Tumbleweed badge - do close votes alter the outcome? The above question has been open for well over a week now, it's got no comments, no answers and only 23 views or so (judging by Jeff's answer  that shouldn't be the factor anyway!)  It does have one close vote though, that's the only thing I can think of?  All the other questions about this seem to have been resolved when the user already had the tumbleweed badge - I however don't!  Any ideas?
What are the badges I can earn on each site, and what are the exact criteria for earning each badge? Formerly List of all badges with full descriptions.  What are badge name's requirements? Why didn't I get badge name ? Which badges can I earn multiple times?    Jump to:                    Note: Some badges are awarded based on score. The term score means the total number of upvotes minus the total number of downvotes.  Any badge with a *** next to it is one of 20 badges that count towards the  displayed on a moderator candidate in an election. The candidate score is a total of 40 points: the first 20 are awarded based on the user's rep divided by 1000 and rounded down; the second 20 represents the total number of unique badges earned of the 20 that count. Note that if the same badge is earned multiple times, it will only count once towards the candidate score.  Any badge with a &quot;(retired)&quot; next to it is no longer awarded, but is retained by users who previously earned them. See  for more info on what it means for a badge to be retired.       Visit the  of the  on any site to see a complete list of badges that you can filter by earned, unearned, or type.
In 1D why are vectors, such as, e.g., velocity $v$ and acceleration $a$, not written with a vector arrow? In my textbook instantaneous velocity and acceleration are wrote only as $v$ and $a$ in the chapter of One dimensional motion. Instead, in two dimensional motion chapter they are written with the "arrow" symbol upon them, $\vec{v}$ and $\vec{a}$.  Why if they are both vectors they don't have an arrow in that particular chapter? I just can't get it. Grammar-checking tool for use with LaTeX? I am looking for a grammar-checking tool, i.e., something that checks for mistakes such as "two dog" or "a books".  It has to work on Linux (Ubuntu).  Also, since I use macros to generate some of the prose, it has to somehow work with LaTeX.  I don't think that such checkers are LaTeX-aware, so it has to work with some compilation product of LaTeX: DVI or PDF.    If you suggest a grammar checker that checks plain text, please explain how to you extract the text.  catdvi does a nice job, but it leaves some garbage like page numbers. Where can I safely store my stuff? Why is it that many of the most important physical equations don't have ugly numbers (i.e., "arbitrary" irrational factors) to line up both sides?   Why can so many equations be expressed so neatly with small natural numbers while recycling a relatively small set of physical and mathematical constants?  For example, why is mass–energy equivalence describable by the equation $E = mc^2$ and not something like $E \approx 27.642 \times mc^2$?  Why is time dilation describable by something as neat as $t' = \sqrt{\frac{t}{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ and not something ugly like $t' \approx 672.097 \times 10^{-4} \times \sqrt{\frac{t}{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$.  ... and so forth.    I'm not well educated on matters of physics and so I feel a bit sheepish asking this.   Likewise I'm not sure if this is a more philosophical question or one that permits a concrete answer ... or perhaps even the premise of the question itself is flawed ... so I would gratefully consider anything that sheds light on the nature of the question itself as an answer.    EDIT: I just wished to give a little more context as to where I was coming from with this question based on some of the responses:  @Jerry Schirmer comments:      You do have an ugly factor of $2.997458 \times 10^8 m/s$ in front of everything. You just hide the ugliness by calling this number c.   These are not the types of "ugly constants" I'm talking about in that this number is the speed of light. It is not just some constant needed to balance two side of an equation.  @Carl Witthoft answers:      It's all in how you define the units ...   Of course this is true, we could in theory hide all sorts of ugly constants by using different units on the right and the left. But as in the case of $E=mc^2$, I am talking about equations where the units on the left are consistent with the units on the right, irrespective of the units used. As I mentioned on a comment there:     $E=mc^2$  could be defined using units like $m$ in imperial stones ($\textsf{S}$), $c$ in cubits/fortnight ($\textsf{CF}^{−1}$) and $E$ in ... umm ... $\textsf{SC}^2\textsf{F}^{−2}$ ... so long as the units are in the same system, we still don't need a fudge factor.   When the units are consistent in this manner, there's no room for hiding fudge constants. HDD SMART interpretation - Possible impending drive failure I've just had an issue pop up related to my drives.  First things first, I was working in my case when I clumsily shifted the foot of the case off of my desk. Case shifted and hit the desk somewhat hard, but only fell an inch or two. It had been properly shut down so this may not have anything to do with the issue.  After booting up, I noticed that when playing a video from my F: Drive (Seagate), it produced a whine, almost a chirping sound coming from the hard drive bay. I think I may have heard this before the drop, but quieter.  Fearing impending failure I downloaded GSmartControl and inspected the drive information. The Seagate drive displayed a high Raw Read Error Rate, as well as a high Seek Error Rate.  I've read some of these values can be high on Seagate drives from the start. This drive is about 6 months old and the producer of the noise.  I also checked my Toshiba drive, which came with a refurbished prebuilt I bought about a year ago. It showed more normal SMART data, but displayed some concerning statistics (2 "Mechanical Start Failures" and 2 "Reported Uncorrectable Errors").  Both of the drives passed the basic SMART test, but the noise was quite alarming. It would stop as soon as a paused the video and start right up again as soon as I resumed playing.  Here is an album with 3 photos of the SMART data, the Seagate did not display statistics.  Could I please have help interpreting the SMART data, and whether this may indicate an impending failure?   Thank you for your time.   Here are images of the SMART data. Grub: reboot to specific kernel I'd like to ask for help getting grub-reboot to work.  The theory: According to  (and other sources) I should be able to choose the kernel for the next reboot, using grub-reboot. However, this does not work for me; grub always boots to the default kernel.  Here's what I tried:  $ grep GRUB_DEFAULT /etc/default/grub GRUB_DEFAULT=saved $ grep "menuentry " /boot/grub/grub.cfg  menuentry 'Ubuntu' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-simple-f3a807d1-3fd6-4970-b741-5382e9801060' {     menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 4.4.0-43-generic' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.4.0-43-generic-advanced-f3a807d1-3fd6-4970-b741-5382e9801060' {     menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 4.4.0-43-generic (recovery mode)' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.4.0-43-generic-recovery-f3a807d1-3fd6-4970-b741-5382e9801060' {     menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 4.4.0-36-generic' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.4.0-36-generic-advanced-f3a807d1-3fd6-4970-b741-5382e9801060' {     menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 4.4.0-36-generic (recovery mode)' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.4.0-36-generic-recovery-f3a807d1-3fd6-4970-b741-5382e9801060' {  # Version 1, using the name $ sudo grub-reboot "Ubuntu, with Linux 4.4.0-36-generic"  # Version 2, using the id $ sudo grub-reboot gnulinux-4.4.0-36-generic-advanced-f3a807d1-3fd6-4970-b741-5382e9801060  # Version 3, counting $ sudo grub-reboot 3   Neither of these commands seem to have an effect; after reboot, I always end up with the 4.4.0-43 kernel.  Note: This is on Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial. It is a server machine and I don't have access to the console during boot, so I can't look at the grub menu :( The question is as follows.  Imagine we have two closed geodesics on a surface, where these two geodesics bound a cylinder together and the geodesics are diffeomorphic to circles.  Can the cylinder have $K&gt;0$ everywhere or $K&lt;0$ everywhere?  Here $K$ is Gaussian Curvature.   What's confusing me about this question is that a cylinder has Gaussian Curvature of $K=0$ everywhere, so wouldn't the answer to both questions be no?  But then I don't get the point of the question with the geodesics.  Thank you in advance Why do I get a black rectangle instead of my external picture? I write some of my network notes in TeX. I wanted to make a table, and inside it insert an image:   .   I wrote a document:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[demo]{graphicx} \usepackage{booktabs} \usepackage{array}  \begin{document} \begin{tabular}{m{3cm}m{3cm}m{5cm}} \toprule Configuration for ... &amp; Commands &amp; Topology\\ \midrule PPP: CHAP, PAP &amp; \#sh int se 0/0/0  &amp; \includegraphics[width=4cm, height=4cm]{chappap.png}\\  &amp; &amp; \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{document}   But instead of my network topology image, I see only this: .   I don't know what is wrong, cause my image is 100% in the same dir, as my *.tex file.  EDIT:  Changed my code as @Jubobs suggested, now everything is as I wanted:  \documentclass{article}     \usepackage{graphicx}     \usepackage{booktabs}     \usepackage{array}      \begin{document}     \begin{tabular}{m{3cm}m{3cm}m{5cm}}     \toprule     Configuration for ... &amp; Commands &amp; Topology\\     \midrule     PPP: CHAP, PAP &amp; \#sh int se 0/0/0  &amp; \includegraphics[width=4cm, height=4cm]{chappap.png}\\      &amp; &amp; \\     \bottomrule     \end{tabular}     \end{document} Analogy: "as if" vs. "as though" This is something that confuses me from time to time. When making an analogy in literature, is it better to use the phrase "as if" or "as though", or is it completely a style thing?  E.g.      She looked frazzled, as if she had just gotten off of a roller coaster.   or     She looked frazzled, as though she had just gotten off of a roller coaster. WINDOWS 10 - Error Windows Update 10 = Error in phase " SAFE_OS " with the operator error with " BOOT " For days I tried several ways to install Windows 10 . With Windows Update I have always an error and with the media creation tool microsoft I have this message: " The installation failed in SAFE_OS phase with an error when BOOT operator " with this code : 0xC1900101 - 0x20017 Having tried everything I do not know what to do ... Can you help me please ? Thank you  PS: I migrated my OS with the software "Paragon migrate OS to SSD" from my hard disk to my SSD. Maybe I have this errors because I did this.... Show that a norm on an inner product space satisfies parallelogram law. Hence use the parallelogram law to show that the space of continuous real functions defined on the interval $[a,b]$ is not a Hilbert space. Here I did the first part. Let $X$ be an inner product space and $x,y\in X$ consider $\Vert x+y\Vert ^2$ and $\Vert x-y\Vert ^2$ Then on adding I get $\Vert x+y\Vert ^2+\Vert x-y\Vert ^2=2(\Vert x\Vert ^2 +\Vert y\Vert ^2)$ For the second part I don’t know how can a parallelogram law prove $C[a,b]$ is not a Hilbert space, help me please. What if residuals are normally distributed, but y is not? Cannot find Underground Jungle Temple Find The Last 3 digits of the number $2003^{2002^{2001}}$ Find The Last 3 digits of the number $2003^{2002^{2001}}$  BY number theory or otherwise,   Also i would like to ask is there a property observed in the numbers of the form $k^n$, where for some $k, n$ is varied then the digits of $k^n$ are periodic,  for example,  $2^n$,  its last digit is periodic with period 4, its second last digit is periodic $4\cdot 5 = 20$ its third last digit is periodic with periodic with period $20\cdot 5 =100$  I have observed this property with other numbers as well, though period might vary,for different values of $k$. If $ar + bs =1$, then $\gcd(a,s) = \gcd(r,b) = \gcd(r,s) = 1$ Should an apostrophe be used with a z at the end of a word? I know that if a word ends with an s then it should be made plural or possessive by use of an apostrophe with no extra s (e.g. "Thomas Harris' book was a riveting read." as opposed to "Gary Barlow's voice is so distracting.")  What about if the word ends with a z. For example, would it be Gomez' album or Gomez's album? Are comments safely hidden once the document is compiled? There is a kind of situation that seems to occur somewhat commonly, that goes something like:   Figure out some way to handle a particular situation do it regularly, and make a habit of it, as it seems to work OK … … and only much later actually realize that it very much isn’t OK, that it’s been doing harm all the time, and that it’s too late to fix anything.   Does there exist any good words or phrases for this kind of situation? Weighting features prior to SVM This image from wikipedia, explains that there occurs a potential drop across a , and an electric field confined to the depletion region.  I already know the reason for the existence of this drop and the calculation of the difference but I have two questions regarding this drop.    1) If the  regions are externally connected using a perfectly conducting wire, why will not any current flow? Connecting the two regions should equalize their potentials (since wire is a resistance less) conductor, and therefore the gradient at the junction is destroyed resulting in a  which is obviously against conservation of energy as the semiconductor has non-zero resistivity. Where will extra potential drops will be created so that Kirchoff's voltage rule holds without any current and the built-in potential difference $V_o$ of the juction persists?    2) (probably naive) If an external Bias is applied, of say $|V|&lt;|V_o|$, then the pn potential difference across the junction will just reduce by that amount ($|V|$). Assuming that the external voltage source is ideal without any resistance, what will be the potential drops which would sum to zero in this case? Will drop due to the resistance of semiconductor play a par in it? If yes, then there cannot be any ideal resistance-less semiconductor junction, can there?