How do I get a Nautilus shortcut to open on top of everything? I've made a nautilus short cut for almost all of my common folders. But when I press the keys to use the shortcut the folder do open, but they only open in the background. I still have to make a few clicks to see them infront of me.  I want to configure my shortcuts so the nautilus folders show up on top of everything. How can I do that?   Currently I am only using the basic System Settings keyboard shortcut function.
Keyboard shortcut/command for opening a new nautilus window and raise it What is the shortcut for opening a new window (opening folders). for that I have to go to folder options and right click and then need to click on open new window.  or I have to make focus on the folder icon or open a folder then press  Ctrl+N  for opening a new window is there any direct command spcific to open a new window in ubuntu.
I'm trying to prove the following statements in Folland's book.  Let $(X,\mathcal{M},\mu)$ be a measure space. If $f_n\to f$ in measure and $g_n\to g$ in measure, then $f_n+g_n\to f+g$ in measure and $f_ng_n\to fg$ in measure (in this last case, assume $\mu(X)&lt;\infty$).  The first one is already done, but the second one is giving me trouble.   My attempt: We can take subsequences $f_{n_k}$ and $g_{n_k}$ such that $f_{n_k}\to f$ a.e. and $g_{n_k}\to g$ a.e. In this case, we know that $f_{n_k}g_{n_k}\to fg$ a.e. Note that $\mu(X)&lt;\infty$, so we can use Egoroff's theorem to conclude that $f_{n_k}g_{n_k}\to fg$ almost uniformly. Finally, almost uniform convergence implies convergence in measure, therefore $f_{n_k}g_{n_k}\to fg$ in measure.   The problem is that I just have convergence in measure for some subsequence of $f_ng_n$ and I need convergence in measure for the whole sequence. Also I don't know if using Egoroff's theorem is unnecessary, if this is the case, I would appreciate to see some more elementary prove.  Detail: We say that $f_n\to f$ almost uniformly if for every $\varepsilon &gt; 0$ there is some $E\subset X$ measurable, such that $\mu(E) &lt;\varepsilon$ and $f_n\to f$ uniformly on $E^c$.  Thank you! Does magic jack work on Ubuntu? Does magic jack work with Ubuntu? I originally had my magic jack on a computer with windows XP and I decided to switch to Ubuntu but I still want Magic jack. Math mode accents In my long document I, sadly, have to use several accents to denote different kinds of symbols. Currently, I use primes ($x'$), hat, tilde, and overline. In addition I use two colored symbols (red colored tilde and blue $\prescript\ulcorner$), as I need further distinguishment.  Now I'd like to have no colors in my document, while I still have at least six different ways to differentiate certain symbols.  Which alternatives could I use that are easy to recognize and 'stand out', while they are different to prime/hat/tilde/overline?  EDIT: The reader should be able to see the kind of accent used even if the symbol in question is in a sub-script (possibly even a sub-sub-script). Lighter in CPU/Memory Usage: Lubuntu or Xubuntu I am looking for an Ubuntu version that consumes less Memory and CPU. I have read both Lubuntu and Xubuntu (The homepages, wikipedia, phoronix and other sites comparing both). But from experience, which one uses less memory and is less CPU intensive. I need to install them in very old hardware and want to persuade the owner of the hardware of the benefits of Ubuntu.  in this case I want to install 11.10 or 12.04 when it comes out. How are each behaving in those versions?  The 2 PCs I will be installing either Xubuntu or Lubuntu are:  Granpa PC:  CPU - Pentium 2 450Mhz RAM - 64MB DIMM Video - 16MB Used for - Documents and Internet. No listening to music, no looking at videos. Just using it for document writing.  The other old meat:  CPU - Pentium 3 550Mhz RAM - 128MB DIMM Video - 16MB Used for - Documents and Internet also but they want.. or maybe they are wishing for it to use it to see movies and listen to music. This one has internet. The other one does not.  UPDATE  Wanted to update this question with the test results for over 8 months worth of using Lubuntu and Xubuntu. When it comes to very old hardware, am talking about 64 MB, 128 MB or even 256 MB of RAM computers, Lubuntu is better than Xubuntu when comparing Memory usage. When it comes to CPU usage, both are the same.  This will not improve I/O Disk performance which will be the bottleneck for old computers. Also the difference in performance between Xubuntu and Lubuntu is about 10% to 20% percent in memory usage. Again, CPU usage is the same.  Now, when it comes to how responsive the Desktop is, LXDE (Lubuntu) has a much better response time than XFCE (Xubuntu). I would say about 50% or just simply noticeable to the eye. Lubuntu is similar to how Windows XP looks while Xubuntu is more like how Gnome 2 looked.  The computers (The old ones mentioned here) and 2 more are still working in excellent conditions thanks to the Ubuntu family. I also want to add I am using 13.10 for both distros. This hurts my eyes to read it and my ears to say it, but the writer stands by          About the same number of people was awarded bachelor's degrees in 2010 as filed for personal bankruptcy (1.6 million).   Is the subject in this sentence singular or plural? According to two questions  and  asked on this site earlier there exists a nice relation:  $$\frac1{n!} \left(\int_{0}^t\mathrm dt \; f(t)\right)^n = \int_{0}^t\mathrm dt_1 \int_{0}^{t_1}\mathrm dt_2 \cdots \int_{0}^{t_{n-1}}\mathrm dt_n\; f(t_1)\,f(t_2) \ldots f(t_n). $$  Unfrotunatly I am more interested in integrals of the form  $$\int_{0}^t\mathrm dt_1 \int_{0}^{t_1}\mathrm dt_2 \cdots \int_{0}^{t_{n-1}}\mathrm dt_n\; f(t_n). $$  Can it be somehow brought to an unary integral?  All I have figured out by now is that  $$\int_{0}^t\mathrm dt_1 \int_{0}^{t_1}\mathrm dt_2 \cdots \int_{0}^{t_{n-1}}\mathrm dt_n\; t_n^m = \frac{m!}{(m+n)!} t^{m+n} .$$ How can I easily encrypt a file? Link to the recommended job is broken in the mobile apps Interaction of Invoke Duplicity and Misty Step Unhandled event loop exception in plugin org.eclipse.ui What does NOEXEC flag mean when mounting directories on RHEL? I am trying to understand the NOEXEC flag when mounting.  I am having an execution issue within the /tmp directory on someone elses machine that I cannot access atm where the /tmp directory is mounted onto a different drive than '/' and NOEXEC is present.  I wanted to try and recreate this scenario on my machine, but I do not have a second hard drive.  I tried doing the following command:  mount --bind /test1 /test2   I then removed the bind flag and added NOEXEC in /etc/fstab.  Then, I created a file in /test2 called test.sh where it just echos 'hello world'.  I try and run it and it said 'permission denied'.  I then ran chmod 777 test.sh and was able to execute the file just fine.  I thought that the NOEXEC flag should not allow me to execute anything?  Is mount --bind /test1 /test2 not the same as mounting from a completely different physical drive? As in /test1 and /test2 are on different drives? My chooser (file-picker dialog) goes under the dock so I can't see buttons. What can I do? How to get Saudi Arabian transit visa for road travel? How do that charge gets transferred while rubbing? Rescuing/Compiling old TeX file starting with “\input amstex” tl;dr : For SEO, should I redirect from one to the other or list both on the DNS records?    It seems that most experts think that both www and non-www should exist. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.) And Google Webmasters Tools lets you choose which is the main one.  But: will a redirect give all SEO weight to one of them instead of splitting it? (There are other search engines after all, so setting the main one in Google Webmasters Tools might not be enough.) Will having both on the DNS records give them more importance? No difference? Mail App keeps popping up in the background in Mac OS Mojave I can't see my background image in the 3D view I try to set up an image as background for a basic blender tutorial, but it isn't visible.  This is the image I try to have as background: Why doesn't Zorn's lemma apply to $[0,1)$? What is the intuitive meaning of line integral with respect to x? I know how the line integral is calculated, but I want to know what the meaning of line integral with respect to x is, I mean, intuitively. The integral is $\int_C f(x,y) dx$ or it can be $\int_C f(x,y) dy$. ($C$ is a curve here) Thanks.