What is the difference between the clear model and the clear lenses model?
243569
I don't think there is a difference. I'd recommend getting the yellow tinted ones however if you're going to be shooting outside. I've got em and they work great
243570
I am not sure. I have some with clear lenses that I really like. The lens is optically good and has very little distortion
243571
I don't think there is a difference in my opinion but if your going to be shooting outside any I would recommend yellow tinted lens they work great inside and out
1264650
Immage coating isthe diference, new lens is sharper and handels better the lens flaire
1969020
No, it is the modification number of the model itself. If you need corrective lenses, choose a different model which would have "correction" or "optical" in its name, like "Vanquisher Optical".
233937
It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb. (630g))- Most of other features are the same.I hope this will be helpful. It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb.... » Read More It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb. (630g))- Most of other features are the same.I hope this will be helpful. « Show Less
1671730
This lens is a "DO" (Diffractive Optics). Although not officially an "L" series the build quality it very similar to it with the main difference being the style of optics internal to the lens. It is far higher quality than the standard EF or EF-S lenses.
272579
Clear Care was recommended to me by my eye doctor and while I cannot compare it to Sauflon, I can highly recommend this product. I wear Acuvue Oasys with Hydraclear Plus. These are a very thin lenses and I have used several different products to clean them. Clear Care has one distinct advantage. I have worn the same 30-day lenses for over a year. They have not lost their shape and I have excellent vision as the day I bought them. I take my lenses out every night and soak them a minimum of 8 hours. I read a lot and wear these lenses 12 to 16 hours each day. Amazon beats Wal-Mart's prices and since I have Amazon Prime, my product arrives in two days. Convenience and quality all in one! Clear Care was recommended to me by my eye doctor and while I cannot compare it to Sauflon, I can highly recommend this product. I wear Acuvue Oasys with Hydraclear Plus. These are a very thin lenses and I have used several different products to clean them. Clear Care has one distinct advantage. I have worn the same 30-day lenses for over a year. They have not lost their shape and I have excellent vision as the day I bought them. I take my lenses out every night and soak them a minimum of 8 hours. I read a lot and wear these lenses 12 to 16 hours each day. Amazon beats Wal-Mart's prices and... » Read More Clear Care was recommended to me by my eye doctor and while I cannot compare it to Sauflon, I can highly recommend this product. I wear Acuvue Oasys with Hydraclear Plus. These are a very thin lenses and I have used several different products to clean them. Clear Care has one distinct advantage. I have worn the same 30-day lenses for over a year. They have not lost their shape and I have excellent vision as the day I bought them. I take my lenses out every night and soak them a minimum of 8 hours. I read a lot and wear these lenses 12 to 16 hours each day. Amazon beats Wal-Mart's prices and since I have Amazon Prime, my product arrives in two days. Convenience and quality all in one! « Show Less
883998
Main difference is sensor. Both are exactly the same size and will probably fit in jacket pocket with lens such as 27/2.8. You should also look at Fuji x100s which has a shallow profile due to build in lens
1264648
This is the older version. The newest version is much sharper, focuses more accurately, and is definitely the lens you want to purchase.
1327640
Difference is the one with the red ring is the de-clicked cine version. It also features a grooved focus ring that allows for a follow focus to be attached to the lens.
1337729
There are two schools of thought. I would say the most important question answer personally is whether you are intending on selling the lens at some point afterward in almost new condition. If you are then keeping a clear filter will keep it looking new. There is a small optical penalty to the clear filter. Whether you will be able to tell is also a personal choice. I would say a new phtotographer won't notice the difference.
1540600
It did change the clearness, but it all depends on what you are looking for. Mine works way better now.
1718567
Yes, the only difference is it does not attach to the lens. It is a much cheaper version that is perfect 98% of the time, and the other 2% is probably me doing something wrong.
1700141
I have the clear one and it works very well. They all look alike so maybe they would all work the same.
606622
The new one is made of fancy plastic and the old one has some metal. The new one is slightly sharper. Another major difference is that the old one has 77mm filter size and the new one had 82mm filter size. You have to be pretty finicky about image quality to notice the difference.
74731
They are similar, they both swivel. Apart from the "look", there might be a difference in the width of the beam (spot light versus flood). I have not ever compared them side-by-side. The lenses are different. The fish eye one (pictured) has a clear lens, and the other one has a diffused "crystallized" lens.
1114915
This lens is newer, lighter, and smaller than the other one but has a 1/3 stop difference at maximum aperture. (f/3.5-6.3 vs. f/3.5-5.6) The more expensive one also comes with a lens hood and case, and has a focus distance indicator. This one doesn't come with any of them but you can always buy a lens hood and case separately. There are other technical differences but these are the differences most people are concerned with.
1595067
I have personally found the 1.0 set up better for clear. Gives more control on the amount of clear u put on.