I was wondering what would happen to all the components on the surface of the Earth if the Earth suddenly stops rotating but does not stop revolving.
121027
What would happen if the earth would stop spinning? How much heavier would we be? I mean absolutely stop spinning. How much does the centrifugal force affect us?  If you give technical answers (please do), please explain them in laymen's terms, thanks.  Edit: I am asking what would be different if the earth were not spinning. Nevermind the part about it stopping.
7117
When I'm rotating, I feel centrifugal force. But if I were the only one in the universe and rotating, wouldn't I just kinda be still (since I'm not rotating with respect to anything) or would there just be a force pulling me out? What if there were another person a billion miles away, this should not change anything, right?
36941
Let's take a planet identical to Earth, but with rotation speed multiplied by ten thousand. What would happen with the gravity if it was spinning madly around itself? Would the centrifugal force make objects seem lighter than on normal Earth? Would the people on that planet be able to jump higher?
117026
Lets imagine a binary system of two astronauts in space connected to one another via light rope.  The rope is taut and they're spinning round and round with their axis of rotation being the the axis perpendicular to the their centre of mass.  Now, my question is this. Lets say they each let go of the rope; they move off at tangents.  Is angular momentum conserved ? And what is their subsequent motion ?  My hypothesis : They will move off at constant velocity at a tangent to their circular motion. I believe that because they now under the effects of no external force by the rotational analogue of newton's second law (dL/dt = T) their angular momentum will be of equal magnitude but opposite sign.  Does this make sense ?
6070
A thought experiment: Imagine the Sun is suddenly removed. We wouldn't notice a difference for 8 minutes, because that's how long light takes to get from the Sun's surface to Earth.   However, what about the Sun's gravitational effect? If gravity propagates at the speed of light, for 8 minutes the Earth will continue to follow an orbit around nothing. If however, gravity is due to a distortion of spacetime, this distortion will cease to exist as soon as the mass is removed, thus the Earth will leave through the orbit tangent, so we could observe the Sun's disappearance more quickly.  What is the state of the research around such a thought experiment? Can this be inferred from observation?
1180
What is the proof, without leaving the Earth, and involving only basic physics, that the earth rotates around its axis?  By basic physics I mean the physics that the early physicists must've used to deduce that it rotates, not relativity.
21766
In many practical applications, one can consider the Earth-Centered Inertial () reference frame approximately as an inertial reference system, though strictly speaking, it is non-inertial.   Is there any quotable reference, where this claim is supported by a detailed estimation how small the effects are that one neglects if one considers the Earth's frame as inertial?
48047
See below gif image taken from .    Or see  about 30 sec in.    Is this a real effect?  Why does it seem to turn periodically? Can it be explained by classical mechanics alone? Is there a simple equation that models this behaviour?
10851
The question I am working on is, &quot;Consider the following. (a) Find the angular speed of Earth's rotation about its axis. rad/s (b) How does this rotation affect the shape of Earth?&quot;  I am fully capable of solving part (a); however, I am not sure how to describe the effect earth's rotation on its shape. I tried to search my textbook for the answer, but could not find anything. Is there an actual effect on the shape?
117968
If the air is flowing with the earth, as it rotates, how do we feel a breeze and strong winds at times, as everyone has experienced, the wind shifts as if from many directions.
71053
I understand that perpetual motion is impossible, but I became confused when a friend of mine told me that the orbits of the planets is an example of perpetual motion. Will earth's orbit ever end, and whats wrong with his statement. I'm asking for a simple answer to 'disprove' my friends 'theory'.
25503
A friend showed me a  (a special kind of spinning top) lately and asked me about the physics behind it. I thought about it for a while but cannot quite figure it out. So I will throw the question to SE. Below is a picture of tippe top:  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  So basically the strange effect is that when you spin such a top fast enough with its round surface touching the table, the top will wobble and eventually invert itself. There is a  and here is an illustrative picture:   &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  So my questions are:   Why is the top so unstable? Why does it invert? Why does the initial angular velocity of the top matter? (Why do we have to spin faster than a certain velocity in order for the top to invert?) What other shapes will lead to inversion?   I am looking for some intuitive explanations that do not involve too much mathematics. Heuristic approaches are welcomed!
88036
I have already read        and many others   But I still have the following problem:   On one hand I've been told that if pure rotation takes place then the object goes on forever. This must imply no frictional force in any form acting on the body. On the second hand I've been told that during pure rotation(no external forces like wind) on a plane surface friction acts opposite to velocity of center of mass (accompanied by change of normal) and slows it down.     Both seem logical enough: The point of contact doesn't slip therefore no friction is required; So no retarding force and it must go on. Things don't go on forever; Friction must be present to slow it down.    So, which hand is correct? Or is there a third hand altogether?
27243
We may choose a non-rotating earth as our reference frame and ask ourselves: how about the planetary and stellar motions. A star at a distance of 10 million light years would turn around the earth in 24h with a velocity of 10^18 m/s.   A friend once told me that actually articles have been published delving into this problem, e.g. to prove that fictitious forces emerge from the choice of such a bizar reference frame that ensure that the earth is still (somewhat) flattened at it's poles.  Questions:  1) Does anybody know of such a publication?  2) I know that even such speeds of 10^18 m/s are not in contradiction with relativity because a limiting velocity only exists for exchange of information, which apparantly does not occur. Still: could anybody explain why such bizar velocities are allowed?
23004
I'm sorry if the answer is obvious for you guys, but why don't we all (including buildings, road, people, the ground) collapse to the center of the earth because of gravity? Is it because we have velocity, just like the earth not falling to the sun (or electrons not falling to the protons)? But that analogy doesn't sound right because those involve wide empty space.
70500
I know there are similar questions on StackExchange but I think it is different and detailed.  The earth is spinning 465 meters/second so why don't we jump and land on a different location?  I googled about this question and I got some answers:   When we jump, we (and the atmosphere itself) also spin along with the earth so we don't land at a different location. (But why we are also spinning along with earth ?) The earth is so big and we are very small relative to earth so the tiny jump won't make any difference.   But according to answer 1, We are also spinning with the earth. But the question is, "why are we also spinning along with earth" ??  Regarding the answer 2, it won't make any difference but logically it doesn't make sense or I just don't understand it.  Here is the followup question,   "When we jump why don't we thrown out of earth due to centrifugal force of the spinning earth ??"  Please provide some detailed answer to these questions. With logic if possible.   This phenomenon is not possible I know, but even if it exists, then traveling will be so easy, we just have to hang on space (with help of helicopter etc.. ) and we can travel the whole world in 24 hours :D
75380
I have problem understanding total angular momentum of earth about center of sun. Consider that earth has an orbital angular velocity of $\omega_0 \hat z$ and a spin angular velocity of $\omega_s \hat s$, distance between the centers of sun and earth as $R$ and radius of earth as $r$ and that earth has mass $m$. My understanding is that total angular momentum of center of mass of earth + angular momentum about CM of earth is $$L = m R^2 \omega_0 \hat z  + \frac{2}{5} m r^2 \omega_s \hat s $$ however a it's given in my text book as  $$L = m R^2 \omega_0 \hat z  + \frac{2}{5} m r^2(\omega_s \hat s + \omega_0 \hat z) $$  Why does the the $\omega_0$ appear when calculating angular momentum about CM of earth?