In my CV, I have following type of information.      Gave a talk on "Tits System, Monomial Matrices and BN pairs" as a part of ’Late Night   Seminar Series’ in IISER Mohali     Attended a Workshop on ’Hyperbolic Knot Theory’ oraganised at IISER Pune from 7   December to 17 December 2015    Should I add a full stop at the end? My instincts says yes becasue although it is written in bullet points format, they are complete sentences.
In a 'bulleted' list should items that happen to be complete sentences end with a period?
"EOL while scanning single-quoted string"? (backslash in string) How to resolve a Java Rounding Double issue Seems like the subtraction is triggering some kind of issue and the resulting value is wrong.  double tempCommission = targetPremium.doubleValue()*rate.doubleValue()/100d;   78.75 = 787.5 * 10.0/100d  double netToCompany = targetPremium.doubleValue() - tempCommission;   708.75 = 787.5 - 78.75  double dCommission = request.getPremium().doubleValue() - netToCompany;   877.8499999999999 = 1586.6 - 708.75  The resulting expected value would be 877.85.  What should be done to ensure the correct calculation? I am trying to render this scene above [Snap-shot 1]. But when i am trying to render the scene, its showing me the result [Snap-shot 2]. Whats wrong with my blender [2.72] Finite Sum of Power? Deciphering the .NET clr20r3 exception parameters P1..P10 If I could stop ALL motion would I stop time? I've never really understood time. Time is not a force. It isn't energy or matter. Time doesn't MAKE anything do anything. Time doesn't make a clock tick (motion or batteries do). Time doesn't make the earth revolve around the sun (motion/gravity does). I don't think time exists. People say time is used as a form of measurement but aren't we just measuring movement? Even atomic clocks measure the movement of electrons that orbit an atom's nucleus as they "jump" back and forth between energy states. So my question is if I were to stop ALL motion (even movement of electrons that orbit an atom's nucleus) would I stop time? Is time just masquerading as the measurement of motion?  EDIT: This question is not a duplicate of "Does time freeze at Absolute Zero?" Because I am NOT talking about temperature. I am speaking about the motion of ALL things. I am asking if ALL things (photons, energy, matter, forces) stop moving would time stand still? I would have to say yes it would. If ALL motion were to stop for a million years and then start again no one would even know. Atomic clocks wouldn't even miss a step. Bash: Syntax Error on @() How to install the latest stable version of Chromium? How can I recover contact information from a stolen phone? Ought we only form beliefs based on sufficient empirical evidence? In , John Loftus often makes statements like:  Faith, as I argue, is an irrational leap over the probabilities. Probabilities about such a matter are all that matter. We should think exclusively in terms of them. (19) If God created us as reasonable people, then the correct religious faith should have sufficient evidence for it, since that’s what reasonable people require. (22) Because science is the only game in town. It works. It produces the goods. There isn’t a better alternative. (119)  Loftus' attitude seems representative among many atheists; while I'm aware that there are other views, it is this kind of view which leads to the title of this question: Ought we only form beliefs based on sufficient empirical evidence? Here are some sub-questions which may help guide answers:  How can we get an ought from an is, given that evidence only describes what is? Reformulating the title as a hypothetical imperative doesn't seem to help, because the scientific method doesn't seem to ever make a hypothetical imperative binding. And yet, surely those who would agree with the quoted text would find certain hypothetical imperatives binding?  Given that the scientific method includes &quot;basic arithmetical truths and also certain truths about formal provability&quot;,  seems to apply: a given axiomatic formulation of the scientific method will be unable to imply certain (virtually all, it turns out) truths. To say that science is complete—there are no other methods of knowing things—seems to imply that science is inconsistent. Is this 'seems' an illusion?  Does the scientific method require that we make observations prior to forming hypotheses? It could be argued that probabilistically, trying to come up with hypotheses before making a 'sufficient' number of observations will result in a failed hypothesis too much of the time. Is there evidence to support this which can probabilistically rule out all other kinds of hypothesis-forming?  Must we accept any unfalsifiable claims? The answer seems to be 'yes', given e.g. the example of crystal structure discussed by Michael Polanyi in  (43-48, 1984 paperback). A set of geometries seemed to well-describe many crystals found in nature, and even if some crystals aren't well-described, that doesn't falsify the instances in which it does. This opens up the question of which unfalsifiable claims we ought to accept.  If we model human reasoning as , we can ask what is meant by 'sufficient' by what the 'probabilities' are, prior to any observations: what  ought we start with? I am tempted to say &quot;the most effective one&quot;, but that presupposes a purpose; are we given an objective purpose?   I am left with the suspicion that one ought to only follow the scientific method to the extent that one only wants to predict one's future observations—this smells like a tautology. It seems to beg the question to say that the most important area of 'truth' is objective reality, a question which cannot be answered with the scientific method. A 'yes' answer to the main question would seem to fall prey to something like  of .  I was tempted to phrase my question as:  Is science the only source of truth?  I believe this is a bad question, for a few reasons:  We care about whether a method can reliably arrive at truth/knowledge. The terms 'truth' and 'knowledge' would possibly stir a debate about , which may not be a prerequisite for the answer to my question. My question makes explicit that we are talking about what one ought to do, which is not explicit in the above formulation. How do I make a Theme from scratch for Unity? I'd like to make a theme from scratch for Unity.  What knowledge and information/skills are needed? Are there any tools or templates out there for something like this already? I don't have any Python experience so tools biased towards beginners are preferable. Definite integral, quotient of logarithm and polynomial: $I(\lambda)=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\ln ^2x}{x^2+\lambda x+\lambda ^2}\text{d}x$ I was thinking this integral : $$I(\lambda)=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\ln ^2x}{x^2+\lambda x+\lambda ^2}\text{d}x$$ What I do is use a Reciprocal subsitution, easy to show that: $$I(\lambda)=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\ln ^2x}{\lambda ^2x^2+\lambda x+1}\text{d}x =\frac{1}{\lambda}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{(\ln x-\ln \lambda)^2}{x^2+x+1}\text{d}x \\ =\frac{\ln ^2\lambda}{\lambda}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^2+x+1}\text{d}x+\frac{1}{\lambda}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\ln ^2x}{x^2+x+1}\text{d}x \\ =\frac{\ln ^2\lambda}{\lambda}\frac{2\pi}{3\sqrt{3}}+\frac{2}{\lambda}\int_0^1\frac{\ln ^2x}{x^2+x+1}\text{d}x$$ But I hav no idea on process the remaining integral:( Anyone knows how to solve it?  THX guys! I came with another method might work for this: Recall the handy GF $$\frac{1}{x^2+x+1}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\sin \left(\frac{2\pi}{3}\left(k+1\right)\right)x^k$$ Then we have :  $$\int_0^1\frac{\ln ^2x}{x^2+x+1}\text{d}x=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{2}{\left(k+1\right)^3}\sin \left(\frac{2\pi}{3}\left(k+1\right)\right)x^k$$ With $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sin (kx)}{k^3}=\frac{\pi ^2}{6}x-\frac{\pi}{4}x^2+\frac{x^3}{12}$$ What can we arrived? How to place a .png texture with transparency over a material Badge Name is Blue? Now some random badges on the Profile page for the mobile web is now blue! This is seemingly weird as the default and now permanent color for Badge name text is white. Here's the problem here:     Ahhhh! Now it has invaded the desktop/computer version too! Now seemingly, every version has badges with blue text. Android app has the same issues too! Can the badge color be fixed from blue to white on the mobile version please? I'm working on the following problem set.  Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space and $A$ and $B$ orthogonal subspaces of $\mathcal{H}$.  Prove or disprove:  1) $A \oplus B$ is closed, then $A$ and $B$ are closed.  2) $A$ and $B$ are closed, then $A \oplus B$ is closed.  I could prove 1) and if my proof is correct, it even holds if $\mathcal{H}$ is just an inner product space.  Unfortunately, I can't manage to prove 2). Since $\mathcal{H}$ is by assumption a Hilbert space and I didn't use that fact to prove 1), I should probably use it here.  It means that $A$ and $B$ are also complete. Given some convergent sequence in $A \oplus B$, I want to show that the limit is also in  $A \oplus B$. Here I'm stuck. I want to use the completeness of $A$ and $B$, but I don't see how to obtain suitable Cauchy sequences.  Can anyone drop me a hint? Or is my approach all wrong? Drag and drop not working inside Nautilus on Ubuntu 17.10 Is there any way to deserialize JSON into an object using JSON.deserialize if some of the property names in the JSON are reserved words in apex? I want to do something like this:  string jsonString = '{"currency" : "ABC"}'; public class JSONResult {     public string currency; } JSONResult res = (JSONResult) JSON.deserialize(jsonString, JSONResult.class); system.debug(res);   but of course I get an error that the identifier name is reserved. Sketch complex curve $z(t) = e^{-1t+it}$, $0 \le t \le b$ for some $b>0$ How to back up my entire system? If I want to make a backup of my entire OS (including but not just my home directory), how do I go about this?    Is it as simple as backing up everything in / and then when if I suffer a crash, just copying the files back over? Will this cover grub, and how do I actually do this when the system is inoperable? Range of A and null space of the transpose of A So I'm complete stuck with something. I know it the following statements are true (or at least the seem to be from the results that I got from messing around with it a bit on MATLAB), but I don't understand why they are true or how to show so. Let $A$ be and $m$X$n$ matrix. Show that:  a) if $x \in N(A^TA)$ then $Ax$ is in both $R(A)$ and $N(A^T)$.   For this one I messed around with it with my own examples and I got $Ax=0$, therefore satisfing the statement, but I don't understand what's actually going on.   b) $N(A^TA)=N(A)$  again, makes sense when I see the results in MATLAB, but don't undestand why it works.  c) $A$ and $A^TA$ have the same rank  d) If $A$ has linearly independent columns, the $A^TA$ is nonsingular.  For the last two I have no idea on how to even start showing the relationship. I feel like I'm missing some crucial relationship between $A$ and $A^TA$, but I'm just not seeing it.   I would greatly appreciate any help of sugestions on how to show that these statements are true.   Thank you very much.