I am writing my thesis and using latex for first time. I would like to modify the the first page of my thesis, as it shows only name of thesis, my name etc. I would like to move all text little-bit to right-side, just on the first page, without effecting the other pages of thesis. Any idea how can I do it? I use ''right'' alignment instead of center, but it did not work.  \documentclass[a4paper,      12pt,      twoside,      openright,      cleardoublepage=empty,      numbers=noenddot,      appendixprefix,      BCOR1.5cm,      bibliography=totoc       ]{scrbook}     \thispagestyle{empty} \begin{titlepage} \begin{center}   %xyz   \end{center} \end{titlepage} \clearpage
I am writing my thesis and using latex for first time. I would like to modify the the first page of my thesis, as it shows only name of thesis, my name etc. I would like to move all  text little-bit to right-side, just on the first page, without effecting the other pages of thesis. Any idea how can I do it?  \documentclass[a4paper,      12pt,      twoside,      openright,      cleardoublepage=empty,      numbers=noenddot,      appendixprefix,      BCOR1.5cm,      bibliography=totoc      ]{scrbook}   \thispagestyle{empty} \begin{titlepage} \begin{center}  %xyz  \end{center} \end{titlepage} \clearpage
Grid System in LaTeX Changing the color of the path in Terminal.app I would like the CasebashMac:bfgenv chris$ part of the following line to appear in a different color in my terminal.  CasebashMac:bfgenv chris$ python Submitting a form by pressing enter without a submit button shade plane with a color function color(x,y) Temporarily deleted answer missing from asker's inbox I  and . This answer does not appear in my inbox. I never saw a notification, and as of now the latest notification from CS is  {"SiteUrl":"cs.stackexchange.com","FaviconUrl":"https://cs.stackexchange.com/favicon.ico","CreationDate":"17 hours ago","Url":"https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/641/language-of-the-graph-of-an-affine-function/667#667","Title":"Language of the graph of an affine function","Summary":"Hint:\n\n$53 \\cdot 100000010000000000 + 4 = 5300000530000000004$.\n\nSketch:\n\n\n  ! Assume $a$ has $n$...","Type":"answers","Count":3,"IsNew":false}   This answer was posted, deleted and undeleted while I wasn't online. I suppose the deletion removed the entry from my inbox. Then the undeletion should have recreated an entry but didn't. Generalizing the case $p=2$ we would like to know if the statement below is true.  Let $p$ the smallest prime dividing the order of $G$. If $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ with index $p$ then $H$ is normal. Is Dragonstone unoccupied after Stannis Baratheon's defeat? Is anything known about Dragonstone after:      Stannis Baratheon is killed in his bid for the Iron Throne?   As the seat of the naval defense of King's Landing and the birthplace of Daenerys Targaryen, she has a vested interest in taking it.   At the conclusion of Season 6 Episode 10, is Dragonstone unoccupied? If G is a group, prove that $(ab)^n =a^nb^n$ implies G is abelian. I need to prove the equivalence of the following two statements, if $G$ is a group:     $G$ is abelian $\Leftrightarrow$  for each $a,b$ in $G$: $(ab)^n = a^n b^n$ for each integer $n$   I have done the $\Rightarrow$ implication, but I have no idea how to approach $\Leftarrow$, any hints are very welcome. I need something explained or corrected:  In my number theory class we proved that there are an infinite number of primes using Euler's Phi Totient. It went something like this:  Let $M = p_1 p_2 \dots p_n$ be the product of all primes. Consider $1 &lt; A \le M$:  Some prime must divide $A$, call it $q$. Since $q$ must be one of the primes, $q$ must divide $M.$  So the $gcd(A,M) &gt; 1.$ Thus $\phi(M) = 1$ ...?   Which is not even and contradicts the theorem that $\phi(N)$ is even for $N&gt;2.$ Therefore there exists an infinite number of primes.  I get confused by the statement "Thus $\phi(M) = 1$"....  Did i possibly copy this proof down wrong? or am I missing something? Thank you in advance.   Edit: by consider a such that...i meant consider an integer '$a$' I replaced it with $A$ to hopefully make it more clear.   Edit2: I'm sorry I am not familiar with using the equation editor. This is not a homework assignment, just studying for my exam. I just want to be able to understand this or clearify it. How does the simulation hypothesis relate to the ethics of simulated violence? Say, for the sake of this question,  is real. Are we then hurting "persons"/conscious beings in "our simulations" - video games - when we fight them? Why (not)? If so, is this unethical? Think for example about shooting an alien in the game No Man's Sky.  Edit/answer on the comment of Joseph Weissman: My reasoning is like this:   It is unethical to harm a person (with a person being everything that has ). By the simulation hypothesis (assuming it's true), everything around us (everything that we know of), is simulated. By 1 and 2, all persons we know of are simulated. So it's unethical to harm the simulated persons around us. A game is a simulation just like we are in a simulation, so the game has simulated persons. Therefore -  - it's unethical to harm the persons in a video game.   I know that the premises - besides the simulation hypothesis itself - are debatable, but that's the reason I asked the question in the first place.  I was also thinking that the characters in the video game differ because they have far less to no intelligence, that much of it is scripted. But I neither have a proof that we ourselves aren't scripted, with free will being an illusion. Also, how intelligent does a character in a simulation/video game has to be to have personhood then? I think this is a case of the .  Just to be sure, please note that this question is not about whether the simulation hypothesis is true or how likely it is to be true. It is about (one of the) consequences if the simulation hypothesis is true. It's also not a question about violence in games in general. Why Didn't People Think That Voldemort Died After His Attack on Baby Harry? After the Avada Kedavra curse rebounded from Harry onto Voldemort, Voldemort disappeared. I'm curious as to why so many key players believed Voldemort was still "alive" somewhere, his powers decimated, but, under the right circumstances, able to return to full power. It seems the witches and wizards in chapter one of Philosopher's Stone, The Boy Who Lived, were happy to believe that Voldemort was gone forever. Why didn't everyone believe Voldemort had died, rather than just disappeared? Was it the lack of a body? Or were there other reasons?  Here's a couple of quotes from Philosopher's Stone if anyone wants to review them. Otherwise, just disregard.     ‘A fine thing it would be if, on the very day You- Know-Who seems to have disappeared at last, the Muggles found out about us all. I suppose he really has gone, Dumbledore?’   ‘It certainly seems so,’ said Dumbledore. ‘We have much to be thankful for.’   Philosopher's Stone - page 13 - Bloomsbury - chapter 1, The Boy Who Lived   ‘But what happened to Vol– sorry – I mean, You-Know-Who?’   ‘Good question, Harry. Disappeared. Vanished. Same night he tried ter kill you. Makes yeh even more famous. That’s the biggest myst’ry, see ... he was gettin’ more an’ more powerful – why’d he go?   ‘Some say he died. Codswallop, in my opinion. Dunno if he had enough human left in him to die. Some say he’s still out there, bidin’ his time, like, but I don’ believe it. People who was on his side came back ter ours. Some of ’em came outta kinda trances. Don’ reckon they could’ve done if he was comin’ back.   ‘Most of us reckon he’s still out there somewhere but lost his powers. Too weak to carry on. ’Cause somethin’ about you finished him, Harry. There was somethin’ goin’ on that night he   hadn’t counted on – I dunno what it was, no one does – but somethin’ about you stumped him, all right.’   Philosopher's Stone - pages 46-47 - Bloomsbury - chapter 4, The Keeper of the Keys This is the gift that my dad sent (to) me This is the gift that my dad sent me on my birthday.   Vs   This is the gift that my dad sent to me on my birthday.  Is to required?   Also   Presenting you guys, the trailer of the film.   Vs   Presenting to you guys, the trailer of the film.    Is to required? Desperate to locate and re-read exceptional book/series, but cannot remember the title. The high concept: The U.S. has just sent the first successful expedition to Mars, and it has just landed. As the astronauts make their initial exploration outside their ship, a tear in the fabric of space opens up right in front of them, and they look through to the insides of a laboratory (at a California university?) and two students who just figured out how to create arbitrary portals between two points in the Universe. The rest of the novel/series is a consequence of this breakthrough. But I can't remember the author and title(s). Surely someone reading this forum will remember it well! TIA.  (Reposted .) How to sum 2 vectors in spherical coordinate system Very specific paragraph shape How can I completely remove NetworkManager? Is a +1/+1 counter I get from, say Unleash or Undying different than +1/+1 from something like  or ? Ruby can add methods to the Number class and other core types to get effects like this:  1.should_equal(1)   But it seems like Python cannot do this. Is this true? And if so, why? Does it have something to do with the fact that type can't be modified?  Update: Rather than talking about different definitions of monkey patching, I would like to just focus on the example above. I have already concluded that it cannot be done as a few of you have answered. But I would like a more detailed explanation of why it cannot be done, and maybe what feature, if available in Python, would allow this.  To answer some of you: The reason I might want to do this is simply aesthetics/readability.    item.price.should_equal(19.99)   This reads more like English and clearly indicates which is the tested value and which is the expected value, as supposed to:  should_equal(item.price, 19.99)   This concept is what  and some other Ruby frameworks are based on. What is the relationship between symmetry and degeneracy in quantum mechanics? Can a package overwrite the original commands in Latex? An example:  Without the amsmath package:   The equation environment numbers the equation automatically. The align environment cannot be executed.   With the amsmath package:   align and equation work seamlessly in numbering equations: I can use equation to write my first two equations, and align to write my third equation, and Latex will still number them correctly.   My questions are:   Is the code for the command equation after loading the amsmath package still the same as it was before loading the package? Moreover, if this is the case, then, in general, can loading different packages cause conflicts? And how do we avoid it?