What's the difference between this model and the Makita XVJ03Z? Since the latter has no reviews, is it just a newer model?
649401
No difference. As far as I can tell. Just a new part number, many Makita tools have had a number change in the last two years.
649402
According to the Makita web site the xvj03z has an addition computer built into the tool. It is additional protection from over discharging and overheating the tool. We have never encountered either problem with the bjv18oz.
1444694
I am very pleased with the sander. I can not comment on the upgrade since I am not familiar with it. The B03710 sands much faster and has less vibration than the one I had before. And I like that it uses 1/3 sheet of paper.I would recommend it. NH
1884876
Because Home Depot doesn't care how the product gets to the customer. All the bad reviews I have read are from bent rails and damaged product. I used the saw at the JLC show and have used Festool and Mafele and the makita is as good if not better and easier on the wallet. I am a cabinet maker and finish carpenter and love this saw.
376080
All three battery sizes work. I prefer the 4.5 amp that I found on amazon not a makita brand but so far it is working great. The 4.5 lasts an hour longer then the 3.0. The combination is a job site must!
584768
No Battery included with any bare tool from any manufacturer. I think the confusion comes because Amazon does NOT identify this as a "bare tool". I believe the "Z" on the end always indicates a bare tool. Does not look like Amazon US sells the kit, leaving this mainly for the use of people that have other Makita LXT tools. Normally the first purchase is always a kit. The original number for the kit was BUC122 and the bare tool was BUC122Z. Looks like the bare tool changed part number.
1378029
CK - I'm not quite sure I understand your concern. In my opinion the Makita plate joiner is quite stable on its large fence/foot and it is well designed ergonomically. In short, it is easy to complete accurately located pockets that cut cleanly in soft or hardwood. One reason I picked the Makita was for its superior fence design. Specifically, it's all die cast aluminum and it is precision milled on each side to ride on tapered "ways" that are machined onto the motor frame. Because of this design the geared fence height adjustment is smooth and accurate with no play or "wobble" due to excessive machining tolerances. The fence cam lock is also easy to use and because of the noted machined design it locks the fence without "camming" or twisting the base or foot (i.e. everything stays square). One knock in reviews is that the "foot" has a rather small opening for sighting your pocket location lines. For myself this has not been an issue. If you haven't already, find a local Makita dealer where you can go and examine the machine's construction, controls and general feel in your hands. Then do the same with the highly rated PC and "yellow" tool offerings. I think you'll be impressed that the Makita is also a quality standout, if not superior. Note that the joiners offered by HD and Sears (same tool under different brands) are very poor seconds. Hope this helps.
2016261
According to the website, its just different packaging. The tool is the same in either case, go with whichever is cheaper
2174937
I will check in the morning when I go to the work site I have the Makita at. I do remember it is very easy to use and the best of many saw I have owned it is pleasure to use and runs so smooth.
1229156
Assuming they haven't made any improvement in the blades, just added more power to the motor, the 1.5 amps in extra current is worth about one-fifth of an extra horsepower over the 13.5 amp model. Seems like a bit much when the price is 40% more for just a 10% increase in power. For what its worth, I own an SJ620 from 4 years back, and love it. Not sure if I would have gone for a more powerful model if it had been available at that time.
2098881
.My saw had no no play in the blade from Makita. How does it cut? Mine cuts 3/4 red oak smooth with little or no chipping. The original blade is great! My previous yellow saw had wobble in hardwood. OK for framing with SPF, but not for working with hardwood. I was told this model had bearing issues.Reading reviews on Amazon led me to buying the Makita. I have tried no other blade.
666417
Just search Amazon - Makita BCL 180ZW - it comes up - on sale now, 5.99 instead of 8.00.
262240
Nothing that I can see. I have the 314w. Makita had a deal when I bought mine and I received a cordless vac for free. Hope this helps.
2281114
My choice has been and is "when I can I go German engineering". I haven't been disappointed with a number of Bosch products. I am, as needed, replacing with Bosch. I am not personally acquainted with the Makita saw.
1430591
I believe it's just an older model number. I haven't found anything with any difference between the two of them.
181231
There is no difference other than color amongst any of the robots, with the exception of the brush and filter on the new XV-21. Per the manufacturer, the only other difference is color. The firmware could also be different, but that can be updated for free.
824642
@IcyWalt - that is baloney. I used my 1980s 1015 (?) - (the first sliding compound Makita came out with) HARD for 30 years. The new ones are made identically - the indents are not going to wear out in 3 years- I don't know what you and your crew were doing - but sounds like it wasn't taking very good care of your tools.
1973707
I would recommend that you visit the Makita website, and learn about the latest models available.