Differencr between LNT4061F and LNT4065F? Whats the difference? (besides the price and model name)
1243590
3) The 4065F has side speakers while the 4061F has them on the bottom.(and reviews posted say bottom speakers on the 4061F are not near as good as the 4065F)
1243591
To the best of my knowledge there are only two differences:1) The 4065F has a glass screen while the 4061F has the standard matte LCD screen.2) The 4065F has a 15,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio (possibly due to #1 above) while the 4061F has a 10,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio.One thing you can do is check the Samsung USA website and view the user manual. You'll see it's the same user manual for both the xx61 series and the xx65 series. And if you flip through it you won't find many features that are available for one series vs. the other.
1243592
The 10 bit conversion also helps speed up processing of HD content, thus less/no ghosting during fast moving scenes and finer gradiations of black in dark scenes.
1243593
See the CNET review of the 46" version of this TV for a discussion of the differences between the xx61 and xx65:http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-and-plasma/samsung-ln-t4661f/4505-6482_7-32385769.html
1243594
Color gamut and contrast ratio are actually about the same level of importance. You want both to be very good. They're also somewhat interrelated.Also, static contrast ratio is more important than dynamic contrast ratio (it's pretty easy to increase dynamic contrast ratio without improving actual picture quality one iota - just completely turn the backlight off when the screen goes black), and the difference between the 61 and the 65 isn't very significant in that regard.
1243595
Also the 4065F has 10 bit conversion compared to the 8 bit processing in the 4061F. I believe this means that up conversion from lower resolution sources is superior...less grainy with better color.
1243596
does contrast ratio make a lot of difference? I'm also debating btwn 4061 and 4065.
1243597
As Brian M. states, contrast ratio is extremely important for picture quality. But the difference between the two sets that I listed above is in the _dynamic_ contrast ratio. Most people turn off the features that pump up the dynamic contrast ratio in order to get a better picture. What you want to compare is the _native_ contrast ratio for both sets, and I don't know what those values are. You may want to try avsforum.com or a similar site; I doubt native contrast ratio is available on Samsung's website.
833531
hello, no there is no Significant difference between those two. N660 TF will be only Slightly Cooler thats all.
1641985
I am sorry, I do not know the difference between the N4010 and N4110. You will need to contact the seller for this information.
777466
There appears to be no difference in their specs. They are listed together. I suggest you call them directly. Sorry I could be so little help
156169
To the best of my knowledge there are only two differences: 1) The 4065F has a glass screen while the 4061F has the standard matte LCD screen. 2) The 4065F has a 15,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio (possibly due to #1 above) while the 4061F has a 10,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio. One thing you can do is check the Samsung USA website and view the user manual. You'll see it's the same user manual for both the xx61 series and the xx65 series. And if you flip through it you won't find many features that are available for one series vs. the other.
250860
The 4665 was March 2007 and the 4061 was Feb 2007. I remember seeing March 2007 for the 4065 somewhere in my travels. Anyway, I just received the 4065 2 days ago - after 2 years of analysis paralysis. It is phenomenal! But let me say - I'm no audiophile or techie - just a regular person. I have not checked everything out yet - I can't get past marveling at the HD.
382553
Not sure what the difference is, but we got ours for @$500 on amazon and it has worked very well with no complaints here; much better deal than spending $1000s on a custom installed system!
1431419
As far as I can tell, there is no difference. All of the specs are identical - I thought maybe it was just an "updated" version. Hope this helps!
200692
There's a promotion going for the LN46B750. Amazon is currently selling it for $1,999.99. Input coupon code, "SAMTV300" and it drops to $1,699.99. I'm pissed because yesterday I picked up an LN46A860 from Crutchfield for $1,579.99 with 1% FW cashback. It already shipped, bleh. Specs wise, seems like everything is the same except that the LN46B750 introduces 240Hz motion and Internet@TV (Yahoo!, YouTube, Flickr, etc.). Also, the LN46B750 has a charcoal ToC while the LN46A860 has a dark blue one. Moreover, I haven't come across a review that details the performance of the 240Hz motion.
1991841
I do not know what is the difference between the two. Maybe one is a older verison (AQ-4000)? Hopefully, someone else can answer the question for you and me. ;-)
1430591
I believe it's just an older model number. I haven't found anything with any difference between the two of them.
2041124
First difference on who is going to fulfill the order. More expensive one is fulfilled by amazon the other is not. Second im willing to bet the model number diference is a direct reference to year models. Every year they change and tweak little things or sometimes major. Google the 2 numbers seperatly and you should get an answer. Anything else feel free to ask.
679062
I'm no expert in these matters, but I think we're dealing with a distinction without a difference on this point. Having received the unit, I can say that the box says it is a BD-FM59. There is a supplemental tag on the side of the box that says BD-F5900/BD-FM59 refurbished factory. The unit itself carries a compliance tag that says: BD-FM59, Model Code BD-FM592A. The instruction manual that came with it says it's for a BD-FM59C. What I think all this means is that the BD-F5900 is a model series, and the other designations are internal codes for something like date of production, place of assembly, or the like. In other words, it works like any other BD-F5900, regardless of the replacement of the last two 0's with a further number or letter code. I am quite pleased with mine, BTW.
1636717
Now shows L32F1120. Sounds like newer revs of the same TV. Wonder what the differences are. (?)
1396840
4661 Vs 4665: These two models are siblings. The 4661 has a matte finish whereas the 4665 has a "super clear panel" or gloss screen and a higher contrast ratio. The gloss finish is intended to bridge the gap in picture quality between LCDs and plasmas. Therefore, like plasmas, the 4665 will have some reflections but to me it is quite trivial compared to the richer colors you obtain from the 4665 compared to the 4661. Also, I think cnet, in its review, overstated the effect of the gloss coating and thereby needlessly scares those who are considering choosing between the 4661 and 4665. To further my point on why the gloss coat is better, note that the high end Samsung models, namely the 4671 and 4681, both have a gloss coat, and have obtained excellent reviews at cnet and amazon. If Samsung chooses to put a gloss coat on its best models, it surely means that Samsung and its customers know that the coating is better than one without it! I purchased the 4665 from Amazon for $1,549 on 12/23/2007. the price fluctuates all the time but Amazon will refund the difference if the price changes on its web site in 30 days
770713
I bought one. First of all, I'm not sure if all products coming from the same listing on Amazon will necessarily be exactly the same, since they may come from different sellers. The seller for mine was MLC Distribution. Second, I'm not sure how to tell without taking my laptop apart, since I've already installed it. However, System Profiler reports that the SERIAL NUMBER of mine is LT133DEVJK00. It does not display the model number. In any case, it has done great in my late 2007 white MacBook since I installed it in March.
686123
I'm not familiar with that particular model (The 4096), but the LNS series has been replaced by the LNT series. From what I have heard through extensive research, the LNS line had clouding on dark backgrounds, a problem shared with the Sony LCDs, since they use the same exact image panel.Keep in mind that this is a fantastic deal on the 4061 currently on Amazon. Go to a brick and mortar store and it will be several hundred dollars more. I think you are probably spot on with your assessment of the situation regarding the price. I just purchased the LNT-4061 today after extensive research, and here's hoping it's not too good to be true. I'm not familiar with that particular model (The 4096), but the LNS series has been replaced by the LNT series. From what I have heard through extensive research, the LNS line had clouding on dark backgrounds, a problem shared with the Sony LCDs, since they use the same exact image panel.Keep in mind that this is a fantastic deal on the 4061 currently on Amazon. Go to a brick and mortar store and it will be several hundred dollars more. I think you are probably spot on with your assessment of the situation regarding the price. I just purchased the LNT-4061 today... » Read More I'm not familiar with that particular model (The 4096), but the LNS series has been replaced by the LNT series. From what I have heard through extensive research, the LNS line had clouding on dark backgrounds, a problem shared with the Sony LCDs, since they use the same exact image panel.Keep in mind that this is a fantastic deal on the 4061 currently on Amazon. Go to a brick and mortar store and it will be several hundred dollars more. I think you are probably spot on with your assessment of the situation regarding the price. I just purchased the LNT-4061 today after extensive research, and here's hoping it's not too good to be true. « Show Less