For all that purchased this 144, did you wish you had gone smaller with the 132? i'm on the fence on which size I should buy. any insight appreciat
1261404
I love the 144 it's very impressive. If you're using it in your backyard it is big. Well I guess that depends on how big your backyard is. I use mine on camping trips so size doesn't matter. It also depends on the quality of your projector. The bigger the picture the better the projector you need. If not it will be very grainy.
1261405
G. OrderedFrom my experience with 144 the size is huge and looks great. My issue with it, was the frame is a bit weak for the size. I do wish I would've gone smaller but I figured for few bucks I could get bigger
1261406
Don't get me wrong, the 144 is huge, I mean really big, but that being said I'm glad I went with the larger size myself. Especially because my projector doesn't zoom in or out by much. So the bigger screen lets me have more room between the projector and screen.
1261407
Go with the 144! You can always make the picture smaller even with the 144, by moving the projector closer. However, you can't make the picture bigger unless you have a larger display/screen to support it. The 144 gives you more options.
1261408
I have no idea why anyone would want to go smaller. Beyond the size (which is great) you get the bonus of the rear projection option which, after using twice, is AWESOME! Go big, you won't regret it
1261409
No, I wished a bigger one was available. My projector can project up to 300 inches, which would take an outdoor movie to a whole other level.
1261410
I have no regrets! For movies in the backyard where there are sometimes 20 people or more, this screen is FANTASTIC!
923249
This probably is not helpful: I'm delighted with the 45-175mm, but I got it for a steal as an Amazon lightning deal for just under $200. Buying was a no-brainer. So the only real advice I can offer is to be extremely patient and keep your eyes open for a great deal on the 45-175mm.
1676411
Todd, I am sorry to say that I returned the monitor 3 days after I received it. I'm a heating & air conditioning contractor. I wanted a 32" screen to be able to see a larger portion of a mechanical plan all at one time. I have two 21" monitors. I replaced one of them with the 32" monitor. In order to get the resolution good enough to read a drawing I would have to zoom into the drawing to the same point as what I could see on the other 21" monitor. My 21" monitors are Acer with MUCH better overall display than the 32" NEC. I was disappointed the NEC 32" monitor didn't work out for me. However, Amazon handled the return in an excellent manner. Hope that helps. Todd, I am sorry to say that I returned the monitor 3 days after I received it. I'm a heating & air conditioning contractor. I wanted a 32" screen to be able to see a larger portion of a mechanical plan all at one time. I have two 21" monitors. I replaced one of them with the 32" monitor. In order to get the resolution good enough to read a drawing I would have to zoom into the drawing to the same point as what I could see on the other 21" monitor. My 21" monitors are Acer with MUCH better overall display than the 32" NEC. I was disappointed the NEC 32"... » Read More Todd, I am sorry to say that I returned the monitor 3 days after I received it. I'm a heating & air conditioning contractor. I wanted a 32" screen to be able to see a larger portion of a mechanical plan all at one time. I have two 21" monitors. I replaced one of them with the 32" monitor. In order to get the resolution good enough to read a drawing I would have to zoom into the drawing to the same point as what I could see on the other 21" monitor. My 21" monitors are Acer with MUCH better overall display than the 32" NEC. I was disappointed the NEC 32" monitor didn't work out for me. However, Amazon handled the return in an excellent manner. Hope that helps. « Show Less
1214126
I preferred a 175. Now I have a road bike and use 172.5. It's really what you prefer.
491490
Thanks!!!!!! I really appreciate you letting me know! :-) I just got my 1200IS last week, so I'd better order a case. :-) :-) :-)
1291470
Honestly, I don't understand why people are complaining so much. The nibs have never worn down for me, maybe a one is a bit dull, but it's really no big deal. I also love the new feel of the i4 better than the i3's because it feels natural and more substantial, but again that's a preference. I personally have the large and I agree, it is a big too large and I should've gone with a medium.
2139173
Using a Taylor 210, with the recommended 13's. I went back and forth with the 80/20s and Phosphor Bronze. I prefer the 80/20s Bronze. I think they are just a little clearer. The Phosphor Bronze sounds balanced and real good, but a little deeper. But it all boils down to what suits you.
468160
Weird-must just be the number made. I'd never seen the 32" one. In retrospect I'm glad I got 40", but at the time I was thinking I'd probably go with 32 had it been available. (Dang...when I first got my 32 it seemed HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE, and now my 40" just looks 'okay', LOL)
1899783
Best advise: email/call the seller. All the sellers use the same stock photo, so it's not the actual product you are looking to buy. Secondly, I found some of the sellers fudged on the item measurements, so that wasn't a reliable method of determining bar number or size. Get it straight from the donkey's mouth or you might not get what you want and be saddled with a restocking fee. This is coming from experience. FYI: we did this with the second seller we worked with, and got the right size, and we love this product. It's worth the extra money over the other brands.
647060
I didn't go bigger than the stock 275. I went with a more aggressive tread pattern but I probably could have gone up two more sizes with out any problems.
1195471
I myself would not prefer the 21" over the 16". I like the 16" very much. It serves my needs very well.
371404
That's a very individual preference based on your grip and feel for the racquet. Go into a store and Get a feel for the differences in size
1887047
Marc, It looks like the AL2223 has slightly better features. This is the model that I will be purchasing in the coming week or so. The contrast ratio is slightly higher (800:1 as opposed to 700:1) so I think this is a better deal. Maybe others have some feedback that will add to the discussion? : Michael
545267
I went with the HD. (Heavier Duty) At the time I had a 19" screen, I wanted the option to go with a larger monitor later. Which I did, I now have a 27". I called Ergotron and a tech gave me a great suggestion; To make up for the lack of weight until I bought my larger monitor, use a dumbbell. I had a small 8# dumbbell sitting securely behind the monitor. Worked like a charm. I LOVE THIS THING!!!!!!!!!
1332902
I have 2 - 24's with a 28 in the middle. Looks good...I thought it looked better than 3 - 24's
1898701
I think I would go with the 44" model. If I had to do it over again I would jump up to the next size.
2097428
I do not have the 27inch model but use the 21 inch for all my photography as well as AutoCAD and Solidwork design work and can say it is a great monitor and I would buy again. I have the monitor color profiled with X-rite iPhoto2 pro software (easy to do software makes all the adjustments for you) for all my photography work and find the color and contrast to be excellent.