I have three pending "other" flags from February 26th (week ago) that have not yet been reviewed. Is this because of anything I have done, or are the new mods already backed up?
121161
Is there a limit on how long a flag (on a question/answer, not on a comment) can wait for a moderator's attention?  Does it vary from site to site (I believe it may take longer on SO)?
74286
I think I just witnessed a moderator decline a flag raised on his own comment. (I'm hesitant to discuss specifics unless I have to, as I don't mean to put anyone in a negative light.)  Since there are at least 2 other moderators per site, I'm not sure this should be allowed—I feel that either   only uninvolved moderator(s) should be able to view and handle flags on co-moderators' posts, or moderators should be able to view all flags, but a flagged moderator should not be allowed to decline a flag against him- or herself.   I have no personal issue with this moderator. I just felt in this case that there was truth in both sides (the moderator's as well as the flagging user's), and sought a win-win solution, i.e. by improving the disputed answer. Coming back an hour later to see that the moderator unilaterally declined the user's flag—that didn't seem fair to the user...  I am making some assumptions based on the "Last Seen" stat in the moderator tools, so if I'm simply mistaken on what happened, I apologize in advance.
21610
Update , but there appears to be no documentation out there. The change in flag weight caused by each flagging still missing. TL;DR: Flag weight is not very clear. Just telling the user how many flags got approved/rejected would increase the flagging behavior. Additionally, flag feedback could improve this even more. Question:  is shown on a User's profile as a number between 0 and 750, each user starts with 100. The problem is that after reaching 500, flag weight increases in a sub-linear fashion, and it becomes hard to tell how many flags were considered to be correct or incorrect. I find it easy to remember &quot;I am at 250&quot; and when I come back, discover &quot;I am at 280&quot;, so I had 3 flags approved. Nowadays, &quot;I am at 576.3529&quot;. When I view my profile tomorrow, I'll be at 577.1285 or something, but I won't know how many flags got approved, denied or were ignored.  Would &quot;10 flags approved, 3 flags denied, 2 flags pending&quot; not provide more useful information? Even if it's just a pop-up box (StackExchange seems to use span-title for that). Additionally, being able to see what flags were denied would provide feedback to the user that is flagging in a way not desired by the moderator(s), and improve the flagging quality.  Maybe we can click on the flag weight to see a page with all our flags, the status (approved/denied/pending), the moderator that reviewed the flag, and maybe a comment the moderator left to explain why the flag was denied?
17713
I checked my  to see whether I can find something similar to the main-site flag-history for chat-flags, but didn't find anything. I recently had the (dis)pleasure of regularly having to deal with a user, that has been deleted multiple times. Whenever they show up (with the same nick-name) again I have to flag them again. I'd like to get an overview of how often I had to do that, and whether my flags were helpful for the moderators. As such I propose the implementation of a flag-history as it is already in place for the main-site for chat-flags, that request moderator intervention. To be completely clear I am not talking about the 10k user flags, which are acted on in a matter of sometimes seconds with instantly visible results, but about moderator attention flags from this menu:
119704
Several minutes ago there was a  asked on SO, which when originally posted, was just a terrible post, which was hard to determine what was being asked, and there was absolutely no details provided, for which I flagged it as Low-Quality. The OP has less then 10k rep.  This was the entirety of the original post:     I am working on an app which should run only once after the Installation,Even the launcher should be disabled after I quit it   In my Flag-History, I am now seeing that the flag was deemed disputed, and I am confused as to why.  I read that if a post is flagged of low quality, and it is edited, the flags become disputed because they are supposedly supposed to mark questions that are irrecoverable by edits..  The question has since undergone 3 edits by the OP, none of which added much information that would help the community to help them, and the question has also been Closed as not a real question, yet my flag is still marked as disputed..  Does this non-helpful flag have any affect on my flag-history?
9082
It looks as if the 10k-tools flagged post list is b0rken.  Next to the review link in the toolbar there is a flag counter showing there are 10 flags to be reviewed:    Clicking on that flag counter leads to an empty page:        The moment I visit that page (through clicking on the flags counter, or by going to the review queue first then clicking on Tools, selecting the flags tab if not already selected), the flags counter disappears from the toolbar:    but after a while (half an hour, an hour?) the flag count re-appears in the toolbar.  Either the counter is wrong (presumably taken from a Redis cache somewhere) or the 10k flag review page is falling over every time someone tries to load it.  This at first appeared to happen only on Meta, on Stack Overflow the flags page has plenty to review. However, there are now  on Stack Overflow.
1783
Here is the close queue:        Here is an active flag I have:        I currently have 5 flags pending in the close queue. Some, like this one, are months old. This doesn't feel right and may discourage newer users from flagging things that need attention with the assumption that a flag may be ignored for 4 months, so why bother?  Here are some possibilities:   Bump flags that have been languishing for more than 30 days to the front of the close queue (or weight questions with said flags a bit higher). Won't solve the issue, but will make it less egregious Punishing a misbehaving mod by forcing them to go through every sub-3000 user's flagged close votes in the queue and free them from flag limbo , "a new 10K flag list for "stuck" flags, which would be any close flag that is unhandled within 30 days."   This question has been heavily edited under the assumption that flags didn't get refreshed every day. Apparently they do, thanks to Bill and Asheesh, so sorry about the misdirection. Languishing flags still an issue though!
22216
Just like , which was marked as . But today, it's not working again. I'm still notified of new badges:      Update: it looks like new events are now updated; reputation events from earlier this UTC afternoon are still missing:
21391
I went to flag something, and in the flag dialog I got the message  "Your last flag was declined - please review it before flagging this post!"    That's all well and good, but when I went to review my flags, the statement is not accurate.  My last 5 flags were all marked 'helpful'.  The 6th down the list is marked 'declined', but that wasn't my last flag.  The message should probably be modified to correspond to the actual condition that triggers it.  Perhaps it should say     One of your flags was recently declined - please review it before flagging this post!   I'm going to guess that this message is triggered if, of all the flags of mine that have been handled by a moderator, the one that was most recently handled was declined. This isn't necessarily the last flag that I raised (the one I raised most recently), as moderators might handle them in a different order than I raised them, and it's not necessarily the flag at the top of the list.  Thus, calling it my "last" flag seems like it could cause confusion.  Yes, I realize this is extremely minor.
85868
When reviewing flags, either from the queue or from the flagged post, I often want to know what the flagger could have done in addition to, or instead of, flagging for mod attention.  Does he have the rep to downvote?  To comment?  To vote to delete?  Knowing this doesn't necessarily affect how I handle the flag, but if there's a possible teaching moment there I use the flag response to point it out.  But I can't find this out unless I click through to the user's profile (unless I already know this user, of course).  Would it be possible to get the flagger's reputation in a tooltip, like what's already done for comments?
2762
The Problem  Currently if I flag a post, I cannot check the status of the flag unless I have prior helpful flags. This means, for example, that a new user who wants to check the status of his first flag cannot do so while it is pending (active).  This feature request is based on my experience on MSO, where I wanted to check the status of my flag but could not get to the summary page without cheating (tweaking my SO link to work with MSO). It also stems from this question, where the OP indicates he had the same issue:   My Proposal  If I have flagged any post, then show me a "flags" link (red arrow in image below). If I have any helpful flags, then the number of helpful flags should be displayed (blue arrow). If I have not flagged anything, then neither should be displayed (as with current site functionality).
16447
I flagged a  yesterday as a duplicated question and now its status is set to eventinvalidated. I can see this in my Flagging History section.  I'm not sure I understand what it means since the post is still there and has not been deleted. It's the first time I have seen this status.  Could someone enlighten me about that?
77012
I accidentally flagged  as a duplicate of , when I intended to flag it as a duplicate of . I am presented with the message "You have already flagged this post for moderator attention" whenever I try to replace the incorrect duplicate flag. Is there any way that I can fix this mistake, even though Stack Overflow is preventing me from fixing it?
123955
Have a look at revision 6 of . How about adding "flag" buttons for individual revisions? Or should I just flag the question itself, category "other", and specify the revision in the text? (That's what I ended up doing.)
104562
seems to be making edits to his own questions and saying that he's flagging them for deletion (not sure about the flagging part though since I don't have enough rep for that, but that's according to his newly edited questions. However according to his reputation - 10 currently - he shouldn't even have flagging privileges yet).  I stumbled upon one of his questions in the close queue, it had an accepted answer so I reverted the question back one step, and having seen that he's done the same thing to multiple questions I'm not sure about how this should be handled. I am not sure about if he has access to the delete button on his own questions or not.  As I'm not sure how to handle this I wanted to bring it to the community's attention and ask for support for how to handle future cases like this. Should all questions be reverted back? Should they be closed (possibly with the motivation "user seems to want this question gone")?
111422
I was just reviewing the  and I came across  and flag description:    The answer has been flagged as very low quality and then it also has a flag that says:     It's not an answer, or at least not to this question, however this was accepted instead of the real answer. – May 7 '12 at 5:53  × 4   Now I am in the review queue a lot and I don't recall ever seeing this before, is this an other flag that is being shown?  What is this unusual description that I am seeing?
10578
I flagged a post and (choose one)   my flag was marked as helpful, yet nothing was done my flag was marked as declined, yet the post was deleted/edited/closed   Why?