Consider the following code:  \begin{filecontents}{biblio.bib}   @article{Key1,     title = {First title},     author = {First author},     shorthand = {ShortHand},     keywords = {shorthanded}   }    @article{Key2,     title = {Second title},     author = {Second author}   } \end{filecontents}  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[style=numeric]{biblatex}  \addbibresource{biblio.bib}  \begin{document}  My text cites both \cite{Key1} and \cite{Key2}.  \printbibliography[keyword=shorthanded]  \printbibliography[notkeyword=shorthanded]  \end{document}   Here I print two distinct bibliographies differentiating by keyword, and the first kind of entries happen to be referenced by shorthands (conference names).  As you can see from the output, the large spacing due to the shorthand in the first bibliography is retained when printing the second.    This appears nice in the MWE, but in my real document the two bibliographies are printed on separate pages anyway (separate chapters* in a book class), so the vertical alignment is not needed, and the wasted horizontal space in the second one is annoying and useless.  How can I reset the second call to \printbibliography so to independently reserve the right horizontal space for its entries?
Current situation: I'm required to cite "normative" documents (read: standards and manuals) separately from articles and books etc. Using biblatex and biber with the numeric style I'm doing that by issuing multiple printbibliography commands like so:  \usepackage[style=numeric,backend=biber,bibencoding=utf8]{biblatex} %... lots of stuff \printbibliography[type=standard,title=Standards \&amp; Manuals] \vskip\baselineskip \printbibliography[type=manual,heading=none] \printbibliography[nottype=standard,nottype=manual]   which gives a heading Standards &amp; Manuals, prints a list of manuals, leaves a bit of space then the list of standards and finally, under a new heading Bibliography gives books and articles etc. Thus far everything is fine, enter:  The Problem: I'm using the shorthand field in my database for the standards and manuals which works perfect as far as output within the text is concerned and sets the shorthand as the label in the bibliography and prints the details to the right of it - problem is: my shorthands are considerably longer than the labels generated by the numeric style, but even though they're in three different \printbibliography commands, everything gets indented to the maximum width of the label, making the part for books and articles look quite ridiculous.  The following shows the problem with only two separate \printbibliography (and an obviously exaggeratedly long shorthand):   Now  what I would obviously want is for each of the \printbibliography commands to only use the indentation actually necessary to accommodate the largest label appearing within, i.e. rendering the Manuals section as above, but the Bibliography section like follows:   Can anyone help me to achieve this? Or give me some pointer where to look?  The above was produced with the following MWE on an up-to-date TeXLive 2014:  \documentclass[10pt,british]{scrbook}  \usepackage{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{lmodern}  \usepackage{filecontents} \begin{filecontents*}{\jobname.bib} @manual{HowTo,     title = {How to Make the World Go Round},     shorthand = {HowToMakeTheWorlGoRound},     publisher = {The Publisher},     year = {2000} }  @article{Article,     author = {Author, A. and Buthor, B.},     journal = {Journal Title},     pages = {113--126},     title = {The Article},     volume = {65},     year = {1900} } \end{filecontents*}  \usepackage[style=numeric,backend=biber,bibencoding=utf8]{biblatex} \addbibresource{\jobname.bib}  \usepackage[hidelinks]{hyperref}  \begin{document} \let\cleardoublepage\relax \chapter{The Document} Nothing to see here, but we refer to the \parencite{HowTo} based on a principle discovered by \textcite{Article}.  \printbibliography[type=manual,title=Manuals] \printbibliography[nottype=manual] \end{document}
Are the PUT, DELETE, HEAD, etc methods available in most web browsers? Now that I've reached 2k on Stack Overflow, I get access to the "Suggested Edits" review queue.  Although I only have 20 edits per day, the "suggested edit awaiting" icon in the top bar is always there and it bothers me a lot!  My suggestion is to apply one of three solutions:   Remove the suggested edits icon when we reach the maximum (50) edits Remove the Highlight (orange) on the suggested edits Remove the suggested edits part when we click on it   What do you think? When can lands be tapped? How to set Oracle's Java as the default Java in Ubuntu? Convergence of an alternating series : $ \sum_{n\geq 1} \frac{(-1)^n|\sin n|}{n}$ Study the convergence of $$\displaystyle \sum_{n\geq 1} \frac{(-1)^n|\sin n|}{n}.$$   I am stuck with this series, we need probably some measure of irrationally of $\pi$, unfortunately I am unfamiliar with this. So here is my attempt :  Let $f(x) = \sum \frac{|\sin{n}|}{n} x^n, |x| &lt; 1$  It's not difficult to compute the Fourier series of $|\sin(x)|$ :  $$ \displaystyle|\sin(x)|=\frac{2}{\pi}-\frac{4}{\pi}\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}\frac{\cos(2nx)}{4n^2-1} $$  Then Fubini's theorem () works very well (because the previous series converges absolutely at $x$ fixed ) and all calculations made, we find that for all $x\in( -1,1)$:  $$ \displaystyle f(x)=\frac{2}{\pi}\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}\frac{x^n}{n}-\frac{4}{\pi}\sum_{p=1}^{+\infty}\frac{x^2-2x\cos(p)}{(4p^2-1)(x^2-2x\cos(p)+1)} $$  However, the second sum I have not been able to show the convergence. I feel the series diverge because the following series $$ \displaystyle\sum\frac{1}{p^2\sin^2\left(\frac{p}{2}\right)} $$  diverge because  $0$ is an accumulation point of $\displaystyle (n\sin(n))$ sequence.  Any ideas (for the original series) ? What is the reasoning that leads one to postulate this second form for the relativistic particle action? The action for the free relativistic particle with worldline $\gamma : I\subset \mathbb{R}\to M$ is  $$S[\gamma]=-m\int d\lambda\sqrt{-\dot{\gamma}^a(\lambda)\dot{\gamma}_a(\lambda)}\tag{1} $$  Now, one may postulate a second action  $$S'[\gamma,\eta]=\frac{1}{2}\int d\lambda \bigg(\eta(\lambda)^{-1}\dot{\gamma}^a(\lambda)\dot{\gamma}_a(\lambda)-\eta(\lambda)m^2\bigg).\tag{2}$$  These are classically equivalent actions.  My question is: usually what we have is (1) and we have a problem both with the square root and with the massless limit. Given this, how could we think about postulating (2)? In other words, how can we reach (2)?  Usually some people answer this by saying: "it doesn't matter, actions are postulated, you postulate it, compute the equations, prove it works and its over".  Now I beg to differ. I want to know how could someone reason exactly in order to know what to postulate.   I am perfectly comfortable with computing the equations of motion. I want to know is how given (1) we would have the idea to postulate (2).  Is it some special case of some general procedure that deals with constraints? glob() - sort array of files by last modified datetime stamp App keeps crashing & rendering error since update to 1.0.68 I can reproduce that every time now, I go to a site, open an article, then to the next site, open another article. The Feed page pops up for a second, the article page lays over this with some some transparent areas (see picture). The same app-version is ok on a Smartphone with Android 4.4.2. I also sent in some bug reports.    Edit  1.0.71 isn't the solution yet. I go to Meta SE, then to an article. When I want back to Meta SE again, it crashes. Much earlier than before. I already sent in a bug report for this.  Another Edit  I can describe it better now. From the questions-page of a site I go to a post. When I use the back button, everything is ok, I can go to the next site. When I try to go to the next site directly from the post, it crashes. This only happens on the Nexus 10 with Android 5.1.1, App version 1.0.71. Hope this helps.  Edit3  This is fixed in 1.0.73 now. Thanks again. Let $f$ be continuous on $ [a,b]$, differentiable on $ (a,b) $ and $ f(x) \neq 0 \forall x \in (a,b) $ Prove $ \exists c \in (a,b) $ such that I'm setting up a child theme in WordPress and I can't make add_action to be fired within functions.php.  Functions.php is called and I can run code from within. Any idea on what I'm doing wrong?  $debug_msg = "Hi there!";  function test_function() {     error_log($debug_msg, 0);  } add_action('init', 'test_function', 20); Revert new tab page behavior in Google Chrome 29+ I don’t like the behavior of the new tab page in Google Chrome 29+. How can I restore the old behavior?  The new tab page (if you have Google set as the default search engine) now shows the Google logo (or, apparently, the doodle of the day if there is one), a search box, and a few recently visited websites. It also added an Apps button to my favorites bar, seemingly the only way to access my apps page, which has easy access to things I use regularly (Calendar, Gmail, Docs, G+, Facebook, Feedly, Google News, Netflix, Play Music, Pandora, Drive, Keep, etc.) I don’t like this behavior. I actually don’t mind having the logo of the day and search box, but I want my apps linked to on my new tab page.  Is there any way to get the old behavior back? I checked the settings and it doesn’t seem like it’s possible to set chrome://apps to be the new tab page (which would restore the old behavior) or to configure the new new tab page to display apps instead of recently visited sites. QGIS3 - Clipping polygons to a hemisphere for azimuthal orthographic projection I'm a bit of a novice with QGIS, so this is really throwing me for a loop.  For the maps I'm intending on making, an azimuthal orthographic projection would be my preference.   For example, one map I'm trying to recreate is this map of the Pacific islands :    I've been using the NaturalEarth Quick Start package, which has been a really good launching-off point, but I'm running into some issues at the horizon of the orthographic projection.  I've tried adding a custom projection:  +proj=ortho +lat_0=0 +lon_0=170 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +a=6371000 +b=6371000 +units=m +no_defs   But that gives the following map:    Which certainly is close to being right, but the ocean is obviously being cut off in the Arctic and on the southern horizon.  I understand the issue is that naively mapping layers described in WGS 84 to an orthographic projection leaves you with artifacts at the horizon, but how do I fix it?    I first tried to use the Clip to Hemisphere plugin described in , but it seems incompatible with QGIS 3; when I try adding the plugin, QGIS3 gives an error message and places it in the "Invalid" section of the Plugins window.    I then tried both solutions presented at  Again the issue is with QGIS 2/3 incompatibility.    For Solution 1, both Numerical Digitize and CAD Tools are again incompatible with QGIS 3 and give the same result as Clip to Hemisphere.    For Solution 2, I can't disable on-the-fly-reprojection in settings since that setting was removed in QGIS 3. Equivalence of conditions for Convergence of Non-negative Random Series Question  Let $X_n\geq 0$ be independent for $n\geq 1$. The following are equivalent.  $\sum_{n=1}^\infty X_n&lt;\infty$ a.s. $\sum_{n=1}^\infty[P(X_n&gt;1)+E(X_nI(X_n\leq 1)]&lt;\infty$ $\sum_{n=1}^\infty E(X_n/(1+X_n))&lt;\infty$   My attempt I was able to prove $(1)$ implies $(2)$ and $(2)$ implies $(3)$ but not $(3)$ implies $(1)$. For $(1)$ implies $(2)$, observe that by Borel-Cantelli $\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(X_n&gt;1)&lt;\infty$, else $X_n&gt;1$ infinitely often w.p.1 so that $(1)$ is violated. To see that $\sum_{n=1}^\infty E(X_nI(X_n\leq 1)]&lt;\infty$, apply Kolmogorov three-series theorem (I think). For $(2)$ implies $(3)$ we can write that $$ \begin{align} \frac{X_n}{1+X_n}&amp; =\frac{X_n}{1+X_n}I(X_n\leq 1)+\frac{X_n}{1+X_n}I(X_n&gt;1)\\ &amp;\leq X_nI(X_n\leq 1)+ I(X_n&gt;1). \end{align} $$ Now take the expectation of both sides and sum on $n$ using $(2)$ to conclude $(3)$. For the last implication $(3)$ implies $(1)$, I tried to use Kolmogorov three series theorem. To this end put $Y_n=X_nI(X_n\leq 1)$. First note that $\sum_{n=1}^\infty P(X_n&gt;1)&lt;\infty$ since $$ P(X_n&gt;1)\leq P\left(\frac{X_n}{1+X_n}&gt;\frac{1}{2}\right)\leq 2E\frac{X_n}{1+X_n} $$ by Markov's inequality. But I am unable to show that $\sum EY_n&lt;\infty$ and $\sum\text{Var}(Y_n)&lt;\infty$. Any help is appreciated. Height and minimal number of generators of an ideal How can I determine the height and the least number of generators of the ideal $ I=(xz-y^2,x^3-yz,z^2-x^2y) \subset K[x,y,z] $?      I tried to calculate the dimension of the vector space $I/I\mathfrak m$ with $\mathfrak m=(x,y,z)$, but I'm not able to find it.  I think the height is $2$, because the affine variety should be a curve, and also I know that the ideal is prime, so I need a chain $0\subset \mathfrak p \subset I$. Maybe $(xz-y^2)?$ Is it prime? Transparent background but solid title bar and text in Windows 7 I'd like to have a terminal like the one in Ubuntu where the background is transparent but title bar and text is still solid. I have tried Console, but setting the alpha value makes the entire window transparent, which makes the text hard to see.  Is that possible? Up to now I don't understand well what \null actually is and when we need it. I have only known that it can be used to create hypothetical anchors as follows.  \documentclass{article} \usepackage[a6paper,margin=2cm]{geometry} \parindent=0pt  \begin{document} \hfill xport \hfill\null\\ \null\hrulefill{} never \hrulefill\par \hrulefill{} dies. \hrulefill\par \hfill really? \hfill\null\par   \newpage \null \vfill \hfill The End \hfill\null \end{document}    What is \null and when do we need to use it? Why do \hrulefill and \hfill need starting \null when they follow \\ but not need \null when they follow \par? Why does \hfill always need ending \null but \hrulefill not need it? Installing Wi-Fi driver for Realtek Semiconductor RTL8723DE Device [10ec:d723] Behave as if it was or it were You can place the script in the head or body as you like. The   script will behave as if it was located exactly where you put the   script tag in the document.   The sentences above are taken from  (at the very bottom). I think they made a grammatical mistake here: it should be behave as if it were rather than it was. I'm not 100% sure, so want to confirm it. What is the fundamental group of $(\mathbb{C} \setminus {\{0\}})~/~\{e,a\}$, where $e$ is the identity homeomorphism and $az = -\bar{z}$?  Clearly this is homeomorphic to the half cylinder , which is homotopy equivalent to the half circle.  But what is the fundamental group of the half circle? Show: $ f(a) = a,\ f(b) = b \implies \int_a^b \left[ f(x) + f^{-1}(x) \right] \, \mathrm{d}x = b^2 - a^2 $