Instead of using the window.open command in javascript -- which only creates a pop-up window -- how would someone use javascript to reassign the URL to a completely new area?
How can I redirect the user from one page to another using jQuery or pure JavaScript?
Do hit points reset upon each use of wild shape even if the same form's assumed? Let's say I've used wild shape to assume the form of a mammoth that has 126 hit points. I take 26 points of damage, putting me at 100 hit points. If I use my next turn to take a bonus action to exit wild shape then an action to use wild shape to assume the form of a mammoth again, do I now have 126 hit points or 100 hit points? What differences exist between third-party and official lenses for Canon APS-C DSLRs? I am just another guy who just taken up photography as a social hobby who enjoys taking pics of everyday life, social events / parties &amp; some portraits. Need camera for short overseas trip (2-3 times a year), maybe some landscape pics.   I have done some research and have come up a list of main lenses that I am considering and hope you guys can offer some advice / comments to whether I should make those purchases.   Main reason why I chose "third party lenses" 'cos apparently they cost less, newer and are "award winning" - so I don't see the point of spending more for the original canon lens (which some maybe quite old - ie 3-5 yrs).   Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM Lens (day to day lens) Sigma 85mm F1.4 EX DG HSM (for portrait &amp; bokeh effects) Wide angle lens (any suggestions)   Main questions / comments please...   Q1) What do you think of the lens choices that I have decided to build my kit?  Q2) Any wide angle lens that you will recommend? (third party or canon) or should I get wide angle zoom lens ? Q3) What are your thoughts that I chose all my lens from Third Party instead of Official Canon ones... is that a "smart move"? Why teach linear algebra before abstract algebra? Is there a reason why most undergraduate curriculums put linear algebra before abstract algebra?  I'm asking this because personally it seems to be much easier to understand the architecture behind linear algebra as supposed to simply solving problems after a course in abstract algebra. Is there a difference between them? If so, how and when are they used?  For example:     I fixed a little/small typo. The game  has a very unique intro that I would like to show my friend again for the first time. I'm not sure how to reset all my progress on this game to achieve this though. Any thoughts? I see stuff like command 1&gt; out or with 2&gt;&amp;1 to redirect stderr, but sometimes I also see &amp;&gt; by itself, etc.  What is the best way to understand &amp; and what it means exactly? I remember watching this one show when I was a kid in the 80's/early 90's in Canada. It was a live-action show about these two kids and had some puppet/muppet-like characters, but it kind of had a dark/mysterious element to it. I can't remember too much about it except portions of some episodes, but the main characters were kids, and they had some mysterious artifact (kind of like a compass?) that took them to this other world where there were giants and other mysterious beings that we rarely saw. The two kids weren't the only one's going to this place either, they find out kids from all around the world that also had this same artifact (and they all fit together like a round puzzle?). I seem to recall that the giants in this other world were the ones who made the artifacts, and were dying/or in desperate need of the help of the kids.  A couple episodes I remember:   There was one where the leaves were falling, and the world was doomed to end as soon as the last leaf touched the ground, so they're trying to figure out how to prevent all the leaves from falling, but after a long and suspenseful episode (for a kid) the last leaf dramatically falls, but out of no where the main girl catches the leaf and saves the world (it was very exciting for my young self, and I remember being very impressed with the pretty girl for thinking to catch the leaf).     There was another episode where the kids meet these two old guys with long white hair (muppets) sullenly working in a mine/tunnel, they're in tattered old clothes working away with their pick axes or hammers and they are connected to each other at the beard. This long old white beard grows out of one of their faces right into the other's. The kids save the day by cutting the old guy's beard in the middle, freeing them from each other. They celebrate being free from their bonds and excitedly thank the kids, but after the kids leave they continue to work away, this time in much brighter spirits. Seemingly unbeknownst to them though, as they work, their beards slowly and subtly grow back together.   Anyone else remember this show? Find highest level of a hierarchical field: with vs without CTEs Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry defines an $\mathcal O_X$-module $\mathscr F$ to be quasi-coherent if there is an open affine cover $(U_i=\operatorname{Spec} A_i)_{i\in\mathcal I}$ of $X$ such that each $\mathscr F\rvert_{U_i}$ is isomorphic to the sheaf of modules $\widetilde{M_i}$ associated to some $A_i$-module $M_i$. It is later proved that this is equivalent to the statement that for any open affine $U=\operatorname{Spec} A\subseteq X$, there exists an $A$-module $M$ with $\mathscr F\rvert_U\cong\widetilde M$.  On the other hand, Grothendieck's Éléments de Géométrie Algébrique defines $\mathscr F$ to be quasi-coherent if every point $x\in X$ admits an open neighborhood $U\subseteq X$ such that $\mathscr F\rvert_U$ is isomorphic to the cokernel of a morphism of free $\mathcal O_U$-modules.  Now I wonder how those definitions are equal. I tried proving it by myself, but both directions seem quite nontrivial to me... Any hints? I recently updated my operating system from Ubuntu 13.04 to Ubuntu 13.10. Since then, I am facing difficulties compiling my TeX code in which the french babel package is called. Please note that all my sources were compiling very fine before the system upgrade. However, now, given the following header:   \usepackage[francais]{babel}  I receive the following error:  ! Package babel Error: Unknown option `francais'. Either you misspelled it   What should I do? Please note that if I remove this part of code (\usepackage[francais]{babel}), everything is compiling well. I also tried it with french, and I receive the same result. Thank you in advance for your help.  MINIMUM WORKING EXAMPLE : \documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[francais]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb}  \begin{document} This is a MINIMUM WORKING EXAMPLE. \end{document}   ! Package babel Error: Unknow option `francais'. Either you misspelled it How to derive addition of velocities without the Lorentz transformation? Lorentz contraction and time dilatation can be deduced without Lorentz transformation. Can you deduce also the theorem of    $$w~=~\dfrac{u+v}{1+uv/c^2}$$   without Lorentz transformation? Using just the constancy of light speed. How can I cast artificially darker shadows? I want to make certain shadows more prominent (using Cycles) without further illuminating the rest of the scene.  Example: I have a simple studio with a bowl of fruit and 3-point lighting.  The light looks great so I don't want to change it but I want the bowl to cast a darker shadow on the ground (without dimming the back-light).  Alternatively, and this would be really cool, an anti-light source.  Like a spot light that throws darkness instead of light. (Am I crazy for wanting this?)  Thanks! Noticing that the "Human Verification" image did not show, I found that the src, , shows that sstatic.net is giving an SSL vertificate for *.stackexchange.com.. Minimum distance between the curves $f(x) =e^x$ and $g(x) =\ln x$ What is the minimum distance between the curves $f(x) =e^x$ and $g(x) = \ln x$? I didn't understand how to solve the problem. Please help me. Problem with \printindex. No index created I tried to create an index to a document I write, but when viewing the .pdf output there was no index. Also no error messages were displayed. I managed to find this in the LOG FILE: No file "Actual Document".ind. ("Actual Document.aux") ) Indeed, when I check the folder supposed to have these files, I found only a file Actual Document.idx with all my indices, but no .ind file. Changing the extension .idx to .ind produced an error. Here is what I have written:  \documentclass[12pt]{book} \usepackage{makeidx} \makeindex \begin{document} continuous \index{continuous} \clearpage \printindex \end{document}   What have I done wrong and what is going on with these files? What is the best way to clean the sensor on a interchangeable lens camera (mirrorless or digital SLR)? I've got a couple of spots of dust on the sensor of my Canon 20D. A rocket blower isn't shifting them, and I'm ridiculously scared of some of the more direct methods for cleaning sensors — what methods/systems have you tried, and how successful have they been? How do I add more categories to Mac OS X Finder's sidebar? My Finder sidebar has two categories: Favorites and Devices. How do I add more categories? zeros of a polynomial Given $P(z)=z^6+6z+10$, find how many roots are in each quadrant    I have already seen that $P(z)$ has six different roots, and that none of them are real or of the form $ki$, $k\in \Bbb R$. Since the coefficients of $P(z)$ are real, then it's roots are 3 conjugate pairs, and therefore the possibilities are limited to two.  Defining $f(z)=z^6$, $g(z)=z^6+6z+10$ and applying Rouche in $|z|&lt;2$, $|f(z)-g(z)|&lt;|f(z)|$ I get that all roots are contained in the disc, but how do I go about splitting them into the four quadrants? From what I know about this polynomial, finding zeros in one quadrant is enough to determine the rest, but I'm stuck trying to apply rouche to a quarter circle (basically I'm having trouble finding a suitable f and g) Suppress a biblatex field in only one of split bibliographies? I am aware of \clearfield, \clearlist etc (cf. ) - but I'm really not sure how to apply it in this context:  Say you have a split bibliography (i.e. several calls to \printbibliography in one document). How can you filter a specific field in a bibliography item - but only in one bibliography (i.e. only in one call to \printbibliography)?  For instance, in the MWE below (compiles with pdflatex test.tex &amp;&amp; biber test &amp;&amp; pdflatex test.tex &amp;&amp; pdflatex test.tex), let's say I'd like to filter urldate (i.e. urldate is not typeset) only in the first bibliography - but for the second one, the original/default behavior should be restored (i.e. urldate is typeset). How to I do that?  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{filecontents} \begin{filecontents*}{\jobname.bib} @online{ctan,   title        = {CTAN},   date         = 2006,   url          = {http://www.ctan.org},   subtitle     = {The Comprehensive TeX Archive Network},   urldate      = {2006-10-01},   label        = {CTAN},   langid       = {english},   langidopts   = {variant=american}, } @misc{google,   title        = {Google},   date         = 2007,   url          = {http://www.google.com},   urldate      = {2007-10-01}, } @misc{hotmail,   title        = {Hotmail},   date         = 2008,   url          = {http://www.hotmail.com},   urldate      = {2008-10-01}, } @misc{yahoo,   title        = {Yahoo},   date         = 2009,   url          = {http://www.yahoo.com},   urldate      = {2009-10-01}, } @misc{aol,   title        = {AOL},   date         = 2010,   url          = {http://www.aol.com},   urldate      = {2010-10-01}, } @misc{altavista,   title        = {AltaVista},   date         = 2011,   url          = {http://www.altavista.com},   urldate      = {2011-10-01}, } \end{filecontents*} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[backend=biber,defernumbers=true,style=ieee]{biblatex} \bibliography{\jobname}  \begin{document}  \section{Section 1} \begin{refsection}  Citing some stuff here: first \cite{ctan}, then \cite{google}, and finally \cite{hotmail}.  \printbibliography[sorting=none,section=\therefsection,resetnumbers=true]  \end{refsection}  \section{Section 2} \begin{refsection}  Citing some stuff here: first \cite{yahoo}, then \cite{aol}, and finally \cite{altavista}.  \printbibliography[sorting=none,section=\therefsection,resetnumbers=true]  \end{refsection}  \end{document}   Output: Does each imply the other? If not, does one imply the other? Why/why not?  This issue came up in response to a comment on an answer I posted .  Although google searching the relevant terms didn't produce anything that seemed particularly useful, I did notice  on the math stackexchange. However, I thought that this question was appropriate for this site too.  EDIT after reading the comments  Relative to the math.stackexchange answer I was after something more in depth, covering some of the issues dealt with in . Also, as I see it the math.stackexchange question shows that consistency doesn't imply asymptotically unbiasedness but doesn't explain much if anything about why. The OP there also takes for granted that asymptotic unbiasedness doesn't imply consistency, and thus the sole answerer so far doesn't address why this is.