I am using the glossary package.  I want to include terms in the glossary that are not referred to in the text.  That sounds weird, but it's not --- the terms are actually included in a figure, and I don't intend to write about them in the body of the text, but rather refer my reader to the glossary.  How can I force the inclusion of a term in the glossary without using the \gls command or otherwise referencing the term in the text. I took a look at the manual but it was not clear to me how to accomplish this even in light of that info.  thanks
36245
Is there a command so that the glossary will also display elements without links (an equivalent of \nocite in BibTeX)?
111261
Possible Duplicate:             I'm using the package hyperref. When referencing my figure, I currently use code like  Figure \ref{fig:chorus-overview} gives an overview of the basic concept.   because \ref will just yield a single integer 1, as opposed to Figure 1.  However, the word Figure is auto-generated for the figure environment caption, so when using a package such as [ngerman]{babel}, it's Abbildung instead, and I need to fix the text before my reference.  Is there any way to directly get the Figure 1 text via \ref or a similar command?  EDIT  Additionally to the steps described in Sveinung's answer (using \autoref from hyperref or \cref from cleveref), I needed to make sure to place the label before the caption in the figure environment, as pointed out by Werner, and to include babel before hyperref/cleveref.  \nameref does not do what I need, since it copies the text of the caption instead.
19278
I am trying to use the approach given in the solution here  (which looks really neat) for an application where i am having more than one glossary; in the original i have only a symbolslist and abbreviations, but here's an mwe adapting the symbolslist to the main list provided in the solution of the link above  \documentclass{scrbook} % \usepackage[acronym,toc]{glossaries} %this line is new \newglossary[slg]{symbolslist}{syi}{syg}{List of Symbols} \makeglossaries \glsnoexpandfields  \newcommand*{\glsarg}{i}  \newglossaryentry{BetragVektor}{      name=\ensuremath{|\overline{u_i}|},      text=|\overline{u_{\glsarg}}|,     description={ABC}} \newglossaryentry{s:tP}{     name=\ensuremath{T_p\mathcal M},     text=T_\glsarg\mathcal M,     description={},     type=symbolslist %in own list } % modify the entry's format  \defglsentryfmt{%   \let\orgglsarg\glsarg   \ifdefempty\glsinsert   {}%   {%     \let\glsarg\glsinsert     \let\glsinsert\relax   }%   \glsgenentryfmt   \let\glsarg\orgglsarg }  \begin{document}  $\gls{BetragVektor}[1]$  $\gls{BetragVektor}$  $\gls{BetragVektor}[1]$  $\gls{BetragVektor}[2]$  $\gls{BetragVektor}[]$  $\gls{s:tP}[1]$  $\gls{s:tP}$  $\gls{s:tP}[1]$  $\gls{s:tP}[2]$  $\gls{s:tP}[]$  \printglossaries \end{document}   As mentioned, the only thing new is that I introduce a second list. The solution still seems to work for the main list as the result shows.    So somehow the new argument gets added in the and and \glsarg stays the same. How can I solve this, such that my new glossary also can have optional parameters on their entries?
15327
The title is pretty much I want to ask. More detail, the nomenclature entries should be sorted in groups like:   Nomenclature     Acronyms     Symbol  Description     % no Dimensions and Units      ...     Greek Symbols     Symbol  Description             Dimensions     Units     ...     Roman Symbols     Symbol  Description             Dimensions     Units     S       Surface area vector     L^2            m^2     ...    Superscripts     Symbol  Description     % no Dimensions and Units      ...    Dimensionless Numbers     Symbol  Description     Definition     ...   e.g. expected entries like this:       My current nomenclature settings for grouping [book class]:  %---------------------------------------------------------- %                        Nomenclature %---------------------------------------------------------- %\renewcommand{\nomname}{List of Symbols and Abbrev.} \renewcommand\nomgroup[1]{%   \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{A}}{%    \item[\textbf{Acronyms}] }{%                  A - Acronyms     \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{R}}{%      \item[\textbf{Roman Symbols}]}{%            R - Roman       \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{G}}{%         \item[\textbf{•} Symbols }]}{%          G - Greek           \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{S}}{%            \item[\textbf{Superscripts  }]}{{%          S - Superscripts         \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{U}}{%          \item[\textbf{Subscripts }]}{{%                 U - Subscripts         \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{X}}{%          \item[\textbf{Other Symbols }]}%            X - Other Symbols                     {{}}}}}}}}}} %\ifpdf \renewcommand{\nomlabel}[1]{\hspace{1 em}#1}%{\hspace{1.5 em}#1} \renewcommand*{\nompreamble}{\markboth{\nomname}{\nomname}}   But how to extend it with Dimensions and Units?
49401
My problem is that I have only one reference. So I would like the head of this part to appear "Reference" instead of commonly "References". More generally, could we change the title "References" to an arbitrary name?  Thank you very much for your help!
89333
I am not sure if I am using the right wording in title. Basically what I need is to add the following source using the listing package.  In preamble:  \usepackage{listings}   then and is here when I have the problem:  \begin{lstlisting}      \begin{lstlisting}      \end{lstlisting}  \end{lstlisting}   but I am getting Package Listings Error: Extra \endlstlisting.  How can I "mask" the first \end{lstlisting}? I've been through the documentation but I am lost.
882
I am using the 'article' class, 'figure' environment.  My captions are divided in two parts:   the information about the figure the credits of the figure (for which I use \textfff{})   In my list of figures, I would like to omit the second part. Would you have a solution, please?
4945
I have used the package nomencl. In my code I have incorporated the \nomenclature as well. But when I compile, it is not showing me any results. My code is :  \documentclass[pdftex,12pt,a4paper]{report} \usepackage{nomencl} \makenomenclature \begin{document} ---page numbering and other things included----- \include{symbols} -----others--- \end{document}   symbols.tex  \chapter*{NOTATIONS} \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Notations} \nomenclature{$G_e$}{Equivalent Shear Modulus} \printnomenclature   Shall I use \nomenclature while explaining the chapter. Will It give me the same results? like  \documentclass[pdftex,12pt,a4paper]{report} \usepackage{nomencl} \makenomenclature \begin{document} ---page numbering and other things included----- \include{symbols} \include{chap3-calculate_w} -----others--- \end{document}   symbols.tex  \chapter*{NOTATIONS} \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Notations} \printnomenclature   chap3-calculate_w.tex  \chapter{SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED GRANULAR FILL SOFT SOIL} \label{chap:W} \section{INTRODUCTION} In this thesis, the methodology to determine an  Equivalent single layer shear modulus \nomenclature{$G_e$}{Equivalent Shear Modulus},$G_e$ value for a...etc   I am not getting the output in both these. Can someone help me with this?
10835
Is there any way to have BibTeX or biblatex insert a bibliography without having citations in the body of the document itself? Maybe a way to hide the in-text citations, so that BibTeX still sees them and includes them in the bibliography, but does not print them in the body?
63871
I am using gb4e for my examples. I can insert footnote in the \ex line, like this:  \begin{exe} \ex It's ok\footnote{no problem}. \end{exe}   But I cannot insert footnote in the \gll line, like this:  \begin{exe} \ex It's ok. \gll C'est parfait\footnote{no problem}\\ Ce est parfait\\ \end{exe}   When I put the \footnote{} in \gll line, it does not compile.  How can I insert footnote in the gloss line? Thank you very much for your help!
100154
So I know one of hyperref's features is that it can add metadata to you PDFs. This is a nice feature and if you're putting stuff online, it's good to include metadata.  But is the hyperref package really the best way to do it? I mean, if you're using hyperref anyway, that's fine. But if you don't want hyperrefs in your document, it seems weird to include the package, and then turn off pretty much all its functionality. And given that hyperref is a shorthand for "package conflict nightmare", is seems insane that you should have to deal with it just for the sake of some metadata.  So I have two questions.   Is there a good reason that hyperref includes this functionality which is apparently unrelated to its primary purpose? Is there a better (smaller, less conflicty, easier...) option to include metadata in my PDFs?
123682
How can I add a source to a figure? I need to add \ref, \cite or just free text. Something like that: \begin{figure} [ht]   \centering   \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{res/figure.pdf}     \caption{Caption}     \source{\ref{},\cite{} or free Text}   \label{fig:gliederung} \end{figure}  Should give me:  The source shouldn't appear in \listoffigures.
95373
How can a figure be forced to appear alone on a separate page?  \begin{figure}[p!] forces it to a separate page, but it does not guarantee that some other small figures (which I'd like to be included inline in the text) will not accidentally end up on the same figure page.
33343
By default, the glossaries package creates a link to the glossary for each occurrence of an entry (e.g. each time I use \gls{entry}). With the links visualized (e.g. using hyperref colorlinks). This becomes really cluttered if an entry is used many times.  I would rather prefer that only the first occurrence of an entry is hyperlinked. Is this possible?
47489
Possible Duplicate:          When I add a piece of code of figure insertion to the context I'm faced with a problem: a number of irrelevant words appear.    Code:  \begin{figure}     \centering         \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{C:/Thesis/Latex/thesis_1(1)/Pictures/study area.jpg}         \rule{35em}{0.3pt}     \caption{The Grand St. Bernard wireless sensor network deployment (a) the coordinates of nodes according to the Swiss coordinate system (b) the distribution of the nodes in the study site \citep{r33}}     \label{fig:study area} \end{figure}   Problem:
1863
I have a paper where all equations are numbered, but I want to number equations only if they are actually referred to in the .tex file using \ref{}. How can I make that happen? Alternatively, how can I make all equations that have no \label next to them (because then I know I don't refer to them) not have a number? Do I have to use \nonumber separately for each such equation?
76594
I am writing a report that has graphics, photos and maps. If I use the figure environment everything is labeled as a figure in the caption. However, what I would like to do is where I have a map to have the map labeled appropriately e.g. Map 1: caption text; Map 2: caption text etc and to be able to refer to it in the text Map \ref{map01}. Same as for Photographs.   I have looked at some of the FAQs but does not seem to have what I want.  Is it possible.