Issue with winter bash 404 error page There is an issue with a particular link's 404 error page in the   For the invalid URLs we get the response as generic 404 error page.  Few examples:      But for the  URL, it returns the plain text 404, instead of the 404 error page.  Screenshot for reference:      Credits to:
WinterBash site exhibits some strange 404 behavior I was poking around winterba.sh for secret hats and I figured there may be a secret hat linked to a URL so I decided to look at some different URLs and got plenty of 404s but, some pages throw different 404s than others. Why?  Example:  throws the classic "Page Not Found" winterbash style... but  just has the text "404"  ( used to throw just the text "404" but since that has changed)  Still happening at 2016 with .
Can you enter the Schengen area with a UK visa? Do internal forces cause change in velocity? How do I handle partially correct edits in the Suggested Edits review queue? Contradicting Instructions While going through the suggested edits review queue, one sometimes stumbles upon partially useful edits like . Trying to follow the instructions listed in the descriptions doesn't lead to a conclusive answer. Considering our example:   Approve edits that clearly improve the post ↳ No, not *clearly* Improve Edit when you can make additional improvements to the post ↳ I most definitively can Reject and Edit to replace an ineffective edit with your own substantive changes ↳ It is ineffective in the sense that it made the post worse overall (imho) Reject edits that fail to improve the post or that make it worse ↳ Like the last option: yes Skip if you are not sure and want to go to the next suggested edit ↳ Well, yes. But that is really why I am here, asking this question   Reasoning about the remaining Choices This leaves us with three choices: Improve Edit, Reject and Edit and Reject (the last one slightly modified):  Improve Edit  + Acknowledges that some things in the edit where correct - Learning effect for author might vanish, as the improvement might get overlooked - Can't leave a custom message for edit author (except in comments, which pollutes the thread) - Doesn't trigger the system which &quot;punishes&quot; users who repeatedly have their edits rejected - Rewards the edit author with reputation for a poor edit   Reject and Edit  + Clearly shows the author that there were problems with the edit - Still can't leave a custom message explaining the problems of the original post. - One has to partially redo parts of the edit that have just been rejected, which might feel unjust to the original editor   Reject with a custom note and come back immediately to make a good Edit  + Clearly shows the author that there were problems with the edit + Possibility to leave an explanation as to what was wrong with the edit - One still has to redo parts of the edit that has just been rejected - Seems to be a weird workaround for Reject and Edit   Something else?   Each of the three options come with their distinct advantages/disadvantages making it non trivial to decide which one to pick.  Or does the answer simply depend on the quality of the edit? Like:  Improve Edit for subjectively slightly positive edits Reject and Edit (Or Reject and Edit) for subjectively slightly negative edits Meaning of symbols $\vdash$ and $ \models$ I'm confused about the use of symbols $\vdash$ and  $ \models$. Reading the answers to  and  I see that:  the turnstile symbol $ \vdash $ denotes syntactic implication. Then $ S \vdash \psi$ means that $\psi$ can be derived from the formulae in $S$  the double turnstile $ \models $, denotes semantic implication. Then the notation $A \models B$ means simply that B is true in every model in which A is true.  So I understand that, e.g., $(ZFC+ A) \vdash B$ means that $A \Rightarrow B$ is a theorem in ZFC and, in this sense $\vdash$ is a mathematical symbol for a theorem. While $(ZFC+ A) \models B$ means that $ B$ is true in every model of ZFC in which $A$ is true, and, in this sense $\models$ is not a mathematical but a metamathematical symbol.  I understand correctly? And those are the only uses of the two symbols? Given a command that changes its behaviour when its output is going to a terminal (e.g. produce coloured output), how can that output be redirected in a pipeline while preserving the changed behaviour?  There must be a utility for that, which I am not aware of.  Some commands, like grep --color=always, have option flags to force the behaviour, but the question is how to work around programs that rely solely on testing their output file descriptor.  If it matters, my shell is bash on Linux. For $D$ a GCD domain , let $a,b,x \in D \setminus \{0\}$ , then is it true that $\gcd (ax,bx)=x \cdot \gcd (a,b)$? Using a naked black hole as a mirror? When can we interchange “who/which" and "that”? So far I thought the words who and that are usually interchangeable:   There is the man who saw me.  There is the man that saw me.    Both sentences seem fine, who can be replaced with that. But in the following examples:   This is the man to whom I spoke.  This is the man to that I spoke.    The #2 sounds odd, which is why I don’t think it might be correct. The same observation for the words which and that, while   This is the ball which we used today.  This is the ball that we used today.    Seem to be in order and which can be replaced with that. But in the following examples the #2 sounds odd again.   This is the ball with which I scored.  This is the ball with that I scored.    I wonder if there’s any rule regarding the interchangeability of the above mentioned words. How is Selenium RC different from Selenium Web driver and some good pointers for a naive beginner to learn to scripting please? Thanks! I installed a nightly or unstable build of a custom ROM and now my phone doesn't work I'd like to estimate the correlation between:  An ordinal variable: subjects are asked to rate their preference for 6 types of fruit on a 1-5 scale (ranging from very disgusting to very tasty) On average subjects use only 3 points of the scale.  A continuous variable: the same subjects are asked to quickly identify these fruits, which results in an mean accuracy for the 6 fruits.   Is Spearman rho the best method to analyze these data and/or are there other good methods I could consider? Space $\mathcal{L}^p(X, \Sigma, \mu)$ is separable iff $(\Sigma, \rho_\Delta)$ is separable How can I implement a comprehensive apa-style citation and bibliography I am really new to LaTeX and I need a comprehensive solution for my Thesis  I have this problem since two days and I couldn't find any solution in any other post.  I work with BibDesk on Mac  And I used Packages apacite and natbib  @article{Ha89, Author = {Peter M. Haas}, Date-Added = {2017-02-06 21:15:57 +0000}, Date-Modified = {2017-02-06 21:45:06 +0000}, Journal = {International Organization}, Lastchecked = {03/02/2010 12:54}, Number = {3}, Pages = {377-403}, Publisher = {Peter Haas}, Read = {0}, Title = {Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control}, Urldate = { http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706652}, Volume = {43}, Year = {1989}}   this is a stripped version of my document:  \documentclass[11pt, oneside]{article}  \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage[margin=1in, left=1.5in, includefoot]{geometry}   \usepackage{ragged2e} % REFERENCE PREAMBLE %\usepackage{url} \usepackage{apacite} \usepackage{natbib} %\usepackage{biblatex-apa}                                                   % Bullet preamble \renewcommand{\labelitemi}{$\bullet$} \renewcommand{\labelitemii}{$\diamond$} \renewcommand{\labelitemiii}{$\circ$} % graphics preamble \usepackage{graphicx}   %Allows you to import images \usepackage{float}      %Allows for control of float positions %HEADER AND FOOTER STUFF \usepackage{fancyhdr}  \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage{graphicx}        \usepackage{amssymb} %Zeilenabstand 1,5 wenn aktiviert  \usepackage{setspace}\makeatletter\newcommand{\MSonehalfspacing}{\setstretch{1.44}\ifcase \@ptsize \relax\setstretch {1.448}\or\setstretch {1.399}\or\setstretch {1.433}\fi}\newcommand{\MSdoublespacing}{\setstretch {1.92}\ifcase \@ptsize \relax\setstretch {1.936}\or\setstretch {1.866}\or\setstretch{1.902}\fi}\makeatother\MSonehalfspacing %Zeilenabstand Code fertig \usepackage[hidelinks]{hyperref}   %allows for clickable reference %                       BEGIN OF DOCUMENT \citeA{source} %                       REFERENCES  \renewcommand{\sectionmark}[1]{\markright{\thesection\ #1}} \fancyhf{} \rhead{\fancyplain{}{Identifying the Regime}} \lhead{\fancyplain{}{List of References}} \cfoot{\fancyplain{}{\thepage}}  \setlength\bibitemsep{1.9\itemsep} \bibliography{/User/Desktop/Thesis/references/mybib.bib}                   \bibliographystyle{apa} \addcontentsline{toc}{section {\numberline{}References}                                                       \end{document}   I would like to have the bibliography entry include a retrieved from    I tried to deactivate hyperref – as suggested in another post – but it didn't work. I also tried to activate and deactivate natbib and apacite as well.   I would really appreciate any help... Multi-Question Questions: How Best to Handle Them? Sometimes I come across a question on SO that is actually a number of questions all in one. If these &quot;sub-questions&quot; are closely related, it's not a problem. But if they are only weakly related (or not at all) it gets ugly. I'm now (ironically or hypocritically) going to ask a few questions of my own for the community to respond to:  Do you consider a question made up of a number of weakly-related sub-questions &quot;inappropriate&quot;? Why or why not? How many is too many sub-questions? What do you think is the best way to deal with such questions?  As an example,  I had some discussion about with another user. I will add a more complete version of my response in an answer below, but in short I felt that this question should be closed and many of the questions asked separately. Includegraphics maximum width With \includegraphics I can give the width of the resulting image (which would be scaled).   How can I give a maximum width of the image? That is, if the original is smaller than X, I'd like to keep the smaller image, if the image is larger than X, then the image width should be X.  Using pdflatex/graphicx. How do they film the mirror scenes in movies? How do you end with a single quote followed by a double quote? I have a paragraph as follows:  ``This is a quote. `Here is a quote within a quote.'''   But the formatting works out to be a double quote (") followed by a single quote (') instead of the other way around. How can I solve this problem? How to align the camera in a solved motion tracked scene? I have been having an issue with my floor plane and object when using a solved camera after tracking some footage. I get a solve error of between 0.05 and 0.4 on my solves which is good and not the issue I've been having. However when I go to orient the camera I will snap it to an origin and adjust the scale. The plane and object are not aligned, but could be fixed if I could just rotate around them (much like in PF Track). I would think the pivot point for the camera, if I have it locked to view, would be the origin (where my plane and object are), but it seems to be just some arbitrary point out in space which makes manually fixing the alignment very difficult. I'm wondering if there is any way to fix this so the pivot point is in fact in the center, or if there are any other suggestions to go about this problem. The code below compiles, but has different behavior for the char type than for the int types.  In particular     cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;int8&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;    cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;uint8&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;    cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;char&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;   result in 3 instantiations of templates for three types: int8, uint8 and char. What gives?  The same is not true for ints: int and uint32 which result in the same template instantiation, and signed int another.  The reason seems to be that C++ sees char, signed char and unsigned char as three different types. Whereas int is the same as a signed int. Is this right or am I missing something?  #include &lt;iostream&gt;  using namespace std;  typedef   signed char       int8; typedef unsigned char      uint8; typedef   signed short      int16; typedef unsigned short     uint16; typedef   signed int        int32; typedef unsigned int       uint32; typedef   signed long long  int64; typedef unsigned long long uint64;  struct TrueType {}; struct FalseType {};  template &lt;typename T&gt; struct isX {    typedef typename T::ikIsX ikIsX; };   // This  int==int32 is ambiguous //template &lt;&gt;            struct isX&lt;int  &gt;    { typedef FalseType ikIsX; };  // Fails template &lt;&gt;            struct isX&lt;int32  &gt;  { typedef FalseType ikIsX; }; template &lt;&gt;            struct isX&lt;uint32 &gt;  { typedef FalseType ikIsX; };   // Whay isn't this ambiguous? char==int8 template &lt;&gt;            struct isX&lt;char  &gt;  { typedef FalseType ikIsX; }; template &lt;&gt;            struct isX&lt;int8  &gt;  { typedef FalseType ikIsX; }; template &lt;&gt;            struct isX&lt;uint8 &gt;  { typedef FalseType ikIsX; };   template &lt;typename T&gt; bool getIsTrue(); template &lt;&gt;           bool getIsTrue&lt;TrueType&gt;() { return true; } template &lt;&gt;           bool getIsTrue&lt;FalseType&gt;() { return false; }  int main(int, char **t ) {    cout &lt;&lt; sizeof(int8) &lt;&lt; endl;  // 1    cout &lt;&lt; sizeof(uint8) &lt;&lt; endl; // 1    cout &lt;&lt; sizeof(char) &lt;&lt; endl;  // 1     cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;int8&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;    cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;uint8&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;    cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;char&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;     cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;int32&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;    cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;uint32&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;    cout &lt;&lt; getIsTrue&lt; isX&lt;int&gt;::ikIsX  &gt;() &lt;&lt; endl;  }   I'm using g++ 4.something Ubuntu 12.10 "Turn screen off when inactive for: Never" still turns off