Is CX200 or CX150 better?
742559
CX200 is better because is capable with low frequency waves. It means better bass experience.
2279768
I have been doing tons of research online regarding both. The SX20 has excellent reviews about its photo quality compared to the Sony HX1. The benefit to the Sony is that it has 1080p compared to 720p on the Canon. If you want 1080p on a Canon, it will cost an extra $200 for the Canon SX1 is. I personally prefer the Lumix (Panasonic) cameras over both. They use Leica lens which is considered the Rolls Royce of camera lenses. I have used Lumix cameras over the years. I suggest you check out the DMC-FZ35. This camera is highly rated by experts and owners. Each of these cameras has pros and cons against each other however it will all depend on what features you are looking for. If you are looking for camera with loads of manual features, great photo quality and good build, go Canon. If you want easier to use with excellent photo quality, go with the Lumix. The one thing that Canon could improve on is their menu. Many owners had made comments that the menu interface on Canon's is not user friendly. Lumix and Sony have easier to navigate menu's.
309948
ISO 1600 comparison between SX110 and SX120:http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/shared/picture.asp?f=28170http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/shared/picture.asp?f=21018
1521336
I have both, they are both fine tools. G1X II is a high-end compact camera with full controls and add-on options for high image quality. If you only need to publish your photos on the web or share them on Facebook, iPhone, or many other smart phones, will be good enough, I can't see why you will need a G1X II in that case.
1294307
Real life usage shows 250-270W power draw which is 2-2.25A. Better than 3.4A really but still not as good as 2.1A for CX2500 model. Measured with TED5000.
844345
I wouldn't say the SX200 has better build quality than the Panasonic. I have a TZ5 and when comparing it to the SX200, the TZ5 wins hands down with build quality. If the ZS3 maintains this quality, it wipes the floor with the SX200.
1373455
I own both the GX7 and the XE-2. While the GX7 is a nice camera the XE-2 blows it away. The kit lens on the XE-2 is much nicer in it's construction. It feels more substantial and to be of nicer quality materials. The GX7 takes nice pictures but you do get a lot of noise in the images that are taken in lower light conditions. I attribute this to the smaller sensor size. I've been really impressed with the overall image and build quality of the XE-2. So much so that I will often leave my larger Canon and Nikon bodies at home and grab the XE-2 if I'm heading out for the day with the family. Both cameras are really nice but the XE-2 is in my opinion the better camera.
829841
well i do not own an sx20 but what i know is that the sx series of the compact cameras is that the external design is the same. what differentiate the most is the internal.
471709
I liked all the features the camera had to offer, but when viewed on my 17 laptop screen the images were a bit fuzzy, and that is before any enlargement to them. I am going to look at buying the SX280 camera. Size wise, I find my current A2000is very convenient for everyday carry around as would also be the case for the SX160.
262287
Without a doubt the Panasonic is a better deal and camera for the money ,I have both the G12 and the LX5 and the Panasonic wins hands down in almost all aspects. Just My op of course.
1563170
Ok. I ended up trying both Canon SX200 and Panasonic ZS1. I didn't get the ZS3 because the price is much more for functions that aren't important to me. I decided that I am still better off with a point and shoot so I returned SX200 and kept ZS1. Although some of the shots came out great from the SX200 after doing some manual adjusting, I can't afford to take that much time for every shot on my trips. The auto function of Canon is very poor and that makes it rather inconvenient. ZS1 quality is similar but easier to use when there isn't enough time to take pictures. I like it so far.
1624330
I have both and I wouldn't change the D600 for the X-T1 for serious, payed or critical work. Although it's my opinion for the photography I do... maybe for you is different. I would suggest renting one for a week or so, try it extensively and come to a decision. Cheers.
2284472
I'm running the same research and here's the comparison, WX1: in addition to the HD video, its 24mm wide angle is precious in daily shootings (indoors, group pics, ...). It also has 5x zoom. And the CMOS sensor is supposed to be a notch better than CCD. The build quality is good and it's smaller than S90 except the thickness. It's also $100+ cheaper than S90. Battery life is rated at 350 shots v. S90's 220. S90: Manual everything; RAW; F2@28mm; SDHC card; external flash. The DSLR advantages have been the interchangeability for lens and flash. S90 takes another bite on those claims while providing the convenience and accessibility. If you're going up from Point&Shoot, WX1 is the winner; If you're going down from DSLR after the form factor, you'll miss less features with S90. Either is a great camera that will take wonderful pictures in the right hands.
489802
I think the SX40 may be better than SX30 but there is no RAW output. Maybe time for a T3i!
2051967
The big difference is that the AX100 is 4K and has 4 times greater resolution than the CX900s (3840 x 2160 vs. 1920x1080). Even if you don't have a 4K set, the down sampled 4k video is reported to be substantially better quality.
640381
I have both and I notice a big difference in both transfer speed as well as loading speeds. Get the 1000x
928347
Any comments on the SteadyShot® image stabilization w/ Active mode as compared to the Optical SteadyShot™ image stabilization w/ Active mode (Wide to Tele) as found on the HDR-CX300? I am concerned that the stabilization on the CX150 will not be adequate...any comments?