contains ten links to other posts on the Stack Exchange network. On Meta Stack Exchange, bare links like these are replaced by the question titles. However, on that particular post, it stopped working after the fifth link:    When you edit the post, you see in the preview that all links are rendered, even though it takes a while:     seems to imply that it's by design, since that post links to more than 5 different Stack Exchange sites. In that case, the markdown preview should exhibit the same behaviour.
This is probably easier to show than tell...   On the recent question , I see the following:    As you can see, the first five links render properly, but after that, they stop converting.  Unfortunately, this isn't obvious to the person writing the post, which I discovered when I went to edit the post to fix the "broken" links. In the edit window, it renders all of the links just fine:    I understand that this behavior is expected based on balpha's answer :        Links to questions on the same site are unlimited.   Links to other sites are limited to             a) 5 linked-to sites and     b) N questions per target site, where N is 200 on meta sites and 10 on non-metas (this is about the site that the post containing the link is posted on, not the site that is being linked to)         So if this rule is still going to stay in effect, please fix the edit view to also not automatically convert more than five linked-to sites to help people writing posts know that they need to manually title the links to the other questions.  That said, I'd prefer that (at least on MSE) this limitation be removed or raised. Even in the answer, balpha says:     The restrictions are currently as follows, but note that they do look a bit contrived, resulting from the fact that they have grown over time (from single site to cross-site, from "there are no subsites" to "facebook.SO", etc.), so it's not unlikely that we'll revisit them.   So, if it's not hurting performance, can we please increase the limit or remove it?
I was doing some practice problems that my professor had sent us and I have not been able to figure out one of them. The given equation is:  $-y^2dx +x^2dy = 0$  He then asks us to verify that:  $ u(x, y) = \frac{1}{(x-y)^2}$  is an integrating factor.   I multiplied through to get:  $\frac{-y^2}{(x-y)^2}dx + \frac{x^2}{(x-y)^2}dy = 0$   However, the partial derivatives of these do not equal each other so I am a bit confused... The Impossible puzzle ("Now I know your product") I am trying to figure out this impossible problem by Martin Gardener and still havent found a suitable solution or link to it     Two mathematicians S and P are discussing two   unknown integers, both greater than 1. S knows only the sum of the   numbers, whereas P knows only their product.:      S: "I see no way you can determine my sum."    P (after a suitable delay): "That didn't help me. I still don't know your sum." S (after   another delay): "Now I know your product." What are the two numbers?   I have seen the answers on the xkcd wiki link for this at  say 13 and 16 and it checks out mathematically but then there are more ambiguous responses and most of the attempts seem brute force rather than logic.  My question is two fold   How to solve this problem logically? Are there more answers then 13,16 or this answer is the only one even as the upper bound k(upper bound on answer) shifts higher Laptop randomly waking up = Hibernate / Low Battery? Why are new sites classified as "uncategorized"? Comment submission broken for comments that end with @username Combining all the address fields into one? Transparent model when exporting fbx file to Unity So I have this shark model which I animated and ready to export it on fbx and transport it to Unity.  But When I put it on Unity, It looks transparent like this.    Many of the solutions online say that the problem is because of my faces, and they told me to recalculate it or something, but normals are just fine. Is there any other solution?  here's the blend file: Do Inverters change the lithium-ion batterie's mA capacity and wattage? let me say if I have a pack of lithium batteries connected in series and parallels, and i want to connect it to an Inverter, BUT...BEFORE I connect it to inverter, lets say it gives out 12 volts "hypothetically" some informations like 3.7 volt batteries, and 2500 mAh,  lets say then the pack gives 12 volts in DC and hypothetically again I calculate it ((still in DC)) is .....  W = V* Amp ... then it means wattage = 11.1 V * 5 Ah which is 55.5 W. then we got 55.5 watts, THEN....after we want to change the dc into ac it gives you 120 volts "please hypothetically" just answer me this, ARE the Wattage And Ampere are remains the same as DC? what would it be the result after AC? Do I use ext4 for all partitions (such as / and /boot)? What are the other formats used for? I'm installing ubuntu onto a new laptop with 24gb SSD and a 500gb HDD. I wanted to put / and swap onto the SSD and /home onto the HDD. Is there anything I shouldn't use ext4 for?  I do not ever intend to dual boot. Ubuntu only. How to copy files into /usr/local/? (permission denied) I'm still a little new to Ubuntu and was wondering how I can copy files, in this case Aptana Studio, to /usr/local/ without being denied.   Is there a way to do it in terminal? Or a way to allow myself permission?  I should add that I am using 10.10 Desktop edition, not server. ref to subsection number only is there a way to reference the subsection part only? Example:  \documentclass{article} \begin{document}  \section{This is my section} For further information see subsection \ref{subsecthree} within this section. \subsection{One} \subsection{Two} \subsection{Three}\label{subsecthree}  \end{document}   Usually gives (without the stars):  1 This is my section For further information see subsection **1.3** within this section.   But I want:  1 This is my section For further information see subsection **3** within this section.   Is that possible?  [Edit] To make it more clear: I am looking for a command that works like \ref, but prints (the arabic number of) the value of the subsection counter at the position of the \label.  ======================= == Solution in LaTeX ==  There is another solution below. This is a different solution I came up with  (I cannot post an answer to my own question, so I put it here):  \documentclass{article}  \newcommand{\labelsubseccounter}[1]{     \renewcommand\thesubsection{\arabic{subsection}}     \addtocounter{subsection}{-1}     \refstepcounter{subsection}     \label{#1}     \renewcommand\thesubsection{\thesection.\arabic{subsection}} }  \begin{document}  \section{This is my section} For further information see subsection \ref{subsecthree} within this section,  which is called \ref{onepointthree}, not \ref{onepointfour}. \subsection{One} \subsection{Two} \subsection{Three}\label{onepointthree}\labelsubseccounter{subsecthree} \subsection{Four}\label{onepointfour}  \end{document}   (I would like to insert the compiled code, but don't know how, sorry) (semi)-Automatic pluralization around a citation the and thee (I prefer to pronounce it as thuh all the time) My question is can I always pronounce THE with thuh instead of thee? Because unlike "a" "an" rule, pronouncing "thee" seems cumbersome for some people (including me) Note that I know the "emphasis" and "vowel, consonant" rule about THE but I still prefer to pronounce it as thuh everytime. So can I?? I have found that for only one page (so far) the spacing between the header and content is different from the spacing on all the other pages. You can see this behavior in the images below (from pages 2 and 3 of the document):     My .tex file contents are shown below.  \documentclass[a4paper]{report} \usepackage{fullpage} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \pagestyle{fancy} \setlength{\headsep}{0.5cm}  \begin{document} \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.4pt} \renewcommand{\chaptermark}[1]{\markboth{\thechapter. #1}{}} \fancyhead[L]{\bfseries \leftmark} \fancyhead[R]{\bfseries \rightmark}  \chapter{Version Control} \lipsum \lipsum \lipsum \lipsum  \end{document} Localizing Dynamic Plural Noun messages (e.g. "5 Items Processed") on iPhone using Objective-C I've had a couple of answers today where the OP indicated via a comment that I solved their problem, but the question wasn't upvoted or accepted.  In both cases the person probably wasn't able to upvote since they were new, but they could have accepted my answer. I felt a little guilty asking them to accept the answer, but since it solved their problem I felt that it would help others who stumbled on the question trying to solve their own problem to know that my solution really was the answer. Is asking the OP to accept your answer when they've said that it solved their problem a reasonable thing to do or does that feel like nagging for reputation? Vim-latex adds extra brackets when typing empty brackets Tracing a monochrome image into a 3D, extruded object with a script As the photo - Variable 'n' has already been declared.  I've tried clearing my cache, as well as using a new user profile with no extensions, but it doesn't work.  Might be useful to know so it can be fixed before more people are using Chrome (If it's SO's fault of course!) Para 5, , by      If the Lord would show thee but this one   thing, -- that to use "thee" and "thou" to a particular person is   proper language, and Scripture language; and that to say "you," is   improper, and arose from pride, and nourisheth pride, and so is of the   world, and not of the Father; and thou should bow thy spirit to him in   this one thing, thou little thinkest what a work it would make within thee, and how strongly the spirit of darkness would fight against thy   subjection thereto. The Lord lead thee as he seeth good, and give thee   faithfully to follow; for else, if the Lord should lead in any thing,   and thou not follow in that thing, his Spirit would be grieved and   vexed thereby, and thy heart in danger of being hardened by the   deceitfulness of sin.   What is the Lord giving thee faithfully to follow?   The grey claims that the reader thinks little of the significance of stressing 'thee' and 'thou' over 'you'. So I'd guess that the Lord is giving 'thee' this caution? If I'm right, why is there no direct object in the bolded? I recognise grammatical differences in the 1600s, but still want to learn.