Quadro or GTX for Adobe Photoshop "batch" processing (&gt; 5,000 images)? Thx.
176560
I do not know if I understand your question right, but this card is very good for image processing. I had no problems.
1243496
It should run photoshop perfectly fine. I run games and tons of productivity tools on mine. I have upgraded my RAM, but most programs are processor intensive over RAM. And the HP can handle most productivity software that you can throw at it.
1811980
Don't now what "adobe cc" is. The NVIDIA Quadro 2000 video card made a dramatic, positive change to the ability of our computer to reduce regen time for large CAD files. We experienced many crashes in Solidworks with large files, 500MB-1GB, before NVIDIA. I recommend NVIDIA.
1875463
I will suggest you use MK 908, it has quad core. Much easier to handle the video out put. Thanks, have a great weekend!
609877
A few months ago, I built a computer with an Intel i7-2600k, GTX 570, Asus Maximus IV Extreme and a HAF X. Best yet. It has more power by far than a Quadro 2000. As long as CS6 supports my card, I'm certain that I can run it far better with my GTX 570. If not, I'll find something that can alter the code that will let me use my 570.BTW, my 570 runs CS5.5 premiere perfectly and in realtime.Thanks :)~asuperpower
688002
Any computer can in principle run any type of software. How much mileage you get out of it will depend on how complex the software is, how complex are the tasks you need to perform, how large are the individual images to expect to edit, how large your overall image library is, and how much you are willing to squint (or are willing to pay for an external monitor). Photo editing software is a broad category - power functions in Photoshop will work very slowly if at all, whereas cropping in Picassa will have no trouble. The 11"MBA was designed as a tool for common productivity tasks (at which it is fantastic), not as a photo editing powerhouse. It doesn't have the memory, storage, graphics and computing power to handle complex tasks. For very simple ones though - sure.
713823
I am not sure. I have never try it. But it runs Photoshop CC and AutoCAD 2013.
1513472
that is correct. My friend has one with the NVIDIA chipset built upon the board. It produces stunning graphics on screen and with Corel Photoshop it breezes right thru picture manipulation.
2243205
I'm a graphic designer, and I also have an Epson v500. I don't recommend the ScanSnap for photos or illustrations. Stick with the Epson v500 for that. But if you have a pencil sketch that you need to place in Adobe Illustrator as a guide, that's just fine.
1208991
Maybe if you need it for an intensive use like video edition or rendering. Then for a normal use ( up to amateur photoshop use for example ) is ok. It has never go slow for having 5 to 10 programs running at the same time ( chrome, word, powerp, photoshop, illustrator, etc)
1856045
Sorry not exactly sure what are the requirements for photoshop software you will be using, certainly this is an i7 4Gen laptop, should be able to run any programs on it, if you are currently using a laptop and you have used the same applications with that many pictures and works fine, then with newer models you shouldn't have any problem. We would also recommend to find more info online.Thank you,
1475167
Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (and previous versions) will run on this computer, however it will run very ineffectively. It will use about 50% of this computers RAM and nearly all of it's processing speed. If you are using advanced tools such as the Healing Brush Tool, Blur Tool, Smear Tool, and anything else that does advanced pixel manipulation, the computer will slow down and the program may crash. I recommend finding a machine with at least 6GB of RAM, and quality performance dual core processor. You might find one for around $350
1737679
I am not really familiar with version 4 but I can tell you that between Photomatix 5 and Photomatix Pro 5, about the only real difference is that pro allows you to work in batch. Each of the two can be run in either 32 bit or 64 bit. Each allow the user to make a quick photo-style selection (default, balanced, photographic, smooth ... etc) then manipulate manually from there to suit your taste. The results for the most part are generally pleasing. More recently I have added Pro Photo Editor and find that it is as easy to use but has a LOT more bells and whistles for even more pleasing results. Between that and Elements 11, There is little that can't be done to enhance a photo to exactly the shot you were looking for and are proud to publish.
125180
This works just fine, it just depends what apps you use. I'm running the whole Adobe Suite CS6 just fine while doing multiple things without missing a beat.
1952306
I use Photoshop 5.5 and its works great with my Canon raw files. I might buy a second one for a backup card reader.
1763287
For what it's worth, I use Photoshop Elements 2.0 with my AR3700. 2.0 is a very old version, but still works really well for all my photo editing tasks. So far as I can tell, my edits of 8MB images don't challenge the Atom D525 CPU at all, even with several images in memory.
2068050
I run PhotoShop and the processor is fast enough. With Windows 8 and 8GB of RAM, it will run Internet Explorer at the same time without noticeably affecting PhotoShop performance. How well multiple open web pages perform is more a function of your internet connection speed. If you want more speed out of PhotoShop, try adding more RAM.