Today I'm dealing with the following problem:    Is there some way I can get rid of these without spending my entire day clicking, short of Homer's Drinking Bird?     Note: This is not a duplicate of , because the notifications in my question aren't shown at all in the Notification Center, and thus the solution in that question doesn't work for this question.
I have notifications in the OSX Notification Center, as for most of my apps I am using the setting, "Show in Notification Centre: 10 Recent Items" This is a good setting but rather than have a very full Notification Center, I would still like to clear it from time to time with 1 click.  I am using Yosemite 10.10.3
Why is $\sqrt{-x}*\sqrt{-x}=-x?$ How do I create a reflective white material? I'm pretty new to this and this is my first question here, any help would be greatly appreciated.  So basically what I want to achieve is a floor material as seen in this photo...    ...the reflections are very crisp but dim.  With a glossy shader I get the following results:    First picture: reflections are blurry  Second picture: roughness of the material looks right but reflection is bright red  Third picture: If tinted in any other color than white, it seems to produce the result I want. Reflection is sharp and gets tinted blue. What I need is the reflection to be tinted white.  Thanks for any help. I am unable to understand what exactly is critical value.My question here is why do we fail to reject a null hypothesis when the test statistic is within the range of critical value.  What i am trying to ask is what is the property of the critical value that makes the hypothesized value to fall within the range implied by the critical value.  Thanks in advance How to store date/time and timestamps in UTC time zone with JPA and Hibernate I'm working from the URL I found here:    My ssh client is Ubuntu 64 bit 11.10 desktop and my server is Centos 6.2 64 bit. I have followed the directions. I still get a password prompt on ssh.  I'm not sure what to do next. What should the standard spelling be - British or US? When you create a script via the Unity editor, it generates a script with some pre-formatted code.  using System.Collections; using System.Collections.Generic; using UnityEngine;  public class GenericClass : MonoBehaviour {      // Use this for initialization     void Start () {      }      // Update is called once per frame     void Update () {      } }   When I create a script, I am generally guaranteed to use additional code, such as a namespace or a custom editor. Furthermore, I almost always delete content from the automatically-generated script. Is there a way to change the automatic code generated by Unity? If the laws of random variables weakly converge to a point mass at $c$, then the random variables converge in probability to $c$. This is question 10.3.1 from Rosenthal's First Look at Rigorous Probability.  Suppose $\mathcal{L}(X_n) \Rightarrow \delta_c$ for some $c \in \mathbb{R}$. Prove that $\{X_n\}$ converges to $c$ in probability.  Here $\mathcal{L}(X_n)$ refers to the distribution of $X_n$.  Is the following proof correct?  Is a simpler proof available?  Is there a simple proof using Skorohod's theorem?  I attempted to prove the contrapositive. Suppose $X_n \not \to c$ in probability.  This means that there is an $\varepsilon &gt; 0$ so that for all $N$, there exists an $m &gt; N$ such that  \begin{equation}   P(|X_m - c| \geq \varepsilon) &gt; \eta, \text{ for some $\eta &gt; 0$}. \end{equation}  Consider  \begin{equation}   B := \{x \in \mathbb{R} : |x - c| \leq \varepsilon\} \in \mathcal{B} \text{ the Borel sets on $\mathbb{R}$}. \end{equation}  Then $B^c \in \mathcal{B}$ and denoting the distribution of $X_n$ as $\mu_n$ we have  \begin{equation}   \mu_n(B^c) = P(X_n \in B^c) = P(|X_n - c| \geq \varepsilon) &gt; \eta. \end{equation}  For all $N$, there exists an $m &gt; N$ such that the cumulative distribution function of $X_m$ is not the same as the cumulative distribution function of $\delta_c$; in particular it's mass changes somewhere at least $\varepsilon$ distance from $c$. Finally because $\delta_c(\{x\}) = 0$ for all $x \neq c$ this completes the proof. This is a follow up to   I am using a SHA-256 HMAC function on a single-word input: sha256hmac(privatekey,word) = output. The private key length is 128 bits, it does not change. The "word" is literally one short word.  Assuming an attacker knows "word" and "output" for multiple words (e.g., dog = "dsfwrw3r3r323211", cat = "3erwerwetwewer"):   Is it significantly easier for an attacker to identify the private key by brute force with the above word/output pairs, as compared to a situation where they do not have those pairs? Is this brute force vulnerability (with word/output pair knowledge) an actual security concern? How can I remove the white pixels around the edges when exporting a transparent GIF? I took the loaders from  then exported them with the help of the included action to a GIF. But I have some white pixels around the loader which are really annoying when displayed on a dark background. You can see it here, in a frame I extracted from the gif:    How can I prevent those white pixels and maintain the transparent background? Can Reduce *really* not solve for x here? What is object slicing? Someone mentioned it in the IRC as the slicing problem. Recent reports claim that the gravitational waves detected by LIGO match up with the signal expected from two black holes merging as predicted by general relativity.  Additionally, the masses of both black holes were estimated. Questions:  How certain are we that the detected of gravitational waves are necessarily from two black holes merging?  Since supermassive black holes are typically at the center of a host galaxy, what happened to the galaxies that contained the two merging black holes?  For example, did their host galaxies merge?    Edit After reading the answers, I understand that the signals detected by LIGO are proof of the validity of gravitational wave generational artifacts as predicted by general relativity.  When additionally gravitational waves, caused by the merger of the supermassive black holes (those which ARE indeed located in the centers of the merging galaxies) will be detected, since mergers of galaxies could be observed by the methods independent of gravitational waves such as registering the fact of the quasar appearance (). Additional questions:  Could someone offer me the historical ASTRONOMY precedent when the second degree of inference (from the mathematical model, being associated with the theory of Physics) was accepted as the discovery of the astronomical object?  Could someone give a reference to trustable scientific publication, with the subject of study being discussion of requirements satisfying claim of astronomical discovery of an astronomical object?  Have independent scientific sources (outside of members of the LIGO team) analyzed methodology and results of the LIGO signal detection, and published their conclusions with regards of what was actually discovered? Any javascript event occurring when user clicks Stop load button? I recently installed an SSD and AFAIK Ubuntu makes a weekly FSTrim on SSD's that support it.  Is there a log file of this trims? Reading shapefile using C#? I really can't understand what Leonard Susskind means when he says in the video  that information is indestructible.  Is that information that is lost, through the increase of entropy really recoverable?   He himself said that entropy is hidden information. Then, although the information hidden has measurable effects, I think information lost in an irreversible process cannot be retrieved. However, Susskind's claim is quite the opposite. How does one understand the loss of information by an entropy increasing process, and its connection to the statement “information is indestructible”.  Black hole physics can be used in answers, but, as he proposes a general law of physics, I would prefer an answer not involving black holes. I found this very amusing comic on the internet the other day:   The last frame seems to claim that the harmonic series converges if you throw out all the terms with a $9$ in the denominator. Is this true? Where could I find a proof? Is it only true for terms with a $9$ or is it true for any number? If it's only true for $9$, why is that? "Unable to locate package" while trying to install packages with APT I have the problem, that PHP replaces all spaces with underscores in POST and GET variables. For example if I have the URL: http://localhost/proxy.php?user name=Max the browser will convert it to http://localhost/proxy.php?user%20name=Max. But if I give the $_GET parameters out, the key is not user name but user_name (note the underscore)! Is there any possibility to change this behaviour?