I have tried this problem by taking other variables for sum and products of the variables, but I am not able to simplify it. Neither did it help to convert this into a cubic polynomial with roots $x, y, z.$ It is given that $x, y, z \in \Bbb R$. If we are given $x+y+z \geq xyz$, then prove that $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \geq xyz$
$x,y,z \in \mathbb R$ My attempt: Notice that if $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \geq xyz$ and $x+y+z \geq xyz$. So : $$x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \geq x+y+z $$ But this is actually not always true, take the case when $ 0&lt;x,y,z &lt;1$ And you will see that this is not working. Maybe I’m wrong.
Prove $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{(n-1)}{n}$ using induction. I need to prove $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{(n-1)}{n}$ using induction. I am getting stuck midway through the inductive step.   Here is what I have:  $\forall n\geq 2$, where $n\in\mathbb{N}, P(n)$ is the statement "$\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{(n-1)}{n}$".  Base case:  $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{2}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{1}{2}$ = $\frac{(2-1)}{2}$ so $P(2)$ is true.  Inductive assumption: Assume $P(n)$ is true. Need to show $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n+1}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ = $\frac{((n+1)-1)}{(n+1)}$.  $\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n}\frac{1}{(i-1)i}$ + $\frac{1}{n^{2}}$ = $\frac{(n-1)}{n}$ + $\frac{1}{n^{2}}$  = $\frac{n(n-1) + 1}{n^{2}}$ = $\frac{n^{2}-n+1}{n^{2}}$  I got stuck here and tried working backward from $\frac{((n+1)-1)}{(n+1)}$, which gives me:  $\frac{((n+1)-1)}{(n+1)}$ = $\frac{n}{(n+1)}$   Any suggestions on what to do next or where I may be going wrong? PHP considers null is equal to zero How can infinite information be theoretically encoded or stored in a single qubit? I've just gotten started with Nielsen and Chuang's text, and I'm a little stuck. They mention that theoretically, it would be possible to store an infinite amount of information in the state of a single qubit. I'm not sure I completely comprehend this.    Here's how I rationalized it: You take all the information you want to store, put it in binary form, and make it the real component of $\alpha $ or $\beta$ (the coefficients of the computational basis states).   Now I'm not sure if I've understood it right, but since it's still fuzzy in my head it would be great to get some kind of ELI5 explanation or possibly a more detailed picture of how this would, even theoretically, be possible.    Apologies if the question doesn't meet standards. I'm new to the forum and would be open to feedback regarding asking questions or answering them. For example:     Is (A &or; B &or; C) &and; (D &or; E &or; F) the same as   (A &and; D) &or; (A &and; E) &or; (A &and; F) &or; (B &and; D) &or; (B &and; E) &or; ( B &and; F) &or; (C &and; D) &or; (C &and; E) &or; (C &and; F)?   How would I check equivalence in general? Removing duplicate strings from an array? Lack of Articles in Headlines Are there any rules as to an article before a noun in the singular in headlines please, i.e. lack of an article?       Description of Type of Investment What is the difference between a[bc]d and a{b,c}d? Why do people use a{b,c}d when there is already a[bc]d? Polynomials, prove exercise question about question There is a polynomial P with integer coefficients and with pairwise different integers $a,b,c$ . Prove that it is not possible for $P(a) = b$, $P(b)=c$, $P(c) = a$  First off I don't understand "pairwise different" part - what does it mean ,can you show me this as an equation? After that I'd like to get a hint in case I don't make it. + I'd prefer to have hints/answers written more algebraically without $\sum$ etc. (It helps me get better understanding what's going on under the hood) This is an unproven proposition I've come across in multiple places.   Suppose $A$ is a commutative Noetherian ring, and $S$ a multiplicative subset of $A$. Then $S^{-1}A$ is Noetherian.  Why is this? I thought about taking some chain of submodules $$ S^{-1}M_1\subset S^{-1}M_2\subset\cdots $$ and pulling back to a chain  $$ M_1\subset M_2\subset\cdots $$ of submodules of $A$ which must eventually stablize. Is there more to it than this? I kind of wary of assuming all submodules of $S^{-1}A$ have form $S^{-1}M$ for $M\leq A$. Constructing the reciprocal of a segment How can one construct the reciprocal length of a line segment? For example, given any line segment a, how can $\frac{1}{a}$ be constructed?  I was told that it can be solved by creating similar triangles, but I do not get it. I would like footnote numbering to continue over pages and chapters. In my document it's reset every chapter. I'm using the report documentclass. Wouldn't it be a good idea to be able to vote for questions to be moved to any Stack Exchange site? For example, I just voted  as off topic, but that was all I could do. I wish I could've voted it be moved to .  It's OK to have the predefined list of sites that is now when voting to move, but it would be nice to have a more link, where we could pick any Stack Exchange site.  Here's a quick mockup of how I see this implemented:    When the more link is clicked, a list of all the Stack Exchange sites should appear. Consider the sequence defined as  $x_1 = 1$  $x_{n+1} = \sin x_n$  I think I was able to show that the sequence $\sqrt{n} x_{n}$ converges to $\sqrt{3}$ by a tedious elementary method which I wasn't too happy about.  (I think I did this by showing that $\sqrt{\frac{3}{n+1}} &lt; x_{n} &lt; \sqrt{\frac{3}{n}}$, don't remember exactly)  This looks like it should be a standard problem.   Does anyone know a simple (and preferably elementary) proof for the fact that the sequence $\sqrt{n}x_{n}$ converges to $\sqrt{3}$? Can we create a subsection of the References Cited section with different reference numbering? How can I host my own Minecraft server? What is CTAN.org now? Sensor for detecting airsoft bullet I'm trying to make airsoft chronograph/chronometer (a device that measures airsoft bullet speed). The idea is to measure time in which bullet is traveling from point A to point B, and then I can calculate bullet speed. Bullet is shot into plastic pipe with diameter of 32mm. I've tried to put on one side IR LED and on the other side phototransistor (BPW 40), both at the start and end of the tube. Something like this:  Blue circles are phototransistors, red circles are IR LEDs and white circles are airsoft bullets. When bullet passes through area where bullet 2  is drawn (just in between IR LED and phototransistor), everyting works perfectly. But when the bullet passes where bullets 1 and 3 are drawn, it isn't detected. That is expected, but unwanted behavior. So my question is: how can I detect bullets regardlessly of it's position ? I've thought about putting IR LEDs and phototransistors around the pipe (not only in one place), like this:  but this solution isn't cheapest: 5 IR LEDs + 5 BPW 40 = cca $12 times 2 (because I need it on both sides of the pipe) = $24. Is there any cheaper solution ? Is BPW 40 good choice for phototransistor ? I don't know which IR LEDs I'm using (and salesman in the store also doesn't know - he told me these are generic ones for remote controllers, like TV or DVD controller). Diameter of the pipe is 32mm and it will be long about 14cm (sensors will be 10cm apart). Diameter of airsoft bullet is 6mm. EDIT: I'll go for my second idea. I just have one more question: is it better to arrange IR emitters and photo transistors this way:  or this way:  Thanks !! How to type special/accented letters in LaTeX? How to type these special letters from European languages in latex? ä, é, and L'? Code breaks when updating jQuery due to changes in toggle Why is saltatory conduction in myelinated axons faster than continuous conduction in unmyelinated axons? How does spacing apart sodium and potassium channels allow the action potential to travel faster down the axon? This is the reason always cited for saltatory conduction and myelination, but my mental model of conduction tells me that the density of ion gates along the axon should not affect the speed of the AP.   To illustrate, consider a myelinated axon. A wave of Na$^+$ from action potential site 1, a node of Ranvier, rushes into and quickly diffuses down the axon. (It travels in both directions, but backwards is still in the refractory period.) It diffuses through the myelinated region, its concentration always diminishing. Before it attenuates too much, however, it happens upon node of Ranvier 2, where it triggers another action potential. A new wave of Na$^+$ rushes in and the cycle repeats. This should be plain so far.  Now imagine that there is actually a node of Ranvier halfway between node 1 and 2, called node 1.5. The wave of Na$^+$, on its way to node 2, happens to trigger an action potential at node 1.5, from which a wave of Na$^+$ pours in and either boosts the original wave or replaces it by taking its momentum. Now the reinforced wave proceeds to node 2 and triggers it just as soon as, perhaps even sooner than, if node 1.5 had not existed. Repeatedly insert nodes at higher densities until the situation is simply lack of myelination, and we conclude that unmyelinated axons can transmit an action-potential-triggering wave of Na+ as fast as or faster than a myelinated one.  In short, my point of confusion is this: I cannot see how a higher density of gated channels can possibly slow down the wavefront of Na+ that triggers action potentials. If anything, the additional influxes of Na+ should speed up the all-important wavefront, assuming that new waves really "either boost the original wave or replace it by taking its momentum", and also assuming that the wavefront of Na$^+$ is really all-important for signal transmission, and also assuming that the mere presence of (voltage?) gated ion channels in the membrane does not significantly retard the wavefront.  But the usual explanation for why saltatory conduction is faster than continuous conduction (a fact I hope is empirically and unambiguously established) relies on the putative slowing effect of ion channels on the signal fore. Please explain this effect in more detail, if it is not a misconception.