When should we use PCA over factor analysis? Aren't they essentially the same thing except that factor analysis is modeling observed variables as linear combinations of unobserved factors? Whereas PCA is modeling components as linear combinations of observed variables?
It seems that a number of the statistical packages that I use wrap these two concepts together. However, I'm wondering if there are different assumptions or data 'formalities' that must be true to use one over the other. A real example would be incredibly useful.
Let $a,m,n \in \mathbf{N}$. Show that if $\gcd(m,n)=1$, then $\gcd(a,mn)=\gcd(a,m)\cdot\gcd(a,n)$. Let $a,m,n\in\mathbf{N}$. Show that if $\gcd(m,n)=1$, then $\gcd(a,mn)=\gcd(a,m)\cdot\gcd(a,n)$.  Proof:  Let $u,v\in\mathbf{Z}$ such that $\gcd(m,n)=um+vn=1$. Let $b,c\in\mathbf{Z}$ such that $\gcd(m,a)=ab+cm$. Let $d,e\in\mathbf{Z}$ such that $\gcd(a,n)=ad+en$.  So $\gcd(a,m)\cdot\gcd(a,n)=a^2bd+cmen+aben+emad$.  Where do I go from here? How to modify a text file? Is there a term for switching syllables of words? Fibonacci addition law $F_{n+m} = F_{n-1}F_m + F_n F_{m+1}$ Determining the Actual Server Create Date I am interested in determining the ages of all 70+ my servers. I would like to create a growth graph showing when servers and databases were added to the environment either/both monthly or annually. I executed the following query using the SSMS multi-query feature with only partial success.  SELECT [name], create_date FROM sys.databases   It's partial success because the master and model databases return with a date of 'April 8, 2003' when I know that I created some of these servers during the past couple years.  I refresh databases from one server to another several times a week, which appears to be causing issues with the database create date.   Is there a simple method to determine the actual create date for both servers and databases? From all the hard drives I have bought, they never seem to be as large as the advertised size; from 320 GB down to 290 GB, from 500 GB down to 450 GB, etc. Is there a technical reason for this? Why did Kattappa kill Baahubali? In ideal gas model,  is the measure of average kinetic energy of the gas molecules. If by some means the gas particles are accelerated to a very high speed in one direction, KE certainly increased, can we say the gas becomes hotter? Do we need to distinguish the random vibration KE and KE in one direction?  Furthermore, if we accelerate a block of metal with ultrasonic vibrator so that the metal is vibrating in very high speed with cyclic motion, can we say the metal is hot when it is moving but suddenly become much cooler when the vibration stop? There's already a question like this  so that my question could be considered duplicate, but I'll try to make my point clear that this is a different question.   Is there a way to derive  from the Lorentz' Force law or just from Maxwell's Equations?   The point is that we usually define, based on experiments, that the force felt by a moving charge on the presence of a magnetic field is $\mathbf {F} = q\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$, but in that case the magnetic field is usually left to be defined later.   Now can that force law be used in some way to obtain Biot-Savart law like we obtain the equation for the electric field directly from Coulomb's Force law?  I wanted to know that because as pointed out in the question I've mentioned, although Maxwell's Equations can be considered more fundamental, those equations are obtained after we know Coulomb's and Biot-Savart's laws, so if we start with Maxwell's Equations to obtain Biot-Savart's having use it to find Maxwell's Equations then I think we'll fall into a circular argument.   In that case, without recoursing to Maxwell's Equations the only way to obtain Biot-Savart's law is through observations or can it be derived somehow? I am not sure of the meaning of this sentence:     The significance of culture and identity in development has to do not so much with the cultural factor in the process of development as with abandoning Eurocentric development thinking.   I'm not sure what the use of as is supposed to convey. Does it mean "development has to do not so much ... as with abandoning", i.e. not as much as abandoning? Does the abandoning have more to do with it?  And the second question: Why does it use "has to do not so much". Why not "has not so much to do"? Is "have to" a verb? GTA V for PC exited unexpectedly I recently ordered the GTA V PC from Steam and when I finished installing and launch the game. It gave me "Grand Theft Auto V has exited unexpectedly". I tried "safe mod" and every option available, but none of them work. I checked some forums and found a lot of people having the same problems. What could be the possible cause? I'm using a laptop with these specs:  CPU: i7 4700m GPU: AMD HD8970M RAM: 8GB  I'm pretty sure my laptop is way beyond the minimum specs. Does someone know how can I enter the game? The following is the first part of Proposition 2.9 in "Introduction to Commutative Algebra" by Atiyah &amp; Macdonald.     Let $A$ be a commutative ring with $1$. Let $$M' \overset{u}{\longrightarrow}M\overset{v}{\longrightarrow}M''\longrightarrow  0\tag{1} $$ be sequence of $A$-modules and homomorphisms. Then the sequence (1) is exact if and only if for all $A$-modules $N$, the   sequence  $$0\longrightarrow \operatorname{Hom}(M'', N)  \overset{\overline{v}}{\longrightarrow}\operatorname{Hom}(M,  N)\overset{\overline{u}}{\longrightarrow}\operatorname{Hom}(M', N)  \tag{2} $$ is exact.   Here, $\overline{v}$ is the map defined by $\overline{v}(f)=f\circ v$ for every $f\in\operatorname{Hom}(M'', N)$ and $\overline{u}$ is defined likewise.   The proof one of direction, namely $(2)\Rightarrow (1)$ is given in the book, which I am having some trouble understanding. So assuming (2) is exact sequence, the authors remark that "since $\overline{v}$ is injective for all $N$, it follows that $v$ is surjective". Could someone explain why this follows?  Given that $\overline{v}$ is injective, we know that whenever $f(v(x))=g(v(x))$ for all $x\in M$, we have $f=g$. I am not sure how we conclude from this surjectivity of $v$.  Thanks! Prove that:   $$p \,\,\left|\, {p \choose k} \right., \quad 0&lt; k \lt p$$   if $p$ is prime.   how to prove that with direct proof? Add an SQLite database to an iPhone app Ubuntu can't be installed on my system because of what the title says. This is because support Intel HD Graphics 530 was only just added in Linux kernel 4.3 and all versions of Ubuntu only have kernel versions up to 4.2 as of 15.10. My computer's processor is the new Intel Skylake 6600K if you need to know, everything else is generic. It has a UEFI BIOS motherboard. Help? Should I use single or double colon notation for pseudo-elements? How to align prices in columns when both 2 digit and 4 digit variations of a price exist? I am trying to display data similar to coinmarketcap with prices for coins, some above 1$ in which case they are rounded to 2 zeroes, some below 1$ in which case they have 4 digits following the decimal. I saw a bunch of posts here where people have suggested to use right alignment for numeric applications/prices  Approach 1 Decimal aligned   1. $13,700.05  2.      $0.0048   Approach 2 Right aligned   1. $13700.05  2.   $0.0048   Which of these approaches do you suggest? Thank you for your time Why are so many important verbs irregular? I'd wish to visit Dubai with my girlfriend, but after reading  and  I started to get a little worried about it. How should I book an hotel? Must I book two singles? Could it be a problem if we walk together in the city and go together to restaurants and malls without being married? Is temperature a Lorentz invariant in relativity?