Makerbot says that layer resolution can be brought down to 20 microns with some tweaking. Has anybody tried that?
1145257
I have printed at 50 and 20 micron. It works but it requires that you have the bed leveled perfectly, some high quality filament, and generally the temperature turned down as low as possible. Aside from the tweaking required, it will also take forever to slice and forever^2 to print.
1690353
I think you can print 16x20 safely and go up to 24x36 with lesser resolution. For more info go to http://www.flickr.com/groups/froknowsphoto/discuss/72157629722925726/
229578
Yes, though I think the .5 to 2.5 micron range is only for the pro version. For mine, small particles are 1-5 microns, large is > 5.
1913852
I am using 100 microns for the same thing and am looking for one with large holes, this one is too slow, I think 75 microns will be too slow also.
2094202
There have been discussions ad nauseam about the true nature of the pixel count. Sorry, I don't even want to set started, there has been so much vitriol on the web about the subject. The raw of a DP3 is about 50MB. SPP, the conversion/editing program provided by Sigma is very, very slow.
962380
What's important to me, is that the sensor is only 5 mp. For what it's worth the max 2D resulting JPG file is 6,016 x 3,384 = 20.4mp.
448321
I am sorry I can't help with that question . My camera is 1100d if that helps but think not.
1546166
thank you for the questionactually I returned it back as it didnt match my requirements using it in big room, regarding resolution and illumination (lumins units)wish to help you more :)
1892399
you have got to be very careful because you are cutting something that if is not cut properly will not work, I myself would use the part that was cut from the full size sim to make the microsim to cut it to the nano size. a small piece of tape will hold the sim in place while it is being cut to the smaller size, you might want to have an extra sim to practice on before you cutthe one you will be using
1036750
Yes, it works just fine with MC, though i would not try higher resolution texturepacks, stick with 16, or 32
547994
Hi Cliff,Hard to say. If you scan the image at 3200 DPI and blow it up to 24 x 36 you will lose allot of resolutions. The People you should ask is Plustek at (714) 670-7713. They will be open on Monday after 9 AM PST.
2185092
The highest "pixels" per inch you can set your image to be seems to be 460. I don't know how that effects printed output. I don't have a good enough printer to test it, sorry. Hope this helps.
2110661
Matt, thanks for posting this. I had the same question and couldn't find an answer. Is it possible that the latency the reviewer perceived is due to upconverting the signal to 1080i, and you are simply converting the analogue to digital signal without changing the resolution? I'm not clear on whether converting implies *up*converting, couldn't really find an answer... but based on your feedback I think I'll give this a shot.
1413101
Unfortunately no, it's twice the W as it capable to convert. You'll just burn it if you use it. Are you going to EU with blender?
328766
Im running 1920x1200 at 60hz on the Generic PNP drivers running Win 7 64bit. Honestly I never even checked on what driver I was running until now. It works flawlesly. Has since the day Win7 came out and I installed it. Before actually when I was running Win7RC.
2045509
Although I've not tried it, I have noticed that you can set a custom paper size in Printing Preferences of the iP8720 (with Windows 7). I know that on my Mac, in Pages, I can set a custom paper size as well, but once again I've not tried it on the Mac either.
34034
I'm not real sure but when I upgraded to a 64 bit computer I had to buy a new Photoshop because my original was a 32. Check out the other answers and also where you bought your program