Which one is better the XRS9370 or XRS9470? What is the range? Does one have a better range?
1138189
No Not really, If anything Just between the two that you mentioned i would rate them exactly the same, besides price wise, and one speaks out the letters "KA, K, X, Etc.." (or your can turn the speaker lady off) but as for range they would have to be exactly the same. And just like with any radar detect. it would all depend how you set yours up and where you place it in your vehicle, the instructions with the 9470 tells you step by step how to get the BEST performance out of it, and the one thing i did notice less trees and cars in your way a LOT further it can :) hope this helps... ( sorry the Delay, couldn't find your question)
2143452
I own both, my wife uses the HP100 and I use the HP 470 with my Toshiba laptop and carry it on business travel. It, the HP470 has never failed me.My wife has no complaints. I use it wired, not wireless. My 470 is black her's is chrome, that seems to be the only difference....Good Luck
660538
I had it appx 40 f away from router it did help maintain stable signals, which was good for upstsirs.but it cut the speed from 50 to 22 mbs for the ehole house.this why i returned it
955394
I'm using one that is 12.5 inches long. I can hit a 440 repeater 20 miles away from inside my house. I can also hit a 2 meter repeater 15 miles away. Although the reports are not full quieting, when I go outside the signal reports improve dramatically.
245801
I don't know. I returned mine ss I was not getting the range advertised. I like the lg ones better.
1256532
Not sure about that question, but I had the iRAD 500 and the distance is not that great I returned it and bought the iRAD 900 it works way better then the 500.
1364935
We have a variety of range extenders: RE1000, RE2000, RE3000, RE4000 and RE6500. The best range extender for will depend on what type of wireless network you have. If you have dual-band router, you can choose between RE2000, RE4000 and RE6500. Powerline adapters also helps you extend your WiFi network by making use of your electrical connection. For more details, check the links below: Powerline Adapters: http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?pid=80&vw=1&articleid=17151 Product comparison chart for Linksys range extenders: http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?pid=80&app=vw&vw=1&login=1&json=1&docid=728b4d6a49b64beda1b0ec60ffcd7621_Product_Comparison_Chart_for_Linksys_Range_Extenders.xml& This should also help you out: http://www.linksys.com/en-us/wireless/build/my/network The difference between 200Mbps and 500Mbps is that the latter is faster in terms of transfer rate than the former.
155117
I bought the WNDR37AV. The router in the box has the WNDR3700 model number. It really is the exact same router. I don't know why the changed the model number on the box. It only causes confusion when choosing between the two.
1482976
The Max would be my first choice. It works like a 9500 with much better range. Both are very good detectors.
749009
There's two systems 4702 or 4712. 2.2Ghz vs 2.3Ghz. The former is $1774 and latter is $2199.$1774 is great price. Price has probably been lowered to clear inventory. It's possible there may be hardware issues with 4702 that we're fixed in 4712 ( just speculation on my part ). $1774 is really good price. I paid $2199 for 4712.
235098
If you watch a lot of SD tv you will probably want to spend the extra $600 on the XRB4 since it will up convert the signal to 1080p. I have the W3000 and my friend has the XRB4 and every time I watch SD tv on his I realize how bad mine looks on SD. However if you plan to go mostly HD I would save the $600. HD wise I can't tell the difference between W3000 and XRB4
1965993
Someone posted in the following link at the forum over at SmallnetBuilder that they have received the v2 from Amazon. That doesn't guarantee someone else will, however, but I am personally worth considering the new Netgear Rangemax WNDR3700 given the excellent reviews and reported stability (and similar cost).http://forums.smallnetbuilder.com/showthread.php?t=229&page;=16
1097008
Without an swr matcher, the A99 runs 40 CB channels well has below 1.5 swr match right out of the box - I use a matcher and get 12, 11, 10 meters - 22-30 mH...handles linear amp power well. never adjust rings. Use very good low loss cable. Great for freaked radios-covers easily above and below 11 meters. Coil system discharges static electricity build up, so helps with lightning protection. 3 fiber glass sections-18 feet high - works mounted low too, since has low radiation with optional radisals. Handles weather, rain/wind well. Have had couple since the 80's, I think. A99 is half wave, better than 1/4 wave, OR maybe upgrade to 5/8 wave--A99 is kind of a beginners antenna, with a good $ price. Without an swr matcher, the A99 runs 40 CB channels well has below 1.5 swr match right out of the box - I use a matcher and get 12, 11, 10 meters - 22-30 mH...handles linear amp power well. never adjust rings. Use very good low loss cable. Great for freaked radios-covers easily above and below 11 meters. Coil system discharges static electricity build up, so helps with lightning protection. 3 fiber glass sections-18 feet high - works mounted low too, since has low radiation with optional radisals. Handles weather, rain/wind well. Have had couple since the 80's, I think. A99 is half wave,... » Read More Without an swr matcher, the A99 runs 40 CB channels well has below 1.5 swr match right out of the box - I use a matcher and get 12, 11, 10 meters - 22-30 mH...handles linear amp power well. never adjust rings. Use very good low loss cable. Great for freaked radios-covers easily above and below 11 meters. Coil system discharges static electricity build up, so helps with lightning protection. 3 fiber glass sections-18 feet high - works mounted low too, since has low radiation with optional radisals. Handles weather, rain/wind well. Have had couple since the 80's, I think. A99 is half wave, better than 1/4 wave, OR maybe upgrade to 5/8 wave--A99 is kind of a beginners antenna, with a good $ price. « Show Less
1638960
I found it better to use a different ssid. This way your devices in the farthest reaches if your house are guaranteed to use the repeater and not accidently connect to the router. I have no issues with laptops and phones seamlessly transitioning.
894056
upon the time I look I did not find a wdnr4000 anymore only it's lower end 3700 brother. Looking at the obvious difference is the network speed which means example wdnr4300 has more speed technically means steadier output less interruption for your use. However it has a downside cloud reason you want a better router not only for it's speed, signal strength, or disk space but you want it's security. Anything cloud poses that threat to you. Im not security expert I only research and build computers. If you want a true tech engineer look at overclockers.com or tomshardware.com be advised sometimes things they say unless you really are into it you may find it more work ahead just to understand what's given. Construction wise according to my numerous findings and researches CISCO and Netgear sadly are not so different now. CISCO used to be top of the game and dead given choice given the money allows. Dont get me wrong I still believe at a company scale you can still ask them to custom make a router just for your company. Commercial grade material at huge cost so consumers outta question. Hope this guides your decision PS if you are still looking for wdnr4300 looks from my side Amazon has drop the price further to 92.99. Be sure to research the inventory and get your cheapest price as your right.
1027017
The only difference I can see is the expanded range. More distant between the base and the handset on the 158 model. We are using it for our business and it working very well.
155121
If you buy the WNDR37AV from Amazon, you will receive the WNDR3700v2 in the box which is inferior at the moment because the firmware is old. It's having issues loading web pages at the moment. That issue was fixed with the 3700 and 37AV but the firmware doesn't work for the 3700v2.