Whatâs the difference between the 1) Sundowner GTX Hiking Boot and 2) Summit GTX Waterproof Backpacking Boot?
1139164
I don't know anything about the Summit GTX, but the Sundowner is a gortex material that allows moisture to evaporate from the foot. I have used them in caving for years and have walked through streams in caves up to my knees for long periods and after a couple hours my feet inside the boot are dry. They don't let water in through the material from the outside but they breath it out from the inside.
904690
The Sundowner is more for everyday wear or short hikes. The Summit is a heavier boot made for more serious backpacking.
1595819
Hello. One is a summit and the other is a genesis. The summit chassis is the rolls Roys of grills. Go on the weber website to see full differences
71784
Buy a helmet that is designed for what you are doing. White water helmets are *much* more substantial than climbing helmets. Climbing helmets are designed to absorb the impact of one falling small/medium rock (anything larger and no helmet will do you any good), or perhaps a fall that swings you into a rock. Afterwards, they will likely need to be replaced. White water helmets are designed to protect you as you get swept through a rapids, bashing your head on every rock on the riverbed.
660533
I currently have both (Aggressor in Tundra and the 3-in-1 in Black) and am deciding which to keep. By all observations these two jackets are identical in size, build quality, stitching, insulation, waterproofness, etc.So much so, that it appears the only real differences are: 1. the available colors. Aggressor has Tundra or Tan. 3-in-1 has Black, Navy or Red. 2. the microphone molle at each shoulder on the 3-in-one jacket. There doesn't appear to be any justification for the 3-in-1's higher price. Guess you need to pay it if you want black. Would be nice if the outer shells and the fleece jackets were sold individually so you could mix and match the colors. I currently have both (Aggressor in Tundra and the 3-in-1 in Black) and am deciding which to keep. By all observations these two jackets are identical in size, build quality, stitching, insulation, waterproofness, etc.So much so, that it appears the only real differences are: 1. the available colors. Aggressor has Tundra or Tan. 3-in-1 has Black, Navy or Red. 2. the microphone molle at each shoulder on the 3-in-one jacket. There doesn't appear to be any justification for the 3-in-1's higher price. Guess you need to pay it if you want black. Would be nice... » Read More I currently have both (Aggressor in Tundra and the 3-in-1 in Black) and am deciding which to keep. By all observations these two jackets are identical in size, build quality, stitching, insulation, waterproofness, etc.So much so, that it appears the only real differences are: 1. the available colors. Aggressor has Tundra or Tan. 3-in-1 has Black, Navy or Red. 2. the microphone molle at each shoulder on the 3-in-one jacket. There doesn't appear to be any justification for the 3-in-1's higher price. Guess you need to pay it if you want black. Would be nice if the outer shells and the fleece jackets were sold individually so you could mix and match the colors. « Show Less
526747
I'm not using it on a summit, using mine on an SCX-10, but I am going to get one for my slash 4x4 when money allows. Metal gears, more torque, and still waterproof! My stock 2075 in my slash crapped out after like 4 packs for no apparent reason... so for me it is definitely a worthwhile upgrade!
1363333
I order a pair of Teeter cobra XL. I found it to be more stronger and give better support than the Blue teeter gravity. I work out 5 days a we and my Buddy just happen to have own the blue teeter gravity boots. I feel for 247 lb man hanging from them, they feel like it going to break on me. I love the cobra & my feel the same he jusst order a pair too.
1267614
I did some research on the YakTrax site and it looks like there are Pro and Extreme versions that would be more suited for hiking. I am a hiker so I was considering these but now I'm thinking that I should get one of the other versions.
911010
I don't swim or hike in the rain, so I have no experience with this question and don't even understand what the difference would be between the two terms. So I can't help.
522104
We have both. The only difference I can see is the material and the graphica has the boot.
1026331
As for UV protection it is comparable to both the Sun Mountain and the Gustbuster UV versions. I've used both.
509929
nothing is different except coler. Climber I is the glossy red when climber II is the matte one
816423
if you go to the Ultra Paws web site they kind of tell you what boot is best for what application. I have not seen the durable boot
127043
I have both brands and they both are pretty rugged, but it really depends what you intend to use it for.
522103
Not 100% sure but I think the difference is that the graphics comes with a cozy foot cover..I really wanted it but.... I never use it so I so t think it's worth the extra $
327295
they both work great I just purchased the ones with the logo, so when I go kayaking my feet stay warm during this time of year.
846273
I don't know. I do know the "trail" version is definitely thicker/heavier than the "run" version. I don't know if warmth is noticeable, since it's ankle-length, but the thickness is different
1114656
The Garmin Edge is intended for cycling use. It has far more bells and whistles than a runner or hiker may want to use. Garmin makes a product for runners called a Forerunner worn as a watch and is less expensive than a Garmin 810. A hiker would better advise what is best to use for off-road hiking. I would not buy a Garmin 810 for running or hiking.