console.log(undefined !== null);//true console.log(undefined == null);//true     I can't undestand why undefined !==null,but i know undefined == null,because The language specification :     If x is null and y is undefined, return true
1275
I'm using  to go through JavaScript, and it's returning many suggestions to replace == (two equals signs) with === (three equals signs) when doing things like comparing idSele_UNVEHtype.value.length == 0 inside of an if statement.  Is there a performance benefit to replacing == with ===?   Any performance improvement would be welcomed as many comparison operators exist.  If no type conversion takes place, would there be a performance gain over ==?
6952
What's the best way of checking if an object property in JavaScript is undefined?
84974
int fn();  void whatever() {     (void) fn(); }   Is there any reason for casting an unused return value to void, or am I right in thinking it's a complete waste of time?  Follow up:   Well that seems pretty comprehensive.  I suppose it's better than commenting an unused return value since self documenting code is better than comments. Personally, I'll turn these warnings off since it's unnecessary noise.    I'll eat my words if a bug escapes because of it...
100647
I have a shape layer with an attribute containing NULL values to which I would like to apply a filter for values different from NULL.    Using the available gui for such query construction, one would intuitively try  "obj_art" != NULL     Which means 'give me all the features with attribute "obj_art" different from NULL' (these count definitely more than 0). Testing this query delivers a strange result from my point of view:    So what I've learned so far is that I can achieve this by using  "obj_art" IS NOT NULL   The question is, what is the difference between != NULL and IS NOT NULL?
71695
This code always works, even in different browsers:  function fooCheck() {   alert(internalFoo()); // We are using internalFoo() here...    return internalFoo(); // And here, even though it has not been defined...    function internalFoo() { return true; } //...until here! }  fooCheck();   I could not find a single reference to why it should work, though. I first saw this in John Resig's presentation note, but it was only mentioned. There's no explanation there or anywhere for that matter.  Could someone please enlighten me?
35513
Consider a partial function $f$ that is defined only for a few values of its domain (my exact use case is $\delta$ transition functions in automata). One can 'complete' it by saying $$g(x)=0\iff f(x) \text{ is not defined.}$$  Is there a symbol to mean "undefined"? Would it be correct, or accurate, to write $\nexists f(x)$?
40928
How can you check whether a string is convertible to an int?  Let's say we have data like "House", "50", "Dog", "45.99", I want to know whether I should just use the string or use the parsed int value instead.  In JavaScript we had this  function. If the string couldn't be parsed, it would get back NaN.
62033
I have a question about comparing a string with the empty string in Java. Is there a difference, if I compare a string with the empty string with == or equals? For example:  String s1 = "hi";  if (s1 == "")   or   if (s1.equals(""))    I know that one should compare strings (and objects in general) with equals, and not ==, but I am wondering whether it matters for the empty string.
13804
I hope this qualifies as a programming question, as in any programming tutorial, you eventually come across 'foo' in the code examples. (yeah, right?)  what does 'foo' really mean?  If it is meant to mean nothing, when did it begin to be used so?
107240
Quite often, in programming we get situations where null checks show up in particularly large numbers. I'm talking about things like:  if (doc != null) {   if (doc.Element != null)   {     ... and so on   }   else     throw new Exception("Element cannot be null"); } else {   throw new Exception("document cannot be null"); }   Basically, the whole thing turns into an unreadable nightmare, so I'm wondering: is there an easier way to describe what I'm trying to do above? (In addition to null checks, I get things like string.IsNullOrEmpty from time to time.)  Accepted answer: I accepted the answer that has  because the approach described is innovative, and is precisely what I want. Thanks Shawn!
115894
In C# are the nullable primitive types (i.e. bool?) just aliases for their corresponding Nullable&lt;T&gt; type or is there a difference between the two?
45364
I have seen the following technique used many times on many different shells, to test if a variable is empty:  if [ "x$1" = "x" ]; then      # Variable is empty fi   Are there any advantages on using this over the more canonical if [ -z "$1" ]? Could it be a portability issue?
23048
Technically, NULL = NULL is False, by that logic no NULL is equal to any NULL and all NULLs are distinct. Shouldnt this imply that all NULLs are unique and a unique index should allow any number of NULLs?
43859
What are all the common undefined behaviours that a C++ programmer should know about?  Say, like:  a[i] = i++;
8109
I want to match a portion of a string using a  and then access that parenthesized substring:  var myString = "something format_abc"; // I want "abc"  var arr = /(?:^|\s)format_(.*?)(?:\s|$)/.exec(myString);  console.log(arr);     // Prints: [" format_abc", "abc"] .. so far so good. console.log(arr[1]);  // Prints: undefined  (???) console.log(arr[0]);  // Prints: format_undefined (!!!)   What am I doing wrong?    I've discovered that there was nothing wrong with the regular expression code above: the actual string which I was testing against was this:  "date format_%A"   Reporting that "%A" is undefined seems a very strange behaviour, but it is not directly related to this question, so I've opened a new one, .    The issue was that console.log takes its parameters like a printf statement, and since the string I was logging ("%A") had a special value, it was trying to find the value of the next parameter.
88330
I've seen some people using void operator in their code. I have also seen this in href attributes: javascript:void(0) which doesn't seem any better than javascript:;  So, what is the justification of using the void operator?
115229
We use the so-called zero conditional when the result of the condition is always true.  What about following situation. Let's say that we have a poorly written application. :) and I complain that it simply does not work. It is always true for this version of application.  Zero conditional sounds good to me. Is it wrong to use first conditional here?   "if I press a button it crashes." "if I press a button it will crash."   thanks!