besides having a 8 panel design, what are the main differences between the attack shorts vs. quest?
90314
Per specs, they both have same inseam, the Attack is 88%Nylon/12% Spandex; the Quest is 86%/14%. I purchased the Attack prior to a Century ride-the TUC in Humboldt County- I have also been on many 30, 50, 60 mile rides and will say the Attack is a very comfortable short.
90315
The Race 3D chamois on the Attack is slightly thicker than the Tour 3D chamois on the Quest. I find this adds a little more comfort. The Attack's fabric feels somewhat softer, and the flatlock seams which hold the eight panels together add an extra level of comfort too, IMO. This is my preferred pair of shorts for longer rides. I highly recommend the Attack.
1390009
from what I can reasonably tell, resolution is the major difference. reference these two pages for further details,http://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja256/andhttp://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja155/
2084525
Here is a link to a comparison chart. http://edgecraft.com/tips_qrfman.html
1059348
I am not 100% sure since I do not own both systems, but when I was looking I bought the military one for the price just in case it fell apart on me right away. I also noticed, I think, the width of the strap and the trap color. Other than that I do not really believe there are too many differences. I enjoy mine and use it three times a week and it still looks like I took it out of the box.
2216275
Good question. I was wondering the same thing. Recently replaced my dying Eclipse II with an inferior product. This seems like a good replacement and I like the color scheme better than the 2-tone on the Saitek. Wondering if there are any other differences.
1084029
There are a lot of differences. The basic frame is the same, but the items that go on the frame as well as the pattern of the fabric and colors are different. It looks like you have a bird instead of a cloud, and the Keyboard unit for music looks very different. The other two activity inserts look very similar/identical. This item often has new versions released of it (my brother has the Baby Einstein Jumper from 2 revisions ago... prior to the too springy Sun Recall) This may just be a revised version.
1220114
I believe the old style gives a faster shave, but it is possible to cut your skin easier. The newer screen slows me down some and I get a few more ingrown hairs. L
1936584
The difference is the LCD screen has a 360 tilt making it so you can see yourself while you shoot. It is very convenient and easy to use!
577878
This UQ model has a different polished edge type, THX certification, and AquoMotion 960 which is a brighter panel. Hope that helps!
1734921
I'm not familiar with the 8 or the others. Mine has been dropped at least 4 times without any marks (fumbled to tiled bar floor & sidewalk). The different shooting selections are nice & simple to go through. Battery life is long & film is better than I expected in different lighting. I'm in my 40s & didn't want to look like I was carting a toy around. The classic look was appealing, the good quality was beyond my expectations.
1770404
Hi, actually a bug difference in size. Don't know if have other mayor difference in function. I do recommend to buy a battle bag, because the mine was difficult to close and don't fit well and yes, I have a PS4 and it fit
285893
The difference between these products is this is the one you want. They both work as a smaller cintiq plugged into your computer but the 13HD came out before, and can not work independently as a mobile sketching tool. Also, there are some things about the functionality that people with the 13HD have complained about regarding the looseness of the cable which links to the monitor which can cause the screen to go black as you shift around while drawing. I should also note that if you go to the wacom store like I did, this product starts at 1200, with free shipping. So after taxes was about 1400, only about 400 more than the 13HD.
1329607
I agree with gimp's answer below.I think the threads in the quick connect are finer threads.
1356531
The A1350Q1T is a full size tripod 3 leg extendable for 174.00 180.00 one of the legs is removable and lets you convert the Tripod to a monopod. the Q1T IS BIGGER BALL HEAD and holds more weight the whole assembly is made to carry more weight. The 0T IS much smaller built to carry a lighter load the ball head is smaller although both held My Canon 7D with 24-105 L Lens and the canon 200mm on the same camera I DO OWN BOTH and depending what you want and what you will use it for price is much different one about 120 the other 180 one is smaller one is lighter two completely different systems When You look at the ad take a close look it is a little confusing to look at. I recommend looking at the tripods by number and reading the specs individually One caveat about the smaller tripod the leg locks don't take much to loosen the bottom section and will- can extend while carrying without realizing .a little plumber tape on the inside thread took care of the problem.
1728479
I think the difference is the rounded corners and metal slide rails. See my review of this item, not worth it. Look into something better.
817384
charging capability, shorter than normal. it uses a separate charger and two mini hdmi ports.
1645860
Hey RobertFrom image itself I don't see there is much difference... I guess 8x42 having only one type so you should be good to purchase the other one @180$. I got it in 150$ while massive discounts going on Amazon and even I got 50$ rebate coupon from Vanguard so it same in 100$ .I hope I answers your question