how do they compare against the SR-80i? is the difference worth 20$?
1244486
This is one of those personal experiences where you'd best find a place to audition them for your own perspective, then purchase locally. My son, who has very senitive ears, noticed a bit more presence and definition in quitter passages in the 80i model than the 60i.
511851
I bet it is the attachments although I am not completely positive. I think that was the difference when I first looked at them. If it is $80 or so less ; I can guarantee it. Whatever you pay, it is well worth it and you will be happy each time you use it (kinda like, I sure am glad I bought that thing). Good luck!!!
2231695
The Valhalla does drive 32-ohm headphones well. I have the sr60i and it sounds great, particularly for guitar-driven rock music.If the sr80i is your only headphone, you might want to consider the Schiit Magni, which I have, or for a tube sound, the newer Vali, which I do not.
400978
Wow man I wish I could answer that question. I really don't know. I mean it's a $60 sub. I'd think if you're sincerely concerned about those technicalities a more expensive setup is more for your liking.
1643158
I had actually emailed polk tech support to ask that question before buying. They indicated that the MC80 was the better product line and used higher quality materials. I haven't personally listened to the RC80i and then the MC80 directly so I can't say exactly what the difference in quality of components means in terms of the sound - the MC80 sounds very lifelike with voice reproduction and i would guess it is slightly better than the RC80i.
687604
They're better; you're going to get what you pay for. These headphones are a step up from the SR-80s obviously and offer a bit more of a rich, clear sound. These headphones are absolutely amazing for the money, but you will be happy with either pair. You won't be disappointed unless you're looking for something with a lot of bass. These headphones are not meant for bass: they're intended to have precise clarity and a wide range that enables you to listen to your music with a different perspective. As my friend said when I lent him my headphones: "it's like I'm listening to my favorite music for the first time. I keep discovering new sounds and instruments that I simply didn't know was there before." They're worth every penny, but if you get the SR-80s, you won't be disappointed.
275210
Honestly, I can not compare as I have not tried the other. Obviously, it has lots more power. As a previous audiophile, I can tell you that although "sound bars" are convenient they do not compare with real amplifiers and reals speakers. I can tell you I am happy with the sound, and the digital input works well with my 60 inch 1080p 3D TV. My only complaint is when you use digital input you have to use the rinky dink remote that came with the sound bar to control the volume. My advise is don't skimp on sound it is just as important as the picture when it comes to watching movies. Honestly, I can not compare as I have not tried the other. Obviously, it has lots more power. As a previous audiophile, I can tell you that although "sound bars" are convenient they do not compare with real amplifiers and reals speakers. I can tell you I am happy with the sound, and the digital input works well with my 60 inch 1080p 3D TV. My only complaint is when you use digital input you have to use the rinky dink remote that came with the sound bar to control the volume. My advise is don't skimp on sound it is just as important as the picture when it comes to watching movies.
1489849
TheA-30 is definitely a better bet. Just received one 2 weeks ago and no regrets at all. Even upconverts regular dvd's beautifully.
1507563
I was told this when I asked the same question on another forum: "the SD800IS had a better constructed body and feel, the SD850IS felt cheap when you A/B them. The power button is very small for a camera of this size. It requires most to use their finger nails to activate. Lastly, the shutter lag is longer on the SD850IS. The SD850IS is more of the SD700IS's successor rather than the SD800IS. The body style is exactly the same and it uses the same 35mm lens rather than the 28mm.... There are a lot of people who really liked the wide angle lens part of the 800IS. You can take better indoor, landscape etc. pics." I went with the 800 IS in the end.
914366
Hi M., sorry I didn't get right back to you...Yes, I'm surprised that people aren't commenting. Sound is not an insignificant element! Soooo... Does the 210 sound more "lively" and "present"... more Sony-like!? :-) If so, I certainly should have bought THAT one recently when I went to Sangean (El Monte, CA) distribution and swapped 400's, after I lost FM reception on my old one!Thanks,Alan
2235016
Hi Ben. Sorry, can't give you a compare of IE800's to Solo2 or HD700. I haven't owned them or listened to compare. I read in some reviews where people compared IE800 as little brothers of HD800, which are a higher model compared to HD700. What I can tell you about IE800 is following. These are very tiny year buds and the way how they are constructed they are suited more for listening while seating still. They only come with rubber tips that don't hold firmly in your year canal and you don't have the option of wrapping the cable around the year like you'll find in Sure models. I personally find myself having to push them back in place while walking. They also come with a very short cable which you may find a problem as well. You may want to check if Sennheiser offers an additional longer cable sold separately. If you intend using year buds while in active motion, I think Sure SE846 or SE535 models will be more suitable. SE535 have very weak base, in my opinion. SE846 are comparable to IE800. Sure's also come with polyfoam tips that expand in your year canal and hold in place more firmly and also provide better sound isolation. Hope this helps.
1284352
I have both and I used the new 20i last week in the plane. In my opinion QC 15 is better in noise cancelling but I like the 20i to carry around. I used 20i in the bus and in the car with IPHONE listing music and I like it. Quality QC 15 is better in the plane but to carry around I like 20i
1540500
Sounds like you are used to the sound of great open back headphones. I will say that in terms of treble detail you may find the sr80e to have an edge on these but in terms of overall sound, these will bring the articulate and accurate bass that is absent in the grados. The sr850's for me excel across the entire sound spectrum, they are excellent for movies and especially video games. Soundstage is truly excellent. Gta V has never sounded so alive. Music is much more immersive and balanced comparing to the sr80, despite it being open back. Hope this helps.
2145502
As far as I know, the differences are minimal....Both are excellent; save the $20,go with the 190XB. I love mine.
176604
I answered this yesterday, but long story short, for what you are doing, I would go with the 80mm unit. You will be happy with it.
1284354
I have both and I used the new 20i last week in the plane. In my opinion QC 15 is better in noise cancelling but I like the 20i to carry around.I used 20i in the bus and in the car with IPHONE listing music and I like it. Quality QC 15 is better in the plane but to carry around I like 20i
184539
The T-40s have an extra pair of speaker and likely more power for $20. I haven't heard to T-20 but if you think of what you can buy for $20 anymore--they're worth it.