My codeigniter mail was working fine for few days. but from yesterday onwards the mail is going to spam for company emails. but it is going to inbox in yahoo and gmail accounts. i tried using phpmailer, sendgrid etc. and also tried sending mail from gmail as well but stil these mails are going to spam.   i came to know that email sending to email_id@my_domain.ae is sending emails to spam folder.   is there any modifications that are to be made in the hosting server or something? my company mails are configered in etisalat.  This is the code i am using:             $config = Array(                'protocol' =&gt; 'smtp', # 'sendmail',                'smtp_host' =&gt; 'ssl://smtp.googlemail.com',                'smtp_port' =&gt; 465,                'smtp_user' =&gt; '******@gmail.com',                'smtp_pass' =&gt; '******',                 'mailtype' =&gt; 'html',                'mailpath' =&gt; '/usr/sbin/sendmail',                'charset' =&gt; 'iso-8859-1'            );            $this-&gt;load-&gt;library('email', $config);            $this-&gt;email-&gt;set_newline("\r\n");            $this-&gt;email-&gt;from($from_email, 'IT Support');            $this-&gt;email-&gt;to($to_email);            $this-&gt;email-&gt;subject($subject);            $this-&gt;email-&gt;message($body)-&gt;set_mailtype('html');            $this-&gt;email-&gt;send();
This is a tricky one and I've always relied on techniques, such as permission-based emails (i.e. only sending to people you have permission to send to) and not using blatantly spamish terminology.  Of late, some of the emails I send out programmatically have started being shuffled into people's spam folder automatically and I'm wondering what I can do about it.  This is despite the fact that these particular emails are not ones that humans would mark as spam, specifically, they are emails that contain license keys that people have paid good money for, so I don't think they're going to consider them spam  I figure this is a big topic in which I am essentially an ignorant simpleton.
Sometimes, when I upgrade a system via do-release-upgrade, the update process fails and the script tells me to finish the process manually via dpkg --configure -a. This is a not serious problem - after manually solving the dependencies problem and the finishing upgrade process all works well.  But the do-release-upgrade script has a cleanup process after finishing the upgrade:  Remove obsolete packages?   XXX packages are going to be removed.   Continue [yN]  Details [d]y   which removes some obsolete packages from old version of system.  Seems that this process doesn't execute when the automatic upgrade fails and I finish upgrade manually, so obsolete packages from old version remain installed in the system.  How I can run the "Remove obsolete packages" process manually after finishing the upgrade by hand? Adjoint pairs, triplets and quadruplets Often we have adjoint pairs $(A, B)$ (meaning $A$ is left adjoint to $B$). Sometimes we have adjoint triplets $(A,B,C)$ (meaning $A$ is left adjoint to $B$ and $B$ is left adjoint to $C$. No adjoint relation between $A$ and $C$ obviously, since they have the same source and target).  So the first question is: can we have quadruplets $(A,B,C,D)$ ? (meaning that $C$ is also left adjoint to $D$).  Second question: It would be then possible that we have $(A,D)$ besides $(A,B)$. But I think not, because I think that it is not possible to have a functor $A$ with two different right adjoints, $B$ and $D$. Is this correct? I played 1st and 2nd edition AD&amp;D a lot back in the day. But when 3rd edition came out, I dropped out of the hobby. Partly I just couldn't be bothered to re-learn the rules. The conversion systems, previews and material for 3rd edition I was seeing in Dragon and Dungeon magazines made it look like a very major change.  I recently picked up the new 5th edition starter set on a whim. Obviously the starter set rules are very stripped down in comparison to the full rules, but nevertheless, I was amazed by how comfortable and familiar the system felt. The only thing that felt like a truly radical change was the way things like thief skills and the like were now handled with a d20 instead of a percentage system.  There's plenty of information online (and here) comparing editions of the game in an incremental manner. But I'd be interested in a breakdown of how 2nd and 5th edition compare directly, specifically looking at whether there are broad areas of similarity. What is the capacity of this circuit? I simply can't figure out what the capacity of this circuit is.  I can do the math myself, I just need a hint how to create an equivalent circuit where it is obvious what is parallel and what is in series... Why do some Unicode text messages crash the iPhone OS? Recently a new "glitch" has surfaced over the Internet over the last few weeks where if an iPhone user is sent:    effective.        Power            لُلُصّبُلُلصّبُررً ॣ ॣh ॣ ॣ  冗   via iMessage it crashes the phone OS temporarily and force restarts the receiving phone.  Why does this work? Batch export Photoshop layers to individual PNG files Is there a way to disable the hotkeys? I navigate with Ctrl-n,p,f,b (readline/ keys), so that I don't have to move my hands too much and get  again. Is there a way to disable Ctrl-b being hotkey for bold?  Note that this is not just an Emacs thing. Standard web browsers, like Firefox and Chrome, use things like  Ctrl + K and Ctrl + L to navigate to the Google search bar and address bar respectively. How to replace a video on YouTube Proving $f' = - \frac{\partial{F}/\partial{x}}{\partial{F}/\partial{y}}$ I am trying to prove that, if $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ and $F:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ are differentiable, $F$ satisfying $F(x,f(x))=0$ and $\partial{F}/\partial{y}\ne 0$ then $$f'(x)=-\frac{\partial{F}/\partial{x}}{\partial{F}/\partial{y}}$$  This appears in a section on the chain rule for many-variables functions, but without knowing the details of $F$ I find it very hard to prove much about it.  To the best of my ability to reason about it, I suppose I could say  $$ \frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{x}}=\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{x}}\frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{x}} + \frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{y}}\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{x}}$$  but for more than one reason I doubt that what I have written is correct.  Yet I'm not exactly sure what's wrong about it, nor can I guess what else I could do.  I tried finding the partial with respect to $y$ but got nothing more useful looking than this.  I also tried writing out limit definitions and saw no useful path forward through that. In the category $\mathbf{Set}$ is "the product of an empty set of sets a one-element set"? I was reading  on Category Theory and it said (paraphrased to add context):     Exercise 4: Explain why in $\textbf{Set}$ (the Category of Sets), the product of an empty set of sets is a one-element set.   which I think is incorrect. The product of two empty sets (or any number) is empty because we are considering:  $$ \emptyset \times \emptyset = \{ (a,b) : a \in \emptyset, b \in \emptyset \} = \emptyset$$  where $a \in \emptyset , b \in \emptyset$ are false, so the above is the $\emptyset$ which is NOT a one element set (its a zero element set).   This should be trivial so I am assuming I am somewhere mis reading the natural language of the exercise. Someone help me catch where is it and what the answer should be? i.e. whats being asked and the answer? R: linear regression: very small coefficient and R-squared but significant P values How to get image size (height & width) using JavaScript? Browser back leaves page after going fullscreen in stack snippet Opening a Stack Snippet in full screen should use history.pushState() to add an entry to the browser history stack. Clicking back will then close the snippet rather than leave the page completely. After some searching, I find very little on the incorporation of observation weights/measurement errors into principal components analysis. What I do find tends to rely on iterative approaches to include weightings (e.g., ). My question is why is this approach necessary? Why can't we use the eigenvectors of the weighted covariance matrix? Troubleshoot High CPU usage by the "System" process I have noticed that from some time my system is freezing and its probably caused by the high CPU usage which is caused by the system process.  All applications I'm running is the Skype, TeamSpeak and Chrome so it definitely shouldnt eat that amount of CPU.  You can see the problem itself and running processes in the screenshot below:    Sometimes CPU usage is reaching 90%, but the average usage is like 40-65%.  My PC parameters:   Windows 8 (customer preview) Intel Core i3 - 2350M 8 GB RAM   I'd appreciate any help attempt! Regards.  --UPDATE--  As the user below posted a great answer, I have noticed that the process that is eating the most CPU in the system is called Arthurx.sys, simple google tells that it's a TPLink driver (an wifi adapter, I have bought like 2 weeks ago!) drivers has been installed from the Windows MSDN, but also tried to install the drivers from the attached CD, but it doesn't help. From the system start, it is using like 5% of the CPU only, but after 2-4 hours of working it is growing up and reaching 40-60% of the CPU usage.  Device name: TPLink WN722N I know when evaluated it gives one but I can't figure out how to prove it.  Can anyone help? I believe it requires L'Hopitals rule and taking a natural log but i cannot figure out the exact math. Setting a background image on a JFrame using Swing Automorphism group of the quaternion group Let $Q_8$ be the quaternion group. How do we determine the automorphism group $Aut(Q_8)$ of $Q_8$ algebraically? I searched for this problem on internet. I found some geometric proofs that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to the rotation group of a cube, hence it is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_4$. I would like to know an algebraic proof that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to $S_4$. What is a primary decomposition of the ideal $I = \langle xy, x - yz \rangle$? Given the ring $k[x,y,z]$, where $k$ is a field, and an ideal $I=(xy,x-yz)$, find a primary decomposition of $I$.    I tried to draw the graph of the variety of $I$ and get a decomposition of $(x,y)\cap(x,z)$ (the two prime ideals corresponds to the irreducible components of the variety), but apparently these two ideals are not the primary decomposition of $I$, and I don't know how to fix this.  I would really appreciate it if someone can help me. thx I want to copy any file to my external hard drive. But always when I tried to do this I have next output:  cp: cannot create regular file /media/NameOfCard/[file]' : Read only file system  I also tried:  sudo chmod -R 775 /media/NameOfCard sudo chmod -R 777 /media/NameOfCard   But the same effect - ... Read only file system  Update:   After mount I have next output:  nazar_art@nazar-desctop:~$ mount /dev/sda1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) none on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880) none on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/sdb1 on /media/sdb1 type vfat (rw) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/nazar_art/.gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=nazar_art)   Any suggestions?   How to solve this trouble and let permission to copy and delete files to hard drive?