Im a tattoo artist and am looking for a good lens for finished pieces. Would you recommend this for my line of work? Lighting is between low/med
1259412
Depends on what camera body you are using. If it's a Canon T1i then maybe not, if it's a T3i then maybe yes since it has better low-light capability. You will probably want to use a tripod in any case because this lens does not have image stabilization integrated into it.
1259413
The lenses works well for close up shots. Good detail, etc. I would recommend you get a flash ring to get the proper lighting. Also available on Amazon &#128515;
1259414
I'd recommend. It's a VERY good price and the details it captures are pretty good!These are some images I took with mine for a body paint work:https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10858387_698165666949521_1671025803695530835_n.jpg?oh=0d1c04a0ce0282fbac658687adcfce66&oe;=553ECE07&__gda__=1429180863_cf2efc720600a896eeaeec419bf1c898https://scontent-b-gru.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10801508_688715584561196_3304394751522117514_n.jpg?oh=671fbea0cfcd48f4918b4e6e7c21ed6a&oe;=550069CDHope my answer was helpful :) I'd recommend. It's a VERY good price and the details it captures are pretty good!These are some images I took with mine for a body paint work:https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10858387_698165666949521_1671025803695530835_n.jpg?oh=0d1c04a0ce0282fbac658687adcfce66&oe;=553ECE07&__gda__=1429180863_cf2efc720600a896eeaeec419bf1c898https://scontent-b-gru.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10801508_688715584561196_3304394751522117514_n.jpg?oh=671fbea0cfcd48f4918b4e6e7c21ed6a&oe;=550069CDHope my... » Read More I'd recommend. It's a VERY good price and the details it captures are pretty good!These are some images I took with mine for a body paint work:https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10858387_698165666949521_1671025803695530835_n.jpg?oh=0d1c04a0ce0282fbac658687adcfce66&oe;=553ECE07&__gda__=1429180863_cf2efc720600a896eeaeec419bf1c898https://scontent-b-gru.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10801508_688715584561196_3304394751522117514_n.jpg?oh=671fbea0cfcd48f4918b4e6e7c21ed6a&oe;=550069CDHope my answer was helpful :) « Show Less
1259415
The lenses works well for close up shots. Good detail, etc. I would recommend you get a flash ring to get the proper lighting. Also available on Amazon �
1813089
This isn't a professional lens by any means but if you're taking photos in a well lit space or outside it should be more than adequate. The more you zoom in with this lens the more it limits light reception, so not the best lens for poor lighting conditions. Until you're willing to spend in the $1000's there aren't many other options. Disclaimer; I'm not a professional photographer...just a hobbyist.
123476
It seems the art lens has higher quality optics which give better contrast and sharper images, although to the average photographer the difference would be slight. The Sigma 50mm 1.4 for $400 works great, and I have no complaints at all.
342852
Overall I am delighted with the image quality of this lens. I'd prefer to use the 24mm setting to minimize distortion in a group of people (if conditions permit). I use it mainly as a landscape lens and still use it extensively.
305772
The Image Quality of this lens is phenomenal. My Key Points that makes this lens Better than the 28-300:-Razor Sharp-Compact/light weight-1.8/f aperture for indoor photography-Having it a prime isn't as versatile, but creates a creative atmosphere for you to be challenged. -Good for Group shots, as well as portraits-Did I mention it has a GOLD RING on it? :D-Little distortion, but what do you expect from anything under 35mm-It is my to-go travel lens because I am most likely going to take scenic pictures and not birds-Shallow depth of field and the bokeh is awesome! with little natural Vignetting, I think it is a bit pleasing. The Image Quality of this lens is phenomenal. My Key Points that makes this lens Better than the 28-300:-Razor Sharp-Compact/light weight-1.8/f aperture for indoor photography-Having it a prime isn't as versatile, but creates a creative atmosphere for you to be challenged. -Good for Group shots, as well as portraits-Did I mention it has a GOLD RING on it? :D-Little distortion, but what do you expect from anything under 35mm-It is my to-go travel lens because I am most likely going to take scenic pictures and not birds-Shallow depth of... » Read More The Image Quality of this lens is phenomenal. My Key Points that makes this lens Better than the 28-300:-Razor Sharp-Compact/light weight-1.8/f aperture for indoor photography-Having it a prime isn't as versatile, but creates a creative atmosphere for you to be challenged. -Good for Group shots, as well as portraits-Did I mention it has a GOLD RING on it? :D-Little distortion, but what do you expect from anything under 35mm-It is my to-go travel lens because I am most likely going to take scenic pictures and not birds-Shallow depth of field and the bokeh is awesome! with little natural Vignetting, I think it is a bit pleasing. « Show Less
858189
Hi, thanks question. I think this lens is good for portraits. My recommendation is AF-S 50mm F1.8G, AF-S 35mm F1.8G. If certain distance is short focus , would be good if necessary zoom can afford. Thanks in advance.
1414088
I have used mine for astrophotography but it is on the slow end if what is possible. For occasional use it is fine, but if this will be its main use you may well get frustrated. How well does your camera handle noise at high ISO? I don't think 1/3 stop should make enough difference for you to change your mind if this is the lens you prefer. It is very light and the IQ on full frame is fantastic. I have since bought a 24 - 70 f2.8 and despite the longer focal length I use this at night for the extra speed. So for dedicated astrophotography lens consider something faster. For occasional use it will do the job.
150330
My opinion: This lens is perfect for tourism, because you want a light baggage to travel anywhere. This lens is very flexinility about zoom (10x) and a good sharpness buy lower than a fix lens, for this reason for a great shot i prefer a fix lens for the sharpness or when i have low ligth i need a lens with good aperture (2.8 or less). For amateur photographer it's a recommendable lens for shots for memories, but if you want more sharpness, then i recommend a fix lens.
824633
I find the 28 to 70 lens to be a really great lens, sharp, easy to use, fast focus but a bit heavy when used for an event such as weddings. I would recommend looking at 24 - 70mm lens by sigma.
1603398
It is primarily a metal lens. There maybe some internal parts that aren't metal or glass, but it is metal on the mount and exterior. I would say that it is a good focal length for portraits, but is a little sharp for such a purpose. Of course, you could always soften things in post.
2059967
The lens has a maximum aperture of f4, if the lighting is really poor, a lens with a maximum f2.8 or 1.4 would give more flexibility. This is a nice lens and good for portraits but a prime ens may be better in there circumstances. I use a 50mm f1.4
416863
Yes, I highly recommend this lens as the budget option to my aurora borealis photography workshop clients, since it should be very sharp in corners. The premiere nighttime lens I recommend is the Nikkor 14-24mm, about 6x the cost.
1381524
Like any tool, it depends on what you want to use it for. This is probably the best lens out there for wide angle, night sky photography (although the 35mm 1.4 is very good too), and will be good for a wide variety of applications. Either one will do well in low light, but since I usually take photos of people, I have a preference for the 35mm. Either lens, when used in bright light, loses a lot of their advantages unless you intentionally place your camera in aperture priority mode and keep shooting in wide apertures.
1125760
No, its not "THE" best, but it is one of the best. It is a sharp, quick lens, quite good for low lighting or for a fabulous bokeh. It should be part of your arsenal for sure; I know its part of mine. Cheers
2041776
It is all about quality. The L glass will deliver you a very well controled CA, good quality in the edges and a wonderful color retention. The 50mm f/1.4 is good and if you dont require the state of the art you will be good with that.
143452
It is a really nice lens. Though if you want portrait or medium telephoto, the 135 f/2 or the 70-200 f/2.8 are both fantastic as well, and maybe better suited.
1796673
I'd put it in the 1.4 group... I love this lens. Tact sharp and can focus up close to your subject.