why capital punishment is morally wrong?
8485
Is capital punishment moral? Capital punishment is often defended on the grounds that society has a moral obligation to protect the safety and welfare of its citizens. Murderers threaten this safety and welfare. Only by putting murderers to death can society ensure that convicted killers do not kill again.
986483
Like those barbaric practices, executions have no place in a civilized society. It is unusual because only the United States of all the western industrialized nations engages in this punishment. It is also unusual because only a random sampling of convicted murderers in the United States receive a sentence of death.
757451
Capital punishment should be abolished. Argue for or against the proposition. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment is a legal procedure in which a state executes a person for crimes he/she has committed. ... Death penalty does not deter crime, it is an act of simply annihilating a criminal.
879766
Cruel and unusual punishment includes torture, deliberately degrading punishment, or punishment that is too severe for the crime committed. ... Many people have argued that capital punishment (see also capital punishment) should be considered cruel and unusual punishment.
346904
Capital punishment does not violate human rights and is an essential part of any judicial system. ... I also feel that I must state that while I support the principle of the death penalty, I still hold some reservations on its implementation in the United States.
1260371
Capital punishment benefits society because it may deter violent crime. ... If the losses society imposes on criminals are less than those the criminals imposed on their innocent victims, society would be favoring criminals, allowing them to get away with bearing fewer costs than their victims had to bear.
1038755
The death penalty should be abolished because of many reasons. Many people believe the saying, 'an eye for an eye'. ... The death penalty should be abolished because it is racist, punishes the poor, condemns those who are innocent to death, and is a cruel punishment.… show more content…
1054580
Both use the word moral in their definitions. Immoral fails to conform of accepted morality while unethical is not morally correct.
851049
The death penalty did reinstate crimes by two thirds therefore making the penalty a safer easy research paper. ... Also there is no chance of re-offending as the penalty of people who are willing to do such a crime will effectively be wiped out. A judge could death a man to life in prison.
72141
It makes it impossible for criminals to do bad things over and over again. Executing someone permanently stops the worst criminals and means we can all feel safer, as they can't commit any more crimes. If they were in prison they might escape, or be let out for good behaviour.
785174
So, given a choice between life in prison and execution by the state, most people much prefer life and therefore will refrain from misconduct for which death is the punishment. ... Given the greater value of innocent lives, the less risky, better option justifies capital punishment on grounds of deterrence.
889153
Legal wrongs are usually quite clearly defined in the law of a state and/or jurisdiction. ... Moral wrong is an underlying concept for legal wrong. Some moral wrongs are punishable by law, for example, rape or murder. Other moral wrongs have nothing to do with law.
506073
Death penalty should be scrapped because it can lead to the execution of innocent people. The justice system is bound to make mistakes and so, the accused people should be given achance to appeal, and prove their innocence other than being murdered because of mistakes made by judges.
468031
Arguments against the Death Penalty There's no concrete evidence showing that the death penalty actually deters crime. ... These inconclusive findings mean that capital punishment may or may not be a deterrent for crime. No definitive answer is reason enough to abolish it.
1207582
By using the death penalty so arbitrarily, authorities set their own definitions for what's “unacceptable” in society and what's an appropriate punishment. It makes citizens fearful and violates their human rights. Allowing the death penalty to exist allows corrupt governments to use executions for their own purposes.
30224
["You can't take it back. The death penalty is irreversible. ... ", "It doesn't deter criminals. There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison term. ... ", "There's no 'humane' way to kill. ... ", "It makes a public spectacle of an individual's death. ... ", 'The death penalty is disappearing.']
382046
The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral. ... It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not.