What would be faster this card or the ASUS GeForce 210 1GB 64-bit DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 Low Profile Ready Video Card, EN210 SILENT/DI/1GD3/V2(LP) What would be faster this card or the ASUS GeForce 210 1GB 64-bit DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 Low Profile Ready Video Card, EN210... » Read More What would be faster this card or the ASUS GeForce 210 1GB 64-bit DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 Low Profile Ready Video Card, EN210 SILENT/DI/1GD3/V2(LP) « Show Less
1130649
The ASUS has a RAMDAC: 400 MHz, AMD radeon has a 650MHz which you can software overclock, which I don't recommend unless you have a 450 watt P.S. It's not really a gaming card, but it works ok, great with picture and movie editing..
1130650
It all depends on what you willcuse it for. If it is for gaming I would use the Asus GeForce. The XFX AMD Radeon tends to over heat.
786299
The particular one I purchased is 64 bit with pci express 16. I slapped an ati 6350 512mb low profile card in it and installed Windows 7 pro 64 bit and it runs like a dream. 2Nd one I've bought. Good running little machines for light gaming and surfing the net.
21051
In this case I'd say 780 To is the fastest overall. The r9 290x is second and 780 lightning comes last. However just keep in mind that all 3 are more than capable of handling anything being thrown at them at 1080p. Also the r9 290x will handle higher resolutions better overall dye to its higher vram
1408501
If you go to this link. http://www.evga.com/Products/ProductList.aspx?type=0&family=GeForce+700+Series+Family&chipset=GTX+770 it lists all the 770's in order of speed & memory, starting with their water cooled Classified Hydro Copper. Then the regular Classified. Then FTW. The EVGA GTX Dual SC is the best of the 2 GB Cards, but is slower than the FTW out of the box.
190781
Depends on a few things: number of slots you have for either PCI or PCI express, your personal appeal for the look of your internals, if you are going to need another slot for some other upgrade, and speed. My motherboard only had the PCI Express slot available, so that was my choice. The express generally grants you the higher speeds, but no guarantee if you have an older/slower router.
2070825
My mainboard is PCI Express Version 1 and this graphics card fits and runs perfectly. My Windows Experience Index improved by 38.8% matching my processor and memory indices. My power supply is 500 watts. Video editing times have been greatly improved with this new graphics card.
693475
Assuming you mean the "EVGA GeForce GTX 770 Dual SC w/ EVGA ACX Cooler" aka PN 02G-P4-2776-KRhttp://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=02G-P4-2776-KRThen it depends... but generally speaking 'yes'.This card is a "EVGA GeForce GTX 770 4GB Dual Classified w/ EVGA ACX Cooler" aka PN 04G-P4-3778-KRhttp://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=04G-P4-3778-KRIt has 4GB of memory instead of 2GB, and the Texture Fill Rate is slightly faster.However it uses more power.Everything else is basically the same.
190786
You need to get the one that will fit into the l slots on your motherboard. If you have both types, I'd go with the PCI-X which is a faster bus. I chose the PCI card because that's all I had in the older PC I was buying it for.
439279
Not this one but the UD3 I have. It required it to be in the PCI-E x16 1 and 2 slots. Dominant card in 1. That was back when I used the HD 6850's now using a R7 260x and moving up to a R9. Still only using 16GB at 1600 MHz but also pushing a FX 9590 at stock 4.7 GHz. I was considering using a UD7 for my next build but probably will just use the newest UD3. I have had it for 4 years and it works great. But it is the 1.0 ( newest is 4.0) so I really need to update it to get max performance. Researching now for other options.
39017
There's absolutely no performance decrease between PCIe's 2 and 3, so you're in luck! :)
389876
I asked Amazon and this was their response: looked up the AX51-9300BK and found the video graphics card is 1.5GB GDDR5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX I'm assuming it's the GTX660. If not then I'm going to return it too because the product information is confusing listing different model cards for the same item. They don't know when it will be in stock either, could be 5 days, could be a month.
317251
Personally. I would say stay with you EVGA gf GTX660 s2 than upgrading to the 760. However, Overall yes its better but the bump you get from it is like going from a 3ghz processor to a 3.5ghz processor. On paper ya its faster. Its better. But will you notice it right now in games. Probably not. I would wait for the next generation cards. IE the Geforce 860(dunno if thats gonna be the name but you follow what im saying) or even the 960. I went from the EVGA GTX 460 to this. So, dunno if this helps but thats my 2 cents worth.
1012599
I am looking to upgrade my old card to use with this board. I won't go past $200 for a single card so the best option might be a GTX660 (Nvidia). I'm sure you can get a better card that won't be bottlenecked, but some people i know who bought this board also bought the GTX560 series cards. Hope I helped.
177647
Hello, x16 means the pin configuration (pci x8 means 8 pins, x16 means 16 pins). The difference between PCI-E 2.0 vs. PCI-E 3.0 is the difference in throughput: Per lane, in each direction:v1.x: 250 MB/s (2.5 GT/s)v2.x: 500 MB/s (5 GT/s)v3.0: 985 MB/s (8 GT/s)v4.0: 1969 MB/s (16 GT/s)For a 16-lane slot, in each direction:v1.x: 4 GB/s (40 GT/s)v2.x: 8 GB/s (80 GT/s)v3.0: 15.75 GB/s (128 GT/s)v4.0: 31.51 GB/s (256 GT/s)
2063245
I'm not sure as this link here will show you it says its not low profile...I do know it is a very good card that fit perfectly in my 300 watt system and runs smoothly...Go to your manufactures website (dell, hp, etc) and search your model number and look under parts regarding video cards, it should list the type of card you can use with your system and then just google search the cheapest card...But as the other posters have said, if you have an extra slot next to your pci express 2.0 then yes it should work...Good luck and reply back your results please...http://tinyurl.com/btv4lzt
868813
PCI Express 2.0 slots are subjected to sustain up to a maximum of 150 watts, and PCI Express 1.1 slots can sustain only 75 watts, The Zotac GTX 650 1 GB. draws about 64 WATTS [the card itself]. Recommended PSU Wattage is 350-Watts. See http://www.hwcompare.com/13468/geforce-gtx-650-vs-radeon-hd-7750/ also see http://www.zotacusa.com/geforce-gtx-650-zt-61001-10m.html The card is Slot 1.1 compatible -- but only as far as wattage drawn from the slot is concerned. You will take a very small hit on performance due to bandwidth limitations but you really will not notice it. Yes it can go into a PCIE slot 1.1. If you have PCI 2.0 slots you might consider another card. If it is a low profile slot then a Low profile card is required. For a faster LP card Slot PCIE2 or PCIE3 -- the Zotac 650 Ti low profile card see below.... see http://www.scan.co.uk/products/2gb-zotac-gtx-650-ti-amp-edition-28nm-pcie-30-(x16)-6200mhz-gddr5-gpu-1033mhz-cores-768-dvi-hdmi This is a PCIE slot 2 card and is 40% faster. It will exceed the wattage of 64 watts by 40% or more as in has 2 gb of ram and a higher clock speed. More ram sucks more power.
1104483
Sorry I'm so late but the only difference I know is that asus has a 1gb digital memory model whereas the EVGA has 2GB digital memory. Hope this helps for future references.