I have a question about money.  We have different sorts of money such as blood money and I was wondering what stolen money is called.  Is there any kind of specific word for this type of money?
Money/Assets/Property that is earned through unethical sources is   called ?   Money that is earned through bad sources like corrupted politics, corrupted business, ransom money, stolen or theft money. What is such money called?  Is it bad money, black money. What is one particular name for it?
What does the "Current event" post notice mean? The recently introduced &quot;Current event&quot;  feels incomplete:  At the very least, it needs a period at the end to complete the sentence. Aside from that, what is a future visitor of a question supposed to take away from this notice? The &quot;citation needed&quot; text explains what expectations are placed on the question bearing the notice and invites action. Is the &quot;current event&quot; notice purely informational? What's the desired effect of adding it to a question? The current on-question notice is:  This post relates to a rapidly changing event.  In addition to answering those questions, I'm hoping we can work out a proposal for a wording change to make it more clear. I can't come up with anything to start with, since I don't quite get what the notice is supposed to achieve in the first place. How do I remove objects from an array in Java? What does "T" mean in C#? I have a VB background and I'm converting to C# for my new job.  I'm also trying to get better at .NET in general.  I've seen the keyword "T" used a lot in samples people post.  What does the "T" mean in C#?  For example:  public class SomeBase&lt;T&gt; where T : SomeBase&lt;T&gt;, new()   What does T do? Why would I want to use it? How can I put two figures side-by-side? Not two sub-figures, but two actual figures with separate "Fig.: bla bla" captions.  A figure is supposed to spread over the entire text width, but I have two figures which are narrow and long, and I need to save the space in order to withstand the pages limit. Mod shows up with OP background when viewing deleted comments Do reactions interrupt their triggers or not? In the Player's Handbook, it is pretty clear that reactions normally interrupt the thing that they are reacting to.    Xanathar's Guide to Everything, however, has explicitly changed all reactions to occurring after their triggers have finished resolving unless the ability specifies otherwise, and is reliant on that implicit assumption for several reaction abilities already.  This leads to contradictory interpretations of reactions that take implicit timing. How should this be resolved?   I'm particularly interested in how to resolve this in Adventurers League games, where players show up with perfectly legal characters reasonably expecting their abilities to work either way on account of owning or not owning XGE. Proof of the equality $\sum\limits_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{k^2}{2^k} = 6$ Show that for $k$ running over positive integers  $$ \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{k^2}{2^k}=6 .$$ We can use finite calculus. Assume $f:A\to A'$ is a function, $B\subset A'$, $C\subset A'$, and $f^{-1}(B\cap C)=\emptyset$  How can we see that $f^{-1}(B)\cap f^{-1}(C)=\emptyset$? Code Formating in Comments How to find real world Selenium projects Where can I find sample or real Selenium projects. All the material I can find on github and on internet are basic, and never intermediate or advanced.  How does a real Selenium project look in real life? How can I find sample code? There is a problem 3.3 in :     Ambiguities in the energy-momentum tensor:      (a) If you add a total derivative to Lagrangian ${\cal{L}} \rightarrow {\cal{L}} + \partial_\mu X^\mu$, how does the energy-momentum tensor change?      (b) Show that the total energy $Q = \int d^3x \; {\cal{T^{00}}}$ is invariant under such changes   Given the definition of energy-momentum tensor:  $$ {\cal{T}}^\mu{}_\nu = \sum_n \frac{\partial{\cal{L}}}{\partial \left( \partial_\mu \phi_n \right)} \partial_\nu \phi_n - g_{\mu\nu} {\cal{L}} $$  It changes as:  $$ \delta {\cal{T}}^\mu{}_\nu =  \sum_n \left( \partial_\rho \frac{\partial{X^\rho}}{\partial \left( \partial_\mu \phi_n \right)} \right) \partial_\nu \phi_n - g_{\mu\nu} {\partial_\rho X^\rho} $$  $T^{00}$ changes as:  $$ \delta {\cal{T}}^{00}= \sum_n \left( \partial_\rho \frac{\partial{X^\rho}}{\partial \dot{\phi_n}} \right) \dot{\phi_n} - \partial_\rho X^\rho $$   From this point I’m stuck. The first term doesn’t seem to disappear at all after integration over space, and the second disappears only partially:  $$ \int d^3x \; \dot{X^0} $$  So even if I’d have assumed that $X$ depends on position, and not on the fields - the total energy doesn’t seem to be invariant under it.  What is the best way to proceed forward with this? I have a video that was rotated 180° when recorded. Is it possible to correct this with FFmpeg? From a paper via Schneier on Security's  (emphasis mine):  In the case of AES-128, there is no known attack which is faster than the 2128 complexity of exhaustive search. However, AES-192 and AES-256 were recently shown to be breakable by attacks which require 2176 and 2119 time, respectively. While these complexities are much faster than exhaustive search, they are completely non-practical, and do not seem to pose any real threat to the security of AES-based systems. In this paper we describe several attacks which can break with practical complexity variants of AES-256 whose number of rounds are comparable to that of AES-128.  Is the implication here that AES-192 is stronger than AES-256? If so, in simple terms, how is that possible?  The attack exploits the fact that the key schedule for 256-bit version is pretty lousy -- something we pointed out in our 2000 paper -- but doesn't extend to AES with a 128-bit key.  Again, in simple terms, what does that mean? In practice, does this mean I should drop AES-256 in favor of its 128-bit counterpart, like Schneier recommends in the comments?  That being said, the key schedule for AES-256 is very poor. I would recommend that people use AES-128 and not AES-256. Conservation of energy and Doppler effect? Wire nut several wires together I need a wire nut large enough so that I can bundle seven 14 gauge neutral wires together. I am trying to splice it so I can connect it to my new smart wifi leviton light switch.  I don't know which wire nut size to buy.  The boxes say for example: minimum 2#14 gauge - maximum 2#10 gauge.   My question is, can you tell me which wing nut or brand or size to buy so I can group 7 neutral wires together? None of the sizing chart on the box says the exact words of "ok to bundle seven #14 gauge wires together.  Which one should I use? Idiomatic batch processing of text in Emacs? .toArray(new MyClass[0]) or .toArray(new MyClass[myList.size()])? Assuming I have an ArrayList  ArrayList&lt;MyClass&gt; myList;   And I want to call toArray, is there a performance reason to use  MyClass[] arr = myList.toArray(new MyClass[myList.size()]);   over  MyClass[] arr = myList.toArray(new MyClass[0]);   ?  I prefer the second style, since it's less verbose, and I assumed that the compiler will make sure the empty array doesn't really get created, but I've been wondering if that's true.  Of course, in 99% of the cases it doesn't make a difference one way or the other, but I'd like to keep a consistent style between my normal code and my optimized inner loops... How did Harry remove the Philosopher's Stone from the Mirror of Erised? ‘How did I get the Stone out of the Mirror?’   ‘Ah, now, I’m glad you asked me that. It was one of my more brilliant ideas, and between you and me, that’s saying something. You see, only one who wanted to find the Stone – find it, but not use it – would be able to get it, otherwise they’d just see themselves making gold or drinking Elixir of Life.’   Philosopher's Stone - page 217 - Bloomsbury - chapter seventeen, The Man With Two Faces - Harry talking with Dumbledore   Dumbledore doesn't directly answer Harry's question, but rather describes under what circumstances a person could collect the Philosopher's Stone from the mirror. Did Harry have to do anything to retrieve the stone, such as reach into the mirror and take it? If not, what kind of magic could have removed the stone from the mirror and put it into Harry's possession?  A canon-based answer is preferred, such as the books, interviews with J.K. Rowling, or info from Pottermore, but subjective answers within the spirit of canon are welcome. Rename all the files within a folder with prefix “Unix_” Rename all the files within a folder with prefix “Unix_” i.e. suppose a folder has two files a.txt and b.pdf than they both should be renamed from a single command to Unix_a.txt and Unix_b.pdf Feedback for The Loop - May 2020 May’s “The Loop” blog post was just posted, you can read it . A popular response last month to our post about how we receive, prioritize and implement feedback was a question around how this framework gets utilized in the practical sense. We thought that Dark Mode was a great feature to dig down into as it was so widely requested and anticipated.   We hope you enjoy this month’s post, please leave any questions or comments you have in this thread and we will respond ASAP.