Binding multiple CheckBoxes to single property in ViewModel I would like to bind multiple CheckBox items (IsChecked property) to a single property in my ViewModel.    The ViewModel property is called SelectedWeekdays (int) and is the sum of all the selected weekdays. The idea being that every possible combination of weekday values will always result in a unique sum. The weekdays are defined in an enum as such:  public enum Weekdays {     Monday = 1     Tuesday = 2     Wednesday = 4     Thursday = 8     Friday = 16     Saturday = 32     Sunday = 64 }   So for example if Tuesday and Thursday are selected on the View, this should result in a ViewModel property value of 10.  Likewise, if the ViewModel property changes, say to 3, the CheckBoxes for Monday and Tuesday should be checked.  I've looked at MultiBindings but it seems I could only use that to bind a single CheckBox to multiple values. Can you point me in the right direction?
How to bind RadioButtons to an enum? I've got an enum like this:  public enum MyLovelyEnum {     FirstSelection,     TheOtherSelection,     YetAnotherOne };   I got a property in my DataContext:  public MyLovelyEnum VeryLovelyEnum { get; set; }   And I got three RadioButtons in my WPF client.  &lt;RadioButton Margin="3"&gt;First Selection&lt;/RadioButton&gt; &lt;RadioButton Margin="3"&gt;The Other Selection&lt;/RadioButton&gt; &lt;RadioButton Margin="3"&gt;Yet Another one&lt;/RadioButton&gt;   Now how do I bind the RadioButtons to the property for a proper two-way binding?
Can you use Uncanny Dodge against extra damage effects? Can virtual particles be thought of as off-shell Fourier components of a field? I just found  blog post, which gives an interpretation of virtual particles I haven't seen before.  Consider a 1D system of springs and masses, where the springs are slightly nonlinear. A "real particle" is a regular $\cos(kx-\omega t)$ wavepacket moving through the line, where $\omega$ satisfies the dispersion relation $\omega = \omega(k)$. When two real particles collide, the region where they collide temporarily looks really weird, as they interact nonlinearly, pulling and pushing on each other.  Formally, we can write this weird region as the sum of a bunch of $\cos(kx-\omega t)$ waves, but there's no guarantee they'll have the right dispersion relation. Thus, each term in the resulting expansion is a off-shell "virtual particle". If you add up all the virtual particles, you get the actual intermediate field state, which is just a weird ripple in the field where the two particles are interacting.  As another example, consider the statement "a static EM field is made of virtual particles". Under this interpretation, what that really means is, "a static field (e.g. $1/r^2$) is not equal to $\cos(kx-\omega t)$, but may be expanded in terms of such sinusoids", which is much less mysterious sounding. In fact, this is exactly what we do when we consider scattering off a potential in normal QM, e.g. in the Born approximation.  The above gives some intuition for what a 'virtual particle' means in classical field theory. They are the Fourier components of the field with $(\omega, k)$ not satisfying the dispersion relation, and they are useful in classical perturbation theory. However, they are not propagating degrees of freedom, so they only appear during interactions.   The picture above is entirely classical. Does this picture generalize to quantum field theory, giving a physical intuition for virtual particles there? List of all active modules used in a site What may happen after a stack of spells resolves? Within the same phase, once a stack of spells has resolved in its entirety, is priority once again given to a player so that more spells may be cast?  For example:  I attack with a creature. Opponent opts not to block. Now, I want to buff (e.g. +3/+3) my creature multiple times, but I'm afraid of my opponent responding with a burn (e.g. Deal 3 damage) spell at the top of the stack. Can I buff once, ask if opponent wants to respond, then allow the stack to resolve. Then, in the same phase, cast more buff? Proof of "Dual normed vector space is complete" Crookshanks is Hermione's familiar in PoA, GoF, and OOTP. I cannot recall mention of Crookshanks following OOTP, though. What happened to Crookshanks? Does canon refer to Crookshanks in either HBP or DH? Creaking from cranks/spindle. How to fix? Numerical partial derivative What is included in Wolfram Extras? I'm having some trouble understanding cosets.  If I understand it correctly, cosets form a partition. So, if I have $|G:H| = 2$, then $G = H \cup xH$. Right?  In an exercise, I'm asked the following:  "For $G$ group and $H \le G$ such that $|G:H| = 2$, prove that $x^2 \in H$ for any $x \in G$"  If $x \in H$, then $x^2 \in H$ because $H$ is a group. But, if $x \notin H$, then $x \in gH$ for any $g \in G$, right? Then $x^2$ = $(gh)^2$ but I can't see why this is in $H$.  Can you give me some hint? Thanks for stopping by. Parallelize Bash script with maximum number of processes Lets say I have a loop in Bash:  for foo in `some-command` do    do-something $foo done   do-something is cpu bound and I have a nice shiny 4 core processor. I'd like to be able to run up to 4 do-something's at once.  The naive approach seems to be:  for foo in `some-command` do    do-something $foo &amp; done   This will run all do-somethings at once, but there are a couple downsides, mainly that do-something may also have some significant I/O which performing all at once might slow down a bit. The other problem is that this code block returns immediately, so no way to do other work when all the do-somethings are finished.  How would you write this loop so there are always X do-somethings running at once? Ignore citations in captions in list of figures when numbering When using the \cite command in figure captions and the ieeetr bibliography style, then  BibTeX numbers the citations as appearing earlier than they do in reality (i.e. the first citation in the document ends up being [42]).  Is there any way to get BibTeX to ignore the \listoffigures section when numbering? In Episode 1: The Phantom Menace, Anakin's mother, Shmi, said that he does not have a father, although it seemed to me that she doubted that.  Is there a canonical answer as to who Anakin's father is?  If so, who? Update Manager doesn't ask for a password Oneiric update manager no longer asks for a password to update already installed software.  This is a change in behavior from previous versions.  Is there a way to revert this behavior and get the Update Manager in Oneiric to ask for a password again?  Thanks! Is "am" in "I am right" an auxiliary verb? Consider these sentences:     The ice was thick enough to walk on.      They were in a hurry.      There is enough salt in it.      It is freezing.      I am right.   Are the italicized verbs auxiliary verbs?    Update: Let me explain why I asked this question.  The above sentences are from exercise 6 "Auxiliary verbs" from the book .  From the 36 sentences in exercise 6, all except the above mentioned five sentences are indeed sentences that contain auxiliary verbs (may, must, can, will, had, etc.).   So, what happened here? Why are those five sentences in this exercise? Is it an oversight?    View image in full resolution here: Show that if $a$ is an odd integer and $b$ is an even integer then $\gcd(a,b)=\gcd(a,b/2)$ Show that if $a$ is an odd en integer and $b$ is an even integer then $\gcd(a,b)=\gcd(a,b/2)$.  I understand that since $a$ is not divisible by $2$ but $b$ is, the gcd of $a$ and $b$ also can't be divisible by $2$ but I'm getting stuck using this to help me. What advantages does using (function(window, document, undefined) { ... })(window, document) confer? Which tube size to prefer if several options apply? I have 40-622 (a.k.a. 28x1.5") tires, and  offers  two different sizes of tubes - their models "17" and "19" - as applicable for that tire size.  Ok, either one would surely fit well. But apart from weight difference (150 vs. 220 grams), is there any reason to prefer one over another? Is it better to have as small &amp; light tube as possible? Or perhaps a bit larger and heavier one would be more durable, as it wouldn't be stretched as much? Err on which side? I am seeking suggestions on what may be going in with an iMac I am currently troubleshooting, as it’s displaying behaviour I do not recall seeing before.  Short story  This iMac refuses to boot up. It gets the Apple logo, gets past the progress bar, and then gets stuck on the grey screen for about two minutes before rebooting itself. However, what makes this odd is that I can:   Start the iMac in Target Disk Mode and use it to successfully boot up other Macs. In doing so everything seems to work perfectly fine. Successfully boot the iMac from an external drive and everything seems to work perfectly fine.   Long story  I was presented this iMac about 2 weeks ago as it refused to bootup. That is, it would commence booting up and cycle through the Apple logo and progress bar, but after the progress bar completed it would remain on the grey screen for a couple of minutes before rebooting itself and doing the same thing all over again.   To address this I undertook the following troubleshooting steps:   Resetting SMC - failed Resetting NVRAM - failed Starting up in Safe Mode - failed Starting up in OS X Recovery Mode – failed Starting up in OS X Recovery Mode via the internet – failed Undertook an extensive hardware test using Apple Hardware Test (AHT 3A213) - passed Started iMac in Target Disk Mode and retested hard drive using Scannerz on another iMac - passed Started iMac in Target Disk Mode and reformatted the hard drive and did a clean install of Mac OS X El Capitan 10.11.6 - successful Migrated data from a Time Machine backup - successful   After these steps I tested the iMac for four days with no issues in terms of booting up and using the computer. On the fifth day I needed to manually import seven Apple Mail mailboxes. I did these one by one and six of them imported within minutes.  The last mailbox was showing as being 270 GB in size. I knew this was inaccurate, but I decided to import the mailbox so I could do a mailbox rebuild to correct whatever corruption had taken place. This import took over 12hrs to do but seemed to work fine and Mail was displaying the emails.  I then tested the iMac on and off for another day to ensure it had no problems booting up. This was successful.  I then decided to initiate the mailbox rebuild, but as soon as I did the screen went black and stayed that way regardless of any keyboard shortcuts I tried using. I waited an hour, forced a reboot, and ever since the iMac has returned to its original behaviour of not booting up – it would get past the progress bar and stay on the grey screen for a while before rebooting itself and starting the whole vicious cycle again.  I have again retested the hard drive, processor, RAM and Video Ram by starting the iMac from an external hard drive and using a combination of the following packages:   Apple Hardware Test (AHT 3A213) Scannerz TechTool Pro Memtester (under the Homebrew subsystem)   And now I have a situation where I can boot the iMac from external hard drives, and also use it in target disk mode to boot up other Macs, but cannot use it to boot from its own internal drive.  At present I have isolated the internal hard drive and am running a scan to check for any malware.   In the meantime, I am wondering:   Has anyone come across a similar scenario and, if so, what was the cause? Assuming I find no malware, do I go through the reformat/clean install/migration process again, but this time not import the last mailbox and see whether the iMac works fine? Any other suggestions?   iMac specs are as follows:   iMac (27”, mid 2011) 3.1 GHz Intel Core i5 8 GB RAM AMD Radeon HD 6970M 1024 MB 1 TB 3.5” SATA HD Mac OS X El Capitan 10.11.6 I want to buy some stock photos like the ones below. What is this design called?  I don't even know how to start searching...