Is this the same as the VX3? What's different if it isn't?
806570
The V1930 is narrower and empties differently than the VX3. The V1930 is probably more for quick sweeps in smaller places. The VX3 has more room for dirt and debris in its dirt cup and will sweep a larger area since it is wider. I have both and have been pleased with the performance of both of them. The V1930 has done a good job of picking up cat fur.
806571
Looks pretty close but from my quick search the VX3 is model #V1950 and this one is #V1930. Beyond that, I don't see much difference.
984782
As I understand it the only difference is the bundle package. The camera is the same HX-300 in all cases. I love mine and am so pleased with what this camera can do.
730388
They come out with a new model every year. Just get the one that's being sold now. The vsx 31 or 32
9713
That's what is pictured. The v3 is a significant downgrade. The v3 has no speed indication lights (100/1000) and no mounting holes. Much better to buy a used v2 instead.
124027
I think the lens coating is one of the differences. I own the VX 1 all the way up to the MK IV and have never had a problem with any, the warranty is the same for all models as well
602130
The V3 has a usb wireless antenna that plugs into the back of the box. A V2 does not have the wireless usb. The box itself is the same.
1916342
680.v3 is more for a club and scratching environment, good low response. The 680e.v3 is more for monitoring and remixes. Very clear and good stereo imaging, not too good for groove holding and scratching. As far as the interchangeability, I am unsure. Hope I answered your question.
24335
Bought mine almost a year ago and it was V3, don't know what they are selling today
489800
Sorry, haven't had the opportunity to try and compare the SX1is to the other two models.I'll tell you this though, after taking the SX30is for a test run there is NO WAY I would keep it over my SX20is when it xomes to the discussion of image quality.
2264315
I'm not sure where you are looking that the luxx is 3x more. On the manufactures website the luxx is $299. This version is $199 and has 5000 pulses (according to the description). There is an upgrade kit for this one as well that allows you to add the 120,000 pulses later that is $100. So you might as well get the lower cost one and upgrade later.
1763058
Thanks for the info. The VSX-9040 is only $6 more. Let us know how you like it if you get it. I haven't decided yet.
752733
The v3 is the better one because it will work on any 3d tv. The v3 is also compatible with the finepix v3 camera
374640
To me the vxl is a little to fast to really enjoy, if you want super fast go with the vxl if you fast enough to really enjoy go with the summit. Hope this helps
888824
I am using the Vivitar version of this and as far as I can see, there is no difference other than the price. I have not only mounted this on a tripod, but also a monopod.
85339
The biggest difference is the new X-Trans sensor which removes the optical low pass filter (OLPF)... making pics much sharper than they were in the x10. Here's more from dpreview's review (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x20/): At first glance, the X20 looks just like its predecessor (the X10), although it's now available in a very pretty silver-and-black finish, alongside the conventional all-black. But inside it offers a couple of very significant differences. The first is a brand-new sensor, a 2/3" type 'X-Trans CMOS' design that uses the same novel color filter array as Fujifilm's recent APS-C cameras. This sensor also has phase detect autofocus built right into it - not new to Fuji cameras, but a change from the X10. The second big change is an updated 'Advanced Optical Viewfinder' that includes a detailed information overlay, showing key exposure data and focus confirmation. This isn't the same as the hybrid viewfinder found in the company's X100/X100S and X-Pro1 models - there's no electronic viewfinder - but it's never been done before on a compact camera. The X20 is available in silver/black and all-black bodies Aside from this, the X20 retains most of the same features that made the X10 so appealing. It uses the same fast zoom lens, with a 28-112mm equivalent angle of view and F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture, which is operated by a mechanically-coupled zoom ring that also retracts the lens and turns the camera on and off. It has plenty of external controls, including an exposure compensation dial and two rear dials, and a hot shoe for external flash. One feature notable by its absence is a direct movie record button - the X20 is clearly designed for still photography first, and video second.
942732
Looks like they are the same. I love my expedition 3. Is it time to go camping all ready !!!!
1117273
I can't compare because I haven't used the previous version. What I can tell about this one - it's very good and I'm 100% satisfied. I used it while snowboarding few weeks ago and movies recorded are great quality and device itself is really resistant for severe condition. XA1 has less pixels and batery life a bit shorter (according to producent description) but I haven't verified this in practice so my opinion might be not so reliable