If this isn't the lens to use in low light and indoors forsports then what lens is?
650325
This lense works great for action outdoors with a lot of light. We use fixed 1.8 for indoors
509386
I am not quite sure what you mean. Can you clarify your question? Do you mean to ask if this is a good lens for low light conditions?
1337317
No. It's a 20mm prime (fixed) which gives you a wider field of view and the f/1.7 means it's pretty fast. I like this lens for indoors without having to use a flash.
1028371
This is a great lens, but sports is not really it's thing. Out it might do alright. Sigma has always been the winner for sports, either the 50-150 2.8 or the 70-200 2.8. Don't just take my word for it. Look at the Pentax forums website under the tab lens database. Real helpful reviews.
346746
F1.4 is a fast lens that's great at night or dark spaces. Good for capturing fast motion, very sharp. But my main reason was low lit area because I don't need flash.
2256203
I don't use it for that but I see professional photographers using it when I watch events on TV. As the other commenter, waverider, stated, the lens struggles as light diminishes. That's why the majority of sports photographers use fix focal length lenses because they have fewer glass elements allowing for more light. The lens you are considering, 100-400, is my go-to lens. That was an unexpected surprise. My brilliant 70-200 stays in the bag. The 100-400 even takes fantastic flower shots from a near distance. They pop!
224454
this camera is GREAT for any and everything!! i've taken some great sports pictures with the lens it came with, but i'm sure it would be even better with a special lens. also, it really depends on the amount of light; if there's lots of light, no problem!! it's trickier the less light there is. the camera is amazing. i couldn't be happier with it in any way!! good luck!!
91515
This lens is great for low light situations especially without fast motion as the autofocus isn't as fast as the Nikon/Canon version. The f2.8 will be great for indoor/poor lit situations!
873514
I have had no experience indoors. I use it for real estate pictures, outside. Its a great little lens for my work.
547719
This is a lens for outdoors in good light. It won't work in low light. Get a lens with a lot f stop to do low light photography. Eg 20mm 1.7f
736776
I do not own this lens anymore do to the fact that I started shooting indoor events. I loved the lens but with a 4 aperture it doesn't take in enough light. I would recommend the 2.8 version of this lens or a prime lens for your needs. You will be able to keep your shutter speeds up and ISP down.
2000653
You'll probably want a lense with a wider aperture to let in more light. Something lower than F/5.6. You can get away with it if you set your ISO high enough, but if you're trying to snag indoors and zoomed, an F/2.8 lens is really going to make for much better pictures. I've used the 100-400M F5.6 indoors and it works, but you have to be willing to use the ISO set high and accept slower shutter speeds. The dream lens that is the absolute best IMHO is the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM. The F2.8 is great for indoors, it features image stabilization so you can free hand it really well and the focus and clarity is amazing. It's expensive, but it's amazing what it can do. You'll probably want a lense with a wider aperture to let in more light. Something lower than F/5.6. You can get away with it if you set your ISO high enough, but if you're trying to snag indoors and zoomed, an F/2.8 lens is really going to make for much better pictures. I've used the 100-400M F5.6 indoors and it works, but you have to be willing to use the ISO set high and accept slower shutter speeds. The dream lens that is the absolute best IMHO is the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM. The F2.8 is great for indoors, it features image stabilization so you can free hand it really well and the... » Read More You'll probably want a lense with a wider aperture to let in more light. Something lower than F/5.6. You can get away with it if you set your ISO high enough, but if you're trying to snag indoors and zoomed, an F/2.8 lens is really going to make for much better pictures. I've used the 100-400M F5.6 indoors and it works, but you have to be willing to use the ISO set high and accept slower shutter speeds. The dream lens that is the absolute best IMHO is the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM. The F2.8 is great for indoors, it features image stabilization so you can free hand it really well and the focus and clarity is amazing. It's expensive, but it's amazing what it can do. « Show Less
1858499
Yeah buying a zoom lens for indoor low light shooting is where photography starts to become expensive. Canon's 70-200 f2.8L is over a thousand dollars, so depending on how far away from the subject you are, I'd suggest a prime lens at any one of several focal lengths offered at apertures of f1.4, f1.8, or f2.8. I've personally had great success using the 50mm f1.8, but since you're asking about telephoto zoom lenses, it seems you might need a little more reach. The Canon 200mm f2.8L lists for $750, and the 100mm f2 is about $400, and that's about the same price as the 85mm f1.8. So it depends on your needs pretty much.
521136
Yes it is a good lense. I have the 35mm as we'll. if you are going to be taking more picture inside than out, I would go with the 35mm. If more outside then the 50mm. Both do an excellent job.
626722
It's a very good low light lens, however if you use a F/2.8 aperture be very careful with your depth of field. Depth of field is very shallow with that large aperture. Stop it down to f/4 or more if possible.
2058092
I am using this lens primarily for sports - synchronized swimming. So far only outdoors (wish you would ask it a few months out -the indoor meet is coming up then). It is a beautiful lens for landscaping or nature shots, but so far i cannot say i am 100% satisfied with it for sports. Based on what i see, i can imagine it might be problematic with low-light conditions and sports as even outdoors it still hunts that focus point. But off course reflections can be the cause, at least for me. It probably as good as we can go at this price point, but definitely do not expect flawless photos. As to comparing it against Tamron - sorry, no experience there. I am using this lens primarily for sports - synchronized swimming. So far only outdoors (wish you would ask it a few months out -the indoor meet is coming up then). It is a beautiful lens for landscaping or nature shots, but so far i cannot say i am 100% satisfied with it for sports. Based on what i see, i can imagine it might be problematic with low-light conditions and sports as even outdoors it still hunts that focus point. But off course reflections can be the cause, at least for me. It probably as good as we can go at this price point, but definitely do not expect flawless photos. As... » Read More I am using this lens primarily for sports - synchronized swimming. So far only outdoors (wish you would ask it a few months out -the indoor meet is coming up then). It is a beautiful lens for landscaping or nature shots, but so far i cannot say i am 100% satisfied with it for sports. Based on what i see, i can imagine it might be problematic with low-light conditions and sports as even outdoors it still hunts that focus point. But off course reflections can be the cause, at least for me. It probably as good as we can go at this price point, but definitely do not expect flawless photos. As to comparing it against Tamron - sorry, no experience there. « Show Less
1507361
You don't like zoom and you want more bokeh. I would recommend spending money on better glass, instead of on a new body. I would recommend either the SEL50F18 or the SEL35F18. The 50mm is considerably cheaper, but the focal length might be too long for indoor shooting. I have the SEL35F18 and absolutely love the lens and the resulting shots.