What's the difference between the IE2 and the SIE2? (Other than the color and the arm strap.)
1246945
The SIE2 is designed for active "sporty" use. It has fewer right angles on the wires which should lead to longer life. I think there are also some water resistant qualities. The main difference is the location of the control button: the IE2 has it in the middle of the right earbud wire like Apple's design and the SIE2 has the button integrated into the Y where the cables split for each ear.
1246946
It has all got to do with moisture and water resistance.Wearing during work outs will expose your earbuds to sweaty hands and body. The speaker within the ear console has a micro fabric water resistant cloth cover that keeps moisture out and lets sound pass through.
1246947
One is a sport model and seems to be more equipped to handle sweat from working out the ie2 according to specs online is 1.5 grams heavier.
1344728
That particular one is the V. I looked up the V2 and a white model came up, same price, same description. I'm not sure what the difference is. I actually purchased the V as a gift so I don't know much about it, as it was recommended by someone. I'd say do a little more research because I'm not 100% sure. Hope this helps
1241638
Pretty much the same headphone with one exception: the SIE2i has an inline remote/mic controls music and takes calls with the press of a button. If you plan to use with a iPhone/smartphone, might be something to consider. I'm my case, I use the headphones for running and didn't opt for the microphone feature--wanted to save on weight.
2232744
The Differences are that One is only a Bluetooth Auxiliar Handset Whitout SIM Card Slot, the other One is a Complete 2G GSM Handset with SIM Card Slot Capability and Use like a Bluetooth Auxiliar Handset too
198204
I think the only difference is the size/shape and perhaps some inside software changes too. The G2 responds pretty quickly to button presses where the G1 is a tad slower. I started with the G2 and now I have the G1 and am completely satisfied. The G2 is smaller and sleeker looking, but with a $200 price tag versus a $50 price tag, it was easy to make my choice. The G1 is about the size of a large ipod video, but it is still lightweight though.
1624270
The IE800 is a giant step up in clarity. The sound quality is greatly improved. Whether it's worth the price is up to you. The negative for the IE800 is that there's a lot of cable noise (microphonics) if you wear it cable-down. If cable-over-the-ears works for you, then it's no problem.
179317
They are the best IEM I currently own... Whether they are the best I can buy, please refer below: In the current market, the following are the other UIEMs I researched on: 1. AKG K3003 2. Sennheiser ie800 3. FitEar ToGo334 Each of the above mentioned have their own sound signature, as well as, respective pros and cons. But, I chose the SE846 for the following reasons: 1. It has removable cables (K3003 cables are not removable and the ie800 are partially removable only from middle section). It is important to me, knowing that, cables are usually the first thing that wears out in earphones, and, because I am quite picky about the comfort around my ears; 2. You are able to slightly adjust the sound signature through the replaceable noozles (this was a big factor to me as well, since I live in a country where I cannot test either one of the above mentioned, so, to be able to adjust the sound signature is very much like a risk management :-P...); 3. Heard great things about FitEar ToGo 334, but, not very easy to find them. Having said the above, there is another category of IEMs i.e. custom in ear monitors (CIEMs), there are good brands such as JH Audio, 1964 Ears, Ultimate Ears in this category. Unfortunately, I live in a country whereby it is too troublesome to get custom fitted IEMs; however, if you live in a country where the afore mentioned brands have their representative stores/dealers, please go and check out. By the way, JH Audio has recently launched their new flagship JH Roxanne. Based on the initial feedbacks, it seems that, they sound awesome. Hope the above mentioned, answers your question Cheers Simon T.
1082168
I just saw the E series.. The only difference is that the E series doesnt come with bluetooth and its cheaper..
67142
se846 blows away the se535. The lows are full on the se846 as much as you want. The highs are brighter and smoother. The mids are more accurate and better separation of sounds. Having a good source of music is essential. An iPhone cant cut it. Astell&Kern;, Hifiman or Ibasso have good ones.I owned both se535 and se846 also se425 and se315. The se425 is terrible and the se315 is dull.SE846 is an amazing iem
1611806
X-E2 is the next generation after X-E1. X-E1 in its turn is the same as X-Pro1, except X-E1 is smaller, has hybrid viewfinder replaced with higher-resolution electronic-only one, added external microphone/shutter release control connector, and some other minor differences.The rest of the differences are the same as between X-E1 and X-E2 -- X-E2 has faster processor, new sensor with faster autofocus (built-in phase detection sensors as opposed to contrast detection only in X-Pro1 and X-E1) and 14-bit color depth, split image focus view and other firmware improvements. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x-e2/ has more complete list. X-E2 is the next generation after X-E1. X-E1 in its turn is the same as X-Pro1, except X-E1 is smaller, has hybrid viewfinder replaced with higher-resolution electronic-only one, added external microphone/shutter release control connector, and some other minor differences.The rest of the differences are the same as between X-E1 and X-E2 -- X-E2 has faster processor, new sensor with faster autofocus (built-in phase detection sensors as opposed to contrast detection only in X-Pro1 and X-E1) and 14-bit color depth, split image focus view and other firmware improvements.... » Read More X-E2 is the next generation after X-E1. X-E1 in its turn is the same as X-Pro1, except X-E1 is smaller, has hybrid viewfinder replaced with higher-resolution electronic-only one, added external microphone/shutter release control connector, and some other minor differences.The rest of the differences are the same as between X-E1 and X-E2 -- X-E2 has faster processor, new sensor with faster autofocus (built-in phase detection sensors as opposed to contrast detection only in X-Pro1 and X-E1) and 14-bit color depth, split image focus view and other firmware improvements. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x-e2/ has more complete list. « Show Less
325402
I just called the manufacturer and they said that both units are identical with the exception of the lid. The SE represents Special Edition (SE) design. Same features and specifications.
1114565
I have the blue one and I don't see any difference except the padding color.
280436
I own both, and as others have said, the differences are mainly aesthetic. There are a few functional changes though. Aluminum skin, flush mount two cell battery, revised touchpad with single rocker style button, downgraded speakers (barely), and rearranged ports (IMO for the better).Battery life and screen brightness are definitely better on the 1000H, but I think the (slightly) smaller footprint, lighter weight, thinner profile, better mouse and non-print magnet lid more than cover the advantages of the 1000H. The battery life is more than adequate (3 to 3.5 hours).
1611809
The main difference is the finder. While the X-E2 only has a digital image finder, the X-Pro1 has a digital finder and an optical finder, that you switch with your index right hand finger on a level at the rigth side of the lens
1957466
You should more research. I think the G2 iis slightly larger phone. It would tell you in the spec section.
591362
Looks like they are either the same, or very similar. It is big and heavy (the Aura HD is no lightweight either), so together the package becomes quite unwieldy. I have this, but don't use it.
570880
I believe the mouse is easier to navigate. It also serves as a mouse so you do not have dual equipment.