.searchbar { display: block; border: 1px solid red }  .searchbar input[type=text] { float: left; width: 80%; box-sizing: border-box; border-radius: 30px; display: inline-block; outline: none; border: 3px solid black; padding: 16px; margin: 6px; vertical-align: middle; }  .searchbar button { width: 16%; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; padding: 16px; margin: 6px; border:none; vertical-align: middle; } &lt;div class = 'searchbar'&gt; &lt;form&gt; &lt;input type = 'text' placeholder = 'Click here'&gt; &lt;button type = 'button'&gt;Search&lt;/button&gt; &lt;/form&gt; &lt;/div&gt;    In order to align both elements vertically, I used vertical-align: middle and, according to , it works with inline-level elements. Despite setting their display values to inline-block, it doesn't seem to work . As you may have already noticed, &lt;input&gt; isn't aligned to the center as if it had not effect. In fact, if I were to delete vertical-align: middle, it would look the same. Also, it seems that &lt;input&gt; bottom margin isn't working. However, it should since it's a block-level element.
I have a div with two images and an h1. All of them need to be vertically aligned within the div, next to each other. One of the images needs to be absolute positioned within the div. What is the CSS needed for this to work on all common browsers? &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot;&gt;   &lt;img src=&quot;..&quot; &gt;&lt;/img&gt;   &lt;h1&gt;testing...&lt;/h1&gt;   &lt;img src=&quot;...&quot;&gt;&lt;/img&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
Why the rows returns by "explain" is not equal to count()? Many of the Ringbearers (particularly those who carried it longer) used the word "precious" to describe it. Isildur described it as:     "But for my part I will risk no hurt to this thing: of all the works of Sauron the only fair. It is precious to me, though I buy it with great pain."   Bilbo himself used it at least once, when arguing with Gandalf about leaving it behind when he was leaving Bag End (this exchange and the lines were different in the movie, but the word is still there):     "Well, if you want my ring yourself, say so!" cried Bilbo. "But you won’t get it. I won’t give my precious away, I tell you."   And Gollum used it incredibly frequently, almost as if it was the ring's name. It was even his last words:     "Precious, precious, precious!" Gollum cried. "My Precious! O my Precious!"   So my question: Why "Precious"? It wasn't part of the inscription. It wasn't part of the poem that included the inscription. Was it somehow part of Sauron's crafting spell? Did Tolkien ever indicate why the Ringbearers would use that word in particular, other than that it sounded good? How to cut holes in an object using another object? I'm trying to model a M16 but I have a problem with cutting the holes on top of the handguard of the weapon.     As you can see in the picture above, I have tried to cut holes into the handguard (The marked mesh in edit mode) with the object above it (The multiple cylinder one). But I simply can't. I have tried the Boolean modifier but the handguard just disappears and doesn't make any holes. Same with the Knife Project thing. Nothing works, it won't make a hole in it. I also installed the BoolTool 0.2 but that didn't work either...The multiple cylinder object goes invisible and doesn't make any cuts.    In the picture above you can see how I want the cuts to be made. I want the holes of the multiple cylinder object to be there on the handguard when I take it away. Nothing works. The 3 methods I tried with worked on other parts of this model but not on the handguard. It should be the handguards mesh's fault but I can do nothing about it. Is there any solution? Opposite of "straight talk" What is the opposite for the straight talk idiom? How do I best call the activity when someone makes a very long preamble before he says what he wants? Wikipedia introduces the vector product for two vectors $\vec a$ and  $\vec b$ as $$ \vec a \times\vec b=(\| \vec a\| \|\vec b\|\sin\Theta)\vec n $$ It then mentions that $\vec n$ is the vector normal to the plane made by $\vec a$ and  $\vec b$, implying that $\vec a$ and  $\vec b$ are 3D vectors. Wikipedia mentions something about a 7D cross product, but I'm not going to pretend I understand that.  My idea, which remains unconfirmed with any source, is that a cross product can be thought of a vector which is orthogonal to all vectors which you are crossing.  If, and that's a big IF, this is right over all dimensions, we know that for a set of $n-1$ $n$-dimensional vectors, there exists a vector which is orthogonal to all of them.  The magnitude would have something to do with the area/volume/hypervolume/etc. made by the vectors we are crossing.  Am I right to guess that this multidimensional aspect of cross vectors exists or is that last part utter rubbish? When does $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_n = 0$ imply $\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} a_n$ converges? This is just a general question. I know the opposite statement is always true. I'm just asking when the converse holds. I know that the converse is not true in some cases, such as for harmonic series. What additional restrictions are needed to make this statement true? Floating point precision while using Python's max() If a function returns no value, with a valid return type, is it okay to for the compiler to return garbage? I'm trying to understand an algorithm that tries to map points from a lie group to its lie algebra using the exponential map. The background is the representation of 3d coordinate transformations as a lie group.  I can imagine, how one can map points on a manifold (eg a sphere) to the tangent space (tangent plane) at some point x on the sphere. I can imagine to create the tangent space by computing derivatives at that point x. But I cannot imagine how the exponential of some matrix is giving me that tangent space?  How can I envision the exponential of a matrix? Is there some picture or analogy I can use as intuition? I am trying to create a map in both Leaflet and OpenLayers 3 which displays the  layer EMAP8 from the WMS http://wms.nlsc.gov.tw/wms. I can't get it to work. I can open the layer in QGIS, but when I try to use it in Leaflet like this:  var overlay_taiwanemapen0 = L.tileLayer.wms('http://wms.nlsc.gov.tw/wms', {     layers: 'EMAP8',     format: 'image/png',     transparent: true,     continuousWorld : true, });   or in OpenLayers 3 like this:  var lyr_taiwanemapen = new ol.layer.Tile({     source: new ol.source.TileWMS(({         url: "http://wms.nlsc.gov.tw/wms",         params: {"LAYERS": "EMAP8", "TILED": "true"},     })),     title: "taiwane-map(en)", });   I get nothing displayed. I can see layers being requested, and data being transferred, but nothing on the map.  What am I doing wrong? Is it possible to include the tag-wiki associations in the Data Explorer? To do this would require two additional columns in the postTags table that associate a tag wiki excerpt and a tag wiki to their tag.  The tag wiki data is already available in the posts table. But there is no way to associate this data with its tags. The SEDE schema lacks the required columns to link the tag excerpt and the tag wiki to the tags table.  Additionally, the postTypes table only lists three posts types. It makes no mention of tag-wiki and tag excerpt posts. Perhaps the postypes table can be updated to reflect the additional post types? How do I remove gapps from CyanogenMod I installed CyanogenMod 11 on my HTC One with CyanogenMod Installer. So I got also the google Apps (gapps) on my device. But I need a CM11 without gapps. I did then the following without success:   copy cm-11-20140308-SNAPSHOT-M4-m7.zip to /sdcard/ boot to recovery mode -> recovery -> ClockworkMod Recovery v6.0.4.6: "wipe data/factory reset" "install zip" choosing the zip-file "reboot system now"  So I got a new CM11 but with gapps still installed.  What should I do in addition to "wipe data/factory reset" to get rid of this apps? Sudo comes up with an error, cannot run anything as root For some reason, when I try to run any programs (I am trying to run a rootkit hunter: rkhunter) as root on the command line with sudo like this:  sudo rkhunter   Then I get this message:  You must be the root user to run this program   and then I get these lines:  sudo: error in /etc/sudo.conf, line 0 while loading plugin 'sudoers_policy' sudo: /usr/lib/sudo/sudoers.so must only be writable by owner sudo: fatal error, unable to load plugins   I try typing in just sudo but that comes up with the same three errors as above. Also in /etc/ sudo.conf does not exist.  I cannot run any other programs as root through sudo. It was also strange because I could run as root a day ago. I would like it to work.  Just so you know, I am the only user of this computer, and the administrator, running Lubuntu 14.04.1. Is there a quick way to get to the Control Panel in Windows 8? Obviously in all previous versions of Windows you could simply click START and then select "Control Panel" to get to it, but on Windows 8 there is no such option.  Is there an easy way to quickly get to it without having to press WIN, type "Control Panel", and then press Enter? Convergence of Ratio Test implies Convergence of the Root Test How do you breed animals? What are the biggest pros and cons of  vs ? How do I bake chocolate chip cookies like Subway? I want a chocolate chip cookie like the ones Subway has. Those cookies have a smooth top and chewy texture.  I have a recipe for 3/4 cup fat, 0.5 cup sugar 0,5 cup brown sugar, 3/4 cup flour, 1 egg, 2 tsp extract. I get a semi stiff dough, but also an airy cookie, not as dense like Subway. I use room temperature margarine.  I have tried to bake cookies with 2 eggs and with 1 egg, but they always come out wrinkly on top, not as stiff. Is it possible that using an egg and a yolk would work? (But wouldn't that waste a lot of whites if that's how they do it?)  I think as part of this I want a stiff dough, that'll leave the bowl clean, to minimize spread and keep the tops from getting wrinkly as stiffness will keep the the cookies from expanding and contracting. Is that true? If so, I'm afraid that if I add more flour to stiffen the dough will make the cookies cakey - is that the case? How would I avoid that? Replace Line Breaks in a String C# How can I replace Line Breaks within a string in C#? How to control object's path follow speed based on its position