Is there any condition that makes duplicates to be auto deleted at all? Or the duplicate status would protect of it:     If the question was closed more than 9 days ago, and ...         not closed as a duplicate   .....         ... it will be automatically deleted
I would like to clarify something that I don't think is clear in   The first automatic delete rule kicks in at 9 days for closed questions:     If the question was closed more than 9 days ago, and ...         was not closed as a duplicate   has a score of 0 or less   has no answers with a score > 0   some other criteria that don't matter right now...      Then, at 30 days, there's:     If the question is more than 30 days old, and ...         has −1 or lower score   has no answers   is not locked      This rule applies to both open and closed questions, but it doesn't mention the same exemption for duplicates.  I'm pretty sure that I've seen old, downvoted duplicates disappear on ServerFault (and that fits what the rule says), but I'm also sure I've seen lots of comments along the lines of  "duplicates aren't deleted."  So what I'm after is a clear statement from a power-that-be or a clear reference that says "duplicate questions fall under the same 30-day automatic deletion rule as any other question."  (or that they don't)  (Note: I realize this doesn't apply the stub left behind when a question is merged into another.  Those "stubs" are locked and are never deleted.)
Schengen visa validity start date My Chinese in-laws intend to visit us in one month from now. Their visa is valid from Nov 23rd. Would it be possible for them to take the airplane on November 22nd in China and arrive in Schengen area on November 23rd?  Or does the visa already have to be valid upon departure?  In our particular case, they still need to transfer in Beijing first. The actual flight to Schengen zone effectively only departs on the 23rd so I guess that should be completely fine then? Why does a query run slower in a Stored Procedure than in the Query window? Finding the distribution of sum of Lognormal Random Variables I am trying to find the distribution of sum of 2 lognormal random variables. I referred the literature available on Cross validated, Stack overflow and few papers before posting this.   I used convolution to find the distribution of sum of 2 lognormal rvs. The approximation works for difference. But, not for sum. I am getting a nasty kink at 0 in both CDF and PDF. I could not recognize the reason. With few tweaks, the shape of the distribution comes right. But, I am not sure what I was doing is right.   Can somebody guide me here? Isomorphism of quotient modules implies isomorphism of submodules? Let $A$ be a commutative ring, $M$ an $A$-module and $N_1, N_2$ two submodules of $M$.  If we have $M/N_1 \cong M/N_2$, does this imply $N_1 \cong N_2$?  This seems so trivial, but I just don't see a proof... Thanks! How to find a global minimum for $\frac{1}{2}x^tQx-b^tx$ Standard value of PATH variable Windows 10 After having poorly handled the PATH system variable (resulting in deletion), I'm now looking to reinstate the variable with the original value. I found answers like  about Windows 8 and below, but not for Windows 10. I guess values are virtually identical, but I'd like to know the exact string so I'm not missing anything. EDIT: Also, Regedit tree have changed and I'm not able to locate the variable Prove  that the function $\displaystyle f(x)=\frac{x}{x^2+1}$ is continuous at $x=-1$. You should give a proof that is directly based on the  definition of continuity.   I saw many similar questions on this website, but none of them gave me a satisfactory answer. I more or less understand how epsilon-delta proofs work but my problem lies more in the algebraic manipulations probably. So here's my "attempt".  Definition of continuity; for $f:A \to \mathbb{R}$     $$\forall \varepsilon &gt;0 \ \exists\delta&gt;0\ \forall x \forall x_0 \in A:|x-x_0|&lt;\delta \Rightarrow |f(x)-f(x_0)|&lt;\varepsilon$$   So from what I understand, the procedure for epsilon-delta proofs are as follows: 1. Plug the point of interest $x_0$ into $|f(x)-f(x_0)|&lt;\varepsilon$ 2. Write $x$ in terms of $\varepsilon$ 3. Then plug $x$ into $|x-x_0|&lt;\delta$ 4. Find $\delta$ in terms of $\varepsilon$. Done    At step 1, we have $\left|\dfrac{x}{x^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{2}\right|&lt;\varepsilon$. Step 2 is where I'm stuck because of the 2nd degree polynomial in the denominator. First, I did this: $\left|\dfrac{x}{x^2+1}\right|&lt;\left|\dfrac{x}{x^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{2}\right|&lt;\varepsilon$. Then, I wasn't too sure about what to do, I thought about getting rid of the "$1$", but that would screw up my inequality. I thought about factoring $x^2+1$, but it doesn't have any real roots. I tried inverting the fraction, but that led me to nowhere. And I've already exhausted the tools I have. How do I proceed?  Apparently, epsilon-delta proofs are the most basic building blocks of analysis. And I'm already failing, this is both embarrassing and depressing... Impact of changing instances' passwords As part of a security policy, the company I work for has given me the task of changing the sa's and SQL Server Agent service accounts' passwords for several instances.  What's the possible impact of doing this? Is there anything in particular I should watch out for? Is there any whitepaper, guide or even blog post about this kind of task? What kind of 'backup' plan should I have in place in case anything goes wrong?  Any guidance is appreciated. Would you be weightless at the center of the Earth? If you could travel to the center of the Earth (or any planet), would you be weightless there? "Above"/"below" before/after a noun I have seen sentences similar to the following:  (1) See the reference above. (2) See the reference below.  And,  (3) See the above reference.  But not,  (4) See the below reference.  Are all these forms acceptable? Which is/are preferred in formal writing? I seem to have screwed up something that allows you to inset evenly, I think I have tried every combination of settings in inset and pivot center and even is far from even.  I tried uninstalling and re installing blender 2.71 and get the same result.  The image attached is a simple default cube that I tried to inset evenly.  I have also attached the blend file link  help?? Is there a new auto-login feature? I dont know how to sort a list of SObject Case.  I have a List&lt;Case&gt; newCases which i iterate over in for cycle, where i save Cases to my new List&lt;Case&gt; casesList.  for (Case newCase : newCases) {             if(newCase.Case_Content__c == '111' &amp;&amp; newCase.Status == '24'){                 String cuid = newCase.CUID__c;                 cuidSet.add(cuid);                 casesList.add(newCase);                 casesList.sort(); //TODO sorting by CUID__c             }         }   What i need to do is, to sort this new list by field CUID__c. So the Cases with same CUID are together.  Thank you for any help :) The "I Get It" Reputation Problem I wrote a question about blocking certain characters in passwords. It became tremendously unpopular, and it seemed like everyone wanted to rain on my parade every day.  Eventually, I "got it," agreed completely with what people were saying to me, and just wanted to withdraw my question so that my reputation didn't slide even further downhill.  Unfortunately, the system is designed such that I can't withdraw my question or redeem myself. Instead, I just get daily reputation attacks. That's a terrible system, and it needs to be changed. I'm not that into dynamic programming languages but I've written my fair share of JavaScript code. I never really got my head around this prototype-based programming, does any one know how this works? var obj = new Object(); obj.prototype.test = function() { alert('Hello?'); }; var obj2 = new obj(); obj2.test();  I remember a lot discussion I had with people a while back (I'm not exactly sure what I'm doing) but as I understand it, there's no concept of a class. It's just an object, and instances of those objects are clones of the original, right? But what is the exact purpose of this &quot;.prototype&quot; property in JavaScript? How does it relate to instantiating objects? Update: correct way var obj = new Object(); // not a functional object obj.prototype.test = function() { alert('Hello?'); }; // this is wrong!  function MyObject() {} // a first class functional object MyObject.prototype.test = function() { alert('OK'); } // OK  Also these  really helped a lot. My character has a bite attack from his race.  What happens if he gains another bite attack from class abilities or spells?  Does the damage increase?  Can he make more than one attack?  Or is it simply that only the better version applies?  I would prefer answers from a Pathfinder context but 3.5e is also acceptable. Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/) is another process using it? I get this error when trying to use apt-get:  E: Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11 Resource temporarily unavailable) E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/) is another process using it?     How can I fix this? What dried food can I take across the American border from Canada? How do I use the 'scientific' mode in the Calculator? Atiyah-Macdonald, Exercise 5.4 I was having some trouble with the following exercise from Atiyah-Macdonald.     Let $A$ be a subring of $B$ such that $B$ is integral over $A$. Let $\mathfrak{n}$ be a maximal ideal of $B$ and let $\mathfrak{m}=\mathfrak{n} \cap A$ be the corresponding maximal ideal of $A$. Is $B_{\mathfrak{n}}$ integral over $A_{\mathfrak{m}}$?   The book gives a hint which serves as a counter-example. Consider the subring $k[x^{2}-1]$ of $k[x]$ where $k$ is a field, and let $\mathfrak{n}=(x-1)$. I am trying to show that $1/(x+1)$ could not be integral over $k[x^{2}-1]_{\mathfrak{n}^{c}}$.  I have understood why this situation serves as a counterexample. But I am essentially stuck at trying to draw a contradiction. A hint or any help would be great.