For example, if I want to talk about a team's chances of winning a competition, which of these would be correct?  What do I say?     United have the best chance of winning.   United has the best chance of winning.   The team is made up of many players so I think it should be plural; therefore, I think have sounds correct. But someone told me it should be has as the team is just one thing.
1135
I'd say Microsoft have a way of bending the rules and I know that McLaren have won the championship. While this sounds strange, I believe it is correct English (sorry, I'm not native).   But when it's a small company, would you still use it this way? Is a company always plural, or are small companies singular? I.e., would you say Bakery Johnson makes fine bread or Bakery Johnson make fine bread? Is it My book seller, Woody's, have moved or is it has moved?
24910
I know the usage of     This is a new car.   This is singular.     These are some books for you.   These is plural.  Shall we use   There exists some people who agree with me. There exist some people who agree with me.   Which one is the correct usage and why?
80449
How do you know when to use singular or plural nouns if they're used as adjectives?  i.e.     32-bit computer vs 32-bits computer?      teacher union vs teachers union?      wedding planner vs weddings planner?      sport medicine vs sports medicine?      student council vs students council?   Which one is correct?
58378
In a question like this one, for example,      Who have/has come?    Is the word "who" singular or plural? Or is it both plural and singular?   I have heard it’s plural. Please correct me if I am wrong.
56038
Do native speakers of English use verbs in the plural form when speaking about one company? I've come across such use by supposed natives.   Don't you think that it is ungrammatical to use verbs in plural,mentioning one company? Maybe when you speak about one company you imply that it is a team or staff or a group of thousands people working in one place.     Fujitsu send newsletter to all subscribers once a month.    I've made up the above example. It is not a quote.
31435
In order to convey excitement to being a part of a team, which one would you use?     I’m so looking forward to be a part of [team name] that I can barely sleep.   or     I’m so looking forward to being a part of [team name] that I can barely sleep.   Is any of these correct? If not, what would be the proper way of conveying this?
70087
What kind of verb, singular or plural, goes with phrases like "a record of [singular or plural noun]", "the use of", "the time of"? Does the choice depend on the following nouns (a record of nouns) or on the 'first' nouns (record, use, time)? Or do these phrases obey the rule of proximity (as does "a variety of")?  I have found different example sentences on the internet (source: newspapers or magazines) with different uses. What is correct?  Examples:   there were a record of other issues; there were a record of 28,000 runners; there was a record of these statements.
69578
I'm trying to find out whether I should use a singular or plural verb when there are multiple gerunds as the subject of the sentence. For example:  Running the correct course and keeping a steady pace are/is necessary in order to win.  With either one of these by itself, &quot;is&quot; would be correct:  Running the correct course is necessary in order to win. Keeping a steady pace is necessary in  order to win.  With both gerunds combined, I can't seem to figure out whether the verb should stay singular since each phrase is singular, or if it should become plural since there are two connected by &quot;and&quot;. If we just treat the gerunds as regular nouns, then obviously it would become &quot;are&quot;, but I'm not sure if gerunds have the exact same rules as regular nouns. I know that if the sentence was:  Running the correct course and keeping a steady pace are both necessary.  That &quot;are&quot; would be correct, but without the &quot;both&quot; it sounds incorrect to me. Does anyone know the official rule here?
11411
Should the phrase be "one or more is...", or "one or more are..."?
104850
If asking a question or giving instruction towards a group of objects where the number is unknown (and possibly could be one) what is the correct way to phrase the sentence? Which of the following sentences are more correct:     Has there been any studies regarding this and if so what has been the   conclusion?   OR     Has there been any studies regarding this and if so what have been the   conclusions?
30722
In English we say an event has "long odds" if it is unlikely to happen, and "short odds" for the opposite.  The question is why?  Best I have been able to get from people:   Long over even (if you are betting then the odds you get from the house are larger then for an even bet) Long as in something being a long way away and harder to hit/achieve/get to.
15510
In the construction "one of the [plural noun] who ...", should the verb agree with "one" or "[plural noun]"?   For example, which of the two following sentences is grammatically correct? Or are both acceptable?        She was one of the several children who was sold at the auction    She was one of the several children who were sold at the auction.
121407
How does the subject-verb agreement work when a singular noun describes a plural one? Of the following, which sentence is righter?  The computers is a good choice. The computers are a good choice.  Is there a rule about these types of formations? Please explain.
45728
I'm confused by the use of plural and singular when Every is use. Which of the following sentences is correct?    Every business has its own unique set of challenges, resulting in a different approach even if they have the same goals. Every businesses have their own unique set of challenges, resulting in different approaches even if they have the same goals.
21030
When speaking of a group of people and referring to a body part of which there is only one (e.g. head, nose, mouth, etc.), do we use the singular or plural form? Which of the following is correct, or are both possible?  Our stomach is full.  Our stomachs are full.
105595
I'm posting this question to settle a debate.  Is the sentence, "If there are three of an unparalleled thing, is any of them truly unparalleled?" correct? The sentence throws me off because the first clause has a plural subject, but the second clause has a singular subject. My personal preference would be to make the subjects in both clauses plural. I.e. "If there are three of an unparalleled thing, are any of them truly unparalleled?"  On the other hand, adding "one" sounds okay too. I.e. "If there are three of an unparalleled thing, is any one of them truly unparalleled?" The addition of "one" lessens the ambiguity over whether the subject is singular or not.
74467
I used the book "Grammar and Style" and one example confused me:      He was the better/ best of two players.    The answer was the better but learners wonder how is it true since we use best after the definite article, the.   Was the answer given above correct?