Harmony 676 vs 880: What are the other advantages the 880 has over the 676 other than the color display ?
1238902
Neither of the Logitech remotes use bluetooth. There is a device for $20 that converts the bluetooth to IR for the PS3. The review previously saying it won't work with PVR/DVR is also incorrect. The 676 and 880 are both programmed the same way, therefore any devices that work on the 880 will work on the 676. Not trying to be judgemental, but there is misinformation in your post.
1069900
Yes, the new 6 and 7 series (coming out in March) has an improved less reflective screen, improved 120hz automotion, a faster 4ms lcd panel, higher 30,000:1 contrast ratio and thumbwheel remote. Was going to make the move right now on the LNT5271 (and a matching stand) but Amazon's recent price increase to $2799 is over $300 more now than other very highly rated online suppliers (including shipping too), so I'll wait it out and might even just get the new 6 series. Even my local Best Buy retail store (who is usually high priced) is now at $2699 with their 10% off which is even less than the new Amazon price. I love Amazon but their recent huge price increase is a little too insane for my pocketbook. Yes, the new 6 and 7 series (coming out in March) has an improved less reflective screen, improved 120hz automotion, a faster 4ms lcd panel, higher 30,000:1 contrast ratio and thumbwheel remote. Was going to make the move right now on the LNT5271 (and a matching stand) but Amazon's recent price increase to $2799 is over $300 more now than other very highly rated online suppliers (including shipping too), so I'll wait it out and might even just get the new 6 series. Even my local Best Buy retail store (who is usually high priced) is now at $2699 with their 10% off which is even less than the... » Read More Yes, the new 6 and 7 series (coming out in March) has an improved less reflective screen, improved 120hz automotion, a faster 4ms lcd panel, higher 30,000:1 contrast ratio and thumbwheel remote. Was going to make the move right now on the LNT5271 (and a matching stand) but Amazon's recent price increase to $2799 is over $300 more now than other very highly rated online suppliers (including shipping too), so I'll wait it out and might even just get the new 6 series. Even my local Best Buy retail store (who is usually high priced) is now at $2699 with their 10% off which is even less than the new Amazon price. I love Amazon but their recent huge price increase is a little too insane for my pocketbook. « Show Less
102895
I believe the only difference is the ability to transmit 36-bit color(otherwise known as deep color) and at 1440p
628224
The ea9800 is brighter and gets slightly better color. It also handles motion slightly better too if you are very particular. You can see reviews off both sets at "televisions.reviewed.com". The differences will be too subtle to distinguish in normal viewing however but it provides more bragging rights for vidoephilles like me.
2004589
i have 2 older Harmony's (676). they work well with Uverse and i would have to believe the newer models do as well, so i can quite confidently say "YES"
305533
The wider screen provides a few niceties, such as it's a bit easier to input data because the ABC keyboard isn't as small, plus the wider screen allows for a QWERTY keyboard interface along with the ABC keyboard interface. If one uses it in 2D mode, the wider map screen may be helpful. For those who prefer to use the device in 3D mode (the way it appears in the pictures), a wider screen doesn't help much since the height of the two units are close to the same. Personally, I don't mind the smaller size at all (I owned the 260 as well as the 765), the text is the same size and found it a bit easier to slip the smaller screen model into shirt my pocket.
949733
The 636 also has the HDCP 2.2, so that's not it. The diff is that the 737 has THX certification and bit more power.
1565186
Thank you for your email to Hammacher Schlemmer. The 880 Roomba is quieter. faster ,cleans better, less maintenance , emptyies less often than the 780 model. I hope this information helps you. If you need further assistance please contact us. Thank you.
1128941
I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale. I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000... » Read More I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale. « Show Less
1117580
Well, I decided! I went with the Harmony 890, with the IR and RF capablilities. After one month, I am still happy with my purchase. The thing isn't flawless, but it does do a nice job. Biggest gripe is that you have to unplug the little RF to IR converter to change anything on the remote.
1661769
The 6733 has 3 modes and the 6962 has 5 modes. That's the difference. Both offer 31,000 brush strokes per minute. As for me, I use only 1 or 2 of the modes at best, usually only 1. Either of these models would be a great product it's up to you on the price.
1981325
As a mater of fact, I talked to the company today. You can find the comparison on the Sharp sight but there is more to it. First the Dynamic contrast is 15000:1 for the 92 and 10000:1 for the 64, making the 92 much better. The 92 came out Feb 07 while the 64 came out Aug 07. Sure the 64 is newer, but the 92 has the contrast. The 92 has another level of backlight (the ambilight function) kind of like a table light with a pull cord, full once more and get a brighter light. You get the picture. 92 has detachable speakers 64 does not. DVI-I conection (for a computer) on the 92 where the 64 has RGB. and lastly, all connections for the 92 are in back while 64 has some on the side. As I said, there is a comparison chart found on the Sharp site. I'll be buying the 92, sure it's about $700 more but it's worth it!
860338
Nope, that's the difference. Amazing anyone buys the TX-SR608. :) 1. VGA is largely obsolete; HDMI is now becoming standard on consumer PCs. 2. Sirius holds no interest to me. 3. THX is nice, but I don't have THX speakers which support the mandated 80hz crossovers (on all speakers) nor do I have a 7.1 setup (for the full THX effect)....it's just not worth it.
1028587
I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar output. Ease of use pays off every time you start the thing up. Hope this helps. I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar... » Read More I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar output. Ease of use pays off every time you start the thing up. Hope this helps. « Show Less
674974
What I noticed most was the text quality. With the VGA connection, text on the 906BW had a smudged, almost shadowed look. On DVI the shadows were gone so the text looked clean and clear.
661701
The 876 can achieve 140 watts plus per channel with 5 channels driven, something only high end receivers can do(it has a beefy amp section, it weighs 51 lbs!). The 806 falls below its 130 rating with 5 channels, but is still quite competitive in that category. They can both adjust the volume on the center channel, something most current receivers do.In real world, the difference in watts will not be noticed and it's pretty rare that a movie soundtrack will employ 5 channels at full volume. The 876 has superior video processing, but blu ray players and flat screens both could do that anyway. You'd be happy with the 806 in my opinion. The 876 can achieve 140 watts plus per channel with 5 channels driven, something only high end receivers can do(it has a beefy amp section, it weighs 51 lbs!). The 806 falls below its 130 rating with 5 channels, but is still quite competitive in that category. They can both adjust the volume on the center channel, something most current receivers do.In real world, the difference in watts will not be noticed and it's pretty rare that a movie soundtrack will employ 5 channels at full volume. The 876 has superior video processing, but blu ray players and flat screens both could do... » Read More The 876 can achieve 140 watts plus per channel with 5 channels driven, something only high end receivers can do(it has a beefy amp section, it weighs 51 lbs!). The 806 falls below its 130 rating with 5 channels, but is still quite competitive in that category. They can both adjust the volume on the center channel, something most current receivers do.In real world, the difference in watts will not be noticed and it's pretty rare that a movie soundtrack will employ 5 channels at full volume. The 876 has superior video processing, but blu ray players and flat screens both could do that anyway. You'd be happy with the 806 in my opinion. « Show Less
815987
Not sure about best. We have two that employees use with newish MacBook airs. Our choice was all about consistency of screen coloring display and usability in the future with other apple products. We're pleased. The screen is enormous.