it is cheaper than canon version, can i use it wit 70-200 f4 non IS???????
1728578
No. this one only for Nikon 70-200 f/4 VR, and we also have the one for Canon 70-200 f4 IS or Non IS, just search in Amazon, you will find it.
1728579
I bought it for my 70-200 Nikon f/4. It's quite satisfactory. Maybe not as polished as the Nikon, but the inside is smoothly finished and it works quite well. Savings are well worth it.
1728580
It works as designed on the IS version. Don't think it will work on the non IS version. Just noticed you mentioned the Canon version. This will not work on either the Canon 70-200 F4 IS or Non IS.
1728581
I am not sure what the Canon price is I am using on the Nikor 70-200 f4 lens, works good
1728582
I have used this with a Nikon 70-200 F/4.0 VR and it works perfectly. I am not sure about any Canon lense. You should contact the manufacturer of the ring to see if they make a Canon version. I would NOT try a product made for Nikon on a Canon lense.
646103
I don't believe that is what Canon means by low light. I have a HF R100 and it does not see my IR light at all.
736772
try the 24-105mm f/4l, its in a simalar price range and might be better suited, or the sigma 70-200 2.8 OS is probably best
811135
I don't have the Tamron 70-200 but I have the canon 70-200L f4, and I must say the 24-70 Tamron is not as sharp as the canon. Having said this, the Tamron is sharp enough for me and in anycase you need wide-tele lens for general photography as opposed to long telephoto zooms such as 70-200.
1616517
Will this work well with the Canon EF 70-200 L lens? Is there a list somewhere of compatible lenses?
473926
I'm getting ready to order the 400mm. I already have the 70-200L 2.8 IS and if I wanted the extra reach with zoom, I could put my 1.4x teleconverter on it, making it a [roughly] 100-280 f4.0. I don't have the 100-400 to compare, but I'd guess the sharpness is about the same between the 100-400 and the 70-200 + 1.4x. I still wouldn't have the reach between 280-400 but I'd have the sharpness when I need it. I can always attempt to move my feet to frame a subject with a prime if I'm too close. Read the reviews and decide for yourself.
2176756
f4 does require decent light for handholding. However, to capture fast-moving action, you need a fast aperture more than you need IS. IS steadies the camera shake, but the "action" won't be adequately frozen unless there is good available light for a fast shutter speed at f4. The Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS is a lot more expensive, though. I would suggest you look at the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 HSM as an alternative to the Canon.
830313
It's like any other modern 70-200 f2.8. If you set it to f2.8 in manual it will stay there. In auto mode the camera will change shutter speeds and aperture to suit conditions.
469115
absolutely, I use it on a 60d and love it. I actually sold a Canon 70-200mm f2.8 and went with this instead and I do not regret the choice.
1398393
Not only is it equivalent, I think it might even be better than the Canon. Lightning fast focus. Plus you save around $1200.
2246942
Well, I don't shoot w/ Canon, but i just tried it using a 70-300 Nikon f/4.5-5.6 VR, AF-S lens... since you asked. But why? Seriously,*I'm not well versed in things Canon*, but at least in the world Nikon, the 1.4x TC on a f/5.6 lens takes it to f/8 (you lose 1 stop, f/5.6 to f/8) w/ the 1.4XTC where it attempts to AF- but in less than optimal light, it just hunts. Usually, I wouldn't try a 1.4 X TC like this one you ask about- with a lens w/ a smaller max. aperture than f/4 (where takes it to f/5.6)... Also, depending on camera using, some won't AF beyond f/5.6 or limit to central AF focal point at f/8. hope this helps. Hopefully a Canon guru can answer this in Canonesse for you... good luck! Well, I don't shoot w/ Canon, but i just tried it using a 70-300 Nikon f/4.5-5.6 VR, AF-S lens... since you asked. But why? Seriously,*I'm not well versed in things Canon*, but at least in the world Nikon, the 1.4x TC on a f/5.6 lens takes it to f/8 (you lose 1 stop, f/5.6 to f/8) w/ the 1.4XTC where it attempts to AF- but in less than optimal light, it just hunts. Usually, I wouldn't try a 1.4 X TC like this one you ask about- with a lens w/ a smaller max. aperture than f/4 (where takes it to f/5.6)... Also, depending on camera using, some won't AF beyond f/5.6 or limit to central AF... » Read More Well, I don't shoot w/ Canon, but i just tried it using a 70-300 Nikon f/4.5-5.6 VR, AF-S lens... since you asked. But why? Seriously,*I'm not well versed in things Canon*, but at least in the world Nikon, the 1.4x TC on a f/5.6 lens takes it to f/8 (you lose 1 stop, f/5.6 to f/8) w/ the 1.4XTC where it attempts to AF- but in less than optimal light, it just hunts. Usually, I wouldn't try a 1.4 X TC like this one you ask about- with a lens w/ a smaller max. aperture than f/4 (where takes it to f/5.6)... Also, depending on camera using, some won't AF beyond f/5.6 or limit to central AF focal point at f/8. hope this helps. Hopefully a Canon guru can answer this in Canonesse for you... good luck! « Show Less
839198
You would get a lot more bang for fewer bucks by replacing the D-90 body (12.4 mpix DX format) with a new D-610 (24.3 mpix FX format) if your 200 mm lens is in that format also, i.e., if it is the 70-200 FX zoom. Plus, HD video and faster internal processing.
1351159
Yes, but you will loose the ability to be close up to the action. I would keep the 55-200mm and adjust your ISO settings on the camera instead.
1964654
I could not say...I do not own that lens. If the barrel is the same diameter as the 70-200mm f4 Canon lens, it should work fine!
1669169
I use Nikon d700 with the same 70-200. Works great for me but then all I use it for is sport shooting. I don't get too aggressive with my equipment. Usually stand and shoot. Not really into jumping around or running with it.
76751
No - I bought it for canon. And anyway - I would not recommend it unless you are really on low budget.
2176757
Planning to but canon 70-200 L but confused now after reading the forums and comments. Which one I should buy ?canon 70-200 F4 L IS USM or f2.8 L USL (Non IS)Pls Suggest