The situation: as of now, I have 781 rep on  (a beta site). This grants me access to the First Posts, Late Answers, Close Votes, and Reopen Votes queues on main, as well as . On main, I have a link to "review" in the top bar. On meta, however, . If I go directly to , though, I can access the queues just fine.   This appears to be a bug of some sort - once I have access to at least one review queue on meta (which happens at 500 rep on beta sites), I should see the "review" link in the top bar.   Note that there seems to be some amount of rep between 781 and 6331 that causes the "review" link to appear on meta - I have 6331 rep on , and .
78378
I committed and joined  in private beta. As per private beta privilege page casting close and reopen votes requires only 1 reputation. So anyone is able to access close votes and reopen votes review queues. But there is no link of the review page in the top bar or anywhere. So I thought I am not able to access any review queue. I opened the review page by typing the URL manually (to see review statistics for curiosity). But I found that I can access close &amp; reopen votes review queues.        Probably I won't be able to access any review queue if I have less than 350 and the site goes to public beta. But during private beta off topics, unclear, or closable questions are likely to come. So it is very important to close/reopen them during private beta.  So can we please add the "review" link in the top bar if I am able to review some queues?
58019
Very funny: on the stats page for 'suggested edits', it says there is 1 user with 1 review so far today. However, the counter for 'reviews today' says there are 11. Similar issues exist in other review queues of other Stack Exchange sites, e.g. for first posts. . Checkout these stats to see it at work.  I would not be surprised if the counter has not been reset last night at the start of a new day ... smells like a bug (or yet another undocumented feature ...).
40599
Can you give us some way to access pending Reviews for a post from the post itself?  I think this would also help improve the accuracy and quality of reviews done, as users that come across the post naturally are more likely to be better qualified to evaluate the post, and are already taking the time to understand the post's content anyways.  In most cases, these users will be able to provide better reviews than those who are  [often quickly] going through the Review Queues.  In addition, I think it would help get more reviews done, as someone viewing a post through normal site usage would be more likely to take an interest in helping maintain that post. I know I definitely would be more active with this instead of having to go through the massive Review Queue. The task of helping fix one question that I am currently reading is far more do-able than cleaning up a large queue of questions that is largely full of content I don't care about.  I'm thinking of something like a reviews(1) link that is accessible from the post itself that appears based on your rep, or perhaps even on your rep within the post's tags.
55921
Another meta question identified a bug that was marked as designed. To summarize the bug, the little number that appears next the Review link in the header shows an incorrect value most of the time.         I would like to propose that the feature be dropped. Honestly, I would prefer it be fixed, but the response to the question above gives me little faith that it will be. Half of the time, I click that little brown box and find out that I was lied to. There's nothing to review.  The little number no longer does the job it was created to do.        Oh sweet! Three things I can review!        Just kidding...
66260
I see a "review" link on the top of the page, which takes me to a few "review queues".   What is a "review queue"? What are the various queues for? What can I do in each queue?
117370
On the one hand, I see very few posts in the review queue when I visit.  On the other hand, I see a lot of pretty awful first posts sitting on the front page.  This leads me to suspect that robo-reviewers are blowing through the queue.  Given how empty the queue is, could you please increase the number of people who have to check in before a post leaves the queue?  Of course, some honey-pot solution to detect and disable the auto-clickers would be even better.
99458
I voted to close a question I thought was too localized, and four days later I see that my close vote has apparently been aged away.  The question only has &lt;100 views right now, so based on , I'm assuming the question was reviewed and people opted to leave it open which then kicked off the close vote aging process.  Is there way for me to see which moronsfellow users thought that the question deserved to stay open without tediously clicking through the close vote queue history?    @Dukeling brings up the important question of motivation for this feature that I didn't address.   First and foremost, I just want to be able to check that the vote-aging system is working correctly (and/or that I understand correctly how it's working). I was surprised that my vote had aged out on a little-viewed question, I want to confirm that this is due to it having been reviewed. Secondly I want to make sure the reviewers are working correctly.  The review queues have had occasional issues with reviewer accuracy. If the particular reviewers seem like reliable folks with a history of correct reviews, I'll assume that I was mistaken about the question and revise my thinking about which questions to close.  If they're all robo-reviewers, I'll flag the question or bring it up on meta to see that it's handled correctly. Finally, philosophically I think that this information should be readily available. I could find the reviews by going through the entire review history, so it's not private information. Making public information less accessible can have its uses, but the outcome that's likely to ruffle feathers is already public; if reviewers opt to close a question, their names are prominently attached to it.  This feature would be more important when the review decision is "Leave Open" as in this case (apparently).  This might lead to more whining, but it seems like only a slight risk.
4978
Update (March, 2012): This has been rolled out to all sites in the network.    Behind the scenes we've been hard at work making some changes to how we track reputation.  Here are some of the issues we're aiming to address with these changes:   Reputation Skew (your actual reputation doesn't match what's shown) Up/Down votes oddities (mostly with the daily rep cap, the magical +2) Historical Deletes (not impacting rep immediately, contributing to skew) Unaccepts (display issues in the profile) User Deletion (magically missing rep, another skew contributor)   To be clear: reputation values are not changing, every action in the system is still worth the same amount.   Here’s what will be different:   Your reputation will be correct at all times Deletions will have a much more immediate effect on reputation, not waiting on a recalc  (but reputation sync takes up to 5 minutes on a delete/undelete action; as to not block the user's response thread, it's offloaded to a background queue) Recalcs will no longer be necessary Up/Down vote reversals will restore the correct reputation amount Up/Down vote reversals will correctly adjust to the reputation cap The reputation history in your profile will be more detailed and accurate (e.g. when a post is deleted, you'll see that in the reputation tab of your profile)   This means your reputation will go up and down more than it has previously, but it will be in sync.  To think of it more easily: imagine that a recalc will be done after every action in the system.  Probably the biggest impact many will be concerned with is that you may see your reputation drop in cases where it didn't seem like it did before  This was effectively happening before, but the results of that change were not applied immediately, but on the next rep recalc.  Post deletion is the biggest factor here, previously it didn't (immediately) account for the reputation impact...that will no longer be the case.  Reputation changes from the deletion will now be applied within the hour, and most other changes will be instant.  Now the part that will make everyone throw vegetables our way:  this will require a global recalc to get everything in sync.  We'll be rolling it out first here on meta, then the rest of the network...the enabling of the detailed rep view and global recalc on each individual site will coincide.  During the rollout you will see empty reputation tabs on profiles as we transition to the new storage behind the scenes, they'll be restored as the recalc rolls though each user.  We’ll put up a blog post on  before the network-wide rollout.  If you have any questions about this change or details I may have left out, please do so in answers below so that we can clear up as much as possible before this rolls out.
115960
Today I was just checking my reputation summary on SO and it shows I have got 7 rep points today.    But when I go to my profile and see the reputation obtained for today, it shows only 5. Also realistically from yesterday my reputation has increased by 7, but I am unable to find from where I got the additional 2 reputation points. Is this a bug?  Just to add, I have not accepted any answers as such in last couple of days on SO.
55054
Seems like a stupid question, but I'm after a nice solid answer if possible.  I joined SO a while ago to ask the odd question, but recently I'm starting to use it more often.  I've been reviewing the 40 max items (20 first posts/20 late answers) per day, and editing anything I see wrong with them (lots of +2's)... flagging them... etc.  I've also been  per day.  But other than commenting where I can and answering the odd question, I'm only  (1k at the moment).  I might just be overeager, but I was hoping some high-rep users might be able to write a little something on how they earned their stripes?  I've , and to be honest I was hoping I'd get a hit, because it sounds like a stupid question... anyways, here you go!  Also, I'm not referring to how to gain rep on Meta, since it's a bit of a fluke I've earned the rep I have on here. I'm asking about main SO.
57247
Clicking the orange review counter used to take me right to suggested edits. As of sometime in the past couple days, it started showing the total number of waiting reviews (not just edits), and leading to /review.  When was this changed, and why? It's not on
116305
The close votes count has been bothering me for a while now. I want to make sure I fully understand how the system works and maybe update the FAQ so it's less confusing for people.  The  says we have 50 close votes each day.   I am 6K+ on SO.  I have used 40 votes in the Close Votes queue today but If I go into any question and click on close, it says that I have 12 votes left ( after using 8 close votes directly from question pages earlier today - not the queue )  Does that mean I actually have 60 votes? I am confused.  Is there anywhere to find the rep lvl vs. the amount of close votes allowed per question and review queue?  Something like  1K+ = 20 votes on questions 2K+ = 30 votes on questions 3K+ = 35 votes on questions / 40 in the review queue 4K+ = 40 votes on questions / 50 in the review queue
8917
Not sure if it is a bug or not, but it feels like a bug to me. When I got to 200 rep on SO the other day I got +100 rep to all my accounts including SO. So my rep jumped up to 300 on SO.  Considering there are others on SO with rep between 200 and 300 I think it is possible that the +100 was supposed to apply only to the linked accounts, not to the account with 200+.
79315
Suggested edits are disabled on per-site metas, which means that only users with full edit privileges (>2k rep on graduated sites or >1000 rep on public betas) can edit posts on a site meta. This has been declared  by Jeff Atwood a while ago, .  But as already mentioned in comments there, the ideal solution would be to just add the suggested edits on the meta to the queue on the main site. That way there would be no additional queue, and the meta sites would be editable by anyone like all the main sites.  The whole SE network trains its users to expect being able to edit any post, disabling that functionality silently on the meta sites breaks the user expectations and only leads to confusion. It also drastically reduces the number of users able to edit on site metas for many sites.  I don't know if there are any technical aspects that make this solution difficult to implement, but from an external perspective just adding the suggested edits to the main queue seems like a good solution to this problem.
47942
With reference to the question , when reviewing in SO, we have to refresh the page every now and then to view the newly added entries to the review queue.  However, votes and reputation are updated on the display as soon as a vote is cast, and as soon as reputation changes. Is it possible to integrate this kind of feature to see the number of pending entries in the review queues page.  This request is probably not a duplicate of , where the feature is requested for a counter in front of the title of the page. But, my question adresses the .
38678
Today, on C.SE, I reviewed some 'Late Answers' and First Posts.  I was not even near my daily vote limit.  And yet, I was given a message that said      comments disabled on deleted / locked posts / reviews   It seems I was not the only one either:   The workaround, of course, was simply to go back and provide the guidance - but was this a design or a bug?  If it is design, why would you want to discourage the feedback? Especially with first posts, there is often a high percentage of 'didn't read the FAQ' usage, which can best be addressed by gently providing guidance. (e.g. "Unfortunately, this doesn't answer the question" or "This reads like a comment" or "This really isn't on-topic here - can I suggest you checkout our [faq]" etc...)  Timely first post guidance goes a long way towards making good users.   If it was a bug, was other functionality silently rolled out?
66201
I know once you get a certain amount of reputation, you can see the total up and down votes for questions. Well, my proposal is to always be able to see this on your own questions and answers. You can see it by going to your user page anyway, so why not make it possible to do by simply clicking on the number of votes (like you can when you have the rep)?