I have a pgfplots axis, displaying some data. The ticklabels are defined manually, so the standard font used is the base text font.   What I would like to do is to obtain tick labels using the math font of my document without putting all of my ticklabels in math mode using $ ... $.  Basically, I think I just need to add some ticklabel style={font=\mathseries} but I don't know what command to use instead of \mathseries.  I apologize in advance for this somewhat dummy question.  CLOSE EDIT     I used  in the duplicate link, not the accepted answer.   Edit: I  updated the MWE, removing mtpro2, which actually changes the output, but not the issue.  MWE  \documentclass[tikz]{standalone} \usepackage{pgfplots} \usepackage{times} \pgfplotsset{compat=newest} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}  \begin{axis}[% width=5cm, height=5cm, at={(0cm,0cm)}, scale only axis, plot box ratio=1 1 1, xmin=0, xmax=10, xtick={0,2,4,6}, % HERE THE LABELS DEPEND ON THE MATH MODE xticklabels={$0.12$,0.12,$0.345$,0.345}, ymin=-0.5,ymax=9.5, ytick=\empty, zmin=0.0000e+00, zmax=10, view={-4.4000e+01}{5.9600e+01}, axis x line*=bottom, axis y line*=left, axis z line*=left, ticklabel style={font={\footnotesize}}, ]  \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture}% \end{document}   Result without mtpro2   Result with mtpro2   As you can see, the labels within $ ... $ and the other labels have different fonts.  Edit 2 Comment regarding the use of assume math mode from pgfmanual v3.0.1a p954     /pgf/number format/assume math mode={hbooleani} (default true)   Set this to true if you don’t want any checks for math mode. The initial setting checks whether math   mode is active using \pgfutilensuremath for each final number.   Use assume math mode=true if you know that math mode is active. In that case, the final number is   typeset as-is, no further checking is performed.   Edit 3 I added a xticklabel={$\pgfmathprintnumber{\tick}$} after the xticklabels={...} call. I actually overwrites the manually defined xticklabels and uses the values in xtick but gives the desired math output...  Updated MWE  \documentclass[tikz]{standalone} \usepackage{pgfplots} \usepackage{times} \pgfplotsset{compat=newest} \pgfplotsset{xticklabel={\pgfmathprintnumber[assume math mode=true]{\tick}}} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}  \begin{axis}[% width=5cm, height=5cm, at={(0cm,0cm)}, scale only axis, plot box ratio=1 1 1, xmin=0, xmax=10, xtick={0,2,4,6}, % HERE THE LABELS DEPEND ON THE MATH MODE xticklabels={$0.12$,0.12,$0.345$,0.345}, %PRINTS THE TICKS IN MATH MODE BUT NOT THE MANUALLY SET TICKLABELS xticklabel={$\pgfmathprintnumber{\tick}$}, ymin=-0.5,ymax=9.5, ytick=\empty, zmin=0.0000e+00, zmax=10, view={-4.4000e+01}{5.9600e+01}, axis x line*=bottom, axis y line*=left, axis z line*=left, ticklabel style={font={\footnotesize}}, ] \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture}% \end{document}
Preface:  An axis plotted with  is usually using the current math font for its ticklabels. But if they are overwritten by e.g. xticklabels={-8,-6,...,8} then the current text font is used. Also an axis label ylabel={Y} would be in text font unless put explicitly in math mode ylabel={$Y$}. However it would be nice, if  one hadn't to do so.   Question:  I'm aiming to ensure that pgfplots always uses the current math font. But please assume that the classic font commands like \rmfamily are screwed up by the corporate design I'm supposed to use, e.g. assume: \renewcommand{\rmdefault}{\sfdefault}  It works if I explicitly define a font  \newcommand{\pgfmathfont}{\fontfamily{pxfonts}\selectfont}   and pass it to pgfplots together with assume math mode=true:  \begin{axis}[ font = \pgfmathfont,  tick label style={/pgf/number format/assume math mode=true} ]   But it requires that I insert the name of the current math font. How can I do that automatically? How to get the currently used math font to insert it into the macro?    MWE  \documentclass{beamer}  \usetheme{Warsaw} \usefonttheme{professionalfonts} \usepackage{pxfonts} \usepackage{pgfplots}  % screwed up by Corporate Design \renewcommand{\rmdefault}{\sfdefault}  % I'd like this line to be generic! \newcommand{\pgfmathfont}{\fontfamily{pxfonts}\selectfont} %           put current math font here   X  \begin{document}  \begin{frame}  This is a basic equation:    \[ x + y = 42\]  \begin{tikzpicture}     \begin{axis}[ %   font = \rmfamily, % makes no sense here     font = \pgfmathfont,      xlabel={$x$-label: I want to be in math font!},     ylabel={Y},     xtick={-4,-3,...,4},     xticklabels={-8,-6,...,8}, %   xticklabels={$-8$,$-6$,...,$8$}, % does not work     tick label style={/pgf/number format/assume math mode=true}     ]      \addplot {x^2};      \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture}  \end{frame}  \end{document}     Everything related to  is no option at all!  Thank you!
If my app is live and users are facing a critical issue, can I upload another build and ask Apple to make it live within a day or two? What is the best option for South America Brazil to configure: provider.get_backend (''), because melbourne_16 is very slow. I haven't seen this behavior out in the wild much, but it happened again recently and I was wondering if a flag could be automatically raised when this happens:   User posts answer Answer is down voted User deletes answer User posts exact same text as a new answer User effectively ditched down votes   Got down voted again? Wash, rinse and repeat. Profit (perhaps after modifying the post, which is what you should have done to begin with)    I feel that this should raise a duplicate content flag, with slightly stronger wording. Would this be possible to implement? Or, perhaps, don't let users post new answers if they have a deleted answer to a question. Rather, force them to edit and restore the deleted answer instead, unless locked by a moderator.  I do have a link, but I don't want a lot of people to descend on it and create an even bigger disruption. It happened exactly as I described. How does QGIS Zonal Statistics handle partially overlapping pixels? I prefer to use bm package to bold math. However, I noticed that when used with eulervm, this gives inconsistent results for ‘&lt;’ and ‘>’ characters.  I wonder what causes it and can the usage bm be fixed to get proper ‘&lt;’.  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}  %\usepackage{amsmath}  \usepackage[euler-digits,euler-hat-accent]{eulervm}  \usepackage{bm}  \begin{document}      \texttt{\hphantom{mathbold}\llap{bm}}: \quad $ 1 + 1 &lt; 3; \quad \bm{1 + 1 &lt; 3} $      \texttt{mathbold}: \quad $ 1 + 1 &lt; 3; \quad \mathbold{1 + 1 &lt; 3} $  \end{document} Determine the Galois group of the polynomial $(x^3-2)(x^3-3)(x^2-2)$ over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt {-3})$ Determine the Galois group of the polynomial $(x^3-2)(x^3-3)(x^2-2)$ over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt {-3})$.   I tried to decompose the splitting field into a tower, but then it is very complicated in each step and since the degree is large, I cannot determine the group by guessing. It seems to me that Kummer theory might work, but there are $2$-degree and $3$-degree factors. How can I limit ssh *remote* port forwarding? I need to limit which ports can be remotely 'ssh -R' forwarded by an user.  I know about permitopen option on authorized_keys, but as it says on man page it only limits local 'ssh -L' port forwarding  As discussed  a user would get the same with netcat or similar, but in this case user has no shell access  I also found  that talks about using selinux or LD_PRELOAD, but I never configured selinux before and can't find info on how to do that with LD_PRELOAD.  maybe someone have made a patch for openssh to implement that?  EDIT: I've found  so I guess it's not yet implemented Multiple Author and email with location? I am trying to add multiple Author with their email and location but not working.  I am trying to get something like this     first_person^1 , second person^2, third_person^3            {1^mail, 2^mail, 3^mail}@gmail.com                   institution name                      location In Episode III,  explains to Anakin the power of the Dark Side to save people from death. He mentions  - the Sith who discovered this. Sidious then claims he died, which seems odd, given that kind of power.   Then in Episode VII (The Force Awakens) we find a Sith Lord who has appeared from no where. There seems to be two loose ends that fit nicely together.   My question is: Is there evidence to suggest that Supreme Leader Snoke is Darth Plagueis? "To your left" versus "on your left" There is a security camera on the building to your left      There is a security camera on the building on your left   Is there any real difference in meaning here? Which sounds more natural to native speakers? Apex Array Slice Sometimes I like to use a Queueable to perform work on a list of Ids or sObjects over the heaver Batchable Interface.   However, to do this, we need a very solid implementation of an Array slice method.  Most other programming languages have a native slice method, but Apex does not.  While I have written my own version of slice and it's working fine, I would be interested in hearing about other implementations of slice - the more efficient the better.  My version is in this Utilities class on github   It's modelled after the Javascript version described on the mozilla site   I would expect that the usage and output be similar to this:  String[] arr = ['zero', 'one', 'two', 'three']; String[] sliced = Utilities.slice(arr,1, 3);  System.debug(arr);      // ['zero', 'one', 'two', 'three'] System.debug(sliced);   // ['one', 'two'] Does it feel lately like all questions have already been asked and answered and there is nothing more to do? I think everybody with a history of participation can't help but notice the explosive growth of repeated duplicate questions. The work of looking for duplicates and then closing questions has overtaken the work of actually answering questions.  It's become virtually impossible to ask something which hasn't been yet asked. Lately I feel boredom each time I see a new question and start answering it only to realize after the first written sentence that I have answered similar questions five times over or seen them answered some ten times or more. I know where it's going to be going and what answers with what votes it is going to receive before any answer is even written.  It's obviously not the administration's fault, it is simply so. The questions is, what to do about it? Engaging more moderators to close and close duplicates won't work because it's already starting to repel users who get mad at their questions closed and become afraid of asking more or perhaps just go away.  The original idea of Jeff stated the the site is for questions that can be answered. Meaning no open-ended discussions. When I first read this I had a casual thought - well, and what's gonna happen when they all are asked and answered? Will it become a museum, a monument of wisdom and knowledge or what?  I'm not sure what to do about it. Perhaps deprecation/versioning of older questions so that their new versions can sparkle the tiresome evening...  POSTSCRIPTUM.  I recall Star Trek Voyager episode  when another Q asked Captain Janeway for asylum. He was tired of immortality and wanted to die. They opened a hearing and went on to visit the continuum to evaluate the living conditions there which caused the suffering and the wish to escape it in death. A lifeless picture presented itself to the visitors... a house lone in an open space, two people going about their business, nobody talking. When asked why they were silent, the following was said. It's been so long, all has already been said, all stories told, all jokes are made... there is nothing left to do...  Are we there as well?  UPDATE: Just saw this answer in another question:       Also, some of the core questions got asked early on in the life of the site. Great questions still come around from time to time, but many have already been asked.   Doesn't that confirm my point? Background  Suppose we have an Ordinary Least Squares model where we have $k$ coefficients in our regression model, $$\mathbf{y}=\mathbf{X}\mathbf{\beta} + \mathbf{\epsilon}$$  where $\mathbf{\beta}$ is an $(k\times1)$ vector of coefficients, $\mathbf{X}$ is the design matrix defined by  $$\mathbf{X} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 &amp; x_{11} &amp; x_{12} &amp; \dots &amp; x_{1\;(k-1)} \\ 1 &amp; x_{21} &amp; \dots  &amp;       &amp;   \vdots \\ \vdots &amp;   &amp; \ddots &amp;       &amp;   \vdots \\ 1 &amp; x_{n1} &amp; \dots  &amp; \dots &amp;   x_{n\;(k-1)}     \end{pmatrix}$$ and the errors are IID normal,  $$\mathbf{\epsilon} \sim \mathcal{N}\left(\mathbf{0},\sigma^2 \mathbf{I}\right) \;.$$  We minimize the sum-of-squared-errors by setting our estimates for $\mathbf{\beta}$ to be $$\mathbf{\hat{\beta}}= (\mathbf{X^T X})^{-1}\mathbf{X}^T \mathbf{y}\;. $$   An unbiased estimator of $\sigma^2$ is  $$s^2 = \frac{\left\Vert \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{\hat{y}}\right\Vert ^2}{n-p}$$ where $\mathbf{\hat{y}} \equiv \mathbf{X} \mathbf{\hat{\beta}}$ ().   The covariance of $\mathbf{\hat{\beta}}$ is given by $$\operatorname{Cov}\left(\mathbf{\hat{\beta}}\right) = \sigma^2 \mathbf{C}$$ where $\mathbf{C}\equiv(\mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{X})^{-1}$ () .  Question  How can I prove that for $\hat\beta_i$, $$\frac{\hat{\beta}_i - \beta_i} {s_{\hat{\beta}_i}} \sim t_{n-k}$$ where $t_{n-k}$ is a t-distribution with $(n-k)$ degrees of freedom, and the standard error of $\hat{\beta}_i$ is estimated by $s_{\hat{\beta}_i} = s\sqrt{c_{ii}}$.    My attempts  I know that for $n$ random variables sampled from $x\sim\mathcal{N}\left(\mu, \sigma^2\right)$, you can show that  $$\frac{\bar{x}-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}} \sim t_{n-1} $$ by rewriting the LHS as $$\frac{ \left(\frac{\bar x - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}}\right)  }   {\sqrt{s^2/\sigma^2}}$$ and realizing that the numertor is a standard normal distribution, and the denominator is square root of a Chi-square distribution with df=(n-1) and divided by (n-1) ().  And therefore it follows a t-distribution with df=(n-1) ().  I was unable to extend this proof to my question...  Any ideas?  I'm aware of , but they don't explicitly prove it, they just give a rule of thumb, saying "each predictor costs you a degree of freedom". Speed of object towards a point not in the object's trajectory? A limit ordinal $\gamma&gt;0$ is said to be indecomposable iff $\nexists\alpha,\beta&lt;\gamma$ such that $\alpha+\beta=\gamma$.  In view of this definition, I’m trying to prove the equivalence of the following statements for limit ordinals $\gamma$:  (1) $\gamma$ is indecomposable.  (2) $\alpha+\gamma=\gamma$ $\forall\alpha&lt;\gamma$.  (3) $\gamma=\omega^\alpha$ for some $\alpha\in\mathrm{ON}$.  I’ve been able to get $(1)\implies(2)$ and $(3)\implies(1)$, but I have nothing more than scratch work for $(2)\implies(3)$.  Any suggestions would be appreciated. Extra blue line appearing in the top bar (Firefox only) Whenever we click on the Inbox or the Achievements in the top bar, an extra blue line appears near by them. This is reproducible on Stack Overflow and Anime &amp; Manga(as I use only those) but not on Meta Stack Overflow. Here is a snapshot of that.    I'm using Firefox 25.0.1 on Win7 Pro.  Edit: Just to be double sure, I restarted the FF and still I'm able to see it. Here is another snapshot, with the 2 distinct sites. Are the LIGO observations proof of a black hole merger, and what happened to the black holes? Recent reports claim that the gravitational waves detected by LIGO match up with the signal expected from two black holes merging as predicted by general relativity.  Additionally, the masses of both black holes were estimated. Questions:  How certain are we that the detected of gravitational waves are necessarily from two black holes merging?  Since supermassive black holes are typically at the center of a host galaxy, what happened to the galaxies that contained the two merging black holes?  For example, did their host galaxies merge?    Edit After reading the answers, I understand that the signals detected by LIGO are proof of the validity of gravitational wave generational artifacts as predicted by general relativity.  When additionally gravitational waves, caused by the merger of the supermassive black holes (those which ARE indeed located in the centers of the merging galaxies) will be detected, since mergers of galaxies could be observed by the methods independent of gravitational waves such as registering the fact of the quasar appearance (). Additional questions:  Could someone offer me the historical ASTRONOMY precedent when the second degree of inference (from the mathematical model, being associated with the theory of Physics) was accepted as the discovery of the astronomical object?  Could someone give a reference to trustable scientific publication, with the subject of study being discussion of requirements satisfying claim of astronomical discovery of an astronomical object?  Have independent scientific sources (outside of members of the LIGO team) analyzed methodology and results of the LIGO signal detection, and published their conclusions with regards of what was actually discovered? What are the differences between vector graphics and raster graphics? Prove that $f$ analytic, $f(x) \in \mathbb{R}$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ implies $f(\overline{z})=\overline{f(z)}$ Let $U\subset \mathbb{C}$ be a nonempty connected open set such that for every $z\in U$, $\overline z\in U$.  Let $f$ be analytic on $U$. Suppose $f(x)\in\mathbb R$ for every $x\in U\cap\mathbb R$. Prove that $f(\overline{z})=\overline{f(z)}$ for any $z \in U$.    By definition, I know that $f$ analytic on $U$ means that for every $z_0 \in U$, there exists $r&gt;0$ and a sequence of complex numbers $\left(a_n\right)_{n=0}^\infty$ such that $f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n\left(z-z_0\right)^n$ on the disc $D(z_0,r)\subseteq U$. I see that $f$ takes points without imaginary components to other points without imaginary components. But I don't see how this implies a symmetry that $f(\overline{z})=\overline{f(z)}$ for $z \in \mathbb C \setminus \mathbb R$. It seems like a very strong conclusion and I'm not sure how I would prove it.  I have also shown in the preceding question that $U\cap\mathbb R$ contains an open interval, however I am not sure if that detail is meant to be helpful to this question. The following quote from  assumes "the URL" comes from somewhere and uses it to restrict the Host header. Where does "the URL" come from? Is it from the first line of a HTTP request (e.g. after GET), or from the input to a web client (e.g. an argument to curl, or the input in the address bar of a web browser)? Thanks.     The Host header specifies the Internet host and port number for the   resource being requested, as obtained from the original URL:  Host = "Host" ":" host [ ":" port ]       In particular:      • If the Host header does not contain a port, the default port for the   scheme is assumed.      • If the URL contains an IP address, the Host header should contain   the same address.      • If the URL contains a hostname, the Host header must contain the   same name.      • If the URL contains a hostname, the Host header should not contain   the IP address equivalent to the URL’s hostname, because this will   break virtually hosted servers, which layer multiple virtual sites   over a single IP address.      • If the URL contains a hostname, the Host header should not contain   another alias for this hostname, because this also will break   virtually hosted servers.