Message for duplicates on Meta sites is incorrect On Meta sites we can close a question as a duplicate of another question which has no answers.    Which makes the current duplicate message incorrect:       marked as duplicate by USER X hours ago      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If   those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new   question.   At the time of writing,  is closed as a dupe of  which has no answers, but the close reason is as above (stating "already has answers").    This is for Meta sites only, main sites are different as you cannot close as duplicate if the supposed dupe question has no answers.
Meta duplicates don't require an answer. Don't suggest there is one when that's not true This request was sparked . The vote to close as a duplicate on meta, in contrast to the main site, does not require for the duplicate to have an answer. Yet, the closure message still says:     This question has been asked before and already has an answer.    ...even when this is not the case. Perhaps we should either only show this particular sentence if there is indeed an answer, or remove this altogether for meta.   Note: I fear this might be a duplicate request, but I was unable to find one. (Not even one without an answer :) )
The following MWE produces a PDF whose TOC has two entries: “Foo” and “Bar” with correct page numbers. So far, so good. However, upon clicking on the link to “Bar”, I am taken to the page for “Foo” instead.  \documentclass{report} \usepackage{hyperref} \newcommand*\backmatter{\setcounter{chapter}{0}}  \begin{document} \tableofcontents \chapter{Foo} \backmatter \chapter{Bar} \end{document}   (Produced with pdflatex, run twice.)  This MWE is whittled down from a (much!) more complex document but the above does seem to reproduce the error reliably.  Re-setting the chapter count seems to confuse hyperref, even though the page references are still accurate. Notice that in my real document, \backmatter does other things, including setting the numbering style to alphabetical so there’s no chance of confusion even though both chapters are ostensibly labelled as “Chapter 1”.  How do I fix this? Is this a bug? Are there workarounds? Converting from DMS to DD using Python in Field Calculator? I need to convert lat/long that is expressed as degrees, minutes, and seconds in the data into decimal degrees. For example, in the data, they are listed as N335042.06 in the Latitude column, and W86031.04 in the Longitude column. I have done this problem before where I created a script which converted DMS to DD, and vice-versa, so I guess I could use bits from that. But the problem I'm having is how to ignore (for lack of a better word) the 'N' and 'W' in the data? Can I skip them? And DMS are listed all together without any symbols or spaces.  Can I use len(), range(), split() to specify what part to read from the value? For example, can do the following?  N335042.06 where, 33 = degrees 50 = minutes 42.06 = seconds ...?  I came across  ESRI article, but it's in VB. Will probably use it as a reference but some of the terminology/syntax is different from Python.  Final code that works!   # Pre-logic def latDD(x):   D = int(x[1:3])   M = int(x[3:5])   S = float(x[5:])   DD = D + float(M)/60 + float(S)/3600   return DD  # Expression latDD(!Latitude!) How to work with iAds using xcode 3.1.3 So I need to find the Convergence Radius and Convergence Domain of the complex power series: $\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{2^{n}} z^{2^n}$  I've tried looking at the individual parts of the series and rewriting it somehow but couldn't find a way.  It can probably be solved, after a step or two, by the formula $R=\frac{1}{\displaystyle\limsup_{n\rightarrow \infty}\sqrt[n]{|a_n|}}$ .  Thanks. Excel function that evaluates a string as if it were a formula? Footnote in tabular environment Prove that if $|G| = p^n$ then $G$ has a subgroup of order $p^m$ for all $0\le m &lt;n.$   Since $G$ is of prime-power order I know $|Z(G)| \ne e$ so there is an $a\in Z(G)$ with order $p$ such that $p \mid |Z(G)|$. Now, the subgroup generated by is normal since it's a subgroup of the center. How can I get this normal subgroup to be less than $n$? Player A taps  targeting Player B; its "deals 1 damage to target player" ability is placed on the stack.  Player B gets priority and responds with , targeting Goblin Fireslinger.  Both players pass priority. Snap resolves, and Goblin Fireslinger is returned to its owner's hand.  Does Player B still take 1 damage from Goblin Fireslinger's activated ability?  I know that if the creature had been killed/sent to the graveyard, the ability would still resolve, but I was told recently that because a player's hand is a private zone it couldn't. If anyone could confirm or deny this for me, it would be most appreciated. Turning off Google search results indirection $f$ strictly increasing does not imply $f'>0$ We know that a function $f: [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}$ continuous on $[a,b]$ and differentiable on $(a,b)$, and if $f'&gt;0 \mbox{ on} (a,b)$ , f is strictly increasing on $[a,b]$. Is there any counterexample that shows the converse fails?   I have been trying to come up with simple examples but they all involve functions that are discontinuous or has derivative $f'=0$ which does not agree with the hypothesis hmmm Adding multiple jars to classpath on commandline Teenage girl in life-sustaining valley on poisoned Earth visited by another survivor I'm trying to identify a book I read in school, though I can't recall at what grade level; let's say it had to have been published before I graduated high school in 2000. Despite being required reading, it didn't feel much like a classic.  The story took place on Earth, after some catastrophe had caused the air to become poisonous. However, one teenage girl was able to survive because her house was in a valley which was somehow protected from the poisonous winds and was able to sustain its own ecosystem. One day, a man wearing a protective full-body suit and gas mask appears in the valley, and both are rather surprised to find someone else alive. She feeds and shelters the man and shows him how she had come to survive in the valley. Rather abruptly…      the man attempts to rape her, but she overpowers him somehow. She steals his protective suit and starts to leave the valley. He tells her that he had seen birds in a certain direction away from the valley, indicating there might be life there as well, and she leaves.   I believe there was an author's note either at the beginning or end of the book stating that the author had actually died while writing the manuscript, and that their friends or family had finished the book by going off the author's original notes, which I suppose may explain the abruptness of the ending.  In case it wasn't clear from the above, I didn't really like the book. But I'm curious about it regardless. How do I let the world know about my role-playing system? I have been working on a short narrativist system for quite some time now. I intend to offer it freely to anyone interested but I'm not sure about a couple of things:  First, how do I package it? One option is to make a website with the rules. In that case, is making lots of small interconnected pages a good idea? Or is it better to keep it linear and on as few pages as possible? Another option is to make a book-like pdf, possibly using LaTeX. Assuming people go as far as the download page, will they be willing to get the pdf? Is it easier to read?   Second, how do I let other people know? I can't just barge into forums spamming about how great my system is. Should I look for contests or challenges, like the 24Hour RPG? Is there any point to posting on social news/bookmarking sites? Is it good form to contact game review sites and ask them to consider my game?  Feel free to ignore the secondary questions if you want to; they're there only to expose my reasoning thus far and to inspire answers. Updating inherited property Notify instantly when a currently viewed post is deleted At the moment SE shows us current voting results, a notification for new answers and comments, etc., instantly. However, it doesn't show us when a post is deleted.  Please notify us also when a post is deleted. Then I don't have to type a (long) comment, only to notice the post got deleted in the meantime. What happens to the energy when waves perfectly cancel each other? What happens to the energy when waves perfectly cancel each other (destructive interference)? It appears that the energy "disappear" but the law of conservation of energy states that it can't be destructed. My guess is that the kinetic energy is transformed into potential energy. Or maybe it depends on the context of the waves where do the energy goes? Can someone elaborate on that or correct me if I'm wrong? I'm really interested in quantum theory and would like to learn all that I can about it. I've followed a few tutorials and read a few books but none satisfied me completely. I'm looking for introductions for beginners which do not depend heavily on linear algebra or calculus, or which provide a soft introduction for the requisite mathematics as they go along.  What are good introductory guides to QM along these lines? Putnam and Beyond AM-GM help youtube-dl unable to download audio how to resolve that issue? Why is the gap between the translation and the last line of the gloss so wide in my interlinear gloss?