Color of active link on blue background Image here in Meta SE, makes it less visible Today I signed up for Meta SE and first thing that made uneasy to use was the color of the active link on blue background image. Can it me improved or changed if someone else also think the same?
You are here, but where's here? I find the .youarehere a styling for the main navigation links causes the text to be a little difficult to read on the also-blue header background. Could we give it a little bit of background colour or something else that would provide more contrast?  For example:    which is the product of the following CSS*:  .nav ul li {     margin: -2px 10px 0 0;     padding: 5px; }  .nav ul li.youarehere {     background-color: rgba(0, 80, 112, 0.25);     border-radius: 5px; }  .nav ul li.youarehere a {     color: #A1E9FF; }   *For bonus points, also reduce the line height for the codeblocks!
Does Stack Exchange use caching and if so, how? I'd like to generate unique random numbers between 0 and 1000 that never repeat (i.e. 6 doesn't show up twice), but that doesn't resort to something like an O(N) search of previous values to do it. Is this possible? Background not changing using gsettings from cron I'm trying to change my wallpaper to a random image using Indrajith Indraprastham's suggested script here:    When I run the script from a terminal window, the bg changes just fine, but when it's run from cron, I'm mailed this error:     (process:21901): dconf-WARNING **: failed to commit changes to dconf: Error spawning command line 'dbus-launch --autolaunch=00216c114dcf433c9bb9009985d607d6 --binary-syntax --close-stderr': Child process exited with code 1   I would appreciate any suggestions. How to show textures in the 3D View editor? I have added some textures to objects in blender but the textures don't show up until I render the file. it can be difficult to know what the objects look like without rendering it. is there a way to have textures show in the editor even if they are at a lower res?  In editor:    Rendered: What does the bracketed capital letter indicate in the revised version below? Is it essential, per the rules of proper punctuation, to do so? Are the ellipsis points (i.e., the spacing of the dots) spot on in that sentence to indicate the omission of one or more sentences?  Original quotation  "It need hardly be said that shortness is a merit in words. There are often reasons why shortness is not possible; much less often there are occasions when length, not shortness, is desirable. But it is a general truth that the short words are not only handier to use, but more possible in effect; extra syllables reduce, not increase, vigor."  Revised quotation  "It need hardly be said that shortness is a merit in words. . . . [S]hort words are not only handier to use, but more possible in effect; extra syllables reduce, not increase, vigor."  Thank you. I was browsing PhD position offers in Europe on different websites and I was quite surprised to find that several offers contained sentences such as     University of X value equality and diversity. We strongly encourage women and BAME applicants for this position.    where BAME stands for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnicities; or     The research group aims to increase the number of women in scientific positions. Female candidates are therefore encouraged to apply.   Is it considered normal in the academic environment to discriminate between  candidates according to their race and/or gender for "egalitarian" reasons?   How is the choice of a candidate based on their gender and/or race considered "egalitarian"? I have read that positional parameters start at $1 (for example: $1, $2, $3 and so on are positional parameters). But $0 is not a positional parameter.  But why $0 is not a positional parameter?  I think this could be a reason, but not sure:  Positional parameters only take their values when a script is executed. For example: if we do ./myScript Hello, then $1 will have the value Hello. But $0 can take its value on two occasions: when a script is executed (it would have the value of the script name), and when bash itself is executed without a script (it would have the value bash or -bash). Do downvotes on Meta truly mean something different? It is often said that voting on Meta means something different than voting on regular sites. Upvotes mean "I agree", and downvotes mean "I disagree".  However, I submit that this is not the case. Downvoting of a question has one effect in particular: censorship.  Once a question reaches -8 votes, it disappears from the front page. It can still be found; it isn't deleted. But all it takes is a net 8 downvotes for a question to be more or less lost without a direct link.  You might say that a net 8 downvotes obviously means that the community doesn't agree or want that. Well... does it? Particularly on polarizing issues, a question can temporarily get -8 votes as different people come online and see it. Maybe certain people with a certain belief all see it at once and downvote it a lot.  The front page is how most people find stuff they want to talk about, vote on, or answer. Removal from the front page means that most people will not find it without being pointed directly to it. Once a question hits -8, it is unlikely to be upvoted again. Edits will be irrelevant, new answers won't matter. The question is basically exiled.  The problem is that, on polarized topics, fast mass downvoting can quash any idea that is not popular with the most active members. After all, the most active members are the ones who are most likely to be online and see it. If a bunch of MSO regulars see it and downvote it, it goes away. Someone who checks MSO maybe once a day is less likely to be able to catch the question before it is exiled. This gives undue power to members who are most active on MSO, simply because they have more free time to spend on MSO.  I think this is a significant problem for polarized topics. It becomes very difficult to adequately discuss something that a significant number of active members dislike, even if the community at large doesn't mind.  Consider . It currently stands at +9/-8. Initially, in the first few hours, the question was heavily downvoted and even closed. However, after a day, it was upvoted and reopened.  This shows that a question can initially have a negative response, but later get a positive one. And you can check; any edits I did to the question were relatively minor. The question posted as is was initially negative, but ultimately positive.   If that -8 happened to all come first, odds are good that the +9 and the reopen would never have happened. Those 9 people would never have had the chance to weigh in on the subject. And that's wrong.  It is wrong for someone's potential vote to not matter just because they don't visit MSO multiple times in a day. It is wrong for someone's potential vote to not matter just because they have a different sleep schedule from many of MSO's members.  The problem is one of timing. Heavy dislike from active members who quickly see the question and downvote it can kill a question before someone who might upvote it ever even sees it.  I suppose the best suggestion would be to either lower the -8 threshold (or remove it altogether) or keep it from kicking in until 1-2 days has passed. If the question isn't active, it'll already be off the front page. And if it is active, then enough people will have seen it to know if the threshold represents a real consensus or just the fast-acting few. bash history for current session Maybe I'm overlooking something but is there a way to get your current bash history for the current session you are using like  if i run  ssh host $ pwd $ ls $ cd /tmp   I just want to see those 3 commands and nothing else invalid EFI file path on windows 8 Find an equation in spherical coordinates for the surface represented by the rectangular equation The rectangular equation is $$x^2+y^2-8z^2=0$$ $$x^2+y^2=8z^2$$ Know in the relationship between rectangular and spherical coords. we can manipulate our given to fit the form: $$x^2+y^2+z^2=9z^2$$ $$\rho=x^2+y^2+z^2, \space z=\rho\cos(\phi)$$ $$\rho^2=9\rho^2\cos^2(\phi)$$ $$1=9\cos(\phi)$$ $$\frac{1}{3}=\cos(\phi)$$ $$\arccos(\frac{1}{3})=1.23 \space rads$$ And so the equation in spherical coords. is $\phi=1.23$ I know my math is correct but I have the wrong answer so I'm not sure where I went wrong. How to pass parameters to query? Is abstract algebra (mostly?) restricted to $2$-ary operators? How to prove $\bar{m}$ is a zero divisor in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ if and only if $m,n$ are not coprime When are "if" and "whether" equivalent? Are if and whether equivalent in sentences like the ones below?     How to determine if my saddle is too high?   How to determine whether my saddle is too high?         We should check if everything is okay now.   We should check whether everything is okay now. How to calculate the Fourier transform of a Gaussian function? I would like to work out the Fourier transform of the Gaussian function   $$f(x) = \exp \left(-n^2(x-m)^2 \right)$$  It seems likely that I will need to use differentiation and the shift rule at some point, but I can't seem to get the calculation to work. Does anyone have any advice?  By the way, I am using   $$\mbox{FT}(f)(k)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)e^{-ikx}\,\mathrm d x$$  as my definition of a Fourier transform. Many thanks. What is wrong with the following "proof" that $e=1$? Let's analyze this expression   $\lim_\limits{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+\frac{1}{n})^n$  It's the definition of $e$ which, as we know is not equal to $1$. So what is wrong with the following "logic":  As $\lim_\limits{n\rightarrow\infty}(a_{n}b_{n}) = \lim_\limits{n\rightarrow\infty}(a_{n})\times\lim_\limits{n\rightarrow\infty}(b_{n}) $ and $\lim_\limits{n\rightarrow\infty}(1+\frac{1}{n}) = 1$, we can say that $\lim_\limits{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+\frac{1}{n})^n=1^n$, which is equal to $1$.  I know something's wrong there, but the question is - what? undelete big files - mission impossible? I've accidentaly deleted outlook.pst (6.7GB) file, while there was only 400MB free space left on primary NTFS partition (winxp).  I've tried several recovery tools to get this file back. "Ontrack Easy Recovery Pro" found 0 pst files (complete scan mode), while "Recover My Files" in sector scan mode found 5 pst's, but 4 of them of sizes from 3 to 28 KB, while the 5th one - 1Gb.  I've managed to succesfuly recover 1Gb pst file, which was 1 year old copy (the one used after the latest windows reinstall).  Now, I'm frustrated and confused   Why 1 year old file was succesfuly recovered if there were only 400MB left on primary partition? Where's 6.7GB file gone? I did some reading (), and it seems that there's almost no probability to retrieve the file I'm looking for, but wait - none of recovery tools i've used found zero-sized pst file, moreover - if due to fragmentation a file might be corrupted - we could use scanpst.exe to fix some errors and survive with 10 or 100 emails missing - whatever. Could you please recommend some more sophisticated recovery tools for this particular task?   Appretiate your help - thanks in advance What is the Total Reputation field on Area51? What does the total reputation field on Area51 represent?  It's obviously not the total of the user's reputation on the various sites, as that is the number listed as user reputation. Mac App Store: Downloads just don't start (Mojave) I want to download apps in the Mac App Store and the apps won't start to download. As you can see in the pictures below, the spinner starts spinning but nothing gets downloaded, the download simply doesn't start. I am logged in with my account. I tried logging out of the App Store and logging in again, restarting the Mac etc, nothing helped.  This is a relatively fresh installation of Mojave 10.14. Before with High Sierra 10.13 everything worked fine. It's a Late 2013 MacBook Pro 13". Installations are allowed from App Store and identified developers.   Some screenshots from Console output below.