Look at this image:    That was on the  site. I have the ability to approve suggested edits that are proposed. This number sits at 4. However, whenever I click the lovely button, it leads me to an empty queue.    Thinking that someone else may have reviewed them (and it must've been at a really nifty speed), I decided to let it go. However, the number won't go back. Instead, it goes up.  Could there be something wrong with this?
When I went to the review overview on Meta on 08.01.2015, 19:16, it listed two open items in the suggested-edits queue, however when I clicked on the queue, I was told that the queue had been cleared. When I went back to the review overview, however, the edits were there again.  Since the icons for recent reviews had not moved, I suppose that these were still the same two items waiting for review, and since phenomenon lasted for half an hour now, I would rule out  or  to be the reason for this.  After a while, the phenomenon ceased, with one new reviewer popping up in the icon list of recent reviewers.  I had not performed or skipped any suggested-edit review from the queue at that point.    A similar phenomenon occurred for several hours up to 11.04.2015, 11:05: The review overview showed two suggested edits and when I went to the suggested-edits queue, it was cleared. Sometimes, edits that I could review appeared, but two phantom edits remained.
Suppressing addition of blank page before figure when wrapping long JPEG image I have the following LaTeX file, whose sole purpose is to wrap a JPEG file. This file does not convert well to PDF, so I'm using this unorthodox technique to convert it.  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx} \pagenumbering{gobble} \begin{document}  \centering\includegraphics[height=650pt]{foo.jpg} \end{document}   This produces a PDF file including the document, but it first includes a blank page, and thus produces a 2 page document, rather than a 1 page document. How do I get rid of this blank page? Using \textheight instead of 650pt as an argument to \includegraphicsmakes the  problem go away, but I'd prefer the larger size I get from using 650pt.  Here is the relevant information from the log file.  &lt;foo.jpg, id=1, 162.6075pt x 1165.35374pt&gt; File: foo.jpg Graphic file (type jpg)  &lt;use foo.jpg&gt; Package pdftex.def Info: foo.jpg used on input line 14. (pdftex.def)             Requested size: 90.6998pt x 650.0pt.  [1  ] Overfull \vbox (100.0pt too high) has occurred while \output is active []   [2 &lt;./foo.jpg&gt;] (./foo.aux) )    I'd prefer to not make the actual document public. Therefore the code above is not a MWE. However, if anyone has tips on how to create a dummy JPEG of the same size, let me know. It's possible to define dependent picklist in the setup and the are supported out-of-the-box in Visualforce.  Are they also supported in Lightning natively? Is it on the roadmap to support them soon? If not: is there a best practice or a easily reusable workaround available right now? Why is it that we have to use the gerund form for the first example? I have been told that it is not grammatical to use the infinitive form.  For some verbs, it's okay:     I wanted to study English.   I had to study English.   I needed to study English.   I tried to study English.   I traveled to study English.   But, for some verbs, it's incorrect:     I ended up to study English.     Why is that the case? "The train will leave" vs. "is going to leave" vs. "leaves" vs. "is leaving" What is an SE "day"? When does each day start? When does a day start on the Stack Exchange network? Some badges (Enthusiast, , ) and voting limits are bound by and relate heavily to the concept of a day. Do days correspond to calendar days? What time zone is used?  Related Why does adding a DOCTYPE affect my CSS? Forgive the possibly naive question, but I'm returning to a basic undergrad-level study of chaotic dynamical systems and can't quite seem to reconcile the notion that in order for a dynamical system to be considered chaotic, it must have positive global Lyapunov exponents. Such exponents, of course, drive the divergence of trajectories. However, topological transitivity implies that trajectories can get arbitrarily close as well over some finite time. It seems that positive Lyapunov exponents would disallow this mixing. Is there a point at which these positive exponents no longer describe the system, and the mixing behavior begins? I'm trying to install bang and olufsen drivers, or HP hd audio driver, as only 2 of the 4 speakers work and the 2 amps don't work in ubuntu  lspci -v | grep -i audio 00:03.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Broadwell-U Audio Controller (rev 09)     Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Broadwell-U Audio Controller 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP High Definition Audio Controller (rev 03)     Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Wildcat Point-LP High Definition Audio Controller   The volume is terrible. Is there any way to fix this?  The speakers work perfectly on the pre-installed Windows 8. Undefined reference to vtable Local hyperlinks broken after PDF processing with Ghostscript I usually compress my tex PDFs with ghostscript:  pdflatex -shell-escape file.tex  gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite        \    -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4   \    -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress      \    -dNOPAUSE -dQUIET -dBATCH      \    -sOutputFile=file_compressed.pdf \     file.pdf   Normally that works well, but if I have relative links to local files, the links don't work afterwards.  Minimal example:  \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage{hyperref}  \begin{document}     \begin{frame}         \href{run:./audio.mp3}{test}     \end{frame} \end{document}   The link works in file.pdf but not in file_compressed.pdf. Is there any pdflatex or ghostscript setting that retains the link in the compressed version?  I use Acrobate Reader 10.1.14 for viewing, Ghostscript 9.10 and pdfTeX 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.15 (TeX Live 2014) on OS X 10.9.5.    Update: The breakage of hyperlinks had nothing to do with compressing the PDFs. The breakage happened for all re-processing of PDFs containing hyperlinks in its input PDF. ACPI wakeup 4-letters code meaning? I have to  to avoid an immediate wakeup after suspend in my desktop machine, and I made it by trial and error (works well, so that is not a problem). But I wonder...  for example in my laptop I have a long list in /proc/acpi/wakeup:  [...] RP03      S4    *disabled PXSX      S4    *disabled RP04      S4    *disabled  pci:0000:00:1c.3 PXSX      S4    *enabled   pci:0000:03:00.0 RP06      S4    *disabled [...]   I have searched around and I can't find a place where a list with the meaning of the 4-letter code in the first column is explained. I imagine that the events with a device name after them are linked/generated by that device, but I am at a loss with most of the rest... minus wild guesses.   How can I know what, for example, event RP06 is? Is there anywhere a list? Or are that codes vendor-specific? I saw this keyword for the first time and I was wondering if someone could explain to me what it does.   What is the continue keyword? How does it work? When is it used? Using Static Variables in a Custom Module I'm trying to define a static variable for use in my custom module. I want it to let me pass a number from function to function. I'm using drupal_static() but I can't get it to work. How do I do this?  This is the code I'm using to define my static variable.  $var = &amp;drupal_static(__FUNCTION__); if (!isset($var)) {   // generate contents of static variable   $var = '8'; } return $var;   I've tried putting it in a custom module.    function viewusercontact_locateuser($value, $key, &amp;$counter) {    global $user;     /**********In here***********/     if ($value['uid'] == $user-&gt;uid) {       ........    } }   I can't seem to get it to work. What am I doing wrong?  (I got my code from the following guides) In an hydrogen-like atoms the orbitals are solutions to the Schrodinger equation suitable for the problem.  They describe the regions where an electron can be found.  So, why don't they have spherical symmetric?  As in this picture:    Why, in a certain distance from the nucleus, are there points where an electron can be found, and points where it can't?  EDIT: Is there any intuation about the symmetry breaking? The Weyl equidistribution theorem states that the sequence of fractional parts ${n \xi}$, $n = 0, 1, 2, \dots$ is uniformly distributed for $\xi$ irrational.   This can be proved using a bit of ergodic theory, specifically the fact that an irrational rotation is uniquely ergodic with respect to Lebesgue measure. It can also be proved by simply playing with trigonometric polynomials (i.e., polynomials in $e^{2\pi i k x}$ for $k$ an integer) and using the fact they are dense in the space of all continuous functions with period 1.  In particular, one shows that if $f(x)$ is a continuous function with period 1, then for any $t$,  $\int_0^1 f(x) dx = \lim \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=0}^{N-1} f(t+i \xi)$. One shows this by checking this (directly) for trigonometric polynomials via the geometric series.  This is a very elementary and nice proof.  The general form of Weyl's theorem states that if $p$ is a monic integer-valued polynomial, then the sequence ${p(n \xi)}$ for $\xi$ irrational is uniformly distributed modulo 1.  I believe this can be proved using extensions of these ergodic theory techniques -- it's an exercise in Katok and Hasselblatt.  I'd like to see an elementary proof.  Can the general form of Weyl's theorem be proved using the same elementary techniques as in the basic version? Is there a built-in checksum utility on Windows 7? Is there a built-in checksum/hash utility on Windows 7? How do I help my third-grader focus on homework? My child just entered third grade, and the homework load is much higher this year, with a lot of writing and math drills. It is all work that she can do easily, but it's causing the whole family a lot of pain, because she's have a really hard time just sitting down and doing it — asking many questions about things she clearly actually knows, and getting distracted by the smallest thing going on around her. (Setting up a special quiet area isn't helping, because the distractions could be her pencil or a sudden burst of word association based on something in the lesson.)  So, a page of writing and a couple of pages of math which could be done in fifteen minutes total is taking an hour and a half. She can easily explain the reasoning behind the math problems, but when it comes to writing down what she just said, it's like pulling teeth. She'll slowly write a word, sounding it out in slow motion as she writes each word. And she'll say that she doesn't understand a question, but when she actually gets her mind pointed at it, she can write a great answer. And she's clearly picking up the concepts in class; I have no doubt that she actually understands, which is part of our frustration.  My wife feels like she's just wanting attention, but I think it's more about our daughter's own ability to focus. We both feel that sitting down and working painfully through each question isn't really helping her. That works, but my wife feels like it's just rewarding the behavior, and I feel like it's not really helping her learn any better focus on her own, which, you know, she'll need in actual life. And, we're happy to spend child with our kid, this pretty much the opposite of quality time.  Neither rewards or consequences seem to have any effect, and nor do charts. All of those things basically just seem to add another layer of complication, distraction, and misery. What else can we do? Looking at moving my laundry upstairs, and the right answer is to combine two adjacent closets to get the width and move one of their walls a foot or two into the kitchen to get the depth.  The kitchen floor is 10-inch-square tiles. It would be sort of nice if that continued on into the laundry closet. I do have a full bundle of spare tiles in the basement.   Question: Could/should I plan on the new wall coming in on top of the existing tiles (presumably having to drill to secure the footer without shattering them), or should I plan on removing the ones under the footer and fitting cut pieces back in afterward? Is there evidence that adding salt to water prior to boiling can damage a stainless steel pan? Why is it "come" rather than "go" ?