Windows update causing system high CPU on Windows 10 Over the last few days I have been having issues with my machine running very slow. The problem seemed to be with the System process consuming about 20% CPU (more specifically ntoskrnl.exe!MmProbeAndLockPages).  Many attempts to reset and/or reinstall where unsuccessful. The only options that eventually worked was to reinstall windows (fresh) with the Network cable unplugged. This prevented Windows updates during the installation.  Now, I'm quite certain it's one of the device driver updates that's causing this issue. I have Windows Updates disabled for now but I would like to turn it back on but run the updates in stages.  Is there a way to selectively approve updates one by one? I am running Windows 10 Pro on a home network (if it makes a difference).  Thanks!   EDIT: I think I have managed to find the problem. I've enabled Windows Update again and it went through the same process of updating drivers. Checking the list of drivers I went to the Lenovo support website (M93p in my case) and started downloading alternative drivers and install them one by one. The Intel Gfx Driver fixed the problem and now the computer is responsive again. The high CPU from the System process may have been unrelated.
Troubleshoot High CPU usage by the "System" process I have noticed that from some time my system is freezing and its probably caused by the high CPU usage which is caused by the system process.  All applications I'm running is the Skype, TeamSpeak and Chrome so it definitely shouldnt eat that amount of CPU.  You can see the problem itself and running processes in the screenshot below:    Sometimes CPU usage is reaching 90%, but the average usage is like 40-65%.  My PC parameters:   Windows 8 (customer preview) Intel Core i3 - 2350M 8 GB RAM   I'd appreciate any help attempt! Regards.  --UPDATE--  As the user below posted a great answer, I have noticed that the process that is eating the most CPU in the system is called Arthurx.sys, simple google tells that it's a TPLink driver (an wifi adapter, I have bought like 2 weeks ago!) drivers has been installed from the Windows MSDN, but also tried to install the drivers from the attached CD, but it doesn't help. From the system start, it is using like 5% of the CPU only, but after 2-4 hours of working it is growing up and reaching 40-60% of the CPU usage.  Device name: TPLink WN722N
What does "can only heal so much" mean in this sentence? I found the following sentence in an American novel (this one:  you can read the whole paragraph). A woman broke her wrist and just had her cast removed. She thinks she can start playing piano again, but her wrist still hurts too much. I'm not sure I understand the meaning of the final sentence:  But a body can only heal so much, so fast.  Can someone help me, please? Given a group $ G $, how many topological/Lie group structures does $ G $ have? Can I SSH into a specific directory? Negative energy levels in the diagram for a hydrogen atom The higher the number of the shell (n), the higher is the energy level of the electron. However, why was it necessary to have negative values. So for example, when $n=1$, the energy could be $5 eV$ and for $n=2$, $6 eV$... having positive values could also have supported the idea that as $n$ increases, energy of electron increases. What is the point of having negative numbers, does it somehow aid calculations? Concatenating string with space What is $\arctan(x) + \arctan(y)$ I know $$g(x) = \arctan(x)+\arctan(y) = \arctan\left(\frac{x+y}{1-xy}\right)$$  which follows from the formula for $\tan(x+y)$. But my question is that my book defines it to be domain specific, by which I mean, has different definitions for different domains:  $$g(x) = \begin{cases}\arctan\left(\dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}\right), &amp;xy &lt; 1 \\[1.5ex]  \pi + \arctan\left(\dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}\right), &amp;x&gt;0,\; y&gt;0,\; xy&gt;1 \\[1.5ex]  -\pi + \arctan\left(\dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}\right), &amp;x&lt;0,\; y&lt;0,\; xy &gt; 1\end{cases}$$  Furthermore, When I plot the function $2\arctan(x)$, it turns out that the book definition is correct. I don't understand how such peculier definition emerges. Thank you. Move every file that is not a directory So I just got this Nikon D3100 Camera.  And I am trying to take a picture using autofocus with the kit lens(18-55mm).    The system is in Auto mode, AF-A, single frame and the lens A-M switch is on "A",  VR is "ON".  When I press shutter half way down, focus confirmation light in lower left corner of viewfinder neither lit nor blinks(hear clicking). When I press the shutter all the way down, the shutter seems locked (hear clicking, but shutter not released).    The manual says the shutter will lock itself if it can't get focus. But the place is well lit and have distinct color and I can easily focus using my old Canon.    The camera works fine in manual focusing, but I can't get it to take picture under auto-focusing.  I wonder is there something wrong with the setting that I don't know or is that I got a lemon?  Thanks Evaluating logistic regression and interpretation of Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit As we all know, there are 2 methods to evaluate the logistic regression model and they are testing very different things  Predictive power: Get a statistic that measures how well you can predict the dependent variable based on the independent variables. The well-known Pseudo R^2 are McFadden (1974) and Cox and Snell (1989).  Goodness-of-fit statistics The test is telling whether you could do even better by making the model more complicated, which is actually testing whether there are any non-linearities or interactions that you have missed.   I implemented both tests on my model, which added quadratic and interaction already:     &gt;summary(spec_q2)      Call:     glm(formula = result ~ Top + Right + Left + Bottom + I(Top^2) +       I(Left^2) + I(Bottom^2) + Top:Right + Top:Bottom + Right:Left,       family = binomial())       Coefficients:                  Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(&gt;|z|)         (Intercept)  0.955431   8.838584   0.108   0.9139         Top          0.311891   0.189793   1.643   0.1003         Right       -1.015460   0.502736  -2.020   0.0434 *       Left        -0.962143   0.431534  -2.230   0.0258 *       Bottom       0.198631   0.157242   1.263   0.2065         I(Top^2)    -0.003213   0.002114  -1.520   0.1285         I(Left^2)   -0.054258   0.008768  -6.188 6.09e-10 ***     I(Bottom^2)  0.003725   0.001782   2.091   0.0366 *       Top:Right    0.012290   0.007540   1.630   0.1031         Top:Bottom   0.004536   0.002880   1.575   0.1153         Right:Left  -0.044283   0.015983  -2.771   0.0056 **      ---     Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1     (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)     Null deviance: 3350.3  on 2799  degrees of freedom     Residual deviance: 1984.6  on 2789  degrees of freedom     AIC: 2006.6  and the predicted power is as below, the MaFadden is 0.4004, and the value between 0.2~0.4 should be taken to present very good fit of the model(Louviere et al (2000), Domenich and McFadden (1975))                                                :  &gt; PseudoR2(spec_q2)     McFadden     Adj.McFadden        Cox.Snell       Nagelkerke McKelvey.Zavoina           Effron            Count        Adj.Count     0.4076315        0.4004680        0.3859918        0.5531859        0.6144487        0.4616466        0.8489286        0.4712500           AIC    Corrected.AIC  2006.6179010     2006.7125925   and the goodness-of-fit statistics:  &gt; hoslem.test(result,phat,g=8)       Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit (GOF) test    data:  result, phat   X-squared = 2800, df = 6, p-value &lt; 2.2e-16  As my understanding, GOF is actually testing the following null and alternative hypothesis:   H0: The models does not need interaction and non-linearity   H1: The models needs interaction and non-linearity  Since my models added interaction, non-linearity already and the p-value shows H0 should be rejected, so I came to the conclusion that my model needs interaction, non-linearity indeed. Hope my interpretation is correct and thanks for any advise in advance, thanks. What determines whether colors you can't see are visible or not? So, when someone is red-green colorblind, the colors appear the same to them, like this:   And if you're totally colorblind, then things presumably just appear like they would in a black-and-white movie.  However, this isn't how ultraviolet patterns seem to work. Compare how we see this flower to the version where ultraviolet is visible:   The UV pattern is completely invisible here. However, unlike with the red and green, this isn't because yellow and UV are colors that appear identical when you can't see UV. Look at these flowers:     This time the flowers are purple, but the UV pattern is still invisible. Why is that? Shouldn't the UV pattern still be apparent on at least one of the flowers, just in a different color? And on some other flowers, the UV does appear as a different color. So:    Why is the UV invisible only sometimes?  Does it have to do with the flower using iridescent structures to produce color, instead of a pigment? Can this happen with red and green, as well? How to get rid of notch at pgfplots axes intersection? Pretty-print a Map in Java Is there an easy way to delete an element from an array using PHP, such that foreach ($array) no longer includes that element?  I thought that setting it to null would do it, but apparently it does not work. Limit points of the set $\{\frac {\varphi(n) }n : n\in \mathbb{N}\}$ Show an Ideal is the principal ideal for some polynomial. Let $F$ be a ﬁeld and $R = F[X]$. Suppose $I$ is an ideal of $R$. Show that $I = (p(X))$ for some $p(X)$ in $F[X]$. (Hint: consider a polynomial $p(X)$ of least degree in $I$.)  I'm trying to do this question but can't seem to start. if anyone could give me a hint that would be appreciated.  My instinct was to take a monic polynomial (which exists since we are in a field) of degree $1$ and divide given the first two parts of the question were about polynomial division.  Thanks. How do I install OpenStack? How do I install ? Is there an easier way other than official installation instructions? of Stack Overflow, all content posted on Stack Exchange sites by their users (i.e. you wonderful people) has been provided to the whole universe under . For my fellow non-lawyers, that license basically means:   Anyone can use any Stack Exchange posts at any time without having to ask for permission Making money off of the copied content is permitted You don't even have to copy stuff from here verbatim; you can just use it as a starting point and make whatever edits you want There are just two rules you have to follow:   You have to provide . Simple links to the original post and author info are just fine. You have to  and allow other people to use your content, as long as they follow these very same rules. How meta!    (If you ever forget any of that, and want to refresh your memory, the license info is linked to in the footer of every page.)  There are, in fact, a lot of people who republish varying amounts of our content for assorted reasons. Unfortunately, there are some Stack Content Republishers Attributing Poorly and/or Excelling at Ranking (SCRAPERs, for short).  In this context, "attributing poorly" means any use that doesn't follow our attribution rules or make any other reasonable attempt at give credit. This can get pretty egregious; I've seen SCRAPERs that not only don't link back to SE originals, but also use fake author info and post dates to make it harder to find originals. By "excelling at ranking," I'm referring to copycat sites that end up higher in Google results than the original SE sites do for the same content. That's not necessarily wrong, but in some cases, it indicates inappropriate SEO hackery.  So, the question is: what can you do if you spot a SCRAPER? Adding the PHP json extension Select node without namespace with XPath Signature/date line with fixed width