Will this fit a 44mm objective scope without risers?
652693
Simple answer yes. I have a Nikon M 223 with 42 mm objective lens and have about .250 (1/4) inch clearance.
652694
Hello, I have the Burris PEPR mount on my flat top AR with a Hogue free float tube and I have a Simmons 3-10x44 Scope and it clears by about 5/8". While the free float tube is below the flat top, I would still have at better than 3/8" clearance if the rail was extended forward. Beware of some of the non-Burris look-a-like mounts as the centerline height above the rail is not as tall as the Burris mount and could cause clearance problems as well as hinder proper eye alignment. Hope this helps
652695
Yes sir it will fit. I have a 6x25x50mm with a 1" tube mounted on a flattop receiver with the DPMS carbon free float tube. Plenty of room w/o use of a riser.
351915
It is a one inch tube so it will work. High rings are higher than they need to be for a 40mm objective but it will work.
8747
I think I mounted it with normal height rings. It did not need anything special on my cz455 .17 hmr with 3/8 dovetail
1089972
Low works good on my 40mm, there is still room between barrel and bell of scope, I would think a 44mm should fit perfect with the low mount.
790165
I used a Ziess 3-9 40mm on mine and it fit great. If you mount the scope yourself be sure to use a little bit of thread locker on the mounting screws.
86019
You will need a riser. I found one at Academy for about $30.00. Works great and scope is very accurate.
2120657
The Brass Stacker itself sits quite high. I had to add a cheek pad on top of the cheek rest build into my Boyd's stock. I'm not familiar with the shape of the scope you're using, but I would recommend getting the lowest rings that will give your scope clearance.
321488
It depend if you have a high front sight and to fix that you need to have a riser 1/2" or 3/4" depend on your preference.
1020775
Depends a lot on the height of the scope rings you use. Generally the medium riser is sufficient, assuming you have a standard rail on your rifle.
2011582
No. If I remember correctly, these are the medium rings. A scope with a 50mm objective lens would require the tall version of these rings. If there is one - guess it's time for some research.
378528
Yes it will as long as it has a picatinny upper. You do not need a riser, the mount is high enough. I have one mounted on an AR.
2004667
No you will need a riser to clear front sight. Possibly a half inch riser will work.
1654490
They should work as long as the objective(large end) of the scope is under 44mm.
1394368
It will probably be too tall. I love the riser though. I needed to get my scope off the upper rail just high enough to be able to put the scope protective caps on. Works like a champ and brings it up to eye level for me. Maybe consider ditching the iron sights you have now and switch to magpuls offset sights. Little pricy but that's what I did. Hope this helps good luck.
1782601
I have a 40 mm scope 1 inch tube with a weaver rail and it was perfect. I don't think you will a problem with a 44 mm scope.
693690
Yes this will raise it 1" higher. I have a 50mm scope and had to buy this for the same reason and also lower the co-witness of the a2 front sight
2143003
No rings, make sure you consider the objective lens size when buying rings. 40mm objective is quite big, I needed medium height rings to raise this high enough from the dovetail grooves on a Marlin 60N .22 rifle