can this project in 16:9 too?
162534
Yes and No, it supports 16:9 input, but projects in 16:10. Very clear picture without distorting the true ratio.
802738
You can, but that wouldn't look very good. Try getting small bezel monitors instead.
172082
I dont think so, you probably will need a higher model that has zones for what you are looking to do, they are usually 7.1
1176283
It outputs in 16:9 and fills my widescreen being fed from a 4:3 VCR composite output. Smaller 16:9 displays these days are not that expensive.
385702
I can't answer about "2560x1600" cause I have 16:9 monitor, but it supports 2560 x 1440.
589974
Most likely. There are a few frame rate/size output formats that it doesn't like. We've found that most typical resolutions work fine. It's a handily little accessory to have.
61411
I run the screen on 768x1024. I am not sure if it can run on any other resolution.
1631409
Yes... You can do that... every dual monitor arm is independent and you can set it at a specific height....
845583
No, it doesn't do it in the camera, but the Panorama mode will take shots continuously and the software provided with the camera will stitch them together. I often find that the 16:9 aspect ratio gets me the results I want without the fuss.
2271167
Aspect ratio is 16:9. As Megan Tesman already stated, definitely worth every penny.
474274
The short answer is no. In order to fill 2.35:1, you would need to use the (limited) zoom feature, then focus until it's where you want it. However, it will still display in 16:9, so the top and bottom of the projection would still be outside your screen. Secondarily, some of your on screen controls may be outside of your 2.35:1 screen. Hope this makes sense!
1788520
I have not tested it with that resolution so I cannot tell you for sure. :(
1225589
Yes, but only because 64x2 is 128. Not sure on Windows 7 as that's not a multiple of 2.
1163204
Thanks for the extra information, interesting about the rectangular pixels. This seems like a much bigger project than I thought it was going to be. I tried a lot of resolutions and found one that appears to leave only one column of pixels on the right side unused. It's 430x222. Funny how a single digit can make a significant difference.
1267559
You could do that by opening 2 programs at the same time and shrinking each one to half size of the monitor. It makes for a smaller workspace on each one, but that is not a problem.
1464568
I have mine set to 1600 x 900 and it looks awesome! This is the recommended as well as the maximum resolution available.
626775
It could, although it probably wouldn't be the greatest quality and you'll need a powerful enough GPU to drive the extra pixels at high frame rates. It is made more for static image displays. There is an answer to this question on the Displaylink website