I want to ask about the +1 ability of .  If the creature (that was the untapped land) dies from combat damage or any other effects, is the land removed from battlefield afterwards? Usually I´d say yes, but the card explicitly says It´s still a land.  If it is removed, then can I bring the land back with the -3 ability?  Thank you.
Some lands have an ability to become a creature, but they usually say they are still a land. If a land is a 3/3 creature and a land, can you target and kill it with a  to send it to the graveyard, or does it remain in play as a land?
Intraclass correlation coefficient vs. F-test (one-way ANOVA)? I'm a little confused regarding the intraclass correlation coefficient and one-way ANOVA.  As I understand it, both tell you how similar observations within a group are, relative to observations in other groups.  Could someone explain this a little better, and perhaps explain the situation(s) in which each method is more advantageous? Entire function with vanishing derivatives? Let $f:\mathbb{C}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$ be an entire function. And assume that at each point, one of it's derivatives vanishes.  What can you say about $f$?  A hint suggests that $f$ must be a polynomial. $A_n$ is the only subgroup of $S_n$ of index $2$. Flag pop-up hidden beneath answer box (and it's still transparent!) The flag window on (a comment to) the last question is hidden beneath the answer box, as shown in the following screenshot:    Linked: , which is currently  - this is not fixed for flags on comments! Is string in array? What would be the best way to look in a string[] to see if it contains a element. This was my first shot at it. But perhaps there is something that I am overlooking. The array size will be no larger than 200 elements.  bool isStringInArray(string[] strArray, string key) {     for (int i = 0; i &lt;= strArray.Length - 1; i++)         if (strArray[i] == key)             return true;     return false; } I have recently been reading a lot on this site (@Aniko, @Dikran Marsupial, @Erik) and elsewhere about the problem of overfitting occuring with cross validation - (Smialowski et al 2010 Bioinformatics, Hastie, Elements of statistical learning).  The suggestion is that any supervised feature selection (using correlation with class labels) performed outside of the model performance estimation using cross validation (or other model estimating method such as bootstrapping) may result in overfitting.   This seems unintuitive to me - surely if you select a feature set and then evaluate your model using only the selected features using cross validation, then you are getting an unbiased estimate of generalized model performance on those features (this assumes the sample under study are representive of the populatation)?  With this procedure one cannot of course claim an optimal feature set but can one report the performance of the selected feature set on unseen data as valid?  I accept that selecting features based on the entire data set may resuts in some data leakage between test and train sets. But if the feature set is static after initial selection, and no other tuning is being done, surely it is valid to report the cross-validated performance metrics?   In my case I have 56 features and 259 cases and so #cases > #features. The features are derived from sensor data.  Apologies if my question seems derivative but this seems an important point to clarify.  Edit: On implementing feature selection within cross validation on the data set detailed above (thanks to the answers below), I can confirm that selecting features prior to cross-validation in this data set introduced a significant bias. This bias/overfitting was greatest when doing so for a 3-class formulation, compared to as 2-class formulation.  I think the fact that I used stepwise regression for feature selection increased this overfitting; for comparison purposes, on a different but related data set I compared a sequential forward feature selection routine performed prior to cross-validation against results I had previously obtained with feature selection within CV. The results between both methods did not differ dramatically. This may mean that stepwise regression is more prone to overfitting than sequential FS or may be a quirk of this data set. I am not very well versed on set theory or syntax, but I thought I knew the basics.  However, in a book about databases I am reading now, the author uses $2^x$ to signify "a set of $x$."  For example, $2^{\text{dogs}}$ is a set of $\text {dogs}$, etc.    The author never really explained this or why he does it, I just picked up the meaning from context.    I am not sure why the exponent operator is used, nor am I sure what the number $2$ has to do with it.  The sets being represented are NOT powers of $2$ (in size)... they come in all sizes.  Is this a valid notation?  I have not seen it anywhere before... Why doesn't attempting to edit count as a pass for a review audit? I just got a question in the review queue that, though poor, I thought was potentially salvageable via editing.  However when I clicked the Edit button I got the deleted post error.  Since the post was gone, I clicked I'm Done (what is there do do with a deleted post?) only to get the review audit failed message instead.  The current behavior is also problematic in that, now that I know about it, it's a risk-free way to check if a question is an audit and not an actual review. That allows me or anyone else who knows about it to detect audits without having to recognize that the question is bad. Norms Induced by Inner Products and the Parallelogram Law I am trying to make a histogram with the fitted curve plotted on it. Here's the mwe:   \documentclass[a4paper]{scrartcl}     \usepackage{tikz}     \usepackage{pgfplots,pgfplotstable}     \usepackage{filecontents}     \pgfplotsset{compat=1.10}     \usepackage[active,tightpage]{preview}     \setlength\PreviewBorder{2pt}     \newcommand{\plots}{0.611201}     \newcommand{\plotm}{2.19882}     \begin{filecontents}{data.dat}     2 0.0629921259843     3 0.0236220472441     4 0.0314960629921     5 0.125984251969     6 0.0629921259843     7 0.102362204724     8 0.110236220472     9 0.0551181102362     10 0.0629921259843     11 0.0314960629921     12 0.0236220472441     13 0.0314960629921     14 0.0629921259843     15 0.0551181102362     16 0.0393700787402     17 0.0472440944882     18 0.00787401574803     19 0.0393700787402     24 0.00787401574803     27 0.00787401574803     33 0.00787401574803     \end{filecontents}     \begin{document}     \begin{preview}      \begin{tikzpicture}     \begin{axis}[     yticklabel style={/pgf/number format/fixed},     scaled y ticks = false,     minor y tick num={1},     xtick pos=left,     legend cell align = left,     legend style={draw=none},     xlabel = {group size},     ylabel = {ratio}     ]     \addplot[blue,ybar,fill, fill opacity=0.3, bar width = 0.8,] table {data.dat};     \addplot[red, line width = 1,domain=1:40,samples=100] {1/(x*sqrt(2*pi)*\plots)*exp(-(ln(x)-\plotm)^2/(2*\plots^2))};     \legend{empirical,lognormal fit}     \end{axis}     \end{tikzpicture}     \end{preview}     \end{document}     As you can see, the legend is not really good. How can I change the legend so it looks more like this? Is $\sqrt{64}$ considered $8$? or is it $8,-8$? Last year in Pre-Algebra we learned about square roots. I was taught then that $\sqrt{64}=8$ and $\sqrt{100}=10$, which I understood and accepted. I was also taught that $\pm\sqrt{64} = 8,-8$ because both of those numbers squared is 64, which I also get. But this year, with a new school and teacher in a different state, our teacher is telling us that: $\sqrt{64}=8,-8$ and $\pm\sqrt{64}$ also is $8,-8$. The way to get the positive root of something is: $+\sqrt{64}=8$ And these seem to contradict each other. I was always taught that a regular square root returned a positive number and only a positive number, but now my teacher is saying a regular square root gives two numbers, and considering the square root of a number $n$ is defined as $y^2=n$ I see where he is coming from. Upon researching this Wikipedia says:  For example, $4$ and $−4$ are square roots of $16$ because $4^{2} = (−4)^{2} = 16$  And Wolfram MathWorld says:  Note that any positive real number has two square roots, one positive and one negative. For example, the square roots of $9$ are $-3$ and $+3$  But on the other side, Wolfram Alpha, when given &quot;The square root of 9&quot; gives only 3.  So, which is right? Is $\sqrt{64}$ considered $8$? or is it $8,-8$? where do I use Database. Methods? I m trying to understand where we use following Database.Methods. I know if we want to insert a record to an object we use DML Statement. What i want to know is why/where we use Database. methods. It might be silly question. Database.saveResults Database.insert Database.query Database.Query Database.error   really appreciate the inputs. Thanks a ton in advance. Today my lecturer put up on the board that:  If $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}$ exists and $a_n&gt;0$ then   $\displaystyle \limsup\limits_{n\to\infty}\left(a_n^{\frac{1}{n}}\right)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}$  however I am not sure why this is true, can somebody give me a hint or something as to how to go about proving this.  thanks for any help Isometries of the sphere $\mathbb{S}^{n}$ If I have example.com, and blog.example.com, do search engines see those as one site or two? Will using subdomains hurt SEO? I have some technical reasons why I can't use example.com/blog. Circular References Cause Memory Leak? I'm trying to run down a memory leak in a windows forms application.  I'm looking now at a form which contains several embedded forms.  What worries me is that the child forms, in their constructor, take a reference to the parent form, and keep it in a private member field.  So it seems to me that come garbage-collection time:  Parent has a reference to the child form, via the controls collection (child form is embedded there).  Child form is not GC'd.  Child form has a reference to the parent form, via the private member field.  Parent form is not GC'd.   Is this an accurate understanding of how the garbage collector will evaluate the situation?  Any way to 'prove' it for testing purposes? Why is you subjective? (Catchy title, eh?)  I am asking the following on the photo.SE site:     How do you change from portrait to landscape in Lightroom   DANGER! DANGER! This appears to be subjective and is likely to be closed.  If I ask the following radically different question:     How do I change from portrait to landscape in Lightroom   ... there is no problem.  So, like the title says: Why is "you" subjective?  (And  where Jeff spills the regex) external variable in awk Scamming a scammer? I have seen many questions like:      My question is: what happens if you receive this money (without doing anything or giving your bank account number) but do not do anything scammer wants?  I especially want to know about what happens with the money you got and possible legal consequences.    Is it considered yours because scammer transfered it to you? Do you have to return it? If yes, to whom and in what form? And finally, how is it that scammers are just sending money to random people? Aren't they scared that someone will simply not return it? I understand that this may be stolen money, but it surely took some effort (cash/time) to "acquire" it, so why are they just sending it away? Proving $\prod \limits_{k=0}^{n}(1-a_k) \geq1- \sum\limits_{k=0}^{n}a_k$