"Listening Music" I was just curious that is it okay to say/write "Listening Music" if we are not writing the whole sentence.   For example, if I have to write "Listening Music" under my Hobbies sections somewhere. Should I write "Listening to Music" or, "Listening music" will do?
Why Listen to Music, why not Listening Music Maximum time I face this problem by saying listening music. Is there any traditional cause behind this?  Can we use listen music or listening music?  Seems there is only a slight difference, but why is listen to music the right way to say it?
When would you call java's thread.run() instead of thread.start()? When would you call Java's thread.run() instead of thread.start()? When or why would you use a right outer join instead of left? states:  "In practice, explicit right outer joins are rarely used, since they can always be replaced with left outer joins and provide no additional functionality."  Can anyone provide a situation where they have preferred to use the RIGHT notation, and why? I can't think of a reason to ever use it. To me, it wouldn't ever make things more clear.  Edit: I'm an Oracle veteran making the New Year's Resolution to wean myself from the (+) syntax. I want to do it right Using PTSerif-TLF for Cyrillic with TeX Gyre Pagella What is the function of the "Sticky edges" on/off setting in displays? I have installed Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise Pangolin). If I open System Settings &gt;&gt; Displays there is a new (?) on/off button for a setting named Sticky edges.  Can someone tell me what this setting is supposed to control? Similarity of real matrices over $\mathbb{C}$ $A  \underset{\mathbb{C}}{\sim} B \overset{\text{def}}{\iff} A=C^{-1}BC, \space C\in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ and similarly for $\underset{\mathbb{R}}{\sim}$.     I want to prove that $ A \underset{\mathbb{C}}{\sim} B$ for $A,B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{R})$ therefore $A \underset{\mathbb{R}}{\sim} B$.   My idea is that elementary divisors of $A,B$ over $\mathbb{C}$ are the same, and if $(x-z)^k$ is elementary divisor than $(x-\overline{z})^k$ is also elementary divisor $\implies$ $A,B$ have same elementary divisors over $\mathbb{R}$. But i think it's not clear. What does $$ mean in the shell? Any smart ideas on finding the area of this shaded region? Kill some processes by .exe file name Smart Phone's camera socket I just want ask how the socket in the image is called?   I couldn't really find and the closer I could get is only Raspberry's module. Logical XOR operator in C++? Referencing to "above" or "below"? $\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(u +n)^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{(\sin \pi u)^2}$ I've already see a  by Marko Riedel which I list it follows:     The standard way to treat these sums is to integrate   $$ f(z) = \frac{1}{(z+\alpha)^2} \pi \cot(\pi z)$$   along a contour consisting of a circle of radius $R$ and with $R$ going to infinity and hence being larger than $\alpha$, where the circle does not pass through the poles on the real axis.   Now along the semicircle in the upper half plane we have   $$|f(z)| \le \frac{1}{(R-|\alpha|)^2}\pi \left|\frac{e^{i\pi R\exp(i\theta)} + e^{-i\pi R\exp(i\theta)}} {e^{i\pi R\exp(i\theta)} - e^{-i\pi R\exp(i\theta)}}\right|= \frac{1}{(R-|\alpha|)^2} \pi  \left|\frac{e^{2i\pi R\exp(i\theta)}+1}{e^{2i\pi R\exp(i\theta)}-1}\right| &lt; \frac{1}{(R-|\alpha|)^2} \pi   \frac{1+e^{-2\pi R\sin(\theta)}e^{2i\pi R\cos(\theta)}} {1-e^{-2\pi R\sin(\theta)}e^{2i\pi R\cos(\theta)}}$$   This last term is clearly $O(1/R^2)$ as $R$ goes to infinity as the quotient of the two exponentials goes to one since $\exp(-R)$ vanishes and there is no singularity when $\theta = 0$ or $\theta = \pi$ as $R\cos\theta = \pm R$, which is not an integer by the assumption that the circle avoids the poles and hence cannot be one.     My question: It is clear that for each $z=Re^{i \theta}$ , $f(z)=O(1/R^2)$ ，but can this guarantee that the last term on RHS is uniform bounded ? Since $\theta$ varies on a compact interval $[0, \pi]$ , I want to show that for each $ \theta \in [0, \pi]$ , and a fixed positive number $M \gt 1 $ there exist an open ball contains $\theta$ and a fixed $R_{\theta}\gt 0$ , for every $R \ge R_{\theta}$ and $x \in $ the open ball $$\frac{1+e^{-2\pi R\sin(x)}e^{2i\pi R\cos(x)}} {1-e^{-2\pi R\sin(x)}e^{2i\pi R\cos(x)}} \le M$$  For $\theta \neq 0,\pi$ , it is easy to find the desired $R_{\theta}$ and the open ball , but if $\theta = 0$ or $ \theta = \pi$ , for every open ball containing $\theta$ , it behave erratically near $\theta$ , I have no idea how to deal with this . In particular, I am referring to the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. Correct plural form of a noun preceded by "zero" When using zero as a quantifier, is it correct to use the singular form on the object of the quantifier, or the plural form?  It sounds confusing when I put it that way, but what I mean is: Which is correct?   Your password expires in 0 days. Your password expires in 0 day.   Essentially I suppose I'm asking, does "singular" mean "one" or "the opposite of more than one", as zero is not "plural" in the traditional "more than one" sense?  I'm pretty sure "days" sounds correct, but I can't be sure. I'm trying to delete some old flow which are inactive via workbench. DestructiveChanges.xml &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt; &lt;Package xmlns=&quot;http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata&quot;&gt;     &lt;types&gt;         &lt;members&gt;Advanced_Round_Robin&lt;/members&gt;         &lt;name&gt;Flow&lt;/name&gt;     &lt;/types&gt;Ï &lt;/Package&gt;  package.xml &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt; &lt;Package xmlns=&quot;http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata&quot;&gt;       &lt;version&gt;48.0&lt;/version&gt; &lt;/Package&gt;  I've added both file in zip and in workbench when I deploy using this zip file I get below error.  insufficient access rights on cross-reference id   What permission I need to have to perform this action? Also is there way I can delete few version of same flow only? Like keep only last 3-4 version and delete all previous version of given flow? Thank you. Calculation of number density from material density Material density is given by $ \rho =m/V$, where $m$ is mass and $V$ is volume. Again number density given by $n=N/V$, where $N$ is the total number of particle. How can I calculate number density $n$ from material density $ \rho $. Original file claudio antonio claudio michele  I  want to change only the first occurrence of &quot;claudio&quot; with &quot;claudia&quot; so that I would get the following: claudia antonio claudio michele  I have tried the following: sed -e '1,/claudio/s/claudio/claudia/' nomi  The above command performs global substitution (it replaces all occurrences of 'claudio') . Why? Why does Stack Overflow only allow one @User per comment?  This restriction lead me to a non-comment like :     @MiMo - seem my previous comment (Only one @ user per comment)   Which left me wondering why Stack Overflow is blocking me from notifying two users of a response.  I am sure there is a reason for this, can some one share it with me? Can a finite group act freely (as homeomorphisms) on $\mathbb R^n$ I am asking if whether or not a finite group acts freely (as homeomorphisms) on $\mathbb R^n$.  To answer in the negative, it suffices to show: for any homeomorphism $f$ such that $f^d=\text{id}_{\mathbb R^n}$, then $f$ has a fixed point.  I am looking for a complete self-contained answer. I need to save/compile a few times and a bunch of weird files (like foo.tex.Ak6664) appear in my Dropbox folder each time I need to compile between two and four times before I see changes I make in the editor (TeXstudio) and each time I compile, a new .tex file is created with random letters and numbers at the end.   For example, If I create the file hello.tex and compile two to four times I'll get the file,   hello.tex.QU6664      then I make some small changes in the editor and compile two to four times I'll get the additional file,   hello.tex.Ak6664   After continuing to do this (each time compiling between two to four times before I see the changes I made), I now have many files that look like  hello.tex.QU6664, hello.tex.Ak6664, hello.tex.YX6664, hello.tex.sN6664, hello.tex.Ss6664, ...   A little bit of additional information (in case it's relevant): Everything was working fine up until a few days ago, i.e. only needed to compile once and only the file hello.tex was created. I still only get one .aux,  .synctex and .pdf files. I use TeXstudio to write and compile. I don't think it has anything to do with the bibliography (I tried removing bibliography altogether and still having the same problem).  How do I prevent these additional files from appearing and only compiling once like I used to? Has anyone had a similar problem?