Cheated audit with faked tags? I've failed  audit on  question.  The problem is I've seen in my audit window something else as there actually is. The question in audit had  tag, while actually it has no such tag, and I should have never seen that question because of the tag filter in close queue.   I've chosen to close as unclear what you are asking because I couldn't see what that has to do with JavaScript.   Please don't add random tags to audit questions and expect us to take no action.
Audits bug in the filtered review queue Just recently the . I've got  this morning which seems to be out of scope for my filtered list. I have filtered my list to only review VBA and Excel-VBA tags while the audit is tagged with perl http pipes which have nothing in common with VBA. I see a problem with the way the system currently works  Since I have a filtered list of tags, once I see a differently tagged question I already know it's an audit. Come on, that's too easy!  Can this please be fixed? update I have ran into  which I decided to edit - the question was tagged VBA and I thought it had nothing to do with VBA so I selected Edit which was the correct action. Now, once the first audit was clearly one to close - nothing to do with VBA and really easy to know that it actually was an audit - the second one was a very good audit. I am just thinking now if this is a proper bug or just a matter of malfunction in the system. I think the first one may have been made an audit for the wrong reason. Let's turn this into a discussion as I can't clearly work the system out.
I'm porting a module that currently works with Blocks/BlockForms to Paragraphs/NodeForms. I'm inserting an embedded form inside a Paragraph inside a Node Edit page using a hook_field_widget_entity_reference_paragraphs_form_alter. The general structure where the form gets inserted is: $form['field']['widget'][0]['settings'][form here]  After this the form displays as expected on the node edit page. The inserted form goes through a number of #process steps. The element in question is a select form that when the button underneath it is pressed, is supposed to retrieve some data via a custom submit handler and place it on the page with ajax:  The array for this element looks like this:  You can see the custom submit handler that is supposed to fire when 'Select Segment Set' is pressed After debugging, I've found that the entire NodeForm appears to be submitted to the backend, and the only handler that is found is from some other field that uses ajax. In short 'updateSegmentSet' is never discovered as a submit handler. When I debug the original module based on block/blockforms, I do see the correct submit handler being discovered. Now in the latter case, of course a blockForm is submitted to the back end with the correct plugin. Given that this is basically a form within a form within a form, is there something special I have to do to get the custom submit handler to run? I've read a few things online e.g. the 'settings' key and '#tree' = true. EDIT The Ajax property looks like this:       '#ajax' =&gt; [         'callback' =&gt; [$this, 'updateSegmentSetAjax'],         'wrapper' =&gt; $wrapper_id,       ],    public function updateSegmentSetAjax(array &amp;$form, FormStateInterface $form_state) {     $button = $form_state-&gt;getTriggeringElement();     // Go one level up in the form, to the widgets container.     return NestedArray::getValue($form, array_slice($button['#array_parents'], 0, -2));   }  As best I can tell, this is never called either. I think this question is already answered anywhere, but I couldn't find a solution with my search terms :/ .  So I got this model and I only want to smooth out the cylinder parts, but not the extruded edges.  So here is my original model, I think it's kinda clear what should be smoothed out, it is supposed to become a rifle scope.    This happens with the normal smooth button, but I already tried it with a Bevel modifier and subdivison surface aswell.    Solution: Edge Split Modifier with Smooth: Version tags reloaded I'm getting sick of version numbers in tag names (aka version tags). Look,      I just want them all to be just . They are all about JSF. I browse and answer questions about JSF. I don't want to browse in all those different tags. I don't want gold badges for both  and . I can't hammer a duplicate  question because I don't have a gold badge for that. Across years I observed that a version tag is usually only picked by the asker when a &quot;relatively new&quot; or &quot;relatively old&quot; version is being treated in the question. When the &quot;currently mainstream&quot; version is being treated,  or when the asker is &quot;more proficient&quot; in the language, then askers often just pick the versionless . While moving in time, this may cause confusion by future readers when the version isn't explicitly specified anywhere in the question. I try to maintain them by adding/removing the version tag depending on its relevance, and by adding the versionless tag when it's absent. It only feels a neverending story. I'm sure other tag caretakers also have mixed feelings on this. I propose to normalize the version from the tag name:  Ban version numbers in tag names in the model (not in the UI). Add an optional single-choice version field to the Tag entity in the model. Users with edit privileges (no suggested edits please) must be able to change versions. Users with gold tagbadges must be able to add and edit versions. I'd imagine the version edit thing to be reachable via that tag info popover (when you hover the tag). Tags themselves however should look exactly the same, the version just separated with e.g. a hyphen from the tag name.  When in place, migration of existing version tags should be piece of cake. There's apparently already a script in place which recognizes version tags, it could be reused to re-match current tags and extract the version from it into the new version field. The alternative would be to automatically add the versionless tag when a version tag is being used. But this is IMO only tag pollution.  I'm posting this on meta.se instead of meta.so because version numbers aren't only on SO a problem, but on basically all HW/SW related sites. Is there a way to reorganize the fields/attributes in a data extension?  I've added some extra fields that relate to other fields in that extension.   I haven't found a way to regroup those fields. Part of a fingernail known as the  is informally known as the "quick".  It is referenced in the saying "cut to the quick".  What is the etymology of the word quick as in reference to the fingernail? Why is the plural of "basis" "bases" and not "baseis"? Looking at the , it indicates that the plural is either bases or baseis.  It looks like the rare  comes from the Greek, but the common  just refers back to basis and that does not explain the plural etymology.  Is there a standard rule at work here, or is this just an exceptional case that arose over time by convention? If you create a scene for the Video Sequence Editor and start working on a project Blender will render the output from the VSE. But if you want to later switch it to render your 3D scene again (the camera output) where is the setting to select the source?  Usually I keep a separate .blend for VSE edits so I don't need to switch, but I feel like I ought to learn how to do this as it's pretty basic. I would expect to find this in the Render context but I see no place to specify the source.  Thanks. Show that $|z_1 + z_2|^2 < (1+C)|z_1|^2 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{C}\right) |z_2|^2$ Let $z_1$ and $z_2$ be two complex numbers. Show that there exists $C &gt; 0$ with   $$  |z_1 + z_2|^2 &lt; (1+C)|z_1|^2 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{C}\right) |z_2|^2. $$   I tried to simplify the L.H.S and R.H.S, SNF I was finally left to compare between a real number and a complex number  I really couldn't think of anything else. Please help. LibreOffice toolbar icons went blank after application hanged How do I get transparency to work with the Principled BSDF shader? How do I get the Cycles Principled BSDF shader to support a base color image such as a 32bit png with alpha or a tga with an alpha channel, and get the transparency to work. I don't see anywhere on the Principled BSDF shader that handles transparency.  Without success, I have tried:   Properties Editor>Render tab>Film rollout>Transparent Properties Editor>Material tab>Settings rollout>Viewport Alpha (changing to other than Opaque). Adding a Transparent BSDF and Diffuse BSDF after the base color image node and using a Mix Shader to combine them. Numpy installation? I used VIRTUALBOX to install Ubuntu 12.04 on my windows pc. I used apt-get to install Python 2.7 that shipped with 12.04. I followed the directives I saw on this site to install Numpy, Scipy, Matplot all failed. I download tar source file of these modules. How do I install them manually? Someone pls help, I'm getting frustrated. Is this NPN transistor AND logic gate practical? How are the number of views in a question calculated? I saw it's not just a page views number, because, if I press F5 several times, it won't increase the number of views.  They could store my IP address in a table, but wouldn't that make it slow? They would need to query a database one more time for each request. Unable to Enter a Country If I have a connecting flight through a country I am unable to enter. Can I retrieve my bags to recheck for my connect? I would like to prove the following inequality, for $n=0,1,2,...$,   $$ \binom{2n}{n}\leq 4^n.$$ I already proved it by induction, and I'm looking for another proof. How are java.lang.Object's protected methods protected from subclasses? The keyword protected grants access to classes in the same package and subclasses ().  Now, every class has java.lang.Object as superclass ().  Hence I conclude that every class may access java.lang.Object's methods even if they are protected.  Take a look at the following example:   public class Testclass {   public Object getOne() throws CloneNotSupportedException {     return this.clone();   }   public Object getTwo() throws CloneNotSupportedException {     return ((Object) this).clone();   } }   While getOne() compiles fine, getTwo() gives   Testclass.java:6: clone() has protected access in java.lang.Object         return ((Object) this).clone();   I neither understand why getTwo() doesn't compile nor what's the difference (regarding the access of java.lang.Objects members) with getOne(). Proving identities (mod $pq$) using Fermat's little theorem? Why does $1+2+3+\cdots = -\frac{1}{12}$? $\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^s}$ only converges to $\zeta(s)$ if $\text{Re}(s) &gt; 1$.  Why should analytically continuing to $\zeta(-1)$ give the right answer? iPhone, reproduce the magnifier effect Is there a measurable set $A$ such that $m(A \cap B) = \frac12 m(B)$ for every open set $B$? Is there a measurable set $A$ such that $m(A \cap B)= \frac12 m(B)$ for every open set $B$?  Edit: (t.b.) See also  for further answers.