Difference between WD-60737 and WD-60C9? Does anybody know what the difference is between the WD-60737 and the WD-60C9? They're both 60-inch DLP, 1080p, 120Hz, look identical (right down to the dimensions and weight), and appear to have all the same features, yet the Amazon prices for them are $184 apart. Difference between WD-60737 and WD-60C9? Does anybody know what the difference is between the WD-60737 and the WD-60C9? They're both 60-inch DLP, 1080p, 120Hz, look identical (right down to the... » Read More Difference between WD-60737 and WD-60C9? Does anybody know what the difference is between the WD-60737 and the WD-60C9? They're both 60-inch DLP, 1080p, 120Hz, look identical (right down to the dimensions and weight), and appear to have all the same features, yet the Amazon prices for them are $184 apart. « Show Less
1241404
@Gene, I'm thinking about getting the 737 as well but I'm ify about the quality vs lcd quality (mainly the blacks) and the fact that dlps are dying out. What are your thoughts?
1241405
The difference is the the 737 has the 5G plush processing with the 12 bit color depth. Which is different than the 36 bit color display and the 6 color mixer, which both TV's have. The other has 6 or 8 bit depth. It makes the picture look nicer. The cheaper one does also have some sort of plush processing that smooths out standard def stuff, but this ones is better. The color bit depth is the main thing though. I'm getting the 737. I'm waiting until Christmas season starts though, to see if the price drops any more.
1241406
My Info shows the C9 supports the 5G Plush as well.The main concensus seems to be that the C9 is basically a 737 distributed via Costco and other big box stores.
232296
Amazon have been sending me the WD20EARS-00MVWB0! If you do buy it, please buy it thru my Amazon Store, its the same price and I get a small kickback from the sale.
1212446
Yeah, I'm late.....But if any new buyers are juggling this topic, I've discovered some information from researching Blu-Ray HTiB's for well over a year. In regards to the differences in the two models, the 570 can produce a stronger, crisper sound than the 370. The 570 also has built-in WiFi, you have to purchase a separate component to stream content, wireless, to the 370. The DLNA support for the 370 had been of and on, so its caused confusion. It currently supports it with the latest update.
59870
The 600U has a few more bells & whistles. It accepts a cable card if your cable company supports that, has a VGA input for your computer, can display picture in picture (or split screen!) from 2 sources, has better speakers, and in my humble opinion looks a little nicer. There is no difference in the picture quality, both will have the same great picture. Both display in the same resolution. I just had to make the decision on what to buy, and I saved the $$ and got the 60U last week. The only perk I was really interested in was the picture in picture, but that's wasn't worth it to me, and Dish Network has a HD receiver that will do it internally (if I go that route). Anyway, hope this helps! Matt
1101899
The only listed difference between the two systems is that this one says it has dual NVIDIA GeForce GT750M cards, and the 59390951 model on the Lenovo website says it has dual NVIDIA GeForce GT755M. That's it. 750M versus 755M. That most likely means the cards are very, very similar, with the 755 being a slightly newer reproduction from the same line. Performance difference between the two is likely to negligible, especially when running them in a dual configuration. Also - the model on Amazon is selling for $100 less right now, and that is including the $400 coupon Lenovo says they are offering. (Base of 1599 minus 400 = 1199)
732129
I'd like to add a little additional information to the excellent explanation from Jaygyver. I have both drives, an older WD1002FAEX and a newer WD1003FZEX. When I purchased the WD1002 model it was priced about the same as the newer model is today. I believe the current price disparity is due to two factors: the differences in suppliers as described by Jaygver, and also a design change. I noticed that my WD1002 was slightly heavier than the WD1003, and after some research discovered that was due to the WD1002 having two magnetic platters while the WD1003 was a newer single platter design. Evidently the WD engineers were able to simplify and hopefully improve the design. For me, both drives perform excellently and I'm equally pleased with both. However, I have seen discussions on certain tech forums in which intense gaming purists believe the older two platter design is better, and that WD changed the design simply to cut manufacturing costs. Thus the high prices for the WD1002 is due to it's scarcity (since it's now discontinued) and their belief that it's slightly better in both performance and ruggedness. As I said above, however, both perform equally well for me, and they're both Western Digital Black Series with 5 year warranties, so it's a no brainer to go with the best deal price wise.
1847911
I don't believe there is any difference. The cheaper price is probably due to the high sales volume Amazon generates for them.
1819642
Only thing i notice on the higher priced one is a higher buffer speed, (the lower cost Drive actually has a much higher write speed for DVD only) 16x vs 12x but the (lower priced one does not Burn Blu-Ray) only DvD. While the (higher one does Burn Blu-Ray.) If you want to burn Blu-Ray Disc get the higher priced one and if you want (just to play Blu-Ray then get the lower priced one.)
1776373
I called Toshiba about this and was told it's just a market difference. The TVs are the same, the models just vary in each market. I guess online retailers just mix up the models.
2095886
@ RonnieI have both the 980H and the 981HD. I also have the Samsung LN-T5271F. If you like the DV-981HD with your 5271F, you will probably like the recently released DV-983H. I have a Toshiba HD-A35 which has the same upscaler chip as the DV-983H The picture quality of the HD-A35 using the same chip is better than the DV-981H. The DV-983H is a bit pricey though and I wonder whether the HD-A35 might be a better choice.
448858
Quentin's right on there - the color difference is noticeable and does look better.Also, with the 120hz processor, it accepts 1080p over the component-in input, which means you'll get a much better picture from non-HDMI devices such as the XBox 360.Also, at the shops I've seen lots of banding issues (read up on this - common problem) with the 62U, but didn't see that at all with the 92Us.Locally the price differential is only $400 ($3400 at local stores, vs $3000 for the 62U). The $1k difference is probably due to price breaks on the to-be-discontinued 62U line. Quentin's right on there - the color difference is noticeable and does look better.Also, with the 120hz processor, it accepts 1080p over the component-in input, which means you'll get a much better picture from non-HDMI devices such as the XBox 360.Also, at the shops I've seen lots of banding issues (read up on this - common problem) with the 62U, but didn't see that at all with the 92Us.Locally the price differential is only $400 ($3400 at local stores, vs $3000 for the 62U). The $1k difference is probably due to price breaks on the to-be-discontinued... » Read More Quentin's right on there - the color difference is noticeable and does look better.Also, with the 120hz processor, it accepts 1080p over the component-in input, which means you'll get a much better picture from non-HDMI devices such as the XBox 360.Also, at the shops I've seen lots of banding issues (read up on this - common problem) with the 62U, but didn't see that at all with the 92Us.Locally the price differential is only $400 ($3400 at local stores, vs $3000 for the 62U). The $1k difference is probably due to price breaks on the to-be-discontinued 62U line. « Show Less
1266271
There is no difference. I decided to purchase from Amazon because it is cheaper.
2252376
By your question I can't tell what the 'cheaper one listed by you at this link' actually is...there is no link to it...just a link to Amazon. If you could let me know what that other one was I might be able to explain what differences there are. With that in mind...I bought this one because of the durability of this particular unit. I did some research and this one had a much lower failure rate and is supposed to last much longer than most of the others.
1929602
Sorry, I do not know the difference. If you do a chat with a tech on Amazon or call them they will tell you. They are very helpful.
322101
There is no difference in the product or amount received. The difference is in the seller and shipping. The $59 one is not charging for shipping, while the other one sells for less but then charges for shipping. Hope that helps.
53578
from what I can see, the WD-60737 has "Improved Dark Field Imager", and "Improved SharpEdge". Otherwise they are the same. Unfortunately, I have not seen these side by side to see if this makes any noticeable difference.
310069
Thanks for the response. I also bought the 57731, from Best Buy, which was selling it this past weekend for $1,999. That was before HD cable rebate ($100 plus free installation... if you don't mind waiting almost 2 weeks) & Rewards Card rebate (another $120). That made the net $1,780, not bad for a 57" 1080p DLP...In any case I don't need the SD Card reader because I have a computer connected to it which contains my music and photos.