There was  which was migrated to . As of current writing, the OP's username is greyed (no user profile).  However, when I checked the account, they have registered both on  and .  This issue seems to be the same as , but it's posted 5 years ago and already got , so I doubt if this is the same case. If there's a difference, then I think it's that the user never went to Meta Android.SE before (but I can't confirm).
122892
I'm a member of , but I'm not able to be a member of . I asked a question on here and it's migrated to Meta Gaming.SE, but I cannot handle the question because it's not considered mine. I also can't login or sign up in Meta Gaming.SE because it seems I'm already a member of it.  Can anyone help me solve the problem? Previously I thought every Stack Exchange site membership means you are member of its meta too.   This is from Meta Gaming.SE:    But I have  from here to there.
35937
I just joined Sports, and I decided to take a look on Sports Meta. I clicked on my profile there. This is part of what I saw:     Yet the profile shouldn't indicate that it is, in theory. . .  This seems to be a bug.
9054
I recently posted a new question on Android Enthusiasts using the official StackExchange app for Android. Right after posting the question, the app said that my question is not available.     The question is not available, it may have been deleted.   Deleted? Already?...  Then I navigated to my user name to see my recent activity. There it was! I could see the question I just posted. But if I tapped on the link to try to open it, the app kept complaining about my question not being available.     The question is not available, it may have been deleted.   But 7 minutes after posting the question, I could see my question. Here are some screenshots that showcase this issue.      This is not the first time this happens. This appears to be more or less normal behavior of the app. I don't use the StackExchange app very often to post questions. But I had exactly the same message come up when I posted a question a few months ago (and some app version numbers earlier).  This is not a major issue, but you should try to address this nevertheless. It's a small bug, but addressing it might imply much bigger changes... which might explain why it's still present... I don't really know, I'm guessing. I just thought I would let you know about it, in case you are not aware of it.  For the record, the phone is Galaxy S4 Plus (GT-I9506) running Android 4.4.2. Version number of the app is 1.0.50.
83115
If you use the mobile mode, then sort questions by newest, the usernames displayed won't be the ones of the author, they will be the one who made the last activity (just like when we sort by active in the normal mode).    I believe this is a bug, it wouldn't make much sense why it behaves different from the non-mobile mode.  Note: I didn't check with other kind of sorting, but maybe it happens with others too.
5595
It seems that  by the OP of  was attributed to the community user.   I'm assuming that the edit was by the OP from the edit summary:     updated my question   and from the actual update. Both texts are speaking in the first person.
50001
It has been my understanding that accounts are suppose to be for a specific user. This user, , is a company: . No doubt, this account has provided some quality answers. However, if a specific user cannot be identified, I don't think that the rep gain, rewards, or badges should be given. This should somehow be tagged as a 'Corporate User'. The rep has no real value when you can't be somewhat sure that the same person is giving the answers all the time.  This is where I found an answer by Devart: , peddling a product.    Edit 2 Good points have been brought up and most I can agree with. But we are setting a precedent. Meta Fudgey brought up a good point about the account's ability to use mod tools responsibly and consistently. Maybe this feature is not available to an account that appears to be an umbrella account unless a single user is identified. I think it is important to consider this aspect.    Let me re-iterate: the user(s) has provided excellent content and I would want that to continue. However, there is more at stake here than meaningful content and helpful resources.      Edit The view on 'shared' accounts wasn't so bright a year ago. For most of us, we have information in our profiles that identifies us as individuals. No, I don't have absolute knowledge of the activities on this account and how many people might use it. Meh, for all we know it could be a knowledgeable programmer with some good PR sense. On the other hand, it could be a PR person with no programming knowledge getting the answers from an employee. Who knows...
92017
I had one account through Google with email X and another account through myopenid.com. I happened to add the same email X to this myopenid.com account. My intention was to stop using the Google account in favor of the new myopenid.com account.   After some time asking and answering questions with my openid.com account I am astonished to find out that it is now merged into my Google account. That creates all kinds of privacy issues. I thought the email on my Stack Overflow account was private. Did I miss anything here?  To be clear, I wanted to preserve my privacy in the second account, but now since all my recent questions were transferred to the old account, my privacy is completely lost.  And it looks like there is no verification for the email field in my profile, so if Stack Overflow is using that info to merge, there is a very serious security bug. If it is merging based on something else, that's even worse. I think your account belongs to that user here. Let me merge it. Terrible!
31645
The active tab on  just showed this:    Normally I can see what caused that question to popup in the active list. But for migrated questions a friendly text is missing. I could only find out by .  Is the default behavior for migrated posts to show no label for the user action? It kind of would make sense as migration is not a single user action. For UX consistency I would prefer the label migrated for those cases.  User  found another similar glitch on April, 5th 2020 when a question is  to a child-meta, in this case . The active list on IPS Meta shows:        Notice that both action and user are missing here. The user did have an account on the migration date on both sites, so that is not the root cause  Can this be fixed?
15662
Today in the feed on the Android Stack Exchange app there is a Stack Overflow blog post. This post had the site icon next to it for  rather than the proper site logo (Meta).        Stack Exchange Android App Version 1.0.73 and 1.0.74 Android 5.1 on a Moto X (2013) running stock firmware.  Same behavior on a Nexus 7 (flo) running Android 6.0 (stock).  This issue also happens on the iOS app.    The most recent featured SO blog post (as of 17 Nov) is showing up with the "edX" site logo.  The logo is seemingly randomly incorrect.
10462
I recently noticed a new feature, the network profile link, just under the flag weight in my user profile page. It probably seemed like a good idea but I really don't like it. Here's why:  I am very committed to StackOverflow, use my real name for the account, take a professional approach to it and hope to use it as something of a portfolio-light at some point in the future.   Every now and then I venture onto other Stack Exchange sites but I do so with mostly different names for different SE sites. I have posted some questions and answers that I would rather not have connected back to my Stack Overflow account. They've been silly or controversial and have nothing to do with software engineering. I would rather a potential employer not see these posts or even see links to other sites I may be a member of. There are sites where mere membership can be offensive to people. For example: Atheism, Christianity, Skepticism, etc. I really do not want these sites and accounts to be linked back to something that I do take seriously such as SO.   It is also a matter of privacy. I see the network profile and accounts links as something akin to using a particular browser and finding out that the browser is publishing your history for all the world to see. Some might be OK with that but not me. There are SE sites I find interesting and want to participate in from time to time but only anonymously. Had I known that all of my SE accounts would at some point be tied and published together I would have never signed up for many of them.  I would very much like to see a check box when editing my profiles that specifies whether or not my SE accounts should be displayed.  Thank you for your consideration.
113737
I noticed that  was active recently(I lost 4 reps on SO and gained 4 on MSO) so I just checked the profile for him/her/it. First of all, I just noticed that only  account was being listed under the . Then I further noticed that it was because our dear &quot;Community&quot; has earned 2 bronze badges on Area51(namely  and ). So, how can it be so that it can earn badges only at Area51 and not on SO/MSO or other sister sites for the same actions?  On Stack Overflow  On Meta Stack Overflow
83066
I've stumbled across an inconstancy in the display of who deleted an answer.  In  on Programmers.SE there are currently two deleted answers.      The display of these two questions - one has the name of the owner, the poster, the other has the string "deleted by owner".  The differences that I can see are:   that one is a 10k+ user and the other is not and maybe the code for how it handles deletes of answers for these two is different. the dates are about a day apart, there might be different versions of the software (yet, its still rather short of a timeframe)   So... it just looks like a minor cosmetic bug that most never see, though may be hinting at duplicated code that could lead to a different bug some time down the road.  Or it could just be that two different releases of SE software put two different strings in the delete message and thats it, never mind, and everything is working as intended.    Of note, there was some tinkering of the self deleted code and display name back on July 17th - .  This isn't the discrepancy seen (neither of these are deleted users), but it might help those with access to the code to look in the area of the code.
117748
When I view the , my user account is right up top. However, I noticed that when I change the drop-down to select any other SE site, my account disappears from the list. Here's a screenshot:  I think this seems a little odd. Is anyone else seeing their own account under SO top users?
4124
This isn't directly related to the app, but probably more on the APIs it's using. The last seen on the profile page doesn't seem to reflect that I'm actively using the Android app, or taking actions. I was able to vote on items and the last seen property on the profile page said I was last seen 50 minutes ago, when I was using a computer.  I'm assuming it won't count as a visit for the Enthusiast and Fantic badges either. I don't want someone angrily posting on Meta swearing they used the app for a day, yet they lost the consecutive days and has to prove it by showing they voted for something (we're probably far from this situation since it's alpha...)
76159
I'm using Android App v1.0.23 on a HTC Velocity 4G running Android 4.0.3.  In  I've noticed that tapping the comment from user660 instantly crashes the app. I suspect it is because they don't exist any longer!
95193
I've just noticed, if somebody deletes one of his Stack Exchange accounts, his username is replaced. That's pretty nice, but comments aren't updated and still reveal the original username "@username message goes here". I think that should be updated, too.
52298
Currently, when rep is changed due to the removal of another user account (to undo the rep gain/loss that happened when they up-/down-voted/accepted/were downvoted by you), the associated message is simply "User was removed". I am not the only one who found that message rather cryptic (I had to go search meta when I saw it, and I found my answer in a duplicate, so that makes me at least the 3rd person to not understand it).  I think it's a good idea to add a link to  or some more descriptive text to that.  Edit: e.g.     Another user was removed; reputation changes linked to the user's activity were reverted.   (I can see how it's hard to fully explain the event succinctly, that's why a "what is this?" link to meta or an FAQ question/answer might be better.)