Is this the original formula or is it the one that say original-mint?
766583
I received the original formula when I ordered this. No other flavors were in the formula.
766584
I researched the ingredients which are as follows: Mineral Oil, Petrolatum, Paraffin, Hydrogenated Coconut Oil, Ceresin, Beeswax, Flavor, Certified Organic: Butyrospurmum Parkii (Shea Butter) Fruit, Tocopheryl Acetate (Vitamin E Acetate), Retinyl Palmitate (Vitamin A Palmitate), Bixa Orellana Seed Extract. If you want to have fun, look up the ingredients. In short version the products are preservative coatings and seals. Some ingredients are used to hold the product together and some are used for vitamins A, E, and possible B. The flavor may be the mint you were inquiring about called Bixa Orellana Seed Extract used for taste and smell, (No ingrediants say mint). When I ordered Lypsyl I went for the original. All I know is it's the best working for dry lips for winter, summer, or fall.
62478
Daniel, its original. I bought two of thesse at amazon in december and its the same as I bought at other stores before. Maybe GNC changed its package lately.
619044
Since I do not have a sample of the 70th formula it is difficult to tell if it is identical since it cannot be compared. The only thing I can say is that it is most like the original version.
1391531
From the research I have done, it is not in this formula. I have used this brand for several years and am quite happy with it.
1834460
I just squeeze the tube a bit and lick it off the top, then roll it around in my mouth with my tongue til it coats everywhere. Worked much betterwith the original formula as it was thicker. It's a clear gel. After getting it around in your mouth then the mouth is moist again. I often wake up in pain from the dryness and if I didn't have it I'd never get back to sleep. Thanks for asking. Someplace i found a gel with a mint flavor but I can't use mint so I don't remember what the name of it was.
942896
I believe it is the original just had a change in packaging. I have ordered this twice since my dermatologist has discontinued selling the product. This first experience was great. However, the last time I ordered from a different vendor and had to return it due to poor packaging (it was not sealed or wrapped). I returned the item and have not ordered since then. I used this product for a few years and liked it very much. However, I have since been hesitant to reorder.
484067
No, these are one of the new formulas BUT these were made in India, supposedly a better than the current UK formula. I don't believe the original formula is available anywhere.
276469
The original was not suppose to. However; I was told by the makers of fake bake last year that they were changing their formula. You can call them and they will tell you the ingrediance
1523929
I only own Mint Plus, so here is the better explanation. http://mintcleaner.blogspot.com/2012/03/mint-cleaner-and-mint-plus-first-mint.html
1121240
It isn't really minty. I used it for my dog in renal failure. It was a good product for that.
820590
I'm not sure what the "improved" PH is, but it says original mint flavor, and seems to be the Biotene I first used several years ago. It isn't a gel, it's the original white toothpaste. Besides the flavor and gentleness, I prefer it because it doesn't have coloring added (like the blue gel formula does).
450417
I think that, certain vendors, here on Amazon may be selling a false product, I wish I knew which one I'd gotten it from but it smelled strong of mint, like an artificial product, I have MCS and I didn't react to it when it was selling w/ 'Master's Miracle' before it change, but this I did. I'm hoping it was the case that the vendor was bad, so I can get the true one from another vendor, I really do like the true product and have even gotten their Moisturizing one and am quite happy w/ it (though I have to dilute it a LOT). So, I think it's taking a chance, but Amazon credited me and if I get the wrong one this time, I will report the vendor and hope they address it. I think that, certain vendors, here on Amazon may be selling a false product, I wish I knew which one I'd gotten it from but it smelled strong of mint, like an artificial product, I have MCS and I didn't react to it when it was selling w/ 'Master's Miracle' before it change, but this I did. I'm hoping it was the case that the vendor was bad, so I can get the true one from another vendor, I really do like the true product and have even gotten their Moisturizing one and am quite happy w/ it (though I have to dilute it a LOT). So, I think it's taking a chance, but Amazon credited me and if I... » Read More I think that, certain vendors, here on Amazon may be selling a false product, I wish I knew which one I'd gotten it from but it smelled strong of mint, like an artificial product, I have MCS and I didn't react to it when it was selling w/ 'Master's Miracle' before it change, but this I did. I'm hoping it was the case that the vendor was bad, so I can get the true one from another vendor, I really do like the true product and have even gotten their Moisturizing one and am quite happy w/ it (though I have to dilute it a LOT). So, I think it's taking a chance, but Amazon credited me and if I get the wrong one this time, I will report the vendor and hope they address it. « Show Less
656985
Kimberly, I have been using this product for quite some time now, and I cannot tell any change in the formula from the first time I ever used the it. I still love it, and my hair feel clean at the end of the day. So, yes, it seems to be the original. No other company has anything close that I can find. Hope this helps. Jeff
619043
No, It's not. I actually have a bottle of the real original 1997 copyright clairol stuff that I bought from Drugstoredotcom when they were liquidating the old stock back in 2008 (bought 7 bottles). The real stuff does NOT have glycerine in it. The correct ingredients are water, alcohol, camphor, peppermint oil, clove oil, eugenol, sodium benzoate, yellow 5, orange 4. I was fooled by the bottle here since the design is like the '70s bottle and not like the ones I have in hand but the ingredients are wrong. I think the glycerine is what makes the newer versions sticky, which I can't stand. Sure wish I'd bought more! :( No, It's not. I actually have a bottle of the real original 1997 copyright clairol stuff that I bought from Drugstoredotcom when they were liquidating the old stock back in 2008 (bought 7 bottles). The real stuff does NOT have glycerine in it. The correct ingredients are water, alcohol, camphor, peppermint oil, clove oil, eugenol, sodium benzoate, yellow 5, orange 4. I was fooled by the bottle here since the design is like the '70s bottle and not like the ones I have in hand but the ingredients are wrong. I think the glycerine is what makes the newer versions sticky, which I can't stand.... » Read More No, It's not. I actually have a bottle of the real original 1997 copyright clairol stuff that I bought from Drugstoredotcom when they were liquidating the old stock back in 2008 (bought 7 bottles). The real stuff does NOT have glycerine in it. The correct ingredients are water, alcohol, camphor, peppermint oil, clove oil, eugenol, sodium benzoate, yellow 5, orange 4. I was fooled by the bottle here since the design is like the '70s bottle and not like the ones I have in hand but the ingredients are wrong. I think the glycerine is what makes the newer versions sticky, which I can't stand. Sure wish I'd bought more! :( « Show Less
2180281
Yes. It is def the original. And yes, it pretty much lasts until I shower. Don't spray on your clothes.
136905
Sorry, I have no idea. I have the gold label also, and the ingredients are the same.
339654
Hi! I asked myself the same question when I bought it. But is very good, and to me it is original. The bottle its the same and the product smell the same too. I use it everyday and my skin look radiant. I have been using Estee Lauder for years and im very happy with this.