Splitting regular polygons into same-height segments I have vector layer which looks like this:  It is result of raster classification, vectorization and finally Minimum Bounding Box Geometry. What I need is, that maximum "height" of one polygon is for example 20 cm. It means the small rectangles stay the same as they are smaller than this threshold, but the "long ones" divide into several smaller polygons. After I will create centroids and count number of these polygons in one row, so first I need to have the small polygon segments.
Splitting all polygon features in a shapefile into smaller equal width polygons I have a shapefile of thousands of polygon features, that i would like to break up into smaller pieces (i.e. break a square into 8 equal pieces). I have read all over these boards for the right solution and haven't found one yet unfortunately. I've tried parcel editor but that only allows you to manually edit one feature at a time, and I've tried fishnet but that doesn't run through each individual feature it just processes across the entire extent of the shapefile. I have the full license for ArcGIS so all options are game. Ultimately I would like to be able to split this initial shapefile of features into a specified amount of equal width slots that each would be their own feature in the resulting shapefile.  Any thoughts?
Does there exist a matrix $\mathbf{A}\in\mathbb{R}^{3\times3}$ such that $\mathbf{A}^{2}=-\mathbf{I}$? Is it possible for a matrix $\mathbf{A}\in\mathbb{R}^{3\times3}$,  $$\mathbf{A}^2=-\mathbf{I}$$  I know that It is possible for $2\times2$ matrix, but is it possible for $3\times3$ matrix ? If $f(x)=x-\int^{\frac{\pi}{2}}_0f(x)\sin(x)dx$ find the explicit function for $f(x)$ in its simplest form Too much sugar in soup -- how to make it less cloying? I was making this recipe: , which was from the old Lincoln Del, one of my mom's favourite places. I mistakenly doubled the sugar, putting in 1/2 a cup instead of a 1/4 of a cup. Given the 2/3 of a cup ketchup, which was Heinz, the soup turned out way, way too sweet.   Is there any way I can rescue this? File permissions and saving So, i want to make a timer that will turn on/off a circuit. I want to turn on the connected device at 08:00 and stop it at 20:00, so the interval is 12 hours. Correct me if i'm wrong but i can't use IC 555(or another IC), i'll need some huge resistors/capacitors. Is there another way to build that other than using a microcontroller? My gaming computer is currently downloading Napoleon: Total War and Supreme Commander 2 which I purchased on Steam, and which will take some time to complete. While this download is going on, I would like to play some of my other multiplayer games on my laptop, but I would rather not interrupt the download to do so.   Is it possible to have both computers logged in at once? I know if I was playing a single player game, I could set Steam into offline mode, then resume the download on the other computer, but this won't work for multi player games. How to self study Linear Algebra I have no idea if this question is appropriate for this forum, but I hope you guys can overlook the fact that I asked it on a wrong forum (if I did) and still help me answer it (of course, if this is indeed the wrong forum for the type of question I'm about to ask, do please say so).  I am a 16 year old guy who is passionate about physics and as a result wants to increase his knowledge in mathematics, the language of physics. I've read and heard a lot about Linear Algebra and how crucial it is to physics and I am deeply motivated to self study this intriguing part of mathematics. However, I have limited knowledge of maths. I (for example) know basic algebra, trig, diff/int calc and some analytical geometry, but I wouldn't say I master these subjects past the high school curriculum. Now my question is: Would you kind people say I am able to self study Linear algebra or is it too tough and/or does it require too much of a math background? And are there any good books out there for BEGINNERS in LA? I found this (free) e-book called: Elementary Linear Algebra by Kenneth Kuttler and another one called 'Linear Algebra: Theory and its applications' also by Kuttler? Are these any good? Or would you recommend other books? If you guys have any tips regarding books for LA but also tips in general, please, I'd appreciate them! If $P(|X-19.1| \leq a) = 0.98$ then why is it necessarily $P(\frac{X-19.1}{17} \leq \frac{a}{17})= 0.99$? Calculation of limit without stirling approximation $\lim n^n/(e^nn!)=0$ using Stirling approximation it is obvious. But can we do it without using Stirling approximation.  Now series with terms $x^n n^n/n!$ has ROC $1/e$. What we can say about behaviour of power series at endpoints? Why is brace expansion not supported? Do I have to do any configuration to start brace expansion? When I run mkdir {1..10}, it just creates a dir naming {1..10}. I am trying to think of a non-colloquial word or phrase that means "practice what you preach." I would appreciate any suggestions. Thank you! I use (and have it much bigger) drive D: to store all my user data and games, but I have installed the Steam client on drive C:. When I was installing a first game (Warhammer 40000), I've chosen to place my library folder on drive D: and the game went there.  But now as I've got installed the second game (Portal), I can see that it was put on drive C: despite to the choice I've done previously. When I open Steam - Settings - Downloads + Cloud - Steam library folders, I can see both installation places in the list. Can I merge them into one?  I would even agree to use the default drive C: library (as I've replaced it with a symlink already). When I press to remove one library it says it can only remove empty ones. What is the Python equivalent of static variables inside a function? What is the idiomatic Python equivalent of this C/C++ code?  void foo() {     static int counter = 0;     counter++;     printf("counter is %d\n", counter); }   specifically, how does one implement the static member at the function level, as opposed to the class level? And does placing the function into a class change anything? How do I free up disk space? My Ubuntu cloud server has left only 900MB of disk space.   I'll just empty the directory /tmp and wondering if there is any other location to clean up. How to keep glasses dry in the rain? What is the difference between these two:     Suzuki was nearly close to go out of business just after the World War period.   Vs.     Suzuki was nearly close to going out of business just after the World War period.(from a video)   When talking about the past, do these two sentences different from each other? Like, if you use verbing(going) with infinitive(to) in the past, does it mean that there is another event happening? Or none. Suppose we want to define a first-order language to do set theory (so we can formalize mathematics). One such construction can be found . What makes me uneasy about this definition is that words such as "set", "countable", "function", and "number" are used in somewhat non-trivial manners. For instance, behind the word "countable" rests an immense amount of mathematical knowledge: one needs the notion of a bijection, which requires functions and sets. One also needs the set of natural numbers (or something with equal cardinality), in order to say that countable sets have a bijection with the set of natural numbers.  Also, in set theory one uses the relation of belonging "$\in$". But relation seems to require the notion an ordered pair, which requires sets, whose properties are described using belonging...  I found the following in Kevin Klement's,  (pages 2-3).  "You have to use logic to study logic. There’s no getting away from it. However, I’m not going to bother stating all the logical rules that are valid in the metalanguage, since I’d need to do that in the metametalanguage, and that would just get me started on an infinite regress. The rule of thumb is: if it’s OK in the object language, it’s OK in the metalanguage too."  So it seems that, if one proves a fact about the object language, then one can also use it in the metalanguage. In the case of set theory, one may not start out knowing what sets really are, but after one proves some fact about them (e.g., that there are uncountable sets) then one implicitly "adds" this fact also to the metalanguage.  This seems like cheating: one is using the object language to conduct proofs regarding the metalanguage, when it should strictly be the other way round.  To give an example of avoiding circularity, consider the definition of the integers. We can define a binary relation $R\subseteq(\mathbf{N}\times\mathbf{N})\times(\mathbf{N}\times\mathbf{N})$, where for any $a,b,c,d\in\mathbf{N}$, $((a,b),(c,d))\in R$ iff $a+d=b+c$, and then defining $\mathbf{Z}:= \{[(a,b)]:a,b\in\mathbf{N}\}$, where $[a,b]=\{x\in \mathbf{N}\times\mathbf{N}: xR(a,b)\}$, as in  question or  on Wikipedia. In this definition if set theory and natural numbers are assumed, then there is no circularity because one did not depend on the notion of "subtraction" in defining the integers.  So my question is:     Question Is the definition of first-order logic circular?   If not, please explain why.   If the definitions are circular, is there an alternative definition which avoids the circularity?   Some thoughts:   Perhaps there is the distinction between what sets are (anything that obeys the axioms) and how sets are expressed (using a formal language). In other words, the notion of a set may not be circular, but to talk of sets using a formal language requires the notion of a set in a metalanguage. In foundational mathematics there also seems to be the idea of first defining something, and then coming back with better machinery to analyse that thing. For instance, one can define the natural numbers using the Peano axioms, then later come back to say that all structures satisfying the axioms are isomorphic. (I don't know any algebra, but that seems right.) Maybe sets, functions, etc., are too basic? Is it possible to avoid these terms when defining a formal language? In ArcMap, when you export data to PDF it preserves the layering within the PDF so that you can turn on/off individual map layers (within the PDF itself).  When I export from QGIS to PDF, I don't appear to have the option for this.  Does QGIS support preserving layers when exporting to PDF?  Is there a special setting needed to enable this capability?  Or has anyone wrote a plugin for this feature? I'm a little confused about the following sentences. Could you please tell me which one(s) is/are correct?        The first and the second chapter are difficult.   The first and the second chapters are difficult.   The first and second chapters are difficult.   The first and second chapter are difficult.      I believe #1 &amp; #3 are correct, while #2 &amp; #4 are incorrect.  But when seeing the answers to the Quora question , I wonder why they say #2 is correct. Why am I not getting a java.util.ConcurrentModificationException in this example?