Why is HDR-SR1 better then DCR-SR100 when it has lower video resolution? I'm confused why HDR-SR1 is twice more expensive then DCR-SR100?DCR-SR100 spec says that it records video with 2048K pixels resolution while HDR-SR1 with max of 1434K pixels.The same for pixel gross: 3310K for DCR one and 2100K for HDR.I understand that HDR-SR1 has high def video output. But with lower video quality is it worth the price?Am I missing something? Why is HDR-SR1 better then DCR-SR100 when it has lower video resolution? I'm confused why HDR-SR1 is twice more expensive then DCR-SR100?DCR-SR100 spec says that it records video... » Read More Why is HDR-SR1 better then DCR-SR100 when it has lower video resolution? I'm confused why HDR-SR1 is twice more expensive then DCR-SR100?DCR-SR100 spec says that it records video with 2048K pixels resolution while HDR-SR1 with max of 1434K pixels.The same for pixel gross: 3310K for DCR one and 2100K for HDR.I understand that HDR-SR1 has high def video output. But with lower video quality is it worth the price?Am I missing something? « Show Less
619204
I think it's the niche market and Sony is charging premium for it. The price should go down or they will try to match the specs in next few weeks.
1576126
Yes, I later found that DCR-SR100 records DVD quality video (720x480 resolution). I'd got confused as it is not explicitly mentioned anywhere on the product detail page (http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DCR-SR100-Handycam-Camcorder-Optical/dp/tech-data/B000E1B29I).
1098984
Looks like Sony has stopped production of HDR SR11 and HDR SR12. That may account for higher prices of these good camcorders now. Weirdly, HDR SR10 still shows up at sony website.
69010
"video on DSLRs is entirely different from camcorders" - in what way? I have always heard that camcorder video is vastly superior - and if this is true, why pay for good video on a DSLR?
684030
120 basically doubles the refresh rate of the images. That is very good especially if you like sports. .. I had a Sony that I returned because it said it was 1080 pixels but it was really only 720... don't you hate being lied to? I do...
2281136
i have been using this camcorder for many years now, its not 1080p recorder, but its amazing cam, easy to use.and regarding the dvd burning ? the package contains pinnacle studio for dvd burning. but i didnt use it, i am not saying its not good, but i used windows movie maker and sony vegas for burning my dvds. which is all good for my taste.hope this helps
1254698
The number o megapixals is only part of the what makes a good camera.This camera supports 24p in the video. records at 240fps in video. has panorama built into camera, is a CMOS vs most cheaper being CCD, It has a higher resolution screen at 461 dots , 20x Zoom, The light sensitivity is 3,200ISO vs others at 800 ISO, It shoots more pictures faster than less expensive cameras 3.2 Photos ps. I frequently shoot photos while Horse Riding, This camera gives me much crisper photos. Other cameras I've owned always seemed to be slightly blurred because the horse just won't hold totally still. Because of this cameras faster speed, my photos turn out much better than most 16m cameras. The number o megapixals is only part of the what makes a good camera.This camera supports 24p in the video. records at 240fps in video. has panorama built into camera, is a CMOS vs most cheaper being CCD, It has a higher resolution screen at 461 dots , 20x Zoom, The light sensitivity is 3,200ISO vs others at 800 ISO, It shoots more pictures faster than less expensive cameras 3.2 Photos ps. I frequently shoot photos while Horse Riding, This camera gives me much crisper photos. Other cameras I've owned always seemed to be slightly blurred because the horse just won't hold totally still.... » Read More The number o megapixals is only part of the what makes a good camera.This camera supports 24p in the video. records at 240fps in video. has panorama built into camera, is a CMOS vs most cheaper being CCD, It has a higher resolution screen at 461 dots , 20x Zoom, The light sensitivity is 3,200ISO vs others at 800 ISO, It shoots more pictures faster than less expensive cameras 3.2 Photos ps. I frequently shoot photos while Horse Riding, This camera gives me much crisper photos. Other cameras I've owned always seemed to be slightly blurred because the horse just won't hold totally still. Because of this cameras faster speed, my photos turn out much better than most 16m cameras. « Show Less
1185245
The 7500 has a camera, has Smart features (I.e. using hand as a mouse), better micro dimming (greater contrast between lights and darks) and a higher cmr. I'm not exactly sure what cmr is (nor any of the other measurements other brands use) but from what I observed the 7500 picture seems to be more vibrant and motion is more fluid. Hope that helped
329104
I had a similar dilemma. I just had a baby in December and wanted a camcorder for home videos. After hours of research I decided the Sony DCR-SR300 was the best HDD camcorder out there and bought it... so far so good! It also takes great pictures, although with each video you're limited in the number of pictures you can take (don't know if it's the same issue with the JVC Everio).
449718
I do not know the exact answer, but my experience as a videographer tells me, that most likely there is no difference. The most significant step up would be Sony DVM 63HD tapes that are of a really higher quality, and can record in two formats. The are also very expensive.
722141
Frank, thanks a million for your comparison review of the SR100 vs SR300. I am dissapointed in the low light video's of my SR100 and thought the SR300 would be better as the low light lux specs are better. After reading your review of the low indoor video quality of the SR300 I will stay with my SR100. I shoot mostly indoors so the quality of indoor video's are important to me. Dean M.
1738615
I've tried both and for me the extra $100 is beyond well worth it. S100 has much better low light performance and overall picture quality(although 110HS is very good). Video looks substantially better to me as well. The S100 is truly at another level in so many aspects. The 110HS is extremely impressive for it's low price and has to be one of the best at that price range but if you have the extra money to spend you won't regret moving to the S100(assuming you don't get the dreaded lens error).
1375922
I've ordered the HF100. 549$.I couldn't see any difference between the HG20's 24Mbps recording and the HF100's 17Mbps recording on 40" fullHD Toshiba lcd.It's cheaper about 90$, about 2 16GB SDHC Cards and a 8GB SDHC card...I will use my PS3 to watch videos, no need 60Gb capacity on camcorder.
923771
I went today to look at HDtv's. I saw both the 46XBR4 and the 3000W and another 3000? Sony. All I can say is that by far the XBR4 was crisper and brighter, it looked more like reality. They had ESPN-HD feed on from Direct-TV. Is the difference worth the price, that's something you have to decide. Go look at them, I saw them at CC. I actually spent a good hour in a recliner they had setup and just watched the 46XBR4 comparing it to the sets around it. This is the one I'm getting, it was simply the best picture constantly, even better than models bigger in size with 1080p. It really stood out in the finer details when next to the other sets. I went today to look at HDtv's. I saw both the 46XBR4 and the 3000W and another 3000? Sony. All I can say is that by far the XBR4 was crisper and brighter, it looked more like reality. They had ESPN-HD feed on from Direct-TV. Is the difference worth the price, that's something you have to decide. Go look at them, I saw them at CC. I actually spent a good hour in a recliner they had setup and just watched the 46XBR4 comparing it to the sets around it. This is the one I'm getting, it was simply the best picture constantly, even better than models bigger in size with 1080p. It really stood out... » Read More I went today to look at HDtv's. I saw both the 46XBR4 and the 3000W and another 3000? Sony. All I can say is that by far the XBR4 was crisper and brighter, it looked more like reality. They had ESPN-HD feed on from Direct-TV. Is the difference worth the price, that's something you have to decide. Go look at them, I saw them at CC. I actually spent a good hour in a recliner they had setup and just watched the 46XBR4 comparing it to the sets around it. This is the one I'm getting, it was simply the best picture constantly, even better than models bigger in size with 1080p. It really stood out in the finer details when next to the other sets. « Show Less
972729
From a preview I read on another site (camcorderinfo.com) the highest quality output is true 1920x1080 progressive. Anything captured in a lower quality setting is the 1440x1080 resolution which was troublesome for some editing suites. I am waiting for some more professional reviews to be published comparing this one (and it's 120GB sibling) against the Canon HF10 which is getting good reviews. The Canon features a maximum 17Mb/s bitrate vs. the HDR-SR11/12's 16Mb/s maximum bitrate. The Canon is also flash memory vs. HDD but I don't have a strong preference either way.
2199801
Hey Josh, The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely whatever you use to edit/burn your video will encode the video upon output. So a bit more versatile but also a bit bulkier camera. Bryan
2139061
The card has high-speed, Class 10 performance, which means that you can produce pretty fast file transfer from the card to your computer (assuming you have a card reader to match the speed of the card). It also means that it will do well with producing 1080p full-HD video. But, you want to use it in a camera that costs less than $300. Sure, the camera will capture 1080p full-HD video. Normally, I would say, why would you use such an expensive card for this type of camera? But, if Amazon is offering it for only $25.59, I say go for it. Lexar makes very reliable cards. I have been using them ever since I started with digital cameras; most recently in my 36mp Nikon D800. The card has high-speed, Class 10 performance, which means that you can produce pretty fast file transfer from the card to your computer (assuming you have a card reader to match the speed of the card). It also means that it will do well with producing 1080p full-HD video. But, you want to use it in a camera that costs less than $300. Sure, the camera will capture 1080p full-HD video. Normally, I would say, why would you use such an expensive card for this type of camera? But, if Amazon is offering it for only $25.59, I say go for it. Lexar makes very reliable cards. I have been using them... » Read More The card has high-speed, Class 10 performance, which means that you can produce pretty fast file transfer from the card to your computer (assuming you have a card reader to match the speed of the card). It also means that it will do well with producing 1080p full-HD video. But, you want to use it in a camera that costs less than $300. Sure, the camera will capture 1080p full-HD video. Normally, I would say, why would you use such an expensive card for this type of camera? But, if Amazon is offering it for only $25.59, I say go for it. Lexar makes very reliable cards. I have been using them ever since I started with digital cameras; most recently in my 36mp Nikon D800. « Show Less
1511413
1080 is better than 720 in terms of video quality, the larger number means better quality. This system isn't HD. The maximum resolution is 640x480, which is considerably below hd. The camera is good enough to see what is going on, and you can recognize someone close to the camera, but faces further away would be hard to recognize.