how does this compare to the Eminence Monoi Age Corrective cream?
807919
the Monoi is thinner and has a much lovlier scent to me....not sure why one is for night but was told that the coconut in this cream acts like a natural retinol replacement for people with skin that is sensitive. Also the Monoi uses a stem cell complex for help with aging. I am not a specialist but perhaps they help the skin in different ways. I have only used samples of both and like each but have a preference to the scent of the Monoi.
807920
I find the Eminence Monoi Age Corrective cream very good for at night. It is a bit heavier than the Coconut Age Corrective, which I like very much for day use.
807921
I have never used that cream so I can't tell you the difference. I first had this cream applied to me at the Spa at Ritz Carlton and it was highly recommended. I am in my mid 60's so maybe it is good for mature skin.
2161256
I agree. I used the Ti SILC product5 for over 7 years. It was the perfect facial sun cream.The new produts are thick and dull....not thin and silky.
2173175
Without comparing and contrasting the ingredients and dosage for both brands I can say that the minute I use the Source Naturals I feel almost an instant boost. An awareness that tells me I probably should have been supplementing topical progesterone for some time. Other than that over time both creams gradually improve my symptoms (night/day sweats, lethargy, craving sweets). Both creams absorb at the same rate for me with little to no residue remaining. I guess the only real contrast (to me) is the somewhat unpleasant fragrance of the Source Naturals compared to the Emerita. I think it takes experimenting with each cream to see which will work best. (** I am 51 & in perimenopause)
1251953
I have mature skin. I use Eminence sparingly, as it is quite thick, but can be thinned with water. Great for dry skin, especially when we have periods of very low humidity here.
1782708
In my experience, the cream lasts twice as long (for me, the cream could last 7+ days and this is 3 days max when I'm at all active). BUT it's definitely less messy since this is a roll-on (and if you use the cream then you know the mess that can be associated with it). I used the cream for 4 years, just started this about 2 months ago. I like this more for ease of use, but have to remember more frequently to put it on. In the long run I'm still undecided on which way to go, so I'm interested to see what others say!
1757714
Go to" http://dermae.com/", the site gives all ingredients and what they do, I have been using both products intermittently for over 10 years. Absolutely love the product, nothing else comes close in comfort. I have rosacea and my skin seems to love this age defying cream.
1520347
I can't compare with any other since this is the only one I've tried of theirs. As for redness and dryness, yes it works very well. Very gentle. Rubs in well and is not greasy.
2173173
Without comparing and contrasting the ingredients and dosage for both brands I can say that the minute I use the Source Naturals I feel almost an instant boost. An awareness that tells me I probably should have been supplementing topical progesterone for some time. Other than that over time both creams gradually improve my symptoms (night/day sweats, lethargy, craving sweets). Both creams absorb at the same rate for me with little to no residue remaining. I guess the only real contrast (to me) is the somewhat unpleasant fragrance of the Source Naturals compared to the Emerita. I think it takes experimenting with each cream to see which will work best. (** I am 51 & in perimenopause) Without comparing and contrasting the ingredients and dosage for both brands I can say that the minute I use the Source Naturals I feel almost an instant boost. An awareness that tells me I probably should have been supplementing topical progesterone for some time. Other than that over time both creams gradually improve my symptoms (night/day sweats, lethargy, craving sweets). Both creams absorb at the same rate for me with little to no residue remaining. I guess the only real contrast (to me) is the somewhat unpleasant fragrance of the Source Naturals compared to the Emerita. I think it... » Read More Without comparing and contrasting the ingredients and dosage for both brands I can say that the minute I use the Source Naturals I feel almost an instant boost. An awareness that tells me I probably should have been supplementing topical progesterone for some time. Other than that over time both creams gradually improve my symptoms (night/day sweats, lethargy, craving sweets). Both creams absorb at the same rate for me with little to no residue remaining. I guess the only real contrast (to me) is the somewhat unpleasant fragrance of the Source Naturals compared to the Emerita. I think it takes experimenting with each cream to see which will work best. (** I am 51 & in perimenopause) « Show Less
1507134
It is no where near the quality of similarly priced cream's, however it is still a good price. As for the Original Gold Elements Age Treatment Creams...I don't believe this is the same item, and it has always had a fluid price depending on the seller. If you are looking for a miracle under 30 bucks, forget it.
1325269
I have both. The vital C is what I prefer. I am 64 years old but have pretty good skin. The Ageless is pretty drying, but the Vital C is more moisturizing. I hope this helps. In general, I think the Image products are wonderful......
624600
I have used both and find no difference in them. I prefer the cream because I only use it on my face and it lasts a long time. The lotion being thinner works better for larger areas such as the shoulders or back.
1875627
I am 64 years old and I have tried both. I prefer the restore and renew as it has made the biggest improvement on wrinkles, especially in the eye area. I use their eye cream once in the morning and again at night.
37684
There are similar and different ingredients in them. Both are effective in moisturizing. I've noticed that the night cream seems thinner in it's consistency and spreads easier. I use the night cream during the day also because I also put a moisturizer with sunscreen over it. I like both day and night creams and will buy both when I can afford it.
1294966
The cream is thicker and gives more coverage initially. The milk is thinner than the cream and feels less oily. I notice it sinks in the skin faster and is less sticky. I believe the cream lasts longer as far as sun protection and it also feels more moisturizing than the milk. But you can always reapply the milk after it dries to build up layers of sun protection. That's what I do.
98660
Honestly, it is hard to tell. I go to spa for treatments, use innovative creams and Zeno is a complementary to all of the above. I have results but not sure from what.:) Sorry, could not be much of help
418511
That's hard to say,as there are so many I've used.I don't feel it's better,but It's fine for a night cream,and the price is good.It cetainly is very moisturizing,but too too haeavy for daytime,IMO.
1684970
Well, I am certainly mature! I have been using it for about 6 months and I do see a difference in my skin. I'm not crazy about the smell but it's not off-putting. It's as effective as the much pricier creams at Saks.