Is there difference between the ATH-ESW9 and the ATH-ESW9a?
779689
Per the head-fi forum, a great resource, the 9 uses Hokkaido cherry wood, and the 9a African paduak wood.
779690
if I remember corretly ATH-ESW9 is the Japanese verson since Audiotechnica is Japanese company and they just put a at the end for America Version which is for export.
640686
Sony only shows 3 ES receivers currently for sale on it's site - STR-DA1800ES, STR-DA2800ES, STR-DA5800ES. When the seller says (old version), I presume they mean it's no longer a current model.
2231814
this are mk2. here's a thread on head-fi talking about the differences:http://www.head-fi.org/t/651159/vsonic-mk-vs-mkii-differences
424645
Overall, the sonic and tonal quality is similar, but there are going to be subtle differences between the RX-A830 and RX-A1030 depending on the speakers and source connection. The RX-A1030 (and up) use different Digital to Analog Converters (DACs) than the RX-A830, and can offer a bit more clarity and detail in some situations (with digital inputs as opposed to Analog). Much depends on the capabilities and requirements of the speakers - Since the amplifier power output of these two receivers is fairly similar, there will not be a dramatic sonic difference with typical "mainstream" speakers that are reasonably easy to drive, particularly from analog sources. But, the ESS DACs in the RX-A1030 can offer that slight improvement, and for some it's enough improvement to pay the difference.
867416
Actually, the K800 operates at 900MHz, whereas the K790a operates at 850Mhz. The K790 for European/Asian markets is the K790i.
722419
I think the internals are exactly the same (but I haven't verified). I think the only difference is the DA34X is metal and the DA34 is plastic.
1963286
The one that I bought is A2, however I really didn't like this model. I had the DWA-140 before and accidentally broke it, so I figured this should be an improvement, however the DWA-140 would pick up the wireless signal a lot better than this model.
2015053
The link is broke but i think you are probably referring to a NON A model. This is identified in the name AG-AC90A. The A represents an updated firmware and an updated CD of manuals. You can update and get the new manuals from their website. This revision took place sometime in the fall of 2014.
674062
The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted towards retail consumers, while the SB6180 is targeted towards businesses or OEM use. The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted... » Read More The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted towards retail consumers, while the SB6180 is targeted towards businesses or OEM use. « Show Less
1160642
Sorry, I don't know. I just know that the one I got and I don't even know whether it is 9300 or 9309W is very good and I am totally satisfied.
1424195
Nope, other than this having a built in noise gate, the VT999 has a 3 band EQ, treble, mid, and bass, while the VT911 only has a tone knob, making this VT999 a more detailed option. . One thing tho is that the VT999 is nearly 1 and a half times bigger than the VT911, so it'll take up more space on a pedal board, in my opinion, it's worth it for a more detailed sound
255993
I strongly suspect they are the exact same device; the only difference I know of specifically, is that the Satechi version was available first. (I would have bought the Scosche version, otherwise, since it presently costs about $9 less than the Satechi.)
1168448
I would contact Audio-Technic directly and ask about it. This website sells them too, but I would go there as a last resort. http://www.audiocubes2.com/category/Headphone+Accessories/product/Audio-Technica_Replacement_3D_Wing_for_ATH-A900,A500.html
1830868
As far as i can tell, this one is just the older version that's been discontinued. The 931014 is newer, maybe has a few small visual changes but all the bits are the same.
2232744
The Differences are that One is only a Bluetooth Auxiliar Handset Whitout SIM Card Slot, the other One is a Complete 2G GSM Handset with SIM Card Slot Capability and Use like a Bluetooth Auxiliar Handset too
1523616
The models themselves are the same. The difference in lettering is based on the frequency programmed. See Shure's website to verify the best unit for you based on your geographic location and the primary location.
1963740
I don't believe there is any difference but I would suggest you go to Polk Audio's web site to verify. It could just be a name change on Amazon's site.