Referenced question:   It has tags: symlink, vagrant, 'virtualbox,chef`  As the title mentions, it's about symlink mainly, other tags are just assocation with the context of the question.  If you see the view of the question, the question appears as if this is a virtualbox question.    I am not sure of the algorithm it uses to pick a tag to show in the page, but I think there should be a way to pick primary tag, it could be as simple as respecting the order by which it was added in the question.
122033
As far as I know, if I have some tags in a question, system will choose the tag which has more questions as main tag (shows in title of page)  But, sometimes this is not correct. For example, I have a question about PhoneGap which applies to both android and iOS. So my question is about PhoneGap, not Android. but system chooses Android as main tag...  Is there any way to manually choose the main tag of a question? if not, Isn't it better to have a feature like this?
74961
On September 29th, I created the  tag for  Today, while checking the tag description, I saw that the  seems to be .  Why is that? Why has the Community user "stolen" the spot as author of the tag?
41188
I have found another indicator that reveals a post to be an audit in the review queue. The question did not show the tags, although they are normally shown. Here is the image(the image is after I passed, but it didn't show the tags before either):  Review with no tags:    Proof it has tags:    And here is an image of a real review on a question that showed the tags (even though they weren't being changed), which I believe is normal:  Non-audit review with tags:    Obviously, things that indicate that the review is an audit is bad (I have found several, check my previous posts). If someone can please confirm that this is a bug so that it can be fixed?  EDIT: This appears to not be a "known-good audit".
99594
A few questions I've run into lately are somewhat confusing, because they are vaguely asking about client-side operations and tagged with .  This can lead to users posting answers that are web related and not client related, or to situations like the one that , where my editing the question and answering the question became sort of a conflict of interest.  It seems likely, in the two instances of this that I've run into in this week alone, that the OP originally specified  for the question, which would have automatically synonymized to .  The questions are too vague with the latter.  In order to clarify these questions from web-related questions, I've been adding .  In this case, however, because I'd also answered the question I was accused of editing the question to fit my answer.  It could be that the assumptions I made were wrong, though I believe it's highly unlikely and I think that's probably a topic for a different post.  There's also a  complaining about this problem, and it does appear to be causing confusion.  JScript is a flavour of ECMAScript, as is JavaScript, so I can understand the desire to have the synonym, but I think in this case an exception should be made.  Examples:    (Conflicted answers, assuming browser or wsh)  (Comments required OP to clarify)  (First answer assumes browser)
20923
In the website some Meta tags are coloured differently. I think this should be replicated on the android app.    Thinking about it I think the required meta tags, feature-request, support, discussion and bug should also be highlighted in some way, as they are on the desktop version.
32704
Can someone please create the tag  on our site? We need to have it because        Foo is a recent/upcoming release / edition / model / episode of a popular, established OS / board game / bike brand / TV show   Foo is a hot new language / ingredient / game   we're currently using some other tag for questions about Foo, but it's causing ambiguity with a separate thing that's also named Foo      This is not a joke post. We get a lot of feature requests that ask for this or that tag to be created, and every time, a discussion ensues wherein people explain that there is no "tag creation department" and that community members create tags just by using them. I'm posting this "question" so that future requests of that type can be closed as a duplicate of this, saving time and eliminating redundant conversations for everyone involved.     See also:
45898
Say, there's a Java (C#, Javascript, etc) question involving array and tagged only 'java'. Two months ago nobody would lift a finger to add 'arrays' tag: the benefit is tiny, if it exists at all.  Yet, last few days I've been noticing a lot of such edits and not sure what to do. Some users even go on retagging rampage, updating every question they can lay their hands on (you can see them repeatedly in the list of pending edits).  I don't mind those guys getting their lousy 1000 reputation this way (well, only a little), but somehow I feel that the system was intended for slightly more substantial changes.    What would you do in this case? Approve or reject?  PS Some examples from the last few minutes
94052
I am seeing this happen again and again. Sometimes people tag the .NET and C# questions with "assembly" tag while in reality it belongs for Assembly programming questions.
76370
I wanted to look for some questions to answer, so I went to . It came up with some really weird tags, as seen in this image:        , , , , and  are the tags in which I have the most posts. I also have  that has the tags , , and .  When I clicked on |bug|reputation|achievements-dialog|:        After I gave myself a favorite tag it acted as normal filtering the unanswered questions by that tag.
71683
Just found one question on SO with the tag . Got intrigued and went after explanation. Found empty wiki but used in 458 questions. Edit: 241 179 150 61 50 now.  0 to go!  Some tagged it because of , others relating to , others , etc  I feel this is a confusing and not helpful tag. Can someone clarify it so we can add a wiki to it, or should this tag be burninated?
79394
I want to search for several related tags at once. When I type multiple tag-names in the search box, only one gets selected and I have to sift through a horde of non-pertinent questions.   E.g. 1: I want to find all questions where 'java' AND 'netbeans' AND 'tomcat' all are defined per question.  E.g. 2: (this may be a bit much to hope for) I want to find all questions where 'java' AND 'netbeans' BUT_NOT 'tomcat' is defined.  Alternatively, is there a way to search through the previous search results?  Is this possible?
18989
It looks like the  tag (later renamed to ) is a holdover from the pre-split days when this site was called Meta Stack Overflow and also served as the meta site for Stack Overflow (in addition to its current purpose). It was intended to disambiguate questions about the SE network as a whole from questions specifically about Stack Overflow (). It has nearly 1,500 uses, so it's too big to clean up manually. It looks like people are still using it on new questions, and I just saw a suggested edit that only added this tag. Since all questions here should be about Stack Exchange, can we burninate this, the ultimate meta tag?
105142
I'm starting to write a book on . Since I've been contributing on this tag for a long time, I had the opportunity to read &amp; answer several interesting threads on Stackoverflow related to this technology.  I would like to discuss some of the interesting cases published on Stackoverflow in my book, and I wonder if I could use the images and code shared on those threads in it.  I'm hoping somebody from StackExchange could clarify about the copyright status of the material shared on Stackoverflow questions/answers.
36978
With the tag page changed, there are some.. let's call them "controversial" opinions whether it's an improvement or not; I'd rather not comment on that, but point out a certain "feature" in the tag excerpts wikis which are shown on the \tags page:  Case in point from the TeX-SE tags page:      The  tag wiki excerpt reads:     TeX and friends give you the resources to put text in the header and footer of your document. This tag is for questions relating to this.   Huh?   I thought it was just someone was being lazy not providing a proper tag description. But it turned out that this happens on a lot more tags, to a different degree. The layout script, or whatever it is, tries to be clever, and removes some stuff in front of the tag excerpts to avoid repetition, presumably.   The cases I noticed so far:   "Questions tagged with [foo]" "This tag is about" "Choose this tag if your question is" "Use the [foo] tag for" "[foo] is" "This tag"   .. and probably more, I'm too lazy to search.   The point is -- the script tries to be clever and removes whole sentences, leaving weird and incomplete description, which is what tag wikis are all about.   Now, the questions:   Is this  or a bug? How exactly does it work? What template for tag excerpts should we use to avoid ridiculous entries like the one shown?
50936
The /tools route shows you a list of the 30 (?) newest tags on the site, including how often they've been used.  Now, this is nice information to have, and occasionally I check the route to kill off meaningless tags before they're getting used too much. However, it seems I'm only one of the very few people on Super User who do that.    Since the list only shows 30 tags, it's a little hard to analyze properly. You can't see when the tag was created and who created it. (Let's face it: There are some people who have a passion for creating meaningless tags.) Also, you have to remove a tag in that list before the next one shows up, which is a little tedious.  For example. in the above list, I had to kill ,  and  before I even saw  and .  Could moderators (and 10k users?) please get a table of the newest tags that'd allow them to see more than 30 at once, and also including the information who created the tag?  This would allow for much easier maintenance, even when you forget to do it for the last 30 days and have no way to check tags that were created, say 31 days ago.
80135
It is (currently)   to tag answers. Yet, if I query , then  does have a tag, namely javascript. I'm at a loss: how did that happen?&dagger;  SELECT Id, Tag FROM Posts, PostsTags  WHERE Posts.PostTypeId = 2 AND Posts.Id = PostsTags.PostId   Edit: The are also five answers (, , ,  and ) with a view count of 1 instead of 0:  SELECT Id, ViewCount FROM Posts WHERE PostTypeId = 2 AND ViewCount &lt;&gt; 0   These results also hold through at least January 10.    &nbsp; &dagger;: PostTypeId = 2 means that the post is an answer, not a question (PostTypeId = 1).
21723
Ding!  Hello, new feature!  I just noticed a new "Frequently Asked" section on the main page.  I'm guessing it's a test of a new feature, like the recent .  Seems cool so far.  But what is it populated with?  Common dupes?  Topics the viewing user asks about a lot?  Topics the viewing user searches for a lot?  For what it's worth, I'm getting a link to the  tag underneath it.