What camera is better overall, Sony RX10 or A6000? What I am after is the speed and accuracy of autofocus. Also want to know if the A6000 is better image quality at higher ISO compared to NEX-7, which I own and think is already one of the best even...
652337
I have an a6000 and now I just bought the RX10, used from Amazon Warehouse deals for under $800 and it's so much better image quality wise then say, an a6000 with kit lens or 16mm F2.8 pancake lens. I have both cameras now and love them both but if you needed to pick just one, here is my recommendations... If you are a VIDEO person, get the RX10. If still image quality with fast accurate AF is your deal breaker, an a6000 with the 18-105 F4 G lens is a killer combo. NEX-7 vs a6000??? I sold my a77 and didn't like the NEX-7 or a65 becuase of horrible low light, high ISO image results. The a6000 with same 24megapixels + new bionz-x processor = excellent low light camera, close to a99's low light performance in stills. No mic input (stay with NEX-7) if that's a deal breaker but overall the a6000 is better than the NEX-7 in almost every way, including the new alpha style menu structure.
79946
Sharp! Could be the best lens you can get for the a6000 but very expensive. My favorite lens along with Zeiss Touit 32mm. Ask yourself if you like this 35mm angle of view and is it worth the price.
1946766
Nicon P600 is the best camera I have ever owned. Clearer, sharp pictures, unending Zoom and a little smaller than Canon EOS Rebel. I recommend 100%. The P610 is a lot more expensive, with nothing to add. You will be very happy.
1132965
IMHO, LX7 is better than Sony RX100 for the reasons as following:1. Wider lens, 24mm vs 28mm of RX1002. Fast lens, F1.4-2.3 vs F1.8-4.9 of RX1003. Image stabilizer is one stop better than RX1004. LX7's iAUTO is arguably the best by most of Pro's review (but I found the color is way off in certain cases).
953428
Rx100 has a bigger sensor, so the quality of the image is much better. The price between bouth cameras reflect that difference. It is been said that the menus and shooting experience of the sony is so so. I had the lx7 and the menu and the controls are very intuitives. If the picture quality is your preference in a pocket camera, the Ricoh Gr is the best chooise (more expensive too: it has an Aspc sensor, like your D7000) but is has a focal fixed lens (28mm) instead of a zoom. All these cameras shoot in raw, have manual exposition and other dslr functions.
221388
I faced the same dilemma and went through many sites (dpreview, thewirecutter, etc.) & YouTube videos (Tony Northrup, few others) before settling on the E-M10. I think the consensus was that the a6000 was slightly better image & feature-wise, but the Oly was smaller, cheaper, and most importantly had a far greater selection of lenses.
1963665
Short version.... bigger sensor on the rx100 (better picture quality) versus faster/wider lenses on the lx7 (better low light performance and a more versatile zoom). Both are great cameras, if budget is not a problem go with the rx100. If you go otherwise with the lx7 you will get better Low light performance and a more versatile lenses for your money. Never the less... both are awesome cameras.
356707
The D5000 is a very good camera. If you want a full frame the D600 is great. What you gain, in my opinion, is better high ISO performance. The picture quality is mainly up to uou no matter what camera upu use. If I were you, I wouldn't spend much time researching and agonizing over it. If you want higher ISO performance, the D600 is a good choice. Just buy it. Then, go out and take lots of pictures. Have fun!
212784
Wanted to let you all know that I decided on the D7000 and picked one up today. Couldn't be happier. Continuous autofocus during video shooting is useless on it, but I'm learning to manually focus, which is actually more rewarding for me; when shooting at f/1.8 you can get a very cinematic look focusing manually, even when you're chasing around your twin toddlers!
1983280
I have used the Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS on my NEX 7 and on the Sony A7, but I have not used it on the A6000 so I cannot be of help to Kenny. Sorry.
785160
I have both NEX7 and A7R. I bought the 10-18 for the NEX7. After buying the A7R I tried the 10-18. It works fine, but there is a little bit of vignetting at 10mm, so you have to move the focal length up to about 12mm to eliminate the vig. Of course, you can crop the 10mm pic. or use the A7R in crop mode, too. I read that others had the same experience. The 10-18 is a very good lens on either camera, and your mileage may vary...
1245263
Samsung has bad AF in low light, which you don't need here. A6000 has horrible LCD which you don't need as well as it's easy to frame such shoot. For such shoot you don't need good EVF as well (NX30 has one of the worst EVFs) So, it's good sensor + zoom lens + good video. Take sony a6000/5000, buy some manual lens as it's much cheaper that way and there you go... A5000 + such lens will cost you 250$. Other than DSLRs, zoom lenses are expensive.
555744
I would suggest reading the reviews on BHPHOTO website, they are usually very objective and helpful. Sony makes a 35mm for the a7 that is not a Carl Zeiss and is cheaper.
1588522
Probably not. RX100 M2 is about the same compared to the NEX-5T at any ISO level (difference of megapixels count more of a concern on small sensors, but RX models are somehow 'perfectly' optimized--like comparing iOS to battery-fasting Android), although the speed of the 5T is quite something ideal, as it has phase detection. Look, consider the upcoming A6000. It is a little pricier against the 5T, plus you get the hot shoe and internal flash. Speed is the same, in spite of more contrast and phase points. It is very difficult to improve because Sony is already ahead of every other camera maker in terms of sensor and processing = remarkable image clarity. Value wise, they are about the same. Maybe RX100 is the better choice, unless shooting sports and low light where the 5T is the best bet. For video work, RX100/M2 is the only ideal choice because NEX always will overheat, shutting down the camera. This is because the large sensor and processor do not have a heat sink as required to prevent the issue, although in consequence the point of a DSLR's size does reflect more room to breathe.
2205117
You want the la-ea2 for the Nex 6. The 4 is for full frame cameras. The focus for my sigma 12-24 is perfect and fast. These units have there own electronics for exposure and focus. The la-ea1 does not and is very slow. So if your sticking with the nex6 go for the 2. If your planning on getting the A7, then go with the 4. Hope that helps.
542771
If you are looking to update and stick with the a-mount system, the A99 is the way to go. I have both and the full frame sensor on the A99 along with the added features and better low light performance makes it my go to camera. The only thing the a A77 is better at is speed, Fps. Your other option is to go mirrorless like the A7 series and use an adapter like the LEA4 to use your A - mount glass. It's an amazing camera for the money I have the A7. The only negative is the lack of in-body stabilization which is remedied by the A7 mk 2 that just came out. Hit up your local camera store and play If you are looking to update and stick with the a-mount system, the A99 is the way to go. I have both and the full frame sensor on the A99 along with the added features and better low light performance makes it my go to camera. The only thing the a A77 is better at is speed, Fps. Your other option is to go mirrorless like the A7 series and use an adapter like the LEA4 to use your A - mount glass. It's an amazing camera for the money I have the A7. The only negative is the lack of in-body stabilization which is remedied by the A7 mk 2 that just came out. Hit up your local camera store and play
1375619
The p7100 takes really nice shots in auto mode. However, it is a touch slower than I would like. Granted, I am comparing it do a D7000...