Is it really that much better than the ss weber grill?
647811
Honestly I don't know. I do know it is truly a quality grate. You do need the special tool (from them) to pick-up one side of the grate at a time, and you also need to learn where to place the tool to properly and easily pick-up the one side to add coals etc. correctly. I had to call the company to learn how. They are a small company and gave me very good customer service when I called. I love it, but I haven't barbequed on it yet! Sorry. Wish I could be more help.
647812
It really is that much better. Adding this is like having a new grill. The grates are thicker, conduct heat more evenly and efficiently and can also add those professional grill marks on your food, like a real grill. Believe me, I also questioned purchasing grates that cost twice the amount of the grill...but I've never regretted this purchase once.
647813
The differance is night and day, think about it, cast iron like a resaurant steak house or wire to cook on?, the wire is a throw away, warps with use and cant get clean and the cast iron will last forever, You can not sere on wire
647814
the difference is clear .. if you want the grill marks from the competition cast iron is the answer, but if you do indirect or l & s can do without! for me is irreplaceable .. andrea
647815
Yes, if you like a more consistent temperature for your food during longer barbecues. But, if you're only into fast grilling burgers and the odd sausage maybe this isn't the item for you. Cast Iron need preparing (seasoning) to become the non-stick, temperature retaining grate you want under your Rib-Eye steak for those killer searing and grillmarks over direct heat for the first two minutes and to barbecue the steak over medium heat for the second stage to perfect it. If you're into more than a burger and sausage, it's worth the investment. I know I haven't regret my purchase nearly two years ago... Yes, if you like a more consistent temperature for your food during longer barbecues. But, if you're only into fast grilling burgers and the odd sausage maybe this isn't the item for you. Cast Iron need preparing (seasoning) to become the non-stick, temperature retaining grate you want under your Rib-Eye steak for those killer searing and grillmarks over direct heat for the first two minutes and to barbecue the steak over medium heat for the second stage to perfect it. If you're into more than a burger and sausage, it's worth the investment. I know I haven't regret my purchase nearly two... » Read More Yes, if you like a more consistent temperature for your food during longer barbecues. But, if you're only into fast grilling burgers and the odd sausage maybe this isn't the item for you. Cast Iron need preparing (seasoning) to become the non-stick, temperature retaining grate you want under your Rib-Eye steak for those killer searing and grillmarks over direct heat for the first two minutes and to barbecue the steak over medium heat for the second stage to perfect it. If you're into more than a burger and sausage, it's worth the investment. I know I haven't regret my purchase nearly two years ago... « Show Less
467019
Not too well. The coating on it is nothing like the quality of a weber product. Neither is the steel for that mater
211065
If I remember right this grill has a different set up than the Weber. So I say no. But I am old and forget things
493453
I've been told that there is better heat distribution with the thicker metal. Hope that helps :)
765146
For years I used the Weber cover and it was always a very tight fit and therefore very difficult to put on and take off. The Glorious Montana cover is a little larger which makes it much easier. It is also more flexible than the Weber cover and is about the same thickness. I definitely recommend this cover, especially since it is less expensive.
1524617
I am not sure. But let me tell you this: Weber , never again. I had to throw mine away after 3 years. The worst experience ever with Weber. 20 years ago yes that was quality. Now stainless steal???? Corrosion all over after 2 years. Weber did not respond at all to my complaints. Never again. Good luck
1748267
It would be easier to go to broilkingbbq.com and compare the 2 grills. The XL has more features.
684362
Sorry, don't know the answer to this. However, had to throw this grill out within a month or two of buying it. Over-flamed and burnt out the grilling component. Have since purchased the Weber portable. Its twice the price but 4 times better. Far more sturdy (and heavier). Grills beautifully and is still going strong more than 8 months later. As they say, you get what you pay for.
888431
I was also impressed with the Weber Genesis and would recommend it. I can't compare to your charcoal experience since I was never very good at using a charcoal grill and prefer gas.
313214
It is the same from what I checked out. I looked at grill at Bass Pro and bought this one. Don't see any difference other than name. A great grill to use also.
688831
I am assuming you're referring to the Lodge Sportsman charcoal Grill which is a terrific piece of equipment. I also have the Smoky Joe and use that a lot too. This is a difficult question to answer because they're pretty neck and neck when it comes to quality, ease-of-use, and final product. The Smoky Joe has a cover the Lodge Grill doesn't. How important is that to you? I like the cast-iron grate on the Lodge better than the chrome grate on the Weber but that's something you have to decide for yourself also. They both hold about the same number of burgers, hotdogs, etc. even though the lodge grill is a little larger. And because it's cast-iron it's going to be very heavy-a little over 30 pounds. The Lodge does an excellent job with steaks and hamburgers and actually now that I think about it does a better job than the Weber for those two because the cast iron heats up better than the Weber . The cast iron grill will last a lifetime if you take care of it. You can't do long slow cooking on the Lodge because it has no cover so you have to ask yourself what you do the most of-quick steaks, chops, burgers etc. or roasts and ribs. guess if the cover is not that important to you then I would definitely go with the Lodge grill even though it's more expensive. Weber and Lodge both make great products ...you can't go wrong with either one of them.
1902306
The non stick grill is better, lighter than the stone top, easier to clean, great to cook meat.
1517123
It is. Weber makes charcoal grills that vary about 4 inches apart in diameter. Most people just don't mention/ or know about the fraction of an inch, which really hardly matters. If U can get over the $300 price tag, it truly is a very solid and functional grill. A Thanksgiving turkey done on the Weber is unbelievably easy, and delicious, while freeing up the oven for the all important desserts!
1881144
I have BOTH grills. the other grill is a little bit bigger and there are cosmetic differences. thats about it.
252050
No. It is more like a barbeque grill where the heat is constant. It's advantage over a barbeque grill is that the heating element provides a constant level of heat throughout the cooking process, whereas with a barbeque grill the heat could vary depending on the cook time and the amount of charcoal used.
663871
The grill is the only place I've used it & it works great! The cast iron provides excellent even heating. I make sliders in frequently. Placing sauteed onions on the bottom, plus whatever grease generated by the burgers insures easy removal.
141588
No, this is the version without the starting "gadget" that tends to fail. In my opinion this is the better model as you save $50 for a gadget that tends to fail. There are plenty of other options on the market that assist in starting charcoal that you can get for far less than $50 to go along with this grill.