Good day/night. I wanted to post something at StackOverflow and it was very urgent. I made to use correct grammar (I'm speaking English natively) but I was not allowed to post my question because 'question body does not meet our quality standards'. I read what these 'quality standards' are and my question seems to be alright. But for some reason it is not. Can you tell me what is wrong with it? Here it is:     Good day/night. Today i found one old tablet of mine. I can not remeber the pattern and i can not remove it. Tried ADB but it didn't have USB debunging on (when doing 'adb devices' list was empty). Tried trough Google Device Manager and still did not succeed. It acts like this tablet never existed. When i look carefully i saw that the google profile picture is an old one of mine. I turned on wifi but i didn't sync it with my new one. Is there any way to unlock it?
While trying to ask a question, I got the error message     This question body does not meet our quality standards. Please make sure that it completely describes your problem - including what you have already tried - and is written using proper grammar.    Why am I getting this message? What can I do to get the system to accept my question? Can you be more specific? What are good resources on how to ask high-quality questions?      For more information, see  in the .
Some doubts about photons I've been looking around and I can't seem to find an automatic (i.e. buzz- or Twitter-like) way to follow users inside Stack Exchange. Why haven't the developers added such a feature? It could help beginner users follow other beginners with the same interests. We would be able to learn from each others' questions and pitfalls. Also, it would reduce double posting. Recently I commented on  question   and the text did got bold but the italic word didn't seem to get italic on Android Chrome(Latest Ver.), but when I saw from the PC browser, it rendered as it should...  I've attached a screenshot of my phone ... Why crontab scripts are not working? Style every four posts differently Does the verb "unvelcro" exist or what can we use instead? I know that the following word pairs exist:  button – unbutton tie – untie  Can we use an analogous process with the verb &quot;velcro&quot;? Exclude a view from master layout? Finding value of $S-T$ in $2$ binomial sum. If $\displaystyle S=\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^k\frac{1}{k+m+1}\binom{n}{k}$ and f $\displaystyle T=\sum^{m}_{k=0}(-1)^k\frac{1}{k+n+1}\binom{m}{k}$.Then $S-T$ is   Try:$$S=\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^k\int^{1}_{0}x^{k+n}\binom{n}{k}dx=\int^{1}_{0}x^n\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-x)^k\binom{n}{k}dx$$  Could some help me, thanks If $\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt\rightarrow \infty$ as $|x|\rightarrow \infty\;,$ Then every line $y=mx$ Intersect $ y^2+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2$ If $f$ is a continuous function with $\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt\rightarrow \infty$ as $|x|\rightarrow \infty\;,$ Then show that every line $y=mx$ Intersect the curve $\displaystyle y^2+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2$  $\bf{My\; Try::}$ Put $y=mx$ in $$\displaystyle y^2+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2\;,$$ We get $$\displaystyle m^2x^2+y^2+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2.$$ We can write it as $$\displaystyle 2\int_{0}^{x}2m^2tdt+\int_{0}^{x}f(t)dt=2$$ So $$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x}\left[2m^2t+f(t)\right]dt-2 =0$$ Now Let $$g(x) = \displaystyle \int_{0}^{x}\left[2m^2t+f(t)\right]dt-2.\;,$$ When $x\rightarrow \infty\;,$ Then $g(x)\rightarrow \infty.$ (Where $g(x)$ is an Continuous function.) Now I did not Understand How can i solve that, Help me Thanks Is there a missing definite article before caliph in 'the group's leader, XYZ, as (the) caliph'? In the Wikipedia article , it says     After Newtonian gravitation was found to be inconsistent with special relativity, . . .   I don't see how Newtonian gravitation itself is inconsistent with special relativity.  After all, Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation is completley analogous to Coulomb's Law, so it would seem that, if there were an analogous "gravitational magnetic field", one could formulate a theory of gravitation in exact analogy with Maxwell's Theory of Electromagnetism, and of course, this would automatically be consistent with Special Relativity.  What about this approach to gravitation does not work?  The only problem I could see with this is the lack of evidence for a "gravitational magnetic field".  That being said, gravity is "weak" as it is, and my guess is that it would be extremely difficult to set up an experiment in which a massive body were moving fast enough for this "magnetic field effect" to be obsevable.  EDIT:  As has been pointed out to me in the answers, Newton itself is inconsistent with SR.  Similarly, however, so is Coulomb's Law, yet, electromagnetism is still consistent with SR.  Thus, how do we know that it is not the case that Newton's Law is the special "static" case of a more general gravitomagnetic theory exactly analogous to Maxwell's Theory:  Let $\mathbf{G}$ be the gravitation field, let $\rho$ be the mass density, and $\mathbf{J}$ be the mass current density, let $\gamma _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{4\pi \gamma _0}=G$, the Universal Gravitation Constant, let $\nu _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{\gamma _0\nu _0}}=c$, and suppose there exists a field $\mathbf{M}$, the gravitomagnetic field, so that the following equations hold: $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\rho}{\gamma _0} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{M}=0 $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{M}=\nu _0\mathbf{J}+\gamma _0\nu _0\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t} $$ where theses fields would produce on a mass $m$ moving with velocity $\mathbf{v}$ in our inertial frame the Lorentz force $\mathbf{F}=m\left( \mathbf{G}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{M}\right)$.  This theory would automatically be consistent with SR and would reduce to Newton's Law of Gravitation for the case of gravitostatics:  $\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t}=\mathbf{J}=0$.  (To be clear, you can't just set the time derivatives equal to $\mathbf{0}$ as it seems I have done.  Upon doing so, you obtain the corresponding static theory, which is technically incorrect (as you can easily see because it won't be relativistically invariant), but is nevertheless often a useful approximation.)  My question can thus be phrased as:  without appealing directly to GR, what is wrong with this theory? How to find the kth largest element in an unsorted array of length n in O(n)? I believe there's a way to find the kth largest element in an unsorted array of length n in O(n).  Or perhaps it's "expected" O(n) or something.  How can we do this? Number agreement between subject and object Order discrete x scale by frequency/value How do I remove objects from an array in Java? old Designjet 430 with Windows 10 iPhone: Detecting user inactivity/idle time since last screen touch Are tile bonuses counted twice if 2 new words are formed? An example:    O  O?   There is a triple letter tile to the right of the bottom O, indicated with a ?.  If I place an X on it, making the words OX (vertical) and OX (horizontal), do I score 50 points (scoring the tile twice) or 34 (scoring it once)? When calling super() in a derived class, can I pass in self.__class__? We currently have around 20 apex classes and 5 triggers which are not used in our production org. We want to delete them in our production instance. We dont have ant scripts ready yet to be used for our deployments and so we cannot use destructivechanges file. Currently our production deployments are done by our support team and they need documentation from us to do these deletes. Changesets do not allow to delete apex classes and triggers. So what is the best way to delete these apex classes and triggers from production?