When looking at a suggested edit that only changed the title, but not the body of the question, the review page will always show the current body and not what the body has been at the time of that edit.  For example  only changed the title. As I wasn’t happy with what was done, I went to the question, and , changing both the title and the question body. However, when you look at the suggested edit, you can see the body I was editing in after the suggested edit. So the suggest edit does not really reflect the actually made changes.
8294
Yesterday I was pointed at some rejected suggested edits. Some of the corrections were valid, so I edited the posts accordingly, while making several further edits. Looking at the suggested edits now however, it seems that for those posts where only changes to the title were originally suggested, the post mortem suggested edit view now incorporates the body of the latest revision. (Or at least it appears like that to me)  Take for example . If you take a look at  of that post, you will see my later edits. The edited body seems to have been incorporated in the suggested edit view. For edits where originally changes to the body were suggested, there is no such confusion.   Why does this matter? In the case of some post mortem discussions or explanations it might help to see the actual situation as it was when the edit was suggested. Especially in the case of edits that might be considered too minor.   So have I stumbled upon a bug here?
102990
The below bug doesn't always happen, but does most of the time. Steps to reproduce:  Go to any review queue Post a comment Edit the comment Click Save Edits  Result:  Obviously the red box above is the annoying bug...  :-)
88040
I was testing some behavior with a low rep account, and when I was trying to suggest a few edits, I was greeted with the following message when trying to submit an edit:    Huh?!?!?!  It was a suggested edit, so why are you telling me it needs to be a suggested edit?  Turns out it was a suggested edit conflict.  The post in question had an existing suggested edit by the time I tried to submit mine.  For brand new users, this is certainly not ideal behavior as it is only confusing to them.  Can this message be changed to something more descriptive?  Or at least less confusing?  I would suggest     This edit cannot be submitted as there is a pending suggested edit on this post.     Note there is a question that looks similar, but is essentially different:  This is a feature request asking that the language be changed, while the other is a support question asking, basically, what it means.
88745
When I'm looking down the front page on , I often wish I could tell at a glance what happened to the question to bump it there. Sometimes it is obvious from looking at the number of answers, other times you have to follow a link to find out if it has been edited or if an answer has been added or updated.  I'm guessing this is just as applicable on other SE sites - this is the kind of thing I'm suggesting:    A couple of suggestions from the comments that might be good:   To reduce clutter the word 'ago' could be removed at the same time. The new text could be visible only to established users - ie users who are likely to be reviewing/editing and would benefit from seeing at a glance what kind of change has occurred.
61866
There is a question on one of the SE sites that had a pending suggested edit: trust me, the way the original question was, it was needed. Before I even thought to approve the edit, I went to close it as a duplicate (as it was), but the suggested edit was still there.  If the question is being closed anyways (as a duplicate or otherwise) do I reject or approve the suggested edit? What is the proper etiquette?
34497
I just made some minor edits to the text of .  I didn't edit the tags at all.  When I completed my edits, my edit showed as:    Now, I think those tags were present before I started my edit, and so were probably slipped in by the OP in their edit grace window.  I have no problem with that tagging, but I don't like seeing edits attributed to me that I didn't make.  So, what the heck?
118283
While editing  to include a better title, I noticed that the body of the text had a stray lowercase i, and went to change it.  The error came back that my edit was too short (less than 6 characters). I was momentarily confused, because the title was all-new and plenty long, and then figured out it meant in the body. Could/should we either count title changes toward the minimum character change count or just mention that the error refers to the body of the question?
122486
I was reviewing a  and decided that while the edit was incorrect, there were things to improve about the post. So I clicked “Improve” and set about my business. When I tried to submit my edit, I got the following error message, telling me that the post had been edited in the meantime by the suggester:  User already edited the body of this post; your edit must be more substantive to override the current edit.  When I tried later on a tag wiki, I got the altogether unhelpful indication that “an error has occurred”, and again no way to do anything but cancel and lose my work. But refreshing the page brought me to the suggested edit page, showing the suggested edit as approved, with no trace of my editing. (Fortunately I'd saved my text on the side!) With a , I was marked as having reviewed the suggestion, with the indication “edit” — but there was otherwise no trace of my alleged edit. So, if you improve a suggested edit and it gets approved in the meantime, you get into a situation where  there is no link to the post; if you go back, you get to what you were doing before and lose your edit; if you reload the page as instructed, you lose your edit.  The bug here is that unless you take extra precautions such as copy-pasting your edit into an external editor, you will lose your work. Expected behavior Unlike normal edit conflicts, an edit made to a suggested edit is guaranteed to be a derivative of the suggested edit - so if that edit was approved and then an &quot;improved&quot; version is submitted, that &quot;improvement&quot; edit should be applied to the post (the helpful status indicated by the checkbox shouldn't affect anything though). When two different reviewers both opt to improve a suggested edit, a conflict is unavoidable - this should be resolved based on the size of the edit, as is the normal behavior.
106245
Now we have a nice side-by-side diff in the 'suggested edits' review pages, and as an , could something similar be made available as an option when editing a post?  It wouldn't need to be interactive - a button to get the side-by-side diff of the current state of your edit, versus the original would do.  This would be useful when shuffling lots of whitespace around - a final check that you haven't broken some embedded code.  A workaround at the moment is to submit the edit, then check the side-by-side view in the edit history.
96321
I found some questions that are not very well-worded, and I want to clarify them. So, I went, and edited one of the questions.  As I have poor short-term memory, after editing, I wondered what I have edited.  I cannot find any easy way to see the original version, or a diff.  Of course, I could just click "Back" button to see the question, but I risk losing my edit (in case I just happen to navigate away and lost the "Next" button.) It is inconvenient too. I wish I could make a comparison to ensure the original meaning remains unchanged.  Did I miss anything? I looked around and found , but I cannot just submit the (suggested) edit, which defeats the point that I want to review my edit before submitting/suggesting.  It shows the original question when editing answers, but not editing questions themselves.    In short, may the edit question page shows the original, or a link to it? (I don't find it, I do not have edit privilege if that matters.)  This is what I have, can anyone point out how to access the original question?
943
It often occurs to me to add an edit summary to a question-edit immediately after submitting the edit, especially if the changes aren't obvious (formatting etc.). So I:   Click "edit" again. Fill in the summary Click on "Save Edits".   The 'edit' (no actual change has been made to the title/body/tags)  is accepted, but the summary doesn't show up, i.e. it is silently rejected.   I don't think it should work this way because the summary has been added by the original editor within the original edit's edit-window. In fact if I remember correctly, it to used to work as expected earlier; so perhaps this is a recent change.
10562
When answers are posted within a question's initial grace period, it is possible that further edits could completely change the question (see ""), and render those first few answers incorrect.   Worse yet, nobody is notified that there was a change to the question, except those that are sitting on the page and notice the edit bar pop in. And of those, only those bothered enough to open it in a new window to compare the differences, will see how much was changed.   After the grace period is up, nobody will be able to consolidate why the first few answers actually answered a different question. And the answerers won't know unless someone comments or down-votes (and in the latter case, without context, they still might have trouble understanding, unless they memorized the question's initial state).  Jon Skeet stated it pretty well in  on :     I'd like this to apply to the question, as well as answers. Sometimes I (or others) have added perfectly good answers, but then the question has been changed within the grace period, making answers look foolish without any indication of what's happened.   So this time, my proposal is quite simple:     Once an answer is posted to a question within the initial grace period, a new grace period should start, and the current state of the question should be saved as the first revision. Further edits within the next 5 minutes will be aggregated into a new, second revision.   This will only noticeably affect questions where answers are posted within the grace period and the author of the question makes edits within 5 minutes of the first answer. (Effectively, it would treat it as if a different user made an edit within the author's grace period.) All other scenarios will continue to behave as they do today.  This feature request comes close:    However, the answer suggests a simple change to the wording or a pencil icon (like we see with edited comments), without adding a revision that can be viewed and compared. I don't think this is enough - in some cases it's going to be important to know what changed, not just when.
10242
In the First Posts review queue, it's possible to click edit to edit the post, then to immediately click Save Edits without having actually modified anything. If we do so, the button I'm Done becomes available even if we didn't actually do anything.  It's not really important, but it shouldn't be possible to click I'm Done unless we actually did something relevant.
107265
I've just been presented with a suggested edit to an  - but the edit was proposed by the OP himself, in which he clarified that the answer was right, but with a few tweaks/revisions which he wanted to communicate to viewers. He didn't amend the answer, but appended clearly-labelled comment and code.  I hovered over the accept button, but wanted to check and couldn't find any specific guidance.  In the meantime, ironically, the suggested edit has been rejected by another user...  Is there any accepted guidance for OP comments in an accepted answer? Or is it purely down to judgement?   In my opinion, what was being proposed as an edit was valuable, but I questioned whether it was the right place for such an edit.
106181
I've seen this a few times now but so far I skipped such suggested edits, because I'm unsure what to do.  Right now in the "Suggested Edits" queue, there are a bunch of questions where the tags  and  are replaced by . These are all suggested by the same user.  Assuming that the questions themselves don't require improvements, how should I review these suggested edits?
46248
When reviewing suggested edits, I ran across . It took a post originally in French and Google Translated it to English. I approved it, as it gave the post a chance to survive, and it properly attributed that the post had been translated. It appears that two others did the same.  But should have I? It probably falls under a 'radical change', right?
26337
I was in the first posts review queue and chanced on a post with a suggested edit. (Note: I have enough reputation to review suggested edits.) I clicked on “edit (1)” and was taken into the suggested edits queue. When I approved the suggested edit, I was taken to the next suggested edit, and so on until there were no more suggestions (“There are no items for you to review.”, still in the suggested edits queue). In this situation, I think it would make more sense if I was brought back to that post I was working on in the first posts queue, as soon as I acted on its suggested edit. Alternatively, the suggested edit should be shown in the same kind of pop-up as on a question thread page. The same goes for other queues (late answers, low quality, etc.).