Are these pants 65/35 blend or what?
1689151
yes, they are a 65-35 blend. I am one who hates polyester, usually even in blends, these pants are the exception. They are durable, comfortable, and do not chafe. been wearing them to work for a couple of months now and am comfortable all day long. I am in Indiana, so have not experienced summer temps yet, but do not expect any difference.
1689152
They seem to be what they are advertised to be. They are well made and worth every penny I paid for them!!!
1689153
Yes they are 65/35. Mine have been through several washings and continue to look nice. Typically I don't put them in the dryer and the still don't wrinkle. And they do seem to be stain resistant.
343726
Who wants extra care for sweats, so I pop these in the dryer on medium heat. The pants did shrink some (perhaps 1/2") in length. In my grey set the pants were on the short side to begin with. Shrinkage would normally be welcome (I am only 5'4") however the grey sweat pants ran pretty short and are now barely long enough. My navy blue pants are fine but were cut longer at the start. The fit otherwise remains fine after repeated washing and drying. So far they have held up well remaining soft, no pilling, very comfortable. Fabric content on the sets I've received is 60% cotton and 40% polyester. Who wants extra care for sweats, so I pop these in the dryer on medium heat. The pants did shrink some (perhaps 1/2") in length. In my grey set the pants were on the short side to begin with. Shrinkage would normally be welcome (I am only 5'4") however the grey sweat pants ran pretty short and are now barely long enough. My navy blue pants are fine but were cut longer at the start. The fit otherwise remains fine after repeated washing and drying. So far they have held up well remaining soft, no pilling, very comfortable. Fabric content on the sets I've received is 60% cotton and... » Read More Who wants extra care for sweats, so I pop these in the dryer on medium heat. The pants did shrink some (perhaps 1/2") in length. In my grey set the pants were on the short side to begin with. Shrinkage would normally be welcome (I am only 5'4") however the grey sweat pants ran pretty short and are now barely long enough. My navy blue pants are fine but were cut longer at the start. The fit otherwise remains fine after repeated washing and drying. So far they have held up well remaining soft, no pilling, very comfortable. Fabric content on the sets I've received is 60% cotton and 40% polyester. « Show Less
386214
I have not worn them in lower than 40F. Between 50 an 60F, the pants are great! between 40 and 50F, it depends on how long I'm outside in them for, the longer I'm outside in them (more than 2 hrs), the longer I need to thaw out when I get home. Now, to put things in perspective, I live in NC where it does not get super cold like the Midwest, so the slightest cold bothers me. Hope this has helped.
685123
The Tag does say 65/35 cotton/polyester but I find nothing about rip stock material!DLG
1511085
They feel like regular t-shirts, so I'm assuming cotton or a cotton/polyester blend.
359904
The ones I received were 50N/50C. The pattern I bought was ACU Digital, and I received the full-awesome, mil-spec issue trousers in the pattern that is the current battle uniform for the U.S.A. Army forces. That pattern is set to change later this year (summer 2015) so right now is the time to buy if you like that pattern and appreciate true mil-spec quality. Everything is on liquidation sale while the new official pattern is being produced and stocked, as we speak.
286154
Hey, I bought these pants in 34W-32 in tan and they arrived promptly in my mailbox! They're good pants, just a little pricey. Steve P
130884
I just checked mine and the tag reads 100% polyester. I don't know why they advertise as a cotton/poly blend. I like them just fine. I'm just using them for home.
60987
Probably defect... My husband wears a 32 waist in jeans, and he's had two pairs of these pants in a 32 waist that both fit the same... Just a bit roomier than a 32 jean. (He tried to go down to a 30, but that was much too snug.)
1468664
Sorry, got really busy. I just weighed the pants and they came out to 308 grams or 10.86 oz. So both the listed weight and description weight are off. Maybe it's a generic weight for a smaller size?
1191347
I think they are a polyester blend. Very stretchy, not too thin like some of the ones you find at kmart etc.
849254
Probably a cotton poly blend; very soft. I gave these as gifts and don't have them on hand to check labels for fabric content.
64962
I know nothing about material but I would probably call them a Poly/Cotton blend and they feel like a light weight canvas.. I do know that they are rip-stop....and they wear well in all kinds of weather. I especially like them in the Texas summer. They are much more comfortable than blue jeans. I've been wearing them for a couple of years and the oldest ones look as good as the newer ones.
37830
I bought the pants in two different colors: one pair of black, and one pair of indigo [a deep navy blue]--nice color. If the pant is labeled indigo, it is the navy one.
50977
I purchased these pants and gave them as a gift, therefore they are not physically in my home. I recommend you do as I did when I was considering these and go to the Columbia website and reference their size chart. You should have good luck that way. I can tell you that the recipient absolutely LOVES these, we live in MI and have had over 90" of snow!
543592
Sorry, don't know. Safariland's site shows it fits 66 and 68 but doesn't list 65.
991138
Hmmm, maybe large. These pants are great and made in usa I think. I am 5'7", 145, and I have to be very careful that the XL doesn't shrink !!! They have a small concept of large and extra large.