I'm a first time Linux user. My laptop wasn't connecting to the wifi so I followed the instructions from .  On typing sudo apt-get update after that, I got this error:  E: Type 'sudo' is not known on line 2 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list E: The list of sources could not be read.   What can I do?
Every once in a while I see users having issues to update due to errors like this:  E:Type 'ain' is not known on line 1 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/some-ppa.list'   with varying types/line numbers/source list files (often after removing a PPA).  How can such an error be fixed?
Can Clerics have divine power without it being provided by a god? "I saw him crossing" vs. "I saw him cross" I saw him crossing the road.   I saw him cross the road.   Which one is correct and why? Alternating sum of binomial coefficients multiplied by (1/k+1) I'm trying to prove that  $$\sum_{k=0}^n {n \choose k} (-1)^k \frac{1}{k+1} = \frac{1}{n+1}$$  So far I've tried induction (which doesn't really work at all), using well known facts such as  $$\sum_{k=0}^n {n \choose k} (-1)^k = 0$$  and trying to apply identities like  $${n \choose k} = {n-1 \choose k-1} + {n-1 \choose k}$$  Would anyone be able to point me towards the right method? Should I be looking to apply an identity or is there a method I'm missing? What is the shortest way to compute the last 3 digits of $17^{256}$? What is the shortest way to compute the last 3 digits of $17^{256}$ ?  My solution: \begin{align} 17^{256} &amp;=289^{128} \\ &amp;=(290 - 1)^{128}\\ &amp;=\binom{128}{0}290^{128} -  ... +\binom{128}{126}290^2 - \binom{128}{127}290 + \binom{128}{128} \end{align}  Computed the last 3 terms whose last 3 digits gave the last 3 digits of $17^{256}$.  Is there any shorter method to do this(which requires much less computation) ? Change this behavior to allow for spelling corrections and the like: "Edits must be at least 6 characters" Now, it is easy to workaround this: add 10 characters, plus your one-character change, then remove these 10 characters in the next edit for the same post.  But this can hardly be what the designers intended. Instead, my suggestion is to change it to something like on Wikipedia, where you can mark an edit as "minor". Something like this:     Edits must be at least 6 characters, or select the checkbox "Minor, spelling or punctuational correction."   Edits like that will, of course, not count toward the edit-limit (before it becomes Community Wiki).  The suggestion often seen on Meta Stack Overflow is "just edit more in that post". But sometimes the post is just right, and there aren't any other spelling mistakes to correct. Why force a user to change more than necessary, or use an ugly hack? Raster calculator reclass 0 as 0 QGIS I want to process a raster with values 0-16. I want to set all values between 1 and 15 as 1, a value of 16 as 0 and cells with a value of 0 as 0.   How do I maintain a cell value of 0?  I have tried the following:  ("raster_name@1" !=0 AND "raster_name@1" &lt;= 15*1)+("raster_name@1" = 16*0)   Results in: Values of 16 as 0, values 1-15 as 1, values 0 also = 1  I also tried:  ("raster_name@1" !=0 AND "raster_name@1" &lt;= 15*1)+("raster_name@1" 16*0)+("raster_name@1" = 0*0)   Results in: Values of 16 as 0, values 1-15 as 1, values 0 = 2  Please, can you explain how to retain cells with a 0 value as 0? I have a problem when a lot of figures are in question. Some figures tend to "fly around", that is, be a paragraph below, although I placed them before that paragraph. I use code:  \begin{figure}[ht] \begin{center} \advance\leftskip-3cm \advance\rightskip-3cm \includegraphics[keepaspectratio=true,scale=0.6]{slike/visina8} \caption{} \label{visina8} \end{center}\end{figure}   to place my figures. How can I tell latex I REALLY want the figure in that specific place, no matter how much whitespace will be left? "Awesome" vs. "Awful" What is integration by parts, really? Integration by parts comes up a lot - for instance, it appears in the definition of a weak derivative / distributional derivative, or as a tool that one can use to turn information about higher derivatives of a function into information about an integral of that function. Concrete examples of this latter category include: proving that $f \in C^2(S^1)$ implies that the Fourier series of $f$ converges absolutely and uniformly, and the Taylor series expansion with the integral formula for remainder.  However, I don't feel like I really understand what integration by parts is really doing. To me, it is just an algebraic trick that follows from the fundamental theorem of calculus and the product rule. Is there some more conceptual way to think about it?  How do you think about this useful idea? Work is not done by the magnetic field? Permission denied, are you root? What are tag badges? How do they work? Finite Series - reciprocals of sines Find the sum of the finite series $$\sum _{k=1}^{k=89} \frac{1}{\sin(k^{\circ})\sin((k+1)^{\circ})}$$ This problem was asked in a test in my school. The answer seems to be $\dfrac{\cos1^{\circ}}{\sin^21^{\circ}}$ but I do not know how. I have tried reducing it using sum to product formulae and found out the actual value and it agrees well. Haven't been successful in telescoping it. Spam iCloud Calendar Invitations Does the sequence $\{\sin^n(n)\}$ converge? Does the sequence $\{\sin^n(n)\}$ converge?   Does the series $\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \sin^n(n)$ converge? The difference between a poor or meh question and a stellar question can often simply be someone understanding it and providing it a great answer. I can't begin to count the number of times I've justified re-opening a question as a moderator by saying:     Look at the answer it got, though. This isn't something we want deleted, this is something we want fixed, because it's obviously valuable. Someone with domain knowledge can easily edit that question based on the answer it received.   This doesn't only apply to borderline-poor or poor questions – sometimes a good edit means the difference between 100 and 10,000 people finding something through typing things into Google. Good titles are hard.   We think we've come up with a way to provide incentive for good, opportunistic edits to happen more often, ideally without questions needing to go through closure or collecting a centimeter of dust before they do. What if we simply rewarded folks that answered and edited questions with a special, relatively difficult to earn badge?  Let's say that you answer something, and:   You edit the question 12 hours before or after answering it. This allows you to edit now, answer later &mdash; or answer now and edit later, when you have the time. Your edit isn't rolled back, or outright rejected if it was a suggested edit The question is not closed for any reason, even simply being a duplicate Your answer has a score of 1 or higher   &hellip; then you've done something that we probably want to recognize. You understood something, you provided the knowledge that you have, and then you provided an edit to make sure that more people in need of this knowledge can find it, while raising the overall quality of the site.  Here's the proposed tiers for the badge (within the above stated criteria):   Explainer (Bronze): Answered &amp; edited 10  questions Refiner (Silver): Answered &amp; edited 50 questions Illuminator (Gold): Answered &amp; edited 500 questions   We think this is going to be pretty hard to game. You can't go leaving streaks of terse snark all over the place on questions you know are going to be closed anyway, and junk edits aren't going to fly.  We're talking about rewarding folks that take a tiny bit more time out of their day just to write a more descriptive title so that folks can find the awesome answer that they wrote. Just doing that alone can make a big difference. Sure, it's a tad hard to get at the gold level, but it's supposed to be. If you routinely edit questions that you answer and have done so for some time, you'd probably get it the day we roll it out.  While this is technically something that we came up with on the quality initiative ( | ) &mdash; this badge could be earned on all of our sites.  What do you think? What did we miss? What could be better about the idea? A PC in our group was off on his own following a recurring villain of our groups. He was paralyzed where he could move, and the vampire bit his neck. The vampire said "now you get to remain 19 (years old) forever" before he left the cave. This was all done in RP.  We found him later, and healed up his bite marks. Our characters know of vampires, specifically only the one that bit him (recurring villain), but don't really know how vampirism works, because it isn't a super common thing in this world yet.   My question as the player is:  How does RAW vampirism work in 5e?  Is it a disease that develops over time? Is it something where they have to die and be brought back as a vampire? "had they known" or "if they had known" Can this:     These same officials, however, would have been appalled had they known what was going on behind this façade of self-help.   be rephrased as     These same officials, however, would have been appalled if they had known what was going on behind this façade of self-help.   ? How can I display site logo, name and slogan? List of all "partitions"/ "cuttings" of a list