is 3d better than when this came out or is it pretty much the same across all other brands/year of other models?is there a better 3dtv as of today?
50684
I haven't seen a brand new 3D for this year. The ones I have seen are a couple years old, but with this one its great quality and you don't need powered glasses like some other models. However normal HD bounces btw 720/1080 and is not Always without the 'streaky blur'. If mainly 3D viewing, I say it's worth it, if u can handle a few glitches-but can maybe be repaired with the perfect settings.
743827
This is one feature of the TV that I have not used in a while. I personally think that it is just a novelty. I still have the 55" TV I bought and it is still working fine. I chose the passive 3d because you can use the glasses from the 3d movies you would watch in theaters. The active 3d shutter glasses are expensive and needs to be recharged.
743828
There are active glasses and passive glasses. This TV has passive glasses (like the movie theater) they don't need batteries like active glasses. TV's require one or the other. The picture is very similar with both types. 1080p is the highest resolution you will get with 3D without paying 5000+. So this TV does have good 3D, I bought it brand new in 2011. The only complaint I have is the pixilation occurs once in a while. I paid 2700 for it brand new, so under a 1000, this TV is a good deal. 3D is the same since it came out, the 4k TV's with 3D are the exception and they are expensive. LED is better than plasma, but more expensive. The viewing angle (how far to the right or left) is good with this TV. There are active glasses and passive glasses. This TV has passive glasses (like the movie theater) they don't need batteries like active glasses. TV's require one or the other. The picture is very similar with both types. 1080p is the highest resolution you will get with 3D without paying 5000+. So this TV does have good 3D, I bought it brand new in 2011. The only complaint I have is the pixilation occurs once in a while. I paid 2700 for it brand new, so under a 1000, this TV is a good deal. 3D is the same since it came out, the 4k TV's with 3D are the exception and they are expensive. LED... » Read More There are active glasses and passive glasses. This TV has passive glasses (like the movie theater) they don't need batteries like active glasses. TV's require one or the other. The picture is very similar with both types. 1080p is the highest resolution you will get with 3D without paying 5000+. So this TV does have good 3D, I bought it brand new in 2011. The only complaint I have is the pixilation occurs once in a while. I paid 2700 for it brand new, so under a 1000, this TV is a good deal. 3D is the same since it came out, the 4k TV's with 3D are the exception and they are expensive. LED is better than plasma, but more expensive. The viewing angle (how far to the right or left) is good with this TV. « Show Less
1370377
I've always bought Sony tvs but after comparing the sharp tv to the sony I went with the sharp the color pop off the screen the 3d is amazing, the regular picture is beyond compare. I generally get buyers remorse after a big purchase but not with the sharp tv.
369337
Yes, it is an HD TV that has the capacity to play in 3D. You don't have to use the 3D feature at all, but its there if you want to. I've used the 3D and its fantastic. I just prefer to watch my movies without it.
2068919
I already have a big 2D lcd, 24" would be a downgrade. I have not yet seen a 3D tv that didn't have left-right image crosstalk, so the HMZ with separate right-left screens sounds interesting. After all, I had a lot of fun with the Virtual Boy back in the day...
1313920
Only if u watch a good amount of 3d programing, ie movies or games not much broadcasting 3d available, i own two 3d sets but only because i wanted the 240 hz, which does make a difference to me, if i could of found a set with the 240 hz and no 3d for less i would of chose it, 3d is just a gimmick to me in my opinion.....
753102
We have the 55 inch LG in 3d and we love it! Bought it in 2011 and it still works great. The 3D is nice to have but not too many good 3D movies out there. Buy it if you need a new flat screen.
185961
Not firsthand but I read a lot of reviews on 3D capable TV's and the prevalent opinion of those who have purchased such 3D TVs is that the feature improves the picture and is not high in cost. I bought my TV just a few days ago and may be able to give you a better answer soon. Hopefulskeptic
1802805
Scotty picture is excellent, I use it for gaming combined with a GTX780 video card, and it rocks. I find 3d pretty much worthless, at least for gaming.
2032213
I actually just bought the 8500 today, at my local Besy Buy. They had one brand new one left at the store (although they did say that they had about 30 left at the warehouse here in St. Loius). I was able to get it for $2950. The salesman said I basically paid their cost for the TV. Not sure really believe that... Anyhow, I must say, this is quite possibly the best picture I have ever seen on a TV. I was going to wait until the 3D 8000, however, after reading a bunch of reviews, and seeing the 3D 8000 at my local Ultimate Electronics, I decided to just go with the 8500.
558157
If you have the money, this one is the better market value. I see other's buying the higher priced ones and are complaining already.I love the 3d on my Tv and I plan on keeping it for a while. You will see for the price you didnt make a mistake.
883568
We have been very happy with ours. Had it a year. The picture is very crisp. Do not use the 3D very much as it takes 3 hours to charge the glasses, although when we have used it, it looks pretty good.We did have a small issue when we first received the tv, but it was repaired within a week. In our experience their customer service was great.
546192
Really counts on how much 3D do you want. I have watched several Blue Ray HD disk and there is great depth when running it in 3D mode. Nothing comes out of the screen at you but there is depth on the screen. So to me that is a select kind of 3D. I really enjoy my games on Xbox 360 have come alive some are 3D games some are not, yes I can a difference in the games that say 3D versus regular games but even the regular games have depth now that they didn't and to me, looks really cool. A very inexpensive way to change what you are seeing. It does claim that slow viewing IE: news events thing like that are not all that good and they are right but who wants to see their local weatherman in 3D anyway? I have been impressed but remember this is not movie going 3D it is adding depth to the clip nothing pops out or floats around your room like real 3D does. I have not been disappointed does exactly what Its says it will.
1050586
A. Leetham,Thanks for the info, it was very helpful. Based on your informative review of the C7000, I've decided to hold off on purchasing the C7000 until I read your review of the C8000, and until I have a chance to see it in person. Plus, I want to take advantage of the free 3D Starter Kit that Samsung is supposed to be offering soon.By chance, do you know when the C8000 will be available for purchase?Thanks!
752733
The v3 is the better one because it will work on any 3d tv. The v3 is also compatible with the finepix v3 camera
436839
I returned this model for the 9300. The 9800 model has been discontinued. Same TV, better software operating system. My son who watches much more tv than I do tells me this is the best passive 3D he's seen.
2197290
I'm not impressed by the 3D on the tv. You need special powered glasses that have to sync with the TV. There's also image ghosting. My Inlaws have a cheap LG TV and the 3D is much better on that, they can use the glasses that come free at the movie theater and the quality of the 3D is much better than the Sony 3D.
558156
I have heard that projection TVs are best for the 3D effect. Do you know if it's true? The price of this one is amazing and I know there is a bulb that needs replaced after like 5 or 6,000 hours, but if you only use it for an occasional 3D movie or game, it should last quite a while.