other than price, is there any difference between the 120 &amp; the 130 model
35553
Have never used the 120 . . . Bought the 130 . . . . maybe it was the condition of my knives . . . but it took 30-40 minutes per knife . . . many, many times through the machine. I have a 30+ year old set (7) of J. A. Henkel knives. Good shape now.
1133930
I own both and the are essentially identical except in one aspect. They are the same size and capacity and made with the same parts and electronic controls. This difference is that the 700, that I bought 9 years ago, included a special KF antimicrobial filter in it that is not mentioned in the new 220. It obviously cut the mfr's cost but has no impact on the softening ability of the unit that I've now owned a few months, running flawlessly. Very easy to install and set-up so long as you provide the in and out plumbing.
1880664
Yes but the 120 rtf model also brings the same transmitter. Get the 120 bnf.
1339501
I think there is no difference. It depends on the price. You will be able to choose better one for you. Good luck.
2272077
The 220 has Two max speeds (400 & 1400 rpm) while the 120 has One max speed (650 rpm.) Also, torque is 310 vs 115 inch/lbs. The B&D site really sucks, http://www.blackanddecker.com/allproducts/20-volt-drills.aspx
661372
The sharpening disks for the 130 are different. For the 130: 100% diamond stage in stage 1; super hardened miniature steel in stage 2; and flexible stropping disks in stage 3. The disks are different on the 120. The grit is diamond for stages 1 and 2, and a "patented" material for disk 3. It's great for thin kitchen knives. I have the 120.
27096
THe 500 refreshes 120 HZ. The 400 refreshes at 60HZ. Salesman said that was the only difference.
258605
based on the reviews here, the 650 looks more solid. better sat reception, quicker response time, fewer glitches. but the 750 has the newer/better interface and does multipoint routing. i'm getting the 750, and if the glitches are too much of a pain, i'll exchange it for a 650.
590562
I think the only difference between the 2 are the preprogrammed games, recipes, etc. on the 750. And the touch of color which borders all sides on the 750 but only the top and bottom of the 650.
1288625
I own th extreme 2. The main differences I could see were NO cable adjustments are needed on the extreme model, and the addition of middle pulleys on the extreme. I viewed both of these as significant upgrades, and opted for the more expensive machine. I have not been dissatisfied.
1046336
I noticed that also. Right now the 650 is cheaper than the 630 model. I'm going with the 630 because of the matte finish on the screen. Great pricing for both.
1876459
I have found two other differences - 6350 comes with quad stand and WiFi ready; 5500 - square stand and WiFi capable. Coming to difference in refresh rate, as long as you buy the TV less than 39" 60Hz is absolutely fine, 120 is just a hype for 32" version. 5500 is VFM. 6350 is bit of luxury. Hope that answers your question.
740239
Looking at the descriptions of both, it has the 101 version is 4 ounces heavier and is made of metal. The 130 is made of durable ABS plastic construction; brushed-metal casing. Funny that the metal and heavier 101 version is cheaper...
482830
My take on the UL20A vs. the 1201N is as follows; If you want to pay $80 less, less battery life, less weight, but be able to play 1080P media and games, then get the 1201N. Otherwise, get the UL20A. The battery life on the 1201N isn't that bad, I can get 4.5 hours or so with medium usage, maybe 2-3 if I play 1080P media continuously. It's pretty decent for its capabilities.
889701
The 160 can support multiple devices (up to 5) at one time whereas the 150/150a can only support one. 150a is the North American edition, updated from the 150.
2241782
I've owned both and feel pretty strongly that the digital is worth the 130. My Analogs are just rugged peltors, where the digitals are a dream.
1184217
The 180 has 2 nozzles. The 120 just has one. I think I'd go with the 180. It doesn't cost much more.