Any suggestions for a compact tripod for this scope? If I am hiking with a 5lb scope and a camera, I need a lighter yet sturdy tripod. Can be short.
1255789
I am using a Mefoto Road trip in carbon fiber. It is light and really compact. There is a smaller version and a larger version available from them also.
1255790
I have a Silk compact which does the job but it is a table-top very short item (about a foot high max).
658112
Bildio, Do u have a tripod for those spotting scopes? Give me more details on the spotting scope's dimensions so that i can help you accurately.
940468
I've had a 5D2 with 70-300 zoom in a LowePro Toploader attached to 'em hanging off the straps on my backpack and it seemed to be fine. But I'd recommend contacting the company (Tamrac) and asking if they have a weight limit, I'm assuming they will for liability sake.
1204774
It's called an Xit XT50TRS. Fully extended it is barely above 4 ft tall. Somewhat flimsy but extremely lightweight if you had to carry it to the back country. Otherwise, you would prefer a real tripod. There is a YouTube flick on it if you want to look at it and get an opinion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQt418Ms_F4
1136604
I personally would not trust a tripod this flimsy with a DSLR. The monopod does not have a head either. I returned the kit immediately after opening. I would also recommend seeing how much weight a monopod/tripod head is rated for. I purchased a head that would hold up to 11 pounds, in case I'm using a long lens. I'd rather the equipment be a little on the stout side, holding my camera. Best of luck in your shopping. Amazon has been great.
2061394
I would second the first response ... I have a 501 and have used it on this tripod to digiscope with a Vortex Spotting Scope and Nikon 1. Weight of the 501 head, plate, scope and camera is about the limit. Being about to balance the system with the 501 sliding plate helps but a little wind can start vibrations. I do hang a weight from the hook as well. I purchased this tripod primarily for macro work that takes advantage of the horizontal center post positions so the scope/501 combination was returned to a heavier tripod.
1091188
I have a Hawk spotting scope that is 19" long & weighs 4.5 lbs. Is this tripod sturdy enough to hold this scope steady?
1820314
Tripod is fine. Monopod you're risking shaky footage.Image is incomparable, but I use the 24-105 IS if I have to do handheld or monopod work.
1162810
Manfrotto (formerly Bogen) makes the best tripods. The specifics will depend on the use; for example, if you are birding, weight will matter more than if you are stargazing because you'll have to carry it a lot. All things being equal, get the most solid tripod you can afford. For a scope at this price point, spend as much or more on the tripod as you did on the scope. A great scope that shakes is worse than the naked eye. You can reuse your awesome tripod for photo, video, your next scope, etc.
2255595
I don't know how much a spotting scope weighs, but it can hold a point-and-shoot digital camera acceptably. It could possibly tip over if the scope is too long as the tripod isn't that big, but the legs should be stiff enough to not give under weight if it isn't too much more than a point-and-shoot.
792998
It shall be pretty good for the C5 spotting scope. Anything not too huge and heavy and anything for terrestrial use would be the perfect candidate for this tripod.
1931283
This is a super lightweight tripod and is good for a small compact camera. Anything heavier than a small compact camera is questionable, as far as stability goes.
791367
I use this scope primarily for observing the sun (with solar filter of course) and also for viewing gun targets from a distance....if you are using the scope for viewing in low light the 100mm is definitely worth it....it is not that heavy....and a regular camera tripod supports it easily....I am quite happy with the performance of the scope....Jim
1273540
Any standard tripod will work but a sturdy one is preferred because of the lens size and weight of the camera. If you buy a light weight tripod you will just have to support the weight a little more and it will be harder to take low light or long exposure shots
721501
I mounted a bridge camera using the supplied 1/4" adapter. That worked fine. But as some of the other questions have alluded to, the tripod is a little bit shaky. It is very light weight.
378846
For portability I like the flexible Gorillapod which can wrap around poles or tree branches. For on-the-floor tripods look for one the best height for you. They come in a variety of lengths and if you are very tall the 61" will be uncomfortable and/or annoying for long shooting sessions.
954524
This is the tripod that I use with this scope and it's very sturdy: Bushnell Advanced TripodIt's a little heavy and the legs aren't quick release, but is definitely stable enough to take advantage of the wonderful optics of the scope. I use this all the time while birding in grassland areas and at the shore. Not great for hiking with as it is heavy.