How to install all updates without Internet? I have Windows 7 Home Premium without internet access.  Is there a way I can download and install all of the updates that I would normally have gotten through Windows Update?  I can download from another machine and transfer using a USB drive, but I can't download anything locally (otherwise I'd use Windows Update).  The machine I can connect to the internet with is a Mac, not Windows.  So I can't use any Windows-specific software.
Offline update of Windows? What options, if any, exist for offline update of Microsoft  Windows?  If a solution exists please list your experience using it.    Background:  If for any reason a computer does not have a connection to  the Internet or the connection is too slow to download  several hundreds of megabytes every so often some kind of  offline Windows Update is required.  In a multi-computer environment a lot of bandwidth (and thus in some cases money) and/or  time could also be saved if it is possible to update in an  offline manner.
At the start of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's/Sorceror's Stone Voldemort's Killing Curse backfires      due to Lily's sacrifice protecting Harry from Voldemort.   leaving Harry with his scar      and a loose piece of Voldemort's soul   and Voldemort as a loose soul, self-described as "Less than a ghost".  Voldemort was not dead, but had no physical body (until he got better in book 4).  What happened to his body?  Did it disappear?  Or was it left in the rubble of the house, alongside the bodies of James and Lily? Functions that are sets of all function - proofs I'm going through the book Proofs and fundamentals, by Bloch, and it doesn't include a solution manual for it's examples. It doesn't have many examples on notation and proof strategy for certain cases, so I needed a little help.    Although I understand the idea, and can draw it out, I'm not sure how to write it in decent proof notation. Any help would be appreciated!   Edit: apologies, my idea is this: theres some function in $F(C,A\times B)$ such that theres some $x$ within $C$ that means $g(x)$ is within $A\times B$. Similarly, the second two imply that for some function within $F(A,C)$ there exists a value $x$ such that $g(x)=C$. and similarly for the third part from $B\rightarrow C$. It's easy to see with drawing it out that these two are the same because one will have a part within A and the other will lead to a part within $B$, so their cross will be the same. I wanted to go about proving it by setting a function $f$ within $F(C,AxB)$ and then working from there, but I really have no idea where to start or the notation. Can someone please explain the difference between the protected and protected internal modifiers in C#? It looks like their behavior is identical. How does JavaScript .prototype work? Convergence of $1-\frac12-\frac13+\frac14+\frac15+\frac16-....$ How do I escape a single quote ( ' ) in JavaScript? PDF upload silently fails I dunno since when, but upload of PDF images fails, this hurts especially on tex.SE.  Could this be an effect of an updated /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml on the imgur server?  At least on my Ubuntu 18.04 LTS machine, this file was modified two weeks ago. Why is any number (other than zero) to the power of zero equal to one? Please include in your answer an explanation of why $0^0$ should be undefined. Metrizable topological space $X$ with every admissible metric complete then $X$ is compact How to prove:      If $X$ is a metrizable topological space and every admissible metric on $X$ is complete then $X$ is compact.    I was trying with an idea of contradiction and thereby to construct an incomplete metric on $X$. But not able to construct. Style Guide: Bold, Italic, or Quotes When I Want to Emphasize Something Let’s say I have many lists of this kind on a page:   Click on the Foo button. Tick the Bar box. Click on the Save button.   How should I emphasize Foo, Bar, and Save?   Bold?   Click on the Foo button. Tick the Bar box. Click on the Save button.  Italic?   Click on the Foo button. Tick the Bar box. Click on the Save button.  Quotes?   Click on the “Foo” button. Tick the “Bar” box. Click on the “Save” button.    NOTE: I want the lists to be read as easy as possible. There are a number of times in Lord of the Rings where the "east" is mentioned -- the pirate ships, the slave-driven farms. And of course all of the peoples subservient to Sauron who come to fight Gondor and the West. Are there any maps of the East of Middle-earth, and what is out there? I can't seem to get this hat on straight! I carefully positioned my hat to fit my head just right:     But it seems to be shifted to the left a few pixels elsewhere (same in Firefox and Chrome):   Stack Overfow   Skeptics   The top bar is also affected on some sites:   Stack Overfow   Meta SE   InfoSec   However, it is in the correct position in the top bar on some sites somehow:   Skeptics   Bricks   It's not a huge deal of course, it just bothers perfectionists like me. How can you get the permalink for an answer to a question? I wanted to link to an answer to a Stack Overflow question, but couldn't find a way to do it. I couldn't get the ID of the answer in order to create the link.  How can you get the permalink for an answer to a question? When is using the past perfect tense not necessary? Understanding reference counting with Cocoa and Objective-C I'm just beginning to have a look at Objective-C and Cocoa with a view to playing with the iPhone SDK. I'm reasonably comfortable with C's malloc and free concept, but Cocoa's references counting scheme has me rather confused. I'm told it's very elegant once you understand it, but I'm just not over the hump yet.  How do release, retain and autorelease work and what are the conventions about their use?  (Or failing that, what did you read which helped you get it?) Many introductory quantum mechanics textbooks include simple exercises on computing the de Broglie wavelength of macroscopic objects, often contrasting the results with that of a proton, etc.  For instance, this example, taken from a textbook:     Calculate the de Broglie wavelength for      (a) a proton of kinetic energy 70 MeV      (b) a 100 g bullet moving at 900 m/s   The pedagogical motivation behind these questions is obvious: when the de Broglie wavelength is small compared to the size of an object, the wave behaviour of the object is undetectable.  But what is the validity of the actual approach of applying the formula naively? Of course, a 100g bullet is not a fundamental object of 100g but a lattice of some $10^{23}$ atoms bound by the electromagnetic force. But is the naive answer close to the actual one (i.e. within an order of magnitude or two)? How does one even calculate the de Broglie wavelength for a many body system accurately? Unbiased Estimator for a Uniform Variable Support Let $ x_i $ be iid observations in a sample from a uniform distribution over $ \left[ 0, \theta \right] $.  Now I need to estimate $ \theta $ based on $N$ observations and I want the estimator to be unbiased.  I thought about simple estimator $ \hat{\theta} = \max \left( x_i \right) $.  Based on simulation it is not biased, yet I couldn't show it analytically.  Could anyone, please, show it is unbiased?  BTW, I could easily find another, easy to prove, unbiased estimator, $ \hat{\theta} = 2 \mathrm{mean} \left( {x}_{i} \right) $ Best choice between using \\ or leaving space after each paragraph to end the paragraph Proof Verification: Converse of Intermediate Value Theorem A function $f$ is increasing on $A$ if $f(x)\leq f(y)$ for all $x&lt;y$ in $A$. Show that the Intermediate Value Theorem does have a converse if we assume $f$ is increasing on $[a,b]$.  The converse of IVT along with the additional hypothesis would look like this: Lef $f:[a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be an increasing function on $[a,b]$ which satisfies: if $L$ is a real number such that $f(a)&lt;L&lt;f(b)$ (or $f(a)&gt;L&gt;f(b)$), then there exists a point $c\in (a,b)$ where $f(c)=L.$ If the preceding conditions are met, then $f$ is continuous on $[a,b]$.  The proof (if it's correct) I'm going to show is only for the $c \in (a,b)$, but I think for end points ($a$ or $b$), the method should be similar.  We want to show that given $c \in (a,b)$, for all $\epsilon&gt;0$, there exists a $\delta&gt;0$ such that $|x-c|&lt;\delta \implies |f(x)-f(c)|&lt;\epsilon$.  Since $f$ is increasing, we know that $f(a)\leq f(c)$. If $f(c)-\epsilon&lt;f(a)$, then set $x_1=a$, if $f(c)-\epsilon\geq f(a)$, then we know by hypothesis that a $x_1&lt;c$ exists such that $f(x_1)=f(c)-\epsilon.$ In either case, we have for $x \in (x_1,c]$ $$ f(c)-\epsilon \leq f(x_1) \leq f(x) \leq f(c) .$$  In a similar way, since we know that $f(c)\leq f(b)$, we can deduce that a $x_2&gt;c$ exists such that, for $x \in [c,x_2)$ $$f(c)\leq f(x)\leq f(x_2)\leq f(c)+\epsilon .$$  Pick $\delta = \min \{c-x_1,x_2-c \}$, we then have $$|x-c|&lt;\delta \implies |f(x)-f(c)|&lt;\epsilon .$$  Is this correct? In the proof that I saw, they originally used $\frac{\epsilon}{2}$, instead of just $\epsilon$, but I think this one works just as well, what do you guys think? Why does this stream return no element?