Is the over all length of the shorts, shortens when waist line is decreased in size? Meaning 30 and a 32 in have the same length?
327089
Mine are a little shorter than I usually like. They stop right at the knees and I would like them to go just a little past. But since they are really meant to be tactical it makes sense that they would allow for better running and such. I think the length is proportional to the waist number.
327090
I only got the one size so I don't know for sure...sorry. These are good looking shorts with high quality zippers/snaps. But they are a little pricey. If you can get them for a good price you will not be disappointed.
327091
Yes, they are all the same length. There is also a longer version that is 11". Great shorts, have bought many pair.
612828
Sorry,I`m not sure.I think this should be related to your muscle mass. I am 5 feet 7 inches, about 154 pounds, waist 29, I was wearing S. My friend is about 5 feet 6 inches, is about 154 pounds, waist 30, also wear s code, and feeling unable to use M . I guess you could try M or L , of course, this depends on your muscle mass, waist circumference is a more direct and easily measured data.
60987
Probably defect... My husband wears a 32 waist in jeans, and he's had two pairs of these pants in a 32 waist that both fit the same... Just a bit roomier than a 32 jean. (He tried to go down to a 30, but that was much too snug.)
885345
These shorts, which I like a lot, are roomy in the seat and thighs, and I don't think there's anything you can do about that. But they do run a little large. I wear a 2x waist in most cases (it depends on where pants are made, etc., etc. I'm a big guy), and I bought the 2x. They fit great when I put them on. What I find is that, because they're made of cotton, the waist stretches throughout the day, enough for me to cinch my belt one hole tighter sometime in the middle of the day. But as I say, I love these shorts, and I'm okay with them loosening up somewhat. But a 1X or an XL would have been to smalll for me, even though they run somewhat large. Hope this is helpful. These shorts, which I like a lot, are roomy in the seat and thighs, and I don't think there's anything you can do about that. But they do run a little large. I wear a 2x waist in most cases (it depends on where pants are made, etc., etc. I'm a big guy), and I bought the 2x. They fit great when I put them on. What I find is that, because they're made of cotton, the waist stretches throughout the day, enough for me to cinch my belt one hole tighter sometime in the middle of the day. But as I say, I love these shorts, and I'm okay with them loosening up somewhat. But a 1X or an XL would have... » Read More These shorts, which I like a lot, are roomy in the seat and thighs, and I don't think there's anything you can do about that. But they do run a little large. I wear a 2x waist in most cases (it depends on where pants are made, etc., etc. I'm a big guy), and I bought the 2x. They fit great when I put them on. What I find is that, because they're made of cotton, the waist stretches throughout the day, enough for me to cinch my belt one hole tighter sometime in the middle of the day. But as I say, I love these shorts, and I'm okay with them loosening up somewhat. But a 1X or an XL would have been to smalll for me, even though they run somewhat large. Hope this is helpful. « Show Less
37187
My best guess is that it will work. I am a 5'2" female and have the same waist. I do not struggle to put on the small shorts on, but I like them that way.
442902
They do come in a 30" inseam (that's what I bought).Of course they can be altered like regular pants.They are the best pants I've ever bought.
3607
I think so. I have a 104cm waist/100cm hips and wear the 34's comfortably. The 36's (and i wear loose fit 36 jeans) are a little on the large side, and while usable, the 34's are much better for me. I assume the 30/32 would be similar.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
31509
I don't think that they are offered in different lengths, I'm short and the waist is extremely long on me, but because they are very thin they fold over easily. Perhaps this is to benefit taller individuals.
67384
I have a 30" waist and the size Small fits perfectly. It would probably fit a 28" waist since it is quite stretchy but I obviously cant say for sure. I think my inseam is 32". I wasn't concerned about an exact length because they are a base layer. And, I can't speak for larger sizes.
1136374
There is no difference as far as make. The Extended, I think, are for those longer legged folks.. I rodered mine in 32 long as a true 32 is to short and the 34's are way to long.. So basically it's a 33 inch inseam.
40172
If you want true compression with 31" waist, small. I'm 32 with a tape measure and have the small size. I do prefer to roll the waistband down when wearing them.
908158
No really for sure but I have a size 30 inch waist and the strings wrap around me twice. Hope that helps.
37467
Long, in my opinion. But I like shorts (workout, at least) to fall above the kneecap. I'd guess they are somewhere a little less than 13" inseam.
768646
Not sure but my med. has a waist draw string that would fit 30 to 35 easily
2172335
I have 3 pairs that I turned into shorts (2 bought early 2013, 1 bought Dec 2013). Neither of the first 2 shrank the year a wore them as pants. The 3rd were turned into shorts just after purchase. I can't comment on the length, but the waist (36) has not gotten tighter. Then again, and this is doubtful, I could have lost an inch along my waist.As a side note, I really wish Amazon carried these. It really looks like they are burning through their left over inventory, and not restocking.
33470
Hi Peter, Can't answer that for you. Myself, I am a 33 waist by 34 Long. My order was Medium in waist and 34 Long. I believe their is enough waist play after me wearing mine with the elastic waist band to help give you the comfort you need. These are my second pair and I really like them for comfort and hiking.