On a site where I have less than 2k reputation, I suggested an edit to a post in the First Posts or Late Answers queue. The first time I click the Edit button under the post and then save my edits, everything works as it should. But then after I've submitted my edit, I noticed that I missed something in my edit. Then I clicked on the Edit button again to edit the things I've missed. When I clicked Save Edits again, it took me out of the review queue to the question page.  I also tested this on a site where I have more than 2k reputation, and everything works fine there.  Steps to reproduce:   Review First Posts or Late Answers on a site where you have less than 2k reputation Suggest an edit to the post and submit your edit by clicking the Save Edits button Click the Edit button again on the same post after submitting the edit Do some more changes to your edit and click the Save Edits button again You will find yourself on the question page outside of the review queue
120913
When reviewing the First Posts (and Late Answers) review queue, after you suggest an edit, you're back in the review queue and the I'm Done button is activated. So far, so good, but when I realize I want to edit something else as well (I often forget the tags), I can click the 'edit' link again. When I'm done improving my suggested edit, I'm suddenly outside the review queue.    This does not happen if you have enough reputation (2k) to edit posts straight away; then you always stay in the review queue.
97179
I am not sure if this is a bug or a design error, but I came across this issue on Robotics. I assume that the same code is employed across the various SE sites, so I am posting my question here. I submitted an answer to  at 16:26.    I then suggested an edit to the question at 17:03. However, it was not until 20 hours later, at 13:03, that the edit was approved, so I appear to have missed out on the &quot;Explainer&quot; badge, as the edit should be done within 12 hours.    I don't know the reason for the delay, as I do not have a low approval rating:    I'm not bothered about missing out on the badge, nor am I criticising the reviewers - after all, we all do this in our free time. However, it does seem that the algorithm for the badge relies on the approval time, in lieu of the submit time, which does not seem to be correct, as the badge then becomes dependant upon the reviewer's availability/responsiveness, rather than upon the actions of the answerer/editor.  TL;DR Should the badge also check if the edit was caused by a suggested edit and, in those cases, look at the time it was suggested rather than the time it was eventually approved?
87686
I improved (from review) a suggested edit on , and after revisiting the question realised I missed something... no problem, I'll just edit the question again right? Apparently not. This is the current state of the question (the result of my edit improvement):    However when I hit the edit button I get this:    Which is wrong. It took me a minute to figure out that it's actually giving me the body of the edit that I improved (revision 2), when it should of course be giving me the most recent revision (revision 3).     I checked a few other &quot;improved&quot; edits and can't reproduce this on any other post so it's not (at least not only) a result of the improved edit. So, what's going on?
83611
I came across  on hold question and decided to edit it to keep it open. It is very badly written and therefore the edit took quite a bit of an effort to write. My suggested edit is now in the question comments.  When I was done writing, I tried to submit the edit for approval as my rep is rather low on this site. I was told my edit changes too much. I don't understand why this should refrain me from submitting this edit for approval by a moderator.  Can anyone explain to my why this message exists? I feel this should go into the moderator queue like any other edit.  Edit: I managed to edit the question at a later time, which is even weirder.
113948
I read a question, thought it was interesting, voted it up. It needed some editing, so I started fixing all the grammar mistakes, added punctuation, improved sentence structure; I realized that the quality of this question was very low - it felt like the OP didn't put any effort into it at all - no evidence of research was provided, and a very unclear question was asked.   I changed my mind about the upvote, but I couldn't change my vote until the post was edited. In a couple of minutes my edit was accepted, and I was able to change it to a downvote.  Is it normal? It just seems weird that your own edit can let you change your vote on a question.
18770
I have been editing few questions on Stack Overflow for formatting and spelling mistakes. But I have noticed, that after my edits, some other user also edits the same question and his name shows up as the last edited person on the question.   Since I had already edited that same question, does my edit count be +1 for such edits too and count towards my total no. of edits? Similarly for cases where my edits have been rolled back by the OP, even in that case does my edit count increase by 1?  Additionally, if I edit same question again twice, does my edit count be increased by 2?
69907
Many times in the past I've edited a somewhat recent answer—say, from 30 minutes ago—and noticed that the concomitant question didn't bump to the top.  I just confirmed it with ; the question is currently sorted in the JavaScript page based on when it was asked, not my edit.  I've never made edits just to bump a question to whore rep—my original answer was wrong which was why I fixed it—but my understanding is that the CW self-edit trigger exists to prevent  edit-then-bump-then-score-rep—profit! activity.    If non-ancient edits no longer bump a question, should the self-edit CW trigger be brought inline with this?  Should an answer be made CW if you make 10 edits that actually bump the question?  and to avoid any implication of impropriety, I'm already capped on SO, so I'm not looking for any sort of "meta effect" on my answer
3805
I downvoted an answer 17 seconds after it was posted, and left. I came back 17 minutes later (what a coincidence) and the post had been edited, but the system didn't let me undo my vote. I believe it was because the edits took place during the grace period and weren't registered. Is that so? I wish I were able to remove my downvote.
64117
For example,  edit was proposed to an answer to my question. The bug is I see the checkmark when I go to this edit (I can't click checkmark however).
86728
This isn't to change to the current rejection process or review queue in any way.      There was recently a  on one of my answers.  It was correct to reject from the reviewer's point of view, because variable names in code were changed, however, the edit would have been beneficial to the post in this case, and I would have liked the suggested edit to have been accepted.  I edited my answer and manually added the rejected suggested changes myself. On this occasion it was a small edit, but this would be quite time consuming if it was a more substantial edit.    It would be useful if we had a feature where a user can approve/improve an edit on their own question or answer which was previously rejected by community review.  Ideally, there would also be the option to Edit &amp; Approve so we can change any bits if necessary.    Perhaps (for example) an option in the Suggested Edits history where only the OP, and maybe moderators, can select to approve or improve a rejected edit.   OPs can currently approve suggested edits, overruling the review queue, so this would just be an extension of that - being able to approve after 3 users have rejected.
40445
In the last few weeks, the 'review' button at the top of stackoverflow.com has become very slow. I can count to 20 in some cases (but not always).   In a perhaps related phenomenon, I believe that test questions in the queue often trigger a level of extreme slowness all their very own. If I click on a queue, or 'next' after a review, and the periods sit there throbbing for a good long time, chances are that what will show up will be a review audit.
94108
Just now I edited an answer and got four points instead of two.    I checked , but I already had a few other suggested edits approved, and it has always been two points...  Here is the question:    Is this a bug?  Update:  Checking the revisions, I can see two revisions, both at same time and the content is also the same. Links are also identical. Possibly this is the cause of the issue I feel:
52040
I found this , but I am not sure if this is the same issue.  On , I did some reformatting of the indentation in the code block to make it a bit more readable and it was  for peer review. A few minutes later, it appears the OP made an edit that added some additional code. It looks like my suggested edit was applied when the OP saved his/her edit, and it looks like he got the "credit" for the edit.  I'm not really concerned about the 2 rep points; I'm more curious why this happened and if this is a bug (or limitation) in the editing feature, or if this is known/intended behavior?  Note that this is not a suggested edit that's overridden by a concurrent edit: the recorded edit starts from the post-suggested edit state (and in fact can be identical to it, as in  ).
118501
In the last week+ I've edited a lot of posts (through seeing many issues) and earned reasonable rep for it (despite accepted edits in the suggested queue). But, for some reason, I no-longer earn rep for editing... I noticed this in the last 24 hours and I'd like to know why?  I've had both the time and inclination to edit posts - Because I feel I'm contributing, earning rep and also because I believe it's valuable to others (if a post is clearer, even by a marginal amount, then people are more likely to readily understand, comment and answer!).   My edits have included many corrections including, but not limited to:   Correcting or enabling code display (through poor markdown) Improving formatting Grammar and associated issues Plural usage and punctuation Etc.   And in various combinations.  ... But never removing or correcting the manner in which the OP communicates. Sometimes, I find myself wanting to just apply the &lt;code&gt; tag to missed opportunities, but I can't (yet).  Sure, there are probably instances of edits where I've done little to improve a post; but sometimes a 'little' counts, but I'm confused as to why I'm no-longer receiving rep for my efforts...  Is there some sort of imposed/modded limit/flag for users editing too many posts or with too many rejected edits?
44131
I've been occasionally seeing the same post show up in both First Post and Late Answers review queues, and I'm wondering what the expected behavior is if it appears again - should I flag it a 2nd time as a poor posting in the 2nd review category or just always press skip? It's tempting to flag again and have that count as an additional review but I don't want to annoy moderators this would come across as abusive double flagging.  I'm also wondering why review would show it to me a 2nd time if I've already indicated it has a problem in another review category, is that intentional for some reason or just maybe something that happens infrequently enough to not be worth coding a filter for?  Sorry If this has been asked before in a different way, I searched around for a bit and these were the closest questions I could find but didn't address showing up in multiple review categories:
93134
I just got a review audit where the "late answer" was a duplicate of the accepted answer, but flagging it on that basis failed the review. That seems like a bug to me.  Question here:   I found that by clicking the question to view the entire Q&amp;A, and noticed that the copy was from a generic "user12345" account (probably with 1 rep as well) and the original from a real-looking account. Viewing the whole Q&amp;A is often useful when reviewing, especially late answers (which are often repeats of earlier points, disagreements with those, or random addendums better submitted as edits). I looked at the duplicate and thought "weird, rep harvesting maybe?" so I clicked "needs moderator attention" and wrote "copy and paste of accepted answer". FAIL!  I think that this review type can't ever work, because to avoid the problem I found you'd need to make up whole new "late answers" which by definition the review bot can't know anything useful about. Either that or to pass you'd just need to take any action at all, including upvoting the original of the duplicated answer. Which I didn't do, BTW, because I had no idea or opinion about the question or answer.  (this is not a duplicate of "What are review tests", it predates that and focuses on a particular defect within the process. See the comments below).
66616
I edited  and noticed my reputation change from 1466 to 1470 (i.e +4). I went to check my reputation changes and found:        Note: My reputation later went down from 1470 to 1468, so it appears the system realized it made a mistake and corrected my reputation, but hasn't gotten rid of the second revision or the history event.  My  still shows 1 suggested edit with 2 revisions.