I am a perfect size 33''. Should I go to a 32'' or a 34''? If I went with a 32'', would there be room in the waist if I needed it?
82505
I am also have a 33" waist, fairly thin (cyclist) build. I ordered the 32 and it was way too tight around the hips. The fabric stretches, so you could wear them, but I did not feel that they would be appropriate to wear to the gym due to the extra bulge in front. I returned and ordered the 34. A little big, but a much better fit around the hips. The drawstring keeps them from slipping down at the waist.
82506
I bought these for my husband. He is a perfect size 31. I bought him a 30. His was a bit worried the first time he put them on but wears them all the time for Crossfit and Casually. So I'm guessing the size worked out great, otherwise they'd be folded away somewhere. The sizing recommends going down if your between sizes. It worked for him!
82507
They are pretty true to size. I would order a 33". They have a draw string to make them tighter. I purchased a 38" and have recently dropped one waist size to a 36", I'm still able to wear them and make them tighter. These shorts are really comfortable.
633314
My waist is between 32 and 33. M fits but is a bit loose so I need to tighten up the belt. Surprisingly, S fits me too and also need to tighten the belt a little. So I don't know. Also, I notice the leg on the M is a bit baggy than the S. So I chose the S.
268006
I'm a 32" waist and the 36-38" fits just fine, so I'd recommend going up to the next size.
2018151
I'm a 36 waist too and this is rather snug. It's bearable, but only for an hour or two until my back begins to hurt, so you may want to go a size up, depending on your intended use.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
1062400
I would go with the waist measurement. But to be sure call the company and ask them then you can also ask about returning it if it does not fit.
1754
I am 6'4" 232 lbs with where a 34 pant and I got an XL and they fit great. I would say you should probably go M or L. It would probably depend if you are most concerned with waist or size or leg length. They stretch pretty well so I would say go with what fits your legs best.
161452
Go with the medium/54cm. I'm 6' tall with a 32" inseam and the 54 is just right.
994195
I would recommend going up to a 34. The waist band has a 3 inch elastic on each side of the pants which allows the pants to fit a little tighter yet still provide comfort. Also the pants comes with a twill belt if it is too loose.
624826
I am a 34 -36 and ordered the Large. would accommodate 34 perfectly! Great pants. I love mine.
1799882
I'm 5'10" and a 32" waistline and I got a medium, they fit great. So I would say a medium would work for you also.
1101253
I'm pretty sure a s/m should fit a 34" waist, I bought the l/xl with a 38 inch waist and I think it would go as small as a 36 inch. But that would be pushing it,any smaller and it would not be tight enough for support. I hope I was able to help, but it's really hard to tell without actually trying the belt on.
866651
Hey Steve - I'm a 33 waist and I bought a large. They fit tight, but they are supposed to. You just have to get used to wearing a second set of skin - HA! I love mine.
1747399
I'm 6'3 180lbs and have a 33-34 waist. I get the size large/ long length in these pants and they fit great! I would think a size medium or large waist with the regular length should be a good fit for you. Hope this info helps
614301
I would go with a 32 if you want it tighter and it'll stretch put the more you wear it or a 34. There's not a huge difference between the two, I wear a 6 and got a 34 because I like mine a little smaller so it's less drag when I swim competitively.
365477
I think my 34 x 36 pair fit about right in the waist and quite a bit longer. But, long is good when you have trouble finding tall sizes.
339533
There should be a waist size chart on the box itself. But 32-33 would most likely be a medium-sized. If you have doubts go to a sporting goods store look at their boxes for sizing and use that guide. But I would still get the shock dr. Over other protective gear.