Is there a sound quality difference between the SHS8100/28 (previous model without mic/control) and the SHS8105A/28 (new model with mic)?
762574
I've been buying these headphones for years, and I haven't noticed a change in sound quality for better or worse. It's the exact same to me.
2004122
If you don't want the microphone at all you can look at the WS-55 model, but the sound quality for that is not as good as this model.You can still listen with these fine, the microphone only works if you receive a call while it's plugged in.
1336893
I can't speak to the performance differences (if any). I purchased the CPM1084 because I needed a replacement. I bought my receiver used and the microphone that came with it was not functioning properly.
1750908
I think its comparable but to be honest its not a good mic. I think it's either refurbished or a cheap fake. People complained about squealing when set anywhere above 4--5 using it below those settings makes it a useless purchase. I'm shopping for a replacement.
855905
Sorry, I don't know the difference in the models, but they do sound very similar in the description.
1682412
If you're asking about the price difference between the two PX 100-II models, the "i" ($72ish) has a three-button control for volume/pause/etc. and a mic for use with a phone. Besides that, I understand that they are the same headphones, drives, construction, etc.
2210217
The microphone is the same. It was originally sold with a cable, or "less cable" (LC). I suppose the LC package with a cable has a cable from a source other than Shure, or maybe both do.
893676
I found no other differences between the two. As a matter of fact, I purchased one of each mic and I can not tell the difference between them.
1884668
900 has more detail and separation than the Shures. The only problem with the 900 is the "connection" issue. That is why I returned mine.
596641
The 7800's microphone audio quality and overall comfort were HUGE improvements over the 7600. I can not recommend the 7600 at all. The 7800 is however top notch, only the best Plantronics models compete.
1917218
I have not seen any difference other than a little different styling. A different year perhaps? It sounds the same and it has the same on/off switch, volume controls, etc.
1057667
Apart from the Mike difference as told by many reviewers, the 10-10 seems to be using the Bluetooth 2.1 version and the 10-11 seems to be using the Bluetooth 3.0 verison
202241
With the audio range of those headphones you should notice a difference. I have an old Creative Headset with Mic & as old as they are they sounded better. The newer headsets like yours, handles a better range of sound. My brother has a Creative T6 series which is a 2.1series Creative wireless system which handles 2.1-5.1 sound. It sounds great, which is the reason I got it. I have an older Creative 5.1 system & it's sound quality has improved. Hope this helps.
1038304
2 mics I absolutely hate: Sennheiser 835 (congested), Shure SM58 (muddy). Depending on your vocal range, get a Sennheiser 935, or any Audix OM-2/3/5 ... Shure Betas sound brighter but too "fragile". I personally don't care for any condenser mics because of the way it changes the dynamics of a person's voice. Condensers may be fine for instruments though.
893673
As far as use with Speech Recognition there is no difference. If the mic is being used for singing the SE50 has a flatter frequency resonce which is better for that purpose.KnowBrainer, Inc.
891568
Yes and no. Steelseries claimed it was fixed but sent me an RMA with the same issue. They recently announced a new Siberia Elite headset line (you can find it on their website), which one would assume, has fixed the old Siberia Elite issue, along with better microphones and whatnot. It appears like they might be abandoning the obviously defunct SE and moving on with the newer model. However, that doesn't mean there aren't decent pairs of SE still out there. I'd buy at your own risk.
1404937
No, sound is fine in both models. The second has a good microphone that didn't work on the first type.