death penalty and why it should be abolished?
55230
Reasons to abolish the death penalty Execution is the ultimate, irrevocable punishment: the risk of executing an innocent person can never be eliminated. ... Others have been executed despite serious doubts about their guilt. It does not deter crime.
1335312
Some of those against capital punishment believe that human life is so valuable that even the worst murderers should not be deprived of the value of their lives. They believe that the value of the offender's life cannot be destroyed by the offender's bad conduct - even if they have killed someone.
354763
['It is irreversible and mistakes happen. Execution is the ultimate, irrevocable punishment: the risk of executing an innocent person can never be eliminated. ... ', 'It does not deter crime. ... ', 'It is often used within skewed justice systems. ... ', 'It is discriminatory. ... ', 'It is used as a political tool.']
868563
Originally Answered: Should capital punishment be banned in India? Yes, it should be. Capital punishment is not a deterrent. If the person found guilty is executed, this will not prevent another criminal from doing the same crime.
519752
It is also inevitable that innocent people will be convicted and sentenced to death in the world and such mistakes cannot be put right. ... The reintroduction of U.K capital punishment would not come without its mistakes, and, it could cause misery to the offenders' families.
769553
And here are the advantages. It deters bad people to commit heinous crimes. It is what hardened criminals deserve. Some of the crimes that are under capital punishment include murder and rape, depending on the country or state legalizing the practice.
1390205
The death penalty doesn't seem to deter people from committing serious violent crimes. The thing that deters is the likelihood of being caught and punished. ... ...research has failed to provide scientific proof that executions have a greater deterrent effect than life imprisonment.
213326
— Canada should have an automatic death penalty for people convicted of two separate, first-degree murders. ... — Bringing back the death penalty is necessary. It is an important deterrent to very serious offences. The death penalty is necessary but can be only used for very serious offences and in the most prudent way.
188677
['Value of human life.', 'The right to live.', 'Execution of the innocent.', 'Retribution is wrong.', 'Deterrence.', 'It brutalises society.', "It's too expensive.", 'People not responsible for their acts.']
375186
Vicious murderers must be killed to prevent them from murdering again, either in prison, or in society if they should get out. Both as a deterrent and as a form of permanent incapacitation, the death penalty helps to prevent future crime.
886625
The SA Constitutional Court abolishes the death penalty. On 6 June 1995 a historic resolution was taken by the Constitutional Court to abolish the death penalty. The court ruled that capital punishment, as provided for under the Criminal Procedure Act, was in conflict with the country's 1994 constitution.
626050
Philippines: Do not revive the Death Penalty. ... The reasons behind the reinstatement of the death penalty are ill founded and purely a political one. Numerous studies and analyses have concluded that death penalty does not deter crime. Indeed, there has been no existing reliable evidence to prove otherwise.
505829
Most death penalty cases involve the execution of murderers although capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes. Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment.
931741
['Capital punishment is irreversible. ... ', 'Taking immediate action on the criminals and imposing severe punishments can act as deterrent, but not death penalty.', 'Capital punishment interprets society as violent cultured, blood thirsty and revengeful.', 'Justice will not be achieved by death penalty.']
226061
It doesn't deter criminals There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison term. In fact, evidence reveals the opposite. Since abolishing the death penalty in 1976, Canada's murder rate has steadily declined and as of 2016 was at its lowest since 1966.
1222717
A: No, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. ... And states that have abolished capital punishment show no significant changes in either crime or murder rates. The death penalty has no deterrent effect.
1398479
It is an inhumane, ineffective punishment and is never the solution. The Philippines' attempts to reintroduce it are clearly unlawful. ... Under international law, the death penalty must be restricted to most serious crimes, and drug related crimes do not meet this threshold.