ANSI rating for Radians Revelation Protective Shooting Glasses: Does anyone know if the ANSI rating is actually on the glasses themselves?
245430
I found this added to the description on web sites of several other sellers: All of Radians glasses are produced in ISO Certified facilities. They meet or exceed ANSI Z87.1 + standards and many styles have also been evaluated to Canadian safety standards
1944808
I have not found any issues with these Glasses. The pictures are digital quality. I am truley amazed that they only cost $35.00. My Brotherinlaw has purchased ( 2 ) pair and Loves them.
131169
Apparently there are several answers to this one. My guess is that some of these sights work good and are parallax free. Others, on the other hand, are not. Given that it's cheap, this doesn't surprise me. Anyhow, the one I purchased is definitely NOT parallax free. The dot moves when I change the position of my head. Of course, it would be nice if they just put this little note in the product description.
560475
I have ordered these glasses and tested it with 2 different UV spectrums. I have found it blocked 395nm but not so much for 365nm To 370nm wavelengths. I tested this by holding the UV light(s) then putting the glasses in front of transitional lenses on glasses.
1543547
The serial number is on the bottom/back of the scope opposite the angled eyepiece. You should usually find it near the tripod mount bracket. I say "usually" because the tripod bracket can be rotated. In any case it's always 180 degrees opposite of the eyepiece. I'm explaining with far too much detail, because you really can't miss it - just turn the thing over and there it is :) It says "China" followed by the serial number.
1098705
I also see an oblong dot, almost a set of dots that seem not round. I was diagnosed a few years back with a "mild astigmatism", and although I do have glasses, I generally do not wear them. I was unsure if it was the astigmatism or a faulty unit, so spoke with Trijicon on the phone and they said to exchange the unit with a new one. I did so through Amazon and found that the new unit did the exact same thing. I believe that its the astigmatism, and although mine is so mild that I don't have the need to wear glasses, it still makes the laser dot seem oblong.
670399
Let me see if I can give you a definitive answer. In any day light condition these are very clear and bright. It is currently 7:45PM and dark outside. Even after walking outside with no time to adjust to the dark I can clearly see the color dots well enough to align them. One last point. I bought these to replace a laser sight that crapped out on me and I am glad I did. With these there is nothing likely to wear out and no batteries to replace.
1213448
+3.5. And, besides: I tried them in a store and found that they they work superbly for adjusting on the fly between -6 and +3.5 correction (more or less). The optics seem excellent. As a fashion statement a bit awkward but hard to make the double lens system look better. The dial adjusters are discretely positioned and effective. I have no idea about durability.
818381
Thank you for the inquiry, perhaps Radians Coveralls Shooting Glass would be what you need. Radians Coveralls are traditional style glasses designed to be worn over prescription glasses.
58070
They are like those given at a 3D movie. I guess that would be polarized glasses, they are not shutter glasses. They are made for the current models of LG television 3D.
369053
As far as I can tell it is glued in place to the adjustment block inside the sight. Its not glass but i believe its acrylic which actually has superior light transmission than glass. Your typical glass is only about 70% effecient where as acrylic can be up to 90% The sight body is anodized aluminum.
1945226
I haven't tested them, but the ad calls them 'safety' glasses. They're great sunglasses and motorcycle goggles, especially when you're out driving around sunset with the setting sun in your eyes. But I wouldn't try viewing an eclipse or striking an arc with them as my only protection. I seem to remember they have an ANSI rating but there are several different ANSI standards, so it's important to know which one they meet. As in anything involving your sight, caution is best.
351004
Mine were. They are excellent. Perfect for the professional who needs great day & night sights.
557873
Not sure whether this applies to this pair or not, but one of their other models (the GR004-C1) says this in the product description: "For those who wear drugstore readers and intend to use our glasses for computer use, we recommend you order 50% the power of your reading glasses. So if you're reading power is that of +2.00, order your Gamma Ray Readers in +1.00. If your reading power is +2.25, round down and order your Gamma Ray Readers in +1.00."
1961445
The description states that hey are ANSI Z87.1-2003 High Impact (marked "Z87.1+" on the lens) rated. That rating means the lens has to survive - without fracturing, penetration, or fragmentation - being shot with a .250" ball bearing from 4 ft. away at a speed of 150 f/s for safety glasses and 250 f/s for goggles. This is the same rating class we use in our machine shop and when shooting real firearms - so I'd say you should be pretty safe using them for paintball or airsoft as far as IMPACT resistance.
141176
Sorry I was confused with something else. These safety glasses work fine for me.
1401102
I've worn these at burning man. They block dust well and look pretty cool. They are also very dark, which is helpful for the intense sun during the day. However, I am not sure if they are uv rated (I think maybe not) so I often wear uv rated sunglasses instead. Can someone please confirm the uv rating of these?