Nikon M series 4-16 Scope Vs P series 4-12 ...which is best for 223 shooting?
1726585
Both are very good. I chose the 4x16 bdc and have been extremely satisfied. It is almost not fair how accurate it is
1726586
I don't have a P series 4-12, but have the lower magnification, I believe 2 -7 or something like that. (sorry at work not at home where I can look). The reticle on my P scope is much thicker than my M series scope, which is much better at the higher magnification. And really like the BDC circles as they don't cover the target. I wish I had another M series with lower mag versus the P series I have now. Love the M series scope. has quickly become my favorite.
1726587
I Have A 30-06 With a3-9x40 Scope On It Will the m-223 4-19x42 Work on it And I Shoot a 150 Gain bullet.
206378
I would guess Extended Range. This mount gives you 20 moa more elevation than the regular 223 mount, important if shooting more than 3-400 yards. Hope this helps, Happy Shooting.
425020
Hi!, I'm not sure is the short answer. But some considerations are: The scope NEEDS to be somewhat short as possible to avoid getting in the way of the charge handle otherwise you WILL have problems chambering a round when using the handle.. This particular scope is quite long. Eye relief is another consideration and again I haven't checked this out on this rifle. I would not put this Banner scope on an AR. Take a close look at Nikon which makes a few models geared for the AR type rifles. I bought a Nikon P-223 scope for my AR. It's a 4 power which I desire on that rifle (my choice). Amazon also offers a model M-223 with higher and variable powers for the AR. I would look at these 2 models INSTEAD of the Banner scope which is so-so in my opinion. Nikon optics are superior to the Bushnell Banner line. Do a search on AMAZON. I think you will be pleased. You can also search the forums and get an idea what other people prefer. Don't go cheap on optics and don't go crazy expensive either. I hope all this helps. Let me know how it all works out for you. Jim
944544
The P-223 is perfect for me as I rarely shoot over 100yds in hunting applications. Occasionally I do shoot out to 300yds on targets. The P-223 has great turrets with real crisp adjustments. The ProStaff that you mentioned is a good scope too so it really depends on what you are trying to do with it.
395122
The P223 is considered a medium range scope and the m223 is a long range scope..if you are just going to be plinking go with the P series, but if you want a good all around scope the M series is awesome..but either way you can't go wrong with a Nikon, be sure to get the Nikon scope mount as well and you will have a good setup.
2151081
In my opinion, yes. 4x12 is great for doing bench top shooting but in the field it is real tough to spot game in timber or low light with a 4x12 power scope at its lowest setting even. I took mine off and replaced it with a two power by 7. That is why the 3x9's are so popular. It is a great balance of magnification. Again - in my opinion. A lot depends on what you want that rifle to do and where you plan on using it. I have found that almost all of my shots are 300yds or under and that I can do with 2-4 power setting on all dear and bear size game.
967393
The 24-105 is more versatile. The 135 is limiting but has gorgeous shallow depth of field.
437329
That's up to your personal preference. Rick Utsler on youtube has suggestions for scope. Youtube this rifle.
968439
I would go with the P308 Nikon scope. It will give you the proper BDC for that projectile. Same scope, just designed for the 308 , you will not be sorry . I have one on my a r10 and it is spot on, (i do realize the pun there)
1781807
Tasco and Bushnell are about the same quality-wise. Both are decent for the price. Since you're scoping a 91/30, I would go with the Bushnell Mil-dot since that will give you a way to place long shots more accurately.
759247
Even better. The 1.4 is rock solid compared to the flimsy 1.8, and slightly faster. Ten times as expensive, but may be worth it. If you're still thinking of adding a new zoom to your arsenal, look at the 24-105L, as well. It's pretty much a coin toss, as far as IQ, with the 24-70L, but it adds IS. So, it's one stop slower, but it gains about 3 stops due to the IS, so it's actually better for low-light than the "faster" lens. And longer, too.
1534476
if you are using the M4 223 cal you can go out as far as 350 to 400 meters, anything past that is luck or you are a great shooter. I have them on mind and for the bucks they are worth the money. hope that help.
2151078
I haven't compared the two but here in New England, where long range shots are rare, the 2-3 is more practical and the 12 is not useful. I've used the 9x only once to see antlers and even then, there was so much brush and limbs in the way that the magnification was really no help. I've never hunt out west but I could imagine the 4-12 might be more appropriate there.
136387
I would think that it would mount on any 223 rifle. I have mine on a S&W; MP, I also use the M308 on a POF AR10. Absolutely love the Nikon scopes. You can dial in the ballistics with the weight of the bullet, type, Mfr etc with their app for these scopes.
342922
The difference is the type of sight grids you will be looking at through the scope. The $101. model has what is called "Range Finder" the $114. model has the P4 Sniper grids. Depends on how or what you are shooting as well as your preference. I prefer the P4 Sniper grid myself. If you are not familiar with the two, you may want to go to a dealer and check them out so as you will be satisfied with the one you get.
1453160
I have this mount with the nikon p-223 mounted on a plain-ole DPMS flattop. From a seated position, resting on sticks, I am shooting 3-4" groups @ 450yds. I have never had to re-zero the optics. I have not removed the optics and remounted however. -R
669216
I own both and have used them on deer rifles for several years. I can truthfully say in the field I see absolutely no difference. Dropped a nice buck 15 minutes before legal shooting time was over one evening a week ago using a Pro-Staff scope. Light was waning but I was able to put a good shot on him some 150 yards away with the light transmission from the Nikon.