Google is telling me no but most answers are &quot;don't disable tabstops&quot; or telling end users to use the tabindex property, so figured I'd ask... Being able to disable tabstops with CSS would really simplify a solution I'm working on.  Any nifty tricks out there?  I don't want to remove anything from the document flow - just obscure them from the keyboard, as they're already obscured from mouse-interactions (specifically I'm working on our modal dialogs).  They may or may not be visible in the background. I have a JS solution already - just seeing if there's a pure CSS way to do it. Clarifications: *tabindex -1 is what the existing JS solution is doing.  Just seeing if there's a way to do this via CSS, as CSS solutions are always preferable when possible. *It's an accessibility improvement to remove obscured items from the tabindex - like when you open the save as... dialog in word, and it keeps tabs from wandering across all the other menus, keeping you in what you specifically opened.  The modals are to facilitate the page's use, not something like an unprompted ad.
I am using &lt;a&gt; tags for links on a web page. How do I disable the Tab key from selecting either of them?
If all motion is relative, how does light have a finite speed? I've often heard that Einstein shattered the notion of absolute motion (i.e. all things move relative to one another) and that he established the speed of light as being absolute. That sounds paradoxical to me; I cannot understand how the two concepts can be reconciled.  Before going further, I'd like to say: 1) Over the years, I've seen many layman's explanations on these topics (including the nice YouTube video by Vsauce, ). I understand everything that's said (or, at least, I think I do). Just nothing I've found seems to address this apparent contradiction. 2) More recently, I've tried to find the answer on my own. That includes searching the posts on this site. Some come close (), but nothing I've been able to find seems address specifically what I'm asking.  Back to the question: Relativity shows us that there is no universal frame of reference by which to judge motion, so object A might be reckoned as moving at 10&nbsp;m/s relative to object B or as stationary relative to object C. This is fine for me. I can grasp that the universe has no intrinsic coordinate system, that we only think that way on Earth because we have the ground to move over.  Then there's the speed of light (in a vacuum). The speed of light is the ultimate "speed limit," it's often said. But if there is no universal frame of reference, how can there be any such speed? The very idea only make sense if there is a universal frame.   If one object is moving (uniformly) at 60%&nbsp;c and another object is also moving at 60%&nbsp;c, but in the exact opposite direct, then from the perspective of either one (if they could still see each other) the other would appear to violate that speed limit. All these spacetime bending consequences used to explain why nothing can move past this speed only seems to enshrine the concept that there is some ultimate speed standard. If there is only relative speed, then the concept of light having a specific speed in the vacuum should be a nonsensical one since it having speed (x m/s) would only make sense when measured against some other body.   Since I was very young, it has always sounded to me like motion is only mostly relative, that until you get close to the speed of light, the effects of an absolute frame of reference are negligible. Perhaps that there is an actual fabric of space which everything moves relative to, which is why there is something to expand between galaxies (faster than light can propagate) in the metric expansion of space. Growing up, I always thought this would just start makes sense with time. Now I'm up to a first year (college) level in physics, I even know basic calculus, yet I'm still hopelessly confused.  EDIT:  Thank you to whoever suggested this may be a duplicate of . It and others are very much related and at least partially answer my question. Unfortunately, explaining that distances become shorter and time becomes slower as a way to stop you from exceeding the speed of light does not explain how that speed is not an absolute.  By my reckoning, if all speed is relative, then no matter how fast you go light should always race away from you at the same apparent speed. I.e. there should be no speed limit. For there to be a speed which you cannot exceed or you would catch up (and make time irrelevant) requires the very concept of some external speed by which light can travel and nothing else can reach - thus my logical paradox continues unabated. Is there a way to fake a dual (second) monitor Is there a way to fake a dual monitor for testing.    I have only one monitor and I have to make an application that is suitable for two monitors.  The second monitor screen should appear as a window on my primary monitor. I only occasionally use the Fixed Zoom In/Out buttons on the Tools toolbar of ArcMap and had always assumed that they zoomed in/out by a set scale factor.  However, using ArcGIS for Desktop 10.2, I just set my scale to be 1:10,000,000 and then hit the Fixed Zoom In button 10 times while recording the subsequent scale each time and was surprised to see:  10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,250,000 1,000,000   Dividing each scale denominator by its successor shows a sequence of: 1.25, 1.33, 1.2, 1.25, 1.33, 1.2, 1.25, 1.33, 1.2  Curious about what happened in between the scales above I experimented a little to discover that the first issuance of the Fixed Zoom In button simply takes the scale to the first of those listed above and then starts following the same pattern.  Try starting with 1:8,000,001 to see ...  8,000,001 8,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000   This seems like quite a neat solution, but not one that I had realised was in place - does anyone know if it has been documented anywhere?    I've looked in the Online Help without success.  In answer to @DevdataTengshe, the scales currently in my available list (see below) seem to bear no relation to those used by Fixed Zoom In/Out.    However, when I add 1:7,500,000 into my available list it does seem to insert that as an additional scale step ...  10,000,000 8,000,000 7,500,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000   This makes the algorithm being used even more mysterious to me. How can I get bold math symbols? To make Latin-letter variables bold I can use e.g. \mathbf{a}, but while putting Greek letters or symbols such as \nabla inside \mathbf doesn't cause any errors or warnings, it also doesn't do anything else.  What is the best way to make bold math symbols, in particular Greek letters and \nabla? Blending colors in photoshop and illustrator How to address a professor in letter? Is it possible to fail an ability check on purpose? Here are the general guidelines regarding ability checks:     The GM calls for an ability check when a character or monster attempts an action (other than an attack) that has a chance of failure. When the outcome is uncertain, the dice determine the results.   In some cases, you could want to fail an ability check. If you are climbing a wall an want to drop off, you fail simply because you stop attempting to climb, but in other cases, success and failure are both tied to the actual action and may both have desirable outcomes.  Example 1: Spell scrolls  An evil adversary wants you to cast a spell scroll for him, but you have him figured out and want to destroy his spell scroll instead, seemingly by accident. The rules on spell scrolls read:     If the spell is on your class’s spell list but of a higher level than you can normally cast, you must make an ability check using your spellcasting ability to determine whether you cast it successfully. The DC equals 10 + the spell’s level. On a failed check, the spell disappears from the scroll with no other effect.   A failure means that you successfully destroy the spell scroll.  Example 2: Amulet of the Planes  You are in possesion of the Amulet of the Planes. Your party is being overrun by terrible monsters, and the only way to save your party is to sacrifice yourself by sending yourself and the monsters to another plane of existence.     While wearing this Amulet, you can use an action to name a location that you are familiar with on another plane of existence. Then make a DC 15 Intelligence check. On a successful check, you cast the Plane Shift spell. On a failure, you and each creature and object within 15 feet of you travel to a random destination. Roll a d100. On a 1-60, you travel to a random location on the plane you named. On a 61-100, you travel to a randomly determined plane of existence.   By walking up to the monsters and failing the check, you and the monsters would be sent to another plane of existence.  The question  The rules seem to assume that you always want to succeed when you perform an ability check. Sometimes, however, you could want to fail on purpose. A sensible DM would rule that if you are skilled enough to succeed the check, then you would undoubtly be able to fail it on purpose as well. What does the rules as written say -- if anything -- about this circumstance?  According to RAW, is it possible to attempt an ability check and intentionally fail? Unfortunately, despite having tried to learn regex at least one time a year for as many years as I can remember, I always forget as I use them so infrequently. This year my new year's resolution is to not try and learn regex again - So this year to save me from tears I'll give it to Stack Overflow. (Last Christmas remix).  I want to pass in a string in this format {getThis}, and be returned the string getThis. Could anyone be of assistance in helping to stick to my new year's resolution?    Related questions on Stack Overflow: Let $T$ be a self adjoint operator on a finite dimensional inner product space. And let $4$ and $5$ be the only eigenvalues of $T$. Show $T^2-9T + 20I = 0$ .  proof:Let $T$ be a self adjoint. And let $4 , 5$ be the only eigenvalues of $T$. Then $Tv = 4v, Tv = 5v$ for some $v \neq 0$. Then $Tv = 4v, Tv = 5v$ if and only if $(T-4I)v = 0, (T-5I)v=0$.  Then $ (T-4I) (T-5I)v=0$ implies $(T^2 -5T -4T + 20I^2)v = 0$, implies   $(T^2 -9T + 20I)v = 0$, so we have  $T^2 -9T + 20I = 0  $. Can someone please check this? if it's not correct, could I please have some help on it? Thank you Are software titles italicized? The titles of freestanding works (books, movies, plays, albums, etc.) are italicized; smaller parts within these works (chapters in a book, articles in a magazine, songs within an album) are not (they are put in quotes, instead).  How are software titles treated?  My understanding is that if a particular program resembles a book or a dramatic work (like a video game), its title is italicized -- otherwise, it is treated as a proper noun, just like any other product.     I played Grand Theft Auto, instead of reading "Democracy in Ancient Greece" in Microsoft Encarta and preparing my presentation in PowerPoint.   Is this approach correct? What is the result of $ \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{ \sum^n_{i=1} i^k}{n^{k+1}},\ k \in \mathbb{R} $ and why? Proving $v(s,p)=2^{p-1}(2s-1)$ is a bijection of natural numbers and $f(s)=2s-1$ is a bijection between natural numbers and odd numbers. How do I prove this function is bijective? $$ v(s,p)=2^{p-1}(2s-1). $$ The domain is natural numbers and the codomain is also the natural numbers.  And this one: $$ f(s)=2s-1. $$ The domain is the natural numbers, and the codomain is the odd numbers in the natural numbers.  With this one I would do this to show it's injective: $$ \begin{align} v(s)&amp;=v(s_1)\\ \implies 2s-1&amp;=2s_1-1\\ \implies (2s_1)/2&amp;=(2s_2)/2\\ \implies s=s_1 \end{align} $$ So it's injective since if $v(s)=v(s_1)$ then $s=s_1$.  And to show it's surjective $f(s)=y$: $$ \begin{align} y&amp;=2s-1\\ \implies s&amp;=(y+1)/2 \end{align} $$ Then the function must be surjective since every $y$ is the same as the codomain for $f$.  Am I correct? I downvoted  and now really can't say why, so I wanted to remove my downvote. However, I get the message:  You last voted on this question yesterday Your vote is now locked in unless this question is edited  Why is this? I don't think I voted on it multiple times, and even when I did, I can change my mind, can't I? What does <<-EOC means? I'd like to know what the minus (-) and the EOC in the command below means. I know some languages like Perl allows you to chose any combination of character (not bound to EOF) but is that the case here? And the minus is a complete mystery for me. Thanks in advance!  ftp -v -n $SERVER  &gt;&gt; $LOG_FILE &lt;&lt;-EOC             user $USERNAME $PWD             binary             cd $DIR1             mkdir $dir_lock             get $FILE             bye EOC iPhone 6s with iOS 12.4 not connecting to MacBook Pro mid2015 with macOS 10.14.6 How can I test if a RegEx matches a string exactly?  var r = /a/; r.test("a"); // returns true r.test("ba"); // returns true testExact(r, "ba"); // should return false testExact(r, "a"); // should return true I read this book in the mid-nineties, probably written in the 80s or 90s.  It’s set in the near future, where the world has experienced a sudden glaciation.  Most of the United States and Europe is now covered with ice.  Civilization has collapsed for the most part. The protagonist is a drifter with strange-colored eyes (yellow, I think).  Because of his weird eyes, he’s never really fit in anywhere.  He moves from place to place just trying to survive, but somehow he discovers that the new ice-age did not occur naturally.  It was engineered by extraterrestrials, to make their work easier.  They’re looking for the plans for a super-weapon - a weapon that can cause any star to go nova.  A rival group of aliens hid the plans for this weapon by encoding the information in the human genome millions of years ago.  The marker to identify humans who carry this gene is - you guessed it - yellow-colored eyes. I have a collection of files and directories with strange names, they contain spaces and the special characters \, *, ), ( and ?. All of them cause problems when I try to use them in the command line or scripts, e.g.:    $ cd space dir bash: cd: space: No such file or directory  $ cat space file cat: space: No such file or directory cat: file: No such file or directory  $ cat ( bash: syntax error near unexpected token `newline'  $ echo content &gt;\ &gt; ^C  $ ls ? (  )  *  ?  \   How do I enter file or directory names that contain special characters in the terminal? do { ... } while (0) — what is it good for? Possible Duplicate:          I've been seeing that expression for over 10 years now. I've been trying to think what it's good for. Since I see it mostly in #defines, I assume it's good for inner scope variable declaration and for using breaks (instead of gotos.)  Is it good for anything else? Do you use it? What is the status of TTF support in Internet Explorer?