What is the difference between the 561BHDV-1 and the MVM500A apart from the weight limit, more so with the 500 vs 701 series head?
1577991
The only difference in the 2 heads is that the 701 is more of a traditional sliding plate design. The 500 has a new "drop-in" design that is supposedly faster. The feet and monopod part of each model are the same. I have the 701 because the 500 wan't released yet and I love it. My entire setup revolves around the sliding plates.
1577992
It seems as if the 500A does have a dampen horizontal panning ability and a threaded port for accessories, the 561 does not, The 561 does have auto center, spring loaded vertical ability. I have the 561 BHDV and the lack of horizontal dampening in the head is not a problem since it is dampened at the bottom of the monopod. It appears to be more stable horizontally since you would hold the shaft with one hand and the lever with the other. However I tried to use the 561 head on a tripod and could not since it has no panning ability. I am very happy with the 561BHDV monopod. Hope this help. Mike.
1577993
The 561 has a video head with handle which works very well to shoot video with your Dslr camera or with a regular video camera. It also gives you 6 feet 5 inches in height which is very helpful in shooting over crowds. Wirh the sliding quick release plate it is fast to assemble.
422950
I have them both. These sound better but don't clamp as hard or fit my head as well. The decreased clamping makes them more comfortable but they leak more sound out and don't isolate as well from outside sounds. I kind of like the 280's for drowning outside noises.
395087
The 120 is their "Matrix" drill version of interchangeable heads for one motor body. It has substantially less torque than the 220
867253
The cheaper model is an older version that doesn't allow you to un-screw the top post and then attach the head directly to the legs for extra stability. Take a look at the photos on the T-005KX and it shows this setup. You can't do that with the old model. There may be other minor differences, but that's the major one.
1307114
This product doesn't have a fluid head. The Manfrotto MVM500A monopod with 500 head, to my knowledge, doesn't include a fully functioning 500 head, but rather one modified for the monopod, which removes the panning function of the head since the monopod's fluid base provides this function. I purchased the 500AH head separately from the 562B-1, and use the QR receiver on my shoulder rig. Using the fully functioning 500AH head, I can choose to add a 75mm ball base attachment, or leave it flat for use on other tripod legs, sliders, etc. Much more useful than a botched version of the head.
1847870
M-770 crankarms are hollow, and the chainrings are machined more precisely and made out of more durable material than M-590 (which has solid crankarms). There is a weight penalty with the M-590, due to the crankarms being solid, but there is little difference in shifting, while the crankset is relatively new. Durability of the rings will somewhat lower, if you don't keep the drivetrain clean. While there may be some difference in the quality of bearings, between the XT and Deore levels, i have never been able to discern it.
2027099
I would say anything from 100 watts to 600 watts. I have run mine with a Gallien Kruger 700RB and also a Hartke 350. They can handle a high powered head, but I would recommend you start out at very low volume and not to blow them out. With my GK, I am now running a Seimic 4x10, and in a club setting, rarely have I had it over a 2 on the master volume. Tone is killer. Have also used my 2x10 with a 15" in another cab and sounded great that way too. One advantage to having a pair of 2x10's is the weight and ease of moving it. My 4x10 is heavy in comparison, but they sound pretty much the same. What amp head are you considering? I would say anything from 100 watts to 600 watts. I have run mine with a Gallien Kruger 700RB and also a Hartke 350. They can handle a high powered head, but I would recommend you start out at very low volume and not to blow them out. With my GK, I am now running a Seimic 4x10, and in a club setting, rarely have I had it over a 2 on the master volume. Tone is killer. Have also used my 2x10 with a 15" in another cab and sounded great that way too. One advantage to having a pair of 2x10's is the weight and ease of moving it. My 4x10 is heavy in comparison, but they sound pretty much the... » Read More I would say anything from 100 watts to 600 watts. I have run mine with a Gallien Kruger 700RB and also a Hartke 350. They can handle a high powered head, but I would recommend you start out at very low volume and not to blow them out. With my GK, I am now running a Seimic 4x10, and in a club setting, rarely have I had it over a 2 on the master volume. Tone is killer. Have also used my 2x10 with a 15" in another cab and sounded great that way too. One advantage to having a pair of 2x10's is the weight and ease of moving it. My 4x10 is heavy in comparison, but they sound pretty much the same. What amp head are you considering? « Show Less
2135171
Nv83a is a older modle it is on the heavy side but does great, The nv90a is better balanced and lighter the only complaint I have after about 3 months off using it is the driver pin came loose from the piston
1686445
The original 1677M weighs 13.5 lbs. "M" stands for magnesium: I believe this is the first saw to make extensive use of M to lighten the load. Newer worm drives may be lighter. All sidewinders are lighter..I use both my Bosch 1677M and an old DeWalt sidewinder. The Bosch is the workhorse. If I'm working over-head or on the roof, or I need a right-hand blade, I go for the lighter DeWalt.
1162625
The HX8012/30 is the unit its self and the Hx8012/64 are the replacement heads for the unit. I hope that helps.
1901388
Thanks Grandmother Philip:-). I also wanted to know the difference between 460 & 560. Too bad there's not a place on the internet wherein you could type the different makes/models for comparison purposes.
245885
I'm not convinced the specs are not identical. Although i haven't found separate charts to prove that. It really sounds like marketing numbers 17HP @ 4944 and 15.01HP at 4500RPM might be identical at both products if you find a curve for both products.
96009
I bought it with only one head, the 8.5 mm. I didn't need the smaller diameter, 5.5mm. According to Autel, either 5.5 or 8.5 mm imager heads are supported by the same display body. On Amazon, I saw an 8.5 mm head for sale separately, but they aren't cheap - I think it was $75. I think the 5.5mm head costs a bit more, so if you really need its smaller diameter, definitely buy that one to start with. Once you have the 5.5mm head, you may never have a need for the 8.5mm head. Regarding length, I haven't seen anything for the Autel MV208 other than the 1 meter. If it's important to have greater lengths, definitely contact Autel to find out if they are available. It looks pretty much impossible to modify or adapt an imaging head, so find out before you buy.
1279709
The 575 allows you to control the amount of head on your beer. The 525 does not allow for that. I have the 525 and could not be happier. I almost never pour a beer with head anymore
1769358
Same quality. The 506 has standard dual head set on an angle and the 516 has a dual head with a straight end for filling inside dual tires through the outside wheel. The 516 has threads in the bore that simply grip the threads of the valve stem; slightly larger diameter than the stem so it slips on when straight, but hangs when off-straight. The 506 does not have the thread lock feature.
107301
We bought the 701HDV model head for this Tripod. It seems to work fine. It is a little choppy, so if you want a fluid head, you may want to look at something else.
2233688
I have a manfrotto with 502ah head and I add anorher 5lbs weight to balance my Canon 5Dmk3. No problem.