List of figures \hbox overfull I have an overfull \hbox in my list of figures, not because of long captions/page number over run, which is addressed in other postings(addressed in  and , but because the figure number (left hand side of the listing) is too long.  Below is a few lines from the .lof file. It is only the last three figures that generate an error. Figures 4.6.8 and 4.6.9 generate no overfull box but 4.6.10,4.6.11,4.6.12 all do.      \contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.6.8}{\ignorespaces Repeat: Model \&amp; Data: Detail}}{164}{figure.4.6.8}  \contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.6.9}{\ignorespaces High School GPA: Model \&amp; Data}}{165}{figure.4.6.9}  \contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.6.10}{\ignorespaces Math SAT Score: Model \&amp; Data}}{166}{figure.4.6.10}  \contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.6.11}{\ignorespaces Timing: Model \&amp; Data}}{167}{figure.4.6.11}  \contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4.6.12}{\ignorespaces sequencing of Physics 7A Effect by Course}}{168}{figure.4.6.12}   Harish Kumar provided a solution. Much thanks
Fix formatting errors of page number > 99 in table of contents? This is a follow up question of .  The formatting problem has nothing to do with cleanthesis.sty.  The problem is that if I use the charter font, page numbers greater than 99 are not formatted correctly in the table of content.  \documentclass[draft=on]{scrbook} \usepackage{blindtext} \usepackage{charter}  \listfiles  \begin{document} \tableofcontents \section{Section 1} \blindtext[100] \section{Section 2} \blindtext[500] \section{Section 3} \end{document}
Proving that the sequence $F_{n}(x)=\sum\limits_{k=1}^{n} \frac{\sin{kx}}{k}$ is boundedly convergent on $\mathbb{R}$ Here is an exercise, on analysis which i am stuck.    How do I prove that if $F_{n}(x)=\sum\limits_{k=1}^{n} \frac{\sin{kx}}{k}$, then the sequence $\{F_{n}(x)\}$ is boundedly convergent on $\mathbb{R}$? How to extract this format in xslt $_POST empty on utf-8 characters Where's the energy in a boosted capacitor? Suppose I look at a parallel plate capacitor in its rest frame and calculate the electrostatic energy, $E$.  Next, I look at the same capacitor in a primed frame boosted in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the plates. In this frame, the $E$-field is the same strength, there is no magnetic field, and the volume over which the $E$-field extends is less by a factor $1/\gamma$. This suggests $E' = \frac{1}{\gamma} E$, but relativity states that energy transforms as $E' = \gamma E$.   Where is the missing energy? Should I use the past tense with did? For example, I was to say:     The important question is: Did they knew what it means or not?   Or should I say:     The important question is: Did they know what it means or not?   In other words: Should I use past tense with did?  I looked at this:    but it didn't really answer my question. How to keep the spaces at the end and/or at the beginning of a String? Is it appropriate to put a comma before "which"? On Server Fault, we were discussing  in chat. There are non-native speakers in the chat and somehow we got on the topic of grammar and proper use of commas.   The sentence of interest:     I have just got a new Ubuntu LAMP VPS server, which I am trying to configure.   Some people thought that the comma was superfluous. Others did not.   When is it appropriate for a comma to preceed the word which, and is the example sentence above correct?    Also, before you vote to close this question as a dupe of , please consider the differences between the two questions and ignore the similarity of the titles. The OP's example sentence was restructured in that question instead of addressing the proper use of commas. Customize equation numbering for Equation environment? I want to manually label equation number ? For example I want to label this equation 3.1 instead of (1) which automatically pops up. Is it also possible in split environment as well or not ?      \begin{equation}     \log \mu_{ijk}= \lambda + \lambda_i ^I + \lambda_j ^J+\lambda_k ^K+\lambda_{ij} ^{IJ}+\lambda_{ik} ^{IK}+\lambda_{jk} ^{JK}+\lambda_{ijk} ^{IJK} \label{eq:3.1}     \end{equation} Is there some way to get explorer to generate thumbnails without actually having to navigate and scroll through every folder?  All I could get was a command prompt script that would load an explorer window for all subfolders, however only images that were visible would have thumbnails created. How can I make a logo in Adobe Illustrator like the AntiParticle logo below, from ?   It is a large number circles of different, varying sizes, which form the shape of a text character. How do I install the Tor Browser Bundle in Ubuntu? In Ubuntu 13.04 I used to use the ppa:upubuntu-com/tor64  PPA to install the 64-bit Tor Browser Bundle. However, in Ubuntu 13.10 it doesn't work anymore. How do I install the Tor Browser Bundle in Ubuntu? I would like to format a price in JavaScript. I'd like a function which takes a float as an argument and returns a string formatted like this: &quot;$ 2,500.00&quot;  What's the best way to do this? Does the rank-nullity theorem hold for infinite dimensional $V$? TeXstudio does a pretty good job with autocompletion. For example, when I type \eqref{, it already comes with suggestions, see the example below.    However, suppose that I don't want to use \eqref but a customized command using newcommand (I do this so that I can quickly switch to different styles, e.g., some for journals/conferences "Eq. (1)" is needed, whereas sometimes "(1)" suffices). In this case, TeXstudio does not do the auto-completion, see the example below.    Is it possible to configure TeXstudio such that it does the auto-completion for custom commands that require a reference?  Note that one option is to redefine \eqref using \renewcommand, but I'm looking for another way so that I can use if for many more commands, not just for \eqref.   Here is my MWE:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath}  \newcommand{\alternative}[1]{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}  \begin{document}     \begin{equation}         \label{eq:emc2}         E = mc^2     \end{equation}     I can refer to the equation using \eqref{eq:emc2} and using \alternative{eq:emc2}. \end{document} Is there a systematic way of finding the conjugacy class and centralizer of an element? Could the task be simplified if we are working with "special groups" such as $S_n$ or $A_n$? Are there any intuitive approaches? Thanks. My daughter bought a ticket for a flight with a layover in Emirates (from Dallas, Texas to India). She had a stop of 48 hours in Dubai. When she was checking in in Dubai for Delhi, she was informed that her visa for India has expired in 2012. Did Emirates not have an obligation to check the visa for India before selling a ticket? A inequality proposed at Zhautykov Olympiad 2008 An inequality proposed at Zhautykov Olympiad 2008.     Let be $a,b,c &gt;0$ with $abc=1$. Prove that:    $$\sum_{\mathrm{cyc}}{\frac{1}{(a+b)b}} \geq \frac{3}{2}.$$   Set $a=\frac{x}{y}$, $b=\frac{y}{z}$, $c=\frac{z}{x}$.   Our inequality becomes: $$\sum_{\mathrm{cyc}}{\frac{z^2}{zx+y^2}} \geq \frac{3}{2}.$$  Now we use that: $z^2+x^2 \geq 2zx.$ $$\sum_{\mathrm{cyc}}{\frac{z^2}{zx+y^2}} \geq \sum_{\mathrm{cyc}}{\frac{2z^2}{z^2+x^2+2y^2}} \geq \frac{3}{2}.$$  Now applying Cauchy-Schwarz we obtain the desired result.  What I wrote can be found on this link: . But now, I don't know how to apply Cauchy-Schwarz.   Thanks:) Quantum information references LaTeX: optional arguments with square brackets LaTeX is trying to add a missing $ that I don't want to the following code. Minimal working example:  \documentclass[letter,12pt]{article}  \newcommand{\monkeyBeans}[2][]{   \parbox{4in}{#1} }  \begin{document}  \parbox{4in}{$[a, b]$}   \monkeyBeans[$[a, b]$]{yo monkey}  \end{document}   If I try any of the following lines in my document instead of the call to monkeyBeans, there is no error:  \parbox{4in}{$[a, b]$}  \monkeyBeans[yo monkey]{$[a, b]$} \monkeyBeans[$(a, b)$]{yo monkey} \monkeyBeans{$[a, b]$}{yo monkey}   What is the deal with square brackets in optional arguments? This is an exercise in some textbooks.     Let $E$ be an algebraic extension of $F$. Suppose $R$ is ring that contains $F$ and is contained in $E$. Prove that $R$ is a field.   The trouble is really with the inverse of $r$, where $r\in R$. How to prove that $r^{-1}\in R$, in apparent lack of a characterization of $R$.  It occurred to me to use the smallest field containing $R$ ($R$ is easily shown to be an integral domain), that's the field of quotients, and proving that it's $R$ itself, but I don't really know how to proceed.  A not-too-weak, not-too-strong hint will be much appreciated.   Beware $ $ Readers seeking only hints should  beware that there is now a complete answer.