This was experienced in a Samsung Galaxy A30s with Android 10 using Google Chrome. When a question or an answer has an edit, like , from a user that doesn't have enough reputation for it to be approved right away we see something like  Clicking in edit(1) then we'll get  In this given view it's not possible to see what's on the left side but we'll be able to scroll to the right  This happens also when the edit shows up in only one column  Didn't manage to test in other communities but I assume this to be a general behavior.
123665
When reviewing a suggested edit inline (not from the queue) on a site with the new “responsive” design, at a window width where normal content does fit, the diff window is truncated on both sides, as is the edit window after cliking “Improve Edit” or “Reject and Edit”.    This is from  which happened to have a pending suggested edit at the time, after clicking the edit(1) button. Note how the scroll bar is all the way to the left, but there's content that vanishes to the left of the window. That's in Chrome 67.0.3396.87 on Linux at zoom level 100%, with a window width of 800.  Note that I'm not complaining that the user interface isn't responsive yet (although now that this has been deployed to SO I'd expect it to be), but that the interface is completely unusable even with scrolling. In sites with the old UI, you can see all the content even if it requires scrolling.  Reviews done from the suggested edit review queue are ok (not responsive, but you can see the content by scrolling). Inline edits are ok. The problem is specific to inline suggested edit reviews.
89990
The suggested edit screen includes both the suggested edit, and the reason for the edit:        When you click to improve the edit, that comment is left as-is and hidden at the bottom of the post above the save edit button:        At the moment, when I Improve a Suggested Edit, the Comment text for that Edit is retained (though editable). It's unlikely that the comment would still apply (e.g. Suggester added a tag and Approver corrected a typo), so I would rather have the field blank.  Also, it's better to have a blank Comment than an incorrect one... many people don't bother changing the original Comment.  So that box should be blank like this instead:
72029
This only happens with the top few feed items (new since refresh maybe, or actually, maybe feed items before the update are OK, ones after aren't) but when I drag right to left to scroll between questions as soon as i get half way it snaps back. Sometimes I can get it to scroll and when I can scrolling back (left to right) works fine.  I'm on a stock Nexus 5.  P.s. On the plus side the app has some really nice ui improvements.
29525
Basically this suggestion for the Android app:   Many times I'll see that a post has been edited on the Android app. I'll want to see exactly what was edited, and the Android app doesn't show this. Can the revision history be added to the Android app?
110505
Update, April 2014: I fully support  of adding the message where it belongs—in the actual editing form. This is less intrusive than displaying it as a notification, but it serves the same purpose. Can has?     Background  When you suggest an edit, the outcome of whether it was approved or rejected is buried deep within your profile. You have to navigate to Profile » Activity » Suggestions to find a list of your recent edits, but even those do not say anything about the outcome:    waffles♦ introduced this , but what can I learn from this page? I have to manually click through the edits to see whether they were rejected or not. This is  time-consuming or inefficient at best. There's also no learning involved at all, since there is no active feedback.     Feature request #1  If an edit was rejected, there should be a notification message displayed, linking to the page of the suggested edit (which states the reject reason).    This kind of feedback would improve the editing behavior, since otherwise, inappropriate suggestions might just continue.    Feature request #2  If the above is too intrusive, the messages in the profile's Activity section should be clearer, for example like this (compare against the first screenshot in the question):        This is similar to:     Here's some more explanation:  Let's assume the case of a user suggesting lots of edits that are in some way harmful. Maybe they were too minor, like only changing keyboard shortcuts to use kbd markup instead of boldface.   Yes, we've already had this on Super User. Since it only takes one user to approve / reject there, some of these edits might even have been wrongfully accepted, others  rejected. While this is a problem of its own, the user suggesting these edits will have a hard time even getting any kind of feedback.  They would never see the rejection messages because they're buried somewhere, unless they critically checked each suggestion in their profile. I doubt anybody would do this. Even more so, they might only look at their steadily climbing reputation, not really noticing a rejected edit.  Another case is users learning how to edit. How are we  if they're not told what they did wrong? They will just continue suggesting edits until somebody actually pings them in chat or comments somewhere.  Here's an  of a user who was completely unaware that he could see feedback somewhere in a dark corner of his profile, until he was banned from editing because he'd repeated the same mistake over and over.
38493
In some cases, questions and answers that have been deleted are still showing up on /review pages. They do not have "Improve" buttons, but they can still be approved or rejected. I'm not sure what causes a post to end up in this limbo state instead of being removed from the queue entirely, which I think is what's supposed to happen.  The suggested edit I noticed this on was , but it just leads to a "Page Not Found" message now.  Tim Stone provided the following screenshot of another instance :
82940
I went to a Late Answers review queue that had four items in it and started reviewing the first one by editing it into shape rather heavily.   By the time I was done, someone else had reviewed the same post simply by upvoting it, so I only got a "Next" button, not an "I'm done" button. My edit still counted as an edit; but no longer as a review.  Worse still, the other three items were gone from the review queue as well. Curious, I checked the review tab in the profile of the user who had snatched the first review out from under me. Sure enough, he also "reviewed" the other three items, all within a minute, without even fixing obvious typos, simply by upvoting. I had to go through his review list and review every single post again.   Except, of course, my reviews didn't count as reviews anymore. My review count went up by zero. His went up by four&nbsp;&#8212; for fixing exactly nothing in posts that absolutely could use fixing. To add insult to injury, this was on a site where collecting four review points is incredibly hard because the review queues there are pretty much empty 24/7. (Edit: and now that that is also true of SO, we are seeing the same behavior here.)   So what we get are:   Subpar answers that do not get fixed and get upvoted instead and disappear from the radar of the people who are actually capable of and willing to fix them.  Fastest-gun-in-the-West, single-click, faux reviews that count towards rare Gold badges, while elaborate, actual reviews don't.   This is severely broken.  And I can't think of an easy solution that wouldn't break other things.    Simply not letting upvotes count as reviews is not an option (it discourages upvotes not just on crap, but across the board; and some posts really are fine as is and deserve nothing but an upvote). Simply always counting a review as a review, even if someone else is faster to review the same post, introduces review-point inflation and only solves the problem for one faux review, but not for several in a row, as in the scenario above. Simply letting several people review the same item, like with suggested edits, is not really "simply" anymore, and introduces more review-point inflation still. Likewise, allowing people to reject or override other people's reviews as not substantial enough opens all kinds of cans of worms.   And so on and so forth. I really can't think of anything Solomonic. But perhaps someone else can.
40317
Having recently reviewed a few suggested edits, I've found that not being able to see the comments on the post is hindering my understanding of the context of some edits.  In particular, there have been a few posts where someone has made a substantial edit to a question or answer which significantly alters its meaning. Typically I'd reject that as "too radical", since it can't be known that the new meaning of the post was what the original author intended.  However, in some cases it is clear from the comments that the original author is aware of the intended change, and as such the editor is not in fact misrepresenting the author's intentions. In these cases, it would have been useful to see the comments when making the review decision.  As an example, a common cause of this is when an inexperienced user is asked to clarify their question, and ends up writing a comment that would be better off as an edit to the question (due to length, excess code content, etc), presumably due to lack of awareness that the question can be edited. Often, other users will helpfully edit the question to include the information the OP put in the comment (see ,  and  for examples). In this situation, it is clear that the edit reflects the OP's intentions, but this information is only present in the comments which are not visible in the review interface.  Following is the suggested edit screen showing the suggested edit. It seems indentation is increased and one line is moved a few lines upwards and some empty lines added to increase readability. But it look like an invalid edit since changing the related line may cause alteration on the runtime. So not looks lie a valid edit. Better open the answer and examine it        Checking the Q&amp;A itself reveals that a talk had taken place between the OP and the answerer and revision done by the OP with the permission of the answerer. So it was indeed a valid edit.        In short: is there any particular reason comments are not displayed in the suggested edit review interface? I think it would add useful contextual information when making review decisions, and presumably this would be trivial to implement.  Note: this is not a dupe of , as it does not concern comments posted after the suggested edit.
3898
I think I found a bug on Stack Overflow, would like to have feedback if it is, so you can eventually fix it!  If I go on my personal profile in SO on the activity tab and select the suggestion button (in order to see all edits I have suggested) I see 19 entries:    However, if I select one of the suggested edits and follow the link I see in my Editor Stats that I actually have 20 edit suggestions, and so it looks as if one went lost.    What's going on?  Which stat is correct? (Don't know if it's of any use but I remember doing 20...)  EDIT:  new proof of bug added, if I go on my review section in the lateral tab I'll see this recapitulation, which goes against editor stats
18537
So... from a while back, I posted a question dealing with implementing a certain feature within an iPad app (no specifics, see  for question), and I noticed that there was an approved edit by a user named Zephyer who posted something about Windows 7.  After a face-palm, I re-edited my question to bring it back in line with my query.  So, my question then is: What the heck do we do with the occasional stupid/irrelevant edit?  I know it doesn't happen often, but there's got to be something other than just re-editing I can do!    EDIT: Excellent suggestions.  To clarify two things though:   This post is quite old.  I was a new user at the time, unaware of the rollback feature if it even existed at the time of it's posting. I just wanted to know if there was some way to get the attention of the editor.  It doesn't need to be a downvote or a flag, just a message, or an indication.
113272
The times that a suggested edit was suggested and the post was posted don't line up in the suggested edit view.        I've observed this behaviour on both MSO and SO, but can't see it in any other queues.  I'm using Chrome 27.0.1453.110 m on Windows 7 if it's relevant.
53111
Because of , clicking the "close" link on a question that's been edited (for me usually the edit comes in a half-second before, as I'm reaching for the link) reloads the question instead of opening the Close dialog. Clicking it again to actually open the close dialog says     You may only open the Close dialog every three seconds   I didn't open it, I refreshed the post.  And yes, there are lots of times when the post edit is so trivial it's obvious in less than a second that it doesn't affect the need to close the question.
63548
If a user clicks 'Edit' on an opportunity which he isn't allowed to edit, the "Insufficient Privileges" page directly appears. This is good. If a user clicks 'Edit' on a custom object (which has an edit override that points to a visualforce page), he first sees the form without problems, and the "Insufficient Privileges" page only appears when he tries to save it. This behaviour is misleading for the users, because they think they can manipulate the data and put effort into it, and only afterwards they realize that this wasn't possible after all.  An idea was to check at page load if the user has edit permissions and otherwise redirect him to the "Insufficient Privileges" page.  Might there be another way? Thanks!
84570
Currently, once an edit by a user without full edit privilege is suggested, it can be either approved or rejected.  There is a known edge case that cause suggested edits to get auto rejected: (aka edit conflict)   User with full edit privilege click "edit" and start typing. Let's name this user Joe. Since the user from previous step did not yet send the edit, users without full edit privilege can still click the "edit" as well, oblivious to the fact someone else is editing the same post in those very seconds. Such user click "edit" too and start typing. Let's name this user Kenny. Kenny is faster than Joe: he send his edit first, creating new suggested edit. Joe is still typing. Joe finally done typing. He send his edit to its merry way oblivious to the consequences. As result of the full edit made by Joe, Kenny's suggested edit is kicked away and rejected. Boom.   This is all known and reported many times.  where the user got it hard with at least two auto rejections in short period of time. Some concrete examples: , , .  For edge case, it became pretty thick edge. This is not just minor hassle: enough rejections, and the user is banned from suggesting for a whole week: and remember we're talking here about good edits made by good users. The above used to count for the ban, but . Thanks Gilles for requesting such a change!   I know it was already suggested to lock edits and similar solutions, but I suggest whole different approach: instead of auto rejecting the suggested edit, dismiss it, i.e. cancel it like it never existed same way a bounty can be revoked by moderator.  In the edit suggestion page it will show "Dismissed" instead of Approved or Rejected maybe with a tooltip explaining what caused this. This will soften the blow from those edge cases, taking the edge out of them. :)
110605
When creating a question/answer on the Android app, it gives you a little bar above the keyboard to bold/italicize, add a link easily, add a picture etc.  When editing however, this bar isn't shown. To ease editing on mobile, it would be exceedingly helpful to have this bar show up. I find myself resorting to the full site to add a embedded link if I can't at the moment remember the exact syntax.
109351
I just edited  that contained some code that was overall neat and correct, but wouldn't compile. I made it compile clean and (in my opinion) more readable.  The edit got rejected as too minor, because during my edit the OP made the code compile-clean in the grace period and thus in the diff that shows up to the reviewers, only the parts making the code more readable showed up. Such an edit is a too minor one, without question.  In my opinion there are two possibilities to solve this kind of "conflict":   When user A has edited a post and user B (>2k rep, or original author) has edited that post in the meantime user A gets a message that the post has changed and is asked to revise that edit based on the changes made in the meantime. The easier one: Don't allow edit suggestions in the grace period.   I don't care about the missing reputation I would have gotten if the suggestion had been approved. I just don't like my suggestions being reviewed on a false basis - because the diff that is displayed to the approvers does not display the correct edit.  Doing a quick search here on meta I found some questions maybe related to this problem - none of them however addresses the problem of the review based on incorrect diffs:
52017
I just noticed that clicking a JS-like link on MSO (like to show more hot network questions) just bumps me to the top of the page and doesn't do anything else.   Also, adding a comment or any other JS-related feature (i.e. inline editing, 10k inline comment editing) is borked.