I am overlaying some WGS84 (EPSG:4326) coordinates over a few DEM rasters with EPSG:102710 (NAD_1983_STATEPLANE_NEW_HAMPSHIRE_FIPS_2800_FEET)  When they are these two different layer CRS the coordinates overlay perfectly where they are supposed to be, however, if I change the coordinates to have the same EPSG as the DEM rasters, then the coordinates are way off. What is the explanation for this?  The rasters were from this site: . "Digital Elevation Model - Quad 54" for example.   Unfortunately, I cannot provide the coordinates.
I put 4 different layers into my ArcMap document, but only one of them will show up on the map! I should be seeing the other 3 layers as well. When I do a Zoom to layer, I can see one layer, but I cannot figure out how to make the other 3 show up at once on top of each other.  Before I opened ArcMap, I used ArcCatalog where I right-clicked 3/4 of the shapefiles and  clicked Properties &rarr; Coordinate system &rarr; Import and then clicked on my Trees layer, which has the coordinate system I want the other 3 to have. But when I opened ArcMap the 4 layers did not overlap, nor could I move them above or below each other.
What are the effects of exceptions on performance in Java? Is gravity just electromagnetic attraction? Recently, I  was pondering over the thought that is most of the elementary particles have intrinsic magnetism, then can gravity be just a weaker form of electromagnetic attraction? But decided the idea was silly.    But I then googled it and found  article. Is this idea really compatible with other theories as the article mentions? Is there any chance of this proposition being true? How do I stop Windows 10 from updating my graphics driver? Everytime I try to sudo something at the terminal, I get a warning message:  alexandre@XPS-15Z $ sudo mount file.iso /mnt/ -o loop [sudo] password for alexandre:  no talloc stackframe at ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4864, leaking memory   It's just annoying to get that all the time. How do I solve that? I'm on Ubuntu 14.04 (upgraded from 13.10) Standard concise way to copy a file in Java? Every element of a group has order $2$. Why, intuitively, is it abelian? What are the most suitable filter holders for my Samyang 14mm autofocus prime lens? I've looked into the ones from Haida and Nisi which are both suitable, though they're quite pricey for me currently - does anybody know of any cheaper possible alternatives? I understand there's the 160mm specifically made for use with this lens, though obtaining filters for it is difficult and limited. I'm hoping for something which may be cheaper than both Haida and Nisi, and still suitable for the 14mm lens. Thanks! Can't Open files from a directory in python When I try to move, rename, or delete a file named ␀in Finder, I get this error message:     The operation can't be completed, because an unexpected error occured (error code -50).   With mv, rm or find -delete in Terminal   rm: /Library/␀: Invalid argument  mv: rename /Library/␀ to /tmp/␀: Invalid argument  find: -delete: unlink(/Library/␀): Invalid argument   Can I move or delete this file in Mac OS X or do I have to use another operating system?  I even tried creating a file with this name in /tmp and it has not gone away since 8 reboots. Splitting lines with points while maintaining other dissolved lines? I am on ArcGIS Desktop 10.2. I have a line feature class of a stream network. I also have a point feature class along the main stream (line) where a catchment enters that stream. I have dissolved my whole streams layer into one line feature and want to split this feature at the points.    However, when I use the  tool, the lines that don't have a point splitting them are still being split at the intersection of two streams.    Why did this line not stay as one feature with the other lines on that side of the splitting node and how can I prevent this from happening? Does the selection of sRGB or Adobe RGB in camera when shooting RAW ever matter? I shoot RAW essentially 100% of the time, and have the in-camera color space setting at AdobeRGB (sRGB is also offered). The raw converter in turn is set to produce sRGB output files. As I understand the process, the general flow is for raw shooting: raw sensor data readout (including A/D conversion), compression, write to a raw file, then in post-processing rather than in-camera apply color space/color temperature/etc; for JPEG shooting: raw sensor data readout, apply color space/color temperature/etc, JPEG compression, write to memory card (in camera).  Hence, when a colleague said that I should leave the camera set to sRGB for best/consistent results despite using the camera's raw format, it didn't really make much sense to me. I have mulled it over for a while now and it still doesn't really make any sense.   seems to support my view of the differences in the data recorded in RAW and JPEG modes, respectively.  I did find , but the answers there seem to focus more on the difference between AdobeRGB and sRGB. My question is, when shooting RAW, does it ever matter (except for the image preview) whether the camera is set to sRGB or AdobeRGB? If it does, then why, and in what situations? Is my understanding of the "raw" format processing chain flawed?  In case it matters, I have a Canon EOS 50D. I have a material assigned to a few test objects with an image sequence as a texture. If I view the scene in render preview, and scrub the timeline, (or render a sequence,) the texture behaves as expected.  However, with the viewport set to 'texture' or 'material' I only see the first frame of the sequence, wherever I am on the timeline. 'Auto Refresh' is set in the cycles texture node. Is this the expected behaviour? I want to include some Cyrillic with a TeX Gyre Pagella text and math font document. I'm using TeXLive 2019.  As indicated in , running pdflatex on the following source works just fine:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[T1,T2A]{fontenc} \usepackage[russian,main=english]{babel} \usepackage{paratype} \usepackage{tgpagella} \usepackage{substitutefont} \substitutefont{T2A}{\rmdefault}{PTSerif-TLF}  \usepackage{amsmath}  \usepackage[math]{blindtext}  \begin{document}  The topologist is {\Russian Алекс\'{а}ндров}.  \blindmathpaper  \end{document}   However, running xelatex on the following surce produces output from which the indicated Cyrillic just disappears:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[T2A,T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[russian,main=english]{babel} \usepackage{amsmath} % load here to avoid \dddot clash \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{paratype} \setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]{TeX Gyre Pagella} \usepackage{substitutefont}% \substitutefont{T2A}{\rmdefault}{PTSerif-TLF}%  \usepackage{unicode-math} \setmathfont{TeX Gyre Pagella Math}  \usepackage[math]{blindtext}  \begin{document}  The topologist is {\Russian Алекс\'{а}ндров}.  \blindmathpaper  \end{document}   Question: How should this second source be fixed so as to allow the Cyrillic to appear, too?  (I did put Map paratype-truetype.map into my local updmap.cfg file and did run updmap-user.) How to get the ASCII value of a character Just as background, I should say I am a mathematics grad student who is trying to learn some physics. I've been reading "The Theoretical Minimum" by Susskind and Hrabovsky and on page 134, they introduce  transformations. Here's the first example they use:  Consider a particle moving in the x,y plane under the influence of a potential, $V$, which depends only on the radius, with Lagrangian:   $L=\frac{m}{2}(\dot{x}^2+\dot{y}^2)-V(x^2+y^2)$  This is clearly invariant under rotations:  $x \rightarrow x\cos \theta + y\sin \theta$  $y \rightarrow -x\sin \theta + y\cos \theta$  All well and good. Now they say "consider what happens ... when the angle $\theta$ is replaced by an infinitesimal angle $\delta$." Already I could say "What the heck is $\delta$ really?", but I'm willing to play along with my intuition. Since $\delta$ is infinitesimal, we work to first order and say   $\cos \delta=1$ and $\sin \delta= \delta$.  Plugging this into our rotation formulas above, we obtain:  $x \rightarrow x+y\delta$  $y \rightarrow y-x\delta$  By differentiating, we see that:  $\dot{x} \rightarrow \dot{x}+\dot{y}\delta$  $\dot{y} \rightarrow \dot{y}-\dot{x}\delta$  Plugging these into the Lagrangian and ignoring terms higher than first order, we see that the Lagrangian is invariant under this transformation.  My main problem with all of this is that I don't understand what the physical nature of an infinitesimal transformation actually is. All I got from the above was that if you do this formal calculation by following rules like "only work to first order in $\delta$," then the Lagrangian is invariant. This is in contrast to the case where we have an actual transformation, like a rotation, where there is no question about what is going on physically.  I would also like to know how all of this relates to rigorous mathematics. In mathematics, I can't recall ever using infinitesimals in an argument or calculation, so it would be useful if there was some way of formulating the above in terms of limits/ derivatives/ differential forms (for example). I sense a connection to Lie Algebras, as the infinitesimal version of the rotation is $(I+A)$ where $I$ is the identity matrix and $A$ is an element of the Lie Algebra of $SO(2)$.   Here are some questions whose answers I believe may be useful to me (feel free to answer some or all):  -What is an infinitesimal quantity like $\delta$ to the physicist?   -Why do physicists argue using infinitesimals rather than "standard" calculus?  -What is the physical meaning of infinitesimal transformation? How does it relate to Lie Algebras?   -Is there a rigorous theoretical apparatus for justifying the computations shown above?  -What is meant by the Lagrangian being invariant under infinitesimal transformations?  If any of the questions seem too vague, please say so. Thanks in advance for your insights! How is "Can anyone tell me how can I solve this" wrong? future or present with when Help ID this plant, quite possibly a weed I found this plant near my South Indian home in , India. Most probably it could be some sort of weed. Anyhoo, is this plant of any medical or commercial value? Is it a remedy for something?   It has a white tap root with little veins off the main root It has a really small yellow flower It's leaves are similar to that of a clover, except for that it has three to five leaves        Merci d'avance!  (P.S. Forgive me if this is some very common plant that I should know about, I'm in 7th grade.) How to install Skype 4.3? Note: The legacy Skype for Linux application (v4.*) is now discontinued and was removed from Canonical’s partner repositories, so this question and its answers are obsolete. Please refer to  of our .  Skype 4.3 is just released with considerable improvements. As a regular Skype user I want to use the latest Skype on my Ubuntu 14.04, but there is no updates from Update Manager. Even in Skype website only Skype 4.3 is available only for Ubuntu 12.04. Is there anyway to use this latest Skype on Ubuntu 14.04 or how much we have to wait for the update? Short circuit or disconnect to bypass a compressor I have an Altec Lansing ATP3 2.1 audio system PCB which I reverse-engineered, and I would like to bypass the JFET compressor that's on it. Its active components are a JFET and four op-amps. I will connect the input to the output so it gets forwarded to the next stage.  My question is: should I disconnect the input and output from the compressor (in that case should I remove power supply as well, which would be very annoying), or can I leave it connected but short-circuited?  The block I want to short-circuit is the pink one on the left.    I realize the image is very small. The sound comes in on the right, in the green box. In the middle yellow box there's some trebble/volume/bass control. The small green box on its left merges the left and right channels to forward it to the subwoofer section, which is the complete left half of this diagram (except the red box on the left, which is just power). Signal then goes through a low-pass, a small equalizer and a compressor (the big purple box). It finally gets amplified in the brown power amp.