Disable Drag and Drop Functionality In Document Library in SharePoint 2013 In SharePoint we have default functionality that we can drag and drop documents in document library.  I want to disable drag and drop functionality. How can I do that?  I do not want to change in drag and drop's js that is reside in layout folder. Because it will effect on entire farm.   I want to change for specific site collection and only for document library.
How can I disable the Document Library drag and drop function? Before I start - I'm new to this SharePoint development lark and am slowly familiarising myself with it.  We're using SharePoint online and I have amended the SharePoint out-of-the-box document library to include some extra fields that are required when the user adds a new document.  If the user creates or uploads a new document then they are prompted to enter the required information. However if they use the drag and drop functionality the entry of the necessary fields is bypassed.  During my search I came across  which asks how to enforce metadata entry (which would be another good option for me). It also mentions disabling the drag and drop functionality by editing dragdrop.js and removing content from various methods.  I've had a look at the site collection I'm working on (to which I have full control) and I can't seem to find dragdrop.js (or the layouts folder for that matter).   Is this something that's held at site collection level or is it held at a higher level? I don't have admin rights above my site collection, do I need them? Do I need to use Visual Studio to make the necessary changes? (Currently I'm doing things through the web and having a bit of a play with Napa I don't have Visual Studio installed)  When I get there is it obvious what methods need to be removed? How can I tell SharePoint to use the new version of dragdrop.js? Is it just a case of saving a copy of the existing one to a different name and then editing the existing file?      I suppose the best place for me to have asked this question would probably have been on the existing post, but I am unable to post a comment on there, sorry...
What is potential energy truly? I am looking for a YA book about a boy who learns to use powers from a mind-adept, in a seemingly abandoned house. The adept helps him open his mind by using a cube. One of his powers, I believe, is to go into dreams of people that  he knows. He helps his young female neighbor friend by doing this, opening a door in her mind. He tries to open the mind-door of a local older bully, but finds out the young man can't be helped because he has been abused mentally and physically. I don't believe the book I read is past 1995. It might have the word "adept" in it. Conjugate class in the dihedral group List all the conjugate classes in the dihedral group of order $2n$ and verify the class equation.  The dihedral group is generated by two elements $r$ and $s$.   The order of $r$ is two since $r^2=e$ and $s$ is $n$ since $s^n = e$. And I know all elements can be produced as either $s^k$ or $rs^k$. How can I list all the conjugacy class? Does the curvature of spacetime theory assume gravity? Whenever I read about the curvature of spacetime as an explanation for gravity, I see pictures of a sheet (spacetime) with various masses indenting the sheet to form &quot;gravity wells.&quot; Objects which are gravitationally attracted are said to roll down the curved sheet of spacetime into the gravity well. This is troubling to me, because, in order for objects on the locally slanted spacetime sheet to accelerate, gravity must be assumed. Therefore I ask; does the explanation of gravity as the curvature of spacetime assume gravity? If yes, what is the point of the theory? If No, what am I missing? A friend of mine asked me the following question:      Suppose you have a basket in which there is a coin. The coin is marked   with the number one. At noon less one minute, someone takes the coin   number one and put into the basket two coins: the number two and the   number three. At noon less $\frac{1}{2}$ minute, he takes the coin   number two and put into the basket the coins number $4$ and the number   $5$ and so on. At noon less $\frac{1}{k}$ he takes the coin number $k$   and put two other coins.       The question is: How many coins I can find in the basket at noon?   Intuitively the answer is $\infty$ because I added one coin for infinite times. But the correct answer seems to be $0$ because every coin numbered $k$ has been removed at noon less $\frac{1}{k}$ of minute. What is the correct answer? Thanks. Editing LaTeX generated PDF Is there an application (in Windows, Unix, or Mac) that allows you to edit the LaTeX generated PDF. I know there is pdfsync, but it only gives you the line, and then you have to search where in the line you want to make the change. This is OK sometimes, for a couple of changes, but when there are lots of changes it becomes really tedious.  I would really like to accelerate this process of correcting mistakes (mostly grammar, missing commas etc.). in my document, without going through all the markup. I've heard that ratios or inverses of random variables often are problematic, in not having expectations. Why is that? The title is the question. I am told that ratios and inverses of random variables often are problematic. What is meant is that expectation often do not exist. Is there a simple, general explication of that? Every countably generated sigma algebra is generated by a random variable Show that $f_n(z)=z^n$ converges locally uniformly on $|z|&lt;1$ but not uniformly.   I am really confused. I saw a seemingly reliable reference stating that $z^n$ does not converge uniformly to $0$ on $\{|z|&lt;1\}$ but it does converge uniformly on $\{|z|\le r,r&lt;1\}$. What is the nuance between the two former sets? With $r_n&lt;1,r_n\to 1$, shouldn't one conclude that $f_n(z)$ uniformly converges on $\{|z|&lt;1\}$? And besides, this source tells me what I have to prove for Homework is disproved, which really makes it more frustrating.  I would appreciate any help. I want to be able to calculate the confidence interval from the estimated coefficient and respective standard errors.  I have a linear regression model which can be summarized (in R):  summary(fit1)  Call: lm(formula = bwt ~ height + weight + parity, data = data)  Residuals:     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max  -66.913 -10.624   0.991  10.979  55.621   Coefficients:             Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(&gt;|t|)     (Intercept) 31.19217   13.56879   2.299   0.0217 *   height       1.24964    0.23083   5.414 7.48e-08 *** weight       0.06781    0.02823   2.402   0.0164 *   parity1     -1.83309    1.19838  -1.530   0.1264     --- Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1  Residual standard error: 17.9 on 1170 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared:  0.04898,   Adjusted R-squared:  0.04654  F-statistic: 20.08 on 3 and 1170 DF,  p-value: 1.071e-12   With this model I can calculate the respective confidence intervals:  &gt; confint(fit1)                   2.5 %     97.5 % (Intercept)  4.57029503 57.8140351 height       0.79676227  1.7025207 weight       0.01243198  0.1231932 parity1     -4.18429933  0.5181151   I would expect the intervals of the predictor height to be given by  $$ 1.24964 \pm (1.96*0.23083) = [0.7972132,1.702067] $$  where 1.24964 is the estimated value for the coefficient and 0.23083 is the standard error for this coefficient. The numbers are close but not quite the same.  What am I doing wrong? What EXACTLY happens when I ask to delete my account? I have meticulously read through similar questions, answers and their comments but I still do not understand how the deletion is done. From what I understand I email the customer service and then they do what exactly?     1) They disable my account so that I can no longer use it?      2) They reassign all of my questions and answers to some other   account? To which one?      3) They delete all my questions and answers so that they go away from   public view?   What is the flexibility (if it exists) of the deletion procedure? Is it possible to erase the traces of my former association with the site. Can I request any of the following be done?     4) All of my questions and answers be deleted from public view?      5) Some of my questions and answers be deleted? If yes what criteria?      6) Can I have all of my contributions be assigned to some other   account which runs as sort of a "collective account" and already has   tons of content so that it doesn't happen like my contributions just   move to some other url but still stay grouped under that location and   therefore that location can be discovered as representing my account?      7) Can I have my contributions dispersed through several "collective   accounts?      8) Can my current public name be removed from any comments to my posts   so that my posts cannot be identified later as once belonging to me?   Please be polite with me. I wouldn't have asked if I have found the answer in the other questions. The other questions are also old and it is not clear what the situation is as per 05/2012.  UPDATE (for those interested):  I asked the Stackoverflow team about the procedure. Apparently none of the points 2-8 I asked above are possible, only 1 will take place. The link to my user page from my contributions is going to be removed and replaced with non-clickable text of an anonymized user name like "user1234". Whether this number is the same as my current user_id is not clear. That's all the information I got.  I'm going now to rename myself to "Anonymous" then request the account deletion. Those interested in the procedure will witness the exact result on this page.  Farewell. How to fix invisible form fields in Firefox while using Adwaita Dark Theme (or any other dark theme) I have this issue with some form fields in Firefox and using the adwaita-dark theme. In some webpages where the field background is white, you cannot read the text because it is also white.   This question was edited in order to clarify that this kind of wording of the question might help people who are not familiar with what a GTK+ theme. I also thing that the wording will help to get more hits through search engines. If it's still considered a duplicate, I'll accept it. How do I restore an accidentally deleted initrd image? Why use Chef/Puppet over shell scripts? New to Puppet and Chef tools. Seems like the job that they are doing can be done with shell scripting. Maybe it was done in shell scripts until these came along.  I would agree they are more readable. But, are there any other advantages over shell scripts besides just being readable? On Groups of Order 315 with a unique sylow 3-subgroup . in Dummit and Foote , an exercise asked me to prove that , if $G$ is a group of order $315$ , $G$ has a normal sylow $3$-subgroup then , $G$ is abelian .  this is exercise number $27$ , section $5$ , chapter $4$  my method on proving this is showing that $ |G| = |Z(G)|$ as follows   i showed that $|Z(G)|$ $\in$ ${ 9 , 63 , 45 , 315 } $  and  showed that$ |Z(G)|$ is not $63 , 45$ or $9$   so it must be $315 $  but i showed this under two condition ,   first condition: if $X$ is the set of all elements of $G$ of order $5$ , $H$ is the subgroup generated by $X$  then $|H|$is not $315$  second condition : also , if $Y$ is the set of all elements of $G$ of order $7$ , $N$ is the subgroup generated by $Y$ then $|N|$ is not $315$   so , if those two condition are then my method of proving works .   but i don't know how to prove those conditions .   any help ? Version error when uploading Change Set I’m trying to deploy custom objects, custom fields, page layouts, compact layouts, Lightning pages and Global value set (global picklist) , when uploading changeset it is giving me API version error as out production platform version 46.0 and SB version is 47.0 , I’m not sure how to bring the version down to 46.0 (There are no Apex triggers/classes in the changeset). Any help would be really appreciated. I have been reading Geoff Cumming's 2008 paper  [~200 citations in Google Scholar] -- and  am confused by one of its central claims. This is one in the series of papers where Cumming argues against $p$-values and in favour of confidence intervals; my question, however, is not about this debate and only concerns one specific claim about $p$-values.   Let me quote from the abstract:     This article shows that, if an initial   experiment results in two-tailed $p= .05$, there is an $80\%$   chance the one-tailed $p$-value from a replication will fall in   the interval $(.00008, .44)$, a $10\%$ chance that $p &lt; .00008$,   and fully a $10\%$ chance that $p &gt; .44$. Remarkably, the   interval—termed a $p$ interval—is this wide however large   the sample size.   Cumming claims that this "$p$ interval", and in fact the whole distribution of $p$-values that one would obtain when replicating the original experiment (with the same fixed sample size), depend only on the original $p$-value $p_\mathrm{obt}$ and do not depend on the true effect size, power, sample size, or anything else:     [...] the probability distribution of $p$ can be derived without   knowing or assuming a value for $\delta$ (or power). [...] We do not assume any prior knowledge   about $\delta$, and we use only the information $M_\mathrm{diff}$ [observed between-group difference] gives about $\delta$ as   the basis for the calculation for a given $p_\mathrm{obt}$ of the distribution of   $p$ and of $p$ intervals.      $\quad\quad\quad$    I am confused by this because to me it seems that the distribution of $p$-values strongly depends on power, whereas the original $p_\mathrm{obt}$ on its own does not give any information about it. It might be that the true effect size is $\delta=0$ and then the distribution is uniform; or maybe the true effect size is huge and then we should expect mostly very small $p$-values. Of course one can start with assuming some prior over possible effect sizes and integrate over it, but Cumming seems to claim that this is not what he is doing.  Question: What exactly is going on here?    Note that this topic is related to this question:  with an excellent answer by @whuber. Cumming has a paper on this topic to:  -- but that one is clear and unproblematic.  I also note that Cumming's claim is repeated several times in the 2015 Nature Methods paper  that some of you might have come across (it already has ~100 citations in Google Scholar):     [...] there will be substantial variation in the $P$ value of repeated experiments. In reality, experiments are rarely repeated; we do not know how different the next $P$ might be. But it is likely that it could be very different. For example, regardless of the statistical power of an experiment, if a single replicate returns a $P$ value of $0.05$, there is an $80\%$ chance that a repeat experiment would return a $P$ value between $0$ and $0.44$ (and a $20\%$ change [sic] that $P$ would be even larger).   (Note, by the way, how, irrespective of whether Cumming's statement is correct or not, Nature Methods paper quotes it inaccurately: according to Cumming, it's only $10\%$ probability above $0.44$. And yes, the paper does say "20% change". Pfff.) I know that I can create/burn bootable CD/DVD or live USB and can boot/install from it. But suppose I am currently running GNU/Linux and I've ISO file of another GNU/Linux that I want to install on my hard disk, then Can I directly boot from ISO from hard disk and try/install that GNU/Linux operating system? Fast way of copying IMAP to IMAP on CentOS I'm trying to copy of IMAP emails from one server to my new server but after Googling for hours and trying several tools, nothing is working. Is there a tool that actually works?  I am copying hundreds of thousands of emails so using a email client is out of the question, I tried it, and at the rate of a email per 2 seconds, it would take a few weeks or months!  www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync/ is commonly mentioned, however, the tool is no longer available.  I tried www.athensfbc.com/imap_tools/ which just hangs and does nothing.  Any migration tools that work? What could cause a toilet to leave the flapper up and keep running? I have an American Standard toilet I installed last year. I don't know much about plumbing, but I was able to install this toilet. It seems to function okay, except for what I think is a mechanical problem.  Sometimes when the toilet is flushed, the flapper doesn't close and water keeps running.  The handle feels like it's slightly stuck in the up position.  I looked inside the tank once when it was doing this, and the chain attached to the handle was slack. I don't understand why the flapper isn't closing.  I've tried putting more slack in the chain and loosening the plastic nut that holds the handle on the toilet, but it doesn't seem to be helping.    How can I fix this?