Copyright website I have developed my first website and ready to publish to the internet. I'm confused with how the COPYRIGHT under the footer works? Do I just ...   Show COPYRIGHT WEBSITE NAME at the footer? Not showing anything? Register my copyright before showing?    I have read so many posts discussing about the copyright, I'm still confuse. As different source seems to give different answer  (Example, you need to register copyright with $35, you don't need copyright, etc..)  By far,  seems to be accepted by most. Can I confirm this is true?     You automatically have the copyright to any work you create.   Meaning that, I can simply just add my COPYRIGHT WEBSITE NAME in my website without any registration?
How do I copyright my website? My website has been in development for a long time and cost a lot of money.  How do I go about securing an enforceable copyright on my website design and what is the proper way to post a copyright notice on the site so others know the work is copyrighted?
Defining the Complex numbers I posted this question nearly 10 days ago, but am still really not satisfied with the answers I got, I have no prior education in abstract algebra, group theory, or other abstractions, and most of the answers I got involved defining sets, groups and other things I am unfamiliar with, my question was,  How does one know the notion of real numbers is compatible with the axioms defined for complex numbers, ie how does one know that by defining an operator '$i$' with the property that $i^2=-1$, we will not in some way contradict some statement that is an outcome of the real numbers.  For example if I defined an operator x with the property that $x^{2n}=-1$, and $x^{2n+1}=1$, for all integers n, this operator is not consistent when used compatibly with properties of the real numbers, since I would have $x^2=-1$, $x^3=1$,thus $x^5=-1$, but I defined $x^5$ to be equal to 1.  How do I know I wont encounter such a contradiction based upon the axioms of the complex numbers.  I reiterate here again, Please don't use terminology, or abstract math, that hasn't been taught in say a thorough collage level calculus 1 course.  Here's a link to the same question I asked 8 or so days ago: Sudoers blacklist These two exercises I encountered recently seem to develop some type of connection between GCD and LCM I can't quite figure out. Exercise 1:  Find all the numbers $x$ and $y$ such that: $a) \ GCD(x,y)=15, \ LCM(x,y)=150$ $b) \ GCD(x,y)=120 \ LCM(x,y)=1320$ $c) \ GCD(x,y)=100 \ LCM(x,y)=990$  Exercise 2:   Find all the numbers $m,n$ such that $GCD(m,n)=pq , \ LCM(m,n)=p^2qs$  where $p,q,s$ are prime  The first thing that is known to me is that $GCD(x,y) \cdot LCM(x,y)= x \cdot y$ Also $LCM(x,y)$ is at most $x \cdot y$ while $GCD(x,y)$ is at most $\max \{x,y\}$. Last thing is that $GCD(x,y)|LCM(x,y)$. Using all this I tried to solve the first exercise: $a)$ First two obvious pairs are $x=15, y=150$ and $y=15, x=150$. Now neither of the numbers can be bigger than $150$ or smaller than $15$. So we are looking for numbers in the range $15-150$ that satisfy $x \cdot y = 15 \cdot 150$ Another such pair is $(x,y)=(30,75), \ (x,y)=(75,30)$. Similarly for $b)$ we find that the only possible values are permutations of the set {$120,1320$} and in $c)$ since $100$ does not divide $990$ no such numbers exist. Now exercise 2 is what made me think there is actually another connection I'm not quite aware of since now it's about arbitrary prime numbers and the previous method doesn't work anymore. My intuition is that it has something to do with $GCD$ or $LCM$ of the $GCD(x,y), \ LCM(x,y)$ From time to time, I need to typeset Welsh. Sometimes, I need to typeset citations and bibliographies in Welsh. I think that last time I did this, I may still have been using BibTeX although I am honestly not sure. In any case, my entire work-flow now uses biber and biblatex...  I found  on changing the names of things, including the names of things used by biblatex. However, that cannot deal with the case of an unsupported language.  Suppose that I want to typeset a document in Welsh:  \documentclass[a4paper,welsh]{article}  \usepackage{babel} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}% welsh needs utf8x but biblatex doesn't like it \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}% not great for Welsh but the best pdfTeX can do \usepackage{csquotes}% doesn't like Welsh though biblatex likes csquotes on account of babel... \usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex} \bibliography{biblatex-examples}  \title{Fy Nogfen} \author{Rhywun}  \begin{document}   \maketitle   \tableofcontents   \section{Cyntaf}   \autocite{westfahl:space}    \printbibliography  \end{document}   There are multiple problems in such a case. (One is that I need utf8x but can't use it on account of biblatex. Another is that I need utf8x at all. Another is that biblatex likes csquotes but csquotes doesn't do Welsh. But these are irrelevant to this question.)  The output is as follows:    Note that the use of the English citation is just so this is easy to reproduce. Obviously, the content of the reference might well be in Welsh. (Though it might be in English, too.)  As can be seen, while elements of the document controlled by babel are handled correctly, those under the control of biblatex are not. However, I cannot simply modify the solution offered by lockstep for changing strings to customised English variants. That is, I can't just use a Welsh version of  \DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%   bibliography = {Works Cited},   references = {Works Cited}, }   because biblatex has never heard of it.  What is the most appropriate way to configure biblatex for use with an unsupported language? Is there a term for coining a phrase for a word that already exists? I hope someone can help me.  I am currently on holiday for 3 months in America under the Visa Waiver Program and would like to stay an extra 2 or 3 weeks. I know I will have to leave the country, renew my visa waiver and then reenter and so wanted to know if I will have an issue reentering.  I will only be out of the country for about 24 to 48 hours, just enough to renew the visa and get on a plane. I understand it is up to the border control person on the day, but does anyone think I will have an issue?? Where are packages stored installed with APT in Ubuntu 16.04? Number of connected components of the complement of a compact Let $X$ be a connected, locally compact space and let $K$ be a compact subset of $X$. Is the number of connected components of the complement $X\setminus K$ finite? If it is not, are there some hypotheses over $X$ for finiteness of connected components? sql ORDER BY multiple values in specific order? I'm a 16-year-old male, and I have been interested in tabletop RPGs for a long time, especially D&amp;D. I sorta dove into D&amp;D really fast and hard by buying the Red box, Dungeon Master Kit, Monsters Vault, Players Handbook, Rules book, and even the Shadowfell Campaign not quite knowing what I'd get myself into. I've done tooonnsss of research and even watched live games on Youtube.   For the most part, I'm basically on my own, My friends are somewhat interested in it and want to play, but expect me to Teach/Dungeon Master the game for them, I'd really wish to do this, but need more insight and expertise. I've played the solo Campaign in the Red box and even thought about joining a local group from a popular gaming store in Phoenix, AZ called Imperial Outpost. But I'm not sure if they would take a newbie like myself. Any advice? I have been attempting to solve this integral for several days in preparation for an exam and keep reaching dead ends.  I(a,b) = $\int_0^{\pi/2} \ln(a^{2}\cos^2(x)+b^{2}\sin^2(x)) dx$, where $a,b&gt;0$  My best approach so far is defining:  $F(x) = I(x, b)$  Then, I know:  $F(b) = I(b, b) = \pi/2 * \ln(b^2)$  Then I am now attempting to find $F'(x)$ using differentiation under the integral sign, and integrating from b to a.  This is where I am stuck - no matter what I do, I cannot solve the integral. Am I in the right direction or should this be solved in a different manner? I also considered something elliptical due to the acos, bsin in the original integral, yet it has also reached a dead end. Eigenvalues of symmetric matrices are real without (!) complex numbers Is there any proof of the fact that the eigenvalues of symmetric matrices (i.e. $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ with $A^t=A$) are real without the use of the concept of complex numbers? Trying to solve     $f(x)$ is uniformly continuous in the range of $[0, +\infty)$ and $\int_a^\infty f(x)dx  $ converges.   I need to prove that: $$\lim \limits_{x \to \infty} f(x) = 0$$  Would appreciate your help! ASP.NET MVC Namespace renaming I renamed my project from MyProjectName to MyNewProjectName.  I did a complete find/replace on the solution and changed the test project aswell.  In Default.aspx.cs I get an InvalidOpterationException with   "The controller name 'Home' is ambiguous between the following types: MyNewProjectName.Controllers.HomeController MyProjectName.Controllers.HomeController."  How do i fix that?  Thanks How to make a persistent live Ubuntu USB with more than 4GB I have trouble on this question: "Characterize the groups G for which the map $$\iota: G \to G$$ sending $$x \mapsto x^{-1}$$ for all $x \in G$, is an automorphism of $G$." From  post I have seen that $G$ must be abelian. Can anyone propose another characteristic of $G$ that I can derive from the given conditions besides abelian? Thank you so much!! This is a pretty well known quote from the Star Wars movies. But isn't it a bit paradoxical?   It in itself is an absolute, and it was said by a Jedi (Obi-Wan if I recall correctly?). If this holds true, then is he leaning towards the Sith himself? If it isn't true, then both Jedi and Sith can deal in absolutes and the statement is pointless.  Surely it should be phased along the lines of "Jedi's should avoid dealing in absolutes" or something similar? This was a 'young-adult' SF novel I read in the late 1970's, about the same time I was reading Voorloper by Andre Norton, Madeleine L'engle's Wrinkle In Time books and the Dragonfall 5 young adult novels. so I am not sure if it is actually one of the Dragonfall 5 stories, but I can't confirm it is or isn't by reading available synposes online.   As I recall, the story went something like this...    * SOME SPOILERS BELOW *  A young person and sibling - I think female protag and younger brother, but not sure - is scheduled to visit their aunt and uncle on another planet but to make the voyage in a timely fashion, must utilize this new consciousness transference technology to transmit their consciousness across the cosmos to a host replica body at the destination. After arriving at the destination the protagonist is impressed by their new body and is aware of the only way to tell they are in a replicant body is a small seam, scar or patch on their back, I think near the top of their spine, just below the collar of whatever clothing they wore.  The mystery begins when the protagonist realizes their hosts also sport the same scar when they should legitimately be in their real bodies.  The plot thickens when the protag or sibling finds a room of people in stasis when their replicant counterparts are roaming the same planet, and is subsequently caught in the act.  Sadly, I do not remember anything else, including the reasoning behind the deception.  I was quite young when I read this novel, so I probably got some of the details mixed up, but would love to know the name and author of the novel if anyone remembers. Rubik's Cube Combination Could anyone explain why the number of legal or reachable combinations of a $3\times 3\times 3$ Rubik's Cube is $1/12\mbox{th}$ of the total. I understood the logic behind the total number of combinations: $8! \cdot 2^{12} + 3^{12} \cdot 12!$. What I am not able to understand is why do we divide this quantity by $2 \cdot 3\cdot 2$. I don't have any idea about parity or group/set theory. Is there another possible explanation for it? Possible arguments:  Pro   For brevity for trivial deductions   Contra   Looks like the writer could not be bothered to write an extensive explanation Definition of what is trivial to which reader and what not