is this paper or for pictures or regular ink jets
1575561
We use it for regular printing on our Epson ink jet printer. It looks much better for text then copy paper or many other paper. Webpages with photos or graphics look good on it too. I use photo paper for pictures.
1575562
I would get a glossier high grade paper for pictures ....this is "good" ...but not BEST, imo ...
1618986
I use an Epson jet printer with factory ink. I have had very good long lasting results with this paper/printer combo.
1721059
Yes and no. It is the only paper I use for everyday use. It has Colorlok, which makes it usable for photos, but it is not photo paper. Though I do use it for photos and they are usable prints, for general use. Example, pic of a neighbors yard, to show to your Association Board and not waste, Premium Photo Paper. You are not going to have a high gloss photo, as you would with HP Premium Photo Paper, High Gloss.
1930071
Be sure that you are using "inkjet" photo paper. Not all photo paper is for use in inkjet printers. Yes, the new inkjet printers are more accurate and tend to use less ink. If you do a lot of photo prints, you may want to purchase a dedicated inkjet printer just for your photos. Those always work better than a combination photo/copy/scan printer.
1106603
I cant help you, my printer is a inkjet . However its great paper for the price I'm very happy with it . Good luck sorry I could not help .Happy New Year
1448772
Yes you can use regular 4 by 6 photo paper with,the epson picturemate printer
2072205
These are not ink jets. They are one time recordable dvd discs. They come 100 discs per stack. They are for recording data not ink for a printer.
89679
You could, being as it's ink. But I would strongly recommend returning it if its not open and buying the regular stuff, being as the inkjet shrinky dinks are twice the price than the regular ones.
243421
I only use this ink for business paperwork which works great - unsure of photo quality
191681
Does not really Matter, I use HP photo glossy and Kodak Glossy photo paper in the letter size to print large pictures and it does ok. Just make sure your printer settings are set to photo glossy. Hope this helps. thanks Linda
143242
It works on injet that doesn't have pictures, just text. It smears on my inkjet when I do any type pict. but clear for text.
24908
In general, ink jet or commercial printing may be best for heavy card stock. My experience with color laser printers of the home office variety is that they are very picky about maximum paper thickness and the max paper thickness they allow is not very thick. Even envelopes have caused me problems with home office variety color laser machines and even the commercial grade color laser for the printing company that did work for me allowed only moderate thickness of paper.
1949388
This is just regular inkjet/copier printer paper. Of Medium quality I might add.It will do the job for regular printing and if you have special needs or uses, you should look for specific paper for your end use.This is just run of the mill inkjet printer paper.
2722
The Office Jet is not a photo printer like a Photo Jet. It does not have a separate photo black ink cartridge. However, I have printed some photos with it, and I was very satisfied with the results. If you want mainly a photo printer, buy a Photo Jet. If you want an excellent quality standard color printer and will occasionally print photos, I highly recommend this printer.
1354154
Regular 8.5x11 printer paper or if printing photos use photo paper for inkjet printers. It will print on 4x6in or larger photo paper.
868530
absolutely not. The back side of the paper has Canon printed at random on it, the other side is the printing/picture side. Make sure to place the paper in your printer the correct way. My printer instructs the picture side to face down. Make sure what your instructions have you to do. This paper is the best ever !! The pictures are clear, crisp and the ink/color/tint of the whole picture is as professional as you can get. I do have a Canon printer and use only Canon ink. it is worth the little extra $ for the life of your pictures.
2278171
i only used it on inkjet. but the ink spread out on the paper. the pictures i printed looked like big pixelated photos. It was almost like the ink bled a bit. It was all blotchy looking like mosaic tiles. The paper was also very thin and i wouldn't call it cover stock at all. it was almost thinner than regular kodak photos.