I would like to set-up my laptop's networking to use exclusively LAN (Ethernet) connection when both LAN andWiFi are available? (In my case wired and wireless connections come from the same router.)  I do not want to simply disable WiFi (though it's just a button push) but to have wired connection set as a preference.  Is there an easy way to do so?
When I am at my desk and my laptop is in its docking station I want to ensure that it uses its wired connection and not my wireless network. I am hoping/guessing that the preference in connection is based on the order of the listed connections in the Network and Sharing Center. I could just switch the wireless off but I'd prefer to not have to go through the trouble.
I wanted to leave the question title as is so as not to take away from my amusement :).  Anyway,     It's raining.   What is raining? Is it the sky? The clouds? The weather? The rain? What is "it"? Any historical insights on the statement? Driver for Validity Sensors Fingerprint scanner prakhar@pr3d4tOr:~$ lsusb -s 001:003 -v  Bus 001 Device 003: ID 138a:0018 Validity Sensors, Inc. Fingerprint scanner Couldn't open device, some information will be missing Device Descriptor:   bLength                18   bDescriptorType         1   bcdUSB               1.10   bDeviceClass          255 Vendor Specific Class   bDeviceSubClass        17    bDeviceProtocol       255    bMaxPacketSize0         8   idVendor           0x138a Validity Sensors, Inc.   idProduct          0x0018 Fingerprint scanner   bcdDevice            0.78   iManufacturer           0    iProduct                0    iSerial                 1    bNumConfigurations      1   Configuration Descriptor:     bLength                 9     bDescriptorType         2     wTotalLength           46     bNumInterfaces          1     bConfigurationValue     1     iConfiguration          0      bmAttributes         0xa0       (Bus Powered)       Remote Wakeup     MaxPower              100mA     Interface Descriptor:       bLength                 9       bDescriptorType         4       bInterfaceNumber        0       bAlternateSetting       0       bNumEndpoints           4       bInterfaceClass       255 Vendor Specific Class       bInterfaceSubClass      0        bInterfaceProtocol      0        iInterface              0        Endpoint Descriptor:         bLength                 7         bDescriptorType         5         bEndpointAddress     0x01  EP 1 OUT         bmAttributes            2           Transfer Type            Bulk           Synch Type               None           Usage Type               Data         wMaxPacketSize     0x0040  1x 64 bytes         bInterval               0       Endpoint Descriptor:         bLength                 7         bDescriptorType         5         bEndpointAddress     0x81  EP 1 IN         bmAttributes            2           Transfer Type            Bulk           Synch Type               None           Usage Type               Data         wMaxPacketSize     0x0040  1x 64 bytes         bInterval               0       Endpoint Descriptor:         bLength                 7         bDescriptorType         5         bEndpointAddress     0x82  EP 2 IN         bmAttributes            2           Transfer Type            Bulk           Synch Type               None           Usage Type               Data         wMaxPacketSize     0x0040  1x 64 bytes         bInterval               0       Endpoint Descriptor:         bLength                 7         bDescriptorType         5         bEndpointAddress     0x83  EP 3 IN         bmAttributes            3           Transfer Type            Interrupt           Synch Type               None           Usage Type               Data         wMaxPacketSize     0x0008  1x 8 bytes         bInterval               4   I have searched high and low but I cannot get this to work. All questions related to 138a:0018 are either unanswered or old. Any help guys? Change bounding box of math glyphs in LuaTeX I'm trying to use the Garamond-Math font in LuaTeX (despite the documentation saying I should use it with XeTeX only :-). It's working more or less OK with LuaTeX, except for some unfortunate glyph combinations, mostly at the end of inline math, such as “where $T$ is the period”.  I used \fbox to draw the bounding box of the glyph and noticed that the bounding boxes are different in LuaTeX:        and in XeTeX:        In XeTeX the glyph fits almost entirely in the bounding box, but in LuaTeX it overshoots far too much.  I'm not a font guy, so I have no idea why this happens. I thought the bounding box was a property of the font, so in my imagination the result should be the same. Thus the first question is: what actually happens that the bounding boxes are different?  The second question, in the title, is: can I change the bounding box of specific glyphs (using LuaTeX) so that the output looks more like XeTeX's?  I tried manually adding some spacing after the glyphs, but this looks hideous and will go down the drain if I happen to change the font or engine, so I'd really like not to do that. I also tried using the italic correction \/ but it seems to have no effect in math.  Here's the code to produce the pictures above:  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{unicode-math} \setmathfont{Garamond-Math.otf} \begin{document} \fboxrule=1sp \fboxsep=0pt In Lua\TeX{} this \fbox{$T$} looks horrible, but the \fbox{$X$} looks OK. \Huge\fbox{$T$}\quad. \end{document}   I'm using TL 2018:  This is LuaTeX, Version 1.07.0 (TeX Live 2018)  (format=lualatex 2019.3.29)  13 APR 2019 12:43  restricted system commands enabled. **test.tex (./test.tex LaTeX2e &lt;2018-12-01&gt; Lua module: luaotfload-main 2019-02-14 2.96 luaotfload entry point Someone is offering to pay me in a sort of sugar daddy/sugar baby arrangement. They want to make online deposits to me, and they're asking me for my online banking username and password. Is that information alone enough for them to be able to take my money out of my account, or am I safe? Referencing to "above" or "below"? How to prove $\vdash\neg P\to (P\to Q)$? I am trying to prove,  $$\vdash\neg P\to (P\to Q)$$  where $P$ and $Q$ are arbitrary but otherwise fixed formulas. The only axioms and rule of inference that I can use are,  $\color{crimson}{\text{Axiom 1.}}\  P\to (Q\to P)$ $\color{crimson}{\text{Axiom 2.}}\  (S\to (P\to Q))\to((S\to P)\to (S\to Q))$ $\color{crimson}{\text{Axiom 3.}}\  (\neg Q\to\neg P)\to(P\to Q)$ $\color{crimson}{\text{Rule of Inference.}}$ .  I know that in Angelo Margaris's book First Order Mathematical Logic there is a proof (page 53) but as I have mentioned , the dot notation seems very confusing and translating them to the nested parentheses notation seems very difficult to me. So, I am trying on my own to prove the result. Can anyone help? Array Modifier - Fit Curve too short I want to create a simple road. To do this I first want to apply an 'Array Modifier' which fits the curve. So in the Array modifier I changed the 'Fit Type' from 'Fixed Count' to 'Fit Curve'. But now the Path is much shorter than the road it self.  And If I extrude the curve the road goes even longer and longer. Is there a way the road is as long as the path? If $f \in \mathcal{L}^1(\mathbb{R})$ then $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x+h)-f(x)|dx\rightarrow 0$ I am working on some past prelim problems and one of them is the following: If $f \in \mathcal{L}^1(\mathbb{R})$ then $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x+h)-f(x)|dx\rightarrow 0$   Update: Following Jackie Chong's advice, I am attempting this problem with the dominated convergence theorem. Since $f\in L^1(\mathbb{R})$, $f$ can be approximated from below by a sequence of continuous functions $f_n$. Then, I believe I can say that, for all $n$ sufficiently large, $|f_n(x+\frac{1}{n})-f_n(x)|\le 2|f(x)|$. (I'm not sure of this part thought). Then $2|f(x)|$ is integrable and hence a dominating function for $|f_n(x+\frac{1}{n})-f_n(x)|$. So by the dominated convergence theorem we can take the limit inside $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\int|f_n(x+\frac{1}{n})-f(x)|dx=\int \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}|f_n(x+\frac{1}{n})-f(x)|dx=0$ Is this on the right track?  Another approach that I thought may work, but which I'm less certain of is the following: If $f$ can be approximated by $C^1$ functions (I have no real justification for this, so please correct me if its wrong), then for each $n$ and each $x$ there is some $y(x,n)\in B_{1/n}(x)$ such that $|f(x+\frac{1}{n}-f(x)|=\frac{1}{n}|f'(y(x,n)|$ but from here I don't see how to proceed, because just because $|f|$ is integrable, I can't justify $|f'|$ being integrable, but if there is some way to fix this approach, hints would be appreciated.   Another thing I was thinking was to first approximate $f$ from below by continuous functions $f_n$ then to define $g_{m,n}=|f_n(x+\frac{1}{m})-f_n(x)| \chi_{[-m,m]}$. Then, for each $n$, the function $g_{m,n}$ is continuous on its support, and since it support is compact, it is uniformly continuous there. Can this be used to justify bringing the limit $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}$ inside the integral? Then apply the monotone convergence theorem? I know this idea is probably even more sketchy than my previous one, but if it can be fixed please let me know :)  Thanks! Segmentation fault error occurs for a simple function I have coded As the question title suggests, how do I see that every left ideal of a square matrix ring over a field is principal? Suppose $s$ is a complex number with $\Re(s) \in (0,1]$ and $\{a_n\}$ is a complex sequence converging to $a \neq 0$. Must the Dirichlet series $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{a_n}{n^s}$$ diverge? When trying to view  via the iOS app, I get this:        It's consistent, retrying does not help and the request always fail.  All other questions load just fine, so I highly suspect the cause is the Emoji icons used in there, especially in the comments that contain lots of them.  Beta channel, version 1.0.1.85  Update: still happening in 1.0.1.88 and I also found that the "preview" seen for example in tag search shows the Emoji just fine: Where can I ask an open discussion question? Java Enum definition I thought I understood Java generics pretty well, but then I came across the following in java.lang.Enum:  class Enum&lt;E extends Enum&lt;E&gt;&gt;   Could someone explain how to interpret this type parameter? Bonus points for providing other examples of where a similar type parameter could be used. I was recently in a bit of a quandary over which answer to accept to .  Of the answers I got, two were the clear leaders and, of course, I up-voted both. Choosing a 'winner' was more difficult though as their approaches were quite different.  Answer A addressed my question and provided a clear and well thought out response. I'd anticipate that this answer would be of most use to a user who found my question via a search. Selecting this would probably be the more community-focused way to go.  Answer B took a more lateral approach and made some guesses at the business logic behind my request, suggesting that I might be asking the wrong question. Their solution was based on this assumption - and they were spot on. Answer B formed the basis of my fix for the problem.  So... Best answer to the question or best solution to the problem - they may not always be the same thing.   I took the selfish approach and went with B. I'm not losing sleep over it, but I do wonder if I did the right thing? Undefined control sequence BibTex This is one of the BibTex entries giving the problem:  @ARTICLE{2015ApJ...808L..36B,    author = {{Bonnivard}, V. and {Combet}, C. and {Maurin}, D. and {Geringer-Sameth}, A. and      {Koushiappas}, S.~M. and {Walker}, M.~G. and {Mateo}, M. and      {Olszewski}, E.~W. and {Bailey}, III, J.~I.},     title = "{Dark Matter Annihilation and Decay Profiles for the Reticulum II Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy}",   journal = {\apjl}, archivePrefix = "arXiv",    eprint = {1504.03309},  primaryClass = "astro-ph.HE",  keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: individual: Reticulum II, gamma rays: galaxies, methods: statistical, stars: kinematics and dynamics},      year = 2015,     month = aug,    volume = 808,       eid = {L36},     pages = {L36},       doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L36},    adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808L..36B},   adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System} }   and corresponding bbl file giving the error at compilation is  \bibitem{2009ApJ...697.1071A} {\sc W.~B. {Atwood}, A.~A. {Abdo}, M.~{Ackermann}, W.~{Althouse},   B.~{Anderson}, M.~{Axelsson}, L.~{Baldini}, J.~{Ballet}, D.~L. {Band},   G.~{Barbiellini}, and et~al.} \newblock {\bf {The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope   Mission}}. \newblock {\em \apj}, {\bf 697}:1071--1102, June 2009.   My guess is that Kile doesn't like references of the form 2015ApJ...808L..36B since these are the only ones giving the error.    Can somebody hint me to the problem in this? Thank you very much I am trying to achieve something like this:     This image is linked from .  also provides a solution and seems simpler. Both answers deal with the algorithmicx package however. I am interested in the solution for the algorithm2e package.   I read the documentation of the algorithm2e package but didn't find an answer.   How can I achieve the colored effect?  EDIT:  Here is sample code to create a minimum working example.  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[ruled]{algorithm2e} % http://www.ctan.org/pkg/algorithm2e  \begin{document}  \begin{algorithm}[h]  \caption{Evolutionary algorithm}   initialize population \;  \For( \emph{Evolutionary loop}){$g := 1$ to $G_{max}$}  {     do things \;     evolve population \;  }  celebrate \; \end{algorithm}  \end{document} I have a beamer frame with about 150 slides on it.  I want article and handout mode to only show frame 92.    Reading section 8.6.2 of the beamer manual it seems like I should be able to do something like  \begin{frame}&lt;handout:92&gt; ... \end{frame}   but that seems to have no effect--all 150 slides are set in handout mode, overlaying (making the result unreadable).  I have gotten the effect I want by taking all commands within the frame that have an overlay specification and adding "| handout:0" to make them not appear in handout mode.  Annoying, but works.  But for my 150-slide frame the different slides are generated by a PGF \foreach loop so I can't code slide 92 differently from the rest.  But can I do this at the frame's overlay specification?  It seems that the frame's overlay spec really acts differently from other commands.  If I only do  \begin{frame}&lt;92&gt;...\end{frame}   then I get only slide 92 in beamer mode but all slides in article or handout mode. Beamer Presentation: Figure has no number? I am giving a presentation and therefore I am using the  class. I have included some figures and it works, but there is no number after "Figure".  My code:  \documentclass{beamer}  \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{listings} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage{eso-pic} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{url} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{multirow} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{booktabs} \usepackage{wallpaper} \usepackage{bbm} \usepackage{cooltooltips} \usepackage{eso-pic} \usepackage{everyshi} \usepackage{calc} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{ifthen} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{animate} \usepackage[singlespacing]{setspace} \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \usepackage{enumerate} \usepackage{hyperref} \newenvironment{changemargin}[2]{%   \begin{list}{}{%     \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%     \setlength{\leftmargin}{#1}%     \setlength{\rightmargin}{#2}%     \setlength{\listparindent}{\parindent}%     \setlength{\itemindent}{\parindent}%     \setlength{\parsep}{\parskip}%   }%   \item[]}{\end{list}}  \setbeamercolor{frametitle}{fg=red,bg=white}  \hypersetup{pdfpagemode=FullScreen} \renewcommand*{\UrlFont}{\normalfont}  \usetheme{Goettingen} \useinnertheme{circles} \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty  \setbeamerfont{page number in head/foot}{size=\large} \setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number]   %%% \begin{document}  \frame[plain]{ \titlepage }  \setbeamertemplate{background canvas}[default]  \frame{ \frametitle{}  \begin{figure} \begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=0.2]{varweakness} \caption{VaR as a quantile} \end{center} \end{figure}  }   \end{document}   Which gives the following frame with the figure:    (I am not sure what is causing the problem, therefore I did not delete any package.)  How can I get a number, e.g. Figure 1:? Allow users to put their e-mail in posts? Should I edit out the (thankfully obsfucated) e-mail address from this ?  Is this something we should allow on the site going forward?  I don't care about the "thank you" or "hello", but this might lead to an answer being sent by e-mail, which would mean it wouldn't be peer reviewed (for what that's worth), and the answer would be lost to the community.