Is it different than the apple corer?
1635049
Yes, the corer part is shaped to fit around the pit of the peach. An apple corer would be too small to cut around the core part of the peach.
1635050
Slightly. Peaches have an oval shaped pit, while apples have a cylindrical center. The difference on the peach corer is the center is shaped to fit the pit instead of seeds
1635051
Kind of. The inner hole is elongated to cut around the peach pit. I've never tried to use the apple corer on a peach or vice versa.
1635052
The apple corer/slicer has larger sections as compared to the peach one. Also, the centers are different. The apple center is round, and the peach one is oval and larger. I haven't tried the apple one on peaches. I guess the peach pit makes the difference. Anyway, I enjoy having both of them.
1862960
One is a plunge router the other is fixed. So it is not an apples to apples comparison. However I used the 621 plunge router. I have a 2 star review of I on Amazon I did not like it for 3 primary reasons: bad plunge and debt control mechanism, bad chip clearing due to the vacuum system and tendency to tip over due to the narrow base high handle combination. Because of these issues, I caould not recommend 621 at all. 618 is a fixed base and its handles are really low and it does not have a vacuum mechanism. That means that it will not have the 3 issues I listed. Given the two choices you provided, I would go with 618. Look at a different brand for a plunge router. I hope this helps. One is a plunge router the other is fixed. So it is not an apples to apples comparison. However I used the 621 plunge router. I have a 2 star review of I on Amazon I did not like it for 3 primary reasons: bad plunge and debt control mechanism, bad chip clearing due to the vacuum system and tendency to tip over due to the narrow base high handle combination. Because of these issues, I caould not recommend 621 at all. 618 is a fixed base and its handles are really low and it does not have a vacuum mechanism. That means that it will not have the 3 issues I listed. Given the two choices you... » Read More One is a plunge router the other is fixed. So it is not an apples to apples comparison. However I used the 621 plunge router. I have a 2 star review of I on Amazon I did not like it for 3 primary reasons: bad plunge and debt control mechanism, bad chip clearing due to the vacuum system and tendency to tip over due to the narrow base high handle combination. Because of these issues, I caould not recommend 621 at all. 618 is a fixed base and its handles are really low and it does not have a vacuum mechanism. That means that it will not have the 3 issues I listed. Given the two choices you provided, I would go with 618. Look at a different brand for a plunge router. I hope this helps. « Show Less
476470
All the Premiers have the same core. The verithins have a more solid core. Just a different name for the item description.
2149950
Mine is a genuine Back to Basics Peel Away -- the words are cast into the metal base and frame. If you want to core the apples, you have to let it slice them too. However, you do have the option of just peeling without coring or slicing by undoing the wing nut on the front and removing the corer/slicer blade.
1634043
No it's not. It looks similar but the flavor is definitely more coconutty and not oily.
1936151
I am not as pleased with this design as their last one. It doesn't shake as vigorously and takes longer to sift the 2 lbs of confectioners sugar that I use for a batch of royal icing. I timed it and it took almost 10 minutes to sift 2 pounds...but only filling 1/2 full and continuously adding. Flour might be different as it isn't as dense as CS. The battery life, however, seems longer than the older version. I haven't used the first battery that I got when I bought it...and I've been using it for a couple of months every 2 weeks or so. Hope this helps. All of that said, I'll probably buy another. I compared how I felt using a squeeze-handle sifter vs how I felt using the Norpro Battery Operated Sifter...and electronics win hands down. Just wished it was a more vigorous sifter. (and wish I could wash it - the old model allowed the handle to detach and you could wash the sifter)
284252
The one cokng out on the 30th is compatible with the iOS app, and has aluminum platters. The filter nobs are also a bit more reinforced. Other than that they are pretty much the same.
416351
Yep, that's only difference in the processor itself. The box it comes in has a slightly different design, however.
1384225
The corer comes with a hard plastic cover to cover the bottom of the slicer wher the sharp edges are. The cover also serves as a place to put the apple after pushing the corer thru the apple leaving small part of the apple left to slice. Place the apple on the cover according to the instructions and you are able to finish slicing the apple. Best corer I have ever had and it is very sturdy. If I ever happen to break it I would buy another immediately.
1271567
It has a small (semi-sheathed) blade that peels apples because they are of a uniform shape. I wouldn't even attempt tp peel potatoes in it. They are grittier (dirtier) of various shapes, sizes, and the flesh isn't the same texture as apples. So, no.
1720972
Well, lucky for you i can answer this because i also bought the appler corer peeler from amazon as well. The apple peeler/corer, did exactly what it meant to do. Peel and core the apple. The core from that came out thicker and the peels comes out in a separate strand. Now, this spiraler does core the apple and when you line up core with the hole before turning the handle, the core came out smaller and thinner because the size of the hole. The peels with this paderno spiraler will be mix in with the rest of the apple noodle. You can see the peel and separate it manually if you dont mind doing so. But the best thing is that you can do MORE things with this spiraler than the apple peeler/corer.
117333
No. It's not Apple. It's definitely a knock-off. And it's NOT perfect. But it works reasonably well and it was extremely nicely priced.
1124848
Yes I agree with you, they are all different but my experience is the difference is in how long they last. If you have an oven with an exposed heating element, as I do, all liners develop a weak spot where the small "feet" holding the heating element touch the liner. Chef's Planet seems to last longer. If you have the newer von with the bottom heating element hidden my opinion is one liner is about the same as the other.
2027314
Its been awhile since i bought mine, but I remember that there were two that were very much alike. the only difference I could find is that one was a little more "tailored" with nicer lines on the handles and a nice scoop in the lid below the handle so your hand could fit into the handle better. A bit more refined, which is why I chose it. Look closely and you will see. Again, I am going by memory, and not by the model name.
537928
The blade itself is 1/4 inch wide. The blade arm is set on a spring and you hold that to the apple with your left hand while turning the crank with your right hand. I am able to peel the biggest apples with no problem. I don't use the corer/slicer because it doesn't core the apples quite as much as I want them cored - it produces a core of less than 1" - and the slices it produces are too thin for most all of my recipes. But that's true of all corer/slicers, none of them will do exactly what you want done with the apple! So I use this gadget for peeling only and it saves a lot of time, I core and slice by hand. The blade itself is 1/4 inch wide. The blade arm is set on a spring and you hold that to the apple with your left hand while turning the crank with your right hand. I am able to peel the biggest apples with no problem. I don't use the corer/slicer because it doesn't core the apples quite as much as I want them cored - it produces a core of less than 1" - and the slices it produces are too thin for most all of my recipes. But that's true of all corer/slicers, none of them will do exactly what you want done with the apple! So I use this gadget for peeling only and it saves a lot of time,... » Read More The blade itself is 1/4 inch wide. The blade arm is set on a spring and you hold that to the apple with your left hand while turning the crank with your right hand. I am able to peel the biggest apples with no problem. I don't use the corer/slicer because it doesn't core the apples quite as much as I want them cored - it produces a core of less than 1" - and the slices it produces are too thin for most all of my recipes. But that's true of all corer/slicers, none of them will do exactly what you want done with the apple! So I use this gadget for peeling only and it saves a lot of time, I core and slice by hand. « Show Less
1063243
I would think a tomato corer, which is much larger, would remove much more of the fruit than the smaller strawberry corer.
1419662
I doubt there is any difference. I bought this one and really like it. Would reccommend.