Here's a view of the . The tag wiki is displayed with questions with that tag:     and the tag wiki becomes borked:    It seems like words in the tag wiki that matches the tag have HTML tags associated with it.  doesn't show these HTML tags.    :    What's wrong? Can it be fixed?
26238
When you search on any of the SE network sites, with a tag (so that a description is shown); it shows the tag info content box, with the highlight-search-term span elements.  For eg. I searched ; ; and the results are as shown:                  Notice the &lt;span class='search-highlight'&gt; boxes around searched tag terms.
35104
Top [tag]s doesn't show anything for some users  This is true on several users pages on [dba.se] but the reason for it to show on some pages and not others is unclear. Thoughts?
58944
What do I need to do to rename a tag?  I see some people post a question here and ask for a tag to be renamed. Is there some other way?
111818
When writing an question here on meta I noticed the  tries to get away at the left side of the Tags box.    This only happens on IE11 (Win7/x64). I couldn't repro on Chrome or Firefox.  I and others have seen similar issues, , ,  and , across browsers.  If there is time, can this be fixed for those poor IE11 users?
36978
With the tag page changed, there are some.. let's call them "controversial" opinions whether it's an improvement or not; I'd rather not comment on that, but point out a certain "feature" in the tag excerpts wikis which are shown on the \tags page:  Case in point from the TeX-SE tags page:      The  tag wiki excerpt reads:     TeX and friends give you the resources to put text in the header and footer of your document. This tag is for questions relating to this.   Huh?   I thought it was just someone was being lazy not providing a proper tag description. But it turned out that this happens on a lot more tags, to a different degree. The layout script, or whatever it is, tries to be clever, and removes some stuff in front of the tag excerpts to avoid repetition, presumably.   The cases I noticed so far:   "Questions tagged with [foo]" "This tag is about" "Choose this tag if your question is" "Use the [foo] tag for" "[foo] is" "This tag"   .. and probably more, I'm too lazy to search.   The point is -- the script tries to be clever and removes whole sentences, leaving weird and incomplete description, which is what tag wikis are all about.   Now, the questions:   Is this  or a bug? How exactly does it work? What template for tag excerpts should we use to avoid ridiculous entries like the one shown?
77345
In the formatted preview for Questions &amp; Answers, typing a tag link with an invalid tag name "crashes" the preview. As soon as you type the following the preview stops updating and an error can be observed in the Javascript console.   [tag:+]   Observed in Safari 7 and Chrome 31.   seems related to the business rule of not allowing certain characters in tags, but it sounds like a different bug.
13855
I've been editing some wiki entries on the new Expatriates site, and started to get the following error:    When I go to a normal post, I see what is presumably the proper explanation:    Can the Wiki Tag edit error be updated to show a more meaningful error message?
71683
Just found one question on SO with the tag . Got intrigued and went after explanation. Found empty wiki but used in 458 questions. Edit: 241 179 150 61 50 now.  0 to go!  Some tagged it because of , others relating to , others , etc  I feel this is a confusing and not helpful tag. Can someone clarify it so we can add a wiki to it, or should this tag be burninated?
104276
Can I find out which tags I have created? This would be interesting to know.  The tags could be highlighted on the users page for example.
81240
It seems most of the questions tagged  on Stack Overflow are just intended to indicate "there's something wrong with my program", which would cover probably at least 80% of all questions on Stack Overflow.  There are some questions where it seems to refer to a possible bug in a framework or utility. I'm not sure the tag is really all that useful in that case either.  What does meta think?
9348
During the re-tagging of questions, tags sometimes become orphaned from existing questions.  Are these zombie tags ever removed from the ?  What if a tag is misspelled and needs to be removed? How do we get rid of it?
7217
I don't see any case where the  tag could be useful (or  for that matter).  are always tagged with a programming language, which is much more pertinent.  Should it be Burninated?
9219
I was reading through some badge descriptions and noticed that Synonymizer's description needs to be updated. As it stands, there is raw HTML (an href) in the description:    EDIT: after reading comments by @ColeJohnson, I have come to the understanding that this post comes off as whiny. I want to make it very clear that I wasn't ever trying to complain. My first reaction was to fix the perceived error myself. When I realized I was unable to do so, I figured the best course of action would be to find someone who would be able to make the necessary edits. Hence the post here.
18123
Recently, I was surfing on stackoverflow.com &amp; I have found one bug in Question filter.  I was looking under the java tag and yet I saw questions which were not tagged java    The incorrectly shown question was
95800
Prompted by , where a user (who happens to have edit permissions on the tag wiki) posted an FAQ as a question in hopes that people would use it to redirect common questions.  Is this an acceptable question for Stack Overflow? Or would it be more helpful if this were in the tag wiki, and we could mark questions as duplicates of the tag wiki?   Thoughts?
50298
I have just created a  blog using the Fluid theme. After creating a new post, I added a few tags, but then I noticed that the tags do not show up along with the post.  I tried searching for an option to make the tags visible, but I could not find it. As it was pointed out, apparently not all themes display the tags.  How do I make the tags visible if using the Fluid theme? What changes do I have to make to its HTML?
79850
So today I noticed a question that had the  tag. As the question was not about JSFiddle, and only included a link to the site, I thought somebody has just created this for the sake of it. So I decided the best action would be to remove it, and try to stop it from getting out of control.  But then I searched (clicked the tag) for other questions that used it and I was amayonaised to see over 500 questions had the very same tag! Most of which were incorrectly tagged. So I cleaned up a couple and then quickly got bored.  So I am wondering, aside from going through them all by myself, is there a more efficient way?  I think it would be a great idea if there was some feature (probably an admin feature) that allowed a new tag queue to be added to the review list. I think this could work well as follows:   Somebody brings up the problematic tag in question (e.g. Me on here) An admin reviews my concern, and decides that the tag is very misused That admin adds the tag for review in a (temporary) new review queue. All users that can review can then go through existing tags, and vote for "No action" or "Remove tag" The world becomes a slightly better place   ...or not?    By the way, I tried to add some new tags to this post but I don't have the rep. So if someone could create them for me that would be swell: "musefan", "today", "sunny-spells", "pointless-tags"