Do the modulation effects sound better compared to the G1N, or it&acute;s about the same, but only with more resources?
454313
Good question, but I haven't use the G1N, that I can recall. I have use analog, and digital effects and a combination of those for years. The G3 has enabled to retire those things. In fact with a little Crate Power block, I can basically leave my amp at home or the recording studio. I now have a powerful combo, easy to carry and sounds great a little quieter with all the options I had before and only have to use two patch cords.
1160606
Sonically, they are no different from the US version. They are distinctly a higher end set of headphones, with very neutral tonalities. You'll enjoy listening to them. As far as the instructions are concerned, I did the same thing as others here, did. I downloaded the English version of the instructions.
855905
Sorry, I don't know the difference in the models, but they do sound very similar in the description.
774785
The main difference is audio quality. The 10 is newer but the 1RNC is a better product. I actually bought both at the same time knowing I'd return the one I liked least. I sent the 10 back and kept the 1. Less important, the 10 is powered by a AAA battery, the 1 is internal. The 1 has a better comfort level on the head than the 10.All of that said, they are both very fine headphones, I just preferred the 1 and didn't mind the extra money in the long run.
471600
I don't know if it was the particular copy, but on my X-T1 it was considerably slower than 18-55 mm and louder!
1161885
I usually shoot with an Olympus E-P1. The GX1 focuses at least twice as fast, but then I am usually doing landscape or portrait shooting, so the GX1 speed advantage is not that important to me. However, I feel the GX1 firmware produces a softer (some might say "creamier") output on both jpg and raw images, so I usually reserve it for portraits of humans and continue to use the E-P1 for the bulk of my work. If you are interested in shooting sports, the fast focusing of the GX1 is far superior to the E-P1, which is next to useless for that application (unless you prefocus and wait for the shot). I usually shoot with an Olympus E-P1. The GX1 focuses at least twice as fast, but then I am usually doing landscape or portrait shooting, so the GX1 speed advantage is not that important to me. However, I feel the GX1 firmware produces a softer (some might say "creamier") output on both jpg and raw images, so I usually reserve it for portraits of humans and continue to use the E-P1 for the bulk of my work. If you are interested in shooting sports, the fast focusing of the GX1 is far superior to the E-P1, which is next to useless for that application (unless you prefocus and wait... » Read More I usually shoot with an Olympus E-P1. The GX1 focuses at least twice as fast, but then I am usually doing landscape or portrait shooting, so the GX1 speed advantage is not that important to me. However, I feel the GX1 firmware produces a softer (some might say "creamier") output on both jpg and raw images, so I usually reserve it for portraits of humans and continue to use the E-P1 for the bulk of my work. If you are interested in shooting sports, the fast focusing of the GX1 is far superior to the E-P1, which is next to useless for that application (unless you prefocus and wait for the shot). « Show Less
1008329
From my understanding, there were noticeable upgrades from the g15 video compared to the g16. I've never recorded a concert, but I have recorded a jam session in a pub in Glasgow as well as the organ playing at the Kelvingrove museum. The sound quality is better than any compact camera I've ever used. Very clear, crisp and true in my opinion. My main issue is it picks up wind when recording outdoors... But I believe that's common with the built in microphones in most cameras... I am also bummed that the hotshoe does not support microphones because the camera itself does not have an audio import Jack... Which would've made it perfect in my opinion... Other than that, the sound quality is really good when recording indoors and on still days outdoors. A side note, I imagine if you are going to concerts with really loud bass and beats (like rock concerts or the like)... I think most cameras will distort sound in general because of the high decibels going on. You'd probably need a proper camera with a proper microphone connected to it to get clean sound in a loud environment like a rock concert. But for something like an orchestra, I think it will be just fine.
1942726
I don't exactly know what is the difference between G2 (that I own) and R5 version (May be R5 is a newer technology or not). However, the G2 has a max output of 180 and the R5 has 189. Other than that I have not really observed any difference when read the product specifications. All I can say is - two or three extra bucks will get you higher output (although the difference is subtle and probably you won't even notice by doing a side by side comparison).
275678
I don't know G1N, but looking to it's specs, I see one immediate difference, wich is the one that made me buy the G1on: G1on has a 30 second looper, wich is not present on G1N.
24375
Well they're pretty much the same volume level. The remote sounds better though, replicating the sfx on the show. The remote's emitter needs to be extended to achieve that same volume level too. When it's retracted it sounds even quieter. But i wouldn't get it if you're planning on going mobile with it. Its a good chunk of change to risk breaking on the move or cosplaying , etc.
2136170
Sound is the same completely But it does over heat if on full 100% display for a really long time. but the cool part is the g2 will adjust the brightness to cool it down when it does over heat
606289
I have the LX 6000 and my room mate has the LX 3000. I like where the mute button is on the 6000 better and I think it is lighter. It sounds better also. I have used both of them and I prefer the 6000
262452
The 751 is slightly bulkier and heavier, which is still negligible, and it produces more bass. I have no regrets.
654185
Nope there's no point in paying 60 bucks on a 7.1 soundcard in tandem, unless you also want to have a surround speaker setup. You are correct John, all audio is processed by the G930's soundcard including the simulated 7.1. While using the headset all other audio hardware in your system will be ignored.
2222820
I can't say if if their will be a big diff. but there will be a difference in richness of sound, if you get a better tube it will be even better.
400378
Do you have a G1XN? As far as I know it's not compatible with any of the G1 models, but it is with the G3. I'm not a huge fan of it myself, but that's because I like wah/exp pedals with a bit of give out of the gate.
2176852
The G4ME ONE has an open-can environment that allows the earcups to breathe. Also allows outside sound to go through a little easier. Whereas the ZERO is a closed can design. Completely enclosed cups that isolates your ears inside the headset. Outside sound is better filtered but the cups can get a little hot. I have the ZERO myself and I don't really notice ears getting hot or anything unless it's specifically hot in the room I'm gaming in.