Could a lighter jacket or sweater be worn underneath???
105869
Sure. I bought my jacket a little bigger than normal just for that purpose.
1911677
Unless style has changed from last winter, no. But others have put their harnesses OVER the jacket. I really love this jacket for my dog, Bailey- so much so I plan on buying another for this winter season- last year was VERY harsh in Northern Indiana- The only bad thing I would say is that with constant use, the reflective "tape" wears off the back. But very durable considering the walks we take!
915057
You can if you'd like to. I wear mine over my workout capris/pants if they go past my knees and just pull the extra fabric out of the bottom of the knee sleeves. But wearing them under is ok too just makes it more bulky in my opinion under your clothes. I think it slips less too on top of my pants etc.
1497814
Highly unlikely. The jacket would have to be very thin and folded very tightly.
1134854
Not at all--I usually wear either a medium or large in a coat, and ordered a large based on reviews. It is big enough to wear a jacket or sweatshirt or sweater underneath with plenty of room. I am not big chested so that may be a factor also.
888198
You would still need a jacket. If you sit close you will feel warmth, but not really a lot of heat.
724600
The jacket is lined with a thin reflective material to give it warmth. It is fitted. I wear a medium and it is a snug fit. No room for extra clothing underneath.
281009
Don't see why not. Definitely a less "feminine" jacket, more rugged, but also more form-fitting.
1355783
Medium! Layering it is not a good idea as it can start to get cakey- good luck
700985
Go extra large if you want to put anything underneath. Remember the jacket already has armor in it.
19319
No you would definitely have to wear some long johns underneath to stay warm. They are comfortable but under 30 degrees you will be cold if outside for anytime.
1946809
You could but there would be a lot of material to tuck under...it may be that it would be too bulky underneath or need to be cut...
1458668
Not unless the shirt is very large and untucked. The pouch on the side hangs down close to the beltline and would be very uncomfortable under a tucked in shirt. Think jacket rather than shirt.
1957214
Definitely under a jacket, I once wore it to a formal occasion under my suit jacket and nobody noticed. If anything I had a couple people mention that I looked a bit taller.
854640
Yes..it's more of a full cut jacket. Check out the review on outdoorgearlab.
1295798
I found it to be a tight fit, so I wouldn't be able to put extra clothes underneath. It was a good wind breaker, so it would depend on your jacket.
222578
There is a built-in head net. It zips to the jacket at the collar. Your face/head/neck are all protected. It's big enough to wear a hat underneath.