Is it still the case that Purgeable part is not under our control (to be deleted)? There are several posts (e.g., ) on this, but no solution as it seems.
19130
I cleared space on my disk by deleting files and emptying trash. But, I am unable to make use of the space that I freed up. That is, as you can see the disk reports 142 GB as Available with 83 GB of that as purgeable.    So I should have plenty of space to to copy over a 70 GB file onto the disk. Yet when I try I get an error stating "Not enough disk space to copy", like the following image shows:    How do I clear out the purgeable space to make it truly available for use?  I've tried rebooting in the hopes that a restart clears out the purgeable area, but had no change trying that.
63352
The excavator has been awarded to... many users just some time ago. What a... bug? Certainly it is, too many unavailable posts :D  Seems to affect Marshal and Excavator.        Also looks like it's everywhere. SO's got a similar problem a couple of minutes before.  Moreover, I can has THREE X marshals!!!
47035
I found  (only visible to 10k+ users on SFF, sorry) which had been deleted from review some hours ago but also flagged for conversion to a comment. I undeleted it and converted it to a comment (which of course re-deletes the answer), only to see that the post claimed to have been "deleted from review just now" by the same list of users as before.  Here's a screenshot of the timeline:    And here's one of what the post itself looks like now:    It was actually deleted from review 3 hours ago and then undeleted and redeleted by me 36 minutes ago, but to a casual observer it looks like it was deleted from review 36 minutes ago.  I'm posting this as a  report because it's technically showing incorrect information, but I'd be perfectly happy to be told it's actually a new feature. In fact, I've often found it annoying that when a whole bunch of users have voted to delete a post and then I convert it to a comment, their votes don't show up and it looks like I've acted unilaterally to remove it. This kind of remedies that.
14565
My reputation rating on SO took this hit an hour ago, and it is due to what appears to be the simultaneous deletion of multiple questions.  I am uncertain why it happened, am concerned, and would appreciate an explanation.  Going to  shows that it was removed due to moderation.  Was a script run deliberately, or were we hit with a question deletion attack; what happened?  -12     today -2  1 hour ago  removed     How to send a 2d Vector over UDP in c++ -2  1 hour ago  removed     How do I use the Eclipse debugger to debug a Java application? -2  1 hour ago  removed     PHP string error; inconsistency with local and server -2  1 hour ago  removed     Unable to start the MySQL service after a server migration -2  1 hour ago  removed     How to use Java to print a text file on a ticket printer? -2  1 hour ago  removed     How can all of the ZBrush Obj files be imported to make a complete model?
61388
Problem background  This question is addressed to you, ♦ moderators. There is e.g. , which is full of very useful information. It's been a community wiki with more than 17k views with 51 answers.  The question is off-topic, there's nothing to discuss, but why it was deleted ? Couldn't you just lock it as you did with a several posts around ? The biggest problem is that our community can't even undelete it because it's protected by the ♦ law.  So now it's a community wiki question, which can't be seen nor even undeleted by the community.  Question  Could you undelete that question and let the community decide what to do with it? And if that is possible, could you lock that question to keep its content visible and as it is?    P.S. those reopen votes are there because of curiosity. We shall keep that question closed.
44958
Nice hole in the system... You can pretty much say anything in a revision comment and it cannot be removed or cleaned up by a mod.  See  for an example.  Mods need the ability to at least remove the comment, if not the ability to edit the text of it.
28369
It seems the spamfilter on the "Help and Improvement" queue has some problem. From  (from the review of  question).  I think,   Well, "there are" happens quite often in spams, also often in hams :-) Maybe in the case of a 3k+ user it is not really probable he would try to spam.   On my tries it seems, the first word of the edited message is considered always spammy.
48791
Since my profile will be deleted in a few hours, this doesn't concern me, but the remaining people may be interested.  We know the already famous post: . One may be surprised that it has too few comments, especially highly negative ones. It seems that the reason is simple: moderation. About 4 hours ago I've written the comment there, but it wasn't published. Since I don't see it "awaiting moderation" anymore and I see much later comments published, it seems to be removed. The comment was along these lines:     There were a lot of things I didn't like in SO: too positively-skewed   reputation changes, generally-accepted reputation farming via   answering duplicates which were asked 10 times, extremely low quality   threshold for questions, "accepted answer" feature implementation, etc. and etc. Looking at the recent changes,   things will become only worse. I'm deleting my profile.   Now, the question is: why was it removed? Is it unfriendly? Sure, but I don't see why it should be friendly: we express our opinions, and my opinion is negative. Is it non-constructive? Well, to some extent, but definitely more constructive than:     Nice! I’m (hopefully) looking forward to passing the 10k mark   If there are rules for commenting (like 2. You DO NOT TALK bad about SO), I think it makes sense to publish them (and give an easily-found link to them in the blog). It also would be interesting to know how comment moderation is organized.
70919
I noticed that the  was deleted.   When the  came out, I tried to look for my old answer as well as others for comparison.  Why not just mark the old one superseded by [insert link]?  Note: I don't care about lost rep. There were a lot of useful links in answers and comments there (and some less-than-useful ones too).     Old CoC FAQ may be available  and . Source: (, ).
87205
I just saw a post (deleted)  which was deleted by  but is shown as:   deleted by Charles, Gordon♦, Gordon♦ 1 min ago   How is it that one person (whether a mod or not) can vote twice on the same post?
94903
How can someone make an appeal to un-delete an answer that was deleted by a moderator?    There should at least be an appeal/vote process, if the deletion was unfair. Moderators are humans like rest of us, and they can be unjust.
104562
seems to be making edits to his own questions and saying that he's flagging them for deletion (not sure about the flagging part though since I don't have enough rep for that, but that's according to his newly edited questions. However according to his reputation - 10 currently - he shouldn't even have flagging privileges yet).  I stumbled upon one of his questions in the close queue, it had an accepted answer so I reverted the question back one step, and having seen that he's done the same thing to multiple questions I'm not sure about how this should be handled. I am not sure about if he has access to the delete button on his own questions or not.  As I'm not sure how to handle this I wanted to bring it to the community's attention and ask for support for how to handle future cases like this. Should all questions be reverted back? Should they be closed (possibly with the motivation "user seems to want this question gone")?
21810
I've seen , but there seem to be no proper solution.  I suggest an ability to insert a "Let us continue this discussion in chat" comment before the thread gets messy enough to fit the requirement. The point is to prevent the problem before it occurs.  Perhaps this should become a privilege for users of X reputation or more?  Your opinions on the subject?
49279
I am aware that is was asked to have  and , however I couldn't find anywhere any indication of past moderators e.g. someone who was moderator year or two ago but no longer act as one. My incentive for asking for such a thing:  (10K+ rep needed to see it) was deleted by a  who is not a moderator now. I can only guess he was moderator back in March 30th 2011 when he deleted it, but it's only an assumption. So, to the  I suggest to add another link like &quot;Archive&quot; or &quot;Past moderators&quot;.
28393
I asked , but within minutes, it was off the question list even though the question list went back an hour in time.  Is this some form of moderation?  If so, it seems weird that no comment was made within the thread that the question was deleted, moved, or otherwise removed from the question list.
25763
There is some sort of delay for deletion of your own closed questions (2 days, I think) for non-mods. Now, when you try deleting a closed question on the desktop site, it nicely tells you "please wait xyz to allow for possible reopening" (in a box similar to the "please consider adding a comment explaining why you downvoted" thingy).  On mobile, it just reloads the page—there is no indicator that deletion is not allowed.  Either completely disable the delete button on mobile for closed questions, or give it a popup as well. Not letting the user know what's wrong is confusing.
109972
We know from the  that it is accepted only in a limited way in answers and frowned upon if found to be spammy. We know from  that it can be deleted at any time from comments if the comment is not relevant or spammy.  But what about the chat? This leaves chat to be the only legitimate place to promote products or services that the user is affiliated to (albeit in an ad-like way).  What is your opinion?