Does anyone remember a book about Aliens that invaded earth and controlled people with a cap. The main character had a defective cap so he was able to think for himself. He went on an adventure to find freedom from the aliens. Does anyone remember anything like this?
I remember reading a series when I was around 7th or 8th grade about aliens who had taken over Earth by putting metal caps on people when they were "entering adulthood" to control them (not direct control, but it would keep them from rebelling). There was a faction of people who able to escape and had fake caps and would save teens who were about to be capped.  The main protagonist was a teen boy who was a boxer (or training to be a boxer or something). The aliens would hold tournaments for the humans and whoever won would be "worthy" to serve as personal slaves to the aliens.     The protagonist won and was able to get inside to try and learn more about the aliens from the inside.
Can Cycles renders be done from the command line? It seems that Cycles is mainly built in the form of Python scripts (as far as I can tell). Is it still possible to use Cycles to render a .blend file from the command line? Ever since I upgraded to 15.10, fdisk -l reports 16 ram disks (/dev/ram0 ... /dev/ram15). I'm a bit unsure what those are needed for. Is it safe to delete them? If not, how can I get rid of that fdisk output? What is the difference between Affection and Friendship, if any? I've risen Pokemon Amie Affection to 5 hearts on my Riolo in the hopes that it will evolve as soon as it levels up, but I'm not certain that this is the same thing as friendship, and I'd like to not waste a level.  My question is this: What is the difference between Pokemon Amie Affection and the Friendship stat? Why is this function continuous, unlike the Dirichlet function? Chrome asks for password to unlock keyring on startup In Google Chrome, when I go to a login page, a window pops up asking to "Enter password for keyring 'default' to unlock". In most cases, whether I click Cancel or enter my password, the login form gets auto filled anyway.  How do I get rid of the popup? I want it to auto login each time, not ask for my system password. The dialog box never appears for any other apps. Is there a single word for 'without a beginning'? Is it the "Stack Exchange Network" or the "Stack Overflow Network"? Is there any direct relation among first, third, fourth order moments? is a one-by-one-matrix just a number (scalar)? I was wondering. Clearly, we cannot multiply a (1x1)-matrix with a (4x3)-matrix; However, we can multiply a scalar with a matrix. This suggests a difference.  On the other hand, I was, for example, in an econometrics lecture today, where we had for a (Tx1)-vector $\underline{û}=\left( \begin{array}{c} û_1\\ \vdots\\ û_T\end{array}\right)$:     $S_{ûû}:= \sum_{i=1}^T û_i^2$ shall be minimized. We see see that   $S_{ûû}=\underline{û}^T\underline{û}$.   Well, formally, shouldn't it be $(S_{ûû})=\underline{û}^T\underline{û}$ or $S_{ûû}=\det(\underline{û}^T\underline{û})$, to ensure that we stay in the space of matrices and not suddenly go to the space of scalars? So here, the professor (physicist) not only treats $\underline{û}^T\underline{û}$ like a scalar, but also calls it a scalar. Is this formally legit or a wrong simplification (though it does not seem to have any impact, and surely makes life easier)? Ruby Style: How to check whether a nested hash element exists state that "at best" is an idiom. But, what is the grammatical function of "at best" (for example, in the below sentences?)        Their response to the proposal was, at best, cool.   The government's response seems to have been at best confused and at   worst dishonest.   If he drops the course now, at best he’ll get an incomplete, and he could fail.      Thanks Node Package Manager got corrupted in some way, now it cannot be installed I have four competing models which I use to predict a binary outcome variable (say, employment status after graduating, 1 = employed, 0 = not-employed) for n subjects. A natural metric of model performance is hit rate which is the percentage of correct predictions for each one of the models.   It seems to me that I cannot use ANOVA in this setting as the data violates the assumptions underlying ANOVA. Is there an equivalent procedure I could use instead of ANOVA in the above setting to test for the hypothesis that all four models are equally effective? VirtualBox - how to increase video memory? Showing that $f$ is linear function if $\forall z \in \mathbb{C}$, $|f(z)| \leq 1 + |z|$. Let $f$ be an entire function that satisfies $|f(z)| \leq 1 + |z|$ for all $z\in \mathbb{C}$. Show that $f(z) = az +b$ for fixed complex numbers $a,b$.    The hint tells us to try and use Cauchy's Integral Formula on an arbitrary circle.    This is my attempt: Consider an arbitrary large circle with centre $0$ and let $\Upsilon$ be the contour around this circle.    Then $$\int_{\Upsilon} \frac{f(z)}{z^{n+1}} \mathrm{d}z = \frac{2\pi i}{n!}f^{(n)}(0).$$    Note that $$\int_{\Upsilon}\frac{f(z)}{z^{n+1}} \leq \int_{\Upsilon}\left|\frac{f(z)}{z^{n+1}} \right|\leq \int_{\Upsilon} \frac{1}{|z^{n+1}|} + \frac{1}{|z|^n}$$ and the right hand side is $0$ by Cauchy's Integral Formula. I'm not sure if the first equality is valid, and not sure where to go from here. Radius of circumscribed circle of triangle as function of the sides Given the length ot the sides $a , b$ and $c$  of $ \triangle ABC$.  What is the length of the radius of the circumcribed circle?  After some formula substitution I came to the monster formula:  $$ \frac {a b c}{\sqrt{2a^2b^2+2a^2c^2+2b^2c^2-a^4-b^4-c^4}} $$  Can this formula be simplified? How to properly handle collision in a component-based game? Trying to wrap my head around the ways to properly handle collision in a game designed around components.  I see many examples have some sort of PhysicsComponent that gets added to the entity's list of components but the actual implementation is confusing me.  For this to work, the PhysicsComponent would need access to the world around it. This doesn't make intuitive sense to me. Shouldn't a component be unaware of not only its container (the entity), but its container's container (the world)?  To me, it sounds like the level or scene should maintain a list of these entities and every game update, loop through the entities to determine which collide.  My question is firstly, whether or not this is good design, and secondly, how to determine which entities can collide. I suppose solid entities could implement an empty IRigidBody interface so the level could determine which entities in the list support collision. But is this breaking the component design?  Instead, should they contain an empty RigidBody component? This may actually be better because it may not always be empty and this approach is more future-proof. The only problem with this is the complexity. The scene would have to loop through not only every entity, but also every entity's components to determine if it had this RigidBody component.  Thirdly, when they do collide both entities should be informed somehow and I am unsure on how to accomplish this either.  Let's say that both entities contained a HealthComponent and when they collided both their healths would be decreased by some arbitrary value, 5. I suppose it would be the scene's responsibility to handle this when it detects a collision between two entities?  But then is the scene responsible for too much? I could see this possibly getting out of hand and becoming unwieldy when the scene is responsible for many things entities should not (?) have access to.  Edit: Question updated with more details. How do I change permissions on a FAT32 formatted drive? What good are free groups? In , one learns two definitions of free groups associating with sets.        Let $A$ be a set, the free group of $A$, $F(A)$ is the initial object in the category $\mathcal{C}$, where \begin{equation} \operatorname{Obj}(\mathcal{C})=\{A\xrightarrow{g}G\}, \end{equation}where the codomain $G$ are groups, and \begin{equation} \operatorname{Hom}(\mathcal{C})=\{\text{Commutative Diagrams } A\xrightarrow{g_1}G_1\xrightarrow{\phi}G_2\xleftarrow{g_2}A\}  \end{equation} where $\phi$ are group homomorphisms.   Also $F(A)$ has the concrete construction with elements being non-redundant words with alphabet $A$, and the group multiplication being juxtaposition and reduction.      But what good are free groups? Why are they useful?  says they are useful in topology, but does not explain why explicity.   Can someone give some examples that an undergraduate can understand? I am asking about examples that can show the usefulness of this abstract construction. So I guess the identification of $\mathbb{Z}=F({a})$ does not really count. About the structure of ''There are/is'' I want to discuss the structure of ''There are/is''. First of all, what is the difference between:  There are three children.  and  Three children exist.  Do they have the same meaning? And secondly, In my native language, we would say that  Üç çocuk vardır.  &quot;Üç çocuk&quot; = Three children, &quot;var&quot; = existence (something  that exists, a being), and &quot;dır&quot; is a copula. So basically, this structure is not different from -for example- ''three children is a car''. ''a car'' and ''existence'' have the same function. But ın English, that structure that I have mentioned is confusing for me. I know that you are all used to it. Some can say ''What's the problem with that? It is just ''there are'' and ''there is.'' ''. I realize that I still did not ask a question. Well, let me try to ask a good one, I guess. Normally, ''there'' means a place where I am not in that place. Is there any relevance between ''there'' that means a place where I am not in that place AND ''There'' that is used in the structure of ''There are/is''? What kind of structure is this? By the way, I am new in English. Please excuse my naive usage of language. What do you think about it?