How can I make a word in a code sample bold? I only see asterisks around the expected bold text.  sample **sample** sample
Frequently when I ask a question I have to include quite a bit of code for reference purposes.    It would be nice to be able to bold the important lines in the code.  For example this code:  &lt;DataTrigger Value="True"&gt;     &lt;DataTrigger.Binding&gt;         &lt;MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource DisableWorkItemConverter}"&gt;             &lt;Binding ElementName="MainForm" Path="PickedWorkItemID"/&gt;             &lt;Binding Path="Id"/&gt;         &lt;/MultiBinding&gt;     &lt;/DataTrigger.Binding&gt;     &lt;Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="False"/&gt;     &lt;Setter Property="IsSelected" Value="False"/&gt; &lt;/DataTrigger&gt;   Is not way long, but the important part (as seen in ) is the second to last line.  However, if I try to bold it, it ends up looking like this:  &lt;DataTrigger Value="True"&gt;     &lt;DataTrigger.Binding&gt;         &lt;MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource DisableWorkItemConverter}"&gt;             &lt;Binding ElementName="MainForm" Path="PickedWorkItemID"/&gt;             &lt;Binding Path="Id"/&gt;         &lt;/MultiBinding&gt;     &lt;/DataTrigger.Binding&gt;     &lt;Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="False"/&gt;     **&lt;Setter Property="IsSelected" Value="False"/&gt;** &lt;/DataTrigger&gt;   Not what I was going for.  It would be nice to be able to draw attention to specific lines of code when needed.    (One suggestion of a different color background sounds nice too (ie a yellow background to draw the eye to the relevant code.)  If there is some other way to bold in code please let me know.
An ideal whose radical is maximal is primary I've got to prove that an ideal $Q$ whose radical is a maximal ideal is a primary ideal. That is, I want to prove that if $xy\in Q$, then $x\in Q$ or $y^n\in Q$ for some $n&gt;0$.    I've been trying for a while and I'm not sure where to begin. All I've got is that if $\text{Rad}(Q)$ is maximal and by definition it's the intersection of all prime ideals $P_i$ containing $Q$, then it must be equal to each of these $P_i$. So there is only 1 prime ideal containing $Q$, namely $\text{Rad}(Q)$.  Could anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks for any replies. Opt out of moderator election notifications Windows update giving error 80070002 and manual update not working how to update? I have been trying to update my pc from 20h1 to 20h2 but the windows update shows error message 80007002 and when I manually install the update using windows 10 update assistant it downloads completely and then even starts install and gets stuck at 87 percent on the screen where it says do not turn off. What to do? This is the log file. Matching Profile found: FindRollbackFailure - 3A43C9B5-05B3-4F7C-A955-88F991BB5A48 SetupDiag version: 1.6.0.0 System Information:     Machine Name =      Manufacturer =      Model =      HostOSArchitecture = 1033     FirmwareType = UEFI     BiosReleaseDate = 20160513000000.000000+000     BiosVendor = A12     BiosVersion = A12     HostOSVersion = 10.0.19041     HostOSBuildString = 19041.1.amd64fre.vb_release.191206-1406     TargetOSBuildString = 10.0.19041.621 (vb_release_svc_prod1.201014-1758)     HostOSLanguageId =      HostOSEdition = CoreSingleLanguage     RegisteredAV = Quick Heal Internet Security     FilterDrivers = FileInfo     UpgradeStartTime = 12/20/2020 2:54:38 PM     UpgradeEndTime = 12/20/2020 5:30:40 PM     UpgradeElapsedTime = 02:36:02     CV = Pi3IdU3SlEqpFx93     ReportId =    Error: SetupDiag reports rollback failure found. Last Phase = Pre OOBE Boot Last Operation = OOBE boot apply Error = 0xC1900101-0x4000D LogEntry:   Refer to &quot;https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/Debug/system-error-codes&quot; for error information.  Last Setup Phase: Phase Name: Pre OOBE Boot     Phase Started: 12/20/2020 4:37:50 PM     Phase Ended: 1/1/0001 12:00:00 AM     Phase Time Delta: 00:00:00     Completed Successfully? False   Last Setup Operation: Operation Name: OOBE boot apply     Operation Started: 12/20/2020 4:37:50 PM     Operation Ended: 1/1/0001 12:00:00 AM     Operation Time Delta: 0:00:00:00.0000000     Completed Successfully? False If $\mathfrak p \subset R$ is a prime ideal, prove that for every nilpotent $r \in R$ it follows that $r \in \mathfrak p$.   The only hint that my tutor gave me was to use induction. Can someone explain what he means by this?  Thanks for the help! Discrepency in unanswered questions counts On , I notice that if I use the lower &quot;unanswered&quot; tab (the one in line with &quot;All Questions&quot;), the count is 1,432 questions. If I use the upper &quot;Unanswered&quot; tab (in line with the site title), I get 1,383 &quot;questions with no upvoted or accepted answers&quot;.  This changes the options in the lower tab, one of which is &quot;no answers&quot;.  Clicking here, I now get 1,083 &quot;questions with no answers&quot;. If I run select Id from Posts where PostTypeId=1 and AnswerCount=0;  in the , I get 1158 rows back. Which of these is correct, and why is the first one (1,432) so much higher than the others?  I understand that the numbers may only be updated periodically, but that difference in particular seems much too great for this to be the reason. To clarify:  1,432 is the number of &quot;unanswered questions&quot;. 1,383 is the number of &quot;questions with no upvoted or accepted answers&quot;. 1,083 is the number of &quot;questions with no answer&quot; 1,158 is the number of questions with no answer in the data explorer.  This is not live data, but that means it should be smaller, not larger, than 1,083.  I promise we did not offset this with answers to the tune of 80 questions this week.  The first three are obviously live because they fluctuate. The difference between the first two is ~50, implying they actually don't refer to the same thing, and the difference between the last two seems too great (and in the wrong direction) to be explained by the a live vs. data explorer source. How does a magnet work? How do I find my follower if and when they leave me? Finding the Mobius Transformation that maps open unit disk onto itself Hi I am trying to find all the Mobius transformations that map unit open disk onto itself i.e., if $|z|&lt;1$ then $|f(z)|&lt;1$ where $f(z)=\frac{az+b}{cz+d}$. I did so far \begin{align*} &amp;\Big|\frac{az+b}{cz+d}\Big|&lt;1\\ \Rightarrow &amp; |az+b|&lt;|cz+d|\\ \Rightarrow &amp; |az+b|^2&lt;|cz+d|^2\\ \Rightarrow &amp; |az+b||\bar{a}\bar{z}+\bar{b}|&lt;|cz+d||\bar{c}\bar{z}+\bar{d}|\\ \Rightarrow &amp; |a|^2|z|^2+|b|^2+2\text{Re }(az\bar{b})&lt;|c|^2|z|^2+|d|^2+2\text{Re }(cz\bar{d}) \end{align*}   After that I am stuck. Can anyone help me. I would be obliged...Thanks in advance. Why do I always hear remote train horn at night? This is definitely not an illusion, as many people have the same experience. I have usually lived in places miles away from train stations, which makes it unlikely to hear any train horns during the day. However at night, occasionally train horns can be heard. I hope if any one can explain the physics of this effect, like possibly sound travels faster at low temperature. I wish to travel to the US and think I am eligible to do so under the Visa Waiver Program. I found a lot of information out there but am still having some trouble understanding how this works.  What is the US Visa Waiver Program? What is an ESTA? For a vector space $V$ and a linear operator $f : V \to V$, under what conditions does $V = \ker(f) \oplus \operatorname{im}(f)$?  Is it always true, or only in special cases?  Edit: $V$ is finite dimensional. From the command line is it possible to open a package installer window (not install the application).  I understand I could run the application using sudo installer -pkg ..... -target ....... Instead i would like to open the package in a similar way to if I double clicked the package within the Finder. Chrome S3 Cloudfront: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header on initial XHR request Find the point which is furthest away from existing points while remaining within the convex hull A script on AIX which checks the number of parameters passed and complains if they are not correct:-  if [ "$#" -ge 1 ]; then   ... else   echo 'Usage: myscript &lt;a&gt; [b] [c]' fi   The script sets some environment variables so it is sourced. By that I mean I type the following on my command line. There is no second script, I am not sourcing a script from within another script.  . ./myscript.sh   If I pass it no parameters, I expect it to print out the usage statement but instead it runs using the parameters passed to the previous command that was sourced (not necessarily even this script!).  To double check this I added this line at the beginning of my script to prove that this was the case.  echo $# $@   If I pass it no parameters, it prints out the number and the list of parameters from a previously sourced script.  How do I get it to say $# is zero when I pass it zero parameters and source it?  The smallest possible recreate is a script thus:-  myscript.sh  echo $# $@   and then run it thus:-  . ./myscript.sh a b c   which prints out  3 a b c   then run it again without any parameters thus:-  . ./myscript.sh   which prints out the same  3 a b c   when you would expect it to print out  0   If you don't source the script and just run it thus:-  ./myscript.sh   then it works as expected and prints out  0   I hope that clarifies the issue at hand.  Since I seem to be getting lots of answers to explain why the above doesn't work and no answers to tell me what I should do instead, I thought I would have one more attempt at trying to explain what I am trying to do.  Requirement  I need to write a script that expects at least one parameter and complains if it is not invoked with a said parameter (see the first block of code in my question above), and this script needs to set some environment variables. Because of this second requirement I have assumed that I need to source the script so that the environment variables are still set when the script completes. How can you write a script that can tell when it has not been passed parameters that is also able to set an environment variable? [Firmware Bug]: TSC_DEADLINE disabled due to Errata - what should I do about this? Should I always use a comma after "e.g." or "i.e."? It seems that "e.g." is always followed by a comma but "i.e." is not. Why is that? I've come across a small issue which occurs when a question has been closed but the question itself or one of its answers are being edited.  Steps to reproduce:   Visit a closed question. (even closed years ago)   In a different tab or browser, edit the question or one of its answers. "an edit has been made to this post; click to load" message will appear above the edited post in the first tab/browser, click it. The .question-status div becomes hidden, which includes the closed notice below a question and, for a duplicate-closed question, the list of duplicates above the question body. This gives the appearance that the question is no longer closed (until you refresh).   Some screenshots:                I know it isn't common/important but it did confuse me when looking at a particularly bad question - I thought it had been reopened.   Is this an intentional feature? If so, what was the thinking behind it?    Another example  Before    After Transforming multiple rows into a single row Ugly 'post date' alignment on user profile when the date wraps into multiple lines