Mxl 770 vs Mxl 3000 ?
629699
Sorry. Have no experience with the 3000. However, for voice work the 770 serves my purposes extremely well.
629700
I don't know about the MXL 3000 but all I can say is the MXL 770 is superb I use it to make rap songs and R&B; songs and it is fantastic. you get professional sound quality 4 very very affordable price. it sounds real clear the clarity is actually like you're in a professional studio but you're at home.
1178655
asus uses a heatpipe cooling system as opposed to gigabyte's 3x fan system. The only difference between evga asus gigabyte msi version of the 770 is the cooling system and occasionally very slight clock speed differences. This asus card has the best cooling system from what i read and although i got a dud sadly 99% of people say it's a great card.
1144692
Assuming you meant MX100, as there is no M100: "The MX100 is Crucial's new mainstream drive, replacing the popular M500 while the M550 will continue to serve the higher performance market. ... The short summary is that the MX100 builds on the same architecture as the M500 and M550. The only fundamental difference is the NAND inside as the controller is the same Marvell 88SS9189 silicon as found inside the M550." - AnandTech's MX100 Review
1854489
They are very similar except that the MX is designed to handle more weight. The specs for the MX on the Ergotron website say it will handle up to 30 lbs. As other answers indicate, the LX is spec'd at about 20lbs. I use it for a 21" monitor that is well beneath 20lbs, so I just have the LX. If you are getting anywhere near the max capacity, a good safety measure is to over spec your installment for safety sake and go for the MX. Otherwise the LX will be adequate. If you or a child is prone to grabbing the monitor and moving it quickly, or if it is moved often in use, etc., go for the MX. Whichever one you choose, it is mandatory that it will be well mounted on a very strong wall that will support the weight and the torque that will be imposed on the unit and mount. Plasterboard or anything flexible most likely won't offer that kind of surface with re-inforceement in back. My reinforcement is the studs in the wall. The mount system is only as strong as the weakest segment within the unit and mounting surface construction. It's not a big deal if you do it right. It is a big deal if the wall mount is under spec'd or not not sufficiently mounted. Mount it right and enjoy it.
102222
Well if you have the money, save for a 970, more performance and better power consumption. If you are still getting the 770. You should check your PSU if you have 2x6 & 2x8.My msi 770 came with 2x8 standalone connectors that u can use on your PSU but i didnt need it. MY PSU(Corsair CX600) has 2 2x8 connectors. Get a 600w Good PSU(Like corsair or seasonic or something)
230205
Both of these have similar TDP's and they use the same amount of volts, and this one uses the Richland vs the trinity architexture, but both are FM2. I think it comes down to preference. If you get this, you should have enough cores and clock speed to process games and whatever for 2-5 years, and if you're into upgrading in a year or so, the 750k will be awesome!
1599222
The big question is are you running multiple monitors over 1080p? If you are running a single or dual monitors @ 1080p I would go with the 770.. If you are running 2-3 monitors at a res higher than 1080p than the extra 2GB of VRAM may be useful.
2117139
I too am wondering the same question. Picked up the 1100IS the other day for $150 but now I see the 770IS for $160. I know MP's aren't too important on the little cameras (not DSLR's) but can't help to think the 770IS is better because of it. Anyone have a tech opinion of the two?
575314
I think there is no such thing as a MX500, it is the M500. There is the M550 which delivers similar performace as the MX100 Series. The latter is newer and faster than the ageing M500. There is a preference towards the latest MX100. I would definitely go for the MX100.
1998773
They are very similar. I have the 780. Here are the differences I found: 1. Virtual Wall Lighthouse on the 780 is different that the mere Virtual Wall on the 770. The virtual wall simply contains the Roomba in the room. The Virtual lighthouse does 3 things: a) it contains it in the room just like the Virtual Wall; but then it b) allows it to go to next room when first is complete, and c.) serves as a 'lighthouse' so Roomba can find it's way back to the docking station when it is 'out of sight' of it in the next room. 2. The buttons on the 780 are 'touch keys' whereas I think on the 770 are 'buttons' 3. The 780 has a 'trash bin full' indicator. A pretty good comparison http://www.amazon.com/iRobot-Roomba-Vacuum-Cleaning-Allergies/dp/B005F1PT32/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1384824460&sr=8-4&keywords=roomba+770 I personally have not yet found the differences to be worth it. I may figure how to use the lighthouse thing more later, but for now in my situation the 'next' room is 'under construction' and we are not having Roomba go into there. Also the primary room is a large 'great room' ... 750 sf, so Roomba may be out of juice before it could do the next section anyway. If you simply want it to do one room at a time, no need to go to the 780. If you have multiple rooms you want it to automatically do, and they're not huge, a lighthouse at each door may help. I was new to this technology when I purchased. I will try these out when our 'next room' is completed (within the next month or so I hope). If these Lighthouses do not add significant functionality here, then I'd definitely go the 770 cheaper route next time. Full bin indicator - if you empty it every time between used, not worth it unless maybe a lot of dust, pet hair that could fill it up before a room is cleaned. (info chart is a little confusing on whether the 770 has this or not.) Touch keys .. your call. I wouldn't pay for the difference.
1128706
Hello Paulo,Very little difference. Unless either of the following are important features to you, I would strongly consider saving the $150. Directly from the Yamaha website:RX-V673 vs RX-V675Last Update: 05/16/2013The RX-V675 has the following differences/advantages over the RX-V673:1. MHL supports full HD video and audio from mobile phones and portable devices2. FLAC or WAV 192kHz/24-bit audio playback Dimensons and Power are the same:(WxHxD) 17 1/8" x 6 3/4" x 14 3/8"105w x 7 Rated Output Power (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz, 0.09 % THD, 2 ch driven) 90w x 2 Rated Output Power (8 ohms, 1 kHz, 0.9 % THD, 2 ch driven) Hello Paulo,Very little difference. Unless either of the following are important features to you, I would strongly consider saving the $150. Directly from the Yamaha website:RX-V673 vs RX-V675Last Update: 05/16/2013The RX-V675 has the following differences/advantages over the RX-V673:1. MHL supports full HD video and audio from mobile phones and portable devices2. FLAC or WAV 192kHz/24-bit audio playback Dimensons and Power are the same:(WxHxD) 17 1/8" x 6 3/4" x 14 3/8"105w x 7... » Read More Hello Paulo,Very little difference. Unless either of the following are important features to you, I would strongly consider saving the $150. Directly from the Yamaha website:RX-V673 vs RX-V675Last Update: 05/16/2013The RX-V675 has the following differences/advantages over the RX-V673:1. MHL supports full HD video and audio from mobile phones and portable devices2. FLAC or WAV 192kHz/24-bit audio playback Dimensons and Power are the same:(WxHxD) 17 1/8" x 6 3/4" x 14 3/8"105w x 7 Rated Output Power (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz, 0.09 % THD, 2 ch driven) 90w x 2 Rated Output Power (8 ohms, 1 kHz, 0.9 % THD, 2 ch driven) « Show Less
886470
The 670 is a year older than the 770 and the pricing hasn't been updated. Just buy a 7xx series now if you are going to buy new...or better yet, wait until the 9 series comes out.
391369
3000 rated at 250 watts 5000 is ~ 400 watts , 3000 has 6.5 " woofer 5000 has 8 " woofer, 3000 has 2 mid range each side in sound bar, 5000 has 3 mid range each side . 3000 is a little less priced than the 5000 . I was going to get the 3000 which would have been just fine for large master bedroom, I do not regret getting the 5000 for just a little more . Later,. I can use in in a living room or any room, someday Both are very good units !
2194279
Well, I do own both but I play mostly classic rock and I don't really play anything metal (at least not anything I would call metal) so I can't really say. The CS400 works better for me but the DC9 has the "one knob" compression that is easy to set and comes in a thick metal box. The DC9 is a clone of the old MXR Dyna Comp compressor they made in the late 70's-early 80's. There are some "shoot out" videos of the Behringer vs the MXR on YouTube that are pretty good. The DC9 may be just what you want if you are not familiar with compressors and compression ratios and release time and all that tech stuff. The DC9 works good. Well, I do own both but I play mostly classic rock and I don't really play anything metal (at least not anything I would call metal) so I can't really say. The CS400 works better for me but the DC9 has the "one knob" compression that is easy to set and comes in a thick metal box. The DC9 is a clone of the old MXR Dyna Comp compressor they made in the late 70's-early 80's. There are some "shoot out" videos of the Behringer vs the MXR on YouTube that are pretty good. The DC9 may be just what you want if you are not familiar with compressors and compression ratios and... » Read More Well, I do own both but I play mostly classic rock and I don't really play anything metal (at least not anything I would call metal) so I can't really say. The CS400 works better for me but the DC9 has the "one knob" compression that is easy to set and comes in a thick metal box. The DC9 is a clone of the old MXR Dyna Comp compressor they made in the late 70's-early 80's. There are some "shoot out" videos of the Behringer vs the MXR on YouTube that are pretty good. The DC9 may be just what you want if you are not familiar with compressors and compression ratios and release time and all that tech stuff. The DC9 works good. « Show Less
2065053
You are correct. The 68xx series all have a sturdy 770M within their cover.
2163311
The 780 ti is faster and cheaper. It might be a bit closer at super high resolutions like 4k but still go for the 780 ti
1587855
Thanks. So if the 1120 and the VSX-31 are almost exactly the same price, it sounds like I should go for the 1120.