anybody know how to handle an anchor like this? i redirect from another page to the page with these anchor items    i want to set   1 - 9009bac1153753cf6741eda10bc03121  2 - ZJJNkHQ2  3 - 95.26336735469833  4 - 1661  and get these values on the page to set them automatically in input boxes.
I know on client side (javascript) you can use windows.location.hash but could not find anyway to access from the server side. I'm using asp.net.
What's the best way to check if a file exists in C? How can you find and replace text in a file using the Windows command-line environment? From the  on the dual of a norm:  $X$ and $Y$ are normed spaces, and we associate with each $f\in L(X,Y)$ (the space of bounded linear operators from $X$ to $Y$) the number $$\|f\| = \sup\{|f(x)|:x\in X, \|x\| \leq 1\}.$$  At some point in the proof that $L(X,Y)$ is bounded, it seems like they use the inequality $$\|fx\| \leq \|f\|\cdot\|x\|,$$ where $\|x\|\leq 1$.  I can't see why this should holds.   $\|f|\|$ is the supremum of what $|f(x)|$ can be, given that $\|x\|\leq 1$. So, given that $\|x\| \leq 1$, $|fx|$ should be bounded by $\|f\|$. But why should it be bounded by $\|f\|\cdot\|x\|$? How are the degrees of freedom in the emmeans package calculated? - R I'd say Microsoft have a way of bending the rules and I know that McLaren have won the championship. While this sounds strange, I believe it is correct English (sorry, I'm not native).   But when it's a small company, would you still use it this way? Is a company always plural, or are small companies singular? I.e., would you say Bakery Johnson makes fine bread or Bakery Johnson make fine bread? Is it My book seller, Woody's, have moved or is it has moved? Can you create images like this:    when you have something like  0 = green (#54ff00) 1 = white (#ffffff) 2 = red   (#ff0000) 3 = blue  (#0048ff)  Image (Python list of integers defined above): [[2,0,0,0,0,0,0],  [0,3,0,0,0,0,0],  [0,3,2,1,1,0,0],  [0,3,2,2,2,1,1],  [0,3,2,0,0,1,0],  [0,0,0,0,0,1,0],  [0,0,0,0,0,1,0]]   with TikZ?  How far I got  The following MWE defines all colors, produces a grid of the correct size (though the size is determined by hand):  \documentclass[varwidth=true, border=2pt]{standalone} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{xcolor}  \begin{document}     \newcommand\n{7}     \definecolor{green}{HTML}{54FF00}     \definecolor{wite}{HTML}{FFFFFF}     \definecolor{red}{HTML}{FF0000}     \definecolor{blue}{HTML}{0048FF}     \begin{tikzpicture}         \foreach \x in {1,...,\n}{             \foreach \y in {1,...,\n}{                 \begin{scope}[shift={(\x,\y)}]                   \draw [fill=green] (0,0) rectangle (1,1);                 \end{scope}             }         }     \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   Of course, I could simpy make a lot of adjusted                   \begin{scope}[shift={(\x,\y)}]                   \draw [fill=green] (0,0) rectangle (1,1);                 \end{scope}   but I've wondered if this can (with reasonable effort) be done in TikZ / LaTeX.  My problem is giving TikZ the color array. I don't have any idea how to do this. I only know two types of looks in TikZ:  \foreach \x in {0,1,2,3,4,5}{...} \foreach \number in {1,...,\n}{...}   I have never seen a nested over a 2D-array. All I have seen so far were 1D-Arrays of tuples (with fixed tuple size). How can I prevent inline math formulas from overflowing into the margin? When I compile my document in LaTeX, some formulas in the document in math mode, between $ $, go into the right margin area beyond all the text.  Is there a way to fix this aesthetic problem? Birational map from elliptic curve keeps smoothness? Let $E$ be a elliptic curve that is , genus $1$ smooth curve with base point. And suppose that the map $φ$, which sends $E$ to $E'$, is birational. Birational means there are two rational maps on both direction which composites identity. Then, can we say that $E'$ is smooth? Tikz, Tree without overlaps I'm trying to get a nice tree without the overlaps, can anyone help me to improve my code?  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{dsfont} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{shapes} \usetikzlibrary{graphs}  \begin{document}       \begin{tikzpicture}[baseline,level/.style={level distance=20mm, sibling distance =35mm/#1},scale=1]         \node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}             child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                 child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                     child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                     child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                         child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                         child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                             child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                             child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                         }                     }                 }                    child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                     child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                         child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                         child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                             child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                             child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                                 child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                                 child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                             }                         }                     }                     child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                         child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                         child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                             child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                             child{ node [ellipse split, draw] {$s_1&lt;s_2$\nodepart{lower}\tiny $(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}                                 child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                                 child{ node [rectangle, draw] {$(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)$}}                             }                         }                     }                 }             };     \end{tikzpicture} \end{document} libpng problems for QGIS I'm using ubuntu 18.04 and if I download QGIS 2.18 and I try to run it, I get this:  libpng warning: Application jmp_buf size changed Segmentation fault (core dumped)   If I try with QGIS 3.2, the error is:   libpng warning: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.6.34 libpng warning: Application  is  running with png.c from libpng-1.2.56 libpng error: Incompatible libpng version in application and library   So it's clear that the problem is with libpng.   I purged libpng-dev and reinstall again but nothing changed.   I tried to purge libpng16-16 but I get:  sudo apt purge libpng16-16 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation:  The following packages have unmet dependencies:  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 : Depends: libpng16-16 (&gt;= 1.6.2-1) but it is not going to be installed                       Recommends: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-bin  libgtk-3-0 : Depends: libcairo-gobject2 (&gt;= 1.10.0) but it is not going to be installed               Depends: libcairo2 (&gt;= 1.14.0) but it is not going to be installed               Depends: libfontconfig1 (&gt;= 2.12) but it is not going to be installed               Depends: libpango-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.40.5) but it is not going to be installed               Depends: libpangocairo-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.40.5) but it is not going to be installed               Depends: libpangoft2-1.0-0 (&gt;= 1.40.5) but it is not going to be installed               Depends: adwaita-icon-theme               Recommends: libgtk-3-bin E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.   and then:  ~$ sudo apt install libgdk-pixbuf2.0-bin libgtk-3-bin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done libgdk-pixbuf2.0-bin is already the newest version (2.36.11-2). libgtk-3-bin is already the newest version (3.22.30-1ubuntu1). 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. ~$ sudo apt install libgtk-3-0 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree        Reading state information... Done libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 is already the newest version (2.36.11-2). libgtk-3-0 is already the newest version (3.22.30-1ubuntu1). 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.   At this point I'm afraid of breaking something if I continue trying things, so I come here for advice before.  I deleted and reinstalled ubuntu. I installed first thing qgis and it was working. Afterwards I compiled gdal, from source to have it from python as stand alone. It might be this, but I had done this previously without any problems. Does an adjective or longer modifier apply to both nouns when they are joined with 'and' [or 'or']? Which standard objects don't support triggers? Titles of articles I'm about to cite contain upper case letters and when using BibTeX it converts them to lower case ones. This happens only in the title and only the first letter conserves its case. For example, when I cite an article about HF, the reader won't know if it is about Hafnium (Hf) or fluorine acid (HF).  I know that I can fix it manually in the .bbl file but I would like to avoid it, or fix it automatically. What exactly do quotation marks around the table name do? I thought that the quotation mark (") was simply a type of grouping marker but I'm debugging some NHibernate code and notice that while  SELECT * FROM site WHERE site_id = 3;   Works fine  SELECT * FROM "site" WHERE site_id = 3;   fails with a table or view does not exist error.  What gives? Is there a single word that describes both Witches and Wizards? In the Harry Potter world, there's the term "muggle" for people with no magical abilities, "muggle-born" for those with magical abilities who's parents are muggles and "squib" for those with no magical abilities who's parents are magical.  But is there any collective term for all magical people (as opposed to wizards for males and witches for females)?  I don't recall seeing any word that refers to all men and women and children with magical abilities, and it's the only group left without noun or collective noun to describe them. Why must fermions be antisymmetric? I have read that fermions cannot exist in the same state simultaneously. I understand why indistinguishable particles with an antisymmetric superposition of states can't exist in the same state simultaneously, but why must fermions have an antisymmetric superposition of states?  The only characterising property I know of fermions having besides antisymmetry is spin, for which they have half-integer. I understand that this is the case simply because particles with half-integer spin and particles with zero or integer spin were defined as fermions and bosons respectively.  My perusal of the Wikipedia page on the  leaves me under the impression that spin has nothing to do with the wavefunction's symmetry properties:     Naively, neither has anything to do with the spin, which determines the rotation properties of the particles, not the exchange properties.   Are antisymmetric wavefunctions simply classified as fermions, in the way half-integer spin particles were? I don't see how this could be the case, as, if spin and symmetry were independent, half-integer spin particles with symmetric wavefunctions (and antisymmetric integer spin particles) would be possible. How can I get maximum DoF with no distance markers? I am aware of what hyperfocal distance is and the general principles behind it. However, most of the tutorials I have seen and read regarding it make use of lenses with focus distance indicators. Unfortunately, neither of my lenses (Nikkor 18-55mm &amp; 35mm f1.8) have indicators.  I have read that you can 'cheat' and simply focus a third of the way into the shot (which I have done previously simply by spot-focusing on the lowest focus point in my VF). I also assume you could pace out the distance and note an object to focus on when you get back to the camera (though that might be easier said than done).  Does anyone have any suggestions on how to achieve maximum sharpness from front to back without focus distance markers. A new lens is not an option; global economic crisis and all that! Word for "scary thing that's about to occur"? I have the feeling I'm forgetting a very simple word. But anyway, is there a word for that? Example:     The [...] that haven't occurred yet are the most scary ones. Book Recommendation for mathematical finance Does anyone know a book which covers topics on:  Brownian Motion   Martingales   Stochastic Calculus  Stochastic Differential Equations   Options pricing. Black-Scholes model  Fundamental Theorems. Interest Rates   Random Walk   Applications in Insurance   Simulations. Convergence   Simulation methods   I would like something in-depth, but at an undergraduate level. Using proof by contradiction vs proof of the contrapositive What is the difference between a "proof by contradiction" and "proving the contrapositive"? Intuitive, it feels like doing the exact same thing. And when I compare an exercise, one person proves by contradiction, and the other proves the contrapositive, the proofs look almost exactly the same.  For example, say I want to prove: $P \implies Q$ When I want to prove by contradiction, I would say assume this is not true. Assume $Q$ is not true, and $P$ is true. Blabla, but this implies $P$ is not true, which is a contradiction.  When I want to prove the contrapositive, I say. Assume $Q$ is not true. Blabla, this implies $P$ is not true.  The only difference in the proof is that I assume $P$ is true in the beginning, when I want to prove by contradiction. But this feels almost redundant, as in the end I always get that this is not true. The only other way that I could get a contradiction is by proving that $Q$ is true. But this would be the exact same things as a direct proof.   Can somebody enlighten me a little bit here ? For example: Are there proofs that can be proven by contradiction but not proven by proving the contrapositve?