give it two +1/+1 counters at the next end step.  So my question is, will creatures attacking during the combat step trigger the Foe-Razer Regent's second ability? Or will it only be things like Savage Punch, where it says fight.
The text for  says:     {1}{G}, {T} : Target creature you control fights another target creature. (Each deals damage equal to its power to the other.)   Does this have anything to do with combat? Or is it just direct damage between two creatures? For example, can one of the creatures have defender? Or what if one of them is tapped?   I've been assuming it is more like the damage dealt by a .  Also: are the two creatures then “tapped” until their next untap step? ie: could you use Ulenvald Tracker to make two creatures fight in your pre-combat step, then enter the combat phase with a creature who just “fought” untapped? Could you make two creatures fight who are both tapped?
What are exchanges like "How are you," "I'm fine," and "See you later" called? I've noticed confusing definitions about permutation and substitution, preventing me from understanding the difference.  A permutation changes the order of distinct elements of a set, but this can be written as a function changing one element by another, exactly as a substitution.  So, how exactly can we distinguish between these two notions?  This question is interesting since we have these two notions in block ciphers, in which S-boxes perform substitution. The problem is that this table is used to replace one element by another, exactly like a permutation. Ethernet Without Magnetics? How / can you connect Ethernet devices together without magnetics? How do you wire it up? What sorts of practical limitations are there on doing this?  To clarify, I'm not trying to connect two computers here. I'm thinking specifically of creating a small network of microcontrollers on a single board. Lets say the total length of a network segment is no longer than 6 inches. This would be for 10BaseT or at most 100BaseT. I have a HP 14-AN001NA laptop. It came with Windows 10 installed on which the Wi-Fi worked fine anywhere in the house.   However I removed Windows 10 and installed Ubuntu 16.04 instead and since I have had terrible Wi-Fi anywhere aside from about three foot away from the router. I don't know if it's relevant but my Wi-Fi is not called wlan0 but wlo1 for some reason (I didn't change it).  When running lspci -knn | grep Net -A3     I get the following output:  05:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8723BE PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [10ec:b723] DeviceName:   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company RTL8723BE PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [103c:81c1] Kernel driver in use: rtl8723be Kernel modules: wl, rtl8723be Why don't researchers request payment for refereeing? I understand that the Istari - the only other Maiar besides the Balrog to come into close proximity to the Ring - are constrained within a mortal body and subject to its mortal weaknesses, which renders them vulnerable to the Ring's domination and corruption. However, what is to stop Gandalf from returning to his true form, picking up the Ring, and just walking all the way to Mount Doom? Sauron is too weak at the time; he would have been able to do nothing but watch helplessly and pray his mortal armies can defeat a Ring-bearing Gandalf.  Is Gandalf's decision to abide by the Valar's will to the end the only thing holding him back from this particular option? Are there enchantments in place to disable his ability to revert to Maia form, such that the option was never there to begin with? Or would he, even in Maia form and free of mortal weaknesses, still be vulnerable to domination and corruption by the Ring?  The One Ring is forged with the essence of Sauron to dominate and rule the minds of lesser beings. However, Sauron is only a Maia - albeit the highest-ranking in Morgoth's following. Fellow Maiar would be his equal (at least in rank), while the Valar are certainly superior in power to him. If an Ainu becomes a Ringbearer, will he/she eventually fall to Sauron's will too, or at least succumb to the corruption of the Ring's dark power? A sequence of real numbers such that $\lim_{n\to+\infty}|x_n-x_{n+1}|=0$ but it is not Cauchy Why is the decay of a neutral rho meson into two neutral pions forbidden? Single service account running all SQL Servers Is there any negative performance impact for using the same service account and agent account to run SQL Server and SQL Agent respectively for all SQL server instances running at a small company of say 35 servers? The biggest database is 0.5 GB. any suggestions are welcome. Thank you. Reference: What is variable scope, which variables are accessible from where and what are "undefined variable" errors? Before I met her I had a poor opinion of her.   As person had a poor opinion before a particular time in past (before He met her) so I think there should be had had.   There are some more example like this:   Before I went to the university, I worked/had worked as a carpenter for 5 years. Before I opened the door, I put/had put the key in the lock. Before I opened the door, I looked/had looked carefully into the barn for snipers.   In all these sentence, for me, it should be perfect tense.  I asked that question on another platform where I was told that if sequence of past event is obvious and sentences uses "before"and "after", we often use past tense. Which means we should use past tense in all these sentences. But I have another sentence "The train had left before I reached the station." If I follow above mentioned rule there should be "left" instead of "had left". But I am damn sure this sentence is correct with "had left".   Am I correct?  Thank you Derivation of $E=pc$ for a massless particle? In classical mechanics, massless particles don't exist because for $m=0$, $p=0$.  The relativistic relation between energy, mass and spatial momentum is: $E^2= (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2$ . So it is said that setting $m=0$ in the first equation you get $E=pc$.  How could setting $m=0$ in that equation give you $E=pc$ whilst $p$ appears in the equation and we know $p=γmu$? If you set $m=0$ you will have indeterminacy due to "$γm$". It seems to me like we are doing a "trick" in order to get the $E=pc$. Perhaps there is another proof for this relation? Will getting a Software Testing Certification benefit me in my career? I found the below in  web-site:     We use much in questions and negative clauses to talk about degrees of something.      We don’t use much in affirmative clauses.   Also, it the same web-site, I found the following:     She runs much faster than he does.    also I noticed that some web-sites use much with affirmative clauses:     May we all be having this much fun and getting this much exercise when we're his age!    Is it Okey to use much in affirmative clauses? If yes, when can we use it? and what is the rules?  Update:  Here is another example on how often the word "much" is used  in informal style:     After much consideration I will NOT be performing at the Inauguration with my improv group Capitol Hill-arious Maximal ideals in the ring of real functions on $[0,1]$ Let $S$ be the ring of all continuous functions from $[0,1]$ to $\mathbb R$. How to prove that all maximal ideals of $S$ have the form $M_{x_0}=\{f\in S \mid f(x_0)=0\}$?   Thanks in advance. How can I require a generic parameter to be an enum that implements an interface? How to calculate what this power series converges against? (double factorials) ascending/descending in LINQ - can one change the order via parameter? biblatex: Full Citations in Footnotes on Every Page How can I create this sort of bibliography using biblatex, ie, bibliography at the footer of every page? How can we prevent "assembly" tag being tagged to .NET assembly question I am seeing this happen again and again. Sometimes people tag the .NET and C# questions with "assembly" tag while in reality it belongs for Assembly programming questions.