I was using Blender for some time without issue. Recently I have found I am unable to save even a brand new document.  I am given the error message: "cannot open file  for writing: No such file or directory".  I have seen a similar post before which simply recommended blender needs to be run with administrator privileges. The account that is unable to save is the administrator.  I have posted a query to the microsoft forums but I also wished to see if there is a chance this is a blender issue.  Thanks
I installed blender for the first time, so I have the latest version, 2.78c.  I played with it for a bit.  Then I discovered I couldn't save my work.  I uninstalled it and reinstalled it.  Rebooted.  Same problem.  After a little testing, I realized I CAN save to my NAS storage drive.  I cannot save on my C: drive.  Any project.  Any folder.  C: always fails.  If I run blender as Administrator, it will save to the C: drive.  But not as my normal userid.  So it sounds like a bug of some kind.  I am running Windows 10.  Bitdefender A/V.  I use OneDrive.  I have a 2TB drive installed.  All clean and purring nicely.  Is there a better way to install it?  Or some change I can make (other than always running as administrator)?    Sounds like a bug - but hopefully there's a proper solution.  Thanks,  Jerry
Calculating the total number of surjective functions It is quite easy to calculate the total number of functions from a set $X$ with $m$ elements to a set $Y$ with $n$ elements ($n^{m}$), and also the total number of injective functions ($n^{\underline{m}}$, denoting the falling factorial). But I am thinking about how to calculate the total number of surjective functions $f\colon X \twoheadrightarrow Y $.  The way I thought of doing this is as follows: firstly, since all $n$ elements of the codomain $Y$ need to be mapped to, you choose any $n$ elements from the $m$ elements of the set $X$ to be mapped one-to-one with the $n$ elements of $Y$. This results in $n!$ possible pairings. But the number of ways of choosing $n$ elements from $m$ elements is $\frac{m!}{(m-n)!\,n!}$, so the total number of ways of matching $n$ elements in $X$ to be one-to-one with the $n$ elements of $Y$ is $\frac{m!}{(m-n)!\,n!} \times n! = \frac{m!}{(m-n)!}$.  Now we have 'covered' the codomain $Y$ with $n$ elements from $X$, the remaining unpaired $m-n$ elements from $X$ can be mapped to any of the elements of $Y$, so there are $n^{m-n}$ ways of doing this. Therefore I think that the total number of surjective functions should be $\frac{m!}{(m-n)!} \, n^{m-n}$.  Is this anything like correct or have I made a major mistake here? Re-Structuring a JSON Array Foreach Loop Prints Last Item Only Bluetooth is on but can't find or be found by any other devices.  Output of sudo service bluetooth status:  ● bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service    Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)    Active: active (running) since ხუთ 2015-06-04 22:33:18 GET; 13min ago  Main PID: 26678 (bluetoothd)    CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service            └─26678 /usr/sbin/bluetoothd -n  ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/HFPAG ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/HFPHS ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/A2DPSource ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/A2DPSink ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/HFPAG ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/HFPHS ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/A2DPSource ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.63 path=/MediaEndpoint/BlueZ4/A2DPSink ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: Adapter /org/bluez/26678/hci0 has been enabled ივნ 04 22:39:14 Rangoo bluetoothd[26678]: bluetoothd[26678]: Adapter /org/bluez/26678/hci0 has been enabled   Output of lsusb:  Bus 003 Device 005: ID 0a5c:21d7 Broadcom Corp. BCM43142 Bluetooth 4.0   How can I fix it? Proving ${n \choose p} \equiv \Bigl[\frac{n}{p}\Bigr] \ (\text{mod} \ p)$ Compactly supported continuous function is uniformly continuous With the confirmation that elements 113, 115, 117, and 118 are indeed fundamental elements that are now to be named on the periodic table, the next question is: what is the highest atomic number possible for an element? Feynman had a go at this years ago, and he derived (according to my limited understanding) that above element-137 (informally denoted 'Feynmanium') the electrons in the nearest orbit about the nucleus would be traveling at a velocity greater than the speed of light. (Note I am considering the Bohr model of the atom in this question.) I wished to demonstrate to my friends why this is and I came up with the following explanation.  According to Bohr's quantum condition, the angular momentum of an electron about the nucleus is given by $$ L=m_evr_n=n\hslash \implies r_n=\frac{n\hslash}{m_ev},$$ where $m_e$ is the mass of the electron, $v$ its velocity, $n$ an integer, and $r_n$ the radius of the $n$th possible orbit. Because we are concerned with the nearest orbit to the nucleus, $n=1$; and thus $$r=\frac{\hslash}{m_ev}.$$   Now, according to Coulomb's law, if the electron orbits about the nucleus the centripetal motion can be described by $$\frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\epsilon_or}=m_ev^2, $$ where $Z$ denotes the number of protons in the nucleus (the atomic number), and $e$ the elementary charge. Solving for $Z$ and substituting in $r$ from above yields $$Z=\frac{4\pi\epsilon_o \hslash v}{e^2}. $$ But what is $v$? Well, the maximum velocity an electron could ever have is the speed of light, and we wish to find the atomic number associated with an orbiting electron traveling at this speed, so we set $v=c$ and obtain our final result of $$Z=\frac{4\pi\epsilon_o\hslash c}{e^2}\approx 137.521,$$ which implies that for $Z&gt;137$, the electrons at a position of $n=1$ in the Bohr model would have a velocity $&gt;c$; and thus the highest atomic number achievable on the periodic table is 137.  Again, I just want to make sure this is a correct method for deriving element-137 before presenting. Perhaps one could explain how relativity plays a role here. I know Feynman used the Dirac equation to get this result...so could anyone (subsequently of course) expatiate on this in a simplistic manner? Thanks! Adding hyperlinks to pop-up data in qgis2web? Does anyone know if it is possible to add hyperlinks to image fields etc. in the pop-up windows of Qgis2web?  I've had a look in the layers javascript file, but the image source path isn't rendered using html, so I can't simply append &lt;a href" to it.  The image is coming in via the usual method of having a field that contains the path of the image file.  I'd like to achieve linking of the image, like in the example below. Alternatively, I could just populate the 'more info' field with the URL, but if I did that I'd like to avoid just doing it by having a field that contains the entire URL, as some may be quite long (these will only be internal links). Resistor in series needed with LED string? Book or web site resources for an absolute beginner to learn about stocks and investing? I'm completely new to the world of investing and stocks. Knowing that I shouldn't invest or buy stocks until I know it well enough, I was wondering which cheap or affordable resources would be the best to get started?  I've seen quite a lot of books and websites that teach investing, but it's hard to choose.  To narrow it down, what book and/or what website would you recommend that does a good job teaching investing in stocks to beginners? Isometry from Manhattan plane to Euclidean plane? Does there exist an isometry from a Manhattan plane $A$ to a Euclidean plane $B$? I.e. a function $\varphi:A \to B$ that suffices $\|\varphi(a)\|_B = \|a\|_A$ for all $a \in A$, where  $\| \cdot \|_A$ is the Manhattan norm and $\| \cdot \|_B$ the Euclidean norm. Understanding QGIS buffer tool units I  have had no luck getting the buffer tool to accept anything but degrees as units of measure.  I have found lots of stuff saying the layer needs to be reprojected and saved but it hasn't worked at all for me.   Is there a way I could create a buffer without using ftools or at least force the units to meters somehow?  As a workaround I converted meters to degrees (lat) and used that but the final product needs to be as close to reality as possible.  Things I've tried:   setting every unit option I could find to meters (where possible). setting everything to NAD83/Maryland (data is for Washington, DC) and saving it as such (as layers in ESRI shape files). reimporting the reprojected layers setting relevant layers to Google Mercator   The was tried followed by creating a buffer. Many were tried in combination. QGIS 1.7.3 Slackware64 current (qgis from SBo-13.37 repo, tried on multilib and plain 64it with same results) Let $F$ be a field, let $\omega$ be a primitive $n$th root of unity in an algebraic closure of $F$. If $a$ in $F$ is not an $m$th power in $F(\omega)$ for any $m\gt 1$ that divides $n$, how to show that $x^n -a$ is irreducible over $F$? I want to make an animation in time to a song so when I hit play on the timeline I need to be able to hear the song so I can finely tune the animations to start and end at the right time.  Is it possible to have sound play on an animation while it is playing in the 3d viewport before it has been rendered. Does the shape of a containter affect the apparent mass of liquid inside it when measured by a scale? For both containers it is true that:  $p_{bottom}=p_{atm}+\rho gh$ and $F_{bottom}=a*p_{bottom} \iff F_{bottom}=a*p_{atm} + a\rho gh$  I do not know how a scale functions, but I guess that the only force it can count is the force by the liquid on the bottom of each container (the only surface that is in touch with the scale is the bottom of the container). Thus, if we measured the mass of these two masses of water (lets assume that the mass of the containers is negligible) it would appear to be the same in each case. Am I right? Is it possible to detect 32 bit vs 64 bit in a bash script? I am writing a bash script to deal with some installations in an automated way... I have the possibility of getting one such program in 32 or 64 bit binary... is it possible to detect the machine architecture from bash so I can select the correct binary?  This will be for Ubuntu machines. Is there any way to import a .json model into Blender? Using Fermats prime numbers to prove that there is infinitely many prime numbers We are experimenting with running an OpenVPN server for our business. One question I can't seem to find the answer to is this:  When we generate keys for one of our users for them to use at home, can their use the same keys on their home laptop as well as their home desktop? Or do we need to generate separate keys for each user's client machine? Clarify or visualize the parameters involved for receiving the Curious badge