This one is better than the 6800k ?
1125861
this 7700K some what same but new GPU and PCI E 3.0 Support for New GPU on the Market the 6800k is PCI E 2.0 only
1697112
4670k to take advantage of the overclocking capabilities of the mobo, or u can go with the 4670
758056
Hope this website link will help you with your decision. http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/389/AMD_A10-Series_A10-7700K_vs_AMD_A8-Series_A8-6600K.html
1317421
The biggest improvement is in the TIM (thermal interface material) which will improve temp's, resulting in a better overclock. Many enthusiast replaced the TIM on the 4670K's and lowered their temps by 10-20*C. I haven't seen any benchmarks published but I would be surprised if there's more than 5% improvement on any of the test. Also, there is an improvement on the integrated graphics.
45973
Yes but it is not much of an upgrade over the 6800 that came with your computer. A nice entry level card. I use it for video streaming to my tv thru the computer and it works great.Good luck
274088
The stock heatsink and fan that comes with the cpu works fine for me and I have it installed in one of those very compact htpc cases (Antec ISK-100) over a year now. This processor is NOT the overclocked version which is usually called the (K) model so I don't see why it would be necessary to have a third party state of the art heatsink and fan. I guess if you purchased the overclocked cpu version of this processor and planned on pushing it to the limits then I would recommend finding a much better heatsink and fan unit over the stock model. I have a really nice and expensive Cool Master heatsink and fan unit on a desktop computer and I don't see any difference in performance or heating issues over the stock heatsink and fan with the exception of more noise that the Cool Master makes because of it's larger and faster fan. I'm sorry to say, I was once bitten by the performance bug when building that ole desktop and should have just saved the money and go stock instead.
1633150
This is a quad core, not 8 core. Intel typically is a little ahead of AMD in terms of innovation, but at this price level, you probably won't be able to see a difference.
758060
It depends on what you will be using it for. The A10-7850K is more advanced by having 12 cores, This is good for gaming and allows the ability for gaming without the need of a good graphics card. I bought the AMD Quad-Core A8-Series APU for an office computer and it is fast.
2026066
Yes it is an improvement but not a hugely massive one. The R7 260x is virtually an overclocked 7xxx series. This card is perfect for 1080p gaming and converts video well. If you are looking for leaps and bounds in performance I would go with an R9 series. This card is a pretty good improvement on what you have now though.
1408500
Really nothing, only difference between the 2 is the core clock, wich if you overclock at all you could overclock the 1 to match the other. But basically the 770 is a charged up 680. Its same chip GK104, the 770 has a better memory clock than the 680 and the 770 has gpu 2.0 boost wich the 680 doesn't. but all in all there the same. I ve got the FTW myself and its been great, no problems here.
1767345
The super clocked edition comes even more over locked than this one out of the box. If you're one to overclock anyways, thus one will be fine as I can get a 400+ ghz overclock easily. I have mine where I want it, but I can go further. And the temps stay fairly low, in the mid-upper 50's. The fan doesn't even ramp up too far!
187115
Depends on what you expect! For normal applications the difference between that quad and a core duo aren't really overwhelming - if you do video stuff it's almost twice as fast as a duo though.... Remember to get a good cooler with it - this thing eats up twice the wattage of a duo and needs to be cooled accordingly....
860856
Really a silly question. Better for what? Performance or quiet? The performance is better at cooling while the quiet cools also but not as well since its are to be smaller and quieter. If you don't overclock or use cpu heavy programs/tasks (like editing or conversions) then the quiet will be more than enough while also being cheaper. If your a gamer than you should already have gpu with its own cooling that doesn't tax the cpu.
2176788
Hi. If you run one monitor 1080p. And can run everything smooth. Why you waste ur money. And u recommend for now to go with 980 its cheaper and better.
1331132
I'd go for one of the R7 or R9 cards if you can. from that 5760 to 6850 you aren't going to see a huge performance difference.
2126942
You are welcome, I hope it helps. The only reason I can see to upgrade from what you have is if you do other heavy CPU intensive programs other than gaming. Of course, if you plan to keep that computer for 5 years, who knows what games will be like then? If they are that CPU demanding in 5 years, it will be time to upgrade anyway. I have 2 3770Ks, a 2600K and a 2500K and can't tell the difference in gaming with any of them other than the GPU.
1841109
sli 2 video cards just buy a better video card this is he future a single video card has better performance than 2 6800's