I was helping my mother troubleshoot a problem with her Gmail and now every time I go to use Gmail, her account comes up as the default one. I don't know her password, but I can't sign out of her account without signing in first, so I can't remove it from the list.  This is really annoying.  Is there any way I can remove this entry without having to log in to her account?  All other solutions I have seen to this issue involve somehow signing out of the account before being able to remove it. I cannot do that because when I go to click on the account to switch to it, I am asked to verify that it's me (which it isn't) and type a password (which I don't know.)
When signing in with Google (OAuth), it shows a list of accounts it already knows about. How can I remove some accounts from this list?    I know I can nuke all of them by deleting all cookies, but I'd prefer to remove one account that I don't want there, rather than all of them.  There used to be an ability to edit this list in the older version of this screen, but in 2018 redesign Google has removed [×] buttons next to the accounts.
What items are mutually exclusive between worlds? As of 1.2, some features are mutually exclusive between worlds.  In the case of ores at least, .  However, a  gives you the chance for a  (and the upgraded Sweetheart Necklace) which does not seem to have an equivalent version in the Corruption.    What items, if any, are truly mutually exclusive in function between worlds? Make Bash autocomplete guess the closest approximation I have a somewhat uncomfortable keyboard on my laptop, resulting in that I sometimes misspell things in Bash and when pressing Tab for an auto-completion nothing happens.   Is it possible to have Bash guess what I meant to type, by for example when wanting to change directory to Documents and then mistyping cd ocum[TAB], given no other folder beginning with "ocum" is present, Bash interprets it as cd Documents/ since it is the closest possible action to do?   Or is this idea terribly complicated to achieve? vim-clang-format: clang-format is not found I have this HW where I have to calculate the $74$th derivative of $f(x)=\ln(1+x)\arctan(x)$ at $x=0$. And it made me think, maybe I can say (about $\arctan(x)$ at $x=0$) that there is no limit for the second derivative, therefore, there are no derivatives of degree grater then $2$. Am I right? In java SSL over https without certificate I encountered a problem today to prove that $(X_n)$ with $X_n = \cos(n!)$ does not have a limit (when $n$ approaches infinity). I have no idea how to do it formally. Could someone help? The simpler the proof (by that I mean less complex theorems are used) the better. Thanks On Knoppix-based distros, you get a nice Tux logo on the left of the screen during text boot. Is this possible to get on Ubuntu? How do you find the value of $\sum_{r=0}^{44} \tan^2(2r+1)$? Problem:   Find the value of $$\sum_{r=0}^{44} \tan^2(2r+1)$$  Note: The angles here are in degrees.    I don't know how to solve this question because trigonometric simplifications didn't get me anywhere. I think there was a method to solve this question using complex numbers which I no longer remember. Any hint/help will be appreciated. Resistors in series vs parallel I have always argued adamantly, as long as the issue has been around, that gift should never be used as a verb. However, someone whose English knowledge I quite respect disagrees.  I’ve done some searching and I haven’t found a consensus; should gifting be shunned? The verb let means  “allow”, “permit”, “not prevent or forbid”, “pass, go or come”  and it's used with an object and the bare infinitive.         Are you going to let me drive or not?     Don't let him off the hook.     Before we let our children surf the Internet, they have to do their homework.     She lets the cats out before leaving.   He let us into the house.      The full form let us can be used similarly        Let us know as soon as possible.      Please, let us help you.   They will never let us forget.      None of the above can be contracted; however, when let us is used for making a suggestion; giving self-encouragement; expressing a consequence or plea,  it is often contracted to let's      Let's go out   Let's have a party   Let's see what happens   Let's stand together in this emergency   Let's not forget those who sacrificed their lives     Questions   I believe that let + us is the only instance where this type of contraction occurs. Is there an explanation as to why verbs such as (i) give + us, (ii) get + us or (iii) take + us were not similarly contracted? When was the apostrophe used to replace the omitted letter "u" in let us?  What is the origin of let's? sed substitution with Bash variables I'm writing my thesis using MiKTeX and WinEdt 9 for Windows. I write the different chapters individually, and then I have a "masterfille" with the documentclass "report" where I use the command "input" to load the individual chapters. In other words there is only a preamble in the "masterfile".  I have a very general problem which is the following: No matter what kind of mistake I do whatsoever, I will first receive the correct error message, say I forgot to end a table or something (it really does not matter). If I correct this mistake and try to recompile without using the option "Erase Output Files" in Winedt, I will always and very quickly receive a new error message, often containing a mysterious "Undefined control sequence". Having to do this every time and to recompile plus run the Biber (L+B+L+L+D) is very time consuming, since the document is very large. Any ideas what the problem could be? Here is the preamble of my "masterfile" (I am probably including irrelevant information, sorry for that):   \documentclass[12]{report} \setcounter{tocdepth}{2} \usepackage{layout} \setlength{\voffset}{-0.75in} \setlength{\headsep}{5pt} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{csquotes} \usepackage{authblk} \usepackage [T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[backend=biber, style=authoryear-comp]{biblatex} \usepackage{xyling} \usepackage[super]{nth} \usepackage{xspace} \usepackage{cgloss4e} \usepackage{abstract} \usepackage{array} \usepackage{multirow} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{xr} \usepackage{gb4e} \noautomath  \let\eachwordone\itshape   \makeatletter \pretocmd{\@footnotetext}{     \@noftnotefalse\setcounter{fnx}{0}%     \renewcommand{\thexnumi}{\roman{xnumi}}     }{}{} \apptocmd{\@footnotetext}{     \@noftnotetrue     \renewcommand{\thexnumi}{\arabic{xnumi}}     }{}{} \@ifpackageloaded{bidi}{% \pretocmd{\@LTRfootnotetext}{     \@noftnotefalse\setcounter{fnx}{0}%     \renewcommand{\thexnumi}{\roman{xnumi}}     }{}{} \apptocmd{\@LTRfootnotetext}{     \@noftnotetrue     \renewcommand{\thexnumi}{\arabic{xnumi}}     }{}{} } \makeatother     \addbibresource{ref.bib}    \title{The origins of Old Romance V2: A comparative study of Late Latin, Old French and Middle High German} \author{XXX} \date{\today}   \begin{document}  \tableofcontents   \chapter{Old French} \input{chapters/OldFrench2}  \printbibliography  \end{document} Quantum Field Theory from a mathematical point of view I'm a student of mathematics with not much background in physics. I'm interested in learning Quantum field theory from a mathematical point of view.  Are there any good books or other reference material which can help in learning about quantum field theory? What areas of mathematics should I be familiar with before reading about Quantum field theory? I've got this one file, favicon.ico. It's actually a large group of nested files, but purely for example, just this one.  If I do cp favicon.ico favicon2.ico, Apache can read the second one just fine.  If I do mv favicon.ico favicon3.ico, Apache throws a 403 on favicon3.ico.  If I su apache, I can read the file as apache.  stat says both files are identical, except for the inode number.  Is there some hidden flag somewhere or something that I'm missing? I've never seen anything like this.  error_log says (13)Permission denied: access to /favicon3.ico denied How to create a list template by using CSOM? How might I describe washed up stuff in a word or phrase?  Asking for my granddaughter. She knows about "jetsam" but that's for things deliberately jettisoned:     unwanted material or goods that have been thrown overboard from a ship   and washed ashore, especially material that has been discarded to   lighten the vessel -    so does not fit in her story.  Neither does "flotsam", which is wreckage, though not deliberately discarded. And the "flot" says it's floating, not washed up.     the part of the wreckage of a ship and its cargo found floating on the   water. - Taylor Series type inequality "Repository doesn't support architecture" when trying to update on Landscape client Combinatorial Proof Question: Vandermonde convolution identity