The code below throws the error Error: Unexpected call to method or property access when I create a style elemnt and attempt to append the code to it:  //This is OK var styleElement = document.createElement("style");  //This is OK styleElement.type = "text/css";  //THIS THROWS THE ERROR styleElement.appendChild(document.createTextNode("a { color: red; }"));   What am I doing wrong?
I'm looking for a way to insert a &lt;style&gt; tag into an HTML page with JavaScript.  The best way I found so far:  var divNode = document.createElement("div"); divNode.innerHTML = "&lt;br&gt;&lt;style&gt;h1 { background: red; }&lt;/style&gt;"; document.body.appendChild(divNode);   This works in Firefox, Opera and Internet Explorer but not in Google Chrome. Also it's a bit ugly with the &lt;br&gt; in front for IE.  Does anyone know of a way to create a &lt;style&gt; tag that   Is nicer Works with Chrome?   Or maybe   This is a non-standard thing I should avoid Three working browsers are great and who uses Chrome anyway?
Anything I should keep in mind before I start mixing and matching between D&D 3.5e and Pathfinder? Anything I should keep in mind before I start mixing and matching between D&amp;D 3.5e and Pathfinder?  Off the top of my head, the biggest difference is feats every 2/3 levels. Would it affect balance if I picked every 3 levels instead of 2? I think PF options are still pretty solid regardless... If you go to review a suggested edit and close the Reject dialogue box, the button at the top-right will continue to say "Rejecting...". You will not be able to continue with the review process.  I have refreshed the page, and tried clearing my cache. If I refresh the page, I can continue reviewing the edit.  I'm using Chrome Version 31.0.1650.57 m. Bold italic vectors I am trying to display vectors as bold and italic. The command \mathbf sets the letters non-italic. I also googled a bit and stumbled upon \mathbf{\em y} or \mathbfit{y}, which all didn't work.  I hope someone can help me on this. was closed as "Not constructive" a little while ago by CasperOne. I'm not here to argue about the closure; in fact, I'm forced to agree that, as it stands, the question is explicitly a polling question and eligible to be closed for that reason.  I'd like to see it preserved, however; it's got a fair bit of useful in-depth information for ObjC/Cocoa developers on the "singleton" topic.* It's also (possibly more importantly) a great duplicate target -- have a look at the list of linked questions. I want to try to stave off deletion, and hopefully get it reopened.** (I did vote for reopening, but it expired.)  My thought is to edit the question itself into a "constructive" form, but after spending some time pondering how to do so, I'm not crazy about any of the ideas that I've come up with. Essentially they all involve reworking the question to fit the answers:   Rewrite the question so that the accepted answer fits exactly. "I've got this singleton implementation, but I really want the creation to happen earlier in my app's execution. How can I make that happen?" This is artificial and (in my opinion) doesn't make a particularly good question. Make the question still general, but more concrete and focused on the implementation give in the body. "What are the pitfalls associated with this singleton creation procedure? Are there other features that my singleton should have?" This is still skirting the border of discussion->NC, and none of the answers really respond to this exactly. Remove the implementation from the question and just ask for the "best" implementation. This obviously requires coming up with stringent criteria for "best", and, while it would preserve the relationship between the Q and A's best, might not even move it out of NC territory.   I'm looking for suggestions of ways to re-write this so that it can stick around. Alternatively, if you think I should just be advocating for a historical lock, say so.   If you think my basic premise is faulty and don't think the question should be preserved at all, I respectfully request that you just downvote me instead of answering -- I'd prefer not to turn this into an argument about the merits of the question, and I definitely don't want it to become a(nother) "deletionist"/"inclusionist" skirmish (and I am not infrequently ).    *Quite a bit of it unfortunately in comments.  **Historical locking would also be an acceptable solution to me, but it doesn't seem to fit the "controversial" criterion. Do I need to change my ESTA address when visiting the US? I have an ESTA for my visit last Sept to NY and I know it is valid for 2years.  I am going to Las Vegas in May, do I have to update the address at which I will be staying? Why is everything floating in space so cold? Of course there is pretty hot stuff too. For example Suns.  But isn't the vacuum of space the perfect containment for heat? And shouldn't the rare collision with particles even heat up an object that floats around in space?  Why aren't they hot from time to time? Is it because they loose their heat by radiant heat?  And if so does radiant heat emission always occur until the object is the same temperature as the surrounding or does it depend on other factors? Why $x^{p^n}-x+1$ is irreducible in ${\mathbb{F}_p}$ only when $n=1$ or $n=p=2$ I have a question, I think it concerns with field theory.     Why the polynomial $$x^{p^n}-x+1$$ is irreducible in ${\mathbb{F}_p}$ only when $n=1$ or $n=p=2$?   Thanks in advance. It bothers me for several days. This is an idea I have seen around, but I have not seen a feature request for it, so here it is.  Downvotes that have no comments are frustrating and difficult to manage.  This is a way to help improve that:   Have a downvote initially cost more to cast for the downvoter (5 points for example) When a comment (from the downvoter) on the downvoted question/answer gets an upvote, you get your points back.   All points (ie all 5) could be refunded or just up till the traditional -1 that is in place now (ie 4 points refunded).    This would encourage good comments and downvotes for real reasons.  (Because comments for questions/answers that are bias related will not get the upvotes as readily.)  This could/should be limited to non-subjective tags.  (ie tags where a downvote just because you "don't like it" is not appropriate.) How to prepare data for ListVectorPlot[]? Should form 'Continue' button be disabled if validation is incomplete? In forms we often see the 'continue' button inactive until all the required fields are complete:         &ndash; Wireframes created with   Is this actually a help to the user, or a hindrance?  I imagine the Pro for this is that it's a visual indicator to the user that they haven't finished filling in the form or dealing with errors (because even with inline validation a user won't be informed if they've never actually interacted with a field so won't show any errors for those at that point).  But then the main Con for this (which I've also seen borne out in usability testing) is that users will be confused why they can't click the button.  Is the pattern of disabling the Continue button until validation is complete actually providing a negative user experience? underbrace matrix inside brackets I would like to put an underbrace below the matrix like this:  $$\left(\underbrace{ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}     a&amp;b&amp;c\\     d&amp;e&amp;f\\     g&amp;h&amp;i \end{array}\right]}_{A} \left[\begin{array}{c}     x_1\\     x_2\\     x_3 \end{array}\right]\right)$$     But I don't want the outer brackets \left( and \right) to stretch vertically. I want them to remain as if there was no underbrace. How to achieve that behaviour? How to avoid messages from applications which I ran with a &? I ran dolphin like this:  dolphin . &amp;   I see messages in the console like these:  QPixmap::scaled: Pixmap is a null pixmap   How can I keep the console clean or silent? How should I submit bug reports and feature requests? Inspired by  I became curious about what is the current preferred mechanism for submitting bug reports and feature requests to Apple. I'm aware that they have the internal RDAR bug tracking system, and that there is an  project to crowdsource the tracking of issues, but I'm at a loss as to the preferred channel to submit something.    Is there a public-facing portal for submitting issues? I am a Chinese citizen married to a US citizen last year. I am going to apply for a UK tourist visa. The name shows on my passport is my maiden name, while any other documents the UK visa needed, such as bank statement, is with my married name. I can provide my marriage license to prove the link between my maiden name and married mane.   Can I apply for this UK visa with my situation? Opening the menu and selecting an item from the "Favorite Sites" menu allows us to see a feed for a specific site. In the top right corner of this page is a drop-down which allows us to select the "sort order" for the posts. The default is "Active" with other options like "Newest", "Hot", etc.  The problem is that when I select "Newest" or any other option. This preference is not remembered when I change between a different "Favorite Site".  So I am requesting that the selection is persisted when changing between site feeds. I have no preference whether this is implemented per site (to allow a different default for each site) or just one single preferred default that works on all sites (last option selected). I just want it to remember that I have selected "Newest" when I am flicking though the sites. Is there a way I can share the 3.42 GB download of Windows 8.1 from Windows Store? What is the difference between #include  and #include "filename"? I understand that the Istari - the only other Maiar besides the Balrog to come into close proximity to the Ring - are constrained within a mortal body and subject to its mortal weaknesses, which renders them vulnerable to the Ring's domination and corruption. However, what is to stop Gandalf from returning to his true form, picking up the Ring, and just walking all the way to Mount Doom? Sauron is too weak at the time; he would have been able to do nothing but watch helplessly and pray his mortal armies can defeat a Ring-bearing Gandalf.  Is Gandalf's decision to abide by the Valar's will to the end the only thing holding him back from this particular option? Are there enchantments in place to disable his ability to revert to Maia form, such that the option was never there to begin with? Or would he, even in Maia form and free of mortal weaknesses, still be vulnerable to domination and corruption by the Ring?  The One Ring is forged with the essence of Sauron to dominate and rule the minds of lesser beings. However, Sauron is only a Maia - albeit the highest-ranking in Morgoth's following. Fellow Maiar would be his equal (at least in rank), while the Valar are certainly superior in power to him. If an Ainu becomes a Ringbearer, will he/she eventually fall to Sauron's will too, or at least succumb to the corruption of the Ring's dark power? Can helium disappear from Earth? I followed the instructions and got success response but I didn't receive email.  Then I used the id to get Email Status and got 404 error.  Here is my json :  POST :   {     "To": {         "Address": "example@gmail.com",         "SubscriberKey": "example@gmail.com.tw"     },     "Options": {         "RequestType": "ASYNC"     } }   GET : {id}  Please let me know how I can resolve the issue.