I frequently upvote someone's comment only to realise I've fat-fingered it (especially easy to do on a touch phone, but I've also done it with a mouse) and clicked someone else's comment.  Unfortunately I can't find a way to undo it!  The last thing I want to do is upvote someone I vehemently disagree with ;)
As mentioned on :     For something that can be done so   easily by accident, there should be   the ability to undo mistakes.   I know that I have clicked several times on a comment up-vote without actually wanting to.  I would suggest being able to cancel the up-vote (maybe only for a couple of minutes or even less than a minute, no problem, as long as I can undo a miss-click).
Similar to Lifepod 1993, but not it This film is very similar to Lifepod 1993, but it takes place in a large ship, not a pod.  I can remember three characters... a technical engineer, being the one sabotaging the ship. And also this military cut character (who looks a lot like Kane from Mortal Kombat) and another girl (I think it was long, wavy black hair).  The "plot" twist that sends this one apart, at least back in the 1990´s, is that the ending comes to the fact there is only enough food and oxygen for one survivor and no escape pods or cryotubes, only a device that "could" work as a cryotube. For some reason that I cant remember the "Kane" dude chooses to die instead, by taking poison (which had been previously used on other surviving members). But the girl "tricks" him and drugs him instead, then places him in the "cryotube" and she stays awake to await for the rescue team.  Of course, they get salvaged, and he is still okay, surprised that she tricked him and saved him. Rings a bell for anyone? Is definitely a B-movie. What is the non-parametric equivalent of a two-way ANOVA that can include interactions? Is the "the ... the ..." construction governed by some grammatical rule? a) The more I study, the less I learn. b) More I study, less I learn.  Could we rewrite the sentence shown under the letter a) in the form shown under the letter b) without breaking any grammatical rule? If not, why not? Water Wars: Time Travel TV Show? We all know very well how to make an angle of 15 and 45 degree and its multiple using compass. Can anybody tell me how to make an angle of 10 degree and its multiple using compass? Why would you not want to rollover a previous employer's 401(k) when changing jobs? Are there any valid reasons to not rollover a former 401(k) when changing jobs?  I have several little ones that I never quite got around to rolling together - with an upcoming job change, should they all be combined into my new employer's retirement plan?  If not, what else might be considered? Good evening! I'm studing something about finite fields and I didn't find anything that can answer my question.  I have a finite field $\mathbf{F}_q$ and the equation to solve is $x^n=a$. Which are the condition to resolve this equation? For which values of $q, n, a$ there exist a solution?  I will be very happy if anyone can answer this question, possibly with a reference of a book (or an article) that explai this with more details.  Thank in advance to everyone who can answer this one, I really need to understand this. How to add 30 minutes to a JavaScript Date object? Convergence of $\int_0^\infty \sin(t)/t^\gamma \mathrm{d}t$ For what values of $\gamma\geq 0$ does the improper integral $$\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin(t)}{t^\gamma} \mathrm{d}t$$ converge?   In order to avoid two "critical points" $0$ and $+\infty$ I've thought that it would be easier to test the convergence of the sum (is this coherent?): $$ \int_0^1 \frac{\sin(t)}{t^\gamma}\mathrm{d}t + \int_1^\infty \frac{\sin(t)}{t^\gamma}\mathrm{d}t. $$ For the second integral, it converges if $\gamma &gt; 1$ (comparision) and also converges if $0 &lt;\gamma \leq 1$. I'm stuck on proving the last part and the fact that the first integral converges for $\gamma &lt; 2$. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.  PD: I've checked the answers for  but I would not like to solve this integral using $(n\pi,(n+1)\pi)$ intervals. Wrap text at any point if normal hyphenation not possible bash function cannot change the value of a local variable when called by $() The following code works differently depending on which way Parse_Short_Switches() is called.  After calling the function 'Parse_Short_Switches' by using result=$(Parse_Short_Switches), the value of $error_flag is NOT set to -1 as I would expect.  After calling the function 'Parse_Short_Switches' by simply using Parse_Short_Switches, the the value of $error_flag is set to -1 as I would expect.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks  #!/bin/bash  function Parse_Short_Switches() { echo "error_flag inside of the function= $error_flag" 1&gt;&amp;2 error_flag="-1" echo "blah blah ..." }  # --- MAIN --- error_flag="999" echo "error_flag= $error_flag" #result=$(Parse_Short_Switches) Parse_Short_Switches echo "error_flag= $error_flag" How to print fields value in views-view.html.twig in drupal 8 How to print fields value in views-view.html.twig I have created a views-view.html.twig file for my view slider_3. The template name is 'views-view--slider_3.html.twig' The view formatting is done by this template, but I need a field is come at begging position of the view:  &lt;div class="slider-3-main"&gt;{{ rows.required_field }} &lt;div{{ attributes.addClass(classes) }}&gt;   {{ title_prefix }}   {% if title %}     {{ title }}   {% endif %}   {{ title_suffix }}    How can be the field will written to display at {{ rows.required_field }} Consider numbers of the type $n=2^m+1$. Prove that such an n is prime only if $n=F_K$ for some $ k \in N$, where $F_k$ is a Fermat Prime. Consider numbers of the type $n=2^m+1$. Prove that such an $n$ is prime only if $n=F_K$ for some $ k \in N$, where $F_k$ is a Fermat Prime. Consider numbers of the type $n=a^m-1$ where $a&gt;1$ is a natural number. Prove that such an $n$ is prime only if $n=M_p$ for p-prime, where $M_p$ is a Mersennt Prime.   I do not understand what the question is asking me for. Can I get some clarification? I've just upgraded from Ubuntu 18.04 to its newest LTS version - 20.04. While it comes with some interesting changes, the Desktop icon system was messed up in my opinion. When you hover the mouse cursor over the icons, you see a huge space marked around them that cannot be violated (as you can see in the image below) so that they need to be placed very far apart from each other.  18.04 allowed you to place icons much closer to each other and didn't have that marked space around them. This new way leaves much less space on the Desktop to organize large amounts of icons - including folders, files and shortcuts. Is there a way I can significantly reduce the size of icons and their "spaces" or go back to the old system of organizing files? On "Settings", there is a tool to change the size of Dock icons, but not of Desktop icons.  Also, every time I move or delete something, the Desktop "flashes" and the icons seem to rearrange themselves automatically, nothing of which happened in 18.04. I also can't move anything directly to the Desktop; I need to move to the Desktop folder on Nautilus. This makes me start to think about downgrading Ubuntu back to 18.04. How to replace the first occurence in an expression instead of replacing all? Why does the zoom sometimes stop at a point? I am looking at  (dual low-voltage power amplifier). On the fourth page, there is a sample circuit; right at the V+ input there is a symbol that looks like a capacitor. However, it looks like it is shaded in. What is that? Why does locking the rear tires on a vehicle cause it to spin? are often used in motor-sports and stunt driving to turn around tight corners.  Essentially, the driver applies the handbrake as he enters the turn, in order to "kick out" the back end and slide the vehicle around the corner.  However, applying the handbrake hard enough to lock the rear wheels while traveling straight will cause the rear of the vehicle to "kick out".  Given enough speed, the vehicle will spin 180 degrees.  Why do sliding wheels on a car want to "get in front" of rolling wheels? Possible Duplicate:          As a English non-native speaker it is difficult for me to understand when I must use present perfect or past simple because in my official language there isn't the present perfect tense. I know that present perfect is related to something that happened in the past but its result is important now. But for instance:        The message has been sent.   The message was sent.      Please help me point me out any examples/contexts where I should use 1. instead of 2. Prove by induction that $(x+1)^n - nx - 1$ is divisible by $x^2$ Basis step has already been completed. I've started off with the inductive step as just $n=k+1$, trying to involve $f(k)$ into it so that the left over parts can be deducible to be divisible by $x^2$ but getting stuck on this inductive step.