Traveling on honeymoon to Seattle from San Antonio - Am I too fat for seat? I am getting married this year.  My fiancé and I want to spend our honeymoon in Seattle. However I am extremely stressed out that I will not fit. I weigh about 315 pounds and am 5'5".  I am not an experienced flyer so any advice would be greatly appreciated.   Which airline is plus-size friendly?
How big is "too big" for an airline seat? At what point will you be required to buy two tickets? As I said in another question, I'm bringing my parents to visit me here in Sweden next year.  My mother is around 280-300 pounds and 5'6" (130-135kg, 1.67m). I am concerned that she might be asked at the airport to buy a second seat. If it's likely I would rather just buy the second seat in advance, because I don't want her to be embarassed/humiliated by some random employee. As well, I won't be there, they will be travelling alone and aren't used to dealing with airports and they won't know what their rights are.  In terms of how it will affect other passengers, it's not important, she will get a window seat and my dad will sit in the middle seat, so I don't see it affecting anybody.   She insists it's fine, "the last time I flew I fit easily!" but that was 20 years ago when she was half the size.   They will be flying BA or SAS, definitely not Ryanair.  So - where is the cutoff? Is a 300 pound 5'6" woman going to be too big to fit in a single airline seat? Or am I worrying about nothing?
Circuit tester trips new GFCI I replaced a non-protected receptacle with a GFCI type and now my circuit tester trips the GFCI as soon as it is plugged in.  The receptacle tested fine before replacement, ground, neutral, hot, etc.  I've double checked the hot/neutral/ground connections.  I've also tried it with the downstream load disconnected.   The GFCI trips the moment I plug in my circuit tester (before pushing the test button).  Otherwise things check out OK.  I can plug in a power tool without it tripping.  Also, the integrated test/reset button work correctly.   I've read that the integrated test button is the only one that truly matters. Is this correct or should I be concerned? I'm sure a home inspector will red flag this if their tester has the same result.  Update  My tester is by "Commercial Electric".  The tester is one of the palm sized three prong type with three leds to indicate the condition of the circuit and a button on top to test GFCI. It's new from the local box store. Solution for PHP / MySQL website loading fast in multiple regions Possible Duplicate:          I would like to know if when I'm writing about a "user" (in the broad sense), what do I use? Example: "from the user’s perspective, saving a file is very easy; ? only needs..."  What is correct: she, he, she or he, or they. How can I reduce the gap between the subfloat and its caption? I tried to use   \captionsetup[subfigure]{aboveskip=0pt}    but it doesnt work for me. Below is the snippet i have and the output  \begin{figure} \captionsetup[subfigure]{labelformat=empty} \captionsetup[subfigure]{aboveskip=0pt}     \centering     \subfloat[Ground Truth]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-1-gt.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \subfloat[Recurrent Neural Network]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-1-rnn.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-1-vrnn.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-0.5\baselineskip} \noindent\rule{14cm}{0.4pt}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-3-gt.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-3-rnn.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-3-vrnn.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-0.5\baselineskip} \noindent\rule{14cm}{0.4pt}         \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-1-gt.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-1-rnn.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-1-vrnn.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-0.5\baselineskip} \noindent\rule{14cm}{0.4pt}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-3-gt.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-3-rnn.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \subfloat[]{{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ood-ms/ood-3-vrnn.png} }}     \\ \vspace{-1\baselineskip}     \caption{}     \label{fig:ms} \end{figure}   Here is the output MS word: a macro to turn ON/OFF some proofing settings What macro could turn ON/OFF some proofing settings? (Unfortunately macro recording doesn't record the setting change)  I'm looking for a way to turn ON/OFF 2 proofing settings (at the same time):    check spelling as you type mark grammar errors as you type Proper way to do "conditional segue" in iOS5 Alternative to Adobe Illustrator Can you recommend a good alternative to Adobe Illustrator?   I am learning vector based graphic design, but I am not ready to make such a large investment as to purchase a copy of Adobe Illustrator. Also, Illustrator might be a little more power than I need at the moment. I am using a Macintosh. Pros and cons of rooting using apps ("Soft Root") compared to other methods ("Hard Root") There are quite a few app based rooting methods. A recent review , points to some of them and there may be more apps, paid or otherwise.  From what I understand,   Plus Points   Ease of rooting Don't need a laptop or computer   Minuses   Based on exploits, so may not work if exploits are denied by OS updates Difficulty in unrooting (as I see on some forums for my device Huawei Honor 6)   Questions:    What are the pros and cons apart from above?  If a device has both options - app based rooting and rooting by methods by developers, which one should I opt for?   Note: I am not seeking app suggestion or recommendation. How to use hook_node_presave to change field's value What identifies an action-reaction pair of forces? This is a question on a worksheet that I'm giving to a student:  A man of weight $W$ steps into the lift. The lift then moves downwards with a constant speed. If $R$ represents the force acting on the man by the lift floor, which of the following statements is/are correct? (3) $R$ and $W$ are an action-reaction pair according to Newton's third law  Why isn't this statement (3) correct? I have been reading Hamilton Chapter 13 and he has the following state space representation for an ARMA(p,q). Let $r = \max(p,q+1)$.Then the ARMA (p,q) process is as follows: $$ \begin{aligned}  y_t -\mu &amp;= \phi_1(y_{t-1} -\mu) + \phi_2(y_{t-2} -\mu) + ... + \phi_3(y_{t-3} -\mu) \\ &amp;+ \epsilon_t + \theta_1\epsilon_{t-1} + ... + \theta_{r-1}\epsilon_{t-r+1}.  \end{aligned} $$ Then, he defines the State Equation as follows:   $$  \xi_{t+1} = \begin{bmatrix}      \phi_1 &amp; \phi_2 &amp; \dots &amp; \phi_{r-1} &amp; \phi_r \\      1 &amp; 0  &amp; \dots &amp; 0 &amp; 0  \\      \vdots &amp; \vdots &amp; \dots &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\      0 &amp; 0 &amp; \dots &amp;1 &amp;0 \end{bmatrix} \xi_t  +  \begin{bmatrix}      \epsilon_{t+1} \\     0\\\vdots  \\     0       \end{bmatrix}  $$  and the observation equation as:  $$y_t = \mu + \begin{bmatrix}      1 &amp; \theta_1 &amp; \theta_2 &amp; \dots &amp; \theta_{r-1} \\     \end{bmatrix} \xi_t. $$  I do not understand what the $\xi_t$ is in this case. Because in his AR(p) representation it is $\begin{bmatrix}      y_{t} - \mu \\     y_{t-1} - \mu\\\vdots  \\     y_{t-p+1} - \mu       \end{bmatrix}  $ and in his MA (1) representation it is $\begin{bmatrix}      \epsilon_{t} \\     \epsilon_{t-1}      \end{bmatrix}  $.  Could someone explain this to me a little bit better? Is there any pair of 128-bit strings M and K such that AES$_K$(M) = M?  If yes, how do I go about (efficiently) finding such a pair? Is it possible to install Steam games to two different locations? I want to build a new PC with a smallish SSD.  I'd like to be able to install some of my games onto the drive (those I care about loading quickly or I play frequently), but have the rest of them on a larger, slower drive.  Anybody know if this is possible?  I'm kind of guessing it's not, but figured I'd ask anyway. Edelstein Theorem Let $(M,d)$ be a compact metric space and $d(f(x),f(y)) &lt; d(x,y) $ for all $ x\neq y$ Prove that if $f$ is a continuous fuction then there is a unique $x_0 \in M $ such that $f(x_0)=x_0$ I know that since $g(x) = d((f(x),f(y))$ is continuous then a continuous function in a compact space reaches its maximum and minimum. Then by proving that the minimum of $g(x)$ = 0 can I conclude that $x_0$ is a fixed point? Matrices that commute with all matrices Graphics horribly corrupted on Ubuntu 16.04 in VirtualBox, showing random strips of pixelated colors Whether the players killed a mage and got his spellbook(s) or they met with a nice wizard who let him or her learn a spell from his spellbook, can a player prepare a spell from a spellbook that isn't his or hers?  I'm asking because the PHB p. 114 says:     [...] Preparing a new list of wizard spells requires time spent studying your spellbook and memorizing the incantations and gestures you must make to cast the spell: at least 1 minute per spell level for each spell on your list.    emphasis mine   Further, the block on the left as a Copying a Spell into the Book ("the" Book as in "your" Book, since it appears in the block titled Your Spellbook), which explains how you can copy a spell from one book to another, assuming the book is from a stranger, it cost more and takes more time. It actually says:     [...] deciphering the unique system of notation used by the system of notation of the wizard who wrote it. [...]   It continues saying that you have to learn the various parts of the spell (verbose, material, gesture.)  This makes it sounds like a wizard would have a really hard time to prepare a spell from another's spellbook. Is that the case? Should a function have only one return statement? Removing and adding permission using numerical notation on the same line This has happened to me many times in the last 5 years: an upgrade broke my system. Each time I end up with this situation, I have to reinstall the whole system, which is really annoying.  Is there any way to roll back the most recent upgrade to be able to have a functional system without reinstalling? If not, which is the best way to suggest this as a top priority idea?   I read this idea was described in brainstorm.ubuntu.com, but it feels it is dead... and the forums are full of examples of upgrades breaking things, that's why I feel something needs to be done about this topic. Thanks!