Anyone prefer these over the Remington T 72 glasses?
1647395
I haven't tried the T 72's, but when I researched eye, and ear protection equipment for the shooting range, all of the Howard Leight products had rave reviews. I've purchased 2 different ear protection products, and both the clear and amber lense glasses sold under the Howard Leight label and both products have performed flawlessly. The glasses fit very comfortably even tho they fit very close to your temples, but this provides a very tight fit for your hearing protection.
2010917
Not sure that all folks do !! However, wider field of view on these means you can find your target quicker; plus less collimation issues here (why I'm not sure) means better and more reliable focus; plus these can be hand-held longer with less wobble due to relatively lighter weight and lower magnification.
335522
I use them at our summer house where they take a lot of wear. We have a ful set and they have become our everyday glasses. However, they have clouded. A relative bought similar glasses at KMART at a much lower price that wear just as well. In summary, they are fine sturdy everyday glasses.
1134787
They are not heavy for the class of optic. I like them, they fit in a rain coat pocket or on a padded strap. If weights an issue try one of the "chest-rigs", they distribute the weight well. It helps me as I had neck surgeries. They a good for the money.
112624
I had a bad experience with truglo tfos on my springfield xds. It shot VERY low (2.5" at only 10') and sights weren't adjustable. I got so fed up I put on Trijicons and threw the TruGlos in a drawer. I love the Trijicons... Spot on to mfr specs, very visible, and so far totally durable. Of course, I've only had them for two months. But love them so far!!
1422066
I remember comparing the 2 but to me did notice glass difference to the point where I would spend the cash on the burris but people do like that scope a lot. I did notice different quality in glass when looking at the leupold 1-4 but it did not have a red dot.
267380
Yes, however these glass produce a double image when in use. I had thought that since these were rechargeable it would make since to get a couple of pairs. From personal experience I would stick with the manufacture of the t.v for your glasses. There may be better rechargeable glasses out there but these I would stay away from.
286387
Yes. I have both. The 8 moa is much easier to acquire. I had a detached retina in my master eye which seriously impaired my vision in that eye. The other eye is 20/15 corrected. I can still shoot with both eyes open because of red dot sights like the Fastfire III.
386976
I wear glasses and have used several pair of binos over the last few years while hunting. These are the best so far for keeping the glasses in place (and I have blended trifocals).
15621
I don't personally wear glasses but my father I law wears them and he uses a range finder just fine.
1358758
I haven't used the sony w800 bit these are the best I have used. Although I think my favorite part is the frame. They feel like real glasses and not some cheap disposable plastic glasses. They also hold up well I've bought 3 pairs and have 2 left...the third ended up at a friends house.
1943521
Our advice if you're interested in something along these lines? Go to the Gunnar Optik site and create a pair of glasses with the features you want, and check out the price. Then go to a local optometrist and see if they can beat the price with the same set of features. Buy whichever is cheaper. If you cant afford either try the Gamma Rays
110371
Actually, I did sell my 12-60 to help pay for this lens -- they're about comparable w.r.t. image quality. The 12-40 doesn't have as wide a range of focal lengths, but is optically faster. I've also heard about a couple of examples of this lens having structural issues. But mine is holding up nicely, even in spite of a bit of accidentally rough treatment (I slipped on a muddy slope and landed on the lens).
289722
the reason I bought them here is because I could find them at my eye doctor. But I can tell you this, I used these over my prescription glasses during a 9 hour gun course on a sunny day and did not squint once. They kept my vision sharp and clear. Also, since these glasses protect your eyes on all sides, you do not have to be concerned about empty shells hitting your eyes from another gun being fired next to you if you are in a gun training class.
923931
Diamax. I use all my Longchamp glasses every day, not just for special occasions as they are both decorative and sturdy. I honestly couldn't say whether they are different from the older ones.
1126187
No they are the perfect size for a medium face. What I find is that I can't see quite as clearly as I can with my $$$$$ glasses.
747877
I really like the GR 801's. They're very flexible as long as you treat them with respect they do great. For the price I don't think you can beat them. I'm probably going to order a few more pairs just to keep around in case something happens ones that I have. I like them that much. They aren't really heavy or anything. They look good. And the lenses themselves aren't an obnoxious amber color. I have several pairs of firing range glasses and if I wanted to wear those, I'd wear those. The actual tint on the GR's is subtle but the perfect amount in my opinion and experience. I had severely burning eyes periodically and headaches before I bought these. After three days of wearing them that all started going away. Five days in completely gone. I wear them all the time now.