What is the differences between model SB67158, and the single antenna model SB67148??? Thanks!
1631027
The one with the two antenna is the main base and you only can have one. The one with the one antenna is the one that connect to the main base and you can have up to 8 of them.
1631028
German - SB67158 is the base model that interfaces with your phone lines. SB67148 is a deskset that links "cordlessly" to the SB67158 hase. Thanks!
1631029
I have the SB67158 and I think the only difference is the answering machine in the 158
1631030
The double antenna is the base, or master station. the other base stations are the one with just one. Just got it, hope I am correct. So far very nice. Well made.
1631031
SB67148 is just a wireless desktop extension so it does not need to be plugged to the phone outlet but to use it you need the base which is the SB67158. The SB67158 is the main phone base wired to the phone line that sends the wireless signal to the SB67148 or SB67108 (cordless handset).
869119
Sorry but I'm not know exactly the difference. I had this model and it works very well.
465251
It is a PL-259 plug - standard for these types antennas. If you're not sure (or need to know) what it looks like, you can do an online search for PL-259... They have some good up-close pictures of them...
2034840
Don't know the actual dB, but it's been my experience that the 7.5" antenna performs better (for me). I can hit a local repeater consistently with the 7.5", but not with the 14.5". It may be due to local atmospherics, or other factors over which I have no control. Bottom line is that I use the 7.5" more often. In a different area, I might have different results, but I haven't used the device outside of my local area. Having said that, both perform a lot better than the 'stock' antenna.
65317
Hi, Jennifer. This unit has 2 built-in antennas with DBI info shown below: Antenna1- 1.2dBi Antenna2- 1.0dBi
1329218
Hello,I installed mine over a year ago and it works amazing up here in the mountains even with a steel building. I have 5 bars on my phone through out my 7,000 sq ft structure. As I remember I had to call Wilson and ask which antenna would be best for my system. I purchased whatever they told me to get...and it works awesome. If you are wondering...definitely call Wilson for your particular installation and location.
151917
No I haven't compared them. I used to go to Radio Shack and just buy on. But this last time I went on line and the site I went to asked me some questions and to give them my zip code. It recommended one. It was cheaper than the one at Radio Shack and it worked really good. I am on Direct TV now with the antenna as a back up. I am 50 miles from Houston.
680660
I have no experience with the antenna you inquired about but did replace an Antenna Direct DB9 with the Winegard. The Winegard is slightly superior to the DB8. The only antenna I have tried that is better than the Winegard flat wave is a highly directional 177 foot Wineard that was just too long for the attic. The principal stations watched are about 50 miles away across some ridges and valleys and subject to a lot of stormy weather. The flat wave is doing pretty well, is smaller than the antenna it replaced and comes with a matched amplifier. kFor anything under 50 miles the flat wae should be quite adequite. David
1747344
They're both the same antenna as indicated by the model number, NA-771. Nagoya manufactures the antenna and it's sold by different companies so the pricing, although close, is a spread a little bit. The NA-771 I have is a very good antenna and much better than the stock Baofeng antenna that came with the radio. It has a MUCH longer range and allows me to hit various repeaters as far away as 35 miles on a good day.
1719256
There are a number of big differences in the models. The SBG6782-AC supports the 802.11ac Wi-Fi specifications as well as 802.11b/g/n. The SBG6782-AC is also a dual-concurrent Wi-Fi access point where the 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wireless Radios are both enabled at the same time. The SBG6580 is a dual-radio / non-concurrent Wi-Fi AP. The SBG6782-AC also has a faster processor and is built on the next generation Cable Modem Chipset.
268434
Don't know about functional differences, but this antennae worked great. Picked up lots of stations about 50 miles from a city! Would not hold up in strong wind though
378954
I have used my Crane Super USB antenna for a bit over a year; absolutely NO complaints using the single antenna, with dual USB connections on a laptop. As I said, I do connect using the 15-foot extension cable; makes antenna placement much easier. I agree with the comment below regards two antennas, but will readily admit that I'm NOT a techie; just a satisfied user. I put this product in the increasingly rare category of "works-as-advertised". Good luck with it, and post your results!
818311
I think the only difference is the mounting style and the amplifier style. Other than that everything else is the same. I also bought some rabbit ears, as they were pretty cheap. My personal opinion is that the rabbit ears perform just as well, so would purchase them over the Terk FDTV2A if I had it to do all over again.
875919
The model referenced is the VHF/UHF model. This model would be a good choice. I am assuming you are aware that an amateur radio license is required to transmit with this radio in the ham bands.
799676
A quick look at that shows it has 4 antennas, and this pack has 3. If I recall correctly when researching new antennas I found other 9db's in a 2-pack; maybe get two of those? Beyond that, it looks like it has the correct connector type, but I can't confirm. One thing I did find was that Linksys plans to introduce an optional high-gain upgrade set sometime this summer. Sorry I wasn't more helpful.
78324
it appeared to me that the primary difference was in design configuration. I bought the model I did because it was represented to withstand severe winter weather conditions (we get substantial snow and wind in our location). The towers we get signal from are 75-85 miles away across two mountain ranges, and our reception is excellent.
359431
They are both very similar in the technology used for the antenna. I have used the Amazon amplified version for over a month now and am very happy with the unit. I did find that I had to manually add some of the channels as my automatic scan did not pick up many of the channels. Once I did the manual add, I get channels that I didn't even have available with cable. I live in an area where I get Detroit and Toledo channels over the air.