I have an answer on SO like this  1. step  Some text  2. step   Problem it looks like this        step         Some text         step      Why is it making 2 appear as 1?  Link   What am I doning wrong here?
Oftentimes, I want to include code samples in a list, for example:   Item One Item Two, for example: private bool ItemTwo() {     return this.IFeelLucky; } Item Three   The problem is that there isn't a good and intuitive way to do this using . It's doable, but you have to do some formatting black-magic to get it that way, which is just not "nice" to deal with.  Source that produces this:  1. Item One 2. Item Two, for example: &lt;br/>&lt;br/>&lt;pre>&lt;code>private bool ItemTwo()     {         return this.IFeelLucky;     }&lt;/code>&lt;/pre> 3. Item Three    I would love to just be able to do it this way:  1. Item One 2. Item Two, for example:      private bool Test()     {         return this.IFeelLucky;     }  3. Item Three  Which results in, well, this:   Item One Item Two, for example:  private bool Test() {     return this.IFeelLucky; } Item Three
Add new JDBC Driver to connect Mathematica to SQL database When viewing a question, when I hover over the star icon (under the voting module) the tooltip says I've made it a favorite when I haven't yet. X and Y are not correlated, but X is significant predictor of Y in multiple regression. What does it mean? X and Y are not correlated (-.01); however, when I place X in a multiple regression predicting Y, alongside three (A, B, C) other (related) variables, X and two other variables (A, B) are significant predictors of Y. Note that the two other (A, B) variables are significantly correlated with Y outside of the regression.   How should I interpret these findings? X predicts unique variance in Y, but since these are not correlated (Pearson), it is somehow difficult to interpret.  I know of opposite cases (i.e., two variables are correlated but regression is not significant) and those are relatively simpler to understand from a theoretical and statistical perspective. Note that some of the predictors are quite correlated (e.g., .70) but not to the extent that I would expect substantial multicollinearity. Maybe I am mistaken, though.    NOTE: I asked this question previously and it was closed. The rational was that this question is redundant with the question "". Perhaps I do not understand the other question, but I believe these are entirely separate questions, both mathematically and theoretically. My question is entirely independent from if "a regression is significant". Furthermore, several predictors are significant, while the other question entails variables not being significant, so I don't see the overlap. If these questions are redundant for reasons I do not understand, please insert a comment prior to closing this question. Also, I was hoping to message the moderator who closed the other question to avoid identical questions, but I couldn't find an option to do so. This is a  about File Permission and Why 777 is "destructive".   I'm not asking how to fix this problem, as there are a ton of references of that already on Server Fault (reinstall OS). Why does it do anything destructive at all?  If you've ever ran this command you pretty much immediately destroy your operating system. I'm not clear why removing restrictions has any impact on existing processes. For example, if I don't have read access to something and after a quick mistype in the terminal suddenly I now have access well... why does that cause Linux to break? Short description of the scoping rules? How can I tell hotels exist that aren't on the booking web sites? There are a ton of sites out there to help book hotel rooms and to aggregate all the different sites to book hotel rooms. These companies make enough money to buy ads on TV, so I won't name them here. I normally poke around 3 or 4 of these as part of planning any trip.  I am now starting some very long term planning for a 6 week South Pacific trip, which includes undertstanding what hotels costs on some very small islands. I have paper guidebooks and I've been looking online. But I come across anomalies. For example, a place which has only 9 hotels listed on the sites I use, and prices range from $1000/night down to $200/night, then when I read the reviews on that cheapest one people are saying "it's nothing special, there are 5 or 6 places just like it here for half the price". Well, not on this site there aren't!  My guess is that many of these places don't have web sites, or don't have online booking, and therefore aren't getting into the aggregators. For some islands I have found local tourism boards with lists of "pensions" and such, typically cheaper than what I can find on the aggregators.    But how can I know? I don't want to assume that popular web sites represent reality, and choose only from places listed there. But I don't want to invest 10-20 hours of research per island only to discover the aggregators had everything. How can I know where the coverage is good and where it isn't, what kinds of hotels are more or less likely to be listed at expedia, trivago, booking, hotels, tripadvisor, and the like? (For example, I don't want to stay at a hostel, so I don't mind if they're not included in online sites.) Are there sites like wikitravel that list places without much of an internet presence?  I'm starting my research over a year before the trip, but wading through hotel pages is not the fun part of the planning so tell me how the smart people do it. How do you correctly use a meat thermometer? Showing a compact metric space has a countable dense subset Is a diode needed for this simple mini solenoid circuit? I was just thinking about this recently, and I thought of a possible bijection between the natural numbers and the real numbers.  First, take the numbers between zero and one, exclusive.  The following sequence of real numbers is suggested so that we have bijection.    0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 0.01, 0.02, ... , 0.09, 0.10, 0.11, ... , 0.99, 0.001, 0.002, ... , 0.999, 0.0001, etc.  Obviously, this includes repeats, but this set is countable.  Therefore, the set of all numbers between zero and one is a subset of the above countable set, and is thus countable.  Then we simply extend this to all real numbers and all the whole numbers themselves, and since the real numbers, as demonstrated above, between any two whole numbers is countable, the real numbers are the union of countably many countable sets, and thus the real numbers are countable.    Please help me with this.  I understand the diagonalization argument by Cantor, but I am curious specifically about this proof which I thought of and its strengths and flaws.  Thanks. Improve the editing flow with predefined options for "Edit Summary" How to re-enable tray icons for applications in Ubuntu? I'm experiencing a strange problem with Outlook 2019. When viewing a message it only shows the first line. On an HTML message, it stops at the first close paragraph tag. On a plaintext message, it stops at the first newline character. This is true if viewing a message in the reading pane as well as if double-clicking the message to open in its own window. I have the preview pane set to show 3 lines and it does show more of the message so it seems like Outlook can see more of the message than it's rendering in the reading pane. If I use View Source, the underlying data seems fine and the whole message is there. I've tried the following:  Deleting and re-creating the user's mail profile Uninstalling &amp; re-installing Office Creating a new Windows account &amp; connecting Outlook to a different Exchange account than the one that originally exhibited the problem Checked for Windows updates Checked for Office updates  Any ideas what might be causing this? I feel like I've tried everything obvious &amp; I'm striking out on Google. Punctuations with relative pronouns Sogou is a Chinese search engine, which can search text, images, music and maps.  Is a comma required before "which" in the above sentence? A weighted version of random.choice If $\left|z+\frac{2}{z}\right |=2$, then prove that max value of $|z|$ is $\sqrt 3 + 1$ (Corrected version) Then the expression will be  $$|z|+\frac{2}{|z|}\ge 2$$  Solving the quadratic inequality   $$|z|\ge1+i$$ and $$|z|\le1-i$$  I don’t know how to solve further. Please help  Thanks!   this is the corrected version of an identical question asked by me. I am sorry for the inconvenience caused ''More than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression'' postgres error I am trying to realize a postgres request :   select distinct nom_reg_12  from region_15,repartition  where st_intersects(region_15.geom,                    (select geom                     from repartition                     where id_espece='Tetrarti'))=true;    but i get the following error :      More than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression   in the first time I tried this and it work fine :   select distinct nom_reg_12  from region_15,repartition  where st_intersects(region_15.geom,repartition.geom)=true;   and then I tried this a part to get the geometry I want :   select geom from repartition where id_espece='Tetrarti' What are the rules for splitting words at the end of a line? What are the rules in English language to split words at the end of a line?   Where exactly must the hyphen split the word? If $(X,d)$ is a complete metric space and $A$ is closed then show that for $x \in X$ there exists an element $a_0 \in A$ such that $d(x,A)=d(x,a_0)$ How can I install more recent versions of software than what Debian provides? Suppose I want a more recent version of software than is available for my current version of an operating system, what can I do?  Cases to consider:   There are semiofficial/official sources of additional packages available for that version of the OS. E.g. backports.org for Debian or PPAs for Ubuntu. There are no more recent versions of the package available for that version of the OS, but there are more recent versions available for more recent versions of the OS. This is the standard case for backporting. There are no packaged versions of more recent versions of the software available. Options available are to package the more recent version.     Per  this is intended as a place to put canonical answers for the following. Answers should probably be made community wiki.