does this wallet meet the California 65 laws? does anyone know? has to do with cancer causing products
712472
Hello and thanks for writing. Sorry but we do not know if it meets that law.
480725
No Idea!! But it's freaked me out. I ordered these (didn't see the CA Prop warning) and Luvable Friends Bibs. When I received my Order Summary I saw a note about how "one or more of my items was subject to the CA Prop 65 law". How crazy that BABY stuff would have this warning slapped to it. Maybe it's not that big of a deal seeing as CA is the only state with this "law", but I'm not taking any chances. Returning both items as soon as they arrive!
727399
All nutritional supplements in California contain this warning due to Prop 65. I would not worry about it, because ALL supplements say this.
374957
I cannot find any tag/label which indicates that it contains cancer causing chemicals. That is not to say there aren't any proven cancer toxins since companies are not required to indicate that fact unless it is sold in California. Wish I could be of more help. I am concerned about toxicity in products too.
1139465
Prop. 65 is a CA State initiative. It does not necessarily mean it is harmful or carcinogenic. Call the manufacturer for more info.Here is an useful link on this Prop.: http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/p65faq.html
2146677
I do not know ...but with in 12 hours of purchasing it someone went on a buying spree with my credit card.so caution!!!!!
928834
All the information I've been able to find on Proposition 65 is pretty vague. It it supposed to warn consumers of "chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm" As far as I can tell, there is no thought given to the amount of these chemicals - some of which you can't escape in the manufacturing process. More info can be found here: http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/p65faq.html Although the most helpful line from the faq seems to be: "To request more information regarding the chemical exposures that are the basis of the warning, contact the manufacturer of the product." If I had to guess what chemical warranted the proposition 65 warning, I would guess cadmium.
159017
It shouldn't be...they wouldn't be allowed to sell it easily under FDA, and California, regs. I see that someone called Lenox and they said they meet federal lead standards. Best to call Lenox directly.
1775540
I don't remember seeing any tag. But trust me, I also have two of their wallets, and they are all high-quality products. I've been using one of their 'front pocket' wallets for over a year now and it looks like new, all the seams are still intact and nothing has ripped/scratched. So I would not care much where it was made, I can tell you it was well made :) - You will NOT find this quality for this price anywhere. I paid over $150 for a Samsonite portfolio that started failing after just a couple of months.
1165600
I never used it! I returned after the packing slip stated that according to proposition 65, they had to tell me this product will give me cancer and this notice only goes to CA residents in the USA
1143368
Proposition 65 requires the State to publish a list of chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. In other words. These gloves are manufactured with chemicals that the state of California considers cancerous or harmful. That's just what I got from researching it. Hope this helps
1231857
Yes, the warning is on the tag. It says: "The product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and/or birth defects or other reproductive harm. Wash hands after handling." I guess I'll be returning mine...
928832
Prop 65 -is not a standard, Unlike FDA and does not set a limit or standard no matter how small- It is A WARNING for people that some metal exists in the product.
936990
I have no special knowledge about that......I have purchased 6 in the last 5 yrs....all for different family members(3 for myself) in California.....have never had a problem with any of them....
1299854
I think that's only in CA, but this bag didn't come with any warnings. I can't imagine how it could be harmful, though.
2110521
I am not familiar with California Law, but here is a site that may help: http://survivaldealer.com/knife-laws.html I can't imagine a reason that this knife would be illegal anywhere, but then politicians think differently.
1218033
Yes, it does! Go to the Homak website. It shows the "California approved" seal on the description page. http://homakmfg.com/Security%20Site/Links/Catalogs/Homak%20Security%20Catalog%20PDF.pdf