I'm always trying edit to make my questions better, but it seems it's not working so well.  Could you give me some advice on how I can improve my questions?  ...  Well, I'm banned again, help...  I've delete some of my poor questions.
117
If you are reading this, you may have been affected by one of our post quality bans. If so, it is important that you  to understand what has happened and how to regain the permissions that you lost. While trying to ask a question, one could see:  We are no longer accepting questions from this account. See  to learn more.  Likewise, for answers:  We are no longer accepting answers from this account. See  to learn more.   Why am I getting this message? Are deleted posts taken into account too? Is a question/answer ban the same as a suspension? How do I avoid getting a question ban? How long do I have to wait before I can post again? What can I do to release the ban? How can I reactivate my account? Can I simply create a new account? I'll just ask somewhere else on the SE network, and they'll migrate my question to the correct site! Will a ban on one Stack Exchange site affect my standing on other sites in the network? Does this apply to meta sites too? My account is in good standing. Why am I still blocked?
7895
While trying to ask a question, I got the error message     This question body does not meet our quality standards. Please make sure that it completely describes your problem - including what you have already tried - and is written using proper grammar.    Why am I getting this message? What can I do to get the system to accept my question? Can you be more specific? What are good resources on how to ask high-quality questions?      For more information, see  in the .
99544
It's a bit frustrating that, even though I'm above rep 100 on Stack Overflow, I'm still restricted with the most basic 'idiot prevention' limits on the other sites as I start there. Really, is it necessary to prevent me from creating a new tag or posting more than once in 20 minutes? I can see holding off edits, or even comments, until I've proved to have a brain in the domain in question.  You could see this as a request for a feature.
67715
I asked a couple of really bad (horrible!) questions here and got hit with a question ban. No surprise there – I was a new user, and now know where I went wrong. The problem is that I can't get question privileges back. The bad questions were bad enough that I don't think I could've edited them to be better – it wasn't formatting or style – the questions themselves were just bad questions, so I deleted them.   The  said that my question privileges would automatically be reinstated once my "positive contributions" outweighed my negative ones. I realize that it's done automatically, but as an extremely new coder, I really can't do much in the way of positive contributions except upvotes (if that can even be considered a contribution). What should I do to lift the ban?
114191
This is a bit of a nitpick, but on the  page on StackOverflow, it states that:  Questions that need improvement may be closed until someone fixes them.  This should probably be tweaked given the new  policy. The original also seems a tad passive to me -- perhaps it would be more helpful if it were reworded in a way to encourage new users to be proactive in editing their own questions to get them reopened?
16202
I have never posted on the  yet.  I just wrote my first question, but when I click "Post Your Question", I get "You can only post once every 40 minutes."  I haven't posted any question today on any Stack Exchange site.  I tried to report this on the , but I got the same issue.  Let's try here...
108415
About a month ago, we rolled out a new feature: . So far, the reception has been mostly positive, and I've definitely seen    posted in this form. But I've also seen something else, a side-effect you may have seen discussed here on MSO:     Ignore for a moment the specific details of the Q&amp;A pairs discussed in those two posts, and note the following: three poorly-asked questions, questions that ordinarily would have been closed, down-voted, and/or edited... But instead sparked a small outrage among the members who came across them. Now, we've known for years that self-answered questions can be problematic. Asking is hard. Answering is hard. Asking a question when you already know the answer can be even harder to do well. But that is - or rather, that should be - beside the point: plenty of people ask really terrible questions without bothering to answer them, and we've certainly managed to handle them over the years. If normal community-moderation is failing when it comes to self-answered questions, that's a problem. These are edge-cases at the moment. But if we're trying to encourage more use of this form to share knowledge on Stack Exchange (), it's something that needs to be faced. I'm presenting one possible solution below (in true gratuitous self-answer fashion), but what do you think? Would some other option work better? Is this even a real problem?
44958
Nice hole in the system... You can pretty much say anything in a revision comment and it cannot be removed or cleaned up by a mod.  See  for an example.  Mods need the ability to at least remove the comment, if not the ability to edit the text of it.
105021
Well, I already searched meta as well as cleared my browser cache.  I realize this may be a SO cache problem, but it still seems kind of strange to me.    The deleted question is (assuming it still exists).  Shouldn't deleted questions only be visible to 10k users?  I'm only at 2k.
101450
There are numerous posts on meta about editing questions with    Thank you. Thanks in advance Thank you, Sean Please help me!! im such a noob sorry for takin ur time   and many of them seem to conflict each other.  In my opinion, these edits are not too minor, even if that is the only thing wrong with the post. We shouldn't have a conditional policy "If there's nothing else worth editing, it's better to leave it alone" because then it sets an example to new users that it is OK to add such lines to their posts, and propagates confusion about what edits to allow and reject. I do agree if the post needs help in other areas, then simply removing "thanks" is too minor.  There seems to be a lot of confusion about whether these edits are acceptable, because I am continually rejected when making such edits. Of course, I edit the rest of the post if it needs it, but if the post is otherwise acceptable in its current form, then that is the only edit I make.  There needs to be some concrete and clear answer as to when these edits are acceptable.   See also:   My conflicting and confused experiences:           Note also: There are even scripts implemented to get rid of this garbage, but they are not perfect, and editors should be able to finish the job.
56844
A  appears to have been deleted, and deletion is attributed to a moderator,  deleted by Sathyajith Bhat♦ 12 hours ago , however,  (however, they did previously (unsuccessfully) tried migrating it to another site in the network where they're also a moderator, but migration was rejected by another moderator, it was then on hold on webapps, and then the hold was removed, which was supposed to have been the end of it).  Can someone explain what's going on here?  And restore the question that clearly wasn't meant to have been deleted, was a HNQ, and has 75 votes on the question, plus 74 votes on the top answer, and 56 on second answer; and 19 on third?  There's a lot of links to this question, too, and now they're all broken, making SE look like a community hostile to a popular question ontopic for the site it was on.
90634
I'm blocked from reviewing for some time, but I'm not blocked from editing. I would like to edit someone's question, but there is another suggested edit review pending. I can't approve it because of the review ban, but also I can't do any other edit as when I click "edit" it redirects me to approve the edit. Is that expected or this is a bug?
92727
asked me to report this (apparent) bug.  When he tried to protect  question someone (or something) stole the question's protection, which has since been missing:          The question shows no sign of having the protection removed, thus I believe it was abducted. I am sure justice will be done, and this poor question will receive the protection it deserves.     I recommend interrogating the  that was said to have announced this question to the world, I bet it would have some useful information.
117887
just wanted to report a problem with Data Explorer and realized I was banned from asking questions on meta. Probably because I .  Reading through the :   to prevent help vampires users who can't be bothered to form sentences users who don't do the most basic kinds of research themselves users who barely even explain what it is they are trying to do etc., etc. &hellip;   Nothing of this applies to my case. Here on meta, , so I think this should be reflected in the policy for question banning.
115916
Possible Duplicate:         Is this normal behavior in Stack Exchange sites that after just signing up one can edit not only his/her own comments / posts, but also others' comments / posts?  If so, then the Q&amp;A does not look safe to me. Imagine someone maliciously modifying a post and bringing bad reputation on a Q&amp;A member.  Can you check this and perhaps fix it?
72569
I'm a moderator on . I recently was surprised to find a question I had ‘helped with’ vanish without a trace from the site (including any references to my actions on it). Now, of course, questions can be deleted, but deletions are of interest to moderators, right?  As part of my search, I found the /admin/recently-self-deleted page and went there. The question was not listed even though, afterward, I determined that it had been self-deleted (at the time) two hours ago. It is now days since the deletion and the question is still not showing up, even though other questions have. This seems like a bug.  For any moderators/SE staff wishing to investigate:  and .  The question has no votes, no answers, and was deleted one day after it was posted.
61575
It's a shame to type out an entire question, press post and then:     Sorry, you are only allowed to ask 50 questions in a 30 day period   Could you put some sort of notice on the page itself before submitting it to let you know the question won't be going through?  Or perhaps tell me how many questions I've asked in the last 30 days if it's >0?  Edit  This is not a complaint or statement about the limit, just a request that the error handling be done in a slightly better way to save people a lot of time.