Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, 64 bit, kernel 3.2.0-58  I used to be able to report a bug to Ubuntu by simply double clicking on the .crash files in directory /var/crash. Last week I changed internet service providers. Since then, when I double click a .crash file, the upload proceeds until the progress bar is almost to the right edge, the network traffic shows the size of the .crash file has been uploaded, and then a dialog appears with title "Network problem" and message:  "Cannot connect to crash database, please check your Internet connection.   HTTP Error 502: Bad Gateway"  I am using my new internet service provider for all other purposes without problem. From what I have read, this particular error indicates a problem that is not in my control.   I would like to continue to report bugs to Ubuntu. Is there a way to do so with out using apport so as to circumvent the 502 network error? For example, can I copy the .crash file to DropBox, and submit it to Ubuntu?
As of today I only knew about ubuntu-bug which I could use to report bugs about a specific program. But now I learned about apport-collect and apport-bug which basically are:  apport-bug - Reports problems to launchpad using Apport to collect a lot of information about your system to help the developers fix the problem and avoid unnecessary questions and answers.  apport-collect - Works as apport-bug but it send the information to an already existing bug report. In my case it was apport-collect 1060268 Thanks to Brad Figg in Launchpad.  Are there any other tools to report bugs?
Piping data through arbitrary functions in Clojure In the recently launched trailer of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, there are people Apparating inside Hogwarts grounds.                                  As these people later question Professor Dumbledore, it seemed they were Ministry officials.  Have we ever encountered such Apparition before? Or, was this anti-Apparation charm put into place in recent times? What is the best way to implement constants in Java? I've seen examples like this:   public class MaxSeconds {    public static final int MAX_SECONDS = 25; }   and supposed that I could have a Constants class to wrap constants in, declaring them static final. I know practically no Java at all and am wondering if this is the best way to create constants. An example of a sequence of Riemann integrable functions $(f_n)$ that converges pointwise to a function $f$ that is not Riemann integrable. I have been given the example $$ f_n(x)= \begin{cases} 1, &amp; \text{if}\; x\in\{(x_k)_{k=1}^{n}\}, \\ 0, &amp; \text{otherwise.} \end{cases} $$ Here the sequence $(x_k)_{k=1}^{\infty}$ is the sequence that "enumerates" elements of $\mathbb{Q}$. The sequence of functions converges pointwise to $$ f(x)= \begin{cases} 1, &amp; x\in\mathbb{Q}, \\ 0, &amp; x\notin\mathbb{Q}, \end{cases} $$ which isn't Riemann integrable. However, I am not quite convinced that $f_n$ is integrable. I would like some help in seeing how $f_n$ is Riemann integrable. Also, I would like more examples of sequences of Riemann integrable functions $f_n$  that converge pointwise to a function $f$ that is not Riemann integrable. Sqrt disappeared when exporting plot to PDF in version 10 Is the energy density of vacuum uniform in the whole universe? How is it the Voyagers are a few seconds closer to Earth than earlier? The  of March 01, 2013 put it's distance at 14 hrs 04 mins 23 secs of light-travel time from Earth. A  (earlier today) tweet says it is 14 hrs 04 mins 22 secs of light-travel time from Earth. An  tweet put it still further out at 14 hrs 04 mins 25 secs of light-travel time.  The Voyager 2 tweets on Voyager 1's proximity to Earth too has reduced similarly to  earlier today from  reported on Feb 28 2013  It could quite simply be a typo ... If not a typo then my curiosity is piqued; I was under the impression the Voyagers are outbound from the Solar System now without any major in-system activities now.   How is it the Voyagers are closer to Earth than before? Why is everybody so concerned about etc/passwd? Preserve search engine rankings while shifting to new domain name When do I have to use 'will' instead of 'going to'? Does going to only express an intention and will some kind of prediction that doesn't necessarily happen?  EDIT: Thanks for all your answers. I asked this question because I always fail to complete exercises like this from an ESL book:   We  will fly to Venice in June. (Correct: But, how can I be sure that I'm not sick in June?) Philipp will be 15 next Wednesday (Correct: Since his birthday is a fixed day, this will happen). They will get a new computer. (Wrong: Why?, If I need a new computer, I simply get a new one) In 2020 people are going to buy more hybrid cars.  (Wrong, Why? Who can tell for sure). Is there a criterion to differentiate "thriller" from "horror"? The genres, in my opinion, have a very slim boundary separating one from another. I see a lot of movies being categorized as thriller or horror almost interchangeably, which might seem like lack of thought or criteria. However, is there a true criterion used to differentiate between the two film genres? How can I install Whatsapp web app on Ubuntu? I found a similar question , but here I am asking for the WhatsApp desktop webapp so that I can directly access the application without opening a browser. Possible Duplicate:          In a question, I see that each time I refresh the page, the answers were placed in a different order. The question has 3 answers each with zero votes. The users' reputation was something like 6, 1200, and 7300 but these numbers didn't affect the order.  What is the criteria of the sort order of the answers? Why do the less than symbol () appear wrong as upside down exclamation (¡) or question mark (¿)? Find the value of $\sum_0^n \binom{n}{k} (-1)^k \frac{1}{k+1}$ Find the value of $\sum_0^n \binom{n}{k} (-1)^k \frac{1}{k+1}$.  Writing out several terms, I think the answer is $1/(n+1)$, but I'm struggling to prove this. I would greatly appreciate it if someone could show how to prove this. In thinking how to ask this question (somewhat) succinctly, I keep coming back to a Microwave Oven.  A Microwave Oven has a grid of holes over the window specifically designed to be smaller in diameter than the wavelength of the microwaves it produces, yet larger than the wavelengths of the visible light spectrum - this is so you can watch your food being heated without getting an eye full of microwaves.  The "realness" of electromagnetic waves seems indisputable - both from the microwave example above, and also because if I want to broadcast a radio wave with a certain wavelength, then I need to make sure I have an antenna of corresponding length to produce the wave I'm looking for.  Furthermore, we discuss and treat these waves as real, measurable "objects" that exist and can be manipulated.     Now, if I want to describe the behavior of my Microwave Oven in the framework of QM (let's pretend my oven is going to only produce 1 photon of energy corresponding to a wavelength of the microwave spectrum for simplicity) then I'll describe the behavior of that photon as a wavefunction that evolves over time and gives a probability distribution within my microwave that similarly does not allow the photon to pass through the safety grid and exit the oven cavity giving me a retinal burn.  The difference is, the wavefunction is never treated as something "real" in this description.  When the safety grid is described as working to protect you because it has holes smaller than the wavelength of the classical waves it's blocking, this is a useful description that seems to describe "real" objects/be-ables.  While it is possible to describe why an individual photon has low probability of passing through the same grid but extended physical properties such as wavelength (in space) are treated as non-real because we're dealing with a point particle and with behavior described by something we also treat as non-real (the wavefunction); it seems unclear to me why we insist this wave function which predicts behavior of physical measurements so well is somehow "non-real."    Put another way, if we have no problem treating EM waves as "Real," then why do we insist on treating the wavefunction that describes the same behavior as "unreal?"  I understand there is recent research (Eric Cavalcanti and his group for one) trying to argue this point, but as every respectable physics professor, I've ever encountered, has treated the wavefunction as an indisputably non-real mathematical tool, I needed to ask this community for an answer. Is there a noun for something that is "out of place" in space, like an anachronism is "out of place" in time? E.g., an old-timey barber shop in a chic neighborhood. Display the original, unedited post on the post editing page I edit people's posts occasionally on ServerFault when the grammar/punctuation/coherence goes below a threshold that my OCD can handle. However, on some of the thornier posts I would like to be able to compare my edits to the original text, especially when doing a final proof-reading of my edits.  At the moment, my only options are to either copy the original text into a text editor or copy a duplicate of the text into the editing field. From there I can compare my edits to the original text and make sure I'm preserving the original meaning as I attempt to untangle less than optimal communication.  This request is somewhat similar to this Meta post: "" How can I use the MS JDBC driver with MS SQL Server 2008 Express? My configuration:     windows XP SP3 JDBC 2005 MS SQL Server 2008 Express, exposed via tcp/ip on port 1433 sqljdbc.jar in class path    I tried:  try {     Class.forName("com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver").newInstance();     con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:microsoft:sqlserver://localhost:1433/SQLEXPRESS2008;databaseName=Test;selectMethod=cursor", "sa", ""); } catch (Exception e) {     e.printStackTrace(); }   But it always throws an exception:  java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver   I also tried the following urls:  localhost:1433/SQLEXPRESS2008  localhost/SQLEXPRESS2008  localhost   Same results.  Any help? Maybe this is an easy question, maybe not.  I have a select box where I hardcode with width. Say 120px.    &lt;select style="width: 120px"&gt;   &lt;option&gt;REALLY LONG TEXT, REALLY LONG TEXT, REALLY LONG TEXT&lt;/option&gt;   &lt;option&gt;ABC&lt;/option&gt; &lt;/select&gt;     I want to be able to show the second option so that the user can see the full length of the text.  Like everything else.  This works fine in Firefox, but doesn't work with Internet Explorer6.