anyone compared this with dt880 or x1?
1245127
the DT 880s are much more bass heavy whereas these MA900s sort of lack in bass, but the rest of the sound is cleaner. The sound stage is incredible on these MA900s and comfort is bar none the best. These are also the lightest headphones ever and you will forget you are wearing anything on your head. Although, in regards to their comfort, the padding on the ear cups are sort of stiff, especially when you compare them to the soft and plush DT 880 cushions, but overall, the MA900s are still more comfortable. I do wish they had the DT880's cushiony pads and then these MA900s would be the ultimate comfort machine. the DT 880s are much more bass heavy whereas these MA900s sort of lack in bass, but the rest of the sound is cleaner. The sound stage is incredible on these MA900s and comfort is bar none the best. These are also the lightest headphones ever and you will forget you are wearing anything on your head. Although, in regards to their comfort, the padding on the ear cups are sort of stiff, especially when you compare them to the soft and plush DT 880 cushions, but overall, the MA900s are still more comfortable. I do wish they had the DT880's cushiony pads and then these MA900s would be the... » Read More the DT 880s are much more bass heavy whereas these MA900s sort of lack in bass, but the rest of the sound is cleaner. The sound stage is incredible on these MA900s and comfort is bar none the best. These are also the lightest headphones ever and you will forget you are wearing anything on your head. Although, in regards to their comfort, the padding on the ear cups are sort of stiff, especially when you compare them to the soft and plush DT 880 cushions, but overall, the MA900s are still more comfortable. I do wish they had the DT880's cushiony pads and then these MA900s would be the ultimate comfort machine. « Show Less
1245128
Did not compare them with any of the above mentioned headphones but they definitely sound a lot more interesting than Q710.
1660814
From the comments I've seen, it looks like the Kenwood DNX891HD has gotten rave reviews and scant criticism. Its a completely different OS. The software was written by a different party than the DNN991HD. I haven't sprung for the 891 since I already have the 991. If the prices come down significantly, then I will probably make that swap.
1358778
From trying both out, MA900 has less bass, but still punchy when needed. I'm not a fan of heavy bass and found MA900 bass more to my likings. MA900 doesn't stand out in terms of treble, but it's there and gets the job done. I can listen to MA900 for hours if I wanted to. I'd say X1 is great too, in terms of performance, I'd say both are about neck and neck with different sound signature. If you want less bass with mellow treble, I'd go with the MA900 for sure. More comfy too, in my opinion.
1645500
I don't know how it compares with the DT-400. I mostly listen to Public Radio, so the low end of the spectrum, and find the reception excellent. But if you get the 400 and like it better, let me know.
1643159
This model seems to have better sound response and seems to be more eficient. I have it as the front speakers in my living and the rc80i as the surround and it's a good combination. In my opinion. Hope this helps!!
2023704
The 1.4x will work better than the doubler, but my gut feeling is that the 1DX works better with such a setup than a 1Div, 1Diii, and 5D.
2052069
It depends on your priority. If you care more about music experience than the latest movie surround sound than it's worth it. For me, I wouldn't trade it for the x4000.
774527
I use the E-12 with this without exception. The Mont Blanc gives the sound an added boost both in volume and depth of sound. While the X3 has 550 mW and sound great as a stand alone, the E-12 has 850 mW so you are much farther away from clipping.
2120204
Roland A800 pro is absolutely better, no doubt about. Incomparable with any other
1395533
M100 is the latest but you cant find any short of difference. LP is best if you are not audiophile.
1054608
I've not owned the x-100 but the x-t1 is supposed to be lots faster ....Look in dpreview.com
2234337
If you are into listening to those, I would suggest Philips Fidelio X1. I've got both and when I compared them, I would think Fidelio X1 is more suited for your genre of music.
115864
I have dt990 250ohm, and UDAC2 works just fine. I've never tried dt770, but I think it's similar. I only have to turn the volume half way and it sounds great to me. I'm not a audiophile, but... just my two cents.
2175461
Both are great headphones. Everyone's description is pretty head-on from what I've read. I remember buying the HD280's at target on clearance- I opened them in the car out of excitement. They had REALLY TIGHT bass. The PX100 is more sloppy, but it's a really fun headphone unlike the PX100. I enjoyed it alot for most of my music (Electronica, Rap, Metal, Trance). The bass really hits on the 280's.
647862
I use both and sub-mix from my large mixer into the T1 in my studio. The T1 is more than a mixer and has great effects and a DAW connection via USB. It also fits easily in my gig bag and gets used more because it's all I need for a smaller gig.
1112558
PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price; PEN cons: smaller sensor... others? X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor; X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available. Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it: * is a dust trap, * prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare), * delays startup time, and * needlessly consumes battery power. That said, I still favor the X1. I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4, after having had many LUMIX models. Available light performance should be great. I will tell you if I'm happy later.
1789640
I've had no issues with audio crackles on x1, I texted my buddy as well and he reports no issues either, with both comfort and audio. If you got other questions go ahead and ill pop back and do my best in detail :)