Is this paper thick enough to be used for cards/invitations?
1616849
Really is not for cards invitations purposes, is a photographic paper not to be folded, is thick but I'll not recommended for cards.
1616850
Yes, You can only print on one side however so don't expect it to be usable as a two sided card or postcard. The back side of the paper has the words 'EPSON" printed numerous times diagonally across the back to indicate the unusable side. It is designed more for printing photos for framing or archiving in an album. There are papers specifically for cards/invitations that are printable on both sides.
901187
These appear to be about the same thickness as my 65# cardstock. Hope that helps.
183449
No, this is meant to protect the work on the paper with as little influence on the paper as possible. I would recommend using cardstock, that's closer to playing cards.
1379705
Not thick enough for business cards. Check out Avary Business Card products... that's what I use.
985628
I guess it would, but I think of a deck of cards being thicker than this. I use these for greeting cards, but they are thinner greeting cards and I layer at least 2 more layers of card stock on top to get me the thickness. I guess it would depend on what kind of playing cards. If its just for a party favor or maybe just for a few times use, these should be okay.
413746
The paper is 10 mils thick. It is thinner and more flexible than a business card.
18533
Yes. As Fadi said, not thick. However, the gloss and weight still should make a very nice certificate to present and have framed if desired. I would use it for a certificate.
1205391
It's the thickness of regular poster board. If you are only folding it once to make a book cover I think it would work for that.
905342
The label on the package of this cardstock states "110/199 g/m2" (Basis) and "26.44 M" (M weight). I'm not sure what that means but this is not what you'd want if you were trying to make business cards. You'd want something stiffer or thicker. I use it as a cover for books and that application works well. In fact, it is about the same thickness as the cover of a paperback book. It's not shiny on one side. It's matte and smooth (but not slick) on both sides.
172446
I'm not sure, Briley. It is thicker than regular paper but a little thinner than card stock. I use mine as a wrap for around my homemade goat milk soaps. Wish I could give you a better answer than that.
491418
Not very thick. I don't have any devices to measure it, but it's about as thick as 5 or 6 sheets of paper or two business cards. I know that's not very precise, depending on the quality or the paper or the card.
1577481
Maybe a quarter of an inch thick. It would take a while for a guest at a wedding to fill it up. Most people only used 1-5 pages.
1325133
i haven't tried it but it i blieve you should be able to. it's just a slightly thicker paper
1758341
I feel it would be to thick. It is good quality photo paper. Hope this helps.
18534
This is not thick. Color laser photo papers are thin, but has somewhat of a glossy effect. If this is going for a copier, it should work perfectly fine. Otherwise, if you're looking for something thick as far as paper, then no. There are other options
343827
It should be ok for use with card stock, but as is the case with any thicker paper, it is just naturally more opaque.
1413820
Not sure -- by comparison, of course in my opinion, this paper is more like Stampin-Up whisper white. It isn't as heavy as PapertreyInk or Ginia K's 110 lb cardstock.This paper is about the same weight as a good index card :-(