If I start with an  on the battlefield and cast , how much health would I gain? I know it is somewhere between 4 and 6.  Posible options in my mind: a. The tokens enter at the same time, but the rally ability only counts there being two creatures on at once: The Ondu Cleric, and the token who activated Ondu Cleric's ability. This happens twice, so 2*2 is 4. (Didn't seem likely, but hey, this might be the case) b. The tokens enter one at a time, and the rally ability gives 2 health, then 3 health for a total of 5. c. The tokens enter at the same time, and the rally ability counts 3 creatures both times it is activated for a total of 6 (2*3).  Optional Question: What if I started with 2 Ondu Clerics on the battlefield? Would that just double the health gained, or would something else happen?
I was playing modern with the owner of a shop.  He played a  which he used to bring in 7 lands: 5 basic mountains and 2  cards.  He then claimed that each  triggered 5 times (killing me).  I am doubting this now.    Here is my reason: The two  cards entered at the same time as the other 5 basic lands.  That means when they were on the battlefield and their ability was in effect, the other 5 basic lands were already there too.  That seems too late to trigger a "Enters the Battlefield" effect.  So here is my question.  Am I right or wrong?  If I am wrong, please show me how the enter the battlefield effect can trigger for something that enters the battlefield at the same time as itself.  If I am right, please show me the rules that prove it.  I now have two shop owners that are convinced that this is a legal play.  If it is not legal, I am going to need clear rules citations to convince them.    Side note:  If I am wrong and it is a legal play, then I have a follow up scenario.  Say I have 2  cards and 5 other human cards in my graveyard.  If I play a spell that lets me return all of them to the battlefield at the same time (say ), would the  cards get 6 +1/+1 counters on them?    To me, if the trick that was played on me with  is legal then my  cards should also get the +1/+1 counters.
Internet through wireless hotspot, intranet through wired network - can I use both at the same time? PGFPlots: Understanding how to draw plots on different layers and arrange them I have gone through previous questions [,,], but I still couldn't figure out how to draw plots on different layers and change their order of drawing.  For this MWE, I would be grateful if I could figure out how to change the order of appearance of the three plots in such a way that the legend entries have the same order while keeping the plots commands/definitions in the same order as much as possible.  \RequirePackage{luatex85} \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{pgfplots} \pgfplotsset{compat=newest}  \begin{document}  \begin{tikzpicture}     \begin{axis}[             legend style={                 at={([yshift=30pt]0.5,1)},                 anchor=north},             legend columns=-1,             xmin=0, xmax=10,             ymin=0, ymax=10,         ]         %         \addplot [red,      line width = 5pt,   domain=0:10]    {x}; \addlegendentry{$x$}            \addplot [black,    line width = 5pt,   domain=0:10]    {(x-5)^2}; \addlegendentry{$(x-5)^2$}         \addplot [yellow,   line width = 5pt,   domain=0:10]    {10-(x-5)^2}; \addlegendentry{$10-(x-5)^2$}     \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document} Is the word tenfold a misnomer? How to update textbox in form1 from form2? Do lightsabers have safety settings? While rewatching Star Wars my skin was crawling while watching Luke practice saber technique against a remote on the Falcon.  There's no way I'd want to be in the same room with a beginner waving a lightsaber around, let alone a beginner with his eyes covered.  Samurai apparently practiced with  to reduce training injuries.  Do lightsabers have lower power settings so that a wrong move while practicing doesn't sever a limb or chop through the hull into vacuum? Delete all lines in Notepad++ except lines containing a word I need? (I'm going to link to this Stackexchange post concerning Nullary Operations: )  In general an  is a function $f:S^n \to S$, where $n$ denotes the arity of the operation, and a  is a function $f:S^0 \to S$.  It is clear that $S^n=S \times S \times \cdots \times S$ denotes the Cartesian product of a set with itself ($n$ times), however $S^0$ makes little sense to me.  One might define $S^0=\emptyset$. At first glance, that seems like a good choice. However then a nullary operation makes no sense, since it must be a function $f: A \to B$ where $A$ and $B$ are two sets representing the domain and codomain of the function. And note a function is defined in terms of relation, where a relation is a subset of the Cartesian product $A \times B$. So when we think of $A=S^0=\emptyset$ and $B=S$, so that we have a nullary operation $f:\emptyset \to S$, what is a a subset of $\emptyset \times S$? What even is $\emptyset \times S$? By definition of the Cartesian product, \begin{equation} \emptyset \times S = \{(a,b):a \in \emptyset\textrm{ and }b \in S\}. \end{equation} But there exists no $a \in \emptyset$! Therefore there exist no ordered pairs in our Cartesian product! Therefore $\emptyset \times S = \emptyset !$. Remember a function is a relation which is a subset of the Cartesian product. Therefore our relation is the empty set, and therefore also $f=\emptyset$.    Edit: We got the definition sorted out in the comments. Thanks especially to Hayden and Christoff for their great help. In summary, we figured out that $S^0=\{()\}$, the set containing only one element, the "empty $n$-tuple". Then if taking $S=\{1,2,...,k\}$, then a nullary operation $f:S^0 \to S$ is a function, i.e. some subset of $S^0 \times S = \{()\} \times S$. Looking at $\{()\} \times S$, this equals $\{((),1),((),2),...,((),k)\}$. Then a function is a special subset of this, so that each element of the domain (and there is only one element, namely $()$) is paired with exactly one element of the codomain. Therefore a function would have the form $f=\{((),a)\}$ where $a$ is one of $1,2,...,k$. Thank you for your help. How can I repair a buried 120v cable splice to make it meet code? I have an electrical question. I have a cable feeding an outdoor yard light. It was cut, I spliced it, soldered it and wrapped it with tape. Is there a way to splice and bury it safely to code? If not, I'll need to dig a 30 foot trench to replace the whole length.  Was about 8 inches below ground, surfaced over the years and probably hit with the weed trimmer.   It is outdoor cable inside copper tubing. Years ago when I bought the wire I knew outdoor was gray. The box said outdoor but it is white like indoor wire.   It was spliced about 20 years ago but am fixing up house and like to hide the ugly splice. Does a multiple-entry Schengen visa allow visiting other Schengen countries later, without going via the issuing country? My wife was just issued a multiple entry visa by France, which is good for one year.  Our first trip will be to France, the issuing country.  My question is: after we leave the EU and return, must future trips also start in France? Or may we go directly to (say) Greece from the US on a later visit? Total time derivatives and partial coordinate derivatives in classical mechanics I am not an expert of random forest but I clearly understand that the key issue with random forest is the (random) tree generation. Can you explain me how the trees are generated? (i.e. What is the used distribution for tree generation?)  Thanks in advance ! Give moderators the option to select a deletion reason when removing posts Big Endian vs. Little Endian in Qiskit I've noticed that Q# favors Little Endian. Meaning that most operations are designed for this type of encoding.  Is is it the same with Qiskit? If we minimize the Wasserstein loss, $$W_1 (P_S, P_T) = \underset{\gamma \in \Pi}{\text{min }} \sum_{x,y} |x-y|\gamma(x,y)$$ which means we are looking for the coupling $\gamma(x,y)$ that minimizes the cost of moving mass from the source distribution $P_S$ to the target distribution $P_T$,  Do the masses of the source and target distributions have to be identical? If so or not, how are the masses of $P_T$ and $P_S$ accounted for mathematically in, or when minimizing, the shown formula, or what might be missing/overlooked by the Wasserstein approach overall due to the mass differences? How to output a counter with leading zeros? I can output the value of a counter in a LaTeX document via:  \setcounter{mycounter}{1} \arabic{mycounter}   Which inserts a 1. But how do I format the output by, for example, adding a leading zero if mycounter is less than 10 in a way similar to what  lets you do by specifying %02d as your format string? Drawbacks of making public which journal a manuscript is submitted to, while it is under review? Many researchers list out their submitted manuscripts on their website. Some specify the journal name, like     Smith J, Oliver J (under review) My awesome paper. Nature.   while others don't, like     Smith J, Oliver J (under review) My awesome paper.   One reason I can think of as to why some don't mention the journal name is that they may get embarrassed in the case where the current journal rejects the paper. Then, the "circle" will know this paper gets rejected from Nature first and then ends up in an inferior journal.  Besides this, are there any other considerations preventing people from mentioning to which journal they submit a paper to?  P.S.: I am asking because my advisor is a researcher who only mentions accepted  papers on his webpage. As a student hunting jobs, I feel it is advantageous for me to mention my submitted papers on my webpage. I hesitate to do so, as I worry I may make my advisor unhappy by announcing in which journal our papers are currently under review. What is a NullPointerException, and how do I fix it? This is what happens:  sudo apt-get install vlc Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package vlc   Please help. I would also like to know when this error occurs, I've seen it before too. I am asking this question because I've always had the impression that manuscripts submitted to a journal in my field (theoretical linguistics) take an insanely long time to get published, and sometimes I get the impression that this is because, most of the time, nobody other than the author cares about getting things done within a reasonable amount of time. Some examples from personal experience follow.   For the last paper I submitted before getting my PhD, I had to wait nine months from the submission date to get reviews back from the referees. Last week I got a review request from a journal I had never reviewed for previously. The review deadline is March 15 (almost four months). In early October, I submitted a manuscript to a journal that I know asks reviewers to return reviews within 6 weeks. I checked the status of the manuscript online and it still says "with editor". Earlier this year, I was about to start writing a review when my wife went into labor. By the time we came back from the hospital, I had forgotten about the review, so I missed the deadline. The editor didn't contact me to ask about the review until two months after the deadline. Late in 2013, I was asked to write a survey chapter for a handbook. The expected publication date of the handbook is summer 2016.   All of this is not me being unlucky with editors and referees. In private conversations through the years, many colleagues have confirmed that it is virtually unheard of to get reviews back within 3 months of submission; 5 or 6 months seems to be a good average, but in some cases it can take longer (see my first point above). In general, everybody seems to have accepted that the submission-to-printed-journal process is going to take a bare minimum of one year, and that's assuming that the manuscript is accepted without revisions. If revisions are required, two years is not out of the question. Also, it's not like our papers are ridiculously long. I've reviewed about 100 papers so far, and the longest one was about 50 single-space pages; 30-35 single-spaced pages is closer to average.  I remember that, when I was a postdoc, my astrophysics housemate mentioned that in his field the entire submission-to-printed-journal process took only three or four months. I really can't see a good reason why theoretical linguistics shouldn't operate on similar timeframes, other than the fact that everybody seems to have grown used to things taking way longer than they really need to. What are the wait times in other fields? How do you manage to get things done quickly? How do you make the shapefile a Read-only so the client can not make any edits using 10.2.2 ArcGIS.  It is not within a geodatabase, just a stand alone shapefile.  I am using Windows 8