Is this the older version where each utensil weighs more and is sturdier?
1618034
I have a newer version that is made in china. Nice looking but rather cheap. I believe the older versions are made in England and would be sturdier. Hope that helps.
1618035
Mine were made in Cihina they aren't flimsy and are very nice. I wish I had an old set to compare but I think you would be happy with the set
1618036
They have a nice feel in the hand. Nothing from Wal Mart can compare. I am very happy with my set. So pretty, too!
1618037
I think so :) Looks elegant mixed with the Fine China made in England.You will not think it is cheap :) Unless ...you are a Royal Doulton expert.
1618038
Bev if it is the same one I purchased within the last 2 years it is really nice and is weighty and is very sturdy. We love it. Hope this helps.
1847368
A reviewer indicates that this is much sturdier than the walmart version, citing that her two kids have broken the walmart ones twice but not this one.I weigh 130 and I have one of the "weaker" walmart ones which holds me fine.
258001
The new one has a better handle and swiffer head. It does not flip and I find the lengthof staff with a comfortable knob to hold onto makes it so much easier to use in odd places. Good luck with a new one.
386882
The difference is in the quality of the plastic and the sharpness of the blades. This grater is a heavier plastic, so it's not wobbly in your hand, nor does it flex like cheaper types, or even some stainless types. This is the same type of grater you see brought to your table in Italian Restaurants, like the Olive Garden. If you purchase this one you won't be unhappy, and it washes easily in your dishwasher with no problems. My dishwasher is set at an extra hot water temperature and it hasn't harmed this grater in the slightest.
815955
I have two - one older (20 yrs) and this newer one you are asking about. Both are Kaiser. Both seem to be the same thickness and cook about the same. I do have to watch the newer one to make sure it doesn't get the crust too dark as it is just a little darker in color. You say your Calphalon is heavier, so you might want to watch the cook time in case it needs adjusting. Also, be careful you haven't bought Kaiser's cheaper version, which looks identical except of the lock; that one is noticeably thinner and isn't worth having. Good luck.
331444
Thanks for your inquiry! I do believe the model is the older style. With that said it could be the more flimsy style. Thanks and have a great day!!!
849532
Hi Laurie, I am honestly not sure but for me personally I always go with the newest model of anything I buy. My thought process is a new feature or something was improved for it to have changed. This is lightweight, easy to fold down for transporting, pulls with ease and most of all my Wheaten loves it!!!
1638760
Much sturdier and has a plastic like coating. Love mine and wold recommend it.
702860
Not that heavy. I replaced one recently and it's not as heavy as the original. However, I'm still happy with the pan. It's just not quite as good as the first one I bought.
1553946
I noticed that also. The cheaper model only weighs 9 lbs., this one weighs 13 lbs. Must be more heavy duty.
886968
Sorry but I don't know how it compares. This one is metal and has a sturdy feel to it. The serrated edge ceramic stone rattles a little. Might be heavier that some would like, I prefer that sturdy feel and weight however.
1872367
Yes. That may account for slight differences from the ones I bought 30 yrs. ago. This one is heavier and has a slight rim on the bottom. Otherwise is the same.
2027314
Its been awhile since i bought mine, but I remember that there were two that were very much alike. the only difference I could find is that one was a little more "tailored" with nicer lines on the handles and a nice scoop in the lid below the handle so your hand could fit into the handle better. A bit more refined, which is why I chose it. Look closely and you will see. Again, I am going by memory, and not by the model name.
1097397
Heavier than most pottery, but sturdier and less likely to shatter or chip..
1902173
It has more torque (measured in horsepower instead of watts), the three attachments are much larger and much heavier (they feel like they weigh about 5 times as much as the ones that come with the residential models. Also the bowl is much bigger than any of the bowls for the residential mixers.
227969
I don't believe so, but I returned them because we had kitchen remodeling to do and I was concerned about caring for them. My recollection is that the stainless were lighter, but both are lovely.
2019897
They were all different. FYI - mine arrived broken so i returned it right away. It is very light weight (read:cheap), I can't imagine being able to cut through a potato or carrot, the force would slide it around the counter or break the handle.