Is there a sound quality between the at2020 plus and regular at2020? I cant decided between the two?
1593057
The plus has a headphone jack on the mic. The timing of your recording will be closer to the track that your are listening to. I record a song on one track using my guitar, then plug my headphones into the input jack on the mic while recording the singing track. Without the plus, I can use the headphone jack on my PC, but I must do a slight adjustment to the 2nd track to line up with the guitar timing. So basically, the plus has a more accurate timing while listening through a headphone on the mic. The sound quality should be the same.
1593058
I really don't know what the difference is as I only checked the one I have and I like it very much.
230501
I don't know about the sound quality. I bought the E280 instead of the view because the E280 has a replaceable battery. I like it a lot so far. I had an iPod mini previously.
1159495
I have a pretty loud air-purifier and computer as well, and the AT2020 does a good job of not picking up those ambient noises quite well! Most of my recordings are whisper quiet in the background. Hope this helps!
771559
I have the Bose QC15, IMHO, not worth the money. More hype than anything. At least with the Beats, you get bass.
711053
I was the one that posted the comparison of sound between the 400 and the 210. The 210 is easily superior in sound. I am quite surprised no one else has brought this up. Doesn't anyone care about good stereo sound quality through their ear plugs?
1433289
Hello, the A7 uses your WIFI network, and it has a better sound quality. Not sure if the price difference is worth it buy they are both great products, cheers!
452346
Yeah, I bought a pair of these and brought them to the office. My boss has a pair of QC2's and we compared them side by side. The ANC's do leak noise considerably more than the Bose. You can test them on your head with a partner, or you can turn the cups down on a table and listen for the leakage. I decided to send mine back and get the Bose instead. I also had issues with some very mild static on the ANC's on a flight last week - very slight, but it was there none-the-less.
509654
I have recently tried the Bose equivalent to the ATH-ANC9. I prefer the Bose head phones, because the ATH-ANC9 was lacking in noise canceling ability however I did notice the sound quality of the ATH-ANC9 has diminished over since I have bought them.
2146399
I own both the QC-15 and the A20. Sound quality from both very similar, however the A20 is better at reducingoutside aircraft noise. A microphone adaptor from Ufly Mike allows the QC-15 to be used as an aviation headset.
1468739
Unfortunately, I haven't experienced the 170. But I have owned similarly priced Sony and I can say the 180 is far superior - zero noise, nada. It has the cleanest sound I have heard. I do have a friend with the 170 and I believe it has a surround sound mode but I'm not sure so you may want to check that out. I also am able to add a second headset for the same transmitter on the 180 (perhaps up to four total - I think?), not sure if you can do that with the 170 but worth checking out if it is an issue. The 180 is "open" so you can hear other sounds going on which in my case allows me to hear when my wife is talking to me - haven't decided if that is a positive. Be well. Unfortunately, I haven't experienced the 170. But I have owned similarly priced Sony and I can say the 180 is far superior - zero noise, nada. It has the cleanest sound I have heard. I do have a friend with the 170 and I believe it has a surround sound mode but I'm not sure so you may want to check that out. I also am able to add a second headset for the same transmitter on the 180 (perhaps up to four total - I think?), not sure if you can do that with the 170 but worth checking out if it is an issue. The 180 is "open" so you can hear other sounds going on which in my case allows... » Read More Unfortunately, I haven't experienced the 170. But I have owned similarly priced Sony and I can say the 180 is far superior - zero noise, nada. It has the cleanest sound I have heard. I do have a friend with the 170 and I believe it has a surround sound mode but I'm not sure so you may want to check that out. I also am able to add a second headset for the same transmitter on the 180 (perhaps up to four total - I think?), not sure if you can do that with the 170 but worth checking out if it is an issue. The 180 is "open" so you can hear other sounds going on which in my case allows me to hear when my wife is talking to me - haven't decided if that is a positive. Be well. « Show Less
2146398
I own both the QC-15 and the A20. Sound quality from both very similar, however the A20 is better at reducing outside aircraft noise. A microphone adaptor from Ufly Mike allows the QC-15 to be used as an aviation headset.
2079766
i have a sennheiser and i still use it cause there is quality in it too.but there is no comparison cause if i can go back in time i would have bought Bose QuietComfort.and it really helps when you are in an airplane if there is a kid crying you would hear nothing. ^_^
305077
The pro700's had more bass to them but it really muffled the other ranges to the point that I really didn't like the sound. The ATH-M50's are my favorite headphone I've tried yet. Good rounded sound but decent bass too. I love them. Also the M50's are much more comfortable.
1062673
I can't say I know! I see people with both types and have never asked which they prefer. I purchased Sennheiser because of familiarity with the brand. Felt like for the price these are a great value (for my taste!). Good luck!
578243
Hey Hunter, the sound of these cans are much more balanced than the ATH-M50s (with the NC off, naturally). The treble is much less piercing than the m50s, and the low end is much tighter as compared to the m50s. Especially with the price drop, I would say that the ue6000s are a much better buy than m50s given they are comparably priced.
1900006
Yes the A1 has better sound, if you don't need the battery then go with the A1, but the A3 still has great sound
2252344
Well, you asked the right person, since I own and use both. While I love Klipsch generally, and regard it as overall the top value brand, (5.1 home theater, etc.) I was really blown away by the performance of the A2+. The only handicap I have in answering you is I've used the A2 with a sub controlled by an inexpensive but wonderful preamp (the gemini pa-7000) since day one. But this is revealing-- I had to reduce the crossover to only 80 cycles -- that's real speaker territory. So, I'd call the addition of a sub a nice add-on but far from necessary. If anything, I find these little guys a bit bassy if anything. Naturally, a lot depends on your environment. Mine's a kitchen -- very flattering acoustically. Bottom line is the A2+ is more the 'real deal' since you have the option juice it up, making it a 'system,' later. There's no hint of being 'just a computer speaker.' Overall, while I like my 2.1's fine, I love my A2s.