I've created a slider like so:  bpy.types.Scene.slider_value = bpy.props.FloatProperty(     default= 0,     min = -100,     max =  100,      )   In some case I need to go out over the previous  min and max values. It is possible to simply redefine the Float Property ?
When using an Int- or FloatProperty, is there any way of changing their min and max values dynamically?  I'm currently loading images on the fly and would like to limit a frame property to run from 0 to len(loaded_images) every time I call the loading operator. However, the property seems to be read-only and re-assigning gives the following error:  bpy.context.scene.project_props.bl_rna.properties['myIntProp'] = bpy.props.IntProperty(...) TypeError: bpy_prop_collection[key] = value: invalid, expected a StructRNA type or None, not a tuple   I understand the bpy.props constructor uses an intermediary tuple, but I'm not sure how to proceed. Is there any way around this?
Many researchers list out their submitted manuscripts on their website. Some specify the journal name, like     Smith J, Oliver J (under review) My awesome paper. Nature.   while others don't, like     Smith J, Oliver J (under review) My awesome paper.   One reason I can think of as to why some don't mention the journal name is that they may get embarrassed in the case where the current journal rejects the paper. Then, the "circle" will know this paper gets rejected from Nature first and then ends up in an inferior journal.  Besides this, are there any other considerations preventing people from mentioning to which journal they submit a paper to?  P.S.: I am asking because my advisor is a researcher who only mentions accepted  papers on his webpage. As a student hunting jobs, I feel it is advantageous for me to mention my submitted papers on my webpage. I hesitate to do so, as I worry I may make my advisor unhappy by announcing in which journal our papers are currently under review. A topological space $X$ is simply connected if it is pathwise connected and each closed path $u : I = [0,1] \to X$ is path homotopic to the constant path at $x_0 = u(0) = u(1)$. Recall that  A closed path $u$ is one with $u(0) = u(1)$. A closed path will also be called a loop and we write $\mathcal L'(X)$ for the set of all loops in $X$. If we want to be more precise, we say $u$ is a loop based at $x_0 \in X$ provided $x_0 = u(0) = u(1)$. By  $\mathcal L'(X,x_0)$ we denote the set of all loops in $X$ which are based at $x_0$. Also note that each constant path is a loop.  Two paths  $u, v : I \to X$ with the same initial point $x_0 = u(0) = v(0)$ and the same terminal point $x_1 = u(1) = v(1)$ are path homotopic, $u \simeq_p v$, if there exists a  homotopy $H : I \times I \to X$ such that $H(t,0) = u(t)$ and $H(t,1) = v(t)$ for all $t$ and $H(0,s) = x_0, H(1,s) = x_1$ for all $s$ (such a homotopy $H$ is stationary on the boundary $\partial I = \{0,1\}$; it is called a path homotopy). It is well-known that $\simeq_p$  is an equivalence relation on the set $\mathcal P(X)$ of all paths in $X$. Clearly $\simeq_p$ restricts to an equivalence relation on $\mathcal L'(X)$ and to an equivalence relation on each $\mathcal L'(X,x_0)$.  The set of equivalence classes $\mathcal L'(X,x_0)/\simeq_p$ is nothing else than the fundamental group $\pi_1(X,x_0)$ with base point $x_0$.   Question: Find a list, as complete as possible, of properties characterizing topological spaces which are simply connected. Each of these properties can then be taken as an alternative definition of simply connected. Note that many questions in this forum deal with aspects of simple connectedness. The answer to the present question will hopefully cover most of them. If the subject of a sentence is separated by "and/or", should the verb be pluralized, as with "and", or agree with the rightmost subject, as with "or"? For example:     His co-workers and/or his boss was at fault.   vs.     His co-workers and/or his boss were at fault. Are there any add-ons that will cause a browser to automatically refresh a page when a particular file changes on disk? I have noticed a couple of kinds of behavior that seem to crop up in the SO community, and it really seems to artificially boost reputation. There may not be a solution (or it may not be a problem!) but here are some thoughts.  The first is the fact that "celebrity" users, or users with lots of reputation, are treated significantly better than others. Take Joel Spolsky's most recent question:    It was closed, opened, closed, and re-opened. And the question has earned Joel - what - 1030 reputation 103 votes, and lots of reputation! Wow! I'm not saying that Joel's question is a bad one. But lets compare to other questions that one might consider to be in the same equivalence class - easily answerable, specific questions, short questions:   (5 votes)   (5 votes)  If you look at the , I can hardly find any which are specific technical questions. So that Joel's question was so upvoted could only mean that:   It was upvoted based on his celebrity People have been interpreting the questions as a sort of zen-like wakeup call, designed to get people talking and thinking about they way they vote.   I do not mean any disrespect toward Joel, and again, I think his question was a good one. This post isn't about Joel! But the boost in reputation did not (imho) mean "Joel is really good at programming, and he has earned my trust as someone knowledgeable about computers." It may be true that Joel is a proficient computer expert, but not based on the merit of that one question.  Which leads me to an example about myself. I recently gave  (130 reputation) to a question about PHP's image-creating libraries. I am very appreciative of the community's support for my answer - an answer which I believe was well-thought and that I put effort into.  At the same time I can't look someone and tell them, with a straight face, that my reputation is a great reflection of my computer-related knowledge. Billions of people on the net have created tutorials for PHP's GD image library - I just happened to be the person to post a few of them. Heck if I know why it got 13 votes! (oh, but please don't downvote it!!)  SO is built by the community - so the community absolutely gets to decide what questions are important, and how they choose to dispense reputation. But in practice, I feel like peoples' reputation would be much lower if the community were more discriminating about the way they voted.  So: am I totally off base here? Is this even something that can be corrected with a different reputation algorithm? Or am I the only one who sees this as a detriment to the SO community?  (And, to be completely clear, I do not intend for this to be an ad hominem, and I am not jealous about not having a higher reputation. But I do take reputation with a grain of salt, in part for these reasons, and I thought I'd bring it up! It is meta, after all!) How to get reflections from 3D to show up on real images On my headless NAS I have sdf1 (a flash-card) mounted as / while /home is mounted from lv00 (an LVM volume backed by a software RAID). To be able to access the machine when the RAID fails, I have a copy of my ssh public key, etc. in /home/foo/.ssh on the file-system from sdf1. To update the files that are hidden by the mounted /home I normally remount lv00 in /mnt/home, do what I have to do, and then move lv00 back in place. Is there a way to achieve this without unmounting /home? In the special relativistic action for a massive point particle, $$S=\int_{t_i}^{t_f}\mathcal {L}dt,$$ why is the Lagrangian $$\mathcal {L}=-E_o\gamma^{-1}$$ a negative number? I have a formula in a cell which counts the values in 2 other cells. Normally, after entering in the values in these 2 other cells, the formula cell updates automatically when Enter is pressed or when the cells are clicked out of.  However, for some reason, the value calculated by the formula does not update automatically. I am having to click on the formula bar, then I have to click enter for the formula cell to do its thing.  Why is this happening? Why does the speed of light in vacuum have no uncertainty? I could understand that the definition of a second wouldn't have an uncertainty when related to the transition of the Cs atom, so it doesn't have an error because it's an absolute reference and we measure other stuff using the physical definition of a second, like atomic clocks do.  But why doesn't the speed of light have uncertainty? Isn't the speed of light something that's measured physically?  Check out that . Extract substring in Bash Given a filename in the form someletters_12345_moreleters.ext, I want to extract the 5 digits and put them into a variable.  So to emphasize the point, I have a filename with x number of characters then a five digit sequence surrounded by a single underscore on either side then another set of x number of characters.  I want to take the 5 digit number and put that into a variable.  I am very interested in the number of different ways that this can be accomplished. Why is Python running my module when I import it, and how do I stop it? Proving an inequality involving the logarithm function: $\frac{1}{n+1} \leq \ln \left(1+\frac 1n\right) \leq \frac 1n$ The question is to prove the inequality $$\frac{1}{n+1} \leq \ln \left(1+\frac 1n\right) \leq \frac 1n\\\forall n \geq 1, n\in \mathbb N$$  I tried using Taylor expansion but couldn't figure out anything. Any ideas? Thanks. Why can't certain programs (like readlink) take input from a pipe? How to set the Identify Feature tool in QGIS 2.4? The Identify Results window does not appear when using the identify feature tool  in QGIS 2.4. I guess there's a check box somewhere I need to check/uncheck, but the settings of the tool changed compared to the previous version (see attached printscreen). Do I need visa for UK visit if I have a work permit for Ireland? Will my 320W PSU handle a Asus GTX 750Ti I've got a 320W PSU as far as I know and it's a Chinese PSU because I've seen the Chinese letters on it. I just had a question if I can upgrade my pc to Asus GTX 750Ti 2 GB OC.  My pc specs are:   4GB DDR3 RAM Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0 GHZ 250GB HDD Onboard graphics card Numbering in algorithmicx I have simple code:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{algorithm}  \usepackage{algpseudocode}  \begin{document}  \begin{algorithm}   \caption{Examples}\label{alg:Examples}   \begin{algorithmic}[1]   \State $X=45$   \State $X=45$   \State $X=45$   \State $X=45$   \State $X=45$    \end{algorithmic} \end{algorithm}          \end{document}     How to put a point after the number of the algorithm? I use chapters in report:  \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{report}  \usepackage{algorithm}  \usepackage{algpseudocode}  \begin{document}  \chapter{Chapter 1}  \begin{equation} X_2=4 \end{equation}  \begin{algorithm}   \caption{Examples}\label{alg:Examples}   \begin{algorithmic}[1]   \State $X=45$   \State $X=45$   \State $X=45$   \State $X=45$   \State $X=45$    \end{algorithmic} \end{algorithm}  \end{document}     How to change the numbering to take into account the chapters? Kill backgrounded SSH when shell exits Assuming I have a Czech license and break a minor law in Germany which incurs me a certain number of "violation points" (e.g. speeding), would those points be eventually transferred to my Czech license? I would obviously have to pay the fine (either on the spot or by mail), but it's not clear if EU countries exchange data on traffic points.  I would limit the scope to EU/EEA license holders driving within the EU/EEA, to avoid an overly broad question. Also assume that the person in question is resident in his home country and is only visiting other EU/EEA countries as a tourist.