Has anyone tried pushing this film to, say, 600?
753637
I've pushed Ilford HP5+ to 800, 1600, and 3200. granted the negative got thinner, but the grain was awesome. I used Kodak HC-110. HP5+ is awesome for pushing.
799874
It should be able to. As long as it says 600 film in the loader, then you're good.
1636271
try zooming in closer when trying fine detail. Make resolution of file you are making at least 300/dpi. Its a work around, but for $500 it would be a steal. I think its overpriced at USD 599. But couldn't ever afford ( justify to self ) Cintique, even the cheapie.
2237058
Yes, If you start to watch a video, push the right arrow it will say 4x push again until it goes as fast as you want it goes up to 16x. (ive had this camera for months and just realized last month I can do this)
1844733
Sorry Mathhew but i did not attempt that. i simply downloaded the files to the media card and played it on my home television. i do think its a great little camera.
1220275
I have a polaroid 600 camera and it works well with that - the 660 APPEARS to be the same type but perhaps you can communicate directly with the "Impossible Film" folks to confirm. But short of that just take the risk, which is what I did. PS: The important difference between this film and the original film is that immediately after the picture spits out of the camera, you must put it someplace dark (e.g. in a closed drawer) for at least 1/2 hour or preferably an hour. This is surprising because the original film would develop out in the broad daylight; My guess is that the chemicals used in the original are either banned or expensive now. That's all I know.
221782
Yes, I get from 60 all the way up to 150 frames (sometimes higher) on maxed out settings. 16 Chuncks, Fancy pretty much everything turned up to its highest.
677412
I don't know. I never tried. I did post a brief video once. It was shot in 1080P nice high definition, but when it appeared on Facebook it was so grainy it was unwatchable. Probably my fault for not being very tech-savvy.
1228495
Not sure, you may have to set the recording size to the smallest format: 30fps,
1671778
Just read through my instructions on my comment and go by that and you'd be surprised. I know it sounds funny but make sure your film is the same temp as your ipad screen and don't be in a hurry. I have been through so many, but this one for me was the easiest. just don't get into a hurry.
1647044
Haven't done it myself but if you really wanted to you could set up a machine with a screen capture going and that would record all that was coming in - like Camtasia. Think you'd really need to tweak the settings to not fill up a 100gb/hour or something absurd
424060
600. And it has been discontinued but then relaunched under the Impossible Project. The film is more expensive than the camera.
2206602
I normally do not go beyond the rated ISO of a film in the development stage. When I want a higher speed I purchase that speed film since I do not like to risk an image. When one push develops film, the entire roll of film should be shot at the assumed ISO, then hope that it comes out.
495669
Digital is not as easy as film was. I would say it was close, but too many factors are in the formula now. 50mm was the standard used with 35mm film, and 600mm was 30x, now I have seen 25mm to 28mm as standard. With 25mm as a base standard, 600mm would be 24x. You have a semiconductor picking up the image and microprocessor creating it.
2130984
Yes, as long as it says 600 film inside the film receptacle, then you're gold.
1597226
I'm sorry but I haven't tried that yet . I am kind of disappointed by the quality of the video myself . Not too enthused by it . It can't record high speed action like it's said to be able to do.
1477305
I've had mine for over a year now and have recorded about 350 in the 6 hour per disk format (better quality in 2 hour format) and although the picture isn't High Def I can still see it good enough for me! Mind you I'm 64 and the Blue Ray stuff doesn't faze me. Just give me a movie with a story! Wayne Arthur