Reverse proxy FTP traffic to Docker containers based on hostaname? Is there any way to reverse proxy FTP (or SFTP) connections as you can do with HTTP traffic? I already have working setup fot HTTP connections with  and I was wondering if I can route the FTP connections in similar way:  User connects ftp.domain1.com --&gt; FTP proxy --&gt; container1 (with -e HOST=ftp.domain1.com) User connects ftp.domain2.com --&gt; FTP proxy --&gt; container2 (with -e HOST=ftp.domain2.com)   And both of the containers are running in the same machine and have the same IP address.
How do I make protocol foo hostname-aware? This is a  about hostname-awareness and proxying.   I know that some protocols are hostname-aware; that is, when I connect to the HTTP server at www.example.com it knows I want www.example.com's HTTP service, not www.example.net's, even though they are on the same IP address.  How can I do this for protocol foo?  (Temporary note: this question appears pursuant to .)
center align equation in ‎\documentclass[11pt,twoside,fleqn]{book}‎ Find a non-negative function on [0,1] such that $t\cdot m(\{x:f(x) \geq t\}) \to 0$ that is not Lebesgue Integrable Can I nohup/screen an already-started process? I'm doing some test-runs of long-running data migration scripts, over SSH. Let's say I start running a script around 4 PM; now, 6 PM rolls around, and I'm cursing myself for not doing this all in screen.  Is there any way to "retroactively" nohup a process, or do I need to leave my computer online all night? If it's not possible to attach screen to/nohup a process I've already started, then why? Something to do with how parent/child proceses interact? (I won't accept a "no" answer that doesn't at least address the question of 'why' -- sorry ;) ) How to evaluate the integral $$\int_{25\pi / 4}^{53\pi / 4}\frac{1}{(1+2^{\sin x})(1+2^{\cos x})}dx\ ?$$ Why does the natural ring homomorphism induce a surjective group homomorphism of units? I'm trying an old problem here:   Suppose $n\mid m$, and I have a natural ring homomorphism $\varphi\colon \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ defined by $\varphi(j)=j\mod{n}$. I can verify that this is a ring homomorphism, but why does it induce a surjective group homomorphism on the unit groups $(\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z})^\times\to(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^\times$?  My question in particular is why is it surjective? I take $k\in(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^\times$. Then there exist integers $s,t$ such that $sn+tk=1$. Since $n\mid m$, I can also write $m=na$. So multiplying through I get $sm+tka=a$. I'm lost here. How can I find a unit in $(\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z})^\times$ which maps to $k$ to show surjectivity? I may have missed it with the 3D, but I could have sworn I saw what I suspect was a lady Dwarf or two running from the Erebor in the beginning of the Hobbit, but they didn't seem bearded.    If dwarf women aren't bearded, then was Aragorn just kidding in the Two Towers (movie) when he intimated that they all had beards?    It's also stated by Tolkien in appendix A to The Lord of the Rings that female dwarves appear identical to males and we can assume they are also born with beards, just like their male counterparts. Meaning of "stackexchange" What does stackexchange mean? I have checked out this  to read about the Stack Exchange Network. Affiliation for a retiree This question is similar to   and  except that I am a retiree.  I intend to submit a paper to a journal without mentioning any affiliation because I am no longer employeed. I have been thinking about a footnote in the paper indicating I am a retiree from my former employer for two reasons: I am receiving pension from the company pension fund and it is a well-known company in U.S. Using their name may make me look good. On the other hand, I feel like it's cheating because I am not their employee anymore. As I have heard people did not trust Euler when he first discovered the formula (solution of the ) $$\zeta(2)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{6}.$$ However, Euler was Euler and he gave other proofs.   I believe many of you know some nice proofs of this, can you please share it with us? proving logical equivalence $(P \leftrightarrow Q) \equiv (P \wedge Q) \vee (\neg P \wedge \neg Q)$ I am currently working through Velleman's book How To Prove It and was asked to prove the following  $(P \leftrightarrow Q) \equiv (P \wedge Q) \vee (\neg P \wedge \neg Q)$  This is my work thus far  $(P \to Q) \wedge (Q \to P)$  $(\neg P \vee Q) \wedge (\neg Q \vee P)$ (since $(P \to Q) \equiv (\neg P \vee Q)$)  $\neg[\neg(\neg P \vee Q) \vee \neg (\neg Q \vee P)]$ (Demorgan's Law)  $\neg [(P \wedge \neg Q) \vee (Q \wedge \neg P)]$ (Demorgan's Law)  At this point I am little unsure how to proceed.   Here are a few things I've tried or considered thus far:  I thought that I could perhaps switch some of the terms in step 3 using the law of associativity however the $\neg$ on the outside of the two terms prevents me from doing so (constructing a truth table for $\neg (\neg P \vee Q) \vee (\neg Q \vee P)$ and $\neg (\neg P \vee \neg Q) \vee \neg (P \vee Q)$ for sanity purposes)  I can't seem to apply the law of distribution since the corresponding terms are negated.  Applying demorgans law to one of the terms individually on step 2 or 3 doesnt seem to get me very far either.  Did I perhaps skip something? Am I even on the right track? Any help is appreciated to Global Variables inside functions Taylor expansion for $\arcsin^2{x}$ I stumbled upon this particular expansion that was included in  post.    $$ \displaystyle \arcsin^{2}(x) = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^{2} \binom{2n}{n}} (2x)^{2n}$$    This caught my eye because I remember trying to derive a Taylor series for $\arcsin^{2}(x)$ a while ago without much success.  Can anyone prove this or point me to a material that would show a proof of this identity?  EDIT :  Feel free to use any mathematical apparatus at hand. I'm not interested in a proof fit for a certain level, nor am I looking for utmost elegance (though that would be lovely). When is it ok to remove the intercept in a linear regression model? Why are the longer edges being beveled more? I'll preface this by saying I'm very new to Blender - I'm trying to put a bevel on an edge, looks something like this:    As you can see, the vertical side is much longer than the horizontal side.  When I apply to bevel to the edge there, the bevel stretches proportionally - so there's 'more' bevel on the longer side.  I want to bevel without any 'ratio' like that - just a 45-degree bevel, if that makes any sense.  Do I have to put in a loop cut to make the side lengths equal?  I tried using a sub-surf modifier, but it applies on a bunch of nearby edges, when I just want to round this one corner. How can I evaluate $\sum_{n=0}^\infty(n+1)x^n$? How can I evaluate $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{2n}{3^{n+1}}$$? I know the answer thanks to , but I'm more concerned with how I can derive that answer. It cites tests to prove that it is convergent, but my class has never learned these before. So I feel that there must be a simpler method.  In general, how can I evaluate $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)x^n?$$ Why can mathematical equations describe this world? Since I want to understand the world, I learn physics from textbooks. But I feel there is a gap between the textbook and the world. I do not know     why the equations in the textbook can control the whole world? How can I bridge the gap? In research, how can one distinguish whether what we do is meaningful in reality or not?   Any help or suggestions or comments will be appreciated. Multiple SSL domains on the same IP address and same port? This is a  about Hosting multiple SSL websites on the same IP.   I was under the impression that each SSL Certificate required it's own unique IP Address/Port combination. But the  is at odds with this claim.  Using information from that Question, I was able to get multiple SSL certificates to work on the same IP address and on port 443. I am very confused as to why this works given the assumption above and reinforced by others that each SSL domain website on the same server requires its own IP/Port.  I am suspicious that I did something wrong.  Can multiple SSL Certificates be used this way? Why do corticosteroids harm COVID-19 patients? states that steroids could do more harm than good in treating coronavirus (COVID-19), referring to .      Understanding the evidence for harm or benefit from corticosteroids in   2019-nCoV is of immediate clinical importance.   It's unclear to me how exactly the use of corticosteroids (which is a common treatments for Asthma patients) can do harm other than the vague explanation of "steroids also impair the immune system's ability to fight viruses".   How exactly does the use of steroids harm the body in case of fighting a virus such as SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV) that causes COVID-19? How do I parse a string to a float or int? Migrated questions with a nonexistent author should still show the author's name in the questions list I just noticed . Its author doesn't have an account on this site, which makes it show up like this on the homepage:        It looks like a simple thing - but it gets in the way of the 'flow' of the page:        Couldn't we somehow get the author's name, so that migrated questions with authors that don't have an account here still show up, like this:        Much better. Please?