Is the 4x2 true matrix HDMI 1.4 compatible or 1.3b?
769233
Sorry, I don't have access to that anymore. It did work great though to send a signal to projectors and sound booth monitors
769234
It seems to be 1.4 for audio because it passes all high resolution multi-channel audio signals with no problems. I have not used it for 3D video but it does pass 1080p at 24 frames per second. I have not used it for any 4k material.
769235
I Use the HDMI 1.4 and no issues - this may help: http://www.audioholics.com/hdtv-formats/understanding-difference-hdmi-versions
952462
Previous two answers are no longer correct. Nvidia's gtx 970 and 980 have hdmi 2.0 out.
1126227
Max supported is 2x4 (and that's what I'm using), but you can find articles that claim 2x8 works.
2087147
HDMI 1.3 and 1.4 both are rated at the same MHZ and bandwidth, so it should work based off of specs, however, 1.4 allows for the use of "ARC", audio return channel. I do not know if it will support ARC.
529112
Hi Thank you for your interest but I'm sorry Intergrated(on-board) graphic chip can not support 2560x1440 resolution directly. So we can't guarantee the compatibility. Thanks.
1132029
Quick answer is I do not know. the manual does not tell us about which HDMI spec is supported by the unit. However 1.3 that supports 3D was introduced in 2006, and these receivers were designed in 2008, so they should (most likely) support 3D. But 3d is going bye bye anyway, so it might be a moot point. Good luck, the unit I have has been reliable and a good sounding unit.
1046004
I'm not 100% certain, but some cursory research suggests that that chipset is only capable of 1920x1200 over HDMI.
668354
Dear Damon, Thank you for your question regarding our HDMI cables. Our cables are fully compatible with v1.4a as well as any previous versions of HDMI. Please contact us at service@bluerigger.com if you have any additional questions. Thanks, BlueRigger LLC service@bluerigger.com
750225
Elhassan, there is nothing on the packaging to indicate that these cables are 3D compatible. These cables have been designed to meet the performance standards set by HDMI 1.4 and have passed stringent Category 2 testing. They are backward compatible to all previous versions. Sincerely, SteveC.
1626856
don't use hdmi. use mini displayport ("Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort Cable" is like $5 on amazon) to display 2560 x 1080 perfectly.
189930
i believe so. I have used about 20 of these and have yet to have any not work with any hdmi cables used or devices I buy- and I am pretty sure most if not all were 1.4
1793220
Spec sheet doesn't specify which version of 4K HDMI Video output/up scaler - probably a question best posed to Sony.
1251962
The reality is tricky. The ports are HDMI 2.0, but only in that they support 4:2:0 chroma subsampling. The display itself is only capable of 4:4:0 (which isn't a valid HDMI subsampling mode), so the higher bandwidth mode of HDMI2 is not actually used (or supported) and you're stuck with half-resolution chroma (in both X and Y) with your 4k luminance. That's fine for games and movies, but bad for sharp, colored text and drawings.
1219952
Well, there is no real 1.4 or 2.0, it is rated by the speed of the cable. The Ultra series can handle anything. If you are worried about 4K, don't. 4K is only a difference in hardware, no change to cable specs. I have had this cable for a couple of years now and it has been performing flawlessly from my pc's GeForce GTX 650 graphics card to my 1080p tv.
1101386
This one has HDMI 1.3 instead of 1.2, and supports DTS 5.1. The older one you have doesn't natively decode DTS. It's only passthru. Those are the major differences I know about.
1020344
Nope, I ran it with 1 4gb dim And 3 mixed dims. Use whatever combo you want!
635392
Yes, that is correct. You can't send the output over HDMI, only via the 5.1 analog outputs.