I can't allocate more than Xms1G into Minecraft. I've looked at every tutorial and still, I can not allocate more. I have 8gb of ram and a 64-bit operating system. How can I allocate more? I've tried putting Xmx-4G but it crashes and says something about my Java Virtual Machine.
There is a lot of lag when I play Minecraft. I think this is due to the low amount of RAM I've allocated to Minecraft. (495MB)  How do you allocate more RAM to Minecraft?  I checked my other computer (Intel i5 Core) and it had the same amount of RAM allocated to Minecraft. However, Minecraft did not lag on that computer.  After I installed Optifine on this computer, the lag stopped (I don't know why cause I read that Optifine splits the load onto 2 cores, but I have only one core (At least I think so, a sticker on the laptop says Intel CORE i7)).
Reclassifying only part of raster keeping rest unchanged? I'm trying to reclassify only a certain part of a raster...not the entire raster.  Here's the problem.  I have a LULC raster of the entire US.  There are some issues with the raster that I want to fix, namely some cells that should be water are classified as wetlands.  These are mainly off the coast, not inland.  However, some cells that are classified as wetlands should really be wetlands (mainly inland) and I don't want these to change.  I plan on using a ZIP Code boundary file to determine which cells are considered "off the coast" and which ones are not.  I have access to ArcGIS 10.1 and R with the appropriate raster packages I need so a solution in either software would be fine.  Can anyone help me figure this out? Is logical implication always determinable from just the given statements? I am reading introductory texts on logic and am having a hard time understanding intuitively logical implication.  Specifically, I am wondering if logical implication can always be determined by two statements, P and Q alone? I'll try to give an example to clarify my question.  For example if the statement P is $x = 2$, and the statement Q is $x^2 &lt; 6$, then determining the truth of P $\Rightarrow$ Q is fairly straightforward:   If $x$ does equal 2, then $4&lt;6$ and Q is true, so $P \Rightarrow Q$ is true. And if $x$ does not equal 2, $P \Rightarrow Q$ is vacuously true.  In this example, with two statements P and Q, I can evaluate the truth/falsity of the statement P implies Q. However, what if the statement Q is changed such that it is now the statement $y = 5$?  So now I am trying to prove from that $$x = 2 \Rightarrow y = 5$$  Here is where things get murky for me. Say $x$ is not equal to 2, then $P \Rightarrow Q$ is vacuously true. But what about when $x$ does equal 2, now the statement Q could be true, but it could also be false, depending on some 'context'.   For example, if I said at the start: "Here are two statements, P and Q. Know that x = 2 and y = 4." Given this 'context', $P \Rightarrow Q$ is false. But if I say "Here are two statements, P and Q. Know that x = 2 and y = 5", then now $P \Rightarrow Q$ is true.  My discomfort here is that I assumed with two statements P and Q, I can determine the truth/falsity of $P \Rightarrow Q$ with just this information. Is this the wrong assumption?  As a secondary question, how can the truthfulness of the statement $P \Rightarrow Q$ be variable, depending on context? I have read on some other questions that implication can be interpreted as a promise. So how could it be that depending on some context the promise is sometimes true but sometimes false? Wouldn't this actually mean the promise is not always consistent and is therefore always false?  Some further information in case it is relevant, I recognise that in the first example, the statement Q is 'dependent' in some way on the statement P, since the object under examination in both statements is $x$, whereas in the second example there are two different objects which I am trying to make a logical connection between, which I am thinking may not be valid for some reason. I also recognise that there is still 'context' in the first example, in that we need information on whether $x$ is equal to 2 or not, however in that case it doesn't matter, since $P \Rightarrow Q$ is always true anyway.  Thanks very much in advance. Do you need line of sight to cast spells on someone? Iterating each character in a string using Python Does iCloud Two-factor authentication send a code to the same device as a log in request? My Apple-ID (e.g., on  ) is set up to require entry of a 6-digit code sent to my registered Apple products.  This code is being sent to the same device I'm currently requesting to log in. I feel this absolutely defeats the purpose of this 2-Factor Authentication: If a person knows my password, this person can receive the code on that device, and access my apple account without any problems.  Is this a bug or can I set up / change how this security step works? I'm trying to get:  document.createElement('div')  //=&gt; true {tagName: 'foobar something'}  //=&gt; false   In my own scripts, I used to just use this since I never needed tagName as a property:  if (!object.tagName) throw ...;   So for the second object, I came up with the following as a quick solution -- which mostly works. ;)  The problem is, it depends on browsers enforcing read-only properties, which not all do.  function isDOM(obj) {   var tag = obj.tagName;   try {     obj.tagName = '';  // Read-only for DOM, should throw exception     obj.tagName = tag; // Restore for normal objects     return false;   } catch (e) {     return true;   } }   Is there a good substitute? Find the tangent lines to the graph of $x^2+4y^2 = 36$ that go through the point $P=(12,3)$ I was solving a few problems from a textbook and I came across this one:     Find the tangent lines to the graph of $x^2+4y^2 = 36$ that go through   the point $P=(12,3)$   I could find the tangency points $$ but my solution was completely messy (I had four equations that I had to go back-and-forth with.  Is there an elegant/simple solution to that?  Tangency points:  $$P_1 = (0,3)$$ $$P_2 = \left( \frac{24}{5} , 3-\frac{24}{5} \right)$$ I'm close to maxing out my character and I want to beat Ganon solely for the TRUE ending, but I'm too scared of losing some of my personal favorites from the Guardian Spear++ to fighting those damned Guardians (it was so fun).  So, after beating Ganon    Do monsters disappear? - Including the corrupted Guardians, but also the blood moons, I don't want to just face off against the Yiga Clan... Am I gonna run out of resources? - As a survival game Zelda BOTW has some emphasis on the survival genre but to me it is a survival-esque action-adventure game. Are special weapons still available when you max out? - Like the Savage Lynel Spears or Swords) What's the difference between iterating over a file with foreach or while in Perl? Apple Magic Trackpad multitouch configuration How to apply for a UK standard visitor visa as a family? Why, logically, is proof by contradiction valid? How do I print all lines of a file with duplicate values in a certain column Given a file like this:  1,768,12,46576457,7898 1,123,435,134,146 2,345,6756856,12312,1311 5,234,567465,12341,1341 1,3245,4356345,2442,13 9,423,2342,121,463 9,989,342,121,1212   I would like to list all rows (in bash terminal) such that the value in column 1 appears at least twice (in column 1). The result should be  1,768,12,46576457,7898 1,123,435,134,146 1,3245,4356345,2442,13 9,423,2342,121,463 9,989,342,121,1212 $A_n$ is the only subgroup of $S_n$ of index $2$. How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?  Why isn't there other possibility?  Thanks :) I don't understand philosophy very well, and so I am wondering whether you can "prove" anything in philosophy. It always seems you can go a layer down, and find another question, almost endlessly until you get to the question of "why/how/are we here?"  Can you prove, absolutely, and 100% that something is true, in the field of philosophy? Create WiFi hotspot on ubuntu Although many questions have already been asked regarding WiFi hotspot, I didn't get any of the solutions working for me.  I connect to the Internet using a 3G Dongle of Huawei 3772 (Vodafone). The connection type is Mobile Broadband connection. I have to share this Internet connection with my other devices like mobile phones and laptops.  How can I create a WiFi hotspot connection for this connection.  I am using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.  I would like to note that I have already tried some help links from Ubuntu but, they are so confusing that I could not understand them. Gay rights – does Star Trek ever address this issue? I am aware of the picture of the man wearing the 'dress' from TNG, which promotes gender equality, but are gay rights ever addressed in Star Trek at all? (All seasons accepted.) How to define a bijection between $(0,1)$ and $(0,1]$? Consider the following figure from Faraway's Linear Models with R (2005, p. 59).    The first plot seems to indicate that the residuals and the fitted values are uncorrelated, as they should be in a homoscedastic linear model with normally distributed errors. Therefore, the second and third plots, which seem to indicate dependency between the residuals and the fitted values, suggest a different model.  But why does the second plot suggest, as Faraway notes, a heteroscedastic linear model, while the third plot suggest a non-linear model?  The second plot seems to indicate that the absolute value of the residuals is strongly positively correlated with the fitted values, whereas no such trend is evident in the third plot. So if it were the case that, theoretically speaking, in a heteroscedastic linear model with normally distributed errors  $$ \mbox{Cor}\left(\mathbf{e},\hat{\mathbf{y}}\right) = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1 &amp; \cdots &amp; 1 \\ \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots \\ 1 &amp; \cdots &amp; 1\end{array}\right] $$  (where the expression on the left is the variance-covariance matrix between the residuals and the fitted values) this would explain why the second and third plots agree with Faraway's interpretations.  But is this the case? If not, how else can Faraway's interpretations of the second and third plots be justified? Also, why does the third plot necessarily indicate non-linearity? Isn't it possible that it is linear, but that the errors are either not normally distributed, or else that they are normally distributed, but do not center around zero? I am planning a trip to Italy this coming January. My plan is to land by plane in Roma and then go to France by train/bus stopping in some Northern Italian cities on the way, enjoying the architecture, the atmosphere, the art and and the food.   I want to do it at my own pace, without heavy scheduling. Ideally, I would just decide which cities to visit, and take a train whenever I feel it. I often do this here in South Korea where I am living, taking advantage of the "standing seats" as it is called here, that is travelling (for a cheap price and no reservation) standing on the romm between two cars. From my experience, it is also doable in Taiwan (at least in some trains).  In France, regional trains usually does not need any reservation, so you can buy a ticket and take the train whenever you want.  Can I expect a similar system in Italy, that is a way to make short travels between close cities without reservation?   Example of "short travel": Pisa - Firenze.