EPL-1 vs EPL-2 for a beginner. I am a beginning photog and the EPL1 or EPL2 will be my first "real" camera, I previously owned a Canon SD1000. What benefits are gained by getting the EPL2? The price difference is over $200, not a big deal but what are the differences? EPL-1 vs EPL-2 for a beginner. I am a beginning photog and the EPL1 or EPL2 will be my first "real" camera, I previously owned a Canon SD1000. What benefits are gained by getting the... » Read More EPL-1 vs EPL-2 for a beginner. I am a beginning photog and the EPL1 or EPL2 will be my first "real" camera, I previously owned a Canon SD1000. What benefits are gained by getting the EPL2? The price difference is over $200, not a big deal but what are the differences? « Show Less
106720
At $399, the E-PL1 is one of the best buys around. I shoot Nikon full frame cameras and I carry an E-PL1 with me when I need to go light. I've never been disappointed with the quality from the Oly so long as I recognize its limitations. It isn't a DSLR and never will be, but it produces imagery far better than any of the Point and Shoots I've owned, including the coveted Panasonic LX-5 (Leica DeLux D-5)/
758396
I think the viewfinder on the 2 is better; you get a slightly faster lens speed....1/2000th on the 1 and 1/4000 on the 2. I'm sure there are other differences, but as an owner of the 1, I can tell you that they weren't significant enough for me to buy the 2.
758397
I think I am going to get the EPL-2, but not through amazon. Certain camera shops out here have tax free Memorial Day sales so I will take advantage of them.
758398
Elizabeth, there's no optical viewfinder either in E-PL1 or 2. Both of them are equipped with LCD screen, viewfinder (VF2) is an optional accesory for both models.
1064893
Well to be very honest I don't feel I could compare something I am not familiar with. I would only be reading reviews about the Finepix S1800 and not actually comparing 2 products. I can only say (since I bought it for my son who is 36) that the pictures he takes with it are amazing and the price was very reasonable. I am sorry but I think if I tried to compare it to something I am not familiar with I would be giving you false information.
456321
The D300 was my first SLR Camera. Before that I was using point and shoots. I would say it is appropriate for a beginner who is learning actively. When I bought this cam I had started taking courses and I evolved rapidly to a serious hobbyist. I would say you shouldn't buy it if you're not planning to learn how to be a better photographer, otherwise, the Canon 40D which is also a medium sized SLR would be much more suited. It has many kinds of automatic modes that you would select. The D300 has only four modes: Manual, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority and Program mode. Personally I'm glad I ended up choosing the Nikon D300, it's such an amazing camera... I hope this was helpful
1699314
So I was also looking between the two and just decided to go with the Canon. Also being an amateur I figured that with the Canon brand there would be no chances that there would be glitches or issues using it with my canon camera, there is no doubt of the quality, and if I do progress in photography there is no question about being able to use it as a slave
609714
I own a Rebel T1i. I'd say E-PL2 is good on its own and definitely not a step down. I'm taking only the EPL2 with me these days, and I couldn't be happier by travelling light.I recommend the Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 lens for use with E-PL2. The 20mm focal length is equal to 25mm on a Rebel. It's a cool walkaround lens that will give you superb shallow depth of field at f/1.7.
2024050
I have both. Very little difference. Both are excellent for a point and shoot!
423143
I don't really know----I found some great camera review websites when I was deciding which SLR to choose. My favorite showed basically the same shot taken with multiple cameras. I had narrowed my choice down to 2 based on price and MPs (if I'm gonna do it, I might as well go with the 15.1) and I was delighted to find that I actually liked the pix taken with the less expensive one better. Bet you could find a similar site for p&s;, or start a discussion specifically about the best p&s; for motion shots. My Elph has a setting to take multiple shots, and I've gotten some great butterfly and bird photos---and a lot of lousy ones, too. Ya gotta LOVE digital!!! I don't really know----I found some great camera review websites when I was deciding which SLR to choose. My favorite showed basically the same shot taken with multiple cameras. I had narrowed my choice down to 2 based on price and MPs (if I'm gonna do it, I might as well go with the 15.1) and I was delighted to find that I actually liked the pix taken with the less expensive one better. Bet you could find a similar site for p&s;, or start a discussion specifically about the best p&s; for motion shots. My Elph has a setting to take multiple shots, and I've gotten some great butterfly and bird... » Read More I don't really know----I found some great camera review websites when I was deciding which SLR to choose. My favorite showed basically the same shot taken with multiple cameras. I had narrowed my choice down to 2 based on price and MPs (if I'm gonna do it, I might as well go with the 15.1) and I was delighted to find that I actually liked the pix taken with the less expensive one better. Bet you could find a similar site for p&s;, or start a discussion specifically about the best p&s; for motion shots. My Elph has a setting to take multiple shots, and I've gotten some great butterfly and bird photos---and a lot of lousy ones, too. Ya gotta LOVE digital!!! « Show Less
1089792
Technically it has incredible Image Quality, so not just a good 1st, it's a keeper. It is more a question of preferences: If you like menus to control your camera, there are many others you could look at, however if you prefer dedicated dials like on film cameras for shutter speed, aperture and focus, it is Leica or Fuji X... I started with a Nikon F2, it went with me to every corner of the world. When digital came about I couldn't warm up to menus, did have a G10 that was quite good, but now with the X-E2 I am truly enjoying photography again. Keep in mind, it is not about the technology, it is about what you do with it, which also means once you find a camera you really like you can stay with it for a very long time, it should become an extension of your eyesight...
128547
owning both of them i can tell you that the difference between both is HUGE, if you are a pro and really make your living out of photography i say go for it- the controls are a bit different since now you have a wheel to move thru the menus but you will love it once you get used to, it comes with its own stofen-like diffuser and color gel holder since the latest nikon cameras can detect the color of the gel used and then modify the white balance
425390
Depends on what you need it for. The EF version is just as good for all intents and purposes...the extra $400 is for the Image Stabilization. Do you need IS? The main reason for IS is if you also plan on using it as a medium telephoto prime lens (such as for portraits). If so, then yes! I did, and I'm very happy. But if all I needed it for was to take photos of small inanimate objects while using a tripod, then I would have gone with the EF version and saved the $400!
154001
Thank you. I bought the 2sx230 on 11/11/11 and I noticed outside in the bright sun light it captures movement well well and pretty sharp. Inside not so well. I want very much to learn how to use the ISO and how to make great photos using the manual functions. I bought the canon for its size, I will be traveling which is why I wanted a small camera. The shutter speed seemed to be the fastest. Thanks again these comments are very helpful, I'm really looking forward to getting to know my new camera.
1879011
Hi, Alyssa; Since I'm new to buying an expensive camera, I found that the price and camera was a reasonable for a beginner. Eventually, I will upgrade once I get more into photography. As for the accessories, you are just getting the things you need to start with. Now, if you decide to break it down, one by one, every accessory is expensive on it's own. In the long run, I would say you are getting a great deal for the price. It's just the basic and nothing fancy. Think of it this way; you buy the camera on it's own, you like it a lot. So, you decide to get accessories for it. Eventually, the price for the accessories add up and you spend more than you would have, if you have gotten the Bundle. I say, it's a save if you get the Bundle, than on it's own. I hope that I have answered your question.
1299083
If you have 2 choices, then you must go and try both cameras and try to choose by what you feel. I have the Canon, its my 3rd G series (had the 9 and 11, among 6 or 7 other cameras) and overall its an amazing camera, really. Very VERY quick, with is something that can really make a differnece when hunting for that special pic. Nothing to envy in luminosity to the best reflex out there, it takes pictures with low light that are incredible for the size and price of this machine. And my favourite! the slow motion video recorder, great adition and lots of fun there. The wifi? never used it, yet!
462533
This is a great camera for beginners, but be prepared to spend more on glass/lens as this is the most important part of any camera, all SLR entry level cameras are very close in quality and options as it all really depends on the quality of your lenses. To really learn the camera, do not use the auto modes, learn to use the aperture, manual and shutter modes to take complete control of your photos. There are thousands of youtube videos out there that will teach you all about this camera and how to use the different modes and features. As for this camera model, it is a great camera, i love it, takes amazing photos (with a good lens) and is very easy to operate. This is a great camera for beginners, but be prepared to spend more on glass/lens as this is the most important part of any camera, all SLR entry level cameras are very close in quality and options as it all really depends on the quality of your lenses. To really learn the camera, do not use the auto modes, learn to use the aperture, manual and shutter modes to take complete control of your photos. There are thousands of youtube videos out there that will teach you all about this camera and how to use the different modes and features. As for this camera model, it is a great camera, i love... » Read More This is a great camera for beginners, but be prepared to spend more on glass/lens as this is the most important part of any camera, all SLR entry level cameras are very close in quality and options as it all really depends on the quality of your lenses. To really learn the camera, do not use the auto modes, learn to use the aperture, manual and shutter modes to take complete control of your photos. There are thousands of youtube videos out there that will teach you all about this camera and how to use the different modes and features. As for this camera model, it is a great camera, i love it, takes amazing photos (with a good lens) and is very easy to operate. « Show Less
1025542
I think so, I've had many point-and-shoot camera (mostly Nikon) and this behaves the same as other Nikons. The two lens provide an intro to beginners what different lenses can do. I've spoken with many camera enthusiasts and the second lens is considered inferior to them. In contrary to the other answers, I feel the beginner mode can shoot much better than similar point-and-shoot cameras.
900440
Hi, I recently bought a Nikon S9100 and it brought a small paper starting guide, but the real manual came as a PDF 200-page document in a CD, so I printed it both sides at home and now I have a very complete and well designed manual which I'm reading slowly chapter by chapter in order to take most advantage of this camera. I owned a Sony Cybershot P-73 for 7 years and now I have a lot of new functions to learn (face detection, focus moving subjects, 18X optical zoom, stabilizing image, and so on). Regarding the functions, this camera is in the midway between a small P&S; cameras and it's worth to carefully read the manual and practice, practice and practice a lot!! Hi, I recently bought a Nikon S9100 and it brought a small paper starting guide, but the real manual came as a PDF 200-page document in a CD, so I printed it both sides at home and now I have a very complete and well designed manual which I'm reading slowly chapter by chapter in order to take most advantage of this camera. I owned a Sony Cybershot P-73 for 7 years and now I have a lot of new functions to learn (face detection, focus moving subjects, 18X optical zoom, stabilizing image, and so on). Regarding the functions, this camera is in the midway between a small P&S; cameras and it's... » Read More Hi, I recently bought a Nikon S9100 and it brought a small paper starting guide, but the real manual came as a PDF 200-page document in a CD, so I printed it both sides at home and now I have a very complete and well designed manual which I'm reading slowly chapter by chapter in order to take most advantage of this camera. I owned a Sony Cybershot P-73 for 7 years and now I have a lot of new functions to learn (face detection, focus moving subjects, 18X optical zoom, stabilizing image, and so on). Regarding the functions, this camera is in the midway between a small P&S; cameras and it's worth to carefully read the manual and practice, practice and practice a lot!! « Show Less
1630105
So, I'm looking to upgrade from the Canon EF-S 55-250 ISII lens that I currently shoot my daughter's soccer and outdoor nature scenes. I know this is an entry level L, still the price is hard to complain about. How much of a difference from my current lens (on a 70D) will this make, and will I still be able to shoot fairly clean/crisp images @ 200mm without IS? I can use a monopod, so I'm sure that would help. Thoughts?