What are the advantages of this one compared to the T120?
148475
Stand allows mobility no loss of desktop space. Not sure about speed difference
456900
The BC75XLT is cheaper because it has none of the extra features that the BC125AT has. I bought the BC75XLT first and then bought the BC125AT. They are the same scanners except the BC125AT has a lot of "extras" that make it much more fun to use. For example, with the 125 you can label each channel so you don't have to make a list to keep track of them, you can also have the backlight come on when you receive a transmission, so you can see the channel info. There are a lot more features that the 125 has that the 75 does not have. Basically they did away with these extras on the BC75XLT so they could sell it cheaper. I think that the BC125AT is well worth the extra money.
184537
Size, they are about 3.5 inches taller, depth and width are the same and a little more power from the amplifier. The low end sound is a little more fuller/reinforced compared to the T20s even though the frequency response is the same rolling off around 60hz and bottoming out around 45-50hz in term of audibility(verified using a tone generator). If you already own the T20s I wouldn't say the sound difference justified upgrading, but if you don't, you cannot go wrong going with the T40s as this is clearly the better of the two models.
35172
The T1 is much smaller and lighter. PRO adds significant weight to the rifle, although not as much as a COMP sight.
2272119
The T4i is worth it. The new processor, plus the touch screen and video recording time of up to 29:59 minutes are amazing. My advice is if you can afford it, make sure to buy it with the 18-135mm STM lens instead of the 18-55mm non STM. Matched with that lens this camera can effectively compete with some of the more expensive ones. I would get this instead of the T3i
977552
I had the G11, and can say that the G15 is MUCH faster on focussing. I think the G12 is pretty much the same as the G11 in that respect. I haven't done any side by side comparisons yet, but first impressions just going from memory, the G15 photos are better in both sharpness and overall color than my G11. Again, I'm not sure the G12 was, sensor-wise, the same as the G11, but I can say I'm much happier with the differences between the G11 and G15. Hope that may help some.I believe also that the G15 is the first of the G series that can optically zoom while taking video. That's a big plus in my book, and the video from the G15 is outstanding. I had the G11, and can say that the G15 is MUCH faster on focussing. I think the G12 is pretty much the same as the G11 in that respect. I haven't done any side by side comparisons yet, but first impressions just going from memory, the G15 photos are better in both sharpness and overall color than my G11. Again, I'm not sure the G12 was, sensor-wise, the same as the G11, but I can say I'm much happier with the differences between the G11 and G15. Hope that may help some.I believe also that the G15 is the first of the G series that can optically zoom while taking video. That's a... » Read More I had the G11, and can say that the G15 is MUCH faster on focussing. I think the G12 is pretty much the same as the G11 in that respect. I haven't done any side by side comparisons yet, but first impressions just going from memory, the G15 photos are better in both sharpness and overall color than my G11. Again, I'm not sure the G12 was, sensor-wise, the same as the G11, but I can say I'm much happier with the differences between the G11 and G15. Hope that may help some.I believe also that the G15 is the first of the G series that can optically zoom while taking video. That's a big plus in my book, and the video from the G15 is outstanding. « Show Less
484542
Emily, Just order the T104P3. Amazon has it in stock and is no more expensive than the T104. Regards, Herbert
484545
Emily,Just order the T104P3. Amazon has it in stock and is no more expensive than the T104.Regards,Herbert
822718
AS far as I could tell the T40's are a little larger and may offer fuller sound. I say may because I haven't heard them. Based on the dimensions and speaker profile, I chose the T20's as most bang for the buck. I use them in a large very high ceilinged warehouse type space where I train and I very pleased with the sound. Don't get me wrong, they can't replace a real full size set up, but they take up little room, are very cheap, and sound good. My recommendation is the T20's.
28796
I upgraded to this from a T3 myself, and it is absolutely worth it. Better white balance, better colors, faster autofocus, larger screen that swivels, better feel to the camera, ability to use a wireless shutter release, better kit lenses, better feel to the body, silently changes focus while recording video etc. etc. I've written a detailed review myself, and even compare it to the T3 I upgraded from. You can read it here: http://www.amazon.com/review/R3LTKCTC9DEOB2/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm
976816
The only true advantage I could see would be its small size as compared to the FlexTT5 which is larger. If you don't mind the larger size of the FlexTT5 on top of your camera, I would strongly recommend you go with the FlexTT5 on your camera for its readily available battery (AA) unlike the watch style battery in the Mini. Plus, it's also good for redundancy: if one ever fails just switch it with another - no learning curve. Hope this helps and let me know if you have any other questions.
575135
* Based on specs from Canon's website, the main differences are: 1200is has 10 megapixels, the 780is has 12 megapixels (not that adding 12 MP to such a small camera will make that much of a difference anyway.) * The 1200 films its video clips in standard def in .AVI format, which is compatible with Windows Media Player. The 780 can film in HD, but clips are in .MOV format which you will need Apple's Quicktime to view, since .MOV won't play in Windows Media. * The 1200 has a zoom of 35mm equivalent of 35-105mm, while the 780 has a zoom of 33-100mm. (Not a big difference.) * The 1200 shoots 1.4 fps, while the 780 shoots 0.8 fps. (I think that means the 1200 might shoot slightly faster frames per second.) * The 780 does have some extra color features you can shoot with, such as accenting all the red, blue, or green in a photo, etc. Those are neat features, but you could do the same thing in Photoshop if you wanted to. I was trying to decide between these two myself, I think I'll get the 1200.
231214
Buy whichever is cheaper. The differences between the 2 are so small. T5i has a 360 degree dial and some extra creative filters. I don't think it's worth the extra price.
1697749
@Jeffrey... I will agree with you that the Nikon D3100 feels better than the T3 in the hand. Actually the most solid-feeling entry-level DSLR out there right now is the Pentax K-r but that's beside the point. It does have more intuitively laid-out controls. However I have shot with both the D3100 and the T3 and had a much more enjoyable shooting experience with the T3 than the D3100. The T3 seems faster in just about every aspect than the D3100, it has a better viewfinder, and despite its screen being low-res, I actually didn't think it was that bad and it's better than the D3100's. And it has impressive photo quality (even with the kit lens). I think Canon was smart to only have the sensor @ 12mp. So I think overall the T3 is the better DSLR. However, I think Canon should be worried about the Nikon D5100 as a competitor to their T3i.
309946
The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's way more expensive. The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's... » Read More The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's way more expensive. « Show Less
2119921
The biggest difference is in the porting. The RTR EV1200 is side ported and the F12 is rear ported. I have the RTR because the side porting worked better in my set-up and was the reason I chose it.
1009946
I just purchased the T500 and I'm very happy with it. If you don't see yourself taking any video, then the T700 is more feature rich. But, if you'll use the video feature the T500 is significantly better. The T500's HD video in decent lighting is impressive for such a small camera. The T500 screen resolution may not be as good as the T700, but I've found it more than acceptable. A friend of mine has a camera with "Smile Shutter" and he says he never uses it, more of a hassle then it's worth. I could see if you had kids who are reluctant to smile, it might be a nice feature. -Good Luck I just purchased the T500 and I'm very happy with it. If you don't see yourself taking any video, then the T700 is more feature rich. But, if you'll use the video feature the T500 is significantly better. The T500's HD video in decent lighting is impressive for such a small camera. The T500 screen resolution may not be as good as the T700, but I've found it more than acceptable. A friend of mine has a camera with "Smile Shutter" and he says he never uses it, more of a hassle then it's worth. I could see if you had kids who are reluctant to smile, it might be a nice feature. -Good... » Read More I just purchased the T500 and I'm very happy with it. If you don't see yourself taking any video, then the T700 is more feature rich. But, if you'll use the video feature the T500 is significantly better. The T500's HD video in decent lighting is impressive for such a small camera. The T500 screen resolution may not be as good as the T700, but I've found it more than acceptable. A friend of mine has a camera with "Smile Shutter" and he says he never uses it, more of a hassle then it's worth. I could see if you had kids who are reluctant to smile, it might be a nice feature. -Good Luck « Show Less