Book: dystopian future with games and sex changes I am trying to recall a book I read quite a while back.  The book revolved around people that no longer faced death I believe as, of I remember correctly, one of the main characters was well over one hundred years old. There was no longer a need for people to work so instead people played games and did as they pleased.   Another random detail was that sex changes were very common and were performed on a whim.
Looking for a short story about a man who is visiting a planet where you get your position/job through playing a game I read this story 8-15 years ago in German. I'm not sure but I think the book had 2 short, totally different stories in it.  The story was about a man who was sent (I think kinda forced to go) to a planet where he should play a game everyone on that planet plays. I think the goal was to beat their leader and conquer the world like this?  The better you are at the game, the higher is your position in the society. I remember that at the end he was playing against the leader and they had a long back and forth game, but I'm not sure who won.  They played the game on a different planet that had only one stripe of forest around the whole planet and a fire that goes around it. But thats only the location they were playing.  The man was chosen because he was the best player in every game if I remember correctly.  The game was a board like game where you have troops or armies that you move around. It was not an easy game everyone just could play.
Elements of $\mathbb Q(2^{1/3})$ When did 5 foot squares become standard in D&D? Passing list to viewparams variables in GeoServer SQL views? I have a script that does a number of different things, most of which do not require any special privileges. However, one specific section, which I have contained within a function, needs root privileges.  I don't wish to require the entire script to run as root, and I want to be able to call this function, with root privileges, from within the script. Prompting for a password if necessary isn't an issue since it is mostly interactive anyway. However, when I try to use sudo functionx, I get:  sudo: functionx: command not found   As I expected, export didn't make a difference. I'd like to be able to execute the function directly in the script rather than breaking it out and executing it as a separate script for a number of reasons.  Is there some way I can make my function "visible" to sudo without extracting it, finding the appropriate directory, and then executing it as a stand-alone script?  The function is about a page long itself and contains multiple strings, some double-quoted and some single-quoted. It is also dependent upon a menu function defined elsewhere in the main script.  I would only expect someone with sudo ANY to be able to run the function, as one of the things it does is change passwords. Rewriting a custom-post-type permalink with taxonomy term? i just finished updating my Macbook pro to macOS Catalina and after the installation finished i got this error message that keeps reappearing. i do not know or have a file named "qnmqkmkrqwfq" (i tried searching for it) and when i press show in finder or ok it disappears for a second and then pops up again for no reason and i am not trying to open any files or apps. i searched and the only solution i found was setting "Allow applications downloaded from: Anywhere" but it did not work. Please Help. Prove that for every $f$, a bilinear form, there exists a basis ${v_1,...,v_n}$ so that $f(v_i,v_j) = -f(v_j,v_i)$ I didn't want to bloat the title, i'll also add that the basis is in ${\mathbb{R}^n}$. This question seems kind of easy, but its from a test so I assume there is a catch here somewhere.   I tried to prove it by contradiction. Assume by contradiction that there exists no basis that satisfies the condition. But as known, every bilinear form can by identified by a matrix so that $A_{ij} = f(v_i,v_j)$. If there is no basis so $f(v_i,v_j) = -f(v_j,v_i)$ it means there is no skew-symmetric matrix which can identify a bilinear form over $\mathbb{R}$ which is obviously not true( I guess an example can be given here, I think ).  This proof just seems to simple to be true, but I can't seem to figure what could be wrong with it. I'll greatly appreciate any tips, thanks! What are Harry, Ginny, Ron and Hermione's professions? After the end of the Second Wizarding War Harry Potter later married Ginny Weasley, and the couple had three children of their own: two sons James Sirius, Albus Severus, and one daughter Lily Luna. What are Harry and Ginny's professions? I heard that Harry became an Auror, but what about Ginny, Ron, and Hermione? How do I print all lines of a file with duplicate values in a certain column Given a file like this:  1,768,12,46576457,7898 1,123,435,134,146 2,345,6756856,12312,1311 5,234,567465,12341,1341 1,3245,4356345,2442,13 9,423,2342,121,463 9,989,342,121,1212   I would like to list all rows (in bash terminal) such that the value in column 1 appears at least twice (in column 1). The result should be  1,768,12,46576457,7898 1,123,435,134,146 1,3245,4356345,2442,13 9,423,2342,121,463 9,989,342,121,1212 How to parse JSON in Java Is there a way to save selection by faces I'm trying to find a way to save selection faces, tried Vertex Group, the issue with Vertex Group is that it adds the faces that are marked by 4 vertices that are added to the Vertex Group, there are some cases were this doesn't apply, the image explains what I mean. So is there a way to save my selected faces, so I don't have to go through the whole process of reselecting them each time I need to do so? If you check the image, I didn't assign the hatched faces to the Vertex Group, still when I select the Vertex Group, they get selected, I understand that they got selected because the four boundary vertices are assigned to the Vertex Group, I need to save only face selection, not vertex selection. Explain why $E(X) = \int_0^\infty (1-F_X (t)) \, dt$ for every nonnegative random variable $X$ Let $X$ be a non-negative random variable and $F_{X}$ the corresponding CDF. Show,   $$E(X) = \int_0^\infty (1-F_X (t)) \, dt$$   when $X$ has : a) a discrete distribution, b) a continuous distribution.   I assumed that for the case of a continuous distribution, since $F_X (t) = \mathbb{P}(X\leq t)$, then $1-F_X (t) = 1- \mathbb{P}(X\leq t) = \mathbb{P}(X&gt;  t)$. Although how useful integrating that is, I really have no idea. The div containing tags for a question doesn't reflow, causing layout issues for questions with long/many tags This appears to be a css bug which (I think) has recently been introduced. It's most visible when viewing questions on Stack Exchange sites using mobile devices (the full site with responsiveness, not the mobile site) but can easily be reproduced by resizing a browser window on a question where the combined width of the tags is large. A couple of example questions show this behaviour:  On Meta Stack Overflow:   On Meta Stack Exchange:     Using the Meta Stack Overflow question to demonstrate (as the total width of the tags is larger):  At 1100px, the tags just about fit into their containing div.     At 800px, the tags appear on top of related questions:     At 450px, the tags are now wider than the view (the last tag is completely off the screen), causing scroll bars to appear:      This doesn't happen to lists of questions - the tags flow onto multiple lines:     Reproduced on: { Firefox 81, Chrome 84, Edge 84 } on Windows 10, and Chrome 85 on Android 11. Some websites and textbooks refer to $$\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}$$ as the correct formula for the uncertainty principle whereas other sources use the formula $$\Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar.$$ Question: Which one is correct and why?  The latter is used in the textbook "Physics II for Dummies" (German edition) for several examples and the author also derives that formula so I assume that this is not a typing error.  This is the mentioned derivation:     $\sin \theta = \frac{\lambda}{\Delta y}$      assuming $\theta$ is small:      $\tan \theta = \frac{\lambda}{\Delta y}$      de Broglie equation:      $\lambda = \frac{h}{p_x}$      $\Rightarrow \tan \theta \approx \frac{h}{p_x \cdot \Delta y}$      but also:      $\tan \theta = \frac{\Delta p_y}{p_x}$      equalize $\tan \theta$:      $\frac{h}{p_x \cdot \Delta y} \approx \frac{\Delta p_y}{p_x}$      $\Rightarrow \frac{h}{\Delta y} \approx \Delta p_y \Rightarrow \Delta p_y \Delta y \approx h$      $\Rightarrow \Delta p_y \Delta y \geq \frac{h}{2 \pi}$      $\Rightarrow \Delta p \Delta x \geq \frac{h}{2 \pi}$   So: Which one is correct and why? What are "Commited Memory", "Cached", "Paged", "Not-paged pool" & How They are Different with "In-Use Memory" Tool to manage and/or make available a list of my publications on the web? Any way to do DISTINCT ON? I'm trying to create a query like this:  SELECT DISTINCT ON (field1, field2) field1, field2, field3 FROM table1   But can't figure out how to get DISTINCT ON narrowed down to a few fields in Drupal like that. Calling $query-&gt;distinct() just seems to structure the query like this:  SELECT DISTINCT field1, field2, field3 FROM table1   I did figure out a hacky way to add what I want by adding an expression before I add any fields like this:  $query-&gt;addExpression('DISTINCT ON (field1, field2) field1', 'field1');   Which creates:  SELECT DISTINCT ON (field1, field2) field1 as field1, field2, field3 FROM table1   I'm looking for a better way to this ? How can I "grep" patterns across multiple lines? It seems I am misusing grep/egrep.   I was trying to search for strings in multiple line and could not find a match while I know that what I'm looking for should match. Originally I thought that my regexes were wrong but I eventually read that these tools operate per line (also my regexes were so trivial it could not be the issue).  So which tool would one use to search patterns across multiple lines? says that the number of different monomials of degree $M$ in $N$ variables is $$\frac{(M+N-1)!}{M!(N-1)!}\; .$$ Can anyone explain why this is true? Help with Axis Placement when extruding I am just learning Blender. I am going through the .  The first part was good. I was able to follow it. Coming from SketchUp, it is taking some adjustment. But I am getting it.  I am just starting the second video. At the beginning, the instructor selects the top of the mug to extrude it. When he presses the E key and Enter, the red, green blue axis moves to the center of those vertices. That does not happen when I press the E key and Enter.   This is only 1:30 into the video.  How can I get the axis in the middle of this circle of vertices?  The next step is to scale. I need the reference point in the middle of this circle of vertices. I cannot left-click accurately enough to position the axis/reference point.  I am using 2.69. The video uses 2.64.