I saw many questions on MSE which are under  tag and having many upvotes. Many times moderators and 10k+ users approve it as bug. And Many time people reports same bugs under different title and descriptions. Many sites provides bug reporting feature and it's status(familiar site facebook).  So same questions can be deleted or closed immediately.   Does MSE provides which bugs are approved and will be solved? Which bugs are solved until now?   You can see many bugs at
12982
Meta Stack Exchange seems to have different rules and user behavior than the "regular" Stack Exchange sites.  How is it different?    Individual questions answered below:                Related
65163
I was browsing through some StackOverflow posts, and I noticed that often, comments had small bug fixes indirectly unrelated to the question. However, in some of these cases, the small bug that the commenter thought had nothing to do with the question turns out to be the right answer. My question is: When you have a tiny bug fix that you are not sure will fix the problem, do you put it in a comment or do you answer the question.
47474
(probably soon to be deleted) made me wonder what would be the right way to handle surveys like that:     I'm doing a worker interview for High School and I want to be a computer programmer.      What is your job title?   What is your work history?   ...   What are the duties of a beginner?   Where is work available?     To me it feels like spam but checking the  makes me doubt that it really qualifies. I find it somewhat difficult to state that questions like in above example advertise something:     A post should be marked as spam ONLY when it contains an ...   If there was a link to a survey off-site (like in most similar questions I've seen so far) I would easily flag it as spam. But this one didn't have link, it expected answers right there, on our site, making it hard to say what exactly is advertised. Or it would be correct to say something like asker advertises their survey?  Another option I considered was flagging for moderator attention. But I can't come up with compelling flag message that would justify mod involvement assuming that question can be closed with 3K users votes.  That leaves the only option to handle such questions - vote to close, correct? (At sites where I'm active such questions are blatant off-topic; maybe this is so network wide but I am not sure).
14280
Someone voted to close my question as a duplicate. I agreed, so I cast my close vote (I have enough reputation to vote to close).  . So I expected this to happen.  But it didn't. This confused me — is this not a question I asked after all? No, it is. Maybe I need to reload the page? Nope, the question still isn't closed. Is the asker confirmation feature broken? Well, there's the “This question may already have an answer here” banner at the top. What if I click “That solved my problem!”? Ah, that does close the question.  It turns out that only clicking “That solved my problem!” instantly closes the question. Casting a close vote has a different effect, it's just an ordinary close vote.  Please make casting a close vote equivalent to clicking “That solved my problem!”.
35620
I have  today and one member was voted as duplicate and private feedback was there, I choose no and submitted the form. When I revisit the question or refresh the page same notice reappears with yes/no options.  In-network tab I got 200 OK status and response as "success":true  Environment: OS: Windows 10 Browser: Chrome 79.0.3945.117 (Official Build) (64-bit)  From the comments, the same issue is happing with   (might be with whole StackExchange network)      From network tab
67535
I am requesting for a new flag so that we can immediately flag questions in which people are asking for help on a problem from an ongoing contest, and if there is anything related to code or the algorithm in that question, it is deleted permanently from the view of others.  I am asking for this because I have seen a few questions, in which the OP was asking us to help fix their code on Stack Overflow. The Code they posted was from an ongoing contest on , and that would be considered cheating.  On codechef, we are told to not share anything from code, algorithm, or anything related to a problem from an ongoing contest, but since users are unable to ask their questions there, they come to Stack Overflow and ask it there.  Up till now, when I encounter questions like that, I flag them for moderator attention explaining the reason ( I don't have enough reputation to vote to close ).   I have not been a user on SO for long, but I have met a few questions like this already. This is one  . It's already deleted, but I think there should be a quick way to flag it so that it is brought to the notice of moderators quickly so that the code is not leaked. ( I don't want to increase the Work load on moderators, but something similar would be useful ).  So I request a new flag so that these questions can be flagged quickly to prevent the leaking of code and also make it easier, rather than having to type a good reason and wait for a moderator to accept it.  Please forgive me If this is a Duplicate as I could not find anything related to this on MSE yet.
2396
I'm not too familiar with status-tracking in general, but it seems tags exist to cover all states of these questions: -deferred, -bydesign, -planned, -declined, -completed, -review; -norepro, -reproduced.  Yet not every feature-request or bug question has one of these collectively inclusive tags.    So... why not?  Is it just a matter of convenience?  What does the default state of having no status tag mean?  That it is just a bad question?  Or that there's no consensus yet?
77449
Megan has written a .  I've seen a bunch of discussion about it on chat - but it feels like having it purely on the blog is a little clunky.  So specifically - what does the MSE community feel about the proposed post notices for closed questions? What's missing, or what should be added? What are some of the lessons we've learnt that could be helpful here?
36185
Please have a look at . When the question was asked by the OP, it had a scope related problem in the code snippet posted in it. 2 answers were posted for that question. But after the answers were posted, a friend of mine from Stack Overflow, edited the question(not sure with what intention) in such a way that the bug in the code was gone(it actually self answered the question). Please have a look at the question revision history, where I've rolled back the question to the original state, which has the problem in place.  My question is that, should such a practice be allowed/encouraged that an edit to a question renders all the answers posted for that question, totally irrelevant? As anybody who comes to have a look at the question later, will be highly confused as to why a question was asked without any problem and there were so many answers posted to it(not everybody cares to go through the revision history)? I happened to notice that, but not everybody would notice it.
66795
In several scenarios, including two today ( and ), we have had bugs set to  simply because the fix has been checked in. Just because the code portion has been completed does not mean the work is done, and this can be confusing for users who come across the same problem. Until then it really is  or maybe a tag that doesn't yet exist (status-checked-in?).  Particularly in times like this week, where the stability of the system is a priority, I don't think this status should be set merely because the code has been checked in - it should happen when the code is actually deployed and verified. Currently the devs are being very good about telling us that the code is done but they're not sure when it will be deployed, but I think that is because of the stability issue.
121931
The close and delete tabs of the  can get fairly cluttered, even here on MSO; I imagine it's ten times worse on SO. Could the page be modified to indicate which question(s) you've already voted to close or delete?
34750
Have a look at  which was suggested by . He suggested  tag. I approved because I can see he is an SE employee. So I have two doubts:   Why doesn't he have some required privileges? (as he is suggesting instead of direct editing) If he doesn't have required privileges, how can a normal user suggest an edit for  tags?   Is there any special case here? Just curious to know.
55921
Another meta question identified a bug that was marked as designed. To summarize the bug, the little number that appears next the Review link in the header shows an incorrect value most of the time.         I would like to propose that the feature be dropped. Honestly, I would prefer it be fixed, but the response to the question above gives me little faith that it will be. Half of the time, I click that little brown box and find out that I was lied to. There's nothing to review.  The little number no longer does the job it was created to do.        Oh sweet! Three things I can review!        Just kidding...
99586
There's a great thing, stack exchange application (I'm using it's version for iOS). However, it has bugs so I want to know - is it correct to create threads for bug-reports on meta site? SE application isn't part of web-environment, so I doubt. Same question about feature-requests.   If it's not a good idea to create bug reports/feature requests for SE application here, then where that should be asked?
62714
Check out ; my name appears twice. I voted to close before made moderator pro tempore, and again afterwards, and my name appears in the list twice because of that. It's a very minor bug which admittedly will happen pretty rarely, but it should at least be on the bug report list.
86131
I posted a bug just now () and then I guess I encountered another one.  Usually, after someone else answered my question, the SE would send me a notification.  about 8 mins ago, a nice guy answered one of my questions on ELL (). I haven't received that notation since.   On the other hand, I did receive other notifications, which are for some comments on the bugged question and another question.
109980
I am, apparently, one of 12 people with the gold tag badge for feature-request and one of 39 people with the gold tag badge for discussion here on meta.se.  I hadn't realized this until I cast a close as duplicate vote, then was shocked (and awed) by the power unleashed. Unicorns came from everywhere and swept the question off into duplicate land so fast I was left breathless!  While I certainly don't mind thinking of myself as a feature request or discussion expert, given that you have to tag every question with at least one of the four tags, bug, feature-request, discussion, support then being an expert in these tags may not mean as much, since they are so general and prevalent. Other gold tag badges would indicate expertise in a specific area, such as badges, or chat, but the required tags are fairly non-specific.  There are only 76 people with , so it's probably not a problem to be fixed immediately, and I'll just have to be more thoughtful about my dupe closing here on meta, but consider removing required tags from these new powers on sites where specific tags are required.