How do I separate this response in one variable, like I required from below response URL only in one variable? However, "BE050-A28" this value is dynamic in every response.  {   "vehicle": {     "BE050-A28": {       "url": "https://europe.com/iris/iris.jpg?COSY-EU-100-1713d0VXqNSFqtyO35PobzIDneWql9TQw2Mpxikzmxxom7ssM0uBRBbB2Z0iD%25W%25NZWm7ymWdhK0h8f%25v8%257EyLibLlYa4IG2rH"     }   } }  var responsePayload = Platform.Function.ParseJSON(Stringify(response)); var responseUrl = Stringify(responsePayload.vehicle.url); Write("responseUrl : " + responseUrl);
I have an issue which I've been struggling with today. The JSON is returned back to me with a project Id as the key, this Project Id is dynamically generated and due to this I have not been able to come up with a way to deserialize this response. Any suggestions?   {      "success":true,    "numRows":5,    "data":{         "23000079":{            "projectId":"23000079",          "name":"Mcdonalds",          "departmentId":"9383",          "responsibleUserId":"7444434"       }    } }
I have a Linux CentOS server, the OS+packages used around 5GB. Then, I transferred 97GB data from a Windows server to two folders on this Linux server, after calculated the disk usage, I see the total size of the two folders is larger than the disk used size.  Run du -sh on each folder, one use 50GB, the other one use 47GB  But run df -h, the used space is 96GB. (50GB + 47GB + 5GB) > 96GB  Is there any problem? Those two folders contain lots of files (1 million+). Thanks. Assume $T \in \mathbb{R}^{d\times d}$. Let $\rho(T)$ be the spectral radius of $T$ and $\rho \ge 0$. Prove that  $\rho(T) &lt; \rho$ if and only if there exists a $P \succ 0$ satisfying $T^TPT - \rho^2 P \prec 0$.  I can prove the Necessity: If $P = I$, for any $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$,   \begin{equation} x^T T^T P T x - \rho^2 x^T P x = \| Tx \|^2 - \rho^2 \| x\|^2 &lt; 0 \end{equation} so $T^T PT - \rho^2 P \prec 0$  I get stuck in proving the Sufficiency. Word style "keep with next" except on last item Should the site prompt new users to include an @name in comments? Light "diode" and 2nd law of thermodynamics If I had a light "diode" - an object that only allowed light (at least for a range of frequencies) to travel through it in one direction, would this necessarily allow violations of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?  Or would it be possible to restrict other properties of the device such that it could be okay.  Why I think it should violate 2nd law:   I can place such devices at temperature T in a bath of thermal radiation at temperature T, such that it forms a box which only lets the light in or out.  This would appear to always allow one to create a thermal gradient.  Once a thermal gradient is formed, useful energy can be extracted.  This seems to allow useful energy to always be extracted from a thermal bath and thus give perpetual motion. Release one such device at temperature T in a bath of thermal radiation at temperature T.  Since the photons are absorbed or reflected in one direction, and undisturbed in the other, the device will start moving.  It can use a thermal bath to directly generate useful motion.   Why I think I'm missing something and such a device could potentially co-exist with the 2nd Law:   The above arguments seem valid if the diode was only 'partially' rectifying as well.  However there exist sunglasses which largely reflect on one side, but not from the other side. Researchers have succeeded in using meta-materials to create a "blackhole" for microwaves.   Can anyone help sort this out? What's the term for using the wrong word because it sounds the same? I was reading about various terms for incorrect words, but they didn't seem to fit.  I saw a post where someone said "what do you like to do when you're board?".  That kind of thing.  Also, would that be considered a mistake in grammar?  I didn't think so, but my friend insists it is.  I'm not sure if there even is a word for that kind of mistake, but was just curious about it.  Thanks! I am using Microsoft Visual C++ on Windows and Qt Creator on Ubuntu. I can't change permissions on my flash drive (FAT32), even as root.  How can I change permissions on a FAT32 flash-drive? Usage and origin of "sister" in expressions like "sister company, sister ship, sister site" etc The term  is often  used figuratively  to refer, for instance,  to a “sister company” for a company  within the same group, or to a “sister  site” for  sites that belong to the same family. This connotation as explained by the   means:         belonging to a pair or group of similar and related things, such as businesses, usually owned or operated by the same person or organization:         our sister company in Australia.          also, from :        You can use sister to describe something that is of the same type or is connected in some way to another thing you have mentioned.    ⇒ ...the International Monetary Fund and its sister organisation, the World Bank.   ⇒ ...Voyager 2 and its sister ship, Voyager 1.       This usage appears to be common with things that are  regarded as feminine and are associated, as if by kinship,  with other similar things that belong to the same group. An early  usage example of this is the "sister" referred to  ships:         the US battleship Missouri and her sister ship, the Wisconsin.      In other instances,  the "feminine" issue is less explicit as in the case of internet sites, so I guess this usage has to do with the fact that English is less gender specific when it comes to things or abstract entities.   Questions:    Does “sister” apply to whatever entity that belongs to the same group irrespective of its real or perceived gender? or could "brother" be used instead?  Where does this usage come from? How would I prove that any binary tree that has n leaves has precisely $2n-1$ nodes ?  Given that a binary tree is either a single node "o" or a node with the left and right subtrees contains a binary tree        o  /       \ binary  binary tree    tree   Any help would be appreciated ! How do I programmatically log in a user with a POST request? How can I show notify-send messages triggered by crontab? How to select more layers with GIMP? In Adobe Photoshop I am able to select multiple layers at once with Shift+Click.  How can I do that in GIMP? If $m$ divides $n$, find a free resolution of $\mathbb{Z}/m$ as a $\mathbb{Z}/n$-module. If $m$ divides $n$, find a free resolution of $\mathbb{Z}/m$ as a $\mathbb{Z}/n$-module.   I have tried this one and got $0 \leftarrow \mathbb{Z}/m \leftarrow \mathbb{Z}/n \leftarrow \mathbb{Z}/n$.  The map $\mathbb{Z}/n \to \mathbb{Z}/n$ is multiplication by $m$, but I couldn't go further. Please help me. If posed with the subject question, given that I will not do the action in question, then what is the correct answer     No, I will not do it.   or      Yes, I will not do it.   #1 sounds better to me, but #2 is more logical. #1 sounds somewhat paradoxical in context of the question. Most descriptions of SIGTERM and SIGKILL point out that SIGKILL,     In contrast to SIGTERM and SIGINT, [...] cannot be caught or ignored [...] ()   Is this the only difference between SIGTERM and SIGKILL? In particular, if a process does not install a SIGTERM handler, is there any difference at all between sending SIGTERM or SIGKILL to the process? When I take the pth root, the bottom of the p comes very close to the \sqrt symbol.  In the New Century Schoolbook font (which I am using), the p actually intersects the \sqrt symbol, which looks even more terrible.  Is there a clean way to fix this?  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{fouriernc} % use the New Century Schoolbook font \begin{document} When I write $a^{(1/p)}$ as $\sqrt[p]{a}$, the bottom of the $p$ touches the top of the root symbol, which looks ugly. Even when the root symbol is larger, such as with $\sqrt[p]{\frac{1}{n}}$, it still looks bad (since the tail of the p almost hits that line). \end{document} Union of two vector subspaces not a subspace? $m$ doesn't come in the sequence $a_n=[n+\sqrt{n}+\frac{1}{2}]$ iff m is a perfect square Let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of positive integers defined by  $a_n=[n+\sqrt{n}+\frac{1}{2}]$  Show that a natural number $m$ doesn't occur in the sequence iff it is a square. How do I get an array of repeated characters from a string using LINQ? The future of meta.stackoverflow and meta.stackexchange Historically this site, , has been the place to ask questions about not just Stack Overflow, but the functioning of the entire Stack Exchange (2.0) network, including Area 51 and stackexchange.com and careers.  (Yes, there was a , but that dealt with the old legacy Stack Exchange 1.0 sites. It was deprecated a while ago, and currently redirects here.)  Now that we've gotten many, many months under our belt from the SE 1.0 days, I think it's time that we gave Stack Overflow its own, true per-site meta, and moved the higher level network meta discussions to meta.stackexchange.com.  Over time, it's begun to bug me more and more that requests for Stack Overflow, the site, kind of get buried here on meta.stackoverflow under the avalanche of network issues. Retag requests, synonym requests, things truly specific to Stack Overflow, the site, not the network. This is unfair to our vastly largest and flagship Q&amp;A site, and it's unfair to the Stack Overflow users to mix their requests in with network level concerns.  It's also odd that Stack Overflow is the only network site without a proper, dedicated per-site meta, where its meta has its own reputation system not tied to the parent site in any way.  This is mostly a quirk of history more than anything else, and I believe it is now an appropriate time to split into two sites:   , a proper per-site meta for Stack Overflow with integrated rep , a global network meta with its own reputation system   Yes, this will be painful. But I believe it is a good, necessary, and healthy step both for the future of the network and the future of Stack Overflow.  Some things to discuss:   which questions should be migrated from here to meta.so? Obviously site-specific things like the retag-requests, and perhaps questions with the  tag. Anything that is 100% wholly specific to Stack Overflow and not generalizable to the rest of the network should be moved over. This may be a pretty small, narrow list of questions, and that's OK. Should we do some meta spring cleaning in our transition? Which questions / tags should be blown away as no longer relevant, referring to ancient versions of Stack Overflow or issues that have long since ceased to exist and aren't instructive for any future visitors? Your meta reps will generally be unaffected, except insofar as we delete for spring cleaning, or move site-specific things to meta.so. We still plan to have a distinct reputation system for the new meta.se site, just like here.   I do not have a timeline for this change, that is up to Jarrod and David to decide. It may be months away. However, we feel pretty strongly that this is something that we need to do to clean things up and pave the way for the future -- so I expect it will happen in the next few months, giving us lots of time to decide how we want to do it, per the above.  Update  .