I wanted to lock any directory with a password, is it possible to set up pin or password for any directory or file without using third party tools like cryptkeeper.
Is there any simple (IE: right click in Nautilus) way to password protect a particular folder/file in Ubuntu? I've got a few files containing sensitive info and I'd much prefer that if/when I leave my computer alone, they aren't accidentally accessed by someone else.  The secruty does not have to be extremely tight. My only concern is that when family/friends come over, I don't really like the idea of them looking at my bank details, accounts or, you guessed it, porn collection.  A simple, effective way to let me put my machine in the hands of someone else knowing that said machine can not cause me embarresment is the sole reason why I'd like to see this in Ubuntu.
The product of a normal and Rademacher variables, independent from each other Let $X\sim N(0,1)$ and let $Z$ be a random variable independent of $X$ such that:  \begin{equation} \Pr(Z=z) = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2} &amp; \mbox{if $z = -1$ or $z=1$}, \\ \\ 0 &amp; \mbox{otherwise}. \end{cases} \end{equation}   Define $Y = ZX$. Show that $Y \sim N(0,1)$. Determine $\operatorname{Cor}(X,Y)$. Are $X$ and $Y$ independent?   Progress:  I'm basically stuck at the beginning. I got as far as $P(ZX &lt; y) = P(Z &lt; y/X)$, which I'm not even sure is correct. I'm also not clear on what it means by defining $Y = ZX$ - does it mean I need to state the probability density function or something? And how do I show that $Y \sim N(0,1)$? See YouTube videos in Anaglyph mode How to see a YouTube video in  from a non-3D Android device? I am not able to enable Anaglyph mode from the YouTube application. When did the word "so" begin to be used to start a sentence? In the last few years, I've noticed a growing usage of the word "so" to begin a sentence, especially in the context of higher education.  For example:   Interviewer: "What is the nature of your research"  Researcher: "So, what we wanted to find out is..."  It seems to be a replacement the word "well", or, more informally, "ok".  Has this usage of the word been around for a long time and I'm just now noticing it?  Do you think that is a valid use of the word? In mathematics, "A or B" includes "A and B". Does "either" mean "A or B but not (A and B)" or does it include the possibility of "A and B"? The context might be mathematics, formal logic or ordinary language. Changing text applied when duplicating file in Finder When duplicating files in the finder, OS X attaches a space followed by 'copy' to the file name. This can lead to some file alphabetizing problems and the copies may appear out of order (not directly subsequent to the original). Is there a way to change the appended text? I would prefer that it says '_1' or _copy. Thanks. How to calculate $\lim \limits_{n \to \infty}(1 +\frac{a}{n})^n$? have already been created through .  have already completed their beta stage and are waiting for launch.  are in public beta stage.  are in commitment phase in   proposals are listed in   Now it is really confusing to find a suitable site to ask a question. As an example - I host a blog using . Now I have a question about this hosting. I want to post it in a . Where will I post? I have 2 options available now.     Are developers trying anything to solve this confusing matter? Induction proof: n lines in a plane Assume that there are $n$ infinitely long straight lines lying on a plane in such a way that no two lines are parallel, and no three lines intersect at a single point. Prove that these lines divide the plane into $\frac{n^2+n+2}{2}$ regions. (Hint: Any two non-parallel straight lines on a plane must intersect at exactly one point.)  Can someone tell me where to start here? I know to prove the base where $n=0$, but don't know how to proceed.  Any help is greatly appreciated! Show that unit circle is not homeomorphic to the real line VARCHAR size limit in Excel spreadsheets Showing that a map is bijective and finding its inverse Let $S$ := {$(x, y) ∈ \mathbb R^2: x^2 + y^2 = 1$} be the unit circle. Let $p = (0, -1)$ ∈ $S$. Define a map $F$ from $\mathbb R$ × {$0$} to $S$ as follows: Given $(t, 0)$, let $F((t, 0)) = (x, y)$ ∈ $S$ be the intersection of $S$ with the line through $p$ and $(t, 0)$. Derive a formula for $F$. Show that $t$ → $F((t, 0))$ is a bijective map from $\mathbb R$ to $S$ \ {$p$}, and also derive a formula for its inverse.  If we express $S$ in polar coordinates: $$S:=\{(r,\varphi):r=1,\varphi∈(-\frac\pi{2},\frac{3\pi}{2})\}$$ then, from simple trigonometric relations, the inverse function $\Phi$ is: $$\Phi(\varphi)=\tan\frac{\frac\pi2-\varphi}2$$ and its inverse $F$ is: $$F(t)=\frac\pi{2}-2\arctan t$$ After changing coordinates back to cartesian, $F$ will look like: $$F(t)=(\cos(\frac\pi{2}-2\arctan t),\sin(\frac\pi{2}-2\arctan t))$$ which can be further simplified to: $$F(t)=(\frac{2 t}{t^2 + 1},\frac{1 - t^2}{t^2 + 1})$$ Is this the formula of $F$? Is it correct? And I know that to show that $\phi$ : $\mathbb R$ →  $S$ \ {$p$} is a bijective map, I have to show that $\phi$ is injective and surjective. But how do I do that? Can someone please help me show that $\phi$ is bijective? and how can I derive a formula for its inverse? Simple past or present perfect? Which is preferable, simple past or present perfect, in situations like this one: I had a conversation with my friend and we planned to do something; shortly afterwards I call him back to announce the accomplishments. My biggest doubt about simple past is that perfect aspect is used to indicate past action (accomplishment) with current relevance, at the same time I'm not sure if I'm allowed to use present perfect, because there's a gap between accomplishing and the current moment, which is a characteristic of simple past. Is "life" a countable noun in English? I am a learner of English. Sometimes I see an article (a and the) before the noun (life) but sometimes I also see the noun without any article. So I am confused when should I use an article before the noun and when I should not. Please check the examples and let me know are they correct?     Examples:      His life is an awesome life.      I want to get a beautiful life.      I like the life he lived. Luggage transfer in Dubai between flights, without a visa I am traveling from Stockholm to Dubai and Dubai to Nairobi using two different airlines. I have Kenyan nationality and can't go through Immigration because I don't have a Dubai visa.    How I will get my luggage? Deciding what answer to accept: the correct one-liner or the later elaborate one with code? Lately I've been getting some good answers to some specific questions. However, I've been hesitating on what answer I should accept.  Do I go with the short quick answer or do I accept a later answer where someone has elaborated on the previous answer with some code?  It's not really important but it kind of bugs me to not accept an answer when people have taken the trouble of replying.  Here's two examples: The following is a geometry puzzle from a math school book. Even though it has been a long time since I finished school, I remember this puzzle quite well, and I don't have a nice solution to it.  So here is the puzzle:    The triangle $ABC$ is known to be isosceles, that is, $AC=BC$. The labelled angles are known to be $\alpha=\gamma=20°$, $\beta=30°$. The task is to find the angle labelled "?".  The only solution that I know of is to use the sine formula and cosine formula several times. From this one can obtain a numerical solution. Moreover this number can be algebraically shown to be correct (all sines and cosines are contained in the real subfield of the 36th cyclotomic field). So in this sense I solved the problem, but the solution is kind of a brute force attack (for example, some of the polynomials that show up in the computation have coefficients > 1000000). Since the puzzle originates from a book that deals only with elemetary geometry (and not even trigonometry if I remember correctly) there has to be a more elegant solution. In the answer , the parser breaks my URL link.  The URL was with __word__:      http://www.open-mpi.de/projects/hwloc/doc/v1.2/group__hwlocality__membinding.php#gade5e2c28ea8475a479bf2b1df36c6ccd   After parsing, it becomes (&lt;a href is broken; no clickable link):  hwlocality_membinding.php#gade5e2c28ea8475a479bf2b1df36c6ccd"&gt;http://www.open-mpi.de/projects/hwloc/doc/v1.2/group_hwlocality_membinding.php#gade5e2c28ea8475a479bf2b1df36c6ccd   Short test:  http://example.com/_test_ -> test"&gt;http://example.com/test  Or if I put in a naked URL with _test_ just here: Creating your own Tinyurl style uid I'm writing a small article on humanly readable alternatives to Guids/UIDs, for example those used on TinyURL for the url hashes (which are often printed in magazines, so need to be short).  The simple uid I'm generating is - 6 characters: either a lowercase letter (a-z) or 0-9.   "According to my calculations captain", that's 6 mutually exclusive events, although calculating the probability of a clash gets a little harder than P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B), as obviously it includes numbers and from the code below, you can see it works out whether to use a number or letter using 50/50.  I'm interested in the clash rate and if the code below is a realistic simulation of anticipated clash rate you'd get from generating a hash. On average I get 40-50 clashes per million, however bare in mind the uid wouldn't be generated a million times at once, but probably only around 10-1000 times a minute.  What is the probability of a clash each time, and can anyone suggest a better way of doing it?  static Random _random = new Random();  public static void main() {     // Size of the key, 6     HashSet&lt;string&gt; set = new HashSet&lt;string&gt;();     int clashes = 0;     for (int n=0;n &lt; 1000000;n++)     {         StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();          for (int i =0;i &lt; 7;i++)         {             if (_random.NextDouble() &gt; 0.5)             {                 builder.Append((char)_random.Next(97,123));             }             else             {                 builder.Append(_random.Next(0,9).ToString());             }         }          if (set.Contains(builder.ToString()))         {             clashes++;             Console.WriteLine("clash: (" +n+ ")" +builder.ToString());         }          set.Add(builder.ToString());         _random.Next();         //Console.Write(builder.ToString());     }      Console.WriteLine("Clashes: " +clashes);     Console.ReadLine(); }   UPDATE:   from this question  I really asked two questions here so I was cheating. The answer I was after was rcar's, however Sklivvz's is also the answer to the 2nd part (an alternative). Is it possible to make a custom unique id generator in a database, or would it be client side (which would be 2 possible reads first)?  The general idea I was after was using Ids in databases or other stores that can be used by phone or printed material, not a giant 16 byte guid.  UPDATE 2: I put the formula for two mutually exclusive events above instead of 2 independent ones (as getting an 'a' the first time doesn't mean you can't get an 'a' the second time). Should've been P(A and B) = P(A) x P(B) It's a series of fantasy books in which the inhabitants of the world, from the time when they're children, get to somehow have an accompanying small animal that represents their soul or their personality. MWE:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{listings}  \begin{document}  IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII hardware/software  \end{document}   This results in this output:    If \usepackage{listings} is commented out, the hyphenation rules return to normal:    And just to note, in the actual environment I'm working in, it will also hyphenate between hard•ware, while with listings enabled, it hyphenates hardware/•software, as in the first image:    Two questions:   Why is this happening? Is there a way to disable this? I don't really want this behaviour just because I'm typing code occasionally in a document.