How is the image quality with the attached lenses? Is it blurred as as one of the previewers says ?
775093
There is no quick answer as it depends on the computer in your camera. I have a Fuji HS20 that captures sharp colorful images until I tried adding attachable lens. The images were soft and the colors dull and muddy. The software in the camera was not able to adjust to an additional lens. I was able to return the set of lens I had ordered so with just a little trouble and some postage my experiment was painless. Make sure of the return policy before you order the lenses. Ciao, Jackie
775094
I have a Fuji HS50 and the lenses didn't work at all. They fit the camera, but the images were grossly blurred. I returned the lenses.
775095
I bought one since 1 year ago, I didn't like it, the autofocus didn't work with my camera , also it's gave me a black frame when i use the wide range of my camera. in short words it's waste of money :(
478530
I assume you are talking about the two small lenses shown in the picture. They are very cheap Vivitar lenses. One is macro and the other is wide angle, both are garbage. The rest of the bundle is fairly decent though.
935597
It's very close in quality to its 1.4 counterpart. The L version has a very slight edge in contrast and sharpness. I opted for the 35mm f2 IS because the difference wasn't large enough for me to justify spending twice as much for the 1.4.Hope this helps!
1936777
If you look at my prior answers, you will see that I had to have my lens calibrated to my D800 specifically. I don't know that that makes it of poor quality. Once I got it back from Sigma (who were very helpful and quick, by the way), it is absolutely beastly in focus lock, focus speed, and image quality.
1713858
The eye piece view is crisp and clear, had problems at first getting them to focus but playing with them I found that if I use my 2x Barlow lens the focus was great, so if you think this might be a problem I would suggest you take this advice when choosing your lenses. I ordered two 12mm lenses to go with the bino viewer and it cut it down to a 6mm because of the 2x Barlow.
90061
it depends on the design of the lens. It won't affect the image quality though.
896153
No I did not notice blurriness around the left and right sides. For the price the lens did ok.
417818
I am happy with mine. Unless you are going to spend the value of the camera base on a lens or more, should be fine.
1080981
check your lens for fingerprints. Got a bunch of pix one time blurry because of that.
1556647
Hi. I ended up returning it since the quality of the image was so poor compared with what I was used to.
518570
It seems as good or better than other ultra-compacts I've had. In low light it does indeed look grainy at times, but interestingly enough, the picture doesn't, it is often much better. Of course, your results may vary, but I think it's pretty good for this price point.
486892
Yes, the image is very clear. The camera you select will also influence image quality.
923562
It isn't blurry at all. Be sure to select the correct shading. I'm sorry I didn't get the darkest shade, it's good but could be better.
1329593
This is a good quality lens. Yes you can preserve the original f2.8. As regards image quality I don't have a laboratory to measure such things but there certainly isn't the obvious problem with distortion or focus out near the edges that you see with cheaper lenses. I'm sorry I can't be more specific.
1728847
There will be some distortion, similar to any lens up through probably 25mm. It is very subtle if noticeable at all unless you are right up on the structure. Easily correctable in LR5. Nothing like UWA or FE for distortion.
1564874
It is ok. the lenses are not that I great. I should just get the camera without the lenses.
1253597
Strictly image quality, Nothing a non professional would notice. The lens is much more sturdy and the IS has saved me on more than one occasion, especially in low light. The IS version is worth it IMHO