If I generate a Normal and leptokurtotic continuous probability distribution (pdf), how can I measure the mass of these pdf's? If both pdf's have the same number of sample observations, but obviously have different statistical moments, can we expect that the area/mass that these two distributions enclose be different or identical to one another? How does the concept of pdf mass compare to the concepts and estimation of pdf moments and shape?
If we minimize the Wasserstein loss, $$W_1 (P_S, P_T) = \underset{\gamma \in \Pi}{\text{min }} \sum_{x,y} |x-y|\gamma(x,y)$$ which means we are looking for the coupling $\gamma(x,y)$ that minimizes the cost of moving mass from the source distribution $P_S$ to the target distribution $P_T$,  Do the masses of the source and target distributions have to be identical? If so or not, how are the masses of $P_T$ and $P_S$ accounted for mathematically in, or when minimizing, the shown formula, or what might be missing/overlooked by the Wasserstein approach overall due to the mass differences?
The question is if you have a situation where one of the singular values is equal to 0 in a singular value decomposition of a matrix, how to do you procede to find the column vector of U corresponding to this singular value?   Usually I found the columns of U with this relation, so let's say that we refer to $\vec{u_2}$ as the U column vector corresponding to singular value equal to 0:  $\vec{u_2} = (1/s_2)Av_2$  Now the as we can see the 0 is in an illegal place, since you can't divide by zero. But if you move it to the left side, I still can't quite see how to find the column of U corresponding to it. Any suggestions?  Here is an example of a matrix that provided this specific challenge  $ A = \left(\begin{array}{rrr} -3 &amp; 1 \\ 6 &amp; -2 \\ 6 &amp; -2 \end{array}\right). $  $ \lambda{_1} = 90$,  $\lambda{_2} = 0$,  $s_1 = 3 \sqrt{10}$,  $s_2 = 0$,  How can one find $\vec{v_2}$ when $\lambda{_2} = 0$? In this case, you know that the eigenvectors of $A^{t} A$ are orthogonal, solve for $\lambda{_2}$ and find the eigenvector if it's orthogonal to the eigenvector corresponding to the first eigenvalue you have your solution.  So we end up with the following normalized column vectors for V, which we can see are orthogonal:  $ \vec{v_1} = \left(\begin{array}{rrr} -3/\sqrt{10} \\ 1/\sqrt{10} \\ \end{array}\right). $  $ \vec{v_2} = \left(\begin{array}{rrr} 1/\sqrt{10} \\ 3/\sqrt{10} \\ \end{array}\right). $ Storing two kinds of point geometry in shapefile or creating multipoint shapefiles? Following , can I have a mixture of two kinds of geometry in a shapefile of type point. Just like I have about shapefiles of type polygon or I should always create a shapefile of type multipoint in order to support multipoints in my layer?    My problem is as you see at , I can't use ogrinfo in order to understand that the geometry type of a multipoint shapefile will be known as wkbMultipoint or wkbPointwhen I use this line of code:    OGRwkbGeometryType GeometryType = poLayer -&gt;GetGeomType();     for a layer of type multipoint before programming.     Will OGR know a layer of type multipoint as wkbpoint or wkbmultipoint?   When we create a shapefile in ArcCatalog, we have point and multipoint, but not multipolyline or multipolygon for polyline and polygon.Why? threeparttablex table notes for tabu tabulars with less than \textwidth Do gravitational waves slow down as they pass through matter? I've heard that gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, and have some parallels to electromagnetic waves.  EM waves slow down as they pass through matter (speed of light in glass is slower than in vacuum, for instance).  Do gravitational waves also slow down as they pass through matter?  If so, are there any effects like  when matter passes through a medium at a speed greater than the velocity of gravity in that medium?  Do large masses like stars or Jupiter act as ball lenses for gravitational waves? Given that , I wonder if every intelligent biological species is capable of producing beings that are Force-Sensitive?   Or are there some species characteristics that can make it 100% impossible for them ever to produce a Force-sensitive individual.  NOTE: Let's exclude - if they exist in EU - things like random new-species-creating mutations - e.g. the individual should be 100% the same species, able to interbreed. Is it safe to check floating point values for equality to 0? I know you can't rely on equality between double or decimal type values normally, but I'm wondering if 0 is a special case.  While I can understand imprecisions between 0.00000000000001 and 0.00000000000002, 0 itself seems pretty hard to mess up since it's just nothing.  If you're imprecise on nothing, it's not nothing anymore.  But I don't know much about this topic so it's not for me to say.  double x = 0.0; return (x == 0.0) ? true : false;   Will that always return true? How to prove this for positive real numbers? $$a+b+c\leq\frac{a^3}{bc}+\frac{b^3}{ca}+\frac{c^3}{ab}$$  I tried AM-GM, CS inequality but all failed. How to delete Windows.old in Windows 8 It seems to be a common thing that a Windows Update creates a Windows.old folder under C:\Windows.old My question is now, can it be deleted with Windows 8 and how can I do that?  If I try to manually delete it in Windows Explorer it does not let me, a permissions issue. Whenever I'm running or playing a game, I consistently run into an issue of setting atmosphere. I've realized the best way to do this is through more effective, engaging descriptions of settings, actions, and objects that the characters see and feel.  As a player, I feel that my actions are generally "I attack the goblin," or some variation thereof, but I'm afraid that I'll stumble over my words and further confuse the other players and I'll resort to "I attack the goblin" as to not drag the game out longer.  As a DM, my issue tends to be more with setting atmosphere with settings, locations, and objects. Effectively, the flavor texts that comes with walking into some amazing location that the characters (not necessarily the players) should be suitably impressed by. My goal here is to engage the players with some degree of spectacle, and be more inquisitive in their environment and whatever lies within it.  How can I create more descriptive, concise flavor text for the games I play in? Why are all the textures in my file pink? When should a supervisor be an author? I understand that in a lot of big-lab fields it is common for the principal investigator to append their name to a paper even if they did not write the paper, design the experiment, or collect data since they spend energy securing funding, and managing the whole lab. What about for small labs?  What are the requirements for a supervisor to be included as an author on a paper, as opposed to just appearing in the acknowledgements? If you are working on your own projects independently of your supervisor, but using funding provided by your supervisor (how does this change when the funding provides resources versus just your salary), are you suppose to add them as authors or just acknowledge the source of funding? Are there any valid reasons to not rollover a former 401(k) when changing jobs?  I have several little ones that I never quite got around to rolling together - with an upcoming job change, should they all be combined into my new employer's retirement plan?  If not, what else might be considered? Are there expected dressing norms at faculty interviews? Will a casual tee-jeans be discouraged?  In the same vein, what is expected when a student visits the campus for an interview? Operation 'Split, All The Metas!' Shall Commence On April 16, 2014 Update 2014-04-17 04:47 UTC: Stable, with some odds and ends to clean up      The main MSO/MSE sites are stable, but there are plenty of corners left to sweep. For details, see:    Not all of them mind you, just Meta Stack Overflow into Meta Stack Exchange.  I'll have you know, factually, that we really did believe this would take place in six-to-eight weeks when it was , but we've finally got a tentative date established.  If things go according to plan, we'll begin the operation shortly after 8:30 PM EDT on the 16th, completing everything within a few hour window. Ideally, all service disrupting endeavors will be completed within the first hour, which include:   The availability of Meta Stack Overflow The availability of Stack Overflow (more on this shortly) The availability of Chat on Meta Stack Overflow   As you know, we'll be bolting on a standard issue per-site meta on Stack Overflow, while breaking the link between what will have become Meta Stack Exchange and Stack Overflow. There's some irritable innards in that particular region, so we'll be asking folks to expect the unexpected during the maintenance window. Affected sites will be in and out of read-only mode, or quite possibly just down for maintenance while we're doing the actual break.  I'll be posting a system message on both Meta Stack Overflow as well as Stack Overflow itself 24 hours before we begin the actual work.   Did I say tentative in a six-to-eight-something time frame again? Why yes, I did - we're currently running some tests on the dev tier to simulate the split as closely as possible, so that we can better anticipate quirks that we need to address prior to actually doing it.  Once the sites have actually been stood up functionally on the production tier, we're going to get to work on finishing touches. This will include things like site settings (which determine bits of text you see in the question prompts, rep thresholds, etc) and all sorts of other fine tuning.  Once we're done:   Stack Overflow will have a blank, empty child meta site just like every other site The new Meta Stack Exchange will be up and running All rooms on Chat Meta Stack Overflow will be moved to Chat Meta Stack Exchange  I'll send over about 150 - 200 questions from MSE to MSO, most of which will be tag or SO-specific feature related posts that got buried by the network stuff without resolution.   If the tentative date moves, I'll update this post with the new date. However, we do not anticipate this happening any later than Saturday, April 19 - in the case that we see down time we can't mitigate and need to do it on a weekend.  The ground work is basically done, we're finishing up sanity now with a great deal of confidence, and we're pretty certain that we'll hit between those dates, if not directly on the tentative 16th.  Questions? Kvetch? Anonymous confessions? Answer below, and I'll address each in comments. In the C and C++ programming languages, what is the difference between using angle brackets and using quotes in an include statement, as follows?   #include &lt;filename&gt;  #include "filename" When is $2^n \pm 1$ a perfect power Is there an easy way of showing that $2^n \pm 1$ is never a perfect power, except for $2^3 + 1 = 3^2 $?  I know that   gives the result directly, but I'm hopefully for a more elementary method.    I can show that it is never a square, except for $2^3 + 1$.  Proof: Cases $n=1, 2, 3$ are easily dealt with. Henceforth, let $n\geq4$.  $2^n -1 \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$ hence is never a square.     If $2^n +1 =x^2$, then $2^n = (x-1)(x+1)$ and both of these are powers of 2. Thus we must have $(x-1) = 2, (x+1) = 4$. This gives the solution of $2^3 + 1 = 3^2$.    Let's now do an odd prime.  Say $2^n +1 = x^p$. Then $2^n = x^p - 1 = (x-1)(x^{p-1}+x^{p-2} + \ldots +1)$, so both terms are powers of 2. We have $ x = 2^m+1$ is odd. But the other term is the sum of $p$ odd numbers, hence is odd. Since this is clearly greater than 1, we get a contradiction.  Say $2^n -1 = x^p$. Then $2^n = x^p + 1 = (x+1)(x^{p-1} - x^{p-2} + \ldots -x +1 )$, so both terms are powers of 2. We have $x = 2^m -1$ is odd. But the other term is the sum of $p$ odd numbers, hence is odd. Since $x^p + 1 \neq x+1$ except for $p=1$, this means that the term is greater than 1. Hence we get a contradiction. Generated $\sigma$-algebras with cylinder set doesn't contain the space of continuous functions Why is everybody so concerned about etc/passwd? I've tried to import but I don't see the (.max) file as an option when importing. Is there another way to import the 3DMax model into Blender for rigging and animation? Use central limit to solve a problem I am asked to solve the following question using central limit theorem. In an election between two candidates, A and B, one million individuals cast theirvote. Among these, 2000 know candidate A from her election campaign and vote unanimously for her.The remaining 998000 voters are undecided and make their decision independently of each other byflipping a fair coin.Approximate the probability pA that candidate A wins up to 3 significant figures.  It's easy to solve directly. PA = $\frac{0.5(10000-2000)+2000}{10000}$ = 0.501. However, I am quite confused about how to solve this problem by central limit theorem.