A few weeks ago, I inserted my pendrive into my college's PC to transfer my assignments, but it was not working. It was corrupted and was asking to format. I couldn't even copy files, and was forced to format.  After formatting, my pendrive's size was reduced from 8GB to 3.96MB.  Since then, I've been trying restore it. From diskpart to third-party software, Windows to Linux, watching several youtube videos, but nothing has worked.  I already have looked at , but nothing worked.  PS: I'm using 64-bit system to achieve restoration.
My USB drive used to be originally 8GB when I bought it.  I'm trying to reformatted in Windows 7 by right clicking on the drive and selecting Format.... But the capacity only shows 250MB.  Is there something I can do to get the original size back? Maybe it got partitioned in a weird way?   The  flash drive is a SanDisk Cruzer Micro 8GB. I got it from Wal-Mart but this is the same drive.
How is Cooper's age justified? If $a$, $b$, $c$ are the roots of $x^3-6x^2+3x+1=0$, find all possible values of $a^2b+b^2c+c^2a$ Let $a$, $b$, $c$ be the roots of $$x^3 - 6x^2 + 3x + 1 = 0$$ Find all possible values of $a^2 b + b^2 c + c^2 a$. Express all the possible values, in commas.  I've already tried to bash out all the roots, Vieta's Formula, and try to manipulate the equation to become easier to work with. However, Vieta's didn't get me anywhere, and I couldn't find a way to make the equation simpler or anything. Any hints to start this problem? I am trying to create something similar to this in Tikz:    I have been looking at using the \shadedraw macro, but have not found a way to create the color spectrum.  It seems possible if I stack multiple gradient-shaded rectangles on top of each other, but I would rather not use such a lengthy and ugly solution.  Is there a way to recreate this PH-scale image in Tikz, ideally using few rectangles?  (Note: the number labels are not necessary, as they will be replaced with horizontal lines anyway.) $x^3+x+1$ irreducible over $\mathbb{F}_2$, $\theta$ root, compute powers of $\theta$ Problem statement:     Show that $x^3+x+1$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{F}_2$ and let $\theta$ be a root. Compute the powers of $\theta$ in $\mathbb{F}_2$.   I am having trouble computing the powers of $\theta$. $x^3+x+1$ is irreducible, since any cubic polynomial over a field is reducible if and only if it has a root in the field. Since $\mathbb{F}_2=\{0,1\}$, we see that none of these is a root of $x^3+x+1$.  To compute the powers of $\theta$, note that $\theta^3+\theta+1=0$. Hence $\theta^3=-(\theta+1)$. Is this a good enough answer for $\theta^3$?  To compute $\theta^2$, note that $\theta = -(\theta^3+1)$. Therefore, $$\theta^2=(\theta^3+1)^2 = \theta^6 + 2\theta^3 + 1 = (-\theta-1)^2-2\theta-2+1,$$ which just reduces to $\theta^2$. Any ideas for computing these powers?  Thanks! Is there any difference between mapping and function? I wonder if there is any difference between mapping and a function. Somebody told me that the only difference is that mapping can be from any set to any set, but function must be from $\mathbb R$ to $\mathbb R$. But I am not ok with this answer. I need a simple way to explain the differences between mapping and function to a lay man together with some illustration (if possible).  Thanks for any help. Currently, the only way to link to a revision (clicking "link"), you just get  which shows what the post looked like at that revision:        Personally, I rarely use this and haven't ever found myself in a scenario (as far as I remember) where I would prefer the way it currently works to what I'm suggesting here.  Could we:   Add another link, or Change the current link   Such that it:   Displays the diff on a separate page (I'd prefer this, since the highlight and scroll thing doesn't always work properly - although perhaps it has something to do with loading images, so it might not apply here, or, if it doesn't, we could fix that instead), or          Highlights and scrolls to a diff, like what is done when you link to an answer () Has anyone had success recovering deleted files from an ext4 partition? I've tried various utilities, but none have worked yet. I'd be grateful if someone can share a success story! Sometimes when I'm making a sauce or soup that needs to be a bit spicy, I have no troubles spicing how I want to.  But if the dinner party is a bit late, or I made the sauce in advance to really draw out all the flavors of the spices, vegetables and meat, sometimes I end up with a way too spicy/hot dish.  You can always pour a bit water and try to dilute it a bit, but that also takes away all of the good flavor. So is there some trick that I'm missing I can use, when this happens to me (other than being more careful or using the spices later)? Why does editing posts on SO require a minimum of 6 charaters? I have just recently started editing the post on Stack Overflow.  I found some posts which only required 2-3 character changes like they had correct grammar but some mistakes in spelling.  When I tried to correct the spelling mistakes, and clicked on "edit", it said:  Edits must be at least 6 characters   I don't know why Stack Overflow added this limit. How can I edit only 3-4 characters in a post? Can Kakashi still use Susanoo after losing his Sharingan? When Kakashi had double Sharingan, he was able to use Susanoo. However, he lost the Sharingan.  Can he still use Susanoo without Sharingan now? How to find information about the system/machine in Unix? I have always found it difficult to find information about the system itself in Unix, whether it be   Which OS I am using (version number and all, to compare it with the latest available builds)? Which Desktop Environment am I using? If I am using KDE, most of the programs begin with a K and I can say I am using KDE, but there should be some way to query this, say from a script. Which kernel version am I using? (For example, I am using Fedora, and I want to know what Linux kernel version I am using)   Basically, what I miss is a single point/utility that can get all this information for me. Most of the times the solutions to the above would themselves be OS specific. Then, you are stuck. Am hesitant to ask yet one more embarrassing question, but I can't seem to see the problem with the \foreach in the MWE. It should produce several horizontal lines but only produces the one with the yValue as specified in the \newcommand{\yValue}{0.3}:  Code: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pgfplots}  \newcommand{\yValue}{0.3}  \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis} [  ymin=0,  ymax=1,  xmin=0,  xmax=1, ]  \foreach \yValue in {0.00,0.1,...,1.00} {     \draw [red] (axis cs:0,\yValue) -- (axis cs:1,\yValue); }  \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} Read/write to Windows registry using Java How is it possible to read/write to the Windows registry using Java? Retrieve Preview Image URL of Salesforce Image Files Why is compactness so important? I've read many times that 'compactness' is such an extremely important and useful concept, though it's still not very apparent why. The only theorems I've seen concerning it are the Heine-Borel theorem, and a proof continuous functions on R from closed subintervals of R are bounded. It seems like such a strange thing to define; why would the fact every open cover admits a finite refinement be so useful? Especially as stating "for every" open cover makes compactness a concept that must be very difficult thing to prove in general - what makes it worth the effort?  If it helps answering, I am about to enter my third year of my undergraduate degree, and came to wonder this upon preliminary reading of introductory topology, where I first found the definition of compactness. I was querying data from  using a LINQ query in LINQPAD and found that the data I got back is quite obsolete. I searched for Shekhar-Pro (me) by using a where clause on ID 399722 and the data returned was for 8 Jan 2011. Why was the data so old? Isn't the data updated in real time, or at least frequently? If not, where can I get realtime data? I am comfortable with the different sizes of infinities and Cantor's "diagonal argument" to prove that the set of all subsets of an infinite set has cardinality strictly greater than the set itself. So if we have a set $\Omega$ and $|\Omega| = \aleph_i$, then (assuming continuum hypothesis) the cardinality of $2^{\Omega}$ is $|2^{\Omega}| = \aleph_{i+1} &gt; \aleph_i$ and we have $\aleph_{i+1} = 2^{\aleph_i}$.  I am fine with these argument.  What I don't understand is why should there be a smallest $\infty$? Is there a proof (or) an axiom that there exists a smallest $\infty$ and that this is what we address as "countably infinite"? or to rephrase the question "why can't I find a set whose power set gives us $\mathbb{N}$"?  The reason why I am asking this question is in "some sense" $\aleph_i = \log_2(\aleph_{i+1})$. I do not completely understand why this process should stop when $\aleph_i = \aleph_0$.  (Though coming to think about it I can feel that if I take an infinite set with $\log_2 \aleph_0$ elements I can still put it in one-to-one correspondence with the Natural number set. So Is $\log_2 \aleph_0 = \aleph_0$ (or) am I just confused? If $n \rightarrow \infty$, then $2^n \rightarrow \infty$ faster while $\log (n) \rightarrow \infty$ slower and $\log (\log (n)) \rightarrow \infty$ even slower and $\log(\log(\log (n))) \rightarrow \infty$ even "more" slower and so on).  Is there a clean (and relatively elementary) way to explain this to me?  (I am totally fine if you direct me to some paper (or) webpage. I tried googling but could not find an answer to my question) How would I use Takeown to take ownership of all folders on one drive? How does linear regression use the normal distribution? Tourist to F1 change of status within 60 days I have a PhD place at a US university starting Aug 21 but want to visit a different university for casual research for 6 weeks from July 1. This is longer than the 30 day grace period for the F1. Can I arrive on the visa waiver program or tourist visa in July and then just stay on for the PhD? I guess I might need to change status. Will this work?  Please don’t suggest exiting and reentering, that’s too expensive.  (British masters student in UK)