which is better to use a high end receiver or use a preamplifier and amplifier
767055
Until I got the CX-A500BL I was of the thought that separate components where better. Having a processor and separate amplifier was my choice. However, The Yamaha CX-A 5000 changed my mind! This unit is awesome.
767056
I agree, the best to use separates if you can afford. I have used both separates and high quality receivers and believe the Yamaha Aventage separates are superior.
767057
If you have the space and $$$, always best to use a preamplifier and amplifier for sound quality.
2167769
Yes it is high gain, yes it is full HD and it don't make a difference if receiver is HD or not.
87411
There are a lot of options, and it depends on what you'll be using them for. I just listen to music most of the time, so I use a Yamaha A-S500 integrated amplifier. It has worked great for me.
1668964
I was going to use a preamp but saw a video for installation. The preamp interfered with the signal. So I am not using a preamp. Watch YouTube brian shaw's, how to install two hdtv antenas. That will give you a better idea.
1723834
I use mine for the subwoofer so it is between the receiver and the sub amp - no problem. If you want to use it on an amplified channel then you will need a receiver that has a processor loop.
1482635
Yes. Plus the signal is so strong I use a preamp. But a preamp isn't necessary, just more convenient.
972697
yes, you are correct. it is awesome preamplifier, it is pretty small and easy to keep wherever u want, individual knobs gives u more n more sounds.
974321
No unless you buy a separate preamp. I don't know any new receivers that do.
1468978
No, you do not need a preamp. There is a dedicated phono input. I took a snapshot of the page from the manual, but can't attach it here. You can download the PDF manual at onkyo's site and look at page En-18. :-)
182417
The receiver, using the supplied microphone, will balance the levels from the various speakers for best listening results. Unless you are operating the unit at very loud levels, most listening environments do not use over about 1-2 watts of output. Your speakers appear to be able to stand very high power levels, so they would not be the issue. Do make sure that the receiver has adequate ventilation, especially if you really like to crank up the sound levels. 8 ohm speakers will work fine with the receiver. Just make sure that the connections are good and that there are no wire strands that could short across between the + output and the - output for each channel. The receiver, using the supplied microphone, will balance the levels from the various speakers for best listening results. Unless you are operating the unit at very loud levels, most listening environments do not use over about 1-2 watts of output. Your speakers appear to be able to stand very high power levels, so they would not be the issue. Do make sure that the receiver has adequate ventilation, especially if you really like to crank up the sound levels. 8 ohm speakers will work fine with the receiver. Just make sure that the connections are good and that there are no wire strands that... » Read More The receiver, using the supplied microphone, will balance the levels from the various speakers for best listening results. Unless you are operating the unit at very loud levels, most listening environments do not use over about 1-2 watts of output. Your speakers appear to be able to stand very high power levels, so they would not be the issue. Do make sure that the receiver has adequate ventilation, especially if you really like to crank up the sound levels. 8 ohm speakers will work fine with the receiver. Just make sure that the connections are good and that there are no wire strands that could short across between the + output and the - output for each channel. « Show Less
1321183
I used the Emotiva a-100 amplifier which is a little over $200 and it sounded great. I'm sure that the 2 channel receivers at Best Buy also should work well but are probably in the $150 and up range. You can also look up Class D amplifiers on the Internet. Some are closer to $100 and anything with 25 watts or more should suffice. Since you are using the computer, the radio on a receiver is not necessary since most stations have websites.
1773400
I just purchased a seperate $30 or $40 pre-amp (if your not worried about having a equalizer on your amp). I do my equalization through my receiver. It really depends how fussy you are about the sound and where it would be easier to make the changes (it's easier usually to adjust the equalization on the receiver).
624622
The high performance antenna does not have a pre-amp although it is somewhat directional. The extreme performance version does have a pre-amp but I have no practical experience with it. My recommendation is to go to www.dtv.gov and check your coverage under consumer resources and coverage maps. I would hesitate to recommend the high performance version for anything with a signal strength of less than -50db.
1727309
you will have to run the preamp into to an aux. input for it to work. The preamp boosts the signal to a level that the receiver can handle.
2167770
yes.your receiver must have HD and the use of a HDMI cable is also a must for the high gain
1851516
The XPA-5 is a 200 watts per channel (all channels driven at the same time) the amp is heavy duty Audiophile quality. However the UPA is only 80 watts ( average use) in my opinion . save your money and buy a good quality AV Receiver like a Onkyo TX-NR838, Denon AVR-X4000 or Yamaha RX-A2030 all below $1000. will deliver Audiophile quality performance. I bought a top of the line Yamaha A3040 FOR $1600 DIRECTLY FROM ONE CALL SHIPPED FREE when I called about a "like new unit for the same price...call them
123534
I'm no expert but you'll probably need a pre-amp if your receiver doesnt have a phono input and or was built in the two decades. If you dont have a pre-amp then your record will be fine but you wont be able to hear it and you may damage your receiver. It would be great if you can find someone to loan you one just to test it.