I've checked the migration stats pages on the sites I have access to them  and  and the stats don't reflect the actual migrations at all. It seems to be having trouble attributing the migrations to the sites they came from or were sent to.  Here's the ELL page:    As you can see, there are 190 migrations that apparently come out of thin air (most of them are from ELU). The system is able to correctly attribute a few from ELU and one from French. Similarly, in the away column, the two that were migrated away don't note where they were migrated to. In this case, they were both migrated to ELU.   A few months ago we noticed an . I don't think this is related because these questions aren't from Meta to Main site, they are between sites.
25447
I was just looking at the statistics for migrated questions in the  mod tools, and noticed this oddity:    The actual statistics, as visible to any 10k+ SFF user , are: 6 migrated to Worldbuilding, 2 to Literature, 2 to SFF meta, 1 to Movies &amp; TV, 1 to Writers, and 1 to Aviation.  Why is one of the meta migrations showing up with a blank icon rather than with the other?  Both migrated questions were closed as duplicates on meta. Both were migrated by 5 community members without mod involvement. One of the stubs on main has since been deleted, but so have the stubs for some of the other migrated questions. I can't think of anything to explain this discrepancy.
106540
I was Active in Arabic SE before it was closed days ago. Though I still see messages and achievements in my inbox that's related to it.  In deleted questions, all go hidden and that's good. Why not doing the same for Closed sites?    because this, the Android app is getting crash at every time I check inbox or achievements.
12414
A few minutes ago, when I viewed profile pages on my phone, the tabs were all in Portuguese:   On the mobile interface:   On the full site     But it didn't happen on my desktop, and now it's back to normal.  Other users report that the site is normal, but  says it's still happening, so I've decided to post this bug report even though it seems to be working for me at the moment.   Perhaps it's some sort of intermittent problem.  I'm posting this on Meta.SE, since it seemed to happen on both Japanese.SE and ELL.SE, so it doesn't seem to be specific to a particular site.
82338
There was a spurious edit to the  tag that I declined, but also noticed that the original  wiki was copy/pasted verbatim from the .  This is a  project, but the website itself doesnt' appear to be (based on the  page).  In this case, is this considered an appropriate use of information (since it is after all a open-source project, and the text from the main page of the website undoubtedly is not only an excellent description but is useful for the curl group as well)?  Or is this something that isn't technically appropriate and should be rewritten (not by me, as I have no clue what it should say).
92702
According to ,  was removed from the list of migration flag sites. As a normal user, what is the best way for me to indicate a question probably needs to be migrated to Programmers.SE? Additionally, it seems redundant to have the list of topics before the list of SE sites to migrate to, especially when both pages suggest  as a desination. Maybe superuser should be removed from the list of 5 sister sites given that you can flag it as a general hardware/software question on the previous page? It seems silly that the list is limited to the top 5 sites when there are a lot more  that questions might need to be migrated to. For reference, the question in question was this one:
97239
OK, here's the situation. Someone posted an  on SO.  There were 2 main answers.   One was stock "you can use this standard data structure - see details on Wiki". Basically, a priority queue.  One was mine, which had a somewhat-original (at least, I don't recall ever reading an official moniker for it) data structure. Actually, two of them, one for each possible domain of data distribution.    BOTH algorithms were faster on average (mods AND look-ups) than the standard Priority Queue when applied to that user's problem domain. The proof, aside from fairly simple O(n) analysis, is that as of today, the OP commented on my post that my data structure was the best he could use and accepted my answer. However, at the time of posting, a couple of people down-voted it initially, with incorrect excuses like "algorithm does not work" (based on incorrectly reading my answer), "Wiki data structure is better" (without reading my O(n) analysis or comprehending it). First down-vote was from a competing Wiki question. Then it seemed to be lemming-like down-voting, including at least 2 serial down-voters that were since cleansed by SO team as per my report.   So, since most of the current down-votes if not all are based on people being obviously technically wrong as acknowledged by original poster, is there some sort of appeals process on SO whereby a technically competent moderator/superuser can review the Q, determine whether the people who down-voted also posted incorrect comments as reasons for down-voting, and fix this?  Please note that this is mostly a question of fairness - at my rep level, the current "-6" rep from the Q are not really that big of a deal (and the main problem was the opportunity cost of people not voting my A up when the thread was active due to seeing negative score and a long thread of comment criticisms - which I can't get back anymore since the thread is no longer active).  And yeah, I'm whining :) But it was a behavior of a couple of people that was grossly unfair and totally contrary to the spirit of SO.
70154
Didn't find any talk of this so my curiosity got the best of me.  How do migrations handle favorited questions? My guess would be the favorite link would stay on the original site to the closed migrated question and I would assume any favorite marks would be reset on the site migrated to.  This isn't really that important, but just curious what happens.
63862
i've launch a website on wednesday (9 August)  There's already in 4 days    12,000 viewed pages 1,400 visits 20 to 25 backlincks a sitemap.xml (130 URL) english language / french language - url like that "/en/"  "/fr/"   BUT, i'm still not referrenced by google  In the google webmaster i have  0 backlinks 130 in sitemap, 0 URL referrenced on google  For a smaller website, i remember that i took me less to appear on google with less visits.  My url is:  for english and juste replace /en/ by /fr/ to access it in french.  What's causing this ? Is there an explanation ? Thanks for your help  (ps, i've already checked robots.txt)
122985
I've seen a number of cases when questions have been migrated from one site to another (SO--&gt;SF, SO--&gt;SU etc). If the original asker doesn't have an account on the site to which the question has been migrated, he basically loses track of the question.  This is especially true of questions that are migrated to SU which still needs a password having to do with . I suggest that once you have an account on one of the sites, you should also have an account in each of the sister sites so that you can easily keep track of all your questions that have been migrated. Edit:  I know you can link the accounts.  I just think this should be automatic in order to reduce friction.
96537
According to , the network has 94 Q&amp;A sites:  But the new  disagrees:  My first guess was that the about page count included private betas, but according to  there are only two of them currently (ELL and Magento). Tim Stone has a  for the inconsistency:  There are 98 sites, two of which are private betas, and two of which are Meta Stack Overflow and StackApps, which are only main_site Q&amp;A sites in the technical sense. The about page should show 94 sites.  Whatever the reason, the counts shouldn't really be different, let's pick one and stick with it.
70919
I noticed that the  was deleted.   When the  came out, I tried to look for my old answer as well as others for comparison.  Why not just mark the old one superseded by [insert link]?  Note: I don't care about lost rep. There were a lot of useful links in answers and comments there (and some less-than-useful ones too).     Old CoC FAQ may be available  and . Source: (, ).
74653
I migrated  over .  When it got there, it had lost . I’m confident that the comment wasn’t deleted by a moderator on Stats since it was gone immediately after the question arrived on that site.  This looks like a bug, no?
118873
I attach a screenshot of the problem. Just happened when I entered my activity to see my progress.    I have not been able to reproduce it again in Spanish but this is the same browser showing the same page in Meta:    The thing is that this happens when you have not yet set the tracking for the next achievement or privilege, once set I can't see this layout again.
46426
There's a sad little loophole in the suspension/question-block system: migrations.  Example: Let's say you've been suspended on MSO, but you really, really want to post a question here now. All you need to do is:   Go to any other site and ask your question.  Chances are good that a moderator there will automatically migrate it here. If not, request it. Success! Your question is now on MSO.   Can this be fixed? The best approach, imo, is to check if the user already has an account at the destination, and if they do, if they're allowed to post.
6488
When a question is migrated, is the reputation earned by its author on the original site subtracted from the author's total? What about votes? Badges? Do the same rules apply to the question's answers?
11896
I have just answered a question on .  The nature of this error means that it requires DBA access to diagnose and resolve.  So I think it is more suited to ServerFault, and voted to close it accordingly.    Except that I wasn't offered the choice of selecting a more approprate Trilogy site.  I think the reason for this is that the question was .  But it was migrated by an SF moderator, Chopper3, and no other voters.  By  Chopper is "no Oracle expert", and I think he has made an error here.    I'm not launching an ad hominem attack, and I'm fine with moderators having super powers.   I just think that we ought to be able to bounce migrated questions back, even if the previous migration was ordained by a moderator.    @AdamDavies suggests I post a comment on the original site.  That indeed was the first thing which occurred to me.  However, comment is not an option. I don't know whether this is  a reputation thang (I don't use SF much) or because the question was closed by a mod.  I have also flagged the question with the SF moderators, so we'll see.
14314
I had a  that was migrated to Area 51 on 23rd January, after receiving 3 upvotes here. However, I suddenly lost the 15 rep from the upvotes today(almost a month later).     If I understand this  correctly, then that is not supposed to happen and rep gained on the original site is to be retained on the original site. Is this correct ?  What happened to my rep ?