I have added Schema Code (Json Ld) for organisation with ratings, there's no error in the Structured data testing tool + it shows correctly in the preview result. But even then the Ratings are not being shown on Google Search.
44368
I have added  to my site and I can confirm that  has no issues with my code. After waiting some time Google has enabled review stars on all pages apart from the home page.  Using Google's Site Search Command: site:http://www.example.com reveals:    Question:   How do I enable rich snippets on the homepage so Google displays review stars using Schema Aggregate Rating?
45662
After the performance problems we have run into with  we've decided to make a change, we're moving the network on to .  Here's where to get started:   What works:   All search operators should be in Many changes below from the old search behavior   What's different:   The new search is AND, adding a search term will narrow your results, not expand them. The look of search results is now more unified with the following differences between Q&amp;A:   "Q:" or "A:" prefix Answer counts and tags will be present in questions. The answer count will be highlighted in green if it's accepted. (We may index other things later, that's why the results are more generic/google-y now.)  It's faster, about 5-10x faster for almost all searches on large sites like Stack&nbsp;Overflow Quoted phrases are exact matches except for case-sensitivity, for example,  or . If not in a quoted phrase, words will now be stemmed () Snippets for context will now be more relevant Excludes are now explicitly supported (like -term and -"my phrase") We don't roll up to the question anymore, if you searched for something that matched an answer, we'll show you the answer directly in search results The search per minute limit is effectively gone, it'll block a bot, but no one else should hit it... We'll be monitoring performance though infavorites:mine is back, with infavorites:12345 (any user id) added   What needs work:   What you tell us is broken... Do your worst.   Testing, not yet final:   New range support, here are some examples:   answers:1..1 (exactly one answer) answers:10..20 (10 to 20 answers) created:2008..2009 (created between Jan 1st, 2008 and Dec 31, 2009) created:2010-04..2010-05 (created between April 1st, 2010 and May 31st, 2010) created:2011-01-05..2011-01-06 (to be clear: it goes to end-of-day) This range syntax applies to a new advanced operator: lastactive: and the other numerical ranges, views:, and score:  Additionally, the above syntax is a bit more flexible if you forget it exactly (e.g. score:20-30) in an effort to be intuitive as possible, give it a try - tell us what you think.    I'll try and improve the search as much as possible before it becomes default... At the very least we want it equivalent in relevance and functionality before the switch, but ideally much better. We won't switch until then.  Please give it a try, tell us what you think here, and we'll continually improve it over the holidays as time allows. Bear in mind you may get a search offline page during this test if a change we're making for results necessitates a reindex, and even that should only last about two minutes here on Meta&nbsp;Stack&nbsp;Overflow.  Give it your worst, compare results to the old search, tell us what's better and what's not. We look forward to the feedback.  Update The new search is now the default across the network - we'll be monitoring things over the next few days and would appreciate reports of any crazy behavior you see here.
115305
If I select the "Include execution plan" checkbox in the Data Explorer, the query fails:     SHOWPLAN permission denied in database 'StackOverflow'.     I see that  following maintenance. I don't know whether there was any recent maintenance. It's been several days since the data was updated and longer since an update was deployed, if that's related.
91098
We have an  and I noticed the badges are not loading in the election statistics like they should be. It just hangs forever loading badge information:    Unfortunately I blew off reporting this for a couple days figuring it would resolve itself, but it doesn't seem to be a temporary problem.
58697
The alignment of items in the block Questions that may already have your answer is weird. The first question score is shown before the question and subsequent question and scores doesn't match. Here is a screenshot:     Right now, I'm using Chrome Version 28.0.1500.95 m, but it looks the same on Internet Explorer. Reproduced on Firefox 22.0  Edit: Stack Overflow looks normal.
95836
I have a favourite canonical question for PDO problems,   It's been used many dozens of times, as the "linked" column on that question shows. In fact, there are so many entries that a "see more linked questions..." link appears.  However, the  page shows only three links, because the url: search pattern is ignoring links in comments.  This doesn't make sense. Can this be fixed?  Also, I notice the links in the comments are all in the   https://stackoverflow.com/q/3726505/   format, while the URL search filter on the "see more..." page, by default, looks for  https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3726505/*   if comments were included here, they would be ignored anyway. Shouldn't the pattern rather be  https://stackoverflow.com/q*/3726505/*    ?
88463
Search for ,        ,                        and you will see that "results found containing __" is just a little too close to the header. It's not like there isn't  to have it be a little lower, closer to "Search":          The UI has been updated since I took the above screenshots, and the text you search for is  (which fixes another design issue but not the one in this question):
70455
We have added JSON-LD structured data to our website, so Google knows information about our company (company name, url, logo, address, etc.). We worked from the template on Google's .  One thing I couldn't find an answer to is where exactly should this JSON-LD snippet be included on our website? Right now, I only have it on our home page. I didn't know if it would look bad to search engines to have the Organization markup on every single page. But is there any recommendation?  Should Organization markup about our company be included on every page or only on certain pages?
103399
I was trying to do a search for new questions using the advanced search tags such as is:question and intags:mine. This normally works well, but today it is not showing any questions newer than 2nd June. For example, try this link which should show all questions in my tags, ordered by newest first:  http://stackoverflow.com/search?tab=newest&amp;q=intags%3amine   Has some back-end script stopped running perhaps?  Edit:  Search appears to be out-of-date for all search type (not just advanced search) and across all SE sites.  Edit: after working fine for a while, the bug is back in July 30th 2014:
66596
I've been working on a site for a new company that is in the tactical gear/survival gear niche and have ran into a hitch with the keywords that Google ranks for the site.  Namely 4 of the top 5 keywords aren't content related at all, and are elements/functions of the site. The top 5 are as follows:   Tactical Cart Compare Wishlist Quick (from a quick-view function on the site)   My question is how the heck can I avoid this issue? Or CAN I avoid this issue?
97371
Posting a bug report on Stack Apps, I tried to link to its API docs:     {id}/comments   It was unsuccessful, and making the link explicit with [http://url.com][1] doesn't work either because the link doesn't show up. E.g., .
19579
I've inherited a site where I noticed that    there is an excessive use of Schema.org in all navigation elements pages describing products are marked as itemtype="http://schema.org/CreativeWork"   So I'm wondering if these tags are sending the wrong message and not truly optimized. I realize that the nav (1) is done in some themes, but I'm more worried about (2). Can it be a hit SEO-wise to mislabel pages instead of products?
18044
When I use , the results I get don't reflect recent activity. Sometimes the data I get back are two months out of date. What's wrong? This is intended to be a canonical reference for questions about SEDE not reflecting real-time results.
88587
I'm kind of wondering… why can't there be cached tag scores updated live (e.g. when one of my answers is upvoted), like there are for reputation? I'm not saying that there shouldn't be the script running nightly, but it would be nice to see my scores go up immediately when my posts are upvoted, as opposed to the excruciating wait for 4AM UTC.
42933
For years now I'm working frequently with some Salesforce developer documentations, e.g.:       The best and easiest way in my workflow to find stuff (in general) was to use some reasonable keywords on Google, like "apex map" oder "apex list" or "visualforce repeat" and so on. This worked very well!  I was used to get high quality deep links (at least within TOP 3) as results for searches like:   searching with Google for apex map class ==> TOP 1 was  searching with Google for visualfore apex repeat ==> TOP 1 was    Why I did this?  I did intentionally NOT use the buildin-search (inside the documentation provided by Salesforce), because the results were usually way worse than Google, it takes more keystrokes and clicks to use it and the way the resultset is displayed is simply very inconvenient (tiny listview, severe need of scrolling, painful handling) and before you can search you have to open the documentation itself (way slower than goolge showing results)  Issue:  Now a short time ago (can't say exactly when it started) searching on Google is not bringing the expected hits as stated above within the TOP 10 results. It looks to me, as if the documentation not longer indexed correctly or not index at all by the Google bot.  This situation is bad for learners and beginners. They should find the official documentation using the search engine the will most likely use.  Questions:   Any tips and tricks on tweaking my search terms in order to get back the expected results? I've tried already a lot of combinations (e.g. "salesforce visualforce apex:repeat" which really should bring  close to top 1) but the official documentation is pretty resistant against being found via Google.  Are there others with the same experience? Does someone know to whom at Salesforce and over which channels we could reach out and address this issue? (I have no premier support, and my questions to anything close to development will be shut down when I open a case)   What I checked so far  The URLs of the deep-content have not been changed (as it happened some time ago ). I could check this, because I've lots of deep-link-bookmarks collected - all of them working correctly with no redirect noticed. If the URLs had changed, it could be just a question of time the google bot needs to re-index the documentation again, but since the links are the same I'm expecting no improvement just by further waiting.  Workaround  As @JamesSullivan stated in his comment the search engine  is doing better than Google. I can confirm that searching for apex map class salesforce brings up the right match on TOP 1. But it feels slightly less powerful as Google felt before and I need to feed one or two keywords more to get such precise matches as I was used to.  Extra note  Google for apex map class salesforce (like duckduckgo above) brings at TOP 1 a poor match to the root  (not to the deep content) and it shows up in Japanese or Chinese for me by default. I think this might have been the link I'm after, but got crippled somehow... (but not sure)  Conclusion  I think only Salesforce can help.  It seems to me, that maybe the google bot is just no longer crawling the documentation - maybe because of a bad robots.txt or something similar, which might be easy for Salesforce to change back as it was a short while ago...
121913
There's a new popup helping you with searching, but one of the hints is wrong:    Searching for  will return answers as well as questions, and it's not the number of (up/down)votes which counts, it's the score. Better would be "posts with a score of 3 or higher" or "questions and answers with a score of 3 or higher".
95078
When I do a search in the software center this is what the results look like.    I can only see the text if I select one of them.  I tried changing themes but that didn't fix it.