is proportionality a ground for judicial review?
445799
Proportionality is one of the most important grounds for judicial review. It has been a ground for many years and has evolved from the concept of unreasonableness. The concept of proportionality has been developed more as a general principle of law by the judges over the years.
1076294
Judicial review is a form of court proceeding, usually in the Administrative Court1, in which the judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action, or a failure to act, by a public body exercising a public function. It is only available where there is no other effective means of challenge.
378384
It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional, though what counts as obviously unconstitutional is itself a matter of some debate. Judicial restraint is sometimes regarded as the opposite of judicial activism.
63650
Proportionality test is a legal method used by courts, typically constitutional courts, to decide hard cases, that is cases where legitimate rights collide. ... In order to decide such cases correctly, the court must balance the rights and the damage to them resulting from a judgment.
1291025
Judicial Review: A Discretionary Remedy. Judicial review is a discretionary remedy. This means that just because a claimant establishes that a public body has erred in law, he is not automatically entitled to the remedy he seeks, or indeed, any remedy at all.
1302570
Judicial review is the process by which a court reviews a decision, act or failure to act by a public body or other official decision maker. It is only available where other effective remedies have been exhausted and where there is a recognised ground of challenge.
1171702
Because the power of judicial review can declare that laws and actions of local, state, or national government are invalid if they conflict with the Constitution. It also gives courts the power to declare an action of the executive or legislative branch to be unconstitutional.
610904
Rights-based judicial review (whether of legislation or of administrative decisions) increases the legal system's respect for individual and minority rights; federalism-based judicial review increases protects federalism (and thus democracy); review of administrative decisions for procedural fairness serves to protect ...
960081
In common law, judges refer back to earlier cases to justify their decisions, and damages are only remedy. Equity differs in its creativity (new legal concepts, and aims to be more flexible and fair.
338056
Judicial review—the process of deciding whether a law is constitutional or not, and declaring the law null and void if it is found to be in conflict with the Constitution—is not mentioned in the Constitution, but was effectively created by the Court itself in the important 1803 case Marbury v. Madison.
655156
Judicial review in English law. ... A person who feels that an exercise of power is unlawful may apply to the Administrative Court (a division of the High Court) for a court to decide whether a decision followed the law. If the court finds the decision unlawful it may have it set aside (quashed) and possibly award damages.
386208
Judicial review is the power of the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether a law or decision by the legislative or executive branches of federal government, or any court or agency of the state governments is constitutional. ... The power of judicial review was established in the 1803 Supreme Court case of Marbury v. Madison.
1462904
In the US and other countries with a decentralized system of judicial review, concrete review is part and parcel of the ordinary jurisdiction of courts, and the parties to that litigation have all the rights which parties before the courts normally have.
1078426
Federalist No. 78 discusses the power of judicial review. It argues that the federal courts have the job of determining whether acts of Congress are constitutional and what must be done if government is faced with the things are done on the contrary of the Constitution.
690507
Judicial review is the power of the courts to decide whether laws and actions of the government are allowed under the Constitution. When a court decides they are not allowed, it orders that the law or action be considered null and void.
705869
Judicial Review is the power of the U.S. Supreme Court to review laws and actions from Congress and the President to determine whether they are constitutional. This is part of the checks and balances that the three branches of the federal government use in order to limit each other and ensure a balance of power.
238
Judicial review proceedings Judicial review is a court process used to enforce the principle of legality under the rule of law (section 1(c) of the Constitution) and the right to just administrative action (section 33 of the Constitution, given effect to by the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, 2000 (PAJA)).