How do these compare to the sr225i?
1638273
Do not know. However, I just bought Audio-Technica ATH-m50's which I think are better. Better sound, beefier, and better for monitoring because they block out sound much better.
1638274
I haven't tested out the sr225i's. The sr125i's are by far the best headphones that I have owned. They have an amazing frequency range. I listen to a lot of rock and metal and these are perfect for that type of music. I hope this helps!
1638275
I can not speak for the sr225s but I would recommend the sr125s. Good value.
231537
Personally I would go with the AT92E over the AT311EP as it is cheaper and shares many internal parts. The big difference is gain, the AT311 has a gain of 5mV whereas the AT92E has the more standard 3.3mV.Either of these AT carts will sound decent, though probably not as detailed as your P22 which I suspect you are replacing due to wear.The weak link in these is the needle ... check this out if your budget allows http://www.turntableneedles.com/AT92E-Cartridge-wShibata-JICO-Brand-Needle_p_3716.html
598201
Absolutely! I have a pair of them and a friend of mine has an SR22, he uses the other one every time we shoot!
2145723
I reviewed the L70SRW and am only familiar with that model. Other than a difference in price, I'm not sure how they compare. I can only say that I am very pleased with the model I have. I suggest you carefully review the description of each model to make your decision. Sorry I am unable to offer more.
2139173
Using a Taylor 210, with the recommended 13's. I went back and forth with the 80/20s and Phosphor Bronze. I prefer the 80/20s Bronze. I think they are just a little clearer. The Phosphor Bronze sounds balanced and real good, but a little deeper. But it all boils down to what suits you.
1582194
They are excellent as in-ear monitors. I've used them playing Bass and our drummer uses the SE215 too specifically as monitors. There's no volume control on the 215's - so the in-ear receiver volume is pretty much what they're made for. Tremendous quality once you figure out the best cushions to use.
67144
Had the pleasure of owning both. The SE535's are very good and I while I expected the SE846's to be better then the 535's, I was doubtful that they would be good enough for me to spend the extra $'s. Wrong. The 846's are a totally different immersive music experience and the difference is both in clarity (sounds that you can't discern with most other headphones) and the bass, that is clear and not overbearing. My wife won't allow me to wear them in the house (sound isolation is immense) but I seek out time to listen to them as they are a treat, every time!
1049474
The cooling. The 22 is better for temp wise. There might be more but its pretty easy to do a Google search on both and compare them yourself :D. I don't know why its cheaper then the 06 to be honest something doesn't sound right there. I would look into it further yourself.
846059
I thought I would buy a Canon HG20 because my current camcorder and camera are a Canon, but once I actually held both the Canon HG20 and the Sony SR11 in my hand, there was no doubt that the Sony SR11 was worth the price difference. The construction quality, placement of controls and the vivid LCD screen of the Sony SR11 make it a superior choice over the Canon HG20. I had my Canon camcorder for 8 years so I always look to buy a quality product that I will use for a long time. I would recommend you go to a store to compare the Sony and the Canon to see the difference in person.
1782126
Though I have never used the ATR2500, I did read the specs and it's a superior instrument compared to the 2100. The price tells the story as well. The 2500 is a condenser microphone where-as the 2100 is a dynamic type. The frequency response is wider with the 2500. I am very pleased with the performance of the ATR2100-USB using it for recording acoustic and electric guitar, percussion instruments, and vocals. For the price you can't go wrong. I am running Windows Vista home premium 32 bit with 2gb of ram on a 5 year old HP/Compaq Presario using Audacity sound editing free software and the results are fine. I hope this helps Though I have never used the ATR2500, I did read the specs and it's a superior instrument compared to the 2100. The price tells the story as well. The 2500 is a condenser microphone where-as the 2100 is a dynamic type. The frequency response is wider with the 2500. I am very pleased with the performance of the ATR2100-USB using it for recording acoustic and electric guitar, percussion instruments, and vocals. For the price you can't go wrong. I am running Windows Vista home premium 32 bit with 2gb of ram on a 5 year old HP/Compaq Presario using Audacity sound editing free software and... » Read More Though I have never used the ATR2500, I did read the specs and it's a superior instrument compared to the 2100. The price tells the story as well. The 2500 is a condenser microphone where-as the 2100 is a dynamic type. The frequency response is wider with the 2500. I am very pleased with the performance of the ATR2100-USB using it for recording acoustic and electric guitar, percussion instruments, and vocals. For the price you can't go wrong. I am running Windows Vista home premium 32 bit with 2gb of ram on a 5 year old HP/Compaq Presario using Audacity sound editing free software and the results are fine. I hope this helps « Show Less
1192319
I can't compare the two, but reviews I read indicated specs for the 140 were better at the edges. I bought the 140 several months ago, and am very pleased with quality and speed.
1051116
I received the QC 25's last week, wore them twice and I'm sending them back. Had the same ear pressure issue and that is why I'm looking at the 20i's.
2145502
As far as I know, the differences are minimal....Both are excellent; save the $20,go with the 190XB. I love mine.
1753071
To me, the sound quality on both is almost the same (I'm no audiophile). The key differences between the two are more in the physical characteristics. The S5i is supposedly built more rugged and is water resistant. The remote is huge though.
1585867
They are noticeably more adept to separating instruments from vocals. I would skip these and go straight to the 225i though. They are the sweet spot.
903257
I am looking at the same comparison because of Costco.I believe the 550 has SRS (Audio) and the 540 does not. I think this is a big enough difference for $50 and a newer model. However I am sure there are a few other differences.SRS TruSurround HD creates an immersive, feature-rich surround sound experience from two speakers, complete with rich bass, high frequency detail and clear dialog.
1650352
Weak. You should Check the cheaper model (se 215). It Will be so more fun to ear to