Is the AC1450 better than the AC1750?
636752
Not at all. Going into details - there're 2 versions R6300 - R6300 & R6300v2. The first's with 600 mhz cpu and USB 2.0. R2 with 800 Mhz dual core cpu and USB 3.0. In contrast, AC1450 has nice smaller size. The same 800 mhz cpu and USB 3.0. Yes, 802.11AC is 975 mbps vs 1300 mbps overall in R6300. But this feature almost means nothing at the present stage. Like that... :)
784693
I have both so I show how both compare in a video I uploaded, hope this helps eveyone: http://www.amazon.com/review/R3H93U55IRPTZ4
339180
I am afraid that I can not answer that question. I guess look at the spec sheets on the two units and compare them.
2016263
I have no idea, but i would definitely go with the 53100 since it's like 2 bucks cheaper.
674062
The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted towards retail consumers, while the SB6180 is targeted towards businesses or OEM use. The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted... » Read More The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted towards retail consumers, while the SB6180 is targeted towards businesses or OEM use. « Show Less
611296
I replaced a latest gen Airport Express in the hopes of better wifi coverage (still N), but I don't notice any appreciable difference. I'm keeping the unit, mainly in future proofing for new idevices with the AC protocol.
1751615
No. Unfortunately it cannot. But I don't have the ac1750. I have the ac1200. It's cylindrical not square like the picture shown above the question
1797350
I don't have either, but from a direct look at the specs, there's a few differences. The AC600 is USB 2, while the AC1200 is USB 3. USB 3 supports much higher data rates and is probably needed to maximize the full network bandwidth potential of a solid 802.11 AC router. The AC1200 spec sheet also has a line about supporting "both 802.11 AC and 802.11 N", and the AC 600 doesn't have that line, so I'm guessing the AC1200 has dual-radios and can support a wider variety of configurations.
1436663
Check out the differences between the 1513 and the 1512 and consider if they are worth the extra $100 to you or not. Me personally, I always try to get the latest model when it's not a bank breaker. To be honest though, 2GB of RAM and 4 ethernet ports are not that much of an upgrade. I purchased the additional 1GB of RAM for my 1512 to bump it up to 2GB, think I picked it up here on Amazon for around $30. I highly recommend getting the extra memory for the 1512 if you go that route. Here is a link on some folks talking about the differences of the 1512 and the 1513: http://forum.synology.com/enu/viewtopic.php?f=200&t;=66881&start;=75 Check out the differences between the 1513 and the 1512 and consider if they are worth the extra $100 to you or not. Me personally, I always try to get the latest model when it's not a bank breaker. To be honest though, 2GB of RAM and 4 ethernet ports are not that much of an upgrade. I purchased the additional 1GB of RAM for my 1512 to bump it up to 2GB, think I picked it up here on Amazon for around $30. I highly recommend getting the extra memory for the 1512 if you go that route. Here is a link on some folks talking about the differences of the 1512 and the 1513:... » Read More Check out the differences between the 1513 and the 1512 and consider if they are worth the extra $100 to you or not. Me personally, I always try to get the latest model when it's not a bank breaker. To be honest though, 2GB of RAM and 4 ethernet ports are not that much of an upgrade. I purchased the additional 1GB of RAM for my 1512 to bump it up to 2GB, think I picked it up here on Amazon for around $30. I highly recommend getting the extra memory for the 1512 if you go that route. Here is a link on some folks talking about the differences of the 1512 and the 1513: http://forum.synology.com/enu/viewtopic.php?f=200&t;=66881&start;=75 « Show Less
346962
The 670 is slightly more powerful then the 760. But the 670 is $150 more. I'd be nore inclined to compare 670 vs 770 as they r in the same price range and the 770 is more powerful then the 670
1074349
Thanks for your question. The 7050 offers more networking, streaming and wireless conectivity. This is a fantastic sounding amplifier. World Wide Stereo is 35 years old and a very proud NAD dealer.
1202986
The closest I could find on the benchmark site I use most often shows a Radeon HD 5750 benchmarks at 1394 and the HD 6850 almost 1K higher rated at 2237 and every thing else should be fine with your PC. There are *always* faster, more expensive cards; but I am pleased with my two purchases!
93450
It looks like the A550 is the best compromise for you since all you get in the 650 are extras you're not interested in. Go for it.
1601767
The AC100 is a little smaller in size is the only real difference. I went with the AWS-100 because the cover is hinged on rather than just placed over it. The weigh surface on these things is very sensitive and might get banged around while putting the cover on the AC100. The cover locks on the AWS-100 and stays closed. I am not sure how well the cover stays closed on the AC100.
2040268
The AC66 is incompatible with haswell (the latest intel architecture) but the AC68 is fine. I have had both and both give significant speed and signal boosts (if you have an AC router). Get the AC68 as it is backwards compatible with everything.
1339501
I think there is no difference. It depends on the price. You will be able to choose better one for you. Good luck.
1981094
I bet the Arcam doesn't sound ten times better (than the PAR21) and a couple of those reviews reveal some behavior I wouldn't tolerate on a high powered audio system. A quality audio cable will usually deliver the best sound but lacks the bluetooth convenience.