how does it compare with fujitsu sv600?
1145562
Hello fjb, Although the SV600 and xcanex have many similar features such as page curve correction, automatic page detection and auto scan initiation, it is in our opinion that they serve various segments of users with different needs and priorities. Here are some facts that may help: The SV600: - Larger scan area -Scan sheet documents up to A3 size (the xcanex scans up to A4) - Scan 2 book pages simultaneously up to single page size of A4 (A3 for both pages) - the xcanex scans 2 pages simultaneously up to A5 (A4 for both pages), but A4 sized pages are scanned 1 page at a time (left-side pages first, followed by right-side pages, or vice versa) - Higher scan resolution-Scan resolution of up to 600 dpi (typically good for scanning text characters with sizes down to 0.5mm or 0.02 inch) - xcanex has scan resolution of up to 300dpi (typically good for scanning text characters with sizes down to 1mm, or 0.04 inch) The xcanex: - Portable/outdoor use- weight: 7 ounces, thickness &lt;0.8 inch, USB bus powered - Does not require desk space or storage (when integrated with laptop), easy storage after use (when mounted on stand) - Automatic finger image removal (book and sheet document) - Allows flattening of crumpled/folded sheet document using fingers during scan - No mechanical motion during scan - quiet and no mechanical aging - Low power consumption: &lt;2.5 W during operation - Affordable for personal use Here's a Dropbox download link to a scan example (footnote with character size of 1mm) done with the xcanex : https://www.dropbox.com/s/npm7bx861z7xq3d/text%20footnote%20scan%20example.pdf We saved the scan as a PDF OCR file - you can copy and paste the text into any text editor (e.g. MS-Word) to check the OCR quality. We hope users who have the chance to try both scanners could provide more information and opinions. If you have any query on the xcanex, do feel free to write to us at yourfriend@piqximaging.com. Thanks for your interest! piQx Team
1660767
Seems to be close to the 8500. The specs show it to be slightly slower if I recall correctly.
2075561
It did not work neither on my Fujitsu C2220 nor on my Dell Precision 4440; I tried three Hard drives, from 20GB to 80GB (also Travelstar by Hitachi) and none of them was detected on my laptops. Virtually garbage, although I have read some reviews claiming that it works sometimes. I would suggest you to buy an analogous thing of "Sabrent" brand at Wal-Mart online (it costs may be just about $7, free delivery to the store if you have one nearby, and it works perfectly with my laptops). Hope this helps.
111190
nothing else http://www.fujitsu.com/global/services/computing/peripheral/scanners/tech/ps-capture/
665739
I checked the specifications on the Fujitsu website, the data sheet says it has a capacity of ten pages. No information as to how it drops out the other end, but my guess is the pages just pile up.
1760259
Thanks John. I bought the machine with two 2.8 ghz, 2 gb ram 320 gb hard drive, superdrive, airport, etc. I plan on purchasing extra RAM online, maybe at B&H.; I will hook up external harddrives for more storage for the present, eventually getting more hard-drives. I don't really understand the whole RAID discussion. As for screens, after a lot of research, I went for the NEC 2080Wuxi2 with the software. I think the LaCie seems just as good, the Eizo reputedly better, but I want some screen space. THe B&H; store has custom set-ups for photography. One thing they have is blue-tooth which seems absent hereThanks again. Thanks John. I bought the machine with two 2.8 ghz, 2 gb ram 320 gb hard drive, superdrive, airport, etc. I plan on purchasing extra RAM online, maybe at B&H.; I will hook up external harddrives for more storage for the present, eventually getting more hard-drives. I don't really understand the whole RAID discussion. As for screens, after a lot of research, I went for the NEC 2080Wuxi2 with the software. I think the LaCie seems just as good, the Eizo reputedly better, but I want some screen space. THe B&H; store has custom set-ups for photography. One thing they have is blue-tooth which... » Read More Thanks John. I bought the machine with two 2.8 ghz, 2 gb ram 320 gb hard drive, superdrive, airport, etc. I plan on purchasing extra RAM online, maybe at B&H.; I will hook up external harddrives for more storage for the present, eventually getting more hard-drives. I don't really understand the whole RAID discussion. As for screens, after a lot of research, I went for the NEC 2080Wuxi2 with the software. I think the LaCie seems just as good, the Eizo reputedly better, but I want some screen space. THe B&H; store has custom set-ups for photography. One thing they have is blue-tooth which seems absent hereThanks again. « Show Less
1994642
Hi Sean, Sorry It took so long. I had to ask Fujitsu to Answer this Question. I have no personal experience with that scanner so I had to do a little research. Here are a few things I found SV600 vs Xcanex Up 1200dpi vs 300dpi 11x17 max vs Letter max CCD optics vs CMOS Currently supports MAC vs support sometime in 2014 Another thing I noticed is when book scanning the Xcanex can only do one side at a time. We can do both sides in a single scan and our software flattens out any curves and skews. Thanks Anthony J Argy Sr Full Color Copier Inc.
1199465
I have never used the Fujitsu but currently have a scanner made by Brother. The Brother is much sturdier and user friendly. As a side note, my Kodak would not work with Windows 8/8.1 (even though I downloaded the updated driver from the website). When I needed help from the Kodak Tech support to assist with my problem, they wanted to charge me an outrageous fee. It was cheaper for me to buy a new scanner. (Brother does not charge for tech support.) I will never buy another Kodak product.
1134679
I have both the S1500M as well as the S1300. I can attest that both work well on a mac, the quality of the scan seems to be very good [and equal between the two models]. The software is quite customizable and capable, including the ability to scan to a network drive, google docs, etc... However, I can verify the comment from 'Desalegn' above, who indicated that the 1300 is slower. It is A LOT slower. If speed is any concern for you, then I would recommend the 1500 variety. The additional size of the 1500 is not that significant when compared with the 1300, unless you actually plan on lugging the scanner around with you. The other benefit of the 1300 is that it can be powered via the USB port on your computer, and the 1500 cannot. This is a big deal for the traveling office. If you are trying to decide between the two models, it is really an issue of portability. If you are traveling and need a scanner to go with you to do some light volume imaging, you will be happy with the 1300. If you are going to use it on a desk, you will be much happier with the 1500. The 1500 can be moved around without too much trouble, just not in a laptop bag like the 1300. Moving the 1500 between offices once in awhile won't cause much distress, and the speed of the scanning will make the trouble more than worthwhile, but you're not going to travel with it on a business trip.
638282
BizTraveler -- can you also tell me whether the 120 is cool and quiet? I've heard that the NC10 scores high on both accounts. And, after owning a couple of hot, noisy laptops, it's a priority for me. Thanks!
768725
I'm on the same wagon, i'm gonna get one of this next month, but i haven't decided yet. I like the 1201N more than the UL20A for a simple reason, everything that is going out in computer world is graphics intense, CPU is less needed everyday, and for the task that need CPU power the one in the 1201N is enough.
1773389
I am not familiar with the Fujitsu T732...that is a question for the seller. Thank you
1418096
This link might helphttp://www.documentsnap.com/fujitsu-scansnap-how-are-the-s1300-and-scansnap-s1500-models-different/
733974
I'm running about 15 servers off two ESXi hosts with it right now. All my apps are pretty snappy, login times, bootup times, all good. I'm not doing any production with it, but I'm fairly sure this could handle a small business without any problems. It does both NFS and iSCSI, so I have both set up. It can do jumbo frames, vlan tagging, iSNS, thin provisioned luns, lun snapshots. You won't regret this purchase for your lab.
220502
Whoops meant to say I have an hp 6500 and also hp 8500. I much prefer the scansnap.
2231177
http://www.fujitsu.com/global/support/computing/peripheral/scanners/drivers/fi-4x20c2.html
1226905
I actually returned it - it was barely bigger than a paper towel roll if I remember. I ended up getting a Fujitsu ScanSnap s1300i and am very pleased with it. A little more expensive, but excellent scans, it's fast, and the multi-sheet feeder is convenient.