Why a 1.8 k burst disk, if it's 3k?
1717059
The 1.8k burst disk is for the output pressure side, as a failsafe in case the regulator fails. The high pressure disk is the one that would blow if the tank was overfilled.
1717060
The 1.8k is for the output pressure of the tank the other is a 5k burst disk for the total pressure of the tank
1386541
You cant, the drive is a cheap scam. The chip in it tells your computer it has 256gb of storage but in reality it probably has less than 1gb. This scam is successful because most people wont return this and just figure it a loss.
1712097
I am using it with a 3.0Gb drive with a NTFS file system. Works like a charm
1695373
Problems with the 7200.11's are generally caused by crappy firmware that Seagate shipped with early production runs. Current firmware fixes all of those freezing and hanging problems.
1581105
1.5 Gb/s http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=234964 http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Computer/Computer+Drives/BDR-2209
1929995
4 gig is advertised, but after OS overhead, etc., there is only 2.8 gig or so available.
140742
You may have poor performance with that many disks simply because of the processing power required for an array that large. But there is no reason that this wouldn't work. If you're looking for a 16+ drive solution I would suggest something like the 2413+
166153
The documentation states 3TB max. I am running 3TB drives with Mac, USB 3 is slow.
248976
The drive is used for dvd backups and picture storage. When the old drive failed, I purchased another USB 3.0. That didn't help. I recovered almost 1 TB in two days. Then, since I had not yet received the new 3.0 card, I tried using the USB 2.0 to transfer from another backup (a western digital) to the Seagate. In 3 days, I moved about 300 Gb. That was left on 24 hours, too. After I got and installed the new 3.0 (I still doubted the old one), all remaing 500 plus Gb moved in less than 3 hours!. I never measured or recorded the speed. And the old 3.0 USB worked similarly.
694015
From my testing on 2 units these are really 8GB faked to read as 256GB. Formating does not matter, these are FRAUDS!
1666138
I use an internal 1 TB HDD. Never try a 3 TB HDD. It is not a "1080P HD", and I have a fatal problem with it.
213010
to you it looks like 1 drive. The firmware on the drive uses the ssd for the most active files. you don't control that. format the partition and load your os. i think you will like it! I am really very happy with the performance; it is very smooth and very consistent.
145323
My use was on a mill with a Pentium 3 processor running MSDOS 6.21. DOS sees it a Drive A: and all the software treats it the same way. The formatted USB drive when plugged into our Windows 8 desktops only works with the first 1.44 MB partition.
1911583
Yeah, this is seems common, they aren't exactly a "high speed sync" solution. 1/160 seems to be the best speed for reliability
1278225
I can check later when I take it offline. Right now the green disk access light is flashing rapidly indicating a lot of disk activity. In other words, it is currently recording some TV via my Snapstream / Beyond TV recording software. I'll get back to this maybe next week. I do know that it is 7200 RPM.
1195554
5400 is actually better (or at the very least, no worse) than 7200 for large files since the heads spend less time bouncing around the platters trying to find your data. Also once you RAID these, which is what they're designed for, they'll be plenty fast enough that you won't think twice about how fast they spin.
338753
The drive is a 1 TB Hard Drive and not a Solid State Drive. The Cache is SSD.