Huge lack of specifications like: length. weight, parallax, eye relief, images of P4 etc?
1599008
You get what you pay for.... Anything past 5 power is compleatly blurry. I use it with my cheep hi-point 9 mm carbine. Over all I'm happy with it.
553148
Found the detailed manual converted to a pdf on another site and it is downloadable and searchable and can be printed - all 200+ pages.http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/colton/Sony%20RX100%20User%20Guide.pdf
397290
5" from eyepiece to lens. 5-1/4" side -to-side fully extended. Not sure on the weight, but they are comforatable to hold for an extended time. Good visuals and easy to use. We are thinking of buying another pair as these are the ones everyone fights over. Highly recommend.
965887
Hello, i need to know how width, height and lenght for courrier quotation. Thks
484799
The cheapest that I found the PX model for was around $2100 but I was able to find the PK for around $1400. To me it wasn't worth the extra $700+ 3D glasses in order to view the 3D content.
524218
Go to the manufacturer website, find the product and there will more than likely be a PDF with all the specs and dimensions.
1160890
According to an online binocular review site, the IPD range for this model is 57mm-75mm.
1919601
Id recommend 150 dpi you can get hi res photo's off the web however most photos on the web are 72 dpi and would look poor.
923249
This probably is not helpful: I'm delighted with the 45-175mm, but I got it for a steal as an Amazon lightning deal for just under $200. Buying was a no-brainer. So the only real advice I can offer is to be extremely patient and keep your eyes open for a great deal on the 45-175mm.
1581397
Dear JyulrichMaybe you could find the detail specifications on Internet ( including Amazon.com ) as I don't know what you ask correctly - Sorry about that as I'm an old manBut the weight is very light and the performance is super also very thin to carry around.It's been a year only but I'm personally totally satisfied with this in every ways.Cool Computer !!!
1934108
I downloaded the user manual from the manufacturer's web site. Here are the camera specs: Camera Specifications Memory: Accepts MicroSD card Size: 40mm 20mm 8mm LWH Codec Video: 1280720, 30 fps, file extension .avi Codec Audio: PCM S16 LE, mono Still Image capture: 1280720, 96 dpi, file extension .jpg
211725
2-1/4 tall and 3-3/4 long by 1" thick (counted folded-in lens). Shouldn't this info be on the specs for this camera on the Amazon page?
1273541
I accont provide you with a catalogue number but you need a heavy dutty one. The lens is heavy and you need a stable platform to get clear pictures. Took some Moon shot using a borrowed tripod as my basic one was not useful
1486174
It's about this size: http://www.torpac.com/images/torpac4.gif (on a 1024x768 screen, 72dpi) if your looking for actual size viewing
515025
I copied the specs right from the prod. desc. on Amazon. There are too many to write. Just go to the page and see the info.
723600
Dear 'Saiko,' I'm afraid I'm not sure what you mean. I do not have a web site. However, if you are referring to my review of the PT-AE4000U, then I hope it was of some help to you. It is very wordy and I apologize for that but, on the other hand, this is a very complex piece of electronics and it does take a fairly long time to learn. I tried to convey that. (Though it can be used fully satisfactorily right out of the box, most people will want to learn to 'tweak' its settings, something which is very rewarding.) After over a year, I am still completely satisfied with my projector and I stand behind everything I said in the review. So far it seems that no one has come out with a projector comparable to the PT-AE4000U in terms of performance, price, power adjustments for focus, etc., and the options for users to adjust the picture/lens settings, including the ones which are normally hidden. Even Panasonic has not introduced a "new, improved" model as this one is, in my opinion (and evidently theirs too), a superb video projector and is unlikely to be matched, much less improved, anywhere near its price by another one any time soon. Thank you for writing (even if the meaning of what you wrote is obscure, at least to me). Lawrence
2258744
I recall a specification saying that the camera was 5 megapixels. Rather low, I'm not super happy with it.