I'm writing some text for the website of my hosting company and I simply cannot figure this one out.  I currently have the following sentence:     We provide reliable hosting for creative professionals and X   I am very confused about X. I need a term for the following:     those who want their own website but do not have a creative professional hired, but rather handle everything on their own   Naturally, I cannot say:     We provide reliable hosting for creative professionals and non-technical people   Any help anyone?  My question is not a duplicate as the context is completely different. Normally this would not be a problem however in this case the term we're looking for is completely different than those already answered in the other question.
I am looking for a term which clearly defines somebody as a non-geek, without being derogatory. The best example I have seen is muggle, but it needs context to be understood, as in "You don't meet many muggles at a comic convention", or "even my muggle friends like my autologlyph fractal decal". But while "muggle" makes it clear that he is a part of the "majority which is different", it is often hard to guess who the minority is.   There are also more specific words, but they are mostly so derogatory that I would consider them rude even in a joke, like luser or n00b. I definitely don't want to use them in a normal conversation.   A search in antonym dictionaries didn't bring up anything. Is there really no such word?
Removal of lines with no more or fewer than 'N' fields? Isn't the const modifier here unnecessary? Bevel not...beveling properly I'm taking a course and the instructor has beveled an edge and I cannot get the same result. My bevel only bevels on segment on one side then the rest, about 4 or 5 segments bevel on the other side. Other words the bevel is not beveling evenly on the top of a cylinder. Pictures below Why does Jack let Walt go? In Breaking Bad S5 E14, Jack not only lets Walt go, but also leaves a barrel of money to him after killing Hank. I don't understand why he would do this. Jack says that, with 7 barrels of money, he doesn't need to cook meth any more, so there is no reason to keep Walt (the witness of the killing) alive, let alone to give him so much money. What's the rationale behind this? Or it's just mercy or respect? Possible Duplicate:          Well, the question is in the title. I always had the impression that "talk to someone" refers to situations when some information must be conveyed to someone else, while "talk with someone" refers to cases that involve a more complex two-sided interaction. E.g., I "talk to my colleague" to tell him that I'm going for a lunch break (no response is required apart from maybe an acknowledgment), while I go and "talk with my colleague" if I have to discuss something with him in detail. Is this correct, or is there any difference between the two phrases, or is there no difference at all? Why did Dumbledore drink the potion in the attempt to get a Horcrux? How to achieve nomenclature entries like: symbol, Description, Dimension and unit, etc? The title is pretty much I want to ask. More detail, the nomenclature entries should be sorted in groups like:   Nomenclature     Acronyms     Symbol  Description     % no Dimensions and Units      ...     Greek Symbols     Symbol  Description             Dimensions     Units     ...     Roman Symbols     Symbol  Description             Dimensions     Units     S       Surface area vector     L^2            m^2     ...    Superscripts     Symbol  Description     % no Dimensions and Units      ...    Dimensionless Numbers     Symbol  Description     Definition     ...   e.g. expected entries like this:       My current nomenclature settings for grouping [book class]:  %---------------------------------------------------------- %                        Nomenclature %---------------------------------------------------------- %\renewcommand{\nomname}{List of Symbols and Abbrev.} \renewcommand\nomgroup[1]{%   \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{A}}{%    \item[\textbf{Acronyms}] }{%                  A - Acronyms     \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{R}}{%      \item[\textbf{Roman Symbols}]}{%            R - Roman       \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{G}}{%         \item[\textbf{•} Symbols }]}{%          G - Greek           \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{S}}{%            \item[\textbf{Superscripts  }]}{{%          S - Superscripts         \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{U}}{%          \item[\textbf{Subscripts }]}{{%                 U - Subscripts         \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{X}}{%          \item[\textbf{Other Symbols }]}%            X - Other Symbols                     {{}}}}}}}}}} %\ifpdf \renewcommand{\nomlabel}[1]{\hspace{1 em}#1}%{\hspace{1.5 em}#1} \renewcommand*{\nompreamble}{\markboth{\nomname}{\nomname}}   But how to extend it with Dimensions and Units? url completion in cartoDB info windows Do you have to want to hurt someone for the cruciatus curse to work? Since humans are not large in mass, do we exert enough gravitational force for a small object to orbit around us? (Assuming that the only gravitational force acting on the object is from the human). Using Newton's law of gravity and using myself as the human mass, I exert a 10^-8 force on a 1 kg object .5 meter away, but I am not sure if even this small of a force will be acceptable. What is the baseline "force" between two objects for 1 to orbit another?  Edit: I am not sure if this is a SpaceExchange question. Show that if $\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}\neq 0$, then $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}) = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{a},\sqrt{b}), \forall a,b\in\mathbb{Q}$ Mongodb: Possible to enlarge a capped collection? If a collection is created as capped, is it possible to increase the cap without losing data?  Or to increase the cap without recreating the whole collection?  Thanks Multiplicative group $(\mathbb R^*, ×)$ is group but $(\mathbb R, ×)$ is not group, why? $\mathbb R^*$ refers to $\mathbb R$ without zero.  Please explain the statement "$\mathbb R$  is not a group under multiplication, it is a group under addition." in the . Basically:   Why is multiplicative group $(\mathbb R^*, ×)$ a group? Why is $(\mathbb R, ×)$ not group? Why are $(\mathbb R^*, +)$ and $(\mathbb R, +)$ groups? I have Dubai work permit mailed to me by my employer. It contains my old passport number which has ECR stamp. I then got a new passport issued without ECR stamping, but with different passport number. I have both passports.  Can I travel to Dubai now? Send Blob file via Apex Rest Callout I'm trying to send a Blob Apex REST callout and it is keep failing. I tried all the examples in the web but didn't work. What is the standard and correct way to send Blob data via REST callouts?  //Parameters String strBody = 'flowIdentifier=1&amp;flowFilename=test.jpg&amp;flowTotalSize=14893&amp;flowCurrentChunkSize=14893&amp;flowChunkSize=14893&amp;flowChunkNumber=1&amp;flowTotalChunks=1';  bodyBlob = //Blob data  HttpRequest request = new HttpRequest(); request.setEndpoint(END_POINT); request.setMethod('POST'); request.setHeader('content-type', 'multipart/form-data'); request.setBodyAsBlob(bodyBlob); request.setBody(strBody);  try{ Http http = new Http(); HttpResponse response = http.send(request); System.debug(response.getBody()); } catch(Exception e) {      System.debug('ERROR:'+e);     } What is the closed form of $\int e^{x^2} \, dx$? How can I do a closed form expansion of $\int e^{x^2} \, dx$? Please be specific as to which method I must use. I have a manuscript that is under review in a major journal which is a main result out of a few recent years of my research. When applying for faculty positions, I would like to send the draft as a part of my writing sample. But since the material is not yet published, I am not sure if it is a good idea.  What are the foreseeable disadvantages of sending an article in review to the faculty search committee?  My area is neuroscience / biomedical engineering.  Update: The paper got into a high-profile journal, and I got a job at a different place which did not require a writing sample. Use a baseline including all observations in lm() Changing isometric drawing's constraint angles in Illustrator Are code questions without an attempt now on topic