This is the sentence I wrote:      It is as simple as adding or removing an item to/from the list.   Now I'm wondering if I should use "to" or "from" or "to/from" in:   Written English, Spoken English.
97320
Examples:        Data can be imported to and exported from the application.    Data can be imported and exported from the application.   Data can be imported to the application and exported from it.                  The manager defined the products that should be added to and removed from the store.   The manager defined the products that should be added and removed from the store.   The manager defined the products that should be added to the store and removed from it.      I assume that the third sentence is correct in my examples. My question is whether the two other sentences are correct.
70373
I bought this bike in|on|from|at an online store.  I bought this bike in|on|from|at November 13.  I bought this bike in|on|from|at a sale.  What is the appropriate situation where the words in, on, from, and at should be used?    I think something similar has been asked before, but I can't seem to find it in this SE site.
5671
Consider this:     I like to eat here.   vs     I would eat here.   It appears to me that "to" has nothing to do with the infinitive form of the verb that follows. It is, in this example,  an integral part of like to, not of to eat.  Is my thinking flawed? If you think it is, could you please explain which form of the verb "eat" is used in the second example, if not the infinitive?
69112
Here's a standard English sentence:     The folder which is missing from the principal's office contained the answers to today's exam.   (Separate question, discussed elsewhere I'm sure, whether it should really be "which" or "that".)  But simpler is usually better, so I would actually just write:     The folder missing from the principal's office ...   But my question is: I have seen legal statements which would write:     The folder, which folder is missing from the principal's office, contained ...   Assuming that the writer is actually correct in thinking that s/he's adding some value by repeating "folder" after the "which", what value is s/he adding?
63355
My name is Tom and my friend's name is Anna.  Anna has a plan to go to Croatia in summer(she bought her flight tickets)  if I talk about her plans , is ''will'' or ''going to '' correct to use in the sentence?(when talking about someone else's plans)  A) Anna will fly to Croatia in summer.  B)Anna is going to fly to Croatia in summer.  if I talk about my planned actions 'going to' is used ,  EX;  I am going to fly to Croatia in summer (not I will.......)  which one (will or going to) is supposed to be used for the context above?
80181
I'm a passionate Korean English-learner, and I would like to ask you a question about grammar.   It was 3 years ago when I first started to study the to-infinitive as studying grammar with Grammar In Use series and English Grammar series by Longman, having been exposed to English for 3 years. There wasn't any mention of the author saying that the usage of the to-infinitive is as an (direct) object. And for me also, the times I have encountered sentences in which the usage of the to-infinitive, so to speak, as direct objects were used, I've read them as some kind of obligatory adverbial that shows what the verbs are about, not as objects, which means they are noun phases! 100% of Korean textbooks say the usage is as a direct object, but I doubt it. I think it's some kind of obligatory adverbial that shows what the verbs are about.    I thought it was better for me to ask Americans themselves. Do you read this usage of to-infinitive as a noun phrase or an adverbial?
27976
"To delete" is to "deletion" as "to discard" is to what?
120071
In the sentence-     You must wear a suit to an interview   shouldn't the to be replaced by for? Or what's the difference between these two here?
68472
Actually I should be working on my bachelor report (it's due tonight), but hey, there are more important things like: Can I omit the to in the following sentence?     ... foster behaviour that would help the robot population (to) adapt to the MONEE environment.
77737
English (other than American English) has a clear differentiation between the two words. Both are about translocating something. In "bring" the something of somebody is moved to where the speaker is currently situated. "Take" is used to translocate something or somebody to a place that the speaker is not currently at.   You cannot “bring” your books to school if you are currently at home. You can only take them to school. Most of the time one can get the meaning from the context of the sentence but it can get very confusing when the other party is on the telephone and you do not know their location.   Why does American English not differentiate and when did it lose the differentiation?
41747
I saw the sentence like     Donald Trump to run for president next month.   in the newspaper on the internet.  But I don't know why we have to use to instead of will.  Is there any rule I don't know?  Can anyone tell me the reason why we should use to in the news?
27979
I'd appreciate your assistance in helping me particularly understand how to use the phrase "as of" properly.   What is the proper interpretation of the following sentence?  "I need you to get me all transactions as of January 23rd"   That I need all transactions from the beginning of time (so to speak) till January 23rd, or That I need all transactions from January 23rd to now?   Would "as at" be more appropriate to express (1)?  Would "as from" be more appropriate to express (2)?
72808
I've just caught myself out twice by writing something down as being interesting for me! This is a typical Italian mother-tongue error, but Italian is not my first language. It used to be English, but now I'm no longer sure.   And yet when I say the above phrase it sounds OK. I feel comfortable saying it, so am I right to use the preposition for in this way? If as a linguist said: "Grammar is about how people really speak, not about how they ought to speak."  Here is a  which nicely sums up the difference between interesting to me and interesting for me.     Something you do is interesting for you.         Something people do or say is interesting to you.
61598
Please help me to choose the right verb.     Its inside and outside is/are the same.   If you would please explain your answer a bit.
4507
What is the correct way to use infinitive after the verb "help": with or without "to"?  For example:     Please, help me to understand this.   or:     Please, help me understand this.
37714
What is difference between  Could you sell your old computer to me, seeing (that) you have no use for it. Can you sell your old computer to me, seeing (that) you have no use for it.  Can I use either one of them? Which one is grammatically correct or if both are, what is the difference in meaning?
110813
I have a question about the use of the word to as a time proposition. Is to inclusive in the following sentence?     I worked at company X from April 2012 to April 2013.