would have or would of?
440766
When people write would of, should of, could of, will of or might of, they are usually confusing the verb have with the preposition of. So would of is would have, could of is could have, should of is should have, will of is will have, and might of is might have: I would of come earlier, but I got stuck at work.
1040512
1 Answer. Grammatically it is correct. The first 'that' would be a conjunction; something like 'I thought that' or 'I feel that'. The second 'that' would be a pronoun, such as 'that wasn't a thing' or 'that was no longer acceptable'.
182400
Will and would are verbs, and each can be used many different ways. Will can be a present tense verb that means to cause something to happen through force of desire. It can also be a modal auxiliary verb in various tenses. Would is a past tense form of will.
100647
Begin, therefore, cannot be coupled with has, have or had. Began cannot be coupled with has, have, or had. It is only with begun, a past participle that has, have, or had can go with it. Hence, has begun is correct.
431843
As nouns the difference between hypothetical and conditional is that hypothetical is a hypothetical situation or proposition while conditional is (grammar) a conditional sentence; a statement that depends on a condition being true or false.
521628
QUESTION FORMS WITH “DO” AND “BE” If the sentence has “BE”, use “be” first to make the question. If the sentence doesn't have “BE” (or other auxiliary), add “DO”. Check the verb form. Are you?
1344234
For example: "If it rains, you will stay home." The second conditional: "If I were you, I would look for another job. " The third conditional: "If you had studied harder, you would have become an engineer." What is the correct structure for the third conditional?
501517
['To be: am, is, are, was, were, be, been.', 'To have: have, has, had.', 'To do: do, does, did.']
744962
And we can talk about these now, because mixed conditionals are used to talk about the present and the past in the same sentence – The IF clause will have a different tense to the RESULTS clause. ... So this is third conditional isn't it – both the IF clause, and the results clause are in the past.
143023
The first conditional describes something that is possible, and could really happen. 2. The second conditional describes something that is possible, but will almost certainly not happen. ... Often there only difference between the first and the second conditional is the speaker's opinion.
1122318
We use the phrases would you mind + -ing form, and do you mind + -ing form to ask people politely to do things. Would you mind is more polite and more common: ... When we ask for permission politely, we can use would you mind if I + past or do you mind if I + present: Would you mind if I turned on this light?
948807
'If' introduces one condition, whereas 'whether' introduces alternative possibilities, usually with the use of 'or not'. Both 'if' and 'whether' are sometimes used interchangeably, especially when responding to yes/no questions. 'Whether' is used to present two alternatives, neither of which is a conditional.
1302519
A slight correction, normally we would say "Is it okay with you if..." If you are trying to get a bit more formal, you could say "Would it be alright with you if..." or "Would it be possible for me to take it..."
649869
The correct grammar in this case is "had woken". The sentence is in the past perfect tense using "had" and the correct participle for "to wake" is woken. So to be absolutely correct, the proper form is "I had just woken up...."
1217990
Yes, basically, "may or may not have ..." means that you don't know whether he/she did or didn't do whatever it was. English Only.
610298
Verbos en inglés: cómo usar could, would y should en pasado. Could, would y should son tres verbos modales (modal verbs) que pueden utilizarse para referir a situaciones hipotéticas que podrían haber ocurrido en el pasado pero que no sucedieron.
158718
These past modal verbs are all used hypothetically, to talk about things that didn't really happen in the past. 1: Could have + past participle means that something was possible in the past, or you had the ability to do something in the past, but that you didn't do it. (See also modals of ability.)