already blew $150 on the opteka steadivid pro. is this any better, honestly!??
1627436
We'll I like it for some people is going to be garbage an for other no I have a canon 60d with sigma 18-35 and it works great
1627437
With time and practice any stabilizer should work perfectly, it took me a good while to figure it out and it works form I've used it on 3 separate projects.
1627438
(Nov 18) This unit works well, it took some effort to get the swing time correct, and the spin balance, but once done it works fine and tracks nicely and is smooth. The gamble is nearly perfect, if it was less so, it would have been easier to get everything in balance. But, make sure that you get the swing ( drop ) time to about 3 seconds, then work on balance. (Dec20 update:) I have about 20 hours of use out of it so far and it is really great. My only complaint is that I had it all balanced out and a TSA agent wanted to look under the plate, so took an hour to get it back to where I had it . . but for the price and size this is good kit! (Nov 18) This unit works well, it took some effort to get the swing time correct, and the spin balance, but once done it works fine and tracks nicely and is smooth. The gamble is nearly perfect, if it was less so, it would have been easier to get everything in balance. But, make sure that you get the swing ( drop ) time to about 3 seconds, then work on balance. (Dec20 update:) I have about 20 hours of use out of it so far and it is really great. My only complaint is that I had it all balanced out and a TSA agent wanted to look under the plate, so took an hour to get it back to... » Read More (Nov 18) This unit works well, it took some effort to get the swing time correct, and the spin balance, but once done it works fine and tracks nicely and is smooth. The gamble is nearly perfect, if it was less so, it would have been easier to get everything in balance. But, make sure that you get the swing ( drop ) time to about 3 seconds, then work on balance. (Dec20 update:) I have about 20 hours of use out of it so far and it is really great. My only complaint is that I had it all balanced out and a TSA agent wanted to look under the plate, so took an hour to get it back to where I had it . . but for the price and size this is good kit! « Show Less
1627439
well, for the price (119.00) this is a good option, I will post a test video soon about this product.
455848
sorry Sophia I was attempting to help. As I stated I owned both, I got rid of the Sealife when I got the Intova. It was so much better especially on video. The Intova was able to.do true blu ray quality HD1080p video. I was dissapointed with both color and grainy nature of reefmaster when I was able to compare them side by side. Perhaps you can try noth and return the one you find less satisfying. Just trying to offer personal experience so you get best for your money
561930
I know I am going to get blasted for this. I personally think that as far as Blu-Ray standalones that this player is the best option available. That being said investing over $400 in one of these when you don't have an HDMI V1.3 display (1080p/24p) is just plain insane as you are spending a whole bunch of extra money with technology that you won't use until you upgrade your set/projector. I would go with a Toshiba A3 which has 720p/1080i capabilities and costs a whopping $118.49 shipped. If nothing else the price difference is significant enough that you could make use of it until the prices on things like the panasonic or the better HDTV sets comes down to the point where it is more affordable. I know I am going to get blasted for this. I personally think that as far as Blu-Ray standalones that this player is the best option available. That being said investing over $400 in one of these when you don't have an HDMI V1.3 display (1080p/24p) is just plain insane as you are spending a whole bunch of extra money with technology that you won't use until you upgrade your set/projector. I would go with a Toshiba A3 which has 720p/1080i capabilities and costs a whopping $118.49 shipped. If nothing else the price difference is significant enough that you could make use of it until the... » Read More I know I am going to get blasted for this. I personally think that as far as Blu-Ray standalones that this player is the best option available. That being said investing over $400 in one of these when you don't have an HDMI V1.3 display (1080p/24p) is just plain insane as you are spending a whole bunch of extra money with technology that you won't use until you upgrade your set/projector. I would go with a Toshiba A3 which has 720p/1080i capabilities and costs a whopping $118.49 shipped. If nothing else the price difference is significant enough that you could make use of it until the prices on things like the panasonic or the better HDTV sets comes down to the point where it is more affordable. « Show Less
128813
My sister recommended opti to me. That's what she and all her friends use and have gotten great results. I don't mind paying little more if it's better product. I am not familiar with now. Hope this helps you to make a decision.
418931
I can't speak directly about this monitor, but the 23" VP2365 I have and use for photo editing and printing is a real winner at less than $250..This looks like a larger version of the same, and a real steal at the current pricing on Amazon..i say "go for it!"
845693
By the way, if you have not already purchased it, I would look at spending just a little more money and looking at the Vortex red dots. The quality is far beyond that of the Sightmark. I had one a couple of years ago and the adjustments quit working after about a month. You should be able to find a Vortex for a little over $100. All the red dots will need to be sighted in to be perfect but some are closer than others to begin with. Also, I may have just gotten a bad one. Almost all of them can be zeroed in the bright sunshine as well. They have adjustments for the brightness of the dot. I shoot with the vortex and I use one of the lowest settings in the middle of the day and they are plenty bright. By the way, if you have not already purchased it, I would look at spending just a little more money and looking at the Vortex red dots. The quality is far beyond that of the Sightmark. I had one a couple of years ago and the adjustments quit working after about a month. You should be able to find a Vortex for a little over $100. All the red dots will need to be sighted in to be perfect but some are closer than others to begin with. Also, I may have just gotten a bad one. Almost all of them can be zeroed in the bright sunshine as well. They have adjustments for the brightness of the dot. I... » Read More By the way, if you have not already purchased it, I would look at spending just a little more money and looking at the Vortex red dots. The quality is far beyond that of the Sightmark. I had one a couple of years ago and the adjustments quit working after about a month. You should be able to find a Vortex for a little over $100. All the red dots will need to be sighted in to be perfect but some are closer than others to begin with. Also, I may have just gotten a bad one. Almost all of them can be zeroed in the bright sunshine as well. They have adjustments for the brightness of the dot. I shoot with the vortex and I use one of the lowest settings in the middle of the day and they are plenty bright. « Show Less
1335795
Today's deal is the $742 and in addition to the body, you get a Pentax Optio (a slightly hidden offer on the electronics' page--it doesn't come up if you select the K20 directly). I already have an Optio in my briefcase. I rather have the price of the Optio discounted from the K20.
1329587
It's ok. Lower end 720p performance. And the wide angle lens is unnecessary for laptop use. For the money it's worth it. But id save for the Logitech imo
1530090
I hear you. You soon get used to these radical, whiplash tactics in technologies. Equipment of two years ago suddenly seems ancient--large and cumbersome and with fewer features, yet sometimes up to two times the price of what's current. I'm seeing Blue Rays by other manufacturers approaching the $100 level new. I try to live with it for a couple of years, then I reason I've gotten my money's worth and make the trip to the Salvation Army or the curb.
1763058
Thanks for the info. The VSX-9040 is only $6 more. Let us know how you like it if you get it. I haven't decided yet.
2160131
I had no luck with the Loftek. Returned after a few days. Also use Sensr.net. Could barely send 1 frame every 5 seconds.
1111393
I agree that 70-300 VR is a superior choice, but certainly have not been disappointed with my 55-300 VR. It didn't cost as much either.
1934848
BTW...yesterday I was in BB and Sony has just released a 32" XBR9 1080p with 120hz Motionflow technology... and it is up on the Sony Style website.. so much for what the salesman tell you that Sony is not going to produce..But compared to the Sony 32" 1080p 60 hz.. I thought the higher priced model with 120hz looked grainy to me. I really didn't see the $200 difference in the (retail price). Perhaps on Blu Ray disc viewing there is a difference.. GLTA
1743900
T.C. Thanks so much for a really thorough and helpful post. I'm far from a videophile, given my age (58) and thus waning eyesight, so as long as I see the screen and it has good clarity, that's enough. The additional bells and whistles would constitute decreasing returns to scale for me given my eyes being unable to appreciate the greater sharpness.
648124
I did check out PriceMad after I posted and there are way too many negative comments. I did buy the KDL 52W3000 from Amazon, thru their dealer, J&R-----.; I checked J&R; out and comments/reviews are great. I got it for $2199 with free s&H.; and it has been shipped, so they say.Whoopee!
1189617
I would say CC has a little better craftsmanship especially the attachment mechanism. However the opteka has great value for money
472153
The fl8se may be a little better, but it costs more also. VX-1 Pro does everything I need.