Sometimes when I feel that a "late answer" needs editing, there's already a suggested edit over there. But approving it (of course after inspection) doesn't enable the "I'm Done" action. On top of that, it switches me to "Review Suggested Edits".  Though I come back to that page, even refreshing it doesn't work.  Shouldn't this be changed?
26337
I was in the first posts review queue and chanced on a post with a suggested edit. (Note: I have enough reputation to review suggested edits.) I clicked on “edit (1)” and was taken into the suggested edits queue. When I approved the suggested edit, I was taken to the next suggested edit, and so on until there were no more suggestions (“There are no items for you to review.”, still in the suggested edits queue). In this situation, I think it would make more sense if I was brought back to that post I was working on in the first posts queue, as soon as I acted on its suggested edit. Alternatively, the suggested edit should be shown in the same kind of pop-up as on a question thread page. The same goes for other queues (late answers, low quality, etc.).
60584
In the 10 k tools,  is described as if I had approved it:    However, the review item itself (correctly) displays that I rejected this edit:    Going by   , this should be fixed, but it isn’t.  This could be solved by replacing approved by to reviewed by in the list or making an explicit list, who approved and rejected an edit (which is probably more complicated).
63643
I've had the ability to review suggested edits for a while now, however I don't often do so because the list is usually full of questions about languages and technologies I'm not familiar with or not interested in, and can sometimes be hundreds of questions long.  I would like to help out more, but most of my rep has been gained by questions within a specific technology, so I only feel comfortable reviewing edits within that tag.   Can you allow us to filter suggested edits by tag?  Edit:   Actually, can you let us filter the entire Review section by tag, and not just Suggested Edits?  I would find it much more interesting to review questions in tags I'm familiar with and can  understand the question content of, and it would give me a bit of pride to help maintain "my" section of SO.
13610
In a certain case, the user will be asked to confirm if he/she wishes to leave the page, due to editing a post, even when he/she has stopped editing.  To reproduce:   Start editing a post (I've only experienced this with a question) Another user finishes editing the post before you and the message "This post has been edited" appears Clicking on the message bar will take you out of editing mode and will show you the updated post from the other user's edits Trying to navigate away from the page will then ask for your confirmation
48622
How was an anonymous user able to suggest ? (Warning: it has an offensive edit summary, which has been edited out in the screenshot below.) It doesn't seem to change anything, not even when viewing the Markdown source:    IIRC, if you suggest an edit and then immediately edit it again, but if the new edit doesn't meet the 6 character minimum it won't be accepted by the system. I just tried (while logged out) to retag this question and undo that in the grace period, but I get a message , as it should.
93134
I just got a review audit where the "late answer" was a duplicate of the accepted answer, but flagging it on that basis failed the review. That seems like a bug to me.  Question here:   I found that by clicking the question to view the entire Q&amp;A, and noticed that the copy was from a generic "user12345" account (probably with 1 rep as well) and the original from a real-looking account. Viewing the whole Q&amp;A is often useful when reviewing, especially late answers (which are often repeats of earlier points, disagreements with those, or random addendums better submitted as edits). I looked at the duplicate and thought "weird, rep harvesting maybe?" so I clicked "needs moderator attention" and wrote "copy and paste of accepted answer". FAIL!  I think that this review type can't ever work, because to avoid the problem I found you'd need to make up whole new "late answers" which by definition the review bot can't know anything useful about. Either that or to pass you'd just need to take any action at all, including upvoting the original of the duplicated answer. Which I didn't do, BTW, because I had no idea or opinion about the question or answer.  (this is not a duplicate of "What are review tests", it predates that and focuses on a particular defect within the process. See the comments below).
2048
I think many of us already aware, still I wanted to let you know that First Post and Late Answers review posts are generated on specific time interval. When time comes for post generation I follow some tricks   Click and till a Post appears for review Then right-click and select Open in new tab 5-8 time. Then in every page follow the below steps   Open the Question of post appeared in review in New tab If Page/Question not exists then simply downvote since post was deleted because of -ve response. Else if page exists then   Check the review post's Net Reputation If reputation is -ve then simply downvote the post came in review Else one may select No Action needed.    This way if in any case a post comes for "Are you paying attention" can be handled easily.  I think if a post comes in review should not allow to view post.
44116
I recall :    It was one that I knew could use a bit more spit and polish, but I didn't have the inclination or energy to edit it myself, so I skipped it.  I wander my way over to  (10K only), and look at the listing...    ...so, when did I approve this again? I skipped the question; that doesn't mean I gave my tacit approval, does it?  Seems like the dashboard needs to agree with the suggested edits view.
64117
For example,  edit was proposed to an answer to my question. The bug is I see the checkmark when I go to this edit (I can't click checkmark however).
47207
The day before yesterday I reviewed  in  (I have > 2K rep there).  I clicked on “Improve Edit”, made some more changes, and saved (submitted) them.  All the changes were made (both the ones “suggested” by  and mine), and  shows two revisions — #5, by Chema, and #6, by me — made at the exact same time.   The issue is that revision #5 is shown as having been reviewed by the Community user, with no indication that I did an Improve Edit:          unlike the normal way it looks when I improve an edit:         Also, I looked at my editing stats, and they were the same before and after:        [Scott has approved 1267 edit suggestions and rejected 750 edit suggestions and improved 289 edit suggestions] Normally the third number (improved ___ edit suggestions) would go up by one. Also, it does not appear in my Review history ( → “Activity” → “all actions” → “reviews”) or .   This happens on a recurring, but occasional (irregular, irreproducible), basis.  For example, see , , and .  I did “Reject and Edit” on all three, but I didn’t “get credit” for .
109351
I just edited  that contained some code that was overall neat and correct, but wouldn't compile. I made it compile clean and (in my opinion) more readable.  The edit got rejected as too minor, because during my edit the OP made the code compile-clean in the grace period and thus in the diff that shows up to the reviewers, only the parts making the code more readable showed up. Such an edit is a too minor one, without question.  In my opinion there are two possibilities to solve this kind of "conflict":   When user A has edited a post and user B (>2k rep, or original author) has edited that post in the meantime user A gets a message that the post has changed and is asked to revise that edit based on the changes made in the meantime. The easier one: Don't allow edit suggestions in the grace period.   I don't care about the missing reputation I would have gotten if the suggestion had been approved. I just don't like my suggestions being reviewed on a false basis - because the diff that is displayed to the approvers does not display the correct edit.  Doing a quick search here on meta I found some questions maybe related to this problem - none of them however addresses the problem of the review based on incorrect diffs:
2409
It's not uncommon to find new users editing or commenting on their questions with something along the lines of "Update: I solved it by Xing the Y with Z" instead of posting their solution as a self-answer. This is an ongoing issue that I think isn't helped by the 8-hour delay for new users (&lt;100 rep) between posting a question and self-answering.  This delay has been in place , though not having encountered it personally, I only learned of it this morning. The message shown to new users attempting an early self-answer is:     Oops! Your answer couldn't be submitted because: Users with less than 100 reputation can't answer their own question for 8 hours after asking. You may self-answer in [ N ]  hours. Until then please use comments, or edit your question instead.   Emphasis mine. So, what action is this message specifically recommending? Before you answer, make sure you've got your "new user" hat on, because only new users are seeing this message at all. And when they see this message, it's because they clicked the "answer" button, which - despite its frequent misuse - suggests that they may actually be trying to answer the question. So it should come as no surprise when a well-intentioned new user :     The error message from Stack Exchange told me to try just editing my question to include my answer...   The purpose of the feature is explained (or intuited) at greater length in , which notably includes the following:     If you want to respond to another user's answer in order to to ask for clarification or additional help, you should leave a comment (new users can always comment on their own questions). If someone asks you for additional information, you should edit your question to include that information.   That's a good explanation. It's clear, brief and identifies specific uses of comments and edits. If prompt self-answering is a trigger for the system to step in, apply the brakes and deliver some important knowledge and if we've identified this as an opportunity to educate new users, that's the type of message they need to see - not something akin to:     Oops! You couldn't drive that nail because: Users who have built fewer than 10 birdhouses can't use the hammer for 8 hours after opening their Acme Birdhouse kit. You may drive a nail in [ N ] hours. Until then please use the screwdriver or chisel instead.   So here I am, just back from the hardware store with a bag full of nails, and that screwdriver looks pretty sturdy...  I'm not the first to point this out as potentially confusing; Benjamin Gruenbaum said much the same thing in a nice answer last year to :     A user reading this might understand "You should edit your question instead of posting a self-answer". I think a better phrasing is needed.   Well, Benjamin, I agree - so here's a feature request. Let's revise this message so that it doesn't mislead new users into thinking that self-answers are ever appropriate to leave as comments or edits to the OP.
110184
Is there a place or an option to see my own suggested edits with their review status (accepted or declined) in form of a list or a graph?  I'd like it to be more like a list of my flags where there is a visible thing that says [active] or the reason why it was declined. It'd make it much easier to see if and where I have gone wrong.
83887
Have a look at . It was showing "This question was edited after it was closed" as a reason to reopen. But  was not edited after it was closed.   The last edit was on Oct 26 '08 at 21:15.        And it was closed on Nov 28 '11 at 22:44    Also there is no revision in the review page:        Actually it was in the queue because someone voted to reopen. I think this happens due to   See some examples from Meta review queue:
113272
The times that a suggested edit was suggested and the post was posted don't line up in the suggested edit view.        I've observed this behaviour on both MSO and SO, but can't see it in any other queues.  I'm using Chrome 27.0.1453.110 m on Windows 7 if it's relevant.
4909
I was reviewing on , and I faced a weird thing. I can review "Close Votes", "Low Quality Posts", and "Suggested Edits" if I reached my daily vote limit, but I can't for "First Posts" and "Late Answers". Why?    If they just deserve an upvote/downvote then they should not include in the review system. But if we can improve them through leaving comments and by editing the posts then why can't we access them?
103315
I've often seen an edit (1) link next to post with a suggested edit, when hovered:       1 edit to this post is pending, please review it     Is it possible for a post to have more than one edits pending for review on it? I remember in the past, the number stated how many people voted on it.    After some testing, turns out it can't, so here's the findings:   A post may only ever have one suggested edit at a time. When a post with a pending edit gets viewed by a low-rep user, the edit link is grayed out. The number used to mean "Total number of edit reviews this post had" (Basically, number of votes to approve + number of votes to reject).   For those reasons, the suggested edit will always show 1 (and by that implying that there could be more).  Are there plans of making a single post accept multiple suggest edits? Why was this changed in the first place?