I edited a post which was in need to have the code formatting fix, and at the same time the post's author fixed what I was fixing before I hit the Save Edits button! Now my edit, which there is no need for, is in pending review.  So how can I remove suggested edit in pending review?
17564
Edits made by users who do not have edit privileges are placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.  E.g., I edited someone else's answer. but changed my mind. If I'd edited my own question/answer, there would be a "Rollback" button, but there's no such button in the scenario I'm describing (at least none that I can see).  This is more relevant today because users can only have at most five edits waiting in the queue, and allowing one to cancel an edit would permit them to free up one of their five pending edits for something else.  Is there a way to remove one's edit from the peer review queue?
106245
Now we have a nice side-by-side diff in the 'suggested edits' review pages, and as an , could something similar be made available as an option when editing a post?  It wouldn't need to be interactive - a button to get the side-by-side diff of the current state of your edit, versus the original would do.  This would be useful when shuffling lots of whitespace around - a final check that you haven't broken some embedded code.  A workaround at the moment is to submit the edit, then check the side-by-side view in the edit history.
80782
The suggested edits count at top is incorrect. Multiple browser refreshes did not clear it. Approving/Rejecting review decreases the count, but as you can see the count is incorrect.
41649
suggested edit made one change to the question -- changing the title to ALL CAPS.  I rejected it with a custom note and was pleased to see that the review was rejected by other reviewers as well.  However, out of curiosity, I looked at the  made by the user and ran into .  It is evident that the user has removed all the import statements from the code and the review was happily approved by three reviewers.  I don't quite agree that the review should have been approved.  Of course, I can rollback and make revision to the post in order to fix it but have some questions:   Does a mechanism exist for flagging such reviews? Shouldn't reviewers be given a break for permitting such changes?
26337
I was in the first posts review queue and chanced on a post with a suggested edit. (Note: I have enough reputation to review suggested edits.) I clicked on “edit (1)” and was taken into the suggested edits queue. When I approved the suggested edit, I was taken to the next suggested edit, and so on until there were no more suggestions (“There are no items for you to review.”, still in the suggested edits queue). In this situation, I think it would make more sense if I was brought back to that post I was working on in the first posts queue, as soon as I acted on its suggested edit. Alternatively, the suggested edit should be shown in the same kind of pop-up as on a question thread page. The same goes for other queues (late answers, low quality, etc.).
120913
When reviewing the First Posts (and Late Answers) review queue, after you suggest an edit, you're back in the review queue and the I'm Done button is activated. So far, so good, but when I realize I want to edit something else as well (I often forget the tags), I can click the 'edit' link again. When I'm done improving my suggested edit, I'm suddenly outside the review queue.    This does not happen if you have enough reputation (2k) to edit posts straight away; then you always stay in the review queue.
89990
The suggested edit screen includes both the suggested edit, and the reason for the edit:        When you click to improve the edit, that comment is left as-is and hidden at the bottom of the post above the save edit button:        At the moment, when I Improve a Suggested Edit, the Comment text for that Edit is retained (though editable). It's unlikely that the comment would still apply (e.g. Suggester added a tag and Approver corrected a typo), so I would rather have the field blank.  Also, it's better to have a blank Comment than an incorrect one... many people don't bother changing the original Comment.  So that box should be blank like this instead:
85307
I think we need a button that says Edit and Close added to the Review Close button options.  Many of these closed posts will be around forever (and should be, closed should not just be a path to deletion), so they need editing.  If I edit it now it goes away, with the only option being a back click to get back to the review, and then click into the post and edit it.  We have an Edit and Reopen button, so this would fit in just fine.
23543
Related, but subtly different, proposals (they were created before the edit for the masses changes):       StackOverflow guidelines encourage users to correct typos, and I often do. However a new feature has now sprang up, which allow users who do not have sufficient reputation to edit on their own to propose an edit and have it reviewed. In order not to be spammy (I guess) there is also a restriction: they must at least edit 6 characters in the post.  This, however, prevent the correction of simple typography/spelling errors by those same low-reputation users (which I am on other stack exchange sites)... and the simple way to get around this is to pad the questions with whitespaces.  Now, this work-around is fair and all... but really unsatisfying: if the goal of the 6 characters limit is to prevent minor editions, then it fails utterly because of this "whitespace" bug.  My proposal is therefore:  Creating a new threshold for minor-edits of posts  The current edit treshold is at 2000 points; minor edits (those under that 6 characters count) could be allowed from as low as 500 points.   This would reduce the "noise" in the edits to approve. This would remove this annoying "warning" for users who only wish to improve things   Of course the user whose post has been edited should be notified as for a "regular" edit (unless it's community wiki ?)  I have no strong opinion as to bumping those minorly edited posts.
17332
I've noticed that the reviewer stats in the review queue contain awkward uses of :        has approved $count edit suggestions and rejected $count edit suggestions and improved $count edit suggestions    This has always irked me but I never bothered to complain about it publicly til now. The wording should be changed to       has approved $count edit suggestions, rejected $count edit suggestions and improved $count edit suggestions    Or one of the better suggestions from   The discussion about whether there should be a  in the sentence is a separate one entirely, but I think it's unnatural and unreadable to string the ands together like they are.
94108
Just now I edited an answer and got four points instead of two.    I checked , but I already had a few other suggested edits approved, and it has always been two points...  Here is the question:    Is this a bug?  Update:  Checking the revisions, I can see two revisions, both at same time and the content is also the same. Links are also identical. Possibly this is the cause of the issue I feel:
90634
I'm blocked from reviewing for some time, but I'm not blocked from editing. I would like to edit someone's question, but there is another suggested edit review pending. I can't approve it because of the review ban, but also I can't do any other edit as when I click "edit" it redirects me to approve the edit. Is that expected or this is a bug?
98328
TL;DR  I am requesting that a button be added to the Suggested Edit Review Queue interface to reject an edit and flag the post that the edit was made on.  Background  I started working through the Suggested Review Queue recently, and I've noticed that there are often edits made on posts that should just be deleted or closed. I feel that time spent "polishing turds" is wasted, both for the editor and edit reviewers. I currently handle these by rejecting the edit, visiting the original post, and flagging the question myself.  This three-step process occurs regularly enough that I think it should be made easier.  Therefore, I am requesting that a button be added to the Suggested Edit Review Queue toolbar for flagging posts. I also suggest that this button reject the edit by default, with a message similar to the following:     This edit was made on a post that should have been flagged for deletion or closing.   There is a related discussion on Meta Stack Overflow .  Expected Impact  Pros     Reviewers can get through the queue a little bit faster by reducing the amount of navigation required to help maintain site quality   Having the option more easily accessible will encourage reviewers to consider deleting posts that are not up to site quality standards     Cons   If edit reviewers find it easier to flag posts, the number of posts getting sent into the Low Quality Post and Close Vote queues may increase   My response: We as a community seem to have already decided that the cost of review effort is worth the benefit of having a cleaner site. I believe that this feature request coincides with that sentiment. Additionally, the user that suggested the edit will see this new reason for why their edit was rejected, which will discourage them from making further edits on unsalvageable posts, reducing the size of the Suggested Edit Review queue.   Adding a flag option may muddle the scope of what edit reviewers are supposed to do   My response: I agree with the assertion made by  answer, which is that the purpose of edit reviews is to just the quality of the edit, not the quality of the overall post. However, I am not trying to imply that edit reviewers should necessarily begin judging the original post. But if, in the course of judging the review, it becomes obvious that the whole post is garbage, then I think flagging the post is a reasonable action and we should encourage that behavior.  Side Note I do not have 3k reputation on any site, so I don't know exactly how the close vote and delete vote interfaces work. For users over 3k, I would suggest that the "Reject and Flag Original Post" button be replaced with a "Reject and Vote to Close Original Post" or "Reject and Vote to Delete Original Post" button, or something similar.  Conclusion  I acknowledge that flagging/deleting/closing original posts is beyond the scope of the Suggested Edit Review Queue, but I think it is a useful behavior that we should encourage in edit reviewers by making it easier.
42209
Where can I find my pending/approved/rejected suggested edits? (a bit like the Flagging Summary page)
73307
Since we are rejecting their edit, we should still be able to add a comment to the reject reason when reviewing a suggested edit as "Reject and Edit".  For example, take  which attempted to add a &lt;!-- language --&gt; comment to the post. He put the comment at the beginning of the post, which means the comment doesn't do anything at all (I tested, it didn't get used). The comment has to be placed directly above the code block it affects.  This means I had to go in and improve the edit just to move it to a different spot. I chose "Reject and Edit" instead of "Improve Edit" because it wasn't helpful. The edit he made was incorrect since it was in the wrong spot. But that suggested edit permalink page only marks it as "Rejected by Community ♦" with the canned reason that the edit didn't correct critical issues with the post. It would be nice to be able to explain to the user that they put the comment in the wrong spot, and how to properly insert language comments. Also, the canned comment wasn't really correct in this case.  Note: I know some people might argue that I should have instead chosen "Improve Edit" since it made me make the correct edit or whatever, but that is a bad argument. You have to remember that choosing that option adds that incorrect revision to the revision history. It's far better off only having the correct revision. Also, the suggester will likely just ignore it, and make incorrect edits of the same type later on.  Also, expanding off a , the reject reason should be listed under my username rather than Community, listing Community as a second reject-user only when another user hasn't rejected the post as well.
15588
On Stack Overflow, suggested edits need two reviewers. So when you're the first reviewer to give your opinion (approve or reject) or if you're the second but vote the other way than the first reviewer, the edit stays in the queue. This has two annoying consequences when you're going through the  (5k only):   If you cast the deciding vote, the entry for this edit disappears from the list (it's moved to a header line at the top of the list). Otherwise the edit remains in place. This is annoying because it means the position of the next entry on the screen depends on something that shouldn't be relevant (whether you just cast the deciding vote). It's especially annoying because the entry can take a couple of seconds to disappear when it does, which has led me to click on the wrong row a couple of times, when the next edit was an obvious accept or reject. If you revisit the list and one of the edits you voted on still hasn't been decided, the entry appears again (with no buttons). Why show me the entry again? There's nothing I can do about it any more.   Here's the behavior I'd like:   An edit never disappears from the list as long as I don't reload the page. If I reload the page, edits I've already voted on don't appear.   Alternatively:   When I've voted on an edit, it disappears to the collapsed list at the beginning, and stays there even if I reload the page. The disappearance should be instantaneous, with no fading.   Either way, please make the behavior on voting consistent whether my vote was the deciding one or not. And if the page is changed when I click on a vote button, the change should be instantaneous.  But please don't let that deter you from reviewing a few suggested edits on Stack Overflow.  and review one page (30 suggestions). We get 500–800 suggestions on a typical day. If 2% of the eligible ~5000 people do one page every day and vote on half the suggestions they see, we're good.
83180
I goofed and rejected a suggested edit, a vote that was actually directed at the previous edit that I was reviewing. As this is unfair to the user who posted the suggested edit in question, is there any way in which to change/cancel my reject?