So it sounds like a 70-200mm F2.8 does not fit in this bag correct?
1708238
The bag can carry one mounted lens and an extra lens.I have a 70-200mm F4.0, which is slimmer but I guess has the same length (needs to be verified!), it fits as the second lens. I can't take it while mounted on the camera.I just tried it again now, just to be sure, I can squeeze it in while mounted, but I don't recommend it as it will most likely damage the zipper.
1708239
It should be ok. In my camera compartment I have my Sony a77 and three lenses total: 16-50mm 2.8; 55-200 3.5?; and a fat Rokinon 8mm fisheye.
1708240
Further to my earlier reply, I was referring to the side compartment. No problems fitting it in the main compartment
1708241
Hi, I have a Rebel T2i with a Tamron 18-270 lens. It fits with tons of extra room. I just bought this bag a few months ago. I was a bit worried about it fitting. It's more than enough room. shalom
1708242
That is correct. My 75-300mm fits snuggly but anything bigger than that like the 70-200mm wouldn't fit. It's still a great bag! Hope that helps!
1708243
I have 18-200mm lens atteched to tyhe body and it fits just fine. Its snug and secure in the bag. There is ample space to carry multiple lenses in the other compartments. You would need an additional case to secure the extra item such as a slip cover. The compartment still has possibly 2 inches of space after the camera is housed in the compartment for it. I am not sure which lens you have to give you a definate answer. I have a Canon D7 and Canon lenses. Hope this helps! Good Luck! I do love my bag!
1708244
I have the 70-200mm F2.8 (no IS) and it fits in the bag. I think in my review I only mentioned the 100-400mm and that lens longer. I also had the tripod mount on it when it was in the bag. It will NOT fit with it ON the camera body in the compartment.
1708245
Never tried it but, I have shot with a 70-200 F2.8. My guess is that it will probably not fit, especially if fitted with a full frame pro body. I think a Flipside Sport might work better with that lens.
1944735
It's holds a 24-105 f4 just fine. No other lenses would fit comfortable. In any case you are getting a very vice camera that deserves a much nicer bag.
108247
You might be able to 'cram' all that in, but there would be little room to spare, if any.I use it with a micro-4/3 body and 2 lenses plus spare batteries and charger. Just right for that size gear.Bottom line = look at a larger bag if you want to be comfortable.
1778354
Not exactly sure but I easily fit 5diii, 50 1.2, and 85 1.2. I still have room for one more lens. I keep the 50 1.2 on the camera and that goes in sideways into the main compartment I have created with the dividers. I put it in that way for easy access and keep the lens cap off. The 85 1.2 is in a compartment beside that which also has a small divider that comes with it so that you can stack lenses one on top of the other. Beside that is another divider where I can put the 25-105mm if I want. I can easily fit 3 to 4 lenses in this bag. I am not sure about a 70-200 it would be tight with that.
1841726
Hello. I don't know the size of your equipment. The bag will fit a digital SLR with a 70-200mm lens, which is the biggest I have, and a couple of small, pancake lenses.
1583043
Hi there. I don't have the exact dimensions here, but I carry a D7000 with a 24-70 mounted. There is plenty of space for filters, cards. You can carry 2 medium-sized lenses, like the 24-70, but anything bigger, like a 70-200, I wouldn't recommend. If you have primes, well, you can carry like 4.
1142467
I managed to fit my D700 with a 24-70 in the bag, along with a SB-900 speedlight and a small lens. The D800 shld be about the same size as my D700, so it shld fit.
513702
That lens would be too heavy and expensive to manufacture. You think the 70-200 2.8 II is heavy? That lens would be a beast. The manufacturing design of a lens that has in its range very wide to telephoto is extremely complex at 2.8 max aperture. I don't see it happening in the near to medium future (5 to 10 years) if ever.
1748765
I don't think so. I shoot Nikon and it won't accept my Nikkor 70-200 2.8. I use this for that lens: "Lowepro Lens Case 11 x 26 cm (Black) by Lowepro 21 customer reviews | 4 answered questions List Price: $44.99 Price: $37.50 You Save: $7.49 (17%) In stock on April 19, 2014. Order it now. Sold by Bopo and Fulfilled by Amazon. Fits high-power zoom lenses, similar to 70-200mm f/2.8 Purpose-built, one-piece foam padding construction protects a specific lens size and shape from top to bottom and side to side; sturdy, yet lightweight Built-in SlipLock attachment tab secures the Lens Case to a Lowepro SlipLock compatible bag or pack Removable, adjustable shoulder strap provides an extra carrying option and allows for a custom fit when worn over shoulder or across body Compression strap secures case to a backpack or shoulder bag with daisy chains or loops_
1955732
I have a Canon 75-300mm lens in the case which is slightly under 6" in length. When it is in the extra pouch I purchased for it, it is 7 1/4" in length X 3 ½" in diameter and fits fine upright in the bag. The top of the bag slips amply over the front of the bag and the two straps are adjustable so I would expect that a lens that is 8" to 8 ½" in length would fit and still be secure in the upright position. A lens that is 9 ½" long could fit length wise in the bag or on top of some shorter lenses beneath or vise versa. The partitions inside the bag allow for several arrangements or can be removed as needed. There are no exterior straps made to hold a really long lens in the 12" to 15" length on the outside. I have a Canon 75-300mm lens in the case which is slightly under 6" in length. When it is in the extra pouch I purchased for it, it is 7 1/4" in length X 3 ½" in diameter and fits fine upright in the bag. The top of the bag slips amply over the front of the bag and the two straps are adjustable so I would expect that a lens that is 8" to 8 ½" in length would fit and still be secure in the upright position. A lens that is 9 ½" long could fit length wise in the bag or on top of some shorter lenses beneath or vise versa. The partitions inside the bag allow for... » Read More I have a Canon 75-300mm lens in the case which is slightly under 6" in length. When it is in the extra pouch I purchased for it, it is 7 1/4" in length X 3 ½" in diameter and fits fine upright in the bag. The top of the bag slips amply over the front of the bag and the two straps are adjustable so I would expect that a lens that is 8" to 8 ½" in length would fit and still be secure in the upright position. A lens that is 9 ½" long could fit length wise in the bag or on top of some shorter lenses beneath or vise versa. The partitions inside the bag allow for several arrangements or can be removed as needed. There are no exterior straps made to hold a really long lens in the 12" to 15" length on the outside. « Show Less
1544402
It should, depends on the overall length of the 400mm lens. The Canon 400mm f2.8L will fit in the bag. After that lens though, you might not have much room other gear. I returned mine because I could not get my two bodies, 3 zoom lenses (24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 and 100-400 f4.5-5.6) and my flashes into it. I did get the Airport International instead and all my gear fit with some room to spare.
1079165
While the bag may be adjustable and has great space management, your camera + lens even separately will not fit.
1787254
I have the canon 55-250 usm and it has about an inch extra, the 70-200 looks pretty big so I am not sure
797228
Seeing as I don't know how your bags padding is configured all I can say is that I fit my D7000 with one of my lens attached and the other two next to it. Then in the other opening is where my flash and filters sit. Just treat it like a jigsaw and play around with the padding until you fit it all in or just opt out your least needed lens or the grip (I don't own a grip so I couldn't say how to fit one in). Sorry I couldn't be more helpful, good luck.
1346323
I'm not familiar with that lens, but I can say it holds my 200 with room to spare
455224
I usually carry with me my Canon 5DMk iii, 70-300 EF (kit lens), 24-70 f/2.8 L, a 50mm prime, a few LEE filters and a speed lite 580EXii, they all fit pretty well and I have a little space for my charger, blower, etc.. SO I think it will fit, but am not a Nikon user and I also don't carry the 70-200 lens which is bulkier than the 70-300 EF lens. If you plan on having the 70-200 on the body, then it should ideally fit. I have taken this to several trips and have been more than happy.
1955811
I am not quite sure but I compared your camera and lens measurements to the ones I use, and it seems like it could fit with a possibility of a hassle closing the bag!