Did anyone come up with an answer to this question ()?
I'm looking for a good, consistent and easy way to do a report of sudoers permissions for every user and group on the system. For users, I want the report to include permissions granted via group membership.
Question on groups of order $pq$ Exclude a view from master layout? Where do you go for the 'nearest railroad' in Monopoly? In the American edition of Monopoly, there is a Chance card that says:  Advance token to nearest railroad Pay owner twice the rental to which he/she is entitled. If railroad is unowned, you may buy it from the bank.   However, is this the closest railroad, or the next one? If you are standing on the Chance spot in the light blues, do you go all around the board to Reading, which is the closest to you, or do you go to Pennsylvania, which is the first one you land on? Problem: A lot of the time I downvote something that clearly shows lack of research or effort on OP's part, and when they edit to improve it, I usually find out pretty late, because there are no notifications to help with that.  Proposition: add a Get notified when this post is edited button/checkbox under a post which you have downvoted (per post, not just all posts ever), so that if there is a significant improvement, you could remove your downvote or even change it to an upvote to show you recognize the improvement.  I believe this would improve public thinking about votes, and make people (who choose to participate like this on the SE sites more often) vote more freely and more often, and everybody else would not think of a &lt;0 post score as a death sentence for their contribution.  I'm not asking to enable this on SO (for a number of obvious reasons), and that's why I propose an opt-in subscription. This would be most useful on lower activity sites like the SE, in my opinion, but who knows.    I want to know if someone has improved their post after a downvote to reinforce the positive behavior and I get -4 on my good intentions? What kind of culture are you trying to cultivate? Please, explain why you disagree without silently downvoting. If you think there's a better way, yes, I want to know your thoughts. I know that we shouldn't being using the registry to store Application Data anymore, but in updating a Legacy application (and wanting to do the fewest changes), what Registry Hives are non-administrators allowed to use?    Can I access all of HKEY_CURRENT_USER (the application currently access HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE) without Administrator privileges? Disable the default app key (super+num) functionality on Ubuntu 17.10 and later I like to switch workspaces via Super+Number. But unfortunately the default behavior in Ubuntu for Super+Number is to select applications from the dock.   Is it possible to disable that functionality? I've tried overriding the keyboard shortcuts but it doesn't appear to be working. Implicit conversion issue in a ternary condition Not booting from USB or CD (SYSLINUX Message) conflict between hyperref and enumitem packages (and \refstepcounter) The solution outlined for each of the following two posts appears to conflict with the hyperref package.         Here is a MWE.  The desired output for the example is  1. Outer 2.1. This is line 2.1, in block 2.  2.2. Inner again 3. Outer again 4. Let’s end here   This output is indeed produced by the LaTeX source below, but if I uncomment the \usepackage{hyperref} line in the header, LaTeX gives me an error just after the \skipitem command, as described in the inline comment below:  \documentclass{article}  % \usepackage{hyperref} % if we uncomment the above line, we get an error as described below  \usepackage{enumitem}  \newlist{steps}{enumerate}{9} \setlist[steps]{itemindent=0pt} \setlist[steps,1]{label=\arabic*.,ref=\arabic*} \setlist[steps,2]{label=\arabic{stepsi}.\arabic*.,ref=\arabic{stepsi}.\arabic*}  \makeatletter \newcommand{\skipitem}{\refstepcounter{\@enumctr}} \makeatother  \begin{document} \begin{steps} \item Outer   \skipitem   % If we uncomment the \usepackage{hyperref} line in the header,   % we get the following error after the \skipitem above   %    % ./tmp.tex:20: Missing number, treated as zero.   % &lt;to be read again&gt;    %   \c@0.0ptxcii    % l.20   \skipitem   % \item[] \label{blockA}   \label{blockA}\item[]   \begin{steps}   \item\label{lineB} This is line~\ref{lineB}, in block~\ref{blockA}.   \item Inner again   \end{steps} \item Outer again \item Let's end here \end{steps}  \end{document}   Can someone help me work around this conflict, so I can use hyperref with this use of enumitems and refstepcounter?  Thanks.  (Note: smaller working examples are possible, but they give different error messages.  I'm hoping to get the current example working.) Is it "I" or "me" in "Keep Tom and I/me updated"? In this case what is correct?        Keep Tom and I updated.      or         Keep Tom and me updated.      I understand that me is an object pronoun. And therefore I feel the second option is correct.  Especially, because I would say "Keep him updated" and also "Keep me updated". Instead of "Keep he updated" or "Keep I updated". But something about saying "Keep him and me updated" feels wrong.  However I am not sure, because several people have told me that in this case I is the correct option because it is being used in conjunction with a name (Tom) and not a pronoun. Is that correct? Compactness of $\operatorname{Spec}(A)$ In an exercise in Atiyah-Macdonald it asks to prove that the prime spectrum $\operatorname{Spec}(A)$ of a commutative ring $A$ as a topological space $X$ (with the Zariski Topology) is compact.   Now because the basic open sets $X_f = \{\mathfrak{p} \in \operatorname{Spec} (A) : \{f\} \not\subseteq \mathfrak{p} \}$ form a basis for the Zariski Topology it suffices to consider the case when   $$X = \bigcup_{i \in I} X_{f_i}$$   where $I$ is some index set. Then taking the complement on both sides we get that   $$\emptyset = \bigcap_{i \in I} X_{f_i}^c$$  so there is no prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$ of $A$ such that all the $f_i$'s are in $\mathfrak{p}$. Now from here I am able to show that the ideal generated by the $f_i$'s is the whole ring as follows. Since there is no prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$ such that all the $f_i \in \mathfrak{p}$, it is clear that there is no $\mathfrak{p}$ such that $(f_i) \subseteq \mathfrak{p}$ for all $i \in I.$ Taking a sum over all the $i$ then gives $$\sum_{i \in I} (f_i) = (1).$$  Now here's the problem:          How do I show from here that there is an equation of the form $1 = \sum_{i \in J} f_ig_i,$ where $g_i \in A$ and $J$ some finite subset of $I$?       This part has been giving me a headache. I am not sure if the finiteness bit has to do with algebra, topology or the fact that we are dealing with prime ideals.  This is not a homework problem but rather for self-study.  $\textbf{Edit:}$ I have posted my answer below after the discussion with Dylan and Pierre. I am using ArcMap 10.2 and I'm looking for a way to add  a table containing certain fields from select elements from a featureclass to my map. Ive tried the add table option from the attribute table, but it doesn't quite give what I want (the table must be editable to look a certain way).   Are there any options out there for 10.2 like arcpy.mapping.tableview or will upgrading to 10.3 so I can get access to the "graphic table element" function be best? Is it okay to keep flour in the freezer? Years ago I noticed I was getting little bugs in the flour that I kept in the pantry.  To prevent this, I started keeping my flour in the freezer.  I don't do a lot of baking, but I was wondering what effects this might have on anything I do bake.  Do baked goods turn out any differently when flour is kept in the freezer vs flour kept at room temperature?  Also, if it's okay to freeze flour, how long will it last this way? I hope I'm right in thinking this is the site where you post general computer-related problems...  A problem I have when playing games (since you won't be pressing multiple keys simultaneously anytime else), is that when I press up/left and then another key, it fails to 'register' as if that last key is never pressed. This doesn't happen when I'm pressing any other two arrow keys, e.g. down/left or up/right. The weird thing is that when I'm playing with WASD instead of the arrow keys, i still have this problem! Meaning W+A+another button doesn't work.  If anyone knows what I should, I'd appreciate the help. (My reflexes are fast and I can always circumvent this problem, but it's quite annoying and shouldn't exist to begin with!) When there are several cottages each with several tariffs (depending on the season), should the plural be "cottage tariffs" or "cottages tariffs"?  For context, this is to be a section title on a website renting out the cottages.  An explanation of the grammatical rules would be helpful. What font is "z" in "z-score"? I have TeX Live 2013 installed via MacTeX on my Snow Leopard laptop.  I copied the following code from page 247 of version 2.10 of pgfmanual:  \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{report} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{decorations}  \begin{document}  \begin{tikzpicture} \node (a) {A}; \node (b) at (2,1) {B}; \draw (a) -- (b); \draw[decorate,decoration=brace] (a) -- (b); \draw[decorate,decoration={brace,mirror},red] (a) -- (b); \draw[decorate,decoration={brace,mirror,raise=5pt},blue] (a) -- (b); \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document}   Yet somehow I get this error:  ./Untitled2.tex:11: Package pgfkeys Error: I do not know the key '/pgf/decorati on/brace' and I am going to ignore it. Perhaps you misspelled it.  See the pgfkeys package documentation for explanation. Type  H &lt;return&gt;  for immediate help.  ...                                                l.11 \draw[decorate,decoration=brace]                                       (a) -- (b); ?    Is this a bug? Proof of $\pi$ not being a quadratic irrational number. Does someone know a proof (books, articles) that $\pi$ is not a quadratic irrational?   The proof should not use that $\pi$ is transcendental.  Any hints would be appreciated. Prove F test is equal to T test squared I need to show that F test is equal to T test squared, when the T test is for 2 independent groups and assuming variances are equal.  I know that $F=\frac{MSB}{MSW}=\frac{SSB/k-1}{SSW/N-K}$ and I know that $T=\frac{X-Y}{S_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{m}}}$,   so $T^2=\frac{(X-Y)^2}{S_p^2 ({\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{m}})}$  I've seen this proof in Regression but here we're not using MSE and MSR, so i'm not sure how to connect between the two. What is the benefit of breaking up a continuous predictor variable? I'm wondering what the value is in taking a continuous predictor variable and breaking it up (e.g., into quintiles), before using it in a model.   It seems to me that by binning the variable we lose information.   Is this just so we can model non-linear effects?  If we kept the variable continuous and it wasn't really a straight linear relationship would we need to come up with some kind of curve to best fit the data?