Interpretation of the Odds-Ratio for percentage value in logistic regression Running a logistic regression, I have a dependent variable   Loyal Customer can be 0 or 1   and an independent variable   Return.rate is a continuous percent value from 0 to 1   If my odds ratio for Return.rate is 5, how do I interpret the result in words?   What is a unit? 1 which is 100%? Or 0.01 which is 1%?
Help me understand adjusted odds ratio in logistic regression I've been having a hard time trying to understand the use of logistic regression in a paper. The paper available  uses logistic regression to predict probability of complications during cataract surgery.   What is confusing me is that the paper presents a model that assigns odds ratio of 1 to baseline described as follows:     A patient whose risk profile was in the reference group for all risk indicators (ie adjusted OR=1.00 for all in Table 1) may be regarded as having a ‘baseline risk profile’, and the logistic regression model indicates a ‘baseline predicted probability’ for PCR or VL or both=0.736%.   So the probability of 0.00736 is presented with odds ratio of 1. Based on the transformation from probabilities to odds ratios: $o=\frac{p}{1-p}$, this can't be equal to 1:  $0.00741=\frac{0.00736}{1-0.00736}$.  It gets even more confusing. The composite odds ratios that represents multiple covariates having values different than the baseline is used to calculate predicted risk.      ...the composite OR from Table 1 would be 1.28 X 1.58 X 2.99 X 2.46 X   1.45 X 1.60 = 34.5, and from the graph in Figure 1, we see that this OR corresponds with a predicted probability of PCR or VL or both of around 20%   The only way to arrive at the values the paper is giving as examples is to multiply the baseline probability with composite odds like this: $0.2025=\frac{(34.50\ \times\ 0.00736)}{1\ +\ (34.50\ \times\ 0.00736)}$.  So what is going on here? What is the logic for assigning odds ratio 1 to a baseline probability that is not 0.5? The update formula I've came up with above comes up with the right probabilities for examples in the paper but this is not the direct multiplication of odds ratio I'd expect. What is it then?
Why doesn't the "zig-zag" comb deformation retract onto a point, even though it's contractible? I am starting to read Hatcher's book on Algebraic Topology, and I am a little stuck with exercise 6(c) in Chapter $0$. Unfortunately a picture is involved so it doesn't quite make sense for me to repeat it here - but I'll do it anyways (maybe it helps)     Let $Z$ be the zigzag subspace of $Y$ homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$ indicated by the heavier line in the picture:       Show there is a deformation retraction in the weak sense of $Y$ onto $Z$, but no true deformation retraction."   Now the definition for deformation retraction and weak deformation retraction as as follows:  We say that $f: X \to X$ is a deformation retraction of a space $X$ onto a subspace $A \subset X$ if there exists a family of maps $f_t : X \to X$ with $t \in [0,1]$ such that $f_0 = \mathbb{1}$ (the identity) and $f_1 (X) = A$ and also $f_t$ restricts to the identity on $A$ for each $t$.   A weak deformation retraction is almost the same, only that we now relax the conditions $f_1(X) = A$ to $f_1 \subset A$ and, for each $t \in [0,1]$ we require that $f_t(A) \subset A$.  Hence, as far as I understand the question and the concepts involved, I need to show that basically no map can be constructed such that the bold zigzag - line stays put while the thin lines retract to the bold line over a finite time interval $0 \leq t \leq 1$. However, I should be able to show that I can pull the thin lines continously onto the thick line, provided I am allowed to move points on the zigzag line .. is that correct ?  Now, the problem is I can't see why I shouldn't be able to do the former, given that I could find a weak deformation retract. Any help would be great! One Time Pad Key Distribution For multiple OTP keys, why not do this:  Key = Hash[(EC)DH Shared Secret + Counter]  The counter will increase per message, and the output of the hash will be random for each new unique input into it. What are the problems or weaknesses with this design??  EDIT: For clarification: both parties will have the shared secret from an ECDH exchange, random numbers from Pythons os.urandom for generating the ECC key how to achieve the journal style shown in the screenshot? Means help me i want to write these all things with perfect setting.. Ubuntu files worthless on Windows? General Information about Eigenvalues for an 3x3 symmetric matrix What's the grammar behind "A'warring", from the lyrics of Symphony of Destruction? What's the grammar behind A'warring, from the lyrics of Symphony of Destruction by Megadeth? It's the first time I'm seeing the use of such apostrophe. Which is higher — "hyper-", "ultra-" or "super-"? Quote unquote (or end-quote), unseparated by the actual quotation Describe the units in $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-d}]$ Book with travellers, alien artefacts and age reversal Looking for the title of a book I read about 5 years ago though I believe the book was a lot older.  Essentially the main male character was on a task and was travelling with a group of people. The mode of transport if I recall was a boat and they were on a remote planet travelling via a river. One of the group was a father to a young female infant. There's a reference to alien artefact/temple that essentially reverse aged a female scientist (the baby) a day at a time and the father is trying to undo it. Also a line I remember is the father used to say see you later alligator and the daughter will reply that awhile crocodile until a day where she forgot.  Another fellow traveller was a pilgrim and his male disciple. There are several other male and female travellers all had different reasons to travel to that location.  The aliens was located within the temple (time locked?) Were invisible to humans. Killed any that entered. Got the impression that they were quadpeds with organic blades/razors that cut people.  I believe the book may be part of a series. The male author though I don't recall the name, has written other works that have received awards. The book or series may have received one too. Which is probably why I decided to read it in the first place.  Question never asked anywhere else. I am from Australia, book was a paper copy bought locally. Upload files upto 2GB from Apex Can a function be made to accept a variable amount of inputs? How do you get git to always pull from a specific branch? Case insensitive regular expression without re.compile? In Python, I can compile a regular expression to be case-insensitive using re.compile:  &gt;&gt;&gt; s = 'TeSt' &gt;&gt;&gt; casesensitive = re.compile('test') &gt;&gt;&gt; ignorecase = re.compile('test', re.IGNORECASE) &gt;&gt;&gt;  &gt;&gt;&gt; print casesensitive.match(s) None &gt;&gt;&gt; print ignorecase.match(s) &lt;_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x02F0B608&gt;   Is there a way to do the same, but without using re.compile. I can't find anything like Perl's i suffix (e.g. m/test/i) in the documentation. I want a true deep copy. In Java, this was easy, but how do you do it in C#? Bash auto_completion with Xubuntu and xrdp from windows I'm using Xubuntu and connecting over RemoteDesktop with Windows 7.  Everything works fine, but the auto_completion in my bash doesn't work. I checked the .bashrc file in my home directory and also the /etc/bash.bashrc.  I uncommend the lines below in my local bashrc configuration and also in bash.bashrc, but nothing changes.  if ! shopt -oq posix; then   if [ -f /usr/share/bash-completion/bash_completion ]; then     . /usr/share/bash-completion/bash_completion   elif [ -f /etc/bash_completion ]; then     . /etc/bash_completion   fi fi I was reading a book and this sentence seemed a little odd to me:     At approximately 19.45 hours the two men rose, stretched and yawned. They picked up their gear and stood at the door, ...   What does the first part mean? If it's the exact time, shouldn't it be 19:45? And if it's duration, shouldn't it be "After 19.45 hours"?  (The story here happens at an airbase, if it's of any relevance)    Edit: The book I've quoted is this:   by John Creed.   The author is Irish and the text is set in northern England/Ireland. How do I get a Ralink RT3290 wireless card working? Why is ${x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$ the same as $\sqrt x $? Why is ${x^{\frac{1}{2}}}$ the same as $\sqrt x $?   I'm currently studying indices/exponents, and this is a law that I was told to accept without much proof or explanation, could someone explain the reasoning behind this.  Thank you. Who is allowed to invite people to a Minecraft Realm?