After using Firefox Quantum 66 for several months with a set of extensions, I started it today and found, that all of them have been moved to the "legacy extensions" section and disabled. The version of FF has not changed (major, minor - still the same). The versions of the addons have not changed. Updates have been disabled on the hardware level (yes, this is a highly customized device, there is nothing anyone can do about it).  They refuse to update as "download failed"  They refuse to install the latest version from file as "your extension is corrupt"  All I want is my extensions back and no one tamper with them.
87299
All of my Firefox extensions were spontaneously and simultaneously disabled (converted to Legacy status) a few moments ago.  How can I re-enable them? Firefox 66.0.3 (64-bit)
16424
I have a specific requirement (probably silly!) for testing a browser of Chrome. I realize this requirement isn't the most logical, but politics being what they may I'd like to know the technical workaround.  I need to test a site in version, let's say, 28 of Google Chrome. Obviously Google runs a silent updater which can be disabled, but at this point they don't (to my knowledge) release old archives of the MSI installers (which I can easily use to reinstall and force a no-update option for testing). If we can get this working on a single instance then there's a possibility that a virtual machine or some other workaround will give us an easy restore point to meet this test.  If anyone has a good idea of where to start here that would be amazing.  I've already floated the "why are we doing this question?" and the answer is that it is part of the requirements so we need to make a best effort.  UPDATE:   FileHippo appears to only archive the online installer (automatic update)  OldApps doesn't archive Chrome anymore  OldVersion doesn't appear to have any Chrome Archives   UPDATE 2:  - The accepted answer's server is the correct solution here at this point in time. Basically speaking you're looking for the full install (30 or so MB). If you have an 800K file it is the online installer which automatically updates.
65330
I'm trying to find a copy of 6.20 to run a diff on a client's Drupal install. I believe there's been changes to core.   How can I get version 6.20? Additionally, how can I download any older Drupal versions?
35582
Is there any way to disable core and plugin updates? I am modifying a plugin and bit of WordPress Core (I know its a sin to do so), but can't help it.
56211
Since when going after the road-map, firefox 57 will be released on 14.11.207.   Now my problem is that I use a whole lot of legacy add-ons I want to keep working with.   So how can I prevent firefox from updating via the repositories?
116609
From the usability point of view, I do not understand why on each release upgrade you have to manually patch all the URLs of apt in order to make them point to the newer distribution.  Why is not possible for apt to auto-detect the current and use it, so when you upgrade there is no need to upgrade the urls anymore?
78409
I am running the latest version of Google Chrome 23.0.1271.97 (Official Build 171054) m on Windows 7. Any new extension I install simply disappears (not disabled, total disappearance) once I close and re-start Google Chrome. This is not happening to any of my old extensions; they stay there across Chrome re-starts.  I tried everything Google Help suggested:   I created new user profile by renaming the Defaults folder I checked for any permission change that the extensions might have undergone. This is not the case. I am not running in developer mode.   This happens when I close all instances of Google Chrome. Even if one instance of Chrome is running, this doesn't happen. But I can't have an instance of Google Chrome always running.  I even reported the issue to Google Chrome team to no avail and  is offline. And I skimmed through many threads opened for the same issue only to find souls like me. Stack Exchange is my last resort.
99200
Trying to keep track of the updates to all the great, user-developed add-ons is fairly frustrating (at least for me). Is there currently a centralized resource where all these amazing add-ons are kept and updated in one location?  If there isn't such a resource, would it be possible to have blender query the collection of installed add-ins and then iterate through on-line references looking at version #'s for add-ins?  Since, as far as I know, it hasn't been done...I have to ask if there are any major flaws in the concept. Of course, in my dream scenario, there would be a "voting" front-end that would allow users to see what the most popular and useful add-ons are and where you don't have to read pages (and pages) of threads.
65679
Fifteen days ago, it was suddenly announced that .  The change took immediate and retroactive effect and is still in place.  However, .  To date, there has been no further engagement from Stack Exchange, Inc. on this subject, and consequently there is no indication as to whether these concerns are being considered.  Due to the legal nature of the issue I would understand if Stack Exchange, Inc. has opted to consult their legal partners before making any further statements on the topic.  If that is the case, I respectfully suggest that (at the very least) a short statement to that effect would be in order, as it has already been more than two weeks that the content has been [potentially illegally] re-licensed network-wide. Every day that this is the case, more content is posted, and if indeed the re-licensing of older content is ultimately deemed non-compliant, the technical can of worms involved in remedying the situation grows in mass and squirmishness.  If it is not the case, are there any plans to revisit this topic and feed back to the community as to what the next steps may be to resolve this dispute?  If there are no such plans, please consider that this is not just bikeshedding or whining or complaining or trolling. Licensing of our content, which to a large degree is the Stack Exchange Network, is a serious issue and deserves to be treated seriously.  And, if Stack Exchange, Inc. deems the concerns to be without merit, will we hear a confirmation of that so that we can proceed on that basis?
29995
This  asks how to install FF32 bit while keeping the 64 bit.  I want the much more simple thing: is there a canonical way to install firefox 52 ESR as "default" firefox in my 16.04?  I found this  ... but there are no packages; probably no wonder given the fact that the linked blog article dates back to 2012.  So, 2017, Ubuntu 16.04; how to install FF 52 ESR (as I simply need the java plugin to work for me).  ( my current solution: I downloaded the TAR file from mozilla, extracted that to /opt; and then changed /usr/bin/firefox to be a link to that ESR version of firefox. works, but ugly )
48345
Self descript. I know it's already been asked  and . But apparently it's still an issue. This only started happening to me this week that I've noticed. Per the comments in the linked answer, a hard refresh should fix it but alas, it does not. Firefox 57.0. Works on SE but doesn't work on SO or many of the other sites I visit.   I disabled my add-ons and did a hard refresh but still to no avail. I've exited my browser cleared my temp stuffs as well.
98260
I'd like a program which could zip up all of my addons in firefox so i can just move it to a new computer and walah install the same extensions/addons with one click. i know this is already developed because i've used it before however i can't remember the name to it.  thanks for the help!
101355
How do I get more information why a specific extension is not working and showing me "Error loading extension" when trying to enable it?
104530
On Ubuntu, When trying to open Firefox it is saying that it is already running but not responding. I am on a system where I dont have access to view the root.  I have had this issue before and fixed it but I dont remember how. I know before I had to delete a file but I dont remember what or where.
109700
I wish to review my Firefox Extensions, specifically I want to know the date when I installed all my extensions. Is this possible?  I know about  support article but it's not helpful.  And I know about about:addons
12222
Confronted with  I found that I need to run a version of Chromium that is newer then the one in the repositories in order to use an extension that I want.  Can I get a such new, even latest version?  In Windows I can use beta Chromium portable that is newer than Google Chrome.  How to get that newest Chromium here in Ubuntu?   Related:
101037
There has been a  about this and the accepted and high voted answer was not to merge. Still the merge was done [status-completed].  A     about this issue because this merge is simple wrong.  It is like merging Chrome into Webkit.  Yes, there has been confusion about the two names when Cordova was new but this .  So please stop this merge.