What about photo prints, will it cut those?
1255462
Hi Debra: I have used this tool to cut out graphics printed on matte photo paper and it does just fine. No worries.
1359305
I've had no problems cutting photos. The arm extension allows you to cut larger photos evenly. I'd highly recommend this cutter, especially for the price.
1748487
Technically yes; reliably, no. This is a stack cutter. I bought a cheap Xacto craft cutter for cutting one or two sheets, photos etc.
1550735
My only experience with this product is with my Canon printer printing photographs on Canon Glossy Photo Paper. I'm sorry that I don't have the answer you are looking for...
2204439
I didn't purchase for photo printing, but I have printed a couple of photos and it was okay. If you are wanting a printer to print many photos, this is not the printer.
2175366
I'm not sure.....my son used this for a project in a college photography class. I asked him, he thinks maybe it won't affect the pictures - but, he's not sure.
1645439
It appears that it does although I am not using that feature. It will print photo's.
2141707
Like others said. not a photo printer. Fine for brochures. An inkjet will do a much better job for photos.One thing to keep in mind, printer settings default to 300dpi, this can be changed to a much higher resolutionwhen you print photos. (Still not as good as an inkjet)
489416
The printer will print on any paper that will draw through the printer. It is just expensive to use a photo printer as a utility printer.
1993074
Not very well. Slides and film are mounted into templates and pushed through the machine, with only 1" wide area exposed for the light to pass through and provide the digital image. Printed pictures of various sizes can also be processed by placing them on a glass plate like a conventional scanner. However I don't think this would work using a negative.
2224366
yes, it prints very nice photos. Using photo paper and photo settings improves their quality.
671061
Not really. I tried scanning OLD poloroid photos that were glued to the back of cardboard, you may be too young to remember those, but it didn't like those too much and I used my big copier/scanner for those. Also, it likes some old newpaper and not other so I would be careful about what you put thru. It did an amazing job on my photos, tho, like we got printed in the old days from Walgreen's so you can compare your project to those items. My Mom uses it for her printed out geneology that is on regular 20# printer paper and it does great. Don't know if I answered your questions but I tried.
1102092
I wouldn't think so. It's for a rough-cut sort of use for packaging and wrapping. You'd need more of a sliding sharp blade device. I sell fine art prints and this would NOT be an option. If you don't have many to cut, get a nice cork-backed metal ruler and an X-acto blade.
2188864
I think so, but I can not tell for sure. I so know I returned it because the pictures was very blurrie. I purchased a really good scanner/copier/printer and did it that way.
2278168
That's what I use it on, yes. It wont give you a glossy "photo-like" prints, but it will work.
1604577
Yes! If you have a negative space in the middle of your image, you must cut it , otherwise your image will have a white space in
1086575
It will but you would have to resize or crop in Photoshop or elements and print on the 4x6 paper then cut it