Can I Install Ubuntu with those hardwares Just bought a new computer, don't know if I could install Ubuntu on it.  I heard that ASrock motherboard has no official driver support for linux.  Here is the build list.  PCPartPicker part list:    CPU: AMD - Threadripper 1950X 3.4 GHz 16-Core Processor  ($584.00 @ Amazon)  CPU Cooler: Noctua - NH-U14S TR4-SP3 82.52 CFM CPU Cooler  ($79.90 @ Amazon)  Motherboard: ASRock - X399 Taichi ATX TR4 Motherboard  ($279.89 @ OutletPC)  Memory: Corsair - Vengeance LPX 64 GB (4 x 16 GB) DDR4-3200 Memory  ($399.99 @ Newegg)  Storage: Western Digital - SN750 1 TB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive  ($229.99 @ Amazon)  Storage: Seagate - Barracuda 2 TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  ($58.44 @ OutletPC)  Video Card: Gigabyte - GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11 GB AORUS Video Card (2-Way SLI)  ($1229.99 @ Newegg)  Video Card: Gigabyte - GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11 GB AORUS Video Card (2-Way SLI)  ($1229.99 @ Newegg)  Case: Corsair - 780T ATX Full Tower Case  ($179.99 @ Amazon)  Power Supply: Corsair - 1600 W 80+ Titanium Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply  ($339.99 @ Amazon)  Mouse: Logitech - G502 HERO Wired Optical Mouse  ($64.84 @ Amazon)
Will my device work with Ubuntu? I have a device on which I would like to install Ubuntu. How do I find out if Ubuntu will work on it?
Computing $\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\sin x}{x} \mathrm{d}x$ with residue calculus Can a deb package contain a PPA dependency and install packages from the PPA? When creating a .deb package I create a file named control that contains some fields:  Package: my-qt-app-name Version: 0.01 Architecture: all Maintainer: my name &lt;my email address&gt; Installed-Size: 2 Depends: some-package-from-ppa Section: extras Priority: optional Homepage: my homepage Description: some description   some-package-from-ppa is not installed on the computer. It can be installed only adding a PPA, running apt-get update and then apt-get install some-package-from-ppa.  Can a control file from a deb package contain a PPA address and install that package when the deb file is installed? It's so cool that the notification reminds you of the colour of badge you've earned. But I am a little puzzled by the symbols:      Is it feasible to use the symbol from the earned site? At the moment it uses the symbol from the site I happen to be on (as you can see by looking to the left of the dropdown in each case.) How to enable or disable services? Live notification shown for own edits When editing an answer, the &quot;new revision&quot; message is shown for a short moment. This makes no sense because the revision you just created is automatically displayed anyway. What are the differences between a HashMap and a Hashtable in Java? What are the differences between a  and a  in Java?  Which is more efficient for non-threaded applications? Solve $\frac1x+\frac1y=\frac1{pq}$ For $x,y\in\mathbb{N}$ how many ordered pairs $\left(x,y\right)$ satisfy   $\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{y}=\dfrac{1}{pq}$ where $p,q$ are distinct primes? What GUI applications are there to assist in generating graphics for TeX? I found  to be a useful tool to help generate code for graphs. I suppose there must be other tools to help draw diagrams such as Sets/Venn Diagrams or Electrical Circuits (Logic Gates). Which ones would you suggest? Ways of getting a number with $n$ dice, each with $k$ sides Assume the dice are numbered from $1$ to $k$. My hunch is that this will form a normal distribution with a median at $n\cdot\frac{k}{2}$. However, I have no idea as to    turn this fact into an answer (I have a minimal knowledge of stats, but I know that I am missing the standard distribution) and this is probably the wrong approach   How can I approach and solve this problem? (Aside, this is not for a class, stats or other, so any and all approaches welcome).  *Edit: * I want to find the number of ways that the sum of the numbers that are rolled has a particular value, if $n$ dice are rolled, and each has $k$ sides, numbered $1$ to $k$. Can someone remind me of the name of the author, the name of the hero and the name of the series if any? Adventure Sci-Fi books, short by today's epic standards ( = about same length as Heinlein's shorter youth books), probably published late 50s?, early 60s? by Bantam? or Del Rey? I think at least 30, possibly more than 40 books in the series. Not comic books. The author is not a well-known writer. At least, I don't remember seeing the name on any other books, ever.   Subject: a man who can move and respond to threats extremely fast learns about a secret potion that allows a person to change bodies with someone else and thus control them. A powerful organization does not want the secret to be known, because they use the potion to control politicians on many planets. The organization's goons are people who had surgeries to remove their emotions, and function like organic computers. They can communicate over interstellar distances and follow and murder anyone who learns the secret. I remember the following detail about the potion: there are two nearly identical molecules that have to be assembled in a certain sequence. Two of the components had to be switched around and that determined who would be dominant and who would be controlled during the mind switch / body swap.   Every book finds the hero on another planet with new adventures, and usually taking another deep-sleep-passage to another world, fleeing his pursuers. The background story about the secret potion is dished out little by little in each book.  One book in the series starts like this: hero is on very hot planet, diving for valuable marine life, catches a deadly fungus disease and is rescued last moment in exchange for his catch...  One of the themes that returns often is that the hero is an excellent knife fighter.  Of course he's a womanizer. In the second (or close to 2nd) book in the series, he's involved with a woman who rules a planet.  To travel to another world, he usually takes the cheapest dead-sleep passage, and there's always a 10-25% risk you won't wake up from that. What fallacy dismisses problems by presenting "bigger" problems? Wasn't really sure how to phrase this, but I'm thinking of an instance in which someone diminishes a problem by presenting one of larger scope - as a rather shoddy example, "x political problem in America doesn't matter because half the world's population is starving."  I honestly have no idea if this is considered fallacious or not, but for some odd reason I can't shake the feeling that someone has described it to me as a fallacy before. Am I crazy or is there something to this (or something similar)? AMPscript Error with XML I have a Partner sending some data to a Triggered Email/Data Extension which includes a column for XML data.   The trigger is erroring and not allowing the data to get to the Data Extension.   Below is what they are sending over. Is the formatting of the XML incorrect?  XML data that I've used in the past in Data Extensions starts with....   &lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?&gt;   This version of XML starts with... {"XML":  Could that be it?  {"To": {"SubscriberKey": "test@acme.com", "ContactAttributes": {"SubscriberAttributes": **{"XML":** "&lt;root&gt;&lt;ITEM&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_NAME&gt;dark chocolate nuts &amp; sea salt&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_NAME&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_SKU&gt;15127&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_SKU&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_URL&gt;https://www.test.com/15127.html&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_URL&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_IMG_URL&gt;https://www.test.com/images/nuts.png&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_IMG_URL&gt;&lt;ITEM_QTY&gt;1&lt;/ITEM_QTY&gt;&lt;ITEM_SUBSCRIPTION_PRICE&gt;12.59&lt;/ITEM_SUBSCRIPTION_PRICE&gt;&lt;ITEM_TOTAL&gt;12.59&lt;/ITEM_TOTAL&gt;&lt;/ITEM&gt;&lt;ITEM&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_NAME&gt;crunchy peanut butter&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_NAME&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_SKU&gt;41800&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_SKU&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_URL&gt;https://www.test.com/images/butter.png&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_IMG_URL&gt;&lt;ITEM_QTY&gt;1&lt;/ITEM_QTY&gt;&lt;ITEM_SUBSCRIPTION_PRICE&gt;11.37&lt;/ITEM_SUBSCRIPTION_PRICE&gt;&lt;ITEM_TOTAL&gt;9.55&lt;/ITEM_TOTAL&gt;&lt;/ITEM&gt;&lt;ITEM&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_NAME&gt;pear cinnamon &amp; pecan&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_NAME&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_SKU&gt;17227&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_SKU&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_URL&gt;https://www.test.com&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_URL&gt;&lt;ITEM_PRODUCT_IMG_URL&gt;https://www.test.com/images/apples.png&lt;/ITEM_PRODUCT_IMG_URL&gt;&lt;ITEM_QTY&gt;1&lt;/ITEM_QTY&gt;&lt;ITEM_SUBSCRIPTION_PRICE&gt;12.59&lt;/ITEM_SUBSCRIPTION_PRICE&gt;&lt;ITEM_TOTAL&gt;12.59&lt;/ITEM_TOTAL&gt;&lt;/ITEM&gt;&lt;/root&gt;", "SHIPPING_LNAME": "Tester", "FIRST_NAME": "Test", "LAST_NAME": "Tester", "ORDER_TOTAL_SAVINGS": -5.97, "MERCHANT_ORDER_ID": "1810002352", "SHIPPING_ADDRESS_STATE": "NY", "ORDER_PLACE_DATE_LONG": "Fri 11 January 2019", "SHIPPING_ADDRESS_ZIP": "10004", "ORDER_SHIPPING": 0.00, "CARD_TYPE": "Visa", "ORDER_SUBTOTAL": 47.32, "ORDER_PLACE_DATE_SHORT": "01/11/2019", "SHIPPING_FNAME": "Test", "SHIPPING_ADDRESS_TOWN": "new york", "ORDER_TOTAL": 47.32, "CARD_EXPIRE": "12/2027", "CARD_HOLDER": "Test Tester", "SHIPPING_ADDRESS_1": "75 broad st", "SHIPPING_ADDRESS_2": "fl 23"}}, "Address": "acme@test.com"}}   AMPSCRIPT IN EMAIL Calling the XML....  %%[   var @LOOPINGAPPENDIX  set @LOOPINGAPPENDIX = AttributeValue("LOOPINGAPPENDIX")  set @productRows = BuildRowSetFromXML(@LOOPINGAPPENDIX, "/root/ITEM", 0)  ]%%   %%[   for @j = 1 to RowCount(@productRows) do       set @productXML = Concat("", Field(Row(@productRows, @j), "XML"), "")      set @ITEMPRODUCTNAME = Trim(Field(Row(BuildRowSetFromXML(@LOOPINGAPPENDIX, "/root/ITEM/ITEM_PRODUCT_NAME", 0), 1), "Value"))      set @ITEMPRODUCTSKU = Trim(Field(Row(BuildRowSetFromXML(@LOOPINGAPPENDIX, "/root/ITEM/ITEM_PRODUCT_SKU", 0), 1), "Value"))      set @ITEMPRODUCTURL = Trim(Field(Row(BuildRowSetFromXML(@LOOPINGAPPENDIX, "/root/ITEM/ITEM_PRODUCT_URL", 0), 1), "Value"))      set @ITEMPRODUCTIMGURL = Trim(Field(Row(BuildRowSetFromXML(@LOOPINGAPPENDIX, "/root/ITEM/ITEM_PRODUCT_IMG_URL", 0), 1), "Value"))      set @ITEMQTY = Trim(Field(Row(BuildRowSetFromXML(@LOOPINGAPPENDIX, "/root/ITEM/ITEM_QTY", 0), 1), "Value"))      set @ITEMSUBSCRIPTIONPRICE = Trim(Field(Row(BuildRowSetFromXML(@LOOPINGAPPENDIX, "/root/ITEM/ITEM_SUBSCRIPTION_PRICE", 0), 1), "Value"))      set @ITEMTOTAL = Trim(Field(Row(BuildRowSetFromXML(@LOOPINGAPPENDIX, "/root/ITEM/ITEM_TOTAL", 0), 1), "Value"))      set @rowColor = Iif(Mod(@j,2) == 0, "#efefef", "#ffffff")   ]%%   %%[endif]%%   %%[next @j]%% Can we simulate the whole universe in computer? Here is an idea: As human kind we discovered many laws, formulas, events, etc. in our surrounding environment.here is a way to discover the unknowns :   Now if we simulate a virtual world with our knowledge in computers we expect it to work, because we guess that we know all of it. If a bug occurs in the simulation or something acts differently from the expected in the real world, that may tell us that there is something new; a thing (law, formula, ...) that we didn't know, which causes that bug or that anomaly.  For examples imagine that we created a virtual simulation for motion dynamics and we didn't add the friction to our simulation. Everything in the simulation will work fine but in a different manner. So if we hadn't discovered friction yet, would it help us to think about if there is something we didn't add? Or if there is something we don't know?       But can we simulate the whole universe, everything we know, in one simulation? I know it will require a deadly high computational power. Something like what they did for DNA; two years of computation to analyse their pattern. can we simulate everything we know to create a virtual universe to compare it to our real universe? When you use the allowframebreaks option in beamer then you get additional frames if the content is too high for one frame. The vertical spacing gets disturbed when you use a list (itemize, enumerate, description), for example, see the following animation. I used the t option (for top alignment) for the frame.     \documentclass[aspectratio=169]{beamer}   \begin{document}  \begin{frame}[t,allowframebreaks] \frametitle{Frame Title} \setlength{\mylength}{\baselineskip} \begin{itemize} \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \end{itemize}  \end{frame}  \begin{frame}[t,allowframebreaks] \frametitle{Frame Title}  Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\ Text\\  \end{frame}  \end{document}    I thought of a solution, when I read  question where they explain the different length in lists. The main idea is to check if the current frame is not the first frame of a frame continuation and add the needed vertical space. I thought that \topsep is the needed length but apparently, it is not quite right. It ist almost perfect but it still "dances" a little bit. Which additional length do I need? Here's the animation and the used code.     \documentclass[aspectratio=169]{beamer}  \setbeamertemplate{frametitle continuation}{%     (\insertcontinuationcount)%     \ifnum\insertcontinuationcount&gt;1%     \vspace*{\topsep}%     \else%     %     \fi% }  \begin{document}  \begin{frame}[t,allowframebreaks] \frametitle{Frame Title}  \begin{itemize} \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \item Test \end{itemize}  \end{frame}  \end{document}   Related        Definition of \itemize in beamer  In beamerbaselocalstructure.sty I found  \renewcommand{\itemize}[1][]{%   \beamer@ifempty{#1}{}{\def\beamer@defaultospec{#1}}%   \ifnum \@itemdepth &gt;2\relax\@toodeep\else     \advance\@itemdepth\@ne     \beamer@computepref\@itemdepth% sets \beameritemnestingprefix     \usebeamerfont{itemize/enumerate \beameritemnestingprefix body}%     \usebeamercolor[fg]{itemize/enumerate \beameritemnestingprefix body}%     \usebeamertemplate{itemize/enumerate \beameritemnestingprefix body begin}%     \list       {\usebeamertemplate{itemize \beameritemnestingprefix item}}       {\def\makelabel##1{%           {%             \hss\llap{{%                 \usebeamerfont*{itemize \beameritemnestingprefix item}%                 \usebeamercolor[fg]{itemize \beameritemnestingprefix item}##1}}%           }%         }%       }   \fi%   \beamer@cramped%   \raggedright%   \beamer@firstlineitemizeunskip% }   But I do not understand where the different kinds of spaces are defined that cause the "dancing".  "Evil" Stuff in beamer  Motivated by the comment of @cfr I searched the beamer documentation for "evil" stuff -- this is what I have found (beamer guide version 3.41):   Do not use subsubsections, they are evil. Never ever use the evil option shrink.  Using this [again shrink] option is very evil. The use of this [allowframebreaks] option is evil. Is "Don't do it" a valid answer? If someone asks how to do XYZ, and you think doing XYZ at all is a Bad Idea™, is it valid to post an answer saying so? You aren't answering the question, but instead, arguing the question's validity.  You could do this in a comment, but I don't think comments carry enough weight on occasion.  For example, I came across this today ; for those not wanting to link away:     I would like to build a wiki based website about professors, so that students can share information and check the reputation of the professor before working for him.   and I really wanted to post an answer that said, "I think this is a very bad idea". (In fact I did anyway, despite awareness that it could get myself flamed.)  Was I wrong? What should I have done instead? I have been wondering about the differences between model paramters and model hyperparameters, as well as what their categorization means for a learning problem.  Is the distinction between model parameters and hyperparameters only about reducing the complexity of the problem or are there implications for the 'model quality' to be considered?  Let's consider an example from (1, Eq. 2.43), a linear expansion of basis functions   $$f_\theta(x) = \sum_{m=1}^{M} \theta_m h_m(x), $$  where $h_m\:\forall m=1,...,M$ is some function of $x$, $\theta=[\theta_1,...,\theta_M]^\intercal$ is a vector of the parameters of the model and $M$ is the number of basis functions.   In my understanding, we would consider $\theta$ to contain the parameters of the model, while $M$ is a .  To quote the Wikipedia article of hyperparameter that I linked above:     In machine learning, a hyperparameter is a parameter whose value is   set before the learning process begins. By contrast, the values of   other parameters are derived via training.   It makes sense treating the values in $\theta$ as parameters that should be learned from the data, similar to the coefficients in a linear model - it is surely far more reliable  and  specifying them manually would be quite annoying, although it's not impossible. But what about $M$? It surely is easier to pick some integer value for it. But would it really be terrible to determine $M$ based on the data, too? Probably not, as that is what we would do if we search a grid of possible values for the best performing one.   Let's consider the above basis expansion model and choose Gaussian kernel functions to serve as basis functions. As the Kernel itself has parameters too  this makes the problem a bit more complicated.  $$f_\theta(x) = \sum_{m=1}^{M}\theta_m K_{\lambda_m}(\mu_m,x), $$ with $\mu_1,...,\mu_m$ being the location of the kernels and $\lambda_1,...,\lambda_m$ their scales/bandwidths.  Friedman et al. write in (1, p. 36)        "In general we would like the data to dictate them as well. Including   these as parameters changes the regression problem from a   straightforward linear problem to a combinatorially hard nonlinear   problem. In practice, shortcuts such as greedy algorithms or two stage processes are used."   I see that if we were to treat $M$, $\theta_1 ... \theta_M$, $\mu_1 ... \mu_M$ and $\lambda_1 ... \lambda_M$, as model parameters, this problem would be really complex, especially with the choice of $M$ determining the number of the other parameters. But what if we simplify the model definition - let us for example use the same scale/bandwidth for each kernel, that gives us only one parameter $\lambda$. Furthermore, let's say we specify $\mu_1 ... \mu_M$ based on some heuristic, which would mean we treat it as a hyperparameter.  This gives us   $$f_{\theta,\lambda}(x) = \sum_{m=1}^{M}\theta_m K_\lambda(\mu_m,x), $$  Besides increased complexity of the involved optimization problem, does treating $\lambda$ as a parameter rather than a hyperparameter have other negative or undesired effects?      (1) Friedman, Jerome, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. The   elements of statistical learning. Vol. 1. No. 10. New York: Springer   series in statistics, 2001. Why is scale factor inversely proprotional to temperature? In all lectures, books and papers I have read about, the scale factor of the universe is inversely proportional to temperature  $$a \propto \frac{1}{T}$$  What is the reasoning behind this relation?  People did mention stretching of wavelength proportional to scale factor and wavelength being inversely proportional to temperature by Wein's law, but somehow this argument doesn't seem convincing to me. How did we initially come about to this relation? Exporting feature class into multiple feature classes based on field values using ArcGIS Desktop? I have a feature class with over 2,000 features, and I need to make them all individual feature classes based on a field.   Is there a way to do this? How to get Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 work on Ubuntu 16.04? I searched many solutions on this site but most of them were referring to Broadcom Wifi drivers while mine has Intel one.   Output of lspci -knn | grep Net -A2  arijit@HP-AU134TX:~$ lspci -knn | grep Net -A2  05:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:24fb] (rev 10) DeviceName: Intel Dual BandWireless-AC 3168 802.11 ac 1x1 WiFi + BT 4.0 Combo Adapter Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2110]   Output of rfkill list  arijit@HP-AU134TX:~$ rfkill list  arijit@HP-AU134TX:~$    i.e No Output  Output of uname -a; dmesg | grep iwl  arijit@HP-AU134TX:~$ uname -a; dmesg | grep iwl  Linux HP-AU134TX 4.4.0-31-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 13 00:07:12 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Prove $\left| \int_a^b f(t) dt \right| \leq \int_a^b \left| f(t) \right| dt$ I've been given a proof that shows the following:  If $f:[a,b]\to \mathbb C$ is a continuous function and $f(t)=u(t)+iv(t)$ then $$\left| \int_a^b f(t) dt \right| \leq \int_a^b \left| f(t) \right| dt$$ The proof begins by letting $\theta$ be the principle argument of the complex number $\int_a^b f(t)dt$ and there is one step in the proof I don't understand; can anyone explain to me why $$\int_a^b e^{-i\theta}f(t) dt=\Re\bigg(\int_a^be^{-i\theta}f(t)dt\bigg)$$  Would this not imply that the imaginary part of the left hand side is equal to $0$? I'm not sure why the LHS and RHS would be equal here.