If you go to the Hateno village lab early. You will find out about the upgrades to your Sheikah slate's functions.  You can upgrade your scanner to scan for other things than Shrines by proximity.  I used the feature to scan for some nearly worthless weapon (rusty broadsword). I scanned for other things earlier but I used this one to not make it ping everywhere like it would have with Hylian Mushroom.  I don't see a way to "clear" the targeted item from scanner+ so it can scan only for shrines.  Is there a way to clear your scanner+ targeted item?  To be clear I am NOT asking to turn off the indicator only change it back to search only for shrine and nothing else. Which is not a duplicate of the other question.
The shrine indicator (shrine detector? GPShrine?) has both visual and audio cues, so when I'm near a shrine, it beeps constantly. Unfortunately, I occasionally play the game near other humans who are engaged in their own activities, and my wife is decidedly unimpressed with this feature.   When I got the shrine indicator, I could have sworn that the dialogue said I could press [Y] to disable it... but pressing Y pulls out my weapon.   Ideally, I'd like to just make it stop beeping, but stay on for visual cues. But I'll settle for being able to turn it off entirely at times.
\varepsilon vs. \epsilon What is the smallest (installed size) ubuntu based distribution? For ridiculously small hard drives (8GB), what Ubuntu Based (although not necessarily official) distribution offers the smallest installed size?  Let me clarify: I still want a certain amount of personal file space, preferably a few gig. I also don't have a problem with performance, while it is mediocre, a 2.6GHz single-core and 1GB of ram suffice to run ubuntu fine, but i find that it  uses 6-7GB of space. I am aiming for closer to 4GB. I have a problem with arscalssica style in combination with classicthesis.  The text under the chapter title starts always at the same position, independently on how long is the chapter title, which produce this ugly behaviour:   The code I used to generete this output is really basic:  \documentclass[10pt,a4paper,twoside,openright,titlepage,fleqn,headinclude,footinclude,BCOR5mm,numbers=noenddot,cleardoublepage=empty,tablecaptionabove]{scrreprt} \usepackage{subfig} \usepackage[eulerchapternumbers,subfig,beramono,eulermath,pdfspacing]{classicthesis}  \usepackage{arsclassica}  \usepackage{blindtext}  \begin{document}     \chapter{\blindtext}     \blindtext \end{document}   The compilation raises the following warnings:  C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\koma-script\scrreprt.cls: Class scrreprt Warning: You've used obsolete option `tablecaptionabove'. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\classicthesis\classicthesis.sty: Class scrreprt Warning: Usage of package `titlesec' together(scrreprt)              with a KOMA-Script class is not recommended. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\titlesec\titlesec.sty: Package titlesec Warning: Non standard sectioning command detected(titlesec)                Using default spacing and no format. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\titlesec\titlesec.sty: Package titlesec Warning: Non standard sectioning command detected(titlesec)                Using default spacing and no format. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\titlesec\titlesec.sty: Package titlesec Warning: Non standard sectioning command detected(titlesec)                Using default spacing and no format. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\titlesec\titlesec.sty: Package titlesec Warning: Non standard sectioning command detected(titlesec)                Using default spacing and no format. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\titlesec\titlesec.sty: Package titlesec Warning: Non standard sectioning command detected(titlesec)                Using default spacing and no format. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\classicthesis\classicthesis.sty:373: Package scrreprt Warning: Activating an ugly workaround for a missing(scrreprt)                feature of package `titlesec` on input line 373. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\arsclassica\arsclassica.sty:192: Package hyperref Warning: Option `hyperfootnotes' has already been used,(hyperref)                setting the option has no effect on input line 192. C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\arsclassica\arsclassica.sty:192: Package hyperref Warning: Option `pdfpagelabels' has already been used,(hyperref)                setting the option has no effect on input line 192   The behaviour is ok if I do not use arsclassica but only classicthesis: I remember reading ages ago that it's a good idea to choose either www.example.com or domainexamplecom as your main URL and then set the other one as a 301 redirect to point to your domain? The reason provided was:  Some people may link to www.example.com Other links may point to example.com  In order to not lose 'SEO link juice', the individual recommended setting up a 301 redirect from one to the other. Has this changed? Is it true? I would have guessed that Google (and other search engines) would be smart enough to whack some code in their algorithm to understand that in most cases www.example.com = example.com? The definite and zero article with the word "civilization" How does damage dealt increase as you level up I've recently taken over as GM in my group.  We are all new to RPGs except for our original GM, so they decided to run an adventure path so it would be easier to change GMs if they had to stop playing.  Along this path, we had one CR 4 encounter that took us an hour, almost killed our bloodrager and knocked our brawler unconscious. When we leveled up, our GM told us to increase the damage we did by "one level," so my 1d6 became 2d6 and my friend's 2d6 became 4d6.  I saw no problem with this as a player, but I was looking over the adventure path and later encounters that also have a CR of 4 could be ended in one turn by our bloodrager. This would make encounters really boring, and my goal is to avoid boredom.  My question is: As you level up, how does the damage you do increase? Does it go up like my GM said so that at level 3 my rapier does 3d6 and the bloodrager's earth breaker does 6d6, or does it go up by some other method?  I have read the PHB and I don't think that what the GM was saying is correct, but being a first-time player I wasn't sure if had just missed something, so I figured I should ask elsewhere. How do I deal with a compromised server? Pivot in SQL 2008 R2 Accented letters with IM FELL fonts I am having an error compiling the following code with xelatex and lualatex:  ** WARNING ** "seac" character deprecated in Type 2 charstring. ** ERROR ** Type2 Charstring Parser: Parsing charstring failed: (status=-1, stack=5)  Output file removed.  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{xunicode} \usepackage{fontspec}  \setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text,Ligatures={Common}, Numbers={OldStyle}]{IM FELL English PRO} \begin{document}  Buongiorno a tutti. Trallallà.  \end{document}   The error disappears when I omit the accented à. It also doesn't happen when I use other fonts.  Could you suggest any workaround?  Thank you, A How do I change the extension of multiple files? When should "farther" and "further" be used? I loved the keyboard shortcuts in Windows 7 (i.e. Win + &larr; moves a window to the left side of the screen), but I'm not sure on what some of the new ones might be for Windows 8.  What are all of the NEW keyboard shortcuts that I can use while working in Windows 8? I was asked to evaluate the following sum: $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k}\int_{\pi k}^{\infty}\frac{\sin(x)}{x}dx$$  I'm trying to use $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x}dx=\frac{\pi}{2}$$ However, it doesn't seem to work. Any help is greatly appreciated. bash dynamic (variable) variable names Prove $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{(n-1)}{n}$ using induction. I need to prove $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{(n-1)}{n}$ using induction. I am getting stuck midway through the inductive step.   Here is what I have:  $\forall n\geq 2$, where $n\in\mathbb{N}, P(n)$ is the statement "$\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{(n-1)}{n}$".  Base case:  $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{2}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{1}{2}$ = $\frac{(2-1)}{2}$ so $P(2)$ is true.  Inductive assumption: Assume $P(n)$ is true. Need to show $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n+1}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{((n+1)-1)}{(n+1)}$.  $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ + $\frac{1}{n^{2}}$ = $\frac{(n-1)}{n}$ + $\frac{1}{n^{2}}$  = $\frac{n(n-1) + 1}{n^{2}}$ = $\frac{n^{2}-n+1}{n^{2}}$  I got stuck here and tried working backward from $\frac{((n+1)-1)}{(n+1)}$, which gives me:  $\frac{((n+1)-1)}{(n+1)}$ = $\frac{n}{(n+1)}$   Any suggestions on what to do next or where I may be going wrong? I am wondering if the mass density profile $\rho(\vec{r})$ has been characterized for atomic particles such as quarks and electrons. I am currently taking an intro class in quantum mechanics, and I have run this question by several professors. It is my understanding from the viewpoint of quantum physics a particle's position is given by a probability density function $\Psi(\vec{r},t)$. I also understand that when books quote the "radius" of an electron they are typically referring to some approximate range into which an electron is "likely" to fall, say, one standard deviation from the expectation value of its position or maybe $10^{-15}$ meters.  However it is my impression that, in this viewpoint, wherever the particle "is" or even whether or not the particle "had" any position to begin with (via the Bell Inequalities), it is assumed that if it were (somehow) found, it would be a point mass. This has been verified by my professors and GSIs. I am wondering if its really true.  If the particle was truly a point mass then wherever it is, it would presumably have an infinite mass density. Wouldn't that make electrons and quarks indistinguishable from very tiny black holes? Is there any practical difference between saying that subatomic particles are black holes and that they are point masses? I am aware of such problems as Hawking Radiation although at the scales of the Schwarchild radius of an electron (back of the envelope calculation yields $\tilde{}10^{-57}$ meters), would it really make any more sense to use quantum mechanics as opposed to general relativity?  If anyone knows of an upper bound on the volume over which an electron/quark/gluon/anything else is distributed I would be interested to know. A quick Google Search has yielded nothing but the "classical" electron radius, which is not what I am referring to.  Thanks in advance; look forward to the responses. Is it because Rey just saved BB-8 from a net, and then the droid just decides to follow her about - or is it for some other reason?  Does BB-8 have any idea who Rey is prior to being rescued by her?  Just wondering as she literally tells the droid to go elsewhere. Showing $\sum_{i = 1}^n\frac1{i(i+1)} = 1-\frac1{n+1}$ without induction? I oversaw a high-school mathematics test the other day, and one of the problems was the following     Show, using induction or other means, that $$\sum_{i = 1}^n\frac1{i(i+1)} = 1-\frac1{n+1}$$   The induction proof is very standard, where the induction step relies on the fact that $\frac{1}{n+1} + \frac{1}{n(n+1)} = \frac{1}{n}$, and I'm sure it's been answered on this site before. However, I got intrigued by the "or other means" part of the question.  I don't know whether the teacher who wrote the test even considered any alternative solutions (he may just have written it so that if anyone has a crazy idea that works out, then they should get a full score for it), but I tried to find one. For instance, we may do the following telescope-ish argument: $$ \frac{1}{1(1+1)} + \frac{1}{2(2+1)} + \cdots + \frac{1}{(n-1)n} + \frac{1}{n(n+1)} + \frac{1}{n+1}\\ = \frac{1}{1(1+1)} + \frac{1}{2(2+1)} + \cdots + \frac{1}{(n-1)n} + \frac1n\\ \vdots\\ = \frac{1}{1(1+1)} + \frac12\\ = 1 $$ However, I feel that this is just an induction proof in disguise (hidden in the vertical dots). If one uses the mechanics of the induction proof to check whether the formula is true for a specific $n$, then one certainly does the exact same calculations as I have done here.  Is there a proof of this fact that clearly does not use induction (or at least hides it better)? The more elementary the better, and the ultimate goal would be to do it within the syllabus of the students taking the test (or at least not far from it). For reference, they should be familiar with the summation formula of arithmetic and geometric series and their derivations (so techniques resembling those would be well within specifications).  If there is a solution using calculus, then the students should be able to integrate elementary trigonometric functions, as well as exponential functions, logarithms and rational functions. They are familiar with integration by parts, substitution and partial fractions.  I welcome more advanced solutions as well, of course. How to reinstall yum? Regard the diff equation:  $mϕ′′+aϕ′+(mg/L)ϕ=0$  $ϕ(0)=0.1$  $ϕ′(0)=0$  where $m=0.1,L=1,a=2,$  1) Rewrite the second order diff equation as a system of first order linear equations.  2) What is the matrix that comes from the rewritten equations?