Is the Vortex TalonHD worth the upgrade from the Diamondbacks? I will be using the bins for birding most of the time.
1260997
That's a great question, The Talon Hd's run about $250-350 more than the Diamondbacks, I Currently own the Diamondback 10 x 42, I'm extremely pleased with them. I would recommend going to a local retailer, like maybe a Cabales? or a store that is very big, and tell the sales clerk you want to compare the Diamondback to the Talon Hd. Then pick something to focus on in the store as far away as possible, and switch back and forth between the two. You may be able to determine if the extra money is worth it? Vortex has a lifetime VIP warranty. If I had the extra money to upgrade to the Talon HD? I would, just because each step up with the Vortex bino's, gets better and better, but I have many different outdoor Items I purchase, so I have to set a budget on each item. Excellent Optics! Good Luck! Enjoy the outdoors
1260998
I did that very thing and the view is a little clearer..but it's not a whole lot different,not sure if it's worth double the price but the talons are really nice.
1260999
I am perfectly happy with the Diamond backs I wouldn't spend any extra money they are all you need to bird watch.
707524
What about the DC25? I'm thinking about buying that one. Does it have the same problems as the DC17 or have they improved it? I looked at it's reviews. There's only 9, but they're pretty good.
2133909
Yes they are perfect for birding. You will not be disappointed. You can spend 3 times them amount and get less quality.
1408958
I would recommend a Perch and Go Clear view carrier which amazon has one for $15 cheaper then what I paid. I have two. and travel alot with my birds. its taller but narrower. It does not have food or water dish so you may need to put in at least weighted water dish if you travel very far. the perch they include is plastic but I replaced with concrete perch but you would not have to do that.
1349208
Best would be the Avenger ABF65, the 90 would be too large, 50 too small. 65 should balance nicely and unless you need a lot of line ( 590 m of 20 lb for the 90 vs 320 for the 65) the 65 seems your best choice.
670333
Don't know. I am pleased with the binoculars for birding-sharp, clear image, decent brightness. Monarch series received high ranking in Cornell ornithological lab evaluations.
605269
In my opinion, Vortex is an excellent company with an outstanding warranty program. I own this pair of binos and am very pleased with them. As to your question, I did a little digging and here is what I found: Vortex is an American company that operates out of Middleton, WI, but they don't make the glass there. They import. From what I have found, the different lines they offer are made in different countries; the crossfires come out of China; the diamondbacks out of the Philippines, the vipers come from Japan.
1283678
Absolutely. The optics is superb, its razor sharp and no chromatic abberation is visible. But keep in mind, it's a 8x power scope, so the angular resolution is of a 8x power scope too. You will can identify any bird with it, but no insects ;)
298679
Sure--wildlife viewing is primarily what I use them for. I keep them by a window overlooking my bird feeders and a vacant lot that's full of quail, doves and the occasional hawk. The only possible problem I can think of is the 7x magnification--it's fine at suburban range, but I live in Nevada, where it's common to be able to look for 20 or 30 miles across the desert. If you'll be some distance from your objective, Nikon makes a 10x50 version of these that might suit you better. The tradeoffs would be increased weight and a smaller field of view at a given distance. For general use, though, I like the 7x35s. Sure--wildlife viewing is primarily what I use them for. I keep them by a window overlooking my bird feeders and a vacant lot that's full of quail, doves and the occasional hawk. The only possible problem I can think of is the 7x magnification--it's fine at suburban range, but I live in Nevada, where it's common to be able to look for 20 or 30 miles across the desert. If you'll be some distance from your objective, Nikon makes a 10x50 version of these that might suit you better. The tradeoffs would be increased weight and a smaller field of view at a given distance. For general use, though,... » Read More Sure--wildlife viewing is primarily what I use them for. I keep them by a window overlooking my bird feeders and a vacant lot that's full of quail, doves and the occasional hawk. The only possible problem I can think of is the 7x magnification--it's fine at suburban range, but I live in Nevada, where it's common to be able to look for 20 or 30 miles across the desert. If you'll be some distance from your objective, Nikon makes a 10x50 version of these that might suit you better. The tradeoffs would be increased weight and a smaller field of view at a given distance. For general use, though, I like the 7x35s. « Show Less
812710
Not that I can find with a quick googling. Of course, I cannot find such specific conditions of review for others either. 9x32 is a pretty rare power. Clarity is not too specific, but I assume you could break it into contrast and sharpness, both pretty good for the money here. If you are seriously into scouting game you probably want something a bit better, though. Zen-Ray 8x42, Vortex Solo 8x36 , something like that. The main issue with this is the tight focuser ring. Contrast is very good, sharpness good. (better than the BG binoculars). I'd back off to 7x or 8x for scouting and spend a bit more.
1849226
Never used the Jaybirds, but the one advantage they have over the Backbeat GO 2's is nearly twice the battery life (up to 8 hours vs 4.5). Since I love the fit, functionality, and sound of the BBG2's, battery life is the only downside...but not enough to make me regret my purchase. If I could do it all over, I wouldn't change a thing.
1618376
As a former aircraft mechanic...if you're looking to add a stereo system to a fairing I would seek out a fairing designed for one. The Memphis Shades Batwing Fairing is nice by itself but not designed for add-ons.
503067
This link answered my questions before I decided on the Monarch 5. Hopefully it will do the same for you.http://www.birdwatching-bliss.com/nikon-monarch-binoculars.html
1134093
You'd be able to see the birds, but I think a scope would be a better choice. These are great binoculars for the price, but I think you would be disappointed if you try to view nests over 200 feet away.
426228
There are lots of opinions on that. Stick with the same length and weight bolt that comes with it (can't remember exact specs at the moment.) I've shot a few different types of 100 gr. broad heads and all flew with the same degree of accuracy.
622011
I use a Revelli, don't know the model but probably got it from Amazon, but don't necessarily recommend it for birdwatching because it is heavy. Birdwatching usually involves a lot of walking & a telescope/tripod combination has to be a compromise between steadiness & portability. Because of my age I don't go on long walks any more & confine birdwatching to my back yard. I also use the tripod for photography & it is good & steady for that.
864304
Vortex fans are the best. Fo a google search for best price. Super quiet and last forever