For example, if you're at your BIOS screen or a DOS environment, when you plug in a new USB keyboard, it appears to be usable almost instantly. But, if you are in Windows and plug in a new keyboard, it has to install drivers or updates, making it unusable for the duration. I realize that you don't get full features of certain keyboards in DOS, so Windows has to install drivers for added functionality. But why doesn't the keyboard start working with basic functionality instantly and continue to install the rest of the drivers if needed, obviously the technology is there to make this happen.  This is more for curiosity than to solve a problem, but any insight is appreciated!  Thanks
What does a "Legacy USB Mouse" option in a BIOS mean?  Yes legacy usually means older revision, or obsolete. So legacy usb mouse means support for "old style usb mouses".     That's not really answering the question. As Mr. Tamm, my high school electricity teacher, liked to say, "Yes, and oranges taste orangey."   What does legacy USB mouse support mean?   What is a legacy USB mouse?  There's an "old style" USB mouse?  What changed between what version of usb and what version of usb that made mice incompatible? Why was the change made?  When was the change made? Who made the change? What was the virtue of the "new USB mouses" over the "old USB mouses"?   Put it another way:     What is the BIOS doing when "Legacy USB Mouse" option is enabled?   What is the BIOS doing when "Legacy USB Mouse" option is disabled?   See also
What I want is to create a bootable pen drive that shows GRUB menu and I can select any of the several bootable systems from there to install/run. I have several ISO images that I want to install in the USB like Ubuntu, Fedora, System Rescue CD, Windows XP and Windows 7 (The windows versions are optional, mostly am looking for a multi installer for Linux distros, specially Ubuntu version)  The default Startup Disk Creator only works with Linux Images and only 1 at a time (At least for the mean time. If it allows more systems and multiple ISOs it would be awesome)  What method exists that I can use step by step to create a bootable USB Drive with multiple images than can be booted from the USB and selected from GRUB. It must support Windows Images and Linux Images.  Alternatively, is there also a way to have multiple versions of the Ubuntu installation ISO on same USB Drive, such as, when booting from it, I get to choose what Ubuntu version and architecture to install, for example:     BOOT MENU   Ubuntu 12.04 32 Bit   Ubuntu 12.04 64 Bit   Ubuntu 12.10 32 Bit   Ubuntu 12.10 64 Bit   UPDATE: Wanted to add that the English version for the post mentioned by daithib8 is here: What the reason the number of lines differs?  $ head -n 100000 ./access.log &gt; ./data/log.sample $ cat $_ | wc -l 1933424 Minecraft extra folders? Once I click to run minecraft a small window appears saying "Downloading runtime", then three other folders appear onto my desktop: Game, Native Log, and Runtime. This really annoys me, as I have to keep deleting them after I am done with a session of minecraft. Why is this? It never use to happen before. What are the primary differences between the rules of D&D 3.5 and Pathfinder? What are some of the rule changes that Pathfinder brings in comparison to D&amp;D 3.5?  I am curious what changes were made so I can explain to my group what it has to offer. When to use \LetLtxMacro? Frequently I see users redefine macros using (for example)  \let\oldmacro\macro% Store \macro in \oldmacro \renewcommand{\macro}{%   % ...redefined \macro   \oldmacro% }   and other times they use  \usepackage{letltxmacro}% http://ctan.org/pkg/letltxmacro \LetLtxMacro{\oldmacro}{\macro}% Store \macro in \oldmacro \renewcommand{\macro}{%    % ...redefined \macro   \oldmacro% }   Why would one use \LetLtxMacro when \let works just as well? Or, more specifically, when would one use \LetLtxMacro and/or why? Are punches with Gauntlets of Ogre Strength magical, improvised weapon attacks? My Gnoll Paladin just got the Gauntlets of Ogre Strength from Phandelver the other day, and it got me wondering:    Would it be possible/make sense for punches using them to count as an improvised weapon? (Since I'm not punching with empty fists, I'm wearing magical gauntlets) If so, would punches from a person using them count as magical weapon damage? Low Quality Posts you Have Already Flagged I just discovered that it is possible to get a post in the Low Quality Posts review queue that you have already flagged for closing, making reviewing that item impossible. Obviously, I don't want to 'Looks Good' something that I know should be closed, but at the same time I cannot 'Recommend Close' something I have already flagged leaving the only option being to skip the post.  Can the queue be changed so that it does not show posts which you have already flagged? Simple way of creating jQuery Slider How to understand the Ubuntu file system layout? In Windows there’re perhaps only a couple of important folders (by important I mean important in my logical picture of the Windows file system) in the installation drive (in my case C:\). Namely Program Files and Windows. I simply stay away from Windows folder and the “add remove program files” is good enough to handle the program files folder of Windows. Of course there’s a folder named Users where the users (who are not admins) can access only their folders.  Thus there’s a clear picture at some level in my mind of the Windows file system. In Ubuntu, when I reach the location /, there’s a huge list of folders, most of which I have no clue as to what they contain. The /bin folder seems to be the equivalent of the Windows folder in windows. The /usr folder seems like it’s the equivalent of the Users folder in Windows. But even the /home folder looks like it can fit the bill.  Please understand that I do understand, that Ubuntu (Linux) has a different character than that of Windows, i.e., there need not be exact equivalent of Windows functions, in Ubuntu. All I am looking for is a bit more clearer picture of the Ubuntu file system.   This question is a part of a bigger question which I am splitting up to make it more answerable. The original question can be found here: When is the order of convergence of Newton-Raphson greater than 2? If some function $f$ has a simple root at $x_*$ then I know that the order of convergence of the Newton-Raphson iteration is at least 2. But when is this order strictly greater than 2? Movie/TV series with a scene of spiky, black goo growing out of a lab container? There was a scene from a sci-fi horror video, not animated, don't know if it's a movie or TV series, where there was this black goo in a glass container and some scientists were looking at it under a microscope.   The pitch black goo grew and grew so fast, eventually breaking out of the inner box and the scientists that were inside the "inner lab" were begging to get out but the scientists outside that inner lab refused to open the door. The black goo was spiky (had spikes).  It's not any of the "Alien" movies, "The Blob", "Life", or "The Thing". It's not vintage. It was made after 1990, I'm pretty sure. Why shouldn't we use words such as 'here' and 'this' in textlinks? Over the years of surfing on the web I have found numerous examples of people saying that you shouldn't use the word "here" in a textlink etc. Personally I like the idea of using the word, because it is so straightforward for your visitors to know where to click.  The only reason that I can truly think of is for SEO purposes. The word here doesn't have much value as a keyword as such.  I would like to know some other opinions on why we should/shouldn't use word like "this" and "here" in a textlink. Partial instead of full markers are shown in PGFplots When using  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pgfplots} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}         \begin{axis}                     \addplot             [                 red,                 solid,                 mark=x,                 domain=-3e-3:3e-3,                 samples=50             ]              {exp(-x^2/(2e-3^2))/(1e-3*sqrt(2*pi))};         \end{axis}     \end{tikzpicture}    \end{document}   the markers look fine, see    , but when I replace solid with, for instance, loosely dashed, so  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pgfplots} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}         \begin{axis}                     \addplot             [                 red,                 loosely dashed,                 mark=x,                 domain=-3e-3:3e-3,                 samples=50             ]              {exp(-x^2/(2e-3^2))/(1e-3*sqrt(2*pi))};         \end{axis}     \end{tikzpicture}    \end{document}   the markers only show partially instead of fully, see    . How can I use loosely dashed with full markers showing? How do I complete "Find the Bitizen"? In tiny Death Star, Palpatine has given me the mission "Find the Bitizen" with the text "Working for tips is acceptable. Find 1 Bitizen(s)."  I assumed I had to wait for one of the events where you have to find a "rebel scum" and tap on it to get rid of. One of those events finally popped up but it did not complete the mission.   How do I complete this mission? Why is $ 561 = 3*11*17 $ the smallest Carmichael number? Dark Souls 2 coop/invading problem I was playing Dark Souls II on my pc a lot. After about 200 hours of ingame time I found that I cant summon or invade anybody. I tried new characters and reinstalling but it didn't help. So any tips, and reasons. P.S. I didn't used any cheats. Regression - How do I know if my residuals are normally distributed? Performing a regression and need to find out if my residuals are normally distributed. Isomorphism of centers of isomorphic groups How to perform hard / cold reboot of iPhone or iPad? Ways to evaluate $\int \sec \theta \, \mathrm d \theta$ The standard approach for showing $\int \sec \theta \, \mathrm d \theta = \ln|\sec \theta + \tan \theta| + C$ is to multiply by $\dfrac{\sec \theta + \tan \theta}{\sec \theta + \tan \theta}$ and then do a substitution with $u = \sec \theta + \tan \theta$. I like the fact that this trick leads to a fast and clean derivation, but I also find it unsatisfying: It's not very intuitive, nor does it seem to have applicability to any integration problem other than $\int \csc \theta \,\mathrm d \theta$.  Does anyone know of another way to evaluate $\int \sec \theta \, \mathrm d \theta$?