As we all know, we earn privileges by earning reputation. But this is what I want to change; I want it to be so you can vote up, chat, comment and asking on Meta when you have any amount of reputation even 1. This is for all SE sites.  I am including voting up, chatting, and comment in this is because people would like to know how many people like their Q&amp;A. They don't want be like nobody likes this Q Sometimes I 'm like that too. You don't have to make it so they earn reputation if the voter's reputation is below 15. Chatting is something everyone likes so people should be able to chat with less than the required amount. Sometimes people want to comment to understand the question more. I haven't been able to comment yet and I am struggling to answer question I should be able to answer. The last one I am really questioning myself on. People should be able to ask on Meta because a lot of people want to ask some question on how the site works. Of course they could come to Meta Stack Exchange but sometimes they might want to know something that is only on that one site.  The reason I want this feature-request is because on many of the sites I've joined you will see many places I only have 1 reputation.   Unlike  this is asking about reputation privileges activated at level one; not asking how I got 100 extra reputation on all communities.
Community FAQ For sites in the Stack Exchange 2.0 network To see a list of commonly used words and phrases, see the . For official guidance from Stack Exchange, visit the . Asking questions                            Answering questions                 Accepting answers        Working with posts  What does it mean when a question or answer is...  ?  ?  ?  ?                                       Comments             Etiquette                         Promotion         Editing and Formatting                                    Tagging                      Reputation, badges, and voting                                         Moderation                                                 Searching and RSS feeds        Accounts, registration and logging in                                     Other                                 ()                                 Site-specific entries Stack Overflow             Meta Stack Exchange       Other     External links           Is your question not part of the FAQ? First look at questions tagged  to see if there is a question not in this index that might have the answer you seek. If you still can't find an answer, then see the following instructions for proposing an FAQ question. How can a question be added to this FAQ?  Ask only the question, stated plainly and simply, in the question body. The answer goes in an answer.  Link back to this index. Paste this at the end of the question:  [Return to FAQ index](/q/7931)   Tag as  and .  When a post seems to have hit a mature state, it will have  added by a moderator.  Flag for a moderator to mark community wiki.  Any FAQ post not yet community wiki should be made into a community wiki.  After the post has the  tag added to it, add a link in the above .
AutoHotkey Equivalent for OS X? Is there an equivalent product/method for AutoHotkey. For those that don't know, its a product that allows you to program your mouse movements and keyboard. This allows me to "macro" certain functions on programs instead of having to do it manually. In the old days they used to call them keyboard stuffers. But that is only half of the solution as I need a "mouse movement" stuffer as well.  Is there such a beast? X, along with Y, "were" or "was"? I was interested in the following sentence which appeared in a   in The Washington Post, Politics, (WHO RUNS GOV).     She, along with Mark Childress, were set to be Daschle's deputies at   the White House before he stepped down.   Can someone clarify if the fragment "She, along with Mark Childress, were set to" is ungrammatical, as I think it is?  I would reword were with was because I think that the subject of the sentence - obviously, in grammatical terms - is "She", not "She" and "Mark Childress", but I'm not sure on this correction.  More precisely, I'm not so sure that "She, along with Mark Childress" is equivalent to She and Mark Childress with regard to the effects on the grammatical numbers. If $A|B$ and $B|A$ then prove $A=\pm B$ If $A|B$ and $B|A$ then prove $A=\pm B$   So far I have $A|B \iff AX=B$ and $B|A \iff BY=A$ with $X,Y \in \mathbb{Z}$  Not sure how to finish, any help. How to Make A button do more than one action xcode Show that $\left| \frac{1}{x}-\frac{1}{z} \right| \le \left|\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{y} \right| + \left|\frac{1}{y} - \frac{1}{z} \right|$. Make the enter key send message on iPad How to Backup and Restore Android OS without Rooting I want to find a way to restore my phone in case the process of rooting my phone or dual booting a custom rom breaks it. However, most of the ones I've looked at require the phone to be rooted before installing. I know I can create a nandroid backup through system settings, but I don't know how to recover that without rooting my device, or if there are better options. I'm not terribly concerned for any personal data on my phone (I can backup my pictures pretty easily), but I mostly just want to be able reinstall Android OS or reset to factory default in case my device breaks. Thanks! Edit: I am going to ask a new question (one different enough to justify not simply modifying this one) with the new info I learned from the possible duplicate. Navigation page buttons are orange everywhere On a similar note to this question:  (which only covers two examples only on the profile page, this question mentions more places on and outside the profile page where this bug occurs).  I've noticed that whenever there are these page buttons now, for example, the profile page, /questions and tag pages they are orange.  Per the other post I'm assuming this is a bug but if it was intentional then this is a feature request to make them theme-able per site again. Why do people rule out local hidden variables? I bet the automatic response to my question would be "Bell's theorem" and of course I am not disputing Bell's proof. I am however uncertain of one of his assumptions.  The so called "no conspiracy" assumption states that we somehow posses this magical thing called free will which makes us able to break free from the causal chain of events that make us measure the $y$-axis instead of the $x$-axis and so on in experiments. Obviously this makes little sense once reviewed under the light of logic. What this naturally implies is that, if a theory is fully deterministic, it is instantly super-deterministic.  Simon Kochen and John Conway published a theorem in 2009, , which simply-put states: either everything is deterministic (super-deterministic) or every particle has free will.  Among the few who accept this to the fullest extent is Gerard 't Hooft. He has proposed that what we call sub-atomic particles are really just templates and that there is a realm beneath the quantum where the true fabric of reality is "hidden". By accepting determinism he escapes Bell's theorem (due to not having to accept the "no conspiracy" assumption) and can construct a local, deterministic and realist hypothesis of reality. In Gerard 't Hooft's model there is cellular automata somewhere near the Planck scale which gives rise to the "emergent quantum mechanics".  This means that there exist no superpositions in objective reality, the cat is always either dead or alive, no collapse of wave functions, no branching universes, non-locality or retro-causality.  The big question for me is basically: Why do people have such a hard time accepting determinism? Some will object and say "oh but it's SUPER-determinism", but that makes no sense whatsoever, either everything is determined (determinism) or only somethings are (quasi-determinism). By accepting it we escape Bell's theorem. Bell himself was well aware of this and mentioned it a few times in interviews in the 80's.  I know some are concerned that if we accept complete determinism we can no longer do science because it's all a HUGE CONSPIRACY. Gerard 't Hooft has answered critics who bring up this here: , section 6.  Additionally, another author who has taken a deeper look into the worries of "conspiracies" in QM interpretations is Peter J. Lewis in his paper  (also ).  So to all of you who dismiss local hidden variables I ask: Why? How do I get an iball 3.5G modem working on Ubuntu? I purchased iball 3.5G  connect wireless modem 1 month before. I am trying to connect it with my laptop which is having ubuntu Operating System. After plug-in it to the ubuntu system it is not connecting with net.   This modem is plug and play but after plugging it nothing is displaying to the system.  I am expecting step-by-step method to connect this modem with my ubuntu 12.04 LTS sysetm from your expert's advice. At what port did Lorance Effler born about 1787 in Germany come to the US? Fetching all (javascript) global variables in a page A fly in an accelerating car A fly is flying around in a car, the fly never touches any surface in the car only fly’s around in the air inside the car. The car accelerates. does the fly slam in to the rear window. or does the fly continue to fly uninterrupted? How to stop Tkinter Frame from shrinking to fit its contents? This is the code that's giving me trouble.   f = Frame(root, width=1000, bg="blue") f.pack(fill=X, expand=True)  l = Label(f, text="hi", width=10, bg="red", fg="white") l.pack()   If I comment out the lines with the Label, the Frame displays with the right width.  However, adding the Label seems to shrink the Frame down to the Label's size.  Is there a way to prevent that from happening? Prove $\sum\limits_{i=0}^n\binom{i+k-1}{k-1}=\binom{n+k}{k}$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity) Let $n$ be a nonnegative integer, and $k$ a positive integer. Could someone explain to me why the identity $$ \sum_{i=0}^n\binom{i+k-1}{k-1}=\binom{n+k}{k} $$ holds? Does a List guarantee that items will be returned in the order they were added? Does a List&lt;T&gt; always guarantee that items will be returned in the order they were added when enumerated?  Updated: Thanks for all the answers folks, puts my mind at ease. I had a quick poke around the List&lt;T&gt; class with .NET Reflector (should've probably done that in the first place) and indeed the underlying store is an array of T (T[]). Skate shoes vs mtb shoes? It's an old argue on forums, still cant get it. What is the (real, that worth the money and time for ordering from abroad, in my case) difference, let's say between  shoes and some kind of old school skate shoes (the fat ones, like )?  P.S as far as I know most dirt BMXers are quite happy with regular skate shoes. Command/macro name cannot include numbers and symbols I would like put picture into table, and my idea is define new command as below>   \newcommand{\EJ471}{\includegraphics[scale=0.150]{EJ_471.jpg}}   But compiler reports an error. If I use the command name for example \EJa, everything is all right. I've read similar questions as      But still I don't understand why it does not work. Let $\{E_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of countable sets and let $S=E_1\times\cdots\times E_n\times\cdots $. Show $S$ is uncountable. Prove that the same statement holds if each $E_n=\{0,1\}$.  By the definition of Cartesian product of sets,   $$\displaystyle S=\Pi_{n\in\mathbb{N}} \{f\colon\mathbb{N}\rightarrow\cup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}E_n\mid\forall n, f(n)\in E_n\}$$  If $E_n=\{ 0,1\}$, then  $$\displaystyle S_{01}=\Pi_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\{0,1\}=E^{\mathbb{N}}$$, where $E=\{0,1\}$.  By a theorem, $\cup_{n\in\mathbb{N}} E_n$ is countable since the sequence is countable.  I'm not sure how to go on from here to show $S$ is uncountable. Can we say anything about the function $f$ that maps a countable $\mathbb{N}$ to another countable union of sequence of countable sets? SD Card showing weird file names and files are lost I just plugged my SD Card to my PC after a long videography day, and I suddenly got this problem:    It is also not showing all the videos I took on my camera so what is the solution?