one sided weight of this receiver: Am I missing something?
1710642
The power transformer is on the left side. Nothing is wrong, just the way it is designed.
1201998
I agree with Mark, Sherwood makes a number of good inexpensive receivers... Check out Parts Express...
128210
Giving the receiver one out of five stars in your review is a little tough don't you think? I've had this unit since July and it's been great.
1401214
I am not sure the manufacturer, most would be 300 lbs ( because it is 2 inch receiver) mine has handled that with ease
653835
I think this is a Class AB receiver. On the receiver and in the manual I do not see it listed. Per research done online, I have seen it referred to as A/B.
1428581
I assume that you are referring to the little stand, and while the receiver will work OK without it, I recommend that you avoid having the receiver lying against a shelf, wall, etc., where the unit might overheat if it lacked a good air flow.
2190513
My receiver has 2 zones, but I've never used both. I bet you can figure out away to make it do what you want.
1250667
there's a hole on the back to hang it, but the cradle for the receiver isn't deep enough to keep it from sliding off. this base is wedge shaped. you should probably look for a flatter base for easier mounting
46878
it's built for a 2" receiver, but it's wobbly as heck. I can't even imagine what it would be like with an adapter!
1175923
He is correct. That's on the Pioneer website. Go to the page below and compare the 1018 to the 1019. i saw the same thing and was pretty puzzled by what was left off. The amp is rated at 10W less per channel, but that can't account for the 10lb difference. 33% weight reduction feels severe to me. My sense is that product is aiming down market.http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Products/HomeEntertainment/AV-Receivers/PioneerReceivers
2085573
You can use the adapter, but the smaller class 1 receiver is only rated for 200 lbs, so don't push it. Remember to include the weight of the carrier!
843416
I have only tried it for its specified purpose I had no means of using it as a receiver. but I purchased two of these models from separate manufacturers companies and neither one of them worked. one of the companies I bought them from were not very easy with the return and the other was rather prompt. I would advise you do like I did and just save up a little more cash and get a better model
1220270
Thanks for the info. I ordered the unit and have owned it for about a week now. Appears to be a very good receiver.
504196
excellent receiver for the money! Hook it up per the instructions given by the manufacturer!
787554
I can't say I've ever run into that problem. It opens all the way on both sides so it would appear the weight is distributed pretty evenly, even with product inside.
33598
Original design intention was to be installed on the side of the receiver. It will install very easily this way. You would have to modify your stock if you wanted to install differently.
813732
it is self leveling so it can't be set on an angle as it will compensate for level. you can set it for different degrees of rise and fall to work with the receiver