I know that frustrated is usually paired with 'by'; however, in this case is does not sound right. Is the given phrase correct? If not, what would be an appropriate way to phrase it.  My sentence is structured like this:  "Frustrated of feeling mute, I decided to..."
What is the difference in meaning of "frustrated at" and "frustrated with" used in sentences like     He is frustrated with me   or      He is frustrated at me   When is each of these sentences above are used?
What is a word for "cannot-be-wrong" attitude? When speaking with someone recently I was continuously taken aback by how he could not concede even the slightest detail in my argument (which was not unreasonable), and it happened another time previously. Both times had to do with me pointing out 'error' in his action.  He very much exhibits that 'I cannot be wrong' attitude.  I first thought to call this arrogance or pride but he is not overbearing like arrogance demands and he does not show excessive self esteem that pride demands.  What is a word that can accurately describe this attitude? How to prove $a_1^m + a_2^m + \cdots + a_n^m \geq \frac{1}{a_1} + \frac{1}{a_2} + \cdots + \frac{1}{a_n}$ Proof that $\cos(\pi/3)=1/2$ Is it possible to prove that $\cos(\pi/3)=1/2$ without using any trigonometric identities?  To be specific, my calculus-book simply states that with an angle of $\pi/3$ on the unit-circle the points (0,0) and (1,0) are the vertices of an equilateral triangle with edge length 1. But how can one reach such conclusion?  Thanks! What makes a chewy brownie? I've tried many different brownie recipes and most of mine bake to a cake-like consistency. The brownie holy grail for me is crusty top chewy brownies. What can I add/remove/do that will make my brownies chewier? Show that $e^3 > 20$ Views indicator inaccurate, shows one views on question with two close votes Two close votes and only one person has viewed the question?    How did this happen? I have a project, and it has an object that has always rendered correctly, but one day when I open the project and make a test render, the object has disappeared. All the settings are normal, the object, and all of its children render display in the object outliner set to true. I really don't know what happened to it. Can someone tell me what I should look through to diagnose it? Sorry I cannot provide much detail. What I've explained is all I know. Edit: I am uploading the .blend file at  This is a Minecraft scene. It is the wolf that doesn't render. At one point it did, but now it just won't. The wolf has particle properties. I don't know if that matters, but it could. Look through all the wolf's properties to try and figure it out. LaTeX: optional arguments with square brackets LaTeX is trying to add a missing $ that I don't want to the following code. Minimal working example:  \documentclass[letter,12pt]{article}  \newcommand{\monkeyBeans}[2][]{   \parbox{4in}{#1} }  \begin{document}  \parbox{4in}{$[a, b]$}   \monkeyBeans[$[a, b]$]{yo monkey}  \end{document}   If I try any of the following lines in my document instead of the call to monkeyBeans, there is no error:  \parbox{4in}{$[a, b]$}  \monkeyBeans[yo monkey]{$[a, b]$} \monkeyBeans[$(a, b)$]{yo monkey} \monkeyBeans{$[a, b]$}{yo monkey}   What is the deal with square brackets in optional arguments? Difference between force.com and salesforce.com? What the difference between the two?  This description seems to be a bit out of date and underspecified. $X$ is a Hausdorff space and $\sim$ is an equivalence relation.  If the quotient map is open, then $X/{\sim}$ is a Hausdorff space if and only if $\sim$ is a closed subset of the product space $X \times X$.  Necessity is obvious, but I don't know how to prove the other side. That is, $\sim$ is a closed subset of the product space $X \times X$ $\Rightarrow$ $X/{\sim}$ is a Hausdorff space. Any advices and comments will be appreciated. How many Java string objects created in the code String s="abc"+"xyz";? Why does the variance of the Random walk increase? The bottom bracket of my bike was completely stripped to the point that when you push the left side crank arm, the right crank moves and you can see the bottom bracket lock move out the frame. The bike shop tried putting Teflon tape but it's temporary. It's a 26' xc hard tail. For all I know both sides of the bottom bracket(square tapered) are stripped clean hence the Teflon tape put by the previous owner. Can I fix the problem by changing into a hallow tech cranks because it works like a thread less bb, or should I just buy a thread less square tapered bb? Any suggestion on what to do? Draw a vector with mathematica I'm looking for a book that starts with the premise that (once the population size had exceeded a certain number) the future development of mankind (revolutions and wars in so and so many years, colonization of other planets in so and so many years, and so on) could be predicted completely by applied statistics. (IIRC, they used slide rules for those exact predictions, but that is certainly owed to the time the story was written). Next, the predictability was used to take a few tiny measures that would change mankind's fate in a favourable way. After a long time, the predictive system fails(?) because a mutation occurs in some person(s).  And now is the part where I'm not sure if it belongs to this or another story: The mutation results in the ability to "beam" by thinking of a place where one has been before... Closed form for $ \int_0^\infty {\frac{{{x^n}}}{{1 + {x^m}}}dx }$ I've been looking at  $$\int\limits_0^\infty  {\frac{{{x^n}}}{{1 + {x^m}}}dx }$$  It seems that it always evaluates in terms of $\sin X$ and $\pi$, where $X$ is to be determined. For example:  $$\displaystyle \int\limits_0^\infty  {\frac{{{x^1}}}{{1 + {x^3}}}dx = } \frac{\pi }{3}\frac{1}{{\sin \frac{\pi }{3}}} = \frac{{2\pi }}{{3\sqrt 3 }}$$  $$\int\limits_0^\infty  {\frac{{{x^1}}}{{1 + {x^4}}}dx = } \frac{\pi }{4}$$  $$\int\limits_0^\infty  {\frac{{{x^2}}}{{1 + {x^5}}}dx = } \frac{\pi }{5}\frac{1}{{\sin \frac{{2\pi }}{5}}}$$  So I guess there must be a closed form - the use of $\Gamma(x)\Gamma(1-x)$ first comess to my mind because of the $\dfrac{{\pi x}}{{\sin \pi x}}$ appearing. Note that the arguments are always the ratio of the exponents, like $\dfrac{1}{4}$, $\dfrac{1}{3}$ and $\dfrac{2}{5}$. Is there any way of finding it? I'll work on it and update with any ideas.    UPDATE:  The integral reduces to finding   $$\int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty  {\frac{{{e^{a t}}}}{{{e^t} + 1}}dt} $$  With $a =\dfrac{n+1}{m}$ which converges only if   $$0 &lt; a &lt; 1$$  Using series I find the solution is     $$\sum\limits_{k =  - \infty }^\infty  {\frac{{{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^k}}}{{a + k}}} $$ Are users notified when their questions are reopened? Do users get notified when their question is reopened? I know there are no notifications , and that makes sense because 1) you assume the user is paying attention to their open, unanswered question, and they'll probably notice it's been put on hold and 2) it follows with the SE policy of (in general) not sending notifications for negative events.  However a reopening is a good thing, and once a question is closed it becomes less likely that the OP will be coming back to check on it often (so they might not notice the reopening otherwise). If there are not reopen notifications, why not? Or can we add them? What books would you recommend to start learning about software testing I'm trying to learn more about software testing, so I want to know which books you would recommend on this topic I go to change my birthdate on Roblox, but nothing shows up, the dropdowns are just blank with no Month, Day or Year:  It also shows me a pop up asking to put in the Missing Details to improve the experience, but no matter how many times I put in my age it doesn't save and asks it again. Erlang server, Java client - TCP messages get split?