Is there a different in the bushnell truth range finder and the primos truth range finder
632235
the non primos one has clear shot. its cool, it tells you the highest point of your arrows path so you can see if a branch is in the way. all in all not needed but nice to have. it is also able to be calibrated where the primos is not. there is definitely more to the non primos, its the next edition to it looks like primo stopped the partnershipBushnell 202442 The Truth ARC 4x20mm Bowhunting Laser Rangefinder with Clear Shot the video goes over the new stuff
632236
the non primos one has clear shot. its cool, it tells you the highest point of your arrows path so you can see if a branch is in the way. all in all not needed but nice to have. it is also able to be calibrated where the primos is not. there is definitely more to the non primos, its the next edition to it looks like primo stopped the partnership http://www.amazon.com/Bushnell-202442-4x20mm-Bowhunting-Rangefinder/dp/B00ILFLT24/ref=dp_ob_title_sports the video goes over the new stuff
1024508
It comes in 2 versions, one with Mil-Dot, the other one with range finder. Mine is the rangefinder version. Amazon has both, just make sure to select the version you're looking for.
788451
Make sure you are not picking up something behind the target. I have never had any accuracy problems with mine. Also, how do you know that it is 100 instead of 90? This model doesn't have gps btw.
740414
The GPS is suppose to show yardage to certain points as well as to the green, as should also tell you how far you hit the ball. I havenot had time to play with anything but yardages to the green. I think you need to download the maps for each course for free. I have donethat but have not tried to do any of the options. The directions are quite vague. You may want to call the Bushnell tech line: 800-423-3537
361105
The Elimator II is made by Burris not Bushnell, this is a good scope but only does ranging
1606563
Well, yes and no. Both will work, and some people prefer one, some the other. Personally I find it's best to have *both* an finder like this and a "red dot" or "crosshair" non-magnifying finder (like the EZ Finder II; I use a Rigel Quickfinder myself). The non-magnifying finders are very quick and easy for pointing at or near visible objects. Finders like this are a little bit harder to get your initial bearings, but once you know where you're pointing it's then easy to start hunting. I usually start with my non-magnifying finder, and then switch to the optical finder as needed. The optical finder is best for fainter objects not close to any obvious brighter stars. Well, yes and no. Both will work, and some people prefer one, some the other. Personally I find it's best to have *both* an finder like this and a "red dot" or "crosshair" non-magnifying finder (like the EZ Finder II; I use a Rigel Quickfinder myself). The non-magnifying finders are very quick and easy for pointing at or near visible objects. Finders like this are a little bit harder to get your initial bearings, but once you know where you're pointing it's then easy to start hunting. I usually start with my non-magnifying finder, and then switch to the... » Read More Well, yes and no. Both will work, and some people prefer one, some the other. Personally I find it's best to have *both* an finder like this and a "red dot" or "crosshair" non-magnifying finder (like the EZ Finder II; I use a Rigel Quickfinder myself). The non-magnifying finders are very quick and easy for pointing at or near visible objects. Finders like this are a little bit harder to get your initial bearings, but once you know where you're pointing it's then easy to start hunting. I usually start with my non-magnifying finder, and then switch to the optical finder as needed. The optical finder is best for fainter objects not close to any obvious brighter stars. « Show Less
1140571
I've heard that motionbased.com adjusts the elevation readings now to reflect more accurate elevations. I don't own one yet, but am looking to buying one and have heard this from a few friends who own the 305. This, from what I understand, is the 305's biggest weakness! However, I still want one above any other of its kind...
440001
First http://www.bushnell.com/getmedia/7efa876c-ffe9-48fa-bd4a-0b3c3c9a27ce/2012_EliteTactical_SpecialReticles.pdf?ext=.pdf
1597411
Not sure, I'm a beginner with experience with a cheaper brand. After using this model I must admit my old metal detector "toraso cultus" is much easier to use and detects just as deep. I'm not certain the price gives me that much more of a detector. I'm still learning it but am becoming a little frustrated.
616892
Depends on how far your comfortable taking a shot. The range finder is accurate to within a few yards. I measured it against known distances. For me I will not taken a shot longer than 300 yards.
1343881
Sorry I can't give you a definitive answer. I purchased this rangefinder for my husband and he uses it for golf.
39795
Well its funny you ask...my buddy just purchased the MTAC and after testing both of them out. This is what I concluded.Clarity...Both are equaldurability...Both are equalthe only advantage I see is that the Bushnell is more compact and the reticle doesn't cover the target as much and it is easier because of the lever to switch magnification. I like my Bushnell more than his burris but he likes his over mine cause he likes the large reticle. I have no complaints and love the scope. Both do slightly bleed in super dark settings on full brightness but all you do is turn it down 3 clicks and your there. Hope this helps.Justin Lincoln Well its funny you ask...my buddy just purchased the MTAC and after testing both of them out. This is what I concluded.Clarity...Both are equaldurability...Both are equalthe only advantage I see is that the Bushnell is more compact and the reticle doesn't cover the target as much and it is easier because of the lever to switch magnification. I like my Bushnell more than his burris but he likes his over mine cause he likes the large reticle. I have no complaints and love the scope. Both do slightly bleed in super dark settings on full brightness but all you do is turn it... » Read More Well its funny you ask...my buddy just purchased the MTAC and after testing both of them out. This is what I concluded.Clarity...Both are equaldurability...Both are equalthe only advantage I see is that the Bushnell is more compact and the reticle doesn't cover the target as much and it is easier because of the lever to switch magnification. I like my Bushnell more than his burris but he likes his over mine cause he likes the large reticle. I have no complaints and love the scope. Both do slightly bleed in super dark settings on full brightness but all you do is turn it down 3 clicks and your there. Hope this helps.Justin Lincoln « Show Less
1471529
I do not know the difference. I suggest that Bradley go to the Mueller web site and pick out one model of each type of scope and compare the Features list and the Specifications list.
740417
my advice to Don is stay away from the xgc+.I threw the one I had in the garbage. it didn't work right when I received it,so I sent it back to bushnell for repair.when it came back it still did not work.
788452
Ive had this range finder for 3 years now. It is deadly accurate. Make sure your hitting the pin and its dead on. If the GPS next to you gives a different reading it is wrong. I have had that come up several times. I trust the laser in my hand over the satellite 12000 miles away. If I check GPS locator on my smartphone its never dead on. Misses by 30 feet (10 yards) sometimes.
2044659
I'm not sure of the stand lofts built in, but it's all crap anyway because there is no loft angle built into the gizmo. It only tracks ball speed. As such, if you miss hit the ball, it gives a completely bogus distance. This machine is junk. Do not buy it. I returned mine within a week or two. Even on perfect hits, it was not accurate compared to my rangefinder that is very accurate.
475044
Yes, just make sure that the detector you buy goes the distance. They are different. I bought 2 detectors. First one set up about 450 yards away and then the 2nd one about 100 ydsaway to let me know when someone is closer. I love them !