You are an excellent assistant at categorizing sexism in tweets. Sexism is defined as prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.

Here are the category definitions:

1. Ideological and inequality. This category includes all tweets that discredit the feminist movement in order to devalue, belittle and defame the struggle of women in any aspect
of their lives. It also includes messages that reject inequality between men and women, or present men as victims of gender-based oppression. Some examples of this type of sexism discourse can be found in the following tweets:  "#Feminism is a war on men, but it's also a war on women. It's a war on female nature, a war on femininity."
2. Role stereotyping and dominance. This category includes messages that express false ideas about women that suggest they are more suitable or inappropriate for certain tasks. It also includes any claim that implies that men are somehow superior to women. "Most women no longer have the desire or the knowledge to develop a high quality character, even if they wanted to."
3. Objectification. Objectification and physical stereotyping includes messages where women are presented as objects apart from their dignity and personal aspects. We also include messages that assume or describe certain physical qualities that women must have in order to fulfill traditional gender roles, for example, ideas that suggest that women should maintain a standard and ideal of beauty or attacks on a woman's physique. "No offense but I've never seen an attractive african american hooker. Not a single one"
4. Sexual violence. This category includes messages where sexual suggestions, requests or harassment of a sexual nature (rape or sexual assault) are made: "I wanna touch your tits..you can't imagine what I can do on your body"
5. Misogyny and non sexual violence: this category includes expressions of hatred and violence towards women: "Domestic abuse is never okay.... Unless your wife is a bitch."
6. Not sexist. No sexism present in the text.

For this task, you will be shown a tweet. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, categorize the tweet into ONLY ONE of the six categories by using the following labels:

1. ideological inequality
2. stereotyping dominance
3. sexual violence
4. misogyny and/or non-sexual violence
5. objectification
6. not sexist


Tweet:

Chapter 1: Introduction (Part 1 of 2)… socialism, by no means an invention of nineteenth century Marxism but much older, must be conceptualized as an institutionalized interference with or aggression against private property and private property claims. Capitalism, on the other hand, is a social system based on the explicit recognition of private property and of nonaggressive, contractual exchanges between private property owners. Implied in this remark, as will become clear in the course of this treatise, is the belief that there must then exist varying types and degrees of socialism and capitalism, i.e., varying degrees to which private property rights are respected or ignored. Societies are not simply capitalist or socialist. Indeed, all existing societies are socialist to some extent. …… the overall degree of interference with property rights that exists in a given country, explains its overall wealth. The more socialist a country, the more hampered will be the process of production of new and the upkeep of old, existing wealth, and the poorer the country will remain or become. …… For one thing, in analyzing different types of socialism for which there exist real, historical examples (examples which, to be sure, very often are not called socialism, but are given a more appealing name), it is important to explain why, and in what way, every intervention anywhere, big or small, here or there, produces a particular disruptive effect on the social structure which a superficial, theoretically untrained observer, blinded by an immediate positive  consequence of a particular intervention, might not perceive. Yet this negative effect nonetheless exists, and with some delay will cause problems at a different place in the social fabric more numerous or severe than the ones originally solved by the initial act of intervening. Thus, for instance, highly visible positive effects of socialist policies such as cheap food prices, low rents, free this and free that, are not just positive things hanging in midair, unconnected to everything else, but rather are phenomena that have to be paid for somehow: by less and lower quality food, by housing shortages, decay and slums, by queuing up and corruption, and, further, by lower living standards, reduced capital-formation, and / or increased capital consumption. And a much less conspicuous but almost always positively mentioned fact — a greater feeling of solidarity among the people, the greater value attached to things like family, relatives, or friends, which is found to exist between, for instance, the East Germans as compared to their more individualistic, egoistic West / German counterparts — is again not a simple, isolated, unanalyzable fact. Such feelings are the result of a social system of constant shortages and of continually repressed opportunities to improve one’s situation by one’s own means. In East Germany, in order to accomplish the most simple routine tasks, such as a house repair which in other countries requires no more than a telephone call, you simply must rely more heavily on personal relations (as compared to impersonal business relations); and where someone’s public life is under constant observation by society, you simply have to go private. …
6. not sexist