Let's say I traveled for 6 hours and 40 min. How should I write that?      6 hours and 40 min   or     6.40 hours   or     6.40 min   or     6h.40 min
I'm a bit confused in describing 1.5hrs in words.   Is writing one and a half an hour correct or should it be one and half hour?  E.g:     I'll see you there in one and a half an hour.     OR       I'll see you there in one and half hour.   Or is there any other correct way of writing this?
High p-values for logistic regression variable that perfectly separates? I'm using R to run some logistic regression. My variables were continuous, but I used cut to bucket the data. Some particular buckets for these variables always result in dependent variable being equal to 1. As expcted, the coefficient estimate for this bucket is very high, but the p-value is also high. There are about ~90 observations in either these buckets, and around 800 total observations, so I don't think it's a problem of sample size. Also, this variable should not be related to other variables, which would naturally reduce their p-values.  Are there any other plausible explanations for the high p-value?  Example:  myData &lt;- read.csv("application.csv", header = TRUE) myData$FICO &lt;- cut(myData$FICO, c(0, 660, 680, 700, 720, 740, 780, Inf), right = FALSE) myData$CLTV &lt;- cut(myData$CLTV, c(0, 70, 80, 90, 95, 100, 125, Inf), right = FALSE) fit &lt;- glm(Denied ~ CLTV + FICO, data = myData, family=binomial())   Results are something like this:  Deviance Residuals:       Min        1Q    Median        3Q       Max   -1.53831  -0.77944  -0.62487   0.00027   2.09771    Coefficients:                 Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(&gt;|z|)     (Intercept)     -1.33630    0.23250  -5.747 9.06e-09 *** CLTV(70,80]     -0.54961    0.34864  -1.576 0.114930     CLTV(80,90]     -0.51413    0.31230  -1.646 0.099715 .   CLTV(90,95]     -0.74648    0.37221  -2.006 0.044904 *   CLTV(95,100]     0.38370    0.37709   1.018 0.308906     CLTV(100,125]   -0.01554    0.25187  -0.062 0.950792     CLTV(125,Inf]   18.49557  443.55550   0.042 0.966739     FICO[0,660)     19.64884 3956.18034   0.005 0.996037     FICO[660,680)    1.77008    0.47653   3.715 0.000204 *** FICO[680,700)    0.98575    0.30859   3.194 0.001402 **  FICO[700,720)    1.31767    0.27166   4.850 1.23e-06 *** FICO[720,740)    0.62720    0.29819   2.103 0.035434 *   FICO[740,780)    0.31605    0.23369   1.352 0.176236     --- Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1  (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)      Null deviance: 1037.43  on 810  degrees of freedom Residual deviance:  803.88  on 798  degrees of freedom AIC: 829.88  Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 16   FICO in the range [0, 660) and CLTV in the range (125, Inf] indeed always results in Denial = 1, so their coefficients are very large, but why are they also "insignificant"? Why does prime factorization for LCM work? A method to finding the LCM of two numbers is to use prime factoring. I know how to do this, but logically why does this work in finding the lcm What kind of "mathematical object" are limits? What is the bug about: Keyword gets duplicated even when the query is not modified.  Impact: As far as i can tell - cosmetic.  How to replicate: Go to:  and keep pressing Search button. With each search there will be a duplicate python keyword appended to search box.  Best guess for what is causing it: I think you have somewhere a piece of code that appends tag as a keyword without checking if it is already present. My reasoning comes from this url:  not having the same issue - the tag is not present in it. Quick way to remove solidify thickness I have made the mesh and added solidify modifier and applied. But later i thought to increase the thickness. So now i want to remove thickness so that i can added the solidify modifier again. I want to know is there any quick remove thicknes. When i select the edge then ctrl+ the selection goes downward not to single face. So i want to know a quick way to decrease thickness. Any suggestion or help. Question  I want to write a book in Arabic (I have an Arabic keyboard, so I don't need a converter). By Arabic book I mean literally Arabic:    title, table of contents  etc    all in Arabic.   The equations, however, I want to write them in English/Latin.  Related    This link helped a lot but it was for Arabic texts in an English main document.    I already checked these two (and plenty other sites). I'm trying to search and replace a string in all files matched by grep: grep -n 'foo' * will give me output in the form: [filename]:[line number]:[text]  For each file returned by grep, I'd like to modify the file by replacing foo with bar. I am able to successfully use wp.hooks.applyFilters() and wp.hooks.addFilter(), but I'm not able to render a React Component using wp.hooks.addAction(). However, the console.log() runs just fine within the callback for an action. This is my code:  import { createHooks } from '@wordpress/hooks';  let globalHooks = createHooks();  const Header = () =&gt; {     return (         &lt;h1&gt;Header Component&lt;/h1&gt;     ); }  const RevisedHeader = () =&gt; {     return (         &lt;h1&gt;Revised Header Component&lt;/h1&gt;     ) }  export default class App extends Component {      constructor( props ) {         super();          globalHooks.addFilter( 'replace_header', 'revisedHeaderCallback', this.revisedHeaderCallback );         globalHooks.addAction( 'after_replace_header', 'afterRevisedHeaderCallback', this.afterRevisedHeaderCallback );     };      revisedHeaderCallback( header ) {         return &lt;RevisedHeader /&gt;;     }      afterRevisedHeaderCallback() {         return &lt;RevisedHeader /&gt;;     }      render() {          return(             &lt;div className="App"&gt;                 { globalHooks.applyFilters( 'replace_header', &lt;Header /&gt; ) }                 { globalHooks.doAction( 'after_replace_header' ) }             &lt;/div&gt;         );     } } Ball $X^*$ is weak-star metrizable iff X is separable in Conway's book. This is a Theorem in Conway's book     I don't understand in the third paragraph why there are open sets $\{U_n:n\geq1\}$ in $(ball X^*,wk^*)$ such that $0\in U_n$ and $\bigcap^{\infty}_{n=1}U_n=\{0\}$. By the definition of the relative weak-star topology on ball $X^*$, for each $n$, there exists a finite set $F_n$ contained in $X$ such that $$\{x^*\in\text{ball }X^*:|\langle x,x^*\rangle|&lt;1 \text{ for all }x\in F_n\}\subseteq U_n.$$  Can someone explain this for me？ Thank you so much!! How many "Recommend Close" votes is too many? Why is the ROC curve two-dimensional instead of three-dimensional? When I understand it correctly, a  curve composes of a lot of ratios of TPR and FPR. Each such ratio is gained, e.g., by scanning/investigating a parameter where the ratio is the result of the used classifier. In other words: I'm interested in how a classifier separates data points according to a frequency interval of 0-100 Hz. Hence I scan this frequency, record all the 101 ratios, put them into the plot and the ROC curve represents these datapoints, finally.  Wouldn't it be much more interesting when the frequency would be used as a third axis? Or is it implicit in the axis? But anyway, I think it would be easier to look at with a third axis? How can I convert from hex to base64? Can anyone recommend a straightforward way/tool to convert hex to base64?  I'm using Linux and OS X. Curvature of a curve on a sphere Do the search engines take the number of 404 errors returned by a site into account when calculating the site rank? For example I have 8,000 404 errors and I am thinking that that's affecting my SEO in a negative way.  However, I read  about 404 errors which suggests that they are not always a negative quality indicator.   So I am confused...are high numbers of 404 errors harmful to a site or not? Solve $\frac{d}{dx}f(x)=f(x-1)$ I am trying to find a function such that   $\dfrac{d}{dx}f(x)=f(x-1)$   Is there such function other than $0$ ? Is it allowed/desirable to post code snippets? Many introductory quantum mechanics textbooks include simple exercises on computing the de Broglie wavelength of macroscopic objects, often contrasting the results with that of a proton, etc.  For instance, this example, taken from a textbook:     Calculate the de Broglie wavelength for      (a) a proton of kinetic energy 70 MeV      (b) a 100 g bullet moving at 900 m/s   The pedagogical motivation behind these questions is obvious: when the de Broglie wavelength is small compared to the size of an object, the wave behaviour of the object is undetectable.  But what is the validity of the actual approach of applying the formula naively? Of course, a 100g bullet is not a fundamental object of 100g but a lattice of some $10^{23}$ atoms bound by the electromagnetic force. But is the naive answer close to the actual one (i.e. within an order of magnitude or two)? How does one even calculate the de Broglie wavelength for a many body system accurately? I would very much like that the the appendix sections of the Table of Contents doesn't have a section numbers, dots, and page numbers. If I do the following  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tocloft} \addtocontents{toc}{\cftpagenumbersoff{section}} \renewcommand{\cftdot}{} \begin{document} \tableofcontents \newpage \section{Appendix} \section*{Another Letter} \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Another Letter} \end{document}   then the section "Another Letter" is left aligned, so it doesn't look like the  others.  Question  Is it possible to have "Another Letter" styled the same way as normal TOC entries, but just without section number, dots, and page number? Is there a single word to describe a solution that hasn't been optimized? I am working with some code, and I would like to describe the difference in its performance when it is optimized versus when it is not optimized. Unfortunately, I can't find a word to describe the code before it is optimized; "sub-optimal" might work, but I want to emphasize that this is the first iteration of the code. If "unoptimized" were a word, I would use that, but I haven't found any references to it in any dictionary.  Perhaps "raw" or "original"? Screen goes white when posting a comment