I got one error I just can't find the problem, can someone help me or explain whats wrong? Still tried to comment out the problem or search just can't find any clues it just goes with this error:   1&gt;Compiling... 1&gt;option.cpp 1&gt;Linking... 1&gt;fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20060201' and 'P2' version '20050411' 1&gt;LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed 1&gt;Build log was saved at "file://c:\Users\modestas\Desktop\ybtx\code\game\gas\GameGas\Release\BuildLog.htm" 1&gt;GameGas - 1 error(s), 0 warning(s) ========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 12 up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========   There is no code because can't understand where this occur happened.
I compile my project with VIsual Studio 2005 Express Edition, and get this linking error. Can anyone suggest how to solve that?
Does an electrolytic capacitor degrade each time it receives reverse voltage? What does the notation $S^n$ mean? I see this notation a lot, but I can't seem to find an answer in my google searches. In particular I am looking at the question      Let $\alpha:S^n\rightarrow S^n$ be the antipodal map. Prove that $n$ is odd, then $\alpha\simeq \operatorname{id}.$    If it is an arbitrary symmetric group, then I understand, but I have seen $S^1$ be used for the circle. Why do we use ./filename to execute a file in linux?  Why not just enter it like other commands gcc, ls etc... Find the sum of $\sum \limits_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2^{-n}(n+3)}{(n+1)(n+2)}$ Can trusted users be trusted to suggest tag synonyms without a score of 5 in a tag? (on smaller sites, not Stack Overflow) This has been asked before but I feel the original question was more focussed on Stack Overflow than the Stack Exchange network at large.   Related:   Since there are now a lot of sites in the network and many of them use the tag system for categorising questions based on the title of something (for example, Arqade (Gaming), Movies &amp; TV, Sci Fi &amp; Fantasy, etc) I feel that the required knowledge of the subject matter the tag is representing is less of an issue than it perhaps is on other Stack Exchange sites.   In the below screenshot, for example, I shouldn't really have needed a score of 5 in either of the tags to perform what is essentially a cleanup process. I could of course edit all of the posts to delete one tag, so why can't I suggest it as a synonym?    This could be implemented as a per site setting so that it can only be enabled on certain sites if need be.   Can trusted users be trusted to suggest tag synonyms without a score of 5 in a tag? shorter proof of generalized mediant inequality? How do I restore /usr/bin/env after overwriting it with start-tor-browser file I was installing Tor and wanted to access it directly from the terminal, so I was trying to copy start-tor-browser to /usr/bin. But by mistake, I have replaced the /usr/bin/env file with the start-tor-browser file. What should I do now?? Conky does not work properly on Ubuntu 16.04 GNOME I have this strange problem with conky. It doesn't show properly on the desktop:    I've tried everything from editing conky widget file to reinstalling conky and conky manager (v.2.4). Who knows how to fix it? What is the "continue" keyword and how does it work in Java? I saw this keyword for the first time and I was wondering if someone could explain to me what it does.   What is the continue keyword? How does it work? When is it used? Merge two rows in SQL 403 error after upgrading to apache2.4 How to Solve this Arithmetic Progression Question? Please help-  Four different integers form an increasing AP.One of these numbers is equal to the sum of the squares of the other three numbers.Then- find all the four numbers.  I assumed the numbers to be $a,a+d,a+2d,a+3d$ and wlog let $a+3d$ this number and according to question-  $a^2+(a+d)^2+(a+2d)^2=a+3d$  but I could not solve the above equation. Let $(x_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of real numbers. A well known result is:     The sequence $(x_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to $a\in \mathbb{R}$ if and only if every subsequence $(x_{n_k})_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to $a\in \mathbb{R}$.   Now, I'm working on an exercise which essentialy asks to prove the following:     The sequence $(x_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to $a\in \mathbb{R}$ if and only if for every subsequence $(x_{n_k})_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ there is a (sub)subsequence $(x_{n_{k_j}})_{j\in \mathbb{N}}$ which converges to $a$.   Now, one direction is trivial. If in fact $(x_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to $a$, then by the result I've mentioned, every subsequence of $(x_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to $a$. Let then $(x_{n_k})_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ be an arbitrary subsequence. In that case, we know that it is a subsequence of itself, and hence we've found a (sub)subsequence which converges to $a$.  The other way around seems quite complicated for me. The reason is as follows: I must assume that every subsequence $(x_{n_k})_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ has a (sub)subsequence which converges to $a$ and the proof that the original one converges to $a$.  My problem is exactly that "a". If it had all (sub)subsequences converging to $a$, then by the result i've mentionted, the subsequence $(x_{n_k})_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ would converge to $a$. In that case, we would have every subsequence converging to $a$ and the result would follow.  My idea to prove the claim was then:  First remember that a subsequence is the restriction of the original one $x: \mathbb{N}\to \mathbb{R}$ to an infinite subset $\mathbb{N}'\subset \mathbb{N}$. In that case a (sub)subsequence is the restriction of $\tilde{x} = x|\mathbb{N}'$ to an infinite subset $\mathbb{N}''\subset \mathbb{N}$. But since $\tilde{x}$ is the restriction of $x$ to $\mathbb{N}'$ and since $\mathbb{N}''\subset \mathbb{N}'$, the restriction of $\tilde{x}$ to $\mathbb{N}''$ is itself the restriction of $x$ to $\mathbb{N}''$.  In other words, every (sub)subsequence can be viewed as a subsequence of the original one. Considering this, by hypothesis every subsequence has a (sub)subsequence which converges to $a$. But by this argument, this means that we can replace every subsequence with a convergent one. And then we can use the result I stated.  Is my idea correct? Is this really the way to prove the claim? My only doubt is that I need every subsequence converging to $a$ to use the result. In this case I can't see how I can argue that this implies every subsequence converges to $a$.  How can I finish this proof? Function pointers, Closures, and Lambda I am just now learning about function pointers and, as I was reading the K&amp;R chapter on the subject, the first thing that hit me was, "Hey, this is kinda like a closure." I knew this assumption is fundamentally wrong somehow and after a search online I didn't find really any analysis of this comparison.  So why are C-style function pointers fundamentally different from closures or lambdas? As far as I can tell it has to do with the fact that the function pointer still points to a defined (named) function as opposed to the practice of anonymously defining the function.  Why is passing a function to a function seen as more powerful in the second case, where it is unnamed, than the first where it is just a normal, everyday function that is being passed?  Please tell me how and why I am wrong to compare the two so closely.  Thanks. Does either pill actually do anything? When Morpheus offers the pill choice to Neo, they are still in the Matrix. That leads me to belive that none of the pills are real thus having no particular effect in the real world. Was it some sort of placebo effect that freed Neo from the Matrix or do the pills have an actual effect? Force "portrait" orientation mode back commandbutton in jsf Why is diamond transparent while graphite is not? Diamond and graphite are both made of the same atom, carbon. Diamond has a tetrahedron structure while graphite has a flat hexagonal structure. Why is diamond transparent while graphite is not (at least not with more than a couple of layers)? What is the best algorithm for overriding GetHashCode? Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return? I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?).  After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again.  During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort?  Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies?