Is this 65" without extending the center column?
1240858
The height of the tripod without the extension and without the ballhead is 44.5 inches tall. With the extension, but without the ballhead, the height is 53.5 inches tall.
1240859
No. The 65" is with the center extension extended. Mine actually measured closer to 67. Hope this helps. It's a great tripod for the money.
1300217
No. The specs say 47" max. The only way to make a 70" work would be to not assemble the upper side shelves.
834268
No, it does not... The leg extensions can add on an extra 15-20" depending on which position you have it in.
891445
If you can't find a kit for 65 inch, I would get 2 of these and overlap them in the middle. You will love it. I also recommend the thing to turn them on when your tv is turned on.
1656094
The center column can be adjusted to a desired length up to nearly its full length. But it is not built like the legs where they can be lengthened or shortened by releasing clamps.
765234
I have a 55" and it fits perfectly with about 2 inches to spare on each side. So, no overhang. A 65" would fit, but you might be a bit wider than the table. Look at the width of both and see what overhang you'd and and if you can live with it.. The table is certainly substantial enough to hold it.
338731
No. The unit measures 16" without any panels attached. I have 16" wide window frames, and the unit just BARELY fits. It's not going to fit in anything under 16" wide.
1682222
No it is not. It is actually, after fully extended about 24 inches long. I used it in an awkward spot in my linen closet to hang cleaning supplies.
2047659
No, not if you assemble it per the manufacturers instructions. There isn't enough height between the shelves.
1189861
I have a Crosley 60 inch TV stand K10005AMA which came with two center support legs. These get installed in the middle of the stand and prevent sagging. My 65 inch TV does not have any sagging problem.
1934769
I can't answer that as it is installed at a location I'm not currently at. I do know it is less than 16" because it would not span existing stud spacing.
637057
I have a 65" on mine and it does just fine. I've also had my 220' self standing on it, so I'm sure it'll support whatever you have.
1690239
No, that is not counted in the width. I would estimate that it extends about 2 ft from the edge of the bed.
637059
I have a 65 inch, 68# on mine with no problem. The unit is solid enough to support much greater weight.
685900
Whoops . Disregard earlier answer . I have the larger stand not this one for my 65" tv.
419448
no. it is 69 cm, or about 2.2". but if you're bothered about that much variance, perhaps you should have something specially built for your site. that 69 cm is for the OUTSIDE edges of the entire length of the shelves with uprights.
959549
Measured again more carefully and it is 15.75 inches end to end without brackets. Sorry about first answer.