what is the difference between this model and the Ubiquiti BULLET-M2-HP Outdoor 802.11 B / G / N M2HP? which is better?
816335
The Titanium has an Aluminum case and is supposed to be more weather resistant than the standard plastic. The HP stands for high power. My understanding is that's more for industrial applications.
816336
This model has a aluminum housing and a better wire seal. For long term outdoor use I feel this is much better. The electronics are the same for both devices.
816337
The difference basically is that Bullet M2 Titanium is made from aircraft-grade aluminum, the casing is designed to withstand nature's harshest elements for this reason too it is less sensitive to the interferences in 2.4 Ghz.
816338
Basically its just the outer casing. Its constructed for stronger wear and tear type of weather.
816339
The Titanium model has a metal base and no signal strength/activity meter on it. It has better weatherproofing design on the cable end. I don't think there is any difference in the capabilities or size. The Titanium tends to cost more. I've worked with both types and prefer the metal housing to the plastic. I also don't like to have flashing lights where I've mounted the unit (draws attention if not covered).
1302641
I also use the PRS3100 and it works great. It also has the added benefit of having the ability to shut off the router with your leg or knee in the event of an emergency.
838810
wireless feature works well for our small network. Don't know the difference between to two models though.
1897206
the product description state that it has AC version wifi. which is Rev2 according to the Gigabyte site
870243
This model is version 2...you should skip the Netgear 3700 as this is an "N" device and move on to the next generation "AC" standard.
678912
This is a USB powered range extender that replaces your internal WiFi internet card. I recommend when using the Signal King range extender to turn off your internal card so there is less wireless interference in close proximity to the external range extender. Since both devices run on a 2.4GHz they can jam each other causing reduction in performance and range. I have experimented with leaving the wireless card on in my laptop and checking the speed of loading web pages and what not. I have seen at times a reduction in speed while the internal wireless card was on while using the the external range extender.
882908
I would be concerned about the voltage difference. Open-Mesh specifies an 18v POE while the Ubiquiti ToughSwitch is for APs requiring 24 to 48v. Might damage your AP equipment
649021
Here is a link at Ubiquiti for the UniFi product data sheet. http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/unifi/UniFi_AP_DS.pdfIt has a chart showing the difference between the indoor products. They offer both single speed (2.4 GHz) and dual band (2.4 & 5.0GHz) access points. I have installed the AP-LR in my home, improving the wireless network coverage over that provided by my D-Link router. Installed the AP-AC at a golf course, this has dual band frequencies, great for Apple products with 5.0 GHz speed wireless capabilities. Also running wireless IP cameras through this AP-AC. Great product, with reasonable pricing. Here is a link at Ubiquiti for the UniFi product data sheet. http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/unifi/UniFi_AP_DS.pdfIt has a chart showing the difference between the indoor products. They offer both single speed (2.4 GHz) and dual band (2.4 & 5.0GHz) access points. I have installed the AP-LR in my home, improving the wireless network coverage over that provided by my D-Link router. Installed the AP-AC at a golf course, this has dual band frequencies, great for Apple products with 5.0 GHz speed wireless capabilities. Also running wireless IP cameras through this... » Read More Here is a link at Ubiquiti for the UniFi product data sheet. http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/unifi/UniFi_AP_DS.pdfIt has a chart showing the difference between the indoor products. They offer both single speed (2.4 GHz) and dual band (2.4 & 5.0GHz) access points. I have installed the AP-LR in my home, improving the wireless network coverage over that provided by my D-Link router. Installed the AP-AC at a golf course, this has dual band frequencies, great for Apple products with 5.0 GHz speed wireless capabilities. Also running wireless IP cameras through this AP-AC. Great product, with reasonable pricing. « Show Less
671287
In an average sized home the 8970 and 8980 should be more than adequate for wireless. On paper the 8980 is a little faster than the 8970. I believe the 8980 is the gigabit update of the unit.
782300
At that price, no way it's M2HP. Those are ~$70. It's normal (100mW) power. http://dl.ubnt.com/b2_datasheet.pdf
1936419
Goodnight have available the about UBIQUITI NANOSTATION 2 LOCO 802.11B / G WIRELESS CPE used, Price 31.99 I hope your answer thanks
944732
Sorry about any typo. By the way, for now, you could just get any of the name brand AC1750 that is on sale. asus, netgear trendnet are all good. Don't get the AC1900 as the AC is still running at 1.3Gbps, just like the AC1750. Also, make sure you have the wireless adapter to go with the AC router. Get the one with the highest AC speed, I think it is something like 867Mbps with USB3.0, unless your computer comes with AC wireless adapter already (you may still check with the manufacturer on how fast the wireless adapter goes).
622242
Some Routers can send you both 2.5GHz & 5GHz signals the 7260 can receive both of those at the same time, this makes the signal both stronger and faster and is the reason why the 7260 is better and more $ than the 3160. Again this is entirely dependent on the router, ao if the router can't do that you won't notice a difference.
1630761
The hardware is more than capable. However the GUI front end was quite different than off the shelf routers. Many advanced functions were as of a couple of months ago only available from the command line. I've got one running at home for basic NAT, and saturate my a 25 Mb/s cable connection with torrents and it has no issue with that. However a high end Buffalo with DD-WRT , even if you turn off the radios would be my first choice. Unless you are going to use the POE for ubiquity WiFi.
1466102
No comparison at all. The yagi configuration offers much more gain and direction but at a cost of size. Get the Yagi for home use the Alpha 2200mw for a portable. With the yagis you can stack them. 2 yagis doubles the power. While still living in Oregon USA, I had quad yagis with a parabolic and reached the library Wifi over 3 miles away. But that bird did not travel with me to Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Chile, so made do with the Alpha 2200.. I get perhaps 200 yards of range. Good enough to acuire free government Wifi from a park, and two schools. Red National Interner Para Todo is free at all schools and Parks in Panama. But I also have a Claro 3.5G modem for travel, and get signal anywhere other than a tunnel. Hope this helps with your decision. Slam dunk I would use the yagi from home and stack them as needed. And I also will mention you can feed the yagi to the Alpha 2200 for even more Wifi signal gain. Doctor Gringo en Panama, AKA el Zorro
2224040
From what Ubiquiti has said, no. Even though this and the Unifi AP Outdoor are basically the same thing internally, Ubiquiti wants to keep the product lines separated.
785600
I got the Lenovo U410 September build and the WIFI is fairly stable after installing the latest Intel driver. However, the WIFI range sucks! I tested this U410 laptop with my sister's HP A6 Vision side by side in the bedroom which is about 40 feet from the router, where the router was in the living room. It crawled at around 0.2 Mbps while my sister's HP was doing 2.6 Mbps. If I bring the laptop in the living room where the router is near, the signal and connection are good and constant, along with the speed. In the living room, both laptops get about 4.5 Mbps. Her ISP is capped at 5 Mbps. I got the Lenovo U410 September build and the WIFI is fairly stable after installing the latest Intel driver. However, the WIFI range sucks! I tested this U410 laptop with my sister's HP A6 Vision side by side in the bedroom which is about 40 feet from the router, where the router was in the living room. It crawled at around 0.2 Mbps while my sister's HP was doing 2.6 Mbps. If I bring the laptop in the living room where the router is near, the signal and connection are good and constant, along with the speed. In the living room, both laptops get about 4.5 Mbps. Her ISP is capped at 5 Mbps.