I am a 2nd-year PhD student. I have published two conference papers, and now I want to upload a copy to arXiv. I am aware it is common (flexible) for researchers in some areas (e.g. machine learning) to upload their papers on arXiv; However, it is uncommon in my research area/targeted publications, but I think it would be useful for wide-access (my research area: algorithm-hardware co-design for machine learning) I wonder how to know If a paper is allowed to be put on arXiv?  Do publishers have rules against that? Or It is the Journals/conferences have rules against that? Where can I find them (generally)? Are there any rules on the version of the paper that is allowed? e.g. pre-publication, camera-ready, post-publication etc.  Thanks.
An increasing number of funding organizations require publications on the research that they fund to be open access, i.e. available to the public without having to subscribe to a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know where I can find a list of journals/publishers that do not allow material that they publish to be published this way?
How can I compute the integral $\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dt}{1+t^4}$? I have to compute this integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dt}{1+t^4}$$ to solve a problem in a homework. I have tried in many ways, but I'm stuck. A search in the web reveals me that it can be do it by methods of complex analysis. But I have not taken this course yet. Thanks for any help. Let $a_n$ be a sequence of positive reals, such that the partial sums $S_n = \sum_{i = 1} ^ n a_i$ diverge to $\infty$. For given $\epsilon &gt; 0$ do we have $$\sum_{n = 1} ^ \infty \frac{a_n}{S_n^{1 + \epsilon}} &lt; \infty?$$  For $\epsilon \ge 1$ we can resolve this quickly by noting $$\frac{a_n}{S_n ^ 2} \le \frac 1 {S_{n - 1}} - \frac 1 {S_n}$$ so for sufficiently large $n$ we can bound $\frac{a_n}{S_n^{1 + \epsilon}}$ by $\frac 1 {S_{n - 1}} - \frac 1 {S_n}$ as well. I'm wondering if this is true for arbitrary $\epsilon &gt; 0$. I know that the series in question diverges for $ \epsilon = 0$, so all that is missing is what happens in $(0, 1)$. wpa_supplicant store password as hash (WPA-EAP with phase2="auth=PAP") Is there a way to store my password in /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf as some hash instead of plaintext?  By "password" I refer here to the password used for phase2 authentification. I do not refer to the Preshared Key (PSK) which could be hashed using wpa_passphrase.  For phase2 MSCHAPv2 or MSCHAP authentification I could store the password as MD4 hash using nt_password_hash (see example wpa_supplicant.conf line 659).  Is there any way to store my PAP password as hash?  Or: Is there a way to store the password in some sort of external storage? The example wpa_supplicant.conf suggests the use of such an external storage (using ext:????) but I could not find any documentation about it.  I am aware that storing the password as hash does not increase wifi security. But as the password MUST be the same as the password for other services (account management, subscriptions, payments ...) I don't want it to be stored as plaintext. I'm using the official Stack Exchange mobile app for iOS or Android, and  My app crashed! It doesn't look good on my new smartphone. It won't run after I updated my device. I noticed another bug. I have an idea for a new feature which is currently not in the app.  How do I report bugs with or request features for the iOS and Android apps? Also:  I've used the built-in functionality of the app to report a bug or submit a feature request. Did I do the right thing? The app prompted me to post on Meta after an error occurred. Should I post about it here? I'm wondering why the latest version is from 2017. I've heard rumors that the apps are no longer supported; is that true? I can't find the app on my device's app store anymore! Where did it go?     We get a lot of bug reports from users about the mobile apps, which are unsupported, and at the moment, there is no centralized Q&amp;A pair for those to be closed as duplicates of (the relevant answers are spread across multiple unrelated questions). This question is an FAQ proposal, to serve as a directly-related duplicate target for those questions. $a^2b^2+a^2c^2+b^2c^2\leq 3$ Let $a, b, c\geq 0$ s.t.$$(a^2-a+1)(b^2-b+1)(c^2-c+1)=1$$  Show that $ a^2b^2+a^2c^2+b^2c^2\leq 3$.  My idea:  I denote $a+b+c=x$, $ab+bc+ac=y$ and $abc=z$.  Then I have $$x^2+y^2+z^2-xy-xz-yz+2z-y-x=0$$ I have to show that $$y^2-2xz\leq 3$$ I tried to prove it with the sign of trinom, but it doesn't work. How do we know that $F = ma$, not $F = k \cdot ma$ It seems intuitive that $a\; \propto \frac{F}{m}$, as the greater the force that is applied on an object, the greater its acceleration will be. Inversely, the greater the mass of the object, the slower the acceleration will be.  However, when rewriting proportions as equations, you must introduce a constant of proportionality, and in this case of a direct proportion, if $a \propto \frac{F}{m}$ then when rewriting as an equation you will have $$a = k\cdot\frac{F}{m}$$  In order to get the standard formula $F = ma$ this constant must be $1$. However, how do we know that this is the case? How do we know that the constant isn't $2$ and the formula $F = \frac{1}{2}ma$, for instance? Some people say that mass increases with speed, some people say that the mass of an object is independent of its speed.  I understand how some (though not many) things in physics are a matter of interpretation based on one's definitions. But I can't get my head around how both can be 'true' is any sense of the word.  Either mass increases or it doesn't, right?  Can't we just measure it, and find out which 'interpretation' is right? e.g.: (in some sophisticated way) heat up some particles in a box and measure their weight?  ------------------------------  UPDATE  Right, so I've got two identical containers, each with identical amounts of water, each on identical weighing scales, and each in the same g field. If one container has hotter water, will the reading on its scale be larger than the other? If the answer is yes, and g is constant, does this mean that the m in w=mg has got bigger? How to prevent LaTeX from line-breaking a phrase? How can I prevent LaTeX from putting line-breaks into a phrase?  I could replace dashes with  and spaces with non-breaking spaces, but I'm looking for a more general solution in case I need other characters in such phrases. I am trying to find the splitting field of $x^6+x^3+1$ over $\mathbb{Q}$.  Finding the roots of the polynomial is easy (substituting $x^3=t$ , finding the two roots of the polynomial in $t$ and then taking a 3-rd root from each one). The roots can be seen  [if there is a more elegant way of finding the roots it will be nice to hear]  Is is true the that the splitting field is $\mathbb{Q}((-1)^\frac{1}{9})$ ? I think so from the way the roots look, but I am unsure.  Also, I am having trouble finding the minimal polynomial of $(-1)^\frac{1}{9}$, it seems that it would be a polynomial of degree 9, but of course the degree can't be more than 6...can someone please help with this ? Disable StringBuilder optimisation in javac Propose Newbie-Overflow site or section Because the perl section is looking like that right now. I believe that Stack Overflow is going out of it's charter in becoming a newbie FAQ when as far as the original reasoning it was meant to be something along the lines of an expert site.   is a good example of what I mean in Perl. It probably could be closed because it's a duplicate, or some other reason.   I would also like to indicate that I don't hold back answering newbie questions. It's just when I think of an obscure "stack overflow" error that's beating you some 3 am close to deadline, that's not "Howcum Perl print ..." and follows with something that causes a vast majority of Perl programmers to say oops, because they know exactly what's going on.   So the proposal is   A new site. "Move to Newbieville" A new "section" A new status somewhat similar to Closed ("Newbied") but still can be updated all the same as an open question.   I'm not against giving some newbies an assist, but I feel a FAQ for rank newbieism is not something that SO started out to be, based on the original concept of a Expert Site.   Including comment to Gnoupi:   I said nothing about making newbies unwelcome. Like I said. I answer them--heck, I think I've even answer homework questions. I've answered on the vague impressions that I can glean from posts that have 4 close votes. It can even lead to avoiding downvoting or yelling at newbies by more established curmudgeons if there is a special action you can do to gently inform newbies that this is a real newbie question.  However, you have to know that to some people newbies are already unwelcome. There is a site ethic, but the individual is also going to decide how much they welcome newbies. And people do post RTFM answers already.   Anyway, I'm one vote away from a peer pressure badge it seems. (Nope, nailed it.)    EDIT  For somebody jumping to the conclusion that I'm hostile to newbies:  just earlier How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript? As I understand it, electromagnetic waves have two components which are the result of each other, i.e., when a moving electric charge creates a changing magnetic field at point X then a changing electric field is created at point Y and this repeating process is what creates EM waves, so therefore, it requires no medium. Is my understanding correct?  One thing that I'm surprised to know is that light is also called an electromagnetic wave.  Does this include light of any kind, for example: light from a bulb, a tube, and also from the Sun? How do they contain electric and magnetic fields? Dual Canadian and British citizen - healthcare coverage in the UK? I want to know if I am entitled to medical assistance in the UK while visiting for 3 weeks in June. I am travelling on my Canadian passport since my UK one is outdated. What's the Best Way to Shuffle an NSMutableArray? If you have an NSMutableArray, how do you shuffle the elements randomly?  (I have my own answer for this, which is posted below, but I'm new to Cocoa and I'm interested to know if there is a better way.)    Update: As noted by @Mukesh, as of iOS 10+ and macOS 10.12+, there is an -[NSMutableArray shuffledArray] method that can be used to shuffle. See  for details. (But note that this creates a new array, rather than shuffling the elements in place.) How do I get started in Astrophotography? How do I attach events to dynamic HTML elements with jQuery? What is the physical explanation for energy transport in simple electrical circuits? Keeping it simple, what is the physics approach to a current in a wire connected to a battery? How does the electric field behave?  I've read somewhere that, contrary to the common conception, electrons don't really flow as water in a hose so, what is really going on there? How is energy transported at the speed of light if electrons don't flow like very fast water? What does a resistor do? OK, very basic question here.  I read lots of books, searched quite a bit, and every description I read seemed to talk about the flow of electrons and right away go too deep in theory for me to grasp the basic principle of their use.  I understand a resistor limits the "flow", so that an LED doesn't blow up for example. But I fail to understand exactly what a resistor does to current and voltage...  Do resistors affect both current and voltage? In what manner? Is there a W3C valid way to disable autocomplete in a HTML form? When using the xhtml1-transitional.dtd doctype, collecting a credit card number with the following HTML  &lt;input type="text" id="cardNumber" name="cardNumber" autocomplete='off'/&gt;   will flag a warning on the W3C validator:     there is no attribute "autocomplete".   Is there a W3C / standards way to disable browser auto-complete on sensitive fields in a form?