Following , I found out that currently you cannot view the content of the question you just reviewed in the Low quality post review queue. Instead, you just the set of actions other reviewers (and you) have done. See for example on :    See the difference with a review to an answer, for example on , where the content of the post appears normally:
4964
On Ask Ubuntu, when I try to view my Low Quality Posts review history and click on the action taken on questions, I can only see the actions taken and no preview of the question.   :    The question still exists on the site:   It seems question review history page is missing this HTML class:  &lt;div class="reviewable-post reviewable-post-post_id"&gt;   On the other hand, everything is working fine for answers.
111422
I was just reviewing the  and I came across  and flag description:    The answer has been flagged as very low quality and then it also has a flag that says:     It's not an answer, or at least not to this question, however this was accepted instead of the real answer. – May 7 '12 at 5:53  × 4   Now I am in the review queue a lot and I don't recall ever seeing this before, is this an other flag that is being shown?  What is this unusual description that I am seeing?
19791
I'm still becoming increasingly confused as to why we can't do or see certain things (really, just about anything except for answer a question) from the Review interface.  Today, it's comment voting.  I came across a question in the close queue where another person had already left a comment that clearly described why the question should be closed.  Sometimes, I'll come across other questions where a commenter has also clearly stated what can be done to improve this question so that it will either not be closed or will be a good candidate for getting re-opened.  Often times, in either case, the thread is still worth my close vote because it is either off-topic, low quality, or missing out on some other SE criteria, and it does not contain enough detail for me to feel confident that I can edit it into a good question that is still valuable to its original author.  I personally feel that, in most cases, it is our responsibility to the question author to give them feedback if we are going to down-vote or vote-to-close their question.  Sometimes, the feedback is clear enough in the close reason but this is only visible after the final vote - and even then, only the option selected by the majority is shown.  For instances where I'm giving a down-vote, or I'm one of the first-through-fourth people voting to close, the comment space is my only real option for giving feedback to the author.  Regardless, I feel that providing feedback to the author is essential in helping them to learn how to write better questions, write questions that better fit the StackExchange model, and get answers that are both useful to them and the community.  However, in cases where another person's comment already clearly and thoroughly relates my concerns regarding the post, it's often preferable that I up-vote the existing comment instead of leaving my own, redundant comment to clutter up the thread.  This is not currently an option from within the Review interface.  Interestingly enough, I'm allowed to leave a comment but I'm not allowed to vote on existing comments.  If I want to vote on an existing comment, I need to follow one of two processes - the choice between which is pretty much determined by the first step in each:   Remember that the Review interface will immediately leave the question when I choose an action option. Open one of the links to the question in a new, background tab in my browser. Choose my action for the question.   If necessary, choose the reason for my action. If necessary, select other options (i.e.: duplicate question) to complete the action.  Switch to the question's tab. Vote on the comment. Close the question's tab and go back to reviewing, or doing whatever else I was going to do.   OR   Forget that the Review interface will immediately leave the question when I choose an action option. Choose my action for the question.   If necessary, choose the reason for my action. If necessary, select other options (i.e.: duplicate question) to complete the action.  Open a new browser tab with the main site interface. Search for and open the question. Vote on the comment. Close the question's tab and go back to reviewing, or doing whatever else I was going to do.   Each of these workflows has four steps (italicized), plus associated page loading times, that I would not need to go through if the option to vote on a comment was simply included in the Review interface.  So, for the sake of our time and sanity - the savings of which, I believe, is the primary goal of this interface in the first place - please add or restore this functionality.
59430
The current format of showing review history works fine without bug. But, we should intend to change the format of that page to add some more precise.  We are showing the reviewer name in the review history. I think there is no need of showing that, as the reviewer is seeing his/her own history.    We should remove that and get some more space for other reasonable details. We can also have titles for the details showing on like post, action, time, etc. Provided screenshot is for suggested edit review history. We can have unique format changes for each review type.
2736
I was reviewing some stuff today, and I came across a rather ridiculous answer (see screenshot). I wanted to see the question and other answers, so I clicked on the link, and found that the answer I was reviewing was in fact deleted. Could someone take a look at it?
74957
This is sort of a follow-up to a feature request that resulted in obscuring spam / offensive content from 10K-visible answers:   Suggest the same to be done for questions. As of now, spam questions (, ) preserve their titles and content. Suggest to revise the titles to something like     This question was marked as spam or offensive and is therefore not shown   And the text to something like:     This question was marked as spam or offensive and is therefore not shown - you can see the revision history for details".   Where "the revision history" links to the question revision history.    For those interested, here is a link to screen shots of how spam shines through my flagging summary page and is displayed to me when I click the link to one of deleted questions: .  For the sake of precision, flagger having less than 10K rep would see only upper screen shot - the one that lists question titles ("Call giRℒs blah blah &lt;phone number&gt;") - in their  page.
40445
In the last few weeks, the 'review' button at the top of stackoverflow.com has become very slow. I can count to 20 in some cases (but not always).   In a perhaps related phenomenon, I believe that test questions in the queue often trigger a level of extreme slowness all their very own. If I click on a queue, or 'next' after a review, and the periods sit there throbbing for a good long time, chances are that what will show up will be a review audit.
52432
I'd like to be more aware of when other SOpedians edit my own questions and answers, which is sure to happen because my innate spelling and grammar skills are  overloaded by my vocabulary and lackadaisical proofreading habits.  That said, I would like to review edits to my posts to ensure the basic content has not changed.    What do folks think of this?  EDIT:  So, apparently there is the revisions tab, which I had not seen.  But revisions are not in the summary page, which I'd like to see.
29166
If a user asked a question and got an answer which was not helpful.  After sometime the answerer edits the answer with some good content. How the OP will get to know that?  Is it necessary to add comment check my edited answer?  We can say that the OP should refresh the page to find the helpful answer.  Consider if the OP finds the answer as helpful and accepted that. After sometime if the answerer/anyother user edit the answer to change the content which may not solve the issue.   How will it be notified to OP?  currently we are notifying the OP when there is any comment to the queation or any new answers or any comments with the name of OP with @ to any answer.  This will lead the future visitors to confuse and reduce the quality of post.  Can we have a notification to the original poster when the answer to any of his/her question got edited?
74968
I just discovered that it is possible to get a post in the Low Quality Posts review queue that you have already flagged for closing, making reviewing that item impossible. Obviously, I don't want to 'Looks Good' something that I know should be closed, but at the same time I cannot 'Recommend Close' something I have already flagged leaving the only option being to skip the post.  Can the queue be changed so that it does not show posts which you have already flagged?
23067
On a recent review audit on SU, I clicked "Edit" and was greeted with the plain text "This post was deleted and cannot be edited". It wasn't in a popup box or anything; the actual page consisted of just that text, with no formatting (as though it were the only content of the HTML page). This makes it really obvious I'm dealing with an audit.
2048
I think many of us already aware, still I wanted to let you know that First Post and Late Answers review posts are generated on specific time interval. When time comes for post generation I follow some tricks   Click and till a Post appears for review Then right-click and select Open in new tab 5-8 time. Then in every page follow the below steps   Open the Question of post appeared in review in New tab If Page/Question not exists then simply downvote since post was deleted because of -ve response. Else if page exists then   Check the review post's Net Reputation If reputation is -ve then simply downvote the post came in review Else one may select No Action needed.    This way if in any case a post comes for "Are you paying attention" can be handled easily.  I think if a post comes in review should not allow to view post.
78153
I've been reviewing suggested edits lately, and have come across a problem in the queue: we don't have the normal 'flag' link for the post. I'm not talking about flagging the edit, but the post itself. Often, I will come across a post that, though the edit does improve it, still is low quality, and should be flagged as such. While I want to give the user recognition for trying to improve the post, I also want to let the mods know that it's low quality - and having to go to the question in the normal view isn't very fun for this. So, please add a flag link below posts in the Suggested Edits queue.
90634
I'm blocked from reviewing for some time, but I'm not blocked from editing. I would like to edit someone's question, but there is another suggested edit review pending. I can't approve it because of the review ban, but also I can't do any other edit as when I click "edit" it redirects me to approve the edit. Is that expected or this is a bug?
41429
I have noticed a behaviour that may or may not be a  bug. It is a discrepancy between the preview and the rendered result, which is why I would need to post a question to check it out.  Is there an official place to do that?
23185
How should SO handle users who don't "maintain" their questions by selecting answers, or remarking newer/better answers as the chosen one?  Many questions...   Have no answer marked correct, even when one is plainly there Are not reviewed by the poster to select a new correct answer   I don't mind taking the time to answer questions, but don't see the point when I don't get "reputation" for doing so since no one reads those questions, and reputation seems to be the point of the site.  I think the "remind to accept an answer" feature is there now, since I just saw it when coming back.  I missed it the first time though.
44960
I was reviewing a post in the First Posts Queue when I came across a question I wanted to answer, for reference the question I am talking about is linked this one:    I noticed some easy edits that would make it look nice however when I clicked the edit button nothing happened (as if the edit link was dead).  I opened the question in a normal link and the warning regarding an edit is curently waiting popped up:    I would imagine that in the a review queue if someone tries to edit a question (as they would in a normal question) this warning should also pop up but it did not for me.  Is this a bug?