I'm curious for a techie out there, what would be the difference between this and a number 24 inch monitor with ILS display paneling? Movie Watching
149628
Well if u ment "IPS" not "ILS" panel then the difference would be image quality and response time, also price. this is a TN monitor so it is snappy quick and low cost, but not as high quality, image wise, as an IPS. here this should help some http://www.cnet.com/topics/monitors/buying-guide/n but if ur going for mostly movie watching go for a IPS panel monitor. they have better image quality and also i notice this monitor has some backlight bleed (black doesn't look black in a dark scene or picture, kinda has some gray to it)
2205915
I went from two 23 inch monitors to the ultra wide model. I love the screen size and flexibility . If you don't have a HDMI you loose the speaker feature of the monitor and the controls take some time mastering.
1867826
Monitors under 24" have 1 year warranties from Dell. Getting warranty service for products not purchased directly from Dell isn't straightforward. They'll give you the run around, and it's a huge hassle and IMHO not worth it. I bough this monitor and had flicking issues 6 months later. Support was non-existent. Let's just say this is the last monitor I'm buying from Dell - ever. Not worth the trouble, IMHO.
1843298
what is the meaning of better display? there is only TN and superior IPS - and this isn't IPS
1112179
Hi Thank you for your interest. The difference is pixel policy. Please check the pixel policy of each description. This monitor is Perfect Pixel(0 defective pixel) monitor. Thank you.
1866398
1st of al, and once in for all, I purchased a "VP2365-LED", a 23" IPS..NOT the 27"..It does not have or need an HDMI connection for photo editing..Top rated bang-for-the-buck by Photoshop Guru Tim Grey..Accurate color right out of the box..It swivels and tilts.No dead pixels. Has 3 or four USB2 connecting points. Viewing angle 178 degrees north and south..It's a steal at around $250..3 year warranty..It replace an aging NEC24" which was NOT an IPS, and depending uponmy viewing angle, I wouldget inconsistent output..I get an excellent screen to print match at least 90% of the time..I'd buy it again!Eddie 1st of al, and once in for all, I purchased a "VP2365-LED", a 23" IPS..NOT the 27"..It does not have or need an HDMI connection for photo editing..Top rated bang-for-the-buck by Photoshop Guru Tim Grey..Accurate color right out of the box..It swivels and tilts.No dead pixels. Has 3 or four USB2 connecting points. Viewing angle 178 degrees north and south..It's a steal at around $250..3 year warranty..It replace an aging NEC24" which was NOT an IPS, and depending uponmy viewing angle, I wouldget inconsistent output..I get an excellent screen to print match at least... » Read More 1st of al, and once in for all, I purchased a "VP2365-LED", a 23" IPS..NOT the 27"..It does not have or need an HDMI connection for photo editing..Top rated bang-for-the-buck by Photoshop Guru Tim Grey..Accurate color right out of the box..It swivels and tilts.No dead pixels. Has 3 or four USB2 connecting points. Viewing angle 178 degrees north and south..It's a steal at around $250..3 year warranty..It replace an aging NEC24" which was NOT an IPS, and depending uponmy viewing angle, I wouldget inconsistent output..I get an excellent screen to print match at least 90% of the time..I'd buy it again!Eddie « Show Less
235444
The short answer is display port. The long answer is for basic computing and monitors under 22", you won't see a difference between the three interfaces. It depends on if what you are doing is video intensive and what the system you are connecting your display to can support. I only use business applications. You are better off bouncing this question off a gamer or designer if you are looking to use it for that.
787888
I'm also looking for this. I'm hoping for a 24" or less monitor size for my kitchen. If I can find it I may have to accomplish it with a regular PC/Monitor and a TV card or USB. Maybe like Haugguage (spelling?).
1919035
go to www.displaywars.com and plug in 26 versus 32 display - it will show an overlay in color and dimensions so you can visualize the difference. If budget is a consideration then consider as an alternative the panasonic viera 26x1 being price promoted as an amazon special
978713
I'm running 4 @ 1920x1080 and all are 24 inches and up with very few issues. Make sure your power supply is at the upper end of the spectrum, I have to unplug my monitors when I reboot which is a little irritating, but it seems related to the power supply and nothing else. Also pay close attention to the listed issues with DVI / HTMI / Display Port.
407776
This is a bona fide 23" monitor. I like the brightness and sharpness very much, it works well for me for watching movies while lounging on my bed, when connected to my Asus UL30A laptop via the included VGA cable. The HDMI setup has been cumbersome and I may scrap it altogether. Sound via the UL30A' s built in speakers is good/loud enough, that it may not be worthwhile to waste a 1/2 hour figuring it out. Anyway, I got the 15' cable for ~6 bucks, so no big deal.
1647950
I was wondering the same thing. Im gonna call sammy to find out. It seems like such a huge discrepancy to be in this many places. There is more than a small difference between 50,000:1 and 15:000:1. If you find out please let me know ***EDIT*** After calling Sammy's CS they informed me that it was infact a 15,000:1 ratio'd tv. Not bad, but nowhere near the 50,000:1 that has been advertised all over the net. Thanks **EDIT #2** This TV is great. I love it. I would go into detail about the performance and quality, but its one of those things that you really need to see in a display next to a lesser tv. I have this 32 incher right next to a Sharp Aquos 32gp1u and it out shines in almost every way except for the ease of adjusting the picture. Apart from the minor menu quibble this tv is as close to perfect as you are going to find in a 32 inch model. Hands down and without a doubt worth the money if you want a quality 32 flat panel tv with lots of inputs.
161400
Hey! 1. There is definitely a considerable increase in quality between 60i and 60p, especially if you are using the camera to shoot movies. For example, for me, I usually add CG elements into my film since I enjoy making short films, and that does not necessarily sit well with 60i footage. The interlacing can cause weird artifacts especially while I'm compositing shots. The more lateral (horizontal) movement you have, the greater the quality of 60i depreciates compared to 60p. However, as much as I hate interlaced footage, i would stress that you consider what you use your camera for. If it is for straightforward home movies or other casual recordings, then you are FINE! You wouldn't necessarily appreciate or find as great a jump in quality. 2. I'm not going to pretend that I have expert knowledge on this. Your point seems valid. However, RAW bit rate is not always an accurate measure of video quality. And keep in mind that for both cases the bit rate corresponds to bits per second, and if there are 60 frames in a second, interlaced or not, each frame contains the same amount of data, with this data being either interpolated in the interlaced case, or actually captured in the progressive case. 60p at 28Mbps would look better than 60i at 25Mbps 3. You would think so right? However, due to standards that were set in the film industry back in the old days, and the reluctance of the industry to let go of these standards, 24fps is what most movies you watch in theaters are recorded/playing at. In essence it is what makes movies look like movies. Usually just after a glance you can tell whether any playing video is a movie or a TV show; It is because you are subconsciously used to movies looking like they do, i.e. at 24fps. Hence, for a short film maker like myself, 24fps mode is a huge plus! I hope i answered your questions, or at least did so partly. Cheers!
787945
i have the 46". Sales info says its LED but the manual says it's an LCD. i think it's a generic manual.The box says it's an LED and 240 refresh rate. We've had it 2 months now and we love it.
795648
1920 x 1080You can also refer to this website, http://www.samsung.com/us/computer/monitors/LS23B550VSY/ZA-features. I had purchased a refurbished item. Yet, returned it due to some problems concerning power and speaker. Good Luck for your shopping!
923265
I don't see much difference, to be perfectly honest. I can say that the Phillips monitor has been an absolute glorious experience with a picture that is better than most televisions that I've seen. It works perfectly for large computer projects and for watching shows/movies even from a good ten feet away.
1027200
I'm not sure of the "differences" between the two displays as I only have one. My highest screen resolution is 1366 X 768 which is what mine is set at. I don't do gaming, etc. so I don't need ultra-high resolution or bright screens. I wouldn't call my own display "brilliant" but it's adequate for just poking around the internet.