Police want to catch me after I accidentally fired a weapon in public. Now, if I meet a police guy standing around he wants to bust me and one blue star appears by the minimap. How do I end the chase?
I engaged with some enemy NPCs, and accidentally shot a civilian in the head (though not sure it would've mattered if I hit them somewhere else or not) as they ran across my screen. As a result of this, I was alerted by the game that the NCPD (the police) were automatically en route to 'investigate', and that I could avoid them by leaving the area and &quot;lying low for a while&quot;. How long does it take for the police to stop searching for me, and is there any kind of visual information on the HUD that alerts me to when NCPD is or is no longer looking for me?
Active Directory: Is it required that the "A" record for a domain point to a Domain Controller? display only 3 foreach result per row How can I prove that $2017 \mid 1^{2017}+2^{2017}+\dots+2017^{2017}$? I tried proving it with the use of modulo, however it was to no avail. Afterwards, I  tried researching, for possible theorems, that may help, but that bore no fruit, either. Can you guys please help me proving it, as I am stuck? Thanking you in advance. Sound of a next scene starts one moment earlier than video I saw this several times in different movies, but I don't understand what is this supposed to mean. The main idea is when the scene is about to change, for one second or so we still see the picture from the old scene, but the sound is already coming from from the upcoming scene. Why do they do this? What's the purpose of this technique? Are $(x^3)^{1/3} $ and $\sqrt{x^2}$ monomials?    In mathematics, a  is, roughly speaking, a polynomial which has only one term. Two different definitions of a monomial may be encountered:  For the first definition, a monomial, also called power product, is a product of powers of variables with nonnegative integer exponents, or, in other words, a product of variables, possibly with repetitions.   For the second definition, a monomial is a monomial in the first sense multiplied by a nonzero constant, called the coefficient of the monomial. Since I upgraded to Windows 10, my system has been consuming RAM excessively    I've been reading a bit and determined it's likely a driver leaking memory. So I got myself the Windows Driver Kit and tracked memory usage with poolmon:    However, I don't really know how to proceed from here. Is the item tagged "smNp" the culprit in this issue? How do I go from there to actually identifying the driver?  I tried some stuff like "C:\Windows\System32\drivers>findstr /s smnp ." but it returned no results. I also took a look at the pooltag.txt file and this is the description I found for it:      So yeah, any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. If one uses Shadow Evocation on a willing ally (e.g. Telekinetic Charge) can they choose not to disbelieve? Shadow Evocation  Nondamaging effects have normal effects except against those who disbelieve them. Against disbelievers, they have no effect.  Disbelief  Creatures encountering an illusion usually do not receive saving throws to recognize it as illusory until they study it carefully or interact with it in some fashion. A successful saving throw against an illusion reveals it to be false, but a figment or phantasm remains as a translucent outline. A failed saving throw indicates that a character fails to notice something is amiss. A character faced with proof that an illusion isn't real needs no saving throw. If any viewer successfully disbelieves an illusion and communicates this fact to others, each such viewer gains a saving throw with a +4 bonus.  (my emphasis) Voluntarily Giving up a Saving Throw  A creature can voluntarily forego a saving throw and willingly accept a spell's result. Even a character with a special resistance to magic can suppress this quality.  If I understand the above correctly,  If the ally believes the caster actually cast Telekinetic Charge, it seems they get a save which they could forgoe and so be guaranteed the benefit of the spell. &gt;&gt; We're good here. If the ally knows the caster didn't cast Telekinetic Charge, (say because of a high Spellcraft check or because she knows the caster's spell list) they have proof that the illusion isn't real and so need no saving throw. &gt;&gt; Even though she &quot;needs no saving throw&quot;, can she still choose to forego the save and be effected by the spell?  In other words, I think the question boils down to: Does one always have a choice not disbelieve an illusion, even when one has proof that it's not real? Number of possible combinations of x numbers that sum to y I want to find out the number of possible combinations of $x$ numbers that sum to $y$. For example, I want to calculate all combination of 5 numbers, which their sum equals to 10.  An asymptotic approixmation is also useful. This question seems to be very close to number partitioning, with the difference that a number can be 0. See:    All possible partitions for sum 10 and 3 positions that can be zero, are 63 possiblities: (numbers shown as 3 digits)  019 028 037 046 055 064 073 082 091 109 118 127 136 145 154 163 172 181 190 208 217 226 235 244 253 262 271 280 307 316 325 334 343 352 361 370 406 415 424 433 442 451 460 505 514 523 532 541 550 604 613 622 631 640 703 712 721 730 802 811 820 901 910 I'm trying to do something like the following:  enum E;  void Foo(E e);  enum E {A, B, C};   which the compiler rejects.  I've had a quick look on Google and the consensus seems to be "you can't do it", but I can't understand why.  Can anyone explain?  Clarification 2: I'm doing this as I have private methods in a class that take said enum, and I do not want the enum's values exposed - so, for example, I do not want anyone to know that E is defined as  enum E {     FUNCTIONALITY_NORMAL, FUNCTIONALITY_RESTRICTED, FUNCTIONALITY_FOR_PROJECT_X }   as project X is not something I want my users to know about.  So, I wanted to forward declare the enum so I could put the private methods in the header file, declare the enum internally in the cpp, and distribute the built library file and header to people.  As for the compiler - it's GCC. For which complex $a,\,b,\,c$ does $(a^b)^c=a^{bc}$ hold? using a class defined in a c++ dll in c# code I have a dll that was written in c++, I need to use this dll in my c# code. After searching I found that using P/Invoke would give me access to the function I need, but these functions are defined with in a class and use non-static private member variables. So I need to be able to create an instance of this class to properly use the functions. How can I gain access to this class so that I can create an instance? I have been unable to find a way to do this.   I guess I should note that the c++ dll is not my code. I wrote a simple backup script which back ups my stuff on a remote server, everything is working great but I'd like to have some sort of report like "backup successful or not".  this is my script   # backup CHECK date1=`date +"%d.%m.%y - %H.%M"` host=`hostname` twdate=`date +"%d.%m"` performtw=`ls -la|grep "tw"|grep "$twdate" &gt; tmp1.txt` echo $performtw if cat tmp1.txt|grep "tw" then echo backup successfull printf "tw backup success!" | mail -s "tw backup check $date1 repor$ rm tmp1.txt else echo backup failure printf "sitename backup failure!" | mail -s "site backup check $date1 repor$ rm tmp1.txt fi exit   But this isn't working really well and I ask you if there's some simpler and more powerful way to do it? Basically it just needs to check if file exists with the name starting xyz and was created at date xyz. What's an atomic superstate/, and how is it possible?  I understand the basics - being something can be moving and staying still at the same time; the observer changes the behaviour - but I'd like to know a little more, as it interests me, and how is it possible without actually interfering with said thing? I'm hoping someone can help me as this is driving me nuts! Context and Chronological info I'm trying to find the title/author of a short story that I read in some or other anthology ages ago. I couldn't give you an exact date but I'd say it was probably 50s/60s. Plot The human population has increased to the point where input and output of resources on Earth is in exact equilibrium. As such, no other living matter can be permitted to exist, as its use of resources would throw this equilibrium out of balance. One man in a vast tower block has managed to hide some flowers, and, I think, one or a few small animals - perhaps a mouse. These are detected by the relevant authorities, and the story ends when an official arrives at the apartment and requires the man to destroy them - the last non-human living things on Earth. In thinking about Sturm-Liouville theory a bit I see I have no actual idea what is going on.  The first issue I have is that my book began with the statement that given  $$L[y] = a(x)y'' + b(x)y' + c(x)y = f(x)$$  the problem $L[y] \ = \ f$ can be re-cast in the form $L[y] \ = \ \lambda y$.  Now it could be a typo on their part but I see no justification for the way you can just do that!  More importantly though is the motivation for Sturm-Liouville theory in the first place. The story as I know it is as follows:  Given a linear second order ode   $$F(x,y,y',y'') = L[y] = a(x)y'' + b(x)y' + c(x)y = f(x)$$  it is an exact equation if it is derivable from a differential equation of one order lower, i.e.  $$F(x,y,y',y'') = \frac{d}{dx}g(x,y,y').$$  The equation is exact iff  $$a''(x) - b'(x) + c(x) = 0. $$  If $F$ is not exact it can be made exact on multiplication by a suitable integrating factor $\alpha(x)$.  This equation is exact iff  $$(\alpha(x)a(x))'' - (\alpha(x)b(x))' + \alpha(x)c(x) = 0 $$  If you expand this out you get the Adjoint operator  $$L^*[\alpha(x)] \ = \ (\alpha(x)a(x))'' \ - \ (\alpha(x)b(x))' \ + \ \alpha(x)c(x) \ = 0 $$  If you expand $L^*$ you see that we can satisfy $L \ = \ L^*$ if $a'(x) \ = \ b(x)$ &amp; $a''(x) \ = \ b'(x)$ which then turns $L[y]$ into something of the form  $$L[y] \ = \ \frac{d}{dx}[a(x)y'] \ + \ c(x)y \ = \ f(x).$$  Thus we seek an integratiing factor $\alpha(x)$ so that we can satisfy this &amp; the condition this will hold is that $\alpha(x) \ = \ \frac{1}{a(x)}e^{\int\frac{b(x)}{a(x)}dx}$  Then we're dealing with:  $$\frac{d}{dx}[\alpha(x)a(x)y'] \ + \ \alpha(x)c(x)y \ = \ \alpha(x)f(x)$$  But again, by what my book said they magically re-cast this problem as  $$\frac{d}{dx}[\alpha(x)a(x)y'] \ + \ \alpha(x)c(x)y \ = \ \lambda \alpha(x) y(x)$$  Then calling  $$\frac{d}{dx}[\alpha(x)a(x)y'] \ + \ ( \alpha(x)c(x)y \ - \ \lambda \alpha(x) )y(x) \ = \ 0$$  a Sturm-Liouville problem.  My question is, how can I make sense of everything I wrote above? How can I clean it up &amp; interpret it, like at one stage I thought we were turning our 2nd order ode into something so that it reduces to the derivative of a first order ode so we can easily find first integrals then the next moment we're pulling out eigenvalues &amp; finding full solutions - what's going on? I want to be able to look at $a(x)y'' \ + \ b(x)y' \ + \ c(x)y \ = \ f(x)$ &amp; know how &amp; why we're turning this into a Sturm-Liouville problem in a way that makes sense of exactness &amp; integrating factors, thanks for reading! What Wording Did Witches and Wizards in Other Cultures Use for Spells? The spells that we know about in the Harry Potter world all seem to be either in Latin, derived from Latin, or resembling Latin.  This makes sense for the European World, but there were likely witches and wizards in Africa, Asia, and the Americas.  These cultures would have developed independently, and the magical people in them would likely have still found ways to cast their spells.  Do cultures with languages that did not derive from Latin use the same words and phrases that are related to Latin for their spells?  Or did they have other phrases based on the languages in their cultures? I currently trying to join two rigged (and animated) models, which both has separate meshes, separate bones and separate animations. The first mesh is the horse while the second mesh is human:   So I am interested to join human model onto horse model to make a rider:   I think the best way would be to make horse as a parent and human as a child during the join process. In that case I would like that all horse animations (there are 3 of them - idle, walk and run) would remain as they are, while I can lose human animations, as I will need different ones for it. I was also thinking to make human root bone as a child of one horse back bones, that when horse moves up and down it would move entire human mesh together. It would be also good to keep the same weights that human bones would not start deforming horse mesh and vice versa.  I tried to use Ctrl+J by selecting various combinations between bones and meshes in object mode, however, I noticed that it messes up scaling and rotation of the child object. So I was wondering how it would be possible to properly join these models to create a rider? How to interpret this yum dependency error? I'm trying to install XRDP and I'm hitting the following:  [root@box ~]# yum -y install xrdp Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile  * base: centos.serverspace.co.uk  * epel: mirrors.coreix.net  * extras: mirror.sov.uk.goscomb.net  * updates: mirror.sov.uk.goscomb.net Resolving Dependencies --&gt; Running transaction check ---&gt; Package xrdp.x86_64 1:0.9.10-1.el7 will be installed --&gt; Processing Dependency: xrdp-selinux = 1:0.9.10-1.el7 for package: 1:xrdp-0.9.10-1.el7.x86_64 --&gt; Processing Dependency: xorgxrdp for package: 1:xrdp-0.9.10-1.el7.x86_64 --&gt; Running transaction check ---&gt; Package xorgxrdp.x86_64 0:0.2.10-4.el7 will be installed --&gt; Processing Dependency: xorg-x11-server-Xorg(x86-64) = 1.20.4 for package: xorgxrdp-0.2.10-4.el7.x86_64 ---&gt; Package xrdp-selinux.x86_64 1:0.9.10-1.el7 will be installed --&gt; Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: xorgxrdp-0.2.10-4.el7.x86_64 (epel)            Requires: xorg-x11-server-Xorg(x86-64) = 1.20.4            Installed: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.6.el7_6.x86_64 (@updates)                xorg-x11-server-Xorg(x86-64) = 1.20.1-5.6.el7_6            Available: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-3.el7.x86_64 (base)                xorg-x11-server-Xorg(x86-64) = 1.20.1-3.el7            Available: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.el7.x86_64 (updates)                xorg-x11-server-Xorg(x86-64) = 1.20.1-5.el7            Available: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.1.el7.x86_64 (updates)                xorg-x11-server-Xorg(x86-64) = 1.20.1-5.1.el7            Available: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.2.el7_6.x86_64 (updates)                xorg-x11-server-Xorg(x86-64) = 1.20.1-5.2.el7_6            Available: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.1-5.3.el7_6.x86_64 (updates)                xorg-x11-server-Xorg(x86-64) = 1.20.1-5.3.el7_6  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem  You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest   Now, I get that it's missing a dependency, however, it appears to be saying it requires xorg-x11-server-Xorg version 1.20.4.   It then continues to say version 1.20.1-5.6.el7_6 is installed.  From where I'm sitting, 4 is in the range 1-5 so I'm unclear what the issue is. They all seem to be for the right architecture.  Is 1-5 a version string in and of itself as opposed to a range, or -if not- what am I missing?  Solution: Thanks to , here's a workaround:     Having the same issue, I installed manually archived xorgxrdp   yum -y install https://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/epel/7/x86_64/Packages/x/xorgxrdp-0.2.9-1.el7.x86_64.rpm   then   yum -y install xrdp and it works Proof that Pi is constant (the same for all circles), without using limits Neural network - meaning of weights