I am making a scene with a particle effect system in it, and I am wondering how I can take away the glow from the object. It is really bright, and it is not intended to look like that. Thanks
I've setup a plane with a particle emitter system. When I render the footage and the particles are glowing. Where do I find the settings for that?
Prove the equality: $\det\left[\begin{smallmatrix} -2a &a+b &a+c \\ b+a&-2b &b+c \\ c+a&c+b &-2c \end{smallmatrix}\right] = 4(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)$ i have to prove:   $$\begin{vmatrix} -2a &amp;a+b  &amp;a+c \\   b+a&amp;-2b  &amp;b+c \\   c+a&amp;c+b  &amp;-2c  \end{vmatrix} = 4(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)$$   I have tried many calculations between the rows and columns of the determinant to get to the answer i want to solve the exercise however none of them gave me something right. Can someone help? How to render text pixel-perfectly with subpixel antialising with Illustrator? A maximal ideal among those avoiding a multiplicative set is prime Let $S$ be a multiplicatively closed subset of a ring $R$, and let $I$ be an ideal of $R$ which is maximal among ideals disjoint from $S$. Show that $I$ is prime. If $R$ is an integral domain, explain briefly how one may construct a field $F$ together with a ring homomorphism $R\to F$. Deduce that if $R$ is an arbitrary ring, $I$ an ideal of $R$, and $S$ a multiplicatively closed subset disjoint from $I$, then there exists a ring homomorphism $f\colon R\to F$, where $F$ is a field, such that $f(x)=0$ for all $x\in I$ and $f(y)\neq 0$ for all $y\in S$.   [You may assume that if $T$ is a multiplicatively closed subset of a ring, and $0\notin T$, then there exists an ideal which is maximal among ideals disjoint from $T$.]  Here is a question I need to answer. For the first part I can show if $x, y$ are not in $I$ then nor does $xy$. The second part is just the field of fractions.   For the third part, I think I need to find an ideal $J$ containing $I$ such $J$ is prime, so that $R/J$ is an integral domain, and use the second part. To find $J$ prime, I think as suggested by the hint, I should go for a maximal ideal disjoint from $S$ containing $I$, but how can I do that? How can I retrieve data within my widget I have a Widget which I am creating but my quesiton is how do I access my custom table which I created via my plugin. I am attempting to fill the dropdown from the table called tfp which contains the column liters which I wish to popluate the values into the drop down   class my_plugin extends WP_Widget {  // constructor function my_plugin() {         parent::WP_Widget(false, $name = __('Thomsons Fuels Widget', 'wp_widget_plugin') );  }  // widget form creation function form($instance) {  //Check values if( $instance) {  $title = esc_attr($instance['title']);  $dropdown= esc_attr($instance['dropdown']);  $textarea = $instance['textarea'];  } else {  $title = '';  $textarea = ''; } ?&gt;   &lt;p&gt; &lt;label for="&lt;?php echo $this-&gt;get_field_id('dropdown'); ?&gt;"&gt; &lt;?php _e('Liters',   'wp_widget_plugin'); ?&gt;&lt;/label&gt; &lt;select&gt; &lt;option value="volvo"&gt;Volvo&lt;/option&gt; &lt;/select&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;   How I created the table in the plugin   global $wpdb; global $custom_table_example_db_version;  $table_name = $wpdb-&gt;prefix . 'tfp'; // do not forget about tables prefix  // sql to create your table // NOTICE that: // 1. each field MUST be in separate line // 2. There must be two spaces between PRIMARY KEY and its name //    Like this: PRIMARY KEY[space][space](id) // otherwise dbDelta will not work $sql = "CREATE TABLE " . $table_name . " (   id int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,   liters VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,   price VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,      postcodearea varchar(20) NULL,         dft varchar(20) NULL,   PRIMARY KEY  (id) );";  // we do not execute sql directly // we are calling dbDelta which cant migrate database require_once(ABSPATH . 'wp-admin/includes/upgrade.php'); dbDelta($sql);  // save current database version for later use (on upgrade) add_option('custom_table_example_db_version', $custom_table_example_db_version); I have located where the error message originates from it is in  line number 221. As I have only a single nvidia driver installed I suspect it is is the same issue. I am not a developer but looking at the code preceding this line I can see the statement.  const char *glob_pattern = "/usr/lib/nvidia-[1-9][0-9][0-9]"  this will pick up nvidia-352/ nvidia-361/ and nvidia-361-prime/ ? on my PC. How can one motivate the relativistic momentum? How can I stream the same music to multiple computers? Is there a way to stream the same playlist on multiple computers at the same time? I want to be able to sync what's playing on multiple computers (for parties etc). Ping a site in Python? NFS: mount.nfs: Protocol not supported When to choose checked and unchecked exceptions In Java (or any other language with checked exceptions), when creating your own exception class, how do you decide whether it should be checked or unchecked?  My instinct is to say that a checked exception would be called for in cases where the caller might be able to recover in some productive way, where as an unchecked exception would be more for unrecoverable cases, but I'd be interested in other's thoughts. Who is / was the "Lord of the Rings"? Who is the Lord, as referred to in the title? Frodo? Sauron? Someone else? Or is it more of an abstract title, not referring to a single person, like "He who wields the One Ring"? How do you prove the follwing $|\sqrt[n]{x}-\sqrt[n]{y}| \le \sqrt[n]{|x-y|}$ how do you prove this inequality? $|\sqrt[n]{x}-\sqrt[n]{y}| \le \sqrt[n]{|x-y|}$ At first glance I thought the triangle inequality would be useful but it's not form what I see. If I raise everything to the power of n I get the following: Possibility 1 (n uneven) : $|x + ... -y| \le |x-y|$ I guess I would have to prove that ... $\le$ 0 but I don't know how to do that. Possibility 2 (n even) : $|x + ... +y| \le |x-y|$ Same as above but now I have to prove that ... $\le$ -y. Am I even on the right track here? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. How to show that the determinant of the following $(n\times n)$ matrix  $$\begin{pmatrix} 5 &amp; 2 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; 0 \\ 2 &amp; 5 &amp; 2 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 2 &amp; 5 &amp; 2 &amp; 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; 0 \\ \vdots &amp; \vdots&amp; \vdots&amp; \vdots &amp; \vdots &amp; \vdots &amp; \vdots \\ 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; \cdots &amp; 0 &amp; 2 &amp; 5 &amp; 2 \\ 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; \cdots &amp; \cdots &amp; \cdots &amp; 2 &amp; 5 \end{pmatrix}$$  is equal to $\frac13(4^{n+1}-1)$?    More generally:     How does one compute the determinant of the following  (where the three diagonals are constant)?      $$M_n(a,b,c) = \begin{pmatrix} a &amp; b &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; 0 \\ c &amp; a &amp; b &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; c &amp; a &amp; b &amp; 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; 0 \\ \vdots &amp; \vdots&amp; \vdots&amp; \vdots &amp; \vdots&amp; \vdots &amp; \vdots \\ 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; \cdots &amp; 0 &amp; c &amp; a &amp; b \\ 0 &amp; \cdots &amp; \cdots &amp; \cdots &amp; \cdots &amp; c &amp; a \end{pmatrix}$$      Here $a,b,c$ can be taken to be real numbers, or complex numbers.   In other words, the matrix $M_n(a,b,c) = (m_{ij})_{1 \le i,j \le n}$ is such that $$m_{ij} = \begin{cases} a &amp; i = j, \\ b &amp; i = j - 1, \\ c &amp; i = j + 1, \\ 0 &amp; \text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$$  There does not seem to be an easy pattern to use induction: the matrix is not a diagonal  of the type $M = \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} A &amp; C \\ 0 &amp; B \end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ (where we could use $\det(M) = \det(A) \det(B)$ for the induction step), and there are no lines or columns with only one nonzero entry, so  gets complicated quickly.  Is there a general pattern that one could use? Or is the answer only known on a case-by-case basis? It's possible to compute the determinant by hand for small $n$:  $$\begin{align} \det(M_1(a,b,c)) &amp; = \begin{vmatrix} a \end{vmatrix} = a  \\ \det(M_2(a,b,c)) &amp; = \begin{vmatrix} a &amp; b \\ c &amp; a \end{vmatrix} = a^2 - bc \\ \det(M_3(a,b,c)) &amp; = \begin{vmatrix} a &amp; b &amp; 0 \\ c &amp; a &amp; b \\ 0 &amp; c &amp; a \end{vmatrix} = a^3 - 2abc \end{align}$$  But there is no readily apparent pattern and the computation becomes very difficult when $n$ gets large. Can a 3rd party charger damage my macbook pro? Finding the limit of $(1-\cos x)/x^2$ It seems Microsoft has tried to solve this problem .  In Windows 7, there is no boundary between monitors and the mouse can move freely across the top of the screen between my 3 monitors, provided I had set their heights equal in display settings. Windows 8 introduced sticky corners. See .  Windows 10 got sticky corners as well. There are a few pixels at the top corners of each display where the mouse cannot cross over onto the other display. One must move the cursor down to avoid this region in order to get to the next display.  The image shows roughly the region where mouse movement is not permitted in Windows 10, but is allowed in Windows 7.    Personally, I had no problem with unrestricted mouse movement across the top of my screens - I got used to "aiming" for the x, and the convenience of unrestricted cursor movement. Like all the people who wanted to disable it in W8, I'm wondering if there is a way to disable it in W10.  Edit to address possible duplicate:  Although the problem is identical to the one in , solutions to solve the problem in W8 involving editing the registry key MouseCornerClipLength do not work in W10, since that registry key is not present in W10. Also adding that key and setting the value doesn't work. I searched the entire registry and couldn't find it in another location. No other W10 keys in the node referenced in the W8 solution are obvious replacements.  Edit to address possible solutions in comments  harrymc's  and  that worked for for Windows 8.1 do not work in Windows 10. Folland, "Real Analysis", Chapter 5.3, Exercise 36. Folland, "Real Analysis", Chapter 5.3, Exercise 36:     Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a separable Banach space and let $\mu$ be   counting measure on $\mathbf{N}$.  Suppose that   $\left\{x_n\right\}_1^\infty$ is a countable dense subset of the unit   ball of $\mathcal{X}$, and define $T \colon L^1(\mu) \to \mathcal{X}$   by $Tf = \sum_1^\infty f(n) x_n$.  (a)  $T$ is bounded.  (b)  $T$ is   surjective.   I have proved (a).  I would like help on (b).  Here are my ideas so far.    Say we want to show $y \in \mathcal{X}$ is in the image of $T$.  Reduce to the case $||y|| = 1$ and let $x_{n_m} \to y$.  My thought is to produce for each $N$ a function $f_N \in L^1(\mu)$ such that $||y - \sum_n^\infty f(n)x_n|| &lt; 1/N$ and also such that the $f_N$ converge in $L^1(\mu)$ to some $f \in L^1(\mu)$.  Then use the continuity of $T$ to conclude $T(f) = y$.    The way I have been setting up my inequalities is as follows. Pick $M_N$ such that for all $m &gt; M_N$, $||y - x_{n_m}|| &lt; 1/N$.  Then I want to define $f_N$ so that $$\sum_n^\infty f_N(n) = \sum_{m &gt; M_N}^\infty f_N(m) = 1, $$ hence $$||y - T(f_N)|| = ||\sum_{m &gt; M_N}^\infty f_N(m) y + \sum_n^\infty f_N(n)x_n|| \leq \sum_{m &gt; M_N}^\infty f_N(m) || y - x_{n_m} || &lt; \frac{1}{N}. $$  Presumably, if the $f_N$ are appropriately chosen, then I can find a dominating function and apply the Dominated Convergence Theorem to finish up.    However, getting all these hypotheses to hold simultaneously has been difficult.  In essence, the difficulty seems to be in requiring that the $f_N$ be "normalized" as well as possess a dominating function.  If this method is feasible, at least it seems to require a bit of analysis to show the desired series all converge.  Perhaps I am missing something cleaner.  If so, a simpler solution would be much appreciated.    -Thanks. Finding volume of a segment I want to enable telnet on Windows 10.  I only see a telnet client but not a telnet server.  There is a web page telling me to open server manager and do a lot of stuff.  But, I don't have a server manager.  Please help!  I want to enable telnet. In episode 10 of Full Metal Alchemist: Brotherhood, during the events in the Research Lab 5, Edward Elric is severely hurt. Later in the hospital, he writes down everything he had come to know, and he discusses with Alphonse, Hughes, and Armstrong about what to do with the information to continue the investigation.  At this point, King Bradley arrives with lemon into the room. He finds out what they are doing but acts very calm and chilled out and allows them to continue investigation while being careful.  Why did he not get Hughes and Armstrong killed at that point? Or at least tell them to not investigate at all?