I'm trying to understand how the this keyword works in this context.  function Person(name) {     this.name = name;     this.sayName = function() {         alert('My name is ' + this.name);     }; }   var p = new Person('Smith'); p.sayName();  // 'My name is Smith'  var q = p;  q.sayName();  // 'My name is Smith'  q = p.sayName;  q();  // 'My name is'   ???   Why is the last example not picking up 'Smith'?    Is it because q is simply pointing to a function (i.e. the object the method belongs to is not recognized in this context)? Since q is in the global space, this is global within the function (i.e. the caller of sayName() is the global space or window)?
In JavaScript, the "this" operator can refer to different things under different scenarios.   Typically in a method within a JavaScript "object", it refers to the current object.  But when used as a callback, it becomes a reference to the calling object.  I have found that this causes problems in code, because if you use a method within a JavaScript "object" as a callback function you can't tell whether "this" refers to the current "object" or whether "this" refers to the calling object.  Can someone clarify usage and best practices regarding how to get around this problem?     function TestObject() {             TestObject.prototype.firstMethod = function(){                       this.callback();                       YAHOO.util.Connect.asyncRequest(method, uri, callBack);              }              TestObject.prototype.callBack = function(o){               // do something with "this"               //when method is called directly, "this" resolves to the current object               //when invoked by the asyncRequest callback, "this" is not the current object               //what design patterns can make this consistent?               this.secondMethod();             }             TestObject.prototype.secondMethod = function() {              alert('test');             }         }
Difference between "@id/" and "@+id/" in Android Why should the substitution be injective when integrating by substitution? I made a silly mistake in evaluating some integral by using a non-injective $u$-substitution.  But why should $u$-substitutions be injective in the first place?  I reasoned in the following way: the formula $$ \int_{\phi(a)}^{\phi(b)}g(x)\ dx = \int_a^b g(\phi(t))\phi^\prime(t)\ dt $$ holds for a general $C^1$ function $\phi$, even if it is not injective.  When you calculate an integral of the form $\int_a^b f(\phi(t))\ dt$, to use the formula above from right to left, you should find a function $f$ such that $$ f(\phi(t)) = g(\phi(t))\phi^\prime(t), $$ which do not exist if $\phi$ is not injective, i.e., $\phi(t) = 0$ for some $t$. This is why substitutions should be injective.  Is my reasoning correct?  If so, I believe that if $\phi^\prime(t) = 0 \Rightarrow f(\phi(t)) = 0$, a function $g$ that satisfies the formula above may exist and $\phi$ should not necessarily be injective.  Is this right?  I am often confused about the fact $\phi$ should be injective.  Is there an intuitive way to interpret this fact, so that I always remember to take a $\phi$ that is injective?  I would be grateful if you could help me understand this matter. What does standard deviation tell us in non-normal distribution In a normal distribution, the  imparts standard deviation a lot of meaning, but what would standard deviation mean in a non-normal distribution (multimodal or skewed)? Would all data values still fall within 3 standard deviations? Do we have rules like the 68-95-99.7 one for non-normal distributions? CSS 100% height with padding/margin With HTML/CSS, how can I make an element that has a width and/or height that is 100% of it's parent element and still has proper padding or margins?  By "proper" I mean that if my parent element is 200px tall and I specify height = 100% with padding = 5px I would expect that I should get a 190px high element with border = 5px on all sides, nicely centered in the parent element.  Now, I know that that's not how the standard box model specifies it should work (although I'd like to know why, exactly...), so the obvious answer doesn't work:  #myDiv {     width: 100%     height: 100%;     padding: 5px; }   But it would seem to me that there must be SOME way of reliably producing this effect for a parent of arbitrary size. Does anyone know of a way of accomplishing this (seemingly simple) task?  Oh, and for the record I'm not terribly interested in IE compatibility so that should (hopefully) make things a bit easier.   EDIT: Since an example was asked for, here's the simplest one I can think of:  &lt;html style="height: 100%"&gt;     &lt;body style="height: 100%"&gt;         &lt;div style="background-color: black; height: 100%; padding: 25px"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;     &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt;   The challenge is then to get the black box to show up with a 25 pixel padding on all edges without the page growing big enough to require scrollbars. How to add an image to a JPanel? I have a  to which I'd like to add JPEG and PNG images that I generate on the fly.  All the examples I've seen so far in the , specially in the  use ImageIcons.  I'm generating these images as byte arrays, and they are usually larger than the common icon they use in the examples, at 640x480.   Is there any (performance or other) problem in using the ImageIcon class to display an image that size in a JPanel? What's the usual way of doing it? How to add an image to a JPanel without using the ImageIcon class?   Edit: A more careful examination of the tutorials and the API shows that you cannot add an ImageIcon directly to a JPanel. Instead, they achieve the same effect by setting the image as an icon of a JLabel. This just doesn't feel right... I need an approach to allow delegated admins (i.e., non-Administators) to add members to Public Groups and Collaboration Groups (the GroupMember and CollaborationGroupMember objects).  I added a custom object (UserGroupRequest__c) to capture which Users should be added/removed to which Groups.    I've also built a batchable class to process the requests.  However, GroupMember is a Setup object, and CollaborationGroupMember is not.  So this doesn't work if I combine the operations in a single batchable class.  Should I instead be using 2 batch classes, calling one from the finish method of the other?    Any recommendations on how best to proceed?  Am I way off base?    Would a trigger on the Request object perhaps be better? I'm guessing that there may be a permission problem if this is attempted via a trigger as the delegated admins won't be able to add users to public Groups.  Also, I'm guessing the trigger approach would run into the same mixed DML issue - on Insert of the Custom object, I would need to Insert/Delete from GroupMember and from CollaborationGroupMember, and then perform a 2nd update on the Custom object to indicate that processing was completed... I'm thinking of running a Pathfinder campaign for Skype (text only) and I don't have a group of players. How can I go about recruiting people for play-by-chat games instead of in-person? Are there any online sites in which you can look for people that are looking to play in an online play-by-chat RPG Campaign? how do you make clothes move along with your model? Do you rig the model first and then parent it to the body of the character then click cloth simulation? I am a little bit confused with the process. Thanks for the help. Euclidean domain in which the quotient and remainder are always unique Let $R$ be a Euclidean domain in which the quotient and remainder are always unique. Does it follow that the ring $R$ is either a field or a polynomial ring $F[X]$ for some field $F$? Test to see if the title length requirement can be circumvented by appending lots of dots. Position vs Part Intuitive explanation for density of transformed variable? Suppose $X$ is a random variable with pdf $f_X(x)$. Then the random variable $Y=X^2$ has the pdf   $$f_Y(y)=\begin{cases}\frac{1}{2\sqrt{y}}\left(f_X(\sqrt{y})+f_X(-\sqrt{y})\right) &amp; y \ge 0 \\ 0 &amp; y \lt 0\end{cases}$$   I understand the calculus behind this. But I'm trying to think of a way to explain it to someone who doesn't know calculus. In particular, I'm trying to explain why the factor $\frac{1}{\sqrt{y}}$ appears out front. I'll take a stab at it:  Suppose $X$ has a Gaussian distribution. Almost all the weight of its pdf is between the values, say, $-3$ and $3.$ But that maps to 0 to 9 for $Y$. So, the heavy weight in the pdf for $X$ has been extended across a wider range of values in the transformation to $Y$. Thus, for $f_Y(y)$ to be a true pdf the extra heavy weight must be downweighted by the multiplicative factor $\frac{1}{\sqrt{y}}$  How does that sound?  If anyone can provide a better explanation of their own or link to one in a document or textbook I'd greatly appreciate it. I find this variable transformation example in several intro mathematical probability/stats books. But I never find an intuitive explanation with it :( Is there really no way to power a DSLR by USB? Eclipse was working as good as anything on 14.04. I did a clean install of 16.04 and installed Eclipse. But it runs a Java program only once after which it just hangs during subsequent attempts before I remove and reinstall it. I have tried many things, since in the beginning I needed CDT as well. Right now, I just want to remove everything related to eclipse and do a fresh install (remove all the configs and dependencies). Please note that I used Eclipse installer to install Eclipse and the eclipse icon image is also not appearing (the default ubuntu ? is appearing). How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral? In the past, I've come across statements  along the lines of &quot;function $f(x)$ has no closed form integral&quot;, which I assume means that there is no combination of the operations:  addition/subtraction multiplication/division raising to powers and roots trigonometric functions exponential functions logarithmic functions  which when differentiated gives the function $f(x)$. I've heard this said about the function $f(x) = x^x$, for example. What sort of techniques are used to prove statements like this? What is this branch of mathematics called?  Merged with &quot;&quot; by : Sometimes we are told that some functions like $\dfrac{\sin(x)}{x}$ don't have an indefinite integral, or that it can't be expressed in term of other simple functions. I wonder how we can prove that kind of assertion? If $G$ is cyclic, then $G/H$ is cyclic?   The proof I got goes like this: $G$ is cyclic, so $G=&lt;g&gt;$ for some $g\in G$. So any coset in $G/H$ would be of the form $Hg'=Hg^n$ for some $n$. So $Hg$ is an generator of $G/H$. Thus, $G/H$ is cyclic.  I might just be confusing myself, but we have only shown that $Hg'$ is in form of $(Hg)^n$. But what if we are missing some $n\in\mathbb{N}$? That is, there is no quotient group of the form $Hg^2$, for example.  To make myself a little bit clearer, I think what the above proof has done was showing that $\forall Hg'\in G/H, Hg'\in &lt;Hg&gt;$, thus $G/H \subset &lt;Hg&gt;$. I feel that this is not a complete proof. Operators can be cyclically interchanged inside a trace: $${\rm Tr} (AB)~=~{\rm Tr} (BA).$$ This means the trace of a commutator of any two operators is zero: $${\rm Tr} ([A,B])~=~0.$$ But what about the commutator of the position and momentum operators for a quantum particle? On the one hand: $${\rm Tr}([x,p])~=~0,$$ while on the other hand: $$[x,p]~=~i\hbar.$$ How does this work out? How can I get back to Blender's default theme? Even though I am relatively new to Blender I am recording a tutorial for a Blender exporter. I have been advised that I should use the Default colour scheme (for the UI). I have no idea which one that is. Can anyone tell me? Additional horizontal space when the last line of an environment is full I have created an environment env which just adds a \medskip and some text (say "Blablabla") after the text inside \begin{env} ... \end{env}. The problem is that if the last line is full, then I get an additional horizontal space between the text and "Blablabla".  Here is an MWE:  \documentclass{article} \newenvironment{env}{ ENVIRONMENT:\par }{ \medskip \par\noindent Blablabla }  \begin{document}  \section*{First case: the last line is not full}  \begin{env} Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla malesuada porta tortor non vestibulum. Vivamus vel tincidunt purus. Curabitur quam arcu, suscipit sed diam sed, ornare efficitur felis. Duis at arcu iaculis, viverra ligula sit amet, hendrerit eros. Proin finibus venenatis sollicitudin. Nunc ullamcorper sem ut lacinia posuere. Integer pulvinar nulla lorem, ut pulvinar ipsum egestas at. Duis quam ipsum, posuere ac pulvinar vitae, auctor non leo. \end{env}  \section*{Seconde case: the last line is full}  \begin{env} Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque suscipit vitae neque eu gravida. Quisque et enim quam. Integer elementum diam a ex laoreet, ac egestas lacus volutpat. Nunc ullamcorper non urna tincidunt ultrices. Etiam eu ultricies diam. Proin mollis, nunc sit amet volutpat varius, ipsum tellus bibendum nulla, in eleifend lacus felis pellentesque nisl. Phasellus laoreet, libero quis auctor congue, nulla nulla aliquam metus, in hendrerit arcu justo quis tortor. Nunc nec nisi euismod, consectetur tellus nec, suscipit libero.  \end{env}  \end{document} Anthology for children; contains story about friendly Martian on postapocalyptic Earth I'm looking for the title of an anthology of children's science fiction stories from the 1950s. The best of the bunch involved a Martian who visited earth, and realized we'd blown ourselves up in a nuclear war and had fallen into savagery. The Martian is a vegetarian who subsists on biscuits made by a machine he brought with him, and communicates by using one of his tentacles to feed messages direction to/from the brain of the person he's talking to.  Inadvertently left behind by his expedition, he initially befriended some children, and eventually managed to rebuild civilization. Presently he dies, but when another expedition comes a generation later, they find the civilization he rebuilt.  there were other stories, but that was the best one.   If I can't find the name of the book it was in, I'd be happy to settle for the name of the author and the title of the story.