Can I use "which" and "that" together? I love everybody, but it is your ignorance that which I cannot stand.   Can I say that which in the statement I made?
"that which" used together When I read essays from Eliot, I find him using "that which" frequently, e.g.        the combination which is the murder of Agamemnon is probably as complex as that which is the voyage of Ulysses.   A very small part of acting is that which takes place on the stage!   They belong to a different race. Their crudity is that which was of the Roman, as compared with the Greek, in real life.      I can kind of guess its usage, but I want to know more about this grammar structure. Searching on Google mostly gave me the simple difference between "that" and "which", and some examples using "that which":        that which we call a rose (from "Romeo and Juliet")   that which we persist in doing      It is a pity that Google search does not direct me to any useful page about "that which".  Can someone explicate its grammar for me?
I went through a , but the answer was informing how to hide the monitor, but not how to disable it. I do not want any new windows to creep into the laptop display when the external display is connected. I could not find any in the Display Settings (under System Preferences). I don't want to close the lid because I think it impacts the air flow of the MacBook Pro. I don't want to close the lid because the sound quality is reduced. "Install VMware Tools" greyed out after installing ubuntu 15.04 on vmware player 7.1 "Install VMware Tools" greyed out after installing Ubuntu 15.04 on VMware Player 7.1. I tried checking "No proxy" instead of default "Windows proxy settings" at "File->Preferences->Software updates-> Connection Settings". This did not work either. Is there a way to install VMware Tools? Explain the plane scene in The Dark Knight Rises? In The Dark Knight Rises, at the beginning of the film Bane kidnapped a guy from the plane, then he drew blood from the guy he kidnapped. And then throughout the movie I didn't see any news regarding this kidnap scene. But, before the end of the movie we find out that the guy kidnapped by Bane was Dr Pavel. Bane needed him to convert the fusion project into a nuclear bomb and Dr Pavel was the only guy who could have done it.   But I don't understand, why did he draw blood from Dr Pavel? How can I calculate what the effect of an extension tube will be? What does it do exactly if I click in the window of cmd? Suppose I run cmd.exe and ping localhost. After that I ping localhost again but I click into the window and the ping stops until I press enter.  What happens exactly when I click into the window? Does it suspend the process or something else? I attached a screenshot to clarify this issue.  Note: I do not actually click but drag using the mouse which creates a white box in the window as you can see on the screenshot.  Edit: further clarification: What I really wish to know is whether dragging the window halts the cmd process or not?  Edit: even more clarification: I know that I'm using Quick Edit and pressing enter copies the contents I selected. What I do not know is what happens in the background. Prove $P(x,y)$: If $x$ and $y$ are odd integers, then the product  $xy$ must also be odd.   I need a direct proof of this.  I know that $ x $ and $y$ both have to equal to $2n+1$ in order for them to be odd. But that's all I have. Any help will be appreciated. Autorun.inf in Windows 8/8.1 for USB Drives I have created a file named autorun.inf to make one of my software setup run when the usb is plugged into Windows 8/8.1 OS .  This is my autorun.inf code:   [AutoRun] shellexecute="Mem.exe //It would be nice if i could add path to this like my Doc//mem.exe UseAutoPlay=1   Is there any software that let's us to create auto-run files for USB Sticks?  Is there any way to add new options in right click menu only on my USB window? I believe that umask is something that controls , but do not fully understand it.  After running umask 0644 in a , I cannot read the files I create with the command-line text editor nano. I noticed that the permissions of that file are set to 0022 instead of the default 0755.  How does umask work? I thought I could just remove the each digit in the umask from 0777, 7 - 6 = 1 and 7 - 4 = 3, so I expect the permissions to be 0133, but apparently, this is not the case.   What is umask exactly? Explain it to me like I was a "Linux noob" How do I calculate with umask? What are use cases for umask? Application is "Ready to Sale" but not reflected on iTunes Store Would it be possible for some to bend two elements? After reading this question  While it seems that it would break one of the rules of the show, that only the avatar can master all four elements. There would also be good reasons as to why someone couldn't learn all four, there is always the opposing element that is hardest for the Avatar to learn. I don't see any reason why someone couldn't learn to bend two elements (not master, but just bend since Thadeus's Answer  to the previous question is apparently the Definitive Answer on the subject.)    Many benders do learn to bend beyond their element such as Toph becoming a metal bender and Katarra bending blood. Now metal is considered part of the Earth but so is sand and it seems that sand is moved more like water. Iroh was able to adapt a water bender technique to fire bending which means it is possible to learn and use different bending styles. Also Iroh spent time connecting to the spirit world and that seems to be the main reason the Avatar is able to bend all 4 elements. So if someone was connected to the spirit world or even their past life that would fulfill that requirement.   Would it be possible to bend two elements?  There do seem to be times where it has been done in the series such as bending mud which is both Earth and Water. And there would definitely be limits such as a Earth bender couldn't bend Air and a Water bender couldn't bend Fire. But why couldn't a Fire Bender learn to bend Air. They both use breath control as a main focus of their bending. It also states on the Energybending wiki entry that all bending used to be done as an inner bending but that it became element bending.   So with new bending techniques being formed all the time, already stated used of combined elements being used, an assumed spiritual connection to a past life or a spiritual journey been taken, energybending rediscovered is it possible that two elements could be bent by one bender who is not the Avatar? I run below command on ubuntu 16.4 :  sudo add-apt-repository ppa:noobslab/apps  of below question:    and get below error:  Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/bin/add-apt-repository", line 11, in &lt;module&gt;     from softwareproperties.SoftwareProperties import SoftwareProperties, shortcut_handler   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/softwareproperties/SoftwareProperties.py", line 27, in &lt;module&gt;     import apt_pkg ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'apt_pkg' Error in sys.excepthook: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 63, in apport_excepthook     from apport.fileutils import likely_packaged, get_recent_crashes   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/__init__.py", line 5, in &lt;module&gt;     from apport.report import Report   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/report.py", line 30, in &lt;module&gt;     import apport.fileutils   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/fileutils.py", line 23, in &lt;module&gt;     from apport.packaging_impl import impl as packaging   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/packaging_impl.py", line 23, in &lt;module&gt;     import apt   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/__init__.py", line 23, in &lt;module&gt;     import apt_pkg ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'apt_pkg'  Original exception was: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/bin/add-apt-repository", line 11, in &lt;module&gt;     from softwareproperties.SoftwareProperties import SoftwareProperties, shortcut_handler   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/softwareproperties/SoftwareProperties.py", line 27, in &lt;module&gt;     import apt_pkg ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'apt_pkg'   Thanks for help $\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n}=l$ ; Prove $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty a_k$ converges iff $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty b_k$ converges. Written, in Ex.8 Ch.9.1 of the book Advanced Calculus by P. M. Fitzpatrick :     Suppose that $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty a_k$ and $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty b_k$ are series of positive numbers such that $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n}=l \ \ \ \text{and} \ l&gt;0.$$ Prove that the series $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty a_k$ converges iff the series $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty b_k$ converges.   Am I correct by the following (sketch of) proof? :  1- For a given $\epsilon_1$ there is $N_1$ such that $\left|\frac{a_n}{b_n} - l\right| &lt; \epsilon_1$ for all $n \ge N_1$.  2- Since the series $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty a_k$ converges, for a given $\epsilon_2$ there is $N_2$ such that $\left|b_{n+1}+\dots+b_{n+k}\right|&lt; \epsilon_1$ for all $n \ge N_2$ any for all natural numbers $k$.  3- Define $N = \max {\{N_1,N_2}\}$.   4- From Step (1), $a_{n+k} &lt; (\epsilon_1+l) b_{n+k}$ for all $n \ge N$ any for all natural numbers $k$. [Also, $a_i$'s and $b_i$'s are all positive]. Thus $a_{n+1}+\dots+a_{n+k} &lt; (\epsilon_1+l) (b_{n+1}+\dots+b_{n+k})&lt; \epsilon_3$. Then the convergence of the series $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty b_k$ implies the convergence of the series $\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty a_k$.  5- For the reverse implication, we use the fact that $\lim\limits_{n \to \infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}=l \iff \lim\limits_{n \to \infty}\frac{b_n}{a_n}= \frac{1}{l}= l' &gt;0$ and repeat the process this time for a and b exchanged.   6- The Quotient Property For Sequences hold for a nonzero limit in the denominator, but since the limit in the numerator also is zero so we may use the The Quotient Property For Sequences.    Thanks. How do I update jQuery to the latest version I can download? What is the simplest SQL Query to find the second largest value? Why is free will a widely discussed, established concept? Does this concept emerge from religious / spiritual doctrine? Why is there so much interest in this topic?  If a neural-network based AI machine with a certain high degree of complexity scores a perfect 100 every run in a turing test, have we not already refuted the idea of free will? In fact, let me extend this reasoning, if ANY machine scores a single point in a turing test (and not 100), have we not already disproved (or alternatively put in great doubt the existence of) free will? If we already created a machine that can master a certain degree of human interaction, have we not then demonstrated that human interaction is programmable? (given enough time for the creation of a complex or more appropriately elaborative neural system).   From the perspective of an external observer, such a machine would be qualitatively human although intrinsically quantitative behind a stream of 1's and 0's. It would exhibit a type of decision making indistinguishable from that of a human. Does this not reduce the type of decision making we understand to be "free will" to something quantitative, deterministic, materialist? What happens if a target for removal becomes ineligible after a card has been cast? When you have a card like  which reads "Exile Target Creature with power 3 or less", as I understand it, it becomes untargetable if the opponent's creature power increases thanks to a pump spell like .  But what if the Disregard is already on the stack and targeting; and they respond with Brute Strength? I'm pretty sure (and my opponent with Brute Strength was certain) that it won't exile the creature, but I don't know which rule states this, and there's no gatherer ruling on the spell. In Python, what's the difference between 'except Exception as e' and 'except Exception, e' I am confused. I don't understand the difference a ARMA and a GARCH process.. to me there are the same no ?  Here is the (G)ARCH(p, q) process  $$\sigma_t^2 =      \underbrace{     \underbrace{      \alpha_0       + \sum_{i=1}^q \alpha_ir_{t-i}^2}     _{ARCH}        + \sum_{i=1}^p\beta_i\sigma_{t-i}^2}     _{GARCH}$$  And here is the ARMA($p, q$):  $$ X_t = c + \varepsilon_t +  \sum_{i=1}^p \varphi_i X_{t-i} + \sum_{i=1}^q \theta_i \varepsilon_{t-i}.\,$$  Is the ARMA simply an extension of the GARCH, GARCH being used only for returns and with the assumption $r = \sigma\varepsilon$ where $\varepsilon$ follows a strong white process? Simplifying and evaluating $\cot 70^\circ+4\cos 70^\circ$ What’s the rule for adding “-er” vs. “-or” when forming an agent noun from a verb? What’s the rule to decide whether you add -er or whether you add -or when creating an agent noun from a verb?    Sometimes it’s -er:      read > reader hate > hater hit > hitter   But other times it’s -or:    meditate > meditator collect > collector