ES8249s or the ES8109S? Has anyone used both and prefiers one over the other?
1629764
I know this is much later than the original post, but in case anyone else is wondering the same I thought I'd answer it. I tried both, and ended up sticking with the ES8249S. However, there is not much of a difference at all. They have the same volume when shaving, they have the same comfort level, same close shave, the cleaner unit is the same, the display on the razor is the same.... The only difference is the 4th blade. I do think because of that the 8249S is just a bit quicker to shave my whole face, but it was not much of a difference at all. They were priced the same after Christmas due to steep Amazon price cuts and a 20 dollar rebate, so I got a great deal on the 8249S, otherwise I'd be perfectly fine with the ES8109S for a cheaper price.
861655
The proxxon is quieter then the competition that I have used but I haven't used the one you mention. Also, you mention cordless...there is a big difference between cordless and A/C corded units.
929303
Depend s on what your using them for...the es20 n 30 are bigger speakers and are mostly used for fronts...i think they would be over kill for surrounds. But the es10 are nice n slim and don't take up much room...they could be used for either fronts as they have the power n are 3 ways or they could be kick ass surrounds. They have a good freq rage as well. You can't beat the price either way you want to use them. Hope this helps
1171678
I have been using a CS 10 off and on for about ten months. I have not used a PC or any other device---I have used the three presets---mostly #2 for general use and #3 when I want to hear a full range of sounds when listening to music. I really find it useful when watching TV with my wife-----Without the CS 10, I have to have the volume up loud to hear which makes it uncomfortable for anyone else listening.I am a mechanic/farmer by trade. I have not used the CS
1208315
Samsquared said it best you will probably need both, if not on this project another one. I have both and they both work great.
2184288
ispring tds-3 is of better value as it has temperature compensation feature. The results have always been consistent for me.
1188874
I have used the DS330 but have also been in the first or second row, with great results. Jim
498976
Hi, Tim,I am only familiar with the ES8109 and it works well. I do not know anything about the ES-LA63; however, Panasonic might have a compatibility chart or the maker of this replacement may have the same. A call to Panasonic would not hurt either. Good Luck, John
145703
I have bought both and both have worked. Not sure of the technical differences.
810607
I am in the same boat. I found that the 1200 is the "newest" model of it... And don't like it. The 1400 looks slick, but doesn't have too good of reviews. Did you find anything since then? I see you posted in Jan. :)
2078734
I don't think you could go wrong with either one. I bought the Hobart 210 only because I'm usually financially embarrassed. I had a tough enough time reaching for the 210, let alone that upper shelf 211. But, the 211 is supposed to be the better machine. And, if you're just the typical homeowner, the Hobart 140 would most likely be all that you would ever need and at half the cost.
1256531
You are right. I purchased one and had to return it after I realized. Get the irad 230. I like it a lot. It is very discrete. I use it often with just audio and works fine.
487411
yes I have used both. FACTOR 2 delivers even more than the original! Very good product.
880065
I've used both and they both work great. I can't really tell the difference between them.
2240628
I have both, as far as I can tell there is no difference. They both work the same. Buy whichever cost less. I think it's more of a style thing...
1907393
There is no difference in functionality as far as I can tell. The only thing that I can think would be the difference would be the market in which the device was originally intended or perhaps the year it was manufactured, but I could not even find the 400l on casio's website when I was looking at purchasing mine. I purchased the 400l because it was significantly cheaper than the straight 400 model when I was looking. I would say pick up the cheaper of the two if you are trying to decide between the two. The one I purchased has worked magnificently, and has done the job I needed it to. I purchased mine to for use in my upper level math and electronics courses at school (University), the only caution I would take is to make sure that your school (assuming that is what you are buying it for) allows the use of CAS calculators. Some do not, and it would suck to purchase such an advanced calculator and not be able to use it on tests or in class.... Though I guess it would still make doing homework easier.
1383817
Heavier (4lbs v 3lbs 8oz)Platinum coating over the stainless steel50w higherholds .3 oz more waterMore advanced steam systemAnti Calc system (Their Focus model also has this, but the Professional does not)Electronic Temp Control (again Focus has it, but Pro does not)I would recommend the Focus model for the $$ savings and similar features to the Advancer. It's cheaper than the pro even.