I have two arrays by array_merge() that look like this:   Array(             [1] =&gt; Array(                   [date] =&gt; 2018-09-25                   [size_one] =&gt; 'XL'                   [name_one] =&gt; 'Shoes'                 )             [2] =&gt; Array(                     [date] =&gt; 2018-09-25                     [size_two] =&gt; 'L'                     [name_two] =&gt; 'Shirt'                 )             [3] =&gt; Array(                     [date] =&gt; 2018-09-26                     [size_two] =&gt; 'L'                     [name_two] =&gt; 'Shirt'                 )             )   If same date value, I need as a result something like the following:  Array(                 [1] =&gt; Array(                       [date] =&gt; 2018-09-25                       [size_one] =&gt; 'XL'                       [name_one] =&gt; 'Shoes'                       [size_two] =&gt; 'L'                       [name_two] =&gt; 'Shirt'                     )                 [2] =&gt; Array(                         [date] =&gt; 2018-09-26                         [size_two] =&gt; 'L'                         [name_two] =&gt; 'Shirt'                     )                 )   want to be able to put these into an array for laravel,  Can someone show me the proper way to merge these arrays?
We have two PHP5 objects and would like to merge the content of one into the second. There are no notion of subclasses between them so the solutions described in the following topic cannot apply.    //We have this: $objectA-&gt;a; $objectA-&gt;b; $objectB-&gt;c; $objectB-&gt;d;  //We want the easiest way to get: $objectC-&gt;a; $objectC-&gt;b; $objectC-&gt;c; $objectC-&gt;d;   Remarks:   These are objects, not classes. The objects contain quite a lot of fields so a foreach would be quite slow. So far we consider transforming objects A and B into arrays then merging them using array_merge() before re-transforming into an object but we can't say we are proud if this.
For a prime $p \equiv 1$ or $3$  (mod $8$), show that the equation $x^{2} + 2y^{2} = p$ has a solution.   I'd like to see an elementary proof. Does a Magic Staff count as a magic weapon? Many creatures have resistance to weapons that aren't "magic weapons".  A Magic Staff can be used as a quarterstaff, but (usually) doesn't have a bonus to hit (a "plus").  Is it considered a Magic Weapon for the purpose of damage resistance? How do I get a book graphic and description from the Amazon Book API? sends an ISBN number to Amazon and gets back a small bit of XML including author, title, and publisher.  However, I also want to get small, medium and large graphic and book descriptions of the title.  Problem: I can find no REST URL examples/documention that work, either at Google or when logged into my "AWS Account" at Amazon Associates.  I find a lot of examples from 2003-2005 but they are all out-of-date and give errors, it seems that Amazon's cloud web services have obfuscated their simple REST API documentation for their books.  Can anyone point me to some documentation on how I can get detailed information about books at Amazon via REST/XML?   Here's what I have tried so . $f'(x) = [f(x)]^{2}$. Prove $f(x) = 0 $ Let $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a differentiable function such that $f(0) = 0$ and $f'(x) = [f(x)]^{2}$, $\forall x \in \mathbb{R}$. Show that $f(x) = 0$,  $\forall x \in \mathbb{R} $.  I first (unsuccessfully) tried using the Mean Value Theorem, but this is in the Integrals chapter so the solution probably involves them. Can't really see where integrals come in here though.  What I've got so far:   (i) Since $f$ is differentiable, thus it is continuous and, hence,  integrable. Therefore $f^2$ is also integrable and as $f'=f^2$, $f'$ is too.   (ii) $f' \geq 0$, $\forall x \in \mathbb{R}$ I wandered too far to go look for sheep and now I'm on a completely different island.  How do I find my way back to my house? Sorry for the title, it is not very evident and intuitive but I really do not how to tell it better...  Well, you know, several times, or better, many times, we use this form:  If I want to say:      "development of special weapons was   the first point in Hitler's   program..."   I will say this (a better form):      "special weapon development was..."   OK...  is it      "special weapon development"   or      "special weapons development" (note   the plural...)   what's the grammar rule in order to understand how to use this very used form? UK Standard Visitor visa application to sit for PLAB 1 without savings or job When I have .txt files or .py files, I can Quick Look those files in Finder. I have .jl files that are codes written in the Julia Language. Of course they are text files. They will open in a text editor like Sublime Text. How can I Quick Look these .jl files in Finder? Is there a term for a foreign word that looks like an English word but has a completely different meaning? examples:         Gift (German) = poison   poisson (French) = fish   embarazada (Spanish) = pregnant   sauce (Spanish) = willow   triviale (Italian) = vulgar   parentes (Portuguese) = relatives   slim (Dutch) = smart I have a Category entity which has a Nullable ParentId field. When the method below is executing and the categoryId is null, the result seems null however there are categories which has null ParentId value.  What is the problem in here, what am I missing?  public IEnumerable&lt;ICategory&gt; GetSubCategories(long? categoryId) {     var subCategories = this.Repository.Categories.Where(c =&gt; c.ParentId == categoryId)         .ToList().Cast&lt;ICategory&gt;();      return subCategories; }   By the way, when I change the condition to (c.ParentId == null),  result seems normal. Imaginary line on the Earth is straight or not? I was watching Google map. Saw a line which is joinging north to south pole. It is going between middle of China and Mexico. But, the line is not straight. Tried to search in net but not able to get anything. Can anyone check and let me know  or Fundamental group of a torus with points removed Question 5.33 from "Topology and its Applications"  by Baesner is to compute the fundamental group of the torus ($T^2$) with $n$ points removed. I can "see" in my mind that if we remove one point we get a bouquet of two circles. Less clear is what happens when we remove two (or more) points. Any hints? Setting DIV width and height in JavaScript Lattices are congruence-distributive Is any quotient of a Euclidean domain by a prime ideal a Euclidean domain? Let $R$ be a Euclidean domain, i.e., a ring with a norm $N : R \rightarrow \mathbb N$ such that for any $a,b\in R$ with $b\not=0$, we may write $a = qb + r$ for some $q,r \in R$ with $N(r) &lt; N(b)$. Let $I$ be a prime ideal of $R$, so $R/I$ is a domain. Must $R/I$ in fact be a Euclidean domain?   I know that this is true if we replace "Euclidean domain" with "PID", and false if we replace it with "UFD", so there is no clear intuition to be gained from similar concepts. My first attempts at a proof was to borrow a construction from analysis and define a norm on $R/I$ by  $N(a + I) = \inf\{N(a+i) : i\in I\}$  but this didn't really get me anywhere.   So, this fact true? If so, how can I prove it? If not, whats a counterexample? Why am I still getting a password prompt with ssh with public key authentication? I'm working from the URL I found here:    My ssh client is Ubuntu 64 bit 11.10 desktop and my server is Centos 6.2 64 bit. I have followed the directions. I still get a password prompt on ssh.  I'm not sure what to do next. If we had an airtight container that was large enough, say extended out to the Karman line, would there still be a pressure gradient? If we assume that the pressure at the bottom was $1\ \mathrm{atm}$, would it have the same exact pressure gradient at 6 miles up on the outside? This is assuming that the gravity is still $9.8\ \mathrm{m/s^2}$. Difference between declaring variables before or in loop? I have always wondered if, in general, declaring a throw-away variable before a loop, as opposed to repeatedly inside the loop, makes any (performance) difference?  A (quite pointless) example in Java:  a) declaration before loop:  double intermediateResult; for(int i=0; i &lt; 1000; i++){     intermediateResult = i;     System.out.println(intermediateResult); }   b) declaration (repeatedly) inside loop:  for(int i=0; i &lt; 1000; i++){     double intermediateResult = i;     System.out.println(intermediateResult); }   Which one is better, a or b?   I suspect that repeated variable declaration (example b) creates more overhead in theory, but that compilers are smart enough so that it doesn't matter. Example b has the advantage of being more compact and limiting the scope of the variable to where it is used. Still, I tend to code according example a.  Edit: I am especially interested in the Java case. Material setings in properties window is missing Can spells with movable areas of effect be moved out of sight or behind obstacles? With spells like Moonbeam or Flaming Sphere, how should we treat the movement of their areas-of-effect when it comes to passing them behind a thick pillar or around a blind corner?  Should we treat any movement of them as if they are being 're-cast' (and so requiring a clear unobstructed view)? Or could a mage presumably will them somewhere out-of-sight?