I am moving from Malaysia to the US, and planning to bring my desktop computer with me. I plan to pack it in my checked-in luggage. Will the computer risk being damaged? Any precaution should I take to reduce this risk? Will there be any trouble with the airline or immigration about bringing computer?
On an upcoming trip, I will be taking a desktop computer and monitor as checked luggage (on a United/Continental flight). What should I be aware of when doing this? What needs to be done to properly protect all the components? Are there any airline policies I should be aware of?
Digonalizable Polynomial Matrix For any polynomial $p(x) = a_0 + a_1x + · · · + a^kx^k$ and any square matrix A, $p(A)$ is defined as $p(A) = a_0I + a_1A + · · · + a_kA^k$. Show that if v is any eigenvector of A and $χ_A(x)$ is the characteristic polynomial of A, then $χ_A(A)v = 0$, Deduce that if A is diagonalizable then $χ_A(A)$ is the zero matrix.  I got that $p(\lambda)$ is the eigenvalue of $p(A)$ and if A is diagonalizable then $χ_A(x)$ is the zero matrix since p(A) is similar to its diagonal matrix p(D)  $$p(D) = a_nD_n + · · · + a_1D + a_0I$$  =  $\begin{matrix} p(\lambda_1) &amp;0&amp;...&amp;0\\0&amp; p(\lambda_2)&amp;...&amp; 0 \\ ...&amp;...&amp;...&amp;...\\0&amp;0&amp;... &amp; p(\lambda_n) \end{matrix}$ I've had  on the web since 1999, and I'd like to add a page on why complex numbers are (or should be) considered to be numbers.  I'm frequently asked that question.  This is not a question about the existence or usefulness of complex numbers as they do exist as mathematical entities and they are very useful.  It is a question about what makes them numbers.  It could be broadened to ask what constitutes numbers, but I'm specifically interested in complex numbers.  Perhaps it's just historical and sociological, but I'm hoping for an answer that there's something intrinsic about complex numbers that makes them fit into the category of number. What are "Community Wiki" posts? Otherwise, is there any alternative command line utility that can achieve this? Removing all fraction symbols like “¼” and “½” from a string Proving $v(s,p)=2^{p-1}(2s-1)$ is a bijection of natural numbers and $f(s)=2s-1$ is a bijection between natural numbers and odd numbers. How do I prove this function is bijective? $$ v(s,p)=2^{p-1}(2s-1). $$ The domain is natural numbers and the codomain is also the natural numbers.  And this one: $$ f(s)=2s-1. $$ The domain is the natural numbers, and the codomain is the odd numbers in the natural numbers.  With this one I would do this to show it's injective: $$ \begin{align} v(s)&amp;=v(s_1)\\ \implies 2s-1&amp;=2s_1-1\\ \implies (2s_1)/2&amp;=(2s_2)/2\\ \implies s=s_1 \end{align} $$ So it's injective since if $v(s)=v(s_1)$ then $s=s_1$.  And to show it's surjective $f(s)=y$: $$ \begin{align} y&amp;=2s-1\\ \implies s&amp;=(y+1)/2 \end{align} $$ Then the function must be surjective since every $y$ is the same as the codomain for $f$.  Am I correct? Command for taking a screenshot to a new file I recently read this , which stated:     For scientists trying to design a compound that will attach itself to,   and modify, a target disease pathway, the critical first step is to   determine the electronic structure of the molecule. But modeling the   structure of a molecule of an everyday drug such as penicillin, which   has 41 atoms at ground state, requires a classical computer with some   $10^{86}$ bits—more transistors than there are atoms in the observable   universe. Such a machine is a physical impossibility. But for quantum   computers, this type of simulation is well within the realm of   possibility, requiring a processor with 286 quantum bits, or qubits.   Along with this resource estimate for penicillin, I've also seen  of the number of qubits required to model the ground state of caffeine (160 qubits). Given that the above report offers no reference(s) (probably in the name of business intelligence) and much Internet searching and looking into the quantum chemistry literature has come up short, my question is: Where are these resource estimates coming from – is there a journal article that published these numbers? I would really like to identify the methodology and assumptions used in making these estimates. Some Windows 10 UWP icons not displaying on search, or in settings Why does $\tan^{-1}(1)+\tan^{-1}(2)+\tan^{-1}(3)=\pi$? Playing around on wolframalpha shows $\tan^{-1}(1)+\tan^{-1}(2)+\tan^{-1}(3)=\pi$. I know $\tan^{-1}(1)=\pi/4$, but how could you compute that $\tan^{-1}(2)+\tan^{-1}(3)=\frac{3}{4}\pi$ to get this result? Breadcrumb hyperlink header Why is mathematical induction a valid proof technique? Entire function $f$ such that $|f(z)| ≤ K |z|^3$ for $|z|\ge1$ and $f(z) = f(iz)$ for every $z∈C$ Let $f(z)$ be an entire function such that for some constant $K$ , $|f(z)| ≤ K$ $|z|^3&lt;$ for $|z|\ge1$ and $f(z) = f(iz)$ $∀z∈C$ , then which of the following are correct ?  (A)$ f(z) = Kz^3$ $∀ z∈\Bbb{C}$ (B) $f(z)$ is a constant function (C) $f(z)$ is quadratic function (D) No such $f$ exists   My attempt : I can deduce that since $f(z) = f(iz)$ and since $i^4=1 \implies f$ must involve only fourth powers of $z$ . Hence $f(z)=a_1z^4+b_1z^8+c_1z^{16}+ \cdots $-------(1)  Also for $|z| \ge 1 $: let C.   Then $|g(z)| = |f(z)|/|z^3| \le k$ => By the Cauchy estimate theorem we can prove that :  $f(z)/z^3$ is a constant function $= c $   $\implies f(z)=cz^3$ for $|z| &gt; 1$     ...........(2)  From (1) and (2) ; we get  there does not exist a function like this ?  My textbook answer says it's a constant function ? I'm trying to solve an exercise about first order stochastic dominance, and there is this one question that I'm not able to answer.  Here are the hypothesis of the exercise:  Let Y ∼ F and Y' ∼ G, that means Y (resp. Y') has a probability law given by the distribution function F (resp. G).  Assume that Y ≥ 0 and Y' ≥ 0 and E(Y) + E(Y')&lt; ∞.  Here comes the question:  -Show that if the survival function of Y first order dominates over the survival function of Y', then if Y and Y' are independent, we have P(Y ≥ Y') ≥ 1/2.  I don't see how to use that Y and Y' are in this case independant.  Maybe I should set X=Y-Y' and then use the convolution?  Any help, would be appreciated, thanks !  Alex Tony's suit is an engineering marvel, and they explain many facets of the technology to help give legitimacy to the special powers, abilities and weapons it has.  I never read the Iron Man comics, but in the movie they really don't have a technological explanation for how he miraculously seems to be unaffected by crushing G-forces of sudden acceleration, the inertia of sudden stops and hair-pin turns, and especially the blunt force trauma from getting smashed in the face with Thor's hammer.  Certainly it appears the suit takes punishment, but Tony always remains unscatched, never a collapsed lung, broken bone or even a bloody nose.  In my infantile understanding of theoretical physics, the same technology that would be used to counter G-forces and sudden blunt force trauma to the body inside would be the very same technology used for  which in my honest opinion would be a much more stunning technological achievement than his heralded Arc Reactor.  Was their ever an explanation proferred for this and if so was it indeed attributed to Anti-Gravity? Looking for a short story about a man who is visiting a planet where you get your position/job through playing a game I read this story 8-15 years ago in German. I'm not sure but I think the book had 2 short, totally different stories in it.  The story was about a man who was sent (I think kinda forced to go) to a planet where he should play a game everyone on that planet plays. I think the goal was to beat their leader and conquer the world like this?  The better you are at the game, the higher is your position in the society. I remember that at the end he was playing against the leader and they had a long back and forth game, but I'm not sure who won.  They played the game on a different planet that had only one stripe of forest around the whole planet and a fire that goes around it. But thats only the location they were playing.  The man was chosen because he was the best player in every game if I remember correctly.  The game was a board like game where you have troops or armies that you move around. It was not an easy game everyone just could play. Sending an HTTP request using QNetworkAccessManager How to randomize (shuffle) a JavaScript array? Is there a way to detach matplotlib plots so that the computation can continue? After these instructions in the Python interpreter one gets a window with a plot:  from matplotlib.pyplot import * plot([1,2,3]) show() # other code   Unfortunately, I don't know how to continue to interactively explore the figure created by show() while the program does further calculations.  Is it possible at all? Sometimes calculations are long and it would help if they would proceed during examination of intermediate results. Posting and answering questions you have already found the answer to