A new mechanic in Mario kart 8 is the hang gliders, which allow you to steer your character in the air after a big jump. For maximum speed, should I try to maximize air time, by aiming upwards or minimize air time by aiming downwards? Or is it faster to do neither, and stay level vertically?
There are some sections of tracks that allow you to deploy your hang glider or parachute.  This allows you to glide in relative safety until you hit the track again.  But you can also hit forward or back on the control stick to tilt down or up, respectively.  Is there an advantage to staying in the air?  Or does heading back down towards the track give you more speed than just gliding along?
Strictly increasing sequence $\{ a_k \}$ of positive integers such that $\sum 1/{a_k}$ is finite Aufbau principle in modern quantum theory Should I have more than one brokerage account? I have my brokerage business with one particular well-known US brokerage house. I find being able to access my retirement accounts and personal investment accounts through the one interface useful.  However, I was talking with a friend of mine and she said she never puts more than about $50k into any particular brokerage account.  Managing three or four such accounts seems like too much overhead for me. I'd prefer to spend my "investment time" reading up on my investments and researching new ones.  One reason to have more than one brokerage account with different houses is the issue of  insurance:     Within limits, SIPC expedites the return of missing customer property by protecting each customer up to $500,000 for securities and cash (including a $250,000 limit for cash only).   What other reasons could I have to use more than one brokerage account? Fiber from $S^1$ to $\mathbb{R} P^1$ that does not admit a section. Consider the map $q:S^1 \to \mathbb{R} P^1$ given by $v \mapsto \mathbb{R} v$. I want to show that this map does not admit sections. I've previously shown that $S^1$ is diffeomorphic to $\mathbb{R} P^1$ but this doesnt seem to be of much help. I've also shown that $TS^1$ is trivial, however I don't see how to use this. My only idea is that such a section wouldn't be well defined since it could go to either antipidal points when composing with $q$. Any hint or help with this would be amazing! Latest NVIDIA driver on Ubuntu 16.04 Standard error of regression coefficient without raw data Finding an item in a List using C# Looking for a post-apocalyptic trilogy where pilot is nursed back to health by natives of the land I read a series of books around 2005. I think it might have been a trilogy.  Basic story line is in a post apocalyptic world. The main character is a pilot for the Federation or something similar to that. He crash lands, is nursed back to health by the natives, comes to like and respect them, and does not want to fight against them.  Also in the later book I think it also involves another race who are very Japanese-ish. They drink sake and the "clan" names are things like Fu-Jitsu and Mitsu-Bishi. Suppose $X$ is a finite set and $f : X \to X$ is a function. Then $f$ is injective if and only if $f$ is surjective. Is there a good reason to use "printf" instead of "print" in java? How to format a duration in java? (e.g format H:MM:SS) How do I open a terminal? Possible Duplicate:             I just got ubuntu running on my computer and now I am ready to write a program...but I can't figure out how to open a command terminal. I guess I don't know where to find which version I am running either. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. $\exp(A)$ is orthogonal iff $A$ is skew symmetric Let $A \in M_n(\mathbb R)$ and $\exp(A)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{A^i}{i!}$. How to prove $\exp(A)$ is an orthogonal matrix iff $A^t=-A$?  I can get that $\exp(A)$ is an orthogonal matrix iff $\exp(A^t)=\exp(-A)$, but how to get $A^t=-A$ from it?  What's more, is $\exp(A)$ injective or not? EJB 3.1 Dependency Injection Failed Is it possible to include the tag-wiki associations in the Data Explorer? To do this would require two additional columns in the postTags table that associate a tag wiki excerpt and a tag wiki to their tag.  The tag wiki data is already available in the posts table. But there is no way to associate this data with its tags. The SEDE schema lacks the required columns to link the tag excerpt and the tag wiki to the tags table.  Additionally, the postTypes table only lists three posts types. It makes no mention of tag-wiki and tag excerpt posts. Perhaps the postypes table can be updated to reflect the additional post types? Why there's a finite $\Gamma '$ such that $\Gamma ' \vDash \varphi$? Suppose $\Gamma$ is an infinite set of formulas in FOL. It is given that for a structure, $M$: If $\Gamma$ is satisfiable in $M$ then $\varphi$ is valid in $M$.  Why is it true that there's some finite $\Gamma ' \subset \Gamma$, such that $\Gamma ' \vDash \varphi$?   It reminds the compactness theorem in a way, but it's not quite the same. Noticed in :         is 320, shown 322. Also locked in 2013.  And then :         has a score of 179, shown 180.  has a score of 123, shown 122.  Neither of these posts got any votes recently. Finding matrix $B$ is not zero matrix where $AB= 0$ I'm arriving to the US by air, but departing via land. How do I end form I-94 now that it is only electronic? I think that all the zeros of the Riemann-Zeta function ${\zeta}( z ) = \frac{1}{1-2^{1-z}} \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^{n+1}} \sum_{k = 0}^{n} (-1)^k \binom{n}{k} (k+1)^{-z}$  have real part smaller than 1, but I don't know how to prove it. If Re(z) > 1 than  ${\zeta}( z ) = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \left( \frac{1}{n} \right)^z$