We have a org wide email addressed which has been &quot;Verified&quot; into our sandbox. I understant org wide email addressed is unsupported metadata, so this was achieved as pre deployment step. Into our repo, we have a workflow that send email alert to that org wide email address. &quot; Workflow ... noreply@mycompany.com.au OrgWideEmailAddress The problem we are facing is that we are still getting the following error even if this org wide email address is verified: You must specify a verified Org Wide Email Address for this sender type. Is that a bug in the metadata api or expected behaviour ? Ideally we would like to not have to do that as a post deployment step. PS: We are running DX under api version 44.0 This question was asked  but no answer was left
We have a org wide email addressed which has been "Verified" into our sandbox. I understant org wide email addressed is unsupported metadata, so this was achieved as pre deployment step.   Into our repo, we have a workflow that send email alert to that org wide email address. "  Workflow   ... &lt;senderAddress&gt;noreply@mycompany.com.au&lt;/senderAddress&gt; &lt;senderType&gt;OrgWideEmailAddress&lt;/senderType&gt;    The problem we are facing is that we are still getting the following error even if this org wide email address is verified:      You must specify a verified Org Wide Email Address for this sender   type.   Is that a bug in the metadata api or expected behaviour ? Ideally we would like to not have to do that as a post deployment step.   PS: We are running DX under api version 43.0
How do I determine the size of my array in C? How do I determine the size of my array in C?   That is, the number of elements the array can hold? losing ligatures when switching font series or color in the middle of a word Sum of compact sets Let $A,B$ two non-empty compact subsets of a normed space X. How can we prove that the set $S=A+B=\{a+b : a \in A, b \in B\}$ is compact?  Here's my reasoning:  Let $\Omega = \{\Omega_1, \Omega_2,…\}$ be an open cover of $S$. $\Omega$ induces two open cover $X,Y$ respectively of $A,B$, where   $X_i = \{a \in A : a+b \in \Omega_i~~for~some~b\}$   $Y_i = \{b \in B : a+b \in \Omega_i~~for~some~a\}$  in practice $\Omega_i = X_i + Y_i$.  Now my idea is build a finite subcover this way: consider a finite subcover $X_F = \{X_j : j \in J\}$ where $J$ is a finite set of indices. If $Y_F = \{Y_j : j \in J\}$ is a finite subcover of $B$, then we are done as $\{\Omega_j : j \in J\}$ is a subcover of $\Omega$. Otherwise we can keep adding indexes to set $J$ until $Y_F$ becomes a finite subcover of $B$.   This is not too formal but I don't want to make a simple question unreadable, I think the idea should be clear.   Does this works? Is there a better/easier way to get the same result? In the example  $\cup^{i=1}_{\infty}F_i$   How do you get the i=1 directly below the union symbol and the infinity directly above? Removing elements with Array.map in JavaScript I would like to filter an array of items by using the map() function. Here is a code snippet:  var filteredItems = items.map(function(item) {     if( ...some condition... )     {         return item;     } });   The problem is that filtered out items still uses space in the array and I would like to completely wipe them out.  Any idea?  EDIT: Thanks, I forgot about filter(), what I wanted is actually a filter() then a map().  EDIT2: Thanks for pointing that map() and filter() are not implemented in all browsers, although my specific code was not intended to run in a browser. Static Classes In Java LAN not working on 17.04 Actually yesterday I've upgraded from Ubuntu 16.04 to 17.04 and I got a problem that, if connect LAN cable it does not showing anything and  remains disconnected. But i can connect with WiFi. I don't know what's the problem. Actually its showing "device not managed" under the "Ethernet Network" and both were disabled. I've searched for the solution, but did not found yet. How to recognise/thank great cabin crew? Those of us who fly a lot will know that there is a bit of a variety in cabin crew. Some (sadly more common on certain airlines) do the very bare minimum to ensure a safe flight, but nothing more. Many (especially on airlines noted for good customer service) provide a good service.  Every so often though, you come across a flight crew who go the extra mile. These are the ones always friendly, always helpful, always thinking ahead and solving the problem before it has happened. One moment they're serving you your drink, the next reassuring a little old lady about the flight, the next magicing a colouring book to turn an impending toddler crisis into a happy small child, then answering queries on arrivals and immigration for a first time travaller, then back to offer you a top up of what you're drinking (which they've remembered exactly). Not very often found, but very much appreciated when you happen across them on your travels!  In the case when you do luck out and find yourself on a flight with a great cabin crew (who go well beyond what you normally experience as "good" on that airline/kind of airline), is there a standard/common way to recognise them at the end of the flight? Not just to thank them then and there, but also to let the airline know that this person/group are what the rest of their staff should be aspiring to. Is there any standard way, or does it vary entirely by carrier? Are there good reasons why it's a better practice to have only one return statement in a function?   Or is it okay to return from a function as soon as it is logically correct to do so, meaning there may be many return statements in the function? Word for obscuring bad or immoral acts with verbiage I have been in many scenarios where people try to obscure/reduce the intensity of a seemingly bad or immoral act using grammar. E.g. Assuming Thomas killed a dog, you could hear something like:     There's essentially nothing wrong about palliating the miserable life   of a despondent being. If there was any issue here, I'd say it's not   consulting a veterinary doctor first but I've come to understand that some people are just straightforward.   How does one react to the above mumbo jumbo? I think there are similar situations also found in law courts. What can this be referred to as? Grammatification, obscure tactics? Geometric solution to find a Set of totally ordered Subsets of $ \mathbb{N} $ is uncountable My question is, does there exist a set of subsets of the naturals, $S$, such that $S$ is uncountable, where for any two subsets $A,B \in S$ we have either $A \subset B $ or $B \subset A $?  Initially my thoughts were that we could construct a chain $A_{1} \subset A_{2} \subset \cdots $ and find a bijection by picking out one element which is 'new' to each set by axiom of choice and so we have bijected to a subset of naturals, however I'm not convinced this fully works.  Furthermore, I was thinking there may be a nice elegant solution by looking for such a set in either $ \mathbb{Q}^2 $ or $ \mathbb{Z}^2 $ for example, but any attempt seems to fail due to the 'ordering' part of the question. Suppose you have a history containing the three commits A, B and C:  A-B-C   I would like to combine the two commits A and B to one commit AB:  AB-C   I tried  git rebase -i A   which opens up my editor with the following contents:  pick e97a17b B pick asd314f C   I change this to  squash e97a17b B pick asd314f C   Then Git 1.6.0.4 says:  Cannot 'squash' without a previous commit   Is there a way or is this just impossible? Let the search find questions by ID Suppose I want to know whether $\sqrt{7}\in\mathbb{Q}_5$, or more generally, whether $\sqrt{n}\in\mathbb{Q}_p$ for $n\in\mathbb{Z}$, $p$ an odd prime. What are the techniques for determining this? Am I supposed to "lift" it from $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$ using Hensel's lemma? Could I see an example? To be specific, I have an event table that logs when a user joins or leaves a team.  It looks something like the following:  ------------------------------------- | user | event  | team | timestamp | ------------------------------------- | A    | joined | 1    | 2016-1-1  | | B    | joined | 1    | 2016-1-1  | | C    | left   | 1    | 2016-1-1  | | C    | joined | 2    | 2016-1-1  | | A    | left   | 1    | 2016-1-2  | | A    | joined | 2    | 2016-1-2  | | B    | left   | 1    | 2016-1-3  | | A    | left   | 2    | 2016-1-3  | -------------------------------------   I need to restructure this in a view to look something like the following  -------------------------------------- | user | team | joined    | left     | -------------------------------------- | A    | 1    | 2016-1-1  | 2016-1-2 | | A    | 2    | 2016-1-2  | 2016-1-3 | | B    | 1    | 2016-1-1  | 2016-1-3 | | C    | 1    | null      | 2016-1-1 | | C    | 2    | 2016-1-1  | null     | --------------------------------------   How can I achieve this?  For more detail, I'm attempting to do this in Amazon Redshift (PostgreSQL) highest power of prime $p$ dividing $\binom{m+n}{n}$ I am building a blog type page, and I want to load items into the page as the user scrolls down, much like Google Reader, or Soup.io. How would you go about achieving this effect? I've seen some examples which read the height of the page, and have an onScroll even attached to the window so that as the user scrolls down we can test to see if they've scrolled down far enough to warrant loading more items. Soup.io's implementation seems to remove the old items as you scroll down so that the browser isn't dealing with an ever-increasingly large DOM tree. Which javascript libraries would be best suited to this task? What are the meaning and possible origin of "word!" and "word up"? Several times, I have had conversations, all over instant messenger, finish with "word" or "Word up G".  As it ends a conversation, I am guessing it is like "goodbye".  My question is what is the meaning of "word" and "word up g"? Also, what is the origin?  I am more interested in the meaning as that will help with understanding its usage. Are vacuum fluctuations really happening all the time? In popular physics articles and even some physics classes I've been to, the vacuum of space is described as being constantly full of quantum fluctuations.  Supposedly, all sorts of particle-antiparticle pairs at all scales are constantly appearing and disappearing.  We end up with a mental image of the vacuum as a roiling, choppy sea with all sorts of things going on, rather than a calm, placid background.  However, the vacuum, being the lowest-energy state of a theory, should be an energy eigenstate—which means it is time-invariant (except for a physically-irrelevant phase factor).  So it seems the vacuum really should not be seen as a dynamic entity with all kinds of stuff happening in it, as we're led to believe.   that     A “vacuum fluctuation” is when the ground state of a system is measured in a basis that does not include the ground state; it’s merely a special case of a quantum fluctuation.   So it sounds as if the existence of vacuum fluctuations is contingent on measuring the vacuum—in particular, measuring something that doesn't commute with energy (such as, I guess, the value of a field at a point).  How much truth is there to the idea that vacuum fluctuations are constantly happening everywhere, all the time?  Is that really a useful way to think about it, or just a myth that has been propagated by popularizations of physics? Why and how is sound produced when two objects hit each other? When two objects collide and undergo a partially inelastic collision (so every one we experience in every-day life), they rebound to a certain degree, but kinetic energy is not conserved. Thus, the energy of motion must be converted to another type of energy. Thus, when two object collide, the most common forms of energy that kinetic energy is converted to are sound energy and thermal energy.   Some collisions are louder than others just because they cause a bigger local variation of pressure (which then propagates through air until finally gets heard). So, why some objects, even if the velocity before and after the collision seems to be the same, are louder than others? I mean, how do the different material properties enter in the phenomenon?  How and why, by means of solid and fluid mechanics or with an heuristical microscopical reasoning, can this process be explained?