So, I wrote a review for an app. Both positive and negative thoughts in it, then I refreshed it and its not there. Help? Do I need a review account because all the people who review have some kind of username.
8680
I have an app that's been out for a couple of weeks. Its not exactly selling like hot cakes yet, but I'm pretty sure I've gotten a rating or a review by now. But nothing shows when viewing either in iTunes or directly on the AppStore on the iPhone.  Is there a standard delay as to when ratings/reviews show up, that Apple imposes, especially for new apps? Or do you think there is some problem with Apple's system?
55921
Another meta question identified a bug that was marked as designed. To summarize the bug, the little number that appears next the Review link in the header shows an incorrect value most of the time.         I would like to propose that the feature be dropped. Honestly, I would prefer it be fixed, but the response to the question above gives me little faith that it will be. Half of the time, I click that little brown box and find out that I was lied to. There's nothing to review.  The little number no longer does the job it was created to do.        Oh sweet! Three things I can review!        Just kidding...
4124
This isn't directly related to the app, but probably more on the APIs it's using. The last seen on the profile page doesn't seem to reflect that I'm actively using the Android app, or taking actions. I was able to vote on items and the last seen property on the profile page said I was last seen 50 minutes ago, when I was using a computer.  I'm assuming it won't count as a visit for the Enthusiast and Fantic badges either. I don't want someone angrily posting on Meta swearing they used the app for a day, yet they lost the consecutive days and has to prove it by showing they voted for something (we're probably far from this situation since it's alpha...)
38921
when I am reviewing an answer, I only see the answer to be reviewed and the corresponding question.   If the answer actually answers the question - at least to some extent - then I have to look at other answers to see if it is not a duplicate. This is sometimes problematic, especially when using a smartphone...    For convenience, I would suggest one of the following:    Show all the answers in review mode,  Introduce a "show other answers" button,  Show at least accepted answer - if any.     (The last option would not quite solve the problem, though)
76793
I just agreed with a duplicate suggestion for one of my .  It's now showing that it was closed as a duplicate by the person who raised the duplicate suggestion and Community.  Since it was my yes this solves my problem click that triggered the closing/status change shouldn't I get credit instead?
82557
I've been avidly checking the review page on StackOverflow, and I am a little curious as to how posts are allocated to reviewers.  Obviously, being a relatively new member, I only have access to new post and late answer reviews.  The queue is usually empty for me, but then I will notice some new questions from apparently first time posters on the new questions page. Also, while sometimes 2 questions are in the queue, it often says I am finished after completing one review.  Could anyone elaborate on how the system distributes reviews?
102276
I have totally reviewed 716 suggested edits, but it shows I've approved 486 suggestions and rejected 228.     I searched about it on meta. But, can't get solution. I thought that some of my reviewed posts might get deleted. So, I went to the review history and found      .   It should be a bug.
82940
I went to a Late Answers review queue that had four items in it and started reviewing the first one by editing it into shape rather heavily.   By the time I was done, someone else had reviewed the same post simply by upvoting it, so I only got a "Next" button, not an "I'm done" button. My edit still counted as an edit; but no longer as a review.  Worse still, the other three items were gone from the review queue as well. Curious, I checked the review tab in the profile of the user who had snatched the first review out from under me. Sure enough, he also "reviewed" the other three items, all within a minute, without even fixing obvious typos, simply by upvoting. I had to go through his review list and review every single post again.   Except, of course, my reviews didn't count as reviews anymore. My review count went up by zero. His went up by four&nbsp;&#8212; for fixing exactly nothing in posts that absolutely could use fixing. To add insult to injury, this was on a site where collecting four review points is incredibly hard because the review queues there are pretty much empty 24/7. (Edit: and now that that is also true of SO, we are seeing the same behavior here.)   So what we get are:   Subpar answers that do not get fixed and get upvoted instead and disappear from the radar of the people who are actually capable of and willing to fix them.  Fastest-gun-in-the-West, single-click, faux reviews that count towards rare Gold badges, while elaborate, actual reviews don't.   This is severely broken.  And I can't think of an easy solution that wouldn't break other things.    Simply not letting upvotes count as reviews is not an option (it discourages upvotes not just on crap, but across the board; and some posts really are fine as is and deserve nothing but an upvote). Simply always counting a review as a review, even if someone else is faster to review the same post, introduces review-point inflation and only solves the problem for one faux review, but not for several in a row, as in the scenario above. Simply letting several people review the same item, like with suggested edits, is not really "simply" anymore, and introduces more review-point inflation still. Likewise, allowing people to reject or override other people's reviews as not substantial enough opens all kinds of cans of worms.   And so on and so forth. I really can't think of anything Solomonic. But perhaps someone else can.
35130
I don't know if I'm being paranoid - but earlier I made a comment on a question that showed no research effort:  . I got a rather snarky reply, and a couple of minutes later I noticed that two of my top questions (which are otherwise on completely different topics) received downvotes within a minute of each other.        It is hard not to suspect a connection between these events, especially in light of the tone of follow-up comments made by the OP (who might not have noticed that I helped improve the answer that was ultimately accepted in the mean time).  Not sure if I am being over sensitive or paranoid; should I just move along? "Spiteful downvote" gets quite a few hits on this site, and maybe I am just too new to be immune to it.  My question(s): "Is there a process to reverse such behavior? Do the comments in the above question merit a flag? Should I shrug an move on?" Any words of advice or encouragement appreciated. Sorry if I sound whiny.  update - the question linked above has been removed "for reasons of moderation". Probably a good outcome. I appreciate all the helpful inputs this generated!  edit This is quite different than the question cited as the duplicate: in that one, a person lost reputation because a user was removed; in this case I suspect an individual user down voted two of my top questions in quick succession "out of spite". The message (shown above) in the rep dashboard was quite different... I request this question be re-opened.
96812
I was reviewing First Posts just now, and I received the following message after my 20th vote:     Thank you for reviewing 20 First Posts today; come back in 8 hours to continue reviewing.   I see other users, with far lower reputation than me, .  Why is it I only have 20 votes?  I saw the  question, but the accepted answer there mentions flag weight, and I was under the impression that Flag Weight is gone (since it is no longer visibile on my profile).  What is the formula that determines the number of First Post votes a person can get per day?
46149
I have found the  has been helpful in prompting me to review queues.  There should be red when there's red dots against review queues:   image stolen from   However, when I have used all my reviews for some queues:    If those queues are large enough to warrant the red alert, it will still show on my review icon, even though none of the queues I am able to review in are not alerting.     It would be better if it is like this:    Can we have the red alert vanish if the alert is for queues we have finished reviewing for the day please? It's honestly annoying and will eventually degrade the UX for avid reviewers. (imo)
35566
Since a , I see more than I should:    I see no reason to see 134 posts are awaiting review, when there is literally nothing I can do about them. I think it is a bug, because notification is meant as something that will make me act. When I know I usually can't, obviously I will start to ignore it.  If it's not a bug, please remove bug tag and explain how it is supposed to be useful, or how can I switch to only seeing notifications about things I can act on.  Note that apaprently there are no flags for me, neither. I see only stats, migrated, close, delete, there, as if there was no flags waiting:    If you expect us to click on it every few minutes  just to see personalized numbers next to queues, why don't you simply query for personalized numbers every few minutes and cache them for us? It should cost you similar, in database usage, and will save us a lot of clicking and frustration.  If all this number means is "there might be reviews, or not" or "for sure there are none"  it would be simpler just to hide "review" link in the second case. We don't need two links with the same function next to each other, thank you, one is enough, and meaningless numbers are only irritating.
60202
As the title suggests, I am blocked for 7 days for reviewing the posts!   Today when I clicked on the counter for reviews (I don't know the exact name for that), I was able to review the content. I reviewed 2 posts and responded as needed!   Here is the thing: I was able to review even while blocked for being stupid while reviewing!  Was it a bug or something else? It happened just a bit ago.        There are the reviews that I did just an hour ago. When I clicked the same link, it reminded me that I am not able to review posts for 3 days more. (7 was the real count!)        I have no idea if this was a bug! Can anyone tell me?
2736
I was reviewing some stuff today, and I came across a rather ridiculous answer (see screenshot). I wanted to see the question and other answers, so I clicked on the link, and found that the answer I was reviewing was in fact deleted. Could someone take a look at it?
119159
Consider the following scenario please:   I see a question and think I have a good answer or comment. I post my answer or comment and move on happily. After couple of hours I see comments that my answer is bad because this and that and it's really bad - I didn't think enough before posting.   The question is: should I delete my post, or leave it be so that people won't repeat my own mistake?
122583
So, I've been giving the mobile application a while for the last week or so, and I'm thrilled to be able to give feedback and report bugs on it.  I'm also thrilled that I can use the Stack Exchange network on my mobile, or tablet!  After about a week, though, I started to realize a few deficiencies in the application - some of which I've already reported as bugs, some of which are already reported, and some of which I'm not sure I should report, since I don't know what role this application is meant to serve.  So, I consider myself a bit of a power user of [Meta]StackOverflow.  I ask questions (at least on Meta), write answers, comment, but the bulk of my time spent on SO isn't geared towards that - it is, more times than not, flagging content, reviewing content, editing content, and otherwise consuming content.  The mobile application is certainly geared towards producing content and consuming content.  It does a fine job of that (although there are some rough cuts).  What I find myself doing, more often than not, though, isn't directly related to production or consumption of content - although I would agree that editing posts while on a 4 inch screen isn't ideal.  I'll compare my flow with the mobile version of the site.   On the mobile site, I can check my profile.   I can see my cumulative daily reputation score here. I can see my favorite questions here. I can see my most recent activity. I get credit for visiting the site.       In the app, I can check the feed.   I see new questions on sites that I'm definitely a member of, or that I've recently visited in the app. I'm not convinced I get credit for visiting the site on the mobile app.  Nor am I convinced that I should - although I want to.       On the mobile site, I can see what badges I've earned overall.   In the app, I can see what badges I've earned that day.       On the mobile site, I can order the results of questions with a lot of answers by votes.   On the app, that's not possible.    What I'm getting at is, despite it being an early alpha, it doesn't feel like it's going to have feature parity with the mobile desktop site.  So, is it meant to supersede the mobile desktop site?  Is it meant to be a CRUD application for SO?  Or does it fit somewhere in between?  I can provide better feedback and bug reports to the team if I have a clear understanding of what niche the app is trying to fill.
56199
I posted a comment on an answer, and refreshed the page.  I then noticed that someone else had also posted a comment.  His comment had an earlier timestamp, but was below mine.    What happened?  (I'm using the Android app, if that matters.)