We have a reputable news domain which is about 17 years old. We want to redirect this domain from example-all.tld to exampleall.tld. We will implement a 301 permanent redirect for all URLs.  Now traffic is coming from search on Google for the brand name and business keywords.  For these keywords we are first in the search results for pretty much all search engines.  We have many organic backlinks for example-all.com domain, Moz Domain Authority 64 &amp; Page Authority 70.  When we redirect the domain, what types of SEO problems will befall the website? Will we get the same value of previous domain for backlinks, Google search, reputation, etc?  Is there any other method for this redirect from an SEO perspective?
As part of graduating from Area51 and becoming a full fledged site we sometimes change domain names from http://topic.stackexchange.com to http://example.com. Aside from the obvious 301 redirect rules to support existing urls transparently, are there other techniques that would aid in the preservation of SEO?
If I have $10$ apples, but you have $5$ apples, then I have $2$ times more apples than you. But what if I have $10$ apples, but you don't have any apples?   If you look at the graph $f(x)=\frac{10}{x}$, it shows that when $x$ approaches $0$, $f(x)$ approaches infinity. So it means I have infinity times more apples than you? Finn knows nothing about his family because he was taken while he was very little.   But a black main character makes me think (not being racist guys). And when he used the lightsaber I thought that he had a Jedi parent. Master Windu is the only black Jedi we know so is there any canon explanation to that? Is it right? Cartoon with a young unicorn and a demon In the late 80s or early 90s I remember watching an animated series that followed a young unicorn and a demon.   In one episode the unicorn gave the demon his horn, and the unicorn almost died.   In another episode there was a man who was able to turn people into human shaped building blocks and built a huge tower from them.   Those are the two scenes I remember with any clarity.   Does anyone have any idea? Converting the beta coefficient from matrix to scalar notation in OLS regression Dell Latitude E7270 Number of vertices in the Klein bottle triangulation given in "Topology and geometry for physicists" by Nash and Sen I stumbled upon the following triangulation of the Klein Bottle in page 76 of the book Topology and geometry for physicists by Charles Nash and Siddhartha Sen.    Below the figure, it says "the triangulation $K$ consists of eight $0$-simplexes[...]".  I think this is not an eight-vertex triangulation, but rather a nine-vertex triangulation of the Klein bottle. I also know, thanks to the great comments under  question, that an $8$-vertex triangulation of the Klein bottle is a minimal one, hence the one portrayed in the book isn't minimal.  Am I correct? Trying to overwrite ... which is different from other instances of package I tried to upgrade Intel graphics in ubuntu 16.10 using the official installer. The last stage of unpacking libcairo2 produces an error (see figure).  When I do upgrade I get the same error also:   Preparing to unpack .../0-libcairo2_1.15.2-0intel1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libcairo2:amd64 (1.15.2-0intel1) over (1.15.2-0intel1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-aYhdFd/0 libcairo2_1.15.2-0intel1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libcairo2/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libcairo2:amd64 Preparing to unpack .../1-libcairo2_1.15.2-0intel1_i386.deb ... Unpacking libcairo2:i386 (1.15.2-0intel1) over (1.15.2-0intel1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-aYhdFd/1-libcairo2_1.15.2-0intel1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libcairo2/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libcairo2:i386 Errors were encountered while processing: /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-aYhdFd/0-libcairo2_1.15.2-0intel1_amd64.deb /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-aYhdFd/1-libcairo2_1.15.2-0intel1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)   It seems that there is a conflict in thelibcairo releases; if yes, how to resolve it ? Adjective for someone who exaggerates emotions to get sympathy What's the word for someone who tries to get sympathy from others by exaggerating their emotions or constantly reminding them of something tragic that happened to them?  I'm looking for an adjective - no disorders or health related definitions please. Virtualbox: OS cannot use the new extended disk space (.vdi) I am running Virtualbox. I increased the size of my hard disk (.vdi) from 10G to 15G. Now when I start my Mint vm, the hard disk reports as 7.5g (df) even though i extended it (fdisk -l). I am not sure what is the problem. Can anyone point me the problem?  $ df -h Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1     &gt;&gt;7.5G&lt;&lt; 7.1G   61M 100% / udev            1.5G  4.0K  1.5G   1% /dev tmpfs           581M  888K  581M   1% /run none            5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock none            1.5G   88K  1.5G   1% /run/shm  $ sudo fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: &gt;&gt;16.1 GB&lt;&lt;, 16106127360 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1958 cylinders, total 31457280 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x000c55a4     Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System /dev/sda1   *        2048    15728639     7863296   83  Linux /dev/sda2        15730686    16775167      522241    5  Extended /dev/sda5        15730688    16775167      522240   82  Linux swap / Solaris  $ vboxmanage showhdinfo mint.vdi UUID:                 a94931b9-673c-440a-ab6b-2c3eedd0cf93 Accessible:           yes Logical size:         15360 MBytes Current size on disk: 7806 MBytes Type:                 normal (base) Storage format:       VDI Format variant:       dynamic default Location:             /opt/virtualization/vm/mint.vdi Floating Objects and Weight The Situation:  A ball is placed in a beaker filled with water and floats. It is also attached to the bottom of the beaker via a string.   The Question:  The ball is attached to the beaker, thus making the ball and beaker (and string included) a system. However, it is floating. Does the ball add to the weight of the beaker? For instance if me and my friend had a Pidgeot and we powered them all the way up. Could mine end up with like 525 and his at like 500? Prove that some topology is not metrizable Mclaurins with $e^{\sin(x)}$ To evaluate $e^{\sin(x)}$ I use the standard series $e^t$ and $\sin(t)$, combining them gives me:  $e^t = 1+t+\dfrac{t^2}{2!}+\dfrac{t^3}{3!}+\dfrac{t^4}{4!}+O(t^5)$  $\sin(t) = t-\dfrac{t^3}{3!}+O(t^5)$  $\therefore e^{\sin(x)} = 1+\sin(x)+\dfrac{\sin^2(x)}{2!}+\cdots+O(x^5)$  $\iff e^{\sin(x)}=1+\left(x-\dfrac{x^3}{6}\right)+\dfrac{\left(x-\frac{x^3}{6}\right)^2}{2}+\dfrac{x^3}{6}+O(x^5) = 1+x +\dfrac{x^2}{2}-\dfrac{x^4}{6} + O(x^5)$  In the last step, I only evaluate up to $\sin^3x$ term, everything above has a grade equal to or greater than $x^5$  However, I'm wrong. According to Wolfram, the series expansion for $e^{\sin x} = 1+x+\dfrac{x^2}{2}-\dfrac{x^4}{8}+O(x^5)$.  What did I do wrong? I can't seem to find what or where. I want to reinstall Ubuntu, but I also want all information and settings to disappear. So everything looks like the first time I installed it. Is it possible to do so via Terminal? Or what are the steps I should follow? SQL Server 2012 and 2016 Standard:  If I put if-else logic in a stored procedure to execute one of two branches of code, depending on the value of a parameter, does the engine cache the latest version?  And if on the following execution, the value of the parameter changes, will it re-compile and re-cache the stored procedure, since a different branch of the code must be executed? (This query is quite expensive to compile.) Compile gvim from sources? Meta Meta Privilege I just took a look at meta today and noticed something weird in the meta privileges. If you look at the meta privilege list, you can see that at . I know that there is no meta for meta, and the link they give you in the privilege page leads you to meta.stackexchange.com, right where you started. Why do they have this privilege? I have a feeling that this is a bad recursive joke. You must be  member of meta to get the privilege of being a member of meta! :) Why doesn't the auxiliary will qualify as future tense? According to A Student's Introduction to English Grammar, Tense is defined as follows:     Tense. A system marked by verb inflection or auxiliaries whose basic use to locate the situation in time: I liked it (past tense, past time), I like it(present tense, present time).   However, the author also points out:     ..., English is not one of them: it has no future tense. It does have several ways of talking about future time, and the most basic one does involve the auxiliary will.   These two quotes made me puzzled because, as noted above, Tense is denoted by inflection or auxiliaries and the auxiliary will seems to clearly meet the criteria. In conclusion, my question is   Why doesn't the auxiliary will qualify as future tense? wp_get_nav_menu_items order doesn't work List of apps ever downloaded