Today, I got some Spanish "Hot Network Questions", having read  it looks like a filter was supposed to be in place. I'm sure it's interesting but to my shame I do not know Spanish.  That question contains no English, it does contain some shell commands that are in English but certainly not text.  Please fine tune the filter or make these questions opt-in.
34445
As figured out in  localized SE sites must not be displayed in the HNQ's. But  actually is.        Has to be fixed I guess?
17828
Over the past week we've been busy reviewing our previous FAQ to directly address concerns over pronoun usage. We tried to anticipate likely questions, but… missed the mark a bit. Inspired by the Community's excellent curated one, we created a new combined FAQ and, after running it by the moderator team, we're happy to officially release it. Check it out in its new question:   We know some of you may still have questions or additional clarification on some points. We're happy to further improve the wording of either questions or answers or add answers to new questions. This post here is the place to talk through that. For ease of voting and responding, please limit each answer to one specific concern.  However, note that debating the core of the new rule ("please use stated pronouns") or the validity of people's identities or gender expressions is off-topic for this post, and we won't be entertaining those debates at this point and posts that aren't questions or requests for clarification may be deleted.  Please also note that the FAQ is very long as it is but the questions in it represent a broad spectrum of questions we've seen repeatedly over the last weeks. It doesn't cover many edge cases as an FAQ is not meant to cover/address every edge case that may come up - trying to preemptively legislate for everything hypothetically is a bad practice. Some of the bridges we will have to cross when we get to them, and the Community Management team will work with Moderators to deal with those as they come.  So, with all that said... Here's the place to post your requests for clarification/new questions.
19857
The  contains a link to the new code of conduct,  . As of 2018-08-07T05:27:38+00, . Also, I cannot find any other link to the conduct yet, neither in the help center, nor in the site navigation, which is a bummer, given that we're invited to read the new CoC:     Really, please, take a moment to read the new Code of Conduct now. It’s not long, it’s not wordy-and-legalese-y and in our long held tradition, we feel that it does a good job of assuming that the vast majority of folks that use our sites always have the best intentions at heart.    Is the code of conduct not yet published?  Edit: As mentioned in the comments,  announces the conduct and links to , so maybe it's not public yet?
86351
In the  I see:    Is that what the help is supposed to say and look like? Because it doesn't make sense to me.  As animuson points out in a comment, all of the highlighted example text is being shifted to the very left of each line. The entire page is broken.
49234
Here's this message from Sathya:    It usually shows like this in the rooms when you're in another chat room:    I edited the post to change a word repetition that sounded weird (Can you tell I'm bored and we don't have any flags in our queue?), and suddenly it changed the author to me:    What happened here?
103068
It would help everyone if we provided a mechanism that people could use to flag their post if English is language they are not comfortably fluent in. A lot of non-English speakers have to go to English forums for tech support and find it embarrassing to ask questions in broken Englis.   Worse, people reading a post often cannot tell if a badly-worded post results from a poor English or just laziness and sloppiness on the part of a native English speaker. Personally, I will take the time to puzzle out a poorly-worded post if I know the author is struggling with English, but if I think they're just lazy and careless I won't bother.   A simple check box could flag the author as a non-English speaker and allow everyone to adjust accordingly.   Edit01:  Some answers below have accused me of being 'elitist'. I'm not sure where they got the idea that I was sneering down at anyone because their abilities at either English or coding. That was not my intent.   When I said I would not bother with post that appeared to incoherent owing to laziness or carelessness, I am not being elitist. I'm giving priority in my time budget to people who are respectful enough of my time to spend the their time writing as clear a question as their grasp of English and coding allows. Why should I spend time answering a careless and slapdash post when I could spend that time helping posters who took more of their time writing their questions?   I am perfectly willing to burn a lot of time helping someone struggling to write code in their non-native language. I have a hard enough time coding myself in English that I can't even imagine what a dog's breakfast I would make of it if I had to code in, say, Korean.    I have seen many instances in which questions have been downvoted when a quick glance at the poster's profile gives a strong hint they are not native English speakers. I would like a system that would spare those posters from being downvoted or ignored by using an interface element that clearly communicates in a standardized way whether the poster natively speaks English or not.   I don't see what's elitist about that.    Edit02:   (original unedited) I'm talking about:     Hy, I have a childe view that put it   self over other brother views. The   problem is that when i touch it the   brother also reacts at the touch   event. How can I disable touch   propagation on the underlieng brother   views?   I'm not even exactly sure what he is describing. I can guess that he has a sibling view that extends over its siblings but I'm not sure. If I edited it, I might not end up asking the same question the poster intended.   To answer the question, I will either have to (1) first ask for more detail and then keep checking back until I get it or (2) try to answer what I think the question is and possibly mangle it then have to come back and edit my answer all the while risking a downvote because I answered the wrong question.   I will take the time and the risk of down vote if the poster is not a native English speaker (or is a child) and the confusing question represents their honest best effort. If they're just being lazy, I have other people to help.   I would like a mechanism that would help me decide how to allocate my time and would protect the non-English speaking posters from unjust downvotes.
62179
Super User got hit by another batch of spammers creating profiles. They've got accounts on other sites from what I've heard from other mods and from the comments here.  Last time it was streaming. Now it's  (as of december, looks like they're spamming scammy finance too). I have 160+ pages of users from that search, and a quick look suggests most of them are spammers. Comments from this post indicates it's network wide - and a quick check indicates Stack Overflow has a handful of these too, though not as many as we have.  While the powers at be have been taking action, both directly, and indirectly, it feels like between shared IPs and search, mods might be able to take a good chunk of these out if we can somehow have a way to delete accounts somewhat in bulk. You guys are awesome. But these... People keep doing it still, and it would be nice to see their works undone.  Unlike our streaming spammers, they've switched to phone numbers, presumably because Adam so kindly blocked links.    There's a few good suggestions at mitigating these - but ideally - I've heard from fellow mods that we want them gone.  They add to the broken window effect - which we can't do anything about due to sheer volume, and they probably poison our search engine results.  We can probably reduce the risk of oops by filtering by IPs (clearing everything on an IP lets me whack, 10, or so users at once, rather than clicking through 3-4 pages a user) and optionally selectively not deleting accounts that seem legit, we can probably clear out a bunch of these without really needing CM intervention. It does make it a little too easy, but these incidents, well kinda need a flamethrower's gentle warmth.  I'm cool with a no. I'm probably going through the usual channels in future. Would be nice to have something that lets mods deal with this effectively though.  Related:    - Actually goes into the impact of this  by a user - so clearly these are discoverable to an average user
89756
I can imagine that it is a little bit hard if you're not a native Japanese or Russian speaker to figure out where those new sites are and what they are about. Putting them under uncategorized is not what those new sites deserve.     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;   I understand from previous incidents  that  end up in this category for a while.    Can we make sure that new sites get properly categorized?
76302
I have some questions with answers, but none of the answers are acceptable (just wrong).  I'm sure there are a lot more people with the same problem.  Can you add a button to filter questions with answers but no accepted answer?  This way, people will see those questions and maybe try to offer a new perspective.
48851
In  the asker is apparently carrying out an Ant v. Make research smackdown.  To me this looks like spam, but seems harmless.  Should anything be done?  Is there a policy on canvassing the community in this way?  Is it allowed?  As an aside, it seems like the OP would get more views with some language tags, rather than what's on there now...
3679
I've seen questions edited to remove the language name from the title. Won't search engines - and folks using search engines - have an easier time finding them if these "tags" are kept as part of the title?
52343
There are some types of questions I don’t want to see, and so I . However, I've found that questions with these tags can still show up in Hot Network Questions.   For example, I've ignored the tag for the latest Star Wars movie on Scifi/Fantasy Stack Exchange, but questions for that movie from that site show up in Hot Network Questions.  Would it be possible to make it so that Hot Network Questions does not show questions that contain tags I am ignoring on the site that the question originates from?
53242
On Drupal Answers we just had a spam question (now deleted).  The question's title was, in its entirety:  http://premiumpureforskolinrev.com/metabo-garcinia/   I can't think of a good reason that any reasonable question, on any site in the network, could consist of only a URL.   I think such questions should be blocked before they are asked; can this be implemented?  And another one today (a couple of months later):    Over a year later and it's still going on:    Any chance this could be looked at?  Updating yet again as we just had a particularly disturbing one advertising something called "mutilation theatre". .  I don't think there's any question we do need this, hopefully someone from Stack Exchange will respond this time.
55921
Another meta question identified a bug that was marked as designed. To summarize the bug, the little number that appears next the Review link in the header shows an incorrect value most of the time.         I would like to propose that the feature be dropped. Honestly, I would prefer it be fixed, but the response to the question above gives me little faith that it will be. Half of the time, I click that little brown box and find out that I was lied to. There's nothing to review.  The little number no longer does the job it was created to do.        Oh sweet! Three things I can review!        Just kidding...
32009
just showed up on 's front page like this:    ... which makes no sense, because the question hasn't been modified since May 25th, and the person who edited it wasn't CatLord anyway:    Turns out what actually happened was that CatLord cast a fifth reopen vote to reopen the question.    So that stamp in the questions list should probably say this instead:     reopened 4m ago CatLord 10.7k   Or just:     reopened 4m ago
103878
I've noticed the text of the Hot Meta Posts box is not within its limits. I guess this would happen for any question with a word that's long enough:
18123
Recently, I was surfing on stackoverflow.com &amp; I have found one bug in Question filter.  I was looking under the java tag and yet I saw questions which were not tagged java    The incorrectly shown question was