Edit 1: I'm sorry, but the answers provided in the  do not answer this question.   To clarify: I'm not asking how to whitelist a domain, I'm asking WHY a domain is blacklisted - seemingly without reason - in the first place when no explicit nor mature content can be found on it. It's imperative that the website can be acccessed on any iOS device, even if web content restrictions are in place, with no further user intervention.  EDIT 2: I've found that not all pages on our domain are blocked by this setting, so it seems iOS blocks a page based on specific content (words, images, etc.), maybe even certain HTML. Would be grand to know what exactly triggers the block.  EDIT 3: it's definitely the content. Once I remove all the main content from our website and just leave the header, footer, HTML tags, scripts etc. in tact, the website is accessible even with "Limit Adult Content" setting turned on. I've scoured the content but can't fathom what exactly causes this. The website text is in German (the HTML lang tag is set accordingly) and there's imo literally nothing that could be seen as adult content. Guess we'll just have to get in touch with Apple to figure this one out. Thanks though!    Original question:  I just launched a new website for a client. The website is aimed at teenagers from 12-14 and doesn't contain any explicit content whatsoever.   If web page content restriction are turned on in iOS, the website cannot be accessed with Safari and the following message is displayed instead:  You cannot browse this page at   "domain.com" because it is restricted   Why does this happen and what can we do about it? This makes no sense. The domain name in question is brand new, hasn't been used before and isn't on any blacklists as far as I can tell.  Any help is appreciated, we really need to get this website rated appropriately.
123980
I don't add these web sites to the restricted list. Is the iPhone sending every page I visit to Apple? Random surfing will encounter a random  restricted site. In this case it renders this app broken because the 'allow' link doesn't work. Setting is currently set to limit adult content which allows me to use a white list and blacklist. I never added this site to blacklist. I only blacklist 3 sites.     How does iOS know that a website is restricted? Does it send it every page I visit to Apple?   How does iOS know if a website is restricted? Does it send it every page I visit to Apple?   See this is the BS I'm talking about:    iOS 10.1.1
34119
I'm in kind of a tight spot right now. I wanted to know if someone has seen a HTML, or PHP web ssh client as both my company and school block everything besides port 80. I'm a control freak when it comes to my servers so yah. I have found things like gateone but here's specifically my issue.  I have access via port 80. I host websites on port 80 if my server. I can run PHP scripts via Apache. I cannot visit sites via encryption. I cannot change the ssh port (trust me, I've tried) I have root access to the server.  Any help or Ideas would be appreciated. If worse comes to worse, I can write my own in PHP.
38438
Following , I would like to know what exactly it means for a tag to be marked as blocked (formerly blacklisted) on a Stack Exchange site.  Does it mean I can't use that tag on my question? What are the reasons for blocking a tag? Who can block tags? Why am I being prompted to remove a tag from a question I'm editing?
18251
So we have many issues with the sub-domain that we are using with the marketing cloud. One of them is: If we want to reply to the emails from Outlook, we get an error message that says:     Undelivarable and the content is: reply-fecc157376670c7c-2139_HTML-104564539-100025066-1 wasn't found at hello.ourSubdomain.com.     Also every time a client replies to one of our emails, @hello.ourSubdomain.com is getting appended at the end of their actual email address.  We did whitelist our IP address and this was resolved for 2 days. But later, we started getting the same errors.
104314
I do some minor programming and web work for a local community college. Work that includes maintaining a very large and soul destroying website that consists of a hodge podge of VBScript, javascript, Dreamweaver generated cruft and a collection of add-ons that various conmen have convinced them to buy over the years.   A few days ago I got a call "The website is locking up for people using Safari!" Okay, step one download Safari(v3.1.2), step two surf to the site. Everything appears to work fine.  Long story short I finally isolated the problem and it relates to Safari's back button. The website uses a fancy-pants javascript menu that works in every browser I've tried including Safari, the first time around. But in Safari if you follow a link off the page and then hit the back button the menu no longer works.  I made a pared down webpage to illustrate the principle.  &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"&gt; &lt;html&gt; &lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;Safari Back Button Test&lt;/title&gt; &lt;meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt; &lt;/head&gt; &lt;body onload="alert('Hello');"&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.codinghorror.com"&gt;Coding Horror&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt;   Load the page and you see the alert box. Then follow the link off the page and hit the back button. In IE and Firefox you see the alert box again, in Safari you do not.  After a vigorous googling I've discovered others with similar problems but no really satisfactory answers. So my question is how can I make my pages work the same way in Safari after the user hits the back button as they do in other browsers?  If this is a stupid question please be gentle, javascript is somewhat new to me.
45305
According to Google Webmaster guideline "Hidden text" is not acceptable. Which means I do have a dov containing some good amount of title or paragraph with link or images if I make it display:none in my CSS, it is against Google crawl policy (thats how it seems).  My question is if I use it within media queries how Google will react? I mean   @media handheld, only screen and (max-width: 767px) {     body {     }     .mobile-friendly{ display:none;} }   for fluid website development we often have to hide certain contents to make the site mobile friendly. Rather than making css for each browser we now code css within same file and define browser behaviour using media queries.  So is google take any action against it?  --Additional Piont/Question Thanks @John Conde; You are right. Google still is not taking much action against Hidden text. But still pro SEO suggest not to use it. In Example using logo within tag on wordpress and text-indenting them to -9999px ... there are more of the tricks involved.  As I am trying to play safe; this is annoying me a lot.    You see they clearly mention CSS display properties. They didn't explain about these media query exception! As I am trying to be over sure and as Google didn't mentioned anything about it I'm still confused on this question. Any Advice?    Thanks for the edits by editors. I'm new here sorry for any inconvenience.  Why you may require to hide few contents? The blog I'm desiring is responsive. I want to let my visitors know about it's mobile friendly design. I have placed few mobile icons for better user experience and usability assurance. But I want them visible only on desktop browser not on mobile. Because if they are already browsing from mobile they don't needed to be notify. Infact I can rather tell them this site can be used as web apps while they are on mobile.
109096
.  A diamond moderator rolled back a question to a state where it had .  This effectively recreated the tag, despite it being blacklisted.  This should not happen, and is .
74156
The search results on  are blocked because of:     [blocked] The page at  ran   insecure content from .   I am using Chrome.
48142
A user may not post a  link if the user doesn't also post some code with it.  I recently learned that .  Why isn't this ban in place with all the other sites similar to JS/PHPFiddle, like , , , ,  etc.?
97704
I just visited  and for me it shows no results. Has something broken?   The problem occurs for me , but oddly not on some other sites I've tried, such as  or .   I have tried pressing Ctrl+F5 many times, but as yet no success in solving this. This has now been broken for days, leading me to believe that caching is not the culprit.  I've since noticed that the problem goes away if I add some tags as favourites (e.g. ). But I prefer to have no favourite tags, so the problem remains for me. What's odd is that I don't use favourite tags anywhere on the network, so the fact that the ServerFault and Programmers tab works for me is a mystery.
58768
I work behind an really annoying firewall, and I just want the net admin to add all the SE websites to the whitelist. Right now I've lost access to Stack Overflow's authentication, but not Meta's... so I have to come here before I log in there.  It's driving me nuts. Basically I just want to add an exclusion rule for all SE domains; not only the website domains, but also the content domains such as gravatar.com, quantserve.com, the domain that holds static content, etc...
63345
I've seen posts pop up every once in a while on virus coding, and I went to flag them, but I didn't see a category under which to do so. After further investigation, I've had no luck finding rules against it, so I presume this means that there are no rules against it (correct me if i'm wrong). So my question is, why is this allowed, is it even legal, and should we allow it?
74633
I have a friend who purchased a domain name recently that he found out (after buying it) is apparently blocked by many corporate firewalls or proxies b/c it's been tagged as porn by the blacklist db they're using.    Are there any common agencies he can appeal to in order to get the domain name off the black lists?  It's not just one corporation, either, he's looking at marketing a subscription-based service to a certain industry, so any contacting a particular firewall/proxy admin and have them manually update the blacklist won't scale well.  Thanks in advance. Paul
109536
I was doing a duplicate content search on the web for our site content and found that someone has downloaded/mirrored our entire website and is hosting it on a subdomain of their own main domain. When I check the WHOIS database, no details of the user are available.  Why do people do this when it is clearly a copyright infringement - is it an SEO thing?  What is the best way of dealing with these individuals?
19960
I'm running a website which is acting extremely strange.   At the time of writing, this link works: http://www.example.com This link doesn't: http://example.com  But it does work if you copy/paste it and run it in Incognito... This link (after ignoring a warning) serves a totally unrelated and unknown website: https://example.com    I have no idea how to debug this issue. I have contacted the hosting and domain company to investigate the issue. How is the last issue even possible?
112918
I just reached 10k on SO yesterday. Today, when I was going to inspect a spam question, I saw this:    I expected that it should be hidden, presenting me with a link to the revision history, but it wasn't. I'm not a diamond mod, so that's too explicit to show me the content directly.  I switched to desktop view, and saw the question hidden as expected:    However, spam and rude/abusive answers are properly hidden on mobile web:    Related:   This well indicates that a similar issue occurred when masking was first done for answers. Masking for questions wasn't implemented on the full site until later, so it appears to be a very similar case. Also, it's  if you search for [mobile-web] [spam].
72337
I've got a domain that I apparently forgot to set a preferred domain for, so I just tried to do it. Webmaster Tools instead popped up a little box:     Part of the process of setting a preferred domain is to verify that you own http://www.example.com/. Please verify http://www.example.com/.   I'm running into some problems following these instructions:   As far as I can tell I already did verify sometime in the past. There's a TXT DNS record with the gibberish Google tells you to set for it that I couldn't have come up with myself. …and nothing is telling me this information is bad. So let's assume the site is somehow not actually verified. All  instructions start with "click the Manage Site button next to the site you want, and then click Verify this site." That button doesn't even exist on my screens. (It presumably goes away when you successfully verify?) Those instructions were all updated pretty recently, and the DNS one in particular just a couple weeks ago so it seems a bit unlikely they're inaccurate.   I am not using Apps, and won't be, so can't try out the verification .   Note that I also have another domain that I have not done any verification for which is showing the same behavior(no such button, being told to verify when it seems impossible etc.) so something appears to just be broken.  I already have a no-www process in place server-side, so we can skip that. I'm just trying to get the box checked off in GWT.  If I don't get any resolution, I'll eventually scrap the TXT record and see if the site gets un-verified(or whatever since it thinks it isn't), and see if I can just restart the process.  It's not urgent so I'm just trying to figure out if I've gone blind to something or what. Did the button move?