Will a person test positive from second hand smoke exposure only?
1715789
No, a light red line might appear but it would be very very faint and you will still pass it.
1715790
This test will look for nicotine in your blood, if it is there you will have a positive result. If your blood do not have any, it will be negative.Second hand smoke question is really a subjective question and not related to this product.When i quit smoking, i avoided second hand smoke as much as i can, but there were instances where i am travelling with someone who was smoking, But i never tested after that.
1307806
Yes, as long as there is proper ventilation for the smoke you'll be fine. The unit itself does not get hot on the outside, it's contained on the inside and I have used it numerous times in my garage even with the doors open when it has been raining. Shouldn't be a problem.
1571630
Not really, a faint line will indicate a small trace. A dark solid line indicates no presence of nicotine.
1696300
Consider it as. he stopped smoking but maybe around people who smoke. my lawyer told me in some cases his clients have failed just because its a test where you either pass or fail and it doesn't discriminate if its 2nd hand or not.. my advice is smile hug your son and buy him a nice icecream Sunday :) (if its weed, other than that keep hitting him) xD
1571628
No it doesn't show the strength. It lets you know if nicotine is present in the urine sample.
309431
I had no idea since I don't smoke in the house. It's kind hard to answer that since this because it's for my tenant in the back house. Sorry
1422670
Depends on the size of your container and the temp of where you are using it. I'm gonna say that in general the answer to your question will be a definite "no". But if you are using a real small smoker and it's warm outside, it's possible. This is designed to be a cold smoker, though...not for heat.
326677
When using the unit for the first time, you may notice a fine smoke haze. This is normal. It is due to the initial heating of internal components. You shouldn't experience smoking after initial use.
316038
I believe so. Smoke detectors detect tiny particulates in the air. Paint and varnish smells have been known to set them off.
168372
No. It is OK to remedy smoke in a car but it takes closing the small place up for a while and multiple application. My wife is a travel agent and says there are smoke free rooms - ask for one.
1666117
No experience with such things, but seriously doubt that anything but a 'clean room' at medical or manufacturing facility could clean the sorry fumes of burning tobacco. Ask your smoking neighbors to move, or consider the same for yourself.
1457537
Yes, 16 ppm is not an unusual reading. That is the peak reading, not the current reading. Many activities in a home can cause a short spike in CO levels, and 16 ppm for a short period is nothing to worry about. However, with this detector, you don't actually know how long you've been exposed to 16 ppm, and if it is a constant exposure, it exceeds EPA and WHO exposure limits for 24 hours.
736977
No. Not likely. If you read the attaching documents it saids the results should be read within specified time. After minutes of the test the results will be compromised. In your case a month. We don't know what compounds from the environment in which u saved it has reacted to show two lines. And the chemical due ant have the active agent after that long. Read the documents. Or see a doctor if u have doubts
1827960
I have seen small variances, but it doesn't have anything to do with the concentration because I tested them on someone who had smoked of course it was + , one who had not smoked in 30 days- neg, and someone who has never smoked also neg but the line was pretty much the same shade. Also, we did get a negative reading and probation got a pos one time and that was well after anything had been ingested.
1571627
No. It's supposed to either detected or not. I think the kit pamphlet says it's detectable down to 200. Most of the literature backed that up. But I had a friend take it who is a smoker and it negative for him. It should have been positive since he smokes daily. The test is unreliable.
1219661
this only detects smoke/steam; it does not detect carbon monoxide. It would be useful anywhere that you can hear it.
379004
Angelo, can not answer that true-fully because we do not smoke--I can tell you that once I started using It the dust in the back room was eliminated. It does have two filters-one Is a He-pa filter which traps the tiniest of particles.