What's the difference between this brush and the 48220 which is about five bucks more?
1624420
I have not purchased the 48220 product before, but based on the description: I would guess that the 48221 has stiffer bristles. The -20 product describes that duster as "soft". We find the -21 brush has rather stiff bristles. We use this product for dusting exposed duct work, pipes, partial walls, and other industrial type areas in lofts, so I would consider it heavy-duty "isn".Hope this helps!
1624421
I have not purchased the 48220 product before, but based on the description: I would guess that the 48221 has stiffer bristles. The -20 product describes that duster as "soft". We find the -21 brush has rather stiff bristles. We use this product for dusting exposed duct work, pipes, partial walls, and other industrial type areas in lofts, so I would consider it heavy-duty "isn". Hope this helps!
1624422
Other answers are wrong. According to the Ettore website the 48220 fits threaded poles and the 48221 fits click-loc poles. The pictures look different and there may also be a difference in the bristles.
1624423
Robert, I saw your reply. Here's what I found. Google Ettore, click on Professionals Enter Here, Click on products, Click on Dusters and High Reach, scroll down to cobweb brush. There is a list of 5 variations of the cobweb brush including 48220 and 48221.
1571393
I actually purchased this vacuum at Costco because I was there and was able to look at it and saw that it had a brush attachment. I know the same vacuum is cheaper at Amazon and if I buy another (for a backup vacuum) I'll definitely get it from Amazon and perhaps one that has more attachments, although I'm perfectly happy with this vacuum. As for the 356 model, that one comes with more attachments, the 352 also seems to come with an extra crevasse tool (there are two sizes in the box. I hope this helps.
135767
I actually have purchased both... I was more impressed with the SWMP4LS. It is larger, fells more beefy in my hand, and has a smooth spring action. The 5 model is springier, but snappier. The blade on the 5 is much more pointy, which you may like, but I don't. Both safeties have worked well for me. Again though, the 4 model I prefer much more for most jobs. Much larger, but that doesn't matter much to me. If size or weight is an issue, maybe the 5 model would be best.
1071429
Yes this is the brushless version. The brushed version doesn't have a whole lot of issues. I have both
2056910
The brush is very good. It has a curve in it that works really well for me. If I were you, I would not hesitate to buy one.
510823
I found this info from another site, School of Wash.com. This is the site: http://schoolofwash.com/product/wet-shave-essentials/parker-chrome-handle-silvertip-badger-brush-premium/ I had been looking for the same info earlier. Also note the price differential. I ordered mine from Amazon.
611680
There are a number of differences, including: 1. The handle on the 6 is built in, while in the 5 it flips up. 2. The 6 has a cover around the base; the 5 does not. 3. The food tray is bigger and rounder on the 6. 4. The 6 has a bigger juice bowl and pulp bin. 5. The auger on the 6 is 8 times stronger than the 5's. 6. The on switch on the 5 is on the top of the juicer while the 6 has it on the back. 7. The 6 has a 15 year warranty. The 5 only 10 years. 8. The 5 is about $40 cheaper than the 6.
426916
Most of the silver series has ball ended bristles like a traditional brush while the blue has textured plastic wire bristles. The blue series also has a metal core and gets hot when using a blow dryer causing your hair to dry and style into place faster
703871
I think it's suitable for both. You can get a cheaper set of brushes though. I see that a similar set of brushes is now avail in little more than 2 dollars. I guess I paid too much foor my set considering they look the same thing.
979769
Yes, I noticed that as well. There are a few other differences that I personally noticed- cord length- hose length- floor surface settings- one looks better than the otherI ended up going with the 3920 just because it was what was available, plus because of what the cust serv rep told me. But I'm not sure it was worth the extra $20-$30 that I paid.I ended up going with the 3920
979773
ok.. well it was the same rep apparantly.I will just open the 4104 and try it out.. If I don't like it, I will return it. thanks for your help. The thing is.. those comparisons you linked above are not the same as what is listed on the box. The tools have different names, and the "pet hair lifter' attached to the bottom of the machine is not listed on the site, but clearly states it on the box, and I played with it in the store so I know it has it.. I don't trust the comparisons.Oh well. Thanks
162515
The only difference I found was the price. The one I bought here is just fine and does the job very well.
2047326
The brush works better than the cheap-o brushes.There are lots of sturdy bristles.The handle is easy to grip.
1211499
I think depending on your application you may not notice a difference. If your doing a lot of post processing with your computer you may see some faster completion times with the 4820 as it's a more robust processor (a wee bit), but for general purpose usage you're not going to notice the difference.
1627858
I am not sure but I think this is an average quality brush. It works but i haven't been overly impressed with it
7415
I believe the base is a the same (Oral B 5000). The difference is in which brush head you will get. So with the Professional care 5000, you get the professional care brush tip. With the 5000 deep sweep, you get the deep sweep brush head. Any of the brush heads will work on a Oral B 5000, so whichever one you get, if you wished you had gotten the other, just buy the other brush head.
1549645
Probably NT 54 - I think it's the second largest round brush size. The NT 64 would probably be too large.