[Ubuntu 14.04.5 64bits]  I mount an SD card with rw permission, on /mnt/XYZ using a udev rule that also triggers a script using it as storage. If the SD card is not mounted, the script is inhibited.  Everything works well, except I'd like:   the card and its content to be owned not by root:root as is the case now, but by root:admin, (admin is a user group I create for certain admin tasks) them to have ugo rwx permissions of type 640, any folder created on the SD card to have the setgid bit.   When the SD is not mounted I can do as I please with the mount point: /mnt/XYZ has permissions drwxr-s---, and root:admin ownership, just as I want. As soon as I mount the SD card, things change:   the mount point becomes root:root and I cannot change it, the content is also root:root and I cannot change it, I cannot change content files' permissions either, as exemplified by : chown: changing ownership of ‘local.key’: Operation not permitted   Could it have something to do with format (MBR/FAT32) not allowing unix like permission attributes. Reformatting the SD card as NTFS does not help. I have not tries ext4.  I have no  trouble at all with managing permissions and/or attributes for files on ext4 SSD paritions mounted from fstab for instance.   Q: Is ext4 the only solution in this case ?
I have a script that I need to execute on an NTFS partition. The script's permission is set to 600.  I attempted to modify the permissions by running chmod 755 script.sh, which doesn't report a failure or anything - but it also doesn't change the permissions on the file:  $ stat script.sh    File: `script.sh'   Size: 297070      Blocks: 584        IO Block: 4096   regular file Device: 811h/2065d  Inode: 35515       Links: 1 Access: (0600/-rw-------)  Uid: ( 1000/  xxxxxx)   Gid: ( 1000/  xxxxxx) Access: 2010-09-30 14:05:16.041621000 -0700 Modify: 2010-09-30 14:05:05.070157000 -0700 Change: 2010-09-30 14:05:05.070475000 -0700  $ chmod 755 script.sh $ stat script.sh    File: `script.sh'   Size: 297070      Blocks: 584        IO Block: 4096   regular file Device: 811h/2065d  Inode: 35515       Links: 1 Access: (0600/-rw-------)  Uid: ( 1000/  xxxxxx)   Gid: ( 1000/  xxxxxx) Access: 2010-09-30 14:05:16.041621000 -0700 Modify: 2010-09-30 14:05:05.070157000 -0700 Change: 2010-09-30 14:05:05.070475000 -0700   As you can see, it remains unchanged.
Correct usage of suspended hyphens I have seen some people using them while others not. Should I still use a suspended hyphen in the following snippet?     I have used upper- and lowercase in my script. Infinite Series $\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{4^n\cos^2\frac{x}{2^n}}$ How to prove that  $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{4^n\cos^2\frac{x}{2^n}}=\frac1{\sin^2x}-\frac1{x^2}$$ How can I move or force a program installation to another location, even when unsupported? I have an SSD as my main Windows drive, with a 640GB 2.5" HDD, partitioned to store programs and user settings, and also to act as backup (it's the only thing I had lying around at the time of building my PC).  The problem is that whenever I install a program, it installs to C:\Program Files [(x86 for the 32 bit programs]\, although I have changed the environment variables. This wouldn't normally be an issue, however every installation program points its shortcut to my 640GB HDD.  The root layout of both drives:   To clarify:   Program files get installed to C:\ Program shortcuts are always pointed to Z:\, my 640GB HDD   Modifying the relevant environment variables doesn't do anything, I looked at , but however it only talks about modifying the registry and environment variables, which I have already done so.  I install to the Z:\ drive if the installation program lets me change the installation path, but however the installation programs sometimes don't let me change this.  Is there a way that I can force every program to install to the relevant location on Z:\, but at the same time move any programs currently installed to the new location? Perhaps I'm missing something here?  My target is to have every program installed on Z:/, with only the core Windows operating system on C:/.  Found ; would it be appropriate to use in my case? I would be able to move the entire Program Files (and its x86 version) to Z:\, without impacting on the performance.* A book about explorers stranded on a planet with two computers I have been looking for a book that I read in the 80's but it's probably older. It was about a spaceship from Earth in a very long mission to discover life? I don't remember, but they had been far too long in space without any results, so the crew was on the verge of mutiny.  They land on a planet, home of two super-computers called...? Alpha? Beta? One seemed more advanced than the other, the planet was void of any other life, and supposedly it was forseen that the planet would be struck by a comet, and the computers see the ship as a way to save or abandon the planet before the impact.  At some point one member of the crew is captured by the computers, and it's vivisected in an attempt to get data about humans. Then they "reassemble" the crew member before returning it to the ship, hoping that the humans could "reactivate it" since the computers were unable to do so. Which of course enrages the ship's crew.  The ship was unable to take off for reason that I don't remember and they must fight the computers to save themselves.  Does anyone know what this is?  Thanks, as soon as I read the names, they did ring a bell on my memory. The case it's closed then. Prime number expressible as $2^2+3^3+5^5+7^7+11^{11}+\cdots$ Have we completed Diablo 3 in 9 hours? My friend and i decided to play some Diablo 3. We played for almost 9 hours straight and killed Diablo on the hard difficult. We reached level 41.  We think 9 hours is short for a game like Diablo 3.   Have we missed something? Why are we only level 41? Is there more story? When should "farther" and "further" be used? Convert UTC/GMT time to local time Being a fairly new user something I don't seem to be able to locate is information on whether small edits to the title are considered as trivial edits. I see the usual recommendation when suggesting an edit is:     Avoid trivial, tiny one-letter edits unless absolutely necessary.   I can see the logic in that for most cases, but for example I just read a question with a title containing "Andriod" which would be trivial in one way but also affect the ability of users to locate the question using both the site and external search engines. Would it be frowned upon to suggest an edit for those cases? Bevel specific edges Set Windows process (or user) memory limit Is there any way to set a system wide memory limit a process can use in Windows XP? I have a couple of unstable apps which do work ok for most of the time but can hit a bug which results in eating whole memory in a matter of seconds (or at least I suppose that's it). This results in a hard reset as Windows becomes totally unresponsive and I lose my work.  I would like to be able to do something like the /etc/limits on Linux - setting M90, for instance (to set 90% max memory for a single user to allocate). So the system gets the remaining 10% no matter what. How to draw open-close interval in LaTeX I am using the following commands to have half-open interval in a real line:   \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=7] \draw[-&gt;, thick] (-0.1,0) -- (1.7,0); \foreach \x/\xtext in {0/8,0.2/$S_1$,0.4/$T_4$,0.6/$S_3$,0.8/$T_2$,1/$S_3$,1.2/14,1.4/$S_3$,1.6/16}     \draw[thick] (\x,0.5pt) -- (\x,-0.5pt) node[below] {\xtext}; \draw (0.2,0.5pt) node[above] {$c$}; \draw[[-), ultra thick, blue] (0.2,.01) -- (.4,0.01); \draw[(-, ultra thick, green] (0.6,.02) -- (1,0.02); \end{tikzpicture}   Now, I need to have an open-close interval, but I am not able to have that close interval at the end, using the following command:  \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=7] \draw[-&gt;, thick] (-0.1,0) -- (1.7,0); \foreach \x/\xtext in {0/8,0.2/$S_1$,0.4/$T_4$,0.6/$S_3$,0.8/$T_2$,1/$S_3$,1.2/14,1.4/$S_3$,1.6/16}     \draw[thick] (\x,0.5pt) -- (\x,-0.5pt) node[below] {\xtext}; \draw (0.2,0.5pt) node[above] {$c$}; \draw[(-], ultra thick, green] (0.6,.02) -- (1,0.02); \end{tikzpicture}   May I ask for anybody help? How to prove that minimum of two exponential random variables is another exponential random variable? How can I prove that the minimum of two exponential random variables is another exponential random variable, i.e. Z = min(X,Y) How do suggested edits work? When clicking &quot;edit&quot; I see:  Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed. We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.  Like:     Likewise, when I am not logged in, clicking &quot;improve this question&quot; or &quot;improve this answer&quot; shows:  You are not . Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is .  And when I click 'Save', I get:  Thanks for submitting an edit. It is only visible to you until it's been approved by trusted community members  Like:     Who can suggest an edit? Where do suggested edits go? Who can vote on a suggested edit? How do suggested edits get reviewed? Can I earn reputation? What about abuse or bad edits? Sometimes the Community user approves or rejects my edit. Why is that? When can I not suggest an edit? Is there a minimum change requirement for a suggested edit? How do I check my suggested edit history? I disagree with the reasons why my suggested edit was rejected. What can I do? How do I know whether there are edits waiting for review? Someone suggested an edit to my own post, and the reviewers took the wrong action. What can I do? Are tag wikis included in this scheme? What do the &quot;Improve Edit&quot; and &quot;Reject and Edit&quot; buttons do? Why are apparently valid links to rejected edits resulting in 404 errors?   For more information about editing, see &quot;&quot; in the . Highest power of a prime $p$ dividing $N!$ We know that wizards in the Harry Potter universe are subject to regular physical harm (e.g. witness injuries from being hit by Bludgers or just colliding with things when playing Quidditch).  Therefore, it's almost a certainty that an average wizard would be vulnerable to, say, a bunch of bullets.   There may likely be spell(s) to protect from projectiles - witness Dumbledore's  deployed when Voldemort sent a bunch of glass at him during the  at the end of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (according to , possibly an unusually powerful Protego or the Silver shield).   But:   those spells obviously take effort/energy/time to cast (not everyone's Dumbledore) AND more likely than not most Death Eaters wouldn't recognize a Muggle gun for a threat (or realize what kind of threat) till too late.   So, the guns should at best allow an over-matched OotP member (e.g. Harry or Hermione) to greatly equalize the power between any regular Death Eaters and themselves, and even perhaps help against Voldemort (who can't be killed with a bullet, but, at best, would need to expend magical energy and time into conjuring a shield, and, at worst, be stopped/interrupted/driven off).  So I'm looking for an explanation - ideally in-universe, but possibly just some statement by JKR - of why the Muggle-born OotP - who are likely very much at ease AND familiar with Muggle technology and live in the late 20th century - do not use guns. Or, for that matter, ANY Muggle technology of the late 20th century? Cue Arthur C. Clarke's "indistinguishable from magic" meme.  Even if they are on some kind of idiotic moral crusade to never kill their opponents (even the Jedi aren't this dumb), given the time-frame, non-lethal weapons would have already existed, such as rubber bullets and tasers.  NOTE: Please don't offer the "if they do it, Death Eaters would start using guns as well" theory. First, Death Eaters would have used the guns if they knew how to, anyway. Second, the guns, like any "secret weapon", could be reserved for strategic battles, say the defense of Hogwarts in Deathly Hallows.    The origin of the question stems from two things.  First, Harry's fascination with all things that are different in the magical world (e.g. moving photographs), based on his knowledge of the Muggle material world, as well as the somewhat amusing cluelessness of the "Muggle artifacts" expert, Mr. Weasley, regarding Muggle items and how they work.   Basically, from the books, it's clear that the Wizarding world wouldn't know details about guns or what they are for or how they work.  The second thing is it's clear, at least initially, that wizards are afraid of Muggles finding out about them. Hence all the efforts to cloak their society (basically, do you REALLY want every Muggle gunning for you, even with Magic)? The idea of how control over the Muggle world seems to be more indirect, by Death Eaters asserting mind-control over the government. This means there's an implicit understanding by Death Eaters that they don't stand a chance against armed Muggles even given the magical disparity.  Considering Harry and Hermione's overall adaptability and inventiveness (and brains in the latter case), it's mind-boggling that the idea of fighting Death Eaters with modern technology completely slipped their mind. I mean, it's a basic part of human myth (see Steel vs. Magic themes in Conan books, or Beowulf, or heck, A Yankee in King Arthur's Court). So it's not like the idea of using technology against magic would be impossible to come up with. The question begs itself - why not? Considering the fact that Rowling generally tried to be logical and consistent in building the HP universe, I feel like there must be some in-universe explanation for this that I just didn't notice.   (in-universe answers only unless there are some authoritative out-of-universe statements that are part of canon). Downgrading MacBook Pro 16” to Mojave Did anyone succeed in installing Mojave on the MacBook Pro 16”? It ships with Catalina but my corporate requires Mojave to connect to the corporate network.  I  but once I select booting from the Mojave external drive I get a “forbidden” icon and the system shuts down. When conducting a t-test why would one prefer to assume (or test for) equal variances rather than always use a Welch approximation of the df? It seems like when the assumption of homogeneity of variance is met that the results from a Welch adjusted t-test and a standard t-test are approximately the same.  Why not simply always use the Welch adjusted t? Could you help me to point out the differences in the following sentences. for me both sentences imply same meaning.      The Restaurant , offers a broad range of locally caught fresh seafood,   prime steak and meat dishes      The Restaurant , offers a wide range of locally caught fresh seafood,   prime steak and meat dishes As an example, consider the two sentences:     There don't seem to be any doctors here.   and     There doesn't seem to be any doctors here.   To my ear, the first sounds great, and the second is painfully awkward.  So which is correct, grammatically? I've found lots of disagreement on this around the Web, with various sources citing different ways of treating the word "any" (as singular, always, or as either depending on to what it refers). No consensus, however, could I locate.