The  package provides macros for transformation signs, eg: \fourier and \laplace.    I need a vertical version of those symbols.
1659
I know what my symbol or character looks like, but I don't know what the command is or which math alphabet it came from. How do I go about finding this out?
100626
For example {a..c}{1..3} expands to a1 a2 a3 b1 b2 b3 c1 c2 c3.   If I wanted to print a1 b1 c1 a2 b2 c2 a3 b3 c3, is there an analogous way to do that? What's the simplest way?
15327
The title is pretty much I want to ask. More detail, the nomenclature entries should be sorted in groups like:   Nomenclature     Acronyms     Symbol  Description     % no Dimensions and Units      ...     Greek Symbols     Symbol  Description             Dimensions     Units     ...     Roman Symbols     Symbol  Description             Dimensions     Units     S       Surface area vector     L^2            m^2     ...    Superscripts     Symbol  Description     % no Dimensions and Units      ...    Dimensionless Numbers     Symbol  Description     Definition     ...   e.g. expected entries like this:       My current nomenclature settings for grouping [book class]:  %---------------------------------------------------------- %                        Nomenclature %---------------------------------------------------------- %\renewcommand{\nomname}{List of Symbols and Abbrev.} \renewcommand\nomgroup[1]{%   \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{A}}{%    \item[\textbf{Acronyms}] }{%                  A - Acronyms     \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{R}}{%      \item[\textbf{Roman Symbols}]}{%            R - Roman       \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{G}}{%         \item[\textbf{•} Symbols }]}{%          G - Greek           \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{S}}{%            \item[\textbf{Superscripts  }]}{{%          S - Superscripts         \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{U}}{%          \item[\textbf{Subscripts }]}{{%                 U - Subscripts         \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{X}}{%          \item[\textbf{Other Symbols }]}%            X - Other Symbols                     {{}}}}}}}}}} %\ifpdf \renewcommand{\nomlabel}[1]{\hspace{1 em}#1}%{\hspace{1.5 em}#1} \renewcommand*{\nompreamble}{\markboth{\nomname}{\nomname}}   But how to extend it with Dimensions and Units?
44469
Does anybody know how to make the following symbol in LaTeX? I think it is some calligraphic \mathcal{E}.     It is not anywhere in  and online font recognizers do not recognize it.   The general font in the book I got this symbol from, Introduction to Quantum Optics by Grynberg, is not very extraordinary: this is a formula containing the strange symbol:
22734
I've come across this in a book I'm looking through, but I can't find the code for it. I want it to look exactly like the \widehat and go above text like \widehat does...I just want it to be (vertically) flipped!
62751
Title says it all (I think). I'm betting it's something to do with Standard Integrals though. What is this symbol "$\int$" called?
73472
I have some code which uses the \oiint symbol. However there are many packages that provide this command. Most of for special fonts. I am using lmodern however and want a package that provides the symbol matching to lmodern.  I have found so far wasysym with option [integrals], mathabx and esint package.
9726
This question led to a new package:      Does anybody have a quick and easy way to typeset some relatively long MATLAB code in the appendix? I looked up a few methods, and the mcode package emerged as a possibility, but it seems to be unmaintained...  I have a ton of equations in my code, so I'd prefer a solution that avoids having to use $ to denote equations.  Also, if possible, if there's a way to keep all of MATLAB's "natural" coding colors (e.g. green for comments), that would be great...  Any idea?
83071
This is a follow-up to .  Suppose you want to denote vectors by upright bold letters; then \mathbf{u} works fine, except that if it's a Greek letter you have to use \boldsymbol{\omega} instead.  Question: Is it possible to define a generic vector command in LaTeX which automatically chooses between \mathbf and \boldsymbol, so that one can write just \vect{u} and \vect{\omega} without having to treat the Greek symbols specially by hand?  (Just to be clear: \newcommand{\vect}[1]{\boldsymbol{#1}} is no good in this situation, since \boldsymbol{u} gives bold italic instead of roman.)
82713
I wish to use the symbol as in the following picture, however, I can not find it. Can someone help me?
25118
I would like to create a norm-like operator with 3 verticals bars instead of two. It has to look like $|||\cdot|||$. I would like to know how to decrease the spacing between the vertical bars such that it has the same spacing as the $\lVert .. \rVert$ command.  There is a command available in the stmaryrd package called \biginterleave, but this command has to much spacing between the vertical bars, especially in display math mode.  Is there some work-around to adjust the spacing between to vertical bars?
97899
Suppose I have a map A → B which is an isomorphism. I'd like to represent this as something that looks like \rightarrow with \simunder it. I could try \underset{}_{}, but is there already a ready made symbol?  I couldn't find the symbol using Detexify, nor in the comprehensive list of LaTeX symbols.
20492
Mathematical operators, such as function names, should be set in roman type, not italics. Latex already has commands for some operators, including \max, \min, and \log.  How can I define additional such commands?
80182
Given an arbitrary thin vertical symbol, can I create a new math delimiter from it (and if so, how)?   Edit: Ideally, I would like to be able to create an extensible symbol, either built out an existing normal symbol, or even made from scratch.  Edit 2: I am pretty sure that what I am after is an explanation of how to create a .tfm file for an extensible symbol (which Werner's answer describes the general structure of, but not how to make one).    For example, let's say I wanted to use the \dagger () or \wr () symbol as a delimiter, and write expressions like    \[\left\ldagger \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n \right\rdagger\]   where the symbol scaled appropriately. Would there be any distinction between declaring a symmetric delimiter (like \vert), as opposed to one that has inherently different "left" and "right" versions like [ and ]?  Now, even being unaware of the inner workings of TeX, I imagine that there has to be lots of information in the fonts for how a delimiter is to be scaled in different situations, and if I try to make my own delimiter, this information won't be present. Would I need to get deep into FontForge or equivalent to achieve my custom delimiters, or is there an easier way?
33487
I'm trying to find the equivalent to \d (or \textsubdot) for the math mode.
52629
Is there any way I can specify a standard or custom numeric format string to always output the sign, be it +ve or -ve (although what it should do for zero, I'm not sure!)
11048
I'm confused about the use of symbols $\vdash$ and  $ \models$. Reading the answers to  and  I see that:  the turnstile symbol $ \vdash $ denotes syntactic implication. Then $ S \vdash \psi$ means that $\psi$ can be derived from the formulae in $S$  the double turnstile $ \models $, denotes semantic implication. Then the notation $A \models B$ means simply that B is true in every model in which A is true.  So I understand that, e.g., $(ZFC+ A) \vdash B$ means that $A \Rightarrow B$ is a theorem in ZFC and, in this sense $\vdash$ is a mathematical symbol for a theorem. While $(ZFC+ A) \models B$ means that $ B$ is true in every model of ZFC in which $A$ is true, and, in this sense $\models$ is not a mathematical but a metamathematical symbol.  I understand correctly? And those are the only uses of the two symbols?