I am trying to push a repository onto Github, but I cannot as "large files are detected". The largest file is only 38 MB! There should be no problem.   However, the error states that the file datafiles/FILENAME.json is 2016.04 MB, and is still in this subdirectory. But I have deleted this! I have also used git commit, so those changes should be committed.   I go into the subdirectory (which has already been initialized with git init). I then try to use sudo git push origin master.   This is the error I get after $ sudo git push origin master:  Counting objects: 19, done.  Delta compression using up to 4 threads.  Compressing objects: 100% (18/18), done.  Writing objects: 100% (19/19), 1.69 GiB | 385.00 KiB/s, done.  Total 19 (delta 9), reused 0 (delta 0)  remote: error: GH001: Large files detected. You may want to try Git Large File Storage - https://git-lfs.github.com.  remote: error: Trace: b2274b496089a760fae877fdaf3d8b23  remote: error: See http://git.io/iEPt8g for more information.  remote: error: File datafiles/FILENAME.json is 2016.04 MB; this exceeds GitHub's file size limit of 100.00 MB   What is the problem?
15887
I accidentally committed an unwanted file (filename.orig while resolving a merge) to my repository several commits ago, without me noticing it until now. I want to completely delete the file from the repository history.   Is it possible to rewrite the change history such that filename.orig was never added to the repository in the first place?
65696
I recently followed some instructions to reset GitHub for Windows by deleting two folders found within %AppData% and %LocalAppData%, and I've seen these paths before, but never understood them, and searching for them didn't yield the information I wanted to find. What does the percent sign mean in file paths on Windows, as opposed to navigating to C:\Users\etc, and what are the folders %AppData% and %LocalAppData%?
83370
Let's say I have a file that's 4'x12' and represents a space on an actual wall. I want to open certain files (of different sizes) and drag each file into the large file in order to arrange the images correctly on the computer before physically hanging the framed finals.  When I drag a new image into the larger file, the new image's size and the size of its copy don't match. That is, Say I drag an 8x10 into the large file, well on the large file (trying to control size with guides and rulers) the new image is some other size, but not the right one.   What am I doing wrong? How do I make sure that when I click and drag the new image that it will be properly represented?
55442
While creating a 250GiB backup partition for my data, I have noticed lots of discrepancies between reported partition size and free space in Nautilus, gParted, df, tune2fs, etc.  At first I thought it was a GiB / GB confusion. It was not.  Then I thought it could be ext4's reserved blocks. It was not.  Im completely puzzled. Here are some images. Here are the steps:   First, NTFS. 524288000 sectors x 512 bytes/sector = 268435456000 bytes = 268.4 GB = 250 GiB.      Nautilus say "Total Capacity: 250.0 GB" (even though its actually GiB, not GB). Apart from that minor mislabeling, so far, so good   Now, same partition, formated as ext4 with gparted:     First, Last and Total sectors are the same. It IS the same 250GiB partition. Used size is 4.11GiB (reserved blocks maybe?)    Nope. Looks like reserved blocks are 12.7 GiB (~5%. ouch!). But... why Total Capacity is now only 246.1 GiB ???. That difference (sort of) matches the 4.11 GiB reported by gparted. But... if its not from reserved blocks, what is it? And why gparted didnt report that 12.7GiB of used space?  $ df -h /dev/sda5 Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda5             247G  188M  234G   1% /media/BACKUP   df matches Nautilus in reported free space. But.. only 188M used? Shouldnt it be ~12GB? And total capacity is still wrong. So i ran tune2fs to find some clues. (irrelevant output is ommited)  $ sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sda5 tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) Filesystem volume name:   BACKUP Filesystem UUID:          613d592e-47f5-4206-96a7-210090d340ef Filesystem features:      has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize Filesystem flags:         signed_directory_hash  Filesystem state:         clean Filesystem OS type:       Linux Block count:              65536000 Reserved block count:     3276800 Free blocks:              64459851 First block:              0 Block size:               4096   65536000 total blocks * 4096 bytes/block = 268435456000 bytes = 268.4 GB = 250 GiB. It matches gparted.  3276800 reserved blocks = 13421772800 bytes = 13.4 GB = 12.5 GiB. It (again, sort of) matches Nautilus.  64459851 free blocks = 264027549696 bytes = 264.0 GB = 245.9 GiB. Why? Shouldnt it be either 250-12.5 = 237.5 (or 250-(12.5+4.11)=~233) ?  Removing reserved blocks:  $ sudo tune2fs -m 0 /dev/sda5 tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) Setting reserved blocks percentage to 0% (0 blocks)  $ sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sda5 tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) Filesystem volume name:   BACKUP Filesystem UUID:          613d592e-47f5-4206-96a7-210090d340ef Filesystem features:      has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize Filesystem flags:         signed_directory_hash  Filesystem state:         clean Filesystem OS type:       Linux Block count:              65536000 Reserved block count:     0 Free blocks:              64459851 Block size:               4096   As expected, same block count, 0 reserved blocks, but... same free blocks? Didnt I just freed 12.5 GiB ?  $ df -h /dev/sda5 Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda5             247G  188M  246G   1% /media/BACKUP     Looks like I did. Avaliable space went up from 233 to 245.9 GiB. gparted didnt care at all, showing exactly same info! (useless to post an identical screenshot)  What a huge mess!  I tried to document it as best as I could... So, please can someone give me any clue on what's going on here?   What are those misterious 4.11 GiB missing from NTFS -> ext4 formatting? Why there are so many discrepancies between gparted, Nautilus, tune2fs, df? What is wrong with my math? (questions in bold scattered this post)   Any help is appreciated. While I can not figure what is going on, I am serilously considering giving up on ext4 in favor of NTFS for everything but my / partition.  Thanks!
99674
This is a situation I am frequently in:   I have a source server with a 320GB hard-drive inside of it, and 16GB of ram (, but as this is an issue I run into frequently on other machines as well, I would prefer the answer to work on any "reasonable" Linux machine) I have a backup server with several terabytes of hard-drive space (, see disclaimer above)   I want to transfer 320GB of data from the source server to the target server (specifically, the data from /dev/sda).   The two computers are physically next to each other, so I can run cables between them. I'm on a LAN, and , which means my network speeds should "ideally" be 1000Mbit, right? Security is not an issue. I am on a local network, and I trust all machines on the network, including the router. (optional) I don't necessarily need a signed checksum of the data, but basic error checking (such as dropped packets, or the drive becoming unreadable) should be detected rather than just disappear into the output.     I searched for this question online, and have tested several commands. The one that appears the most often is this:  ssh user@192.168.1.100 'dd bs=16M if=/dev/sda | gzip' &gt; backup_sda.gz   This command has proven too slow (it ran for an hour, only got about 80GB through the data). It took about 1 minute and 22 seconds for the 1GB test packet, and ended up being twice as fast when not compressed. The results may also have been skewed by the fact that the transferred file is less than the amount of RAM on the source system.  Moreover (and this was tested on 1GB test pieces), I'm getting issues if I use the gzip command and dd; the resulting file has a different checksum when extracted on the target, than it does if piped directly. I'm still trying to figure out why this is happening.
68855
I've moved a file manually and then I've modified it. According to Git, it is a new file and a removed file. Is there any way to force Git into treating it as a file move?
32040
Has anyone had any success connecting things like content builder or cloud pages to GitHub? I have been searching far and wide and have come across this amazing repository that almost does what I need (). The reason being as our organization grows and things become more complex we would love the ability to track changes and have reviewers before things are published. Most of my experience comes from GitHub and I am struggling to find any source of versioning within SFMC. Any recommendations would be helpful!
1619
I have a Linux CentOS server, the OS+packages used around 5GB. Then, I transferred 97GB data from a Windows server to two folders on this Linux server, after calculated the disk usage, I see the total size of the two folders is larger than the disk used size.  Run du -sh on each folder, one use 50GB, the other one use 47GB  But run df -h, the used space is 96GB. (50GB + 47GB + 5GB) > 96GB  Is there any problem? Those two folders contain lots of files (1 million+). Thanks.
85413
Possible Duplicates:             df -h says that I have 494G used on /var:  Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda3             564G  494G   41G  93% /var   But du -sh /var says it's 350G  What makes them different?
26460
When I've worked a bit with my source code, I did my usual thing commit and then I pushed to a remote repository. But then I noticed I forgot to organize my imports in the source code. So I do the amend command to replace the previous commit:  &gt; git commit --amend   Unfortunately the commit can't be pushed back to the repository. It is rejected like this:  &gt; git push origin To //my.remote.repo.com/stuff.git/  ! [rejected]        master -&gt; master (non-fast forward) error: failed to push some refs to '//my.remote.repo.com/stuff.git/'   What should I do? (I can access the remote repository.)
67057
I have a big HTML file that causes no errors in most of the browsers. However, when I open it with, let's say, Google Chrome, the program shuts down and I cannot trace why this is happening.   This HTML file is quite big and cannot be posted to a question in SO, but it should be ran as a whole as I cannot trace where the problem is. What is/are the most appropriate file upload website/s to upload and paste the link into the question?
54398
When sending large email to a new CentOS6 server running Postfix as the MTA, the following message is returned:  tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 5.3.4 Error: message file too big (state 18)  I found the following , but am unclear as to where it needs to be added in the main.cf file:  This was caused by Postfix and it's limit on not only messages but mailbox sizes. I had to add this setting in /etc/postfix/main.cf: message_size_limit = 31457280  How can the maximum mail size (including attachments) be increased in Postfix?
76729
I noticed that the these two commands to list files below 5 GiB produce different results:  find . -type f -size -5368709120c find . -type f -size -5G   Specifically the one that uses kilobyte unit (5368709120c) returns additional files that are larger than the maximum file size returned by the one that uses the GiB unit (5G).  From the find manual page I read the following:  -size n[cwbkMG]           File uses n units of space.  The following suffixes can be used:           `b'    for 512-byte blocks (this is the default if no suffix is used)           `c'    for bytes           `w'    for two-byte words           `k'    for Kilobytes (units of 1024 bytes)           `M'    for Megabytes (units of 1048576 bytes)           `G'    for Gigabytes (units of 1073741824 bytes)  The size does not count indirect blocks, but it does count blocks  in sparse files that are not actually allocated.  Bear in mind that the `%k' and `%b' format specifiers of -printf handle sparse files differently.   The  `b'  suffix always denotes 512-byte blocks and never 1 Kilobyte blocks,  which is different to the behaviour of -ls.   So, given that the unit of G is 1073741824, 5G should be 5368709120c. Is the issue due to how sparse or indirect blocks are counted?  Thanks in advance for the help.
30271
Yesterday I was copying a single, 8 GB file to a USB with a slow, 7 MB/s write speed, while my RAM is 3 GB. While copying the system froze, to the point where I couldn't even move the cursor.  I managed to log into the text console, and ran iotop, it showed that a process named kswapd0 was taking 99.99% of IO.  Are there workarounds so copying a large file doesn't make my system unusable?
43425
It started happening today... all of a sudden, no apparent reason!  Here's the output from df:   assp:~# df -k Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/simfs             6291456   1378384   4913072  22% / tmpfs                  8202680         0   8202680   0% /lib/init/rw tmpfs                  8202680         0   8202680   0% /dev/shm  assp:~# df -i Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/simfs           55781934   83005 55698929    1% / tmpfs                2050670       2 2050668    1% /lib/init/rw tmpfs                2050670       1 2050669    1% /dev/shm  assp:~# df -h Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/simfs            6.0G  1.4G  4.7G  22% / tmpfs                 7.9G     0  7.9G   0% /lib/init/rw tmpfs                 7.9G     0  7.9G   0% /dev/shm   Here's an actual entry from /var/log/mail.warn:   Dec 11 17:55:37 assp postfix/smtpd[30614]: warning: not enough free space in mail queue: 0 bytes &lt; 1.5*message size limit Dec 11 17:55:37 assp postfix/cleanup[30617]: warning: 4361D850D54: write queue file: No space left on device   .
26039
I have a home file server that I use Ubuntu on.  Recently, one of my drives filled up so I got another and threw it in there.  I have a very large folder, the directory is about 1.7 T in size and contains a decent amount of files.  I used  to COPY the files from the old drive to the new one and it seems to have worked fine.  I want to now validate the new directory on the new drive against the original directory on the old drive before I delete the data from the old drive to free up space. I understand that I can do a CRC check to do this.  How, specifically, can I do this?
52837
I am having a hard time figuring out where the problem is with my code/workflow. I previously posted this question , but then the same problem came straight back. When I run it in tex, I get an error input limit exceeded. The exact log is pasted below:  This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.17 (MiKTeX 2.9.6210 64-bit) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2017.1.26)  26 JAN 2017 20:45 entering extended mode **./master.tex (master.tex LaTeX2e &lt;2016/03/31&gt; patch level 3 Babel &lt;3.9r&gt; and hyphenation patterns for 75 language(s) loaded. ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\base\article.cls" Document Class: article 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\base\size11.clo" File: size11.clo 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX file (size option) ) \c@part=\count79 \c@section=\count80 \c@subsection=\count81 \c@subsubsection=\count82 \c@paragraph=\count83 \c@subparagraph=\count84 \c@figure=\count85 \c@table=\count86 \abovecaptionskip=\skip41 \belowcaptionskip=\skip42 \bibindent=\dimen102 ) ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\apacite\apacite.sty" Package: apacite 2013/07/21 v6.03 APA citation \c@BibCnt=\count87 \bibleftmargin=\skip43 \bibindent=\skip44 \bibparsep=\skip45 \bibitemsep=\skip46 \biblabelsep=\skip47 ) No file master.aux. \openout1 = `master.aux'.  LaTeX Font Info:    Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    ... okay on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    ... okay on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    ... okay on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    ... okay on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    ... okay on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info:    ... okay on input line 5. \c@maskedRefs=\count88 ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\apacite\english.apc" File: english.apc 2013/07/21 v6.03 apacite language file LaTeX Info: Redefining \BPBI on input line 129. LaTeX Info: Redefining \BHBI on input line 130. ) ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [input stack size=5000]. \AtBeginDocument #1-&gt;#1  l.5 \begin{document}  If you really absolutely need more capacity, you can ask a wizard to enlarge me.   Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:  641 strings out of 493333  7639 string characters out of 3139188  74825 words of memory out of 3000000  4254 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+200000  3940 words of font info for 15 fonts, out of 3000000 for 9000  1141 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191  5000i,0n,4998p,136b,36s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,50000s !  ==&gt; Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!   I previously posted this question and thought I solved it but am having the same problem again.   The latex code I am trying to execute is below:   \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article} \usepackage{apacite} \nocite{*}  \begin{document}   % title page. Edit as needed for future publications.  \title{Research Proposal} \author{Teererai Marange \\ Department of Computer Science \\ University of Auckland\\ \texttt{t.marange@auckland.ac.nz}} \date{January 26, 2017} \maketitle % end title page.    % abstract goes here \newpage \begin{abstract} Abstract goes here  \end{abstract} \newpage   % table of contents  \tableofcontents \newpage   %begin introduction  \section {Introduction} Lorem Ipsum Doremifaso   %\cite{Nedakeyword} use to cite     %references our biliography. This must go whereever we use our bibtex references  \bibliography{references} \bibliographystyle{apacite}   \end{document}   and the bib file that I am using to build the bibliography is below:   @misc{wikipedia1,   title = "Scripting language",   author = "Wikipedia",   url = {http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_language},   year = 2014, }