But having lived in England for the past 3 years I’ve come to realize that this may be one of the reasons people call me ‘crazy’  what does ''having lived'' mean in the sentence?  because I have lived , after I have lived or etc?
Please look at the following sentence        Having lived all my life in India, I can speak Hindi very well.      Does this mean I still live in India, or can it also be used if I have just moved from India to USA? If yes, then can it  also be used if I have been living in USA for 1 year, when I speak these words?      a. Having known her, I can tell she won't be happy.   b. Knowing her, I can tell she won't be happy.   What's the difference between #a and #b? Can #a ever be used, because it is difficult to 'un-know' someone after knowing them. In light of this should always #b be used ?   Also, if I want to say that I have known her 5 years and still know her, then which form must I employ     c. Having known her for 5 years, I can tell she won't be happy   d. Knowing her for 5 years, I can tell she won't be happy.   Thank you.
How do I technobabble without sounding like technobabble? How can I check if /bin/x86_64/bin/ls is a directory in a bash shell script  Here is what I tried:  #!/bin/bash  if [ $# -eq 2 ]; then     if [[ "$1" = /* ]]     then     cd ./bin/x86_64/bin/ls         if [ -d "$1" ]; then             echo "ok"             i="$1"             echo $i         else             echo "error2"             exit         fi     else         echo "error"         exit     fi fi Why can't I log into minecraft with a mojang account? I created a Mojang account and downloaded the Minecraft launcher, but when I started it up, I couldn't log in. Since the log in fields did not require a username, I tried typing in my email, and still couldn't log in. I've tried after resetting my password, but that didn't work either. What am I supposed to do to log in and play? How fill face between irregular curves? Hello Blender Stack Exchange,  I am trying to fill a face between 4 surfaces. Two are straight edges and two are a curved line made up of short vertices that came from a SketchUp export.  The problem: I select the vertices on the top and bottom and fill the hole. It creates a strange face that ruins the curve. I would prefer it create some sort of complex curve. I want it to be smooth.  Images attached to better explain. Why is jumping into water from high altitude fatal? If I jump from an airplane straight positioned upright into the ocean, why is it the same as jumping straight on the ground?  Water is a liquid as opposed to the ground, so I would expect that by plunging straight in the water, I would enter it aerodynamically and then be slowed in the water. Having a UV maping problem, does anyone know what this is, and how to fix it? Let $a,b,c,x,y,z&gt;0$ and $x+ y+ z= 1$. Show that $$ax+ by+ cz\geq  a^{x}.b^{y}.c^{z}$$ I have found the generalization of this inequality: For 2 sets of numbers $\left \{ a_{i} \right \}, \left \{ b_{i} \right \}&gt; 0$ and $\sum_{1}^{n}b_{i}= 1$, we have: $$\sum_{1}^{n}\left ( a_{i}b_{i} \right )\geq  \prod_{1}^{n}\left ( a_{i}^{b_{i}} \right )$$ First solution Simply compare the logs: as the natural logarithm is a concave function, one has $$\ln\bigl(a^x b^y c^z)=x\ln a+y\ln b+z\ln c\le \ln(ax+by+cz)$$ for all non-negative $x,y,z$ such that $x+y+z=1$. How about another solution? I really hope to see that. Thanks! Textbook on the Geometry of Special Relativity I am looking for a textbook that treats the subject of Special Relativity from a geometric point of view, i.e. a textbook that introduces the theory right from the start in terms of 4-vectors and Minkowski tensors, instead of the more traditional "beginners" approach. Would anyone have a recommendation for such a textbook ?  I already have decent knowledge of the physics and maths of both SR and GR ( including vector and tensor calculus ), but would like to take a step back and expand and broaden my intuition of the geometry underlying SR, as described by 4-vectors and tensors. What I do not need is another "and here is the formula for time dilation..." type of text, of which there are thousands out there, but something much more geometric and in-depth.  Thanks in advance. Double-blind review with four references in a row? I've read a lot of answers here about double-blind reviews and thesis or single articles.  My problem comes from having four self-references in my article. I feel that if I include them all, could be very easy to infer that this is the fifth one (It's a 4-year granted project and I have been collaborating in a number of software components inside a bigger architecture, now it's the time to use them all to interact with other applications) . But if I ommit some of them, I could end being accused of self-plagiarism. The other articles have been published in the proceedings of conferences that didn't require double-blind reviews, this is the first submission I make to a conference that asks for it (Maybe because of being CORE A) Also not worthless to mention that I'm going to send it as a short paper, so actually it'd be very helpful to cite rather than to repeat past texts.  What should I do? I just spilt coffee on my laptop, what should I do? FME - Calculate distance of point along a line I have created an FME workspace which inputs a pipeline as well as other linear features which cross it (waterways, roads, railways, fences, other pipelines, etc).  The output is a point file which contains the crossing type.  What I would like to do is calculate the distance along the pipe from the start of the pipeline for each intersection.  So, as you travel along the pipeline, the distance attribute will increase.   I'm thinking that I'll need to use some of the linear referencing tools like MeasureGenerator, MeasureExtractor, or something like that, but I'm not sure how to do so.  Does anyone have an idea of how to do this? When is it useful to include the code in a thesis? I am writing my master of science thesis and I am not sure whether I should add some of the code I have written: they are not proper programs, but more like input files to be fed to a commercial program (Nastran) very popular in my field.  My concerns are related to the fact that I am not making any discovery, just applying the things I have learned reading the manual. Still, I feel the code will make the effort I put into the thesis to also learn this language clearer. Let $\psi: C([0,1]; \mathbb{R}) \mapsto C([0,1]; \mathbb{R})  $, be such that if $x \in [0,1]$ then $$\psi(f)(x) = \int\limits_{0}^{x} f(t) dt $$  I am asked to show that $\psi$ is not a contraction but $\psi^{2}$ is. And then conclude that $\psi$ has a unique fixed point.   I´ve managed to prove a statment that helps me conclude the last part but I´m having trouble proving that the function is not a contraction. This is what I've got.   If $f,g \in  C([0,1]; \mathbb{R})$  then $$ |\psi (f) - \psi(g)| \leq \int\limits_{0}^{x} |f(t)-g(t)| dt \leq \sup\limits_{x\in [0,1]} |f(x)-g(x)| \int\limits_{0}^{x} 1 dt = d(f,g) x  $$ Then $|\psi (f) - \psi(g)| \leq d(f,g) x $,  and taking supremum on the left hand side allows me to conclude that $d(\psi (f),\psi (g)) \leq d(f,g) x$  Is there any problem with this procedure? Does anybody has an insight on how to procede with the $\psi^{2}$ part?   Many Thanks! $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{z^n}{n}$ does not converge uniformly on $\mathbb{D}$. It is required to prove that the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{z^n}{n}$ does not converge uniformly on the open unit disc centered at $0$, i.e. $\mathbb{D}$. Clearly by virtue of the ratio test the series converges pointwise on  $\mathbb{D}$. However I find it difficult to see why the convergence is not uniform. Could someone please give me a hint? How long will foods that have "Best by: XX-XX-XX" on the product last past that date?  I have tried looking online, and all I can find is anecdotal evidence, which isn't very assuring for me since there seems to be no specific "x food will expire y weeks after its best by date".  Is there a rule of thumb or some guide out there that can tell me how long a "best by" food will last? Or is it safe to assume that they never expire, since it's not actually labelled on the product? I was just thinking that maybe if we have more Stack&nbsp;Exchange websites then each person would be a member of more different sites on average. Since the time a person can spend online on average is limited it means he will be spending less time on each website. But would this affect the quality of these websites? I'm not talking only about the quality answers given but also the number of answers given, the promptness. Won't these things go down?  I think that the rate of questions won't go down much because you need to know what you need to know. However, the average time a person spends browsing through these websites (and chances upon a question he can answer) would decrease. So are we creating too many different Stack&nbsp;Exchange sites? Awk: if pattern not found add some text at the end of file How can I recover photo files from a memory card with a corrupt filesystem? I know this is not specifically a photography issue but since many of us with prosumer/professional-level DLSRs use Compact Flash cards, it is bound to happen to others as well.  I have a Sandisk 16GB Ultra card that occasionally had the camera reporting inability to access the card. I had to reinsert the card to continue using it. I was able to read the card and transfer the photo files to my computer drive. Today, the same thing happened again, just that nearing the capacity of the card, it failed one last time and the camera was subsequently unable to read it anymore. Despite reinsertion.  My other CF cards never once exhibited this problem, so it's pretty much isolated to this card.  The card is similarly unrecognisable on my computer CF card reader. I think the filesystem is toast, but I suspect the photo files are still intact. I would like to find ways where I can inspect the raw binary data in the card and hopefully recover the photos? Which Answer to Accept: Better Solution or Answer to Actual Question? Possible Duplicate:          I received two answers to a question I asked. One solution suggested I do things in a completely different manner than I have been. Another acknowledged that the first solution was correct but went on to explain how to do what I was asking.  Should I accept the first answer because it provides the better way of doing things or should I accept the second one because it answers the precise question that was asked? Invalid token 'while' in class, struct, or interface member declaration in very simple code I am not sure what the problem is but I keep receiving this error when I try to use a while statement in my code.     Invalid token 'while' in class,   struct, or interface member   declaration   I want to use a while loop to have something continuously update while a statement is true.  The rest of my code is rather long but whenever I type in the syntax:  while(a&lt;b) { //do whatever i want it to do here }   It gives me that compiler error right off the bat. Not quite sure what the problem is. I am doing this in a C# windows application under the Form1.cs file with all the other event handlers (for buttons and such).  Thanks!    I was unaware that loops had to be placed within a method (fairly new to c#), but I tried it and no errors were returned. Thanks for your help everybody!  Previously, I just had the loop within the main class of the program.