what is the difference between the Wahl 7367-500 and the Wahl 7367-200 ?
1145603
My guess is one comes with the nose trimmer and the the other is just the shaver only. Mine was so poorly made I switched to a Panasonic ES-LT41-K which is a great electric shaver, the Wahl was not. The Panasonic will not shave while plugged but it will work for a full shave after only 5 minutes of charging. I got mine on eBay, but check Amazon for sales, too. Good luck, Marty Wisner
1145604
I don't know anything about the 200 but the 500 is very good for removing hair.
1145605
300 Not really any difference as far as function, they changed the style and look.
1145606
Sorry I have no idea. Read the description of both would be a start perhaps.
1653349
They look the same. The descriptions are the same for both. Unless the wattage is different on the 3106Q from that in the Featherweight I'd say they're identical.
2282192
Comparison between 7310xl and 7340xl:http://shavenewworld.com/2010/06/dual-review-norelco-7310xl-7340xl/
2221335
The 732-500 model is measured at 12" x 24" and 731-500 is 12" x15". Both have a sponge insert for moist heat. The 756-500 is 12" x 15" and does not include the sponge. That is the only notable difference I could find when I compared models on sunbeam's website.
760443
This is from another user and it is correct. DW735X 13" vs DW734 12.5" 22 days ago There are several differences. The 734 is a lower end machine that is like the Delta, Ridgid and several other similar models. It does have three cutters versus two for the other ones, which is a plus. It has a capacity that is 1/2 longer, which is a slight plus. It has a more efficient dust removal system which includes a fan to blow out the dust. It is an overall beefier machine that is designed for more of a semi-pro environment. It also has two feed speeds, which is nice for rough work and for finish work. For me, the biggest plus, and the deciding factor, was that I could buy professional quality carbide knives for the 735. Not that I cut so much wood, but carbide lasts forever and just works so much better than the disposable steel blades. Show Less 22 days ago by Arnie Berger I think you would be happier with the 735 dhildebrand
1922372
I am not sure but if you look at the blades in your Wahl 5 stars legend do they look the same as these do? Here are the measurements for this replacement blade set. Larger blade is 4.5 x 4 cm it has a bevel on the inside 1cm long the whole length of the blade. The smaller blade is 4 x 2.25 cm you need to remove the screws to see and measure it.
2265402
The FR 700 and FR 650 look alike but have different features. I ordered the 700 but received the 650 which is a less expensive unit with less features. No explanation yet from Amazon why this happened. Regardless, it's not good advertising for Amazon.
1577991
The only difference in the 2 heads is that the 701 is more of a traditional sliding plate design. The 500 has a new "drop-in" design that is supposedly faster. The feet and monopod part of each model are the same. I have the 701 because the 500 wan't released yet and I love it. My entire setup revolves around the sliding plates.
9184
The only deifference between the two honestly is a "Paint-job", same blade, same motor, different finish!! They both perform outstanding!!! Because of these trimmers I changed all my main trimmers from Andis to Wahl...
264682
The MS-500 is better than the MS-600, but was discontinued years ago. As to why a reputable merchant would advertise one product intending to ship another ...
2215728
Yes it is the same as the standard 735. As to the ware on the blades - I've planed over 300bf in the 6 years that I've had this unit. I missed a label staple on the end of a board and now have a 1/32nd hairline strip that shows and I easily clean up with a scraper. I also purchased an extra set of HSS (high speed steel) knives and put the money out ($158 for the set) for carbide edged which I only use on the last phase of the construction. I've got an older 13" planer that I use strictly for rough plane jobs and paint and varnish removal when I recycle older woodwork.
2233476
Hi Lynn, the only difference is the tools they come with. The 9749w has a 3" Tough Stain Brush, Spraying Crevice Tool, and our Stain Trapper Tool. The 5207a has the same 3" brush and our Deep Reach Pet Tool.
2163340
if you bring up the bosch dds181-102L on amazon search, you'll see that the 102L has only 1 battery and the 02L has two batteries; thus the difference in price.
103314
I am returning the Wahl 79600-2101 Lithium Ion. The 79600 seems very under powered and the blades were not squared. I'm thining and even then it barely cut through 2 weeks worth of growth. I tried to trim my beard, thank God in spite of a balding head I was blessed w/ a nice Viking beard, and using the 79600 was a great let down. I'm sending the Wahl 79600-2101 Lithium Ion back for a refund. Hope to find a better cordless.
1544549
I have no basis of comparison. But for what it's worth, The Wahl 84900 continues to work very well for my wife (who has cut my hair for 50+ years) and myself. It replaced a very, very old Wahl. I have "normal length", old fashioned parted hair that gets cut about every 3 weeks. We do not use the clip-on attachments.
557606
I have both. They are about the same size. The 6302H has a 6.5A motor and it feels like it has much greater torque when driving screws. The 6302H has a metal casting at the front covering the gearbox (where the older 6302 had a plastic piece). The 6302H also comes with a keyed handle, shown in the picture, that grips slots the metal casting and allows two hand control to prevent you losing your grip if the bit binds. If I recall correctly, the older 6302 did not come with a handle, but has threaded holes (in the front plastic piece) for a stabilizer.
66864
Sorry, I can not answer your question. This replacement unit fit my Wahl perfectly. Don't know about any others.