Chrome doesn't offer to save passwords at some sites, is there any way to add the passwords manully?
121008
Is there a way to force Google Chrome to remember passwords for sites that have autocomplete turned off? Clarification: I am a programmer, but ideally, I'd like a method that I could help regular users implement, too.
13037
There are situations I require to save a "complete" web page for offline reading. I can easily do that on Windows by saving the web page, but not on Android.  I am using Chrome on Android and I don't see a "save" option. Instead, I see "Save link" which, I believe, saves "only" the "pure HTML" version of a site of which the link leads to.  I have tried this but, when I view it in the HTML Viewer a lot of necessary CSS formatting and all the images were lost, which made the information misleading and incomplete respectively. (PS I thought I downloaded the complete page and the fault was that of the HTML Viewer for not rendering every thing, but I was wrong, as the desktop Chrome also displayed the "only HTML" version when I transferred those pages to my laptop through Bluetooth).  So, my question is: How can I download "a complete" web page on my Android smart-phone. It's OK if I can't view it on my smart-phone, but every thing should be in place when I view it on my laptop after transferring it. It is also OK if it is saved as a PDF file.  (PS I'm asking this as I use internet very often in my smartphone because my laptop is not connected to the internet. Also I want to transfer it to my laptop because I don't want to view those "important" pages on a small screen, it's inconvenient).
80639
As the title says; I used to be able to press Tab+Enter in Chrome to take me to the first search result. This now only works if I am not signed in to my Google account. When signed in, I can't do it. It works fine (signed in and not) on Firefox.  I believe this may have stopped working since a system update.  I'm using:   Ubuntu 12.10 Chrome 23.0.1271.64   Is this to do with a setting within Google, or is it something within Chrome? Because it works in Firefox, it suggests it is a Chrome problem. I tried disabling all extensions, but no joy.
120898
Here are the steps to reproduce this problem:   Be on a device where I am not logged-in to a meta site. Go to the main *.stackexchange.com site - Everything seems to work fine. Go to the meta.*.stackexchange.com site and click log in in the title bar - Page just refreshes without logging in. WTF?   Here is the workaround I have found to work:   Go to main *.stackexchange.com site and click on help=>meta Click through  about the . Log-in works.   I'm not fussy about whether my connection to SE is encrypted.  However, I do care that this problem created a barrier to my participation in meta.*.stackexchange.com.  I cared and knew enough to poke at this thing for five minutes and find a workaround so I could vote on a .  I doubt, however, that this is the case for most users.  It concerns me that participation in meta is being filtered by a technical problem.    I use chrome as my browser, and my google account to authenticate.  The problem exists on both Travel and English se.com on both a Windows 7 and 8.1 machine.     seems similar.  However, the symptoms are different in two ways: In my case no login page is ever presented, and I'm not using OpenID.
87613
It gets so horrible that I can not even switch to TTY1 to force a reboot. I have to hard reset, and I lose work.  Ideally, I would like to be able to use the chrome browser on Ubuntu without having to keep reminding myself to close tabs.   Are there any extensions for Chrome, or tools for Ubuntu that can help prevent me going past the point where Ubuntu eats up all the RAM and becomes incapacitated?
39373
As of Chrome 58 it no longer accepts self-signed certs that rely on Common Name: $3ACanary%7Csort:relevance%7Cspell:false  Instead it requires using Subject Alt Name. I have been previously following this guide on how to generate a self-signed cert:  which worked great because I required the server.crt and server.key files for what I'm doing. I now need to generate new certs that include the SAN however all of my attempts to do so have not worked with Chrome 58.  Here is what I've done:  I followed the steps on the above mentioned Heroku article to generate the key. I then wrote a new OpenSSL config file:  [ req ] default_bits        = 2048 distinguished_name  = req_distinguished_name req_extensions      = san extensions          = san [ req_distinguished_name ] countryName         = US stateOrProvinceName = Massachusetts localityName        = Boston organizationName    = MyCompany [ san ] subjectAltName      = DNS:dev.mycompany.com   Then generated the server.crt with the following command:  openssl req \ -new \ -key server.key \ -out server.csr \ -config config.cnf \ -sha256 \ -days 3650   I'm on a Mac, so I opened the server.crt file with Keychain, added it to my System Certificates. I then set it to Always Trust.  With the exception of the config file to set the SAN value these were similar steps I used in prior versions of Chrome to generate and trust the self-signed cert.  However, after this I still get the ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID in Chrome 58.
108622
How do I configure Ubuntu or Xubuntu such that when I click on a link, Chromium/Chrome opens in "Incognito mode"?
68993
Where can you download 32 bit edition of Google Chrome for Ubuntu OS?
36374
I read through all the related answers, but they do not apply to Ubuntu 14.04.  I have no .gnome2 folder and no Passwords and Encryption keys item in the system settings. I tried to crawl through every possible menu, but I could not find out how to do it.  The popup usually pops out when I start Chromium.
62132
I'm using  and I accidentally clicked "No" when asked if I want to integrate with the website.  How can I have Firefox or Chrome reask me to integrate the site with Ubuntu?
89001
It's known that when you're connecting to a wrong server via ssh and send your password  to it, your password comes in a plain text and a server saves it by default. Probably. I wonder, where I can retrieve it? I don't see it in /var/log/auth.log, although I do see all the attempts to authenticate.
120376
As more and more websites add  of one type or another to e-mail and password fields and more people use password managers, the two are increasingly coming into conflict.  While there are extensions such as  for Chrome or  and the dom.event.clipboardevents.enabled preference&dagger; for FireFox, all of these suffer the problem that there are legitimate reasons why websites might want to hook into onpaste (such as Google docs rich text support or Facebook's link handling) so I don't want that functionality completely disabled.  &dagger; Go to about:config and search for dom.event.clipboardevents.enabled then double click to toggle.  Another option is to hack every page you find with the offending code manually, but that is a lot of hassle and doesn't work in every case (such as with ). One suggestion of how to do this can be found on Martin Brinkmann's  page.  Ideally I just want to be able to say "Re-enable paste on all fields on this page" either as a button or a context menu option for the page, so is there any way to do this?  The closest thing I have found is Derek Prior's  but this uses the same method as the manual method, so fails to work with the specific page I was having problems with, and I have no idea how many other methods might be available.
115664
It asks for login profile name and then password. Is it some kind of problem or it looks that way?
104127
As a response to the recent  and , what is the best way to secure your website against brute force login attacks?  Jeff's post suggests putting in an increasing delay for each attempted login, and a suggestion in the comments is to add a captcha after the 2nd failed attempt.  Both these seem like good ideas, but how do you know what "attempt number" it is?  You can't rely on a session ID (because an attacker could change it each time) or an IP address (better, but vulnerable to botnets).  Simply logging it against the username could, using the delay method, lock out a legitimate user (or at least make the login process very slow for them).  Thoughts? Suggestions?
99269
Form-based authentication for websites  We believe that Stack&nbsp;Overflow should not just be a resource for very specific technical questions, but also for general guidelines on how to solve variations on common problems. "Form based authentication for websites" should be a fine topic for such an experiment.  It should include topics such as:   How to log in How to log out How to remain logged in Managing cookies (including recommended settings) SSL/HTTPS encryption How to store passwords Using secret questions Forgotten username/password functionality Use of  to prevent   "Remember me" checkbox Browser autocompletion of usernames and passwords Secret URLs (public  protected by digest) Checking password strength E-mail validation and much more about ...   It should not include things like:   Roles and authorization HTTP basic authentication   Please help us by:   Suggesting subtopics Submitting good articles about this subject Editing the official answer
102797
I cleared all my browser data and visited  and it logged me back in. How?  This happens on Chrome on OS X and Windows 7.  Surely the security concerns outweigh the benefits to the user. What if a family member or friend wants to use my machine? I wouldn't want them logged in as me.  Update  My mistake, I should have said data &#8212; all those checkboxes clicked/checked. I completely cleared everything, yet it still logs me back in.  Update 2  Here's a video to prove it:
72405
I don't know whether this just started or perhaps it's actually something new in my browser, but it must come down to SE code ultimately and I've never noticed it before today/yesterday.  Submit a comment via the "Add Comment" button, or submit a close-vote, or post a question, or do anything really that involves clicking one of those kinds of buttons, in Chrome 48 on Windows 7 64-bit, and you'll see your mouse cursor very briefly turn into the "not allowed" cursor right before the button is removed.      It seems the button is being disabled or whatnot before it's being hidden, which results in this "flash of malstyled content". Not a big deal but a little annoying.