Is this video a one time link? I realize it's still very new and we're all still working out the kinks and such but I was able to view and share it once, then I deleted it. Now when I go back to the link, it just thanks me and the video is no longer there. So is there no chance of viewing this again or what??
38260
I was able to successfully create and share the FB Lookback movie, but had to delete it when I saw a picture had been included that should not be shared (someone with their ex).    After deleting the picture I tried to go back to  but it now only gives me a still collage of 6 pictures.  Does anyone know how to get a second chance at the movie?
9411
I've seen .  Voting to undelete will not work because it was deleted by a moderator, but I managed to vote for reopening for some reason.  I doubt this is intentional, perhaps not as important, but still.
56844
A  appears to have been deleted, and deletion is attributed to a moderator,  deleted by Sathyajith Bhat♦ 12 hours ago , however,  (however, they did previously (unsuccessfully) tried migrating it to another site in the network where they're also a moderator, but migration was rejected by another moderator, it was then on hold on webapps, and then the hold was removed, which was supposed to have been the end of it).  Can someone explain what's going on here?  And restore the question that clearly wasn't meant to have been deleted, was a HNQ, and has 75 votes on the question, plus 74 votes on the top answer, and 56 on second answer; and 19 on third?  There's a lot of links to this question, too, and now they're all broken, making SE look like a community hostile to a popular question ontopic for the site it was on.
40549
Post Reopened by Tim Post ♦, waiwai933   On , right above Rev. 3.  How did that happen? How did a normal user vote to reopen after Tim cast a binding reopen vote?  Note that this happened 22 hours ago as of the time of this post, and Tim was and is a member of the community team with full moderator privileges.
54363
I was peacefully reading the Gaming.SE blog, when suddenly, GASP I . I diligently look for a way to get rid of it... but found none. , so I'm doing a feature request. Ah, also, if someone is kind enough to remove that spam, thanks! D:
2608
Since asking for tutorials, videos, resources, links to other content or downloads is considered off topic here, this is a specifically created Community Wiki which gathers resources for Blender and it has been approved by the .  Just write in the appropriate answer/section. If you have concerns, questions, post a  question, so we don't clutter the comments, but you can link your meta question from the comments.  Questions regarding such resources are not allowed anymore, except for very specific and on topic requests (ask on  if you're unsure about your question). Follow the instructions made in the question about how to post, what can be posted, etc.  Learning             Assets    (also see: )   Reference Images/Blueprints (also see: )    Tools    (also see: )      Other   Special Interest ()     Also see the .
48138
Meanwhile, in August 2009  as reason for comment flagging, and the comment flags show in the 10k tools. And  is on its way. Hence: I don't care for this request myself anymore. An explicit [status-declined] would be fine.    What about being able to set comments to auto-expire? Or, alternatively, set a comment to be removable by the author of the question or answer one comments on?  This way the communities would allow for some personal or funny comments (even like "Thanks") without those comments littering the sites forever. Or, when the original author is allowed to clean up, then comments that have been taken care of by editing the question or answer, could be removed.  Why?  As, , there's no way to send a personal message to other members, I find myself abusing the comments like some "poor man's private messaging system". I try to refrain from things like "Thank you", but sometimes I do want to point out something to someone. After a while (hours, days) I then  to remove them (hoping that no-one actually replied to them with another comment, like "Thanks, fixed it").  Like :    (I don't find this feature request very important (at all), I am quite impressed by what's been given us already, and I doubt there's a way to implement it without making things too confusing. Maybe I'm just trying too hard to keep things tidy and clean. Still, I wanted to share it, just in case someone comes up with something very clever...)
13542
On the  blog post, nearly all the images are broken. I assume this is because they are all hosted on stackoverflow.blog/wp-content/uploads/ rather than zgab33vy595fw5zq-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/, and they got destroyed in the removal of Blog Overflow. I looked around at a few other blog posts, and this post seems to be the only one having an issue.
70946
Today I saw "", realized it was a duplicate and voted to close it.  I then saw in the comments that I had voted to close it four days ago!  How did that happen? There were no close votes listed at all, and I was permitted to vote to close it today!
52960
I'm searching for a music video that has a scene exactly the same as the  film, with the boy and the monster.   It's not a song from the soundtrack!  It's just an underrated song with an awesome video.
41136
Should I edit out the (thankfully obsfucated) e-mail address from this ?  Is this something we should allow on the site going forward?  I don't care about the "thank you" or "hello", but this might lead to an answer being sent by e-mail, which would mean it wouldn't be peer reviewed (for what that's worth), and the answer would be lost to the community.
56465
If I find a video on YouTube that I want to send to a friend, but I really only care about something at the two minute mark, can I send him a link that will start at two minutes into the video for him?  Is there a specific URL or setting when sending a link to a YouTube video that jumps directly to a point in the timeline?
9567
I have seen this question now many times and every question here and on other forum points to  experimental tutorial by . Now sadly a lot of answers are invalid right now because this central link is down. I couldn't find anything by Googling so if anybody has a fork of the tutorial or a second source that would be great? The link can't be gone for too long, I saw an answer with it 4 months ago.  The only other thing I have found is , but it also references the now missing tutorial. Any ideas how to find it?
47035
I found  (only visible to 10k+ users on SFF, sorry) which had been deleted from review some hours ago but also flagged for conversion to a comment. I undeleted it and converted it to a comment (which of course re-deletes the answer), only to see that the post claimed to have been "deleted from review just now" by the same list of users as before.  Here's a screenshot of the timeline:    And here's one of what the post itself looks like now:    It was actually deleted from review 3 hours ago and then undeleted and redeleted by me 36 minutes ago, but to a casual observer it looks like it was deleted from review 36 minutes ago.  I'm posting this as a  report because it's technically showing incorrect information, but I'd be perfectly happy to be told it's actually a new feature. In fact, I've often found it annoying that when a whole bunch of users have voted to delete a post and then I convert it to a comment, their votes don't show up and it looks like I've acted unilaterally to remove it. This kind of remedies that.
16332
Like always I hang around in Stack Overflow's chatrooms. Today, someone posted a link to his new "reloaded" user profile.  Along the lines I read in Arabic "god is a pig". So I asked him to remove it:     Me: I have a lot of respect towards you because of your knowledge but what you wrote there in Arabic is offensive. Could you remove it please?   OP: if it were in English, would it be equally offensive?   I will write it in Dutch because you ask it so kindly.   Me: yeah, I mean what's your goal? You're just seeding hatred   OP: It is an experiment.   After that, the user changed it to Dutch.  My question is: are such statements acceptable by Stack Exchange's standards? If not, should I flag one of his posts like stated ? If yes, could you state why?  My answers to possible questions:   This happened on SO, why don't you post it on MSO?   This happened on SO but I think it's applicable to all SE sites.  Why didn't you link the user or the chat conversation?   I want the user to remain anonymous unless he or she chooses to reveal him/her self. I will give the user a link to this question  Why do you care?   I find it offensive, not only to my religion but to any religion that believes in god. I posted this question to know what you guys and girls think about this. I live by the rules, so if it's acceptable by SE then so be it and I won't bother you again.  If you don't like it then move on.   I know that this is not a mosque/church/temple and that swearing  to a certain degree. But I don't see the point in insulting god, a religion or a race in a public profile. More over, it's not even built on arguments.
91588
How do I download a YouTube video?    I have used various solutions in the past that do not seem to work any longer ( and various  scripts). Is this just no longer possible?
7283
Recently, Sara Chipps posted her message . After reading it, I wanted to compare it with . It turns out that she deleted it. Does anyone know why? It looks strange since (as far as remember) it was a sort of official position of SE. Why would such a statement be deleted?