Is the 330 or 340 better?
1700500
I had both and hated the 340. The 330 takes far better photos/video and has better battery life. However, some of the 330's have an issue with the battery connection that makes them stop working.
1700501
the 330 got much better reviews than the 340- I was going to buy the 340 but instead bought the 330 which I love so much I bought a second one as a spare- pics are awesome!
1700502
I have a good copy of the Canon 330 and wrote a good review of it - and I still like it. - BUT - I bought it on sale on Amazon. Gradually the price has crepted up to almost double what I paid. At the current price point, I might try the Canon 340, the Casio ZR700, or the Panasonic ZS25 or ZS20. I think this camera is now on premium pricing. I would not pay more than $200 or, preferably $175 for it - especially with its continuing battery issues. You can do better.
1066074
The 230 (and 231) have a step through design to get on and off. The older, and no longer made, 203 and 213 have a longer rail that the seat attaches to, that goes all the way to the pedal unit. This allows the seat to get closer to the pedals and people with shorter legs can use it. If you are sharter than 5'4" it is questionable wheather the 230 or 231 will work for you.
1150132
135L exceeds the 200L II in almost every respect. Contrast, sharpness, etc. The perspective one achieves with the 135 length is lovely. Rent them both if you're on the fence that much. I purchased the 70-200 F4L IS for event & wedding photography, and eventually sold it for the 200L II; every time I was using the 70-200, I was at the far end, and the prime is sharper, lighter, offers the extra stop (vs. the f4), etc. My 135L has been with me for years, is rarely matched in performance, and would be the last thing to go in my kit.
1029669
The difference is the amount of ink. The 31 has 3ml of each color (or 9ml total) and the 41 has 4ml of each color (or 12ml total). If you're printer is compatible with the 51, that one has 7ml of each color (or 21ml) and is most likely going to be the best value.
2242756
It is recommended to use 400 because it is more sensitive to light. You could use 200 but with larger apertures or slower times, which is generally more inconvenient.
1556513
For about $30 difference, the 330 is a much better buy, and for several reasons.First, the CMOS sensor with only 12 megapixel in the 330 is so much better than the CCD sensor with 16mp (remember, in small sensors like this camera, less megapixels is actually better than more!)Also the range is much better, the 330 has a wide-angle lens of 24mm, and the 130 starts from 28mm. And it's also longer, 10x optical zoom on the 330 vs. 8x on the 130.Then you have the Digic5 processor on the 330, which has many advantages over the older Digic4 processor on the 130.Video on the 130 is maxing out at 25 fps, not good enough in my book. The HS330 had 30fps, much more smooth. For about $30 difference, the 330 is a much better buy, and for several reasons.First, the CMOS sensor with only 12 megapixel in the 330 is so much better than the CCD sensor with 16mp (remember, in small sensors like this camera, less megapixels is actually better than more!)Also the range is much better, the 330 has a wide-angle lens of 24mm, and the 130 starts from 28mm. And it's also longer, 10x optical zoom on the 330 vs. 8x on the 130.Then you have the Digic5 processor on the 330, which has many advantages over the older Digic4 processor on the 130.Video on the... » Read More For about $30 difference, the 330 is a much better buy, and for several reasons.First, the CMOS sensor with only 12 megapixel in the 330 is so much better than the CCD sensor with 16mp (remember, in small sensors like this camera, less megapixels is actually better than more!)Also the range is much better, the 330 has a wide-angle lens of 24mm, and the 130 starts from 28mm. And it's also longer, 10x optical zoom on the 330 vs. 8x on the 130.Then you have the Digic5 processor on the 330, which has many advantages over the older Digic4 processor on the 130.Video on the 130 is maxing out at 25 fps, not good enough in my book. The HS330 had 30fps, much more smooth. « Show Less
405525
I don't know anything about the Elph 340. I think for indoor photos the Wb30f isn't too good for action shots. But outdoors I think its good.
1962521
The 350 is unfamiliar to me but I would trade up if I could , in most cases you will get a better unit with better options and performance . Having what you are use to using is also important but we always get familiar with new things everyday
1570864
I am not sure but it weighs me and i'm around 300 lbs. so I would go with the 440
1961876
either would work great. ? is how much weight do you want to carry or people? My understanding is 330 is best for two people max and my 370 carries two adults and one kid easily. hope that helps?
868689
The 3149400 is a suitable substition for the 311857. The main difference between the two is amp rating and the amp rating on the 3149400 is adequate.
123475
Good question. The difference is better optics at 1.4f stop, or wide open. If you shoot wide open all the time, then you might want to consider that extra expense. On the other hand, if you shoot occasionally wide open, this lens (400) is great and I have liked shooting with it.
1706892
Although I have both, I prefer the 102 is it is smaller, its blade is thinner and narrower which in my mind makes it a more useful and versatile knife. The 119 is a cool knife also but it is very large and stout. I do love the brown handle versus the black, it is worth the extra cost in my view.
1518250
I'd prefer the 330 HS -- because I don't trust touchscreens.However, I don't own either at the moment. I'm shopping for a replacement for a damaged 300 HS, and the 330 HS appears to be a similar camera with some nice upgrades.The differences in megapixels and zoom range are really minor. It's doubtful that you'd notice any significant diffs.
1407824
Two things are special about the ELPH 110 that, until now, made it superior to the other ELPH models: 1) a slightly wider lens than the other models (24mm, I believe), and 2) AMAZING video quality for such a compact camera. It appears that the 340 has a 25 mm wide angle and 300 mm at the long end of the zoom, which is impressive. It also has the ability to connect with wireless devices so that you can upload your images immediately to the social network of your choice. It doesn't get rave reviews on its video capability, however, but unless video quality is very important to you, it appears that the 340 is a good deal. Two things are special about the ELPH 110 that, until now, made it superior to the other ELPH models: 1) a slightly wider lens than the other models (24mm, I believe), and 2) AMAZING video quality for such a compact camera. It appears that the 340 has a 25 mm wide angle and 300 mm at the long end of the zoom, which is impressive. It also has the ability to connect with wireless devices so that you can upload your images immediately to the social network of your choice. It doesn't get rave reviews on its video capability, however, but unless video quality is very important to you, it appears... » Read More Two things are special about the ELPH 110 that, until now, made it superior to the other ELPH models: 1) a slightly wider lens than the other models (24mm, I believe), and 2) AMAZING video quality for such a compact camera. It appears that the 340 has a 25 mm wide angle and 300 mm at the long end of the zoom, which is impressive. It also has the ability to connect with wireless devices so that you can upload your images immediately to the social network of your choice. It doesn't get rave reviews on its video capability, however, but unless video quality is very important to you, it appears that the 340 is a good deal. « Show Less
2007298
I've never tried the 228 but I believe it is louder than the 236. That was a factor in my choice to get the 236.
91261
Besides the finish the 330 has a 1/2 HP motor where the 4000 has a 1/3 HP motor.