When he moves in a circular motion very fast, there are large G-Forces acting on his body, even while he is wearing his suit.  This is similar to being in a G-Force simulator.                                  or like when you are in car that is turning left very fast.  Does his suit have ability to protect him from this G-Force? If it does, how does it work ?
Tony's suit is an engineering marvel, and they explain many facets of the technology to help give legitimacy to the special powers, abilities and weapons it has.  I never read the Iron Man comics, but in the movie they really don't have a technological explanation for how he miraculously seems to be unaffected by crushing G-forces of sudden acceleration, the inertia of sudden stops and hair-pin turns, and especially the blunt force trauma from getting smashed in the face with Thor's hammer.  Certainly it appears the suit takes punishment, but Tony always remains unscatched, never a collapsed lung, broken bone or even a bloody nose.  In my infantile understanding of theoretical physics, the same technology that would be used to counter G-forces and sudden blunt force trauma to the body inside would be the very same technology used for  which in my honest opinion would be a much more stunning technological achievement than his heralded Arc Reactor.  Was their ever an explanation proferred for this and if so was it indeed attributed to Anti-Gravity?
So I finally killed the Ender Dragon! As I was climbing the portal back to the world, I noticed that on top of the column there was an egg. So I attacked, mined, clicked and nothing happened, it just teleported away. What does the egg do and how do I get it? In Quantum Mechanics we usually consider operator-valued functions: these are functions that take in real numbers and gives back operators on the Hilbert space of the quantum system.  There are several examples of these. One of them is when we work with the Heisenberg picture, where we need to consider functions $\alpha : \mathbb{R}\to \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{H})$ such that $\alpha(t)$ is the operator at time $t$.  Another example is when we deal with exponentiation of operators, like when building the time evolution operator:  $$U(t,t_0)=\exp\left(-i\frac{H}{\hbar}(t-t_0)\right),$$  Here, the $\exp$ is usually understood as being defined via the eigenvalues of $H$.  The point is, the idea of a function $\alpha : \mathbb{R}\to \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{H})$ appears quite often in Quantum Mechanics, and sometimes one needs to differentiate these. In practice we do it formally, using all the properties we would expect, but I'm curious about how one would properly define this.  If we were dealing with bounded operators, then we could use the operator norm, which is available for this kind of operator, and define the derivative as we can usually we do when there's some norm around.  The point is that in Quantum Mechanics most of the time operators are unbounded.  So in the general case, how can one define the derivative of one operator-valued function? Why can a 1 element set be a member of another set but not a subset of it? I have came across this in a textbook:     $\{2\}\nsubseteq\{\{2\}\}$ but $\{2\}\in\{\{2\}\}$   I understand that $\{2\}$ is an element (member) of the other set but considering $\{2\}$ is a set itself, why is it not a subset? The limit of a sum $\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{n}{n^2+k^2}$ as $n\rightarrow\infty$ How to compute this limit:  $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac{n}{n^2+1^2}+\frac{n}{n^2+2^2}+\cdots+\frac{n}{n^2+n^2}\right)$$  Please give me some hint. Why isn't Harry Potter punished for using magic outside of Hogwarts in Prisoner of Azkaban? Correct tracked camera orientation Finding the closure of some subsets of the ordered square I need to find the closure of these sets on the ordered square: $$A = \{(1/n)\times 0 | n\in \mathbb{Z}_+\}$$ $$B = \{(1-1/n)\times \frac{1}{2}| n\in \mathbb{Z}_+\}$$ $$C = \{x\times 0 | 0&lt;x&lt;1\}$$ $$D = \{x\times \frac{1}{2}| 0&lt;x&lt;1\}$$ $$E = \{\frac{1}{2}\times y | 0&lt;y&lt;1\}$$ I know that the closure is just the set itself united with its limit points. For $A$, the set of limit points, I imagine, are $\{&lt;1,0&gt;\}$, that is, the $x$ coordinate is $1$ and the $y$ is $0$. But  is says the reverse. What am I getting wrong? Following the same reasoning, $B' = \{&lt;1,\frac{1}{2}&gt;\}$ $C' = \{&lt;0,0&gt;,&lt;0,1&gt;\}$ What am I doing wrong? Does every non-trivial subgroup of $S_9$ containing an odd permutation necessarily contain a transposition?    Here $S_9$ denotes the group of all permutations (i.e. bijections with itself) of the set $\{1,2, \ldots, 9 \}$ under the binary operation of composition of functions.   By a transposition is meant a permutation that leaves all elements except two fixed, mapping either of these two onto the other.   A permutation can only be expressed either as a product of an even number of transpositions or as a product of an odd number of transpositions (but not both) and as such is defined to be even or odd, respectively.   Reference: Fraleigh p. 95  Question 23d. in A First Course in Abstract Algebra How do I deal with a compromised server? This is a  about Server Security - Responding to Breach Events (Hacking)   See Also:                  Canonical Version I suspect that one or more of my servers is compromised by a hacker, virus, or other mechanism:   What are my first steps? When I arrive on site should I disconnect the server, preserve "evidence", are there other initial considerations? How do I go about getting services back online? How do I prevent the same thing from happening immediately again? Are there best practices or methodologies for learning from this incident? If I wanted to put a Incident Response Plan together, where would I start? Should this be part of my Disaster Recovery or Business Continuity Planning?   Original Version       2011.01.02 - I'm on my way into work at 9.30 p.m. on a Sunday because our server has been compromised somehow and was resulting in a    attack on our provider. The servers access to the Internet   has been shut down which means over 5-600 of our clients sites are now   down. Now this could be an FTP hack, or some weakness in code   somewhere. I'm not sure till I get there.      How can I track this down quickly? We're in for a whole lot of   litigation if I don't get the server back up ASAP. Any help is   appreciated. We are running Open SUSE 11.0.            2011.01.03 - Thanks to everyone for your help. Luckily I WASN'T the only person responsible for this server, just the nearest. We managed   to resolve this problem, although it may not apply to many others in a   different situation. I'll detail what we did.      We unplugged the server from the net. It was performing (attempting to   perform) a Denial Of Service attack on another server in Indonesia,   and the guilty party was also based there.      We firstly tried to identify where on the server this was coming from,   considering we have over 500 sites on the server, we expected to be   moonlighting for some time. However, with SSH access still, we ran a   command to find all files edited or created in the time the attacks   started. Luckily, the offending file was created over the winter   holidays which meant that not many other files were created on the   server at that time.      We were then able to identify the offending file which was inside the   uploaded images folder within a  website.      After a short cigarette break we concluded that, due to the files   location, it must have been uploaded via a file upload facility that   was inadequetly secured. After some googling, we found that there was   a security vulnerability that allowed files to be uploaded, within the   ZenCart admin panel, for a picture for a record company. (The section   that it never really even used), posting this form just uploaded any   file, it did not check the extension of the file, and didn't even   check to see if the user was logged in.      This meant that any files could be uploaded, including a PHP file for   the attack. We secured the vulnerability with ZenCart on the infected   site, and removed the offending files.      The job was done, and I was home for 2 a.m.            The Moral   - Always apply security patches for ZenCart, or any other CMS system for that matter. As when security updates are released, the whole   world is made aware of the vulnerability.   - Always do backups, and backup your backups.   - Employ or arrange for someone that will be there in times like these. To prevent anyone from relying on a panicy post on Server   Fault. "thanks for flagging" popup gets messed up when the comment is automatically deleted For some comments, the comment is automatically deleted when you raise a flag. This includes certain keywords and short +1 comments. But when you raise that flag with the new comment flag interface, the "thanks for flagging" shows up in the top right when the comment is deleted:      As opposed to what happens when you raise a flag on a comment that doesn't auto-delete: How to do multiple joins when using groupby in linq How do I fix gaps around my lean-to greenhouse? Java: split a List into two sub-Lists? Why's &quot;what's up&quot; used as greeting among young people? It sounds like asking &quot;what is up there&quot;?  A: What's up? B: The sky. BufferedWriter not writing everything to its output file Moderncv adding date of birth to personal information I'm doing my cv with the moderncv package and I'm using the classic style. I would like to add a date of birth line directly above the adress. Does anyone know how to do this? I've tried various solutions but they all seem to be broken. List AppDomains in Process Suppose that C is a closed convex subset of $\mathbb R^n$ and $x \in \mathbb R^n$. The projection of $\mathbf x$ onto C is the closest point $\mathbf y \in C : \mathbf z = \mathbf y$ minimizes ||$\mathbf z - \mathbf x$||$_2$ over all $\mathbf z \in C$.  (a) Show that the minimum exists.  (b) Show that there is only one minimizer: that is, show that if $\mathbf y_1$ and $\mathbf y_2$ both minimize ||$\mathbf x - \mathbf z$|| then $\mathbf y_1 = \mathbf y_2$   My ideas:  For (a), to show that the minimum exists I will need to show that it is closed and bounded. We already know it's closed because C is a closed convex subset so I just need to show it's bounded. Am I wanting to minimize ||$\mathbf x - \mathbf z$||$_2$? This is just the Euclidean norm which would be $\sqrt{(\mathbf z - \mathbf x)^2}$=$\sqrt{\mathbf z^2 -\mathbf z \mathbf x -\mathbf x \mathbf z + \mathbf x^2}$. I'm not sure where to go from here...  For (b) I want to use proof by contradiction- so I will assume that $\mathbf y_1$ and  $\mathbf y_2$ both minimize the function and then I'll somehow see that they are in fact equal. How do I set up this argument? Leaving the States on Visa Waiver and coming back I'm travelling on the ESTA visa waiver, I'm now in the States but would like to go to Costa Rica for a bit (say three weeks) then come back to the States. All will be within my 90 day limit.  Is that allowed?  (I have my onward ticket home.) We just bought a Lenovo  (which is supposed to have the Intel 8265 for wireless). This laptop was bought in part because it is certified to run Ubuntu and as such to me at least it would make sense for things to work out of the box... but no such luck.  First, I installed Ubuntu 17.10 and after installation realised Wi-Fi was not working. I also tried Ubuntu 16.04 from a USB drive since that is the version of Ubuntu it is certified for, but no luck there either.  The wireless chip is not detected by lshw (or even lspci by the looks of it), ip link does not show a wireless interface, and the iwlwifi kernel module is not loaded at boot (I can load this myself using modprobe iwlwifi but this does not make Wi-Fi work). I think it is a combined Wi-Fi/Bluetooth chip, and Bluetooth does appear to work (or at least Bluetooth shows up in Gnome and rfkill list).  modinfo iwlwifi | grep 8265 shows me a file ending in -34 is supposedly loaded but only a file ending in -33 (and some other lower numbers) is present in /lib/firmware, if that helps).  I have also installed the Linux 4.14.9 kernel in an attempt to get things to work, but this did not resolve the issue either.  Further information  root@ThinkPad-E570:~# modinfo iwlwifi | grep 8265 firmware:       iwlwifi-8265-34.ucode root@ThinkPad-E570:~# rfkill list all 0: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth     Soft blocked: no     Hard blocked: no 1: hci0: Bluetooth     Soft blocked: no     Hard blocked: no root@ThinkPad-E570:~# dmesg | grep iwl root@ThinkPad-E570:~# lspci -nnk | grep 0280 -A3 05:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device [10ec:c821]     Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:c024]   Update  I just noticed that the laptop does not have an Intel wireless chip at all, but in fact has a Realtek one... which means that the  of the shop I bought this laptop at were not accurate... Sigh. Same problem stands, however, just with a crappier wireless chip.