Difference btwn ES8249S and ES8249K besides color and price? The only differences I see are the color ("S" versus "K" in the model number = silver vs black) and the approx $40 difference in price with this model being the less expensive one.
800892
I'm also trying to figure this out. Panasonic's website is useless for determining it too. The only thing it says is that there is an "N/A" for the low battery indicator but then the image still shows a battery meter...
1629764
I know this is much later than the original post, but in case anyone else is wondering the same I thought I'd answer it. I tried both, and ended up sticking with the ES8249S. However, there is not much of a difference at all. They have the same volume when shaving, they have the same comfort level, same close shave, the cleaner unit is the same, the display on the razor is the same.... The only difference is the 4th blade. I do think because of that the 8249S is just a bit quicker to shave my whole face, but it was not much of a difference at all. They were priced the same after Christmas due to steep Amazon price cuts and a 20 dollar rebate, so I got a great deal on the 8249S, otherwise I'd be perfectly fine with the ES8109S for a cheaper price.
507392
Looking at the model numbers, they appear to be about the same.All black: MRS152-30 (originally $23)Shiny black w/ silver: MRS152UV-3 (originally $40)Since they appear to have the same set-up (2 sockets, 2 USB ports - 1A, 2.1A), I'm guessing the price difference relates to the plain plastic vs. fancy shiny casing.
1993717
if it is the same product line, then there is no difference except for the color. I did notice that there is quite a difference depending on the color you choose. For example, if you choose Teal or Black, the cost is higher than that of Purple.
1635531
The UST25 looks different from the US25 (one is silver. One black). But also the design is different. LED is in a diff spot. But specks for the 2 look alike. I have the US25 model and have no complaints. And it is ~$4 cheaper than the UST25. But specs look identical. Hope this helps!
1110132
the only difference is that the ES8243A has an extra blade. I think having the extra blade helps get those hair growing in tight areas around your neck. instead having to shave it numerous times, you get to do it twice maybe three times max. its twenty dollars more expensive too so if your skin isn't as sensitive as mine and you want to save a few bucks but still have a good shaver then i guess you should get the ES8103S
1339501
I think there is no difference. It depends on the price. You will be able to choose better one for you. Good luck.
1177487
I have been tracking the 4095/4096, 4061, and 4065 for a while now and have spent some time on the phone with Samsung to learn the differences. The 4095 and 4096 were both at one time quite affordable on Amazon. They are last year's models and thus if you can find them either have a low price tag because they are old or a slightly higher pricetag well, simply because people still show interest in these TVs. Both received excellent reviews and were amongst the best rated LCDs of 2006. As far as 2007 goes - the 4061 and 4065 have stepped in. The 4065 is a replacement of the 4096, with a higher contrast ratio and additional HDMI inputs. The 4061 is really just a step below that with slightly lower quality speakers. However, from what I have read the 4061 has a new image processor over last year's models. The 4061 also has a slightly lower contrast ratio than the 4065. Having seen all of these models in store - I can tell you visually, you will never truly see a difference between the 4061 and 4065. With proper calibration and settings - most LCDs can be made to look fantastic, and the 4061 is simply above par. Despite its semi-poor sound, if you hook it up to a receiver and use other speakers, it doesnt really matter. Amazon is the way to shop - prices are always coming down - and remember to check back after purchase for they will reimburse you if the price drops lower within the month. Hope this helps.
102679
As stated, "F" is a 2013 model. It also has a higher Clear Motion Rating (960 vs 840) & a Quad Core Processor vs a Dual Core.The "F" model is worth the price, but I think that the "ES" model is still pretty impressive.
1268570
It is not a light blue color, it is a dark color. But caution: if you live in the US, I walked into my local Costco and saw the last years model E1 on sale for $249 with instant rebate. I was kinda pissed because Costco did not have it before there, and of course once I bought E2 they got it. E2 is probably better than E1 but is it $100 better?
942411
I am pretty sure the difference is color only. Some colors are more popular than others and therefore cost more. Some colors are probably over-stocked and therefore cost less. As far as I can see - no difference based on the color.
1809361
I have no idea as to the differences - I ordered the silver because it fit my needs and it does that
1884793
What about the ES8228S? Is this one an improvement on the 8168? Other than some ebay listings, I haven't found much info anywhere.
1682894
they're actually all the same. it's just the matter of what types of switch (blue,brown, black for cherry). If you don't mind the noise, then blue is the loudest. In my opinion all are the same, so look at your budget and just buy the cheapest in the ones you list. They're all good keyboards.Or you can buy the Razer Blackwidow for $80. It's pretty good deal for a mechanical keyboard and it's pretty new, came out in September or October i forget.
2218224
The k800 is about four times more expensive at $99.00 retail. Its a wireless wifi based large rechargeable keyboard. Its pretty high end with features that are great. The Azio is about same size with large easy read keys that are backlit in any of three colors. The keyboard is lit all the time as long as its plugged into a USB port. The Azio is fine for me.
84964
I think Amazon is playing with the prices. Now the black is $4 less than the silver $257 vs $261.
938250
the only difference between the systems is the color of the receiver. the reason why the 2300 has a higher retail price is because it came out a year earlier