What's the difference between this antenna and the Terk FDTV1A?
818311
I think the only difference is the mounting style and the amplifier style. Other than that everything else is the same. I also bought some rabbit ears, as they were pretty cheap. My personal opinion is that the rabbit ears perform just as well, so would purchase them over the Terk FDTV2A if I had it to do all over again.
151918
I never compared any models to this antenna. I did my research and this one came out on top. After I installed it, it proved my research correct.
1930387
I'm really not sure of all the technical jargon, but I it says it is engineered to receive 1080i HDTV broadcasts not always available on satellite or cable. Perfect antenna for local HDTV reception (channels 2-69) up to 45 miles from broadcast tower. I have been using this antenna and have a perfect picture and it is 100% better then when I had cable. I get channels from Boston, MA and that is about 40 miles from me so I'm happy with the results. I'm sorry I couldn't be of more help but the customer service number for the TERK Amplified HDVa Pro is 1-800-290-6650. They may be able to answer your question more fully. I hope I helped some.
680660
I have no experience with the antenna you inquired about but did replace an Antenna Direct DB9 with the Winegard. The Winegard is slightly superior to the DB8. The only antenna I have tried that is better than the Winegard flat wave is a highly directional 177 foot Wineard that was just too long for the attic. The principal stations watched are about 50 miles away across some ridges and valleys and subject to a lot of stormy weather. The flat wave is doing pretty well, is smaller than the antenna it replaced and comes with a matched amplifier. kFor anything under 50 miles the flat wae should be quite adequite. David
1861929
All else being equal between the two antennas, the physically longer of the two would radiate the signal better. A well matched antenna of the largest physical size reasonable for the installation will always be best.
259775
We also live in a non-reception area which is why I bought the Terk antenna. It helps me get 3 stations that I use for local news and weather that I can't tune in without it. One of the stations is about 90 miles away, the other two are 50 and 60 miles away. One of my neighbors also has one and swears by it!
1404913
It looks like the same antenna with the amp installed in line between the antenna and TV. I did not buy the amplified unit because I see all of the TV towers from my window. Like any amplifier it makes a weak signal stronger. But, if you are too close the amp would be a detriment. The amp looks like it adds 15+- miles to reception USB refers to the power plug. You have USB plugs on your computer and hopefully on your TV. With the USB model, the amp gets its power from your TV USB plug rather than having to plug it into the wall socket like the one shown in the photo. Check your TV to see if it has a convenient USB plug before you buy into that.
1747229
I checked this model on ebay, the 75-300 ohm adapter should fit this model. I do not know whether this Terk Amp will improve your radio reception or not. Good luck.
135331
I have not tried the Terk AM antenna. If it cost more than the Kaito, I would not spend the extra money. This thing is well made. works great, and very tunable. Not sure how either one would work on shortwave, but I can't believe how many AM stations I can pull in. Also get stations from hundreds of miles away in the middle of the afternoon.
268433
Don't know the difference, as I doubt you'll find anyone who actually bought BOTH to tell you for sure. I can tell you that I get virtually nothing from the use of the SC-603. I've gone back to indoor antennas that get far better reception than the SC-603, and that's with the SC-603 mounted on a 10' mast.
1791933
I had the same problem with the DTA 240 Antenna. I returned it for a refund.
1542384
Not sure, remember an antenna will not pull in signals, a better antenna may just help magnify the signals there. I lived in an apartment, but I lived on the top floor of a 4 story building, nothing really blocked the signal that high. I was able to get channels other people who lived in houses couldn't. So, it all depends on where you live, and how close you think you are to the transmitters or if your in line of site to those transmitters. You might try a amplified antenna, it might help get more gain, but I too thought this Terk would do wonders, and it really didn't, if the signal isn't there it just isn't there. So, your best bet might be cable, but I understand it can be expensive. Not sure, remember an antenna will not pull in signals, a better antenna may just help magnify the signals there. I lived in an apartment, but I lived on the top floor of a 4 story building, nothing really blocked the signal that high. I was able to get channels other people who lived in houses couldn't. So, it all depends on where you live, and how close you think you are to the transmitters or if your in line of site to those transmitters. You might try a amplified antenna, it might help get more gain, but I too thought this Terk would do wonders, and it really didn't, if the signal isn't... » Read More Not sure, remember an antenna will not pull in signals, a better antenna may just help magnify the signals there. I lived in an apartment, but I lived on the top floor of a 4 story building, nothing really blocked the signal that high. I was able to get channels other people who lived in houses couldn't. So, it all depends on where you live, and how close you think you are to the transmitters or if your in line of site to those transmitters. You might try a amplified antenna, it might help get more gain, but I too thought this Terk would do wonders, and it really didn't, if the signal isn't there it just isn't there. So, your best bet might be cable, but I understand it can be expensive. « Show Less
1040012
I was able to significantly improve my radio's reception of my favorite station which is over 100 miles away. Before purchasing the Terk antenna I could get the station but it was full of static and hard to listen to. With the antenna, the station is now crystal clear. I'm happy with the antenna's performance. No guarantee it will help your reception, but if it doesn't meet your expectation just return it to Amazon for a refund.
863565
From: http://www.otatalk.com/ota-antennas-etc/2953-ant800r-vs-ant800f.html it appears that the R at least has a mounting that allows you to rotate the antenna. I am guessing that the F is for fixed and they both have the basic ANT800. Most likely the one here on Amazon, based on the reviews is the F.
259772
I was able to significantly improve my radio's reception of my favorite station which is over 100 miles away. Before purchasing the Terk antenna I could get the station but it was full of static and hard to listen to. With the antenna, the station is now crystal clear.I'm happy with the antenna's performance. No guarantee it will help your reception, but if it doesn't meet your expectation just return it to Amazon for a refund.
1422917
I am sorry, I have no idea. It is probably pure hype. The best explanation I can offer you is that Radio and TV signals require, "line of sight." At a height of ~ 10 feet, the horizon is 50-60 miles (FM radio signals do reflected from the ionosphere, increasing the distance they can be received from the transmitter). This antenna does NOTHING to enhance the signal, so any claims about distance of reception are entirely irrelevant.I found this item absolutely useless. In fact, I returned it. It is no better than a simple, 1 meter piece of copper wire. Save your money. I am sorry, I have no idea. It is probably pure hype. The best explanation I can offer you is that Radio and TV signals require, "line of sight." At a height of ~ 10 feet, the horizon is 50-60 miles (FM radio signals do reflected from the ionosphere, increasing the distance they can be received from the transmitter). This antenna does NOTHING to enhance the signal, so any claims about distance of reception are entirely irrelevant.I found this item absolutely useless. In fact, I returned it. It is no better than a simple, 1 meter piece of copper wire. Save your money.
381075
I have multiple of each model and as far as I can tell the only real difference is cosmetic. Though the antenna on the uv5ra+ Recieves much clearer and is also more discreet and durable than previous models. The programming and what not is identical on both