What is the difference between WP-360W and WP-100?
1147679
The wp-100 has a larger tank for water and is more convenient to use. I have the wp360w, I don't recommend this because the battery should be charge almost 24/7 and has a spraying time of only 30 seconds.
1147680
i had to return the waterpik because it broke on me-at first i would recommend to order this online but is best not to
1277020
Thanks for the info! I was really curious to know what the difference was between the two and could never get an answer that made any sense, until now. I went ahead and ordered the W, and I'm very pleased so far.
1704535
No. There are multiple packages. The WP 450 is a cordless version and while big, can be used for travel. The package shown is not the package with the WP450. It has a smaller reservoir type unit that they call a travel unit but it is way too cumbersome. I thought I was ordering the package with the WP-450 based on the description on the Amazon site but they shipped the one attached. Don't be misled.
110487
I did an online chat with Philips support asking this exact question (after being surprised that Google could not help me!).There is no difference between HTL9100 and HTL7180.They are just different model #'s for different regions. The HTL9100 is the UK model, and HTL7180 is the USA model. Apparently any Philips product with a "/F7" at the end of the model number is the USA region's model.
957597
Here is the comparison page from Oppo's website: http://www.oppodigital.com/dv981hd/dv981hd_comp.html The main advantage of the 981 is the Faroudja chip, which delivers better-quality upscaling on non-DLP displays. The 981 also offers better-quality PAL-&gt;NTSC conversion than Oppo's other two models. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the other two models offer a lot of additional features (I wish my 981 had a memory-stick or USB input!). However, since you have a DLP, you probably want to get the 980 anyway (as the chart indicates). The Faroudja has a notorious "macroblocking" problem when used in conjunction with a lot of DLP displays.
1358572
WP-450W/WP50C I think the difference in some of the models is the type and number of tips that comes with it.
1160642
Sorry, I don't know. I just know that the one I got and I don't even know whether it is 9300 or 9309W is very good and I am totally satisfied.
601528
I want to know the same thing. I would like to try the Bluetooth, provided the 265W is as good and reliable, and has as good reviews as the 255W. Anyone had bad experiences with the 265W?Thanks,Gary
996341
The box says "install on up to 3PCs." I'm the only WP user, so I didn't think about multiple usage.
1582170
not sure? I have the wf3520. Was of very poor quality. I will never buy them again.
219630
In asking other people when I was shopping I found that the 300 is the latest model. Some said the 100 took too long to charge devices. Good Luck.
836707
I am interested in knowing this answer as well. $100 difference in price but I don't see very little difference in features.
1924132
I have the WP 100. Had a hard time finding them in stores like CVS; Bed,Bath&Beyone; etc. hence ordered through Amazon. Best to verify with Waterpik on line.
904870
There are not many differences, really. The FI8906W has a longer antenna with better wireless performance and an improved housing and mounting bracket. The FI8906W comes with a 4mm lens providing a 54 degree field of view whereas the original FI8905W used to come with a 30 degree field of view, so when first introduced the FI8906 provided a wider viewing angle, but several people have said that the FI8905W now comes with a 54 degree field of view as well. That said, you are left with the following benefits of the FI8906W: Better antenna, better case, overall newer external design with effectively same electronics and software. My opinion is stay away from the FI8904 though (not that you asked) as I replaced mine with the FI8906 because the FI8904 did not have nearly the IR (nighttime) illumination capabilities as the FI8905 & FI8906.
2247456
The primary difference is that the WF-2540 has a wire ethernet interface in addition to USB and WiFi. The only other differences (according to the Epson website) are: * WF-2540 has a better LCD screen (2-line, mono text LCD for the WF-2530 vs 2.5" LCD for the WF-2540) * WF-2540 draws more energy (14 W vs 9 W for the WF-2530 - this one baffles me unless the LCD screen and Ethernet port really eat up a lot of energy... )
792516
I'm in the same boat. Both of them have similar features. The Sony W80 has a longer battery life and higher ISO rating, however it uses memory sticks (I already have SD cards, why go out of my way to get a memory stick?). The SD1000 is smaller than the W80. Also, you can zoom in using the camcorder feature in the cannon, that cannot be done with the sony. It all lies on what you consider more important.
1620523
not much difference. its the same thing. the reason why EP100 isn't listed is because it is a new product and will soon be posted on their website when a new software update is available for the device.