Can media corportation take away my domain name? Recently i've noticed that there is actually free cool domain name, let's say 'googleinsider.com`. Buy this domain is my dream and for some money (not so small well) i can buy this domain.  And i will use it for website then. Website is about somewhat connected with real Google. But i will not write there anything bad.  However, i understand, that if i use this domain for my project, Google will try to take it away from me, as it is a trademark or brand name. Is that possible? Is it really easy (is there are any examples of domains returned by such companies)?
Can I register a domain name that contains a company name or trademark? I wonder is it legal to register a domain name that contains a company name. For example cococola.cc (considering that this domain name is available). Can I buy and use any domain names that contain a name of a trademark?
Saying that refers to not going overboard in solving a problem when a simple solution exists So I know I've heard this saying in American English before but I just can't quite find the original.  I have come up with several made up variations like:   I don't send the Navy (or whole army, or a battalion) when all you need is a diplomat. Don't buy the whole cow when all you need is milk.   What's the more commonly heard saying/phrase for this of expression? People often use sans, the French word for ‘without’ in English.   What I don’t get, is when should that switch be made. When should I say sans when I really want to say without. Are there any general rules regarding usage, or is it kind of a person-to-person basis/feeling of flowerness. How can a particle's position be random and uncertain in quantum mechanics if it is already pre-determined in relativity? Is it possible to create an iron door which responds to levers on both sides I'm so puzzled about this:   $$a^{b^c} = a^{(b^c)} \neq (a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}.$$  Why isn't $a^{b^c}$ equal to $a^{(bc)}$? Why is $a^{b^c}$ instead equal to $a^{(b^c)}$? And how is it possible that $(a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}$?  My mind is pretty much exploding from trying to understand this. How to manually typeset text in parallel on facing pages in (Lua)LaTeX? I want to typeset a bilingual text in parallel on facing pages using LuaLaTeX. The existing solutions to automate this task have proven unsatisfactory as they don't allow for footnotes (parallel), don't allow for different font sizes of the two parallel texts (), or generally provide a poor result of aligned text chunks (eledpar).  As the text is not too long, I really came to consider breaking the pages myself. For this to do, I have to solve the following problem(s):  Consider two facing pages with ending paragraphs of different length. The following paragraphs should then begin at the same vertical position such that the beginnings of these following paragraphs face each other. For this to accomplish on has   to determine the position of the end of the longer paragraph on its page to have the means to let the next parallel paragraphs both begin at the identified position.   Is this something which is doable? Are there mechanisms provided by (Lua)LaTeX to determine positions on a page and to begin typesetting at a specific position on a page?  EDIT: The following example illustrates the task. Here the latin paragraph starting with "O tempora, o mores" (third chunk of text in the code) should begin at the facing position of the beginning of the paragraph "Shame on the age..." (fifth chunk).  \documentclass[a6paper]{scrbook} \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage[latin,english]{babel} \begin{document} \mbox{}\pagebreak  \noindent\selectlanguage{latin}{\large quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet? quem ad finem sese effrenata iactabit audacia? nihilne te nocturnum praesidium Palati, nihil urbis vigiliae, nihil timor populi, nihil concursus bonorum omnium, nihil hic munitissimus habendi senatus locus, nihil horum ora voltusque moverunt? patere tua consilia non sentis, constrictam iam horum omnium scientia teneri coniurationem tuam non vides? quid proxima, quid superiore nocte egeris, ubi fueris, quos convocaveris, quid consili ceperis quem nostrum ignorare arbitraris?\par\newpage}  \noindent\selectlanguage{english}When, O Catiline, do you mean to cease abusing our patience? How long is that madness of yours still to mock us? When is there to be an end of that unbridled audacity of yours, swaggering about as it does now?  Do not the nightly guards placed on the Palatine Hill — do not the watches posted throughout the city — does not the alarm of the people, and the union of all good men — does not the precaution taken of assembling the senate in this most defensible place — do not the looks and countenances of this venerable body here present, have any effect upon you? Do you not feel that your plans are detected? Do you not see that your conspiracy is already arrested and rendered powerless by the knowledge which every one here possesses of it? What is there that you did last night, what the night before — where is it that you were — who was there that you summoned to meet you — what design was there which was adopted by you, with{\parfillskip0pt\relax\par}  \noindent\selectlanguage{latin}{\large O tempora, o mores!\par\newpage}  \noindent\selectlanguage{english}which you think that any one of us is unacquainted?  Shame on the age and on its principles! \end{document} Is $\emptyset \in \emptyset$ or $\emptyset \subseteq \emptyset$? Pre-print service like arXiv but with private option, so I can correct my mistakes without publicly advertising my mistakes? As a student, I make mistakes all the time, and stealing my idea will not face heavy retaliation. I don't mind if someone comes up with concurrent works, but I do mind if my key idea is leaked. Many graduate students in my field therefore only use pre-print services if their papers are either publicly presented or conditionally accepted. I am looking for a website that can do most of what ArXiv does, with an additional private option or limited visibility, for example an option to make the paper unindexed by search engines. This way, my paper cannot be seen for at least a few months. By doing so, I can at least claim that I am one of the first few researchers who got the idea right. And most importantly, I can privately correct my mistakes, if any. Publishing mistakes is embarrassing and sometimes harms one's career. Many mistakes will be revealed during the peer-review processes and I have a chance to correct them before publicizing. Please kindly think twice before giving ethically and &quot;politically correct&quot; comments like no one will scoop me, everyone will cite me, and the scoopers will be punished. At least in my field, scooping and idea-stealing is commonly observable, and big-names don't care about publicizing pre-prints because they have resources to punish the scoopers. I do understand that keeping my work private might harm the community as the information becomes less transparent. However, it could also be possible that my un-reviewed flawed works misguide the community, and a paper reviewed will benefit the society more. I personally wasted six months because of someone else's mistake in a published work.  I heard that in molecular biology there is a widely-used service to upload your research data, like protein structure and sequencing, to get a timestamp. The uploaded materials can be set to be private for a period, and fully disclosed later. A lot of people do use this function. This is not exactly what I am looking for but shares some similar ideas. If I remember correctly, there is an interesting paper studying the scooping patterns with the aid of this database.  Solutions found!  and some other university-run pre-print services do have an embargo function. Moreover,  is a widely used repository, that, unlike arxiv, only displays the newest version to the general public, although still keeps a tag on the first submitted date! Using Elseif Conditional Statement in QGIS Field Calculator? How many ways can $r$ nonconsecutive integers be chosen from the first $n$ integers? What does 'Ign' , `Get` or 'Hit' mean when running an apt-get update? How can I control a servo motor with the PWM output of a microcontroller? I wanted to control the direction of servo motor with a switch. I am using an Atmega32.  Outputs are PIND4 and PIND5 and the input is PINA3, but the two servo motors turn only in 1 direction.  #ifndef F_CPU  #define F_CPU 1000000UL   #endif  #include &lt;avr/io.h&gt; #include &lt;util/delay.h&gt; #include &lt;avr/interrupt.h&gt;   int main(void) { DDRD= 0xFF ; DDRA=0x00; PORTA =0x00; // FAST PWM TCCR1A |= 1&lt;&lt;COM1A0 | 1&lt;&lt;COM1A1 | 1&lt;&lt;WGM11 |1&lt;&lt;COM1B0|1&lt;&lt;COM1B1 ; TCCR1B= 1&lt;&lt;WGM12|1&lt;&lt;WGM13 ; ICR1 = 19999 ;  TCCR1B |=1&lt;&lt;CS10 ; while (1) {    if(PORTA==0x08) //if pina3 is 1    {     OCR1A = ICR1 -2000 ;   //turn servo 1     _delay_ms(1000);          OCR1B=ICR1-2000;    //turn servo 2     _delay_ms(1000);     }     if(PORTA==0x00)// if pina3 is 0     {       OCR1A = ICR1 -900 ; //turn servo 1 in the other direction       _delay_ms(1000);               OCR1B=ICR1-900;     //turn servo 2 in the other direction       _delay_ms(1000);      } }       return 0 ;  } I know people love to close duplicates so I am not asking for a reference to start learning statistics (as ).   I have a doctorate in mathematics but never learned statistics. What is the shortest route to the equivalent knowledge to a top notch BS statistics degree and how do I measure when I have achieved that.   If a list of books would suffice (assuming I do the exercises lets say), that's terrific. Yes, I expect working out problems to be an implicit part of learning it but I want to fast track as much as realistically possible. I am not looking for an insanely rigorous treatment unless that is part of what statistical majors generally learn. Sort on a string that may contain a number I need to write a Java Comparator class that compares Strings, however with one twist.  If the two strings it is comparing are the same at the beginning and end of the string are the same, and the middle part that differs is an integer, then compare based on the numeric values of those integers.  For example, I want the following strings to end up in order they're shown:   aaa bbb 3 ccc bbb 12 ccc ccc 11 ddd eee 3 ddd jpeg2000 eee eee 12 ddd jpeg2000 eee   As you can see, there might be other integers in the string, so I can't just use regular expressions to break out any integer.  I'm thinking of just walking the strings from the beginning until I find a bit that doesn't match, then walking in from the end until I find a bit that doesn't match, and then comparing the bit in the middle to the regular expression "[0-9]+", and if it compares, then doing a numeric comparison, otherwise doing a lexical comparison.  Is there a better way?  Update I don't think I can guarantee that the other numbers in the string, the ones that may match, don't have spaces around them, or that the ones that differ do have spaces. Evaluating the limit of a sequence given by recurrence relation $a_1=\sqrt2$, $a_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+a_n}$. Is my solution correct? I did setup an easy scene with an area light behind a window. In the glass (simple plane) which is in front the area light is visible - how can I turn this off so that the background is shining throgh? Add review queues to Android app When is the move constructor called in the `std::move()` function? Using customized Coordinate System in ArcGIS Desktop? Can jQuery get all CSS styles associated with an element?