Adobe Forms Central had a decent level of security. I've been told some software providers state in T&amp;C's that they own the data you submit!  What's the score with Cognito?  Is submission content encrypted?
Some forms may contain confidential information - even something basic like where a person lives.   What measures do Cognito Forms take to ensure that data stored within its site is secure?
Alternative version of the Final Value theorem for Laplace Transform Redirect the output using `sudo` I have a small question regarding using sudo with output redirect &gt;. To enable IP forwrding, someone can use the command:  echo 1 &gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward   Executing this command will give permission denied as it requires root privileges. However, executing the same command with sudo gives also permission denied error! It seems that output redirect &gt; does not inherit the permissions of the preceding command echo. Is this right?  As a workaround I do:  echo 1 | sudo tee /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward   Is this the best way to do it? Am I missing something?  Please, note that this is an example and it applies to all commands that use output redirect. Interval preserving transformations are linear in special relativity Would fewer Jedi be more powerful? I'm teaching my self topology with the aid of a book. I'm trying to prove the following is a topology:     Let X be an infinite set. Show that $\mathscr{T}_2=\{U \subseteq X : U = \emptyset $ or $ X\setminus U $ is countable$ \} $ is a topology.   My book calls this set the ""  Please let me know if my proof is valid.     corollary [A]: The union of countable sets are countable.    proof: I'm going to take as a given that that the union of finite set are finite, and just prove the case of . A set is countable infinite if there is a bijection between the set and the natural numbers. Let $A$ and $B$ be a countable infinite sets. Now let $f$ be the bijection between $A$ and $\mathbb{N}$ and $g$ be $B$'s bijection.  $f:\mathbb{N}  \rightarrow  A$  $g:  \mathbb{N}  \rightarrow B$  There can always exist a bijection $h$ that maps $A \cup B $ to $\mathbb{N}$. To account for non disjoint sets, let $B' = B \setminus A$; (note: $A \cup B = A \cup B'$)  $h:  \mathbb{N}   \rightarrow  A \cup B'$  $ h(x) = \left\{         \begin{array}{ll}             f(\frac{1}{2}x); &amp; \quad x \in 2\mathbb{N} \\             g(\frac{x+1}{2}); &amp; \quad x \in 2\mathbb{N}+1         \end{array}     \right. $   $h^{-1}(x)$ would map $A$ to the even numbers, and $B'$ to the odd numbers.  Therefore, The union of countable sets are countable. (QED)  Now to verify the definition.     (i) X and Ø are elements of $\mathscr{T}$.   Ø is given in the definition of $\mathscr{T}_2$. Also, the empty set is considered finite, with cardinality zero. Thus $X$ is in $\mathscr{T}_1$ because its complement is finite, and finite numbers are countable.      (ii) $\mathscr{T}$ is closed under finite intersections.   Let:$V_k \subseteq X$ be any countable set. (ie: $V_1, V_2...$ are all countable sets)  So Then, $U_k = X \setminus V_k$, would be the subsets of $\mathscr{T}_2$.  $U_k \cap U_j = X \setminus (V_k \cup V_j) $, due to De Morgan's law.   Thus, $U_k \cap U_j \in  \mathscr{T}_2$, since the Union of two countable sets is also countable[A]. And This reasoning can be extended to any finite amount of intersections.       (iii) $\mathscr{T}$ is closed under arbitrary unions.   Let $A=\bigcup_{i \in I} U_i$ be an arbitrary union of sets whose complements are are countable.Then by De Morgan's law, $A=X \setminus (\bigcap_{i \in I}V_i)$, for some countable sets $V_i$. By the definition of intersection, $\bigcap_{i \in I}V_i \subseteq V_i$ for all $i \in I$. Since $V_i$ is countable so is any of its subsets.  Hence the complement of $A$ is countable. Software center not loading software lists how can i automatically record every terminal session? Add review queues to Android app I know there are some similar posts on adding review queues to the mobile web page. However, this is regarding the Stack Exchange Android app. I really would like to review posts and edits from the Android app, however this isn't included in the app yet. I'm not sure how it would be implemented; maybe there could be a button or something for review. Could we please see this? "Images with street signs" CAPTCHA impossible to solve Can Git hook scripts be managed along with the repository? Grandi's Series; tends to $1/2$, but why is this considered a valid sum? How can I serialize an object to JSON without properties that are null? To communicate with a REST interface on a private system, I need to send a JSON message from a trigger. I have a message object that has some fields, lists and a child object:  public class MerchantConfig {  public class MIDConfig {     public String mid;     public String currencyCode;     public String cardTemplateName;     public String paymentPanelRestriction;     public List&lt;String&gt; restrictedCountries;      public String paymentPanelRestrictionForCountries; }  public String merchantName; public String sopgTemplateName; public Integer dispositionTimeWindowInMinutes; public List&lt;String&gt; features; public Boolean activateImmediately; public List&lt;MIDConfig&gt; midConfiguration; }   I can serialize it to JSON using the built-in serializer:  String body = JSON.serializePretty([MerchantConfig instance]);   The result:  {   "sopgTemplateName" : null,   "midConfiguration" : [ {     "restrictionCountries" : [ "DE", "AT" ],     "paymentPanelRestrictionForCountries" : "MANDATORY",     "paymentPanelRestriction" : "OPTIONAL",     "mid" : "1000000001",     "currencyCode" : "EUR",     "cardTemplateName" : null   }, {     "restrictionCountries" : [ ],     "paymentPanelRestrictionForCountries" : "",     "paymentPanelRestriction" : "OPTIONAL",     "mid" : "1000000002",     "currencyCode" : "USD",     "cardTemplateName" : null   }, {     "restrictionCountries" : [ ],     "paymentPanelRestrictionForCountries" : "",     "paymentPanelRestriction" : "PROHIBITED",     "mid" : "1000000003",     "currencyCode" : "AUD",     "cardTemplateName" : null   } ],   "merchantName" : "Test Merchant",   "features" : [ XYZ ],   "dispositionTimeWindowInMinutes" : 10,   "activateImmediately" : true }   How can I serialize this object so that all properties that are null don't show up in the JSON string?   In this example, "sopgTemplateName" and all "cardTemplateName" properties are null and should not appear in the JSON string. The empty list "restrictionCountries" should still appear as an empty list, though. How to do multiple joins when using groupby in linq For what values $s$ does $\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x^s}dx$ converge? For what values $s$ does $\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x^s}dx$ converge?  Solution says $0&lt;s&lt;2$.  Any ideas? Simple one really.  In SQL, if I want to search a text field for a couple of characters, I can do:  SELECT blah FROM blah WHERE blah LIKE '%text%'   The documentation for App Engine makes no mention of how to achieve this, but surely it's a common enough problem? Schengen visa category required for job interview Limit of $\prod\limits_{k=2}^n\frac{k^3-1}{k^3+1}$ Calculate $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{2^3-1}{2^3+1}\times \frac{3^3-1}{3^3+1}\times \cdots \times\frac{n^3-1}{n^3+1}$$ No idea how to even start. What do I set the 'Opens with...' property to in order to get the system to run .bat files again (when they are double-clicked)?  Somehow my boss convinced his workstation that the handler for .bat files was supposed to be Word. Now, when double-clicking .bat files, they're opened up in Word. "Reality" of length contraction in SR I was in argument with someone who claims that length contraction is not &quot;real&quot; but only &quot;apparent&quot;, that the measurement of a solid rod in its rest reference frame is the &quot;real length&quot; of the rod and all other measurements are somehow just &quot;artificial&quot; and &quot;apparent&quot;. Seemed to me like a bad conversation about poorly defined words and not really relevant to physics, but then some quotes were offered:  ...so that the back appears closer to the front. But of course nothing has happened to the rod itself.  (Rindler)  The effects are apparent (that is, caused by the motion) in the same sense that proper quantities have not changed.  (Resnick &amp; Halliday) At the same time, the  insists that length contraction and time dilation are &quot;real&quot;, with observable consequences:  Time and space dilation are often referred to as ‘perspective effects’ in discussions of STR. Objects and processes are said to ‘look’ shorter or longer when viewed in one inertial frame rather than in another. It is common to regard this effect as a purely ‘conventional’ feature, which merely reflects a conventional choice of reference frame. But this is rather misleading, because time and space dilation are very real physical effects, and they lead to completely different types of physical predictions than classical physics. [...] However, this does not mean that time and space dilation are not real effects. They are displayed in other situations where there is no ambiguity. One example is the twins' paradox, where proper time slows down in an absolute way for a moving twin. And there are equally real physical effects resulting from space dilation. It is just that these effects cannot be used to determine an absolute frame of rest.  I went through a lot of Einstein, Minkowski and Lorentz original material, and didn't find anything about what is &quot;real&quot; and what is not. Finally, I know about muons, where the effects of SR seem to be very real (from , but I had seen it in a physics class before):  When a cosmic ray proton impacts atomic nuclei in the upper atmosphere, pions are created. These decay within a relatively short distance (meters) into muons (their preferred decay product), and muon neutrinos. The muons from these high energy cosmic rays generally continue in about the same direction as the original proton, at a velocity near the speed of light. Although their lifetime without relativistic effects would allow a half-survival distance of only about 456 m (2,197 µs×ln(2) × 0,9997×c) at most (as seen from Earth) the time dilation effect of special relativity (from the viewpoint of the Earth) allows cosmic ray secondary muons to survive the flight to the Earth's surface, since in the Earth frame, the muons have a longer half life due to their velocity. From the viewpoint (inertial frame) of the muon, on the other hand, it is the length contraction effect of special relativity which allows this penetration, since in the muon frame, its lifetime is unaffected, but the length contraction causes distances through the atmosphere and Earth to be far shorter than these distances in the Earth rest-frame. Both effects are equally valid ways of explaining the fast muon's unusual survival over distances.  So which is which? Why do Rindler, Resnick &amp; Halliday use the word &quot;apparent&quot;? How do you style an input type="file" button?