Would this be a good lens for photographing the Milky Way on Olympus OM-D
1601433
I really don't know. A faster wide angle lens may be better for that use. It has all of the distortion of a real fisheye, so your images would have that issue. If you're shooting artistically, no problem, but for scientific use, it may well have too much fisheye distortion. It's not particularly fast so you'd have the issue of star trails unless you shot at a high ISO (which you could with your OM-D). It's a good fisheye lens, not a toy, but I'd hate to recommend it for scientific purposes. Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
1601434
If you are looking for a whole sky view, it is an excellent fish eye lens for doing that. I have found it easier to use manual lenses than AF at night.It is a good inexpensive fish eye lens. Have fun.
1601435
Not sure - think it could be too wide.Have you tried with the 12mm? or what other lens - is it not wide enough?
1601436
You've probably made your buying decision by now, but I've personally found that you need a far narrower aperture to get a decent space shot even with a 60" exposure on a 4/3 sensor.
1601437
Perhaps, with a long exposure using a tripod in a very dark sky. A F3.5 is not the biggest light grabbing lens, but it would be worth a try. This is one of those lenses that I am not afraid to attempt all sorts of shots. Overall, a very good reasonably priced lens.
169817
Yes, but you'll need one of the many OM-to-micro4:3 adapters. Olympus' version is expensive, but there are many inexpensive third-party adapters. Make sure whichever one you get focuses properly at infinity (and at minimum focus distance).
466912
Definitely. I bought this lens with that in mind and is very pleased. It takes wonderful pictures with low light and gives you good control over the focus of the image.
1414086
I have used mine for astrophotography but it is on the slow end if what is possible. For occasional use it is fine, but if this will be its main use you may well get frustrated. How well does your camera handle noise at high ISO? I don't think 1/3 stop should make enough difference for you to change your mind if this is the lens you prefer. It is very light and the IQ on full frame is fantastic. I have since bought a 24 - 70 f2.8 and despite the longer focal length I use this at night for the extra speed. So for dedicated astrophotography lens consider something faster. For occasional use it will do the job. I have used mine for astrophotography but it is on the slow end if what is possible. For occasional use it is fine, but if this will be its main use you may well get frustrated. How well does your camera handle noise at high ISO? I don't think 1/3 stop should make enough difference for you to change your mind if this is the lens you prefer. It is very light and the IQ on full frame is fantastic. I have since bought a 24 - 70 f2.8 and despite the longer focal length I use this at night for the extra speed. So for dedicated astrophotography lens consider something faster. For occasional use... » Read More I have used mine for astrophotography but it is on the slow end if what is possible. For occasional use it is fine, but if this will be its main use you may well get frustrated. How well does your camera handle noise at high ISO? I don't think 1/3 stop should make enough difference for you to change your mind if this is the lens you prefer. It is very light and the IQ on full frame is fantastic. I have since bought a 24 - 70 f2.8 and despite the longer focal length I use this at night for the extra speed. So for dedicated astrophotography lens consider something faster. For occasional use it will do the job. « Show Less
1929220
That's exactly the camera I'm using it on! It works great. I love this lens. I use it regularly to get amazing shots of the moon. It's a serious, sophisticated, dependable lens. JF
1429330
I think it would work great for that. The optics are amazing...I took it on a safari and got some amazing photos. The only concern I could potentially see you having is the stop if you are shooting indoors. They make one that opens up further, however it is nearly double the price. I don't typically shoot low light, so I can't give you any advice here. I found it to be a pretty incredible lens.
1943774
Yes, definitively. But not with the standard lenses. The Sirius Plossi 10mm are good enough for interesting lunar views. Planets are still too small to really enjoy. But I bought 2x, 3x and 5x Barlow lenses and that is really good. A 3x Barlow with 10mm Plossi means 180x power. Nice views of Jupiter (Red Storm quite visible, atmosphere details as well) and Saturn (clearly defined rings). 5x Barlow with 10mm Plossi means 300x power. Good enough views (hard to focus without a 2-speed focuser, much more chromatic aberration). Furthermore, if at 180x it is already difficult to keep plante on view field (due to earth rotation movement), at 300x is almost impossible (unless you keep your eye on and keep adjusting position manually). For planets, a motorized mounting is mandatory. Also, at such high power, a usb camera plugged to a notebook would provide a much more effective way to see images (at notebook screen, obviously, not so "enjoyable" as a direct sight at ocular lens). I just bought a USB camera, as well as two astrophotography cameras, but have not yet opportunity to test. So, all in all: 1) for pleasant planetary views, with low cost, this Orion 120ST + 3x Barlow is really good 2) for formidable planetary views, consider upgrade either to a 100-to-120 APO Refractor or to a 160mm Reflector, with motorized mounting and good cams.
900105
I am using it one a 5D MIII and am quite happy with the lens. I got it for time-lapse with the manual aperture feature. So far very happy with the lens for the price.
354492
I personally love this lens. But then, I am not trying to photograph bugs with it. My photos are perfect and have caught some great photos of hummingbirds I was shooting recently. I have a Canon T3. It does Macro.
1069238
I can't speak to that, but I'm fairly finicky about the glass I use (I mostly shoot olympus m4/3 primes), and I really like this 75-300 lens. With good light, you can get some stunning images of wildlife, landscapes, and the moon! I've even used it indoors (with the olympus 600r) and gotten some fantastic shots as well. Olympus used nice glass in this lens. While it's not going to be on my camera every day, it's great for specific applications.
416862
The primary reason I bought this lens was for aurora and wide field star shooting. Results are amazing. And yes, it focuses to infinity..I usually pull back small titch from infinity for sharp stars but most of the time, it's not really necessary.
905049
I think so. I once owned this lens and D7000 and got fine images as a macro lens.
352398
Absolutely!! It's an amazing lens.. The aperture is great to control the amount of light the lens allows in to get those amazing pictures.
1252559
Probably not. It's a great lens but I think it would work better on a professional camera.
747378
For landscape it's amazing. I have not tried it yet for astrophotography. I did take some amazing sunsets with it but have not tried it with stars. For that i'm thinking of buying the Rokinon 24mm f1.4. That lens is a fixed lens but that's what you will need for shooting the stars. This is an amazing carry in your bag lens though. It takes incredible sharp photos! I love it! I will try to go out tonight and see about the stars but I think with the 3.5 aperture I probably won't get great images. I would buy this again.
766702
I am presently using this lens for astrophotography and I am very pleased with its results.
463482
I see it more as a normal lens. Does really well in general shooting with Olympus pen. Worth every penny.