Does this allow for multiple wan ips and routing to certain wans based on group/ip?
1726922
You can set each interface (Jack) to have different tributes. You can configure two or more of the RJ45 interfaces to be WANs. You can set them up in a failover configuration or a load balancing configuration. Documentation is sparse. Doing this is possible but will require a lot of Googling to set it up
244632
Spyer231,After double checking with my nephew, to make sure, the short answer is yes. In Tomato, you disable WAN and assign the DHCP function to another router on the LAN.
244629
I believe it allows you to specific dhcp server and disable wan with the stock firmware. Personally I flashed ddwrt onto the router, let's you do all of that. Quality of the product is high I recommend it.
1799694
I haven't really encountered any attempts at DDOS to answer that, but I do know there is a plethora of options for setting up a VPN. There are options within the software (provided you keep it up to date, the original shipped firmware was buggy) to specifically subnet for the VPN based on MAC address and allow the rest to be open. This allows for good control over bandwidth management if you decide not to use the built in bandwidth management software.
742328
It does. You can set it up via the GUI under IP Configuration > IPv4 Management and Interfaces > DHCP Server. Or you can set it up using the CLI.
1640449
Yes. Just set up port forwarding on your router. And if you want, you can use a dynamic DNS service to maintain a constant URL to access through.
1537461
Yes. There are few places that explain this configuration. It is important to know that terminology used by Mikrotik is "PCC" (per connection control) and "Nth Load Balancing." There are links to a few types of load balancing on this Mikrotik Wiki page; http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:PCC Another type of load balancing is based on type of traffic, explained here; http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Per-Traffic_Load_Balancing There's also a good discussion with other links to more ideas here; http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=67699
10405
Well then why get this router? Why not just have two separate wans to begin with right?
2004912
The unit is highly flexible in terms of configuration. It has a wizard that will set up a configuration such that port eth1 will be your wan port.
1447119
http://www.engeniustech.com.sg/files/ENH200%20User%20Manual.pdf Yes. You may have to do some IP configurations depending on how you have it set up though.
1457735
Looking at the documentation, it does support PPPoE and the GUI looks decent. As for supporting a 255.255.0.0 subnet, it looks like it will but I have never tried it. http://dl.ubnt.com/guides/AirRouter/AirRouter_User_Guide.pdf
1329525
There are tunnel protocols that may not function. These are able to pick up and configure to "extend" an existing link. I have a single unit working as an access point off a DLINK wrt and hadn't seen any problems.
1038591
If you mean Truly separate clients, then no, I doubt it since there is only one access list. You can however make a mock-up of that type of setup by making to separate logins between the 2, and limiting the access on the client side. I'm not sure why you'd want to though, since they will connect to the same network on the router. If I am understanding your question correctly. What the others are describing is a network, and an access point type of setup. NOT 2 distinctly separate networks. Just 2 different connection types that give you some combination of internet, and network access that you can custom filter to some extent. If you mean Truly separate clients, then no, I doubt it since there is only one access list. You can however make a mock-up of that type of setup by making to separate logins between the 2, and limiting the access on the client side. I'm not sure why you'd want to though, since they will connect to the same network on the router. If I am understanding your question correctly. What the others are describing is a network, and an access point type of setup. NOT 2 distinctly separate networks. Just 2 different connection types that give you some combination of internet, and network access... » Read More If you mean Truly separate clients, then no, I doubt it since there is only one access list. You can however make a mock-up of that type of setup by making to separate logins between the 2, and limiting the access on the client side. I'm not sure why you'd want to though, since they will connect to the same network on the router. If I am understanding your question correctly. What the others are describing is a network, and an access point type of setup. NOT 2 distinctly separate networks. Just 2 different connection types that give you some combination of internet, and network access that you can custom filter to some extent. « Show Less
1222235
Yes, you can use two or more kits and connect as many devices to the network as you wish. It does not matter which one is connected to the router, as long as it stays connected for the others to connect to.
104122
No, this is a simple switch. It does not have DHCP capabilities or any advanced routing.
1204729
Yes - I believe the basic process you are going to want to use is a destination NAT to translate an internal address to a public IP, and then use a source NAT to force the packets from the internal device through it's appropriate public IP (creating a one-to-one NAT). https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/Nat-1-1-on-edgerouter/td-p/456099 might be of use.
1392811
Depends on the complexity of the network. With simple routing it is plug and play, but I have also used them in networks that required defining a static route before getting full functionality.