do these have compression short liner?
241258
They have a liner, but it's not compression, though it fits snug to your legs.
241259
They are not exactly compression. They work very well to protect the crotch rubbing of the skin and the same shorts with skin and avoid burns when training. If they are snug, but not so much as a compression.
653580
I had not thought of them as compression socks, but in a way they are a light compression because the upper sock retains its hug on your calf nicely, unlike some discount socks that stretch out quickly so you have to tug them up your leg and back in place after a while. The foot portion is not as 'huggy', but it holds its shape and position on your foot nicely. They are very comfortable!
786947
Yes - they have a black oval pad on the back at the bottom (on the heel). I've been using these for a while and find them wonderful !
40173
They are sized correctly. If you are an I'm between size I would go down as you want maximum compression. Hope that helps
1075904
Yes, they should come with light wool liners which work quite well. IF you get below zero though, and need more warmth, look at the Fox River's Double Ragg mittens [Amazon]. They slide right into these and are awesome for warmth.
872894
No, they don't come with a liner (not padded), but you can buy one separate and there is plenty of room to wear underneath. I recommend the Fox Launch shorts.
1529592
Yes they are but not the kind of compression that requires 2 people to put on & off. I bought large just becaue I didn't want to deal with that & these really fit the bill, they give support, they give relief & best of all I can actually put them on myself & they don't cut off circulation @ the knee cap. I love them, they are not PRETTY, but they do the job & I would never take a long trip by car or plane without wearing them & they don't make your skin sweat or itch. Highly recommend
2268325
No, they do not - neither the tops nor the bottoms. This might be different in other Frogg Toggs, but the FT's I purchased do not. I can say they are ideal for staying dry, and although they are EXTREMELY light weight and might make some think they are lower quality - I say they are ideal for the purpose. Don't go rock climbing in them! They are not meant for that! Hope that helps!
364754
Home Run for you. They have a zippered fly with button at waist, easy zipper. There is no mesh liner in the front or back of the shorts, only behind the pockets.
407178
According to rep I emailed at the company: "No, the UA EVO ColdGear Compression Leggings Bottoms do not have UPF protection." They include that sort of info as a bullet point under "The Fundementals" on the product page (apparently).
519288
Not that I could find. I have been happy with Dr. Schols (sp?) light compression socks from Walmart. they are cheaper, too.
77847
Am not sure about that. If you are able to get these, they are great. Maybe you could go on-line and check out the Husky Liners site to find out.
24370
They have side pockets that zip close, but no back pocket. I'm 6' and they barely break on the front of my foot.
610570
Usually they do. However, my old pair just dangled there after alot of use and wear. Or just one side drooped down.
66795
No, they do not. The front pockets are mesh lined and somewhat shallow. However, the rear pockets are velcro along with the pocket on the right thigh. The left thigh pocket is zippered. Great pair of shorts none-the-less.
311097
Yes... Just so you know, they are also categorized under compression mock as well. Just with a "neat" name provided by Under Armour, as all brands do.I used them underneath shirts on a temperature of 05Celsius to 15Celsius.
661912
no, they try to not compress the feet or calves. They still stay up pretty well and are very comfortable.