Does the 2nd ability of Teysa, Orzhov Scion trigger with mass destruction? Let's say  and my ten other black creatures are wiped out with "Wrath of God". Do then 10 white 1/1 Spirits appear on the battlefield even though Teysa has just been destroyed?  Sounds pretty strong to me. Am I right?  Thanks a lot.
What happens when a creature with "Whenever a creature dies" dies simultaneously with multiple other creatures? has the following ability:     Whenever a creature you control with a +1/+1 counter on it dies, return that card to the battlefield under your control at the beginning of the next end step.   I had a number of creatures on the battlefield, including Marchesa herself, with one or more +1/+1 counters on them when  was played, destroying each creature on the board.  When Marchesa and several other creatures would be killed simultaneously,   Does Marchesa's ability trigger for herself? Does Marchesa's ability trigger for the other creatures under my control with +1/+1 counters?   In attempting to resolve the issue, we tried to look things up, leading to , which cites Rule 603.6d as proving that Marchesa's ability should trigger both for herself and for each other creature with +1/+1 counters.  Unfortunately, none of us could actually understand Rule 603.6d, aside from this example:     Two creatures are on the battlefield along with an artifact that has the ability Whenever a creature dies, you gain 1 life. Someone plays a spell that destroys all artifacts, creatures, and enchantments. The artifacts ability triggers twice, even though the artifact goes to its owners graveyard at the same time as the creatures.   The example certainly seems analogous to me, but without understanding the actual rule, rather than just the example, we weren't too sure.  A complete answer has to not only answer the question, but back up that answer with citation and explanation of the official rules on the matter.
Call to undefined function session_register() Let $G$ be a finite group. For each positive integer $m$, if $x^{m}=e$ has at most $m$ solutions in $G$, $G$ is cyclic.   What I have thought is that $n=\sum_{d\mid n}\phi(d)$ can be used to solve this and showing that $|G|$ order element in $G$ exists is enough. What is bracketing? I have seen this term a lot and I was wondering what, in basic terms, what bracketing/autobracketing is.  Also, why would one want to 'bracket'?  P.S. - there are other questions asking what DoF and WB bracketing is but none asking quite the same as this. How To: Execute command line in C#, get STD OUT results Prove that for any square matrix, an invertible matrix B exists, so that BA is triangular I'm given a matrix A, its dimensions are n x n.  I am required to prove that an invertible matrix B exists, such that the product of the matrices BA is triangular.  Any help? I shall come, not will Native speakers, how can you comment such a sentence:  I shall come, not will  Can I use it for  I will definitely come, not maybe    Adding some information other people asked me about.  How I came to such a question.  Here   I asked about "Shall I win?" pointing that it could have some variants of understanding:  1) Shall I win? = Should I win? (suggestion)  2) Shall I win? = Will I win? (archaic with 1st person)  3) Shall I win? = is it 100% that I will win? (predestination\inevitability)  The excellent guy Mixolydian said either variant was possible, that it didn't matter what person you used "shall" with, it could have this "predestination\inevitability" anyway. Out of this we're getting that nowadays we can use "will" for simple future actions and "shall" for almost predicted (almost 100% surety of happening) future actions.  If I want to say to someone:  Don't be afraid, I will come anyway.  Don't get panicked, I will definitely come  Be sure, I will come in any case  I can use "shall" for it meanining an action into which I will put 100% effort:  I shall come!  And what if my original sentence is  Don't doubt, I will definitely come, not maybe or probably  Can I use  I shall come, not will  pointing that "shall" guarantees me putting all my strengths into it while "will" doesn't give any assuarance that I will do everything to finally come.  As I understood, it wasn't very easy to ask such a question because English was different everywhere - US, UK, Australie, Ireland etc. I heard it was acceptabse to use even "thee\thou" in Ireland or somewhere like that while all other world has already forgotten such words...  P.S. What I got from the answers ias that it was better to forget about the existence of "shall" cause it created so many misunderstandings:D Can I include another file in fstab Can I include another file in my fstab file?  I.e. can I have fstab execute lines from another file at an arbitrary point, and then return to the main file when completed? Is there a simple way to convert C++ enum to string? Proving that a normal, abelian subgroup of G is in the center of G if |G/N| and |Aut(N)| are relatively prime. Round a double to 2 decimal places I'm having trouble with this functional equation, to find all functions $f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ for which the following is valid for all $x,y\in \mathbb R$: $f(x) + f(x+f(y)) = y + f(f(x) + f(f(y)))$ I haven't been able to pinpoint any solution, nor to prove surjectivity or injectivity. So 0 progress. Tried with $x=y=0, x=0, y=0, x=-f(y), y=f(x)$, and even with some assumptions on bijectivity, but nothing helped. I don't know the source but seems like a pretty difficult problem, maybe even impossible to solve. I have a profile on AskUbuntu.com which is recognized on my StackEchange profile (). I have already asked and answered questions there. But even though I'm logged in stack exchange, Askubuntu does not see me as logged in. I have a long history of problems with that and though I have been able to access it up to end 2018, and I don't understand why it can't do it anymore. I have seen multiple questions about similar problems, but they all are older than 2018 and do not really helped me solve it. Amongst other, they proposed to log in with the same user and password, but using the same user and password on two different log in systems is a security hole. either your credential cookies are shared, or one should use different logging info. EDIT: it has been suggested to deactivate third party cookies blocking, but I do not want to ruin my browser's tracking protection. Recurrence relation for right-angled triangles stuck-together How to construct a relative path in Java from two absolute paths (or URLs)? Given two absolute paths, e.g.  /var/data/stuff/xyz.dat /var/data   How can one create a relative path that uses the second path as its base? In the example above, the result should be: ./stuff/xyz.dat Why is a normal subgroup of $G_1\times G_2$ with trivial intersections with $G_1$ and $G_2$ is abelian? Let $G=G_1\times G_2$ be a direct product, and let $H\triangleleft G$ be a normal subgroup such that $H\cap G_1=H\cap G_2=\{1\}.$ Then $H$ is abelian.     I considered the commutators of two elements in $H$, trying to show that it must be $1,$ but I don't see how this works. Any hint is very welcomed and appreciated. Thanks in advance. I have a bunch of client point of sale (POS) systems that periodically send new sales data to one centralized database, which stores the data into one big database for report generation.  The client POS is based on PHPPOS, and I have implemented a module that uses the standard XML-RPC library to send sales data to the service. The server system is built on CodeIgniter, and uses the XML-RPC and XML-RPCS libraries for the webservice component. Whenever I send a lot of sales data (as little as 50 rows from the sales table, and individual rows from sales_items pertaining to each item within the sale) I get the following error:  Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 54 bytes)   128M is the default value in php.ini, but I assume that is a huge number to break. In fact, I have even tried setting this value to 1024M, and all it does is take a longer time to error out.  As for steps I've taken, I've tried disabling all processing on the server-side, and have rigged it to return a canned response regardless of the input. However, I believe the problem lies in the actual sending of the data. I've even tried disabling the maximum script execution time for PHP, and it still errors out. I have a question about using the phrase "some kind of _".  Is it incorrect to say "some kind of + plural noun"?     For example, is it wrong to say "are these rock-like things some kind of chocolates?"   I didn't use "kinds" and that kind of adds to my question. Is "kind" always plural, like "some kinds of chocolates"? Because although I'm using "some", it feels like "kind" shouldn't be a countable noun.  Anyway, I don't think I've heard of "some kind of + plural", but I think it makes more sense then using singular, since I think chocolates are countable. Please help! In PCA, when the number of dimensions $d$ is greater than (or even equal to) the number of samples $N$, why is it that you will have at most $N-1$ non-zero eigenvectors? In other words, the rank of the covariance matrix amongst the $d\ge N$ dimensions is $N-1$.  Example: Your samples are vectorized images, which are of dimension $d = 640\times480 = 307\,200$, but you only have $N=10$ images. What is the term for the double consecutive use of a word with stress on one of the words to alter its severity? What is the term when a word is used consecutively twice, with intentional stress placed on the first word, as a means to alter the severity of the word's meaning?  I am not referring to a  (had had) or a  (that that), but to the slightly sarcastic use as demonstrated in shows like Seinfeld. Sample sentences, with emphasis:  I know we're going out to eat, but I am only going to pick at an appetizer because I'm not hungry hungry. Don't wear something so formal to the party; I don't think you need to be dressed dressed.  Of personal note, some of my relatives decided a few years ago to nick-name the term a &quot;Celaine&quot; (a combination of their names) due to their own frequent use of it. Note: This question explicitly requests the term of art used by linguists and English scholars when discussing this phenomenon. This question is different from a  which requests a historical explanation for the phenomenon described by this term. None of the answers to the suggested duplicate provide the term.  The author of the similar question requests the term for the pattern in a comment, but does not receive an acceptable answer. The only mention of an acceptable term is in a comment made by the author of this question, in response to the author of the similar question, directing back to this very question. What is the correct way to install proprietary ATI Catalyst Video Drivers (fglrx) directly from AMD?