Trying to decide between the 636 or the 737. For $200 more can you tell me what more the 737 model offers?
809242
The 737 gives you 120W of power at 8ohms on all channels, the 636 gives you 95W the extra power can really make a huge difference depending on your speakers. If you have high quality speakers that can handle the power. The speakers work more effortlessly and create a better sound, they come alive. Less distortion at higher levels. It also enables your receiver not to have to work as hard. I was looking at the 636 myself but I really wanted at the very least 100W of power. You also get the THX certification - ThxSelect2plus this is a feature that can help maximize sound for more dramatic effects. I notice a nicer smoother base effect. THX Select2 Plus is recommended for medium-sized rooms where the screen-to-seat viewing distance is about 3-4 m (10-12 ft.). I have been extremely satisfied with mine and use it every day.
809243
It's actually 165 Watts/Ch (6ohms 1kHz, 2 Channels Driven, FTC) taken from the product page. From the manual:95 watts minimum continuous power per channel, 8 ohm loads,2 channels driven from 20 Hz to 20 kHz, with a maximum totalharmonic distortion of 0.08% (FTC)115 watts minimum continuous power per channel, 6 ohm loads, 2channels driven at 1 kHz, with a maximum total harmonic distortionof 0.7% (FTC)(North American)7 ch × 160 W at 6 ohms, 1 kHz, 1 ch driven of 1% (IEC) (Others)Maximum Effective Output Power7 ch × 175 W at 6 ohms, 1 kHz, 1 ch driven (JEITA) (Asian)Dynamic Power () It's actually 165 Watts/Ch (6ohms 1kHz, 2 Channels Driven, FTC) taken from the product page. From the manual:95 watts minimum continuous power per channel, 8 ohm loads,2 channels driven from 20 Hz to 20 kHz, with a maximum totalharmonic distortion of 0.08% (FTC)115 watts minimum continuous power per channel, 6 ohm loads, 2channels driven at 1 kHz, with a maximum total harmonic distortionof 0.7% (FTC)(North American)7 ch × 160 W at 6 ohms, 1 kHz, 1 ch driven of 1% (IEC) (Others)Maximum Effective Output Power7 ch × 175 W... » Read More It's actually 165 Watts/Ch (6ohms 1kHz, 2 Channels Driven, FTC) taken from the product page. From the manual:95 watts minimum continuous power per channel, 8 ohm loads,2 channels driven from 20 Hz to 20 kHz, with a maximum totalharmonic distortion of 0.08% (FTC)115 watts minimum continuous power per channel, 6 ohm loads, 2channels driven at 1 kHz, with a maximum total harmonic distortionof 0.7% (FTC)(North American)7 ch × 160 W at 6 ohms, 1 kHz, 1 ch driven of 1% (IEC) (Others)Maximum Effective Output Power7 ch × 175 W at 6 ohms, 1 kHz, 1 ch driven (JEITA) (Asian)Dynamic Power () « Show Less
809244
A big one is something called "High Instantaneous Current" which will essentially drive multiple speakers more efficiently with better sound. The 737 and above models have this whereas the 636 doesn't. The 838 added additional features along with a Push-Pull design. I'm in the market and am considering the 737 for the additional power, THX and aforementioned feature.
2196608
TBuy the SE370. You can't add needed space later. Also get the Pro package seats. They are worth the additional price for comfort and support. The SE330 is just too tight for most people. I wish I had bought the SE370.
629106
I'm curious to know what you chose and how you feel. I'm having this same problem right now. I bought the touchsmart, and it's on the way. But I'm thinking I should have considered imac. Every mac customer loves them, i'm told they last better, perhaps I should pay more for the less equipped machine.For us we primarily use the computer for websurfing, email, word processing, spreadsheets, and picture storage and minor editing (pics of our toddler for grandparents) We're as basic as they come. I have an ipad, she has an hp touchpad, we have an hp netbook, and we have 3 iphones in our family. So we're an eventually split apple/hp household. The question becomes what should i home base computer be? I'm curious to know what you chose and how you feel. I'm having this same problem right now. I bought the touchsmart, and it's on the way. But I'm thinking I should have considered imac. Every mac customer loves them, i'm told they last better, perhaps I should pay more for the less equipped machine.For us we primarily use the computer for websurfing, email, word processing, spreadsheets, and picture storage and minor editing (pics of our toddler for grandparents) We're as basic as they come. I have an ipad, she has an hp touchpad, we have an hp netbook, and we have 3 iphones in... » Read More I'm curious to know what you chose and how you feel. I'm having this same problem right now. I bought the touchsmart, and it's on the way. But I'm thinking I should have considered imac. Every mac customer loves them, i'm told they last better, perhaps I should pay more for the less equipped machine.For us we primarily use the computer for websurfing, email, word processing, spreadsheets, and picture storage and minor editing (pics of our toddler for grandparents) We're as basic as they come. I have an ipad, she has an hp touchpad, we have an hp netbook, and we have 3 iphones in our family. So we're an eventually split apple/hp household. The question becomes what should i home base computer be? « Show Less
62005
Now that the price was jacked up $200 you might want to look into getting the newer model on Apple's website (especially if you can get a student or corporate discount). If price is not as much of an issue for you, then you might want to look into the new 17-inch model because it has much better battery life and the larger screen will be better for watching movies.
2179249
It has been a while since your post. What are your thoughts on the 506? Thanks in advance.
124858
Wait for it to go on sale. Over Black Friday weekend you can get it with free shipping for $2250. CPO Jet also runs a sale in the spring.
1809837
Seriously ? Please do a real Google search for quadcopter. You will find that this is a reasonable price for this size/type/equipped copter. Larger units go for as much as $2000.
871031
I personally believe buying the BNF and the DX6i works a lot better I had issues withe the start up of the quad copter and trimming the controls. The DX6i has a monitor that you can see the trim. Also you can store 10 models in the controller. I use the DX6i with my nano QX for practice it's a lot cheaper than wrecking the 350
2236000
If you want a touch screen vs pushing buttons. And the 620 also somehow calculates VO2 when wearing the HR monitor. So basically you are paying the extra for touch screen. So if it is worth it to you. Go for it. And if not save the extra 150 and spend it on some new shoes!
137807
I don't know why but for $10, does it really matter? Don't over analyze it. Unless you are a top notch pilot, I highly recommend the guards. You could, I guess, plan on getting plenty of propellers, which may or may not be an DJI oem product....???
1753952
Good website. Thanks again for sharing your knowledge. I will probably go with the first one an get the software if needed. good advice. The new one looks pretty, gut I don't spend money if there isn't enough upgrade to justify the added espense.
1491962
Do more research. The 73 doesn't matter it is the 737 that matters. I'd you find a 62737 with same part it will fit your tv and so on
1108173
In concur with BOTH answers! The 600 is a good starter but I prefer this one (but I still kept the 600 for travel purposes).
136050
Almost forgot: You can get the FPV baord and lipos from B%H. Or just look on Amazon.
886470
The 670 is a year older than the 770 and the pricing hasn't been updated. Just buy a 7xx series now if you are going to buy new...or better yet, wait until the 9 series comes out.
1584420
I would wait till the ar drone 3.0 comes out if you want lengthy fly time and high quality camera.
1982137
The major differences would be that the new 737 is compliant with HDMI 2.0HD specification to support 4K video at 50/60 frames per second and 21:9 aspect ratio for theater. It also supports HDCP 2.2 DRM copy protection standard via HDMI Input 3 and the main output. Hollywood studios, satellite broadcasters, and internet video streaming services will adopt HDCP 2.2 for future 4K and Premium Studio Content releases. It no longer uses Audyssey calibration like the 727.