I reached my daily limit many times for reviewing edits on Stack&nbsp;Overflow.  Yet, I always have the number of edits to review. And when clicking on it, it tells you that you can't review more; you reached daily limit. This annoyed me when I forgot that I already did.    I suggest when the daily limit is reached to either:   Hide it Turn it to gray color, or any other non-attracting color.
38618
Now that I've reached 2k on Stack Overflow, I get access to the "Suggested Edits" review queue.  Although I only have 20 edits per day, the "suggested edit awaiting" icon in the top bar is always there and it bothers me a lot!  My suggestion is to apply one of three solutions:   Remove the suggested edits icon when we reach the maximum (50) edits Remove the Highlight (orange) on the suggested edits Remove the suggested edits part when we click on it   What do you think?
117370
On the one hand, I see very few posts in the review queue when I visit.  On the other hand, I see a lot of pretty awful first posts sitting on the front page.  This leads me to suspect that robo-reviewers are blowing through the queue.  Given how empty the queue is, could you please increase the number of people who have to check in before a post leaves the queue?  Of course, some honey-pot solution to detect and disable the auto-clickers would be even better.
45901
Already I have lost all hope of looking at late answers etc. It's just a parade of meh. I can't make any kind of intelligent decision because I can't see the other answers to the question, for instance. There's no Looks Good, only Skip, and those feel different to me. So I've been more interested in .  But people keep approving crap while I'm looking at it. Two or three "the post was already approved; please visit to edit" and I'm just "screw this whole thing".  Can we do something like one reject bounces all existing votes: you need three approves in a row? Because a lot of people are stupidly approving and actually driving me away from the queue.    Note this is less about letting bad edits through and more about keeping reviewers motivated.
28586
On Stack Overflow, where I am not a 10K user, I can only see my decisions, on review-beta/suggested-edits/history. On sites where I am a 20K user, I can see decisions made from other users.  Is that caused from my reputation, or is Stack Overflow an exception?
112812
I came up with an idea for how to begin putting an end to the edit/rollback wars and then the ensuing comments battle...   What if you are only allowed to edit a post (not the author) once a day. What if you are also only allowed to rollback one edit to your post a day. There would not be a overall limit on the users ability to edit other posts other than the one edit per post per day. There would also not be a limit on the number of times a single post could be edited or rolledback (multiple users), but each edit/rollback would trigger the 24 hour wait... There is currently some threshold in place that allows a post to be edited after it is posted without calling it an edit.  This same threshold could apply to the edit in case a mistake is made (fat fingered, mis-tagged, etc.) which would allow the editor a window of time to correct a mistake before getting locked out.     If either the editor or rollerbacker feel that the current state of the post is not acceptable and they are out of mods for the day, then a moderator can get flagged through the current process.
89310
I must get up to 5 or 6 of my daily Suggested Edits that have the following as Edit Summary:     Fix bad grammer [sic]   Maybe I'm just a spelling/grammar/syntax Nazi, but it makes me angry that people who are supposedly improving the grammar of a post can't write 3 words without making a blatant error.  Is it OK to not even give a glance to the actual changes and reject the edit solely based on badly spelled Edit Summary?
102990
The below bug doesn't always happen, but does most of the time. Steps to reproduce:  Go to any review queue Post a comment Edit the comment Click Save Edits  Result:  Obviously the red box above is the annoying bug...  :-)
60202
As the title suggests, I am blocked for 7 days for reviewing the posts!   Today when I clicked on the counter for reviews (I don't know the exact name for that), I was able to review the content. I reviewed 2 posts and responded as needed!   Here is the thing: I was able to review even while blocked for being stupid while reviewing!  Was it a bug or something else? It happened just a bit ago.        There are the reviews that I did just an hour ago. When I clicked the same link, it reminded me that I am not able to review posts for 3 days more. (7 was the real count!)        I have no idea if this was a bug! Can anyone tell me?
4822
First time I've got the following message on SO:     Too many of your edits were rejected,   try again in 7 days.   Although, I have made ~50 accepted edits this day.  I'm sure that should outweigh the ~5 rejected edits, right?    My suggestion:  bool allowEdit(USER u) {     if(u.rejected * 5 &gt; u.accepted)         return(false);     else         return(true); }   Think of it this way: if I do a 1000 accepted edits, and mess up on 5 [rejected], does that mean I should get banned for 7 days?    Hmmm... There seems to be a bug; the message only appears when clicking edit from review.  But otherwise, I can't edit , even when going to it from the homepage.
113223
In the toolbar, only the Suggested Edits queue quantity is shown. (I assume this because clicking on this number takes me directly to Suggested Edits every time.)    Why does this number only represent Suggested Edits and not all of the different review queues? Obviously, the close queue is always ridiculous (), so perhaps that one is worth excluding. But why are the rest not considered in this number?  If there is a disparity in mixing the different queue's totals, why show a number at all? Why not change it to some sort of icon notification if there are any review tasks available to be completed?
8342
As a little feature to prevent comment spam, you can only enter one comment every 15 seconds. That's a very reasonable limitation, since you very rarely have a good reason to write comments that quickly. I've only seen it twice at all, I think, but both times it was extremely annoying.     Only 1 comment allowed per 15 seconds; timer reset.   The reason is that every time you hit the limit, the 15 seconds begin anew. You have no indicator that tells you when you are allowed to comment again, and if you hit enter after just 14 seconds, you're back to zero. Yesterday, I went through four cycles of not quite 15 seconds, counting in my head, before I got a myself a coffee and tried again afterwards.  I suggest that you do one or more of the following (in decreasing order):   Make the counter non-restarting Add a visible countdown Make it clearly visible that you can't comment right now You can actually increase the waiting time, if it is clearly visible and there is no unnerving invisible countdown. Actually, just remove all comment fields after one comment, and tell the user to reload the page. Just please don't have UI elements that look like they would work, but feel like they are trolling you.
3823
In the review page, it shows stats of recent reviewers. But it is showing wrong stats. Because today (on Monday) it shows week count 53 (on Meta Stack Overflow) which is impossible as there is a limit of 20 reviews per day.    PS: This bug   and . But the bug has occurred again.
80782
The suggested edits count at top is incorrect. Multiple browser refreshes did not clear it. Approving/Rejecting review decreases the count, but as you can see the count is incorrect.
22334
We need a hard rate limit on suggested edits, to limit the damage someone can do with blasting the review queue with minor edit suggestions.  Case in point:  peppered the site with a whopping 133 tag-only edit suggestions in 2 hours and 15 minutes. That's one edit every minute on average, but towards the end he was entering a new suggestion every 20 seconds. He only stopped because a  drew enough rejections to have him banned from entering more.  If there was a limit to the number of suggested edits you can enter in a time period we could have stopped this guy earlier. No &lt;2k user needs to edit hundreds of tags across that many questions in 2 hours time.  Considerations   There are cases where a retag drive or tag burninate justifies editing a larger number of posts, but I'd be fine if such tasks were limited to people with 2k+ reputation. A retag or burninate job requires a minimal engagement with the community to know when they are justified anyway. The suggested edit review process, by itself, was clearly not enough to stop this barrage. It cannot be seen as a rate limiting measure, at least not as a sufficiently efficient one.  The vast majority of the edits made in the above example were too minor, leaving spelling, grammar and formatting mistakes in the post untouched. The user was going too fast to pay attention to such details anyway. Yet this user has 98 approved edit suggestions, but all but 6 or 7 I'd have rejected as too minor, so the review process itself is broken.   What should be limited   The number of review votes reviewers have is already limited; I burned through 20 reviews in short order just reviewing the suggestions from just this one user. Certainly the number of unreviewed suggestions should be limited to let reviewers catch up with a user like this. I'd say having 20 outstanding suggested edits pending review is plenty. Suggested edits should be made with some consideration; we don't want minor edits, so if you are suggesting more than 20 in an hour (that's 1 every 3 minutes) you are not improving posts anymore, you are gaming the system to gain reputation.
114431
I have an answer on  that gets 2-3 spam edits a day. The other   also receive near daily spam edits when the posts are not locked.  The question has been protected however this just seems to stop new answers could the protection be changed to stop edit suggestions by those with &lt;10 rep as well as new answers etc.  The issue is that for each suggested edit two reviewers have to clean up the mess. The original poster also gets their inbox spammed with edit review notifications.  The previous question did not answer this as steps were taken to stop this which this question showed were not enough
47207
The day before yesterday I reviewed  in  (I have > 2K rep there).  I clicked on “Improve Edit”, made some more changes, and saved (submitted) them.  All the changes were made (both the ones “suggested” by  and mine), and  shows two revisions — #5, by Chema, and #6, by me — made at the exact same time.   The issue is that revision #5 is shown as having been reviewed by the Community user, with no indication that I did an Improve Edit:          unlike the normal way it looks when I improve an edit:         Also, I looked at my editing stats, and they were the same before and after:        [Scott has approved 1267 edit suggestions and rejected 750 edit suggestions and improved 289 edit suggestions] Normally the third number (improved ___ edit suggestions) would go up by one. Also, it does not appear in my Review history ( → “Activity” → “all actions” → “reviews”) or .   This happens on a recurring, but occasional (irregular, irreproducible), basis.  For example, see , , and .  I did “Reject and Edit” on all three, but I didn’t “get credit” for .
2092
We all know       , but it seems the problem is people not reviewing enough. Whenever I had time, I would go through all 40 that I was given, but by then I wanted to do more. Would raising that limit of 40 and not counting Close Votes queue votes towards your daily close vote allowance help?