How do these compare to the ATH-M50?
650552
i just heard m50 once, i like the a900x more but it depends on what kind of music u listen, the m50 are just increidible for electronic music and bassy things, the a900x are better for more subtle music, his domain are the mids and a really open space, i love them for jazz, academic classic and soul, funky etc...
341485
For sound quality, I would go for the AKGs. To me they have a much flatter and cleaner sound and have excellent mids, which is good for mixing vocals especially. The Audio Technicas are good headphones and have better bass, but the mids are a bit recessed so they aren't the best for mixing vocals. However, my experience with the K240s is that the build quality is very poor and they break very easily. The ATH-M50's have much better build quality, so that's another thing to consider. It doesn't matter how good your headphones sound when they're broken. One last thing is that the AKG's are open backed headphones whereas the Audio Technicas are closed back. So if you want to avoid feedback during live recording, the Audio Technicas are the clear choice. I hope this information helps.
1255504
Depends on what you want. I like my pro500mk2 but i believe they have better lows. If you want highs go with the m50's if you want bass go with the pro500mk2's
1896206
Yes, but not well - they are slightly smaller than the ATH M50 pads, and consequently my ear feels slightly cramped when wearing the phones. There is also less depth - the ear is pressing up on the grill more. Overall, I don't recommend these for the M50.
1934369
I switched quickly to the PLT_M50, which does not have the problems I described in the M20 and I have small ears :)
1379893
I have the m50s limited edition. I prefer the hm5 better just because it's more neutral sounding. M50s is abit v shape to me, where you can hear the high and bass really well but the mid abit laid back. I also think the hm5 have better soundstage. However do note you will need about 100 hours of burning time for the hm5 to get it settled and the sound will change through out the burning process. The other thing I like about the hm5 that it is quite easy to mod. Mine has a cable upgrade and a wood cup now. However if u looking for option should check out Beyer and akg as they also have good stuffs as well just not in the price range of hm5.
2064020
I tried both and took the M50 home with me. Half the price and a much more accurate sound profile. I don't really listen to rap but I do lot of everything else, more comfortable than the AKG K701 I owned previously too.
763779
The earpads have been improved on the new model, however, we do offer inexpensive Velvet earpads here: http://www.amazon.com/ATH-M50-PADS-Velvet-pads-ATH-M50-headphones/dp/B00GTR2ICQ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1392906746&sr=8-2&keywords=m50+velvet+earpads
1825386
The sound quality on this one is much better than the m55. I like it because no matter where I'm at it still has a large range and sound is awesome on both ends! Very affordable for such a nice product! Hope that helps.....
423312
Unlike the M50 headphones, this model has been completely redesigned. The new structure, new drivers, and a totally different sound. Overall, the sound quality is much better, and more accurate.
845511
They both have their advantages these 440's will do great and built like a truck. They will last a very long time and is something happens to the cable or ear pads you can easily replace them. When comparing the ath-50's to the shure 440 I believe the ath-50's have a better sound stage and will last a good while. I chose the 440's because they were cheap and had replaceable parts. So decide what your like more better sound with a little price bump or good sound with hey better feeling that you can replace items if anything ever happens. If you have the money go for the shure 840' a lot better sound and great build quality, you will not regret it. Sorry for the long rant but I hope I was able to help.
1453225
Blow them out of the water in every regard IMO, less bass in these though (not an issue for me as I would rather controlled bass than more bass) also depending on what you are used to they are relatively bright as far as lower mid range headphones go. They are unweildy to take out in public if you aren't using them at home though (the M50's do a good job outside) I would recommend going for the A900X's over the A700X's if you can afford the difference though, the Aluminum housing makes a rather large difference imo.
882699
l do not own the M50s... so l can´t answer your question... However, common sense tells me the PRO700MK2 should isolate better from the outside as they appear to exert a tighter pressure on your head than the M50 does. Also, take into account that the PRO700s are DJs HPs so l guess they must have been designed to provide more isolation than the M50s... Your choice!
2088574
I own both the XS and the M50. Personally I use the XS for travel and the M50 at home. They both have a great sound but the M50 is flat and doesn't add anything to the music (which is good for mixing and recording). But the XS adds a warm signature to the music, it also boosts the bass a bit too. The M50 is bigger and may take up more space in a bag, and the XS is really tiny. The XS on the head is pretty comfortable, but after wearing it for an hour it gets a little sore on my ears (but after an hour it is understandable). The M50 however, makes the top of my head hurt after around 30-45 minutes, and I have to take it off due to the pain. It's really weird but I think the cushion placement in the headband is a little flawed. They are both outstanding headphones, up to you if you don't mind a bigger fit or a smaller conforming fit.
341484
I can't comment on the ATH-M50, as I haven't used one yet. The AKG 240 however is a very good set, but I wouldn't use headphones to mix final masters. Especially not when you have to listen to screaming guitars. For tracking vocals you should be carefull as a sensitive mic would "listen" to the headphones too. Not always welcome when recording soft passages. Hope this helps
1337668
I actually think the M4s are much better from a sound quality perspective. They have great reproduction. I have owned Bose and senheiser noise canceling phones and I would pick the M4s over them.
27254
I've compared them and they sound similar. The HP50 has better deep sub bass extension, but the PSB M4U1 has a smoother sounding midrange. Treble is shinier on the HP50 and softer on the M4U1. I'd say it's a tossup. Both headphones sound terrific, but look geeky for wearing out and about. The HP50 has just about the oddest looking headband ever, and the PSBs are just big and bulky.