I have a 80-200 AFD 2.8 Nikon lens that I use on my D600. I shoot people mainly parties and a few weddings Is it still worth getting this lens.
1150052
Yes, it worth it. Have far less chromatic aberrations, more definition across all the frame, and weights far less. This lens is very good starting F1.8, but at the range F4-F8 it shines, even better than Nikkor 105 mm F1.8, which was my previous sharper lens
1150053
Parties and weddings tend to be dark so the extra stop is welcomed. Also, the 85 is MUCH lighter in weight than the 80-200. If you're walking around all evening with that huge zoom on your camera that could make a difference. To me, I don't see where a 80-200 zoom is much use inside at a party or wedding. So I say go for the 85 f/1.8, you won't be sorry.
1150054
Yes. The lens shoots with zero distortion or CA and is much lighter and easier to carry. Although, it depends on the amount of use you get from your 80-200. If that's an effective focal length, this lens is basically perfect.
1150055
I would say yes. For me though, I would think the biggest reason would be to not have a large zoom lens on the front of the camera. Not only lighter, smaller lenses tend to put people at ease. As to zoom, lots of times just taking a couple steps forward or backward is all the zoom you need (but, not always). Given the quality, price, lightness, and size, I think this belongs in any enthusiast/pro kit.
1150056
But you already have the 85mm range on your 80-200mm AFD 2.8. Unless you need the extra stop of light.
1150057
Only if a faster lens without having to increase the iso is important to how you use the camera. Zooms have an inherent distortion and this prime lens, while locking you into a specific focal length, provides very sharp images, especially for people pix.
928326
If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're looking for an ultrawide for DX, take a look at the Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 10-24. If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're... » Read More If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're looking for an ultrawide for DX, take a look at the Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 10-24. « Show Less
1192316
I have had the 18 to 200. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that lens. If you're predisposed towards it, I won't try to talk you out of it, BUT . . I really like the 18 to 140 on my daily carry D5200. Fits the job and fits my hands. VERY sharp with great contrast and saturation. BTW, my fair, civic gathering lens in my D300s is almost always the 18 to 300, so ya makes your choice and you take your chances. IMHO, as long as it says "Nikon" on, you can't go wrong. Pick one.
1251771
i bought that lens for my d7000 and had great success with it . i gave my daughter the camera and lens and since have bought the d800 and liked the lens so much i bought it again for that camera . with that said i recently sold that lens and am in the process of getting the newest nikon lens the 80-400mm . to sum up my reply great lens but its my understanding that because of the wide range the sensor area is always affected but should work fine when used on your d700...i believe this lens is a great buy
2236129
It's a great portrait lens. It will be wonderful on the a d40. I think that it really comes into it's own on fx though. That way you can really take advantage of the narrow depth of field as well as precise focus .
1736483
It's worth every penny, especially if you take portrait shots. I do not have the 18-200, but I have the 16-85 VRII. While the 16-85 is a great lens for outdoor shots, landscape and group photos, the quality of portrait I get from the 85 1.8 (or any prime lens for that matter) is way above any all around zoom. Most pictures I take with this lens are worth keeping.
2118677
this is a very versatile lens however if you are shooting weddings I would recommend a constant aperture through the zoom range. This lens loses light through your zoom range. I would not recommend this lens as a primary for wedding photography. That being said, it is a great lens to have in your arsenal when you learn it's best applications...my advice rent a lens before you buy to make sure...it will cost a but more but in the long run it's better to know a lens will fit your needs than to buy one and be disappointed
1891734
i have a d5100 and a d600. i had a very hard time getting focus with the d5100 and this lens for portraits. i actually used liveview to make it work. however, once i got the d600, it became soooo much better. the improved af and field of view on the d600 makes it much more reliable to shoot at f2.8 - f/4. shooting head and shoulders shots with the d600 at f/4 is amazing!
928327
This was the first lens I bought when I switched from a DX D7000 to an FX D600. If you plan to eventually move up to a FX Nikon body I'd definitely recommend this lens as it will work on your D60 (but as Tom V said, the D60 won't take full advantage of the lenses capabilities). One of the first photos I took with this lens was printed on 13" x 19" photo paper and I'm very impressed with the results. Years ago I bought the Nikkor 70-300mm 4.5-5.6 G lens not knowing it was an FX lens. It worked well on the DX body but much better on the FX D600. Hope this helps.
360248
Jade this is a wonderful lens. Perfect for close ups and portrait shots. It's a tack sharp lens. Just remember when shooting up close at 1.4 have their face(s) parallel to you or you may get some slight blurring. If you have them tilted focus on the eye closest to you. My friend is a professional wedding photographer and loves this lens. I shoot with the Sigma 85mm 1.4 and love it. Good luck with your wedding.
357728
It's the only lens I use for my 800. With occasional hiccups trying to focus through car window glass. It's sharp enough for my varied uses. I was sold on the lens by tests performed and published on the blog Photography Life and you'll also find info on the 24-70, but the 2.8 will give you a softer background.
626722
It's a very good low light lens, however if you use a F/2.8 aperture be very careful with your depth of field. Depth of field is very shallow with that large aperture. Stop it down to f/4 or more if possible.
1379524
I'm using it on my D7100 and it's a great lens. It is heavy but it's solid ~ I've taken it on a few trips now and I love it.
1032413
I have a D800 and it works great. The lens is very clear and focus is great.
608930
I have a D80 too and it's an awesome lens. I'm an amateur as well so I don't know too much about photography but this lens has a decent balance between depth of field and zoom for its affordable price.
928325
If by nature you intend to shoot landscapes, this lens is ideal. It's perhaps the sharpest wide angle zoom Nikon offers today. It is not what I would use for birds or distant objects that need tele zoom. There I typically use the 28-300 on full frame cameras and for your D60 DX camera the 18-200mm is great.
2004343
My son has that camera and loves it. I have the D7000. I really like the lens and very good at partys and I do allot of senior shots. I have mine for sale if your interested. I have a Nikon 18-105 for sale too that came with my D7000. I bought a D600 for xmas and the DX lenes are a nuisance on that camera so I'm going to sell of some of the DX lens and buy a FX lens. Let me know if your at all interested. Julie