multiple exposure not mentioned?
145337
Limited to JPEG only, though, just like all the others. If you really want high quality HDR images, shoot in RAW and combine them in another software like Photomatix. You'll get much better results than any in-camera HDR processing.
270867
If you have 'long exposure noise reduction' turned on, the camera will take another 30 seconds before you can shoot again. Long exposure NR involves the camera taking another image for the same amount of time with the shutter closed and then subtracts this from the real image to process out noise/graininess. If you have long exposre NR turned off, you can take another shot pretty much immediately though repeating this for any length of time could cause the sensor to heat up and generate additional noise.
787107
It's not a good idea to do any more than four photos on one throw. The more images you add will make the images smaller and won't be able to weave with as much detail and risk making them unrecognizable and being unhappy with the finished product. As for the letting that is no problem at all.
1662500
No, not that I've noticed. It is cut away for that reason I imagine. I'm no professional photographer, but since having that case I've taken pics in 12 countries on three continents without complaint! :)
950344
Sorry man I have not used it yet. On my others camera it is a setting I can change. I'll look at the camera when I get home and see if I can help out. I have been out of town. I'll get back this weekend
104453
Mort, It's easier to start with the second number. You'll need 8X (eight times) longer shutter speed for the same level of exposure on the sensor (or film) as you would without the filter. The first number represents the multiple of the f-stop log-density (0.3) with regard to how much light the filter is letting through. Mathematically 0.9 = 0.3 x 3. So this is a 3-stop filter, meaning that it is only letting through (1/2) * (1/2) * (1/2) = (1/8) of the light that hits front of the filter. Notice that the 8 and 1/8 are reciprocals. If the filter was a 3.0-1000X, it would be a (3.0 = 0.3 x 10) 10-stop filter letting in 1/1000 the light and requiring 1000X longer shutter speed for the same exposure level as without the filter - actually this should be 1024X, but it makes the math easier when you have a round 1000. You can of course stack filters, say the 0.9-8X and the 3.0-1000X for example, and you would have a 3.9-8000X, quite dark. Hope that help, Mark
2081393
No it does not, there is an indicator that shows motion on that camera when in multiple view but does not change the view
1689679
Thanks so much . . . a bit un-unnerving coming from you about the exposures on theHX1 . . . yes, black hair vs.brown,exactly . . . and this can really kill a picture . . . I was hoping something could be done . . . but, I really appreciate your time and I hope your issues are resolved too!
1627243
Only one, but you can overdub on that loop. Can't combine loops in any way that I can tell.
893044
I found it. The menu has a setting for a lens that has an aperture ring. So all I did was change the setting to "permitted" and it worked. So thanks to K. Johnson for the response and I will now put this forum to rest. What a great little camera, the Pentax Kx! And I just found out that it takes multiple exposure pictures; how much fun is that?
1669197
Not at all in my experience. I can see it maybe interfering with flash but I haven't noticed anything like that either.
591453
Maybe it is on a setting where flash is never used like macro, or long exposure. I don't recall the other settings where there's no flash but there are several of them.
1479265
I only have one camera so I don't know, but I did not see anything in the set up that would allow more than one!
1927180
Thanks. The write-up doesn't mention it, nor does the user manual. I appreciate your reply.
926053
In the Rapid Action Shot there are 16 pics!! Each Pic looks a lot like the Previous Pic!! Not much of a difference in each Pic. I find it looking a lot alike!!
1445653
I'm thinking it might be related to the dark corner issue. I noticed more than one reviewer complained about this and there are photos posted up in the customer photo section illustrating this issue. I was going to purchase this camera myself until I saw this potential problem. For example:
170329
I haven't written a review, and haven't even read the other reviews (yet), but I am *definitely* having the soft focus and out of focus problems you are referring to. I can take 10 consecutive pictures - same lighting/angle, etc. and maybe one will be a good picture, 4 not so good, and 5 completely unusable. I wonder if certain models cause this, or if some of these were just defective. I bought because of all the positive reviews, but wish I would've spoke up when I first received my camera.