Does the GH3 have any advantages over this camera besides the price?
136444
GH4 is better than the GH3. The GH3 is better than the GH2. This year's Iphone is better than last years. Notice a pattern?
136445
One is 1080 and other is 4k which you can grab a decent print size quality jpeg from a frame in video.
136446
GH3 has zero advantages. GH4 not only has 4k video (8mp frame grabs), it has many other features lacking in the GH3. GH4 has 12fps burst shooting, *much* larger buffer, high-speed shooting option, etc. See dpreview side-by-side comparison.
136447
Consider the new FZ1000, especially if you have used or own Sony RX10 (sensor size superzoom). I cannot comment on that because I don't own that model, but the GH4 is in a different league because it is interchangeable lens M4/3 lens system. The thing these two have in common is 4K video, although I have read mixed reviews on this technology that you probably admire in the movie theater. Value wise, the FZ1000 looks brilliant. Other than the 4K advantage for video-recording, its closest competitor at the time of this post is the RX10, and I read about this on another site.
1852342
The short answer is 'yes'. The relative image quality provided by the T3i is actually on par with the newer models. If you ever want better image quality, a higher-end lens will provide a much, much bigger improvement (and, since you saved some money on choosing this model, you might be able to get such a lens sooner). The camera includes everything you need and is only missing a couple of shiny new features provided on the newer models. If video is VERY high in your priorities, however, you might consider the 70D or SL1.
1518250
I'd prefer the 330 HS -- because I don't trust touchscreens.However, I don't own either at the moment. I'm shopping for a replacement for a damaged 300 HS, and the 330 HS appears to be a similar camera with some nice upgrades.The differences in megapixels and zoom range are really minor. It's doubtful that you'd notice any significant diffs.
1134714
Have you made a decision? I'm in the same boat. Got a bunch of Sony DVs but the camera is huge. Time to move to HD. I like the Canon HF M40 because its got alot of the same optics as the G10 at half the price. The Pan has a much better range on the wide end, so I'm torn. Not sure if the Pan features are as good as the Canon otherwise.
454312
Don't know to be honest as I've never tried the G1N. Looking at the specs side by side though the G3 is miles ahead. A worth while investment I would say.
1518253
I'd prefer the 330 HS -- because I don't trust touchscreens. However, I don't own either at the moment. I'm shopping for a replacement for a damaged 300 HS, and the 330 HS appears to be a similar camera with some nice upgrades. The differences in megapixels and zoom range are really minor. It's doubtful that you'd notice any significant diffs.
1627485
G5 is newer and can record 1080 at 60 progressive frames per second. GH2 can use external microphones and has manual video controls. G5 is smaller. If you are into professional videography, go for the GH2 for the manual controls and 24fps, if you want high-speed videos to slow down (bird videos?) go for the G5.
1831772
In nearly every review of the G6 the reviewers state there is NOT much difference between the G5 and G6 EVF's (picture wise) however the refresh rate on the G6 EVF has been VASTLY improved over the G5's which in itself had been improved over the Gh2's so in effect along with the VERY accurate focus peaking system (not available on the GH2/3 or G5) and improved focusing performance overall on the G6 practically makes it the superior camera in these areas!
132872
Well, I'm now reading about another option: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20/B 10.1 MP Digital Camera with 10x Optical Zoom and Super Steady Shot Image Stabilization.This one compares to the Panasonic ZS3 and both sell for approximately the same price. I guess I'm still stuck in wanting to figure out which one of these models (DSC-H20, ZS3, DSC-W350, W370) can do all of the things they promised but at a faster speed.
262287
Without a doubt the Panasonic is a better deal and camera for the money ,I have both the G12 and the LX5 and the Panasonic wins hands down in almost all aspects. Just My op of course.
1071781
I could not justify spending extra for the 300hs. I have been using the 100hs for 3 weeks now with no complaints. I do not take much video but overall I am happy with my purchase. I was able to pick up the 100HS when Amazon had the one day sale on gray for 159 out the door.
1989937
I can't wait for a reviewer to get their hands on the HS20. Sounds great on paper.HS20 reportedly has Bigger CMOS sensor and faster circuits (along with a few other fixes, plus remote shutter release capable, more frames per second, SDXC, and includes a proper bayonet mounted hood).HS10 at under $400 sounded too good to be true, this sounds more like it, how it is worth the extra dough.DP Review reports the basics (propaganda):http://www.dpreview.com/news/1101/11010513fujifilmhs20exr.asp
462534
I have one and like it very much. Excellent camera with great features at a very good price. Portability is a big plus in addition to various kens options. The only downside I see with the G5 is indoor auto white balance accuracy. However, this could potentially be corrected with a firmware update or on your own easily with a little post-processing. Definitely worth owning.
1848044
On the Panasonic GH4? 1 hour and 25 min! and 45 min in 1080p All-I! It works perfectly for both, no problems. Better than I ever expected
1374173
I just parallel tested my beloved G9 vs. my new G10 using a tripod; same subject, lighting, settings, modes, at ISO 80, 200, and 400. The 10 renders noticeably crisper and cleaner pics than my 9. Also, my G9 consistently produced images that were 10 to 15% on the dark side. The 10's exposures are spot on. I no longer have to jiggle with in-camera exposure comp for each image or take each one to Photoshop for correction. And I like the G10's much improved LCD, the wider angle lens, and better grip. I think you'd like the 10. I couldn't be happier with my purchase.
440164
I had no trouble making the choice for the LX3. The only real advantage of the G10 is the zoom range, and even though my previous camera was a Panasonic DMC-TZ5, with a fantastic 10x zoom, I never used it. The f/2.0 lens and the dynamic black and white mode sold me. Now that I have it I absolutely love my LX3.
443777
nostalgia. just imho, of course. as soon as a camera is superseded by another, the previous model is suddenly the best camera that ever existed. in the G7/G9 case, there has been discussion regarding an increase in noise levels that accompanied the increased resolution. not having owned the G7, i must judge based on published photos. neither is noise-free, but (again, imho) i believe the G9 is a net plus...especially given the fact that you can grab raw images from the G9 and work on the noise yourself if you wish. that isn't an option with the G7.