On Stack Overflow, when you search for "ceres-solver", you find (today) . Almost all related to . When I posted a new question on this library earlier today, I created the new tag "ceres-solver", fine.  Then, I started adding the tag to the few first questions of the search result. But I'm wondering if there could be a way to add a new tag to a bunch of questions at once, rather than having to edit them all one by one....doing so is a real pain, and it would really make sense to add the tag to all those posts...
123529
Is it possible to tag multiple questions at the same time? If not, should this feature be added?  I've wanted to do this several times when I do a search for a topic, and many of the matches do not have a certain important tag, but should.  For example, a search for "boost asio -[boost-asio]" returns a lot of questions that are extremely specific (not just perpherially related) to boost::asio, and should have the [boost-asio] tag. Adding the tag to each of them individually is possible, but it would be less daunting if there was a way to mark the appropriate questions from the search results and tag them all at once. (Even if this is a bad example for some reason, hopefully you get the idea).  I'm anticipating arguments that this shouldn't be possible because it would make it too easy for people to mistag things in batch. In that case, I'd argue that it similarly also makes it easier for people to fix things in batch, and should only be available for folks with high enough privileges that we should trust them anyway.
81240
It seems most of the questions tagged  on Stack Overflow are just intended to indicate "there's something wrong with my program", which would cover probably at least 80% of all questions on Stack Overflow.  There are some questions where it seems to refer to a possible bug in a framework or utility. I'm not sure the tag is really all that useful in that case either.  What does meta think?
68531
I searched for "stack overflow" in the search bar, but it doesn't list the results normally. Instead, it redirects me to the tag .  Why is this happening, and how can I search for posts literally containing "stack overflow"?
69290
I noticed today that I can add a tag to my "favorite tag" list that does not yet exist.  I then went to ask a question using that tag and was told I do not yet have enough rep to create new tags.    So my question is this:    If someone else creates that same tag, do I get any credit for coming up with it first (as shown by the fact that I listed it in my favorite tag list), or is the fact that it appears in my favorite list, even though it doesn't yet exist, just a placeholder for when it does.
69141
Is there a way to get notified if a new question is posted in one of my Favorite tag other than me clicking on the tag or browsing through new questions all the times?  I have a favorite tag (Bloomberg) with low monthly number of questions in it (around 30-40).  And since I can be of great help in that area to other people, I would like to see if there a notification system in place (such as email).
50936
The /tools route shows you a list of the 30 (?) newest tags on the site, including how often they've been used.  Now, this is nice information to have, and occasionally I check the route to kill off meaningless tags before they're getting used too much. However, it seems I'm only one of the very few people on Super User who do that.    Since the list only shows 30 tags, it's a little hard to analyze properly. You can't see when the tag was created and who created it. (Let's face it: There are some people who have a passion for creating meaningless tags.) Also, you have to remove a tag in that list before the next one shows up, which is a little tedious.  For example. in the above list, I had to kill ,  and  before I even saw  and .  Could moderators (and 10k users?) please get a table of the newest tags that'd allow them to see more than 30 at once, and also including the information who created the tag?  This would allow for much easier maintenance, even when you forget to do it for the last 30 days and have no way to check tags that were created, say 31 days ago.
66820
I'm trying to get the Weed-Eater hat on Stack Overflow. To do so, I'm looking at the list of questions . The problem is, no tags show up there, and so it's rather difficult to see which ones I have a shot at. Any chance of showing the tags on this page?  I realize that getting this before Winter Bash is over would be difficult, but it would be good to keep such things in mind for the future.
119536
Today, I asked my first question on WebApps.SE: . (I'm fairly active on other SE sites.) My question was about a web app that didn't have a tag created for it yet, and since I don't have 300 rep on the site, I wasn't able to create the appropriate tags. Looking over the list of tags already on the site, none of them looked like they would have been appropriate for my question.  What is the right course of action in this situation?
10465
Please support the use of nested expressions like  and (or ) when searching.  Looking here, on meta, at questions tagged   and at questions found with +search +tag +boolean I didn't see any information on this topic.
16135
I was browsing around the new  and when I browsed to the  I was greeted with an "edit tag wiki" link. So I edited it and created some text. Very cool.  So I have a few questions.   What is the requirement to be able to edit this tag wiki? I clearly can't do it on all tags, so I'm guessing there is some activity requirement within the tag space before you get the ability to edit the wiki. What should the content be? I browsed around a little, but I couldn't find any other examples with any content. I just included some basic text for the  one. "Questions relating to the Microsoft .NET framework" with a link to http://www.microsoft.com/net/.
32704
Can someone please create the tag  on our site? We need to have it because        Foo is a recent/upcoming release / edition / model / episode of a popular, established OS / board game / bike brand / TV show   Foo is a hot new language / ingredient / game   we're currently using some other tag for questions about Foo, but it's causing ambiguity with a separate thing that's also named Foo      This is not a joke post. We get a lot of feature requests that ask for this or that tag to be created, and every time, a discussion ensues wherein people explain that there is no "tag creation department" and that community members create tags just by using them. I'm posting this "question" so that future requests of that type can be closed as a duplicate of this, saving time and eliminating redundant conversations for everyone involved.     See also:
67535
I am requesting for a new flag so that we can immediately flag questions in which people are asking for help on a problem from an ongoing contest, and if there is anything related to code or the algorithm in that question, it is deleted permanently from the view of others.  I am asking for this because I have seen a few questions, in which the OP was asking us to help fix their code on Stack Overflow. The Code they posted was from an ongoing contest on , and that would be considered cheating.  On codechef, we are told to not share anything from code, algorithm, or anything related to a problem from an ongoing contest, but since users are unable to ask their questions there, they come to Stack Overflow and ask it there.  Up till now, when I encounter questions like that, I flag them for moderator attention explaining the reason ( I don't have enough reputation to vote to close ).   I have not been a user on SO for long, but I have met a few questions like this already. This is one  . It's already deleted, but I think there should be a quick way to flag it so that it is brought to the notice of moderators quickly so that the code is not leaked. ( I don't want to increase the Work load on moderators, but something similar would be useful ).  So I request a new flag so that these questions can be flagged quickly to prevent the leaking of code and also make it easier, rather than having to type a good reason and wait for a moderator to accept it.  Please forgive me If this is a Duplicate as I could not find anything related to this on MSE yet.
109819
Over on , I have just tried to create a tag synonym of  for &dagger; since there seems to be some confusion as to which to use, and people end up adding both.  &dagger; Although looking at the tag synonyms of  here, I should probably have done it the other way around.  Instead of just creating the synonym as I expected, it showed me  (which obviously I couldn't vote on myself) as if I were not a moderator. I guess I should have noticed that the button said "Suggest" rather than "Create", but elsewhere on the site, diamond moderator 'suggestions' are rather more binding. *8')  It was then suggested that I needed to do this via the moderation tools, so I had a hunt around and managed to find the moderator tool for tag synonyms and approve my own synonym from there. I now see however that just clicking on the  link would have taken me there anyway.  It seems odd that we can't just create the tag synonym directly from the tag synonym page, and the suggestion mechanism breaks the expectation of moderator suggestions being immediately binding (like flags), so it would be nice if this behaviour could be made more consistent.   Incidentally, I fully expect this to be , and rightly so since it only saves one click, but at least this post will serve as a searchable answer for future diamond moderators who are confused about this. *8')
52754
Tag editing appears to be fairly random. It seems to me that the point of tags is to help me find stuff.  For instance, I use the [c#] tag to find questions on C# - one of my specialities.  Why do people keep editing tags to say [subjective] or [off-topic]? Why would I ever want to search for subjective questions?  Is this just the (still unattainable) Librarian badge calling? I'm sure we'll all get it eventually.  I tend to edit tags in the following circumstances:   The tag might help the asker get a useful answer - for instance if they've missed a C# tag on a clearly C# question. The tag might help those answering - for instance if they've failed to specify .Net 3.5 but are asking about Linq (only added in 3.5) They've put one tag where another different one might be appropriate - for instance "sql" and "2005" instead of"sql2005".   I'm not sure of the point in:   "subjective", "off-topic", etc - why bother with a tag? "duplicate" - there's a close option for this. "coding", "programming", "software" - aren't they all? "meta-discussion", etc - surely the "stackoverflow" tag already states that?   There seems to be some fairly pointless tag editing going on - with no agreement on when we should edit them.  What rules do you follow? When would you re-tag? When wouldn't you? Am I missing something? Do some people find [subjective] a really useful tag?  I've split the debate on subjective out into a .
52910
Using search for new questions returns yesterday's and older posts for many sites. Tested for localized Stack Overflow...            and other sites such as , , , etc.  English Stack Overflow . So does   Possibly related to my previous bug report:   Seems this happens again. Now for SO and MSE too.
42881
When I perform a search, the result entries display the relevant tags, but only if it is a question link. If it's an answer link, there are no tags displayed. Sometimes I can easily infer the language, platform or technology, by reading the title and the excerpt -- but sometimes not, requiring me a visit to the question page. I suggest that when answers are displayed as search result entries, these entries include the tags of the parent question.
57222
I am a user on Stack&nbsp;Overflow, and I think every page that shows questions, display all tags and the questions. Are the tags saved in a tags table or are they included together with the questions table?