Just learning Omega 3 and 4 is out so I'm switching to try it out, but.. how does one install a subtheme manually? My drush is whacked and I already running multiple installs so I just want to do it manually.  However, copying the "default" folder to the sites/all/themes/ folder... there is no info file... so I duped the one in Omega, changed the name and it shows in the Appearance menu. However, the name isn't correct and I've gone through the few files to see what to change to my themes name but there was only one file.  So, I enabled one, it enables, but then when I click "Settings" next to that theme, I get the WSOD.  Seems not to be the same process as in D6 or even Omega 3. Anyone installed a subtheme of Omega 4 yet manually?
I'm trying to create a functioning sub theme of Omega 4.4. I've worked  with Drush before with it, but the site is on a host that I'm not administrator of. I've tried the  but not succeeded in executing the Omega Wizard. In short, the Omega Wizard may be extremely helpful, but I can't get it to work.   Next, I've tried to manually create a sub theme using the . However, the results of this is a theme catalogue in the Themes-folder, but the theme not showing up in Drupal. Perhaps I'm using the wrong instructions for the wrong version of Omega?  Anyhow, does anyone have instructions for how to install an Omega 4.4 sub theme manually for Drupal 7?
What happens to the holes in the skull where teeth were developing? In Skeptics.SE, a question regarding the skulls of children arose. Depicting a scary skull where the permenent teeth are "hidden" inside the jaws and the milk teeth are in the their place.  After all milk teeth fall out, and the permanent teeth "rise", do the holes left by them filled up, or do we go around with holes in our jaws?    The picture: How to process a multi column text file to get another multi column text file? I have a text file:  a   aa  aaa     b   bb  bbb     c   cc  ccc d   dd  ddd     e   ee  eee     f   ff  fff g   gg  ggg     h   hh  hhh     i   ii  iii j   jj  jjj   How can I process it and get a 2 column file like this:  a   aa aaa b bb  bbb c   cc ccc d dd  ddd e   ee eee f ff  fff g   gg ggg h hh  hhh i   ii iii j jj  jjj   Or a three column file like this:  a   aa  aaa b   bb  bbb c   cc  ccc d   dd  ddd e   ee  eee f   ff  fff g   gg  ggg h   hh  hhh i   ii  iii j   jj  jj   I prefer to get awk solution but other solutions are welcomed too. If $X,Y$ are equivalence relations, so is $X \times Y$ Number of vertices present in all maximum matchings Given a graph $G$, we need to find the cardinality of the largest set of vertices so that each of them are present in every maximum matching possible.   Is there a solution beside the obvious remove each vertex and find the maximum matching to see it reduces? Looking out into the universe means looking back in time - how does that work? This is a question that has been gnawing on me for many years now. Back a long time ago, as I recall in reference to a scene in a popular science show on TV, I was asked the following.  The claim is that when you look out into the universe, you see the universe as it appeared at some past time. (This follows from the speed of light being finite, and looking at objects by observing their emitted light or other EM radiation.) The amount of time that one looks backwards is equal to the distance to the observed object in light-distance (so looking at something ten lightyears away means you are observing it as it was ten years ago).  Matter moves at a rate of speed less than the speed of light (it has to, since matter has mass, even if miniscule at the atomic level). So $v_{mass} \lt v_{EM}$ (probably significantly less, since $v_{EM} = c$).  So let's say you're looking at an object $10^{10}$ lightyears away by observing something for which $v=c$. To the observer, that object appears as it was $10^{10}$ years ago. But the Earth is much younger than $10^{10}$ years and we established that matter moves at a slower speed than EM radiation, so wouldn't the radiation that was emitted $10^{10}$ years ago long since have passed Earth's current position?  If, say, $v_{mass} = 0.5 \times c$ (a big assumption, but bear with me for a second), it would seem that the radiation emitted $10^{10}$ years ago would have passed Earth's current position $10^{10} - (0.5 \times 10^{10}) = 5 \times 10^{9}$ years ago, around the time when the solar system was still forming. Setting $v_{mass} = 0.25 \times c$ (which seems more realistic) means the radiation would have passed "us" around $7.5 \times 10^{9}$ years ago. So how could we be observing it now?  I'm not sure I'm posing this question in the best possible way (I'll admit I do find the concept somewhat confusing), and I'm sure that there's a simple explanation for it all. Just what am I missing?  I did find  which seems peripherally related but not quite the same thing. Qmechanic brought up  but that question seems to be about whether it is so, not why it is so. an "X is an X is an X" what does this mean? What would you call a word that doesn't exist in or translate well into another language? I've run into this situation several times, being a native Spanish speaker.   There are some words you just can't translate into another language. Is there a particular word to describe this?  I'm not refering to idioms.  Also, if its a noun, people tend to use them by surrounding them in quotes. Is this appropiate?  Example:     I arrived at around 5 pm and had some quesadillas.   Edit:  I also meant to cover words that exist in English, but cannot be translated into another language.   Example:      There isn't a word for "drive-thru" in your language. My port of entry and exit is Frankfurt, Germany. However i will only be spending a day or two there. I am visiting Spain and Portugal for a week each. So should I be applying to Spain embassy or German embassy? I am an Indian citizen. Custom first page with fancyhdr I'm using the package fancyhdr to format my footers and headers, with my name in the header and a n of m pages format for the footer. Like so:  \pagestyle{fancy} \fancyhf{} % clear all header and footer fields \fancyhead[C]{Name} \fancyfoot[C]{\footnotesize Page \thepage\ of \pageref{LastPage}}   By default, the fancy page style only affects the pages after the first page. I know I can set the first page to the fancy page style using \thispagestyle, but I only want the first page to use the footer, not the header. Is there a way to create a custom style that just the first page will use? Say I have a huge text file (>2GB) and I just want to cat the lines X to Y (e.g. 57890000 to 57890010).  From what I understand I can do this by piping head into tail or viceversa, i.e.   head -A /path/to/file | tail -B   or alternatively  tail -C /path/to/file | head -D   where A,B,C and D can be computed from the number of lines in the file, X and Y.  But there are two problems with this approach:   You have to compute A,B,C and D. The commands could pipe to each other many more lines than I am interested in reading (e.g. if I am reading just a few lines in the middle of a huge file)   Is there a way to have the shell just work with and output the lines I want? (while providing only X and Y)? The official currency of Hungary is the Forint but so far everything I have looked for prices online, such as trains, buses and taxis, are quoted in Euros and Forints. Hotel reservation asked that I pay in Euros at the hotel. Considering that I will only spend a few days in Budapest, are Forints necessary? Or can I pay for transport, admissions and food in Euros? In such a case, how is the conversion rate set? What are some good books for learning general relativity? Can all fundamental forces be fictitious forces? Copying prod multi-site installation to dev multi-site installation I am attempting to upgrade my Drupal 8.9.2 multi-site installation to D9. I was hoping to work this all out on a development installation, that is located in a subdirectory of my home directory on my NameCheap Shared Hosting plan. When I first installed this installation, I did so using the tarball method from years ago. I then followed the instructions given here (). I was able to get the current running prod version converted to use composer with out an issue. Before I go and start messing with the files, and attempting to upgrade to D9 through composer on a prod installation, I wanted to copy these files over to another installation where I can use it as a sandbox. To do this I:  copied the files on my server to a new directory made clone databases for the new installation truncated all the cache tables in the cloned DB changed all the database settings in the settings files to point to the cloned databases  I've done this before without any issues, and now I seem to be getting a WSOD error on all the sites running from the new installation. The error I'm getting is  PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught Error: Class 'Drupal\Core\Cache\DatabaseBackend' not found in ~/{new installation dir}/public_html/index.php:16.  If anyone has any thoughts what's going on I am all ears. Thank you in advance Is there any easy LINQ expression to concatenate my entire List&lt;string&gt; collection items to a single string with a delimiter character?  What if the collection is of custom objects instead of string? Imagine I need to concatenate on object.Name. If you've ever been annoyingly poked by a geek, you might be familiar with the semi-nerdy obnoxious response of      "I'm not actually touching you! The electrons in the atoms of my   skin are just getting really close to yours!"   Expanding on this a little bit, it seems the obnoxious geek is right. After all, consider Zeno's paradox. Every time you try to touch two objects together, you have to get them halfway there, then quarter-way, etc. In other words, there's always a infinitesimal distance in between the two objects.   Atoms don't "touch" each other; even the protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom aren't "touching" each other.  So what does it mean for two objects to touch each other?   Are atoms that join to form a molecule "touching"? I suppose the atoms are touching, because their is some overlap, but the subatomic particles are just whizzing around avoiding each other. If this is the case, should "touching" just be defined relative to some context? I.e, if I touch your hand, our hands are touching, but unless you pick up some of my DNA, the molecules in our hands aren't touching? And since the molecules aren't changing, the atoms aren't touching either?  Is there really no such thing as "touching"? Mark my own question as favorite? Capture console exit C# How can I use variables in the LHS and RHS of a sed substitution? Unable to mount ISO in write mode