Compared to S350? Besides the 1GB of internal flash memory, how does this compare to the 350?
270898
The 550 has 7.1 analog outs (versus 2.0 on the 350) and can internally decode DTS-HD MA, the 350 cannot. If you are like me and do not have an HDMI receiver the 550 is the better choice as I can still get lossless audio through the analog outputs.
1894468
I have only had the 350, so can't compare with S1 or S" - but I think they are all very much alike. I have been very pleased with the 350, with the pumping and the cleaning of it.
121029
I prefer the 32gb Sandisk Extreme SD HC1. At 45MB's a second it's plenty fast.
42860
Very nicely done review.... But I think I'll wait for the next version before a purchase. I bet it will have a SD memory chip slot. Meanwhile, my new Canon A560 digicam ($130.00) has the latest SDHC slot which will allow for rather extended length videos when using a high capacity card (4-8 GB). Not quite as convenient as the Flip, however.
948117
Hello, Tony. The S5's Micro SD card slot supports up to 64GB of added storage. This is helpful for storing photos, music and hopefully storing the 4k video that the Galaxy S5 is capable of shooting. So, yes. This card is fine. Keep in mind though that Samsung and Google (Android), updated the OS to KitKat and there are new found issues with utilizing the SD card the way we are so accustomed to. You should read the forums on KITKAT and SD cards. You will understand what I am trying to convey here. Cheers!
1015134
it is a 256GB ... as stated in the description. the "newer model" that they say exists is in fact a 128GB, which is about the only main difference between the two. This S5-391-9880 is definitely the better deal. This 256GB drive should last me for a good while. Remember also, that as drives get more full, their efficiency (speed) decreases, so it's always good to have lots of headroom on your drive.I love my laptop!!! only wish it had back-lit keys, since I tend to use it a lot in the dark, while watching TV.
764884
the $400 list price is some idiot.. the S350 is no longer supported and so it won't be listed at regular retail prices. you could try finding it cheaper than the S360 on ebay, although the S360 might be the better deal now unless you want the blue foil front of the 350.
2284472
I'm running the same research and here's the comparison, WX1: in addition to the HD video, its 24mm wide angle is precious in daily shootings (indoors, group pics, ...). It also has 5x zoom. And the CMOS sensor is supposed to be a notch better than CCD. The build quality is good and it's smaller than S90 except the thickness. It's also $100+ cheaper than S90. Battery life is rated at 350 shots v. S90's 220. S90: Manual everything; RAW; F2@28mm; SDHC card; external flash. The DSLR advantages have been the interchangeability for lens and flash. S90 takes another bite on those claims while providing the convenience and accessibility. If you're going up from Point&Shoot, WX1 is the winner; If you're going down from DSLR after the form factor, you'll miss less features with S90. Either is a great camera that will take wonderful pictures in the right hands.
105267
I'm also trying to decide between the SD850 and SD750...I prefer the S850 features, but this camera is so much thicker (1.04" vs 0.77"), and I was looking for a thin camera. The dimensions are on Canon's website...have you physically seen the two cameras and can you confirm the difference in thickness? I was curious that you did not mention...perhaps it's not as different as I think?
1887673
$300+ price difference between SD1400 and S90 or S95. I'll stick with SD1400 for my usage.
1940166
I am very happy with my 2GB Sansa. Just updated the firmware (very smooth application downloaded from Sandisk site).Sleek design, not as cool as Nano, but very close. Ubercool video which Nano doesn't have, which works surprisingly well.Bigger screen than Nano too. Micro SD slot a great plus. And it also works like a storage device, so you can take files with it, something Nano doesn't do.Go for the $129 (at time of writing) 4GB model.
407967
The 128GB is slower than the 256GB+ due to the way the controllers store the data. Basically the controllers write to multiple memory modules simultaneously and the 128GB model has fewer of them so it is somewhat slower. the Samsung Evo is probably a better bet if you are looking at the 128GB model as it is only a little more expensive and much faster (though still not quite as fast as the 256gb Pro).
544135
I have not had any problems with my flash or camera I have the S3 if that has baring on your decision - I have noticed a slight decline in length of charge but still well worth the money and I'm still very happy with the battery!!
241955
The 350 and 550 are almost identical except for 7.1 audio (550) and 1GB of internal storage (550). That's it. So the 350 isn't obsolete, it just has a few less features.
1621826
I bought it. I also did the 16GB card. Value for money is just too good. Love the form factor.
1257208
You would not get a good answer, here of all places with so many opinionated people.Only recommendation I can give is try both cameras in store and see which once you find comfortable to use. Both are great cameras. And really similar in performance. Can't go wrong either way.I've heard/read that Lumix is slightly better. But I have the S90 and I can't imagine how any P&S; can be better than it (aside from S95/S100) in the same category. I love the controls on it especially the customizable ring.
455938
My S2IS purchased at Amazon.com came with a Kingston 1GB card, so slow it's not speed-rated, I'm guessing 5X or so. But it still records OK, at 30 fps 640x480 with 16-bit uncompressed wav STEREO, just like the S3. It's just a pain to offload the files to computers. 1GB is enough for 9 minutes, so I suppose any 10x, 20x, rated cards should work.