I have gather* section with three lines. the lines appear all bunched up with hardly any space between them. How can I spread them out a little?  I tried \belowdisplayskip=12pt but no matter what value I chose there was no discernible difference to anything  \f{gather*}     R_{address} = \frac{4700}{\left(\frac{17}{\mathrm{Address} - 15.5} - 1\right)} \\*      \mathrm{Address} = \frac{17}{\left(\frac{4700}{R_{address}} + 1\right)} + 15.5      \mathrm{Address} \in [16\mathrel{{.}\,{.}}\nobreak 31] \\* \f}    Where \f{environment} is equivalent to begin{environment} for Doxygen that I am using.
124013
How can I stretch the spacing between consecutive lines in an align* environment? I have a few lines with \fracs in which both the numerator and the denominator consist of textual phrases, not math symbols, and the result looks too cluttered.  \begin{align*} X &amp;= \frac{\textit{Some text here}}{\textit{And some text here}}\\ Y &amp;= \frac{\textit{Will make everything}}{\textit{Look too close together}} \end{align*}
52610
I have a project in ArcGIS (ArcMap 10.2) where I want to identify naturally occurring dense spots of points and then form groups in that dense area, where points are within 45 miles of each other. This would mean that not so dense areas will be left out and not become part of any group?   I don't have access to Point Density tool. I run Python code for Grouping Analysis but I get errors due to Python or GIS version mismatch.
112861
I've tried defining the following custom environment, but I get errors:     \begin{gather} ended by \end{solution}   etc...   Here's a MWE showing my problem:  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage[fleqn]{mathtools}  \newenvironment{solution}{%  &lt;-Solution   \par\addvspace{1em}   \itshape{Solution:}\par\begin{gather}}   {\end{gather}\par\normalfont\hfill\qed\par\addvspace{\medskipamount}}%  \begin{document}   \begin{gather}     testing   \end{gather}    %% This does not work:   \begin{solution}     testing   \end{solution} \end{document}
111468
Is there a command or package which would allow me to draw a line in the largest available space in the way that \hfill fills up the remaining space in a line?  i.e., a command to draw a line from the end of the text, wherever it happens to fall, to the right edge of the textwidth (leaving space for any additional text indented to be at the end of the line)?
101401
I have complicated math expression:    Vertical spacing between text and fraction line is too small. I tried to define new \frac command (with amsmath package) with adjustable vertical spaces. As you can see, the result is not satisfying:    \documentclass[a4paper,fleqn,leqno]{article} \usepackage{polyglossia} \usepackage{color,pifont,fontspec} \usepackage[top=2.54cm,bottom=2.54cm,left=2.54cm,right=2.54cm]{geometry} \usepackage{tikz,tikz-3dplot,graphicx} \usepackage{mathtools,breqn,amsmath} \usepackage[fontsize=12]{scrextend} \usepackage{array,multirow} \usepackage{pgfplots} \DeclareMathSizes{12}{14}{14}{10} \newcommand{\myfrac}[3][0pt]{\genfrac{}{}{}{}{\raisebox{#1}{$#2$}}{\raisebox{-#1}{$#3$}}} \begin{document} \begin{dmath*}[breakdepth={0},style={\mathindent=0pt},spread={10pt}] {n=\myfrac[3pt]{\myfrac[3pt]{0,0625N+0,0215}{2}-0,043}{\myfrac[3pt]{\myfrac[3pt]{\scriptstyle 0,0625N+0,0215}{\scriptstyle 2}-0,043}{\myfrac[3pt]{\scriptstyle N}{\scriptstyle 2}-1}+0,0215}} \end{dmath*} \end{document}   How can I enlarge verticall spacing in whole fraction?
33114
--Revised-- I am looking at a math workbook for teenagers. This one has the following structure:  1.Main Chapter 1.1 Subchapter 1.11 Task 1 a) problem 1   b) problem 2   c) problem 3 d) problem 4   e) problem 5 1.12 Task 2 etc. ...  Many of the math problems are very small and the natural thing would be to have them on line, horizontally. However an expression is often broken and aligned at the equal sign. Not unlike an equation (but not). Secondly, when the line that contain the structure breaks, the item indicators also align, presuming the use of an enumerated list. How can I reasonably assume this is done? Does it have to be a forced method, as a table, or can it be a flexible one, like inline?
30984
If I type something like this:  {\itshape\LARGE   Dunt venim dolorerosto do odit   ametum vulla conum dolore   conulput in vero od el   Dunt venim dolorerosto do odit   ametum vulla conum dolore   conulput in vero od el }   it results in a block of 4 lines with narrow spacing between the 1st and 2nd line and between the 3rd and 4th line. Line spacing between the 2nd and 3rd line is normal.  I can't fully explaing it to myself so I am looking for a short description for this behaviour. I know for example that with a \par at the end of the text (inside the group), the calculation would correct. But I have no idea why...
51911
What is the name of the horizontal division line? Is there a name for it other than "division line?
115839
I would like to write the following conversion factor in LaTeX, I've been looking in different manuals and I can't find anything. I hope you can help me.    I have come to the following, but the problem is that I am not able to put spaces between spaces. And, ideally, things that are the same could be crossed out:  30 mL dis \times \frac{0,1 mol NaOH}{10^{3} mL} \times  ...
34668
\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}   X_i =    \begin{cases}     \left[\begin{smallmatrix}       0 \\ 1 \\ 2     \end{smallmatrix}\right]     &amp;     \text{if $i$ is even;}     \\     \left[\begin{smallmatrix}       2 \\ 1 \\ 0     \end{smallmatrix}\right]     &amp;     \text{otherwise.}   \end{cases} \end{equation*} \end{document}   This is the LaTeX code that I wrote based on a cases environment. There's no space between the matrices on the right. What's the best way to add some vertical spaces to separate them?    p.s. This is a simplified form of my original writing, so I cannot just accept suggestions like 'use a matrix transpose to transform the column vector into a row vector.'
66917
How can I align 2 paths perfectly? No matter what I do I get a little space (gap between the 2 paths I create, and they are straight lines not as I saw in other questions with pixel problems)  An example:    Between every triangle is a little space, like in the example. It isn't obvious and it doesn't bother, but if I use the image (as an SVG or something) it is really obvious.
83303
I need to display math in my report, but is it possible to remove the vertical space around align*?  A little example is the following (where I just want the align* to have the same vertical space as a \\  \documentclass[10pt,danish,a4paper,oneside,fleqn]{report}  \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{amsmath}  \begin{document}  ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss \begin{align*}   A{\cap}B\ &amp; =\ {\left\{{b,d,e}\right\}}{\;}{\cap}{\;}{\left\{{a,b,f,g}\right\}}   \\   \nonumber\ &amp; =\ {\left\{{b}\right\}} \end{align*} ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss \\ ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss  \end{document}
113645
I'm trying to choose the positions of my tables but I can't figure out the difference between [H] and [h]. I've seen both advised over my search. If I use [h] the row spacing is different than [H] use.
38290
I need to create a shapefile with crossed streets. I can't split the lines to number each segment with the house number ranges.
116716
I have one doubt on taking terminal row spacing from this below picture. In this picture, which one have to take &mdash; eB or E?
91240
I realize I posed this question, and got answers, several days ago (see ) , but none seem to really be working, and so am posing again.  Below are two screenshots that show the fields with field properties, and another showing the field calculator and the equation with the "answer" field populated by 0s. I apologize for them not being next to each other or in line with the appropriate text, but the web formatting keeps overlaying them.  Here is an overview of the problem: I am trying to do a in field calculator, where I'm trying to populate a new field with the values from a fairly simple equation of one field divided by another (Cnt1 by Pop1 in this case).  Both fields that I am dividing are double, and the value, while small is not infinitesimal, approx 0.01765.    I have tried creating various types of new fields: double, long, float, and played around with the scale/precision/properties, but everytime it returns "0" values. I know the values will be very small, i.e .04 but it doesn't seem to be a decimal display problem as I tried running it with Pop1/.4 and it correctly returned a decimal.   I've tested dividing the Cnt1 by .5 and that gives an appropriate decimal value, so it's not the new field format; the one thing that seems really strange is when I add (in field calculator python version): !Cnt1!+!Pop1! (which is 38+218699) I get 2.187, however, I suppose this could be related to the field being classified as float with precision=4, scale=3?    I've also tried the suggestions of @blord-castillo of doing:  1.0* (Cnt1/Pop1)   and also      1.0* (int(Cnt1/Pop1)) But neither works, I'm at my wits end on this one, and would greatly appreciate any help!
5446
How could I go about setting the 'above' and 'below' vspaces around the equation environment?  If the same could be done for the subequations or gather environments, this would be a bonus.