I just joined Code Review SE and was surprised by this visual glitch:   It says "+98" on the top right corner, but the popup clearly states "+100". I can think of 2 possibilities:   I started with 2 rep when I joined. I got downvoted right before I joined Code Review.   The second possibility seems more likely, but I'm not sure that I got downvoted just a minute ago.
122943
I just visited Stack Overflow. Recent achievments change popup told me that I've got +24 reputation points. However, when I opened it up, it turned out, that I've got 25+1 = 26 points:    What am I missing? Is this a bug or by-design and I just don't get it?  EDIT: (copy of below comment, for clarification) If I'm not mistaken, score highlighted in the popup (24 in this case) should only indicate entires in achievements list, that were not yet noticed by me, that is -- those with non-white background (25 + 1 in this case). Correct me, if I'm wrong, but if I'm right, then there is a bug in calculation algorithm. I have two items, with recent changes, "unread" (not seen by me), which total amount of 26, while score popup informs me only about 24 points. This is the only thing, that I don't get here.
121139
I received a  badge for an  with 9 upvotes and 1 downvotes for a net of 8 points. Awarding this badge during the upvote revocation timeout period seems like a bug to me.
48562
So when we view reputation, there is graph view. However, it seems to be off by a day. Here's what I mean:   I'm sure 70 + 20 + 15 is not 15. Its 105, which is what we see below:   And 40 + 10 is NOT 105, unless you did  :)     Anyways 40 + 10 is 50:   So yeah. Did you do what that post on codegolf says? Devs better fix that :)
102166
See . Someone other than the OP changed the code to address a substantial problem with the it that was addressed as part of my answer. The problem was admittedly peripheral to the core question, but it was a primary differentiator between my answer and another answer submitted at the same time.  Any suggestions on what to do in this situation? Leave it be? Edit it back? Something else?  Update: I just found , from the "Related Links" section on the right, which is pretty relevant. I have to keep remembering to check there rather than just searching for answers.
25076
So just a little while ago i was flipping out because i was 2 rep away from my 10k rep goal    but then all of a sudden it was then 10,008 rep because someone upvoted me. however i didn't get any notification about this +10  [    now as you can see in the screenshots above, over the past 2 days i got 2 upvotes to a question i posted, however the notifications only shows 1 +10 notification. and they system knows i got the upvote because i knew that i now have access to mod tools.  I am on a Windows 10 Laptop using Chrome 78.0.3904.97 (Official Build) (64-bit)
54316
I have just noticed that we have had 63 reopen votes in the review queue all of a sudden. I was doing reviews, it was zero when it got bumped all. I am wondering why this may have happened. See the screenshot below.    I have  thread where the root cause was a change in the workflow, so I wonder if there is similar here again, or it is because of something else?  Thank you in advance.
124192
I just experienced a minor visual bug.  I had an answer that earned 2 down votes and 22+ upvotes, earning me the daily maximum of +200. Upon making some edits to the answer at the behest of the comments, one of the users who down voted changed their vote. Now my reputation meter shows that I gained +202 for the day.    This correctly did NOT affect my reputation, as I still only gained 200, so it is merely a minor display bug.  This appears in the achievements drop down and my reputation tab on my profile.
45474
For your continued efforts in reviewing posts, even though the system sometimes messes up and doesn't let you actually review things and keeps displaying them over and over and over. So also, for your patience in putting up with the glitches in the review panel too! Haha  Anyways, a gold reviewer badge: 20000 reviews, over 4000 actioned  I just multiplied both numbers by 20. Think those numbers seem challenging? Is anyone up near those numbers or should it be multiplied by 10 instead? I prefer the higher amount because it would be gold and something harder to work for. :) But we also have to consider the longevity of when all these posts are eventually reviewed and it's only new posts being created.  Anyways, my stats for those who are interested (I wouldn't get the badge to start because I only have ~2000 actioned):  Upvoted            189 Downvoted          11 Edited             926 Commented          127 Voted to Close     44 Flagged            447 Reviewed           21609   As far as the name of the badge, I really like "The Owl is Watching" but not sure if that would be too long. Sounds snazzy though. Ideas?    Personally, I was on a quest to try and clear out all the posts in a single tab before it started showing me the same things over and over (and over) and then it got frustrating because I wasn't even making progress. Quest denied. :(    Lately I've noticed a massive build-up of unreviewed posts. When the review panel was first implemented, there would only ever be maybe 50 unreviewed posts at a time (in a given tab) for my monthly view. Now I log in and there's a thousand or two thousand pending. I think a lot of people quit reviewing after the first badge, so having a gold badge with a high threshold would really improve activity in the review panel and keep people going to improve the community.
60876
Overall reputation scores are headed nowhere but up.  Pretty soon there will be thousands of mods.  What to do?  Thoughts on possibilities:   Thousands of mods is fine.  Carry on. Adjust the threshold values for high-level SO privileges. Do a straight-up inflation adjustment.  You had x rep, then at the turn of the year we applied the Consumer Rep Index to all scores, now you have (x / inflation) rep. Implement a rep decay mechanism, so that inactivity sheds some of the overall rep that's built up.
91162
I just renewed my antivirus (Kaspersky's) yesterday. After that, I logged onto Chemistry.SE (which I frequent often) but then I was greeted with this  Which was definitely not how it looked like earlier that morning. I wasn't able to  Open the reputation and badges tab Vote on questions, answers and comments (even answers to MY questions) Comment on questions or answers. 'Favorite' a question Attach tags to a question Post questions  etc., etc. But when I logged on to the Physics and Biology SEs (which I also frequent), the page format hadn't changed, but I still faced the same problems as above. Does anyone know how to fix this? P.S- I'm not a computer/formatting whiz, so you'd have to try avoiding the jargon when helping me out, sorry.... (Also I use Chrome...in case that's important.) Also @Oded recommended checking out the browser developer tools and having a look at the CSS, but as I said, I'm no Software/formatting whiz...so I'm still lost....  On @Shadow Wizard 's advice I've taken a screen shot of the 'error' notification (I had to scroll down to get all 10 'errors' on screen, hence the need for separate screen-shots)
72429
A few days ago, someone posted a question about updating dataset. After some questions/comments to his question, it didn't receive answers (and no up/down vote).  1 or 2 days later, the user posted the  (he just reformulated the question, posted less code and with bad formatting, the code doesn't compile due to missing ' for comments), so it would be harder to get answer for this question . The question received a +1.   I flagged this question as a duplicate of the previous and asked user to edit the previous instead of creating a new one, but he deleted the previous.  I do not blame the asker, I understand he wanted to keep it's 5 points rep  :) And it seems he solved his problem later.  But now the flag is marked with eventinvalidated because it is impossible now to accept or reject it?   Since my flag is no longer appropriate, I am just curious about what could happen to this flag?
9323
Something changed recently, and since a picture is worth a thousand words:    Until not very long ago, the "score" and "answers" labels were followed by numbers indicating the values of the progress bars underneath. So "score" might have "90/100" in this example. I'm not seeing that now for any of the badge progress indicators, so it looks like a recently introduced bug.
19820
What is the actual source of the number displayed next to the review link in the top bar? I found  (via  and similar) but, and apologies if I'm being dense, the answer there didn't seem to have an explanation of where the specific number comes from.  I can't make any combination of task counts on /review (that are visible to me, at least) add up to the number in the top bar. I had thought that perhaps it was a count that just lagged a little behind the /review counts, but it changes often and quickly enough (and is so far off from the other numbers that I see on /review) that I can't imagine how this could be the case. Perhaps there are items or queues that I do not have the privileges to see, but I don't know what those are, and finding out what they are (if that's the case) is part of this question. I've also been told in chat that it is actually the
59949
Noticed in :         is 320, shown 322. Also locked in 2013.  And then :         has a score of 179, shown 180.  has a score of 123, shown 122.  Neither of these posts got any votes recently.
88748
I was reading a question and found myself very confused. I saw that it had been edited recently by a 10k rep user and looked at the edit chain.    It seemed to me that the clarity and intent of the question was made substantially worse by the most recent edit. I don't know if this was just a one-off mistake by the high rep user. I could roll back his change to the previous version, or improve on it, but it seems like there might be a need for some kind of flag / reporting option as well - if this user has a history of misinterpreting questions and editing them for the worse, (and these hypothetical flags accumulate) should something change about their ability to edit with out review? Should I comment on the post with a request for the user to undo or fix their own change?  Not sure what my best option is.  I had initially left the post out of the question as I didn't want it to be a "I'm calling you out bro!" or a shaming kind of thing, but since it was requested and upvoted :    I think that the changes he made to the first paragraph (particularly adding the B[i] = j line) are enough of a departure from the intent of the question that it makes it more confusing.
43848
I just received an "Enthusiast" badge on Code Review.   As much as I'd like to keep the badge, I'm certain that I did not visit Code Review every day, for 30 days straight.   Is this a bug?   I don't have the "consecutive days" stat:        But I still got the badge:        And it happened again. Reported .     Update: I just received a third badge in error; this time a fanatic badge for Software Engineering. This is even stranger, since I use that site less than I do CR, and I don't recall getting the 30 days badge.
28970
I just bought "Reputation to the max". I bought this first, because I really want to help the cleanup of the vote-to-close queue, which, despite the efforts I've been hearing about, is still quite large. According to SO, my reputation is now 15,750, but that queue still says I need at least 3k rep to review! That is clearly a bug!