is over 2 years old and doesn't work with the newest version of MacOS (10.14.2).   I've tried clearing cache space, and I have almost 5GB free but it still feels the need to notify me every 3 minutes which is both distracting and unhelpful.   is also not helpful at all.
After upgrading to macOS Sierra, I'm getting the notification that "Your disk is almost full. Save space by optimizing storage.":    The options appear to be to store my files in iCloud, automatically delete files, or manually delete files:    My problem/irritation is that I have 80GB free of my 440GB volume.  The question: is there a way to silence this notification in a (semi-)permanent fashion, or to change the threshold it uses for the notification?
Distance between surfaces Do we have name for these kind of "flat graphics" images? Is it possible to detect 32 bit vs 64 bit in a bash script? I am writing a bash script to deal with some installations in an automated way... I have the possibility of getting one such program in 32 or 64 bit binary... is it possible to detect the machine architecture from bash so I can select the correct binary?  This will be for Ubuntu machines. How can I see the source of built-in JavaScript functions? Is "performance" singular or also plural? Windows License stored in UEFI/BIOS Since Windows 10 (or earlier?). It has become standard to store the license product key in the UEFI/BIOS.  I am in the market for buying a new (custom build, individual parts) PC with a new Windows 10 License.  However I was wondering (and can't find clear information on this subject). What the differences between the licenses are when it comes to OEM and Retail.  If in the far future I were to sell this PC:   Would the license (whether OEM or Retail), be stored in the UEFI/BIOS, where it could be used by the new owner? If so, can I remove the license key from the UEFI/BIOS?   I want to know this because I don't want to buy Windows 10 every single time I buy a new PC (since no new versions of Windows will be created, only updates). Currently questions are added in a rapid pace to SO, so that new questions disappear very quickly from the homepage. It I want to see questions from my areas of interest I can do either:   Go to the tagged/my tags page, but then I will see the questions only according to the votes Supply a list of tags "x or y or z", but it seems the list is limited to 15 or 20 tags.   What I suggest is to have categories as grouping of tags - the .net category , java category , web development category , etc. It can also help new users to locate questions from their area of expertise they can answer. We can decide that a category can contain between 5 and 20  tags in order no to have too narrow or too broad categories (numbers were given just for the sake of argument) From  by Richard Brualdi  We have a chess master. He has 11 weeks to prepare for a competition so he decides that he will practice everyday by playing at least 1 game a day. To make sure that he's able to take a couple of breaks, he also decides that he wont play more than 12 games per week.  My question is, how do you prove/dis-prove that there will be a succession of (consecutive) days in which he will play k games, $k \geq  22$?  Specifically, I don't quite understand the use of the pigeonhole principle here.  Thanks in advance! :D  EDIT  I'll try to clarify what I'm asking:  The goal is to prove that for every possible practice schedule that the chess master makes, there will always be a consecutive sequence of days such that he plays exactly k games.  So for example, if k = 22, how do you prove that no matter what his schedule is like, he will always play exactly k games in r days, $1 \leq r\leq  77$.  My main question is: what is the general method for proving different values of k? Are there values of k (from 1 to 132 inclusive) that are impossible to obtain?  Note that he does not necessarily have to play 132 games within 77 days! Also, keep in mind the bounds of k. What is the difference between a neural network and a deep neural network, and why do the deep ones work better? I haven't seen the question stated precisely in these terms, and this is why I make a new question.  What I am interested in knowing is not the definition of a neural network, but understanding the actual difference with a deep neural network.  For more context: I know what a neural network is and how backpropagation works. I know that a DNN must have multiple hidden layers. However, 10 years ago in class I learned that having several layers or one layer (not counting the input and output layers) was equivalent in terms of the functions a neural network is able to represent (see Cybenko's ), and that having more layers made it more complex to analyse without gain in performance. Obviously, that is not the case anymore.  I suppose, maybe wrongly, that the differences are in terms of training algorithm and properties rather than structure, and therefore I would really appreciate if the answer could underline the reasons that made the move to DNN possible (e.g. mathematical proof or randomly playing with networks?) and desirable (e.g. speed of convergence?) How can I do the following in Git?  My current branch is branch1 and I have made some local changes. However, I now realize that I actually meant to be applying these changes to branch2. Is there a way to apply/merge these changes so that they become local changes on branch2 without committing them on branch1? I am trying to prove that all vector spaces can be written as the direct sum of two subspaces.  My attempt: If each vector in vector space V can be uniquely written as the sum of two other vectors in V, the two vectors can be categorized into subspaces and thus V can be written as the direct sum of these subspaces. I am not sure how to show that this is true for all cases though. Edit Sorry for the confusion,to clarify I meantGiven a vector space V with a subspace W, prove that there exists a subspace W' such that the direct sum of W and W' is V.I am not sure about my proof method at all. Thank you. Unable to set DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH in shell on OSX 10.11.1 In shell scripts used for unit testing with dynamic libraries in a directory other than the typical @rpath, I have previously been able to set DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH to set the directory containing the libraries. Under 10.11.1, bash seems to ignore attempts to set this environment variable:  $ sh -x testscript.sh + DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/Users/something/testinglibs + export DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH + exec printenv   and DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH is not present in printenv's output.  Is this a security-related hack in 10.11's shell? I haven't been able to find this change documented in man pages or online. I have my bachelors degree in engineering science: computer science, option electrotechnic. I have a good understanding of basic mechanics and dynamics, calculus (differential equations).  The books I'm now having a look at are:       What book do you recommend for studying fluid dynamics on my own and why? Is some of my internal memory missing? I know that the product of two Gaussians is a Gaussian, and I know that the convolution of two Gaussians is also a Gaussian. I guess I was just wondering if there's a proof out there to show that the convolution of two Gaussians is a Gaussian. What is the fallacy that privileges one person over another? I see this a lot, someone in a category of people attempts to shut down anyone with an opinion that is not from the same category. For example, people without children weighing in on parenting; the parent may say something like "well, since you don't have kids and I do, my position is of more validity than yours."  Another example: a drug user (of some kind) telling someone who has never done drugs and does not care to, "until you tried it, you have no right to judge me."  People frequently try to limit the consideration on opinions to those in their same group, while it is perfectly reasonable that the non-drug user, especially if they are a chemist or well read on the subject, may have an equally valid opinion, or even more valid. In fact some might even say that someone NOT in the category has a better chance of being objective and seeing the forest for the trees.  So what is the fallacy of trying to shut down opinions when the source of the opinion is not someone who has personally had the experience under discussion? Installing Wi-Fi driver for Realtek Semiconductor RTL8723DE Device [10ec:d723] How do I install Wi-Fi drivers for Realtek RTL8723DE device in Ubuntu 16.04?  lspci -v | grep -i network 02:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device d723 How to repair Ubuntu installation after interrupted dist-upgrade without losing any custom settings? Sum over multiple indices What is the most effective way for float and double comparison? What would be the most efficient way to compare two double or two float values?  Simply doing this is not correct:  bool CompareDoubles1 (double A, double B) {    return A == B; }   But something like:  bool CompareDoubles2 (double A, double B)  {    diff = A - B;    return (diff &lt; EPSILON) &amp;&amp; (-diff &lt; EPSILON); }   Seems to waste processing.  Does anyone know a smarter float comparer?