I would like to install Office 2015/365 on Ubuntu 15.04. I tried to install Office using Wine, but that did not work. Please note that I do not want virtualisation unless it has a -like behaviour, where application windows are treated like regular Ubuntu application windows by the system.
I am trying to install Microsoft Office 2013 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (32-bit). I have downloaded an iso file of said product and installed wine1.4-i386 using the apt-get command on the terminal.  The question is I don't know the steps how to install it. I can't get much tutorials on Internet how MSOffice2013 can be installed on Ubuntu.  If any versions of wine isn't an option, what other options can be used to run Microsoft Office 2013?
There are two directories shown by 'ls'.  Normally directories anywhere are blue on black background.  But the first one is blue on green and impossible to read.  Why is this?  How to make it blue on black, or at least something light on something dark?  This is on Ubuntu 12.04, using bash in Gnome Terminal.  In Konsole, the blue is slightly darker, and possible to read, though could be way better. I am stuck in a question for Algebraic Structures:  I need to prove: If given any ring $R$, for any $a$ in $R$ $a\cdot a=0$ then $a+a=0$.  (of course $+$, $*$ and $0$ regarding $R$)  I didn't find any question regarding this question. Quantum entanglement faster than speed of light? How can I install Sun/Oracle's proprietary Java JDK 6/7/8 or JRE? I want to install Oracle's JRE and to update to the latest version with the Software Updater when they released. Is there a Ubuntu package that is provided by Canonical or Oracle?  Before release Java 7, I followed  to install Java 6.  But it doesn't work for Java 7. There is no package sun-java7-xxx. How can you install Java 7? The question is:      Prove that if $p \in \mathbb{Z}$ is irreducible, then $p$ is also prime.    Irreducible is defined as follows: $n \in \mathbb{Z} $ is irreducible iff the only way to write $n=ab$ for some integers $a$ and $b$ is if $a = \pm1$ or $b = \pm1$. Prime is defined as follows: an integer $n$ is prime iff whenever $a,b \in \mathbb{Z} $ and $p\mid ab$ then it must be true that $p\mid a$ or $p\mid b$ (or both).    Hint: Prove that if $n\mid ab$ but $n$ does not divide $a$, then $\gcd(a,n) = \pm1$. Then use Bézout's theorem and prove $n\mid b$. What's the difference between mobile and desktop processors? I just read about the new Samsung Galaxy Note Edge having a 2.7&nbsp;GHz quad-core processor and 3GB of RAM.  The laptop I bought last year by HP is 4&nbsp;GB of RAM and 2.3&nbsp;GHz quad-core and my iMac is even older and is 2.5&nbsp;GHz i5.  Does this mean that the new Samsung gadget is more powerful than my desktop?  Is the 2.7&nbsp;GHz the same kind of GHz as non-mobile devices (is it scaled up, or compared, etc.)?  Why, in terms of power, do modern computers not have two of those Samsung quad-core processors running in parallel pushing out 5.4&nbsp;GHz processing power for the amount of electrical energy as two Galaxy Note batteries? It seems that there are many ways to prove the Sylow theorems. I'd like to see a collection of them. Please write down or share links to any you know. TikZ: What EXACTLY does the the |- notation for arrows do? I am currently trying to work out how the perpendicular arrows  work, and I fail.  Taking:  \draw [arrow] (node1) -- node[sloped, above] {Caption} (node1 |- node2.north west);   I suspected that the notation meant: Draw an arrow from node 1, to the north-west corner of  node 2. Make the arrow perpendicular to node 1.  Further attempts to draw arrows told me: No, that's not it. I have sadly failed to figure out what exactly the notation is supposed to be doing though! Is there any "explanation for dummies" that will lead me to understand what exactly    node1 |-   Is supposed to do?  Thanks! How  can I delete a node after, for example, 2 weeks it has been created? Python re.sub with a flag does not replace all occurrences I have a file containing lists on Solaris:  List A hi hello hw r u  List B Hi Yes  List C Hello   I need to transpose the lists as shown below:  List A    List B    List C hi        Hi        Hello hello     Yes hw r u   How can I do this on Solaris? In Episode 1: The Phantom Menace, Anakin's mother, Shmi, said that he does not have a father, although it seemed to me that she doubted that.  Is there a canonical answer as to who Anakin's father is?  If so, who? Example to prove that $ C^1[0,1] $ is not a Banach space for the uniform norm? The space $ C^1[0,1] $- the space of all continuously differentiable functions on $ [0,1]$ is not a Banach space with respect to the sup norm,$ \|.\|_{\infty} $ since the uniform limit of a continuously differentiable function need not be differentiable.  How can I illustate this statement using a counter example? Can I use $ f_{n}=\frac1 n \sin nx $ as a counter example?  Also, is $ C^1[0,1] $ is same as the space given by $ X=\{f\in C^1[0,1]:f(0)=0 \}$. Can I use the same example to show that this is not a Banach space?  More help is appreciated! Thanks! How can I fit my table of contents into a single page? When I use \tableofcontents I get all my contents in a single page except for a line that goes on the other page, how can I make all in the same page? Review counts in top-bar and /review don't match How to perform a full system dump/backup with a broken screen? So, yesterday my phone took a serious tumble.  It is now essentially useless, as the screen either fails to turn on, or when it does, there is nothing useful to see (just lines of primary colors, mostly).  I believe (from the fact that it still chirps at me when emails come in, etc), that the phone is still functional, otherwise.  I would like to perform a full system dump, so that I can get off any files from the phone (a TMobile SGS2 (hercules) running slimrom 4.3 build 1).  The sdcard probably isn't important, as I can just pull it, but the phone's own internal storage I should like to get a copy of.  When I plug the phone into a usb port, it 'mounts' the usb via MTP, and I can see all the files.  Unfortunately, when I do a select all | copy | paste operation, the paste op dies before transferring all files.  I've tried a couple other ADB shell operations, in hope of flipping regular USB mounting on, but nothing has worked.  Any ideas how I can get a full dump of my poor phone's contents?  Edit  Currently running a adb pull /sdcard/ ... Its copying files presently, but its too early to tell if its going to get evertying I'm expecting.  Edit #2  looks like its going to work...its taking a rather long time, but it appears to be grabbing everything I was expecting it to. A doubt on the definition of limit of a function definition I want to prove the definition of limit of a function from definition (1) to definition (2).  (1) A function $f(x)$ is said to have $f^*$ as the limit as $x$ tends $x^*$ iff for every sequence $\{x_n\}$ with limit $x^*$, the limit $\lim_{n-&gt;\infty}f(x_n)$ exists and is equal to $f^*$. (2) A function is said to have $f^*$ as the limit as $x$ tends $x^*$ iff for each $\epsilon &gt;0$, there exists a $\delta_\epsilon &gt;0$ such that $|f(x)-f^*| &lt;\epsilon \forall |x^*-x|&lt;\delta_\epsilon$  I am confused about the steps. Suppose I am given an $\epsilon &gt; 0$ and $x^*$. I have to show the existence of a $\delta_\epsilon &gt;0$ such that for all $x$ satisfying  $|x^*-x|&lt;\delta_\epsilon$ I can construct a sequence $x_n$ which converges to $x^*$ and $x_n=x$ for some $n \geq N$. Then I can say that $f(x_n)-f^*=f(x)-f^* &lt; \epsilon$. I think I may have made some mistake about the steps.  My main confusion is the following : Suppose I choose $\delta_\epsilon=\epsilon$. Then if a sequence $\{x_n\}$ converges to $x^*$ then $x_n=x$ (where $x$ satisfies $|x-x^*|&lt;\epsilon$) for some $n\geq N$. Now, $\lim_{n-&gt;\infty}f(x_n)$ exists implies there exists an $M$ such that $\forall n\geq M$, $f(x_n)-f^* &lt;\epsilon$. Now, I need to show that for some $n \geq M$ indeed $x_n=x$. How do I show that ? This $M$ and $N$ are different. We know that wizards in the Harry Potter universe are subject to regular physical harm (e.g. witness injuries from being hit by Bludgers or just colliding with things when playing Quidditch).  Therefore, it's almost a certainty that an average wizard would be vulnerable to, say, a bunch of bullets.   There may likely be spell(s) to protect from projectiles - witness Dumbledore's  deployed when Voldemort sent a bunch of glass at him during the  at the end of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (according to , possibly an unusually powerful Protego or the Silver shield).   But:   those spells obviously take effort/energy/time to cast (not everyone's Dumbledore) AND more likely than not most Death Eaters wouldn't recognize a Muggle gun for a threat (or realize what kind of threat) till too late.   So, the guns should at best allow an over-matched OotP member (e.g. Harry or Hermione) to greatly equalize the power between any regular Death Eaters and themselves, and even perhaps help against Voldemort (who can't be killed with a bullet, but, at best, would need to expend magical energy and time into conjuring a shield, and, at worst, be stopped/interrupted/driven off).  So I'm looking for an explanation - ideally in-universe, but possibly just some statement by JKR - of why the Muggle-born OotP - who are likely very much at ease AND familiar with Muggle technology and live in the late 20th century - do not use guns. Or, for that matter, ANY Muggle technology of the late 20th century? Cue Arthur C. Clarke's "indistinguishable from magic" meme.  Even if they are on some kind of idiotic moral crusade to never kill their opponents (even the Jedi aren't this dumb), given the time-frame, non-lethal weapons would have already existed, such as rubber bullets and tasers.  NOTE: Please don't offer the "if they do it, Death Eaters would start using guns as well" theory. First, Death Eaters would have used the guns if they knew how to, anyway. Second, the guns, like any "secret weapon", could be reserved for strategic battles, say the defense of Hogwarts in Deathly Hallows.    The origin of the question stems from two things.  First, Harry's fascination with all things that are different in the magical world (e.g. moving photographs), based on his knowledge of the Muggle material world, as well as the somewhat amusing cluelessness of the "Muggle artifacts" expert, Mr. Weasley, regarding Muggle items and how they work.   Basically, from the books, it's clear that the Wizarding world wouldn't know details about guns or what they are for or how they work.  The second thing is it's clear, at least initially, that wizards are afraid of Muggles finding out about them. Hence all the efforts to cloak their society (basically, do you REALLY want every Muggle gunning for you, even with Magic)? The idea of how control over the Muggle world seems to be more indirect, by Death Eaters asserting mind-control over the government. This means there's an implicit understanding by Death Eaters that they don't stand a chance against armed Muggles even given the magical disparity.  Considering Harry and Hermione's overall adaptability and inventiveness (and brains in the latter case), it's mind-boggling that the idea of fighting Death Eaters with modern technology completely slipped their mind. I mean, it's a basic part of human myth (see Steel vs. Magic themes in Conan books, or Beowulf, or heck, A Yankee in King Arthur's Court). So it's not like the idea of using technology against magic would be impossible to come up with. The question begs itself - why not? Considering the fact that Rowling generally tried to be logical and consistent in building the HP universe, I feel like there must be some in-universe explanation for this that I just didn't notice.   (in-universe answers only unless there are some authoritative out-of-universe statements that are part of canon). Why mass terms are forbidden? I would like to clarify my understanding on why mass terms in Lagrangians of gauge theories are forbidden.  It's often repeated that particle masses are forbidden by electroweak symmetry because it is a chiral theory. I want to make a distinction between fermionic masses and gauge boson masses.   Looking through the transformations of gauge boson mass terms, it seems that these are in fact always forbidden by their respective gauge symmetry. Is this correct? (So if there was no SU(2) symmetry, the photon and gluon would still need to be massless?)  In which case, the electroweak symmetry is actually responsible for forbidding all other mass terms (i.e. weak boson masses and fermion masses) due to the usual chiral arguments. Is this correct? pgfplots - barplot with multiple bars on same coordinate, but labelled differently I'm showing several data sets next to each other using multiple \addplot commands within a pgfplots axis environment. These are then further grouped into categories. The output of the graph per se is fine, however, I need each bar to be labelled separately - basically, I want the legend to be displayed directly underneath its corresponding element. I presume a picture will illustrate my problem more clearly:     I prepared an MWE:  \documentclass{minimal} \usepackage{pgfplots}  \begin{document}  \pgfplotstableread{ 0 35569 8842    134984   1 30428 4689    34077 2 32920 6207    73787    3 16462 7562    23496    4 12315 8572    16565    5 76572 19572   26030    }\dataset \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[ybar,         width=.9\textwidth,         ymin=0,         ymax=150000,                 ylabel={Y-Label},         xtick=data,         xticklabels = {             Category 1,             Category 2,             Category 3,             Category 4,             Category 5,             Category 6         },         major x tick style = {opacity=0},         minor x tick num = 1,         minor tick length=2ex,         ] \addplot[draw=black,fill=black!20] table[x index=0,y index=1] \dataset; %Data1 \addplot[draw=black,fill=black!40] table[x index=0,y index=2] \dataset; %Data2 \addplot[draw=black,fill=black!60] table[x index=0,y index=3] \dataset; %Data3 \legend{Data1,Data2,Data3} \end{axis}  \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document}