Comparison of the Tamron 18-250 I was just curious if anyone had compared the Tamron 18-250 to the Sigma 18-200? I am thinking of getting one of them and they are similar in price right now.
632567
hi .. had the same choice to make.. but finally went with the sigma.. 50mm shorter but i think the OS capability will eventually make the sigma a more worthwhile purchase.. I live in Singapore.. Price for the tamron is about $750 and the sigma at $840 (singapore dollars). hope this helps
632568
While it is a two lens solution, you might be better with the new Canon 18-55 and 55-250 lenses that are both Image stabilized and reportedly darn good lenses and not have to worry about where the Sigma you get has any of the quality issues they are known for.
632569
I have the same question, but will probably go with the Sigma because the OS will come in handy. I go to many concerts and need a lens that will allow me to get into the concert. A Canon L lens may be too big for a concert. The OS will allow me to take better shots with less light.If you dont need the OS and want the xtra 50mm then you must go with the Tamron. Quality wise, they seem close.I was looking at the Canon 55-250 with IS but it is large compared to the Sigma.
632570
I went for the Sigma and am happy with the result, particularly at the wide end. The image stabiliser has given me clear sharp images out to the full 200mm so have no qualms about its utility for my impending trip. Perhaps the only issue is its weight which makes the camera/lens/filters/hood, a hefty parcel to lug through crowded European cities.
632571
I have a 40D and plan a Europe trip with the intention of taking one lens, with the same choice. Questions are: Image quality at either end of the range? Macro quality, build quality? The utility of an additional 50mm of the Tamron?Critical perhaps is stabilisation with Sigma. Can anyone advise?
632572
I own the 18-250mm and it is really sharp and a good lens. I was very surprised. Not sure of the Sigma but I know with the Tamron it is a bargain at that price.
632573
Hei, everybody, you got to think in the OS version, considering the 200 is, depending on the camera, 280 or 320 mm; unless you use a tripod.Ed
1526808
Have not tried the tamron the cannon 24-70 2.8L II . Is a a purchase I'll never regret. It holds up against my friends zeiss primes plus blazing fast auto focus
357725
To my understanding it is usually believed that 2470 is a better version than this one in the same focal length range. But there are other things to consider. How important is it for you to have the extra versatility, that is, the focal length of 70 to 120? How much do you care about the lost of aperture range? (And that depends on what you plan to shoot most often.) How important is the price difference to you? And weight differs, too. Actually, I envy the newest 750 model so much! lol. It certainly deserves good lenses.
1779687
I had a d20 several years ago. Tamron has been a lens of choice from back in my film days. They have never let me down. That lens is very versatile and a great choice for your camera.
368611
I tested both the Tamron and Sigma 70 to 200 f 2/8.`and this is my review. Every one is hot for fast AF, well the Sigma had fast AF, but the pictures it took sucked. The Tamron with its AF system took Great photos, but had slower AF. I don't know what you want, but I want great pictures. As far as sporting events go, set lens to inf., and shoot away, no problem. Thats the way it was done before all this AF. Hands down Tamron wins. I could have got the Nikon version of this lens, but even if you can afford it, what wrong with bang for the buck?
75253
http://www.flickr.com/groups/d40slr/discuss/72157602509321717/?search=sigma+vs.+nikoni know it's been a while but that may give some insight.i have the sigma version and it's great value for the price paid.
52953
I need help deciding on a new lens for my Canon XSi. I have the 18-55mm that came with it and also a Sigma 100-300. I use the camera for high school sports and need something that gets good close up pictures when I'm not close.ThanksCR
1699312
Would love it if someone could comment on this. I am at the same decision point. Was also looking at the Sigma EF-530 DG Super, which is cheaper than the Canon 430. I am working with a Canon EOS Rebel XT and am an amateur. Translation, automated functionality is very desirable where possible ... but I'm also looking for a reasonable price. I'd really appreciate it if someone could share their advice. Thanks in advance for your help with this.
1211085
sigma recently came out with 17-70 version which has a C mark on it. its a good walk around woiyth f2.8 to 4. IS or OS is a good thing and its a personal decision. I have always preferred them as sometimes you forget to hold your breath for that magic moment which may not be as crisp otherwise.
992357
Although I have both Tamron and Sigma lenses, I prefer using Sigma. Better clarity, better constructed.
1463261
Did you ever get a lens? I'm making the same decision now. If so, what did you buy? Are you happy with your decision? Is there anything else you would add that would help me make a decision. Thanks!
1199011
My opinion goes against some other comments. I use a Sigma 150-500 and Sigma 70-300 (the newer version) on my D7100, shooting motorsports, where the speeds reached are quite a bit higher than kids playing football, and the focusing speed is very good, especially on the 120-300. I've never lost a shot due to slow focus, even when panning as the cars go by at 150mph+. I've used the 20-700 Sigma, and it's even a bit faster.
385957
I really enjoyed my Sigma 30mm, but the 24L is something different. $1100 is worth different things to different people. I found it to be a better focal length on a crop sensor (7D) for general indoor low light shooting.
2180989
I had an older Sigma 70-200 F/2.8 without VC. I did not own the older Tamron. I love this new Tamron lens and very glad that I spent the money on it. Noticeably sharper and the VC works great. I do shoot low light at concerts and focus has performed well. Also portraits with wide aperture.
410988
I had the same dilemma, and ended up with the Tamron. The only real negative is the occasional poor focus. The 270mm reach was great for my trip to Jamaica, capturing people jumping off of oceanside cliffs. In reality a 200mm reach would do great as well, and since im not blowing them up huge, a 135 might have fit the bill as well. the 6.3 is a little slow on the long end. If I had to pick between the 3 you mentioned, id pick the tamron again. if you arent blowing them up huge the pictures end up bring tack sharp. If I had a bigger budget, id probably go for the 24-105 f/4 L. I do not like the fact that a 72mm polarizing filter of good quality runs $150ish. I had the same dilemma, and ended up with the Tamron. The only real negative is the occasional poor focus. The 270mm reach was great for my trip to Jamaica, capturing people jumping off of oceanside cliffs. In reality a 200mm reach would do great as well, and since im not blowing them up huge, a 135 might have fit the bill as well. the 6.3 is a little slow on the long end. If I had to pick between the 3 you mentioned, id pick the tamron again. if you arent blowing them up huge the pictures end up bring tack sharp. If I had a bigger budget, id probably go for the 24-105 f/4 L. I do not like... » Read More I had the same dilemma, and ended up with the Tamron. The only real negative is the occasional poor focus. The 270mm reach was great for my trip to Jamaica, capturing people jumping off of oceanside cliffs. In reality a 200mm reach would do great as well, and since im not blowing them up huge, a 135 might have fit the bill as well. the 6.3 is a little slow on the long end. If I had to pick between the 3 you mentioned, id pick the tamron again. if you arent blowing them up huge the pictures end up bring tack sharp. If I had a bigger budget, id probably go for the 24-105 f/4 L. I do not like the fact that a 72mm polarizing filter of good quality runs $150ish. « Show Less
1609775
PD thank you for the great review. What do you guys think about the new Tamron 70-200mm ?
1756270
No personal experience with the Tamron, but sure it is excellent as well. I really like my Sigma and have no issues with it at all. Look up Matt Granger on YouTube for an excellent comparison on Nikon, Sigma and Tamron versions of this lens.