I have 50 servers. I manage them from a central management server.   I could open a query and get result for each one at the same time. But I want to do it in an automated way, like a job, to collect data from each server and store/handle it locally.  Is this possible and if so, how?
I have 50 servers. I manage them from a central management server on SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition. I don't use repository.  I could open a query and get result for each one at the same time. But I want to do it in an automated way, like a job, to collect data from each server and store/handle it locally.  Is this possible and if so, how?
Attributive nouns vs. of-genitive Automorphism group of the quaternion group Let $Q_8$ be the quaternion group. How do we determine the automorphism group $Aut(Q_8)$ of $Q_8$ algebraically? I searched for this problem on internet. I found some geometric proofs that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to the rotation group of a cube, hence it is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_4$. I would like to know an algebraic proof that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to $S_4$. Why is the decay of a neutral rho meson into two neutral pions forbidden? Are there any downsides to passing structs by value in C, rather than passing a pointer? Are there any downsides to passing structs by value in C, rather than passing a pointer?  If the struct is large, there is obviously the performancd aspect of copying lots of data, but for a smaller struct, it should basically be the same as passing several values to a function.  It is maybe even more interesting when used as return values. C only has single return values from functions, but you often need several. So a simple solution is to put them in a struct and return that.  Are there any reasons for or against this?  Since it might not be obvious to everyone what I'm talking about here, I'll give  a simple example.  If you're programming in C, you'll sooner or later start writing functions that look like this:  void examine_data(const char *ptr, size_t len) {     ... }  char *p = ...; size_t l = ...; examine_data(p, l);   This isn't a problem. The only issue is that you have to agree with your coworker in which the order the parameters should be so you use the same convention in all functions.  But what happens when you want to return the same kind of information? You typically get something like this:  char *get_data(size_t *len); {     ...     *len = ...datalen...;     return ...data...; } size_t len; char *p = get_data(&amp;len);   This works fine, but is much more problematic. A return value is a return value, except that in this implementation it isn't. There is no way to tell from the above that the function get_data isn't allowed to look at what len points to. And there is nothing that makes the compiler check that a value is actually returned through that pointer. So next month, when someone else modifies the code without understanding it properly (because he didn't read the documentation?) it gets broken without anyone noticing, or it starts crashing randomly.  So, the solution I propose is the simple struct  struct blob { char *ptr; size_t len; }   The examples can be rewritten like this:  void examine_data(const struct blob data) {     ... use data.tr and data.len ... }  struct blob = { .ptr = ..., .len = ... }; examine_data(blob);  struct blob get_data(void); {     ...     return (struct blob){ .ptr = ...data..., .len = ...len... }; } struct blob data = get_data();   For some reason, I think that most people would instinctively make examine_data take a pointer to a struct blob, but I don't see why. It still gets a pointer and an integer, it's just much  clearer that they go together. And in the get_data case it is impossible to mess up in the way I described before, since there is no input value for the length, and there must be a returned length. Square roots -- positive and negative It is perhaps a bit embarrassing that while doing higher-level math, I have forgot some more fundamental concepts. I would like to ask whether the square root of a number includes both the positive and the negative square roots.  I know that for an equation $x^2 = 9$, the solution is $x = \pm 3$. But if simply given $\sqrt{9}$, does one assume that to mean only the positive root? And when simply talking about the square root of a number in general, would one be referring to both roots or just the positive one, when neither is specified? tl;dr : For SEO, should I redirect from one to the other or list both on the DNS records?    It seems that most experts think that both www and non-www should exist. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.) And Google Webmasters Tools lets you choose which is the main one.  But: will a redirect give all SEO weight to one of them instead of splitting it? (There are other search engines after all, so setting the main one in Google Webmasters Tools might not be enough.) Will having both on the DNS records give them more importance? No difference? "INSERT IGNORE" vs "INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE" While executing an INSERT statement with many rows, I want to skip duplicate entries that would otherwise cause failure. After some research, my options appear to be the use of either:  ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE which implies an unnecessary update at some cost, or INSERT IGNORE implies an invitation for other kinds of failure to slip in unannounced.  Am I right in these assumptions? What's the best way to simply skip the rows that might cause duplicates and just continue on to the other rows? Teams of users rails app I want the QED symbol to be 1 line lower at the end of proof Just as my title says, I would prefer to have my qed symbol to be 1 line lower than the last line of my proof. By default its on the same line and aligned to the right.   How can I achieve this?  EDIT: See below code for an example:  \documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage[margin=3cm]{geometry} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{amsmath, amsthm} \begin{document}  \begin{proof}     Hello there good chap! I'll put in another line here just to be sure its clear what I mean. \end{proof}    \end{document} Create model from XYZ data points In the Futurama episode "" they save the world by rotating the Earth backwards saying it shouldn't matter (which direction Earth rotates). If Earth rotated clockwise and remained in it's current counter-clockwise orbit around the Sun, would it affect anything beyond the direction the constellations move across the sky? I get a long list of such arrays  {     "id": "byu6g6c4cjys5mdkg5znh8ju8c",     "create_at": 1511875272294,     "update_at": 1511875272294,     "delete_at": 0,     "display_name": "BMA",     "name": "BMA",     "description": "",     "email": "aleksandar.ivanov@random.com",     "type": "O",     "company_name": "",     "allowed_domains": "",     "invite_id": "gdgz1tbxuinntx1fbr1ax7kehy",     "allow_open_invite": false,     "scheme_id": null   }   I want to get by JQ only the ID where the name is BMA. At the moment I parse " jq -r '.[]["name"]" and I can filter the output from curl by name and I will get "BMA" and also 100 other names, but I need to filter only the ID where name is =BMA. Any ideas? Adding a reference between Eclipse Java projects What vintage movie had this blue floating holographic head talking to some kind of military installation? I'm following the , but on launching the upgrade tool I get this response:  Checking for a new ubuntu release No new release found   Am I doing something wrong? Is there a workaround? How can I easily clone my entire system? I am running an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and I experienced some issues with my hard drive. I bought a new HDD of the same size (1TB), and I intend to move all my data (softs, work, pics, etc.) on the new HDD.  What is the easiest way to do that? Why do the Walking Dead Zombies only show intelligence in the very first episode? I enjoy The Walking Dead, however one question keeps nagging me. The 'Walkers' are always shown to not have any intelligence or memory of having been human. This is for all seasons except the very first one.  In the very first scene of Season One, Episode One, we see a little zombie girl stop to deliberately pick up a teddy bear from the ground.   Later in the same episode we see a zombie apparently try to turn the door knob to get into Morgen Jones' house.  Also at Atlanta they can climb fences and used rocks to break glass.  After season 1 I do not recall seeing any such intelligence demonstrated by a zombie again.  My question is: are these initial displays of intelligence a discrepancy in the story, or is there a plausible explanation why the Walkers performed these actions? I’m not sure What it is? I’m trying to get a glossy shade to building in my scene as soon as I put roughness to zero I see these trees in glass. I have no trees in my scene anywhere, background is black. Even when I render I see these trees. How can I get rid of them and still keep my glossy building material. I'd like to put some shared Javascript to Resource file to reuse it between several components. This Javascript is general purpose set of utility functions. However, functions from my resource file are not available from the Components. Static resource (named TestScript):  function helloWorld() {      return 42; }   Component:  &lt;ltng:require scripts="{!$Resource.TestScript}" &lt;ui:button label="Do job" press="{!c.doJob}"/&gt;   Controller:  doJob: function(cmp, event, helper) {      var i = helloWorld();      // failed with Uncaught ReferenceError: helloWorld is not defined }   I don't like to use  &lt;ltng:require scripts="{!$Resource.***resourceName***}" afterScriptsLoaded="{!c.afterScriptsLoaded}" /&gt;   because my static resource is a set of functions and I'd like just use them as functions later in my controllers. How can I achieve that (if possible)? If not, what's the suggested solution? Where does the name of these two famous types of sequences come from?  The article  of Wikipedia says that the geometric sequence is called like this because every term is the geometric mean of its two adjacent terms. Though it is true, it only reduces the question to: why is the geometric mean geometric (in opposition to the arithmetic mean).   Continuing my investigation on , I was told that a square with the same area than a rectangle with sides $a$ and $b$ has their geometric mean $\sqrt{ab}$ for side. That's again totally true, but a square with same perimeter than this rectangle of sides $a$ and $b$ has their arithmetic mean $\frac{a+b}{2}$ for side!  Thus, my question: Who coined these names? And why? Why is the geometric mean more geometric than the arithmetic mean?