MP 830 v. MP 780 Can anyone help with salient differences between them? The MP830 may be too new to know, but wondering why this might be the better machine. Can you replace print catridges indivually? Thanks MP 830 v. MP 780 Can anyone help with salient differences between them? The MP830 may be too new to know, but wondering why this might be the better machine. Can you replace print catridges... » Read More MP 830 v. MP 780 Can anyone help with salient differences between them? The MP830 may be too new to know, but wondering why this might be the better machine. Can you replace print catridges indivually? Thanks « Show Less
1641805
In addition to what others have mentioned, the MP830 prints all documents faster than the MP780. The Mp830 includes a camera card reader and a colour display.The cartridges on the MP830 are chipped, making it much harder for third party ink companies to produce refilled ink cartridges.
1641806
Does anyone know how many Black and White pages you can print per B&W; cartridge with the MP830?
1171803
This machine does 2-side scans (I don't think the 780 does). It also uses the new UV inks (BCI8 series). You can replace each tank individually, but the inks cost a bit more than the 780's inks. The 780 is the old model and is no longer made (but you can still get them from various stores until they run out). If you already have the 780 it's probably not worth the upgrade unless you have a specific need for the new inks or dual scanning.
1641807
Go Canon's site and select Products. Next select Printers. http://consumer.usa.canon.com/Place check marks next to both printers and select "Compare Now". You will see the features of each. (I tried to insert a link to the page but Amazon cut it off.)I purchased the 830 due to the print resolution in color. 9600x2480 DPI - That is double the resolution of the 780. If printing in B and W the resolutions are the same. The price is 50 dollars more for the 830. Canon will make more money from the sale of ink.
1365668
Bottom line I like the 3640 a lot more than the 3540(which dates back to the 840 and 845 - which I owned) Some times I do a lot of printing - other times the printer sits. The 3640 has different print head technology that differs from the previous 3 mentioned above. So far I am not finding any need to clean print heads on the 3640 which as u know wastes a lot of ink. I found that to be more of an issue on previous generations. The imput panel is superior with real keys as opposed to all touch panel. I reall like it a better and it appears to be a little more economical (just a feeling) I find myself the most pleased with this model - go onto Epson's site - they did change and improve the print head technology. Hope this helps. Feature wise they are very similar.
788551
I was wondering the same thing so did some digging and found this in one of the reviews "The main difference of the MP640 over the MP560 is a larger 3" LCD, Ethernet connection and print speed."
1764474
I have both the 3540 (work) and the 3530 (home). The only difference that I really noted was that the 3540 has a larger interface display panel and all functions are accessed through the touchscreen interface panel. The 3530 has a smaller display panel and touch panel buttons that are used to access the printer's features (there is a number pad and arrows on the 3530 that you use to choose options, whereas on the 3540 you touch items on the display itself). Otherwise they appear to work the same and quite well. I am very pleased with them and would recommend either. As for the cost difference, I don't know. When I purchased them, the 3540 cost more than the 3530.
1728833
I still don't know whether the old problem has been corrected on any of the newer canon models. I ultimately decided to get a 700 for the office, since I need best-quality text printing for my professional correspondence. My old 600 and 610 I'd bought hoping to get good-quality scans, and frankly was somewhat disappointed. Since I rarely print photos, but very much want to be able to digitize old terrific family and travel photographs, I bought a dedicated Canon scanner which is FABULOUS for my partner (CanonScan 8800F). Consumer Reports rated the 700 the only printer with excellent quality printing, and that was of foremost importance for me. I still don't know whether the old problem has been corrected on any of the newer canon models. I ultimately decided to get a 700 for the office, since I need best-quality text printing for my professional correspondence. My old 600 and 610 I'd bought hoping to get good-quality scans, and frankly was somewhat disappointed. Since I rarely print photos, but very much want to be able to digitize old terrific family and travel photographs, I bought a dedicated Canon scanner which is FABULOUS for my partner (CanonScan 8800F). Consumer Reports rated the 700 the only printer with excellent quality... » Read More I still don't know whether the old problem has been corrected on any of the newer canon models. I ultimately decided to get a 700 for the office, since I need best-quality text printing for my professional correspondence. My old 600 and 610 I'd bought hoping to get good-quality scans, and frankly was somewhat disappointed. Since I rarely print photos, but very much want to be able to digitize old terrific family and travel photographs, I bought a dedicated Canon scanner which is FABULOUS for my partner (CanonScan 8800F). Consumer Reports rated the 700 the only printer with excellent quality printing, and that was of foremost importance for me. « Show Less
632942
The auto document feeder now duplexs its copies (can automatically copy both sides of a sheet) on the MP830. And there's a significant improvement when printing graphics and photos due to the higher resolution on the MP830. The display is in colour on the MP830, and you can preview your photos on the display. There's also a card reader in the MP830. And finally, the MP830 prints all documents faster than the MP780.The MP830 does use different inks; the chipped ink cartridge makes it hard to refill (but not impossible; doing so will increase the likelyhood of voiding your warranty).
1118512
>For some low end printers, it's almost cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy replacement cartridges.Exactly, I just bought the MX860 and will test it against HP C7280 (both brand new still in box). Problem is that I can't find third-party toner for the MX860. Those CLI-221 are availible only without chips and I am worried that to some design and patent scheme that will not change. I am guessing that replacing a full set of toner twice will be more than the initial printer cost. For HP I can find descent (according to some reviews) third-party toner. Yet I am guessing the MX860 is a better machine...I'll have some decisions to make. >For some low end printers, it's almost cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy replacement cartridges.Exactly, I just bought the MX860 and will test it against HP C7280 (both brand new still in box). Problem is that I can't find third-party toner for the MX860. Those CLI-221 are availible only without chips and I am worried that to some design and patent scheme that will not change. I am guessing that replacing a full set of toner twice will be more than the initial printer cost. For HP I can find descent (according to some reviews) third-party toner. Yet I am guessing the... » Read More >For some low end printers, it's almost cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy replacement cartridges.Exactly, I just bought the MX860 and will test it against HP C7280 (both brand new still in box). Problem is that I can't find third-party toner for the MX860. Those CLI-221 are availible only without chips and I am worried that to some design and patent scheme that will not change. I am guessing that replacing a full set of toner twice will be more than the initial printer cost. For HP I can find descent (according to some reviews) third-party toner. Yet I am guessing the MX860 is a better machine...I'll have some decisions to make. « Show Less
422249
Absolutely ! I'm not sure if you mean in addition to it so you can choose between 1 or the other, or if you mean to replace the original one, but they are exactly the same and interchangeable. I have both installed on my printer, one is set as the default (I keep scrap paper in that one) and when I want something printed on good clean both sides paper I select the other one. But you can load one with long paper and one with short or whatever combination you want, and set which one you use for most jobs as the default, then change the "Preference" on a particular print job when needed. Absolutely ! I'm not sure if you mean in addition to it so you can choose between 1 or the other, or if you mean to replace the original one, but they are exactly the same and interchangeable. I have both installed on my printer, one is set as the default (I keep scrap paper in that one) and when I want something printed on good clean both sides paper I select the other one. But you can load one with long paper and one with short or whatever combination you want, and set which one you use for most jobs as the default, then change the "Preference" on a particular print job when... » Read More Absolutely ! I'm not sure if you mean in addition to it so you can choose between 1 or the other, or if you mean to replace the original one, but they are exactly the same and interchangeable. I have both installed on my printer, one is set as the default (I keep scrap paper in that one) and when I want something printed on good clean both sides paper I select the other one. But you can load one with long paper and one with short or whatever combination you want, and set which one you use for most jobs as the default, then change the "Preference" on a particular print job when needed. « Show Less
353142
I've not printed with the iP1000 but the Canon Pixma mx860 doesn't quite print photos as well as the HP Photosmart. I'm a little disappointed in the quality of the colors, I expected better from Canon. While the photos themselves are sharper and less washed out than the HP, the color in the final print doesn't match the screen and doesn't pop as much as the HP; I expect far better quality from a company that produces such excellent photography equipment. Although I suppose it would suffice if you don't print many photos or care to hang any of them on the wall.
663330
I haven't used the other, so I say which is better. I can say that my printer is still working wonderfully.
2179417
Hello Thank you for sending me your query. One thing. I ordered this Catridge from AMAZON.COM as spare catridge. Still I am using the original catridge which came with the printer. Before buying it, I saw reviews in
1750812
Joaquin, I have the Canon MP-280 and these are the replacement cartridges that I ordered and am presently using for mine. I'm getting ready to reorder the same ones, as my color cartridge is now empty. I purchased the cartridges in December, and I use my printer almost every day to print documents, recipes, etc...I realize that it's almost been a year since you posted your question, but I thought that it might help someone else that may possibly have this same question.
1157870
The one I had (has since been thrown away) always had a slow printing/copying speed. I am not a techi-person, but it sounds like it is inherent in this particular make/model. I also had a problem with the print heads which would have been more costly to replace than to just get a whole new unit (which I originally paid big bucks for) so I ultimately just threw it out, sad to say. I had high hopes for this unit, but like so many things like this, they often disappoint. And, it was not overly used or abused either. Sorry I can't tell you more.
855028
Since I really dislike the printshop 3.0 I haven't really looked into buying another version. The old version I had (I think it was 6.0 but back in the 90's and it was GREAT but not compatible with my newer computer). 3.0 is a big waste of money as you can see from the reviews.
490391
However I would recommend getting an mk808 instead. I have both and the performance is WAY better on the 808, definitely worth the extra $10 even if you're only using it for powerpoint. Mk808: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B009OX22B4/ref=pd_aw_sims_e_15
847857
MME says:Epson V 500, versus V 700 or V 750. I have a large number of photos from the late 1800, some very faded, others in quite good condition. Also size of photos varies a lot, from small to quite large. Have some slides as well. My main goal is to save and upgrade quality of old photographs, many of which I will be using in a book. My question, is the Epson V500 sufficient, or should I go for the V 700 or V750?
234624
Well being in the same boat as you. I have found out a couple of things about each of the printers. I own an older Epson, so most of the problems I have had have been Ink (drying/clogging) issues. So from the reviews that is still a problem with newer Epson, however If you print more than one picture a month it is probably not a problem. The Canon (again reading the reviews) seems to be very good, but has some quality issues (may break within a couple of weeks). That being said, I would still go with the Canon, only I would buy it from Best Buy with their electronics agreement (repair or replace with new). The Canon and Epson warranties will also repair or replace with a refurbished unit. My 2 pennies. Of course the Best Buy thing would work for the Epson as well.