I used to use  to set my terminal colors to black on white from the command line as follows.  gconftool-2 --set "/apps/gnome-terminal/profiles/Default/use_theme_colors" --type bool false gconftool-2 --set "/apps/gnome-terminal/profiles/Default/foreground_color" --type string "#000000000000" gconftool-2 --set "/apps/gnome-terminal/profiles/Default/background_color" --type string "#FFFFFFFFDDDD"   Unfortunately, while the values are set when I run these commands in Ubuntu 15.10, the gnome-terminal colors do not change at all.  What is the correct way to set terminal colors from the CLI in 15.10?
At the onset of my live usage in Ubuntu Gnome 15.10, use a bash script to set the colour of my gnome-terminal. The code used is link=/org/gnome/terminal/legacy/profiles:/:b1dcc9dd-5262-4d8d-a863-c897e6d979b9 dconf write $link/background-transparency-percent '10' dconf write $link/scrollback-unlimited true dconf write $link/use-theme-colors false dconf write $link/use-theme-transparency false dconf write $link/use-transparent-background true dconf write $link/foreground-color 'rgb(0,43,54)' dconf write $link/background-color 'rgb(131,148,150)'  The last 2 lines of the code give a key-value error. When I look at the dconf-editor org&gt;gnome&gt;terminal&gt;legacy&gt;profiles:&gt;{Default profile} the attributes  foreground-color background-color  are unavailable. How do I get rid of the error? Note: When done manually via gnome-ternimal&gt;Edit&gt;Profile Preferences&gt;Colours&gt;Built-in schemes the above attributes appear in the same location in dconf-editor.
Local explanation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect in terms of force fields Here is an interesting paper for the Physics SE community:      On the role of potentials in the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Lev Vaidman. .  [quant-ph].   You should check it out because it's an amusing read, but I will summarise the argument to whet your appetite, assuming you have basic familiarity with the . In the traditional AB setup, one considers an electron in a superposition of paths, taking it in two opposite directions around a solenoid treated as a classical source of the electromagnetic field. The observable relative phase acquired between the electron's paths is attributed to the influence of the magnetic vector potential on the electron, which cannot be globally gauged away - despite the absence of a physical field anywhere along the electron's path(s) - due to a topological obstruction.  Instead, Vaidman considers the effect of the electron on the sources of the field, treating the latter as quantum particles. He shows that the relative phase between the two branches of the wavefunction can be considered as arising from the action of the physical field of the electron, which is not zero at the position of the sources. However, Vaidman uses highly contrived gedankenexperiments and completely semi-classical arguments, which begs a pair of concrete and related questions.  1) Can Vaidman's first, electric AB effect gedankenexperiment be described in a fully quantum manner, by solving (at least approximately) the three-particle Schroedinger equation? If not, why not?  2) Is it possible to explain within this formalism the experiments of Tonomura et al. (), who used a superconductor to completely shield the magnetic field of the source? How can I be a good reviewer? Someday, as strange as it feels to me right now, I might be asked to review an article for publication. A while ago my advisor and I were talking about this, and it hit me that I don't really know how to be a good reviewer, beyond the basics:   Respond timely to things, Make your report clear and detailed, Have actually read the paper, Etc.   Beyond this, though, I'm completely in the dark. So I'd like to ask:     What's some good advice for a first-time reviewer?   My field is math, but I'm really interested in general advice (although advice specific to math, or another field, would also be interesting and useful).    I'd like to make this question "community wiki" or analogous, but I can't seem to figure out how - if someone can do so, please do, and then I will delete this paragraph. I have to refactor a large C# application, and I found a lot of functions that are never used. How can I check for unused code, so I can remove all the unused functions? The definition of "Lie group" typically restricts to a smooth manifold.  If we instead define a "Lie group" to be a topological manifold such that multiplication and inversion are continuous, is the manifold necessarily smooth?  Is the smooth structure unique if we want a smooth Lie group?  I believe the answer is yes, since a connected Lie group structure is determined by the Lie algebra, but my search attempts failed. Prove that if $d$ divides $n$, then $2^d -1$ divides $2^n -1$ Prove that if $d$ divides $n$, then $2^d  -1$ divides $2^n  -1$.  Use the identity $x^k  -1 = (x-1)*(x^{k-1}  +  x^{k-2}    + \cdots + x +1)$ Double Range for Storm Sphere with Spell Sniper Spell Sniper says:     When you cast a spell that requires you to make an attack roll, the    spell’s range is doubled.   Can I apply that to the part of Storm Sphere that says:     Until the spell ends, you can use a bonus action on each of your turns   to cause a bolt of lightning to leap from the center of the sphere   toward one creature you choose within 60 feet of the center. Make a   ranged spell attack. You have advantage on the attack roll if the   target is in the sphere. On a hit, the target takes 4d6 lightning   damage.   The spell itself does not require the caster to make an attack roll. But there is the option to make a spell attack. I'm not sure if the Spell Sniper feat could be applied here.  Would the lightning attacks of the Storm Sphere benefit from the Spell Sniper feat? What is the isomorphism between the fields $(Z_2[x]^{<3},+_{x^3+x^2+1},\times_{x^3+x^2+1})$ and $(Z_2[x]^{<3},+_{x^3+x+1},\times_{x^3+x+1})$? General formula for evaluating integrals of the form $\displaystyle\int_0^\infty x^ae^{-bx}dx$ Prove that two distinct numbers of the form $a^{2^{n}} + 1$ and $a^{2^{m}} + 1$ are relatively prime if $a$ is even and have $\gcd=2$ if $a$ is odd.   My attempt: If $a$ is even, let $a = 2^{s}k$ for some integers $k, s$ Then, $$a^{2^{n}} + 1 = 2^{2^{n}s}\cdot k^{2^n} + 1$$ and $$a^{2^{m}}  + 1 = 2^{2^{m}s}\cdot k^{2^m} + 1$$ To prove that they're relatively prime, we need to show that their gcd = 1. And I was stuck here, how could I prove that gcd of two numbers is $1$?     A hint would be sufficient. Thanks. According to , $[0,1]$ cannot be written as union of countable disjoint closed sets, is the same true about (uncountable) family of disjoint closed intervals ? How to change an application icon programmatically in Android? has played the role of Wolverine as a major character in various X-Men films since 2000 and contributed highly to the brand of the X-Men movie series. But is he playing the Wolverine character for the last time in Logan?  I am getting to know from my friends that  is the last movie in which he is playing Wolverine and they all say that this is his last contracted film.  Are these rumors true? Is there any official information that confirms that this is Hugh Jackman's last movie as Wolverine? Proof of Frullani's theorem I want to build a flow to trigger an email when a date in one of the fields is nearing. I have a field named Payment due date. is it possible to trigger an email 2 days prior to the Payment due date. So that I don't miss the payment due date and payment is not delayed. Any kind of assistance is appreciated. Thank you very much in advance! I've been searching for a quantum algorithm to compute the the inner product between two $n$-qubit quantum states, namely $\langle\phi|\psi\rangle$, which is in general a complex number. One can get $|\langle\phi|\psi\rangle|^2$ through thte SWAP test for multiple qubits, but this is not really the inner product as the information of the real and imaginary parts are lost. I came across this , which claims that the task can be done by simply using CZ gates. I'm not sure if I am mistaken, but it seems to me that such a circuit works for computational basis states, but not for general quantum states. Could somebody help me confirm if this is actually the case? If the above algorithm doesn't work for general quantum states, what algorithm would you suggest? Are common cryptographic hashes bijective when hashing a single block of the same size as the output? Do I need to license fonts included with my OS? Hi I want to try Ubuntu 20.04 without installing it due to some driver issues in my laptop. But I already have 2 OS ( Windows 10 and Ubuntu 20.04 [Dualboot] ), so will trying Ubuntu mess with the already installed Operating systems? And I know how to make live usb and booting from it but don't know how to exit it and then bring my laptop back to normal. Tried finding procedure on internet but reliable results are not found. Providing command key-value arguments with commas in value When using commands that allow using key-value pairs, how can one provide an argument value that has commas in it? As an example, say I'm using the \newacronym command from the glossaries package as below:  \newacronym[firstplural = Alphas, Bravos, and Charlies (ABCs), plural = ABCs]{ABC}{ABC}{Alpha, Bravo, Charlie}   Unfortunately, the comma is used to separate key-value pairs so the Bravos, and Charlies (ABCs) portion doesn't get parsed correctly. Is there a way to overcome this? Is normal extension of normal extension always normal?