Buy the DC17 or DC25: Can anyone help me out?
779963
The DC17 is an older model which Dyson no longer sells direct but is still available online and in some stores. The DC28 replaced it and is the newest non-ball animal model. The biggest difference between them is weight and suction: the DC17 weighs 33 pounds versus 20.61 pounds for the DC28, and 24 pounds for the ball DC25. The DC28 has more suction: 245 air watts versus 220 air watts for both the DC17 and the DC25. I don't have either model: I have the older DC14 Dyson Animal which, after 6 years, still has amazing suction (it has the 5/8 gallon bin). In comparing the DC25 Animal ball to the DC28 Animal, the big difference (beyond the ball technology which gives the DC25 more maneuverability) is the size of the gallon bin: DC25 has 1/3 gallon bin versus the DC28's larger 5/8 gallon bin, so you will be emptying the DC25 more frequently, which could be a pain if you have long haired cats or dogs which shed frequently; so that's the trade-off, also there is a price difference although Amazon has good discounts on both models. My DC14 does clog but it can be easily cleaned by taking the canister off completely (it comes off with the push of a button), and wiping it down with a damp paper towel or sponge. If you can't get all the small holes unclogged doing that, you can use the end of a paper clip or tiny screwdriver to stick in the holes and push out any remaining debris. It is a bit annoying to have to do only because Dyson advertises that you never need to do this. I also rinse out the bin from time to time (they provide instructions for doing this). Hope this helps in making a decision which model to buy.
848951
These carson 3d binocs (TD-842ED is what I have) compare most favorably with the Nikon MK5's and the Vortex vipersI have looked at both and can say I see no real difference, Carson may even be slightly better. I look at things like close focus capabilty, speed of focus (how far do you have to spin the focus wheel to get from minimum to maximum), feel, durability, ease of use (how fast can you "get on" a target like a small bird, for instance) warranty (lifetime for carson, even if you are to blame for the problem!), etc. I don't know anything about zen ray! ew
1543502
You CAN use the 18v XRP in the DC500. I use one in mine. It's a great vac, I'm on my second one, I wore the first one out!
451555
Hello V. - you may notice a difference as the AC1750 gives "ultimate" coverage vs the AC1600 giving the best coverage. Hope this helps.
508895
from what I've read the only difference is that the animal model come with the mini head. I never found them to be that useful in general. I was researching the same two option and I'm leaning towards the standard DC25
2174721
I have a 20D. The answer is, it depends on what you want to do. The EF 24-70 and the 70-200 both have the "red stripe" and are top-of-the-line, awesome lenses. They rely on big optics with the 77mm objective lens to produce their images. They are great at all times, especiallhy in low light. They are also very heavy and quite expensive. Get them if you are going for absolute, uncompromising photos. Get a tripod or monopod, too, unless you do arm curls in your spare time! If you want excellent photos with less weight and expense, I recommend you get the EF 17-85 IS as your base lens for light weight and convenience. (If you get the "base" 18-55, you will find you quit using it the day you get a newer lens. We have a Digital Rebel that came with that lens, and we never use it. Never. Did I say "Never?" Buy a body or a kit with the 17-85 unless you are going the 24-70 route. The 18-55 only adds about $50 to the camera price, which isn't much compared to the price of the camera bodies, but why waste $50?) For telephoto zoom, the 70-300 IS is an excellent lens, about the same weight and size as the 24-70 but of course much more versatile. Then you will need a wide-angle, and again you have two ways you can go. I have a 10-22 lens that was less costly than Canon's red-stripe wide angles, and I am well-pleased. You get some parallax below a focal length of 12-14, but it's kind of a neat effect if you like it. I hope this helps.
1743465
should i get a ball dyson or reg. dyson? dc25 has two colors. whats the difference?
249987
Thank you for your inquiry and great question.. The NAD 1050 and 3020 are both great units and both sell for $499. The NAD 1050 is designed from the ground up as a Digital to Analog convertor (DAC). This unit features TWO coax digital inputs, TWO optical inputs as well as a USB input. Of great importance is that ALL digital inputs support resolutions up to 24/192. The D1050 also has single ended and balanced XLR analog outputs. The D3020 is designed as a Hybrid product and is both a DAC and an Integrated amplifier. This unit has a single coax, optical and USB input and supports 24/192 content using coax and/or optical and 24/96 using USB. This unit is 30 wpc into 8 ohms. Lastly, the D3020 supports Blutooth connectivity. If you need a great DAC, you'll want to buy the 1050. If you are looking for a great, all around integrated amp then you will want the 3020. I hope this explanation helps and please don't hesitate to reply with any additional questions! Thank you, Scott G and the rest of the ListenUp.com sales team
2217900
Looks like the Nikoplex to me. I have the M-308 with the BDC and I would hold out for that, especially since they're selling it to you full price. The undiscounted price is greatly inflated over retail. Not a bargain unless you get what you want. BTW, this is an awesome scope, and the BDC is a great tool when teamed with the Spot-On software. Good luck!
1192315
I own both. Bought one of first 18-200s made in Japan to go with my first dslr: D50 that I got for a trip to the Bahamas. Have wonderful images I still enjoy. Now have lightweight D5000 and super D7000. Bought 18-140 for light weight to hike w/D5000. Use 28-200 w/D7000 otherwise.Both focus quickly, iq is similar. Both have VR but 200 has active mode for shooting while moving, which I love. So 140 wins on weight, price, while 200 adds focal length and versatile VR.
2254947
Thanks for the good info. I had a Canon Rebel that I returned because of picture quality with the standard kit lens. I have been trying to decide between the Nikon D90 & the Pentax K20D. I am going to go with the K20D and start with the 18-250 and see how far I go. So I am off to shop now. Again... Thanks a lot.
1994671
The DC50 is just more compact and in my opinion even more powerful with the double cyclone head... it may have a few less tools included, but you can always buy those afterwords... for my 1.5K sq. ft. apt. (about 3/4 tile. and the rest medium carpet). The DC 50 is awesome!!!
318618
I found both of these resources very helpful. I'm throwing another dyson into the mix because if you feel the higher price and power of the DC58 handheld is worth the value ($250 or so), you may want to consider the DC35 animal which can be found for a similar price. The DC35 is more like a handheld vacuum with many accessories. DC34 versus DC58 http://www.infobarrel.com/DC34_Vs_DC58 Comparison of DC 35 animal versus DC 34 Based on the comparison below- it looks like the DC58 (described in the above link, which doesn't come with all the DC35 animal accessories and motorized attachments) may have a better battery (cobalt manganese vs lithium ion). I also cannot tell whether the DC 35 animal has a V6 motor or a V2 motor like the DC34. If anyone can answer this I'd be interested http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2s8mfUkIDWY Here's what I gather so far DC58- more expensive but far superior power and battery functioning- it may come with one motorized tool head but that's it DC 34- less expensive but less power and battery life DC 35 about the cost of DC58, lots of accessories including power accessories, but probably not as powerful as the DC58 from what I can tell. Still deciding
657160
Spend the extra $50 and get a Vortex 2-7 BDC. Loads of eye relief, fantastic optics and the best customer service there is. It will cost you less in the long run.
1848167
Can't help with what comes after the D250. Looking at Mod KAV60, display has a 40 pin connection, you should be fine. Got one for my daughter a couple years ago, she's still happy.
2051177
Get a Dyson animal, either the DC15 or DC17, you will not regret it. The reviews are actually quite good, 4.5 stars.
2004640
Which one did you finish up with? I'm interested because you said that you shoot mainly lanscapes, so why would you part with the 17-40mm? If your option had been for the 16-35mm f2.8L, I could have understood the reason, but a 24mm lens on any new camera (assuming it's not a film body, 5D or 1Ds) is only going to give you 31mm (1D) or 38mm (the rest). Not much good for landscape work.BTW, the 24-70mm eats the 24-105mm alive when it comes to contrast and sharpness, IS or not!