I recently accidentialy visited SemanticOverflow.com.  Is this somehow associated with SO? Or what is the relationship there?
120796
I ran into this site:  But I can't find it on here:  Is it even an &quot;official&quot; Stack Exchange project?
113780
On the meta home page I noticed the  is listed as doing something, but cannot figure out what it is.  There is nothing on the  or its , but the recent activity is listed with the same timestamp.
58171
I've just read  (now deleted). What is the policy on putting affiliate tags into Amazon links on Stack Overflow? What about other affiliate links?
13542
On the  blog post, nearly all the images are broken. I assume this is because they are all hosted on stackoverflow.blog/wp-content/uploads/ rather than zgab33vy595fw5zq-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/, and they got destroyed in the removal of Blog Overflow. I looked around at a few other blog posts, and this post seems to be the only one having an issue.
120392
Is this a StackExchange site? It looks and seems to function the exact same, but seems to have its own user system, and doesn't contain links to all of the other SE sites at the bottom like all the ones I've seen do.  If this is not an "official" SE site is it acceptable for third party sites to "copy" the look &amp; feel of SE to this extent or is this site in violation of something?
10924
I'm using  and trying to switch from Web Applications to Stack Overflow.   I enter sta into "Switch sites" field, but search showing unrelated results first (3D Printing, 3D Printing Meta, Software Engineering ...):
76370
I wanted to look for some questions to answer, so I went to . It came up with some really weird tags, as seen in this image:        , , , , and  are the tags in which I have the most posts. I also have  that has the tags , , and .  When I clicked on |bug|reputation|achievements-dialog|:        After I gave myself a favorite tag it acted as normal filtering the unanswered questions by that tag.
8815
As a result of  myself, the need arose to track other Stack Overflow-based research. The following is an attempt to list the academic papers mentioning Stack Overflow/Exchange or using Stack Exchange data. This also includes the works mentioned in  that started the trend, as well as two other questions on meta, , and . If you know of papers that are not listed, please edit the answer directly. I realised it might be useful to have all the BibTeX entries in a single file, so I started .
76585
I almost never even think about synonymization. Why? Maybe because the link is almost hidden on the bottom of the :  Can we please make that feature more prominent? Maybe put it on the review page. I am sure there are some  waiting to be voted on. Let's get the tag jungle organized.
93957
I get Stack Overflow (which I'm guessing was the first site?) and Super User, Code Review, and the other sibling site names make sense to me.  But I've never heard of a stack exchange before.  Is a stack exchange a real thing, or is this site's name a combination of Stack Overflow and an exchange of ideas?
50230
SO has helped me so much in times of need. It is crazy - sometimes I am having a huge issue with a program I'm working on at school or work, and I post it on SO and the answers come quickly and easily. Lots of time it's a typo, while others it's a deep misunderstanding of mine. I wonder how I can fit in here at Stack Overflow. How I can contribute. In fact, I feel such a “beginner”, I don't even know where to look half the time. But I see there is now a place for /Programmers/ which leads me to wonder if there can be a site for beginners - and strictly beginners. Beginners post in Stack Overflow, and only beginners can post answers. Meaning, you must ask a question in the beginners forum in order to answer one. Or something, I'm not sure, I just want a place to connect with others who are just starting out how to learn about programming, and want to get the chance to answer other beginner questions so I can learn more (you learn 40% of what you do and 90% of what you teach). What do you all think about this?
61879
The  still uses the term Stack Exchange, Inc. However, I believe that the name is now Stack Overflow, Inc. , so I believe that should be changed to that. It is weird to have the wrong name in a legal document.   Yes, I actually read the Terms of Service. You should also do that.
78300
I didn't know the comments were 'disposable' as I thought they were also contributions covered by the CC-by-sa license. What are their status??  See comment by @joran there
58529
Why does it say "Stack Overflow" instead of the site name?
1839
It's    that posting links to your own website is ok, but should there be a line drawn? There were several spam flags today for 's recent posts, presumably because they all link to his website. Initially I disagreed because his answers seem for the most part relevant to the question, but then I looked into it more and realized there's three things that set this apart from most of the related cases that have come up:   This isn't an occasional thing -- he's posted  in the last year This isn't a random blog he writes for a fun, it's a for-profit company he  and makes money promoting I'm not willing to go through all 412, but from the sample I checked, he generally doesn't mention that the products he's recommending are his own. The site is linked from his profile, but most people aren't going to check that   Is all this considered acceptable use, or are the spam flags accurate?
32404
I've used chatrooms for Stack Overflow earlier. Is it still available? When I go to  I get the message above. It's happening for a few weeks or more.
88275
So, I noticed last week that . Well, it turns out that the wording is actually completely incorrect.  noticed that all of the users on the front page are the OPs of the questions listed there. This area is the issue:  It reads  Top Network Users These users asked or provided top answers for the posts on this page  I found that confusing, so I proposed this wording (provided by ):  Top Network Users These users provided the top questions and answers on this page  But, again, the users listed there are the ones who asked the questions; none answered them:  (click for larger image) Since all of the &quot;Top Network Users&quot; are the askers, it should be something like this:  Top Network Users These users asked the questions listed on this page  Either that, or answerers of those questions should be included along with the askers.