Please help - I want to merge and extend JavaScript objects in a way like in example below:  var objects = [{         id: 1,         fruits: "apple"     },{         id: 1,         fruits: "bannana"     },{         id: 2,         fruits: "tangerine"     },{         id: 2,         fruits: "plum"     }];   and to have results like:  var results = [{         id: 1,         fruits: ["apple", "bannana"]     },{         id: 2,         fruits: ["tangerine", "plum"]     }];   Is there any JavaScript, jQuery or easy custom solution to do it? It is different situation then here  or also $.expand() does not do here what I want. Thanks a lot!
I need to be able to merge two (very simple) JavaScript objects at runtime.  For example I'd like to:  var obj1 = { food: 'pizza', car: 'ford' } var obj2 = { animal: 'dog' }  obj1.merge(obj2);  //obj1 now has three properties: food, car, and animal   Does anyone have a script for this or know of a built in way to do this?  I do not need recursion, and I do not need to merge functions, just methods on flat objects.
Ubuntu server: Cannot setup dummy driver alsa (LXC container) // modprobe issue When should unions be used? Why do we need them? Typo in First Posts queue If you go to the First Posts review queue, and if there's an answer in the queue and if you hover with your mouse over "No Action Needed", then you get a tooltip "this answers seems to be valid":  But it should be "this answer seems to be valid". Mirror modifier is not working, no mirrored object? In 2018, Kyle Reese (a normal civilian who wasn't part of Resistance) was on the top in the hit list of Skynet. It means that Skynet of that time had information from future about Kyle Reese being father of future leader of human resistance. Right?  Why didn't Skynet kill Kyle Reese instantly after his detection kicking John Connor out of existence? Consider a particle on the ground. This particle is raised by a force of magnitude $mg$ to a height $h$ above the ground. At this point, the work done on the particle by the force is $mgh$, which is equal to the potential energy of the particle. But, during this period, the force of gravity also acts on the particle and is displaced by $h$, and so does a work of $-mgh$ on the particle. Shouldn't  the two cancel and no net work should be done on the particle?   If they don't cancel, then where did the energy that came from the work done by the force of gravity go? I downloaded Facade from the official website. After installing it, I tried to play it, but after the initial loading screen, the game vanished into just the outline of the window it was in. The sound works fine, and the hand still appears where the mouse is, and I can type responses, but there is no visual at all. I tried adjusting my computer to the resolution it mentions on the website but my computer's resolution won't go low enough. Is there a way to fix this or is the game not compatible with my pc?   Device Manager lists my graphics card as:     Mobile Intel (R) 45 Express Chipset Family (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM1.1) Universal type tranformer in Haskell Possible Duplicate:          I would like to know if when I'm writing about a "user" (in the broad sense), what do I use? Example: "from the user’s perspective, saving a file is very easy; ? only needs..."  What is correct: she, he, she or he, or they. How to line up the pieces at the coast near the shipwreck? In The Witness, I was walking along the coast, and I came upon this:    Now, since I've learned      that mazes can be embedded in the environment,   I see the puzzle here, but I just can't get the pieces to line up well enough.  Standing on the couch and walking all around it doesn't seem to get me a       functional maze.   Where do I need to stand to activate the puzzle successfully? How can I prove $\sup(A+B)=\sup A+\sup B$ if $A+B=\{a+b\mid a\in A, b\in B\}$ If $A,B$ non empty, upper bounded sets and $A+B=\{a+b\mid a\in A, b\in B\}$, how can I prove that $\sup(A+B)=\sup A+\sup B$? Is this correct?     That is a real cool answer.   I learned that that was incorrect, since "real" is an adjective which can describe a noun, e.g. "real answer" but it is not an adverb which can describe an adjective, "real cool". Instead you would have to say:     That is a really cool answer.   Since "really" is an adverb. Sum of a power series $n x^n$ What is the best term to describe the fact that most users have an initial dislike of any change to a UI even though it may really be net better over time?  Note: Question originally appeared How does the twitter bot work? Unsung hero dilemma This is partly related to  question.  I ran some queries on odata for my work on Stack Overflow, and I have found that my statistics are the following ones:  Accepted answers: 148 Zero score accepted answers: 36 Percentage of total: 24,3%  I probably fit the idea of the Unsong hero badge, as I've mostly been active in  questions, from when it only had around 200 Questions until now.  To get the badge I could either try to get one of my accepted answers downvoted once, that would give me a 25% accept rate; I could also delete 4 of my accepted answers with 1 or more score. That would also give me the badge, but this just seems wrong: You are actually encouraging me to either try to get a down-vote on a good answer, or delete good answers.  So, should I delete good answers to receive a gold badge?  Update: It's not that I care much if I get a badge or not, it's only a badge after all and not why I spend time on Stackoverflow anyways. But it's not ideal [read: problem] that I'm encouraged to delete accepted answers or try to get downvotes to achieve a badge. Blender python custom UI button run custom function? I have 3 accounts that I am deleting - however, several hours after the 24 hour (+ grace period - end about 4-5 hours ago), the countdown completed, but disappeared and the accounts are still there.   I would rather not go through another 24 hours, and would like to have these accounts deleted (and yes, I have thought about it and this decision is not up for discussion).  Currently, the accounts are still there.  Could this please be seen to? What are the shortcomings of the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE)? The  () is a common accuracy or error measure for time series or other predictions,  $$ \text{MAPE} = \frac{100}{n}\sum_{t=1}^n\frac{|A_t-F_t|}{A_t}\%,$$  where $A_t$ are actuals and $F_t$ corresponding forecasts or predictions.  The MAPE is a percentage, so we can easily compare it between series, and people can easily understand and interpret percentages.  However, I hear that the MAPE has drawbacks. I'd like to understand these drawbacks better so I can make an informed decision about whether to use the MAPE or some alternative like the MSE (), the MAE () or the MASE (). OL3 How to select features of a WMS layer