load old village to new phone I have been playing Clash of Clans on my iPhone 5. I have town hall 10. Now I have gotten a new Galaxy 5. I am trying to get my old village onto my new phone but it isn't work. When I first launched Clash of Clans on the new phone, it automatically did load a new village town hall 1. I can still launch the old village on my old phone. Is there any way to get my old village to my new phone?
How do I recover my old Clash of Clans (COC) game save & base? I unintentionally and stupidly wiped my Clash of Clans game data. I went to Application Manager on my Android and clicked 'Clear data'. (I used this for fixes before and it never started a new game.)   Now, my level 60 or so base has been wiped as if was to start a new game. Have I doomed myself to starting again or is there a way in which I can retrieve my old game save? Maybe by contacting Supercell? I have a snapshot of my base.
How to find out if my system is i386 or x86_64 before installing Ubuntu? I am using Windows as of now and want to install Ubuntu. I want to find out if my system is i386 or x86_64? How do I do that? "Stack Overflow" showing up on hamburger menu for all sites to link to /questions Why does it say "Stack Overflow" instead of the site name? The  currently says  In the context of Stack Exchange sites, any copying and pasting of any amount of text or code that wasn't written by you is plagiarism if you try, explicitly or implicitly, to pass it off as your own work. (italics mine)  There is also a concept of . Should this also be addressed in the FAQs? In other words, is it OK to copy (large parts of) your own answer  without proper attribution? This or That person How can I create a Windows bootable USB stick using Ubuntu? What is $\lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{k=1}^n \left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^n$? I'm asked to find $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{k=1}^n \left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^n$.  It seems that the sum converges.  I managed to prove that $\forall n,1&lt;\sum_{k=1}^n \left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^n&lt;e$  But I don't know how to prove convergence, nor find the value of the limit. Parse and Extract Attributes from JSON When does $120$ divide $n^5 - n$ Find n such that $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $120$. (*Here $n$ belongs to the natural number set)  Seems a trivial problem, but the answer mentioned in the text book seemed incomplete to me so I'm here just to ensure whether approach to this problem is correct or not.  So my approach is as follows: We know that $n^5 - n$ can be written as $n^5-n = n(n-1)(n+1)(n^2 + 1)$  Now since it's product of three consecutive natural numbers so it's divisible by $3! = 6$. Now using Fermat's Little theorem we can prove that $n^5= n \mod5$ hence $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $5$ as well. So $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $30$. Now to ensure their is another factor of $4$ in the term we need to ensure that $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $8$. I found that all odd natural numbers and multiples of $8$ makes $n^5 - n$ divisible by $8$, hence $n^5 - n$ is divisible by $120$. But in the text book they have only mentioned odd natural numbers as answer, which seemed incomplete to me.  Thanking everyone in advance:P What is the behaviour of \fontsize if baselineskip is below a certain value? during my optimization process I found something spurious I cannot explain to myself and which I would like to understand. So with \fontsize you set the fontsize and the baselineskip. However the behaviour of the second paramater is a bit unclear to me, because if you reduce it too much, at a certain point the baselineskip gets bigger again. Let me show you my example: \documentclass[landscape]{article} \usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry} \usepackage{lipsum,multicol}  \begin{document} \begin{multicols}{4}     \fontsize{10}{11}\selectfont     \lipsum[1]     \columnbreak          \fontsize{10}{10}\selectfont     \lipsum[1]     \columnbreak          \fontsize{10}{9}\selectfont     \lipsum[1]     \columnbreak          \fontsize{10}{8}\selectfont     \lipsum[1]     \columnbreak \end{multicols} \end{document}  If you compile this, your result will be looking like this:  Now from the first to the third column it seems logic, that the baselineskip is reduced and hence less space is needed vertically to typeset. But with the third column, even though the baselineskip is reduced even further, it needs more vertical space overall. It is strange however, that for example from line 11 to 12 (starting with tus and lum), the spacing seems to be narrower than in column 3, while in a lot of line the spacing is bigger. Changing the baselineskip to lower values down to 0 does not modify the vertical alignment further. What is the purpose of this behaviour and is it intended? I cannot see a benefit of this and I am a bit confused. Recent reports claim that the gravitational waves detected by LIGO match up with the signal expected from two black holes merging as predicted by general relativity.  Additionally, the masses of both black holes were estimated. Questions:  How certain are we that the detected of gravitational waves are necessarily from two black holes merging?  Since supermassive black holes are typically at the center of a host galaxy, what happened to the galaxies that contained the two merging black holes?  For example, did their host galaxies merge?    Edit After reading the answers, I understand that the signals detected by LIGO are proof of the validity of gravitational wave generational artifacts as predicted by general relativity.  When additionally gravitational waves, caused by the merger of the supermassive black holes (those which ARE indeed located in the centers of the merging galaxies) will be detected, since mergers of galaxies could be observed by the methods independent of gravitational waves such as registering the fact of the quasar appearance (). Additional questions:  Could someone offer me the historical ASTRONOMY precedent when the second degree of inference (from the mathematical model, being associated with the theory of Physics) was accepted as the discovery of the astronomical object?  Could someone give a reference to trustable scientific publication, with the subject of study being discussion of requirements satisfying claim of astronomical discovery of an astronomical object?  Have independent scientific sources (outside of members of the LIGO team) analyzed methodology and results of the LIGO signal detection, and published their conclusions with regards of what was actually discovered? How can I get dramatic shallow DOF with a kit lens? For various such sentences in many cases I get confused, it seems different for different cases. I want to know if someone left doing something for permanantly then what should be used? Also give some examples for different cases. Suppose... "I left my bag" means "I forgot my bag". but If I want to say the same for permanentaly "I left bringing my bag". Where should we use "stop" and "quit" then? How can I use docker without sudo? On Docker's documentation pages, all example commands are shown without sudo, like this one:  docker ps   On Ubuntu, the binary is called docker.io. It also does not work without sudo:  sudo docker.io ps   How can I configure Docker so that I don't need to prefix every Docker command with sudo? In PostgreSQL is the row ordering preserved in functions and CTEs? Why do we use the base form of verbs instead of the past form in past tense questions? In regard to this , my question is similar but that answer is not clear. I want to know why we use base form of verb, e.g. 'go' to form the past tense instead of past form such as 'went'?     Question: Did you go to a bank?  (Why we use 'go' here, rather than 'went'?)   Answer: I went to a bank.   Am I confusing verb forms with tenses? Please note that I'm not a native speaker so some clarification or reference on this would be helpful. Human-readable filesize with find's printf Show image in panel I'd like to show an image (png, preferably) in my panel. Does anyone know if this is supported through labels or template_XX UIPanels? Why is it string.join(list) instead of list.join(string)? What are the assumptions for applying a quantile regression model? The question has been asked (one time) on CV before, but the answer is really imprecise and does not really answer the question in my opinion.  So: What are the assumptions for estimating a linear regression model via quantile regression?  To my understanding (and as several CV users have mentioned), quantile regression does not assume any specific distribution of the error terms - does that mean that, in a time series model, autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity do not have to be accounted for?  What about the other Gauss-Markov assumptions? I would assume that the assumption of no perfect multicollinearity has to be met when applying quantile regression, but do the parameters have to be linear? The linearity assumption only has to hold for the specific quantile I would assume.  Anyways - I do not find any backup for any of my thoughts in the scientific literature and I would appreciate a comprehensive answer. Thank you! Just as background, I should say I am a mathematics grad student who is trying to learn some physics. I've been reading "The Theoretical Minimum" by Susskind and Hrabovsky and on page 134, they introduce  transformations. Here's the first example they use:  Consider a particle moving in the x,y plane under the influence of a potential, $V$, which depends only on the radius, with Lagrangian:   $L=\frac{m}{2}(\dot{x}^2+\dot{y}^2)-V(x^2+y^2)$  This is clearly invariant under rotations:  $x \rightarrow x\cos \theta + y\sin \theta$  $y \rightarrow -x\sin \theta + y\cos \theta$  All well and good. Now they say "consider what happens ... when the angle $\theta$ is replaced by an infinitesimal angle $\delta$." Already I could say "What the heck is $\delta$ really?", but I'm willing to play along with my intuition. Since $\delta$ is infinitesimal, we work to first order and say   $\cos \delta=1$ and $\sin \delta= \delta$.  Plugging this into our rotation formulas above, we obtain:  $x \rightarrow x+y\delta$  $y \rightarrow y-x\delta$  By differentiating, we see that:  $\dot{x} \rightarrow \dot{x}+\dot{y}\delta$  $\dot{y} \rightarrow \dot{y}-\dot{x}\delta$  Plugging these into the Lagrangian and ignoring terms higher than first order, we see that the Lagrangian is invariant under this transformation.  My main problem with all of this is that I don't understand what the physical nature of an infinitesimal transformation actually is. All I got from the above was that if you do this formal calculation by following rules like "only work to first order in $\delta$," then the Lagrangian is invariant. This is in contrast to the case where we have an actual transformation, like a rotation, where there is no question about what is going on physically.  I would also like to know how all of this relates to rigorous mathematics. In mathematics, I can't recall ever using infinitesimals in an argument or calculation, so it would be useful if there was some way of formulating the above in terms of limits/ derivatives/ differential forms (for example). I sense a connection to Lie Algebras, as the infinitesimal version of the rotation is $(I+A)$ where $I$ is the identity matrix and $A$ is an element of the Lie Algebra of $SO(2)$.   Here are some questions whose answers I believe may be useful to me (feel free to answer some or all):  -What is an infinitesimal quantity like $\delta$ to the physicist?   -Why do physicists argue using infinitesimals rather than "standard" calculus?  -What is the physical meaning of infinitesimal transformation? How does it relate to Lie Algebras?   -Is there a rigorous theoretical apparatus for justifying the computations shown above?  -What is meant by the Lagrangian being invariant under infinitesimal transformations?  If any of the questions seem too vague, please say so. Thanks in advance for your insights!