I'm debating between this and Kelty. Any thoughts?
811988
We have not had a problem with the Genji beach tent. I dont know about the other.
811989
This is a great beach tent or yard tent it snaps together in about 30 seconds. and its durable against pretty high winds weighs apx 2 pounds and comes in a carrying case. :D
811990
I own the Genji instant beach tent, it is awesome. Literally takes seconds to set up, is really light and portable. We have owned it for a year and have used it maybe 30 times at the beach and in the back yard. Still looks brand new. I have never used a Kelty, so can't comment on that tent. I have young children, so the ease of use with the Genji is priceless.
1592588
I like it better. I actually own both. The go girl is better to carry because it folds up. Also, I like that it has a top on it. It prevents some spillage.
1098512
Go for the larger one. If you're going on a soft but established pathway you should be okay. I wouldn't try mud, but you know that. That Westie of yours will have a blast! Great product.
1236760
My sons used the Coyote 80 for Philmont which was a 10 day 80 mile backpacking trip, but their body frames are a fair bit smaller than yours. I also accompanied them and am comparable in size 6'0", 200lb and used the Kelty Red Cloud 90. It worked out great. You may also want to look at the Red Cloud 110.
1452303
It depends on whether you like larger size backpacks on your back. I am 5'1" and I love larger backpacks. If not, then go with the 25L one.
2241778
For light homeowner use I like the homelite better. For larger jobs, probably the poulan would be preferable.
58644
I would go with a medium size mountainsmith rain fly as the small just covers my 35 liter bagyes, these covers or water resistant up to a heavy rain thru thick wood and brush.
993441
I have the cabelas back back also. It has mor room but everything you put in it is in one spot and you have to dig for what you want. The alps has compartments and was easier to access. Great in a climber stand and held my extra clothing.
1655255
I have both of these tarps and they are both of excellent quality and craftsmanship. I purchased the King Kamo last year for hammock camping because of the extra shelter/coverage area it provided. I have used it several times and it has performed very well. The only thing I wished was different on the King Kamo is the built-in ridge line, I would prefer it ran the length of the tarp as opposed to running the width of the tarp(as it does). Even so, it doesn't effect the quality or performance of the tarp. I also had additional tie-out loops sewn in to suit my personal preference. On The Camo the ridge line runs the length of the tarp which is what I prefer. I have both of these tarps and they are both of excellent quality and craftsmanship. I purchased the King Kamo last year for hammock camping because of the extra shelter/coverage area it provided. I have used it several times and it has performed very well. The only thing I wished was different on the King Kamo is the built-in ridge line, I would prefer it ran the length of the tarp as opposed to running the width of the tarp(as it does). Even so, it doesn't effect the quality or performance of the tarp. I also had additional tie-out loops sewn in to suit my personal preference. On The Camo... » Read More I have both of these tarps and they are both of excellent quality and craftsmanship. I purchased the King Kamo last year for hammock camping because of the extra shelter/coverage area it provided. I have used it several times and it has performed very well. The only thing I wished was different on the King Kamo is the built-in ridge line, I would prefer it ran the length of the tarp as opposed to running the width of the tarp(as it does). Even so, it doesn't effect the quality or performance of the tarp. I also had additional tie-out loops sewn in to suit my personal preference. On The Camo the ridge line runs the length of the tarp which is what I prefer. « Show Less
185399
I bought the small and it is too small for my Kelty 20' dridown bag (which I suspected, but I wanted to try it). I don't need a lot more space so I am going to order a medium. I have other uses for the small so I am keeping it. I think I am going to love the sack but I haven't traveled with it yet.
367529
I would go with the MT. I'm not sure of the return policy but it should'nt be a problem.
1868568
I've only owned the Sevylor so I no basis for comparison. Sorry! The Sevylor is great, though.
130781
it just depends the 100% cotton are very thick so i would go with the ripstop. But the 100% cotton have more pockets, so all depends on what you like
90262
I would go with the Happy Changer by Hulabye over this product due to the fact you can wash it and use normal changing pads under it. That way you don't have to cut slits in a cover or worry about poo getting on the strap part of this product.
1494794
I have both. And I reach for this one most of the time. Quality is top notch. And the ability to fold it up and pack it in my bag is awesome. If you bring it in closer the quality of light is the same as tbe 43". I would go with the 36" double fold, you won't be disappointed
114845
Huge differences! The Sierra is MUCH better. I just returned my Quick N EZ and bought the Sierra. Better 5-point harness, actual padded bench seat vs hammock style seat, pockets on inside for kids, plenty of rear cargo, actual foot operated parking brake, and better stroller handle. Buy the Sierra!
666048
Yes - It should fit. It fits easily in my Kelty 80. I have only used the bag once, but I was impressed with the comfort and warmth. Good product for the price.