I'm trying to get a nomenclature running in LaTeX. The problem is that the nomenclature never is printed. I got an example from :  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}  \usepackage{nomencl} \makenomenclature  \begin{document}  \nomenclature{$c$}{Speed of light in a vacuum inertial frame} \nomenclature{$h$}{Planck constant}  \printnomenclature \end{document}   Without printing errors this wouldn't even create a PDF.  I use Ubuntu 15.04, I have almost all texlive-packages installed, I compile using TexStudio and XeLaTex.  What must I do to get the nomenclature running?
I have used the package nomencl. In my code I have incorporated the \nomenclature as well. But when I compile, it is not showing me any results. My code is :  \documentclass[pdftex,12pt,a4paper]{report} \usepackage{nomencl} \makenomenclature \begin{document} ---page numbering and other things included----- \include{symbols} -----others--- \end{document}   symbols.tex  \chapter*{NOTATIONS} \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Notations} \nomenclature{$G_e$}{Equivalent Shear Modulus} \printnomenclature   Shall I use \nomenclature while explaining the chapter. Will It give me the same results? like  \documentclass[pdftex,12pt,a4paper]{report} \usepackage{nomencl} \makenomenclature \begin{document} ---page numbering and other things included----- \include{symbols} \include{chap3-calculate_w} -----others--- \end{document}   symbols.tex  \chapter*{NOTATIONS} \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Notations} \printnomenclature   chap3-calculate_w.tex  \chapter{SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED GRANULAR FILL SOFT SOIL} \label{chap:W} \section{INTRODUCTION} In this thesis, the methodology to determine an  Equivalent single layer shear modulus \nomenclature{$G_e$}{Equivalent Shear Modulus},$G_e$ value for a...etc   I am not getting the output in both these. Can someone help me with this?
Why do Jedi use lightsabers instead of blasters? Blasters seem to be more practical. Is there a special bond or something between lightsabers and Jedi? A problem of Schwarz-Pick theorem in complex analysis Set $f \in H(B(0,1)),f(B(0,1)) \subset B(0,1)$，prove that $$|f(z)-\frac{f(0)(1-|z|^2)}{1-|f(0)|^2||z|^2}| \le \frac{|z|(1-|f(0)|^2)}{1-|z|^2|f(0)|^2}$$  I think this problem is supposed to be proved by Schwarz-Pick theorem, I tried hard but failed to build a function to prove it. I even doubted that this problem is wrong, so I want to whether this problem can be proved or be falsified, and how.  Any help would be appreciated. Electrodynamics textbooks that emphasize applications Please recommend undergraduate-level textbooks on electrodynamics which emphasize practical applications and real life examples. Please describe the book's level and contents and its intended audience in as much detail as possible.   Please provide both applications from everyday life for curious students as well as engineering applications from a physics perspective. GeoTools CRS.getAxisOrder(CRS.getAxisOrder("EPSG:4326")) returns EAST_NORTH (LON_LAT) All is in the title, with GeoTools if I do :  AxisOrder order = CRS.getAxisOrder(CRS.getAxisOrder("EPSG:4326"));   It returns EAST_NORTH (= LON_LAT), but EPSG:4326 is defined as ordering latitude first and then longitude, as stated here :   So, what is happening here ? Am I doing something wrong ? If I read the sentence     Find ten apples and oranges.   Do I need to find ten or twenty pieces of fruit? Different dependencies for different build profiles Prove that $\gcd(a^n - 1, a^m - 1) = a^{\gcd(n, m)} - 1$ Where is composition tab in QGIS Composer to change page size? I am trying to change the page size in the QGIS 3.0 Composer but I am not able to see the Composition tab.  I have right clicked an empty space in the toolbar but did not see anything about composition.  I am using Windows 7.  I tried looking at the QGIS docs but they are still in testing. Trim string in JavaScript? To find minimum distance between two curves Is torque as fundamental a concept as force? I used to think that torque and force were equally “fundamental”. In other words, my understanding was that we usually use Cartesian coordinates in many common problems because it is a convenient system, so as a result instantaneous forces which act in straight lines seem “easier” mathematically but torques require some extra “baggage”. This baggage includes typically teaching that torque is defined in terms of force.  But if say we happened to choose polar coordinates for the problem the situation would appear the other way around. So it would be arbitrary if we chose to define forces in terms of torques instead.  But later on I learned that angular momentum is conserved independently of regular linear momentum (IIRC). Given the definitions of force &amp; torque as derivatives of momentum, this makes it seem much less certain that one should define either torque in terms of force or vice versa — it gives the impression they are more distinct than it first seemed.  That said, as far as I know a lot of physics is about defining &amp; describing “fundamental forces” — not “fundamental torques”.   So is choosing to use either force or torque as the basis of laws &amp; problems arbitrary? Or is there an actual fundamental rationale to when one or the other should be used? Here is the problem setup  \begin{equation} \begin{array}{c} \text{min} \hspace{4mm}  \mathbf{b}^{T}_{}\mathbf{A}^{}_{}\mathbf{b}^{}_{} \\ s.t \hspace{5mm} \mathbf{b} \in \mathbb{R}^{N} \\ \hspace{9mm}b_0=1\\ \hspace{62mm}b_i=b_{i-2}b_{i-1} \hspace{5mm} \forall \hspace{5mm} 2&lt;i\leq N-1 \end{array} \end{equation}  where $\mathbf{A}$ is a $N\times N$ positive semi-definite matrix  To handle $b_0=1$ constrain, I know I can introduce Lagrange multiplier in objective function  \begin{equation} \begin{array}{c} \text{min} \hspace{4mm}  \mathbf{b}^{T}_{}\mathbf{A}^{}_{}\mathbf{b}^{}_{} + \lambda(\mathbf{b}^{T}_{}\mathbf{u}^{}_{}-1) \end{array} \end{equation}  where $\mathbf{u}_{}^{}$ is a $N\times 1$ column vector and $u_0=1$ and $u_i=0 \forall 1&lt;i\leq N-1$.  But I dont know how to handle second set of constraints?   EDIT: Example  Let $N=4$. Therefore I am looking for $\mathbf{b}=[b_0 \quad b_1 \quad b_2 \quad b_3]^T = [1 \quad b_1 \quad b_2 \quad b_1b_2]^T$. How do I include $b_3=b_1b_2$ constraint in objective function Stopping xcode from indexing Let $f:R\rightarrow R$ be a function such that all its successive derivatives exist in all $R$ and also $f(x)f''(x)\leq 0$ everywhere.  If $\alpha$ and $\beta$ be two successive roots of $f(x)=0$.   Then prove that $f'''(x)=0$ for atleast one $\gamma \in(\alpha,\beta)$.  My Attempt:  I began by taking an example $f(x)=(x-1)(2-x)$ and let $x=1$ and $x=2$ be its two successive roots.The statement is trivially true.  Then I took the function $f(x)=e^{-x}(x-1)(2-x)$.The statement is true here also so on and so forth.  But what would be the exact proof I wonder. It appears to be a question of Rolle's Theorem. What to do if I can't get a visa to attend a conference that accepted my paper? My work got accepted into a very good category in a very good conference in my field. Due to complicated visa issues it will be very hard for me to attend that conference.   If I don't attend the conference they are certainly going to remove my work from the proceedings.  I am worried I won't be able to claim any sort of achievement if I don't attend this conference.  Can I still add it to my CV and specify that my work got accepted in this conference in a very good category? Usually I use the package mhchem for writing chemical formulas, but until now I was not able to find a solution for writing crystals such as Nd^{3+}:YAG properly with this package. When simply writing   \ce{Nd^{3+}:YAG}   it results in an error. My current alternative solution is to write it as   \ce{Nd^{3+}}:\ce{YAG}   Is there a more elegant way to do that? Example:  A tall(,) green pole.   says that cumulative adjectives don't need comma. In my example, &quot;tall&quot; describes shape, and &quot;green&quot; describes color. So they are cumulative adjectives. But  says that &quot;tall&quot; and &quot;green&quot; are equivalent and coordinate adjectives ... I'm confused. Should there be a comma or not? The words in the node of tree I want to plot this graph, but I don't know how to code the words in the nodes.     Here is my code:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{titletoc} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{trees,positioning,fit}  \begin{document}{\allowdisplaybreaks[4]}  \tikzstyle{bag} = [text width=2em, text centered] \tikzstyle{end} = []  \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}[sloped] \node (a) at ( 0,0) [bag] {$\ln r_0$}; \node (b1) at ( 3,1.5) [bag] {$\ln r_{10} + \sigma_1\sqrt{\Delta t_1}$}; \node (b2) at ( 3,-1.5) [bag] {$\ln r_{10}$}; \node (c1) at ( 6,3) [bag] {$\ln r_{20} + 2\sigma_2\sqrt{\Delta t_2}$}; \node (c2) at ( 6,1.5) [bag] {$\textrm{Mean} = \ln r_{20} + \dfrac{3}{2}\sigma_2\sqrt{\Delta t_2}$\\$\textrm{Mean Change} = \mu_{11}\Delta t_2 = \ln\dfrac{r_{20}}{r_{10}} + \dfrac{3}{2}\sigma_2\sqrt{\Delta t_2} - \sigma_1\sqrt{\Delta t_1}$}; \node (c3) at ( 6,0) [bag] {$\ln r_{20} + \sigma_2\sqrt{\Delta t_2}$}; \node (c4) at ( 6,-1.5) [bag] {$\textrm{Mean} = \ln r_{20} + \dfrac{3}{2}\sigma_2\sqrt{\Delta t_2}$\\$\textrm{Mean Change} = \mu_{11}\Delta t_2 = \ln\dfrac{r_{20}}{r_{10}} + \dfrac{3}{2}\sigma_2\sqrt{\Delta t_2} - \sigma_1\sqrt{\Delta t_1}$}; \node (c5) at ( 6,-3) [bag] {$\ln r_{20}$}; \draw [-&gt;] (a) to node [below] {} (b1); \draw [-&gt;] (a) to node [above] {} (b2); \draw [-&gt;] (b1) to node [below] {} (c1); \draw [-&gt;] (b1) to node [below] {} (c2); \draw [-&gt;] (b1) to node [below] {} (c3); \draw [-&gt;] (b2) to node [below] {} (c3); \draw [-&gt;] (b2) to node [below] {} (c4); \draw [-&gt;] (b2) to node [below] {} (c5); \end{tikzpicture} \end{center}  \end{document}       Update code use  \draw [-&gt;] (a) to node [below] {} (b1.south east); \draw [-&gt;] (a) to node [above] {} (b2.north east); \draw [-&gt;] (b1.south east) to node [below] {} (c1.west); \draw [-&gt;] (b1.south east) to node [below] {} (c2.west); \draw [-&gt;] (b1.south east) to node [below] {} (c3.west); \draw [-&gt;] (b2.north east) to node [below] {} (c3.west); \draw [-&gt;] (b2.north east) to node [below] {} (c4.west); \draw [-&gt;] (b2.north east) to node [below] {} (c5.west); How to launch the default (native) application for a given file from Java? What's the legal way to stream music online? It's really hard getting a definite answer on this so I'm going to ask it here. Is there a legal way to stream new music on a website without getting artist consent first. There seems to be a lot of popular sites like hotnewhiphop.com doing this that are hosting from both the US and Canada so I'm guessing there is a grey area that allows it. For the record I don't allow downloads of the music and simply stream each song in a player.