There needs to be a way to identify questions that have been delete voted on the deleted votes page of the 10k moderator tools.  It would be nice to see less of the text in the red box:        I get it that each question needs to be viewed so it can be voted on. I have 5 votes a day, there are currently 100's of questions in the queue that need to be viewed, I can't remember from day to day which questions I've voted on and which ones I haven't. I am much less likely to actually use the modrator tools to clean up extremely bad questions if it is difficult to do, and I'm not the only one, as the review queue keeps going up from day to day.   Could we get an indicator in the delete votes 10k moderator tools to indicate if a question has already been voted on?  Something that looks like the image below? That says "Reviewed" or "Voted". A check mark would even suffice.        The queues in some of the sites are quite large, I think this is partially because it is hard to vote to delete questions. At the end of the day, there needs to be some way for us who use the moderator tools to know what has been voted on and see less of the red box.  The duplicate mark is for a question that is six years old and nothing has been done. And mine is different because I made a suggestion of actual ways this could be implemented. There have been multiple requests for variations of something like this, an there have been zero comments from any of the powers that be that can actually change this to say yea or nay. I would like -- in the least that this be addressed in some way
121931
The close and delete tabs of the  can get fairly cluttered, even here on MSO; I imagine it's ten times worse on SO. Could the page be modified to indicate which question(s) you've already voted to close or delete?
105021
Well, I already searched meta as well as cleared my browser cache.  I realize this may be a SO cache problem, but it still seems kind of strange to me.    The deleted question is (assuming it still exists).  Shouldn't deleted questions only be visible to 10k users?  I'm only at 2k.
20465
A while back, a new dashboard was added to the user moderation tools to .  It's great for scouring a user's comment history to find certain comments, but I can't do anything from this dashboard except filter by flagged1, deleted, or active comments, and visit the posts to which the comments are attached where I can then edit or delete them.  Can we have the ability to edit and delete comments from this dashboard just as we're able to from the flag queue? It gets particularly tedious to have to open 100 tabs just to delete 100 spam comments from the posts they're attached to (and no, I'm not making that number up2...).    1 .  2 Alright, fine, I made that up; the actual number of spam comments I had to delete was 111.
104590
The site FAQ refers to moderation tools, available to users who've earned more than 10,000 reputation:      10,000 &nbsp; Delete closed questions, access to moderation tools   What are these tools exactly?
111424
I was thinking about some of the things said in  and how so many questions seem surmountable. You've already given us a way to break down that queue into smaller chunks by , but we have no idea if the section we're trying to "clean up" is 3 posts or 30,000.  Could you add a number somewhere to the Review screen showing us how many posts there are to review in our filtered Review Queue?  (Ideally, a date range filter option would be nice too, to allow us to further break down the queue into manageable sizes for a single person to clear on their own)  Edit: Based on the success and some of the comments on  when the Close Vote Queue was temporarily reduced in size and a post created to list the top Tags and Count of posts, I think this would help increase participation of reviewers in the Close Vote Queue a lot.
36891
I was wondering about a question similar to  (for another site), where my &quot;stats&quot; are currently &quot;10/5&quot; (instead of &quot;13/5&quot;). The answer from &quot;Shadow Wizard&quot; links to , which links to yet another &quot;&quot;. This last answer has some details about the actual calculation (like the &quot;10&quot; in my case), which is like so:  A positive question record means you don't have too many closed, downvoted or deleted questions, overall. The formula is (total questions - negative questions - closed - deleted)/total questions &gt;= 0.5. Questions that have been downvoted and closed and deleted count three times in this calculation!  Somewhere I also read that these deleted questions seem to count for 3. But the OPer of a deleted question cannot see deleted questions anymore after a while (X days) either. So that seems to make it impossible to actually &quot;verify&quot; your own score (the &quot;7&quot; part), and also how many more &quot;good questions&quot; will be needed. In my case, I'm aware (remember) that there has been at least 1 question deleted. So I assume in my case the &quot;7&quot; must become at least &quot;8&quot; (I don't have negative or closed questions), though I doubt that will be sufficient. Also because I have 2 more questions with a zero votes balance (which makes me wonder also how accurate the &quot;total questions&quot; in the above quote really is ...). My suggestion: think of a way to somehow clarify (visualize) the formula quoted above. Or as a variation at least provide some way to find out the exact number of you questions that were ever deleted (not just the recently deleted ones). Or maybe some other type of indication to indicate &quot;how much more good questions are needed to ever receive the &quot;Curious&quot; badge. Update: I recently learned about adding deleted:yes to a query. With that, these are some more stats about my questions (using &quot;12345&quot; to represent my user id from the site where this question is about):  user:12345 is:q - results in 14 (not deleted) questions, 11 of them have a positive (&gt; 0) voting balance, none of these 14 are closed.  user:12345 is:q deleted:yes - results in 7 (deleted) questions, with this Status / Voting balance for each of them:       Question id Status Voting Balance     1 Closed +4   2 Duplicate +2   3 Migrated 0   4 Duplicate 0   5 Duplicate 0   6 Closed -1   7 Closed -4     So with that extra info, and as per the &quot;Questions that have been downvoted and closed and deleted count three times in this calculation!&quot; I think (guess) in my case the 2 deleted questions with negative voting balance corresponds to -(2*3)=-6 ... So that the &quot;stats&quot; in my case will have to become something equivalent to &quot;(11-6)/5&quot; = &quot;5/5&quot; ... Just guessing, and fingers crossed to see what will happen if I ever post a new question on that site that does not get downvoted+deleted (assuming all other votes for my existing questions don't change in the meantime).
97770
Update: This has been implemented according to the .    OK, so  is the  time I've come across a perfectly valid bug report here on meta.SO that was closed as a duplicate, and the question it was closed as a duplicate of then deleted.  Since I don't have 10k here on MSO, I can't really tell when or why those questions were deleted, but I assume there were valid reasons for it.  However, regardless of the reasons for the deletion, having the questions that were closed as duplicates of the deleted question remain closed seems like a disservice to users.  Presumably, a duplicate of a deleted question either:   is no longer a duplicate, and should therefore be reopened; or is crap, just like the deleted question, and should therefore also be deleted.   I therefore propose that, when a question is deleted, any other questions closed as duplicates of it should be automatically flagged for reopening and/or deletion.  I'll leave the exact implementation details for the devs to decide, but one option might be to just add the dupes to both the reopen and the deletion queue, and let the reviewers in those queues decide their fate.  Or perhaps the 10k auto-flag system used e.g. for "questions closed without comment" could be adapted for this purpose too.  Edit: I like  of automatically adding dupes of deleted questions to the reopen review queue, but with the "leave closed" button replaced with "delete" / "recommend deletion" (since just leaving the question closed is not really a useful option in this situation).
33152
Could we have a method of explaining why we think a question or answer should be deleted?  It could work identically to closing a question, maybe with an additional text-input box (like the "Requires Moderator attention" flag option) to provide additional info because the reasons for deletion should really be more specific..  For example, "exact duplicate" doesn't explain to me the user has re-posted the same question, thus, it should definitely be deleted (not just left closed). Like with close-messages, these reasons would be listed under the deleted item (or answer).   I don't think comments are suitable, as they can be a pain to quickly.. "extract" deletion reasons from them - I have to scan through the comments, and they may all be irrelevant.  Equally, for un-deletion, it'd be useful to know why another user thinks a question should be restored. For example "new user deleted the question after they accepted an answer", or "Jeff went insane and started deleting any questions with the letter O in it".  I think requiring un-deletion reasons is possibly more important, since commenting is disabled on deleted questions - we have no way of explaining why we think it should be restored
74656
The  was deleted last night by the Community user.    Normally, I wouldn't see an issue with this, but for this particular deletion, I can see three issues:   We try not to delete good content There are multiple upvoted answers We often use previous answers on Meta (as well as badly asked questions) to form the precedent (and to use as duplicates) when users ask questions like this in the future   On a personal note, I find it easier to link to one of my previous answers whenever possible.  This seems like a bug with the deletion algorithm, , the deletion algorithm should never delete questions with upvoted answers.  I'm going to go ahead and undelete it, but I'm bringing this up in case there was either:    A policy change A bug   So is it either of the above or something else?
96800
A user asks a question. It gets downvoted.(to oblivion) And then gets deleted by a mod.     This question should then be accessible to the user in the "deleted recent questions" link but this doesn't happen.    If a user has asked only one question (which gets deleted) then this link goes missing. Only after asking another question (which must not get deleted), is the user able to see that link.     Is this a bug or a new-user-restriction?
40186
I recently posted an answer that was a little controversial, I suppose.  While watching the page the answer was voted up and down a few times.  Is there a way to view the vote history?  Also, would there be any support for adding some sort of activity indicator?  My reasoning is this, you could potentially have a question or answer with "0 votes" that actually had numerous votes.  Visually seeing 0 votes indicates the question hasn't had any attention when exactly the opposite could be the case.  Thoughts?
70027
I deleted one of my questions and would like to undelete it. This requires finding the question.  I think you shouldn't be prevented from seeing your own posts that you have deleted. It should be easier than me remembering the link or checking the browser history to easily look these up.   I would currently need 10K to see my deleted items and even then if I can find their URL.
12891
We should recover close votes cast on questions which are deleted by the owner before actually being closed.   For example, a user posts a question, and I think to myself that it looks familiar. A search turns up one (or several) pretty clear duplicates, so I vote to close and provide the link to the older question(s). A short time later, the OP comes by and realizes that their question is, indeed, a duplicate and decides to delete it.  What I don't like about this is that I've essentially "wasted" a close vote. Now I'll admit, I've never actually used all my allotted close votes in a day yet, but it's a little disappointing to know that I've effectively squandered a vote pointlessly when it could have been used for something more productive instead (i.e. a question that really ought to be closed for whatever reason).  I suppose there's also some hypothetical room for abuse of this current mechanic (trying to force people to waste votes), but with moderators on the boards I think that's a non-issue.
104568
currently shows "Review completed 21 mins ago" with one "Delete" vote and five "Recommend Deletion" votes.    However, ; how can the review be completed with all "Delete" votes, yet the answer remains undeleted?  EDIT: This was finally deleted by a moderator, but my question still stands: what's going on here?  EDIT 2:  Looks like this just  (six "Recommend Deletion" votes, but it's still around), so whatever it is, it's still going on.
10498
The  is currently showing [closed], [duplicated] and [on hold] questions at the need answer tab. My suggestion is to hide them since they can't be answered.   Sorting by "votes" at SO, we see tons of [duplicated] questions filling almost the entire first page. This way is harder to find good questions (= high upvoted) to answer.
47035
I found  (only visible to 10k+ users on SFF, sorry) which had been deleted from review some hours ago but also flagged for conversion to a comment. I undeleted it and converted it to a comment (which of course re-deletes the answer), only to see that the post claimed to have been "deleted from review just now" by the same list of users as before.  Here's a screenshot of the timeline:    And here's one of what the post itself looks like now:    It was actually deleted from review 3 hours ago and then undeleted and redeleted by me 36 minutes ago, but to a casual observer it looks like it was deleted from review 36 minutes ago.  I'm posting this as a  report because it's technically showing incorrect information, but I'd be perfectly happy to be told it's actually a new feature. In fact, I've often found it annoying that when a whole bunch of users have voted to delete a post and then I convert it to a comment, their votes don't show up and it looks like I've acted unilaterally to remove it. This kind of remedies that.
48082
For example,  question's timeline is 404 for 10k users, who are supposed to be able to see deleted posts.        So, can we 10k+ users be able to see deleted questions'  like we can on ?