Someone using it for the Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM Lens?
793442
I use it with the canon 100-400L and it fits fine, but I have to remove the lens hood and put it on backwards. Plenty of room width-wise, even with the lens mounting ring attached.
793443
Yes, you have to take the lens hood off and reverse it back over the lens, then the lens will will nicely in the Think Tank Lens Changer 75.
2135547
It fits all EF lenses, but it doesn't work for me. If it does work for anyone, could you please share with others how you accomplished that??
207492
Yes and no. The EF 75-300mm IS USM is a much better quality lens. You get what you pay for. If you intend to use the lens without a tripod then you would absolutely need the image stabilization. That said, I would look at refurbished lenses on the Canon website. You can get this lens for $519.99. I purchased one from there and I am totally happy with the purchase. Hope this helps.
1380194
I purchased this lens for my husband. He wanted a fixed lens, not a zoom. It takes great pictures. However, the Canon 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS USM looks like a beautiful lens, and if this is your first, perhaps it is more versatile for your needs.
1731713
no it is not. take a look at all the Canon brand lens that are USM http://www.slrphotographyguide.com/camera/canon-digital-slr/usm-lens.shtml
2167454
I do not have that lens. This hood fits my 67mm 17-85mm IS USM perfect. Just a twist and it snaps on. Perhaps Canon or a good camera shop can give positive feedback.
318650
Yes it is. I use it in manual setting with my 70-300mm lens. It does not work well with auto focus when the lens is opened fully to 300mm.
767103
If you mean Canon 70-300 (vs. 75-300), then the answer is yes, it fits nicely. I don't know anything about a 75-300 lens.
620521
Whether it will fit depends on what the specific lens filter thread size is for the lens you are using. I am guessing an 18-300 lens will have a larger thread than 52mm. To locate your lens thread size either check the manual or the back of your lens cap.
997238
The "EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III" isn't designed to use a lens collar at all, it has no location to fit any collar around it, and it isn't heavy enough to need one either. I have the "70-300mm F/4.0-5.6L IS USM" and that one is a heavy beast and is clearly designed for a collar, and benefits from using one. I do have the Photodiox collar for that lens and can say they do make great products for the price, assuming they claim compatibility for your lens.
60354
Yes! It is a perfect fit and great lens for under $300. Highly recommend especially for kid sports.
681554
If I were you, I would sell the kit lens and the 28-135mm is usm, the latter of which I had and sold because I purchased the 17-85mm is usm and then the 15-85mm is usm. If you figure out the perfect size and type of camera bag, the 15-85mm & 70-300 together give you plenty of range. Plus carrying a lens like the 85mm f/1.8 for low light, if it will fit in the bag, makes for a very useful combination.
725176
The case fits my 28-300mm F3.5-5 lens with the lens hood on (reversed, of course). It's a bit tight, but it works.
1994998
A blast from the past, KISS in japan, to answer your question, YES this will fit the EF mount on your Canon EOS 300 35mm camera. You should get good results with it.
993770
Hi Christina. Yes, the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS lens works perfectly with the Canon EOS-70D camera and the recently released EOS-7D Mk II as well. It is one of my favorite hand-holdable lens Canon makes. Visit my website to see photos taken with this lens.
1716984
Hello Amy, I really haven't used this product since I bought it; I initially thought it was the 24-70mm f 2.8L. As a matter of fact, I will be returning it. I am, therefore, not the best person to give a critique. However, I'm sure you'll find these links useful: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-28-70mm-f-2.8-L-USM-Lens-Review.aspxhttp://www.fredmiranda.com/24-70/
785357
Well, I'm not sure. It fits my 70-200mm f/2.8 with the lens hood upside down and the tripod mount bracket just perfect. It takes up all of the width inside. There's some length to spare. Soooo... Maybe? Will depend on how big your 300 is. I could send a picture if you like.