I'm unsure when a subject is considered plural, and when not.  Especially here:     Williams aim to win at the next race.   Here, Williams is a team, and I have always through this is considered plural, but I'm seeing different uses all over the place. What's the rule there?
I'd say Microsoft have a way of bending the rules and I know that McLaren have won the championship. While this sounds strange, I believe it is correct English (sorry, I'm not native).   But when it's a small company, would you still use it this way? Is a company always plural, or are small companies singular? I.e., would you say Bakery Johnson makes fine bread or Bakery Johnson make fine bread? Is it My book seller, Woody's, have moved or is it has moved?
I have a wireless Access point which is connected to internet and the same being accessing by 2 system, one on windows XP and the other on Ubuntu.  Please let me know if it is possible to access the c:\ d:\ or any drives on windows xp machine directly from ubuntu system ?  I have tried doing this with 2 windows xp system but not sure how to do this from ubuntu.  Any help regarding the same is highly appreciated. (reason to do so is to access files in windows xp machine)  -Thanks &amp; regards, Manju If object A is moving at velocity $v$ (normalized so that $c=1$) relative to a ground observer emits object B at velocity $w$ relative to A, the velocity of B relative to the ground observer is  $$ v \oplus w = \frac{v+w}{1+vw} $$  As expected, $v \oplus 1 = 1$,  as "nothing can go faster than light".  Similarly, $v \oplus -1 = -1$. (same thing in the other direction)  But what if object A is moving at the speed of light and emits object B at the speed of light in the exact opposite direction? In other words, what is the value of $$1 \oplus -1?$$ Putting the values in the formula yields the indeterminate form $\frac{0}{0}$. This invites making sense of things by taking a limit, but $$ \lim_{(v,w)\to (1,-1)} \frac{v+w}{1+vw}$$ is not well-defined, because the limit depends on the path taken.  So what would the ground observer see? Is this even a meaningful question?  Edit: I understand $1 \oplus -1$ doesn't make sense mathematically (thought I made it clear above!), I'm asking what would happen physically. I'm getting the sense that my fears were correct, it's physically a nonsensical situation. Buffering in meters/km using WGS84 layers using QGIS I am using QGIS 1.7.4-Wroclaw and working with an SHP layer in WGS84. I want to buffer out to a certain number of kilometers from this layer using the ftools buffer tool.  I understand that the buffer tool always uses the layer units, which for WGS84 are decimal degrees. We all know that degrees don't convert consistently to meters, so how should I go about making my buffers?   Is it necessary for me to convert the shapefiles to a different CRS that natively uses meters?   If so, how do I choose one? Distance between points along polyline ArcGIS for Desktop? I'm using ArcGIS 10.3 (Desktop), and I'm trying to measure the distance between points following a path determined by a set of polylines.  Hand measurement is not a viable option-- there are ~7500 points, and my polyline set is the global coastline.  The ultimate goal is to get the spacing of these points along the polylines, so that I can analyze this with respect to a few other variables.   I can read python-- with a bit of effort-- but not write or edit it, so code-based solutions will not be particularly useful to me.  I have tried using the linear referencing tools-- I snapped the points to the lines, then transformed the polylines to routes and used 'locate features'-- but because my points are not (entirely) ordered along the path, using the difference between  linear reference locations of subsequent points yields some fairly unlikely answers.  In addition, spot checks of (hand-measured, using the built-in path length measuring tool) point-to-point along-polyline distance yield different answers than given by the corresponding linear references for the point pair. (Some of the answers were close enough that they could very well be measurement error on my part, but others were nearly 20%, despite my having zoomed in and snapped the measurement cursor to the polyline, proceeding vertex-to-vertex.)  Sorting first by linear distance seems to fix the first problem, but in light of the second one, I remain skeptical of this process.   I then tried simply splitting the polylines into segments ('split line at point') using the (snapped) points as the dividers, with the eventual goal of finding the segment length with the calculate geometry feature.  This produced gibberish. I'm not sure what criteria ArcGIS used to split the lines, but it wasn't the point set I provided.  Segments in the resulting shapefile ran right through tens of points, only to terminate at a place with no point. (Also, there were segments utterly empty of points...you get the gist.) I reiterate that the pointset was specifically snapped to the polylines, so this problem shouldn't be caused by excessive distance between the point and the polyline.  I'm at a bit of a loss, here: could someone point out where I might have gone astray and/or suggest a solution?  Or, failing that, a new method that I could try?  It seems like a fairly basic (not necessarily simple, but fundamental) analysis to do with geographic data, and I don't understand why it has presented so many difficulties. It looks like if I load dynamic content using $.get(), the result is cached in browser.  Adding some random string in QueryString seems to solve this issue (I use new Date().toString()), but this feels like a hack.   Is there any other way to achieve this? Or, if unique string is the only way to achieve this, any suggestions other than new Date()? Biblatex 3.3 name formatting I would like to create a custom format for citing authors' names in the text, let's call it "newformat". One option I can think of is creating a new bibmacro for names where the parameters are changed to my liking, such as   \documentclass{article}    \usepackage{filecontents}   \usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}[2016/01/01] %the latest version of biblatex?   % biber is version 2.4; the latest?  \begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @misc{Doe12,   author = {Doe, John},   year = {2012},   title = {A macro for formatting names}, } \end{filecontents}  \addbibresource{\jobname.bib} \nocite{*}  \newbibmacro{name:newformat}{\printnames{authors}} \DeclareNameFormat{newformat}{%   \usebibmacro{name:newformat}{\textbf{#1}}{\textbf{#3}}{#5}{#7}%   \usebibmacro{name:andothers}% }  \begin{document}    \section*{Testing the format here}    I am citing   \citename{Doe12}[newformat]{author}    \printbibliography % to make sure that the .bib file is properly formated.  \end{document}   Here, I just used \textbf for the sake of the example, but I ultimately want to use other functions, say upper case or palindrome!  However, I get this weird error message:  ! Illegal parameter number in definition of \blx@defformat@d. &lt;to be read again&gt;                     3 l.20   \usebibmacro{name:last}{#1}{#3                                      }{#5}{#7}%   which seems to indicate that the second option {#3} is not expected. I am a bit at a lost here; I checked the biblatex package and \usebibmacro{name:last} must be given 4 parameters, isn't it? Please advise. This is a follow-up question to , and is somehow related to   However, my question does not concern the reviews I receive for the papers I submit, but concerns the reviews I write for papers I have been assigned. Since the whole process is done under confidentiality, it is not clear who owns the copyright on a review I wrote, and what does the review include.   For instance, let us assume that X is member of a PC of a conference Y, and assigns to me a review of a paper Z, written by A and B (assuming it's not a double-blind). Can I publish on my blog: "Here is my review for Y, asked by X, on the paper Z, written by A and B"?   I think that there are two points here:    Is it legal? (for instance, publishing the camera-ready version of a paper might be illegal due to the copyright transfer, would it be also the care here?).  Is it ethical? (who should I ask in order to do so? X? Y? A and B? everybody?).    EDIT: There is been several comments/answer wondering why I would like to publish a review I wrote. To give a bit of background of this question, I believe that the current reviewing system, created when the academic community was small and there was no Internet (i.e. no easy access to information), might not be the best, although clearly working. This is for me a very interesting debate, but somehow out of the scope the Q&amp;A format of Academia SE, which is why I tried to focus on my question on whether it was possible to do so, not if it was the best thing to do in the current system (and just to be clear, I don't plan to do it, but I just like to know what are my options). Anyway, thanks for the answers bringing a different light on this debate.   EDIT 2: After seeing the update in Jeff's answer, I just realised that I didn't make it explicit that I was talking about reviews after the reviewing process. Jeff says that it's ok if the paper is accepted, and although I clearly understand the argument of why I shouldn't publish a review of a rejected paper, the question still holds: by publishing a review of a rejected paper, I publish the information that these authors submitted this paper to this conf/journal, which is supposed to be confidential between the authors and the editors. Would I break any rule by doing so? Lesser-known integration tricks I am currently studying for the GRE math subject test, which heavily tests calculus. I've reviewed most of the basic calculus techniques (integration by parts, trig substitutions, etc.) I am now looking for a list or reference for some lesser-known tricks or clever substitutions that are useful in integration. For example, I learned of this trick   $$\int_a^b f(x) \, dx = \int_a^b f(a + b -x) \, dx$$  in the question    I am especially interested in tricks that can be used without an excessive amount of computation, as I believe (or hope?) that these will be what  is useful for the GRE. It seems that through various related questions here, there is consensus that the "95%" part of what we call a "95% confidence interval" refers to the fact that if we were to exactly replicate our sampling and CI-computation procedures  many times, 95% of thusly computed CIs would contain the population mean. It also seems to be the consensus that this definition does not permit one to conclude from a single 95%CI that there is a 95% chance that the mean falls somewhere within the CI. However, I don't understand how the former doesn't imply the latter insofar as, having imagined many CIs 95% of which contain the population mean, shouldn't our uncertainty (with regards to whether our actually-computed CI contains the population mean or not) force us to use the base-rate of the imagined cases (95%) as our estimate of the probability that our actual case contains the CI?   I've seen posts argue along the lines of "the actually-computed CI either contains the population mean or it doesn't, so its probability is either 1 or 0", but this seems to imply a strange definition of probability that is dependent on unknown states (i.e. a friend flips fair coin, hides the result, and I am disallowed from saying there is a 50% chance that it's heads).  Surely I'm wrong, but I don't see where my logic has gone awry... I've heard that special relativity makes the concept of magnetic fields irrelevant, replacing them with relativistic effects between charges moving in different velocity frames. Is this true? If so, how does this work? I am running Ubuntu 16.10 on a MacbookPro and keys 49 and 94 are inverted... I resolved this problem with xmodmap, but this won't apply permanently. After some research I found xmodmap is no longuer use by Ubuntu but xkb instead. So I searched in the configuration of xkb and I found in the config file /usr/share/X11/xkb/keycodes/macintosh this lines :   xkb_keycodes "badmap" {     &lt;TLDE&gt; =  94;     &lt;LSGT&gt; =  49; };  xkb_keycodes "goodmap" {     &lt;TLDE&gt; =  49;     &lt;LSGT&gt; =  94; };   This is exactly my problem, this two keys are inverted. So I wondering if I can't change my layout configuration with the param badmap.    The ouput of setxkbmap -query -v 10  Setting verbose level to 10 locale is C Trying to load rules file ./rules/evdev... Trying to load rules file /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/evdev... Success. Applied rules from evdev: rules:      evdev model:      pc105 layout:     fr,fr,us variant:    mac,oss, Trying to build keymap using the following components: keycodes:   evdev+aliases(azerty) types:      complete compat:     complete symbols:    pc+fr(mac)+fr(oss):2+us:3+inet(evdev) geometry:   pc(pc105) rules:      evdev model:      pc105 layout:     fr,fr,us variant:    mac,oss, Which focal-length lens is usually used for portrait photography, and why? What focal length or range of focal lengths are usually used for portraits?   What is used by professionals? Why would one select a certain focal length? What are the advantages and disadvantages of different choices, and are there certain situations where an unusual choice might be better? I am struggling with this question from Halmos's text, please ignore the imperative language.  "Suppose that $L, M$  and $N$ are subspaces of a vector space. Show that the equation    $$L \cap (M + N) = (L \cap M) + (L \cap N)$$   is not necessarily true.  Since each of these subspaces has origin in them, clearly there intersections could not be empty. I wasn't able to formulate an example where this result did n't hold. Any help would be highly appreciated. I have heard that most spam filters use a reverse DNS lookup on the originating IP address of the sending SMTP server (or something like that) as part of the verification process.  I want to make sure my emails will pass this check.  How exactly can I verify that my emails are OK?  In researching it, I've noticed that if I look at the header of a valid email message coming from Gmail, I will see something like this:  Received: from mail-pz0-f185.google.com (mail-pz0-f185.google.com [209.85.222.185])         by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 10si2346996pxi.164.2009.07.22.22.26.19;         Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:26:19 -0700 (PDT)   When I do an nslookup on 209.85.222.18, it responds with mail-pz0-f185.google.com, which is what I would expect.  If it responded with a different domain, then I assume that would indicate a problem and it would fail the check.  Is this what the reverse DNS lookup is all about or am I barking up the wrong tree? When Deadpool is in the hallway talking      he makes a joke about Fox springing for a few more X-Men and the camera pans to show Beast closing the door to get rid of the noise.   Who else was in the room? Where $F$,$K$ are two fields. What does the element in the composite field $FK$ look like? All the elements are generated by the elements of $F$ and $K$? (combination of the elements of $F$ and $K$) I think $FK$ is pretty close to the free product of $F$ and $K$; is $FK \subsetneq F*K$? Thank you! Is there any way to deserialize JSON into an object using JSON.deserialize if some of the property names in the JSON are reserved words in apex? I want to do something like this:  string jsonString = '{"currency" : "ABC"}'; public class JSONResult {     public string currency; } JSONResult res = (JSONResult) JSON.deserialize(jsonString, JSONResult.class); system.debug(res);   but of course I get an error that the identifier name is reserved. Laws and theories What is a , a , and what is the relationship among them?  I know this is a very basic question, so any reference to epistemology will be greatly appreciated :) Dynamic pivot: sum of sales per month My table is like this:  Sitecode    Month  Amount --------    -----  ------ XX          Jan     1000 XX          Jan     3000 XX          Apr     3000 XX          Apr     1000   What I want is, to show the result something like this:  Sitecode    MonthJAN   MonthAPR --------    --------   -------- XX          4000       4000 My neighbor keeps complaining about my music. How to soundproof my apartment? I live in an old apartment building and the walls are thin. This is a problem because I love to listen to music -- sometimes at odd hours of the night. Yes, I can be an asshole in this way. But my neighbor bangs against the wall even when I'm being perfectly reasonable (his bedroom seems to share a wall with my living room). And it's not just the low frequencies that get to him. He knocks against the wall even when I turn the subwoofer off on my speakers, which are located on the opposite wall.   This is kinda unacceptable. This is my home! What can I do so that I can live in it the way I want?