I noticed this when fiddling around on one of my questions.  Steps to reproduce:  Go to a question (this one), and use the T (10k only) shortcut to open the tag editor. Add any tag (although the  one is preferred), click &quot;Save Edits&quot;, let it give you the error, then cancel it. Watch your hat fall off!   I also did this on  post, and accidentally pulled Anita's hairdo off.  With apologies to Anita, can we fix that?
6336
It seems like there is a bug that is causing a duplicate hat to appear when I expand info, like pressing &quot;(more)&quot; on a suggested edit. This bug does not seem to be specific to the suggested edits review queue though, as others have reported seeing this bug in other places, like code snippet expansion. Steps to repro:  Put on a hat. Navigate to one of your own suggested edits. (You can just also open the Suggested Edits review queue and go to a random suggestion, but there is no guarantee any of those users will be wearing a hat.) Click the &quot;(more)&quot; button to expand the top box.  What should happen: Hat should shift down with the rest of the content. What happens: All the content shifts down, but a duplicate hat remains in the initial place. Before expansion:  After expansion with duplicate hat:
32177
...not literally, of course.  But what happened to the previous menu of close-vote options?  I find the current set unsatisfactory. Take  for example.  Obviously, the question is worthless, because it's an exception that even a n00b programmer should be able to debug on his own. There is nothing special about this bug, and it will help no one in the future.  What could I possibly select as a close reason?   duplicate of... - Maybe. There's the classic  which has been linked to . While the debugging techniques are the same, that's for .NET.  Besides, there are any number of other common exceptions / simple development bugs that wouldn't apply. off-topic because...   ... This question was caused by a problem that can't be reproduced or a simple typographical error. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a manner unlikely to help future readers. This can often be avoided by identifying and closely inspecting  before posting.Notes below....  unclear what you're asking - No, it's clear that the programmer just needs to debug his code. too broad - No, it's quite specific. primarily opinion-based - Nope.   When it was introduced, I was happy to see a "typo" reason, to rid out all the stupid indentation or bracket questions. But... we no longer have a "lacks minimal understanding" reason, which I think is incredibly important. After all, Stack Overflow is here to solve problems that  encounter... not teach users how to code or debug.  So.... what do I pick?  Can we have another revision on the close vote reasons?  I did a cursory search, but couldn't find a Meta post to the intent behind this latest set of reasons. Edit: I believe this is it:     Edit 1/20  Ah, how could I forget about the classic copy &amp; paste homework assignment?      Right or wrong, my close vote was cast with      off-topic because it shows zero desire to actually understand the problem.      we see a moderator closing a question about an incorrect number of function parameters as lacks sufficient information to diagnose the problem. Of course, there probably is sufficient information, and the wording should really be changed to You're too lazy to RTFM.
77345
In the formatted preview for Questions &amp; Answers, typing a tag link with an invalid tag name "crashes" the preview. As soon as you type the following the preview stops updating and an error can be observed in the Javascript console.   [tag:+]   Observed in Safari 7 and Chrome 31.   seems related to the business rule of not allowing certain characters in tags, but it sounds like a different bug.
38266
I just approved several edits from a user adding  to questions with the  tag. Apparently , Google Code Prettify has added support for Dart.  I suggest it's time to follow suit and update the default syntax highlighting associated with the  tag. Adding it manually to every question sounds like way too much work, even if I all I have to do is click the "Approve" button.
41615
I have been editing an answer on , with some considerable amount of effort, and when I hit on Save Edits, the edit gets rejected with the following error. I got to know the meaning of this from .     The edit queue is full at the moment - try again in a few minutes!     I tried in a few mins, and still it didn't work. I believe that some edits might be valuable and this resists the users from doing so.   Main Question: Is there a way to show the queue limit at the beginning of the editing process? (So that we won't spend time on doing the edit, knowing it will fail)
50850
I have attempted to edit . In this case, it contained code within a single block. As soon as the editor comes up, the app stops responding and crashes after a few seconds. I have tested this several times and it has occurred each time.  However, this does not occur in the browser (the Chrome app, at least).   iOS version: 8.1.3 (latest) App version: 1.2.2 (latest)
34497
I just made some minor edits to the text of .  I didn't edit the tags at all.  When I completed my edits, my edit showed as:    Now, I think those tags were present before I started my edit, and so were probably slipped in by the OP in their edit grace window.  I have no problem with that tagging, but I don't like seeing edits attributed to me that I didn't make.  So, what the heck?
34224
I hope someone can see this post because the same thing happens in the bugs tab on meta for me right now:     Edit:   works now.   still broken (as in screenshot).   Edit:  Go tag listing now working again.
99456
Suppose I come across old question with glaring syntax error or  - should I edit it thus throwing it to the top of the line, or leave it be?  Motivation to edit is in case someone come across it as result of a search, but as it's old and not relevant question anymore, it doesn't feel right to put it on top of the line again.  If we had the option to edit without bumping it would be ideal, but I guess such feature is not very realistic.  So, what's your opinion?
36978
With the tag page changed, there are some.. let's call them "controversial" opinions whether it's an improvement or not; I'd rather not comment on that, but point out a certain "feature" in the tag excerpts wikis which are shown on the \tags page:  Case in point from the TeX-SE tags page:      The  tag wiki excerpt reads:     TeX and friends give you the resources to put text in the header and footer of your document. This tag is for questions relating to this.   Huh?   I thought it was just someone was being lazy not providing a proper tag description. But it turned out that this happens on a lot more tags, to a different degree. The layout script, or whatever it is, tries to be clever, and removes some stuff in front of the tag excerpts to avoid repetition, presumably.   The cases I noticed so far:   "Questions tagged with [foo]" "This tag is about" "Choose this tag if your question is" "Use the [foo] tag for" "[foo] is" "This tag"   .. and probably more, I'm too lazy to search.   The point is -- the script tries to be clever and removes whole sentences, leaving weird and incomplete description, which is what tag wikis are all about.   Now, the questions:   Is this  or a bug? How exactly does it work? What template for tag excerpts should we use to avoid ridiculous entries like the one shown?
66857
I have been cleaning up tags on SU today and accidentally created a new tag by hitting return when the tag suggestion drop-down highlighted the tag I wanted. I probably should have pressed tab instead....  Anyway, I would like a confirmation when a new tag is created, both as a way to avoid stupid mistakes and as a place to add a few pointers on tag creation.  For example:     Tag FOO does not exist, are you sure you want to create it.      Please make sure that         there isn't an existing tag or sets of tags that can be used instead.   there isn't an alternative spelling already in use   it's not a meta-tag   isn't comprised of numbers only   it's spelled correctly         before you proceed
84009
Waiting 60 seconds every time I make a mistake when posting a question with the Android app is a pain. Couldn't this delay be lowered to some more user-friendly delay?        (mistake = e.g. forgetting a compulsory tag)
2934
Today I tried editing the tags using "edit tag" option for 10K users.     Update a tag - > SAVED It didn't showed my name. After a refresh, it showed my name.   Below are the screenshots for clear explanation.    Is this the exact behavior?
81207
I ran into an issue on Gaming.SE where I attempted to create a tag wiki and wiki excerpt for a tag which did not have one already while I already have the maximum of five suggested edits in the queue.  Navigating to the tag page for the  provides a link to  for this tag. This link redirects to the  for this tag, without telling me that I can't submit an edit because I've reached the maximum number of suggested edits. Instead of silently redirecting, the page should alert me that I can't suggest any more edits until my suggestions are reviewed.
39033
I just looked on SO, and found that there are about 12,880 tags with only a single use. There are 26,250 used less than 10 times.  That's just too many for the community to fix. I think we need some automatic cleanup here.  I suggest you add a cleanup process to remove all tags used less than a certain number of times more than a month after their creation. That would give a legitimate tag a while to become used more, while removing those that will never be used more than a few times.    Edit: Here are the tags from page 512. I've highlighted the ones I think are most likely bad tags. I even fixed a few:   installer-class inspector installation-tools insert-worksheet insets insomnia-mysteries inorder inprivate inprocfactory inprocserver in-progress input-button input-buffer input-mask inputformsection insert-nested-select insert-parameters insert-img-to-option insert-data insertdate insert-delayed insertafter insertchildbefore input-mode input-simulation inputpanel inputrc input-redirection inquiry-management inputstreamreader input-string input-testing infocards infochannel infogrid inflector influence info-plist inforeader inform inform7 information-base information-card information-dispersal informed-search information-sources information-technology information-ownership information-science info-vis informx (fixed now) info-window infralution inheritence (typo - fixed) initialcapacity initial-context initialization-block initfileurlwithpath inline-comments inline-cpp inline-edit inlinec initialize-request-handl injectable injectors init-script inittab initwithcontentsoffile initwithcontentsofurl inlinks
101799
I recently  and someone edited my message, but all they did was reorder the tags I had already used.   (Edit: they did actually correct one, I just noticed)  Is there any benefits to the order in which you add tags? personally I thought there wasn't any weighting?
82402
Notes:  Answers will occasionally be moved to the  when there are too many of them. When using them to report bugs, keep an eye on the post.    This site, Meta Stack Exchange, is usually used as a &quot;test bed&quot; for pending changes happening to the way text is rendered on all network sites. Changes to text rendering that are going to be rolled out to the network are usually deployed here first to test them out and fix any potential glitches. Currently, there are no such changes pending, but if there were, keep in mind that text posted here may render differently from the other sites until the changes roll out to them as well.    As per Jeff's suggestion in : You can use this question as a formatting sandbox. You can:  edit  itself ( questions such as this one require only 100 reputation to edit instead of 2,000) post answers to this question (This question might be , requiring earning 10 reputation on this site to answer) post comments to this question or its answers test suspected bugs with the editor or the rendering post ponies (only when mods are asleep)   Beware that since the  in December 2010, and  added in March 2011, no syntax highlighting is applied unless the question's tags or an inline hint enable it. So, to test highlighting here in the sandbox:  , you can use GitHub-flavor fenced code blocks in your posts, specifying the language after the opening fence: ```html While not hinted otherwise: &lt;html&gt;&lt;/html&gt; source &lt;b&gt;goes&lt;/b&gt; &quot;here&quot;. ```  ```js var a = 3; while (not (a &gt; 0)) {     alert(&quot;JavaScript code &lt;b&gt;goes&lt;/b&gt; here.&quot;); } ```   Or:  Create code blocks in any way (using the fence notation above, the four-space indent form, or using HTML &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt; tags).  Save your post.  Use your browser's developer tools to edit the resulting HTML. To open developer tools, press F12, or ⌥⌘ I on Mac.  Find the &lt;pre&gt; element and add the attribute class=&quot;prettyprint&quot;, or change it into one of the valid syntax hints linked above, like class=&quot;lang-vb prettyprint&quot;.  Run the following in the location bar: javascript:prettyPrint(); or prettyPrint() in the console.     Answers that are considered annoying or obnoxious, or that cause breakage for users, will be deleted. This is .