I am studying Lp-Spaces and Banach-Spaces and the norm for $ p \in [1, \infty) $ is given by $$||f||_{L_{p}}=\left ( \int _{X} ||f(x))||^{p} \right )^{1/p}$$ but i didn't find how to test it. Do you know any book or pdf where I can find the demo? Thank you so much
Show that $(L^{p},\|\|_{p})$ is a Banach space.  My approach: I prove the statement for $(L^{1},\|\|_{1})$, of the following way, first all, is easy show that $\|\|_{1}$ is a norm. So,  $(L^{1},\|\|_{1})$ is vector space. To show that is a Banach space, note that  Prop. 1: Let $(f_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\subset\mathcal{L}^{1}$ (where $\mathcal{L}^{1}=\mathcal{L}^{1}(X,\tau,\mu)$ is the space of all integrals function), such that $\sum_{i}{\|f_{n}\|}_{1}&lt;\infty$, then the sequences $\left(\sum_{n=1}^{N}{f_{n}}\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ converges almost everywhere to the integral function, that we called $\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}{f_{n}}$. Furthermore $$\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}{\int{f_{n}d\mu}}=\int{\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}{f_{n}d\mu}}\quad\lim_{N\to\infty}{\|\sum_{n=1}^{N}{f_{n}}-\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}{f_{n}}\|_{1}}=0$$ Prop. 2: Let $(E,\|\|)$ a normed vector space. Then $E$  is a Banach space if and only if for all $(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\subset E$ such that $\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}{\|e_{k}\|}&lt;\infty$, $\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n}{e_{k}}\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ converges in $E$  We take the proposition 2. Let $(f_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\subset L^{1}$ such that $\sum_{n}{\|\hat{f}_{n}\|_{1}}&lt;\infty$. Let $f_{n}\in\hat{f}_{n}$, then $\|f_{n}\|_{1}=\|\hat{f}_{n}\|_{1}$ and then $\sum_{n}{\|f_{n}\|_{1}}&lt;\infty$, by prop. 1, there exist $F\in\mathcal{L}^{1}$ such that $\|\sum_{n=1}^{N}{f_{n}-F\|_{1}}\to 0$, and then $\|\sum_{n=1}^{N}{\hat{f}_{n}-F\|_{1}}\to 0$. Finally note that $\hat{F}\in L^{1}$ is a Banach space. This was my answer for  $L^{1}$ space, but how I prove the general statement for $L^{p}$ (I want to do a similar response). Edit: I'm stuck in the problem, any idea or hint is appreciated.Thanks!!
With the confirmation that elements 113, 115, 117, and 118 are indeed fundamental elements that are now to be named on the periodic table, the next question is: what is the highest atomic number possible for an element? Feynman had a go at this years ago, and he derived (according to my limited understanding) that above element-137 (informally denoted 'Feynmanium') the electrons in the nearest orbit about the nucleus would be traveling at a velocity greater than the speed of light. (Note I am considering the Bohr model of the atom in this question.) I wished to demonstrate to my friends why this is and I came up with the following explanation.  According to Bohr's quantum condition, the angular momentum of an electron about the nucleus is given by $$ L=m_evr_n=n\hslash \implies r_n=\frac{n\hslash}{m_ev},$$ where $m_e$ is the mass of the electron, $v$ its velocity, $n$ an integer, and $r_n$ the radius of the $n$th possible orbit. Because we are concerned with the nearest orbit to the nucleus, $n=1$; and thus $$r=\frac{\hslash}{m_ev}.$$   Now, according to Coulomb's law, if the electron orbits about the nucleus the centripetal motion can be described by $$\frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\epsilon_or}=m_ev^2, $$ where $Z$ denotes the number of protons in the nucleus (the atomic number), and $e$ the elementary charge. Solving for $Z$ and substituting in $r$ from above yields $$Z=\frac{4\pi\epsilon_o \hslash v}{e^2}. $$ But what is $v$? Well, the maximum velocity an electron could ever have is the speed of light, and we wish to find the atomic number associated with an orbiting electron traveling at this speed, so we set $v=c$ and obtain our final result of $$Z=\frac{4\pi\epsilon_o\hslash c}{e^2}\approx 137.521,$$ which implies that for $Z&gt;137$, the electrons at a position of $n=1$ in the Bohr model would have a velocity $&gt;c$; and thus the highest atomic number achievable on the periodic table is 137.  Again, I just want to make sure this is a correct method for deriving element-137 before presenting. Perhaps one could explain how relativity plays a role here. I know Feynman used the Dirac equation to get this result...so could anyone (subsequently of course) expatiate on this in a simplistic manner? Thanks! Consolidate tag wiki excerpt and body contents with regards to suggested edits At the moment, in major part because they are two separate post objects in the system, the excerpt and the body of a tag wiki count as two separate posts with regards to suggested edits in the queue. Mechanically, this is sane, but when it comes to handling the actual queue, it can be confusing. A body edit might consist of little more than a bed of links, which looks bad. But then an excerpt is shown that includes the rest of the data, and since excerpts can be included on the actual wiki page, it makes a lot more sense when they're taken in the same space.  And this is how they are composed, too. The actual edit interface for working on tag wikis has both the excerpt and the body on the same page. In a sense, the excerpt behaves a lot like the "title" of the wiki, if we make a parallel to normal post edits.  Thus, my suggestion (which is to say a suggestion that I repossessed from Robert Cartaino) is that when suggested edits are reviewed for tag wikis, that they be presented in a single unit, treating the excerpt the same as how a title is treated in a question edit. This way, relevant information that is crossed between the two isn't lost because they are reviewed separately. Does Google Chrome has anything similar to about:blank page in IE and Firefox? I did not find any suitable page mentioning this? PS: I tried about:blank but it looked like Chrome is trying to load something before showing blank page... Basically I would like to use on website a "Norasi" font, that was bundled with Ubuntu, but I cannot find any license. Am I allowed to distribute that font through website? What is its license? "Absolutely continuous random variable" vs. "Continuous random variable"? In the book Limit Theorems of Probability Theory by Valentin V. Petrov, I saw a distinction between the definitions of a distribution being &quot;continuous&quot; and &quot;absolutely continuous&quot;, which is stated as follows:  &quot;...The distribution of the random variable $X$ is said to be continuous if $P\left(X \in B\right)=0$ for any finite or countable set $B$ of points of the real line. It is said to be absolutely continuous if $P\left(X \in B\right)=0$ for all Borel sets $B$ of Lebesgue measure zero...&quot;  The concept I am familiar with is:  &quot;If a random variable has a continuous Cumulative Distribution Function, then it is absolutely continuous.&quot;  My questions are: are the two descriptions about &quot;absolute continuity&quot; in (1) and (2) talking about the same thing? If yes, how can I translate one explanation into the other one? How many authors should attend a conference? I wrote a paper with  3 other students regarding my final year project in mechanical engineering. It was recently selected for a conference in NIT Delhi. Minimum one author is required to present and the price is pretty steep for the participation certificate.Should all of us attend the conference or just one of us? Does the certificate hold any value? Where did dedicated.abac.net. come from in my rDNS and PTR records? How can I vertically align elements in a div? Induction Proof: Fibonacci Numbers Identity with Sum of Two Squares Using induction, how can I show the following identity about the fibonacci numbers? I'm having trouble with simplification when doing the induction step.  Identity: $$f_n^2 + f_{n+1}^2 = f_{2n+1}$$  I get to:  $$f_{n+1}^2 + f_{n+2}^2$$  Should I replace $f_{n+2}$ using the recursion? When I do that, I end up with the product of terms, and that just doesn't seem right. Any guidance on how to get manipulate during the induction step?  Thanks! Paris has 3 airports (Orly, Roissy, Beauvais), what are the options to go to or to come from there?  (There is also Vatry (XCR) but there is very few flights and i see the shuttle system is currently off.) If I wave around a bar magnet, the magnetic field in the space around it changes. Is this enough to go through the whole speed of light derivation implying that the motion creates an electromagnetic wave? If so how do I determine the wavelength and direction of the resulting wave? If $2a_{n+2} \le a_{n+1}+a_n$, then $\lim \sup a_n \le \frac23 a_2 + \frac13 a_1$ This is a reformulation of a deleted question:  If  $a_1 &gt; 0$ and $a_2 &gt; 0$ and $2a_{n+2} \le a_{n+1}+a_n$,  show that  $\lim \sup a_n \le \frac23 a_2 + \frac13 a_1$.  My proof involves showing that $a_{n+2} \le u_{n} a_{n+1} + (1-u_n)a_n $ where $u_n \to \frac23$, and I wondered if there is a simpler proof.  I will post my proof in a couple of days if no one does. Looking for a book I read in the 90's (not sure if it was published in the 90's or not).  The story as far as I can remember goes like this. Human-looking aliens evolve on a very hostile planet. They encounter some big bad threat and they cast about for help. They encounter a rich industrialist on Earth and they send a woman to recruit him. She teaches the guy to use magic and how to transform his body. They build a ship and travel to her planet but just before they arrive, she vanishes and he crash lands on this hostile planet.  He goes through many trials and tribulations in order to get to her and eventually he has enough and uses the ability she teaches him on how to transform his body. He transforms himself into a half-man, half-dragon-like creature which allows him to travel to the other side of the planet to get to the girl. On the way he manages to neurally link into a large flying creature that flies very fast, only to discover that it is intelligent and they soon become friends. When he gets to the girl she doesn't recognise him so he gets mad and starts attacking only to realise that it's all been a test set up by these people to allow him to reach higher levels of magic.   There were supposed to be sequels but I never got around to reading them.  I remember the cover art depicted a large dragon like creature with a torso of a man and a woman standing in front of it looking back at him.  Any idea what this book may be? How to run a command that involves redirecting or piping with sudo? My first issue was when I tried to apt-get update or apt-get upgrade. On upgrade I get the following error:  You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-image-server : Depends: linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic but it is not installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.   I tried running apt-get install -f and this was the output(after saying yes on prompt)  (Reading database ... 186183 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic (from .../linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic_3.2.0-27.43_amd64.deb) ... Done. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic_3.2.0-27.43_amd64.deb (--unpack):  failed in write on buffer copy for backend dpkg-deb during `./boot/System.map-3.2.0-27-generic': No space left on device  No apport report written because the error message indicates a disk full error                                                                           dpkg-deb:    error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-27-generic   /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-27-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-27-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-27-generic Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic_3.2.0-27.43_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)   I tried running apt-get autoremove and it gives me the same error as apt-get upgrade.  When I run df, I get this for /boot:  /dev/sda1                    233191     230297         0 100% /boot   So, I read elsewhere that I should try to purge old kernels. I checked for what kernels I had with:  $ dpkg -l linux-image-\* | grep ^ii ii  linux-image-2.6.38-13-server  2.6.38-13.52  Linux kernel image for version 2.6.38 on x86_64 ii  linux-image-3.0.0-13-server   3.0.0-13.22   Linux kernel image for version 3.0.0  on x86_64 ii  linux-image-3.0.0-14-server   3.0.0-14.23   Linux kernel image for version 3.0.0  on x86_64 ii  linux-image-3.0.0-15-server   3.0.0-15.26   Linux kernel image for version 3.0.0  on x86_64 ii  linux-image-3.0.0-16-server   3.0.0-16.29   Linux kernel image for version 3.0.0  on x86_64 ii  linux-image-3.0.0-17-server   3.0.0-17.30   Linux kernel image for version 3.0.0  on x86_64 ii  linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic  3.2.0-24.39   Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0  on 64 bit x86 SMP ii  linux-image-3.2.0-25-generic  3.2.0-25.40   Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0  on 64 bit x86 SMP ii  linux-image-3.2.0-26-generic  3.2.0-26.41   Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0  on 64 bit x86 SMP   When I try to remove the oldest with this:  $ sudo apt-get purge linux-image-2.6.38-13-server Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-image-server : Depends: linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic but it is not going to be     installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution).   How can I free up or extend boot without messing up my installation? How do I load an mp4 video with multiple audio tracks into blender? Convergence of non increasing and non decreasing sequences to the same limit Ubuntu touchpad issues - mouse pointer jumps around Cannot successfully source .bashrc from a shell script Normally we can source ~/.bashrc file using this command  source ~/.bashrc   but if I write this in a shell script and execute it, nothing happens. Why? Is there any way to do this?  My script:  #!/bin/bash chmod a+x ~/.bashrc source ~/.bashrc   Also tried . (dot) instead of source. Same result. Recovering broken or deleted NTFS partitions About two weeks ago I had a problem with my PC that my brother wrote a question about at .  I still haven't solved the problem, so my PC is unusable now.  Now I think that it would be simpler to re-install both Win7 &amp; Ubuntu than repair them, but there're some data on their partitions. I want to recover this data.  These partitions are not mountable for some reason. I don't know why.  sudo fdisk -l about the problematic partitions:     Device    Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sda1            2048     147912703    73955328   83 Linux /dev/sdb2            206848   174079999    86936576    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT   And in GParted:      And the error of the mount command:  Failed to mount '/dev/sdb2': Invalid argument The device '/dev/sdb2' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?   And the exact same message for /dev/sda1  How can I recover my data from those HDDs?  EDIT     I have tried to specify the type of the drive:  $ sudo mount -t ext4 /dev/sda1 /olddisk mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda1,        missing codepage or helper program, or other error        In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try        dmesg | tail  or so $ sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb2 /olddisk NTFS signature is missing. Failed to mount '/dev/sdb2': Invalid argument The device '/dev/sdb2' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?   EDIT     sudo ntfsfix /dev/sdb2 returns:  Mounting volume... NTFS signature is missing. FAILED Attempting to correct errors... NTFS signature is missing. FAILED Failed to startup volume: Invalid argument NTFS signature is missing. Trying the alternate boot sector Unrecoverable error Volume is corrupt. You should run chkdsk.