I've seen scripts I'd like to use, but I'm unfamiliar with making system files like the .blend file visible in OS X and then editing them. So, is there an easy way to install them manually?   Even more ideally, is it easy for anyone else to make an addon for installing scripts? It seems like something that would be a great feature for Blender.
There is this addon that was built called Window Generator 2. It can be . However, when I go to the download link it shows up in a new tab as a bunch of code.  How can I download and use this addon in Blender?
What is the best class or classes in 3.5e to build a character that uses both a sword and either arcane magic or psionics which can be fluffed as arcane magic and focuses on fighting powerful individual creatures?    I have a foundness for those that can sling spell along with blade, like Dak'kon from Planescape: Torment.  So, given that, how do I make the best Gishy character I can?  Specifically, the group is looking for a character focused on delivering high damage or other debilitating effects to an individual target.  There is no need to balance sword and magic, though I would prefer to have the melee abilities remain at least relevant through at least mid-levels.  This question:  is related.  But I am specifically looking to optimize for high targeted damage output and have no need to balance between sword and spell if focusing on one is more effective.  I have considered the duskblade and that may be the best answer, but as I have limited experience with 3.5 I want to find out if I should use a pure duskblade, a duskblade which steps into other classes, or some other class I have not considered.  In this particular case, the characters will start at level 7, and equipment rules are liberal as long as the characters can afford it.  I'm not sure how long this will last so I am focused on the next few levels instead of trying to plan all the way out to 20.  It will be a party of 5.  Not all of the rest of the characters have been fully fleshed out, but we will have a cleric and a wizard.  The other two are more up in the air but they one is looking at various rogue classes and the other is looking at some sort of melee class, with this gishy rounding out the team.  The initial encounter is up in the air, but there is a definite fondness for gryphons.  We do know that we will be working up to dragon in relatively short order, which is a factor in wanting to focus on large damage output to individual creatures as opposed to being able to deal with numerous weaker creatures.  The setting is "modified Forgotten Realms".    I personally own absolutely no 3.5 books, but we have access to a fair bit and just about anything from WoTC is permitted.  I am new to 3.5, but I have a fair bit of roleplaying experience including AD&amp;D.    Thematically, I envision the character as a generally honorable, but working as a monster hunter and mercenary.  I definitely favor swords though specifically which sword is flexible.  Dak'kon from Planescape would be an excellent example of what I would like to build, as would The Witcher.  Based on Kryan's excellent answer, it seems to be leading up to using duskblade and a specialist wizard to lead into Abjurant Champion. SQL Server 2016 memory optimised table: Precreated files constantly growing I have a memory optimised table in SQL Server 2016, with file durability enabled. The table is only 100MB. SQL Server is constantly creating new files on disk, which start off at a few hundred MB, but then grow constantly until the drive runs out of space then they clear down and the process starts again. The files are growing at about 900MB an hour. Running the SQL below shows that all the space is in Precreated Data - so it's not even actually storing large amounts of data, just allocating space to use later.  SELECT state_desc, file_type_desc, COUNT(*) AS [count],    SUM(file_size_in_bytes) / 1024 / 1024 AS [on-disk size MB]    FROM sys.dm_db_xtp_checkpoint_files   GROUP BY state, state_desc, file_type, file_type_desc   ORDER BY state, file_type     File growth on the file group is set to unlimited, so I'm assuming I can set a value on this and stop it growing, but I can't find anything to say why it's allocating so much space in the first place. The data in the table does change very rapidly (a lot of inserts and deletes as the data is constantly processed, but it the data that isn't Precreated never gets over 4GB.  Is there a setting in SQL Server that controls this file precreation? Is it safe to set a limit on the autogrowth for the file group? $S=\{(n,{1\over n}):n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is closed in $X$? The topological space $X=\mathbb{N}\times \mathbb{Q}$ with subspace topology of $\mathbb{R}^2$ the set $S=\{(n,{1\over n}):n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is closed in $X$?  $S^c=\phi\times\{{1\over n}\}^c$ right? but I know $\mathbb{Q}$ is neither open nor closed in $\mathbb{R}$, I am confused here, could any one help me to answer this question?  the boundary of $S$ is $\bar{S}\setminus $ int S. as int S is $\phi$ so boundary is $\mathbb{N}\times \mathbb{R}$? Is there a "smallest" divergent sum? Resource for Blender addons? What is the recommended way to encrypt user passwords in a database? I remember after Stargate: Universe was cancelled, that I read, somewhere on the web, either part of an interview or an article by one of the producers about what they were planning if there had been a third season.  (He said they weren't sure whether they'd set it soon after the ending of the second season, or later, or were going to do something else.)  He also wrote that, while he felt okay discussing that, he did not feel like he could reveal how the story about the superstructure the Destiny had found would turn out.  He said that was something the other two producers had worked out and he didn't want to reveal it and would leave it up to them to reveal it if they wanted to.  Was this ever revealed?  Did the other producers ever discuss or reveal anything about what was going to happen with that storyline?    Addition: I'm referring to the superstructure that is the message found in the background radiation throughout the universe, not anything from the planet builders or other easily seen physical structures. Is it possible to annotate equations (i.e. arrow signs/curly braces) to define each variable? I have quite a simple question. I was wondering if it was possible to do something like this in LaTeX:    But formatted a little more nicely.  It doesn't need to be arrows necessarily. Just some form of annotation marker. If I have several classes with functions that I need but want to store separately for organisation, can I extend a class to have both?  i.e. class a extends b extends c  edit: I know how to extend classes one at a time, but I'm looking for a method to instantly extend a class using multiple base classes - AFAIK you can't do this in PHP but there should be ways around it without resorting to class c extends b, class b extends a I am trying to do SVD by hand:  m&lt;-matrix(c(1,0,1,2,1,1,1,0,0),byrow=TRUE,nrow=3)  U=eigen(m%*%t(m))$vector V=eigen(t(m)%*%m)$vector D=sqrt(diag(eigen(m%*%t(m))$values))  U1=svd(m)$u V1=svd(m)$v D1=diag(svd(m)$d)  U1%*%D1%*%t(V1) U%*%D%*%t(V)   But the last line does not return m back. Why? It seems to has something to do with signs of these eigenvectors... Or did I misunderstand the procedure? I've a friend that booked a round-trip journey. He booked A-to-B and B-to-A. Somehow he needed to be earlier at location B, so he took a train and did not take the flight from A to B.  When he went to the airport to take the "back home" flight (B-to-A), he was informed that his ticket was canceled because he did not take the A-to-B flight. They canceled the ticket and sold it to someone else.  Is this normal? The company said it was their right to do so, and he could not get the flight back. The company was Iberia. Using "the" instead of "a" for something that isn't a specific object I've been curious about this for a while.  Generally, one uses "the" if they mean a specific object ("The copy of Lord of the Rings I bought yesterday") instead of any object that fits a description ("I have a copy of Lord of the Rings").  However I've seen "the" used in some cases where the phrase doesn't refer to a specific object. I've noticed it mostly being about technology, such as "This game requires the Classic Controller" (seen on some Wii Virtual Console games). While saying "This game requires a Classic Controller" seems to be correct as well, using "the" doesn't feel wrong either.  The controller's page on Wikipedia also uses "the":   What is the rule that allows the use of "the" in this context?  I presume it has something to do with "Classic Controller" being a proper noun. I'm a beginner at photography and own a Canon 20D with two lens; a 50mm prime and a 17mm-85mm zoom.  I've purchases all my filters at 67mm to fit my zoom lens and use a  to use them with my prime lens.  I'm looking at buying a . My question is, will the same principal work? Can I buy a 67mm wide angle lens and use it on my 52mm prime without any trouble.  One of the reasons for the purchase of a wide angle is my cropped sensor makes the 50mm prime rather close - I'm hoping the wide angle will make it easier to capture more.  Many thanks for any help in advance. Pete Google Voice Recognition on iOS How can I change pdf page size? I would like to split pages in pdf so that each page would be divided into 2 pages ( e.g. form 100 pages I would go into 200 but smaller - exactly half size).  I need this to read pdfs on my ebook reader.  Anybody knows how can this be done ? When should "no problem" replace "you're welcome" as a response to "thank you"? MySQL is giving weird result It is asked to solve the PDE  $$u_x + u_y + u = e^{x+2y}$$  My attempt: We have that $$\frac{dx}{1}=\frac{dy}{1}=\frac{du}{e^{x+2y}-u} $$  $\Rightarrow \frac{dy}{dx}=1 \Rightarrow y=x+C_1 \iff C_1=y-x$  $\Rightarrow \frac{du}{dx}= e^{x+2y}-u \iff \dot{u}+u=e^{x+2y} \iff \\ \frac{d}{dx}(e^x u) = e^{2x+2y} \iff u = e^{-x} ( \frac{1}{2}e^{2x+2y} + C_2)$  As $u$ is constant along its characteristics:  $$u(x,y)=\frac{e^{-x}}{2}(e^{2x+2y} + 2C_2(y-x))$$  where $C_2$ is any function of one variable. But wolfram gave the following answer  $$u(x,y)=\frac{e^{-x}}{4}(e^{2x+2y} + 4C_2(y-x))$$  as you can check   What am I doing wrong? What's the possibility of adding a "Did you mean ..." in the tagging system? I am really satisfied that $(x \to a) ≠(x=a)$ and if that is not right , Then all the process of $Limits$ is dividing by zero and that is a crime.  Since $(x \to a) + h = (x=a)$ , $h ≠ 0$,So Why does $f(x \to a) = f(x = a)$ ?  NOTE:I am talking about continuous function.