Which macro lens would you recommend to get those close up detailed pics of newborns?
1244446
The 60 works very well for this type of picture. Bugs and flowers do better with a 105 - 200 but people do better with the shorter macros.
1244447
This depends on your budget and type of SLR you have. I have just finished the first year with our grandson so I have lots of practice. To be honest, I would start off with a Sigma 35 mm "Art" series. It has a f1.4 max opening and it is fast and clear beyond belief. Then when about a year goes by you can stand back with the Nikon 60 or 85 mm lens. I prefer the 85 mm because of the tack sharpness with booka when you want it. The higher the mm lens the further you can get away and gets non posed picture. For newborns, the Sigma 35 mm Art series would be your best bet.
1244448
This is one of the better Micro/Macro that I've work with. But for newborns ? Yes, it still darn good. It would be good for tiny hands, sleepy smiles, or good for Mom and babe together. It has a focal length that is a good all around use and I've had one of these macros in my bag since 1965. If your a Nikon shooter and your question leads me to think you are or will be, stick with this 60mm, you won't be disappointed.Your the one that the lens has to please and it's you and not the equipment that takes the picture/image.
1244449
If you are already committed to the Nikon brand, then this 60mm Micro-Nikkor is an excellent choice. If your Nikon has a DX sensor like the 5100, 5200, 3100, and so on, then this lens will frame up as if it were 90mm, which is a bonus. 90mm is an excellent length for portraiture and with the Nano coating and the ED glass you will have breathtaking results and because it's a macro lens you could even move in and take photos of precious little hands and feet as well. Good luck!
1244450
They both work well. The 60mm will give you a greater Depth of field than the 105, so you will be able to have more of the subject in focus front to back.
2190424
Technicly this is a wide angle to portrait size lens not a macro lens. That being said yes you can do close ups of small objects. You will however have distortion in the wide angle range. A 100mm macro lens is a better choice for macro photoography.
13735
If you don't absolutely need macro, go for the 135. I like it way better for portraits. I actually just purchased he 100L macro but it is specifically for newborn details and wedding details. I'll keep my 135 for portraits every time.
932391
I recommend the 20mm Lumix lens. It's very sharp. The only complaint I have is when it's in auto focus mode, it has difficulty tracking moving objects.
1763824
With flowers it will work very well, with insects you may want a macro a bit longer. As for quality it is superb, but like all lenses one must use sense. There is no such thing as a one does everything lens.
986506
This lens does not have a "macro" focal point. In order to use for close- ups, you will need to attach a 500D (77mm) Close- up Lens. Magnification will be 0.34x - 0.05x.
1910998
With this lens I shoot with a nikon d5100.... Close up like macro is crisp and clear..... At the 250 range the pixels start breaking down, but you really have to look very closely at the photo to see the break down.... On a Sony, I am not sure about the photo quality..
1492415
I would recommend a macro lens instead of this... I have both and my macro lens ALWAYS takes better shots! And the macro lens was cheaper! I just got the one with a magnetic ring that goes on my iPhone! Hope this helped!
2101490
It is certainly the best lens for newborn photos in the Nikkor line. But realize that because of the smallish sensor you will not get as much bokeh as with other camera systems.
1468091
This close-up filter should work quite well photographing jewelry. It allows you to get in very close. It's very much more economical than a Macro and coupled with a zoom, gives you more flexibility. I would try it first, and if you feel it does not meet your needs, they are very saleable, and you can then move up to a Macro.
1846645
I bought, then returned this camera. Look at the D3300 - a newer and better model. I suggest you try out the kit lens for macro shots before you purchase a specific macro lens.
659559
For my N7000 I have the Nikon 18-105mm and 55-300mm lenses.I am unsure which macro lens to get.I am interested in documents photos as well as the usual insects,birds,flowers close-ups and will appreciate advice on the pros and cons of the various macro lenses ,Nikor and others,that might be suitable.
354495
Yes! It has a macro feature. This is an all-in-one lens that createsamazing photos!
354492
I personally love this lens. But then, I am not trying to photograph bugs with it. My photos are perfect and have caught some great photos of hummingbirds I was shooting recently. I have a Canon T3. It does Macro.
1910765
Yes but for close up shots of a coin I recommend a macro lens which are around the same price.
2156710
Hi there... I have this lens, and love it, for its total flexibility - it is a perfect traveller's lens. It is not exactly a "macro" lens, though I have used it with success to make some close-ups. If you then buy a close-up set (1+2+3), I am sure it can handle many of your macro needs - though you should bear in mind that that is not what it was designed for, nor is it a lens with low aperture readings - i.e. - it will be darker than your average macro lens.
294922
Mindy,I have this lens, and it's my favorite piece of gear I own. It's sharp at 1.4 (no other lens I own is as sharp as this one wide open) and it has sick contrast. I found that the 24/1.4 was too wide and added distortion and the 50/1.4 was too tight. The 35/1.4 is my go-to for any portrait session. It would be great for a newborn session because you could use it to capture the whole nursery, and you could shoot portraits without distorting the baby too much. I wouldn't recommend shooting super close to someone's face with this lens because you will see a little bit of distortion, but take a step back and you're golden. Mindy,I have this lens, and it's my favorite piece of gear I own. It's sharp at 1.4 (no other lens I own is as sharp as this one wide open) and it has sick contrast. I found that the 24/1.4 was too wide and added distortion and the 50/1.4 was too tight. The 35/1.4 is my go-to for any portrait session. It would be great for a newborn session because you could use it to capture the whole nursery, and you could shoot portraits without distorting the baby too much. I wouldn't recommend shooting super close to someone's face with this lens because you will see a little bit of... » Read More Mindy,I have this lens, and it's my favorite piece of gear I own. It's sharp at 1.4 (no other lens I own is as sharp as this one wide open) and it has sick contrast. I found that the 24/1.4 was too wide and added distortion and the 50/1.4 was too tight. The 35/1.4 is my go-to for any portrait session. It would be great for a newborn session because you could use it to capture the whole nursery, and you could shoot portraits without distorting the baby too much. I wouldn't recommend shooting super close to someone's face with this lens because you will see a little bit of distortion, but take a step back and you're golden. « Show Less