is st or eq better for the 130
770255
I assume you are asking about the orion scope vs the celestron scope? I've no experience with the orion st, there's a comparison on cloudy nights' user forum. There is a lot of info there. I beive that is where I found a write up on what to expect from various size optics and focal lengths. I'm still happy with the astromaster. It has pretty good optics, but as many people have pointed out, the mount is a little flimsy.
1642033
The 130 and 120 both use a 20 degree angle. The 1520 is both 15 and 20 degree angle.
422950
I have them both. These sound better but don't clamp as hard or fit my head as well. The decreased clamping makes them more comfortable but they leak more sound out and don't isolate as well from outside sounds. I kind of like the 280's for drowning outside noises.
1916343
The styli are interchangeable. They are actually the same. Stanton only sells one styli as a replacement for both of the cartargres. The difference is the E has a 4-coil in it making it better for audio recording and producing. The regular 680 does not but has a better low end response making it better for scratching and club environments. Both are great choices but I do find the E to get a little squrialley and jumpy when scratching.
164260
There is some controversy about the bass on Ety's. Most headphones these days emphasize bass whereas Etymotics are designed to be scrupulously neutral. Bass is there as long as you choose tips that give you a good seal (important with any IEM) but if you are looking for a thumping "bass-freak" headphone (for hip hop for example), the Ety's probably aren't it. Haven't heard the 215 but have a friend who owns a pair. Suspect they are if anything a little 'bassier' than the Ety.
893674
I have used both. Both in Sennheiser Units. I haven't had a problem with either one in the limited time that I've used them. Other than a little bit of gaon adjustment, I can't see the price difference. Especially for the price, the SE 10 works perfectly In most applications.
661372
The sharpening disks for the 130 are different. For the 130: 100% diamond stage in stage 1; super hardened miniature steel in stage 2; and flexible stropping disks in stage 3. The disks are different on the 120. The grit is diamond for stages 1 and 2, and a "patented" material for disk 3. It's great for thin kitchen knives. I have the 120.
1192319
I can't compare the two, but reviews I read indicated specs for the 140 were better at the edges. I bought the 140 several months ago, and am very pleased with quality and speed.
478611
Learn how to use a eq. I bought this for a club install. Great if you like bad sound it cut out all the frequencies you don't want to lose.
1822094
The 550 is 30000:1, The 650 is 50000:1 There is a big difference in PQ of these two sets.The 650 being better.
822720
The T20's honestly sound great. I did plenty of research before buying, while the T40's are better, I don't believe the difference makes up for the extra price.
1428220
I'm a trombonist playing both classical and jazz music so I know exactly what you're keen to listening to. I've owned the M100 for sometime before returning it. I can safely say the M100 is much more geared towards DJ/Bass Head platforms. It's abysmal for Jazz and Classical listening. The bass is seriously distracting since it's more forward compared to the midranges, making midrange-centric music sound quite off. I would definitely recommend the ATHM50x over the V-Moda series in this regard.
661371
The 120 has coarse diamond, medium diamond, and flexible honing stations. The 130 has medium diamond, steel, and flexible honing stations.
1556537
I use both the 120 and the 130 headsets. The 130 has more features and also has slightly more base. Since I have high frequency hearing loss, I prefer the 120. I am able to let my wife use the 130 while I use the 120. One of the charging /transmitters is not plugged into the audio jacks and is simply used for a charging base. We do not specifically charge either headset on one base or the other, but instead use which base happens to be closest or empty. I also know that transmitting works for either, but as stated before the 130 has more features. (which I don't use) These are the best headsets I have ever used. I have purchased three 120's and one 130 over time. I use both the 120 and the 130 headsets. The 130 has more features and also has slightly more base. Since I have high frequency hearing loss, I prefer the 120. I am able to let my wife use the 130 while I use the 120. One of the charging /transmitters is not plugged into the audio jacks and is simply used for a charging base. We do not specifically charge either headset on one base or the other, but instead use which base happens to be closest or empty. I also know that transmitting works for either, but as stated before the 130 has more features. (which I don't use) These are the best... » Read More I use both the 120 and the 130 headsets. The 130 has more features and also has slightly more base. Since I have high frequency hearing loss, I prefer the 120. I am able to let my wife use the 130 while I use the 120. One of the charging /transmitters is not plugged into the audio jacks and is simply used for a charging base. We do not specifically charge either headset on one base or the other, but instead use which base happens to be closest or empty. I also know that transmitting works for either, but as stated before the 130 has more features. (which I don't use) These are the best headsets I have ever used. I have purchased three 120's and one 130 over time. « Show Less
1744538
Which is "better" just depends on your personal layout preferences and work flow. They all essentially do the same thing. The 2 main differences are if you want 4 channels (N4) or if you want velocity sensitive pads (Mixtrack or DDJ). I believe the DDJ is also built for Serato so if you're a Traktor/VDJ user you may want to avoid that one as well.
1944208
Casio FX-CP400L Is better than the TI. It offers a large screen that is stylus navigated and comes with all the math operations you will ever need.
791158
I had a pair of the 150s. Sounded very good, the 150 got dropped and cracked the magnet support. Not repairable so don't drop these!! Only real difference I see is the 350's can be turned up louder to cover more space. The 150's are a really good value. Good clear sound across the freq ranges, bass seems a little better on the 350's. Unless you have a really large area to cover the 150's are great. I replaced the 150's with the 350's just to have something different.