how to put personal info (address, phone) in header (2) Similar to the question here:  I am using modern cv casual style and want personal info (address, street, phone, email) in the header but below the horizontal line below my name. And this just in the first page. Could anybody help me with that?
Merging banking and casual style in moderncv (2) I really like the solution given in  but what to do if I want to keep the footer information of the casual style from page 2 on? That is, with this solution, I can put the header as I want in the first page, but the footer disappears from the rest of the pages and I do not want that.  I want the header of the first page to look like this (with an empty footer):   And the footer from the second page on to look like this:
Where can I get a device with 'Ubuntu for phones' pre-installed? Is it possible record videos of my screen? Suppose that I would like to record some video sessions of Angry Birds on my phone.   Are there any apps that I can use? I have root permissions. How to adjust font features in LuaTeX? As of version 2.7 of luaotfload the support for font feature files (.fea) .  On the  Hans showed how to make font substitution work through Lua.  More examples are available in the latest ConTeXt distribution (, , , , , , )  In the past I have been using font feature files to adjust the kerning of fonts on-the-fly.  From Hans' example it is not clear to me how to adjust kerning in the new syntax.  The below example does not work as intended.  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{fontspec} \directlua{ fonts.handlers.otf.addfeature {     name = "kern",     {         type = "pair",         data = {             [0x0041] = { [0x0056] = { false, { -200, 0, 0, 0 } } },         }     } } } \setmainfont{Latin Modern Roman} \begin{document} AV \end{document}   Can we have a comprehensive guide on how to adjust font features with LuaTeX with the fonts.handlers technique?    Related questions:  (These involve hooking into the luaotfload.patch_font callback) Google Chrome is not starting I've just installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS on dual boot. I've looked for many solutions and tried them all but Chrome never starts; the logo appears on the left but no window opens.  I downloaded the deb file on google chrome website and installed it through Ubuntu Software, but it doesn't start.   I have tried installing it through the command line with   sudo dpkg -i --force-depends google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb sudo apt-get install -f   I have checked with uname -a and my system is 64 bit. I have also tried gdebi with the same result.   My repository universe is up to date.  I only have one display in settings>displays> so I can't turn off built-in display nor check the mirror display (I read it could be the problem as I also have a graphic card but it seems it is not in my case).  Here is what I get in the command line when I try to run Chrome from it ( the message is the same, whatever the method I used to install Chrome):  ~$ google-chrome [11831:11831:1122/114854.195473:ERROR:process_singleton_posix.cc(433)] readlink failed: Permission denied (13) [11831:11831:1122/114854.195493:ERROR:process_singleton_posix.cc(256)] readlink(/home/basil/.config/google-chrome/SingletonLock) failed: Permission denied (13) [11831:11831:1122/114854.195508:ERROR:process_singleton_posix.cc(256)] readlink(/home/basil/.config/google-chrome/SingletonLock) failed: Permission denied (13) [11831:11831:1122/114854.195515:ERROR:process_singleton_posix.cc(280)] Failed to create /home/basil/.config/google-chrome/SingletonLock: Permission denied (13) [11831:11831:1122/114854.195538:ERROR:process_singleton_posix.cc(433)] readlink failed: Permission denied (13) [11831:11831:1122/114854.195564:ERROR:process_singleton_posix.cc(256)] readlink(/home/basil/.config/google-chrome/SingletonLock) failed: Permission denied (13) [11831:11831:1122/114854.195622:ERROR:chrome_browser_main.cc(1498)] Failed to create a ProcessSingleton for your profile directory. This means that running multiple instances would start multiple browser processes rather than opening a new window in the existing process. Aborting now to avoid profile corruption. [11831:11868:1122/114854.209297:ERROR:browser_gpu_channel_host_factory.cc(108)] Failed to launch GPU process.   Any new approach will be much appreciated How to install TeX on Android phones? I used  app in my Android phone. But this app does not support XeLaTeX and requires an internet connection to be used.  Is there any distribution of TeX for Android? How I can install TeX on my Android phone? For almost a year now, I have been in the uncomfortable position of having an idea.  However, there is one nice thing about this idea.  It makes a concrete, exact and relatively easy to test physical prediction.  The idea predicts that there is a 11,187 m/s (Earth’s escape velocity) aethereal wind directly into the surface of the Earth at its surface.  I believe it would be possible to test this by performing a vertical variation of modern versions of the Michelson-Morley experiment (MMX) with one arm pointed in the vertical direction. ()  In 2003, Müller et al. performed a normal (2 horizontal orthogonal arms) modern MMX using cryogenic optical resonators that found a “possible anisotropy of the speed of light c, (of) 2.6 +/- 1.7 parts in 10^15” (  )  In a brief conversation with Holger Müller a Professor at Berkeley and the lead author of that paper, he stated that to this knowledge no one had ever performed a variation of the experiment using a vertical arm.  He also mentioned that such an experiment would be complicated by the fact that gravity would slightly compress the length of the vertical bar making two equal length bars no longer equal in length.  “They haven't been done as far as i know. The problem is that any interesting physics signal would be hard to tell from a large signal from stretching of the arms under their own weight.” - H. Müller  I am interested in attempting to run this experiment myself.  To that end, I have the following questions:   Given current Physics understanding, is there any reason to expect that such a vertical variation of the MMX wouldn’t return the exact same results as all other MMXs, namely that there is no anisotropy in the speed of light? Given the complications mentioned by Professor Müller, are there reasonable methods available to overcome them?  Especially considering the size of the effect (c + 11,187m/s vs c) is substantially larger than the accuracy obtained in his and similar modern MMXs. What is the order of magnitude cost of such an experiment?  If I am to fund this personally, would such a project cost \$10,000?  \$100,000? \$1,000,000? more?   Any insight offered on this topic will be greatly appreciated.  EDIT: For what its worth, for people looking at this years later.  As I originally alluded to in a comment to [WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance]'s much appreciated and comprehensive answer.  While, I've become increasingly comfortable with the idea that there is a flow of aether or spacetime or whatever you want to call it into the Earth at 11km/s; I strongly believe that a vertical MMX would return the same null result as the horizontal one.  And I believe it will do so because of length contraction; that length contraction exactly masks any anisotropy of the speed of light by ensuring that the roundtrip time of light in any direction is a constant; that length contraction ensures Lorentz co-variance. It is stated that if $\psi(x_0)=\psi'(x_0)=0$ at some $x_0$, then $\psi(x)=0,\forall x$.  Hence, we cannot have the wavefunction and its derivative vanishing at the same point.  My question is, how to prove the above statement? Why is cd not a program? How do I boot from ISO file stored on hard disk? When a star becomes a black hole, does its gravitational field become stronger? Practical way to implement prevention of IP Spoofing I am an undergraduate Computer Science student and was hoping to gain some knowledge of ways to help prevent IP spoofing but all the resources I have tried out elaborate this concept in a theoretical way. I want to try out my hands at one of the techniques like:      How do I simulate this whole situation in my own system were I myself am the attacker and I myself have to defend it? And once I have gained an understanding of it, then how do I start translating that into programming terms? Why is time special? In Special Relativity, the spacetime interval between two events is $s^2 = -(c{\Delta}t)^2+({\Delta}x)^2+({\Delta}y)^2+({\Delta}z)^2$ giving the Minkowski metric $\eta_{\mu\nu}=\text{diag}(-1, 1, 1, 1)$. What is the justification for making time have a negative coefficient, and how closely is that related to the 2nd law of thermodynamics? Sure, by letting $\eta = \text{diag}(1, 1, 1, 1)$, we get a pretty boring spacetime, and the boosts in the Poincaré group become trig instead of hyperbolic functions, but what's the physical reasoning behind this? Why is Git not found after installing OS X Lion? Two list-boxes, side by side, one with available items, the other with selected items, with arrows in between to move items back and forth. Accourding to ,   We often use "been to" when we refer to completed visits to a place:  Have you ever been to Budapest?  Not: Have you ever gone to Budapest?  If the visit is not complete, we use "gone to".  Joan’s just gone to the shop. She’ll be back in about ten minutes. (Joan has not yet returned from the shop.)  Joan’s just been to the shop. She bought some cakes. Would you like one? (Joan has returned from the shop.)  Now, does that rule apply to the  "Have been on a trip" &amp; "Have gone on a trip"?  So, "I have been on a trip" (I completed the trip &amp; currently I am staying at home)  "I have gone on a trip" (I haven't completed the trip &amp; currently I am on the trip)  And what about "gone crazy" &amp; "been crazy".  Does "He has gone crazy" mean now he is still crazy?  Does "He has been crazy" mean now he is not crazy any more?  Are there any differences between "Have been on a trip" vs "Have gone on a trip" and "Have been crazy" vs "Have gone crazy"?  Note: I am not asking about "been to" or "gone to". I am asking about "been on a trip" &amp; "gone on a trip". Do we apply the same rule of "been to" or "gone to" to "been on a trip" &amp; "gone on a trip"?  Note2:  seems to prove that my thinking is right. I know that for a Banach space $X$ and a linear functional $T:X\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ in its dual $X'$ the following holds: \begin{align}T \text{ is continuous } \iff \text{Ker }T \text{ is closed}\end{align} which probably holds for general operators $T:X\rightarrow Y$ with finite-dimensional Banach space $Y$. I think the argument doesn't work for infinite-dimensional Banach spaces $Y$. Is the statement still correct? I.e. continuity of course still implies the closedness of the kernel for general Banach spaces $X,Y$ but is the converse still true? How to cross-reference items in description lists? Every now and then I use the description list environment  \begin{description} \item[foo]  foo is good \item[bar]  bar is bad \end{description}   to create lists with non-numerical labels. Unfortunately the description list does not support the label-reference pair as normal latex: i.e. if I write  \begin{description} \item[foo] \label{foo} foo is good .... \end{description} .... For good things (see, for example \ref{foo})...    the reference does not point to the item in the list. Instead it points to the closest environment that supports labeling (usually the subsection). So instead of showing the text foo (in boldface), it shows something like 2.2.1 (the subsection corresponding to where the description environment is sitting).  My question: is there a way or a package which allows references to description list items? My current work-around is to just type the text myself in the spot (since I named it myself, and it is not numbered, the formatting is unlikely to change the label =). But one of the good things about the label/reference pairs in latex is the implementation in pdflatex that allows in PDF hyperlinks between references and the objects referred to, this I cannot replicate myself.   Edit: let me rephrase my question. The primary goal is not to display \ref to something other than what LaTeX thinks the \label is. There are many ways to deal with it, some of which outlined in Michael Underwood's helpful answer below. What I am looking at is whether there exists an implementation of a list environment which is like the built-in description environment in that the displayed "title" for the list item is completely customized, while having support for \labels. (The built-in description environment does not support \labels, whereas the built-in enumerate environment does not support customized "title"s.) The enumitem package adds some customizability to the environments, but as far as I can tell it doesn't support exactly what I want. Quoting within $(command substitution) in Bash I'd like to find a Windows batch counterpart to Bash's $@ that holds a list of all arguments passed into a script.   Or I have to bother with shift? I have a .txt file with numbers ordered like this (on the same row):  106849_01373    106849_01967    106850_00082    23025.7_01059      I would like to convert them like that:  106849_01373 106849_01967 106850_00082 23025.7_01059   I have no idea which command to use. Can somebody help me with this?