I have seen a situation where a great number of questions were being bumped to the top of the active queue as they were being edited by one person one after the other.  The reason for the edits was to link multiple questions to relevant new tags and remove incorrect tags, which was a good idea to me, but the problem with doing this is the fact that this bumps the questions to the top of the 'active' queue which everyone lands on by default when arriving on the site.  Therefore any new questions get pushed down the queue with the risk of being lost amongst the old questions.  Should edits which are just tag edits result in the question having their active status changed?
92187
While bumps are generally good, there are niche cases where they are harmful:  I recently decided I would consolidate two tags on Stack Overflow: "openoffice" and "openoffice.org". They refer to precisely the same thing, and having two tags for them just fragments the organizational structure.  However, after a couple of retags, I noticed that these questions were being bumped to the front page, clogging it up. Not wanting to be disruptive, I stopped retagging.  This prevents a very useful organizational benefit of SO's community structure. As well as consolidating two identical tags, I could do things like look at each question in "openoffice.org", and add the tag "openoffice-writer", "openoffice-calc", etc. where appropriate. Abuse would be unlikely, due to the 500 reputation minimum for retagging questions.  Update, July 2012: I think this problem is much less bothersome now that tags can have aliases. My original use-case was merging two tags, which is somewhat solved by aliases.
86728
This isn't to change to the current rejection process or review queue in any way.      There was recently a  on one of my answers.  It was correct to reject from the reviewer's point of view, because variable names in code were changed, however, the edit would have been beneficial to the post in this case, and I would have liked the suggested edit to have been accepted.  I edited my answer and manually added the rejected suggested changes myself. On this occasion it was a small edit, but this would be quite time consuming if it was a more substantial edit.    It would be useful if we had a feature where a user can approve/improve an edit on their own question or answer which was previously rejected by community review.  Ideally, there would also be the option to Edit &amp; Approve so we can change any bits if necessary.    Perhaps (for example) an option in the Suggested Edits history where only the OP, and maybe moderators, can select to approve or improve a rejected edit.   OPs can currently approve suggested edits, overruling the review queue, so this would just be an extension of that - being able to approve after 3 users have rejected.
112933
I find it not comfortable to have the order of the review sections changing all the time.  Within few seconds it changed from        to        Wouldn't it be better to have all of them in the same position, no matter the number of posts in each queue?  It assumes that the most important part is to lower the queue, although it is said there is no problem in having Close Votes with thousands of items. IMOH, most of us prefer going to one or other section (for example I like "Suggested edits") rather than to the queue with the most items, so having them changing their position makes it not that intuitive.  What do you think?
101595
I was composing a question on DBA without realising that as a new user there I would need to link my network account.  The post editor , but when I linked my account to DBA, the question edit page reappeared, but with only the very first line of the question text present. The large majority was lost.  The tag I entered also disappeared.  (Luckily, I chose to copy the text before submitting.)
943
It often occurs to me to add an edit summary to a question-edit immediately after submitting the edit, especially if the changes aren't obvious (formatting etc.). So I:   Click "edit" again. Fill in the summary Click on "Save Edits".   The 'edit' (no actual change has been made to the title/body/tags)  is accepted, but the summary doesn't show up, i.e. it is silently rejected.   I don't think it should work this way because the summary has been added by the original editor within the original edit's edit-window. In fact if I remember correctly, it to used to work as expected earlier; so perhaps this is a recent change.
107066
On some sites, and especially with new users, the format and function of the tagging system might be a bit unclear, so often tags get used incorrectly.  For example, one such issue on Arqade is the tag  - new users often type instead, something like fallout shelter ending up with the tags  and  - both of which (on Arqade) are legitimate tags, for two completely different games, and different again from the intended one.  My current understanding of how the tagging is managed is non-existent, so my suggestion might not even be possible, but what is the likelihood of adding a "service" that might detect this, and suggest the correct tag? maybe something like      Did you mean ?   To perhaps further explain, or refine my idea, some sites offer a tag suggestion, that it picks up from the text in the question (as described above). Another part of that could possibly look at the tags you are using when you ask a question, compare them (possibly by looking at the tag wikis), and suggest an alternative, based on the suggested tags, the tags used, and the similarities between the two.
122486
I was reviewing a  and decided that while the edit was incorrect, there were things to improve about the post. So I clicked “Improve” and set about my business. When I tried to submit my edit, I got the following error message, telling me that the post had been edited in the meantime by the suggester:  User already edited the body of this post; your edit must be more substantive to override the current edit.  When I tried later on a tag wiki, I got the altogether unhelpful indication that “an error has occurred”, and again no way to do anything but cancel and lose my work. But refreshing the page brought me to the suggested edit page, showing the suggested edit as approved, with no trace of my editing. (Fortunately I'd saved my text on the side!) With a , I was marked as having reviewed the suggestion, with the indication “edit” — but there was otherwise no trace of my alleged edit. So, if you improve a suggested edit and it gets approved in the meantime, you get into a situation where  there is no link to the post; if you go back, you get to what you were doing before and lose your edit; if you reload the page as instructed, you lose your edit.  The bug here is that unless you take extra precautions such as copy-pasting your edit into an external editor, you will lose your work. Expected behavior Unlike normal edit conflicts, an edit made to a suggested edit is guaranteed to be a derivative of the suggested edit - so if that edit was approved and then an &quot;improved&quot; version is submitted, that &quot;improvement&quot; edit should be applied to the post (the helpful status indicated by the checkbox shouldn't affect anything though). When two different reviewers both opt to improve a suggested edit, a conflict is unavoidable - this should be resolved based on the size of the edit, as is the normal behavior.
115809
At times questions are asked without any proper responses that are useful to the person who posts questions, even though there might be few upvoted answers. These generally get pushed back quickly given the frequency of new questions. This would cause the question to escape the view of the right person capable of answering it.  Some people would be motivated to answer unanswered questions. Some might skip going through the question if they see enough number of votes on the already answered question. Or might not make past the first few pages of the unanswered questions.  Is there a proper way to bump up the question without breaking any rules?  From :     Edit your question to provide   status and progress updates. Document   your own continued efforts to answer   your question. This will naturally   bump your question and get more people interested in it.    What does the bump here mean? Does editing the question push it up the stack in the relevant tags? Make it move to the first pages?
105362
Let's say I have  as a favourite tag and  as an ignored tag.  If somebody tags a question with both   and , it is ignored and does not appear in my list of newest questions.  I would personally like to see this question as it might be interesting / relevant to me.  Would it not make sense that the favourite tag had a higher priority than the ignored tag when there is a conflict?
97991
I think most people who come to Stack Exchange to answer others' questions - they look for the new question according to their favorite tags.  Since such behavior is a default on the Stack Exchange website - the feed of the newest questions in relevant tags would be best for most users.
44960
I was reviewing a post in the First Posts Queue when I came across a question I wanted to answer, for reference the question I am talking about is linked this one:    I noticed some easy edits that would make it look nice however when I clicked the edit button nothing happened (as if the edit link was dead).  I opened the question in a normal link and the warning regarding an edit is curently waiting popped up:    I would imagine that in the a review queue if someone tries to edit a question (as they would in a normal question) this warning should also pop up but it did not for me.  Is this a bug?
106337
As of the instant this question was posted, the tag  has zero questions, but still exists in the system and has not been cleaned up yet. Just as a curiosity, I decided to test if users without enough rep to create tags could use such zero-question tags, and it turns out they can't.  However, the error message when doing so is a nondescript "An error occurred when submitting the edit":        Can this error message be changed to something more descriptive?  Update: Apparently, another such user was able to actually suggest an edit to add this very tag, without getting an error message:
85777
I noticed  was on the Programmers.SE for a day or so without any answers.  So, I answered it.  Not long after that, it was migrated to SO.  I was surprised to find that it was not located on the first several pages after being migrated.  It seems that it's .  A large reason for putting new questions at the top of the list is so that enthusiastic answerers can jump at the ones that interest them right out of the gate.  However, a question that's migrated is nearly hidden from these most eager answerers, because the question jumps immediately to a sad page that is normally full of questions that people have either answered or deliberately passed over.  Should newly-migrated questions get a chance at being displayed prominently along with their newly-posted counterparts?  EDIT: To be clear, I am not asking what the current behavior is (which has already been asked and answered in another question). I am asking if the current behavior best serves the SO community.
106181
I've seen this a few times now but so far I skipped such suggested edits, because I'm unsure what to do.  Right now in the "Suggested Edits" queue, there are a bunch of questions where the tags  and  are replaced by . These are all suggested by the same user.  Assuming that the questions themselves don't require improvements, how should I review these suggested edits?
87758
Note: Somewhat related to .  As a Suggested Edits queue reviewer, it's frustrating when reviewing a question that requires an edit, and going to edit only to find that you're not able due to a pending edit.  Of course, if I hadn't used up all 20 edits from the queue in this day, I would be able to either Accept or Improve the edit with my own changes. However when all of the edits are used up, this leaves no option but to move on which is fairly limiting. It's made worse when the pending edit doesn't actually address what you wanted to change.    Is there any way to bypass this limitation? (That is, of course, without refreshing endlessly waiting for the edit to be approved or rejected to make your own)
95139
This seemed to pop up at the same time as . Suddenly, asker's profile information is being pushed to the next line if the tags take up too much room:  I can't remember how this was handled previously, but I've never seen the profile pushed to the next line like that. I think the tags used to just go over-top of the card?  Edge, Version 91.0.864.41 (Official build) (64-bit)   More examples:      Easy way to reproduce this bug: Search for some long tags.  and  are good candidates.
69907
Many times in the past I've edited a somewhat recent answer—say, from 30 minutes ago—and noticed that the concomitant question didn't bump to the top.  I just confirmed it with ; the question is currently sorted in the JavaScript page based on when it was asked, not my edit.  I've never made edits just to bump a question to whore rep—my original answer was wrong which was why I fixed it—but my understanding is that the CW self-edit trigger exists to prevent  edit-then-bump-then-score-rep—profit! activity.    If non-ancient edits no longer bump a question, should the self-edit CW trigger be brought inline with this?  Should an answer be made CW if you make 10 edits that actually bump the question?  and to avoid any implication of impropriety, I'm already capped on SO, so I'm not looking for any sort of "meta effect" on my answer