I've noticed that a few sites seem to have slipped through the cracks for the new profile page. At first I thought it was just RPG.SE, but investigating further it looks like a number of them have been skipped over.  This includes, but is not limited to (though I think I got all of them) , , , , , , , , , , and .  This is a relatively small subset of the existing graduated sites. The , we were waiting for a new CSS framework to roll out (?), but it's been a while, and it looks like it's only these ones remaining.  When can these sites expect to see the new profile page?
36100
By January 2016, All communities have been updated     The design team has been rolling out design updates to sites as part of network-wide update to a new base css framework. The updates allow us to:   Use .svg sprites for retina displays  Fix layout bugs globally  More easily add new features to all of our sites in the future  Synthesize healthy, nutritive rations to feed employees from a small, battery-powered, toaster-sized device. Roll out the new (2015) Profile/Activity pages    As sites get updated, the designer who did the work posts on the local Meta, so the community knows the change is live, and can provide any relevant feedback.  They'll update this page too.  Done           (Apple)                                              On Deck  (I'm told this is a well-known "sports" metaphor.)  The order of this list is random (it is not the order in which the new design will be rolled out):   Looks like we are all done now...   Not Planned  Not scheduled for the redesign or the new user page:
61992
I'm asking this because the  site has been in public beta for 838 days and is still using the default beta-site theme which seems quite inappropriate for a site full of graphical designers.
112044
Update from Shog9:     Also affects Aviation, Cooking... Probably everything on the "not yet in progress" list here:  - I've passed this on to the devs. – Shog9     The  got busted in the last few hours.  It looks ugly and now needs to be scrolled, see below.  Other review pages (, ) are still fine. And the problem appears for me in both Chrome and Firefox -- and whether or not I'm logged in.        versus:
87586
See also:   Many of the newer sites have a certain degree of overlap. With the creation of Chem.SE, I noticed quite a few questions on Physics.SE which could have benefited from the chem community and vice versa. There also are a few that could benefit from bio.SE.. Now these questions don't warrant a migration. They can be double-posted, but this doesn't lead to a smooth experience. Even when cross-linked, changes to either post (new answers,new comments,etc) aren't effectively relayed to the other site, and the two questions are just that-- two, separate questions. One solution that came to my mind was a &quot;soft migration&quot; option for mods. By this, a question on site A stays on site A. But, it appears in the site B question list as well. Edits/answers should bump it. Basically, there will be a placeholder item in the questions list of site B. It shows the votes/views/answers of the post on site A, along with the tags (maybe stylized differently). These should be an unobtrusive way to quickly identify what the site is. The post should also be bumped whenever the post is bumped on Site A, and it should display the rep/time/etc of the bumping user as usual. Here's a quick mockup of what happens on the site B question list:  Without being obtrusive or in-your-face (stuff like [migrated] is sort of in-your-face), the post is elegantly shown to be on Physics.SE (well, if you know the icon, anyway). The tags are italicized to show that they link to a different site tags, and the &quot;bumping user&quot; (me) has his/her rep on that site shown. We can also add an indicator on the question on site A () that shows that it was soft-migrated. We can use tooltips as well on the icons to tell us why they're here. After all, half of SE documentation is in tooltips.  Now I know that these issues will probably be raised:  Rep: An avid user on Site B gets no Site B rep for giving a good answer on Site A. Frankly, I don't care about this to much, but others may.  Implementation: It may get complicated. Internally, I'd propose that none of the question data is copied, rather Site A pushes the vote/bump data whenever a vote/bump happens. The easiest way to then implement the soft merge would be to have a table of questions soft-merged &quot;to&quot; site B on site B itself, with columns for all the vote/etc data. The questions table should have an extra column for &quot;soft-migrated to&quot;--that way Site A can determine where to push new data to on every vote/bump. Now, all Site B has to do is take the JOIN of the questions table and the soft-merge table and display them in the new questions list (or any list, for that matter). With some extra formatting, maybe. Of course, I may be oversimplifying this and I don't really know what I'm talking about ;-)  Is there a need? : Yes, I would say so. Such questions can get awesome answers is both the communities participate, but our don't-cross-post-much policy deters this. In the end, this will result in better post quality, making the Internet better. Also, as area51 grows, we will see this problem more and more, and this will become more and more necessary.   Thoughts? Any better ideas? Waffles?  Update: Another use case for this would be to soft migrate all MSO  questions over to child metas, effectively solving
115253
After a sizeable amount of work we are releasing a new version of the mobile web site, this time focusing on the question and answer page. We have also fixed or implemented a minimal large part of the issues and requests mentioned in the . Changes Question and answer page  SVG icons for upvote, downvote, favorite, comment upvote white background color for legibility general styling issues with notices (they actually exist now) bounty link is now in question menu (next to flag)   Ask question page  general styling and sizing of element use of placeholders where appropriate instead of page text styling of error messages   Pop-ups  Popups are now inlined in the page instead of being sometimes floating and draggable Many overdue styling issues Close button is SVG Flag indicators are readable Buttons   Misc pages  404 page did not exist. Now it does. Login, logout are formatted Pre-ask and pre-answer warnings are now formatted  Bugfixes  made search magnifying glass bigger fixed language in user timeline so it's consistent with the desktop site added login link on top bar made topbar icons ever so slightly smaller  Restating the obvious: send your &lt;3 to  and   for the most excellent design! Feedback , bugs and suggestions while we move to the next iteration? Please mark bugs with
96537
According to , the network has 94 Q&amp;A sites:  But the new  disagrees:  My first guess was that the about page count included private betas, but according to  there are only two of them currently (ELL and Magento). Tim Stone has a  for the inconsistency:  There are 98 sites, two of which are private betas, and two of which are Meta Stack Overflow and StackApps, which are only main_site Q&amp;A sites in the technical sense. The about page should show 94 sites.  Whatever the reason, the counts shouldn't really be different, let's pick one and stick with it.
21723
Ding!  Hello, new feature!  I just noticed a new "Frequently Asked" section on the main page.  I'm guessing it's a test of a new feature, like the recent .  Seems cool so far.  But what is it populated with?  Common dupes?  Topics the viewing user asks about a lot?  Topics the viewing user searches for a lot?  For what it's worth, I'm getting a link to the  tag underneath it.
85310
Looking at most sites, I noticed something a bit weird. Stack Overflow has a different layout for their upper interface (which personally I find unique and easy to use).  On most of the sites I see:  | SE logo &amp; Sites dropdown | Inbox | Achievements | --- | Profile | Help | Searchbar | | Sitename | --- | Questions, Tags, Users, Badges, Unanswered | Ask Question |   On Stack Overflow:  | SO logo | Questions etc. | Searchbar | Profile | Achievements | Inbox | Help | Sites dropdown |   I have two questions,   Why does SO have such a format unlike the rest? Are there any other sites that have a unique upper interface?
65609
Slightly related:  Related:   My  currently syncs with my &quot;oldest profile&quot;, which is Physics.SE. Unfortunately, this means that the physics-specific blurb out there is shown to everyone. Also, whenever I create a new account, . I had filled in all my details and the one-line bio on Physics and used &quot;copy to all SE accounts&quot;. Then I later filled in the Physics-specific bio. It seems that the site the profile was all-site copied from is kept in memory, and new sites just copy from the current version of that site. I'd like a more intuitive and easy way to manage these profiles. I know profiles aren't a big deal, but currently I have a bunch of Physics-y stuff all over the place. And it's annoying.  Also, one important part of a bio is the expertise level, and that's obviously different for each site. Could we have a better way to manage these profile bios? One idea I could toss out is this: Have a centralized place to manage these bios. Maybe, just have a single text box with something like this: SE.com bio here   &lt;!-- Site:stackoverflow--&gt; &lt;!-- summary: SO summary here --&gt; SO bio here  &lt;!-- Site:physics--&gt; &lt;!-- summary: Phy summary here --&gt; Phy bio here . . . . &lt;!-- Site: alltherest --&gt; &lt;!-- summary: General summary for all the sites not listed above --&gt; Bio for all the sites not listed above  Whenever you save this, the relevant bios are sliced out and copied to each site. I feel that this will be way better than the &quot;copy to all sites&quot;.  Update: now that profile images can be uploaded independent of gravatar, we should be able to selectively sync these across sites as well.
35937
I just joined Sports, and I decided to take a look on Sports Meta. I clicked on my profile there. This is part of what I saw:     Yet the profile shouldn't indicate that it is, in theory. . .  This seems to be a bug.
48136
I really like the new sidebar. With the new top bar eliminating the &quot;Hot Questions&quot; area there, I think this is the perfect place for it. One-click access to time-wasting questions about topics I may or may not have an interest in. Seriously, it's a procrastinator's dream come true. The only suggestion I can add is to extend it. I assume the &quot;hot&quot; algorithm can spit out more than 12 questions, and since we now have a huge amount of room for it(without being restricted to a weird drop-down scrollbox), why not show more? If there's something else planned for that spot, disregard. At a minimum, the title could link to the , as ShaWizDowArd suggested in comments. I've been using SE for a couple years now, and I've never seen that page, so it would add visibility there.    Update: They added a link! Just noticed this, I'm pretty sure it wasn't there yesterday. When you click it, it loads 12 more. At the moment, the link disappears once clicked, so you can see a total of 24 here now. Not a link to the full list, but better:
58597
Today I'm seeing the wrong icon in the dropdowns only on chat.  The circled icons should be Writers, not Worldbuilding:    They're correct on the Q&amp;A sites:    I've only seen this for Writers so far.  If I get any inbox notifications or rep for other late-in-the-alphabet sites, I'll update.  As you can see in the screen shot from chat, Meta.SE is fine.  I suspect this has to do with the creation of new sites, indexing, and caching, but new-site is Tuesday and it's Thursday now, so that's some pretty heavy-duty caching if that's the cause.
89278
There was an update around the 17th or 18th. Now, I see that all of the sites have been updated as of the 25th. I know that there was a time when a weekly or every-two-week update cycle was planned, but I couldn't find any confirmation of this having been implemented. The  still says monthly, but there had been a delay of a few months at one point, so I'm not entirely sure that the FAQ is trustworthy on all points. Every other post that I've found about the Data Explorer is at least a few months old, and this appears to be a recent change.
41425
I've just asked six questions on , and one has been referred to this site.  Looking closer, I realized that this meta site is not just for Stack&nbsp;Overflow, as it seems from its name.  I think I'll need to transfer a couple of my questions over here.  Why are the two metas (the one for Stack&nbsp;Overflow and the one for all sites) merged into one instead of being separate?
89756
I can imagine that it is a little bit hard if you're not a native Japanese or Russian speaker to figure out where those new sites are and what they are about. Putting them under uncategorized is not what those new sites deserve.     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;   I understand from previous incidents  that  end up in this category for a while.    Can we make sure that new sites get properly categorized?
39443
I have had the same network-wide profile avatar for many years; it's a custom image which I installed nework-wide soon after I registered for Stack Overflow back in 2011. I still see that image e.g. on  and  but not, for instance, on this site, or e.g. on   (The example originally linked to my Unix &amp; Linux profile instead of Super User but I experimentally changed my profile back to the gravatar one there.)  I routinely update my profile presentation text every few months, and did so again a few days ago. Comments below seem to indicate that others who recently edited their profile are experiencing the same problem.  My preferred avatar is a Gravatar which is connected to my email address, which has always been the same (MD5 091f411d57db5be8298e057a32e5ad72). The replacement seems to be a generic identicon with a different MD5. I don't recall seeing this identicon as an option in my profile before:    You'll notice that the gravatar is still visible as an option, but I can find no way to replace it on all sites in one go. I switched back to the gravatar one on Unix &amp; Linux and noticed that the help next to the "Save" button says     Your profile will be updated on all public communities.   but alas, that did not in fact happen. Do I really have to go over 170+ member sites and manually select my gravatar on each?
41175
Odd CSS link colors have appeared again on at least some of the sites without the CSS update, specifically including Science Fiction &amp; Fantasy and Mi Yodeya, and likely others.  User profile pages also have broken layouts.  I believe it's related to this previous bug report:    This time, Seasoned Advice is not affected as they've had the CSS redone.