What items, gear, or other content is only available on the IOS version of Terraria?
I love the game Terraria for PC and played it for ages. Now I saw Terraria on the PS3-Store and gave it a shot. After some wandering around I saw something like a snow-biome and realised later on, that I was on a floating Island. I haven't played much of Terraria the last months, but this stuff seems kind of new. In addition I haven't found the (current) differences between the PC and the Consoleversion. Is there just one (upcoming?) Patch missing on the PC? What's included or - like the title said - what are the current differences (besides the splitscreen-feature of course)?
Why is foo.hasOwnProperty('__proto__') equal to false? A topological space $X$ is simply connected if it is pathwise connected and each closed path $u : I = [0,1] \to X$ is path homotopic to the constant path at $x_0 = u(0) = u(1)$. Recall that  A closed path $u$ is one with $u(0) = u(1)$. A closed path will also be called a loop and we write $\mathcal L'(X)$ for the set of all loops in $X$. If we want to be more precise, we say $u$ is a loop based at $x_0 \in X$ provided $x_0 = u(0) = u(1)$. By  $\mathcal L'(X,x_0)$ we denote the set of all loops in $X$ which are based at $x_0$. Also note that each constant path is a loop.  Two paths  $u, v : I \to X$ with the same initial point $x_0 = u(0) = v(0)$ and the same terminal point $x_1 = u(1) = v(1)$ are path homotopic, $u \simeq_p v$, if there exists a  homotopy $H : I \times I \to X$ such that $H(t,0) = u(t)$ and $H(t,1) = v(t)$ for all $t$ and $H(0,s) = x_0, H(1,s) = x_1$ for all $s$ (such a homotopy $H$ is stationary on the boundary $\partial I = \{0,1\}$; it is called a path homotopy). It is well-known that $\simeq_p$  is an equivalence relation on the set $\mathcal P(X)$ of all paths in $X$. Clearly $\simeq_p$ restricts to an equivalence relation on $\mathcal L'(X)$ and to an equivalence relation on each $\mathcal L'(X,x_0)$.  The set of equivalence classes $\mathcal L'(X,x_0)/\simeq_p$ is nothing else than the fundamental group $\pi_1(X,x_0)$ with base point $x_0$.   Question: Find a list, as complete as possible, of properties characterizing topological spaces which are simply connected. Each of these properties can then be taken as an alternative definition of simply connected. Note that many questions in this forum deal with aspects of simple connectedness. The answer to the present question will hopefully cover most of them. GAP: how to work with elements of the group ring of the symmetric group $\mathbb{C}[S_k]$? What is the probability one card from each suit will be represented when 5 cards are dealt? What happens if you plug more than one charger in the new MacBook Pro (2016)? Apple's  decision to convert all the ports on their 2016 MacBook Pro lineup to USB-C ports contributes to blur the difference between ports that supply power (such as a power adapters) and ports that can power external devices (such as USB keys, mice or other gadgets).    This made me think about the following scenario: you sit at a table where your laptop is plugged in on the right, and don't notice that it is plugged in, so you decide to charge it with a second nearby charger that is laying around (i.e. belonging to someone who lives with you and who recently sat at the same spot).  What would happen then?   Would the computer charge twice as fast, would one of the chargers be dismissed by the system (which one?), or would it generate a surcharge that would destroy the computer?  I couldn't find anything about this online, but since I am always trying to force a USB in the MagSafe charger of my MacBook Air, I think that I could easily end up making this kind of mistake.  Note: My question asks what happens when two chargers are inserted into a MacBook Pro, but I am also wondering what would happend if 3, or 4 chargers were inserted. Although this scenario is unlikely to happen by mistake, it would constitute an obvious vulnerability to an exposed device, i.e. in a public space. Let $L$ and $R$ be $n \times n$ matrices. I am trying to solve the following minimization problem  $$ L^{k+1} := \arg \min_{L} \lambda \|L\|_{\ast} + \frac{1}{2\mu}\|L-R^{k}\|_{F}^{2} $$ $$ \mbox{s.t.}\ L \succeq 0 $$  where $\|\cdot\|_{\ast}$ and $\|\cdot\|_{F}$ denote the nuclear and Frobenius norms, respectively. Also, $k$ expresses the $k$th iteration when solving an optimization problem successively.  I don't know how to solve this problem. Would you tell me the way? Would a backpack or cargo rack be better for commuting? Right now I use a backpack to hold all of my supplies including spare tubes, pump, patch kits, tools, my change of clothes for work, etc.  This is the backpack I use:    It's about as comfortable as a backpack can get without getting into the hiking backpacks with frames. Altogether I would say it weighs no more than 10 lbs max. The muscles in my back get slightly irritated during my commute.  Would it be more comfortable to use a rear cargo rack on my bike instead? Will adding more weight to the bike change how the bike rides and feels?  EDIT: After doing some research I came across  that explains the different methods of carrying your gear on commutes and how it affects your body. It's worth a look.  EDIT #2: Having tried both for a couple of weeks now, I can say that (for me personally) the backpack is the better way to go given the relatively light weight I have to carry.  If you do use a backpack, make sure that the straps are tightened enough so that it's positioned higher up on your back and to the point to where there is little to no movement on your back. This makes a world of difference when it comes to comfort. Dryer Outlet - 4 prong to 3 prong Our new dryer has 3 prongs vs. 4. We are changing to the new 3 prong dryer outlet, but want to make sure we are grounding. The wires coming from the wall our white, red &amp; black - the the copper wire. Do I need to ground it?? Thank you! Molly Divisibility by 7 What is the fastest known way for testing divisibility by 7? Of course I can write the decimal expansion of a number and calculate it modulo 7, but that doesn't give a nice pattern to memorize because 3 is a primitive root. I'm looking for alternative ways that can help you decide when a number is divisible by 7 by hand.  I'm sorry if this is a duplicate question, but I didn't find anything similar on the site. I've never really understood why math induction is supposed to work.  You have these 3 steps:   Prove true for base case (n=0 or 1 or whatever) Assume true for n=k.  Call this the induction hypothesis. Prove true for n=k+1, somewhere using the induction hypothesis in your proof.   In my experience the proof is usually algebraic, and you just manipulate the problem until you get the induction hypothesis to appear.  If you can do that and it works out, then you say the proof holds.  Here's one I just worked out,  Show $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{(\ln x)^n}{x} = 0$  So you go:   Use L'Hospital's rule. $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\ln x}{x} = 0$. Since that's $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{1}{x} = 0$. Assume true for $n=k$. $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{(\ln x)^k}{x} = 0$. Prove true for $n=k+1$.  You get $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{(\ln x)^{k+1}}{x} = 0.$   Use L'Hospital again: $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{(k+1)(\ln x)^{k}}{x} = 0$.  Then you see the induction hypothesis appear, and you can say this is equal to $0$.  What I'm not comfortable with is this idea that you can just assume something to be true ($n=k$), then based on that assumption, form a proof for $n=k+1$ case.  I don't see how you can use something you've assumed to be true to prove something else to be true. Multiple chrome.exe processes in Task Manager I know that each new tab on Google Chrome have its own process, but I have 14 chrome.exe processes running actually as I can see it on the Task Manager, and only two tabs are opened on Google Chrome.    Could it be due to Chrome extensions? What other reason can open more chrome.exe process and how to avoid it? Having recently introduced an overload of a method the application started to fail. Finally tracking it down, the new method is being called where I did not expect it to be.  We had  setValue( const std::wstring&amp; name, const std::wstring&amp; value );  std::wstring avalue( func() ); setValue( L"string", avalue ); std::wstring bvalue( func2() ? L"true", L"false" ); setValue( L"bool", bvalue ); setValue( L"empty", L"" );   It was changed so that when a bool value is stored we use the same strings (internal data storage of strings)  setValue( const std::wstring&amp; name, const std::wstring&amp; value ); setValue( const std::wstring&amp; name, const bool&amp; value );  std::wstring avalue( func() ); setValue( L"string", avalue ); setValue( L"bool", func2() ); setValue( L"empty", L"" ); &lt;&lt; --- this FAILS!?!   The problem with L"" is that it is implicitly casting and previously it was happy to be a std::wstring, but not it prefers to be a bool. The MSVC compiler does not complain, or raise warning, so I'm worried that even if I "fix" the setValue( L"empty", L"" ); to be  setValue( L"empty", std::wstring() );   somebody else may come later and simply use setValue( L"empty", L"" ); and have to track down this issue again.  We thought to use explicit on the method but it is not a valid keyword for this usage. Is there some way to get the compiler to complain about this, or otherwise prevent the issue?  Otherwise I'm thinking to change the name of the method which takes a bool to ensure it can't make an incorrect guess. Parent chat user still links to discuss.area51 When viewing a user who has their parent user on chat set to area51, it still links to discuss.area51, instead of the new URL, area51.meta. See:      So can we update these links? Slope of geometry as `fac` input for cycles material I have a terrain with two materials going into a Mix Shader, I want the fac input to be the slope of the terrain. Steep parts should be one color, flat part another. When is it a good idea to let an academic department (or a professor) know that I have Asperger's (or ADD)? With Asperger's, the trick is always when to explain it (in a non-awkward situation). I'd like to avoid mentioning it if possible, but it has gotten to the point that I only mention it after committing a major social faux pas, in which case it might be seen as an excuse.  With ADD, this is an issue that happens when people explain things to me. I often don't parse things very well when they're communicated to me verbally since I do have attention lapses. That's the major issue, anyways.   With that said, I do (indirectly) imply that I have both diagnoses on my personal website. Question Prove that for every integer k≥1, exists a self-complementary graph with 4k vertices half of which are of degree 2k-1 and the other half of degree 2k.  My approach So, I think the easiest way to prove what is asked is by induction. I can prove the base case for k=1, but as far as the inductive step is concerned, I cannot seem to reach a conclusion as to why if the statement holds for n, then it holds for n+1.  Any help would be appreciated. How to scale and shift voltage signal? I want to scale and shift my voltage signal by below relation:  $$ V_{out} = \frac {10} {12} \cdot V_{in} - 10 $$  Indeed my primary voltage is from 0v to 24v and I want to put it from -10v to +10v.  I try to use the below circuit but its gain is always greater than 1.    Image from SLOA097 TI.  Does anyone know how I can achieve my goal? I have ±12v and 5v power lines.  EDIT: According to the innovative solution by scorpdaddy, I thought it would be valuable to edit my question:   High input impedance is required to decrease load effects. How can it be achieved? How can I achieve the more and more accuracy? When should unions be used? Why do we need them? What is the pronunciation of "the"? I read that the definite article is pronounced differently depending on the word that follows it.  Which is the exact pronunciation of the? Best method for short time-series