Which vision should I get for green cheek conure a l02 or the l12 please help
1243684
The L02 and L12 are the same size in terms of dimensions. The only difference is the bar spacing and wire diameter. L02 has Horizontal wire: 1.6 mm (0.06"), Vertical wire: 2.6 mm (0.10"), Wire spacing (center to center): 12.3 mm (0.48"). L12 has Horizontal wire: 2.6 mm (0.10"), Vertical wire: 3.0 mm (0.11"), Wire spacing (center to center): 20.5 mm (0.81").
1243685
I agree with C. Niewind. The bigger one L12. I have 3 lovebirds in mine. Had 4. Its a great cage. Easy to clean. I easily put it in the bathtub to give my guys a shower. They love it.
1243686
Well, I'm not sure. Actually I didn't keep this cage (although it was VERY nice) becuase it didn't have a slide-out tray for cleaning.......
1243687
defiantly the l12. bigger is almost always better. sometimes a bird might be at first uncomfortable in a large cage if they had a very small one before, but they quickly enjoy the new space. the beauty with this one is, that you can make it a L02 by not setting up the second "height section". I personally own three of them and would not trade them for anything else. you will see what I mean with the "second height extension" when you unpack it .
1243688
I personally think the l12 would be good for your conure because it has so much space to climb and hang lots of toys.
1893809
Thank you for your question, but the choice denpends on enviroment of hunting, if you hunt on a wide, clear and flat field like a plain, or argricultural fields, the 10x50 is slightly better, but in other enviroments, the 7x50 is the best choice, it brings brighter images than 10x50, this will help hunter find out the preys easily in the dust or dawn, it ussually gives wider field of view, that will help tracking the preys better, the manification is enough to use in most of hunting trip Best regard
2132023
Go for the one that has the most contrast. It will give you a better and better sight picture.
1625584
The difference is 1mm wider on the wide end and doesn't have as wide of a zoom range (8mm less on the long end). In exchange for a very limited zoom range, you get 1 stop more light to your sensor.I have the 11-16mm and wouldn't trade it for the 12-24 unless I needed more overlap with my other lenses. As it is right now, I have nice coverage from 11-200 with only small gaps (16-17mm and 55-70mm) and a constant f/2.8 or better.
2151078
I haven't compared the two but here in New England, where long range shots are rare, the 2-3 is more practical and the 12 is not useful. I've used the 9x only once to see antlers and even then, there was so much brush and limbs in the way that the magnification was really no help. I've never hunt out west but I could imagine the 4-12 might be more appropriate there.
1469254
I use the 3 and higher for imaging Planets, thet 2X can be used for doubling the power at the eyepiece. The 127 eq is a great scope you should have lots of fun. I had a C5 at one time loved it.
403189
The smaller loupe is 10X. Don't think it would be suitable for one with Macular Degeneration if reading very much.
107885
Go higher! under water there is less visibility, so anything that gives you the edge, I would go for... Anyway there is some eye adjustment at any point and at that level half a Dioptric is almost negligible (my unprofessional opinion)
1243290
I typically carry both, but the 10's are my primary pair. I use the 15's as a stand-in for a scope (which I don't like to carry) and the 10's for regular birding. The 15s have too narrow a field of view for normal land birding. The 12's are better than the 10's in tropical places with high forest canopy or other areas where you are frequently looking at birds are a fair distance. In normal (for me) North American birding the 10's are great. THe 10's are also very good for pelagic birding, where the 12s and 15s are nearly useless.
1150128
Optically both are very very good. Advantages of 135 f2 is a shorter focal length and 1-stop of light. Advantages of 200 f2.8 is the cheaper price. See which focal length you use the most and decide based on that.
1893807
Thank you for your question, but the choice denpends on enviroment of hunting, if you hunt on a wide, clear and flat field like a plain, or argricultural fields, the 10x50 is slightly better, but in other enviroments, the 7x50 is the best choice, it brings brighter images than 10x50, this will help hunter find out the preys easily in the dust or dawn, it ussually gives wider field of view, that will help tracking the preys better, the manification is enough to use in most of hunting tripBest regard
2141148
It depends on the application, the D2s are better in terms of lumens and total light. But you can not get the D2 in spot, only driving pattern for long distance. I have 2 pairs (4 lights) of Dually (D1)spots and the distance between the spots and the D2 driving beam is very noticeable. You can also get 2 pairs of Duallys (D1) for the price of 1 pair of D2s. So you could mix beam patterns to match your use for the lights. Hope this helps!
1999913
Yes, Andrea , the green cheek conure will do just fine in this cage. I would buy additional perches for him/her to roast on. The type that have a wingnut and washer on one end. This way you are not criss crossing perches all over the cage.
2132020
Upon recommendation from other shooter friends, I went with the green and am very happy with it. Excellent sight picture withnatural daylight-not necessarily great in indoor low light but still like it better than stock (black). For me the green is much more visible than red(I have guns with both).
2080587
I have an eclectus parrot, which is much larger than your conure and he does fine. He travels outside with me everywhere in it. Not sure if you can get yours out when you reach your destination but for size, it would work well.
1999914
I have cockatiels, and I am thinking the green cheek conure is larger than mine. It is good spacing I think for your bird.
641010
Typical binocular sizes for birding are around 8x40, 8x25, 7x35, and 8x30. Bigger 2nd number = more light but heavierer. Models up from this that rare really great but still not to expensive would be the Nikon Acculon 7x35 (wide view), LL.Bean/Bushnell "Discovery" 8x25(small but sharp), and the Leupold Yosemite 8x30(very sharp and clear). This 8x21 is OK but it needs a bright target and it's not super sharp. Still, 8x21 is easy to carry around in pocket or purse. I use the Discovery a lot...it's a compromise size and super-sharp.