I understand that a common feature like zooming can be complicated enough to be , but why can't the site banner zoom too? If the black top bar can be made screen-fit, and the fact that the reputation and badges disappear when zooming suggests that this particular bar is supported, then why can't the site banner be? There are plenty room for the buttons, and I think the HTML element is basic enough to make it easy. Before  After Zoom at 133%
123773
On MacBook, I like to zoom using gestures on my trackpad, as described here:     With a Multi-Touch trackpad or Magic Mouse, you can tap, swipe, pinch, or spread one or more fingers to perform useful actions.      (This is different than zooming with command++ or command+-.)  However, when I do this, many hover events don't work right. Like tag hover (and profile popup):        Here's a gif: .  As I zoom in more, the popup moves further away from where it should be.  I also noticed that it breaks SEDE graph hover; nothing happens when I hover over a point. (It should show the Y value.)  I am able to see the hover text (as in [description](example.com "hover text")) properly.
87912
The top bar is showing (again) the suggested edits count and 10K flags count, like it was before.  On Stack Overflow it looks like this: (that's the original color, same as in old top bar)        And on this very Meta site:        Same top bar. But different colors! Consistency broken.  I've just noticed the suggested edits count on Meta:        Black on black, I can see just a floating number - really confusing and out of any context.  In the name of Consistency, can we please have the same color on all sites?
64424
When I visit a site I haven't visited (while logged in) for a while, I see:  Welcome back! If you found this question useful, don't forget to vote both the question and the answers up.  That's often intended behavior. But today I visited  and was shown that banner even though the question and all its answers are locked. Voting arrows aren't even shown on any of the posts on that page. I believe that banner should be disabled on pages where there is no post that can be voted on by anyone.
80429
I just saw this ad on the side of Stack Overflow:    I currently work for stealth.travel.  It even shows it when I click on the link!    How is it possible that the system does not link 2 + 2 together and not show me the company I already work for in the banner ad? (not that I am looking for a new job, just curious how my own company showed up there)
123096
Last night, I updated my version of Google Chrome from 43.0.2357.81-1 to 43.0.2357.124-1. The most visible change is that the UI elements are way too large. Here's a comparison with Chrome (top), Firefox (center) and my system fonts (bottom); only Chrome is wrong:    This isn't a page zoom issue. Chrome thinks my zoom is at 100%. I can shrink the page elements by zooming out, but the UI is still too large.  I can fix this by launching Chrome with the --force-device-scale-factor flag. However, this isn't really a great fix; I'd have to change my launcher shortcuts and any programs that launch Chrome (e.g., web servers that auto-launch a browser, like Racket's). Using this flag also causes Chrome to start with a very small window size.  I checked in chrome://flags and didn't see anything interesting matching the grep for "scale."  If relevant, my desktop environment is Cinnamon on Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit. My screen resolution is 1920×1080, on a normal 14-inch (157 dpi) display.
5547
And if I click on it...        Looks like a CSS sprite issue...  I'm thinking that the image was recently changed, by looking at the name,   Currently on Chrome Version 33.0.1750.154 m. Firefox is fine though, with all zoom levels.  Steps to reproduce:  Either browse the site on a device with Retina display, or using Chrome follow those steps:   Change zoom level to 150% or more. Reload the page.
7050
When a post is deleted and the notification comes through, it scrolls over the inline flag bar:    The entire post also seems to capture clicks instead of letting them get to the flag bar. Looks like someone got a z-index wrong...
111836
I really love the way  works, but unfortunately it doesn't look very sharp on a , especially when juxtaposed with browser-rendered text. If you made the generated image twice its current size, it would circumvent this problem.  Could you please generate larger source images? Keeping the same width and height HTML attributes will mean that the image won't look any different for current users, so there's no chance of anything breaking.  It's a small difference, but quality is in the details!
53569
All the things mentioned above are working fine in Firefox but I'm having problem in Google Chrome. I'm posting below the screenshots of both the browsers displaying the same pages differently.   Firefox :  As I said, everything is normal in Firefox.   Google Chrome :  All the images are being displayed in a weird way. When I click on an image it redirects me to the page hosting the image, instead of zooming it. Also this error is displaying in the console.     All other sites are working just fine on Chrome. Google homepage, images and search results are the places I've encountered problems on.
37077
Hi my client has given me a load of images for the site I'm building for him, they are going in a Javascript Image Nivo Slider Banner at the top, the size of the banner is 720px x 200px but the images aren't.  I can crop the images, but I wonder if there is a way to resize them and change the proportion without destroying the quality, or due to the nature of how pixels work is this not possible?  I would like to be able to turn them into wide angle images and work from there.  I have Photoshop CS6 Ext.
77124
I'm talking about links or buttons at the bottom of the page or screen simply linking to the top of the website.  Is there any data on that? Are they used more frequently on long pages? What about mobile?  I know that , but I don't know if people actually know this and I also don't know if it works on Android and WP7.
33928
I just , which had been closed as  a duplicate of another.  I navigated away and went to visit the page later, it turns out, the Possible Duplicate banner wasn't removed automatically.        How come?
17071
This is probably easier to show than tell...   On the recent question , I see the following:    As you can see, the first five links render properly, but after that, they stop converting.  Unfortunately, this isn't obvious to the person writing the post, which I discovered when I went to edit the post to fix the "broken" links. In the edit window, it renders all of the links just fine:    I understand that this behavior is expected based on balpha's answer :        Links to questions on the same site are unlimited.   Links to other sites are limited to             a) 5 linked-to sites and     b) N questions per target site, where N is 200 on meta sites and 10 on non-metas (this is about the site that the post containing the link is posted on, not the site that is being linked to)         So if this rule is still going to stay in effect, please fix the edit view to also not automatically convert more than five linked-to sites to help people writing posts know that they need to manually title the links to the other questions.  That said, I'd prefer that (at least on MSE) this limitation be removed or raised. Even in the answer, balpha says:     The restrictions are currently as follows, but note that they do look a bit contrived, resulting from the fact that they have grown over time (from single site to cross-site, from "there are no subsites" to "facebook.SO", etc.), so it's not unlikely that we'll revisit them.   So, if it's not hurting performance, can we please increase the limit or remove it?
30336
Would it be possible to update the StackExchange button drop-down to include scalable vector graphics (SVG) favicons for each site?    I didn't notice any mention of this during the  and  phases.
69948
I would like to advertise my  on StackExchange. After spending 10 minutes creating a 220x250 image, I was told that new users can't link images. I have been around a while on SO, so I feel this is a little over-protective. I need at least 10 points. Can someone upvote me, please?
97129
When a link is shared in chat and it ends up in a specific position on the screen it is impossible to click it (without fiddling with the DOM).  As you can see in the printscreen above a link is in a post at the end of the line. However when I try to click the link the post options overlays the link (once I hover over the post):   Link to transcript:  Resolution: 1366 x 768 (laptop) Browser: Chrome v3300 (by the time you read this it will be at that version)
9773
On the meta posts that collect community ads (), I see ads in two sizes, 300x250px and 600x500px.  (Everything renders the same when ads are actually used on the sites, as you would expect.)  The requirements for ads include:     The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI.   I assume "high DPI" is a property of the software used to create the ads, or perhaps some "image export" property.  I'm not a graphics person; the ads I've made have usually started out as photos or similar art that I crop and scale to 300x250 using low-end software (Paintbrush on Mac, Paint on Windows, that kind of thing).  Should I be making them double size?  I haven't because nothing in my software says anything about "high DPI" so I assume it doesn't apply to me.  In a few months we'll be doing the next round of ads on my sites, and if I should be doing something different to make better images, I'd like to know.