How do colors compare to photo displays?
23546
The one that I purchased was very close to what was displayed. It stands up well, I have a dog that insists on getting on the bed (she is a lab ) and it hasn't hurt the bed spread.
23547
The colors are pretty much what you see. I tend to change spring/summer quilts often. I will continue to buy my Colormate comforters at Sears for $20 (on sale) so I can feel the material.
23548
The colors were pretty accurate but when it came it had such a strong smell it took several washings to get rid of it-also, I did not like the material it was made from.
23549
It's fairly accurate. Overall I'm pleased. Now granted it doesn't look like Ralph Lauren, Pottery Barn or Nordstrom but remember the price.
1381745
contrast ratio is one thing. From store display, my eyes prefer sony or samsumg. For some reason Toshiba and LG doesn't attract my eyes as much. Store test is the best.
199486
Although the display is color, nighttime images are pretty much black and white unless there is a strong light source, typical of video cameras in general, the less light the less color comes through. IR only images are also like viewing B&W.; Color and picture are superb in full sunshine.
485015
Thanks for your response. So... Is there any difference in picture quality?
846191
There is a slight shade difference. Flip between the pictures looking carefully and you will see it
386540
Hi Marcel:Thanks, that information is really helpful. Can you comment on the accuracy and acceptability of the color when you use the WD TV media hub to show jpeg photos on an HDTV? I realize this can be quite subjective, but if you have used a WD TV to show jpegs on an HDTV, I would be interested in your comments.Thanks, Richard
732740
Oh yes. You will notice the difference in a heartbeat. Forget photographic work... Even outlook and other desktop applications are washed out
1243594
Color gamut and contrast ratio are actually about the same level of importance. You want both to be very good. They're also somewhat interrelated.Also, static contrast ratio is more important than dynamic contrast ratio (it's pretty easy to increase dynamic contrast ratio without improving actual picture quality one iota - just completely turn the backlight off when the screen goes black), and the difference between the 61 and the 65 isn't very significant in that regard.
669399
when I ordered I selected the primary colors, the Picture that was displayed at the time of ordering was also in primary colors. I'm not sure with this actual display!
1117554
Depends on which mode. I don't have it here, but I believe it's blue when receiving, orange when transmitting (that may be backwards). There are up to 5 different display colors that are user settable - I think
385167
It is the same color. Each computer screen shows colors differently so I can't say it is "exactly".
64682
They seem consistent to me. I use it for CAD work and my second monitor is used mostly for menus. I did quick check by dragging a picture from one monitor to the other and I couldn't see any difference. I down loaded the software from NVidia and am able to have different color setting for each monitor, but have not needed to do so.
146685
I don't have the answer to your question. I also like to take photos, not a Pro, but I found the colors of this monitor are very accurate. My printed photos back from the lab are exactly as showing on the monitor.
1443065
Colors look different on different monitors. The color I got was o.k., I didn't notice a difference from online.
2185607
Doubtful, at the price point this monitor is designed for general use. Also, I haven't seen any professional reviews of anyone measuring the accuracy of sRGB and/or Adobe RGB coverage. If you're concerned about color accuracy, this monitor also uses a TN panel not an IPS panel that you'd find in higher-end sudo-professional or higher monitors such as the pro series BenQ monitors or the Dell Ultrasharp series.
1700528
Hi Mr Tivadar, We were photo scanner designers for more than a decade before we established piQx, and therefore know well the difficulty faced by designers with regard to color accuracy versus vividness. Color vividness works against accuracy and vice versa. In the original version 1.0 of the xcanex software, we've tuned its color reproduction more towards vividness rather than accuracy. However we later realized that the majority of xcanex customers prefer color accuracy than vividness. Hence in later versions of the software, we've re-tuned the color algorithm to produce more accurate color, and yet maintain its vibrancy. Furthermore in our latest software update v2.107, not only color accuracy is improved, but we also managed to increase photo scanning's dynamic range. An important aspect to note about color accuracy is that it not only depends on the input device (scanner) but also the output device (printer, LCD screen). Therefore if ultimate color accuracy is required, a total color calibration system is required. However for most use cases this is not required and so long as natural colors (e.g. skin tone, sky, tree leaf) appear realistic, it serves their purposes. So what we can say about xcanex's color accuracy is that natural colors appear realistic enough and do not differ significantly from those produced by well-known flatbed photo scanners. piQx Team
103278
Just got off the phone with Pantone. It gives you the RGB of the closest Pantone color. For my application, that's probably good enough.