How sharp is the image on this camera?
777490
It is a 2 megapixel sensor giving you a 1920x1080 video resolution. It does not seem to have the same still image quality as a 2 megapixel point and shoot camera. However, I'm happy with the sharpness. Better than a 1.3Mp webcam. Much better than any analog video. One thing worth noting. The camera lens comes pre-focused for a large room. Need to focus lens for outdoor use.
777491
Image quality is great on this camera. If you put the model into YouTube you can see feeds from people that are using it I did return mine however. I needed infrared for night time. If you only need a camera without IR, great choice for the cost
777492
Image quality is great on this camera. If you put the model into YouTube you can see feeds from people that are using itI did return mine however. I needed infrared for night time. If you only need a camera without IR, great choice for the cost
777493
It's full HD so it' very sharp. This is the primary feature for a camera of this price.
777494
The image is pretty good. I don't notice any bluriness, the only spot it loses detail is the very brightest part, because I adjusted the image settings to show more shadow detail. Zoomed in, sharp lines are just 2-3 pixels wide. Small details in the wall texture or tree trunks show just fine. At night it shows a good image under street lights, but note that it is not infrared or "night vision."
1869621
I have the same problem with this camera. Focus is soft and there are noticeable chromatic aberrations (aura you're talking about), there's also noticeable barrel effect (people look wider off-center). Honestly, optics is pretty bad on this camera. The focusing system also seems to be hit and miss but mostly miss. I set mine in manual mode with center focusing and even then the image is far from what I'm used to call "in focus". I'm surprised this camera is rated this high. My older Canon S410 takes consistently better images.
272082
The picture quality wasn't good without zoom, it only gets worse with it. I would guess about 5x but it was blurry, not crisp at all.
2150785
The image stays relatively clear up to 5 or 6 inches. At 4, I could still easily identify the image but was a bit fuzzy, definitely could not make out the fine details. Also, lighting was so what of a issue at 2 to 3 inches. It has to shine in at about a 45 angle from behind the camera to illuminate the image enough. At 3.7mm lenses, it definitely designed for a wide angle view of a room or hall. I would look at something with a macro lens if you want closeups.
282889
The quality is very good. the camera is able to adjust quite well and the image is very detailed.
606482
My shots are mostly very sharp, however, occasionally, this lens will just produce a clunker. However, I'm not sure its any worse than with some of the "L" series lenses that I've used, so I put it down to technology failure. I normally would attribute it to me, but there are times when I take a picture in noon daylight, standing still and its out of focus. That's almost impossible if you think about it.
1792965
The quality of the camera itself will produce a clear images. But it depends on the lens that you get for close-up shots. I've got an amazingly sharp photos using a macro lens :)
2236586
Sacha, its got a decent zoom for such a tiny camera, but at full zoom ranges the images can get grainy. However for medium zoom, regular and macro, the image quality is really great. I like it as a point and shoot.
2149805
Yes, I'd recommend 400 DPI, its a bit slower but the picture comes out a lot better
1585599
It's 720p hd that makes it about 1 mega pixel. The USB is attached to the camera and is about 3 feet long. I use mine all the time and all of my clients have said the picture is fine.
1576340
Yes the picture quality is quite acceptable. It works the other way too - a Sony still picture camera with a high resolution image capture takes surprisingly great HD video!
1653886
I don't use the camera often though it does take decent pictures for a device like this. The picture were not blurry unless I had a shaky hand but they did pixelate when I zoomed and wanted to use the image on my computer.
1519724
I didn't really examine that.....the sharpness of the lens I got direct from Canon was so bad that after taking a couple dozen shots and examining them closely I sent it back for a refund. I replaced it with a 12-24 Sigma which appears to be much superior in every respect...at about 40% of the price
1175501
CCD, the 1080P by Sharp is fantastic. I went with the highest resolution possible and I am NOT dissatisfied. The picture is phenomenal with an HD signal. My wife and I watch this TV in our bedroom more now than the 38" tube HDTV in the livingroom. Go with the Sharp. I do not think you'll be disappointed.
1675351
It's iso is 125 so they wouldn't be as sharp as a camera with an iso of 80. But other than that it takes great maco's.
1190459
I bought it because it has a lot less distortion as it zooms. I do have to say it is a sharp lens though.
1199805
The camera is good. I've used it for instagram and posting to fb. Sometimes it looks grainy but need to make sure the settings are on the highest resolution/pixels possible.