Just downloaded and installed Ubuntu 17.10 and I was wondering if I could change the look. To look like the Ubuntu 17.04 or just change it, as it is. PS. I prefer the Ubuntu 17.04 look.(UNITY)
I've installed the GNOME Shell in Ubuntu 12.04 and I want to change the "Shell Theme", But it doesn't allow me to do that.  The alert says something like: "The GNOME-Shell extension is not activated", and I want to install it with the console, But it returns me an error.  How can I solve this problem?
Write a formula in an Excel Cell using VBA I'm trying to use VBA to write a formula into a cell in Excel. My problem is that when I use a semicolon (;) in my formula, I get an error:     Run-time error 1004   My macro is the following :   Sub Jours_ouvres()     Dim Feuille_Document As String     Feuille_Document = "DOCUMENT"             Application.Worksheets(Feuille_Document).Range("F2").Formula = "=SUM(D2;E2)"     End Sub How to handle users who don't select answers for their questions? How do I hide an element when printing a web page? I have a link on my webpage to print the webpage. However, the link is also visible in the printout itself.  Is there javascript or HTML code which would hide the link button when I click the print link?  Example:   "Good Evening"  Print (click Here To Print)   I want to hide this "Print" label when it prints the text "Good Evening". The "Print" label should not show on the printout itself. Is there a way to avoid "+canned.response" in the email address using Gmail's canned response feature If I set up a filter and send it a canned response, Gmail appends +canned.response to my username in the reply.  For example, given the filter "from:foo@example.com to:me@example.com" set up to send a canned response, when foo@example.com sends me an email the canned response comes from me+canned.response@example.com instead of me@example.com, exposing that I'm using a canned response.  Is there a way to avoid this? Prove that the multiplicative inverse of $a$ modulo $m$ exists if and only if $a$ and $m$ are coprime. Prove that the multiplicative inverse of $a$ modulo $m$ exists if and only if $a$ and $m$ are coprime.  Can someone help me with this? This question is here so we can offer users who are looking for information on how to make one or more common or basic redirects in Apache using the htaccess file. All future questions pertaining to finding information that is that is covered by the question should be closed as a duplication of this question. .  Whats the point in this question? The idea while not perfect is catch the most commonly asked questions regarding redirects using the  htaccess on the Apache platform either on  some type of lamp or a live server. The type of answers should be generally those that you could imagine are used by 100,000’s of sites world-wide and are constantly asked here at Pro Webmasters repeatedly over and over in various forms.  A few examples of the type of answers we are looking for:   How can I redirect non-www to www? How can I redirect a sub domain to the main domain? How can I redirect a sub folder from domain to a root or a subdomain?  How can I redirect an old URL to a new URL?   A few examples of the types of answers that we are not looking for:   Answers that do not involve a redirect. Any answers relating to NGinx, IIS or any other non-Apache platform. Answers that involve custom and complex string or query removals.   Resources for Advanced to Complex Mod_Rewrite Rules:      Please note: that this question is still in construction and may need some refining either by myself or a real moderator of Pro Webmasters, if you have any concerns or questions . An interesting exercise about converging positive series, involving $\sum_{n\geq 1}a_n^{\frac{n-1}{n}}$ Memory and CPU optimizers: Are they gimmicks? Why does evolution not make life longer for humans or any other species?  Wouldn't evolution favour a long life? I really like the 'ring chart' or 'wheel chart' given as an example on page 88 of the PGF manual. It is like a pie chart, but with a label in the centre. Unfortunately, the manual doesn't give the source for that chart. Does anyone have an example? Thanks. I have to prove that:     $$\sum_{k=0}^{n} {{m+k} \choose{m}} = { m+n+1 \choose m+1 }$$   I tried to open up the right side with Pascal's definition that: $$ { n \choose k} = {n-1 \choose {k}} + {n-1 \choose {k-1}}$$  Here is what I came up with, and I am sure it is wrong because it does not equal the left side:  $$ {m+n+1 \choose m+1} = {m+n \choose m+1} + {m+n \choose m} = ... ={m+n \choose m+1} + {m+n-1 \choose m} + {m+n-2 \choose m-1} + ... + {m \choose m+1} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} {m+k \choose m+k-n+1 }  $$  Which, again, probably is wrong because it is not equal $\sum_{k=0}^{n} { m+k \choose m}$. Any help is appreciated 'Some index files failed to download' while updating Would I be scrutinized at the border for traveling to the US twice in a quick succession? I am a British citizen visiting the USA in early August for a two week vacation with friends. After the holiday I'm returning to my home in the UK for three weeks. After that I will return to the USA and will be working for my British employer under the Visa Waiver Program for a period of 80-85 days.  I have read already that there is technically no problems with this under ESTA rules, but should I limit this working period to a shorter time frame (e.g. 70 or so days) so that it does not negatively affect the decision made by the POE officer? Ideally I would love to be over in the states for the near-full 85 day period.  Any advice or previous experiences anyone can offer?  Some clarifications: As confirmed by the immigration attorney, as I am employed by my UK employer, it will be regarded as a business trip, the important part being that I will be working officially as a consultant for my UK employer just overseas for the allotted 85 or so days Why does a vertical line have a SLOPE (steepness) of undefined? The curve shows :   x goes 1 to right  y goes up by 3   the SLOPE is defined as the ratio of rise to the step  SLOPE = rise/step = 3/1 = 3  Now that :   Horizontal line has SLOPE of 0. Vertical line has SLOPE of undefined.   It makes sense for me to imagine horizontal line has SLOPE of 0 since there is no rise at all. But why the vertical has SLOPE of undefined.? Send file using POST from a Python script Time Dilation When In Orbit Insert missing dates within table I have a table with a column for ID, Date and Frequency of occurrence for that particular date and ID.  ID    date          Frequency 1     2014-05-18      5 1     2014-05-19      4 1     2014-05-20      25 2     2014-05-20      7 3     2014-05-18      4 3     2014-05-20      1 4     2014-05-18      6   I'm looking to insert the dates for each ID that aren't currently there (assuming that the date ranges from 2014-05-18 to 2014-05-20) and add a value of 0 in Frequency for those.  For example, you can see that  ID 1 has an observation for all three dates;  ID 2 is missing 2014-05-18 and 2014-05-19;   ID 3 is missing 2014-05-19;   ID 4 is missing 2014-05-19 and 2014-05-20.  Therefore, the output should look like this  ID    date          Frequency 1     2014-05-18      5 1     2014-05-19      4 1     2014-05-20      25 2     2014-05-18      0 2     2014-05-19      0 2     2014-05-20      7 3     2014-05-18      4 3     2014-05-19      0 3     2014-05-20      1 4     2014-05-18      6 4     2014-05-19      0 4     2014-05-20      0   I've attempted the following from . However, that will only add dates with 0 Frequency that aren't present throughout the entire table instead of on an ID level.   DECLARE @s DATE = '20140518', @e DATE = '20140520';  SELECT c.date, Frequency = COALESCE(a.Frequency,0) FROM dbo.Calendar AS c LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.table AS a ON c.date = s.[date] WHERE c.d &gt;= @s AND c.d &lt; DATEADD(DAY, 1, @e); Need help in proving that $\frac{\sin\theta - \cos\theta + 1}{\sin\theta + \cos\theta - 1} = \frac 1{\sec\theta - \tan\theta}$ We need to prove that $$\dfrac{\sin\theta - \cos\theta + 1}{\sin\theta + \cos\theta - 1} = \frac 1{\sec\theta - \tan\theta}$$  I have tried and it gets confusing. How can I get distribution name and version number in a simple shell script? I'm working on a simple bash script that should be able to run on Ubuntu and CentOS distributions (support for Debian and Fedora/RHEL would be a plus) and I need to know the name and version of the distribution the script is running (in order to trigger specific actions, for instance the creation of repositories). So far what I've got is this:  OS=$(awk '/DISTRIB_ID=/' /etc/*-release | sed 's/DISTRIB_ID=//' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]') ARCH=$(uname -m | sed 's/x86_//;s/i[3-6]86/32/') VERSION=$(awk '/DISTRIB_RELEASE=/' /etc/*-release | sed 's/DISTRIB_RELEASE=//' | sed 's/[.]0/./')  if [ -z "$OS" ]; then     OS=$(awk '{print $1}' /etc/*-release | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]') fi  if [ -z "$VERSION" ]; then     VERSION=$(awk '{print $3}' /etc/*-release) fi  echo $OS echo $ARCH echo $VERSION   This seems to work, returning ubuntu or centos (I haven't tried others) as the release name. However, I have a feeling that there must be an easier, more reliable way of finding this out -- is that true?  It doesn't work for RedHat. /etc/redhat-release contains : Redhat Linux Entreprise release 5.5  So, the version is not the third word, you'd better use :  OS_MAJOR_VERSION=`sed -rn 's/.*([0-9])\.[0-9].*/\1/p' /etc/redhat-release` OS_MINOR_VERSION=`sed -rn 's/.*[0-9].([0-9]).*/\1/p' /etc/redhat-release` echo "RedHat/CentOS $OS_MAJOR_VERSION.$OS_MINOR_VERSION" Why don’t photons interact with the Higgs field and hence remain massless?