What is the maximum length of a HTTP cookie in different browsers? What is the maximum length of a HTTP cookie in different browsers? Does it differ between browsers?  Does the HTTP protocol dictate it?
What is the maximum size of a web browser's cookie's key? What is the maximum size of a web browser's cookie's key?  I know the maximum size of a cookie is 4KB, but does the key have a limitation as well?
In De Broglie's Explanation for Bohr's Quantization Condition, why do we not use 2πr = n λ/2, why do we use 2πr = n λ? In de Broglie's explanation for Bohr's quantization condition, why do we not use $2\pi r = n\lambda/2$, why do we use $2\pi r = n\lambda$?  We know that in waves on strings, for standing waves creation in a string between two rigid supports, we use "Length of String" $ = n \lambda/2$. Why do we not use a similar concept here? In my native language, we can say:     I have dog   Because I don't want to say a dog (one dog, how many dogs) or the dog (that dog, the listener don't care which dog).  p.s. after 3 years later, I have to say, why I ask this question, is I still cannot grasp how to use the right 'article word'. sometimes, a noun will use an article, sometimes, a noun could not(or omit) the article word before it. there aren't a formula for this. So, I have to remember all the time! I feel so frustrate Are there any disadvantages to using your companions for transporting Power Armor After I read that companions don't drain the fusion core of a Power Armor when wearing it, I decided to try giving my armor to Nick so I'll always have it close by if I need it.  But I was wondering if there are any other drawbacks to that. For example, does the Armor get damaged or destroyed when the companion is under fire? I'm getting errors in a matrix equation. When I compile it looks fine, but I'd like to fix them so I don't have to press return for every error at compile time. The code for the equation is:  \begin{equation*}  \begin{bmatrix} U(1,t)  &amp; \cdots &amp; U(n,t) \\  \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots \\ O_{n1} &amp; \cdots &amp; O_{nn}  \end{bmatrix} \times \begin{bmatrix} W(1,1)  &amp; \cdots &amp; W(1,n) \\  \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots \\  W(n,1) &amp; \cdots &amp; W(n,n)  \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}  D(1,t)  &amp; \cdots &amp; D(n,t) \\ \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots \\ I_{n1} &amp; \cdots &amp; I_{nn} \end{bmatrix}  \end{equation*}   The errors I'm getting are related to missing $'s inserted. Can I get back my saved data? How to make horizontal lists? This might seem like a very simple question, but what is the easiest way to turn a normal vertical list into a horizontal one? Can Kakashi still use Susanoo after losing his Sharingan? When Kakashi had double Sharingan, he was able to use Susanoo. However, he lost the Sharingan.  Can he still use Susanoo without Sharingan now? Cut points and connected space Java OS X Lion Set application name doesn't work What's the term when you ask a question which implies a lie? Can a shell script set environment variables of the calling shell? I'm trying to write a shell script that, when run, will set some environment variables that will stay set in the caller's shell.  setenv FOO foo   in csh/tcsh, or  export FOO=foo   in sh/bash only set it during the script's execution.  I already know that   source myscript   will run the commands of the script rather than launching a new shell, and that can result in setting the "caller's" environment.  But here's the rub:  I want this script to be callable from either bash or csh.  In other words, I want users of either shell to be able to run my script and have their shell's environment changed.  So 'source' won't work for me, since a user running csh can't source a bash script, and a user running bash can't source a csh script.  Is there any reasonable solution that doesn't involve having to write and maintain TWO versions on the script? Missing Microsoft.Data.Services.Client version 5.6 on Azure Websites In my question's preview, the attached image looks rotated. So, assuming you are able to see it in the real orientation, can anyone determine what is that dust flake type thing on the top, slightly towards the left?   One looks like a dust flake and there's another dot to the left of it?  Note: I wont have physical access to the camera until the weekend.  Is it just a dust flake on the lens or can it be some problem with the sensor? Its a 3 month old Canon 1500D. How do you select elements based on their style? Using jQuery, how would you find elements which have a particular style (eg: float: left), regardless of whether it's an inline style or one defined in a CSS file? Can you use the /testfor command in minecraft 1.8 to find out if a player has died ?  I need it for my map, where 2 players (Only) are pitted against eachother. I want it so that when one of them dies, it will detect the death and declare the victor. I really like the , where certain questions from the Stack Exchange Network are presented, along with a hotness rating that is described as &quot;arbitrary&quot; in its tooltip. Such questions also appear randomly on the sidebar on sites across the network, under the heading &quot;Hot Network Questions&quot;. How do these arbitrary hotness points work, and how are they used to select questions to appear in those lists? a better way to express "an idea/thought suddenly came to me" What are some grandiloquent, or simply better, ways of expressing "an idea/thought suddenly came to me", or "an idea/thought struck me", or "I was struck by an idea/thought"? Who owns R2-D2 & C-3PO in the Prequel trilogy? Is there any concrete evidence that Anakin officially owned R2-D2 or C-3PO?  I found this episode of Star Wars: Clone Wars that shows it, but it's fairly vague... Is it true that $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{R}^2$ are isomorphic as abelian groups? I think the answer is yes.   Sketch of the proof Consider $\mathbb{R}$ as a vector space over $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $\{e_\lambda:\lambda\in\Lambda\}\subset\mathbb{R}$ be its Hamel basis. Then $\{(e_{\lambda_1},e_{\lambda_2}):\lambda_1,\lambda_2\in\Lambda\}\subset\mathbb{R}^2$ is a Hamel basis of $\mathbb{R}^2$. Consider set theoretic bijection $i:\Lambda\to\Lambda\times\Lambda$ define map $\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^2$ by its action on element of Hamel basis of $\mathbb{R}$ by equality $\varphi(e_\lambda)=(e_{i(\lambda)_1},e_{i(\lambda)_2})$. This is an isomorphism between $\mathbb{Q}$-vector spaces $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{R}^2$.  Question Could you tell me is this proof correct, and if it is not, where is the mistake?  EDIT: Thanks to GAJO we found that this proof is wrong. The correct one basis is  $$ \{(e_\lambda,0):\lambda\in \Lambda\}\cup\{(0,e_\lambda):\lambda\in\Lambda\} $$ So we had to look at bijections of the form $i:\Lambda\to\Lambda\coprod\Lambda$ and the desired linear operator is defined by equalities $\varphi(e_\lambda)=(e_{i(\lambda)},0)$ if $i(\lambda)$ lies in the first copy $\Lambda$ and $\varphi(e_\lambda)=(0,e_{i(\lambda)})$ otherwise. How is ** implemented in Python? I'm wondering where I find the source to show how the operator ** is implemented in Python.  Can someone point me in the right direction?