When I zoom out in the view window, my object is not being shown entirely.    Can anyone help understand why this is happening and how to fix it?  My Hardware specification: i7 2.80GHz NVidia GTX 1050 4GB 8GB RAM Windows 10
I'm having an odd issue - When I try to zoom in on a detail using my MMB, the "camera" in the 3D view seems to be cutting off the exterior surface of my object and showing me the inside instead. I'd expect this behavior, but only when I was much more zoomed in.  If I zoom out a bit (one click on the scroll wheel) then I can see the exterior as I intend.  Is there any way to adjust this behavior?  Thanks!
How can I automatically add some skeleton code when creating a new file with vim When creating a new file with vim, I would like to automatically add some skeleton code.  For example, when creating a new xml file, I would like to add the first line:    &lt;?xml version="1.0"?&gt;   Or when creating an html file, I would like to add:  &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"&gt; &lt;html&gt;   &lt;head&gt;     &lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;   &lt;/head&gt;   &lt;body&gt;   &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt; What does the complex electric field show? We have a complex electric field. Is there any definition for absolute and imaginary part of a complex electric field? What do they stand for? amsalpha-like bibtex style with manual labels How can I automatically download lyrics in iTunes? Is there a way to automatically download lyrics in iTunes? When playing as a spellcaster, is it valid the use of the Ready action to prepare Dispel Magic to counter a spell cast by an opponent? In the same vein, when declaring said action, do I have to specify which spell slot I will use when Readying the Dispel Magic spell? If that is the case, does this tactic nullify an opponent's spell? I get the impression that this is basically turning Dispel Magic into a spell with a casting time of &quot;1 reaction&quot;. Is my reading of the rules accurate? The following code best describes the situation.  Why is the last line not outputting the trailing newline char?  Each line's output is shown in the comment.  I'm using GNU bash, version 4.1.5          echo -n $'a\nb\n'                  | xxd -p  # 610a620a              x=$'a\nb\n'   ; echo -n "$x" | xxd -p  # 610a620a      echo -ne "a\nb\n"                  | xxd -p  # 610a620a x="$(echo -ne "a\nb\n")" ; echo -n "$x" | xxd -p  # 610a62 Show $GCD(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n)$ is the least positive integer that can be expressed in the form $a_1x_1+a_2x_2+ \ldots +a_nx_n$ Given $a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n$ not all zero, show $\gcd(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n)$ is the least positive integer that can be expressed in the form $a_1x_1+a_2x_2+ \ldots +a_nx_n$. Also deduce $a_1x_1+a_2x_2+ \ldots +a_nx_n = b$ has solutions $\iff \gcd(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n)|b$.   I know that $ax+by=n$ has integer solutions $\iff \gcd(a,b)|n$. I'll need to use induction to show $a_1x_1+a_2x_2+ \ldots +a_nx_n = \gcd(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n)$ has solutions, and then I will be able to say that as $\gcd(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n) | a_1x_1+a_2x_2+ \ldots +a_nx_n $ for any $x_1,x_2, x_3 \ldots x_n$ then $c \leq \gcd(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n)$ and $c \geq \gcd(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n)$, and thus $c=\gcd(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots , a_n)$. Sometimes it is convenient to use an absolute path to include a preamble. To do so, I use the following "hack":  \documentclass[a4paper, 12pt]{article} \newcommand{\folder}{/path/to/folder} \input{\folder/preamble}  \begin{document} \end{document}   Now my question is, whether there is a more elegant way to do this, especially a way which is compatible with one of the flatten scripts from  ? The Bash man page describes use of ${!a} to return the contents of the variable whose name is the contents of a (a level of indirection).  I'd like to know how to return all elements in an array using this, i.e.,  a=(one two three) echo ${a[*]}   returns  one two three   I would like for:  b=a echo ${!b[*]}   to return the same.  Unfortunately, it doesn't, but returns 0 instead.  Update  Given the replies, I now realise that my example was too simple, since of course, something like:  b=("${a[@]}")   Will achieve exactly what I said I needed.  So, here's what I was trying to do:  LIST_lys=(lys1 lys2) LIST_diaspar=(diaspar1 diaspar2)  whichone=$1   # 'lys' or 'diaspar'  _LIST=LIST_$whichone LIST=${!_LIST[*]}   Of course, carefully reading the Bash man page shows that this won't work as expected because the last line simply returns the indices of the "array" $_LIST (not an array at all).  In any case, the following should do the job (as pointed out):  LIST=($(eval echo \${$_LIST[*]}))   or ... (the route that I went, eventually):  LIST_lys="lys1 lys2" ... LIST=(${!_LIST})   Assuming, of course, that elements don't contain whitespace. If I leave fully-cooked food (particularly meat) out at warm temperature - say on the counter or in a crock pot that's been turned off -  how long will it stay safe to eat?  Does it make any difference if I re-cook the food afterward? Does copying a spell from a scroll into your spellbook consume the scroll? The text on page 32 of the Basic Rules that talks about copying spells does not explicitly state that the process consumes the scroll. Does it? How can I hibernate or sleep my Ubuntu 10.10 desktop and have it "wake up" the next day?  I have seen software that can do this on windows, so it can't be hard on Ubuntu! QGtkStyle was unable to detect the current GTK+ theme When I start any Qt app, I get this message in the terminal, and the Qt app doesn't use the same theme as my Gtk apps:  QGtkStyle was unable to detect the current GTK+ theme.   How do I make QGtkStyle detect my current GTK+ theme?  It seems that LXDE is using a settings daemon, and there is no gtkrc-2.0 file in my home folder. i keep getting the script error problem every time i try using polygon to raster tool in ArcGIS 10.1. Please help me how I can solve this?  screenshot embedded How far do you go with const?  Do you just make functions const when necessary or do you go the whole hog and use it everywhere?  For example, imagine a simple mutator that takes a single boolean parameter:  void SetValue(const bool b) { my_val_ = b; }   Is that const actually useful?  Personally I opt to use it extensively, including parameters, but in this case I wonder if it's worthwhile?  I was also surprised to learn that you can omit const from parameters in a function declaration but can include it in the function definition, e.g.:  .h file  void func(int n, long l);   .cpp file  void func(const int n, const long l)   Is there a reason for this? It seems a little unusual to me. Rigor in quantum field theory I was making a scene in blender and I wanted to change the texture from "Material_1" to "Material_2". It lets me change it but when I go to rendered view the part looks the same. can someone please help me I need to know the ip address of another machine in a lan network.  What is the Windows command for getting ip address from machine name and vice versa? Computing convex hull of points using shapely When to use RSA and when ElGamal asymmetric encryption