which one is it the 200 or the 100 ??????????????
1643488
I got the 200... It had better features and a very nice design. This unit is great for the price, you get the same features of units that cost in the 800 to 1000.00 range. It's worth getting. The units very lite, designed well, (looks cool) and has been extremely actuate for me, the gps function is also very handy in finding your way back to a good spot.
1782876
I have NOT used a 100. My educated "guess" would be, owing to the feature set in particular (SBM, et al) that the edge would go to the newer, slightly "beefier" 100. That being said, I'm not sure that in a familiar environment, under ideal conditions, anybody would find telling the two apart would be particularly easy. It's an equivocal attempt at an answer, but I suspect the real question is "Is the 100 worth difference in price?" Only you can divine that answer for yourself. Shop carefully, don't pull the trigger on anything that does not have a generous return option and (if possible) audition them side by side..... I have NOT used a 100. My educated "guess" would be, owing to the feature set in particular (SBM, et al) that the edge would go to the newer, slightly "beefier" 100. That being said, I'm not sure that in a familiar environment, under ideal conditions, anybody would find telling the two apart would be particularly easy. It's an equivocal attempt at an answer, but I suspect the real question is "Is the 100 worth difference in price?" Only you can divine that answer for yourself. Shop carefully, don't pull the trigger on anything that does not have a generous... » Read More I have NOT used a 100. My educated "guess" would be, owing to the feature set in particular (SBM, et al) that the edge would go to the newer, slightly "beefier" 100. That being said, I'm not sure that in a familiar environment, under ideal conditions, anybody would find telling the two apart would be particularly easy. It's an equivocal attempt at an answer, but I suspect the real question is "Is the 100 worth difference in price?" Only you can divine that answer for yourself. Shop carefully, don't pull the trigger on anything that does not have a generous return option and (if possible) audition them side by side..... « Show Less
1998344
Smaller. The 100 is a 1.0 litre (600ml effective), meaning you can really only boil 0.6L. The 120 is 1.2 litre (800ml effective). So basically, the 100 is a 0.6L, and the 120 is a 0.8L. Totally straight-forward, right? ;) Anyhow, hope this helps!
1109727
I bought the 150 and the 100. Both were advertised as the pro versions and I received the pro versions.
647457
I dont know but it works great in my 200 and the ink last super long time.... great product....
147248
I have a PX-110 and it worked great for me. Don't know why it wouldn't work on the 200, but I don't know for sure.
1983877
Mine is actually the the mc200. And it is a plug in only. They both have to be plugged in. They are pretty close the 200 has the wi-fi though. Hope this helps. With Bluetooth you maybe limited to range. I am sure the sound the same though also. There are better sounding ones but the price is more than double. I am happy with this choice. We listen to country, soft rock, rock, easy listening stuff and all of them sound perfect. It is pretty loud if you want it to be.
1972150
I own both. But if you only want one, well, a. if you value light-weight, smaller size, easier to lug around, then get the 18-200 b. if you really really want the extra zoom, and don't mind the extra mass, get the 18-300 I wanted both worlds...but I will tell you, my hand did get tired more quickly with the 18-300 mounted...and after I saw the difference in the full zoom pics, I thought to myself : "Is that all the extra I get?"....which I did want more zoom, and I am happy, but thought it would be much bigger than actual results... Holding/shooting with one hand, the 200 felt like a pleasure...the 300 felt hefty. I think hobby-ists can do without the extra zoom...try and find samples of shots at 200mm and 300mm zooms, and decide if it makes a difference to you...
1621548
I have the PSW505 and I love it, watching movies you actually feel like the room is shaking. I would advise taking the PSW505, now that being said, I have not heard or had the PL-200. Hope this helps.
895347
NO WAY. I own both cameras, the 110 and the 200. The batteries are different sizes. I'm looking at them as I type this.
1767698
The one sad thing with the 220 is it can only do 3 fields per page. The 620 can do four like the 305. I don't understand why it's so difficult for these watches to have four metrics on one page. I think the 620 is the only daily wearing watch that will do four fields.
1359333
The pl-200 is just an upgraded version. 250w rms amp compared to the bic f12s 150w rms. I own the f12 and an very impressed. If your budget allows the pl-200, go for it, but for 95% of people the f12 does a fantastic job.
45606
the 200 has a way better cmos ccd, therefore way better video. go compare them at the store. the 2 lcds next to each other are like night and day.
1704613
The other difference between this model and the BRK-100 is the dimension of the oven. The BRK-200 is larger.
1596566
Yes, the bikes are exactly the same. The 200 is just the 100 with the computer console. Just let me know if I can be of more help. Thanks, Andy
1175515
It will do 100s. I started with this one. I got tired of the rejects and went to kings and a powermatic II. I dont have rejects anymore.
1758726
Looks like the ELPH 300 sports a wider angle lens (24mm) than the ELPH 100 (28mm) and a 5x zoom, vs. the 4x zoom on the ELPH 100. The back interface is also different. The 300 offers several more buttons, including one-touch video mode, and a 2.7" LCD screen. The 100 has fewer buttons and a 3" LCD screen. That 24mm lens sounds especially good to me. I also prefer more buttons vs. a larger screen, and obviously the 5x zoom is an advantage. I'm going to give the ELPH 300 a shot. EDIT: Also read that the 100 does not optically zoom during video, but I'm not sure of that. Worth checking out if it's important to you. I know the 300 supports optical zoom during video, which for me is important. Looks like the ELPH 300 sports a wider angle lens (24mm) than the ELPH 100 (28mm) and a 5x zoom, vs. the 4x zoom on the ELPH 100. The back interface is also different. The 300 offers several more buttons, including one-touch video mode, and a 2.7" LCD screen. The 100 has fewer buttons and a 3" LCD screen. That 24mm lens sounds especially good to me. I also prefer more buttons vs. a larger screen, and obviously the 5x zoom is an advantage. I'm going to give the ELPH 300 a shot. EDIT: Also read that the 100 does not optically zoom during video, but I'm not sure of that. Worth... » Read More Looks like the ELPH 300 sports a wider angle lens (24mm) than the ELPH 100 (28mm) and a 5x zoom, vs. the 4x zoom on the ELPH 100. The back interface is also different. The 300 offers several more buttons, including one-touch video mode, and a 2.7" LCD screen. The 100 has fewer buttons and a 3" LCD screen. That 24mm lens sounds especially good to me. I also prefer more buttons vs. a larger screen, and obviously the 5x zoom is an advantage. I'm going to give the ELPH 300 a shot. EDIT: Also read that the 100 does not optically zoom during video, but I'm not sure of that. Worth checking out if it's important to you. I know the 300 supports optical zoom during video, which for me is important. « Show Less