There should be a notification when a moderator reviews or looks at a post which you've flagged.  The notification could show the status (helpful, declined, disputed, or something else) of your flag.  Edit  The reason for doing this is so that you would be able to see when a post which you have flagged has received moderator attention, at which point you could go back to the post. This would be good, for instance, if:   you flagged a post for migration to another site; after migration occurs, you could answer the question, since  that only unanswered questions should get migrated you flagged a post for removal of spam or otherwise nonconstructive content, and the content removal has to be carried out in batches
Long story short: since custom flag responses are messages to users like any other (answer, comment, suggested edit, chat message etc.), users should be notified about them!!    A problem I have with flagging, as it currently functions, is that flaggers are not notified about custom responses to flags, when they are given. I really don't care if I don't find out about every last flag of mine, whether it was marked "helpful" or not, but if a moderator went to the effort of typing out a custom response to my flag, explaining why it was or was not helpful, I'd like to see that response. The logical place for this response would be in the messages inbox (the red number thingy in the top left corner), where other responses to user actions (like answers, comments, edits, and chat messages) go.  This may also help to alleviate  of users not realizing that their flags go somewhere -- while I agree with her that "We shouldn't send notifications for [all] flag responses; that would be way too noisy for a lot of people," I think that in the event of a custom response, the flagger should be notified (because some mod thought that this information was relevant to the flagger), and it would not be too noisy because (in my experience1) most flags do not receive a custom response. This could provide one way that flaggers can be made aware of their flagging history.2    1 I don't know who can see this, but  on Mi Yodeya, to date, is 55 flags total (49 helpful), and only one custom response (....that I didn't see for a while, till I checked my flagging history for a different reason).  2 While I don't think that this will replace Monica's suggestion entirely, it would certainly help it a little.    To give credit where credit is due, while I came up with this idea myself, I did notice that someone else had posted about a similar idea earlier in a .  Edit: Just spotted  from the related questions along the side of the page; note that while that proposal is similar to this one, it was about sending all declined flags to the inbox, while I suggested that only the ones with custom responses should make it to the inbox.
A problem with my reasoning in a problem about combinations Probability that all three shirts were worn Mr. Jones has three shirts: Red, Green and White. Each day he picks randomly a red shirt with probability of $\frac{1}{2}$, green with probability of $\frac{1}{3}$ and white with probability of $\frac{1}{6}$.     What is the probability that he wears all three shirts after 6 days?   My try:   $$\binom{6}{1}\binom{5}{1}\binom{4}{1}\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{1}{3}\cdot\frac{1}{6}\cdot[\binom{3}{2}(\frac{1}{2})^2\cdot[\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{6}]+[\binom{3}{2}(\frac{1}{3})^2\cdot[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{6}]+[\binom{3}{2}(\frac{1}{6})^2\cdot[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}]+\binom{3}{1}\binom{2}{1}\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{1}{3}\cdot\frac{1}{6}]$$  First, we pick possessions for red, green and white. Then, we multiply it by the other combinations possible of the other three possessions left, and summing it up (I didn't count all possibilities). The problem is the answer is bigger than 1, so it must be wrong. Also, I guess there is more elegant way.  Thanks in advance. I think the following is true:  If $q$ is coprime to $a$ then $a\mid (nq-1)$ for some $n\in\mathbb Z$.  I have started to first reducing $n\in\mathbb Z$ to $n\in\{1,\ldots,a-1\}$ and then considering all the cases $q = ka + j$ for $j=1,2,3,\ldots,a-1$. I stopped at $j=3$ and found that this is kinda messy. Does anyone have an elegant proof for this (maybe using some results from number theory)?  [Note: question has been generalized from prime $q\nmid a$ to $\,q$ coprime to $a$] I have multiple cameras in a scene. What I want to do is to change which one is active. This way I can view the scene from different angles. How would I do this? How to check if my eSATAp port provides 12V power? I have a Lenovo ThinkPad Edge 13" model 0217-2QG with eSATAp port.  How do i check if my port provides 12V power (enough to power a 3.5" HDD)? Determining relationship (e.g. number of removes) with cousin? How do I figure out if someone is a first cousin, second cousin, cousin once-removed, etc? MWE:  \documentclass{article} \begin{document} $\wedge{\small\wedge}{\tiny\wedge}$ \end{document}   All the \wedges have the same size... Find examples of two series $\sum a_n$ and $\sum b_n$ both of which diverge but for which $\sum \min(a_n, b_n)$ converges. To make it more challenging, produce examples where $a_n$ and $b_n$ are positive and decreasing.  Edit: This problem is taken verbatim from Exercise 2.7.11 on page 68 of Abbott's Understanding analysis. Importance of PTR records on nameserver IP's? I have not yet experienced any DNS failures due to a missing PTR record, but am wondering:   Is there any added value in having a valid PTR record on a nameserver IP-address? Vim-latex adds extra brackets when typing empty brackets Show timestamp of a vote in the tooltip when mousing over it Sometimes I come across an old question or answer that I voted on in the past, but I don't clearly remember when (or sometimes even why) I voted it up or down. Being able to see the date/time that I cast a vote would help me remember my mindset at the time.   When mousing over the toggled vote, the tooltip reads the same as if I hadn't voted, with no further information. For example:     This answer is useful (click again to undo)   The only way to get the timestamp is if I try to click the vote to undo it and get the locked vote message:     You last voted on this answer [datetime] Your vote is now locked in unless this answer is edited   However this requires me to guess that the vote is locked - if there was an edit since then I'll actually undo the vote and erase the info I was looking for.  Feature request: Please add the vote timestamp to the tooltip when mousing over a cast vote. This is already done with the green acceptance checkmark for example. How can I visualize the file system usage on Windows? Prove that $ AB$ is a subgroup of order $mn$ if $m$ and $n$ are relatively prime. What should I look for when shopping for my first DSLR? I am thinking of buying a digital SLR camera. What things should I be looking for? How is the system call in Linux implemented? When I invoke a system call in user mode,how did the call get processed in OS?  Does it invoke some some executable binary or some standard library?  If yes,what kind of thing it needs to complete the call? I was wondering if there was any was I could right click inside any instance of a "Finder" window such that I have an option that says "Open Terminal Here". It would be really helpful. How to write (La)TeX (with parentheses) [or any other TeX-related logo] $\require{enclose}\enclose{horizontalstrike}{\rm Greatest}\!$ Least prime factor of $n$ is less than square root of $n$, proof I remember reading this somewhere but I cannot locate the proof. Many times I see that URL extensions are hidden (e.g. .html, .php), but not all websites do this.  Why do webmasters hide the extension? Is it for security, for the URL to look cleaner, or for some other purpose? algebraic element over a field Let $F$ be a subfield of a field $K$, $a$ an element of $K$.  Prove that $a$ is algebraic over $F$ iff $F[a]=F(a)$.  For the first direction I've tried this: $a$ is algebraic over $F$ $\Rightarrow$ there is a polynomail $f$ over $F$ such that $f(a)=0$ $\Rightarrow$ $1,a,a^2,...,a^m$ are linearly dependent $\Rightarrow$ $\deg(F[a])&lt;m$.    but it contains $f(a)$ so they are equal..  is that correct? about the other direction.. i simply have no clue