When I run  \documentclass{article} \begin{document} Aaaaaa aaaaa aajcaaaaaa $a:A_{aa}\to a_a$a$\ge$ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa  $a_a\dots\to$ \end{document}   the build output contains the following line:  LaTeX-Result: 1 Error(s), 0 Warning(s), 1 Bad Box(es), 1 Page(s)   When I click on Next Error, it points in the build output to the line starting with ! in the following paragraph:  Overfull \hbox (1.65294pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 3--4 []\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 Aaaaaa aaaaa aa-j-caaaaaa $\OML/cmm/m/it/10 a \OT1/cmr/m/n/10 : \OML/cmm/m/it/10 A[] \OMS/cmsy/m/n/10  ! \OML/cmm/m/it/10 a[]$\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 a$\OMS/cmsy/m/n/10 $ \OT1/cmr/m/n/10 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa $\OML/cmm/m/it/10 a[ ] [] \OMS/cmsy/m/n/10 !$   []   Looking up this error, I see that something similar shows up with fonts, but the error code is slightly different.  My guess is that it's something to do with the $\to$ at the end being overflowed, but that's not all because I can move some of the letters around without changing how big of a bad box it is to remove the error.  Can someone tell me what the cause of this error is?  UPDATE: According to the one of the comments, it may depend on what program is being used.  I got this error on both TeXnicCenter, and this error code also appears on  but it is not reported as an error.
120726
In passing from the code  \item $\Sp^\Sigma(\C,K)$ has a left proper, cellular model category structure, called the \textbf{projective model structure}, where a map $f\colon X\rightarrow Y$ in $\Sp^\Sigma(\C)$ is a weak equivalence (resp., a fibration), if $f_n\colon X_n\rightarrow Y_n$ is a weak equivalence (resp., a fibration) in $\C$, for all $n\in\bbN$.   to the code  \item $\Sp^\Sigma(\C,K)$ has a left proper, cellular model category structure, called the \textbf{projective model structure}, where a map $f\colon X\rightarrow Y$ in $\Sp^\Sigma(\C,K)$ is a weak        % ← added ",K" equivalence (resp., a fibration), if $f_n\colon X_n\rightarrow Y_n$ is a weak equivalence (resp., a fibration) in $\C$, for all $n\in\bbN$.   where the only difference is in the marked K, I get the following Latex error at line 1, when trying to compile my document:     ! \OML/cmm/m/it/10.95 Y$ \OT1/cmr/m/it/10.95 in $[][]\OT1/cmr/m/n/10.95 (\U/eus/m/n/10.95 C\OML/cmm/m/it/10.95 ; K\OT1/cmr/m/n/10.95 )   This makes absolutely no sense to me and I can not find much help on-line. Note also that, if I leave the problematic piece of code unaltered and keep on typing other stuff, I have no problem in compiling (even when I add a lot of code).  Upon seeing some comments, let me try to clarify the problem better. The following code uses all the packages I am using and compiles with no problems  \documentclass[11pt]{amsart}  \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}  % to allow unicode in source  \pagestyle{plain}  %% AMS and other general math packages: \usepackage{amsthm} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \let\amssquare\square \usepackage{dsfont} \usepackage{marvosym} \usepackage{mathpartir} \usepackage{mathtools} % for \mathclap, used to center extra-wide diagrams. \usepackage{stmaryrd}  %% General style packages: \usepackage{xcolor} \definecolor{darkgreen}{rgb}{0,0.45,0} \definecolor{darkred}{rgb}{0.75,0,0} \definecolor{darkblue}{rgb}{0,0,0.6} \usepackage[colorlinks,citecolor=darkgreen,linkcolor=darkred,urlcolor=darkblue]{hyperref} \usepackage{breakurl} \usepackage[mathscr]{eucal} \usepackage{enumerate} % for customising enumerated listsEDIT: \usepackage[capitalize]{cleveref}    %\parskip = 0.1in %\parindent = 0.0in  %% For syntax of type theory: \usepackage{mathpartir}  %% Graphics and diagrams packages: \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{arrows} \usepackage[all]{xy} \xyoption{2cell} \xyoption{curve} \UseTwocells  \newcommand{\Sp}{\mathsf{Sp}} \newcommand{\C}{\mathscr{C}} \newcommand{\bbN}{\mathbb{N}}   \begin{document} \begin{itemize} \item $\Sp^\Sigma(\C,K)$ has a left proper, cellular model category structure, called the \textbf{projective model structure}, where a map $f\colon X\rightarrow Y$ in $\Sp^\Sigma(\C,K)$ is a weak equivalence (resp., a fibration), if $f_n\colon X_n\rightarrow Y_n$ is a weak equivalence (resp., a fibration) in $\C$, for all $n\in\bbN$. \end{itemize} \end{document}   This is the exact same code I am using in my problematic file and that does not allow me to compile. If, in my problematic file, I replace the second occurrence of   $\Sp^\Sigma(\C,K)$   with  $\Sp^\Sigma(\C)$   I do not generate any error.  (The command \end{document} is present in the file, I just could not screenshot it). Again, the only thing that causes texmaker not to compile is adding that extra ,K. I am unable to get the error from the log file, as was suggested in the comment.
28434
Using pdflatex, the command  $e^{a\overbrace{+b+c}}$   results in a bigger size font of the part +b+c under the brace. If I do:  $e^{a\overbrace{\scriptstyle +b+c}}$   the size of +b+c is fixed but the size of the brace is still wrong: the brace has the same size than before but, since the interior font is now smaller, white spaces appear.  Can we fix this?  NOTE: This question can be considered a duplicated of . However, the solutions in that question do not tackle the brace size problem. I don't have enough repuation to add this as a comment there and I don't think it is a good idea to add an answer that is rather a question.  NOTE2: Using mathtools does not change the problem.
40072
When I compile my PDF from LaTeX source, do I have to care about all the messages (currently 28) about 'bad boxes'?  The PDF seems fine to me.
73796
I am using this LaTeX code to generate three tables side by side. However, it showing errors and not giving satisfactory result. Can anyone please help me to short out the problem.  \begin{table} \centering \makebox[0pt][c]{\parbox{1.2\textwidth}{% \begin{minipage}[b]{0.265\hsize}\centering \begin{tabular}{ | c | c |c | } \multicolumn{3}{c} \hline {$q=1/10$} \\ \hline T &amp; $r_h$ &amp; $\omega$ \\  \hline 0.233 &amp; 0.135 &amp; 2.38486-0.34667I  \\  0.256 &amp; 0.140 &amp; 2.38092-0.35837I \\ 0.273 &amp; 0.145 &amp; 2.38049-0.35982I \\  0.278 &amp; 0.146 &amp; 2.38007-0.36130I \\  0.281 &amp; 0.147 &amp; 2.37964-0.36282I \\  \hline 0.284 &amp; 0.761 &amp; 2.54150-2.03209I \\ 0.285 &amp; 0.765 &amp; 2.54515-2.04292I \\ 0.289 &amp; 0.800 &amp; 2.57799-2.13761I \\ 0.302 &amp; 0.900 &amp; 2.67987-2.40712I \\ 0.312 &amp; 1.000 &amp; 2.79214-2.67552I \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{minipage} \hfill \begin{minipage}[b]{0.265\hsize}\centering \begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c | } \multicolumn{3}{c} \hline {$q=1/9$} \\ \hline T &amp; $r_h$ &amp; $\omega$ \\ \hline 0.227 &amp; 0.150 &amp; 2.34385-0.41094I  \\  0.245 &amp; 0.155 &amp; 2.34215-0.41723I \\ 0.260 &amp; 0.160 &amp; 2.34056-0.42416I \\  0.271 &amp; 0.165 &amp; 2.33908-0.43175I \\  0.276 &amp; 0.167 &amp; 2.33852-0.43497I \\  \hline 0.280 &amp; 0.720 &amp; 2.50248-1.92299I \\ 0.283 &amp; 0.750 &amp; 2.52893-2.00424I \\ 0.286 &amp; 0.780 &amp; 2.55660-2.08533I \\ 0.289 &amp; 0.800 &amp; 2.57568-2.13931I \\ 0.302 &amp; 0.900 &amp; 2.67807-2.40842I \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{minipage} \hfill \begin{minipage}[b]{0.265\hsize}\centering \begin{tabular}{ | c | c | c |} \multicolumn{3}{c} \hline {$q=1/8$} \\ \hline T &amp; $r_h$ &amp; $\omega$ \\  \hline 0.246 &amp; 0.180 &amp; 2.29733-0.50611I  \\  0.255 &amp; 0.185 &amp; 2.29654-0.51364I \\ 0.263 &amp; 0.190 &amp; 2.29589-0.52172I \\  0.269 &amp; 0.195 &amp; 2.29534-0.53033I \\  0.273 &amp; 0.199 &amp; 2.29496-0.53758I \\  \hline 0.275 &amp; 0.675 &amp; 2.46067-1.80426I \\ 0.277 &amp; 0.700 &amp; 2.48131-1.87194I \\ 0.288 &amp; 0.800 &amp; 2.57245-2.14170I \\ 0.302 &amp; 0.900 &amp; 2.67555-2.41027I \\ 0.317 &amp; 1.000 &amp; 2.78870-2.67796I \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{minipage}% }} \end{table}
7538
In the following code, I need to use +/- where I have used it, and plus/minus where I have used it.  \documentclass{amsart} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{calc} \parindent=0 pt \parskip=12 pt plus 0 pt minus 0 pt \def\headsep{25pt} \newcommand{\LAYOUT}[5]{%   \setlength{\hoffset}{0pt}   \setlength{\voffset}{0pt}   \setlength{\topmargin}{#1 - 1in - \voffset - \headheight - \headsep}    \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{#2 - 1in - \hoffset}   \setlength{\evensidemargin}{\oddsidemargin}   \setlength{\textheight}{#3}   \setlength{\textwidth}{#4}   \setlength{\marginparwidth}{#5} } \newcommand{\FULLPAGE}{\LAYOUT{1in}{1in}{9in}{6.5in}{0.75in}}  \FULLPAGE \begin{document} \lipsum[1-10] \end{document}   If I replace the plus and minus in line 5 with + and - I get an enigmatic  "missing begin{document}" error.    If I replace the minus's in lines 10-11 with "-" I get an equally enigmatic error:  "Missing number, treated as zero. Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted)."   Can somebody please explain when one can use +/- and when one can use plus/minus?  Presumably there's a good reason why latex's error messages are so completely mystifying, and why inconsistencies like these keep appearing? It's really hard to explain to my coauthors, who regularly complain that latex is the most infuriating program ever devised by mankind.  Thanks very much for any advice!   Leo
60148
Recently,I found the code that cotains the"~\\" and blank line always shows the warning imformation "Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines"  \documentclass{ctexart} \usepackage{color} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{epstopdf} \hfuzz=\maxdimen   $(A \pm  B)^{-1} \neq A^{-1} \pm B^{-1}$,$(A \pm  B)^* \neq A^* \pm B^*$~\\  $|(A^*)^*|=|A|^{n^2-2 n+1}$~\\  \end {document}   I add the code:  \tolerance=10000 \hbadness=10000 \begin{document}   However,fail to solve it!
26785
I'm working on a large document in Emacs (23.2.1) org-mode (7.8.06) which I export to LaTeX. At present, the outline/structure of the document has been created, but not any of the content. The LaTeX version (which consists of \section, \subsection, \subsubsection and items mainly) has broken pagination, a blank page and text that runs off the page.  I shortened the document by moving \end{document} around to try to find the problem. In some cases, the document rendered correctly. This seems to be related to too many "section" types headings in LaTeX with no content.  To test this, I added  \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{blindtext}   to my document and then inserted \blindtext "content" for most of the sections/subsections. The document now renders correctly.  The documentclass is article and the only package loaded is .  Are there any known issues with pdfLaTeX/pdfTeX where a document contains only/mainly section headings and not much, if any, content? The only relevant error message pdflatex generated was:  Overfull \vbox (333.44125pt too high) has occurred while \output is active [5] [6]   I'm using pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian).  An example can be found . The only required package is hyperref.
29033
The following code does not compile:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document}  \begin{align}      \eta_{m} = &amp; \omega_{m1}D_{1} + \omega_{m2}D_{2} + \dots + \omega_{mT}D_{T} \\     \eta_{a} = &amp; \omega_{a1}D_{1} + \omega_{a2}D_{2} + \dots + \omega_{aT}D_{T}  \end{align}  \end{document}   However, if I remove empty lines, it does. (Same with equation environment). Why? Why would it be problematic for a code to allow spaces? Convention?   For reference, the error in TexStudio is quite dramatic, for an apparent trivial issue:  line 7: Paragraph ended before \align was complete. line 7: Missing $ inserted. line 7: Missing \endgroup inserted. line 7: Display math should end with $$. line 8: Misplaced alignment tab character &amp;. &amp; line 8: Missing $ inserted. &amp; \omega line 9: Misplaced alignment tab character &amp;. &amp; line 10: Missing $ inserted. line 11: Misplaced \cr. \end{align} line 11: Misplaced \noalign. \end{align} line 11: Misplaced \noalign. \end{align} line 11: Extra }, or forgotten \endgroup. \end{align} line 11: Missing $ inserted. \end{align} line 11: Display math should end with $$. \end{align}   NOTE: I am aware of , , and  question. But none of them explains why empty lines are problematic (besides a trivial and rather tautological answer like "the code does not allow it").
34477
I want to write shell Code in my LaTeX document. I'm using the listings package, with a code sample adapted from :  \documentclass{report}  \usepackage{color} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage{listings}  \usepackage{caption} \DeclareCaptionFont{white}{\color{white}} \DeclareCaptionFormat{listing}{\colorbox{gray}{\parbox{\textwidth}{#1#2#3}}} \captionsetup[lstlisting]{format=listing,labelfont=white,textfont=white}  % This concludes the preamble  \begin{document}  \begin{lstlisting}[label=some-code,caption=Some Code]    NETWORKING=YES  HOSTNAME= f e −19. l o c a l d o m a i n  } \end{lstlisting}  \end{document}   The problem is that there is some extra space between every character when I generate a PDF. I would like the code without this space. The extra space is visible in the the part HOSTNAME=.
32995
MWE needs to be compiled with LuaTeX to reproduce the problem:  \documentclass[11pt]{report}% \usepackage{amsmath,mathtools} \usepackage{breqn}                          \begin{document} $J^{\ast} = \text{JFK} \to \text{NO} \to \text{SFO}$ \[ J^{\ast} = \text{JFK} \to \text{NO} \to \text{SFO} \] \end{document}   Gives (no compile error or any warning) the following strange output    I have to use breqn package. If I remove it, then I get the expected output    Is there a way to work around this, so I can use breqn and get correct output?  TL 2015. filelist: (compiled with lualatex)  This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.80.0.1 (TeX Live 2015) (rev 5863)   *File List*   report.cls    2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class   size11.clo    2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX file (size option)  amsmath.sty    2013/01/14 v2.14 AMS math features  amstext.sty    2000/06/29 v2.01   amsgen.sty    1999/11/30 v2.0   amsbsy.sty    1999/11/29 v1.2d   amsopn.sty    1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names mathtools.sty    2015/11/12 v1.18 mathematical typesetting tools   keyval.sty    2014/10/28 v1.15 key=value parser (DPC)     calc.sty    2014/10/28 v4.3 Infix arithmetic (KKT,FJ)  mhsetup.sty    2010/01/21 v1.2a programming setup (MH)    breqn.sty    2015/08/11 v0.98d Breaking equations    expl3.sty    2015/12/20 v6326 L3 programming layer (loader)  expl3-code.tex    2015/12/20 v6326 L3 programming layer  l3pdfmode.def    2015/11/11 v6250 L3 Experimental driver: PDF mode flexisym.sty    2015/08/11 v0.98d Make math characters macros   cmbase.sym    2007/12/19 v0.92 mathstyle.sty    2015/08/11 v0.98d Tracking mathstyle implicitly graphicx.sty    2014/10/28 v1.0g Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR) graphics.sty    2014/10/28 v1.0p Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)     trig.sty    1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC) graphics.cfg    2010/04/23 v1.9 graphics configuration of TeX Live   pdftex.def    2011/05/27 v0.06d Graphics/color for pdfTeX infwarerr.sty    2010/04/08 v1.3 Providing info/warning/error messages (HO)  ltxcmds.sty    2011/11/09 v1.22 LaTeX kernel commands for general use (HO) supp-pdf.mkii pdftexcmds.sty    2011/11/29 v0.20 Utility functions of pdfTeX for LuaTeX (HO) ifluatex.sty    2010/03/01 v1.3 Provides the ifluatex switch (HO)    ifpdf.sty    2011/01/30 v2.3 Provides the ifpdf switch (HO) luatex-loader.sty    2010/03/09 v0.4 Lua module loader (HO) epstopdf-base.sty    2010/02/09 v2.5 Base part for package epstopdf   grfext.sty    2010/08/19 v1.1 Manage graphics extensions (HO) kvdefinekeys.sty    2011/04/07 v1.3 Define keys (HO) kvoptions.sty    2011/06/30 v3.11 Key value format for package options (HO) kvsetkeys.sty    2012/04/25 v1.16 Key value parser (HO) etexcmds.sty    2011/02/16 v1.5 Avoid name clashes with e-TeX commands (HO) epstopdf-sys.cfg    2010/07/13 v1.3 Configuration of (r)epstopdf for TeX Live  ***********   Update  I found another case of duplication when using breqn, which does not involve \text at all. But the solution provided below also fixes this issue. I am adding this second case here for reference just in case it might be useful. Here is MWE  \documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{amsmath,mathtools} \usepackage{breqn} \begin{document} \[ \underset{\mathbf{S}} {\operatorname{arg\,min}}      \sum_{i=1}^{k} \sum_{\mathbf x \in S_i}       \left\| \mathbf x - \boldsymbol\mu_i \right\|^2  \] \end{document}   The output is    After adding the patch in the answer below the correct output is now given, which is
20304
I am trying to build a table inside a LaTeX 3 command. A MWE:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{xparse}  \ExplSyntaxOn \NewDocumentCommand{\createTable}{ m m }{     \begin{tabular}{|c*{#2}{|c}|}         \hline         \int_step_inline:nnnn {1} {1} {#1} {             ##1             \int_step_inline:nnnn {1} {1} {#2} {                 &amp; x             }             \\\hline         }     \end{tabular} } \ExplSyntaxOff  \begin{document}      \createTable{5}{4}  \end{document}   This gives me following ouput in which the column lines of the first column are too long:    In order to solve this problem I read questions         Though I still did not understand the actual nature of the problem (or its given solutions), I was able to reproduce the solution from .  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{xparse}  \ExplSyntaxOn \DeclareDocumentCommand{\fillRow}{ m m }{     #1     \int_step_inline:nnnn {1} {1} {#2} {     &amp; x     }     \\\hline }  \DeclareDocumentCommand{\BuildTable}{ m }{     \begin{tabular}{|c*{#1}{|c}|}     \hline }  \def\endBuildTable{     \end{tabular} } \ExplSyntaxOff  \begin{document}      \begin{BuildTable}{4}         \fillRow{1}{4}         \fillRow{2}{4}         \fillRow{3}{4}         \fillRow{4}{4}         \fillRow{5}{4}     \end{BuildTable}  \end{document}   This code outputs the desired result. But I don't like it because it needs 3 commands instead of 1 (minor issue). But most of all because of the verbose, redundant and inflexible syntax to generate the table. Therefore I decided to make an abstraction by putting the table-generating-commands in another command:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{xparse}  \ExplSyntaxOn \DeclareDocumentCommand{\fillRow}{ m m }{     #1     \int_step_inline:nnnn {1} {1} {#2} {     &amp; x     }     \\\hline }  \DeclareDocumentCommand{\BuildTable}{ m }{     \begin{tabular}{|c*{#1}{|c}|}     \hline }  \def\endBuildTable{     \end{tabular} }  \DeclareDocumentCommand{\putTogether}{ m m }{     \begin{BuildTable}{#2}         \int_step_inline:nnnn {1} {1} {#1} {             \fillRow{##1}{#2}         }     \end{BuildTable} } \ExplSyntaxOff  \begin{document}      \putTogether{5}{4}  \end{document}   But this brought me back to my original problem because the column lines of the first column are too long again.  Could anyone   explain to me what exactly is wrong with my original code; what the difference is between the second and the third code fragments; how to edit my (original) code in order to solve my problem?
21700
I am running this LaTeX file through pdflatex and getting these warnings:     latex warning: there were undefined references.   latex warning: label(s) may have changed. Rerun to get cross-reference right.   and also some more warnings like this:     latex warning: reference 'lastpage' on page 76 undefined on input line 3200.   on every page end.  My LaTeX file is like this   \documentclass[a4paper,leqno,twoside]{article}  \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{multirow}  \renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}  \usepackage{color} \usepackage[colorlinks=true]{hyperref} \usepackage{draftwatermark} \SetWatermarkText{EXPERIMENTAL}  \SetWatermarkScale{0.6}  \usepackage{parskip}   \graphicspath{{Figure/}}    \let\oldsection\section  \renewcommand{\section}{\clearpage\oldsection}   \begin{document}      % Issued by {Name, acronym, department, phone}  \issuedby{vrebwr}  % Checked by   \checkedby{-}   % Approved by  \approvedby{-}   % Document title. Use \doctitleShort{} to insert a shorter title in the header.   \doctitle{test numbers with id}   \doctitleShort{document for tests}   % Publish date  \publishdate{\today}     % Titlepage  \frontmatter % Should be on first page  \maketitle     \vspace*{08eX}   \begin{center}    \subsection*{Abstract}    \end{center}    \noindent      it contains information about tests.    \newpage     \mainmatter     % Main pages. This command should be on page 2 or later.     \phantom{phantom}    \cleardoublepage     \subsection*{Change Record}    \begin{itemize}   \item R.1: Initial version.    \begin{itemize}   \item  generation of documentation using the vrebwr     \end{itemize}    \end{itemize}      \cleardoublepage    \setcounter{tocdepth}{2}     \tableofcontents      \cleardoublepage     \section{ How to read the tset information}     \begin{enumerate}      \item information how to read     \item information of tests     \end{enumerate}      \section{test numbers}     \subsection*{1, temperature sensor. }    \addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{ 1, temperature sensor.}    \subsubsection*{data}    some data regarding test where we performed    \subsubsection*{values}    temperature sensor value here three or more.     \subsubsection*{reason}        why we get like this.      \newpage      \subsection*{2, humidity sensor. }     \addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{ 2, humidity sensor.}    \subsubsection*{data}    some data regarding test where we performed    \subsubsection*{values}    humidity sensor value here three or more.     \subsubsection*{reason}         why we get like this.    \subsection*{3, pressure sensor. }    \addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{ 3, pressure sensor.}    \subsubsection*{data}    some data regarding test where we performed    \subsubsection*{values}    pressure sensor value here three or more.    \subsubsection*{reason}      why we get like this.    \newpage   \end{document}   In the above LaTeX file I have around 100 tests. I used the * symbol to eliminate numbering in subsections, because I am using test names with number so there is no need to add numbering. It looks bad in the PDF, so I  tried to add that test name and number in table of contents by using this command:  \addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{1,temperature sensor.}   When I used this command I am getting errors like as I explained above. I searched and I found some reasons why this error occurred, because of \label{} and \ref{} is not used like that. But I don't know how to use that in my file. Can anyone help me with it?
96328
I have a LaTeX table generated like this,   \begin{table}[ht] \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrr} \hline &amp; 1 &amp; 2 &amp; 3 &amp; 4 &amp; 5 &amp; 6 \\  \hline 1 &amp; 181.21 &amp; 169.01 &amp; 130.03 &amp; 135.93 &amp; 142.31 &amp; 108.11 \\  2 &amp; 106.80 &amp; 130.71 &amp; 186.43 &amp; 126.46 &amp; 167.28 &amp; 137.91 \\  3 &amp; 162.69 &amp; 198.98 &amp; 188.33 &amp; 184.30 &amp; 147.02 &amp; 197.38 \\  4 &amp; 132.42 &amp; 150.50 &amp; 148.69 &amp; 134.31 &amp; 129.52 &amp; 172.72 \\  \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}   but when i compile it in MiKTeX I am getting the following error   ! Undefined control sequence. l.1 \begin           {table}[ht] ?  Process interrupted by user   I want a table generated from this i am compiling under pdfTeX. I am using LaTeX for first time, can anyone please give a suggestion?
70730
I get this error message, during compiling my .tex-document.  line 234 - ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char ́ (U+301)(inputenc) not set up for use with LaTeX.See the inputenc package documentation for explanation.Type H &lt;return&gt; for immediate help.... \cleardoublepage   I am writing my thesis right now and I am very confused about this error message, since it seems to be connected to a special character, which I do not use in my manuscript. The solution up to now was the reloading of an older version of my manuscript...after some hours of work and after several times of successful compiling this error suddenly occurs again. I don't get it why, since I just write some text, add some figures and nothing more...  any suggestions, how I can solve that issue? I have no idea, what kind of MWE I should post here :( where does this comment "line234" refer to. Line 234 is normal text in my manuscript...
76848
I switched from Windows 7 to Ubuntu 14.04. The following code was producing this .  \documentclass[oneside,english,a4paper, 12pt]{book} \usepackage{a4wide, fullpage, color, fancyhdr, lastpage, changepage, multirow, calligra, graphicx}     \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{geometry} \geometry{verbose,tmargin=2cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin=2cm}  \makeatletter \let\ps@plain\ps@fancy% Plain page style = fancy page style \makeatother  \providecommand*{\wb}[2]{\fontsize{#1}{#2}\usefont{U}{webo}{xl}{n}} \newcommand*{\cdiam}{\prec\kern-2pt\succ} \IfFileExists{upquote.sty}{\usepackage{upquote}}{}  \begin{document} \begin{titlepage} \fontfamily{pbk}\selectfont   \begin{adjustwidth*}{1.5cm}{2cm}     \vspace*{4.5\baselineskip}     \centering     \begin{picture}(600, 0)       \multiput(0, 110)(20, 0){20}{{\wb{10}{12}4}}                    % Top Line       \multiput(-5, 90)(0,-21){35}{\rotatebox{90}{{\wb{10}{12}4}}}    % Left Line       \multiput(0,-630)(20, 0){20}{{\wb{10}{12}4}}                    % Bottom Line       \multiput(400,90)(0,-21){35}{\rotatebox{90}{{\wb{10}{12}4}}}    % Right Line     \end{picture}     \end{adjustwidth*}     \end{titlepage} \end{document}   But now on Ubuntu 14.04 I'm getting output with the border shows up as a string of the number 4. I would highly appreciate if someone guide me how to install the required fonts. Thanks
41095
How do I create something like this without getting any errors?  \begin{thm}[\cite[page 10]{ABC2011}] ... \end{thm}   I tried putting various things into {...} brackets, but not eliminating any errors. I probably have misunderstood something about how LaTeX works in the background and the AMS packet:  \usepackage[amsmath,thmmarks]{ntheorem}
92267
I am new to latex.  I am trying to compile someone else's document.  I have all the correct packages installed, but I get the following error:  *Overfull \hbox &lt;37.8394pt too wide&gt; in paragraph at lines 26-37   [][]   ! Missing $ inserted   &lt;inserted text&gt;   1.39 Lines 14, 15 in vc_                             value are bottleneck   ?*     Here are the lines that are referenced in the error message.  I understand that one of the lines is too long, but I'm not sure about how to fix it.  Thanks a lot for your help.  \begin{table*}[h] \caption{Functions} \begin{tabular}{lll}  Name &amp; Description &amp; Potential  \\ \hline  \texttt{c\_w.m} &amp;  gives relationship between $W$ and $C$  \\  \texttt{compute\_pi\_min} &amp;  Compute $\pi_{min}$ &amp; gradient  \\  \textbf{\texttt{criterion.m}} &amp;  Compute RSS; steps 1-10(?)  \\  \texttt{irr\_equation.m} &amp; no idea\dots &amp; none  \\  \texttt{pi\_min\_equation.m} &amp;  uses \texttt{vc\_value.m} &amp; none  \\  \texttt{pi\_min\_equation\_solo.m} &amp;  computes optimal value of solo project &amp;          quadrature  \\  \texttt{solo\_value.m} &amp;  computes optimal value of solo project &amp; quadrature  \\  \texttt{vc\_value.m} &amp;  computes optimal value of a project to VC &amp; quadrature \\  \end{tabular}  \end{table*}  Lines 19, 44, 45 are bottlenecks in criterion.m -- criterion.m takes 75 percent of   time\\  Lines 14, 15 in vc_value are bottlenecks