\section{Main section}  \subsection{Some subsection}  \begin{table}[] \centering \caption{My caption} \label{my-label} \begin{tabular}{lllll} x &amp; y &amp; z &amp; a &amp;  \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp;  \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp;  \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp;  \end{tabular} \end{table}  Test text test text.   For some reason this table is shows up before "Main section" even though I typed it after the section header. What is the reason for this?
How to influence the position of float environments like figure and table in LaTeX?   This is a general question and should collect useful answers for all users. I hope we can use this as a reference
Impossible to hide navigation bars in Safari iOS 7 for iPhone/iPod touch I am a bit confused. When can we omit the preposition on before weekdays? (Monday, Tuesday etc.) Sometimes I read weekdays without the preposition on. If the preposition is left out, does it work the same way, or does it change the meaning?  Example without the preposition     The UGC issued the public notice Monday after its two previous orders   in this regard were overlooked by the DU.   Example with the preposition     The commission on Monday also issued a public notice against the FYUP   in all leading newspapers for parents and students. Difference between >> and >>> in verilog? What is the difference between &gt;&gt; and &gt;&gt;&gt; in verilog/system verilog? I know that == tests for only 1 and 0, while === tests for 1, 0, X, Z. So how is that similar to the shift operator? How do I programmatically determine operating system in Java? Prove using induction that from a set of $n+1$ numbers from $\{1,2,..2n\}$, at least one number will evenly divide another. Given a set of $n+1$ numbers out of the first $2n$ natural numbers, $\{1,2,\ldots,2n\}$, prove that there are two numbers in the set, one of which divides the other.  I can't tell if I'm reducing the problem in the right way.  Would it be something like:  Induction Hypothesis: A set of $n+1$ numbers from the first $2n$ natural numbers contains two numbers, one of which evenly divides the other.  Base Case: $n=1$, $\{1,2\}$, 2 is divisible by 1.  Consider a set of $n+2$ numbers, $A$, from the first $2n+2$ natural numbers. There are three cases:   Each number in $A$ is less than or equal to $2n$.  The proof follows from the induction hypothesis. One number in $A$ is greater than $2n$.  The remaining set of $n+1$ numbers must each be less than or equal to $2n$.  The proof follows from the induction hypothesis. $A$ contains both $2n+1$ and $2n+2$. I'm not sure how to solve this case.   I'm working through Udi Manber's Introduction To Algorithms: A Creative Approach for personal development, so in keeping with the spirit of the book, I'm trying to use induction.  Without induction, the question is identical to How can I swap Ctrl and Fn keys on a corporate computer? Our computers have been upgraded to HP EliteBook 8570p machines and while they're very nice machines, they are also very large -- so large that the left Ctrl key is too far away, making Ctrl+V really difficult to do with one hand.  I'm sure there are ways to re-map the keys so that their signal is swapped. But add the factor of corporate security, is there still a reasonably simple approach to this?  I'm sure you'd like more information before you can answer -- I'll try to add updates based on comments and answers. A good approximation of $(1+x)^n$ is $1+xn$ when $|x|n &lt;&lt; 1$.  Does this approximation have a name?  Any leads on estimating the error of the approximation? Two days had passed since she had last eaten or slept.   Or should it be:     Two days have passed since she last ate or slept.   Or something else? And why? The combinatorial explosion of past simple, past perfect and present perfect is killing me. Question about Subrings and integraly closed "going to do" vs. "going to be doing" Note: this post is different to , which just cites part from somewhere else, without any further analysis and thinking. Furthermore, none of the answers to that post answers my question - the situations where &quot;will (going to) be doing&quot; is more appropriate.   I will be participating in IELTS test next Tuesday afternoon.  In an online class, the teacher says the following at the beginning of the lesson.  I will be using NotePod (pointed out by red rectangle) to write relevant points we talk about today.   I guess &quot;will be using&quot; is more appropriate than &quot;will use&quot; there, right?  A  explains  This &quot;tense&quot; is used for reporting a scheduled activity with special focus on its timing— as if one is standing in the future and experiencing the flow of the time. The focus is on the temporary, ongoing, or repetitive nature of the activity.   I understand the grammar rules of those verb tenses and the difference between this group  I am going to drive home tomorrow.   I am going to be driving home tomorrow.  The former is just convey my activity in the near future while the latter probably makes an implication that &quot;don't disturb me as I am driving in that time&quot; However, in the following situations, I don't see the difference between 2 verb tenses.  Welcome back to this class. Today's lesson is for the IELTS students who are going to be taking the IELTS test. it's for everybody to be honest with you. this lesson is useful for anybody who needs to do some writing.   who are going to take the IELTS test ... Detail in bijection between Inn(G) and G/Z(G)? I am writing my thesis and using latex for first time. I would like to modify the the first page of my thesis, as it shows only name of thesis, my name etc. I would like to move all  text little-bit to right-side, just on the first page, without effecting the other pages of thesis. Any idea how can I do it?  \documentclass[a4paper,      12pt,      twoside,      openright,      cleardoublepage=empty,      numbers=noenddot,      appendixprefix,      BCOR1.5cm,      bibliography=totoc      ]{scrbook}   \thispagestyle{empty} \begin{titlepage} \begin{center}  %xyz  \end{center} \end{titlepage} \clearpage Are there rules for falling in water vs. diving vs. just jumping in for various depths of water? Just realized that in DMing 5e I have unconsciously used a falling-in-water rule-of-thumb that I inherited from somewhere (maybe 2e or AD&amp;D or maybe even Pathfinder). The ruling I've been using is as follows:   No damage for 20 feet of falling. Half-damage next 20 feet. Normal damage beyond that.   Realizing there should be a Strength (Athletics) for "swimming" (in context, "diving") to take even less damage with a proper dive in sufficiently deep water, I started to look for specifics on that. Am I just missing it somewhere? (Also didn't find it searching this stack.)  Are there clear 5e rules for both jumping and diving in water of various depths? What do we mean when we say "for all n where n is an element of..." When we write "for all n where n is an element of A, P(n) is true." do we mean for all n, if n is in A then Pn or for all n, n is in A and Pn? Listing multiple compound words How do I list multiple things that are compound words?  In my own language I'm used to writing these lists like this:  "I kicked foot-, basket-, and volleyball"  The sentence is supposed to mean that I kicked all types of balls (football, basketball and volleyball). However, it does not seem correct to me. Should I write them as whole words, with or without hyphen, or how? Do individual rays of light lose energy via the inverse square law? How to get the result of OnPostExecute() to main activity because AsyncTask is a separate class? Problem: A lot of the time I downvote something that clearly shows lack of research or effort on OP's part, and when they edit to improve it, I usually find out pretty late, because there are no notifications to help with that.  Proposition: add a Get notified when this post is edited button/checkbox under a post which you have downvoted (per post, not just all posts ever), so that if there is a significant improvement, you could remove your downvote or even change it to an upvote to show you recognize the improvement.  I believe this would improve public thinking about votes, and make people (who choose to participate like this on the SE sites more often) vote more freely and more often, and everybody else would not think of a &lt;0 post score as a death sentence for their contribution.  I'm not asking to enable this on SO (for a number of obvious reasons), and that's why I propose an opt-in subscription. This would be most useful on lower activity sites like the SE, in my opinion, but who knows.    I want to know if someone has improved their post after a downvote to reinforce the positive behavior and I get -4 on my good intentions? What kind of culture are you trying to cultivate? Please, explain why you disagree without silently downvoting. If you think there's a better way, yes, I want to know your thoughts. Macros for code annotations If 20 independent Bernoulli trials are carried out each with a different probability of success and therefore failure. What is the probability that exactly n of the 20 trials was successful?  Is there a better way of calculating these probabilities rather than simply summing together the combinations of success and failure probabilities?