How to handle an answer that only points to a resource? When I'm reviewing items I sometimes come across answers like this:     Here's what you are looking for: www.domain.com/resource.aspx   How should one handle these? By adding a comment?
Are answers that just contain links elsewhere really "good answers"? I have often wondered at the practice on Stack&nbsp;Overflow, Server&nbsp;Fault, and the other sites where someone will ask a question and an answer will come in that says Look here: http://link elsewhere. Rarely will the link have exactly the answer necessary -- often it's an entire article -- yet these answers get voted up.  Why is that, exactly? I realize this is subjective, but my own thoughts are that one should try and give the answer (even if the answer is 'no, it can't be done' or 'no, I don't think it can be done' -- very different answers) and then if you have a link that explains it, go ahead and post it within the answer.  What does the community think about this?     For more information, see  in the .
What kind of questions can I expect to see on a qualifying exam? What is duplicate content and how can I avoid being penalized for it on my site? Matryoshka words Since it's Friday and others are playing games, here's another one to take us into the weekend.  Everyone knows about those Russian nesting dolls (called matryoshka dolls, I believe). A small doll nests inside a larger, which itself is inside a larger doll, and so on.   This game does the same with words. You start with a three-letter word, add a letter to make another word, and so on. Longest word wins. The catch? Each additional letter has to form a legitimate word.  Here's one to start you off:     bur   burr   burro   burrow   burrows     Good luck. Problem of unbalanced data I've seen the phrase "sh compatible" used usually in reference to shells. I'm not sure if it also applies to the programs that might be run from within shells.  What does it mean for a shell or other program to be "sh compatible"? What would it mean to be "sh incompatible"?  Edit: This question asking the difference between bash and sh is very relevant:   I'd still like a direct answer to what it means to be "sh compatible". A reasonable expectation might be that "sh compatible" means "implements the Shell Command Language" but then why are there so many "sh compatible" shells and why are they different? Say I had;   \begin{equation}   \begin{cases}      x = 0 \\      y = 0 \\      z = 0     \end{cases}     \qquad \text{and} \qquad     \begin{cases}      x = a \\      y = a \\      z = b     \end{cases}   \end{equation}   How could I insert a brace ( } ) in the second 'cases' to say x and y are equal to a. (i.e. } = a ).   I hope this is clear, if not I can sketch it out - just let me know!  Thanks in advance! Can FFMPEG extract images from a video with timestamps? I just installed Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS after installing windows 10 in my new VN7-571G and the wireless is not working. It never had: even during the installation it was not recognized. I run a script to gather the data , which is . lspci -knn | grep Net -A2 output 03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros Device [168c:003e] (rev 20)         Subsystem: Lite-On Communications Inc Device [11ad:0804]  The OS behaves like it has no wifi card. I do not see wifi settings in network settings I'm not a linux power user, so I do not know what to do to solve the issue. What should I do to make it work? I have a block of text that I would like to automatically break in blocks of equal length. Something like what \num does with numbers.  What I need is a definition for what I called \makeBlocks. The MWE below should output: aaaaa bbbbb ccccc ddddd followed by abc def ghi  \documentclass{article}  \newcommand{\makeBlocks}[1]{???}  \begin{document} \makeBlocks{5}{aaaaabbbbbcccccddddd}  followed by \makeBlocks{3}{abcdefghi} \end{document} Expected value as a function of quantiles? I was wondering where there is a general formula to relate the expected value of a continuous random variable as a function of the quantiles of the same r.v. The expected value of r.v. $X$ is defined as: $E(X) = \int x dF_X(x) $ and quantiles are defined as :  $Q^p_X = \{x : F_X(x) = p \} =F_X^{-1}(p) $ for $p\in(0,1)$.  Is there for instance a function function $G$ such that:  $E(X) = \int_{p\in(0,1)} G(Q^p_X) dp $ Does $\sum \limits_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\sin n}{n}(1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n})$ converge (absolutely)? I've had no luck with this one. None of the convergence tests pop into mind.  I tried looking at it in this form $\sum \sin n\frac{1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}}{n}$ and apply Dirichlets test. I know that $\frac{1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}}{n} \to 0$ but not sure if it's decreasing.  Regarding absolute convergence, I tried:  $$|\sin n\frac{1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}}{n}|\geq \sin^2 n\frac{1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}}{n}=$$  $$=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}}{n}-\frac{1}{2}\cos 2n\frac{1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}}{n}$$  But again I'm stuck with $\cos 2n\frac{1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}}{n}$. Assuming it converges then I've shown that $\sum \sin n\frac{1+\frac{1}{2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}}{n}$ doesn't converge absolutely. I have successfully transferred "Killing Floor" from my brother's laptop to my own via external hard drive. The problem, now that I have all the files, is that I don't know how to launch the game through Steam. All I did was copy files from his Laptop to the hard drive, then from the hard drive to my laptop, then I put the files in the "Steamapps" folder under "Steam" in my laptops hard drive. So the question is, how do I start up the game through Steam? I have two user profile fields "Last Name" and "First Name". I also have a user list views. I want to expose "Name" as filter which can search for both Last Name and First Name. How can I do single filter of combination of those two fields? Can I create it from views UI?  One possible way is to create another profile field "Name" which will be hidden in the form. On user save, I would combine the two field values into the "Name" field and then expose it as filter in the views. But this solution is hard coding and it needs to write hooks. Why is part of my model not being rendered? Why is the selected object displaying in the 3D view, but not rendering?  In object mode, it shows up:   However, it does not show up in render mode:   Why is this so and what causes it to hide in render mode? A spaceship crew stuck in a damaged spaceship that's losing power Prove that $$1+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1\cdot 3}{3\cdot 6}+\frac{1\cdot 3\cdot 5}{3\cdot 6 \cdot 9}+.........=\sqrt{3}$$   $\bf{My\; Try::}$ Using Binomial expansion of  $$(1-x)^{-n} = 1+nx+\frac{n(n+1)}{2}x^2+\frac{n(n+1)(n+2)}{6}x^3+.......$$  So we get $$nx=\frac{1}{3}$$ and $$\frac{nx(nx+x)}{2}=\frac{1}{3}\cdot \frac{3}{6}$$  We get $$\frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{1}{3}+x\right)=\frac{1}{3}\Rightarrow x=\frac{2}{3}$$  So we get $$n=\frac{1}{2}$$  So our series sum is $$(1-x)^{-n} = \left(1-\frac{2}{3}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} = \sqrt{3}$$  Although I know that this is the simplest proof, can we solve it any other way someting like defining $a_{n}$ and then use Telescopic sum.  Thanks. Is using "fruits" as the plural of "fruit" acceptable? Possessive of a word that is already possessive If the cricket ground Lord's is a possessive, what if you want to describe something belonging to Lord's? Would you say:     I was very impressed by Lord's's customer services.   It doesn't look right, so what is the correct way of writing it? Simple way to monitor a multiple URLDownloadSubmit calls? Textbook approach to modeling non-proportional hazards in the Cox model In Cox models with time varying coefficients, the effect of covariates on the hazard is allowed to change through time. In cases where a coefficient has a linear relationship with time, I am aware of at least two text books ( and an Appendix to ) that advocate for the following model, first in R code:  coxph(Surv(time, death) ~ disease + disease:time)   And now in mathematical notation:  $$ h(t|X) = h_0(t) \exp(\beta_1X + \beta_2X_T) $$ Where $h(t|X)$ is the instantaneous hazard rate at time $t$ given covariates $X$; $h_0(t)$ is the baseline hazard rate; and $T$ is the censoring or event times. $\beta_1$ represents the log hazard ratio for individuals with $T=0$ (which is sort of nonsensical since you can't have $T=0$ in the data), while $\beta_2$ is harder to interpret... $\beta_2$ shows how the log hazard ratio depends on censoring/event times, but that is circular because event times are also the response variable (this point is made in Terry Therneau’s vignette “”).  According to Therneau's vignette, to correctly specify a time varying coefficient, you need to use the following model, first in R code:  coxph(Surv(time, death) ~ disease + tt(disease), tt=function(x,t,...){x*t})   And now in mathematical notation: $$ h(t|X) = h_0(t) \exp(\beta_1X + \beta_2X_T) $$  The difference is that the time interaction is with $t$ in the model rather than with the event times $T$ in the data. The resulting parameters are easy to interpret: they are the intercept and slope of the linear relationship between the log hazard ratio of $X$ and time. This approach seems like the proper way to model a time varying effect.  Can anyone justify or advocate for the first approach to modeling non-proportional hazards in the Cox model? If it is really incorrect (as I suspect it is), what are the practical consequences of using this approach?