What size should I go with if I wear 36 waist and 30/32 lenght slacks?
741852
I bought size Medium, 30 inch inseam. I have 34 inch waist and 32 inch inseam. The legs on these still have a couple inches of extra length that just bunches up, and I have enough room in the waist. I would suggest that you buy the same size, Medium.
303275
My waist is 35 inches and I bought a Large which fits very comfortably loose (which I prefer in workout and running clothes). Since there is a drawstring, you can probably go with Medium or Large depending on how tight or loose you prefer workout/running clothes.
116614
I would go for the medium. I am a 35" hip and a 27" waist and I took the small, they were quite comfortable.
534994
A medium size would be best for the 33 inch waist. As the medium size fits up to a 34 1/2 inch waist. The range in waist size on a medium is between 30 and 34 1/2 inch. I bought a medium for my son and he has a 32 inch waist and his fit fine.
200356
I wear a 38 in jeans and ordered these in 38 and have a similar fit. It also has a little bit of elastic in the waist band if extra room is needed.
643543
I would go for large. I wear 30 pants, and on the medium size belt, I need to buckle to the hole before the last. So I guess with 36 pants, you would either buckle to the first few holes on a medium belt, or the last few on a large belt. To be safe, I would go for large.
192418
I wear a 36" waist and I bought an extra large. Note that the waist does have elastic AND a Velcro belt. All sizes should fit a wide range.
999270
Hmm. Well, I am currently a little bit smaller than a 33 inch waist and I have a pair of these knickers in a medium. I would say I am comfortable in a 32 but could pull off a 31, and with my medium knickers I have been thinking of getting a pair in a small because I have the adjustable waistband pulled as tight as it can be with the medium size. I would say try them out in a medium but you may be comfortable in a small.
91747
pants have good snug waist line. will fit smaller than 32" waist. I'd go with the medium for the length and pretty sure you'll be satisfied with waistline snugness. good luck. Jim
829132
I have a 33-34 waist and the medium is pretty snug. Large would be advised for 36 waist.
67383
I wear a 34" waist pant, and the medium fits me perfectly. I have no experience with the small, but I would guess that to be the right size for a 28" waist. FYI, I need a large in the matching top, the medium is too tight.
391760
I am probably closer to 35" waist and the Medium fits well - you should have some wiggle room
421274
My husband wears a 33 waist and 34 length and the sweat pants fit him perfect.
36368
I am about a 34-35" waist and a large was huge. Wish I would have gotten a medium. Hopefully that helps you..
303272
I say, if you want tight fit, go with small. A bit of room, then medium. *I wear waist 30-1 in jeans and got a small. It fits good. Hope that helps.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
1463196
I usually wear 33x32 pants and Large is perfect. Not tight around the waist, and legs are 1/16" above the ground. They do have an adjustable drawstring, so sizes should be somewhat flexible!