Here's the full sentence: "These men, all of who were well-known, well-respected statesmen, were viewed by their peers and common people alike as great thinkers in their day.  I just can't really see where it would fall into: subject? predicate? object? What would it be?
I can never figure out whether I should use who and whom. Most people use who for both colloquially, but some people say this is not correct.  What’s the rule for using who and whom correctly?
How to update Wine to the latest version? Remove ajax call from regular links with jQuery Mobile HTML form readonly SELECT tag/input I really tried hard to do this on my own, but I keep failing ... Using multi-column and multi-row commands confused me. I know some of you might frown upon such a request but I really need help getting this table implemented .. So I'm sorry if I upset anyone.  My preamble has :   \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report} \usepackage[lmargin=3.81cm,tmargin=2.54cm,rmargin=2.54cm,bmargin=2.52cm]{geometry} \linespread{1.5}     Is there a way I can convert this from excel to LaTeX form ? I tried an add-in before but it didn't work for me. Also online generators cannot combine cells the way I want them (unless I didn't find a better table generator ? ) Get a list of dates between two dates Using standard mysql functions is there a way to write a query that will return a list of days between two dates.  eg given 2009-01-01 and 2009-01-13 it would return a one column table with the values:   2009-01-01   2009-01-02   2009-01-03  2009-01-04   2009-01-05  2009-01-06  2009-01-07  2009-01-08   2009-01-09  2009-01-10  2009-01-11  2009-01-12  2009-01-13   Edit: It appears I have not been clear. I want to GENERATE this list. I have values stored in the database (by datetime) but want them to be aggregated on a left outer join to a list of dates as above (I am expecting null from the right side of some of this join for some days and will handle this). Using Boolean parameters in Python Script Tool of ArcPy? I'm using ArcGIS for Desktop 10.3.0.4322 I have a script tool which requires a parameter (folder path to a gdB, via GetParameterAsText) so that a later process can be saved there. The thing I want to do is make an Optional Boolean parameter, that when checked, automatically fills in the folder path gdB parameter. The Boolean text asks the user, &quot;Use default workspace?&quot;, to which if they check the box (boolean == True), then the folder path parameter will be automatically defaulted (saving the user a small amount of time). I have already created the Boolean parameter in the script tool, I am however unaware of how to &quot;fill in&quot; the required parameter based on the user's Boolean. Code Snippet: # Ask user to select the Geodatabase workspace to use for data output userWorkspace = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0)  # Ask user if they want to use default workspace (boolean) useDefault = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(1)  # If user wants default workspace, then give it to the required parameter (0) if useDefault == True:  arcpy.env.workspace = path else:  # Set workspace environment based upon user's choice  arcpy.env.workspace = userWorkspace When I place a multipage pdf file into InDesign CC, the pages go outside of my document settings, making this function useless.  What do I have to do to make the placed  pdf pages go within my document settings, which in this case is 11 in. Length X 8.5 in. width, .5 in. margins on all sides, with two columns per page. I would greatly appreciate an answer to this, Thank you. 1st example:  \starttypescript [\s!serif] [paratype]   \definefontsynonym [ParatypeSerif-Regular] [\s!name:PTSerif-Regular] [\s!features=\s!default]   \definefontsynonym [ParatypeSerif-Italic] [\s!name:PTSerif-Italic] [\s!features=\s!default]   \definefontsynonym [ParatypeSerif-Bold] [\s!name:PTSerif-Bold] [\s!features=\s!default]   \definefontsynonym [ParatypeSerif-BoldItalic] [\s!name:PTSerif-BoldItalic] [\s!features=\s!default] \stoptypescript   2nd example:  \definefont[SerifS][\s!file:GenBkBasR at \smallfontsize]   Is \s! only related to fonts? Should I use it in my typescript files? Which are the standard commands available in every Linux based distribution? Delete from uitableview + write to plist not working How does CoffeeScript's existential operator work? How can I keep a folder synchronized to an external USB hard drive? I have a growing music collection which I manually keep in sync with an external USB drive. Sometimes I edit their ID3 tags, add or delete a file in either the hard drive or the USB drive, and I would like to keep those changes synchronized between both.  Does Ubuntu has something available that would help me with this scenario? Preferably something easy to use with a UI.  Update: To clarify my question, changes may happen on both the local hard drive or the USB drive, so the sync process must be on both directions. Is the cardinality of the Cartesian product of two equinumerous infinite sets the same as the cardinality of any one of the sets? I couldn't find this explicitly stated in any handout or text. This certainly seems to be true from the examples I have seen:  The Cartesian product of two infinitely countable sets is again infinitely countable. The Cartesian product of two sets with cardinality of continuum again has cardinality of continuum. I've been studying the postulates of QM and seeing how to derive important ideas from them. One thing that I haven't been able to derive from them, however, is the identity of the momentum operator.  For simplicity, I'm only thinking about no relativistic effects, no spin, no time-dependent potentials, and one spatial dimension. Also I'm assuming the position operator is simply multiplication by $x$, as in, I'm in position space. So the Hamiltonian operator is  $ H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V$.  I know that the momentum operator is $p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$.  But how do I get there from the postulates? I know that it makes sense, as it results in the Ehrenfest Theorem, the De Broglie wavelength hypothesis, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (for $x$ and $p$), the momentum operator being the generator of the translation operator, and possibly many other desirable theorems, and correlations with classical momentum.  But none of these are postulates (at least, not in the various formalisms I encountered), so you can't derive $p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ from them. Rather, they are consequences of it. You need to know the operator beforehand to see that they are correct. Yes, this is just semantics, but that is the core issue for me:  Regardless of how much sense it makes, is the identity $p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ (under the assumptions I made) a Postulate, meaning that you can't derive it from other postulates, or can it in fact be obtained from them? And in the latter case, could you show me how?  Note: I know that there are many different and equivalent sets of postulates for QM. But in none that I saw did they name it as a postulate nor properly derived it. A story about the world split into three realms This is a series I read partially something like 15 years ago (I think). It is set in a universe with magic of some sort - I think the magic was derived from geological processes (?). One of the things I remember - which was the reason I abandoned the series - was that it grew ever more gory; when I stopped reading, one of the main protagonists was flayed alive.   I only remember fragments - there were hints that the universe had been magically split into three or four parts, three relatively normal parts and The Void. I remember there was a powerful person/ruler called Tensor, and a kind of monstrous race with powerful magic, called 'Lorsk', which originated in the void and had evolved from humans that had been trapped there.  I'm a bit ambivalent about reading the series again - it seemed to be a never-ending death spiral of soap operatic proportions, but I'd like to see if my impression from then was actually right. Conjugate class in the dihedral group JavaScript 64 bit numeric precision Is there a way to represent a number with higher than 53-bit precision in JavaScript? In other words, is there a way to represent 64-bit precision number?  I am trying to implement some logic in which each bit of a 64-bit number represents something. I lose the lower significant bits when I try to set bits higher than 2^53.  Math.pow(2,53) + Math.pow(2,0) == Math.pow(2,53)   Is there a way to implement a custom library or something to achieve this? I am trying to draw the below given figure. Please help me to plot it in Tikz. I am only able to plot concentric circles. . I would like to have different colors in between different circles. Also, the text should be along the curve. The arrow in between the two concentric circles does not have to overlap with the circle on the right hand side.  I would be grateful if you could help me in plotting this in Tikz. Please let me know if you need more information. Thanks!  \documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}  \ifCLASSINFOpdf  \else  \fi  \usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{positioning} \usetikzlibrary{arrows} \usetikzlibrary{shapes.multipart} \usepackage[caption=false]{subfig} \usepackage{tabularx,tikz} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{color} \usepackage{pdfpages} \begin{document}  \title{Practice Tex}   \maketitle  \section{Introduction}  \begin{figure} \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}     \draw(0,0) circle (0.4cm)   node[draw=none,sloped,above]{cxvzxcv};         \draw(0,0) circle (0.75cm) node[draw=none,sloped,above]{ratio};    \draw(0,0) circle (1.25cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,2.2) {22};    \draw(0,0) circle (2cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,3.8) {33333};    \draw(0,-9) circle (0.4cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-9) {fsgsdgf};      \draw(0,-9) circle (0.75cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-7.8) {fgdsfg};    \draw(0,-9) circle (1.25cm) node[midway,sloped] at (0,-9) {dfsdfad};    \draw(0,-9) circle (2.8cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-6.4) {dfsdfsd};    \draw(0,-9) circle (3.2cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-6) {dfsdfsd};    \draw(0,-9) circle (3.6cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-5.6) {sfdsfd};    \draw(0,-9) circle (4.4cm);   \node[draw=none,align=center, font=\scriptsize,text width = 1.25cm] at (0,-4.8) {sdfsf};     \pgfsetlinewidth{3pt}    \draw [-implies][-&gt;] (0,-4) -- (0,-4.6);   \end{tikzpicture}  \end{center} \end{figure} \end{document} How do I contact other users? How can I contact another user, if that user has not specified any contact details in their profile? Without using Axiom of Choice, prove that $$\forall\alpha\geq\omega,~~|L_\alpha|=|\alpha|,$$  in which $\alpha$ is an ordinals, $\omega$ is the set of natural numbers, $L_\alpha$ is the $\alpha$-th constructiable set, $|x|$ is the cardinals of $x$.  I am learning a set theory, and I have read a proof by using AC. The AC is used only when $\alpha$ is a limit ordinals during the transfinite inductive method for $\alpha$ . I wonder if there is a proof without AC. 　THANKS!