Hello,i just purchased a Nikon D810FX Would this 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G Lens fit,be adequate,fast and user friendly? Thank you so much
1156618
Not really. This lens is designed for the DX format and your camera is based on the FX format. You need to get FX lenses. The one that would come closest to this range on your camera would be the AF-S 28-300 F/3.5-5.6 ED VR lens.
423083
I have the sel18105G. I didn't compare it with other lens and I am an amateur photographer. All I can say is that I think it is great withnice crisp photos.
19141
Mine is a Nikkor 55-300mm lens and fits properly. So 18-105 which is smaller should be a loose fit. You can place some cylindrical packing or a holder for cam accessories. Make sure you do that or else the lens will move inside the case.
1626522
I use a Nikon, and it fitted. The problem is the lens has no stabilizer, so it is difficult to use.
2159192
i think the 18-135 mm lens on my D60 is the same as yours, and if so yes it fits well.
507556
DC, are you referring to the Micro Nikkor 85mm f3.5G DX? If so this would be a very good addition to your kit. Although not the fastest lens in the world it is very versatile for either mid range focal length for portrait or macro work. The lens is sharp with good contrast and color rendition. AF is fast on my D7100 and should work well on the D5100 as well.
1237348
Ive actually returned this camera and ended getting a Nikon D7000 w Lens 18-140mm so I didnt have to constantly worry of changing the lens. Find those type of camera without the struggle of changing lens!
455224
I usually carry with me my Canon 5DMk iii, 70-300 EF (kit lens), 24-70 f/2.8 L, a 50mm prime, a few LEE filters and a speed lite 580EXii, they all fit pretty well and I have a little space for my charger, blower, etc.. SO I think it will fit, but am not a Nikon user and I also don't carry the 70-200 lens which is bulkier than the 70-300 EF lens. If you plan on having the 70-200 on the body, then it should ideally fit. I have taken this to several trips and have been more than happy.
2245088
I recommend you go to Nikon.com site and check the lens compatibility chart ... I did it before buy it. Mine is D7100
816004
You should be able to look on the side of your lens to determine it's size. This particular lens fits 55mm. I'm under the impression that yours is 35mm but I'm not positive.
357030
I use a nikon with a 55-200 lense. It fits fine. It is a very good case. I have no complaints. I suppose you can return in case or there is a bigger size last time i checked. Highly recommended product.
1312204
This is the first 10-100mm lens I have ever bought and I purchased it specifically for a Nikon 1 J3 so I did not 'shop it' at all. I am very happy w/the lens but am not conversant enough to explain why. Sorry.
19871
Hi Michael, for some reason I've returned this item...Not because of having any trouble! I've decided to but real macro lens instead of using something like that just because of quality of the image with the Nikon macro lenses. Sorry
1020218
This lens is AF. I can't answer your question about Nikon. This lens is for Canon.
724505
Hey Barbara, I would definitely try one a little sturdier. I have this one now on a lighter Nikon (D7000) and primarily use a smaller lens (18-105) and I think it is about at capacity and maybe a little under-qualified. Just one man's opinion but I think something more robust would suit your very nice set up better.
1156617
The 18-140 lens I have is made for DX (small image) cameras. It might cover the FX image area (which is 1.5 times bigger) at focal length of 50mm or longer, but at wider zoom settings in the FX the image would be a little round picture - with all the corners cut off. You need lenses specifically designed for FX cameras, but some of the older 35mm film camera lenses might work. However, if you are recycling film camera lenses, make sure you try them on your FX first. If it functions well AND does all the things you want it to do on your FX, then you may save a few bucks, but I would suggest you stick with lenses designed for FX - particularly if you are new to SLR digital photography. The 18-140 lens I have is made for DX (small image) cameras. It might cover the FX image area (which is 1.5 times bigger) at focal length of 50mm or longer, but at wider zoom settings in the FX the image would be a little round picture - with all the corners cut off. You need lenses specifically designed for FX cameras, but some of the older 35mm film camera lenses might work. However, if you are recycling film camera lenses, make sure you try them on your FX first. If it functions well AND does all the things you want it to do on your FX, then you may save a few bucks, but I would suggest... » Read More The 18-140 lens I have is made for DX (small image) cameras. It might cover the FX image area (which is 1.5 times bigger) at focal length of 50mm or longer, but at wider zoom settings in the FX the image would be a little round picture - with all the corners cut off. You need lenses specifically designed for FX cameras, but some of the older 35mm film camera lenses might work. However, if you are recycling film camera lenses, make sure you try them on your FX first. If it functions well AND does all the things you want it to do on your FX, then you may save a few bucks, but I would suggest you stick with lenses designed for FX - particularly if you are new to SLR digital photography. « Show Less
2272239
It wouldn't be either better or worse. That would depend mainly on your apature settings. The 18-140mm allows a weirder zoom range. Your best bet is to find This for cheaper:Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX ED VR Nikkor Wide-Angle Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras