Is this Amprobe BAT-200 superior to the under $2 BAT-168?
809519
From what I can see, it looks like it will test the same variety of batteries, but just a heads up on button cell batteries, on the BAT-200 it will test the 1.5v button cell correctly. But it looks like the 3v button cell battery will register but the needle is maxed out and not reading battery is good, it's just pegged out, I'm just waiting for one of my 3v button cell's to get weak so I can test it and compare results with a volt/ohm meter.
809520
i don't really know that BAT-168, but for under $7.00 this worked just fine for what I needed it for. Had a bunch of batteries that got mixed with 'dead' batteries, and needed to find the good ones. did the job and was easy to use.
985176
Can't compare it to the 180 as I never had it. I like the RS 220. Beautiful sound, volume range fine, very rarely drops signal. Really brings out the depth in my vinyl, as well as adding something to digital music.
1101558
If you have the extra $200 bucks to spare for the SVS give it a shot, try it out, they have a customer satisfaction trial return window if it doesn't feel right to you return it. I have not heard the SVS pb so I can't compare. I have an SVS tube with amp. It is quality sound but not too room filling. I added this Klipsch 12 HG and wow what a difference. Hands down it has more room filling bass for my movies. You can spend a lot of money for promised quality or you can spend the right amount for the delivered quality your looking for. I started with one SVS sub and over time have gone for two subs (Klipsch 12HG) and that is an awesome set up. FYI- I have two Klipsch subs in my game room also, for the price, it's a great deal. Enjoy!
1506758
Ditto, This player brought my lexicon dc2,bridged carver amps, and klipsch chorusll's(4 of them) back to life.I had a pioneer dv05, thx, like everything else listed here,and simply cannot believe what I was missing in sound quality from the pioneer. This player could pick up a pin dropping in the middle of a pete townsend solo(doesnt get any louder than that).Yes the blueray is very good, yes the upconverting is very good, but the sound is only surpassed slightly by the denon (4500.00) blueray player.Buy it for 500.00, I paid a thousand for the dv05, Technology just keeps jumping by leaps and bounds. Ditto, This player brought my lexicon dc2,bridged carver amps, and klipsch chorusll's(4 of them) back to life.I had a pioneer dv05, thx, like everything else listed here,and simply cannot believe what I was missing in sound quality from the pioneer. This player could pick up a pin dropping in the middle of a pete townsend solo(doesnt get any louder than that).Yes the blueray is very good, yes the upconverting is very good, but the sound is only surpassed slightly by the denon (4500.00) blueray player.Buy it for 500.00, I paid a thousand for the dv05, Technology just keeps jumping by leaps... » Read More Ditto, This player brought my lexicon dc2,bridged carver amps, and klipsch chorusll's(4 of them) back to life.I had a pioneer dv05, thx, like everything else listed here,and simply cannot believe what I was missing in sound quality from the pioneer. This player could pick up a pin dropping in the middle of a pete townsend solo(doesnt get any louder than that).Yes the blueray is very good, yes the upconverting is very good, but the sound is only surpassed slightly by the denon (4500.00) blueray player.Buy it for 500.00, I paid a thousand for the dv05, Technology just keeps jumping by leaps and bounds. « Show Less
460597
Dan, keep looking and you will find the Saffire for less than the PreSonus 24/96. Personally, I was focused on getting the Saffire Pro 40 and was monitoring the price every day here in Amazon. Found an awesome deal, pulled the trigger and never looked back. This is my current interface and my next upgrade is to pair it with an OctoPre from Focusrite. Can't go wrong with Focusrite.
2005572
The 2M Red Ortifon that comes with it is excellent. If you are looking to replace it, I would not go "inexpensive" -- that would only let this fine turntable down. I believe the 2M Red retails for around $100. Audio Technica sells many alternatives for under $100, if you're willing to sacrifice sound quality. I was happy with an AT95e that I used on an old Marantz TT for years. Amazon has them for around $25.
156677
The two units are quite different designs and have different use cases, so a comparison is not really valid. If all you want is an inexpensive AptX/amp combo and you're not a highly critical listener, then the grace might be a good choice. (I haven't seen or tested the grace unit.)If you want more I/O (analog and digital, including a 96/24 USB inerface), a good hi-fi amp, solid build quality, and not having to fuss with a wall wart, then the NAD is a good choice. I'll also mention my 1970s NAD 3020 (which inspired this unit) is still working well.
1299300
The mm6501 definately sounds better, but if your not amplifying the speakers your better off with the lower end set... No point in spending extra $ on a nice set if your not going to give it the power it needs
931317
I have actually listened to both and I'd have to say the the denons I bit more powerfull with the amp turned on. The clarity is great and good quality product. At under 200 it's a steal.
2222818
I can only speak for myself. I found a significant difference between the sound of the pre-amp in my Yamaha receiver and the Bellari. I should also state that a new, better tube and power supply made a good difference as well. It is also dependent upon the cartridge you are using. I have a Blue Point and a Pickering. An audiophile friend states that the Ortofon is a good choice as well.
206112
The 250 ohm pros have a little more bass and clamp a little tighter around your head. The difference doesn't amount to much, and it certainly doesn't amount to paying $200 extra. Just go with the pros and you'll be good. You also shouldn't have a problem with your Sound Blaster Z and these.
878611
it will sound good. louder than one might think. i love the little guy. i've had amps for way more $ and be equal or less than good. the el84 plus the 12x7 yadda yadda is the same as a Vox. A class too. sounds like a beatles amp, but raunchier. problems... the cheap ass plugs electric hook up thingsy is eggshellish. cut corners somehow i guess. if you can afford the speaker cab, i'd go for it. the speaker is voiced for the amp and breaks up when driven at the right time. lovely.
402211
The Clubs are better when used as a 2.0 System. I own both and I can say that yes, the MB42X's are more refined but lack low end. If you are planning to add a sub in the future (2.1 system), get the MB42X's and a sub (Martin Logan Dynamo 300). The Clubs can go loud and low, just get a powerful amplifier because they are harder to drive than the MB42X's.
742559
CX200 is better because is capable with low frequency waves. It means better bass experience.
2134404
In my experience the 2020A is a significantly better amp. It's twice the cost... but worth it. This amp has poor quality control, tents to overhead and perform inconsistently. For around $20, the 2020A is still cheap... and definitely preferable.
235868
Wasn't familiar with the PL-518, so I looked at the unit online. Looks like it should work. The Shure has the standard 2 screw attachment points, like the Pioneer headshell I saw online. My original intent was to use the old headshell from my 80's Technics TT, but the wires on the Shure were beefier than on my old headshell. I purchased a generic one from a local record shop (really), but you can find them on Amazon also. I've never owned a Stanton 680EE or other Stanton products. I found a rave review for this unit, however, so I'm sure you're happy with it. The Shure M97xE was a bit of a compromise for me, I found it for under $70 and it was reviewed well, so I went for it instead of the AT440MLA @ $140. I'm very happy with the Shure unit, and truth be told, I use my garage stereo more than my living room stereo, so I guess I'm not that picky anyway. Of course the AT440MLA is over $200 now, so kinda wish I bought it back then. Hope you find something good at Record Store Day tomorrow. Clark
275210
Honestly, I can not compare as I have not tried the other. Obviously, it has lots more power. As a previous audiophile, I can tell you that although "sound bars" are convenient they do not compare with real amplifiers and reals speakers. I can tell you I am happy with the sound, and the digital input works well with my 60 inch 1080p 3D TV. My only complaint is when you use digital input you have to use the rinky dink remote that came with the sound bar to control the volume. My advise is don't skimp on sound it is just as important as the picture when it comes to watching movies. Honestly, I can not compare as I have not tried the other. Obviously, it has lots more power. As a previous audiophile, I can tell you that although "sound bars" are convenient they do not compare with real amplifiers and reals speakers. I can tell you I am happy with the sound, and the digital input works well with my 60 inch 1080p 3D TV. My only complaint is when you use digital input you have to use the rinky dink remote that came with the sound bar to control the volume. My advise is don't skimp on sound it is just as important as the picture when it comes to watching movies.