I have probably a very simple question.  I have installed Windows 10 on my new computer and would like to Dual-boot. My setup is SSD + HDD where Windows is on SSD. I would like to split SSD and install Ubuntu on SSD too. The question is that, do I also need to split the second drive for Windows and Ubuntu or can I somehow keep it unbiased and acces the full memory from both?   Thanks for any answer.
I'm getting a PC with Windows and I want to dual boot using Ubuntu as my primary OS.  I want to create a Home partition to store all my files and hopefully be able to access them on Windows 7 without having to manually mount the partition or anything.  I want to know what kind of partition should I create and if I can share my Home partition to simplify matters.  Thanks
Night's Watch deserters are sentenced to death, as we've seen in the very first episode of Game of Thrones. A man dressed all in black is apprehended by Stark men and brought before Lord Eddard Stark. Lord Stark sees him as a deserter and sentences him to die (and then executes that death penalty).  However, there are men of the Night's Watch south of the Wall, on a legitimate mission or on some kind of allowed leave. For instance, we have Benjen Stark visiting Winterfell when the king and his party is there. There is also Yoren, who travels around Westeros in search of new recruits.  I could imagine that the Warden of the North (and other lords in the northern part of Westeros) would have a good idea of who would be allowed further south and whose appearance would raise suspicion. But I reckon the southern lords don't have as many visits from the Night's Watch, so they might not know who would be allowed to be there and who wouldn't.  How would lords who are rather unfamiliar with the specific brothers of the Night's Watch discern deserters from brothers sent out for some reason?  That ends my question, but there is a spoiler from the season 5 finale that continues the question a bit more:      Sam is sent to Oldtown to become a Maester, so he can replace Maester Aemon at Castle Black.  But he is riding together with Gilly (a woman!) and her baby (a baby!), which might raise a lot of suspicion from people who don't know what he is sent out to do.  What prevents southern lords of sentencing Sam as a deserter from the Night's Watch? How to find lines matching a pattern and delete them? In a file with lots of lines I want to delete lines that starts with HERE IT IS.  How can I do this using only command-line tools? Pretty much the problem asks if a function is continuous at the point $c$ and $f(c) &gt; 0$ then there exists a $d &gt; 0$ such that $\forall x$, $f(x) &gt; 0$ with $|x-c| &lt; d$.   I can understand what the problem means. That if a function is positive at a point then there is another point that's really close that'll also be positive. I can not prove this in a formal way though. I've tried using the intermediate value theorem and I do not know hot to implement it. Any ideas? Shiny locked Legendaries in ORAS Transpose of inverse vs inverse of transpose Goal: I want to be able to securely use the internet via my home PC while my notebook is connected to an open hotspot/access point.  I do know that I can use a SSH tunnel/SOCKS proxy, but I don't want to fiddle around with applications (making them use it, if even possible). I guess what I need is an OpenVPN setup, so I'm looking for a detailed guide on how to:   Install and setup the OpenVPN server Setup the OpenVPN client (NetworkManager)   Ubuntu versions this should work on are 10.10 and 11.04. How should I cite a website URL? Without appealing to the axiom of choice, it can be shown that (Proposition:) if $X$ is well-orderable, then $2^X$ is totally-orderable.  Question: can we show the stronger result that if $X$ is well-orderable, then so too is $2^X$?  Proof of Proposition. Pick any well-ordering of $X$. Then the lexicographic order totally orders $2^X$.  More explicitly: for any two $f,g \in 2^X$, define $f &lt; g$ iff   there exists $x \in X$ such that $f(x) \neq g(x)$, and if $x \in X$ is minimal such that $f(x) \neq g(x)$, then $f(x)=0$ and $g(x)=1$.   It can be shown that $&lt;$ totally-orders $2^X$. Can I configure it to allow:   select right-click to copy right-click or ctrl-v to paste? Let $a$, $b$, and $c$ be integers, where a $\ne$ 0. Then $$ $$ (i) if $a$ | $b$ and $a$ | $c$, then $a$ | ($b+c$) $$ $$ (ii) if $a$ | $b$ then $a$|$bc$ for all integers $c$; $$ $$ (iii) if $a$ |$b$ and $b$|$c$, then $a$|$c$.  Prove that if $a$|$b$ and $b$|$c$ then $a$|$c$ using a column proof that has steps in the first column and the reason for the step in the second column.  My book is really vague. I'm not really sure what to do..  First I was thinking something like this: $a\mid b\Rightarrow b=as$ and  $b\mid c\Rightarrow c=bt$ and $a\mid c\Rightarrow c = au$ $$ $$ $b + c + c = b + 2c$  $$ $$ $=as + 2(bt+au)$  Yea then I just got lost. Using custom tables in nft I have a Fedora 31 system on which I am using iptables-nft. I need this because there is still a bunch of software that expects the legacy iptables command line tools.  This means that my nftables configuration has the corresponding set of tables to match the legacy configuration:  table ip filter table ip nat table ip6 filter table ip mangle table ip6 nat table ip6 mangle   I use a containerized VPN service that, prior to nftables, would enable masquerading on my primary ethernet interface by running something like this when the vpn comes up:  iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.16.254.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE   Since upgrading to Fedora 31 and iptables-nft, this no longer works. The container (running alpine) does not have the iptables-nft compatability wrapper, but it does have the nft command itself.  I can't use the nft cli to add rules to the existing tables, because this will break iptables-nft. But I can create new tables. I was hoping I could just apply a configuration like this:  table ip vpn {     chain postrouting {         type nat hook postrouting priority filter; policy accept;         ip saddr 172.16.254.0/24 oifname "eth0" counter masquerade     }      chain forward {         type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept;         ip saddr 172.16.254.0/24 counter accept     } }   ...but this doesn't appear to have any impact. By setting the chains in this table to priority 0 I was hoping they would match before the legacy nat table, but that doesn't appear to be the case.  Is there a way to make this work? User group (company) page that shows summary of all user accounts belonging to the same company/user group Thor: Ragnarok ends with the remaining people of Asgard aboard a refugee ship that meets Thanos' ship. Avengers: Infinity War opens with      Thanos and his minions having commandeered the ship and several bodies can be seen on the floor.   This begs the question, what happened to these characters:   Korg Miek Asguardian extra #3 Valkyrie register_nav_menus() won't register menus Please help with menu registeration:  I have followed this guide (http://codex.wordpress.org/Navigation_Menus) step by step.  Added the following code to functions.php:  function register_my_menus() {   register_nav_menus(     array('header-menu' =&gt; __( 'Header Menu' ) )   ); }  add_action( 'init', 'register_my_menus' );   But the guide says that this will make the menu appear in the Appearance -> Menus admin screen in the "Theme Locations" box as "Header Menu".  When I go to Appearance -> Menus everything is greyed out and there is no option of "Theme Locations" What is the Necessity of $...$ Around Numbers? I typed up an assignment with a lot of numbers in LaTeX and turned it in to my adviser.  When he returned it to me with some corrections, one of which was a lot of $ around my numbers.  I understand that $ are necessary around some mathematical formulas, but I was just using numbers like -2 and 4.  I did not see any change in the font of the numbers when I added the $ either.  Since my adviser did not want to give me an explanation, what is the rationale? on the premise that it "wasn't getting any attention" and now it has gotten a bunch of helpful answers which all help me in some ways making it impossible for me to decide which one to award the bounty to.  Shouldn't there be an option to award the bounty equally among selected answerers, especially in this case where was getting no answers whatsoever before the bounty, or am I overthinking it and should award it to the first answer? Why does this formulation of Choice not follow from the Comprehension Schema? I  to the question "" which was specific to the question asked.  Another user engaged positively with my answer, as there was a small conversation thread.  That person then  and made what I would say are minor modifications (the comments I left in my original code that pertained to the specific case are still in the places where he made edits to be more specific).  The answer does acknowledge that it is a general case of my specific code.  Ignoring the fact that I'm involved in it, what should one do when seeing this situation?  The only thing I can think of, and I'm not sure that it's necessarily the right solution, is to flag the answer for moderator attention.  Other possible actions, which I believe are wrong, are:   Editing the answer; that would change its intent Voting the answer down; it's a technically correct answer   One could leave a comment, but that can lead to confrontation and escalation (depending on the parties involved) which would be counterproductive.  The only thing I've done, which is not really related, is edit the answer to hyperlink the already existing attribution (but I do this as a regular edit for any answer which explicitly references another).  What's the best approach here, if any? I have been/am being taught that end punctuation should always go inside quotes. For example, you are supposed to write:     Marvin thought it was "awful."   The problem is I do not see how does this make sense. Intuitively, I always wrote:     Marvin thought it was "awful".   as that makes more logical sense — you want a quote to be an exact replication of what somebody else said, so why should you add punctuation inside?  I always thought it made more sense to not touch the quote and add anything after or before if it must be added.  So, why should I put end punctuation inside quotes? Show that $d(z,a)=|\frac{z-a}{1-\overline{a}z}|$ is a metric on the unit disk For any $z, a$ in the open unit disk, we define$$d(z,a)=\left \vert \frac{z-a}{1-\overline{a}z} \right \vert$$  Show that $d$ is a metric on the open unit disk.     It is easy to show $d(z,a)=d(a,z)$ and $d(z,a)=0$ $\rm iff$ $z=a$. However, I am having trouble showing that it satisfies triangle inequality. Any help would be appreciated!