Anyone have a comparison between the MX892 and the MX922? Which is better?
640827
As near as I can tell, they are the same except the 892 has a rear tray that will feed envelopes. The 922 does not have the rear feed, but has a second front tray that only holds small paper like 4x6 for shapshots.
1318793
They fit into my mx922 and have worked just fine. No glitches at all. Very happy with them
141682
The MX860 ADF is definitely full duplex. So was the MX850 and now the MX870.
920011
I use both of those inks but I have a Canon MX922. Don't know if it's compatible.
1118512
>For some low end printers, it's almost cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy replacement cartridges.Exactly, I just bought the MX860 and will test it against HP C7280 (both brand new still in box). Problem is that I can't find third-party toner for the MX860. Those CLI-221 are availible only without chips and I am worried that to some design and patent scheme that will not change. I am guessing that replacing a full set of toner twice will be more than the initial printer cost. For HP I can find descent (according to some reviews) third-party toner. Yet I am guessing the MX860 is a better machine...I'll have some decisions to make. >For some low end printers, it's almost cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy replacement cartridges.Exactly, I just bought the MX860 and will test it against HP C7280 (both brand new still in box). Problem is that I can't find third-party toner for the MX860. Those CLI-221 are availible only without chips and I am worried that to some design and patent scheme that will not change. I am guessing that replacing a full set of toner twice will be more than the initial printer cost. For HP I can find descent (according to some reviews) third-party toner. Yet I am guessing the... » Read More >For some low end printers, it's almost cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy replacement cartridges.Exactly, I just bought the MX860 and will test it against HP C7280 (both brand new still in box). Problem is that I can't find third-party toner for the MX860. Those CLI-221 are availible only without chips and I am worried that to some design and patent scheme that will not change. I am guessing that replacing a full set of toner twice will be more than the initial printer cost. For HP I can find descent (according to some reviews) third-party toner. Yet I am guessing the MX860 is a better machine...I'll have some decisions to make. « Show Less
224039
Great question and one that I would also like to know. If not, then what about the MX850, if you can still find one?
983661
What is the difference between the Zen GB and the Zen MX 8 GB except the price?
561051
You can't really compare the two when one is a ten keyless (quickfire tk) and the other is a full size keyboard (k70). Both are great keyboards.
1787773
I also have the MX922. The replacements contained both the double-wide black 250 and the black 251, 2 of each (plus 2 of the cyan, yellow, magenta). I had to replace the 250. This was my first replacement and it didn't go in quite as easy as my previous Canon, but I think that is the printer itself and nothing to do with the cartridge.
1226432
This link is for the mx700/800 but I think they are similar. Hope this helps! http://www.remotecentral.com/ftp/mx700/documentation/MXEditorManual_v14.pdf
2212728
Not likely. The Canon specs for the MX870 specify the PGI-220BK for the oversized black ink cartridge. The PGI-255XXL is technically compatible with the MX922 and the MX722 only. Even if the cartridge physically fits in the slot, the electrical contacts may not register.
927448
I have an MX712 and they work great, looks like the mx880 takes the same cartridge but double-check for compatability
466044
They are physically the same size, but XL CONTAINS around 2x more ink than non-XL. For the PGI black, there is also an XXL that is about 60% more ink than the XL.Here is Canon's estimated page yeilds for the MX922 printer: http://www.usa.canon.com/CUSA/assets/app/pdf/PrintYield/MX922-page-yield_V1.0.pdfOther printers can be looked up here: http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/standard_display/resources-and-learning-consumer/reference_materials-consumer/Page_YieldHope that helps.
1144692
Assuming you meant MX100, as there is no M100: "The MX100 is Crucial's new mainstream drive, replacing the popular M500 while the M550 will continue to serve the higher performance market. ... The short summary is that the MX100 builds on the same architecture as the M500 and M550. The only fundamental difference is the NAND inside as the controller is the same Marvell 88SS9189 silicon as found inside the M550." - AnandTech's MX100 Review
918518
Guess what? I had the same "debate" in Sam's 2 days ago. I ended up buying the FX820, the difference isn't that much ($20), and I won't have any surprises! I bought one for my daughter on June 12th (HUGE SUCCESS) and ended up getting another one for my son 2 days ago! I'd say go with the FX820! GOOD LUCK!
2046733
Yes, they work in the MX922. Colors are not good, though. So if you plan to print photos, avoid this ink.
2049588
definitely go with flex 2 I'm around 140 and got flex 2 and i wouldnt want the board to be any more flexible than it already is. For you i think the choice is more between flex 1 or flex 2 and if you want the more flexible feel of the 2 i would say flex 2 all the way