How is this racquet compared to the Head Titanium series?
1718790
I have no experience with any other Head series. All I know, is this racquet was bought untried and was perfect for my game (hard hitting topspin forehands), such that I promptly bought a second identical racquet.
65488
Have owned 2 of this type. It's more oval.Usually plays very well. Over time it skips.That's why I have 2. I use one or the other daily.
367088
beats are fragile and break often. Razer forged has about the same bass and is very well build. I tried beats , bose and razer. other than it being a bit heavy at the beginning, razer is the best one i tried so far. after a month or so i got used to the weight and don't even notice it. definitely go for it. Pluse, youtube it.
359756
I haven't used the other DHS rackets but still it's heavy compared to my old rackets of Joola and Donic. Hope it helps.
880385
The dynamics are quite good. I haven't had to adjust them at all, but you can. If you are a drummer already, you can adapt to these very easily. I'm getting a 300 watt amp for them and totally trust them for gigs I'm doing next month. If others are having issues with velocity sensitivity, I can't comment on that. My set works great. I've been drumming for over 40 years. This set does a great job for me. Espescially 3 and 27.
1880116
Love my G-20X Ball Head! Do not own the cheaper one so how could I compare/respond? Old adage "You get what you pay for" would be my take.
1608141
Im not sure really. Sorry. I tell you what though you wont go wrong buying this racquet. It is by far the best racquet Ive played with. Sorry I couldnt answer the specific question though.
22808
I would recommend going with the Oster Titan instead. The t finisher is small and really meant more for detailing. They get hot if you use them for more than cleaning up around the ear, neckline or for barbering designs.
2244638
I looked at the Safety 1st Alpha Omega, but wasn't all that impressed with the comparative build quality. Also, the amazon reviews for it weren't as good when I was researching. The portability of the Diono also swayed me.
337044
I think the sound is much better, the controls work good too. I train on my bike and in the gym and sweat a lot, but idk how water resistant they are. If you get some noise canceling tips that fit tight the bass is better though.
1918863
Have played with many different racquets over the years. The Wilson K-1 has given me the most satisfaction. I would suggest you try the racquet first before making the purchase. The racquet must fit your style of play. If it doesn't you could injure yourself, or at the very least end up with a racquet you dislike. Most tennis clubs allow you to test their racquets. I found Amazon to have the best price for the K-1. Answering your question: the more surface area of a racquet' s face the bigger the sweet spot. Therefore, less chance the racquet twists in your hand.
49752
TR77 has a shorter barrel, 200fps more and costs about $60 more. Both good, but I like my fury better.
590878
In my opinion it is way above a beginners Racket? I have had 4 of them over the last 10 years and believe it is as good as any on the market. I understand it is the biggest selling Racket of all time! Jako
1567018
I've had both models. Newer version is a better product. Treble & midrange is improved overall & adjustable bass is smoother. A great listening experience. The new Crushers are a big step up from the older Skull crushers
179315
also consider tralucent 1+2 and tralucent Ref.1. I have had the 1+2 (with the gold cable) and must say, they where a bit more "airy" sounding, more dinamic, clear, at least so much details. The bass was perhaps better controlled. A pitty they broke twice. I'still waiting for a replacement.... Overal the listening experience with the 1+2 was overwhelmig.The Shure SE846 are very solid performer and listening with them is also addicting. The tralucent ref. 1 is the "upgrade" of the 1+2. There ist also a "uber-cable" (solid core) for the 1+2 and Ref. 1 (costs over 1000$). With this cable both would sound better... also consider tralucent 1+2 and tralucent Ref.1. I have had the 1+2 (with the gold cable) and must say, they where a bit more "airy" sounding, more dinamic, clear, at least so much details. The bass was perhaps better controlled. A pitty they broke twice. I'still waiting for a replacement.... Overal the listening experience with the 1+2 was overwhelmig.The Shure SE846 are very solid performer and listening with them is also addicting. The tralucent ref. 1 is the "upgrade" of the 1+2. There ist also a "uber-cable" (solid core) for the 1+2 and Ref. 1 (costs over... » Read More also consider tralucent 1+2 and tralucent Ref.1. I have had the 1+2 (with the gold cable) and must say, they where a bit more "airy" sounding, more dinamic, clear, at least so much details. The bass was perhaps better controlled. A pitty they broke twice. I'still waiting for a replacement.... Overal the listening experience with the 1+2 was overwhelmig.The Shure SE846 are very solid performer and listening with them is also addicting. The tralucent ref. 1 is the "upgrade" of the 1+2. There ist also a "uber-cable" (solid core) for the 1+2 and Ref. 1 (costs over 1000$). With this cable both would sound better... « Show Less
374351
I think it is make of composite. The racquet is very light by comparing to an aluminum junior racquet. The drawback of being light is that the racquet can easily twisted during impact if the ball is not landed on the sweet spot.
167903
From what I heard the only difference between the 1128G and the 1128T are different suppliers to Takamine. I have one of each and they both work well with good construction. Definitely snug for a dreadnough or NEX, which is what I wanted. No bouncing around inside.