How is Lightkiwi&Acirc;&reg; X8402 different from Lightkiwi T4460 other than thickness
1621420
X8402 includes 4 cool white panels and T4460 includes 3 Cool white panels. Thank you.
35469
In practical terms of operation, there is no difference. The hash rate is the same. The newer, thinner profile expands the USB hubs you can use, since USB port spacing becomes less of a concern. Also, the newer line offers some different colors. Just do your homework on hashrate difficulty, and be an informed consumer before jumping into these things.
1224848
I am sorry but I do not know. I am starting to hate this router. It is causing my computer nothing but problems. My friend says it will work. He checked it out. I don't like this router and I am going back to Lynksys.
2037880
Hi,This won't work if your using lightbridge as well. If you are wanting to use lightbridge you should use the K900.Sincerely,Brandon
1057665
A firmware update on the co. web site is the difference as I recall but I don't member exactly what was changed.
1264176
Hello, I have not done much of research (yet) on replacement on 4400N (still works great after 5 years). Had my hands on Cisco RV220W. works very well with networked HP printer, TV Wi-Fi player and all apple products as well. Not too sure about it's updated interface layout (?). But will look soon for the more recent Cisco Router/Firewall. RV220W is over 3 years old already.
406615
Same thing. LNC216 is retail box. LNC204 is just the camera I believe. I have 4 LNC 216. I would recommend NOT purchasing them. Here is why: 1. Video quality is relatively poor. 2. Temp sensor is always 10 degrees off 3. PIR motion sensor really blows compared to my $400 VIvotek camera 4. Tech support, try call their tech support before purchasing and listen to # of minutes wait. It is ALWAYS 45+ minutes. Their email support is also horrible. 5. The iPhone/ipad app has no way to do fast forward / rewind of videos from the NAS/camera SD card. 6. These are just rebranded Starvedia cameras, lorex doesn't even make them. 7. Cameras have small blips where they stop recording to NAS, and occasionally stop writing altogether until you REBOOT them. All in all, VERY UNSTABLE cameras.
401467
this version is the thinnest 1 TB I have owned, I have a 1 TB Rikiki Go also and this is thinner than that.
467649
I am not sure why the discrepancy. The model number on my computer was BHI7N11.
1264643
Is there something magical about serial numbers above RIA138? Did they change the dovetail? I've got one that's RIA162 and am trying to find a set of night sites that will install without much pain.
124369
WD has ARM processor single core 2ghz vs atom dual core 2ghz in the ds 412. The ds 412 also has an intel chip that will benefit from AES instruction sets if you use encryption. I also am a huge fan of PLEX which streams and transcodes (changes to file format on the fly to one supported by your device). Actually the ds 412 apps (not plex, just the stock synology apps) will actually transcode for you as well. See www.synology.com/en-global/support/FAQ/577. Finally, I googled a few reviews of the WD NAS and it looks like it has crappy write performance, so copying filed up to your device could be slow. Synology also includes free dyndns subscription so you can find your device out on the internets. WD has ARM processor single core 2ghz vs atom dual core 2ghz in the ds 412. The ds 412 also has an intel chip that will benefit from AES instruction sets if you use encryption. I also am a huge fan of PLEX which streams and transcodes (changes to file format on the fly to one supported by your device). Actually the ds 412 apps (not plex, just the stock synology apps) will actually transcode for you as well. See www.synology.com/en-global/support/FAQ/577. Finally, I googled a few reviews of the WD NAS and it looks like it has crappy write performance, so copying filed up to your device... » Read More WD has ARM processor single core 2ghz vs atom dual core 2ghz in the ds 412. The ds 412 also has an intel chip that will benefit from AES instruction sets if you use encryption. I also am a huge fan of PLEX which streams and transcodes (changes to file format on the fly to one supported by your device). Actually the ds 412 apps (not plex, just the stock synology apps) will actually transcode for you as well. See www.synology.com/en-global/support/FAQ/577. Finally, I googled a few reviews of the WD NAS and it looks like it has crappy write performance, so copying filed up to your device could be slow. Synology also includes free dyndns subscription so you can find your device out on the internets. « Show Less
1267418
I agree, it is unethical to have the exact same hardware and not enable all of the features. Further make the better model only available at one location for the same price. I have the 2500 and have made it my quest to make it a 2550. So far I have edited the firmware and nearly had it beat. There is some security protocol or checksum that is preventing the upgrade. Since editing the latest version of the firmware does not seem to be working in the short term, I am going to try and take the firmware back to the earliest version I can find and maybe make some magic happen that way. If anybody figures this out let me know, I'll do the same. I agree, it is unethical to have the exact same hardware and not enable all of the features. Further make the better model only available at one location for the same price. I have the 2500 and have made it my quest to make it a 2550. So far I have edited the firmware and nearly had it beat. There is some security protocol or checksum that is preventing the upgrade. Since editing the latest version of the firmware does not seem to be working in the short term, I am going to try and take the firmware back to the earliest version I can find and maybe make some magic happen that way. If... » Read More I agree, it is unethical to have the exact same hardware and not enable all of the features. Further make the better model only available at one location for the same price. I have the 2500 and have made it my quest to make it a 2550. So far I have edited the firmware and nearly had it beat. There is some security protocol or checksum that is preventing the upgrade. Since editing the latest version of the firmware does not seem to be working in the short term, I am going to try and take the firmware back to the earliest version I can find and maybe make some magic happen that way. If anybody figures this out let me know, I'll do the same. « Show Less
164979
http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1FRAME/showpage.html?name=IFAM.E363702&ccnshorttitle=Light-emitting-diode+Surface-mounted+Luminaires&objid=1083443495&cfgid=1073741824&version=versionless&parent_id=1079431152&sequence=1 You can google anything
968394
Depends on the firmware version, but this tip may help: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-wireless-networking-41/linksys-wusb54gc-v3-lucid-10-04-fine-out-of-box-w-minor-change-821123/
1673200
I think you're referring to the hardware version, not the firmware version. Seems like luck of the draw when you order. I purchased one of these around october 2013 and received a hardware v1 model. Just purchased a 2nd for another location and it is v2.
739612
I was wondering the same thing, but it seems like there might be support for it. This page specifically mentions Wireless 7260: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi
1364693
Ah... it's a good question. Somehow, the cord of FPA80UW is very short as you questioned. FPA80UW is an upper model than FPA40UW, but the cord of FPA80UW is shorter than FPA40UW. Why?