I know arXiv.org for several years (3 to 4 years), and have used it to access extended versions of conference papers, corrected versions of published papers in a peer-reviewed journal and also search it to find whether my idea about a topic is new or not.  However, I have written several manuscript in the last two years and today, one of my friends offered me to upload my manuscripts to arXiv.org before publication, so others won't spend their time reinventing what I've done.  I have asked my supervisor, but he prohibited me from doing so, because of possible abuses might be caused by cheaters, e.g. using my work to publish somewhere else or stealing my ideas without citation. Also, he told me about the copyright forms we have signed which transfers the right of publication to the journals.  To this end, I have googled for an hour, however as time passed I found less and now I am totally confused! What should I do? What is arXiv.org for? Is it legal to upload a published paper there? Is it illegal or does it have a bad impact on the referee and the editors to see a submitted manuscript online at arXiv?  Sorry for the long text. Regards,
The recent question  made me realize that I don't have any understanding of why one would upload to a preprint site.  (I don't work in a field where they seem to be common.)  Why would one be concerned about getting a manuscript on arXiv, if it's already under review with a journal?   Is it because of the long publishing timeline of journals?  (That could explain why computer science &mdash; which publishes much more in conferences &mdash; doesn't seem to do much with them.)
How can I determine the current brew package count? I tried to get the number of available brew packages by running  brew search | wc -l   but I don't know how accurate this really is. What do I need to take into account to get a more correct number?  PS: macports lists 19,889 packages online Why does the Replace() string method not modify my string variable? First, if you have a better suggestion for title I'm really opened to suggestions, but it is the best I came up with.  If I touch an electric line and the earth, I will get electrocuted.  However, if I touch the positive of a car battery, people told me the same thing won't happen...why is it?  It seems I need to touch the battery positive and the battery ground. What is a single word for a person who, as a habit, exaggerates a lot when relating information?   So for example, they relate something that happened but exaggerate so much that they are including clear falsehood and they are well known for doing that. Convert hex string to int in Python How do I convert a hex string to an int in Python?   I may have it as "0xffff" or just "ffff". To evaluate limit of sequence $\left(\left( 1 + \frac1n \right) \left( 1 + \frac2n \right)\cdots\left( 1 + \frac nn \right) \right)^{1/n}$ How do I evaluate the limit of the following sequence $$a_n  = \left(\left( 1 + \frac1n \right) \left( 1 + \frac2n \right)\cdots\left( 1 + \frac nn \right) \right)^{1/n}$$   I tried to take log and then using cauchy $1^{st}$ theorem of limits but I coudn't do it.  Could someone kindly help? org.apache.tomcat.util.bcel.classfile.ClassFormatException: Invalid byte tag in constant pool: 15 My  objective is to classify sensor signals.  The concept of my solution so far is : i) Engineering features from raw signal ii) Selecting relevant features with ReliefF and a clustering approach iii) Apply N.N, Random Forest and SVM  However I am trapped in a dilemma. In ii) and iii), there are hyperparameters like k-Nearest Neigbours for ReliefF or the window length, for which the sensor signal is evaluated, or the number of hidden units in each layer of N.N.  There are 3 Problems I see here : 1) Tuning feature selection parameters will influence the classifier performance 2) Optimizing hyperparameters of classifier will influence the choice of features. 3) Evaluating each possible combination of configuration is intractable.  So my questions are : a) Can I make a simplifying assumption, s.t. tuning feature selection parameters can be decoupled from tuning classifier parameters ? b) Are there any other possible solutions ? Traveling to the US with new passport, visa on the old one Different batteries connected in parallel If we have 2 batteries one of emf x and the other is of emf y and we connect them in series we get an effective emf of x+y.  But what if we connect them in parallel, how to calculate the emf now? Getting full JS autocompletion under Sublime Text removeClass and fade animation Meaning of the word "axiom" Thus, axioms are propositions we assume to be true and we use them in an axiomatic theory as premises to infer conclusions, which are called "theorems" of this theory.  For example, we can use the  to prove theorems of arithmetic.  This is one meaning of the word "axiom". But I recognized that the word "axiom" is also used in quite different contexts.  For example, a group is defined to be an algebraic structure consisting of a set $G$, an operation $G\times G\to G: (a, b)\mapsto ab$, an element $1\in G$ and a mapping $G\to G: a\mapsto a^{-1}$ such that the following conditions, the so-called group axioms, are satisfied:   $\forall a, b, c\in G.\ (ab)c=a(bc)$, $\forall a\in G.\ 1a=a=a1$ and $\forall a\in G.\ aa^{-1}=1=a^{-1}a$.      Why are these conditions (that an algebraic structure has to satisfy to be called a group) called axioms? What have these conditions to do with the word "axiom" in the sense specified above? I am really asking about this modern use of the word "axiom" in mathematical jargon. It would be very interesting to see how the modern use of the word "axiom" historically developed from the original meaning.   Now, let me give more details why it appears to me that the word is being used in two different meanings:  As peter.petrov did, one can argue that group theory is about the conclusions one can draw from the group axioms just as arithmetic is about the conclusions one can draw from the Peano axioms. But in my opinion there is a big difference: while arithmetic is really about natural numbers, the successor operation, addition, multiplication and the "less than" relation, group theory is not just about group elements, the group operation, the identity element and the inverse function. Group theory is rather about models of the group axioms. Thus: The axioms of group theory are not the group axioms, the axioms of group theory are the axioms of set theory.  Theorems of arithmetic can be formalized as sentences over the signature (a. k. a. language) $\{0, s, +, \cdot\}$, while theorems of group theory cannot always be formalized as sentences over the signature $\{\cdot, 1, ^{-1}\}$. Let me give an example: A typical theorem of arithmetic is the case $n=4$ of Fermat's last theorem. It can be formalized as follows over the signature $\{0, s, +, \cdot\}$: $$\neg\exists x\exists y\exists z(x\not = 0\land y\not = 0\land z\not = 0\quad\land\quad x\cdot x\cdot x\cdot x + y\cdot y\cdot y\cdot y = z\cdot z\cdot z\cdot z).$$ A typical theorem of group theory is  which states that for any finite group G, the order of every subgroup H of G divides the order of G. I think that one cannot formalize this theorem as a sentence over the "group theoretic" signature $\{\cdot, 1, ^{-1}\}$; or can one? Computing limit of $(1+1/n)^{n^2}$ I know that atan2 gives me the absolute angle of any vector. But it doesn't give a value from 0 to 360 degrees. Instead, it gives a value (if I'm not mistaken), between 0 and 180, or between 0 and -180. For example, instead of giving angle 270, it will say -90.  This is a little confusing for me. Let me try to describe how I think this works, and please tell me if I'm correct. Actually, I'll draw it.    Is this correct? I'm having a little trouble understanding this. Thanks Is it purely a 'gotta-have-them-all' mindset, or do they actually serve some purpose?  I notice that you are able to sell them on a community market. For a test I listed one, and someone bought it for 50p. Not exactly a huge amount, but I don't understand why someone would spend real money on them.  Am I missing something?   Are they redeemable for games or money off vouchers or something 'tangible' that I'm missing? Prove that $\mathbb{|Q| = |Q\times Q|}$ How can I stop certain apps from appearing in the Dash? Edit record from site.com In site.com I have a page which iterates records of an object with data repeater.  I want to edit these records from this page ,but I didn't find anything to achieve this.  If there is any option to do this please help me to implement this.  Thanks Should we use 'Title Case' or 'Sentence case' for headlines and buttons? I am wondering if we should use  or  for buttons and headings in websites and web/mobile apps? Title Case: Manage my Account Delete my Account  Sentence case: Manage my account Delete my account  In  I found the recommendation 'choose your style and be consistent'. This is it? Aren't there any other (additional) recommendations or sources. Like for specific use cases or apps where the one style would be preferred over the other? Edit: The question refers primarily to English, but differences in other languages are also good to know.