Its a pretty self contained question.  I know its not the votes for a question, and not the total views. Is it views in a certain time period?  The number I'm talking about is circled in the below image.
121635
To the left side of questions listed under Hot questions, I see a number.      What is that number? I would think it is the number of users who seen the question, but it's not the same number I see in the Q&amp;A site.
59153
I have been browsing through the most upvoted questions on Stack Overflow and noticed there is a bug in the number of upvotes for the most popular one:    At least on the Android app instead of 11k only 1.1k are displayed.
110324
Timeline can be view by anyone, so vote details in timeline is a little bit contradict with      1000       Show total up and down vote   counts   in , but I hope this not to be changed :-)  For example  and timeline is , also a screen shot below.    PS:I mean there is a work-around in timeline view to see up/down details without having 1000 reps. :-)
47035
I found  (only visible to 10k+ users on SFF, sorry) which had been deleted from review some hours ago but also flagged for conversion to a comment. I undeleted it and converted it to a comment (which of course re-deletes the answer), only to see that the post claimed to have been "deleted from review just now" by the same list of users as before.  Here's a screenshot of the timeline:    And here's one of what the post itself looks like now:    It was actually deleted from review 3 hours ago and then undeleted and redeleted by me 36 minutes ago, but to a casual observer it looks like it was deleted from review 36 minutes ago.  I'm posting this as a  report because it's technically showing incorrect information, but I'd be perfectly happy to be told it's actually a new feature. In fact, I've often found it annoying that when a whole bunch of users have voted to delete a post and then I convert it to a comment, their votes don't show up and it looks like I've acted unilaterally to remove it. This kind of remedies that.
22580
I googled .  Like (almost) always, SE was first.  However, they actually answered my question in a fancy box!    I read it, and clicked the link because I needed to know how many upvotes the answer got. It got 2 upvotes and is near the bottom, since there are many answers to this question.  The top (selected) answer has 317, and is also the description being pulled for the second top listing, as shown above.  Here is the question:   I would think this should be fixed, but maybe it is intentional, as the shown answer DOES agree with the top answer, and is short enough to fit properly.
34042
Is there any way to view the number of users online at any given time (or even an approximation)?  This could be really useful to provide an indication of whether your question is likely to get answered any time soon.  It could also provide a bit of an indication for why your question is getting very low views - if there are only a few users online, then that could be the reason for little interest in a question, whereas if there are lots of users online and the question still doesn't garner many views, then maybe it needs to be rephrased or something.  I know that this can't be used definitively, but it could be used as a rough guide, and could also just be an item of interest.  Perhaps it could show the number of users that have been seen in the past 5 / 10 minutes? (Shouldn't be too hard, since each user page already shows the last time that they were seen).
30712
I have always wondered, do SO/SE employees/admins have an ability to see who downvoted them? For example, I can see my own downvoted questions on .  Does this interface look like it does to me, or to everyone else, when logged in as an admin? And if it's not built-in to the interface, do those who are developers ever look it up in the DB?  If not, why are you lying? (that's a joke.)  I ask this because I think anonymous downvotes save us from taking the downvote personally.  Even at our best, sometimes it's human nature if we know the source of criticism, and I don't want anyone to take a downvote that I make personally.  And no, I'm not making any assumptions or guesses as to why one might do this, beyond that desire  to know why they were downvoted.  Simply wondering if it exists.
67251
Trying to , I'm getting questions with more views than asked for.  For example, I tried to search for views:1..5 on CrossValidated, but I'm getting results with more views:    But the  actually has 117 views at the time of writing.
111424
I was thinking about some of the things said in  and how so many questions seem surmountable. You've already given us a way to break down that queue into smaller chunks by , but we have no idea if the section we're trying to "clean up" is 3 posts or 30,000.  Could you add a number somewhere to the Review screen showing us how many posts there are to review in our filtered Review Queue?  (Ideally, a date range filter option would be nice too, to allow us to further break down the queue into manageable sizes for a single person to clear on their own)  Edit: Based on the success and some of the comments on  when the Close Vote Queue was temporarily reduced in size and a post created to list the top Tags and Count of posts, I think this would help increase participation of reviewers in the Close Vote Queue a lot.
110477
There has been a trend now two persons downvote it then it goes on like that. So let there be down voting but do not display the downvotes till the user votes on it. Else the user reads it with an impression that the question is not good.  Am I missing something?
118837
I have an answer that I'm certain is technically correct. However, it continues to be downvoted. The answer has already been noted in comments on other answers to be better. It goes more in-depth than the others, yet it continues to be downvoted.  The already upvoted answers were nowhere close initially, and I had already commented on them to say why it is wrong...  Isn't there a limit for that? Shouldn't something be catching this?
58019
Very funny: on the stats page for 'suggested edits', it says there is 1 user with 1 review so far today. However, the counter for 'reviews today' says there are 11. Similar issues exist in other review queues of other Stack Exchange sites, e.g. for first posts. . Checkout these stats to see it at work.  I would not be surprised if the counter has not been reset last night at the start of a new day ... smells like a bug (or yet another undocumented feature ...).
114218
Today I came across an OBVIOUSLY good answer in /review. It had 7 upvotes, contained lists, paragraphs of explanation, and well-applied sample code. It was also moderately long. How does a question like this get flagged for review? I don't really know how the algorithm works.   If this is low-quality then I feel bad about all of my answers.  Here's a  if you care to see it in context. It's not really a huge problem (as Bart's comment emphasizes), but this seems like an extreme outlier in every measurable aspect.
77125
I'm taking a look at  (now removed), which all seem to be pretty much the same.  Should any be downvoted/flagged, and if so, which ones?
80744
I just stumbled across this when trying to .  I'd argue a site like Stack Overflow is absolutely the best place for these kinds of questions, somewhere where people can give their opinions and experiences for other people to easily and quickly see at a glance, and view the best rated ones.  When searching that exact question on Google, the sites I came up with were just blogs, the opinion of a single person. Personally I'd value the opinion of an entire community, especially this community, much higher than that.
34387
I just noticed that the question:  doesn't appear in the "active" list.  If this list were based purely on last modified time, it would be there; so I am assuming that a question will no longer appear in the active questions list at a certain number of downvotes.  Just out of curiosity, is the exact number of downvotes that it takes to kick a question off the active list publicly available or are the details of this functionality purposefully undisclosed?  (or is there another reason that invalidates my initial assumption of it being based on downvotes?)
13968
I know Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky are the owners or creators because I came by the site from reading their blogs.  Who else works for Stack Overflow in here?  Does Jon Skeet? There's also a fair number of 100k+ users now.  The answers from them are quite informative. It seems that to get that many points in such a short amount of time (the site's only been online for 2-3 years?), you would need to be spending quite a lot of time, regularly on here, so either they   Have a ton of spare time either at work or outside of work Are unemployed (seems unlikely given their breadth of knowledge) Work for Stack Overflow and their job is partially to post answers.   These guys seem too knowledgeable so reason 1 or reason 2 seem unlikely, so I suspect reason 3.