This is the second time it's happening and the first time it went away by itself, so this time I thought that it was a matter of rebooting my system, or maybe an issue with the default PDF viewer. None of those fixed it, so I'm asking here not only because someone might know the solution but also because it sets a precedent.  Also, my Tex Live is up to date. Switching between XeLaTeX and pdflatex yields no different results.   Basically applying a shading/path fading to any given shape (which one seems to be irrelevant), the result will always be a rectangle on the bottom of the shaded shape filled with the top colour. Here's an example:        And here's the code:  \documentclass[tikz]{standalone}     \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}  \shade[bottom color=blue!50!black, top color=cyan!50] (-1,-1) rectangle (1,1);  \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   What is wrong with it?  Edit: Now pdflatex gives the expected result, but XeLaTeX still shows the problem. Also, here is the result of \listfiles   *File List* standalone.cls    2012/09/15 v1.1b Class to compile TeX sub-files standalone ifluatex.sty    2010/03/01 v1.3 Provides the ifluatex switch (HO)    ifpdf.sty    2011/01/30 v2.3 Provides the ifpdf switch (HO)  ifxetex.sty    2010/09/12 v0.6 Provides ifxetex conditional  xkeyval.sty    2014/12/03 v2.7a package option processing (HA)  xkeyval.tex    2014/12/03 v2.7a key=value parser (HA) standalone.cfg    2012/09/15 v1.1b Default configuration file for 'standalone'  class  article.cls    2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class   size10.clo    2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX file (size option)     tikz.sty    2013/12/13 v3.0.0 (rcs-revision 1.142)      pgf.sty    2013/12/18 v3.0.0 (rcs-revision 1.14)   pgfrcs.sty    2013/12/20 v3.0.0 (rcs-revision 1.28) everyshi.sty    2001/05/15 v3.00 EveryShipout Package (MS)   pgfrcs.code.tex  pgfcore.sty    2010/04/11 v3.0.0 (rcs-revision 1.7) graphicx.sty    2014/10/28 v1.0g Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR) graphics.sty    2014/10/28 v1.0p Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)     trig.sty    1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC) graphics.cfg    2010/04/23 v1.9 graphics configuration of TeX Live    xetex.def    2015/03/25 v4.04 LaTeX color/graphics driver for XeTeX (TeX Liv e/RRM/JK)   pgfsys.sty    2013/11/30 v3.0.0 (rcs-revision 1.47)   pgfsys.code.tex pgfsyssoftpath.code.tex    2013/09/09  (rcs-revision 1.9) pgfsysprotocol.code.tex    2006/10/16  (rcs-revision 1.4)   xcolor.sty    2007/01/21 v2.11 LaTeX color extensions (UK)    color.cfg    2007/01/18 v1.5 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive  pgfcore.code.tex pgfcomp-version-0-65.sty    2007/07/03 v3.0.0 (rcs-revision 1.7) pgfcomp-version-1-18.sty    2007/07/23 v3.0.0 (rcs-revision 1.1)   pgffor.sty    2013/12/13 v3.0.0 (rcs-revision 1.25)  pgfkeys.sty      pgfkeys.code.tex  pgfmath.sty      pgfmath.code.tex   pgffor.code.tex     tikz.code.tex
84306
I would like to use shadings in my TikZ graphics together with the standalone package and XeLaTeX, but for some reason it is broken if I try with the new 3.0.0 release (). Any other combination I tried works for me (use for example article class/pdflatex/lualatex/TikZ 2.10). (I'm using a fully updated TeX Live 2013.) MWE \documentclass{standalone} %\documentclass{article} % would work  \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{shadings}  \begin{document} \tikz \draw[top color=red] (0,0) rectangle (2,1); \end{document}  Output  Expected Output  Question How can I avoid the problem and which package/class is causing it?
1242
Recently I switched from pdflatex to xelatex to be able to use OpenType fonts. I like to use variables highlighted using \mathcal for specific variables, while I used to use \mathscr-typeset variables for matrices. But when I compile with XeLaTeX they look exaclty the same.  Old code  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \begin{document} $\mathcal{C} = \mathscr{C}$ \end{document}   Output        New code  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{unicode-math} \begin{document} $\mathcal{C} = \mathscr{C}$ \end{document}   Output        Broken code  I tried to get back the glyphs from mathrsfs, but it failed this way.  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{unicode-math} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \begin{document} $\mathcal{C} = \mathscr{C}$ \end{document}   Output        Question: How can I get back the behaviour? In principle I'd like to have the old \mathcal letters from the pdflatex-version of Computer/Latin Modern.    Alternate solutions (Addendum 2016/05/11)
36649
I'm trying to plot an image file in a pdfplots axis. This is a minimal example (the files fig2a.eps and fig2a.png both contain the image that should be plotted):   \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{tikz,pgfplots} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis} \addplot graphics[xmin=-0.15, xmax=0.15, ymin=0.0, ymax=0.2] {fig2a}; \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   When compiling with pdflatex, I get exactly what I want. With latex (producing a dvi file), the tick labels are all on top of each other inside the image, so something goes wrong with the positioning.  I suppose version information is useful in this case -- from the output to the screen I have this when running both latex and pdflatex:  This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012)   What am I doing wrong?
43381
I am generating a pdf using pdflatex from the same latex file on three different computers. The pdf is generated without any warnings on all three computers and it looks almost identical. The one difference is that on my work computer, vector fonts are used while on the other two computers, the pdf has bitmap fonts.  All three machines are running a 13.04 Kubuntu and I'm using the latex packages from the distribution. On all three I simply use the default setting of Kile to generate the pdf.  Clearly there must be some difference in how latex is setup on these machines. It's possible that I installed some additional packages on my work computer, but I am not sure where to look.  So my question is, why does the same source result in two different PDFs? How do I make the other two computers also use vector fonts, and avoid the bitmap fonts, without modifying the latex source?
91499
Update: Thanks to the comments below. Using the link by Michal below, it appears this is a known bug but the fix was not in 2014. Doing the change as pointed out in the link below, seems to have fixed the problem  &gt;diff pgfsys-tex4ht.def pgfsys-tex4ht.def_ORIGINAL  89c89 &lt; \def\pgfsys@svg@newline{{?nl}} --- &gt; \def\pgfsys@svg@newline{\Hnewline}   The above file is in   /usr/local/texlive/2014/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/systemlayer   I no longer get the error, and I get the same outout as tex4ht on texlive 2013  Original question  I just installed fresh linux on virtual machine. Installed new texlive 2014.   Download the .gz ﬁle from     install-tl-unx.tar.gz 16-Jun-2014 18:26  3.2M   Then extract   gunzip install-tl-unx.tar.gz  tar -xvf install-tl-unx.tar   Then move to the folder created from the above and do   sudo ./install-tl   Tried one of my test files and it failed. Same file works ok on texlive 2013 (different virtual machine, so no interactions between installation).  This file fails to build with tex4ht only. Builds ok with pdflatex. I would have expected it to work out of the box, since tex4ht is part of texlive.  \documentclass{article} \ifdefined\HCode \def\pgfsysdriver{pgfsys-tex4ht.def} \fi \usepackage{tikz,graphicx} % \usetikzlibrary{trees} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}  \node {root}    child {node {$\frac{a}{b}$}}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   Using texlive 2014:  &gt;latex --version pdfTeX 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.15 (TeX Live 2014) kpathsea version 6.2.0  htlatex foo.tex   gives  (/usr/local/texlive/2014/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/modules/pgfmoduleplot.code. tex) (/usr/local/texlive/2014/texmf-dist/tex/latex/pgf/compatibility/pgfcomp-version -0-65.sty ! Undefined control sequence. \pgfsys@svg@newline -&gt;\Hnewline   l.190   \pgfusepathqfill}  ?    on the texlive 2013 PC   &gt;latex --version pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013) kpathsea version 6.1.1   The same command runs with no problem and no errors and HTML is generated with image on it ok.  Has something changed with tex4ht and the pgfsys-tex4ht.def in texlive 2014?
42335
issue also opened at     When I compile this MWE latex file in texstudio, on windows, using MikTex, then view the result using texstudio internal PDF viewer, it shows white streak lines going over the image. These lines are not in the original image.  Also these lines do not show up when I view the compiled PDF file using external PDF reader such as adobe.   Why is that?  The image is also a PDF file. Is it possible to resolve it? It is not a big issue really, since this seems to be just an artifact of texstudio pdf viewer itself, but thought to ask if there is an option to fix this.  Here is MWE  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{graphicx} \begin{document} This is my image, as PDF file, imported using includegraphics  \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{image}     \end{document}   I put the file image.pdf is on my web page   This is how the compiled PDF looks like inside texstudio PDF viewer    This is how the PDF looks like inside adobe PRO pdf reader    Notice the white lines that show up in texstudio. This is pdfinfo on the image file  pdfinfo image.pdf   Creator:        Wolfram Mathematica 11.2.0.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (September 10, 2017) Student Edition - Personal Use Only Producer:        CreationDate:   Sat Mar  3 16:13:39 2018 ModDate:        Sat Mar  3 16:13:39 2018 Tagged:         no UserProperties: no Suspects:       no Form:           none JavaScript:     no Pages:          1 Encrypted:      no Page size:      470 x 367 pts Page rot:       0 File size:      99049 bytes Optimized:      no PDF version:    1.5   I am using   TeXstudio 2.12.6 (hg 6632:7777b2b8a906) Using Qt Version 5.9.1, compiled with Qt 5.9.1 R   Windows 7.
3237
With a fresh installation of TeX Live (updated just before writing this post), circles in axis environments are distorted. Consider the following MWE:  \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pgfplots} \pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}  \begin{document}  \begin{tikzpicture} \begin{axis}[   ymin=-3, ymax=3,   xmin=-3, xmax=3 ]  \draw (1,0) circle [radius=1.5]; \fill (1,0) circle [radius=1];  \end{axis} \end{tikzpicture}  \end{document}   The output looks like this:   Obviously, the circles aren't even circles. I haven't encountered this problem before. Did I do anything wrong while setting up my new system?  EDIT: It's not an issue of using axis equal or not since the axes are scaled more or less equally already. Instead, the circles appear as rotated ellipses that are strongly stretched out in one dimension.  EDIT 2: Here's the output of \listfiles:  article.cls    2019/12/20 v1.4l Standard LaTeX document class   size10.clo    2019/12/20 v1.4l Standard LaTeX file (size option) pgfplots.sty    2018/03/28 v1.16 Data Visualization (1.16) graphicx.sty    2019/11/30 v1.2a Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)   keyval.sty    2014/10/28 v1.15 key=value parser (DPC) graphics.sty    2019/11/30 v1.4a Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)     trig.sty    2016/01/03 v1.10 sin cos tan (DPC) graphics.cfg    2016/06/04 v1.11 sample graphics configuration   pdftex.def    2018/01/08 v1.0l Graphics/color driver for pdftex     tikz.sty    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b)      pgf.sty    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b)   pgfrcs.sty    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b) everyshi.sty    2001/05/15 v3.00 EveryShipout Package (MS) pgfrcs.code.tex  pgfcore.sty    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b)   pgfsys.sty    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b) pgfsys.code.tex pgfsyssoftpath.code.tex    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b) pgfsysprotocol.code.tex    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b)   xcolor.sty    2016/05/11 v2.12 LaTeX color extensions (UK)    color.cfg    2016/01/02 v1.6 sample color configuration pgfcore.code.tex pgfcomp-version-0-65.sty    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b) pgfcomp-version-1-18.sty    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b)   pgffor.sty    2020/01/08 v3.1.5b (3.1.5b)  pgfkeys.sty pgfkeys.code.tex  pgfmath.sty     pgfmath.code.tex pgffor.code.tex tikz.code.tex l3backend-pdfmode.def    2020-02-03 L3 backend support: PDF mode supp-pdf.mkii epstopdf-base.sty    2020-01-24 v2.11 Base part for package epstopdf epstopdf-sys.cfg    2010/07/13 v1.3 Configuration of (r)epstopdf for TeX Live
26489
I'm using pdflatex, and use \includegraphics to include content of figures from PDF. PDF are exported from InkScape.  \begin{figure} [!h]     \centering     \includegraphics[height=3cm]{fig/SUSAN.pdf} \end{figure}   Included PDF or source SVG has same colors. Green has always RGB value (0, 255, 0). Problem occurs when I include this files from LaTeX. In output PDF on some pages colorspace is darker. Even same image on other page has different colourity.  My PDF  . As you can see on page 7 (11 in PDF) USAN areas are bright green, but then on page 5 (9 in PDF) are green points on corners more darker.
2442
I'm using the xcolor package to colour the top row in a table. This is displayed properly using PDF viewers such as Preview or Skim (Mac). But using Adobe Reader 10.1.3 (either Windows or Mac) doesn't display the table line properly.   But removing the colouring for the table fixes it. Here is the example that works as expected:  \begin{table} \caption{Table showing Feature 5's Functional Tests} \hspace*{-0.5in} \begin{tabular}[h!]{|p{0.6cm}|p{4cm}|p{5cm}|p{4cm}|p{1.5cm}|} \hline {\bf Test ID } &amp; {\bf Task } &amp; {\bf Expected} &amp; {\bf Actual} &amp; {\bf Outcome} \\ \hline    5.1 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.2 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.3 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.4 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline \end{tabular}  \end{table}   And here is the example with a coloured row:  \begin{table} \caption{Table showing Feature 5's Functional Tests} \hspace*{-0.5in} \begin{tabular}[h!]{|p{0.6cm}|p{4cm}|p{5cm}|p{4cm}|p{1.5cm}|} \hline \rowcolor{gray!25} {\bf Test ID } &amp; {\bf Task } &amp; {\bf Expected} &amp; {\bf Actual} &amp; {\bf Outcome} \\ \hline    5.1 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.2 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.3 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline    5.4 &amp; Something &amp;  Something &amp; Something &amp;  Success \\ \hline \end{tabular}  \end{table}   Removing the \rowcolor{} command replacing it with \cellcolor{} creates the same view. Any idea how to fix this?  I've tried printing it out of Adobe and the lines print fine, but as this will be read on as a soft copy it's pretty important. .  Any idea how to fix this?
64742
I have a file test.pdf which I include in a document containing also an externalized pgfplots picture.  When I compile the following code, I get the error message Sorry, the system call pdflatex ... did NOT result in a usable file.  In order to make my code work, I first need to remove the includepdf statement, compile (to create the externalized figures) and then compile again with the includepdf statement.  I suppose that it is a bug, or is there any possibility to solve it ?  Of course, the file test.pdf is totally independent from the externalized pictures from pgfplots.  \documentclass{scrbook}   \usepackage{pgfplots}  \pgfplotsset{compat=1.8}  \usepgfplotslibrary[external]  \tikzexternalize[shell escape=-enable-write18]  \usepackage{pdfpages}   \begin{document} \includepdf{report_test-figure44}   \begin{tikzpicture}  \begin{axis}[  xlabel=Cost, ylabel=Error]  \addplot[color=red,mark=x] coordinates {  (2,-2.8559703) (3,-3.5301677) }; \end{axis}  \end{tikzpicture}   \end{document}
51703
I was trying out the  package in order to answer another . Having drawn the diagram for , I thought I'd try a slightly more complex example:  \documentclass[tikz,border=20pt,multi]{standalone} \usepackage{venndiagram} \begin{document} \begin{venndiagram3sets}   \fillOnlyA \end{venndiagram3sets} \end{document}   But this did not yield the expected results:    The diagram should shade just that part of set A which intersects with neither B nor C, as I understand it.  As far as I can tell, this example is just example 3 on pages 6/7 of the documentation. The issue is not caused by the use of standalone - I get the same results with article, except on a bigger page, obviously.  Have I missed something crucial or might this be a bug? I'm wondering if there's a compatibility issue with current versions of TikZ.
92822
The following code fails Option clash for package graphicx, it seems to be an incompatibility between the package graphicx (when the option pdftex is used) and the package tikz.  \documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{book} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}  \begin{document}      The lazy dog...  \end{document}   I am currently working with Debian wheezy (updated as of 10th November 2012), and the latest TeXLive LaTeX distribution included.  Any ideas?
22759
I once already asked a very similar question; . But this is some what different.  I have the following code;  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{graphics} \usepackage{tikz,pgfplots} \pgfplotsset{compat=1.6} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}  \begin{axis}[% width=3cm, height=3cm, scale only axis, every x tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, xmin=0, xmax=20000, xlabel={$t$}, xmajorgrids, xminorgrids, every y tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, ymin=0.0004, ymax=0.0012, ylabel={$\phi_{\mathrm{i}}(t)$}, ymajorgrids, yminorgrids, name=plot1]  \end{axis}  \begin{axis}[% width=3cm, height=3cm, scale only axis, every x tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, xmin=0, xmax=20000, xlabel={$t$}, xmajorgrids, xminorgrids, every y tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, ymin=0.2, ymax=1.2, ylabel={$h(t)$}, ymajorgrids, yminorgrids, name=plot2, at=(plot1.right of north east), anchor=left of north west]  \end{axis}  \begin{axis}[% width=3cm, height=3cm, scale only axis, every x tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, xmin=0, xmax=20000, xlabel={$t$}, xmajorgrids, xminorgrids, every y tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, ymin=0.0004, ymax=0.0012, ylabel={$\phi_{\mathrm{o}}(t)$}, ymajorgrids, yminorgrids, name=plot4, at=(plot1.below south west), anchor=above north west]  \end{axis}  \begin{axis}[% width=3cm, height=3cm, scale only axis, every x tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, xmin=0, xmax=20000, xlabel={$t$}, xmajorgrids, xminorgrids, every y tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, ymin=2000, ymax=12000, ylabel={$p_{\mathrm{i}}(t)$}, ymajorgrids, yminorgrids, name=plot5, at=(plot4.right of north east), anchor=left of north west]  \end{axis}  \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}   This creates the following plot:    I think there is to few vertical/horizontal spacing between the plots. I want to increase this. Currently I use x- yshift, this gives the following result:  \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{graphics} \usepackage{tikz,pgfplots} \pgfplotsset{compat=1.6} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}  \begin{axis}[% width=3cm, height=3cm, scale only axis, every x tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, xmin=0, xmax=20000, xlabel={$t$}, xmajorgrids, xminorgrids, every y tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, ymin=0.0004, ymax=0.0012, ylabel={$\phi_{\mathrm{i}}(t)$}, ymajorgrids, yminorgrids, name=plot1]  \end{axis}  \begin{axis}[% xshift=1cm, width=3cm, height=3cm, scale only axis, every x tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, xmin=0, xmax=20000, xlabel={$t$}, xmajorgrids, xminorgrids, every y tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, ymin=0.2, ymax=1.2, ylabel={$h(t)$}, ymajorgrids, yminorgrids, name=plot2, at=(plot1.right of north east), anchor=left of north west]  \end{axis}  \begin{axis}[% yshift=-1cm, width=3cm, height=3cm, scale only axis, every x tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, xmin=0, xmax=20000, xlabel={$t$}, xmajorgrids, xminorgrids, every y tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, ymin=0.0004, ymax=0.0012, ylabel={$\phi_{\mathrm{o}}(t)$}, ymajorgrids, yminorgrids, name=plot4, at=(plot1.below south west), anchor=above north west]  \end{axis}  \begin{axis}[% xshift=1cm, width=3cm, height=3cm, scale only axis, every x tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, xmin=0, xmax=20000, xlabel={$t$}, xmajorgrids, xminorgrids, every y tick label/.append style={font=\scriptsize\color{gray!80!black}}, ymin=2000, ymax=12000, ylabel={$p_{\mathrm{i}}(t)$}, ymajorgrids, yminorgrids, name=plot5, at=(plot4.right of north east), anchor=left of north west]  \end{axis}  \end{tikzpicture} \end{document}     I want to know if there is a more consistent manner to do this.
63774
This minimal example produces an error (undefined control sequences):  % !TEX TS-program = pdflatexmk  \documentclass{article}  \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{preview}  \begin{document}  Hello.  \end{document}   Once the tikz package is removed, it compiles fine. Removing either usepackage commands allows the program to compile. Moreover, including both, but adding the [active] option to preview allows the script to compile.   I've pasted the log file .
22308
Just writing the following very simple program I had some problems. I use to write in plain TeX and in this case I tried to make a picture with PSTricks and first of all sized it with \pspicture. The program is:  \input pstricks \pspicture (0,0)(5,5) \endpspicture \bye   but when I compiled with TeX, I encountered the following error:  Command Line:   tex.exe --src --interaction=errorstopmode "figura.tex" Startup Folder: C:\Users\MT\Documents\TeX  This is TeXk, Version 3.14159265 (TeX Live 2015/W32TeX) (preloaded format=tex)  Source specials enabled. (./figura.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pstricks/pstricks.tex we are running tex and have to define some LaTeX commands ... (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/xkeyval/pst-xkey.tex 2005/11/25 v1.6 PSTricks specialization of xkeyval (HA) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/xkeyval/xkeyval.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/xkeyval/xkvutils.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/xkeyval/keyval.tex)) 2014/12/03 v2.7a key=value parser (HA) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/xkeyval/xkvtxhdr.tex 2005/02/22 v1.1 xkeyval TeX header (HA)))) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pstricks/pst-fp.tex `pst-fp' v0.05, 2010/01/17 (hv)) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfutil-common.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfutil-common-lists.tex)) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfkeys.code.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfkeysfiltered.code.tex)) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgffor.code.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmath.code.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathcalc.code.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathutil.code.tex) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathparser.code.tex) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.code.tex (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.basic.code.tex) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.trigonometric.code .tex) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.random.code.tex) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.comparison.code.te x) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.base.code.tex) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.round.code.tex) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.misc.code.tex) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.integerarithmetics .code.tex))) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfloat.code.tex) )) `PSTricks' v2.64b  &lt;2015/14/11&gt; (tvz) (c:/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/pstricks/pstricks.con)) ! Undefined control sequence. \endpspicture ...z@ \box \pst@hbox \else \fboxsep                                                    =0pt \fbox {\rule [-\pst@s... l.5 \endpspicture  ? x No pages of output. Transcript written on figura.log.  _____________________________________________________________________   TeX Compilation Report (Pages: 0)   Errors: 1   Warnings: 0   Bad Boxes: 0 _____________________________________________________________________   What's the problem?
79752
The question how to create identical PDF files with pdflatex was basically answered in this question already:    The catch was to filter out the entry /ID in the trailer dictionary after the PDF file was created.  I am now forced to use xelatex and there this trick does not work any more, because there are many more changes in the resulting PDF files.  Here is the minimal working example again:  \documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage[]{hyperref} \hypersetup{         pdfauthor={None},         pdfcreationdate={D:20131010120000},         pdfmoddate={D:20131010120000} } \begin{document} foo  \end{document}   If I now create 2 PDF files, convert them to a hex dump and view the differences...  xelatex mwe.tex; mv mwe.pdf a.pdf; xxd a.pdf &gt; a.bin xelatex mwe.tex; mv mwe.pdf b.pdf; xxd b.pdf &gt; b.bin diff -u a.bin b.bin    ... then you can see that there are many differences in the resulting PDF files unfortunately.  Is there any way to produce bitwise identical PDF files with xelatex?  The reason I need this is that I'd like to create PDF files for a software release package. Of course the software release package should be identical when the underlaying software and documentation has not been changed.
92420
I have vector graphic created with Adobe Illustrator CS4 saved as PDF, it looks like:    You can download the PDF .  As you can see, the lines are black.    If I include the PDF with \includegraphics in a beamer document which has a changed foreground color, all lines of my graphic get colored in that color!  \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage{graphicx} \setbeamercolor{normal text}{bg=white,fg=red} \begin{document} \begin{frame} \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{dummy.pdf} \end{frame} \end{document}     Oh yes, that's unexpected.   What goes wrong? Is that really intended behaviour?  How do I get my lines black again?  If it's a problem related to the graphicx package, I'd prefer a solution by that package. But a beamer workaround would be fine as well. I tried to locally set  \setbeamercolor{normal text}{bg=white,fg=black}   but it does not have any effect. Also I need the foreground color as it is (non-black), just the graphic should be affected by the change.