Sometimes I get a space between the LaTeX logo and the adjacent word and other times I don't see any spacing. How to fix this?
I have a definition:  \newcommand{\arnold}{Arnold Schwarzenegger}   When I refer to it by:  \arnold is a   it is rendered as:   Arnold Schwarzeneggeris a    In order to have a space in front of "is" I would need to write  \arnold\ is a   Is there some other shorter way?
Why Listen to Music, why not Listening Music Distribution of the maximum of two correlated normal variables A person has a computer with no HDD but 16GB RAM and USB3 port.  Also has 16GB USB3 pendrive with Ubuntu Live on it, (Non persistent).  The computer is then started with the pendrive using toram.  The pendrive is then removed and reinserted while the O/S is running.  Is the O/S that is running in RAM able to do a "Full" install to the pendrive?  This was asked in:     However for some reason this unique question was marked as "Duplicate". How to change the disk space left warning in Windows 7? my disk has over 100GB of free space, but the usage bar in Computer is displayed in red, as if it reached a low space limit. It looks like Windows applies the same 10% or 15% hard disk space value for low space warnings, regardless of if the disk is 50GB in size or 1.5TB, which is not very smart and obsolete for most recent computers.  Is there a Registry key or some place I can change this percentage so the usage bar displays in green, not red?  The hibernation and page files are already reserved (5GB together), so surely the low space warning for a 1.5TB disk should be 5-10GB, not 150GB or more. The way Windows 7 computes the low space limit seems pretty dumb, not much Intellisense there.  This is not a high priority issue, but it makes the Computer applet look pretty stupid and it's irritating every day to see that 100GB of free space is putting my computer in the red. It would also be nice to be able to edit this low limit percentage in Computer/Manage/Storage/Disk Management or directly in the disk properties ("Tools" tab). Find $P(12)$ when $P(x)={1\over(x+1)}$, for $x=0,1,2,......11$ let $P(x)$ be a polynomial of degree $11$ such that  $P(x)={1\over(x+1)}$, for $x=0,1,2,......11$  then find value of $P(12)$ Am I Running as a Service How should ip2long converted IP's be stored in MySQL? What exactly are the Python scoping rules?  If I have some code:  code1 class Foo:    code2    def spam.....       code3       for code4..:        code5        x()   Where is x found?  Some possible choices include the list below:   In the enclosing source file In the class namespace In the function definition In the for loop index variable Inside the for loop   Also there is the context during execution, when the function spam is passed somewhere else. And maybe  pass a bit differently?  There must be a simple reference or algorithm somewhere.  It's a confusing world for intermediate Python programmers. Is a hash a zero-knowledge proof? I’m trying to wrap my head around zero knowledge proofs, but I’m having trouble understanding it.  In my current understanding, zero-knowledge proofs prove to the recipient that the sender has a certain knowledge without disclosing it. Like trying to say your password without actually giving it.  Many sources go at it with a convoluted method like a tunnel where there’s a hidden gate, and Bob is trying to know if Alice can go through the hidden gate. But then it starts saying that Bob should not see Alice enter. Wouldn’t it be easier for Bob to just see Alice go in one tunnel and come out the other? That would not disclose the secret way of opening the tunnel, right?  In that line of thinking, given a one-way function like a hash, couldn’t the other person just hash their secret and let the other see that the hashes compare?  I must be missing something (as there’s a lot of research going into it and hashes are well-known), but I can’t wrap my head around it.  Can someone tell me what’s wrong with my understanding of zero knowledge proofs? How can multithreading speed up an application (when threads can't run concurrently)? How can I check the version of the available package in the Ubuntu repositories without installing it? Duplicates in sendable DE for MobileConnect Should we always override equals? There was a reason why I constantly failed physics at school and university, and that reason was, apart from the fact I was immensely lazy, that I mentally refused to &quot;believe&quot; more advanced stuff until I understand the fundamentals (which I, eventually, never did). As such, one of the most fundamental things in physics that I still don't understand (a year after dropping out from the university) is the concept of . No one cared to explain what a field actually is, they just used to throw in a bunch of formulas and everyone was content. The school textbook definition for a field (electromagnetic in this particular case, but they were similar), as I remember it, goes like:  An electromagnetic field is a special kind of substance by which charged moving particles or physical bodies with a magnetic moment interact.  A special kind of substance, are they for real? This sounds like the authors themselves didn't quite understand what a field is so they decided to throw in a bunch of buzzwords to make it sounds right. I'm fine with the second half but a special kind of substance really bugs me, so I'd like to focus on that. Is a field material? Apparently, it isn't. It doesn't consist of particles like my laptop or even the light. If it isn't material, is it real or is it just a concept that helps to explain our observations? While this is prone to speculations, I think we can agree that in scope of this discussion particles actually do exist and laws of physics don't (the latter are nothing but human ideas so I suspect Universe doesn't &quot;know&quot; a thing about them, at least if we're talking raw matter and don't take it on metalevel where human knowledge, being a part of the Universe, makes the Universe contain laws of physics). Any laws are only a product of human thinking while the stars are likely to exist without us homo sapiens messing around. Or am I wrong here too? I hope you already see why I hate physics. Is a field not material but still real? Can something &quot;not touchable&quot; by definition be considered part of our Universe by physicists? I used to imagine that a &quot;snapshot&quot; of our Universe in time would contain information about each particle and its position, and this would've been enough to &quot;de&quot; it but I guess my programmer metaphors are largely off the track. (Oh, and I know that the uncertainty principle makes such (de)serialization impossible — I only mean that I thought the Universe can be &quot;defined&quot; as the set of all material objects in it). Is such assumption false? At this point, if fields indeed are not material but are part of the Universe, I don't really see how they are different from  except for perhaps a more geeky flavor. When I talked about this with the teacher who helped me to prepare for the exams (which I did pass, by the way, it was before I dropped out), she said to me that, if I wanted hardcore definitions,  a field is a function that returns a value for a point in space.  Now this finally makes a hell lot of sense to me but I still don't understand how mathematical functions can be a part of the Universe and shape the reality. What uses are there for "placement new"? Has anyone here ever used C++'s "placement new"? If so, what for? It looks to me like it would only be useful on memory-mapped hardware. When is $\mathbb{F}_p[x]/(x^2-2)\simeq\mathbb{F}_p[x]/(x^2-3)$ for small primes? How to pronounce "Moderators's"? If I want to use the plural of &quot;moderator&quot; and also add the apostrophe plus S, how do I pronounce it? How do native speakers pronounce it?  Moderators = moderatorz Moderators's = moderatorziz or just moderatorz?  A sentence is:  &quot;I always thought that moderators's decisions seemed fairly arbitrary.&quot;   I guess moderatorziz is correct but it sounds weird to me. Do native speakers pronounce it as moderatorziz? How to run ffmpeg from command line in android Inspired by  I was wondering why the Half Blood Prince left his book as a class copy. One would think that it was precious to him, since he invested so much in it. He made up potions and spells up by his own. I would expect him to keep it to himself. Both, because of the personal value of it, and to prevent others to (as happened at last) use his work (misguided and/or against him).  Is there any canon explanation why his book was left as class copy? Will links to images be kept permanently when added to a comment and nothing else? I assume, that Stack Exchange have some clean-up subsystem, which deletes all "abandoned" images (stored at i.stack.imgur.com), that is, all of them, that were initially uploaded, but no post is actually having link to them. Am I right?  If such subsystem is implemented and is doing its job on regular basis, then what about following scenario:   Start a new question or answer, anywhere. Hit button and upload an image. Copy generated image's URL  to clipboard. Close tab and drop editing post. Go to question on answer, you actually planned to reply. Post a comment to it and paste copied image's URL from clipboard to comment's body.   Will uploaded image, with URL pasted only to comment, be kept permanent? Does clean-up subsystem (if exitst) take care of checking for image's URLs in comments as well?