I noticed there was a lot of posts regarding other Geforce GTX 750 cards however I am not sure if those are compatible with GIGABYTE's card or if they are actually the same product. So apologies in advance if this will be a repeat question.  So I have bought a new Gigabyte Geforce GTX 750 (Model Name: GV-N750OC-2GI) graphics card. I am running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with the latest updates applied. Before I install the card, is this compatible with Ubuntu 14.04 and I should just install the card and away I go, or is there anything special I may need to do?  Will I need to upgrade to 16.04.1?  Thanks in advance!  Update #1: Attempted to use the default drivers (Open drivers version) and it crashes. I am attempting to use the NVidia drivers now.
I've installed Ubuntu 14.04 and I'm experiencing a fuzzy/blurry screen and bad support for multiple screens.  I realized that Ubuntu installs nouveau as default, but I need to install nvidia drivers, so I tried this:   sudo apt-add-repository ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates apt-get update apt-get install nvidia-current apt-get upgrade       Now that nvidia is installed, you need to blacklist the nouveau driver   so it don’t pop out when you will reboot. Create or edit the following   file:  nano /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf       …and add these lines at the end:  blacklist nouveau blacklist lbm-nouveau options nouveau modeset=0 alias nouveau off alias lbm-nouveau off    I checked via the software &amp; updates if nvidia driver got installed successfully, and it says the driver installed is nvidia 304.117  I then tried to run:  lshw -c video | grep 'configuration'   and the result is that the driver is still nouveau:  configuration: driver=nouveau latency=0   So how do I install and use the nvidia drivers?
Should a student be penalized for using a theorem outside of the curriculum? How to uninstall Intel Linux Graphics Installer and revert to default drivers If matrix A is invertible, is it diagonalizable as well? If a matrix A is invertible, then it is diagonalizable. Is it true or false? How to show that $\log (\frac{2a}{1-a^2}+\frac{2b}{1-b^2}+\frac{2c}{1-c^2})= \log\frac{2a}{1-a^2}+ \log \frac{2b}{1-b^2}+ \log \frac{2c}{1-c^2}$ If $\log (a +b +c) =\log a+\log b+\log c$ then show that $$\log \left(\frac{2a}{1-a^2}+\frac{2b}{1-b^2}+\frac{2c}{1-c^2}\right)= \log\frac{2a}{1-a^2}+ \log \frac{2b}{1-b^2}+ \log \frac{2c}{1-c^2}$$  Trial: If put $a=\frac{2a}{1-a^2}$ and the similar we are done. Can we do this in this way? Otherwise how to do. Please help. Suppose that $a_1,a_2, \cdots, a_n$ are $n$ different integers. Then $[(x-a_1)(x-a_2) \cdots (x-a_n)]^2 +1$ is irreducible over $\mathbb Q$.   I've no idea why it is true. Thanks very much. Is there a program equivalent to lint for LaTeX? Is there a program equivalent to lint for LaTeX? (lint checks C code for syntax errors and possible mistakes.) Most MTP () devices show up in Windows File Explorer under their device name or a GUID, but they don't have a drive letter assigned.  How can I access the files on such devices from the command line? Using either cmd.exe or PowerShell. Prove if $f:[a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is integrable, then so is $|f|$ and $\left|\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx\right| \leq \int_{a}^{b}|f(x)|dx$ Prove that if $f:[a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is integrable, then so is $|f|$ and $\left|\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx\right| \leq \int_{a}^{b}|f(x)|dx$   I already proved that |f| is integrable, but how do I show that $|\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx| \leq \int_{a}^{b}|f(x)|dx$   ? Log and natural log If $f: D(0,1)\to \mathbb C$ is holomorphic, then there is a sequence $\{z_n\}$ in $D(0,1)$ such that $|z_n| \to 1$ and $\{f(z_n)\}$ is bounded Does Linux have the capability to use "junctioned" symbolic links? I'm not sure if this is an actual term or not, so let me explain the concept.  I have a git repository containing all my configuration dot files in ~/dotfiles. I use symbolic links into this directory in order to "activate" them. For example, by executing ln -s ~/dotfiles/bash/bash_profile ~/.bash_profile to produce the link:  ~/.bash_profile -&gt; ~/dotfiles/bash/bash_profile   However, I find myself in a situation where I want to combine the contents of multiple files. For example, I want the ~/.bash_profile symbolic link to point to two separate files, one for each project. E.g.:  ~/.bash_profile (1) -&gt; ~/dotfiles/bash/bash_profile (2) -&gt; ~/dotfiles/proj/bash_profile   I know I can simply concatenate the two files (e.g., cat ~/dotfiles/{bash,proj}/bash_profile &gt; ~/.bash_profile), but if I can do the same thing with symbolic links, I would prefer to.  I imagine that if such a feature exists (Nix is pretty huge), then under the hood it would have to map the two different files together, hiding all sorts of complexities under the hood (mapping file offsets of all non-first "mapped" files, locking all files when writing to the junctioned symbolic link, etc, etc).  If such a feature doesn't exist, are there are plans to implement it? Functions vs. patterns I have read this topic:   There, the issue is handling two different generations of PHP (PHP 4 vs PHP 5), but what I need is to make all but one of my server accounts work under 5.3 and just a single domain under 5.2.  I cannot make this through Apache models, and the answer from  does not apply since in my case I can't use a different port - this is a regular website  on the same server. $f$ holomorphic on $D\setminus \{0\}$ and takes no values in $(-\infty,0],$ then $0$ removable If $f$ is holomorphic on $D\setminus \{0\}$ and takes no values in $(-\infty,0]$ then $0$ is a removable singularity.   I thought to prove this by elimination, but I can't really tell anything about the behavior of $f$ around $0$. How can one translate the information about the definition of $f$ in semi-open interval $(-\infty,0]$. Why use a ReentrantLock if one can use synchronized(this)? How can I simulate a slow machine in a VM? What should one look for when buying a used film camera? I'm planning to buy a used Nikon F5.   I have no experience with a film camera and I want to know what all should one be careful of before buying a used film camera and more specifically a Nikon F5. When one should use spacing line \quad or \, To make it simple, I want to highlight a group of tikz nodes like in the following picture    It was borrowed from the . I would like to know which Tikz commands I can use to do the job in order to automatize this task for several trees I have to make. It is important to keep the blending effect of colors like in node g. Here is the MWE also borrowed from :  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{arrows,backgrounds,calc,trees}  \begin{document} \thispagestyle{empty}  \begin{tikzpicture} \node (f) {f}     child { node (g) {g}       child { node (a) {a}     }       child { node (b) {b}     }   }     child { node (h) {h}       child { node (c) {c}     }   }; \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document} Explain why $\mathbb{Z \times Z}$ and $\mathbb{R \times R}$ is not a field and that why any external direct sum of two fields cannot be a field. I believe it has much to do with the lack of every non-zero element having an inverse, however I am having difficulty seeing it.