How does this compare to the Audio-Technica AT95E cartridge?
1146853
Hi, the two are polar opposites. The At95e tracks better and has a very natural tone. It is also likely to work on a wider number of tables. The Grado is the data retrieval champ thanks to a much better cantilever. The Grado has a huge wide sound stage and is warmer too. The Grado is big and lush but not as good of a tracker. Choose the Grado for classical, opera, jazz and prog rock. Choose the AT for indie rock, metal, and pop. I use both on two different tables. Cannot live without either and have used both designs for 30 years. I own the Linn and Clearaudio variants of the AT as well. My Grado is on a big Technics direct drive and Technics belt drive. The AT and variants are on Project and Clearaudio tables. Hope this helps.
1146854
Not sure. I have a Pickering xv-15 and there's no comparison, the grado does not sound as warm
1146855
Sorry, i don't have the audio techinica cartridge, but i prefer my shure cartridge than grado.
1390840
Coincidentally, my local music store had a headphone testing/"sale"(10%, covered tax lol) over the weekend. I own the anniversary ed and , although i was there to pick up my guitar cabinet, I tried out the white K702, along with other headphones. The amplifier used was a different form factor than my own(they had a solid state and i use tube), but the noticeable differences, regardless, where bass and comfort. the Annies performed better in these areas. There are claims that trebles are also improved, more clear and tight, but i would have needed to hear both headphones in the same setup to have noticed. Coincidentally, my local music store had a headphone testing/"sale"(10%, covered tax lol) over the weekend. I own the anniversary ed and , although i was there to pick up my guitar cabinet, I tried out the white K702, along with other headphones. The amplifier used was a different form factor than my own(they had a solid state and i use tube), but the noticeable differences, regardless, where bass and comfort. the Annies performed better in these areas. There are claims that trebles are also improved, more clear and tight, but i would have needed to hear both headphones in the... » Read More Coincidentally, my local music store had a headphone testing/"sale"(10%, covered tax lol) over the weekend. I own the anniversary ed and , although i was there to pick up my guitar cabinet, I tried out the white K702, along with other headphones. The amplifier used was a different form factor than my own(they had a solid state and i use tube), but the noticeable differences, regardless, where bass and comfort. the Annies performed better in these areas. There are claims that trebles are also improved, more clear and tight, but i would have needed to hear both headphones in the same setup to have noticed. « Show Less
2120135
I can't tell exactly what kind of cartridge it uses. (There is a pyramid design on the exposed end.) However, it looks nothing like the Otophone cartridges.
1136301
Leonard, I gifted the Audio Technica turntable to a friend, thus, I cannot specifically answer your question with any authority. However, I have read that "purists" swear by a virgin vinyl recording played through an excellent turntable (into a very high quality amplifier with top signal-to-noise specs), as having superior dynamic range - as compared to a digital rendition of the same musical selection. To my untrained ears, the digital rendition, captured at the right sample and bit rate, will ALWAYS sound superior to any analog playback. This is simply due to things like wow, flutter, low frequency rumble, and other such artifacting that is unique to the analog playback process using a turntable. Then there is always the ever-present noise that can often be introduced in (both vacuum tube and solid state) preamps and routine audio frequency amplifier signal processing. Just my humble opinion, but I could be wrong!
231537
Personally I would go with the AT92E over the AT311EP as it is cheaper and shares many internal parts. The big difference is gain, the AT311 has a gain of 5mV whereas the AT92E has the more standard 3.3mV.Either of these AT carts will sound decent, though probably not as detailed as your P22 which I suspect you are replacing due to wear.The weak link in these is the needle ... check this out if your budget allows http://www.turntableneedles.com/AT92E-Cartridge-wShibata-JICO-Brand-Needle_p_3716.html
70175
No, I haven't noticed a difference. I did buy the generic cartridge once and, wow, it was horrible. But you're good w/ this one.
510711
An AT95E cartridge. The one that came with my turntable was defective. AT sent me another one and it works fine now.
294263
Better. No comparison. 3000 is a solid unit, hassle free. But that unit is old,there are other options in that price range now... check out the numark. Or see if you can find a used m audio xponent. Owned that one for years.... way superior to either.
752369
Yes you need a cartridge. I would without a doubt recommend. Audio-Technica at-440mla
1210809
Audio-Technica AT92ECD Universal Replacement Magnetic Phono Cartridge is one very good option.
752366
Yes, you have to. I bought this one: Shure M97xE High-Performance Magnetic Phono Cartridge It seems to be recommended by Audio-Technica. You can read reviews about it on that amazon page.
2152609
I purchased SHURE M44-7 for 45 records and it's a world of difference...For LP's i've been using audio technica AT440ML.. I also use the spin clean record washing system, it's alot cheaper than the other cleaners on the market and does a fantastic job.....
2152610
In my opinion, yes, it would be better---probably brighter, with better treble and more detail---if that's what you're looking for. Audio Technica cartridges are an excellent value---even the inexpensive models sound great. You might also want to check out reviews of the Audio Technica AT-3482 p-mount cartridge, which features a rare carbon fiber cantilever (said to dampen lingering resonance from pits & scratches.) A lot of people, including me, like that one, too. It's slightly cheaper and might be perfect for your purposes. Actually, I don't think you could go wrong with any of the Audio Technica models. Good Luck---I hope that helps! In my opinion, yes, it would be better---probably brighter, with better treble and more detail---if that's what you're looking for. Audio Technica cartridges are an excellent value---even the inexpensive models sound great. You might also want to check out reviews of the Audio Technica AT-3482 p-mount cartridge, which features a rare carbon fiber cantilever (said to dampen lingering resonance from pits & scratches.) A lot of people, including me, like that one, too. It's slightly cheaper and might be perfect for your purposes. Actually, I don't think you could go wrong with any of the Audio... » Read More In my opinion, yes, it would be better---probably brighter, with better treble and more detail---if that's what you're looking for. Audio Technica cartridges are an excellent value---even the inexpensive models sound great. You might also want to check out reviews of the Audio Technica AT-3482 p-mount cartridge, which features a rare carbon fiber cantilever (said to dampen lingering resonance from pits & scratches.) A lot of people, including me, like that one, too. It's slightly cheaper and might be perfect for your purposes. Actually, I don't think you could go wrong with any of the Audio Technica models. Good Luck---I hope that helps! « Show Less
449483
i replaced my SL1200 with the Audio Technica AT-LP1240. the AT has a more powerful motor than my worn out Technics, built in USB for copying to computer, and has a switchable on/off preamp built in. there are reasons why Technics discontinued these.
1884670
Bohemian Boy is right. I have owned both the UE's and the Shure and I did extensive research on both before purchasing each. I will say the SE535 has slightly better bass. Not to say the UE have lacking bass, the difference is small but enough to notice. The UE have far superior sound quality in terms of highs and midrange. At this level of headphone it really depends on the type of music you listen to. Most claim to be all around listeners, including myself, but I will say that the artist with the most songs on my iPod is metallica if that tells you anything in regards the genre these headphones cater to. I range in anything from classic rock to metal to more modern rock. I have rap/hip hop, classical like beethoven, jazz, blues, dub step, R&B, and pretty much anything else besides country. I believe I have just one song that could even be considered country. I owned the triplefi 10 pro before these and upgraded June of last year and couldn't be happier. I had the Triplefi 10's for over a year and have had these for about 7 months and never had a problem with functionality. For the record though I never had a problem with the Shure's either. I recently sold them though as I prefer the UE and didn't need two pairs of high end headphones. Hope this helps!
1963992
I just looked up your TT and it appears to be a standard 1/2" cartridge, so yes, this will fit and work on the XL-100. Only problem that may come up is that you need to use the included adapter and attach that to your headshell, so be sure to line it up just right. If you do that, you'll be good to go. For a couple bucks more though, I recommend the AT311EP from Audio Technica. Essentially the same cart, but with slightly better specs. I have both and tend to use my 311 more than the 92. Regardless, enjoy! http://www.amazon.com/AUDIO-TECHNICA-Universal-Turntable-Cartridge/dp/B0002ZUN1O/ref=pd_cp_MI_0
288859
This cartridge is an excellent performer. You can Google it on a site called Audiokarma to see audio experts feedback. If the rest of your gear is up to it you may want to consider the Denon here... http://www.needledoctor.com/Denon-DL-110-Cartridge?sc=2&category;=369 This is considered one of the best cartridges for the money that will mate well with the Technics tonearm.