I have an Ampeg GVT52 that came stock with JJs. Love the JJs for their smooth tone, but would like to try something else, will these make much diff?
1606405
Each amp takes tubes so differently so it's hard to say. I can only speak for my 2013 vox ac30 and they did make a nice difference. Subtle but different. It's kinda like different brands of strings. All similar but slight variations. I ended up recording with my phone to help hear the difference side by side. Overall I'm glad I tried them and I did keep them in. Hope this helps.
1606406
Yes the Tungsol is a good tube that what I am using, I also like like the Svetlana 12AX7 Nice tube or Electro Harmonix tubes not bad either ... Power tubes SED Wing C or Svetlana with the Tungsol or the Svetlana 12AX7.. Mullards are OK
1606407
Well, I'm not THE specialist but considering my short experience with this tubes I would say it won't make any audible diference, but they have a good price tho. Most people that don't have a measuring equipment buy lots of these inexpensive tubes and just go trying them on. But I would consider buy a NOS tube or at least those ones with the golden terminals. As I said, if you are a audiophile and have equipments to mesure distortions and noise at low/hi levels you'll see diference. And try to buy the balanced ones to use as a set. Go for the New Old Stock.
2026634
I use EJ17 strings normally and tried the EXP17. I never felt the EXP17 to be as bright as the EJ17 are when they are new. The EJ17seem to decline in their brightness more quickly than the EXP17 which eventually seem brighter. I play about an hour or so a day andI kept the EXP17s for 6 weeks and change the EJ17s after 3-4 weeks. I like the almost-harpsicord brightness of new EJ17 and decidedto just buy them more often. I gave a set of EXP17s to two buddies - I think they had similar opinions and are back to EJ17s. Onthe other hand, for a bright guitar or using light gauge strings, perhaps the EXP variety would be just right.more often. I use EJ17 strings normally and tried the EXP17. I never felt the EXP17 to be as bright as the EJ17 are when they are new. The EJ17seem to decline in their brightness more quickly than the EXP17 which eventually seem brighter. I play about an hour or so a day andI kept the EXP17s for 6 weeks and change the EJ17s after 3-4 weeks. I like the almost-harpsicord brightness of new EJ17 and decidedto just buy them more often. I gave a set of EXP17s to two buddies - I think they had similar opinions and are back to EJ17s. Onthe other hand, for a bright guitar or using light... » Read More I use EJ17 strings normally and tried the EXP17. I never felt the EXP17 to be as bright as the EJ17 are when they are new. The EJ17seem to decline in their brightness more quickly than the EXP17 which eventually seem brighter. I play about an hour or so a day andI kept the EXP17s for 6 weeks and change the EJ17s after 3-4 weeks. I like the almost-harpsicord brightness of new EJ17 and decidedto just buy them more often. I gave a set of EXP17s to two buddies - I think they had similar opinions and are back to EJ17s. Onthe other hand, for a bright guitar or using light gauge strings, perhaps the EXP variety would be just right.more often. « Show Less
1898505
There is a newer version of the Valhalla amp with which you can 'tube roll', but apparently not with the original. Check-out the Shiit website.
303293
after hand surgery i changed my washburn acoustic to nylon (most washburns have high enough action -wouldn't try it on an ovation or ibanez) it was excellent. BUT you must adjust. you'll figure it out. i used to tune in a higher key for less buzz but that is not necessary. gotta tell ya you'll lose volume and briteness & acoustic "clarity" but it is a sweet mellow sound; but i love bottom end.
762317
It is better, but be sure your getting a 231. There is a. 231s that is silver in color . The faders are stout and smooth, and dbx is great. There is a 31 band eq from bbe that I like a lot as well, same price point as the dbx.
1366592
I'm not sure ..i put one on a 00 size guitar ( mahogany/spruce) ..it's a good natural sound using a small Yamaha PAamp and a bit bassy using my Hendrikson jazz amp. On a D28 it probably will be bassier than an undersaddle or amagnetic Fishman rare earth pickup. If you have good EQ facilities you'll get a good loud natural sound assumingit's installed correctly.
1894350
Ive got mine hooked to a pioneer premier 12 in 2ohms and its really really loud I have to keep the subwoofer line way down. Im sure it would be similar for yours in 4ohms its a very strong amp. Works great ive had a few different kenwood amps and they always perform.
878611
it will sound good. louder than one might think. i love the little guy. i've had amps for way more $ and be equal or less than good. the el84 plus the 12x7 yadda yadda is the same as a Vox. A class too. sounds like a beatles amp, but raunchier. problems... the cheap ass plugs electric hook up thingsy is eggshellish. cut corners somehow i guess. if you can afford the speaker cab, i'd go for it. the speaker is voiced for the amp and breaks up when driven at the right time. lovely.
1395762
The VHT Special 6 Combo is better suited to clean guitar tones. Has lots of clean headroom and takes pedals well. I have a cheap tremolo and reverb in front of it. Sounds great. It's way too loud for your living room.
1702005
No.Tone varies by brand. Sometimes even between models within the same brand. If you got a Yamaha NS setup going already I'd stick with it.
1570376
I'm not sure of the specs of that amp but I can tell you the low end absolutely sucks at 20 RMS. Loose, muddy and by my ears sound like cheap paper blowing in the wind. However, I still used them after placing a crossover in line for highs only. Clean tweeter With little ear fatuge. If I may recommend two alternatives...Infinity kappa are a well rounded speaker design and my first choice for balanced sound reproduction. If you like a little more tight bass Pyle has some great two ways. I hope that helps, but your ears are your best guide.
585178
Is it in the same league as a Mesa, Dr. Z, vintage Fender or Marshall? NO. However, it sounds close enough that most commoners would never know the difference. And with a bit of tweeking from pedals, EQ, etc., mine comes close enough that after 30+ years of playing professionally, I am well satisfied with it. Every single experienced picker that has heard mine has commented on the great vintage sound that it puts out. Of course, I have changed every tube in it because the stock tubes were junk.
2026635
I have acoustic Gibson, Martin, Epiphone, Lag, Breedlove and Dean guitars. I only use D'Addario EXP16 strings on them. I really like the tone and they are coated to last longer. The EJ16 strings are not coated.
489322
Go to Fender's website, look up your amp and the suggested foot switch, then cross check the stock number. It is important to note, not all foot switches are interchangeable; best do your research.
1038784
I replaced my Gibson SG Custom tuners with no problem. They tune better and weigh more to give you more sustain. I also added an American made Bigsby to add even more weight. Sounds perfect with the original 490 pickups.
144065
Well, I do not think so. I have checked with my 3 classical instruments (from different makers) and the string spacing are almost the same. The difference is not a major issue, I always played only classical guitar and the feeling when playing with SLG130NW is very similar. I am very happy with this Yamaha guitar. Pls consider a good acoustic amplifier (mine is a Behringer Ultracoustic ACX 450).
2284282
I'm running 2 kenwood excelon subs rated at 300 each. The jx 1000 has more power than they can handle but they sound great. It's better to have to much power than not enough. I think your subs would be a good match up for this amp