This is more of a curiosity then a real problem, I am just to lazy to reboot or log off my laptop.  I have connected to a network share on a Windows server with domain credentials from a non-domain Windows 7 machine, I didn't mark the option to remember the password.  The share is let's say \\10.10.10.10\folder.  I have changed the password for that domain account in the meantime, and now when I try to access that share I get the following error:     Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password   I have tried the following on the client side:   deleting cached credentials in Credential Manager running net use delete running net session \\ip.of.the.server /delete gives me "A session does not exist with that computer name." running net use \\10.10.10.10\folder /u:DOMAIN\USER password gives me "The command completed successfully.", but I still get the same unknown user name or bad password when trying to access the share from Windows Explorer mapping the share as a network drive from GUI, but then I get     The network folder specified is currently mapped using a different user name and password.   To connect using a different user name and password, first disconnect any existing mappings to this network share.  running net use to see connections, I get that there are no connections in the list killing explorer.exe and starting it again.   I have tried the following on the server side:   going to Computer Management > Shared folders > Sessions to kill the session with my username rebooting the server   I have managed to access the share using the domain name instead of the IP address, but I am curios.  Does anybody know any way how to delete the cached credentials in this case? Where are credentials cached when you don't mark the remember password option when accessing the share, they are not shown in Credential Manager and there is no mapping shown when you run net use.
I just tried to access a folder like so:  \\somecomputeronmynetwork\somelocation$   When going to this location I'm prompted for a user name and password.  I put one in, and it let me in fine.  Now I need to remove that login, so I can try a different user name and password.  What's the easiest way to do this?
Apple Macbook Dual Monitor MST I stumbled upon a question given like:  Let $m$ and $n$ be two integers such that $m \geq n \geq 1$.   Count the number of functions $$f: \{1, 2, · · · , n\} \to \{1, 2, · · · , m\}$$ of the following two types:  (a) strictly increasing; i.e., whenever $x &lt; y, f(x) &lt; f(y)$, and  (b) non-decreasing; i.e., whenever $x &lt; y, f(x) \leq f(y)$.  I tried in the following way.  For (a). We can say $f(n)&gt;f(n-1)$ AND $f(n)&gt;f(n-2) \ldots f(n)&gt;f(1)$ (total $n-1$ elements)  Similarly for $f(n-1)&gt;f(n-2), f(n-1)&gt;f(n-3) \ldots f(n-1)&gt;f(1)$ (total $n-2$ elements)...  and $f(2)&gt;1$  Like this $$(n-1) + (n-2) + \ldots + (1) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$$  Is this correct?  For (b). Since there's equality, it will be $$n + (n-1) + ... (1) = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$$  Is my approach correct? Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance. Standard library sort and user defined types As Joel points out in , in  (aka: K &amp; R), there is mention of this property of arrays in C: a[5] == 5[a]  Joel says that it's because of pointer arithmetic but I still don't understand. Why does a[5] == 5[a]? How to explain dropout regularization in simple terms? What's the difference between a shunt resistor and a four-terminal resistor? I want to know if the four-terminal resistor and the shunt resistor are the same.   Is there another use for the four-terminal resistor except measuring current? How can I replace a relay with a MOSFET Transistor? I have this working         &ndash; Schematic created using   An Arduino commute both relays and a power adapter charge each battery at a time.  I would like to replace each relay by a MOSFET. How can I do that?  I think the solution bellow will not work because DRAIN is always connected to SOURCE and this will short circuit batteries. MOSFETS only isolate from SOURCE to DRAIN.  When the D9 is HIGH, D10 will be LOW so the power adapter will never be charging both batteries simultaneously.          Sorry for the messy schematic.  Thank you very much. Proving $(\forall a\in\mathbb{Z^+})(m\in\mathbb{Z^+}\to a^m\equiv a^{m-\phi(m)}\pmod{m})$ Problem: $(\forall a\in\mathbb{Z^+})(m\in\mathbb{Z^+}\to a^m\equiv a^{m-\phi(m)}\pmod{m})$  My work: Start by letting $m=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}\cdots p_r^{a_r}$. If $(a,p_i)=1$ for some integer $i$, then we have that  $$ a^{\phi(p_i^{a_i})}\equiv 1\pmod{p_i^{a_i}} $$ by Euler's theorem. Since $\phi(p_i^{a_i}) \mid \phi(m)$, we have that $p_i^{a_i}\mid (a^{\phi(m)}-1)$ if $(a,p_i)=1$.   Beyond this, I am stuck at the moment. In a preadditive category, products are coproducts $\renewcommand{\phi}{\varphi}$ $\require{AMScd}$ My question is different from .  I want to see how in a preadditive category $\mathcal{C}$ a product is a coproduct, following . I'll write the proof up to the point where I get stuck.  Let $A=A_1,B=A_2$ be objects and suppose their product $P$ does exist, with projections $\pi_i:P\rightarrow A_i$. By considering a wedge  $$\begin{CD}A @&lt;{id_A}&lt;&lt;  A @&gt;{0_{AB}}&gt;&gt;  B\end{CD}$$  and the obvious analogous one with $A$ and $B$ exchanged, where $0_{A,B}$ is the zero morphism, we see that the product property implies the existence of two unique morphisms $k_i\in\mathcal{C}[A_i,P]$ s.t.  \begin{align*} \pi_j\circ k_i=\begin{cases} \mathrm{id}_i &amp;\text{if }i=j\\ 0_{A_i, A_j} &amp;\text{if }i\neq j \end{cases}. \end{align*} Using these equations and the definition of zero morphism, it's easy to see that the morphism $m\equiv k_1\circ \pi_1+ k_2\circ \pi_2$ satisfies $\pi_i\circ m=\pi_i$.   This is where I get stuck: In the linked proof, they now state that this implies $m=\mathrm{id}_P.$ But I don't see why this should be true.   Specifically, if $\phi\in\mathcal{C}[S,P]$ for some arbitrary object $S$, it is not apparent why $m\circ\phi=\phi$. All that we know is that there are some morphisms $x_i\in\mathcal{C}[S,A_i]$ that factor through $P$ via the universal property, but these are not necessarily unique.  And we learn even less about $m$ by looking at morphisms in $\mathcal{C}[P,S]$.  What am I missing here? Recurrence relation for right-angled triangles stuck-together Can there be a notification for those people that participated in the question in the past (either who asked or answered it) once a bounty is started on it? This example illustrates some conflict between xelatex and natbib- and footnote-generated superscripts.  The semi-colon between distinct citations is not typeset as a superscript, nor is the dagger.  The asterisk, however, looks fine to me.  Any suggestion on how to make these auto-generated superscripts look more normal?   Update Mostly fixed, see second screenshot below.  Update 2 Fully fixed!  Alter the MWE below with this code:  \DefineFNsymbols*{safestar}{{$*$}{\textdagger}{\textdaggerdbl}{\textsection} {\textparagraph}{\textbardbl}{$**$}{\textdagger\textdagger} {\textdaggerdbl\textdaggerdbl}{\textsection\textsection} {\textparagraph\textparagraph}{\textbardbl\textbardbl}} \setfnsymbol{safestar}   This comes  Achim Blumensath on the MinionPro mailing list, together with  for the footmisc package.  \documentclass[article, a4paper, 12pt, oneside]{memoir}  \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \usepackage{xltxtra} % c/o @wasteofspace, this is the "offending" line \defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text} \setmainfont{Linux Libertine O}  \usepackage[super]{natbib} \usepackage[perpage,symbol]{footmisc}  \let\sc\scshape \let\bf\bfseries \let\it\itfamily  \setlrmarginsandblock{23mm}{23mm}{*} \setulmarginsandblock{23mm}{198mm}{*} \checkandfixthelayout  \begin{document}  \bibliographystyle{plainnat} \setcitestyle{nature} \thispagestyle{empty}  This is a nice\footnote{(That is to say, minimal.)} example.\cite{lenat1976artificial,lenat1984and} Unfortunately, it has some problems.\footnote{From an aesthetic point of view.}  \bibliography{corneli}{}  \end{document}     But if we don't load , then we get this other slightly problematic result:   I guess I can live with the small and over-elevated asterisk.  It looks less bad when it follows a period. why $1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1+\dots}}}$ cannot be equal to $\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}$  I know that some of you will answer because it is positive.I know it but I don't know how to prove it.Maybe the second part is positive how do you know that?Thanks in advance. How does the subject-verb agreement work when a singular noun describes a plural one? Of the following, which sentence is righter?  The computers is a good choice. The computers are a good choice.  Is there a rule about these types of formations? Please explain. Eclipse menus are cut off or don't show I'm using Ubuntu 13.10 (with JDK 1.7.0_45).  I've downloaded and uncompressed Eclipse Kepler for Java EE Developers.  The software menus are messed up. I didn't notice similar problems in other software.  When I click any menu in Eclipse, the drop-down seems to be "cut". Sometimes the drop-down shows, but the options are invisible.  I tried Eclipse Indigo, but the same problem occurs. Parallel universes: are there an infinite amount of universes? Parallel universe: in every universe, you are presented with a different decision. Does that mean there are an infinite amount of parallel universes? I.e., if in one universe I choose to go left, I am then presented with different choices vs if i choose right, and that creates more universes with more decisions to be made.  Or does it mean that in the end of one's life we end up in the same place, meaning that its just one parallel universe that eventually collides with the other. "I didn't realize it was him." Is the prefix "pre-" meaningless in the terms "pre-heated" and "pre-board"? This question poses a paradox of meaning. The general question is whether, if two sentences (x and y) can be used in the same situation, with the same literal meaning, and x and y only differ in that x has morphological affixes that y doesn't, aren't the surplus affixes "meaningless" by the alternation test?   Take this example:  I put the chicken inside a preheated oven.    Wouldn't it make more sense to say:  I put the chicken inside a heated oven.      There is only two states an oven can possibly be in—heated or unheated.      Another example: Does first-class board the plane, or pre-board the plane?  What does that mean—to get on before you get on? How can I make Ubuntu 18.04 / 18.10 desktop use Unity (be like Ubuntu 14.04)? Site hosted on EC2 / Amazon held hostage with private key I have a new client whose previous developer has left her high &amp; dry with her site on Amazon/EC2. He holds the private key to the instance, and though she has full access to the Amazon control panel (she's paying $300/mo for a site that has like 3 visitors per week) she doesn't have any way to get her content off and move to a new host.  I'm not familiar with AWS and am not sure how to help her. The site's group/file permissions are screwed up on the server so exporting the content/database via her WordPress control panel isn't working.  Any ideas on how to help her? Thanks!