will company match on 401K if employee exceed the limit Suppose an employee has a yearly salary of $100K and his/her company matches "50 percent match up to the first 6 percent", and the employee is contributing at a rate of 40%. The employee will reach his/her IRS limit of $19K by 6 months.  So for the last six month there will be no 401K deduction from his own salary. The question is, will the company will still match, or will the employee lose the 401K match for last 6 months?
Why do employers require you to spread your 401(k) contributions throughout the year to get the maximum match? I think the title says it all. I can't see any reason employers have to incentivize employees to contribute to their 401(k) evenly throughout the year. Instead couldn't they use a relatively simple formula that is based on how much of their income the employee has contributed to their 401(k) thus far for the year? If that or their current contribution is over the threshold, they get the match this pay period, even if they didn't contribute anything.  EDIT: To clarify, my employer matches 100% of the first 3% of my contribution and 50% of the next 2%. The match is added every pay period along with my contribution. I am pretty sure there is no "true-up" feature, so if I were to hit the $17.5K limit early, and not be able to contribute at least 5% of my salary, I would not get the full match. So I have to be careful to make my contributions evenly throughout the year to get the maximum match. Just trying to figure out my employer's motivation for requiring this.
Can humans eat grass? Can a human eat grass and digest it? Could it be possible to use it as food just like other plants such as wheat or beans? How i recover my icloud username and password I have two raster images, Boolean classified (1 or 2).  They overlap in given areas.   I need a raster that is only the overlapping sections.  Using Arcinfo 10.  Answer can only use raster methods, no converting to polygons, points, etc... Can Hooke's law be derived? Can we derive  from the theory of elasticity? I know it is not a fundamental law and therefore can be derived from more basic considerations. I think there's an unintended motivation for users to post questions to higher-traffic Stack Exchange sites rather than their more specific or appropriate lower-traffic ones.  I think I have a solution.  What motivated this suggestion for me was that I am confident that if users were to post Android design questions to  beta and/or , that they would likely not be noticed by the appropriate audience compared to the vast army of Android experts here on Stack Overflow.    There are plenty of Android questions on SO that really should be on one or both of the aforementioned sites.  Presently there is little motivation for users to start questions like this on the appropriate site.  Is there something we could do to cross-pollinate related sites?  For instance, what if we let certain tags span certain sites?  Obviously the selection would be controlled by high-reputation users.   There could also be a feature to show (or explicitly hide) certain questions from other sites regardless of the tags.  This could be controlled by lower-reputation users than the global tag since it wouldn't have much statistical impact.  For instance, the android-layout tag could by default span sites, but OPs and other users could eliminate from the Graphic Design site questions that are of a purely technical nature.  Users interested in Android tagged questions would see related questions on design and UE sites--whether they are searching, posting, or viewing a question through the related items.  This would help eliminate cross-site duplicates, and encourage people to post on the correct site in the first place.   For related question lists and search results, there could even be a specific cross-site icon  next to an off-site question to show that it's from UX, for example. Using \vfill between two texts works:  \newpage bla \vfill blabla   but it doesn't work if there is no text before it:  \newpage \vfill blabla   How can this be achieved? has been solved, in XeTeX, by this code:  \def\kright#1{\leavevmode #1\kern-\XeTeXglyphbounds3 \the\XeTeXcharglyph`#1 } \def\kleft#1{\leavevmode \kern-\XeTeXglyphbounds1 \the\XeTeXcharglyph`#1 #1}   which allows me to align text more precisely to the ink by accessing the side-bearing measurements (\XeTeXglyphbounds1 and 3).  This XeTeX dependency is currently the only thing stopping me from moving to LuaTeX (mainly for microtype). Is an equivalent function available in LuaTeX, or planned?    After reading a bit more on microtype, could the equivalent effect be achieved by an appropriately-tailored set of character protrusions? That way, my move to LuaTeX might be a lot simpler. Can't learn the third Word of Power from Wulfgar Show hidden files on Mac OS X Mojave using Terminal To see my /etc folder I've tried this command in Terminal:  sudo chflags nohidden /etc   followed by:  sudo defaults write com.apple.Finder AppleShowAllFiles true; killall Finder   also tried:  sudo defaults write com.apple.Finder AppleShowAllFiles YES; killall Finder   Neither of them seemed to work. Find $\lim\limits_{x \to \infty} \frac{x}{(\log{x})^n}$ Find $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \dfrac{x}{(\log{x})^n}$.   My book says that $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \dfrac{(\log{x})^n}{x} = \lim_{y \to \infty} \dfrac{y^n}{e^y} = 0$, but I don't see how that is true. Do these define metrics on $\mathbb{R}$? Gauss law and electric flux Can you please explain me what is electric flux. I know it is $\int\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf{S}$, but in many place its given flux means to flow. But how does electric field "flow"? Also if we assume its the electric field lines (can you also specify what exactly are these) are "flowing" how does $\int\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf{S}$ give the total electric field lines passing through that area? (can you please elaborate when you explain?)  Pls. I know it shouldn't come here but there is no page for electric flux. With the last update of Fallout Shelter, Bethesda has added these "limited time" quests.  Question is, how limited is that time exactly? What happens when the quests "end", will it still be possible to get the benefits? Can some one explain this terminology please I think I understand it but not completely sure.   I think pull down is where you place a resistor between +V and the other component and pull up is where you place the resistor between 0v and the component.    If I am completely wrong then let me know! Drawing a square root spiral I would like to install Ubuntu 14.04.02 LTS on my machine which currently has Mageia 4.1.   So, I have the following partitions: One for /, one for swap and one for /home.   I have some important data on /home which I wouldn't like to lose (I have backed them up, but I would prefer to keep them) after a clean install. I plan to reformat partitions one and two as above and keep the /home one.   Will I be able to tell Ubuntu to do so during an installation? By this I mean: Will it be able to recognize the /home partition and keep all its data intact while formatting the rest? And one more question: Will it be able to keep the users as they are our will I be forced to change them too? (I have the bad feeling that it won't be able to keep the users as they are...) Zero vector of a vector space I know that every vector space needs to contain a zero vector. But all the vector spaces I've seen have the zero vector actually being zero (e.g. $\mathbf{0}=\langle0,0,\ldots,0\rangle$). Can't the "zero vector" not involve zero, as long as it acts as the additive identity? If that's the case then are there any graphical representations of a vector space that does not contain the origin? I've been using SSH Tunnel manager to easily set up and stop port tunneling over SSH to various servers at my company. That saved me the pain of opening up a new terminal window which will hang out there just for the sake of having a tunnel open.  This worked great (well , sort of) but SSH Tunnel Manager is a PowerPC application. With Lion, it is not supported any more.  What is a good replacement? How do I check if an element is hidden in jQuery? Can it be proven that : If $a_n&gt;0$ and $\sum a_n$ converges then $na_n \to 0$ (without assuming $a_n$ is decreasing)  Please note This question does not require $a_n$ to be decreasing as condition,  Is it possible to prove $na_n \to 0$ without requiring $a_n$ to be decreasing? I keep thinking that $a_n&gt;0$ and $\sum a_n$ converging then that implies that $a_n$ must be decreasing anyway(not monotonically decreasing necessarily )  Is it possible that $a_n&gt;0$ and $\sum a_n$ converges then $na_n \not \to 0$?  There are already answered questions that assume $a_n$ to be decreasing as a requirement: (this question does not assume $a_n$ is decreasing)       was the post that made me ask this question, a counter example of monotonoic decreasingness of $a_n$ was given in comments by the OP.