I have written a piece of code that counts the number of lines in a file (I wasn't able to find a built-in method that could acheive this in the IO classes). My code below:  try {     while(!line.equals("null")) {         line = bufferedReader.readLine();         a = a + 1;         System.out.println(a + " " + line);     } } catch (NullPointerException N) {}   The problem I'm running into is that the count still increases while the variable 'line' evaluates to "null". I understand why this is the case; the while statement won't check the condition until after the entire code block has been run, in which case 'a' will have increased once again. Solutions I have considered:  1) Set 'a = -1', whereas I currently have 'a = 0' before this block of code 2) Use if statement to break the loop before the count variable is reached. This is how I would modify the code block:  try {     while(!line.equals("null")) {         line = bufferedReader.readLine();         if (line.equals("null")) {break;}         a = a + 1;         System.out.println(a + " " + line);     } } catch (NullPointerException N) {}   My problem with the above? (1) seems too contrived while (2) seems redundant. I wanted to see if there's a better way to approach this - thanks for your suggestions.
19889
I use huge data files, sometimes I only need to know the number of lines in these files, usually I open them up and read them line by line until I reach the end of the file  I was wondering if there is a smarter way to do that
9792
Yesterday I had a two-hour technical phone interview (which I passed, woohoo!), but I completely muffed up the following question regarding dynamic binding in Java.  And it's doubly puzzling because I used to teach this concept to undergraduates when I was a TA a few years ago, so the prospect that I gave them misinformation is a little disturbing...  Here's the problem I was given:  /* What is the output of the following program? */  public class Test {    public boolean equals( Test other ) {     System.out.println( "Inside of Test.equals" );     return false;   }    public static void main( String [] args ) {     Object t1 = new Test();     Object t2 = new Test();     Test t3 = new Test();     Object o1 = new Object();      int count = 0;     System.out.println( count++ );// prints 0     t1.equals( t2 ) ;     System.out.println( count++ );// prints 1     t1.equals( t3 );     System.out.println( count++ );// prints 2     t3.equals( o1 );     System.out.println( count++ );// prints 3     t3.equals(t3);     System.out.println( count++ );// prints 4     t3.equals(t2);   } }   I asserted that the output should have been two separate print statements from within the overridden equals() method: at t1.equals(t3) and t3.equals(t3).  The latter case is obvious enough, and with the former case, even though t1 has a reference of type Object, it is instantiated as type Test, so dynamic binding should call the overridden form of the method.  Apparently not.  My interviewer encouraged me to run the program myself, and lo and behold, there was only a single output from the overridden method: at the line t3.equals(t3).  My question then is, why?  As I mentioned already, even though t1 is a reference of type Object (so static binding would invoke Object's equals() method), dynamic binding should take care of invoking the most specific version of the method based on the instantiated type of the reference.  What am I missing?
92088
public class WrapperTest {      public static void main(String[] args) {          Integer i = 100;         Integer j = 100;          if(i == j)             System.out.println("same");         else             System.out.println("not same");     }     }   The above code gives the output of same when run, however if we change the value of i and j to 1000 the output changes to not same. As I'm preparing for SCJP, need to get the concept behind this clear. Can someone explain this behavior.Thanks.
90464
We noticed that lots of bugs in our software developed in C# (or Java) cause a NullReferenceException.  Is there a reason why "null" has even been included in the language?  After all, if there were no "null", I would have no bug, right?  In other words, what feature in the language couldn't work without null?
81621
If I write the following class:  public class Example {        int j;       int k;        public Example(int j, int k) {            j = j;            k = k;       }        public static void main(String[] args) {            Example exm = new Example(1,2);            System.out.println(exm.j);            System.out.println(exm.k);       }  }   The program compiles, but when I run the program, the main method will print out two 0s. I know that in order to say that I want to initialize the instance variables in the constructor I have to write:  this.j = j; this.k = k;   But if I don't write it, then which variable is evaluated (or considered) in the constructor (on the left and on the write hand side of the expressions)? Is is the argument or the instance variable? Does it make a difference?  Are there other cases where the use of this is obligatory?
75825
I have created a program which searches for files in a source folder. If it finds any file, it processes that file and moves it to a destination folder, then looks for a new file in the source folder. It has to keep on checking the source folder for a file.  I have used a thread to look for files in the source folder. The problem I am facing is whenever any exception is thrown during file processing, the thread gets stopped. I want the thread to be running even if an exception is thrown. It has to move the file that caused the error to some other folder and look for a new file in the source folder. How can I make the thread keep on running?  Eg:  public void run() {     try {         searchfile();     }     catch(Exception e) {         e.printStackTrace();     } }  public void searchfile(){   ... }     Update :   I should be more clear in my question. Actually there are 4 source folders and 4 destination folders. I have to perform the same operation in each source &amp; destination pair. So i have created 4 threads in one class and do the operation in separate class.  class MainClass {    public static void main(String[] args){       for(int i=0;i&lt;4;i++){          SearchClass search = new SearchClass();          Thread thread = new Thread(search);          thread.start();      }    }    }  class SearchClass {    public void run() {    try {       searchfile();    } catch(Exception e) {       e.printStackTrace();    } }  public void searchfile(){ ... } }   All the thread wont stop running eventhough it caught any exception in middle. How can i do that?
37105
I am using java language,I have a method that is supposed to return an object if it is found. If it is not found, should I:  return null throw an exception other  Which is the best practise or idiom?
107801
I posted the code below to the Sun developers forum since I thought it was erroring (the true error was before this code was even hit).  One of the responses I got said it would not work and to throw it away.  But it is actually working.  It might not be the best code (I am new to Java) but is there something inherently "wrong" with it?   =============  CODE:   private static void ImportFromCsvToAccessTable(String mdbFilePath, String accessTableName  , String csvDirPath , String csvFileName ) throws ClassNotFoundException, SQLException {      Connection msConn = getDestinationConnection(mdbFilePath);     try{          String strSQL = "SELECT * INTO " + accessTableName + " FROM [Text;HDR=YES;DATABASE=" + csvDirPath + ";].[" + csvFileName + "]";         PreparedStatement selectPrepSt = msConn.prepareStatement(strSQL );         boolean result = selectPrepSt.execute();                 System.out.println( "result = " + result );      } catch(Exception e) {         System.out.println(e);     } finally {         msConn.close();     } }
62317
In the early days of C++ when it was bolted on top of C, you could not use NULL as it was defined as (void*)0. You could not assign NULL to any pointer other than void*, which made it kind of useless. Back in those days, it was accepted that you used 0 (zero) for null pointers.  To this day, I have continued to use zero as a null pointer but those around me insist on using NULL. I personally do not see any benefit to giving a name (NULL) to an existing value - and since I also like to test pointers as truth values:  if (p &amp;&amp; !q)   do_something();   then using zero makes more sense (as in if you use NULL, you cannot logically use p &amp;&amp; !q - you need to explicitly compare against NULL, unless you assume NULL is zero, in which case why use NULL).  Is there any objective reason to prefer zero over NULL (or vice versa), or is all just personal preference?  Edit: I should add (and meant to originally say) that with RAII and exceptions, I rarely use zero/NULL pointers, but sometimes you do need them still.
40162
Please demonstrate how the ternary operator works with a regular if/else block. Example:  Boolean isValueBig = value &gt; 100 ? true : false;     Exact Duplicate:
56415
I have four foreach loops that iterate through the collections and based on a condition do something.   Here is the code that I am writing now:  boolean breakFlag = false; String valueFromObj2 = null; String valueFromObj4 = null; for(Object1 object1: objects){   for(Object2 object2: object1){     // I get some value from object2     valueFromObj2 = object2.getSomeValue();     for(Object3 object3 : object2){       for(Object4 object4: object3){        // Finally I get some value from Object4.        valueFromObj4 = object4.getSomeValue();        // Compare with valueFromObj2 to decide either to break all the foreach loop        breakFlag = compareTwoVariable(valueFromObj2, valueFromObj4 );        if(breakFlag){break;}       } // fourth loop ends here       if(breakFlag){break;}     } // third loop ends here     if(breakFlag){break;}   } // second loop ends here   if(breakFlag){break;} } // first loop ends here   The main object (objects in the code) comes from a third-party provider SDK, so I cannot change anything on that portion. I want to ask the Stack&nbsp;Overflow community if there is a better approach to break all the four foreach loops. Or if there is any other way to refactor this code to make it more readable and maintainable.
105631
Please consider the below scenario:   I have an Application__c object. I have a trigger on that (for simplicity, coded directly in trigger) which does one thing if the record name is Error then throws exception.     trigger ApplicationTrigger on Application__c (before insert, after update){          if(trigger.new[0].Name == 'Error'){             Application__c application;             System.debug(application.Name);         } }    Now I am running below code:     Now notice the catch statement is not executing, means system was not able to catch the exception. It came as the Fatal Error.   This is kind of a big issue where if there is null pointer or any other exception in trigger and exception handling code will not be able to do anything. Not even logging since it never reaches to catch block.   Let me know if you guys ever faced such situation and if yes what you did to make sure that it is properly caught.
21175
Is there a way to determine if the loop is iterating for the last time. My code looks something like this:  int[] array = {1, 2, 3...}; StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();  for(int i : array) {     builder.append("" + i);     if(!lastiteration)         builder.append(","); }   Now the thing is I don't want to append the comma in the last iteration. Now is there a way to determine if it is the last iteration or am I stuck with the for loop or using an external counter to keep track.
52524
So I was making a class the other day and used Eclipse's method to create the equals method when I realized that it generated the following working code:  class Test {   private int privateInt;   [...]   public boolean equals(Object obj) {     [...]     Test t = (Test) obj;     if ( t.privateInt == privateInt ) {     [...]   } }   t.privateInt..???? It's suppose to be private! So I guess there is one more field visibility other than private, protected, package protected and public.  So what is happening here? How is this called? Where would somebody use this? Doesn't this break encapsulation? What if the class didn't have a mutator and I changed this? Does this happen to C++ as well? Is this an OO idiom? If not, then why did Java do it?  Generally, where can I find information about this?  Thank you.
11442
I have an application that writes information to file. This information is used post-execution to determine pass/failure/correctness of the application. I'd like to be able to read the file as it is being written so that I can do these pass/failure/correctness checks in real time.  I assume it is possible to do this, but what are the gotcha's involved when using Java? If the reading catches up to the writing, will it just wait for more writes up until the file is closed, or will the read throw an exception at this point? If the latter, what do I do then?   My intuition is currently pushing me towards BufferedStreams. Is this the way to go?
23909
Looking for reviewers to suggest optimization and improvements, and to evaluate coding practices.  final class Variables {     private final int x;     private final int y;      Variables(int x2, int y2) {         this.x = x2;         this.y = y2;     }      public int getX() {         return x;     }      public int getY() {         return y;     }      @Override public String toString()  {          return "x = " + x + " y = " + y;     } }  public final class FindMissing {      private FindMissing() {};      /**  * Takes an input a sorted array with two variables that repeat in the  * range. Remaining variable are consecutive. and returns two variables that repeats  *   * eg: for a range of 1,2,3,4, a valid input is [1, 4], [1, 3] etc.  *   * @param a : the sorted array.  */ /*  * Why is start needed ?  * If start is not given then if a1 is empty how do we know if missing numbers were  * [1, 2] or [4, 5] ??.   */ public static Variables sortedConsecutiveTwoMissing (int[] a, int startOfRange) {     if (a == null) throw new NullPointerException("a1 cannot be null. ");      int low = startOfRange;     // calculating the highest value of the range. it needs to be 2 more than length since all elememts are consecutive.     int high = startOfRange + (a.length - 1) + 2;      int i = 0;     boolean foundX = false;     int x = 0;       while (i &lt; a.length) {         if (a[i] != low) {             if (foundX) {                 return new Variables(x, low);             } else {                 x = low;                 foundX = true;             }         } else {             i++;         }         low++;     }      return new Variables(x, high);  }  public static void main(String[] args) {         // unsortedConsecutiveTwoMissing         int[] a6 = {1, 4};         System.out.println("Expected 2 and 3, Actual " + sortedConsecutiveTwoMissing(a6, 1));         // unsortedConsecutiveTwoMissing         int[] a7 = {-4, -1};         System.out.println("Expected -3 and -2, Actual " + sortedConsecutiveTwoMissing(a7, -4));         int[] a8 = {-4, -3, -2, -1};         System.out.println("Expected 0 and 1, Actual " + sortedConsecutiveTwoMissing(a8, -4));         int[] a9 = {5};         System.out.println("Expected 4 and 6, Actual " + sortedConsecutiveTwoMissing(a9, 4));         }      }
41167
I am told that good developers can spot/utilize the difference between Null and False and 0 and all the other good "nothing" entities. What is the difference, specifically in PHP?  Does it have something to do with ===?