I applied the subdivision modifier a while ago. But Blender can't take it anymore I really need to undo it! I already start over a bit with the project but I really do not feel like making the wings all over again and the hair....can someone help me?
I am wondering if there is a modifier or tool that will essentially undo a subsurf or subdivide command.
Does increasing voltage increase the torque of a brushless motor? 1.) I have a brushless motor with testing data at 12V. I want to know if I increase the voltage supply, will this increase the torque?   In my research I keep seeing "current controls torque, and voltage controls speed." But that doesn't seem quite right. Let's say I have a theoretical electrically powered unicycle that is weighted. With a 5V source and 2A, the motor can't move the unicycle. But now I increase the voltage to 10V, and I believe current will also increase by x2 if resistance is constant (V = IR). So now the torque increases and the unicycle can move itself. It that a reasonable sequence of events? Can I say that increasing voltage increases torque?   2.) A similar question: if P = VI = tau*omega, then P/omega = tau, so:  2*(P/omega) = 2*tau, which means increasing power will increase torque, correct? And since P = VI, increasing V will increase P, which will in turn increase torque. Is this accurate at all? Any way to change my review of suggested edit? I goofed and rejected a suggested edit, a vote that was actually directed at the previous edit that I was reviewing. As this is unfair to the user who posted the suggested edit in question, is there any way in which to change/cancel my reject? How to use PSTricks in pdfLaTeX? I thought that PSTricks package was not possible to use in pdfLaTeX but .   How can I force pdfLaTeX to use PSTricks then? What exactly is a kilogram-meter? This question isn't just about kilogram-meters, it's about multiplied units in general.  I have a good mental conception of divided units, e.g. meters per second or grams per cubic meter.  Meters per second just (usually) means how many meters are traversed by an object each second.  Simple.  But I don't really have a mental conception of what it means when units are multiplied, e.g. a kilogram-meter.  Can anyone explain in simple physical terms what a kilogram-meter is? Print leading zeros with C++ output operator? What canonical momenta are the "right" ones? I'm doing some classical field theory exercises with the Lagrangian $$\mathscr{L} = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu \nu}F^{\mu \nu}$$ where $F_{\mu \nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu$. To find the conjugate momenta $\pi^\mu_{\ \ \ \nu} = \partial \mathscr{L} / \partial(\partial_\mu A^\nu)$, I can use two methods.  First method: directly apply this to $\mathscr{L}$. We get a a factor of $2$ since there are two $F$'s, and another factor of $2$ since each $F$ contains two $\partial_\mu A_\nu$ terms, giving $$\pi^\mu_{\ \ \ \nu} = -F^\mu_{\ \ \ \nu}.$$  Second method: get $\mathscr{L}$ in terms of $A$ by expanding and integrating by parts, yielding $$\mathscr{L} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu A^\mu)^2 - \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu A^\nu)^2.$$ Differentiating this gets factors of $2$ and gives $$\pi^\mu_{\ \ \ \nu} = \partial_\rho A^\rho \delta^\mu_\nu - \partial^\mu A_\nu.$$  These two answers are different! (They do give the same equations of motion, at least.) I guess that means doing the integration by parts changed the canonical momenta.  Is this something I should be worried about? In particular, I have another exercise that wants me to show that one of the canonical momenta vanishes -- this isn't true for the ones I get from the second method! Plus, my stress-energy tensor is changed too. When a problem asks for "the" canonical momenta, am I forbidden from integrating by parts? I need to show that $\sqrt{2}$, $\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}$, $\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}},\ldots$ converges and find the limit.   I started by defining the sequence by $x_1=\sqrt{2}$ and then $x_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+x_n}$. Then I proved by induction that the sequence is increasing and that it is bounded. Then I use the Monotone Convergence Theorem to prove that it converges.  Now, I claim that the limit of the sequence is $2$. So I need to show that for all $\epsilon&gt;0$, there exists $N$ such that for all $n\geq N$ we have $|x_n-2| &lt; \epsilon$. This is kind of where I'm stuck. I don't know how to proceed to prove the convergence to $2$. Importing shapefile into AutoCAD Map 3D? I'm trying to import shapefiles into a DWG using diferent layers names and during my web search I found this post. I know you did this 2 years ago but my problem is very similar and I wonder if you could help me.  Basically I've got a shapefiles of pipelines and I want to use the attribute name to sort the features into different CAD levels in teh same layer. I tried the import and although soem people say that "you can set the import to use data field" I can't see any option to do it and I'm really struggling. Any help appreciated.  I'm running on AutoCAD Map 3D 2010. I'm looking into running a machine-learning project on EL&amp;U to detect low-quality posts. To do that, I need a large dataset - and to get that, I need to get the text from a large number of deleted questions.   I can't use the API; deleted posts aren't included in it. I can't use SEDE: the PostsWithDeleted table lists NULL for the Body field of deleted posts. I can't script it: not only do I have insufficient reputation on EL&amp;U, but I also managed to get myself rate-limit-blocked while testing a script on Hardware Recs.   So, how else can I get this data? $A \subseteq \mathcal{R}(N)$ and given that (by inductive definition):   $N ∈ S$. If $a \in R$, then $R \setminus \{a\} \in A$.    I need to prove that for each $A \in S$, $N\setminus A$ is finite. How can I prove this formally? I use  to store all articles I need and bibtex4word add-on (in MS Word) to maintain the reference list. So, I would like to know how to properly fill the "author" field in Jabref with multiple authors to appear them correct in the reference list.  For example, I've got the article with several authors:      E. Orti, J.L. Bredas, C. Clarisse   And I would like them to appear in this manner. But instead I get this:     C. C. E. Orti, J. L. Bredas What does the Y capacitor in a SMPS do? An excited electron loses energy in the form of radiation. The radiation constitutes photons which move at a speed $c$. But is the process of conversion of the energy of the electron into the kinetic energy of the photon instantaneous? Is there a a simple way to visualize this process rather than math? I think it would be cool if a question would eventually open up to moderators to accept answers on the user's behalf, once a time period has passed. The asking user would get the rep score for the accept.  I know I've seen questions successfully answered with lots of upvotes and no accepted answer that sit there for months unaccepted. This would give superusers a little more functionality and would tie up a lot of loose ends.  What do you think? Windows does not mount USB NTFS superfloppy I have a Transcend Storejet external USB hard disk. This is not an SSD, but a mechanical disk with rotating plates. I have formatted the whole disk, without partitioning, as NTFS. I have used mkntfs tool under Linux.  When plugged into a Linux machine, the system sees a drive with two partitions (/dev/sdc /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdc2). However, as I know it is a partitionless disk, I can mount the whole device (mount -t ntfs /dev/sdc /mnt) and it works without any problems.  When plugged into a MS Windows XP machine, the systems sees a disk with two unformatted partitions, and it does not assign a drive letter to either the whole disk, nor to any of the partitions.  Would anyone know how to get MS Windows to mount my disk as a NTFS superfloppy?  I have already tried removing old USB mounting points and residual devices using 'DriveCleanup'. It did not help.  By the way, I also have an external Kingston USB SSD, also formatted as NTFS superfloppy, without partitioning. However, this one is recognized and mounted normally by MS Windows. How do you compute the earth's radius at a given geodetic latitude? The following code best describes the situation.  Why is the last line not outputting the trailing newline char?  Each line's output is shown in the comment.  I'm using GNU bash, version 4.1.5          echo -n $'a\nb\n'                  | xxd -p  # 610a620a              x=$'a\nb\n'   ; echo -n "$x" | xxd -p  # 610a620a      echo -ne "a\nb\n"                  | xxd -p  # 610a620a x="$(echo -ne "a\nb\n")" ; echo -n "$x" | xxd -p  # 610a62 How can I vertically align entries in my acronyms' list? I use the Glossaries package to generate it. Here is MWE:  % !TeX program = xelatex % !TeX encoding = utf-8 % !TeX spellcheck = ru_RU  \documentclass[12pt, a4paper]{article}  \usepackage{polyglossia} \setdefaultlanguage{russian} \setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]{Times New Roman}  \usepackage[xindy={glsnumbers=false}, nonumberlist, nopostdot, nogroupskip]{glossaries} %\setglossarystyle{super} % uncomment for style "super" \makeglossaries  \begin{document}  \newacronym{bam}{ДАП}{Двунаправленная Ассоциативная Память} \newacronym{ai}{ИИ}{Искусственный Интеллект} \newacronym{am}{АП}{Ассоциативная Память} \newacronym{ann}{ИНС}{Искусственная Нейронная Сеть} \newacronym{an}{ИН}{Искусственный Нейрон} \newacronym{it}{ИТ}{Информационные Технологии} \glsaddall  \printglossaries  \end{document}   With the default style I have the following:  As you can see, the long names are not vertically aligned. What I want can be achieved with the    \setglossarystyle{super}   But it this case, short names lose the BOLDness, some small horizontal indent appears and the spacing between lines becomes smaller:  where RED is some extra indent, which I don't need. Thank you for your answers! How to make traces on an universal PCB? I hope this question won't be closed as too subjective. I'd like to know best practice - how to make traces on universal PCB's with individual holes without traces (like the following image). My idea is to bend the ends of discrete components and use them to make traces to other components. Is this approach acceptable, or nasty? Although this is called "prototype" PCB, I'd like to use it for my simple final circuits (low frequency, low current applications), because I hope it will save time. Find the limit of $\log\Big(\frac{(n^2+n)!}{n^2!n^{2n}}\Big)$ I have to prove that      $$\Big[\log\Big(1+\frac 1{n^2}\Big)+ \log\Big(1+\frac 2{n^2}\Big)+...+ \log\Big(1+\frac n{n^2}\Big)\Big] \to \frac 12$$   I know that $$\log\Big(1+\frac 1{n^2}\Big)+ \log\Big(1+\frac 2{n^2}\Big)+...+ \log\Big(1+\frac n{n^2}\Big)= \\ =\log\Big(\frac {n^2+1}{n^2}\Big)+ \log\Big(\frac {n^2+2}{n^2}\Big)+...+ \log\Big(\frac {n^2+n}{n^2}\Big)=\\ =\log\Big(n^2+1\Big)+ \log\Big(n^2+2\Big)+...+ \log\Big(n^2+n\Big)-2n\log n$$  Doing some manipulation we get:           $$\lim_{n \to +\infty}\log\Big(\frac{(n^2+n)!}{n^2!n^{2n}}\Big)=\frac 12$$      How can I prove this limit?