apple configurator 1.7 downgrade ios from 10 to 10 I am using apple configurator 1.7.2. Accidentally someone upgrade IOS to version 11 as image for every no ipod touch. Is any way I can go back to version 10? I need it for run older application which not support version 11 yet. Thanks for any help
Can I install any iOS version I wish by picking and choosing which firmware to restore? I'm trying to downgrade my iPhone from the current iOS to an older one, as per .  But every time I try, I always receive this error:     The iPhone could not be restored. This device isn't eligible for the requested build.     I have tried many times with and without DFU mode. Any ideas regarding this?
i want to add watermark on some videos but problem is because image in some videos its too small and in some videos its too big, (i think it depends on input link resulution)   so all my videos have output '640:360' so how can i make watermark image to be same in all videos not on some videos smaller in some bigger   ffmpeg -i "link" -i "/var/www/logo/logo1.png" -filter_complex 'overlay=10:10' -vcodec h264 -crf 25 -preset superfast -maxrate 600k -bufsize 600k -aspect '640:360' -s '640:360' .... I came across a list of functions in my calculus textbook whose indefinite integral cannot be found. It was written that the integral $$\int \frac{\sin(x)}{x} dx$$ cannot be evaluated without any explanation as to why.  I did some research over the internet and found out that the definite integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} dx$$ can be evaluated using Laplace transformation and is equal to $\pi /2$. But I still couldn't find answer to my original question. I read somewhere that the integral cannot be expressed using 'elementary functions'. A little help is appreciated, I'm in Calc 1 going advanced than my course but I am sorry if my post shows lack of research. Thank you! Is the Schrödinger equation derived or postulated? I'm an undergraduate mathematics student trying to understand some quantum mechanics, but I'm having a hard time understanding what is the status of the Schrödinger equation.  In some places I've read that it's just a postulate. At least, that's how I interpret e.g. the following quote:     Where did we get that (equation) from? Nowhere. It is not possible to derive it from anything you know. It came out of the mind of Schrödinger.    -- Richard Feynman   (from the Wikipedia entry on the Schrödinger equation)  However, some places seem to derive the Schrödinger equation: just search for "derivation of Schrödinger equation" in google.  This motivates the question in the title: Is the Schrödinger equation derived or postulated? If it is derived, then just how is it derived, and from what principles? If it is postulated, then it surely came out of somewhere. Something like "in these special cases it can be derived, and then we postulate it works in general". Or maybe not?  Thanks in advance, and please bear with my physical ignorance. In 1735 Euler gave the value of $\gamma$ as $0.577218.$ The constant is generally defined as the limit of the difference between the harmonic series and $\log n:~\gamma= \lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k}-\log n.$ Euler apparently relished this sort of calculation and must have taken quite a few terms to get such a good approximation.  My question is whether without a computer one can now prove that  $$\gamma &lt;  \sqrt{1/3}$$   with at least some savings in terms of the type of work Euler apparently expended? I don't think there's any point in raising the bar to $\gamma &lt; \ln 2\sqrt{\frac{23}{29}} $  because it seems to be the same sort of question.       My own thought was to compare $\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{1/3}\frac{dx}{\sqrt{x}}$ to something like $(-1)\cdot\int_0^\infty e^{-u}\ln u~du$ but I expect there's a better way. Execute vs Read bit. How do directory permissions in Linux work? What is proper way to update D8 DEV? In formal logic, how is it possible for an argument with a contradictory conclusion to be valid? I've recently been trying to introduce myself to formal logic, and I've hit a stumbling point:  In the text I'm reading, a valid argument is defined as "an argument in which it is impossible for the premises to be true and at the same time the conclusion false."  The text then later prompts me to declare whether it's possible for an argument to be valid with a contradiction for a conclusion. The answer key then claims that yes, it is in fact possible, but offers no further explanation. I'm also supposed to create an example.  I just can't wrap my head around this one.  Here's the example I've worked up, is this a valid argument?   If grass is green then it is raining.  If water is wet then it is not raining.  Therefore: It is raining and not raining.   My head hurts. Deleting Lines Containing a Specified String in Different Files Suppose there are two files in web/ named foo.php and bar.php. The 1st line of foo.php is "sdajgeSTRINGdsad" and the 10th line of bar.php is "gdfhu98324STRING". The task is to first locate these two files, then delete 1st line of foo.php and 10th line of bar.php given that the specified string is "STRING". Inconsistency in display of animated avatars It has been discussed previously that animated avatars are disliked because they cause a distraction from the content. However, currently animated avatars are not treated consistently.   On desktop, animated avatars are displayed as a still image, both in posts and on the profile page. On mobile, animated avatars are displayed as a still image in posts, but animated on the profile page.   I'm tagging this  because I'm guessing one of these two is unintended. Either avatars should animate on the profile page on both desktop and mobile, or on neither. (I sincerely hope that we are all agreed there should be no animation of avatars in posts.)  Example animated profile    This appears to animate on mobile, and show a still image on desktop (for myself and for other users who have tried).    I'd also like to hear arguments for and against animating only on the profile page, but the main purpose of this post is to clear up the inconsistency. Your answer is in another castle: when is an answer not an answer? I think we can all agree, this sucks:  If you've been around a little while, you've probably encountered hundreds of answers like this in various forums, some of them even marked as &quot;The Answer&quot; by well-meaning1 forum admins looking to close a thread. We could try to enumerate the commonly-observed problems with it...  Link is probably broken If link isn't broken, it's spam If link isn't spam, it's to some broadly-related resource that the answerer found by pressing &quot;I'm feeling lucky&quot; when googling the question's title.  ...but the real issue here is that we don't know! Even if the link was originally pointing directly to the most awesomeest answer ever for exactly the question being asked, there's nothing in the answer itself to even hint at what direction we're being pointed in. Strip the markup, and this is what you're left with:  i think you should take The tutorial HERE! This will help you a lot  Is there even one tiny speck of information there? No. Even the title of the page being linked to would have provided something to go on, but that was entirely too much work. So let me be clear: this sort of response is not an answer. If you see this, flag it. Moderators, if you see it flagged, delete it. There's really only one valid exception to this rule, and that's when the question is:  Suggest me some tutorials where i can learn quick.  Don't get me wrong, it's still a bad answer - but when the question is kinda asking for bad answers this is to be expected. Close or flag the question and move on - this is much more efficient than hanging around to babysit it by deleting every crap answer that inevitably shows up. If you're still reading, you're probably getting really bored by now. &quot;Gee, Shog - answers that contain ZERO information are terrible, horrible, very-bad things? What shocking revelations will you share next?&quot; Yeah. It's really simple... Except, . See, the problem is that once you step away from black-and-white &quot;answers / doesn't answer&quot; decision-making, things get... Interesting. And all those other answers with links in them See, this is an answer:  And so is this:  Yes, they're both very short, and yes, they contain links. But strip the markup, and you still get at least a little bit of useful information. Does that mean these answers should forever hang around the site? No, not necessarily - if it turns out they're just not that useful, they should probably still be removed - or at very least, down-voted so that they rank below other answers. Just remember: if the text of the post contains an honest attempt at answering the question, then it is an answer - so don't flag it otherwise, and if you do, don't complain if your flag gets declined. Answers &amp; Apples If you're still confused, forget about answers. Think about apples instead:  Answers are just like that, but less tasty in pies.  1 By which I mean to say, &quot;criminally lazy&quot; Forward vs Forwards In the inline math mode ($...$), if the formula is too long, LaTeX will try to break it on operators, e.g.  very long text followed by a very long equation like $a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l$ etc   may be rendered as  very long text followed by a very long equation like a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+ j+k+l etc   However, the break won't happen if they are separated by commas, e.g.  very long text followed by a very long equation like $a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l$ etc   will overflow the page like  very long text followed by a very long equation like a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l etc   How to make LaTeX able to insert line breaks after a comma too? Caption above subtables with subcaption package breaks numbering of following table I ajaxly call a route and pass data to it, In my controller, I want to get $_POST['var'] , $_POST['var2'], it seems because of using HttpFoundation in drupal 8, $_POST and $_GET are not exists in old method, How I can access $_POST parameters in custom Controller? What can be said about the convergence on $|z|=1$? I already found the radius of convergence of the power series $:$ $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {(-1)^n} {n} z^{n(n+1)}.$$ What happens at the boundary of disk of convergence?  I found that the radius of convergence to be $1$ and hence the disk of convergence is $|z|&lt;1$. Now I found at $z=1$ the series converges. Now how can I proceed? Please help me. Thank you in advance. What are best practices for blocking UI when application is busy Using a non-centralized structure for tex files - similar to \graphicspath If I press the "include alpha-button" in the Mix-Color-Node, I get white borders. Otherwise i've got a perfect alpha but no blue background. 554 5.7.1 : Relay access denied centos postfix I have problem in send mail from postfix in centos  I have following  for sending mail but I am getting error.  As in the link I tried following commands  telnet localhost smtp  Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mydomain.com ESMTP Postfix ehlo localhost 250-mydomain.com 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 10240000 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 DSN mail from:&lt;domain.com&gt; 250 2.1.0 Ok rcpt to:&lt;test@gmail.com&gt; 554 5.7.1 &lt;test@gmail.com&gt;: Relay access denied   Edit-1  In terminal this works  echo TEST | mail -v -s "Test mail" testing@gmail.com   my postconf -n shows belog information  alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases command_directory = /usr/sbin config_directory = /etc/postfix daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix data_directory = /var/lib/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 home_mailbox = Maildir/ html_directory = no inet_interfaces = localhost inet_protocols = all mail_owner = postfix mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq.postfix manpage_directory = /usr/share/man mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain mydomain = dummy.com myhostname = dummy.com mynetworks = all mynetworks_style = host myorigin = $mydomain newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.6.6/README_FILES sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.6.6/samples sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix setgid_group = postdrop unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550   What configuration I have to perform to send mails from my server. I'm writing a custom module for Drupal 8. It defines a field storage configuration object, in a file called modules/mymod/config/install/field.storage.bloom_stem.bs_twitter_ac.yml.  The problem is that this is not removed when I uninstall the module; it is apparently left behind because, when I re-install the module, I get a crash.   drush -y pm-uninstall mymod drush cr drush -y en mymod      exception 'Drupal\Core\Config\PreExistingConfigException' with message 'Configuration objects (field.storage.bloom_stem.bs_twitter_ac) provided by mymod already exist in active configuration'   So it seems I need to some how manually remove this configuration object. Do I need to provide some more code that deletes it when the module is uninstalled?