Does anyone else see a problem with the photos?
761303
If you're remarking on the "toy" dog - yes it's incongruous... however, I have been using this litter box now for several months and it has proven a God send for my very large (main coon size) cat. We have 2 cats and it is definitely big enough to accommodate both, especially the big guy (who had problems with "stuff' sticking to his rear and tail in the smaller enclosed box we had been using). I will, however, note that the handle and latches are a bit flimsy for the size of the box, but I just avoid using the handle to move it (I just slide it). I mentioned this in a review so hopefully the mfg. will address this in future evolutions of the box. If you're remarking on the "toy" dog - yes it's incongruous... however, I have been using this litter box now for several months and it has proven a God send for my very large (main coon size) cat. We have 2 cats and it is definitely big enough to accommodate both, especially the big guy (who had problems with "stuff' sticking to his rear and tail in the smaller enclosed box we had been using). I will, however, note that the handle and latches are a bit flimsy for the size of the box, but I just avoid using the handle to move it (I just slide it). I mentioned this in a review... » Read More If you're remarking on the "toy" dog - yes it's incongruous... however, I have been using this litter box now for several months and it has proven a God send for my very large (main coon size) cat. We have 2 cats and it is definitely big enough to accommodate both, especially the big guy (who had problems with "stuff' sticking to his rear and tail in the smaller enclosed box we had been using). I will, however, note that the handle and latches are a bit flimsy for the size of the box, but I just avoid using the handle to move it (I just slide it). I mentioned this in a review so hopefully the mfg. will address this in future evolutions of the box. « Show Less
761304
What do you mean? The dog being in the first picture? I have one of these and happy to help.
761305
I suppose a number of different animals could use this box. As a matter of fact, years ago, I had a pet rabbit, and instead of "going" in his cage, he started using the kitty litter box. lol
1114353
thanks for the input .....I had gone ahead and ordered the Scan-Snap but had decided to return it before it even arrived. Your response just made me know that I made the right decision. My plan now is to sort through all those photos and send the best of the lot to a company such as Best Photo Scanning and let them preserve them on discs for me.
1882724
Thanks for quick answer. I resell these and have had past issues with pictures not matching product. Appreciate the help.
420460
No, I'm very disappointed on the quality of the photos. Save yourself the anger and spend the extra money on a better camera, I wish I did!!
434672
Based on pics I take with and without case, the quality of pics are the same. It does not seem so
1215025
We have had many dissapointing 'fuzzy' pics as well. Especially indoors with the flash. Please see my review here (if they print it)! Essentially, our old 2 megapixel 'FujiFilm' cam puts the Olympus pics to shame. Maybe we got a defective unit?
1294214
Still working on it, haven't got to scanning my negatives yet, but can let you know when I do. So far, scanning is going smoothly. Occasionally, the machine resets itself, but considering I have tons of pics, I am not surprised.
1564515
They're likely not real. Many of the so-called results have photos clearly taken in different areas/lighting or even shopped. So many reviews are clearly one-sided and sound forced. Put more weight on the reviews that list pros/cons and don't use ostentatious vocabulary.
252019
I've read a lot about the sometimes soft, not crisp pictures. Where can you post the pics? Thanks.
1598257
We didn't have that issue; I mean just like with many cameras or even your phone it can be a harder to see the image while taken it! But the pics still turned out good!
2159808
I have not had that problem. When you save your picture, if it displays type to save it as. Save as jpeg, would be my only thought.
576525
Robert, I have scanned pictures from magazines but not photographs. These pics from the magazines are pixalated slightly but adequate. Poor quality pic to start with when scanning a magaizine pic. I use the scanner constantly and am more than happy with it since I'm always on the road. It travels nice and scans without any issues. If you're looking for top of the line scanned pics I think you'll be slightly disappointed. More than adequate for my needs though. Your question sparked my interest. I changed my settings to JPG @ 600dpi, just adequate not superb!
777401
it may be the wrong pictures, cause I saw on the page it had pics of 2 different cases
332039
Yes, I noticed this as well. The picture gives a bit of false advertising. I purchased mine over a year ago so they really have no excuse if the product changed to update that photo.
1532922
I'm having a similar problem. I've noticed it most in low light, when the subject moves. I don't think I've experienced it much outdoors in bright light. I've not taken the time to research it yet. I'd say I've been somewhat disappointed in the camera.
1229523
Hi there, I've attached some more photos that should be updated momentarily. Kind regards
585645
I think you are right here. I don't believe it is a lens problem as I have see this problem across a couple of lens. I did two things that seem to make a different, the first was I completely reset all the camera setting and second thing I did was up grade the camera fireware from version 1.0. 4. to version 1.0. 9. This seems to have made a difference.