will this make the subject clear? and the background blurry? and if it is, is there any cheaper ones that do the same things?
1262995
The nifty fifty (50mm f1.8) will do the same at 100 bucks :) However, you will constrained to shoot with it in tighter/smaller spaces due to longer focal length.
1581339
I am not always steady with the camera, either. So far I have not had one that isn't crystal clear. I would recommend that you try it. It has very fast shutter speed.
669911
yes, at times the picture is a bit grainy. i am going to check out the manual. if i find a anything that helps i will let you know.
662926
I have not noticed any blurry images. As to switching issues, I haven't used it for very long but don't remember any and I go between 4 sources.
343607
Apparently not: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3651326#forum-post-53452388(It works but vignettes and image quality is poor)
250135
I'm having this issue, too. Camera seems to get confused and the whole frame becomes blurry rather than focusing on the one object. It takes several attempts to register what I'm trying to do, and then it's too late - opportunity has passed and subject has moved. Time to really study my manual I guess or maybe this is a shortcoming with this camera.
1728537
haven't played with it too much, I think it does what paint shop pro does but with better raw conversion thats what I bought it for working on raw files, for everything else i use paint shop sorry i couldn't be more helpful
1728535
Hi, it does help you remove blemish when you used the proper setting, it is difficult to fix a picture that is taking by a cell phone. With à regular camera everything is easy to do. I like using this software.
716449
I did not find an issue with blurring but I got air bubbles after a week (an apple genius did the install too).
222559
No it is just supposed to allow you to have a wider field of view. It looks fish eye-like. In my opinion it makes the images look blurry and actually reduces the quality.
259564
The ones I used (on envelopes) turned out to be translucent--not clear, so you could see the filmy background. Didn't look as good as I would have liked. you might try one on a glass...if you will have things in the glass, it might work well...
1571906
The short answer is no, but in my opinion that's a good thing since you have more control over the focus and apeture. It can be pretty unforgiving though, since it has such a shallow depth of field-- great for film, rough sometimes for stills.
742168
Sorry. I've only used it for still photos. Would probably work OK if you didn't have to do panning and thus change focus...unless you are more nimble than I am.
524081
Not at all. Pictures are just as clear as well. My sister does have AN APP which she uses as a camera and it does affect that but not sure why. If you use your regualr IPHONE camera you'll be fine.
1540600
It did change the clearness, but it all depends on what you are looking for. Mine works way better now.
244527
Caroline: I have only did slides (126), quality is not the greatest. Ok for saving purposes but, Would recommend better quality $$devise. (it matches the cost) It think it will scan any thing, place neg. for optimum view.frame determines what shows.
732740
Oh yes. You will notice the difference in a heartbeat. Forget photographic work... Even outlook and other desktop applications are washed out