What is difference between this and the DP4000?
1577190
I do not know. My husband likes Makita so that is why I purchased this item.
1577191
I'm sorry but we never purchased/used the DP400- so do not have an accurate answer to your question
1283707
The P320 is the newer model. I have been well pleased with the overall operation, easy to use and can truly recommend it.
1817460
Yes, plus the 3200 costs more. I'm very happy with the BDPS1200. I had to buy an HDMI cable, but that did not cost much (it does not come with a cable).
1211499
I think depending on your application you may not notice a difference. If your doing a lot of post processing with your computer you may see some faster completion times with the 4820 as it's a more robust processor (a wee bit), but for general purpose usage you're not going to notice the difference.
2023902
I'll be able to do a direct comparison soon, as I've got a PX312 coming in, after purchasing the VN-302PC. The specs and features are very nearly clones of each other, but I've found that the Olympus lacks some rather basic abilities that the Sony covers, such as a means of moving files between the 5 folders for organization. Also, the files recorded on the internal memory can't be moved over to the external memory card through the recorder; though it's easy enough to do when connected to a PC. It shows up as two separate drives on the PC, and the files remain uniquely named whether recorded on internal or external memory, so it's a simple matter to just copy them over. (If they reused file numbers on int vs ext memory then there would be an added complication of renaming before copying). I'd rather that the file names included the timestamp, like some other recorders do, but neither of these do that. Record quality of the Olympus is fine, so if the Sony does just as well, the Sony has more comprehensive features. The file erase process is better on the Sony as well, because it plays back the recording you're about to erase for confirmation before recording. With the Olympus you have to stop the playback on the target file first and be careful that it didn't advance to the next file, and watch the screen for the sequence of prompts to follow through with the delete process. I think the Sony method for deleting is better because it can be initiated while the target file is playing, and the playback of the recording as confirmation has less potential for inadvertently deleting the wrong recording. I believe the Sony also retains the time for at least a minute during battery changes, while the Olympus loses an hour or two and needs to be reset. It's not very significant since the batteries last so long, but so far, all the pros have been on the Sony side. When I get the Sony in hand I'll see if it actually performs as well as the Olympus
2097088
Not really sure about that. I don't carry it around usually. I am using AH-C300 when I'm on-the-go. It's more like a more portable version of AH-D400. =)
1073948
No, but the price is better than the D4 and D3S. Honestly if you have to crank your ISO beyond 3200 spend the extra $4,000 on the D4.
355063
From what I can tell - nothing. It appears to have all the same features as the 400.
189273
As far as I can tell, the only difference is that the BDT310 has 2 HDMI outputs and can playback MPEG2 / AVCHD
1446949
Not sure but I have tried both and it serves the same functions and I see no difference in both except pricing.
11395
Hi, I never had the D3200...so I could not tell. I got the Nikon after using an Olympus and I can tell the colors are more vibrant and the shutting speed (sports) is way faster. I'm no expert so I would suggest you do some research online in order to compare the 2 Nikon cameras. :)
1627197
The ep4000 is more powerful than xls 1500. I own both amps, neither specifications are misleading you just hace to understand how amps work.
1195388
Nathan, you want to buy the Sony MEXBT4100P because the 3100 only has blue available and the 4100 has variable colors. The 4100 also will attach to your instrument pannel dimmer where the 3100 has only bright verses dim. When you go on Sony's website and compare the two these are the only two differences between the two. Amazon price difference right now is $10 where last month it was $30.
826639
I went for the dn1000 instead of the 810, because of the GUI. Other than that I really didnt see much of a difference in spec wise. My friend has the 810 and I will be receiving mine next week.
2281278
The main difference I see is the V500 has a higher scan resolution (6400x9600) as opposed to the V300's 4800x9600 res. Also, the V300 does not have Digital ICE capabilities which the V500 has. Personally, I've been using the V500 for archiving 35mm negatives, and not having the ICE technology for removing scratches, dust, and other imperfections IS A DEAL BREAKER! You have no idea how much time you'll save by using ICE to clean up those old negatives instead of doing touching them up by hand. ICE technology works very well! The scanning software Epson ships with their scanners is very clunky and quirky to say the least, but it gets the job done. I see the V300 as a document scanner with limited photo scanning capabilities. The V500 is definitely the best photo scanner bang for the buck bar none!
1764474
I have both the 3540 (work) and the 3530 (home). The only difference that I really noted was that the 3540 has a larger interface display panel and all functions are accessed through the touchscreen interface panel. The 3530 has a smaller display panel and touch panel buttons that are used to access the printer's features (there is a number pad and arrows on the 3530 that you use to choose options, whereas on the 3540 you touch items on the display itself). Otherwise they appear to work the same and quite well. I am very pleased with them and would recommend either. As for the cost difference, I don't know. When I purchased them, the 3540 cost more than the 3530.
1365911
I didn't have a T400 so not sure..I had used this in T60. Overall I am okay with the performance based on the price paid