Can I install Ubuntu on a partition formatted as NTFS, instead of EXT4?  After installing Ubuntu 11.10 using ext4, I keep on getting disk errors at boot up.  But on this same harddrive, I have Windows 7, and I don't get these errors.  So I wanted to try NTFS, instead of EXT4, and see if it makes any difference.  The harddrive is about 5 years old.  So if it is failing, I would think it would be giving trouble in Windows just as well.
The Ubuntu installer does not allow me to install on NTFS partitions, but certain circumstances requires me to do so. Is it possible?
How can I repeat the header but not the caption with longtable? I am trying to set up a longtable where the header is repeated on every new page but the caption only appears once at the top of the page.  The table is defined as follows:  \begin{longtable}{|l|l|l|} \caption{the table caption} \label{tab:11swpkg}\\ \hline \rowcolor{gray} HeaderCol1 &amp; HeaderCol2 &amp; HeaderCol3\endhead     \hline\hline Item11 &amp; Item12 &amp; Item13 \\ \hline Item21 &amp; Item22 &amp; Item23 \\ \hline Item31 &amp; Item32 &amp; Item33 \\ \hline \end{longtable}   This nearly works because the header is indeed repeated after a page break but so is the caption. How can I get rid of the caption after a page break? To prove the convergence of the p-series   $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac1{n^p}$$  for $p &gt; 1$, one typically appeals to either the Integral Test or the Cauchy Condensation Test.  I am wondering if there is a self-contained proof that this series converges which does not rely on either test.    I suspect that any proof would have to use the ideas behind one of these two tests. Pattern matching with LIKE, SIMILAR TO or regular expressions in PostgreSQL I had to write a simple query where I go looking for people's name that start with a B or a D :   SELECT s.name  FROM spelers s  WHERE s.name LIKE 'B%' OR s.name LIKE 'D%' ORDER BY 1   I was wondering if there is a way to rewrite this to become more performant. So I can avoid or and / or like? I am reading the Dummit and Foote's proof of Cauchy's theorem for abelian groups. On the highlighted line, how do you conclude from $y\notin N$ and $y^p\in N$ that $\langle y^p \rangle \neq \langle y \rangle$ and that $|y^p|&lt;|y|$?     Proposition 21.   If $G$ is a finite abelian group and $p$ is a prime dividing $|G|$, then $G$ contains an element of order $p$.      Proof:   The proof proceeds by induction on $|G|$, namely, we assume the result is valid for every group whose order is strictly smaller than the order of $G$ and then prove the result valid for $G$ (this is sometimes referred to as complete induction).   Since $|G| &gt; 1$, there is an element $x \in G$ with $x \neq 1$.   If $|G| = p$ then $x$ has order $p$ by Lagrange’s Theorem and we are done.   We may therefore assume $|G| &gt; p$.      Suppose $p$ divides $|x|$ and write $|x| = pn$.   By Proposition 2.5(3), $|x^n| = p$, and again we have an element of order $p$.   We may therefore assume $p$ does not divides $|x|$.      Let $N = \langle x \rangle$.   Since $G$ is abelian, $N \trianglelefteq G$.   By Lagrange’s Theorem, $|G/N| = |G|/|N|$ and since $N \neq 1$, $|G/N| &lt; |G|$.   Since $p$ does not divide $|N|$, we must have $p \mid |G/N|$.   We can now apply the induction assumption to the smaller group $G/N$ to conclude it contains an element $\bar{y} = yN$, of order $p$.   Since $y \notin N$ ($\bar{y} \neq \bar{1}$) but $y^p \in N$ ($\bar{y}^p = \bar{1}$) we must have $\langle y^p \rangle \neq \langle y \rangle$, that is, $|y^p| &lt; |y|$.   Proposition 2.5(2) implies $p \mid |y|$.   We are now in the situation described in the preceding paragraph, so that argument again produces an element of order $p$.   The induction is complete.      (Original image .) How do you create a daemon in Python? reveals x2 code snippets. The first result is to  which has a lot of documentation and explanation, along with some useful discussion underneath.   However, , whilst not containing so much documentation, includes sample code for passing commands such as start, stop and restart. It also creates a PID file which can be handy for checking if the daemon is already running etc.  These samples both explain how to create the daemon. Are there any additional things that need to be considered? Is one sample better than the other, and why? How do I disable "Workspace dock" (a bottom panel with the list of open windows and a workspace indicator-cum-switcher), the one that is over "Plank" in the screenshot below?    I'm using Ubuntu 17.10. What are some good tips on how to extrude text in Adobe Illustrator? I'm bit of a newbie in Adobe Illustrator and have been learning the application by trying to follow some tutorials and recreating some cool stuff I come across on the web.   That being said, I'm having trouble replicating the effect found in the following image using the standard 'Extrude &amp; Bevel' options. I've also tried copying + pasting the text in front, back, in place and that came out even more horrendous. 'Extrude &amp; Bevel' gives me a nice approximation but nothing that pops out like in the example.   Any tips on how to fine tune my 'Extrude &amp; Bevel' settings or an entirely different method of achieving a similar effect would be very much appreciated. Thanks for your time and help!  How can I create a 3D effect on my text similar to the one in the following image, using Illustrator's Extrude and Bevel tools? I have a live USB made with the standard Ubuntu disk image creator for 16.04 LTS. In the current state, I can boot to this disk, but it still requires the original USB to run properly at all times.  Attempting to pull the drive and use the system generates a large amount of I/O errors, further suggesting that the USB drive is actually needed for things not already loaded into RAM (For example, Firefox worked without the USB, but I used it once before already. apt, on the other hand, did not.)  Is there a way to copy the entire Ubuntu live disk to RAM, so I can remove the drive and free up a USB slot for other things? If a commutative ring is semiprime and its prime ideals are maximal then it is von Neumann regular (absolutely flat). If a commutative ring is semiprime and its prime ideals are maximal then it is von Neumann regular (absolutely flat).  The converse, although not immediately apparent, can be proven quite easily. But I've been stuck on this one for awhile.  I found that Bourbaki has a question in his treatise on commutative algebra, namely: if all points in Spec(A) are closed (ie. prime ideals are maximal) then A/R (where R is the nilradical) is von Neumann regular (absolutely flat). If this can be proven, the above statement follows immediately since the nilradical of a semiprime ring 0?  Ideas?   Ps: this is my first time posting a question so apologies for any formatting issues. My 3-month-old son has started sleeping through the night, with a vengeance. He sleeps for hours. And when he finally wakes up and I expect him to be starving, he's often still ready to happily play for a bit - say 1/2 hour to 45 min. Now, I know this isn't such normal behavior for a 3-month-old, and I'm definitely appreciating having my nights back, but I'm also a bit concerned - how long is the longest I should let him go without eating?  Edit (more details):  I used to try to stretch him and make his last feeding right before I went to sleep, so that I could take full advantage of his sleep-time. So we used to put him to bed about 12:30-1:00, and then head to sleep ourselves. He started off going about 6-7 hours... But a couple of weeks ago he started sleeping longer, and longer, and longer... Now he goes nearly 12 hours. He'll go to sleep at 12:30 AM and wake up at 12 PM or later. And he'll then happily play for another half hour, making about 12 hours of no-eating. I generally trust that I can rely on him to tell me when he's hungry, but I was wondering if there's a limit to how long I can let him go without eating... Bayes rule logic. Why we do use this? vertical align middle in 14.04 microphone noice buzzing sounds My Microphone started acting up badly this morning has a loud buzz, it has got to be software it was working fine last night installed updates and shutdown last night and boom here we are, oh and i have a Microphone jack microphone and a internal mic, both are acting up... Please help  PLEASE help i need to use skype.  Dafull97 GroupBy a list of associations with their keys Travel without an Italian residence permit in the Schengen area How can time dilation be symmetric? Adding Edge Loops Around Airplane Window I would like to add an edge loop around each one of these windows and are not 100% sure on the best way to do it even after watching some videos.  If someone could point me in the right direction that would be great. Thanks. Is there a simple way in Perl that will allow me to determine if a given variable is numeric?  Something along the lines of:  if (is_number($x)) { ... }   would be ideal.  A technique that won't throw warnings when the -w switch is being used is certainly preferred. Is [Its'] a word? (Note the apostrophe at the end.) I just had a strange flashback to a conversation I had when I was in high school, with a man who was regarded by many members of a particular online community as having an impressive degree of knowledge of the English language.  The conversation centered on a claim this man made that I found very difficult to accept. I had made some remark involving the difference between it's and its (a distinction which I trust is quite well-known to the majority of users on this site), to which he had contributed, mostly phrased as an amusing aside, that there was one more word I hadn't mentioned: its', with the apostrophe at the end.  I originally thought he might have been joking, but we ended up debating this rather fervently. I seem to recall that I kept demanding he use the word in an example sentence, but he either could not or refused to do so. Yet he maintained that it is a word.  Is this true? I must concede I haven't put a lot of thought into it just now; but at the time, I was perplexed by the very suggestion that it could be a word (what could it mean?), and at the moment I can't really think of any scenario where it would make any sense. What is the true origin of the orcs? There are a bunch of theories about the true origin of the orcs. Tolkien tried out a few different origins for his Orcs throughout his life but died before he could fully revise The Silmarillion with his final view on their origins and nature.   There is a list of origins proposed by Tolkien():   Made of stone and slime through the sorcery of Morgoth; East Elves, where The Silmarillion contains a suggestion that Orcs are descended from East Elves captured by Melkor, their minds and bodies distorted and corrupted. Sentient beasts, another of Tolkien's theories proposes that Orcs may have begun as soulless animals of vaguely humanoid shapes, empowered by the will of the Dark Lord (Morgoth) and learning language only as parrots do. Fallen Maiar, there are hints in the History of Middle-earth series of books, (especially in Morgoth's Ring in the section "Myths Transformed"), that some Orc leaders, such as the First Age's Boldog, or the Great Goblin encountered by Bilbo and the Dwarves, may in fact have been fallen Maiar which had taken Orc form. Corrupted Men, while Tolkien at some point saw all Orcs as descended from the original corrupted and tortured Elves, later comments of his indicate, according to Christopher Tolkien in Morgoth's Ring "Myths Transformed" text X, that he began to feel uncomfortable with this theory. At about the same time he removed the references to the Thrall-Ñoldorin, he also began searching for a new origin for the Orcs. It seems Tolkien wanted to change the origin of the Orcs to make them corrupted and twisted Humans.  A mix of corrupted Elves and Men, A late idea of Tolkien seems to be that Orcs (or Orks, showing the late spelling change) had a mixed origin of Elves and Men. Some cross-bred with Men, Tolkien also suggested that Men were cross-bred with Orcs under Morgoth's lieutenant, Sauron (and possibly under Morgoth himself). The process was later repeated during the War of the Ring by Saruman. This possibly refers to the way the Uruk-hai and the Half-Orcs were created, in The Lord of the Rings.   Of all these theories, which is the most accepted, and which did Tolkien agree with the most? I always thought that orcs were made of East Elves, as explained in The Lord of The Rings, but the story goes beyond this, there are the stories in many other books that explain different things.  What can you tell me about this?