which device "FujiFilm FinePix REAL 3D V1 Viewer - 2D/3D 8" LCD Display" or this one "V3" has better resolution and would be better decision to buy?
752727
Buy the V3 without any question. It has 800 x 600 resolution while the V1 has 400 x 300..
752728
I just bought the V3. It does have great resolution. I transferred all of my older 2D pics to a card for it as well as my 3D pics. I have no problems with it at all. Resolution is great. Hope this helps.
752729
V1 Viewer is really really bad, I've got one, it's useless. V3 Viewer is nice (I've got one too), with better resolution, its quality looks like the 3D screen on the back of the camera Fuji W3. It can play 3D photos AND 3D videos ! Don't buy a V1, you will be disappointed. Sorry, my english is very poor (I'm french)
752730
The V3 is the updated version at 800 x 600Better picture higher contrast ECT. The V1 has 400 x 600 resolution and is discontinued .
752731
The V1 has a 3D resolution of 400 x 600 compared to the V3 that has 800 x 600. The specifications can be found on the FujiFilm Web site.
752732
I don't think that there is a difference in resolution, but the contrast is probably much better. But this is knowledge which I retrieved from internet. I am content with my 3d viewer V3.
752733
The v3 is the better one because it will work on any 3d tv. The v3 is also compatible with the finepix v3 camera
452920
I'm certain that both above mentioned cameras produce excellent images. They both have high resolution 3 inch screens, but to say P7000's images are better because they look better on the camera's LCD screen is akin to saying one blonde looks better than the other one from 100 yards out. You can't really make a meaningful comparison until you've uploaded the files to the computer and view them under magnification.
1298945
V1 had a TN screen the V2 has an IPS screen. Better viewing angles. That's the primary difference I believe.
2045684
The Fuji FinePix S6800 has a 3" diagonal LCD Monitor for seeing what the camera sees. That is considered the view finder.
359952
Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3... » Read More Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. « Show Less
513200
Passive 3D is a plus, imo. Besides the lighter/cheaper/no-recharge glasses, the image is brighter. And it appears just as smooth/hi-res as the active 3D because each eye sees a picture 100% of the time and the eye interpolates, whereas shutter glasses have each eye closed half the time. No weird flickering or fatigue with the passive 3D,and (on my 42" Vizio) the 3D really pops and looks pretty nice.
1243595
Also the 4065F has 10 bit conversion compared to the 8 bit processing in the 4061F. I believe this means that up conversion from lower resolution sources is superior...less grainy with better color.
821607
I bought one, never worked in 1080p, 720p. Also had several dead green pixles so I returned it and the second one was worse. Consider another one.
1180854
The word at the 2013 CES show is that Fujifilm does not plan to improve it at this time. They are concentrating on professional stuff. You can improve on its performance by searching the internet for attachable beam splitters that are custom made for this camera. With them you can shoot much better closeups and far shots but they are expensive. You can also search for a $25 view finder which will overcome screen blackout in bright sunlight. There is none made for the W3 but I found one that was very close to the right size and it works if when I shoot I compensate for the fact that it is a bit smaller than the W3's screen. The W3 is not a DSLR by any means but I have used it to successfully take almost 10,000 3D images and many 3D videos of many beautiful things in Jamaica over 2 years and then I created a tourist website full of those 3D images (3d-jamaicadotcom) that has been endorsed by the Jamaica Tourist Board. So I highly recommend this camera in spite of its minor flaws.
1372121
Spend the extra bucks on the t5i. There is a major picture quality and video quality from the t3i and the t5i. And the lcd display is delightful
1204355
According to the Sony website they both have a 3" LCD screen. I can't be sure as I haven't seen both cameras in person together but I can't imagine they opted for a different size screen as they seem to have standardized that screen for a few different models.
1850982
I don't know, the card I put in mi Fujifilm Finepix real 3d is a 8GB SD-HC I (30MB/S).
1298947
Don't even consider getting the V1 (version 1), there were multiple display issues, connection issues, quality issues UI issues etc. All those problems were solved and improved with the V2. The V2 is as good or better than the Cintiq generally speaking.
2083383
Actually, the T3 has the better image quality. Cramming more megapixels onto the same size chip, just gives you a noisier picture, with less dynamic range.More megapixels is mostly just a sales tactic. A 7 MP camera will easily give a clear 10x12 image, so anything beyond that is only useful if you do a lot of cropping. Unless of course, you make poster size prints, in which case, 12 MP is plenty.I could care less about a higher res LCD...The main reason to go for the T3i, is if you are interested (or think you may become interested) in doing video. The T3i does far surpass the T3 in all but just casual video captures. Actually, the T3 has the better image quality. Cramming more megapixels onto the same size chip, just gives you a noisier picture, with less dynamic range.More megapixels is mostly just a sales tactic. A 7 MP camera will easily give a clear 10x12 image, so anything beyond that is only useful if you do a lot of cropping. Unless of course, you make poster size prints, in which case, 12 MP is plenty.I could care less about a higher res LCD...The main reason to go for the T3i, is if you are interested (or think you may become interested) in doing video. The... » Read More Actually, the T3 has the better image quality. Cramming more megapixels onto the same size chip, just gives you a noisier picture, with less dynamic range.More megapixels is mostly just a sales tactic. A 7 MP camera will easily give a clear 10x12 image, so anything beyond that is only useful if you do a lot of cropping. Unless of course, you make poster size prints, in which case, 12 MP is plenty.I could care less about a higher res LCD...The main reason to go for the T3i, is if you are interested (or think you may become interested) in doing video. The T3i does far surpass the T3 in all but just casual video captures. « Show Less
1069512
I think they are both the same, make sure they are both 3d capable, from what i heard the A3R comes with 8 pairs of 3 D glasses, mine is A3 with 4 pair and then there is a 801i-a3 that is without 3D, that is what I think, but you need to verify this with the store......
1134719
Oddly enough, I ended up going with neither of these. I compared these to the Sony CX130. Picked them up in the stores and found the image of the Sony to be more brilliant. The Sony form factor was smaller as well which will be good for traveling. Best part is that it's only $350. It uses SD cards (no internal memory), but that didn't bother me since SD cards are so cheap now.
2017292
It has full HD 1080p the 3 has 720p , it also has a low light sensor. I don't have a Looxie 3 so I can't really compare them side by side.