Wireless not working after installing Ubuntu 14.04 After installing Ubuntu 14.04 LTS on my Dell Vostro, wireless is not working. The "Enable Wireless" option is also missing.  I tried the command lspci -nnk | grep -iA2 net and got the following output:  08:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller [10ec:8168] (rev 03)     Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02bc]     Kernel driver in use: r8169  0e:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g LP-PHY [14e4:4315] (rev 01)     Subsystem: Dell Wireless 1397 WLAN Mini-Card [1028:000c]     Kernel driver in use: b43-pci-bridge   How to fix this problem?
Installing Broadcom Wireless Drivers I'm having serious problems installing the Broadcom drivers for Ubuntu. It worked perfectly on my previous version, but now, it is impossible.   What are the steps to install Broadcom wireless drivers for a BCM43xx card?  I'm a user with no advance knowledge in Linux, so I would need clear explanations on how to make, compile, etc.    lspci -vnn | grep Network showed:   Broadcom Corporation BCM4322 802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller [14e4:432b]      iwconfig showed:  lo        no wireless extensions. eth0      no wireless extensions.   NOTE: Answer below is updated every time new information is added and confirmed working.
I use dwm as a window manager on Ubuntu, I like tiled windows and I like them as few as possible. I sometimes need to run an application (let's say it's the pdf viewer mupdf in x11) from the terminal, the application will be launched in a new window but the terminal from which I launched becomes this prompt-less console for that application to log whatever.  I use dmenu to launch applications, but sometimes an application needs arguments (file names) to start. I use uxrvt within x11 managed by dwm. "Thought you'd never ask" is "I thought you'd never ask" with "I" omitted. "Hope this helps" is "I hope this helps" with "I" omitted.   In English grammar, normally every sentence should have a subject, right?   My first thought is that these two examples are so often used that they are like set phrases. But these are not really set phrases. You can alter the words after "thought" and "hope".  Another possible explanation is the tendency to drop the subject if it is the first person pronoun. It seems that in many languages, such as Spanish, Italian and Japanese, the first person subject is usually omitted. Maybe English is going the same way? (Not exactly the same, since in Italian, verb forms change according to the person, so the subject is not necessary to understand who one's referring to.)  And, apparently, such omission is more common in spoken English than in written English.  Are there more examples of such first person subject omission? How frequent is it? I have a product key for windows 8.1 (Single language edition or not that i can't remember). I have currently windows 10 pro installed.  I am planning to install windows 10 Home so i activate with windows 8.1 key.  So my question is will i be able to activate it if the Product Key is Windows 8.1 Single Language and i install Windows 10 Home(Multiple language edition) or vice versa. What is the point of the `cd` external command? Favorites improvements - search, categorize, personal tags, add note, favorite answer I'm a big fan of the favorites feature. I usually mark questions with good answers of code snippets for later use.  Most of the time I can't find the favorite I'm looking for so quickly as desired. I know I marked the question in Stack Overflow, but it takes time to find it again, because of the following reasons:   lot of favorites lot of answers for a question (last time I was looking for an answer in the question ) the question title is not always what I'm looking for   To make favorites more useful I suggest the following features to be added:   Allow to mark an answer as favorite Allow to tag questions with own tags (those tags are personal and can not be seen by others) Search function over favorites Allow to add a personal note to a question I want to build an uncountable well-ordered set within the theory $Z^\textbf-$. So, I take $A=\omega$ (exists by infinity axiom) and define $$W:=\{(X,R)\in\mathcal{P}(A)\times\mathcal{P}(A\times A):\langle X,R\rangle\ \text{is a well-ordered set}\}$$  With this I consider the set $T:=W/\cong$ (where $\cong$ is isomorphism relation). Note that $W$ and $T$ are sets by power set axiom. So I define for each equivalence class $[x],[y]\in T$ the order  $$ [x]\leq_T[y]\Leftrightarrow \text{type}(x, R_x)\leq \text{type}(y,R_y) $$  Here, $R_x$ means the order of $x$ that make it belongs to $[x]$.   So, $T$ is well ordered by $\leq_T$ and it is uncountable.  Question: I don't pretty sure if I can build $\leq_ T$ without replacement axiom. Another doubt is, Can I take the $R_x$ without AC? What is the best way to get a sine wave from a square wave? How can I correct a reviewer's opinion? My edit to an answer was accepted by two of the three reviewers, with the third rejecting with a claim that part of my edit was incorrect.  In fact, my proposed edit was entirely and demonstrably correct, and the reason given for rejecting is invalid.  How can I let that reviewer know about their error, and have them change their review to "Accept" - changing stats for both of us?  Please note:  This is not the same question as asking for an appeal of an edit that was rejected.  It's asking what I can do about one of the three reviewers, a dissenter who voted against my edit based on their incorrect information. Is the Moonbeam spell amazing, or are we doing it wrong? The description of the moonbeam spell (PHB pg. 261) says:  When a creature enters the spell's area for the first time on a turn or starts its turn there, it is engulfed in ghostly flames that cause searing pain... On each of your turns after you cast this spell, you can use an action to move the beam 60 feet in any direction.  We read this to mean a creature takes damage from moonbeam when any of the following conditions are met:  It begins its turn inside the moonbeam It enters the moonbeam on its turn The creature finds itself inside the beam on another character's turn, no matter how it got there  The creature will not take damage in the following instances:  A creature moves from one part of the beam to another (obviously it had to take damage, but it won't take more damage) A creature is in the beam after having been inside the beam already on that turn.  Following these assumptions, our druid cast a moonbeam and did damage to two enemies, Bob and Frank. On their turn, they took damage again, killing Bob. Frank left the beam. On the druid's next turn, she moved the beam in a circular motion, not exceeding 60 total feet of movement, and in the process the beam came in contact with a dozen enemies and ended on Frank. All dozen enemies received damage, as they were inside the beam at some point during the turn. On Frank's next turn, he again took damage for the fourth time and died. On each of the druid's turns, she moved the moonbeam around like this until the fight ended (it did not exceed the time limit and she made all concentration checks). Is this a legitimate use of moonbeam? It seems awfully powerful for a level 2 spell. The problem is this:      Suppose $I \subseteq R$ is a nilpotent ideal and there is $r \in R$ with $r \equiv r^2 \pmod I$. Show $r \equiv e \pmod I$ for some $e \in R$ idempotent.   I have spent a few hours rolling around in abstracta with no destination. I believe that if I could write down a concrete example of this, the example could guide me through the abstract definitions and show me where to look for an idempotent in $R$. I have looked at 2x2 matrices and could not find any such examples. Might anybody have one? Prove that $||x|-|y||\le |x-y|$ I've seen the full proof of the Triangle Inequality  \begin{equation*} |x+y|\le|x|+|y|.  \end{equation*} However, I haven't seen the proof of the reverse triangle inequality:  \begin{equation*} ||x|-|y||\le|x-y|. \end{equation*} Would you please prove this using only the Triangle Inequality above?  Thank you very much. What lens focal length most closely resembles the perspective of the human eye? I'm self-studying Guillemin and Pollack, but I'm stuck on Problem 3 of section 2. It says that if $V$ is a vector subspace of $\mathbb{R}^N$, then $T_x(V)=V$ if $x\in V$.  If $x\in V$, then since $V$ is a manifold, there is a local parametrization $\phi: U\to V$ where $U$ is open in $\mathbb{R}^k$. Without loss of generality, we can require $\phi(0)=x$. Then $T_x(V)$ is defined to be the image of $d\phi_0$ on $\mathbb{R}^k$.   An arbitrary element of $T_x(V)$ looks like $$ d\phi_0(v)=\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{\phi(0+tv)-\phi(0)}{t}=\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{\phi(tv)-x}{t} $$  but this doesn't seem very useful to show $T_x(V)=V$. What is the right approach? sample make file for creating more than one exe files with different directory Deploy Community Builder audience page assignments with ant migration tool? In Community Builder, if you create audiences and assign them to page variations, you cannot deploy these using change sets, according to .  In fact, Audience doesn't even appear in the list of change set components.  On the other hand, Audience metadata can be deployed using the ant migration tool, so I was hopeful that the audience assignments would also be deployable.  Unfortunately, I haven't had success in deploying any audience assignments, either for entire pages or for components on a page.  Has anyone found a workaround for deploying audience assignments for Community Builder pages?  I should say that I'm using the Build Your Own template.  If it can't be deployed, is there at least a way to get a list of audience assignments so I don't have to open every single page in the Community Builder to check?  Here's what I'm using in my package.xml manifest.  All the community builder page variations and all the audiences are created correctly, but the assignments are not.  &lt;types&gt;     &lt;members&gt;*&lt;/members&gt;     &lt;name&gt;Audience&lt;/name&gt; &lt;/types&gt; &lt;types&gt;     &lt;members&gt;*&lt;/members&gt;     &lt;name&gt;CustomSite&lt;/name&gt; &lt;/types&gt; &lt;types&gt;     &lt;members&gt;*&lt;/members&gt;     &lt;name&gt;SiteDotCom&lt;/name&gt; &lt;/types&gt; If $H$ is a cyclic subgroup of $G$ and $H$ is normal in $G$, then every subgoup of $H$ is normal in $G$. Exercise 11, page 45 from Hungerford's book Algebra.     If $H$ is a cyclic subgroup of $G$ and $H$ is normal in $G$, then every   subgroup of $H$ is normal in $G$.   I am trying to show that $a^{-1}Ka\subset K$, but I got stuck. What I am supposed to do now?  Thanks for your kindly help. Is it possible to plot a graph of any shape? How can I query SEDE for tags I've created? How can I query the  for tags I've created? How to get rid of banding in illustrator while using gradient? How to get Rid of Banding in illustrator while using Gradient Euclidean Algorithm for GCD of polynomials I am struggling to use the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials.  Given something like $$GCD(x^5+1, x^3+1)$$  I can easily use it as follows:   $$x^5+1 = x^2(x^3+1) -x^2 +1 \\ x^3+1 = -x(-x^2+1) + x +1 \\ -x^2+1 = (x+1)(-x+1)$$  GCD = x+1  But for something like $$GCD(2x^2+6x+3, 2x+1)$$   I cannot figure out how to do it using the same method. I start like this:  $$2x^2+6x+3 = x(2x+1) + 5x+3\\ 2x+1 = \frac{2}{5}(5x+3) - \frac{1}{5}\\$$  and I am not sure how to continue. Any help would be appreciated, sorry for my poor attempt at using LaTeX.