I started using Xubuntu a few weeks ago, and I'm annoyed with a strange behaviour : when I accidentally type a certain keyboard shortcut (yet to be determined), my screen shifts to a "magnified" mode (it gets a 10% zoom and starts to move the opposite way of my mouse pointer).  I'd like to know the shortcut (so I can at least leave this mode without disconnecting my session everytime...) and if possible, how to disable this completely. I found nothing related in the Keyboard manager.
In XFCE4 desktop environments, alt+scroll wheel zooms my entire desktop. I'm finding this very annoying because sometimes I flick the scroll wheel to go to the top of a document then press the alt key for a some unrelated keyboard shortcut and find myself zoomed in so far I can't see anything at all. Is there any way to disable this feature?
individual tick label style with pgfplots given the following code, I want to modify the tick labels in such a way, that for negative values of x, the labels are located above the x-axis. How can I realize this?  \documentclass{report} \usepackage{pgf} \usepackage{pgfplots} \pgfplotsset{compat=newest} \pgfplotsset{plot coordinates/math parser=false} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[% axis x line=middle, axis y line=middle, width=10cm, height=10cm, scale only axis, xmin=-5, xmax=5, xtick={-4, -2, 0,  2,  4}, xticklabels={$-4\pi$, $-2\pi$, $0$, $2\pi$, $4\pi$}, extra x ticks={-4, -2}, ymin=-1.4, ymax=1.4, ytick={-1,  0,  1}] \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture}% \end{document} Does $k+\aleph_0=\mathfrak{c}$ imply $k=\mathfrak{c}$ without the Axiom of Choice? I'm currently reading a little deeper into the Axiom of Choice, and I'm pleasantly surprised to find it makes the arithmetic of infinite cardinals seem easy. With AC follows the Absorption Law of Cardinal Arithmetic, which states that for $\kappa$ and $\lambda$ cardinal numbers, the larger infinite and the smaller nonzero, then $\kappa+\lambda=\kappa\cdot\lambda=\max(\kappa,\lambda)$.  I was playing around with the equation $k+\aleph_0=\mathfrak{c}$ for some cardinal $k$. From the above, it follows that $\mathfrak{c}=k+\aleph_0=\max(k,\aleph_0)$, which implies $k=\mathfrak{c}$.  I'm curious, can we still show $k=\mathfrak{c}$ without the Axiom of Choice? Is it maybe possible to bound $\mathfrak{c}-\aleph_0$ above and below by $\mathfrak{c}$? But then I'm not quite sure such algebraic manipulations even mean anything, or work like that here. Certainly normal arithmetic does not! Thanks. How can I get distribution name and version number in a simple shell script? Trying to install Atom. Unable to start Clangd language server Gray cone obscuring/clipping the 3D Viewport How to convert SSH public key from PEM to DER format? Trigger an event with Prototype Does anybody know of a method to trigger an event in Prototype, as you can with jQuery's trigger function?  I have bound an event listener using the observe method, but I would also like to be able to fire the event programatically.  Thanks in advance What is the domain of $x^x$ as a real valued function? Consider the function $f(x) = x^x$.  Wolfram alpha tells me that this function's domain is $x : x&gt;0$, $x \in \mathbb{R}$. I can't see why it cannot be defined for a number like $(-2)$. I mean $(-2)^{-2}=0.25$, the same Wolfram Alpha told me. I realize that fractional powers for negative numbers may cause problems, but it could be defined for integers. Thanks for any help. At least two questions (, ) on this site indicate that in more than a few isolated cases at least, letters of recommendation are in fact written by the applicant and only signed off (or perhaps rephrased somewhat) by the recommender, who would actually be responsible for writing the letter.  Is there any evidence about the prevalence of this practice that goes beyond anecdotes? I realize that cross-country (cultural) difference may play a role. How do I use itertools.groupby()? I haven't been able to find an understandable explanation of how to actually use Python's itertools.groupby() function.  What I'm trying to do is this:  Take a list - in this case, the children of an objectified lxml element Divide it into groups based on some criteria Then later iterate over each of these groups separately.  I've reviewed , but I've had trouble trying to apply them beyond a simple list of numbers. So, how do I use of itertools.groupby()?  Is there another technique I should be using?  Pointers to good &quot;prerequisite&quot; reading would also be appreciated. How do I show that $\ln(x) = \lim_{n\to\infty} n (x^{1/n} - 1)$?  I ran into this identity on . I haven't been able to find any proof online and my efforts to get from $\ln(x) := \int_1^x \frac{\mathrm dt}t$ to that limit have been a failure. Do an action and its Euler-Lagrange equations have the same symmetries? Assume a certain action $S$ with certain symmetries, from which according to the Lagrangian formalism, the equations of motion (EOM) of the system are the corresponding Euler-Lagrange equations.  Can it happen that the equations of motion derived by this procedure have different kinds and/or numbers of symmetries than the action one has started with? And if yes, are there underlying principles that state why which kind of symmetries the action does not have can emerge in corresponding EOMs or which kind of symmetries of the action can potentially disappear in the EOMs derived from the Euler-Lagrange equations? What's the difference between &lt;div class=""&gt; and &lt;div id=""&gt; when it comes to CSS? Is it alright to use &lt;div id=""&gt;?  I see different developers doing this in both ways, and since I'm self taught, I've never really figured it out. Check which IPs or web-sites an app is communicating with? Usually they do it behind the scenes. So I'd love to know where apps are actually sending data and from whom they are actually getting responses. If $\lim_{x \to +\infty} f'(x) = L$, then $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac {f(x)}{x} = L$ I'm trying to solve this question:     Let $f:[0,+\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ be derivable and $\lim_{x \to +\infty} f'(x) = L$, then $\lim_{x\to \infty}\frac {f(x)}{x}=L$.   I'm trying to solve this question using l'Hôpital rule, but I couldn't use it, because I don't know if $\lim_{x\to +\infty} f(x)=+\infty$.  I need help.  Thanks a lot. Fix SD card that cannot be formatted Can I get UAC prompt for user from batch file? Can I get UAC prompt for user from batch file?  For example I need put some keys to registry under CurrentControlSet from batch file by     reg import path\to\my.reg   PS. runas is not a solution as my customers uses different Windows localisation and I can not guess which name used for Administrator account (this can be Администратор)...  And script don't know administrator password.  And UAC dialog box does not require password entering... Android App sometimes loses answer drafts Sharing a Bluetooth Keyboard and Mouse sequentially between two Macs Is your MAC address revealed when you hit up a website? When you hit up a site, such as cnn.com, does the TCP/IP packet contain the MAC address of your network card?  Could cnn.com theoretically record my MAC address?