It was  that when a tag gold-badge (TGB) holder casts a close vote for dupes, the question gets closed immediately. It  in what order a TGB holder casts their vote.  I have gold tag badges only on Sci-fi &amp; Fantasy Stack Exchange, which I mostly refrain from using due to my tendency to avoid the arguments which nearly always occur when one user hammers a question instead of a community consensus via a review (unless I am up for an argument, which is very rare).  But yesterday, on Stack Overflow, . The fourth voter there holds a gold badge in the iOS tag. Yet, the question wasn't closed until it got a fifth vote. So that got me thinking: Is it possible for TGB holders to take off their golden hat and vote as a normal user? Or do gold-badge closing privileges vary based on where they are coming for i.e. A review requiring five people to agree, irrelevant to the badges they hold while a direct close vote outside the review queue would instantly close the post?  If they can take off the golden hat, how does one do that?
According to  , gold badge holders can now unilaterally close questions as duplicates. I hold seven gold badges for tags on SO, which means I can, on my own, close questions as duplicates for those tagged questions.  Simply put: DO NOT WANT.  However, I do not see any ability in SO (the only SE site I spend much time in) to opt out of any privileges, let alone this one.  Is there a spot that I'm just not seeing that allows me to turn off this new privilege?
Tentative definitions in C and linking Is there to make the login screen appear on the external display in 18.04? What is an example of pairwise independent random variables which are not independent? How do I get the deformed coordinate of a vertex with Python? How might someone find the deformed coordinate via Python or otherwise when using a subdivision modifier with the 'show on cage' option?  For example, a subdivided cube with cage enabled and a vertex selected shows the location of the vertex at 1,1,1 but when manually placing the cursor near on the surface it is closer to .5,.5,.5  I know the vertex location needs to be at its non-deformed location for subdivision to even work but would like to get more accurate point locations at the surface without having to apply to mesh. Generic htaccess redirect www to non-www I would like to redirect www.example.com to example.com. The following htaccess code makes this happen:  RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.example\.com [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://example.com/$1 [L,R=301]   But, is there a way to do this in a generic fashion without hardcoding the domain name? How do I enable error reporting in PHP? Sockets: Discover port availability using Java Why is RAM not put on the CPU chip? Modern CPUs are very fast compared to all things external, including memory (RAM).   It is understandable, since CPU clock frequency has reached a point where it takes several clock ticks for an electric signal simply to run from from the CPU through the bus to RAM chips and back.   It also complicates life on many levels: multi-level cache hierarchies are built to deliver data closer to the CPU, which in turn require complex synchronization logic in the chip. Programs must be written in a cache-friendly way to avoid wait cycles while data is fetched.   Many of these problems could be avoided if a significant amount of RAM was located directly on the CPU chip. It doesn't have to an exclusive arrangement: maybe put 1-4 GB on the chip, depending on its class and allow additional memory installed separately.   I'm sure there are good reasons Intel, AMD and the like are not doing this. What are these reasons? Is it that there's no room to spare on the chip? \AtEveryBibitem{\clearfield{Title}} in beamer? In my beamer presentation, I want to cite the reference without title. So, I tried:  \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage[   backend=bibtex8,   defernumbers=true,   sorting=none,   firstinits=true,   uniquename=init,   uniquelist=false,   refsegment=section,   citestyle=numeric ]{biblatex} \addbibresource{mini.bib} \AtEveryBibitem{\clearfield{Title}} \begin{document} \section{Start} \begin{frame}   first cite\footfullcite{Julie2006}   %\printbibliography \end{frame} \section{2nd} \begin{frame}   Second cite\footfullcite{gyof} \end{frame} \end{document}   with the mini.bib :  @article{gyof,   Author={BLJ},   Title={Some Title},   Journal={joural1},   volume={15},   pages={1337},   Year={1985} } @article{Julie2006,   Author={JBS},   Title={Some Other Title},   Journal={journal2},   volume={74},   pages={144411},   Year={2006} }   with \AtEveryBibitem{\clearfield{Title}} I was expecting no title will be produced, but thats not the case:   Is there any incompatibility between clearfield and footfullcite? Or I am just missing something? When adding image from Wikimedia Commons, automatically add author/license/link Many Stack Exchange questions and answers embed images from Wikimedia Commons. It is probably the most used image source here. Good news Thanks to their license, all images from Wikimedia Commons can be legally used inside Stack Exchange. Bad news The only requirement is to cite the author/license (), an easy task, but we are totally failing at it, only maybe 1% of Commons images used here are properly cited. That makes our use of these images illegal, and could expose Stack Exchange to various legal threats. Not my problem, you could say, but this is also important because , bringing Stack Exchange closer to closed-data sites like Yahoo! Answers or Experts-Exchange. Proposed solution When using the image addition widget, the widget should detect whether the image's URL has a *.wikimedia.org domain, and if yes:  (optional) Transfer the image to imgur, for perennity reasons. Retrieve the author name and license name from Commons (there is a very reliable API that gives that). Concatenate into a proper citation, maybe something like &quot;*Credit: [&quot; + author + &quot;](&quot; + commonsPageURL + &quot;) , [&quot; + license + &quot;](&quot; + licenseURL + &quot;)*&quot; Insert the citation at the same time as the image's MarkDown.  Benefits:  Remove a large part of Stack Exchange's copyright violations. Makes us a good citizen in the open data world. Remember what happens to sites who disregard ethics (Experts Exchange). Consistent citations. Zero added burden for the users. I've recently searched how I could get the application's directory in Java. I've finally found the answer but I've needed surprisingly long because searching for such a generic term isn't easy. I think it would be a good idea to compile a list of how to achieve this in multiple languages.  Feel free to up/downvote if you (don't) like the idea and please contribute if you like it.  Clarification:  There's a fine distinction between the directory that contains the executable file and the current working directory (given by pwd under Unix). I was originally interested in the former but feel free to post methods for determining the latter as well (clarifying which one you mean). How to declare a structure in a header that is to be used by multiple files in c? If I have a source.c file with a struct:  struct a {      int i;     struct b {         int j;     } };   How can this struct be used in another file (i.e. func.c)?  Should I create a new header file, declare the struct there and include that header in func.c?  Or should I define the whole struct in a header file and include that in both source.c and func.c?  How can the struct be declared extern in both files?  Should I typedef it? If so, how? When to use virtual destructors? If $a$, $b$, $c$ are the roots of $x^3-6x^2+3x+1=0$, find all possible values of $a^2b+b^2c+c^2a$ Let $a$, $b$, $c$ be the roots of $$x^3 - 6x^2 + 3x + 1 = 0$$ Find all possible values of $a^2 b + b^2 c + c^2 a$. Express all the possible values, in commas.  I've already tried to bash out all the roots, Vieta's Formula, and try to manipulate the equation to become easier to work with. However, Vieta's didn't get me anywhere, and I couldn't find a way to make the equation simpler or anything. Any hints to start this problem? Fix terminal after displaying a binary file More Generating Functions problems Significant predictors become non-significant in multiple logistic regression When I analyze my variables in two separate (univariate) logistic regression models, I get the following:  Predictor 1:    B= 1.049,    SE=.352,    Exp(B)=2.85,    95% CI=(1.43, 5.69),    p=.003    Constant:    B=-0.434,    SE=.217,    Exp(B)=0.65,                            p=.046  Predictor 2:    B= 1.379,    SE=.386,    Exp(B)=3.97,    95% CI=(1.86, 8.47),    p&lt;.001    Constant:    B=-0.447,    SE=.205,    Exp(B)=0.64,                            p=.029   but when I enter them into a single multiple logistic regression model, I get:  Predictor 1:    B= 0.556,    SE=.406,    Exp(B)=1.74,    95% CI=(0.79, 3.86),    p=.171 Predictor 2:    B= 1.094,    SE=.436,    Exp(B)=2.99,    95% CI=(1.27, 7.02),    p=.012    Constant:    B=-0.574,    SE=.227,    Exp(B)=0.56,                            p=.012   Both predictors are dichotomous (categorical). I have checked for multicollinearity.  I am not sure if I have given enough info, but I cannot understand why predictor 1 has gone from being significant to non-significant and why the odds ratios are so different in the multiple regression model. Can anyone provide a basic explanation of what is going on? Clarify or visualize the parameters involved for receiving the Curious badge $A^m\hookrightarrow A^n$ implies $m\leq n$ for a ring $A\neq 0$ I'm trying to prove that if $A\neq 0$ is a commutative ring and there is an injective $A$-module homomorphism $A^m\hookrightarrow A^n$ then $m\leq n$ must necessarily hold.    This is exercise 2.11 from Atiyah and MacDonald's Introduction to Commutative Algebra, but unfortunately all the solutions available online are either very sparse with regard to this question or seem to use (to my surprise) a generalized version of Cramer's rule. Is there perhaps some other "cleaner" approach to solving this problem? General integral to find resistance