Do both USB 3.0 connect with internal headers? Or is one a pass-through?
1609886
I know older models had a cable pass through to a back USB 3.0 port for that. I know there is a version that requires on-board USB headers for USB 3.0. This one? From one of the reviews, it looks like it has the internal headers. I'd like to know for certain though.
160037
Manual says USB ports are only for mouse and memstick (for video copy only). So, it has to be internal.
1016769
I have used two of my USB 3.0 ports to use it. One for power the other for data.
134379
I was pleasantly surprised that mine came with an internal USB 3.0 connector. I think the picture and description need to be updated. Mine was a flat black, not the glossy black shown here.
881312
I don't have your motherboard and if you have a manual it should list whether there is "onboard/internal usb 3.0 header" and this header is what you need to plug or connectthe cable attached to the usb 3.0 panel what you want to buy. Take a careful look at the cable, there is a 20-pin (actually 19 b/c 1 is dead) connector and this connector mustgo into the onboard of the motherboard. Typically at the rear of the board. If if you have that 19-pin connector then it is compatible.
1716339
The device is USB 3.0 equipped, so as long as (in the case of two separate enclosures) they're both connected via USB 3.0, yes. If you're asking whether it can copy between the drives in its own bays via USB 3.0,the answer is also "yes." USB 3.0 is backward-compatible with 2.0, so it will copy via either.
1473775
This plugs directly into the PCIe bus, you don't need to connect to any USB pins on the mother board. For the internal USB Port for connecting a USB hub on the front of the PC for example, I believe it had a standard USB connector, so you just used any normal USB cable.As for a 20-pin header, I also have no idea what you are referring to. USB pin headers that I'm familiar with have always been 3 or 4 pin.
2254977
Yes but throughput on USB 3.0 is still limited to about 40mbps due to the chipset used. I found the Transcend parts support bandwidth that matches the throughput of MSXD.
320810
An adapter is not supplied. I have no problem with the 3.0 USB connection. External power adapter port is available. Very happy with this drive.
1656627
You bet! USB 3.0 supports exponentially faster transfer rates, but it's also backwards compatible to work with 2.0 device connections.
398974
If you mean usb 3.0, then the answer is no. Check the specs for the various flash drives you're looking at, they should say whether they're 2.0 or 3.0...
214639
Sorry I never hooked up the internal USB port on this card. If the out side ports work then most likely the internal port is bad. If the external enclosure gets its power from the USB port and it will work on the out side port I would say its bad. Did you try some other USB device on the internal port? If it worked but will not work with the external enclosure then it means it does not have the right connection to supply power to the enclosure.
1331715
yea, but their are no usb 3.0 headers on the motherboard, I don't recommend it
1716340
The device is USB 3.0 equipped, so as long as (in the case of two separate enclosures) they're both connected via USB 3.0, yes. If you're asking whether it can copy between the drives in its own bays via USB 3.0,the answer is also "yes."USB 3.0 is backward-compatible with 2.0, so it will copy via either.
427540
I am using with esata connection but I will check if it works with USB 3.0 although max throughput will be USB 2.0 since port on unit is USB 2.0
842370
The box only mentions USB 2.0. I would guess a USB 3.0 should be ok, just won't get the 3.0's speed rate for data.
862130
Yes! I have USB 3.0 and 2.0 I really can't tell the difference between the two in speeds...