I have inserted a pdf document using \includepdf. The document has several figures to a page that I want added to a List of Figures. Is there any way to do addtolist={} several times for the same instance of \includepdf? Any other solutions?
These may be separate questions, but the following MWE:    \usepackage{pdfpages} ...   \addcontentsline{lot}{subsection}{\ref{tab:UserRoles} \textbf{User Roles}}   \includepdf[pages={-}, pagecommand={\label{tab:UserRoles}}, offset=0in -1in, addtolist={9, table, {The User Roles table}, tab:UserRoles}]{UserRolesTable}   ...   has several unexpected behaviors.   I get the following warning:  Package pdfpages Warning: There's something wrong with the entries of `addtolist'. Not all entries were processed. Check `addtolist' [in the MWE]."    Probably due to the \label not being bound to the inserted pdf (in a table environment), my inserted PDF is numbered using the section, and not the expected "Table X" value.   The manually-inserted LoT line (which also uses the section number rather than the incremented table number) is not formatted like the other lines in the LoT - the number lines up, but the table caption itself is not aligned with the others in the list.   The source PDF has no errors and displays correctly in the output PDF.  PDFLaTeX -> BibTex    MWE:  \documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,twoside,final]{article} \usepackage{pdfpages} \begin{document} \listoftables \begin{center} \textbf{Table \ref{tab:UserRoles} - The User Roles Table} \addcontentsline{lot}{subsection}{\ref{tab:UserRoles}  \textbf{User Roles}} % manual entry in ToC  \includepdf[pages={-}, pagecommand={\label{tab:UserRoles}}, offset=0in -1in, addtolist={9, table, {The User Roles table}, tab:UserRoles, lot}]{UserRolesTable} \end{center} \end{document}
How do I say what is the current UTC in eastern zone Can someone explained, as detailed as possible, the differences between the following types?  List List&lt;Object&gt; List&lt;?&gt;   Let me make this more specific. When would I want to use  // 1  public void CanYouGiveMeAnAnswer(List l) { }  // 2 public void CanYouGiveMeAnAnswer(List&lt;Object&gt; l) { }  // 3 public void CanYouGiveMeAnAnswer(List&lt;?&gt; l) { } I was having a look at an old question of mine when I browsed the  from the timeline. I scrolled downwards and realized the Review completed panel comes along for the ride. While that might be , tags flowing over top of it as pictured below probably isn't.  Here's a .gif of the Question and Duplicate tabs flowing over it as well. Note that the timeline button also flows over. If vote buttons are present, they will also flow over it.  Reproduced on Chrome and Microsoft Edge. Update Per  by Tiago Martins Peres, this issue also happens in other Review types, namely Late Answers, First Posts and Low Quality Posts. In addition to that, it is causing the action buttons on reviews to become unclickable if you scroll low enough.  As a temporary workaround, you can use 's , which  this issue. How does SQL Server handle logins when the user is a part of multiple groups with various privileges? I'm trying to wrap my head around how SQL Server decides to grant certain rights based on a users login privileges.  If a user is part of a group "READ ONLY" which has access to DB1, but they are also a part of a group "SysAdmin" which has full db owner rights to the same DB1, which rights are they given when they log in?  On a similar note. What if they are part of a group but also have a standalone account with other middle of the road privileges? Replicate data from one list to another list sharepoint Check if this proof about real numbers with an irrational product is correct. Can anyone confirm if my proof is correct, please?  Claim:- “If $x$ and $y$ are real numbers and their product is irrational, then either $x$ or $y$ must be irrational.”  Proof:-   Assume that both $x$ and $y$ are rational. Now, let $x = \dfrac pq$ and $y = \dfrac mn$ since both of them are rational. $xy =\dfrac pq * \dfrac mn = \dfrac{pm}{qn}$ Thus, if the product $xy$ can be written as a fraction, it's not a irrational number. Therefore if one of $x$ and $y$ is not irrational, then the product is not irrational.  By the principle of proof by contraposition, If $x$ and $y$ are real numbers and their product is irrational, then either $x$ or $y$ must be irrational. How to find perpendicular vector to another vector? How do I find a vector perpendicular to a vector like this: $$3\mathbf{i}+4\mathbf{j}-2\mathbf{k}?$$ Could anyone explain this to me, please?  I have a solution to this when I have $3\mathbf{i}+4\mathbf{j}$, but could not solve if I have $3$ components...  When I googled, I saw the direct solution but did not find a process or method to follow. Kindly let me know the way to do it. Thanks. Adjective Used as an Adverb? That cake looks good.    In formal proper grammar, may good (adjective) get used as an adverb? Or, may you read it as, That cake (noun phrase, nominal[?], argument[?]), looks (verb, predicate[?]), good (subject compliment[?].? How may I discern this, grammatically? Do Mandalorians truly never remove their helmets? In episode 3 of The Mandalorian, it is said that Mandalorians never remove their helmets for any reason. Really? Not even to sleep or bathe? Is there any canonical source for this idea? I’m going to assume that the “never” implies “Never removes their helmets in public…” right?  But in flashback scenes to the Mandalorian’s childhood, nobody is really pictured wearing Mandalorian armor let alone helmets. They simply seemed like basic humans who might just be unified by wearing maroon wardrobes all the time.  So what is the deal with this claim? What is the canonical context of the claim?      Looking for in-universe, canonical explanations; not armchair speculation and theories. If none (currently) exist, legends explanation would suffice. Regardless, please provide references and context. Proving $a^2$ is even $\implies$ $a$ is even by contradiction Proving the determinant of a tridiagonal matrix with $-1, 2, -1$ on diagonal. Let $A_n$ denote an $n \times n$ tridiagonal matrix.  $$A_n=\begin{pmatrix}2 &amp; -1 &amp; &amp; &amp; 0 \\ -1 &amp; 2 &amp; -1 &amp; &amp; \\ &amp; \ddots &amp; \ddots &amp; \ddots &amp; \\ &amp; &amp; -1 &amp; 2 &amp; -1 \\ 0 &amp; &amp; &amp; -1 &amp; 2 \end{pmatrix} \quad\text{for }n \ge 2$$  Set $D_n = \det(A_n)$  Prove that $D_n = 2D_{n-1} - D_{n-2}$ for $n \ge 4$. What is the exact reason that normal matter can not exist within an event horizon?  I can understand how a super-dense object like a neutron star could accrete mass until its physical radius is less than its Schwarzschild radius and an event horizon forms around it.   But why can't the neutron star remain inside the event horizon as it was before the event horizon formed? Aside from the escape velocity at the surface reaching $c$, what actually changed?  Why must all matter within an event horizon undergo complete physical collapse to a point? Does a photon exert a gravitational pull? I know a photon has zero rest mass, but it does have plenty of energy. Since energy and mass are equivalent does this mean that a photon (or more practically, a light beam) exerts a gravitational pull on other objects? If so, does it depend on the frequency of the photon? Consider square matrices over a field $K$. I don't think additional assumptions about $K$ like algebraically closed or characteristic $0$ are pertinent, but feel free to make them for comfort. For any such matrix $A$, the set $K[A]$ of polynomials in $A$ is a commutative subalgebra of $M_n(K)$; the question is whether for any pair of commuting matrices $X,Y$ at least one such commutative subalgebra can be found that contains both $X$ and $Y$.  I was asking myself this in connection with frequently recurring requests to completely characterise commuting pairs of matrices, like . While providing a useful characterisation seems impossible, a positive anwer to the current question would at least provide some answer.  Note that in many rather likely situations one can in fact take $A$ to be one of the matrices $X,Y$, for instance when one of the matrices , or more generally if its  (so coincides with the characteristic polynomial). However this is not always possible, as can be easily seen for instance for diagonal matrices $X=\operatorname{diag}(0,0,1)$ and $Y=\operatorname{diag}(0,1,1)$. However in that case both will be polynomials in $A=\operatorname{diag}(x,y,z)$ for any distinct values $x,y,z$ (then $K[A]$ consists of all diagonal matrices); although in the example in  the matrices are not both diagonalisable, an appropriate $A$ can be found there as well.   I thought for some time that any maximal commutative subalgebra of $M_n(K)$ was of the form $K[A]$ (which would imply a positive answer) for some $A$ with minimal polynomial of degree$~n$, and that a positive answer to my question was in fact instrumental in proving this. However I was wrong on both counts: there exist (for $n\geq 4$) commutative subalgebras of dimension${}&gt;n$ (whereas $\dim_KK[A]\leq n$ for all $A\in M_n(K)$) as shown in , and I was forced to correct  in the light of this; however it seems (at least in the cases I looked at) that many (all?) pairs of matrices $X,Y$ in such a subalgebra still admit a matrix $A$ (which in general is not in the subalgebra) such that $X,Y\in K[A]$. This indicates that a positive answer to my question would not contradict the existence of such large commutative subalgebras: it would just mean that to obtain a maximal dimensional subalgebra containing $X,Y$ one should in general avoid throwing in an $A$ with $X,Y\in K[A]$. I do think these large subalgebras easily show that my question but for three commuting matrices has a negative answer.  Finally I note that  to the cited MO question mentions a result by Gerstenhaber that the dimension of the subalgebra generated two commuting matrices in $M_n(K)$ cannot exceed$~n$. This unfortunately does not settle my question (if $X,Y$ would generate a subalgebra of dimension${}&gt;n$, it would have proved a negative answer); it just might be that the mentioned result is true because of the existence of $A$ (I don't have access to a proof right now, but given the formulation it seems unlikely that it was done this way).  OK, I've tried to build up the suspense. Honesty demands that I say that I do know the answer to my question, since a colleague of mine provided a convincing one. I will however not give this answer right away, but post it once there has been some time for gathering answers here; who knows somebody will prove a different answer than the one I have (heaven forbid), or at least give the same answer with a different justification. Will acceleration rate of expansion of space become faster than speed of light? Find index of nested item in python Is spacetime absolute? As I understand it Newton's Laws imply that space is relative, as the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames and as such there is no way, even in principle, to distinguish a frame that is truly at rest (absolute space). Hence the concept is physically meaningless, and the positions of (and distances between) physical objects, events, etc. are relative to the frame in which one is observing them from. Advancing on to Special Relativity, by postulating that the speed of light (in vacuum) is constant in all frames of reference, we are forced to conclude that time is relative also (as if it weren't then different observers would observe a different speed of light (in vacuum)). This leads to the result that the concepts of space and time are no longer completely separate and independent of one another and instead intertwined (as an event that occurs at rest over some time period in one frame, will occur over some spatial interval and a different time interval in another frame). Hence they should be considered as should be considered as a single entity, called spacetime.  Sorry for the waffling so far, just want to check that my understanding is correct up to this point?!  My main question is, given that space and time are (individually) relative quantities, is spacetime itself relative, or can it be considered absolute (as after all, it is the mathematical space of all possible events and exists independently of the physical events that occur within it)? What do parentheses surrounding an object/function/class declaration mean? I'm new to both JavaScript and . In YUI library examples, you can find many uses of this construct:  (function() {     var Dom = YAHOO.util.Dom,     Event = YAHOO.util.Event,     layout = null,         ... })();   I think the last couple of parentheses are to execute the function just after the declaration.  ... But what about the previous set of parentheses surrounding the function declaration?  I think it is a matter of scope; that's to hide inside variables to outside functions and possibly global objects. Is it? More generally, what are the mechanics of those parentheses? Polar form to cartesian Let $\Gamma$ be a circle that passes through the origin. Show that we can find real numbers $s$ and $t$ such that $\Gamma$ is the graph of $r = 2s \cos (\theta + t).$  I know this has to be converted to a cartesian equation, but how do I do this, and what do I do after?  Thanks Where can I find a repository for older unsupported releases?