Did anyone find a Size Guide for these pants?
545913
No guide. They run true to size but long which is ok because they shrink. The fit is comfortable not sleek. Very soft. No pockets.
545914
I didn't look for one - if it's any help- I'm 5'8 and 200# - 33" inseam - thes fit great - not tight - very comfortable - I bought an XL.
840877
This link includes a sizing chart http://www.sierratradingpost.com/white-sierra-teton-convertible-trail-pants-upf-30-zip-off-legs-for-women~p~5376n/?filterString=s~white-sierra-women%2F&colorFamily;=02. You may also find specific instructions on taking measurements. I used the sizing chart to order these for my wife. She says they they fit perfectly, however, I can not speak for the experiences of others'.
510582
I believe I ordered the same size as underwear. I might have found a size chart there?
106458
I found a size guide at http://www.socksaddict.com/913-Drymax-Lite-Trail-Running-1-4-Crew-Socks.aspx
824687
I did a search online and found the size scale somewhere, but i dont know the specific site. Hope that helps.
313959
the sizing guide is here: http://darntough.com/customer-service/faqs#sizing I've found it to be pretty accurate
770324
Hi I have looked we don't have that size. I also looked at other sites and still can't find that size. Sorry Thank you for your communication texasvalue
826420
The size on the website seems to be medium. I don't remember where (or if) I saw that anywhere before I ordered them. Sorry to not be more helpful. I might have checked the Isotoner website to see how to determine size.
564109
There was an ordering guide and I used that. Sorry I don't remember all the size ranges. When I followed the guide, it fit fine.
1265334
sorry cant help you they fit my wife and myself just fine but, again, I cant speak to sizes since there isn't one that I saw. you can contact the mfg though
770323
HiI have looked we don't have that size. I also looked at other sites and still can't find that size.SorryThank you for your communicationtexasvalue
1239141
I always used Rothco's size chart, and it always fit just fine, so I saved it to my google drive as a reference.. but keep in mind that each propper pants size support a range of measures, so choose wisely to avoid buying a little larger pants than you really are. here is the link: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxDWRBNcj2SQcEQ5WU5yUTg4VWs/edit?usp=docslist_api
1002160
They really don't give information about sizing, and it's a crap shoot as to whether they'll fit. Mine did, but only after tightening them up with bungee cords. Caveat Emptor.
1463196
I usually wear 33x32 pants and Large is perfect. Not tight around the waist, and legs are 1/16" above the ground. They do have an adjustable drawstring, so sizes should be somewhat flexible!
932244
The specs are on tru-specs web page, I have the large long, but they are too big, if your interested I'll make a deal for them cause I can't wear them, the waist is too small, anton2129@aol.com
208047
I am an 8 in pants normally and my mom measured me off of their measuring chart(different website, different pants, same brand) and thought I was a 34, got them and were SO big on me. Sent them back and from these comments it looks like I would be a 30.Got full refund and will be getting a 30, even though they were super baggy, they were sosososo comfy.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less