I want to validate an input ( date of birth ) using jQuery Validation plugin, but it must be in format "dd/mm/yyyy" and also not validate when the date of year is over 2002.   So the date is valid when it's in this format "dd/mm/yyyy" and year over "2002"
How can I specify a custom date formate to be validated with the  for jQuery?
Controversy over verb choice in "neither you nor I {is/am/are} in control" I read this recently on the web and can't manage to understand it. Not homework -- I haven't done math homework for years.  If $d\mid ab$ then $d=d_1 d_2$, that $d_1|a$, that $d_2|b$ and, further, if $(a,b)=1$ then $(d_1,d_2)=1$.  I know it's the same question... if $a = a_1 a_2 ... a_n$, why can't $d$ divide some $a_i$ and only $a_i$? I get how a normal fork bomb works, but I don't really understand why the &amp; at the end of the common bash fork bomb is required and why these scripts behave differently:  :(){ (:) | (:) }; :   and   :(){ : | :&amp; }; :   The former causes a cpu usage spike before throwing me back to the login screen. The latter instead just causes my system to freeze up, forcing me to hard reboot. Why is that? Both continually create new processes, so why does the system behave differently?   Both of the scripts also behave differently from  :(){ : | : }; :   which doesn't cause any problems at all, even though I would have expected them to be alike. The bash manual page states that the commands in a pipeline are already executed in a subshell, so I'm led to believe that : | : should already suffice. I belive &amp; should just run the pipeline in a new subshell, but why does that change so much?  Edit: Using htop and limiting the amount of processes, I was able to see that the first variant creates an actual tree of processes, the second variant creates all the processes on the same level and the last variant doesn't seem to create any processes at all. This confuses me even more, but maybe it helps somehow? How to configure a firewall that only allows a few webpages and dropbox and U1 services? Adding Vertical Reference in Python to ArcGIS feature dataset View referrals from one part of my site to another in Google Analytics I have an online shop with a blog structured this way:   Shop: example.com Blog: example.com/blog   Both index have the same Google Analytic Code (UA). In the blog I write articles about some products with a link to the product page.  Now the problem is, I want to see stat on visits whose referral links have this pattern example.com/blog/*. Max dimension of a subspace of singular $n\times n$ matrices I am sure the answer to this is (kind of) well known. I've searched the web and the site for a proof and found nothing, and if this is a duplicate, I'm sorry.  The following question was given in a contest I took part. I had an approach but it didn't solve the problem.     Consider $V$ a linear subspace of the real vector space $\mathcal{M}_n(\Bbb{R})$ ($n\times n$ real entries matrices) such that $V$ contains only singular matrices (i.e matrices with determinant equal to $0$). What is the maximal dimension of $V$?   A quick guess would be $n^2-n$ since if we consider $W$ the set of $n\times n$ real matrices with last line equal to $0$ then this space has dimension $n^2-n$ and it is a linear space of singular matrices.  Now the only thing there is to prove is that if $V$ is a subspace of $\mathcal{M}_n(\Bbb{R})$ of dimension $k &gt; n^2-n$ then $V$ contains a non-singular matrix. The official proof was unsatisfactory for me, because it was a combinatorial one, and seemed to have few things in common with linear algebra. I was hoping for a pure linear algebra proof.  My approach was to search for a permutation matrix in $V$, but I used some 'false theorem' in between, which I am ashamed to post here. Plotting function defined with Lua doesn't do anything Offer a network-wide newsletter Is my model any good, based on the diagnostic metric ($R^2$/ AUC/ accuracy/ RMSE etc.) value? I've fitted my model and am trying to understand whether it's any good. I've calculated the recommended metrics to assess it ($R^2$/ AUC / accuracy / prediction error / etc) but do not know how to interpret them. In short, how do I tell if my model is any good based on the metric? Is an $R^2$ of 0.6 (for example) sufficient to let me proceed to draw inferences or base scientific/business decisions?     This question is intentionally broad, to cover a wide variety of situations that members frequently encounter; such questions could be closed as duplicates of this one. Edits to broaden the scope beyond the metrics mentioned here are welcome, as are additional answers - particularly those that offer insight about other classes of metrics. I read (or do I say "have read"?) many rules for when to use the present perfect. I found them complex and hard to understand (or do I say "have found"?). I am finding it hard to apply these rules in real sentences.  Is there a simple and clear way to explain the difference between past simple and present perfect? If there is a simple explanation, please tell it! If there is no simple explanation, please tell why it is so complicated. Maybe if I knew why there is no simple explanation, that would help me understand what work I need to do in order to learn the difference. Recently I've changed jobs, and consequently the field of research has also changed. But I'm still getting proposals for publications in the previous field, and it is interesting for me to accept some of them. My concern is about which affiliation to use: on one hand I gain all the knowledge in that field while working on the previous employer, also I hope they can cover my expenses related to the publication. On the other hand, I do not work for them anymore, and my current company has very little interest in my old field of research, and probably will not support it financially, but I think it is wise to mention them as well. As a compromise I'm thinking to put the previous employer in the affiliation, and the name of my new employer in the footnote, something like "currently at XYZ". Surely I'll discuss this issue with both, although the opinion of the community is also very valuable. Why catch Exceptions in Java, when you can catch Throwables? We recently had a problem with a Java server application where the application was throwing Errors which were not caught because Error is a separate subclass of Throwable and we were only catching Exceptions.  We solved the immediate problem by catching Throwables rather than Exceptions, but this got me thinking as to why you would ever want to catch Exceptions, rather than Throwables, because you would then miss the Errors.  So, why would you want to catch Exceptions, when you can catch Throwables? Get TEXT value of a CLOB OID in Postgresql A Particular Two-Variable System in a Group Suppose $a$ and $b$ are elements of a group $G$. If $a^{-1}b^{2}a=b^{3}$ and $b^{-1}a^{2}b=a^{3}$, prove $a=e=b$.   I've been trying to prove but still inconclusive. Please prove to me.  Thanks very much for proof. Let a,b,c,d be real or complex numbers with absolute value less than $1$. Is the following true:  $$|ab-cd| \leq |a-c| +|b-d|?$$ Given (p ∧ q), use the Fitch system to prove (q ∨ r) I'm having trouble solving a Fitch Style Proof and I was hoping someone would be able to help me.  Premises: p ∧ q  Goal: q ∨ r  Would be an assumption (p ∧ q => q ∨ r) in first step a correct one?   Then, q ∨ r Implication Elimination: 2, 1  Why is it not correct?  Thank you very much for any help! Why say "of x's" instead of "of x"? I have often heard people say "x of his" or "x of mine". But since his and mine point out ownership, isn't using "of" here doubles that ownership? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to say "x of him" or "x of them" etc.?  Example:     I was a good friend of your dad's. He told me all about you` Age and Graduate school I am 33. I live in the US. I am a neither a US citizen, nor a green card holder. I have worked in various jobs as a research assistant (physics, biology, economics) usually involving programming, mathematics or statistics.  As a newly minted undergraduate, I didn't really have much confidence in myself and I completely ruled out graduate school as pointless.  I didn't think of myself as smart enough.  I drifted into working in labs, because those are some of the easiest ones for which one can get a work permit in the US as a non-American.  Having worked in academia for a while now, I've had a chance to leap into various fields and help build solutions to complex problems.  I think I have literally gone as far as I can go researching in academia with no higher degree.  I work at one of the top universities in the world.  (If you looked at US News rankings or the Academic Ranking of World Universities, it's in the top 5.)  Lately, I've been thinking about applying for graduate school.  I do have a few papers in various fields.  I'm thinking of a PhD in either pure mathematics, applied mathematics, statistics or computer science.   I see two big minuses to applying to graduate school:   Most people applying are more than a decade younger than I am.  (Alas, more than a few gray hairs have made an appearance in recent years.) Perhaps my achievements would look good for someone younger, but partially my achievements are the result of a long career rather than any special brilliance. So, I wonder how my record will be perceived.  I did take GRE and I scored 800 quantitative, 800 verbal and a 5 on the essay.  (I would most likely have to do a GRE subject test depending on what field I ultimately decided.)   Please advise on how accomplished, but older candidates, are viewed in the graduate school application process. Is Kant's "noumenal self" argument on freedom flawed?