I try to develop a super basic template language, and I have a problem with RegEx, I try to convert this:  # Tilte ## Subtitle ### Subsubtitle Lorem ipsum b(dolor) sit i(amet), consectetur u(adipisicing) elit   to this:  &lt;h1&gt;Title&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;h2&gt;Subtilte&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Subsubtitle&lt;/h3&gt; Lorem ipsum &lt;strong&gt;dolor&lt;/strong&gt; sit &lt;i&gt;amet&lt;/i&gt;, consectetur &lt;u&gt;adipisicing&lt;/u&gt; elit   But I get this:  &lt;h1&gt;&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;h2&gt;TEma 4&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Subtitle&lt;/h3&gt; Lorem ipsum &lt;strong&gt;Subsubtitle&lt;/strong&gt; sit i(amet), consectetur u(adipisicing) elit   Here is my code:  input = ARGV[0]  regExes = {      h1: [/^# (.*)$/, "&lt;h1&gt;", "&lt;/h1&gt;"],     h2: [/^## (.*)$/, "&lt;h2&gt;", "&lt;/h2&gt;"],     h3: [/^### (.*)$/, "&lt;h3&gt;", "&lt;/h3&gt;"],     b: [/b\((.*)\)/, "&lt;strong&gt;", "&lt;/strong&gt;"],  }  strFile = File.read input  puts "\t", strFile  for index, regEx  in regExes      actualNode = regExes[index]     print actualNode, "\n"     strFile.gsub! actualNode[0], "#{actualNode[1]}#{$1}#{actualNode[2]}"  end  puts strFile   What should I do?
I have this gigantic ugly string: J0000000: Transaction A0001401 started on 8/22/2008 9:49:29 AM J0000010: Project name: E:\foo.pf J0000011: Job name: MBiek Direct Mail Test J0000020: Document 1 - Completed successfully  I'm trying to extract pieces from it using regex. In this case, I want to grab everything after Project Name up to the part where it says J0000011: (the 11 is going to be a different number every time). Here's the regex I've been playing with: Project name:\s+(.*)\s+J[0-9]{7}:  The problem is that it doesn't stop until it hits the J0000020: at the end. How do I make the regex stop at the first occurrence of J[0-9]{7}?
Outlining in Blender? I am currently working on converting my logo vectored as a SVG to a 3D model using the 2.72 version. I ran into a problem with my logo because it contains a black stroke and an orange stroke (see both images below), but currently all I have is the interior color of each shape. I was wondering whether or not there was a simple way to add in these strokes, and how exactly to go about creating the strokes. Thank you in advance community! Traveling to Ireland with German National visa I am a student at the University of Stuttgart, Germany and I have a 1 year national visa for Germany and now as my holidays are ahead I was looking if my German visa is sufficient to travel to Ireland for some 10 days. I am a citizen of Republic of Armenia. New passport and entrance Schengen I am from Brazil and travel a lot in Schengen countries. Under the rules of Schengen visa (3 months stay in a 6 months period). In my passport are the entrance and exit stamps, also to chec the days I stay in Schengen.  I need a new passport and will get this in Brazil. So in this new passport are NOT the stamps. Does this mean I start new with the Schengen visa rule? I seems like. The new passport is empty. Or do I miss something? It would be great because I am almost on my 90 days stay in the period of 180 days. If $\int_0^x f \ dm$ is zero everywhere then $f$ is zero almost everywhere I have been thinking on and off about a problem for some time now. It is inspired by an exam problem which I solved but I wanted to find an alternative solution. The object was to prove that some sequence of functions converges weakly to zero in $L^2$.   I managed to show (with some help) that the limit $f$ (of a subsequence) satisfies $\int_0^x f \ dm=0$ for all $x&gt;0 $. From this I want to conclude that $f=0$ a.e. I can do this with the fundamental theorem of calculus in its Lebesgue version but there ought to be a more elementary proof.  Can someone here help me out? default permissions for /var/www I was trying to open a file and write to it with PHP at /var/wwwfolder but it wasn't working so I did  sudo chmod 777 /var/www   now I want to set the permissions for /var/www to the default. what are the default permissions for /var/www? Experimental observation of matter/antimatter in the universe Ordinary matter and antimatter have the same physical properties when it comes to, for example, spectroscopy. Hydrogen and antihydrogen atoms produce the same spectroscopy when excited, and adsorb the same frequencies. The charge does not make a difference in the potential (regardless if it's generated by a proton or an antiproton) nor in how the positron behaves in this potential (being its mass equal to the mass of an electron)  How can astronomy evaluate if a far galaxy is made of matter or antimatter, given that from the spectroscopy point of view, they behave in the same way? In other words, how do we know that an asymmetry exists between matter and antimatter in the universe? Why is rm allowed to delete a file under ownership of a different user? From the post  I understand that rm just needs write permission on directory to remove the file. But I find it hard to digest the behaviour where we can easily delete a file who owner and group different.  I tried the following  mtk : my username abc : created a new user  $ ls -l file -rw-rw-r-- 1 mtk mtk       0 Aug 31 15:40 file $ sudo chown abc file $ sudo chgrp abc file $ ls -l file -rw-rw-r-- 1 abc abc       0 Aug 31 15:40 file $ rm file $ ls -l file &lt;deleted&gt;   I was thinking this shouldn't have been allowed. A user should be able to delete only files under his ownership? Can someone shed light on why this is permitted? and what is the way to avoid this? I can think only restricting the write permission of the parent directory to dis-allow surprised deletes of file. Why doesn't bash expand this variable when I prefix a command with a "one time variable assignment" If I run this bash command and prefix the statement, so that the variable fruit should exist, but only for the duration of this command:  $ fruit=apple echo $fruit  $   The result is an empty line. why?  To quote a comment from wildcard on :     parameter expansion is done by the shell, and the "fruit" variable is   not a shell variable; it's only an environment variable within the   environment of the "echo" command   An environment variable is still a variable, so surely this should still be available to the echo command? How to remove the top horizontal bar in fancyhdr? When using fancyhdr, how do you remove the top horizontal rule?  I do not want a header at all, just a footer.  This is what I do now:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \pagestyle{fancy}  \lfoot{text} \cfoot{text 2} \rfoot{text 3}  \begin{document} Foo Bar \end{document} Is it appropriate to put a comma before "which"? On Server Fault, we were discussing  in chat. There are non-native speakers in the chat and somehow we got on the topic of grammar and proper use of commas.   The sentence of interest:     I have just got a new Ubuntu LAMP VPS server, which I am trying to configure.   Some people thought that the comma was superfluous. Others did not.   When is it appropriate for a comma to preceed the word which, and is the example sentence above correct?    Also, before you vote to close this question as a dupe of , please consider the differences between the two questions and ignore the similarity of the titles. The OP's example sentence was restructured in that question instead of addressing the proper use of commas. property not working with getter AND setter Meaning of different Orders of Derivative I have been trying to analyse the meaning of higher order derivatives and their geometrical significance.  Given a function $f(x)$ what are the unique geometric interpretation of its higher orders?   $f'(x)$ - slope (rate of change of x w.r.t y) $f''(x)$ - convexity / concavity of $f(x)$ based on $sign(f''(x))$ $f'''(x)$ - increasing / decreasing slope of $f'(x)$ $f''''(x)$ - ?? ... $f^n(x)$ - ??   I apologize if this question is rudimentary. How do I create a PPA? How do I create my own custom PPA to share with the Ubuntu community? I am trying to create my own custom package set and I would really like to share it with the community. In the Wikipedia article , it says     After Newtonian gravitation was found to be inconsistent with special relativity, . . .   I don't see how Newtonian gravitation itself is inconsistent with special relativity.  After all, Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation is completley analogous to Coulomb's Law, so it would seem that, if there were an analogous "gravitational magnetic field", one could formulate a theory of gravitation in exact analogy with Maxwell's Theory of Electromagnetism, and of course, this would automatically be consistent with Special Relativity.  What about this approach to gravitation does not work?  The only problem I could see with this is the lack of evidence for a "gravitational magnetic field".  That being said, gravity is "weak" as it is, and my guess is that it would be extremely difficult to set up an experiment in which a massive body were moving fast enough for this "magnetic field effect" to be obsevable.  EDIT:  As has been pointed out to me in the answers, Newton itself is inconsistent with SR.  Similarly, however, so is Coulomb's Law, yet, electromagnetism is still consistent with SR.  Thus, how do we know that it is not the case that Newton's Law is the special "static" case of a more general gravitomagnetic theory exactly analogous to Maxwell's Theory:  Let $\mathbf{G}$ be the gravitation field, let $\rho$ be the mass density, and $\mathbf{J}$ be the mass current density, let $\gamma _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{4\pi \gamma _0}=G$, the Universal Gravitation Constant, let $\nu _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{\gamma _0\nu _0}}=c$, and suppose there exists a field $\mathbf{M}$, the gravitomagnetic field, so that the following equations hold: $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\rho}{\gamma _0} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{M}=0 $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{M}=\nu _0\mathbf{J}+\gamma _0\nu _0\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t} $$ where theses fields would produce on a mass $m$ moving with velocity $\mathbf{v}$ in our inertial frame the Lorentz force $\mathbf{F}=m\left( \mathbf{G}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{M}\right)$.  This theory would automatically be consistent with SR and would reduce to Newton's Law of Gravitation for the case of gravitostatics:  $\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t}=\mathbf{J}=0$.  (To be clear, you can't just set the time derivatives equal to $\mathbf{0}$ as it seems I have done.  Upon doing so, you obtain the corresponding static theory, which is technically incorrect (as you can easily see because it won't be relativistically invariant), but is nevertheless often a useful approximation.)  My question can thus be phrased as:  without appealing directly to GR, what is wrong with this theory? I am curious if it is possible to have a VPS that has data on it that is not readable by the hosting provider, but is still usable on the VPS.  Obviously there are some things that you could do to prevent them from reading anything...   You could change all the passwords, including root. But then, they could still use some alternate boot to reset the password, or they could just mount the disk another way. So, you could encrypt the disk or at least some of the contents on the disk. But then it seems that if you decrypted the content, they could still "peer in" to see what you were doing at the console, because after all, the virtualization platform should allow this. And even if you could stop that, it seems they could just read the RAM of the VPS directly.   Of course, the VPS can store data on it and as long as the key is not on the VPS and the data is never decrypted there, then the host cannot get the data.  But it seems to me that if any point the data on the VPS is decrypted...for use on the VPS...then the hosting provider can get the data.  So, my two questions are:   Is this correct? Is it true that there is no way to 100% secure data on a VPS from a host from seeing it, while keeping it accessable by the VPS? If it is possible to make it 100% secure, then how? If it is not possible, then what is the closest you can get to hiding data from the web host? A closed form of $\int_0^1\frac{\ln\ln\left({1}/{x}\right)}{x^2-x+1}\mathrm dx$ This integral has been bugging me since yesterday:     $$\int_0^1\frac{\ln\ln\left({1}/{x}\right)}{x^2-x+1}\mathrm dx$$   I've tried substitution $y={1}/{x}$ and $e^y={1}/{x}$, but those didn't help much. Wolfram Alpha gives me result: $-0.67172$. Could anyone here please help me to obtain the closed form of the integral preferably (if possible) with elementary ways (high school methods)? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Use second argument for optional first argument if not provided in macro I'm trying to construct a command with one optional and one mandatory argument and I'd like the default if the optional argument is not provided to be #2.   Why does this not work?  (error: Illegal parameter number ...)  \documentclass{article}  \newcommand{\mycommand}[2][#2]{\label{#1}#2} \begin{document} \mycommand{mytext} \end{document}   And what would be a way around it?   EDIT: For clarification of my specific use case: I'm trying to define a command that passes a variable on as an option to an environment along those lines, where myenv can have options like optionone=X or optiontwo=Y so the default for the optional #1 should be optionone=#2 (not literally #2).   \newcommand{\mycommand}[2][optionone=#2]{\begin{myenv}[#1]\input{#2}\end{myenv}}   Maybe there's generally a better approach?   (The environment definition I'm using is from .) Why does sudo change the PATH? Why is integration the inverse of differentiation How does the new Tie-Breaker work? In Clash of Clans there was an update on 9/16 adding a Tie-breaker into the wars, can anybody explain in detail how this mechanism works?