Could please help me to figure out the difference between talk to or talk with someone?  Thanks a lot for help))
Possible Duplicate:          Well, the question is in the title. I always had the impression that "talk to someone" refers to situations when some information must be conveyed to someone else, while "talk with someone" refers to cases that involve a more complex two-sided interaction. E.g., I "talk to my colleague" to tell him that I'm going for a lunch break (no response is required apart from maybe an acknowledgment), while I go and "talk with my colleague" if I have to discuss something with him in detail. Is this correct, or is there any difference between the two phrases, or is there no difference at all?
Add a property to a JavaScript object using a variable as the name? How to say that the phone is held between shoulder and ear? What are common phrases an English native speaker would use for the pose of speaking on the phone where you use your shoulder to keep the receiver against your ear (and mouth), so your hands are free?  I have some ideas, but they all sound wooden, and I don't think I've ever heard anyone describe this pose in words. It's also pretty much impossible to google for a pose or look it up on leo.org or other dictionaries.  OK, since people keep asking for what phrasings I found, I'll provide two, though I was hoping I could avoid influencing people who answer here by not providing them: "balance on one's shoulder", "held/nestled/sandwiched between shoulder and ear". From Geneva airport to Lausanne station On September 4, I will be arriving in Geneva by airplane at approximately 11 AM. After that, I need to go to Lausanne. I have two questions:   Do I need to buy a train ticket online, or can I buy it directly at the station without any problems? (Problems such as: the trains are always full, it's not permitted to buy a ticket etc.) Moreover, are the tickets only for a specific train or it is like "you can board any train from Geneve to Lausanne with this ticket"? How do I get from the airport to the Geneva train station (as low a budget as possible, I guess walking is not an option though), and how much does it cost?   I'd appreciate answers from people who have been there, but if you're able to find an exhaustive link from any website that's okay too. I understand that the architecture of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Feed forward (FNN) are quite different. And that CNNs use pooling and filters of shared weights over a patch of the image. I am not so clear on the core convolution operator (1):   If anyone could link me to an explanation, I have looked at the Colah blog and Nielsen's online book, and I understand what it is doing but don't understand the convolution operator.  Also, it looks quite similar to the the core FNN function is there and difference? (2).  (1) convolution operator is $a^1 = \sigma(b + w*a^0)$ which is equivalent to:  $a^1 = \sigma(b + \sum^4_{l=0}\sum^4_{l=0}w_{l,m}a_{j+l,k+m})$  (2) feed forward operation:  $a^1_i = \sigma(\sum^n_{j=1}w_{ij}x_j +b_i)$  Many thanks  Sources: functions taken from: How to configure logback to skip logging messages from org.package.* with all levels below WARN? Were I rich, I would live on Long Island.   If I were rich, I would live on Long Island.   Is the first sentence still used, or is used in particular contexts (in example, to give emphasis to the sentence)? Ubuntu 17.10 and later: can't change the input switching shortcut to alt+shift By considering:  $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n k^1}{n^{2}} = \frac 1 2$$ $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n k^2}{n^{3}} = \frac 1 3$$ $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n k^3}{n^{4}} = \frac 1 4$$  Determine if this is true: $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n k^m}{n^{m+1}} = \frac 1 {{m+1}}$$  If it is, prove it.  If it is not, evaluate $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n k^m}{{m+1}}$. Proving two entire functions are constant. Let $f$ and $g$ be entire functions such that $f^n+g^n=1$, where $n\geq 3$ is an integer. Prove that $f$ and $g$ are constant.  I suppose I should somehow prove that either $f$ or $g$ is bounded so that I can apply Liouville's Theorem, but I don't see how. I tried setting the derivative of the left hand side equal to zero and work with that but that did not seem to work. The intuition I have for why quantum computing can perform better than classical computing is that the wavelike nature of wavefunctions allow you to interfere multiple states of information with a single operation, which theoretically could allow for exponential speedup.   But if it really is just constructive interference of complicated states, why not just perform this interference with classical waves?  And on that matter, if the figure-of-merit is simply how few steps something can be calculated in, why not start with a complicated dynamical system that has the desired computation embedded in it. (ie, why not just create "analog simulators" for specific problems?) How can I find the difference between two angles? Replacing strings in files based on certain search criteria is a very common task. How can I    replace string foo with bar in all files in the current directory? do the same recursively for sub directories? replace only if the file name matches another string? replace only if the string is found in a certain context? replace if the string is on a certain line number? replace multiple strings with the same replacement replace multiple strings with different replacements Currently, when someone suggests an edit, they are unable to keep track of it without watching reputation levels or constantly refreshing the page. What I would like is a notification, that shows up like the notification where someone has edited your question, that shows whether a suggested edit has been approved or rejected after the last vote is cast. This way, the community can be notified when their edit has been rejected/approved, while focusing their efforts on another question/answer. I get double question marks when referring to labels inside figures I have some charts embedded in figures, and I want to be able to refer to them easily using the "Figure x" notation. I'm doing it like this (in this order):  \documentclass[12pt,letterpaper]{article}  ...  \section*{Results} ...we performed a linear regression to obtain a standard curve  (Figure~\ref{0:stdcurve})....  \pagebreak \section*{Results (Graphs)} \subsection*{Construction of Standard Graph for PNP} \begin{figure}[h]   % Figure 1     \centering     \includegraphics[scale=1]{kinematics-res/graph0-1}     \caption{The standard curve for PNP.}     \label{0:stdcurve} \end{figure}   However, instead of getting the output "...to obtain a standard curve (Figure 1)...", I just get "...to obtain a standard curve (Figure ??)..."  I also noticed that the PDFLaTeX compiler is generating warnings saying that it couldn't find the reference of the name 0:stdcurve. Why am I getting these warnings? How to check a large backpack? When travelling on airlines based in the US with a large backpack, I prefer to carry the bag onto the plane as part of my hand baggage allowance.  Most foreign flag carriers, however, have a significantly more restrictive hand baggage allowance.  I was caught off guard by this one time on New Zealand airlines and received my backpack with multiple broken straps and clips.  I managed to repair it, and I'm still using the same pack, but I would like to avoid so many broken parts in the future.    Once, when flying Alitalia (flight was actually booked through Delta) I carried plastic wrap to the airport, and wrapped the entire bag in it before handing it over to the airline.  @jpatokal recommends putting it into a giant, heavy-duty garbage bag in his answer to .     What are the pros and cons of using plastic wrap or a garbage bag?   Can anyone recommend any other, more effective techniques? If $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A^2$, then either $\sqrt{\lambda}$ or $-\sqrt{\lambda}$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ $A$ is an $n\times n$ matrix of complex numbers. Prove that if $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A^2,$ then $\sqrt{\lambda}$ or $-\sqrt{\lambda}$ is an eigenvalue of $A.$    If $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A^2,$ we have $\lambda\alpha=A^2\alpha$ for some $\alpha.$ Then how can we find a $\beta$ s.t. $\sqrt{\lambda}\beta=A\beta?$ What's your preferred way of getting current system status (current CPU, RAM, free disk space, etc.) in Python? Bonus points for *nix and Windows platforms.  There seems to be a few possible ways of extracting that from my search:   Using a library such as  (that currently seems not actively developed and not supported on multiple platform) or something like  (again no activity since 2007 it seems and no support for Windows). Using platform specific code such as using a os.popen("ps") or similar for the *nix systems and MEMORYSTATUS in ctypes.windll.kernel32 (see ) for the Windows platform. One could put a Python class together with all those code snippets.   It's not that those methods are bad but is there already a well-supported, multi-platform way of doing the same thing? Two seasonal periods in ARIMA using R I'm currently using R to predict a time series with these instructions:  X &lt;- ts(datas, frequency=24) X.arima &lt;- Arima(X, order=c(2,1,0), seasonal=c(1,1,1)) pred &lt;- predict(X.arima, n.ahead=24) plot.ts(pred$pred)   As you can see I've data each hour, and I chose the seasonal period of 24 (one day).  I would like to improve my forecasting using an additional seasonal period in order to include the seasonal component of the week (seasonal length of 7*24=168 data)  Is there any method for this? How do you do it?  UPDATE: I've read  (your) blog page, maybe can I use the external regressors to simulate a second seasonal period? What are reaching fouls in the NBA? When a player tries to steal the ball from a dribbling player, the referees sometimes award a "reaching foul". I just can't see any difference between a steal and a foul Here's the problem: if $S = \mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^2)$, compute the group  of automorphisms $\mbox{Aut}(S)$.   First off, I have the solution and I know it's isomorphic to the multiplicative group $\mathbb{Q}\backslash\{0\}$, so I'm trying to understand it. It uses what is called the substitution principle and the fact that the restriction of any endomorphism $\phi: \mathbb{Q}[x]\to \mathbb{Q}[x]$ to $\mathbb{Q}$ is the identity. It says that these two facts implies that the endomorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ are in 1-1 correspondence with $h \in \mathbb{Q}[x]$, where the endomorphism corresponding to $h$ is $\phi_h : \mathbb{Q}[x] \to \mathbb{Q}[x]$ given by $\phi_h(f) = f(h)$ for $f \in \mathbb{Q}[x]$. I guess I just don't understand how it applied the substitution principle? It's probably obvious, but for some reason I am not getting it.  An explanation would be greatly appreciated! Or if you have a different solution, that'd be cool too. Thanks!!