Tenacious: Zero score accepted answers: more than 5 and 20% of total  Unsung Hero: Zero score accepted answers: more than 10 and 25% of total   I have ,  and .  more than 10 and 25% of total  26*25% = 7   Why I was not awarded with Unsung Hero ?
Just curious whether the process takes a while, and whether it scrapes through history to determine if it was once valid or not. Currently, I have 6 0-vote accepted answers and 20 1+-vote answers (), and that makes it > 5 and > 20% but not for long if voting goes up or down from here. ;-P  Update:  Special thanks to Grace Note for pointing out the  to follow. I upgraded this to a bug because it's been 48 hours during which the criteria supposedly were met. 6 0-votes, 20-23 1+ votes during the whole period. The criteria only last so long, so it may go out of scope soon. If it only checks every 3 days, I'm not sure if that's intentional or a bug.
divides, not divides and cardinalities In group theory it happens very often that you want to say: "The order of $H$ divides / does not divide the order of $G$." But the length of | is then always the same:  $ |H| | |G| $ produces |H|||G|  which is not ideal at all. (The negation \nmid has just this length too.) The length of "divides" should be longer than the "cardinality length". I could use   $ |H| \big| |G|$  but then there is no good way to say "does not divide" with the same length. Also, \big| is no solution when the expression has to be used in subscripts.   I thought it was just me, but I asked other group theorists, and nobody had a solution. I hope there is one.  I am seeking a division sign which is a little longer than the usual | , allows negation (with the same length) and proportionally correct use in subscripts (also under \sum etc.). It does not look professional if the "order sign" has the same length as the "divides" sign. (And what about combinations with absolute values, norms - although personally I don't use them as often as group orders.) I've been modeling a hermit crab and I don't know why but some areas of the mesh are really dark on some spots, like the legs and the claws.   I hope you can help me fix it. How can install Desktop Toggl on Ubuntu 13.04? I try type:  sudo add-apt-repository ppa:official-toggl/ppa sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install desktop-Toggl    But getting information desktop-Toggl not found. Proof of triangle inequality I understand intuitively that this is true, but I'm embarrassed to say I'm having a hard time constructing a rigorous proof that $|a+b| \leq |a|+|b|$. Any help would be appreciated :) How to reinstall Ubuntu keeping my data intact? By looking at an integral and bounding the error? How to allocate aligned memory only using the standard library? I just finished a test as part of a job interview, and one question stumped me, even using Google for reference. I'd like to see what the StackOverflow crew can do with it:  The memset_16aligned function requires a 16-byte aligned pointer passed to it, or it will crash. a) How would you allocate 1024 bytes of memory, and align it to a 16 byte boundary? b) Free the memory after the memset_16aligned has executed.  {        void *mem;    void *ptr;     // answer a) here     memset_16aligned(ptr, 0, 1024);     // answer b) here     } Motivation: I once had one surplus card on my hand, and knew the robbers would come soon. So I gave it to someone for free, to avoid losing more cards when they hit. I was surprised by how badly this was received. Two of the three other players (the hosts of the game) acted upset, like I had tried to cheat. I had to take the card back, get robbed the next turn and 'giving cards away for free' was banned immediately. (Oh, how I hate mid-game additions to the rules. But that's beside the point.)  So now the question: Is this really illegal in Settlers of Catan? Is it generally considered underhanded in any way? If so, why?   My reasoning was like this:        Consider players A and B.   A wants to give B a sheep.   A trades a sheep and one rock to B, in exchange for wheat.   A trades the received wheat for the (formerly his) rock.   A and B now both have the same resources they had in the beginning, only the sheep has moved from A to B. When deriving the quadratic equation as shown in the  () the main proof contains the step: $$ \left(x+{\frac {b}{2a}}\right)^{2}={\frac {b^{2}-4ac}{4a^{2}}} $$ the square root is taken from both sides, so why is  $$\sqrt{4a^2} = 2a$$  in the denominator and not $$ \sqrt{4a^2} = 2\left |a  \right | $$ Could somebody explain this to me? Thank you very much I recently got the book "selected problems in real analysis", and I'm stuck solving the very first problem  $(u_n)$ is a binary sequence iff it only contains $0$ and $1$ in the sequence  Let $A$ be the set of all binary sequences  I have to prove that $A$ and ${2}^{\mathbb{N}}$ have the same cardinality, that is to say there exists a 1-1 function from one set to another  I've thought about maybe considering integers as base-2 numbers  Thanks for your help "wait more than" vs. "wait FOR more than" If you make him wait (for) more than ten minutes, he'll just walk away.  I found both instances on Google Books:  and . So I'm a bid confused. This question led to a new package:      I'm trying to make some good-looking numbers in a circle, using the simple command:  \textcircled{1}   However, the circle is misaligned vertically with the number, and look a bit sloppy:    Any suggestions how can I adjust the vertical alignment so that the numbers look more centered w.r.t to the circles? Or, if that's not an option, what other ways to achieve the same results are possible?  I will use those only for numbers, and in very few places, so manual adjustment per glyph is an option.  I'm using pdfLaTeX with Computer Modern, if that matters. Stopping a Thread in Java? I'm in the process of writing a piece of code that connects to a server spawns a bunch of threads using that connection and does a bunch of "stuff".  There are certain instances where the connection fails and I need to stop everything and start from scratch with a new object.  I wanted to clean up after the object but calling thread.stop on the threads, but this method is seemingly deprecated.  What is the recommended alternative to doing this? Should I write my own cleanup and exit method for each of the threads? Set the thread to null? or something else? What do the plus and minus signs mean in Objective-C next to a method? How can I open a text file with TextWrangler from the Terminal (command line)? When does HashSet 'add' method calls equals? What are "Community Wiki" posts? Some questions and answers are marked Community Wiki and are owned by a community wiki user:  (In fact, this very question is one of them)  Why have Community Wiki posts? How do Community Wiki posts work? How does a post become a Community Wiki post? How can the Community Wiki status be removed from a post? How can I find Community Wiki posts? Tensor product in dual-space I am a bid confused regarding the notation for tensor products when going into dual-space  If $\left| \Psi \rangle \right. = \left| A \rangle \right. \left| B \rangle \right.$ is $ \left. \langle \Psi \right| = \left. \langle A \right| \left. \langle B \right|$ or $\left. \langle B  \right| \left. \langle A \right|$?  My guess is the last choice, since operators should act on   $\left| 0 \rangle \right. = \left( \begin{matrix}   1 \\   0  \end{matrix} \right) $  $\left| 1 \rangle \right. = \left( \begin{matrix}   0 \\   1  \end{matrix} \right) $  so  $\left| 01 \rangle \right. = \left| 0 \rangle \right. \left| 1 \rangle \right. = \left( \begin{matrix}   0 \\   1 \\   0 \\   0  \end{matrix} \right) $  But then, for me, it should be  $\left( \begin{matrix}   0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0  \end{matrix} \right) = \left \langle 10 \right|$ But this is not correct if i calculate the tensor product, since   $\left \langle 1 \right| \left \langle 0 \right| = \left( \begin{matrix}   0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0  \end{matrix} \right)$  For instance, shoulden't it be  $\left| 01 \rangle \right. \left \langle 10 \right| = \left( \begin{matrix}   0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\   0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\   0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\   0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\  \end{matrix} \right) $ ?  I hope I have made my confusion clear What is wrong with this query? (Unknown error parsing query) When I run the following query in query editor I get this error.  Error     Unknown error parsing query   Query  SELECT Id, OwnerId,Account.OwnerId FROM Contact where OwnerId = Account.OwnerId limit 100   Does anybody know what the problem is? Do matrices $ AB $ and $ BA $ have the same minimal and characteristic polynomials? Let $ A, B $ be two square matrices of order $n$. Do $ AB $ and $ BA $ have same minimal and characteristic polynomials?   I have a proof only if $ A$ or $ B $ is invertible. Is it true for all cases?