Assuming two medium humanoid types with 5ft reach are the grappler/grappled and the thorn whip pulls the grappler 10ft against their will towards the caster. Does this satisfy the conditions to end a grapple per the final point of the grappled condition, quoted below:     The condition also ends if an effect removes the grappled creature from the reach of the grappler or grappling effect, such as when a creature is hurled away by the thunderwave spell.
A situation came up in my session where a fighter used his Shield Master Shove feature to shove a Giant Crocodile that was currently restraining another PC using it's bite+grapple ability.  I did a quick check at the time and did not find anything related to shove, although in the  condition description it states:     The condition also ends if an effect removes the grappled creature from the reach of the grappler or grappling effect, such as when a creature is hurled away by the thunderwave spell.   I ruled at the time that a shove would count in a similar way to being "hurled away" however I wasn't sure and said I would find more concrete information for the future.  I have searched high and low for somebody else asking this specific question but have yet to find it. I saw some reference to a Jeremy Crawford tweet about involuntary movement and grappling however I am unable to find it.  If a third party "shoves" a creature that is grappling another, does it only shove the grappler away, or does it move both the grappler and grappled?  I drew a diagram:   (; this question relates to if a third party shoves the grappler instead, so it's not a duplicate.)
Can Ruby import a .NET dll? I am interested in using/learning RoR in a project where I have to use a .NET dll. Is Ruby capable of importing a .NET dll? Is there a way to see who voted on your posts? Value passed with request.setAttribute() is not available by request.getParameter() Limit of $\cos(x)/x$ as $x$ approaches $0$ As the title says, I want to show that the limit of  $$\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\cos(x)}{x}$$  doesn't exist.  Now for that I'd like to show in a formally correct way that   $$\lim_{x\to 0^+} \frac{\cos(x)}{x} = +\infty$$  I'm sure this is right since $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+} \cos(x) = 1$ and $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+} x = 0$, but since $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+} x = 0$ I can't just say:  $$\lim_{x\to 0^+} \frac{\cos(x)}{x} = \frac{1}{\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+} x}$$   Things I tried: expand the fraction and use L'Hospital's rule (This didn't seem to yield results even though I tried quite a few things, should it? If it does, should it always work? It worked for similar problems) and going by the definition of the limit which didn't work for me either.  I'm grateful for any hints for doing this problem and similar problems especially. How to change "to" to "-" while displaying start and end date in views? !! Do not use the future tense after unless   [✓]  I won't go unless you go   [✘] [I won't go] unless you will go. [✘]   Why not? Even if the above is prescriptive, what may be some reasons? In my separate question , I quote: unless = if not. If not can precede future tense; so why can't unless?  Footnote:  motivated this. Floating point comparison When should you use struct and not class in C#? My conceptual model is that structs are used in times when the item is merely a collection of value types.  A way to logically hold them all together into a cohesive whole.  I came across these rules :   A struct should represent a single value. A struct should have a memory footprint less than 16 bytes. A struct should not be changed after creation.   Do these rules work? What does a struct mean semantically? Question mark or bold citation key instead of citation number I've browsed the forums and found a number of posts that have addressed this issue, but none of the solutions seem to work for me. I have the following script that I just copied from the bibtex home page to get familiar with it. Instead of the citation number I get a question mark. I compile using Latex+Bibtex+Latex+Latex+PDFLatex+ViewPDF just as has been previously suggested and the problem persists.   \documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{cite}  \begin{document}  \title{My Article} \author{Nobody Jr.} \date{Today} \maketitle  Blablabla said Nobody ~\cite{Nobody06}.  \bibliography{mybib} \bibliographystyle{plain} \end{document}   My bibliography (Bib.bbl)  @misc{ Nobody06, author = "Nobody Jr", title = "My Article", year = "2006" }    Looking at previous posts one thing that is concerning is that my .bbl looks empty as shown below. Further, I don't have a .blg  \begin{thebibliography}{}  \end{thebibliography} Differentiability implying continuity Theorem: If $f$ is finitely differentiable at $c$, then $f$ is also continuous at $c$.  But according to the definition, for a function to be differentiable at $c$, it need not even be defined at $c$, just that it should have a finite value in the vicinity of $c$.    My question: If function is not defined at $c$, how can it be continuous at $c$?  For example, say we have a straight horizontal line function which is broken at $x=1$, the function is defined at all the points except $x=1$, it has a finite value at all the points except $x=1$, since it is having a value in the nearby region of $x=1$ we say that it is differentiable at $x=1$ but can we say that it is continuous at $x=1$? Subgroups of $U(n)$ isomorphic to a direct sum of cyclic groups Calculating conditional entropy given two random variables I have been reading a bit about conditional entropy, joint entropy, etc but I found this: $H(X|Y,Z)$ which seems to imply the entropy associated to $X$ given $Y$ and $Z$ (although I'm not sure how to describe it). Is it the amount of uncertainty of $X$  given that I know $Y$ and $Z$? Anyway, I'd like to know how to calculate it. I thought this expression means the following:  $$H(X|Y,Z) = -\sum p(x,y,z)log_{2}p(x|y,z)$$  and assuming that $p(x|y,z)$ means $\displaystyle \frac{p(x,y,z)}{p(y)p(z)}$, then  \begin{align} p(x|y,z)&amp;=\displaystyle \frac{p(x,y,z)}{p(x,y)p(z)}\frac{p(x,y)}{p(y)}\\&amp;=\displaystyle \frac{p(x,y,z)}{p(x,y)p(z)}p(x|y) \\&amp;=\displaystyle \frac{p(x,y,z)}{p(x,y)p(x,z)}\frac{p(x,z)}{p(z)}p(x|y)\\&amp;=\displaystyle \frac{p(x,y,z)}{p(x,y)p(x,z)}p(x|z)p(x|y) \end{align} but that doesn't really help.  Basically I wanted to get a nice identity such as $H(X|Y)=H(X,Y)-H(Y)$ for the case of two random variables.  Any help?  Thanks By the year 1582 vs in 1582 1.In 1582, scientists pointed out that the calendar was 10 days behind the sun      2.By the year 1582, scientists pointed out that the calendar was 10 days behind the sun.   I wanted to know the difference between "by the year 1582" and "in 1582". If I type something like this:  {\itshape\LARGE   Dunt venim dolorerosto do odit   ametum vulla conum dolore   conulput in vero od el   Dunt venim dolorerosto do odit   ametum vulla conum dolore   conulput in vero od el }   it results in a block of 4 lines with narrow spacing between the 1st and 2nd line and between the 3rd and 4th line. Line spacing between the 2nd and 3rd line is normal.  I can't fully explaing it to myself so I am looking for a short description for this behaviour. I know for example that with a \par at the end of the text (inside the group), the calculation would correct. But I have no idea why... Induction Proof that $x^n-y^n=(x-y)(x^{n-1}+x^{n-2}y+\ldots+xy^{n-2}+y^{n-1})$ Did your team win the football match yesterday?         The weather was very bad, so we weren't playing.   vs     The weather was very bad, so we didn't play.   Is the first one not correct? Why is it? How do I create a Java string from the contents of a file? I've been using the idiom below for some time now. And it seems to be the most wide-spread, at least on the sites I've visited.  Is there a better/different way to read a file into a string in Java?  private String readFile(String file) throws IOException {     BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader (file));     String         line = null;     StringBuilder  stringBuilder = new StringBuilder();     String         ls = System.getProperty("line.separator");      try {         while((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {             stringBuilder.append(line);             stringBuilder.append(ls);         }          return stringBuilder.toString();     } finally {         reader.close();     } } UAE visit visa with expired passport number Difference between char *str="STRING" and char str[] = "STRING"? Update: this is a lengthy post, you can     Note: The quick language list refers to the list in the screenshot below, accessible throught the shortcut Win + Space bar  I have two languages for windows spell check in my system, English (United States) and French (Switzerland), but despite both languages being properly configured with "Swiss French" input keyboard, US Keyboard input keeps appearing on this list:    Here's the settings for English (United States) language, you can see the only input is "Swiss French":    Same for Français (Suisse), the only input is "Swiss French":    In the Control Panel, both are also set as Swiss French:    All my settings are set to use "language list":     Here's a few things that I already tried:   I already managed to remove it by some language configuration gymnastics, by adding and removing languages, it always eventually comes back I have already done this:  There's no mention of US Keyboard in my registry settings either:     Please help, I'm desperate, this is my third computer with Windows 10 and they all do the same thing.