ES8249s or the ES8109S? Has anyone used both and prefiers one over the other?
1574004
I have wasted so much $$ on razors and all brand name shavers until now. This particular Panasonic model (ES8109S) has outdone itself. With the best of razors or wet/dry shavers I've had, it's taken me a minimum of at least 25 - 30 minutes of shaving and I still end up with ingrown hairs or bumps, nicks or scratches. I used this Panasonic model and WHAT A DIFFERENCE it has made in my life!!. I tend to have very thick and course hair, especially under my chin. This little gadget has managed somehow to leave my face ultra smooth within 3 minutes of passing it over my face WITHOUT having to press it against my skin in order to reach the short stubbles. I am so happy with it that I am seriously considering purchasing a 2nd one as a backup!
1870944
I can't answer whether it works with the ES8109. I bought it for my ES8103 and it does work with that model.
1482596
I'm pretty sure the 5088 is just an older version of the 5099. The 5099 has an idiot button to ease in the setup operation, but to be honest, I have no idea how it's suppose to work. I never used the button. I just plugged it in and everything worked. As for differences between the two. I say get the cheaper. They're both the same.
115217
10bII+ has more equation functions than the standard 10bII. If you are going to use it for a basic fiance class you will be fine with either, but I think they are they same price so you will just get more with 10bII+, also rumor has it that the 10bII+ runs a bit faster, however that is what my professor told me, as I didn't really get to compare that theory.
1593252
I don't really know. The one I have is from my mother-in-law and has been in use since at least 1940 but is a Presto. For the price though it would be worth trying it.Sorry I cannot be of more help.
460598
If you are going with a Firewire unit I would go with the Saffire Pro 40 over the Presonus. I've tried several new Presonus Firewire interface units and they all had hardware problems. However, you should also consider USB connected devices. The best Latency I could get with my Saffire Pro 40 was 11ms. I now have a Roland Octa-Capture (USB) and I can get 6ms Latency with solid results.
1595067
I have personally found the 1.0 set up better for clear. Gives more control on the amount of clear u put on.
1520461
I don't know. I am very happy with the 837409 and didn't compare it with 837450.
331800
To be completely honest, the XTR-435 from whistler works much better. The CR85 works decent enough but not as effectively as the XTR model which I highly recommend. :)
674066
The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted towards retail consumers, while the SB6180 is targeted towards businesses or OEM use.
428551
Not sure what you mean by S1, S2 inputs. The TH6220 has only a single combination Emer/Aux signal input not separate inputs. My opinion is that this Honeywell should have separate inputs for Emer and Aux and is not a good choice if you have a 2 stage heat pump like mine. I tried it for 2 months and hated it. I replaced it with a Braeburn 2220 which for me (an engineer) is close to perfect because it allows many user settings. Check with your code people see if they mean separate Emer and Aux inputs by S1, S2.
2124961
The newer model 902400 is lighter and uses the lithium ion batt. Which offers more run time and is much smaller in size. This is the latest model from Paslode.
1024790
Haven't used the HP. The Nspire cx CAS is very nice. I have no complaints. The user interface is simple enough to use for quick computation and capable enough to do a lot more. I have the TI Software but haven't tried to write my own programs yet, but this software will make it quite nice should I need to. I'm guessing you'll be working with complex numbers, matrices, linear algebra stuff and the Nspire is a champ for all of those and more. By the way, make sure you get the CAS version.
1024792
Haven't used the HP. The Nspire cx CAS is very nice. I have no complaints. The user interface is simple enough to use for quick computation and capable enough to do a lot more.I have the TI Software but haven't tried to write my own programs yet, but this software will make it quite nice should I need to. I'm guessing you'll be working with complex numbers, matrices, linear algebra stuff and the Nspire is a champ for all of those and more.By the way, make sure you get the CAS version.
1195711
I just upgraded my 8600 plus to the 8620 today and have aleady noticed alot of little enhacements. The automatic document feeder is more reliable and handles larger loads. Duplex printing is much faster. The output tray is less sticky and doesn't jam as easily when you pull it out.
2253882
Sorry, I am not familiar with the 2 systems you mentioned. But, for a desktop system, I am totally satisfied with their performance. They are not a big part of the cost of the IRMS300 so you could swap them out if you didn't like them.
1644713
The Only HP I've used is the HB 10BII. I'm never gave it a chance, been bias towards TI. Currently using the TI-84 Plus silver edition. Like that the best so for IRR, Eff, Npv, etc...