is it better then ato?
1243863
It is an ATO, but doesn't involve floats. Comes with a pump and everything needed for an ATO device
1243864
I have had no problems with this device. It is a ato, has a pump to bring water to replace evaporated water. You must make sure the glass is clear. The one thing I had a problem with is the frame on tp of my aquarium wouldn't let it fill it to where I wanted it to so I trimmed it to where it would.
1243865
Way better. My ATO died in 2 years and in addition the sensor is much better design. I love it...
1243866
This is the only one I've owned by it only lasted 6 months and he manufacturer said that if you supplement calcium you void the warranty. I'm looking for something else now.
1243867
Power cord didn't work and company said I had to pay to get a new one several weeks after I ordered it. Terrible customer service. Would not recommend!
1243868
I've had no problems with the unit.. I feel it works tremendously.I have a 200 gallon fish tank. with this unit I have no problems going on vacation for a week.I use a 20 gallon freshwater tub to replenish the evaporation.
346945
130mg is better. It has a seven year exp date instead of 5 year for the 65mg tablet. Plus, it's actually cheaper per tablet.
1239785
The OTC Version is only 27 mg vs the prescription 40 mg. It is working for me just as well as the 40 did so it is worth a try.
372218
roc is ok, but i have been using this 2.5% for a little over a month and like it better. also it is cheaper.
612443
I believe that ATT has the same protocols as the Snapfon. However, the best thing to do is call the Snapfon people on their toll free number and ask them for a definitive answer. I've talked to them in the past and they are happy to help consumers with their questions.
1840680
No, there are better head phones out there. Audio Technica's ATH-M50 have better sound quality for about the same price as the Aviators. I own both. The Aviators will leak sound and do not block out much sound at all, however they have nice sound quality and are very light and comfortable. If you like being unique and stylish these headphones would be great for you, but if you would rather have good sound quality there are much better headphones out there. Obviously the higher the price will usually give you a better product. Whatever suits you sound or style. Hope this helps ;D
1210274
Greg,You seem like the real resident expert. I've really appreciated your reviews.I'm looking at buying two pair for my grandkids, their father and I to play with. I see I can get the LTTO version on Ebay for about the same as the neer LTX. Can you tell me which you prefer (or which is better)?Thanks,Barry
578244
Hi, Hunter, I'm assuming we're talking about the ANC off situation.The overall SQ, UE 6000 is better than ATH-M50S in my opinion. The bass is actually slightly emphasized, but it's tighter and deeper compares with M50S. It's spacious and has clearer soundstage to me.By the way, it is surprisingly comfortable for long session listening. For the price on Amazon right now, I'll say it's a great timing to buy UE 6000.
1736950
I've used the AT Pro since September 2013..I've used it on the beaches here in Oahu and found all kinds of stuff.(pull tabs, bottle caps, coins, nails, fishing hooks and weights etc.) It's pretty simple to use once you've viewed the dvd a couple of times. I have not found any gold rings yet, but I did find a Gold earring post. I've been reading and comparing detectors since owning the AT Pro and my opinion, the Garrett ATX sounds like a superior detector and it can be used in salt and fresh water. It also is excellent for nugget detecting. See Youtube Garrett ATX versus the Minelab 2000.... Garrett is 1/2 the price....well just watch and you be the judge. I've used the AT Pro since September 2013..I've used it on the beaches here in Oahu and found all kinds of stuff.(pull tabs, bottle caps, coins, nails, fishing hooks and weights etc.) It's pretty simple to use once you've viewed the dvd a couple of times. I have not found any gold rings yet, but I did find a Gold earring post. I've been reading and comparing detectors since owning the AT Pro and my opinion, the Garrett ATX sounds like a superior detector and it can be used in salt and fresh water. It also is excellent for nugget detecting. See Youtube Garrett ATX versus the Minelab 2000....... » Read More I've used the AT Pro since September 2013..I've used it on the beaches here in Oahu and found all kinds of stuff.(pull tabs, bottle caps, coins, nails, fishing hooks and weights etc.) It's pretty simple to use once you've viewed the dvd a couple of times. I have not found any gold rings yet, but I did find a Gold earring post. I've been reading and comparing detectors since owning the AT Pro and my opinion, the Garrett ATX sounds like a superior detector and it can be used in salt and fresh water. It also is excellent for nugget detecting. See Youtube Garrett ATX versus the Minelab 2000.... Garrett is 1/2 the price....well just watch and you be the judge. « Show Less
623708
It is not any better, they are both excellent products. Give them both a try is my recommendation.
1851858
Depends on your needs, but GXL-Next has an additional feature of silver testing, so at the same price you are getting more functionality. Both are great testers, but I would go for Tri Electronics one for more functionality at the same price. Tri Electronics is also better at customer support IMHO.
31296
I don't know the answer to this question, but I used both an Ergo and the BBII and I chucked my Ergo once I tried the BBII. IMO it's worlds better. See my review for why.
322
Not officially, but if you're really interested in strength I'd highly recommend the Stealth PBO. It's far, far stronger, and also much smoother. It's maybe $150 more, and well worth it.
912700
I-cybie, is 1,000 times better but the AIBO...(my little astro, runs for about 400$-1,000$ (thats only the RES-210 moudls)are 1 million times better Tecno is a tiny bit better than poo chi! ) Get i-cybie, its a toy, not like AIBO, but better. Don't waist your money. Go on u tube and watch both...you will c. Also...a lot of AIBO owners have i-cybies.
1121011
This website answers your question + more better than I ever could...http://nzmanukanatural.com/blog/difference-between-umf-active-mgo/
579299
So far I can just say that these two products are both good at performance. But compare the expense for the future maintance , IQ air is more expensive than Blue air. I'm still observing the long term performance now.
1850126
I like the advance better. The smell and the strength of the cleaner is better. I will order the advanced stain one from now on.