Why the CA Prop 65 warning for this product?
1139464
I don't know the answer regarding CA Prop 65 but I do know this is the worst protein powder I have ever used. I have tried to use it since it wasn't cheap but the chalky taste is just TERRIBLE.
1139465
Prop. 65 is a CA State initiative. It does not necessarily mean it is harmful or carcinogenic. Call the manufacturer for more info.Here is an useful link on this Prop.: http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/p65faq.html
1139466
It's because California requires that anything that has any trace of lead be labeled accordingly....no matter how minute the amount. Even though fruits and vegetables have traces of lead... they are not required to be labeled.
1139467
Prop. 65 is a CA State initiative. It does not necessarily mean it is harmful or carcinogenic. Call the manufacturer for more info. Here is an useful link on this Prop.: http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/p65faq.html
1793525
Mine were not labeled with a sticker. I do not live in California. First thing I did was to wax mine when they were assembled. I would suspect that a person could paint them with a clear acrylic coating if there was concern about the finish. This is what I found on the subject: What Is Proposition 65? In 1986, California voters approved an initiative to address their growing concerns about exposure to toxic chemicals. That initiative became the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, better known by its original name of Proposition 65. Proposition 65 requires the State to publish a list of chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. This list, which must be updated at least once a year, has grown to include approximately 800 chemicals since it was first published in 1987. http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/background/p65plain.html
322391
Because this product contains chemicals that are banned in the state of California. Also, you live in a nanny state.
1987666
Presumably you purchased a California-bound product. Prop 65 is a unique California statute that requires warning for trace amounts of various chemicals. Some of these are naturally-occurring. For details, I would suggest going to the product website - at this link http://www.genesispureteampritchard.com/uploads/2/4/9/1/24915939/faq.pdf and scrolling down to their explanation on Prop 65. I have no independent knowledge about this product, but I presume this is the issue.
1165600
I never used it! I returned after the packing slip stated that according to proposition 65, they had to tell me this product will give me cancer and this notice only goes to CA residents in the USA
928834
All the information I've been able to find on Proposition 65 is pretty vague. It it supposed to warn consumers of "chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm" As far as I can tell, there is no thought given to the amount of these chemicals - some of which you can't escape in the manufacturing process. More info can be found here: http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/p65faq.html Although the most helpful line from the faq seems to be: "To request more information regarding the chemical exposures that are the basis of the warning, contact the manufacturer of the product." If I had to guess what chemical warranted the proposition 65 warning, I would guess cadmium.
1285753
Any news or clarification on the Prop 65 warning? How can it be clarified if the manufacturer doesn't know why the warning has been marked on their product? I want to purchase this machine, but hesitate until this issue is cleared up.
462585
Well, I'm not a doctor, but I'm guessing that the tag makes reference to the fill material, which is little polystyrene (Styrofoam) pellets. I imagine that as long as no one EATS the pellets, there will be no danger. Incidentally, if you look around your house, you'll probably be able to find several products that California warns against for various reasons; including such warnings is a legal requirement in order to sell products in the state of California. In short, it's nothing to worry about.
1449073
There is no lead in this product. Any prop 65 warnings you see are because the state in which the product is made has laws concerning notices about lead. You might notice it on buildings in states like CA, as well. The product is lead-free. The state is over-zealous on labeling.
2280368
In California, according to Proposition 65, anything that contains ANY substances known as a possible carcinogen must be labelled. That includes all kinds of compounds, including anything with lead in them. Basically, nearly every new piece of electronics, new cars, really just about everything gets the label slapped on to it. A well intentioned law and a bit alarming regarding the prevalence of carcinogens, but it is extremely common for products to have that label and doesn't really have much meaning.
1792579
I have never heard of a Proposition 65 warning before. I have looked it up online and I now know what it is. I was not aware Amazon had a Proposition 65 warning on this product. However, for more product information visit www.nowfoods.com/2810.
2049987
Doesn't everything? Can't imagine why...maybe pregnant women shouldn't eat it?? I'm looking at the package right now and there's no mention of CA Prop 65. The only warnings are, "may scratch some surfaces", "not for aquarium use", and interestingly enough, "due to the nature of this item, some rusting may occur" - hmmm.
480726
That reply doesn't make sense at all! The warning has nothing to do with conforming to regulations -- it is about containing harmful chemicals....I'm guessing that rep has no clue what the prop 65 warning is.I submitted a question on their site too, so I will post again if I get a different response.Thanks for the reply!
126247
on label,"warning: this product contains chemical(s) known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defect or other reproductive harm", but I don't know if it's safe for the sofa!
1910487
I'm sorry, but as I do not live in California, I have no idea why the CA Prop 65 warning is attached. I don't even know what it is.
1692488
That's probably based on California's Prop 65 act which requires labeling for 600 plus elements that they have on their carcinogen list. If you use these in the manner in which they are supposed to be used, I cannot imagine why they would be a carcinogen. http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/Newlist.htmlThis is a crazy b.s. California law designed to generate significant revenue for the state, because they're bankrupt. They can add items to the list anytime they want, and companies have to keep a full-time compliance director on staff to make sure they're not fined.Anyway, I think you'll be fine, but who knows? Maybe they're making the clips with Kryptonite =D That's probably based on California's Prop 65 act which requires labeling for 600 plus elements that they have on their carcinogen list. If you use these in the manner in which they are supposed to be used, I cannot imagine why they would be a carcinogen. http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/Newlist.htmlThis is a crazy b.s. California law designed to generate significant revenue for the state, because they're bankrupt. They can add items to the list anytime they want, and companies have to keep a full-time compliance director on staff to make sure they're not... » Read More That's probably based on California's Prop 65 act which requires labeling for 600 plus elements that they have on their carcinogen list. If you use these in the manner in which they are supposed to be used, I cannot imagine why they would be a carcinogen. http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/Newlist.htmlThis is a crazy b.s. California law designed to generate significant revenue for the state, because they're bankrupt. They can add items to the list anytime they want, and companies have to keep a full-time compliance director on staff to make sure they're not fined.Anyway, I think you'll be fine, but who knows? Maybe they're making the clips with Kryptonite =D « Show Less
1939136
Sorry, I returned the product. It does look sturdy though and was well packed. Looked like a good buy. I wasn't comfortable about the California Disclaimer. That should have been noted on the site.