After a successful upgrade to 14.04, now when I am trying to login using administrator id, It loops back to login page and doesn't load my session. Even guest is not working. When I enter wrong password for administrator, it shows invalid password label.  File name ~/.xsession-errors show below error  Xlib:  extension "GLX" missing on display ":0". Script for ibus started at run_im. init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd main process ended, respawning init: at-spi2-registryd respawning too fast, stopped   Please let me know what should I do.
My Ubuntu is stuck in a login loop when trying to enter my desktop. When I login, the screen gets black and soon after that the login screen comes back.   I've read that the problem might be caused by an error depending on the graphics, here's my graphics card: ATI Radeon 7670M
"big enough to do this" My question is what is the difference among these three sentences.   He is big enough to do such  heavy works. He is not big enough to do such heavy works. He is small enough to do such  heavy works.   I am so much confused between 2 and 3.Also, I don't get what the 3rd one means. Looking for the proof of the lemma asserting that the conical surface (envelope) is a closed space. Thank you. How can I tell hotels exist that aren't on the booking web sites? There are a ton of sites out there to help book hotel rooms and to aggregate all the different sites to book hotel rooms. These companies make enough money to buy ads on TV, so I won't name them here. I normally poke around 3 or 4 of these as part of planning any trip.  I am now starting some very long term planning for a 6 week South Pacific trip, which includes undertstanding what hotels costs on some very small islands. I have paper guidebooks and I've been looking online. But I come across anomalies. For example, a place which has only 9 hotels listed on the sites I use, and prices range from $1000/night down to $200/night, then when I read the reviews on that cheapest one people are saying "it's nothing special, there are 5 or 6 places just like it here for half the price". Well, not on this site there aren't!  My guess is that many of these places don't have web sites, or don't have online booking, and therefore aren't getting into the aggregators. For some islands I have found local tourism boards with lists of "pensions" and such, typically cheaper than what I can find on the aggregators.    But how can I know? I don't want to assume that popular web sites represent reality, and choose only from places listed there. But I don't want to invest 10-20 hours of research per island only to discover the aggregators had everything. How can I know where the coverage is good and where it isn't, what kinds of hotels are more or less likely to be listed at expedia, trivago, booking, hotels, tripadvisor, and the like? (For example, I don't want to stay at a hostel, so I don't mind if they're not included in online sites.) Are there sites like wikitravel that list places without much of an internet presence?  I'm starting my research over a year before the trip, but wading through hotel pages is not the fun part of the planning so tell me how the smart people do it. Which metric to use to evaluate highly imbalance classification model performance I have to do classification model to predict the possibilities of person getting cancer based on certain attributes. The data is highly imbalanced. As per client requirement I have to report model performance based on any one of these 4 metrics AUC_Weighted normalized root mean square log loss Accuracy  Can you suggest me which one should I use? At  I've read that being $\sin(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n+1}$ by using  we get $\sin'(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(2n+1) \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}x^{2n}=\cos(x)$ but the page  says that if $f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_n(x-a)^n$ then inside the radius of convergence of the power series we have $f'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}nc_n(x-a)^{n-1}$ so shouldn't it be $\sin'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(2n+1)\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n+1-1}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}x^{2n}$?  Now I understand that this last result has a missing term due to the index of the series being $1$ and not $0$ but being the $1$ mandatory because of the above theorem and since trying to shift index doesn't help (we get $\sin'(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{(2n+2)!}x^{2n+2}$) how can the result that ProofWiki shows be rigorously justified?   (I mean, I think we can't just say "oh, there's a missing term!" after having applied the theorem and magically shift the index of the series to obtain the desired result) I have two LED lamps in my corridor, and when I switch them off, they keep emitting light (not very strong, but it's annoying at night).  What can it be? How can I fix it? Are the various "Zelda" games supposed to take place in a common universe? Why do I have to solve for $x$ in this proof, if I choose not to find a counterexample? For what values of $\alpha$, does this integral converge? For what values of $\alpha&gt;0$ this integral converges $$\int_0^{\infty} \frac {\sin x}{x^{\alpha}}dx $$ How do you judge the quality of a journal? Salesforce1 on focus scroll to the top math fallacy problem: $-1= (-1)^3 = (-1)^{6/2} = \sqrt{(-1)^6}= 1$? Are vacuum fluctuations really happening all the time? In popular physics articles and even some physics classes I've been to, the vacuum of space is described as being constantly full of quantum fluctuations.  Supposedly, all sorts of particle-antiparticle pairs at all scales are constantly appearing and disappearing.  We end up with a mental image of the vacuum as a roiling, choppy sea with all sorts of things going on, rather than a calm, placid background.  However, the vacuum, being the lowest-energy state of a theory, should be an energy eigenstate—which means it is time-invariant (except for a physically-irrelevant phase factor).  So it seems the vacuum really should not be seen as a dynamic entity with all kinds of stuff happening in it, as we're led to believe.   that     A “vacuum fluctuation” is when the ground state of a system is measured in a basis that does not include the ground state; it’s merely a special case of a quantum fluctuation.   So it sounds as if the existence of vacuum fluctuations is contingent on measuring the vacuum—in particular, measuring something that doesn't commute with energy (such as, I guess, the value of a field at a point).  How much truth is there to the idea that vacuum fluctuations are constantly happening everywhere, all the time?  Is that really a useful way to think about it, or just a myth that has been propagated by popularizations of physics? Careers - Search Book JS error Proof that Limit of the Log is the Log of the Limit Proof that Limit of the Log is the Log of the Limit. What is the intuition behind this statement? Onguard U-lock jammed I'm currently trying to unlock my bike that has been sitting on my porch for a while, the key works and turns, and I can hear the lock engaging/disengaging, however I cannot get the shackle to come out. I think their might be dust/sand stuck in the mechanism however I'm not sure how to get it off now to check. Add a way for moderators to cast a normal, non binding close/open vote I think moderators should have the ability to cast a normal, non binding close and open vote like they were a normal user (while of course retaining their ability to cast a binding vote where necessary). This can be used in &quot;grey areas&quot; where a moderator can choose to give his or her opinion, but not make a decision alone; a good example of this is . This also helps in areas not so grey (questions that everyone would agree should be closed) since the OP has the time to see close (1) and possibly edit his or her question. The moderator can then optionally come back after a few minutes and close it for real if it's not improved (or maybe during that time other 4 people voted to close it). This would also fit perfectly in :  Since we’re about to add community moderators on both Stack Overflow and Server Fault, I need to document what it is, exactly, we expect moderators to do. The short answer is, as little as possible! No group of order 200 is simple Show that any group of order 200 is not a simple group.   I have started with the sylow 5-subgroup, but the sylow 2 subgroups i found that they are 25 subgroup but i couldnt proceed in the proof any more! Please help. Using Zorn's lemma show that $\mathbb R^+$ is the disjoint union of two sets closed under addition. Error: MIXED_DML_OPERATION on setup and non-setup objects