Ignoring autocomplete='off' in chrome browser once user choosing the auto filling option in chrome browser it will auto automatically change the value of this select box according the some deflate values in chrome browser so how can i stop this issue.  I have fond some solutions while i'm googling so it also not working. is there any other solution  1st option is put autocomplete="off"   2nd option is creating fake select box and put style="display: none;"  &lt;form:select path="quote.toLocation[${varstat.index}]" multiple="false" cssClass="select_typ1 bigselect drpView_ti" cssErrorClass="errorInput select_typ1 bigselect" onchange="removeError(this);" cssStyle="margin-top: 0px;float: left;" autocomplete="off"&gt;                             &lt;form:option value=""&gt;Please select destination&lt;/form:option&gt;                             &lt;form:options items="${countryList}" itemLabel="displayName"                                  itemValue="code" cssClass="countrySelectClass" /&gt;                         &lt;/form:select&gt;
Is there a W3C valid way to disable autocomplete in a HTML form? When using the xhtml1-transitional.dtd doctype, collecting a credit card number with the following HTML  &lt;input type="text" id="cardNumber" name="cardNumber" autocomplete='off'/&gt;   will flag a warning on the W3C validator:     there is no attribute "autocomplete".   Is there a W3C / standards way to disable browser auto-complete on sensitive fields in a form?
Proving an inclusion related to algebraic sets and interpreting it Deleting array elements in JavaScript - delete vs splice What is the difference between using  on the array element as opposed to using ?   For example:  myArray = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];  delete myArray[1]; //  or myArray.splice (1, 1);   Why even have the splice method if I can delete array elements like I can with objects? I'm playing around, trying to write some code to use the  APIs to shorten a URL.  After reading , I tried:     TRIM_API_URL = 'http://api.tr.im/api'    auth_handler = urllib2.HTTPBasicAuthHandler()    auth_handler.add_password(realm='tr.im',                              uri=TRIM_API_URL,                              user=USERNAME,                              passwd=PASSWORD)    opener = urllib2.build_opener(auth_handler)    urllib2.install_opener(opener)    response = urllib2.urlopen('%s/trim_simple?url=%s'                               % (TRIM_API_URL, url_to_trim))    url = response.read().strip()   response.code is 200 (I think it should be 202).  url is valid, but the basic HTTP authentication doesn't seem to have worked, because the shortened URL isn't in my list of URLs (at ).  After reading  I also tried:     TRIM_API_URL = 'api.tr.im/api'    password_mgr = urllib2.HTTPPasswordMgrWithDefaultRealm()    password_mgr.add_password(None, TRIM_API_URL, USERNAME, PASSWORD)    auth_handler = urllib2.HTTPBasicAuthHandler(password_mgr)    opener = urllib2.build_opener(auth_handler)    urllib2.install_opener(opener)    response = urllib2.urlopen('http://%s/trim_simple?url=%s'                               % (TRIM_API_URL, url_to_trim))    url = response.read().strip()   But I get the same results.  (response.code is 200 and url is valid, but not recorded in my account at .)  If I use query string parameters instead of basic HTTP authentication, like this:     TRIM_API_URL = 'http://api.tr.im/api'    response = urllib2.urlopen('%s/trim_simple?url=%s&amp;username=%s&amp;password=%s'                               % (TRIM_API_URL,                                  url_to_trim,                                  USERNAME,                                  PASSWORD))    url = response.read().strip()   ...then not only is url valid but it's recorded in my tr.im account. (Though response.code is still 200.)  There must be something wrong with my code though (and not tr.im's API), because  $ curl -u yacitus:xxxx http://api.tr.im/api/trim_url.json?url=http://www.google.co.uk   ...returns:  {"trimpath":"hfhb","reference":"nH45bftZDWOX0QpVojeDbOvPDnaRaJ","trimmed":"11\/03\/2009","destination":"http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/","trim_path":"hfhb","domain":"google.co.uk","url":"http:\/\/tr.im\/hfhb","visits":0,"status":{"result":"OK","code":"200","message":"tr.im URL Added."},"date_time":"2009-03-11T10:15:35-04:00"}   ...and the URL does appear in my list of URLs on .  And if I run:  $ curl -u yacitus:xxxx http://api.tr.im/api/trim_url.json?url=http://www.google.co.uk   ...again, I get:  {"trimpath":"hfhb","reference":"nH45bftZDWOX0QpVojeDbOvPDnaRaJ","trimmed":"11\/03\/2009","destination":"http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/","trim_path":"hfhb","domain":"google.co.uk","url":"http:\/\/tr.im\/hfhb","visits":0,"status":{"result":"OK","code":"201","message":"tr.im URL Already Created [yacitus]."},"date_time":"2009-03-11T10:15:35-04:00"}   Note code is 201, and message is "tr.im URL Already Created [yacitus]."  I must not be doing the basic HTTP authentication correctly (in either attempt).  Can you spot my problem?  Perhaps I should look and see what's being sent over the wire?  I've never done that before.  Are there Python APIs I can use (perhaps in pdb)?  Or is there another tool (preferably for Mac OS X) I can use? In sysctl, the /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/ keys have the following subkeys: all, default, and a key for each network interface. For example, on a machine with a single network interface eth0, it will look like this:  iserv ~ # ll /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/ /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/: insgesamt 0 dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 12. Sep 23:30 all/ dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 12. Sep 23:30 default/ dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 12. Sep 23:30 eth0/ dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 12. Sep 23:30 lo/  /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/: insgesamt 0 dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 12. Sep 23:30 all/ dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 12. Sep 23:30 default/ dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 12. Sep 23:30 eth0/ dr-xr-xr-x 0 root root 0 12. Sep 23:30 lo/   All the respective settings exist in each key separately. For example, if I want to disable IPv6 Router Advertisements with the accept_ra value, this value exists four times:  iserv ~ # sysctl -a 2&gt;/dev/null | grep "accept_ra " net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 1 net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra = 1 net.ipv6.conf.lo.accept_ra = 1 net.ipv6.conf.eth0.accept_ra = 1   My question now is: which of these values do I need to change? I figured all (to change all existing interfaces) and default (to change all new interfaces that may appear later), but changing these still leaves the value at 1 for lo and eth0:  iserv ~ # sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0 net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 0 iserv ~ # sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra=0 net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra = 0 iserv ~ # sysctl -a 2&gt;/dev/null | grep "accept_ra "   net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 0 net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra = 0 net.ipv6.conf.lo.accept_ra = 1 net.ipv6.conf.eth0.accept_ra = 1   Will the machine now accept Router Advertisements on eth0, or will it not? Is osmosis a kind of thermal machine? The hyperphysics article defines osmosis as a process driven by internal energy and internal energy is defined as energy associated with random,disordered motion of molecules. Osmosis develops pressure and lifts weight so it has the output of a machine.  But what drives osmosis? Is osmosis driven at the expense of thermal energy although there is no temperature gradient? Where does de Broglie wavelength $\lambda=h/p$ for massive particles come from? I'm curious where the  $p=\frac{h}{\lambda}$ comes from?   I know that for light (which has no rest mass), the following is true:  $E=pc$ and $E=hf$  so,  $$pc=hf \Rightarrow p=\frac{hf}{c}=\frac{h}{\lambda}$$  But how is the expression $p=\frac{h}{\lambda}$ obtained for a massive particle where $E\neq pc$? I've read some people claim that the expression can be derived, and others saying it's an experimentally verified relationship. In the film and book series, Year 4 (Goblet of Fire), how is it Mad-Eye Moody/Barty Crouch could see Harry through his Magical Eye even when he was under the Invisibility Cloak?  As the cloak is a True Invisibility cloak, immune to charms and spells, and according to legend invisible to even Death, how did Mad-Eye detect Harry Potter under the cloak? How Nagini and Mrs. Norris were able to sense Harry were through other senses, such as smell and warmth, but not visually.  I'm referring to the scene/chapter where Snape follows Harry at night. Harry hides under the Invisibility Cloak but his foot is stuck at the broken staircase. Eventually Mad-Eye arrives, sees Harry through his Magical Eye, and talks Snape away. Changing underline color of LanguageTool in TeXstudio I've recently installed LanguageTool to check grammar and spelling mistakes in TeXstudio. However, I often miss the errors because the gray-bluish underlining makes them hard to spot. Is there a way to change the underlining to a distinctive color, such as red for example?   I checked . It says I have to do some changes to the .languagetool.cfg file, but for some reason this file doesn't appear in File Explorer. Automatic left and right commands math fallacy problem: $-1= (-1)^3 = (-1)^{6/2} = \sqrt{(-1)^6}= 1$? Ignore Pulses Less than a Given Width in a Pulse Train Let's say I have a 5V pulse train that varies between 0 and 75000 pulses per second. Pulse width, let's say, is 5 microseconds. How could I calculate or determine the best way to filter out all pulses less than 4 microseconds in width? GeoTools CRS.getAxisOrder(CRS.getAxisOrder("EPSG:4326")) returns EAST_NORTH (LON_LAT) All is in the title, with GeoTools if I do :  AxisOrder order = CRS.getAxisOrder(CRS.getAxisOrder("EPSG:4326"));   It returns EAST_NORTH (= LON_LAT), but EPSG:4326 is defined as ordering latitude first and then longitude, as stated here :   So, what is happening here ? Am I doing something wrong ? YA book about a young powerful female caster attending a school that trains in magical arts and duels I read a young adult novel around the turn of the century. This story features a young female protagonist that is very naturally gifted in magic. She is attending a  to learn mastery and control over her gifts.  A lot of her school revolves around magic dueling. The participants are taught to extend their inner aura like a second magical skin, possibly referred to as creating a shield, or . The user can increase the strength of the shield by focusing harder on it, but doing so means you have less ability to be offensive. The amount of energy needed to create a shield was half the energy a foe would need to focus at you to break it.  Ex: Mage A and B are equally matched. Mage A focuses half his power into a shield. Mage B would then need to focus 100% of his power to break A’s shield.  Another aspect I remember is that when dueling, a school master would extend a personal shield on to one of the combatants as a sort of secondary shield that goes underneath the combatants. When one mage broke the others mages personal shield, the school masters shield protects the losers life from harm, and the breaker of the shield is declared the winner.  I distinctly remember one match in which the protagonist is having a duel with another strong student. She creates a wind storm around herself that picks up the sand from the arena floor and makes her impossible to see and thus makes it hard for her opponent to focus on her shield to break it. She then lashes out at her opponent with incredibly powerful strikes with the final strike being so hard it shatters the opponents shield and then breaks the school masters shield as well and stops just shy of killing her dueling partner.  Any assistance on this one? I think my daughter would love to read it. If you're interested in grammar, as I am, I am sure you have delved into a thought process about infinitive to, and like me, you have probably questioned what it is, or what it could be defined as. My mind always wants to place it in the Eight Parts of Speech, and I know this is foolish of me to some regard, so I stray from it, but I still wish to designate it under something that can be explain it. So, this is the motivation for this post, this question: What is the infinitive to, and why?  Here are my thoughts: There are three real possibilities, going back through the times. First, we can say that it is part of the verb that comes after it (to go, to run, etc.). This could be supported by the claim that you are not supposed to "split" infinitives ("To boldly go"), but only that.   Secondly, we could consider it a subordinator. I came across this designation most recently in my studies of modern and transformational grammar. As of right now, it is still the one I accept, especially as a result of the trend of designating more phrases as clauses. It works, except it's weird. Do we call this a unique subordinator as a result of how it operates? For example, to-infinitive clauses call for non-finite verb forms, which typically have an implied subject as a part of their clause. For example, "I want to go to the store." In the infinitive clause, "I" is the implied subject, as a understand. So, again, this works. However, things get a little weird when other subordinators come into play. For example, "I'm excited for you to win the competition." Now, if I'm right, those of you will say that "for" is a preposition here, as a result of the new-grammar stuff, but I'm going to count it as a subordinator, as defined by my own beliefs and that of a lot of other grammars. So, how do the clauses work in such a sentence? According to transformational grammar, "for you to win the competition" is defined as an ordinary clause. So, does that mean that it also contains a secondary clause within itself (the infinitive clause part)? If so, how do those two clauses work in conjunction to each other when one is so integrated? "For you to win the competition" looks to just be one clause, but if that's the case, doesn't "to" have to represent something else?  This moves us on to the third way to look at things, which is to consider "to" as auxiliary verb, a defective one at that. There are a lot of things to support this, and it even allows for the split infinitive. Furthermore, it calls for a non-finite verb form to follow, like an auxiliary. But, as I said before, it's defective in the way that is all it can function as.  As I said, I still accept to as a subordinator, but I want to be proven wrong or right. Wrong by showing evidence of it being something else, or right by showing how clauses operate when it seems to be layered up. In general relativity (GR), spacetime is viewed as a differentiable manifold of dimension $D$ with a metric of Lorentzian signature $(-,+,+,...,+)$.  My question is why differentiable? Antonym of "deepen" Since there is no word "shallowen", is there a good antonym of "deepen"? The meaning of "deepen" that I am referring to here is "to cause to become deeper." It doesn't necessarily refer to digging a hole. For example, a temporary deformation in a soft surface:     Putting the anvil on the mattress deepens the depression in it, but removing the anvil ______ it.   I would also be happy with an antonym of the intransitive version "to become deeper." A conceptual doubt regarding Forced Oscillations and Resonance While studying about the Resonance and Forced Oscillations, I came across a graph in my textbook that is given below:-  Now, the author writes      As the amount of damping increases, the peak shifts to lower frequencies.   Why does this happen? And does this imply that at higher damping levels one cannot achieve a higher amplitude by setting the period of the forced oscillation to be equal to the natural frequency? This seems strange because, the highest amplitude is achieved when the natural frequency is equal to the driving frequency. But, I guess that the rules are somehow different for the damping case. Is it correct? It's the message I see right before the metro/subway train shows up.  Shouldn't it be "train is approaching" or "train approaches"? When I type dpkg -l | grep xserver-xorg, I get list of installed packages and their versions:  ii  xserver-xorg               1:7.7+3~deb7u1 ii  xserver-xorg-core          2:1.12.4-6 ii  xserver-xorg-input-evdev   1:2.7.0-1+b1 ii  xserver-xorg-input-kbd     1:1.6.1-1+b1 ii  xserver-xorg-input-mouse   1:1.7.2-3 ii  xserver-xorg-video-radeon  1:6.14.4-8   I am wondering what the number  infront of the colon means, ie the number 2 in 2:1.12.4-6 css background color with floating elements