How to make the object follow another object's vertex?
I just created a plane and added a wave modifier to it, to simply make it look like something fluid. Now, I have an Object that I want to place on the surface of this fluid plane. But how do I do that?  I thought of adding a driver to my Objects location, but I have no clue how to get the location of a certain vertex in runtime.
Request of a domain with no virtualhost in apache ends to default virtualhost If I ask Apache for domain.com that has no Virtual Host setup in Apache configuration, Apache will show the default Virtual Host. How can I prevent this from happening or simply drop the connection? Are the units of the quotient ring $\mathbb{F}_2[x]/\langle x^k+1 \rangle$ known in general, where $\mathbb{F}_2$ is the finite field with two elements? I'm specifically interested in the case where $k$ is divisible by two, such as say $k=8$, or $k=12$.  If so, can they be constructed easily? I'd be grateful if you could provide a few examples. Definition of "pepper" in hash functions Plotting discontinuous functions without spurious vertical segments Why would a company like Apple be buying back its own shares? What is the reason that a company like AAPL is buying back its own shares? Does it have too much cash and it doesn't know what to do with it? So it is returning the cash back to investors? How can I automatically add some skeleton code when creating a new file with vim When creating a new file with vim, I would like to automatically add some skeleton code.  For example, when creating a new xml file, I would like to add the first line:    &lt;?xml version="1.0"?&gt;   Or when creating an html file, I would like to add:  &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"&gt; &lt;html&gt;   &lt;head&gt;     &lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;   &lt;/head&gt;   &lt;body&gt;   &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt; When trying to deploy the converted metadata using VS code sfdx force:mdapi:deploy deploy to my Production Org and I get the error Property 'itemInstances' not valid in version 48.0 and Property 'processOrder' not valid in version 48.0. But when I go to Developer Console and open a class, even though it says 48.0, I have the option to select 49.0, so I am assuming I have 49.0. Yet I get this error. Pretty much all my classes, trigger and components are version 48.0, but I am not sure how that affects flexipages and Approval processes. Below, the  of second-order logic is used.    My question is about a second-order analogue of $ZFC$ other than the usual "second-order $ZFC$." Rather than define the latter, I'll just state that its (set-sized) models are exactly the $V_\kappa$s with $\kappa$ strongly inaccessible (or if you prefer, the uncountable Grothendieck universes).  Specifically, I'm interested in the second-order theory consisting of the usual (first-order) axioms of Pairing, Extensionality, Union, Choice, Infinity, and Powerset, and the Separation and Replacement schemes ranging over second-order formulas. I'll call this "$ZFC_2^{scheme}$."    Specifically, for each formula $\varphi(x, y_1,...,y_k)$ of second-order logic with only the displayed variables, each of which is first-order, we have a corresponding Separation and Replacement instance. We do not allow second-order parameters here, so formulas with second-order free variables don't yield Separation/Replacement instances.   The passage from $ZFC$ to $ZFC_2^{scheme}$ has a nice uniformity: it's an example of a more general operation $\mathcal{ZFC}$ which spits out a $ZFC$-analogue given a logic at least as strong as first-order logic.    This is the reason for the parameter restriction above: I want $ZFC_2^{scheme}$ to look just like $\mathcal{ZFC}(\mathcal{L})$ for any other logic $\mathcal{L}$, and not take into account the particular feature that we now have a new kind of variable at our disposal - and in particular, take as "syntax-free" an approach to logics as we can get away with. (This is a choice of arguable value, but it's the one I'm making for now.)   It's easy to show that every model of $ZFC_2^{scheme}$ is well-founded, so to understand its models we only need to look at transitive sets. A natural hope at this point is that $ZFC_2^{scheme}$ is just second-order $ZFC$ in disguise, that is, that for a transitive set $M$ we have $M\models ZFC_2^{scheme}$ iff $M=V_\kappa$ for some strongly inaccessible $\kappa$. However, this isn't at all obvious to me (although it is easy to show the right-to-left direction).     Question. What are the (set-sized) models of $ZFC_2^{scheme}$?   (Note by contrast that the "arithmetic analogues" $PA_2^{scheme}$ and second-order $PA$ are equivalent since each pins down $\mathbb{N}$ up to isomorphism - although that leads to .)  (I'm happy to drop Choice if that would help.)  EDIT: As Hanul Jeon pointed out below,  shows that consistently $ZFC_2^{scheme}$ (there called "$ZFC_2^{def}$") has countable models, so we have a partial answer. However, I don't see at the moment a way to get an outright $ZFC$ proof that $ZFC_2^{scheme}$ is strictly weaker than second-order $ZFC$. How should an educational institute woo good faculty? Flag indicator present on Meta, but no flags visible Is Multiplying the Inverse Better or Worse? When dealing with double data types is multiplying by the inverse better or worse? Which way is faster? Which way uses less memory? Which way is preferred? How does MSIL handle this? SquareInches = MMSquared / 645.16  SquareInches = MMSquared * 0.0015500031000062000124000248000496    NB: 10K users will note that this is a duplicate of , which was deleted because the original question asker decided to berate everyone in the 'comments' section of the question.  This question was reposted because it is a 'good' question. Please 'uncheck' Community Wiki for your answer, as I'm only posting this as CW so that it's not seen as a 'reputation' grab. Related Question: If Eren Jaeger dies without transfering his titan powers, will both powers transfer to the same child? It's told in the story that if a titan shifter dies without transferring his power, this power will go to an eldian person who just was born. If Eren Jaeger dies without transferring his titan powers, will the attack titan and the founding titan go to different persons?  Note that his is not a duplicate of  as this is not about what happens when a titan shifter dies. But what happens if a titan shifter with 2 powers dies, which is not answered in the answer. There are a few examples of pairs of words ending with -ee/-er like employee and employer or advisee and adviser. What I was curious about is if there was any rule that would describe the relationship of the objects in a pair like this and situations when it's appropriate to create a counterpart for a given word.   I'll give you an example. It's relatively common in the computer programming world to see the word dragee, which describes an object that is being dragged with a mouse. I understand that this is a relatively new word and could not be found in any dictionary (I've tried). Is that acceptable to make up words like this one or is it just bad English? I have this setup:   The mesh is only the visible top side, with a mirror modifier for the bottom part. Now I want to unwrap it like in the picture. I want the inner circle (red) to go to the top of the UV map...  The problem is that no matter what automatic unwrapping I use, it never works as intended.  The closest I've gotten was by using "follow quads", but that skewed the UV map a lot:   I used the result from the second image and manually adjusted the vertices with a lot of scaling and "align auto", but its very far from perfect as you can see in the first image.  Here's what I want exactly:   The uv vertices should be distributed evenly (horizontally) The middle line (yellow) should be on a "natural" y height (so there's no stretching)   I hope it's clear what I want to achieve. I'm sure there must be some automatic way to perfectly align and distribute the UVs in this way.  By the way: If you look closely you can see that I already placed a uv seam (aligned with the green y axis in the screenshot) but that didn't really help. Sufficiency to prove the convergence of a sequence using even and odd terms Unzip a file with php Printing pointers in C Given complex $|z_{1}| = 2\;\;,|z_{2}| = 3\;\;, |z_{3}| = 4\;\;$ : when and what is $\max$ of $|z_{1}-z_{2}|^2+|z_{2}-z_{3}|^2+|z_{3}-z_{1}|^2$ Calculate Limit 0f nested square roots Prove that $\lim f(x) =0$ and $\lim (f(2x)-f(x))/x =0$ imply $\lim f(x)/x =0$