If this is plugged into USB 2.0 port does Ethernet still run @ at 1000?
146894
This Ethernet unit is 10/100Mbps so fastest is 100Mbps. If you plug this or any USB 3.0 to a USB 2.0 port, it will default to USB 2.0 speed.
829591
It wouldn't matter because it's the worst USB net card I've ever used. I ended up with a LinkSys AE1000 - Save your money (and sanity) and buy whatever the replacement is for the AE1000.
395304
No. All the USB 3.0 share the same bus at 2.5Gbps. The ports controlled by a singe 4 ports Fresco Logic FL-1100 USB 3 controller.
158296
NO. I bought a USB Linksys DUAL BAND AE2500 Then it kept 'cutting out' SO I hooked up to the EtherNet port in the back. Works better (faster, Obviously).
1489203
perfectly. are you looking for exact transfer speeds? I've used it on USB2.0 ports this entire time and it is fine.
338707
Assuming the distance from your router isn't too far. Try to take off all other USB components having only the wireless adapter plugged in and see if the signal is higher. USB 2.0 isn't very strong. Just like cable it loses its strength with more stuff plugged especially if its on an older mobo. Hope this helps.
1673389
Yes to Ethernet pass through. The port is 10/100. You need the T42 to get gigabyte.
974357
It will not. It will give you USB 2.0 speeds only, as the host port is USB 2.0.
789973
Yes it does. With the trend of excluding older hardware from newer computers, I don't see Ethernet going out anytime soon. It's the fastest possible connection and all business still rely on wired connection rather than range limiting wi-fi or other wireless connections.
126078
The manual agrees. It's listed there as Fast Ethernet (100Mb/S) for RJ45 wired Ethernet links.
1932908
That's pretty much a given. If ur using usb 2.0 to connect you can't have speeds higher than the usb 2 limit.
210065
I use mine as an extender from my PC to a 2.0 hub. All 2.0 devices connected share the same bandwidth. If you have a 1.1 device it will still operate but all devices will see decreased speed and performance. Best to connect direct to a PC and replace any 1.1 cables.
450022
No wired Ethernet port, but I bought a USB-to-Ethernet and it works great. It was not expensive. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00ET4KHJ2/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
2239055
Has to do with speed 100Mbps or 1000Mbps http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10/100/1000
678141
No. The motherboard header you are plugging into is USB 2.0 then that will cap you transfer speed.
1302714
I scan using an USB connection and it takes about 5-10 seconds at 400 dpi in B&W; mode in WinXP. I've never tried scanning over ethernet though.
1353295
First, you know this, but deserves repeating XP is no longer supported by MS and soon by others. With that said. Plugable has a 3.0 USB that works (USB3-E1000), I think it will revert to USB 2.0 speed - 100MB, but mine runs at 1GB Also any USB to Ethernet that supports XP will work, has nothing to do with the system and all about USB You can also put a wireless board, but I personally don't use it any more because the USB is faster and doesn't use my wifi bandwidth.