can cohort studies determine causation?
440877
Cohort studies provide the best information about the causation of disease, because you follow persons from exposure to the occurrence of the disease. With data from cohort studies you can calculate cumulative incidences, which are the most direct measurement of the risk of developing disease.
279162
Cohort. A cohort refers to a group of individuals who have common characteristics such as age, experience, location, or generation. ... In developmental psychology, cohorts represent a methodological concern because age and cohort can be confounding variables. Thus, in many studies there is a risk of a cohort effect.
756461
The description of studies as prospective or retrospective with respect to timing of study conduct is uninformative. ... Prospective studies usually refer to prospective cohort studies where a group of similar individuals are followed up over time. Cross-sectional studies measure parameters at a single point of time.
772764
In prospective studies, individuals are followed over time and data about them is collected as their characteristics or circumstances change. Birth cohort studies are a good example of prospective studies. In retrospective studies, individuals are sampled and information is collected about their past.
789100
This paper describes the core features of the R package geepack, which implements the generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach for fitting marginal generalized linear models to clustered data. Clustered data arise in many applications such as longitudinal data and repeated measures.
1327619
A confounding variable, also called a confounder or confounding factor, is a third variable in a study examining a potential cause-and-effect relationship. ... A confounding variable is a third variable that influences both the independent and dependent variables.
1390545
By collecting data from multiple points in time for each subject, repeated measures designs can assess effects over time. This tracking is particularly useful when there are potential time effects, such as learning or fatigue.
519838
A Confounder is a variable whose presence affects the variables being studied so that the results do not reflect the actual relationship. There are various ways to exclude or control confounding variables including Randomization, Restriction and Matching.
218807
A confounding variable, also called a confounder or confounding factor, is a third variable in a study examining a potential cause-and-effect relationship. A confounding variable is related to both the supposed cause and the supposed effect of the study.
813937
Potential sources of bias in cohort studies A major source of potential bias in cohort studies is due to losses to follow-up. Cohort members may die, migrate, change jobs or refuse to continue to participate in the study. In addition, losses to follow-up may be related to the exposure, outcome or both.
585457
In epidemiology, confounding variables to signify a covariate that is related to both predictors & treatment/exposure. There are also who focus on the effect of a confounder: "A Confounder is a variable whose presence affects the variables being studied so that the results do not reflect the actual relationship".
1261911
In a controlled study, researchers are able to determine which of their subjects receive the factor that is being tested for having a causal influence upon another factor. ... In uncontrolled or observational studies, researchers have no such control over whether their subjects receive the treatment being investigated.
1286733
['#1. Presumed cause and presumed effect must covary.', '#2. Presumed cause must precede presumed effect.', '#3. Non-spurriousness.']
663851
12.2. There are three basic types of correlational studies that are used in eHealth evaluation: cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies (Vandenbroucke et al., 2014). ... Cross-sectional studies – These are considered a type of cohort study where only one comparison is made between exposed and unexposed subjects.
142963
Cross-sectional study. ... Cross-sectional studies are descriptive studies (neither longitudinal nor experimental). Unlike case-control studies, they can be used to describe, not only the odds ratio, but also absolute risks and relative risks from prevalences (sometimes called prevalence risk ratio, or PRR).
236533
The time variable is concerned with variation in the occurrence of disease in time and its seasonality or periodicity. A hypothetical example of a descriptive epidemiologic study is the investigation of a group of workers in a factory who have what is suspected of being environmentally acquired lupus.
1039700
Cohort studies work well for rare exposures–you can specifically select people exposed to a certain factor. But this design does not work for rare diseases–you would then need a large study group to find sufficient disease cases.