I'm currently using the AF-S Nikkor 55-300mm lens on my D3200, and I'm looking to purchase a 'next step up' zoom lens. Does the 18-200mm fit the bill?
1723188
The lens will provide you with a wide angle range, however it seems like you would be double spending as you already have a lens that goes up to 300mm. If having a wide angle lens is absolutely important for you, I would recommend that you go for a 35mm lens with no zoom. It is a very versitle lens, great depth of field and will give you better image quality due to less moving elements inside the lens.Having used the 18 - 200mm and comparing it to my 50mm, I usually use my 50mm due to the noticable difrence in image sharpness.I hope that helps.
1723189
You already seem to have the reach upto 300 mm. If you need anything for the wider side this will be good. But why not just buy an 18-55 mm. It will be cheaper and increase your range from 18-300. There is a 16-85mm too and a 16-35mm too if you want. Hope this helps.
1723190
I think it does. I have the first version on my D7000 and even though it was used when purchased I've not been dissapointed with it. It's a great zoom and wide angle lens. I've found too that the subject isolation at 200 is pretty good as well. Not great for low light without a flash but otherwise I've enjoyed mine.
201652
You can use the 67mm on the 200-300 zoom lens, I believe. Those lens fit the D series Nikon. The 18-55mm lens uses the 52mm filter. My Nikon is a D3000 and I researched this lens set quite a bit before finalizing my decision. So, keep in mind: 52mm filter for an 18-55mm lens; 67mm for the 55-200mm and the 70-300mm, both zoom lenses. If you question it, just ask the same question you posted here on Google and you will find your answer!!
501122
Thanks for the feedback. I ended up getting the Canon 17-55/2.8IS. It was more expensive, but I had come across some extra money. I've had that lens for several month now and it's awesome. The zoom range is excellent, it's great having f2.8 through the whole range, and the IS adds probably at least 3 stops. It's very sharp when I do my part, especially when it's stopped down a couple clicks. I would still love to get a lens like I described in my OP, but I'm looking at a wide angle zoom and a better telephoto lens before that one.
183451
I shoot the same subjects and have been very pleased with the 18-250mm zoom. If you want a little more reach get the 55-300mm in place of the 18-250. With that choice I would then add the 18-55mm. I'm assuming you want to stay with Pentax brand. Neither zoom is "cheap" but then you get what you pay for. I chose the 18-250 because I hand hold the camera most of the time and here in the Pacific NW the light levels in the winter are pretty low. I doubt if I maxed out the 300mm (450mm equivalent) would I get a sharp image. Love the K20D by the way.
1856384
I looked at both this lens & the 16-35mm lens. I got the 16-35mm lens. In my search for other lenses I found that the 18-35 is not that great.
369534
Actually I have the same question... However, based on the reviews I have seen so far, I think I will go for the 18-135mm. Everybody recomends the good range that it provides, and buying it individually it becomes an expensive lens. On the other hand the 18-55mm will force the need for having an extra zoom.
1046883
Have a Nikon D3200 (18-55mm lens) with extra 55-200 lens and it all fits like a lovely glove! Very easy to carry or attach to back packs too.
1272575
I have both the Tamron 17-50 and the 28-75 as well as the Tamron 28-300 that I shoot with the Nikon D200. I can't say if I prefer the 17-50 over 28-75 but I love both of them and find I use them both depending on what I'm shooting. If I could afford only 1 lens it would probably be the 28-75 for my type of shooting. If you;'e shooting large groups of people or need the wider angle then I'm sure 17-50 may serve you better.
1371226
Wilmer M.You have to buy the one for the Canon....the canon lens have a different configuration than the Nikon....So you have to buy the one specific for your model of camera.I found you one on Amazon. Here is the link: Tamron Auto Focus 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras (Model A14E)
907410
I use this lens on the D3200 fine, I can't confirm yor model but usually they are interchangeable. This is a DX lens so I didn't have to do anything other than snap it on and shoot. It's auto everything no need to focus manually etc. Depending on the speed of your camera and when using sport mode, fast shutter speed, this should be good for you to use without use of a tripod. But when zoomed in you will find a brace, unipod or other stabilizer helpful. I am very happy with my purchase. It's not too heavy as other zoom lens are when you go above 300mm, which means I use it more. Hope thisis helpful info.
1736484
I have both the 18-200 and the 85 mm f/1.8 among others. These two are the lenses I most use (I photograph people and places). The 85 mm is great for head shots, particularly indoors without flash. If $450 is a reach, try eBay where you'll see lots of them.
2251841
I do own a 18-50mm on my Rebel.. and this one is for my Nikon... But I really can't distinguish any differences since I am pretty new to the hobby. But I find it very easy now to just have one lens on all the time .. with my canon I would always have to keep changing from my 15-50mm to my zoom lens a lot and it takes too much time plus you have to carry another lens with you. So far so good.. its a really awesome lens.. and all my friends think its cool!
568551
The 200mm gives you more extra zoom than you would think. I probably do more shooting at that focal length than any other.
916481
I have been very happy with the 18-200mm. It was my first lens and remains a workhorse. I have since acquired a 28-135mm as part of a used setup and have yet to try it - there's been no need as the 18-200mm exceeds it in range.
1239593
The focal length being 105mm will give you a sharp picture through the entire range. It's not the most durable lens since it has a plastic mount. The 18 200mm has a metal mount. It's probably a better all around lens but it does get soft in places. For me it seems to be around 135mm but it seems to help if you get the shutter speed around 1/500. I had the 18 105mm for two years and the mount broke on me after dropping from a 2 1/2 foot speaker onto carpet. Cost $65 to fix.
1664836
This is generally seen as a direct upgrade from the 18-55 Kit lens. It covers almost the same focal lengths, but with wider aperture (more possible light), better autofocus, and better overall image quality. If you like the zoom range on the kit lens but are unsatisfied with the images that come from it, this is a lens you should consider.
423677
If you are going to stick with a DX sensor Nikon for a while, then I think the 18-300mm is your best value. The image quality is going to be very comparable to the 28-300mm, plus the 18-300 has these advantages for the DX shooter: - It starts at 18mm, so you have much wider coverage for landscape shots or tight spaces - It's smaller and lighter. Since this is going to be an all-purpose travel lens, this will be very helpful - It's about $150 less - If you ever go up to FX / full-frame, you can always sell this lens down the road and recoup about 65-75% of the original cost Enjoy!