SD4000 versus S95 SD4000 and S90 have been compared numerous times. S90 lacks HD-video and is bigger in size than SD4000, but it has a larger sensor which produces "slightly" better images and it has better manual controls. Some reviewers have mentioned that S90 does not fair as well in auto mode as SD4000, the front ring "free-wheels" sometimes, and the grip is not good.Now that S95 has been announced, it fixes some of those problems - it sports 24fps HD video (arguably not worse than 30fps), claims to fix the ring issue and has a different texture which is supposed to help with the grip. Given these improvements, what do you guys think about SD4000 versus S95 (keeping price out of the equation)? I am about to pull the trigger on SD4000, but the comparison with S95 is holding me back. I will appreciate any input that helps me make the decision. Thanks! SD4000 versus S95 SD4000 and S90 have been compared numerous times. S90 lacks HD-video and is bigger in size than SD4000, but it has a larger sensor which produces "slightly" better... » Read More SD4000 versus S95 SD4000 and S90 have been compared numerous times. S90 lacks HD-video and is bigger in size than SD4000, but it has a larger sensor which produces "slightly" better images and it has better manual controls. Some reviewers have mentioned that S90 does not fair as well in auto mode as SD4000, the front ring "free-wheels" sometimes, and the grip is not good.Now that S95 has been announced, it fixes some of those problems - it sports 24fps HD video (arguably not worse than 30fps), claims to fix the ring issue and has a different texture which is supposed to help with the grip. Given these improvements, what do you guys think about SD4000 versus S95 (keeping price out of the equation)? I am about to pull the trigger on SD4000, but the comparison with S95 is holding me back. I will appreciate any input that helps me make the decision. Thanks! « Show Less
965783
i think s95 is compelling if u want better pictures and control. since s95 has the bigger sensor (better pictures) and the PASM (better control).but really, the 4000 is a true P&S; wif some kick-ass hardware baked in.
2049395
Hi I checked the differance between S2 and S3 for more than a year. and finally I found that S2 is better than S3 with more than hundrad resons some of those are:1.S2 is 5mp which hlep you to use more capacity of SD memory.2.S3 comming without Digital Zooming.3.S2 comming with AA battery but SOME of the S3 models comming with special batteries.4.S2 I saw the quality of the camera case is better than the S3.5.6.7.100.I didn't like S3 at allZayed :)
687247
I'm still shopping, but the deciding factor for me is going to be the wider angle on the S95. The only way I get into photos is to hold the camera at arm's-length, and the difference between 28MM and 36MM makes a big difference to me. Since this is for my wife, where simpler is better, it would be a no-brainer if the SD4500 had the same 28MM-wide lens as the SD4000. Too bad they changed it.By the way, the f2.0 on the wider lenses makes a big difference to me, too. The SD4500 starts at f3.5.I want the better HD video features of the 4500, but will probably get a compact HD video camera for that some time in the future (where I will complain about the photo features ;-) ) I'm still shopping, but the deciding factor for me is going to be the wider angle on the S95. The only way I get into photos is to hold the camera at arm's-length, and the difference between 28MM and 36MM makes a big difference to me. Since this is for my wife, where simpler is better, it would be a no-brainer if the SD4500 had the same 28MM-wide lens as the SD4000. Too bad they changed it.By the way, the f2.0 on the wider lenses makes a big difference to me, too. The SD4500 starts at f3.5.I want the better HD video features of the 4500, but will probably get a... » Read More I'm still shopping, but the deciding factor for me is going to be the wider angle on the S95. The only way I get into photos is to hold the camera at arm's-length, and the difference between 28MM and 36MM makes a big difference to me. Since this is for my wife, where simpler is better, it would be a no-brainer if the SD4500 had the same 28MM-wide lens as the SD4000. Too bad they changed it.By the way, the f2.0 on the wider lenses makes a big difference to me, too. The SD4500 starts at f3.5.I want the better HD video features of the 4500, but will probably get a compact HD video camera for that some time in the future (where I will complain about the photo features ;-) ) « Show Less
687246
The S95 has a wider angle, faster lens, with a larger sensor resulting in sharper images and better low light capabilities. It also has manual controls and raw shooting capability, HDR mode, boost ISO, noise reduction and advanced image stabilization . The SD4500 sacrifices image quality to achieve the larger zoom and 1080p video. The S95 has the best IQ of any point and shoot out there (close to a DSLR) IMHO.
1419974
I am not obsessed with megapixel counts in cameras. I stopped printing sometime ago. My pictures go online or facebook. So I have to give up on the wish for a megazoom in a small package since I won't compromise picture quality for the zoom. I ruled out the S95 because of the zoom range. Now I have to reconsider. Other than the zoom, it still has most of the attributes I am looking for in a small package.Thank you so much for your research on sensor size and lens. This explains what I noticed for some years. My old trusty takes nicer pictures than many people's newer cameras. I am not obsessed with megapixel counts in cameras. I stopped printing sometime ago. My pictures go online or facebook. So I have to give up on the wish for a megazoom in a small package since I won't compromise picture quality for the zoom. I ruled out the S95 because of the zoom range. Now I have to reconsider. Other than the zoom, it still has most of the attributes I am looking for in a small package.Thank you so much for your research on sensor size and lens. This explains what I noticed for some years. My old trusty takes nicer pictures than many people's newer cameras.
565038
Hi Isaabel,I am still loving the S90 and learn something new about it almost every day. It is infinitely adjustable if you like to tinker around (or if you know what you are doing better than I do so far... you might say "use full manual control"). The instant feedback on the very nice LCD screen is helping me learn to be a better photographer. The only thing that is hard to do is create good bokeh effects but I am trying to find internet tutorials that help with this. Also, I can probably address it to some degree in Photoshop Elements or Photoshop (when I get an extra minute!) Good luck with your decision.Heirloom Tomato Hi Isaabel,I am still loving the S90 and learn something new about it almost every day. It is infinitely adjustable if you like to tinker around (or if you know what you are doing better than I do so far... you might say "use full manual control"). The instant feedback on the very nice LCD screen is helping me learn to be a better photographer. The only thing that is hard to do is create good bokeh effects but I am trying to find internet tutorials that help with this. Also, I can probably address it to some degree in Photoshop Elements or Photoshop (when I get an... » Read More Hi Isaabel,I am still loving the S90 and learn something new about it almost every day. It is infinitely adjustable if you like to tinker around (or if you know what you are doing better than I do so far... you might say "use full manual control"). The instant feedback on the very nice LCD screen is helping me learn to be a better photographer. The only thing that is hard to do is create good bokeh effects but I am trying to find internet tutorials that help with this. Also, I can probably address it to some degree in Photoshop Elements or Photoshop (when I get an extra minute!) Good luck with your decision.Heirloom Tomato « Show Less
1198691
As someone who spent months in research (and finally decided on the NIKON) allow me to offer my advice: The NIKON P80 has a new sensor with 10.1MP (size 1/2.33" and a pixel density of 36MP/cm2). On its plus side, the small size (although it turns long when zoomed all in), the comprehensive menu and the overall built. On the minus side, the NIKON, although perfectly capable, will not take the best photo if left on Auto. The PANASONIC FZ18 has an older 8.1MP sensor (size 1/2.5" and a pixel density of 32MP/cm2). On its plus size, the impeccable LEICA lens system (and quite short even at maximum zoom), the handy joystick, the great image quality and the mechanical stabilization (the only one of these three that comes with it). On the minus side, the FZ18 is a bit larger that the P80 - and is bound to be replaced by Christmas. The FUJI S8100FD was never a contender for me. With a 10MP sensor (size 1/2.3" and a pixel density of 35MP/cm2) it is not too shabby. Yet, its overall design was not to my liking at all (of course that is a personal preference). The best advice a professional photographer gave me was this: choose the best lens and then the best sensor. Then make sure it is a camera for your level. The PANASONIC has the best lens whereas the NIKON has the best sensor (these cameras are still Point&Shoot, nowhere near the sensor sizes of a DSLR). Bottom line: if new to digital photography or do not care to be concerned with all the tweaking, go with the PANASONIC - it has a much better intelligent Auto (iA) function. If more experienced or would like to be more involved in taking a photo, go with the NIKON. Happy shooting!
1077277
yes. i was in the same situation. this is the third generation since the s95, which was a great camera that i took all over the world. after the s95 the industry changed from ccd to cmos sensors which are better all around - lower noise (better in low light), better color resolution and fidelity, and 12 vs 10 megapixels. the lens is faster and a little sharper and 5x vs 3x telephoto. you can shoot up to 8 frames per second for action vs about 2 on the s95. also has wifi for immediate upload to your phone, and a touch screen and the screen quality is much better. you should see a substantial improvement in photo quality. yes. i was in the same situation. this is the third generation since the s95, which was a great camera that i took all over the world. after the s95 the industry changed from ccd to cmos sensors which are better all around - lower noise (better in low light), better color resolution and fidelity, and 12 vs 10 megapixels. the lens is faster and a little sharper and 5x vs 3x telephoto. you can shoot up to 8 frames per second for action vs about 2 on the s95. also has wifi for immediate upload to your phone, and a touch screen and the screen quality is much better. you should see a substantial... » Read More yes. i was in the same situation. this is the third generation since the s95, which was a great camera that i took all over the world. after the s95 the industry changed from ccd to cmos sensors which are better all around - lower noise (better in low light), better color resolution and fidelity, and 12 vs 10 megapixels. the lens is faster and a little sharper and 5x vs 3x telephoto. you can shoot up to 8 frames per second for action vs about 2 on the s95. also has wifi for immediate upload to your phone, and a touch screen and the screen quality is much better. you should see a substantial improvement in photo quality. « Show Less
154002
Thank you! I haven't heard of the sx40 i'll check it out. I really like the specs. On the sx230. The images looked better than the Sony hx9 I was gonna get. But the canon seem to beat it with quality of picture. Thanks again
760079
I am an amateur photographer myself and I have both the S95 and the G12. I purchased the G12 to replace my G7 that died. I absolutely LOVE the S95 (the S100 is the newer model) and hate the G12. The picture quality on the S95 is far superior. I take alot of action horse riding photos and the S95 does better. The G12 produces blurry, grainy (when zoomed in) photos. I also don't use all the bells and whistles of the G12. I wish I could purchase the G7-it was a fantastic camera-the G12 disappoints. I hope the S100 is as great as the S95 because I want another one! I hope this helps!
2236560
I spent a lot of time researching and have decided that the wait is worth it (although, unbearable!) The FZ40 is an improvement over the FZ35 as far as startup speed, image quality (not only higher MP, but also a better sensor). The zoom also is worth it to me. If you do some searching, there are a lot of reviews now. The FZ40 also has panoramic, not sure if the FZ35 has that or not.I don't think that the FZ100 is worth the extra 1 hundred. There still is some debate over the quality of the images with the MOS sensor and the 1080 video vs 720 wasn't worth it for me.
1469934
I own both the SX30is and S95. Of course the 95 can do RAW and the 30is can't so that is one thing to take into consideration if you do a lot of Photoshop work. Even with it's fantastic zoom tests (see this test I've posted elsewhere:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C1e05eKoiEI still like the sharpness and versitility of the 90 - and end up using that for most of my friends and neighbors shots, parties etc. Both cameras have their place and Canon has done a great job.I spent many years hauling around an F1 and various lenses. It's so nice to have these two cameras, both of which fit in one bag, to do almost everything my old films SLRs did. I am very pleased. I own both the SX30is and S95. Of course the 95 can do RAW and the 30is can't so that is one thing to take into consideration if you do a lot of Photoshop work. Even with it's fantastic zoom tests (see this test I've posted elsewhere:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C1e05eKoiEI still like the sharpness and versitility of the 90 - and end up using that for most of my friends and neighbors shots, parties etc. Both cameras have their place and Canon has done a great job.I spent many years hauling around an F1 and various lenses. It's so nice to have these two... » Read More I own both the SX30is and S95. Of course the 95 can do RAW and the 30is can't so that is one thing to take into consideration if you do a lot of Photoshop work. Even with it's fantastic zoom tests (see this test I've posted elsewhere:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C1e05eKoiEI still like the sharpness and versitility of the 90 - and end up using that for most of my friends and neighbors shots, parties etc. Both cameras have their place and Canon has done a great job.I spent many years hauling around an F1 and various lenses. It's so nice to have these two cameras, both of which fit in one bag, to do almost everything my old films SLRs did. I am very pleased. « Show Less
1312575
s95 is a great option if you only take up close pictures . When it comes to have the best package for all different activities , the sx230 is the one to go with . I personally prefer the sx230
1257208
You would not get a good answer, here of all places with so many opinionated people.Only recommendation I can give is try both cameras in store and see which once you find comfortable to use. Both are great cameras. And really similar in performance. Can't go wrong either way.I've heard/read that Lumix is slightly better. But I have the S90 and I can't imagine how any P&S; can be better than it (aside from S95/S100) in the same category. I love the controls on it especially the customizable ring.
260133
"better"...can you elaborate a little more? I am ready to listen. If that's the case I should not hesitate to buy s95.
394540
They don't. Both have different use. If you prefer a point-and-shoot, go with the S9500. But if you prefer to be patient with the DP3, you'll be rewarded with amazing image quality for its size.
1469933
Hi Morris. The S95 and S90 are unique. As a subcompact it can be carried in your pocket....SX40 no..no in the pocket. The S95 has incredible low light at wide angle and F2. I used it today to document and help identify some piping in the wall with available light. It was too awkward with the super zoom. This is why you need to bring 2 cameras when traveling. I actually carry 3 including a camcorder which I think is better for video then either super zoom or S95. Many people swear by the DSLR and that works for them