I recently updated MikTeX on Windows 10, and now all my beamer slides are exported with 0 margin in the footer, so that the Author short name, short title etc is displayed all crammed up at the top of the footer. I am using CambridgeUS theme, but the problem is there in eg. Warsaw as well.  Minimal working example  \documentclass[10pt]{beamer} \usetheme{CambridgeUS}  \title[short title]{title}  \author[short author name]{author names}  \begin{document}  \begin{frame} Something text here \end{frame}  \end{document}   I've tried uninstalling and installing the beamer package to no avail, it looks like this when compiled:    Any help is greatly appreciated!
I just uninstalled TeX Live 2016 and installed TeX Live 2017 and I noticed that the vertical alignment of author and title in any beamer presentation with Warsaw theme has been disrupted. In this example the author is JESTIN and the title is Beamer Intro. How can I vertical center them?  Moreover, I just found the same bug in the beamer guide obtained writing texdoc beamer in the command prompt, in the part of a warsaw presentation.    Here is my code:  \documentclass{beamer}  \usetheme{warsaw}  \title[Beamer Intro]{Beamer - Introduction to \LaTeX{} presentation making} \author[JESTIN]{Jestin Joy}  \begin{document}  \begin{frame}   \titlepage \end{frame}  \end{document}
Close vote review audit flawed - fails without casting vote Having just  from any of the queues, it was reviewing close votes; however, this audit was flawed in that I didn't even cast a close vote.  Often I press the Close button to preview greater detail and sentiment of the closure, spawning the Why should this question be closed dialog box:    Especially for duplicates, where functionality is solely dependent on spawning this dialog.  From Closing > Duplicate, I can search or view selected duplicates:    Although, I realize general closure reasons are summarized on the page:    This question had 6-upvotes, but seemed very localized referencing subjective query is "taking too long" and even had a sqlfiddle link.  Maybe overly broad regarding performance tuning, the OP was posting like a forum with two answer posts to his own question  and  with one of those answers asking follow-up questions.    Wanting to gauge community response, current closure totals struck my curiosity.  So, I pressed the Close button and boom - oh, the humanity!  I failed, and didn't even cast a close vote.    Votes are not cast until a reason for closure is selected and Vote to Close is pressed.  Taking any review very seriously on this site, it only seems fair that my review quality is tested through actionable steps instead of clicking for more detailed information, leveraging the functional design of the close vote user interface.  Sure, it's complex to seed fake vote totals, and then there's controversy of mindless voting in the majority or people who simply cherry pick 4-vote questions.  Still though, it seems unfair I should hesitate to review further information of vote totals and duplicates before skipping due to the implementation of this audit. I've been wondering what makes the  such an important model. What I came up with:   It is a (relatively) simple system, making it a perfect example for physics students to learn principles of classical and quantum mechanics. The harmonic oscillator potential can be used as a model to approximate many physical phenomena quite well.   The first point is sort of meaningless though, I think the real reason is my second point. I'm looking for some materials to read about the different applications of the HO in different areas of physics. Suppress a biblatex field in only one of split bibliographies? I am aware of \clearfield, \clearlist etc (cf. ) - but I'm really not sure how to apply it in this context:  Say you have a split bibliography (i.e. several calls to \printbibliography in one document). How can you filter a specific field in a bibliography item - but only in one bibliography (i.e. only in one call to \printbibliography)?  For instance, in the MWE below (compiles with pdflatex test.tex &amp;&amp; biber test &amp;&amp; pdflatex test.tex &amp;&amp; pdflatex test.tex), let's say I'd like to filter urldate (i.e. urldate is not typeset) only in the first bibliography - but for the second one, the original/default behavior should be restored (i.e. urldate is typeset). How to I do that?  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{filecontents} \begin{filecontents*}{\jobname.bib} @online{ctan,   title        = {CTAN},   date         = 2006,   url          = {http://www.ctan.org},   subtitle     = {The Comprehensive TeX Archive Network},   urldate      = {2006-10-01},   label        = {CTAN},   langid       = {english},   langidopts   = {variant=american}, } @misc{google,   title        = {Google},   date         = 2007,   url          = {http://www.google.com},   urldate      = {2007-10-01}, } @misc{hotmail,   title        = {Hotmail},   date         = 2008,   url          = {http://www.hotmail.com},   urldate      = {2008-10-01}, } @misc{yahoo,   title        = {Yahoo},   date         = 2009,   url          = {http://www.yahoo.com},   urldate      = {2009-10-01}, } @misc{aol,   title        = {AOL},   date         = 2010,   url          = {http://www.aol.com},   urldate      = {2010-10-01}, } @misc{altavista,   title        = {AltaVista},   date         = 2011,   url          = {http://www.altavista.com},   urldate      = {2011-10-01}, } \end{filecontents*} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[backend=biber,defernumbers=true,style=ieee]{biblatex} \bibliography{\jobname}  \begin{document}  \section{Section 1} \begin{refsection}  Citing some stuff here: first \cite{ctan}, then \cite{google}, and finally \cite{hotmail}.  \printbibliography[sorting=none,section=\therefsection,resetnumbers=true]  \end{refsection}  \section{Section 2} \begin{refsection}  Citing some stuff here: first \cite{yahoo}, then \cite{aol}, and finally \cite{altavista}.  \printbibliography[sorting=none,section=\therefsection,resetnumbers=true]  \end{refsection}  \end{document}   Output: Intuition of the meaning of homology groups Find unique rows in numpy.array I am trying to evaluate the following sum. Here $x\in\mathbb{R^{+}}$. $$f(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(n-1)!}{\prod_{r=1}^{n}(x+r)}$$ At present I do not know how to proceed. Any hints are appreciated. Thanks. What if I offer a bounty and don't get any good answers? I have started a bounty:   It expires in 3 days. I don't have an appropriate answer to accept, and the only answer which it has gotten has no votes.  So am I going to simply lose 100 reputation without getting a satisfactory answer?  Or should I accept the lone inappropriate answer so that I will not lose my right to accept answers to any questions which I might ask in the future, which is what the bounty rules claim? It's common in C++ to name member variables with some kind of prefix to denote the fact that they're member variables, rather than local variables or parameters. If you've come from an MFC background, you'll probably use m_foo. I've also seen myFoo occasionally.  C# (or possibly just .NET) seems to recommend using just an underscore, as in _foo. Is this allowed by the C++ standard? Adding boolean yes/no field in ArcGIS Desktop? How does one add a field to an ArcGIS feature class with a boolean data type? That is an attribute where the allowed value is only one of a pair such as 1/0, Yes/No, On/Off, Present/Not-present, etc.   A boolean data type is not available in the Data Type pick-list. When should I use a struct rather than a class in C#? When should you use struct and not class in C#? My conceptual model is that structs are used in times when the item is merely a collection of value types.  A way to logically hold them all together into a cohesive whole.  I came across these rules :   A struct should represent a single value. A struct should have a memory footprint less than 16 bytes. A struct should not be changed after creation.   Do these rules work? What does a struct mean semantically? I have the following text:    A   Hello   world   B   Hello   world   C   Hello   world   I know that I can replace Hello by Hi using sed:  sed 's/Hello/Hi/g' -i test   but this replace each Hello with Hi:    A   Hi   world   B   Hi   world   C   Hi   world   what I really want is to replace only the Hello after B:    A   Hello   world   B   Hi   world   C   Hello   world   so I have tried this:  sed 's/"B\nHello"/"B\nHi"/g' -i test   but nothing happened, How can I do this?  Note: There are some white-spaces on the beginning of each line of the file. structs in C with initial values Product Notation for Multiplication in Reverse Order Is there a standard notation for multiplication in reverse order? For example consider the problem  $$x_{k+1} = A_k x_k$$  where $x_i \in \mathbb{R}^n$ and $A_i \in M_n(\mathbb{R})$, ($i=0,1,2,\dots$) without any further assumptions on $A_i$. The solution to this problem is  $$x_k = A_{k-1} \dots A_1 A_0 x_0$$  Obviously, writing  $$x_k = \prod_{i=0}^{k-1} A_i x_0$$  is wrong because of the multiplication order. But I'm also unconfortable to use  $$x_k = \prod_{i=k-1}^{0} A_i x_0$$  as the notation suggests that we need to increment $i$, not decrement it. Also, one may need to write $\prod_{i=k}^{m} A_i$. Then, we need to explicitly state $m &lt; k$ to imply ordering.  I can always write the open form but as similar products frequently occur in calculations in my work I want to express them in a more compact way. The question is, is there a standard and nice notation to do so? There are some suggestions in , but I think none of them are "nice enough" to work with.  I came up with the notation  $$x_k = \coprod_{i=k-1}^{0} A_i x_0$$  to imply decrementing $i$ rather than increment it, but I don't know if it is used in somewhere else or there is a standard notation. How can energy be useful when it is 'abstract'? Show that $Kf(x,y)=\int_0^1k(x,y) f(y) \,dy\\$ is linear and continuous Let $k:[0,1]\times[0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ continuous and $K:C[0,1]\rightarrow C[0,1]$, given by $Kf(x,y)=\int_0^1k(x,y) f(y) \,dy\\$. Prove that $K$ is continuous. I try to see continuity in $0$, but i can't find $\delta$. Jquery - change event firing on page load Why should one use EM vs. say, Gradient Descent with MLE? Mathematically, it's often seen that expressions and algorithms for Expectation Maximization (EM) are often simpler for mixed models, yet it seems that almost everything (if not everything) that can be solved with EM can also be solved with MLE (by, say, the Newton-Raphson method, for expressions that are not closed).  In literature, though, it seems that many favour EM over other methods (including minimization of the LL by, say, gradient descent); is it because of its simplicity in these models? Or is it for other reasons? Delete Duplicate Rows? I have a column in an Excel spreadsheet with several hundred entries, and some of these entries are duplicated.  I would like to remove all duplicate entries from the column so that each entry remaining is unique.   Is there a way to accomplish this automatically? Is my expansion of the state $| x \rangle$ correct? Following , I would like to know what exactly it means for a tag to be marked as blocked (formerly blacklisted) on a Stack Exchange site.  Does it mean I can't use that tag on my question? What are the reasons for blocking a tag? Who can block tags? Why am I being prompted to remove a tag from a question I'm editing?