1366x768 pixels or 1920x1080?
749370
1920x1080 but you might need glasses for some things :) but clarity is excellent
1163204
Thanks for the extra information, interesting about the rectangular pixels. This seems like a much bigger project than I thought it was going to be. I tried a lot of resolutions and found one that appears to leave only one column of pixels on the right side unused. It's 430x222. Funny how a single digit can make a significant difference.
1477144
It can display 1920 X 1200, but 1440 X 900 is easier on the eyes and what I use.
471862
I'm curious how the computer linked with to the large plasma screen looks. I would think that 1024 x 768 on such a large screen might look a bit fuzzy or pixelated. Do you see problems with this? Would you recommend going for a higher resolution?
800966
Your computer's resolution is only limited by the video card and the current monitor. 1920 x 1080 is really just a standard HDTV resolution (16:9) but most all widescreen *computer* (monitor) resolutions are 16:10, so 1920 x 1200 is perfectly normal and since you already have a 1920 wide res to start with, the option to expand to 1920 x 1200 *should* show up as soon as the new monitor is connected and detected by the computer. If it does not, then you might indeed have to upgrade your video card IF you really want to use the max res. For example, my original resolution was 1024 x 768 (4:3) on my previous monitor. With the T260HD, I was able to change to 1600 x 1200 (also 4:3) which, on the T260HD, does have "black bars" on the side. I suspect it is simply because my video card is outdated that I cannot get the max res and so I should get one that definitely has widescreen capabilities, but it has not been that important lately so I've just not done it yet. I hope that helps! XD PS. Also, when you have the max res of a 16:10 screen, ie 1920 x 1200, you will always have "black bars" on the top and bottom of proper 1080 (or any 16:9) footage when displayed correctly. That can bother some ppl, so it depends on what you want to use the monitor for mainly, ie if you plan to watch a lot of shows on it or just for computer stuff. Altho of course, depending on your media player (on the comp) or when you are watching tv, you will also have the options to crop or zoom the picture which can fill the screen if you don't mind losing the edges as long as you can escape the "black bars". Just some food for thought ;P
1981975
I would get a video card that can support that resolution. I often struggled just using 1920x1080 with this cpu. Not sure what the max is but I would go no further then 1920x1080.
762582
1600 by 1200 means that the resolution is a high definition pixels card in HD it should work just fine
1545275
Yes, 640 "480" pixels and 1920 "1080" it is the resolution. The P or I is a little more complex but it means progressive or interlaced. Progressive gives the full frame every frame but interlaced with give horizontal frame and then the vertical frame back and forth. Progressive is much better than interlaced because it is capable of giving more full frames per second. Imagine 60 frames per second, you would get 30 horizontal frames and 30 vertical with interlaced. With progressive you would get all 60 vertical and horizontal at the same time, as the whole picture doesn't go back and forth. The end result is a more fluent picture with progressive. I'm not a pro or anything but this is my general understanding.
1094652
Mine is 1600x900 but specs I've seen online show 1366x768. But mine is also a few years old and the i5 version.
805671
2880x1800, I believe. Haven't tried that myself; use 1920x1200. Your best move would be to visit an Apple Store, if possible, to actually view the different resolutions and decide whether it works for you.
1396639
The one I received is 1024x600. You can also check the resolution in Windows by right-clicking the desktop and going to "properties" or "personalize".
1836880
If you have a single link dvi cable, it should display 1920 x 1080. Dual link dvi cable are for 2560 x 1600 or 1440.Check to make sure you have the right cable.
1681498
I'm leaning towards the 2159M for the following reasons: Max Resolution 2009M = 1600 x 900 2159M = 1920 x 1080 Pixel Pitch: 2009M = 0.277mm 2159M = 0.248mm Connectors: 2009M = D-Sub, DVI-D 2159M = D-Sub, DVI, HDMI Bottom line, for a bit for cash there's a sizable increase in real estate with the increase in resolution. I'd check em out in person first [should be able to find them all at Best Buy right now]. And I was considering the 2009M until I did see them side by side and realized the 2159M was the better selection [for me]. Hope this helps.
1673996
If you are asking about resolution, the top resolution is 1920 x 1080 pixels. Hope this helps!
1030441
1280x800 around 720p HD not full1080p HD if you want something in full HD look for asus memo pad FHD on amazon.
715981
1920x1080 pixel full HD native resolution. This things a beauty. It's a dual monitor setup with the latest iMac and looks better
910671
I'm not sure, but I get greater than 1080p on my monitors, which are 1920x1200. Much will probably depend on the max resolution supported by your PC's video card. HTH.