Is there a way to get a RSS feed for flags and the review queue? If not, this is a feature request.
121502
This came up in the mod chat earlier today. Would it be possible to add RSS feed support for the /review page?    This makes zero sense now that /review has been completely redone, and the jury's out on whether or not this ever made sense. So I get to status-decline my own request. :)
23382
Earlier today I flagged this  using the following flag option:     Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead,  and what has been done so far to solve it.   If you look at the edit history, shown below, I interpreted the original post's title and body to mean that they were asking for another utility, like SlowCheetah, which is why I flagged it with the rule I stated above.  In addition, I try to do my best to also inform the user that their post does not meet the standards of the site by leaving a comment as you can see on the post.  The poster acknowledged the feedback and updated their question, rendering my flag now invalid.    Ultimately, my flag was declined, which harms me because as we all know declined flags work against a SO user's total flag count:  Reference:      How many flags do I have?      When you start out, you are allotted 10 flags per day. This number may increase to up to 100 flags per day:      You get one bonus flag per 2000 reputation.      You are awarded additional bonus flags when you flag correctly - one bonus flag for every ten net helpful flags (helpful flags minus declined flags).   I only have 8 declined flags, and IIRC, 4 of those are because of situations just like this. So is it fair to negatively affect a member's total flag count, when the flag at the time of submission was accurate?  As such, I propose a new flag status like "Inapplicable', which when used does not affect total flag count, or something similar to this, so that situations like this do not negatively affect a user's flag count.   I understand I still have to have faith that a reviewer or moderator will see the post for what it was at the time the flag was submitted, but at least by adding this option, you provide reviewers and moderator's a means to take action in a fair manner.  I want to continue flagging questions and helping posters as much as I can, I just don't think it's fair to members that spend a lot of time flagging and helping members, to risk reducing their flag count just because of a shortfall of the system and because, let's be honest here, not all moderator's can act at the same level of objectivity, we all have differing viewpoints and interpretations.  I suppose this bothers me more than other issues I've come across on the site because I flag posts to help keep the site focused and free of poor posts and yet receive no reputation for these types of efforts.  The only positive thing you can reap are a few badges, &lt;sarcasm&gt;yay!&lt;/sarcasm&gt; or a negatively impacted flag count.  Just doesn't seem fair IMHO when my affects contribute to increasing the quality of posts which is just as important as contributing a quality answer IMO.  And to add, this isn't the first time this has happened to me and many other members of the site.  And yet, nothing has been done about it. Perhaps as a community we start spending a little bit more time little details like this to help keep people feeling positive about their efforts, especially those that aren't measured by reputation.  Thank you for your time,  Cheers.
92529
As it stands, the "First Posts" review queue is empty on Stack Overflow. As I seldom review that queue, it isn't empty because I have no posts to review; it's empty because, well it's empty.  However, in reviewing some of the 800 flags in the 10k Flag Queue, I came across so, so many posts by first users, which are blatantly low quality/ NAA, most of which had no comments at all, and those that did, I'm doubtful whether they were added during the review of the post in the "First Posts" queue (if it ever reached there).  Note that the guidance for the FP queue reads (emphasis mine):     Be sure to leave a comment if you can help the user out, upvote the question if you can't find any problems with it, or click Skip if you are not sure and want to go to the next item.   It seems a waste of everyone's time if all of the following posts had to cycle multiple reviews, be seen by 10k'ers in the 10k  queue, before been seen and finally handled by diamonds (and the whole while, the OP has no idea they've done anything wrong, due to the lack of feedback):                 ... and there's more, many more, but you get the gist.  How can the "First Post" queue be changed to better address this?   Should the addition of a comment be enforced if a "flag" was made? An extension of the above; a comment for anything other-than an up vote (yes, even a downvote)? Should the ability to "Delete" / "Recommend Deletion" exist like the LP queue Do we need more pairs of eyes per-post to ensure the correct action is (eventually?) taken? Would the current system work, except the robo-reviewers are making this queue so ineffective? ...?
39560
I'd love a scrollable widget that displayed the feed, possibly customising what was shown (i.e. hot questions, unanswered, rep changes, badge notifications etc.) globally or per-site.  Ideally each entry would be clickable in the widget, opening up the SE app to the relevant screen.
11448
The other day I was looking at Stack Overflow on my Android phone. All is made very nice and all, but I could not find the Review button/link. Is it being implemented, did I miss it, or it is not available?
52600
Suppose I want to have someone with moderator abilities review a post. What would be the best way to flag this?    Is there already some standard way to do this that I don't know about?     For more information, see "" in the .
60942
Is it just for me, or has the privilege to review new posts and late answers changed for everyone?  I recently started being more active in reviewing, but the rep requirement just shot up and I can not review anymore? The rep requirement has shot up to 500. Is this just for me, as a 'process", or has it been changed site wide?
2932
Let's say I see an answer that should not have been one and I flag it as Not An Answer (NAA). On this site I have plenty of reputation and am able to use the Low Quality (LQ) review queue and cast delete recommendation votes.  Of course raising such a flag on a still virgin post brings it to the LQ review queue, but what happens if I flag a post on the main site that is already in the respective review queue?  Is my flag simply useless in that case? I doubt it would be the same as casting a delete (recommendation) vote from the queue. And when I somehow manage to find that specific post in the review queue later, it's locked down for me, because I have already cast a flag. So was that flag without any effect?  Based on how I currently guess the system works, I proposed two alternative solutions to improve the system in my feature request . They were first part of this question, but I decided to split the question from the feature requests.
70170
On Stack Overflow, is there any way for users to view the actions that have been taken for the questions that they have flagged? I recently tried to move one of my own questions for stackoverflow to , but I still don't know whether my request was accepted or declined, or whether a response is still pending or not.
85868
When reviewing flags, either from the queue or from the flagged post, I often want to know what the flagger could have done in addition to, or instead of, flagging for mod attention.  Does he have the rep to downvote?  To comment?  To vote to delete?  Knowing this doesn't necessarily affect how I handle the flag, but if there's a possible teaching moment there I use the flag response to point it out.  But I can't find this out unless I click through to the user's profile (unless I already know this user, of course).  Would it be possible to get the flagger's reputation in a tooltip, like what's already done for comments?
47942
With reference to the question , when reviewing in SO, we have to refresh the page every now and then to view the newly added entries to the review queue.  However, votes and reputation are updated on the display as soon as a vote is cast, and as soon as reputation changes. Is it possible to integrate this kind of feature to see the number of pending entries in the review queues page.  This request is probably not a duplicate of , where the feature is requested for a counter in front of the title of the page. But, my question adresses the .
122583
So, I've been giving the mobile application a while for the last week or so, and I'm thrilled to be able to give feedback and report bugs on it.  I'm also thrilled that I can use the Stack Exchange network on my mobile, or tablet!  After about a week, though, I started to realize a few deficiencies in the application - some of which I've already reported as bugs, some of which are already reported, and some of which I'm not sure I should report, since I don't know what role this application is meant to serve.  So, I consider myself a bit of a power user of [Meta]StackOverflow.  I ask questions (at least on Meta), write answers, comment, but the bulk of my time spent on SO isn't geared towards that - it is, more times than not, flagging content, reviewing content, editing content, and otherwise consuming content.  The mobile application is certainly geared towards producing content and consuming content.  It does a fine job of that (although there are some rough cuts).  What I find myself doing, more often than not, though, isn't directly related to production or consumption of content - although I would agree that editing posts while on a 4 inch screen isn't ideal.  I'll compare my flow with the mobile version of the site.   On the mobile site, I can check my profile.   I can see my cumulative daily reputation score here. I can see my favorite questions here. I can see my most recent activity. I get credit for visiting the site.       In the app, I can check the feed.   I see new questions on sites that I'm definitely a member of, or that I've recently visited in the app. I'm not convinced I get credit for visiting the site on the mobile app.  Nor am I convinced that I should - although I want to.       On the mobile site, I can see what badges I've earned overall.   In the app, I can see what badges I've earned that day.       On the mobile site, I can order the results of questions with a lot of answers by votes.   On the app, that's not possible.    What I'm getting at is, despite it being an early alpha, it doesn't feel like it's going to have feature parity with the mobile desktop site.  So, is it meant to supersede the mobile desktop site?  Is it meant to be a CRUD application for SO?  Or does it fit somewhere in between?  I can provide better feedback and bug reports to the team if I have a clear understanding of what niche the app is trying to fill.
73893
When I clicked on recent questions feed on bottom of the site, I was navigated to the /feeds endpoint; where I can see the code.   I don't know if this a bug, or does the page always show such code?
84345
I usually review the  flagged posts list, which is the one with the most pending flags by the way (most of the time around 100 flags?). It is a great way to comfortably handle those posts and contribute to the site, but it has a couple of issues that keep me from using them as much as I'd like to:  I usually flag clearly-not-an-answer posts, and just skip the ones in tags I don't have enough knowledge about, or the ones I'm not sure about how to proceed with (I'm not certain enough to flag as invalid most of the flags). This means that when I request the next page of 50 flagged posts, I see many of the posts I just skipped.   The page shows 50 posts in random order. I understand this is intentional and aimed to avoid focusing handling of the flags on specific posts based on some ordering criteria. But when we're done scrolling through the 50 posts on the list, we can only get 50 more flagged posts (), and what is worse, having repeated posts all over.  This is disencouraging me from keeping reviewing flags once I've gone through the first page of the list.  Could the Showing 50 random posts;  link avoid showing posts already shown on the current post list?  Or could we have a "Skip" option (similar to the ones on the review queues) on the flagged posts in the list, just to indicate we're not sure about them and don't want them to appear again?
16779
The other day, I got an obviously good question in a Close Vote Review.  Even if I didn't read the question,  is a bit of a giveaway.  Today I got one where   Also, on sites other than SO (where I understand the queues are huge), the number of reviews needed is often low enough (single digits) that you usually notice when you get an extra one.  I don't mind - I'm quite happy to get easy-to-pass audits - but maybe they could be a little harder...
81467
The  would like to announce another release in a  for the Review queues. This release focuses on refreshing the queue user interface in preparation for further improvements to the user experience. Starting today, we will roll out these changes in three phases across the network. Roll-out plan We have planned for these UI changes to ship in three distinct phases affecting specific queues across the network. We will update this post as each phase is rolled out.      What Where When     Phase 1 • Home page (/review) • Close and reopen votes queue• Stats/History view• Steward badge Meta Stack ExchangeMeta Stack Overflow Shipped! January 28, 2021   Phase 2 • Changes from Phase 1• Suggested edits queue • Low quality posts queue • First posts queue • Late answers queue SuperUserAsk Ubuntu Shipped! February 16, 2021   Phase 3 • Changes from Phase 1 + 2• Triage queue (SO only)• Help and improvement queue (SO only) All network sites Shipped!February 23, 2021    UI changes to all queues  All review queues will be adopting a new user interface that focuses on providing reviewers with context to make deliberate, thoughtful decisions on review tasks. We shared an initial design proposal in our  and made sure to include that feedback into the final design. Responsive/Mobile-friendly design  We utilized  to update the visual design in the review queues. As part of this update, we were also able to make the queues responsive and utilize mobile-friendly UI components. Changes  Actions menu -  We’ve removed the action buttons for a menu-style component. Selecting an action now requires a bit of pause and mitigates robo-reviewer behaviors we've seen in the past. Instructions are now always visible and associated with each action.  More context - Users can now toggle between the review task and the necessary context (original question, answers, and comments) on the task page to assist in making educated decisions on a task. No need to open new browser tabs!  Vote controls and follow feature - We heard from you that being able to vote directly on all tasks as well as the option to follow posts and receive updates on changes would help in the reviewing process. These features will be available in all queues.  Filter button - We’re highlighting this feature (where it’s available) with a button and replacing the easily missed text-link.  Review count - We’ve removed the badge progress bar in lieu of keeping track of how many tasks you can complete in a queue (don’t worry, the badge bar isn’t gone).   Review home page  The review homepage has received a Stacks update as well, setting it up for forthcoming plans to create better onboarding for new reviewers. This page now provides a bit more information to new reviewers. Changes  Only the queues available/earned by the user are clickable  Includes additional text about necessary reputation to earn access to new queues  Available queues are prioritized to the top and then sorted by the number of tasks in each queue   Additional updates   All aspects of the Review queues are receiving some much needed design attention. Here a few more changes you can expect to see:  There is more incentive to continue reviewing. The Steward badge can now be earned multiple times for every 1,000 reviews in each queue. If you have already completed 2,000 or more reviews, we will backfill any additional Steward badges that you have already earned. You can expect to see them accrue over the next few days.  History view - Added and rearranged a few UI components so that users can better navigate and utilize the page  Stats view - Updated badge progress bar   Feedback Please leave any feedback or bug reports related to this release below this post. We will be reviewing responses on this post for one month following Phase 3 (March 23, 2021). After March 23rd, please ask a new question to report any new issues.
56854
Is there a way to subscribe to a question and be notified more frequently than once a day?  I'd like to be notified immediately on any posts to a question.