what's the furthest someone has tested the 1w version? 3w, 2w, and 1w versions all say the effective range is 1000 which i know can't be true
1615935
I have the 1 watt and have tested it to 2000' clear line of sight, only lost video when transmitter was driven around a bend. The only test I made thru walls was 30' and it transmitted thru aluminum garage door with no problem. Note that the video transmission mode does introduce slight video degradation with some flickering.
1615936
Since they did not meet my need to make speakers wireless without a lot of hiss in the signal I did not test their range. Sorry.
1510062
I have th5 5GHz network broken out from the 2.4. I use the 5GHz for backhaul and I have it point-to-point just over 1/4 mile, but this is not usable spectrum as its only backhaul. The 2.4 goes around 500 - 750 foot radius
2276149
The 1.5 was always amazingly optimistic for me. I have a tower so close I could hit it with a slingshot and the specs say best reception available. From http://testmy.net Download :: 4.6 Mbps 573 kB/s up arrow Upload :: 1.4 Mbps 175kb/s at 430 am when there is probably no other demand. When I was paying for 3x it would get approx 1.5.
1041073
I ordered two of these and one was v1.1 and the other was 1.2. The version 1.1 was defective so I sent it back. Version 1.2 works flawlessly, and I actually get better range than I was expecting. So I don't think they're is anyway to guarantee which version will be shipped to you.
1708248
This product uses 27 MHz wireless which has a maximum practical range of about 6 feet. I wish they made this point a lot more clear! You'd be better off getting 2.4GHz technology which should increase the range.
294345
The package of the ALFA 500mW and 1W are different. The 1W package has very simple words on it "AWUS036H, 802.11b/g, Long-Range USB Adapter". The 500mW package has many description on the box.
1099575
That is a bit of a tricky question...there is significant attenuation if the signal is going through walls etc...The specs claim 150 ft indoor or 450 ft outdoor wireless range without obstructions.Incidentally, I found that these cameras died due to moisture when placed outside, personally I would only use them in a controlled climate environment. Alternatively, opt for a higher quality camera. The other issue is that the link is not re-acquired if it drops. I would come back home to a black screen and have to power cycle the camera frequently...not good. The more expensive models will re-establish the link. That is a bit of a tricky question...there is significant attenuation if the signal is going through walls etc...The specs claim 150 ft indoor or 450 ft outdoor wireless range without obstructions.Incidentally, I found that these cameras died due to moisture when placed outside, personally I would only use them in a controlled climate environment. Alternatively, opt for a higher quality camera. The other issue is that the link is not re-acquired if it drops. I would come back home to a black screen and have to power cycle the camera frequently...not good. The more expensive... » Read More That is a bit of a tricky question...there is significant attenuation if the signal is going through walls etc...The specs claim 150 ft indoor or 450 ft outdoor wireless range without obstructions.Incidentally, I found that these cameras died due to moisture when placed outside, personally I would only use them in a controlled climate environment. Alternatively, opt for a higher quality camera. The other issue is that the link is not re-acquired if it drops. I would come back home to a black screen and have to power cycle the camera frequently...not good. The more expensive models will re-establish the link. « Show Less
839367
I don't know that Netgear gives maximum distances in feet; they say things such as "most powerful antennas", "best WiFi speed", and "Range for medium to large homes". My computer guy recommended this model, specifically. I found an article in PC Magazine Online; here's a link: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2381378,00.asp They discuss the Pros, Cons, and the Bottom LIne. There is a sectoin where several models (e.g., Cisco Linksys E4200, E3000, and the Netgear N600 Series) are compared by Throughput, in Mbps, at 5feet, 15 feet, and 30 feet. Also, there is a section for user comments. I can add that I found mine very easy to install, no CD, and it reaches everywhere in my cluttered house. I don't know that Netgear gives maximum distances in feet; they say things such as "most powerful antennas", "best WiFi speed", and "Range for medium to large homes". My computer guy recommended this model, specifically. I found an article in PC Magazine Online; here's a link: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2381378,00.asp They discuss the Pros, Cons, and the Bottom LIne. There is a sectoin where several models (e.g., Cisco Linksys E4200, E3000, and the Netgear N600 Series) are compared by Throughput, in Mbps, at 5feet, 15 feet, and 30 feet. Also,... » Read More I don't know that Netgear gives maximum distances in feet; they say things such as "most powerful antennas", "best WiFi speed", and "Range for medium to large homes". My computer guy recommended this model, specifically. I found an article in PC Magazine Online; here's a link: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2381378,00.asp They discuss the Pros, Cons, and the Bottom LIne. There is a sectoin where several models (e.g., Cisco Linksys E4200, E3000, and the Netgear N600 Series) are compared by Throughput, in Mbps, at 5feet, 15 feet, and 30 feet. Also, there is a section for user comments. I can add that I found mine very easy to install, no CD, and it reaches everywhere in my cluttered house. « Show Less
1303607
I wish you luck. The D-Link knocked out wireless on my laptop! I couldn't get that returned fast enough. The Cisco is powerful and goes from my second floor all the way to the basement. It has 60-70% signal strength down there. My only complaint is that it seems to reset periodically and you drop signal but only for less then a minute. You apparently can't make changes locally but have to do so in the cloud. I haven't changed anything yet so not sure how I will like this.
117246
The answer to that question depends on a lot on factors. Where well this router be located? Forgetting about the term "exact" when it comes to RF, your full effective range will be greater if this router is mounted in a wide open warehouse than in the basement of a 3 story home. That being said this is a nice quality router that you can load 3rd party firmware on (e.x. dd-wrt) and tweak tx pee settings to your liking.
970834
The quoted range is up to 1,000 feet. I have one sensor that is 800 feet from my house and a second the is 950 feet from my house. Both are operating and give indications as promised.
1786998
I use one with a distance of about 300 feet (about 100 meters) and barely have the required signal strength. Also, the output signal is weak at a distance of 15 feet in my house.
609242
I just got mine and it was 10.5w. I think originally it was 13w, but they have since improved it to be 10.5w to be competitive with others.And they have not updated the pictures, only the description.
1805077
You are correct. It's about 15 watts output. Range should not be greatly affected by the difference in output.
2245200
My kill-a-watt reader reads 7W at 122.5V, which is also in line with what other reviewers have mentioned, so, the 9W designation is correct, 13W is definitely out of line.
1502011
Kind of a vague question...I haven't had any issues as of yet. Range seems good, but that can depend on the WiFi source and how many others are connected.
436560
1amp or 1000 Ma is too weak with no headroom. What's your purpose? Is it a single! VxI=P