What's the difference between nano black and nano blue/pink/silver: What's the difference besides price from USD$219 to USD$193 being ipod black more expensive than the others?????
751267
well, the black ipod nano is exclusive, i suppose...its now released only in an 8 GB version
249319
I bought a 4GB Nano 2 years ago because I only had 3GBs of music. Now I have 16GBs. Getting an iPod may give you the bug to listen to more music. With the ease of switching between songs and creating playlists, any mp3 player will drive you to experiment a little with your music taste. I also could not have cared less about the pictures or video (still don't) - but I got really into podcasts, and those take up space (if you like radio, check out podcasts - better quality, fewer interruptions). Bottom line - you will probably regret not spending the extra $50. The 80GB is a little more delicate than the nano (spinning hard drive vs. flash memory), but if you are just going to keep it at home it should not be an issue.
17068
HI Anne, I got the 4g nano for Christmas. My first Ipod. It's pretty cool. Anyway i have fit 7 hours of video(movies), 1 hour of video podcasts and 130 songs all at once and still had 300mb free. I think for 50 bucks more it's well worth it to double the size. I made my own movies from my dvd's so i left off credits to save space. not sure if an itunes movie would take more space. Hope tha helps
283709
Because you are using it for movies, you must get the 8gb model, the 4gb will fill up too fast. The 4 gb model is ok for a moderate sized music collection, most of those 30 or more gb players are usually mostly empty for most people, but not for movies. Since a 3g shuffle was just introduced, I would strongly recommend waiting for an update for the nano, im betting a 16 gb model is coming, frankly I'm surprised the current nanos don't come in a 16gb model, I think they are just trying to sell more ipod touches, which i cannot recommend unless you have a huge pile of cash to get rid of.
14754
500 CD's averaging 15 tracks per CD is a total of 7500 tracks. The iPod Touch 32 gig holds approximately 7,000 songs. A 40GB MP3 player will hold approximately 10,000 songs, but they are hard drive based and aren't designed for rough usage. 40 GB hard drive players are pretty hard to find these days so she might have to sacrifice some songs. She most likely doesn't actually listen to 500 CD's on a regular basis and you can always set iTunes to auto-rotate the songs for for fresh content. An alternative to the iPod Touch is the iPod Classic which packs 160 GB (around 40.000 songs) of storage. They are but around $250. The iPod Touch is also available in 64GB for a higher cost (around $300). An alternative to those two iPods is the Zune HD which packs 16, 32, or 64 gigabytes as well. These are considerably cheaper than the iPod equivilent. They also offered a 120 GB Zune (non-HD) but the price will vary as they are no longer manufactured. Sony also makes highly-regarded MP3 players that are comparable to MS and Apple. Besides These three companies, I can't really recommend buying anything else. I've owned all different types of MP3 players from Creative, Toshiba, Samsung, Sandisk, and the MS Zune but none of them come close to the tight integration that iTunes and iPod have. Every time I hit the sync button I'm confident the iPod will have exactly the songs I want on it. With Windows Media Player or the Zune software, a lot of the time it will end up partially syncing and some songs will duplicate. Album art is also a nightmare on these. As much as I don't like Apple's business model, their software and hardware are pretty hard to beat.
665790
found the following....site link at bottom 5.0 Generation MA146LL/A (30GB black) MA002LL/A (30GB white) 5.5 Generation MA444LL/A (30GB white) MA446LL/A (30GB black) found at this site: http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/faqs/answers/what-are-the-differences-between-all-the-ipod-models/
1451412
I'm not sure what "cheaper, black" unit you're referring to. I have a smaller unit that does NOT have an iPod attachment. The larger one pictured is definitely better. I especially like it because with the source button you can change from FM to AM to Aux to iPod -- and when you switch from iPod back to FM, it actually turns the iPod off.
1448398
I found that the price changed depending on the color of the case. The plain black one was $29.99 when i looked. I chose the purple one, even though it costs a little bit more. I like it.
764038
It's the same hardware, just different programs and applications. So in a sense, the price of an iPod touch went down $20.
894673
I could not find any info either on the differences. My guess is that the only difference in the im600USB is the ipod dock charging connection. Starting with the new iPod Nano 4th Gen., Apple changed the way they charge, USB only, no firewire, I believe. So, the original im600 is not able to charge the new Nanos, it plays them fine though.
868046
the screen isn't gorilla glass so it isn't the best quality available, if you meant the resolution which is 4.3-inch TFT LCD touchscreen with 480 x 854 (FWVGA) pixel resolution and 16 million colors compared to the current ipod touch's 1136-by-640-pixel resolution at 326 pixels per inch and you can see the difference but being over 3 years old the 43 with only froyo android 2.2 is showing it's age. I got mine here on amazon for 7 bucks to use as an ereader that actually fits in a pocket for dr visits.... if you take into account it's limitations and can find at a MUCH cheaper price it might play a few games ok but it might be hard to find many compatible with the froyo the screen isn't gorilla glass so it isn't the best quality available, if you meant the resolution which is 4.3-inch TFT LCD touchscreen with 480 x 854 (FWVGA) pixel resolution and 16 million colors compared to the current ipod touch's 1136-by-640-pixel resolution at 326 pixels per inch and you can see the difference but being over 3 years old the 43 with only froyo android 2.2 is showing it's age. I got mine here on amazon for 7 bucks to use as an ereader that actually fits in a pocket for dr visits.... if you take into account it's limitations and can find at a MUCH cheaper price it might... » Read More the screen isn't gorilla glass so it isn't the best quality available, if you meant the resolution which is 4.3-inch TFT LCD touchscreen with 480 x 854 (FWVGA) pixel resolution and 16 million colors compared to the current ipod touch's 1136-by-640-pixel resolution at 326 pixels per inch and you can see the difference but being over 3 years old the 43 with only froyo android 2.2 is showing it's age. I got mine here on amazon for 7 bucks to use as an ereader that actually fits in a pocket for dr visits.... if you take into account it's limitations and can find at a MUCH cheaper price it might play a few games ok but it might be hard to find many compatible with the froyo « Show Less
397444
The difference between the two is the Zen Nano Plus has direct cd recording. I don't know for sure why there is such a big price difference but my guess would be that the Zen Nano isn't produced anymore (the Zen Nano Plus is an upgrade) and so there's a limited quantity.
895605
I saw the gold one online, so I called a Sony number 877 and they said, no you can not buy the gold on in the US, they said US customers don't want gold, they want blue instead. This is very disappointing. You will have to look to eBay or buying it overseas in which it will cost more.
1629225
Silver, the black one is cheaper (HDJ-2000-K DJheadphones) while the silver is more expensive(HDJ-2000 Professional DJ Headphones), there is also a third one also black in color but is priced midpoint between the two models. Hope this helps.
1144135
I'd swear that when I got the Ultra Pod II back in November that the "Digital" model was bigger and heavier. Now, even the Pedco website describes the 2 as identical, but the Digital is $3.00 more than the II. I just saw someone at Dpreview mention he had all "3" sizes.B&H; describes the Digital as a "slightly modified" UltraPod II. I can't tell what the difference is and I have the UltraPod II.
119186
I went to JBL's Website and compared the white and black On Tour speakers. They were exactly the same. I think the reason the white model is more expensive is because it matches the ipod in color. Maybe they think ipod users would be willing to pay more to match their system.
1267415
the 2550 is (at this moment) $130 more than the 2500. That's a lot for the pandora feature. At that price, I'd recommend a used ipod touch 8gb 1g - which you can get for a few bucks more. It has a free app that can play pandora so you can connect it to your home theatre system. and you can also walk around the house (if you have wireless) and listen to pandora wherever you like. More bang for your buck.or get an iphone for $199 and it can even play pandora without wifi (using 3g or edge) then you can listen to pandora at home, in your car, wherever !