Can you play with 3 players or it always need to be 4?
1640229
Yes you can. In order to play with 3 players, simply pick the side that will not be used, do not put any stones in those pits and when players are making they're rounds they skip over this side and do not drop any stones in these pits. You can play Two players on with this set as well as just by skipping over two sides instead of just the one.Hope this helps!
1640230
Can play with two, three or four. You just skip the spaces in front of the unplayed sides.
458131
Can play with 4, more is better. 8 is about max. We have a lot of fun with this game.
1389696
I would think it would not be very fun with three. I've played it with four or more and that seems to work best. The more the merrier!
1686142
Four Is Certainly Not Too Few. I Prefer A Couple More, But I Enjoy Playing Regardless Of The Number Of People.
393278
Any level can be played with 1-4 players. the loading screen for each level prompts the user to decide the number of numbers for the upcoming level. Hope this helps.
1640161
I have several extentions and I play with 2 to 6 players depending on who's available.
1187894
Yes you can, and it even works with 4 players as well depending on how you set it up.
184240
you can. it will be really short and boring. i find fiasco works best with 4-5 players
610480
The game states two to four players. However, I suppose only one can play it just wont be as much fun.
897526
Yes. There is a miltiplayer offline mode. U can play 4 players at the same time is really great
1368511
Hi. The rules say that it's only 3 to 6 players. I tried to play it with my wife, but still one of us had to play for two houses at the same time.
604305
The game is designed for two to four players. With only two players, it can be a very predictable game of strategy. With three players there's an added element of unpredictablity that adds to the fun/suspense.
2075689
It has to be played with more than 2 people... Which is a bummer! My husband and I love the game but can only play when we are entertaining.
259066
you can put any player on input 1-2-3-4. I think you can do it without any problem!
1240972
I don't see why you can't play with 3 players. I think it would work just fine. More players often makes the game more fun since there are more answers to bet on but 3 should be just fine in my opinion.
191081
Yes, you need two to four players. You cannot play by yourself. It's like Solitaire only with more players. My granddaughters play it with me - the youngest is seven, but I learned with my cousin and his wife who are my age (70's) There is just enough awareness needed to make it interesting. It was like eating peanuts, we kept playing more games. I had taught my granddaughters how to play Solitaire when they saw me playing it and so it was an easy transition to Kings in the Corner. Enjoy! Beth A.
1764202
I have tried playing with two before but this game is definitely NOT built for only two. Even with three the real fun of the game is somewhat subdued. I believe four is optimal, because while you can play with more, the game starts to really lag with higher numbers of players, especially if there are any new players in your group.But as for the original question: No, it is not nearly as fun with two people. Half the fun of the game is choosing who to help and who to hurt and when is the best time to do it. With only two people it takes away much of the "Munchiness" that the game is really built around. I have tried playing with two before but this game is definitely NOT built for only two. Even with three the real fun of the game is somewhat subdued. I believe four is optimal, because while you can play with more, the game starts to really lag with higher numbers of players, especially if there are any new players in your group.But as for the original question: No, it is not nearly as fun with two people. Half the fun of the game is choosing who to help and who to hurt and when is the best time to do it. With only two people it takes away much of the "Munchiness"... » Read More I have tried playing with two before but this game is definitely NOT built for only two. Even with three the real fun of the game is somewhat subdued. I believe four is optimal, because while you can play with more, the game starts to really lag with higher numbers of players, especially if there are any new players in your group.But as for the original question: No, it is not nearly as fun with two people. Half the fun of the game is choosing who to help and who to hurt and when is the best time to do it. With only two people it takes away much of the "Munchiness" that the game is really built around. « Show Less