Is this the SAME with Leica d-lux 4? But the price is almost a half of Leica. Can anyone tell me what difference is?
400290
From what I've read, this is basically the same hardware as the d-lux 4.Differences: different coating on the lens (same lens)different firmwarea longer warranty (either 2 or 3 years for Leica - different reviews give different figures - vs 1 year for the LX3).the red Leica logo!Also I've seen it suggested that there are some external bits of rubber trim on the LX3 which are not present on the Leica.I think you also get Capture One software with the Leica, which is a high-end RAW processing package.
1003770
Without any hesitation but with some more money on the table, my pick is the Leica. Colors are way superior and more pleasing than the Canon.
821881
Leica v lux 30. Older model but should take the same quality photos. The 40 is amazing. I would think the 30 would be too except not as long a zoom
2111912
Hi Mayra, Not sure why you're asking me this question, since I'm selling mine for about 20% of that. Please ask that seller. :). If they don't reply, it's probably because the D4 has only one CF slot, and one XQD slot, which is not widely adopted, so that seller may think they can gouge people on a camera with nearly the same megapixel count and very similar quality in every considerable area. Of course, the D4 shoots video, as well...it all depends on how you like to shoot, I guess. Even with a really nice piece of glass in front, no D3 is worth $10k.
1014702
This camera is made in Japan by Panasonic. It is branded Leica but basically a Panasonic DMC LX7K. All specs are the same, the body is almost a clone. The major difference is the superior finish and material feel of the Leica, the Leica name, and the software suite which is more extensive. I bought the Leica because I wanted the Leica name and software but bought the optional Panasonic branded electronic rangefinder eye piece. Save over $100 from the exact same piece with the Leica name on it. Ether way, whether you go whole hog for the Leica or save money with the Panasonic, its a terrific camera with an exquisite lens. This camera is made in Japan by Panasonic. It is branded Leica but basically a Panasonic DMC LX7K. All specs are the same, the body is almost a clone. The major difference is the superior finish and material feel of the Leica, the Leica name, and the software suite which is more extensive. I bought the Leica because I wanted the Leica name and software but bought the optional Panasonic branded electronic rangefinder eye piece. Save over $100 from the exact same piece with the Leica name on it. Ether way, whether you go whole hog for the Leica or save money with the Panasonic, its a terrific... » Read More This camera is made in Japan by Panasonic. It is branded Leica but basically a Panasonic DMC LX7K. All specs are the same, the body is almost a clone. The major difference is the superior finish and material feel of the Leica, the Leica name, and the software suite which is more extensive. I bought the Leica because I wanted the Leica name and software but bought the optional Panasonic branded electronic rangefinder eye piece. Save over $100 from the exact same piece with the Leica name on it. Ether way, whether you go whole hog for the Leica or save money with the Panasonic, its a terrific camera with an exquisite lens. « Show Less
1733243
I think the difference is in the lens. In the V-lux 3, the aperture narrows as focal length increases. In the 4, I believe it remains at the set value. I haven't found the change in aperture to be a problem. The Leica website will confirm this, if I am right.
1481043
Shutter lag is almost zero - one of the principle reasons I opted for the Panasonic brand. WYSIWYG results. The FZ50 fits this old SLR guy like a glove, and I don't have to carry multiple camera bodies around my neck. The Leica lens doesn't hurt either. However, I think if you are looking to shoot fast action sports there are better choices out there if multi-image features are important to you. This one camera has all my old equipment sitting dusty on a shelf somewhere...
490489
Its work good with my Leica D-lux 6. Highly recommended! The auto-lens cap is a bit loose and should be more tight. 4.5 Stars
1679834
http://www.flickr.com/groups/d40slr/discuss/72157602509321717/?search=sigma+vs.+nikon i know it's been a while but that may give some insight. i have the sigma version and it's great value for the price paid.
660620
The difference for me was the group focus feature, it seemed to lock in focus quicker and track subjects better. Low light is just awesome I have always hesitated cranking up the ISO too high because of the noise potential. It is simply amazing how you can take clean shots in low light situations like bars, parties, sports arenas. If most of your shooting involve low light venues you will see a difference. Wether this is enough to drive an upgrade is up to you. Regarding general picture quality I can't say there is a significant difference other than low light situation I mentioned. I own a d800 as well and use it when picture quality is absolutely critical. These are the 2 cameras in my bag and handles every situation I am faced with. If pic quality is what you seek you can grab a used d800 for under 2k. You will not be disappointed. Just my opinion.
678606
Well, the f/2.8 is a much newer lens and is superior to the f/4 in many performance aspects (AF speed, accuracy, etc). Don't get me wrong, though. The f/4 is still a solid performer. Sometimes, the f/4 captures better photos in the f/4-f/5.6 range than the f/2.8 does in that range.Now, since you stated that weight is a concern for you, I'd point out that the f/2.8 is a whole two times heavier than the f/4. The f/4 is also half the price of the f/2.8.If you shoot in low-light or indoor, then the f/2.8 is for you. If you shoot outdoor and have plenty of light, then the f/4 is just as good. Well, the f/2.8 is a much newer lens and is superior to the f/4 in many performance aspects (AF speed, accuracy, etc). Don't get me wrong, though. The f/4 is still a solid performer. Sometimes, the f/4 captures better photos in the f/4-f/5.6 range than the f/2.8 does in that range.Now, since you stated that weight is a concern for you, I'd point out that the f/2.8 is a whole two times heavier than the f/4. The f/4 is also half the price of the f/2.8.If you shoot in low-light or indoor, then the f/2.8 is for you. If you shoot outdoor and have plenty of light, then the f/4 is just... » Read More Well, the f/2.8 is a much newer lens and is superior to the f/4 in many performance aspects (AF speed, accuracy, etc). Don't get me wrong, though. The f/4 is still a solid performer. Sometimes, the f/4 captures better photos in the f/4-f/5.6 range than the f/2.8 does in that range.Now, since you stated that weight is a concern for you, I'd point out that the f/2.8 is a whole two times heavier than the f/4. The f/4 is also half the price of the f/2.8.If you shoot in low-light or indoor, then the f/2.8 is for you. If you shoot outdoor and have plenty of light, then the f/4 is just as good. « Show Less
1746412
Late to respond, but my previous camera was a Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ18, a point and shoot camera which I thought took outstanding pictures...until I bought the DMC-FZ150. Holy cow! What a jump in performance that even an unsavvy enthusiast like myself can actually use. I am, however, shocked by the price increase. I had to buy it online because it wasn't available locally but with the reviews and my past experience with Panasonic, I took a deep breath and did it, purchasing it through Amazon for $439 in early April 2012. I consider it top echelon of the "amateur" use cameras.
2197786
I'm a bit of a lens snob too, being a contax shooter. I bought the Lumix fz50 for my wife and it arrived yesterday, and let me tell you, it is fantastic; best digital camera I've ever held. We considered the nikon d80, but my wife preferred the LCD preview on the Lumix, and although it is easy to use, the manual options are versatile. FZ50 is not lighter than the nikon, but on the other hand, it has a 420mm Leica lens, so it does the job of two lenses. The price is incredibly low, I think because once you get out of the 300 dollar range, people think they need skip over to a DSLR. They're wrong! Lumix provides all you need with a Leica lens.
529975
PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price;PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor;X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it:* is a dust trap,* prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare),* delays startup time, and* needlessly consumes battery power.That said, I still favor the X1.I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4, after having had many LUMIX models.Available light performance should be great.I will tell you if I'm happy later. PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price;PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor;X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it:* is a dust trap,* prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare),* delays startup time, and* needlessly consumes battery power.That said, I still favor the X1.I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4,... » Read More PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price;PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor;X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it:* is a dust trap,* prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare),* delays startup time, and* needlessly consumes battery power.That said, I still favor the X1.I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4, after having had many LUMIX models.Available light performance should be great.I will tell you if I'm happy later. « Show Less
237930
I use mostly EVF and it works fine......Works better......I cannot compare. Overall, I have really been impressed with the zoom system. Since I have had and still do have lots of camera, this small Leica is very impressive with macro to long zooms. I put off getting the V-Lux 4 for about 2 years and after more study, I went for it. I have not been disappointed. I have let one of my daughters use it and without hardly any instruction, she has come up with some great shots.
461403
PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price; PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor; X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it: * is a dust trap, * prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare), * delays startup time, and * needlessly consumes battery power. That said, I still favor the X1. I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4, after having had many LUMIX models.Available light performance should be great. I will tell you if I'm happy later.What about the Lumix DMC-GF1? PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price; PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor; X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it: * is a dust trap, * prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare), * delays startup time, and * needlessly consumes battery power. That said, I still favor the X1. I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3... » Read More PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price; PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor; X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it: * is a dust trap, * prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare), * delays startup time, and * needlessly consumes battery power. That said, I still favor the X1. I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4, after having had many LUMIX models.Available light performance should be great. I will tell you if I'm happy later.What about the Lumix DMC-GF1? « Show Less
2023687
Sorry never used the Leica so unable to offer comparison. Btw you might want to be more specific as to what aspect of two cameras to be compared (IQ, ergonomics, etc.).