so I want an output like this 5, 7, 23, 15, 6, 3  all random in one line Matrix I know I could do from random import randrange for i in range(5):     print(f' {randrange(50)}')  the problem with this they will not be in one line. so I tried this print(f' {randrange(100)}' * 5) but the output show similar numbers like this 27, 27, 27, 27, 27 any solution?
I'd like to do it in Python. What I'd like to do in this example in C: #include &lt;stdio.h&gt;  int main() {     int i;     for (i=0; i&lt;10; i++) printf(&quot;.&quot;);     return 0; }  Output: ..........  In Python: &gt;&gt;&gt; for i in range(10): print('.') . . . . . . . . . . &gt;&gt;&gt; print('.', '.', '.', '.', '.', '.', '.', '.', '.', '.') . . . . . . . . . .  In Python print will add a \n or space, how can I avoid that? Now, it's just an example, don't tell me I can first build a string then print it. I'd like to know how to &quot;append&quot; strings to stdout.
Can this statistic be shown not to be sufficient for $\theta$? This problem comes from , who do not rigorously demonstrate (in their solution key) that the statistic is not sufficient.  Let $X_1,\dots,X_n$ be a random sample from a population with PDF $f(x|\theta)=\theta x^{\theta-1} \cdot 1_{\{x\in(0,1)\}}$ for $\theta&gt;0$. Show that $\sum_i X_i$ is not sufficient for $\theta$.  If you write out the PDF $p(\vec{x}|\theta)$ of the random sample, it is clear by the factorization theorem that $\prod_i X_i$ or $\sum_i \log(X_i)$ are sufficient for $\theta$; the PDF $p$ also suggests $\sum_i X_i$ is not sufficient for $\theta$. However, to rigorously demonstrate this, we need to analyze $p(\vec{x},\theta)/q(T(\vec{x},\theta)$, where $p$ is the distribution of sample $\vec{x}$, $q$ is the distribution of the statistic $T(\vec{X})=\sum_i X_i$. But finding the distribution of $T(X)=\sum_i X_i$ seems impractical. I have observed that $f$ is the PDF of a Beta($\theta$,1) distribution, but checking online, the distribution of the sum of Beta random variables doesn't appear to have a closed form. Are there any alternative routes (e.g., showing there is no factorization involving $T(\vec{X})$)? Did C&amp;B leave out a full explanation that $\sum_i X_i$ is not sufficient because none actually exist? If I play a spell with {X} in the mana cost, and I have a card out that reduces the casting cost by 2 generic mana, what happens to the X? Does it start at -2?  For example: I have  in play. If I play  for just 1 blue mana, do we draw 2 cards? I'm from Tunisia and I got a Schengen visa from the Austrian Embassy for  28 days, the “duration of stay”, and the number of entries is 1. But the validity of the visa is from 02/08/2015 to 13/09/2015.  Do I have to stay only 28 days, for example from 02/08/2015 to 29/08/2015 or can I stay there until 12/09/2015 ?  And if I have got to stay only 28 days, then can I choose the days of stay, that's mean can I stay in Austria for example from 09/08/2015 to 05/09/2015? Repeating “will” for two verbs with “and” "An SQL Server database schema" or "a SQL Server database schema"? Possible Duplicate:          I got the following sentence from the book I'm reading:     You can take a database-first approach   by first creating a SQL Server   database schema.   From what I learned, I think it should be "an SQL Server database schema", not "a SQL Server database schema". So which one is correct? I happen, time and again, to read and hear people – among which people working in cinema – regretting the fact that film (in the sense of actual reels of plastic strip) is nowadays very rarely used when shooting movies. Is there some ground to such nostalgia?  Of course I am not looking for opinions for or against film vs. digital media, but sourced, objective reasons. Is there anything that could be done with film but not with digital supports? Are there measurable differences in effects on viewers? Is there a way to follow a particular person (or List&lt;Person&gt;) easily? Some people answer the questions in a very educative way, and I don't want to miss them. How do you return 1 value per row of the max of several columns:  TableName  [Number, Date1, Date2, Date3, Cost]   I need to return something like this:  [Number, Most_Recent_Date, Cost]   Query? I  just got these 10 e-mails 5 hours ago from do-not-reply@stackexchange.com:      Recently, you asked a question on [X] Stack Exchange, but you haven't verified your email address yet.      Click on the following link to verify your email and set a password so that you can log in.      Here, [X] refers to all of the following:    GameDevelopment.SE SharePoint.SE Unix.SE  Skeptics.SE Japaneese.SE HomeImprovement.SE SciFi.SE PersonalFinanceMoney.SE  DatabaseAdmins.SE  TeX.SE    I haven't posted on any of these except for TeX.SE, but that was not recently, and through my real account.   =   I asked about this , and was told that someone seems to be impersonating me by using my email. Is it possible for staff to stop this?   Also, I'm pretty surprised there is no measure to stop people from using emails to existing SE accounts (see for example, on wordpress.com, if you use an e-mail which has an existing account on wp.com, you are asked to log in.).    EDIT:  I just got 2 more emails an hour ago for SharePoint.SE, and for AmateurRadio.SE. What should I do if a user posts sensitive information as part of a question or answer? I'm trying to create a pmatrix whose components are rather complicated fractions (Christoffel symbols), and the line spacing is too small making the whole thing a bit cramped and hard to read.  Is there any easy way to increase the spacing (about 1.5 the default would be perfect)? Continuity $\Rightarrow$ Intermediate Value Property. Why is the opposite not true?    It seems to me like they are equal definitions in a way.    Can you give me a counter-example?    Thanks Reconfiguring TexStudio after upgrade to OS X El Capitan Texstudio doesn't work for me anymore after updating to Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan. I have the latest version of TexStudio installed (2.10.2). As pointed out by , this is due to a change in the places OS X allows files to be saved. When I started TexStudio, I received a message "PDFLatex could not be launched". In the settings, I had to change the folder of the compiler from user/texbin/ to /Library/Tex/texbin, as shown in the screenshot below:    Can anybody tell me if I have to make further changes in order to make TexStudio fully working (bibliography and the like), and if yes, which?   I hope TexStudio are very soon going to release an update (there is an issue for this on their issue queue.  Thank you for your help. This is my first post here, so please apologize any imprecisions. In Westeros there are three coins:   Copper Stars (The Seven-Pointed Star is the symbol of the Faith of the Seven.) Silver Stags (The Stag is the sigil of house Baratheon.) Gold Dragons (The Dragon is the sigil of house Targaryen.)   Was the Stag already on the silver coin before Robert became king?  If so, why? Was house Baratheon that important?  If not, what was on the silver coin during the reign of the Targaryen kings?  Why is the sigil of house Targaryen still on the gold coin after Robert took the crown?  Robert hates the Targaryens so much, even murdering innocent children is OK for him.   Keeping this in mind I find it especially strange, that he doesn't change the sigil on most valuable coin. How can a function with a hole (removable discontinuity) equal a function with no hole? I've done some research, and I'm hoping someone can check me. My question was this:  Assume I have the function $f(x) = \frac{(x-3)(x+2)}{(x-3)}$, so it has removable discontinuity at $x = 3$. We remove that discontinuity with algebra: $f(x) = \frac{(x-3)(x+2)}{(x-3)} = (x+2)$. BUT, the graph of the first function has a hole at $x = 3$, and the graph of the second function is continuous everywhere. How can they be "equal" if one has a hole and the other does not?  I think that this is the answer:   Because the original function is undefined at the point $x = 3$, we have to restrict the domain to $\mathbb{R} \setminus 3$. And when we manipulate that function with algebra, the final result, $f(x) = (x + 2)$ is still using this restricted domain. So even though the function $f(x) = (x+2)$ would not have a hole if the domain were all of $\mathbb{R}$, we are sort of "imposing" a hole at $x = 3$ by continuing to throw that point out of the domain.   And then just to close the loop: Removing the removable discontinuity is useful because it allows us to "pretend" that we're working with a function that is everywhere continuous, which helps us easily find the limit. But the reality is that the function $f(x) = (x +2)$ is actually NOT continuous everywhere when we restrict the domain by throwing out the point 3. Or am I now taking things too far?   Thanks in advance!  EDIT: For anyone coming across this in the future, in addition to the excellent answers below, I also found this other question about the  helpful. Can you please clarify if it's acceptable to use these terms interchangebly and if not point out to significant differences between these titles. It seems to me that it may be something with scale of an organization (perhaps, small/medium businesses have managing directors, and large corporations have chief executive officers) but I'm not sure. I do understand that a person may bear one or another of these titles formally, but what about real differences? Continuous function on closed unit ball Take a continuous mapping $f: \bar{B^{n}} \rightarrow \bar{B^{n}}$, where $\bar{B^{n}}$ is a closed unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$. Assume that $f(x) \neq x$ for every $x \in \bar{B^{n}}$. Define another function $r$ by following the directed line segment from $f(x)$ through $x$ to its intersection with $\partial B^{n}$, and let the intersection point be $r(x)$. Is it immediately evident that $r$ is a continuous function? Is so how does it follow? Thanks. By accident, I messed up a configuration file. How do I recover the default version without reinstalling or affecting other things? What's the name for the property of a function $f$ that means $f(f(x))=x$? I can think of several examples of functions such that twice application of the function is equivalent to no application of it.   Additive inverse Multiplicative inverse Fourier transform Complex conjugation Any group built up from $\mathbb{Z}_2$, applying (one of) the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ parts' operation.   "Idempotent" came to mind, but that's wrong. It means $f(f(x)) = f(x)$, not $f(f(x))=x$.  What is the word for this "flip-flop" property? What is the exact difference between fluid and responsive design?