I want to install php7.4-soap on my Ubuntu 20.04 machine, so I ran sudo apt-get install php7.4-soap But I get following error: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation:  The following packages have unmet dependencies:  php7.4-soap : Depends: php7.4-common (= 7.4.3-4ubuntu1) but 7.4.5-1+ubuntu19.10.1+deb.sury.org+1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.  How can I deal with this error?
After upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04 I am trying to install different packages.  For instance ia32-libs and skype (4.0).  When trying to install these, I am getting the 'Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages' error message.   Output of commands:  sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.   After running this:  sudo dpkg --configure -a foo@foo:~$ sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
What's the difference between cards, panels, and tiles? It seems as if with some of the modern front-end development frameworks there is a blur between the different types of 'container' elements. Whether this is an attempt to abstract the design from implementation or if this is due to there not being any standardization of terminologies I am not sure, but it leads to the fact that in some design frameworks I see the term panels being used but not cards (e.g. Bootstrap 3) while in others the term cards exists but not panels (e.g. Iconic), and perhaps both exist in others?  From a design perspective, it seems that both cards and panels are just containers, and since there's nothing that defines how big a card can get and how small a panel can be, I am wondering whether there's really any difference. From an implementation perspective, it seems that cards should be used for smaller size design elements and are preferred on mobile specific applications, whereas panels are used for a wider range of design elements and are preferred on desktop specific applications.  Is there any evidence/reference/examples that will help to illustrate or highlight the (lack of) differences? For some reason I think cards and tiles are more closely related to each other, and that panels seem to be in a slightly different class/family?  If we take the argument that there are no differences, then it is hard to understand why people associate 'tiles' with Microsoft 'Metro' style home pages, while on Google and Android apps it is 'cards' and for Java and Gnome applications it is 'panels'. Perhaps there are some contextual or implementation differences?  UPDATE: with the release of Bootstrap 4, it seems like cards are basically equivalent to panels (since one component has replaced the other), but with this comes the cost of having to maintain a more flexible container that will make it difficult to implement consistently. According to Bootstrap:      A flexible and extensible content container. It includes options for   headers and footers, a wide variety of content, contextual background   colors, and powerful display options.   FURTHER UPDATE: It seems as if Bootstrap 5 and Material.io have adopted the card UI component in the new world of responsive and mobile first/multi-device ecosystem design systems while "tiles" have a very specific meaning in the Microsoft Fluent Design System:      A tile is an app's representation on the Start menu. Every app has a tile. When you create a new Universal Windows Platform (UWP) app project in Microsoft Visual Studio, it includes a default tile that displays your app's name and logo   Panels don't seem to be part of the vocabulary anymore, as least in terms of a UI component, but in the Microsoft and Java world it still represents an abstract concept of organisation layouts of UI components. Proving the convergence of $\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{1+z^n}$ for $|z| > 1$ addtocontents not working with certain other packages This is a follow up question on   How do I change the toc dept mid document while using packages (in this case only mathtools).  An example:  \documentclass[a4paper,10pt,oneside]{book}  \usepackage{mathtools}  \begin{document}   \frontmatter             \chapter{hello}  \section{hello}  \subsection{hello}  \subsubsection{hello}   \setcounter{tocdepth}{3}  \tableofcontents   \mainmatter   \chapter{hello}  \section{hello}  \subsection{hello}  \subsubsection{hello}   \chapter{hello}  \section{hello}  \subsection{hello}  \subsubsection{hello}   \appendix   \addtocontents{toc}{\setcounter{tocdepth}{0}}   \chapter{hello}  \section{hello}  \subsection{hello}  \subsubsection{hello}   \chapter{hello}  \section{hello}  \subsection{hello}  \subsubsection{hello}  \end{document}   This example generates an error and very strangely puts an exclamation mark in the ToC as you can see here   however when I comment out the \usepackage{mathtools} it suddenly works again or replacing it with a different package such as \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} also generates no errors.  But this is not limited to just this specific package, certain other packages also introduce the same behavior (I just took this package to keep the example small). When I create a new Date object, it is initialized to the current time but in the local timezone. How can I get the current date and time in GMT? Combining Multiple Lists How to make a grid-to-sphere animation like this? List or IList How to return a part of an array in Ruby? How to get world-space matrix of any pose bone? Is there a command for getting world-space matrix of pose bones, same as obj.matrix_world for objects? I found pose_bone.matrix, but it gives weird result for me. This question and answer is a response to a request from Joseph Wright.   Why shouldn't I use getnonfreefonts to install additional fonts? Why shouldn't I use updmap when installing or removing fonts?     Background  There are a number of questions on the site concerning problems caused by people installing additional fonts and using updmap to update the 'map' files on which TeX depends.  One common cause of these problems is the use of getnonfreefonts.  Other causes are the use of other font installation scripts or executing updmap directly. Do iOS app visits count to your consecutive visits How does one know when to use a gerund or an infinitive? Limit of $\cos(x)/x$ as $x$ approaches $0$ As the title says, I want to show that the limit of  $$\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\cos(x)}{x}$$  doesn't exist.  Now for that I'd like to show in a formally correct way that   $$\lim_{x\to 0^+} \frac{\cos(x)}{x} = +\infty$$  I'm sure this is right since $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+} \cos(x) = 1$ and $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+} x = 0$, but since $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+} x = 0$ I can't just say:  $$\lim_{x\to 0^+} \frac{\cos(x)}{x} = \frac{1}{\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+} x}$$   Things I tried: expand the fraction and use L'Hospital's rule (This didn't seem to yield results even though I tried quite a few things, should it? If it does, should it always work? It worked for similar problems) and going by the definition of the limit which didn't work for me either.  I'm grateful for any hints for doing this problem and similar problems especially. I have got hundreds images of products with clear white backgrounds. I would like to change the white background color to become transparent.   Is there a means of batch processing this particular process with Photoshop or any other applications? What counter balances gravity here? Lets consider a stone tied to one end of a massless and unstretchable string... Now if i'll start rotating, it will form a conical pendulum &amp; then the equilibrium is achived when the pendulum attains horizontal circular motion.... Now to maintain that state we give a constant force to string.... Here, which force counterbalances gravity? Is it the torque due to applied force cancels out the torque due to gravity?  The angle θ changes from 0 to 90° If I have example.com, and blog.example.com, do search engines see those as one site or two? Will using subdomains hurt SEO? I have some technical reasons why I can't use example.com/blog. Usually I don't mind about LaTeX's compilation speed, because a paper of less than 20 pages is compiled rather fast.  However, I am working on a large document - A report with more than 80 pages.  Compilation times are starting to slow me down.  I saw the couple of answers here on this topic, but most of my graphics are external and I don't use Tikz.  As a matter of fact, I'm not sure what's slowing the compilation down, other than the amount of text and required layout.   What's your best speeding-tex-up trick, other than externalizing graphics and pre-compiling the preamble? How can I know what's slowing TeX down? As the title say, I want to prove that  $C_c^{\infty}(\mathbb R^n)$ is dense in $W^{k,p}(\mathbb R^n)$  i.e.  $\displaystyle{ W^{k,p} (\mathbb R^n) = W_0^{k,p}(\mathbb R^n)  \quad (\star)}$. In a book I found that in order to prove it, we need the following claim:  Claim: Let $\displaystyle{\zeta \in C^{\infty} ([0, \infty)) }$ such that $\zeta (t)  =1 $ for $ t \leq 1 $ and $\displaystyle{ \zeta (t) =0 }$ for $ t \geq 2$. For $R&gt;0$ and  $x \in \mathbb R^n$ define $\displaystyle{ \eta_R (x) = \zeta \left( \frac{|x|}{R} \right)}$. If $ \displaystyle{ u \in W^{k,p} ( \mathbb R^n) }$ with $1 \leq p &lt; \infty $ then, $\displaystyle{ \eta_R u \to u }$ in $W^{k,p}(\mathbb R^n) $ as $ R \to \infty$.  If I prove the claim then the $(\star)$ follows using mollifiers. But unfortuently I have stuck, with the proof of the claim.  Any ideas? What characters/symbols are allowed within the CSS class selectors? I know that the following characters are invalid, but what characters are valid?  ~ ! @ $ % ^ &amp; * ( ) + = , . / ' ; : " ? &gt; &lt; [ ] \ { } | ` # Here is my bibliography in latex. The types is "Inprooceedings".  I use WinEdt.    @INPROCEEDINGS{tem_1,   Author         = {Comelli, P, Ferragina, P, Granieri, M.N, and Stabile, F},   Title          = {Optical recognition of motor vehicle license plates},   Year           = {1995},   Volume         = {44},   Series         = {4),   Month          = {November},   Pages          = {790–799},   Publisher      = {Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions}    }   But i get this error.   How to solve it?