topology broken after extruding the mesh Its a very simple question, I am not sure what will be the impact of this on rigging &amp; animation of my Organic Model. I was trying to extruding the circle and when I switched from Edit mode to object mode, I found that the mesh is broken (refer ciruclar mesh)   Does it have impact on my rigging &amp; animation &amp; or any other stage (like UV mapping)
Some mesh-edges in object-mode aren't displayed So I have been extruding a cube to make a low poly banana and when I go from edit to object mode half the edges don't appear as well as half is dark.      I tried looking for an solution couldn't find one and its making me feel like I am doing something wrong so I decided to come here.
What is the status of TTF support in Internet Explorer? Column and row padding in tables Limit $\lim\limits_{x\to0}{\frac{\ln{(e+x)}-e^x}{\cos^2{x} -e^x}}$ Why is saltatory conduction in myelinated axons faster than continuous conduction in unmyelinated axons? How does spacing apart sodium and potassium channels allow the action potential to travel faster down the axon? This is the reason always cited for saltatory conduction and myelination, but my mental model of conduction tells me that the density of ion gates along the axon should not affect the speed of the AP.   To illustrate, consider a myelinated axon. A wave of Na$^+$ from action potential site 1, a node of Ranvier, rushes into and quickly diffuses down the axon. (It travels in both directions, but backwards is still in the refractory period.) It diffuses through the myelinated region, its concentration always diminishing. Before it attenuates too much, however, it happens upon node of Ranvier 2, where it triggers another action potential. A new wave of Na$^+$ rushes in and the cycle repeats. This should be plain so far.  Now imagine that there is actually a node of Ranvier halfway between node 1 and 2, called node 1.5. The wave of Na$^+$, on its way to node 2, happens to trigger an action potential at node 1.5, from which a wave of Na$^+$ pours in and either boosts the original wave or replaces it by taking its momentum. Now the reinforced wave proceeds to node 2 and triggers it just as soon as, perhaps even sooner than, if node 1.5 had not existed. Repeatedly insert nodes at higher densities until the situation is simply lack of myelination, and we conclude that unmyelinated axons can transmit an action-potential-triggering wave of Na+ as fast as or faster than a myelinated one.  In short, my point of confusion is this: I cannot see how a higher density of gated channels can possibly slow down the wavefront of Na+ that triggers action potentials. If anything, the additional influxes of Na+ should speed up the all-important wavefront, assuming that new waves really "either boost the original wave or replace it by taking its momentum", and also assuming that the wavefront of Na$^+$ is really all-important for signal transmission, and also assuming that the mere presence of (voltage?) gated ion channels in the membrane does not significantly retard the wavefront.  But the usual explanation for why saltatory conduction is faster than continuous conduction (a fact I hope is empirically and unambiguously established) relies on the putative slowing effect of ion channels on the signal fore. Please explain this effect in more detail, if it is not a misconception. Parsing DD MM YY HH MM SS columns from TXT file using Python's pandas Galois group of the product of two fields being the product of Galois groups? I'm just wondering if the following theorem is reasonable and whether the proof is makes sense or not? Also I have an application of it which I was trying to do earlier but I made a lot of mistakes so I would be very grateful if anyone would give some comments on this in case I have some very strong misunderstandings about Galois theory.    Theorem Let $E_1$ and $E_2$ be Galois field extensions of $F$ with trivial intersection ($E_1 \cap E_2 = F$), then $E_1 E_2$ has Galois group $\text{Gal}(E_1/F) \times \text{Gal}(E_2/F)$.  Proof   $E_1$ and $E_2$ are splitting fields (over $F$) of some polynomials $f_1$ and $f_2$ so $E_1 E_2$ is the splitting field of $f_1 f_2$ over $F$ and therefore it is Galois and we are justified using the "Gal" notation. Let $\sigma_1 \in \text{Gal}(E_1/F)$ and $\sigma_2 \in \text{Gal}(E_2/F)$ then by the fundamental theorem of Galois theory we can lift these both into elements of $\text{Gal}(E_1 E_2/F)$. The claim is that $\sigma_1 \sigma_2 = \sigma_2 \sigma_1$, to see this consider an element $\alpha \in E_1$, we have both $\sigma_2 \alpha = \alpha$ and $\sigma_2 \sigma_1 \alpha = \sigma_1 \alpha$ because it is invariant with respect to $\sigma_2$, but we can combine these equalities to get $\sigma_1 \sigma_2 \alpha = \sigma_2 \sigma_1 \alpha$. Both groups $\text{Gal}(E_i/F)$ ($i = 1,2$) are included in $\text{Gal}(E_1 E_2/F)$ and the degrees say there are no more elements, furthermore since they commute we can conclude $\text{Gal}(E_1 E_2/F) = \text{Gal}(E_1/F) \times \text{Gal}(E_2/F)$.     So hopefully that theorem is, if not correct, fixable.. and can be used to prove that $\mathbb Q (\sqrt{a_1},\sqrt{a_2},\cdots,\sqrt{a_n})$ has Galois group $C_2^m$ ($m \le n$) over $\mathbb Q$? Prove: $$ (a+b)^\frac{1}{n} \le a^\frac{1}{n} + b^\frac{1}{n}, \qquad \forall n \in \mathbb{N} $$ I have have tried using the triangle inequlity $ |a + b| \le |a| + |b| $,  without any success. Here is the problem setup  \begin{equation} \begin{array}{c} \text{min} \hspace{4mm}  \mathbf{b}^{T}_{}\mathbf{A}^{}_{}\mathbf{b}^{}_{} \\ s.t \hspace{5mm} \mathbf{b} \in \mathbb{R}^{N} \\ \hspace{9mm}b_0=1\\ \hspace{62mm}b_i=b_{i-2}b_{i-1} \hspace{5mm} \forall \hspace{5mm} 2&lt;i\leq N-1 \end{array} \end{equation}  where $\mathbf{A}$ is a $N\times N$ positive semi-definite matrix  To handle $b_0=1$ constrain, I know I can introduce Lagrange multiplier in objective function  \begin{equation} \begin{array}{c} \text{min} \hspace{4mm}  \mathbf{b}^{T}_{}\mathbf{A}^{}_{}\mathbf{b}^{}_{} + \lambda(\mathbf{b}^{T}_{}\mathbf{u}^{}_{}-1) \end{array} \end{equation}  where $\mathbf{u}_{}^{}$ is a $N\times 1$ column vector and $u_0=1$ and $u_i=0 \forall 1&lt;i\leq N-1$.  But I dont know how to handle second set of constraints?   EDIT: Example  Let $N=4$. Therefore I am looking for $\mathbf{b}=[b_0 \quad b_1 \quad b_2 \quad b_3]^T = [1 \quad b_1 \quad b_2 \quad b_1b_2]^T$. How do I include $b_3=b_1b_2$ constraint in objective function Does an unplugged hard drive used for data archival deteriorate? If I were to archive data on a hard drive, unplug it, and set it on a (not dusty, temperature-controlled) shelf somewhere, would that drive deteriorate much?  How does the data retention of an unplugged hard drive compare to tapes? Comparison between bootstrap percentiles confidence interval and BCa confidence interval? I have generated a nonparametric percentiles bootstrap confidence interval ($32.27143, 51.08571$), and a BCA confidence interval ($33.26, 53.49$) with an initial sample size of $n=7$.  Evidently, the BCA interval is larger than the percentiles interval. Shouldn't the BCA interval be better than the percentiles interval (and by "better" I mean "smaller")? I noticed also that when the sample size is larger, for example $n=40$, BCa confidence interval decreases. How do I configure swappiness? E: The repository 'http//archive.canonical.com precise Release' is not signed Logging individual application network usage in Windows 7 There are many answers here detailing programs that will monitor and log internet usage for a pc, but I need that usage to be logged and broken down, detailing which applications consumed that data.  I've noted there are several that give a real-time feed of each application's data usage (NetLimiter, Win7 Resource Monitor), but I can't find one that will log such data.  Anyone know of one?  Need to track down which program is using up a friend's bandwidth! Short Story about interminable rain on Venus It's not All Summer in a Day.  This was a story about explorers on Venus, who are separated from their base (possibly they're lost, possibly they suffered equipment failure, possibly they're just traveling from base to base) and are slowly being driven insane because it never stops raining.  The story is old enough that Venus' clouds were still believed to indicate a wet climate.  I can't remember much more detail than that.  I have the impression that the narrator at one point either dreamed of or fantasized about walking into the destination base and being handed a very plush towel to dry off.  I can't remember the central plot points - only the (very wet) setting.  I would have read this in the late 1970's or early 1980's.  I thought it might be an H. Beam Piper short story but I've been through his catalog and don't see any likely suspects. Does $E = mc^2$ apply to photons? how to create a histogram in java Para 5, , by      If the Lord would show thee but this one   thing, -- that to use "thee" and "thou" to a particular person is   proper language, and Scripture language; and that to say "you," is   improper, and arose from pride, and nourisheth pride, and so is of the   world, and not of the Father; and thou should bow thy spirit to him in   this one thing, thou little thinkest what a work it would make within thee, and how strongly the spirit of darkness would fight against thy   subjection thereto. The Lord lead thee as he seeth good, and give thee   faithfully to follow; for else, if the Lord should lead in any thing,   and thou not follow in that thing, his Spirit would be grieved and   vexed thereby, and thy heart in danger of being hardened by the   deceitfulness of sin.   What is the Lord giving thee faithfully to follow?   The grey claims that the reader thinks little of the significance of stressing 'thee' and 'thou' over 'you'. So I'd guess that the Lord is giving 'thee' this caution? If I'm right, why is there no direct object in the bolded? I recognise grammatical differences in the 1600s, but still want to learn. Move all files within subfolders to parent folder Firstly, I'm aware there are tons of similar questions, and I know because I must have tried adapting at least 5 of them, but I'm still here asking because my crappy grasp of CMD (which I actually thought I was getting good at up until this point) is frustrating me with generic, unhelpful errors, and I can't understand what part of the syntax is wrong. This is likely due to the fact that other questions deal with the folder/filename structures of their respective OPs, and when I try to adapt the code to my own folder/file structure it refuses to work. Therefore, I'm here asking for a CMD for loop solution that'll actually work for my own file and folder structure.  I have a parent folder which contains many other folders, in which there are files:  Parent Folder      Subfolder            File1            File2      Subfolder            File1            File2      Subfolder            File1            File2   ...and so on.  I'm wanting to use a CMD for loop in combination with the move command to extract all the files in the subfolders to the parent folder, leaving each subfolder empty.  When giving the CMD for loop please break down what each part of the command is doing, as this'll help make sure I understand the code and hopefully minimise the trouble I have getting it to work for myself. How can I fix Print Composer errors due to huge file size? Regex to get string between curly braces