Is the Tunze Osmolator Universal 3155 just a fancier model than the 3152? I see it's about 100.00 more. I have 16g nano.
1620332
3155 is for a larger aquarium replacement rate is more and cutoff is suited for a larger tank. I had the same size tank as you and the 3152 is awesome for that size.
1620333
The 3155 has an extra sensor and multiple mounting options. For your nano I'd go with the 3152
1620334
The 3155 has an upgraded display and an optical sensor also, you can use either on a 16 gal but the 3152 is better suited for your size tank.
283869
I have both of these humidifiers. They are essentially the same except for a slightly different design. I like the U-31001 better because it's easier to fill. In order to fill them, you have to take the tank off of the unit and turn the tank upside down. With the U-31002, it doesn't lie flat when you do this, so you have to hold/balance the tank with one hand while you fill it with the other. With the U-31001, you just set the tank down because it lies flat to fill it - so it's easier to fill. The U-31001 also has a more adjustable nozzle, so you have more control over where to aim the mist. Other than that, they are pretty identical in form and function.
331845
Thank you very much, after reading both reviews, I was wondering the exact same thing. Since essentially they are the same, i will purchase the less expensive. Thanks again
570478
I'm not sure about the Max flo but the supper pump 1 1/2 is not as powerful as a standerd 1 1/2hp pump. You need to know your gpm needs. The super is a little small for a 28k gallon pool so runs for 16 hours a day. Still saves about 30$ a munth
1706377
R. Heffron the pump I used was the Tom Pump for $15 . The pump works great and is inexpensive. The truth of the matter is the JBJ ATO is truly garbage. It has a manufacturers defect and fails constantly within an hour of use its already failing to come on...I found out on a reef column that you must BREAK the saudered connection between the timer and the JBJ brain for it to stop interrupting it from working...so in essence you must break an absolute new product you paid full price for, so it can work...it's garbage but I made it work because I had no choice. I advise you to use the "TUNZEE OSMOLATOR ATO SYSYEM " it's awesome and fail safe with a sensor type set up. .U can still use the TOM pump as your dosing pump....good luck R. HEFFRON I hope my insight will help you. Don't buy the JBJ ATO for $50 more you buy a tested good quality product in the TUNZEE ATO SYSTEM
140190
After a lot of research I decided on this over the Medela and am glad I did. I exclusively pump and love the spectra. I can't think of one thing I dislike about it and in fact I also recently bought the spectra M1 for travel and for when I am out at someone's house. If you have any other questions feel free to email me at lovenest@live.ca
966381
One reviewer states if you are replacing a Nuwave, you will not be satisfied. My experience is different. I have both, and I have had the Oyoma longer. The Nuwave is already looking shabby after just a few months. The Oyama still looks new. Both still work, and both have different construction designs. The Oyama is superior in quality and versatility, but the Nuwave has some pluses like the rack is a bit better. But on the Nuwave the drip pan now looks like an old pealed teflon pan. For your best bet, Oyama is my choice were I to choose between them. Price and durability, ease of control and heat distrabution are superior in the glass bowl model over the plastic model any day. One reviewer states if you are replacing a Nuwave, you will not be satisfied. My experience is different. I have both, and I have had the Oyoma longer. The Nuwave is already looking shabby after just a few months. The Oyama still looks new. Both still work, and both have different construction designs. The Oyama is superior in quality and versatility, but the Nuwave has some pluses like the rack is a bit better. But on the Nuwave the drip pan now looks like an old pealed teflon pan. For your best bet, Oyama is my choice were I to choose between them. Price and durability, ease of control... » Read More One reviewer states if you are replacing a Nuwave, you will not be satisfied. My experience is different. I have both, and I have had the Oyoma longer. The Nuwave is already looking shabby after just a few months. The Oyama still looks new. Both still work, and both have different construction designs. The Oyama is superior in quality and versatility, but the Nuwave has some pluses like the rack is a bit better. But on the Nuwave the drip pan now looks like an old pealed teflon pan. For your best bet, Oyama is my choice were I to choose between them. Price and durability, ease of control and heat distrabution are superior in the glass bowl model over the plastic model any day. « Show Less
1073074
Thank you for your input. I was trying to find out if the ss780pc was an upgrade or not, and you answered that question. I personally would purchase the ss780pc due to the fact that it has twice as many k-cups (at least $25 value) plus the additional water filters. You'd save money in the long run by spending the additional $10.
981907
Haven't used the "20" so, the only difference I can see is the grey PVC siphon tube and a "beefed up" vacuum chamber. We like these pumps. Only complaint is the discharge tube. We live in the desert and the sun destroys the discharge tube and they don't make replacements for these models. We wrapped the tube with vinyl tape to protect it. Don't know that there is $2-$3 difference in the two pumps but, we just went with the "30" model.
86728
I have both the isi and the Molecular-R whip siphons and they both do a great job. I've used them to make various whipped creams and for molecular gastronomy recipes. I use it the most often for instant infusions for cocktails. And both brands do an equally good job at all of these tasks.The biggest plus to the isi is that most of its parts are dishwasher safe. The canister, the top, and the difuser can all go in the dishwasher, which makes cleanup a lot easier. Also I don't think you can get a 1 liter version of the Molecular-R, though I almost never meed the 1 liter version and it takes more CO2 canisters to user. The 0.5 liter size is the most useful in either brand, in my opinion. I have both the isi and the Molecular-R whip siphons and they both do a great job. I've used them to make various whipped creams and for molecular gastronomy recipes. I use it the most often for instant infusions for cocktails. And both brands do an equally good job at all of these tasks.The biggest plus to the isi is that most of its parts are dishwasher safe. The canister, the top, and the difuser can all go in the dishwasher, which makes cleanup a lot easier. Also I don't think you can get a 1 liter version of the Molecular-R, though I almost never meed the 1... » Read More I have both the isi and the Molecular-R whip siphons and they both do a great job. I've used them to make various whipped creams and for molecular gastronomy recipes. I use it the most often for instant infusions for cocktails. And both brands do an equally good job at all of these tasks.The biggest plus to the isi is that most of its parts are dishwasher safe. The canister, the top, and the difuser can all go in the dishwasher, which makes cleanup a lot easier. Also I don't think you can get a 1 liter version of the Molecular-R, though I almost never meed the 1 liter version and it takes more CO2 canisters to user. The 0.5 liter size is the most useful in either brand, in my opinion. « Show Less
570477
I have the same question, this pump cost a little more than the Max-Flo and w/o a timer. But I guess mainly, is it a better pump?
2204190
U429085 is better quality and thicker. It is also more expensive. The difference is not really noticeable to me as I've bought both. But some reviewers note there is less humidity with food staying good longer.
1968233
To save yourself some time, just call up your local water softener company and ask if they sell medium. It saved me some shipping, and supported a local company. It just happened that they had the Ionac C249, which I put in my Kenmore.
996613
I have only used the ones provided. I haven't found an adaptor wide enough to use any other bottle. The machine itself has mechanical issues though. Make sure you have a backup. I purchased this because I'm a FT student as well as working 12hr shifts. I need to pump 2-4 times a day and the display screen stopped working one day and some days I can't get the pump to power on without rotating it on its side. I have a friend that had to get the same pump replaced twice.
534844
This is smaller than the other aluminum iSi siphons that I have. It seems to work just as well, with the advantage that it doesn't develop any metallic taste in the water. I've found that to be an issue with the aluminum ones. I've had the stainless steel one for about a year now, and no metallic taste. On the negative side, it is smaller than the aluminum ones (at least the ones I have) so you don't get as much seltzer for each C02 cartridge.
2097753
I have the 870XL as well and use the Urnex Cafiza cleaning tablets. They work just as good as the ones that say Breville on them, and saved me a ton of money as well.
206876
The DM0600 is made by Jarden Consumer Solutions--New Sources of Growth according to the product details. It also comes with a "no-brainer" mixing tool aka a piece of plastic with measuring incriments on it that attaches to the top of the blender jar which the DM0500 does not have. I own the DM0500 and at the time I purchased it the DM0600 wasn't available for a cheaper price. It's a difference of about $25 and if I had to order again I would purchase the legitimately advertised margaritaville brand DM0500 however, all the reviews are in the 5 and 4 star range so it is possible the the DM0600 is a quality unit. Good luck with your purchase