Main sites have button to open meta site queue.        But meta's queue page doesn't have button to go to main site queue.        Could you add it?
120495
On a , there is a link to the /review of its Meta site:        Visit the review queues on Music Fans Meta Stack Exchange.   On a , such a link to the main site’s /review is missing.  Proposal: Add a link from Meta /review to its main /review.
78780
Update:  Update: We've heard you! . Please let us know what you think.  As  In a major effort to move as much UX cheese as possible in a single deployment significantly improve the site browsing experience, we have deployed a new version of the site navigation to Stack Overflow, Meta Stack Overflow and Meta Stack Exchange.  The catch is that this is only visible to users that explicitly enable it. What's new?  This is the list of major changes we're introducing. Unified home page All major question lists have been merged into a single page, the home page. This page has three tabs: new, which shows fresh content; popular, which shows the top posts over time ranges; need answer which helps you find stuff to answer. Almost all of these lists can be filtered by tag (we are working on the remaining ones). All of them allow different sorts and sets of questions. Finally there are further options to further customize your experience. Simplified top navigation Questions is now highlighted whenever we show a list of questions, including the home page. Unanswered has been removed. FAQ How do I get this?  Go to your , look at the bottom. Check the checkbox, or un-check it to go back to normal. Checking the box puts you in a waiting list. We allow people in batches to verify behavior under load, ensure we've fresh eyes as we fix the inevitable bugs and so on. There's a five minute cache expiration time, so any change you make might take a little to propagate.  Update: As we have 500 active testers now (you are amazing!), we will delaying new alpha activations until we roll out a set of fixes. Opting in now ensures you'll be in the next few hundreds to see the next version.    Update: We have activated 500 more testers after deploying a set of fixes. There are around 1000 testers active now. There are 3000 people in the waiting list, gosh! You might need to wait a little bit.  How can I help? Here's what we really want to know :-)  that we are not breaking stuff you used to do how easy is to find questions to answer, especially if you are a new user any ideas for improvement and feature requests bug reports  If there is anything you particularly hate, but it's not a breaking behavior, please think of a better alternative and suggest it as a feature request. &lt;3 Please read this  How do I get back to you? Use this question for general considerations only. Please use separate questions tagged with   or   as appropriate.  It's impossible to manage large amounts of bug reports or feature requests if you answer here. We periodically go through the list and ask answerers to move their bug/feature answers to a question and remove the post, and you likely will lose rep once the answer is gone. What are the next steps? We will spend the next few days hot fixing bugs which emerge. New ideas and breaking behaviors will be considered for the next iteration.  Thanks for all the feedback, we've planned the next iteration now, all the requests we're going to tackle in it are marked as . The ones tagged  will be reconsidered in the next cycle. Obviously feel free to test and contribute more, the new homepage is not going away.
41425
I've just asked six questions on , and one has been referred to this site.  Looking closer, I realized that this meta site is not just for Stack&nbsp;Overflow, as it seems from its name.  I think I'll need to transfer a couple of my questions over here.  Why are the two metas (the one for Stack&nbsp;Overflow and the one for all sites) merged into one instead of being separate?
44044
Can we please move the  "Start a bounty" link to be in the same location as all of the other action buttons? It makes no sense to me for this to be buried after the comments - It's an action on the Question. It can be very difficult to locate, especially when your question gets .  I don't think this should be that difficult to implement - it's just moving the location of a design element. Can we please get this button moved?
7407
Could the magic links be updated so that we can link to help center subsections? In the past, [faq#section] used to work, now neither [help#section] nor [help/section] work.  Could this be added?    As per Nick's request, I'm starting a list of shortcuts that would be nice to have; besides the [help#anchor] → /help/anchor ones. Feel free to edit more in:   #benice →  (preferably a section link to the "be nice" section) #bounty →  #promotion →   (preferably a section link)
38048
When I try to create a new  room from , and type "meta" in the "select a site" box, I see only 8 child meta sites. Any specific reason for this?  Update:  I just noted  (pointed out by ). The conclusion of the experiment there was:        This experiment suggests that only the meta sites, for which at least   one room already exists, are offered.   ...the distinction between beta sites and graduated sites is not sufficient to explain this.      So, if I'm reading it correctly, it is currently impossible to create a room hosted on those child metas which do not already have an existing meta room (smells like a bug!)? Or is there a way to bypass this restriction somehow?  I can think of several legitimate reasons as to why a site may choose to keep their main chat rooms and meta chat rooms separate. Killing off that freedom of choice, and that too non-uniformly, isn't a good idea. If this really is a  rather than  (for a good cause), then it should be fixed!
56273
I typically like to browse through various Stack Exhange sites in which I'm not registered yet. And at times I want to see list of questions after I read one question on that site. Tapping on the site icon brings me to the left side panel, from which I cannot choose the site I'm currently at, since I'm not registered in it.  Is there a way to go to question list from the question view? Or am I missing something obvious here?
116042
I'm trying to set up tracking on a project that I'm working on.   The main site is at http://www.example.com/  The order page is at https://www.example.com/index.php   Currently they have two different profiles under separate domains:     Main Site:   UA-aaaaaaaa-1   Order Site  UA-aaaaaaaa-2   This isn't giving me the results I want. When on the order page, I would like to see where on the main page users came from. Also, when on the main page I'd like to see when they navigate away to the order page, right now I can't tell the difference between an exit and order page click.  I'm not even getting the main site as a referrer to the order page.  What am I doing wrong? Should they be under one profile? Or two like I have them. Should I be setting the domain name (_setDomainName)? Should I be using _link() when linking to the order page. I can't find the right resource for what I need.
75778
I found a user that have only . Trying to open main profile via  on the meta profile page gives 404 error. I don't think this is normal.  is currently banned in chat for 189 days:    Parent user link refers to already mentioned 404 page.
59542
I've seen this behavior on multiple meta sites, for example:        As soon as you choose to add a new login (To be honest I only tried Google, Facebook and the OpenId box), you get redirected to a 404 page at [meta site url]/users/authenticate. .  In my opinion, since when trying to login (i.e. first time login) on a meta site it redirects to the login page of its main, the "Add more logins" page on meta should also redirect to its main "add more logins" page. I think this would just make it more consistent.
92902
I've found that Stack Overflow likes to dominate the "My Sites" feed on "Filtered Questions". I've created a filter for all of the sites, without Stack Overflow. I just know that it would be nice to be able to use all sites except for ones that you don't want. I'm sure not everyone wants to take the time to click 80+ checkboxes. Even a "Select/Deselect All" in the site list would help.
28955
What I am asking here is to please remove the privilege to participate in Meta for MSE.  This privilege is literally useless. You can't really have a meta site for a meta site. There's no Meta.Meta.SE here or any other SE site out there: Meta.SE covers for every site in SE, including itself.     When users find out that you don't really get anything new, it's kinda sad for those people. There is no use for it except just to be there and fill up the space between the first and third privilege. Privileges should be shown only if you earn something new, and this privilege to participate in the meta isn't new because it's where you report problems in all of SE, including Meta.SE.    So please remove the privilege to participate in meta just for Meta.SE.    This is not a dupe as this is a feature-request to remove it, not support on why it is there.
40439
I love the  that was recently added onto Stack Exchange. However, this feature seems to be missing in per-site metas.  For instance:  Server Fault Meta:    DBA Meta    The parent websites, do have the edit/improve this post link however.
66260
I see a "review" link on the top of the page, which takes me to a few "review queues".   What is a "review queue"? What are the various queues for? What can I do in each queue?
16628
I just took a look at meta today and noticed something weird in the meta privileges. If you look at the meta privilege list, you can see that at . I know that there is no meta for meta, and the link they give you in the privilege page leads you to meta.stackexchange.com, right where you started. Why do they have this privilege? I have a feeling that this is a bad recursive joke. You must be  member of meta to get the privilege of being a member of meta! :)
55524
So I finally got my invitation (yay! It's awesome! Thanks!) and I'd like this first feature request to be typed from here.   I propose the ability to change the "favorite" sites, and also include meta sites in there.   Right now, I presume it's reading the list of sites ordered by reputation.  I propose the following:    If I am a moderator on any site, those sites and their metas should come first. After that, ordered by reputation.  The above is only the default order, and can be altered freely by the user.
22568
Abstract  There's no need to have two flag queues (one for meta, and one for main) for moderators to check.  There's also no need to have two edit queues, if suggested edits were allowed on meta sites.  We should have one flag queue and one edit queue for both main and meta SE 2.0 sites.  Background  Most of these sites have a low traffic level and low participation.  How low traffic are they?  Moderators get pinged in their global inbox for questions on Meta sites because we're desperately trying to make sure that any traffic is successful.  Our meta traffic is picking up rapidly, but it's nowhere near the point that it's sensible to check meta's  flag queue.   The Problem  The flag and edit queues are currently separate on the meta and main sites.  This reduces the flag handling time, and is yet another queue for mods to check.  The undesirability of a separate edit queue is used to justify the  on meta sites.   The Solution  The flag queue on meta should be integrated with the main site flag queue.  Additionally, suggested edits should be implemented on meta, and this queue integrated with that of the main site.