would this camera e a good secondary camera for wedding shots?
1717509
I have been very pleased with my GE camera and have used t at many important events such as my grandchildren's Christening and my Mother's 94th Birthday. I do trust the camera to produce very good photos. I would not hesitate to use it as a back-up to a professional photographer and think that it would be ideal for those candid photos.
1717510
Definitely no. The focusing is too slow and the low light performance too poor. I have been quite disappointed by this camera. Buy another bridge camera from a reputable brand.
1451144
I would say no it is not good at doing super close up shots. You would need a camera with a macro lens to do that kind of photos.
954017
I know it may seem useless, but actually used it for a second camera.b&w; and digitals.
357972
It's not THE BEST for weddings, but I shoot a lot of car images at cars shows and it's crisp and clean for that. One of the best lenses I have heard of for wedding photography is the f2.8 24-70mm. I have done some people pics, with it and they turn out nicely. Wedding pics are not my forte' though.
246421
Yes, I shot a wedding last month and it worked great. Ultra fast recycle time.
1106223
This flash should be more than enough for the shooting you'd do with your camera. Take a close look at the feature set ...if you won't use a lot of the features on this flash, you can buy a cheaper one and still be happy.
1516436
I think that would be a better option than my DSLR. I'm planning on upgrading soon.
1089795
Yes! 100% I would recommend this camera for still picture ,bad side lenses are little expensive .
246705
My suggestion as a photographer is to skip out on the cheaper camera and spending more on a intuitive camera if you can. I use this camera for snap shots. I cannot really depend on it for quickness.
788646
For low light it will do for sure. I do beluce for sone action too, but not to much. Photographing groups pf friend together i had no problems lime "phantons" ir shades of people moving. It is not a pro camera but a long step from regular ines. If you know how to operate in manual yoy will be able to do it.My experience is only on automatic mode.
101691
This lens is great for overall use, however a standard 50mm in your camera mount are much cheaper and sharp enough for weddings. Most brides don't want every blemish to show.
1094069
If you are just starting out it will work. But if you become professional you will want to get a more expensive one with more features. As you get comfortable with your photographing you will want to be able to adjust various settings to your taste rather than just using a point and shoot camera.
1451145
Yes, it is a good camera for macro super close up shots. I use it for close-up shots all of the time. It is also good at low light shots of people.
676873
I seriously doubt it because the 'all the other accessories' for me would include auxiliary flash and some filters and...This is big enough for a POS camera and small accessories. OR a small digital recorder NOT A DSLR.
1576342
Absolutely, I didn't buy it for that but, during my granddaughters birthday party I unintentionally took a close up of her. It was so good that I had an 8x10 made. It would definitely take the place of an entry level digital camera.
328859
The D70s is very good for both. However, for low-light situations I strongly suggest a good flash. I shot four weddings with it using Nikon's SB-800 flash and got excellent results. If you're new to DSLRs, use "Auto" for everything except ISO. Adjust the ISO as needed for the particular lighting you're shooting in. I also suggest a photo editor such as Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop to bring out shadows, cropping, and adjusting white balance as needed.
1090116
I agree with A.J. Wells in that this isn't really a good question. It completely depends on so many different factors. I find that prime lenses (or "fixed" lenses) tend to be the best ones to use when photographing weddings because they are faster.