are the pixels discernable, because i know 27 inch monitor that is 2560 x 1440 makes the pixels not discernable and i like it.
649408
If you plant your face in the screen you can see the pixels, it is not a high density display. From a normal viewing distance it's extremely sharp and you cannot see the pixels
871839
I'm not sure.I haven't noticed anything about that.It's is a nice monitor for the price.About $89.00 right now on ebay or amazon.
555936
Well you aren't going to be able to get 2560x1600, which is what retina display is. This monitor has 1920x1200 resolution.
1780853
Yes it is, beware of bad pixels. I bought this monitor and got 3 dead pixels and 4 stuck pixels.
1857539
We've updated the monitor, so the actual display pixels of this item is 1440 x 900. Thank you.
978713
I'm running 4 @ 1920x1080 and all are 24 inches and up with very few issues. Make sure your power supply is at the upper end of the spectrum, I have to unplug my monitors when I reboot which is a little irritating, but it seems related to the power supply and nothing else. Also pay close attention to the listed issues with DVI / HTMI / Display Port.
137273
It says on the box High quality 2048 x 1536 resolution for crisp display. That's about all I can tell you. :)
1163204
Thanks for the extra information, interesting about the rectangular pixels. This seems like a much bigger project than I thought it was going to be. I tried a lot of resolutions and found one that appears to leave only one column of pixels on the right side unused. It's 430x222. Funny how a single digit can make a significant difference.
2178985
I'm also interested since my monitor will be above eyesight. I wouldn't want the resolution to look darker or wither.
351756
Was only able to go up 1080P@60hz by default ... I am using a gtx 670 for the test.I did a custom resolution through nv control panel and it actually go up to 2560x1440 but it didn't look good at all. DVI and DisplayPort seem to have no issues with it.
2205917
Heres my advice, Get the 29" Ultra Wide, 2560x1080 is amazing. $423 is worth the price. you will never go back to dual monitors ever again. Now that being said, you first have to get used to having a shorter monitor but will love the ultra widescreen. Almost all games I have played support the 2560x1080 (I love all the extra space) and yes games do keep their aspec ratio, you just see more on screen without stretching or squishing. anywho GET IT! or the $1000 LG.Now if you have funds for something bigger and better then checkout the LG 34UM95with a resolution of 3440 x 1440https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnrxNfxRK_4 Heres my advice, Get the 29" Ultra Wide, 2560x1080 is amazing. $423 is worth the price. you will never go back to dual monitors ever again. Now that being said, you first have to get used to having a shorter monitor but will love the ultra widescreen. Almost all games I have played support the 2560x1080 (I love all the extra space) and yes games do keep their aspec ratio, you just see more on screen without stretching or squishing. anywho GET IT! or the $1000 LG.Now if you have funds for something bigger and better then checkout the LG 34UM95with a resolution of 3440 x... » Read More Heres my advice, Get the 29" Ultra Wide, 2560x1080 is amazing. $423 is worth the price. you will never go back to dual monitors ever again. Now that being said, you first have to get used to having a shorter monitor but will love the ultra widescreen. Almost all games I have played support the 2560x1080 (I love all the extra space) and yes games do keep their aspec ratio, you just see more on screen without stretching or squishing. anywho GET IT! or the $1000 LG.Now if you have funds for something bigger and better then checkout the LG 34UM95with a resolution of 3440 x 1440https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnrxNfxRK_4 « Show Less
1967962
Nevermind this screen has 1920x1080. Just got it in the mail. Really odd that they listed it as the lower one..
1184631
I now have 4 x Dell P2715Q 4k 60hz monitors running on the NVS 510 just fine. No noticeable difference from 4 x 1440p. Open a couple hd videos at once and they will get choppy but normal office work is totally fine. I would give extreme caution about 2160p at 27" though. I've run into several issues with this pixel density on Windows. Several programs have nearly invisible UI elements they are so small. Many/most programs ignore windows display magnification settings so you're at the mercy of the application developers to update their software. I'm trying to decide right now if I should return the 4 monitors and give it another year or stick it out. If this wasn't a business machine with only a few pro apps that will hopefully be updated over the next few months and was running many consumer apps, there would be no question. I'd be returning them and waiting for sure. It would be a mess. On the other hand, 1440p at 27" is not quite dense enough. Text is a little fuzzy. Some UI elements a little pixelated. But at least you can see everything.
1018596
Hi I'm sorry If it's not Displayport 1.2 , it's not compatible with this 2560x1440 resolution. Thank you.
591860
The monitor is great, James. The colors are bright, vivid and the edges are clear and crisp. The 1900x1200 resolution is also more beneficial than a typical 1920x1080 (or 1080p) because you get better vertical resolution. I have this as my primary display in place of a Samsung 24" 1920x1200 LCD and I would have to say that the image on this display is actually better. I suppose that is the luxury you get with an IPS panel!
448853
The static contrast ratio is 3,000:1 instead of 2,000:1 as well. That's one of the best I've seen for LCD.
1677350
its as good as any 1280x1080 monitor i wouldnt recommend it but you can see somewhat.