I recently bought Asus X53E a few weeks ago and I have a third party charger which I bought a few months ago.  Can I use the third party charger on my laptop?  My Asus charger says  100-240V 1.5A INPUT 19V 3.42A OUTPUT  And then the third party does say the exact same words,  and I can plug the third party charger onto my laptop perfectly as well.  Here is the photo of the two chargers.
I have a Toshiba Satellite laptop. My charger has stopped working.  I have access to a Lenovo charger. Can I use this charger on my laptop?
Is it possible to kill people indirectly with the Death Note? in the Death Note states:        Whether the cause of the individual's death is either a suicide or accident, if the death leads to the death of more than the intended, the person will simply die of a heart attack. This is to ensure that other lives are not influenced.      However,  states:        Even though only one name is written in the Death Note, if it influences and causes other humans that are not written in it to die, the victim’s cause of death will be a heart attack      Besides the fact that I find these 2 rules to be contradicting (correct me if I'm wrong), it still made me curious: Is it possible to kill people indirectly with the Death Note?  For example, writing a heart surgeon's name during a operation, or a pilot's name while mid-flight. So, for my science fair I had to test the gauge of a copper wire vs electrical resistance. What I did was I set up a series circuit involving a 6v battery, a light bulb, a multimeter, and a voltmeter. I would change out three different wires with three different gauges.   For the 4-gauge wire, I got 0.004V and 0.04A. For the 8-gauge wire, I got 0.003V and 0.04A For the 12-gauge wire, I got 0.001V and 0.04A.   In this experiment, what would the independent and dependent variables?  We also have to fill out a table like this: Show that $\partial_\nu T^{\mu\nu} = - j_\nu F^{\mu\nu}$ In a theoretical physics homework problem, I have to show the following: $$\partial_\nu T^{\mu\nu} = - j_\nu F^{\mu\nu}$$  Where $T$ is the Energy-Momentum-Tensor, $j$ the generalized current and $F$ the Field-Tensor. We use the $g$ for the metric tensor, I think in English the $\eta$ is more common.  I know the following relationships:   Current and magnetic potential with Lorenz gauge condition: $$\mathop\Box A^\mu = \mu_0 j^\mu$$ Energy-Momentum-Tensor: $$T^{\mu\nu} = \frac1{\mu_0} g^{\mu\alpha} F_{\alpha\beta} F^{\beta\nu} + \frac1{4\mu_0} g^{\mu\nu} F_{\kappa\lambda} F^{\kappa\lambda}$$ Field-Tensor: $$F^{\mu\nu} = 2 \partial^{[\mu} A^{\nu]} = \partial^{\mu} A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu} A^{\mu}$$ d'Alembert operator: $$\mathop\Box = \partial_\mu \partial^\mu$$ Bianchi identity: $$\partial^{[\mu} F^{\nu\alpha]} = 0$$   So far I have set all the definitions into the formula I have to show, but I only end up a lot of terms from antisymmetrisation and product rule. I also drew all what I have in , but I still cannot see how to tackle this problem.  Could somebody please give me a hint into the right direction? I want to list a company name in the author field of a bibliographic entry:  @book{CUDA,   author    = {NVIDIA Corporation},   title     = {NVIDIA CUDA Compute Unified Device Architecture Programming Guide},   publisher = {NVIDIA Corporation},   year      = {2007} }   But the entry keeps showing up "N. Corporation".  Is there a way to get the full author name to show up?  I'm currently using the siam BibTEX style. For all $a, m, n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$,   $$\gcd(a^n - 1, a^m - 1) = a^{\gcd(n, m)} - 1$$ I am a bit lost how one has deduced the formula for electric field with electric dipole because of some inconsistency between different sources. The  contains a delta function in the formula, but  gives only the formula without the delta function,  $$\bar{E} = -\nabla \phi = \frac{-p}{4\pi \epsilon_{0} r^{3}} ( \hat{e}_{z}-3\hat{u}_{r}(\hat{u}_{r} \cdot \hat{u}_{z}) ) $$  Is it intentionally left out?  My notes mention that the dipole is with a circular thing $P=Q d$ where $d$ is distance and $Q$ is charge. The 3 different equals What is the normal operating temperature for the MacBook (2016 generation)? Back transforming regression results when modeling log(y) I'm fitting a regression on the $\log(y)$.  Is it valid to back transform point estimates (and confidence/prediction intervals) by exponentiation?  I don't believe so, since $E[f(X)] \ne f(E[X])$ but wanted other's opinions.  My example below shows conflicts with back transforming (.239 vs .219).  set.seed(123)  a=-5 b=2  x=runif(100,0,1) y=exp(a*x+b+rnorm(100,0,.2)) # plot(x,y)  ### NLS Fit f &lt;- function(x,a,b) {exp(a*x+b)}  fit &lt;- nls(y ~ exp(a*x+b),  start = c(a=-10, b=15))  co=coef(fit) # curve(f(x=x, a=co[1], b=co[2]), add = TRUE,col=2,lwd=1.2)  predict(fit,newdata=data.frame(x=.7)) [1] 0.2393773  ### LM Fit # plot(x,log(y)) # abline(lm(log(y)~x),col=2) fit=lm(log(y)~x) temp=predict(fit,newdata=data.frame(x=.7),interval='prediction') exp(temp)         fit       lwr       upr 1 0.2199471 0.1492762 0.3240752 Trash icon and files have disappeared from the desktop after upgrade to Ubuntu 19.04 What is the origin of "that's using your noggin"? Definitions and usage of Covariant, Form-invariant & Invariant? Just wondering about the definitions and usage of these three terms.  To my understanding so far, "covariant" and "form-invariant" are used when referring to physical laws, and these words are synonyms?  "Invariant" on the other hand refers to physical quantities?  Would you ever use "invariant" when talking about a law? I ask as I'm slightly confused over a sentence in my undergrad modern physics textbook:     "In general, Newton's laws must be replaced by Einstein's relativistic laws...which hold for all speeds and are invariant, as are all physical laws, under the Lorentz transformations." [emphasis added]      ~ Serway, Moses &amp; Moyer. Modern Physics, 3rd ed.   Did they just use the wrong word? When should I use Inline vs. External Javascript? I would like to know when I should include external scripts or write them inline with the html code, in terms of performance and ease of maintenance.  What is the general practice for this?  Real-world-scenario - I have several html pages that need client-side form validation. For this I use a jQuery plugin that I include on all these pages. But the question is, do I:   write the bits of code that configure this script inline? include all bits in one file that's share among all these html pages? include each bit in a separate external file, one for each html page?   Thanks. Ubuntu 20.04 run ok on Lenovo ThinkPad E15 laptop? Find all solutions of the equation $n^m=x^2+py^2$ which satisfy the following properties Prove or disprove that,     There always exists a solution of the equation, $$n^m=x^2+py^2$$ with odd $x$ and $y$ and for all $m\geq k$ for some positive integral $k$. Here $p$ is an odd prime and $n\in 2\mathbb{N}$. Is $k$ dependent on $n$? If so then find a way to calculate the value of $k$.   This is basically one of my conjecture which I am trying to prove for quite sometime. Unfortunately, I have progressed very little in this problem. So far I have been only able to prove that for all $m\geq3$ , $n=2$ and $p=7$ there is always a solution of the equation meeting the constraints.   Any idea how to tackle the problem?    Update  After D. Burde's answer of the original problem (see below) I am now interested in finding all $(n,m,p)$ triplets such that the equation holds. Any ideas regarding this problem? How to set the background color of the Linux console screen? Note: I reworked the question to clarify the issues. This is a trivial question that can be answered in several parts because the question has several attributes.  Unfortunately, the question may be reworked when the person asking the question apprehends (knows) some parts of the answer as well as the structure of the question.  Therefore, the question is presented from a different point of view than the original one.  How to change the color setting¹ of the Linux console, using a shell utility? How to change the color setting¹ of a terminal emulator, using a shell utility?  Originally, I wanted to change the background color of the Linux console during the execution of a shell script. The following proposition works as I wanted.  #!/bin/sh  # set the background color of the terminal tput setab 6 clear  printf "%s\n" 'background: cyan'  # do some tasks  cd /usr/src/initramfs pwd ls -l  # the background of the shell output is cyan   Nonetheless, someone may encounter several glitches (or difficulties).   For instance, if the screen is not cleared, the background color is only applied to the text output, during a shell script execution. If the command tput setab 6 is submitted with the command line and the screen is not cleared, the background color is only applied to a small portion of the output text. If the command tput setab 6 is submitted on the command line and the screen is cleared, the background color is applied to the full screen but only persists until another command is submitted. [...]  ¹ background color Print lines between (and excluding) two patterns Customize equation numbering for Equation environment? I want to manually label equation number ? For example I want to label this equation 3.1 instead of (1) which automatically pops up. Is it also possible in split environment as well or not ?      \begin{equation}     \log \mu_{ijk}= \lambda + \lambda_i ^I + \lambda_j ^J+\lambda_k ^K+\lambda_{ij} ^{IJ}+\lambda_{ik} ^{IK}+\lambda_{jk} ^{JK}+\lambda_{ijk} ^{IJK} \label{eq:3.1}     \end{equation} I often find that I can zoom in to a point, but then cannot zoom any more, even when there is a lot of room to zoom to the meshes on the scene.   This is particularly annoying in the following scenario:  I often land up left clicking on the scene and the 3D cursor shifts there. I use Shift+C to shift the 3D cursor back to the origin. However, this also centers the view on the cursor and shifts the view to show all objects, and sometimes this zooms things way out &ndash; at this point, if I try to zoom in, I can zoom in to a point (using the pinch/zoom on trackpad), but then it stops zooming in.   How do I zoom in after that? Is there anything else I am doing wrong in this case? Show that every prime $p>3$ is either of the form $6n+1$ or of the form $6n+5$ Show that every prime $p&gt;3$ is either of the form $6n+1$ or of the form $6n+5$, where $n=0,1,2, \dots$