How does this model compare to Vixia HF R 21
136456
Canon vixia hf M52 is better in low light than R21. I am actually selling my Sony 1000U pro video camera, because i own two Canon cameras: Vixia M50, and vixia M52, and these two have better image quality than the much bigger Sony 1000U.
734930
Is a build-in flash memory , plus a SD card slot ( just one slot). You can buy the Vixia HF 50, which has just 8 GB build-in memory flash instead of 32, and buy an 32 GB SD card and save some money, both cameras as identical except for the build-in memory . I have both ( M52, and M50) They are great at low light.
1062810
You might not need the bigger LCD or viewfinder but you do need the OIS if you shoot handheld, previous Canon camcorders got a really bad stabilization, the new stabilization is not ground breaking stabilization like SONY (Pretty much let you walk and shoot with 0 shake) or "Very Good" like Panasonic but it's "acceptable" and will remove low shake Other thing that is special about HF S200 is that it can shoot at Native 24P so if you are into shooting short movies or so it's one of the best features, normal consumers who do not use a tripod find it "jerky" though I'm personally going with TM700 this year because i need a very good stabilization and wide angle plus the 1920x1080p60 is something i wanted for years, HF200 lens is zoomed in quite a bit for my taste
1046019
The link for the comparison at cameralabs.com is not applicable because it tested the Sigma 18-200 DC prior to the release of the OS version. The OS version is much better optically than its predecessor and also includes HSM (High Speed Motor). I have read test reviews and comparisons at other sites such as popphoto that indicate the Sigma is sharper and has less distortion than the Nikon 18-200 VR, but they also state it is slightly louder. I just received my Sigma 18-200 OS today and have done limited testing, but I can tell you the AF and OS noise are not bad (the OS chirps when it turns on and off). The Sigma AF is louder than my Nikon 18-135 (w/SWM), but quieter than the AF on my Nikon 50mm 1.8 prime (wo/SWM). The HSM AF seems just as fast as my Nikon lenses. The build quality feels better than the Nikon 18-135; the zoom is smooth and solid. The first things I tested today were barrel distortion and OS functionality. Barrel distortion is present at the wide end on ALL wide-range zooms, but the Sigma controls it better. The Sigma has noticeably less barrel distortion at 18mm than my Nikon. This benefit of the Sigma is moot really, because barrel distortion of both lenses can easily be corrected with software. The OS functions very well, I can shoot hand-held down to 1/10th of a second with no blur. I will post again after I have time to do more testing.
740245
I have limited experience so far but I will say I had the Q-see 4 camera system and doesn't compare to the Zmodo system. The cameras are more accurate . I will recommend the Zmodo right now as I am very happy with it. The user manual is not worth anything so you will have to learn on your own. Once you do it is a great system for the money
1253032
I'd be curious about this as well. I bought a standard definition FS200 which had really grainy, poor video quality. I'm ready to pay extra for the HD version but would like to know how you like the video quality of of the HF200 so far.
543666
I'm in the process of buying a Vixia HF-G20, if that's what you meant by hg20. I was just told by Chris at the Canon Support team that the WL-D89 would work with it. I'm still trying to get confirmation on that from a second source though.
2091073
HG21 has a better sensor(1/3.2") than the HF20/200 (1/4"). Also, it still has the flash card option to record video, in addition to the hard drive. Not to mention, the HG21 also includes a viewfinder, which is missing in the HF20/200. I would definitely pick the HG21.
851241
I tried both side-by-side. F/3.5 model focused noticeably faster in low light. It also has a better build. On the other hand it is larger, heavier and uses more expensive 82mm filters (F/4-5.6 uses 77mm filters). Plus at the time I purchased it, the 4-5.6 model cost $407$ at my local store and the 3.5 model cost $649, which is $250 difference. At that price difference you might as well get excellently reviewed Tokina 11-16 constant F/2.8. Some food for thought
1118185
Ralph, on my Canon Vixia HF R400 Camcorder, the factory battery which was included with the unit shows 94 minutes total recording time on a full charge. Both of the batteries in the Fully Decoded Pack with charger are recognized properly and each one shows 190 minutes recording time on a full charge. All of these times seem accurate in actual use. Before getting this item, I had some problems with other cheaper batteries not being recognized and not showing the battery condition properly, but these have been fine for me so far. I hope this helps.
441169
Any luck? I am in the same boat as you... I notified Canon regarding the s200 and the HF M400. Here is the reply I got: The VIXIA HF M400 is scheduled to be available in late March for an estimated retail price of $649.99. This is not a replacement for the VIXIA HF S200, but for the VIXIA M-series, HF M300. The VIXIA HF S30 is the only successor at this time for the VIXIA HF S200. The VIXIA HF M400 is a lower class model compared to the VIXIA HF S200. So what does lower class mean? Cheaper lens??? Just when I was set to click on the buy now
1816397
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-VIXIA-Memory-Camcorder-Optical/forum/FxNJWSCETIOO24/-/1/ref=cm_cd_t_mdb_f?_encoding=UTF8&cdItems;=25&asin;=B001OI2Z2I Seems to be the same subject.
712313
http://www.manufacturer.com/product/m6779255-Canon+VIXIA+HF+M41+Camcorder+-+1080p+-+2.37+MP+-+10+x+optical+zoom.html
309498
I very much like that the memory card for use in the HF R500 is larger than the very tiny card used in (for example) the Sony Handycam (which requires also that you use a special adapter with which to insert the card into the computer tower. Greater ease of handling the memory card was a material issue for me.
37869
Far as I can tell it's the same model. I think they're both made by a company called swivy. Carey speed has a good brand name but overpriced. They have a vf4 that is more compact and exposes the slr buttons better but is way overpriced IMO. My ggs works just fine. I took it to mt Everest and it was terrific and didn't break. Only lost a screw tho. Make sure those are dialed in good
1375921
In fact, they are not recording the same quality, HG20 is a set ahead than HF100, 24Mbps against 17Mbps, resulting better quality. Can we see the difference? Who knows? But it's there...I aggre with you, HF100 feels cheap(in fact it's cheaper) but does not give the quality feel of HG20, it's not as ergonomic as HG20...HD part of HG20 lets you to handle it better, HF100 feels too small..But, are these enough to pay about 65-70$ more?
589202
I use it with a Vixia HF 21 and it works. That is as much as I can tell you.