has riemann hypothesis been proven?
6256
Most mathematicians believe that the Riemann hypothesis is indeed true. Calculations so far have not yielded any misbehaving zeros that do not lie in the critical line. However, there are infinitely many of these zeros to check, and so a computer calculation will not verify all that much.
1058246
Then the prime factorization is complete. The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic guarantees that all prime factorizations of the same number will result in the same, unique prime factorization for the number. Example: We show two of the ways of constructing a factor tree for 24.
324868
r/math. Is Pi an odd or even number, or is it impossible to know? It is not an even number nor an odd number, no. Those are concepts that don't mean anything for non-integer real numbers.
1359958
Yes. Every real number is necessarily a rational number or an irrational number.
587827
When a function is negative, Riemann sums seem to treat it as having "negative area".
195429
Answer and Explanation: Yes, the quotient of two rational numbers is always rational, and the reason for this lies in the fact that the product of two integers is always an...
1411460
Every odd number greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes. (A prime may be used more than once in the same sum.) This conjecture is called "weak" because if Goldbach's strong conjecture (concerning sums of two primes) is proven, then this would also be true.
1245106
All mathematicians in the study considered proofs valuable for students because they offer students new methods, important concepts and exercise in logical reasoning needed in problem solving. The study shows that some mathematicians consider proving and problem solving almost as the same kind of activities.
90857
It is a non -terminating non recurring decimal number. Any number multiplied with an irrational number is also irrational. And hence 2 π is an irrational number. No, π is not a rational number.
754264
The number √3 is irrational ,it cannot be expressed as a ratio of integers a and b. To prove that this statement is true, let us Assume that it is rational and then prove it isn't (Contradiction).
422299
your answer is: All rational numbers are not integers. But all integers are rational numbers. The statement is false.
733607
Srinivasa Ramanujan: You wanted to know how I get my ideas. God speaks to me. Fellow: There are no proofs!
1187773
['That is, every even number greater than two can be expressed as the sum of two prime numbers.', "This is known as Goldbach's Conjecture. It is an open problem, but has been demonstrated for even numbers up to (four billion billion). ... ", 'Footnotes.']
307634
Euclid proved that √2 (the square root of 2) is an irrational number.
401792
Every continuous function on a closed, bounded interval is Riemann integrable. The converse is false.
491814
Then f(π/2) = 2(1)(−1) − 0 = −2, so sin x and sin2x are linearly independent. ... So the Wronskian does not tell us whether the functions are linearly dependent or independent. Since the Wronskian is 0, let us first try to show that the functions are linearly dependent. We can get −2x2 from f by multiplying by −2.
469202
Proof that π is irrational. In the 1760s, Johann Heinrich Lambert proved that the number π (pi) is irrational: that is, it cannot be expressed as a fraction a/b, where a is an integer and b is a non-zero integer. ... In 1882, Ferdinand von Lindemann proved that π is not just irrational, but transcendental as well.