Has anyone tried this NIC on a machine running pfsense?
169561
Yes. I have 10+ of these operating in pfsense boxes. In fact as I type this the ingress ethernet and egress ethernet the packets flow through are both of this NIC type. They will appear as: em0 em1 em2 .. (Also work on Opensolaris if anyone is curious)
242994
I have used these packets with a couple of different netipots. I would say that you shouldn't have any problem.
2243415
Check the manual and Cisco user community. The router has VLAN, DMZ and static routing configurations that should allow you to split out the device traffic through a proxy. I have never done this, so maybe someone else has direct experience.
295865
You need to look at your network topology, not the EX4. There are a lot of different ways to get this thing visible on two networks, but be thankful that this thing doesn't act as a switch or hub, because connecting your two networks (physical or virtual) together, just plugging them into each other anyway, is more than probably going to create DHCP and DNS resolution hell.
483030
yes and no: it does support OpenVPN but not its most 'secure' configuration. The OpenVPN server and client on the router use TCP ports (which are vulnerable to SYN attacks) and SSL keys (instead of TLS). It is a better idea to have another machine take care of the OpenVPN server/client configuration and use the router as a firewall (you can implement a simple bruteforce deterrent using the firewall rules)
521185
This is an AC Nic card it will work Win& should have the drivers I use it in Windows 8 and the drivers came right up. Also even though the name is Azurewave its really a Broadcom base Nic... Azurewave AW-CE123H 802.11ac/nbg WiFi+BT Broadcom BCM4352 867Mbps
124269
I have had many routers, and used even more ... off the top of my head I cannot think of any one of them that was not configurable over the network, and worked for PC/Mac/Linux or anything else. I don't rule it out, but I have never personally seen something that did not work with anything ... that is, if it worked at all.
2010365
I believe I had it running under server 2012. Hard to remember now since I got other one to run under esxi but I know for a fact it worked with Windows.
605833
No, but you can make it passive in a way. On a Windows box going to your NIC settings and uncheck everything but leave the NIC enabled. Now it is passive.
2246522
I'm running these for iscsi each port at 9000mtu FreeNas to esxi iscsi for vmdk files :)
358919
DD-WRT and Tomato are linux based (I'm guessing pfSense must be BSD based). 802.11AC chipset drivers are still in development for both, so until the developers finish the drivers, you can't use any of the alternate firmwares with the hardware.
1457735
Looking at the documentation, it does support PPPoE and the GUI looks decent. As for supporting a 255.255.0.0 subnet, it looks like it will but I have never tried it. http://dl.ubnt.com/guides/AirRouter/AirRouter_User_Guide.pdf
2192441
I have not personally tested it ... but I have run Arch Linux and it does have NetworkManager support and good community support -- so it should work -- likey with little issues.
1461046
The LAN is not gigabit and the CPUs supported are the Phenom II series....no specific numbers listed.
1927907
Yes it should. We are running a 2012 R2 environment with 2 hyper-v 2012 servers for testing.No through put problems. However make sure your switch is configuration supports NIC aggregation if its a smart switch. This setting can be ran and managed right from the 2012 R2 & 2012 server management console.Not sure if HP has a application for NIC aggregate like broadcom and Intel does. But the 2012 windows server series seems to handle and manage it just fine. We are also running the NICs and a single point of aggregation that gives us 4Gbps uplink to the network. It's fast!
441954
I tried installing it on a Lenovo Ideapad Y-500 and the proprietary BIOS on the machine prevented it from booting with the card present. There are hacks to permit the use of the card but for now it is waiting till I can put together a network box running pfsense. No idea if you would run into a similar issue with an AMD machine, good luck!
1000468
Yes, it can, it will be able to do WAN to LAN and vice versa through NAT at a little more than 800 mb/s.Edit: check out the full review on small net builder, as they ran either ttcp or iperf tests on it to see where the limits were.