I have gone through the entire about page for meta.stackexchange.com site thoroughly but I can still find no Informed badge awarded in my profile; why is that so? Is it some kind of technical error on the website?
There is an "Informed" badge for reading the meta about page but it was awarded zero times and to make sure I tried reading the about page but did not receive it. If the badge is to be awarded here, then this should be 'fixed'. If not, it should be removed from the list of badges.
I know this subject was discussed for many times, but I still don't get it..  I've read in a book that we can use "I've got" instead of "I have" for possesion and it gave some examples,      I've got an English book.   I've got a red car.   So I understand that it can be used only for possession of physical objects, but I saw it used in sentences like "I've got something to say", is it correct? I hope it's not a stupid question..Thank you very much! Errors "*ERROR* UVD not responding, trying to reset the VCPU!!!" Consecutive spoiler blocks (>!) are shown as blockquotes The markdown &gt;! a  &gt;! b  &gt;! c  Will be shown as a blockquote with ! in front of it:   a    b    c  Instead of a spoiler for 3 paragraphs (or 3 spoiler blocks, whatever). Let p be a prime. Consider the equation $\frac1x+\frac1y=\frac1p$. What are the solutions? Write down the set of distinct solutions and prove your list is complete. $x$ and $y$ are positive integers.  I have rewritten it as $\frac{(x+y)}{xy} = \frac1p$, but I don't understand where to go from here? Let $B$ be a real Banach Space whose dimension is at least $2$, and let $S$ be a subset of $B$ that is an open ball. Is the complement of $S$ (with respect to $B$) always connected?  Idea One could then perhaps make use of the facts that every $2$-dimensional Banach space is homeomorphic to the Euclidean plane and that - for the Euclidean plane - my question has an obvious &quot;YES&quot; answer (since every open ball is the interior of a circle). Why does $\lim_{n\to\infty} z_n=A$ imply $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}(z_1+\cdots+z_n)=A$? I'm self-studying a bit of complex analysis, and I'm attempting to figure out the following.   Suppose $\lim_{n\to\infty}z_n=A$. How can I show that $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}(z_1+\cdots+z_n)=A. $$  Is there a clever way to write the limit to make it more approachable? Thank you. Hair particles render not same as 3dView(Eevee) How to check if installing a package will require a reboot? I often install packages and updates for them, although sometimes it is not convenient to do a reboot if one of the packages needs it, so is there any way of telling BEFORE installing the package/update whether or not it will require you to do a reboot? I have already looked  and the solutions there don't solve my problem, nor the more or less same one described there. How to find all subgroups of a direct product? I am wondering how do we find all subgroups of a direct product? Is there a method to find it?  For example, how can we find all the subgroups of $\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2$?  There is the answer: $\{(0, 0), (1, 0)\}, \{(0, 0), (0, 1)\}, \{(0, 0), (1, 1)\}$, and the improper and trivial subgroup. But I do not know the method how to find it.   All I can think about is the following: since the order of $\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2$ is $4$, the order of a subgroup of it can be $1,2$ or $4$.   If order is $1$, then it is trivial, and if order is $4$, it is proper. Then, the order of a subgroup is $2$. We know all the elements of   $\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2$, so we try all the pairs.   Is that the method?   But what if we are given a bigger order product, such as $\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_8\times\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_9$? It looks very long to try all possibilities.   Can anyone help?  Thanks Is there a way to disable file:/// protocol in google chrome?  Is there some option, or some switches that can disable this feature?  Please help More than one optional argument for newcommand The \newcommand macro allows to use an optional argument for the first parameter #1 with:  \newcommand{\mycommand}[3][defaultfor1]{blah blah blah}   Is it possible to have more than one option with \newcommand? Polynomial in $n$ variables Is it normal for DC wall adapter power supplies to provide voltages above the nominal ones? When I measure a 9V DC wall adapter power supply with a multimeter it shows 11.8V. When connected to my board this voltage lowers to 10V. Is this normal? Should I be afraid of toasting my  supplied board when using this adapter?  Edit: This regulator accepts up to 12V inputs. So that will be no problem. A second "9V" adapter yields 15V to the multimeter. Will this one burn my circuit? How do I get console output in C++ with a Windows program? Does a logistic regression maximizing likelihood necessarily also maximize AUC over linear models? Setting post meta data to random value during post status transition / on publish In his first lesson (transcripted in "Tips on Physics"), Feynman talks about math for physicists in a very cool and practical way. And at the end of the section he talks something like "so the first thing to do is to learn to learn derivative, integral and algebra" (I don't know how much precise I'm being because I've read it in Portuguese). I would to know if there is some book that deals with math as Feynman did it in this lesson (respecting formalities, but teaching how to use the practical rules)? Also, someone have any recommendations for algebra book (college level)? Disable UpdateOrchestrator Reboot task LIGO has announced the detection of gravitational waves on 11 Feb, 2016. I was wondering why the detection of gravitational waves was so significant?   I know it is another confirmation of general relativity (GR), but I thought we had already confirmed GR beyond much doubt. What extra stuff would finding gravitational waves teach us? Is the detection of gravitational waves significant in and of itself, or is there data which can be extracted from the waves which will be more useful? Cannot install Ubuntu in VirtualBox due to "this kernel requires an x86-64 CPU, but only detects an i686 CPU, unable to boot" error I was trying to install Ubuntu 12.04 in VirtualBox 4.2.12r84980. I see    this kernel requires an x86-64 CPU, but only detects an i686 CPU, unable to boot   But I am using a 64 bit Windows 8, and trying same .iso for trying Ubuntu. Then what is the problem?