Consumer Reports ranked this bagless at number 35. Does that sound right or do you think it should be higher?
1689014
I'd rate it higher--I'd give it 4.5 out of 5. If it had fancier attachments with a little more reach, It'd give it a 5 out of 5, but the attachments are not so important to me. I give it a 5 out of 5 for ease of emptying out the dust bin and ease of access to filter. I am also amazed at how well it picks up both on carpet and tile, especially for the price. And so easy to steer and get around. Still very happy with it.
1689015
I would say maybe 30%. It's pretty good. I had a Dyson and I loved it but it was way too heavy. The suction of this vacuum is pretty darn good. I think it is just a matter of preference really. The Shark advertizes a similar idea which Dyson had already come up with. So it's your pick.
1689016
I love the wind tunnel air it is very lightweight and easy to maneuver I have a regular Hoover wind tunnel that I purchased a few years ago so I was very familiar with all of the features. Really enjoy the stearability...it works beautifully.
1501944
I don't think it had a rated r value. Since it it has a combination of a thin layer of foam and air I would think it would be high. while I used it primarily on long flights to Alaska to save my butt I also used it on outings while in the bush. Butt never got cold.....if that helps
2233788
I would think that +/- 7% is probably within the tolerance of the various components and you're running right at that limit. Yes, I think you should probably order up.
1607148
Hey kevin. I think its just good enough. I haven't had a chance to use mine yet but of the same thinking. As long as I keep it with me and on my back while transporting it it should be ok...hope that helps
638051
NO....I am guessing it is not comfortable at minus 30 degrees. it is comfortable to high teens Fahrenheit when accompanied by light wool or flannel blanket directly against your body as insulation AND comforter or wool blanket over the top of the bag. It is a seriously comfortable, well constructed bag. Excellent value. I HIGHLY recommend it! Soon will be entering the third year of use.....estimating 300 nights of use altogether - still like brand new, fresh as a daisy. One thing to note...it is heavy in weight - you will not want to move it around much. In winter mine lives in the back of my SUV.ALL THE BEST! NO....I am guessing it is not comfortable at minus 30 degrees. it is comfortable to high teens Fahrenheit when accompanied by light wool or flannel blanket directly against your body as insulation AND comforter or wool blanket over the top of the bag. It is a seriously comfortable, well constructed bag. Excellent value. I HIGHLY recommend it! Soon will be entering the third year of use.....estimating 300 nights of use altogether - still like brand new, fresh as a daisy. One thing to note...it is heavy in weight - you will not want to move it around much. In winter mine lives in the back of... » Read More NO....I am guessing it is not comfortable at minus 30 degrees. it is comfortable to high teens Fahrenheit when accompanied by light wool or flannel blanket directly against your body as insulation AND comforter or wool blanket over the top of the bag. It is a seriously comfortable, well constructed bag. Excellent value. I HIGHLY recommend it! Soon will be entering the third year of use.....estimating 300 nights of use altogether - still like brand new, fresh as a daisy. One thing to note...it is heavy in weight - you will not want to move it around much. In winter mine lives in the back of my SUV.ALL THE BEST! « Show Less
1178120
Thin is the operative word here. Without breaking out the micrometer I'd say the bags are about the same thickness as your average gym bag. The cases have minimal padding so be forewarned that they will offer little protection for anything other than scratches and moisture. That being said the overall quality of the bags, to include the integrity of the exterior shell/material and stitching, is good. The interior lining is marginal and prone to rips and tears. I would give an overall grade of B- due to the fact that they offer the anticipated and reasonable level of protection for my purposes which is commensurate with the price paid. Definitely not for hardcore touring or rough handling. Thin is the operative word here. Without breaking out the micrometer I'd say the bags are about the same thickness as your average gym bag. The cases have minimal padding so be forewarned that they will offer little protection for anything other than scratches and moisture. That being said the overall quality of the bags, to include the integrity of the exterior shell/material and stitching, is good. The interior lining is marginal and prone to rips and tears. I would give an overall grade of B- due to the fact that they offer the anticipated and reasonable level of protection for my... » Read More Thin is the operative word here. Without breaking out the micrometer I'd say the bags are about the same thickness as your average gym bag. The cases have minimal padding so be forewarned that they will offer little protection for anything other than scratches and moisture. That being said the overall quality of the bags, to include the integrity of the exterior shell/material and stitching, is good. The interior lining is marginal and prone to rips and tears. I would give an overall grade of B- due to the fact that they offer the anticipated and reasonable level of protection for my purposes which is commensurate with the price paid. Definitely not for hardcore touring or rough handling. « Show Less
871826
I believe it was rated at 300-350 somewhere in that range. Should be on the mfg website if you google it.I have used it up to 260# with no problem.
394590
That can't be right. If Amazon (who requested that i respond to this question) matched me correctly to this item then I only got six bags , not the sixty as advertised. However you have a helluva claim for the other 54 bags if they got it wrong!
646991
I wouldn't want to sleep in the green bag any lower than 55. The black one can go to 30. Combine for around 0, Add bivy for -10.
310070
A little late to the discussion, but I just want to point out that Consumer Reports ranks the WD-Y57 much higher than the other model. A score of 69 vs 63. The top score in the category is 74.
734799
I have only used one bag with this platform. The Title boxing gyro balanced small bag. In my opinion the return speed is excellent. My only complaint with this platform is that the height adjustment system is difficult.
3803
I don't know, but I can tell you it was highly rated in Consumer Reports. I am very satisfied with it's simplicity.
367046
I say no. I purchased a bag because it was smaller. I consider myself as a medium man. Suggesting, I say no. I purchased a bag because it was smaller. I consider myself as a medium man. Suggesting, spend a little extra money get a better bet.
1561539
In the past the bags on amazon were sold at the unfilled price; the one currently up is listed as filled, and is sold at the filled price. If you have the option, get a filled bag; the time, effort, and cost of filling it yourself isn't worth the savings.
1968799
Sorry, I don't know. I upgraded to the 1,000 bag count from another manufacturer.
370652
Not sure. I bought this toy last year. As best that I can remember it was a little higher but not that much. I notice it has more reviews maybe its more popular.
2077324
Are these answers from the company or other buyers b/c I am *STILL* confused if this would provide me 48* bags!!!!???