when i press the mirror modifer nothing happens to my shape im a noob at blender so could someone please help? i've tried all other solutions that related to my post but none of them worked.
I'm learning how to use the mirror modifier and I am having some trouble.  When I apply the modifier to my object I don't see a mirrored version of it.  What am I doing wrong?
When the phrase is used as an object, why so many native speakers are saying "you and I" instead of "you and me"? I'm not a native speaker but I thought "you and me" is correct. Not sure if this falls into the same category, but "Just between you and me" sounds more natural than "Just between you and I". How to fix apt: Signature by key uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1)? I started setting up by adding repositories and then went to run a sudo apt-get update again before I started installing other software, and I get the Signature key lines and it stops. So it essentially won't let me update any packages now.  d@EliteBook:~/Downloads$ sudo apt-get update Ign:1 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease Hit:2 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable Release                      Hit:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease               Get:5 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease [247 kB] Hit:6 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease Hit:7 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease Fetched 247 kB in 0s (256 kB/s)                    Reading package lists... Done W: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release.gpg: Signature by  key 4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1) d@EliteBook:~/Downloads$   I've never seen this before whenever I setup and start installing things in Ubuntu. Is there something else I can do? How to create a separate subnet for wireless access? I need to configure my wireless router so all wireless devices are on a different subnet (192.168.2.1).  The wireless devices should be able to access the internet, but ideally not the workstations on the LAN.  Here is my network:    All suggestions welcome! I want to know if there is another way to solve the equation:  $$(x+1)^y-x^z=1$$  for positive integers $x,y,z$ greater than $1$ without using the Catalan identity. Does exist? By now I only know that $x\mid y$. Can I manually limit the %CPU used by a process? How can we move an object with zero velocity? Consider there is a box of mass $m$ at rest on the floor. Most books give an example that we need to do a work of $mgh$ to lift the box $h$ upward.  If we analyze this work done, the external force acting on the box by us should be equal to the weight of the box. Therefore the net force is zero which in turn there is no acceleration. If there is no acceleration and the initial velocity of the box is also zero, how can the box move upward? Compact way to assign values by slicing list in Python How much of 32-bit support is dropped in macOS Catalina? macOS Catalina is said to have dropped support for 32-bit apps. It’s not clear how much support is dropped.   Is there any supported way for a 64-bit app to request the kernel to create a 32-bit code segment? select all rows with a minimum value How does one solve the matrix equation $AX+XB=C$ for $X$? It doesn't seem too difficult. I tried many times but failed.  I'm an adult student... I am now vexed about Gilbert Strang - An Introduction to Linear Algebra. I don't even understand a single word in Wikipedia: . If you have ever use some nice workable materials or lecture notes? You can generously upload and share the links of the lecture notes and assignments. Different subjects/ topics are welcome, as long as you deem they are nice and workable.   The problem origins from a system of diff equation, using undetermined coefficients (matrix) to find the particular solution. Try $y_p=X\begin{pmatrix}   e^{\alpha t} \\ e^{\beta t} \end{pmatrix}$  $\dot{y}+Ay=C\begin{pmatrix} e^{\alpha t} \\ e^{\beta t}\end{pmatrix}$   $\dot{y_p}=X\begin{pmatrix} \alpha &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; \beta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}e^{\alpha t} \\ e^{\beta t}\end{pmatrix}$  substitute $\dot{y_p}$ and $y_p$ into the original differential equation..  $X\begin{pmatrix} \alpha &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; \beta \end{pmatrix}+AX=C$ One Time Pad Key Distribution For multiple OTP keys, why not do this:  Key = Hash[(EC)DH Shared Secret + Counter]  The counter will increase per message, and the output of the hash will be random for each new unique input into it. What are the problems or weaknesses with this design??  EDIT: For clarification: both parties will have the shared secret from an ECDH exchange, random numbers from Pythons os.urandom for generating the ECC key Why is list initialization (using curly braces) better than the alternatives? Why are integer literals with leading zeroes interpreted strangely? This prints 83  System.out.println(0123)   However this prints 123  System.out.println(123)   Why does it work that way? How do I convert a light circuit with a single pole switch to use two 3-way switches? I have a box in the hall which includes a 3-way switch (with another switch at the other end of the hall), a single pole switch to the garage lights and a single pole switch to the exterior lights on the garage.  The single pole switch to the garage is wired with a 3 wire plus ground. The white and black wires feed the garage lights from the switch and the red wire feeds the garage ceiling outlets and is hot all the time.  In the garage I would like to add a 3-way switch for the garage lights and another 3-way switch for the exterior garage lights.  In other words I would like to be able to turn on both of those light locations from both the inside hall and the garage as well. I know that I will of course have to replace the existing single pole switches in the hall with 3-way switches and add a junction box in the garage with 2 3-way switches in it.  The thing that I don't know is what wiring connections I need to make.  Can you help? optimality of the Carnot cycle I found an argument online that the two fields are not isomorphic but I can't make sense of the argument. You find it .  These are the things I'm confused about when it comes to the argument.     It says that the field $\mathbb Q[x]/(x^2+1)$ contains a root of the polynomial $x^2+1$. I suppose this is the congruence class $[x]$? But this is not the same as the zero element of the field $\mathbb Q[x]/(x^2+1)$, right?   It says that every isomorfism takes $0$ to $0$. I interpret this as the zero-element in $\mathbb Q[x]/(x^2+1)$ (which I interpret to be $[0]$) is taken to the zero-element in $\mathbb Q[x]/(x^2+2)$ denoted $[0]_2$. But in the argument it says that this means that if $\mathbb Q[x]/(x^2+1)$ has a root of the polynomial, then also $\mathbb Q[x]/(x^2+2)$ must have a root of this same polynomial. Why is that?     Greatful for any help! How to make text file created in Ubuntu compatible with Windows Notepad? Sometime I have to use the text files created in Ubuntu, using editors, in Windows editors. So basically when ever I create a text file in Ubuntu I append the extension .txt, and it does make the file open in Windows very easily.  But the actual problem is the text files created in Ubuntu are so difficult to understand (read) when opened in Windows' Notepad. No matter how many lines have been used, all the lines appear in the same one line.  Is there a easy way to save the text files in Ubuntu's basic editors so that it can be seen exactly the same in Windows' notepad? I'm talking about this nonsense:   Now, I'm aware that there are problems with the practicalities (or possibilities) of methods involving exotic matter with negative mass, and that kind of thing has been addressed here:   But in this case my question is different and more specific. Sweeping all the other problems of constructing such a beast under the rug, wouldn't this violate causality?  SR says that the simultaneity and relative ordering of events is dependent on the relative motion of the observer, but that no matter how it works out, if event A causes event B, no observer will see B first. One of the many problems with FTL travel (or signals) is that if any information is sent faster than light, there will exist an inertial frame in which the signal arrives before it is sent, a blatant violation of causality. (I think we can all agree, can we not, that the threshold should be extremely high before breaking assumptions that we're in a causal universe?)  So how is any scheme to travel faster than light, even if it may locally satisfy the equations of GR, not a blatant violation causality according to SR?  Is my understanding of GR incomplete and there's something in it that obviates the causality implications of SR? Or am I correct that FTL claims should be dismissed with extreme prejudice on this basis alone? (Pending a serious replicable experiment showing causality to be breakable.) I searched around, and currently there are two methods suggested; installing an enhancement for Windows Subsystem for Linux and installing an XServer.  I want to know which method is the most hassle-free (easy to install AND to use), and which one is less memory-heavy.  I just want Synaptic and CMake. Why couldn't that be a builtin feature? Orthogonal basis for infinite-dimensional vector spaces