So, I know that there are a lot of questions about good books on quantum mechanics and I have read each one of them, and I go on and bought Griffiths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. But the fact is that it did not build me a very good intuition as it emphasized the computational part of it.    So, I want a book that emphasizes on both intuition and mathematical rigor in the same way. I am thinking about the books of Dirac, Shankar, Zettili, Landau and  Claude Cohen-Tannoudji (with Frank Laboe).    So what are your opinions about them and which one strikes the balance on intuition and mathematical rigor?    If you know other books that emphasize on both, tell me.
I'm really interested in quantum theory and would like to learn all that I can about it. I've followed a few tutorials and read a few books but none satisfied me completely. I'm looking for introductions for beginners which do not depend heavily on linear algebra or calculus, or which provide a soft introduction for the requisite mathematics as they go along.  What are good introductory guides to QM along these lines?
Has anyone successfully embedded their  on a WordPress.com-hosted blog?  The free hosted version of  (not )  from all posts before publishing. So they to strip out just about anything I can add to embed my Stack Overflow flair.  Note: I'll be switching to a paid, hosted site in the future (fixing the problem), but I'm looking for a quick, short-term solution. Table of Contents with Chapter I'm attempting to modify the Table of Contents in my document. Currently, chapter one in my document is listed as   1   Introduction   What I would like to see is  Chapter 1   Introduction   Seems like an easy enough thing to ask for, but can't seem to find a good way to do this. Any feedback would be most appreciative. I'm studying for actuarial exams, but I always pick up mathematics books because I like to challenge myself and try to learn new branches.  Recently I've bought Topology by D. Kahn and am finding it difficult.  Here is a problem that I think I'm am answering sufficiently but any help would be great if I am off.  If $d$ is a metric on a set $S$, show that  $$d_1(x,y)=\frac{d(x,y)}{1+d(x,y)}$$ is a metric on $S$.  The conditions for being a metric are $d(X,Y)\ge{0}, d(X,Y)=0$ iff $X=Y$, $d(X,Y)=d(Y,X)$, and $d(X,Y)\le{d(X,Z)+d(Z,Y)}$.  Thus, we simply go axiom by axiom.  1)  Since both $d(x,y)\ge{0}$ and $1+d(x,y)\ge{0},$ it is clear that $d_1(x,y)\ge{0}$.  (Is this a sufficient analysis?) 2) $d_1(x,x)=\frac{d(x,x)}{1+d(x,x)}=\frac{0}{1+0}=0$. 3) $d_1(x,y)=\frac{d(x,y)}{1+d(x,y)}=\frac{d(y,x)}{1+d(y,x)}=d_1(y,x).$ 4) $d_1(x,y)=\frac{d(x,y)}{1+d(x,y)}\le{\frac{d(x,z)+d(z,y)}{1+d(x,z)+d(z,y)}}=\frac{d(x,z)}{1+d(x,z)+d(z,y)}+\frac{d(z,y)}{1+d(x,z)+d(z,y)}\lt\frac{d(x,z)}{1+d(x,z)}+\frac{d(z,y)}{1+d(z,y)}=d_1(x,z)+d_1(z,y).$  However, #4 is strictly less, not less than or equal to, according to my analysis, so where did I go wrong? I have a script that reads a text stream and generates a file of sed commands that is later run with sed -f. The generated sed commands are like:  s/cid:image002\.gif@01CC3D46\.926E77E0/https:\/\/mysite.com\/files\/1922/g s/cid:image003\.gif@01CC3D46\.926E77E0/https:\/\/mysite.com\/files\/1923/g s/cid:image004\.jpg@01CC3D46\.926E77E0/https:\/\/mysite.com\/files\/1924/g   Assume the script which generates the sed commands is something like:  while read cid fileid do     cidpat="$(echo $cid | sed -e s/\\./\\\\./g)"     echo 's/'"$cidpat"'/https:\/\/mysite.com\/files\/'"$fileid"'/g' &gt;&gt; sedscr done   How can I improve the script to ensure all regex metacharacters in the cid string are escaped and interpolated properly? I am writing a small KOMA-Script scrartcl document with multiple sections. In the table of contents, LaTeX fills the current line with dots between the end of the section name and the page number. Is there any way to customize this behavior? I would like to reduce the space between the single dots (i.e. use more dots in the same space). How to remove a repository? Let $f$ be a bounded measurable function on a set of finite measure $E$.  For a measurable subset $A$ of $E$, show that $\int_A f = \int_E f \cdot \chi_A$     Lemma: Let $f$ be a bounded measurable function on a set of finite measure $E$.  Suppose $A$ and $B$ are disjoint measurable subsets of $E$.  Then $\int_{A \cup B} f = \int_A f + \int_B f$.   My first approach was to view the problem like this utilizing the above lemma:  $$\int_E  f \cdot \chi_A = \int_{E\setminus A} f \cdot X_A + \int_A f \cdot \chi_A $$  I'm not really sure how the result follows from the above. How do I run two commands in one line in Windows CMD? What causes 5 pink bars on 27" iMac (2011)? I've got a 27 inch iMac made in 2011 that displays 5 pink vertical bars on the screen. It won't boot properly. I ran the Apple Hardware Test and it came up clean.   Machine Specs:  Apple Subfamily:    Mid-2011  Apple Model No: A1312 (EMC 2429) Model ID:   iMac12,2 Is it lenses which make your photographs, not camera bodies? Best books for mathematical background? What are the best textbooks to read for the mathematical background you need for modern physics, such as, string theory?  Some subjects off the top of my head that probably need covering:   Differential geometry, Manifolds, etc. Lie groups, Lie algebras and their representation theory. Algebraic topology. What is the purpose of the EBP frame pointer register? How to use my aliases in my crontab? Buy a second seat in order to bring an extra bag? Are drops in Google ranking common after switching to https? About a week ago I made the switch to https on one of my sites. I'm positive I did everything right. Properly setup 301 redirects from http to https versions. Added and verified https version in Webmaster Tools. Updated all internal links. Submitted new sitemap.  Despite that, many of my pages (about 40%) lost their rankings almost immediately. Those that dropped went from page 1 to nowhere. I can still see them indexed if I search for the URL, but otherwise it's like Google doesn't know they exist.  SSL Labs shows an "A" when I run their test and I have no manual actions showing in Webmaster Tools.  This is really frustrating. I don't actually need SSL, but Google finally scared me into it. Now I'm regretting the switch and contemplating going back to non-secured URLs.  Anything else I could have missed? How do I install applications in Ubuntu? Explaining two-tailed tests I am looking for various ways of explaining to my students (in an elementary statistics course) what is a two tailed test, and how its P value is calculated.  How do you explain to your students the two- vs one- tailed test? Proof that the set of irrational numbers is dense in reals Providing command key-value arguments with commas in value When using commands that allow using key-value pairs, how can one provide an argument value that has commas in it? As an example, say I'm using the \newacronym command from the glossaries package as below:  \newacronym[firstplural = Alphas, Bravos, and Charlies (ABCs), plural = ABCs]{ABC}{ABC}{Alpha, Bravo, Charlie}   Unfortunately, the comma is used to separate key-value pairs so the Bravos, and Charlies (ABCs) portion doesn't get parsed correctly. Is there a way to overcome this? How to solve a difference equation? So I have the difference equation $4y_{k+1} = 2y_k$.  I need to solve this equation, first with the initial condition $y_0 = 0$ and then with the initial condition $y_0 = 2$.  The professor wrote on the answer sheet that applying iteratively the recurrence relation it is easy to check that:  $y_k= (1/2)^k y_0 $.  Since I missed the lecture where he explained this, can somebody explain how to come about with this question?  I imagine that once I get the equation, then the initial condition $y_0 = 0$ gives us the particular solution $y_k = 0$. Thus the other initial condition $y_0 = 2$ is verified by the solution $y_k = 2(1/2)^k$.  Any help on how to get to the equation $y_k= (1/2)^k y_0$ will be appreciated.