In the anniversary update to Windows 10, Microsoft got rid of regular Skype and only has Skype Preview. Is there a way I can get back regular Skype?
Windows 8 skype is terrible.  They've removed many buttons, most of the preferences, and have in general made it impossibly oversimplified and difficult to use.  Old Skype was fine when I had windows 7.  Is there any way to get it back on Windows 8?
Is a contradiction enough to prove a set equality to $\varnothing$? Suppose we have $x^2+4x+3=0$  We differentiate both sides to get $2x+4=0$.  So $x=-2$  But $(-2)^2+4(-2)+3=0$   $4-8+3=-1$ is not equal to $0$.  Which tells that we cannot differentiate equalities. But in many proofs, like in integral calculus, differentiating both sides occurs. So, where is the fallacy? Closing Reject Suggested Edit dialogue freezes review process Does Blender support dual-GPU rendering if the two GPUs aren't the same? I have a GTX 1060 6GB in my current build, and I also have a GTX 960 2GB in storage. I was wondering if I got , and got both of my GPUs in one build (not SLI or CrossFire, just in the same system) would I be able to use both GPUs for rendering simultaneously? I don't care if this means having them both render separate tiles in one instance of Blender, or rendering separate frames in two instances. I'm using Cycles for everything I do. How could Argus Filch clean up the whole castle by himself without magic? Active Web Site as Gnome Background Is there a way to put an active website, such as Gmail, as your Desktop background in Gnome, running Ubuntu 10.10 64-bit? MS Win calls it "Active Desktop". How do I "Show total up and down vote counts" since I'm at 1K rep? Is $\{0\}$ a field? Consider the set $F$ consisting of the single element $I$.  Define addition and multiplication such that $I+I=I$ and $I \times I=I$ .  This ring satisfies the field axioms:   Closure under addition.  If $x, y \in F$, then $x = y = I$, so $x + y = I + I = I \in F$. Closure under multiplication.  $x \times y = I \times I = I \in F$ Existence of additive identity.  $\forall x \in F$ (i.e., for $x=I$), $x + I = x$, so $I$ is the additive identity. Existence of mulitiplicative identity. $\forall x \in F, x \times I = x$, so $I$ is the multiplicative identity. Additive inverse. $\forall x \in F, \exists y = I \in F: x + y = I$ Multiplicative inverse. $\forall x \in F, \exists y = I \in F: x \times y = I$.  However, because the additive identity need not have a multiplicative inverse, this is a vacuous truth. Commutativity of addition.  $\forall x, y \in F, x + y = I = y + x$ Commutativity of multiplication.  $\forall x, y \in F, x \times y = I = y \times x$ Associativity of addition.  $\forall x, y, z \in F$, $(x + y) + z = I + I = I$ and $x + (y + z) = I + I = I$, so $(x + y) + z = x + (y + z)$ Associativity of multiplication.  $\forall x, y, z \in F$, $(x \times y) \times z = I \times I = I$ and $x \times (y \times z) = I \times I = I$, so $(x \times y) \times z = x \times (y \times z)$ Distributivity of multiplication over addition. $I \times (I + I) = I$ and $I \times I + I \times I = I$, so $\forall x,y,z \in F, x(y+z) = xy+xz$   Based on the above, $\{I\}$ seems to qualify as a field.  If $I$ is assumed to be a real number, then the unique solution of $I + I = I$ and $I \times I = I$ is, of course, $I = 0$.  So, is {0} a field, or is there generally considered to be an additional field axiom which would exclude it?  Specifically, is it required for the multiplicative identity to be distinct from the additive identity? I've been told that I should use simple past in reported speech when the direct speech is in simple present such as I **am** the best   ~>   He said he **was** the best  but what happens for imperative mood direct speech     "Mom said dont trust strangers"   Or     "Mom said didn't trust strangers"   I think I should maintain the first form. But I'm not sure. And I'm not even sure this relates to the sentence mood. I need the best choice and a further explaination for this :) Is a 1st-level spell cast using a 4th-level slot a 1st-level spell, or a 4th-level spell? PHP error in .xml file? Rich Snippets not working (and working at the same time?) How does the simulation hypothesis relate to the ethics of simulated violence? Say, for the sake of this question,  is real. Are we then hurting "persons"/conscious beings in "our simulations" - video games - when we fight them? Why (not)? If so, is this unethical? Think for example about shooting an alien in the game No Man's Sky.  Edit/answer on the comment of Joseph Weissman: My reasoning is like this:   It is unethical to harm a person (with a person being everything that has ). By the simulation hypothesis (assuming it's true), everything around us (everything that we know of), is simulated. By 1 and 2, all persons we know of are simulated. So it's unethical to harm the simulated persons around us. A game is a simulation just like we are in a simulation, so the game has simulated persons. Therefore -  - it's unethical to harm the persons in a video game.   I know that the premises - besides the simulation hypothesis itself - are debatable, but that's the reason I asked the question in the first place.  I was also thinking that the characters in the video game differ because they have far less to no intelligence, that much of it is scripted. But I neither have a proof that we ourselves aren't scripted, with free will being an illusion. Also, how intelligent does a character in a simulation/video game has to be to have personhood then? I think this is a case of the .  Just to be sure, please note that this question is not about whether the simulation hypothesis is true or how likely it is to be true. It is about (one of the) consequences if the simulation hypothesis is true. It's also not a question about violence in games in general. Can I have a unique UV map for each frame? Photoelectric effect intensity I understand the PE effect quite well but I'm failing to understand one thing. Intensity is the amount of energy per second incident to a given area.   So can you can increase the intensity by either increasing the electrical energy or making the area smaller? By increasing the electrical energy, what exactly is happening?  I assume that by increasing intensity you are increasing the number of photons incident to an area of the metal thus increasing the rate of photoelectric emission. But why doesn't increasing intensity via more electrical power lead to greater energy of the electrons, if by increasing intensity you are increasing the energy of the incident waves?  I understand the results but I'm trying to understand why the intensity works the way it is thanks Will my checked luggage freeze in the airplane? I'm taking some freeze-sensitive items in a checked luggage for a short flight. It's cheese, chocolate, toothpaste and wine. I would like to know whether the luggage can get "frozen" in the aircraft. Sometimes it happened to me that my stuff actually was quite cold after the flight, so I'd like to be quite sure. Especially the cheese was really expensive and freezing it would very likely demage it.  Usually I pack everything well in clothes, but this time the things are just too many so it's tough to do more than just protect the wine from breaking.  Some details: It's an A320 flight taking 1.5 hours, with Czech Airlines, from Paris CDG to Prague PRG. I would like to install  chat platform on my Ubuntu 12.04 LTS system. Please, could anyone provide me the steps to successfully install this software?. I've been trying to install this software using wine but I couldn't succeed it. Why do some games allow offline Steam achievements? I know of  where it is asked if you can get Steam achievements offline. The accepted answer to that was no.   But I do earn achievements for some Steam games while playing in offline mode!  For example, right now I am earning achievements for Cave Story+ as I play in offline mode. In other games I also earn achievements while playing in offline mode. Not just when I am disconnected but still in "online" mode as might be suggested in the linked question.  But what is really bugging me is that this does not happen with all games that have Steam achievements.  So, is allowing offline achievements something that Steam allows, the game devs allow, or is it something decided by a magical elf in the steam servers rolling some d20 dice around?  Edit:  As per request, I was able to attain visual evidence:    You should be able to see the achievement-get in action while in offline mode.  What is worth noting, (and something that I forgot to mention before) is that I only started earning achievements after I had went into online mode with the game installed. This is why I was able to earn this achievement with the ones after unlocked. I had started the game for the first time in offline mode, and did not notice that I was not earning achievements. When I had connected once, I did not have to start the game while online. I was able to earn achievements offline.  I also must state publicly: I do not play on easy. This was for testing purposes only people. It was for Science! When "etc." is at the end of a phrase, do you place a period after it? Example:     It's all about apples, oranges, bananas, etc.   VS.     It's all about apples, oranges, bananas, etc..   Update  What happens if the abbreviation is inside parentheses, do you place a dot after and before the closing parenthesis?     It's all about fruit (apples, bananas, etc.). How do I calculate the closest power of 2 or 10 a number is?