On the sidebar, if there are more than 3 digits in the votes, it starts to split into two lines, and the second line does not carry the background colour of the first line (For instance, green if it has an accepted answer) like so:    On a website like Meta.SE, such amounts of votes are common, so shouldn't it be necessary to fix this?
29960
The score for the 4 questions are 111, 1218, 261 and 5 respectively, but they display 2 digits per line. This is an obvious bug in design.
40415
I had an old question that I revisited in order to link it in a new answer. I noticed that in the comments Steven A Lowe had a funny comment that I -- at the time -- had responded to with "why can't I upvote comments?"  Well, of course, now I can.  So, I voted Steven's comment up then went to delete mine. I got the warning box that I can only submit comment votes once every 5 seconds. This seems like a bug to me. Deleting is not the same as voting.
94346
Recently, the  was introduced in order to replace the old FAQ! Which is really nice. But we lost a friend to battle, one minute for "Fragment Identifier", he was a good bro! We want it back!  Since votes are a lot different on the meta, we often have to link to the "vote section" of the meta article to help users learn more about the meta! The only problem I see is that now, when we link to the , there is no way to have a direct link to the vote section (which is the one we want to point out!). I understand that users that are redirected to that section should read the whole section and everything, but it would be nice to have an "id" on the Voting is different on meta title in order to enable us to link to it like before!  So adding an "id" like #vote-differences like it was before would be awesome! And make us able to link to   /helpcenter/whats-meta#vote-differences   To show directly the section we want to talk about! (And a beautiful highlight, as pointed out by Doorknob would be awesome! Or ponies, definitely ponies) Note that this is just one example! Every sub section could/should get one, because most user won't take the time reading a whole page. So if we can link to a specific section, there are more chances that the user read it!    As proposed, every "title" (which are currently bees) could get his own ID (Fragment Identifier) as it was before, and would gain of being an h2/h3/hwhatEverFits to really clear up the markup!
79471
Inspired  and at the risk of being downvoted to oblivion, I'd like to propose a feature request.  Can we automatically explain to people what downvotes mean on Meta?  I am getting tired of seeing people on Meta ask about why they were downvoted with no comment, whine and complain and boo hoo hoo. Votes on meta are different!  I understand, I was new to Meta once too...  Can we somehow show   automatically when someone tries to ask why they were downvoted on Meta?  Here's some freehand circles to help you guys know how serious I am:    (Yes I am pretty well aware this will just be another  question)
44421
What happened to the close vote option for posts that describe an error or unexpected result but don't include the relevant code or any code!? This is on of the two most popular I use.. What am I supposed to do about questions like  now!?  I just also noticed "must show minimal understanding" is missing as well. After reading over the new option again, I am supposing that the intention is to use "not likely to be helpful for future viewers" for both of these?
16270
It seems "See votes, expandable user card" goes on a second line on the activity page of the user profile resulting in a pretty bad look:    You can see it live on  (though of course that may change any day now depending on their rep-growth).  I'm using Chrome Version 67.0.3396.99 (Official Build) (64-bit)
87912
The top bar is showing (again) the suggested edits count and 10K flags count, like it was before.  On Stack Overflow it looks like this: (that's the original color, same as in old top bar)        And on this very Meta site:        Same top bar. But different colors! Consistency broken.  I've just noticed the suggested edits count on Meta:        Black on black, I can see just a floating number - really confusing and out of any context.  In the name of Consistency, can we please have the same color on all sites?
35271
"Should" word in italics is shifted down in the vote-to-close popup when there is at least one pending close vote.  Just have a look at this:        Now without close votes:        So the issue occurs when there is a close vote on it. It doesn't look good.    Tested on Chrome 27.0.1453.116 m, Windows XP. And it looks fine on Firefox 21.0 and Opera 12.02 (Windows XP)  Here is an example of a slightly different but obviously related problem in Windows 7 SP1 and Firefox 21.0:    This seems to have something to do with how line-height and/or margin attributes are being interpreted.  Can this be fixed?
33290
Just noticed a minor css issue on this question:    The related questions on the right hand side have some overlapping text in Chrome:        (This only applies to this very site, Meta Stack Exchange)
88534
Looking at the flags in the moderator queue, I noticed the following automatic flag.    Clicking on the &quot;review task&quot; link I see the following.    The votes are actually one for deletion and one for &quot;looks good.&quot; Such situation should not be reported as &quot;more delete votes than 'looks good'&quot;; either the text should be fixed to not indicate &quot;more&quot; reviews, or a flag should not be raised in this case.
21390
I believe that showing the post score for nomination posts during primaries is a bad idea.  When I loaded the primaries page during the election, the first thing I saw was a post voted -1. This immediately colored my impression of the post. Reading his post didn't indeed make me wish he was a moderator, but at the same point I couldn't bring myself to click on the down arrow. He wasn't an awesome candidate, but he wasn't a -2 score candidate either. Actually, I kinda wanted to sympathy upvote instead.  I want to judge by myself whether a candidate is worth or not my +1. For some of those people I don't have an opinion already, and I want to form one on my own. I don't want game theory to kick in, I don't want to be tricked into sympathy upvotes.  Having those numbers in large print as the first thing I see about them honestly prevents me from doing so. I'd rather have their avatar there.     Some people on chat do not agree with me;  I imagine they'll post explaining why I want to be aware of their opinion while forming my own.      Regardless of the discussion here, if you do prefer to hide the scores as you vote, here's the jQuery oneliner that does just that:  $(".vote-count-post").hide()
35712
I've found strange behavior when closing this  - I definitely see that there are 3 closing votes and 2 of them are at "Off-topic" section:   -but there are no explanations on section itself:   -while, normally, it's expected that it will appear. In custom comments section there are also no closing-votes displayed.   Perhaps it's just my browser (which is FF 26 x64 under Win) - so marking this as a "possible bug". Thank you for your attention.
67524
Related to these questions:    When viewing the Meta user profile, the difference between questions with accepted answers and questions without is pretty subtle. At first glance, I couldn't tell the difference at all. Can the contrast between the styles be increased a bit to make it easier to see?     This screenshot doesn't look too bad, but when looking at a list going down a whole page, it gets a bit difficult to pick one out at a glance. (I'm guessing even more so for some of the color-challenged users)
9121
I have noticed that while asking questions and scrolling to the bottom of the page, the right sidebar containing recent questions covers the footer partially. Also, a part of it goes beyond the browser's boundary. It may not be a big problem but it still doesn't look good.    This also happens on the  page
64993
Single-line comments show like two lines, simply to give space for the Vote and Flag icons, which are placed with above the other. Can these buttons be placed next to each other? This would allow single-line comments to look like single lines. Example:
102427
I have found a bug with the vote buttons on this question:    If the post cannot be voted on, why are there vote buttons? I also noticed that all answers except the first one can be voted on.
55921
Another meta question identified a bug that was marked as designed. To summarize the bug, the little number that appears next the Review link in the header shows an incorrect value most of the time.         I would like to propose that the feature be dropped. Honestly, I would prefer it be fixed, but the response to the question above gives me little faith that it will be. Half of the time, I click that little brown box and find out that I was lied to. There's nothing to review.  The little number no longer does the job it was created to do.        Oh sweet! Three things I can review!        Just kidding...