Context: We are planning to run promotional campaign for hiring engineering talent, and thinking which one these promotional sentences are more correct/connecting or simply better?  Sentence 1  20 Reasons to work at X.  Sentence 2  20 Reasons to work with X.  Sentence 3  20 Reasons to work for X.  Which of the above sentence is more promising and correct for our campaign or website?
24485
The prepositions “with”, “at” and “for” are also used to associate a business title with a company's name. It seems that they are interchangeable, with no (significant) difference in meaning. The following examples taken from The New York Times website seem to confirm that:      Until now, said Justin Nielson, a senior analyst for the media   research firm SNL Kagan, “there really hasn't been any direct   competitor . . .      “The consumer is still deleveraging,” said Jason Goldberg, a senior   analyst with Barclays. “It's not a lack of supply; it's a lack of   demand.”      “There’s the party of fear and the party of despair,” Nikos Xydakis, a   political analyst and an editor at Kathimerini daily, said.   Are they really the same as for meaning? If it isn't so, what is the difference between them?
123917
The single sentence:     The novel tells the story of a salesman.   Can I say:      The novel tells a story of a salesman?   I chose a story, but the answer is the story.
73160
What are the differences between these two phrasal verbs and what are the best situations to use each?
50790
I am not quite sure whether in the following sentence the construction of the verbs and the rest of wording are correct:     Should the construction of the University Hospital be completed, this would indeed set new standards - both in terms of size ("one of Germany’s largest university hospitals") as well as with a view to the technological advances.
46050
Which of the sentences below are correct, and why? Which one would you prefer to use, and where are you from?   "The course materials are only available in English language." "The course materials are only available in the English language." "The course materials are only available in English."   Thanks!
64412
This is what I want to express:     I want to get to know more algorithms that have been created.   I have thought about changing the sentence into     I want to gain a better insight into algorithms that have been created.   But it seems inappropriate.  Any better phrase (or single word) to replace get to know?   (Or better way to construct the sentence?)
63225
Which of these two sentences is correct? And why?     A) We can't play tennis if it will be rainy tomorrow.   B) We can't play tennis if it is rainy tomorrow.
14838
Which is the correct use of these two words, and in which context should one be used rather than the other?
87147
A: "I assume you know how this works."   B: "I am assuming you know how this works."   So if you expect someone to know how to use a certain machine for instance could you say either of the too? I cant make out a difference in meaning so if there is none which would be the preferred choice for most speakers?
84854
Which is correct?         I am writing to apply for the position of ____ in your company.   I am writinng to apply for the position of ____ at your company.   I am writinng to apply for the position of ____ for your company.
48208
Which one is correct? Leaning towards first one but I am unsure because a more basic version would be "How good is it?"
120600
Context: the last version I played was AD&amp;D (ie. 1e) where characters could (technically) progress to unlimited levels. Looking at the 5e PHB I get a sense that 20th level is now a concrete ceiling in terms of character level, and no progression beyond that is possible -- but I can't find it explicitly stated anywhere. Is this the case?   (NB. I'd have no objection to a Lvl20 limit, but I'd like to know for definite, since of course it has a major impact on how one plans a multi-class character).
29875
This is from a multiple choice question with 4 options, but I narrowed it down to 2:     Select the best version of the following sentence:    (there is really no sentence after this, just the answer choices)         a) Each of the conference rooms has a computer display.   d) Each of the conference rooms have computer displays.      In my eyes these choices are both perfectly fine, I can't see anything wrong with either of them.
3200
Given the following sentences:   They helped us frame some experimental evaluations. They helped us to frame some experimental evaluations. They helped us in framing some experimental evaluations. They helped us on framing some experimental evaluations.   Are all them grammatically correct or not? Are there any semantical nuances introduced by each alternative (and why), or do they mean exactly the same? Are there any other alternatives besides these 4 to convey the same meaning? Finally, which alternative is the best one, or does it depend on the context or writing style?
40639
I have one question, what is the best way to say that sentence below? Are both grammatically correct?     He has been working on mobile development for 4 years and has published more than 15 apps.   or     He has been working on mobile development for 4 years, having published more than 15 apps.
13050
I'm wondering how it is correct to structure sentence and what punctuation should be used. In particular, is the next sentence correct:     I was wondering if there's any progress on the issue.    Or should I put a question mark in the end of it. Also, can it be restructured to:     I was wondering: is there any progress on the issue?
16954
Recently, while skimming through an article I came across a sentence which is as follows.  The five minute walk will connect you with life.  My rationale says it should have been &quot;five minutes&quot; and not &quot;five minute&quot;. Kindly advise where am I going wrong?