D40 or D60: Any thoughts?
809494
I'm trying to decide between the D40 and D60 as well. Here's an interesting read that might help: http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d60.htm
1848181
The D600 is a full frame body; therefore, if you used the 17-50 on the D600 as a DX frame, no problem. If you used it as a fullframe 24mp beast, then you would have to choose the vingetting function the camera on high, and probably shoot greater than f8.A good lens would be the 28-75 tamron 2.8, as you can use this lens on a FF body at f2.8, and is not so expensive!
356710
I would suggest getting the D610 instead at this point. All those folks that claimed that there Was no serious problem with the sensor on the D600 now have to explain why Nikon has a new model out in just one year. And it only has one area of improvement- the shutter. The shutter was the suspected culprit. Hmmm...
2102118
At the end of the day... its about image quality and flexibility vs. convenience. The G9 is one of the best P&S cameras out there and allows full manual control if you are so inclined. At 12MP it will have a higher on subject pixel density which will allow for cropping. On the other hand a 6mp cropped image (down from the full 12) will not look as good as a full size optically zoomed image (6mp full on the D40) The D40 also gives you 2.5 fps vs the ~1.5 of the G9. The D40 will have better low light (high iso) performance in comparison to the G9 due to its larger photosites. I personally have 4 cameras: Canon SD800IS for when it MUST to fit in my pocket. Canon G9 when weight and size is a factor but I want better image quality and faster response than the SD800 (or external flash). The D40 when I want good low light and the ability to mount a fast lens. I use the 18-200 VR as leave on lens, the 18-55 when I want to travel light and the 24-70 f/2.8 for high image quality (the lens is 3x price of the camera). I usually only take the one lens I intend to use with the D40. I have ordered the Nikon D3 for when there is no alternative than having the best, but at 4+lbs its a massive beast and certainly beyond the scope if this discussion. The G9 is with me at almost all times just in case I come across some shot I just have to take. If it is a really compelling image and I have the opportunity to go back and shoot it again I do so with the D40 and much better glass.
2075647
I have a D40 and its fine ans nice but not sure if it works on that, i hope this helps
1624328
As a previous owner of D600, I think I can honestly answer this question. In my opinion, I love XT1 a lot more than D600. XT-1 performs a lot better in low light and also has beautiful colors that easily beats Nikon. X-T1's burst mode and focus tracking is amazing as well. Hope this helps.
1124135
You are absolutely correct, Brian. The video with the D3S is very good and certainly exceeding web requirements, but I bought the D3S because of its high ISO performance and overall image quality. By the way, I don't think DxO has rated the D3S yet. Number 4 behind the P60, D3X and P45 is the plain-old (and great) D3. I think the D3S will come in slightly higher than the D3 due to ISO performance.
861951
It should work fine on a D40. I've been using it on my D70 have had very good results. It definitely is not built to be used as a lifetime investment, but I have had mine for a few months and haven't had any problems.
1393566
I have a d600. I would not recommend this flash for it. It is very much lacking in features. The d600 has built in commander flash, so buy a flash that can act as an off camera slave. I have the Yongnuo 468II and love it ($88 on amazon)
1866178
D40; better built. takes very good pictures. canon is too plasticky; higher-end canons are very good; but in this price range, Nikon is better; but this is a personal opinion.
422100
If money is not a factor, the D60 is a better camera. However, the D40 is so much cheaper for only slightly less functionality, so the price difference is hard to justify. If you want to spend more money, go for the D80 instead of the D60.
1033841
The Nikon D40 was a smaller camera than the D80 which I believe was the same frame as the D90. It was snug on the 80 so I would purchase the one specifically for the model you have.
227598
I am in the same boat. I am highly contemplating the d40/d40x and the Rebel xt/xti. Right now I am leaning towards the d40 as I don't plan on doing large size prints for the most part and I've heard that the Nikon lens kit is better. My only concern is that I want to do some HDR photography, and the Nikon's don't have AEB which concerns me, but I'm seeing a lot of discussion about shooting in RAW and getting similar results from one picture. Should I go with the XTi so I know I can do HDR properly and suffer with lower quality lenses, or get the D40/x and shoot in RAW and be done with it?
925686
I have D40, it works great, except for AF, since it lack internal motor. Manual focus is a snap, even at 300mm / F5.6. Maybe even faster than AF-S for $350 less... Use Tripod/Monopod when Tele, since no VR. Overall, its an excellent buy.
680069
Thank you! You are right: I too realized the d40 did not have the VR with the kit (but did have the VR zoom). I ended up ordering the d60 for the duo VR lens for $662 from Adorama. Can't wait to get started. Your point about the sync vs dust reduction made good sense for my purposes.
1515519
I found "D40 for Dummies" a lot easier to understand than the technical manual that came with the camera. The D60 has identical features of the D40 (but just has a few additional features). I read the book within a few nights and was able to take awesome photos of our recent vacation in Alaska!! The book had photo examples of the different settings and had great explanations without being over-technical. You picked a great and easy to use camera!!
520386
Absolutely! If want to get serious about your skills, it does make sense. Consider the size and weight though. The D600 is bigger and heavier, but it is also a much better performer with most of the Professional features. I upgraded from a fabulous D7000, and have not regretted it one bit. The star rating is at 4 stars, due to lots of ppl who apparently got units with sensor dust. The other complaint from ppl is related to the focusing points being mostly in the center of the frame. I have not even noticed it to be honest. Other than that, this camera ranks # 1 if you look at price, build quality, features, and of course image quality. Absolutely! If want to get serious about your skills, it does make sense. Consider the size and weight though. The D600 is bigger and heavier, but it is also a much better performer with most of the Professional features. I upgraded from a fabulous D7000, and have not regretted it one bit. The star rating is at 4 stars, due to lots of ppl who apparently got units with sensor dust. The other complaint from ppl is related to the focusing points being mostly in the center of the frame. I have not even noticed it to be honest. Other than that, this camera ranks # 1 if you look at price, build... » Read More Absolutely! If want to get serious about your skills, it does make sense. Consider the size and weight though. The D600 is bigger and heavier, but it is also a much better performer with most of the Professional features. I upgraded from a fabulous D7000, and have not regretted it one bit. The star rating is at 4 stars, due to lots of ppl who apparently got units with sensor dust. The other complaint from ppl is related to the focusing points being mostly in the center of the frame. I have not even noticed it to be honest. Other than that, this camera ranks # 1 if you look at price, build quality, features, and of course image quality. « Show Less