Hi everyone :) I live in Australia. I have a remaining money(2,000USD) from my previous trip in the US. Me and my husband are planning to visit Paris maybe in September. I'm not sure whether to convert all the remaining USD$ to Euro here in Australia or in Paris as I would also like to get better rates. Any suggestion/s are welcome :)
Recently my wife and I traveled to Italy and before we left we got about 85% of our money in travelers checks and the other 15% we carried on in cash. When we arrived there, no one would take our travelers checks and many places did not accept credit cards. Eventually, we found some currency exchange places that would take the travelers checks and give us Euro's, but at a 7-15% fee, which was not really a very fun surprise.   While I was under the impression that it is safer to use travelers checks, it seems that they were not really accepted (the usual explanation being fraud). So the question is, is it best to just exchange your currency at home and carry all of it with you when you travel or are there other alternatives to carrying cash that are safer and cost effective?
I shall come, not will Native speakers, how can you comment such a sentence:  I shall come, not will  Can I use it for  I will definitely come, not maybe    Adding some information other people asked me about.  How I came to such a question.  Here   I asked about "Shall I win?" pointing that it could have some variants of understanding:  1) Shall I win? = Should I win? (suggestion)  2) Shall I win? = Will I win? (archaic with 1st person)  3) Shall I win? = is it 100% that I will win? (predestination\inevitability)  The excellent guy Mixolydian said either variant was possible, that it didn't matter what person you used "shall" with, it could have this "predestination\inevitability" anyway. Out of this we're getting that nowadays we can use "will" for simple future actions and "shall" for almost predicted (almost 100% surety of happening) future actions.  If I want to say to someone:  Don't be afraid, I will come anyway.  Don't get panicked, I will definitely come  Be sure, I will come in any case  I can use "shall" for it meanining an action into which I will put 100% effort:  I shall come!  And what if my original sentence is  Don't doubt, I will definitely come, not maybe or probably  Can I use  I shall come, not will  pointing that "shall" guarantees me putting all my strengths into it while "will" doesn't give any assuarance that I will do everything to finally come.  As I understood, it wasn't very easy to ask such a question because English was different everywhere - US, UK, Australie, Ireland etc. I heard it was acceptabse to use even "thee\thou" in Ireland or somewhere like that while all other world has already forgotten such words...  P.S. What I got from the answers ias that it was better to forget about the existence of "shall" cause it created so many misunderstandings:D I don’t actually need to run the command below, and I am aware of ssh keys if I did want to log in without typing a password. I would just like to know how ssh seems to circumvent my file redirection.  Running the following command, ssh prompts me for a password:  ssh nobody@192.168.1.151 &gt; /dev/null 2&gt; /dev/null &lt; /dev/null   How does this work? stdin, stdout, and stderr are all redirected, but ssh still manages to print a prompt on my screen and read what I type. I tried adding the ssh arguments -t -t and -T (not both at once), to enable or disable pseudo-tty allocation, but it made no difference.  I also tried closing all input and output this way, although I don’t know if I typed it correctly. Still, ssh prompts for a password:  (exec 0&lt;&amp;- 1&lt;&amp;- 2&lt;&amp;- 0&gt;&amp;- 1&gt;&amp;- 2&gt;&amp;-; ssh nobody@192.168.1.151) At the very beginning of SG1, the Goa'uld invade Earth, and then return somehow. How did they manage to return? There was no DHD, and somehow they didn't let it be known where they were going, IE, there was no log of the return. This seems a bit odd to me... Prove that if $(ab)^i = a^ib^i \forall a,b\in G$ for three consecutive integers $i$ then G is abelian US tourism/business visa from non-resident country Need fast solution how to show series expansion of function at x=0:  $$f(x)=\frac{3x}{1+x^2+x^4}$$  Please some hints. WiFi not working Kubuntu 20.04 - Intel 8265 Network Interface I remember after Stargate: Universe was cancelled, that I read, somewhere on the web, either part of an interview or an article by one of the producers about what they were planning if there had been a third season.  (He said they weren't sure whether they'd set it soon after the ending of the second season, or later, or were going to do something else.)  He also wrote that, while he felt okay discussing that, he did not feel like he could reveal how the story about the superstructure the Destiny had found would turn out.  He said that was something the other two producers had worked out and he didn't want to reveal it and would leave it up to them to reveal it if they wanted to.  Was this ever revealed?  Did the other producers ever discuss or reveal anything about what was going to happen with that storyline?    Addition: I'm referring to the superstructure that is the message found in the background radiation throughout the universe, not anything from the planet builders or other easily seen physical structures. Is Dyson Sphere a stable construction? Suppose that a star is encompassed by a . Do we need a position control system for the Dyson Sphere to keep its origin always aligned with the center of the star? Will it stay aligned itself and automatically neutralize small perturbational forces? Or will a small perturbation remove it out of the orbit of the star, so that it will be eventually destroyed and swallowed by the star? Are there experiments that are banned from being done at the LHC? Big tilde in math mode Migrate hard drive with Windows 7 to new laptop? I have a Dell D630 laptop that has Windows 7 Professional on it that was in dire need for replacement so I recently picked up an HP G62 laptop that comes with Windows 7 Home Premium. I don't need both laptops and I'd rather spare myself the time reinstalling all my programs and making sure I didn't forget to migrate any of my data over by simply swapping hard drives from the Dell to the HP.  Well, I tried just that and my HP laptop instantly BSOD'd on startup.  I'm currently running 'Startup Repair' but it's been sitting there for over 20 mins saying &quot;Attempting repairs...&quot; and nothing is really happening so I don't have much faith in this. The good news is that before I swapped the drives I made an Acronis image of the Dell drive and stored it on my NAS so I can pretty much try anything with this drive and still get back to where I was if need be. I find it hard to believe that what I want to do would be rather difficult, although it sure is looking that way.  I'd appreciate any advice in making this happen. Thanks Edit All the answers were great, so thank you.  I accepted djechelon's answer because the Win7 migration tool saved me quite a bit of time. I understand the difference between LET and LET* (parallel versus sequential binding), and as a theoretical matter it makes perfect sense.  But is there any case where you've ever actually needed LET?  In all of my Lisp code that I've looked at recently, you could replace every LET with LET* with no change.  Edit: OK, I understand why some guy invented LET*, presumably as a macro, way back when.  My question is, given that LET* exists, is there a reason for LET to stay around?  Have you written any actual Lisp code where a LET* would not work as well as a plain LET?  I don't buy the efficiency argument.  First, recognizing cases where LET* can be compiled into something as efficient as LET just doesn't seem that hard.  Second, there are lots of things in the CL spec that simply don't seem like they were designed around efficiency at all.  (When's the last time you saw a LOOP with type declarations?  Those are so hard to figure out I've never seen them used.)  Before Dick Gabriel's benchmarks of the late 1980's, CL was downright slow.  It looks like this is another case of backwards compatibility: wisely, nobody wanted to risk breaking something as fundamental as LET.  Which was my hunch, but it's comforting to hear that nobody has a stupidly-simple case I was missing where LET made a bunch of things ridiculously easier than LET*. Where is the open source project for the WMD editor used on this site? Suppose $z\neq -1$ is a complex number of norm 1m $(|z| =1)$. I know that $z= n + mi$, what is the most straightforward way of solving this problem? I was also given the following sketch for a possible approach. Windows 10 upgrade assistant stuck at 99% Installed Windows 7 Ultimate (64-bit) on a fresh PC and after installing service pack 1 started the upgrade to Windows 10. The assistant app downloads and verifies but gets stuck at 99% in the upgrading window phase. Even after hours it remains stuck there.  I've tried to reboot the machine and that doesn't help either. I've googled and found out that others have faced the exact problem but so far there isn't any solution that works.  Has anyone seen that situation and is there a fix for it? Code snippets for methods in Visual Studio How to prevent form from being submitted? How long can I store a food in the pantry, refrigerator, or freezer? How do I know if a given food or ingredient I have is still good, or if I should discard it?  How can I best preserve a food or ingredient?     This broad question is intended as a "general reference" question to quickly answer many how long will food keep for? questions. Please feel free to edit this question to expand and clarify as needed. Pass in an array of Deferreds to $.when()