I have a question related to this one:   Since the rules don't specify how you calculate your DC for this ability, could a multiclass Sorcerer/Cleric use their Charisma instead of their Wisdom modifier?
clerics have the ability  (PHB, p. 62):     When a creature within 5 feet of you that you can see hits you with an attack, you can use your reaction to cause the creature to make a Dexterity saving throw. The creature takes 2d8 lightning or thunder damage (your choice) on a failed saving throw, and half as much damage on a successful one.   It doesn't specify what the DC of the saving throw is.   I assume it uses the spell save DC, even though it technically isn't a spell?     Spell save DC = 8 + your proficiency bonus + your Wisdom modifier
Pivot in SQL 2008 R2 Uncertainty in parenthesis No association bonus for Area51? My Area51 account crossed 200 rep today, but still other accounts don't reflect the change in reputation. When will the changes be applied? or is there no association bonus for Area51 account? The generic off-topic flag reason has different wording in the Android app \nameref breaks for the star versions of section, paragraph when titlesec is loaded. I have a document that numbers paragraphs by default, but I have a few I do not want to number but would like to refer to. These are marked with \paragraph*, however, if the titlesec package is loaded at the same time, it causes nameref to display an empty string (the link box of hyperref is still visible).  MWE:  \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[sf]{titlesec} %comment this out and it works fine. \usepackage{hyperref} \begin{document} \section{Sections} \label{sec} This is \nameref{sec} \paragraph{A named Paragraph} \label{par} This is \nameref{par} \paragraph*{A starred named Paragraph} \label{par:star} This is \nameref{par:star} \end{document}   I suspect titlesec causes this defect for ALL star variants of sectioning commands but have not tested this. For me only paragraph* is relevant however a fix for all variants would be the best.  I have a hunch it might be related to this:  however this happens to go way beyond my latex knowledge and is just "magic" for me. I'm quite confused about attacking with two weapons in both hands and wondering what is required to be able to do to (in Pathfinder).  1. Base Attack Bonus Looking at the base attack bonus tables for different classes (e.g. the ) it seems like up to +5 you get only one attack per full action but starting from base-attack-bonus of +6 you get a second attack with +1.  2. Feats There is a feat . The existence of the feat sounds like you could not do two-weapon-fighting without it. However, in the description of "normal" it says:     If you wield a second weapon in your off hand, you can get one extra attack per round with that weapon. When fighting in this way you suffer a –6 penalty with your regular attack or attacks with your primary hand and a –10 penalty to the attack with your off hand. If your off-hand weapon is light, the penalties are reduced by 2 each.   3. Core Rulebook Chapter about combat If I understand the  it says that you need a full-round action do attack with both weapons in two hands.  So how do these things interact? Can I only attack with my off-hand weapon if my base-attack-bonus is high enough that I get second one with +1?  If not, how does the "multiple attacks from high base-attack-bonus" interact with dual-wielding? Assuming I reached a state of base-attack-bonus with +11/+6/+1 and have a full-round action to attack. Does that mean I can either attack with my primary weapon three times or use the primary weapon and off-hand weapon to attack only twice? Why would I then ever choose dual-wielding? Or can I attack three times with both weapons (leading to a total of 6 attacks with heavy malus) Or would I get 3 attacks with the primary weapon + 1 attack with the off-hand weapon? If so, what attack bonus do I have to use for each of the attacks? Subequation: Counter too large How do you reindex an array in PHP but with indexes starting from 1? Roman numerals become “too wide” in table of contents Following minimal document:  \documentclass{report}  \begin{document} \renewcommand*\thechapter{\Roman{chapter}} \tableofcontents \setcounter{chapter}{6} % Problem starts at chapter 7 \chapter{Seven} \chapter{Eight} \section{Eight-one} \section{Eight-two} \end{document}   yields this output (cut to size for your convenience):    Clearly, the chapter (and section) headings hang into the chapter (section) numbers. For the previous chapter numbers, this isn’t a problem since all chapter titles are aligned to the same column and the numbers I–VI are sufficiently narrow.  (The same happens regardless of document type, I’m actually using scrreprt with the same result.)  How can I prevent this? I know only the very basics of TikZ, having only used it to produce a pretty flow chart for one of my documents. I recently learned that you can use Inkscape and export to TikZ.  What are the limitations of the Inkscape->TikZ workflow? Is there some compelling reason to take the time to learn TikZ (which I'm told has a fairly steep learning curve) rather than simply exporting to TikZ from Inkscape? What is a smart pointer and when should I use one? What is a smart pointer and when should I use one? I want to remove all the files from different directories, and want to keep only latest files 20 files. is this the correct command to do this?  ls -t1 /mnt/dwh/ftp/dwh_ftp_cbs/ARLOGS/ | tail -n +22 | xargs rm -f Deep cloning objects how to get output of a script/program into a file? Using "that" and "this" interchangeably Learning and using English I'm always confused about what word to use for referring to things that have been described by me a few sentences earlier: "that" or "this".   Confusion comes from the fact that only the equivalent of "this" is always used in my native language for such referring. But I've noticed that in English for such referring "that" is used as often as "this" (or maybe even more often).  Some examples for illustrating (just tried to google something appropriate to convey my idea better):     We assess local... the demographics of the local population. What are the natural traffic drivers in the area. Things like cinemas and pubs and retail and office and all that type of things and we now put together a bit of a matrix and actually give a weighted score to each of the things we know help our business. That helps us decide in a more scientific fashion.   or:     The problem of Cervantes' origin became after that into a tough matter. Some experts believed that the Cervantes from Alcázar, in the times of the Lepanto Battle, was in the age of a child, more concerned about gathering nests and that type of things than about fighting as a soldier.   and for "this":     I believe lot of people who involved fishery industries in Mexico Gulf are suffering now but as for economic issues, U.S government and other countries will support them and give an utmost response to it. Important thing is that we learn from this mistake and make sure this type of things will never happen in the future and protect nature environment thus we have to take this technology to get energy from water very seriously. I really hope this technology will be available and used for everybody as soon as possible.   Is there a rule describing proper usage of these words in cases like this? (or should I have written "..in cases like that"?) Today, after returning from vacations, I started my QGIS 1.7 and got this terrible message:    Help, anyone? How to render an animation as video in Blender? Yesterday I was working on a simple animation, an animated logo.   Here is an image of the progress:    I already have the animation working and everything is okay with the project, but I can't figure out how I can render the animation and turn it into an AVI format video.  How do I render an animation in Blender? product distribution of two uniform distribution, what about 3 or more How do I iterate over a range of numbers in Bash when the range is given by a variable?  I know I can do this (called "sequence expression" in the Bash ):   for i in {1..5}; do echo $i; done   Which gives:     1    2    3    4    5   Yet, how can I replace either of the range endpoints with a variable? This doesn't work:  END=5 for i in {1..$END}; do echo $i; done   Which prints:     {1..5} What is causing different spacing between a header and content on one page only? I have found that for only one page (so far) the spacing between the header and content is different from the spacing on all the other pages. You can see this behavior in the images below (from pages 2 and 3 of the document):     My .tex file contents are shown below.  \documentclass[a4paper]{report} \usepackage{fullpage} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \pagestyle{fancy} \setlength{\headsep}{0.5cm}  \begin{document} \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.4pt} \renewcommand{\chaptermark}[1]{\markboth{\thechapter. #1}{}} \fancyhead[L]{\bfseries \leftmark} \fancyhead[R]{\bfseries \rightmark}  \chapter{Version Control} \lipsum \lipsum \lipsum \lipsum  \end{document}