So this is pretty minor in the grand scheme of things. But, well it's still a bug.    The "add comment" link is correctly greyed out, but it is accompanied by a "requires 50 reputation" link that &mdash; at 83,921 rep &mdash; I've never seen before.  Presumably this shows up pre-login? If so, it's now started showing up for everybody on deleted questions.
11242
So I recently saw add comment (requires 50 reputation) on a deleted answer. After looking around a bit, it seems to be on all deleted posts now (only deleted posts, normal posts still say just add comment).  I'm sure it wasn't there before (I think it just said add comment (unclickable) or possible nothing).  It is also on , presumably the root cause is the same.  And yes, I do have more than 50 reputation (in case anyone was wondering).  Just to clarify, requires 50 reputation obviously shouldn't be there for users with 50 or more reputation. Choices:   Display nothing Unclickable add comment - probably not ideal Unclickable add comment (disabled for deleted posts) or something along those lines   FYI - You may be somewhat confused right about now if you can't  yet.
112652
shows the wrong badge count.  on Meta shows it was due to a temporary bug, but I've only been a member for 6 months, so this is something new I guess...
96800
A user asks a question. It gets downvoted.(to oblivion) And then gets deleted by a mod.     This question should then be accessible to the user in the "deleted recent questions" link but this doesn't happen.    If a user has asked only one question (which gets deleted) then this link goes missing. Only after asking another question (which must not get deleted), is the user able to see that link.     Is this a bug or a new-user-restriction?
65687
Well, this is annoying. Last night some idiot who'd managed to earn the association bonus for his activity on Stack Overflow decided it'd be a brilliant idea to create accounts all over the network and post dozens of comments on other people's posts asking them to take some survey. Ok, no big deal, suspend him and destroy all these bogus accounts, taking the comments with them.  ...oh. Turns out destroying an account doesn't delete the comments. Given the description reads &quot;all content&quot;, I'm considering this a bug. Steps to reproduce  Find a user that has commented somewhere. Destroy it. Note that the comments still exist.  Suggested resolution Since destroying an account already deletes all posts associated with that account (implicitly taking the comments with them), all that's really necessary here is to remove any comments that might remain on 3rd-party posts. So, do that.
64203
The bug appears, with my account, in every post that haven't any answer yet. At the bottom just above the "Your Answer" section, I always see:     Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email,   , , or .   In my mind, there should be a link to share to Twitter, Facebook, or other social networks, but I'm on any of these.
52814
If a post is deleted as spam or offensive, the user incurs a 100-rep penalty.  But SE made the conscious decision to not call that out on the reputation tab; if you go to the page of a user who's hit this penalty, you won't see those &quot;-100&quot; events in the history.  The big rep number on the profile will be correct (which is important for knowing about privileges), so you'd only notice the difference if you went through the history and added everything up -- probably not something that happens often. So these rep penalties would be invisible to most viewers, but for one thing:  (You'll need to get your own test case to verify this behavior; I'm not going to call out specific users.) How is the current rep both 404 and a smidge over 500 at the same time?  There's only one way I know for that to happen (and I know it happened here). You might think that, theoretically, answers that the user downvoted could account for the difference, because those too are not shown in rep history. But the -1 rep for downvoting answers is reflected in the graph, even if an audit of the rep history would come up with a different number. Additionally, reputation changes from normal deleted posts don't cause a discrepancy between the graph's reputation and actual reputation either. If we don't want to call out these events in the rep history, should we also do something about this graph to avoid broadcasting what happened in the summary?
38747
I propose allowing posting new comments on any post I already have comments on, even if I drop below the rep threshold for the comment-privilege (50 rep) later.  And maybe also always allow responding to any ping (editors, dupe-hammer-wielders and mod-closers can be pinged even if they never commented).    Background: I recently made  on a post. Shortly thereafter, I put bounty on another one of my questions, which brought my reputation below 50. Then, when  was posted, I was unable to respond because of the requirement that I have at least 50 reputation to comment.
7137
I took a look at my profile, where I stuck my flair. Here's the flair:    However, I don't have 28k rep. According to chat, I have 19.7k.  Note: I know about the combined flair - I've had this in my profile for at least a year. It had been showing me the same as in chat, now it isn't.   What is going on here?  Edit: I'm reporting a bug here, that the combined flair is not showing the correct number, as it has in the past.
74653
I migrated  over .  When it got there, it had lost . I’m confident that the comment wasn’t deleted by a moderator on Stats since it was gone immediately after the question arrived on that site.  This looks like a bug, no?
28970
I just bought "Reputation to the max". I bought this first, because I really want to help the cleanup of the vote-to-close queue, which, despite the efforts I've been hearing about, is still quite large. According to SO, my reputation is now 15,750, but that queue still says I need at least 3k rep to review! That is clearly a bug!
14719
Is there any reason behind the ghost reputation we gain on the meta of a Stack Exchange site? This reputation doesn't add up to anything, but it still shows me I have gained some. Is this supposed to make any sense?
38678
Today, on C.SE, I reviewed some 'Late Answers' and First Posts.  I was not even near my daily vote limit.  And yet, I was given a message that said      comments disabled on deleted / locked posts / reviews   It seems I was not the only one either:   The workaround, of course, was simply to go back and provide the guidance - but was this a design or a bug?  If it is design, why would you want to discourage the feedback? Especially with first posts, there is often a high percentage of 'didn't read the FAQ' usage, which can best be addressed by gently providing guidance. (e.g. "Unfortunately, this doesn't answer the question" or "This reads like a comment" or "This really isn't on-topic here - can I suggest you checkout our [faq]" etc...)  Timely first post guidance goes a long way towards making good users.   If it was a bug, was other functionality silently rolled out?
11181
Don't worry! I got all my 100 reputation :) It just didn't appear that way...    The notification says +100, but why does it say +97 at the top?  Edit  I created an account on server fault, and this time it says +96. I assume it's because of the down votes on this question; however, I thought down votes aren't shown in the rep you gain.
121937
I noticed  (10k only) that there is "show 2 more comments":        Clicking it has no effect.  Viewing the raw server response, it simply returns the existing comments.  This is most likely the result of , which somehow fails to update the comments count on the spammer's posts, in case they wrote comments. (And yes, I am sure those two comments have been written by that user, as I've seen them before the account was deleted.)  Can this please be fixed?  Not sure if it matters, but as can be seen in the screenshot, the question was deleted before the account has been destroyed.
73686
I logged in today and saw that 15 of my reputation points had vanished. When I opened the reputation tab, I noticed that even though at the top it showed -15, it didn't list exactly where or how my reputation went. Even the reputation counts for today and yesterday show nothing. Is this a bug of some sort?
85174
Is there a reason for this? Or is it an actual bug? I haven't received any downvotes recently, so that's not the issue.  Edit to include some questions from the comments below:  Re duplicate of : I haven't deleted any posts recently, nor have any posts of mine been deleted, as far as I can tell.     IIRC, I have downvoted an answer (or question) before (at some point in time), but I'm pretty sure it's been at least 6 months :D.  @Shadow Wizard said that maybe the answer I downvoted (-1) got deleted (+1), and then undeleted (-1).  That's possible, I guess (I had thought that they expire after a while and only mods can undelete, but I guess that's not the case).    Aannd it just happened again.  (Although as @Cai pointed out, I might have already gotten the +5 from this post so this might be a false positive (aha- see what I did there))
115916
Possible Duplicate:         Is this normal behavior in Stack Exchange sites that after just signing up one can edit not only his/her own comments / posts, but also others' comments / posts?  If so, then the Q&amp;A does not look safe to me. Imagine someone maliciously modifying a post and bringing bad reputation on a Q&amp;A member.  Can you check this and perhaps fix it?