Our 8 year old son saw my wife and I having sex the other day. Now I don't see anything wrong with it, yet my wife is unsure. What should happen here?
I ask this Question on behalf of my neighbor.   Their 12 year old son saw his parents having sex.  As there is only one room in their home we can't say its the parents' mistake... but now the question is how do they handle the situation?
I'm trying to make a page where a user provides an ID of a attachment and the site will set the headers and deliver that file instead of a 404 page. so /download/1754 would lookup the attachment with that Id and output it for viewing/download depending on the file type.  I just can't think of a wordpress friendly way to do this from inside a plugin. I considered using add_rewrite_rule but couldn't see a good way around it, also considered checking $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] to deliver the content before any HTML but then I'd have to stop the page from rendering a 404 and I was not sure of a Wordpress friendly way to do this.  My current idea was to have my plugin make a download page, assign a template and have that template run the logic instead of my plugin class. while I have used this before for another situation it was very messy as I had to write a lot of code to force users to be unable to update or edit the file and recreate/delete it on activation.deactivation. so ideally I'd like to avoid that. Probability that 2 appears at an earlier position than any other even number in a permutation of 1-20 Suppose we uniformly and randomly select a permutation from the 20! Permutations of 1,2,3,...,20. What is the probability that 2 appears at an earlier position than any other even number in the selected permutation?  My approach :   2 in first position ==> 1*19! (1 is the position of 2)  2 in second position ==> 10 *1 *18!  2 in third position ==> 10*9 *1 *17!  . . .  2 in 11th position ==> 10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1*1*9!  But this was asked as a multiple choice question in GATE 2007 and the options were  (A) 1/2   (B) 1/10  (C) 9!/20!  (D) None of these  I am not able to reduce this analysis to a given option. What is the relation between the Higgs field and chirality? Wikipedia  that the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry "is responsible for the bulk of the mass (over 99%) of the nucleons".  How do the nucleons gain mass from the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry? Why don't leptons gains mass from it? What is the role of the Higgs field in this all? How to deserialize a JSON String to Apex How can I deserialize this json object:      {     "response": {         "count": 1,         "benchmark": 0.22567009925842,         "requests": [             {                 "request": {                     "id": 537481,                     "image_thumbnail": "",                     "title": "Request for new bin(s) - residential",                     "description": "Propmain ref  3234-1114",                     "status": "submitted",                     "address": "36 Pine Tree Close",                     "location": "Peterborough, England",                     "zipcode": "PE1 1EJ",                     "user": "",                     "date_created": 1417173208,                     "count_comments": 0,                     "count_followers": 0,                     "count_supporters": 0,                     "lat": 52.599967,                     "lon": -0.233482,                     "user_follows": 0,                     "user_comments": 0,                     "user_request": 1,                     "rank": "0"                 }             }         ],         "status": {             "type": "success",             "message": "Success",             "code": 200,             "code_message": "Ok"         }     } }   What i've tried:   Map&lt;String,Object&gt; rawObj = (Map&lt;String,Object&gt;) JSON.deserializeUntyped(jsonString);     Map&lt;String,Object&gt; responseObj = (Map&lt;String,Object&gt;)rawObj.get('response');     List&lt;Object&gt; reqs = (List&lt;Object&gt;) responseObj.get('requests');     System.debug('Map Size = ' + reqs.size());     Map&lt;String, Object&gt; i = new Map&lt;String, Object&gt; ();     for (Object x : reqs) {          i = (Map&lt;String, Object&gt;)x; }     Map&lt;String,Object&gt; requests = (Map&lt;String,Object&gt;)i.get('request');     System.debug('Map Size = ' + i.size());     for (String field : i.keySet()){          Object id = i.get(field);         Object title = i.get('title');         System.debug('Id : ' + id);         System.debug('title : ' + title);          //System.debug('Title : ' + title);       } First time this happens to me.  When I try to edit , the title part is immediately erased:   And when I click cancel, the title becomes invisible:     Actually, the revision history is incomplete:   It shows that the question was asked after the comments:   That's highly likely a result of an edition of the history by a moderator.    Google Chrome 62.0.3202.94 (Official Build) (64-bit) on macOS 10.13.2 (17C88). New questions, Show Recommended, Sort Newest not working Gnome-shell seems to like to leave one monitor as "fixed" when you switch workspaces.  Additionally, there is no preview in the Activities view of my secondary monitor.  Also, on the second monitor, where there should be either empty desktop space, or a copy of the panel, I just have a white bar.  How can I get gnome-shell to treat my secondary monitor like the primary one? Drawing on an image with TikZ Recently I have learned how to draw simple stuff with TikZ. I really like it. Now I wonder if it is possible to draw with TikZ on a image. Instead of pasting a image in Illustrator and adding some vectors to point something in the picture I would like to do it using TikZ. Is it possible?   For example, on a picture of a computer (PNG,etc) I would like to draw some arrows and labels saying "Keyboard", "Monitor", etc. Prove $x^3 + 3 =4y(y+1)$ has no integer solutions The  says that public class SomeObject {   public void SomeOperation()   {     lock(this)     {       //Access instance variables     }   } }  is &quot;a problem if the instance can be accessed publicly&quot;. I'm wondering why? Is it because the lock will be held longer than necessary? Or is there some more insidious reason? What does the , operator do in C? Can a union be initialized in the declaration? Is stage.*.example.com valid for a wildcard DNS CNAME? A post here on DBA.StackExchange () has spawned an interesting question (at least, interesting to me) regarding performance in MySQL.  The context is that we want to insert a record in a table for each row that is updated.  Before the row is updated, we want to store off a previous value and then increment one of the columns (a "version" column).  If we do this inside a trigger, it works out nicely.  For MySQL, the triggers are , so it would be an easy solution.  Select the data currently in the table, insert it into the logging table, and the update the "version" column in the new data.  However, it's possible to move this logic to a stored procedure. If you do that, you're performing the insert, then incrementing the "version" column in the table.  The entire thing would be set based.   So, when it comes to performing this insert, would this be more performant to use the set-based stored procedure approach or a trigger based approach?  This question is for MySQL (since it has row-by-row triggers), although it could apply to other row-by-row trigger DBMSs. Diamond moderators  . In the second section from the top—entitled &quot;Ask questions, get answers, no distractions&quot;—that takes us to an opportunity to select one of a page full of questions from the site as the example question used on the about page. The selections currently available on physics are a little idiosyncratic. Is there some rhyme or reason to these? I suppose that we want a good example question to:  Be accessible to the intended audience (perhaps even to the newest and most naive person in that audience) Be judged at least decent by the community (positive score) Have more than one answer which are also judged acceptable (again positive score)  What else? How does a question end up on the list? The Software Center has a section of For Purchase programs &mdash;see screenshot below&mdash;, which is annonying me every time I want to install something.  Is there any way to remove or hide these programs from the Software Center?     Links to answers:                     Please leave a comment or send a mail to jmendeth@gmail.com   if it's not working for you or you're having trouble! Ping faster than light I just discovered very strange thing while testing my internet connection. My ping is smaller than it should be. For example ping time to Arizona State University is about 14ms.  eryk@eryk-pc:~$ ping www.asu.edu PING www.asu.edu.cdn.cloudflare.net (104.16.51.14) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 104.16.51.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=13.8 ms   I'm living in Poznań in Poland so my distance to Arizona State University in a straight line (very optimistic assumption) is about 10000 km. Considering the fact that ping time is a time for two directions (to the target and back to home). So my ping packet have to cross 20000 km distance. Speed of light is 300 000 km per second that is 300km per millisecond. So the smallest possible time to ping Arizona State University with my packet travelling at a speed of light is  20000/300=67ms   I have noticed similar results for servers located in Australia and some other States of America. Is my internet connection five times faster than light? Can hypercomputation compute the impossible? There are things which are illogical/logically impossible (like saying that 2+2=4 and 2+2=5. Without changing anything in the axioms of mathematics or logic, this would be a contradiction and would be inconsistent and illogical/logically impossible.   There are other types of logic systems apart from classical logic, like paraconsistent logics or even trivialism, that allow these contradictions to occur, prove them as right and work with them.   We can make a paraconsistent or trivialist system and work with it. For example, with trivialism, in theory, we would be able to derive and state everything we would want (since literally everything, even including illogical/logically impossible inconsistencies and contradictions), but we as humans (or as brains), are limited and can't conceive everything we want (at least to what I know). Therefore, no matter how many trivialist models we create and how much time we would work with them, we would never find or conceive many illogical/logically things because they are just that: impossible. There are impossible things to describe and conceive. For example, Russel's set is the set of all sets that do not contain themselves. If Russel's set contains itself, then it cannot contain itself, since it only contains sets that don't contain themselves. But if Russel's set does not contain itself, then it must contain itself, since it contains all sets that don't contain themselves.  There are quite a few logic bombs like this. You cannot ever compute the contents of Russel's set, and there are more formal, mathematical ways to present it. All of them have in common that you can't actually compute what the set is, whether you do it by hand, in your head, or on a computer. It's just a statement that cannot be fully logically processed.  If you take every possible state the human brain can be in, none of them include the computation of Russel's Set's contents. That is, not only can the contents not be computed, they cannot even be represented. No stimulus can cause us to comprehend Russel's Set, since such comprehension is not possible to begin with. It does not have a solution. Even if we try to solve it using trivialism, we would just be able to write a solution that does not make sense and prove it has sense and it is the real solution, but we could not be able to have a solution that would make sense "outside" the realm of trivialism (for example in classical logic), even though, using trivialism, we could prove that such solution would have sense in whatever context and logic system.   But what about hypercomputational machines (for example oracle-like machines)? I've read about some models of hypercomputation which are compatible with paraconsistent or trivialism logics. I've also read there are some models of hypercomputation (particularly those oracle-like models which use a black box) where, essentially, the hypercomputer is an algorithm that cannot exist. It might be because such an algorithm is fundamentally forbidden by logic itself (which is hided in a black box). Would any of these be capable of computing/"conceiving" these impossible things I wrote before? Do you know of anything that would help? What is the difference between display: inline and display: inline-block? What characters are allowed for the display name? I tried editing my display name and for some names it gives me this error:     Display Name can only contain a-z, 0-9, spaces, apostrophes or hyphens and must start with a letter or number   That is clearly not the case, because it will take the following names:   NullUserException -龍- NullUserException Ω    NullUserException ఠ_ఠ NullUserException ಠ_ಠ NullUserException இ_இ   But it won't let me do:   NullUserException  (╯°o°)╯ NullUserException ٩๏̯͡๏)۶ NullUserException ☜(ﾟヮﾟ☜) NullUserException อ้_อ้   So what's the regex used (assuming that's what's being used), so I can try out allowed names without actually changing it?