I have tried to compute the first few terms to try to find a pattern but I got  $$\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{3}{8}+\frac{4}{16}+\frac{5}{32}+\frac{6}{64}$$  but I still don't see any obvious pattern(s). I also tried to look for a pattern in the question, but I cannot see any pattern (possibly because I'm overthinking it?) Please help me with this problem.
How can I evaluate $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{2n}{3^{n+1}}$$? I know the answer thanks to , but I'm more concerned with how I can derive that answer. It cites tests to prove that it is convergent, but my class has never learned these before. So I feel that there must be a simpler method.  In general, how can I evaluate $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)x^n?$$
How to display Trash and Home folder icons? How do idle games handle such large numbers? Just wondering how games such as Tap titans and Cookie Clicker handle such large numbers.  I am trying to implement an idle game however the largest number format supported by C# is decimal.   I am looking to support up to 10^500; that needs to be floating point  How could I handle this?  P.S. it needs to be cross platform i.e. pc, mac, ios, android and compatible with Unity How to show ascii art at the top of the terminal when it's opened? Lightning component calling wrong overloaded apex class method I know that any group satisfying $x^2=1$ for all $x$ is abelian. Is the same true if $x^3=1$? I don't think it is, but I can't find a basic counterexample. Using "that" and "this" interchangeably Learning and using English I'm always confused about what word to use for referring to things that have been described by me a few sentences earlier: "that" or "this".   Confusion comes from the fact that only the equivalent of "this" is always used in my native language for such referring. But I've noticed that in English for such referring "that" is used as often as "this" (or maybe even more often).  Some examples for illustrating (just tried to google something appropriate to convey my idea better):     We assess local... the demographics of the local population. What are the natural traffic drivers in the area. Things like cinemas and pubs and retail and office and all that type of things and we now put together a bit of a matrix and actually give a weighted score to each of the things we know help our business. That helps us decide in a more scientific fashion.   or:     The problem of Cervantes' origin became after that into a tough matter. Some experts believed that the Cervantes from Alcázar, in the times of the Lepanto Battle, was in the age of a child, more concerned about gathering nests and that type of things than about fighting as a soldier.   and for "this":     I believe lot of people who involved fishery industries in Mexico Gulf are suffering now but as for economic issues, U.S government and other countries will support them and give an utmost response to it. Important thing is that we learn from this mistake and make sure this type of things will never happen in the future and protect nature environment thus we have to take this technology to get energy from water very seriously. I really hope this technology will be available and used for everybody as soon as possible.   Is there a rule describing proper usage of these words in cases like this? (or should I have written "..in cases like that"?) Introductory Calculus textbook for physics? Three files have suddenly appeared in my home directory, called "client_state.xml", "lockfile", and "time_stats_log". The last two are empty. I'm wondering how they got there. It's not the first time it has happened, but the last time was weeks ago; I deleted the files and nothing broke or complained. I haven't been able to think of what I was doing at the time reported by stat $filename. Is there any way I can find out where they came from?  Alternatively, is there a way to monitor the home directory (but not sub-directories) for the creation of files? I need to calculate the Cramer Rao lower bound of variance for the parameter $\theta$ of the distribution $$f(x)=\frac{1}{\pi(1+(x-\theta)^2)}$$   How do I proceed I have calculated $$4 E\frac{(X-\theta)^2}{1+X^2+\theta^2-2X\theta}$$  Can somebody help I am trying to install Ubuntu 16.04 LTS on a Dell XPS 13 (9350). The laptop came with Windows 10 pre-installed. I am installing from a pendrive but I think the issue would be the same if I used e.g. a USB DVD drive.   Dude, where's my hard drive?  I am blocked because the installation program cannot find 8.6Gb of free space on my hard drive despite the fact that there are hundreds of Gb free according to Windows. Digging a bit into the problem, it seems that Ubuntu cannot see my hard disk at all.    This is the output of GParted:    I am not sure what that drive mounted at /cdrom is, but it seems the only device that exists in the system that is not a RAM disk or a loop device:   Content of /proc/partitions:   ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ cat /proc/partitions   major minor  #blocks  name     1        0      65536 ram0     1        1      65536 ram1     1        2      65536 ram2     1        3      65536 ram3     1        4      65536 ram4     1        5      65536 ram5     1        6      65536 ram6     1        7      65536 ram7     1        8      65536 ram8     1        9      65536 ram9     1       10      65536 ram10     1       11      65536 ram11     1       12      65536 ram12     1       13      65536 ram13     1       14      65536 ram14     1       15      65536 ram15     7        0     130048 loop0     7        1    1104188 loop1     8        0    1970239 sda     8        1    1953439 sda1   Summary of fdisk -l:   ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo fdisk -l |grep Disk Disk /dev/ram0: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram1: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram2: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram3: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram4: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram5: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram6: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram7: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram8: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram9: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram10: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram11: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram12: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram13: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram14: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors Disk /dev/loop0: 127 MiB, 133169152 bytes, 260096 sectors Disk /dev/loop1: 1.1 GiB, 1130688512 bytes, 2208376 sectors Disk /dev/sda: 1.9 GiB, 2017525248 bytes, 3940479 sectors Disklabel type: dos Disk identifier: 0x00000000   Result of fdisk of the only non-loop non-RAM device (not sure this is relevant):   ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo fdisk -l |grep -A 50 sda Disk /dev/sda: 1.9 GiB, 2017525248 bytes, 3940479 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: dos Disk identifier: 0x00000000  Device     Boot Start     End Sectors  Size Id Type /dev/sda1  *      129 3907007 3906879  1.9G  c W95 FAT32 (LBA)   I am blocked at this point. Any help will be much appreciated.   Additional information (following comments):   Running dmesg |grep -i sata shows (among others) eight lines that suggest some kind of error:   ata1: SATA link down (SStatus FFFFFFFF SControl FFFFFFFF) ata2: SATA link down (SStatus FFFFFFFF SControl FFFFFFFF) ata3: SATA link down (SStatus FFFFFFFF SControl FFFFFFFF) ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0) ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0) ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0) ata7: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0) ata8: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0)  I have "Restarted" windows instead of only "Shutdown" it to avoid problems with "fast startup", following some recommendations I have read of other users having problems installing Linux on Windows 10 laptops.ago   Regarding SATA, the BIOS says: "SATA Operation: RAID ON". The other two options available are "Disabled" and "AHCI".    I have followed the instructions of these two pages from Dell: , . Is the cube root of a prime number rational? I have a question about making an ending symbol.  It is a LaTex-default that every proof environment has an ending symbol. I want to make every theorem-alike environment such as the example environment have also an ending symbol. But how to manually set this up? Specifically, I want to make all these environments ended by a square symbol.  \newtheorem{thm}{Theorem} \newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma} \newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary} \newtheorem{pro}[thm]{Proposition} \newtheorem{assump}{Assumption} \newtheorem{axiom}{Axiom} \newtheorem*{conj}{Conjecture} \theoremstyle{definition} \newtheorem{defi}[thm]{Definition} \newtheorem{exam}{Example} \newtheorem{exer}{Exercise} \newtheorem*{rem}{Remark} \newtheorem*{notation}{Notation} \newtheorem*{note}{Note}   I am looking for, with gratitude, a comprehensive setup. Why is the voltage across a capacitor and the current across an inductor continuous? I've just gotten through replacing capacitors on a trio of dead LCD screens (nothing's blown up yet, so far) - they either had one or two capacitors on their inverter circuit SLIGHTLY bloated, and not quite leaky. I ended up replacing all capacitors of the same brand/'colour', even the ones that looked fine, in case.  Now, checking a bad resistor is simple - i can use a standard multimeter to test it, and i tend to check my solders with the continuity testing option of the multimeter.  How would i test a capacitor ? Is there some standard, common way to test one? Java - Could not find the main class Let $F$ be a field and $x\in F$. If $x=-x$ and $1\neq -1$, then $$0=\frac{x+x}{1+1}=\frac{1+1}{1+1}x=x.$$ This means that the statement in the title is true if and only if $1\neq -1$. But how do we know that $1\neq -1$ for an arbitary field? I am writing a cover letter and CV using moderncv. Everything works fine so far, but the text in the cover letter is not justified. I think it is good that it is not hyphenated, but it would look much nicer if the text was justified.  Here is a minimal example:  \documentclass{moderncv} \moderncvstyle{classic}  \usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text  \firstname{John} \familyname{Doe}  \begin{document} \recipient{Prof.\ Dr.\ Foo Bar}{} \opening{Dear Professor Dr.\ Bar,} \closing{Yours sincerely,} \enclosure[Attached]{curriculum vit\ae}  \makelettertitle \lipsum[1] \makeletterclosing  \clearpage  \makecvtitle  \section{Education} \cventry{2009--present}{PhD Student}{here}{and}{there}{} \end{document} Can wizards really cast spells in armor? Compute $\lim_{x\to\infty}x\;\left[\left(1+\frac{1}{x}\right)^x-e\right]$ How can I compute the following limit, and is there a general method to resolve problems of this type?  $$\lim_{x\to\infty}x\left[\left(1+\frac{1}{x}\right)^x-e\right]$$ Testing equality of coefficients from two different regressions This seems to be a basic issue, but I just realized that I actually don't know how to test equality of coefficients from two different regressions. Can anyone shed some light on this?   More formally, suppose I ran the following two regressions:  $$ y_1 = X_1\beta_1 + \epsilon_1 $$ and  $$ y_2 = X_2\beta_2 + \epsilon_2 $$ where $X_i$ refers to the design matrix of regression $i$, and $\beta_i$ to the vector of coefficients in regression $i$. Note that $X_1$ and $X_2$ are potentially very different, with different dimensions etc. I am interested in for instance whether or not $\hat\beta_{11} \neq \hat\beta_{21}$.   If these came from the same regression, this would be trivial. But since they come from different ones, I am not quite sure how to do it. Does anyone have an idea or can give me some pointers?   My problem in detail: My first intuition was to look at the confidence intervals, and if they overlap, then I would say they are essentially the same. This procedure does not come with the correct size of the test, though (i.e. each individual confidence interval has $\alpha=0.05$, say, but looking at them jointly will not have the same probability). My "second" intuition was to conduct a normal t-test. That is, take   $$ \frac{\beta_{11}-\beta_{21}}{sd(\beta_{11})} $$  where $\beta_{21}$ is taken as the value of my null hypothesis. This does not take into account the estimation uncertainty of $\beta_{21}$, though, and the answer may depend on the order of the regressions (which one I call 1 and 2).   My third idea was to do it as in a standard test for equality of two coefficients from the same regression, that is take  $$ \frac{\beta_{11}-\beta_{21}}{sd(\beta_{11}-\beta_{21})} $$   The complication arises due to the fact that both come from different regressions. Note that   $$ Var(\beta_{11}-\beta_{21}) = Var(\beta_{11}) + Var(\beta_{21}) -2 Cov(\beta_{11},\beta_{21}) $$ but since they are from different regressions, how would I get $Cov(\beta_{11},\beta_{21})$?  This led me to ask this question here. This must be a standard procedure / standard test, but I cound not find anything that was sufficiently similar to this problem. So, if anyone can point me to the correct procedure, I would be very grateful!