Can you wire 2 of these as one each per channel? Or would that be too much bass?
1644127
Remember these are used in a system that is 2.1 channels. If you wish to use one for each channel you would simply need to create two 2-way or 3 way speakers in stereo with a crossover for each which separates out the frequency used by each speaker
826208
You have to either split one sub channel, or, preferably, use subs with line pass through capability. SVS SB13-Ultra comes to mind. This receiver sounds great. I returned a Denon x4000 and this is way better. It even sounds better than my Crown studio amps. And the room correction is way better than Audyssey Platinum's XT32 features.
583814
What you want to do is what this amp accommodates. You can use both inputs at the same time. I love mine.
1113241
You can get a cheap powered sub and just split the speaker signal to go straight to the sub. So, don't think you'd need anything extra except for some more speaker wire.
1865447
You can just buy two subs. That is perfectly fine for the wattage being brought out.
248331
I see no reason why that would be an issue. I am powering two of them plus the matching JBL center channel and two KEF rear speakers (they have the same specifications as the JBL) and a sub woofer from a 100 watt per channel Denon receiver.
59127
Absolutely id wire them in parallel. I have my two in a 4 cubic foot of tuned at 32hz ran with a hifonics Brutus 2000.1 wired at 2ohms and it impresses a lot of people. So you will love them especially with more power.
2122187
I do not think so. What you are planning to do can be risky for the amps if not done correctly and only one amp can be on at one time.
494899
If you have a separate pre-amp connect (1) Fiio A1 to let channel and the other to the right channel. You would get twice the power.Frank
1928857
The mixer has only 1 (each) L & R speaker out and an output for a subwoofer. If a splitter cable wouldn't degrade the signal, that might be an option for another pair of speakers.
510040
I assume you are trying to take one signal and send it to four different speakers. I would get something like the Behringer MX288 8 Channel mixer
487711
You can run them however you want but different orientations will sound different as the sound waves bounce around at different areas. I would experiment with the orientation if possible to find what you like best. You'll probably only be able to fit one but as long as it has enough power (I run 1250watts RMS to each of mine) then it should have plenty of bass and still be crystal clear.
348433
You will have to run them in series and wire them for 2 ohm because it wont push enuff watts for both subs at 4 ohms
1909423
You cannot do that. This module will work with only on subwoofer. Second sub demands another separate module.
2206346
You talkin bout L and R channel in a single output the answer is noActually for a single channel you can split it up plus it's great to split up ur subs output, microphones etc .. I use it to split my subs
490771
The only way this might work is to run the line to the passive sub into one of the speaker level inputs. Do not run the other speakers through the sub; the bass is already routed to the passive sub in your system.
1990676
the advice I found, and only after trying it with Bi-wired with my receiver, was unless you actually have two amps to power the speaker, wire it with the bridge in place via the single channel. You won't notice enough change with it bi-wired, and you only end up losing a pair of channels that you could otherwise use for rear surround or a second zone.