Image positioning in new page If i use the following code, my image is placed in the center of the page, horizontal as vertical. I think this happens, because the section above ended on the page before. I want it to go to the top of the page and then continue with text in a new page. If i would insert new text above the image, it should move down only as much as necessary.  \begin{figure}[h] \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=15cm]{images/g550}\caption{G550 \cite{bild_g550}} \end{center} \end{figure} \clearpage{}   I'm using the scrrprt class.
How to influence the position of float environments like figure and table in LaTeX? How to influence the position of float environments like figure and table in LaTeX?   This is a general question and should collect useful answers for all users. I hope we can use this as a reference
Missing vertices in Edit Mode I have append a mesh (rex) from this .blend .  In edit Mode I see different vertices from objcet mode (see pictures). The vertices of belt are missing!  OBJECT MODE:   EDIT MODE:   How can I edit vertices of belt? Is It a bug?  This is my .blend  maybe can help. Are Destiny characters backwards and/or cross-compatible? From what I heard and remember hearing correctly, characters that are leveled up through the PS3 can be transferred to the PS4 version (assuming that both consoles have the game).  So what if I wanted to go back to the PS3 version with some friends? I only have the PS4 version at the moment--would my PS4 characters transfer over to the PS3 side? What if I wanted to go to the 360 version too to play with some other people too? $X$,$Y$,$Z$ mutually independent implies $X+Y$ independent of $Z$ $\lim_{x\to0^{+}} x \ln x$ without l'Hopital's rule I have a midterm coming up and on the past exams the hard question(s) usually involve some form of $\lim_{x\to0^{+}} x \ln x$. However, we're not allowed to use l'Hopital's rule, on this year's exam anyways.  So how can I evaluate said limit without l'Hopital's rule? I got somewhere with another approach, don't know if it's useful:   $\lim_{x\to0^{+}} x \ln x = \lim_{x\to0^{+}} x^2 \ln (x^2) = L$ $= (\lim_{x\to0^{+}} 2x)(\lim_{x\to0^{+}} x \ln x)$ $= 0 * L$   Then I just need to prove that L is finite/exists (which means it must be 0) What is the motivation for including the compactness and semi-simplicity assumptions on the groups that one gauges to obtain Yang-Mills theories?  I'd think that these hypotheses lead to physically "nice" theories in some way, but I've never, even from a computational perspective. really given these assumptions much thought. What are some typical LuaTeX gotchas? What would be the easiest way to UV map a complex object? I'm attempting to make a texture for a model i've been working on, so i've been trying to get a decent UV map, However whenever I do it usually ends up either very distorted or a lot of unrecognizable pieces or several different UV maps. What are some easier ways of unwrapping/UV Mapping? Is there a way to increase space between bibliography without using biblatex? I get these weird characters when I try to print out a vector element! delayed addclass/remove class function not working A random variable with neither probability density function nor probability mass function... is this example wrong? This is from Shreve's Stochastic Calculus for Finance II, Appendix A.3. Consider infinitely many independent coin tosses with outcomes $\omega_n$, $n = 1, 2, \dots$ such that $\omega_n$ can be either $H$ = heads or $T$ = tails. Define \begin{equation} Y_n\left(\omega\right) = \begin{cases}1 &amp; \text{ if }\omega_n = H \\ 0&amp; \text{ if } \omega_n = T\text{.} \end{cases} \end{equation}  Define $\displaystyle Y = \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\dfrac{2Y_n}{3^{n}}$. Shreve shows that $Y$ can only take values in the Cantor set, and since that particular set has measure zero, its Lebesgue measure is zero as well, thus it does not have a probability density function (since integrating such a density function would give a value of $0$). This part I understand, as well as my professor.  Now Shreve claims that $Y$ does not have a probability mass function.      If it did, then for some number $x \in C$ [the Cantor set] we would have $\mathbb{P}\left(Y=x\right) &gt; 0$. But $x$ has a unique base-three expansion    \begin{equation} x = \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\dfrac{x_n}{3^{n}}\text{,} \end{equation}   where each $x_n$ is either 0, 1, or 2 unless $x$ is of the form $\dfrac{k}{3^{n}}$ for some positive integers $k$ and $n$. In the latter case, $x$ has two base-three expansions... In either case, there at most two choices of $w \in \Omega_{\infty}$ [that is, the infinite coin-toss space] for which $Y(\omega) = x$. In other words, the set $\{\omega \in \Omega; Y(\omega) = x\}$ has either one or two elements. The probability of a set with one element is zero, and the probability of a set with two elements is $0 + 0 = 0$. Hence $\mathbb{P}\left\{Y = x\right\} = 0$.   My professor and I were able to follow this until the statement "The probability of a set with one element is zero." Is this a true statement? How so?   I thought it would be perhaps the fact that the Lebesgue measure of $[a, a] = \{a\}$ is zero, but I don't see any reason why Shreve would only use the Lebesgue measure, since it is not a general probability measure. Is Canon 60D still a decent camera? I have a Canon 60D, bought it back in 2013. Use it quite a while, but in past two-three years, I lost interest in photography. I will be going on a long trip this summer and would like to take a decent camera with me. Is Canon 60D still a decent one or I will be missing on features and upgrades comparing to the latest versions?  In terms of lenses I own Tamron 24-70 2.8 And Canon 100 2.8 Macro. I have seen both usages.    Stay tuned on our Facebook page to know more  Stay tuned to our Facebook page to know more    But don’t know which one is more appropriate. Please help me figure it out. Thanks whether it be vs whether it is I brought the sentences from the speech about conversation tips.     They don’t just want to know about news and the weather.   They want to know about you.   So what are three things that you have going on right now, that you can talk about.   Whether it be school, whether it be a personal relationship, whether it be a hobby that you’re involved with.   My questions:     What is the difference in nuance between 'whether it is' and 'whether it be'?   Before posting this question, I googled, and some websites say 'whether it be' is subjunctive. I don't get why it is called 'subjunctive'. Because from what I know about subjunctive, it's supposed to be past of be verb.    If I say 'whether it should be' or whether it would be', is the meaning same? Does anyone know of a script that can select all text references to URLs and automatically replace them with anchor tags pointing to those locations?  For example:  http://www.google.com   would automatically turn into  &lt;a href="http://www.google.com"&gt;http://www.google.com&lt;/a&gt;   Note: I am wanting this because I don't want to go through all my content and wrap them with anchor tags. How to exit early on pipe close? I use golang for writing programs that are too complex to express as bash functions. The programs read stdin line by line and write modified output to stdout.  The problem with this iterating over all the lines in stdin approach, is that it doesn't exit early. For example, the following command will process all the lines instead of just 10:  cat largefile | custom-program | head -n 10   How do the native unix application manage to exit early and how can I do the same in my custom scripts? Cardioid in coffee mug? Possible Duplicate:          I would like to know if when I'm writing about a "user" (in the broad sense), what do I use? Example: "from the user’s perspective, saving a file is very easy; ? only needs..."  What is correct: she, he, she or he, or they. Do Mandalorians truly never remove their helmets? In episode 3 of The Mandalorian, it is said that Mandalorians never remove their helmets for any reason. Really? Not even to sleep or bathe? Is there any canonical source for this idea? I’m going to assume that the “never” implies “Never removes their helmets in public…” right?  But in flashback scenes to the Mandalorian’s childhood, nobody is really pictured wearing Mandalorian armor let alone helmets. They simply seemed like basic humans who might just be unified by wearing maroon wardrobes all the time.  So what is the deal with this claim? What is the canonical context of the claim?      Looking for in-universe, canonical explanations; not armchair speculation and theories. If none (currently) exist, legends explanation would suffice. Regardless, please provide references and context. Regression in spacing before lstlisting environment with version 2018/09/02 after paragraph break