I am writing a batch to call a .exe file which is made by C#. However, the C# program reads one of the parameters incorrectly.  Here's my code in the batch file:  start "" "example.exe" %cd% para1   However, when the %cd% (current directory of the batch file) path contains spaces, my C# exe will read the argument wrongly by shifting one argument.  Is there a way to set %cd% as one argument or other way to fix this problem?
In first.bat, I use  var5=C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64\ CALL scripts\vc64.bat %var5%   And in scripts\vc64.bat, I use  SET var6=%1vcvarsx86_amd64.bat CALL %var6%   But I get : 'C:\Programvcvarsx86_amd64.bat' is not internal or external command..... error.  If the path assigned to var5 has no space, then it is fine.  I tried several combination of quotations and %1vcvarsx86_amd64.bat, but no change.  How do I make it works with path with spaces?    To be more precise, suppose it is C:\a b c\  In first.bat:       SET var6=C:\a b c\  =====&gt;  '"C:\avcvarsx86_amd64.bat"' is not.....`      SET var6="C:\a b c\" ====&gt;   There should not be a b      SET var6=C:\a\ b\ c\ ====&gt;    Can't find the specified path      SET var6=C:\a b c\ + Using "%var6" ====&gt; There should not be a b     Update: Here is an example. Change a b to ab works.  call.bat in C:\  @ECHO OFF  SET var5=C:\a b\ CALL C:\1.bat "%var5%"  pause   1.bat in C:\  @ECHO OFF  SET var6=%~1Test.bat CALL %var6%  RMDIR /S C:\NoWorry   Test.bat in C:\a b Test.bat in C:\ab  @ECHO OFF  RMDIR /S C:\ThereIsNoSuchFolder
How do you teleport a certain player to spawn after they win a 1v1 I managed a KitPvP server in Minecraft and everything works fine except when players wants to duel each other. They get sent to a room where they will be dueling. The main problem is when the winner wins, I have no idea how to teleport them back to spawn. Tall curly brace I would like to put a tall (long) left curly bracket on the left side of the following:  \documentclass[12pt]{article}  \begin{document}  \noindent c: $\{$1, ..., n$\}$ $\rightarrow$ $\{$1, ..., n$\}$, such that  \hspace{20 mm}  \noindent c($a_i$) = $a_{i+1}$ for 1 $\le$ $i$ &lt; $l$  \hspace{20 mm}  \noindent c($a_l$) = $a_1$   \end{document}   Please let me know if you can help. Thanks! I was browsing PhD position offers in Europe on different websites and I was quite surprised to find that several offers contained sentences such as     University of X value equality and diversity. We strongly encourage women and BAME applicants for this position.    where BAME stands for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnicities; or     The research group aims to increase the number of women in scientific positions. Female candidates are therefore encouraged to apply.   Is it considered normal in the academic environment to discriminate between  candidates according to their race and/or gender for "egalitarian" reasons?   How is the choice of a candidate based on their gender and/or race considered "egalitarian"? Boy and girl paradox is driving me crazy I have a list of integers, List&lt;Integer&gt; and I'd like to convert all the integer objects into Strings, thus finishing up with a new List&lt;String&gt;.  Naturally, I could create a new List&lt;String&gt; and loop through the list calling String.valueOf() for each integer, but I was wondering if there was a better (read: more automatic) way of doing it? How should tiny $p$-values be reported? (and why does R put a minimum on 2.22e-16?) For some tests in R, there is a lower limit on the  calculations of $2.22 \cdot 10^{-16}$. I'm not sure why it's this number, if there is a good reason for it or if it's just arbitrary. A lot of other stats packages just go to 0.0001, so this is a much higher level of precision. But I haven't seen too many papers reporting $p &lt; 2.22\cdot 10^{-16}$ or $p = 2.22\cdot 10^{-16}$.   Is it a common/best practice to report this computed value or is it more typical to report something else (like p &lt; 0.000000000000001)? Entries I can safely exclude doing backups What is the best way to represent show and hide in icons? I have a web page that has a list of columns of information.  All columns have names and then some of the columns have items in them.   I want to have an icon to represent   Hide all empty columns Showing all columns   All of the icons i see for hide look like "delete" so i want to see if there are any representations of "hide" icons that don't look like delete.  And for "show" the only thing i see is an eye graphic which doesn't seem very intuitive to me.  Does anyone have any recommendations for good "hide" and "show" icons? Is it possible to load some package from a .sty file only if some option is selected?  (Naive approach \DeclareOption{something}{\RequirePackage{something}} doesn't work.) Behavior of $\|f\|_p$ when $p$ is near the endpoint of $I$ Given measure space $(X, \mu)$ and measurable function $f$. If $p \in (0, +\infty]$, below are the facts I know about $\Vert f \Vert_p$:  (log convex in $\frac 1 p$) $\forall p_1, p_2\in (0, +\infty] \text{ such that } p_1 &lt; p_2. \forall t \in(0, 1), \text{ let } \frac 1 p = \frac t {p_1} + \frac {1-t} {p_2}$, then $\Vert f \Vert_p \le \Vert f \Vert_{p_1}^t\Vert f \Vert_{p_2}^{1-t}$ ($0\cdot(+\infty)$ is defined to be $0$). (lower semi-continuity) $\forall p_0 \in (0, +\infty], \liminf_{p\to p_0}\Vert f\Vert_p \ge \Vert f \Vert_{p_0}$. If $0&lt;\mu(X) &lt; +\infty$, then $ \Vert f \Vert_p/\mu(X)^{\frac 1 p}$ is monotone increasing in $p$, combine it with (2) we get $\lim_{p\to p_0-}\Vert f\Vert_p = \Vert f \Vert_{p_0}$.  From (1) we know the set of $p$ such that $\Vert f \Vert_p &lt; +\infty$ is an interval $I$ (possibly empty or a singleton).  If $I \not\in a = \inf I$ and $a \neq 0$, from (2) we know $\lim_{p\to a+} \Vert f \Vert_p = +\infty$. If $I \not\in b = \sup I$, then $\lim_{p\to b-} \Vert f \Vert_p = +\infty$.  From (1) and the dominated convergence theorem we know that if $I \ni p_0 \neq \inf I$ and $p_0 &lt; +\infty$, then $\lim_{p\to p_0+} \Vert f \Vert_p = \Vert f \Vert_{p_0}$. If $I \ni p_0 \neq \sup I$, then $\lim_{p\to p_0-} \Vert f \Vert_p = \Vert f \Vert_{p_0}$.  If $I$ is nondegenerate and $+\infty \in I$, then $\lim_{p\to +\infty}\|f\|_p = \|f\|_{\infty}$.  If $\inf I = 0$, from (1) we know $\lim_{p\to 0+}\|f\|_p$ exists.   Question: How $\Vert f \Vert_p$ behaves when $p$ is the endpoint of $I$? To be more precise, assume $I$ is nonempty. Let $p_0 = \sup I$ (only right endpoint is considered for simplicity):  $p_0\in I$ or $p_0 \not\in I$? Can $I$ be a singleton? What if $p_0 = +\infty$? What if $0&lt;\mu(X) &lt; +\infty$?  Please also notify me if there is any mistake above. Find all $x$ such that $x^6 = (x+1)^6$. Find all $x$ such that $$x^6=(x+1)^6.$$   So far, I have found the real solution $x= -\frac{1}{2}$, and the complex solution $x = -\sqrt[3]{-1}$.  Are there more, and if so what/how would be the most efficient find all the solutions to this problem? I am struggling to find the rest of the solutions. I'm just going to throw this out there, but Google indexes Stack Overflow really quickly For example, I  after using Google to try to find an answer. I then turned back to Google and did a search for  and it was already the first result! Similar searches also put my question on the first page, usually in the top 5!  This is insanity. Did I get lucky and post just before an indexing? Is the popularity of SO leading to Google indexing extremely frequently? Or is Jeff using some kind of crazy SEO? Can the “while attuned” powers of Solarian stellar revelations be used while attuned to either mode, or only the matching one? Can [sic] be used to highlight a punctuational error?    In the sentence below, the bracketed sic would obviously denote that the punctuation preceding it was an error &mdash; that is, a semicolon should supplant the comma. Has anybody ever seen this usage, and would you support it?     The sun is high, [sic] put on some sunblock. Dealing with "Find out who's going to buy the croissants" On Stack Overflow at the moment, there is a popular question which is currently high in the Hot Questions feed:   So far it has been closed twice (once by the community and a moderator and once by a moderator alone) but re-opened twice by the community. It is clearly not a [so] Stack Overflow question. Reading between the lines, there could be a valid Software Engineering question there, but it would be a very basic one (at the fizz-buzz competency level) and looks more like a populist attempt to farm reputation than a serious question.  Worst of all, even though there are some interesting answers on this question, they are all going to be completely useless to future visitors to the site, since they will be completely undiscoverable. If the question were at least "What is the best fair distribution algorithm?" it would still be off-topic (primarily opinion based), but at least it might help someone once the topic falls off the Hot Questions feed.  Although this has turned into just a bit of fun, and I don't want to kill that, enough is enough. While this question is open, unlocked, and still seen as a valid question, it is setting a bad example for the whole Stack Exchange network.   questions like this, especially on the grandfather Stack Exchange site, devalue the work we are putting in on every other site by making it appear acceptable to re-open populist questions like this after two moderators have classified it as off-topic.  What should we do about this question?   Should it be left open? Power to the people? Closed and locked by a moderator? Migrated to another site? &hellip;or something else? How do I calculate areas of an area shapefile in square meters (m²) or in acres (ha)? I didn't find that functionality in the Vector Tools. Gray cone obscuring/clipping the 3D Viewport When looking at my objects in 3d view I'm seeing a gray cone that seems to be hiding other objects.   Can anyone help me turn this off and explain what it is please.  Screenshots attached. Which is more polite, "Would you" or "Could you"? Suppose you want to ask someone to do something, say to tell you the way to a station. Which is more polite, "Would you tell me the way to the station?" or "Could you tell me the way to the station?"? Totally ordering the power set of a well ordered set. Let's say I take a set $S$, where $S$ can be well ordered. From what I understand, one can use that well ordering to totally order $\mathscr{P}(S)$.  How does a body actually use the well ordering of $S$ to construct a total ordering of $\mathscr{P}(S)$?  Perhaps construct is too strong a word. Is there a way to prove that a total ordering of $\mathscr{P}(S)$ just exists, no need to explicitly state what it is, since that might be very difficult. Failed to allocate memory: 8