This Vs. The DLP: Which would you say is better?
748271
As Vena said they are really different techs but here are a few things to notice that may help you decide. First DLP uses a bulb to produce the image, so of course it will need to be replaced at some point. Depending on the average time you leave your tv on for will determine how long it lasts. Normally these bulbs are rated for 5000 hours so if you leave it on for 4 hours a day, you are looking at about every 3 1/2 years to replace it(which is not that bad). I use my tv much more than this because of my 360 and other devices so I average around 7-8 hours a day, meaing I would have to get a new bulb under every 2 years. They are between 200-300 dollars, and you can put them in yourself. It does pay to get a plan that will include replacing bulbs, but the plan does not last forever. The next aspect to consider is the viewing angle. The LCD wins in this case as its viewing angle is 178(H)/178(V) while the DLP is 140(H) x 60(V). This may not be a big deal for some people but may be an issue for others. It really depends where you are going to be watching tv from. The DLP is not able to swivel as this LCD is. In my opinion this makes a difference because it is very easy to change cables or get behind the tv if needed. Specifically for this model, it is does not have PIP while the LCD does. Another thing to consider is the distance you are from the tv. You can be a few extra feet away from a 50 inch tv over a 40 inch one. I tested this by seeing how far from the tv I would sit and then going to the store and seeing the differences between tvs at this distance. I do think that the DLP will produce a better picture in some circumstances because of the 10,000 to 1 contrast ratio and that the image will not look pixelated from any distance. As for your PS3, both tvs have 1080p over hdmi and that is all your really need to get the best performance out of it.
687827
It's not a question of whether DLNA is or is not simplistic. It's a question of whether it works when people use this device, and specifically when people use it with the native capabilities of whatever is hosting or storing the media. Saying what's better sidesteps the issue. It would be better for me to ignore the WD and use a powerful desktop computer attached to my TV instead. Unless you factor in cost. In that case, it's better not to need to find any dedicated server program or anything else that's not included for free.
1181758
Get rid of the BBE. The DBX will make a world of difference. It does what you want the bbe to do, but better.
39794
I believe the clarity is better. I like the quick throw lever and the scope looks better on an ar than the mtac in my opinion. Ironically i bought this scope to replace a burris mtac. As far as the main benefit goes, the ffp reticle, do your own research to determine if its the thing for you. From a tactical perspective ffp is the way to go. Bottom line, I love it, and would def recommend.
1597351
I called Energy support to get opinion on which one is better. In support person's opinion, Take Classic is little better as the speakers are little larger and fill the room (with sound) little better.
1536255
I'd choose the PFC version since it has a has a higher-quality sine wave output that is less likely to cause problems with the connected equipment.
364838
"Better" would be an opinion. If you put or have rounds in strips the strip reloader is faster. If they are not in strips they are about the same speed, this one(speed loader) may be faster. This speed loader is a better unloader tho for sure.
368071
Idk......i can't comment as i only bought dlp link.....but through what i read and researched dlp link was better.......avs forum and other random audio video sites i read
1050542
I'm with Eric. Two standard discs are cheaper than one DL disc, and more reliable. The only reason to use a DL disc is if you have a single chunk of data bigger than 4.7GB that has to go on one disc. In any event, please don't buy this brand -- they're unreliable, in my painful experience.
649089
DVD-R are more compatible with Players & have a little more memory almost 4.7 GB. DVD+DL & DVD-DL are for recording 8.5 GB on Two Layers with Dual Layers DVD+DL & DVD-DL. I use DVD-R for 4.7 GB & DVD+DL for 8.5 GB
782478
Jeanette, this is the best answer I've found.... http://blog.tech-crawl.com/coreldraw-education-edition-vs-commercial/
656207
The difference is the FFP ( first focal plain ) The FFP is more expensive and you can look it up for an explaination
1184251
the difference is the maker CR is basically generic and DL is made and used by Duracell. Hope this helps
9497
Both can be usedAlthough, I installed this partly b/c our cd player is broken and it's too expensive to fix
368070
DLP link is more widespread - many projectors use DLP link. 3DRF is less common. The big advantage is RF does not need a line of sight. DLP link needs either a direct line of sight or bounce off the screen. This is usually not a problem for most people. RF can connect from anywhere in the room. There is absolutely no quality difference in the technology - if one pair of glasses is better than the other, it is strictly the manufacturer of the glasses and has nothing to do with RF or IR (DLP link)
972566
There are several different options that are either the same cost or cheaper. I would go with the other options. I purchased this item based on review of stellar technical support, but I found out too late those reviews to be grossly incorrect.
69158
I don't see any extra content in the download version, but I encourage you to investigate further. Barring that, this one certainly looks like the better value.