Samsung HLT5087SAX vs Samsung HL-T5087S Are these the exact same set? I've been reading some reviews of the HLT5087SAX and many people assume that they are the same(writing things like, "I just love my HL-T5087S). I've compared the specs of the HLT5087SAX (sold here) with those of the pricier HL-T5087S (sold elsewhere) and found them to be identical except for the absence of any mention of the DNIe (Digital Natural Image engine) on the HLT5087SAX. Don't confuse the DNIe with Samsung's Cinema Smooth light engine, which both models proclaim.Don't get me wrong, I want these to be one in the same, but the $600 difference in price has me thinking there must be something missing in the SAX model.Can anyone confirm the presence of the DNIe (Digital Natural Image engine) in the Samsung HLT5087SAX ? Samsung HLT5087SAX vs Samsung HL-T5087S Are these the exact same set? I've been reading some reviews of the HLT5087SAX and many people assume that they are the same(writing things like,... » Read More Samsung HLT5087SAX vs Samsung HL-T5087S Are these the exact same set? I've been reading some reviews of the HLT5087SAX and many people assume that they are the same(writing things like, "I just love my HL-T5087S). I've compared the specs of the HLT5087SAX (sold here) with those of the pricier HL-T5087S (sold elsewhere) and found them to be identical except for the absence of any mention of the DNIe (Digital Natural Image engine) on the HLT5087SAX. Don't confuse the DNIe with Samsung's Cinema Smooth light engine, which both models proclaim.Don't get me wrong, I want these to be one in the same, but the $600 difference in price has me thinking there must be something missing in the SAX model.Can anyone confirm the presence of the DNIe (Digital Natural Image engine) in the Samsung HLT5087SAX ? « Show Less
1581244
THere is a discussion about this on the AVS Forums also. PS I just got my 5687SAX and it is fantastic. I'll post feedback after a few weeks to ensure nothing goes wrong with it. So far sooooooo good.
1581245
The HLT5087SAX has the LED light engine which removes the rainbow effect and also has a 20,000 hour life span. While the older model uses the normal DLP light bulb which has to be replaced every couple of years or so.
1581246
I started to get back on the fence after hearing about the "blue fog" or halo/prism effect on this model. Made in the USA is a clincher and I'll be buying it ASAP.
1581247
I apologize. I misread the first post, I thought you were comparing the 5076 to the 5087.
1581248
I just got off the phone with Samsung. The only difference between the two models is that the 5087SAX model is made in the U.S.
1581249
Yes they both utilize the LED light engine, but the (S) model is certainly not the older model. Either they are the exact same model being sold with different product codes or the (S) is the upper end of the two. Every Samsung I've looked into has the trademark DNIe and I'm hoping the reference has just been omitted in the product description of the (SAX). Either this is just one sweet deal or there is a valid reason why this model is so inexpensive.I've heard that the elimination of the color wheel has removed the 'rainbow effect' but the 'hot spot' is still prevalent. Is this true and how bad is the spot? Yes they both utilize the LED light engine, but the (S) model is certainly not the older model. Either they are the exact same model being sold with different product codes or the (S) is the upper end of the two. Every Samsung I've looked into has the trademark DNIe and I'm hoping the reference has just been omitted in the product description of the (SAX). Either this is just one sweet deal or there is a valid reason why this model is so inexpensive.I've heard that the elimination of the color wheel has removed the 'rainbow effect' but the 'hot spot' is still prevalent. Is this... » Read More Yes they both utilize the LED light engine, but the (S) model is certainly not the older model. Either they are the exact same model being sold with different product codes or the (S) is the upper end of the two. Every Samsung I've looked into has the trademark DNIe and I'm hoping the reference has just been omitted in the product description of the (SAX). Either this is just one sweet deal or there is a valid reason why this model is so inexpensive.I've heard that the elimination of the color wheel has removed the 'rainbow effect' but the 'hot spot' is still prevalent. Is this true and how bad is the spot? « Show Less
1473820
The one Amazon sold me was a Samsung panel going by the code used in the serial number. Samsung for some reason uses more than one manufacturer to build their panels. Perhaps it is to produce less expensive versions of this model for people who live in poorer countries. From what I understand from reading the official HU8550 forum on AVSForum, there are other dealers who are undercutting retailers like Amazon and Best Buy selling the cheaper non-Samsung panel versions, but Amazon was not one of them. This is likely why Amazon does not price match some electronics stores as what they sell is not a direct match in quality to Amazon's products despite using the same model name to describe the TV. The one Amazon sold me was a Samsung panel going by the code used in the serial number. Samsung for some reason uses more than one manufacturer to build their panels. Perhaps it is to produce less expensive versions of this model for people who live in poorer countries. From what I understand from reading the official HU8550 forum on AVSForum, there are other dealers who are undercutting retailers like Amazon and Best Buy selling the cheaper non-Samsung panel versions, but Amazon was not one of them. This is likely why Amazon does not price match some electronics stores as what they sell is... » Read More The one Amazon sold me was a Samsung panel going by the code used in the serial number. Samsung for some reason uses more than one manufacturer to build their panels. Perhaps it is to produce less expensive versions of this model for people who live in poorer countries. From what I understand from reading the official HU8550 forum on AVSForum, there are other dealers who are undercutting retailers like Amazon and Best Buy selling the cheaper non-Samsung panel versions, but Amazon was not one of them. This is likely why Amazon does not price match some electronics stores as what they sell is not a direct match in quality to Amazon's products despite using the same model name to describe the TV. « Show Less
794023
The FH is the newer model. That seems to be the only difference. That could explain the difference in price as the older model is no longer sold directly by Amazon. They are both non-smart TVs with the same resolution, Hz, and refresh rate. I can't find anything different other than release date. I would therefore by the FH as its cheaper and fulfilled by Amazon Prime.
602267
This is the First time EVER I have replied to someone posting on these forums. Usually, I enjoy reading and gaining insight on the topic at hand. But, since I have first hand experience I will share what I think you should do. I believe you should order it online from Amazon.com and not from one of the retailers that you can purchase from through amazon, for instance, Datavision, J&R, or Beach Camera. The price difference from bestbuy and amazon.com (Directly Amazon) is too much to ignore. I just ordered the Samsung Lnt4065f for my room for 1499.98 and it arrived on time and with great service. Eagle called me the day before and scheduled a delivery window of two to three hours and brought the tv into my house. They set it up on my tv stand and stayed until the the Lcd Tv was on and in working order. On top of that I was lucky enough to see the price drop on my model twice in a week to 1459.99 then 1409.98. I was fortunate enough to read some of these forums and realize that we could get credited back the difference within thirty days. I called Amazon and they took care of the matter immediately. The first time crediting back $40 then the second time $50. (As a sidenote, since then the Tv I bought has gone back up to 1459.98 with shipping) The price is just insanely GREAT! This same tv that I bought for $1409.98 with white glove delivery (aka bringing the tv into your house and making sure it works so you can decide whether or not you are going to accept or refuse the tv) costs $150- $200 on other websites. If I calculated shipping as $150 then I would have basically paid $1259.98. The set I bought, Samsung Lnt4065f costs 1999.99 without tax at best buy, with tax equating to well over $2100! I would again buy from directly from amazon.com (the company and not another third party vendor using amazon as a storefront) for my future big ticket purchases. I hope this helped.
40714
As far as camera quality and picture quality, etc, they are equivalent?I purchased the T700, didn't realize there was a T77 available. I am considering returning and getting the T77 because of the price.
302407
I don't know how much help I can be but I'll give it a shot. I bought the Samsung because I own a Samsung LCD 46" bought in '08. I was quite happy with that TV so I stuck with the Samsung brand. I really think the 46" has a better picture than the 65" LED. Could be because of a consequential loss of picture clarity that comes with larger screen sizes. The UN65 has a dual core processor but if you're really into "smart," I recommend the quad core (more money of course). I subscribe to NFL game replays and they won't load well (and therefore can't view) with the dual core; I have to use my quad core computer. I think the UN has a really reasonable price, but you generally get what you pay for (as the old saying goes). Bottom line . . . I like the UN65 but, at the same time, I am a little disappointed. The only way you'll ever know is to look at them side-by-side and remember, showrooms do not have real-life broadcasts (in most instances) so when you get one home, your picture may not be a great as in the showroom. Hope this helps somewhat and good luck!
964368
You can download manuals for both models from Samsung's web site. (Their server is kind of erratic, you may have to hit web browser's Refresh button once or twice.)Differences I noted:1) B550 is about 7 pounds lighter than the A550.2) B550 has slightly fewer picture color adjustments, but I don't know how important that is.3) B550 removed the headphone jack.Otherwise, they seem pretty close in specs.I saw an A550 and B550 side by side in Best Buy a few weeks ago. The B550 looked brighter, whiter, but I don't know if that is just different settings, or maybe different ages of the display units. You can download manuals for both models from Samsung's web site. (Their server is kind of erratic, you may have to hit web browser's Refresh button once or twice.)Differences I noted:1) B550 is about 7 pounds lighter than the A550.2) B550 has slightly fewer picture color adjustments, but I don't know how important that is.3) B550 removed the headphone jack.Otherwise, they seem pretty close in specs.I saw an A550 and B550 side by side in Best Buy a few weeks ago. The B550 looked brighter, whiter, but I don't know if that is just... » Read More You can download manuals for both models from Samsung's web site. (Their server is kind of erratic, you may have to hit web browser's Refresh button once or twice.)Differences I noted:1) B550 is about 7 pounds lighter than the A550.2) B550 has slightly fewer picture color adjustments, but I don't know how important that is.3) B550 removed the headphone jack.Otherwise, they seem pretty close in specs.I saw an A550 and B550 side by side in Best Buy a few weeks ago. The B550 looked brighter, whiter, but I don't know if that is just different settings, or maybe different ages of the display units. « Show Less
2044462
If you want a good technical review of both, check out Rtings.com. They reviewed the LN5700 last year and will have their review up of the LB6300 tomorrow. The review of the LB5800 series is already up and there are noticeable differences between that series and the LN5700 in terms of motion blur, uniformity, and bright room performance. All are important elements in terms of picture quality, and grey uniformity is particularly important if you want to minimize the "dirty screen effect" inherent to many LCD panel TVs (of course this can vary within the same model unit as well). If the review is similar for the LB6300 series as it is for the LB5800 series, I also think the LB6300 series is the easy choice unless your biggest concern is how it performs in a bright or sunlit room. Hope this helps.
881193
Samsung has its own special 'clear motion rate' that they use to determine the hz level. Other companys do it to with their own wording. Basically in short its like saying....samsungs proprietary image processor provides a smoother and cleaner image than the general old school version or knockoff brand and that being said lends the image to look like its 120hz. When combined with the led backlit technology and the panels 60hz refresh rate its basically equivalent to the modern day 120hz models. I have 4 HDTVs and I can tell you that there is a huge difference between samsung and other brands. This particular tv I have hooked up straight to the cable so I don't even get the luxury's of having crystal clear HDTV you get from having a cable box with HDTV features. I have the brightness turned down all the way to 0 as well lol since its in a bedroom with blacked out curtains. The TV is solid the apps are solid and the fact that samsung is working on an adapter to constantly update the smart features is awesome. The only down side is that this is the start of a new erra. OLED is going to be the norm. Google it for more info but basically your going to get deeper blacks with it because your turning LEDs off not hiding them. For what its worth its an awesome low end smart TV with solid features, images, HDMI! hello-3 i think thats more than my 65" samsung has. Keeping it at 40 inches is a good small-med sized room TV, my recommendation is to get a 46" if you want it for a medium sized room and is you want a living room TV go 55". I regret my 65" purchase - to big. Streatches pixels and makes mediocre cable look terrible because you see every flaw. Hope this helps, if not feel free to ask another question I have no problem providing info/answers to any questions.
750285
This TV has a 60Hz refresh rate. I compared this Samsung LN32B550 with the LG model you mention and I found both are good. However, the colors were more vibrant in the Samsung and there was a 'pop' in the colors. The LG was a little more subdued and not as vivid. Also, I don't recall if the LG swivels or not like the Samsung. If you need more dynamic colors, a punch in the Picture quality, go with the samsung. For me, the 120Hz did nothing to convince me its better than the 60Hz. I really could not tell any difference. People swear there is one, but I cannot tell. They had a demo signal going to all TV's with the 120Hz benefits and you cannot even tell any difference there. Theoretically, the 120Hz should be more cleaner/sharper in fast moving images. But fast moving images are well....fast so you only see them for split seconds. Not much of a difference then since how much can you absorb in that split second ? Video gaming should benefit but again, I don't see any significant improvement here. The 2ms response time is useful for video gaming as it will eliminate ghosting ( i.e. trailing images ) but Samsung's 6ms is good enough. Ideally, anything less than 15-20ms and you're good for video gaming from my experience with LCD refresh rates. Go to your local Best Buy and check it out first. Buy from Amazon if the price is lower, else buy from BestBuy with warranty and all. As is, BB now has no restocking fee when you return a product.
259151
I think I have to agree with Carl Peluso. The Sam's DVP FX811 boasts an 800x480 resolution. The buttons at the bottom of the screen are identical - they're round and placed exactly the same as the FX820. The FX810 has a chrome hinge for the screen, the FX811 is black. If the manual for the two models is word for word identical and they look identical I'd say they're the same. I may get the FX811 and save the $20.
1128941
I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale. I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000... » Read More I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale. « Show Less
894143
Thanks, KS, for commenting about the similarities in the specs. I'm trying to decide between an 850/860 and a 750. And I gotta tell you ... in the store today, the picture on 8's sure seemed crisper and more 3-dimensional than on the 750. The 750 was outstanding, no question! But the 8-series took what I might call depth-of-field to a much higher level. But I don't value the thinness of the 8's, and I don't care about the sound (separate amp, etc). The prices are about the same (for my purposes). I just want the best picture, and the 8's looked better. Can you help me to understand why the 8's might have looked better to me? Thanks, KS, for commenting about the similarities in the specs. I'm trying to decide between an 850/860 and a 750. And I gotta tell you ... in the store today, the picture on 8's sure seemed crisper and more 3-dimensional than on the 750. The 750 was outstanding, no question! But the 8-series took what I might call depth-of-field to a much higher level. But I don't value the thinness of the 8's, and I don't care about the sound (separate amp, etc). The prices are about the same (for my purposes). I just want the best picture, and the 8's looked better. Can you help me to understand why the... » Read More Thanks, KS, for commenting about the similarities in the specs. I'm trying to decide between an 850/860 and a 750. And I gotta tell you ... in the store today, the picture on 8's sure seemed crisper and more 3-dimensional than on the 750. The 750 was outstanding, no question! But the 8-series took what I might call depth-of-field to a much higher level. But I don't value the thinness of the 8's, and I don't care about the sound (separate amp, etc). The prices are about the same (for my purposes). I just want the best picture, and the 8's looked better. Can you help me to understand why the 8's might have looked better to me? « Show Less
331108
We used these on our Epson 3020 which has the same technology as the 6020 just not as many bells and whistles. We have also used the Panasonic and Samsung models that Best Buy had in stock for a variety of fits as my son does not like the Epson and prefers the Samsung (cheaper) model. I think anything RF will work as we now have a collection of 6 glasses and I cannot tell the difference in picture quality. The ONLY reason I did not buy more Epson specific models was we had family coming over and no one stocked the Epson I did not have time to order from Amazon. We love our 3D family movie nights!!! We used these on our Epson 3020 which has the same technology as the 6020 just not as many bells and whistles. We have also used the Panasonic and Samsung models that Best Buy had in stock for a variety of fits as my son does not like the Epson and prefers the Samsung (cheaper) model. I think anything RF will work as we now have a collection of 6 glasses and I cannot tell the difference in picture quality. The ONLY reason I did not buy more Epson specific models was we had family coming over and no one stocked the Epson I did not have time to order from Amazon. We love our 3D family movie... » Read More We used these on our Epson 3020 which has the same technology as the 6020 just not as many bells and whistles. We have also used the Panasonic and Samsung models that Best Buy had in stock for a variety of fits as my son does not like the Epson and prefers the Samsung (cheaper) model. I think anything RF will work as we now have a collection of 6 glasses and I cannot tell the difference in picture quality. The ONLY reason I did not buy more Epson specific models was we had family coming over and no one stocked the Epson I did not have time to order from Amazon. We love our 3D family movie nights!!! « Show Less
687697
You cannot use contrast ratios to compare between brands. They are a manufacture defined value, so each brand's numbers are not equivalent. The Sony looks about equivalent to me, but everywhere I looked the equivalent Samsung is cheaper for the same (and usually by my eye better) picture quality. Add on top of that the better aesthetic value of the Samsung sets and the choice, frankly, is obvious.
43655
The only reason I can see is that Samsung discontinued this t.v, and with the overall design is not as space efficient as any of Samsungs other dlp televisions. I have this one and also a 720p set by samsung which I bought in 10-2006. Just to let you know, Samsung also has on sale a 50" DLP 720p set for $899.I bought this one, and gave the 720p set to my parents, and to be honest with you I didnt notice a difference at all. If youre just breaking into the HD world, Id suggest getting one of the HLT models from samsung that is on sale now on amazon. You wont notice a difference, save yourself hundreds, and will less likely have problems with the set, as I and many others have with this particular model. The only reason I can see is that Samsung discontinued this t.v, and with the overall design is not as space efficient as any of Samsungs other dlp televisions. I have this one and also a 720p set by samsung which I bought in 10-2006. Just to let you know, Samsung also has on sale a 50" DLP 720p set for $899.I bought this one, and gave the 720p set to my parents, and to be honest with you I didnt notice a difference at all. If youre just breaking into the HD world, Id suggest getting one of the HLT models from samsung that is on sale now on amazon. You wont... » Read More The only reason I can see is that Samsung discontinued this t.v, and with the overall design is not as space efficient as any of Samsungs other dlp televisions. I have this one and also a 720p set by samsung which I bought in 10-2006. Just to let you know, Samsung also has on sale a 50" DLP 720p set for $899.I bought this one, and gave the 720p set to my parents, and to be honest with you I didnt notice a difference at all. If youre just breaking into the HD world, Id suggest getting one of the HLT models from samsung that is on sale now on amazon. You wont notice a difference, save yourself hundreds, and will less likely have problems with the set, as I and many others have with this particular model. « Show Less
200908
The major difference is the pjd 5134 is not full H.D. If you go to amazon and search electronics , type in the 5134 and search you will see some reviews on that page , one review said " this is not true H.D. far from it , but the picture quality is very good. When you have a broadcast signal from your provider and or blue ray or any true H.D signal you need true H,D to receive the signal and display true H.D which is 1928x 1080 only that "native resolution is true H.D. AND THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE , i TESTED 3 OR 4 OTHER PROJECTORS , THAT WERE GOOD ,BUT NOT TRUE H.D. For eg. I watched the world cup in true H.D. phenomenal . The key is "native resolution " the one you are asking about is 600x800 the other one is 1928x1080 -true H.D. there is a big difference , that is why you pay more for the one compared to the other , but it is definitely worth it , it depends on how good you want your picture to be , if you want true H.D. get the 7820 true H.D. .AS GOOD AS A MOVIE THEATER OR BETTER ,Mark 850-696-9519 , call if you want to discuss further