hello,whats the difference between this telescope and "Orion 8297" ???
1612543
The orion 8297 is a 8 inch while the Orion 8296 is a 10 inch mirror. The bigger the mirror, the more light of the object can be reflected back to the eye piece.
1449071
the 127 is a maksutov style telescope and the 130 is a reflecting one. maksutovs achieve the same power as longer reflectors without being as big.
940201
From the research I have done, this is a better quality telescope than the PowerSeeker. The Celestron PowerSeeker series comes with extras (such as the Barlow lens), but the quality of the Celestron AstroMaster series is superior; that is why the AstroMasters cost more and come with less. At this price ($49.95 including shipping), it is a good buy. Good bye.
1779087
Celestron 21061 AstroMaster 70 AZ Refractor Telescope Sold by Amazon.com LLC
2121602
Check this link out http://www.astronomyforum.net/celestron-nexstar-telescope-forum/134708-nexstar-slt-127-vs-5se-6se.html
179361
It will work well with any telescope with 1.25-inch lenses. According to the specifications for the Orion XT8 Classic, this will work. http://www.telescope.com/catalog/product.jsp?productId=102005&gclid;=CJDj45mbnL0CFfNxOgodQRMA_g
2116943
Don't know but I would strongly recommend the Celestron 10X42 Outland binoculars instead of the 8X42. The extra magnification with the wide 42 field of view is worth.
613056
First, which Meade 10 are you talking about. This is a Dobsonian style without a computer. It is a very good, inexpensive telescope. You need to direct it yourself, which means you have to know the sky, or be willing to learn it. If you are looking for quick an easy way to look at celestial objects without having to learn how to find them, a Schmidt-Cassagrain with a computerized guiding mount, while more expensive, is the way to go. Orion, Meade, Celestron are 3 of the biggest names in amateur astronomy (there are others.) All market both Dobsonians and Schmidt-Cassagrains and all make quality products, so brand preference is a personal thing.
1754727
The Edmund's AstroScan cannot be collimated, and it usually arrives in an uncollimated state. The StarBlast can be collimated by the user. In my experience with both, the StarBlast is far superior, even though the optical intentions for both instruments are identical. (FWIW, the AstroScan's eyepieces are better, but E.P.'s can be purchased separately.)(Some of the comments on Amazon mention the AstroScan, as do replies to the comments. Suggest you read these.)(Some of the comments on Amazon mention the AstroScan, as do replies to the comments. Suggest you read these.)
2210046
Bill, yours is a dud. Mine is rather accurate and isn't plagued by your technical issues. I can find galaxies that aren't visible to the naked eye with it quickly. That said, I actually don't own a Celestron telescope currently but instead those from other manufacturers. However, that isn't because I've experienced serious quality issues with Celestron scopes in the past.
1535202
there should be an owners manual. check the Orion website. Otherwise return it to Amazon and have them ship a replacement. I returned my first one and the replacement was perfect.
1535200
Sorry to hear about your owner's manual situation. The owner's manual contains a wealth of information which includes the assembly of the base, mounting the spotter scope, focus and care. Anyway, I've really enjoyed my telescope but would suggest wanting until Orion sends you a copy of the owners manual before proceeding. It will be worth the extra wait.
770255
I assume you are asking about the orion scope vs the celestron scope? I've no experience with the orion st, there's a comparison on cloudy nights' user forum. There is a lot of info there. I beive that is where I found a write up on what to expect from various size optics and focal lengths. I'm still happy with the astromaster. It has pretty good optics, but as many people have pointed out, the mount is a little flimsy.
1454107
This kind of mount is very convenient for simply hand tracking as you observe. The scope is not intended to be used for photography (which is a specialized task that is not for someone to just buy a telescope and start). The mount has teflon surfaces, and moves to your gentle pressures, fairly smoothly. If you know little about astronomy, but want a self-tracking telescope, try the Meade "lightswitch" series, which sees the stars and aligns itself, and even talks to you. it costs about 4 times as much of course. In bang for the buck, this Orion XT8 is terrific, but you will have to guide it. This kind of mount is very convenient for simply hand tracking as you observe. The scope is not intended to be used for photography (which is a specialized task that is not for someone to just buy a telescope and start). The mount has teflon surfaces, and moves to your gentle pressures, fairly smoothly. If you know little about astronomy, but want a self-tracking telescope, try the Meade "lightswitch" series, which sees the stars and aligns itself, and even talks to you. it costs about 4 times as much of course. In bang for the buck, this Orion XT8 is terrific, but you will have... » Read More This kind of mount is very convenient for simply hand tracking as you observe. The scope is not intended to be used for photography (which is a specialized task that is not for someone to just buy a telescope and start). The mount has teflon surfaces, and moves to your gentle pressures, fairly smoothly. If you know little about astronomy, but want a self-tracking telescope, try the Meade "lightswitch" series, which sees the stars and aligns itself, and even talks to you. it costs about 4 times as much of course. In bang for the buck, this Orion XT8 is terrific, but you will have to guide it. « Show Less
78396
Thank you for your response Darrell, this discussion board seems pretty much dead so I thought I would never get answered, but I did, and a great answer at that.I've been thinking about buying the Orion XT4.5 now, I'm aware the image will not be as great as the 8 inch but I'll still be able to see Saturn right? Would this be better than a refractor telescope? Sorry for all the questions! No more questions after this, I promise.
1186416
Hmmm... I don't remember. This is an entry-level, made in China telescope. It works well, but it's definitely for teenage kids. If you buy it, do get a moon filter for it- gives viewing a full moon so much more clarity!
1510210
It looks to be the same as Cosmos, but I also have the Celestron. It all depends on what you plan on really using it for!