How is this different from the Calphalon Tri-Ply Stainless Steel 14" Roaster with Nonstick Rack &amp; Stainless Steel Lifters, besides having the lifters?
780542
Sorry I really don't know, as I don't own the other roaster. I absolutely love my Calphalon Contemporary Roaster. It is the nicest roaster I've ever owned. Cooks great, cleans up real easy, just love this roaster.
1496050
Sandy, It looks like answers for more than one size roaster are all showing up in one general Q&A; for Granite Ware. I have the 13-inch roaster which refers to the length including the handles, not the interior length. I can roast a smaller chicken in it and I use the Harold 11 3/4 x 8 1/2 oval rack BUT I had to bend it down the middle with pliers because it was slightly too wide to fit (I think the width of mine is 8 inches.) It was hard to bend and is not perfectly symmetrical but I like the slight V that formed in the rack. The bottom of the roaster has indentations to prevent a bird from sealing to the bottom if you want to cook without a rack, which I have also done. Hope this helps a little. Sandy, It looks like answers for more than one size roaster are all showing up in one general Q&A; for Granite Ware. I have the 13-inch roaster which refers to the length including the handles, not the interior length. I can roast a smaller chicken in it and I use the Harold 11 3/4 x 8 1/2 oval rack BUT I had to bend it down the middle with pliers because it was slightly too wide to fit (I think the width of mine is 8 inches.) It was hard to bend and is not perfectly symmetrical but I like the slight V that formed in the rack. The bottom of the roaster has indentations to prevent a bird from... » Read More Sandy, It looks like answers for more than one size roaster are all showing up in one general Q&A; for Granite Ware. I have the 13-inch roaster which refers to the length including the handles, not the interior length. I can roast a smaller chicken in it and I use the Harold 11 3/4 x 8 1/2 oval rack BUT I had to bend it down the middle with pliers because it was slightly too wide to fit (I think the width of mine is 8 inches.) It was hard to bend and is not perfectly symmetrical but I like the slight V that formed in the rack. The bottom of the roaster has indentations to prevent a bird from sealing to the bottom if you want to cook without a rack, which I have also done. Hope this helps a little. « Show Less
1205569
Yes. I do it all the time, and it is one of the clear advantages of having the aluminum sandwiched in between the stainless steel. So, you can brown your vegetables, or heat up the liquid, or make a sauce in the roaster and then plop it into the oven.
978012
This rack will not scratch your stainless steel roaster. It is heavily coated in plastic. I use it in my all clad roaster.
2215334
My Calphalon Contemporary Stainless Steel pots work flawlessly on my induction cooktop. I don't have the roaster pan pictured so I don't know if it will work for sure but I'm guessing it will because all the items in that line are made the same way.
696028
length, 14-1/8" top & curves in to 12-1/2" at bottom. width 10" at top & 7-7/8" at bottom. inside depth is 1-15/16" from bottom to top od rim. Outside dimensions 17" from outside edge of handles & 10-5/8 wide both measurement's taken at top of roaster. This is a very well built piece, strong and tack welded at all joints. My unit has a slightly different configuration at the bottom; instead of the 3 cross bars represented in your picture here mine has a repeated design of the top & lower shape approximately 1-3/4" in from the base of where the bottom of the handles are welded & from the 45 degree angles at each corner, that is a continuing piece of metal making a "X" at the bottom. Hope this helps. length, 14-1/8" top & curves in to 12-1/2" at bottom. width 10" at top & 7-7/8" at bottom. inside depth is 1-15/16" from bottom to top od rim. Outside dimensions 17" from outside edge of handles & 10-5/8 wide both measurement's taken at top of roaster. This is a very well built piece, strong and tack welded at all joints. My unit has a slightly different configuration at the bottom; instead of the 3 cross bars represented in your picture here mine has a repeated design of the top & lower shape approximately 1-3/4" in from the base of where the bottom of... » Read More length, 14-1/8" top & curves in to 12-1/2" at bottom. width 10" at top & 7-7/8" at bottom. inside depth is 1-15/16" from bottom to top od rim. Outside dimensions 17" from outside edge of handles & 10-5/8 wide both measurement's taken at top of roaster. This is a very well built piece, strong and tack welded at all joints. My unit has a slightly different configuration at the bottom; instead of the 3 cross bars represented in your picture here mine has a repeated design of the top & lower shape approximately 1-3/4" in from the base of where the bottom of the handles are welded & from the 45 degree angles at each corner, that is a continuing piece of metal making a "X" at the bottom. Hope this helps. « Show Less
1227769
So, the LCS3 (which is currently priced at 22 and some change) is only a 10 inch diameter and has sloped sides measuring only at 1 3/4 in (might be 1 1/4 in I'm going off memory). The LK8S3 is 10.25 diameter and the sides are not sloped they are straight and measure 2 inches high. I just used the LK8S3 this morning for a fritata with eggs, red bell peppers, baby bellas, chopped kale, and sharp cheddar on top. I have a five person family and it is big enough to produce a yummy fritata that will feed us all. I start the meal on the stove top and finish in the oven. I like the high/straight sides of this dish because you could even bake a cake in it or a pot pie etc. I have a pan comparable to the LCS3 but it is smaller in diameter (I think an 8 or 9 in). Pans with a sloped side are great for sauting and performing cooking tasks that require moving the pan around to flip the food about. The LK8S3 is quite heavy so I could only assume the LCS3 "chef's" series skillet might be more pricey because it might be lighter weight for performing tasks that require flicking of the wrists and flipping without compromising the length of the diameter and the quality of the cast iron. Don't quote me on that, the last part is only an assumption. If you want an exact explanation I'm sure someone at Lodge would be happy to assist you. They probably have a contact link on their website. Hopefully I helped, I tried my best. Have a lovely day!
978011
I bought it for my All-Clad stainless steel roaster; it's identical to the rack that originally came with the roasting pan. So yes, you can use it on stainless steel.
192911
Hello Constance ~ No this roaster does not have the ridges typical of most Circulon products. Utilizing the included rack eliminates the need for the ridges. Thank you for your inquiry Constance.
212341
I also have the 5.5 quart stand mixer. it works well and has all attachments for making ground meat and sausages. it is well built, all metal, except feed tray and pusher. Pusher doubles as storage for all the small parts.
1740984
I can get 2- 7 pound chickens or up to a 18 lb turkey in the roaster when the birds are sitting on the rack. Its the best roaster we have ever owned,great for cooking everything.Makes great pot roast with potatoes and carrots also.
1690481
I have not used the triple-ply but the Simply Calphalon I got for my daughter is great! It has the aluminum core which I like because it heats more evenly. She absolutely loves this set.
389543
Stainless steel only. Since it is designed for roasting (rather than cooling), non-stick will have a tendency to peel due to over-heating.
815955
I have two - one older (20 yrs) and this newer one you are asking about. Both are Kaiser. Both seem to be the same thickness and cook about the same. I do have to watch the newer one to make sure it doesn't get the crust too dark as it is just a little darker in color. You say your Calphalon is heavier, so you might want to watch the cook time in case it needs adjusting. Also, be careful you haven't bought Kaiser's cheaper version, which looks identical except of the lock; that one is noticeably thinner and isn't worth having. Good luck.
1039184
I have not broiled with this roaster. You should check with the manufacturer on that subject. I've not used a baking heat over 375, but it should take a bit higher heat. Once again, check w/the manufacturer. Also, it KEEPS its BEAUTIFUL appearance . I've had it for almost 2 years. I hope I have helped you. It is perfect for a large turkey, and I have even cooked in the top and the bottom of this roaster.
1657906
Calphalon is not as heavy as cast iron pots but just as durable. Nonstick quality is the same besides outrageous price of cast iron dutch oven pots. Good luck!!
1678293
The roasting pan is enamel-coated stainless steel, and yet it is not very heavy. I usually cook smaller meals, so I put them into a smaller pan inside the roasting pan. Or else I use the rack that fits on top and has small pans that fit into it.