At the suggestion of someone else, I am wondering what will happen to the existing answers in  if I try to get it migrated to another stack exchange site?  The current answer on the original site has some great answers and information that I hope to preserve if the question is moved.
2068
I posted a question which was closed as off-topic and it seems like it could fit on another site in the network. How can I go about moving it there?   What is migration? When can a question be migrated, and who can migrate it? When should I consider migration, and when is it inappropriate? What causes a migration to be blocked and what happens after? What causes a migration to be rejected and what happens after? Anything else I should know about migration?
55077
This has been , but a long time ago, and got closed for a rather confusing reason (converting comments to answers is not an "exact duplicate" of converting answers to comments), so I'm going to bring it up again.  I think it makes sense to have a user (not asker) option to convert a comment they posted on a question to an answer on the question, if it turns out it led to the asker figuring out the answer. We've all seen askers reply to comments with "@foo Hey, that was it! Post that as an answer and I'll accept it"; why not make it simple for the user to do that? It seems trivial to implement, and there's no formatting issues like there is going from answers to questions. I'm not sure how it could be "abused", because you need less rep to answer a question than to comment on it. I don't know if the answer's post time should be the time of the comment or the time it was converted; I think probably the latter. I also don't know if the comment should be deleted, left alone, or replaced with a link to the answer; again I think probably the last
89010
On Software Engineering I've been adding a message along these lines to old(ish) questions that have enough answers to be CW if they start getting new answers.     Please read all of the existing answers before posting yours. The question is relatively old and has a reasonable number of answers already. There is a good chance that your answer has already been posted.   I know most people don't read dialogs and just click "OK" to get through them, but if we can stop a few people adding to such questions then it's got to be good right?  The age of the question and the number of existing answers required that trigger this message can be configurable.
102166
See . Someone other than the OP changed the code to address a substantial problem with the it that was addressed as part of my answer. The problem was admittedly peripheral to the core question, but it was a primary differentiator between my answer and another answer submitted at the same time.  Any suggestions on what to do in this situation? Leave it be? Edit it back? Something else?  Update: I just found , from the "Related Links" section on the right, which is pretty relevant. I have to keep remembering to check there rather than just searching for answers.
100871
We don't migrate posts cause they can be answered by professional and enthusiast programmers. We migrate them because they are to do with SO careers, Teams or other products primarily on SO.        The current wording is somewhat misleading.  Could we have the wording for migration to this site reviewed and corrected?
25390
I suggest that when a post is migrated from one site to another, that the question vote score get reset to zero (or perhaps only a negative vote score is reset to zero). Often people will downvote a question when the only thing that's "wrong" with it is that it's posted on the incorrect site. After migration, those downvotes hang around as a negative score and may unfairly bias the treatment of the question.
29952
I've just answered .  After accepting the answer, the OP then changed his question to another problem - which I know I shouldn't have answered (I should have requested as new question) but I updated my answer anyway.  The OP has now edited his question to remove the essence of either the original or new problem, and instead has a statement saying that the problem has been fixed.  What is the correct thing to do here?  Roll the question back so it's in its original state? Roll it back to the "new problem" state? Leave it and let him continue to get downvoted and/or closed by people who didn't see the original question?
28093
Just curious. Generally when I see a closed or migrated question, the reasoning seems sound. This one caught my eye, however, and made me wonder if I've been wrong in my assumptions.    What were the criteria here for closing the question as "Off-Topic", as opposed to migrating to SF? Seemed a valid question to me, yet it was closed just a day after it was asked. Is the lack of immediate answers the problem?  Not trying to challenge the decision - as I said, just curious :-)
14020
I remember Jeff saying, when they announced Server Fault, that it was going to be possible to move questions between sites. I'd find that feature very nice as since then I've found at least 10 questions on either site that belonged to the other one.
77503
On Friday, I joined the  on a PC in order to . The Stack Exchange app was open on my phone already at this point, and I did not exit it.  Later on, I got a notification on my phone about having received an answer. It was a good one! When I tried to upvote the answer using the Android app, though, I wasn't allowed to: it said I hadn't joined the site, apparently not having caught up with the fact I had done so a couple of hours beforehand.  I apologise for the  in these screenshots. :) I plugged it in to charge minutes later, I promise!        When I said I wanted to join, though, I couldn't, unsurprisingly, on account of already having done so:        I closed the app entirely and reopened it, and then the app was happy that I was a member of Anime &amp; Manga. But it wasn't updated whilst the app was running.  The app should probably get informed of this. (Though this may be low priority due to not occurring all that often.)  This occurred on the Android App v1.0.51 on a HTC One running Android 4.4.3.
23185
How should SO handle users who don't "maintain" their questions by selecting answers, or remarking newer/better answers as the chosen one?  Many questions...   Have no answer marked correct, even when one is plainly there Are not reviewed by the poster to select a new correct answer   I don't mind taking the time to answer questions, but don't see the point when I don't get "reputation" for doing so since no one reads those questions, and reputation seems to be the point of the site.  I think the "remind to accept an answer" feature is there now, since I just saw it when coming back.  I missed it the first time though.
16852
I posted . I think it was probably a better fit for the , but for the reasons I cited in my question, I posted it on SO.     I deliberated whether to post this on code review or here. I came to   the conclusion that it is a straightforward question about PHP and   with the number of supporters here, it would likely get an answer, as   code review is slow and the question has a greater chance of not being   answered.   The answers and feedback have been amazing and, I believe, will add another good resource for visitors to the site.  I have attempted to be active on the Code Review SE, but there is not a great deal of interaction.   Can anyone suggest a way to support our Beta sites and yet still get good answers?
70154
Didn't find any talk of this so my curiosity got the best of me.  How do migrations handle favorited questions? My guess would be the favorite link would stay on the original site to the closed migrated question and I would assume any favorite marks would be reset on the site migrated to.  This isn't really that important, but just curious what happens.
19397
I am sure this scenario is familiar to all of you.  You click an unanswered question and after reading the question, you want to help and answer. After you answered, you remain the first and only answerer with a solution.  After 15-20 seconds from your answer posting time, another answer comes up, suggesting exactly the solution you have suggested, but with more text (not necessarily more detail).  After a minute, more answers pop up with, again, exactly the same solution you have suggested.  After an hour, your answer gets no votes, but the other answers each get at least 1 up-vote, and the one posted right after yours not only has the most votes, but is also accepted.  What would be an elegant solution to stop this? I am sure I am not the only one who is annoyed by this situation.  After speaking to others about this situation, one of them happened to mention in passing about hovering the mouse over the time of the posting to see the accuracy of the time posted, which I did not know about.
76415
One of the most popular questions on Stack Overflow,  has recently been deleted. Why was this done, rather than migrated to programmers.SE?  Does this not fall into the broad purview of Programmery questions, or is it really off topic?  I'm somewhat neutral on this myself, as I usually oppose "fun" questions that are there simply for fun's sake, but this is a rather old SO question and historically other similar questions from SO's infancy have been tolerated with grandfather status. Can anyone make a strong argument for or against?
109724
clearly belongs elsewhere, but the asker already put a bounty on the question.  If the question is migrated, does the rep get refunded? Does the question continue to be a bounty question on the target site if the user has enough rep? (The asker in the referenced question does not have any associated accounts, but I'm curious about what happens.)  Edit: I just tried to add my own close vote, but apparently you can't when there's an open bounty. However, a mod should still be able to close/migrate/etc.
122985
I've seen a number of cases when questions have been migrated from one site to another (SO--&gt;SF, SO--&gt;SU etc). If the original asker doesn't have an account on the site to which the question has been migrated, he basically loses track of the question.  This is especially true of questions that are migrated to SU which still needs a password having to do with . I suggest that once you have an account on one of the sites, you should also have an account in each of the sister sites so that you can easily keep track of all your questions that have been migrated. Edit:  I know you can link the accounts.  I just think this should be automatic in order to reduce friction.