I have  that is 2 months old. In the first few weeks, it was getting indexed nicely and my GoogleWebmaster reports were showing that it was getting crawled and began ranking for some terms.  Then as I kept writing, the GoogleWebmaster report thinned out and showed less and less terms that this blog ranks for. Now there are only 4 terms with one of them being my name.  Is there something I need to do to keep the old posts to remain indexed and crawled?  Thanks, Alex
It's been sometime and Google has yet to index my site. How can I get Google to index my website?
I recently tried to use QGIS and I wondered if you can convert a draft ArcGIS map (*.mxd file) into a QGIS project (*.qgs file).   This would avoid thematize the entire project. How do you show that $e^{-1/x^2}$ is differentiable at $0$? Define the real valued function $f(x)$ by $f(x) = e^{-1/x^2}$ if $x \ne 0$ and $0$ if $x = 0$.    How do you show that $e^{-1/x^2}$ is differentiable at $0$? How do you show that this function is infinitely differentiable? Package incompatibilites: etoolbox, hyperref, and bm, standalone? I am trying to transition to using the etoolbox package, but seem to have run into some difficulties and they appear related to the hyperref and bm packages which to me seem totally unrelated.  The MWE example compiles since \RemoveEToolbox is defined and shows that there is no apparent problem before etoolbox was used.    Commenting out the \def\RemoveEToolbox{} line produces two problems:   With both the \renewcommand, and the usepackage{hyperref} commented, this results in "Runaway argument? Paragraph ended before \bm@test@token was complete". Including the usepackage{hyperref} (with \renewcommand commented) results in "Undefined control  sequence. \Call@AtVeryEndDocument ...cumentHook \@undefined"   But if uncomment the \renewcommand{\bm}{#1} line (effectively doing without any \bm), then this seems to compile.  I have been using this for a while now and things appeared to have been working fine, but now that I attempt to use etoolbox I seem to run into problems.  \documentclass{standalone} \def\RemoveEToolbox{}% Shows that this works fine without {etoolbox}  \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage{bm}  \ifdefined\RemoveEToolbox     \newcommand*{\iftoggle}[3]{#2}% Default to true value of "if" \else     \usepackage{etoolbox}     \newtoggle{paper}     \toggletrue{paper}      %\renewcommand{\bm}[1]{#1}% Why can't I have a normal \bm with {etoolbox}? \fi  % \usepackage{hyperref}  \begin{document}  This document is intended for  \iftoggle{paper}{paper}{electronic} distribution.  \bm{\textcolor{blue}{Solve $x^2-1=0$}}  \begin{align*}     a &amp;= b\\     \iftoggle{paper}{         c &amp;= d\\     }{}     e &amp;= f\\ \end{align*} \end{document} Okay, so I understand what calculus, linear algebra, combinatorics and even topology try to answer (update: this is not the case in hindsight), but why invent category theory? In Wikipedia it says it is to formalize. As far as I can tell, it sort of generalizes a bunch of fields in mathematics, like in topology, graphs and groups we have isomorphisms and automorphisms and homomorphisms, it seems to me like it just finds a bunch of results that are true to these functions in a bunch of disciplines. But why would generalizing that be of use? I mean, wouldn't it be easier to prove them specifically in each of the important disciplines? How to move a database from SQL Server 2012 to SQL Server 2005 Characterize the groups $G$ for which the map $\iota: G \to G$, sending $x \mapsto x^{-1}$ for all $x \in G$, is an automorphism of $G$ I have trouble on this question: "Characterize the groups G for which the map $$\iota: G \to G$$ sending $$x \mapsto x^{-1}$$ for all $x \in G$, is an automorphism of $G$." From  post I have seen that $G$ must be abelian. Can anyone propose another characteristic of $G$ that I can derive from the given conditions besides abelian? Thank you so much!! Edit:  Of course my real code doesn't look exactly like this. I tried to write semi-pseudo code to make it more clear of whay I wanted to do.  Looks like it just messed things up instead.  So, what I actually would like to do is this:  Method&lt;Interface1&gt;(); Method&lt;Interface2&gt;(); Method&lt;Interface3&gt;(); ...   Well ... I thought that maybe I could turn it into a loop using reflection. So the question is: How how do I do it. I have very shallow knowledge of reflection. So code examples would be great.  The scenario looks like this:  public void Method&lt;T&gt;() where T : class {} public void AnotherMethod() {     Assembly assembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();      var interfaces = from i in assembly.GetTypes()     where i.Namespace == "MyNamespace.Interface" // only interfaces stored here     select i;      foreach(var i in interfaces)     {         Method&lt;i&gt;(); // Get compile error here!     }       Original post:  Hi!  I'm trying to loop through all interfaces in a namespace and send them as arguments to a generic method like this:  public void Method&lt;T&gt;() where T : class {} public void AnotherMethod() {     Assembly assembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();      var interfaces = from i in assembly.GetTypes()     where i.Namespace == "MyNamespace.Interface" // only interfaces stored here     select i;      foreach(var interface in interfaces)     {         Method&lt;interface&gt;(); // Get compile error here!     } }   The error I get is "Type name expected, but local variable name found". If I try  ...     foreach(var interface in interfaces)     {         Method&lt;interface.MakeGenericType()&gt;(); // Still get compile error here!     } }   I get "Cannot apply operator '&lt;' to operands of type 'method group' and 'System.Type'" Any idea on how to get around this problem? Is there a command to show the directory/file name when cat files?  For example: assume two files f1.txt and f2.txt are under ./tmp  ./tmp/f1.txt ./tmp/f2.txt    Then when I do cat ./tmp/*.txt, only the content of files will be shown. But how to firstly show the file name, then the content?, e.g.:   (The needed command):  ./tmp/f1.txt:    This is from f1.txt  and so on  ./tmp/f1.txt:  This is from f2.txt ...   Is there a command to do it? (There seems to be no option for 'cat' to show the file names) Getting "Not found" message when running a 32-bit binary on a 64-bit system I have currently a strange problem on debian (wheezy/amd64).  I have created a chroot to install a server (i can't give any more detail about it, sorry). Let's call its path /chr_path/. To make things easy, I have initialized this chroot with a debootstrap (also wheezy/amd64).  All seemed to work well inside the chroot but when I started the installer script of my server I got : zsh: Not found /some_path/perl (the installer includes a perl binary for some reasons)  Naturally, I checked the /some_path/ location and I found the "perl" binary. file in chroot environment returns :  /some_path/perl ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, not stripped   The file exists, seems ok, has correct rights. I can use file, ls, vim on it but as soon as I try to execute it - ./perl for example - I get : zsh: Not found ./perl.  This situation is quite understandable for me. Moreover :   I can execute other basic binaries (/bin/ls,...) in the chroot without getting errors I have the same problems for other binaries that came with the project When I try to execute the binary from the main root (/chr_path/some_path/perl), it works. I have tried to put one of the binaries with a copy of my ls. I checked that the access rights were the same but this didn't change anything (one was working, and the other wasn't) Android app chokes on per-site meta profiles Steps to reproduce:    Go to a per-site meta. Find any post. Touch the user that posted it. See something like this (click to enlarge):           As you can see, it says "Stack Overflow" as the site, and shows my SO rep and badges, but it shows my Meta.Code Golf posts. Multiple submit buttons in an HTML form Let's say you create a wizard in an HTML form. One button goes back, and one goes forward. Since the back button appears first in the markup when you press Enter, it will use that button to submit the form.  Example:    &lt;form&gt;   &lt;!-- Put your cursor in this field and press Enter --&gt;   &lt;input type="text" name="field1" /&gt;    &lt;!-- This is the button that will submit --&gt;   &lt;input type="submit" name="prev" value="Previous Page" /&gt;    &lt;!-- But this is the button that I WANT to submit --&gt;   &lt;input type="submit" name="next" value="Next Page" /&gt; &lt;/form&gt;     I would like to get to decide which button is used to submit the form when a user presses Enter. That way, when you press Enter the wizard will move to the next page, not the previous. Do you have to use tabindex to do this? Get text from pressed button Find & Delete duplicated files on multiple harddisks at once style=apa causes bibliography to fail How can I connect a texture node to a material with Python? When I try to set the default combo for switching to different language layouts in my keyboard from Shift+Super+Space to Alt+Shift I can't.  I used to have this combo since Ubuntu 14 and even before that when I used to have Windows. Now for some stupid reason it does not allow (actually nothing happens its not like I get an error or the combo is used elsewhere). How could I bypass this bug? are used by the Empire in a manner that is tactically identical to how a modern day army would use a tank, in that they are used as shock armour with powerful main guns which will punch through entrenched positions. (No combined arms tactics were used in the Battle of Hoth, but that's a different question altogether)  However, AT-AT walkers have a number of (rather lethal) drawbacks and no advantages that I can see compared to tanks.    They have footpads in place of treads, which greatly increase their ground pressure, and which will cause them to easily sink as compared to treads They have a high center of gravity and can be easily tripped, which was exploited in the Battle of Hoth. (granted that this was canonically presented as an oversight, albeit a rather stupid one, since most martial arts strongly emphasise lowering your CG.) They are slower than a modern main battle tank despite their long legs, which one would normally expect to grant additional mobility (max speed 60km/h on flat terrain, compared to 72km/h on flat terrain for the ). This is exacerbated by the fact that AT-AT walkers are using fusion power cells as compared to diesel engines.   It would seem that it would make far more sense for the Empire to remove the legs and mount the main chassis on treads, which would make the vehicle far more effective. Why then, did they not do this? It clearly was not the case that imperial Engineers lacked imagination, as they did produce .   Possible answers which I find implausible as advantages:  1: AT-AT walkers are tall, and therefore have a surveying advantage over the battlefield / have a better vantage point to fire from  Orbital satellites can provide the observation, and in any case air/orbital support should always be called in, especially if fire support from above is required. How to transit through Delhi without a visa? If Newton's third law is true, why can we sink in sand? Newton's third law of motion states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. That is the reason we do not sink into the earth, because when our weight exerts a force on the earth it also exerts an equal and opposite force on us.  But when we stand on quicksand or on fluids we can sink in. How is this possible? Does it not exert an equal and opposite force on us? Or are Newton's laws different in the case of fluids and substances of low densities? Let $S$ and $W$ be subsets of a vector space $V$. Show that if $S$ is a subset of $W$, then $\mathrm{span}(S)$ is a subspace of $\mathrm{span}(W)$ Let $S$ and $W$ be subsets of a vector space $V$. Show that if $S$ is a subset of $W$, then $\mathrm{span}(S)$ is a subspace of $\mathrm{span}(W)$.  Ok I'm finally understanding what each of these things mean.. but I'm running out of ideas on how to actually show it without using arbitrary vector space examples like Rn. Since sets and subspaces are kind of new its hard to figure out how to write correct proofs with them.   I can see how if $V = \mathbb{R}^3$ and $S = \{(1,1,1)\}$ and $W = \{(1,1,1), (1,1,2)\}$ then $\mathrm{span}(S) = R1(line), span(W) = R2(plane)$ and that R1 is a subspace of R2... im just having trouble showing this officially when all vector spaces and sets are completely in general....  I could get as far as writing out $S=(u_1,u_2,\dots,u_n)$, $u_i \in V$ and same with $W$, but I can't really figure out what else to do in this sort of proof.