What is the weight of this lens, in grams? thank you.
1700120
Lens and hood weigh 186 grams.Placed inside the included storage case, 226 g hope this helps
260831
I don't know. I love my lens. Haven't had any problems with it. Wish i could buy a stronger one than 200mm. Sherry
604835
Disclaimer: I am not a photographer nor do I know much about optics. I own the Macro. Which is 470 grams as opposed to the 600+ grams of the std lens. Also my understanding is that even at high zoom it can be used as a Marco lens. E.g. I used my Nikon 200 mm at full zoom to look at a close object (2-3 feet away) and it would not focus where as the Sigma lens did.
740229
It is so heavy that you must have a very sturdy tripod. I have had on going trouble with the adapter. So much so that I have not used the lens for over 2 months.
1339285
I'd say about a pound to 20 oz. I trashed them about a year ago though when the eyepiece on one side fell apart. Cheap plastic. The optics were good while they lasted (only two years). I replaced them with a pair of Vortex Diamondbacks 8x32 which seem very ruggedly built.
1590731
Hello, That would be an impressive move with this lens! Considering it weighs about 40 pounds it would require some serious upper body strength! Thanks for the interest, UsedPhotoPro
1427900
Hi there, I´m not the seller, so I have no ideia the weight and length of the package, or stock. I´ve just bought the package and I am very happy with it. There is no issue with camera lenses, everything works ok, so far so good! Thanks.
884881
Metal. Some of the other parts are plastic and it helps with keeping the lens weight down. Excellent lens.
1378513
The monocular, with both lens caps on, weighs in at just under 13 ounces. It comes with a nice case, but it also has a belt clip attached. I really like mine and use it daily.
419338
It is definitely heavy -- feels like a lens that would be attached to a larger dslr -- but given the quality, I understand why it is so weighty. There is another lens that they offer that is a 200mm - not sure if the size/weight is the same, but if you need a long range quality lens, this one certainly is worth it. I definitely do use my 16-50mm on most days though.
1074768
hi,the weight with packing material is around 2 1/2 pounds.the lens alone is around 1.80 pds.
1463432
I don't know the total weight limit, but I use an Olympus em10 with a full fourThirds 70-300mm lens and adapter. That's about 4lbs.
205650
Mount weighs 4.8oz. the optic weighs 1oz.... grand total 5.8oz.... very light, do not even notice the extra weight.... Hope this helps bill
2249442
Not sure about the actual weight, but they are difficult to focus without a tripod. Strongly recommend you get one if you decide to purchase.
879559
Just over 28 oz. Heavy, but its a great scope for the moneyhttp://www.leapers.com/prod_detail.php?mitem=Optics&itemno;=SCP3-U416AOIEW
1378512
Metric measurement only I'm afraid :( it's 370 grams exactly with the lens caps on.
7736
I have not weighed it. However, it IS pretty heavy. You actually have to attach the lens to your tripod and then attach the camera to the lens. Then it is steady.