What's the deference between the Tamrac 7X and the 9X?
619965
The main difference is the size, the 7x is big but the 9x is huge; also another difference is the laptop compartment 9x doesn't have one; strongly recommend to go to Tamrac's site and review both bags. I have the 7X and it is really heavy when fully loaded, personally I wouldn't recommend the 9x unless you need to pack really big lenses.
619966
It's been a while since I bought my and I love it. Very comfortable to wear. I choose the 7x because it was at the maximum size the you can bring on a plane as a carry on. The 9x is bigger for the really long lenses. I believe the 9x does not have the extra pocket for a laptop which I use for grey cards, iPad and stuff like that. As for that they have the same pockets but but larger sizes. You'll be surprised of how much you can get in the 7x and how heavy it will be and still easy on the back. Hope this helps.
839013
I have both cameras, and while the Z915 exterior seems a little cheaper to the eye, the Z950 actually creaks a little bit when you press on the top cover buttons. So far, both cameras have performed well and seem rugged enough for normal use. The pictures from both are very good, but not excellent. If Kodak could combine the good points of both cameras they would really have a winner. As it is, they have two rather mediocre but decent and servicable cameras.
937044
Performance wise, there is no noticeable difference. The SX910 has a 5 yr warranty vs the SX900's 3 yr which is due to them "cherry picking" or "binning" the best NAND chips for the 910.
1024338
The most important difference is the lense 34X. The rest, both cameras are fine. Ral
1526808
Have not tried the tamron the cannon 24-70 2.8L II . Is a a purchase I'll never regret. It holds up against my friends zeiss primes plus blazing fast auto focus
1312762
This one appears to be the 9cm version, which I have been using on my Cannonade for over a year. It has worked great for me, but I imagine the 7cm one would be a little more secure and stable. The mount is very strong. I highly recommend it!
812710
Not that I can find with a quick googling. Of course, I cannot find such specific conditions of review for others either. 9x32 is a pretty rare power. Clarity is not too specific, but I assume you could break it into contrast and sharpness, both pretty good for the money here. If you are seriously into scouting game you probably want something a bit better, though. Zen-Ray 8x42, Vortex Solo 8x36 , something like that. The main issue with this is the tight focuser ring. Contrast is very good, sharpness good. (better than the BG binoculars). I'd back off to 7x or 8x for scouting and spend a bit more.
1276205
The IQ of the Tamron lens is typical of super-zooms, that is, a compromise at all focal lengths. The Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85 is generally well-regarded and is probably sharper over much or all of its range. I would recommend adding the Tamron to your kit for its unbeatable versatility but keep the Nikkor for its better optics.
2058087
The Tamron lens is faster so may be better in low light situations and stopping fast action sports. It is only 1 full stop faster so this may not make much difference except in certain situations. However I'm pretty sure that Tamron does NOT make this lens with a Pentax mount so if you have a Pentax camera it won't work. The sharpness and overall quality of the Pentax lens is considerably better than the Tamron. That's why it costs nearly twice as much. I recommend that you read Bryan Peterson's book Understanding Exposure to help you with many photography questions. Hope this helps
270092
The 991 has a much more full sound. Both are great condensor mikes, but also have a very high SPL tolerance. I'm happy with my purchase.
1360378
Sorry...wish I could help you, Gene, but I have not used anything but the 9. Works great for me!
1533865
Tamron pros: light, sharp, f 2,8 inexpensive cons: only for crop sensors, autofocus motor a little loud when searching for focus(has not bother me) Canon Pros; EF for full and crop sensor, sharp, Cons; F4, shorter zoom, more expensive, heavier. I would recommend reading the reviews at the digital picture. Note, the VC version of the Tamron is not as sharp as the non-VC It comes down to this, if you are going to stay with crop sensor, get the tamron
542765
I own both. A99 has a lot better low light performance c/w a77. Now a77 m2 is slightly better then a 77 but still does not c/w a99. The lenses you use with a77 may not be able to be used with a99 ( will fit the mount but you will only get a cropped picture ) so make sure that the lenses you have are also good for full frame and not just APS-C . A77m 2 on the other hand is better for sports as has better focus tracking and faster pictures / second rate.
96278
My best guess would be 7x. There are no markings so I can't be sure. It's very good magnification, but if you're really concerned you'd have to contact Conair.
1890471
Find the Tamron site and ask them. Sorry, would love to help, but I have no idea.
1693258
I could never tell the difference from product descriptions and even an online chat session with a CS rep. I ended up buying the 895 since it was a but less expensive than the 870 and it has a charging station and travel case that the 870 doesn't have. I have been happy with it so far.
1471025
www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/.../dx-vs-fx-its-not-debate-its-choiceThis will help you