i have problem. My header look like this:  \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} \usepackage[polish,english]{babel} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{times} \usepackage{enumerate}   And when i want add tekst this diﬀerent, i'm getting message :     ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:ﬁ not set up for use with   LaTeX.See the inputenc package documentation for explanation.Type H    for immediate help.... \item as a ﬁ   What is the reason of this problem? Thanks for help.
Is there anyway to find and remove ligatures from tex file? Sometimes when I copy/paste a text to Winedt, it shows perfect, but when I compile it to Pdf, some issues appear, e.g. finding becomes nding.  I am wondering if there is any way to search and find these characters?  Here is an example file (needs utf8 encoding).  \documentclass{article} \begin{document} ﬁ \end{document}
I'm sure its a simple question and I suppose it was asked many times, but I just can't figure it out from other answers, sorry.  I use recent versions of PostgreSQL and MySQL. I have 2 tables:  CREATE TABLE authors (     id INT,     name VARCHAR )  CREATE TABLE posts (     id INT,     author_id INT,     text VARCHAR,     date DATE )   I need to select one most recent post for each author. Thanks!  UPDATE  Thanks, both links provide answers to my question with some exception. All the following queries give the same result (which one is the most efficient btw?) The issue is when there is more than one post from the same author with the same date. Then the returned result set contains all such posts. How should I modify these queries to return exactly one post per author?  SELECT p1.* FROM posts p1 LEFT JOIN posts p2 ON p1.author_id = p2.author_id AND p1.date &lt; p2.date WHERE p2.author_id IS NULL ORDER BY p1.author_id;  SELECT p1.*  FROM posts p1 INNER JOIN (   SELECT author_id, MAX(date) AS max_date   FROM posts   GROUP BY author_id) p2   ON p1.author_id = p2.author_id AND p1.date = p2.max_date ORDER BY p1.author_id;  SELECT * FROM posts p1 WHERE date = (SELECT MAX(p2.date)               FROM posts p2               WHERE p1.author_id = p2.author_id) ORDER BY author_id;  SELECT * FROM (     SELECT author_id, MAX(date) date     FROM posts GROUP BY author_id ) p1 INNER JOIN posts p2 USING (author_id, date) ORDER BY author_id; Check if the application is already installed In this case what is correct?        Keep Tom and I updated.      or         Keep Tom and me updated.      I understand that me is an object pronoun. And therefore I feel the second option is correct.  Especially, because I would say "Keep him updated" and also "Keep me updated". Instead of "Keep he updated" or "Keep I updated". But something about saying "Keep him and me updated" feels wrong.  However I am not sure, because several people have told me that in this case I is the correct option because it is being used in conjunction with a name (Tom) and not a pronoun. Is that correct? Apparent Violation of Newton's $3^{\text{rd}}$ Law and the Conservation of Momentum (and Angular Momentum) For a Pair of Charged Particles Consider a system of the two identical positive point charges situated in free space (isolated from the influence of any other external fields) as shown in the attached diagram. Particle $1$ is at $(a,a,0)$ and particle $2$ is at $(0,a,0)$. Their velocities, at the considered instant of time, are as shown in the diagram ($\mathbf{v}_1$ along the $+x$ axis, $\mathbf{v}_2$ along the $+z$ axis).    Now, by applying the Biot-Savart law, we find that the magnetic field due to particle $2$ at the position of particle $1$ is along $+y$ axis, which means that the force acting on particle $1$ is along $+z$ axis according to Fleming’s left-hand rule. A similar analysis shows that there is no magnetic force on particle $2$ as the magnetic field of particle $1$ should vanish at positions (relative to particle $1$) located along its velocity vector.  Now, if we observe the net torque on the system of two particles about the $y$ axis then it is non-zero and is directed along the $-y$ axis. Here, there are no external forces or torques acting on the isolated two-particle system, and yet the net torque, as well as the net force on the particles, are nonzero. Why? Also, Newton's third law of motion seems to be broken in this scenario. Why?    Edit $1$  I have come to know from the responses that the electromagnetic field itself takes away some momentum and angular momentum about the considered axis. However, I think that if I consider only two charged particles as my system then the Abraham-Lorentz force can be assumed to be acting upon the system, and that is sufficient to make sure that we have considered the momentum being carried away by the electromagnetic field itself.   Even after considering the action of the Abraham-Lorentz force for the two-particle system, the scenario breaks both Newton's third law and the conservation of linear and angular momentum. This is because the Abraham Lorentz forces do not exactly counterbalance the force and the torques, on the two-particle system under consideration, due to the magnetic field.    Edit $2$  The previous edit was a result of confusion and misunderstanding on my part. The force associated with the momentum carried away by the electromagnetic field as a result of the electromagnetic interaction described in the question is the Lorentz force itself which simply doesn't obey the third law of motion. The Abraham-Lorentz force is a different story. It is associated with the momentum carried away by the radiation emitted by the accelerated charged particles. This is an additional force apart from the Lorentz force and corresponds to an additional carriage of momentum by the electromagnetic field. The momentum carried away by the electromagnetic field in correspondence with the Lorentz force doesn't correspond to radiation. Equivalence principle question I understand the  as "The physics in a freely-falling small laboratory is that of special relativity (SR)." But I'm not quite sure why this is equivalent to "One cannot tell whether a laboratory on Earth is not actually in a rocket accelerating at 1 g". How can I force SQL Server Management Studio to update the IntelliSense cache? IntelliSense in SSMS isn't updating unless I shut it down and restart. I've tried disconnecting from the server and reconnecting while the SSMS session is active, but that isn't working.  Steps to recreate:    Create a table  Select something from that table SSMS displays squiggly red lines under it with the tip "invalid object name" Execute the query   How can I force IntelliSense to update without restarting SSMS? Finding real roots of negative numbers (for example, $\sqrt[3]{-8}$) I've read through the elementary proof of why there exists a solution $x$ to $x^2\equiv -1\pmod p$ iff $p\equiv 1 \pmod 4$ for $p$ an odd prime. Is there a group theory generalization for this fact as well? Cannot install Ubuntu in VirtualBox due to "this kernel requires an x86-64 CPU, but only detects an i686 CPU, unable to boot" error I was trying to install Ubuntu 12.04 in VirtualBox 4.2.12r84980. I see    this kernel requires an x86-64 CPU, but only detects an i686 CPU, unable to boot   But I am using a 64 bit Windows 8, and trying same .iso for trying Ubuntu. Then what is the problem? In a standing wave, how does energy travel past a node?  It should just get reflected. Assume the case of first overtone and you strike the string at a place. How will energy distribute itself?  If it distributes over the whole string, then how is it the wave traveled past a node?  Basically the problem is a standing wave has been set up in the string . Now you strike the string at a place, and this creates a new pulse. Now this pulse will travel past the next node in the string (not the boundary) or will it reflect off even that node and remain confined to a particular region of the string? Show that $\partial_\nu T^{\mu\nu} = - j_\nu F^{\mu\nu}$ In a theoretical physics homework problem, I have to show the following: $$\partial_\nu T^{\mu\nu} = - j_\nu F^{\mu\nu}$$  Where $T$ is the Energy-Momentum-Tensor, $j$ the generalized current and $F$ the Field-Tensor. We use the $g$ for the metric tensor, I think in English the $\eta$ is more common.  I know the following relationships:   Current and magnetic potential with Lorenz gauge condition: $$\mathop\Box A^\mu = \mu_0 j^\mu$$ Energy-Momentum-Tensor: $$T^{\mu\nu} = \frac1{\mu_0} g^{\mu\alpha} F_{\alpha\beta} F^{\beta\nu} + \frac1{4\mu_0} g^{\mu\nu} F_{\kappa\lambda} F^{\kappa\lambda}$$ Field-Tensor: $$F^{\mu\nu} = 2 \partial^{[\mu} A^{\nu]} = \partial^{\mu} A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu} A^{\mu}$$ d'Alembert operator: $$\mathop\Box = \partial_\mu \partial^\mu$$ Bianchi identity: $$\partial^{[\mu} F^{\nu\alpha]} = 0$$   So far I have set all the definitions into the formula I have to show, but I only end up a lot of terms from antisymmetrisation and product rule. I also drew all what I have in , but I still cannot see how to tackle this problem.  Could somebody please give me a hint into the right direction? What's wrong if I fit the auto-regression with OLS? I am doing auto-regress by usual linear regression package. e.g.  $y_t=φx+ε_t$ with $x =y_{t-1}$  My reason is that, Auto-regression does assumes iid errors, same for linear regression. Linear Regression doesn't have assumption on independent variables. What's different is merely that the independent variables is replaced with lagged dependent variable y.  But I see AR always is fitted by specific methods, I am afraid I'm doing wrong. Is my model any good, based on the diagnostic metric ($R^2$/ AUC/ accuracy/ RMSE etc.) value? How many attacks can a fighter with two-weapon fighting make at 5th level? I made a series of outdoor shots with Nikon D5000, with the 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6G VR kit lens.  On some shots, I see in the EXIF info f/11, and in another shot, f/9.    How can that be, that the f-number is greater than 5.6, when that's listed as the maximum in the lens spec? Why does println(array) have strange output? ("[Ljava.lang.String;@3e25a5") I have been there first time.   The reason why I think this might not be natural is that the expression "first time" seems to describe "past". You do not use the present perfect with an adverb indicating "past", in my understanding.  However, I feel the phrase below is not that funny.     This is the first time that I have been there.   I am wondering about the relationship between "the first time" and "I have been there". "That" could behave like a relative adverb. If that is the case, the antecedent of "that"—"the first time"—is shared with the following clause: "I have been there". Then, is it OK to say "I have been there first time"?  By the way, Google searches for "" and " in the UK domain show just 33 hits for the first phrase and 10 hits for the second. Sometimes it's hard to search for older versions of macOS &amp; OS X  on the App Store.  This is an attempt to provide the canonical QA for this issue, as per the Meta QA -  I expect it to be modified over time to hopefully become a complete information resource.  How can I get any older version of a Mac OS to be able to run as a VM, or to reinstall on my Mac? Link to the recommended job is broken in the mobile apps The link to the recommended job in the app brings you to a page with the text: Not Found    Looking at the link it seems like after changing the URL structure in Stack Overflow Jobs they have not been updated in the apps.  For the job in the screenshot this is the used URL in the app:    The correct URL is: I'm messing around with python for the first time.  I'm making my own changes to the interface, just because..  How can I move the text inside the buttons down and to the left? The left image is what I have now and the right one it's what I want to do..  Please have in mind that I have zero python knowledge. But I'm willing to learn..