what is the "F Pro" & does it make a difference? I keep a UV Haze filter on all my lenses but want to replace the cheaper ones with better filters.
1273210
Not sure what the F Pro badge adds, but can say that I ordered another B&W; at the same time I ordered this one, both my first time with B&W;, and will not buy another filter other than B&W; in the future- they are actually much better quality than the others I have used.
1273211
Yes it really does. Try renting them first from a local shop and see for your self. It's great for landscapes.
1273212
I tried to send you an example picture, not sure you got it. If not, please send an email and I will bounce you a picture or two using this filter. Made a difference this weekend.
1273213
I belive it's best to have the best filters on my lens that I can afford. It will save the lens if it is dropped and can be repaird. Which has happened to me
1607624
As trivial as it may seem, don't skimp on a filter. You have a nice camera, so get a MULTI-COATED filter from someone like B&W, Heliopan, or Hoya. The multi-coatings reduce flare and reflections, just like your multi-coated Nikon lens -- again, don't skimp, it'll truly reduce the quality of your photo's especially in sunlight. The size of the filter should be imprinted on the lens, and yes, it's 67mm. A good filter is somewhere in the $50 neighborhood.
1933599
B&H; photo recommends a 58MM haze filter on their Fuji mirrorless cameras with 18-55 filter. If you have questions look up their website, their online staff is very knowledgeable. In my experience the B+W filters are better made (and more expensive). The threading for lenses is universal so you could go with Hoya or others
1794471
Without it being available yet it's hard to say just what exactly will be different quality wise. The new one will improve bokeh out of focus highlights at a price though. You will lose T-Stops (light transmission) For example 1.2 might give you the same light as f1.8-2. This is because the filter is a type of Neutral Density filter. For me I shoot low light and having that extra stop is important. The trade off combined with price just doesn't work. So what's more important to you? Bokeh quality or low light shooting? The 56mm is a fantastic lens in either version. Highly recommended! Without it being available yet it's hard to say just what exactly will be different quality wise. The new one will improve bokeh out of focus highlights at a price though. You will lose T-Stops (light transmission) For example 1.2 might give you the same light as f1.8-2. This is because the filter is a type of Neutral Density filter. For me I shoot low light and having that extra stop is important. The trade off combined with price just doesn't work. So what's more important to you? Bokeh quality or low light shooting? The 56mm is a fantastic lens... » Read More Without it being available yet it's hard to say just what exactly will be different quality wise. The new one will improve bokeh out of focus highlights at a price though. You will lose T-Stops (light transmission) For example 1.2 might give you the same light as f1.8-2. This is because the filter is a type of Neutral Density filter. For me I shoot low light and having that extra stop is important. The trade off combined with price just doesn't work. So what's more important to you? Bokeh quality or low light shooting? The 56mm is a fantastic lens in either version. Highly recommended! « Show Less
1398053
On a business trip to NY my husband stopped in at B&H; Photo to find a UV filter for the SX20 IS. They tried both 58mm and 52mm in all brands and nothing fit. I found online an adapter from Lensmate (http://lensmateonline.com/newsite/SX10SX1.html). Great discussion on attaching filters. Has anyone purchased this and what's your recommendation.
1789716
My primary reason for using this UV filter is to shield the front lens element from dirt, grime, and fingerprints. The quality of the filter is perfectly adequate and does not affect my imagess at all. Photographers seem to be split down the middle whether one should or should not always use a UV filter but since I see absolutely no difference in my photos both with and without the filter, it seems both prudent and convenient to use it. I'd rather subject the filter than the lens to the inevitable cleanings. especially in the field.
1673903
Yup the 25mm f/1.4 lens uses 46mm filters. As the previous three answers said. I just looked at the Amazon page for this lens and I was surprised to see that this information does not appear on that page. In the "what other people bought..." section it does show a 46mm UV haze filter, but really for a lens that does take filters the technical info should give the filter size it takes.
630850
I use a thin uv filter mainly for protection of the front element. It works fine! This is a great lens and I think you will enjoy it! Take care, Doc
859175
Step up rings create two potential problems, although they do save money. First, the lens cap might not fit and second there is the potential of flare, etc with the filter being somewhat further away from the lens. I have always invested the money for a UV filter for each lens I have. Best way to protect an expensive len.
278820
Good question...I have a simple answer.......buy the best filters you can afford. IMHO, I only buy Nikon filters for my Nikkor lenses. You can't go wrong with any of the top brand filters as previously mentioned.. Be sure to check that the filters mounting ring is thin enough (especially on any wide angle lens) so it won't cause the filter to fringe.
727742
They are for completely different purposes. UV filter is more transparent; polarizer--among many other things--darkens skies and removes reflections.
46363
thank you for your recommendations. i've bought the hoya shmc filters for my lenses. they're great.do you have the sigma 50mm f1.4 lens? if yes, what are you shooting? do you flickr?thanks again.
357773
UV(C) passes much more ultraviolet light than UV(0) filters. Additionally, the Pro 1 coating is a little more transparent and easier to clean. Finally, the Pro1 rim is higher quality. See hoya's website below: http://www.hoyafilter.com/hoya/products/generalfilters/uvcslimframe/
994207
The 2 lenses are good, but the main difference is on how sensitive the lens is. In the one i bought, it's lowest f-stop is 4. you need more light for avoiding grain. The one you are referring to works better in a low light condition (f 2.8).
502285
I erroniouslly purchased the non coated version for my wife. She is a sunrise/sunset photographer. The non coated version allowed significant lense flare when pointed into the sun. While on vacation, we met another photographer who had the coated UVA filter. She had the same problem we did, only bought the MRC and hasn't had a problem since. I have since purchased a B+W UVA MRC filter for her, among other stupidly expensive filters, but I have wasted enough money buying items "on the cheap" for her hobby to know that you get what you pay for. I buy B+W exclusively for her 5D Mk ii and L series lenses.
558032
Probably a reasonable thing to do use a UV filter for haze. With the G10 (like most point and shoots without a lens thread) you will require an extension tube to fit onto the bayonet fitting surrounding the lens. I intend to include a PL filter which will greatly enhance sky and water. In order to replace the camera in its case this fitting will have to be removed each time.I didn't write this - someone else did under my name. Perhaps the whole discussion business is a sham to sell more gear!
1026379
There are many answers to this question. The type of filter depends of the type of photography you do.For myself, I take many pictures near water so I carry polarizing filters for most of my lenses - to cancel reflections and darken the sky. I also use UV filters on my lenses most of the time for protection and to improve contrast.