Generally compared to other printers how fasts are the print performed?
1712052
It depends on how complicated the print is. A 3 inch mustache cutter took about 45 min to print.
1071314
I don't have an actual rate per second for you I apologize. However it's not super fast if you're looking for a high output color printer in large amounts. Especially if you print duplex, it literally feeds the paper back in itself then prints the other side.
373776
Printing to my HLL8350 when printer is in "sleep" mode took 34 seconds before I could pickup a one-side print job. Second print job (while printer was in "normal" mode) took 22 seconds for the same one-sided page. Next I checked my print settings and learned that the first two print jobs were going to the Google Cloud Printer driver; when I print directly to the networked printer the same job that took 22 seconds took 14 seconds.
1899327
No it can not do automatic two-sided printing (duplex printing). If you lower the print quality then it becomes fast. If you max out the quality then it can become dead slow (like many other printers out there I would say that this is normal)... So it's neither fast nor slow. It's hard to give an example to the print quality and the corresponding speed here. Try to find some video reviews to see some examples or take a look at the PPM (page per minute) numbers that could be found over the internet (manufacturer page, review pages, etc.).
1157870
The one I had (has since been thrown away) always had a slow printing/copying speed. I am not a techi-person, but it sounds like it is inherent in this particular make/model. I also had a problem with the print heads which would have been more costly to replace than to just get a whole new unit (which I originally paid big bucks for) so I ultimately just threw it out, sad to say. I had high hopes for this unit, but like so many things like this, they often disappoint. And, it was not overly used or abused either. Sorry I can't tell you more.
1884469
That's the only difference I noticed. This printer is fantastically fast. It is truly the best printer I have ever own or seen. You will love it, I am sure!
1180217
The answer is yes. it also is fast and it works very well. No complaints about this printer after using it four months.
761861
Interesting question. I'm unaware of any specification data related to your question. My un-scientific approach is simply hands on analysis which appears to be around a second per line printed. Of course, if each entry is at the max 12 digits, then a second would be a stretch. It is after all a dot-matrix type of printer (each digit individually printed) as opposed to the heat-transfer type of tape. I would add that I've had several printing desk calculators and this one (Sharp EL-1750V) is comparably no slower than any of the others. Hope this helps.
1302710
I have the printer but use a PC, not a Mac. That scan speed seems extraordinarily slow. My page scans take 30 seconds, if that long. I have a cable connection between the printer and my router.
910870
It has been a very good printer for me. I also own a Makerbot and my computer cannot tell the difference between the two. The flashforge is not though as fancy with extras like Makerbot. It will do the job for sure. I did a 9hr print today and it went well. The service from flashforge is excellent.
1813300
Time to print a page varies, but it is not fast, compared to other printers. Some of the time is used for the printer to "get ready" once the command is given. I printed once or twice a month and the ink was fine. It's the paper handling that is a problem with this printer. 20-24 lb bond paper works fine. Card stock will cause a hiccup.
1223805
I've owned my printer about 5-6 months so far & not had any problems with it. It's small sits on a small table beside my desk. It's fast printing, clear type, no smears,uses a USB port to hookup to the PC. I'd recommend buying it, I'm sure you'll like it as much as I do..
1509870
Like any printer it depends on your usage. I've found that 'regular' printing has been very reasonable.High res photo printing on 'best' setting used more than my last printer but the result was worth it.All in all I recommend getting the printer.
1116952
I purchased this model for one of my offices. The rep in that office who uses it handles most of my commercial contracts/buying agreements so she is printing all day long. Like most Epson products it has performed without a hitch.
215079
Since we bought the printer for our engineering office last October, we have printed 1495 pages, 1116 of which had at least some color content, though only about 150 of those had large color pictures, the rest were mostly black and white drawings with a few color graphics and lines. We are still using the original color toner cartridges that came with the printer, and they are are all 2/3 full. We used up the black starter toner cartridge that came with the printer, plus we have used up about 45% of a TN-221BK black toner cartridge. Brother claims that the TN-221BK cartridge will print 2500 pages, and the TN-225C, M and Y cartridges will print 2200 pages. I paid $283 for a four pack of toner cartridges, one black and three color high-yield Brother brand cartridges. But it looks like I will mostly be buying black toner cartridges at $60 each. While not cheap, it is a heck of a lot cheaper per page than using ink jet printers, plus the printer is faster and quieter than ink jet printers, and the print quality is great. Plus there are no print heads to clog, which eventually killed most of the ink jet printers I've owned. Also, if the toner is not completely used up when the printer says it is you can reset the cartridge and keep printing until the cartridge is empty.
1371873
I've never measured it, but you do get a good number of copies. All printers like this are expensive as to the ink, but I've consistently found Canon to be the most reliable, long lasting, and best printers.
1361921
Not sure I can answer this question well. As I have not done a great volume of printing with this machine yet, but it appears to be pretty decent so far.