320 vs 310 Good day. Does anyone know the difference between the Spirit 320 and the Spirit 310? As far as I can tell, the only difference appears to be a left side-burner on the 320. Along with about $80! 320 vs 310 Good day. Does anyone know the difference between the Spirit 320 and the Spirit 310? As far as I can tell, the only difference appears to be a left side-burner on the 320. Along with... » Read More 320 vs 310 Good day. Does anyone know the difference between the Spirit 320 and the Spirit 310? As far as I can tell, the only difference appears to be a left side-burner on the 320. Along with about $80! « Show Less
788463
I belive the center Burner is a searing burner on the 320 not a regular 12,000 btu on the 310. I'm looking at both also.
589638
The Spirit is a lower end grill, still good though. The Geneses has 3 verticle burners, Spirit 2 horizontal, so you only get indirect cooking. The Spirit is phycially smaller and made with lighter materials, also there is quite a big price difference. I know 3 people who have the Spirit, they all like it, but 2 would upgrade to the Genesis next time.
274343
I have this at my FL home but have not used it yet. I do however have a new Webber 2 burner Spirit and love it. It is twice the price but great.
1811098
The new 2-burner Spirit Es flip down, the new 3-burner do not. Weber will not sell the owner of a 3-burner model the mods necessary for flip-down side tables. If space is an issue, you'll want the 2-burner model....which is what I should have done. I only discovered this AFTER assembly (over 2 hours). Called Weber and while they were nice, there is no way they are going to help. I even offered to pay for new tables, flip-down hardware, etc.
632329
personally, I didn't think so. that's why I bought the E-310 rather than the E-330. keep in mind that the 330 comes with the sear feature and a side burner too. exclusive of the sear feature, you should ask yourself whether you want the side burner.
1770931
From what I've read, the little one sounds exactly like mine, the one for $132. I would buy the cheaper one. I use it every day and love it!!
158159
These do not fit the older Spirit E-310. I found this out when I ordered it. Hope this reply saves some people the trouble/effort. Happy Summer!
1326563
The CC(Chef's Choice)130 is essentially the SAME as the 320 EXCEPT it has an ADDITIONAL "Polishing" stage (Whatever that means). I have been using my 320 for over 3 years now and it works GREAT - sharpens ALL my knives - straight edged AND serrated edge ... and it was about $40 less.,
1215367
I think they are the same except the 9325 shown doesn't have the window that the 9309W has. I've found that the window doesn't make much difference anyway since after a few uses the smoke and soot blocks your view. The cooking part is the same though.
1606030
The only difference I know is the cup/bowl included at a little higher price. The idea of the Hot Shot is a good one. This newer version often leaks. I find the ones I purchased all leak. It is hard to find the earlier version. To recognize it, it has operating levers at the front bottom of the reservoir. It is model 3211. I don't recommend this newer one. You'd be better off with an electric kettle.
702085
As this question is about the TS 8000, I understand you are asking what is different with it from the TS4000. Having read the two product listings, I can say that this item is claimed to burn hotter, and it has an adjustment valve built in, so you can make it hotter or cooler, adjusting the flame to your desired preference for your specific task. Also, it appears that this item has a trigger lock, allowing you to set it to burn without having to hold the trigger down while burning.
742175
Sorry to say, I'm not sure of any difference. Both seem to be identical. I just know that I love mine and I'm sure you would too. Good luck!
1317011
Hi, not sure what the difference is exactly, but I must admit that I find this one much better than the previous one. It is lighter and more durable so I fully recommend getting 83 slow. Sorry I can't be more of help
849205
Not sure what you are saying there JC. The "315" series cartridges are high capacity and last longer than the 310 series cartridges. Otherwise they both work fine. Having tried both the 310 and 315's I would reccommend the 315's. They are more expensive but they do last a lot longer than the 310's.
1831293
I own the 110 and 200. I think the 200 gives more light. But the build is better on the 110. So from looking at them I think the 130 is built like the 110 with the light of the 200.
794634
Lorraine, I do not think that there is a whole lot of difference between the two models. I own the variable speed version and I happen to use it at the upper end of the speed scale most of the time. About the only time I've really needed to slow it down was when I was sanding some non kiln dried pine and found that the higher speads heated up the wood and the sap began to run (a lot). At the lower speads I was better able to sand the pine without having as much sap run and therefore clog the dandpaper. If you don't want to pay the premium for the variable, I'm pretty sure in day to day use you really won't see the difference. However, my opinion comes from a hobbyist woodworker. Cheers! -steve- Lorraine, I do not think that there is a whole lot of difference between the two models. I own the variable speed version and I happen to use it at the upper end of the speed scale most of the time. About the only time I've really needed to slow it down was when I was sanding some non kiln dried pine and found that the higher speads heated up the wood and the sap began to run (a lot). At the lower speads I was better able to sand the pine without having as much sap run and therefore clog the dandpaper. If you don't want to pay the premium for the variable, I'm pretty sure in day to day use... » Read More Lorraine, I do not think that there is a whole lot of difference between the two models. I own the variable speed version and I happen to use it at the upper end of the speed scale most of the time. About the only time I've really needed to slow it down was when I was sanding some non kiln dried pine and found that the higher speads heated up the wood and the sap began to run (a lot). At the lower speads I was better able to sand the pine without having as much sap run and therefore clog the dandpaper. If you don't want to pay the premium for the variable, I'm pretty sure in day to day use you really won't see the difference. However, my opinion comes from a hobbyist woodworker. Cheers! -steve- « Show Less
513918
There's a lot of discussion about the advantages of the old version in the Amazon user reviews of both versions. I bought the (more expensive) old version and am happy with it, but never tried the newer one for comparison.