I want to type Arabic text in Photoshop, but the text appears disjointed and the letters do not connect at all. For example محمد appears as م ح م د.  I'm using Photoshop CC 2014 on Windows 8.1 64 bit.
I want to type Arabic text in Photoshop, but the text appears disjointed and the letters do not connect at all. For example محمد appears as م ح م د.   I'm using Photoshop CS6 on OSX Mountain Lion.
I know $[0,1]$ denotes the interval between 0 and 1 with the boundary. And $(0,1)$ denotes the interval between 0 and 1 without the boundary. Today, I encounter some expressions as $]0,1]$, $]-\infty,+\infty]$. What does $]0,1]$ mean? Thanks. How to generate a 2D array data structure in tikz? I need to illustrate a 2D array data structure in my document. This is a picture I found on the internet. I want something similar.    I also want to show the memory layout in the illustration. Something like this:   Can someone help me with drawing them in Tikz? Thanks in advance.  MWE  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{matrix,backgrounds}  \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[font=\ttfamily, array/.style={matrix of nodes,nodes={draw, minimum size=7mm, fill=green!30},column sep=-\pgflinewidth, row sep=0.5mm, nodes in empty cells, row 1/.style={nodes={draw=none, fill=none, minimum size=5mm}}, row 1 column 1/.style={nodes={draw}}}]  \matrix[array] (array) { 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 2 &amp; 3 &amp; 4 &amp; 5 &amp; 6 &amp; 7 &amp; 8 &amp; 9\\   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;  \\}; \node[draw, fill=gray, minimum size=4mm] at (array-2-9) (box) {};  \begin{scope}[on background layer] \fill[green!10] (array-1-1.north west) rectangle (array-1-10.south east); \end{scope}  \draw (array-1-1.north)--++(90:3mm) node [above] (first) {First index}; \draw (array-1-10.east)--++(0:3mm) node [right]{Indices}; \node [align=center, anchor=south] at (array-2-9.north west|-first.south) (8) {Element\\ (at index 8)}; \draw (8)--(box); % \end{tikzpicture} \\ \begin{tikzpicture}[font=\ttfamily, array/.style={matrix of nodes,nodes={draw, minimum size=7mm, fill=red!30},column sep=-\pgflinewidth, row sep=0.5mm, nodes in empty cells, row 1/.style={nodes={draw=none, fill=none, minimum size=5mm}}, row 1 column 1/.style={nodes={draw}}}]  \matrix[array] (array) {  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp; \\  &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;  \\}; % \end{tikzpicture} \\ \begin{tikzpicture}[font=\ttfamily, array/.style={matrix of nodes,nodes={draw, minimum size=7mm, fill=blue!30},column sep=-\pgflinewidth, row sep=0.5mm, nodes in empty cells, row 1/.style={nodes={draw=none, fill=none, minimum size=5mm}}, row 1 column 1/.style={nodes={draw}}}]  \matrix[array] (array) {  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp;  &amp; \\  &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;   &amp;  \\}; % \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} Which choice of line-breaking parameters gives the minimum number of lines How to evaluate environment variables into a string in Python? I have a string representing a path.  Because this application is used on Windows, OSX and Linux, we've defined environment variables to properly map volumes from the different file systems.  The result is:  "$C/test/testing"   What I want to do is evaluate the environment variables in the string so that they're replaced by their respective volume names.  Is there a specific command I'm missing, or do I have to take os.environ.keys() and manually replace the strings? Object-oriented shell for *nix "be accorded someone" or "be accorded to someone"? When the verb accord means "give or grant", should the passive voice be accorded someone or accorded to someone?  I came across several sentences in a book:     The attention accorded husband-wife relations in Muslim teachings thus confirmed the indigenous view of matrimony as a desirable state, with the birth of children considered essential for the full attainment of adulthood.      Similar processes occurred in Daoism, which percolated into Vietnam from southern China but never received the official patronage accorded Confucianism.   Shouldn't it be "accorded to husband-wife relations", as "given to husband-wife relations"? The use of nominative "whom" (as in “persons whom it is foreseeable are likely to...”) From  page 48 of Law: A Very Short Introduction, by Raymond Wacks:     In other words, you owe a duty to persons whom it is foreseeable are likely to be harmed by your conduct.   To try to parse this, temporarily overlook 'it is foreseeable'. Then persons is the subject of the verb phrase are likely to be harmed. So , should the relative pronoun for persons be who instead? Is my parse wrong?   Are the (deleted) comments right: that this style predominates in law texts? If this is correct grammar, what is the general rule? Is it commonly used in other contexts? Theorem 3.2 Rudin -- How is 0 concluded? I'm having trouble understanding why the arbitrariness of $\epsilon$ allows us to conclude that $d(p,p')&lt;0$. It seems we could likely conclude a value such as $\frac {\epsilon}{100}$ couldn't we?? The other idea that would normally work is the limit (as $n$ approaches $\infty$, $p$ approaches $p'$) but that would mean we are further in another sequence which would have same problem Thanks in advance   $\ $  $\ $  $\ $   Definition of Convergence     A sequence $\{ p_n \}$ in a metric space $X$ is said to converge if there us a point $p \in X$ with the following property: For every $ \epsilon&gt;0$ there is an integer $N$ such that $n \ge N$ implies distance function $d(p_n, p) &lt; \epsilon.$ I am looking to create realistic car movement using vectors Get in vs. get on Possible Duplicate:          I'm an EFL (English as a foreign language) teacher and I haven't been able to come up with a good principle for which preposition to use after get when referring to transportation.  Some examples:   Get in:   a car/taxi/van/truck, etc.  Get on:   a bus/plane/bike/truck, etc.    How can one choose whether to use in or on? Note that in some cases, such as the example with truck, either preposition is possible but the choice affects the meaning.  I've been telling my students that there is no rule, so they just have to memorize which preposition to use, but I'm really hoping I'm wrong.  This question would be better suited for the upcoming  Stack Exchange, but it hasn't entered beta yet. More . Can I have a mathematical equation within a caption? I'd like to have an eqnarray environment (or equivalent) within a table caption. If I do this naively,  \begin{table*}   % table stuff   \caption{\label{tab:my_tab}     \begin{eqnarray}       a &amp;=&amp; b \\ c &amp;=&amp; d     \end{eqnarray}   } \end{table*}   LaTeX falls over with LaTeX Error: \begin{table*} ended by \end{eqnarray}. How can I get what I want (I don't mind no equation numbers)? I want to transfer my current system hard drive to a larger hard drive. Doing so, I thought of creating an image of my system hard drive which is 320 GB in size.   Would I be able to restore this image on a larger hard drive? I plan buying a 1TB hard drive.  If yes, how? I prefer no data loss.  I am using Windows 7 Let $I$ and $J$ be ideals of a Noetherian ring $A$. If $JA_P\subseteq IA_P$ for every $P\in \operatorname{Ass}_A(A/I)$, then $J\subseteq I$.   I'm reading Matsumura's Commutative Ring Theory book on my own. This is exercise $6.4$ in that book, and I fail to prove it. Could you help me with this? Thanks in advance. I read a book of this series probably around 2000. I think the series was quite new then but not sure.  The main thing I remember about it is that magic is based on words of power. If you knew one word you got some extra ability, knowing two words gave you yet some other ability, and if you knew three words you became a very powerful wizard. Only one person at a time could know each word, and telling someone your word meant you died.  The main protagonist somehow gets hold of one word and then for some reason strives to learn more.  EDIT: I think that I accidentally picked up the second book of the series and never read the first one. From what I remember, the protagonist learned one word of power and got some kind of supernatural ability (cannot remember what though). He then ends up in some kind of challenge where he has to cooperate with another person who knows another word that gives super-strength.  Not very coherent memories, but I hope someone knows what series it is. It has been bugging me for years. (Not even sure if the series is good at all, but still would like to know the name.)  EDIT2:  I remember the world as being medieval-ish. I do not think there were dragons, but there may have been other humanoid races (I have a very weak recollection that there may have been an orc or similar in the story, but this could be completely wrong). The protagonist was male. Lets say we have a dependent variable $Y$ with few categories and set of independent variables.    What are the advantages of multinomial logistic regression over set of binary logistic regressions (i.e. )? By set of binary logistic regression I mean that for each category $y_{i} \in Y$ we build separate binary logistic regression model with target=1 when $Y=y_{i}$ and 0 otherwise. Can prematurely powering down a computer cause bad sectors in a hard drive? Suppose that we have a vector space $V$ and the subspaces $U=\{(x,x,y,y)\in F^4:x,y\in F\}$ and $W=\{(x,x,x,y)\in F^4:x,y\in F\}$. Then how comes $$U+W=\{(x,x,y,z)\in F^4:x,y,z\in F\}?$$ What can I do to increase battery life on my Android device? What can I do to get better battery life on my Droid? Battery life seems awful. Less than 15 hours or so on normal usage. How do I get Skyrim to recognize I don't have a follower anymore? How to troubleshoot unwanted white spaces smartly? Why is there a white space on the left side?  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{asymptote} \begin{document} \noindent \begin{asy} size(10cm,10cm); draw((0,0)--(100,100)); draw((0,100)--(100,0)); dot((50,50)); \end{asy} \end{document}