How to enable virtualization via PowerShell on Win10, HP laptop? Reason why I am not doing it this way: Go to Windows Settings Click on Update &amp; Security Now click on Recovery Click Restart now under Advanced startup Go to Troubleshoot Click on Advanced Options Now click on UEFI Firmware Settings Click Restart. --&gt; My monitor on the laptop is broken, and thus I use an external monitor, when I go restart, I see the broken monitor &quot;light up&quot;, but this restartu modus doesnt switch on the external monitor...
Lately my laptop (HP g42 247sb) screen is damaged, so I hook it up with an external monitor (LG something) and it works fine now.  The only annoying thing is I cannot navigate the BIOS menu for some tweaking because the BIOS not shown on the external monitor, instead, it only shown on the broken laptop screen, and  it only output to my external monitor when Windows/OS is logged-on.  So, is there anyway I can force output during BIOS/BOOT/POST to my external monitor?  Things I have done and didn't work:   Set my LG monitor as primary display on both window properties and Intel Graphics panel  Enter the BIOS (F10 key) and press the Fn+F4 key (change display output). Disable and uninstall my internal screen (broken laptop screen) using device manager and restart, but Windows (BIOS?) install it back on log-on. Closed lid/Magnet on sensor.
Traditional search-as-you-type on newer Nautilus versions Until now I was using a "traditional" version of Nautilus: that that comes with Ubuntu 10.10. Now I'm using 3.6.3, included with Ubuntu 13.04 (most likely any recent version is equivalent for the scope of my question, anyway).  One major difference between the two is the search-as-you-type behavior: in classic versions of Nautilus, when you typed an input, the file with the closest alphabetical match would become the selected one, the eligible files/folders being restricted to the current directory.  The new behavior is to perform an optionally-global search instead.  Can one configure Nautilus to provide the previous functionality ? Could we send a man safely to the Moon in a rocket without knowledge of general relativity? Workflow for converting LaTeX into Open Office / MS Word Format I often have to write up reports based on the analysis of some data. I use R to analyse the data and export tables, figures, and text. This is then included into a LaTeX document either using input or Sweave ().  However, when I collaborate with others, I sometimes need to provide a document in Open Office / MS Word format.  Question:  Thus, assume the simplest scenario   I have a LaTeX document with text, tables, and figures I need to export this reliably into Open Office or MS Word format: this includes mathematical formulas, table formatting, and quality figures) I don't need to go back from MS Word to LaTeX   What is a reliable, efficient, and preferably free process?  Initial Thoughts:   Export to HTML,  LaTeX - LyX - ODF Use odfWeave  that deals with some specific issues associated with LaTeX to Open Office conversion    I was hoping that there is an expert out there who has worked out a good system already. How to change the spacing between figures/tables and text? I was wondering if there is any way to lessen the spaces between figures and text. In my paper I have a lot of figures (graphics) and it is inconvenient for me to have default (large) spaces between text and graphics. Is there any command I could use to change the default settings? Should the personal/research statement be technical? Related:   I know I must describe my past and current research in my personal/research statement or statement of purpose. But do I use technical terms?  I was given the advice that since the people reading my statement are mathematicians (I am applying to US for applied mathematics), they should know what I am talking about.  Although I am applying to applied mathematics, it would also be nice to hear from other fields (biology, computer science, engineering etc) about this. How do I unlock a SQLite database? sqlite&gt; DELETE FROM mails WHERE (`id` = 71); SQL error: database is locked   How do I unlock the database so this will work? My specific question is with the ASUS M3N78-VM motherboard that my home server uses. I currently have 4x2GB installed for a total of 8GB but I was hoping to upgrade to say 16GB (4x4GB). The official specifications of that motherboard says it only supports up to 8GB but it was released back when only 2GB sticks were available. What, if any, would prevent it from working with 4GB sticks now that 4GB sticks are available?  My general question is with motherboards in general... what would prevent a motherboard from working with bigger sticks if its all just the same type (DDR2 for example and same speeds) of memory? What off-camera flash solution should I use with an entry-level Nikon? Where do I put my systemd unit file? How to make sure that Thinkpad discharges external slice battery first? The thing is that when an external slice battery pack is connected, the laptop first discharges the internal one. This is a problem because then it is impossible to switch between multiple external battery packs without powering off the laptop. It is also not possible to just disconnect the external battery pack when you e.g. need to insert it into a docking station.  Thus, my question: how to change the discharge order under Linux?  For my use cases following order would make much more sense: when an external slice battery is connected, first discharge it completely before using power from the internal battery.  Background: For some Thinkpad models (e.g. X220) there are slice battery packs () available that you can connect to the bottom of the laptop (similar to a docking station).  They seem to be supported well on Linux - e.g. the Gnome Shell battery applet includes both batteries (internal and external) when connected - including displaying the current capacity for each. I would say $\infty - \infty=0$ because even though $\infty$ is an undetermined number, $\infty = \infty$. So $\infty-\infty=0$. New messages flagged blue bubble does not go away When someone flags a message in chat all 10k+ users in chat get a little blue bubble to vote on. It shows up in the upper left hand corner of your gravatar (which is in the bottom left of the page).  When someone flags a message and it shows up, if I wait for a second to click on it, and then click on it, and it has already been handled, it shows the message  "There are no flags to display."  In the past, after showing this message, the blue (1) would disappear. However, lately it has not been going away and requires a page refresh in order to remove. Can this be fixed?  This issue is addressed here:  from September 12th 2012. But since it is still occurring 10 months later, I believe the cause is different. How to access blocked sites? I am in Pakistan and  is blocked here. I want to take the Lecture videos from YouTube. In Windows, I was using  to bypass the proxy.   But now, using Ubuntu, I don't know how to bypass the proxy. I found some where that i can bypass the proxy by using putty software. Can you guide me how can I bypass proxy by that? I tried, but I was not able to do so. Kindly tell me some easy method to bypass proxy. I don't want to used websites like accesstoblockedsites.com. What setting causes OS X to let you resize windows behind the dock? I've set up my fair share of Macs over the years, but I've never been able to pinpoint what setting tells OS X that you're ok with being able to drag-resize a window vertically so that it goes behind the dock (assuming the dock is in its default position at the bottom of the screen), as opposed to only being able to resize it vertically so that it is touching the top of the dock's "space".  My work computer is a 21" iMac Core 2 Duo and it drives me crazy because I'll quickly drag-resize a window larger by pulling down and to the right but instead of staying locked vertically above the dock it'll slide behind it which I don't like so then I've gotta jiggle the window around to get it all back into visible space... my home computer (6 core tower) doesn't have this problem even though I've, from what I can tell, set it up nearly identically.  Both machines running the latest version of snow leopard.  Here's a video captured from my machine at home showing the window resize behaviour I prefer. If it helps at all I can do another one from my work machine tomorrow showing the windows resizing behind the dock. System.ListException: Before Insert or Upsert list must not have two identically equal elements - Deep Dive I had the following exception thrown at me when trying to process more than one selected records via a custom button in the list view.    Class Code  global class MerchandiseInventoryClass {      webservice static void ConverttoInventory(String[] merchandise_id)    {        //Convert Merchandise collection into Inventory Collection...         Merchandise__c[] merchandise_collection = [SELECT ID,Author__c,Book_Title__c,Edition__c,Publisher__c,Total_Merchandise_QtyTotal_Qty__c,Status__c FROM Merchandise__c WHERE ID = :merchandise_id];          Inventory__c i = new Inventory__c(); //Line 1        List&lt;Inventory__c&gt; newInventory = new List&lt;Inventory__c&gt;();        for(Merchandise__c m : merchandise_collection )        {            if(m.Status__c !='Fully Converted')            {            i.Author__c = m.Author__c ;            i.Book_Title__c = m.Book_Title__c;            i.Edition__c = m.Edition__c;            i.Publisher__c = m.Publisher__c;            i.Qty_Available__c = m.Total_Merchandise_QtyTotal_Qty__c;            i.Merchandise__c = m.Id;            m.Uninventoried_Qty__c = 0;            m.Status__c = 'Fully Converted';            newInventory.add(i);            }        }        insert newInventory;        update merchandise_collection;    }  }   By moving the Line 1 to within the for loop solved the issue for me.  Thanks to this post (refer the Best Answer in that post)    What puzzles me is that WHY i have to instantiate "i" for every iteration within the loop.  Why the list collection ("newInventory") is complaining that are duplicate elements and why should it even confuse in the first place when I am performing an "insert" even ? This is a follow-up question to the discussion about the finite axiom of choice .  Suppose we have a countable collection of non-empty sets $\{A_1, A_2, A_3,\cdots\}$ Reasoning as indicated in that discussion, we can prove the existence of a choice function $c_n$ such that $c_n(i)$ belongs to $A_i$ for $i = 1,\cdots,n$  Again reasoning as suggested and using induction, we can prove the existence of a function $C$ defined over $\{1, 2, \cdots\}$ such that $C(n)$ is a choice function defined for $i=1,\cdots,n$ with $C(n)(i)$ an element of A_i. We can require in addition that $C(n)(i)$ and $C(n-1)(i)$ are equal for $i=1,\cdots,n-1$.  Now it would it seem that we can prove the countable axiom of choice by taking the union of $C(1)$, $C(2)$, $\cdots$  The question is as follows: why is that proof wrong? I suspect the answer may have something to do with the axiom of union. Styling an input type="file" button How do you style an input type="file" button? I received a journal paper for a review. The paper suggests a solution to an important problem, but the solution is very complicated and has mediocre performance. While reading the paper, I thought of a different solution, which is much simpler and has better performance (to give some scale: their solution is 1 page to write and 5 pages to prove; my solution is 5 lines to write and half a page to prove).  What should I do now?  A. Write my solution in the review, hoping the authors will remember to "thank the anonymous reviewer"?  B. Recommend that the paper published as is, then write a paper of my own with my improved solution?  C. Something else?  EDIT: Before I found the superior solution, I thought of recommending "resubmit with major revision", with the reasons that I mentioned above: your solution is too complicated and its performance is too weak.  However, now I am not sure it is the good course of action. A major revision may take a long time. The authors might even decide to delay or stop working on the paper without telling the editor (or me). Meanwhile, I will have to postpone the publishing of the superior solution for an indefinite amount of time. What do you think? I would like to use pgfplots to create a figure where I plot curves that have a recursive formula. I tried a very simple case that uses the declare function command to see whether this is possible, and I can't compile (TeX capacity exceeded). Is it even possible to do this?  \documentclass{standalone}  \usepackage{pgfplots}  \begin{document}  \begin{tikzpicture}[   declare function={test(\p)=ifthenelse(\p&gt;1, test(\p-1), 0.5);}, ]     \begin{axis}[]     % use TeX as calculator:     \addplot [mark=none] {x};     \addplot [mark=none] {test(0)};     \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document} Cut points and connected space