Im trying to install Visual Studio 2015 on Windows Server 2012 R2. And even after run windows update and install everything cant install it.    Now I try to go the windows update   And even when show windows 2012, the link go to window 8 files     And if I try to install that file say the "update isn't applicable to this device"    And show the following error in the Event Log     La actualización de Windows  no se pudo instalar debido a un error: 2149842967 "". (Línea de comandos: ""C:\Windows\system32\wusa.exe" "C:\Users\juan.oropeza\Downloads\Windows8.1-KB2919355-x64.msu" ")   So what I do to install the update?
So I'm trying to install Visual Studio 2015 Community on my Windows Server 2012 R2 box which will end up being a Jenkins build server. Attempting to do so gives an error saying that I need to install KB 2919355.    So I attempt to download the right KB from the . The two files that I would assume to work are either Windows8.1-KB2919355-x64.msu and Windows8.1-KB2919355-x86.msu (just to try) and neither update work, saying that the update is not applicable.    I've not been able to get this working and I haven't been able to find a proper way to fix this. Can anyone offer any suggestions or solutions? Thanks!
I will like to know some of the android emulators that work really well with Ubuntu 11.10 and above. I want to try 'whatsapp' on Ubuntu through an android emulator. Thanks in advance $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{z^n}{n}$ does not converge uniformly on $\mathbb{D}$. It is required to prove that the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{z^n}{n}$ does not converge uniformly on the open unit disc centered at $0$, i.e. $\mathbb{D}$. Clearly by virtue of the ratio test the series converges pointwise on  $\mathbb{D}$. However I find it difficult to see why the convergence is not uniform. Could someone please give me a hint? With the Taylor series representation of $\sin$ or $\cos$ as a starting point (and assuming no other knowledge about those functions), how can one:  a. prove they are periodic?  b. find the value of the period? Glossaries: Make a glossary entry recognizable in printing How do you make it visible to the reader that the printed word/term is an entry in the glossary? In my PDF on the computer, I just see it because I use the hyperref package and there's a red box around it. But when printing it, there's just nothing that makes it visible to the user.  Is there a typographically good and common way of doing this? Names of higher-order derivatives Specific derivatives have specific names. First order is often called tangency/velocity, second order is curvature/acceleration. I've also come across words like Jerk, Yank, Jounce, Jolt, Surge and Lurch for 3rd and 4th order derivatives. Is there a widely agreed list of names for these? How many orders have specific names?  In this case, I'm dealing with NURBs curves, so the "tangency" and "curvature" related words are to be preferred over "velocity" and "acceleration" words. Simple homework question about normally distributed variables The question states:      Consider a set of random variables $X_i$, where $i=1,...n$. Each $X_i$ is   normally distributed with mean $0$ and variance $1$, i.e. $X_i$ are $\mathcal N(0,1)$.   What is the mean and the variance of the random variable $Y$, where   $Y=X_1+...+X_n$.   How do I do this? I have a SQL Server 2005 database using the full recovery model. If I execute the following commands:  ALTER DATABASE test SET RECOVERY SIMPLE; ALTER DATABASE test SET RECOVERY FULL;   or   BACKUP LOG test WITH  truncate_only;   Then try to run a log backup:  BACKUP LOG test TO  DISK = 'backupfile.bak'   I receive the error message:     BACKUP LOG cannot be performed because there is no current database backup.   Question:     How do I check that I will not be able to take a log backup, without running a backup log command? I have a follow up question to this question:   My question is: when should you add a comma when starting a letter/email with     Hello John,      It was fun to see ...   I am pretty sure that a comma goes after the name, but lately I have seen several people (academics) write      Hello, John,       It was fun to see ...   with a comma after the Hello.  I am wondering when a comma there is appropriate.    I see this question  but I am wondering about the situation where you have a comma after the name also. Show that $\lim\limits_{y\downarrow 0} y\mathbb{E}[\frac{1}{X};X>y]=0$. Let $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})$ be a probability space, and let $X$ be a nonnegative random defined on this space. For any $A\in \mathcal{F}$, let $\mathbb{E}[X;A]:=\mathbb{E}[X\mathbb{1}_{A}]$, where $\mathbb{1}_{A}$ denotes the indicator random variable on $A$. Without assuming $\mathbb{E}\left[\frac{1}{X}\right]&lt;\infty$, show that  \begin{eqnarray} \lim\limits_{y\downarrow 0} ~~y~\mathbb{E}\left[\frac{1}{X};X&gt;y\right]=0. \end{eqnarray} Any initial ideas will be greatly appreciated. Counting binary operations on a set with $n$ elements I am trying to solve following problem but not able to find any way to proceed.  Let $S$ be a set having $n$ elements. Can we count about number of binary operations that can be defined on a set? Can we also count number of commutative binary operations defined on  $S$?  Thanks for the help and suggestions All Faces to Individual Objects I am looking for a way to take all the faces of an object and make each face it's own object.   In the image above, you'll see a basic representation of what I'm trying to accomplish. On the left is a shape with faces, all attached. On the right is the result I want, an object for each face. The project I'm working on is much more complicated than this example, so I can't select each face and separate by selection. I have over 3,000 faces to work on. As the title asks, why didn't the basilisk bite received in the Chamber of Secrets destroy the Horcrux inside the bitten person?   Yes, I know Fawkes quite quickly healed the bite wound with his phoenix tears, but when Harry used the basilisk fang to destroy Tom Riddle's diary the destruction of that Horcrux was immediate. When Ron hit the locket with the Sword of Gryffindor, it was destroyed immediately. Although the destruction of the ring occurred off-page, Dumbledore used the Sword of Gryffindor to destroy it, so presumably, like the locket, it was gone right away. Nagini died straightaway when Neville decapitated her. The destruction of the Hufflepuff cup happens off-page. The diadem seems to have been destroyed by Fiendfyre immediately as well, as when Harry examined it outside the Room of Requirement it was already leaking a blood-like substance, and then it cracked in half. When Voldemort hit Harry with Avada Kedavra in the forest, Harry woke up in limbo with the last fragment of Voldemort's soul - that awful flayed baby-like being - separated from him immediately.   Is there a logical/canon-based explanation for why the fragment of Voldemort's soul residing in Harry wasn't destroyed upon Harry being bitten by the basilisk?  NOTE: I've read the HP Wiki's entry on Horcruxes; however, I find the HP Wiki to be inconsistent in its accuracy, so I'm hesitant to accept the Wiki's explanation on the matter. I'd prefer an explanation constructed from information in the books or a statement by JKR, or the like. What should I do, as my submitted paper is still under review after 1 year? Let's say you have a few expressions like the following:  $$\begin{array}((x+17)^2 \\ x^2 + 34x + 289 \end{array} \\ 288 + \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^2}{2} + 34x + 1 \\ [...] $$  You get the idea: there's an infinite number of ways of representing the same expression. The challenge is that my application is validating answers to math problems, input by math students practicing a certain concept. I'd like to make sure that whenever they submit an answer, the checker is completely insensitive to the issues of ordering, simplification, formatting etc. which would be plain frustrating. I'd also ideally like to support more than one variable such as x, y, z in the same expression.  What's a reliable way to check that two expressions are the same? The most brute force way I can think of would be to just plug a number into each variable of each expression and see what the result is.  I have a hunch however that there might be ways of getting false positives this way. That, and I might be either missing something really obvious about this, or there might be a better way of doing the comparison.  Would love to hear what you think. I am using  to show the branch name in gnome terminal (Ubuntu 15.10) when working in a git repository. Based on the above I now have the below in my ~/.bashrc file:  # uncomment for a colored prompt, if the terminal has the capability; turned # off by default to not distract the user: the focus in a terminal window # should be on the output of commands, not on the prompt #force_color_prompt=yes    ...  # Add git branch if its present to PS1 parse_git_branch() {  git branch 2&gt; /dev/null | sed -e '/^[^*]/d' -e 's/* \(.*\)/(\1)/' } if [ "$color_prompt" = yes ]; then  PS1='${debian_chroot:+($debian_chroot)}\[\033[01;32m\]\u@\h\[\033[00m\]:\[\033[01;34m\]\w\[\033[01;31m\]$(parse_git_branch)\[\033[00m\]\$ ' else  PS1='${debian_chroot:+($debian_chroot)}\u@\h:\w$(parse_git_branch)\$ ' fi unset color_prompt force_color_prompt   As a result I now get:    so it works. But why has the coloring of my user@host been removed? And I would also expect that the branch name should be colored. Before it looked like this:    UPDATE: I have now tried this guide instead:    adding this to .bashrc:  parse_git_branch() {      git branch 2&gt; /dev/null | sed -e '/^[^*]/d' -e 's/* \(.*\)/ (\1)/' } export PS1="\u@\h \[\033[32m\]\w\[\033[33m\]\$(parse_git_branch)\[\033[00m\] $ "   and that works:    Notice in .bashrc I also have this (default):  # uncomment for a colored prompt, if the terminal has the capability; turned # off by default to not distract the user: the focus in a terminal window # should be on the output of commands, not on the prompt #force_color_prompt=yes   I have yet to find the reason why that snippet gives the correct result and the other version does not. Any input on this?  Here is the version of my .bashrc that has the old snippet enabled that does not work: Proving the inequality $\frac{n^k}{k^k}\leq\binom{n}{k}\leq\frac{n^k}{k!}$ involving binomial coefficient. What is the best way of proving inequalities including binomial coefficients in general? Lets look at this example:     $$\frac{n^k}{k^k}\leq\binom{n}{k}\leq\frac{n^k}{k!}$$   What I started with is:  $$\binom{n}{k}\frac{1}{n^k}\leq\frac{1}{k!}$$ $$\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}\frac{1}{n^k}\leq\frac{1}{k!}$$ $$\frac{(n-1)!}{(n-k)!n^{k-1}}\leq1$$ This is where I got stuck. How can I prove that is is lower than or equal to 1? Could you give me a hint? I was recently told (  ):     You cannot delete a class in production directly. You will need delete   the class from your sandbox and then deploy the deletions to your   production org.   When you deploy from sandbox to production, the   missing classes will come up in red and you can choose to deploy these   deletions to Production.   However, I'd like some clarification because finding information on how to do this is like pulling teeth, unfortunately.  Am I supposed to:   Delete the Trigger in Sandbox Make a deployment package in Sandbox Add the Trigger which is going to be listed in RED now Deploy (and that deletes it from Production)?   I am not seeing deleted Triggers in Red in Sandbox.  Are they NOT listed under "Triggers" for deployment, but elsewhere?   Frustrated = true.   Does this ONLY apply to Classes??  UPDATE:  I just tried again, with a CLASS, and it still doesn't show up at all as a Deployable package (red or not) after I delete it in the Sandbox.  UPDATE 2:  I was just able to delete a class, that I know was written via IDE from a third party, in both Sandbox and Production.  So now I'm wondering if it has to do with where it was originally deployed from (if from IDE, IDE can delete it - it from Sandbox, you have to jump through hoops).  :-( Can I access private members from outside the class without using friends? Create a table with LaTeX I need to copy a table from a pdf file to my LaTeX document. I know I have to do it by hand but still don't understand how to create a table with LaTeX. How can I check the actual size used in an NTFS directory with many hardlinks? On a Win7 NTFS volume, I'm using cwrsync which supports --link-dest correctly to create "snapshot" type backups. So I have:  z:\backups\2010-11-28\cygdrive\c\Users\... z:\backups\2010-12-02\cygdrive\c\Users\...   The content of 2010-12-02 is mostly hardlinks back to files in the 2010-11-28 directory, but there are a few new or changed files only in 2010-12-02. On linux, the 'du' utility will tell me the actual size taken by each incremental snapshot. On Windows, explorer and du under cygwin are both fooled by hardlinks and shows 2010-12-02 taking up a little more space than 2010-11-28.   Is there a Windows utility that will show the correct space acutally used?