As you can see, it starts bugging up, it's pretty hard to explain it, but look at the picture.  Demo:     Markdown:  **http://url.com/user?u=__username__**
In the answer , the parser breaks my URL link.  The URL was with __word__:      http://www.open-mpi.de/projects/hwloc/doc/v1.2/group__hwlocality__membinding.php#gade5e2c28ea8475a479bf2b1df36c6ccd   After parsing, it becomes (&lt;a href is broken; no clickable link):  hwlocality_membinding.php#gade5e2c28ea8475a479bf2b1df36c6ccd"&gt;http://www.open-mpi.de/projects/hwloc/doc/v1.2/group_hwlocality_membinding.php#gade5e2c28ea8475a479bf2b1df36c6ccd   Short test:  http://example.com/_test_ -> test"&gt;http://example.com/test  Or if I put in a naked URL with _test_ just here:
I want to know by an example how prices in stock market changes Let us assume there is a listed company x. Currently it has 100 shares issued to trade in free float market. Current price of stock is let say 10. Now please let me know if I purchase one share of company x at the market price of 10. How it will effect the stock price. And please add and exemplify some other scenarios whichever you find good to explain more. For more information let say promoters of the company holds 100 shares with them like 50% of the company is with promoters and the other half is with people who invest or trade in that company. If I've missed to tell or assume any other vital info. needed please assume it yourself while mentioning it. Thank You Does it look good to edit the question you're answering? I have a question about editing practices:  Does it look good to edit a question you have just answered?  For example: say I had just answered a question, then saw that the question had some minor formatting issues. Should I edit it? Does it turn up voters off when they see that I am answering a question I changed, possibly to better suit my answer? Review-beta: Obviously good answer in low-quality How can I prevent Overflow for the Gamma function? I have a Dirichlet distribution from which I'm maximizing $\alpha$ by calculating the log likelihood with the following equation  $p\left(s|\alpha\right) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^O\log\left(\frac{n_i!}{\prod\limits_{j=1}^kn_{ij}!}\frac{\Gamma\left(\alpha_0\right)}{\Gamma\left(\sum\limits_{j=1}^k\left(n_{ij}+a_j\right)\right)} \prod\limits_{j=1}^k \frac{\Gamma\left(n_{ij}+\alpha_j\right)}{\Gamma\left(\alpha_j\right)}\right)$  I have a python script to calculate the log likelihood. It works for small values, but when $n_{ij}$ gets high $\Gamma\left(\sum\limits_{j=1}^k\left(n_{ij}+a_j\right)\right)$ and $\Gamma\left(n_{ij}+\alpha_j\right)$ python runs into overflow error (the max for math.gamma is between 171 and 172).   Is there a way to change the likelihood function so that $\Gamma\left(\sum\limits_{j=1}^k\left(n_{ij}+a_j\right)\right)$ and $\Gamma\left(n_{ij}+\alpha_j\right)$ don't run into overflow errors. Can I just divide the values in $\Gamma$ by for example 100, if I then compare the likelihood between $p(s|\alpha)$ with different $\alpha$ values do the best $\alpha$ values still have the highest likelihood? Is it possible to automatically "add" \left and \right commands in front of all brackets? The source code should be left intact, but LaTeX should interpret every pair of brackets as if they were preceded by such commands. This is because adding \left and \right commands is time consuming and makes source code longer and less readable. I considered defining new commands such as \lb and \rb for \left( and \right), but it doesn't seem very elegant to me: what if I also want to add square brackets for example?  Any ideas? Thanks. SINGLE_EMAIL_LIMIT_EXCEEDED. What does it mean? Canonical Post #2: What is the perfect, and how should I use it? When my phone MOTOROLA G3(2015) is updated to Marshmallow, its not showing files when connected to PC. While connecting, it shows options as charing only, PTP, MTP, MIDI. When I select MTP, it shows the external card, but not showing the contents, where as internal memory is detected and all files are shown. If I have several classes with functions that I need but want to store separately for organisation, can I extend a class to have both?  i.e. class a extends b extends c  edit: I know how to extend classes one at a time, but I'm looking for a method to instantly extend a class using multiple base classes - AFAIK you can't do this in PHP but there should be ways around it without resorting to class c extends b, class b extends a Solve a linear system with more variables than equations Show that $E(X)=\int_{0}^{\infty}P(X\ge x)\,dx$ for non-negative random variable $X$ Are there any XSLT processing command line tools? Allow people to answer protected questions if they have earned at least some amount of combined SE rep The purpose of protected questions is, according to the message presented on such a question, "to prevent 'thanks!', 'me too!', or spam answers by new users." The more verbose  agrees on the purpose. And the  says this is why protected questions exist:     Some questions are protected because they are expected to attract   either spam or users -- often new users -- who may mistake the site as   a traditional forum, posting "noisy" answers such as "Thank you" or   "This worked for me" or "I'm also having this problem".   Considering this, shouldn't a user be able to answer protected questions if they have gained at least 10 rep on any stack exchange site? If they've already demonstrated one site that they are familiar enough with the SE Q/A format to not be a drive-by useless answerer, shouldn't that confidence in them carry over to other SE sites?  Or maybe at some level of combined SE rep this restriction should be waived. I find it silly that at 15k+ combined network rep, I'm unable to answer a protected question on a SE site I've just started using. Why did Voldemort hide two Horcruxes in Hogwarts? The most common way to refer to non-immediate family? Transformer, how the primary current is adjusted to be equal to the secondary load (without considering magnetizing current)? I am happy to always not understand how does a transformer works ... One answer give me 10 questions ... (So I suggest you to not answer to this question, if you do not want to have more questions :D)  Here is the circuit :     So I put the "coupling" factor to 1, in order to have no leakage inductance and I set the value of the inductors very high in order to have a very low magnetizing current. So the primary current is approximately equal to the secondary current. My question is the following : How the primary current can reach an equilibrium to be equal to the secondary load current ? I will not accept answer which tells Pout is equal to ... So Pin is equal to Pout... There is something happenning into the transformer ...   Thank you very much and have a nice day ! This image is what's supposed to look like in Edit Mode/Object Mode(although I still can make these screenshots even after the update by pressing F12 which is rendering) but the following is what my donut looks like now in Blender.  It shows no shadows and colors. The only thing I did is updating blender to 2.81 from 2.80. And I don't know what but something seems off with blender. Sometimes I can't click any objects so I just pressed tab and then now it's all clickable. Seems like I was in edit mode, but to me, it looked exactly like object mode. I don't know what is wrong with it. How do I make my colors show up again? Show that the function $f: S \to \mathbb R$ given by $$f(x,s,t):=-\ln(st - ||x||^2)$$ is convex on $$S := \left\{(x,s,t) \in \mathbb R^n \times \mathbb  R \times \mathbb R: \frac{\|x\|^2}{s}&lt;t, s&gt;0, t&gt;0 \right\}$$   $-\ln(x)$ is a convex monotonic decreasing function, hence we can use composition by showing the inner part is concave. Also we know $-||x||^2$ is concave and $st$ is neither convex nor concave on $S$. Also in $S$ we have $st&gt;||x||^2$ but I was unable to show the convexity of the function as a whole How to read exponential expressions, e.g., "2^16"? How do you say the mathematical function in English:     x^y (or xy)   For example, how do you say      2^16  (or 216)   I know ^ means 'power' or 'exponentiate', but that is the name of the operation, not how you pronounce its use.  If y = 2, it is 'x squared', y=3 then 'x cubed'. What if y is some other arbitrary number? What's a good SSH tunneling client for OS X? I've been using SSH Tunnel manager to easily set up and stop port tunneling over SSH to various servers at my company. That saved me the pain of opening up a new terminal window which will hang out there just for the sake of having a tunnel open.  This worked great (well , sort of) but SSH Tunnel Manager is a PowerPC application. With Lion, it is not supported any more.  What is a good replacement?