I'm using MySQL's AUTO_INCREMENT field and InnoDB to support transactions. I noticed when I rollback the transaction, the AUTO_INCREMENT field is not rollbacked? But when I don't call RollBack the id doesn't change.  try {  //My Code } catch (MySqlException ex) {     //deadlock exception in mysql        if (ex.Number == 1213)     {         //I don't use RollBack and the id dosen't change         MessageBox.Show("Try again", "Warning");     }     else     {         msqlTr.Rollback();         txtError.Text = "Erreur : " + ex.Message;         Log.LogError.setError(ex);         MessageBox.Show("Erreur : " + ex.Message, "Erreur", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error);     } } catch (Exception ex) {     msqlTr.Rollback();     txtError.Text = "Erreur : " + ex.Message;     Log.LogError.setError(ex);     MessageBox.Show("Erreur : " + ex.Message, "Erreur", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error); }   If this code correct, I mean that when I don't call rollback?
I'm using MySQL's AUTO_INCREMENT field and InnoDB to support transactions. I noticed when I rollback the transaction, the AUTO_INCREMENT field is not rollbacked? I found out that it was designed this way but are there any workarounds to this?
How to replace ${} placeholders in a text file? I want to pipe the output of a "template" file into MySQL, the file having variables like ${dbName} interspersed. What is the command line utility to replace these instances and dump the output to standard output? Can't find Corruption Is there any intuition or meaning regarding Cauchy-Riemann equations? How do Horcruxes work? A few questions regarding the Horcruxes.   Had Voldemort actually succeeded in using a Horcrux, would he come back the same age (biologically and/or aesthetically) he was when he made the Horcrux, or the age he would biologically be if he had never died (half died)? If Harry was a Horcrux, then in the graveyard, when Wormtail added Harry's blood to the potion to bring Voldemort back, didn't that technically use up the Horcrux inside of Harry? So in Deathly Hallows when Voldemort kills Harry, shouldn't Harry have actually died rather than just have the Horcrux inside him destroyed, seeing as it was technically used in the Goblet of Fire? In what order should one apply max HP reduction and damage? A character at 10/26 HP is hit by a Wraith and fails the Constitution saving throw. They take 21 damage and their maximum HP is reduced to 5.  Are they unconscious because the 11 excess damage is less than 26 or dead because it's greater than 5? Integrate $\int \frac{25 - x^2}{x^4} \operatorname d\!x$ I think we use trig substitution for this. But I'm not sure where to even begin with this   $$\int \frac{25 - x^2}{x^4} \operatorname d\!x$$ Determine number of pages in a PDF file Is there a way to make sure that a deleted file can not be recovered?   As you know, deleting a file by pressing shift-del or using trash doesn't mean that file is gone forever. It resides somewhere in the computer.  In day to day life, law enforcement or thieves use recovery programs to reveal our private data or something else.   They can recover all data that resides on hard disk, in RAM, and even USB.  To protect us from these people, what should one do? Which program should one use?  Note: I don't want an answer like first use a recovery program then erase that file with shred. With just one program, I want to erase all unused/deleted files on my computer. Prove that if $\gcd(ab,c)=1$, then $\gcd(a,c)=1$. Can we implement temporary automatic comment ban on 'x' number of validated rude comment flags? There's been problems with abusive comments since the site started.   We still haven't managed to conquer the issue.   Users can be issued chat bans and post bans. The API automatically bans IP addresses with validated spam flags. (Would it be difficult to implement comment bans? Would mods have the power to impose comment restrictions?).   Although comments have been classically referred to as second class citizens, rude comments on the site are the one place that is driving people away.   Can we implement temporary automatic comment ban on 'x' number of validated rude comment flags? It would probably be better if the exact heuristics were not disclosed publicly, much like the serial voting scripts  This question  was asked 7 years ago. Can we revisit it?  This question is related, but is asking for a more complex approach: Let $P(x)$ be a degree $n$ polynomial with distinct roots $r_1, r_2, \cdots r_n$. Prove that   $$\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{P''(r_i)}{P'(r_i)}=0$$  My proof: We can equivalently rewrite the polynomial as $(x-r_1)(x-r_2)\cdots(x-r_n)$ and if we plug in the roots in the polynomial, we get that all of them are equal to $0$ so their first derivatives are equal to $1$ and then their second derivatives are equal to $0$ which means that all quotients are equal to $0$ and there for the sum is as well, $Q.E.D$  Don't show the solution please, but if you have a hint, feel free. Thank you. Page number in title page I want to add page number from 531 to 536 in my latex IEEE conference template. But page number appearing from page 2 i.e. 532.  \documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran} %\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts  \makeatletter \let\old@ps@headings\ps@headings \let\old@ps@IEEEtitlepagestyle\ps@IEEEtitlepagestyle \def\confheader#1{%     % for all pages except the first     \def\ps@headings{%         \old@ps@headings%         \def\@oddhead{\strut\hfill#1\hfill\strut}%         \def\@evenhead{\strut\hfill#1\hfill\strut}%     }%     % for the first page     \def\ps@IEEEtitlepagestyle{%         \old@ps@IEEEtitlepagestyle%         \def\@oddhead{\strut\hfill#1\hfill\strut}%         \def\@evenhead{\strut\hfill#1\hfill\strut}%     }%     \ps@headings% } \makeatother  \confheader{ 2020 IEEE International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management (ICCAKM) }   %%footer %\usepackage[pscoord]{eso-pic} %\newcommand{\placetextbox}[3]{ %   \setbox0=\hbox{#3} %   \AddToShipoutPictureFG*{ \put(\LenToUnit{#1\paperwidth},\LenToUnit{#2\paperheight}){\vtop{{\null}\makebox[0pt][c]{#3}}} %   } %} %\placetextbox{.23}{0.055}{\small{978-1-5386-8007-0/19/\$31.00~\copyright 2019 IEEE}}     \usepackage{cite} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts} \usepackage{algorithmic} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[export]{adjustbox} \usepackage{subcaption}     % %\usepackage[pscoord]{eso-pic} %\newcommand{\placetextbox}[3]{ %   \setbox0=\hbox{#3} %   \AddToShipoutPictureFG{ \put(\LenToUnit{#1\paperwidth},\LenToUnit{#2\paperheight}){\vtop{{\null}\makebox[0pt][c]{#3}}} %   } %} %\placetextbox{.2}{0.055}{978-1-4799-5522-0/15/\$31.00~\copyright 2015 IEEE}   \IEEEoverridecommandlockouts \IEEEpubid{\makebox[\columnwidth]{978-1-7281-0666-3/20/\$31.00~\copyright~2020         IEEE \hfill} \hspace{\columnsep}\makebox[\columnwidth]{ }}      \thispagestyle{plain}     \pagestyle{plain}     \setcounter{page}{531}   \begin{document}  \title{Performance Analysis of Physically     Unclonable Function Based on Voltage Divider Arrays} \author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Sumit Chaudhary$^{1}$}     \IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{Dept. of Electronics and Communication} \\         \textit{MNIT Jaipur, India}\\         2016pev5165@mnit.ac.in}     \and     \IEEEauthorblockN{Chitrakant Sahu$^{2}$}     \IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{Dept. of Electronics and Communication} \\         \textit{MNIT Jaipur, India}\\         chitrakant.ece@mnit.ac.in}}  \maketitle   \end{document} What is a word/idiom for 'unable to decide'? Let's say I have an important decision to make and I can't decide between two competing things (like break up with a girl or not break up with her). What would be a word/idiom to express that? Shortcuts in Objective-C to concatenate NSStrings Are there any shortcuts to (stringByAppendingString:) string concatenation in Objective-C, or shortcuts for working with NSString in general?  For example, I'd like to make:  NSString *myString = @"This"; NSString *test = [myString stringByAppendingString:@" is just a test"];   something more like:  string myString = "This"; string test = myString + " is just a test"; Which one should should I use? For some reason I have always used "towards", but I see some people saying "toward", like :     A great deal of his work in economic   theory has been directed toward   strengthening the foundations of our   understanding of central banking and   social insurance--indeed, one of my   most advanced macroeconomic classes   was nothing but a set of changes rung   upon a particular model that Peter   Diamond had advanced at...   Is there a difference between the two? When should they be used? Calculate Euler equations of fluid dynamics without division? I'm working on the calculation of the  with the . Unfortunately I'm not allowed to do a division. So I'm wondering if there's a form which does not need a division.  At the moment the Euler equations look like this:  $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \begin{pmatrix} \rho \\ \rho v_1 \\ \rho v_2 \\ \rho v_3 \\ \rho E \end{pmatrix} = -\mathrm{div} \begin{pmatrix} \rho v_1 &amp; \rho v_2 &amp; \rho v_3 \\  \rho v_1^2 + p &amp; \rho v_1 v_2 &amp; \rho v_1 v_3 \\  \rho v_2 v_1 &amp; \rho v_2^2 + p &amp; \rho v_2 v_3 \\  \rho v_3 v_1 &amp; \rho v_3 v_2 &amp; \rho v_3^2 + p \\  (\rho E + p) v_1 &amp; (\rho E + p) v_2 &amp; (\rho E + p) v_3 \end{pmatrix} $$  As you can see, I first need to calculate $\frac{\rho v_1}{\rho}$ to get $v_1$ so I can calculate e.g. $\rho v_1^2$ Tail sum for expectation In , the tail sum formula for expectation is introduced for a nonnegative (0,1,...) discrete random variable $X$:  $$E(X) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty P(X &gt; i).$$   I wonder if there is a similar formula for nonnegative continuous random variable $X$:  $$E(X) = \int_0^\infty P(X &gt; x) dx?$$  If no, are there some conditions for it to hold? And how can it be proved?  Here is my thought:  If the cdf $F$ of $X$ is bijective, then $X=F^{-1}(U)$ for some random variable $U$ uniformly distributed over $[0,1)$. So $$E(X) =     \int_0^1 F^{-1}(u) du.$$  To prove the tail sum formula, it suffices to prove $$\int_0^1     F^{-1}(u) du = \int_0^\infty P(X &gt; x) dx.$$ But I am stuck here.   What's more, is the condition that the cdf $F$ of $X$ is bijective really necessary for tail sum formula to hold? Can tail sum formula be generalized to a random variable that is not necessarily nonnegative?   Thanks! How to show that the monomials are not a Schauder basis for $C[0,1]$ why the monomials are not a Schauder basis for $C[0,1]$?  $p_n(x)=x^n$ such that $(p_n)$ does not form a Schauder basis for $C[0,1]$  span$\lbrace p_n : n\ge 0\rbrace$ is dense in $C[0,1]$ by Weierstrass approxmation theorem, but I cannot figure out why they are not a Schauder basis.  Could you please explain Delete the entire table rendered from different pages using Javascript how to get user permissions for nfs share?