Besides the weight (2 lbs less), what's the difference between this pot and the other (same size, 3-ply, etc) that is $255?
776802
The 4508 uses a different kind of stainless steel that is magnetic, therefore it can be used with induction ranges and stovetops. If you don't have or plan to get an induction range, go with the cheaper version. However, induction is becoming more popular and those who have it seem to love it, so think long term.
776803
It has one of those black interiors; I thought it was stainless steel throughout, but it does have that non-stick surface inside...which I don't like, but I kept it anyway...too much trouble to send it back.
1475690
The stock pot it self is of heavy quality, I'd say 1/2 a a pound, the entire 3 pieces is over a pound. Though using the strainer and not having to lift and pour out water makes things easy.
937309
I'm afraid I don't know the answer to either question since I've already returned it. It was so light weight. Felt cheap..like inexpensive alum pots.
706062
These pots are aluminum without weighted bottoms. They are not by any means lightweight, but neither are they "heavy weight". I do have a problem with pots sliding on my stove top grates, but that is due to the grates more than the pots. If that's a principal concern for you you should look at pots and pans with thick heat disbursement bottoms. For the price I am very happy with the quality and performance of this set.
796797
I have both, and to be honest with you, I use the stainless one as a standard pot because it's much more shallow and great for quick boiling of something. Also, great for stews when I don't want to take out the extremely heavy cast iron Dutch oven.
801966
I'd say whichever is cheaper. This one is durable - but extremely heavy - and I rarely use it.
503607
There is no difference. Not sure why you are seeing it as more expensive. I'd just try to get the larger one at the lowest price you can find.
2162964
This pot is about the same thickness on the top and bottom. I have roasted several times and find the pot to cook evenly.
1227769
So, the LCS3 (which is currently priced at 22 and some change) is only a 10 inch diameter and has sloped sides measuring only at 1 3/4 in (might be 1 1/4 in I'm going off memory). The LK8S3 is 10.25 diameter and the sides are not sloped they are straight and measure 2 inches high. I just used the LK8S3 this morning for a fritata with eggs, red bell peppers, baby bellas, chopped kale, and sharp cheddar on top. I have a five person family and it is big enough to produce a yummy fritata that will feed us all. I start the meal on the stove top and finish in the oven. I like the high/straight sides of this dish because you could even bake a cake in it or a pot pie etc. I have a pan comparable to the LCS3 but it is smaller in diameter (I think an 8 or 9 in). Pans with a sloped side are great for sauting and performing cooking tasks that require moving the pan around to flip the food about. The LK8S3 is quite heavy so I could only assume the LCS3 "chef's" series skillet might be more pricey because it might be lighter weight for performing tasks that require flicking of the wrists and flipping without compromising the length of the diameter and the quality of the cast iron. Don't quote me on that, the last part is only an assumption. If you want an exact explanation I'm sure someone at Lodge would be happy to assist you. They probably have a contact link on their website. Hopefully I helped, I tried my best. Have a lovely day!
2029023
I don't have a scale to weigh it so this is what I came up with - I compared it to a 2 cup size Pyrex measuring cup and my best guess is it's slightly less, about an ounce less than the Pyrex cup. The pot has about a 1/4" think bottom that probably is what makes it heavier than what it looks like. It's not like a thin aluminum light weight pot that you would typically take camping. I hope this helps.
1912083
I'll go with what the other user posted. to me its big enough pot to do 8 quarts of whatever I am cooking. Its a beautiful pot and very sturdy, after all its a Commercial grade and it cleans up awesome. Works well on my PIC
1631252
Hi Lory, There is a new model of this same pot that is $18 less and free shipping and it has the measurements listed. Please check it out at Cuisinart MCP66-24 MultiClad Pro Stainless 8-Quart Stockpot with CoverMeasurements for the 8 quart: Product Dimensions: 13 x 10.4 x 7.7 inches ; 7 poundsShipping Weight: 7 poundsYou will enjoy your Cuisinart MultiClad Professional pot. I do, however, find that my old Magnalite Professional stainless steel cookware from twenty years ago is easier to clean. But I consider both brands equally good at cooking our food. Hi Lory, There is a new model of this same pot that is $18 less and free shipping and it has the measurements listed. Please check it out at Cuisinart MCP66-24 MultiClad Pro Stainless 8-Quart Stockpot with CoverMeasurements for the 8 quart: Product Dimensions: 13 x 10.4 x 7.7 inches ; 7 poundsShipping Weight: 7 poundsYou will enjoy your Cuisinart MultiClad Professional pot. I do, however, find that my old Magnalite Professional stainless steel cookware from twenty years ago is easier to... » Read More Hi Lory, There is a new model of this same pot that is $18 less and free shipping and it has the measurements listed. Please check it out at Cuisinart MCP66-24 MultiClad Pro Stainless 8-Quart Stockpot with CoverMeasurements for the 8 quart: Product Dimensions: 13 x 10.4 x 7.7 inches ; 7 poundsShipping Weight: 7 poundsYou will enjoy your Cuisinart MultiClad Professional pot. I do, however, find that my old Magnalite Professional stainless steel cookware from twenty years ago is easier to clean. But I consider both brands equally good at cooking our food. « Show Less
826796
The bottom of the pot has extra cladding that gives it some weight. The top is the same as the sides of the pan. it has a rim to keep it in position but no extra weight. The tops handle gets hot before the pot handles. I've used this pot several times a week for a long time and I still love it.
709624
Just by carefully looking over the specs in the product description, and I checked both, just like you did, here is what I found listed. The $32 ones are only .2 inches thick. The $48 dollar ones are .5 inches thick, which is the same as 1/2 an inch thick. The cheaper one at .2 inches thick is equal to 1/5th of an inch thick. So its about 3/16" thick. Less then a 1/4 inch in thickness. So it is less then half of the thickness of the $48 ones. I hope this helps!
931180
I am not sure. It is light weight metal, has sticky resistant. I really like this pot. Very durable.
253978
I am moving and have packed my scale. It's hard for me to believe is weighs 11 pounds. The pot feels a little weighty, but is a great cook pot for me. If a person has arthritis in their hands, then a lighter pot would be the wise choice. Hope this helps.
456585
This is no different than a large aluminum pot in terms of size and weight.