I'm trying to create a program in which the first step is for the user to input their name (in the User class). I wanted to create a method (in another class) that specifically reads the input and then implement that method in my User class.  However, I'm getting a NullPointerException error and I don't quite understand why.   public class Main {      public static void main(String[] args) {          User newUser=new User();          newUser.CreateName();       }  }  public class User {      UserInput ui;      public void CreateName(){          System.out.println("Enter your name:");          String name= ui.Input();      }  }  public class UserInput {      public String Input(){          Scanner input=new Scanner(System.in);          String s=input.nextLine();          return s;      }  }
129
What are Null Pointer Exceptions (java.lang.NullPointerException) and what causes them?  What methods/tools can be used to determine the cause so that you stop the exception from causing the program to terminate prematurely?
34848
I used to use the implicit call of toString when wanting some debug info about an object, because in case of the object is null it does not throw an Exception.  For instance:    System.out.println("obj: "+obj);   instead of:  System.out.println("obj: "+obj.toString());   Is there any difference apart from the null case? Can the latter case work, when the former does not?  Edit: What exactly is done, in case of the implicit call?
113807
Why does the following code not work?  I want to instantiate prefabs in a list and then use  it as a GameObject like that :  public GameObject prefab;  void Start() {   ArrayList players = new ArrayList();    for(int i=0; i&lt;5; i++)   {         players.Add( (GameObject)Instantiate(prefab));   }    players[2].transform.position = new Vector3(1, 1, 1);  }   there is an error message
38779
I'm new to Apex and development in general... So, I'm playing around coding and doing some badges in Trailhead. I created a small piece of code, as below, and have no actual use: public class GenderIdentifier {     public void DetermineGender(String Gender){                 if (Gender == 'Man'){             Gender = 'Male';             } else {             Gender = 'Female';         }            } }  If I make the method 'non-static' it works, and I can see it working fine executing as a anonymous block. If I make it static, I can't execute the anonymous block, as I get an Error like:  Non static method cannot be referenced from a static context: void GenderIdentifier.DetermineGender(String)  What am I doing wrong? It would make sense to have a method like this as Static. I think I misunderstood the concept of static methods.
111151
Can I simply use  if(myString == nil)   For some reason a string that I know is null, is failing this statement.
13332
I am trying to use a  as input and then creating a query with it - so I need a .    I was surprised to find that it couldn't do the conversion implicitly or explicitly - but I don't even know how I would do this, as the Java API is still fairly new to me.
1905
I ran into an interesting (and very frustrating) issue with the equals() method today which caused what I thought to be a well tested class to crash and cause a bug that took me a very long time to track down.   Just for completeness, I wasn't using an IDE or debugger - just good old fashioned text editor and System.out's. Time was very limited and it was a school project.  Anyhow -   I was developing a basic shopping cart which could contain an ArrayList of Book objects. In order to implement the addBook(), removeBook(), and hasBook() methods of the Cart, I wanted to check if the Book already existed in the Cart. So off I go -  public boolean equals(Book b) {     ... // More code here - null checks     if (b.getID() == this.getID()) return true;     else return false; }   All works fine in testing. I create 6 objects and fill them with data. Do many adds, removes, has() operations on the Cart and everything works fine. I read that you can either have equals(TYPE var) or equals(Object o) { (CAST) var } but assumed that since it was working, it didn't matter too much.  Then I ran into a problem - I needed to create a Book object with only the ID in it from within the Book class. No other data would be entered into it. Basically the following:  public boolean hasBook(int i) {     Book b = new Book(i);     return hasBook(b); }  public boolean hasBook(Book b) {     // .. more code here     return this.books.contains(b); }   All of a sudden, the equals(Book b) method no longer works. This took a VERY long time to track down without a good debugger and assuming the Cart class was properly tested and correct. After swaapping the equals() method to the following:  public boolean equals(Object o) {     Book b = (Book) o;     ... // The rest goes here    }   Everything began to work again. Is there a reason the method decided not to take the Book parameter even though it clearly  was  a Book object? The only difference seemed to be it was instantiated from within the same class, and only filled with one data member. I'm very very confused. Please, shed some light?
85933
I was writing a toString() for a class in Java the other day by manually writing out each element of the class to a String and it occurred to me that using reflection it might be possible to create a generic toString() method that could work on ALL classes. I.E. it would figure out the field names and values and send them out to a String.  Getting the field names is fairly simple, here is what a co-worker came up with:  public static List initFieldArray(String className) throws ClassNotFoundException {      Class c = Class.forName(className);     Field field[] = c.getFields();     List&lt;String&gt; classFields = new ArrayList(field.length);      for (int i = 0; i &lt; field.length; i++) {         String cf = field[i].toString();         classFields.add(cf.substring(cf.lastIndexOf(".") + 1));     }      return classFields; }   Using a factory I could reduce the performance overhead by storing the fields once, the first time the toString() is called. However finding the values could be a lot more expensive.  Due to the performance of reflection this may be more hypothetical then practical. But I am interested in the idea of reflection and how I can use it to improve my everyday programming.
119160
This Trigger is on lead (Before Insert, Before Update) and it errors (System.NullPointerException: Attempt to de-reference a null object). I'm getting this error when i'm posting "Web to Lead". However i do have the right ORG iD and Record type id included on the xml file:   &lt;input type=hidden name="oid" value="xxxxxxxxxxxxx"&gt; &lt;input type=hidden name="recordType" id="recordType" value="zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz"&gt;    trigger IAAILeadTrigger on Lead (before insert, before update){ //BEGIN: S-444340 T-561808 - Process only IAA Remarketing Recordtype data     Map&lt;ID,Schema.RecordTypeInfo&gt; rt_Map = Lead.sObjectType.getDescribe().getRecordTypeInfosById();      //Looks up the branches based on the Lead PostalCode     if(trigger.isBefore){          for(Lead ld : trigger.new){                      if (rt_map.get(ld.recordTypeID).getName().containsIgnoreCase('IAA Remarketing') )                if( trigger.isInsert ||                    (trigger.isUpdate &amp;&amp; ld.Branch__c == null) ||                   (trigger.isUpdate &amp;&amp; ld.PostalCode != trigger.oldMap.get(ld.id).PostalCode)               ){                   leads.add(ld);               }           }           }                 //Only check the leads that are in the lead list and NOT the full trigger.new list         if(!leads.isEmpty()){             LeadController.GetLeadBranches(leads);           }     }  }
105546
When modelling classes, what is the preferred way of initializing:   Constructors, or Factory Methods   And what would be the considerations for using either of them?  In certain situations, I prefer having a factory method which returns null if the object cannot be constructed. This makes the code neat. I can simply check if the returned value is not null before taking alternative action, in contrast with throwing an exception from the constructor. (I personally don't like exceptions)  Say, I have a constructor on a class which expects an id value. The constructor uses this value to populate the class from the database. In the case where a record with the specified id does not exist, the constructor throws a RecordNotFoundException. In this case I will have to enclose the construction of all such classes within a try..catch block.  In contrast to this I can have a static factory method on those classes which will return null if the record is not found.  Which approach is better in this case, constructor or factory method?
101466
I have the following situation I think would be best to show in sample program code.  I have a Java class that extends JPanel.  In this class are two objects which are two more JPanels.  In one of the JPanel objects is a JTable object.  I added a listener to this JTable that detects a double click.  When it detects a double click, I want to fire a method in the top class.  How do I reference this method in Java?  public class TopPanel extends JPanel {    JPanel OnePanel;   JPanel TwoPanel;    public void MethodToFire;  }  public class OnePanel extends JPanel {    JTable TheTable;  }  public class TheTable extends JTable {    public TheTable {     this.addMouseListener(new MouseAdapter(){       public void mouseClicked(MouseEvent e){           if (e.getClickCount() == 2){ SYNTAX CALLING THE METHOD IN TopPanel  }       }     } );   } }
116653
I have this:  If String.IsNullOrEmpty(editTransactionRow.pay_id.ToString()) = False Then     stTransactionPaymentID = editTransactionRow.pay_id 'Check for null value End If   Now, when editTransactionRow.pay_id is Null Visual Basic throws an exception. Is there something wrong with this code?
40938
After I posted this question, I found a similar post that seemed to answer it: . I'll leave this in place for now, as I am not sure how to mark my own question as a duplicate  In attempting to debug a SOQL query error, I encountered a strange behavior with Database.query and bind variables. Specifically, when I run this code:  String userQuery = 'SELECT Id FROM User'; if (true) {     List&lt;String&gt; firstNames = new List&lt;String&gt;{'James','Joe'};     userQuery += ' WHERE FirstName IN :firstNames'; } Database.query(userQuery);   the Database.query statement executes with no errors, despite the fact that the variable firstNames does not exist in its context. However, when I add an else clause:  String userQuery = 'SELECT Id FROM User'; if (true) {     List&lt;String&gt; firstNames = new List&lt;String&gt;{'James','Joe'};     userQuery += ' WHERE FirstName IN :firstNames'; } else {     List&lt;String&gt; firstNames; } Database.query(userQuery);   I receive a null object reference exception. It seems like Salesforce is checking to see if the variable is only declared once beforehand and, if so, uses its value in the context it was declared. This seems strange to me, so I was wondering if anybody here has any insight into what is going on under the hood.
34071
Consider this:  public class TestClass {      private String a;     private String b;      public TestClass()     {     a = "initialized";     }      public void doSomething()     {     String c;          a.notify(); // This is fine     b.notify(); // This is fine - but will end in an exception     c.notify(); // "Local variable c may not have been initialised"     }  }   I don't get it. "b" is never initialized but will give the same run-time error as "c", which is a compile-time error. Why the difference between local variables and members?  Edit: making the members private was my initial intention, and the question still stands...
77222
I have a really simple Java class that effectively decorates a Map with input validation, with the obvious void set() and String get() methods.  I'd like to be able to effectively call those methods and handle return values and exceptions from outside the JVM, but still on the same machine Update: the caller I have in mind is not another JVM; thanks @Dave Ray  My implementation considerations are typical    performance ease of implementation and maintenance (simplicity?) reliability flexibility (i.e. can I call from a remote machine, etc.)   Is there a 'right way?' If not, what are my options, and what are the pro/cons for each?  (Stuff people have actually done and can provide real-life feedback on would be great!)
57448
So, I've been spending considerable more time on SO recently than I normally have, and one thing that I've noticed is quite a few people saying stuff like "There's a Null Pointer Error in this block of code, please help me fix it", with a huge amount of code posted, and no real clue as to where the NPE is. So my question is, what can we do to accomplish 2 goals?   Help the person asking the question become a better programmer. Help them to solve their problems.
110175
I am receiving an error stated above on line 26**(listAccount1)**, can anyone guide me on how to solve it?  public class FRB_UpdateExceptionsforBatch {    public static void FRB_Exceptions(){    string FRBRecordTypeID = utility.getFRBProfileNameLabel();       List&lt;Account&gt; lstAccount = new List&lt;Account&gt;();         List&lt;Account&gt; lstAccount1 = new List&lt;Account&gt;();         List&lt;Account&gt; lstAccount2 = new List&lt;Account&gt;();         List&lt;Account&gt; lstAccount3 = new List&lt;Account&gt;();    lstAccount = [Select id,FRB_Firm_Check__c,Number_of_Exception__c,Number_of_exceptions_under_4_6_bucket__c,Number_of_exceptions_under_7_10_bucket__c,Number_of_exceptions_under_11_19_bucket__c,(select id,Account_Standing__c from Process_Adherence_Monitoring__r  where Status__C != 'Closed' AND  recordtypeId =: FRBRecordTypeID AND Account_Standing__c = '0-3 Days (Green - New Exception)' ) FROM Account WHERE FRB_Firm_Check__c = TRUE];     if(lstAccount.size()&gt;0){           for( Account acc : lstAccount )           {               List&lt;Process_Adherence_Monitoring__c&gt; lstCont = acc.Process_Adherence_Monitoring__r;                acc.Number_of_Exception__c = lstCont.size();               acc.FRB_Firm_Check__c = true;           }            update lstAccount;     }         //To update 4-6 bucket      lstAccount1 = [select Id, Name,FRB_Firm_Check__c, Number_of_exceptions_under_4_6_bucket__c,(select id,Account_Standing__c from Process_Adherence_Monitoring__r  where Status__C != 'Closed' AND  recordtypeId =: FRBRecordTypeID AND Account_Standing__c = '4-6 Days (Yellow - Outside Correction Timeframe)' ) from Account where FRB_Firm_Check__c = TRUE];        if(lstAccount1.size()&gt;0){           for( Account acc : lstAccount1 )           {               List&lt;Process_Adherence_Monitoring__c&gt; lstCont1 = acc.Process_Adherence_Monitoring__r;                              acc.Number_of_exceptions_under_4_6_bucket__c= lstCont1.size();               acc.FRB_Firm_Check__c = true;           }            update lstAccount1 ;       }         //To update 6-11 bucket         lstAccount2 =  [select Id, Name,FRB_Firm_Check__c, Number_of_exceptions_under_7_10_bucket__c,(select id,Account_Standing__c from Process_Adherence_Monitoring__r  where Status__C != 'Closed' AND  recordtypeId =: FRBRecordTypeID AND Account_Standing__c = '7-10 Days (Orange - Approaching Critical Timeframe)' ) from Account where FRB_Firm_Check__c = TRUE];        if(lstAccount2.size()&gt;0){           for( Account acc : lstAccount2 )           {               List&lt;Process_Adherence_Monitoring__c&gt; lstCont2 = acc.Process_Adherence_Monitoring__r;                acc.Number_of_exceptions_under_7_10_bucket__c= lstCont2.size();               acc.FRB_Firm_Check__c = true;           }           update lstAccount2 ;       }        //To update 11 bucket            lstAccount3 =  [select Id, Name,FRB_Firm_Check__c, Number_of_exceptions_under_11_19_bucket__c,(select id,Account_Standing__c from Process_Adherence_Monitoring__r  where Status__C != 'Closed' AND  recordtypeId =: FRBRecordTypeID AND Account_Standing__c = '11-19 Days (Red - Immediate Correction Required)' ) from Account where FRB_Firm_Check__c = TRUE];        if(lstAccount3.size()&gt;0){           for( Account acc : lstAccount3 )           {               List&lt;Process_Adherence_Monitoring__c&gt; lstCont3 = acc.Process_Adherence_Monitoring__r;                acc.Number_of_exceptions_under_11_19_bucket__c= lstCont3.size();               acc.FRB_Firm_Check__c = true;           }                              update lstAccount3 ;       }      }   }