how to transpose rows and columns in lightning created by data Table in sfdc  ({     fetchAc : function(component, event, helper) {         component.set('v.mycolumns', [             {label: 'Account Name', fieldName: 'Name', type: 'text'},                 {label: 'Industry', fieldName: 'Industry', type: 'text'},                 {label: 'Phone', fieldName: 'Phone', type: 'Phone'},                 {label: 'Website', fieldName: 'Website', type: 'url '}             ]);         var action = component.get("c.fetchAccounts");         action.setParams({         });         action.setCallback(this, function(response){             var state = response.getState();             if (state === "SUCCESS") {                 component.set("v.acctList", response.getReturnValue());             }         });         $A.enqueueAction(action);     } })
Canonical Question  I want to do &lt;some really cool thing&gt; with a lightning:datatable, but I can't seem to figure out how to do it. I checked the , but I did not see a way to implement &lt;this really cool feature I need&gt;.  Perhaps I want to provide tooltips, or a pick list, or alter the behavior of the menus, or display images, or show a custom component I created, or define a new row-level click behavior, or alter the keyboard event handlers, etc.  Can I somehow do this?
How does Newtonian gravitation conflict with special relativity? In the Wikipedia article , it says     After Newtonian gravitation was found to be inconsistent with special relativity, . . .   I don't see how Newtonian gravitation itself is inconsistent with special relativity.  After all, Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation is completley analogous to Coulomb's Law, so it would seem that, if there were an analogous "gravitational magnetic field", one could formulate a theory of gravitation in exact analogy with Maxwell's Theory of Electromagnetism, and of course, this would automatically be consistent with Special Relativity.  What about this approach to gravitation does not work?  The only problem I could see with this is the lack of evidence for a "gravitational magnetic field".  That being said, gravity is "weak" as it is, and my guess is that it would be extremely difficult to set up an experiment in which a massive body were moving fast enough for this "magnetic field effect" to be obsevable.  EDIT:  As has been pointed out to me in the answers, Newton itself is inconsistent with SR.  Similarly, however, so is Coulomb's Law, yet, electromagnetism is still consistent with SR.  Thus, how do we know that it is not the case that Newton's Law is the special "static" case of a more general gravitomagnetic theory exactly analogous to Maxwell's Theory:  Let $\mathbf{G}$ be the gravitation field, let $\rho$ be the mass density, and $\mathbf{J}$ be the mass current density, let $\gamma _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{4\pi \gamma _0}=G$, the Universal Gravitation Constant, let $\nu _0$ be defined so that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{\gamma _0\nu _0}}=c$, and suppose there exists a field $\mathbf{M}$, the gravitomagnetic field, so that the following equations hold: $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\rho}{\gamma _0} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{M}=0 $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{G}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t} $$ $$ \vec{\nabla}\times \mathbf{M}=\nu _0\mathbf{J}+\gamma _0\nu _0\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t} $$ where theses fields would produce on a mass $m$ moving with velocity $\mathbf{v}$ in our inertial frame the Lorentz force $\mathbf{F}=m\left( \mathbf{G}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{M}\right)$.  This theory would automatically be consistent with SR and would reduce to Newton's Law of Gravitation for the case of gravitostatics:  $\frac{\partial \mathbf{G}}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial \mathbf{M}}{\partial t}=\mathbf{J}=0$.  (To be clear, you can't just set the time derivatives equal to $\mathbf{0}$ as it seems I have done.  Upon doing so, you obtain the corresponding static theory, which is technically incorrect (as you can easily see because it won't be relativistically invariant), but is nevertheless often a useful approximation.)  My question can thus be phrased as:  without appealing directly to GR, what is wrong with this theory? If I have an i.i.d. random variables $X_i$ from a uniform distribution on $[0,1]$.   How would I find scaling sequences $a_n$, $b_n$ such that $a_n(M_n − b_n)$ converges in distribution to a non-trivial limit function $G$ for  $ Y_i = X_i,$ and $M_n = \max(Y_1,...,Y_n) $ How to compare two TeX codes and mark differences with color I would like to find easy tool, which compares two TeX codes and generates a PDF file of the first code, in which the differences from the second code are marked by a given color. I use winedt 7.0 under windows 7.  I just noticed that latexdiff provides what I need. As far as I understand it is included in Miktex. Is there an interface (menu commands) in winedt 7.0, which allow to work with latexdiff ? Where can I download Windows 7 (legally from Microsoft)? I just bought a serial for Windows 7 on-line from the Microsoft store (the most painful shopping experience EVER!). I selected that I wanted to download my version of Windows 7 after purchase. After payment, I have listed a Product Key but no download link in sight.   Where do I download my Windows 7 ISO to burn to disk?  Note: I'm not a Technet or MSDN subscriber. How to read value of variable, where the name of variable is the value of another variable Graph nodes coordinates evaluation Prove $\alpha \in R[[x]]$ is a unit iff $a_0 \in R$ is a unit Prove $\alpha \in R[[x]]$ is a unit iff $a_0 \in R$ is a unit.   $"\Rightarrow"$ suppose $\alpha \in R[[x]]$ is a unit, where $\alpha = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_nx^n$  then there exists an inverse $\beta = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_nx^n$   stuck at this spot,  $(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_nx^n)(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_nx^n) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(\sum_{k=0}^{n}(a_kb_{n-k}))x^n$  A little mixed up on how this becomes $1 = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}e_nx^n$ where $e_0 =1, e_{n&gt;0} = 0$ and why that would make $a_0b_0 = 1$ which would make $a_0 \in R$ a unit. I haven't tried the other direction yet.  EDIT  Maybe I get it, because we assumed this sum is a unit then its inverse exists and so the $x^0=1$ and all $a_ib_i=1$ thus $a_0b_0=1$ which gives $a_0$ is a unit in $R$ Make Firefox save new bookmarks in the Bookmarks Menu (not Other Bookmarks) Recently, Firefox has changed the default folder for newly created bookmarks (using Ctrl+D) from the Bookmarks Menu to "Other Bookmarks".  Is there some way to change that back? Or some alternate method instead of Ctrl+D?  EDIT  A native way to do this (without an add-on) would be best. Proving that $n$-cycle has order $n$ It seems that in the words Englishman, Frenchman, and Scotsman, the ‑man part is pronounced /mən/ (just like in Roman).  Whereas in snowman, the ‑man part is pronounced /mæn/ (just like in no man).  Why is it that when ‑man is appended to snow‑ to make snowman, the pronunciation of the man part doesn’t change?    Wouldn’t it logically follow for it to be pronounced /ˈsnowmən/ not /ˈsnowˌmæn/? Logo is slightly misaligned How to pass parameters to an alias? Importing only certain rows between spreadsheet documents Document 1 has many rows of data.  How do I import into document 2 only those rows that have a certain value in column C? Which external Javascript libraries work with Lightning Locker Service? Components often seem to work with external libraries until the Locker Service is enabled. What libraries work with locker service enabled and where can I go to find out? If I have $10$ apples, but you have $5$ apples, then I have $2$ times more apples than you. But what if I have $10$ apples, but you don't have any apples?   If you look at the graph $f(x)=\frac{10}{x}$, it shows that when $x$ approaches $0$, $f(x)$ approaches infinity. So it means I have infinity times more apples than you? Connection pools being reset with Error: 18056, Severity: 20, State: 46. & Perfmon Counters not showing We are using SQL Authentication (to reduce the number of connection pools) &amp; .NET 4.0 connection strings to connect to SQL Server Enterprise Edition 2012 SP1 on a Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise Server:     Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP1) - 11.0.3000.0 (X64)   Oct 19 2012 13:38:57   Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation   Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1  (Build 7601: Service Pack 1)   We use about 50 servers split into 8 different groups different parts of a website.  Our website is using this SQL Server to log visit tracking data. Over the last few days it has spat out the following messages about the resetting connection pools:     The client was unable to reuse a session with SPID 1327, which had been reset for connection pooling. The failure ID is 46. This error may have been caused by an earlier operation failing. Check the error logs for failed operations immediately before this error message.   Error log reads:     Error: 18056, Severity: 20, State: 46.   The client was unable to reuse a session with SPID 959, which had been reset for connection pooling. The failure ID is 46. This error may have been caused by an earlier  operation failing. Check the error logs for failed operations immediately before this error message.   Login failed for user 'xxxx'. Reason: Failed to open the database 'xxxxxxxx' configured in the login object while revalidating the login on the connection. [CLIENT: 10.xx.xx.xxx]   After some digging, I found this document on the CSS blog:  and this one by Aaron Bertrand: . I know the error number is different but the failure ID is the same with a number of the messages are identical).  Failure ID 46 suggests that the login did not have permissions. Our logins default to the master database and the db name is specificied in the connection string.  I wanted to check the number of connection strings pools, etc. and checked all the counters in Perfmon for .Net Data Provider for SqlServer. It only gave me the option of defaultdomain9675 for the instance, so I selected that assuming that is a system generated ID name for our Datacentre network. Unfortunately all of the counters are reading zero. On one of our other main servers the connection pools are hovering around 10 which is what I expected to see on a healthy server with that kind of load.  My question is 3 fold   Can anyone suggest why the Windows 2008 R2 Server is not showing .Net Data Provider for SqlServer? Has anyone experienced this as I obviously believe that the login not having permissions is a red herring ? If different groups of web servers have the same connection string syntax but with slightly different whitespace, would this cause the server to use another connection pool?   Min &amp; max memory settings are 20GB &amp; 58GB respectively. The server is a dedicated database server with 64GB of RAM. I don't think memory is the issue as the box seems to have a decent page lfe expectancy. Auto close is not enabled. The server is always up: this is a 24x7 website with heavy usage. What is the $\sqrt{i^4}$?   $i^4$ = $(i^2)^2$ So is $\sqrt{i^4}$ = $\sqrt{(i^2)^2}$ = $i^2$ = $-1$?  Or is $\sqrt{i^4}$ = $\sqrt{1}$ = $1$?  When I plug it into my TI-89 Titanium, I get $1$.  Edit: I now see why $i^4 \neq -1$. $$\sqrt{x^2} = \left|{x}\right| $$ So$$\sqrt{(i^2)^2} = \left|i^2\right| = \left|-1\right| = 1$$ Create an instance of a class from a string Is there a way to create an instance of a class based on the fact I know the name of the class at runtime. Basically I would have the name of the class in a string. Identify cartoon about a set of fairy/demon twins in a far future where the demon uses propaganda to take over the world I'm looking for a cartoon from the 70's (I believe) which is about a set of twins; one plump "fairy" and a skeletal "demon". The "fairy" has magic powers and ends up living a life of pleasure, while the "demon" flees and turns evil.  When the "demon" finds his new weapon in the ruins of the ancient world (roughly modern day) he plots to enslave the world; the weapon in question is a set of propaganda movies with Adolf Hitler. Can you raise a number to an irrational exponent? The way that I was taught it in 8th grade algebra, a number raised to a fractional exponent, i.e. $a^\frac x y$ is equivalent to the denominatorth root of the number raised to the numerator, i.e. $\sqrt[y]{a^x}$. So what happens when you raise a number to an irrational number? Obviously it is not so simple to break it down like above. Does an irrational exponent still have a well formed meaning?  The only example that comes to mind is Euler's identity, but that seems likes a pretty exceptional case. What about in general?