What about vignetting on my wide angle 10 24 Nikon lens? Do I need to get a thin?
1115402
I don't own that lens, but from some reading around it appears that regular filters are fine; however, I will make note that circular polarizers on a wide angle will produce very strange results due to uneven polarization. That may or may not be a concern depending if you want to use it for creative effect.
1115403
I don't believe you do - I get no vignetting on my Tokina 12-28 at 12mm on my DX3200 at all, not even a trace. Just make sure it's the only filter on the lens when in use, and you should be fine. :)To be perfectly frank, I'm not sure how I'd manage a thin version - the turn ring on this one is about as fine and thin as I can easily manage. Anything thinner and I suspect I'd be fumbling at times.
1115404
I don't believe you do - I get no vignetting on my Tokina 12-28 at 12mm on my DX3200 at all, not even a trace. Just make sure it's the only filter on the lens when in use, and you should be fine. :) To be perfectly frank, I'm not sure how I'd manage a thin version - the turn ring on this one is about as fine and thin as I can easily manage. Anything thinner and I suspect I'd be fumbling at times.
630851
I use regular thickness filter - and have not had issues with vignetting. I am using the D300s so DX sensor may not be at risk as much. I do not have a FX sensor body so cannot say. Overall, the VR seems to help a great deal in low light situations.
746652
I've owned both the Polarizer and 010M filter for the Canon 24-105 MM and can guarantee you will see vignetting at 24mm with the Polarizer and a slight darkening with the 010M (UV) filters. The slim filters are the way to go if you're going to be shooting anything at below 28mm. The B&W site goes into a bit more detail on what length vignetting becomes an issue but in my experiments with the 24-105 anything below 35mm using the Polarizer will vignette. If you're not planning on stacking filters (which is generally a bad idea with L glass anyway) I'd go with the thin filters and just change them out as needed. I leave the Slim Polarizer on my 17-40 mm about 85% of the time.
1053386
No. This is a true Nikon hood. I can't answer to using with a filter, but there is no vignetting with the hood at any focal point.
1382943
If the ring size is the same, then yes. Being that you're using an ultra wide lens you might get a vignette. I use it for my 17-44mm. At 17mm I have a tiny vignette (nothing crazy).
1270011
You must make some adjustment to your ISO. if you use this lens indoor on D50 u must a tripod to avoid camera shake, and you can use lower speed. or you set your camera`s ISO to the higher. just experiment first. try not to stopped down the lens as this will give your photo vignetting...dark edges. its really trick to use but once you get the hang of it it`ll be a doddle to use...you've got to be patient otherwise switch to Nikkor Fishye lens or Tamron or Sigma.
642636
I'm guessing you mean a 'thin mount' filter? The only reason to use a thin mount filter would be to avoid vignetting. I have not used a filter with this lens at all. Unless I absolutely have to have one, I stay away from anything but the actual lens glass itself. Occasionally (very occasionally) I'll put a CPL on, but that is about the only case.
88042
I bought this specifically so I can use it with that lens which I plan to buy soon. Though I do not have the actual lens right now, I believe it will not cause vignetting because the glass is much larger than the 82mm ring size. Its actually offset a bit to avoid vignetting
953736
No it does not. I've used it on my Nikon 80-400VR 4.5 and my now 800mm shots are clear with no vignetting. Hope this helps....Ron
516477
Depends on the camera and lens you attach it to. I have a Nikon D7000 and there is vignetting when attached to a wider angle lens, I'd say anything wider than 35mm. I put this attachment on my 35mm prime lens and there is no noticeable vignetting. It is worth the price to play around. I appreciate the Macro aspect of it the most.
2100404
I have the "Regular" B&W UV filter on my Canon 10-22 with no vignetting. I took 2 shots for you off my deck. The first one has no filter; the second one has the regular B&H UV fiter. OOPS! There is no way to attach files to this reply. Give me a few minutes and then go to my web site for the pix: http://michaelsimonds.com Look for "Test Shots." Good imaging to you!
1957943
Yes, but I had to add some foam rubber (side and bottom) to align the lens and the camera portal. If the lens is not centered, it will vignette.
1869388
Assuming you have a 58mm lens, yes. However if your lens is 18mm you will get slight vignetting despite what they claim
788437
Mine works in continuos auto focus on both my D800E and D4. Yes it has a bit of vignetting wide open. A couple stops down not so much.
1640432
Vignetting (that black ring) will occur unless you zoom in far enough to avoid it, especially if you mount a smaller lens over top of a larger lens. It's just how things go. If you want to minimize vignetting then your best bet is to mount lenses of the same size or larger than the lens beneath it.
630853
You have a superb, professional quality lens. I'm old school, and believe filters should match the quality of the glass. Hence, I use B & W regular neutral density filter. I'm away from my office, and can't give you all the details off the box. I haven't found a thin filter is necessary for what I do with this lens--principally interior and exterior shots of buildings and their details with a Nikon D700 at complete range of F stops and focus lengths. Good luck with your shooting.
751770
I've used it on mine and it works, but it was optimized for APS-C sensors, so the corners might get wonky. "The phoblographer" website also verifies this in their testing of the lens. I've noticed little to no vignetting on my photos though.