I want to align super and subscript in the display and inline equations  It should be:     Now:     There are n-number of occurrences in my manuscript, is there any possibility to achieve by a single move.  MWE:  \documentclass{article}   \begin{document}   $${_{gij}^{bj}\textbf{\textit{R}}}$$  \end{document}
8684
I am trying to put two subscripts at the left and right of a character. For example, something like:  _{t} p_{x}  where p is in the middle. How do you do this?
121680
I find that I have unpleasant spacing between the equals sign and (e.g.) the exponential function in this particular case, while using the align environment. I have a long expression which has to be split up in multiple rows. The alignment character &amp; appears to gobble up all space when it comes after the equals sign. How could I remedy this while still preserving the plus sign alignment below?   Ideally, I would like to have the second row from the first equation, and the first row from the second equation.    \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{align} % bad spacing at first row, but correctly placed second row     2 \cosh t =&amp; e^t \\             &amp;+ e^{-t}  \end{align} \begin{align} % good spacing at first row, but incorrectly placed second row     2\cosh t &amp;= e^t \\             &amp;+ e^{-t}  \end{align} \end{document}
43159
If I type    \begin{enumerate}         \item        \begin{align*}         eqn 1         eqn 2       \end{align*}   \end{enumerate}   the label will appear on the first lines and the equations will appear on subsequent lines. How do I make it so that the equations begin on the same line as the enumerate label? Obviosly, I could manually adjust the location using \vspace and \rule, but is there a better way?
40346
Is there an intelligent way to left-align the parts right of &amp; of the two cases environments shown below (if x >= 0, otherwise, if y &lt; 0, otherwise). I wonder if there is a better way than using manual spaces:  \begin{align*}  u(x) &amp;=   \begin{cases}    0        &amp; \text{if } x \geq 0 \\    1        &amp; \text{otherwise}   \end{cases}   \\  \tau &amp;=   \begin{cases}    a+b+c+d  &amp; \text{if } y &lt; 0 \\    1        &amp; \text{otherwise}   \end{cases} \end{align*}
83317
I am fairly new to TeX and need to create my math assignment with TeX.  I have succeeded aligning all my calculations with the use of \begin{align*} and \intertext{}, however in my document i have sections and subsections and if I \end{align*} and begin after the sections or subsections the alignment is off.  I have gone through google but all I can find is about \begin{equation} and has no mentioning of sections nor graphics.  How do I (if it is possible) make the alignment through the entire document?  Example:  \section{Opgave 1}  \subsection{a) Beregn arealet, der begrænses af kurven for $f(x) = x^{3}$, x-aksen og linjerne $x = -1$ og $x = 1$.} \begin{align*} % This \intertext{Først beregnes det bestemte integrale imellem $x = 0$ og $x = 1$:} \int_0^1 x^{3}\ dx &amp;= 0.25\\ \intertext{Da den er symetrisk omkring 0 kan vi tage det dobbelte areal:} 0.25 \cdot 2 &amp;= 0.50\\ \end{align*}  \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=100mm]{opg1graph.png}\\ Opg. 1, a) \end{center}  \pagebreak  \subsection{b) Bestem arealet af den lukkede figur, der dannes af parablen med regneforskriften $f(x) = -x^2 + 2x + 1$ og den rette linje med regneforskriften $g(x) = -0,5x + 1$} \begin{align*} % Is not aligned with this \intertext{Først findes de punkter hvor $g(x)$ afgrænser $f(x)$:} f(x) &amp;= g(x) \\ -x^2 + 2\cdot x + 1 &amp;= -0.5\cdot x + 1 \\ solve(-x^2 + 2\cdot x + 1 &amp;= -0.5\cdot x + 1,x) \\ x &amp;= 0\\ x &amp;= 2.5\\ \intertext{Så tager vi det bestemte integrale imellem $x = 0$ og $x = 2.5$:} \int_0^{2.5} -x^2 + 2x + 1\ dx &amp;= 3.54167 \pagebreak \intertext{Og det bestemte integrale for $g(x)$, for at fjerne arealet under linjen:} \int_0^{2.5} -0.5\cdot x + 1 dx &amp;= 0.9375 \intertext{Nu trækkes arealet under linjen fra:} 3.54167 - 0.9375 &amp;= 2.60417\\ \end{align*}
100297
I wanted to type an equation in LaTeX. But it is too long to fit into one line. It involves big arrays with many columns so I cannot split it. I wanted to reduce the font size so that it can fit in one line. However, \small doesn't work in the equation environment.
102441
The following outputs two equations side-by-side, with the equation number after each equation:  \begin{minipage}{.5\linewidth} \begin{equation}  x = y \end{equation} \end{minipage}% \begin{minipage}{.5\linewidth} \begin{equation}   y = z \end{equation} \end{minipage}     I would like to see if it looks better if the two equations stay in the same position, but with the (1) removed and the (2) becoming (1, 2) to reflect the numbers of both equations (in an assumed respective order). Is this possible?  I have searched but have only found questions asking if it is possible to only have one equation number for two equations. I want something similar to this, but displaying both equation numbers and only one set of brackets.
8929
Having different horizontally  distributed equations inside an align environment, only lines are numbered, but not individual equations.    How can the left equations be numbered using subequations? See also the question   \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document}   \begin{subequations}     \begin{align}        %\label{a}         a &amp;= a ,&amp;       \label{b}         b &amp;= b ,\\       %\label{c}         c &amp;= c ,&amp;       \label{d}       d &amp;= d .     \end{align}   \end{subequations} \end{document}     The solution should be able to either:    attach a label to the left equations, or modify the labels on the right to read (1a,b) and (1c,d)    I couldn't find anything in the documentation of amsmath or other packages.
31113
I was wondering if there is a way to have LaTeX interpret $\frac{a}{b}$ as $a/b$, but \[\frac{a}{b}\] as \[\frac{a}{b}\].   It is a little tedious to change a inline equation $a/b$ to a display equation \[\frac{a}{b}\] when doing changes to my text.
103306
I'm doing the following thing  \documentclass[leqno]{amsart} \begin{document} Example. \begin{itemize} \item Such and so \item the following holds    \begin{align}        x - 2    \end{align}        always. \item whatever else \end{itemize} \end{document}   Since I number my equations on the left, what I don't like about this is that the equation number is closer to the margin than the itemize bullets, while I would like it to be the other way around. Is there a way to do that? Maybe I should create a box or minipage with tikz (or something similar)?
10375
I have a very long equation that must be separated into two lines, and it has several pairs of nesting \left \right delimiters. Unfortunately, it seems that they need to be on the same line in order for them to work.  Also I'm using the align environment because I need the aligning functionality. Is there a way to have the size of delimiters automatically adjusted over multiple lines?
116167
I'm trying to set up a table with some equations in it, however I would like the equations on multiple rows to be aligned properly. So far I have  \begin{tabular}{cc} \hline \multicolumn{1}{l}{Header 1} \\ \hline $a = \sum_j b(c)$ &amp; $c = d$ \\ \hline \multicolumn{1}{l}{Header 2} \\ \hline $\begin{aligned}          e&amp;=fghij(y) \\          klm(x)&amp;=nop         \end{aligned}$ &amp;        $\begin{aligned}         qr&amp;=vwxyzstu \\         abcde&amp;=fghij         \end{aligned}$ \end{tabular}   which looks like    Note how the equals signs in the top row are not aligned with the corresponding equals signs in the bottom two rows.   So my question is; is there a way to align across different rows or am I going about this completely the wrong way?
109738
In this code as :     \begin{enumerate}[label=\bfseries Exercise \arabic*:]    \item 5 + 7 = 12    \item 9 + 1 = 10    \item 2 * 2 = 4 \end{enumerate}   I want the text Exercise (with its number) to be center-align and the content after that to be below and left-align. Anybody can help. Thanks.
120540
I'm currently typing a mathematical document which counts many sum symbols. I frequently use the align environment to render equations, although the default behaviour of this environment is to render the equations in displaystyle, which in my opinion wastes vertical space. I therefore have added \textstyle at the beginning of each line of math in this environment, but I'm looking for a more convenient solution.   So is there an environment that is similar to align with the exception it displays textstyle math by default ? Thank you.
79301
Consider the following code example:  \setuppapersize[A8,landscape][A8,landscape] \starttext \startformula     \startalign         \NC 1 \NC= 1\NR         \NC 2 \NC= 1\NR         \NC 3 \NC= 1\NR         \NC 4 \NC= 1\NR         \NC 5 \NC= 1\NR         \NC 6 \NC= 1\NR         \NC 7 \NC= 1\NR         \NC 8 \NC= 1\NR     \stopalign \stopformula \stoptext   Coming from a LaTeX background I would expect align to break over pages and  tells me     Somewhere between March and Arpril, \startalign lost the ability to break equations across pages. Hopefully, it will be added back soon.   So basically it is intended to have page breaks, isn't it? Question: How to enable them for align?
85339
I want to write a three line equation with left curly brace for all three, right curly brace for bottom two ones and some text at right bottom of right curly brace. All with proper alignment. I wrote following code.  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts} \usepackage{flexisym}  \begin{document}  \begin{equation*}     \begin{aligned}         K_{\mathbb{A}_{Ui}} =\begin{cases}             D                =\ g^{ \frac{ (\alpha + r) }{\beta} }\\             \left.\begin {aligned}                 &amp;D_j           &amp;=\ &amp;g^r . H(j)^{r_j} \\                 &amp;D_j\textprime &amp;=\ &amp;g^{r_j}             \end{aligned}\right\} \forall j \in   \mathbb{A}_{Ui}         \end{cases}         \end{aligned}     \end{equation*}  \end{document}   It is giving some problems.   Second and Third lines are aligned but they are not aligned with the first one. I want alignment to occur at start of "D", "=" and "g" for all three. Right now, the text at right of right curly brace is coming at center. I want it to shift down and come at bottom.   Please help. Thanks in advance.
53280
I want to show the derivation of a formula where I encounter long formulae. Unfortunately the derivation is very complex, so I have to show some intermediate steps.  My problem is, that I want to mix the behaviour of multline with align. The first line should be aligned left and the whole rest should be aligned right with respect to the longest line. This block should be aligned at the =.  At the moment, I use the align environment. But in this case, the first line is still aligned left to the $ of the other lines.  Important note: I don't like magic numbers. So I prefer solutions which are completely automatic.    My approach so far:  \documentclass{scrartcl} % Kodierung \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{lmodern} % Sprache (neue deutsche Rechtschreibung) \usepackage[ngerman]{babel} % Mathematik \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb}  \begin{document}     \begin{align}         (a+b+c+d+e+f) \\ % aligned left         % the following block should be aligned right         &amp;= a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l+m+n\\     \begin{split}         &amp;= a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l+m+n \\         &amp; \quad +o+p+q+r+s+t+u+v+w+x+y+z+1+2+3+4     \end{split}\\         &amp;= a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l+m+n+o+p     \end{align} \end{document}