The old gray seen in  has ... issues.  shrink factor 8:   shrink factor 9:   So, even when using shrink factor 8, which given the 4x4 pixel pattern used for pixels in grayf.mf seems like it should put 2x2 proof pixels on one display pixel, something goes wrong and we get rows of missing pixels, and when we use an unrelated shrink factor we get something much worse :-(  What gray font / xdvi flags should I use to get my metafont proofs to render correctly?
I'm working through Knuth's Metafont Book as preparation for learning Metapost and I'm running into some problems working through his "experiments".  I've installed the latest TeX Live 2013 distribution on my system but I'm having problems.  Here's the code (contained in file io.mf as recommended by Knuth):  mode_setup;  em#:=10pt#; cap#:=7pt#;  thin#:=1/3pt#; thick#:=5/6pt#;  o#:=1/5pt#; define_pixels(em,cap); define_blacker_pixels(thin,thick); define_corrected_pixels(o);  curve_sidebar=round 1/18em; beginchar("O", 0.8em#, cap#, 0); "The letter O";  penpos1(thick,10); penpos2(.1[thin,thick],90-10);  penpos3(thick,180+10); penpos4(thin,270-10);  x1l=w-x3l=curve_sidebar; x2=x4=.5w;  y1=.49h; y2l=-o; y3=.51h; y4l=h+o;  penstroke z1e{down}..z2e{right}             ..z3e{up}..z4e{left}..cycle;  penlabels(1,2,3,4); endchar;   Now, when running the mf command and loading this file, I get a window that is unfortunately empty.  Supposedly a large letter "O" should appear.  $ mf This is METAFONT, Version 2.718281 (TeX Live 2013) **io (io.mf The letter O [79]) *end Output written on io.2602gf (1 character, 1724 bytes). Transcript written on io.log.  $ gftodvi io.2602gf  gftodvi: fatal: tfm file `gray.tfm' not found.   Then, when trying to use the gftodvi command I get the above error.   Any ideas why my "window" that should display the letter "O" is blank/empty? How do I resolve the gray.tfm error? Are the two related?   Note: I'm using Ubuntu 14.04, but the TeXLive installation is NOT from the Ubuntu repository.  I used the installer from  and created a local "portable" installation.
I'm planning to use ZFS on my system (HP ML370 G5, Smart Array P400, 8 SAS disk). I want ZFS to manage all disks individually, so it can utilize better scheduling (i.e. I want to use software RAID feature in ZFS).  The problem is, I can't find a way to disable RAID feature on the RAID controller. Right now, the controller aggregates all of the disks into one big RAID-5 volume. So ZFS can't see individual disk.  Is there any way to acomplish this setup? Using ArcMap 10.0, I am working on a map that shows many villages. Each village has a name attribute that I want to use for a label, but in some areas there are so many villages that not all can be labeled. I am using the Maplex label engine and have not checked the "Never Remove (allow overlap)" box.  I am quite happy that not all village names are displayed as this would be way too much. And it is ok that Maplex chooses which labels to display, as I have no way to know which village is more important than another one. This also means that I can't base the labeling on a field such as population or something else, even though that would be less random.  However, I would also like the village points that are not labeled to similarly not be displayed. I think it unlikely that someone would want to see the point without knowing the name of the village. If all points are shown, it is also difficult to tell which point a name label goes with in crowded areas. So instead of choosing just labels not to be shown, I also want the computer to chose features not to be shown.  To give you a better idea on what I mean:    Is there a way to make these features/points not draw if their label is not shown? Is it possible to kill people indirectly with the Death Note? in the Death Note states:        Whether the cause of the individual's death is either a suicide or accident, if the death leads to the death of more than the intended, the person will simply die of a heart attack. This is to ensure that other lives are not influenced.      However,  states:        Even though only one name is written in the Death Note, if it influences and causes other humans that are not written in it to die, the victim’s cause of death will be a heart attack      Besides the fact that I find these 2 rules to be contradicting (correct me if I'm wrong), it still made me curious: Is it possible to kill people indirectly with the Death Note?  For example, writing a heart surgeon's name during a operation, or a pilot's name while mid-flight. Consider this picture of sun beams streaming onto the valley through the clouds.    Given that the valley is only (at a guess) 3km wide, with simple trigonometry and the angles of the beams, this gives the result that the position of the light source is being a few tens of km away at most.   What is wrong with the analysis? I launch a batch which call a lot of scheduled job. But I reach the governor limit :     Maximum number of Apex classes scheduled concurrently : 100   I'm wondering what happens when this limit is reached. The next scheduled jobs are waiting the number of scheduled jobs is lower than 100 for being executed or are they all cancelled ?  And is there to way to manage the number of scheduled jobs to avoir reaching this limit ? For example wait before schedule a new job if we are near the limit. Effective Refractive Index in Paper I am reading the paper, entitled "Artificial uniaxial and biaxial dielectrics with use of two-dimensional subwavelength binary gratings" by Eric B. Grann, M. G. Moharam, and Drew A. Pommet.   In the paper they mention this formula:        Do you know how it can be derived and where it comes from ? I want to know how to get size of objects like a string, integer, etc. in Python.  Related question:   I am using an XML file which contains size fields that specify the size of value. I must parse this XML and do my coding. When I want to change the value of a particular field, I will check the size field of that value. Here I want to compare whether the new value that I'm gong to enter is of the same size as in XML. I need to check the size of new value. In case of a string I can say its the length. But in case of int, float, etc. I am confused. I want to create a   How can I create a formfield with N fields, each 5 mm wide with separations like in the picture?    At the moment I use a workaround with a for loop, but this renders the code hard to maintain. Finally I need a function \formline{N}{cellwidth}{label}{value} to create the complete formfield and fill it with an optional value:   The following code is available on .   \documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{shapes}  \thispagestyle{empty} % no pagenumber. The form should be a stand alone macro... later.  \definecolor{SEPAOrange}{RGB}{254,213,161} \definecolor{SEPADOrange}{RGB}{253,185,19} \definecolor{SEPABlindcolor}{RGB}{255,0,0} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[x=1 mm, y=-1mm] \pgfmathsetmacro{\yh}{4.2333} % y heigth step defined as 1/6 inch =&gt; 1/6 * 25.4 mm = 4.2333 mm \pgfmathsetmacro{\xs}{9} % x start (own definition) \pgfmathsetmacro{\xe}{141.5} % x end (own definition) \pgfmathsetmacro{\widefield}{4.9859} % def: 134.62 mm / 27 \pgfmathsetmacro{\narrowfiels}{3.9594} % def: 134.62 mm/ 34  \filldraw[draw=black,color=SEPAOrange] (7.62, 4.5*\yh) rectangle (149.86-7.62,105.83-1); %orange background  \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xs, 5*\yh) rectangle (\xe, 6.5*\yh -1.5); %Recepient 27 Char \foreach \x in {1,...,26} {  \draw[color=SEPAOrange, line width=0.3mm] (7.62 + \x*\widefield, 5*\yh ) -- (7.62 + \x*\widefield, 6.5*\yh);  \draw[color=SEPAOrange, line width=0.7mm] (7.62 + \x*\widefield, 5.8*\yh ) -- (7.62 + \x*\widefield, 6.5*\yh); }  \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xs, 7*\yh) rectangle (\xe, 8.5*\yh -1.5); %IBAN 34 Char \foreach \x in {1,...,33}  \draw[color=SEPAOrange, line width=0.3mm] (7.62 + \x*4, 7*\yh ) -- (7.62 + \x*4, 8.5*\yh);  \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xs, 9*\yh) rectangle (\xe, 10.5*\yh -1.5); %BIC \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xe-12*5, 11*\yh) rectangle (\xe, 12.5*\yh -1.5); %Value 12 Char  \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xs, 13*\yh) rectangle (\xe, 14.5*\yh -1.5); %Subject1 \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xs, 15*\yh) rectangle (\xe, 16.5*\yh -1.5); %Subject2 \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xs, 17*\yh) rectangle (\xe, 18.5*\yh -1.5); %Subject3  \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xs, 19*\yh) rectangle (\xs+22*5, 20.5*\yh -1.5); % IBAN 22 Char  \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (149.86-17.59, 19* \yh) rectangle (\xe, 20.5*\yh -1.5); % counter \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (\xs, 21* \yh) rectangle (42.52, 24.5*\yh); % date \filldraw[draw=black,color=white] (42.52+5, 21*\yh) rectangle (149.86-17.59, 24.5*\yh); % signature  \draw[color=SEPADOrange] (0, 4.5 *\yh) --(149.86, 4.5*\yh); upper dark orange line \draw[color=SEPADOrange] (0, 20.5 *\yh) --(149.86, 20.5*\yh); lower dark orange line \draw[draw=black,color=black, line width=0.3mm] (0,0) rectangle (149.86,105.83); % black border %\draw[align=left] at (\yh,\yh) {SEPA-Überweisung};  \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} Are any of these verb phrases grammatical?        allows the user of modeling and resolving     allows the user to model and resolve      Which version of the following sentence is correct/better?        In particular, it allows to acquire a signal using a sample rate significantly lower than the one dictated by the Nyquist criterion.   In particular, it allows acquiring a signal using a sample rate   significantly lower than the one dictated by the Nyquist criterion.      I searched Google Scholar for "" and "", and it seems people use both more or less with the same frequency. Which Content Management System (CMS)/Wiki should I use? This is a general, community wiki  question to address non-specific "I need a CMS or Wiki that does x, y, and z..." questions.  If your question was closed as a duplicate of this question and you feel that the information provided here does not provide a sufficient answer, please open a discussion on .    I have a list of features that I want for my website's Content Management System (CMS) - where can I find a [free] script that includes all of them? How can one request reconsideration of a   after a certain period of time, let us say after one year? Remove HTML tags from a String What is the formula for percent of frame filled at a specific distance and focal length? I am thinking about buying a new lens specifically to take photos of distant targets (birds, bears, etc). I currently own the Canon 70-300 IS USM, which is a nice lens, but I find that if I want to take a photo of anything further away than about 10 meters, the target does not fill a large amount of the frame (meaning I have to significantly crop in post production).  I am currently looking at the Canon prime 400mm, however I would like to determine at what distance an object will fill a reasonable proportion of the frame.  Is there a formula or rule of thumb I can apply that will help me in this situation? I realise the size of the target I am shooting will play a role here, so if we need to make an assumption about the size of the target please let me know. Apparently recurrences like this cannot be solved with the Master Theorem:  $T(n) = 2T\left(\frac{n}{2}\right) + \frac{n}{\log(n)}$  Because $n^{\log_b(a)} = n^1$ is not a polynomial multiple of $f(n) = \frac{n}{\log(n)}$ since $\frac{n}{\frac{n}{\log(n)}} = \log(n)$, which is less than $n^\epsilon$ for any positive $\epsilon$.  But when is this really even an issue?   For example why wouldn't the time complexity be $n \log n$ using case 2 of the Master Theorem? Unrolling the recursion:  $$T(n) = n\sum_{k=1}^{\log_2(n)} \frac{1}{\log_2(2^k)}$$  $$T(n) = n\sum_{k=1}^{\log_2(n)} \frac{1}{k}$$  Doesn't this suggest $\Theta(n \log n)$ even though it supposedly cannot be done with Master Theorem? Let $\Gamma$ be a set of formulas and $\phi$ be a formula. Show that $\Gamma \cup \{\neg \phi\}$ is satisfiable if and only if $\Gamma\not \models \phi$.   This seemed pretty obvious but I wanted to see if my proof made sense:  Proof: $(\Rightarrow)$  To derive for a contradiction, suppose that: $\Gamma \models \phi$. That means for all truth assignments $v$, for $\gamma \in \Gamma$, if $v(\gamma) = T$, then $v(\phi) = T$.  But this contradicts our assumption that $\Gamma \cup \{\neg \phi \}$ is satisfiable by the fact that $v(\phi) = T$ cannot happen so: $\Gamma \not \models \phi$ .  $(\Leftarrow)$   So by the definition of $\Gamma \not \models \phi$, we have that there is some truth assignment $v$ which satisfies $\Gamma$ but does not satisfy $\phi$. So  that means $v(\phi) = F$ since $v(\phi) \not = T$ which implies that $v(\neg \phi) = T$ which means $v$ satisfies $\Gamma \cup \{\neg \phi\}$.    I feel like I'm missing something in the forward direction, but at the same time... It looks pretty trivial as well. Am I missing anything crucial?  Thank you! The meaning of Bit-wise NOT in Python Under what conditions does loot despawn? Why does a light object appear lighter in your peripheral vision when it's dark? So, I am not sure I can reproduce it via images, but the steps are:  1) At night, open a window and have a look at the surface of the earth  2) Suppose there's an object that reflects a tiny amount of light  3) When you actually try to focus your eyes at this object, you either don't see anything (depends on the amount of light it reflects) or you can hardly see it  4) When you focus your eyes on something that is 3-10 metres away, you can easily see this object with your ambient vision. Not the details, but it seems that it reflects more light.   Why does it happen? I've been writing checks this way for the last ~15 years or so:    Namely, the amount field is written using numbers like     1,500 and 00/100    rather than the tedious, painful spelling out of      One Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100   99 times out of 100, this works fine. But occasionally you'll get certain rare human tellers who simply refuse to believe this is a valid check and you have to fight over it. I still figure the time I've saved by not writing out all those ridiculous numbers-as-words is still worth it, overall, but it's definitely irritating.  So: who's right? Is a check with the amount written in numbers valid ... or not? How can I stop applications and services from running? When my phone starts up there are several application/services running in the background that I would rather not.  And when I press the Home button while using an app, that app usually goes into the background without exiting.  How can I stop these apps from running?