versus the MSR pocket rocket?
1129048
I own both. This one is not as well built as the MSR, but it is still damn strong, and well worth it. The built in piezoelectric ignitor works too. I considered it a great value.
1403324
For the money go with the M250 IF you are in the southern states, south facing roof where you panel will be producing more power. If not then take the M215
1055846
I started with the b6-4 and had no problems. My guess is they say to start small so you can get used to the rocket if you have not launched them before. They do have quite a bit of power and might go higher than most people would expect of not familiar with them.
2021142
I would recommend going to a Blade MSR First....it is the next step (intermediate) from a coaxial heli like the Syma 107.....I started flying Heli's back in November on the coaxials (syma). Then I tried the Blade MCX2 (which is a nicer version of the symas.). Then went to the blade MSR which is more advanced, yet you can always let go of the control sticks and it will go back to hover. With the Collective Pitch heli's, such as the nano, you cannot get away with that. I am now love the nano and it is my favorite to fly, but you need to work you way up to it.
1136764
The D size rocket engine from Estes is my favorite. The C works well too, but the rockets does not go up as far; that's what I use on breezey days so I d't loose my rocket!
1025548
No, not if they are on the same plane. I think you would want the smaller style, something like magpul offers.
2240447
I wouldn't recommend using any other fuel source unless directed on the stove!! I have a micro rocket and it uses only one fuel source and I don't use anything but what it's designed for!!
2019562
.22 larger, so slower. But packs more punch. Would you rather be hit by a very fast pebble, or a fast rock?
465105
Yes, an 8oz msr fuel canister fits inside perfectly. It also has some extra room at the top to fit your pockect rocket if its small enough. I have the volcano pocket rocket from this site and it fits perfectly inside with a fuel canister. I would highly recommend this mess kit its well worth the money.
2173266
Yes, Miss Tucker is correct on both counts; despite appearing ruggedly built, this lighter turned out to be a waste of a few dollars. Go with one of the others; bought for Husband and he had much better success with the silver S3 Triple Jet and the 45 degree (pineapple) shaped single jet. Both work well while under-way out on the water. Husband also keeps 2 more + fuel in our hurricane emergency supplies as well.
2153957
I have not tried every pocket radio out there but I am a DX AM and Shortwave hobbiest of 30 years. I was a subscriber of Passpoart to World Band until it folded 10 years ago. I have owned nearly all of the top pocket and ;arge portable radios and still have the famous Sony IFC 2010, had the Grundig Satellite 700, have the famous Yatchboy 400. This radio is actually a CCRANE ordered modified Redsun RP300. I've used a Chinese Redsun RP300 for several years and I now own the version Redsun makes for CCRANE. I have dealt with CRANE & its products for years, spoke to Bob Crane several times. It is not the company it was when Bob ran it. Bob did not crossly exaggerate like the MDAs at CCRANE do now and he would never have branded the cheap Chinese garbage pocker radio with timed recording capabilities CCRANE still sells. I stopped taking CCRANE seriously after buying that radio a few years ago for over $125. You cab barely hear it even with earbuds! I decided to try this SW Pocket radio after selling it listed on Amazon. I could easily return it if I found the Redsun version better. I like the Redsun, considering the best pocket sized radio out there. I got it for $25 & free shipping directly from China. It took a month to get to me and really has no warranty as I must pay return shipping to China. I was surprised by what I got! The CCRANE version is clearly improved over the original Redsun RP300, even the push button volume control is improved. It goes one step lower than the original, which has a fault of push button volume controls. The reception is very good, better than any pocket radio I've ever seen. And the AM noise cancelling is exceptional. Keep in mind. Reception is only so much the radio and largely the antenna, I am impressed the AM is as good as it is with such a small radio antenna!
773442
The blade MSR is a fixed pitch heli. Unsure if there is a FBL version. I've moved up to 450 size collective pitch helis. You should also check out the V911. Same performance as the MSR at a fraction do the cost.
1962734
nothing compares to the m50, it's origin's murray cup champion, successor to the 300i. it's small, lightweight, and very fast. 4 hardpoints for 2 missiles and 2 class 1 weapons. trust me go with the m50
631399
Stessco 3.95 mtr with 30 yammy.The Minnkota is great for both trolling and getting in amongst the trees.The anchor with I pilot is great
1664769
I have not seen the Simmons. I am very pleased with my Celestron up thru 40X or maybe 45X. Above that, the optics are not as clear, and detail is not much more visible, even though the image is larger. Most of my useage is 1.5-2 miles looting at wildlife. At shorter ranges, the higher magnification would probably be adequate as well, that's just not what I use it for. Moon shots are impressive!
1154321
Running dynamics statistics are the differences, but not worth the money. The 610 have more features like bike mode and customs workouts.
1229413
I have experience with both. The Ultra model has a better design on the nose for when the rocket comes down, but it doesn't go as high, since it weighs more. The performance seems to go higher with not as much protection on the nose of the rocket. The rockets are both built of THIN plastic as well as the stand to shoot the rocket. It's a cheap toy for a cheap price. My OPINION would be to go with the Ultra because I don't know how well the rockets will hold up with the Performance. The Performance was a x-mas present for my daughter. It's cold where I live so we haven't been able to use it as much as we would like too. I have experience with both. The Ultra model has a better design on the nose for when the rocket comes down, but it doesn't go as high, since it weighs more. The performance seems to go higher with not as much protection on the nose of the rocket. The rockets are both built of THIN plastic as well as the stand to shoot the rocket. It's a cheap toy for a cheap price. My OPINION would be to go with the Ultra because I don't know how well the rockets will hold up with the Performance. The Performance was a x-mas present for my daughter. It's cold where I live so we haven't been able to use it... » Read More I have experience with both. The Ultra model has a better design on the nose for when the rocket comes down, but it doesn't go as high, since it weighs more. The performance seems to go higher with not as much protection on the nose of the rocket. The rockets are both built of THIN plastic as well as the stand to shoot the rocket. It's a cheap toy for a cheap price. My OPINION would be to go with the Ultra because I don't know how well the rockets will hold up with the Performance. The Performance was a x-mas present for my daughter. It's cold where I live so we haven't been able to use it as much as we would like too. « Show Less