I have downloaded on my local machine eusflat 2019 template for paper  and using it in miktex following section in EUSFLAT2019_template.tex   \section{How Microsoft detects anomaly in azure} Microsoft uses a technology called security center \cite{microsf41} in its cloud environments.To detect threats and reduce false positives Security Center  collects data from Azure resources and network and then applies a lot of  machine learning and big data algorithms to detect threat.These techniques as more advance than normal signature based anomaly detection techniques.It is impossible to  manually identify the attack and predict the attack when it might happen.So the Microsoft \\ Security Centre uses following technologies     \newline   shows output in log as   Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph   so I want to know why is this giving me message for badness in the template.
What does the actual phrase above mean?
How are answers with the same vote score sorted? What is potential energy truly? I have a problematic question for which I have been unable to attain a satisfactory answer. What is  truly?   -  I have read about how potential energy can be seen as the "highering" of an object within a field, be it gravitational, electromagnetic, etc.   In a way, an object is lifted to a higher position, and when it eventually falls down again energy is released back.  The object does not even have to be "lifted" beforehand, as with the case of asteroids.   However, since energy cannot be destroyed, it must somehow be stored, yet how does energy truly store itself within a field? It seems hard for me to grasp that energy can physically be stored within the positioning of an object?  I can't really get my head around how a field conserves energy within it. Kinetic energy on the other hand, can be, for me, intuitively understood, as the object really is "moving" and energy manifests itself through motion.  Can anyone elaborate on this, perhaps give reasoning as to why a field can in fact "store" energy? Please point out any fallacious or naive views I seem to hold. How to add video to iphone simulator How to deal with a Pell's equation type problem with two primes A short story about finding an inhabitable planet and meeting aliens Should I format /sdcard and /data if I want to wipe all personal data with Cyanogenmod? I'm trying to completely wipe all personal data from my Nexus 4 with CM installed. I've seen different advice on different sites for making sure all my data is gone:   Just do 'Factory Reset'. Do 'Factory Reset' at least 3 times. Do 'Factory Reset' and wipe dalvik cache. ...   and so on... I'm interested in erasing all traces of my personal data from the device. It's a Nexus 4, so there is no removable storage to worry about.  My guess would be to 'wipe data/factory reset' and 'wipe cache partition' in the main recovery menu. In the mount/storage menu, I would choose 'format /cache', 'format /data', and 'format /data and /data/media (/sdcard)'. Finally, in the advanced menu, I would choose 'wipe dalvik cache'.   Is this thorough enough? Should I also choose 'format /system', 'format /firmware', etc? Are there any options I should steer clear from? I would like the phone to boot to a fresh Cyanogenmod after clearing all data. Why was this very low quality flag declined? Question (since closed and deleted): . I know about the  of VLQ flags, and I can't fathom why anyone would think that question wouldn't be a candidate for removal.  Question text, for posterity:     Hey I want a Cyrus beck line algorithm program in c or c++. I have   searched a lot but hadn't got anything over Web..!!      If anyone of you have Program please give it to me and help me out.      Thank you in advance :)   I find  not compelling because it requires me to accept the premise that this question was not "unlikely to be salvageable". Remove all content using pure JS Combinatorics - binary - very interesting question I tried to solve this problem without any success. I really hope that you will know the answer. $f(n,m)$ presents the number of binary strings (empty string included) that include at most n times '1', and at most m times '0'.      Prove: $$f(n,m) = \binom{n+m+2}{n+1}-1$$ How does the NSAutoreleasePool autorelease pool work? As I understand it, anything created with an alloc, new, or copy needs to be manually released. For example:  int main(void) {     NSString *string;     string = [[NSString alloc] init];     /* use the string */     [string release]; }   My question, though, is wouldn't this be just as valid?:  int main(void) {     NSAutoreleasePool *pool;     pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];     NSString *string;     string = [[[NSString alloc] init] autorelease];     /* use the string */     [pool drain]; } During graduate studies online application submission period, is there any preference given for an applicant if he/she submits his application at the beginning of that period compared with someone who submits his/her application couple of hours before the deadline?  Or as long as the applications are complete there is absolutely no difference! I just came over this syntax in some of the questions in this forum, but Google and any other searchengine tends to block out anything but letters and number in the search so it is impossible to search out "=>".  So can anyone tell me what it is and how it is used? Prove the Radical of an Ideal is an Ideal I am given that $R$ is a commutative ring, $A$ is an ideal of $R$, and $N(A)=\{x\in R\,|\,x^n\in A$ for some $n\}$.  I am studying with a group for our comprehensive exam and this problem has us stuck for two reasons.  FIRST - We decided to assume $n\in\mathbb{Z}^+$ even though this restriction was not given. We decided $n\ne 0$ because then $x^0=1$ and we are not guaranteed unity. We also decided $n\notin\mathbb{Z}^-$ because $x^{-1}$ has no meaning if there are no multiplicative inverses. Is this a valid argument?  SECOND - We want to assume $x,\,y\in N(A)$ which means $x^m,\,y^n\in A$ and use the binomial theorem to expand $(x-y)^n$ which we have already proved is valid in a commutative ring and show that each term is in A so $x-y$ is in $N(A)$. The biggest problem is how to approach the $-y$ if we are not guaranteed unity. Does anyone have any suggestions?  Thank you in advance for any insight. Using Illustrator CS6 to create shape out of multiple paths I am very new to Illustrator, in fact I am only experimenting with it in an attempt to help my friend develop a logo for a new business venture. I managed to draw out the shell of the logo using the line tool and modifying the lines with the anchor tool to get the shape I wanted.  However, I would like to somehow take all of these paths and create one object, or symbol which I can then apply a drop shadow, fill and various other effects too. Currently when I try to do this I get unwanted effects...  I'd appreciate any help on the subject. I am having a lot of trouble with these series questions. Up until this point, I had relatively little trouble with all the questions in the book. These seem to require knowledge about approximations of functions and other external experience-based knowledge, which I just don't have yet.  Determine convergence or divergence of the given series. In the case of convergence, determine whether the series converges absolutely or conditionally.  $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^n\left[e-\left(1+\frac 1 n \right)^n\right]$$  It's easy to see that  $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\left[e-\left(1+\frac 1 n\right)^n\right]=0$$  however, in order to apply Leibniz's Rule and show conditional convergence I need to show that the sequence is monotonically decreasing. This doesn't seem doable with straight inequalities, so I tried taking the derivative, which just resulted in an uninterpretable mess. This doesn't even begin to address the question of absolute convergence/divergence.  There are 54 of these questions... I must be missing something really fundamental if they all take this long. How and when did American spelling supersede British spelling in the US? What is mirror lockup and what is its primary function? My SLR is equipped with the mirror lockup function. What does it do, and when would I employ such a feature? I am reading through Folland's Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, and they have the following proposition and proof:     Proposition: If $\{f_{j}\}$ is a sequence of $\bar{\mathbb{R}}$- valued measurable functions on $(X, \mathcal{M})$, then the functions:      $$g_{1}(x)=\sup_{j} f_{j}(x)$$ $$g_{2}(x)=\inf_{j} f_{j}(x)$$ are   measurable.       Proof:      We have       $$g_{1}^{-1}((a,\infty])= \bigcup_{j=1}^{\infty}  f_{j}^{-1}((a,\infty])$$ $$g_{2}^{-1}([-\infty,a))=  \bigcup_{j=1}^{\infty} f_{j}^{-1}([-\infty,a))$$      Where the result follows from the fact that $g_{1}^{-1}((a,\infty])\in  \mathcal{M}$ for all $a \in \mathbb{R} \iff g$ is measurable, and   $g_{2}^{-1}([-\infty,a))\in \mathcal{M}$ for all $a \in \mathbb{R}  \iff g$ is measurable.   I understand the last part of the proof, but how do we know $g_{1}^{-1}((a,\infty])= \bigcup_{j=1}^{\infty}f_{j}^{-1}((a,\infty])$ and $g_{2}^{-1}([-\infty,a))=\bigcup_{j=1}^{\infty} f_{j}^{-1}([-\infty,a))$? I would appreciate any help with this. Why should I use an Initialization Vector (IV) when I have unique keys? I took a look at  but my question is not the same.  I have unique keys encrypting each plaintext (in CBC mode, AES-256) and I do not use a key to encrypt more than one plaintext. Is it insecure to use null IVs in this case? If it is insecure, why? How do I save files edited with vim?