How would this work on a .22 at shorter ranges (13-35 yards). Does it produce a clear, sharp image?
752924
I'm using this scope on my 22-250. it's a very bright and clear scope. At 13-35 yrds it should be clear.
259666
I own the Firefield, my shooting friend has the Barska. We both agree mine is clearer, and a little sharper 300 yards, and farther. His lens has a yellow cast when viewing thru the lens.
1443342
I have this and if you do not have the pro sightmark recticle, it will be blury and or have a double image. It is frustrating at best. For someting that you want to be accurate at 100 yds, go with a decent scope like a Nikon 4.5-14 x 40 BDC and you will be extremly glad you did. I'm 56 and it is hard for the old eyes to see a 22 size hole in a target at a distance. This is my best sugestion. The red dot recticle is great for close proximity shooting, not so much for longer shooting, Target, etc.
188190
the glr225 is no good in bright sun.buy a target to aim at or and old auto reg. plate works good in sun.i have aimed at the top of a tall tree and had a reading as long as the beam was on the wood and ambient light was very low (near dark )
954322
it does. i have it on a Mini 14 right now. sighted in at about 100 yards and it has done very well since i re-sighted it for that 100 yards about 6 months ago.
1898128
It's ok at it's shortest range. Low light and long distance usually don't make a great combo. Even though it's a 30mm tube, it doesn't gather light too well on an object that's 500+yds away.
1775182
It is not real bright in daylight, especially sun. So I would not try it at an outdoor range at any distance. For rifles, it is best to use dim light conditions like dawn and dusk and I have used it on a rifle at about 30 yards to get the scope onto the bore. You will still need to fine tune the scope at a range but you will waste a lot less ammo. For the handgun, I have used it in daylight at about 50 feet and it was easily visible. I used it to align a clip on laser with the bore. And range testing verified that it worked well.
2118942
I've only used it up to 50 yards. I can perfectly see the bullet holes perfectly. Try using some of those birchwood shoot n see targets. I used it for my ak74 which makes holes about the size of a .22. My guess is that you'll be ok if you use shoot n see targets
388179
I have found that it produces acceptable images in fairly low light. I don't try to take pictures in almost total darkness so I have no experience there. Under a full moon it took acceptable pictures of animals in my yard. HTH
1509470
I gave theP-22 BDC scope to my son-in-law. We both tested it out on fine Fall day. It was awesome, it worked just like the add said on an AR15. We zeroed at 50 yards using a range finder then set up targets out to one hundred. The 100 yard target was composed of 4x4 inch plates hanging from a saw horse type set up. We never missed at any of the targets and it was awesome hearing the ping after each shot. Because of that I just bought a .22 caliber for myself in AR15 model. I am planning to buy two more of these scope, one for myself and one for my son. Sorry I don't know the eye relief but I believe it is available on the Nikon website. My son-in law has the scope and loves it. I gave theP-22 BDC scope to my son-in-law. We both tested it out on fine Fall day. It was awesome, it worked just like the add said on an AR15. We zeroed at 50 yards using a range finder then set up targets out to one hundred. The 100 yard target was composed of 4x4 inch plates hanging from a saw horse type set up. We never missed at any of the targets and it was awesome hearing the ping after each shot. Because of that I just bought a .22 caliber for myself in AR15 model. I am planning to buy two more of these scope, one for myself and one for my son. Sorry I don't know the eye relief but... » Read More I gave theP-22 BDC scope to my son-in-law. We both tested it out on fine Fall day. It was awesome, it worked just like the add said on an AR15. We zeroed at 50 yards using a range finder then set up targets out to one hundred. The 100 yard target was composed of 4x4 inch plates hanging from a saw horse type set up. We never missed at any of the targets and it was awesome hearing the ping after each shot. Because of that I just bought a .22 caliber for myself in AR15 model. I am planning to buy two more of these scope, one for myself and one for my son. Sorry I don't know the eye relief but I believe it is available on the Nikon website. My son-in law has the scope and loves it. « Show Less
971569
The way that I have used CamRanger had no long range need. I usually use it for bracketing HDR imagery. It also is great for focus stacking. I do use it as a remote firing mechanism however it only about 75 feet or so. (Birds on a feeder photographed from a blind). Sorry I cannot be more help!
784844
I use mine with an AR15 in .223 with a 20 inch bull barrel and the elevation marks seem to work well with the basic zero at 100 yds. I think this scope is not intended for .22. I use a BSA sweet .22 scope with my Remington 597 with good results at 100 yds to 200 with adjustments easy.
1195780
it has great visibility, sharp, crisp, worked well on .22LR only one problem, it went out of focus after a couple of uses lens inside turned sideways ?? it was useless after that,other than that no other issues, will not buy again.
629121
The image quality is good, particularly for the price. Its sharper & brighter than my Nikon binoculars and not quite as good as my pricier Zeiss monocular. For objects at 300 yards, you probably want something with a higher magnification.
1664771
In a word; probably. The Celestron is quite adequate. Way back I had a smaller B&L; which was sharper, but did not have the magnification I sought.I use the Celestron strictly for rifle shooting out to a max of 300 yards. Bright enough but seems to have a very small amber ring around the perimeter.
1283679
Yes, the image is sharp and clear on a considerably bigger distance. But I doubt that you can use reading tables or use it for target shooting in order to spot holes left from gun shots. It is a job for x20-80 scopes.
199417
Yes it will work fine. I have it on a couple of guns, 300 Ultra Mag, 220 swift and 7mm Ultra and it works fine. The clarity at 32 power is not that great but for the money it does what my Nightforce dose only cheaper and not quite as clear. But I would recommend it, I do a lot of long range hunting for ground hogs and crop damage deer out to 800-900 yards.