Hi I'd like to know why the number next to the review link on top of the website page always indicate the number of available suggested edits and not the number of all the review tasks available. I doubt StackOverflow is a bugged website so my guess would be that there must be a reason for it. However I can't make myself a reason why it would still show up the available suggested edits when I reviewed my daily 20. Why for instance it is not showing me the number of available late answers to review, since it is most of the time 0 I think that would be useful.
35566
Since a , I see more than I should:    I see no reason to see 134 posts are awaiting review, when there is literally nothing I can do about them. I think it is a bug, because notification is meant as something that will make me act. When I know I usually can't, obviously I will start to ignore it.  If it's not a bug, please remove bug tag and explain how it is supposed to be useful, or how can I switch to only seeing notifications about things I can act on.  Note that apaprently there are no flags for me, neither. I see only stats, migrated, close, delete, there, as if there was no flags waiting:    If you expect us to click on it every few minutes  just to see personalized numbers next to queues, why don't you simply query for personalized numbers every few minutes and cache them for us? It should cost you similar, in database usage, and will save us a lot of clicking and frustration.  If all this number means is "there might be reviews, or not" or "for sure there are none"  it would be simpler just to hide "review" link in the second case. We don't need two links with the same function next to each other, thank you, one is enough, and meaningless numbers are only irritating.
90634
I'm blocked from reviewing for some time, but I'm not blocked from editing. I would like to edit someone's question, but there is another suggested edit review pending. I can't approve it because of the review ban, but also I can't do any other edit as when I click "edit" it redirects me to approve the edit. Is that expected or this is a bug?
40059
While perusing a question on Stack Overflow, I was presented with the familiar "X new answer to this question, click to refresh". When I did, I was presented with the following:    This pattern continued with "4 new answers" and "5 new answers", at which point I got bored watching it and came here to report it.  FWIW, the correct number of answers was displayed when I did an F5 on it.
35239
I'm curious how it is decided how many comments to display before the "Show more comments" link. Sometimes I see a dozen comments on a question and no "Show more comments" link, in other occasions no comments are visible at all, only the link.
82557
I've been avidly checking the review page on StackOverflow, and I am a little curious as to how posts are allocated to reviewers.  Obviously, being a relatively new member, I only have access to new post and late answer reviews.  The queue is usually empty for me, but then I will notice some new questions from apparently first time posters on the new questions page. Also, while sometimes 2 questions are in the queue, it often says I am finished after completing one review.  Could anyone elaborate on how the system distributes reviews?
33234
on an answer deleted as rude/abusive is visible, even without logging in (and for users with less than 10k reputation). These users can't see the answer , via the , or a direct link to the .    This is a potential avenue for spammers, just like the suggested edit spam used to be, but is ; according to the :     In addition, in order to reduce the incentive for spammers to make spam edits that get rejected, suggested edit spam is hidden from logged-out users, so they can't show their clients public-facing pages with spam (so they won't get paid).   For this to work, the spammer would need two accounts, one to post the spam and a second one to suggest an edit. Even if the spam post is quickly nuked, the review link will be active forever. One could argue that logged-in users without 10k reputation shouldn't be able to see the suggested edits either; I'm partial to that.
52101
W.K.T, any user(with more than 2k rep) can review 20 suggested edits per day.  Today I saw the newly appointed moderator  reviewed more than 20.    Is it possible for moderators to review more than the daily limited count?  If yes, can any moderators can do it at any time?  I didn't see this before.
61604
I am a little puzzled over this subject. Why does the number of items in the  is always increasing?  Compared to "suggested edits" - there are fewer items in the close votes queue (less than a 1M  close items vs. over 2M  items in the suggested edits).  So why can't we handle the closed votes reviews?  My observation: While reviewing a suggested edit does not require specific understanding of the post itself (a good assesment can be made based on style and formating), this is not the case for close votes: these reviews require an understanding of the post's subject.  My proposal: It would be nice if when I go to review closed votes the system will automatically filter the posts for me based on my active tags. This way I will be more efficient in reviewing and more encouraged to review more.  EDIT: An after thought (after reading proposed answer and comments): It might be that filtering is not exactly what is required, but rather prioritizing the queue per reiviewer. Each reiviewer will be given posts to review that are "similar" to his active badges with higher probability.  Update: Following , I believe it is highly important to have no backlog at the close votes reviews: This backlog actually makes closing questions on SO quite a random event, leaving many low-quality questions open spamming SO. Is there an effective way to draw the attention of SE team/moderators to this burning issue?
57247
Clicking the orange review counter used to take me right to suggested edits. As of sometime in the past couple days, it started showing the total number of waiting reviews (not just edits), and leading to /review.  When was this changed, and why? It's not on
44960
I was reviewing a post in the First Posts Queue when I came across a question I wanted to answer, for reference the question I am talking about is linked this one:    I noticed some easy edits that would make it look nice however when I clicked the edit button nothing happened (as if the edit link was dead).  I opened the question in a normal link and the warning regarding an edit is curently waiting popped up:    I would imagine that in the a review queue if someone tries to edit a question (as they would in a normal question) this warning should also pop up but it did not for me.  Is this a bug?
120913
When reviewing the First Posts (and Late Answers) review queue, after you suggest an edit, you're back in the review queue and the I'm Done button is activated. So far, so good, but when I realize I want to edit something else as well (I often forget the tags), I can click the 'edit' link again. When I'm done improving my suggested edit, I'm suddenly outside the review queue.    This does not happen if you have enough reputation (2k) to edit posts straight away; then you always stay in the review queue.
48815
Your summary page shows "N Edits to your posts" for the selected time period but you really have to be looking for it.  Could we add edits to the notification feed? You could put the reason for the edit (entered--or not--when the editor changes it) and just a link to the post.
39905
When I look at my reputation on stackoverflow I see one number, but when I look at my profile in the careers.stackoverflow I see another number.  Is it just slow to update (maybe it's a few days behind...)?  UPDATE:  Looks like this problem has been solved.  As of 5-28-14 my reputation levels in stackoverflow and careers.stackoverflow are now consistent.  Thanks to those doing the fixing!
70770
This confusion came up in comments .  On the site I use most actively (RPG.SE), I've noticed that the counts for each review queue appear to only indicate the reviews available to me requiring my action. Just to be clear, I'm talking about this number here:        Since I'm a 10k user, that's pretty easy to tell: even after doing all my reviews, and the review page saying there's 0 items in each queue, I might still have that 10k notice in my top bar saying there's [5] reviews pending, or some other number. So they must still be there, just waiting on other users to finish them, and it just doesn't show them to me. This is fine, I like this behaviour.  However, on Meta SE about an hour ago, there was 1 item in the close vote review queue. I reviewed that item. The count stayed at 1 on the review page. When I clicked to re-enter the queue in case there were new items, I was presented with this:        Another user in that meta question I linked claims this is normal behaviour for them on their own site (Christianity.SE I think?).  What's going on here? Are the review queues supposed to be customised just to what I personally can actually review at the time? Is there a bug, are sites customised differently, or is there just some kind of caching thing leading to a time delay on the review count getting updated? (As they say, it is always caching, but is caching really the culprit here too?)
66260
I see a "review" link on the top of the page, which takes me to a few "review queues".   What is a "review queue"? What are the various queues for? What can I do in each queue?
124055
On the "Questions" page of each Stack Exchange site, there are links at the top to sort the questions by "newest", "frequent", "votes", "active", and "unanswered".  At least that is what it looks like if I am logged in. If I am on a site that I don't have an account for, or if I am not logged in, the only one I see is "newest".  This seems to have been done recently. I could swear I saw the other links, even when I was not logged in, until a few weeks ago, or maybe later than that.  Why was this change made?
62173
I only see this on sites where I don't have edit privileges, and only where there have been multiple revisions:        What exactly is this supposed to do?  Intuitively, I would expect it to change the text in the box to what it was at that revision, but it doesn't. And, if that's it, why only where I need to suggest edits?