SD 900 v. 800IS: IS v. more MP and titanium casing: Does the IS on the 800 just make it a more attractive camera (for a more typical "point-and-shoot" user), or do the increase in megapixels and titanium casing on the 900 outweigh the lack of image...
814284
I have ordered the SD 800 and was unsatisfied in that even though it is attractive, the quality of it is not great, it feels like it's made of plastic and it's extremely light. The SD 900 is definately more durable, I stopped in a local electronic store and got a feel for it. The SD 800 is a lot smaller than the SD 900 and on the 800, the screen seems to be off a little, as if it is a bit slanted because of the camera's design, so it makes it somewhat uncomfortable to the eye when taking pictures. The SD 800 also has a light on top, next to the shutter button which makes it easier to shoot pics in the dark, which the SD 900 does not have. I haven't used the SD 900 but what the SD 800 does have over the 900 is that it is equipped with the image stabilization.
798572
Size is a big difference for me. The A710IS is a bit larger. Also, the top ISO for the A710IS is only 800. Also, I believe the A570IS has video capability while the A710IS does not. I was debating between the A570IS, A710IS, and SD750, and finally settled on buying the A570IS because of it's size, performance, relative ease of use, cost, and batteries.
1887671
I had the sd1400 and the picture quality is pretty good for a point and shoot. don't expect slr quality but i like this camera. i returned my sd1400 because it was at a higher price and just waiting for it to drop which i know it will any day now. i'm going to get the 940 or 1400, whichever i find at a better price.
515400
I don't have the 100 or the 300. My last one was the 500HS. It is smaller now and lighter. The night picture without the flash are all nice. I took lots of them during the Holiday lights event, and they all very clear. Also it has anti shaking mode, it snaps and processing very quick so much less blurry when moving. I think that is a major difference for this camera. Battery life is very short that is the only draw back to me. I like it overal all but be sure to get extra battery.
1464342
Looking at specifications, not experience A2000 is 101x64x32 mm and has zoom range 36 mm-216 mm. SD 890 is 95x57x27 mm and has zoom range 37 mm-185 mm. The A2000 seems to have the advantage in zoom range. The SD 890 is more pocketable.
1195627
SD880 is mostly an upgrade of features that the 770 has. SD 880 has a 3" TFT-LCD screen (vs. 2.5") and 4x optical zoom (vs. 3x). Note that the compensation for the larger LCD is the lack of viewfinder. The highest shutter speed goes to 1/1600 (vs. 1/1500), and the flash range is a couple feet deeper. You can compare the full list of specs from the Canon site: SD880 - http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=145&modelid=17626#ModelTechSpecsAct SD770 - http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=145&modelid=16722#ModelTechSpecsAct
786038
I'm having the same debate with myself! and as far as I can tell (novice!) the extra mega pixels won't make that much dif and I would rather have better zoom (personal pref) capabilites. I look for the increased ISO range now. From what people have told me, some of these cameras don't do so well in low light and the higher that no. is the better the pic will be with less light-that's if I understood it correctly! BTW, I have decided to get the 890, I believe it's the wide angle one of the two! good luck and enjoy-think about a warranty of some type-that was also encouraged by my photo buddies! I'm having the same debate with myself! and as far as I can tell (novice!) the extra mega pixels won't make that much dif and I would rather have better zoom (personal pref) capabilites. I look for the increased ISO range now. From what people have told me, some of these cameras don't do so well in low light and the higher that no. is the better the pic will be with less light-that's if I understood it correctly! BTW, I have decided to get the 890, I believe it's the wide angle one of the two! good luck and enjoy-think about a warranty of some type-that was also encouraged by my photo buddies!
1198691
As someone who spent months in research (and finally decided on the NIKON) allow me to offer my advice: The NIKON P80 has a new sensor with 10.1MP (size 1/2.33" and a pixel density of 36MP/cm2). On its plus side, the small size (although it turns long when zoomed all in), the comprehensive menu and the overall built. On the minus side, the NIKON, although perfectly capable, will not take the best photo if left on Auto. The PANASONIC FZ18 has an older 8.1MP sensor (size 1/2.5" and a pixel density of 32MP/cm2). On its plus size, the impeccable LEICA lens system (and quite short even at maximum zoom), the handy joystick, the great image quality and the mechanical stabilization (the only one of these three that comes with it). On the minus side, the FZ18 is a bit larger that the P80 - and is bound to be replaced by Christmas. The FUJI S8100FD was never a contender for me. With a 10MP sensor (size 1/2.3" and a pixel density of 35MP/cm2) it is not too shabby. Yet, its overall design was not to my liking at all (of course that is a personal preference). The best advice a professional photographer gave me was this: choose the best lens and then the best sensor. Then make sure it is a camera for your level. The PANASONIC has the best lens whereas the NIKON has the best sensor (these cameras are still Point&Shoot, nowhere near the sensor sizes of a DSLR). Bottom line: if new to digital photography or do not care to be concerned with all the tweaking, go with the PANASONIC - it has a much better intelligent Auto (iA) function. If more experienced or would like to be more involved in taking a photo, go with the NIKON. Happy shooting!
735255
My original Cannon camera was a few month old when it was melted in our house fire. When I went to replace it the camera shop said it was obsolete already due to new better models. Bought a SD 3500IS Digital Elph. Has a three inch touch screen with 14.1 mega pixels. It is a great camera and takes great pics. Use it on a Swaroski spotting scope with an adaptor for long range wildlife shots. I have to zero in on my subjects looking thru the three inch screen viewfinder. Could not ask for better.
1148759
Yes it is. That's the reason I bought it greater clarity of pictures than the higher MP, particularly outside. Great all around, best camera!
687249
I am wondering the same thing.I chose the SD4500 over the S95 because it has HD 1920x 1080 Full HD movie and because it has a 10x zoom lens..If anyone can point out why I should have went with the S95 instead please let me know.
1824576
The photo quality is so similar that even an 8 x 10 enlargement is unlikely to show a difference. The SD1300 uses cheaper materials, and looks and feels cheaper. If the price was similar, the SD940 is a good buy. Today, there is a $60 difference between them, making the SD1300 the better buy.
1469930
Thanks for the comments guys, I do notice different brand camera have different color tone, as you mention, "Canon have a warmer-brighter color and a little smoother look", I think Nikon have a cooler but sharper look, I'm using SD870, S90, T2i and now SX40, my S90 takes really good pictures and just little noise at ISO800, not far vs T2i, I was hoping the SX40 up to S90 picture quality, so I don't have to bring it 2 cameras all the time.The SX40 1/2.3" CMOS sensor VS S90 1/1.7" CCD sensor, F2.0-F4.9 VS F2.7-F5.9, 28mm-105mm VS 24mm-840mm, these are 2 totally different camera, I shouldn't compare them at all, there is no camera like all in one :) Thanks for the comments guys, I do notice different brand camera have different color tone, as you mention, "Canon have a warmer-brighter color and a little smoother look", I think Nikon have a cooler but sharper look, I'm using SD870, S90, T2i and now SX40, my S90 takes really good pictures and just little noise at ISO800, not far vs T2i, I was hoping the SX40 up to S90 picture quality, so I don't have to bring it 2 cameras all the time.The SX40 1/2.3" CMOS sensor VS S90 1/1.7" CCD sensor, F2.0-F4.9 VS F2.7-F5.9, 28mm-105mm VS 24mm-840mm, these are 2 totally... » Read More Thanks for the comments guys, I do notice different brand camera have different color tone, as you mention, "Canon have a warmer-brighter color and a little smoother look", I think Nikon have a cooler but sharper look, I'm using SD870, S90, T2i and now SX40, my S90 takes really good pictures and just little noise at ISO800, not far vs T2i, I was hoping the SX40 up to S90 picture quality, so I don't have to bring it 2 cameras all the time.The SX40 1/2.3" CMOS sensor VS S90 1/1.7" CCD sensor, F2.0-F4.9 VS F2.7-F5.9, 28mm-105mm VS 24mm-840mm, these are 2 totally different camera, I shouldn't compare them at all, there is no camera like all in one :) « Show Less
467107
I think I remembered reading somewhere that the 800 does not have a manual mode; vs. the 700 does and the 800 does not have many different shooting scenes, while the 700 does.Also, how is the construction on the 700? I thought I remembered reading that the 800 seemed a little un-durable? True??
106956
i think s95 is compelling if u want better pictures and control. since s95 has the bigger sensor (better pictures) and the PASM (better control). but really, the 4000 is a true P&S wif some kick-ass hardware baked in.
2124488
My dilemma was mainly the SD770 or SD790. I didn't like the 1100 because it was too small, cheap feeling, only 8MP (I was upgrading from a 7MP), and I thought the colors were gimmicky.To me, the 770 is a grownup version of the 1100, but the 790 is a different class. I only wish the 790 had a viewfinder and even though I'm now used to the dial, I still wonder if I'm not doing something right when I use it for pics. I haven't been out on a big trip yet though, so the real test is still to come.
1807178
Anonymous is right, the SD1100is is being phased out because the SD1200is is replacing it. Don't get me wrong the 1100is is a great camera, I've had mine since October of last year and I love it, zero problems. The pros of the SD1200is are that it's cheap and takes great pictures. A bit more responsive than the 1100is. However, one con is that it's made in China, the 1100is was made in Japan. Forget about the 770, consider the 780, which is the newer model. Pros: very small, comes in many colors (4), tough metal body, made in Japan, and takes very nice pics and decent movie clips. Don't really know much about the 990 though. It is much bigger than the 1100, 1200, 770 and 780. What are you looking for in a point and shoot? Might help narrow down the choice for you. Hope this helps.