How to add metadata and tags to folders in Windows 10? How could I add metadata and tags to folders? I know that I can add metadata and tags to files supported by File Explorer. For unsupported files, I use , but it seems not supporting adding metadata and tags for folders. I'm using Windows 10.    There's  that's asking about adding files/folders metadata for Windows 7. My question is asking about adding metadata as well as tags specifically for folders on Windows 10.
How can I add metadata to NTFS files/folders? I want to tag different file types (i.e. .pdf, .epub, .iso, .bin, folders,..) using the same descriptive fields. For example i would like a metadata field "type" which would be "eBook" on pdf- and epub-files, "CD-Image" on iso- and bin-files.  I read about Alternate Data Streams (ADS) to make this possible. Does anyone know a good program for Windows 7 to tag different files and search for them? It is important for me, that the metadata is NOT stored in a separate database. I move the files a lot and need to stay flexible (ADSs 'stick' to the files).  Any ideas?
Countability of disjoint intervals According this problem/solution set from an MIT class (http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-100c-analysis-i-spring-2006/exams/exam1_sol.pdf), the assertion:  "Every collection of disjoint intervals in R is countable."  is True, because "every interval contains a rational number", and the rationals are countable.  It seems to me this should be False, with possible counterexample:  { [x,x] | x is an element of R}  ie the set of all singelton intervals on R. Why isn't this a valid counterexample? I wonder about the Adjustments to Cost Basis after a wash sale occur. Considering this  ( from marketwatch.com) where someone: On 1 Dec, 2018 used an amount of money in his account to buy 100 shares of XYZ Co., for $2000 (to make it simple , let's say 1 Feb, 2019 to turn all the transactions into the same year) On 1 Apr, 2019 he sells the shares for $1200, and incurred a loss of 800$. On 10 Apr, 2019 he bought back 100 shares for $1300, and had a wash sale. The 800$ loss gets added to the cost basis of this transaction( and the basis becomes $2100) Now, If on 13 Apr 2019, he sold 100 shares for $1400; I'm pretty sure that the realized Gain/Loss record of this transaction would show something like this: &quot; XYZ Co. shares  100 , Proceeds $1400 , Cost basis  $2100(adjusted), Short-term Gain/Loss  -$700 &quot;. So, even though the Gain/Loss shows a negative number, he still got an actual profit of $100 from this sale, right? One thing I liked about Mint was that the terminal would usually show two colors: everything from the left to the $ would be one color, and everything past the $ would be another.   Is there a way to have this setup with Ubuntu? I have a very simple question. When I do this:  \catcode`\@=0 \catcode`\\=11 @mycommand{a} @catcode`@\=0 \catcode`\@=11   It works perfectly and calls \mycommand correctly. However, when I try to define \mycommand with similar trickery:  \newcommand\mycommand[1]{   \catcode`\@=0   \catcode`\\=11   @textbf{Hello #1}   @catcode`@\=0   \catcode`\@=11 }   compilation stalls and gives me the * prompt. If I give it Ctrl+D, it terminates without producing any output. Indeed, it seems that changing the catcodes inside a command has no effect whatsoever, because the following works perfectly (whereas, from my understanding, it shouldn't):  \newcommand\mycommand[1]{   \catcode`\@=0   \catcode`\\=11   \textbf{Hello #1} }   Can anybody please explain to me what's happening? Show $\operatorname{Aut}(C_2 \times C_2)$ is isomorphic to $S_3=D_6$ How do I compare version numbers in Python? How do I get the linksys WUSB6300 wireless adapter to work on linux Martingale formulation of Bellman's Optimality Principle From David Williams' Probability with Martingales     Related question:   What I tried: For no 2, if $\ln Z_n - n \alpha$ is a supermartingale, then for $m &lt; n$, $$E[\ln Z_n - n \alpha | \mathscr F_m] \le \ln Z_m - m \alpha$$ $$ \to E[\ln Z_N - N \alpha | \mathscr F_0] \le \ln Z_0 - 0 \alpha$$ $$ \to E[\ln Z_N - N \alpha] \le \ln Z_0$$ $$ \to E[\ln \frac{Z_N}{Z_0}] \le N \alpha$$ Is that right?  For no 1, for $m &lt; n$, $$E[\ln Z_n - n \alpha | \mathscr F_m] = E[\ln Z_n | \mathscr F_m] - n \alpha$$ $$ = E[\ln \frac{Z_n}{Z_0} | \mathscr F_m] - n \alpha + \ln Z_0$$ $$ = E[\ln \frac{Z_n}{Z_{n-1}} | \mathscr F_m] + ... + E[\ln \frac{Z_{m+1}}{Z_{m}} | \mathscr F_m]$$ $$+ \ln \frac{Z_m}{Z_{m-1}} + ... + \ln \frac{Z_{1}}{Z_{0}} - n \alpha + \ln Z_0$$ Note that $$Z_n - Z_{n-1} \le |Z_n - Z_{n-1}| \le C_n |\epsilon_n - \epsilon_{n-1}| \le 2C_n \le 2Z_{n-1}$$ Also, I think $$\ln \frac{Z_n}{Z_{n-1}} \le |Z_n - Z_{n-1}|$$ Hence we have $$E[\ln \frac{Z_n}{Z_{n-1}} | \mathscr F_m] + ... + E[\ln \frac{Z_{m+1}}{Z_{m}} | \mathscr F_m]$$ $$+ \ln Z_m - n \alpha$$ $$\le E[2Z_{n-1} | \mathscr F_m] + ... + E[2Z_{m} | \mathscr F_m]$$ $$+ \ln Z_m - n \alpha$$ $$= 2(E[Z_{n-1} | \mathscr F_m] + ... + E[Z_{m} | \mathscr F_m])$$ $$+ \ln Z_m - n \alpha$$ One thing to do would be to show that $$2E[Z_{n-1} | \mathscr F_m] + ... + 2E[Z_{m} | \mathscr F_m] \le (n-m) \alpha$$ possibly by showing that $2E[Z_{\{\cdot\}} | \mathscr F_m] \le \alpha$ How would I do that? Something else: $$E[\ln \frac{Z_n}{Z_m} | \mathscr F_m] + \ln Z_m - n \alpha$$ $$ \le E[|Z_n - Z_m| | \mathscr F_m] + \ln Z_m - n \alpha$$ $$ \le E[2Z_m | \mathscr F_m] + \ln Z_m - n \alpha$$ $$ \le 2Z_m + \ln Z_m - n \alpha$$ Now $2Z_m \le (n-m) \alpha?$ We have $$2Z_m = 2\sum_{k=1}^{m} C_k(\epsilon_k - \epsilon_{k-1})$$ $$\le 2\sum_{k=1}^{m} Z_{k-1}$$ I'm not quite sure how to show that $$2\sum_{k=1}^{m} Z_{k-1} \le (n-m)\alpha$$ if that's even true. How can/else can I approach this problem?  For no 3, no idea. Any hints? I think it has something to do with a stopping time. Might we have to use the ff lemma (red box):    ? Why does an object with a glossy shader render in black? When I apply a glossy shader to the material of my text, the text becomes just black. Why?    I have lamp and everything, but the problem persists. The text is red before I add the glossy shader.  I'm using Cycles render.   Thanks! How to write this boolean expression using only NOR gates? I'm having some trouble understanding how I can convert a boolean expression to a NOR-gate only expression.   What I'm working with looks like \$T = A B' C + A' B C' + A B\$. How would I go into implementing it with NOR gates? Flag apron shows superfluous closing anchor tag I awoke this morning to a spam flag on a site I moderate, and noticed this when I went to read the post.    Notice answered&lt;/a&gt;, which I imagine isn't meant to have the &lt;/a&gt; there.  I also confirmed that this displays asked&lt;/a&gt; for other types of flags (namely, closed without comment).   I looked around for a duplicate of this but can't seem to find it, so maybe it's a recent change? Is there an upside down caret character? I have to maintain a large number of classic ASP pages, many of which have tabular data with no sort capabilities at all. Whatever order the original developer used in the database query is what you're stuck with.  I want to to tack on some basic sorting to a bunch of these pages, and I'm doing it all client side with javascript. I already have the basic script done to sort a given table on a given column in a given direction, and it works well as long as the table is limited by certain conventions we follow here.    What I want to do for the UI is just indicate sort direction with the caret character ( ^ ) and ... what?  Is there a special character that is the direct opposite of a caret?  The letter v won't quite cut it.  Alternatively, is there another character pairing I can use? How do I color table columns? I've found question , but the link to the documentation isn't helping me at all.  I'd like to know how to color a table column given my column code, but the documentation only gives the syntax of the command. It doesn't give any code example of where to use it.  \usepackage{colortbl}  \begin{table}[h]     \centering     \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}         \hline         \cellcolor[gray]{0.8}128&amp;64&amp;32&amp;16&amp;8&amp;4&amp;2&amp;1\\\hline         1&amp;0&amp;1&amp;1&amp;0&amp;1&amp;0&amp;1\\\hline     \end{tabular} \end{table}   As you can see, I got \cellcolor to work, but I don't want to color individual cells. I want to color a whole column of the table. Does anybody know how I can go about to do this? I know Newton's third law of motion might be the answer for this but still I am wondering how the rockets could thrust in the empty space and move in the opposite direction. I guess an astronaut wouldn't be able to push in the empty space with his hands or legs to move himself, but with a rocket engine it's possible. How? What might be the explanation for this in General Relativity? Why we use $L_2$ Space In QM? I asked this question for many people/professors without getting a sufficient answer, why in QM Lebesgue spaces of second degree are assumed to be the one that corresponds to the Hilbert vector space of state functions, from where this arises? and why 2-order space that assumes the following inner product:  $\langle\phi|\psi\rangle =\int\phi^{*}\psi\,dx$  While there is many ways to define the inner product.  In Physics books, this always assumed as given, never explains it, also I tried to read some abstract math books on this things, and found some concepts like "Metric weight" that will be minimized in such spaces, even so I don't really understand what is behind that, so why $L_2$? what special about them? Who and how physicists understood that those are the one we need to use? How do you guys go about controlling column padding in tables?   Update  To clarify, I'm looking for a way to control both vertical and horizontal padding. So, if I had a simple table like in the following code snippet, I could pad the columns and make them look a bit less... ugly. :P   \begin{tabular}{|l|l|}     \hline     column 1 &amp; column 2 \\      \hline     I really would like this less &amp; crammed\\     \hline \end{tabular}   I tried this by using the command \vspace but it leaves gaps in the vertical lines. How can I install apt packages non-interactively? Create WiFi hotspot on ubuntu Good textbooks on homological algebra Show that $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}} = U_{e} \oplus U_{o}$ A function $f : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is called even if $f(-x) = f(x)$ $ \forall x \in \mathbb{R}  $   A function $f : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is called odd if $f(-x) = -f(x)$ $ \forall x \in \mathbb{R}  $   Let $U_{e}$ denote the set of real-valued even functions on $\mathbb{R}$ and let $U_{o}$ denote the set of real valued odd functions on $\mathbb{R}$.   Show that $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}} = U_{e} \oplus U_{o}$   This question from Q24 of "Linear Algebra Done Right" 3rd Edition - Chp 1.4 (Subspaces). The author of the book does minimal work with functions during the chapter. I have no idea how to approach the question.