Please compare the sony alpha 77 to the sony alpha 65 and make a recommendation please.
1617973
I really can't compare because I've never used the A65. I like the a77 and specifically like the weather sealed body. Camera takes great pictures when paired with a good lens.
1617974
Wow I never have Spoken to an actual goddess before. So I better get this right:)To be very honest I'm not sure of everything. But I know it has higher resolutions and more points of aim. The high speed shutter rate is faster. Reading some of the other reviews people have said that the motion tracking is much better on this one. But I've never used the 65.Hope it helps.
1617975
Wow I never have Spoken to an actual goddess before. So I better get this right:) To be very honest I'm not sure of everything. But I know it has higher resolutions and more points of aim. The high speed shutter rate is faster. Reading some of the other reviews people have said that the motion tracking is much better on this one. But I've never used the 65. Hope it helps.
1617976
The a77 is all around a more powerful camera. Advantages that I really enjoy are it being weather-sealed. And the flip out LCD screen. If you were to go with the a77 I would suggest looking at the a77 mark ii. It has slight improved specs all around.
1617977
The differences are The A65 has a plastic body vs a magnesium alloy plastic combo on the A77, The A77 shoots at 12fps vs 10 for the A65. A77 has a Max shutter speed of 1/8000th vs 1/4000th on the A65. The major differences are mostly cosmetic. If you go to www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonyslta65 you will find a listing of the differences. As far as a recommendation I think either camera is a good choice. Choosing will depend on budget and the features you need the most.
1617978
the a77 shoots at 11 frames but no focus and iris adjustment and the a77 2 has continues focus and iris adjustment at 12 frames per second i will trade my a77 for the model2
1324618
Yeah, I'd say their elements are in the same class. Both use ultra-low dispersion glass and produce superb images. I think the main difference is that the 17-55 has to use larger elements. Which increases the relative aperture and the price tag.
2185298
Hi, your Sony Alpha A77 is an A-mouth body type camera in which it is compatible with any Sony A-mouth lens such as SAL2875. It will work perfectly. -Ely
221387
Hi Monty, I would suggest DPReview www.dpreview.com I have included a link to your comparison: http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_em10&products=sony_a6000; Additionally, individual review on Amazon are usually true-to-form. Hope this helps.
359954
This is a great resource AnthonyB. I think the review clearly favors the Panasonic but I am biased ;-) I'm with you on the noise issue but all else aside the improvement over the first generation is remarkable. I especially like the macro modes. Much better (see my review).
50325
Actually A620 vs. SD700 is like apples and oranges. A few differences are resolution (8mp vs. 6mp), body type (pro-style vs. pocket style), and LCD type(flip and swivel vs. stationary). There are many more differences but these are some of the main ones.
565898
Get the Sony 18-55mm. It's better. The best replacement is the 16-50mm 2.8 if you can afford it. It's better than many primes.
1606324
Susan, I found a comparison at this site: http://2reviewed.com/samsung-dp700a3b-a02us-vs-samsung-dp700a3d-a01us-review/ Hope this helps Guy
1711317
TeeVoo thanks for the explanation. I just picked up the a950 at best buy for $3600 and no interest for 3 years. My Best Buy was even giving premium home delivery and setup for free on it as well. I compared the two tvs. There is just something about the a950's picture that makes you go "wow." The only wow factor I received from the new LEDs was how thin they were. At the end of the day, I watch what's on the screen and not how thin the actual tv set is so I went with the a950.
824025
NO hooks right up to the A65 and the 65 and 77 have the same shoe.Yes buy the Sony Metz version
105271
Thanks, M. That certainly is very helpful information. I haven't made up my mind yet, although I'm leaning towards the SD750 for its compactness (looking for something to carry all the time, since I already have the A640 for 'picture occasions' or travel - really great for simple pns, particularly the rotating LCD, but somewhat bulky). I will have to check out the LCD to see if I can tolerate the grainy images though.
1866472
Hi, this Sony A-mount lens SAL1650 can be use to any Sony A-mount camera type body such as your Sony Alpha A65. -Ely
221389
Hi Monty, I would suggest DPReview www.dpreview.com I have included a link to your comparison: http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_em10&products;=sony_a6000; Additionally, individual review on Amazon are usually true-to-form. Hope this helps.
660356
It should as they are both Sony Alphas. Mine continues to function very well.
1900006
Yes the A1 has better sound, if you don't need the battery then go with the A1, but the A3 still has great sound
692772
Don't know about A65, but it works on my A77 perfectly. These cameras are very similar and I would expect it would. Check out the corresponding OEM Sony product and see if they list their same product for both units.
392657
Agree w/ comments below. Buy a current model. I picked up a Sony after my Samsung crashed for about $105