Thanks for all your answers, One more time, I am upgrading from my Pentax K-r and was considering the K-5. My question now is, is there that much upside between the K-5ii and the K-50. It appears the performance and picture quality are much the same? I ask because, I can get a 2 lense bundle with the K-50 at Costco for $699. I would prefer the two lense bundle, but if the K-5ii is that much of an improvement, I will settle on the K-5ii. Thanks again for your input Thanks for all your answers, One more time, I am upgrading from my Pentax K-r and was considering the K-5. My question now is, is there that much upside between the K-5ii and the K-50. It... » Read More Thanks for all your answers, One more time, I am upgrading from my Pentax K-r and was considering the K-5. My question now is, is there that much upside between the K-5ii and the K-50. It appears the performance and picture quality are much the same? I ask because, I can get a 2 lense bundle with the K-50 at Costco for $699. I would prefer the two lense bundle, but if the K-5ii is that much of an improvement, I will settle on the K-5ii. Thanks again for your input « Show Less
792321
I haven't used the K-50. I can say the K5 is wonderful and that the K5 iis is even better. Overall image quality and low light abilities are excellent. I understand that the K50 has some better video features, (I almost never shoot video). In either case you have a huge choice of great Pentax K lenses. Guess it depends on your intended use.
792322
It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the build quality and weather sealing are probably the main differentiators. If those are not important, then the k-50 sounds like a great deal. It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the... » Read More It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the build quality and weather sealing are probably the main differentiators. If those are not important, then the k-50 sounds like a great deal. « Show Less
792323
skip the k-50. spend the extra money on the k-5 but i would highly suggest skipping that too and get the k-5iis (with the s) coz it has no AA filter hence sharper images. the k-5 right now is lower in price tho coz of the newly out k-3. if your getting a k-5ii or k-5iis why not get the k-3? theyre the same price i believe. but ya my k-5 is a keeper.
792324
Just from friends words I would take the two lens. The difference is not noticeable. Not my opinion.
1634146
Pentax K-5II autofocus is excellent. I locked myself in a dark closet to see how good it was and I was able to focus and shoot pretty fast. I moved from a Pentax K20D and had the same issue with the camera... loved the pics but the autofocus sucked. I know people who have moved from the Nikon 60D and Cannon 5D to the Pentax K-5ii impressed by the AF speed. Hope this helps. Good luck!
1612407
I went from a Canon DSLR to the Pentax K-30. So far I am very happy with this camera. In the "Auto" mode it is similar to using a point and shot camera. But the camera has many more advanced features that you can use. Also, Pentax K-30 allows you to use lens from older SLR Pentax camera. I am using 2 lens that were from a film type SLR!
767674
Oh, and the larger aperture allows you to play with depth of field and shoot in low light conditions without having to crank up the ISO and the associated noise. It's really nice for portraits. If you are looking for top quality in a "normal" lens(like a 50mm was in film formats) you can pay alot for the great Pentax 31mm or (right now) about the same as the 50mm for a DA 35mm that is still a very nice lens. BTW: Pentax is planning on putting out an "improved" series of fixed lenses at a higher price so you might want to take advantage of the clearance sales now.
1011461
Can anyone tell me if have a lens (18-55 mm f/ 3.5 - 5.6 or anythings else) better than Pentax to exchange in my Pentax K-7? Exist lens make by others manufactories which could give more quality than Pentax? Can anyone tell me that?
1700413
I bought and returned lens years ago and moved on to a Nkion system. I had problems with the lens back-focusing on the K10 which had no way of adjusting the focus in camera, so be aware of this issue depending on which body you have. As I recall, the lens was new in Pentax box with warranty. I would check the return policy just in case.
1612403
Sandra, that's what I did -- went from a small Panasonic point-and-shoot to the K-30. I've had the camera for several months now and while I'm still learning, I've gotten quite comfortable with it. The manual is very good and the controls make sense. It's a very different experience, not least because of the size, but I'm glad I decided to buy it. As others noted, you can start with it on auto and experiment at your own pace. The weather sealing is very liberating, so if you decide to get it, I would recommend getting one of the weather-resistant lenses. Good luck!
2058086
I have the Pentax lens and absolutely love it. I do not have, nor have never used, the Tamron lens. However, Pentax forums has some very good reviews of it (http://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/tamron-70-200mm-f2-8-di-ld-macro.html). You might want to ensure that's the exact lens you are looking to buy.You lose one stop with the Pentax. Depending on the camera you have, that may be a big deal. I've found I can use the 60-250 with a TC in bright light without problems (it's a 5.6 lens when the TC is used with it) for action photography. I use mine for wildlife and sports photography (outdoor mainly) and it does everything I need. I have the Pentax lens and absolutely love it. I do not have, nor have never used, the Tamron lens. However, Pentax forums has some very good reviews of it (http://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/tamron-70-200mm-f2-8-di-ld-macro.html). You might want to ensure that's the exact lens you are looking to buy.You lose one stop with the Pentax. Depending on the camera you have, that may be a big deal. I've found I can use the 60-250 with a TC in bright light without problems (it's a 5.6 lens when the TC is used with it) for action photography. I use mine for wildlife and sports... » Read More I have the Pentax lens and absolutely love it. I do not have, nor have never used, the Tamron lens. However, Pentax forums has some very good reviews of it (http://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/tamron-70-200mm-f2-8-di-ld-macro.html). You might want to ensure that's the exact lens you are looking to buy.You lose one stop with the Pentax. Depending on the camera you have, that may be a big deal. I've found I can use the 60-250 with a TC in bright light without problems (it's a 5.6 lens when the TC is used with it) for action photography. I use mine for wildlife and sports photography (outdoor mainly) and it does everything I need. « Show Less
558817
From what I read about your K5iis it has a 1.5x focal factor meaning a 28mm converts to a 42mm lens. This 50mm would be a 75mm. At least that's the way I understand it
1771451
I really didn't consider K-3 or K-50. The K-5IIs is a very nice camera that takes fantastic pictures. Its sturdy and extremely well built and feels like it will last. Shutter has a nice crisp sound and feel. Would maybe have been nice to have Wi-Fi built in, but I bought Eye-Fi SD card and that works reasonable well as well.
2173346
The best review of these two lenses in on Ken Rockwell's website. I currently have the Canon35 1.4 and the 35 2.0 non-is. I also had the 35 2.0 IS but sold it and then got the non-IS on eBay. Why? The IS is great but big and I was looking to put together a lighter combo than the 5DMK3 and 1.4. I have a 6D that fits the bill and thought the new 35 IS would work well as an everyday combo to carry around. The image quality is very good but it is big. So, I sold it, found a good version of the non-IS, and in combination with the 6D it meets all my needs. Good quality images, smaller lens, less weight.
1321840
I think the T5i is a better choice is you are willing to spend the extra money. It's faster and more capable, plus it comes with the newer 18-55 STM kit lens, which not only has benefits for autofocus during video, but it's also noticeably sharper optically than the older 18-55 kit lens bundled with the T5. The two have the exact same 18MP sensor, however, so image quality is probably very similar. Plus, you get an articulating LCD and capacitive touch screen with the T5i and the screen has more than double the resolution of the T5's. The T5 is not a bad camera despite its use of older technology, it's just way too expensive at it's starting price. If it were to drop down to say, $400-$450, it would be a better buy.
1274514
I have the Canon 40D. I have the 70-200L lens, but that's the only L lens I have. I haven't regretted the switch.I've found the X-T1 image quality surpasses that of my 40D, but I wouldn't know about the 50D. I believe the X-T1 might be on a par with the 5DII or III, in terms of image quality, given that the X-T1 has the APS-C sensor and not a full frame sensor. There is superb glass available for the X-T1 and all the fuji X cameras. But no one can say that another person should switch. If you have a lot invested in Canon glass, it might be foolish for you to start investing in a lot of new lenses. All I can say, is that I am very happy switching to the fuji system. I have the Canon 40D. I have the 70-200L lens, but that's the only L lens I have. I haven't regretted the switch.I've found the X-T1 image quality surpasses that of my 40D, but I wouldn't know about the 50D. I believe the X-T1 might be on a par with the 5DII or III, in terms of image quality, given that the X-T1 has the APS-C sensor and not a full frame sensor. There is superb glass available for the X-T1 and all the fuji X cameras. But no one can say that another person should switch. If you have a lot invested in Canon glass, it might be foolish for you to start investing in a lot... » Read More I have the Canon 40D. I have the 70-200L lens, but that's the only L lens I have. I haven't regretted the switch.I've found the X-T1 image quality surpasses that of my 40D, but I wouldn't know about the 50D. I believe the X-T1 might be on a par with the 5DII or III, in terms of image quality, given that the X-T1 has the APS-C sensor and not a full frame sensor. There is superb glass available for the X-T1 and all the fuji X cameras. But no one can say that another person should switch. If you have a lot invested in Canon glass, it might be foolish for you to start investing in a lot of new lenses. All I can say, is that I am very happy switching to the fuji system. « Show Less
1477346
Np. K5 sii is a kick arse little cam, hopw you are planning on purchasing one ;) or add $300 more and go for the k3 (uses d-li 90 as well :) )
436667
The K-5IIs does not even include a low pass filter capability so your pictures are sharper, but will also tend to contain more moire effects. See article at the following link: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/6059494336/review-in-progress-pentax-k-5-ii-and-k-5-ii-s/2
923246
I too have the 45-175. Keep an eye out prices vary all the time. If you see a 'great deal' (especially used) GRAB IT. That is true for all items on Amazon. Now, you have three lenses and you must have a kit lens with your G5? If you have a bare G5 then none of these is my best advice, you will not like how 45mm (effectively 90mm) is not nearly 'wide' enough for close up shots... So, assuming you have a 14-42 and this is your SECOND lens you have price and age to decide. lowest cost (and low weight) is the newest 45-150 (2012). Best overall range, in my biased opinion, is the 45-175 (2011) Significantly older and middle of the three pricewise (and much heavier and larger) is the 45-200 (2008). Really, like someone else said, just keep checking (sometimes the price will change significantly during a day), I got my 45-175 for 192 and change last June. Best of luck!
1881214
K5IIs , I guess. Pictures are sharper. I use Rokinon 85M-P 85mm F1.4 Aspherical Lens for Pentax (Black). on Tripod.I am not a professional.