I am trying to make a bed in Blender as part of a personal project but the Silk option is missing under the cloth in the Psychics tab. I have made the surface below have a collision put on it, but I just can't find it! Any help?
Is there anyway to restore the Blender default Cloth settings? Or is there anyway to find what the default settings are?  I didn't realize at the time that by changing the values I was overriding the default values.  Using Blender v2.76.
The set of functions which map convergent series to convergent series Suppose $f$ is some real function with the above property, i.e.  if $\sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {x_n}$ converges, then $\sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {f(x_n)}$ also converges.   My question is: can anything interesting be said regarding the behavior of such a function close to $0$, other than the fact that $f(0)=0$? The following definition is needed for my actual question:  For $A, B \in \mathcal{M}_{n \times n}$ define $$  \langle A, B \rangle = \text{Trace}(B^{T}A) = \sum_{j=1}^{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}b_{ij} \, a_{ij} $$  And here is the actual question:  For $B \in \mathcal{M}_{n \times n}$ show that $$ \text{Trace}(B)^{2} \:\leq\: n \,\text{Trace}(B^{T}B) $$  I know I have to use the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, but I wasn't exactly sure how to.  Here is my attempt:  Since I only have one matrix I decided to use the identity matrix $$ \begin{align} \text{Trace}(B)^{2} \:&amp;\leq\: n \,\text{Trace}(B^{T}B) \\ \text{Trace}(I^{T}B)^{2} \:&amp;\leq\: n \, \langle B, B \rangle \\ \langle I_{n}, B \rangle^{2} \:&amp;\leq\: n \, \Vert B \Vert^{2} \\ \langle I_{n}, B \rangle \:&amp;\leq\: \sqrt{n} \, \Vert B \Vert \end{align} $$  I feel like I either did it incorrect, or that I'm close but am missing something. A thought experiment: Imagine the Sun is suddenly removed. We wouldn't notice a difference for 8 minutes, because that's how long light takes to get from the Sun's surface to Earth.   However, what about the Sun's gravitational effect? If gravity propagates at the speed of light, for 8 minutes the Earth will continue to follow an orbit around nothing. If however, gravity is due to a distortion of spacetime, this distortion will cease to exist as soon as the mass is removed, thus the Earth will leave through the orbit tangent, so we could observe the Sun's disappearance more quickly.  What is the state of the research around such a thought experiment? Can this be inferred from observation? I use  to store all articles I need and bibtex4word add-on (in MS Word) to maintain the reference list. So, I would like to know how to properly fill the "author" field in Jabref with multiple authors to appear them correct in the reference list.  For example, I've got the article with several authors:      E. Orti, J.L. Bredas, C. Clarisse   And I would like them to appear in this manner. But instead I get this:     C. C. E. Orti, J. L. Bredas Is 3+1 spacetime as privileged as is claimed? I've often heard the argument that having 3 spatial dimensions is very special. Such arguments are invariably based on certain assumptions that do not appear to be justifiable at all, at least to me. There is a  on Wikipedia.  For example, a common argument for why >3 dimensions is too many is that the gravitational law cannot result in stable orbital motion. A common argument for &lt;3 dimensions being too few is that one cannot have a gastrointestinal tract, or more generally, a hole that doesn't split an organism into two.  Am I being overly skeptical in thinking that while the force of gravity may not be able to hold objects in stable orbits, there most certainly exist sets of physical laws in higher dimensions which result in formation of stable structures at all scales? It may be utterly different to our universe, but who said a 4D universe must be the same as ours with one extra dimension?  Similarly, isn't it very easy to conceive of a 2D universe in which organisms can feed despite not having any holes, or not falling apart despite having them? For example, being held together by attractive forces, or allowing certain fundamental objects of a universe to interpenetrate, and thus enter a region of the body in which they become utilized. Or, conceive of a universe so incomprehensibly different to ours that feeding is unnecessary, and self-aware structures form through completely different processes.  While I realise that this is sort of a metaphysical question, is 3+1 dimensions really widely acknowledged to be particularly privileged by respected physicists? Better Information On Defense Damage Clash of Clans The way that Clash of Clans chooses to convey information about how much damage defense buildings output is bad. The current method of telling the user that a mortar does X dmg a second is pretty worthless since they fire much slower than once a second.  Where can I find a break down / what is the damage break down for how much damage these buildings do per shot rather than per second?  Sure, information on each level of the buildings would be nice but if that is too much I think simply providing the data for level one of each building would also work. Best practice: card expiry date on checkout GeoJSON does not appear on my Leaflet map I'm a beginner in Leaflet and I need help to deal with GeoJSON files.  I succeeded in creating a Leaflet basemap. I can add markers without troubles but I cannot manage to show a GeoJSON layer.  Here is the code I picked up from Leaflet Tutorials website  :  var geojsonFeature = {     "type": "Feature",     "properties": {         "name": "Coors Field",         "amenity": "Baseball Stadium",         "popupContent": "This is where the Rockies play!"     },     "geometry": {         "type": "Point",         "coordinates": [-104.99404, 39.75621]     } }; L.geoJSON(geojsonFeature).addTo(map);   Unfortunatly, the GeoJSON does not appear in my map.   Can you tell me where I missed something ?    Alright, you're fine Francisco, this part was OK. I changed the whole script and it works !  However, would you know how to load a GeoJSON from an external source ?  I tried this :   var geojsonLayer = new L.GeoJSON.AJAX("foo.geojson");        geojsonLayer.addTo(map);   from   but this definitely does not work.  Any ideas ?    I am not skilled enough to understand your advice.  Here is the whole code I am using to create my map :  &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt; &lt;html&gt; &lt;head&gt; &lt;title&gt;data&lt;/title&gt; &lt;meta charset="UTF-8"&gt; &lt;link rel="stylesheet" href="https://unpkg.com/leaflet@1.0.3/dist/leaflet.css" /&gt; &lt;script src="https://unpkg.com/leaflet@1.0.3/dist/leaflet.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.1.min.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;   &lt;script type="text/javascript" src="http://maps.stamen.com/js/tile.stamen.js?v1.3.0"&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script src="/js/leaflet-0.7.2/leaflet.ajax.min.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script src="htdocs/webmap101/leaflet.ajax.min.js" type="text/javascript" &gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;style&gt;    #map {width: 960px; height:700px;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;/head&gt; &lt;body&gt;   &lt;div id="map"&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;script&gt;   // create map var lat = 44.933331; var lon = 4.9;  var map = L.map('map',{center: [lat,lon],zoom: 6});   // basemaps var base = L.tileLayer('http://{s}.tile.osm.org/{z}/{x}/{y}.png',   {attribution: '© &lt;a href="http://osm.org/copyright"&gt;OpenStreetMap&lt;/a&gt; contributors'  }); var toner = new L.StamenTileLayer("toner"); var watercolor = new L.StamenTileLayer("watercolor"); var landscape = L.tileLayer('https://tile.thunderforest.com/landscape/{z}/{x}/{y}.png'); base.addTo(map);   // markers  var mark1=L.marker([lat,lon]) mark1.addTo(map)    // layers panel  L.control.layers({"base": base, "water": watercolor, "toner": toner , "landscape" : landscape}).addTo(map);    // geojson files var geojsonFeature = {     "type": "Feature",     "properties": {         "name": "Coors Field",         "amenity": "Baseball Stadium",         "popupContent": "This is where the Rockies play!"     },     "geometry": {         "type": "Point",         "coordinates": [-104.99404, 39.75621]     } }; L.geoJSON(geojsonFeature).addTo(map);    //ajax  var geojsonLayer = new L.GeoJSON.AJAX("foo.geojson");        geojsonLayer.addTo(map);  &lt;/script&gt; &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt;   I know it's a bit messy but this is actually my very first HTML script... I guess I did not include in a proper way the AJAX library.    Actually, I just want a solution to replace the lines where I create the GeoJSON by something that tells javascript to load the GeoJSON stored locally in my folder. This :  var geojsonFeature = {     "type": "Feature",     "properties": {         "name": "Coors Field",         "amenity": "Baseball Stadium",         "popupContent": "This is where the Rockies play!"     },     "geometry": {         "type": "Point",         "coordinates": [-104.99404, 39.75621]     } };   should be transformed into something like (I don't know if it exists) :  var geojsonFeature = [foo.geosjon]   where "foo.geosjson" is a file like :  { "type": "FeatureCollection", "name": "abies", "crs": { "type": "name", "properties": { "name": "urn:ogc:def:crs:OGC:1.3:CRS84" } }, "features": [ { "type": "Feature" virtualbox crash on kernel 4.13.0-26 Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Virtualbox 5.0.40 ubuntu r 115130  Today after upgrading to kernel 4.13.0-26 guest vbox machines started to crash whole ubuntu. just hard poweroff is working.  If I startup with kernel 4.10.0-42 everything works fine.  what may be the problem ? “It can be very cold…” vs “It may be very cold…” It can be very cold in winters.   It may be very cold in winters.   What is the difference between these two sentences?  People say when may is used then it means that it may be cold in winters or it may not be cold in winters. In other words, may means 'not sure'.  So does that mean if can is used then it is 100% sure that it will be cold in winters? How can an object's instantaneous speed be zero and it's instantaneous acceleration be nonzero? I'm studying for my upcoming physics course and ran across this concept - I'd love an explanation. Auto reply to text and/or iMessage? Is it possible to set up an auto-reply to an incoming text or iMessage, either on my iPhone (or the connected Message app on my Mac)?  Ideally I'd like to customize this depending upon the sender. Should the personal/research statement be technical? Related:   I know I must describe my past and current research in my personal/research statement or statement of purpose. But do I use technical terms?  I was given the advice that since the people reading my statement are mathematicians (I am applying to US for applied mathematics), they should know what I am talking about.  Although I am applying to applied mathematics, it would also be nice to hear from other fields (biology, computer science, engineering etc) about this. "...his parents' dream of *him* achieving a Cambridge degree." What is the function of "him" here? I'd wish to visit Dubai with my girlfriend, but after reading  and  I started to get a little worried about it. How should I book an hotel? Must I book two singles? Could it be a problem if we walk together in the city and go together to restaurants and malls without being married? I'm considering re-designing my personal website to promote my web services in my local area.  My issue is whether to do a one page website with a scroll-to navigation system. What effect does this have on SEO. As i understand it, you set stuff like h1's and meta description on specific page content. How does this work when all of your different content is on one page? At the very end of Deathly Hallows, after Harry repaired his own wand with the Elder Wand, he tells Dumbledore's Portrait in the office:     “I’m putting the Elder Wand,” he told Dumbledore, who was watching him with    enormous affection and admiration, “back where it came from. It can stay there. If I die a    natural death like Ignotus, its power will be broken, won’t it? The previous master will    never have been defeated. That’ll be the end of it.   Now, this seems incredibly foolish to me.  "The previous master will never have been defeated" would only have been assuredely true if Harry had died right after depositing the Elder Wand back into Dumbledore's Tomb.   If not, Harry (the Wand owner) would still be alive, and at the risk of being Disarmed (as was shown with Harry and Draco Malfoy, it doesn't matter if the Elder Wand's owner is defeated by death or simple disarming, AND it's not even required that the Disarming would involve the Elder Wand!).  So, if Harry merely put the Elder Wand back into the Tomb, and some years later, someone would disarm him (or, even worse, kill him) - then that someone would become the Elder Wand owner, either by accident or by design:    By accident - Harry is likely to get into plenty of magical duels in the future. Even discounting friendly one (teaching people the Expelliramus), he plans on becoming an Auror!  By design - plenty of people have been in the Great Hall hearing Harry explaining to Voldemort that he, Harry, was now the owner of the Elder Wand, so the fact of his ownership would most assuredly NOT remain a secret, inviting countless people tempted by owning the Deathstick to hunt Harry down. Oh, and the location is now also known!   So "its power will be broken" is quite unlikely to come true!  Is Harry hopelessly wrong? Or am I missing something in the above logic? Was this addressed in canon/JKR info? How to get the file name and a line number of a function call? Work done against gravity The work done against gravity is $mgh$, well at least that's what my textbook says. I have a question: I can apply a force say 50N, so total work done = $mgh + mah$. Where $ma$ = Force. But the truth is irrespective of the force applied, the work done against gravity is always $mgh$. Why?  For example, when I move an object with a force, the work done is more, so work depends on the Force. But in case of gravity it always depends upon the weight I asked  that turned out to have multiple correct answers. How do I pick between them to determine which to accept?  All of the answers were different. They were not the same answer given multiple times.