For a very specific example, say you have a software developer who makes some changes to a product, then does no testing of the changes and then releases the product only to find that the customer finds the product no longer works.  The person is too hasty and not diligent enough to follow a careful process.
I would like to use the sentence     He was 'over-eager' to implement his plan, leading to failure.   I am looking for a single word which expresses over-eagerness in a negative sense.  TIA
test class with Batch and Callout I have a problem with FeedItems in my Test class, it's very weird behaviour Does someone explain to me why this happens?  Callout Class  public with sharing class Callout {  public static void runProccess(Case[] records) {     Database.executeBatch(new CalloutBatch(records), 10); }  public static void send(Case[] records) {     Case[] toUpdate = new Case[]{};       for (case record : records) {         HttpRequest req = new HttpRequest();         req.setEndpoint('callout:test/SOME_URL');         req.setMethod('POST');         req.setHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');         req.setBody('');         Http http = new Http();         HTTPResponse res = http.send(req);          Map&lt;String, Object&gt; response = (Map&lt;String, Object&gt;) JSON.deserializeUntyped(res.getBody());          toUpdate.add(new Case(Id = (Id) response.get('Id'), Status = (String) response.get('Status')));     }      update toUpdate;  } }   CalloutBatch Class  global with sharing class CalloutBatch implements Database.Batchable&lt;Case&gt;, Database.AllowsCallouts{  private final Case[] records;  global CalloutBatch (Case[] records) {     this.records = records; }  global Iterable&lt;Case&gt; start(Database.BatchableContext BC) {     return records; }  global void execute(Database.BatchableContext BC, Case[] scope) {     Callout.send(scope); }  global void finish(Database.BatchableContext BC) { } }   Test Class  @IsTest  private class CalloutTest { @IsTest static void shouldReaciveData() {     String status = 'Closed';     Case caseRecord = new Case(Type = 'Web', Status = 'New');     insert caseRecord;      //insert new FeedItem(ParentId = caseRecord.Id, Visibility='AllUsers', Type = 'TextPost', Body = '');      System.assertEquals(0, [SELECT Count() FROM Case WHERE Id = :caseRecord.Id AND Status = :status]);      Test.startTest();     Test.setMock(HttpCalloutMock.class, new CalloutTestMock(caseRecord.Id, status));     Callout.runProccess(new Case[]{caseRecord});     Test.stopTest();      System.assertEquals(1, [SELECT Count() FROM Case WHERE Id = :caseRecord.Id AND Status = :status]); } }   Mock Class  public with sharing class CalloutTestMock implements HttpCalloutMock {  private Id recordId; private String status;  public CalloutTestMock(Id recordId, String status) {     this.recordId = recordId;     this.status = status; }  public HTTPResponse respond(HTTPRequest req) {     HttpResponse response = new HttpResponse();      response.setStatusCode(200);     response.setBody('{"Id": "' + recordId + '", "Status": "' + status + '"}');      return response; } }   This code works, but when I uncomment insert FeedItem in Test Class I receive an error message:     System.CalloutException: You have uncommitted work pending. Please commit or rollback before calling out   Class.Callout.send: line 23, column 1   Class.CalloutBatch.execute: line 20, column 1   FeedItem doesn't have an impact on this functionality, (I don't have any Process Builders, triggers etc. on FeedItem object) It is currently said that MD5 is partially unsafe. Taking this into consideration, I'd like to know which mechanism to use for password protection.  This question,   suggests that hashing multiple times may be a good idea, whereas  suggests using salt.  I'm using PHP. I want a safe and fast password encryption system. Hashing a password a million times may be safer, but also slower. How to achieve a good balance between speed and safety? Also, I'd prefer the result to have a constant number of characters.   The hashing mechanism must be available in PHP It must be safe It can use salt (in this case, are all salts equally good? Is there any way to generate good salts?)   Also, should I store two fields in the database (one using MD5 and another one using SHA, for example)? Would it make it safer or unsafer?  In case I wasn't clear enough, I want to know which hashing function(s) to use and how to pick a good salt in order to have a safe and fast password protection mechanism.  Related questions that don't quite cover my question: $M + N$ and $M \cap N$ are finitely generated $A$-modules implies $M$ and $N$ finitely generated using exact sequences Let $0 \to M_1 \to M \to M_2 \to 0$ be an exact sequence of $A$-modules.  i) Prove: If $M_1$ and $M_2$ are finitely generated, then $M$ is too.  ii) Let $M$ and $N$ be sub-modules of an $A$-module $L$. Assume that $M+N$ and $M\cap N$  are finitely generated $A$-modules. Prove that $M$ and $N$ are finitely generated $A$-modules.  If have proved the first part, but i don't see how to do the second part. I tried to use the first part, so to find an exact sequence with $M$ in the middle and finitely generated modules in place of $M_1$ and $M_2$, but I can't find a surjective map $M \to P$ (for some f.g. $A$-module) in the sequence:  $$0 \to M\cap N \to M \to P \to 0$$  any hints/help would be appreciated. Live refresh shows "modified" on tagged questions even when unmodified Playing a video in full screen after startup How to embed a view in a specific node? I try to embed a view in a specific node. I found tutorials for doing this with Drupal 7 and PHP-Templates:  &lt;?php print views_embed_view('view_name'); ?&gt;   But I look for a way in Drupal 8 with twig-Templates. I tried to call the views_embed_view() function in the hook_node_view() and assign it to the node so that I can print it out in the twig-Template. But it seems that this hook never gets called.  Any hints/solutions how to do this in the Drupal 8 way? Grep: unexpected results when searching for words in heading from man page I'm running into weird behavior when trying to grep a man page on macOS. For example, the Bash man page clearly has an occurrence of the string NAME:  $ man bash | head -5 | tail -1 NAME   And if I grep for name I do get results, but if I grep for NAME I don't:  $ man bash | grep 'NAME' $ man bash | grep NAME   I've tried other uppercase words that I know are in there, and searching for SHELL yields nothing whereas searching for BASH yields results.  What's going on here?  Update: Thanks for all the answers! I thought it worth adding the context in which I ran into this. I wanted to write a bash function to wrap man and in cases where I've tried to look up the man page for a shell builtin, jump to the relevant section of the Bash man page. There might be a better way, but here's what I've got currently:  man () {   case "$(type -t "$1")" in     builtin)       local pattern="^ *$1"        if bashdoc_match "$pattern \+[-[]"; then         command man bash | less --pattern="$pattern +[-[]"       elif bashdoc_match "$pattern\b"; then         command man bash | less --pattern="$pattern[[:&gt;:]]"       else         command man bash       fi       ;;     keyword)       command man bash | less --hilite-search --pattern='^SHELL GRAMMAR$'       ;;     *)       command man "$@"       ;;   esac }  bashdoc_match() {   command man bash | col -b | grep -l "$1" &gt; /dev/null } Why does Google Analytics report 100% bounce rate when the page has lots of page views? Google Analytics reports 100% bounce rate for a page which has lots of page views and an Avg Time on Page of 32 seconds. Shouldn't one of the following be true?  Either the bounce rate is less than 100% when the Avg Time on Page is greater than 0 or the Avg Time on Page is 0 when the bounce rate is 100%.  I fail to see how or why the report does not conform the above two conditions. How to include PDF pages without a newpage before the first page? How to connect to remote X-Server (logged in via ssh) When I'm logged on to another host (e.g via ssh), how do I connect to the XServer of that machine (same user is logged in and is running a desktop (gnome))?  You may ask way I wish to do that: There are commands that don't open an X-Window, e.g. xinput, xhost, etc.. and there are situations where you want to run them from remote. How can I script the settings made by gnome-tweak-tool? I like to be able to configure things from the command line, so that when I reinstall the OS I can just run a script and get my preferred configuration back.  Since "upgrading" to Ubuntu 17.10, I found I had to use gnome-tweak-tool to get some settings the way I want them.  Once I find a setting in the gnome-tweak-tool GUI, how can I figure out its scriptable translation?  For example the following gsettings lines match the relevant entries in the gnome-tweak-tool screen shot below...  gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences titlebar-font "Tahoma Bold 8" gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface font-name "Tahoma 8" gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface document-font-name "Tahoma 8" gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface monospace-font-name "FixedSC 10"    ...but how could anyone guess that? And how would I, for example, figure out where to get the corresponding settings for hinting and antialiasing? Trouble With Persistence After Making a USB Live Thumb Drive Using Pendrivelinux I created a bootable Ubuntu on my 32GB thumb drive (on a NTFS partition) and I selected a persistence of 4GB.  I've noticed that when I reboot from the initial booting off of the USB thumb drive, nothing is preserved.  No apps that were installed nor saved bookmarks.  Is there a way for me to manually force persistence? Group files in some folders I have some files with different extensions such as *.pdf, *.mp3, *.jpg and a few others. All of them are stored in a parent directory.  How can I get a list of all extensions, create some folders based on these  extensions and then move all files into their relevant folders? This is from problem $8$, Chapter II of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis.  The problem asks for a Borel set $M$ on $R$, such that for any interval $I$, $M \cap I$ has measure greater than $0$ and less than $m(I)$.  I was thinking of taking the Cantor approach: taking $R$ to be the union of $[a,b]$ with $a$ and $b$ rationals, and for each $[a,b]$ we construct Cantor sets inside it. During theconstruction of each Cantor set, in order to have positive measure on it, we need to take off smaller and smaller intervals from it, namely the proportion goes to $0$. As a result, these Cantor sets are extremely "dense" on their ends. If for an interval $I$ it intersects with the Cantor set on $[a,b]$ while $b-a&gt;&gt;m(I)$, we shall expect the measure of intersection to be rather close to $m(I)$ and then we lose control on these cases.  Is there any way to fix this or shall I consider other approaches?  Thank you why don't we define vector multiplication component-wise? I was just wondering why we don't ever define multiplication of vectors as individual component multiplication.  That is, why doesn't anybody ever define $\langle a_1,b_1 \rangle \cdot \langle a_2,b_2 \rangle$ to be $\langle a_1a_2, b_1b_2 \rangle$?  Is the resulting vector just not geometrically interesting? Why isn’t singular ‘they’ used with 3Sg verb forms? There are many (duplicate) questions about the acceptance, popularity and history of singular they (and their, them and themself) around here, it even got a tag of its own. If I didn’t miss anything, however, the proper verb form hasn’t been questioned yet.  As we all know, English third person singular pronouns (it, she, he and one, +body), names (Alice, Bob, …) and nouns (student, teacher, …) demand the +(e)s suffix be added to the finite verb form in simple present, where some auxiliary verbs have a “special” form (is &lt; *bes / *ares and has &lt; *haves). All other subjects don’t, including plural third person pronoun they.  When the plural you replaced thou (with thee, thy / thine), the other marked verb form that had remained in English – i.e. suffix +(e)st or +t – vanished, too. The first and second persons only ever appear as pronouns (I, we; you), not names or nouns, so there was no strong inclination to keep the verbal inflection.  The second person precedent would suggest that singular they be used with uninflected verb forms which is how it’s usually encountered in the wild. Assuming that they someday replaces he and she (and maybe it) it would lead to disagreement with the words the pronoun stands in for:        Alice         goes to her   place  by herself.   Bob           goes to his   place  by himself.   Alice and Bob go   to their place  by themselves. – (common)   Alice and Bob go   to their places by themselves. – (separate)                  She  goes to her   place  by herself.   He   goes to his   place  by himself.   They go   to their place  by themselves.   They go   to their places by themselves.                  They ?goes to their place  by themself.   ditto   They  go   to their place  by themselves.   They  go   to their places by themselves.                  They ?go to their place  by ?themselves.   ditto   They  go to their place  by  themselves.   They  go to their places by  themselves.      So why doesn’t singular they afford s on present-tense verbs like all other third person singular subjects do?   I learned about singular they only long after I had been taught English as a second language in school. That’s why it’s still a conscious decision to use it and hence I could easily adapt to use s forms with it, but would that sound and look funny / strange / wrong to native speakers? Do you get to use the additional attack from the Extra Attack feature as well when you Ready an Attack action?  One of my players, a monk, decided to Ready an action as an earth elemental was about to attack. The trigger was the elemental moving within five feet of him. When this occurred, he took his Attack action, and then proceeded to take the extra attack as well.  I was unsure at the time whether or not the extra attack would also happen, and I haven't had much luck figuring it out. Vertical text (not in table) jQuery: live() vs delegate() How old is Chewbacca, anyway? Do Wookiees get gray fur when they are old?