What is the difference of this camera system vs the Uniden Guardian G455?
1274851
The UDW20055 system offers very basic features such as wireless monitoring. The video receiver or monitor has very basic navigation options, using the buttons/keys. The monitor does not have internal video recording. It does not offer any kind of smartphone features such as remote access or monitoring via smart apps or the internet. Unfortunately, this unit interfere with other wireless or WIFI devices (2.5 GHZ Freq.) such as wireless phones, routers, and smart TVs. This unit would be fine if you just want to monitor your baby while he/she sleeps. It also has video output capabilities, which enables you to connect it to an external monitor or TV set with a recording device connected to it. You can also connect the unit to your computer, download the uniden video recording software and keep you computer running (on) in order to record videos. The Uniden Guardian G455 and newer models offer many new features such as touch screen, remote access or monitoring via internet and smart phone technology using the uniden apps. It does not interfere with wireless devices which use 5 GHZ or higher frequencies. It comes with a cradle base for charging and connecting the unit to the internet. The monitor itself is portable and rechargeable and it supports internal recording via SD Memory Card. The unit also support up to four camera which is a standard feature of previous models. The cameras are small and can capture videos up to 400 feet during the day. At night time, the IR works just fine and you can recognize a face up to 20 feet due to limitations cause by the darkness. This unit is ideal for home security and surveillance. However, you cannot see the videos on a regular windows computer. You can read the memory card using a Linux base computer or device. Hope this review helps.
1274852
This unit can be monitored remotely via a wireless internet connection. The UDW20055 does not offer this feature.
1791317
If you go to cnet, they have a more detailed comparison between the two. I'll try a link here... http://www.cnet.com.au/camcorders/0,239035877,339272971,00.htm
1328181
Hi, in this link you can see a comparison of both models:http://www.samsung.com/ve/consumer/cameras-camcorders/smart-cameras/productcompare?prda=EC-DV150FBPWPA&prdb;=EC-DV300FBPRPABasically have the same features, the only difference I see is the physical design
1296630
A cool website for comparing cameras is http://snapsort.com/compare Check it out. You might find some answers there.
1438108
I don't think there is any difference, or any such camera. I ordered the D3 and received the D2 apparently. I hadn't noticed that until you asked. Some PT cameras pan around endlessly without having to reverse. This one does not. There is a blind spot in the rear where the camera mounts. There is no D3 listed on their website Loftek.com, but the D1 is without the IR lights.
321461
Amazon shipped the Quickcam pro for notebooks. Not the wecam C905! I checked now on my camera what is the P/N (the tag attached to the USB cord) and what logitech has on these. Well, found now that the Logitech Quickcam pro for notebooks p/n is 860-000108 (which is what I got when I bought from Amazon the presumable new C905. )According to Logitech site the Webcam C905 p/n is 860-000231!So these are not the same. Still what is the actual difference between these cameras.? They look the same...??best
1064892
I believe these both might be comparable. I had taken this as a gift and this was not as expensive as others. The friend to whom it was gifted is really impressed with the camera. however, the issue he has is the battery life. These cameras use AA alkaline cells the GE takes about 20-25 photographs with 2 cells. It would be better to buy the AA lithium ion batteries which will last longer. HTH. Thanks and Regards.
478927
It seems that yes - the only difference is the memory card size. My 16G version has G Sensor and GPS, for example.
2051966
They use the same image sensor with the ax100 recording capability of 4k. There is a $600 difference plus you are going to need bigger and faster memory cards and more hard drive space with longer rendering times and a 4k monitor to really see the difference. As a professional, I would buy the pro version of this camera (pxwx70) before I'd spend the extra on 4k. It's a personal decision but I wouldn't bother with 4k now unless you are viewing it in 4k. I think they're are other factors that affect image quality more than resolution at this point in the technology world. Like a OLED HD tv set has better quality image than a non OLED 4k tv. That's my 2 cents worth anyway. They use the same image sensor with the ax100 recording capability of 4k. There is a $600 difference plus you are going to need bigger and faster memory cards and more hard drive space with longer rendering times and a 4k monitor to really see the difference. As a professional, I would buy the pro version of this camera (pxwx70) before I'd spend the extra on 4k. It's a personal decision but I wouldn't bother with 4k now unless you are viewing it in 4k. I think they're are other factors that affect image quality more than resolution at this point in the technology world. Like a OLED HD tv... » Read More They use the same image sensor with the ax100 recording capability of 4k. There is a $600 difference plus you are going to need bigger and faster memory cards and more hard drive space with longer rendering times and a 4k monitor to really see the difference. As a professional, I would buy the pro version of this camera (pxwx70) before I'd spend the extra on 4k. It's a personal decision but I wouldn't bother with 4k now unless you are viewing it in 4k. I think they're are other factors that affect image quality more than resolution at this point in the technology world. Like a OLED HD tv set has better quality image than a non OLED 4k tv. That's my 2 cents worth anyway. « Show Less
1184096
The switch seems to handle the three POE ip cams i have installed just fine. "foscams" Which cameras are you going to use? I also have Blue IRIS insalled on a PC. Blue Iris does a decent job at managing the cameras, but i have noticed that performce is weak when trying to do continues recording from 3 cameras. Some of that may be the pc im using but i am unwilling to invest in a new computer for just the purpose of running the cameras. There is not a lot of documentation with the software and its not very intuitive. I have 4 total and it will work with a wide verity of cameras. I dont have any experience with NVR's. I have looked into them but they seem pretty pricy. If you have not bought any cameras or equipment yet, I would strongly point you in the direction of CCTV systems. You can easily get a system for the same cost of buying 4 POE cameras. I wish someone had told me this before i got started. You will still be required to pull the cable to cameras either way. I think the upside with CCTV would be that the dVR is doing all the recording continusly. They do a great "Superior" job at what they are designed to do. PC based systems are kind of shakey at this price point. In most cases you can record up to two weeks worth at a time, with several cameras with a DVR system and have alerts sent and motion triggers. I have seen the difference in between my setup and two different CCTV systems. One of them "lorex" and the second "swan" If I had it to do all over again i would go with CCTV. Id buy a 4 camera set with a dVR with room to expand up to 8 cameras. I started with one camera and now have four. Its good to have room to grow. Just FYI I have seen a 4 camera setup with 4, 700 lines of resolution cameras for less or close then what your going to spend on POE. One last note you will also be able to remote monitor with your smart phone or web browser just like using POE and Blue Iris. More info then you wanted I know, but just my 2 cents!
1103916
Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely whatever you use to edit/burn your video will encode the video upon output. So a bit more versatile but also a bit bulkier camera.Bryan Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely... » Read More Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely whatever you use to edit/burn your video will encode the video upon output. So a bit more versatile but also a bit bulkier camera.Bryan « Show Less
1923874
I decided not to get a Uniden precisely for that reason. Went with a panasonic instead. Pretty happy with it.
318940
If talking in terms of card space. The G1W has a bit rate of 12mbps The camera officially supports up to a 32GB Micro SD card witch will give you 6.1 hours of record time The camera un-officially supports some 64GB cards (through formatting with a PC program and not the camera) witch will give 12.1 hours of record time, but of course after 6 hours are up the camera will over write the oldest file with a new one on its own. If talking in terms of battery the battery on it's own will record for roughly 5 mins before needing to be plugged back in. Check DashCamTalk for more information on the G1W
2108404
Short answer is yes. According to the camera compatibility chart on the Uniden website, the Guardian 766 system works with the GC45, GC45W, GC43, and GC43W. I have GC45's on my Guardian 755 system and they work well.
1582853
I do not own this camera, but do have several of the TriVision NC-107W, NC-107WF, NC-306W, NC-316W, NC-326PW, and NC-336PW cameras. This camera appears to be an updated version of the NC-107WF camera. The NC-107WF camera has a built-in microphone to record sound. The recorded sound quality is decent if the subject being recorded is within roughly 15-20 feet of the camera. The product description for this camera states, "Full 30 fps H.264 compression video performance at 640 x 480 resolution with audio for reduced bandwidth and storage," so this camera does support audio recording. Unlike the outdoor TriVision cameras, this camera does not support two-way audio, where computer speakers may be connected to the camera so that a person in the camera's view is able to talk with someone monitoring the camera. If you intend to use this camera as a security camera, I suggest taking a look at other cameras that offer 1080P (1920x1080) resolution. A 640x480 resolution camera is fine to see that something happened, while a 1080P camera does a better job of identifying who did the thing that happened.
1490206
Some how the system changed what I had bought and what I was commenting on. I actually purchased from Amazon The Wansview model NCB541W Wireless night vision indoor camera. SO I am sorry that they got the item I bought wrong. WM
1312580
The S95 has a bigger sensor than the SX230, so that in itself is a big plus for the S95.I have owned the SX230 and wasn't too impressed with its white balance and high ISO photos in low light.