PX100 vs. "Super-Aural" PX 100W Hello, before I buy a PX for the holidays I'd just like to confirm that the ONLY difference between the PX100 and the PX100W is the colour. Does "Super-Aural" mean anything different? Also since the PX100Ws are now discontinued are they at all behind in technology compared to the black PX100?Thank you,Josh PX100 vs. "Super-Aural" PX 100W Hello, before I buy a PX for the holidays I'd just like to confirm that the ONLY difference between the PX100 and the PX100W is the colour. Does... » Read More PX100 vs. "Super-Aural" PX 100W Hello, before I buy a PX for the holidays I'd just like to confirm that the ONLY difference between the PX100 and the PX100W is the colour. Does "Super-Aural" mean anything different? Also since the PX100Ws are now discontinued are they at all behind in technology compared to the black PX100?Thank you,Josh « Show Less
1585557
The description is strange by Sennheiser to say the least . I'm sure they are the same .
1585558
Thank you very much for your help!I found the same headphones at the apple store online (for a lot more then here!). They show the PX 100 in two colors (white and black---no mention of a "W") and the picture they show of the white one is the same as here. It is very strange how different the descriptions are, but I'm going to have to agree with you that they are basically the same.Thanks again for your help, JoshEDIT: The Sennheiser site has the same discription for both products: http://www.sennheiserusa.com/newsite/productdetail.asp?transid=005206 Thank you very much for your help!I found the same headphones at the apple store online (for a lot more then here!). They show the PX 100 in two colors (white and black---no mention of a "W") and the picture they show of the white one is the same as here. It is very strange how different the descriptions are, but I'm going to have to agree with you that they are basically the same.Thanks again for your help, JoshEDIT: The Sennheiser site has the same discription for both products:... » Read More Thank you very much for your help!I found the same headphones at the apple store online (for a lot more then here!). They show the PX 100 in two colors (white and black---no mention of a "W") and the picture they show of the white one is the same as here. It is very strange how different the descriptions are, but I'm going to have to agree with you that they are basically the same.Thanks again for your help, JoshEDIT: The Sennheiser site has the same discription for both products: http://www.sennheiserusa.com/newsite/productdetail.asp?transid=005206 « Show Less
1585559
and the word mini with the white ones is also weird or makes it seem like they're different somehow.
1585560
In this context, "supra-aural" means that the headphones lay _on_ your ear--as opposed to cupping around your ear or going in your ear (like earbuds). That makes them the same style as the PX100 model. The W likely means white. Best guess? They differ only by color.That said, the two product descriptions are not much help. One includes dimensions and one does not. One has audio specs and one does not. They weigh the same (one says 60 grams and one says 2.3 ounces--it's like someone intentionally tried to make a comparison as confusing as possible).
1585561
This may not help, but I bought the white PX 100's on Amazon about 2 years ago. Mine seem to be exactly the same as these black ones -- and they sound very good :)
1369104
More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal. More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't... » Read More More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal. « Show Less
1804919
The PX-150 has fewer sounds than the 330 and it can not save user settings such as layerd sounds (often I layer a Pad sound or String sound under the Piano sound). There is no LCD on the 150, and really no need for it. The sounds between the two are virtually the same and the action is the same, with the 330 stacked with more sound choices.
703761
Well Claire, speaking from an Audio Engineer's persepective. The only way you can compare is have them right next to each other. Or have a freakishly good sense of hearing and remembering. I bought these subs 4 years ago and they are still stronger then ever. It's all about your applications. The X's deliver a great amount of power while still retaining the quality of the track you are playing. It's about your Box, amp, crossover points, wiring, amperage. But as far as comparing, everyone has told me that I have the cleanest and loudest system they have heard.If you have any more questions! Ask away! I love answering questions like this! Well Claire, speaking from an Audio Engineer's persepective. The only way you can compare is have them right next to each other. Or have a freakishly good sense of hearing and remembering. I bought these subs 4 years ago and they are still stronger then ever. It's all about your applications. The X's deliver a great amount of power while still retaining the quality of the track you are playing. It's about your Box, amp, crossover points, wiring, amperage. But as far as comparing, everyone has told me that I have the cleanest and loudest system they have heard.If you... » Read More Well Claire, speaking from an Audio Engineer's persepective. The only way you can compare is have them right next to each other. Or have a freakishly good sense of hearing and remembering. I bought these subs 4 years ago and they are still stronger then ever. It's all about your applications. The X's deliver a great amount of power while still retaining the quality of the track you are playing. It's about your Box, amp, crossover points, wiring, amperage. But as far as comparing, everyone has told me that I have the cleanest and loudest system they have heard.If you have any more questions! Ask away! I love answering questions like this! « Show Less
1851849
It looks like the only difference is the colors. The PB0 is blue, and the PK0 is black. :)
577488
I've had them both. They are identical. The PMX70 I had the left ear stopped working after 18 months. Not worth the warranty repair. Bought a replacement PMX80 and the left ear stopped working after 3 months. Grrrr!!! After receiving a replacement pair *both* ears suddenly started to *shock* inside my ears after 6 months of use on multiple devices). So once again I'm calling the company. I work out hard daily and do sweat but that's where I thought the strength of these headphones were.
1667632
DSP version has studio monitor emulation feature for headphone mixing, which is pretty cool. This is the version I have. Apart from that, they are exactly the same. I'd say get DSP. No reason to pay more for less. Looks like this one is sold through Proaudiostar, and the other is direct through amazon. Different sellers would account for different pricing, probably.
1752363
When I sent in my px100 original for RMA at Sennheiser USA (Old Lyme, CT I think), one of the higher reps told me there's no difference except the -II looks better and is supposedly more durable. I sold the PX100-II's right after I recieved them and I miss them alot, as stupid as it sounds. Oh well, I'm using the Grado SR325's now!
658789
I prefer the SP280. I did own the PX350 but returned it for the following reasons: Although the key action was nice; some of the keys were unevenly spaced and the sound of the speakers was not loud enough and not as loud as my other Casio the PX-130. The SP280 has a natural sounding piano sample and excellent speakers. The action is not as good as the PX350 to be honest but it sounds better and more realistic.
476650
Hello- think of the Honda Accord. Every few years, Honda comes out with the "new" Accord however it is only every 6-8 years that the company changes the look. So this year, Yamaha changed the look for the DGX640 to different colors. From blonde & brown to black and white but the electronics are the same I believe with maybe one or two minor changes such as a new voice. Best, Andy's Music
640348
The upa 500 is rated at 80W/channel vs 200 for the XPA which can be a whole world of difference. My previous amp was a NAD 955 @ 100W per channel x 5 and is a fairly highly regarded amp at close to twice the price of the XPA. The additional power in the Emotiva made a huge difference with my PSB Synchrony 1Bs. It's a steal at that price. You'd have to go up significantly expense wise to equal it's performance, maybe to an Outlaw Audio which is a better amp but, again, double the price.
111491
I too have listened to the Beats Pill. It was nice sound, but the Phillips beats the Beats Pill, in my opinion for clarity and dispersement. I know the Phillips has four speakers and twelve watts total. The Beats Pill might have the same wattage. The only complaint, and that is the ONLY complaint I have for the Phillips after years of constant use is the power button, which is very large, begins to fail mechanically and turning it on and off can take a few tries (In fairness, the speaker is mounted behind my head, on my powerchair. I have to reach behind me and push the dead center of the large button directly into the device; this hard for me, so I don't push it straight or from the dead center.) I too have listened to the Beats Pill. It was nice sound, but the Phillips beats the Beats Pill, in my opinion for clarity and dispersement. I know the Phillips has four speakers and twelve watts total. The Beats Pill might have the same wattage. The only complaint, and that is the ONLY complaint I have for the Phillips after years of constant use is the power button, which is very large, begins to fail mechanically and turning it on and off can take a few tries (In fairness, the speaker is mounted behind my head, on my powerchair. I have to reach behind me and push the dead center of the... » Read More I too have listened to the Beats Pill. It was nice sound, but the Phillips beats the Beats Pill, in my opinion for clarity and dispersement. I know the Phillips has four speakers and twelve watts total. The Beats Pill might have the same wattage. The only complaint, and that is the ONLY complaint I have for the Phillips after years of constant use is the power button, which is very large, begins to fail mechanically and turning it on and off can take a few tries (In fairness, the speaker is mounted behind my head, on my powerchair. I have to reach behind me and push the dead center of the large button directly into the device; this hard for me, so I don't push it straight or from the dead center.) « Show Less
309730
My granddaughter ask for the pill for Christmas. I know it has great sound, but I can not compare the two as I have not hear the srx5. I was greatly surprised at the sound that came out of the pill.
2194638
after reading the ansewr, i'm still can't understand what is the real difrent between the philips 1090 and 1090x and 1090xd.if u can plz help me to select one of them. and i found the jet cleaner is good option but it does't come with any one of them.so should i select from the old modle 1060 becouse it has jet cleaner or i have to buy the latest as 1090.i have sensetive skin, and i would like to shave every day. which on can help me.my e-mail addres btraifi@hotmail.combest regardsbader
1503517
That significantly had an effect on the sound quality. The X-230 sounds a lot better in comparison. I get a more surround sound feel with the X-230, but I can't say the same about the X-240's. Easily X-230 > X-240.
1804920
I don't know as I've never played a px-150, sorry. But it seems that the 150 is a later generation and the 330 has more tones. I am quite happy with the 330 still, and play it almost every day, however, I only use the piano tones, so I could have saved money by just getting the 130.
1069329
I've worn both of these actually. And I've found the M50X's to be amazingly good for the price. They're extremely comfortable, and they're a good choice overall. Nonetheless, the P5's get the edge. The sound is neutral on both of them, but the P5's sound is a bit more nuanced, and true to the source material. (And if you're looking for something with thumping bass, neither of these are your friend - I'd look at beats for that). The P5's are also much more "luxurious". The padding, the presentation, and the details - everything is a step up, albeit at a heftier price tag. I would definitely recommend trying both out at a store if you can - it's a close one. I've worn both of these actually. And I've found the M50X's to be amazingly good for the price. They're extremely comfortable, and they're a good choice overall. Nonetheless, the P5's get the edge. The sound is neutral on both of them, but the P5's sound is a bit more nuanced, and true to the source material. (And if you're looking for something with thumping bass, neither of these are your friend - I'd look at beats for that). The P5's are also much more "luxurious". The padding, the presentation, and the details - everything is a step up, albeit at a heftier price tag. I would... » Read More I've worn both of these actually. And I've found the M50X's to be amazingly good for the price. They're extremely comfortable, and they're a good choice overall. Nonetheless, the P5's get the edge. The sound is neutral on both of them, but the P5's sound is a bit more nuanced, and true to the source material. (And if you're looking for something with thumping bass, neither of these are your friend - I'd look at beats for that). The P5's are also much more "luxurious". The padding, the presentation, and the details - everything is a step up, albeit at a heftier price tag. I would definitely recommend trying both out at a store if you can - it's a close one. « Show Less