What is the difference between this model and the CDN DTQ450X ProAccurate Quick-Read Thermometer?
1702039
Not sure I can answer your Question but this little thermometer is sturdy, accurate and I use it all the time. I've had it a couple of years and it's working great.
1430591
I believe it's just an older model number. I haven't found anything with any difference between the two of them.
1723196
I don't know - mine arrived broken. The return was handled very well but I bought a 'Weber" instead. Quite quick - reads in about 5 to 10 seconds. Has an on/off button and a Farenheit/Centegrade button and a swivel head which is handy to have; (& less $)
1991841
I do not know what is the difference between the two. Maybe one is a older verison (AQ-4000)? Hopefully, someone else can answer the question for you and me. ;-)
2076918
I purchased the RT600C Super-fast Water-resistant Digital Pocket Thermometer (by ThermoWorks, the same company behind Thermapen) 2 years ago and it's been perfectly fine for my home cooking needs. I primarily use it for checking the doneness of meat: steak (130F), turkey (160F), pork (135F), sausage (150-160F), and fish (130F), which is well within the -40 to 302F range. (The Thermapen range is -58.0 to 572.0F). To check frying oil temperatures, I use a candy thermometer that I leave in the pot that gets up to 400F. The response time of the RT600C is officially 5-6 seconds, but it feels almost immediate to me. I haven't overcooked anything due to waiting 3 more seconds than I might with the Thermapen, whose response time is reportedly 3 seconds. Both the Thermapen and RT600C are water-resistant, but the RT600C is listed as dishwasher-safe too. I haven't tried using the dishwasher, but the RT600C has survived getting thrown into a bowl of water in my sink and regular hand-washing. In my opinion, if you're not cooking anything extremely cold or hot, and 2-3 seconds of wait time is not worth $77, the RT600C is a fine choice.
482631
Yes , Sort of. It is a little slower than most "instant read" thermometers, but fast enough to do the job at home. A little less convenient also, two pieces cable etc.
484937
I don't know the difference, but we got the cheaper one and only one unit worked. And trying to get it out of the package destroyed the box to the point I didn't even know how to return it. Don't recommend.
911622
I did not do any specific testing for this, but my perception is that the temp adjusts and stabilizes fairly quickly. Never felt any kind of dissatisfaction with regards to this. Been using this hygro-thermometer for sausage fermentation and dry curing and am very satisfied with its performance. Based on my observations, when the sensor is in the curing chamber and the fridge starts to cycle (cooling), the temperature on the display starts falling within seconds. So, yes, fairly quick and been very reliable so far.
430026
Mine takes up to 15 minutes. That's with a solution with a ppm of roughly 400. It does settle very quickly in a calibration solution, which has a much higher ppm. I understand why there would be a difference, but 400 ppm does seem like enough for a quicker reading.
1512118
Sort of, but it is still not that easy to read. My recommendation to you would be not to buy it. Mine only works intermittently and it shows temps ranging from way too high to way too low. For some reason at times it totally shuts down when inserted into the meat. To make a long story short it worked as it was supposed to for only about a week. I finally broke down and purchased a Therma Pen instant read thermometer for $96 (I haven't received it yet). I can only hope I have a better experience with the Therma Pen. So far I haven't had a good experience with any thermometer I have ever purchased and I have no idea why that should be!
1366318
Go by the battery that came with the product. Had mine since 7/6/2010 and now working on a 3rd battery (helps to turn it off when you're done). I have the RT600C-N thermometer, which is the same as the Amazon add. Original battery was an A76/LR4 (make unknown), replaced with a Duracell D357 and now replacing that with an Energizer A76. If you google the number from the original battery, you should be able to come up with a description of the battery, which many times includes a flock of equivalent numbers that it can replace. In the info I found, A76 and D357 are listed as replacements for each other, but not CR2032. Also CR2032 replacements don't include A78 or D357. Hope this helps. Go by the battery that came with the product. Had mine since 7/6/2010 and now working on a 3rd battery (helps to turn it off when you're done). I have the RT600C-N thermometer, which is the same as the Amazon add. Original battery was an A76/LR4 (make unknown), replaced with a Duracell D357 and now replacing that with an Energizer A76. If you google the number from the original battery, you should be able to come up with a description of the battery, which many times includes a flock of equivalent numbers that it can replace. In the info I found, A76 and D357 are listed as replacements for... » Read More Go by the battery that came with the product. Had mine since 7/6/2010 and now working on a 3rd battery (helps to turn it off when you're done). I have the RT600C-N thermometer, which is the same as the Amazon add. Original battery was an A76/LR4 (make unknown), replaced with a Duracell D357 and now replacing that with an Energizer A76. If you google the number from the original battery, you should be able to come up with a description of the battery, which many times includes a flock of equivalent numbers that it can replace. In the info I found, A76 and D357 are listed as replacements for each other, but not CR2032. Also CR2032 replacements don't include A78 or D357. Hope this helps. « Show Less
375693
Marjorie.....slightly different in readouts.....but they are interchangeable.....HOWEVER....this particular thermometer is not that accurate, so I would be wary of purchasing it....just an fyi.
1017630
It takes less than a second. you aim it on the right side of temporal for the most accurate reading. You can change the mode and it will also measure room temperature and surface temperature.
1606614
A cheap generic scanner just reads and displays the DTC (diagnostic trouble codes) codes and lets you clear them and turn off the Check Engine light.The CP9180 also lets you read the various power train (engine) sensors such as coolant temp, engine speed, vehicle speed, timing, etc (there are literally dozens). It also monitors emissions systems status, such as whether your EGR system has passed its self-test and is properly working. All the emissions systems must be "Ready" in order to pass the state emissions tests.The CP9180 only monitors the powertrain computer. It doesn't work with the air bag, transmission, ABS, anti-theft or other body modules that may be present in your car. A cheap generic scanner just reads and displays the DTC (diagnostic trouble codes) codes and lets you clear them and turn off the Check Engine light.The CP9180 also lets you read the various power train (engine) sensors such as coolant temp, engine speed, vehicle speed, timing, etc (there are literally dozens). It also monitors emissions systems status, such as whether your EGR system has passed its self-test and is properly working. All the emissions systems must be "Ready" in order to pass the state emissions tests.The CP9180 only monitors the powertrain... » Read More A cheap generic scanner just reads and displays the DTC (diagnostic trouble codes) codes and lets you clear them and turn off the Check Engine light.The CP9180 also lets you read the various power train (engine) sensors such as coolant temp, engine speed, vehicle speed, timing, etc (there are literally dozens). It also monitors emissions systems status, such as whether your EGR system has passed its self-test and is properly working. All the emissions systems must be "Ready" in order to pass the state emissions tests.The CP9180 only monitors the powertrain computer. It doesn't work with the air bag, transmission, ABS, anti-theft or other body modules that may be present in your car. « Show Less
187071
they both work well. I use mine to read the temp of my automobile components (exhaust hedders, water, etc) If you need a device that is incredibly accurate, youre looking at the wrong thing,however, if you just want to know the temp of an object, the cheapest one will do the job.
2214612
I just bought this for a gift took back home, no idea sorry. Consult with an IT guy/gal to show u the difference.
1657832
I am not really familiar with the cheaper model. I can say that the unit that I have works very well. It is very accurate and dependable and I highly recommend it.