I am developing an Android application using sqlite database. I need to convert this sqlite dump to mysql using PHP which can be used in Web application. Any help will be appreciable. Thanks.
Anyone know a quick easy way to migrate a SQLite3 database to MySQL?
jQuery select and wrap textNode Is "performance" singular or also plural? Excel Date to String conversion What is a "closed" or "duplicate" question? Questions can be closed or marked as duplicates.  What does it mean for a question to be &quot;closed&quot;? What does it mean for a question to be marked as a &quot;duplicate&quot;? Who can close a question? What are the reasons for closing a question ? Is closure the end of the road for a question? When are closed questions eligible for deletion?   Related        For more information, see &quot;&quot; in the . Why does Captain America's Shield make noise? How to remove/apply all modifiers of one object in python Lets assume you have 1 object with 4 modifiers added to it. I am curious how one would approach the task to apply all or to delete all modifiers of a just selected object that has many modifiers already added.  The console reads out the modifier delete as  bpy.ops.object.modifier_remove(modifier="Box Right ")   So "Box Right " I might have to replace with something like active.object.modifier.name and then work each modifier off?  This would be very helpful when you want to generate a static mesh for animation or 3D printing. Unique constraint that allows empty values in MySQL Number of sigma algebras for set with 4 elements The following is exercise 8.2 in 3rd edition (and exercise 8.19 in 2nd edition) of Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.   Adding the total time derivative of a function of $q_i$ and t to the Lagrangian will not change the the Euler-Lagrangian equation. So if we make the following change to Lagrangian,   $$L'(q,\dot{q},t) = L(q,\dot{q},t) + \frac{dF(q_1,q_2,...,q_n,t)}{dt}$$ we can get  $$ \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial{L'}}{\partial{\dot{q_i}}} - \frac{\partial{L'}}{\partial{q_i}} = 0 $$ from  $$ \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{\dot{q_i}}} - \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{q_i}} = 0 $$  How can we get the corresponding Hamiltonian equation part? This is to prove  $$ \dot{p'_i} = \frac{\partial{H'}}{\partial q_i} $$ $$ -\dot{q_i} = \frac{\partial{H'}}{\partial p'_i}  $$  from   $$ \dot{p_i} = \frac{\partial{H}}{\partial q_i} $$ $$ -\dot{q_i} = \frac{\partial{H}}{\partial p_i}  $$ where $p'_i = \frac{\partial L'}{\partial \dot q_i}$.  Edit  The corresponding $H'$ is $$ H' = \sum_k{p'_k \dot{q_k}} - L' $$ where $p'_k = \frac{\partial L'}{\partial \dot q_k}$. Inequality $\left(a-1+\frac{1}b\right)\left(b-1+\frac{1}c\right)\left(c-1+\frac{1}a\right)\leq1$ $X$ is a topological space with no special properties.  If a space $X$ has no isolated points, then show the same for any dense subset of   $X$.  Thanks a lot. No sound in Ubuntu except at log in I installed Ubuntu 12.04 a month ago and am using it till now. I failed to notice that all this time there was no sound at all while running Ubuntu, even while playing a game in Wine. The weird thing is that only the startup sound comes when I log in (Indian/African drum tone), then comes the utter silence.  I tested both Digital Output (S/PDIF) and the speakers in the sound settings but can hear nothing.  Any help? How fast does electricity flow? Why is it considered a bad practice to omit curly braces? Why does everyone tell me writing code like this is a bad practice?  if (foo)     Bar();  //or  for(int i = 0 i &lt; count; i++)     Bar(i);   My biggest argument for omitting the curly braces is that it can sometimes be twice as many lines with them. For example, here is some code to paint a glow effect for a label in C#.  using (Brush br = new SolidBrush(Color.FromArgb(15, GlowColor))) {     for (int x = 0; x &lt;= GlowAmount; x++)     {         for (int y = 0; y &lt;= GlowAmount; y++)         {             g.DrawString(Text, this.Font, br, new Point(IconOffset + x, y));         }      }  }  //versus using (Brush br = new SolidBrush(Color.FromArgb(15, GlowColor)))     for (int x = 0; x &lt;= GlowAmount; x++)         for (int y = 0; y &lt;= GlowAmount; y++)             g.DrawString(Text, this.Font, br, new Point(IconOffset + x, y));   You can also get the added benefit of chaining usings together without having to indent a million times.  using (Graphics g = Graphics.FromImage(bmp)) {     using (Brush brush = new SolidBrush(backgroundColor))     {         using (Pen pen = new Pen(Color.FromArgb(penColor)))         {             //do lots of work         }     }  } //versus using (Graphics g = Graphics.FromImage(bmp)) using (Brush brush = new SolidBrush(backgroundColor)) using (Pen pen = new Pen(Color.FromArgb(penColor))) {     //do lots of work }     The most common argument for curly braces revolves around maintance programming, and the problems that would ensue by inserting code between the original if statement and its intended result:  if (foo)     Bar();     Biz();     Questions:   Is it wrong to want to use the more compact syntax which the language offers? The people that design these languages are smart, I can't imagine they would put a feature which is always bad to use. Should we or Shouldn't we write code so the lowest common denominator can understand and have no problems working with it?  Is there another argument that I'm missing? When I have these facts,   French coins were not found in the ruin. German coins were not found in the ruin.   which of these sentences are grammatically correct?  1.     No French and German coins were found in the ruin.   2.     No French or German coins were found in the ruin.   3.     No french nor German coins were found in the ruin.   I think 1 is correct but I'm not sure.  By the way, I can also say     Neither German nor French coins were found in the ruin.   Also, when you have an additional fact   Italian coins were not found in the ruin   which of these statements are grammatically correct?  1.     No French, German and Italian coins were found in the ruin.   2.     No French, German or Italian coins were found in the ruin.   3.     None of French, German and Italian coins were found in the ruin.   4.     None of French, German or Italian coins were found in the ruin.   Thanks, It is generally taught that  function as adjectives modifying a noun (or pronoun).  In a sentence such as:     A major accident occurred on our bus's route to school, making us late for class.   or     The gas tank exploded, sending shrapnel through the air.   are the participle phrases modifying their preceding clauses? (If not, what are they modifying?) Let $G = (\mathbb{C} - \{0\}, \cdot)$, a subgroup $U = \{x+yi \mid x^2 + y^2 = 1\}$. Use the Fundamental Theorem to show that $G/(\mathbb{R}_{&gt; 0},\cdot)$ is isomorphic to $U$ where $\mathbb{R}_{&gt; 0}$ denotes the positive reals.  I am struggling to find the correct mapping from $G$ to $U$ that results in the the kernel being the nonnegative reals under multiplication. I'm hoping to get help with this mapping then I can show it is a homomorphism and onto and can use the Fundamental Theorem. How to prove this sequent using natural deduction? How do I prove $$S\rightarrow \exists xP(x) \vdash \exists x(S\rightarrow P(x))$$ using natural deduction? Just an alignment of which axioms or rules that one could use would be much appreciated. Let $f(x) = x^2 \sin{\frac{1}{x}}$ for $x\neq 0$ and $f(0) =0$. (a) Use the basic properties of the derivative, and the Chain Rule to show that $f$ is differentiable at each $a\neq 0$ and calculate $f'(a)$. You may use without proof that $\sin$ is differentiable and that $\sin' =\cos$.  Not even sure what this is asking.  (b) Show that $f$ is differentiable at $0$ and that $f'(0) =0$.  $\frac {f(x)-f(0)}{x-0} \to \lim_{x \to 0} x \sin(1/x)$. $x \sin(1/x) \leq |x|$ and $\lim_{x \to 0} |x|=0$. Thus $f(x)$ is differentiable at $0$; moreover $f^{'}(0)=0$.  (c) Show that $f'$ is not continuous at $0$.  $f{'}(x)=x^{2} \cos(1/x) (-x^{-2}) + 2x \sin (1/x)$. In pieces: $\lim_{x \to 0} \cos (1/x)$. $f^{'}(0-)$ nor $f{'}(0+)$ exists as $x \to 0$ $f^{'}(x)$ oscillates infinity between $-1$ and $1$ with ever increase frequency as $x \rightarrow 0$ for any $p&gt;0$ $[-p,0]$, $[-p,p]$ or $[0,p]$ $f$ is not continuous. Question: How to show more rigorously? The probability $P(X=n)$ that an event X takes place $n$ times in a fixed period of time follows the Poisson distribution with parameter $\lambda$ i.e.  $$ P(X = n) = e^{-\lambda} \frac{\lambda ^ n}{n!}$$  I have to evaluate the probability that the event $X$ takes place an even number of times. I know that:   $$ P(X \text{ is even} ) = e^{-\lambda} \cdot \sum_{k=0}^{+\infty} \frac{\lambda^{2k}}{(2k)!}$$  but I can't solve the series.  I guess that I have to use the fact that $e^\lambda = \sum_{n = 0}^{+\infty} \lambda^n/n!$, but I got stuck.  How can I evaluate $P(X \text{ is even})$ (alternative solutions appreciated).