What is the main difference between Forerunner 220 vs 620? Is it worth the $150 price differential?
1154319
The comparison "chart": https://www.dropbox.com/s/u7w8hrzjqlg4pzo/Screenshot%202014-04-22%2008.43.48.png620 has (that 220 does not): VO2 max estimate Recovery advisor Race predictor Running dynamics However, it doesn't even reliably track miles, I regret the purchase. My last marathon, it cut short two of my laps, leading me to believe I was almost done when actually had more than a mile to go. Not helpful.
1154320
I have the 620. My advice is to save your money. The extra features such as Recovery Manager or V02 Max don't justify the additional cost. I was also not impressed by the "color" screen. It is grayscale with some very minor color features so don't get your hopes up that you get some briliant color screen similar to a smart phone.
1154321
Running dynamics statistics are the differences, but not worth the money. The 610 have more features like bike mode and customs workouts.
1154322
This is my wife's watch. Never had the 220. Her 610 was stolen so bought the 620. She likes it better. Blue tooth is easier to upload and it locates a satellite much faster. Plus a little smaller & lighter. The 620 was 399 vs. 299 for last year's 610 model
1464037
I considered the 1490, but I don't need the bluetooth or traffic. I ended up buying the nuvi 865T and am happy with it. Some problems getting updates on the Garmin website. Also POI's were available for download on my old 265 e.g. Kauai, but none for the 800 series.
1165437
From what I can see, the 6000 is all plastic, the 6200 is stainless steel. All the other features look the same. I have the 6000 and love it.
9024
I'm surprised no one has given you a suggestion. On the off chance you are still looking, I'll add a comment or two. Obviously, any of the units you have listed "could" do the job very well (I've heard good and bad things about each of them). Multiple routing (which my unit doesn't have) would be very nice to have if it's implemented properly. I originally wanted the Magellan because I liked its features better than the others (especially the AAA feature), but didn't want to take a chance (their customer support is terrible). And any unit that allows you to exclude/avoid a road is a good one to get. The Nuvi 200 really is a basic unit and has no Text-to-Speech (which I prefer even though some names are butchered). The 200 also comes with only the lower 48 states (adding Canada can get very expensive), so I would suggest the 250 or 260 (the 260 has TTS). The newer 260W (wide-screen) is probably priced too high right now. As far as ease of use, they all work similarly, but Garmins are probably the easiest and most logical (with Magellan a close second). TomTom will give you many more customizable options, plus has Mapshare (a really great idea). No matter what you decide to get, I'm sure you will be pleased. Just remember that they all have various quirks (even the big, expensive models).
34345
The Forerunner 10 has a quick start manual with photo diagrams and simple graphics. I was able to install and use without any assistance and I am not computer saavy at all. The owners manual and learning center are on-line which I find to be a real bonus--no manuals to file, lose, pile up.
110061
Let me list you some: 1) The price; 6200 is more expensive. 2) 5300 is newer; 3) Sound quality is subjective, but 6200 should be better by its wood sound box. 5300 has plastic sound box.
524533
Let me list you some:1) The price; 6200 is more expensive. 2) 5300 is newer;3) Sound quality is subjective, but 6200 should be better by its wood sound box. 5300 has plastic sound box.
1602289
at least one big difference is the HDMI switching. 6200 is the winner hands down. 5200 is pass through without sound as I understand it.
1076552
I LOVE mine and I haven't even completely learned all of it's features. I chose it because my running coach (who also does tri's) has it and I knew that she could help me. I believe it would be a good choice, unless the mountain areas are poor GPS locations. Other than that, I recommend it!
1000795
I hope someone replies to this post cuz I have the same question. I'm eyeing the 205 and 305 too. I'm not a marathoner or bike enthusiast, just a runner who might like the HR function added to my data points. I wonder how many use the HR monitor with the 305 consistently or does it end up in a drawer after a while.
1065292
If you are just running and nothing else the 620 might suit you. The Fenix 2 has just about all of the running functionality as the 620 and can do nice other aspects like the multisport. I did not need the wi-fi if yhe 620 but wanted the running, hiking and other sport aspects. Loving the Fenix 2. If i was only road running i would get the 620. Cheers. Can't comment on Ambit2 sorry. I prefer the Garmin ease of use.
1687266
Thank you for your interest. This sale is for Premium HRM. The one that is beind sold for 99$ is the HRM-RUN. The new belf of Garmin that comes in the Fenix 2 and FR 620 only.
810607
I am in the same boat. I found that the 1200 is the "newest" model of it... And don't like it. The 1400 looks slick, but doesn't have too good of reviews. Did you find anything since then? I see you posted in Jan. :)
825824
Make sure you are not getting Windows XP as the operating system. It has to be At least Windows 7 or 8. Also make sure you get a bonifide Dell battery because the refurbished systems may be great, but the batteries are probably well used and awful. Also I think the bigger battery the better (like the one with 9 volts.) The three of these 620s that I have gotten have been great (though they had Windows XP which now makes them porous as Microsoft no longer supports XP) but I learned that I had to buy the extra batteries. They were all for African Students in Tanzania, and they have really been a good buy. But definitely not with Windows XP.
1758738
The HRM run is built into the HeartRate monitor. You need to have the package that includes both a heart rate monitor and the watch. When you download to Garmin connect you can see the oscillation on the chart with your range showing normal. You can see where On garmin connect your steps change.It's not super scientific but is interesting to see.Also check out the new fenix 2 before you buy the 620. It looks very impressive and the same price.
234614
From what I experience, I bougth the base model without the heart rate mnitor. So you can bay with or without, but there is a price differnce. My case, $400 with out and $440 with the monitor. Please be sure in the description specifies with or w/o.
880293
You would need a different model. The FR10 does not measure heart rate. I enjoy my Garmin FR410, which comes with or without a heart rate monitor. Some people don't like the touch bezel of the 410, but I don't have a problem with it. The Garmin 610 is a step up from the 410. It has an way to navigate touch screen, but the price is $399. I've researched these a lot and would stick with Garmin. Regardless of which Garmin you have, all of these sync with Garmin Connect. The amount of information given is impressive. After a run, all data can easily be synced to Garmin Connect. You can view a map of your workout, mile splits, and weather conditions. I don't even keep a running log anymore because I look on the calendar function Garmin has. You can also look at data for custom dates or pick a given time frame such as last week, last month, last year. If you have a Costco membership they sell the 410 near the jewelry, and if you don't like it jut return it, no questions asked! I'd be happy to answer any other questions. Let me know what you decide on!