When I'm on the Login page in production, I've the cookies blocked error. Screencapture:
I have a WordPress website that I recently discovered had this error on the login page:     ERROR: Cookies are blocked due to unexpected output. For help, please   see this documentation or try the support forums.   I can only access the login page from wp-login.php, since /wp-admin/ displays a blank white page.  I've searched the web and tried many things with no success:   Removing ?&gt; and space at end of the functions.php Ensuring both functions.php and wp-config.php had no spaces at beginning or end of file Opening wp-config.php and functions.php in Notepad++ and converting to UTF-8 (people recommend 'without BOM' but that is only an option in the newest version of Notepad++ - I'm guessing UTF-8 does that now) I've set WP_DEBUG to true and have received no errors in debug.log,  except for 2 that relate to when I hadn't fully uploaded some files. That particular error mentioned nav-menu.php; this confirmed that it is reporting errors, just not related to my login issues I renamed each plugin folder with _tmp at the end to try and rule out any plugins causing the problem I also renamed the plugins folder to rule out all plugins at the same time   Given these things I've tried, and that I'm not receiving any PHP errors, what else could I try?
How can Cooper communicate with his daughter before the time he went to space? In the movie Interstellar it's shown that after Cooper fell into the Black Hole, he communicates with his daughter Murph through some codes as Ghost. My doubt is how can he communicate to his daughter before he goes into space? I didn’t get the logic of that part. Can anyone please make it clear? Change web folders names with uppercase to lowercase or not? Calculating determinant with different numbers on diagonal and x everywhere else I'm having troubles solving the following determinant:  $$\left|   \begin{array}{cccc}     a_1 &amp; x &amp; \ldots &amp; x \\    x &amp; a_2 &amp; \ldots &amp; \vdots \\     \vdots &amp; \ldots &amp; \ddots &amp; x \\     x &amp; \ldots &amp; x &amp; a_n \\   \end{array} \right|$$  I have tried coming up with recurrent formula, but there's always one lingering row and column. I also tried finding values of x for which determinant is 0, hoping I could get a nice polynomial solution, with no luck.  By subtracting first row from every other I get somewhat nicer result, but there's still that one row/column which I can't solve. If all other columns are added to the first one and then I subtract the first row, then the column doesn't depend on x anymore, but I haven't found 1..n much more useful. How to execute a Matlab script from C++ What does the number in parentheses shown after Unix command names in manpages mean? Finite choice without AC Can anyone explain how we choose one sock from each of finitely many pairs without the axiom of choice?  I mean : To choose one sock from each of infinitely many pairs of socks requires the Axiom of Choice, but for shoes the Axiom is not needed.  The idea is that the two socks in a pair are identical in appearance, and so we must make an arbitrary choice if we wish to choose one of them. For shoes, we can use an explicit algorithm -- e.g., "always choose the left shoe." Why does Russell's statement mention infinitely many pairs? Well, if we only have finitely many pairs of socks, then AC is not needed -- we can choose one member of each pair using the definition of "nonempty," and we can repeat an operation finitely many times using the rules of formal logic (not discussed here). Say I have a metric space $(X, d)$ and a set $A\in X$.  I want to prove that if $a \in \overline{A}$ then there is a convergent sequence $\{x_n\}$ that converges to $a$. Could I have any help? How can we prove that every odd perfect square is congruent to $1$ modulo $8$? Is there an easy method for installing binary builds of glibc? Time and time again I see questions such as these:       And these are the types of solutions we're typically pushing:        Is this really the best we can do? Aren't there binary builds of GLIBC that we can simply unzip into a directory such as /opt/myglibc, and set the $LD_LIBRARY_PATH or whatever and run whatever application we want, without issues?   An application, such as the newer builds of Chrome (28+) that appear to require GLIBC 2.14?  NOTE: This thread titled:  on tecmint.com is what ultimately got me thinking about this.  References Opposite of "straight talk" What is the opposite for the straight talk idiom? How do I best call the activity when someone makes a very long preamble before he says what he wants? I'm looking for a specific scifi book that I read years ago, I only partially remember the story, and I don't remember the author or the title.  What I remember of the story is:   An alien race picks up a signal from humans that includes instructions on how to make their own humans (genetic instructions). The humans grow up knowing they are created and are taught by the alien race. They are eventually given resources to build a ship, and go looking for their origins. They eventually find the solar system, but nobody answers. They find some stations orbiting earth and find that the station is very old, so old in fact that humans have long been extinct and other creatures have reached local space, and have been looking around the station as an archeological dig. I think they refer to two developed races from earth, but one developed from rats.   If anyone know what story this is, and can point me at it, its been driving me crazy for at least 15 years, and I think it's actually been much longer, since I can't remember when I read it. What is the best way to give a C# auto-property an initial value? How do you give a C# auto-property an initial value?  I either use the constructor, or revert to the old syntax.    Using the Constructor:  class Person  {     public Person()     {         Name = "Initial Name";     }     public string Name { get; set; } }   Using normal property syntax  (with an initial value)  private string name = "Initial Name"; public string Name  {     get      {         return name;     }     set     {         name = value;     } }   Is there a better way? Runtime's exec() method is not redirecting the output Failed a Reopen Question audit — sure looks like "Not a real question" to me I just failed , which was shown as being closed as "Not a real question".  Seeing as the vote count was positive, I figured it was an audit, but I selected "Leave Closed" anyways because to me     It's difficult to tell what is being asked here.  This question is ambiguous, vague...   There's no code examples, and the phrasing is clunky at best.  This is my second failed audit in two days for difficult questions (first failed audit is , also now closed), so if I get temporarily suspended, it won't be the end of the world (I'll think of it as a forced vacation).    That said, is there a way to dispute these audits?  Or is posting the audit here sufficient? Where is .bashrc? Prettiest way to typeset "C++" (cplusplus)? Writing "C++" in plain text results in an ugly setting, as the '+' signs are too big and too spaced:    I've seen around the web several marcos for typesetting the "C++" symbol, ranging from mild kerning to shrinking, raising and lowering the '+' signs.  What is your version of a \cpp{} macro? I got the following problem: Right now I am checking my equations, which are usually written in align. This looks great in most of the cases, but sometimes the pagebreaks are weird, ie there is a lot of vertical whitespace left (like 2.5cm) at the end of a page. I made the following MWE to illustrate this.  \documentclass[a4paper, 12pt, headsepline]{scrreprt} \usepackage[onehalfspacing]{setspace} \usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, mathtools} \usepackage{mathptmx} \usepackage[a4paper]{geometry} \geometry{left=2cm,right=5cm,top=2cm,bottom=2cm} % \usepackage{lipsum} %\lipsum \usepackage[pangram]{blindtext}  \begin{document} \Blindtext[1][3]%1 paragraph, 3 pangrams \begin{align} X_{t+1} &amp;=  \frac{X_{t+1}+X_{t+1}}{Y_t}  \label{eq:1}  \intertext{Solving...:} \notag  X_{t}  &amp;=  \frac{X_{t+1}+X_{t+1}}{Y_{t+1}} \notag \\ \intertext{Solving further...:} \notag  % ===PAGEBREAK HERE: 2nd page begins=== &amp;= \frac{X_{t+1}+X_{t+1}}{Y_t} +  \frac{X_{t+1}+X_{t+1}}{Y_t}  \notag \\ &amp;= \frac{X_{t+1}+X_{t+1}}{Y_t}...  \notag \\ \intertext{Solving further...:} &amp; = \frac{X_{t+1}+X_{t+1}}{Y_t}  \notag \end{align}  \end{document}   In the MWE, the first 'Solving further' should be on the first page instead (to save space and it would also look better I guess?). The position where I would like the pagebreak to be is also marked as a comment in the MWE.  My question is first on a general basis: Which is the best environment to achieve multiple line equations, which can be aligned as in align, and to save space at the same time? Or to be more precise: If possible, I'd like to stick with align and adapt the pagebreaks only if necessary.  Thanks! What is the advantage to crushed garlic over minced garlic beyond texture? I use a lot of garlic in my cooking, especially minced garlic.  But lately I've been doing some more recipes with crushed garlic and while I love the texture of cooked garlic, I can't see how it could be better than minced garlic for the overall taste.  Is there an advantage to crushed garlic over minced garlic, beyond texture? How to convert a string of bytes into an int? How can I convert a string of bytes into an int in python?   Say like this: 'y\xcc\xa6\xbb'  I came up with a clever/stupid way of doing it:  sum(ord(c) &lt;&lt; (i * 8) for i, c in enumerate('y\xcc\xa6\xbb'[::-1]))   I know there has to be something builtin or in the standard library that does this more simply...  This is different from  for which you can use int(xxx, 16), but instead I want to convert a string of actual byte values.  UPDATE:  I kind of like James' answer a little better because it doesn't require importing another module, but Greg's method is faster:  &gt;&gt;&gt; from timeit import Timer &gt;&gt;&gt; Timer('struct.unpack("&lt;L", "y\xcc\xa6\xbb")[0]', 'import struct').timeit() 0.36242198944091797 &gt;&gt;&gt; Timer("int('y\xcc\xa6\xbb'.encode('hex'), 16)").timeit() 1.1432669162750244   My hacky method:  &gt;&gt;&gt; Timer("sum(ord(c) &lt;&lt; (i * 8) for i, c in enumerate('y\xcc\xa6\xbb'[::-1]))").timeit() 2.8819329738616943   FURTHER UPDATE:  Someone asked in comments what's the problem with importing another module. Well, importing a module isn't necessarily cheap, take a look:  &gt;&gt;&gt; Timer("""import struct\nstruct.unpack("&gt;L", "y\xcc\xa6\xbb")[0]""").timeit() 0.98822188377380371   Including the cost of importing the module negates almost all of the advantage that this method has. I believe that this will only include the expense of importing it once for the entire benchmark run; look what happens when I force it to reload every time:  &gt;&gt;&gt; Timer("""reload(struct)\nstruct.unpack("&gt;L", "y\xcc\xa6\xbb")[0]""", 'import struct').timeit() 68.474128007888794   Needless to say, if you're doing a lot of executions of this method per one import than this becomes proportionally less of an issue. It's also probably i/o cost rather than cpu so it may depend on the capacity and load characteristics of the particular machine. Why don't wizards always use multiple wands?