Snippet posts look bad in an old browser Look, I have a computer with 960 MB of RAM. I am not going to use Firefox. With this browser, it is using %55 of my memory. Instead I am using a Firefox fork, which is called , in version 2018.02.02 (64-bit). The questions with snippets I share how I see it:  At this point in my opinion if it were for the compatibility issue, Stack Overflow shouldn't be using jQuery. Well, I don't really like that framework, but if it's for practicality when programming the site I get it. Putting that comment aside... Is it possible to make the snippet not overlap with the comments? The version of my browser I have shown, if someone wants, they can install it on your systems to see that it is true. Update the browser? Not really, as I think, because they took a lot of things from it, according to the developers due to security problems, which does not worry me in the least.
Which browsers are officially supported, and what else do I need? Which browsers are officially supported by Stack Exchange?  Also, what else is needed in order to use every feature of the site?
Libraries module. Where to extract? Where should I be extracting the  module, sites/all/modules or sites/all/libraries? 'this is' or 'these are'? I have the following sentences.        This is our first arrival in the UK.   These are our first arrival in the UK.      I am not sure, which sentence is correct? How can I send mail from an iPhone application QGIS Processing - Additional Creation Parameter for GdalWarp I am having a hard time getting the "Additional Creation Parameters" to work when using GdalWarp through the processing toolbox.  I am trying to set the nodata value to 0 for the output raster.  processing.runalg("gdalogr:warpreproject","InRaster.tif","EPSG:32736","EPSG:32736",10,0,"-dstnodata 0","OutRaster.tif")   Has anyone used this functionality and managed to get it to work? Imagine a standard machine-learning scenario:     You are confronted with a large multivariate dataset and you have a   pretty blurry understanding of it. What you need to do is to make   predictions about some variable based on what you have. As usual, you   clean the data, look at descriptive statistics, run some models,   cross-validate them etc., but after several attempts, going back and   forth and trying multiple models nothing seems to work and your   results are miserable. You can spend hours, days, or weeks on such a   problem...   The question is: when to stop? How do you know that your data actually is hopeless and all the fancy models wouldn't do you any more good than predicting the average outcome for all cases or some other trivial solution?  Of course, this is a forecastability issue, but as far as I know, it is hard to assess forecastability for multivariate data before trying something on it. Or am I wrong?   Disclaimer: this question was inspired by this one  that did not attract much attention. It would be nice to have detailed answer to such question for reference. Functions satisfying $f\left( f(x)^2+f(y) \right)=xf(x)+y$ For all $a, m, n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$,   $$\gcd(a^n - 1, a^m - 1) = a^{\gcd(n, m)} - 1$$ After lethal first strike damage to an indestructible creature, will it still do damage? If I were to attack with a 4/4 indestructible creature and it's blocked by a 4/2 creature with first strike, would my indestructible creature still attack during the second combat damage step, or would it just tap, not assigning any damage? Is there a way to reorganize the fields/attributes in a data extension?  I've added some extra fields that relate to other fields in that extension.   I haven't found a way to regroup those fields. Showing arrowheads in line end using QGIS? Find the maximum value of $ f(x) = \int^{x}_{0} \sqrt{(x^2-x)^2+y^4}~dy$ Find the maximum value of $f(x)$ when $0 \leq x \leq 1$ and $$ f(x) = \int^{x}_{0} \sqrt{(x^2-x)^2+y^4}~dy$$   I'm guessing that the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus can't be used because the integrand is a function of $x$.  Any help would be greatly appreciated. Pass shell variable as a /pattern/ to awk Implementation of "show" for function How can I install Skype on 32-bit Ubuntu 14.04? In MK (Morse-Kelley) set theory life is easy: $\forall X\forall y\left(y\in\bigcap X\leftrightarrow\forall x\left(x\in X\rightarrow y\in x\right)\right)$. If $X=\left\{\right\}$ then $\bigcap X=U$, where $U$ is the universal class. So the (unary) intersection of the empty set is the class that contains all sets as elements. In ZF (Zermelo-Fraenkel) set theory, instead, proper classes are not allowed. So, how can I define $\bigcap X$ in ZF? I tried with the following definitions:   $\forall X\left(X\not=\left\{\right\}\rightarrow\forall y\left(y\in\bigcap X\leftrightarrow\forall x\left(x\in X\rightarrow y\in x\right)\right)\right)$. This means that $\bigcap\left\{\right\}$ is undefined, which is not that good. $\forall X\forall y\left(y\in\bigcap X\leftrightarrow X\not=\left\{\right\}\land\forall x\left(x\in X\rightarrow y\in x\right)\right)$. This means that $\bigcap\left\{\right\}=\left\{\right\}$, which is the opposite of MK.   I couldn't find any other valuable definition. Any ideas? Thank you. How are the number of views in a question calculated? I saw it's not just a page views number, because, if I press F5 several times, it won't increase the number of views.  They could store my IP address in a table, but wouldn't that make it slow? They would need to query a database one more time for each request. Simulating Key Press C# Are there any stats about the percentage of close reasons used to close questions   Successfully (preferably, based on the number of closed questions) Unsuccessfully (alternatively, the total percentags of close votes cast by users)   ?   Is there any way to get this from the query explorer? Independence of points from same underlying function I have a function $y=sin(x)$  I sample the points $ x_i=\{0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1\}$ and $$ y_i=sin(x_i) + \epsilon \  \ \epsilon \sim iid\ Normal$$  Now given only the set $\{x_i,y_i\}$ I want to uncover the underlying functional form $f(x)$ given as  $$y=f(x)+\epsilon \ \ \ \ \epsilon \sim iid\ Normal  $$  My question is : ARE $y_i$'s independent ?  My intuition is that $y_1$ and $y_2$ are not independent. This is because given a new ${x}$ say ${x_\star}$ we can use $y_i$'s to learn some information about ${y_\star}$.   Does the fact that the input points come from the same underlying function make them somehow correlated or posses commonalities ? and if not why do most methods (ex: Non-parametric splines, Gaussian process) use the $y_i$'s to get information and learn ${y_\star}$ ? Isn't the fact that if samples are independent then they can't learn new information from each other ? Make hyperref take pdfinfo from \title and \author I once read about an option for hyperref that automatically takes the info provided via the standard \author and \title, and puts it into the pdfinfo. Now I want to implement it in my template and can't find it anywhere in the hyperref manual nor anywhere else.  Did I dream about this or can someone help me out here?  (A similar, but more general question: )