So if I want to apply some function to a big and complex expression, I'd like to use \left( \right) because it scales the parentheses to match the expressions height. However, when doing this, extra space is introduced. Compare f(x) and f\left(x\right):  Source: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \setlength{\parindent}{0em} \begin{document} \( f(x) \) (small) \\ \( f\left(x\right) \) (large) \end{document}
Why does the addition of a \left and \right introduces an extra space around the formula? Specifically, why do $\cos(\theta)$ and $\cos\left(\theta\right)$ render differently?  Is there a way to use resizable delimiters without introducing the spurious spaces?  Why did Knuth design it like this?  Edit: This occurs too, if \operatorname{MYOP} or some other operator, like \lim, \min etc. is used. (This edit is basically to make it easier to find this answer.)
Item cannot be installed or removed until the package catalogue is repaired What's the 'correct' way of registering/installing an Assembly to the GAC? "He needn't say" / "He doesn't need to say" When I studied English at school (in Italy, more than 35 years ago), we were taught a rule according to which one should say, e. g., "He needn't (need not) say", but NOT "He doesn't need to say".  If I'm not mistaken, it was explained to us that the rule holds good with the following limitations:  1) only in the negative form: thus, "He needn't say", but "He needs to say", and "Does he need to say?";  2) only in the present tense: thus, "He needn't say", but "He didn't (won't, wouldn't, etc.) need to say";  3) only when an infinitive follows: thus, "He needn't see a doctor", but "He doesn't need a doctor".  But, if I google "doesn't need to", I find 125,000,000 occurrences.  I was wondering: does the rule hold good more for British than for American English?  Also, perhaps it isn't an absolute rule, and both constructions ("He needn't say" and "He doesn't need to say") are possible.  Is the rule at least a good description of the circumstances when we CAN (but needn't necessarily) use this construction?  Thank you very much, for this and the other answers. Are {/bin, /lib, /sbin} symlinks into /usr in Ubuntu? I do not have access to an Ubuntu system or chroot. I was hoping if someone could tell me if the  is accurate in saying:     For Quantal, merged /usr should be supported. On new systems installer should create {/bin, /lib, /sbin} symlinks into /usr. Is product of two closed sets closed? If $A$ is closed in $X$ and $B$ is closed in $Y$,   does it follow that $A \times B$ is closed in $X \times Y$ ? Continuous v. per-chapter/section numbering of figures, tables, and other document elements Many To many for Bulk records I have created two custom objects (A and B)and a junction object(AB). i.e. Both A and B have Many to Many relationship. Now I need to insert 5000 records. How can I automatically populate the relation in Junction object. DO I have to write any trigger or Do I have to do Manually mapping the records? A quick search for ESTA application returned many results. According to , the official site to apply for an ESTA is .  Are the others scams, legitimate third party resellers or "added value" services?    (defunct - domain is for sale circa 2020)     Can anyone confirm either way?  Updated 2020: The above have better "not affiliated with the U.S. Government" warnings now, but beware there are newer more sneaky sites starting all the time:        And fortunately more official guidance about this issue: Easiest way to prove that $2^{\aleph_0} = c$ $\aleph_0$ is the cardinality of the set of natural numbers, $\aleph_0 = |N|$. $c$ is the cardinality of the continuum, i.e. the set of real numbers $c = |R|$.  I know that $|P(A)| = 2^{|A|}$. This means that the cardinality of the power set of a set is 2 raised to the power of the cardinality of that set.  This basically means that to prove  $2^{\aleph_0} = c$, I need to prove $c = |P(N)|$. I've seen the Cantor diagonal argument, although I have no idea on how to use it to prove this.   Could anyone suggest ideas of the simplest way to prove that $2^{\aleph_0} = c$? Adding a reference between Eclipse Java projects I am working on Ubuntu 12.04 64bit.  I want to add "Open terminal here" to Nautilus context or right-click menu but it tries to download 32bit version from Internet. I've posted a question  that I have a 32bits windows 7 on a dual boot machine with ubuntu 10.04 upgraded to 11.04. From the responses I had from the questions, I decided to reinstall the windows 7 but this time a 64bits version.  I've install the grub on the first section of the HDD on which ubuntu is install, meaning the 2nd Drive.  I still want guidance before I proceed.  What would you suggest me as best way to achieve that without disturbing the boot loading.  thank you for reading this. Accidentally hit "toggle full screen", How do I exit? I'm stuck in full screen in the node editor. Escape isn't working, and I have no menus and no idea how to leave except to quit Blender and reopen the program. Git for beginners: The definitive practical guide Ok, after seeing , I have decided to skip to the end and go with .  So what I need is a beginner's practical guide to Git.  "Beginner" being defined as someone who knows how to handle their compiler, understands to some level what a  is, and has touched source control without understanding it very well.  "Practical" being defined as this person doesn't want to get into great detail regarding what Git is doing in the background, and doesn't even care (or know) that it's distributed.  Your answers might hint at the possibilities, but try to aim for the beginner that wants to keep a 'main' repository on a 'server' which is backed up and secure, and treat their local repository as merely a 'client' resource.  So:  Installation/Setup    How do you set up Git?  Try to cover Linux, Windows, Mac, think 'client/server' mindset.         Working with the code          How do you handle binary files (visio docs, for instance, or compiler environments)? How do you merge files changed at the "same time"?    Tagging, branching, releases, baselines    How do you pull a particular 'release'?   How do you resolve conflicts and complete the merge? How do you merge parts of one branch into another branch?        Other   Describe and link to a good GUI, IDE plugin, etc. that makes Git a non-command line resource, but please list its limitations as well as its good.    - Cross platform, included with Git  - Cross platform history viewer, included with Git  - Mac OS X  - Mac OS X history viewer  - Cross platform, commercial, beta  - console GUI for Linux  - GUI for Windows, Linux  - package for Windows, includes friendly GUI  Any other common tasks a beginner should know?     How do I work effectively with a subversion repository set as my source control source?   Other Git beginner's references                 Delving into Git     (and )    I will go through the entries from time to time and 'tidy' them up so they have a consistent look/feel and it's easy to scan the list - feel free to follow a simple "header - brief explanation - list of instructions - gotchas and extra info" template.  I'll also link to the entries from the bullet list above so it's easy to find them later. I'm using +[NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] to store application settings. This consists of roughly a dozen string values. Is it possible to delete these values permanently instead of just setting them to a default value? Linux equivalent to PowerShell's "one-to-many" remoting When considering the Doppler shift, the 'canonical equation' is  $$f=\frac{c+vr}{c+vs}f_0$$  However, this equation seems to run into trouble in the following situation: A light source inside water is moving at a speed $v$ towards a receiver outside the water. Can we modify the above equation to deal with a transition between two media? Or is there a completely different formula that applies here? Is “are” a borrowed word? I read somewhere that English is the only language to have borrowed a form of its to be verb from another language. I want to say, if memory serves, that it was are that was borrowed from an early Scandinavian language. Is that so?  I know Old English had sind for one of their pronouns inflections of be, the same as in German.  But did it switch to are naturally from some other gentler evolution, or was it borrowed? How to prove that we are living in a 3+1D world? Is there any scientific experiment that can lead us to conclude we live in 3 spatial dimensions without the premise of the conception of limited dimensions?  Thank you all who helped in the improvement of this question (which was not clear at first).   EDIT:  I know that this can be a little philosophical, but it is also a scientific question.  Let's consider the scenario where the mankind was not ever able to see.  Let's also consider that this limitation could be surpassed thus not limiting us to reach a scientific and technological knowledge "similar" to what we have today.  Would this civilization of blind people reach the conclusion that they are living in a 3D spatial world?  Is the sense of touch enough to reach that conclusion? Is there any scientific experiment that can lead us to that conclusion without the premise of the conception of limited dimensions?  Would it be easier, harder, or just different to reach a conclusion predicted by the M-Theory? (please do not focus only on this last question) Load jQuery from Stack's CDN if Google's CDN is blocked (or always)