I want create advertising folder on USB stick.  Therefore I want to unable user from removing it. even if they format it.  It is possible?
What is the method to make files in a USB Flash Drive undeletable? Does these method work with USB 3.0 interface?  (I have surveyed some Flash Drive manufacturers, and I only see undeletable files for USB 2.0 drives, and not 3.0 drives. One manufacturer claimed that USB 3.0 cannot do undeletable file, so I am curious whether the claim is correct...)
Unwanted comma between author and year using citet command I've been using the biblatex package for a while, and since updating my TeX installation (post-el capitan upgrade) I have been experiencing the following.   If the following is typed:  Such and such has been said \citep[111]{citekey}.   The following text is displayed:  Such and such has been said (Author, 2016, p. 111).   And if the following is typed:  \citet[111]{citekey} has said such and such.   The following text is displayed:  Author, (2016, p. 111) has said such and such.   The citep command is working as I want it to, but I do not want a comma placed after the author's name when using the citet command. I would like it to display as follows:  Author (2016, p. 111) has said such and such.    If I use the \citeyearpar command, it is fine, but I would rather not have to type the author's name in manually.   Here is the command placed in the preamble:  \usepackage[backend=bibtex, style=authoryear-icomp, url=true, isbn=false, natbib=true, sortcites=true, block=space, pagetracker=false, loccittracker=constrict]{biblatex}   Here is an example of an entry in my bib file (made using BibDesk):  @article{poldrack2006, Author = {Poldrack, Russell}, Journal = {Trends in Cognitive Sciences}, Number = {2}, Pages = {59--63}, Title = {{Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?}}, Volume = {10}, Year = {2006}}   I have also tried changing the entry to the following:  @article{poldrack2006, Author = {Russell Poldrack}, Journal = {Trends in Cognitive Sciences}, Number = {2}, Pages = {59--63}, Title = {{Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?}}, Volume = {10}, Year = {2006}}   The bibliography entry appears as follows, and is fine:  Poldrack, Russell (2006). “Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?” In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10.2, pp. 59–63.  Thank you for any help that can be offered. How To Make A Solid Object Drop To The Ground Like It Was Liquid What is the recommended CIDR when creating VPC on AWS? I have been creating AWS VPCs and I am wondering if there is a recommended CIDR value when creating VPCs. What are the factors that I must consider when choosing a CIDR and does the CIDR value affect the performance of the network? windows 7 desktop icons: new icon placement When moving/saving/etc a new file on the desktop, the icon appears second (just after "Computer"). I find it annoying, since I want my "special" icons to be first (such as the recycle bin, "Network", etc.).  Can this behavior be changed? I saw him crossing the road.   I saw him cross the road.   Which one is correct and why? I have got a template class as follows:  class MyClass&lt;T&gt; {     T field;     public void myMethod()     {        field = new T(); // gives compiler error     } }   How do I create a new instance of T in my class? As an example, consider the two sentences:     There don't seem to be any doctors here.   and     There doesn't seem to be any doctors here.   To my ear, the first sounds great, and the second is painfully awkward.  So which is correct, grammatically? I've found lots of disagreement on this around the Web, with various sources citing different ways of treating the word "any" (as singular, always, or as either depending on to what it refers). No consensus, however, could I locate. Showing this metric space is complete Let $X=(0,1]$ and $d(x,y)=\left|\frac{1}{x}-\frac{1}{y}\right|$. I've proven $(X,d)$ is a metric space but I don't know how to show its completeness. How can I do that? How does the T-1000 see? In Terminator 2: Judgement Day, how does the T-1000 sense things? It's made of mimetic poly alloy; however, does it have a retinal scan camera like the T-X or T-800, or is just molecules that allow it to see what it does? In other words: let's say it is made out of nanobots. Would a group of these nanobots provide the capability of sight? Kind of like humans with cells that  make up the brain? I have always wondered whether James Cameron explained this on a special edition or if the topic was left up for insight from Terminator fans. From what I get from the whole mimetic poly alloy and some of the extra scenes, it seems to feel its way out to get information. Of course, it's very much not blind! Thoughts? How does damage dealt increase as you level up I've recently taken over as GM in my group.  We are all new to RPGs except for our original GM, so they decided to run an adventure path so it would be easier to change GMs if they had to stop playing.  Along this path, we had one CR 4 encounter that took us an hour, almost killed our bloodrager and knocked our brawler unconscious. When we leveled up, our GM told us to increase the damage we did by "one level," so my 1d6 became 2d6 and my friend's 2d6 became 4d6.  I saw no problem with this as a player, but I was looking over the adventure path and later encounters that also have a CR of 4 could be ended in one turn by our bloodrager. This would make encounters really boring, and my goal is to avoid boredom.  My question is: As you level up, how does the damage you do increase? Does it go up like my GM said so that at level 3 my rapier does 3d6 and the bloodrager's earth breaker does 6d6, or does it go up by some other method?  I have read the PHB and I don't think that what the GM was saying is correct, but being a first-time player I wasn't sure if had just missed something, so I figured I should ask elsewhere. Our company would like to understand the effects:   If we have single table with Primary Key Identity column, int primary key IDENTITY(1,1),  and the Application is conducting multi-threading parallel processing, trying to conducts 1000s of simultaneous inserts on one table.   Would the identity primary key column fail, with a primary key violation in any way, for example: processors are trying to input the same identity number?  Or was SQL designed to be successful even in multithreading parallel insert?  Note: IDENTITY_INSERT is OFF What do you call a person who keeps reminding others of one’s favors for them? When you fight with a person who then keeps telling you I did that I did this for you and so on. I want to tell them that it's inappropriate to remind others of the favors you did for them, especially if I appreciate those favors and try my best to return them. Where did the pardon come from? In the  episode  (S04E08), Barristan Selmy is presented with a Royal Pardon supposedly signed by the late Robert Baratheon for Ser Jorah Morment by a lowly boy of Meereen.  However, it is a bit confusing to me as where this actually came from.  Is this the same pardon that Jorah had towards the beginning of the series while Robert was actually alive, or is this pardon one that Tywin actually forged and wrote in a previous episode (remember he asks Mace Tyrell for a quill after learning about Dany's recent actions and allies).  It being from Tywin makes sense but this point is brought up by Jorah and then defeated a sentence later as he himself states it is not a forged Pardon.    So which is it and why would Jorah say it is not a forged copy if it indeed is? Brackets in if condition: why am I getting syntax errors without whitespace? Background - I am doing my PhD in atmospheric physics/photobiology.  Here is a scenario:   The experiments are complete - the results are far better than expected  Successfully got the computer program to work properly and have developed another Papers are published Much of the thesis is drafted   The light at the end of the tunnel is most definitely no longer an oncoming train.  But, at this stage, you just don't feel like working on the thesis, you do other things like cleaning, reading, watching movies - procrastination gets worse, and worse despite the submission deadline coming closer.     The procrastination resulting in more apathy towards the project, despite being fully aware of how much work has been put into the project, how much has been achieved and how little, comparatively, needs to be done.  What strategies are there to overcome this academic-apathy, particularly in this late stage of the thesis? Why isn't the gamma function defined so that $\Gamma(n) = n! $? How to do volumetric lighting for a forest scene? Category-theoretic limit related to topological limit? Is there any connection between category-theoretic term 'limit' (=universal cone) over diagram, and topological term 'limit point' of a sequence, function, net...?  To be more precise, is there a category-theoretic setting of some non-trivial topological space such that these different concepts of term 'limit' somehow relate?  This question came to me after I saw (  ) a surprising fact that generalised metric spaces can be seen as categories enriched over preorder $([0,\infty],\leq)$. Show that if $a^{n-1} \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$ for all $a$ such that $\gcd(n,a) = 1$, then $a^{n} \equiv a \pmod{n}$ for all $a$. In Burton's Elementary Number Theory, when introducing absolute pseudoprimes (also called Carmichael numbers), the author states that they are composite numbers $n$ such that $a^{n-1} \equiv 1 \pmod n$ for all integers $a$ with $\gcd(a,n) = 1$.   When showing that 561 is an absolute pseudoprime, he then concludes that $a^{561} \equiv a \pmod{561}$ for all $a$.   I searched a bit on the internet, and it seems that these two are actually equivalent definitions of a Carmichael number. However I have not been able to find a proof; the fact that the implication in the title of the post is stated so plainly in my textbook makes me think it is quite simple to see, but I can't seem to understand the argument. I'm trying to prove that $(ma, mb) = $|$m$|$(a, b)$ , where $(ma, mb)$ is the greatest common divisor between $ma$ and $mb$. My thoughts: If $(ma, mb) = d$ , then $d$|$ma$ and $d$|$mb$ → $d$|$max + mby$ → $d$|$m(ax+by)$. This implies that $d$|$m$ or $d$|$(ax+by)$. This is the same as  $d$|$m$ or $d$|$a$ and $d$|$b$, so $d$|$m$ or $d$|$(a,b)$. This is the same as $d$|$m|$ or $d|(a,b)$, so $d$|$|m|(a,b)$. I don't know what to do.